Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-124 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 03-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF, IN CONNECTION WITH THE WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENT OF WINCHESTER ROAD (26419 YNEZ ROAD) THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, FIND, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Temecula is a municipal corporation, in the County of Riverside, State of California. Section 2. The real property interests described in Section 3 of this Resolution are to be taken for a public use, namely for permanent easements and temporary construction easements in connection with the proposed widening and improvements of Winchester Road ("Project"), and all uses necessary or convenient thereto, pursuant to the authority conferred upon the City of Temecula to acquire property by eminent domain by California Constitution Article 1, Section 19, California Government Code sections 37350, 37350.5, 37351,40401, and 40404 and California Code of Civil Procedure section 1230.010, et seq. (Eminent Domain Law), including, but not limited to sections 1240.010, 1240.020, 1240.110, 1240.120, 1240.150, 1240.410, 1240.510, 1240.610, 1240.650 and other provisions of law. Section 3. The real property interests the City seeks to acquire are a permanent street easement and temporary construction easement on the property commonly known as 26419 Ynez Road, Temecula, and identified as Assessor's Parcel Number ("APN") 910-300-013 ("Subject Property Interests"). The legal description of the Subject Property Interests are attached as Exhibits "A" to this Resolution and depicted on Exhibits "B" to this Resolution. Said Exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference. Specifically, the legal description of the permanent easement on Assessor's Parcel Number ("APN") 910-300-013 is shown on Exhibit "A," which is marked on the top right hand corner with the job number ("JN") 10101661-M7. This permanent easements is depicted on Exhibit "B" also marked with JN 10101661-M7. The legal description of the temporary construction easement is shown on Exhibit "A," which is marked on the top right hand corner with JN 10101661-M19, and depicted on Exhibit "B" also marked with JN 10101661-M19. The Subject Property Interests are required for the construction, widening, and improvements of Winchester Road, which is a public use. Section 4. The Project is consistent with the City's General Plan and with the Harveston Specific Plan. The Project would widen and improve Winchester Road easterly from Jefferson Avenue to approximately 885 feet east of Ynez Road. Specifically, the Project would provide additional through lanes and turning lanes at the intersections of Winchester and Ynez Roads, Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue and Winchester and Margarita Roads. The Project would improve Winchester Road at the 1-15 southbound ramp by adding an eastbound right-turn lane, a southbound dedicated left-turn lane (dual left), and widening the off-ramp to accommodate the added lane. The Project would also improve the Winchester Road at 1-15 northbound ramp by adding a westbound right-turn lane (dual right). These improvements will further the public health and safety by ensuring adequate traffic circulation in this area and, R:/Resos 2003/Resos 03-124 I thus, will prevent unacceptable traffic congestion and unsafe conditions. The Project is also necessary for the public health and safety because it will ensure that traffic circulation and the level of service are maintained at the standard set forth in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. The Project is also necessary to meet the demands of anticipated increased traffic volumes in the area resulting from recent and proposed development in the vicinity of the Project area. Section 5. The potential environmental impacts of the Project were studied and analyzed as an integral part of the City Council's adoption on August 14, 2001 of Resolution No. 01-70. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula Certifying the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Harveston Specific Plan and related actions, and adopting the findings pursuant to the California Environmental Act, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and a Mitigation Monitoring Program in connection therewith for the Harveston Specific Plan, located east of Interstate 15, north of Santa Gertrudis Creek, west of Margarita Road and south of the northern City limits (Planning Application 00-0189). The street improvements that make up the Project were a condition of approval of the Harveston Specific Plan and related planning applications. Pursuant to section 15082 of the State California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines, the City on April 1, 1999 issued a Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report ("Draft EIR"). The City received comments in response to the Notice of Preparation. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168, the City prepared a Draft EIR to analyze potential adverse environmental impacts of the Harveston Specific Plan. Upon completion of the Draft EIR, the City on November 2, 2000, filed a Notice of Completion with the State Office of Planning and Research. This initiated a 45-day public comment period pursuant to section 15105 of the CEQA Guidelines. Also, in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City published a Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR in a newspaper of general circulation. The City sent copies of the Draft EIR to public agencies, organizations, and individuals. The City also placed copies of the Draft EIR in public libraries throughout Riverside County and in City offices. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21092.5, the City on February 2001, provided its responses to the fourteen (14) comments received on the Draft EIR. These comments and responses were included as part of the Final EIR. Pursuant to CEQA, in adopting Resolution No. 01-70, the City Council determined that based on all of the evidence presented, including the Final EIR, written and oral testimony given at meetings and hearings, and submission of testimony from the public, organizations, and regulatory agencies, certain environmental impacts associated with the Harveston Specific Plan and related actions will have a less than significant impact on the environment and therefore do not require the imposition of mitigation measures. Specifically, the City Council determined that the Harveston Specific Plan and related actions will not result in conflicts or inconsistencies with the applicable goals and policies of the Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Open Space/Conservation, Growth ManagementJPublic Facilities, Public Safety, Noise, Air Quality, Community Design, and Economic Development Elements of the City of Temecula General Plan. The City Council also determined that the Harveston Specific Plan and related actions will have a potentially significant impact on transportation and circulation in the City. It determined that that there will be an increase in traffic levels under the Phase I - 2002 Scenario. At Phase I, the build-out of the Harveston Specific Plan and related actions are R:/Resos2003/Resos 03-124 2 anticipated to generate approximately 12,515 trips per day. All of the study intersections, including those that are part of the Project, were found to operate at LOS "D" or better at all times, with the exception of Winchester Road at Ynez Road and Winchester Road at Margarita Road. Accordingly, because this is considered a significant impact, intersection improvements were identified to allow LOS "D" or better to be maintained at both of these intersections and, thus, reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Specifically, the mitigation measures required a modification of the signal at Winchester Road at Ynez Road to provide both a northbound and southbound right turn overlap phase. The mitigation measures also required the addition of an eastbound through lane on Winchester Road at this intersection. These improvements are part of the Project. In addition, the mitigation measures required certain improvements at the intersection of Winchester and Margarita Roads. The City Council found that with the implementation of certain mitigation measures, the Harveston Specific Plan and related actions' incremental impact on traffic at the projected 2005 build-out scenario can be reduced to a less than significant level. These mitigation measures include the improvements proposed by the Project and discussed above in Section 4. Accordingly, the City Council found and determined that with the implementation of the Harveston Specific Plan and related applications, including the Harveston Specific Plan Circulation Element and mitigation measures, no significant traffic impacts will result from the Harveston Specific Plan and related applications under the Phase I - 2002 and Full Build-out 2005 Scenarios. The Project is comprised of all of the improvements or mitigation measures required by the Final EIR and set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program in connection with Winchester Road and the intersections of Winchester Road and Ynez Road, Winchester Road and Jefferson Avenue, Winchester Road at the I-15, and Winchester Road and Margarita Road. In adopting Resolution No. 01-70, the City Council found that it reviewed and considered the Final EIR in evaluating the Harveston Specific Plan, that the Final EIR is an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City's local CEQA Guidelines. Further, the City Council found that the Final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. Accordingly, the City Council certified the Final EIR based on the following findings and conclusions: A. Findings. The following significant impacts have been identified in the Draft EIR and will require mitigation as set forth in Section 4 of Resolution No. 01-70 but cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance: long-term and short-term project and cumulative air quality impacts. B. Conclusions. 1. All significant environmental impacts from implementation of the Harveston Specific Plan have been identified in the Draft EIR and, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified, will be mitigated to a level of insignificance, except for those impacts listed in Section 6.1 of Resolution No. 01-70. 2. Other reasonable alternatives to the Harveston Specific Plan, which could feasibly achieve the basic objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan, have been considered and rejected in favor of the Harveston Specific Plan. R:/Resos 2003/Resos 03-124 3 3. Environmental, economic, social and other considerations and benefits derived from the development of the Harveston Specific Plan override and make infeasible any alternatives to the Harveston Specific Plan or further mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the Harveston Specific Plan. All of the environmental documentation prepared in connection with Resolution No. 01- 70, including the Final EIR and the Mitigation Monitoring Program, has been reviewed by City staff in connection with the proposed Resolutions of Necessity and on August 4, 2003, pursuant to the criteria of Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines and Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code, staff concluded that no substantial changes have occurred in the Harveston Specific Plan and related applications, of which the street improvements proposed by the Project are an integral part, and that the City has not obtained any new information of substantial importance that would require City staff to undertake further environmental analysis. These environmental findings in connection with the Harveston Specific Plan and related applications and the conditions imposed as part of their approval, are the appropriate findings with respect to (he proposed acquisition of the Subject Property Interests. Section 6. The public use for which the City seeks to acquire the subject property interests, namely street purposes, is a more necessary public use within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.650 than the uses to which public utility easement holders have appropriated those utility easements, which are located in the Subject Property Interests and are affected by the Project. Section 7. that: The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds and determines A. The public interest and necessity require the Project; B. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury; C. The property described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto is necessary for the Project; and D. The City made the offer required by section 7267.2 of the Government Code to the owners of record. Section 8. The findings and declarations contained in this Resolution are based upon the record before the City Council on August 12, 2003 and September 16, 2003, including the Agenda Report dated August 12, 2003 and September 16, 2003 and all documents referenced therein, all of which are incorporated by this reference. These documents include the environmental documents referenced above, Resolution Nos. 01-70, 01-72, 01-73, Ordinance No. 01-08, the City's General Plan, and Development Code. These documents also include the Project Construction Plans, which were approved by the State of California Department of Transportation. The findings and declarations in this Resolution are also based upon any testimony, records and documents produced at the hearing, all of which are incorporated by this reference. R:/Resos 2003/Resos 03-124 4 Section 9. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby authorizes and directs the City Attorney's office to take all steps necessary to commence and prosecute legal proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction to acquire by eminent domain the property described on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 16t' day of September, 2003. ~A'I-I'EST: ~a~le~r Jc~es' CMC /~' [SEAL] ~ J STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA SS I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 03-124 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the city of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of September, 2003, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Stone AYES: 4 NOES: 1 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Pratt COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None Susan W. J,~r~.e.s, CMC ~.~ ~.....~ C,ty Clerk R:/Resos 2003/Resos 03-124 5 RBF CONSULTING 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 400 Temecula, CA 92591 EXHIBIT'"A" WINCHESTER ROAD Revised June 19,.2002 · May24,2002 JN 10101661.M7 Page 1 of 2 That certain parcel of land situated in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, being that portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 23430 filed In Book 168, Pages 7 through 9 of Parco! Maps in the Office Of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northwesterly comer of said Parcel 1, said comer being the northwesterly terminus of a course shown on said parcel map as "North 86°45'44" West 32.49 feet" in the northerly line of said parcel; thence along the boundary line of said parcel through the following courses: along said course South 86°55'55" East 32.4§ feet; thence South 41°59'41" East 4.22 feet to a point on a 'non-tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 25.26 feet, a radial line of said curve from sa d point bears South 19°59'52" West; thence leaving said boundary line, along said curve westerly 27.24 feet through a central angle of 61°46'35"; thence tangent from said curve South 48°13'17" West. Il.88 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 4495.40 feet; thence along ·said curve southwesterly 180.37 feet through a central angle of 02°17'56" to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 180.28 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears North 44°04'39" West; thence along said curve southwester, ly 47.16 feet through central angle of 14°59'14"'to an Intersection with a non-tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 157.29 feet, a radial line of said curve from said intersection bears South 26°09'25" East; thence along said curve southWesterly 21H9 feet through a central angle of 07°43'06"; thence non-tangent from said curve North 33°52'31'' West 3,28 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 160.57 feet; a radial line of said curve from .said p01nt beam South 33~52'31" East;' Exhibit" Winchester Road Revised June 19, 2002 IN 10101661-M7 Page 2 of 2 thence along said curve southwesterly 21.91 feet through a central,angle of 07°4g'10"; thence non-tangent from said curve South 48'18'19" West 31.06 feet to the northwesterly line of said Pamel 1; thence along said northwesterly line North 33'58'12" East 14.41 feet to an angle point In said northwesterly line; thence continuing along said northwesterly line North 48°07'50" East 297,47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, · CONTAINING: 4105 Square Feet, SUBJECT TO all Covenant's. Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record, EXHIBIT "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. This description was prepared byme~ my direction. ~l~.--a~mond L. Mathe, PiL.S. 6185, My I!cense expires 3131106. H:~DATA~ 1010166 I~,D~ ! 1~1007,wpd m 60 0 6b 180 · GRAPHIC SCALE P.M. NO. 23430 P.'M. B. DATA TABLE ~) BRNG/DELTA RADIUS LENGTH I S86'55'55"E -- 32.46'. 2 S41°59'41"E -- 4.22' 3 61'46'35" 25;26' 27.24' 4 S48'13'17"W -- 11.88' 5 14'59'14" 180,28' 47,16' 6 07'43'06" 157.29' 21.19' 7 N33'52'31"W '(R) $,28' 8 07'49'10" 160.57'' 21,91' 9 S48'18'19"W -- 31,06' 10 N33'58'12"E -- .14.41' SHEET EXHIBIT 'B, WINCHESTER ROAD ~ C]'O N 8 U LTINI3. REVISED 6/19/02 i SCALE MAY 24, 2002 I 1"=60' 168~7-9 / EXISTING SCE EASEIvlENT EXISTING EI~IWD EASEI~qT 1 OF. 1 SHEET JOB NO, 10101661-M7 · RBF CONSULTING 27555 Ynez Road, Suite 400 Temeoula, CA 92591. EXHIBIT "A" WINCHESTER ROAD TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT May 241 2002 JN 10!0166t-M19 Page 1 of 2 That certain Parcel of land situated In the City of Temecula, County of Riverside; State of .California, being that portion of Parcel 1of Parcel Map No. 23430 filed In Book 168, Pages 7 through 9 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder.of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the most northerly comer of'said Parcel 1, said comer being the northwesterly terminus of a course shown as "North 86°45'44" West 32.49 feet" in the northerly line of said Parcel; .. thence along the boundary line of said parcel South 86°56'55" East 32.48 feet; thence South 41°59'41" East 13.51 feet; through the following 'courSes: thence South 80°40'26" West 60.59 feet; thence SoUth 06°47'10'' East 14,88 feet; thence South 70°36'57" West 20.76 feet'to the beginning, of a tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 19,69 feet; thence along said curve southwesterly 12.64 feet through a central angle of 36°46'40"; thence tangent from said curve South 33°49'42'' West 89.29 feet; thence' South 29°24'53" West 85.47 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 3.28 feet; thence along said curve southwesterly and westerly 5.12 feet through a central angle of 89°22'30.; thence leaving said boundary line South 47°52'27" West 242.60 feet; Exhibit "^" Winchester Road Temporary Construction Easement May 24, 2002 .IN 10101661-1d19 Page 2 of 2 thence tangent from said curve North 61 ° 12'37" West 12160 feet; thence South 29'19'69" West 110.11 feet; thence South 81 '21'49" West 44.69 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve in the boundary · line of said Parcel 1, said curve being concave southeasterly and having a radius of 200.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point beam South 70°47'09" East; thence along said boundary line through the following courses: along said curve northeasterly 86.13 feet through a central angle of 24'40'25"; thence tangent from said curve North 43°53'16" East 181.94 feet; thence North 33°58'12" East 69.49 feet; thence North 48°07'50" East 297.47 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 16741 Square Feet. SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record. · EXHIBIT "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. This description was prepared by m~~/irectlon. .~...y?ond L; Mathe, P.L.S. 6185, '~ My I~cense expires 3131106. H:%3~DATA~I 010165 I~DIvI~Li~ALS~ ll~1019,v~pd GRAPHIC.SCALE EXISTING SCE EASEMENT EXISTING EMWD EASEMENT EXISTING RCWD EASEMENT NO, 2 $41°59'41"E 3 S47°52'27*W 4 N80'40'26"E 5 S06'47' IO'E 6 $70'36'57"W 7 36'46'40" 8 S33'49'42#W 9 S29'24'53"W 10 69°22'30" 11 N61° 12'37"W 12 S29' 19'59"W 13 S81'21'49'W 14 24'40'25' 15 N43'53' 16'£ 16 N33'58' 12'E 17 N48'O7'50*E DATA TABLE BRNG/OO. TA lUOIU9 --' 32.46' -- 13.51' -- 242.60' -- 60.59' -- 14,88' -- 20,76' 19,69' 12.64' -- 89.29' -- 85.47' 3.28' 5.12' -- 12.60' -- 110.11' -- 44.69' 200.00' 86.13' -~- 181;94' ~ 69.49' '~- 297,47' _~C/L WTNCHESTER ROAD' N48'07'50"£ (N48'OS'33'E) I I I P.O.B. I 89.78' / / NO.. 25450 ~-. PCL. 1 III KZMCO PALM PLAZA III II SHEET EXHIBIT 'B' TEMPORARY. CONSTRUCT I ON 'EASEMENT PCL. 2 67'~ Z P/t,fB 165~?-9 ~ i OF 1 'SHEET MAY 24, 2002 1"=.100' JD~ NO, 10101661-U19