Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout99-104 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 99-104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT NO ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970, AS AMENDED AND THE GUIDELINES PROMULGATED THEREUNDER REGARDING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA99-0285 (AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219); PA99-0283 (DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE VILLAGES @ PASEO DEL SOL, COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER); PA99-0284 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA99-0286 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 29431). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula, after public hearing and deliberation, does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: a. The four Planning Applications submitted by the "Applicant", identified as PA99-0285 (Amendment No. 7 to Specific Plan No. 219); PA99-0283 (Development Agreement for the Villages @ Paseo Del Sol, Community Shopping Center); PA99-0284 (Development Plan) and PA99-0286 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 29431 ), (collectively "the Applications") are intended to cause the development of a portion of Specific Plan No. 219, as amended, with a retail commercial development. The Development Agreement details the rights and privileges of the Applicant in regards to the implementation of the development allowed by Specific Plan No. 219, as amended and the Development Plan. Tentative Parcel Map No. 29431 subdivides the subject real property in furtherance of the permitted development rights and privileges. These four Planning Applications, together with the previously approved components of the Specific Plan No. 219 collectively are referenced herein as the "Project". b. The area affected by the Applications is located generally at the southwestern quadrant of Specific Plan No. 219, as amended. The Project is located on and within a geographic area that has been the subject of several prior environmental investigations, all of which were in furtherance of the physical development of Specific Plan No. 219, as amended. The Applications individually and cumulatively address the circumstances attendant to each individual Planning Application and make findings supporting the approval of each. Section 2. The City Coundl hereby finds and determines that, pursuant to statutory requirements of Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and based upon the review of the evidence, including the pdor Environmental Impact Report identified as E.I.R. No. 235, which EIR was certified by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on September 6, 1988, and as the same has been considered pursuant to Amendments Nos. 1 (1992)and 2 (1992), as previously Resos\99-104 I adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula, and the pending Addendum No. 3, no further environmental analysis is required. Pursuant to '14 California Code of Regulations Section `15162, no further environmental review is required on this Project because no evidence as required by `14 California Code of Regulation Sections `15`163 or '15'164 to require either a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR has been presented to this City Council. Neither a Subsequent EIR nor a Supplemental EIR is required for the Project based on the following findings of the Agency: a. All of the private elements of the Project and the Public Improvements were contemplated and fully and properly analyzed in the Ell:{ certified and approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. b. There have been no subsequent changes to the Project which would require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. c. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. d. There is no new information since the certification of the previous EIR which would show or tend to show that the Project might have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR. e. There is no new information since the certification of the previous EIR which would show or tend to show that significant effects previously examined might be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR. f. There is no new information since the certification of the previous EIR which would show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project. g. There is no new information since the certification of the previous EIR which would show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the adoption of this Resolution and the findings set forth above and deems this Resolution applicable to the Applications. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Resos\99-104 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of City of Temecula this 9th day of November, 1999. d, Mayor ATTEST: ~y~eF~~J~ JO%S,,~ [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 99-104 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 9th day of November, 1999, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Comerchero, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford None None St san W. MC/AAE ~ty Clerk Resos\99-104 3