Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout081490 CC Minutes MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD AUGUST 14, 1990 An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:01 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding. PRESENT: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore Munoz, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCA TION The invocation was given by Pastor T. J. Mercer, Rancho Community Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Birdsall. PRESENT A TIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Parks proclaimed October 21-28, 1990 "Red Ribbon Week". Mayor Parks proclaimed October 1990, as Energy Awareness Month in Temecula. PUBLIC COMMENTS Pat Keller, 39695 Creative Drive, asked the following questions: 1. Will the City prepare a status of the City report, and if so when will this occur? Minutes 8/14/90 2. A status report on the parks is reported to be forthcoming. When will this be completed? 3. Why are two Assistant City Manager's needed? 4. What can be done to increase tourism in this community? 5. Is it possible to use one of the old theaters in the community to create a community theater? 6. If development fees were not collected from the County, is it possible to receive land in lieu of money? 7. With the increasing number of claims against the City, what is being done to alleviate these problems? 8. Why are positions on City committees not open to a broader base of citizens? Ray McLaughlin, 30025 Front Street, asked the status of Parcel Map No. 23371-10, which is affecting the residents of La Serena Way. He stated he learned this map has not received final City approval, and was approved by the County in 1981. He stated many items were approved before Temecula experienced major changes in traffic and the environmental impact that were not anticipated in 1981 and asked Council to address these problems when it comes before Council for final approval. He also pointed out that this project has been conditioned to make a cash contribution to the Road Department for the purpose of widening Rancho California Road overcrossmg. Council member Munoz objected to an article in the Press Enterprise stating Council member Moore, Councilmember Lindemans and Council member Munoz violated the Brown Act. He stated they attended a bus tour and no City business was conducted. He further explained that the press accompanied the three councilmembers on this bus tour and were given 24 hour notice prior to the tour. CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Dixon requested the removal of Item No. 18 from the consent calendar to be continued to the meeting of August 28, 1990. Mayor Parks requested the removal of Item No. 15. Councilmember Lindemans requested the removal of Item No.8 and Council member Munoz requested the removal of Items No. 14 and 17. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Council member Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items No. 1-7,9-13 and 16 as follows: Minutes 8/14/90 2 1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2. Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of July 24, 1990 as mailed. 2.2 Approve the minutes of July 30, 1990 as mailed. 2.3 Approve the minutes of July 31, 1990 as mailed. 3. Resolution Supporting the Relocation of the Space Systems Division From Los Angeles Air Force Base to March Air Force Base. 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-84 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE RELOCATION OF THE SPACE SYSTEMS DIVISION FROM LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE TO MARCH AIR FORCE BASE. 4. Claim for Damages - David Cuevas (a minor) 4.1 Deny the claim for damages. 5. Claim for Damages - Mayra Cuevas (a minor) 5.1 Deny the claim for damages. 6. Claim for Damages - Marquez vs. City of Temecula 6.1 Deny the claim for damages. Minutes 8/14/90 3 7. Claim for Damages - Paul M. Stuart and Nicholas Stuart (a minor) 7.1 Deny the claim for damages 9. Appeal No.5 for Plot Plan No. 11756 9.1 Uphold the Appellant's appeal and approve Plot Plan No. 11756. 10. Resolution to Revise Method to Prepay Demand Payment Less Than $1,000 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE FOR PREPAYMENT OF DEMANDS. 11. Resolution Approving Payment of Demands 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHmIT A. 12. Animal Control Agreement 12.1 Authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with the County of Riverside to provide Animal Control Services in the City of Temecula for one year. 13. Three-Year Cooperation Agreements Urban County Qualification 1991-1993 13.1 Authorize the City Manager to enter into a cooperative agreement with the County of Riverside to participate in the Urban County Program. Minutes 8/14/90 4 16. Public Use Permit No. 675 16.1 Receive and File. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None 8. Resolution Establishing the City's Appropriation Limit for Fiscal Year 1990-91 Councilmember Lindemans asked if the decision of LAFCO establishing the Gann Limit should be appealed by the Council rather than staff trying to have it amended. He stated Murrieta has a far greater spending limit based on a LAFCO determination one year later. Mary Jane Henry stated she is in the process of appealing the $8 1/2 million spending limit, set by LAFCO. She explained John McTighe is putting together a report that will determine what the Gann Limit should be. She said the City Attorney has recommended the City adopt a temporary Gann Limit which can be revised once the appeal process is completed. City Attorney Fields reported that the procedure will be as follows: Mr. McTighe is doing a study to determine what the appropriate Gann Limit should be, when this study is complete it will be brought to the City Council. The City Council will then conduct a public hearing and consider that report. If adopted a validation action will be brought to get a court approval of more appropriate limit. Once that process is complete, the City will have a new Gann Limit. Mary Jane Henry said a temporary Gann Limitation should be in compliance with the State Code at this time. Councilmember Lindemans asked that the word "temporary" be added to the Resolution. City Manager Dixon explained the appeal of the Gann Limit is a two or three step process. The City needs to raise the limits based on what the law will allow. The City has asked the County not only to review the way the Gann limit was set, but also how the tax rate was set. He reported a response has not been received. Mr. McTighe's report will be Minutes 8/14/90 5 brought before Council and a public hearing will take place. After the public hearing a court validation will be sought. He explained that tonight only step one is proposed. Councilmember Lindemans moved, Council member Birdsall seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 90-85 with the addition of the word "temporary" in the title and body of the resolution. The resolution is entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 1990-91. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None 14. Cable Television Consulting Services Council member Munoz asked if the $15,000 for consulting services is to be retrieved by the City through the fee process. Secondly, should this have gone through a bidding process before selecting TMC? Joe Hreha, Manager of Information Services, stated the $15,000 is to appropriate funds not included in the budget. The money is to be reimbursed from the Cable TV companies who apply for an application, and enter into a negotiation agreement. He replied two consultants recommended by the League of California Cities were contacted for proposals. TMC worked with the company currently applying and staff felt they were in the best position to evaluate the application and do the franchise agreement. Council member Munoz asked if the fee collected added revenue to the City or if the fee only covers the consulting fee. Mr. Hreha stated it covers the consultants fees, City Attorney fees and processing fees. He explained that when negotiations are entered into, a $4,200 non-refundable fee is collected. Minutes 8/14/90 6 Mayor Parks asked how this fee compares with the County franchise fee. Mr. Hreha explained the City fee is higher because the Cable TV Ordinance is much more complex and requires a greater amount of time and work to administer. Council member Lindemans asked if a second company is granted a franchise to operate, would it be advantageous to move quickly so City streets are not opened again. Mr. Hreha answered that a paragraph is included in the ordinance which states all development must have capability to support two lines so streets will not need to be reopened. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Munoz to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING APPLICATIONS FOR CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISES Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROPRIATING $15,000 FOR CABLE TELEVISION CONSULTING SERVICES The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None 15. First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23211 Gary Martin, 30601 Cabrillo Avenue, representing Marstan Homes, requested City Council receive and file this tentative map since the County of Riverside's Planning Commission has already heard this request. He stated he would like to correct a few Minutes 8/14/90 7 errors in the staff report. The application of extension was first filed October 19, 1989. He brought to the Council's attention that in January, 1990 a project was approved for 220 units next to this project that was not a vested map. He said this project is a vested map and already in existence. He said grading and loss of natural ridgeline has been approved by the Council for the adjacent project and a less dense project is currently being proposed for the site. Council member Birdsall moved, Councilmember Munoz seconded a motion to set this item for public hearing on August 28, 1990. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None 17. Rabies Vaccination Clinic and Dog Licensing Program Councilmember Munoz asked how the veterinarian for this program was selected. Joe Hreha stated this is part of the County of Riverside's Animal Control Agreement. He said the County is required to provide this service to the City of Temecula as part of the agreement. Emmet Gibson, the Animal Control Officer headed up this program and he contacted Doctor Daniel Pearson who volunteered to provide this service. Mayor Parks asked that staff contact the other veterinarians in the City and give them an opportunity to participate in this program. City Manager Dixon stated staff will be sure that Mr. Gibson has called all the veterinarians in the City to give them all the same opportunity to be involved. Council member Munoz asked that other veterinarians expressing an interest be placed on a list and rotated the next year. It was moved by Council member Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Munoz to approve the City co-sponsoring the vaccination clinic and licensing program. The motion was carried by the following vote: Minutes 8/14/90 8 AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None City Manager Dixon requested adding Item No. 24 to the agenda. He explained it is a matter that came to staffs attention after the agenda was prepared. It has to do with participating in the RTA Joint Powers Agreement and requires a 4/5ths vote. RTA meets on August 23, 1990 and Council will not meet again before that date which makes action necessary at this time. Council member Moore moved, Council member Birdsall seconded a motion to add Item No. 24 to the agenda based upon subsequent need. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None PUBLIC HEARING 19. Tentative Tract 21067, Revised - Third Extension of Time Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, stated this is a request by Kingsway Construction for a third extension of time to record the final map for Tract 21067. The project is a 104-lot single family subdivision with 17.7 acres of open space, located along the northerly side of Pala Road south of State Route 79. The applicant has requested an extension of time is to allow for the review of flood control and drainage plan issues. The concern of staff over the required bridge and street improvements, have prompted addition of a condition, requiring the applicant to submit a focused traffic study to address the project's impact on the existing alignment of Pal a Road and Route 79. In addition the report would also look at a fair share contribution of the cost of making those street and bridge improvements. He recommended Council grant the third extension of time for this project with the addition of the condition found on page five of the staff report. Minutes 8/14/90 9 Councilmember Lindemans stated that according to the staff report 82 % of the cost for widening the bridge is available through federal funding. He said this 82 % needs to be secured and the bridge widened prior to adding more traffic to the problem area. Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:50 PM. Marilyn Carney, 3838 Camino Del Rio, Suite 390, San Diego, representing Kingsway Construction Corporation, addressed the issue of Pala Road. She stated this project is part of Assessment District 159 and this district does not include money for bridges. She stated the developer will pay the fair share and requested that this be extended for the third time. Mayor Parks asked if she is in agreement with staff recommended changes. She stated the developer is in agreement. Councilmember Munoz asked for pictures of what the development will look like. He asked what the 17 acres of open space would look like. Ms. Carney introduced George Musser, Project Engineer, 2698 Mataro St., Pasadena, to answer further questions. Mr. Musser stated the open space is in the flood plain of Temecula Creek. He said this will remain open with no improvements at this time so if flood control improvements are needed, the land will be available. He also said this area will serve as a wildlife preserve. Council member Munoz asked if there is an area set aside for a neighborhood park? Mr. Musser answered this project has already been revised substantially and lots reduced to make land available for flood control. Mayor Parks declared a one minute break at 8:00 PM to change the tape. The meeting was resumed at 8:01 PM. Councilmember Munoz stated he felt staff should take advantage of the Quimby Act and set aside land for parks. Mayor Parks asked if this map falls within the Quimby Act designation? City Attorney Field stated this map came through the County prior to the adoption of the Quimby Act and unless the Council conditions this project tonight, it would not be subject to the current Quimby Ordinance. Mayor Parks asked the applicant if they would object to paying Quimby Fees, according to the current standard ordinance? Ms. Carney stated she would like to discuss the issue with the owners before giving a final answer. Minutes 8/14/90 10 Councilmember Lindemans asked if this could be moved off calendar for two weeks to add Quimby Fees and to the conditions of approval and asked that staff provide clearer information on whether the City has a working Quimby Act. Mayor Parks stated this Council wants to provide parks and maps are not going to be approved without the Quimby Act provisions being made a part of the conditions of approval. Ms. Carney stated she needed two weeks to discuss this matter and work out the details. Councilmember Birdsall said Council needs to make it clear that anything that comes before them must will be conditioned to include Quimby Act Provisions. This would make it clear to all applicants so it would not be necessary to continually send things back. City Manager Dixon stated that there are certain discretionary acts that the Council has. One is extension of time. Because it is a discretionary act, the Council has the ability to add conditions. If the applicant does not agree, a extension of time does not have to be approved. It was moved by Council member Birdsall, seconded by Council member Moore to continue the public hearing for two weeks to allow staff to add the Quimby condition. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None RECESS Mayor Parks called a recess at 8:24 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9: 10 PM following the CSD Meeting. COUNCIL BUSINESS 20. Organizational Structure and Salary Range for .lob Classifications City Manager Dixon reported this item has three issues that Council is asked to consider. Minutes 8/14/90 11 1. Restructuring of the organization. 2. Job descriptions that have not been approved. 3. A proposed salary range for those new positions. He explained that over the past 30 days he has given a great deal of thought to how best to serve this community and structure the organization to be responsive. He explained these changes are non-traditional, but structured so that all parts of the organization can be coordinated collectively. Whether the director of the grouping is called Director of Developmental Services or Assistant City Manager, is not important. The key factor is the functions being accomplished. He explained that the plan before Council tonight would split the organization in half; one for administrative support and one operations as it deals with developmental services. Number two, he explained there are a list of positions which the Council has not yet adopted. He said four or five positions need specific attention tonight, so that on-going recruitment may continue. Mayor Parks stated he would like to see this issue continued to a workshop meeting so that we can compare what is before the Council tonight to what has been previously approved. City Manager Dixon stated four positions need to be approved tonight so that these appointments can be made. Councilmember Birdsall said she agreed with the idea of the workshop. She asked for an overall picture of the entire structure for a basis of comparison. Mayor Parks called a one minute break to change the tape at 9: 15 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9: 16 PM. City Manager Dixon stated the intent was not to change positions approved by the Council, it is more in terms of functions and the grouping of these functions, with the latitude of adjusting positions within those functions. The intent is not to spend more but to spend less. Councilmember Birdsall asked which positions need to be approved tonight. City Manager Dixon said Chief Accountant, Director of Building and Safety, Director of Community Services and Senior Accountant are positions included in the 1990-91 budget but they have not had an approved title and salary range. Councilmember Munoz stated he felt salaries are too high, compared to other cities. He said he did not feel the City needs to pay these kinds of salaries to get good people. He said the City needs to be more in line with the private sector salary-wise. He suggested Minutes 8/14/90 12 hiring people who as responsibilities increased, could grow into their jobs, and suggested that the community of Temecula is a big draw for quality employees. City Manager Dixon explained that the proposed changes in the budget would decrease total appropriations not increase them. He stated that the City must be competitive to recruit and retain quality people. He said the City needs qualified journeymen in Planning and Building and Safety to get this City up and running in the manner which the citizens and Council desires. He stated these are not positions where people should learn on the job. Councilmember Munoz stated that if a wide range of people are interviewed, qualified people can be found without overspending on salaries. He requested using the median range of salaries, subject to adjustment when the Council has it's study session. Mr. Dixon reported that he would have to re-recruit the positions of Building and Safety Official and Director of Community Services. He explained the City has gone through a 45-day recruitment and selected the top applicants. He said the City has interviewed nine people and ranked the top three. Council member Munoz said he felt these ranges need to be set lower and people should progress up through ranges accordingly. Councilmember Birdsall asked if hiring is based on a scale according to experience. She said Council is not instructing Mr. Dixon to hire at the minimum of a job range, he is able to hire within a range. Council member Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to authorize the City Manager to hire four positions (Chief Accountant, Director of Building and Safety, Director of Community Services and Senior Accountant) at a salary as close to the minimum recommended ranges as possible. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Munoz ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to continue the item to a study session to consider the remainder of the policies at the earliest convenient date. Minutes 8/14/90 13 The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None 21. Change of Zone No. 5446 Gary Thornhill, Chief Planner, stated this Zone Change was approved at a public hearing on June 6, 1990. The ordinance was not introduced at that time. Staff recommended to read by title only and introduce the ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION NO. 5446, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK) TO CPS (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON 6.51 ACRES AT THE WEST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD. Councilmember Moore moved, Council member Birdsall seconded a motion to approve staff recommendation. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None Minutes 8/14/90 14 22. Development Agreement Procedures City Attorney Field reported that State Law requires the City Council adopt procedures for considering development agreements. The resolution before Council would adopt such procedures. He said the City has an application from Johnson and Johnson for a development agreement, and has scheduled a public hearing on this matter for August 28, 1990. It was moved by Council member Birdsall, seconded by Council member Moore to approve a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None 23. Flood Control Agreement for Mesa Homes; Tracts 24131, 24132, 24133, 24134 and 24135, Located North of Margarita and East of Paba Road Councilmember Lindemans moved, Council member Birdsall seconded a motion to approve staff recommendation as follows: 23.1 Approve the Flood Control Agreement between Mesa Homes, the Riverside County Flood Control District and the City of Temecula. 23.2 Approve the Memorandum of Understanding between Mesa Homes and the City of Temecula. 23.3 Authorize the Mayor to execute the same. The motion was carried by the following vote: Minutes 8/14/90 15 AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None 24. Riverside Transit Joint Powers Agreement City Manager Dixon reported at the Council Meeting of June 12, 1990, the Council appointed Council member Munoz to serve as a representative to the RT A. The RT A has informed us that the City needs to enter into an agreement to participate in the Joint Powers Agreement in order to have our representative seated. The next scheduled meeting is August 23, 1990, therefore this action needs to take place tonight. He recommended entering into the Joint Powers Agreement with RT A, appoint Councilmember Munoz and appoint an alternate member to that board. Councilmember Moore asked if the alternate needs to be a Council member . City Manager Dixon said this person needs to speak for the policy of the Council. Council member Lindemans suggested appointing the Mayor as alternate to be replaced when an alternate is chosen. It was moved by Council member Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve staff recommendation and appoint Mayor Ron Parks as alternate member as follows: 24.1 Enter into the Joint Powers Agreement of the Riverside Transit Agency. 24.2 Appoint a member of the Riverside Transit Agency Board. 24.3 Appoint an alternate member of the Board. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Munoz, Parks NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: None Minutes 8/14/90 16 Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Munoz seconded a motion to extend the meeting for 15 minutes to 10: 15 PM. CITY MANAGER REPORTS City Manager Dixon spoke in answer to questions raised by Pat Keller. He said a report will be coming soon regarding the status of parks and also the status of funding with the County. Tourism is important to this community, and Old Town needs to be looked at. Arts and Culture are also important and he suggested talking about establishing various committees. Mr. Dixon also said that 10 days ago the press came out with a report he was running for Council in Moreno Valley. He stated that this is incorrect and that papers were never filed. He said his commitment is to this community, not short term but long term. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Council member Moore requested staff distribute materials to the Council which she will make available on the downtown renewal program being undertaken in Lake Elsinore. Councilmember Birdsall requested the matter of securing a police dog for the Temecula Police Department be placed on the next agenda. Council member Munoz asked staff to report on the timing of the left turn pocket on Rancho California Road in front of the Woodcreek Apartments. He also requested that the City take steps to assure that all intersections are kept open during peak days and times when construction is taking place. Council member Lindemans asked that the matter of funding for the Temecula High School Marching Band banner be placed on the agenda. He also requested that staff provide the Council with copies of the minutes of all commission and committee meetings. Mayor Parks asked that a weekly status report be generated to keep Council informed on all projects in progress. He also requested an update on the status of the Sphere of Influence study and the radio tower move. Minutes 8114/90 17 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at 10:20 PM to a study session on August 21, 1990, 7:00 PM, Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, CA. The motion was unanimously carried. ~~. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATTEST: ~.-. .et.~.. Q ) Ju reek, Deputy City erk Minutes 8/14/90 18