HomeMy WebLinkAbout061604 PC Minutes
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 16, 2004
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00
P.M., on Wednesday, June 16, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Telesio thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Chiniaeff led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and
Chairman Telesio.
Absent:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Aaenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 ApprO\1e the Agenda of June 16, 2004.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of April 21, 2004.
3 Director's Hearina Case Uodate recommendation:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for May 2004.
. R:\MinutesPCI061604
1
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the Consent Calendar.
Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
aDDroval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
New Items
4 Plannina Application No. PA03-0717 an Administrative Development Plan. submitted
bv Matt Greenbera. Wes/Mar. to construct a 550 sauare foot fenced outdoor
smokinalseatina area in association with an existina lounae located at 27725
Jefferson Avenue. Suite 101 and 102. north of Montezuma
Senior Planner Papp presented a staff report (of record), relaying the following:
. That the Beacon Lounge has applied for an Administrative Development Plan
(ADP) to construct a 550 square foot outdoor seating/smoking area in
conjunction with the existing lounge;
. That the area is being proposed to be fenced with an eight-foot high wall around
an existing landscaped area;
. That the applicant expressed concern with the Planning Department's Conditions
of Approval regarding landscaping and that the applicant was informed that more
landscaping would be required as replacement for the landscaping to be
removed;
. That staff suggested that the applicant plant vines or shrubs along the outside
base of the fence, to incorporate live plantings in clay pots near the entrance to
the lounge, and to plant a cluster of small trees in the southwest corner of the
outdoor area; .
. . That the applicant's revised plan indicated one sago palm in a corner and a total
of three clay pots;
. That staff made an administrative decision to have this item come before the
Planning Commission for review and approval;
. That staff is in favor of the application but that staff is of the opinion that the
landscaping be upgraded and staff has attached three Conditions of Approval to
address the concern of landscaping.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Patrick Meredith, the applicant, relayed the following:
R:IMinulesPCI061604
2
. That he is of the opinion that the landscaping requirements have been met;
. That the applicant is open to any type of tree other than sago palm.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Guerriero noted that he is in favor of the patio concept but concurs with
staff's recommendation in regard to landscaping.
Commissioner Mathewson concurs with staff's recommendation of conditioning the
fence inward approximately 18 inches from the drive aisle to accommodate landscaping
and noted that he is not in favor of the proposed sago palm.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation and that
staff work with the applicant in regard to the tree type. Commissioner Mathewson
seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Chiniaeff who voted No.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-031
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA03-0717, AN ADMINISTRATIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 550 SQUARE
FOOT FENCED OUTDOOR SMOKING/SEATING AREA IN
ASSOCIATION WITH AN EXISTING LOUNGE LOCATED
AT 27725 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SUITE 101 AND 102,
. NORTH OF VIA, ALSO KNOWS AS ASSESSORS
PARCEL NUMBER 921-400-031
5 Plannino Application No. PA04-0215 a Comprehensive Sion Prooram. submitted bv
Bruce Heinsel. Motivational Systems. for the "villaoe" commercial portion of the
Temecula Creek Villaoe Proiect located on the south side of Hiohway 79S between
Jedediah Smith Road and Avenida De Missiones
Senior Planner Papp presented a staff report (of record), noting the following:
. That on December 12, 2001, the Planning Commission approved a Development
Plan to allow for the construction of 400 apartment units and 121,000 square feet
of commercial office retail space on approximately 32 acres;
. That at the time of approval, a sign program was not required by the
Development Code for this type of building; therefore, the Planning Commission
did not have the opportunity to review signage for the project;
R:\MinutesPC\061604
3
. . That therefore, staff brought the sign program to the Planning Commission for
review and approval and that the sign program for Temecula Creek Village
proposes 10 different types of signs;
. That staff reviewed proposed sign program and is of the opinion that most of the
signs conform to the design standards found in the Development Code.
Sian oroposals:
. Signs Band C: (see staff report); that staff is of the opinion that there is a need to
enhance these signs by adding architectural elements to the top and sides of
each sign, per the Development Code;
. Sian E: (see staff report); that the Development Code is silent on suspended
cabinet signs mounted with the issue of internal illumination; that as a condition
of approval, staff recommends the insertion of an opaque backing plate behind
the sign face, stamped or cut in such a way, to illuminate only the text and
graphic elements of the sign face;
. Sian F: (see staff report); that staff has concerns with the issue of internal
illumination and recommends Condition of Approval No. 16 to address this issue.
CONCLUSION:
Staff has determined that the proposed sign program, subject to the proposed
Conditions of Approval, for the Temecula Creek Village Development, comply with the
purpose and intent of the sign standards of the Development Code; and that staff is of
the opinion that the sign program will enhance the development, and staff is
recommending approval.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Papp further clarified sign dimensions and fonts.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Bruce Heinzel, of Motivational Systems Inc., representing A.W. properties relayed
the following:
. That the primary objection in the signage design would be to create an image
and a mood consistent with Temecula's unique atmosphere and to create a
continuous theme within the mixed-use development including TemeciJla Creek
Village retail and the gated residential area by utilizing a slight variation of the
same logo;
R:\MinutesPC\061604
4
. That the timeless, up-scale craftsman-style logo mark was rendered with a color-
palette change to differentiate the two developments, while still tying them
together as a community; and that the residential logo will appear in stained
glass while the retail logo will be in dark rust and bronze;
. That natural materials and earthy colors in the signs will be enhanced by the
surrounding terrain and will illustrate the builder's attention to detail and concern
for the City's environment;
. That the signs being proposed will create a sense of arrival and permanence in
the community with striking details and illumination, while still functioning as
visible, legible directional signage for both pedestrian and vehicular way finding.
The following describes the types of signs being proposed:
Main entry identification monument
. Sian Type A: would be the main entry identification monument;
. Sian Type B: would be a man entry major retail tenant monument;
. Sian Type C: would be a secondary major office tenant monument;
. Sian Type D: would be freestanding multi-tenant directory;
Secondary Identity Sianaae
. Sian Type E: retail tenant identification arcade sign; that staff expressed concern
with illumination type;
. Sian Type F: upper floor office tenant identification signage;
. Sian Type G: major office tenant identification;
Way findina
. Sian Tvee H: secondary office tenant directory;
. Sian Type I: retail tenant signage;
. Sian Type J: building address plaque.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed excitement with the overall project.
Commissioner Guerriero echoed Commissioner Chiniaeff's comments.
Commissioner Olhasso noted her appreciation for the improved monument sign and
complemented the logo, but did express concern with the logos on the second story.
R:\MinutesPC\061604
5
Assistant City Attorney Curley clarified corporate logs noting that the Commission could
control the size of logos but not the actual logo itself.
Commissioner Olhasso suggested reducing the size of the signs.
Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that she understands the concerns of the
Commission in regard to the size of the signs and relayed that if it is the will of the
Commission, staff could work with the applicant in reducing the size.
For the Commission, Senior Planner Papp relayed that he would be happy to work with
the applicant to address the concerns of the sign size.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson move staff's recommendation; that staff work with
the applicant in regard to architectural treatments for Sian Types B&C to include chisel
cut caps to all freestanding monument signs and above tenant identification panels; that
opaque backing to all store front identification signs be added (see staff report); that the
text regarding individual signs be clarified with staff and the applicant; and that the
applicant work with staff to achieve an appropriate reduction for Sian Type G.
Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-032
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA04-0215, TO ADOPT A
COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE "VILLAGE
COMMERCIAL" AREA OF TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE
GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BETWEEN JEDEDIAH SMITH
ROAD AND AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, ALSO KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL 961-010-025 THROUGH -031, -033
THROUGH -035, AND -037
6 Plannina Application No. PA04-0297 a City initiated Development Code Amendment
to establish reauirements for private heliports and to make other minor chanaes
Associate Planner Harris presented a staff report (of record), noting the following:
. That in October 2003, under a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), a rooftop heliport
was approved at 42580 Rio Nedo at the northwest corner of Temecula in an
industrial area and will be 400 square feet in size;
. That the Planning Director's decision was appealed by Councilman Stone;
advising that his concerns were that there was no current criteria that existed
within the Development Code that would apply to heliports; and that due to this,
Mr. Stone was of the opinion that further analysis by the City would be warranted;
R:\MinutesPCI061604
6
. That based on Councilman Stone's appeal, staff surveyed 16 heliport
jurisdictions stating that out of 16 jurisdictions, half did not have any standard
regulations for heliports; and that the scope and range of the heliports that did
have regulations, varied greatly;
. That staff recommends that private heliports also be allowed in the Professional
Office (PO) zoning districts as a conditional use to better serve business owners
and executives;
. That moreover, staff is requesting that private hospital heliports also be allowed
as a conditional use in the Community Commercial (CC), Highway Tourist
Commercial (HTC), and Service Commercial (SC) zones so as to better
accommodate a potential hospital facility in these areas of the City;
. That in addition, staff has drafted siting and design criteria which addresses the
following:
o Prohibiting the siting of private heliport facilities within 1,000 .feet of
existing or designated schools, public parks, and existing and future
assembly facilities having 500 persons or more seating capacity;
o Prohibiting the siting of the heliport's touchdown liftoff area within required
yards nor within ten (10) of the property line;
o That as part of the City's processing of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP),
these facilities proposals will be transmitted to both the State Aeronautics
Division, the Airport Land Use Commission, Riverside County, and the
FAA as well;
o That the amendment will also be requiring a potential wall around ground
heliports to reduce horizontal wind velocities;
. That since the writing of staff's report the State Aeronautics Division
recommended another change to the proposed ordinance that reads: that ground
heliports may be required to be surrounded by a fence or wall at least four feet
high and constructed in such a manner as to deflect the horizontal wind velocities
caused by the rotation of the rotor blades, providing all FAR Part 77 imaginary
surfaces and the surface area remain obstruction fee; and that . staff is
recommending that additional language be modified;
. That touchdown liftoff area shall be surfaced with material that will be free of
dust, loose organic or inorganic material, and particles that may be blown about
by the helicopter;
R:\MinutesPC\061604
7
. That lighting used for nighttime operations shall be directed away from adjacent
residences;
. That in regard to rooftop heliports no roof openings, windows, or skylights, shall
be permitted within twenty-five (25) feet of touchdown landing area;
. That staff is proposing that flights operate between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on
weekdays only (except for medical emergency flights); however, there would be
the ability to have intermittent use flights on Saturdays and Sundays subject to
an acquisition of a temporary use permit;
. That in regard to operational hours, the applicant is requesting that the
operational hours (prohibiting the weekend use) be applied to heliports over 500
feet of a residential zone;
. That biennial monitoring report will come before the Planning Commission every
couple of years; that the biennial report shall include data on the types of
helicopters using the facility, hours of operation, performance standards, number
of monthly flights, and any other necessary data;
. That staff determined that the provisions are exempt from CEQA;
. That staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend that the City.
Council adopt the proposed Development Code amendment for private heliports.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that a wall or fence surrounding a ground heliport would
cause dust to be blown around and suggested that this requirement be deleted; that
hospital heliports be limited to those that serve ER/trauma centers; that staff consider
operating hours on an case by case study; and that in regard to the annual report, staff
may want to consider asking for a review of the CUP only if there have been complaints
due to the heliport.
Commissioner Guerriero relayed that he concurs with staff in regard to hours of
operation; that someone other than the applicant should be in charge of the periodic
review other than the applicant and that Commissioner Guerriero concurs with
Commissioner Chi,niaeff's comment in that hospital heliports should be only for
ER/trauma.
R:\MinutesPC\061604
8
Fire Marshal McBride noted the following:
. That there is a loop hole of Article 24 of the California Fire Code which states
that: there ,must be two conforming exits, stairway and a legitimate door exiting
from a helicopter landing area if its on a building; that the loop hole states that if
it is smaller than a certain dimension, one conforming exit and that the second
could be a quick escape device (ladder); the loop hole portion is that if you have
the helicopter landing on the roof, the roof of any commercial building would far
exceed the dimensions and there would need to be two conforming exits; that if
a 12 inch platform is built on top of a roof, the exiting requirement would only be
from the platform to the roof resulting in one exit leaving the roof to get down;
. That the department has great difficulty with the idea of only having one exit from
a rooftop helicopter;
. That often times general acute care hospitals take in people that turn unstable
and need to be flown to more advanced care;
Assistant City Attorney Curley clarified zoning ordinances for the Planning Commission.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Daniel Roth of Robinson Helicopters noted that the California Fire Code and the
California Building Code that when you have a small helicopter landing area the number
of people in the helicopter is small, it is not necessary to have two exits from it.
Mr. McBride clarified that if the Planning Commission adopts an amendment to the
Development Code that Mr. McBride would suggest to include a requirement for two
conforming stairway exits from any rooftop heliport.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to recommend that the City Council adopt
the proposed ordinance subject to the following: that hospital heliports be limited to
those that serve as ER/trauma, that the requirement of a wall or fence be installed
around helipads be deleted; that the periodic review be implemented only if there have
been complaints to a specific site; that staff consider the hours of operation on a case
by case study. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
R:IMinutesPCI061604
9
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-033
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIN OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH
REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVATE HELIPORTS IN
VARIOUS ZONES ANDMAKE OTHER MINOR CHANGES"
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0297
7 Plannina Application No. PA02-0478 an Appeal. submitted bv Brad Adams.
Sunstone Svstems International. Inc.. of the Plannina Director's decision to approve
a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the construction. establishment
and operation of a private heliport on an existina industrial buildina located at 42580
Rio Nedo
Associate Planner Harris presented a staff report (of record), noting the following:
. That staff has reviewed the proposed heliport project against the draft
supplemental standards and has determined that the project would fully conform
to these provisions;
. That should the Commission support the proposed Development Code
Amendment, staff recommends that the appeal be denied subject to an added
project condition stating that:
o Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 2 approval is contingent on City Council
adoption of a Development Code Amendment and that the project conforms
to the adopted standards and regulations.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Fire Marshal McBride noted the following:
. That there will be a fire extinguisher on the roof adjacent to the landing pad;
. That there will be one conforming exit from the pad and ,the second could be a
ladder.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Roth repmsenting the applicant, noted that there would be an existing roof hatch
with a stair on the building; and that the plan is to put a full set of stairs in going down to
the first floor; and is of the opinion that the applicant would not object to putting a ladder
that goes over the parapet and down the side of the building to the back of the yard; and
. that there will be marked signage to call out the exit on the set of stairs.
Ms. Nancy Baron of Temecula noted concern with flight plans.
R:\MinutesPC\061604
10
For Ms. Baron, Chairman Telesio relayed that anything that is approved would be
subject to FAA regulations.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to denv the appeal and include a condition in
the CUP that requires that the applicant to include an emergency ladder that goes over
the parapet and down the side. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice
vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-034
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF
THEPLANNING DIRECTOR'S DECISION TO APPROVE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0478 A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A PRIVATE
ROOFTOP HELIPORT ON AN EXISTING INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING LOCATED AT 42580 RIO VEDO KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. APN 909-290-029
8 Plannina Application No. PA03-0535 a Conditional Use Permit and Development.
Plan. submitted bv Lon Bike. Architectural Team 3. to construct an 18.808 sauare
foot. three-story office/retail buildina within the Old Town Specific Plan Area. located
on the south side of Fifth Street. approximatelv 120 west of Front Street. Don Hazen.
Principal Planner
Principal Planner Hazen presented a staff report (of record), noting the following:
. That the proposed project is a request for a three-story mixed use office/retail
building.
. That the building design conforms to the Old Town Specific Plan, Old Town
Western architectural style guidelines;
. That feature styling such as vertical cedar siding, corrugated metal roofs, wood
trimmed windows, wood picket railings, wood column posts, and decorative
building light fixtures will be incorporated;
. That the applicant has also incorporated staff's request to add windows and
storefronts along the rear facing the creek and to add a storefront entrance and
shed roof dormers over the lower windows along the alley to help maintain the
pedestrian scale of the alley;
R:IMinutesPCI061604
11
. That the proposed project as conditioned is consistent with the current and
proposed amended Old Town Specific Plan; that three-story buildings in the
Tourist Retail Core (TRC) are recommended in the proposed amended Specific
Plan (SP), and the project is contingent upon City Council approval of the SP
amendment or this particular request (whichever occurs first); and that the Old
Town Local Review Board reviewed the application and unanimously
recommended Planning Commission Approval.
For Commissioner Olhasso, Deputy Director Parks relayed that the walking path for the
Murrieta Creek trail will be completed in 2 to 3 years -and that the Army Corp. of
Engineer will be planning on beginning design work of the facility in October 2004.
Commissioner Olhasso expressed excitement with the new investment in Old Town.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Hogan relayed that the Specific Plan does not require
on-site parking; that the applicant will be providing the absolute minimum on-site
parking for their tenant needs; that in addition, the applicant will be construction two
parallel parking spaces in the 5lh street right-of-way; and that the City is currently
exploring locations to establish interim parking facilities as well.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Lon Bike, representing Architectural Team 3, relayed that the applicant concurs with
the Conditions of Approval.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approved staff's recommendation.
Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
aDDroval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-035
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA03-0535, A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT
AN 18,808 SQUARE FOOT 3-STORY OFFICE/RETAIL
BUILDING, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FIFTH
STREET, APPROXIMATELY 120 FEET WEST OF FRONT
STREET; KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 922-
035-033,017, AND 019
At this time, the Planning Commission took a five minute break.
R:IMinulesPCI061604
12
9 Plannina Application No. PA03-0158 a City initiated proposal to make amendments
to the Old Town Specific Plan. includina updatina information on the urban
infrastructure plans. delete duplicate land uses from the permitted use matrix. add
supplemental desian standards. modify the Land Use Map. update the Local Review
Board's responsibilities. and delete the oriainal implementation proaram
Principal Planner Hogan presented a comprehensive amendment and update to the Old
Town Specific Plan. (OTSP); relaying that staff has been working with Development.
Processing Coordinator Noland and the Old Town Local Review Board for the past year
on the revision of the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP), the following are some of the
changes to the Land Use Map:
. That the Union 76 Service Station at the southeast corner of Rancho California
Road and Old Town Front Street into the Highway Tourist Planning Area in the
Specific Plan was added;
. That moving the boundary, adjustment between the Highway Tourist Commercial
and Community Commercial Planning Area to shift two parcels from the highway
Tourist to Community Commercial area; and that these two lots are oriented
toward the Core of Old Town;
. That the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) will be expanding northward to include the
shopping center immediately north; .
. That the Community Commercial Tourist Support District will be deleted at thJ
southern end of Old Town;
. That the Old Town Local Review Board recommended merging the Tourist
Servicing Residential (TSR) Planning District into the Tourist Retail Core (TRC)
Planning District; so staff recommends residences east of Mercedes Street be
designated or permitted uses which will allow residences to stay and expand,
and-in an event of a fire, will allow residences to replace a residence;
. That the proposed Specific Plan amendment will locate all the historic
preservation and Old Town Local Review Board provision into a single chapter of
the plan;
. That the permitted use matrix has been updated;
. That adjustments have been made to the mixed use provisions;
. That staff formalized the elimination of a parking standard in the Specific Plan;
. That staff is recommending that all the buildings in the Tourist Retail Core be
allowed to build up to three-stories;
R:\MinutesPC\061604
13
. That additional design standards were added such as Public Art, Outdoor Dining
and Sidewalk Furniture and Umbrellas, Pocket Parks, and Advertising and sign
Design Guidelines;
. That Shift Historic structure "0" one lot to the northeast; that this structure was
shifted onsite as part of a larger housing project;
/
. That building "B" has been added to the historic preservation list;
. That building "M" (Delgado House); that there have been issues raised by the
home owners in regards to the year of the Delgado House; and that staff will be
sending a building inspector out to determine whether it is 1920s or 1940s.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Hogan noted that a new parking structure is currently
being explored.
For Commissioner Olhasso, Mr. Hogan relayed that the Specific Plan (SP) has specific
standards to allow both office and residential over retail or in some cases it could also
be allowed behind it; that the original specific plan envisioned above but that the current
plan would envision behind as well.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Hogan relayed that there have been discussions
about establishing a S'd parking lot as an interim parking lot, prior to constructing a
parking structure near Mercedes Street and Main Street.
. Director of Planning Ubnoske further clarified that with the Theater opening in the
summer of 2005, staff would anticipate that there would be an increased demand for
parking; and that currently staff is seeking areas for surface parking.
Commissioner Olhasso suggested that a parking study be performed in Old Town.
Commissioner Guerriero gave thanks to the Old Town Local Review Board and staff for
an outstanding job with the revised Specific Plan.
At this time, the Pubic Hearing was opened.
Mr. Otto Baron, Temecula resident noted the following concerns:
. That Director of Redevelopment Meyer had six (6) buildings in Old Town
demolished;
. Queried on why Mercedes Stress is considered part of the Tourist Retail Core;
noting that he has had a tourist business at 4th and Mercedes and he would
desire to see tourist-type businesses near his store but that the City has been
discouraging businesses from expanding.
R:\MinutesPC\061604
14
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Chiniaeff gave kudos to the Old Town Local Review Board and staff for a
great job with the Specific Plan.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to recommend that the City Council approve
the Old Town Specific Plan and addendum to the plan. Commissioner Guerriero
seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval..
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THECITV OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THT THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVE
A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE OF THE OLD TOWN
SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 03-0518)
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT
Commissioner Guerriero commented on the newspapers racks in front of the post office
noting that they are unsightly and requested that Assistant City Attorney Curley explore
this issue.
Commissioner Mathewson relayed that he has driven through Harveston Community
and expressed excitement with the new community.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that she is of the
opinion that the median on Rancho California Road will be landscaped.
Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that he would prefer to have a real location map with
staff's report versus what is currently being used.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Ms. Ubnoske noted that the Black Angus is having problems with the wiring in their
water fountain; that in regard to banner signs on the rear side of Bel Villagio, the dental
sign is a valid permit until through June 23, 2004, the Help-U-Sell and Music Time are
both illegal banners, balloons at the EXXON Mobile when checked there were no
balloons, a notice violation was issued to the Shell Station in regard to painting, deletion
of handicap parking stalls, and graffiti on the gas pumps.
R:\MinutesPC\061604
15
Ms. Ubnoske also relayed that at the next meeting she will be bringing forward a report
in regard to Code Enforcement; and that the two new planners have started working;
and that the Meadow Village redesign plan will be coming forward soon.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:40 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reaular
meetina to be held on Wednesday. Julv 7. 2004 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
~ ".) l
John elesio
Chairman
-
I/~Ih-{' ~~
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
R:\MinutesPC\061604
16