Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout031390 CC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MARCH 13, 1990 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:04 PM in the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding. PRESENT 5 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Frank Aleshire, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Mike Rogers of New Covenant Fellowship. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Pat Birdsall. ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC COMMENTS Steve Bolt, Owner of Omega Advertising, 28127 Front Street, addressed the City Council regarding the upcoming Merchant Exposition to be held April 6, 7, and 8, 1990. He invited the members of the City Council to participate as booth judges and also to man an information booth at high traffic times to address questions and relay information on the City's progress. Minutes 3/13/90 I Leigh Engdahl, representing the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors spoke regarding the Business License Fee. She reported that the Chamber Board recommended that the adoption of such a tax is premature at this time. The Chamber encouraged the City Council to establish an Ad Hoc Committee to determine the need for such a tax, the benefit to local business, the presence of existing legislation, the enforcement cost, and the best way to meet the City's objectives and match the benefits to the expense. Jeff Cuny, 30080 Corte Cantera, spoke regarding the development of the area as it affects the schools, particularly in the area of the Costain Signet Homes Tract. Gary G. Burg, 30219 Corte Cantera, also a resident of the Costain Homes Tract stated that the City needs to look at the high density projects in the immediate vicinity of his tract. He feels parks and open space are important needs of the residents in both existing and future housing within that area. Jerry Guzzetta, 29916 Ave. Cima del Sol, addressed the Council and questioned the number of apartment units currently existing in the City. He also asked if the City knew what the occupancy rate is in those existing apartments. Mr. Guzzetta asked if there is a formula used to determine the need for additional apartment development and he stressed the need for more parks development. RECF~S Mayor Parks declared a recess at 7:17 PM to allow staff to set up additional chairs to accommodate the large audience. The meeting was reconvened at 7:20 PM. CONSENT CAI,ENDAR It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve the Consent Calendar items as follows: 1. Minutes 1.1 Approved minutes of February 13, 1990 as mailed. Minutes 3/13/90 2 l~,blic Use Permit 679 - Trinity Chri~ian Church 2.1 Received and Filed Notice of Decision (Riverside County Planning Commission). Resolntion Approving Payment of Demandn 3.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TFAVIF~ULA APPROVING THE WARRANT REGISTER DATED MARCH 13, 1990. Resolution Deqyin_~ Plot Plan No. 1168 4.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLOT PLAN NO. 1168 TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAY NEAR RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND FRONT STREET. The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Mufioz, Parks C OUNCILMEMBERS: None C OUNCILMEMBERS: None Minutes 3/13/90 3 COUNCIl J F~USINFSS 5. Parcel Map .~34:~6 and Tract ~3160 City Manager Aleshire explained that this item had been acted upon at the previous meeting but that the developer had agreed to return to this Council meeting to more fully describe the project for the Councilmembers. Nick Tavaglione, the developer described the project using several renderings. He stated the project will contain 130 units on 10 acres. He listed some to the amenities such as pools, spas, tot lots and green belts. This will be a condominium development and it is currently sold out. In response to questions from Councilmember Mufioz, he stated that 20% of the units are reserved by investors, the remainder are by private individuals. He also answered that the development has been assessed $250,t300. in fees for schools. Mr. Tavaglione requested that the City Council not adopt a negative attitude about developers. He said that the community had been developed thus far by developers and that it is their desire to continue to assist in an orderly and attractive development of the City of Temecula. 6. Report from City of Temeoda Traffic Committee City Manager Aleshire introduced Sergeant Ron Roberts who addressed the City Council giving the short-term recommendations of the committee. He advised the Council that the committee recommends the following: Hiring non-sworn employees to provide traffic direction at the following locations during peak traffic hours: Winchester Road at the southbound 1-15 off-ramp. Winchester Road at the northbound 1-15 off-ramp. Winchester Road at Ynez Road. Rancho California Road at the southbound 1-15 off-ramp. Rancho California Road at the northbound 1-15 off-ramp. Minutes 3/13/90 4 - 2. To make the following roadway modifications at Winchester Road: Be ao Create an additional westbound traffic lane on Winchester Road from Ynez Road to west of the 1-15. Post anti-gridlock warning signs on Winchester Road at Jefferson Avenue. To make the following roadway modifications at Rancho California Road: Lengthen the left turn 1-15 freeway access lanes on Rancho California Road. Post anti-gridlock warning signs on Rancho California Road. Sgt. Roberts outlined the costs contained in the report and the suggested funding recommendations. He advised that a CalTrans Encroachment Permit will be required prior to implementation of the traffic control program. Councilmember Mufioz commended the committee on the report and asked how long it might take to get the encroachment permit. Sgt. Roberts answered that the committee has been working through Senator Bergeson's office and they feel it can be expedited within a matter of weeks. Councilmember Lindemans questioned if the figures in the report included insurance coverage for the traffic directors. Sgt. Roberts responded that the figures include employer contributions for Workers Compensation and FICA deductions. Councilmember Lindemans also asked if the Chamber of Commerce has committed to the voluntary contribution program suggested in the report on page 5. Councilmember Birdsall asked if this would be a tax-free contribution from the Chamber members. City Manager Aleshire said the staff will research that matter and advise the Council. Chuck Collins, of the Advisory Committee, reported on the freeway interchanges and bridges and the construction timetables for their completion. He gave a brief background on the status of the overpasses at Rancho California and Winchester Roads and discussed the circulation infrastructure for the surface roads within the City. Knox Johnson, a member of the Advisory Committee, presented the committee's traffic survey results. This survey of 44 local companies and compiled the number of employee trips generated per day between the hours of 6:00 AM and 6:00 PM. He advised the Minutes 3/13/90 5 Council that the committee had also compiled the average daily trips (ADT) for Rancho California Road at the 1-15 at 29,920 per 24-hour period, Winchester Road at 1-15 at 28,855 per 24-hour period and Winchester Road at Ynez, at 17,000 per 24 hour period. Councilmember Mufioz inquired if the data suggested that staggered work hours would help. Mr. Johnson responded that it would be a real task to convince employers to change their business hours and it would require not only a major public relations effort but also coordination among the various employers to make it work. Greg Erickson, representing Bedford Properties, 28765 Single Oak Drive, spoke in favor of the use of the Civilian Traffic Control Officers and said Bedford Properties will contribute the sum of $10,000 to assist with the program. Mayor Parks questioned the reason for the program being budgeted on a monthly basis. Sgt. Roberts answered that it will probably take two months to fully implement the program and therefore funding should be for a period of six to seven months. Councilmember Lindemans questioned who would be supervising the project. Sgt. Roberts replied that this would be up to the Temecula City Council. Councilmember Mufioz asked if the committee would be willing to continue with the program and assist in the hiring of the employees and in the implementation. Sgt. Roberts said the committee would be happy to continue in this role. Councilmember Birdsall asked what the cost of training would be? Sgt. Roberts stated that an exact figure had not been developed, but the training will be based on the CHP's training program and the cost should be minimal. Mayor Parks congratulated the committee on the report and thanked the members for their individual efforts. Councilmember Mufioz stated he would like to have the program go forth at once and he also commended Bedford Properties for their offer of support. Mayor Parks said he would like to see the City Staff prepare a resolution adopting this program. He also recommended that the City provide matching funds to those made by the business community and public. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to direct City staff to prepare an appropriate resolution. Minutes 3/13/90 6 Councilmember Birdsall also suggested that Sgt. Roberts be authorized to proceed with obtaining the needed encroachment permit. City Manager F. D. Aleshire advised that he would be meeting with CalTrans in two days and would address the permit at that time. The motion was unanimously carded. RECFSS The mayor declared a recess at 8:00 PM, to be reconvened to a Community Service District Meeting. The meeting was reconvened at 8:30 PM with all members present. COUNCIL BUS1NESS (Continued) 7. CUP-3076 Anto Dealership on West Side of Ynezo Sonth of Winchester City Manager Aleshire advised the Council that this matter be set for Public Heating in two weeks. Keith Andrews, the applicant requested that the Council make a decision at this meeting if possible. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to set a public heating for two week or as soon as possible thereafter. The motion was unanimously carried. llnd_~et for the Seven Months Ending June 30, 1990 City Manager Aleshire introduced Mary Jane Henry, the Interim Finance Director who presented a staff report which pointed out the estimated revenues and expenditures for FY 89-90. Councilmember Lindemans questioned the location in the budget of an allocation for computers for the Planning Department. Ms. Henry answered that the allocation is in Exhibit 4 listed under Community Development. Minutes 3/13/90 7 Councilmember Lindemans also asked about the language in Sections 4 and 5 of the resolution. He questioned authorizing overexpenditure in individual budget accounts, and the authorization of the City Manager to transfer between budget categories. Mayor Parks questioned the methods used to compute the figures used in the department allocations. Ms. Henry responded that a combination of actual to-date expenditures and estimates prepared by the staff were used. Councilmember Birdsall questioned if part of the Transient Occupancy Tax should be allocated for promotion of the City. City Manager Aleshire advised that a separate account for promotions could be set up within the budget if this is the City Council's direction. He commented on Sections 4 and 5 of the resolution, stating that this is standard practice in municipalities. He advised that the total budget amount in any given program area can not be exceeded without the City Council's approval. Councilmember Birdsall said she felt it would be much too time consuming for the Council to perform individual reconsideration each time a budget transfer of funds between departments needed to take place. Councilmember Moore stated that she feels accountability is included in the budget and to remove Sections 4 and 5 from the Resolution would cause unnecessary delays in the City's day to day operations. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to remove Sections 4 and 5 of the resolution and adopt Resolution No. 90-26. The motion was defeated by the following roll call vote: AYES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz NOES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adopt Resolution No. 90-26. Minutes 3/13/90 8 The motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Parks NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Mufioz stated that he feels the Council needs to have more information regarding the expenditures being made by City staff. Councilmember Lindemans asked that a budget be prepared to begin July 1, 1990. 9. CDBG Funds - Sam Hicks Park City Manager Aleshire presented a report and application for CDBG funds. He said the County is proposing a joint project whereby the County will appropriate $60,000 from 89- 90 funds for park improvements and the City will commit a like amount from the Temecula CDBG budget for FY 90-91. Jim Tebbets, representing the County of Riverside Community Development Department gave a staff report explaining the proposed improvements which include 1) curbs and gutters, sidewalks, pavement and street lights along Moreno Road and Mercedes Street; 2) construction of a parldng lot to serve the park, fire station and museum; 3) providing an access way from the street to the park playground area. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to authorize the City Manager to sign the application for funds on behalf of the City. The motion was unanimously carried. 10. Resoh~tion of Intent - Me!1o Roos Di~rict CFD-88-1~ City Manager F. D. Aleshire advised the City Council regarding the status of the negotiations and the and the basic features of the agreement which would allow the March 23rd election of the property owners to proceed. He stated that the complete right-of-way on Ynez can not be acquired to the full 134 feet. He also advised that specific costs will not be known until the right-of-way costs have been determined. He stated that the City Attorney has prepared an amended copy of the Resolution of Intention. Minutea 3/13/90 9 Councilmember Moore asked the reason for the Council receiving two copies of the suggested resolution. City Attorney Scott Field explained that one copy is a "red line" version to show the changes that have been made since the previous draft and the other copy is a "clean" copy. Councilmember Lindemans questioned the inclusion of the mitigation fees in Section 9 of the resolution. The City Attorney advised that for the developments on Ynez Rd. Two lanes would be the City's responsibility, and four lanes would be the developer's responsibility. In the case of property north of Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Bedford Properties has agreed to pay for the entire construction of six lanes. They will then be eligible for a credit against future traffic impact fees. Mayor Parks stated that the City has not adopted impact fees and he does not feel the City Council agreed to grant any credit. Councilmember Mufioz stated that the City should not be held responsible for development of the fifth and sixth lanes since the need for six lanes is due to traffic which will be generated by the development of the area. Councilmember Lindemans said he wished to reiterate for the record that he is not opposed to this Mello Roos in its entirety if the developers pay all of the costs, with the possible exception of the Performing Arts Center. Councilmember Mufioz questioned why the 10 year limitation on sales tax reimbursement was changed. Mayor Parks responded that this was the result of the Council agreement to pay their fair share of the costs. Mr. Mufioz also questioned section (c) on page 14 regarding reimbursing owners of property within the district any amounts which they have advanced to the County for payment of costs and expenses incurred in the establishment of the district. He asked if the dollar amount is known and whether the City should be reimbursing for these costs. Mayor Parks questioned if the language should be changed with regard to Page 8, subsection (1), referring to how the sales tax will be disbursed to the currently developed properties who pay sales tax. He stated there are properties who generate jobs which should be accommodated in this agreement. Scott Field advised that the fair share of the reimbursement for Ynez will not be known until the engineers have determined the costs of the widening. He explained that this document reflects the basic philosophy that the City will pay for the last two lanes on Ynez and the developers will pay for the other four. He also advised that final agreements will be more detailed when they are completed. Minutes 3/13/90 10 Lisa Peterson, representing Bedford Properties, made comments outlining the areas of disagreement the property owners have as follows: 1) Tax reimbursement should not be based on the County lowering the $60,000,000 limit of the district to some other figure. She stated the owners have no objection to the City asking the County to do this but they do not like having this as a condition. 2) Tax reimbursement has not been clearly defined as to developed versus undeveloped properties, all developed properties should receive the sales tax reimbursement and then the undeveloped properties would get any surplus. 3) Currently the resolution also commits the property owners to a future Community Facilities District. The property owners philosophically support the idea of the City pursuing a CFD but they do not wish to be bound to a new district until they know the details of it. City Attorney Scott Field stated that there are two provisions which he wished to make the Council aware of. The resolution states that the City may establish a traffic impact program and that the land owners will participate in it. The second point on page 16(c) addresses the possible formation of a regional community facilities district which would back up the traffic mitigation fees to be used to retire the debt and in that way the City could raise the funds sooner to build additional traffic improvements. He advised that the owners have stated their objection to the regional CFD until they have seen some details about what that is going to entail. Mayor Parks said he feels the Council should strike the language contained in subsection (c) on page 16. City Attorney Field stated the City would like to get as many commitments to the traffic impact fees and a future CFD as possible. This in effect is gaining votes on these matters in advance. Lisa Peterson said that on behalf of the property owners they would like to see the scope of work that is proposed, the type of improvements that are proposed, the properties that would be improved and a less vague alefin fion of the future Community Facilities District. Councilmember Moore stated that the City wishes to have the option to initiate a CFD to accomplish other projects in the future such as the Margarita Road widening and even the cultural center. The City Attorney stated that the thought is when the City is able to have a major thoroughfare program in place, the City will be looking at the other improvements identified in the Kunzman and Associates report, as yet unfunded, such as Front Street, Jefferson, widening of bridges, etc. Minutes 3/13/90 11 It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to extend the meeting to 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Jack Raymond, 613 West Valley Parkway, Escondido, a property owner, asked the City Council to take a series of straw votes indicating the City's conceptual thinking in order to assist the property owners who must make a decision regarding placing a lien on their properties in the amount of $16,000,000. Mayor Parks asked Councilmembers to indicate their position on the following issues: 1) That the amount of the proposed CFD be reduced from $60 million to $15-$18 million. City Attorney Field clarified that if the land owners wish to pay for additional improvements without the City's providing any sales tax reimbursement, as a general matter this will be acceptable to the City. The Council straw vote on this item was unanimous. 2) That the reimbursement agreement for sales tax would apply to all developed properties, not just sales tax generators. The Council straw vote on this item was unanimous. 3) That the provisions of subsection (c) on page 16 (draft no. 6) be deleted from the agreement. Councilmember Lindemans stated he felt these property owners have probably contributed enough through this Mello Roos. Mayor Parks said he felt they should not be obligated without seeing the details of another community facilities district. The straw vote was carried with Councilmember Mufioz in opposition. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to continue this matter for one week. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes 3/13/90 12 CITY MANAGER REPORTS 11. Report on Status - Club Valencia, Tract 23304 City Manager Frank Aleshire gave a staff report outlining the details of the project's timetable. He advised that the City Attorney's memo indicates that public safety issues could be a valid reason to place additional conditions on this tract or deny final approval. Ronni Crossland, 30632 Hollyberry Lane addressed the Council speaking about potential traffic hazards which will be created by this development. She also expressed concerns that emergency access is very limited. She stated that this is likely to add an additional 500 children in the area who would be wallring to the nearby schools, having to cross very busy streets. William Coghlan, representing IDM Apartments Corporation, advised the City Council that security gates are being considered for this project. He said that he would be happy to make a full presentation to the Council in two weeks time showing them all the features of the project. Councilmember Lindemans stated that he had spoken to the developer with regard to the imposition of the traffic impact fees and that they are willing to pay the $150 per unit fees. He stated that with the improvements in police protection being made by the City and the improvements in the circulation element, this project should not pose the problems he originally feared. Mayor Parks suggested that the developer have his original engineer update the traffic study presented to the County. Coleen Dobbs, 42056 Roanoake, stated that there is no left turn lane available at the site and that there will not be a left tum lane there in the future. She spoke with regard to the 30 foot wide bridges which are included in the plans to cross "canals". She questioned the safety aspects of using these bridges in the event of emergencies such as a major fire. Finally Ms. Dobbs questioned the amount being paid by the development to schools. Councilmember Lindemans responded that it is his understanding that this project is assessed $1,360 per dwelling unit in school fees for a total of $469,000. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to continue this matter for a period of two weeks. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes 3/13/90 13 It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to extend the meeting time to 11:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carded. 12. North County landfill E.I.R. City Manager Aleshire reported on the proposed locations for three landfill sites in northern San Diego County. He discussed a letter dated March 13, 1990, from Philip Anthony, Inc. proposing to prepare an impact study for the City at a cost of $4,000. Councilmember Birdsall said she felt the City Council should have some representation at the hearing to be held March 15, 1990 in Warner Springs. Councilmember Mufioz expressed his concerns with the traffic which would be generated on Highway 79 South, as a result of trucks going to and from the proposed dump site. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to authorize the City Manager to retain the firm of Philip Anthony, Inc. to represent the City of Temecula in a consulting capacity during the hearings being held and to coordinate with other concerned agencies in Riverside County. The motion was unanimously carded. Councilmember Mufioz asked that the consultant represent the City at the hearing scheduled on the Blue Canyon site to be held on March 15th. 13. BIA Survey of Development Fees City Manager Aleshire explained that the material on development fees had been presented at the request of Councilmember Lindemans and it is a receive and file item. Mayor Parks pointed out that the material is outdated and requested staff to check into more current information which shows the Temecula Valley and Murietta areas fees. 14. Introduction of the Planniqg Director and City Engineer City Manager Aleshire introduced Ron Esplain, Vice President of Willdan and Associates who then introduced the staff members who will be working on the City of Temecula projects in Willdan's consulting capacity. He introduced Ross Geller, Division Planning Manager, Tim Serlet, who will be acting City Engineer and Traffic Engineer Said Omar. Minu~s 3/13/90 14 He advised that Willdan and Associates has served in a similar capacity for the Cities of Moreno Valley, Highland and 29 Palms. Ross Geller outlined that Phase One will be to process pending permits. Staff from Willdan will be in Temecula City Hall one day per week and will open an information counter. Phase Two will start the transition to full time City control of the planning process. They will coordinate the transmittal of documents from the County to the City, they will prepare forms and documents and will conduct work sessions with the City Council and Planning Commission as well as develop staffing needs recommendations. The engineering department will provide plan check services and will coordinate the transition of all files. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None presented CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Lindemarts requested that the matter of the City business license be added to a future agenda and also asked staff to study the feasibility of forming an ad hoc committee to act as a redevelopment agency. Councilmember Moore reported on the Sheriff's negotiating committee meeting and the consideration of interim services through June 30, 1990. She asked that the proposal of the committee be placed in resolution form and added to the agenda for the next meeting. Councilmember Mufioz spoke regarding the comments made by the City Manager during the meeting of March 3, 1990. He stated that he objected to the comments because he felt it is inappropriate to deny the public the right to express their spontaneous reactions at any public meeting. He asked that the City Council be more constructive in their thinking and that he appreciated the expression of diverse opinions. He also expressed his objection to the suggestion that he and Councilmember Lindemans did not cooperate with the other members of the City Council. Minutea 3/13/90 15 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans,seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at 10:57 PM to a meeting to be held on March 20, 1990 at 7:00 PM in the Temecula Community Center 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carried. ATTEST: F. D. Aleshire, City Clerk Minutes 3/13/90 16