Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-075 CC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 93-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AMENDMIENT NO. 2 TO THE MURRIET.A- CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN WHEREAS, on January 8, 1991, by Resolution No. 91-02, the City Council adopted the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and Fee Update which implements area-wide flood control and Fee update which implements area-wide flood control projects directly benefitting the City of Temecula; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 1993, the County of Riverside, with Resolution No. 93-100, adopted Amendment No. 2 to the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and revised drainage fees for the five subwatersheds within the drainage area of the plan; and WHEREAS, a noticed public hearing has been held by the City Council at which time all interested persons had the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matter of adopting the revised schedule of drainage fees; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and a Notice of Exemption has been prepared. Section 2. Subdivision and development of property within the planned local drainage area will require the construction of the facilities described in the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan. Section 3. The revised estimated cost of the facilities and the recommended revised drainage fees are correct, necessary and fairly apportioned within the drainage area, both on the basis of the need for drainage facilities created by the proposed subdivision and development of all properties within the drainage area. Section 4. The City of Temecula hereby adopts Exhibits "A-1 through A-4" attached hereto as Amendment No. 2 to the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and revised drainage fees for the five subwatersheds within the drainage area of the plan. Resos 93-75 1 Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. J.Mufioz, Ma@or ATTEST: J e Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) 1, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 93-75 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 14th day of September, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Stone, Mufioz NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts -a. @e-/S. Greek, City Clerk Resos 93-75 2 Plannincr Departrnent Notice of Exemptio-. TC County Clerk and Recarticr3 Office ]FROM: PI---i-c Dcpan=cnt County of Riverside City of Te=ccuia P.O. Box 751 43174 Business Park I)nve River-side, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Murriem Creek Arta Project Title: -c Plan Fees Description of Project:Adoption of an Amendment to an Ordinance to CoUect drainaoe fees fc subdivisions Project Location:City Wide, in the City of Tem@ County of Pdverside, California. Project Applicant/Proponent:City of Temecula 7le Plannin- Commission X City Council approved the above desaibed projea on August 24, 1993, -an@ found that the project is exempt fmm the provisions of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, as amended. F-xempt Status: (check one) MinisEerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); Sec. 15268); Declared E=ergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); Sec. 15269(a)); r-=ergency Project (Ser-. 21080(b)(4); Sec. L5269(b)(c)); St-n,tory Exemptions (Section Number. C@goncal Exe=pcion: C@ Other: Section 15061(b)(3) (Section Nu=ber Statement of R=ons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: 7ne project will ciewly have no impacts on the environment since the f= a= already adopted and they are only b@ increased. Contact Person/7'ltle: Gary g Dire=r Phone Numbcr-. (909) 69@ 5 i -,nani re: Date: R:%ZPLKMINGIMUR NOE U13193 2.The revised estimated cost of the facilities and the 2recommended revised drainage fee are correct, necessary and 3fairly apportioned within the drainage area, both on the basis 0- 4benefit conferred on properties that are proposed for subdivision 5and on the need for drainage facilities that is created by the 6 proposed subdivision and development of all properties within the 7drainage area. 8 9 3. Amendment No. 2 to the Hurrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan I 10dated April 6, 1993, and on file in the office of the Clerk of this Board, is adopted-and the drainage fee for the five 12subwatersheds within the drainage area is fixed in the amount of 13$4,952 per acre (Wildomar Valley) ; $4,139 per acre (Murrieta 14 Valley); $2,291 per acre (Temecula Valley); $1,179 per acre 1-5 (Santa Gertrudis Valley) $677 per acre (Warm Springs Valley) . 16 17 4. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 90-059 adopte@ 18, an January 23, 1990. lc )1 20 21 ZS:mcv 22 1 resf92m 23i 24 25 26 27 281 -2- AXENDMENT 2 TABLE I MURRIETA CR--EK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN COST SUWMRY i Santa Warm Area Wildomar Murrieta Temecula Gertrudis Springs Drainage Valley Valley valley Valley valley Plan Facility Total Cost Total Cost Total- Cost Total Cost Total,Cost Total Cost M,w Hurrieta 6,412,213 26,387,069 10,003,869 11,065,'186 lo,869,639 64,737,976 Creek Channel .7,132,924 7,132,924 H Santa Gert. Ch 2,164,081 2,164,081 M Warm Springs Ch. 169,902 169,902 M Line A 152,473 152,473 H Line C 104,513 104,513 M Line C-1 2,975,792 2,975,792 H Line D 403,635 M Line D-1 403,635 2,587,109 X Line E 2,587,109 283,451 M Line E-1 283,451 536,366 M Line E-2 536,366 114,376 M Line E-3 114,376 288,803 M Line E-4 288,803 84,884 M Line E-5 84,884 4,134,481 M Line F 4,134,481 1,720,108 M Line F-1 1,720,108 llo,171 M Line F-2 110,171 591,012 M Line F-3 591,012 1,412,416 M Line G 1,412,416 486,549 Line H 486,549 1,611,457 .1 Line J 1,611,457 675,847 M Line X 675,847 7'59,655 H Line L 759,655 60,787 M Line L-1 60,787 176,591 M Line M 176,591 94,869 M Line M-1 94,869 610,736 M Line N 610,736 583,306 M Line P 583,306 408,538 408,538 y Hwv 79 Crossing 793,407 793,407 crossing 2,291,877 W WLldomar Ch. 2,291,877 668,804 W Lateral A 668,804 604,644 W Lateral B 604,644 312,225 w Lateral B-1 312,225 2,237,497 W Lateral C 2,237,497 303,424 W Lateral C-1 303,424 17,688 W Line D 17,688 6oo,122 W Lateral E 600,122 27,221 W Lateral E-1 27,221 255,229 w wildomar Ch. 255,229 Debris Basin 495,152 W Lateral A 495,152 Debris Basin Subarea S13,442,258 Totals $14,226,096 $46,689,471 $10,430,757 $18,991,517 Grand Total $103,780,099 Y Li,- CT OL21 C--zt C.-e--k C--rtr-@iz @.. 2 C I LI-it -! c ne -IC Z.@ 66i.= 34:; , = 256,= 2. '.f WiIAC=ar C-. r--.z @in amove i.@ude ui) YXU- el zi T 13z.= IZT, =0 as,= OCO 7i g-, r---o 2--a, 973,= 7@c-f p I-zn 147,= Z4-, 2?7, OCO 13S.CcO 1,760,= 5,CCO Be&,= 669,= AFA,= VA,= =-id @.%!==xLton) @@L CC way Icr-@ pre--i=@t @ '-,-%,c @@-zzlcn 04 or W) reterz t:oc a -acc @-Lr 34t 0-@l-rca or W"lc5=ar) a the prpli-ln@ d=lvz ;Linz can b-- f@. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSTOE 2 RESOLUTION NO. 93-100 4 AMENDING THE MURRI=A CREEK DRAINAGE PLAN 5 6 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 86-29, adopted by this Board on May 76, 1986, implementing the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan, 8directs the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation 91District to review the plan at least every two years and to 10prepare an update of the plan that reflects changed conditions 11and any required changes in facility cost estimates and drainage 12fees; and, 13 14i'i WHEREAS, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water 15Conservation District has recommended the adoption of an ame( 16ment to the plan -increasing- the amount of the drainage fee in 17 order to reflect inflationary trends in construction and right of is way costs; now, therefore, 19 20 BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Board of Super- 21 visors of the County of Riverside, State of California, in 22regular session assembled on April 6, 1993, that; 23 24i 1. The project is exempt from the provisions of the Cali- 25 fornia Environmental Quality Act and a Notice of Exemption has 26been prepared. 27 28! Plannincr Departrnent Notice of Exemptior- TC County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Piart"ing Depanment Counry of Riverside City of Te=cc,.iia P.C. Box 751 43174 Business Park I)nve Rive=ide, CA 92501-VSI Te=ecuix, CA 92590 Project Title: Murriem Cr=k Area. -e Plan Fees Description of Project:i Adoption of an Amendment to an Ordinance to COlleCt drainage fees for subdivisions Project Location:City Wide, in the City of Tem@ County of Riverside,. California. Project Applicant/@ponent:City of Temecula 'ne Plannin- Commission X City Council approved the above described project on Aug= 24, 1993, -and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the CaLifomia Envirommenmi Quality Act, as amended. F-xempt Status: (check one) M@erial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); Scr-. 15268); Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); Sec. 15269(a)); Emergency Pro*t (Sec. 21080(b)(4); Sec. 15269(b)(c)); Stamwry Exe=ptions (Section Number. Cuagoncal Exempticz&: Claw (Section Number Other: Section 15061(b)(3) Statement of R=ons Supporting the Finding that the Project is F-Xempt: 7ne project will clearly have no impa= on the enviro=ent since the fees are @y adopted and they are only being increased. Contact Person/Title: Gary g Dirt=or Phone Number- (909) 69 Signature: Date: P:%MPLANNINC%MURCREELNOE 2113M t)s AMENDMENT NO. 2- TO MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN Adopted Apr@l 6, 1993 Resolution No. 93-100 Updating Requirement - This amendment is prepared in accordance with Riverside County Board of Supervisors Resolution No. 86-29 'Adopting Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan', which states in part: -that the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is directed to prepare an update of this plan at least every two years to reflect changed conditions, inflationary or deflationary trends, revised general or specific plans, and approved development and drainage plans which will require changes in facility configuration cost estimates and .drainage fees.' Facility Changes - No changes have been made on the facilities since the adoption of Amendment No. 1 in January 1990. New Facilities - Murrieta Line F-3, Santa Gertrudis Channel, Wildomar Lateral A are all 100% complete. Warm Springs Channel, Murrieta Line F-1, Wildomar Channel and Wildomar Lateral C are all partially constructed. Future Facilities - Lines F, 0 and E are presently being designed. Recommendations - It is the- District's recommendation that the Board revise the drainage fees for the five subwatersheds to reflect inflationary trends in construction and right of way cost. The increase in construction cost is based upon new costing quantities using 1992 unit prices. Right of way cost are based upon the recommendations of the County's Real Property Management Division. 2.The revised estimated cost of the f acuities and the 211 recommended revised drainage f ee are correct, necessary and fairly apportioned within the drainage area, both on the basis c,- 4benefit conferred on properties that are proposed for subdiv' ' isic 5 and on the need for drainage facilities that is created by the 6 proposed subdivision and development of all properties within the 7 drainage area. 8 9 3.Amendment No. 2 to the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan 10 dated April 6, 1993, and on file in the office of the Clerk of this Board, is adopted -and the drainage f ee f or the f ive 121 1 subwatersheds within the drainage area is fixed in the amount of 13 I 1 $4,952 per acre (Wildomar Valley) ; $4,139 per acre (Murrieta 14Valley); $2,291 per acre (Temecula valley); $1,179 per acre 15 16(Santa Gertrudis Valley) $677 per acre (Warm Springs Valley) 17 4. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 90-059 adopt@ 18, on January 23, 1990. 19 20 211 ZS:mcv 22 resf92m 231 24 25 26 271 281 AMENDMENT.NO, 2 MURRIETA CREEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN REVISED DRAINAGE FEES The current drainage fees for the five sub-watersheds are: Sub-Watershed Fee Percentage Applied Toward Local Major Facilities Facilities *H.C. *S.G. *W.S. Wildomar valley $49S2/acre 54.93% 45.07% 0 0 Murrieta Valley $4139/acre 43.48% 56.52% 0 0 Temecula Valley $2291/acre 4.09% 95.91% 0 0 Santa Gertrudis Valley $1179/acre 4.18% 58.26% 37.56% 0 Warm Springs Valley 5 677/acre 3.04% 80.86% 0 16.10% *M.C. = Hurrieta Creek Channel *S.G. = Santa Gertrudis Channel *W.S. = Warm Springs Channel ZS:mcv adD7a AMENDKENT 2 TABLE I HURRIETA CR-VEK AREA DRAINAGE PLAN COST SU@RY i Santa Warm Area Wildomar Hurrieta Temecula Gertrudls Springs Drainage Valley valley Valley Valley Valley Plan Fac;-lity 'Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total Cost M,W Hurrieta 6,412,213 26,387,069 10,003,869 11,065,'186 10,869,639 64,737,976 Creek Channel 7,132,924 7,132,924 H Santa Gert. Ch 2,164,081 2,164,081 M Warm SDrings Ch. 169,902 169,902 H Line A M Line C 152,473 152,473 H Line C-1 104,Sl3 104,513 M Line 0 2,975,792 2,975,792 H Line D-1 403,635 403,635 M Line E 2,SS7,109 2,587,109 M Line E-1 283,451 283,451 H Line E-2 536,366 536,366 M Line E-3 114,376 114,376 288,803 M Line E-4 288,803 M Line E-5 84,884 84,884 4,134,481 M Line F 4,134,481 1,720,108 M Line F-I 1,720,108 110,171 M Line F-2 110,171 591,012 M Line F-3 591,012 1,412,416 H Line G 1,412,416 486,549 Line H 486,549 1,611,457 i Line J 1,611,457 675,847 M Line K 675,847 759,65! H Line L 759,655 60,78-@ H Line L-1 60,787 176,591 M Line M 176,591 94,869 H Line M-1 94,869 610,736 M Line N 610,736 583,306 M Line P 583,306 408,538 408,538 M Hwv 79 Crossing KR3 Crossing 793,407 793,407 W Wildomar Ch. 2,291,877 2,291,87-7 W Lateral A 668,804 668,804 W Lateral B 604,644 604,644 312,225 W Lateral B-1 312,225 2,237,497 W Lateral C 2,237,497 303,424 W Lateral C-1 303,424 1-7,688 W Line D 17,688 600,122 W Lateral E 60C,122 27,221 W Lateral E-1 27,221 255,229 W wildomar Ch. 255,229 Debris Basin 495,152 W Lateral A 495,152 Debris Basin Subarea Totals $14,226,096 $46,689,471 $10,430,757 $18,991,517 S13,442,258 Grand Total $103,780,099 AIUR) TEAIJ MURRIETA CREEI( AREA DRAINAGE PLAN -E5 C=,- SL@.x77 '(?=-@@us cer-_-wiz 'jar= lzrl--S: Y all- a!, valley valley Valle-y YZL:.CF 'CL21 C--=-- 1;7,= L C .20.7 -LS5. ccc -la 43S.Cco =:I,= coo 2'5 1. e r-7 399 se. 591 CCO 1 sa , F-CO isa.coo 719, P-M 1-7 . =0 ?.WV 73 C:-=zzlns 6415, ==.zr 669,= 6i3i.= 2fj6,= la, --o zzt,= conlt,,Igcmizs a-A !'-ZZL OC yl'f Icr-@ present &= @@@@on Ot or retera -aLe @-gr 34* 0-@. -=La or WI d=ar) c the Pr cicsl.=% PI== can b-- f@.