Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout010307 PC Minutes MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 3, 2007 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Wednesday, January 3, 2007, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Harter led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Carey, Telesio, Harter, Chiniaeff and Chairman Guerriero. Absent: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS No additional comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of December 20, 2006. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Carey seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDroval. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2 Elect new Chair and Vice Chair. MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to elect Commissioner Chiniaeff as Chairman for calendar year 2007. Chairman Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDroval. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to elect Commissioner Telesio as Vice Chair for calendar year 2007. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDroval. R:\MinutesPC\010307 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS New Items 3 Plannino Apqlication No. PA05-0387. a Tentative Tract MaD 130768\. submitted bv Ashbv USA. to subdivide 22.3 qross acres into 123 lots /122 sinole-familv residential lots and one ODen space). within Plannino Areas 23 and 24 of the RoriDauoh Sqecific Plan. located on the north side of South LOOD Road east of the intersection of South LOOD Road and Butterfield Staoe Road Associate Planner Kitzerow provided the Planning Commission with a PowerPoint Presentation, highlighting on the following: o Project Description o Land Use o Environmental Determination. Due to new filing fees imposed by the County for Fish and Game, staff would request a change to Condition of Approval No: 1, which would impose a new filing fee of $1800 for Fish and Game and $50 for the County filing fee; and staff requested the addition of Condition of Approval No. 65a which would require wall plans for the South Loop Road area (where cul-de-sacs end adjacent to South Loop Road) to incorporate view fencing or wall breaks at each of the cul-de- sacs where feasible. In response to Commissioner Guerriero's query regarding off-site improvements, Associate Planner Kitzerow advised that as part of the Development Agreement and Conditions of Approval, the Specific Plan would list all on-and off-site improvements that would be required by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Further clarifying for the Planning Commission, Director of Public Works Hughes advised of the following: o That there would be a Condition of Approval that would impose that the proposed project must meet all Development Agreement conditions which would include all on-and off-site improvements o That by approving the Tentative Map at this time, the Planning Commission would not be providing any relief or ability for the developer to move any further than what was previously anticipated with the original Development Agreement o That No building permits would be issued until all off-site improvements are funded and in the control of the City o That because the Tentative and Final Maps would be the source that would pay the bond debt, it would be to the City's benefit to ensure that the Tentative and Final Maps continue to be processed; advising that if the City were to not approve the Tentative and Final Maps, the City would be hindering the ability to asses the lots into individual ownership and payoff bonds R:\MinutesPC\010307 2 o That by approving the Tentative Map the developer would be in a position to complete the Conditions of Approval and asses Final Maps; but that the developer would not be allowed to pull building permits in the pan area until infrastructure would be complete as identified in the Development Agreement; and that by approving the Tentative Map No new homes would be built until infrastructure would be in place. Director of Public Works Hughes also noted that before issuance of building permits, the developer would be required to have the following completed: o Murrieta Hot Springs Road o Butterfield Stage Road within its complete Specific Plan area o A second access to the south of Rancho California Road (two lanes up to a certain threshold and four lanes down to Rancho California Road on Butterfield Stage Road) o Nicolas Road within its project boundaries o Intersection improvements at Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. Referencing Environmental issues, Director of Public Works Hughes stated that the findings would result in no additional environmental impacts beyond what was originally anticipated with the proposed project. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Director of Public Works Hughes stated that the City has entered into an agreement with the developer and the developer would be allowed to continue with the development plans in exchange for the guarantee that infrastructure would be completed before issuance of building permits. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Via overheads, Mr. Peter Olah, representing Ashby USA, offered the following comments: o That Butterfield Stage Road would be completely graded within the tract boundary o That two bridges have been constructed and back.filled o That sewer, water, and storm drain would be installed as well as in between two bridges within the tract boundary o That water would be installed from Walcott Road to Calle Chapas o That Murrieta Hot Springs Road would be completely paved with base paving from Pourroy Road to Butterfield Stage Road o That underground and street lights would be complete o That a bridge within the tract boundary would be complete o That the whole site would be mass-graded to pad grade o That foundation and slab for the Mega Center would be complete o That foundation has been poured for two buildings in the 20-acre sports park o That the 5.1 acre neighborhood park would be 90% complete o That grading for the south tract boundary to Rancho California Road will be going to bid within in the near future o That the pan-handle portion of the project would be blue topped with most of its infrastructure complete o That approval of the map would not result in an issuance of a building permit until the two lane road from the south boundary would be complete R:\MinutesPC\010307 3 o That the applicant would be in agreement with the imposed Conditions of Approval as well as the change to Fish and Game Fees. Ms. Jo Subik, Temecula, expressed concern with the addition of traffic that the proposed project would create and requested a four-way stop sign installed on Nicolas and Liefer Roads; and that the post office boxes on Nicolas Road be relocated. At this time, the public hearing was closed. COMMISSION DISCUSSION Referencing Nicolas Road, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that there would be substantial improvements to Nicolas Road but would not specifically address a four-way stop sign; that if there were concerns after the road improvements are completed, concerns could be addressed at a Public Traffic Safety Commission meeting. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject to staff's requested changes to the conditions as referenced by staff. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDroval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05-03n, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (NO. 30768) TO SUBDIVIDE 22.34 ACRES INTO 123 LOTS (122 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND ONE OPEN SPACE LOT) WITHIN PLANNING AREAS 23 AND 24 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN. THE PROJECT SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF SOUTH LOOP ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH LOOP ROAD AND BUTTERFIELD STATE ROAD (APN 964- 180-013) 4 Plannino Aoo,lication No. PA06-0113. a Develooment Plan. submitted bv Matthew Fapan. to construct a 50.376 souare foot mixed-use restaurant and office buildino on 0.5 acres located at 42081 3'" Street Per PowerPoint Presentation, Senior Planner Fisk provided information on the following: o General Location o Site Plan o Architecture o Landscaping o Access and Circulation. Senior Planner Fisk also noted that it was the opinion of the Old Town Local Review Board that the Old Town Specific Plan should be amended to allow for fourth floors without the requirement of City Council approval. R:\MinutesPC\010307 4 The following would be recommended changes to the conditions: o That the Fire Department reduced the number of hydrants to Condition of Approval No. 40 o That Condition of Approval Nos. 42, 47, 76b, and 82b and c would not be applicable to the proposed project and should be deleted. Mr. Fisk also advised that a faxed correspondence by the owner of the Stampede was received and that the correspondence expressed concern with the proposed project not providing parking; and noted that it was the opinion of the owner of the Stampede, that the parking lot adjacent to the proposed project was solely for patrons of the Stampede during its operating hours. Senior Planner Fisk informed that there would not be a parking requirement for this type of development in the Tourist Retail Center (TRC) Land Use District. For the Commission, Assistant City Attorney Lee noted that it would be her opinion that there have been discussions between the developer and City with regard to the referenced parking lot, but that she would not be aware of the current status; and advised that it would not have an affect on this project. Further clarifying, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the parking lot in question would be for public parking and would not be exclusive for the Stampede's own sole use;. that the proposed project would be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan and would not require parking; and advised that the City will be building a multi-story parking structure on Mercedes Street that will support adequate parking in Old Town. Commissioner Guerriero expressed some concern with the height of the proposed building as it would relate to the remainder of Old Town, and requested that in the future, staff provide renderings of three-and four story buildings in Old Town. In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's query, Senior Planner Fisk noted that currently there would be three three-story buildings in Old Town. Assistant City Manager Johnson advised that staff may require that the applicant provide renderings to show a perspective as to how three-and four-story buildings would relate to other buildings in Old Town. For Commissioner Guerriero, Senior Planner Fisk noted that the proposed project would not be required to provide moderate income housing. Referencing Channel Street, Director of Public Works Hughes advised that Channel Street would not be an alley for the City but rather a private driveway that would not be available for public use; and would be of the opinion that there would not be much traffic traveling down Channel Street. Commissioner Telesio expressed concern with the public anticipating there to be parking on Channel Street and not finding any. R:\MinutesPC\010307 5 Providing more information with regard to parking in Old Town, Assistant City Manger Johnson advised that the proposed project's projected parking was configured into the City's parking analysis for Old Town. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Walt Allen, representing the applicant, offered the following comments: o That because the original plan for the project would not meet the intent of the City's Development Code, the applicant revised its plans for the project resulting in Channel Street being as presented in staff's report o That the applicant would be of the opinion that Channel Street will change as the area develops o That the applicant would be confident in leaving Channel Street as proposed, ending at the Temecula Community Services District's planter o That the applicant would be of the opinion that a parking structure would be built in the parking-lot which would result in the opening up of Channel Street o That the difference in square footage between the third floor and fourth floor would be less than 3,000 square feet. The following individuals spoke in favof of the proposed project: o Mr. Chris Baily, Temecula o Mr. Ed Dool, Temecula o Mr. Marvin Hayes, Temecula o Mr. Volker Lutz, Murrieta o Mr. Ernie Meth, Temecula o Ms. Patricia Lusin, Murrieta o Ms. Ginger Hitzke, Temecula o Mr. Chuck Hargis, Temecula. The above-mentioned individuals spoke in favof of the proposed project for the following reasons: o That more restaurants in Old Town, the more businesses would thrive o That the merchants and property owners at the north end of Old Town would be in support of the proposed project o That the proposed project will enhance Butterfield Square o That the more patrons in Old Town, the more tax dollars for the City o That the Temecula Arts Council and Temecula Sunrise Rotary Club would be in full support of the proposed project o That Old Town would be in need of more restaurants. At this time, the public hearing was closed. R:\MinutesPC\010307 6 COMMISSION DISCUSSION Commissioner Guerriero noted that although he may have some concern with the height of the proposed project, he supported the architecture of the building and stated that it would be a well- added enhancement to Old Town. Relaying their appreciation for the architecture, Commissioner Harter and Commissioner Carey also relayed their full support for the proposed project. Echoing previously made comments, Chairman Chiniaeff and Commissioner Telesio relayed their full support, noting that it would be a benefit to the Old Town. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the amended and deleted previously mentioned Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDfoval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0113, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED.USE FOUR-STORY RESTAURANT AND OFFICE BUILDING ON 0.5 ACRES LOCATED AT 42081 3RD STREET, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 3RD STREET, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET WEST OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 922- 046-012 5 Plannino Aoolication Nos. PA06-0252 and PA06-0253. a Tentative Tract Mall, 134698\ and I)p,veloo,ment Plan. submitted bv Lennar Homes. to subdivide three lots totalino 8.6 acres int(l 7~ IQt~ ~nd a Product Review for 64 detached sinole-familv cluster homes. located in Tract 34698 at the northwesterlv corner of Date Street and Lakeview Road in the Harveston Soecific Plan Associate Planner Oamko provided a PowerPoint Presentation, noting the following: o Location o Project Description o Tract Map o Architecture Review - Monterey, Italian, and Cottage o Building Elements/Mass, Height, and Scale o Materials and Colors o Product Placement o Environmental Determination. R:\MinutesPC\010307 7 At the request of staff, the following Conditions of Approval should be amended and/or deleted. o Condition of Approval 30c shall be changed to impose a "wrouoht iron material rather than a vinyl fencing" (consistent with Prescott and Barrington product fencing on the other side of the Arroyo Park) to the satisfaction of the Planning Director o That Condition of Approval Nos. 41 and 42 (Fire conditions), 56d, 56e, 30i, and 30m (Public Works conditions) would not be applicable and shall be deleted o That Condition of Approval No. 39 shall be revised to read: Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards or as modified on the Tentative Tract Map o That Condition of Approval Nos. 40 through 45 shall be revised to read "a through f' o That the applicant pay the required increased Fish and Game fees. Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern with the shutters not completely covering the windows. Associate Planner Damko relayed that a Condition of Approval may be added requiring that all shutters completely cover appropriate windows. Commissioner Telesio relayed that it would be his opinion that all garages should have a ventilation window installed. It was noted by Associate Planner Damko stated that the City's Development Code would not require that windows with ventilation be installed on garages. Responding to Chairman Chiniaeff's comment regarding enhanced rear elevations, Associate Planner Damko noted that there would be no special rear elevations for Plan 1, and advised that in addition to the enhanced rears elevations for Plan 3, the existing parkway would be heavily landscaped to screen the proposed project. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested that a Condition of Approval be imposed that would require that the applicant would replace any damaged landscape. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Thanking staff for its efforts, Mr. Ryan Combe, representing Lennar Communities, relayed the following: o That the applicant would be enthusiastic in moving the project forward o That the applicant received approval from residents of the eastern boundary o That the applicant would be in agreement with the Conditions of Approval, with the exception of Planning Condition of Approval No. 30c, noting that staff's request for a wrought iron fence versus vinyl fencing in the rear of the side yards would not be consistent with the City's Specific Plan o That shutters would not be installed on windows that were placed in rows of three o That the proposed project would conform to the City's Development Code; advising that ventilated windows on garages would not be a required condition o That there would not be any Plan 1 s along the perimeter streets. For the Planning Commission, Assistant City Manager Johnson noted that he would be in full support of staff's recommendation of wrought iron fencing. R:\MinutesPC\010307 6 Referencing shutters, Commissioner Guerriero noted that although he understands that shutters cannot be installed on windows of three in a row, shutters may be installed on other remaining windows. For the Planning Commission, Assistant City Manager Johnson advised that it would the Commission's purview to continue the item to allow the applicant an opportunity to develop renderings that would illustrate more shutters as well as demonstrate vinyl fences versus wrought iron fences as requested by staff. Mr. Ernie Gorril, architect for the proposed project, offered the following comments: o That the City's Building Code would require that ventilation be installed on the bottom of garages o That the renderings in staff's report would not be correct advising that there would be shutters On most of the windows o That Plan '1 and Plan 2 would front the street and that its rears would not front onto a public way o That the applicant would be installing enhancements to all garages that would face a public way. Via overheads, Mr. Combe displayed the fencing as per the Specific Plan, noting that the fencing material throughout Harveston would be vinyl. Mr. Scott Crosby, Murrieta, spoke in favor of the proposed project but requested heavy landscaping to all two-story units that would face down onto single-story homes. At this time, the public hearing was closed. COMMISSION DISCUSSION Chairman Chiniaeff requested that staff work with the applicant regarding landscaping and fencing. Relaying his support for the proposed project, Commissioner Telesio also requested that the applicant work with staff regarding landscaping. Concurring with Commissioner Telesio, Commissioner Harter noted he would also be in support of the project and requested that staff work with the applicant with regard to the shutters and wrought iron fencing. Echoing previously made comments, Commissioner Carey requested that staff work with the applicant with regard to the shutters and fencing. Chairman Chiniaeff requested that the applicant be conditioned to upgrade the trees to 24" boxed trees. Agreeing with the Commission, Mr. Combe noted that he would be willing to upgrade the boxed trees to 24" boxes; and that the applicant work with staff regarding landscaping and fencing, as requested by staff. R:\MinutesPC\010307 9 MOTION: Commissioner Carey moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the revised Conditions of Approval requested by staff; that the applicant work with staff with regard to landscaping and shutters; and that the boxed trees be upgraded to 24" boxes. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDfoval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0252, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE THREE LOTS TOTALlNG8.6 ACRES INTO 73 LOTS FOR 64 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WESTERLY CORNER OF DATE STREET AND LAKEVIEW ROAD WITHIN THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN (APN 916-410-001, 019, AND 033) At 7:50 p.m., the Planning Commission took a 1.0-minute break and reconvened the meeting at 8:00 p.m. Chairman Chiniaeff thanked Ms. Craig for the prelude music. 6 Planninq Apolication No. PA06-0060. a Tentative Parcel MaQ /34715\ and Develooment Plan. submitted bv Artisan Communities. for a multi-familv residential oroiect to construct 97 condominium units on 8.9 oross acres. located within Plannino Area 13 of the Redhawk Soecific Plan at the southeast corner of Peach Tree Street and Deer Hollow Wav Associate Planner Schuma provided the Planning Commission with a PowerPoint Presentation, highlighting on the following: o Site Plan o Elevations - Santa Barbara - Monterrey o Architecture o Building Elements/Mass, Height, and Scale o Materials and Colors o Landscaping Analysis o Environmental Determination. Staff requested that the following Conditions of Approval be amended: o Condition of Approval No. 14 (Development Plan), be revised to read: that the applicant shall comply with the noise analysis dated September 22, 2006 o That that Condition of Approval No. 69Jiii be deleted from the Development Code o That Condition of Approval No.1 (Development Plan and Parcel Map) include the Fish and Game's new fee of $1850.00 o That the applicant received written correspondence (dated January 2, 2007) regarding the proposed project (staff's report); and that in response to the letter, staff noted the following: R:\MinutesPC\010307 10 o That the density for the proposed site would be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning for the site o That the site would be zoned for medium-to-high density residential development o That a traffic analysis was performed for the proposed project which determined that the average daily traffic would be acceptable and that no mitigation would be required o That the proposed project would be consistent with the City's zoning requirements o That the site would not be zoned for single-family development o That public notices were sent consistent with all applicable noticing laws. Further clarifying, Director of Public Works Hughes stated the following: o That a traffic analysis was taken during the time the Master Plan was performed o That Peach Tree Street and Deer Hollow Way would meet the General Plan requirements o That cars should not be parking on Peach Tree Street o That he would request that the Police Department patrol Peach Tree Street during peak hours to ensure enforcement o That staff would be of the opinion that Peach Tree Street will not experience a high volume of traffic o That although the proposed project would not have any specific mitigation, the applicant would be required to pay Traffic Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) and signal fees. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Ms. Pam Pullen, representing Artisan Communities, thanked staff for its diligence with the proposed project and offered the following comments: o That the applicant has met with the Homeowners Association on several occasions o That sub-association for the project will be maintaining fences along the proposed project o That the project would provide emergency vehicles access onto Deer Hollow Way. Mr. Randy Yount, Temecula, representing the Redhawk Homeowners Association, spoke in favor of the proposed project and requested that the proposed three-foot slump stone wall (located in the rear portion) be installed as a six-foot wall. The following-mentioned individuals spoke against the proposed project. o Mr. Kevin Scott, Temecula o Mr. Ron Matthews, Temecula o Mr. Pommion, Temecula o Mr. Alfonso Franklin, Temecula o Mr. John Rosingana, Temecula o Mr. Frank Delgado, Temecula o Mr. Hilrry Garnett, Temecula. R:\MinutesPC\010307 11 At this time, the public hearing was closed. The above-mentioned individuals spoke against the project for the following reasons: o That the proposed project would create a negative impact with rega~d to traffic congestion in the Redhawk area o That another lane on Peach Tree Street should be installed o That the timeliness of the public notice were inadequate o That residents would request a continuance o That residents would be concerned with high school students parking in residential areas o That a current traffic study would be warranted o That the proposed project would not be consistent with the Redhawk Development o That the proposed project will lower the value of homes in the Redhawk Community o That Peach Tree Street would not be capable of handling more traffic o That the density of 97 units on 8.9 acres would be too high. Ms. Sara Balder, Temecula, spoke neither for nor against the proposed project, and requested that the hearing be continued to allow residents an opportunity to evaluate the proposed project in more detail. Understanding the concerns of residents, Ms. Pullen advised that a traffic study was prepared for the proposed project in April, 2006; that the proposed project would be consistent with the development standards contained in the Redhawk Specific Plan and Development Code; that as part of the landscape plan, the applicant would be strategically placing trees in residential areas for screening purposes; that the proposed project would create less building mass than single-family homes; that the two entrances off Peach Tree Street would be consistent with the Redhawk Specific Plan; and that the pricing of the proposed project will be determined in Summer 2007. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Further clarifying, Director of Public Works Hughes stated that regardless of what the proposed project's traffic study determined, it would not result in a project being down zoned; that a traffic study would identify possible mitigation; that in this case, it did not identify any required mitigation; that any developed mitigation would only result from the proposed projects impacts, not any other project; and that the proposed project would be consistent with the City's General Plan. Explaining the noticing process, Associate Planner Schuma noted that noticing was adequately posted as required by law. With regard to future road improvements, Director of Public Works Hughes offered the following: o That staff would be hopeful to break ground for the widening of Pechanga Parkway in Spring 2007 o That the City would be working concurrently with the County of Riverside to study the Eastern Bypass Corridor for a possible new freeway interchange with 1-15 o That Deer Hollow Way will continue to be developed to the east and County areas o That there will be many improvements in the south of Temecula in the next 5 to 10 years. R:\MinutesPc\o10307 12 Referencing Commissioner Guerriero's query regarding rear yard fences, Ms. Pullen advised that the applicant would be willing to add a full height block tubular steel combination wall along Deer Hollow Way. Commissioner Guerriero thanked Ms. Pullen for the addition of a full height wall. With regard to high school traffic impacts, Commissioner Guerriero relayed that it would be his opinion that law enforcement should be stepped up in the area; and advised that the proposed project would not cause property values to depreciate. Associate Planner Schuma advised that the notices posted by the post office were dated December 21, 2006. Understanding concerns of residents, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission to continue the item to the February 2, 2007, Planning Commission hearing, to allow for the following: o That staff work with the applicant to strengthen the size and number of trees along the golf course o That the applicant explore the possibility of staggering the units along Deer Hollow Way o That the applicant provide an enhanced landscape concept plan at the February 2, 2007, hearing o That the applicant address the wall along Deer Hollow Way. At this time, the public hearing was re-opened. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved continue Item No.6 to the February 2, 2007, Planning Commission hearing to allow the applicant to work with staff and provide the following: that staff work with the applicant to strengthen the size and number of trees along the golf course edge; that the applicant explore the possibility of staggering the units along Deer Hollow Way; that the applicant provide an enhanced landscape concept plan; and that the applicant address the wall along Deer Hollow Way. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous aDDfoval. COMMISSIONER'S REPORT Commissioner Telesio expressed concern with the color of the Marie Calendars restaurant. In response to Commissioner Telesio's concern, Assistant City Manager Johnson relayed that he will have Code Enforcement provide a report with regard to Marie Calendars, debris concerns of the Home Depot at SR 79-South, and a furniture store along the 1-15 corridor, north of Winchester Road. Commissioner Guerriero commended Director of Public Works Hughes for the SR 79-South improvements and queried on the status of Winchester Road. In response to Commissioner Guerriero's comment with regard to Winchester Road, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the City's intent would be to irrigate and landscape Winchester Road. R:\MinutesPC\010307 13 Commissioner Telesio requested clarification regarding the Planning Commission's purview with regard to CC&Rs. Commissioner Guerriero requested a workshop with Assistant City Manager Johnson and Director of Planning Ubnoske. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Assistant City Manager Johnson advised that he will schedule a joint session with the City Council and Planning Commission. . ADJOURNMENT At 9:23 p.m., Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned to Januarv 17. 2007 at 6:00 p.m., in the' City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. -' ... t~aeff Chairman 7),dh, '" . u t- ~ Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R:\MinutesPC\010307 14