HomeMy WebLinkAbout12072021 PTS Agenda - Special MeetingIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City
to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II].
AGENDA
TEMECULA PUBLIC / TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 7, 2021 - 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Richardson
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Carter
ROLL CALL: Carter, Matics, Richardson, Sullivan
PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENT
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each
speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five
minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the
Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the Secretary .
Email comments must be submitted to PublicTrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca .gov. Email
comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item
is called for public comments. Email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise
govern in person public comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public Traffic Safety
Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action .
1.Approve Action Minutes of October 28, 2021
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes of
October 28, 2021.
Recommendation:
Action MinutesAttachments:
Page 1
Public / Traffic Safety Commission Agenda December 7, 2021
BUSINESS
2.Traffic Calming on Roripaugh Road - Stop Controls Analysis
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing
Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersection of Roripaugh Road and
Swallow Court.
2. Recommend staff implement striped pedestrian crosswalks at
intersection of Roripaugh Road and Swallow Court pending City Council
adoption of Multi-Way Stop Controls.
Recommendation:
Agenda Report
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Attachments:
3.Carleton Way Traffic Calming
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend staff implement
advanced warning signs and centerline striping at the knuckle
intersections of Carleton Way.
Recommendation:
Agenda Report
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Attachments:
4.Engineering and Traffic Survey Update
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend the City Council
adopt an Ordinance reaffirming and adjusting the speed limits identified
in the Summary of Recommended Speed Limits .
Recommendation:
Agenda Report
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachments:
DIVISION REPORTS (Receive and File)
5.California Highway Patrol Report
California Highway Patrol Report - October 2021Attachments:
6.Fire Chief's Report
Fire Chief's Report - October 2021Attachments:
Page 2
Public / Traffic Safety Commission Agenda December 7, 2021
7.Police Chief's Report
Police Chief's Report - October 2021Attachments:
8.Traffic Engineer's Report
Traffic Engineer's Report - September 2021
Traffic Engineer's Report - October 2021
Attachments:
DIRECTOR REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, January
27, 2021, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting
of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding any item on the
agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during
normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's
website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding
any item on the agenda, please contact the Public Works Department at (951) 694-6444.
Page 3
1
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA PUBLIC / TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
OCTOBER 28, 2021 - 6:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairperson Richardson
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Sullivan
ROLL CALL: Carter, Matics, Richardson, Sullivan
PRESENTATIONS:
Update on the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP)
Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approve Action Minutes of August 26, 2021
Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes
of August 26, 2021.
Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Sullivan, Second by Carter. The vote
reflected unanimous approval.
BUSINESS
2. Election of Vice-Chairperson
Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission elect a Vice-Chairperson
to preside through the remainder of the 2021 Calendar Year.
Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0-1, Carter abstained): Motion by Sullivan, Second by
Matics. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Carter abstaining. Commissioner Carter
was selected to preside as Vice-Chairperson for the remainder of the 2021 calendar year
3. Redhawk Parkway and Peppercorn Drive Geometric Review
Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report.
Receive and file only, no actions.
2
4. Valentino Way-Cutchoque Drive and Vail Ranch Parkway Intersection Control
Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend no changes to
the Valentino Way-Cutchoque Dive and Vail Ranch Parkway
Intersection.
Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Sullivan, Second by Carter. The vote
reflected unanimous approval.
DIVISION REPORTS (Receive and File)
5. California Highway Patrol’s Report
6. Fire Chief's Report
7. Police Chief's Report
8. Traffic Engineer’s Report
DIRECTOR REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:03 PM, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Thursday,
November 25, 2021, at 6:00 PM, in the Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
James J. Richardson, Chairperson
Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
1
PUBLIC TRAFFIC/SAFETY COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: December 7, 2021
SUBJECT: Traffic Cal ming on Roripaugh Road – Stop Controls Analysis
PREPARED BY: Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer
Anissa Sharp, Office Specialist II
RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Controls
at the intersection of Roripaugh Road and Swallow Court.
2. Recommend staff implement striped pedestrian crosswalks at intersection of Roripaugh
Road and Swallow Court pending City Council adoption of Multi-Way Stop Controls.
BACKGROUND: In August of 2021, City of Temecula staff received a request from the
Roripaugh Hills HOA to consider the feasibility of implementing a striped pedestrian crosswalk
at the intersection of Roripaugh Road and Sanderling Way to provide direct access to the
community recreation center and an established pedestrian crossing for students at nearby
schools. Upon review of the intersection, it was determined that this would not be an ideal
location for a crosswalk due to the roadway curvature creating poor line of sight for vehicles to
see pedestrians in the uncontrolled crosswalk. Since the City of Temecula does not typically
support the installation of uncontrolled pedestrian crossings, it was coordinated with the
Roripaugh Hills HOA that staff could instead consider feasibility of installing all-way stop
controls with pedestrian crosswalks at the nearby intersection of Roripaugh Road and Swallow
Court (Exhibit A).
Roripaugh Road is a forty-four (44) foot wide residential collector roadway providing access to
numerous single-family residences between Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. The posted
speed limit on Roripaugh Road is 25 MPH and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on is
approximately 2,700 ADT. Recent speed data collection confirmed an 85th percentile speed of 31
MPH for this stretch of Roripaugh Road.
Swallow Court is a forty (40) foot wide local residential roadway that provides access to
Roripaugh Road for numerous single-family residences located within the neighborhood.
Swallow Court has a speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 97 ADT.
In September 2021, staff collected volume data over a three (3) day period, which included
entering volume data and pedestrian/bicycle volume data at the intersection of Roripaugh Road
2
and Swallow Court. The volume data was used to establish circulation patterns and determine
potential “cut-through” traffic volumes. In addition to the data collection, a review of
intersection characteristics and conditions was performed, which included an evaluation of sight
distance, collision history, and completion of a multi-way stop warrant analysis at the Roripaugh
Road at Swallow Court intersection.
An evaluation of sight distance was performed at the intersection of Roripaugh Road and
Swallow Court. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of 150 feet is required for the posted 25
mph speed limit on both Roripaugh Road and Swallow Court. The results of the evaluation are
shown in the table below:
Location Sight Distance Required Visibility
(Posted 25 MPH)
Swallow Court (Westbound)
Looking South
Looking North
Swallow Court (Eastbound)
Looking South
Looking North
260’
420’
420’
460’
150’
150’
150’
150’
As shown, the visibility at the intersection is more than adequate for both the westbound and
eastbound conditions at Roripaugh Road and Swallow Court.
A review of the collision history for the three (3) year period from November 1, 2018 to October
31, 2021, indicates there were 0 reported collisions at the intersection of Roripaugh Road and
Swallow Court.
The Multi-Way Stop Sign Installation Policy for Residential Streets’ warrant criteria was used to
evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs at the intersection. The warrants allow for the
installation of multi-way stop signs when the following conditions are satisfied:
1. Minimum Traffic Volumes
a. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is equal
to or greater than three hundred (300) vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of
an average day; and
b. The combined vehicular volume and pedestrian volume from the minor street is
equal to or greater than one hundred (100) per hour for the same eight (8) hours.
2. Collision History
a. Three (3) or more reported collisions within a twelve (12) month period of a type
susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include
right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
3
3. Roadway Characteristics
a. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000)
vehicles per day,
b. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more
away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs.
c. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent
(40/60%) split; and
d. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower.
Warrants for Minimum Traffic Volumes, Collision History and Roadway Characteristics must be
met to justify the installation of a multi-way stop. Other criteria that may be considered when
evaluating the need for multi-way stop signs include:
4. Visibility
a. The intersections sight distance is less than:
150 feet for 25 MPH
200 feet for 30 MPH
250 feet for 35 MPH
5. The need to control left-turn conflicts.
6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high
pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers.
7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route to School plan.
8. There are no traffic signals or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of the
intersection.
9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation
needs of the residential area.
The multi-way stop warrant analysis performed found that the required Warrants 1, 2 & 3 were
not satisfied and all-way stop controls are not justified at the intersection based on quantitative
data. The Policy does however provide the flexibility to consider the need to control vehicle and
pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks,
and activity centers. An evaluation of the intersection pedestrian activity determined that, due to
the nearby schools and community recreation center, the residential intersection is experiencing
approximately 120 pedestrians/bikes per day. Additionally, the closest controlled pedestrian
crossing is approximately 1,500’ away at the intersection of Winchester Road/Roripaugh Road
which is not a reasonably convenient location for residents to cross Roripaugh Road. Due to the
high daily pedestrian volume at the intersection and the lack of a nearby controlled pedestrian
crossing, it was determined that the need of a controlled pedestrian crossing via an all-way stop
application is justified.
4
Staff recommends establishing all-way stop controls and striped pedestrian crosswalks at the
intersection of Roripaugh Road and Swallow Court. HOA representatives were notified, and they
have indicated their support this recommendation.
FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with the recommended action.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
Exhibit A - Location Map
Roripaugh Rd
Swallow Ct
Winchester Rd
Roripaugh Rd
& Swallow Ct
Intersection
Sanderling Way
Major Street: 25 MPH
Minor Street:25 MPH
Yes No X
7:00 AM 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM Hour
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes X No
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes X No
Yes No X
Yes X No
Yes X No
split, and
6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate
high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers.
250 feet for 35 MPH
Satisfied
161 158
100
272
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
3 OR MORE
NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
per day,
the intersection.
9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic
circulation needs of the residential area.
The intersection sight distance is less than:
155 feet for 25 MPH
5. The need to control left-turn conflicts.
8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of
MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets)
Critical Approach Speed
Critical Approach Speed
Satisfied1. Minimum Vehicular Volume
Roripaugh Road
Swallow Court
Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
Total All
Approaches
Combined Vehicular
300 256 200 216
200 feet for 30 MPH
(Minor Street)
3. Roadway Characteristics
from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs,
D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower.
4. Visibility
172
5 8 7 7 6 6 5 11
302
7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan.
C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%)
A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles
Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered)
B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away
Ped Volume
(All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied)
2. Collision History Satisfied
Satisfied
1
PUBLIC TRAFFIC/SAFETY COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: December 9, 2021
SUBJECT: Carleton Way Traffic Calming
PREPARED BY: Erick Escobedo, Associate Engineer II
RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend staff
implement advanced warning signs and centerline striping at the knuckle intersections of Carleton
Way.
BACKGROUND: Staff received a request from the Promenade of Temecula HOA to evaluate
the vehicular speeds and cut through traffic on Carleton Way and to consider traffic calming
features to address these traffic concerns. The residents expressed concerns that excess speeding
is occurring throughout the day in the neighborhood and noise levels have increased due to cut
through traffic.
Carleton Way is a thirty-six (36) foot wide residential roadway that functions as a residential
collector for the Promenade of Temecula residents to the arterial roadway network. The Average
Daily Traffic (ADT) on Carleton Way is approximately 563 ADT. Carleton Way is currently
posted at a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH with signs and pavement legends.
Staff conducted a field review of Carleton Way and gathered vehicular speed and volume data
along the street over a seven (7) day period with the Armadillo radar data collection device. The
radar device was installed on a mid-block street light pole facing east for incoming westbound
traffic and it also collected outbound eastbound traffic for Carleton Way. The device yielded the
following results:
The Incoming 85th percentile speed was 21 mph with ADT of 216.
The Outbound 85th percentile speed was 22 mph with ADT of 347 vehicles.
Combined ADT of 563 vehicles is well within the approx. range of 1,800 to 2,400 ADT of
a residential collector, thus indicating no excess cut thru traffic.
The speeds were 3-4 mph below the posted 25 mph speed limit.
Although speeding and cut through traffic were determined to not be an issue at this time, staff did
notice vehicles making sharp turns and cutting through the knuckles to maintain higher speeds.
2
Staff recommends the following measures be implemented:
Install centerline striping around the knuckle intersection (Exhibit B)
Install advanced warning signs prior to entering knuckles (Exhibit B)
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Knuckle Improvements
1
PUBLIC TRAFFIC/SAFETY COMMISSION
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: December 7, 2021
SUBJECT: Engineering and Traffic Survey Update
PREPARED BY: Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend the City
Council adopt an Ordinance reaffirming and adjusting the speed limits identified in the Summary
of Recommended Speed Limits.
BACKGROUND: The California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires local authorities to
review, reaffirm or adjust speed limits within their jurisdiction every seven (7) years based on an
Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey. The CVC also mandates that new speed limits be
established based on an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The E&T survey provides the mechanism
for the legal enforcement of the posted speed limit using radar or any other electronic speed-
measuring device.
As defined in the California Vehicle Code, an engineering and traffic survey is “a survey of
highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of
Transportation for use by state and local authorities.” The survey shall include, but not be limited
to, consideration of prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements, accident
statistics, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. These
characteristics are all considered when determining a reasonable and prudent posted speed limit.
It should be noted that establishing a speed limit, which is not consistent with the 85th percentile
speed, constitutes a “speed trap” and is not enforceable using radar or any other electronic speed-
measuring device.
Willdan Engineering conducted an E&T Survey on twenty-one (21) roadways, which included
thirty-nine (39) segments. The survey indicates that most existing speed limits do not require a
change, and the recommended speed limits are consistent with the existing posted speed limits.
There are, however, seventeen (17) segments where the existing posted speed limit is
recommended to be adjusted. The segments are as follows:
Avenida Buena Suerte – Del Rey Road to Avenida Centenario 30 MPH to 25 MPH
Avenida Centenario – Avenida Buena Suerte to Via Norte 30 MPH to 25 MPH
Channel Street – Butterfield Stage Road to Chaote Street 35 MPH to 25 MPH
Harveston Drive – Harveston Way to Fairmont Lane 35 MPH to 30 MPH
Harveston Drive – Fairmont Lane to Lakeview Road 35 MPH to 30 MPH
La Paz Street – Temecula Parkway to Ynez Road 35 MPH to 25 MPH
2
Murrieta Hot Springs Rd – Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road Not Posted to 50 MPH
Overland Drive- Enterprise Circle to Jefferson Avenue 35 MPH to 30 MPH
Rainbow Canyon Road- South City Limits to Temecula Creek Inn 40 MPH to 35 MPH
Rainbow Canyon Road- Temecula Creek Inn to Pechanga Parkway 40 MPH to 35 MPH
Redhawk Parkway- Vail Ranch Parkway to Wolf Valley Road 45 MPH to 40 MPH
Redhawk Parkway- Wolf Valley Road to Peppercorn Drive 45 MPH to 40 MPH
Redhawk Parkway- Peppercorn Drive to El Chimisal/Tehachapi Pass 45 MPH to 40 MPH
Redhawk Parkway- El Chimisal/Tehachapi Pass to Nighthawk Pass 45 MPH to 40 MPH
Temecula Lane- Loma Linda Drive to Canterfield Drive Not Posted to 25 MPH
Vail Ranch Pkwy- Nighthawk Pass to Harmony Lane/Terzich Drive 45 MPH to 40 MPH
Vail Ranch Pkwy- Harmony Lane/Terzich Drive to Redhawk Parkway 45 MPH to 40 MPH
The recommended posted speed limits conform to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code
and the Caltrans MUTCD for establishing prudent posted speed limits that are consistent with
roadway conditions, prevailing speeds, and more importantly, enforceable.
Staff recommends the Commission approve a recommendation that the City Council adopt an
Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in Attachment 1 Summary of Recommendations.
The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission’s consideration of this issue
through the agenda notification process.
FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for installation of signs and pavement
legends in the Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division’s Operating Budget.
ATTACHMENTS: 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
2 - Willdan Engineering - 2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Name of Street
Portion Affected
Existing
Speed
Limit
Proposed
Speed
Limit
Avenida Buena Suerte Del Rey Road to Avenida Centenario 30 25
Avenida Centenario Avenida Buena Suerte to Via Norte 30 25
Business Park Drive Rancho California Road to Rancho Way 35 35
Business Park Drive Rancho Way to Diaz Road 35 35
Channel Street Butterfield Stage Road to Chaote Street 35 25
Country Glen Way Via Rio Temecula to Temecula Parkway 35 35
Date Street Ynez Road to Lakeview Road 50 50
Date Street Lakeview Road to East City Limits 45 45
Del Rey Road Via Norte to Solana Way 30 30
Del Rey Road Solana Way to Calle Pina Colada 30 30
Harveston Drive Harveston Way to Fairmont Lane 35 30
Harveston Drive Fairmont Lane to Lakeview Road 35 30
Harveston Drive Lakeview Road to Harveston School Road 30 30
La Paz Street Temecula Parkway to Ynez Road 35 25
Loma Linda Drive Pechanga Parkway to Via Del Coronado 35 35
Murrieta Hot Springs
Rd
Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road NP 50
Nicolas Road Winchester Road to North General Kearny
Road
45 45
Nicolas Road North General Kearny Road to Joseph Road 45 45
Nicolas Road Joseph Road to Calle Medusa 45 45
Nicolas Road Calle Medusa to Calle Girasol 45 45
North General Kearney
Rd
Margarita Road to Calle Pina Colada 40 40
Old Town Front Street Temecula Parkway to Santiago Road 40 40
Overland Drive Enterprise Circle to Jefferson Ave 35 30
Overland Drive Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road 40 40
Overland Drive Ynez Road to Margarita Road 40 40
Rainbow Canyon Road South City Limits to Temecula Creek Inn 40 35
Rainbow Canyon Road Temecula Creek Inn to Pechanga
Parkway
40 35
Redhawk Parkway Vail Ranch Parkway to Wolf Valley Rd 45 40
Redhawk Parkway Wolf Valley Rd to Peppercorn Drive 45 40
Redhawk Parkway Peppercorn Dr to El Chimisal/ Tehachapi
Pass 45 40
Redhawk Parkway El Chimisal/ Tehachapi Pass to
Nighthawk Pass 45 40
Township Road Village Road to Harveston Drive 25 25
Temecula Lane Loma Linda Drive to Canterfield Drive NP 25
Vail Ranch Parkway Nighthawk Pass to Harmony
Lane/Terzich Dr
45 40
Vail Ranch Parkway Harmony Ln/Terzich Dr to Redhawk Pkwy 45 40
Via Norte Solana Way to Del Rey Road 30 30
Via Norte Del Rey Road to Calle Pina Colada (N) 30 30
Via Norte Calle Pina Colada to Avenida Centenario 35 35
Via Norte Avenida Centenario to Avenida Del Reposo 35 35
Bold indicates speed limit changes.
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
Engineering and Traffic Survey
2021
NOVEMBER
November 16, 2021
Mr. Nick Minicilli, PE, TE
Senior Civil Engineer
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject: 2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
Dear Mr. Minicilli:
As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey to justify
and update the posted speed limits along 39 street segments in the City of Temecula.
These segments were last surveyed in 2014 and require an update to comply with the 7-
year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).
We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures
and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial a nd collector
street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis.
Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the
Appendices.
The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following
procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California
MUTCD) dated November 2014, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is
intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued
use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.
We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Temecula and the assistance and
cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study.
Very truly yours,
WILLDAN
Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E.
Traffic Engineer
Enclosure
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1-2
Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey ........................................ 2-3
SURVEY CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 4
Survey Locations ........................................................................................ 4
Data Collection ........................................................................................... 4
Speed Data ............................................................................................ 4
Collision Data ......................................................................................... 5
Field Review Data .................................................................................. 5
ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 6
Criteria ........................................................................................................ 6
Results and Recommendations ................................................................. 6-7
Table 1-Street Segments With Recommended Speed Changes ............... 8
Table 2-Summary of Recommendations .................................................... 9-12
Segments with Special Conditions ............................................................. 13
LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES .................................................................... 14
Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code .......................................... 14-19
APPENDIX A - Segment Data
APPENDIX B
- Radar Speed Distribution Forms
- Raw Radar Speed Distribution Forms
APPENDIX C - Survey Equipment Used
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
1 City of Temecula
INTRODUCTION
This Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment,
revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Temecula.
This E&T Survey presents recommended speed limits for 39 street segments in the City of
Temecula. E&T Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate
speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed
measuring devices. These surveys must be updated every 5 or 7 years to ensure the
speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The
CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated
November 2014.
The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable
the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for
speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the
prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further
specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to
7 years provided the City’s police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator
course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)]. Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 10 years
if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred
[CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept
reasonably current.
The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in
the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated
November 2014 and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes
three elements of an E&T Survey:
1. Measurement of prevailing speed;
2. Accident history; and
3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist.
Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless
and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a
clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC
Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a
speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the
traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which
endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a
clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving
conditions.
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
2 City of Temecula
The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers
behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and
competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits
established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who dri ve the
highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few
individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of
reasonable drivers.
Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily
apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions,
traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits.
Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway
conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in
length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.
Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced
without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose
behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for
enforcement.
ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated
November 2014 specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This
methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident histo ry and
conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&T Survey are
discussed in more detail as follows:
Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar
unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a
statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the
distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85 th
percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of
the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and
reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a
speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th
percentile speed, except as shown in the two options below.
Options:
1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of
the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would
require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5
mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.
Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
3 City of Temecula
If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall
document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons
for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5
The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:
A. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in
a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be
established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed.
As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduce d by
5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are
documented in the E&TS.
B. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a
speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established
at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As
indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30
mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are
documented in the E&TS.
C. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a
speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the
speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied.
Collision History
Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher
than average rate of collisions. A segment that has an above -average collision rate
typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.
A summary of the collision rates for the 39 surveyed street segments is provided in Table 2.
Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may no t be
readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are
significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the
basic speed limit. It is important to note that The California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014 recommends exercising great
care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit.
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
4 City of Temecula
SURVEY CONDITIONS
SURVEY LOCATIONS
The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected
streets within the City of Temecula. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each
street segment was selected after considering the following:
1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.
2. Minimum visibility restrictions.
3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.
4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect
the normal operation of a vehicle.
DATA COLLECTION
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic
collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data
and field reviews were conducted at 39 locations during the months of July and August
2021.
Speed Data
Radar speed measurements were conducted at 39 locations during the months of July and
August 2021. The radar speed distribution forms are in Attachment B. All surveys were
conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit
was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior.
Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum
period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were
recorded for individual segments.
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
5 City of Temecula
Collision Data
Collision data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated
Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic collision database. For this study, collision
data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2018 to
December 31, 2020. The collision rates for the 39 segments are expressed in accidents
per million vehicle miles (A/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were
collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following
formula to determine the collision rate:
xlxvyear
daystx
AxR
365
000,000,1=
A = Number of midblock collisions over time period
R = Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles)
t = Time Period Covered (in years)
l = Length of Segment (miles)
v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate. The
average statewide collision rates were obtained from 2018 Collision Data on California
State Highways published by Caltrans.
Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with
consideration for the following factors:
1. Street width and alignment (design speed);
2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;
3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;
4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;
5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;
6. Visibility obstructions;
7. Land use and proximity to schools;
8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;
9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and
10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
6 City of Temecula
ANALYSIS
CRITERIA
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in
accordance with several criteria contained in The California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014. Some of the criteria used are:
A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85
percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what
the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than
the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower
than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do
not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph
increment to the 85th percentile speed.
B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the
highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across
the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit
within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that
might require a speed lower than the critical speed.
C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that
can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions,
in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average collision rates
have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for
use in the City of Temecula.
RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a
thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street
segment surveyed. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 2. In
each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as
demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed l imit in the upper
range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a collision rate significantly higher than
expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were
identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic
speed limit are fully explained later in this report.
The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical
conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition
readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for
special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section
22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions.
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed
limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
7 City of Temecula
speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of CVC).
This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe
having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to
establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.
Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limits
and Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments.
TABLE 1
STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES
No. Street From To Existing New Change
1 Avenida Buena Suerte Del Rey Road Avenida Centenario 30 25 - 5
2 Avenida Centenario Avenida Buena Suerte Via Norte 30 25 - 5
5 Channel Street Butterfield Stage Road Chaote Street 35 25 - 10
11 Harveston Drive Harveston Way Fairmont Ln 35 30 - 5
12 Harveston Drive Fairmont Ln Lakeview Road 35 30 - 5
14 La Paz Street Temecula Parkway Ynez Road 35 25 - 10
16 Murrieta Hot Springs Pourroy Road Butterfield Stage
Road Road
NP 50 PL
23 Overland Drive Enterprise Circle Jefferson Avenue 35 30 - 5
26 Rainbow Canyon Road South City Limits Temecula Creek Inn 40 35 - 5
27 Rainbow Canyon Road Temecula Creek Inn Pechanga Parkway 40 35 - 5
28 Redhawk Parkway Vail Ranch Parkway Wolf Valley Road 45 40 - 5
29 Redhawk Parkway Wolf Valley Road Peppercorn Drive 45 40 - 5
30 Redhawk Parkway Peppercorn Drive El Chimisal /
Tehachapi Pass
45 40 - 5
31 Redhawk Parkway El Chimisal / Nighthawk Pass
Tehachapi Pass
45 40 - 5
33 Temecula Lane Loma Linda Drive Canterfield Drive NP 25 PL
34 Vail Ranch Parkway Nighthawk Pass Harmony Lane /
Terzich Drive
45 40 - 5
35 Vail Ranch Parkway Harmony Lane / Redhawk Parkway
Terzich Drive
45 40 - 5
NP= Not Posted
PL= Post Limit
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey 8
City of Temecula
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
Avenida Buena
Suerte
Del Rey Road Avenida
Centenario 293 271.60 19-280.000.54 97 Closest to 85th Speed25301%
Avenida
Centenario
Avenida Buena
Suerte
Via Norte 256 311.60 23-320.000.27 95 *25302%
Business Park
Drive
Rancho California
Road
Rancho Way 1,030 401.60 27-361.000.89 63 *35353%
Business Park
Drive
Rancho Way Diaz Road 1,487 371.60 26-350.000.36 68 Closest to 85th Speed35354%
Channel Street Butterfield Stage
Road
Chaote Street 553 271.60 17-260.000.3 81 Closest to 85th Speed25355**** %
Country Glen
Way
Via Rio Temecula Temecula
Parkway 1,018 351.60 26-354.720.19 73 Closest to 85th Speed35356%
Date Street Ynez Road Lakeview Road 13,079 500.91 42-510.140.5 84 Closest to 85th Speed50507%
Date Street Lakeview Road East City Limits 7,500 430.98 31-400.000.52 65 Closest to 85th Speed45458%
Del Rey Road Via Norte Solana Way 1,305 311.60 23-320.000.38 82 Closest to 85th Speed30309%
Del Rey Road Solana Way Calle Pina
Colada (S)2,760 321.60 23-320.000.44 86 Closest to 85th Speed303010%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
9
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
Harveston Drive Harveston Way Fairmont Ln 1,874 321.60 22-310.810.6 76 Closest to 85th Speed303511%
Harveston Drive Fairmont Ln Lakeview Road 1,848 321.60 23-310.000.32 76 Closest to 85th Speed303512%
Harveston Drive Lakeview Road Harveston
School Road 1,201 321.60 22-310.000.57 72 Closest to 85th Speed303013****%
La Paz Street Temecula Parkway Ynez Road 10,309 371.60 28-370.000.26 82 *253514%
Loma Linda
Road
Pechanga Parkway Via Del
Coronado 3,617 391.60 30-390.490.52 72 California MUTCD Option 2353515**** %
Murrieta Hot
Springs Road
Pourroy Road Butterfield
Stage Road 21,383 490.91 37-460.110.77 66 Closest to 85th Speed50NP16%
Nicolas Road Winchester Road North General
Kearny Road 8,681 430.93 33-420.180.59 80 Closest to 85th Speed454517%
Nicolas Road North General
Kearny Road
Joseph Road 9,028 490.93 38-470.160.64 68 California MUTCD Option 2454518%
Nicolas Road Joseph Road Calle Medusa 7,177 481.60 39-480.000.47 73 California MUTCD Option 2454519%
Nicolas Road Calle Medusa Calle Girasol 4,097 481.60 38-470.000.14 73 California MUTCD Option 2454520%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
10
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
North General
Kearny Road
Margarita Road Calle Pina
Colada 4,630 430.93 34-430.000.56 70 California MUTCD Option 2404021****%
Old Town
Front Street
Temecula Parkway Santiago Road 11,485 421.44 32-410.370.65 66 Closest to 85th Speed404022%
Overland Drive Enterprise Circle Jefferson
Avenue 5,736 311.60 23-320.000.22 87 Closest to 85th Speed303523%
Overland Drive Jefferson Avenue Ynez Road 19,821 450.93 37-460.000.33 74 *404024%
Overland Drive Ynez Road Margarita Road 16,382 380.91 29-380.190.29 67 Closest to 85th Speed404025%
Rainbow
Canyon Road
South City Limits Temecula
Creek Inn 15,029 371.60 29-380.111.09 84 Closest to 85th Speed354026%
Rainbow
Canyon Road
Temecula Creek
Inn
Pechanga
Parkway 10,880 421.60 33-420.000.5 73 *354027%
Redhawk
Parkway
Vail Ranch
Parkway
Wolf Valley
Road 27,546 410.91 33-420.450.37 82 Closest to 85th Speed404528%
Redhawk
Parkway
Wolf Valley Road Peppercorn
Drive 14,401 390.91 30-390.000.5 75 Closest to 85th Speed404529%
Redhawk
Parkway
Peppercorn Drive El Chimisal /
Tehachapi Pass 9,379 401.60 31-400.110.92 75 Closest to 85th Speed404530%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
11
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Accident
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.
Pace
% in
PaceAct.
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.
Speed
Limit CommentsNo.
Redhawk
Parkway
El Chimisal /
Tehachapi Pass
Nighthawk Pass 6,205 401.60 31-400.000.2 82 Closest to 85th Speed404531%
Township Road Village Road Harveston Drive 911 251.60 16-250.000.06 88 Closest to 85th Speed252532%
Temecula Lane Loma Linda Drive Canterfield
Drive 571 261.60 18-270.000.24 90 Closest to 85th Speed25NP33%
Vail Ranch
Parkway
Nighthawk Pass Harmony Lane /
Terzich Drive 5,629 401.60 31-400.000.76 78 Closest to 85th Speed404534%
Vail Ranch
Parkway
Harmony Lane /
Terzich Drive
Redhawk
Parkway 4,429 391.60 30-390.000.59 85 Closest to 85th Speed404535%
Via Norte Solana Way Del Rey Road 849 311.60 24-330.000.35 91 Closest to 85th Speed303036%
Via Norte Del Rey Road Calle Pina
Colada (N)2,092 361.60 29-380.000.34 72 *303037%
Via Norte Calle Pina Colada Avenida
Centenario 1,720 371.60 28-370.001.06 75 Closest to 85th Speed353538%
Via Norte Avenida CentenarioAvenida Del
Reposo 852 351.60 26-350.000.82 71 Closest to 85th Speed353539%
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments
** 25 mph when children are present
12
*** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
13 City of Temecula
SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per
hour (mph) or more below the critical speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the
driver. Each segment is discussed below.
Segment #2 – Avenida Centenario – Avenida Buena Suerte to Via Norte
This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction
undivided with an ADT of 256 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the
0.27-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 31 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph
posted speed limit. However, due to hidden driveways that may not be apparent to
unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower
speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 25 mph for the
above reasons.
Segment #3 – Business Park Drive – Rancho California Road to Rancho Way
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction
undivided with an ADT of 1,030 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial along
the 0.89-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40
mph posted speed limit. However, due to horizontal curves, and to maintain uniformity
between adjacent street segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that
the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #14 – La Paz Street – Temecula Parkway to Ynez Road
This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction
undivided with an ADT of 10,309 vehicles per day. There are single family homes on both
sides of the street. The critical speed is 37 mph and would normally just ify a 35 mph posted
speed limit. When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may consider if an
E&T is necessary or if a prima facie speed limit is appropriate on a local residential
roadway. In order to be defined a local roadway, the segment needs to be classified as a
local roadway on the California Road System Map, primarily provides access to abutting
residential property, is less than 40-feet wide, has no more than 1 lane in each direction.
and is less than 0.5 miles of uninterrupted roadway. This segment is classified as a local
street on the California Road System Map and primarily provides access to abutting
residential property. La Paz Road has 1 through lane in each direction and is 25-feet wide
and is 0.26 miles long between traffic controls. This roadway meets the requirements to
classify as a prima facie local roadway, therefore it is recommended that the speed limit be
posted at 25 mph.
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
14 City of Temecula
Segment #24 – Overland Drive – Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 2 through lane in each direction
undivided with an ADT of 19,821 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial along
the 0.33-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45
mph posted speed limit. However, to maintain uniformity between adjacent street
segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at
40 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #27 – Rainbow Canyon Road – Temecula Creek Inn to Pechanga Parkway
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction
undivided with an ADT of 10,880 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is vacant and a golf
course along the 0.5-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 42 mph and would normally
justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to an unmarked crosswalk that may not
be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street
segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted
at 35 mph for the above reasons.
Segment #37 – Via Norte – Del Rey Road to Calle Pina Colada (N)
This segment is currently posted at 30 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction
undivided with an ADT of 2,092 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the
0.34-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 36 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph
posted speed limit. However, due to hidden driveways that may not be apparent to
unfamiliar drivers, and to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a lower
speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 30 mph for the
above reasons.
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
15 City of Temecula
LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES
APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE
SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code:
Section 627.
(a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic
conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for
use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed
necessary by the department, consideration of all of the fo llowing:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
(2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
(c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in ad dition to the
factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the
following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of
highway and the property contiguous there to, other than a business district:
a. Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the
contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate
dwelling houses of business structures.
b. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of
a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more
separate dwelling houses or business structures.
c. The portion of highway is longer than one -quarter of a mile but has the ratio
of separate dwelling houses or bus iness structures to the length of the
highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Section 21400.
(b) The Department of Transportation shall revise the California Manual on Uniform Tra ffic
Control Devices, as it read on January 1, 2012, to require the Department of Transportation
or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th
percentile of the free-flowing traffic. However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be
rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the
Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the
speed limit to the lower five miles per hour incremen t, but then the Department o f
Transportation or a local authority shall not reduce the speed limit any further for any
reason.
Basic Speed Law
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or
prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the
highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
16 City of Temecula
Speed Law Violations
Section 22351.
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section
22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in
violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed lim its in
Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the
defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not
constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place a nd under the conditions then
existing.
Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22352.
The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unles s changed as authorized in this
code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the
approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of
the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both
directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any
railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible
electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is inst alled but does not then
indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the
driver’s approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and
unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways
entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except
at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right -of-way signs or controlled by
official traffic control signals.
(3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district
unless a different speed is determined by local author ity under procedures set forth
in this code.
(2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof,
contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while
children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the
noon recess period. The pri ma facie limit shall also apply when approaching or
passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence,
gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the
highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" w arning sign. For purposes of this
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
17 City of Temecula
subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL " warning signs may be placed at any distance up
to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens,
contiguous to a s treet other than a state highway and posted with a standard
"SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this
paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing
should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the
Pedestrian Safety Account pursuant to Section 894.7 of the Streets and Highways
Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for
the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the
erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
Increase of Local Speed Limits to 65 Miles Per Hour
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority d etermines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey
that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of
vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state
highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may
by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60
miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most
appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The
declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs
giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revis ed except
upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25
mile per hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the
grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facili ty primarily used by senior
citizens.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section
22366.
Downward Speed Zoning
Section 22358.5.
It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface
conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would
not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient
regulation as to such conditions.
Boundary Line Streets
Section 22359.
With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different
jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any
such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have
approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of
separate roadways within different jurisdictions.
Speed Trap Prohibition
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
18 City of Temecula
Section 40801.
No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in
the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in
securing evidence as to the speed o f any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under
this code.
Speed Trap
Section 40802.
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries
marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle
may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known
distance.
(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by
this code or by local ordinance under subpara graph (A) of paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358,
or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic
survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and
enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic
device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to
a local street, road, or school zone.
(b)(1) For purposes o f this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as
“local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway
Administration and maintained by the Department of Transport ation. When a street or road
does not appear on the “California Road System Maps,” it may be defined as a “local street
or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the
following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width o f not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include
official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school
building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a
standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either
during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area
approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a
fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children i f that highway
is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
(c)(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable
and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting offic er has successfully complete d a radar
operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
19 City of Temecula
course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards
and Training.
(B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving
objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in
subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours
approved and certified by the Commission on Peac e Officer Standards and Training.
(C)(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A)
and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in
accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The pro secution proved that,
prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that
the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of
subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions
present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of
Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the
accused meets or exceeds the minimal operat ional standards of the National Traffic
Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior
to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair
and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries
marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle
may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known
distance.
(B)(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that
is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph
(2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357,
22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering
and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the
date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of
radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years.
(II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years
prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates
the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in
roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limi ted to,
changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume,
10 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
Speed Trap Evidence
Section 40803.
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
20 City of Temecula
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a ve hicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court
upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the
speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the
maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where
enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed
of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the
evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2)
of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision
(a) of Sec tion 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted
within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was
committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Sect ion
40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a
speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802.
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 1
STREET Avenida Buena Suerte
FROM Del Rey Road TO Avenida Centenario
Average Daily Traffic 293 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2021
Time of Speed Survey 11:56 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)24
85th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace Speed 19-28
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 97
Posted Speed Limit 30
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ DEL REY ROAD
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.540
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions FAIR
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 59
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 25
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 24 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 2
STREET Avenida Centenario
FROM Avenida Buena Suerte TO Via Norte
Average Daily Traffic 256 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2021
Time of Speed Survey 1:59 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29
85th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 95
Posted Speed Limit 30
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ VIA NORTE
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.270
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions FAIR
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 55
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 25
UNIFORMITY W/ ADJ. SEG., HIDDEN
DWYS
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 29 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 3
STREET Business Park Drive
FROM Rancho California Road TO Rancho Way
Average Daily Traffic 1,030 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2021
Time of Speed Survey 9:40 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)32
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ RANCHO CALIFORNIA
Crosswalks?@TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.890
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?EAST SIDE ONLY
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 192
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 35
UNIFORMITY W/ ADJ. SEG.,
HORIZONTAL CURVE
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 33 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 4
STREET Business Park Drive
FROM Rancho Way TO Diaz Road
Average Daily Traffic 1,487 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2021
Time of Speed Survey 10:45 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)31
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ DIAZ
Crosswalks?UNMARKED CROSSWALK @ SINGLE OAK DR
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.360
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?EAST SIDE ONLY
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 124
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 35
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 32 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 5
STREET Channel Street
FROM Butterfield Stage Road TO Chaote Street
Average Daily Traffic 553 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/14/2021
Time of Speed Survey 8:57 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)23
85th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace Speed 17-26
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ BUTTERFIELD STAGE, STOP @ DORCHESTER DR
Crosswalks?BOTH SIDES
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.300
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 43
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 101
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 25
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 23 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 6
STREET Country Glen Way
FROM Via Rio Temecula TO Temecula Parkway
Average Daily Traffic 1,018 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/15/2021
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 4.72
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ TEMECULA, STOP @ VIA RIO TEMECULA
Crosswalks?BOTH SIDES
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.190
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 115
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 35
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 30 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 7
STREET Date Street
FROM Ynez Road TO Lakeview Road
Average Daily Traffic 13,079 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2021
Time of Speed Survey 2:15 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)47
85th Percentile Speed 50
10 mph Pace Speed 42-51
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84
Posted Speed Limit 50
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.91
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.14
Number of Lanes 4 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ YNEZ RD, LAKEVIEW RD
Crosswalks?@ TS
Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.500
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 110
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 250
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 50
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 47 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 8
STREET Date Street
FROM Lakeview Road TO East City Limits
Average Daily Traffic 7,500 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2021
Time of Speed Survey 2:45 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 6 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ LAKEVIEW RD, KINGWOOD, MARGARITA RD
Crosswalks?@ TS
Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.520
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?NO
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 110
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 233
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 45
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 37 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 9
STREET Del Rey Road
FROM Via Norte TO Solana Way
Average Daily Traffic 1,305 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2021
Time of Speed Survey 10:45 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27
85th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limit 30
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ VIA NORTE, SOLANA WAY
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.380
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 108
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 30
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 27 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 10
STREET Del Rey Road
FROM Solana Way TO Calle Pina Colada (S)
Average Daily Traffic 2,760 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/22/2021
Time of Speed Survey 9:09 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)28
85th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86
Posted Speed Limit 30
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ SOLANA WAY, AVENIDA BARCA, CALLE PINA COLADA
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.440
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 132
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 30
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 28 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 11
STREET Harveston Drive
FROM Harveston Way TO Fairmont Ln
Average Daily Traffic 1,874 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2021
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27
85th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.81
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ HARVESTON WAY, FAIRMOUNT LN
Crosswalks?@ STOP AND MIDBLOCK
Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.600
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 46
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, PARK
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 129
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 30
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 27 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 12
STREET Harveston Drive
FROM Fairmont Ln TO Lakeview Road
Average Daily Traffic 1,848 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2021
Time of Speed Survey 10:04 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27
85th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace Speed 23-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ FAIRMOUNT LN, LAKEVIEW RD
Crosswalks?@ STOP
Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.320
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 46
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, PARK
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 161
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 30
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 28 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 13
STREET Harveston Drive
FROM Lakeview Road TO Harveston School Road
Average Daily Traffic 1,201 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2021
Time of Speed Survey 11:06 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)26
85th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace Speed 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 30
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ LAKEVIEW RD, HAVERSTON SCHOOL RD
Crosswalks?@ STOP
Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.570
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 46
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 125
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 30
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 27 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 14
STREET La Paz Street
FROM Temecula Parkway TO Ynez Road
Average Daily Traffic 10,309 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/15/2021
Time of Speed Survey 3:17 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)32
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS@TEMECULA PARKWAY
Crosswalks?@ TS AND YNEZ ROAD
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.260
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions FAIR
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 26
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 216
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 25
SEGMENT CLASSIFIED AS A LOCAL
STREET ON THE CALIFORNIA ROAD
SYSTEM MAP
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 33 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 15
STREET Loma Linda Road
FROM Pechanga Parkway TO Via Del Coronado
Average Daily Traffic 3,617 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/15/2021
Time of Speed Survey 12:13 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.49
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ PECHANGA PKWY, STOP @ VIA DEL CORONADO
Crosswalks?@TS AND STOP
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NO
Length of Segment 0.520
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions FAIR
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 55
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 206
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 35
CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 34 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 16
STREET Murrieta Hot Springs Road
FROM Pourroy Road TO Butterfield Stage Road
Average Daily Traffic 21,383 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/28/2021
Time of Speed Survey 10:30 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)42
85th Percentile Speed 49
10 mph Pace Speed 37-46
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limit NP
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 2
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.91
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.11
Number of Lanes 4 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ POURROY RD, BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD
Crosswalks?@ POURROY RD
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic MODERATE
On-Street Parking NO
Length of Segment 0.770
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 86
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 216
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 50
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 42 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 17
STREET Nicolas Road
FROM Winchester Road TO North General Kearny Road
Average Daily Traffic 8,681 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2021
Time of Speed Survey 3:25 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)38
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.18
Number of Lanes 4 LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ WINCHESTER RD, RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CTR, GEN
KEARNY
Crosswalks?@ TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.590
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 86
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, PARK
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 233
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 45
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 38 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 18
STREET Nicolas Road
FROM North General Kearny Road TO Joseph Road
Average Daily Traffic 9,028 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/22/2021
Time of Speed Survey 2:14 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)43
85th Percentile Speed 49
10 mph Pace Speed 38-47
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.16
Number of Lanes 4 LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ GEN KEARNY
Crosswalks?@ TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.640
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?NO
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NO
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 86
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, PARK
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 213
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 45
CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 43 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 19
STREET Nicolas Road
FROM Joseph Road TO Calle Medusa
Average Daily Traffic 7,177 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/22/2021
Time of Speed Survey 2:41 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)43
85th Percentile Speed 48
10 mph Pace Speed 39-48
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control NONE
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.470
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions FAIR
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?NO
Lighting NONE
Width 26-56
Adjacent Land Use RELIGIOUS CENTER, VACANT
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 215
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 45
CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 43 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 20
STREET Nicolas Road
FROM Calle Medusa TO Calle Girasol
Average Daily Traffic 4,097 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/22/2021
Time of Speed Survey 3:16 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)44
85th Percentile Speed 48
10 mph Pace Speed 38-47
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control NONE
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.140
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?NO
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?SOUTH SIDE ONLY
Driveways?NO
Lighting NONE
Width 52
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, VACANT
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 211
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 45
CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 44 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 21
STREET North General Kearny Road
FROM Margarita Road TO Calle Pina Colada
Average Daily Traffic 4,630 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/28/2021
Time of Speed Survey 12:10 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)38
85th Percentile Speed 43
10 mph Pace Speed 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 40
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 4 LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ MARGARITA RD, CAM CAMPOS VERDE
Crosswalks?@ TS
Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NORTH SIDE
Length of Segment 0.560
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NO
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 68
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL, RELIGIOUS CENTER
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 209
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 38 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 22
STREET Old Town Front Street
FROM Temecula Parkway TO Santiago Road
Average Daily Traffic 11,485 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2021
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limit 40
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 3
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.44
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.37
Number of Lanes 3 LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ SANTIAGO RD, TEMECULA PKWY
Crosswalks?@TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking WEST SIDE
Length of Segment 0.650
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 54-60
Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 235
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 37 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 23
STREET Overland Drive
FROM Enterprise Circle TO Jefferson Avenue
Average Daily Traffic 5,736 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2021
Time of Speed Survey 1:50 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)28
85th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace Speed 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ ENTERPRISE CIR, COMMERCE CENTER DR, JEFFERSON AVE
Crosswalks?@ STOP
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.220
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?NO
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 44-68
Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 214
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 30
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 28 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 24
STREET Overland Drive
FROM Jefferson Avenue TO Ynez Road
Average Daily Traffic 19,821 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2021
Time of Speed Survey 2:30 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)40
85th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace Speed 37-46
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit 40
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 4 LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ JEFFERSON AVE, YNEZ RD
Crosswalks?@ TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.330
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 86
Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 216
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
UNIFORMITY W/ ADJ. SEG.
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 40 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 25
STREET Overland Drive
FROM Ynez Road TO Margarita Road
Average Daily Traffic 16,382 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2021
Time of Speed Survey 3:06 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33
85th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limit 40
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.91
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.19
Number of Lanes 4 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ YNEZ RD, NICOLE LN, MARGARITA RD
Crosswalks?@TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.290
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 214
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 33 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 26
STREET Rainbow Canyon Road
FROM South City Limits TO Temecula Creek Inn
Average Daily Traffic 15,029 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/15/2021
Time of Speed Survey 1:45 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)34
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84
Posted Speed Limit 40
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 2
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.11
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ PECHANGA PKWY
Crosswalks?@TS
Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 1.090
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?EAST SIDES
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 44
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, GOLF COURSE
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 215
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 35
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 33 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 27
STREET Rainbow Canyon Road
FROM Temecula Creek Inn TO Pechanga Parkway
Average Daily Traffic 10,880 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/15/2021
Time of Speed Survey 2:27 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37
85th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limit 40
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control NONE
Crosswalks?UNMARKED CROSSWALK N OF TEMECULA CREEK INN
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.500
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions FAIR
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?NONE
Lighting NONE
Width 32
Adjacent Land Use GOLF COURSE, VACANT
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 229
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 35
UNIFORMITY W/ ADJ. SEG.,
UNMARKED CROSSWALK
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 37 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 28
STREET Redhawk Parkway
FROM Vail Ranch Parkway TO Wolf Valley Road
Average Daily Traffic 27,546 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/14/2021
Time of Speed Survey 1:20 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37
85th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace Speed 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 5
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.91
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.45
Number of Lanes 4 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ VAIL RANCH PKWY, WOLF VALLEY RD
Crosswalks?@ TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.370
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES + MEDIAN
Width 82
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 225
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 37 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 29
STREET Redhawk Parkway
FROM Wolf Valley Road TO Peppercorn Drive
Average Daily Traffic 14,401 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/14/2021
Time of Speed Survey 12:46 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)34
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.91
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 4 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ WOLF VALLEY RD, PEPPERCORN DR
Crosswalks?@ TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.500
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES + MEDIAN
Width 82
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 221
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 34 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 30
STREET Redhawk Parkway
FROM Peppercorn Drive TO El Chimisal / Tehachapi Pass
Average Daily Traffic 9,379 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/14/2021
Time of Speed Survey 12:03 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.11
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ PEPPERCORN DR, TEHACHAPI PASS
Crosswalks?@ TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.920
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES + MEDIAN
Width 82
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 228
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 36 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 31
STREET Redhawk Parkway
FROM El Chimisal / Tehachapi Pass TO Nighthawk Pass
Average Daily Traffic 6,205 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/14/2021
Time of Speed Survey 11:05 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ TEHACHAPI PASS, NIGHTHAWK PASS
Crosswalks?@TS
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.200
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting EAST SIDE + MEDIAN
Width 82
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 224
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 36 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 32
STREET Township Road
FROM Village Road TO Harveston Drive
Average Daily Traffic 911 Date Counted 7/15/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2021
Time of Speed Survey 12:10 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)21
85th Percentile Speed 25
10 mph Pace Speed 16-25
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88
Posted Speed Limit 25
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ HARVESTON DR, YIELD @ VILLAGE RD
Crosswalks?@STOP
Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.060
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?NO
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 44
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 67
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 25
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 22 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 33
STREET Temecula Lane
FROM Loma Linda Drive TO Canterfield Drive
Average Daily Traffic 571 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/15/2021
Time of Speed Survey 11:11 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)23
85th Percentile Speed 26
10 mph Pace Speed 18-27
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 90
Posted Speed Limit NP
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ LOMA LINDA RD, CANTERFIELD DRIVE
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.240
Vertical Curve?NO
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES
Width 42
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, PARK
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 129
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 25
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 22 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 34
STREET Vail Ranch Parkway
FROM Nighthawk Pass TO Harmony Lane / Terzich Drive
Average Daily Traffic 5,629 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/14/2021
Time of Speed Survey 2:55 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)35
85th Percentile Speed 40
10 mph Pace Speed 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ NIGHTHAWK PASS, STOP @ CAMINO PIEDRA ROJO, HARMONY
LN
Crosswalks?@ TS, @ STOP AND CAMINO RUBANO
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.760
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES + MEDIAN
Width 82
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, PARK
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 240
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 35 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 35
STREET Vail Ranch Parkway
FROM Harmony Lane / Terzich Drive TO Redhawk Parkway
Average Daily Traffic 4,429 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/14/2021
Time of Speed Survey 1:50 PM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)35
85th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace Speed 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85
Posted Speed Limit 45
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES + MEDIAN + BIKE LANES
Type of Traffic Control TS @ REDHAWK PKWY, STOP @ HARMONY LN,
Crosswalks?@ TS AND @STOP
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LGIHT
On-Street Parking NONE
Length of Segment 0.590
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility GOOD
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES
Driveways?NONE
Lighting BOTH SIDES + MEDIAN
Width 82
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 225
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 40
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 35 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 36
STREET Via Norte
FROM Solana Way TO Del Rey Road
Average Daily Traffic 849 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2021
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)28
85th Percentile Speed 31
10 mph Pace Speed 24-33
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 91
Posted Speed Limit 30
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ VIA SOLANA WAY, DEL REY RD
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.350
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 120
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 30
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 28 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 37
STREET Via Norte
FROM Del Rey Road TO Calle Pina Colada (N)
Average Daily Traffic 2,092 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 10/21/2021
Time of Speed Survey 11:03 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)32
85th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace Speed 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 30
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ DEL REY RD, CALLE PINA COLADA
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.340
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 104
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 30
UNIFORMITY W/ ADJ. SEG., HIDDEN
DWYS
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 32 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 38
STREET Via Norte
FROM Calle Pina Colada TO Avenida Centenario
Average Daily Traffic 1,720 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/22/2021
Time of Speed Survey 11:41 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33
85th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace Speed 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ CALLE PINA COLADA,
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 1.060
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 104
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 35
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 33 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
CITY OF TEMECULA 39
STREET Via Norte
FROM Avenida Centenario TO Avenida Del Reposo
Average Daily Traffic 852 Date Counted 7/13/2021
Date of Speed Survey 7/22/2021
Time of Speed Survey 10:15 AM
50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)30
85th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace Speed 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit 35
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60
Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00
Number of Lanes 2 LANES
Type of Traffic Control STOP @ AVENIDA DEL REPOSO
Crosswalks?NONE
Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT
Truck Traffic LIGHT
On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES
Length of Segment 0.820
Vertical Curve?YES
Horizontal Curve?YES
Visibility FAIR
Roadway Conditions GOOD
Sidewalks?NONE
Driveways?BOTH SIDES
Lighting NONE
Width 36
Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL
Field Study By BC Checked By NS
CERTIFICATION DATE 11/17/2021
Number of Survey Samples 102
SPEED FACTORS
mph
mph
COLLISION HISTORY
TRAFFIC FACTORS
ROADWAY FACTORS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the
City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly
registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number
TE 2933
Collisions/MVM
years
feet
miles
Recommended Speed Limit 35
CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED
mph
Speed Justification
mph
Average Speed 30 mph
Collisions/MVM
11/17/2021
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms
DATE:07/27/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:11:56AM 1:56PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):DEL REY RD AND AVENIDA CENTENARIO
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:31107 AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 A 50 COUNT WAS UNABLE TO BE ATTAINED
57 0 0 0 AFTER TWO HOURS IN EITHER DIRECTION.ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:27 26 27 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %:24 24 24 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %:21 21 21 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 0 0 0 *10 MPH PACE:19 - 28 21 - 30 19 - 28 M.P.H.
33 0 0 0 *
32 0 0 0 P % IN PACE:97%96%97%
31 0 0 0 A
30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE:0%0%2%
29 X 0 1 1 E
28 X X X 2 1 3 *% UNDER PACE:3%4%2%
27 X X X X X X 5 1 6 *
26 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:24 24 24 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9
24 X X X X X X 2 4 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE:7 6 7
23 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10
22 X X X X 2 2 4 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 2 3 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.23 0.23 0.11
19 X X 1 1 2
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.48 0.34 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 X 1 0 1
15 0 0 0
32 27 59
AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/27/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:1:59PM 3:59PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE AND VIA NORTE
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:40724 AVENIDA CENTENARIO
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 A 50 COUNT WAS UNABLE TO BE ATTAINED
57 0 0 0 AFTER TWO HOURS IN EITHER DIRECTION.ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:29 31 31 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %:28 30 29 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %:26 26 26 M.P.H.
35 X 0 1 1 *
34 X 0 1 1 *10 MPH PACE:23 - 32 23 - 32 23 - 32 M.P.H.
33 X 0 1 1 *
32 X X 0 2 2 P % IN PACE:100%92%95%
31 X X X X X X X X 0 8 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 9 11 C % OVER PACE:0%8%5%
29 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 E
28 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 *% UNDER PACE:0%0%0%
27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X X X 2 2 4 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:27 29 29 M.P.H.
25 X X 1 1 2
24 X X 0 2 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE:3 8 7
23 X X X 1 2 3
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:2 3 3 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.18 0.21 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.46 0.36 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
17 38 55
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
AVENIDA CENTENARIO
DATE:07/20/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:9:40AM 10:40AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD AND RANCHO WAY
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:RANCHO FAMILY MEDICAL GROUP PARKING LOT
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X X X 0 3 3
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X 0 2 2
44 X X X 0 3 3
43 X X X X X 1 4 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X 1 2 3
41 X X X 2 1 3
40 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 85TH %:38 43 40 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 2 2 4
38 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 50TH %:31 32 32 M.P.H.
37 X X X 2 1 3
36 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9 15TH %:27 25 27 M.P.H.
35 X X X 2 1 3 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 *10 MPH PACE:25 - 34 27 - 36 27 - 36 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 3 16 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4 15 P % IN PACE:73%52%63%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 3 17 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 C % OVER PACE:21%31%23%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 E
28 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *% UNDER PACE:6%17%14%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 *
26 X X X 3 0 3 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:32 34 33 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
24 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE:22 59 39
23 X X X X X 3 2 5
22 X X X 1 2 3 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 8 6 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.20 0.71 0.20
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.45 0.84 0.45 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
108 84 192
BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/20/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:10:45AM 11:59AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):RANCHO WAY AND DIAZ RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:43397 BUSINESS PARK DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 0 1 1
48 X X 0 2 2
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X 0 1 1
44 X X 0 2 2
43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X X 0 2 2
40 X X 0 2 2 85TH %:36 40 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 2 2 4
38 X X X X 2 2 4 50TH %:31 33 31 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 3 1 4
36 X X X X X X 4 2 6 15TH %:26 28 27 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 *
34 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 *10 MPH PACE:27 - 36 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 P % IN PACE:73%61%68%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 C % OVER PACE:11%33%23%
29 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *% UNDER PACE:16%6%9%
27 X X X X X X 5 1 6 *
26 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:31 34 32 M.P.H.
25 X X 1 1 2
24 X X X 2 1 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE:22 42 32
23 X 1 0 1
22 X X 1 1 2 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 6 6 M.P.H.
21 X X 2 0 2
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.30 0.82 0.26
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.55 0.91 0.51 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
73 51 124
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
DATE:07/14/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:8:57AM 10:57AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD AND CHAOTE ST
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PENBROOK LN/CHANNEL ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0 THIS STREET SEGMENT WAS VERY SLOW.
57 0 0 0 WE REACHED THE TWO HOUR LIMIT AND ONLY ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0 COLLECTED OVER 50 SAMPLES IN ONE DIRECTION.
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:26 29 27 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %:24 22 23 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %:19 19 19 M.P.H.
35 X 0 1 1 *
34 X 0 1 1 *10 MPH PACE:19 - 28 17 - 26 17 - 26 M.P.H.
33 0 0 0 *
32 X 0 1 1 P % IN PACE:90%79%81%
31 X X X 1 2 3 A
30 X X 0 2 2 C % OVER PACE:6%20%18%
29 X X X X X X 1 5 6 E
28 X 1 0 1 *% UNDER PACE:3%1%1%
27 X X X 1 2 3 *
26 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:23 23 23 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
24 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE:10 19 16
23 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11
22 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9
20 X X X X X X X X X X 1 9 10 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.32 0.27 0.16
19 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10
18 X X X X 1 3 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.56 0.52 0.40 M.P.H.
17 X X X X 0 4 4
16 X 0 1 1
15 0 0 0
31 70 101
CHANNEL STREET
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/15/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 10:48AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):VIA RIO TEMECULA AND TEMECULA PKWY
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:COUNTRY GLEN WAY/BRIARWOOD PL
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 X 1 0 1
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X 0 1 1
40 X X X 1 2 3 85TH %:32 35 35 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %:29 30 29 M.P.H.
37 X X X 1 2 3
36 X X 0 2 2 15TH %:26 24 24 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 *
34 X X X X 2 2 4 *10 MPH PACE:26 - 35 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X 0 5 5 *
32 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 P % IN PACE:80%67%73%
31 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 C % OVER PACE:6%14%10%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 E
28 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 *% UNDER PACE:14%19%17%
27 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *
26 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:29 30 30 M.P.H.
25 X X 0 2 2
24 X X X X 1 3 4 SAMPLE VARIANCE:22 30 26
23 X X 1 1 2
22 X X X X 2 2 4 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 0 1 1
20 X X X X X 3 2 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.42 0.47 0.23
19 X 0 1 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.65 0.69 0.48 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
51 64 115
COUNTRY GLEN WAY
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/21/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:2:15PM 2:38PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):YNEZ RD AND LAKEVIEW RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:MIDDLE OF THE BLOCK BETWEEN YNEZ AND LAKEVIEW
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:50 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X X 1 1 2 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X X X X 2 2 4
53 X X X 3 0 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8
51 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12
50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10 26
49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 15 29
48 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 13 24
47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 12 30
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9 27
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12 25
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17
43 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11
41 X X X X 1 3 4
40 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 85TH %:50 50 50 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 X X X X 3 1 4 50TH %:47 47 47 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 2 2 4
36 X 0 1 1 15TH %:43 42 43 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 0 0 0 *10 MPH PACE:43 - 52 42 - 51 42 - 51 M.P.H.
33 0 0 0 *
32 0 0 0 P % IN PACE:84%85%84%
31 0 0 0 A
30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE:4%5%7%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:11%9%9%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:47 46 47 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:13 13 13
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.10 0.12 0.05
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.31 0.35 0.23 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
140 110 250
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE STREET
DATE:07/21/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:2:45PM 3:13PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):LAKEVIEW RD AND EAST CITY LIMITS
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:TRAFALGAR WAY/DATE ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 1 0 1
50 X X 2 0 2
49 X X 2 0 2
48 X 1 0 1
47 X X 0 2 2
46 X X X X X X X 4 3 7
45 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8
44 X X X X X X 4 2 6
43 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 3 15
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 9 12 85TH %:43 42 43 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6 21 50TH %:37 37 37 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 12 17
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7 19 15TH %:31 31 31 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 *10 MPH PACE:32 - 41 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 P % IN PACE:67%67%65%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 C % OVER PACE:17%25%26%
29 X X X X 2 2 4 E
28 X X X 2 1 3 *% UNDER PACE:16%8%9%
27 X X 1 1 2 *
26 X 1 0 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:37 37 37 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 X X 0 2 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE:30 27 28
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.23 0.25 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.50 0.35 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
127 106 233
DATE STREET
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/27/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:10:45AM 11:50AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):VIA NORTE AND SOLANA WAY
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:29811 DEL REY RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:28 32 31 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 0 1 1 50TH %:25 29 27 M.P.H.
37 X 0 1 1
36 X 0 1 1 15TH %:21 26 23 M.P.H.
35 X 0 1 1 *
34 0 0 0 *10 MPH PACE:21 - 30 24 - 33 23 - 32 M.P.H.
33 X X X 1 2 3 *
32 X X X 0 3 3 P % IN PACE:92%88%82%
31 X X X X X X X X X 0 9 9 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 C % OVER PACE:2%7%6%
29 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *% UNDER PACE:6%5%11%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:25 29 27 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9
24 X X X X X X X 6 1 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE:9 12 14
23 X X X X X X 6 0 6
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 3 4 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X X X 6 1 7
20 X X X X 3 1 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.18 0.22 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.42 0.47 0.36 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
52 56 108
DEL REY ROAD
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/22/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:09AM 10:09AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):SOLANA WAY AND CALLE PINA COLADA (S)
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:30470 DEL REY RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 1 0 1
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:33 31 32 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %:29 28 28 M.P.H.
37 X X 1 1 2
36 X X X X 2 2 4 15TH %:24 24 24 M.P.H.
35 X 1 0 1 *
34 X X X 3 0 3 *10 MPH PACE:23 - 32 23 - 32 23 - 32 M.P.H.
33 X X X X 1 3 4 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 P % IN PACE:79%90%86%
31 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16 C % OVER PACE:17%8%11%
29 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 2 8 10 *% UNDER PACE:4%3%3%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:29 28 28 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 SAMPLE VARIANCE:21 13 16
23 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8
22 X 1 0 1 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.40 0.16 0.12
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.63 0.40 0.35 M.P.H.
17 X 0 1 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
52 80 132
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DEL REY ROAD
DATE:07/21/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 10:00AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):HARVESTON WAY AND FAIRMONT LANE
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:HARVESTON COMMUNITY PARK PARKING LOT
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:32 30 32 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X X 2 0 2 50TH %:27 26 27 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X X X X 2 2 4 15TH %:23 22 23 M.P.H.
35 X X X 2 1 3 *
34 X X X 2 1 3 *10 MPH PACE:23 - 32 22 - 31 22 - 31 M.P.H.
33 X X X X 3 1 4 *
32 X X X X X X 6 0 6 P % IN PACE:74%85%76%
31 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 A
30 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 C % OVER PACE:15%9%17%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 *% UNDER PACE:11%5%7%
27 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:28 27 27 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 SAMPLE VARIANCE:20 15 18
23 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
22 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X X X X 3 1 4
20 X X X X X 3 2 5 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.28 0.27 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.52 0.52 0.37 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
74 55 129
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
HARVESTON DRIVE
DATE:07/21/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:10:04AM 11:04AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):FAIRMONT LANE AND LAKEVIEW RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:CHARLESTON LN/HARVESTON DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:34 31 32 M.P.H.
39 X X 2 0 2
38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %:28 27 27 M.P.H.
37 X X X X 3 1 4
36 X X X X X 4 1 5 15TH %:23 23 23 M.P.H.
35 X X X 2 1 3 *
34 X X X X 3 1 4 *10 MPH PACE:25 - 34 23 - 32 23 - 32 M.P.H.
33 X X 2 0 2 *
32 X X X X X X 4 2 6 P % IN PACE:70%85%76%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 A
30 X X X X X X 4 2 6 C % OVER PACE:15%7%15%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 E
28 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 *% UNDER PACE:15%7%9%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11 25 *
26 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:29 27 28 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7 19
24 X X X X X 0 5 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE:24 15 21
23 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
22 X X 2 0 2 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
20 X X X X 3 1 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.26 0.23 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.48 0.36 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
94 67 161
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
HARVESTON DRIVE
DATE:07/21/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:06AM 12:06PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):LAKEVIEW RD AND HARVESTON SCHOOL RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:NEWPORT RD/HARVESTON DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:31 32 32 M.P.H.
39 X 0 1 1
38 X X 1 1 2 50TH %:25 26 26 M.P.H.
37 X X 0 2 2
36 X X 1 1 2 15TH %:21 23 22 M.P.H.
35 X X X 2 1 3 *
34 X X X 1 2 3 *10 MPH PACE:22 - 31 23 - 32 22 - 31 M.P.H.
33 X 1 0 1 *
32 X X X X X X 2 4 6 P % IN PACE:71%75%72%
31 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 C % OVER PACE:12%14%16%
29 X X X X X X 4 2 6 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 *% UNDER PACE:17%11%12%
27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X 1 10 11 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:26 28 27 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 9 2 11
24 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 SAMPLE VARIANCE:22 22 22
23 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 3 12 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X 5 0 5
20 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.32 0.39 0.18
19 X X X 3 0 3
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.56 0.63 0.42 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
69 56 125
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
HARVESTON DRIVE
DATE:07/15/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:3:17PM 3:43PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):TEMECULA PKWY AND YNEZ RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:44405 LA PAZ ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 X 1 0 1
44 X 1 0 1
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 X X 1 1 2
40 X X X X X 3 2 5 85TH %:36 37 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X 1 3 4
38 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 50TH %:33 32 32 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14
36 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 15TH %:28 29 29 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9 21 *10 MPH PACE:27 - 36 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10 24 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 11 21 P % IN PACE:80%86%82%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10 24 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 C % OVER PACE:15%9%10%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 *% UNDER PACE:5%5%8%
27 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 *
26 X X X 0 3 3 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:33 33 33 M.P.H.
25 X X X X 4 0 4
24 X X 2 0 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE:16 12 14
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.14 0.12 0.07
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.37 0.35 0.26 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
114 102 216
LA PAZ STREET
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/15/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:12:13PM 12:50PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):PECHANGA PKWY AND VIA DEL CORONADO
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:BEECH ST/LOMA LINDA RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X 0 1 1
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 0 0 0
44 X 0 1 1
43 X X X X 2 2 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X X X X X X 0 6 6
40 X X X X X X 1 5 6 85TH %:37 40 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15
38 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 50TH %:33 34 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 15TH %:29 27 29 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 *10 MPH PACE:30 - 39 32 - 41 30 - 39 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10 26 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 P % IN PACE:81%65%72%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 C % OVER PACE:4%6%10%
29 X X X X X X 2 4 6 E
28 X X X X X 4 1 5 *% UNDER PACE:15%29%17%
27 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 *
26 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:33 34 34 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 X X X 1 2 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE:18 30 24
23 X X X X 2 2 4
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.17 0.29 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.42 0.54 0.34 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
104 102 206
LOMA LINDA ROAD
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/28/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:10:30AM 10:48AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):POURROY RD AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:SKYVIEW PARK PARKING LOT AREA
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 X 0 1 1
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X X 2 0 2 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X X X X X 5 0 5
53 X X X 3 0 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X X X X 4 1 5
51 X X X X X 4 1 5
50 X X X X 3 1 4
49 X X X X X X X X 8 0 8
48 X X X X X 5 0 5
47 X X X X X X 4 2 6
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5 16
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15
44 X X X X X 1 4 5
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 12 15
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16 85TH %:51 44 49 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 50TH %:45 40 42 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
36 X X X X X X X X X X X 1 10 11 15TH %:38 36 37 M.P.H.
35 X X X X 1 3 4 *
34 X X X X X X X 1 6 7 *10 MPH PACE:37 - 46 36 - 45 37 - 46 M.P.H.
33 X 0 1 1 *
32 X X X X X 0 5 5 P % IN PACE:60%76%66%
31 X X 1 1 2 A
30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE:36%10%20%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:4%14%14%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:45 40 42 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:30 21 31
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.29 0.19 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.54 0.43 0.38 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
105 111 216
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD
NOT POSTED
DATE:07/21/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:3:25PM 3:53PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):WINCHESTER RD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNY RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:CHILDTIME PARKING LOT
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X 1 0 1
48 X X 2 0 2
47 X X 2 0 2
46 X 1 0 1
45 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16
43 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 3 15
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 13 18 85TH %:44 42 43 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12 27
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9 23 50TH %:39 38 38 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8 22 15TH %:35 34 34 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 14 21 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 *10 MPH PACE:34 - 43 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 *
32 X X X 1 2 3 P % IN PACE:76%84%80%
31 X X X 2 1 3 A
30 X 1 0 1 C % OVER PACE:18%13%17%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:6%3%3%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:39 38 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:17 12 14
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 3 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.14 0.10 0.06
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.37 0.32 0.25 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
121 112 233
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
NICOLAS ROAD
DATE:07/22/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:2:14PM 2:38PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):NORTH GENERAL KEARNY RD AND JOSEPH RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:VIA VANECIA/NICOLAS RD
63 X 1 0 1
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 X X 0 2 2
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 X 0 1 1
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 X X X X X 0 5 5 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X 1 1 2
51 X X X 0 3 3
50 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8
49 X X X X X X X X X 1 8 9
48 X X X X X X X 2 5 7
47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 9 12
46 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 85TH %:45 50 49 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 50TH %:41 45 43 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 4 1 5
36 X X X 3 0 3 15TH %:36 40 38 M.P.H.
35 X X X 1 2 3 *
34 X X 2 0 2 *10 MPH PACE:37 - 46 41 - 50 38 - 47 M.P.H.
33 X X X X 2 2 4 *
32 X X X X X 5 0 5 P % IN PACE:73%68%68%
31 X X 1 1 2 A
30 X X X X 4 0 4 C % OVER PACE:10%13%19%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:17%19%13%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:41 45 43 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:27 30 33
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.26 0.27 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.52 0.39 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
105 108 213
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
NICOLAS ROAD
DATE:07/22/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:2:41PM 3:12PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):JOSEPH RD AND CALLE MEDUSA
65 X 1 0 1
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:RIGHT SHOULDER BETWEEN JOSEPH AND CALLE MEDUSA
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X X 1 1 2
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X X 1 1 2
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X X X X X 2 4 6
51 X X X X 2 2 4
50 X X X X X 0 5 5
49 X X X X X X X 0 7 7
48 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12
47 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12
46 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 15 24 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 85TH %:47 49 48 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12
38 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 50TH %:42 44 43 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8
36 X X X X 3 1 4 15TH %:38 40 39 M.P.H.
35 X X X 2 1 3 *
34 X X X 1 2 3 *10 MPH PACE:37 - 46 41 - 50 39 - 48 M.P.H.
33 X X 2 0 2 *
32 0 0 0 P % IN PACE:74%76%73%
31 X 1 0 1 A
30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE:17%8%13%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:9%16%14%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:42 44 43 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:26 18 23
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.25 0.16 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.50 0.41 0.33 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
103 112 215
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
NICOLAS ROAD
DATE:07/22/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:3:16PM 4:00PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):CALLE MEDUSA AND CALLE GIRASOL
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:RIGHT SHOULDER CALLE MEDUSA AND CALLE GIRASOL
63 X 0 1 1
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 X 0 1 1
55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 X 0 1 1
53 X X 1 1 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8
51 X X 2 0 2
50 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
49 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
48 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8
47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 13 26
46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14
45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 12 24
43 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19
40 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 85TH %:47 49 48 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9
38 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 50TH %:44 45 44 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 2 3 5
36 X X X X 2 2 4 15TH %:38 40 39 M.P.H.
35 X X 2 0 2 *
34 X X 1 1 2 *10 MPH PACE:38 - 47 41 - 50 38 - 47 M.P.H.
33 X 1 0 1 *
32 X X X X X 3 2 5 P % IN PACE:76%73%73%
31 0 0 0 A
30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE:14%11%18%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:10%16%9%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:43 45 44 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:21 25 24
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.20 0.24 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.45 0.49 0.34 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 104 211
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
NICOLAS ROAD
DATE:07/28/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:12:10PM 1:00PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):MARGARITA RD AND CALLE PINA COLADA
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:LA COLIMA RD/NORTH GENERAL KEARNY RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 1 0 1
49 X X X 3 0 3
48 X X X 2 1 3
47 X X 2 0 2
46 X X X 3 0 3
45 X X X X X X X X X 9 0 9
44 X X X X X X 5 1 6
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16
40 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 85TH %:45 41 43 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 50TH %:40 36 38 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 16
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 13 20 15TH %:34 33 33 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 *10 MPH PACE:36 - 45 33 - 42 34 - 43 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 9 11 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 P % IN PACE:66%77%70%
31 X X X X X 2 3 5 A
30 X X X X 1 3 4 C % OVER PACE:11%9%13%
29 X X 0 2 2 E
28 X 0 1 1 *% UNDER PACE:23%14%17%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:40 37 38 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:24 16 22
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.23 0.15 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.39 0.32 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
104 105 209
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD
DATE:07/20/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 9:28AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):TEMECULA PKWY AND SANTIAGO RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:28780 OLD TOWN FRONT ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 X X 2 0 2
49 0 0 0
48 X X X X 3 1 4
47 X X X X X 4 1 5
46 X X X X X 3 2 5
45 X X 2 0 2
44 X X X X X 1 4 5
43 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4 16 85TH %:43 41 42 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 50TH %:38 35 37 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4 16
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 15TH %:34 30 31 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 18 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *10 MPH PACE:33 - 42 29 - 38 32 - 41 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 P % IN PACE:75%72%66%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 0 12 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8 C % OVER PACE:17%25%19%
29 X X X X X X X X X 1 8 9 E
28 X X 1 1 2 *% UNDER PACE:8%3%15%
27 X X X 1 2 3 *
26 X 0 1 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:39 35 37 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE:27 24 28
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.23 0.20 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.44 0.34 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
115 120 235
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
OLD TOWN FRONT STREET
DATE:07/20/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:1:50PM 2:17PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):ENTERPRISE CIRCLE AND JEFFERSON AVE
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:TEMECULA MONTESSORI PARKING LOT
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 X 0 1 1
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X 0 2 2
41 0 0 0
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %:32 31 31 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 X 1 0 1 50TH %:28 27 28 M.P.H.
37 X 1 0 1
36 X X X X X 2 3 5 15TH %:25 24 24 M.P.H.
35 X X 1 1 2 *
34 X X X 2 1 3 *10 MPH PACE:24 - 33 23 - 32 23 - 32 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X 5 1 6 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 P % IN PACE:91%87%87%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6 17 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10 23 C % OVER PACE:6%9%10%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 *% UNDER PACE:3%4%3%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 14 25 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:28 28 28 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 11 21
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 SAMPLE VARIANCE:11 18 15
23 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8
22 X X 1 1 2 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 4 4 M.P.H.
21 X X X 1 2 3
20 X 0 1 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.10 0.17 0.07
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.32 0.42 0.26 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
108 106 214
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
OVERLAND DRIVE
DATE:07/20/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:2:30PM 2:55PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):JEFFERSON AVE AND YNEZ RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:15 FREEWAY OVERPASS
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 X X 2 0 2
48 X X X X X 3 2 5
47 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
46 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
45 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11
44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 10 13
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 16 24 85TH %:46 44 45 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 50TH %:41 40 40 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12
36 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 15TH %:37 34 35 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *
34 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *10 MPH PACE:37 - 46 36 - 45 37 - 46 M.P.H.
33 X X X X 1 3 4 *
32 X X X 1 2 3 P % IN PACE:74%75%74%
31 X X 0 2 2 A
30 X X X 1 2 3 C % OVER PACE:11%5%7%
29 X 0 1 1 E
28 X 0 1 1 *% UNDER PACE:14%20%19%
27 X 0 1 1 *
26 X 0 1 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:41 39 40 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:18 23 21
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.17 0.21 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.41 0.46 0.31 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
105 111 216
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
OVERLAND DRIVE
DATE:07/20/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:3:06PM 3:31PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):YNEZ RD AND MARGARITA RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:OVERLAND CORPORATE CENTER PARKING LOT
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X 0 2 2
44 X 0 1 1
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X 0 5 5
41 X X X X X X 0 6 6
40 X X X X X 0 5 5 85TH %:33 40 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X 1 9 10
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 10 13 50TH %:29 37 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 15 19
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 1 11 12 15TH %:27 33 28 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 0 12 12 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 *10 MPH PACE:25 - 34 32 - 41 29 - 38 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 P % IN PACE:89%87%67%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 0 12 C % OVER PACE:8%8%14%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 0 15 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 0 12 *% UNDER PACE:3%5%19%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 0 15 *
26 X X X X X X X X X 9 0 9 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:30 37 33 M.P.H.
25 X X 2 0 2
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE:11 11 23
23 X X 2 0 2
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 3 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.11 0.10 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.33 0.32 0.33 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 107 214
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
OVERLAND DRIVE
DATE:07/15/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:1:45PM 2:23PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):SOUTH CITY LIMITS AND TEMECULA CREEK INN
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:OPEN SHOULDER
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X X X 2 1 3
40 X X X 0 3 3 85TH %:36 38 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8
38 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 50TH %:33 34 34 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 13 17
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 15TH %:28 30 29 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 16 30 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 14 32 *10 MPH PACE:27 - 36 30 - 39 29 - 38 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8 21 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 P % IN PACE:89%85%84%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 C % OVER PACE:11%5%7%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 *% UNDER PACE:0%10%9%
27 X X X X X X X X X 9 0 9 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:33 34 33 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:11 11 11
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 3 3 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.10 0.10 0.05
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.32 0.32 0.23 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
105 110 215
RAINBOW CANYON ROAD
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/15/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:2:27PM 3:07PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):TEMECULA CREEK INN AND PECHANGA PKWY
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:RAINBOW CANYON RD/BAYHILL DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 0 0 0
48 X 1 0 1
47 X X X 2 1 3
46 X X X X X X 1 5 6
45 X X X X 3 1 4
44 X X X 3 0 3
43 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 9 12
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 13 18 85TH %:41 42 42 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 13 24
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9 22 50TH %:36 39 37 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7 21
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 15TH %:30 34 32 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 *10 MPH PACE:30 - 39 34 - 43 33 - 42 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 *
32 X X X X X X X X 7 1 8 P % IN PACE:70%83%73%
31 X X X X X X 3 3 6 A
30 X X X X X X 6 0 6 C % OVER PACE:20%9%12%
29 X X X X 3 1 4 E
28 X X X 3 0 3 *% UNDER PACE:10%8%15%
27 X X X X X 5 0 5 *
26 X X 2 0 2 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:36 39 37 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:24 17 22
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 4 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.19 0.17 0.10
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.41 0.31 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
128 101 229
RAINBOW CANYON ROAD
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/14/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:1:20PM 1:43PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):VAIL RANCH PKWY AND WOLF VALLEY RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:REDHAWK PKWY/VIA CORDOBA
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 X X 2 0 2
47 0 0 0
46 X X X X 1 3 4
45 X X X X 4 0 4
44 X X X X 0 4 4
43 X X X X X X 5 1 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11
41 X X X X X 2 3 5
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8 20 85TH %:41 41 41 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 50TH %:37 36 37 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 13 29
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 15TH %:33 33 33 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9 23 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 14 21 *10 MPH PACE:32 - 41 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 P % IN PACE:84%80%82%
31 X X X X 1 3 4 A
30 X X X X X X 1 5 6 C % OVER PACE:14%7%9%
29 0 0 0 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:2%13%9%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:37 37 37 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:14 15 14
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.13 0.13 0.06
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.36 0.36 0.25 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
109 116 225
REDHAWK PARKWAY
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/14/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:12:46PM 1:14PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):WOLF VALLEY RD AND PEPPERCORN DR
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:CALLESITO VALLARTA/REDHAWK PKWY
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 1 0 1
46 X 1 0 1
45 X X X 3 0 3
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X X 1 2 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X 3 1 4
41 X X X X 4 0 4
40 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 85TH %:40 38 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 3 13
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 50TH %:35 32 34 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9 23 15TH %:31 29 30 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 6 20 *10 MPH PACE:31 - 40 29 - 38 30 - 39 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 P % IN PACE:78%79%75%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 C % OVER PACE:13%10%12%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X 0 11 11 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 *% UNDER PACE:9%11%13%
27 X X X X 1 3 4 *
26 X X 0 2 2 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:36 33 34 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:18 16 19
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.15 0.15 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.39 0.39 0.29 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
116 105 221
REDHAWK PARKWAY
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/14/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:12:03PM 12:40PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):PEPPERCORN DR AND EL CHIMISAL/TEHACAHPI PASS
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:REDHAWK PKWY/EASTRIDGE PL
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 1 0 1
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X X X X 3 1 4
45 X X 0 2 2
44 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
43 X X 1 1 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X 3 0 3
41 X X X X X X 3 3 6
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 85TH %:40 40 40 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 50TH %:36 35 36 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 15TH %:32 30 31 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12 25 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 *10 MPH PACE:32 - 41 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 P % IN PACE:78%72%75%
31 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 A
30 X X X X X X X 1 6 7 C % OVER PACE:11%9%11%
29 X X X X X X 2 4 6 E
28 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 *% UNDER PACE:12%19%14%
27 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *
26 X X X X 0 4 4 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:36 35 36 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:20 24 23
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.19 0.19 0.10
19 X 0 1 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.44 0.44 0.31 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
103 125 228
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
REDHAWK PARKWAY
DATE:07/14/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:05AM 11:59AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):EL CHIMISAL/TEHACAHPI PASS AND NIGHTHAWK PASS
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:NO ADDRESS IN SEGMENT. OBSERVATION POINT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE BLOCK
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 X X 1 1 2
45 X X 2 0 2
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X X X X 4 0 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X X 2 2 4
41 X X X X X 4 1 5
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 4 16 85TH %:40 39 40 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 50TH %:36 35 36 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 13 29 15TH %:32 30 31 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 *10 MPH PACE:31 - 40 30 - 39 31 - 40 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 11 15 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 P % IN PACE:85%83%82%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 12 17 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 9 11 C % OVER PACE:13%9%9%
29 X X X X X X X 0 7 7 E
28 X X 0 2 2 *% UNDER PACE:2%9%9%
27 X 0 1 1 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:37 35 36 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:13 15 15
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.12 0.13 0.07
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.35 0.36 0.26 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
107 117 224
REDHAWK PARKWAY
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/21/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:12:10PM 2:10PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):VILLAGE RD AND HARVESTON DR
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:YSABEL BARNETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARKING LOT
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:25 24 25 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %:21 21 21 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %:18 19 19 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 0 0 0 *10 MPH PACE:18 - 27 16 - 25 16 - 25 M.P.H.
33 0 0 0 *
32 0 0 0 P % IN PACE:88%89%88%
31 0 0 0 A
30 X 0 1 1 C % OVER PACE:3%11%12%
29 X X 1 1 2 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:9%0%0%
27 X X X X 3 1 4 *
26 X 0 1 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:22 22 22 M.P.H.
25 X X X 3 0 3
24 X X X X X X 1 5 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE:11 10 10
23 X X X 1 2 3
22 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 3 3 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 9 12
20 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.34 0.30 0.16
19 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9
18 X X 2 0 2 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.58 0.55 0.40 M.P.H.
17 X X X 1 2 3
16 X X X X 2 2 4
15 0 0 0
32 35 67
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
TOWNSHIP ROAD
DATE:07/15/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:11AM 12:11PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):LOMA LINDA DR AND CANTERFIELD DR
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:45516 TEMECULA LN
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:NOT POSTED OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:26 25 26 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %:22 23 23 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %:18 19 19 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 0 0 0 *10 MPH PACE:18 - 27 19 - 28 18 - 27 M.P.H.
33 0 0 0 *
32 X 0 1 1 P % IN PACE:91%89%90%
31 0 0 0 A
30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE:4%1%4%
29 0 0 0 E
28 X X X X 2 2 4 *% UNDER PACE:5%10%6%
27 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 *
26 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:22 23 22 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16
24 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 SAMPLE VARIANCE:11 9 10
23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 14 21
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 3 3 M.P.H.
21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14
20 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.20 0.13 0.08
19 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
18 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.45 0.36 0.28 M.P.H.
17 X X X 0 3 3
16 X X 1 1 2
15 X X X 2 1 3
56 73 129
TEMECULA LANE
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/14/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:2:55PM 3:49PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):NIGHTHAWK PASS AND HARMONY LN/TERZICH DR
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:SUNBEAM TRAIL/VAIL RANCH PKWY
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X 0 1 1
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X 1 1 2
44 X X X X X X 2 4 6
43 X X X 0 3 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X 3 3 6
41 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8
40 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 85TH %:39 41 40 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
38 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 50TH %:34 35 35 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9 23 15TH %:31 31 31 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8 21 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 11 30 *10 MPH PACE:30 - 39 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 P % IN PACE:80%78%78%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11 24 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 8 1 9 C % OVER PACE:12%16%11%
29 X X X 2 1 3 E
28 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 *% UNDER PACE:8%7%10%
27 X X X 2 1 3 *
26 X 1 0 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:35 36 35 M.P.H.
25 X X 1 1 2
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:15 20 18
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.11 0.18 0.07
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.34 0.43 0.27 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
133 107 240
VAIL RANCH PARKWAY
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/14/21 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:1:50PM 2:50PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):HARMONY LN/TERZICH DR AND REDHAWK PKWY
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:VALENTINO WAY/VAIL RANCH PKWY
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X X X 3 0 3
45 X X X X 0 4 4
44 X 1 0 1
43 X X X X 1 3 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X 2 1 3
41 X X X X X 5 0 5
40 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 85TH %:39 38 39 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 2 15
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 50TH %:35 34 35 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 5 20
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 15TH %:31 31 31 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 5 21 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12 25 *10 MPH PACE:30 - 39 29 - 38 30 - 39 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12 26 P % IN PACE:86%85%85%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 C % OVER PACE:12%15%12%
29 X X X X X 2 3 5 E
28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:2%0%2%
27 0 0 0 *
26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:35 35 35 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:14 16 15
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.10 0.17 0.07
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.32 0.42 0.26 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
132 93 225
VAIL RANCH PARKWAY
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
DATE:07/27/21 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 10:42AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):SOLANA WAY AND DEL REY RD
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:VIA NORTE/LOS NOGALES RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %:30 32 31 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %:27 29 28 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 X 0 1 1 15TH %:24 25 25 M.P.H.
35 X 0 1 1 *
34 X 0 1 1 *10 MPH PACE:22 - 31 24 - 33 24 - 33 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X 1 5 6 *
32 X X X X X X 1 5 6 P % IN PACE:94%93%91%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16 C % OVER PACE:4%4%3%
29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 E
28 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *% UNDER PACE:2%3%7%
27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 3 14 *
26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:27 29 28 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15
24 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE:10 10 10
23 X X X 2 1 3
22 X X X X 3 1 4 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 3 3 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.19 0.14 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.38 0.29 M.P.H.
17 X 1 0 1
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
52 68 120
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
VIA NORTE
DATE:10/21/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:03AM 12:11PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):DEL REY RD AND CALLE PINA COLADA (N)
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:29400 VIA NORTE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 X X 2 0 2
40 X X 2 0 2 85TH %:36 36 36 M.P.H.
39 X X X 1 2 3
38 X X X X X X 3 3 6 50TH %:33 31 32 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X 2 3 5
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 3 12 15TH %:29 26 27 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 *
34 X X X X X X 4 2 6 *10 MPH PACE:29 - 38 26 - 35 29 - 38 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 2 12 P % IN PACE:77%70%72%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 A
30 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 C % OVER PACE:8%20%6%
29 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 E
28 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *% UNDER PACE:14%11%22%
27 X X X X 2 2 4 *
26 X X X X X X 0 6 6 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:33 31 32 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X 5 1 6
24 X X X 0 3 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE:18 21 20
23 X X 1 1 2
22 X 0 1 1 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 5 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.25 0.37 0.16
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.50 0.61 0.40 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
71 56 127
CARLOS
PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
TO
VIA NORTE
DATE:07/22/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:41AM 12:41PM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):CALLE PINA COLADA AND AVENIDA CENTENARIO
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:30445 VIA NORTE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 X X 0 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 0 1 1
41 X X 1 1 2
40 X 1 0 1 85TH %:36 37 37 M.P.H.
39 X X X 1 2 3
38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %:32 33 33 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X 3 3 6
36 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 15TH %:28 27 28 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 *10 MPH PACE:28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H.
33 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 *
32 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 P % IN PACE:80%70%75%
31 X X X X X X 3 3 6 A
30 X X X X X X 4 2 6 C % OVER PACE:10%13%12%
29 X X X X X X 3 3 6 E
28 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 *% UNDER PACE:10%17%13%
27 X X X 1 2 3 *
26 X X X X 1 3 4 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:32 33 33 M.P.H.
25 X X X 1 2 3
24 X X 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE:17 25 21
23 X 0 1 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X 1 0 1
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.33 0.46 0.20
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.58 0.68 0.45 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
51 53 104
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
VIA NORTE
DATE:07/22/21 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:10:15AM 11:36AM
FOR ROADWAY:
SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):AVENIDA CENTENARIO AND AVENIDA DEL REPOSO
65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:CALLE TIARA/VIA NORTE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 1 0 1
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X 1 0 1
41 X 0 1 1
40 X 0 1 1 85TH %:35 35 35 M.P.H.
39 X 1 0 1
38 X X X 1 2 3 50TH %:30 30 30 M.P.H.
37 X X 0 2 2
36 X X X X X 3 2 5 15TH %:25 26 25 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 *
34 X X X X X 3 2 5 *10 MPH PACE:27 - 36 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H.
33 X X 1 1 2 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 P % IN PACE:75%71%71%
31 X X X X X X 4 2 6 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 C % OVER PACE:8%16%15%
29 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 E
28 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *% UNDER PACE:18%14%15%
27 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 *
26 X X X X X X 1 5 6 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:31 30 30 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X 2 3 5
24 X X 0 2 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE:26 21 24
23 X X X X 3 1 4
22 X X X 2 1 3 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.42 0.23
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.72 0.65 0.48 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
51 51 102
RADAR
CITY OF TEMECULA
CARLOS
SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
TO
VIA NORTE
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
APPENDIX C
Survey Equipment
2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
City of Temecula
SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED
The radar equipment used by City Traffic Counters to collect speed measurements for
this survey was a Stalker-II SDR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar and a Stalker-ATR
Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar both manufactured by Applied Concepts of Plano,
Texas. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements
were taken. Tests of the units were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's
specifications. The Stalker-II SDR Hand-Held Traffic Radar and Stalker-ATR Model
Hand-Held Traffic Radar were last calibrated on January 15, 2019 by RHF Inc.
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
California
Highway Patrol
Temecula Area
Report for October 2021
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
Services Provided
•10 child safety seats
installed
•2 Start Smart Classes
•5 Community Event Safety
Booths
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC
Enforcement Activity
•Citations Issued –370
•Total Enforcement Contacts –
737
•Special Enforcement Detail
Oct 19th with San Diego and
Oceanside CHP on I-15
•Special Enforcement Detail
scheduled November 15th
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
Driving Under the
Influence
•Monthly Arrests –40
•Monthly Drug DUI arrests –6
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC
BY ND
Traffic Collisions
•Non-Injury –82
•Injury –57
•Fatal –2
•Fatal Year to Date -20
•Total Collisions –139
•DUI Crashes –13 (out of 40 DUI
arrests)
Fatal Traffic Collisions /
Major Investigations
•22350 Corte Bonita
•S/B I-15 s/of Clinton Keith
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
City of Temecula Fire Department
Incident Type
Commercial Fire 0
False Alarms 104
Haz Mat 1
Medical 617
Multi-Fam 0
Other Fire 7
Other Misc 5
Public Assist 34
Residential Fire 3
Rescue 3
Ringing Alarm 0
Standby 8
Traffic Collision 75
Wildland/Vehicle Fire 7
Total 864
Temecula Fire Department Service Calls
October 2021
City of Temecula Fire Department
Temecula Fire Department
Plan Review and Inspections
October 2021
Plan Review and Inspections October Year to Date
Plan Review 544 4200
Construction Inspections 381 3661
Annual Inspections 470 5796
Counter/Public Inquiries 24 114
City of Temecula Fire Department
Temecula Fire Department
Spark of Love Toy Drive
https://temeculaca.gov/252/Spark-of-Love-Toy -Drive
Created by: Deputy R. Hernandez #2680 Southwest Station Traffic Division
City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report
Temecula Traffic Incidents, Activities and Events Report for the month of October 2021
Created by: Deputy R. Hernandez #2680 Southwest Station Traffic Division
City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report
Total Hazardous Citations 924
Total Non-Hazardous Citations 163
(Seatbelt cites included) 10
(Cell phone cites included) 116
Parking Citations 167
Total Citations Issued 1254
Written Warnings Issued 351
City Funded Targeted Enforcement
(S.L.A.P. Cite included) 97
(Commercial Enforcement Cites included) 26
Created by: Deputy R. Hernandez #2680 Southwest Station Traffic Division
City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report
D.U.I. Arrests 42
D.U.I. Arrests YTD 376
D.U.I. Previous Year 237
OTS/City Funded Special Operations
DUI Checkpoints 0
Know Your Limit Campaign 0
DUI Sweep 0
Targeted Traffic Enforcement Saturation 0
Created by: Deputy R. Hernandez #2680 Southwest Station Traffic Division
City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report
2021 – Citations / Incidents Aug Sept Oct 3 Month Total
Citations Issued for Hazardous Violations (Moving Viol.) 878 635 930 2443
Non-Hazardous Citations 120 109 163 392
“Click It or Ticket” and/or Seatbelt Violations 5 2 10 17
Distracted Driver (Cell Phone Use) 119 95 116 330
Parking Citations 192 190 167 549
Written Warning Citations 356 281 351 988
Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program (SLAP) Red Light 100 37 97 234
Commercial Enforcement Cites 19 21 26 66
Injury Collisions 19 32 19 70
DUI Arrests 38 24 42 104
Created by: Deputy R. Hernandez #2680 Southwest Station Traffic Division
Jurisdiction
Violent
Crime Homicide
Sexual
Assaults Robbery Aggravated
Assault
Property
Crime Burglary
Vehicle
Theft
Larceny/
Theft Arson
Total Pt 1
Crimes
Violent Crime = homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault totals combined
Property Crime = burglary, vehicle theft, larceny-theft totals combined
City of Temecula/Southwest Station Uniform Crime Report (September 2021)
Southwest 6 0 0 0 6 82 10 12 60 1 89
Temecula 39 0 2 8 29 83 15 25 43 0 122
MEMORANDUM
TO: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Manager
DATE: October 1, 2021
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report – September 2021
The Street Maintenance Division performed the following activities for the month of September 2021:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 9
B. Total signs installed 13
C. Total signs repaired 43
D. Banners Replaced 3
II. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 6
III. ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs 226
B. Total Tons 1.5
IV. CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned 141
B. Down Spouts 0
C. Under sidewalks 0
D. Bowls 0
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 200
VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations 27
B. Total S.F. 1232
VII. STENCILING
A. 396 New and Repainted Legends
B. 9776 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
C. 6145 Bull Nose – L.F.
D. 0 Thermal Plastic
E. 0 RPMs Installed
City Maintenance staff responded to 63 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,
tree trimming, sign repair, HVAC failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to
67 service order requests for the month of August 2021.
City Maintenance staff also responded to 11 service order requests for street light outages
and maintenance. This is compared to 14 street light-related service order requests for the
month of August 2021.
The Maintenance Crew put in 54 hours of overtime, which includes stand-by time, special
events and response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by external contractors for the month of September
2021 was $ 95,152.00 ; compared to $ 22,292.00 for the month of August 2021.
Account No. 5401 $______85,902.00_ __
Account No. 5402 $______9,250.00_____
Account No. 999-5401 $__________________
Account No. 999-5402 $__________________
Electronic Copies:
Pat Thomas, City Engineer Director of Public Works
Amer Attar, Engineer Manager Capital Improvements
Ron Moreno, Principal Civil Engineer Land Development
Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Manager Public Works
Julie Tarrant, Sr. Management Analyst Capital Improvements
Nick Minicilli, Senior Civil Engineer Traffic Division
Tammy Petricka, Administrative Assistant Public Works
Anissa Sharp, Office Specialist II Land Development
Jenny McConville, Senior Office Specialist Public Works
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of September 2021
DATE
ACCOUNT
STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE
DESCRIPTION
OF WORK
TOTAL COST
SIZE
CONTRACTOR: NPG Asphalt
Date: 9/24/21
# 1120216
Colina Verde
Replaced damaged asphalt and concrete
TOTAL COST
$50,795.00
Date: 9/17/21
# 1120223
Pauba @ La Primavera
Replaced damaged asphalt
TOTAL COST $28,765.00
Date:
#
TOTAL COST
Date:
#
TOTAL COST
CONTRACTOR: West Coast Arborists, Inc.
Date: 9/15/21
# 177249
Citywide Annual ROW tree pruning
TOTAL COST
$4,450.00
Date: 9/15/21
# 177908
Citywide Annual ROW tree pruning
TOTAL COST $1,892.00
CONTRACTOR: Rene’s Commercial Management
Date: 9/23/21
# 34-12
Citywide
Post emergent spraying of city-maintained channels
TOTAL COST
$9,250.00
Date:
#
TOTAL COST
TOTAL COST FOR ACCOUNT #5401 $_______85,902.00_______
TOTAL COST FOR ACCOUNT #5402 $_____ __9,250.00________
TOTAL COST FOR ACCOUNT #99-5401 $______________________
TOTAL COST FOR ACCOUNT #99-5402 $______________________
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSDate Submitted: September 1, 2021MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORTSubmitted By: Patrick ThomasSTREET MAINTENANCE DIVISIONPrepared By: Rodney Tidwell1ST QUARTERSCOPE OF WORK Unit CostWORK COMPLETEDCOSTWORK COMPLETEDCOSTWORK COMPLETEDCOSTWORKCOMPLETEDCOSTTOTAL COST FOR LAST FISCAL YEAR 1st QuarterASPHALT REPAIRSSquare Footage: $3.47 1,1003,817.00$ 1,7986,239.06$ 226784.22$ 1,10010,840.28$ 7,104.24$ Tons: 23 12 1.5 23Parking Lot Slurry Seal Square Footage:Gallons:PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETESquare Footage: $3.47 0-$ 0-$ 0-$ 0-$ PCC Yards: 0 0 0 0STENCILINGRed curb & Striping (linear feet): $0.11 8,276910.36$ 14,1511,556.61$ 9,7761,075.36$ 8,2763,542.33$ 19.74$ New & Repainted Legends (each): $9.00 8918,019.00$ 8197,371.00$ 3963,564.00$ 89118,954.00$ 5,912.00$ Bull Noses (linear feet): $0.11 0-$ 0-$ 6,145675.95$ 6,145675.95$ Raised Pavement Markers-RPM's (each): 4 0 0 440Thermo Plastic Legends (each): 1 0 0 1118SIGNS & BANNERSNo. of Signs REPLACED: $28.31 25707.75$ 10283.10$ 9254.79$ 251,245.64$ 2,480.66$ Material (cost per sign): $50.001,250.00$ 500.00$ 450.00$ 2,200.00$ 4,700.00$ No. of Signs INSTALLED: $28.31 4113.24$ 12339.72$ 13368.03$ 4820.99$ 1,557.01$ Material (cost per sign): $50.00200.00$ 600.00$ 650.00$ 1,450.00$ 2,950.00$ No. of Signs REPAIRED: $28.31 19537.89$ 22622.82$ 431,217.33$ 192,378.04$ 1,794.52$ Material (cost per sign): $50.00950.00$ 1,100.00$ 2,150.00$ 4,200.00$ 3,400.00$ No. of BANNERS installed: $28.31 13368.03$ 0-$ 384.93$ 13452.96$ 4,459.91$ 0-$ 0-$ 0-$ 0-$ -$ GRAFFITI REMOVALNo. of Locations: 22 37 27 22Square Footage: 1,943 2,985 1,232 1,943DRAINAGE FACILITIES CLEANEDCatch Basins: $28.31 1734,897.63$ 902,547.90$ 1413,991.71$ 17311,437.24$ 844.48$ Down Drains: $28.31 0-$ 0-$ 0-$ -$ Under sidewalk Drains $28.31 0-$ 0-$ 0-$ -$ 26.39$ Detention Basins/Bowls: $28.31 0-$ 0-$ 0-$ -$ Bridge Deck Drains: $28.31 0-$ 0-$ 0-$ -$ TREES TRIMMEDNo. of Trees Trimmed: $28.31 381,075.78$ 15424.65$ 6169.86$ 381,670.29$ 527.80$ R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENTArea Abated (square feet): $0.090 25022.50$ 22,9102,061.90$ 20018.00$ 2502,102.40$ 112.54$ The Street Maintenance Division also responds to service requests. The total number of Service Order Requests, some of which include work reported above, is reported monthly.SERVICE ORDER REQUESTSNo. of SOR's: 72 67 63 72Personnel assigned to the Street Maintenance Division are on-call and respond to after hours emergencies or to support City-sponsored special events.Overtime Hours: $39.59 1024,038.18$ 763,008.84$ 542,137.86$ 1029,184.88$ 9,501.60$ TOTALS: 12,956 26,907.36$ 43,004 26,655.60$ 18,336 16,813.16$ 19,101 71,155.00$ 45,364.50$ Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 FISCAL YEAR TO DATEFISCAL YEAR 2021 - 2022R:\MAINTAIN\MOACRPT\JULY.AUG.SEPT.
Month Number
of Calls
Square
Footage
Jul 22 1,943
Aug 37 2,985
Sep 27 1,232
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Totals 86 6,160
CITY OF TEMECULA
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
FISCAL YEAR 2018 - 2019
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun No. of CallsSquare FeetSquare
Footage
Number
of Calls
MEMORANDUM
TO: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Manager
DATE: November 1, 2021
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report – October 2021
The Street Maintenance Division performed the following activities for the month of October 2021:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 81
B. Total signs installed 0
C. Total signs repaired 9
D. Banners Replaced 136
II. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 3
III. ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs 1255
B. Total Tons 18
IV. CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned 282
B. Down Spouts 4
C. Under sidewalks 71
D. Bowls 0
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 0
VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations 24
B. Total S.F. 1568
VII. STENCILING
A. 0 New and Repainted Legends
B. 1 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
C. 3328 Bull Nose – L.F.
D. 29 Thermal Plastic
E. 0 RPMs Installed
City Maintenance staff responded to 102 service order requests ranging from weed
abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, HVAC failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is
compared to 63 service order requests for the month of September 2021.
City Maintenance staff also responded to 6 service order requests for street light outages
and maintenance. This is compared to 11 street light-related service order requests for the
month of September 2021.
The Maintenance Crew put in 64 hours of overtime, which includes stand-by time, special
events and response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by external contractors for the month of October 2021
was $ 241,357.37 ; compared to $ 95,152.00 for the month of September 2021.
Account No. 5401 $__________________
Account No. 5402 $____1,269.00_______
Account No. 999-5401 $__________________
Account No. 999-5402 $_____42,250.00_____
Account No. 999-5410 $_____197,838.37____
Electronic Copies:
Pat Thomas, City Engineer Director of Public Works
Amer Attar, Engineering Manager Capital Improvements
Ron Moreno, Principal Civil Engineer Land Development
Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Manager Public Works
Julie Tarrant, Sr. Management Analyst Capital Improvements
Nick Minicilli, Senior Civil Engineer Traffic Division
Tammy Petricka, Administrative Assistant Public Works
Anissa Sharp, Office Specialist II Land Development
Jenny McConville, Senior Office Specialist Public Works
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of October 2021
DATE
ACCOUNT
STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE
DESCRIPTION
OF WORK
TOTAL COST
SIZE
CONTRACTOR: West Coast Arborists, Inc.
Date: 10/15/2021
# 178497
Citywide
Annual ROW tree trimming
TOTAL COST
$1,144.00
Date: 10/31/2021
# 179052
Citywide
Annual ROW tree trimming
TOTAL COST
$1,155.00
Date:
#
TOTAL COST
Date:
#
TOTAL COST
CONTRACTOR: NPG Asphalt, Inc.
Date: 9/29/2021
# 1120260
Rainbow Canyon Road
Removed and replaced damaged asphalt
TOTAL COST
$42, 280.00
Date:
#
TOTAL COST
CONTRACTOR: Pacific Striping
Date: 10/11/2021
# 33
Citywide
Biannual citywide traffic striping
TOTAL COST
$197,838.37
Date:
#
TOTAL COST
TOTAL COST FOR ACCOUNT #5401 $______________________
TOTAL COST FOR ACCOUNT #5402 $_______1,269.00________
TOTAL COST FOR ACCOUNT #99-5410 $_______197,838.37______
TOTAL COST FOR ACCOUNT #99-5402 $_______42,250.00_______
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSDate Submitted: November 1, 2021MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORTSubmitted By: Patrick ThomasSTREET MAINTENANCE DIVISIONPrepared By: Rodney Tidwell2ND QUARTERSCOPE OF WORK Unit CostWORK COMPLETEDCOSTWORK COMPLETEDCOSTWORK COMPLETEDCOSTWORKCOMPLETEDCOSTTOTAL COST FOR LAST FISCAL YEARASPHALT CONCRETE:Square Footage: $3.47 1,2554,354.85$ -$ -$ 2,35515,195.13$ -$ Tons: 1841Parking Lot Slurry Seal Square Footage:Gallons:PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE:Square Footage: $3.47 0-$ -$ -$ 0-$ -$ PCC Yards:0-$ STENCILING:Red curb & Striping (linear feet): $0.11 10.11$ -$ -$ 8,2773,542.44$ -$ New & Repainted Legends (each): $9.00 0-$ -$ -$ 89118,954.00$ -$ Bull Noses (linear feet): $0.11 3,328366.08$ -$ -$ 9,4731,042.03$ -$ Raised Pavement Markers-RPM's (each): 04Thermo Plastic Legends (each): 2930 SIGNS & BANNERS:No. of Signs REPLACED: $28.31 812,293.11$ -$ 1063,538.75$ -$ Material (cost per sign): $50.004,050.00$ -$ 6,250.00$ -$ No. of Signs INSTALLED: $28.31 0-$ -$ 4820.99$ -$ Material (cost per sign): $50.00-$ -$ 1,450.00$ -$ No. of Signs REPAIRED: $28.31 9254.79$ -$ 282,632.83$ -$ Material (cost per sign): $50.00450.00$ -$ 4,650.00$ -$ No. of BANNERS installed: $28.31 1363,850.16$ -$ 1494,303.12$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 0-$ -$ GRAFFITI REMOVAL:No. of Locations: 2446Square Footage: 1,5683,511DRAINAGE FACILITIES CLEANED:Catch Basins: $28.31 2827,983.42$ -$ -$ 45519,420.66$ -$ Down Drains (down spouts): $28.31 4113.24$ -$ -$ 4113.24$ -$ Under sidewalk Drains $28.31 712,010.01$ -$ -$ 712,010.01$ -$ Detention Basins (bowls): $28.31 0-$ -$ -$ 0-$ -$ Bridge Deck Drains: $28.31-$ -$ -$ Channels: $28.31-$ -$ -$ TREES:No. of Trees Trimmed: $28.31 384.93$ -$ -$ 411,755.22$ -$ R.O.W. WEED ABATEMENT:Area Abated (square feet): $0.090 0-$ -$ 0-$ 2502,102.40$ -$ The Street Maintenance Division also responds to service requests for a variety of other reasons, the total number of Service Order Requests, some of which include work reported above is reported monthly.SERVICE ORDER REQUESTSNo. of SOR's: 102174Personnel assigned to the Street Maintenance Division are on-call and respond to after hours emergencies or support City sponsored special eventsOvertime Hours: $39.59 642,533.76$ -$ -$ 16611,718.64$ -$ TOTALS: $28,344.46 $0.00 $0.00 26,076 $99,499.46-$ FISCAL YEAR 2021 - 2022Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 FISCAL YEAR TO DATER:\MAINTAIN\MOACRPT\JULY.AUG.SEPT.
MonthNumberof CallsSquareFootageJul 22 1,943Aug 37 2,985Sep 27 1,232Oct 24 1,568NovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunTotals 110 7,728CITY OF TEMECULAGRAFFITI REMOVALFISCAL YEAR 2021 - 2022DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION051015202530354005001,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,500Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunNo. of CallsSquare FeetSquareFootageNumberof Calls