HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-089 CC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 93-89
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCH, OF THE CITY OF
TEMIECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING
COMMSSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 93-0158, AMENDMENT NO. 1, AND APPROVING THE PROJECT
TO CONSTRUCT APPROXU"TELY 34,440 SQUARE FEET OF
WAREHOUSE SPACE AND 13,824 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE
IN TWO PHASES ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 10.94 ACRES LOCATED
AT 31350 RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 954-020-002.
WHEREAS, Temecula Valley Unified School District filed Planning Application No.
93-0158 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Planning Application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said
Planning Application on September 20, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity
to testify either in support or opposition to said Planning Application;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing pertaining to said
Planning Application to October 4, 1993;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said
Planning Application on October 4, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to
testify either in support or opposition to said Planning Application;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved
said Planning Application;
WHEREAS, an appeal of the Planning Commission decision was made in accordance
with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the
City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
November 9, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support
Resos 93-89 1
or opposition to said Appeal; and
"EREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY OF TEMEECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findin2s. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
1. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
general plan.2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including theissuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
C. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements
set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
I . The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general
Resos 93-89 2
plan.
2. The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
a. There is reasonable probability that Planning Application No. 93-
0158, Amendment No. 1 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
C. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c) of Ordinance No. 348, no plot plan may be approved
unless the following findings can be made:
1 . The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and
with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property.
E. The City Council, in denying the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision
to approve the proposed Planning Application, makes the following findings, to wit:
1. There is reasonable probability that Planning Application No. 93-0158,
Amendment No. 1 proposed will be consistent with the General Plan proposal being considered
or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. The draft General Plan land use
designation for the site is Public/Institutional Facilities. The draft General Plan states:
"Additional public and institutional uses may be developed in the residential or non-residential
land use designations under the procedures established in the Development Code." Until the
Development Code is adopted, Staff utilizes the provisions contained in Ordinance No. 348. As
mentioned above, Ordinance No. 348.2922 (the Ordinance adopting Specific Plan No. 199)
includes public school administrative buildings and facilities as permitted uses. The project as
proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village), Ordinance No. 348, and
the draft General Plan.
2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted General Plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan. The land use designation for the site is identified in the draft General Plan as
Resos 93-89 3
Public/Institutional Facilities. Uses which are consistent with the Public/Institutional Facilities
land use designation will ultimately be permitted on this site, and would include educational
facilities.
3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances. The proposed use complies with California
Governmental Code Section 65360, and Ordinance No. 348. The proposed project is consistent
with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village. The project is located within Planning Area
No. 28 of Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village, and is identified as a 11.0 acre school
administration site within the Specific Plan. The project as designed and conditioned meets all
the requirements of Specific Plan No. 199.
4. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The
site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot
configuration, access, and intensity of use. In addition, the project is compatible with
surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties. The project has acceptable access
to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. Access to the
project site is from a publicly maintained road (Margarita Road).
F.As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Planning Application proposed conforms
to the logicaldevelopment of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development ofthe surrounding property.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project
indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in
the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration,
therefore, is hereby granted.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. 93-0158, Amendment No. 1 to construct approximately 34,440 square
feet of warehouse space and 13,824 square feet of office space in two phases on a parcel
containing 10.94 acres located at 31350 Rancho Vista Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No.
954-020-002 subject to the following conditions:
A.Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Resos 93-89 4
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of November, 1993.
J. Sal MUi!07,,' Mayor/
ATTEST:
i e reek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Resos 93-89 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIEFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 93-89 was duly adopted by the
City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 9th day of
November 1993 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone,
Mufioz
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, City Clerk
Resos 93-89 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDMONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.- 93-0158, Amendment No. 1
Project Description: To construct approximately 34,440 square feet of warehouse
space and 13,824 square feet of office space in two phases.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 954-020-002
Approval Date: October 4. 1993
Expiration Date: October 4, 1995
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL
1The- use hereby permitted by this Plot Plan is for approximately 34,440 square feet of
warehouse space and 13,824 square feet of office space in two phases. Hours of
operation for the warehouse facility shall be between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM.
2.The permi-ttee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning Planning Application No. 93-0158, Amendment No. 1. The City of
Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails
to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to
cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
3.This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization
contemplated by this approval.
4.The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
the Site Plan marked Exhibit D, or as amended by these conditions.
5.Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit E.
6.Colors and materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit F (color material board).
7.A minimum of 193 parking spacesshall be provided in accordance with Section 18.12,
Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. Two hundred twenty-f our (224) parking spaces
shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit D.
R:%S%STAFFRPT%15SPA93.PM 1015M kb
8.A minimum of five (5) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
Exhibit D.
9.Thirteen (1 3) Class 11 bicycle racks shall be provided as shown on Exhibit D.
10.Landscaping of the site shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit-
D.
WITHIN FORTY-MGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
11.The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15094. If
within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to
the Planning Departmentthe check required above, the approval for the project granted
herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, (Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c)).
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
12.Three (3) copies of a Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plan shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate
filing fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall
be shown. Plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along streets and
within the parking areas.
13.Prior to the issuance of building permits for Phase 2 (warehouse expansion and office
expansion), the applicant shall file an application for approval by the Planning Director
for the elevations for Phase 2. Accompanying the application shall be three (3) sets
of elevations and the appropriate filing fee.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS
14.Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view.
1 5.All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans.
16.All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a
condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free
of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be property constructed and
in good working order.
17.Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
R-.\S%STA 15SPA93.P= lOf5M kl 1 2
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22
inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
'Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at
least 3 square feet in size.
18.A FRabRtenaRee bend, tB @U8FBntee the installatien ef pl8Rt'-Rgr, aRd adequate
Fna*FiteRaRee -ef the PleFiving #eF efte yeaf, ShBil he filed with the DepeFtFReRt of
PlaFiR*Rg. Said bend afneunt shall be subFRot4ed te the DiFeetBF Bt P18HRiRg f8F Fe '
aRd 8PPFewe' PF08F te the subFnit4al ef the be@. The applicant shall provide to the
Director of Planning a landscape maintenance agreement to insure the maintenance of
the plantings for a period of one year. Said landscape maintenance agreement shall
be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. (Amended at the Planning
Commission meeting on October 4, 1993).
19.All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
20.The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the
Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula
Code.
21.Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan in compliance with
Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
22.Prior to the commencement of any construction work, obtain all building plan and
permit approvals.
23.Provide occupancy approval for all existing buildings (i.e. finialed building permit,
Certificate of Occupancy).
24.All existing buildings and facilities must comply with applicable handicapped
accessibility regulations.
25.Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior
lighting, fire alarm systems.
26.Restroom fixtures, number and type, shall be in accordance with the provisions of the
1991 edition of the uniform plumbing code, Appendix C.
R:NSXNA ISSPA93.P= 1015193 kh 1 3
27.The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original
signature on plans submitted for plan review.
28.The applicant shall provide electrical plan including load caics and panel schedule,
plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
29.The Applicant shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the ' State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
30.A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. If the
full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
31.The Applicant shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established
per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact, if applicable. (Amended at the Planning
Commission meeting on October 4, 1993).
32.The Applicant shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in eff act at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which the Applicant requests its building permits for the project or any phase
thereof, the Applicant shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee,
a copy of which has been provided to the Applicant. Concurrently, with executing this
Agreement, the Applicant shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility
fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square toot, not to exceed $1 0,000.
The Applicant understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in
excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such
fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Applicant will waive any right to protest
the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact
fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact
fee for this project; E)rovided that the Applicant is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof, if applicable.
(Amended at the Planning Commission meeting on October 4, 1993.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF AN ENCROACHMENT PERMITS
33.An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within the existing City right-of-way-
R:@WA ISSPA93.PC2 10/5/93 kb 1 4
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS
34.The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and
replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
35.Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
OTHER AGENCIES
36.Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the
provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated
August 6, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
37.Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of
Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated August 9, 1993,
a copy of which is attached.
38.The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho
California Water District's transmittal dated August 11, 1993, a copy of which is
attached.
R:@WA 15$PA93.PM 1015M Ub 1 5
,LI-L L)/ U I V Cl ILLC R rr_- C E I.V E D
.DEpART,ME:,XT OF Ei.@ONLMEiN-rAL T-H
AUG 1 2 I'aal
Ans'd
DATE:Aux= 6,1993
TO: C= OF @JECULA PL G DEPT-
A=, : ANiarthew Fagan
FROM: mnental Health Specialist IV
RE:PLOT PLAIN NO. PA9.-)-0158
Dtmct F=Iity =d bas the fOUOwmg cc
I .ita . @ this @ty may be cm a
require&
-Me =t OfEn enul H@th bw revi@ the an of the T==Wa VaUev UgMed School
smqe disponi If @ is the the followmg is
2. The sewage disposal sysu= == be c=@ bv a C-42 State Lir=sed Plt=bcr. M= s=
and condition of the cci-ttivig must be certiried by the above as per of Envimnrm=-l
r to vcnfv the s= of the svstg= by obr-inimst a cm
tL lu addiucn, it may be y of the
buildiag @t =d sim2ed job card fr= the Ri County md Safety Dcpar==L
the c.@ subsurfa= c
A scaled (I'=40' plot pL= showing all fL
d sv== The compicte ge@ including IOO'YO exoa=oa must be plocled
on the Plot I)IM
4.Detailed soils testing =y be @ed if the above cmwt be eff@ or.
ùthe -= is wi@ a high wa= table --= or an nrca wi2cre soils bave poor l@ cs.
b the have failed or is fa;iing
c the subsurfa= am of s= or I in = ==ccptable -m
arc not to be in a veiu@ -r- - paved or =pavc4
5.A Reserve" len- &= the ag=cy @ding vA=.
OR
6. Should s=wy sma be a@le, a lc= ftom @ appropriate di=ict @ be
req@
7 PRrOR'TOBLrILDINGPEBMITLYSUANCZ fr= M of us
Services M=agcm=L Br--h (909) 358-MS5.
Sb&-dr
(909)275-9980
RIV-ERSI]DE @OUNTY
FIRE DEPARTI NT
UV 7, y
,OF --.@
RSI 210 N@, SAN JACINTO -'kVEL@ o PE.R-RM CALIFORNL-,. 9"@-,o
I. Ni. @-IUS
August 9, 1993
TO:Temecula Planning Department
,,TTEN:Matthew Fagan
RE:PA.93-0158
Withrespect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced
recommends the --2ollowina f 4--@e
mlor- -olan, the Fire Demarzl-uenr-
ty of TL mecula
ance with C6
'Drotecti-an measures be provided in accord
ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
i. The Fire Devartment is required to set a minimum fire flow
for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings
using the procedure established in Ordinance 546.
2. Provide or show there exists a water system capable of
delivering 2000 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 2OPSI residual
operating pressure, which must be available before any
Co=ustible material is placed on the job site.
3. A combination of on-site and of,'.-site super fire hydrants,
an a looped system (6ux4llx2-2 1/2-), Will be located not less
than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the
building as measured along ap proved vehicular travelways.
The re@red fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system.
4. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets
and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They
shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line
with fire hydrants
5 - The required f -Lre flow may be adjusted at a later point in
the De=it process to reflect @ges in design, construction
type area separation or built-in fire protection.
ner shall furnish one cadv of water
6. Aunlicant/devela-
system -olans to the F,4.r-3 DeDartment for review. Plans shall
=-to the fire hvdramt tvme, location and sioac-4-ng, and
confa
the system shall meet the @.ire flow requirements. Plans shall-
be sigmed/acDroved by a re,7iste=-ed civil ena4-neer and the
lo'cal water--cO=-anY- with t:ne following certification: "T
certify that the desian of the water system is in accordance
.with the requirements prescribed by the Rive--side County Fire
Dena@-tment".
7.install a co=lete fire sprinkler system in all
buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department
connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a
hydrant, and a minim= of 25 feet from the building (s) . A
statement that the buildings will be automatically fire
sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building
plans.
S. A statement that the building will be automatically fire
snrinklered must appear an the title page of the building
plans.
9. Prior to final inspection of any building , the applicant
snall pre-Dare and subnlt to the Fire Department for approval,
a site plan designation required fire lanes with appropriate
lane paint.
0. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating
of 2AIOBC. Contact a certified extinguisher co=any for
proper Solacement of eauirment.
ii. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
anmlicant/develover- shall be responsible to submit a check or
money order in the amount of $558.00 to the City of Temecula
for plan check fees. Please reference Plan Check number with
remittance.
12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the develcoer
shall denosit, with the City of Temecula, a check or money
order equaling the sum of $.25 per square foot as mitigation
for fire Protection inmaczs. This amount must be submitted
separately from the plan check fees.
13. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans
are reviewed in the building and safety office.
A.ii guests ons
t).ie meaning of conditions shall be
PIA-ni-ng and -Zng;-nee=--4-ng Sta-@@--
P.AYMOND R. P.EGIS
Chief Fire Depar=ent Plannpr
by
L@ Cab@l
Fire Safety Specialist
R E C E I V E D
Rancho AUG 1 3 19-2-3
Aug= 11, 199'3
B"rd of Dimmrz: iMr. Matthew Fagan
Doug Ful@ City of Temecula
@ng Pl:;nni-ncy Department
4-Dl74 Business Park Drive
Wph IL Dady Temec@ CA 92590--3606
Sau@ IL Hughes
CT:Water Availa7oility
Lima F. Ko OU.DJE
Lisa D. Pater"n APN 954-020-002
Ri@ D. Sgettey (PA93-0153)
omcwrz: Dear Mr. Faam:
F. Rohmgar
Please be advised that the above-referenced properrv is located %vithin the
PhiUiv L- Fortma
Dirwmre(F@s- boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RC@). Water se@ce,
therefore, would be available uvan completion of financial arrangements
F-P.'Uob'Lemons
between R@ and the propertv owner.
Kennota C. Dealy
@@r.iO*em@Water avaflabilirvwould be contingent upon the properrv owner sig=' a an
@aencv Agreement which assi water management rights, if anv to R@.
Pvrry R. Louck gns
C-ti-i.,
@da 3L F@g@ If you have any questions, please contact iMs. Senga Doherty.
Ow@ @"M
jonm"s. Eaws@
& H.@k"n Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFO@NIAWATF.R DISTRIC7
teve Brannon, P.E.
Development F-nginee@g Manager
SB:S[k:ebl29-?./Fl86
cc:Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
Calif*mL& Waupr Diames
ZMI Di" Pmgtwsft got-, Toon@ C.Li&mL2
F.4.' .120#fr.4"13
astern i vilunicipat V'Y
JAI CO"Idi C-S.; A. WC3,c-
iLca-.nC 3nd Sh"riii v
D,"cjo, Si 7," Igdrm"@ W.", @ter D. Sirmi
0,Is@ Si so"n"w @iom-
V
Do.ic E. Boen 6.
.4arv r- Whett
FLolefs .14. Coz August 17, 1993 AUG 20
Mat-.haw Fagan, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Der)artment
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT:Temecula Valley Unified School District Plot Plan
(PA 93-0158)
Dear Mr. Fagan:
We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your off ice which
describe the subject oroject. our comments are outlined below:
General
is our understanding the subject project is a proposed expansion
of the existing Temecula Valley -Unified School District @acility
located an the north side of Rancho Vista Rd., between Avenida De
La Reina and Via El Greco, (Assessor Parcel No. 954-020-002).
The subject project is located within the Dis,."-rict's sanitary sewer
service area. However, it must be understood the available
capabilities of the Distric-6"-Is systems are continually changing due
to the occurrence of development within the District and programs
of systems improvement. As such, the provision of ser-iice will be
based an the detailed plan of service requirements, the timing of
the subject 'roject, the status of the Dis%@.--ict's permit to
p
onerate, and the se--vice agreement between the District and the
developer of the subject project.
Sanitar7 Sewer
The subject project is considered tributary to the District's
Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility.
Cther Issues
The subjec- project representative must contact the Dist--ict's
Customer Se--vice Department in-order to arrange for the following
actions:
,'Aali -io: Posr Office Box 8300 - San Jacinco. Califomia 92581-8300 - Tclechone (909) 925-7676 - F2x (909) 929-0257
Niain Offi=: 20-45 S. San jacinco Aym@ San jacinco - Cusmmcr @im/En
g
440 E.
d Avenue. H
CA
Mat--.Iiew Fagan
PA 93-0158
AUgus= 17, 1993
Page 2
plan check of-onsite plumbing
field inspection of ansite plumbing
revision to existing service account to reflect e=-anded-
facility
Should you have any question-- regarding these comments, please feel
free to contact this office at (909) 925-7676, extension 468.
very truly yours,
EASTERN H=CIPAL WATEP. D3:STRICT
David G. C ey
Senior Engineer
Customer Service Department
DGC/cz
AB 93-863
(wp-nrwk-PA930 I 5 S.:Iz)