Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout121504 PC Minutes ..:; .... MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 15, 2004 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:14 P.M., on Wednesday, December 15, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Olhasso led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Chiniaeff, Olhasso, and Chairman Telesio. Absent: Guerriero and Mathewson. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aqenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of December 15, 2004 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of October 6, 2004 3 Director's Hearinq Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for November 2004 MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve Item Nos. 1.1 and 3.1. Due to a lack of quorum, Item No. 2.1 will be rolled over to the following meeting. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner's Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. R:\MinutesPC\ 121504 1 COMMISSION BUSINESS Continued from November 17, 2004 4 Planninq Application No. PA04-0260. a Development Plan. submitted bv AGK Group LLC. for the addition of a third floor to each of the approved buildinqs 12. 17.27. 35 & 38 for a total of 20 new apartment units added to the approved 220 units for a total of 240 units. located on the southeast corner of Rancho California Road and Moraqa Road Associate Planner Kitzerow presented a staff report (of record), noting the following: . That the proposed project was presented to the Pianning Commission on November 17, 2004; and that staff recommended denial of the project based on the determination that it did not substantially conform to the approved project and is inconsistent with the Growth Management Action Plan and Multi-Use Traiis and Bikeways Master Plan . However upon receiving testimony, the Planning Commission voted to continue the item and requested that staff prepare a Resolution with Findings and Conditions of Approval for the project . That staff has worked with the applicant to include a condition to ensure that the project will be consistent with the Bikes Master Plan and Trail-Ways . That the project has been determined to be exempt under CEQA; that additional traffic analysis was prepared; and that the additional 20 units will not create any significant impacts. Commissioner Olhasso noted for the record that although she was not at the previous Planning Commission re()arding this item, she has reviewed the audio of record and is able to participate in discussion. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Ms. Kitzerow relayed that Condition Nos. 17,41,42 and 45 are new conditions. City Attorney Thorson stated that what is before the Planning Commission would be the Resolution which would approve the project along with all 45 conditions. Mr. Thorson also stated that because the Public Hearing is still open from the previous meeting, public comments should be confined to comments regarding conditions. Mr. A.G. Kating relayed that he has reviewed the Conditions and is in agreement with all of them plus the new added four Conditions; he also stated that he will be providing the 8-foot wide multi-use trail easement, provided that anytime in the future if the City were to build a path, that it would be paid for by the City; and that all costs associated with the easement will be paid for by the developer. Chairman Telesio noted a typo in COA No. 42; that east side should be south side. Mr. Robert Oder, Temecula resident noted that he is in favor of the proposed project and would desire that the Planning Commission approve the applicant's request. Mr. Paul Runkle expressed his excitement of the proposed project. R:\MinutesPC\121504 2 Mr. Chris Pedersen, Temecula resident, relayed that although he has no disagreement with the proposed project, he did express disappointment that this item has been brought forward again. City Attorney Thorson relayed that the project was approved four (4) years ago; that once it is approved that becomes the project; and that any changes to it would need to go through the Public Hearing process. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve the adopted resolution subject to the correction of COA No. 42 and that COA No. 45 reflects that the irrevocable offer of dedication will be outside of the existing utility easement. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner's Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. PC RESOLUTION 2004-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0260, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20 UNITS AT THE APPROVED TEMECULA RIDGE APARTMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99- 0317 - DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO RESULT IN THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 240-UNIT, TWO AND THREE-STORY APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH A POOL, CLUBHOUSE, WORKOUT BUILDING AND TOT LOT ON APPROXIMATELY 21 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944- 290-011 5 Planninq Application No. PA04-0472. a Development Plan, submitted by McArdle Associates Architects. to desiqn and construct a 20.416 square foot two-story office buildinq on a 1.21 acre site in the Liqht Industrial Ill) zone. located at the southwest corner of Winchester Road and Diaz Road Associate Planner Kitzerow presented a staff report (of record), noting the following: . That staff has reviewed the proposed Development Plan and has determined that the project is in conformance with the Development Code, Design Guidelines and all applicable City ordinances . That the project has been determined to be exempt from CEOA and as an infill development under five (5) acres and that staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the Development Plan . That staff is also adding a Condition of Approval regarding: Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit (see staff report). Commissioner Chiniaeff queried if staff has concerns with the project being pushed-up into the corner of Diaz and Winchester Road. R:\MinutesPC\121504 3 For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Ms. Kitzerow relayed that staff would prefer to have the building with the enhanced corner treatments and that the existing signage will remain, rather than have a portion of the driveway or parking along the frontage. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Ed McArdle, architect for the proposed project clarified that in regard to the building pushed up into the corner; that access was not allowed from the main road along Diaz Road; that the only access would be from Winchester at the rear of the property which would dictate the site plan; that the parking in the back will be screened; and that there will be no street parking along Winchester Road. For Mr. Mc Ardle, Commissioner Olhasso expressed excitement with the proposed architecture. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff's recommendation subject to the addition of a Condition regarding: Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permits, as recommended by staff (see staff report). Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESULTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-Q472, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 20,416 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.21 ACRES IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE," LOCATED AT 41900 WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 909-310-001-1 6 Planninq Application No. PA04-0512. a Development Plan. submitted by McArdle Associates Architects. for the development of 12 corporate office buildinqs. consistinq of one and two story buildinqs ranqinq in size from 3,725 square feet to 6,912 square feet desiqned in a campus like settinq: located on the northeast corner of Roick Drive and Via Industria Assistant Planner Damko presented a staff report (of record), noting the following: . That the proposed project as conditioned is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and Design Guidelines . That staff is requesting to delete Conditions 83-88 due to it being a duplication of 77- 82 . That staff recommends approval of the development plan as conditioned with the deleted Conditions 83-88. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. R:\MinutesPC\121504 4 Mr. Phil Oberhansley, representing the applicant noted that the project is a for-sale project and maintenance wid be handled by the property owner's association. Mr. Ed McArdle, applicant, relayed that the buildings will not be identical and will offer three different varieties of brick veneer along with stone and enhanced landscaping. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve staff's recommendation and delete conditions 83-88. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner's Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0512, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT 12 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS ON A 4.39 ACRE SITE IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) ZONE LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ROICK ROAD AND VIA INDUSTRIA. (ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 909-321-004, 005, AND 006) 7 Planninq Application No. PA04-0361. a Development Plan. submitted by Smith Consultinq Architects. to construct an 86.175 square foot. concrete tilt-up. Iiqht industrial warehouse buildinq on a 5.55 acre vacant site in the Liqht Industrial Ill) zone. located on the northeast side of Reminqton Avenue. west of Diaz Road Assistant Planner Damko presented a staff report (of record), noting the following: . That the proposed one-story building will be constructed of concrete tilt-up panels finished and painted with a smooth matte finish . That the building will be providing both parapet height variations and building articulations as required by the City's Design Guidelines . That staff has determined that the proposed project as conditioned is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code and Design Guidelines; and therefore, staff is recommending approval. At this time the public hearing was opened but due to no speakers it was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the proposed project subject to the Conditions as proposed by staff. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. R:\MinutesPC\ 121504 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE INITIAL STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0361, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT AN 86, 175 SQAURE FOOT LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON A VACANT 5.55 ACRE SITE IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (L1) ZONE LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST SIDE OF REMINGTON AVENUE WEST OF DIAZ ROAD. (ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-370-024). 8 Planninq Application No. PA No. PA04-0486. a Specific Plan Amendment, submitted by M-A Temeku Hills Development. LLC. to the Marqarita Villaqe Specific Plan to reduce the buildinq setback requirement from adioininq properties in Planninq Area 46 Principal Planner Hogan presented a staff report (of record), noted the following: . That the item before the Commission would be a minor amendment to the Temeku SP to facilitate the transfer of some of the recreational facilities from the master developer to the HOA . That all involved at this time would be a change in the setback standards for Planning Area 46 which would eliminate the setbacks around the clubhouse. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Barry Burnell, of T&B Planning, offered the following comments: . That the intent would be to split off the clubhouse building so that it would not be a burden to the Homeowners Association in terms of ownership and that functionally everything will run as it currently does . That this is an agreement between the HOA and McMillin and that they will have joint use of the facilities. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Resolution. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner's Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. R:\MinutesPC\ 121504 6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04- 0486 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.6) TO AMEND THE TEXT WITHIN THE MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN'S (SP NO. 199) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PLANNING AREA 46. 9 Planninq Application No. PA04-0351. a Tentative Tract Map. submitted by Lennar Communities. to sub-divide 53.28 acres into 247 lots (242 residential units). located alonq the east side of Ynez Road. north of Date Street Associate Planner Harris presented a staff report (of record), noting the following: . That since the writing of staff's report, there have been a couple new issues that have been risen that are not included in staff's report . That a new COA stating: In accordance with Figure 1110 of the Harveston SP a landscape interface buffer shall be established in the rear yards of all lots within the tract that abut the Murrieta City boundary; that CC&Rs shall identify the specific lots to be improved with the landscape buffer and shall stipulate that the tract HOA shall be responsible for insuring that the buffer is established and maintained; that the design of the landscape buffer shall conform to figure 1019 which will also be incorporated into the CC&Rs . That staff has received two letters of correspondence expressing many concerns of the proposed project . That Planning and Public Works staff are of the opinion that the tract conforms to all SP and subdivision ordinances requirements in terms of design and layout; that moreover, the project has been determined consistent with the Harveston EIR which was part of the original SP; therefore, staff is recommending approval of tract 32437 subject to the 80 conditions in Exhibit A and the one added Condition recommended by staff. Commissioner Chiniaeff is of the opinion that it may be difficult to implement a Condition that states that the HOA maintains the maintenance of the slopes. To address Commissioner Chiniaeff's concern regarding slope maintenance, Principal Planner Hogan noted that the intent would be to have the HOA oversee the slopes and inform property owners that it would be their responsibility to maintain the slopes; that the HOA would be responsible for being in compliance with the SP but that the maintenance of the slopes would be responsibility of the individual property owners. R:\MinutesPC\121504 7 For Principal Planner Hogan, Commissioner Chiniaeff is of the opinion that the obligation should be established by the developer to install the landscaping; that it be maintained by the individual property owner; and that the maintenance could be enforced through CC&Rs. Commissioner Olhasso echoed Commissioner's Chiniaeff's comment. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Kevin Lynch, representing Lennar Communities, highlighted the following: . That the slopes are to be maintained by the homeowners . That the applicant does not have any concerns with the developer installing the landscaping; and that the street connection at the corner of Murrieta was always determined to be a connection into the community. Commissioner Chiniaeff queried on the true intent of the Condition. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Harris stated that the true intent of the Condition would be to provide a buffer between the two; however, at the writing of the SP, there was no way to determine which way the slope was going to fall i.e. rise up in the back of the new homes or rise up in the back of the existing homes. Mr. Lynch noted that the Conditions states: that on-side up, up-side, and down slope conditions will be created by a 2:1 manufactured slope along the northern residential edge boundary; and that the slopes will be maintained by the individual homeowners and will be landscaped per City of Temecula standards. Commissioner Chiniaeff reiterated his opinion that the developer should be the one installing the proper landscaping to ensure that it be uniform. The following individuals expressed concern with traffic circulation through the area and requested a continuance so that other community members would be able to attend and voice their concerns: Mr. Chod Long Mr. Ronald Finch Mr. Mike Lopez Mr. Kevin Lynch and John Tanner, representing Lennar Communities, offered the following comments: . That a traffic analysis on the potential impact for the connection - street RR which will connect to north end road . That it is anticipated that approximately 28% of the population of the new tract will be traveling in the east bound direction and that the remaining 72% would be traveling in the west-bound direction over toward the Ynez Road access R:\MinutesPC\121504 8 . That during peak hours (am, pm peak), that approximately 50 to 60 additional cars would be generated down north end which is equivalent of one(1) per minute over these two peak hours . That the applicant is of the opinion that impacts (based on findings) would be minimal . That in the future when Ynez Road and Jackson Avenue are connected into Murrieta, this connection will function better At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. For the Commission, Mr. Harris stated that the map is in conformance with the approved Specific Plan. Director of Planning Ubnoske stated that Arroyo Park has always been envisioned to be a natural open space and spanning it with a bridge would detract from what the intent is and that if staff were to consider that option, staff would be inconsistent with the Specific Plan. Commissioner Chiniaeff queried if staff has entertained other options on now to get another access point into the tract. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that a street has always been envisioned to go through that area and that the tract is consistent with the Specific Plan. For the audience Chairman Telesio apologized for having to limit speakers, but noted that each individual speaker is only allowed three (3) minutes to speak on items listed on the agenda. Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that he is of the opinion that the Planning Commission is in a position that would have to allow the proposed project noting that the original intent was to have a landscape buffer, but queries on how wide it would be. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that she is not prepared to given an exact number of footage of what the landscaped buffer would be; but understanding what the Commission's concerns are, staff will work with the developer to ensure that there is an enough useable backyard and that here is sufficient mitigation to screen the properties. Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested that a Condition be added that requires the landscape on lots adjacent to the tract boundary on the north to the east; that the slopes be landscaped and installed with an irrigation system tied to the house; and that the Planning Director determine how wide the landscape buffer would be where it is flat. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Ms. Ubnoske responded that she would happy to add such a Condition. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the proposed project, subject to a buffering being installed. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner's Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. R:\MinutesPC\ 121504 9 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0351, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32437 SUBDIVIDING PLANNING AREA 10 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN INTO 242 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 4 OPEN SPACE LOTS AND ONE PARK LOT FOR LENNAR COMMUNITIES ON 53.3 VACANT ACRES GENERALLY LOCATD EAST OF YNEZ ROAD AND NORTH OF DATE STREET KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 916-040-099 & 910-110-013. At 7:54, the Planning Commission took a 10 minute break. At 8:03, the Planning Commission reconvened. 10 Planninq Application No. PA04-0550. a Maior Modification to a Development Plan, submitted by Brian Price. Breckenridqe Group. to allow exterior elevation chanqes and the conversion of a Coco's Restaurant to a Ruby's Diner. located at 26495 Ynez Road. .west of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive in the Palm Plaza Shoppinq Center Associate Planner Peters presented a staff report (of record), noting the following: . That staff has worked with the applicant, however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction of staff: o That the proposed tower element and color changes do not meet the Development Code or City-wide Design Guidelines o That in other Cities, the Ruby's Corporation has shown a willingness to modify their buildings to fit the local area, rather than relay on franchise architecture designs o Allowing major changes to a single building within an approved center would set a bad precedent for this center, and other as well o That language in the City's Code state: That a consistent design theme must be used throughout the project; that the Palm Plaza Shopping is an integrated shopping center and franchise architecture is discouraged, especially to promote a single structure, and that exterior design colors and materials should be consistent amount all buildings in a complex and overly bright colors should be avoided . That overall, the exterior changes are not consistent with the City's Development Code or Design Guidelines; therefore, staff recommends denial of this application or continue for redesign to incorporate elements as deemed acceptable to the Planning Commission. R:\MinutesPC\121504 10 For the Commission, Mr. Peters noted that the applicant submitted their application in October or 2004. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Brian Price, representing the applicant, offered the following comments: . That Ruby's Diner is a 1940s themed restaurant which is known for its burgers, fries and fountain drinks . That the applicant has attempted to work with staff but that when staff discovered that the original Design Guidelines were in existence, staff could no longer approve the white building, red, accents or the tower plaza above the entry door . That it i8 the applicant's position that the Design Guidelines are 10 years behind the direction that the City has taken with new developments; and that this has put the project at a competitive disadvantage with restaurants directly across the street and elsewhere around the town . That the applicant would request that the Planning Commission support change with major modification highlighting the following: o That the applicant noted their willingness to remove the tower if the other design elements could be considered; that the owner of the Palm Plaza, Kimco, have approved the proposed elevations and also stated that they do not have any plans to redesign the center o That without the brand identity of the exterior of the building, the investment to strip and refurnish the interior of the building would not be a viable alternative. Mr. Ralph Kosimides, representing Ruby's Diner noted the following: . That Ruby's Diner has been around for 15 to 20 years . That currently there are 37 Ruby's Diner restaurants, mainly in Southern California but also in a few other states . That the Ruby's brand is an American, modern classic tradition of quality, wholesome, warm, honest, real and based on substance not flash . That it is important that Ruby's Diner remain with its theme if it is going to compete with the restaurants at the mall. Mr. John Grantes, Franchise Principal for the existing Coco's and proposed Ruby's Diner, made the following comments: . That it is very important to be able to keep the Ruby's them to be able to compete effectively with all the competition across the street and the rest of the City. R:\MinutesPC\121504 11 . That the applicant is of the opinion that the Ruby's brand is a logical fit for the community noting and that it will be a family oriented restaurant. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Peters relayed that the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines apply to all commercial zones. Ms. Ubnoske relayed that the Palm Plaza is a cohesive center and that staff's concerns would be to have the proposed building that would be very different from every other building along the street and in the center would set a bad precedent. Ms. Ubnoske also noted that she is of the opinion that staff and the applicant can work to keep as much as the Ruby's Diner through some signage, soften the red colors, and doing some different detail. The Commission expressed their excitement for having a Ruby's Dine come to town but queried if the applicant would be willing to work with staff to ensure that the proposed project meets the City's Design Guidelines. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Ralph Kosimides stated that the applicant would be willing to work with staff to meet the Design Guidelines. Ms. Ubnoske relayed that the project could be brought back to the Planning Commission at the January or February meeting. Commissioner Chiniaeff volunteered to with staff and the applicant on the redesign of the project. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue the proposed project to January 13, 2005. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner's Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. 11 Planninq Application Nos. PA04-0369. PA04-0370. PA04-371 and PA04-0590. submitted by Ashby USA. LLC. a General Plan Amendment is a request to amend the land use desiqnation from Open Space (OS) to Low-Medium, Residential (LM): Specific Plan Amendment to request the Fuel Modification Zone. Development Standards. Desion Guidelines and various descriptions of the individual Planninq Areas: Amendment to a Development Aqreement to include lanquaqe to modifv the timinq of improvements and construction of a new fire station: and a Tentative Tract Map #32004 request to subdivide approximately 2.0 acres into 6 additional lots. located in PA1A of the Roripauqh Ranch Specific Plan. in the northeast area of the City of Temecula, Murrieta Hot Sprinqs Road at Butterfield Staqe Road Associate Planner Long presented a staff report (of record), noting the following: R:\MinutesPC\ 121504 12 . That the proposed General Plan Amendment is a request to change the Land Use Designation for Planning Area 7B from Open Space (OS) to low-medium density residential . That the current Specific Plan includes two detention basins within the Pan-handle designated as OS . That the adjacent landowner to the west has designed a storm drain system capable of directing the flow from the Roripaugh Ranch project site . That as a result, the two-acre detention basin in Planning Area 7B is no longer necessary; and that the General Plan Amendment, if approved, would allow six (6) additional lots in Planning Area 1 A . That the primary reason for the SP Amendment would be to modify the fuei medication boundary . That the proposed SP Amendment also includes a request to modify the location and description of the Fuel Modification Zone adjacent planning area; that the Fuel Modification Zone was initially located within the City's owned OS habitat area: that subsequent to the adoption of the SP, state and federal resource agencies determined that the fuel modification zone could not be located within the OS habitat area: and that the Fuel Modification Zone is proposed entirely within the residential Planning Areas . That in addition, the applicant has requested language that provides flexibility in the type of potential product type permitted in Planning Areas 12, 14, and 15; that these Planning Areas will maintain the zoning designation of M2; however the amendment will allow standard and/or clustered products as opposed to only clustered products, as the current SP requires . That clustered type products will be required in Planning Area 22 and 31 . That an amendment to the Design Guidelines will read: required additionai style elements shall appear as integral parts of the home rather than tack-on features . That inspirational photos have be been included in the SP Amendment . That the majority of the amendments were clean-up items such as fencing and trail plans . That the maximum lots within a SP will not exceed 2,015 per the EIR adopted by the City Council . That staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and notice of determination, and staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the project with the COA. For the Commission, City Attorney Thorson relayed that Mello Roos is scheduled to be funded in the early part of February of 2005. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. R:\MlnutesPC\121504 13 Mr. Mathew Fagan and Kevin Everett, representing Ashby, relayed that the applicant in agreement with the Conditions of the Approval and is seeking the support of the Planning Commission to move this project forward with the proposed changes. Ms. Ubnoske clarified that the Planning Commission would only be approving staff's recommendations as stated in staffs report. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Tentative Tract Map, the Development Agreement Modifications as proposed and the Design Guidelines. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner's Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (PA04-0370) TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 7B IN THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO LOW MEDIUM, RESIDENTIAL (LM)", A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (PA04-0371) TO CHANGE PLANNING AREA 7B FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO LOW MEDIUM, RESIDENTIAL (LM), PLANNING AREA 10 FROM LOW DENSITY, RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-ESTATE, RESIDENTIAL (LE), AND MAKE OTHER CHANGES TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN", AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING REVISED RESIDENTIAL ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (PA04-0371) FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN", "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (PA04- 0590) FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN" AND "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING-TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32004 (PA04-0369), GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS AND POURROY ROAD." R:\MinutesPC\ 121504 14 ~, 't COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS For Commissioner Olhasso, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that the General Plan Update is tentatively scheduled to come to the Planning Commission on February 2, 2005. Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that he would expect to receive Planning Commissioner's packet in a timely manner. Chairman Telesio thanked staff for all their hard work and wished everyone a Happy Holiday Season. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT None at this time. ADJOURNMENT At 9:10 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetinq to be held on Wednesday. January 5. 2005 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. JOhO;{- ~.- Chairman '7J~-- ~)L Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R:\MinutesPC\121504 15