Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19-05 CC Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 19-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, TO CLARIFY THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON-CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS, ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS,AND FINDING THAT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 AND BASED ON THE ADDENDUM TO THE ORIGINAL EIR,NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17-0724) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals and Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 17,2015,the Temecula City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and directed staff to prepare a streetscape beautification plan for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. B. In February of 2016, staff initiated the preparation of the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards and entered into an agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects to assist with the preparation of the streetscape and sidewalk improvement standards. C. In April of 2017, staff identified a need to amend the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to make clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities,clarification of legal non-conforming uses,the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, and to make minor typographical edits. D. In July and August of 2017, staff along with Spurlock Landscape Architects, held two community workshops to obtain the input into the development of sidewalk landscape standards. E. On March 20, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider whether to recommend the adoption of the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan, and the proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. City staff presented a report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the proposed Project. At the conclusion of the March 6,2019 Planning Commission hearing,and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission,including both an oral and written staff report and public comment,the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 19-12, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN,TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON-CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND TO ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN ARE EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17-0724)" F. On April 23, 2019, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the proposed Project including the proposed amendments to the Specific Plan and the proposed Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The City Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the proposed Specific Plan amendment, and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards prior to and at the public hearing. SECTION 2. Legislative Findings. Based on the evidence and all other applicable information presented,the City Council makes the following findings regarding the Specific Plan: A. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.020(E), the City Council in amending the Specific Plan and adopting the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards finds determines and declares that: (1) The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the General Plan, as amended. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development in order to maintain the overall quality of life within the City. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined 2 to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design, and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non-conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits,and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. These amendments do not conflict with any goals, policies or standards of the Temecula General Plan and do not conflict with any goals,policies or development standards of the adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. (2) The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards would not be detrimental to the public interest,health,safety,convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan project has been reviewed by the Public Works and Fire Departments staff to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan,as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition,the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design, and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces,the placement and/or relocation of utilities,legal non-conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. (3) The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards do not change the land use designations or anticipated land use developments as proposed under the Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards provide clarifications development standards,state required land uses,and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area. (4) The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. 3 The approved Specific Plan is a form-based code,which emphasizes the physical form of buildings to foster predictable built results as the organizing principle for the code, rather than focusing on the strict separation of uses. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards clarify development standards and requirements related to legal non-conforming uses,and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area, thereby, ensuring the Specific Plan area will be developed in the desired character as anticipated with the adoption of the Specific Plan and continue to provide for a mix of land uses including commercial and residential uses, consistent with the surrounding area. SECTION 3. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment. A. The City Council hereby amends portions of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and directs staff to incorporate the changes as indicated in Exhibit"A" of this Ordinance. SECTION 4. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. A. The City Council hereby adopts the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Standards as shown in Exhibit"B"of this Ordinance, and amends the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to incorporate the Uptown Temecula Streetscape as a new Appendix "G" to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. SECTION 5. CEOA In November 2015, the City Council certified an EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (State Clearing House #2013061012). Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared because some changes or additions to the certified EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present and therefore a subsequent EIR does not need to be prepared. Staff was directed to file a Notice of Determination. SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the final decision of any court of competent jurisdiction,the remainder of this Ordinance shall be and remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty(30)days after its adoption. SECTION 8. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 14th day of May, 2019. A/\-4/(---- V-- lit-/C- 4--- _____ Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: fr Randi ohl, C• Clerk [SEAL] • I I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 19-05 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23r 1 day of April, 2019, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 14th day of May, 2019,by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart, Naggar NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Randi Johl, City Clerk 6 Exhibit A Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments Deleted text shown with strikethrough and red font New text shown with underline and blue font Chapter 2 Plan Administration C. Plan Applicability The regulations of this plan shall not apply to any application for a conditional use permit on a property within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area that was submitted to and deemed complete by the City’s Community Development Department on or before April 28, 2015, but not yet approved, denied or conditionally approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning Commission on or before the effective date of Ordinance No. 2015-13__ approving this plan. In considering such an application, the City Council may impose reasonable conditions on the conditional use permit in order to mitigate the impact of the project that would otherwise be compatible with the allowable uses and development standards under the Plan, including, without limitation, the duration of the incompatible use and architectural design of the project. E. Legal Non-Conformities 2. Legal Non-Conforming Land Uses Any use of land that was lawfully established and in compliance with all applicable ordinances and laws at the time the use was established; however, due to a subsequently enacted ordinance or law, no longer complies with the applicable regulations or standards of the zone in which the use is located shall be considered a legal non-conforming use. Legal non-conforming uses that were legally established prior to the adoption of this specific plan are allowed to continue as they were, prior to the date of adoption of the specific plan. For an individual parcel with a multi-tenant building, or an individual parcel with multiple buildings, where a legal non-conforming use exists on site, the property owner may lease a vacant suite or building to like non-conforming uses, as permitted under the previous zoning, until such time that the building or buildings on site are occupied by only legally permitted uses as allowed under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan for a period of twenty-four months or more. I. Specific Plan Phased Compliance The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is expected to redevelop incrementally over a 20-year horizon as new development becomes economically feasible. As such, flexible development standards have been established based upon the scope of the proposed project as outlined in table 2-2. Table 2.2: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan - Phased Compliance Matrix Scope of Development Proposal Corresponding Planning Specific Plan Compliance Application Type Required Any project that proposes the Adaptive Reuse Application Adaptive Reuse Standards adaptive reuse of an existing building. A proposed change or modification to Sign Permit Architectural Design Guidelines the exterior of an existing building Sign Program without the addition of new square Minor Modification 1 footage. Major Modification Building additions totaling 10% or less Minor Modification Relative to the new addition only: of the existing square footage on a Major Modification  Architectural Design Guidelines project site in existence prior to the  Signage Standards adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Building additions greater than 10% Major Modification Relative to the new addition only: and up to 50% of the existing square  Architectural Design Guidelines footage on a project site in existence  Signage Standards prior to the adoption of the Uptown  Building Type Standards Temecula Specific Plan.  Frontage Type Standards  Building Placement Standards  Maximum Building Height Standards  Parking Placement Standards  Minimum Parking Space Requirements Building additions greater than 50% of Major Modification All specific plan requirements the existing square footage on a apply (including land uses) project site in existence prior to the adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, or proposed additions which exceed 50% of the current market value of the existing structure (s) on a project site (as determined by an appraisal certification) New development proposals Development Plan All specific plan requirements apply (including land uses) 1 Examples include: paint color changes, patio additions, addition of awnings, material changes, relocation of window and door, etc. Chapter 3 Land Use & Development Standards B. Land Use Regulations Table 3-1: Land Use Matrix 66 List of Uses UC UHT US UA WH-RO CV CV-CO MCR-OS Day care/preschool P P P P C P C P C - 2 (commercial) Residential care facilities (six or - - - - P - - - 2 fewer) Residential care facilities (seven - - - - C - - - 2 to twelve) Residential care facilities for the - - - - P - - - 2 elderly (six or fewer) Residential care facilities for the - - - - C - - - 2 elderly (seven to twelve) FOOTNOTES: 1 Subject to the Standards for Specific Uses outlined in Section 3.I. C. 6 All new development on a vacant parcel or redevelopment of a parcel within an Overlay area shall conform to the allowable uses of the Overlay as specified. Additionally, until such time that a parcel within an Overlay area is redeveloped by adding more than 50% of the existing square footage on the project site, or by proposed addition which exceeds 50% of the current market value of the existing structure(s) on site, (as specified in Table 2-2 of the UTSP), land uses within a legal non-conforming building may be those uses that are allowed within the underlying District, as specified in Table 3-1. F. Building and Parking Placement Standards The standards for building and parking placement are the same for all districts within the specific plan; however, the standards may vary depending on adjacent streets, freeway frontage and creek frontage. New buildings constructed in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area are required to be placed on a build-to line, adjacent to the street, to create a pedestrian scaled environment and facilitate a building’s relationship to the public realm. The placement of buildings on the build-to-line may vary depending on the existing Right-of-Way and street cross section as specified in Chapter 3.H Sidewalk Standards. Parking and Loading Facilities shall be placed on a site in accordance with the following requirements. Exhibit 3-18 Exhibits 3-9 through 3-12 identifies the building and parking placement requirements for lots based on the geographic location within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan areas as follows: 1. Lots Fronting a New and/or Existing Street Table 3-10: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting a New or Existing Street Parking Placement Building Placement 2,3 Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium Property Line to Build- A 10 ft. from property line N/A to Line Rear or Interior Side B Yard Setback (with or 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line without an alley) With Alley – 0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley – 5 ft. from property line 50 ft. from the build-to line Street Frontage 10 ft. behind the property line on 4 C (recommended) 1 Setback the build-to line 4 20 ft. from the build-to line (minimum) 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. 2 When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4 At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50’ minimum parking setback. Table 3-11: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting I-15 Parking Placement Building Placement Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and 2,3 podium Property Line to Build-to A 10 ft. from property line N/A Line Rear or Interior Side B Yard Setback (with or 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line without an alley) With Alley – 0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley – 5 ft. from property line C Freeway Frontage 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line 50 ft. from the build-to line Street Frontage Setback 10 ft. behind the property line on the 4 D (recommended) 1 build-to line 4 20 ft. from the build-to line (minimum) 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. 2 When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4 At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50’ minimum parking setback. Table 3-12: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting Murrieta Creek Parking Placement Building Placement 2,3 Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium A Property Line to Build-to Line 10 ft. from property line N/A Rear or Interior Side Yard B Setback (with or without an 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line alley) With Alley – 0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley – 5 ft. from property line C Murrieta Creek Frontage 20 ft. from property line 0 20 ft. from property line 4 50 ft. from the build-to line (recommended) 10 ft. behind the property line 1 D Street Frontage Setback on the build-to line 4 20 ft. from the build-to line (minimum) 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. 2 When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4 At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50’ minimum parking setback. Table 3-13: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting Santa Gertrudis Creek Parking Placement Building Placement 2,3 Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium Property Line to Build-to A 10 ft. from property line N/A Line Rear or Interior Side B Yard Setback (with or 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line without an alley) With Alley – 0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley – 5 ft. from property line Santa Gertrudis Creek C 20 ft. from property line 0 20ft. from property line Frontage 4 50 ft. from the build-to line (recommended) Street Frontage Setback 10 ft. behind the property line D 1 on the build-to line 4 20 ft. from the build-to line (minimum) 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. 2 When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4 At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50’ minimum parking setback. H. Sidewalk Standards The sidewalks are intended to establish the pedestrian as the priority from curb to storefront. The functionality of a walkable district is achieved through logical streetscape design and compliance with uniform sidewalk standards. The sidewalk design standards emphasize the importance of the placement of buildings in relation to the sidewalk, street and public realm. Consequently, the sidewalk design standards take a two-pronged approach to sidewalk design: 1) they outline requirements for the property located within the public right-of-way, and 2) they provide requirements for the space located on private property between the property line and build-to line. In order to achieve adequate sidewalk width to accommodate pedestrian movement, all development projects shall be required to comply with the sidewalk cross sections show in Exhibit 3-15. Several of the street cross sections are shown having more than 10 feet within the Right-of-way. In these circumstances, if the building is placed ten feet behind the property line (or on the “Build- to Line”) as required is Chapter 3, Section F, the full sidewalk width would be greater than 20 feet. Due to the approved street cross sections and existing Right-of-Way, the placement of the buildings may vary in order to achieve a 20-foot sidewalk. Example: The Jefferson Avenue Cross Section Area 2-B (Section 3-H) shows the sidewalk area within the Right-of-Way as 12 feet. A developer that is required to build the sidewalk between the face of the building and the Right-of-Way may be allowed to place the building at eight feet behind the property line, in order to comply with the intent of the Specific Plan for having 20-foot sidewalks. I. Street Cross Section Standards The existing streets within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include Jefferson Avenue, Winchester Road, Enterprise Circle North, Enterprise Circle South, Commerce Center Drive, Overland Drive, Del Rio Road, Calle Cortez, Las Haciendas, Via Montezuma, Ryder Way, Beuking Road, Sanborn Avenue, Madison Avenue and McCabe Court. Cross section standards have been developed for the existing streets to transform them into more complete streets with on-street parking, bike lanes, and wider sidewalks. The following cross section standards were designed to fit within the existing right-of way and curb-to-curb widths of the above mentioned streets, eliminating the need to widen streets and relocate utilities. These cross sections are to be used when the City prepares its Capital Improvement Program for re- striping and when a developer is required, as part of a development project, to construct the remaining improvements as a condition of approval. A new street that is proposed or required as part of a new development project shall be connected to another new or existing street and/or alley. When a new street is proposed, the new street design shall be compatible with the connecting street design and the proposed right-of-way width, lane width, location of bike lanes or sharrows, curb bulb-outs and on-street parking facilities shall be consistent with one of the specific plan’s street cross section standards for existing streets, and is subject to the review and approval of the City’s Traffic Engineer and Director of Public Works. When a new street is proposed, the new street cross section shall be 1) one of the approved cross sections from this Plan, 2) compatible with the connecting street design, and 3) subject to the review and approval of the City’s Traffic Engineer and Director of Public Works. Chapter 5 Design Guidelines E. Utility Guidelines 1. Existing and New Water Service Design Considerations: i. Underground water plans should shall be provided to the City to allow Community Development staff to verify the proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check (DDCs) prior to final agreement with the utility companies. ii. Double detector check valves should shall be placed above ground to meet Rancho California Water District’s Standard Drawing RW-20. Double detector checks should shall be installed in a location that is internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of- way, or placed in a manner that is architecturally integrated into the building design. iii. The placement of DDCs and other water related utilities in alleyways, parking lots, or within a building “notch out” (internal to the project site) is encouraged to better integrate the utility equipment into the building’s architectural design. iv. DDCs and other water related utilities should shall not be placed adjacent to the sidewalk along the building facades that face the street. This will ensure safe and comfortable pedestrian path of travel along the sidewalks. v. Compact, vertical DDC’s should be used whenever feasible. vi. Landscape construction drawings should shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. A three-foot clear zone should be provided around fire double detector checks as required by the Riverside County Fire Department. Utility equipment should be grouped together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an afterthought. vii. DDCs and other water utility equipment should shall be placed on private property and not within the right of way. Easements should be obtained for DDCs and other water utility equipment when they are placed on private property. viii. Fire Department connections shall be wall mounted on the street side of the building. 2. Existing and New Electrical Service Design Considerations: i. As required by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 04-02, all new electrical lines up to 34 Kv shall be under-grounded. ii. All utility equipment shall be located out of the pedestrian path of travel. All electrical utility equipment, electrical meters, and junction boxes are encouraged to shall be placed within a utility room. If a utility room is not feasible or appropriate, ensure that then all utility equipment is shall be purposefully and aesthetically designed as an integral part of the building, placed adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, or within rear or side yards and screened from public view. iii. Purposeful and aesthetically integrated placement of electrical meters, junction boxes and other utility equipment shall be achieved by encouraging that all equipment be placed adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, within rear or side yards, or in a building “notch out.” All utility equipment should be located out of the pedestrian path of travel. iv. Early coordination with Southern California Edison should occur in order to ensure that transformers are placed in a manner that makes the least aesthetic impact, and to ensure that transformers are well screened and in compliance with utility provider’s standards. 3 Existing and New Natural Gas Service Design Considerations: i. Ensure safe ingress and egress to gas meters for maintenance, meter reading, and service while simultaneously encouraging the placement of equipment that makes the least aesthetic impact to the built environment. ii. All utility equipment shall be located out of the pedestrian path of travel. All utility equipment shall be purposefully and aesthetically placed adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, rear or side yards, or within building “notch outs” and screened from public view. Purposeful and aesthetically integrated placement of gas meters and other utility equipment should be achieved by encouraging that all equipment be placed adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, rear or side yards, or within building “notch outs.” All utility equipment should be located out of the pedestrian path of travel. iii. Gas meters should shall be well screened and in compliance with utility provider’s standards. A 3-foot wide minimum clearance should be provided when landscaping is utilized as the screening method. iv. When appropriate, gas meters should shall be painted to blend into the built environment. v. Consultation with Southern California Gas regarding meter cabinet design guidelines and appropriate screening methods should occur early in the project design process. City of Temecula Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Design Intent 3.0 Design Standards 4.0 Appendix 1.1 Project Background, Framework and References 1.1 Project Background, Framework and References 1.2 Purpose: Importance of Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.2 Purpose: Importance of Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.3 Relationship to City Landscape Standards 1.3 Relationship to City Landscape Standards 1.4 Applicability of Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.4 Applicability of Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.5 How to use this Document 1.5 How to use this Document 1.0 INTRODUCTION T Regional Context DiagramSite Context and Character Diagram Existing Conditions: Minimal Pedestrian Amenities Existing Conditions: Discontinuous sidewalks Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background, Framework and References T ...the Specific Plan calls for streets that achieve a better balance between the needs of pedestrians, bicycles, cars and public transit... Existing Roadway NetworkFuture Hypothetical Street Grid Network Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.2 Purpose: Importance of Sidewalk Improvement Standards T Nice streetsxcape image here...NiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNi NiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNiNicececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececececece s s s s s s s strtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrt rtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeetststststststststststststststststststststst stststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststststs tstststsxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcx cxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcxcapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapap apapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapapa papapapapapapapapapapapapapapapape e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e imimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimim imimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimimagagagagagagagagagagagagagaga gagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagagage e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe heheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheh eheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheherererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererere..... Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.3 Relationship to City Landscape Standards T 1.4 Applicability of Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.5 How to Use this Document Section: Design Intent 2.0 Section: Design Standards 3.0 Section: Appendix 4.0 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards DESIGN INTENT Design Intent 2.1 District Neighborhoods 2.2 Neighborhood Themes 2.3 District Gateways 2.4 Street Typologies 2.5 Sidewalk Zones 2.6 Enhanced Intersections and Gateway Bulb-outs 2.7 Hardscape Framework 2.8 Street Trees and Understory Planting 2.0 DESIGN INTENT 2.0 DESIGN INTENT T 2.1 District Neighborhoods T 2.2 Neighborhood Themes Uptown Center District Creekside Village Commercial Overlay Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT Uptown Hotel / Tourism District Uptown Center District Illustrative Photo Uptown Sports / Transit District Uptown Hotel / Tourism Illustrative Photo Uptown Sports / Transit Illustrative Photo Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT Uptown Arts District Uptown Arts District Illustrative Photo Creekside Village District Creekside Village Illustrative Photo Wilder Hills Residential Overlay Wilder Hills Residential Overlay Illustrative Photo Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT Creekside Village Commercial Overlay Illustrative Photo Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT 2.3 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Gateways T C O M M U N I T Y C . O t S N Ny r E r Ce Th O C R A O Pk F A e E e N r C S s P i A d R C u O r E t T * r C C e O E G N N n F Na N S E O C C T T I O C I N R T S I d DR r H R e t O s N e I h M c n i W R O T B C E N * N O C T C I J R e T " S I e r r D s C D o R M n d O u n r A N r I * a i evl r t eM a e C v r e O e k B * D i a z R d . C H * H B II Kn E t e / r P s E t a D E t T e R 1 A 5 I L C * G H V I E G * W S T O C Rk e e r E C e Er i p K m E Primary Gateway * H Secondary Gateway tiary Gateway V I E W S T O D C R E E K Public Art/ Iconic Element * * Gateway Allee Entry Median Gateway Marker: See corresponding letter descriptions on the following pages A B C D E F HA B C D E F H a i n r * A o Creek f i l a C o Drainage Channel h c n a R Future Street A COMMUNITY CONNECTOR N Figure X.X Gateway Diagram Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT Primary Gateways: A: South and North Jefferson Median Gateways Murrieta Creekside Pedestrian Gateway Illustrative Graphic Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT B: Overland and Winchester Gateways Secondary Gateways: C: Uptown Arts District Gateways D: Del Rio “Y” E: Montezuma Gateway F: Uptown Sports/ Transit District Gateways tiary Gateways: G: Creekside Commercial Overlay Gateways H: Murrieta, Empire and San Gertrudis Creek Gateways Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT 2.4 Uptown Temecula Street Typologies S . t S y r r e h C k e e r C s i d u r t r e G n a S d R r e t s e h c n i W J e " e r r s D o M n d u n r A r a i evl r t e a e C v r e O e k D i a z R d . I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 k e e r C e r i p m E Major District Connector Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Raised Median w/ Planting Creek a i n r o f i l a Drainage Channel C o h c n a R Future Street N Street Typology Diagram Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT T Major District Connector Minor District Connector Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT Neighborhood Street Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT 2.5 Sidewalk Zones S P R O P E R T Y L I N E B U F I L R O D N - T A T G O E - P Z E O L D N I N E E S E = T R 3 I' F A U N R Z N O I S N C H E U I N( R V B G A S =R Z I E 6 O "S N ) E = 4 ' Required Sidewalk Cross Section, 1 P R O P E R T Y L I N E B U I L F D R - O N T T O A G- E L Z I N P O E N E D E E = F S U T 9 R. R 5 I N A' I N S C H Z U I O N R N B G E S = ( Z V 6 O A " N R E I E =S ) 4 ' Required Sidewalk Cross Section, 2 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT Sidewalk Frontage Zone Layouts Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT Sidewalk Frontage Zone Layouts Scenarios 3 + 4 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT 2.6 Enhanced Intersections and Bulb-outs P R O P E R T Y L I N E B U I L D F - R O T N O T A- G L P E I E N D Z O E E N F S E U T R R= I N A 1 I N 0 S ' H Z I O N B N U G E L S B ( Z V O A - N R O E I U E T=S ) 4 ' Required Sidewalk Cross Section, 3 Enhanced Intersection with accent planting Bulb-Out with accent paving and crosswalksIntersection with signage Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT 2.7 Uptown Temecula Hardscape Framework E . t S y r r e h C k e e r C s i d u r t r e G n a S d R r e t s e h c n i W J e " e r r s D o M n d u n r A r a i el v r t e a e C v r e O e k D i a z R d . I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 Major District Connector A Major District Connector B k e e r C e r i p Major District Connector C m E Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Primary Gateway Secondary Gateway tiary Gateway a i Drainage Channel n r o f i l a Future Street C o h c n a R N Street Typology Diagram Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT his document outlines a family of hardscape paving materials and score joint patterns that provide a harmonious T I Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT 2.8 Uptown Temecula Street Trees and Understory Planting . t S y r r e h C k e e r C s i d u r t r e G n a S d R r e t s e h c n i W J e " e rr s D o M n d u n r A r a i evl r t e a e C v r e O e k D i a z R d . I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 k e e r C e r i p m E Large Canopy Medium Canopy Seasonal Accent Evergreen Accent Creek Drainage Channel Future Street a i n r o f i l a C o h c n a R N Street Tree Diagram Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTENT S Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards DESIGN 3.0 Design Standards 3.1 Layout Plans and Materials by District 3.1.1 Uptown Center District 3.1.2 Uptown Hotel / Tourism District 3.1.3 Uptown Sports / Transit District 3.1.4 Uptown Arts District 3.1.5 Creekside Village District 3.1.6 Gateways: Enhanced Intersections and Bulb-Outs, all Districts 3.2 Site Materials 3.2.1 Street Lights 3.2.2 Tree Grates 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting 3.3 Additional Site Elements 3.3.1 Site Furnishings 3.3.2 Utilities and Equipment in the ROW 3.3.3 Bus Shleters 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.1.1 Uptown Center District J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Major District Connector A Major District Connector C Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector A Plan Layout . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector A Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Neenah Vehicular and Pedestrian Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4’ x10’ R-8815-b LED Light w/ Banner Kit 4”X16” Acker-Stone Finish Warm Earth Tone Blend Podocarpus gracilior Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector C Plan Layout . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector C Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Vehicular and Pedestrian Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish LED Light w/ Banner Kit 4”X16” Acker-Stone Finish Warm Earth Tone Blend Bouteloua ‘Blonde Festuca mairei Ambition’ Podocarpus gracilior Amaryllis belladonna Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Plan Layout . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light Sandblast Finish Rosa ‘Ice Dietes ‘Variegata’ Westringia f. ‘Morning Light’ Lophostemon confertus Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Plan Layout . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit Rosa ‘Ice Dietes ‘Variegata’ Cap’Westringia f. ‘Morning Light’ , Arbutus x ‘Marina’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.1.2 Uptown Hotel / Tourism District J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Major District Connector A Major District Connector B East Major District Connector B Allee Neighborhood Street Entry Median Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector A Plan Layout . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector A Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Neenah Vehicular and Pedestrian Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4’ x10’ R-8815-b LED Light w/ Banner Kit 4”X16” Acker-Stone Finish Warm Earth Tone Blend Podocarpus gracilior Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B East Plan Layout . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B East Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Vehicular and Pedestrian Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish LED Light w/ Banner Kit 4”X16” Acker-Stone Finish Warm Earth Tone Blend Platanus racemosaSilva Cell Dianella revoluta Pennisetum ‘Bunny Bouteloua ‘Blonde ‘Little Rev’Tails’ Ambition’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B Allee Plan Layout . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B Allee Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Vehicular and Pedestrian Pedestrian LED Light Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish LED Light w/ Banner Kit Finish Platanus racemosaSilva Cell Dianella revoluta Pennisetum ‘Bunny Bouteloua ‘Blonde ‘Little Rev’Tails’ Ambition’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Plan Layout . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit Lagerstroemia indica Arbutus x ‘Marina’ ‘Natchez’ Ilex Myrtus communis Comprosma petriei vomitoria ‘Stoke’s ‘Compacta’Rhaphiolepis ‘Verde Vista’Dwarf’umbellata ‘Minor’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Entry Median Plan Layout . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Entry Median LED Uplight 2 per Tree 4”X16” Acker-Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Boutelou ‘Blonde , Cistus Coprosma petriei Amaryllis Ambition’‘Sunset’‘Verde Vista’ belladonna Salvia x ‘Heatwave Glitter Cercis canadensis Sage’ ‘Oklahoma’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.1.3 Uptown Sports / Transit District J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Major District Connector B East Major District Connector B Allee Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Entry Median Minor District Connector Median Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B East Plan Layout J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B East Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Vehicular and Pedestrian Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish LED Light w/ Banner Kit 4”X16” Acker-Stone Finish Warm Earth Tone Blend Platanus racemosaSilva Cell , Pennisetum ‘Bunny Bouteloua ‘Blonde Dianella revoluta Tails’ Ambition’‘Little Rev’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B Allee Plan Layout J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E TA S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B Allee Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Vehicular and Pedestrian Pedestrian LED Light Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish LED Light w/ Banner Kit Finish Platanus racemosaSilva Cell Pennisetum ‘Bunny Bouteloua ‘Blonde Dianella revoluta Tales’ Ambition’‘Little Rev’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Plan Layout J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit Lophostemon confertus Fountain Dietes ‘Variegata’ Pennisetum ‘Bunny Tales’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Plan Layout J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit Lagerstroemia indica Arbutus x ‘Marina’ ‘Natchez’ Dietes ‘Variegata’Pennisetum ‘Bunny Tales’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Entry Median Plan Layout J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Entry Median LED Uplights 2 per tree 4”X16” Acker-Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Amaryllis Boutelou ‘Blonde Cistus Coprosma petriei belladonnaAmbition’‘Sunset’‘Verde Vista’ Salvia x ‘Heatwave Glitter Cercis canadensis Sage’ ‘Oklahoma’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Median Plan Layout J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Median LED Uplights 2 per Tree 4”X16” Acker-Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Cistus x Coprosma petriei Pennisetum ‘Bunny Dietes ‘Variegata’ hybridus‘Verde Vista’Tails’ Rosa ‘Ice Westringia f. Cap’ Cercis canadensis ‘Morning Light’ ‘Oklahoma’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.1.4 Uptown Arts District J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN ARTS DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Plan Layout J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN ARTS DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit Verbena lilacina ‘De Salvia leucantha Festuca maireiLa Mina’ ‘Santa Barbara’ Sesleria autumnalis , Rhus lancea Festuca maireiMelampodium Rosa , Sesleria leucanthumcalifornicaautumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN ARTS DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Plan Layout J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN ARTS DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit Lagerstroemia indica Arbutus x ‘Marina’ ‘Natchez’ Salvia Verbena leucantha Sesleria Festuca maireililacina ‘De La Festuca maireiRosa Sesleria ‘Santa autumnalisMina’Melampodium californicaautumnalis Barbara’leucanthum Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.1.5 Creekside Village District J E F F E R S O N . D R R E T S E H C N I W E V I R D D N A L R E V O . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Major District Connector C Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector C Plan Layout . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector C Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Vehicular and Pedestrian Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish LED Light w/ Banner Kit 4”X16” Acker-Stone Finish Warm Earth Tone Blend Amaryllis Bouteloua ‘Blonde Festuca mairei belladonnaAmbition’ Podocarpus gracilior Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Plan Layout . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit Bouteloua ‘Blonde Pennisetum ‘Bunny , Sesleria Ambition’Tails’autumnalis Rhus lancea Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Plan Layout . D R R E T A S M E U Z H E C T N N I O W M A I V J E F F E R S O N A I N R O F I L A C O H C N A R Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit Bouteloua ‘Blonde Pennisetum ‘Bunny Sesleria Ambition’Tails’autumnalis Arbutus x ‘Marina’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.1.6 Gateways: Enhanced Intersections and Bulb-Outs, all Districts E . t S y r r e h C k e e r C s i d u r t r e G n a S d R r e t s e h c n i W J e " e r r s D o M n d u n r A r a i evl r t e a e C v r e O e k D i a z R d . C o m m e r c e I n C t e e n r t s e t r a t e 1 a 5 m u z e t n o M a i V Primary Gateway Secondary Gateway A k e e r C e r i p m E Secondary Gateway B tiary Gateway A tiary Gateway B Non Gateway A All Remaining Intersections a i Creek n r o f i l a Drainage Channel C o h c n Future Street a R N Enhanced Intersection and Gateway Diagram Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Primary Gateway Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Primary Gateway Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4”X16” Acker-Stone “Tile” Pattern Paving Finish Products, Cable Stamp Warm Earth Tone Color: Natural Cement Blend Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Primary Gateway Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Primary Gateway Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4”X16” Acker-Stone “Tile” Pattern Paving Finish Products, Cable Stamp Warm Earth Tone Color: Natural Cement Blend Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway A Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway A Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4”X16” Acker-Stone “Tile” Pattern Paving Finish Products, Cable Stamp Warm Earth Tone Color: Natural Cement Blend Amaryllis Boutelou ‘Blonde Cistus Coprosma petriei Salvia x belladonnaAmbition’‘Sunset’‘Verde Vista’‘Heatwave Glitter Sage’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway A Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway A Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4”X16” Acker-Stone “Tile” Pattern Paving Finish Products, Cable Stamp Warm Earth Tone Color: Natural Cement Blend Amaryllis Boutelou ‘Blonde Cistus Coprosma petriei Salvia x belladonnaAmbition’‘Sunset’‘Verde Vista’‘Heatwave Glitter Sage’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway A Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway A Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4”X16” Acker-Stone “Tile” Pattern Paving Finish Products, Cable Stamp Warm Earth Tone Color: Natural Cement Blend Amaryllis Boutelou ‘Blonde Cistus Coprosma petriei , Salvia x belladonnaAmbition’‘Sunset’‘Verde Vista’‘Heatwave Glitter Sage’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway B Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway B Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4”X16” Acker-Stone “Tile” Pattern Paving Finish Products, Cable Stamp Warm Earth Tone Color: Natural Cement Blend Amaryllis Boutelou ‘Blonde Cistus Coprosma petriei Salvia x belladonnaAmbition’‘Sunset’‘Verde Vista’‘Heatwave Glitter Sage’ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway B Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway B Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4”X16” Acker-Stone “Tile” Pattern Paving Finish Products, Cable Stamp Warm Earth Tone Color: Natural Cement Blend Santolina Iris douglasianaRosmarinus o. Salvia leucantha chamaecyparissus Sesleria Festuca mairei‘Huntington Carpet’‘Santa Barbara’ ‘Nana’autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS tiary Gateway A Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS tiary Gateway A Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish 4”X16” Acker-Stone “Tile” Pattern Paving Products, Cable Stamp Warm Earth Tone Color: Natural Cement Blend Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS tiary Gateway B Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS tiary Gateway B Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish 4”X16” Acker-Stone “Tile” Pattern Paving Finish Products, Cable Stamp Warm Earth Tone Color: Natural Cement Blend Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway A Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway A Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway A Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway A Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway A Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway A Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Sandblast Finish Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway B Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway B Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway B Plan Layout Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway B Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.2 Site Materials 3.2.1 Street Lights . t S y r r e h C k e e r C s i d u r t r e G n a S d R r e t s e h c n i W J e " e r r s D o M n d u n r A r a i evl r t e a e C v r e O e k D i a z R d . I n t e r s t a t e 1 5 k e e r C e r i p m E Major District Connector Neighborhood Street + Allee (creek side) Creek Drainage Channel Future Street a i n r o f i l a C o h c n a R N Street Light Diagram Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Types of Fixtures Major District ConnectorMinor District Connector, Neighborhood Raised Medians Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light with Banner Street and Allee (creek side)Tree Accent Uplighting Pedestrian LED Light with Banner Fixture Design Character Fixture Dome Style: Round Edge Arm Mounted Fixture and Ball Center CapFixture Character ImageFinish: Dark Bronze Textured FinishPole Base Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.2.2 Tree Grates 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting Tree Grate Character Image Silva Cell Enlarged Section Simulation Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.3 Other Site Elements 3.3.1 Site Furnishings 3.3.2 Utilities and Equipment in the ROW 3.3.3 Bus Shelters 3.3.4 Art Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.3.5 Signage District and Neighborhood Signage Way"nding Signage Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1 Materials Schedules 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District 4.1.3 Site Furnishing Product Cut Sheets 4.2 Strategies for Low Impact Development 4.2.1 Recommended Low Impact Development Plant List 4.0 APPENDIX 4.0 Material Schedules 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Center District SpeciesCommon NameContainer Mature FormWater Notes SizeSizeNeeds Major District Connector A Major District Connector C Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Secondary Gateway A Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Hotel / Tourism District SpeciesCommon NameContainer Mature FormWater Notes SizeSizeNeeds Major District Connector A Major District Connector B East and Allee Neighborhood Street Entry Median Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Sports / Transit District SpeciesCommon NameContainer Mature FormWater Notes SizeSizeNeeds Major District Connector B East and Allee Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Entry Median Minor District Connector Median Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Sports / Transit District (Continued) SpeciesCommon NameContainer Mature FormWater Notes SizeSizeNeeds Secondary Gateway A Uptown Arts District SpeciesCommon NameContainer Mature FormWater Notes SizeSizeNeeds Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Arts District (Continued) SpeciesCommon NameContainer Mature FormWater Notes SizeSizeNeeds Secondary Gateway B Creekside Village District SpeciesCommon NameContainer Mature FormWater Notes SizeSizeNeeds Major District Connector C Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Creekside Village District (Continued) SpeciesCommon NameContainer Mature FormWater Notes SizeSizeNeeds Secondary Gateway A Secondary Gateway B Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Center District ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Major District Connector A Major District Connector C Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Center District (Continued) ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Primary Gateway and Secondary Gateway A Non-Gateway Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Hotel / Tourism District ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Major District Connector A Major District Connector B East Major District Connector B Allee Neighborhood Street Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Hotel / Tourism District (Continued) ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Entry Median 2 per Tree Non-Gateway Uptown Sports / Transit District ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Major District Connector B East Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Sports / Transit District (Continued) ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Major District Connector B Allee Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Entry Median Minor District Connector Median Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Sports / Transit District (Continued) ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Primary Gateway and Secondary Gateway A Non-Gateway Uptown Arts District ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Minor District Connector Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Arts District (Continued) ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Neighborhood Street Secondary Gateway B Tertiary Gateway Non-Gateway Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Creekside Village District ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Major District Connector C Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street Primary Gateway and Secondary Gateway A Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Creekside Village District (Continued) ProductManufacturer / ModelFinishDimensionsNotes Secondary Gateway B Tertiary Gateway Non-Gateway Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.3 Site Furnishing Product Cut Sheets Product Cut Sheets Street Light Description Kit Manufacturer: Product Number: Finish: Pole Height: Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Pedestrian Light Description Manufacturer: Product Number: Finish: Pole Height / Mounting Height: Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Pedestrian Light (Continued) Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Tree Grate Description Manufacturer: Product Number: Finish: Dimensions: Tree Hole Diameter: Finish: Natural Cast Iron Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Silva Cell Description Manufacturer: deeproot Product Number: Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.0 APPENDIX 4.2 Strategies for Low Impact Development T CASQA LID Stormwater Management Standard Detail for Reference Only Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX Differences between Sloped and Ponding Surfaces: Plant Selection for LIDs: Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX Planting Soils for LIDs: Pedestrian Safety and Access: Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.2.1 Recommended Low Impact Development Plant List Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards