HomeMy WebLinkAbout032405 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the office of the City Clerk at (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City
to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
TO BE HELD AT
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California
Thursday, March 24, 2005 at 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Arbogast, Youmans, Lanier, Ramos, Jacobs
PRESENTATIONS:
Cynthia Wait, Temecula Police Department - Every 15 Minutes
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items
that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. if you desire to
speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary
before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by
one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
COMMISSION REPORTS
Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not
to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of January 27, 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of January 27, 2005
r:\traffic\mmmissn\agenda\2005\032405 Agenda/ajp
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Temecula Citizens Corps Update
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report.
3. Traffic Circulation Alternatives — Calle Pina Colada
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Provide direction to staff regarding the Meadowview area Traffic Circulation
Study; and
2. Provide direction to staff regarding the implementation of alternative Traffic
Calming Measures.
4. Parking Restrictions — Winchester Road and State Route 79 South
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend:
That the City Council adopt a resolution establishing a parking restriction on
Winchester Road between Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Creek Avenue;
and
That the City Council adopt a resolution establishing a parking restriction on
State Route 79 South between Bedford Court and Temecula Creek Road.
5. Traffic Signal System Operation Improvements —Winchester Road and State Route 79
South
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report and provide
recommendations as necessary.
6. Traffic Engineer's Report
Police Chiefs Report
8. Fire Chiefs Report
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on
Thursday, April 28, 2005 at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
2
r:\traFc\commissn\agenda\2005\032405 Agenda/ajp
ITEM NO. 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR
MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
JANUARY 27, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting
at 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 27, 2005, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula
City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
FLAG SALUTE
Commissioner Lanier led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Arbogast, Jacobs, Youmans, Lanier, and Ramos.
Absent: None.
PRESENTATIONS:
Police Chief Domenoe introduced three newly hired .employees of the Police
Department, Lieutenant Cynthia Wait, Lieutenant John Anderson, and Management
Analyst Heidi Schrader.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner's welcomed the newly hired Police staff.
Chairman Jacobs announced that the Main Conference Room was opened for overflow
seating.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ms. Melissa Flores, Temecula resident, expressed concern with the high volumes of cut -
through traffic on Calle Medusa and requested that the staff consider creating a cul-de-
sac or barrier to help relieve some of the high volumes of traffic on Calle Medusa.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
Commissioner Ramos thanked the Police Department for their hard work during the
holiday season maintaining safety on the roads as well as the installation of DUI check
points.
Commissioner Lanier echoed Commissioner Ramos' comments, as well as thanked Fire
Specialist Mike Horton for all his efforts with the Spark of Love Toy Drive.
Commissioner Youmans reported that he had the opportunity to attend a DUI check
point and was very impressed with the professionalism of the Police Department.
RAM i nutesT ubl icTrafficSafetyCom m issi o n012705
Commissioner Arbogast echoed the above mentioned comments by Commissioner's,
noting that she also had the opportunity to attend a DUI check point on New Year's Eve.
Ms. Arbogast welcomed the newly hired police employees to the City of Temecula.
Chairman Jacobs relayed that he as well had an opportunity to attend a DUI check point
in December and the opportunity to witness the new display travel trailer in action;
advising that it is able to alert drivers that they will be approaching a check point.
Chairman Jacobs also stated the he would like to honor a local hero, Dean Jaeschke, for
his heroic efforts during the recent metro link accident and requested that staff explore
the possibility of agendizing this request.
Fire Marshal McBride relayed that the City Council Chambers are over -crowded and
advised that those individuals whom are not seated would have to exit the City Council
Chambers.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of December 9, 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of December 9, 2004
MOTION: Commissioner Lanier moved to approve the Consent Calendar.
Commissioner Arbogast seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Draft Updated City General Plan — North General Kearny Road Extension
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review the proposal to extend
North General Kearny Road as part of the Draft General Plan and provide
the Planning Department with their comments and concerns.
Principal Planner Hogan presented the Commission with a staff report (of record), noting
the following:
o That the Item before the Commission is the recommendation by the
Community Advisory Committee (CAC) to add the extension of North
General Kearny onto the circulation element map
o That currently there are no plans at this time, that there is no approval for
an actual roadway construction; that this would simply be a
recommendation of the Public/Traffic Safety to the Planning Commission
and City Council as to whether or not the North General Kearny Road
should be on the circulation element map
R:\Minutes\PublicTraffiGSafetyCommission01 2
o That due to the large amount of growth in the City, it was the opinion of
the City Council that staff fulfill an update of the General Plan; that the
City Council identified the need for an Advisory Committee that would be
composed of 11 members, a member of the Planning Commission,
Public/Traffic Safety Commission and a member of the Community
Services Commission, a representative of the Chamber of Commerce, a
member of an Economic Development Corporation, one valley -wide
representative representing a local environmental or community
organization, and five residents, each one appointed by a member of the
City Council; and that the whole body met on the General Plan for several
years to discuss all issues involved; and that the following
recommendations below were made:
➢ That one of the changes to the current policy direction in the
Circulation Element was the connection of North General Kearny
Road between Nicolas and Margarita Roads
➢ That the CAC was of the opinion that the connection would
improve the mobility for local residents in the northern part of the
City of Temecula
➢ That the potential connection is expected to improve the
operation of two principal intersections, Winchester Road and
Nicolas Roads, and Margarita Roads
o That the request before the Public/Traffic Safety Commission would be to
make a recommendation that will be forwarded to the Planning
Commission and City Council as to whether or not the North General
Kearny Road extension should be included on the General Plan
Circulation Map.
Mr. Hogan also stated that it was the consensus of the CAC to extend North General
Kearny Road and add it as part of the Draft General Plan; advising that this would be the
best potential option to improve circulation in that northern part of Temecula.
Chairman Jacobs requested that the audience please keep conversations down to a
minimum so that comments could be heard.
Commissioner Ramos queried what type of road standards would be implemented if the
extension of North General Kearny Road were to be approved.
For Commissioner Ramos, Mr. Hogan stated the following:
o That the proposed standard would be a limited secondary; that it would be 36
feet of pavement which would be wider than the other roads in the
Meadowview area
o That there would be one lane in each direction
o That there would be a painted median or some other type of median down
the middle with turn pockets at the intersections to help improve the efficiency
of the operation
R:\Minutes\Pub li cTrafficSafetyCom m issi on012705
o That there would not be any curbs, gutters, sidewalks; that any sidewalk
issues would be addressed by a separated trail; and that the exact design of
the circulation element has not been identified at this time.
Director of Public Works Hughes noted that cross sections in rural type areas would be
sensitive to the neighborhood's to which they are planned in and that other areas of town
such as Santiago Estates, Los Ranchitos and portions of De Portola Road are planned
this way.
For clarity purposes Chairman Jacobs
Commission decision would only relate to
to include the completion of North Genera
element and include it on the circulation m
stated that tonight's Public/Traffic Safety
the General Plan Update and whether or not
Kearny Road as part of the traffic circulation
0
Chairman Jacobs also clarified that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission is not a
decision making body and would be making a recommendation which would in turn be
forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council.
Responding to Commissioner Youmans, Mr.
a solution to address congestion issues on
roads through existing neighborhoods and
option available.
Hogan stated that the CAC struggled to find
Winchester Road, and short of extending
knocking down homes, this was the only
For the Commission, Mr. Hughes relayed that the extension at North General Kearny
Road would serve City wide residents as well as Meadowview residents by providing a
balance and improvement to circulation for the overall community as a whole.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
The below mentioned individuals spoke in opposition of the extension of North General
Kearny Road as part of the Draft General Plan:
• Ms.
Rosemary Priebe
Ms.
Kathleen Roe
• Mr.
Brad Inman
Ms.
Rikki Bauer
• Mr.
Jayme Christian
Ms.
Nancy Ray
Mr.
Chris Estoch
Ms.
Lorraine Friedrich
• Mr.
Jeff Perrin
Mr.
Terry Stute
• Ms.
Shirley Richards
Mr.
Bob Johnston
• Ms.
Madeline Barnett
Ms.
Bonnie Smith
• Mr.
Clark Kegley
Mr.
Mario Vega
The above mentioned individuals spoke in opposition for the following reasons:
• That the City must preserve rural lifestyles of Meadowview residents
• That children who walk to school will be put in danger from increased traffic
• That if North General Kearny Road were to go through the character of the
community would be altered
• That there is already a traffic problem in the community
• That the streets are too narrow to take on more traffic congestion
• That Meadowview is an equestrian community and that adding more traffic will
result in more accidents
R:\Minutes\P ubli cTraffi cS afetyCom m ission012705
• That there are many blind curves in the community which could be dangerous for
traffic that is not familiar to the area
• That opening North General Kearny Road will cause property values to decrease
• that there are two churches, a park, and middle school that currently contributes
to much of the traffic
• That the quality of life for residents must be maintained
• That there already is a problem with speeders
The following individuals spoke in favor of the extension of North General Kearny Road
as part of the Draft General Plan:
• Mr.
Brian Harnet
Ms.
Jenny Strutz
• Ms.
Diana Broderick
Mr.
Steve Gosset
• Mr.
John Zahavitch
Ms.
Toby Leon
• Ms.
Suzanne Zahavitch
Ms.
Shana Fajardo
• Ms.
Veronica Kuhn
Ms.
Diana Lovett -Webb
• Mr.
Michael Spinazzola
The above mentioned individuals spoke in favor for the following reasons:
That residents in the community will have equal access to emergency services
That the more traffic circulation options that are available the better the City will
be
That an extension on North General Kearny Road would be minimal impacts on
the residents.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Arbogast thanked all the above mentioned speakers for attending the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting to voice their opinions and concerns.
For Fire Marshal McBride, Commissioner Arbogast queried on how emergency response
times would be affected if the extension were to go through.
Fire Marshal McBride stated that anytime a road is closed response times are affected in
a negative manner and that the more roads that are open the better the response times
will be.
Mr. McBride also noted that the City of Temecula has adopted a policy of a five (5)
minute response for the Fire Department and for every time a road is closed, response
times are added; and that in order to meet the policy goal, either Fire Stations would
need to be moved closer together or the policy would need to be changed to 6 or 7
minutes; but that one or the other would need to occur.
For Director of Public Works Hughes, Commissioner Arbogast queried on what the
outcome would be if the extension of North General Kearny Road were to open.
R:\Minutes\P ubli cTrafficSafetyCom m ission012705
In responding to Commissioner Arbogast's query, Mr. Hughes stated that from a
circulation standpoint, the more opportunities and choices that the public has for travel
patterns, the better the system would balance itself out.
Thanking the speakers for their attendance, Commissioner Lanier stated that he has
recently spent time in Meadowview observing traffic patterns and noted his concern with
the high volumes of traffic and rate of movement throughout the area.
Understanding the reasoning and logic behind the proposal, Commissioner Lanier stated
that he cannot support the extension of North General Kearny Road at this time.
Commissioner Youmans also thanked the community for attending tonight's meeting.
For clarity purposes, Mr. Hughes stated that the streets of Meadowview were developed
under the County's authority and that if the City were to build the North General Kearny
Road extension at this time, it would be built in a manner that would have proper
drainage, proper site distance, adequate pedestrian movements, and a separated trail to
keep pedestrians separated from vehicles.
Mr. Hughes also stated that if North General Kearny Road extension were to become
open, it would serve as a link between Nicolas Road.
For Sergeant Pino, Commissioner Youmans queried on what the traffic problems
currently are in the Meadowview area.
Responding to Commissioner Youman's query, Sergeant Pino noted that the majority of
accidents in the Meadowview area are due to speed and stop sign violations.
For the record, Commissioner Ramos stated that although he will be participating in the
discussion of North General Kearny Road, he will be abstaining due to a conflict of
interest.
For Fire Marshal McBride, Commissioner Ramos queried if gates/fences on Kahwea
Road were able to be accessed by the Fire Department.
In response to Commissioner Ramos' query, Fire Marshal McBride stated that it is his
understanding that the gate/fence on Kahwea Road is able to be accessed by the Fire
Department's Knox Box.
Commissioner Ramos relayed that although he is in favor of improved traffic circulation,
due to the uniqueness of the community, he would not be in support of the extension of
North General Kearny Road.
Chairman Jacobs queried if the City is taking measures to make the roads in
Meadowview safer.
For Chairman Jacobs, Mr. Hughes responded that at this point in time there have only
been minor improvements at various locations but that there are currently no City plans
to do any upgrades.
R:\Minutes\Publi cTrafricSafetyCom m issio n 012705
Chairman Jacobs also questioned if it would be in the best interest to have a traffic
analysis performed in the Meadowview area before making any recommendations to the
Planning Commission.
In response to Chairman Jacobs' question, Mr. Hughes noted that there is an
expectation that the Planning Commission will be hearing this item on February 2, 2005,
and that a delay in action would not be a favorable choice.
Mr. Hughes reiterated for the Commission and audience that any action or non -action on
part of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission may or may not need to be addressed in
continuing the process with the General Plan Amendment; advising that the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission would only be reviewing the circulation element and
providing comments.
Mr. Hughes also stated that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission should only be
reviewing the street connection from a public safety and traffic circulation standpoint;
that although the comments that were heard by residents are appropriate for the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission to consider during deliberation, the action of the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission would only be advisory and it is not recommended that
a delay in action be taken.
MOTION: Commissioner Lanier moved to deny the proposal to extend North General
Kearny Road as part of the Draft General Plan. Commissioner Youmans seconded the
motion and voice vote died for a lack of voice vote, Commissioner Ramos abstained
and Commissioner's Arbogast and Jacobs voted No.
Chairman Jacobs stated that the roads belong to the City as a whole and that traffic is a
problem throughout the City of Temecula; that although he understands the concerns of
Meadowview residents, that it is his opinion that the proposal to extend North General
Kearny Road as part of the Draft of the General Plan must be explored.
Empathizing with Meadowview residents, Commissioner Arbogast stated as a
Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner, it is her duty to consider the public safety aspects as
far as emergency response is concerned, and is also in support of the exploration of the
extension of North General Kearny Road.
Understanding Commissioner Arbogast's concern regarding emergency response in the
Meadowview area, Commissioner Lanier stated that it is his opinion that once Nicolas
Road is expanded and the 3rd left -turn lane from Nicolas Road to Winchester Road is
completed by Roripaugh, emergency response times will be met.
Commissioner Youmans stated that although he understands that there is a traffic
problem in the City of Temecula, he is of the opinion that an extension to North General
Kearny Road is not the solution.
That due to a split motion, no action was taken but Commissioner's comments will be
forwarded to the Planning Commission and City Council..
At 8:35 p.m., the Public/Traffic Safety Commission took a 10 minute recess
At 8:45 p.m., the Commission reconvened.
R:\Minutes\PublicTrafficSafetyCommission012705 7
It was the consensus of the Commission to extend the meeting to 10:00 p.m.
3. Request for Traffic Controls — Calle Pina Colada
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Deny the request to construct a new road along the Metropolitan
Water District Easement; and
2. Deny the request to install multi -way stop signs on Calle Pina
Colada; and
3. Deny the request to install traffic circles on Calle Pina Colada; and
4. Deny the request to convert Calle Pina Colada to a one-way
street; and
5. Deny the request to close Calle Pina Colada; and
6. Provide direction to staff regarding the request to initiate the
Meadowview Traffic Study; and
7. Provide direction regarding opening Kahwea Road, Sanderling
Way, Starling Street and North General Kearny Road.
Principal Engineer Moghadam presented the Public/Traffic Safety Commission with a
staff report (of record), noting the following:
That staff was directed by the City Council to bring the item before the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission at the request of the residents on Call Pina
Colada
• The following are requests from residents in the area of Calle Pina Colada for
the Commission's consideration:
• Close Calle Pina Colada
• Construct a new road along the Metropolitan Water District Easement
• Installation of traffic circles on Calle Pina Colada
• Convert Calle Pina Colada to a one-way street
• Consideration of initiating a traffic study in the Meadowview area
• Provide direction regarding opening Kahwea Road, Sanderling Way,
Starling Street, and North General Kearny Road
Mr. Moghadam relayed that subsequent data collected in the same area over a five (5)
day period (see staff report), indicated that the 85`h percentile speed on Calle Pina
Colada is 35 mph and the Average Daily Traffic Count (ADT) volume is approximately
2,851 between La Serena Way and Del Rey Road.
Mr. Moghadam also stated that the first five (5) above mentioned requests cannot be
supported by staff due to the lack of warrants and do the fact that they have been proven
ineffective.
R:\Minutes\Pu bl i cTrafficSafetyCom m ission012705
Director of Public Works Hughes added for clarity that the item before the Public/Traffic
Commission is at the request of the City Council, prompted by residents on Calle Pina
Colada; that staff worked hard to address each of the identified possible solutions to the
traffic volumes on Calle Pina Colada.
Mr. Hughes also noted that staff was directed to explore the possibility of opening other
streets to help balance the traffic in the area; that staff is not providing a
recommendation one way or another with regards to those requests.
For Mr. Hughes, Chairman Jacobs queried if opening Kahwea Road, Sanderling Way,
Starling Way and North General Kearny Road would help to balance traffic.
For Chairman Jacobs, Mr. Hughes responded that it is staff's opinion that opening
streets help to balance traffic; but that Calle Pina Colada would likely still have
considerable high volumes due to it being an attractive route; and that while opening
streets would help to remove some trips from Calle Pina Colada, it would not completely
resolve Calle Pina Colada residents' situation to their satisfaction.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
The below mentioned individuals spoke in opposition of the opening of Kahwea Road,
Sanderling Way, Starling Street and North General Kearny Road for reasons stated
below:
• Ms.
Gina Perrin
• Ms.
Sandi Gesswein
• Mr.
Norman Clark
• Mr.
Richard Moriki
• Mr.
Chuck Washington
• Ms.
Jan Austin
Ms.
Jenny Strutz
Mr.
Steve Gosset
Ms.
Toby Leon
Ms.
Shana Fajardo
Ms.
Diana Lovett -Webb
Mr.
Michael Spinazzola
• That the roads in Meadowview cannot handle any additional traffic
• That the streets are too narrow to take on any more traffic congestion
• That by adding additional traffic in the area will put children and horses in danger
• That adding more traffic into the area will only add to the already high volumes of
stop -light violations and speed violations
The below mentioned individuals spoke in favor of the opening of Kahwea Road,
Sanderling Way, Starling Street and north General Kearny Road for the following
reasons:
Ms. Jayme Christian
• Ms. Cheryl Huber
• Mr. Brett Saunders
• Mr. Walt Carpenter
Mr. Walt Carpenter
Ms. Suzanne Zychowicz
Mr. John Zychowicz
• That opening the above mentioned streets will help to increase the quality of life
for residents throughout Temecula by providing more accessibility
• That Calle Pina Colada was designed to be a residential street and is currently
being used as a collector street
R:\Minutes\PublicTrafficSafetyCommission012705 9
That opening Kahwea Road; Sanderling Way, Starling Street, and North General
Kearny Road will provide a better balance and distribution of local traffic in the
area and alleviate traffic congestion at intersections of Margarita Road and
Winchester Road, Nicolas Road and Winchester Road, and Margarita Road and
North General Kearny Road during peak hours
That a no -left -turn sign out of Calle Pina Colada onto La Serena or a no -left -turn
onto Calle Pina Colada from La Serena would be a probable solution.
That more Police Officers are needed to enforce the speeders in the area.
At 9:59 p.m., the Public Hearing was closed.
Commissioner Ramos relayed that due to a conflict of interest he will not be able to vote
on this item and excused himself from the dais.
Commissioner Arbogast noted that for safety purposes, the residents of Calle Pina
Colada may want to consider installing signs that indicate where equestrian trails are
located.
Commissioner Arbogast also queried the feasibility of conducting a study indicating
whether or not a no -left -turn out of Calle Pina Colada onto La Serena would be feasible.
For Commissioner Arbogast, Mr. Hughes responded that it would be feasible to restrict
turning movements at Calle Pina Colada and La Serena but is of the opinion that most
motorists would not observe the signs unless there was a physical obstruction to keep
motorist from making movements.
In responding to Commissioner Arbogast's query regarding traffic accidents on Calle
Pina Colada and La Serena, Sergeant Pino stated that at this time he does not have that
information available, but will e-mail the information to her.
In an effort to save time, it was consensus of the Commission to take a motion for each
item separately.
Chairman Jacobs directed staff to explore the possibility of purchasing a solar/battery-
run LED signs that are effective in reducing speeds up to 20 percent.
Item No. 1
MOTION: Commissioner Youmans moved to deny the request of construction of a new
road along the Metropolitan Water District Easement. Commissioner Lanier seconded
the motion and voice vote reflected approval of the denial with the exception of
Commissioner Ramos who abstained.
Item No. 2
MOTION: Commissioner Lanier moved to deny the request to install multi -way stop
signs on Calle Pina Colada. Commissioner Arbogast seconded the motion and voice
vote reflected approval of the denial with the exception of Commissioner Ramos who
abstained.
RAMi nutes\Pu bl i cTrafficSafetyCom m issi o n012705 10
Item No.3
MOTION: Commissioner Lanier moved to deny the request to install traffic circles on
Calle Pina Colada. Commissioner Arbogast seconded the motion and voice vote
reflected approval of the denial with the exception of Commissioner Ramos who
abstained.
Item Nos. 5. 6, and 7
MOTION: Commissioner Lanier moved that these items be continued to February or
March to give staff time to explore the possibility of making Calle Pina Colada a one-way
street, that lane narrowing, chicanes, road striping, and other traffic calming measures
be provided; that staff provide modeling of what the potential impacts would be if
Kahwea Road were to be opened; and that no studies be taken for Sanderling Way,
Starling Street, and North General Kearny Road. Commissioner Arbogast seconded the
motion voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Ramos who
abstained and Chairman Jacobs who voted No.
Chairman Jacobs suggested adding a traffic study to the motion
AMENDED MOTION AS FOLLOWS:
Commissioner Lanier moved that these items be continued to February or March to give
staff time to explore the possibility of making Calle Pina Colada a one-way street, that
lane narrowing, chicanes road striping, and other traffic calming measures be provided;
that staff provide modeling of what the potential impact would be if Calle Pina Colada
were to be opened; and that no studies be taken for Sanderling Way, Starling Street,
and North General Kearny Road. Commissioner Arbogast seconded the motion voice
vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Ramos who abstained and
Chairman Jacobs who voted No. AMENDMENT: Commissioner Lanier moved to add
that a traffic study be completed and added to the motion. Commissioner Arbogast
seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Ramos who abstained.
Item No. 4
MOTION: It was the consensus of the Commission to continue this item to the February
or March meeting.
4. Public/Traffic Safety Commission Goal Planning - 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission engage in a goal planning
discussion for the coming year.
It was the consensus of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to continue this Item to the
February 24, 2005 meeting.
R:\Minutes\PublicTraff cSafetyCommission012705 11
5. Traffic Engineer's Report
No report was provided at this time.
6. Police Chiefs Report
Sergeant Pino invited the Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner's to a DUI checkpoint to be
held Friday, January 28, 2005 at Pechanga Parkway.
Fire Chiefs Report
Fire Marshal Mc Bride reported that the Spark of Love Toy Drive was a big success.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:35 p.m. Chairman Jacobs formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, February
24, 2005 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula.
Chairman Paul Jacobs Administrative Assistant Anita Pyle
RAM i nutesTublicTrafficSafetyCom m ission012705 12
ITEM NO. 2
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM:
Ali Moghadam, Principal Engineer
DATE:
February 24, 2005
SUBJECT:
Item No. 2
Temecula Citizen Corps Update
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report.
BACKGROUND:
Lt. Cynthia Wait, Temecula Police Department will provide an update on the Temecula Citizen
Corps programs and successes.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
c\traffc\commissn\agenda\2005\032405\Citizens Corp Update
ITEM NO. 3
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: ?Ali Moghadam, P.E., Principal Engineer, Traffic
DATE: March 24, 2005
SUBJECT: Item 3
Traffic Circulation Alternatives — Calle Pina Colada
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Provide direction to staff regarding the Meadowview area Traffic Circulation Study; and
2. Provide direction to staff regarding the implementation of alternative Traffic Calming
Measures.
BACKGROUND:
At the meeting of January 27, 2005, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered a requestfrom
the Calle Pina Colada residents to review feasibility of implementing one or more of eight (8) specific
circulation alternatives which the residents believed would alleviate vehicular speeds and volumes
on Calle Pina Colada. After considering all eight issues, the Commission denied five (5) of the
requests and asked staff to explore the possibility of making Calle Pina Colada a one-way street,
explore other traffic calming measures such as lane narrowing and chicanes, model the
Meadowview area to determine potential impacts associated with the opening of Kahwea Road and
bring the results back at a future meeting in February or March for further consideration. The public
has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the
agenda notification process and by mail.
Meadowview Area Traffic Circulation Stud
In order to fully asses any potential impacts associated with the opening of Kahwea Road and other
residential streets in that area, a comprehensive traffic analysis would be needed which would
include modeling current circulation patterns and vehicular volumes in the Meadowview area,
modeling patterns and vehicular volumes with the opening of Kahwea and other roads, and
identifying any potential impacts to streets within the Meadowview area.
Staff contacted Terry Austin of Austin -Foust and Associates, the City's General Plan Circulation
Element consultant, to determine if an analysis could be performed utilizing the City's current
Circulation Plan model. Mr. Austin indicated that the current traffic model could be used to perform
a comprehensive analysis of the Meadowview area; however, the model's Traffic Analysis Zone
(TAZ) would need to be modified to accommodate a much smaller and focused analysis area. He
explained that the modification of the model's traffic zones would be very time consuming and the
reconfiguration and subsequent analysis could take up to twelve (12) months to complete with an
approximate cost of $50,000.00.
r:\traRc\commissn\agenda\2005\0324\Ca IlePinasColada
Mr. Austin also indicated that in order to provide a study which would be acceptable to the residents,
several workshops with the residents would be necessary to include their concerns in preparation of
the detailed study.
For these reasons staff is recommending that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission provide
further direction on this issue.
Traffic Calming Measures
In the past, the Commission and City Council have recommended the implementation of several
traffic calming measures on an experimental basis to mitigate vehicular speeds and volumes on
residential streets.
In 1999, traffic circles and chokers were temporarily installed on Via Cordoba to evaluate their
effectiveness in reducing vehicular speeds and volumes over a four month evaluation period. The
results of the evaluation revealed that the traffic circles and chokers did not reduce overall vehicular
speeds or volumes and the chokers created access problems for residential driveways. The
majority of the residents were opposed to the permanent installation of the traffic calming measures
and requested removal and restoration of the street to its prior condition. Based on the results of
this demonstration project, the City Council has not embraced the further use of traffic circles or
chokers as an effective traffic control device on residential streets.
In February 2003, following a request from the Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association, the
Commission directed staff to explore the feasibility of implementing traffic calming measures along
Promenade Chardonnay Hills which included a centerline, striped bike lane and parking lane to
reduce vehicular speeds and cut -through traffic. The HOA ultimately rejected this alternative and
suggested the installation of a raised median island at various locations along Promenade
Chardonnay Hills. Staff developed median island concept plans and identified seven (7) potential
median island locations. Subsequently, the concept plans were presented to the HOA for review
and concurrence. The HOA however, was opposed to the location of the median islands because it
limited access to and from residential driveways and eliminated on -street parking at the median
island locations. The median island alternative was ultimately rejected and multi -way stop signs
were installed on Promenade Chardonnay Hills.
In November 2003, a double yellow centerline was installed on Calle Pina Colada between La
Serena Way and Del Rey Road to help reduce the speed of vehicles by creating a visual narrowing
of the roadway after speed humps were removed, as requested by the residents, at a cost of
$22,000.00. Following the installation of the centerline, staff received numerous complaints and
subsequent requests from residents along Calle Pina Colada to remove the centerline because it
was their opinion that vehicular speeds had increased after the installation of the centerline and that
the centerline gave the appearance that Calle Pina Colada was a "major thoroughfare instead of a
residential street". Based on the results of this experiment it is staff's opinion that any type of striped
traffic calming measure implemented to visually reduce the width of the roadway would meet with
resistance from the residents of Calle Pina Colada.
The Commission also directed staff to investigate the feasibility of establishing Calle Pina Colada as
a One -Way street. This alternative was discussed at the meeting of January 2005 and staff
maintains the opinion that this alternative would limit emergency vehicle access, increase
emergency vehicle response time and compromise safety. Moreover, vehicular volumes would be
diverted to adjacent streets such as Avenida Barca. The impacts to Avenida Barca from a one-way
Calle Pina Colada alternative would need to be specifically addressed in the Meadowview traffic
study.
ritmffic\mmmissn�agenda12005103241CaIlePinasColada
Commissioner Lanier requested that staff review the feasibility of implementing other types of traffic
calming measures on Calle Pina Colada as identified in "Types of Traffic Calming Measures"
prepared by Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants. Staff will discuss several of the measures
individually during the meeting. A copy of several traffic calming measures is attached as Exhibit
„B„
As past traffic calming attempts on Via Cordoba, Calle Pina Colada and Promenade Chardonnay
Hills have shown, any type of traffic calming measure is going to cause some type of inconvenience
such as limited access, loss of on -street parking, additional vehicular noise and aesthetic impacts to
the residents living on the street. In the past, the residents at these locations have been unwilling to
compromise their convenience for these traffic calming measures. It is staff's opinion that the
implementation of any of the traffic calming measures discussed in the presentation will result in a
similar outcome.
Therefore, staff is recommending that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission provide further
direction on this issue.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" — Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" — Traffic Calming Measures
r\traff c\comm issn\agenda\2005\0324\CallePi nasColada
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT "B"
TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
60
DESIGN FEATURE: Traffic Circle.
DESCRIPTION: A small circular island placed in the center
of an existing local street intersection, thus creating a
small "roundabout" or "rotary."
EFFECT ON SPEED: Varies with street and circle dimensions,
but almost invariably there is a noticeable reducing effect.
Some configurations will impact all vehicles whereas others
will cause only those on the higher end of the speed profile
to slow.
EFFECT ON VOLUME: Inconclusive evidence as to the volume
reducing effect of a circle. Most likely to deter the
unfamiliar driver who may, from a distance, visually
perceive the circular island as a route discontinuity.
OTHER POSITIVE ASPECTS: An attractive landscaping
opportunity for a neighborhood to express itself and allow
its civic pride to show with flowers or other distinctive
features.
OTHER NEGATIVE ASPECTS: Potentially a hazard in the middle
of the roadway, especially if monuments are erected.
Required safety signing can detract from its aesthetic
quality. Pedestrians on sidewalk and bicycles on roadside
are slightly more at risk due to need for vehicle path
deflection. Some parking may be lost on approaches to
accommodate vehicles' defected paths. Unsafe left turns
accomplished by 1/4 circle in clockwise direction can
compromise safety and efficiency (3/4 circle in
counter -clockwise direction is the proper turn method).
DISCUSSION: Design features must allow for fire apparatus
and trash truck maneuverability. May require all -way stop
control inorder to operate safely and efficiently. If
landscaped, will result in an on -going maintenance
responsibility which must. be defined at the outset.
W11
11
Roundabouts are raised circular areas (sun lar to metes) placed at intersections. Drivers travel m a counter-
clockwise direction around the circle. Modem roundabouts are 'yield upon entry," meaning that cars in the
circle have the right of way and can entering the circle must wait to do so until the path is clear. When a
roundabout is placed in an intersection, vehicles may not travel in a straight line.
Reduces crashes by so to 90 percent when compared to
2-way, 4-way stop signs and traffic signals by reducing the
number of conflict points at intersections.
Reduces speed at intersection approach.
Longer speed reduction influence zones.
Provides space for landscaping.
Cheaper to maintain than a traffic signal.
Effective at muhi-leg intersections.
Provides equal access to intersections for all drivers.
Provides a good environment for cyclists. .
Does not restrict movements, but makes them more
difficult
• May be restrictive for larger vehicles if designed to a low
speed. Providing a mountable apron mkhni? s this
limitation.
• May require additional lighting and signage.
• If left turns by large vehicles are to be accommodated then
right of way may have to be purchased.
• Initial safety issues as drivers adjust
• May increase volumes on adjacent streets.
• Maintenance responsibility if landscaped.
DESIGN FEATURE: Choker
DESCRIPTION: narrowing of a street at an intersection or
midblock in order to reduce width of the traveled -way by
construction of a sidewalk widening ("curb bulb").
EFi'ECT ON SPEED: Slight slowing is normally the result.
EFFECT ON VOLMM: Insignificant, unless the number of
lanes is reduced (which is not likely to be the case in a
residential street).
OTHER POSITIVE ASPECTS: Shorter pedestrian crossing
distances and better motorist -pedestrian visibility of each
other. Creates added streetscape area for pedestrian
for
activities and/or landscaping. Provides an opportunity
gateway treatment to define a neighborhood. If designed
carefully, can restrict truck entry. Allows signs to be
placed closer to driver's cone of vision.
OTHER NEGATIVE ASPECTS: Potential obstacle for motorists
to run into. Can impede bicycle mobility and safety. May
result in loss of curbside parking. Can impede legitimate
truck movements (fire apparatus, refuse vehiclesj. Requires
reworking of surface drainage, which can be difficult and/or
costly.
DISCUSSION: The psychological effect of chokers may be
their most important attribute. Used on several streets in
an area, they may serve to define the outer limits of a
nei hborhood, particularly if a unified design concept is
employed. '
2s
ONE-WAY ENTRY/EXIT CHOKERS,
HALF -CLOSURES, SEMI-DIVERTERS
A semi-diverter is a barrier to traffic in one
direction of a street that permits traffic in the
opposite direction to pass through. In a sense, it
is a physical reinforcement to a regulatory "Do
Not Enter" sign and is normally accompanied by
such a device, as well as by turn prohibition
signs on the crossing street. It is an alternative
to using a one-way street designation for the
same block, and allows resident on the block
limited two-way travel opportunity.
s dvantages
• Reduces through traffic in one direction and possibly in the
other.
Allows two way traffic in the remainder of the sneer. i
• Good for pedestrians due to shorter crossing distance.
tProvides space for landscaping.
Can be designed to provide two way access for bicycles.
1
fly
Q
WITH SEMI-DIVERTER AND HALF CLOSURE
Semi-Diverters
jisadvantages
Reduces access for residents,
Emergency vehicles are only pattially'affected as they have
to drive around partial closure with care.
Compliance with semi-diverters is not 100%.
May incrcase trip length for some residents.
Maintenance responsibility if landscaped.
26
DESIGN FEATURE: Semi-diverter
DESCRIPTION: A physical barrier across half a street,
usually at an intersection, which precludes movement in one
direction but not the other. Often used as a physical
reinforcement of a DO NOT ENTER restriction.
EFFECT ON SPEED: May tend to exclude a speed -prone element
of the driving population. Otherwise no effect.
EFFECT ON VOL0M: Will reduce local street volume to the
extent that the eliminated moves contributed to that volume.
OTHER POSITIVE ASPECTS: Less restrictive than one-way
operation, but with many of the same benefits. Emergency
vehicles. can easily "violate" the conveyed partial closure
in the interest of reducing response time.
OTHER NEGATIVE ASPECTS: Residents tend to expect 100%
effectiveness of such a devices and therefore map focus
their attentions on how many violators exist. The
semi-diverter is a potential obstacle for the inattentive
driver to run into, and must be sufficiently well marked and
lighted so as to minimize public agency exposure to
liability.
DISCUSSION: By narrowing the entry throat to an
intersection, a semi-diverter can effectively convey a sense
of community privacy without saying so outright. It also
creates a physical location with excellent target value for
installation of a DO NOT ENTER sign.
It may be desirable in some cases to permit a bicycle
exemption to the movement which is restricted by the
semi-diverter.
SEMI-DIVERTER AND HALF CLOSURE
mx
: - F r
at � e - 03ask
avw»mw,�mm.wn h
m+ .w✓
r
EM
49
BEFORE
'F i^a: � � •zrt
2 tr 'ara
i
— raised or painted
raised with bollards
WITH SEMI-DIVERTER AND HALF CLOSURE
)efWhon: small frame K—as msmuea al mcuncaws To enamel tmamg moveme=
lvantages I Disadvantages
Changes driving patterns.
May reduce art through traffic.
May be attractive if landscaped
Forced 7ums
I
awi
kWO
• May increase trip length for some drivers.
• Can be aesthetically unamaedve if not landscaped.
• May increase response times for emergency vehicles.
• Maintenance responsibility if landscaped.
DESIGN FEATURE: MeditL& Sarrier
DESCRIPTION: A physical barrier on a non -local street
which can effectively eliminate left turns from that
non -local street onto a local residential street, and which
can also eliminate local street straight -through traffic
across the non -local street.
EFFECT ON SPEED: May tend to exclude a speed -prone element
of the driving population from the local street. Left -turn
friction should also be reduced, thereby enhancing flow
characteristics, including speed, on the non -local street. i
EFFECT ON VOLUME: Will reduce local street volume to the
extent that the eliminated moves contributed to that volume.
OTHER POSITIVE ASPECTS: Less friction on the non -local
street helps its efficiency, which in turn makes intrusion
into neighborhoods less attractive. The resulting
right-turn-in/right-turn-out operation should also be an
enhancement to safety.
OTHER NEGATIVE ASPECTS: May overload downstream locations
where left -turn opportunities exist, which could negatively
affect both safety and efficiency of the non -local corridor.
This treatment will also inconvenience local residents who
will be forced to drive longer more circuitous paths to
reach their homes.
DISCUSSION: Median islands are a well -established
mechanism which in most cases will not be difficult to sell
to the public. Care must be taken along the non -local
street that safety and congestion problems are not created
elsewhere, and that drivers are not encouraged to use
Private property.(parking lots, etc.) to assist in turning
around or otherwise circumventing the intent of the barrier.
A median barrier can take many forms, ranging from a,
closely -spaced row of flexible delineator posts to a series
of pre -cast curb sections affixed to the pavement to a
temporarily -placed but immovable 3' high concrete barrier
(so called "K-Rail") to an asphalt/concrete curbed island
with or without a decorative landscaping and surface
treatment. Costs vary widely among those options.
RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT CHANNELIZATION
r^x„
um
y yi a
ywmaAvae �M'
...�•>,».��t a smart
BEFORE
e.W'nN Sn�.Y x..i dols q1q/)1 wa _
WE
c-„
e� �.wau.wv.•xrvwawnua»w;wro�M.+•.m� . .n
dim
> ru
bra a ,n � ::•i
1
WITH RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT CHANNELIZATION
)
um
y yi a
ywmaAvae �M'
...�•>,».��t a smart
BEFORE
e.W'nN Sn�.Y x..i dols q1q/)1 wa _
WE
c-„
e� �.wau.wv.•xrvwawnua»w;wro�M.+•.m� . .n
dim
> ru
bra a ,n � ::•i
1
WITH RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT CHANNELIZATION
)
TURN CHANNELIZATION
o?
nsun
BEFORE
WITH TURN CHANNELIZATION
�dvantages Disadvantagres
Reduces vehicle speed. Can cause confusion regarding priority movements.
Reduces through traffic along top of tee. Increased maintenance if landscaped.
Necessary to enforce changes in priority from one street to
another.
May provide space for landscaping.
34
physical curb reduction of road width at intersections Similar to lane narrowing but used at
mtaseetion(s). Widining of street comas at intersections to discourage cm -through traffic and to help define
neighborhoods. (Multiple application shown below.) . .
May be aesthetically pleasing, if landscaped.
Good for pedestrian due to shorter crossing distance.
Can be used in multiple applications or on a single segment
of roadway.
Disadvantages
• Unfriendly to cyclists unless designed to accommodate
them.
• Landscaping may cause sight line problems.
• Increased maintenance if landscaped.
nt
42
MID -BLOCK SLOW POINTS, CHICANES
Serpentine curb protrusions offset from each
other in mid -block locations that narrow the
width of the roadway and help reduce traffic I�
speeds and improve safety. J
Chicanes
Parking No
Permitted Parking
No Parking
Parking Permitted
TWO-LANE ANGLED SLOW POINT -
�L
DeftWon: Angled deviations to deter the path of travel so that the sweet is not a straight Ime (by the installation of offset
curb extensions May be used in a single lane or double lane application, double lane application shown below.
- o
Reduces vehicle speed . Landscaping needs to be controlled to ensure visibility is
More effective when used in a series. reduced
Imposes minimal inconveniences to local traffic. • Contrary to driver expectation of unobstructed flow.
Pedestrians have a reduced crossing distance. 0 Can be hazardous for drivers and cyclists if not designed I
Provides space for landscaping. and maintained properly.
Provides a visual obstruction.. • Confrontation between opposmg drivers arriving 1{
simultaneously may create problems I .
Double lane application is less effective in controlling. I
speeds than single lane because drivers can create a
straighter through movement by driving over centerline.
Increases area of landscaping to be maintained by residents.
_.rl..'.. a..... . __ _-MV
Q Saw pbysscally narrowed to expand sidewalks and landscaped areas: possibly adding medians, on snoet
pig, ar ( Similar to Neckdowns but used at mid -block).
Minor inconveniences to drivers.
Minimal inconveniences to local traffic.
Good for pedestrians due to shorter crossing distance.
Provides space for landscaping.
Slows traffic without seriously affecting emergency
response time.
Effective when used in a series.
Single lane narrowing reduces vehicle speed and through
traffic.
Disadvantages
• Double lane narrowing not very effective at reducing speeds
or diverting through traffic.
• only partially effective as a visual obstruction.
• Unfriendly to cyclists unless designed to accommodate
them.
• Conflict between opposing drivers arriving simultaneously
could create problems.
Definition: Mainline deviations to doer the path of travel so that the met is not a straight line (by the installation of offset
crab wacusions).
ti, P
Imposes minimal inconveniences to local traffic.
Pedemiaas have a reduced crossing dimmce.
Provides huge area for landscaping.
Provides a greater visual obstruction.
Cost of device is limited by length.
A very effective method of changing the initial impression
of the street If done correctly duvets will not be able to see
through. Appears as a road closure yet allows through
movement
Accepted by public as speed control device.
Aesthetically pleasing.
Reduces speed without significantly impacting emergency
response.
Disadvantages
• Increases the area of landscaping to be maintained by
residents.
• Cost is greater than many other devices, therefore better to
be installed in conjunction with street reconstruction or
initial design.
• May create oppornmities for head-on conflicts on narrow
streets.
Definition:
Self-explanatory. (Changing the traffic flow paaern
with one way sweets should be considered only in areas ..y
them is a documented high percent of art through traffic and where ahemative mutes exist)
=;rises»
. .....mob-..
Can lead to increased vehicle speeds -
Tends to be safer due to lack of friction from opposm� May result in longer trip lengths
traffic flow. . May increase emery ocy response time.
Can facilitate traffic flow through an area . May increase volumes on other streets.
Cats open up narrow :Deets for mom resident parking- Initial safety concerns as drivers adjust
Increases pedestrian safety. vehicles.
Maintains reasonable access for emetgenry
Maze effect of one-way traffic can discornage through
traffic.
FULL INVERTER
BEFORE
gi
"-"
Ell ...
ec
- raised
- - - ..........
_ ......
._._._ ._..-._._....
........_..........................
yW
�
x
3x s
s
WITH FULL DIVERTER
DIAGONALsDIVERTERS
wrrtr Fuu. wvERTa
A diagonal diverter is a barrier placed diagonally
across an intersection that prevents traffic from
continuing straight through and forces motorists
to make a sharp turn. Its purpose is to block a
major cut -through route within the
neighborhood and make travel through a
neighborhood difficult without actually
preventing it It is most effective when used in a
pattern of similar diverters.
Diagonal Diverters
Avantases
Eliminates through traffic.
Provides area for landscaping.
Reduces traffic conflict points.
Increases pedestrian safety.
Can include bicycle path connection.
• May inconvenience residents gaining access to their
properties.
• May inhibit access by emergency vehicles.
• May divert through traffic to other local streets
• Altered traffic patterns may increase trip length.
)efmition: Street closed to motor vehicles using pests. bollards, or barriers, M.
dvantages Disadvantages
,Eliminates through traffic . Reduces emergency vehicle access.
Reduces speed of the remaining vehicles. . Reduces access to es for residents.
Improves safety for all the street users. prom
Pedestrian and bike access maintained. May an unwaybe mtcded as inconvenience restriction by the same neighbors and
rrdnted general public.
May increase trip lengths.
• May increase volumes on other sweets.
Cul-de-sacs are complete closures of a street,
either mid -block or at an intersection. They are
intended to completely block access from one
end of a local street, while allowing adequate
turnaround for most vehicles.
47
Definition: Street closed to motor vehicles using planters, bollards, or barrios, ett;
Cul-de-Sac Closures
ITEM NO. 4
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Ali Moghadam, P.E., Principal Engineer, Traffic
DATE: March 24, 2005
SUBJECT: Item 4
Parking Restrictions — Winchester Road and State Route 79 South
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend:
1. That the City Council adopt a resolution establishing a parking restriction on Winchester
Road between Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Creek Avenue; and
2. That the City Council adopt a resolution establishing a parking restriction on State Route 79
South between Bedford Court and Temecula Creek Road.
BACKGROUND:
On February 7, 2005, the City of Temecula assumed responsibility for maintenance and operation of
Winchester Road and State Route 79 South within the city limits. Since both roadways were
formerly under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, the City did not have the authority to establish parking
restrictions on the segments located within the City.
Currently, parking is not restricted on Winchester Road and State Route 79 South. Staff has
observed on -street parking along portions of Winchester Road, which during the peak hours causes
additional delays and congestion.
The proposed parking restriction complies with the City's policy to restrict on -street parking on
arterial highways. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission approve the recommendation
that the City Council establish parking restriction on Winchester Road and State Route 79 South.
The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue
through the agenda notification process.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate funds are available in the Public Works signing and striping account.
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" — Location Map
r\traffic\mmmissn\agenda\2005\0324\Winchester&SR79/ajp
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
ITEM NO. 5
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Ali Moghadam, P.E., Principal Engineer, Traffic
DATE: March 24, 2005
SUBJECT: Item 5
Traffic Signal System Operation Improvements —Winchester Road and State
Route 79 South
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report and provide recommendations
as necessary.
BACKGROUND:
On February 7, 2005, the City of Temecula assumed responsibility for maintenance and operation of
Winchester Road and State Route 79 South within the city limits. Since assuming responsibility for
the two (2) highways staff has performed the following tasks:
❑ Developed a system network for intersections on Winchester Road from Diaz Road to
Murrieta Hot Springs Road using Synchro software. This network includes Ynez Road
between Winchester Road and Solana Way, Margarita Road between Date Street and
Solana Way and Overland Drive between Jefferson Avenue and Margarita Road.
❑ Developed three (3) time -of -day (AM, Mid -day, and PM) weekday traffic signal coordination
timing plans for the arterials mentioned in the above network.
❑ The City's Senior Traffic Signal Technician modified the existing traffic signal interconnect
wiring on Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Nicolas Road. This modification was
performed so that staff can monitor the traffic signal system's operation from the City's
Traffic Operations Center (TOC).
❑ The City's Senior Traffic Signal Technician replaced the traffic signal controller software at
six locations along the Winchester Road corridor. The replacement of this software was
necessary to maintain communication between the City's TOC and the field controllers.
❑ Implemented weekday traffic signal coordination timing plans on intersections along
Winchester Road. Staff is currently in the process of implementing the remainder of the
traffic signal coordination timing plans on Ynez Road, Margarita Road and Overland Drive.
❑ Met with Caltrans representatives on three occasions to coordinate the implementation of
compatible traffic signal controller software at the Interstate 15 Ramp signals on Winchester
Road, Rancho California Road and State Route 79 South.
r:\traffic\wmmissn\agenda2OO5\0324\W inchester&S R79SysOps/aj p
❑ Installed new cabinet locks at all intersections on Winchester Road and State Route 79
South that fall within the City's maintenance and operational responsibility to limit access to
the controller cabinets.
❑ Determined that on -street parking along Winchester Road and State Route 79 South needs
to be restricted to reduce delays and congestion during peak hours. Staff is recommending
the establishment of parking restrictions on both roadways within the City's jurisdiction.
❑ Met with developer representatives to process the modification of the traffic signal located at
Butterfield Stage Road and State Route 79 South.
In the near future staff will be performing the following tasks:
❑ Develop two (2) time -of -day (Mid -day and PM) weekend traffic signal coordination timing
plans for Winchester Road, Ynez Road, Margarita Road and Overland Drive.
❑ The City's Senior Traffic Signal Technician will be modifying existing traffic signal
interconnect on State Route 79 South between La Paz Road and Butterfield Stage Road.
This modification will allow staff to monitor the traffic signal system's operation from the
City's Traffic Operations Center (TOC).
❑ The City's Senior Traffic Signal Technician will be replacing the traffic signal controller
equipment at nine locations along the State Route 79 South and Winchester Road corridors.
The replacement of this equipment is necessary to maintain communication between the
City's TOC and the field controllers.
o Staff will be installing a wireless interconnect system from La Paz Road to the City's TOC.
This wireless system is necessary because there is no direct "hardwire" connection between
State Route 79 and the City's TOC. The wireless system will allow staff to monitor the traffic
signal system's operation from the TOC.
❑ Develop and implement weekday and weekend time -of -day traffic signal coordination timing
plans for intersections along State Route 79 South, Pechanga Parkway, and portions of
Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road.
The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue
through the agenda notification process.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adequate funds are available for these Traffic Signal System Operation Improvements in the Public
Works Traffic Division, Traffic Improvement budget.
Attachment:
None
r9traffc\commissn\agenda\2005\0324\W inchester&SRMysOps/aip
ITEM NO. 6
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: March 22, 2005
SUBJECT: Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of
Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of February, 2005.
MOACTRPT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
February / March 2005
Prepared By: Amer Attar
Submitted by: William G. Hughes
Date: March 22, 2005
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1. John Warner Road Assessment District
Under this project an assessment district was formed. This district includes the construction of street
and storm drain improvements in the John Warner Road area. This project is complete. Afterweeks
of delays, the contractor submitted Contractor's Affidavit & Final Release on 3/9/05. Notice of
Completion is to be filed this month.
2. Rancho California Road Widening & Median Modifications East of Ynez Road
The project will include the closing of the two median openings on Rancho California Road in front
of the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via
Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. In addition, a dedicated right turn lane will be added on the
eastbound direction on Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. This project is complete. The Notice
of Completion is to be filed this month.
3. Old Town Community Theatre
This project will construct a 20,000 square foot community theater complex and refurbishes the
existing Mercantile Building. The acquisition of 4th Street right of way is complete. All
environmental permits have been obtained. Construction started on 3-3-04 and the allowable
working days (14 months + 16 days) extends to 5-05-05. Work is progressing on the erection of
roofing, framing and utility rough ins for the structures.
4. Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements — Phase II
This project will construct the storm drain triple box culvert and the channel improvements north of
Loma Linda. As part of this stage the entire Pechanga Parkway, Phase II project will be
environmentally cleared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Muirfield Drive is temporarily closed to residents. Detour signs have been installed to direct the
residents around the construction zone. The final construction items to be completed are as follows:
Re -paving of the Muirfield Drive connection to Pechanga Parkway, miscellaneous backfill
operations, and a concrete outlet structure. Completion date for the project is the end of March
2005.
5. Pechanga Parkway Phase 1113 Storm Drain Improvements (Wolf Valley Creek Channel -
Stage 2)
The project includes the construction of a grass -lined channel/ box culverts from Loma Linda
Road to Deer Hollow Road. The box culvert at Wolf Valley Road is currently under construction.
A traffic detour on the south of Wolf Valley Road is in place and pedestrians/school children
R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2005\luuary-Febmary.doc
have a separate sidewalk through the construction zone. Completion date for the project is
schedule for June 2005.
6. Diaz Road Realignment Phase I, Traffic Signals
Under this project, two traffic signals will be installed, one on Diaz Road at Rancho Way and the
other one on Rancho California Road at Business Park Drive/Vincent Moraga. Also, a northbound
lane will be added on Diaz Road from Rancho Way to Via Montezuma (Low Flow Crossing). The
contractor has completed all work on this project. The Notice of Completion will be filed in April.
7. Vail Ranch Park (Near Pauba Valley School) -Add Amenities
This project will add amenities, including play equipment, to the recently annexed Vail Ranch Park.
Work on this project is complete. The final walkthrough was on 01119/05. The project is in its 90-day
maintenance period.
8. Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping
Under this project, the southern entrance to Old Town will be beautified with landscaping and
irrigation, split -rail fencing, lighted walks, and seating areas. Construction began February 7, 2005.
Grading, utility location, street crossings, and concrete curbs have been completed. Completion
anticipated by the end of March.
9. Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation - Phase II
This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from south of Overland Drive to Rancho California
Road. The design includes a complete reconstruction of the road within the project limits. In
addition, problematic driveways will be reconstructed. Pavement rehab work on Diaz Rd is part of
this project via Construction Change Order (CCO) No. 1 (per City Council meeting dated 6122/04).
Construction started on 07/06/04. The TCP was approved on 9/30/2004; nightwork began Sunday,
10/10. Contractor re -started work as of 11/29 and was able to get the road suitable for a parade on
12/10 and only completed Ph 1 of 3 by 2/05/05. On 3108105, City Council took action to terminate
Griffith's contract. A termination agreement is being processed. City staff is in the process of hiring
another contractor to complete the project as fast as possible.
10. Pechanga Parkway Landscape Improvements
America West Landscape has completed the installation of the irrigation system and landscaping. It
is anticipated that the 90-day maintenance period will begin the third week of March. SCE has yet to
install the electric service necessary for the irrigation controller.
11. Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide
Under this project, traffic signals will be installed on Meadows Parkway at La Serena and at Rancho
Vista. Staff met with representatives of Temecula Valley Unified School District on November 20,
2003, to obtain their input on the installation of the traffic signal at the intersection of Meadows
Parkway and La Serena. The traffic signals were put into service on March 10, 2005. The Notice of
Completion is forthcoming.
12. Veteran's Memorial
This project will construct a Veteran's Memorial next to the Duck Pond. Project is complete. The
project is complete. Final project close-out meeting held with contractor on 3/8/05. The project was
R:\MonthlyAcdvityReport\CIP\2005\Januuy-Febmary.doe
accepted as complete by City Council at the February 22, 2005 meeting.
13. Fire Station - Northeast Site (Roripaugh Ranch)
This project will construct a new fire station in the north part of the City. The timing of the station will
be impacted by the developer's ability to provide finished street grades, final site utilities, and finish
all site grading. The project was awarded on 10-26-04 (200 Working Days). Work is estimated to
start in late March 2005 as the recent rains have hindered the developers site grading and access
issues. Anticipated completion is February, 2006.
14. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson
This project will widen Winchester road between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson Avenue. It will also
add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise
Circle. Construction began on 12/6/04, and has been severely delayed byweather. All retaining and
monument wall work is complete. Work on Stage 1 construction (outside widening areas) continues.
Project completion date is now mid -April.
15. Temecula Sports Complex
A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built at the corner of Pechanga Parkway and Deer Hollow
Way. Bids were opened on September 16, 2004. The contract was awarded to Douglas E.
Barnhart, Inc. at the September 28, 2004 Council meeting. The contract award amount is
$13,365,055.51. Barnhart has completed approximately 90% of the rough grading. Some areas are
still drying out from the recent rains but the finished grading process should begin next week. The
Synthetic turf bid documents have been approved by the City Council and should be going out to bid
next week.
16. Vail Ranch Middle School Basketball Court Lighting
This projectwill add lights to the basketball courts at Vail Ranch Middle School. The project was bid
successfully the second time with R & M Electrical Contracting being awarded the project on March
8, 2005 in the amount of $102,696.00. Work is scheduled to begin June 27, 2005, to utilize the
summer break at the school.
17. Pechanga Parkway - Muirfield Drive Traffic Signal
Under this project, a traffic signal will be installed on Pechanga Parkway at Muirfield Drive. Traffic
signal poles have been delivered to the City. Bids were opened on March 7 and DBX Inc. is the
apparent low bidder. The contract will be awarded at the March 22 City Council meeting and
construction will begin in April 2005. Construction will be completed in approximately 25 working
days.
PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS
Temecula Library
A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba
Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resources
and services. A separate parcel has been created for the library for bond purposes. The City was
approved for funding by the State on October 28, 2003. Bid documents were distributed to the 18
R: \MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2005 V anuary-Febmary.doc
pre -qualified general contractors on 2/28/05. The bid opening date is 4/7/05.
PROJECTS IN DESIGN
2. Pechanga Parkway Improvements — Phase II (SR 79 South to Pechanga Road)
This project will widen Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) to its ultimate width from the
Pechanga Parkway Bridge to Pechanga road. The City is working with Caltrans' Local Assistance
and City's Environmental Consultant to re-classify the Preliminary Environmental Document
Classification (NEPA) of the project to Categorical Exclusion with required technical studies
(involving Federal action). The City met with the consultant to review the remaining plan check
comments. 100% plans should be submitted to the City within a couple of weeks. he Planning
Department completed Addendum No. 3 to the Wolf Creek EIR and the Notice of Determination
(NOD) for the project. The Addendum and NOD were needed to satisfy all CEQA requirements for
the project. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) issued the individual permit for the lower
section of the channel.
This project was divided into two stages. The first stage is to construct the storm drain triple box
culvert and the channel improvements north of Loma Linda. The second stage will construct the
remaining street improvements and drainage structures. Construction of this stage will start once the
first stage is completed.
3. Pauba Road Improvements — Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road)
This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate
width. The City has reviewed the 100% Design Plans submitted by the consultant. Specifications
are under review. Plans were sent to all utilities and utility issues are being addressed. Work is
being coordinated with the library project, which resumed since State funds have been secured. A
new RCW D waterline is under design to service the library project. It will tie into an existing line that
ends just west of Margarita Road. TCSD has requested the waterline be extended past the Library.
This extension was added to the second submittal, which was received on October 4,2004. RCWD
has approved the fourth submittal and reproducible documents are being prepared.
4. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road
This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly
to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening
of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland
Drive across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road. Coordination with RCFC & WCD and the Corp of
Engineers is required. The consultant is currently preparing the 70% design plans for submittal to
the City in April 2005.
5. Bridge Barrier Rail Upgrade, Rainbow Canyon Road over Pechanga Creek/Del Rio Road
over Empire Creek
This project will replace the existing barrier rails of the Rainbow Canyon Bridge over Pechanga
Creek and the Del Rio Road Bridge over Empire Creek. Project plans and specs are 100% complete
and are ready to bid. Construction Authorization was received and specifications are being updated
so that the project can go out to bid. Engineer's Estimates are being reviewed and updated due to
lengthy Caltrans review time.
R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2005\January-Febmary.doc
6. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site
A fire station will be built at the Wolf Creek Site. Administrative Development Plan Application was
submitted to City Planning Department on 2/4/05; pre-DRC meeting was held on 3/8/05. Comments
from Planning, Building & Safety, Fire, and TCSD were received from pre-DRC on 3/9/05. Planning
application process is ongoing.
7. Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail
This project will build portions of the equestrian and bike trails along Murrieta Creek within City
limits. The City has received a federal grant of $1,214,000. Caltrans has given the City the
"Authorization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering" We are working with US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACOE) and Riverside County Flood Control to coordinate the trail design with the
Murrieta Creek Improvement project. The City received comments from Caltrans on the Preliminary
Environmental Study (PES) on April 22, 2004. The Natural Environmental Study (Minimal Impacts)
(NES (MI)) was submitted to Caltrans on April 7, 2004, no comments have been received to date.
The PES response to comments was completed and resubmitted to Caltrans on September 23,
2004. The City received comments from Caltrans on January 7, 2005 forthe PES, NES (MI) and the
ISA. These comments were addressed and revised documents were submitted to Caltrans on Feb.
7, 2005.
8. State Route 79 South Medians
Under this project medians will be constructed on State Route 79 South within the City of Temecula
limits. PDC is making the 1 st plan check (30%) corrections.
9. Guardrail Installation and Replacement On Rainbow Canyon Road
In this project, old guardrails will be replaced and new guardrails will be installed in needed locations
on Rainbow Canyon Road within the City of Temecula. Final package for PS&E certification and
Request for Authorization (to construct) is to be submitted to Caltrans in late March. We anticipate
advertisement for construction bids in June.
10. Rancho California Road Widening, Old Town Front Street to 1-15 (Southside)
This project will provide a right turn lane for southbound 1-15 motorists and explore the possibility of
providing a dual left turn lane from westbound RCR to southbound Front Street. Alternatives study
is complete and the City has chosen alternative no. I. (widen the south side of the entire length
between Old Town Front and 1-15). An MND (CEQA) was completed and a Notice of Determination
was sent to the County on 10/11 /04. Right of Entries to perform a geologic investigation have been
received on the roadway embankment (two property owners) and the work. Staff met with Denny's
manager and the work scheduled for the end of March.
11. Main Street Bridge Over Murrieta Creek (Replacement)
This project will replace the existing Main Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek. The freeboard issue
that was a potential stumbling block has been resolved, and the bridge profile will remain
unchanged. The design process is ongoing; consultant is working toward 70% design. The last
design progress meeting was held on 2/15/05. The updated project schedule has 70% design plans
submitted to the City by 04/05.
R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2005Vanuary-Febmuy.doc
12. City Maintenance Facility and Corporate Yard
Under this project, an expansion of the maintenance facility will be built on the property adjacent to
City Hall. The consultant is progressing with the schematic design with the next submittal scheduled
for May. The parking lot is to be bid within the next 2 months. Coordinating existing and needed
utility services is on -going.
13. Santa Gertrudis Bicycle/ Trail Undercrossing at Margarita Road
This project will construct a trail for bicycles and pedestrians along Santa Gertrudis Creek under
Margarita Road. The first utility notice has been sent out. The consultant is preparing the first plan
submittal.
14. Diaz Road Realignment
Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road.
Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. 95% project design plans have been sent to the
utility companies and 95% PS&E has been sent to in-house reviewers. The irrigation and
landscaping will need to be re -designed to meet the agreement provisions between the City and the
Business Par Association. Right of Way acquisition process is ongoing.
15. Bus Bench Upgrades
Under this project, bus benches and shade structures will be installed and existing ones will be
upgraded at various locations. The design and locations were approved. Staff is in the final stages
of preparing the construction bid documents including ADA and permitting requirements.
Authorization to Bid the project was received from City Council on February 22, 2005 and the project
should go out to bid in the next few weeks.
16. Localized Storm Drain Improvements
This project will fix the drainage problem at the south end of Front Street (at the MW D easement).
Baseline right of way and utilities are established. Staff is preparing a conceptual design for
presentation to MW D (since it will be on top of their waterline).
17. Traffic Signal at SR79 South and Country Glen Way
Under this project, a traffic signal will be installed on State Route 79 South at Country Glen Way.
Now that City is in control of SR-79 south, project is being re -drafted and redesigned to City
standards and will be bid as a City project.
18. Long Canyon Detention Basin - Access Road
This project will construct an access road to the Long Canyon Detention Basin being maintained.
Plans and specifications are 90% completed and it is anticipated that this project will go out to bid
this summer. Winter rains have affected the project conditions and the scope of work will need to be
reevaluated.
19. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - FY 2004/ 2005
This project continues the annual pavement rehabilitation program for City streets. Project scope
focuses on Ynez Road, approximately between Rancho California Road and Solana Way. Baseline
R:\MonthlyActivityReport\CIP\2005\Jmuary-Febmary.doe
mapping is complete. PS&E is 30% complete. NOE has been filed w/County. Advertising is
anticipated in mid -May.
PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE
1. 1-151 SR 79 South Interchange -Project Report (PR)
This project will modify the 1-15/ SR 79 South Interchange to accommodate projected future traffic.
This is the next step of project development after the completion of the Project Study Report. The
Design Cooperative Agreement has been executed with Caltrans. The Professional Services
Agreement with RBF Consulting to prepare the Project Report was approved by City Council
February 22, 2005. A Kick-off meeting is scheduled for March 23, 2005.
2. French Valley Parkway Overcrossing and Interchange, Project Report (PR), Plans
Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Preparation
This project will construct an interchange between Winchester Road Interchange and the 1-15/1-215
split. The consultant submitted a screen check for the Project Report (PR), New Connection Report,
Fact Sheet, Flood Plain and Scour Analysis Report, and Traffic Operations Analysis to both FHWA
and Caltrans and M&N has received a few comments. The draft Project Report was submitted to
Caltrans at the end of December 2004. The PR is under review by the State. Comments were due
back at the end of February. The Consultant is working on addressing the comments that were
received.
3. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula City
Limits and Diaz Road Extension
This study will determine the alignment and location of the Murrieta Creek crossing between
Winchester Road and the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz
Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Riverside
County Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. The Consultant and Staff met
with Riverside County Flood Control to discuss possible alignments. The consultant is currently
awaiting data from Riverside County Flood Control in order to complete the work on the first draft of
the alignment study. In order to proceed with the design of Diaz Road Extension for the proposed
college, the alignment study was restarted with the existing information. The consultant is preparing
a base map for the Diaz Road extension alignment.
PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENDED OR ON -HOLD
1. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15
This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit ramp for
Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit -ramp at the Santa Gertrudis
Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is
revisiting the merits of this project in light of the Project Study Report for French Valley Parkway
Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to
accommodate the new Interchange. This project is suspended indefinitely.
R:\MonthtyActivityReport\CIP\2005UanuaryTebmary.doc
14
U
W
2
111
H
LL
O
W
W
S
N
N
y
W
w
a
Y
2O
J
F
Z
O
2
_y
_O C
m= O
O O
N
E
M
E
0
NO . Op
(yy�c
E
Do
c
mD
K m
=0C
O c o
°
?S
ogyn
d
N
%
C O LN O`
>
p
wO10
E p
O
E
�mTum
a c C o
-
D c
TO
D
y
p 15
N
D
E
Q w m y v
O.S mmoa
Eo
-mCc
Qm
i1
q
�o
c
n6 m
0
y E C
d o>
C> -0y i
O m `•
C N L
C m O c
C
8'0
y
�pCNO
CNym TA
N m
>
m10>V_O
mONC
�m
mM~
'i 3L
N
44
S Z
C
O
rU.or c
O .-
NDm 6
C ._ m
L' O N m
D v v-
cL�
p
NXmrjV
O.N ui
O
Fm O
2
d
?DC+ 5.
UCmp'aE
c C2
NOI�
QOIC�
o M
E
E
mv
pm
cjm
g 8ma
N
ad
mry
Q
m
0maiN
aO
s o Y
oT
L
oo oo
c2ic
E m
m>D o
io a
m m 15
o
, y
mN -
o Em
o
v0
N
Eow
cv oa
2o
�
v�N$3-
E=
Zm
coJrnQ
N
,.Bo
v
0:oD$
pgD ay'0
HrNo
cN
E
mm
0�
$
CU
=o%
o E
O
L`
a.2
C
nd
10c
O O m
U
89
3Q o
ct o
Ec 3
cy
mrn
ac
N vns
N D
o r p
90
ac
`o
a .ao
SE mc o
an
`°c`m
v D v 3
m¢
N
c m `o
cm
c o L❑ N
0 So mm'
2ov
Z2o
Eoy
DF1v0J
t~d
atmuc
n�Cm'
ory
nU`p2
�8OCm
5
mN
O
AoSm.nc
r' m
mpOl
r E
mc2Tll
mpFJ
i; NL
Qmo
Cno
O
m
m
0
mE
mLi.a
. CLo°
v v
D"'_C
c p m
mOD
--Dmt�
m E m
HEc
v
`
�m
c p
FovON
U
TO m
JpO v
NS
F J m
>
>�
m
ee
i
s
o
X
0
X
0
e
0
S
0
sQ iL
,
:U
X o
X o
X o
X o
X o
X
�i
m
m
m
va
vu
mu
m
ME
D
O
Q�
m
c
au
FvNd
m%nd
C
m
N
N
C
�
�p
N
m
Ot
m
OI
�
N
ry
D
Q
y
(J
m E
O m
tm0
N
O
01 O
'E
a o v
m m
OC r D.�
oCC L m rnoC
N
m
y
Z
Z
p
rnU N'Fr
.N.
pxo�
WC
O U
cai
c
CEm
Z'u0
mmmw
c
mdo
Co U o c
of
>Yao
K q
of
E
y O
v K`
m
c O
E m
a O
T J x
T=
t
a
m
p Q r
m
T a
p
V
°1w
N� c
o�ao0c0
mY E
U"zD
cmEm
L> o�c
mmavi
L>Oa
m
�a
0v
FVF
Q rn
X `o ,
w
m 2 U L
c
T J m
�° 3 °'
T o o t
m3 v
E
..
m Q u
zss
�j
o
m E
o o
K
m E
E 0'm
0 c' Tp
0U`o maxi
m
3 v
m
or
m
-2`m
m
.y "
4
Z
m?
o NU
E c 3
m� y v
adU�.
icvo
m�� o
m
mQ
aaN
cup
om�paM
c L D D
E o
m E c o
m
m y E
mew
c o
(i
ii
y
o c rn
3 o v c
c v p
c v Y
O
c'- m
�d00:
3 T u
.3
W
0)
�
a2
�
n
ai
a°
�0
N
¢C
>>
o
O�¢o
o
5800
Phi
a
U
tU
Q
❑
x
(�y
U
o
O
IL
a
0
a
Go O
LL O
ON
r
N `
w
Q
IL
U
w
2
w
LL
O
y
T
I—
W
W
m
N
N
co
W
w
a
Y
2O
I
J
m
z
O
2
N
w
O
w
IL
w
F-
z
w
2
w
O
w
ac
C
Q
'.7
Z
C A =
ca_
N W O
m2`
O N
t'j D
mS
a
o'er
N m
aL'
°
$
3°o
D 6
m�'3c
.a
D TC N
q
¢
7 a
oi�
0
8_ v
o
roJ
v $oU m
.
_E
m
a
c; E°yam
._
v 2
c
3m
_
a:oEN
ymN
•_
�Qo
D
w`nm
"p
mUr 06
m
T
n 6
m °
{««m 3T
$aC
WW IDSt
Zr,
OayN
dO
Q
O.E
O N;jM
E
Q an
E E
Dm<O¢
? mfE
m o-
m
U >raUam
E m_
5a
v"c ,;$ 2
N E
S �L v
ESL«
$yD rn'R
_a
En0o E
.ram w
n
ac `° `v0
mp.
�E"-'
F
g 10 g'mv
Dv._
o
o f
D mODN
o m m
o
8No
cam ym
y00crnLc
�$o
>.SEc
m0mES
VI
a 3 m.c
OMo
am%
v N
rz 0
E
°m$
.°�
a 0a$n8o
mam
.S5N o
"
vE
od
¢CE
m.vmc_c.
'
om&w
T
ENN2
_c3
c
pN
mTcMW
8
D
N m
U6E
m m
_
m80
iccn
m
N c
c ml N a
0 0
0
N (
O E N
C p
m
Vm
v�
p
me
EO
0
N
E $Cp3
E
c L✓ a Cp t
w 0
o
m 1-
D
d 15 0EDVO
>>v ���Rppp m
>y3'«°0
UO
LN
m m u> >
m1b 9ON
c D
m
o .p
L YC
a
T'jmd
mmC{pc
«m N
nS
Emrn
E
mN
L
m
ano
¢°y
VOU
m
O
qN
v.E
2E mo
Q
>f
2
m N
L m
m
3 O
O m N
0
Q
oa
N
at
W
T
O
2
N
N
O
x
O
U
m'
O18
m
Cl
(p
m
m
-
o
�
m
c
*A
m
a
m
c
m
o
o
m
rn
L
• N
C
m
U
J
U
r
m
o m
4
o
w
U
N
¢mil
O
C-M
«ii
2
O
N
m
D O
N
Em¢
2
NU
N
M0
n
o
E p
oc
E
u
m
'SN
�
3D-
U'
t°>0
m
m;m;
oU
u>
c
Dmd
<omvc
Go
2
a
a'Q
mam3
L
O
N
NO
.
Oa
U)
m C m
o i
iN
n3
°mvc
@
�i
go
B
rov`
n
v«
L
E
rrn
u
aU
m
imm>U §0
U
aUU
O
�
a
as
w
a
a
a
a
per'.
a
a
;a
00 N
LL N
On
M �
L O
a
w
W
W
I=
V/
U)
N
LU
CD
w
a
Y
gJ
Z
WO
22
LU
F '
LL y
OU
�w
O
Vw
(L
U)
Z
W
2
W
O
m
IL
2
o I Z
a! e be
O O V
R? W
IL
m
M
a
C
O
N
D
cl
d C Z
d N d d« >° 2-- pE
L, N L N N J 0 E « E !- O to
d O
LL$ Z odd
a C N d d d C C a -a N S° O V V C N M m c K
z oM> d E c c. $ D D E > d �' c a
f7 E o
BK U
E
d mZ0° DA 'n
°jd E 0ai
g cv�a >' 8
0oE agi>¢
E N> n
D N d y�j
0-a 5 D$ a=° c" m d m E a c .- @- m„
O c D d
—�ddyDC m�d d c _npvmUD °
M ¢ dE a o d c
wo$Dimo 02.50d j m .a ; m
m ~g
UE°`
Z o«w8m
On
E ¢ d c
.E .3 $$? o o n ❑ n. d 3 w$ 4 E FL o N� m U E
0 3 d c¢« m O d N d> - E'$ y c f a c y a LL n
t�Eo
om D 2d E mE3 ow!D%w>Q o � N i
.c
4
c� S' ,N, d❑ O' d 3 aDi « d U vmi
w
> d
np n
= n0 :£ myN95y-d= oaOrn N >da mM
y o, a E?¢ y .� MEN �' 9 3 m m 6 3 c c M 9 N m <� c m
(O7 M m;B c ca
E C j d V s a V a m o m udi y U n c m `d c o« a c m m
`gF-�dcmw Lii cDg«m�m QTLLT m oU
5�c,c_ €2`U UErnmm�a1 a�af horn$ ctm+�'°
E 3 nm d00 6 NNm N m L O •• O¢
d ¢OdM
O1°1
N
l0+!
2
2
T
001
M D
T O
OO1! t�
s
u«
9
r�«
y d q
=
N y m
m m
C d
Q
mm
O
p
o
w N
o
c
p
o
yO
D m
m m m
v
N_
w
U
> L
m
C
O
= O
N L U
N
L W
E°«
a a
i a
a
of
d m
d
N
P L J N
C
O C
D> m
y,v
E 2`9
pia y c
TE y U
w
> a
a c
0° U c
-
w
m «°
nD
O
nD0
C O
m
p N'm
M Q
D 0.9
N O)
N E w
mo
0
c 9
K n
m o o
m;> 3
,C MNN
n 'm
C
d
EN
m G D O
%
Vd
oo
c m o E
d=c
ao
i
i
�v�
i>
.�i IZ
4
N
Q
A d
O
O
p
O
co
LL
O
W
Q
a
U
w
2
w
F
LL,
O
V
N
O
O
N
r
Cl)
0
w
w
2
N
N
U)
W
/w
V
w
IL
Y
O
J
2
z
O
G
r
U
w
a
U)
z
w
2
NN7
w
IL
Q
-
c c
m oa o ,�
m
c
m
Yi
ma
w
g
c
2 c
m>a s13
wm
'w N
cL
F
D
w 3 c m
N$
vv Em
w$
E
V,
00
o
Umc
rn°
mwc
U Z V. m'
0-
°
f
c'n
n UAv
cw
tc $ "
e
�
i
a-Z c
o.
>
N
$nE
mw
FG
SL
T
8W
DO
�E
N p
r°�
'w
m$
ym
° N 3N
p
a
Dw
1y
O
EL E
°°Nm$ONVN
D a
Ov
w E
$
�
>
- 3
3u
S
C E TC
O a � D O C>
N
(pJ
N
Pd
Lg"N
aE0
c
Q
~N3
CE j>t.
U)i�a
M
c
�0$
.Sm
wmoa�
°U
cL
O y
E w
NN
EEo
v
3
'0
3
— L n
ay
dp°
pt Z N
��
—c
w
ew
U L0 3 3 p
OIw ou0
Ol L O
C_
H
���
N j
mNaNfn t3
wO
50
n
o
LN��
w t
$° y i V�i N a
m
o W
o a
�° c
°5
Omi o c O d m
o c E
�+ o
E i m
w
m rn
o
o d'
n Wit, m
rn LL c c v d E '-^
m .--
E E
m -Ji
d U c>
e A c€ om 2 0
w U y m m a 3
d
w m o�
H m
n c
w e
c m .m
n .c u !°
c c E o
J O>
C 2.' E 'Oj m H 6 N
N«
O
2 m 2 N 2p2
4 3 d L
w E w
TG
p�-
= w C— m 0 D
O J m
'o $
D
D ._
m m a
S m O v .�
E a o ty�« D
3
¢ w m
o.
°�
3 °'
m D Q
D c d
3 3 2 W d" N m
w n r 0e c D
6 w
m E
°l = c
'y° E O
g C L« O. N C
m rn a m
c O C
2 m
'-� O C
N
O N Ol d
m
U E C E N w^ N
S F
U J
O d N° Y N
n w
C C
Q J
N N w
'.UL'YE2^Comm
do
n"«2
mm�mmmmm
Do��
$D2
nsJ
nnyc
t>E �c'nm my
�K0 xUO m
�?`
7U
cnc
IL S$
tEEpcccEm
1-.J. U N m W m E
tdo
F'-Dn
ego
F wU
1E
f-U $
�m0
rnLam
aa
oa
O
O
O
O
O
EE
WW
iU
n y
m Q
=
9
O
m m`
A
m
t9
x
D
a
m
m
y
c
c
W
rn
H
o
K
3
r
w
U
m°
N
O
c>
_
W
=
m 'C
Cop
Y I
O
C
O�."
d 0
m 0
m U
N 9 �p
o
U
m e
C
[ :
F V
a m
��m
o H
K£ E
O 3
o
41
@
10 0' �'
rn o
vW
Z
L�'n
�D
m
biyDH
E m w
c E
2 E
w Z
Tg
m w
w
v
r4
,ot�m
m cm
o.m
p
C
U
'f2
E C
O 00
C
1��
WO
D'O.
o05
bm
mD
L°=°
m N N
N N
T w
U N N
= p, N
w°
S N
E
N'
�Y
(9Uco)
8
U
°z
W
N
s
m
4
4
O
N
N
a
a a,
LL N
0n
N r
V O
a
W
W
_
U)
w
U)
W
w
IL
Y
g�
�Z
Z
w0
22
H
0 L)
W
w
V w
IL
y
H
Z
W
2
W
0
w
a
2
O
C
O
W N
v c
D
u
ry
c m
O—o
c
n
v
.'-^ 3
0
.9 8
c
v
o Ea
v«..
8
"-
'.
O U0
a
LU
ON
N
N E C N
`
.n�
dl N
O.�
v
c o
a�3
o
a
a
vU
c Tc
{]D o
y 10
D N y`
IQ
N 10
N N N
3
D
y c
U Q D
r n
y
n a
L O
c>
D_
o
>;0
$ v
aV E
c
y
oE'8
a3rn
`o
0
Evg'g'
0.9
c°
..F
ME o o
a v
n v
3
m
IS 0
0 m A
t� O
OOi N
W
3 o 5
c 0 2
o f
m E=
Z
V
pE
O O
r!
NE
y
C
«Otli $
;
6
oL m
M
0
_p
5
$
��
8.0
a
c 05
2
ii aEi o,3
v
N n N
U D
Q
8
N
m
N C 'C t0
v N$
OI
O
t0 N
02
I
D O
nO'
y
y O$
W O
O
OI D w O N N
v Z 0> 0 8 m
t � n� E 3 m
4 L y N N N C
¢ m m E m
N Q 8 C D N O
N a U N N fn
N d D y E y C
- n �..
2 °C'+a3
L IU
IL y a D y d y
g m e v 5
j c _ a 0 v�
N LL 3 p Qcq
Z'O NNLL��U
UN my5v u
EKI-
F-
N N E LL N_ 2 L
2
A caac�`--ow8
N ,2 C N N O W
O y C« ry C
r 5 c m 12 i v E v m
N c
L N O
D D � 0 0 .y
O 5 p�'pEcp A Tvc 'N m
0
V3 V N D« O N N
L N 8V1 Q'£'-
y F N LL v N« y
y £
�szN�yo�o
`c r 8.08av_ EZIO E
3 0@?> N N A N
R_ 0 5 3 a
8cam Z,08 Howe
o c o m m
N O� N W �y
5 D `O D o E n
.y D N C Ol p. N
�N� O `� N« A C
acg ti � � ro v5
CC C
O
c m D>
0
c�
v
w m 3 y M
y H e
y O C «0 C N L O "JO
9 E> E€
D c 0
m��. c 8 ,��' a 0
2 I z I Z I z I Z I II o I n I n
p
Ow
�
W
R
c
.22
a
A
h N T 9
A a a v
3 3 3 3
a a a a
Lu
E 0
2
a y
� 2
M Z
c Z
K
E a
> W
a
uj
V
N 7
3 CL
a
T'o A'o
O W O a
s
a
>
T
O
= Q
(9
0
10
Q
y
m
D
o
D
9
�
o
c
o
E
c
3
0
m
uyo
0
0'
o
N N
« c
v
0
o0
v
O
rn-
v
m
O E
0
J
N y
E
Date
�
v m
m MZ
U m
D c
�0
d3
o m
v o
E
N C
d K
u.=2
�H
N
O U
N
�
Y
N
a
N
10
Ci
e
d
e
c„o,cOM9E
a
E c
m 9
0 00
t a
0
lv]� u A`ef u
m
m
0
a
E
aJ N
LL O
0
W
W p
Q
a
H
W
W
_
N
N
W
I�
V
w
IL
Y
0
3
J
g=
�Z
z
w0
22
P
y
LL
OV
W
0
V �
a
L)
r
z
w
2
m
IL
2
a d o E
m
o
of°'@£a %m nS w ym
T 5 m
a�W13 o u m m£ o c o
0. «° N m N N W .N a n
om t c3
°` E m 0,
m u
Z¢ L°r.,m. o Ea EQ m> $ Lrnm
..... = o a a r U o c 3 Q r
a d v m c o m o 8 .w @ m a «
op Uo �H JE ,m >�5 m c8 d
V a L 2 ¢° C O m 0 0. H L R c N O« y
°
V O O
p N.OU•rv_�� r rC J ] m NNm°LN jm y L
a
yN N OCc> n aE S@ou m >N
Nm O ] Q m L O C U
Q Off « =a z 2 m UD!^ O 6 Nat F� O 12 Q
U by
a_
Ca z z z z z z z z z z z z
x
xr x x x x
v
09
t t u d u 2
ax x 'm 3 5c a N = a a
OV `mx x ti ti Ny mN� m �•. t `m E`dE
0. Z u u ti N m (9 m ti u C Q
¢ H d
m �
O p m an d c c
7 £ E rn m E c
� � a
i m
v.� J OI 6 p L O1 [0
7
d
p N
_ ,° c 4: _ a mo 0 o c
°
jjL�i Uyy}I 3 m c a
F. fvi.. NN O O (n
a' ` 'C m y m
a s im` c o E rn r ro m' y Q a o m a> d
T 9 W T a c
m ¢ 5 c w
OO ? Ao m c 0 om a m roo �0' °
a V E > m m
m 0
Q �
v o
x W
O N N N N
CL 3 3 3 C a w a p� a a a
0
m
a
R
:i
W
2
W
H
LL
O
W
W
2
co
N
N
LLI
N�
a
Y
O
J
2
H
z
O
H
V
W
ce
a
U)
FM
z
W
m
W
O
Ix
a
9
mi
crnc
m �
o
m
mmo
8
E
C
m
O
o
o�
i0
$
c£
d
vi
3
`v
E m
m
Q
m
c
m
-.
d m '8 vi
m c o
c
y 'S
m
,'
Q
m
E
U
n
E
= n
J
3
m
2•
c
�'
L
�-
r
Z... O N
Y y
L
d
Q
£
a
J
0 3
.y
C m
m
J
O
Uca�
mi
y°
E
3
'3
03
n
v
yy
c
m
_ d
;.
C
a
O
d
E
O" y
ay
L LL
C
°
E
m
E o C�
z d o
m m
n
as
L
C��
om
o
a
3
£
cm
._ m
c
°
m
O_
a
3
d
o'-
J o
S m
m
E
e
o
4
t'9
�
O
'
�
2n
U
cvmn
°
Oo
mim
n
no
dawLL
3
mo
o
0.-0O
Wts
J.
°O
a°
antd
d
oo
o
v
EE
n
rn£
d
Jvo
N
co
m m
d
d 8
c
Onrn>
m
JD
E
m
d
�.
dy;m�
3N m
w
Sad
mt
c v
_
rn3 Am
'w�i
o
�
cm
and
o.y
m
�m
E
c ooa
3
O'98g
N E L c
J m F
rn"
c
N
c o
,2
O_
m-
O O
a N
y£ m
O N
wn
r
O. C
y
nU
O d d°
°£m
h
y
Lp,
ioc
�vy"
O mC
d d
a
d>T
u
dm
e
of
O
wj
cN
8
Nw
yd
SO
£N>
S
dd`
om
O
N
d
e
C y a 9
L
L y
0
Q m 9=
0 7
d E
m.0 N
L J
y1
;C J
d
ocm�
o£
m
n£o3€
nE
03
£ay
dE
o
U$
O10
S S K
m n
= a
a?
Q m¢
3
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
zz
z
zz
O i,C,a
6U
c
C
c
P
P
z
'z
z
z
z
z
z
z
9'
O ,�
o`
o
O
U
a
a
a
>
o
C
o
G
C
G
O
O
o
a m
m m
d
0
m
��
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
�• (zij
�
7
7
7
7
7
7
>
>
l
d
o
y
y
C
E
m
o
m N
_a
W
NoN
U
Fa-
C m N
m
c
O c�
c
0
a�i
„moo
E
a
a
own
LL;
dy
d
W
>
d
Q
c
y ofc2�d
W
12
z
mmd
03
cmWya
Km
m
a
8
o f
o
fG
c
ydmd
yc
m
E
E(aa$
O
m
m�
K
C
8 m
N
E£
O
O
O
z `•
c
O
m C
d
c
o
c 'L'
y
m MI
m E v
o
m
O
C (n CO
a
{p
ue.
W
_
cdm
E i y
c
dm7
n
K=t
n
y
m cy
cW�-orn
Oad
CC
wo
¢.LLa-id
nm
Emarn
d
oR
mm
c
c
o
�ani�
mK
ammrn
W
c
£y
0
C
mc
d
o
N
W
mEK cm
E
N
E
c
vn
`
E
rN
NJo8
3xmri
va
I-c-mommmo8
L
c6ccJ
a
2
ryi
ujy
O
toc
Q
O
7F,
N
N
W
>
>
•
•
R
O
N
N
°
°
tR+l
m
>
m
a
0
M
a
00 C
LL
oN n
m �
O
IL
r
w
w
2
N
w
w
a
Y
O
3
g=
�Z
Z
W O
22
H �
O V
w
U �
a
H
Z
w
2
w
��/
a
m
C O N
O s p
N
N W N
O>
E
N N N
C t 0
C N
N
a�
,a N 3
m
€
y
8 E
a
c 3$
3vv
o
mma�i
fDaP
.jm
c N a
$ c c
t3 v
iio'u
mm=
U)0
oN.�'
N '.0 D
O N
4 N
C
ppC
Qd
'Cqq N
p D N�
T
W
m L
o
N
W
'.F
fn C
owv
O L
9om
'
w o
oc
cLv,a
v7a
L 0
�,
$o
w E
30
m
aai
3 m
mog
E
Eo
j N O C
N E
>
O C N
O N
c y c¢
'm c
>Sv
¢c ma
Z
oa
U
[5^7
c
c
'o
"o
m7 O
O
O
x
m
m
w�
m
a
80
6
0
0
d N
08
a
T'Z
a
C
O
v�z 'zN
o
sa
H
m
y�y
W
N d
¢
{1
O
O
U
O N
m
6
C
m
N O
c
NC
5
N
N
b
h
'o
'0
>
a
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: 6qo Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: March 2, 2005
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - February, 2005
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel
for the month of February, 2005:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
if. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
III. ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs
B. Total Tons
IV. CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations
B. Total S.F.
VII. STENCILING
A. 0 New and repainted legends
B. 295 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
111
4
9
0
4,079
36
212
0
26
1,671
RAMAINTAIM QAMM200 M\FEBRUARY
O O O O O O O O O O
00) co� l0 In -ct m N
O v
O N
Vt U
Lh �D
69 69 69 £q 6 M V 6 " 6 69 V
N
O
O
LU
W
0
O
Z
H
U
O
H
a
w
J
W
Z
'a
x
IL
a
m
w
LL
Z
Q
In
7 M
ro
N
a� �
0�
o�w
ro �
o q
w
°o
crUU
4l y
E ti ~ P y
C T N T u>
�zti¢v°'4ioz
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2005
DATE
; LOCATION.
WORK COMPLETED'
02/02/05
OAK CLIFF AT ROCK BLUFF
REMOVED
5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/03/05
MARGARITA AT WINCHESTER
REMOVED
8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/03/05
LONG CANYON CREEK PARK
REMOVED
30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/07/05
MAIN STREET BRIDGE
REMOVED
34 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/07/05
BUTTERFIELD BRIDGE
REMOVED
40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/07/05
WINCHESTER BRIDGE
REMOVED
82 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/07/05
NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY BRIDGE
REMOVED
137 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/07/05
WALCOTT
REMOVED
30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/07/05
1 RANCON BUILDING
REMOVED
15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/08/05
1 BEDFORD COURT
REMOVED
24 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/09/05
VIA PUERTA AT CAMINO VERDE
REMOVED
70 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/10/05
PREECE AT TIERRA VISTA
REMOVED
22 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/14/05
MIRA LOMA AT EDISON SUB -STATION
REMOVED
125 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/16/05
McCABE
REMOVED
7 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/17/05
VIA RIO TEMECULA
REMOVED
249 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/24/05
41935 4T" STREET
REMOVED
10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/24/05
VERDADERO PLACE
REMOVED
12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/24/05
TAJO AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
REMOVED
9 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/24/05
I-15 AT MAIN STREET
REMOVED
7 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/24/05
SANTACECILIA
REMOVED 1
50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/25/05
VIA MESIA AT CAMINO HERENCIA
REMOVED
90 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/28/O5
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT CALLE TAJO
REMOVED
20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/28/05 1
HONORS AT CRYSTALAIRE
REMOVED
165 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
RWA1N'1'AIMWKCMPL7 MGRAMTI\04.05TEBRUARY
DATE
LOCATIONS
02/28/05
SANTA CECILIA AT LOMA LINDA
REMOVED
10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/28/05
TARGET CENTER
REMOVED
40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
02/28/05
MIRALOMA
REMOVED
380 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
LL-
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 1,671
TOTAL LOCATIONS 26
R:NIAINTAIMWKCMPLTD\GRAPnTIMOMF BR UARY
Requests to Speak
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
Date J I wish to speak on Agenda Item No.
For V� Against
C C V'- . l U"('-�
/ �P'LE/ASSE PRINT /
Addreca•
Phone: &
The Chairman or presiding officer will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public
podium and state your name and address for the record.
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name.