Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-108 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 03-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0653, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL COMPLEX, ATHLETIC FIELDS AND RELATED FACILITIES, AND FUTURE RESIDENTIAL AREA FOR UP TO 26 RESIDENTS ON A 94 ACRE SITE, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARK~NAY AND EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 955-002-002. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and A. Karen Raftery, Linfield Christian School, filed Planning Application No. PA01- 0653, a Conditional Use Permit to establish a master plan and design guidelines for a private school complex, athletic fields and related facilities and a future residential area for up to 26 residents on a 94 acres site located between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road, west of Meadows Parkway and east of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 955-002-002 ("Project"). B. The application for the Project was processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on May 21, 2003 to consider the application for the Project. D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2003-033, recommending that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA01-0653, a Conditional Use Permit to establish a master plan and design guidelines for a private school complex, athletic fields and related facilities and a future residential area for up to 26 residents on a 94 acres site located between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road, west of Meadows Parkway and east of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 955-002-002 E. On August 26, 2003, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. F. On August 26, 2003, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the R:/Resos 2003/Resos 03-108 1 Project when it adopted Resolution No. 03-107, which was prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072. Section 2. In approving the Conditional Use Permit to establish a master plan and design guidelines for a private school complex, athletic fields and related facilities and a future residential area for up to 26 residents on a 94 acres site, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposed project is consistent with the Land Use Element of the general plan. The PDO meets the purpose and intent of as conditional use permit as defined in section 17.04.010A of the Development Code. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of the adjacent uses, buildings and structures, because the proposed uses are similar or function similar to the surrounding uses in the immediate area, which includes schools and single family residences. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the development code and required by the Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood because the project has been proposed in a manner that the site can accommodate the necessary improvements including fencing, walls, yards, parking, loading areas, landscaping, buffer areas and other features prescribed in the PDO text and Master Plan and Design Guidelines. In addition, the projec~ includes conditions of approval and a mitigation monitoring program that ensure the project integrates the use with other uses in the neighborhood. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the general welfare of the community because the proposed PDO is consistent with the land use surrounding the project site, which includes residential and educational facilities. The applicant has submitted traffic reports and staff has concluded that the 26 additional residences will not have a negative impact, therefore additional improvements will not be required. E. The decision to approve that portion of Planning Application No. PA01-0653, a Conditional Use Permit to establish a master plan and design guidelines for a private school complex, athletic fields and related facilities and a future residential area for up to 26 residents on a 94 acres site was based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the City Council. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Planning Application No. PA01-0653, a Conditional Use Permit to establish a master plan and design guidelines for a private school complex, athletic fields and related facilities and a future residential area for up to 26 residents on a 94 acres site located between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road, west of Meadows Parkway and east of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 955-02-002, subject to the specific conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. R:/Resos 2003/Resos 03-108 2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August, 2003 ~ ~)'~ '"Je rff~'~y E. Stone, Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 03-108 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of August, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: N°ne~~n~W~~, R:/Resos 2003/Resos 03-108 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:/Resos 2003/Resos 03-108 4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA01-0653 (Conditional Use Permit) Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit to establish future educational, recreational, institutional, and residential facilities on 93.77 acres and to adopt a Master Plan and Design Guidelines Assessor's Parcel No.: 955-002-002 Approval Date: August 26, 2003 Expiration Date: August 26, 2005 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($1,314.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. All these conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application NO. PA01-0653 and PA02-0612). A follow-up raptor survey shall be prepared and submitted to staff for review as recommended in the raptor nesting survey, prepared by L & L Environmental Inc., dated March 21, 2002. Said survey shall take place during the raptor-breeding season as recommended by a qualified biologist. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations and Master Plan Document dated February 21, 2003, on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division, unless superceded by these conditions of approval. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. The Applicant shall submit ten (10) copies of the Amended Master Plan and Design Guidelines document to the Planning Department within 30 days of the approval date. The following revisions are required: a. The Master Plan shall be revised to eliminate the word Master for Master Conditional Use Permit in all locations of the Master Plan and Design Guidelines. b. Section 2.4.8 on page 16 of the Master Plan and Design Guidelines shall be revised to read as follows: "Based upon the available net acreage of the site and building design, a maximum of 26 residences may be developed within Planning Area 2?' c. A section shall be added requiring Planning Area 2 to provide a direct access path intended for vehicular and/or pedestrians to the main campus facility. d. Language indicating that only those trees existing immediately adjacent to parking lots shall be included in the required count of parking lot trees. e. The bottom line of the front cover sheet of the Master Plan document to read: For Conditional Use Permit PA01-0653. f. The Design Guidelines shall include specific language that student drop-off zones adjacent to residential zones are to be enhanced by the landscaping of shrubs and trees. g. All exhibits within the Master Plan shall be revised to be consistent with each other, as shown on exhibit 2.2.B. h. Table 3.4.3 shall be revised to indicate the use of Mosco lighting for recreation fields and courts. i. Section 3.2.2 shall be revised to include stucco finish as a permitted finish. j. Section 3.3.5 shall be revised to include vinyl fencing as a type of fencing permitted. The fencing plan. Figure 3.3.5 must be revised to accurately reflect the type of fencing existing and proposed, including height and type and provide separate symbols for each type of fencing. Language indicating that mitigation and landscaping for the drainage course located along the western portion of the project site will be required and determined by the California Department of Fish and Game as part of the 1603 permit should be included into the Master Plan text. The area immediately south east of the lake should be identified as habitat area and planted with native habitat to support this issue. This should be clearly labeled on the exhibits in the Master Plan and included in the text document. Delete Cortaderia selloana from Table 3.3.6 unless sterile varieties are used. Delete Schinus terebinthifolius from Table 3.3.6, as it is not zoned for the Temecula area. Language indicating wall vines and additional appropriate trees shall be provided along retaining walls. Add the following language into the Master Plan and Design Guidelines: 1) Structures existing on the Linfield Christian School campus as of the date of adoption of this ordinance shall be considered "grandfathered' in regard to any new development standards, setbacks, and design guidelines adopted subsequent to the original construction date of these facilities. 2) All new development occurring in PDO-7 shall be in substantial conformance with the Linfield Christian School Master Plan Design Guidelines approved in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit # PA01-0653. 3) Future Development in Planning Area 2 shall be consistent with the design theme, materials, and color palette established for the main campus in Planning Area lA, as set forth in the Master CUP and Design Guidelines for the Linfield Christian School. In Planning Area 3, the design and architecture shall be consistent with the currently approved plans for the Golf College Training Facility. In the event this use is not established, future development in Planning Area 3 shall conform to the Design Guidelines established for Planning Area lA in the Master CUP for the Linfield Christian School. 4) Buildings constructed with pre-finished metal panels and set on a permanent foundation are permissible for maintenance and storage buildings within Planning Area 1. Said buildings shall be treated with rust-proof, powder coated paints, and shall be consistent with the main color theme established for the campus. 5) Chain link fencing located at property boundaries adjacent to residential uses shall incorporate vines or screening hedges to provide greater privacy. Installation of screening plant materials along existing fences shall be provided in conjunction with the Development Plan approval for the affected Development Sub-Area, as shown in the Master CUP for the Linfield Christian School. 10. The lighting plan shall be revised and submitted to staff to verify consistency with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. Lighting proposed adjacent to residential lots shall be setback twice the distance of the height of the fixture up to 25 feet. All lighting shall be fully shielded and directed down and reduce glare onto adjacent parcels. 11. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. 12. The Master Plan and Design Guidelines shall be amended to include text stating that metal buildings shall only be permitted for utility type structures related to maintenance uses and shall be located in locations not visible from the public view (Added at City Council hearing 8/26/63). 13. The Master Plan and Design Guidelines shall be amended to include text stating that any substantial deviation from the Master Plan and Design Guidelines shall require approval by the Planning Commission (Added at City Council hearing 8126103). FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 14. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at the time of building, plan submittal. 15. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 4850 GPM with a 4-hour duration. The required fire flow for each building may vary and may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) COMMUNITY SERVICES 16. Prior to issuance of a building permit additional residential units will be subject to Quimby in-lieu fees calculated in accordance with Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance 16.33 and will be due prior to the issuance of any building permits for these new dwellings. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Name printed Date