HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-78 CC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 2020-78
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUBSEQUENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND
ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 13) (PA18-0660)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine and declare that:
A. On May 7, 2018, Harveston-SAB LLC, a California Limited Liability Company,
filed Planning Application Nos. PA 18-0659, for a General Plan Amendment, and PA 18-0660, for
a Specific Plan Amendment. These applications (collectively, "Project") were filed in a manner
in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law,including the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code
Regs. § 15000 et seq.).
C. Pursuant to CEQA,the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public
agency with the authority and principal responsibility for reviewing, considering, and potentially
approving the Project.
D. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including CEQA.
E. The Harveston Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 13) was approved by the City
Council on August 14, 2001 by the adoption of Resolution No. 01-72. Amendment No. 1 to the
Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved by the City Council on August 26, 2003, by the
adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program
Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan(SCH#99041033).
F. CEQA encourages"tiering" EIRs for a sequence of actions so that later EIRs build
on information in previous EIRs (Public Resources Code sections 21068.5 and 21093; CEQA
Guidelines section 15152(d)). The Project is located within the Harveston Specific Plan area and,
therefore, tiers off of the Program EIR for the Harveston Specific Plan.
G. Pursuant to CEQA, City staff determined that the Project could have a significant
effect on the environment and therefore a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(SEIR)should
be prepared for the Project.
H. On July 24, 2019, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15082, the City
published and distributed a Notice of Preparation(NOP)to all agencies and persons that might be
affected by the Project. The NOP was also distributed through the State Office of Planning and
Research, State Clearinghouse(SCH#2019070974). The NOP was circulated from July 24, 2019
through August 22, 2019 to receive comments and input from interested public agencies and
private parties on issue to be addressed in the SEIR.
I. On August 8, 2019, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15082(c)(1),the
City held a public scoping meeting to obtain comments from interested parties on the scope of the
Draft SEIR.
J. In response to the NOP, four (4) written comments were received from various
individuals and organizations. These comment letters assisted the City in formulating the analysis
in the Draft SEIR.
K. Thereafter, the City contracted for the independent preparation of a Draft SEIR for
the Project, including all necessary technical studies and reports in support of the Draft SEIR. In
accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City analyzed the Project's potential
impacts on the environment,potential mitigation, and potential alternatives to the Project.
L. Upon completion of the Draft SEIR in January 2020, the City initiated a public
comment period by filing a Notice of Completion with the State Office of Planning and Research
on January 31, 2020. The City also published a Notice of Availability for the Draft SEIR in San
Diego Union Tribune,a newspaper of general circulation within the City. A Notice of Availability
was also posted on the project site.
M. The Draft SEIR was circulated for public review from January 31, 2020 through
March 16, 2020. Copies of the Draft SEIR were sent to various public agencies, as well as to
organizations and individuals requesting copies. In addition, copies of the documents have been
available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Community Development
Department, located at City Hall,41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; the Ronald H.
Roberts Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road; Temecula Grace Mellman
Community Library located at 41000 County Center Drive;the Temecula Chamber of Commerce
located at 26790 Ynez Court, Suite A; and the City of Temecula website, where the documents
have been available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
N. In response to the Draft SEIR, the City received seven (7) written comments from
various agencies, individuals, and organizations. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines section
15088, the City prepared written responses to all comments. None of the comments presented any
new significant environmental impacts or otherwise constituted significant new information
requiring recirculation of the Draft SEIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5. Those
comments and the Response to Comments, together with the Draft SEIR, the Corrections and
2
Additions to the Draft SEIR,and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program,constitute the
Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report(Final SEIR).
O. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21092.5, at least 10 prior s to
certification,the City provided the Final SEIR,including responses to comments,to the public and
all commenting public agencies.
P. On November 9,2020,the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing
to consider the Final SEIR and the Project, at which time heard and considered information
presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition,interested persons
had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter..
Q. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public
hearing and due consideration of the Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
2020-36 recommending that the City Council certify the Final SEIR prepared for Amendment No.
2 to the Harveston Specific Plan, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the
Project. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 2020-37 and Resolution No.
2020-38,thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions, including adoption of
a Specific Plan Amendment and General Plan Amendment related to the approval of the Project.
R. Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that the City, before
approving a project for which an EIR is required, make one or more of the following written
finding(s) for each significant effect identified in the Final SEIR accompanied by a brief
explanation of the rationale for each finding:
1. Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in
the Final SEIR; or,
2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been
adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency;
or,
3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including
provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers,make infeasible
the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final SEIR.
S. These required written findings are set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.
1. Environmental impacts, or certain aspects of impacts, identified in the Final SEIR
as potentially significant,but that can be reduced to less than significant levels with
mitigation, are described in Exhibit A, Section IV.
3
2. The one environmental impact identified in the Final SEIR as significant and
E unavoidable despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures is described
in Exhibit A, Section V.
3. Alternatives to the Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental
impacts are described in Section VI of Exhibit A.
T. CEQA section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program for any project for which mitigation measures have been
imposed to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B, and is herein incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full.
U. CEQA Guidelines section 15093 requires that if a project will cause significant
unavoidable adverse impacts, the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior
to approving the project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations states that any significant
adverse project effects are acceptable if expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse
environmental impacts. The Statement of Overriding Considerations is part of the findings, and is
attached hereto as Exhibit A, and is incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.
V. Prior to taking action, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed,
and considered the information and data in the administrative record, including the Final SEIR,
the written and oral comments on the Draft SEIR and Final SEIR, responses to comments, staff
reports and presentations, technical studies, appendices, and all oral and written testimony
presented prior to and during the public hearings on the Project.
W. Custodian of Records. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is the custodian of
records, and the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon
which this decision is based are located at the Office of the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 41000
Main Street, Temecula, California 92590.
Section 2. Substantive Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula,California
does hereby:
A. Declare that the above Procedural Findings are true and correct, and hereby
incorporates them herein by this reference as though set forth in full.
B. Find that agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample
notice and opportunity to comment on the Final SEIR and on the Project.
C. Find and declare that the City Council has independently considered the
administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the
Final SEIR,the written and oral comments on the Draft SEIR,responses to comments incorporated
into the Final SEIR, staff reports and presentations, and all testimony related to environmental
issues regarding the Project.
4
D. Find and determine that the Final SEIR fully analyzes and discloses the potential
impacts of the Project,and that those impacts have been mitigated or avoided to the extent feasible
for the reasons set forth in the Findings attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference,
with the exception of those impacts found to be significant and unmitigable as discussed therein.
E. Find and declare that the Final SEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City
Council. The City Council further finds that the additional information provided in the staff
reports, in comments on the Draft SEIR, the responses to comments on the Draft SEIR, and the
evidence presented in written and oral testimony, does not constitute new information requiring
recirculation of the SEIR under CEQA. None of the information presented has deprived the public
of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial environmental impact of the Project
or a feasible mitigation measure or alternative that the City has declined to implement.
F. Certify the Final SEIR as being in compliance with CEQA. The City Council
further adopts the Findings pursuant to CEQA as set forth in Exhibit A; adopts the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program attached as Exhibit B; and adopts the Statement of Overriding
Considerations as set forth in Exhibit A.The City Council further determines that all of the findings
made in this Resolution (including Exhibit A) are based upon the information and evidence set
forth in the Final SEIR and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearings
before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and in the record of the proceedings. The
City Council further finds that each of the overriding benefits stated in Exhibit A,by itself, would
individually justify proceeding with the Project despite any significant unavoidable impacts
identified in the Final SEIR or alleged in the record of proceedings.
G. The City Council hereby imposes as a condition on the Amendment No. 2 to the
Harveston Specific Plan each mitigation measure specified in Exhibit B, and directs City staff to
implement and to monitor the mitigation measures as described in Exhibit B.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this Pt day of December, 2020.
M ann wards, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTES •
Rands Jo City Clerk
[SEAL]
s
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020-78 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 1 y` day of December, 2020 by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank
NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Randi Johl, City Clerk
6
Final
HARVESTON GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - PLANNING AREA 12
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and
Statement of Overriding Considerations
State Clearinghouse No, 2019070974
Prepared for October 2020
City of Temecula
P ESA
C
C
C
Final
HARVESTON GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - PLANNING AREA 12
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and
Statement of Overriding Considerations
State Clearinghouse No. 2019070974
Prepared for October 2020
City of Temecula
2121 0n Parkway r ESA
Suite 100
Irvine,CA 92606
949.753.7001
esassoc.com
Bend Orlando San Jose
Camarillo Pasadena Santa Monica
Delray Beach Petaluma Sarasota
Destin Portland Seattle
Irvine Sacramento Tampa
Los Angeles San Diego
Oakland San
Francisco
D'8'343
OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY I ESA helps a variety of
public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and
emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions.ESA is a registered
assessor with the California Climate Action Registry,a Climate Leader,
and founding reporter for the Climate Registry.ESA is also a corporate
member of the U.S.Green Building Council and the Business Council on
Climate Change(BC3).Internally,ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision
and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our
operations.This document was produced using recycled paper.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and
Statement of Overriding Considerations for
Harveston General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan Amendment — Planning Area 12
Page
I. Introduction 1
II. Project Description 1
III. Previous Environmental Review 2
IV. Potentially Significant Environmental Impacts Determined to be Mitigated
to a Less Than Significant Level 4
V. Potentially Significant Environmental Impacts Determined to be
Significant and Unavoidable 25
VI. Project Alternatives 26
VII. Statement of Overriding Considerations 31
Harveston GPAISPA—Planning Area 12 I ESA /D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Ovemding Considerations
•
Table of Contents
This page intentionally left blank
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 II ESA/D181343
Findings and Fads in Support of Findings and Statement of April 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings
and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Harveston General Plan Amendment and
Specific Plan Amendment — Planning Area 12
I. Introduction
The California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §21000,et seq.("CEQA")
and the State CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000,et seq. (the"Guidelines")
provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental
impact report has been certified that identifies one or more significant effects on the
environment caused by the project unless the public agency makes one or more of the following
findings:
A. Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the project, which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the Environmental
Impact Report(EIR).
B. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency and not the
agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can
and should be adopted by such other agency.
C. Specific economic,social,or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or
project alternatives identified in the EIR.'
Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA,the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes
the following environmental findings in connection with the proposed Harveston General Plan
Amendment(GPA)and Specific Plan Amendment(SPA)—Planning Area 12 Project(Project),as
more fully described in the Final Subsequent EIR(SEIR). These findings are based upon written
and oral evidence included in the record of these proceedings,comments on the Draft SEIR and
the written responses thereto,and reports presented to the Planning Commission and City Council
by City staff and the City's environmental consultants.
II. Project Description
The Project is located within the Harveston Specific Plan that was approved in 2001.This
Specific Plan covers approximately 550 acres and is located between Margarita Road and
Interstate 15,along the Temecula City limits, in the northwest section of the City.The Specific
1 Cal.Pub.Res.Code§21081; 14 Cal.Code Regs. § 15091.
Harveston GPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 1 ESA I D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Plan depicts a land use designation of Service Commercial for the Project Site.The Project would
include a GPA that would change the existing General Plan land use designation from Service
Commercial(SC)to Specific Plan Implementation(SPI)and a SPA that would include a
residential overlay to the Specific Plan on an 87.54-acre portion of Planning Area 12.The
residential overlay would allow the future development of a maximum of 1,000 residential units.
As set forth in the SEIR,objectives that the City of Temecula and applicant seek to achieve with
this Project(the"Project Objectives")are as follows:
The Project objectives include:
• Create a development compatible with and sensitive to the existing land uses in the Project
area.
• Provide high-quality residential development that would help to fulfill the City's regional
housing needs.
• Promote the development of residential land uses that convey a high quality visual image and
character.
• Provide high-quality residential architecture that will he required/needed within the proposed
residential overlay.
III. Previous Environmental Review
The Harveston Specific Plan Draft EIR(State Clearinghouse No. 99041033),dated November
2000,and the Harveston Specific Plan Final EIR and Response to Comments(State
Clearinghouse No.99041033),dated February 2001,were certified on August 14,2001.City staff
has determined that the Project would result in new significant environmental impacts that were
not previously addressed in the certified Harveston Specific Plan EIR,and therefore a Subsequent
EIR, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162,is the appropriate document to
respond to the Project-specific changes.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15150(a)states that an EIR:
may incorporate by reference all or portions of another document which is a
matter of public record or is generally available to the public. Where all or part
of another document is incorporated by reference, the incorporated language
shall be considered to be set forth in full as part of the text of the EIR.
In light of the previous environmental review contained in the Harveston Specific Plan EIR
(2001),the Draft SEIR incorporated by reference the relevant analysis of environmental topics
considered in the previously certified Harveston Specific Plan EIR.
On July 24,2019, in accordance with CEQA Guideline Section 15082,the City published a
Notice of Preparation(NOP)of a Draft SEIR that included an Initial Study and circulated it to
governmental agencies,organizations,and persons that may be interested in the Project,including
land owners,tenants,and business owners in proximity to the site.The NOP requested comments
Harveston GPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 2 ESA/D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overnding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
on the scope of the Draft SEIR,and asked that those agencies with regulatory authority over any
aspect of the Project to describe that authority.The comment period extended through August 22,
2019. Responses to the NOP were received from the following agencies: (1)the Native American
Heritage Commission,Cultural and Environmental Department,(2)the Riverside Transit Agency
and(3)the South Coast Air Quality Management District.No project-specific concerns were
raised by these agencies. In addition to the pubic noticing required under CEQA,City staff held
an informational meeting on August 8,2019 at the Harveston Lake House located at 29005
Lakehouse Road,Temecula,CA 92591.At the public scoping meeting,a brief presentation and
overview of the Project was provided.After the presentation,oral and written comments on the
scope of the environmental issues to be addressed in the Draft SEIR were accepted.The
following list provides the key issues raised during the NOP comment period(refer to Appendix
A of the Draft SEIR):
• Recommended consultation with California Native Tribes(refer to Section 3.3,Cultural
Resources,and Section 3.12,Tribal Cultural Resources,of the Draft SEIR);
• Construction impacts with bus stop/relocation of bus stop temporarily(refer to Chapter 2.0,
Project Description and Section 3.11,Transportation,of the Draft SEIR);
• Recommendations provided by SCAQMD regarding the analysis of air quality(refer to
Section 3.1, Air Quality,and Section 3.5,Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change,of
the Draft SEIR);
• Concerns with aesthetics;
• Concerns with air quality(refer to Section 3.1,Air Quality, and Section 3.5,Greenhouse Gas
Emissions and Climate Change,of the Draft SEIR);
• Concerns with hazards and hazardous materials;
• Concerns with traffic on Ynez Road(refer to Section 3.11,Transportation,of the Draft
SEIR);
• Concerns with school capacities(refer to Section 3.9, Public Services,of the Draft SEIR);
• Concerns with traffic generated by the Project(refer to Section 3.11,Transportation,of the
Draft SEIR);
• Concerns with traffic and how the overpass to I-15 is the key to traffic(refer to Section 3.11,
Transportation,of the Draft SEIR);
• Concerns with safe path to travel to schools(refer to Section 3.9, Public Services,of the Draft
SEIR);
• Concerns with parks(refer to Section 3.9, Public Services,and Section 3.10,Recreation,of
the Draft SEIR);
• Concerns with crime(refer to Section 3.9, Public Services,of the Draft SEIR);
• Concerns with health issues for homes near the freeway(refer to Section 3.1,Air Quality,and
Section 3.5,Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change,of the Draft SEIR).
Harveston GPAJSPA—Planning Area 12 3 ESA I D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
The level of specificity of an EIR is determined by the nature of the project and the rule of reason.
Based on the environmental evaluations provided in the IS/NOP and the Draft SEIR,the
environmental issues that were found to have no impact related to Project implementation
included: aesthetics,agriculture and forestry,geology and soils,hazards and hazardous materials,
hydrology and water quality, mineral resources,and wildfire. The environmental issues where
impacts were found to be less than significant included: energy,greenhouse gas emissions and
climate change,land use and planning,population and housing,public services,recreation,and
utilities and service systems. Through the preparation of an Initial Study and issuance of a Notice
of Preparation,the City,as lead agency,has determined the key environmental issues that could
have significant impacts prior to the implementation of mitigation,and which are the focus of this
SEIR analysis,are: (A)air quality,(B)biological resources,(C)cultural resources,(D)noise,(E)
transportation, and(F)tribal cultural resources. As discussed further below,air quality impacts
remain significant and unavoidable following the imposition of all feasible mitigation.
IV. Potentially Significant Environmental Impacts
Determined to be Mitigated to a Less Than
Significant Level
The Draft SEIR identified the potential for the Project to cause significant environmental impacts
in specific areas of: air quality;biological resources;cultural resources;noise;transportation;and
tribal cultural resources. Measures have been identified that would mitigate all of the impacts in
this section to a less than significant level.
The City Council finds that the feasible mitigation measures for the Project identified in the Final
Subsequent EIR would reduce the Project's impacts to a less than significant.
A. Air Quality
1. Violation of Air Quality Standards(Project and Cumulative Construction)
Construction activities associated with implementation of the Project could violate air
quality standards related to NOx emissions and would result in significant air quality
impacts.As described below,these impacts can be mitigated to less than significant
levels.
The Project would involve the construction of approximately 1,000 residences on 87.5
acres.Construction activities associated with the Project would generate NOx emissions
from the following construction activities:(1)grading,and excavation;(2)construction
workers traveling to and from Project Site;(3)delivery and hauling of construction
supplies to,and debris from,the Project Site;(4)fuel combustion by on-site construction
equipment;(5)building construction.The amount of NOx emissions generated on a daily
basis could vary as a function of vehicle trips per day associated with debris hauling,
delivery of construction materials,vendor trips,worker commute trips,and the types and
number of heavy-duty,off-road equipment used and the intensity and frequency of their
operation.
Harveston GPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 4 ESA/0181343
Findings and Fads in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
The modeled peak daily NOx emissions associated with the Project's worst-case
construction air emission scenario is provided in Table 3.1-7 of the Draft SEIR that
shows the maximum NOx emissions could be 141 lbs/day.These potential maximum
NOx emissions would exceed the SCAQMD regional significance threshold of 100
lbs/day,and therefore,represent a significant air quality impact. As described below,the
impact from the generation of NOx emissions can be reduced to less than significant.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant project and cumulative regional
construction NOx emissions identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measure would reduce the project and cumulative regional
construction NOx emissions to less than significant.
Mitigation Measure AQ-1: During Project construction,all internal combustion
engines/construction equipment(including tug boats but excluding crew and bio-
survey boats)exceeding 50 horse power and operating on the Project Site shall meet
Tier 4 CARB/U.S. EPA emission standards. If not already supplied with a factory
equipped diesel particulate filter,all off-road diesel-powered construction equipment
shall be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARB.Any emissions control
device used by the contractor shall achieve emission reductions that are no less than
what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly
sized engine as defined by CARB regulations. In addition,construction equipment
shall incorporate,where feasible,emissions savings technology such as hybrid drives
and specific fuel economy standards. In the event that all off-road diesel-powered
construction equipment cannot meet the Tier 4 engine certification,each project
applicant shall use alternative measures,which include,but would not be limited to,
reduction in the number and/or horsepower rating of construction equipment, limiting
the number of daily construction haul truck trips to and from the Project,using
cleaner vehicle fuel,and/or limiting the number of individual construction project
phases occurring simultaneously.The effectiveness of alternative measures must be
demonstrated through a future air emissions study with written findings supported by
substantial evidence that is approved by the lead agency before use.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The SEIR analysis of the Project determined that under an estimated worst-case
construction scenario,implementation of the Project would result in significant air
quality impacts associated with NOx emissions. Implementation of Mitigation
Measure AQ-1 would reduce the emissions of NOx. EPA Tier 4 standards require a
significant reduction in NOx emissions associated with the internal combustion
engines of construction equipment.As shown in Table 3.1-9 in Section 3.1,Air
Quality,of the Draft SEIR,the modeled mitigated peak daily NOx emissions
associated with the Project's worst-case construction scenario would be reduced to a
maximum of 37 lbs/day which would not exceed the SCAQMD regional significance
Harveston GPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 5 ESA /D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
threshold for NOx of 100 lbs/day.Therefore,construction NOx emissions would be
reduced to less than significant.
2. Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Pollutant Concentrations(Project and Cumulative
Localized Operational Emissions)
The daily on-site operational emissions generated by the Project were evaluated against
SCAQMD's LSTs for a five-acre site at a distance of 82 feet to determine whether the
emissions would cause or contribute to adverse localized air quality impacts.The nearest
offsite sensitive receptors are the single-family residential dwelling units located across
Ynez Road,approximately 100 feet from the Project Site.
The Project's total operational-related emissions generated onsite are 2.14 lbs/day for
PM2.5 which exceeds the SCAQMD's screening operational LST of 2.0 for PM2.5.
Therefore, localized PM2.5 emissions from operational activities would be potentially
significant.
As described below,the impacts from the generation of operational PM2.5 emissions can
be reduced to less than significant.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant project and cumulative localized
operational PM2.5 emissions to less than significant as identified in the Final SEIR.
Mitigation Measure AQ-2:The following measures will be implemented to reduce
operational emissions of ROG and NOX.These measures are not all inclusive and
additional measures can be substituted or added to further reduce emissions.
• No residential units shall be constructed with fireplaces/hearths. If this measure is
substituted,total emissions reductions from the added mitigation shall meet or
exceed the emissions reductions from the removal of fireplaces from the Project
(i.e.,a reduction in emissions equal to or greater than the reduction in emissions
between Table 3.1 8 and Table 3.1 10).
• Residents of single-family units shall be provided information documenting the
benefits of using low VOC paints and cleaning supplies.
• A Traffic Demand Management(TDM)program shall be developed to encourage
the use of non-single occupant vehicles,including information on ride share,
carpool,vanpool,bus,train and trolley opportunities within the City and the
region.
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 6 ESA /D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overndmg Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
• All residential parking spaces provided shall be designed to,at a minimum,
achieve CALGreen Tier 1 standards for electric vehicle supply equipment of the
most current Title 24 iteration at the time of building construction.2.
• Implementing projects proposed within the SPA shall quantify NOX and ROG
emissions from the implementing project operational activities and shall
demonstrate achievement of the emissions performance standard of less than 55
pounds per day of ROG and less than 55 pounds per day of NOX. If the
performance standard cannot be achieved, implementing projects shall
incorporate all feasible project-level mitigation such that emissions of ROG and
NOX are reduced to the furthest extent possible.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The SEIR analysis of the Project determined that with the implementation of
Mitigation Measure AQ-2,specifically banning fireplaces within the residential
development,the Project's PM2.5 localized operational emissions would reduce from
2.14 lbs/day of PM2.5(refer to Table 3.1-12,of the Draft SEIR)to 1.0 lbs/day of
PM2.5(refer to Table 3.1-14,of the Draft SEIR)which would not exceed the
SCAQMD's significance threshold of 2.0 lbs/day.Therefore,the PM2.5 localized
operational emissions would be reduced to less than significant.
3. Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Pollutant Concentrations(Project and Cumulative
Construction TAC Emissions)
Project construction would result in short-term emissions of diesel PM,which is a toxic
air contaminant(TAC). Diesel PM poses a carcinogenic health risk that is measured
using an exposure period of 70 years.The exhaust of off-road heavy-duty diesel
equipment would emit diesel PM during site grading;paving; installation of utilities,
materials transport and handling;building construction;and other miscellaneous
activities.
The dose to which receptors are exposed is the primary factor used to determine health
risk(i.e.,the potential exposure to TACs to be compared to applicable standards). Dose is
a function of the concentration of a substance or substances in the environment and the
duration of exposure to the substance. Dose is positively correlated with time,meaning
that a longer exposure period would result in a higher exposure level for the maximally
exposed individual.Thus,the risks estimated for a maximally exposed individual are
higher if a fixed exposure occurs over a longer period of time.According to OEHHA,
carcinogenic health risk assessments,which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors
to TAC emissions,should be based on a 70-year exposure period;however,such
assessments should be limited to the period or duration of activities associated with the
Project.
2 The 2019 CALGreen standards require all single and two-family dwellings and townhouses with private attached
garages to include a dedicated 208/240-volt branch circuit to be installed and for multi-family dwellings 15 percent
of the total parking spaces(but no less than 1)shall provide capabilities for electrical vehicle charging.
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 7 ESA /0181343
Findings and Fads in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Risk was calculated for the offsite and onsite residential receptors within 1,000 feet of the
Project Site.There are no school receptors within this 1,000-foot radius.AERMOD was
used to quantify concentrations at the offsite receptors. Health risk calculations were
performed using a spreadsheet tool consistent with the OEHHA guidance.Detailed risk
assessment is included as Appendix B,of the Draft SEIR.
With Project construction activities,the maximum incremental increase in cancer risk is
projected to be up to approximately 36-in-one million for construction risk for offsite
residential receptors and 69-in-one million for onsite receptors. Risk for residential
receptors would exceed the SCAQMD significance threshold of 10-in-one million,and
therefore,impacts would be potentially significant.The maximum exposed offsite
residential receptor is located directly across Ynez Rd west of Date Street.The maximum
exposed onsite receptor would change depending on the location that is developed first.
However, under a worst-case condition,the maximum exposed onsite receptor would be
located close to and west of Date Street.
As described below,the maximum cancer risk during construction activities would be
reduced to less than significant.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into the Project,which
avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant maximum cancer risk during
construction activities.
Mitigation: Implement Mitigation Measure AQ-1 and the following Mitigation
Measure:
Mitigation Measure AQ-3: During construction activities,the construction
supervisor will ensure that any welders used onsite will be electric.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The SEIR analysis of the Project determined that implementation of Mitigation
Measures AQ-1 and AQ-3 would reduce maximum cancer risk for onsite residential
receptors from 69 in one million prior to mitigation(refer to Table 3.1-13,of the
Draft SEIR)to 2 in one million after mitigation(refer to Table 3.1-15,of the Draft
SEIR).The reduction of the maximum cancer risk to 2 in one million would be less
than SCAQMD's significance threshold of 10 in one million.Therefore,cancer risk
impacts to onsite residential receptors would be reduced to less than significant.
B. Biological Resources(Project and Cumulative)
1. Special Status Species,Sensitive Species,or Candidate Species(project and cumulative)
The project would result in grading activities to the 87.5-acre Project Site. Project
construction activities would result in the removal of non-native grassland habitat,
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 8 ESA/D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
disturbed habitat,and urban/developed areas.The Project Site contains suitable nesting
habitat for raptors and birds,including the California horned lark,protected under the
MTBA and California Fish and Game Code(Sections 3503, 3503.5 and 3513)and
contains suitable burrowing owl habitat.The proposed grading operations associated with
the Project could result in significant impacts to suitable nesting habitat for raptors and
birds,including the California horned lark and to suitable burrowing owl habitat.
As described below,the potential impact to suitable nesting habitat for raptors and birds,
and to suitable burrowing owl habitat would be reduced to less than significant.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant raptors and birds nesting habitat and
burrowing owl habitat as identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measures would reduce impacts to raptors and birds nesting
habitat and burrowing owl habitat to less than significant.
Mitigation Measures MM-BIO-1: Within three days of the start of any ground-
disturbing activity during the nesting season(February 1 to August 31 for songbirds;
January 15 to August 31 for raptors),a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey to
determine if there are active nests within the onsite trees and vegetation. If an active
C nest is not found,no biological monitor is required. If active nests are detected,a
minimum buffer(e.g., 300 feet for songbirds or 500 feet for raptors)around the nest
shall be delineated and flagged,and no construction activity shall occur within the
buffer area until a qualified biologist determines the nesting species have fledged and
is no longer active or the nest has failed.The buffer may be modified(i.e.,increased
or decreased)and/or other recommendations proposed(e.g.,a temporary soundwall)
as determined appropriate by the qualified biologist to minimize impacts.The
qualified biologist shall monitor the removal of onsite trees and vegetation.Nest
buffer distance will be based on species,specific location of the nest,the intensity of
construction activities,existing disturbances unrelated to the project and other
factors.
Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-2: Prior to the start of any ground-disturbing
activity,each project applicant shall conduct protocol BUOW surveys in accordance
with the protocols established by CDFW in the CDFW 2012 Staff Report on
Burrowing Owl Mitigation to confirm the presence/absence of BUOW within the
Project Site and the buffer area identified within the CDFW protocol; namely,a
breeding season survey consisting of four visits(one during the period February 15—
April 15;two visits,at least three weeks apart,between April 15 and June 15;and a
fourth visit after June 15,to be conducted at least three weeks after the third visit),
and a one-day pre-construction survey to take place no more than 14 days before
beginning ground-disturbing activities on the Project Site. For the timings of the
breeding season surveys,these may be modified in collaboration with CDFW. If the
burrowing owl is present,protective measures, including active or passive relocation,
shall be developed in consultation with CDFW to ensure compliance with the
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 9 ESA /0181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overnding Considerations
Findings and Fads in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Migratory Bird Treaty Act and other applicable CDFW Code requirements and
include,but are not limited to the following:
• Occupied BUOW shall not be disturbed during nesting season unless a qualified
biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either 1)the birds have not
begun egg-laying or incubation or 2)that juveniles from the occupied burrows
are foraging independently and are capable of an independent survival flight.
• A burrowing owl relocation plan shall be prepared that recommends methods
needed to relocate the burrowing owls from the project site and provide measures
that will be implemented for the maintenance,monitoring,and reporting of the
relocated burrowing owls to increase chances of survivorship and better ensure
compliance with CDFW guidelines.This plan shall be implemented during the
non-breeding season,and prior to seasonal rains to promote the best outcome for
conservation of the burrowing owl.
In addition to the above,each project applicant can choose to conduct additional
BUOW surveys in advance of the prescribed pre-construction survey(s)protocol
established by CDFW in order to assess the presence/absence of BUOW on the
project site. Surveys conducted earlier than the prescribed pre-construction surveys
per CDFW guidelines,would allow each project applicant to start early consultation
with CDFW regarding BUOW relocation(assuming BUOW are present within the
project site)well in advance of project construction activities. However,early
surveys and consultation with CDFW does not eliminate the need to conduct a pre-
construction clearance survey in accordance with CDFW guidelines.The pre-
construction clearance survey shall be conducted within 14 days of ground
disturbance to document the continued absence of burrowing owl from the project
site as well as the buffer areas. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than
30 days after the clearance survey,the project site as well as the buffer areas shall be
resurveyed.
All protective measures,including relocation,shall be reviewed and approved by the
CDFW prior to the initiating any ground disturbing activities.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
With the implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1,a qualified biologist would
conduct a survey of active nests if construction activities were to occur during the
nesting season. If nests are present,the qualified biologist would establish a
minimum buffer around the nest so that no construction activities would occur within
the buffer area.The implementation of Mitigation B10-1 would reduce potential
impacts to nesting raptors and birds to less than significant.
With the implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2,a protocol survey prior to
construction activities would occur to ensure that no burrowing owls were present on
tat the site. If the burrowing owl is present,buffer areas identified within the CDFW
protocol would be required to be established and a burrowing owl relocation plan
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 10 ESA /0181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Firdngs and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
would be implemented. The implementation of Mitigation Measure BI0-2 would
reduce potential impacts to burrowing owls to less than significant.
C. Cultural Resources
1. Historical Resources(Project and Cumulative)
The Project has the potential to impact historical resources on the portions within the
Harveston Specific Plan area. Although the Eastern Information Center(EIC)records
search did not identify known archaeological or historic architectural resources within the
Project,the subsurface archaeological sensitivity analysis indicates that the Project area
has low potential to contain subsurface archaeological resources. Although no known
historical resources were identified within the Project area,there exists the possibility,
however slight,that Project-related ground disturbing activities may encounter disturbed
and/or intact archaeological deposits that may qualify as historical resources.Therefore,
the Project has the potential to cause a substantial change in the significance of a
historical resource.
As described below,potential impacts to historical resources would be reduced to less
than significant.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts to historical resources
as identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts to historical
resources to less than significant.
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Prior to issuance of each grading permit and prior to
the start of any ground-disturbing activity,each project applicant shall retain a
qualified archaeologist,defined as an archeologist meeting the Secretary of the
Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archeology(U.S. Department of
Interior 2012)and as approved by the City of Temecula,to provide archaeological
expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archeological resources
(Mitigation Measures CUL 2 through CUL-7).
Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Prior to any ground disturbing activities associated
with the Project,the qualified archaeologist shall conduct cultural resources
sensitivity training for all construction personnel.Construction personnel shall be
informed of the types of archaeological resources that may be encountered,and of the
proper procedures to be enacted in the event of an inadvertent discovery of
archaeological resources or human remains. Each project applicant shall ensure that
construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and retain
documentation demonstrating attendance.
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 11 ESA!D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overnding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Mitigation Measure CUL-3: If grading activities are proposed within intact native
sediments on the Project Site which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater,
the qualified archaeologist shall monitor ground disturbing activities. If cultural
resources are discovered,the qualified archaeologist shall have the authority to stop
and redirect grading in the immediate area of a find in order to evaluate the find and
determine the appropriate next steps in consultation with the City of Temecula and
the Pechanga Tribe. During the course of monitoring, if the qualified archaeologist
can demonstrate based on observations of subsurface conditions that the level of
monitoring should be reduced,increased,or discontinued,the archaeologist,in
consultation with each project applicant and the City of Temecula may adjust the
level of monitoring,as warranted.
Mitigation Measure CUL-4: If grading activities occur within previously graded
sediments and inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are
discovered,each construction contractor shall suspend grading within 100 feet of the
find until the qualified archaeologist evaluates the find and determines the
appropriate next steps in consultation with the City of Temecula and the Pechanga
Tribe.
Mitigation Measure CUL-5: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural
resources are discovered either within the intact native sediments or previously
graded sediments,grading activities shall be suspended within 100 feet of the find
and each project applicant,the qualified archaeologist,and the Pechanga Tribe shall
assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the
mitigation for such resources.
• Pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2(b),avoidance is the preferred method of
preservation for archaeological resources.
• If preservation in place is not feasible,each project applicant and Pechanga Tribe
shall discuss reburial of the resources on the Project property,in perpetuity.The
measures for reburial shall include,at least,the following: Measures and
provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in
perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic
recordation have been completed,with an exception that sacred items,burial
goods and Native American human remains are excluded.Any reburial process
shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial
shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report.The Phase IV Report shall
be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public
Records Request.
• If each project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance
or the mitigation for such resources,these issues will be presented to the
Planning Director for decision.The Planning Director will make the
determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act with respect to archaeological resources and will take into account the
religious beliefs,customs,and practices of the Pechanga Tribe.Notwithstanding
any other rights available under the law,the decision of the Planning Director
will be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City of Temecula
City Council.
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 12 ESA/D181343
Findings and Fads in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
• Any newly discovered cultural resources shall be subject to a cultural resources
evaluation pursuant to state law prior to restarting grading within 100 feet of the
discovered resources.The cultural resources evaluation of the newly discovered
cultural resources shall be detailed in a Cultural Resources Treatment Plan
("Plan"). Furthermore,after ground disturbing activities are completed,the
archeologist shall prepare a monitoring report(consistent with the County of
Riverside Phase IV monitoring report requirements)and submit the monitoring
report to the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe.
Mitigation Measure CUL-6:The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all
cultural resources,including sacred items.burial goods and all archaeological
artifacts that are recovered as a result of Project implementation to the Pechanga
Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.
Mitigation Measure CUL-7: The developer is required to enter into a Cultural
Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe.The agreement shall be in
place prior to issuance of each grading permit.To accomplish this,each project
applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than
60 days prior to issuance of each grading permit. This Agreement will address the
treatment and disposition of cultural resources,the designation,responsibilities,and
participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading,excavation
and ground disturbing activities;project grading and development scheduling;terms
of compensation for the monitors;and treatment and final disposition of any cultural
resources,sacred sites,and human remains discovered onsite.The Pechanga
monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with
the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential
resources discovered on the property.Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be
allowed to monitor all grading,excavation and groundbreaking activities,and shall
also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an
inadvertent cultural resource be identified.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The Project would comply with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064.5(b)(1),and
15064.5(bx4),which require a lead agency to identify feasible measures to mitigate a
substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.Mitigation
Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7 present feasible measures to reduce substantial
adverse changes in the significance of historical resources by requiring qualified
technical specialists to provide oversight and worker training,as well as define the
specialists' qualifications.These measures also provide clear parameters for resource
monitoring and steps to be executed if a cultural resources qualifying as unique
archaeological resources are discovered. With implementation of these measures,
impacts to resources qualifying as historical resources would be less than significant.
2. Unique Archeological Resources(Project and Cumulative)
The Project has the potential to impact unique archeological resources on the portions
within the Harveston Specific Plan area.Although the Eastern Information Center(EIC)
records search did not identify known archaeological or historic architectural resources
Harveston GPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 13 ESA /D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overnding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
within the Project,the subsurface archaeological sensitivity analysis indicates that the
Project area has low potential to contain subsurface archaeological resources. Although
no known archaeological resources were identified within the Project area,there exist the
possibility,however slight,that archaeological resources that qualify as unique
archaeological resources could be encountered during Project-related ground disturbance
within intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on
the Project Site.Therefore,the Project has the potential to cause a substantial change in
the significance of a unique archeological resource. As described below,these impacts
can be mitigated to less than significant levels.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts to unique
archaeological resources as identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts to unique
archaeological resources to less than significant.
Mitigation: Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The Project would comply with CEQA Section 21083.1(a),which requires
reasonable efforts be made to preserve in place any and all identified unique
archaeological resources,as defined in Section 21083.2,that a lead agency has
determined would be significantly impacted by a project. Mitigation Measures CUL-
1 through CUL-7 present reasonable efforts for the preservation in place of unique
archaeological resources by requiring qualified technical specialists to provide
oversight and worker training,as well as define the specialists' qualifications.These
measures also provide clear parameters for resource monitoring and steps to be
executed if a cultural resources qualifying as unique archaeological resources are
discovered. With implementation of these measures, impacts to unique
archaeological resources would be less than significant.
3. Human Remains(Project and Cumulative)
There are no human remains known to exist within the Project,and given past mass
grading,the potential for intact human remains is extremely low within previously
disturbed sediments. However,should Project ground disturbing activities extend into
intact native sediments underlying the zone subject to mass sheet grading in 2003,it is
possible that such actions could unearth,expose,or disturb previously unknown human
remains.Therefore,the Project has the potential to disturb human remains and impacts
would be potentially significant.
As described below,these impacts can be reduced to less than significant.
Harveston GPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 14 ESA I D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overndmg Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts to human remains as
identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measure would reduce potential impacts to human remains
to less than significant.
Mitigation Measure CUL-8: If human remains are encountered,California Health
and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the
Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further,
pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98(b),remains shall be left in place and free from
disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If
the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American,the
NAHC must be contacted within 24 hours.The NAHC must then immediately
identify the MLD upon receiving notification of the discovery. The MLD shall then
make recommendations within 48 hours and engage in consultation concerning the
treatment of the remains as provided in PRC Section 5097.98.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The Project would comply with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5
and California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98,which require protocols to be
implemented should human remains be identified during excavation activities.
Mitigation Measure CUL-8 includes the requirements as outlined in California
Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and California Public Resources Code
Section 5097.98,and would reduce potential impacts on human remains to less than
significant.
4. Paleontological Resources(Project and Cumulative)
The Project is underlain by the Pauba Formation,which is known to contain vertebrate
fossils of late Irvingtonian and early Rancholabrean ages,and the Natural History
Museum of Los Angeles County(LACM)records search has identified a number of
fossil localities associated with the Pauba Formation within approximately 0.5 mile of the
Project.As such,the Pauba Formation has a high paleontological sensitivity,and there
exists the possibility that Project-related ground disturbing activities extending beyond
the disturbed zone previously subject to mass sheet grading in 2003 could result in
significant impacts to paleontological resources.
As described below,these impacts can be reduced to less than significant.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts to paleontological
resources as identified in the Final SEIR.
Harveston SPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 15 ESA I D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
The following mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts to paleontological
resources to less than significant.
Mitigation Measure CUL-9: Prior to the start of earth moving activities,each
project applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist defined as one meeting SVP
standards(Society for Vertebrate Paleontology,2010)to attend any pre-grade
construction meetings to determine when and where excavations extend into intact
native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project
Site Working with each project applicant and the construction crew,the qualified
paleontologist shall determine a paleontological monitoring schedule.
The qualified paleontologist,or a paleontological monitor working under the direct
supervision of the qualified paleontologist,shall monitor all ground-disturbing
activity that are proposed to extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated
to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site.The location,duration,and timing
of monitoring shall be determined by the qualified paleontologist designated for the
Project in consultation with each project applicant and City and shall be based on a
review of geologic maps and grading plans. During the course of monitoring, if the
qualified paleontologist can demonstrate based on observations of subsurface
conditions that the level of monitoring should be reduced,increased,or discontinued,
the paleontologist, in consultation with each project applicant and City of Temecula
may adjust the level of monitoring,as warranted.
Monitoring activities shall be documented in a Paleontological Resources Monitoring
Report to be prepared by the qualified paleontologist at the completion of
construction and shall be provided to the City of Temecula and filed with the Natural
History Museum of Los Angeles County within six(6)months of grading completion
for each individual project on the Project Site.
Mitigation Measure CUL-10: Prior to start of earth moving activities that are
proposed to extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in
depth or greater on the Project Site,the qualified paleontologist shall conduct pre-
construction worker paleontological resources sensitivity training.This training shall
include information on what types of paleontological resources could be encountered
during excavations,what to do in case an unanticipated discovery is made by a
worker,and laws protecting paleontological resources.All construction personnel
shall be informed of the possibility of encountering fossils and instructed to
immediately inform the construction foreman or supervisor if any bones or other
potential fossils are unexpectedly unearthed in an area where a paleontological
monitor is not present.
Mitigation Measure CUL-11: In the event of unanticipated discovery of
paleontological resources when a paleontological monitor is not present,each
construction contractor shall cease ground-disturbing activities within 50 feet of the
find until it can be assessed by the qualified paleontologist.The qualified
paleontologist shall assess the find,implement recovery and reporting measures,if
necessary,and determine if paleontological monitoring is warranted once work
resumes.
Harveston GPAlSPA—Planning Area 12 16 ESA 1 D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The Project would comply with Public Resources Code(PRC)Section 5097.5 and
Section 30244,which require reasonable mitigation of adverse impacts to
paleontological resources from developments on public(state,county,city,district)
lands. Mitigation Measures CUL-9 through CUL-11 present reasonable mitigation of
adverse impacts to paleontological resources by requiring qualified technical
specialists to provide oversight and worker training,as well as define the specialists'
qualifications.These measures also provide clear parameters for resource monitoring
and steps to be executed if a paleontological resource is discovered. With
implementation of these measures,impacts to paleontological resources would be
less than significant.
D. Noise(Cumulative)
1. Operational Noise
New development within the Project area may introduce noise levels that could exceed
the City's exterior and interior noise standards at future onsite residential locations.
Temecula's Noise Element includes an exterior noise standard of 65 dBA CNEL or Ldn
for outdoor living areas such as backyard associated with residential uses and an interior
noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL or Ldn. Specifically,new development within the
Project area could expose nearby onsite sensitive receptors to exterior noise levels
exceeding 65 dBA Ldn over ambient levels and expose nearby onsite sensitive receptors
to interior noise levels exceeding 45 dBA Ldn due to traffic levels,thus resulting in
potentially significant noise impacts to onsite sensitive receptors.The onsite sensitive
receptors could be exposed to significant exterior and interior noise levels from future
traffic noise levels along(1)Ynez Road from Date Street to Country Center Drive,(2)
Ynez Road from Date Street to Waverly Lane,(3)Date Street/French Valley Parkway
from Ynez Road to the I-15/French Valley Parkway Interchange,(4)1-15 North of the I-
15/French Valley Parkway Interchange,(5)1-15 South of the I-15/French Valley
Parkway Interchange.
As described below,these impacts can be reduced to less than significant.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant exterior and interior noise
impacts as identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measures would reduce potential exterior and interior noise
impacts to less than significant.
Harveston GPAJSPA—Planning Area 12 17 ESA/D181343
Fndngs and Feds in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Exterior Noise Mitigation
Mitigation Measure N-1: Ynez Road from Date Street to County Center Drive:
Prior to the issuance of each building permit,each project applicant shall provide
noise attenuation features to residences located within 304 feet of the Ynez Road
centerline.The noise attenuation features shall achieve an exterior noise standard of
65 dBA CNEL or Ldn or lower for outdoor living areas such as backyards associated
with residential uses.The noise attenuation features to achieve the exterior noise
standards could include sound walls,berms,or a combination of the two. For those
residences proposed to be located within 304 feet of Ynez Road between Date Street
and County Center Drive,each project applicant shall demonstrate that the City's
exterior noise standards will be achieved through the preparation and submittal of a
Noise Study to the City of Temecula Community Development Department. Building
permits shall not be issued for these residences until the City of Temecula verifies
that the City's exterior noise standards have been achieved.
Mitigation Measure N-2: Ynez Road from Date Street to Waverly Lane: Prior to the
issuance of each building permit,each project applicant shall provide noise
attenuation features to residences located within 271 feet of the Ynez Road
centerline.The noise attenuation features shall achieve an exterior noise standard of
65 dBA CNEL or Ldn or lower for outdoor living areas such as backyards associated
with residential uses.The noise attenuation features to achieve the exterior noise
standards could include sound walls,berms,or a combination of the two. For those
residences proposed to be located within 271 feet of Ynez Road between Date Street
and Waverly Lane,each project applicant shall demonstrate that the City's exterior
noise standards will be achieved through the preparation and submittal of a Noise
Study to the City of Temecula Community Development Department. Building
permits shall not be issued for these residences until the City of Temecula verifies
that the City's exterior noise standards have been achieved.
Mitigation Measure N-3: Date Street/French Valley Parkway from Ynez Road to
the 115/French Valley Parkway Interchange: Prior to the issuance of each building
permit, each project applicant shall provide noise attenuation features to residences
located within 551 feet of the Date Street/French Valley Parkway centerline.The
noise attenuation features shall achieve an exterior noise standard of 65 dBA CNEL
or Ldn or lower for outdoor living areas such as backyards associated with residential
uses.The noise attenuation features to achieve the exterior noise standards could
include sound walls,berms,or a combination of the two. For those residences
proposed to be located within 551 feet of Date Street/French Valley Parkway
between Ynez Road to the I 15/French Valley Parkway Interchange,each project
applicant shall demonstrate that the City's exterior noise standards will be achieved
through the preparation and submittal of a Noise Study to the City of Temecula
Community Development Department.Building permits shall not be issued for these
residences until the City of Temecula verifies that the City's exterior noise standards
have been achieved.
Mitigation Measure N-4: I 15 North of the Future 115/French Valley Interchange:
Prior to the issuance of each building permit,each project applicant shall provide
noise attenuation features to residences located anywhere on the Project Site.The
noise attenuation features shall achieve an exterior noise standard of 65 dBA CNEL
or Ldn or lower for outdoor living areas such as backyards associated with residential
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 18 ESA/D181343
Findings and Fads in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
uses.The features to attenuate freeway noise levels so that the exterior noise
standards could be achieved include sound walls,berms,or a combination of the two.
Each project applicant shall demonstrate that the City's exterior standards will be
achieved through the preparation and submittal of a Noise Study to the City of
Temecula Community Development Department.Building permits shall not be
issued for these residences until the City of Temecula verifies that the City's exterior
noise standards have been achieved.
Mitigation Measure N-5: 115 South of the Future 115/French Valley Interchange:
Prior to the issuance of each building permit,each project applicant shall provide
noise attenuation features to residences located anywhere on the Project Site.The
noise attenuation features shall achieve an exterior noise standard of 65 dBA CNEL
or Ldn or lower for outdoor living areas such as backyards associated with residential
uses.The features to attenuate freeway noise levels so that the exterior noise
standards could be achieved include sound walls,berms,or a combination of the two.
Each project applicant shall demonstrate that the City's exterior noise standards will
be achieved through the preparation and submittal of a Noise Study to the City of
Temecula Community Development Department. Building permits shall not be
issued for these residences until the City of Temecula verifies that the City's exterior
noise standards have been achieved.
Interior Noise Mitigation
Mitigation Measure N-6:Ynez Road from Date Street to County Center Drive:
Prior to the issuance of each building permit,each project applicant shall provide
noise attenuation features to residences located within 121 feet of the Ynez Road
centerline to achieve the interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL or Ldn. Windows
proposed within 121 feet from the Ynez Road centerline need to be upgraded with
sound transmission class rating(STC)higher than standard building construction
(i.e.,windows ranging up to STC-28). Each project applicant shall demonstrate that
the City's interior noise standards will be achieved through the preparation and
submittal of a Noise Study to the City of Temecula Community Development
Department. Building permits shall not be issued for these residences until the City of
Temecula verifies that the City's interior noise standards have been achieved.
Mitigation Measure N-7: Ynez Road from Date Street to Waverly Lane: Prior to the
issuance of each building permit,each project applicant shall provide noise
attenuation features to residences located within 108 feet of the Ynez Road centerline
to achieve the interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL or Ldn. Windows proposed
within 108 feet from the Ynez Road centerline need to be upgraded with sound
transmission class rating(STC)higher than standard building construction(i.e.,
windows ranging up to STC-28). Each project applicant shall demonstrate that the
City's interior noise standards will be achieved through the preparation and submittal
of a Noise Study to the City of Temecula Community Development Department.
Building permits shall not be issued for these residences until the City of Temecula
verifies that the City's interior noise standards have been achieved.
Mitigation Measure N-8: Date Street/French Valley Parkway from Ynez Road to
the 115/French Valley Parkway Interchange: Prior to the issuance of each building
permit,each project applicant shall provide noise attenuation features to residences
located within 219 feet of the Ynez Road centerline to achieve the interior noise
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 19 ESA I D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Finings and Statement of October2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
standard of 45 dBA CNEL or Ldn. Windows proposed within 219 feet from the Ynez
Road centerline need to be upgraded with sound transmission class rating(STC)
higher than standard building construction(i.e.,windows ranging up to STC-28).
Each project applicant shall demonstrate that the City's interior noise standards will
be achieved through the preparation and submittal of a Noise Study to the City of
Temecula Community Development Department. Building permits shall not be
issued for these residences until the City of Temecula verifies that the City's interior
noise standards have been achieved.
Mitigation Measure N-9: I-15 North of the future I 15/French Valley Interchange:
Prior to the issuance of each building permit,each project applicant shall provide
noise attenuation features for all onsite residences to achieve the interior noise
standard of 45 dBA CNEL or Ldn. Windows proposed within each residence need to
be upgraded with sound transmission class rating(STC)higher than standard
building construction would provide. Each project applicant shall demonstrate that
the City's interior noise standards will be achieved through the preparation and
submittal of a Noise Study to the City of Temecula Community Development
Department. Building permits shall not be issued for these residences until the City of
Temecula verifies that the City's interior noise standards have been achieved.
Mitigation Measure N-10: I-15 South of the future I 15/French Valley Interchange:
Prior to the issuance of each building permit,each project applicant shall provide
noise attenuation features for all onsite residences to achieve the interior noise
standard of 45 dBA CNEL or Ldn. Windows proposed within each residence need to
be upgraded with sound transmission class rating(STC)higher than standard
building construction would provide. Each project applicant shall demonstrate that
the City's interior noise standards will be achieved through the preparation and
submittal of a Noise Study to the City of Temecula Community Development
Department. Building permits shall not be issued for these residences until the City of
Temecula verifies that the City's interior noise standards have been achieved.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The implementation of Mitigation Measures N-1 through N-5 would reduce exterior
noise levels to achieve the exterior noise standard of 65 dBA CNEL or Ldn.This
reduction would result in a less than significant impact.The implementation of
Mitigation Measures N-6 through N-10 would reduce interior noise levels to achieve
the interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL or Ldn.This reduction would result in a
less than significant impact.
E. Transportation
1. Impacts on Transportation from Existing(2019)Conditions With Project(Project)
The Project would result in the generation of 8,648 daily trips.These increase trips were
distributed on the surrounding roadway network using the RivTAM traffic model and the
distribution was manually refined based on the understanding of roadway conditions and
local traffic patterns. After distribution of Project traffic,levels of service and increase in
delay at intersections were evaluated.According to the City of Temecula Traffic Impact
Harveston GPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 20 ESA 1 D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Analysis Guidelines,"an increase in delay at an intersection of 2.0 seconds or more at
intersections operating at an unacceptable level shall be considered a significant impact
and mitigation measures will be required to reduce the delay to pre-project or acceptable
conditions."The Project is not responsible for mitigating intersections for which the
Project does not cause in an increase in delay of 2.0 or more seconds,even if the
intersection is operating at an unacceptable LOS(LOS E or LOS F). Based on the
evaluation in the Traffic Study,the Ynez Road/Waverly Lane intersection is projected to
operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour for Existing(2019)Conditions(With Project)
with a change in average control delay of 28.8 seconds. As such,the Project is forecast to
result in a significant impact at Ynez Road/Waverly Lane intersection under Existing
(2019)Conditions With Project.
As described below,the impact at the Ynez Road/Waverly Lane intersection can be
reduced to less than significant level.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impact at the Ynez
Road/Waverly Lane intersection as identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measure would reduce the potential impact at the Ynez
Road/Waverly Lane intersection to less than significant.
Mitigation Measure T-1: Ynez Road and Waverly Lane: Prior to the first building
permit,the developer shall install a traffic signal with left and right turns permitted.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
After implementation of Mitigation Measure T-1,the intersection at Ynez Road&
Waverly Lane would operate at an acceptable LOS A with a delay of 4.9 seconds.
With implementation of this mitigation,this impact would be reduced to less than
significant.
2. Impacts on Transportation from Cumulative Year(2024)Conditions With Project
(Cumulative)
Ambient growth rates and traffic assumed from local pending and approved development
projects were applied to develop Cumulative Year(2024)Conditions Without Project
traffic forecasts.Growth rates gathered from the RivTAM model were used to create
ambient traffic forecasts for this scenario.The City of Temecula provided a list of
pending and approved development projects assumed to be in operation by 2024 as well
as assuming that the I-I 5/French Valley Parkway Interchange project would be
constructed. With the addition of Project traffic,the Ynez Road/Waverly Lane
intersection would operate at LOS F during the PM peak hour for Cumulative(2024)
Conditions With Project with a change in average control delay of 23.3 seconds which is
considered a significant cumulative impact.
Harveston GPAJSPA—Planning Area 12 21 ESA!D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
r-
As described below,the 2024 cumulative impact at the Ynez Road/Waverly Lane
intersection can be reduced to less than significant.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential 2024 cumulative significant impact at the
Ynez Road/Waverly Lane intersection as identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measure would reduce the potential 2024 cumulative
impact at the Ynez Road/Waverly Lane intersection to less than significant.
Mitigation: Implementation of Mitigation Measure T-1.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
After implementation of Mitigation Measure T-1, the intersection at Ynez Road&
Waverly Lane would improve during the PM peak hour from LOS F to LOS C or
better. Therefore,with the implementation of Mitigation Measure T-1,the Project
would result in a less than significant 2024 cumulative impact at this intersection.
3. Impacts on Transportation from General Plan Buildout(2035)Conditions(With Project)
A detailed travel demand model was used to evaluate growth within the City of Temecula
and in the surrounding region. RivTAM utilizes inputs such as land use,travel behavior,
and roadway network characteristics(number of lanes,speed,etc.)to estimate traffic
demand on area roadways. The model is calibrated specifically to evaluate Riverside
County and meets state and federal guidelines for model calibration. Model traffic
volume growth from base year to future year was applied to the existing(2019)traffic
counts to develop the General Plan Buildout(2035)Conditions(Without Project)traffic
forecasts.
The project trip generation estimates were applied to the traffic forecasts developed for
General Plan Buildout(2035)Conditions Without Project.The addition of the General
Plan Buildout roadway improvement did not impact trip distribution.
Based on the traffic evaluation,the Ynez Road/Waverly Lane would operate at LOS F
during the AM and PM peak hour for General Plan Buildout(2035)Conditions With
Project with a change in average control delay of 12.7 seconds during the AM peak hour
and 34.6 sections during the PM peak hour. As such, the Project is forecast to result in a
significant impact at Ynez Road/Waverly Lane under General Plan Buildout(2035)
Conditions With Project.
As described below,the 2035 cumulative impact at the Ynez Road/Waverly Lane
intersection can be reduced to less than significant.
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 22 ESA /D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential 2035 cumulative significant impact at the
Ynez Road/Waverly Lane intersection as identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measure would reduce the potential 2035 cumulative
impact at the Ynez Road/Waverly Lane intersection to less than significant.
Mitigation: Implementation of Mitigation Measure T-1.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
After implementation of Mitigation Measure T-1, the intersection at Ynez Road&
Waverly Lane would improve during the AM and PM peak hour from LOS F to LOS
A and LOS B, respectively. Therefore, with the implementation of Mitigation
Measure T-1,the Project would result in a less than significant 2035 cumulative
impact at this intersection.
F. Tribal Cultural Resources
1. Tribal Cultural Resources(Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k))(Project and
Cumulative)
The Project Site has undergone mass sheet grading in 2003 as part of the Harveston
Specific Plan development.The mass grading extending to depths of 10 to 24 feet below
surface, which removed all surface native soils that could have contained tribal cultural
resources. Although no known resources were identified within the Project area,there
exists the possibility, however slight,that Project-related ground disturbing activities may
encounter disturbed and/or intact tribal cultural resources that may qualify as historical
resources.Therefore,the Project has the potential to cause a substantial change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource that is eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). As described below,these impacts can be
mitigated to less than significant levels.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts to tribal cultural
resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)as identified in the
Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts to tribal cultural
resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)to less than
significant.
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 23 ESA!D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Mitigation: Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The Project would comply with PRC Section 21082.3,which requires any mitigation
measures agreed upon in the consultation conducted pursuant to Section 21080.3.2
shall be recommended for inclusion in the environmental document and in an
adopted mitigation monitoring and reporting program, if determined to avoid or
lessen the impact pursuant to paragraph(2)of subdivision(b),and shall be fully
enforceable.The measures should be feasible to avoid or substantially lessen the
impact on the identified tribal cultural resource. Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through
CUL-7 are feasible measures that will substantially lessen potential impacts to tribal
cultural resources should they be identified during project construction. With
implementation of these measures, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less
than significant.
2. Tribal Cultural Resources(Public Resources Code section 5024.1)(Project and
Cumulative)
The Project Site has undergone mas sheet grading in 2003 as part of the Harveston
Specific Plan development.The mass grading extending to depths of 10 to 24 feet below
surface,which removed all surface native soils that could have contained tribal cultural
resources. Although no known resources were identified within the Project area,there
exists the possibility,however slight,that Project-related ground disturbing activities may
encounter disturbed and/or intact tribal cultural resources that may qualify as historical
resources.Therefore,the Project has the potential to cause a substantial change in the
significance of a tribal cultural resource that is a resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence,to be significant pursuant to
criteria set forth in subdivision(c)of Public Resources Code section 5024.1. As
described below,these impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in,or incorporated into,the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant impacts to tribal cultural
resources as defined in subdivision(c)of Public Resources Code section 5024.1 as
identified in the Final SEIR.
The following mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts to tribal cultural
resources as defined in subdivision(c)of Public Resources Code section 5024.1 to
less than significant.
Mitigation: Implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7.
Harveston GPAISPA—Planning Area 12 24 ESA I D181343
Fmdrngs and Facts in Support of Fmd,ngs and Statement of October 2020
Ovemdmg Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
b) Facts in Support of Findings
The Project would comply with PRC Section 21082.3,which requires any mitigation
measures agreed upon in the consultation conducted pursuant to Section 21080.3.2
shall be recommended for inclusion in the environmental document and in an
adopted mitigation monitoring and reporting program, if determined to avoid or
lessen the impact pursuant to paragraph(2)of subdivision(b),and shall be fully
enforceable. The measures should be feasible to avoid or substantially lessen the
impact on the identified tribal cultural resource. Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through
CUL-7 are feasible measures that will substantially lessen potential impacts to tribal
cultural resource should they be identified during project construction. With
implementation of these measures, impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less
than significant.
V. Potentially Significant Environmental Impacts
Determined to be Significant and Unavoidable
In the environmental topical area of Air Quality,there are instances where potential
environmental impacts would remain significant and unavoidable despite the inclusion of all
feasible mitigation,as discussed below:
A. Air Quality
1. Violation of Air Quality Standards—Operation(Project and Cumulative)
Operation of the Project would result in long-term regional emissions of ozone precursors
(NOx and ROG)associated with area sources,such as natural gas consumption,
landscaping, applications of architectural coatings,and consumer products, in addition to
operational mobile emissions. According to the Project's Traffic Study(refer to
Appendix I, of this Draft SEIR),development of the Project would result in an increase in
8,648 daily vehicle trips.
Modeled operations emissions are presented in Table 3.1-8. As shown,the Project would
result in long-term regional emissions of NOx(79 lbs/day)and ROG (65 lbs/day)that
would exceed the SCAQMD's thresholds for NOx and ROG of 75 lbs/day.Therefore,
operational NOx and ROG emissions would have the potential to result in significant
regional impacts.
a) Findings
Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that
avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect as
identified in the SEIR.
1�.
Harveston GPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 25 ESA /D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Specific economic,legal,social,technological,or other considerations,including
provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers,make infeasible
the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final SEIR.
Mitigation: Implement Mitigation Measure AQ-2.
b) Facts in Support of Findings
Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2 would reduce NOx and ROG emissions
by increasing energy efficiencies and reducing vehicle miles traveled. However,
because the Project does not have a specific design,nor the total number of units to
be constructed is known,the reductions that would be afforded by the
implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2 cannot be quantified. It is not possible,
without specific Project data,to identify which and to what extent the measures
identified under Mitigation Measure AQ-2 would be implemented.Therefore,while
implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2 will result in reduced NOx and ROG
emissions, it is not possible to determine if these reductions will be sufficient to
reduce emissions to below regulatory thresholds.Therefore,with the implementation
of Mitigation Measure AQ-2,which bans the inclusion of fireplaces in the residential
development,ROG and NOx emissions would be reduced to 63 lbs/day and 64
lbs/day,respectively,but both emissions would continue to exceed the SCAQMD
regional significance threshold of 55 lbs/day and the impact would be significant and
unavoidable.
VI. Project Alternatives
A. Alternatives Considered but Rejected in the Program SEIR
An EIR must briefly describe the rationale for selection and rejection of alternatives.The
Lead Agency may make an initial determination as to which alternatives are potentially
feasible and,therefore,merit in-depth consideration,and which are clearly infeasible.
Alternatives that are remote or speculative,or the effects of which cannot be reasonably
predicted,need not be considered(CEQA Guidelines,Section 15126.6(f)(3)).
The development of the Project on an alternative site was not considered feasible,because no
other sites are owned or controlled by the Project Applicant.No other sites were identified
that would support the Project and meet the project objectives based on size,configuration,
location,and proximity to existing infrastructure. Furthermore,the use of an alternative site
would be expected to result in the same or similar environmental impacts as the Project.
Accordingly,an alternative site was rejected from further consideration.
B. Alternatives Considered in the Program EIR
Four alternative scenarios,representing a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project,were
selected for detailed analysis. The goal for evaluating these alternatives is to identify ways to
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 26 ESA/0181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
avoid or lessen the significant environmental effects resulting from implementation of the
Project,while attaining most of the project objectives.
The following sections provide a general description of each alternative,its ability to meet the
project objectives,and a qualitative discussion of its comparative environmental impacts.As
provided in Section 15126.6(d)of the CEQA Guidelines,the significant effects of these
alternatives are identified in less detail than the analysis of the Project in Chapter 3 of this
SEIR.
• No Project/No Development Alternative(Alternative 1)
• No Project/Existing Specific Plan Alternative(Alternative 2)
• Mixed Residential Development Alternative(Alternative 3)
• Alternative/Mixed Land Use Alternative(Alternative 4)
1. Alternative 1 —No Project/No Development Alternative
a) Summary of Alternative
The No Project/No Development Alternative(Alternative 1)assumes that the
proposed General Plan Amendment(GPA)to update the land use designation from
Service Commercial(SC)to Specific Plan Implementation(SPI)and the proposed
Specific Plan Amendment(SPA)that would include a residential overlay would not
be adopted and not implemented. Further,the No Project/No Development
Alternative also assumes no development would occur with the current land use
designation of Service Commercial(SC).The Project Site would be left in its current
undeveloped and previously graded state.
b) Reasons for Rejecting Alternative
The No Project/No Development Alternative would result in no environmental
impacts. As a result,this alternative would have less overall environmental impacts
compared to the Project. However,this Alternative would not meet any of the project
objectives. In addition,this Alternative would not support the development
objectives for the Harveston General Plan Amendment/Specific Plan amendment for
Planning Area 12. The City Council hereby finds that each of the reasons set forth
above is an independent ground for rejecting Alternative 1,and by itself, independent
of any other reason,justifies rejection of Alternative 1.
2. Alternative 2—No Project/Existing Specific Plan Alternative
a) Summary of Alternative
The No Project/Existing Specific Plan Alternative(Alternative 2)assumes that the
proposed General Plan Amendment(GPA)to update the land use designation from
Service Commercial(SC)to Specific Plan Implementation(SPI)and the proposed
Specific Plan Amendment(SPA)that would include a residential overlay would not
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 27 ESA I D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
be adopted and not implemented. Instead,Alternative 2 assumes the current land use
designation of Service Commercial(SC)would remain,and there would be no
residential overlay within Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. Based on
the Temecula General Plan Land Use Element,the target floor area ratio for service
commercial is 0.3.Therefore,the estimated buildable square footage for the 87.54-
acre Project Site is approximately 1,143,973 square feet3 of service commercial uses.
b) Reasons for Rejecting Alternative
The No Project/Existing Specific Plan Alternative(Alternative 2)would result in the
same impacts compared to the Project related to odors,biological resources,cultural
resources,excessive groundborne vibrations,and tribal cultural resources.
Alternative 2 would result in less impacts compared to the Project related to land use
and planning,noise,population and housing,public services,recreation,and utilities
and service systems.The No Project/Existing Specific Plan Alternative would result
in greater impacts compared to the Project related to air quality,energy,greenhouse
gas emissions and climate change,and transportation.
As stated previously,the air quality standards/violations related to regional
operational emissions of NOx and ROG(Project and Cumulative level)is considered
significant and unavoidable with implementation of the Project. Because
Alternative 2 would result in 2.6 times more traffic volumes compared to the Project,
substantially more air emissions would be generated during operational activities.
The additional NOx and ROG emissions under Alternative 2 would result in a greater
significant and unavoidable impact to air quality compared to the Project.
Overall,Alternative 2 would result in greater environmental impacts as compared to
the Project. Further,this Alternative would not meet key Project objectives as no
residential development is proposed.Therefore,Alternative 2 would not fully achieve
all of the Project objectives,and would not achieve some Project objectives at all(for
example,provide high quality residential development to help fulfill the City's
regional housing needs). The City Council hereby finds that each of the reasons set
forth above is an independent ground for rejecting Alternative 2,and by itself,
independent of any other reason,justifies rejection of Alternative 2.
3. Alternative 3—Mixed Residential Development Alternative
a) Summary of Alternative
The Mixed Residential Development Alternative(Alternative 3)assumes that,similar
to the Project,the proposed General Plan Amendment(GPA)to update the land use
designation from Service Commercial(SC)to Specific Plan Implementation(SPI)
and the proposed Specific Plan Amendment(SPA)that would include a residential
overlay to Harveston Specific Plan on an 87.54-acre portion of Planning Area 12
3 87.54 acres X 43,560 square feet=3,813,242 square feet X 0.3=1,143,973 square feet of service commercial uses.
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 28 ESA/D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Ovemding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
would be adopted and implemented. However,the residential overlay would not
allow the future development of a maximum of 1,000 single-family residential units.
Instead,for Alternative 3,it is assumed the residential overlay would allow the future
development of a maximum of 570 single-family residential units(i.e.,detached and
attached)and 430 multi-family units(i.e.,apartments).
b) Reasons for Rejecting Alternative
The Mixed Residential Development Alternative(Alternative 3)would result in the
same impacts compared to the Project related to odors,biological resources,cultural
resources, land use and planning,groundborne vibration,and tribal cultural
resources. Alternative 3 would result in less impacts compared to the Project related
to air quality,energy,greenhouse gas emissions and climate change,noise,
population and housing,public services,recreation,transportation,and utilities and
service systems.The Mixed Residential Development Alternative would not result in
greater impacts when compared to the Project.
Air quality standards/violations related to regional operational emissions of NOx and
ROG(Project and cumulative level)is considered a significant and unavoidable
impact with the implementation of the Project.This Alternative would reduce the
regional operational NOx and ROG emissions;however,even with this reduction,as
well as the implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2,the Alternative
would still result in an exceedance of the South Coast Air Quality Management
District's daily significance threshold for NOx and ROG,emissions would remain
significant and unavoidable,and the Alternative's reduction in emissions is not
considered a substantial reduction.
Overall,this Alternative would result in less impacts compared to the Project;
however,this Alternative would not avoid or substantially lessen any of the
significant and unavoidable environmental effects of the Project.Alternative 3 could
achieve all Project objectives;however,the implementation of Alternative 3 would
eliminate the flexibility for home builders to respond to market conditions and the 57
percent to 43 percent housing mix of Alternative 3 may not be likely to be built.
Alternative 3 limits the number and type of units built with a maximum of 570
single-family residential units(i.e.,detached and attached)and a maximum of 430
multi-family units(i.e.,apartments). Although this housing mix was identified as an
alternative that could achieve the Project objectives,there is no market justification
or housing study that demonstrates that this specific housing mix will provide the
high-quality residential development consistent with the Project's objectives,and
information submitted to the City subsequent to the publication of the Draft EIR, and
contained in the record,suggests that it will not. Although Alternative 3 would result
in less impacts compared to the Project,this alternative is less likely to lead to any
housing if it cannot be built due to the elimination of the flexibility for home builders
to respond to market conditions. In that event,the alternative will not achieve the
critical objective of providing high-quality residential development that would help
Harveston GPAISPA—Planning Area 12 29 ESA I D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
fulfill the City's regional housing needs.The City Council hereby finds that each of
the reasons set forth above is an independent ground for rejecting Alternative 3,and
by itself,independent of any other reason,justifies rejection of Alternative 3.
4. Alternative 4—Alternative/Mixed Use Land Use Alternative
a) Summary of Alternative
The Alternative/Mixed Use Land Use Alternative(Alternative 4)assumes that the
current land use designation of Service Commercial(SC)would remain for the four
(4)parcels adjacent and nearest the 1-15(APNs 916400058, 916400042,916400052,
and 91600053).The existing acreages for APNs 916400058,916400042,916400052,
and 91600053 are approximately 4.81 acres, 10.21 acres, 5.36 acres,and 7.87 acres,
respectively.These four(4)parcels comprise of approximately 28.25 acres,or
approximately 32 percent of the Project Site. Applying the target floor area ratio of
0.3 for service commercial uses per Table 3.1, Detailed Land Use Summary,of the
approved Harveston Specific Plan,Alternative 4 would assume a proposed 369,1714
square feet of service commercial uses within the Project Site. It is assumed the
remaining parcels would include the General Plan Amendment(GPA)to update the
land use designation from Service Commercial(SC)to Specific Plan Implementation
(SPI). It is also assumed the remaining parcels would include the proposed Specific
Plan Amendment(SPA)which would include a residential overlay.The remaining
parcels comprise of approximately 59.29 acres,or approximately 68 percent of the
Project Site which would comprise of approximately 680 single-family residential
units(i.e.,detached and attached).
b) Reasons for Rejecting Alternative
The Alternative/Mixed Land Use Alternative(Alternative 4)would result in the same
impacts compared to the Project related to odors,biological resources,cultural
resources,energy, land use and planning,noise,and tribal cultural resources.
Alternative 4 would result in less impacts compared to the Project in regards to
population and housing,public services,recreation,and utilities and service systems.
The Alternative/Mixed Land Use Alternative would result in greater impacts
compared to the Project related to air quality,greenhouse gas emission and climate
change,and transportation.
Air quality standards/violations related to regional operational emissions of NOx and
ROG(Project and cumulative level)is significant and unavoidable with the
implementation of the Project.This Alternative would result in a greater significant
and unavoidable impact to air quality standards/violations related to regional
operational emissions of NOx and ROG(Project and cumulative level)as compared
to the Project.Overall,Alternative 4 would result in greater environmental impacts as
compared to the Project.The City Council hereby finds that each of the reasons set
4 28.25 acres X 43,560 square feet=1,230,570 square feet X 0.3=369,171 square feet of service commercial uses.
Harveston GPA/SPA-Planning Area 12 30 ESA/D181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overacting Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
forth above is an independent ground for rejecting Alternative 4,and by itself,
independent of any other reason,justifies rejection of Alternative 4.
C. Environmentally Superior Alternative
As required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6,one of the alternatives must be identified
as on Environmentally Superior Alternative.The Environmentally Superior Alternative is the
one that would result in the fewest or least significant impacts. If the Environmentally
Superior Alternative is the No Project Alternative,then an Environmentally Superior
Alternative must be selected from the remaining alternatives.
As discussed above,air quality standards/violations related to regional operational emissions
of NOx and ROG(Project and cumulative level)is considered significant and unavoidable
with the implementation of the Project.Alternative 3 would reduce the regional operational
NOx and ROG emissions;however,even with this reduction,as well as the implementation
of Mitigation Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2,Alternative 3 would still result in an exceedance of
the South Coast Air Quality Management District's daily significance threshold for NOx and
ROG,emissions would remain significant and unavoidable,and the decrease in emissions is
not considered to be substantial.This Alternative could meet the objectives established for
the Project. With the reduction of impacts, Alternative 3 is considered to be the
environmentally superior alternative but, for the reasons stated above, is hereby rejected by
the City Council.
VII. Statement of Overriding Considerations
The California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)requires the lead agency to balance the
benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether
to approve the project.The City of Temecula proposes to approve the Harveston GPA/SPA—
Planning Area 12 Project although significant and unavoidable impacts have been identified in
the EIR. Specifically,the significant and unavoidable project and cumulative impacts are
described below.
A. Significant and Unavoidable Impacts
1. Air Quality
Violation of Air Quality Standards—Operation(Project and Cumulative)
Operation of the Project would result in long-term regional emissions of ozone precursors
(NOx and ROG)associated with area sources,such as natural gas consumption,
landscaping,applications of architectural coatings,and consumer products,in addition to
operational mobile emissions.According to the Project's Traffic Study(refer to
Appendix I,of this Draft SEIR),development of the Project would result in an increase in
8,648 daily vehicle trips.
Harveston GPA/SPA—Planning Area 12 31 ESA/0181343
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Modeled operations emissions are presented in Table 3.1-8. As shown,the Project would
result in long-term regional emissions of NOx(79 lbs/day)and ROG(65 lbs/day)that
would exceed the SCAQMD's thresholds for NOx and ROG of 75 lbs/day. Therefore,
operational NOx and ROG emissions would have the potential to result in significant
regional impacts.
Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2 would reduce NOx and ROG emissions by
increasing energy efficiencies and reducing vehicle miles traveled. However,because the
Project does not have a specific design,nor the total number of units to be constructed is
known,the reductions that would be afforded by the implementation of Mitigation
Measure AQ-2 cannot be quantified. It is not possible,without specific Project data,to
identify which and to what extent the measures identified under Mitigation Measure AQ-
2 would be implemented.Therefore,while implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2
will result in reduced NOx and ROG emissions, it is not possible to determine if these
reductions will be sufficient to reduce emissions to below regulatory thresholds.
Therefore,with the implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2,which bans the
inclusion of fireplaces in the residential development,ROG and NOx emissions would be
reduced to 63 lbs/day and 64 lbs/day,respectively,but both emissions would continue to
exceed the SCAQMD regional significance threshold of 55 lbs/day and the impact would
be significant and unavoidable.
2. Project Benefits
The City of Temecula has balanced the Project's benefits against the Project's significant
and unavoidable impacts.The City of Temecula finds that each of the following benefits
supports the overriding of the significant impacts identified above and in the EIR.
• The Project will create a development compatible with and sensitive to the existing
land uses in the Project area. Specifically,the Project will allow for a transition area
between existing single family development to the east and the I-15 freeway and
commercial uses to the west,thereby ensuring a gradual shift in scale.
• The Project will provide the opportunity for high-quality residential development that
would help to fulfill the City's regional housing needs,including the City's Regional
Housing Needs Assessment(RHNA)requirement.
• The Project allows for residential development in an area that already includes
development,and thus the Project will help to reduce development pressure in rural
areas.
• The Project is located near an area with commercial,retail,and restaurant uses,and
thus will encourage reduction in vehicle miles traveled.
• The Project will promote the development of residential land uses that convey a high
quality visual image and character.
• The Project will provide high-quality residential architecture that will be
required/needed within the proposed residential overlay.
• The Project will provide flexibility for home builders to respond to market
conditions.
Harveston GPAISPA—Planning Area 12 32 ESA/D181343
Findings and Fads in Support of Findings and Statement of October 2020
Overriding Considerations
iR
07.
o �
N..le N
QQ
m w
H U R C
C.) c
W m
O a
a E
CI_ 0
N U a)
4- ID
W C O
O
CL
< fa
O u
z
z a
Z > To
a
a
a E
1
Q
El
Nrn C.) 113
c...71
C C >.
z U O 7 7 j
n Q'v E �U o o 0 cu a) 2
O cU T'E c >.E Y E 'o o_
_ i>u)U1- U1-rQ
0
W
a
V) m rn Ta
U_
O C ?">`
z< C O C m m 0 Q)
O= a) 7 7 0 a)
Q )O Q O CC 0 a).C- L_ CO
0 X� � 0 -- a) 7oa)
UH OHa) 00
z
a iiU U
J Z c Q >' >,a)
In
W w U H 0 H
Q 0
/- Z
O c
C H o
U
LLI> C a C ` i
CC O to O « N
Q c L ` C 0
I °a o�j
w 2 m U
= C N in
I- 0 O
Ce U a C-
O
LL N a)
g m L d a) . 0 -o O- N c L L.' c CC C C
N �Q
a) m w a C a' - > N ° o 22 O 2 U,.2 m to L 2 x m O 0 U N O m
c �oOcn7.oU�.O.N.� � n3 2 �n03n Od 0 � 7m a)
CC - n 0 U >.m U T 2 > >+C L 7 > N U E >,n O Z 7 L 0 N E m U
O. � oa)m 2�- m(73 � � NEoma oLoOam �� y CO yad a) � a
z C-'-' ° ca) naE ° nc� 00 > > m ° mc:) c - - fO
Z � cca � Uco � c� n To' §C� E 7oa) c ti
U O U R S C O N - ° aUj O 7m a) C C C L V)0 cn a) V) ° C
X 2 7 N V -0 U i c, `° CO u) s Lt C- CO O d O 8 N c CO - N - S -0 c-p
m W 7 7
C U c cn O- cn O`
aw o� °F ; 3ccm>aaU) 0 f8� o �2oE� � 0a `� .002 � 20
al 0
X �• „,a).o 3 a�i c -0 y c; ta E.N o 0 U_ 5 E o m � � Nc yL )>
Z0 E x E - m�L m a gn na c 0) o c 7 ° c mm o N o c0i E a�iL c - 3
Q O.a N- Q N H L in c m cn .0 - N a) a).- f6 7 2 a) a) m N
0 • Q�-c 0 a Q- fn o.ow a o a) N j L c-oU o m o aEi m m x o� • N o)
WZ 0,a) m 0 m-o co m ,_ m m e mo a)w u) oia c o a) _- Y.
C C.0 a)-0 N L cn- O 7 a) cn O l' a) C a'->0 m L c 7 N O O N) m_ C 7
0 - >.in m o"s 7 c aoi 3 >-,O E c" a) _ 0 L 0 ai L.o c c a) aa) 0 0 2 ri 7 o r
H • U a) U > U N co H N C.E L„ L °)>.3 H 7 L.y7.� Q) O)� >. o
co Z � 2Z c::,-0 � om0 0 >. How 0 En c d
c O N7.0 - 0 > m.fncrc°-0,cmoEE '6 -00 No.� o tm- ,_ om E0 � 0
r C7c � oomw� m.NQon c. 0o� > c00 a 0 5 6�a4= o� .oc
N8. 2 Q 0.�a w m o_ E U n L c c = E -0 E C 0 0 0 Q caj c U) ,0 N 0 o .- a) m E
a Z d m-L 0 O a) >`O ., m a n C 7 0 n 0 y 7 a) cn 0
n C 7 Q
co Q m m 0)c° O m U U O co N C C U L C 7 0 a) L r6 C co n co) O N O 7 m E a) L o 0) c
a O 0 0 c 3 -o m m 0 m c= c m o m o C m c �,
c • a) 0)c -C C 7 O w -C 7 m 10 o n m 0 m 7 a c m'� off �' a o.c �_ c m U 0 oar) a) m ti c cL a) 'c.c.E E.c m 2a 0 a) a) 0'-
O a> c U a) -O T 0:-U cn a)m a Q) m j "0 E 0 cn C C to I s
co - co.4rnac �acNca) mcrnNc E2_ �ocm oca) _ mEacn0 -oE.a) aw
c - m in S o o n a) O > m 0 o a 0 c. U_ ` U w a) E v) a) cn 0 E 7 -
c rn 0 co
o N N n� N mc n.La n._a o 2 ° om a)y 0)a) �� Zw-7.t., E S a) �-°o a a v
.2 :_. :_. Eoo > > - rn5 5a USao «_ n0ow
73 Q 2ommmaaa))Qaa)i3aa)) a)) �naa)) m°c 5.cccaoE >, E._H0 • • � g
a co
to;N
2 z To
c
to
E 7 O
la A O
g3 O
a o8
Co
c ....cN O
W
g o E
cL
cc c
v co
C
CO a.
co E
'c 0
° U y
o O co
C o
c O
0
m CO
p) U
w
a) Co
U, >
ca
C
a
CO C.) CO
C C C C >' p a)
Q U O. 7 O)
n E `- $ •0 CO C C
C = c H 7CO
U )C)ii>C (1)0
d rn
C T
(7 'C U
C O C Co CO
O!' co 7 7 N
cn O Q O a) O a)E C
OH OHOcO
c
d
E o Co ca
U a1 .._ U15 U
53
CO
°a _>E >.E ch
W O H O H
C
rn o
C
cn 0
2
. o
U N
Coa 2 0
2 N C.)o ELL'
O d
N C O O).-- ca U N O N a) c a N
c O r C 3 O a) C a) a) N
L " ca a) E 4)C C o m O a) C'- a) C m N a)
> uS m � , cEEn€ h .2 c") m �N2 > mac° N oN> o
a) C L7 O•a)Y L a) a) r E- - O ° 2 0 a) U ,n N,Corr N O c U• U
L > n C N- O L a) O = O m�a
m C U 03 E N 7 n c 7, V) N N al a) m w C c N m C >` g..E m r C n- o
L700 C _ ca crin°rnao � n Nv 'aa)-2m7 ° ca 3.coo0CU
w0na) rntioa) a) m � y� n > 7 a) oc� >� m > E -oEEmi-)L
E ° Ca a) N 4 O V C a`Nj L N.. E C coU m m N e L O O d-2 2-°
>L o N O O'o c7i) c ° co Ch a) -` N a N.N.n ° N N L. c coc
n_'
O.0 O 2 -0 n•- C F Z O.C a) O 5 T N m a) @ a)`•- CO O
Cit
n N a m ca <N "" C ° y 0 °)O N ` >>` CO CD O CO N �L a -O o 0 0 3 a)
p cD_ L Co. U O a) >c p)L c U'-Q > 7 Q) C a) n L C V Y`O
• C U,— N r•- N co C r cn _ N a)'-L
O C) _O C H O N r a a)" c a) O a).O a..- U C co E r ° C n
`i ca — O E oc4 c c o-oc -o� a) Emw
C N co L D N N O)N 0(Q O n N L o ` c Y,- N CO.N O cl r_ c N c m (O L C t
m 7 O)L 2 a`_) D cQ-�c� E 4) 0 c 7 C Co O.)o) O =)To 0) ca Q o,cn '- o
E .0 O H U U O C a7 C • 7 c > C c C aj r 7 r U CU a)o- w 0 C
Cr)O N O o r N N O y a)r 0 O >>. 7 r O N U Oin a r L n
m �co U ca) on> o aiS n- a, CNEa) nocC a) >,o ti
C m 0 _ co E n- C N a1 '7O > O «_>. O C O O cn r 2 m O N N C
a) c:� nC� ° E x.>_ mnrn2 C7 6Uo � 7cm €Ya °na)�ZC �
N 0 - 7 mQ_= O IE0co- < N y [o ?�ma) o)�tNa) N2�D - mE
o 'D U cVF r c O C Z ca co -0 N a) 0 d a o r L 0 E a) o as n' a) C u'
7 0 N C O a) O O 2,(a'Oc-.n c m 7 7 7 Co c U c 0 7 r �r 0 o N p,7 O c E
y C {y co > c u c a) fn w x N n O N C O N L r E C > H > U C 2 a7 @ O C C c
ca O a) c O aL E 2 C.o a_`n) c-0 ami m d af0i� N o� 0.5 0 rn� 5 � nnQo oa cc. t
�"`� g �m. 00ncn �mc mm 2c gyo'5 ECCom �Cmma� 7 ao
rn- c a a _ -a
C aT+ _C O c 7 °- a° C U c co , a3 C cn_S) cn c 6 `.2.O a) C H > O.N Q c
0 - a, a«. E U m o tico a ca o U O a CO a) 7-6 O a) N C a- a w
7 H >z-0 N >.cW6EOm °O m _2 � m2 �w ��6n24�.1) EEumwc
! co C7 Q�.S m 2 E QbQ.a) mOa oO �m °)7 o > o a°) c° �' oa o a`) m a Q
'L 'c_ n-3 5 Cl- o a)CC ctt, U CC « c O :... 0 7 ca c c N c O U n a) a). a)
Q • QE casaci) n�oy.S o 2 o_o E . o)Q ay m.0a 88Q.0 E 2-8 E2 un ax) oa
mN
m 2
S LL
0 0
A o
N
m
0 8
N
m w
E
U Ce
a)
c
co
a
E
0
U m
w
o co
c
0
co
U
w
O N
>
Cfl
E
rn0 E
c C C a)
o �.ai om
v n. 0 o)
Q v E coU
c o-c�
m o)
d c T
Cl).. U
c o C co
o a_ O 7 N 0
Q.C D) 0 - -
N O Q O m_ O
r ,N 7,o
U1-0m
c
m
E c> m
m c 7
U m C.)0 O) O a)C Q >,C.)
•
U w
C
O
C a) 7
O N
m N
-coa 0
U
dd
ti
O) m 17 "O N N O) Ihc,fl
U S] O En O)- E C_ a O V n
:� N O Y O O)�O r O N O`. 0 0 m m 7. j E O N m 3 m co E"O m 2 m
'� = C-O Q C CO m LL ifi 0 Cl.m m N co.> C co'Z OO C.O-0 c n To t 0 q 0.. 7 N N 7 N H
C E CO 0_m 7-0"O N E C L L C N.- 0 7 "O d E C 7 O N c fn N O N N C
0 D c C L O -' C U) O N L D• N > O N o O` f6 m 0 L L a t C m O 0 0
m co 0 0L.. m co C t L m N''' 0_C m N N O.n L ,� C y 0'� cC@p Cp �U O C
>`U O D1 m-' m.O m a m O)C T L D E 92-D Co m m U a m
cca oU�<n t.c .2= o E N c u-a c c m c 2 o m m C N o 0 oU a2 0.o.5 m m•5
T U m
- O C E 7 N.N > m a m O C O 7 L O)O a a O)E m C C C 0 T Y Cp o O^ N U Of
r a td O C m L L O Y m en O V.�U .D m N 7 N C O- p_O.0 U C C U V ,- �5C O
CO o m a) _ac r� E _ mo aLL LL o) r o ca c a3 m O)N no Qm m o m� Z c
N a O 0 m O L o O N'C O p c 'e L = C .0 E c O L'O N C a N> n•0 0.N N 0 p
YO 2� y O.N. N >,> m U U O 7 N m',CI)w - 7- E00.>H m N m. O a a N T O U
N' 0 UUfD N U t_ n> m-0 x a3.> 7 N (!)S O co'C O U O N L_ m 7 m 0 OU O N N CO 1] U NCT) L
o .co 0 N N C)-s>> 77.N .ui N m U c O a c.0 L .0 > O C co m m N�C 0 o m a 0 m O VU) m-0 a C v
C a C o.3 Q >,-Of a) 0 „0 u m N w `p o-EL
o o N co L N c U `4 a)j N E U (,) o U n C o)c cco n
C U N U p E O U O O m C m- m co C m L 0 0 7 0)U O7 O) m C m a) r
.E O)> C N >>> dm N0N EO co m 00.c •- O m> nNN-0 c = OO ' 2
O _O a Q 7 D m e 7 m T'e 5 .=.LL _ L m U m o > L c0 L) ti
ot. N a m m Y..-cc m O 7 co u_ U p L N is 0 0 L m 7 >0 m C 7 C U T �a
u, d a, m mL c N �r Z N cp coo o f -0.o air E c cep 0 o op N� m o § v) m v E
m `o S'm c a o) > r o U m _ p m E a
v R N m m S r c 3 O Q iii 0c co a L 3 tc9 N O E L ; >. a o N N 0 m m N L N U N.> m N rn A
m N O• O U m o m > O m C Z m m r qq
C m m 0 a 0 N-0 T 1 O O 3 U C U m 7 7 0)O U U y .O N m r .0 m C Z W E
N
c E CL g L 13 c: a 0 0 co.V L C C O Q m CrQ a ^ C C n@.0 U m p o a d N c a c N 7 d o
P. c m cCoom" m Q-0 - off)- ,•c / QN,,-L0 orC0)) om0. o cm.o00 o o0o ac
c0 o U O m'D @ U N N C m y c 0 cD 2 0 N 7 N m a E L m •C Q. O U O O)ca>@ U>D U a w
2 l0 .ia T 8O Cn N'O c0 m pvw 7 c C 0 y C F- U C ra N-8 N a) .; E ; EO 7 7- N 7 > `> N a a)
o a) °S ON N m co- 3-0 ° - c co m o 0_7 O m-c 0.5 Q E m E o 0-o a mrc c N cw c0 0� m cal m
o O ,_ m o N o . m E o 0 0 0 0 N 0 p 0 p 0 p c
co 2 m m •Sc� a.co NLL L aaa E.Cm.0 . . E U U CO c)0 om o0 o P.
N
L c
co
N S LL
E r) o
m A o
N
C
2 d
CI CoO o
F
CO y N 0
C W
Q f) CC
c
C m
c
C) E
c O
° 0 d
co O m
2 c 0
o 0
m
°) UE. _
C) _N
N >
10
C
m
CD _ € E - c c m
c c
c-• pa pd 0 CO•SL
U n. 3 O) 0 o) N U _ N
C C C C U
7 d
Q C O 7 C5 7CO C >.E C L L
U V)0 �r >UH ° 5f-
N
°' rn m >
a C >.
N iN N c (O
C '0 C 0) m 0) m -0 CO
0.- C) j p O -0 O 0-O O U a)
O.C CO U U O U.� O U O O a) N
N 0< O a)w C) O C)' cu o a)7= a)d
> E > E >.E 0aa
UHUQ UHUQ C)HO< mHCC
c
a)
E u m co co
a) c 7 7 7
U a) U U 0
0 O) O a) O a) O C)
ca U .-. a) Ta) CO
W U H U H U H
c C 'a-
O 0 0
C 0 0 U
O07 7 O C
N
+' m N N N U
L
O a 00 0 0 2
0 U U u)
0
a d dU
C N U
C
C U) a) 0
ssS Op C aC CO m _ L
jSS � CTmC NN > c C CO _
I-
CU 0 U
@,t> C'e a)
Ca)'OC •CNN CECU UUO aUCO _ ..C C.) C)
- _
� D Z
aicom
a)
L N a) y S C N.'-• N p C) N O)in
N .-.▪ C)W O O p3NOL.CONHO)Oa0ON > > w > O N C C C O O a..-. NNCC) m 0'._. L O
C O Y N'O CO ONO C O c C C O C C 0'O Nr _ 7 L c0 - E N 7 O y m'T C am 0)8 @ N a) Cpp O >
F` L ON o).N a E a c 7N U O C E N 7 d O 7 L m r(L C U L
3 N ca=L - N C Cr)y N O.� 'O O .>. N m N C) p co O a) N a) O C a) N N SS a)
a L , O N L C O 0 0.0 C) m o)2 7) C)) O 0 0 c a a N U CO 2 > c0 a)d cO c y
j C 0 0 N ca • N_ CO a) U'� C p L 0 L-. C E C c L E m L cO LO. a) O O N
O 7
a 0 a)-0 C 0 co) C-0` Cu) 0 E o U U O O N 7.-U 0 > 3 co 7 m c° a - 0 C h o
C m m 0)co U >L N C a) p C N
0 C O N N_a, .-C O.c j Q) p) >'-0 O 0 C N `0 ,' .0 CO w_ 7 N CO a co 7 N N N >
L O O C 7 0' .N O` a) �„_. o m V- E O L N C m C)�.m U N a) m m a) O j 0 m
Q) L Q) 0 0) 0 O o•
c YO (O p)O L c U U 01 '6.° 0-0 01 E a) UL. N d U E
.c^ co C) m L-. 0 c 7 COO N - c N 0 0-E.0 N-0 7 0 c N O 4) pNj O E N- 0 C 3
>.ato c) Ea) � � 0_ - 00N � aY�LE � �� �mL >LyCHgZa.0 a0i C
••oon
O E V O c d O U N N .. T L C 7 N • M '_. m C 0 7_O a) aai
7 o N .S•a J YO ca O.C N J N N N O U C-. 0 J 0 m CO T C L L O H a a!
N O a N D N 65 a)' N D a) O) D c a C o O O a) u
W �a,v)� m U p- L'-0 ate) `�) co
U 2 C Ti) 0 L p N'C m 0 ��.� 73 0 E c N c° �c d a
aC c 0 C N 7 CO y-C�a 0)0 > C. a)a a) c 7 0 o fO 5 O c `p 7-= cC`O O O O C)U CO Q E
O U a):N N 0 a) L C-o O Q D U CO D O N L C a) c0 C L O-0' (6 U
7 0 a- c0 U ` 7 o N' C a X 7_c N N N N co N (O d 0 E L N 7 Cr)m". co O p " m E
A a_a)) 0 `-oaa)) Ec 0 caicum a)^ mL0a`)_ n` c� m food-0 �UOL0EY- E ?
swU-2aNb EL 0 o `oEUNm`n m. 7am-0mc8cao) mN- CLO.. °)w ; oL0 ._, N
O �Loa >� m � aQy0cao)0D 3m00),OQOc EOSo � 50U5Ea) cf° a s
O U'O N L U C N - O a N O(O CC o 0 CO aC) N U O E ca N@ cp'ca N Of N-0 L O O C m S a w
♦+ 7 C E >. O >.� as _ co O U m W O L _ m C ` O• a Q) L c a. c d O o c CSc. cY C > - C O N -
Cn y C E ca N E O ] 7 U Q)�To m a) m U0 7 N m a)o.O C) O O1 V O. O co 7 N.�O N O a
O O-§C 7 n d U = .- O U 7 o U O O i+ to 7 0 0 0 N E > U a.. O O N O > 0 7 0 Q) U) 0 0 c 2
0 o)o.N N Q m m U 2 as o0c� co �= 2 co 0U co a'6 onmla 2•SL Ea N a) 00-0L..a a E a n
Cl)
TO
S tr.
co o
Arli R
0 0
N - u
Y a O
CO w
o E
U CL
a)
c
co
a
E
0
U
0co
0 0
c
0
co
U
V=
m N
O
o
m >. co >. co
C �C Lc C c C LC 'c c 0
O ,- 0 CO.O L 0_ _c .O L
U a •N U O U
U COO U"' O O U'-' 0
Q C O O m N d m 4 O m N d m
_ 'c >.E c. _o c >,E c. 0
U a.) a) o 3H >UF- 0 sH
N N
O7 o) > co >
a
C T .N C (6 N C rol
N 0 U
C 0 C co CO_c c O c
O . Cr) 0 O-0 0 o m 10 0 0 0 U)
a C O O m en0O O enm
N O Q O o L d O o 0 W
a)2 E m `aa a >,E co `ala a
0FCe --OQ c -a 0U -OQ alH0
c
0
E 0 m cc
► m c > >
U m 0 0
p O) 0 a) 0 m
c _ Lo
Q >.E > E
cu
W U F- O H.
L
c c
0) o 0
C c C TS
c c
O o
•C O C U c `
L
o d O 2 O
2 U u U Ti)
C
N O N O
a.0 aU
U • a N
O (o N N N co — ccoo ca H m m L 3-
-c �
c_ O7 7 L.0 N w O -c— U C '- N C c c c0 c0 t 7
C N O N 0 Crm m r m O)N O O o C)m— O
c— `-O L 0 N m•a)) m en a 'Q O TO N.0 m ua E N p N" �L-•.0 c 3 U=L O U
L C N E C am.. c O N' c 0 7-6 Q L o C N m N cO U m Z'
0E`oa) m o f> 0mo Zen co00Hm �a��i0 oo> U � ��� � g� mo�U
0 0 a).c~ N cp U O cn N U 7 > a a.>> N-- N O U E c a C 0 0 (O co
U 0 L L E _>, 'Cl.) C a d fO U ' '�N O Q-E O C Z U_p O-UO S] N O.O T Y m a U
O cu O ,- C a5)2) "O n- C 7 C U �_To�d a
N a) m'O U U L co O~ m co m a m m c 0— c a C L 0 Q F-L N O— N.—_ O) N
m -a D a) N_ C m co E U L c O w— m O O O.ry T� co U € '§ Q j F
L O)_ a) N co _ _
j> m 2 00 co L — Q)C O N > U a)O co N C.@ L O 7 C c U c N co- C N o
U N > o § 1/2 C O ,__co N V @ E a)@ 0 7 cO C a) o l] m p a) L o.c _ m m m 3 �
m 0 c .c > 'C U a)�c Uy.o , o p' E m E - 0 o)`) .C- C .- C.) N c C 0 C 0 n0)00
m 0 N•r m C >L E c 0 N a) N.2 L a) 0 7 L (o T O O L_ a) a 0 co-c 0 V U
R c L c D a) _c a co 0) N m coM co L w N H U o n Q U L (O c-,-_ 0.� ] o m 0
O� 2 �N YO C TO N L O L o U N y p)0 O - .O-6 O L�._ O)e� c 0 0.5
_�' m c •m N a) o�c N- CO o =.c m o� vim c c�� c E O E E C C c
Cr' C Ur m o ip > N co O N o O y f/_) O (O N O.N a)WO �LL)a E U O 'C.N �.
o mo N _ UJ a)a ag m
C J m ] > C J N o)o.N U.0 U N O 7 N — O7 N o.O•,_,,- V co co N ry C
s o oEo-o a) �� >oaLc mmama— Um ai_ c coc To dEco
o N 0 d m,N N U m N U O co co, a L C L N O N (6 U L m m U N m a
R d N m 0 n a m m c o 7' N - 'C co O'C.c N L Q U N N U N 0 c m E `� E
m N N 0 m ._ IS/ O a) N W U a) c_ m�` N O L co Q O L O co In O C m N O. O)Y O Q
cn
N N N a) CO N O N L K N O L L O N C L ` cNO N pc O•C a� 0'. U m cm.-- c`L L O C
co J O-0 — N X I- R 0 E 0 E a •.-.H a co L O a ry m m w L c o co N•5 C C �'
•- C m o m co 3 (O co m co m a lc co U ZS O N O a) c E CO L> O c 7 0 m
o 2 m 2 mU y 5 c m 2 0 8 o o mt c 0 Z o)a`o.c c o o>•N> a a .) c c o o a.N c a o
c Q' c m C c N m U -- 0 a) C O N co 0 •9'Z.0 fo c
.0 0 o N(a o D.(O co O c o!- o) 3 L N L N-0 N a) E a o m m N U L N a _N C c' a w
R o ]`c U a) o U o m 0-(o C U. O O.(O m 7 j O N O 0 � a N c
2 O Y 0 0 7 coy 0 m m (O E 0 O)a 7 a 0 2 U 2 o O X 7 S. n)L >0 m c N L 2 N L y T 2 e3
c m D) ) N d QI O, �,N co d E w a.d.c n n U a)L U d U V' O.N F- n F- U V
4 3 m� cmom }" a) mm ON
00 U E ci.m 0 am= 2 co) m_o�t a) • • • o n
N
z c
o _
� = LL
E v N
C
a og
,• oa
°° C w$
8. E w
cco
ce
c
45
a p,
01
o C
U m
co
o 0
c
o o
a �
a) t>
a_ w
m
6 > co
to
a
c
co to
C C C .0 C CO RI C C CO N
O�' - 0 CO• U O r..CO CO•-.0
co
U • U
a C Cw O a) 7a `8 o a) 7Q.
U N.-N CO.c C •N.-a)) Co C
>UI-- o sF- >UF- U sF-
In N
2 O7 CO �) CO >
C_
T
a
pCp O C co •O)L C co co.• , C
a C O] 0 O a) Cl) U� O N N
O OCD 2 Q O o=L a c0 E O O!=L a fO L
CL
re N7 �c Cd y7uCCa)
UF-O< a)F-CC OF-O< col-a
c
m
E u co co
roc > 3
` 0c) C.)0 c„, O 0) O N
C a N N to
W UF- 0E-
= 0
C) U
0 A O N 2
L U C C
o a 2 0 0
H U
0 0
Ua a
rn o c
C y� _a c m Lo. a) a)
co f` N C.c .L.. f0 O co L=•L-' y C C O.L.. C L C
in 7 C 0 L_ 7 a)N o Epp O' C c L_ O 2 O)y Cl)
0 7 332 CD.$ g• .c Cl'L N ac) m °�y 0 E E c L. co s o E 0 m 7
O N`-'N .= Cl) co a) O LUU o C O 0 O U L C 7.LO. C y L O
1 L O•N E C O'E'O O N y 0 C - as fo C co 6 6 O)L 7 O U 01 O co
'C F- a E N•�-) O C'y n 73 N a C'U N w C C C O O C L O CO CO
• 3 7 - d n Q. aci a) cn
a) m c= c L opoc 8 E O' r'n a.�~ am E rE �ii o_ c cd.�tj
L O O-----c a) L fO Nv.0 d Y N T 0 7 0 . O N.. C p'O) O N tS
m y " 0= o E `n rn6� In'§o a)-`°o €0 c (3�= u� o Jc �.c E 0 co
o
N a)� _;. QNF- o c a) m a`,c `o nr�) �o o y to C a�i E. - no rn
cno-. ). 'n'� . co 37YC oEn� mc)onc-oin.al m0)Na) n .0m�
rn a co Uy �Yo: '� m w
7 m > y D O)C O v. C.0 N c N N o O NO��pp C O7 0 Cl) U N (O L,,,eo O (OU� C
y C Q T 1O C C:O.a.) y y a N<d« y ,H G 07 Cl 0 2 a N Y C f6 03 N
E 0 0 E L `C a) L C C O V c C 6 E 7 y C O O.0 co-a N
O fn E r0 H. 7_O.c F- y y L C a)-o co'C y O L 'O c 2 L C
c a) c W. > p a w C 7 �Y NF-- y ��e N8.
7.0 r N 'O l0- �-) N ° A E- 0.43 N Oo, O fn V N L O V U o
800 V 7 n L •
N V U 0 0 o V~y $O.j F- CJ N- O p C N C) U /e)L n O
N 'p > N C E a .77. N«0:N N C �+ O N E y C n o 3 O c. a o c o L E
m N O,.- O CC O n O.0 a � O C O E cq O O C y O C O N fo U V '.N y C 0 y C
> > N0.7 c '--� o u 7 ° e a) w E o m N L o E a) N >.e�)o aaj O mQ E
a m N E - {o 7 a)I-t n-:. c c a) o- 0 E
co y C f70 LN j 0..Oc o m�p fo a y u0) = aU) L 2 -2.5 o.fa p .13 c ao) 7 0 c'c 7 W
r f � ,on.Em'� 2inEE1- aa)) f o� EO 2� m€�o;n �� OEEoo ,8 L �•�oto
C S>.y•s y D 0 p)p y co O: O a c U O N L O..-L O.y 0 0 p)U c'O O 0 j c a w
y O _ C) R aLONN ay1- N0' 0C'.e Cf0Um000r
N N C7 O�,•.- co CO y'0 O3 C U Tc C O O.N C a)
IN.'-' en C 7 7-L a) C E,C r CO N E O)7 a) c0 l0 CO O)L 7 c O'� O C O) D c >
T-'0 O 1p.c L 7 a U , O a f6 i;+ L�Cam- W U € a a.,m L c.
C 7 ... N L 7 , 0 7 N 7 > O U'C O a) N N N E O E O X E O o
f Q U me NLL mU Nn. U f o rno 2 mF- rn0� �vav�v Eli; nnm a)- c y
m
2 LL
ca 0
m
52
N
Y
0. - N
f0 w
m E
c..) ce
C
0.
E
0
U y
o co
C
O
co
U
w
m N
>
F.
co
01[m.)
C C C C 0 m
o m a) o coa U C.) Cl. U C CA
C
• 'El' E V O a) C
C O = _T E N co
U >UI- o0
m
.l] C E E
> O O)
N T. U
C O C CO _O CO O
CO O Q O m"- O 0 a)` O
m2 TED°) TE (o )
c m 7 (a - a) 7 o
0H.0a 0I-00_
C
m
E c) co co
�� m C 7 7
U m U0 CD U
0 CD
1 CQ Ta) Tm to
`E w 0 I- U I-
c C
O o
C U U
mA 2 O 2
0 f0 N U V)
C.coa oC 2 o
U y U
2 o d
aU a
a) c c
y L
a`) 0 o)o o.o n c O1_-0 c 0 c) o)n m Z
0 0 co _
E C o 5 m.O 7 T H a) O C) .T. - C t3 0 Y L a) y m Y0 c O co N N
Sp, co C ,- EO Z,-cn C 'V C'D.c O._ ON� a) � YO'2 .COS 0 a) co
c U 7 C m C N > o o c a m 3 o c o c U m w
7 a) O U y m co L N O O 3 m
o y� o � acioQa�ic°) NN En�aai� � N �_0-00000 - 00-6000) E 0D_, 0_
C a} 7 U E U Z E N 7 C L y N co O m jn C y a w.- > 0 N y C D-N N N Cn
a) N O cu.-
0 O N _ N O. o o N 7 0 2 y aH O Z L
• U"C a a) C L E a)co E a) f0-0 CO 0.0 O.O E 0 n O�. D (a N NO3 >L O CI Y C a) C
N0�ci._ a) 0 C m=� `) 0 D c niu o c o m 2 aa) o -CO o 00a a)-- - CI
E
O^ C m .• L..U 0 O L fa C c z co N C J m y L y _O a a U U m L y 7 C N U 3 CO m
E o > O) O.O N 7 0 3 0 N (a> `° y co.2 n U O m 0'U O-c) C (Np N a5 C a) -0 (a 2'O X-
a).-2 0 - N C N u)' y.a � N C LE: co m U-0 C C C C m O.N a) N C
m aa)r oL c ?QU o m - _ c”a' y•- 0)a) c aa) 3- yH a) a) n E c 0 coc co aa)) 'aoa c '
E�= calloE >2oco � oLim3oc.� o 0-05c°m �iEa ra-0o. D 0 COa3 EyU m
$ L o 7 co�.c '�r Z Z o o c E o a a O Q o ° �j cLi(n Y L� c c o m o 0 0 0
_ _ D N U a
a U7-74.ccao_ mrcEm amyI ;aL mE o0@ Tio on o r'c om o
co C `° EO Gf 'd CO y U .L. N CO N.0 N 0)'m N O n O Q E U K
'C -) -V--0 ce U U C J a N 3 O)'N— C a= z,c o U N `o — m m > II
o w8cE o allo.c N (v 7 0
co N N L C y cD 0 D m0 E O(O N `a m O y - m U m C m (a N a�L o --: U Q cD c aS
m O m a7 @ C O C N y L_ C C C d L'O a) y 2 a7 p_ o > m 0'O (Ca N a 0 7_ N .> Co a1 y NO y W e
c N a) L C (a L L L O O U N y N C i� n' E a) a7 C N_ U a N ; > U .N J a. o
O m = 7 O L 3 O)a O a) O c a) a)-O Q1 C m O fa C y C m O) I
C rt C C N m-_ a) m C a) O m > O c — E O Q E = O O Q)N o o oc c
N a) U 7 0 c -o - U c m (a a a) m m O a o O O (a D-O m iq._ C y a3 7 Cn O (a (a N y,C N Y N L-0 O a) U j m.0 CO L C `O-0 E w
M is m is E c°cn D'm E o Zs 0 `)U co C a c ca c 2 L E 7 o C Ca c Z rn Q Z a D o 7 c-o 7 ,
o rn ? °rnmrN� EN� ccpoa _� >- fir caarna = a Cr)-o — m.00r Noc ? oa0wiy 'o - E 0S
a, 2 U C.).,2 o-0 8lp c.c E co n> E c o cca-0 H c E .Soa co .0.c °m 2a CO 00 o a
N CO
W WI
W
co C
331 1 LL
E 0 N
co
N
m
e o 0V)
co
c Y c O
f E W
S a) E
cc c
v ca
C
m a
co E
c o
° 0 a)
o o co
c 0
c 0
co
co U
w
d N
47
0)U - C
C C C C C O a) -''O C
o 0 0 co 0 co Q)a. 7—•E E a)
U aio 7 (0 7 U 0) (n co 7 a E
aco cz.E c >,E D- 0aE > n
—U a)._ a) a)._ a) co5 o a 0 a) a)
>U1- >UH NCo ZQUaa
d
a 12) h 3 5 - o c
V)'O U
Ta) C.cn
cocCO ° o ° co 8 a) m , E . 7,
p .moo Sao D0o o) a) 7QEo
a C DC c)- c 0,_c 0 c a`) c 0 E o tO
In 0< o a)_ o o a)_ o o a)—L 0) o a) N co
02 >.E m a) Z.E °-) � E— o rn E E > a
o -. co H8 �
CJH0a UH0 UHo0 CJ00 0
c
a)
am E c) co co co
m c > > >
U a) 0 0 0
0) O a) O a) 0 a)
C Q �—�' a) •• a) T a) LL)
w UH a U1—
c c
o 0
C ° D C C C
O N t_ O 2 O O
..'' 10 C UU U
-c0 Cl- o 2 o 2 2
U cn 0 cn n
C C C
N O N O O
a_U a_U U
cn a) a) a) C °) m °
•-. N C 0) O C a) (o T C 7 > Y Y fo a)
c0 _ C C >` L U L H N V) O O co m 0 >
U L Cli a) 0 co V N a) co C @ N C o 7 0 C C °,
O y C U p a)L
co U N ` N o L U..- U y O U -o O O a) t U C C N— L n E U
O) (p O— 2 i -0 0)U C U - O in 7 7 p (o y ° co
C S U O °)p U a f0 N O L a) p— _ M C p E O p N U'0 L L O arc')
H C
> .rn-..0 3,C V) C L C.N r co O co a^U N a),N V) fo C N a) V)= C a)
O C C c 0 V) N.- N a C L C '0 N— - a) a) Oco) a) - Q)_0 C._ >- O a)
Ea) 0co_ o3-- da) c_) 0N7a) > m � a� cE0— � m3a� >�
.0 E d._ (O C a c C 'C Q) -0 ° a 0)cO CCD N O O ,,p 0 U co >
c 00o• n.� o-oc jw70 co Vc— , 0`— cn 92o ° coc0o °a 0
O N) C in H O a7 O Ln N O N 7 Co o.D LO-. Cr* .0 .� o .>L N co-o,N _c V)
O a) 0 0 O L 0 0 C U a O C O L O N 0- N C a)—H to ° C .) c Z E--8
:�° w (1) 9 Div 6C0)C c C-C .— a_a))a)) a0E E uc� „ 0 ,c. oycocona
nc c — a) x a) 3 Qa7 omma) °� n on.yoaaitim a) p_m Mo 3 to.c a).N > N.3a).N N 0 _c > 77 n 3
cta o)i) >.n� co 2 c o °� °o o' � �o f° La_) 0 o o 5 °c Ct cn
O C 0 7 ° >m cn 7 o a)'E C 7 2 0 @` 0 0 V) O L O C'p r 0 o r 0 O N
Lac ' aa'i a•) o 0•- ,- c o c C '"' a_ c 5 a) 0 a c obi � E. °
do00c �o0- a) 2 or D — � 0 sa)C DC oN3 oMa) m ) 0Cr) > ,na2c =
C -o= 0 _ 0) Q w N V) a7 '-' L > 0 L- ° U C o-0 O�N O N � C '" ° ° _° O
D C N N C E 0 C V) 0 C U fn a N U C } .0 > L •O to.2° co > V1 `- y
0 J p N N 11/ = N a),-p _01 J a).0 a) 0 0 '- U `O Ccl) O a) C > a) .p`co O L T( - r
CO U °�) N c a a) j�YUU CO O U o°.�� N`a) Z � aL -�a rc E 0 0 0 > m 1 .
d d a, p —0 0 2 o>> o y C C 0 C �j co - C d co 3 co J p O U a) O_ Q E
7 U 7-p O O a) O U N O o ° 7 0 'n c O a7 a) (d 7 N-0 0 co > U O >�« C 7"0 _ rn-1
N cn p p ,_ - C V) ,_ a 0 a 0 co a) ,_ C)a)L 7 a5 0 O N C J U a) co ° C fo a E 7 U E c
M 0 N V).0 C cp CD 7 a a) a (o a'—L N N M a_ C 3.O w °L O a) 7« N V) a) C t
N co
V) N ° O a) U E ° U L'C ° cD a O L` N@ N a) co O fo Z V) U -O O Q O.N a c
� a U L � > — a) 26 7 mvi C) CA _ Q
C 1 C 0 D Q O- o 1;2o o O U) O ,- c ° N cn L o E 0) C 2 Cl,N o" 0 0 € p-0 CCD L °-0 c Q
O ° a U D O.0 a).a o-0 a) O Z'--'O p 0).0 0 o co U =m I N U C C co w
O) 0 „N_a,a) CO -0.V CO p y N 3 0 > O-0 N o •.O ® a O U C M-0 T L N co C Q,U O N d aci
U N 7 7 CO E C m Of OU C 7 a) O C N •- C.° cn c° U «'N a N E O E <o.- U' a
~ w ° C o a) U O C N O a — . coo—V) co a° ° ° E N O fo m co ° N a)L
U -c c) 0-n E 8 7 a.E.E .8 a) f E rn ca a°) E z 2 U a 2 c o n 4' 3 nin 13 L H N > o n
m (1)
m c
1 o)o
AR
of
to
Y < 0
ca tO
E La
a) a)
U Q.
C
at
.a
E
0
U a)
w is
O 0
C
0
ra
U
a) N
> N
C
a)U _ C _ C
C C 0 -0T>'�a) C 0 T>'T N C
O'7.� °d � E 0 °n �� E 0
u) ° 7 nE
qua c� rnl0 > 7ocm CO cc > o
Qco m� NnE > n 7- NnE > ma
-0 u) 7 0 a o a) a) u! 7 ° n O a) 0
Nm Z<000 Nm Z<U00
a) To a)
a) U O a) U O.15 0
cC 0 >.0)C.CO >,0 C o)
`o c caO 0 co E E a) m mO 0 a)E E a) N
0.._' O 70) 0 770-Eo 7o) a) � 7aE0
aca) 0c0) c o or0 UcCDC U or0
m o< o a) -L o) 0 0 E - 0 0 - L 0) 0 a) E-
o ,Ea ° c7i >,2E >) aa) � �E� o6 SEE > no
UFm o0 O1-000 o OHm o0 (Ul-000 o
c
a) T
E o co co
0 c > >
U 0 U U
Q) 0 a) O a) O
�Q E >.E
W UH UH Lc!,
a)
c c c
o N O O
N
•ca U U
>
0
iii
2 to
c c
0 0
O 0
.O 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 D T T T
T U7 C 7 N Y L E ,n V)to c 7 _0) ›-c.) C o N
0 U r� 4- O u) N 0 L U O= 2 O ca 10 C 2 N u, a7 0 T
> a) 0 a) 0 N a) C N a,co C V) * C L C O m a) > 0
° aUu)-O 70UocE — a) >'aNLr� moo . 3YmEa)()
c o C 6 C o ° a)�o - co c 7 c U m E y a)
aa) cmN� 333E HL - 3a) c §~ mN �
O -0@ U a « N Y o)(a .0 N U"00 N Q to n 0 NL..
U u)t C L co.0 u) a)-00.O O >-0 co C.0 a) C N L 'C V)LL >^L' C.0 a) to
0 0 E H CO 7 CO u)"0 0 la > > �CF`- co > L a (a pl 7 y D , a) d U 7 L .L-.
(/)' N C N 00 C° OU O O 0 L 0 Q 0 L V- 0 c ' O U O `) cn,z a) C a)
0 a.) N o 0 L u)= C• 0 L D1 E0 a7 0 C•
co 0 U 0 co a) u)-C(/)U CC o)0 a7'-
Onc000cr) M C -��`o~ ac) vmCI 0cHco0NQ)) EO�N > o
4--
0,o) C c6-0LL} a- T- O0 c3L03 co CO ll0 0� ° coo
o a c., .> co co 3 o co 3 000 0 c_0 .---
o ')' CO x= ccn a) °ocn m 0- - 7 a)
_ E U L
r- 5.4o0 ti tiwa) U > .aa) E)d0 7N t >U00o
Nc L 7 ca co.c*-E co t 12 on 0 t L 0 0 E O 0 co-,'C.N L..`O.) C L_c o)H C
gn m c > o� o`a� a�Zm- `- (nja) E)j > o- oo `no � m� c n
L a 7 C 0 °
a).- to la} N o co O O CN N N CO n c 0 •L o)N U 0 `O 0 O ° 0 0 0 j Y a
LL L C 7 L C o 0
COC O a) N U N'0. 0 co a7 U U c `�,'- co 7 m 0 >
C } nLm 0mL0c°noONa Oc.�� ca 0m� of0-S Uca d
'� • 1) O'r'= L c U N E)2 c d L C S C 0 L Ncc
NccOco 0 - 3t2mc ri 0 - 0)
O L C C «'_. 0 C 0 LL 7 O L c (a .n N a) N 0 0 L-. V) m
a) I CO a) a)o „r E ru E E� u) Z ,na'ia a„)N 2as E ) C °2 o f= P m a
ce d m y�w u) 00" omJ o� o y c m�0o no-- ° co n-Z ca ,a rnm
C > .o w
W 0 0 0 a n 7-° U 0 c0 O a.) S"c V) > 0 0 Y 0 7 io U a) N O 0 U co co -N ro q c+
co 0 a) -_N aS J u°)L o 0 „ 0 c a) N m O@ a)-) u°)L O 0 $� C 0 O 0 C V)
C '� O la C 0) N 0 -L>> 0 co 0 a) 0 0 a) co 0 u) 0 -°Y 0) C 0
«O C L L O ,O N u) O> L..C >._c x a) 0 0 O )O co Vi O u O,0 C 0 0 d O
c 0 0 O.cc m .2 W a O co a 1c 0 °'c o u)cu O_ o co co'.o W a O 0 a>.C cO E E N c a w
m 0 ma Z aI) 70 >,°7en� ° � C '- E '.� N '0_ caZ T9� N NL O� a) O m
C a) N m 0_ c Y 7 u) a 0 L a a)U CO N.'n '> ° C Y 7 N n 3 U'C 0 N'C 0.
g :. c o �< O m o E) - 0 E 7 a) 0 a) O a)a)< c)m O-� a`) a)-o > 0 0 ci $
t o m n o m 6 co O L O N L C_ a)....m a7 0 0 ca C r( C 0 L 0) c a
2 Z 2_i co 0 m -o.o 3 a cn a U. 2} n.� ca-o_0 w 3 a d - 0 co 0 cu g cn
N C
,n 2 Li_
E " o
e ('CO
Q1 m_
Q. N p o
co 'Y a O
c
c E ,A,
o
re c Ce
c
co
co .ti
co E
•c O
a U o
E
0 It
c 0
O
O
IT1 CO
0) U
F
o N To
E
a)c.) E c E c c
c C C co o -a D T o c p o -o D T a) C p o -p 0 T 0 C
o ._ a- 7_•E E N a 7_•C E N aa' _) E E N
� � m7nE jp) � a7nE Q o co N n E > n co N n E > n a 0 n E > n
-U (n 7 O n 0 a) O co j O n o 0 o Q) 7 O n o 0 0
Nm z<000 co z<000 Nm Z0000
0 iii a) o
Q1 •U p o U p o U p o
cC T T o C.a) >-,CO CO) TN C.m
o c m0 0 co.E E o u) coo o co E o N co o o E o 7)
a) 53nEo a Cl) > > nE0 i) rn o > > nEo
CL C o) 0 c 0) C U 0 t O U c a`) C 0 o O 0 c 0) C U E O t o
a 0< 0 00_C.0) 0 a) Ec m 0 a)6= rn o 0 Eo co 0 o:or 0) `0 a) Q ca
02 >.E- o ( z.E E > o_a) >.E- o v E E > na) E= o m E E > no
0 7 a) a) O a) o L a) 7 0 o O o a)L o 7 0 o O a) a)L
UF-m o0 C)F-000 o UF-m `00 0I-000 o Ut-co o0 01-000 o
c
0
E cT) co ca co
a) c 0 > 0
U a 0 0 _
p) O o O o O o
< >.E >E >.E
w U1- UH. U1
a)
c o c c c
0 y 0 O O
▪ A U U U
•
0
0a 2 2 2
c c c
0 0 0
C.) O U
e) o r co o 0 o m na Y
c O m j U O L .0 O N c T L O c m�`C.0 `O N
--
To n 0 c0 S_ O O D i9 n O (p .� >> z_:cA C C U O _U C U O 7-a
> L O .t-� E O L > L O _ CL, 7 a) C N~'O)a) E a)0
L 0 a) N a).0 N o o C L Vl CC a). N co L 0 € > O a) = C(n C« @ E 7 0
U ca 0 v) 0'a 3 N o~ = o CC Ua) 0 V) O c (C C) O.co U r0 0 co ns O N z
2 0 c V)f0 9 O co C o o c 3 C cn C 0 0)7 O C 0 o• J-0 5- Y 2 U o
ra
Li_ -_J 2 L..'c 00c00 L >.Vl•
a) LL - 7-I N L C coo D O C UO > a)a) • U co 2 3 a.co D
d) co L 0 7 U U 0 N > l� N O L_ 0 7 U T o N n p p O a) 7
N- o cn 0 a f0..E-)
co o 0 cn o.Q 3 a E N E ci CC CC J C to c CC L 0 0 cn
'' C J =00 Q.is = 00 C J N O_N 7 1- V) c w O W to o C o
a) p)N.2Z g%) a) as-Y o 00 > ,_a) mN.2Z� ;-).8 o m�m`o o� o c , o o)aEiL a)
a- a c O.0 o c� a_i T c o�- ,2- 7 c 0 a) c o C.5 0 0 al Ti a o m} o.�E o O m >o
m- p)Ea) o27U
7 oQ o N.E o maDr- c=i �Q o )n.E o m EUD L 7 cm o.N oy o� co a)
LD in- C C c 0 a N C/)'7 0 c D - 0)aa cn.O ca) n N Z N a) > 0 U C} cn c U T'E 7 2
C o co T> U 0 a)m�_ c C c[) (0 T>U N - a L w a) -Y V E E U c0 a)O '- a)L
L o.O,O(D cn 17 co L W '� •C U 0 L o •o cO-2 a)L W•O o D C 0 0 0 o 0 0 E C 2 W a)r a a c0
C 0 j C O CC 0 CO° Z a) o a) 7 O Si C O CO 6 m C`. C 7 (PO O N N_ 17 0 C N C L OC11- C
ca) oQo E c>o 0 cod oQ.`O_ Ea) c0 -0o5om o0ao)
cC) C 1;H ii co a)'0 o O CC E L C 7✓f-'O a) a)D O Dj a C c0 a) 0 a) 0 w a U. o 0�7 -D C
._ 7 co N a7.0 7 L o (o 0 7 ,_ 7 CO CO • N 0 �L pc... a) 0 0 a N } f0n a N 0•
m o. 'O7 m O > m
m.0�ymc0oin�Oyca U0� Cncoc35tna > cnU o200C .0: '(- corn ^ c
O«. o L o U ;,E C O o L N c0 o N-O L a•- N L_ 7 o o L
n - L C m.N N N CO V a) O N Z c 0 N 0 c0 N CO o C U p C 2 - 'Q Sg 3 D.�Np.N E _ v a
o. O o. o L O T O > -p O O E
d m p S O c ca 0"0 C.c-0 n 0 N d p"O O C 0 O lj C 'C O o c a L.O C o a, a Z O 7 rn_N
N 0 O E co o OC o 2 c0 D n - Ecoc0 0 - .O 0 O E o'c o 2 c0 D a E ~ rCoa) 0 O N - O 0 (0 U c0 cO o N co c F
g .i Ea mCa)coo090aic 2 coc rn`oocg • 0-0� N 26.__ - 2,u)wa)0E � a) 0. 2
c m e O C C w 0 a7 «) 6 �.c 'CO c a)c 0 C C w 0 N 41 0 0 7_>. c >Q a) n o C cn «"= a) 0.N ) 5
O cO) O C C 2 m.5 r c O -cif ca c `O Toc O =C 2 0•5 L c `O N Y y 0 0 0 co U" Q D Y N c d aa)) C a w
`) d "_ � �' > o, ou)C2E1 °' CO . > 2~ 0VSC0,UOL niQ) UCU > 0 c� o7p o a
O) N a) o �j• n a) cn O 4) O N'C O 7 o D a) o-0 N-o- C F-' o > o a
.loa L-Doo � E E7T • on r � oo E2E :. cocntca)Lcn 'C > V' a) 0
2 0 2cccooCCcooa0))0aEU.NU 2 ccoCCmoa0)0a-Hoc - 2Un- co cr°.� cco0L _ o
d 0
m
W E
= LL
o2
y
AL
F CO y
E w
ar o
c
as
.a
E
0
U o
o m
c (0
0
co
U
o y
1
To
rn coi E c E C
c .Ec oo a�YoC 'a 0.) a��oc
O ..0 a 3_ .— E a) 3_ E o
'u.ua °0 � v, ; ooE Cl-°8mu, ; 0oE
a c o D•a NaE > n 7 N a E > a
U ym Z0000 ym Z<000
0 rn Toa)U O U O
• c T Ta) �.m Ta) C,O)
C o C 00 o m' E a) Co m0 o r° E E a) c
Cl)• o > j 0.E o CT) a) > > o.E o
ac rn ucoC c) EOt° c) CmC 0EOt°
cn 0< O N--L o) o a) O N L O) O a)
og cc _TEDON _TEE > ao _TE� o'N _TEE > no
UHmo0UH000o UHmo0UH000o
C
0
E u co Co
r , o c > >
U 00 .- C-) . U
O o
�E 0 o al N
c a �E
W O H O H
E
co
C
0 a) C C
O u) O O
V U
ca
O 2 2
n )
C C
O O
U U
01
-C y co L O .CO O O—N o) 3 'D a) 'C
Q.) U O El U N C a) �.`-.o L C y U r0'N Q)
m o > o a�w '� � E ca —c .— c o cZ c
c o c o y 6 y c- coo y
o_a)L O. 7 - C O o O-T 3 a) ;'0 L 3'O a.-. (6 a) T
O L U Qn L if-)N O u) d y -� °.0 D C. 3 C 'n 0 .
O c6 U a) a) LL .0 d N � -o N .O l6 a) L... Q)
�_ S c v v�i.� c 0 o L CD> , ° o a) o o)CO 2 W C'E Q o
a) Co' a) a`) 0 y 0 L' — c n o-o O L 'D co
N- . C L i6 C O L > O N a) 0 O 03 N' 3 a) O L
a o .O- o o c mn0 )p 3 Cl) Cl) L ra E UC5 O_ Cl) E-0 a) N y
CD @ . y a) U o.N a) O C H C O V) a)
E •
c.- oa)Uc -ca) ooc aci Lo > mtny o >,-oc
30cc� cH En. ._ O-U.O0 LLmm �Laa�i59 C'ccN
w 3 O o W a)-m-C LO- N O > a LL O U.0 a) 0.6.O o O >
pe 0 c6(Z U O).- O C N D a) >,.-: O co C L 3 co E C N-6
L3 o L O N 0"0 C rn a)L 0— 7 a) N o O 0 O)oc 0 _ 3 a)
Ol m aa)) C Q o CD 0 m 7 o L 'al N (n ro a) N o c.0 L c O_o= a)
O Noo}COLLy�NO00c - > O. 3c _jCUIjom 0yE0 04 0) c
p) C 0 0 y to CO.3 O 5~ H O O U ct N o C~ N cu a) •_F 1_ Co 0.
C } .N C U - E t O € O a) O"O C J co.0 0 0 t O a)
cu
da
y Z 3 a) Yo O-o L.°_N� 0 0 a.�.o Z�JD.. �Z -0 C Q)o Q.�_co N n
CL o dN:?50 yc�a„ omU > o`-L DcUicvscs0OF c)U > E
co To
c N H N co O E y f° '_' L L 7 0 2 Q) y > a)�' O L@ c c
m L c q�Co r6 r0 L o O'� C 2 C 3— y r0 L-. R N a C r6 al U'o 3= cn c t
05 a) a) — u) N co o— >.co •C E a) 0 Q)co} U.-— a)0 m C a m
p C O L L co N O" C 3 O .y} L O C L a) N • 3 d
.0 C O c 5 y 5.O co'O O O.y C co C c C 0 0 0 .N O L L a) ow c < c
p o 0 O.0 C > c C) 3 co U - 2 o m c L 12 E.u) U C U O U m a W
.7. o N a m(� O C U cO a C C y N cr N O y N o 2 M r c N y c
C 07 y CP U O c cn.D C.O Q.-0 N O)N.cn'- 0'3.: N N— -0 a-0 N a
a i
Q ._ •'0 �_' N Q 0 N L--3 O 0 Z N y.5 .-. C o O a) m a) 04 o a— 3 a) cn.O c
a 2 Z L _1co0.S §_oanra02c 2}� n� u)� c) m §in02c ICI
E co
E°
�, m
a o $
N — t
ea
c _lcc0
flii, C (a w
a a) 0
ix C
co
c
m a
as E
c o
0 a)
o o co
C 0
c o
o
i Co
co U
w
•
N co
N
a)
C
rnU E > > E > > c €
cc c oU -0a �Uc oU -O��UC oU
o - Cl 7 E a Cl- 7 - E U d
m- 5 m c a p) m n E 5 0>
< C O 0- N O.E > C c77— N a E > Q. a-15
-
U N 7 O a 0 a) U N J O a O a) a) N 7
,2 co Z<000 Nc0 ZQUaa 0m
o Toa) a) Too a) 5 oO U oU U
N 'C c..) >,>,U CO TN C O)
C O C 00 U CO c E U N 00 U 3 c E U N ca0 a)
o a) c rn a) c 7 aE °) a U 7 aE U c rn a)
aC Cr) OCC)) c U Or0 0ca`) c 0 or0 O00) C
N O Q o U L O) o a) E— 0 a) — L CO 0 a) E— o a) —_cO)
CC >.N 7 0 a) . U O a) a)-ca.) - 0) a) O U a)L _ N 7 0 a)
UI-CO 00 aHC.)00 O OHm 00 0 H 0 0 0 O 0E-00 oO
C
U
E () (a co O
C
o U >
oU o >U >U
° O) U U o a)
M
Q _TE >,E >.E
us
W U- U H. O F
y
al
c 0 c c c
8N O O O
. O 0 U 0
C O d2 2 2
N to
to
-
c
C c
O O O
U O U
> <2 m o mQ- .o m 0
a)
To CO o C U >, U O C U >, Cl) L_
> U a)�a L•-• a� L'd U € N1aL- d�� It,-0 0
U C) v a) (a=C .•c m C a) v� a) m-(n c CO C CO
c o C.2 U ?i a) C 7 2 Cl.7 C L U 3 a) C 7@ d C
2."' O N N a) N LL co a) O O)U N U N Cr)
€ 2'2 �L'o o E m ° n c c� L o o f @ N
rUN .- a c° N cp
,na) 7mc nro- coC ccac a(OZcoC0 as
• O.cO @ U C) @ as a a) N - 7 0 C a U '0 co a a) N >
U ca
w a) N U) O) .m+ O O N O5
L a) CD N(/) U a) O U'D C -C
• C N W N N C U N )yJ N N U co
C (CC O C ca_
-V 0 C C N 2 C@ O L C C N C C co CO 0 C@ O L C C
• a1 p N a`p N N O c'O p L N a`OCO 0 N co N
L t o U U U'O al U 7 7 U' U O IDC a) @ (L/)
O aR O en C a O 0.0 C O o a) (n .N 5 C a O O C C O j a) 2' U
z C U U 3 N o._ N Y > U U 3 N p N a
O co 0.N c .T. C N _ •,— ,0 O` NO N C.T. C N_ CU O C
• N 0 U aE.OU 7 U O = aU a-E .20 m 7 a) a) c -ala a
- N > aa)) 2 N U a) CO E L L D . m a_>) ° N U w a E L_ } U N K
an U 2 L a N 2 .L. 2 EO o N ,- O N L a(0 2« 2 p O N D N u
N co
Z N n O 3 " N�p a0 C� Z • a) 3... N aO C H L € m a
2 d o O p 0'O U.•LU.. CO CO N'O CO a cO 0 0'C 0 Y L l°c4 a) U • n Q E
> U a) O 7 L
7 7 N N 7 U U N > > - N C 7 U U row co > N of m
N N 2 U 3 N C)N m U O w> N C O-U> O O)..L U co v N € E `
co N C O m C
ai ._ a10)LL , c L'O 7E �u dtcauc L� 7E c7)o o af0ia� m �
• C"- C `O FU- € U 0 2 U U C, .7 C `_H € U O 2 rn r d o
c c c o)aa_ �.0 o� O E c c a`) a�i�D �� o= U E c c.c m
O O) `p U U U T O))' U O `O N O U U U >.O)H U G '�.O-'O coo.
c
O)co N O)2 U-W cO@- UUa O U mNL -W mas co- UUa o a) C mL O a
..+ O .+ U p C Z 0(Y L U U 7.— (>O ~ O co co Z co L U U 7 -CO> CO Y N c n
E Z E. C a O 0 7 N N a)-co U L .z > U o 0 7 N tl) O L co U L F .0 r N a)
0 N
Z m
ip c
2 u