Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout020106 PC Minutes " MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 1, 2006 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:30 p.m., on Wednesday, February 1, 2006, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Mathewson thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Chiniaeff led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio, and Chairman Mathewson. Absent: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Mr. Robert McHale, Temecula, asked if a controlled intersection will be installed at the corner of Calle Chapos and Walcott Lane. In response to Mr. McHale's question, Chairman Mathewson advised that he contact the Public Works Department for more information. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of January 5, 2006. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2 Elect new Chair and Vice Chair MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to appoint Commissioner Guerriero as Chairman for 2006. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:\MinulesPCI020106 MOTION: Commissioner Harter moved to appoint Commissioner Telesio as Vice-Chairman for 2006. This motion died for a lack of a second. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to appoint Commissioner Chiniaeff as Vice- Chairman for 2006. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDroval. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Continued from January 18,2006 3 Plannina ADolication No. Plannina Aoolication Nos. PA05-0155 a Pedestrian Plan and Sian Proaram. submitted bv Allen Robinson. on a 0.55 acre site for Butterfield Sauare. located at the southeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Third Street Associate Planner Fisk provided a brief staff report (of record). At this time, the public hearing was opened and due to no speakers, it was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDroval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05-0155, A PEDESTRIAN PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FOR BUTTERFIELD SQUARE, A 0.55 ACRE SITE GENERALLY' LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND THIRD STREET, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 922-043-005, 922-043-006, AND 922-043-007 New Items 4 Plannina Aoolication No. PA05-0295. a Maior Modification. submitted bv Michael Schafer to chanae materials and add stucco to an aooroved buildina. located at 41273 Maraarita Road on the corner of Maraarita Road and Overland Drive. Associate Planner McCoy provided the Planning Commission with a staff report (of record). At this time, the public hearing was opened. In response to Commissioner Guerriero's query, Mr. Michael Schafer, applicant, stated that tenants have expressed a need for electrical connections throughout the building; that the original design with windows down to the floor would not allow for that to happen; and that in order to accommodate the tenants, a base would need to be added to the building, advising that the proposed base would match the Overland Corporate Center which would also be owned by the applicant. R:IMinutesPCI020106 2 Commissioner Telesio questioned the intent of the modification, noting that per the staff report, the only modifications would be elimination of the base of the building and removal of painted reveal lines along the walls and base of the windows, not the elimination of the columns. Mr. Schafer advised that the reason for the elimination of reveals would be due to a previous experience of water leakage, noting that he would be of the opinion that elimination of the reveals would eliminate a concern for water leakage which could be caused by the banding. For Chairman Mathewson, Mr. Schafer stated that eliminating the reveal lines along the walls would enhance the building by providing a cleaner appearance. Via overheads, Mr. Schafer provided before and after pictures of the proposed project and clarified north, south, west, and east elevations. At this time, the public hearing was closed. COMMISSION DISCUSSION Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that he would recognize the need to raise the walls for electricity in the building and would be in concurrence with the applicant's request; but that he would not be in favor of eliminating the reveals or the change to the front elevation by taking the setback of the windows, advising that this would change the texture of the building. Echoing Commissioner Chiniaeff's comments, Commissioner Guerriero noted that the requested redesign changes to the project would not enhance the proposed project and noted that he would not be in agreement with the requested changes. Understanding the need to raise the wall to allow for electricity in the building, Commissioner Telesio stated that he was in favor of the original proposed design of the project and would not be in favor of the newly redesigned proposed project. Commissioner Telesio suggested that Item No. 4 be continued to allow the applicant time to work with staff with regard to the number of reveals lines to be eliminated, advising that this could be accomplished at staff level if that were the desire of the Planning Commission. Chairman Mathewson relayed that it would be his opinion that architectural elements have been lost with the applicant's request for redesign and, therefore, would concur that the item be continued. In response to Commissioner Telesio's and Chairman Mathewson's request of a continuance to allow time for the applicant and staff to work on the proposed project, Mr. Schafer stated that he would be in agreement of a continuance and will work with staff with regard to reveals lines, columns, and shadow lines. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to continue Item No. 4 to the March 1, 2006, Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant the opportunity to work with staff. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:IMinutesPCI020106 3 5 Plannina Application Nos. PA05-0290 and PA05-0306. a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan. submitted bv Don Manderscheild. to convert 32 apartment units to condominiums. located at 42140 Lvndie Lane Associate Planner Kitzerow presented a staff report (of written record). In response to Commissioner Telesio's query, Associate Planner Kitzerow stated that there would be no additional upgrades; that the exterior of the buildings and carpets have been painted; and that all other improvements include repairs to the interior of the units. Associate Planner Kitzerow noted that if it were the desire of the Planning Commission, a Condition of Approval could be imposed that would require that all interior units be painted. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Don Manderscheid, applicant, noted the following: . That once an apartment is vacated, it would be completely repainted . That any current resident would be given a $10,000 discount to accept the apartment as presented . That most of the carpeting in the units have been replaced in the last few years and that the exterior of all the buildings has been painted . That the units would not be in disrepair . That there will be a Homeowners Association that will be responsible for providing hot water to all units. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05-0306 A ONE-LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM NO. 34062) FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES TO CONVERT 32 APARTMENT UNITS TO CONDOMINIUMS LOCATED AT 42140 L YNDIE LANE R:IMinutesPCI020106 4 -,,^ 6 Plannina Application Nos. PA06-0009. PA05-0341. PA05-0404. a General Plan Amendment. Specific Plan Amendment. and Development Aareement Amendment. submitted bv Ashbv USA LLC. to amend the General Plan land use map. chanae the land use desianation. and chanae the permit timina thresholds relative to the comoletion of the Fire Station. located in the Roripauah Ranch Specific Plan Area south and east of the terminus of Murrieta Hot Sprinas Road. north of the terminus of Butterfield Staae Road Associate Planner Kitzerow presented the staff report (of record). Referencing Commissioner Chiniaeff's question', Associate Planner Kitzerow stated there would be a requirement in the Specific Plan (SP) for the applicant to submit a Development Plan that would be reviewed by the Community Services and the Planning Departments, advising that any potential impacts would be reviewed. Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with the Planning Commission being asked to consider an amendment to the Specific Plan before an environmental review has been prepared. In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's concern, Assistant City Attorney Curley clarified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) process and the tiered nature of this process; ensured that an implementation of a Development Agreement Amendment would not occur without further environmental review; that if environmental impacts could not be mitigated, it would be readdressed by the Planning Commission; that at this point, the Planning Commission would only be conducting a broader conceptual move rather than a precise implementation. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Matthew Fagan, representing Asby USA, LLC, noted the following: · That the applicant would be in concurrence with the Conditions of Approval and requested the Commission's support . That the applicant would be in agreement to the imposition of a condition with regard to the Development Plan for the relocation of the park and ride being readdressed by the Planning Commission . That at this point in time, the applicant has not contacted the residents with regard to relocating the park and ride facility. At this time, the public hearing was opened and due to no speakers, it was closed. Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with surrounding residents not being aware of the proposed relocation of the park and ride and questioned whether approvals could be separated with the Specific Plan Amendment being readdressed by the Planning Commission. R:\MinutesPCI020106 5 In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's query, Assistant City Attorney Curley stated that at this point in time, separation of the approvals would create an inconsistency, therefore, creating a problem; that the Planning Commission may approve the broader implementation action but request the City Council to impose the requirement that prior to the approval of the relocation of the facility that it proceed with the Development Plan process, the Environmental Impact Review, and the discretionary review; and that the Planning Commission could make it mandatory that within the Specific Plan (SP), a park and ride facility of this size be constructed. Clarifying the reasoning for the proposed relocation, Associate Planner Kitzerow advised that the approved Operating Memorandum required the Specific Plan Amendment to provide a trail- head (parking lot for access to the City's trail system); that the developer suggested incorporating the park and ride with the trail-head parking lot; that the City will own Planning Area 33b; and that the relocation will not increase Planning Area 11 with regard to commercial square footage. Understanding public noticing requirements, Commissioner Telesio would be hesitant of approving the proposed relocation of the park and ride without a public hearing. For the Planning Commission, Assistant City Attorney Curley confirmed that proper notification measures have been implemented. Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that the Development Agreement could be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a future time with regard to potential impacts of the trail-head parking and lighting. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the Planning Commission recommending to the City Council that the final approval of implementation for the park and ride trail-head be subject to a noticed public Planning Commission meeting; and that if the park and ride were not approved, that there would not be a park and ride in the proposed project. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDroval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR PLANNING AREA 33B OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L) T OPEN SPACE (05)", GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTIONS OF NICHOLAS ROAD BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD (PA06-0009) (APN 964-460-003) R:\MinulesPC1020106 6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06.15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ENTITLED: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.2 (PA05-0341) TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR PLANNING AREA 33B FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L) TO OPEN SPACE (OS) TO ACCOMMODATE PARK AND RIDE AND TRAIL HEAD USES, AND TO RELOCATED THE PARK AND RIDE FACILITY FROM PLANNING AREA 11 TO PLANNING AREA 33B OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN", GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTIONS OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND NICHOLAS ROAD AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD" PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 4.1.6 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PERTAINING TO IMPROVEMENTS AND BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE THRESHOLDS RELATIVE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FIRE STATION IN TRACT 29353," LOCATED IN THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTIONS OF NICHOLAS ROAD AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD, AND MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION PA05-0404)" R:IMinutesPCI020106 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06.17 . A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ENTITLED: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SECTION OF THE MITIGATION PROGRAM APPROVED WITH THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA94-0076) REGARDING THE RELOCATION OF THE PARK AND RIDE FACILITY FROM PLANNING AREA 11 TO PLANNING AREA 33B" GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTIONS OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NICHOLAS ROAD AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD" COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS A. In light of Chairman Mathewson's resignation, the Planning Commission commended Mr. Mathewson on his exceptional leadership. B. Acknowledging staff for its professionalism, Chairman Mathewson relayed that he has enjoyed his experience as a Planning Commissioner. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that Chairman Mathewson has been a great asset to the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT At 7;40 p.m., Chairman Mathewson formally adjourned to Wednesdav. February 15. at 6;30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ~~~< ~~~ Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R:\MinutesPCI020106 8