Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-016 CC Resolution ' RESOLUTION NO. 10 -16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ADDENDUM TO A CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION NO. 2 OF APPROXIMATELY 4,510 ACRES, LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTHWEST OF THE EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY LINE, WEST OF INTERSTATE - 15 AND NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY (LR09 -0024) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 08 -110 ' certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation (No. 1), a proposed expansion of the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and Annexation to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District of approximately 4,997 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula Boundary line, west of Interstate -15. The City Council also adopted findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopted a statement of overriding considerations and adopted a mitigation monitoring and reporting program in connection therewith (collectively, "Certified Final Environmental Impact Report" or "Certified Final EIR "). B. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 08 -111 and 08 -112 to apply to the Local Agency Formation Commission ( "LAFCO ") for an expansion of the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and Annexation to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District of approximately 4,997 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula Boundary line, west of Interstate -15 ( "Santa Margarita Annexation Area ") C. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 08 -113 amending the General Land Use Map within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, contingent upon LAFCO's approval of the annexation. D. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 08 -14 ' prezoning the territory of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, contingent upon LAFCO's approval of the annexation. R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 1 ' E. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 08 -15 amending the official zoning map of the City of Temecula by adopting zoning designations Hillside -Santa Margarita (SM) and Open Space Conservation District — Santa Margarita (OS -C -SM) and adopting Hillside Development Standards for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, contingent upon LAFCO's approval of the annexation. F. Thereafter, the City of Temecula submitted to LAFCO a Sphere of Influence Amendment Application and Annexation Application along with requisite application submittal documents in connection therewith for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation proposal ( "LAFCO Applications "). G. On May 12, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 09 -42 confirming that the proposal for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation was pursuant to the Cortese - Knox - Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code. H. On June 4, 2009, LAFCO denied the LAFCO Applications made by the City for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 1 proposal and approved the City's Municipal Service Review; and adopted resolutions in connection therewith on June 25, 2009. I. On July 23, 2009, the City of Temecula submitted an Application for ' Reconsideration by LAFCO of the LAFCO Applications for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 1 proposal. The City's proposal removed approximately 487 acres of the southeast corner of the uninhabited 4,997 -acre Santa Margarita Area Annexation territory, and included revised boundaries of the Sphere of Influence expansion from 4,443 acres to 4,126 acres to match the boundaries of the area to be annexed to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District comprising of 4,510 acres of that certain uninhabited territory located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula boundary line, west of Interstate 15, and north of the San Diego /Riverside County boundary as depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein as though set forth in full ( "Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 "). J. On September 24, 2009 LAFCO denied the City's Application for Reconsideration and determined the City of Temecula must file a new LAFCO Sphere of Influence Amendment Application and a new LAFCO Annexation Application to proceed with the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 proposal. K. On December 3, 2009 LAFCO voted unanimously to waive the one -year waiting period to allow the City to proceed with LAFCO Sphere of Influence Amendment and Annexation Applications for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 proposal and LAFCO approved a reduction in the application fees by fifty percent. ' L. On January 12, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10 -03 authorizing the preparation of documents and actions necessary to proceed with a Sphere of Influence Amendment and Annexation Application for the Santa Margarita R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 2 ' Area Annexation No. 2 proposal pursuant to the Cortese - Knox - Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code. M. The City of Temecula proceeded with the preparation of documents associated with the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 proposal including a General Plan amendment to the Land Use Map, zoning amendment to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code including hillside development standards and pre - zoning designations, and Sphere of influence and Annexation applications (LR09 -0024) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Municipal Code and are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 4,510 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula boundary, west of Interstate 15 and north of the San Diego County /Riverside County boundary referred to as the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 proposal (collectively, the "Amendment "). N. The Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act and pursuant to the Cortese - Knox - Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 commencing with section 56000 of the California Government Code. O. An Addendum to the Certified Final EIR was prepared for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 ( "Addendum ") in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ( "CEQA ") to address the reduced boundaries of the annexation area. P. The Planning Commission considered the Addendum to the Certified Final EIR and the various components of the Amendment on February 3, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Q. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No 10 -02 recommending that the City Council approve the Addendum to the Certified Final EIR attached hereto as Exhibit B and the various components of the Amendment, reaffirm the findings adopted as part of the Final EIR certification and set forth in Exhibit of Resolution No. 08 -110 as remaining applicable to the Revised Annexation project, adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference and adopt Findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No 10- 03 thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions related to the ' Annexation of the Santa Margarita Annexation No. 2. R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 3 ' R. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Custodian of Records. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is custodian of records, and the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based are located at the Office of the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. Section 2. The City Council has considered the Addendum to the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report, along with the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report, and approves the Addendum to the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report attached hereto as Exhibit B, adopts the following findings, and takes the following actions pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act: A. The City Council has reviewed the Addendum to the Certified Final EIR, along with the Certified Final EIR and; in the exercise of its independent judgment, concludes that the Addendum accurately describes the environmental ramifications of reducing the area for which Annexation to the City is sought. B. The City Council finds, based on the evidence in the record, including the Addendum, that the Revised Annexation proposal does not require supplemental or subsequent environmental review because the Revised Annexation area (i) is not a substantial change in the project that would require major revisions to the previously ' Certified Final EIR, (ii) is not a substantial change in the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that would require major revisions to the Certified Final EIR, and (iii) does not constitute new information of substantial importance that was not known at the time the Final EIR was certified. C. The Revised Annexation area is approximately 487 acres smaller than the previously proposed annexation area. If the Revised Annexation is approved by LAFCO, the impacts associated with the annexation would be the same or less than those identified in the Final EIR for the reasons set forth in the Addendum. D. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California, exercising its independent judgment after considering the administrative record, hereby adopts the Addendum to the Certified Final EIR, attached hereto as Exhibit B, reaffirms the findings adopted as part of the Final EIR certification and set forth in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 08 -110 as remaining applicable to the Revised Annexation project, adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. Further, the City Council imposes each mitigation measure as a condition on the Revised Annexation project, and directs City staff to implement and monitor the mitigation measures as described in Exhibit D. R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 4 ' PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23 day of February, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan . Jo es, MMC City Cle k [SEAL] 1 R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 10 -16 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23 day of February, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ' Susan .Jones, MMC City Clerk 1 R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 6 4 i'�F�rR�a KAI �. y� o A ea°a.►�� 1 h c � @XV a �. ,x:aYerF�y®d �r�Pm1�. W. 11, AW pot i ?swi q �,��� PAR ilk ♦ CAM PAP Wil rb IN �► r t om,, ..����i��..�► .• ... 1 ADDENDUM TO THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION Environmental Impact Report / Addendum Prepared for: January 2010 r _—' tyt .. J R • �. . ? 4 �. fi" t y � � , r ` ` a +.' .,T: � � City of Temecula EXHI'BlT "B" ESA ..A 1 ADDENDUM TO THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION Environmental Impact Report / Addendum Prepared for: January 2010 City of Ternecula 9191 lovme Centre Drive SUIe 340 San Diego, CA 92122 &59.639.0900 vrmv.esaesoc,corn Los Angeles Oataana PotaWma Penl&M Sac an to San Francisco Soaltle T-Pa Moaiana I Ills 1 2MO-5.02 (, ESA TABLE OF CONTENTS City of Temecula Addendum to the Santa Margarita Area Annexation Paoe 1. Introduction ................................................................................. ............................... 1 -1 1.1 Purpose and Scope ............................................................. ............................... 1 -1 1.2 Previous Environmental Documentation .............................. ............................... 1 -3 1.3 Findings of this Addendum .................................................. ............................... 1-4 1.4 Use of an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR ............. ............................... 1 -5 1.5 Contact Person .................................................................... ............................... 1 -6 2. Project Description ..................................................................... ............................... 2 -1 2.1 Project Location ................................................................... ............................... 2 -1 2.2 Site Description .................................................................... ............................... 2 -1 ' Figure 1: Proposed Modification of Boundary ..................... ............................... 2 -3 2.3 Project Description ............................................................... ............................... 2 -5 2.4 Project Objectives ................................................................ ............................... 2 -6 2.5 Environmental Setting .......................................................... ............................... 2 -6 2.6 Discretionary Actions and Approvals ................................. ............................... 2 -11 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1 Prior Environmental Review and Discussion ....................... ............................... 3 -1 3.1.1 Air Quality ............................................................................ ............................... 3 -1 3.1.2 Biological Resources ........................................................... ............................... 3-4 3.1.3 Cultural Resources .............................................................. ............................... 3 -8 3.1.4 Land Use and Planning ....................................................... ............................... 3 -9 3.1.5 Mineral Resources ............................................................. ............................... 3 -12 3.1.6 Public Services and Utilities ............................................... ............................... 3 -13 3.1.7 Transportation and Traffic .................................................. ............................... 3 -17 3.1.8 Noise ................................................................................. ............................... 3 -18 3.1.9 Recreation .............................................. ............................... ........................... 3-22 4 . Findings .......................................................................................... ............................4 -1 t: s; 5. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................... ............................... 5 -1 i+ r: 1 yf 1 Y Addendum to Ne City of Temeala Santa MBlgiellO Nae Anrexatlon i ESA /208485.02 EIR January 2010 i CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope This document is an Addendum to the previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2007041085) for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation and related actions, certified by the City of Temecula (City) in December 2008. The certified EIR was also utilized as the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation to support the request for annexation submitted to the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission ( LAFCO). LAFCO denied the annexation request at their June 4, 2009 pubic hearing, adopting related resolutions on June 25, 2009. The City of Temecula is now proposing to submit a revised annexation application to the Riverside County LAFCO to exclude approximately 487 acres of the 4,997 acres previously proposed in the certified Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. The 487 acre not a part area of this amended annexation boundary includes the area proposed for the Liberty Quarry Mine project site and a few adjacent parcels from the previously certified FEIR project. The amended annexation request would reduce the residential development potential within the annexation area from 713 acres with a maximum of 81 new dwelling units and 263 estimated new residents, as proposed under the previous LAFCO application and evaluated by the certified FEIR, to approximately 225 acres with a maximum of 22 new dwelling units and 72 estimated total residents. The remainder of the annexation area is owned by public entities for the purpose of resource conservation and as such, does not have development potential. The amended annexation request would result in an approximate 68% reduction in impacts (acreage reduction of 68 %) to biological and cultural resources and an approximate 73% reduction (dwelling unit reduction of 73 %) to impacts in all other areas as compared to the previous annexation request, evaluated by the certified FEIR. The 68% reduction in impacts to biological and cultural resources is a result of the reduced amount of land (acres) that would have the potential to be developed (or impacted) as a result of the proposed amended annexation area. The amended annexation area would include approximately 4,284; acres of open space and conservation designated lands. This Addendum serves as the environmental review document for the revised annexation request which now encompasses approximately 4,510 Acreage sums are rounded to the nearest whole acre and may vary by one (1) acre due to rounding to the nearest whole acre. 2 22 new dwelling units would be the worst -case scenario based on one (1) dwelling unit per 10 acres and includes reconstruction of 4 existing dwelling units within the 225 -acre residentially zoned portion of the reduced annexation area. ' 3 Acreage sums are rounded to the nearest whole acre and may vary by one (1) acre due to rounding to the nearest whole acre. 4 1bid. Md"Um b qe Gy of Temewla Sams Marparib No Annexasm ESA 1208485.02 EIR Jenaaq 2010 k C i. Imrotluction ' acres), as required pursuant to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and State and local CEQA Guidelines. Under the original proposal, 713 acres within the Santa Margarita Annexation Area (SMAA) designated Rural Mountainous (RM) (1 du/10 acres) under the County of Riverside land use designation was to be changed to Hillside Residential (HR) (1 du /10 acres) under the City of Temecula General Plan land use designation. As noted in the certified FEIR, a total of 718 acres were to be designated as Hillside Residential (HR) under the City's General Plan land use designation because a 5 -acre parcel with an existing residence was proposed to be included in the HR designation, although it is currently within the County's Open Space - Conservation Habitat (OS -CH) designation. This 5 -acre parcel was recently purchased by San Diego State University (SDSU) and is now intended to be used in a manner consistent with the Open Space land use designation and pre - zoning proposed for this property. The residence that currently exists on this parcel would become a legal non - conforming use under the proposed OS -C -SM zone. Therefore, the previously proposed land use designation was to include a total of 713 acres, not 718 acres within the Hillside Residential (HR) (1 dull acres designation). The retraining 4,284 acres within the Santa Margarita Annexation area is currently designated as Open Space Conservation Habitat (OS -CH) under the County or Riverside's land use designation and the proposed General Plan Amendment proposes to change the entire 4,284 acre portion of ' the project area currently designated as Open Space Conservation Habitat (OS -CH) under the County of Riverside's General Plan land use designation, to the City of Temecula General Plan land use designation of Open Space (OS). This will remain identical in the amended annexation request. Please refer to the comparison below. COMPARISON OF THE ADDENDUM TO THE SANTA MARGARITA ANNEXATION TO THE ORIGINAL PROPOSED PROJECT Santa Margarita Area Annexation Component of Development Certified FOR Addendum to the FEIR Single-family 713 acres with 81 new dwelling units 225 acres with 22 new dwelling units residential Open Space & 4,284 acres 4,284 acres Conservation Estimated New 283 72 Residents° a Subsequent purchase by SDSU of 5 -acre parcel acres is now intended to be used in a manner consistent with the Open Space land use designation and pre - zoning proposed for this property. The residence that currently exists on this parcel would become a legal non- conforming use under the proposed OS -C -SM zone. Therefore, the previously proposed land use designation was to include a total of 713 acres, not 718 acres within the Hillside Residential (HR) (1 dull acres designation). to 225 acres Is the total allowable acreage for development of new dwelling units using the underlying General Plan land use del gnatlons. At 1 dull acres. 22 units would result. e It is noted that the city of Temecula uses a population generation rate of 3.24 Persons per single - family dwelling unit while the County of Riverside General Plan utilizes a population generation rate of 3.01 persons per dwelling unit, The estimated number of new residents reflects the higher estimated population calculation. Addandgm to the Chyof Temews Sams Margarita Area Annmtatlon 1-2 ESA / 200405.02 EIR bnuery2010 1. IntrodmHon Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and State and local CEQA Guidelines, the City is the Lead j Agency and is charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve the proposed project. As part of the decision - snaking process, the City is required to review and consider the potential environmental effects that could result from the modification of the annexation request analyzed in the previously certified EIR. In addition, LAFCO will use this addendum as the CEQA document for any action that they take on the revised annexation request. Since certification of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR, the County of Riverside has released and circulated the Liberty Quarry Draft EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2007061104) which addresses impacts resulting from development of the proposed Liberty Quarry Mine to be located within the 487 acre segment excluded from this amended annexation request. The Draft EIR was available for a 60 -day public review and comment period from July 20, 2009 through September 18, 2009 and extended an additional 60 days through November 23, 2009. The FEIR has not been released and the project has not been scheduled for a public hearing at the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. 1.2 Previous Environmental Documentation In December 2008, the City of Temecula City Council certified the FEIR for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. For the purposes of this Addendum, the FEIR refers to all project documents, including the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The FEIR addressed potential impacts associated with the Santa Margarita Area Annexation and associated discretionary and ministerial actions. The originally approved FEIR involved the annexation of 4,997 acres into the City which was to include a Sphere of Influence expansion for the city; an amendment to its General Plan Land Use Map designating the land uses within the sphere of influence expansion areas; the pre - zoning of the annexation area with zoning designation consistent with the land use designation; and seeking approval for the annexation from LAFCO. The originally approved FEIR included the following land use applications: Planning Application PA07 -0225 Planning Application PA07 -0225 consisted of two components an amendment to the city of Temecula General Plan (General Plan Amendment) and the pre- zoning of the subject property (Change of Zone) described as follows: • General Plan Amendment proposed to amend the General Plan's Land Use Map with land use designations over the 4,443 acres of the subject property located outside of the city of Temecula's current sphere of influence. The 477 acres currently designated RM I DU /10 AC in Riverside County would become Hillside Residential (HR) 1 DU /10 AC in the city of Temecula, 3,961 acres of the 3,966 acres designated OS -CH in the County would be designated Open Space (OS) in the City and 5 acres currently designated OS -CH in the County would become FIR 1 DU /10 AC in the city of Temecula. The amendment would only become effective if the previous annexation request had been approved by LAFCO. Mawr to ere cay of Tanewa sanw Margarits Area Mrrema 1 -3 ESM205155.02 FIR Jawary2010 1. Intmduction ' • Change of Zone proposed the pre - zoning of approximately 4,997 acres with zoning designations which would follow the same boundaries used for the general plan land use designations including 4,284 acres with a zoning district of "Conservation-Santa Margarita" (OS- C -SM); and 718 acres designated with a zoning district of "Hillside Residential -Santa Margarita" (HR -SM), allowing development of 1 DU /10 AC. The proposed pre- zoning will establish two new zones specifically for the SMAA through the adoption of the Hillside Development Standards. This zone change proposal will modify the existing range of permitted uses, which now include residential, open space, and mining to primarily residential and open space uses. The pre - zoning would only become effective if the previous annexation had been approved by LAFCO. Planning Application PA07 -0226 • Sphere of Influence Expansion proposed the expansion of the city of Temecula's sphere of influence to include that 4,443 -acre portion of the 4,997 -acre SMAA outside of the city's current sphere of influence, with ultimate approval by LAFCO. • Annexation proposed the annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,997 acres into the city of Temecula, with ultimate approval by LAFCO. • LAFCO denied both the sphere amendment and annexation requests. With the exception of mineral resources, air quality, transportation and traffic, and noise impacts, ' the FEIR identified that impacts from the entire project would be either less than significant or mitigated to below a level of significance. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was prepared and adopted. 1.3 Findings of this Addendum Pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, this Addendum has been prepared to determine whether the project will result in a change in circumstances, new impacts, or new information of substantial importance requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. This examination includes an analysis of the provisions of Section 21166 of CEQA and Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines and their applicability to the proposed project. The focus of this examination is whether the CEQA analysis conducted, as described in the previously certified FEIR, adequately addresses the impacts associated with an annexation area that is reduced by 487 acres from the 4,997 acres (previously proposed in the Santa Margarita Area Annexation certified FEIR) as part of this Addendum. As concluded in Chapter 3 of this document, the mitigation measures established in the certified Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR would more than adequately mitigate the impacts resulting from implementation of the reduced acreage project. This Addendum reviews new information that was not known and could not have been known with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR was certified. MOenlum to the Oty of Tem pA Santa Margarita Area Mnaxati0n 1-4 ESA 1208485.02 EIR January 2010 1. IntrodOafion 1.4 Use of an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR Section 15164(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be prepared "if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred." Section -15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines identifies the conditions that require preparation of a subsequent EIR. A proposed change in a project will require preparation of a subsequent EIR if: 1. The change in the project is substantial. Substantial changes in the project are those that would require major revision of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects, or if a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects has occurred. 2. The circumstances under which the project is undertaken have substantially changed. Substantial changes in circumstances are those defined as those that would require major revisions of the previous EIR in order to describe and analyze new significant environmental effects, or any changes that would cause a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. ' 3. New information ofsubstantial importance, which was not known and could have not been known, with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, .shows: A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; B. The significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than . identified in the previous EIR; C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or D. Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. If none of the above conditions is met, as is the case with this amended project, the City may i require preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or an Addendum, or the City may decide that no further environmental documentation is necessary. The City has elected to proceed with this Addendum. 9 ' This Addendum has evaluated each of the issues addressed in the FEIR, as well as each of the issues contained in the discussion presented in Chapter 3 of this document. Based on this Addendum to the City of Temewla Sama Margarita Area Anneotion 1 -5 E841208485.02 EIR January2010 1. Introdmton analysis and the information contained herein, there is no evidence that the ro osed P P project requires major changes to the FEIR. Comparison of the previous project with the reduced project, as described in Chapter 3 of this document, indicates that there are no new significant environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project and mitigation, as described in the FEIR. This Addendum relies on use of an Environmental Checklist Form, as suggested in Section 15063 (d)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The Checklist Form is used: • To evaluate whether there are any new or more severe significant environmental effects associated with implementation of the proposed project and proposed amendments; and • To review whether there is new information or circumstances that would require preparation of additional environmental documentation in the form of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, or if an Addendum is appropriate. Chapter 3 of this document contains the discussion summarizing the responses to the questions on the form covering required environmental issues. 1.5 Contact Person ' The Lead Agency for the Addendum for the proposed project is the City of Temecula. Any questions about the preparation of this Addendum, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be refereed to the following: Betsy Lowrey, Assistant Planner Community Development Department City of Temecula PO Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Telephone: 951- 693 -3959 Fax: 951 - 694 -6477 1 _ AtloNqum to Ne City of Temeada Santa Margarita Area Annexation 1 -6 ESAl20B485.02 EIR January 2010 CHAPTER 2 Project Description 2.1 Project Location The amended SMAA project site is comprised of approximately 4,510 acres located in the unincorporated portion of Riverside County, along the northern side of the San Diego - Riverside County line and west of Interstate 15 (I -15) and southwest of the City (Figure 1). This area is comprised of Riverside County's portion of the SMER and adjacent properties. 2.2 Site Description The amended project site consists of approximately 4,510 acres of publicly and privately owned primarily undeveloped land; most of which is undisturbed natural open space within the SMER. The majority of the area is comprised of steep hills with scattered outcroppings of granite ' boulders, sloping in a southwesterly direction with elevations ranging from approximately 530 feet to 2,330 feet above mean sea level (msl). Within the lower reaches of the project area is the Santa Margarita River which flows year round. From the river bottom up into the hills are many seasonal drainages. Within the entire 4,510 -acre project area there are only six occupied dwelling units with two dwelling units occasionally used by the San Diego State University (SDSU) Field Station Program to house researchers. The remaining privately -held properties, outside of the SMER, are currently vacant. At various locations within the SMER are scientific monitoring stations related to SDSU's research programs. The pristine nature of this area has made it a valuable resource for ecological study. The project area includes approximately 225 acres of private property within which only four lots are developed with single - family homes. Two of the six homes within the project area are part of the SMER and are only occupied by those individuals conducting research. The other four occupied properties are primarily large ranch estates involved with agriculture or equestrian activities. The SMER is a key part of preserving the entire Santa Margarita River, one of the last free- flowing rivers in coastal southern California, and its rich ecosystem. The Santa Margarita River I officially begins northeast of the project site, at the confluence of Temecula Creek and Murrieta Creek at the Temecula city limits. The River flows through the Temecula Gorge and ultimately empties into the ocean through the largely undisturbed lands of Camp Pendleton. The upper ' watershed of the Santa Margarita River is thus the combined watersheds of Temecula and r ApEarMaro to Ora City N TOMWAa SaMa MarpaMa Area M cation 2 -1 ESA) 208485.02 EIR Jawary 2010 2. Project oesdnplion Murieta Creeks (please refer to Figure 2-4 of the September 22, 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR certified December 9, 2008)]. Within the project area 4,284 acres have a Riverside County General Plan Land Use Designation of "Open Space - Conservation Habitat' (OS -CH) while the remaining acres are designated "Rural Mountainous" (RM). The OS -CH designation applies to public and private lands conserved and managed in accordance with adopted Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and other conservation plans. The RM designation is for single - family residential uses with a minimum lot size of 10 acres. Within this designation there is an allowance for limited animal keeping, agriculture, recreational uses, compatible resource development (which may include the commercial extraction of mineral resources with approval of a surface mining permit) and associated uses and governmental uses. Currently, most of the project area is zoned "Rural Residential' (R -R). The R -R zone allows a minimum lot size of 0.5 acres. A small area comprised of 118 acres is currently zoned R -A -20 (Residential Agricultural with a 20 -acre minimum lot size). The majority of the private properties currently have a Riverside County Land Use designation of RM (please refer to Figure 2 -5 and Figure 2 -6 of the September 22, 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation EIR). 1 g 4 E i �! Addendum to Na Cirycf Temecula Senb AlBrpedla Area AanBaeGM 2.2 EIR ESA/2M485.02 .02 January 2010 }' c s TI ' — ! 19 1 1 j 1 2. Pm)ect Description This page left intentionally blank li Adderdum to the Chy of Te IaSSW MuWwAmaM= on 2-4 ESA I 2DBM.D2 ER AnmryMIO 2. Project Description 2.3 Project Description The proposed project is the annexation of 4,510 acres into the City which will include a Sphere of Influence expansion for the city; an amendment to its General Plan Land Use Map designating the land uses within the sphere of influence expansion areas; the pre- zoning of the annexation area with zoning designation consistent with the land use designation; and seeking approval for the annexation from LAFCO. The proposed SMAA includes the following land use applications: Planning Application LR09 -0024 Planning Application LR09 -0024 consists of the following components described as follows: • General Plan Amendment proposing to amend the General Plan's Land Use Map with land use designations over the 4,126 acres of the subject property located outside of the city of Temecula's current sphere of influence. The 159 acres currently designated RM I DU /10 AC in Riverside County will become HR 1 DU /10 AC in the city of Temecula, 3,966 acres designated OS -CH in the County will be designated OS in the city of Temecula. • Change of Zone proposing the pre - zoning of approximately 4,510 acres with zoning designations which follow the same boundaries used for the general plan land use designations including 4,284 acres with a zoning district of "Conservation -Santa Margarita" (OS- C -SM); and approximately 225 acres designated with a zoning district of "Hillside Residential -Santa Margarita" (HR -SM), allowing development of 1 DU /10 AC. The proposed pre - zoning will establish two new zones specifically for the SMAA through the adoption of the Hillside Development Standards. This zone change proposal will modify the existing range of permitted uses, which now include residential, open space, and mining to primarily residential and open space uses. • Sphere of Influence Expansion proposing the expansion of the City of Temecula's sphere of influence to include that 4,126 -acre portion of the 4,510 -acre SMAA outside of the city's current sphere of influence, with ultimate approval by LAFCO. • Annexation proposing the annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,510 acres into the city of Temecula, with ultimate approval by LAFCO. Pre - zoning applies to land that is adjacent to the current City boundaries, but is not yet part of the City. The pre - zoning process provides a description of the activities the City would potentially allow on subject property once it becomes part of the City. The approval and implementation of the previously outlined planning applications by the City and LAFCO would result in the ability of the underlying private landowners to potentially develop on a 225 acre area under the HR -SM zoning designation, which is limited to 1 DU /10 AC and which will g permit a maximum of 22 new dwelling units to be built. The City's designation does allow a number of uses other than residential (i.e. ' churches, educational facilities, libraries, day care centers, bed and breakfast establishments). A variety of open spacelconservation compatible land uses would also be allowed under these A80en8um to ma city o(TemecWe Santa Margalu Area Annexa8m 2-5 ESA /20848&02 �- EIR . ftary2010 w 2. Project Description proposed general plan and zoning designations. A total of 22 single - family dwelling units is considered a worst case scenario, as four dwelling units already exist and may never be reconstructed and the actual development of the remaining dwelling units is heavily constrained by numerous environmental and physical design constraints including: topography; domestic water supply; wastewater disposal; dry utilities; primary and secondary access; land- locked parcels; geotechnical considerations; on -site fire department water storage requirements (a minimum of 120,000 gallons per dwelling unit) and emergency access requirements; sensitive habitat and species issues; and MSHCP conservation requirements. It should be noted that it is considered highly likely that many residential parcels could not meet these development requirements on an individual basis. The proposed hillside development standards would require specific setback, massing, landscaping and fuel modification requirements, and would prohibit mass grading and wholesale vegetation clearing for agricultural purposes. As such, individual dwelling units would be constructed as custom homes and would be required to incorporate sensitive design considerations into the planning of each site. It is not possible to forecast when all 22 units would be constructed, as it is dependent on the intentions of each underlying landowner, market conditions and the economic feasibility of complying with the above - outlined environmental, physical and design constraints. A reasonable phasing assumption would entail development of 5 homes per year, which would require approximately 5 years to construct all 22 single - family dwelling units allowed under the proposed planning applications. hi order to implement a worst case scenario to be analyzed in this document, it will be assumed that all 22 single- family units will be developed by 2015, and all impact analyses in this document will be based on the residential units being constructed by this year. 2.4 Project Objectives A clear statement of project objectives allows for the analysis of reasonable alternatives to the proposed project. A range of reasonable alternatives, both on- and off -site, that would feasibly attain most of the basic project objectives, while avoiding or substantially lessening the significant effects of the project, must be analyzed per CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6. The City has identified the following planning objectives for the SMAA: • To integrate the SMAA area into the City's General Plan, adopting general plan and zoning amendments that establish the general framework for ultimate development within the study area. • To preserve public lands within the SMAA area in natural open space; while retaining the existing rural residentiallagricultural character of privately -owned lands. • To protect the research value of the SMER by prohibiting incompatible land uses within adjacent properties. 2.5 Environmental Setting Geology and Soils ' The project site is located at the southern end of the Temescal Valley located in western Riverside County. The Temescal Valley can generally be described as ranging from the Riverside AddeMm M the GIY of Temewie Santa Margarita Area Ameratim 2-6 ESA /20848&02 t EIR Januag2D10 #: 2. Project Description ' County /Orange County line east to the Perris Valley and from the city of Corona south to the Riverside County /San Diego County line. The northern portion of the Temescal Valley including the Lake Elsinore area, generally drains north into the Santa Ana River; while the southern portion of'remescal Valley generally drains south into the Santa Margarita River by way of Temecula Creek and Murrieta Creek. The Temescal Valley area is located in the northern part of the Peninsular Range province and is dominated by rocks of the southern California batholith. The multiple intrusives of the batholith have invaded older metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks of Paleozoic through early Cretaceous ages (570 to 98 million years ago). Bodies of these metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks now crop out along the edges of the batholithic rocks and as roof pendants within batholithic rocks. Rocks of Late Cretaceous through Holocene age (98 million years ago to the present) were deposited over the eroded surfaces of these older rocks and crop out in the major drainages. These younger rocks are mostly conglomerates, claystoncs, and sandstones of marine and continental origin. Typical rock types that can be found in this area include: • Pre- Batholithic Rocks: Jurupa Complex (gneiss, schist, quartzite and marble), Bedford Canyon Formation (quartzites, slates, and argillites), Santiago Peak Volcanics (pyrite and pyrrhotite), Terescal Wash Quartz Latite Porphyry (porphyritic quartz latite). ' • Southern California Batholith Rocks: Gabbro, quartz diorite, granodiorite, and granite. ; (Silica, feldspar, lithium minerals, micas and gemstones.) 3 • Post- Batholithic Rocks: Cretaceous Formations (sandstone, cobble and small boulder conglomerate, siltstone and shale), Silverado Formation (marine clays, silts, quartz and arkosic sands), Vaqueros and Sespe Formations (sandstone and conglomerate). The City is located in one of the most seismically active areas of southern California. The city is traversed by the Elsinore fault and has historically experienced earthquakes of moderate magnitude. The Elsinore fault zone, which is located in proximity to the eastern boundary of the SMAA, is one of the largest in southern California and in historical times, has been one of the quietest. The southeastern extension of the Elsinore fault zone, the Laguna Salads fault, ruptured in 1892 in a magnitude 7.0 earthquake, but the main trace of the Elsinore fault zone has only seen one historical event greater than magnitude 5.2: the magnitude 6.0 earthquake of 1910 near Temescal Valley, which produced no known surface rupture and did little damage. Other faults surrounding the City include the San Andreas, San Jacinto, San Gabriel, Newport - Inglewood, Sierra Madre -Santa Susana- Cucamonga, Rose Canyon, Coronado Banks, San Diego Trough, and San Clemente Island faults. p 1! The eastern portion of the annexation area is part of Cieneba -Rock land- Fallbrook association that is characterized by well - drained and somewhat excessively drained soils. Typically, these soils are very shallow to moderately deep soils in undulating to steep areas and have a surface layer of sandy loam and fine sandy loam on a granitic rock base. The western portion of the ' annexation area is identified as being within the Cajalco- Temescal -Las Posas association which is characterized as well - drained soils in undulating to steep areas. These soils are moderately deep Addenaanlo0le Cftyof Te la sam MwPrft veaA O*1bn 2 -7 ESA /205x55.02 t' EIR J Wry2010 2. Project Deudplbn '.. to shallow soils that have a surface layer of fine sandy loam and loam found on gabbro and latite- porphyry. According to the soil survey information from the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the primary soil types within the project boundary are Cajalco rocky fine sandy loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes, eroded (CbF2), Cieneba rocky sandy loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes, eroded (CkF2), Fallbrook rocky sandy loam, shallow, 15 to 50 percent slopes, eroded (FcF2), Las Posas rocky loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes, severely eroded (LkF3) and Rockland (RtF). A number of other soil types are found within the project boundary in small quantities throughout the site. Air Quality The proposed project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District ( SCAQMD). The SCAB consists of Orange County, the coastal and mountain portions of Los Angeles County, as well as Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Regional and local air quality within the SCAB is affected by topography, atmospheric inversions, and dominant onshore flows. Topographic features such as the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains form natural horizontal barriers to the dispersion of air contaminants. The presence of atmospheric inversions limits the vertical dispersion of air pollutants. With an inversion, the temperature initially follows a normal pattern of decreasing temperature with increasing altitude, however, at some elevation, ' the trend reverses and temperature begins to increase as altitude increases. This transition to increasing temperature establishes the effective mixing height of the atmosphere and acts as a barrier to vertical dispersion of pollutants. p Dominant onshore flow provides the driving mechanism for both air pollution transport and (€ pollutant dispersion. Air pollution generated in coastal areas is transported east to inland receptors by the onshore flow during the daytime until a natural barrier (the mountains) is confronted, limiting the horizontal dispersion of pollutants. The result is a gradual degradation of air quality from coastal areas to inland areas, which is most evident with the photochemical pollutants such as ozone formed under reactions with sunlight. The project site is located within SCAQMD Source Receptor Area (SRA) 25. The most recent published data applicable to SRA 25 indicates that the baseline air quality conditions in the project area include occasional events of very unhealthful air. However, the frequency of smog alerts has dropped significantly in the last decade. Ozone (0 particulates are the two most significant air quality concerns in the project area. The yearly monitoring records document that prior to 1997, approximately one -third or more of the days each year experienced a violation of t the state homy ozone standard, with around ten days annually reaching first stage alert levels of 0.20 parts per million (ppm) for one hour. It is encouraging to note that ozone levels have dropped significantly in the last few years with less than one -fifth of the days each year experiencing a violation of the state hourly ozone standard since 1997. Locally, no second stage alert (0.35 ppm/hour) has been called by SCAQMD in the last ten years. ' The California Air Resources Board (CARB) maintains records as to the attainment status of air basins throughout the state, under both state and federal criteria. The portion of the SCAB within Ad"M to the City of TemeWa Santo Margarita Ana Amexatbn 2-8 ESA /208185.02 EIR J .y 2010 2. Pmiect Daec,iptlon ' which the proposed project is located is designated as a non - attainment area for ozone, particulate matter less than 10 microns (PM -10), and Particulate Matter less than 2.5 microns (PM -2.5) under both state and federal standards. Detailed discussions of the air quality setting and air pollution related to the project site are included in Section 3.1 (Air Quality) of this document. Biological Resources The City is located within the western Riverside County MSHCP` area. The overall biological goal of the MSIICP is to maintain and restore biological diversity and natural ecosystem processes that support diversity in natural areas within westem Riverside County known to support threatened, endangered or key sensitive populations of plant and wildlife species. The MSHCP identifies five geographic locations within the City and surrounding areas that contain potential regional wildlife corridor linkages, including French Valley, Lower Tucalota Creek, Temecula Creek, Pechanga Creek, and Murrieta Creek. Additionally, the Santa Ana Palomar Mountains Linkage straddles the San Diego County Northern MSHCP and the Riverside County Western MSHCP. This jurisdictional division placed an artificial boundary directly through the Linkage. The SMAA project site consists of approximately 4,510 acres of primarily undeveloped land and ' a 5 -mile stretch of the protected Santa Margarita River. The majority of the project area is undisturbed and is in a pristine natural area, of which 4,284 acres have been conserved in the [ SMER within the project boundary. F The SMER adjoins a "Special Linkage Area" of the Riverside County MSHCP. The SMER lies in the chaparral /coastal sage and scrub /oak woodland vegetation zone of southern California. The climate is Mediterranean, with cool wet winters and warn summers moderated by the marine influence of the Pacific Ocean that lies 18 miles (30 kilometers (km)) to the west. Mean annual precipitation is approximately 400 mm and the mean annual temperature about 16.4'C. The topography is complex consisting of low hills and intervening drainages. The majority of the area is comprised of steep hills with scattered outcroppings of granite boulders sloping in a southwesterly direction with elevations ranging from approximately 530 feet to 2,330 feet above msl. The northern portion of the reserve is dominated by the deep gorge of the Santa Margarita River. Most of the project site is covered by low shrub vegetation, a mosaic of mixed chaparral, chamise chaparral, and coastal sage, oak and riparian woodlands are found in the deeper drainages. Sycamore, cottonwood, and willow forests are part of a protected riparian corridor in the SMER. Coast live oak occurs along ephemeral drainages. The upland areas of the reserve support coastal sage scrub and southern mixed chaparral. Some native grassland occurs in small isolated patches. Scattered self - seeded orange, avocado and eucalyptus groves are also found throughout the project area. PACenuot to the Qty N Temeala Sanb MargadV Prey Anr aam 2 -9 ESA /208485.07 EIR Januag2oto *i g S� 2. Protect Description The SDSU Field Station Program for the SMER has conducted significant research of natural communities found within the reserve. The research has documented the observation of 181 animal species within the SMER. Additionally, the California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and SMER records identify 20 sensitive species as occurring within or in proximity to the annexation area. Two of these species, least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) and California gnatcatcher (Polioptila calt(ornica californica) are federally and/or state listed endangered species. Other sensitive wildlife species documented within the SMER include: two - striped garter snake (Thamnophis hammondii), northern red diamond rattlesnake (Crotalus ruber ruber), Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperii), Sharp- shinned Hawk (Accipiterstriaues), Bell's Sage Sparrow (Amphirpiza belli belli), Golden Eagle (Aquila chryraetos), White - tailed Kite (Elanus leucurus), Loggerhead Shrike (Lanus ludovicianus), Orange- throated Whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus), western spadefoot toad (Spea hammondii), southwestern pond turtle (Actinemys marmorala pallida), and Arroyo chub (Gila orcuttii). The research has documented the observation of 331 plant species. Three sensitive plant species, the San Diego thorn mint (Acanthomintha ilicifolia), rainbow manzanita (Arctostaphylos rainbowensis) and Parry's tetracoccus (Tetracoccus dioicus). A CNPS species 1B.2 plant has been documented on the project site during SDSU surveys. San Diego thorn mint is a federally listed threatened and California listed endangered species. Rainbow manzanita is a California ' Native Plant Society (CNPS) list 1B.1 species. Mineral Resources i Riverside County has diverse mineral resources, including extensive deposits of clay, limestone, iron, sand, and aggregates that have been influential in the development of the area and serve as an important component of the County's economy. Riverside County consists predominantly of igneous and metamorphic rock with some sedimentary units. They vary from hard rock underlying steep slopes of the San Jacinto Mountains to the weathered granitic rocks of Joshua Tree National Park and hillsides near the city of Riverside. Alluvial (river) valleys between these mountain ranges contain sediments with significant variation in thickness. Some valleys are filled with a few hundred feet of Pleistocene and Holocene sediments, whereas others, such as the Coachella, San Jacinto and Elsinore Valleys, contain several thousand feet to several miles of sediment. The thickest sediments have been deposited in basins that are being pulled apart by the movement of tectonic plates. In the Temescal Valley, where the SMER area is located typical rock types that can be found include: • Pre - Batholithic Rocks: Jurupa Complex (gneiss, schist, quartzite and marble), Bedford Canyon Formation (quartzites, slates, and az illites Santiago Peak Volcanics Y (q , g ), g (pyrite and pyrrhotite), Temescal Wash Quartz Latite Porphyry (porphyritic quartz latite). • Southern California Batholith Rocks: Gabbro, quartz diorite, granodiorite, and granite. (Silica, feldspar, lithium minerals, micas and gemstones). • Post - Batholithic Rocks: Cretaceous Formations (sandstone, cobble and small boulder ' conglomerate, siltstone and shale), Silverado Formation (marine clays, silts, quartz and arkosic sands), Vaqueros and Sespe Formations (sandstone and conglomerate). Meenaum to ma Gty of Tamecvla Santa Margarita fives MneadiDn 2 -10 EW 20808502 s EIR January 2010 2. Project Description ' The site specifically has rock types that include primarily Cretaceous igneous granitic rocks, Jurassic marine sedimentary rocks and Mesozoic basic intrusive rocks. Cretaceous -age granitic bedrock is exposed throughout the area. The bedrock is comprised primarily of quartz and feldspar. The County of Riverside General Plan shows that the SMER area is located within an MRZ -3 zone; indicating that available geologic information indicates that mineral resources are likely to exist, but the significance of the deposit is undetermined. The County General Plan, however, recognizes that further exploration work could result in the reclassification of all or part of these areas into the specific localities into MRZ -2 category. The designation for the Liberty Quarry site changed from MRZ -3 to MRZ -2, which is located outside of the currently proposed annexation area. Specifically, the area of the Liberty Quarry site is located within the original boundary (area of land within the red line), but outside of the proposed modified boundary (area of land without the blue cross - hatching) on Figure 1. For the purposes of this addendum, the impact analysis will focus on the proposed project which is the proposed 4,510 -acre SMAA project which includes: (1) General Plan Amendment to adopt land use designations for 4,126 acres (OS and HR, I DU /10 AC) located outside of the City's current sphere of influence; (2) adoption of pre- zoning to implement the General Plan land use designations and hillside development standards, which will be conditioned on LAFCO approval ' of the annexation; (3) resolutions of application to LAFCO for an expansion of the City's sphere of influence to include the portion of the annexation area not already in the City sphere of influence and for annexation of the project area to the City; and (4) LAFCO consideration of the proposed sphere expansion and annexation. 2.6 Discretionary Actions and Approvals The certified FEIR and this addendum serve as informational documents for use by public agencies, the general public, and decision makers. The certified FOR and this addendum discuss the impacts of development pursuant to the proposed project and related components and analyze project alternatives. The certified FEIR and this addendum will be used by the City and responsible agencies in assessing impacts of the proposed project. The following public officials and agencies will use the certified FEIR and this addendum when considering the following actions: City of Temecula Planning Commission 1. Recommendation to the Temecula City Council for approval of this addendum to the certified e Final Environmental Impact Report EA -128. r 2. Recommendation to the Temecula City Council regarding approval of Planning Application LR09 -0024 consisting of: I The MRZ -2 designation means that adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present or there is a high likelihood for their presence and development should be controlled. AOGen to are City of Twmla sent. Maiparita Area Aral. 2 -11 ESAl2084&5.o2 EIR January 2oto 2. Project Description ' • Sphere of Influence Expansion proposing the expansion of the city of Temecula's sphere of influence to include that 4,126 -acre portion of the 4,510 -acre SMAA outside of the city's current sphere of influence. • Annexation proposing the annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,510 acres into the city of Temecula • General Plan Amendment proposing to update the General Plan's Land Use Map with land use designations over 4,126 acres of the SMAA is located outside of the city's current sphere of influence. The 159 acres currently designated RM (1 DU /10 AC) in Riverside County will become HR (1 DU /10 AC) in the city of Temecula, 3,966 acres designated OS -CH in the County will be designated OS in the city of Temecula. • Change of Zone proposing the pre - zoning of approximately 4,510 acres with zoning designations which follow the same boundaries used for the general plan land use designations including 4,284 acres with a zoning district of "Conservation -Santa Margarita" (OS- C -SM); and approximately 225 acres designated with a zoning district of "Hillside Residential -Santa Margarita" (HR -SM), allowing development of 1 DU /10 AC. The proposed pre - zoning will establish two new zones specifically for the SMAA through the adoption of the Hillside Development Standards. This zone change proposal will modify the existing range of permitted uses, which now include residential, open space, and mining to primarily residential and open space uses. 's ' City of Temecula City Council r L Approval of this addendum to the certified Final Environmental impact Report EA -128. 2. Approval of Planning Application LR09 -0024 consisting of: S 4 Sphere of Influence Expansion proposing the expansion of the city of Temecula's g sphere of influence to include that 4,126 -acre portion of the 4,510 -acre SMAA outside of # the City's current sphere of influence. #$ • Annexation proposing the annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,510 acres into the city of Temecula. e General Plan Amendment proposing to update the General Plan's Land Use Map with land use designations over the 4,126 acres of the SMAA is located outside of the City's current sphere of influence. The 159 acres currently designated RM (1 DU /10 AC) in Riverside County will become HR (1 DU /10 AC) in the city of Temecula, 3,966 acres designated OS -CH in the County will be designated OS in the city of Temecula. • Change of Zane proposing the pre- zoning of approximately 4,510 acres with zoning designations which follow the same boundaries used for the general plan land use designations including 4,284 acres with a zoning district of "Conservation -Santa Margarita" (OS- C -SM); and approximately 225 acres designated with a zoning district of "Hillside Residential -Santa Margarita" (HR -SM), allowing development of 1 DU /10 AC. The proposed pre - zoning will establish two new zones specifically for the SMAA through the adoption of the Hillside Development Standards. This zone change proposal ' will modify the existing range of permitted uses, which now include residential, open space, and mining to primarily residential and open space uses. Addendum to the Cit"f Tame W Santa Marianna Area Annera4on 2-12 ESA /208485.02 EIR January 2010,, 2. PmiKt Descdpgon 1 Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission 1. Approval of Sphere of Influence Expansion expanding the city of Temecula's sphere of influence to include that 4, l2G -acre portion of the 4,510 -acre SMAA outside of the City's current sphere of influence. 2. Approval of Annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,510 acres into the city of Temecula. 1 €€ I r E 1 is Addandumw he City of Temaula Santa MwgWaNaa A Lion 2 -13 ESA /208488.02 EIR Am8ry 2010 CHAPTER 3 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1 Prior Environmental Review and Discussion The certified FEIR for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation evaluated nine environmental factors, including air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, land use and planning, mineral resources, public services and utilities, transportation and traffic, noise and recreation. The FEIR also established mitigation measures to reduce the level of significant impacts. A mitigation monitoring program was adopted by the City in connection with certification of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. As previously described, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with certification of the 2008 FEIR. f ' To ensure consistency between this EIR Addendum, the 2008 FEIR, the same environmental topics will be evaluated. This section describes the existing setting and potential environmental impacts resulting with the proposed project, which is the amended annexation request. There has been no change in the existing setting since the time when the FEIR was prepared and certified last year. This discussion will be followed by evaluation of potential environmental impacts resulting with the proposed project. The analyses will focus on those environmental impacts that are specific to the currently proposed amended annexation request. 3. 1.1 Air Quality Existing Conditions The existing air quality setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Air quality impacts resulting from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.1 of the 2008 certified FEIR. Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request As previously described, the Applicant is now proposing to submit a revised annexation application to the Riverside Comity LAFCO that would remove approximately 487 acres of the 4,997 acres previously proposed in the September 22, 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR (certified December 9, 2008). The 487 acres not part of this amended project would include the area proposed for the Liberty Quarry Mine site and a few adjacent parcels from the previously certified FEIR project. In essence, the amended annexation request would reduce the component of potential development from 713 acres with a maximum of 81 new dwelling units and 263 Addendum to the City of Temecula Santa ih gwrita AreaAmexation 3 -1 ESA /206485.02 EIR January2010 I; 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ' estimated new residents, as proposed under the previous LAFCO application and evaluated by the certified FEIR, to approximately 225 acres with a maximum of 22 new dwelling units and 72 estimated new residents. The amended annexation request would result in a predominantly 73% (81 dwelling units reduced to 22 dwelling units = 59 dwelling units less or 73% dwelling units less) reduction in impacts as compared to the previous project evaluated by the certified FEIR. As such, implementation of the amended annexation request would result in the following impacts to i air quality: ESTIMATED DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Construction Year ROG NO, CO so, PM -10 PM -2.5 CO2 2010 13 92 46 >1 14 6 9,950 2011 12 85 45 >1 13 6 9,950 2012 12 79 44 >1 13 6 9 2013 11 74 43 >1 13 5 9,950 2014 11 60 37 >1 12 4 9,053 SCAQMD Daily Regional 75 100 550 150 150 55 NA Construction Thresholds Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No NA t Original Project 2 Construction Year 2010 9 92 47 >1 14 6 9,950 Original Project .' Construction year 2010 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 Minus Current Protect Construction Year 2010 NOTE: See Appendix A of the Air Quality Impact Analysis ( Appendix 9) for model output repod. NA is not available. SOURCE: ESA 2010 y f Evaluation of the above table indicates that daily worst -case emissions from construction of 22 dwelling units would not result in all exceedance of the SCAQMD regional air quality emissions' threshold due to construction activities, therefore the impact from emissions produced during project construction would be less than significant. However to further reduce construction emissions the following mitigation measure 3.1 -2a as detailed in the certified FEIR, would apply to the amended annexation request. n Addendum to the City of Temewla Santa Margarita Area Annexation 3.2 ESAl208485.02 EIR January 2010 I P 5 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ESTIMATED DAILY PROJECT OPERATION EMISSIONS (summer) Peak Daily Emissions (lb/day) j ActivitylYear ROG NO, CO SO PM-10 PM -2.5 CO2 SCAQMD Daily Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 NA Area source 1 <1 1 0 0 0 459 operational 2 2 21 >1 4 1 2,204 Total 3 2 22 >1 4 1 2,663 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No NA Original Project Total 11 10 81 >1 14 3 9,804 Original Project Total Minus current Project 8 8 59 0 10 2 7141 Total SOURCE: ESA, 2010 ESTIMATED DAILY PROJECT OPERATION EMISSIONS (winter) ' Peak Dally Emissions (lb/day) Activity/Year ROG NO c0 SOr PM -10 PM -2.5 CO2 SCAQMD Daily 55 55 550 150 150 55 NA Thresholds Area source 5 1 10 >1 1 1 876 operational 2 3 20 >1 4 1 1,997 Total 7 4 30 >1 5 2 2,873 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No NA Original Project Total 24 12 109 >1 19 8 10,577 Original Project Total Minus current Project 17 8 79 0 14 6 7,704 Tot SOURCE: ESA, 2010 No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected, and impacts would be lower than those studied in the Final EIR. Further evaluation is not necessary. C Mitigation Measures ` Mifigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional mitigation is required. 1 i MdeMum to the Car of TemeaM Santa MarWaa Nee Mnexatw 3 -3 ESA/ 209485.02 EIR ,lanuary 2010 3. Environmental Impacts antl Mitigation Measures ' Level of Significance after Mitigation A statement of overriding considerations was adopted as part of the FEIR for impacts that remained significant and unavoidable for air quality impacts. No other significant impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Implementation of these mitigation measures would lessen the project - specific and cumulative impacts of the proposed amended annexation request or reduce them to less than significant levels. 3.1.2 Biological Resources Existing Conditions i The existing biological resources setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Biological resource impacts resulting from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.2 of the 2008 certified FEIR. Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request Future development of approximately 225 acres with a maximum of 22 new dwelling units and 72 estimated new residents would have the potential to result in impacts to sensitive wildlife species found within the area. The potential impacts to biological resources associated with the amended annexation request would result in a 68% reduction in the area where impacts might occur as compared to the previously proposed annexation request, resulting in a substantially reduced potential for habitat impact. Potential impacts to these species would include an incremental loss of habitat (including breeding and/or seasonal foraging habitat). Individuals present within zones of project grading and other direct development impacts could potentially be killed or displaced by construction activities. The amended annexation request project site ties within the MSHCP. Because the sensitive plant and animal species located in the annexation area are MSHCP Covered Species the USFWS has determined that these species are adequately conserved through implementation of the MSHCP. (Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit No. TE088609 -0 dated June 22, 2004.) Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2 -1a as described in the certified FEIR would reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level. Some of the bird species that have been documented on site are protected under the federal MBTA and California Fish and Game Code which prohibits take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs (in particular raptor species). In order to avoid violation of the MBTA or the California Fish and Game Code, general guidelines suggest that project- related disturbances at active nesting territories be reduced or eliminated during the nesting cycle (generally February 1 to August 31). Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2 -1b will reduce these potential impacts to a less than significant level as described in the certified FEIR would reduce these ' potential impacts to a less than significant level. MOm = to the elry of Temecula Santa WTarilii aes Amaatloo 3 -4 ESAl2(IM55M !: EIR January 2010 3. Environmental Impacts and Miligatlon Measures ' The majority of the project area proposed for annexation will be designated "Open Space" and will remain undeveloped. The development potential on the remaining 225 acres which will be designated "Hillside Residential" is limited to I DU /10 AC which will permit a maximum of 22 new dwelling units to be built. As this development occurs, the loss of the portions of the project site as habitat will be an adverse, but not substantial impact on region -wide populations of these species. The amended annexation request's potential direct and indirect adverse impacts on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species would be reduced to below the level of significance through compliance with the provisions of the MSHCP and the implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.2 -1a and 3.2-lb as described in the certified FEIR. The vast majority of the riparian habitat within the annexation area occurs on the SMER, and is therefore conserved. Therefore the amended annexation project would not result in a substantial adverse impact to riparian habitats. The city of Temecula General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures that apply to potential future activities within the project site are incorporated by reference in Section 3.2 -6 of the certified FEIR. Development within the 225 -acre developable portion of the amended annexation area would add to the overall loss of CSS caused by development within wester Riverside County. Compliance with the MSHCP will mitigate these impacts to less than significant. Therefore, impacts to any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the CDFG or by the USFWS would be less than significant. ' The MSHCP identifies five geographic locations within the city and surrounding areas that contain potential regional wildlife corridor linkages, including French Valley, Lower Tucalota Creek, Temecula Creek, Pechanga Creek, and Murrieta Creek. Upon annexation, Santa Margarita River would then also be a potential regional wildlife corridor linkage within the city in addition to the previously identified five potential wildlife corridors. The amended annexation request would remove a substantial portion of the southeast comer of the project site which was previously (under the certified FEIR) located within a designated "Special Linkage Area." r Development within the now remaining developable area has the potential to impact wildlife corridors. The precise location of grading and dwelling units and driveways is speculative and therefore, the extent of the impact upon wildlife corridors cannot be determined. However, compliance with the MSHCP and the conditions of the Temecula General Plan Mitigation Measures outlined in Section 3.2.6 of the certified FEIR and relevant provisions of the proposed pre - zoning would reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Although most of the amended annexation request project site is located outside of criteria areas, the amended project would still be located in proximity to three subunits: Subunit 1 ( Murrieta Creek) to the north, Subunit 2 (Temecula and Pechanga Creeks) to the east and Subunit 6 (Santa Rosa Plateau) also to the north. The project site is primarily located outside of identified criteria areas. A small portion of the project site is located within Criteria Cell 7512 along the project's northern boundary. Because this area is already conserved as part of the SMER it is unlikely that development will occur in this portion of the criteria cell. The majority of the future projects ' within the project area would need to conform with the MSHCP requirements for non- criteria cell areas. Inn accordance with the MSHCP, proposed projects outside of the criteria area are to be Addendum to ero City of Temecula Santa Margariokea AAn tlon 3.5 ESA/20ad85.02 EIR Ja .WY2010 �. i' 3. Emironmental Impads and Mitigation Measures ' reviewed for consistency with the MSHCP Section 6.1.2 ( "Protection of Species Associated with Riparian/Riverine Areas and Venial Pool" guidelines), the Section 6.1.3 ( "Protection of Narrow Endemic Plant Species" guidelines), Section 6.1.4 ( "Guidelines Pertaining to the Urban/Wildlands Interface ") and the Section 6.3.2 ( "Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. "). The project site includes the Santa Margarita River and drainages tributary to the river. Although I most of the sensitive riparian /riverine portion of the annexation area is preserved as part of the SMER, approximately 225 acres of the proposed SMAA will retain the potential for development in accordance with general plan and zoning designations, which will allow development of approximately 22 new dwelling units. Future development within this area has the potential to impact riparian/riverine resources. However, potential impacts resulting from any future development of discretionary projects within the project area can be reduced to below the level of significance through compliance with the MSHCP and the Temecula General Plan EIR conditions listed in Section 3.2.6 of the certified FEIR. Additionally, through compliance with the mandatory provisions of the MSHCP and the listed mitigation measures, it can be determined that the amended annexation request project is consistent with MSHCP Section 6.1.2. The amended project site is not located within the Narrow Fndetnic Plant survey areas as shown t on Figure 6 -1 of the MSHCP [please refer to Figure 3.2 -5 of the September 22, 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FFIR certified December 9, 2008)]. Although most of the annexation area is preserved as part of the SMER, approximately 225 acres of the proposed SMAA project ' will retain the potential for development in accordance with general plan and zoning designations, which will allow development of approximately 22 new dwelling units. Development within this area has the potential to impact narrow endemic plant species at such time that development occurs. The precise location and extent of impact cannot be determined at this time. Additionally, the future location of narrow endemic plants cannot be determined at this time. Potential impacts resulting from any future development of discretionary projects within the project area can be reduced to below the level of significance through implementation of the listed mitigation r measures. Through compliance with the mandatory provisions of the MSHCP and the listed mitigation measures of the certified FEIR, potential impacts are reduced to below the level of significance and the project is consistent with MSHCP Section 6.1.3. Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP sets forth guidelines which are intended to address indirect effects associated with locating development in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area, where applicable. The guidelines referenced above have been incorporated by reference through General Plan EiR Mitigation Measure B -10 in Section 3.2.6 of the certified FEIR. The SMAA project site is primarily located outside of identified criteria areas. A small portion of the amended annexation request project site is located within Criteria Cell 7512 along the project's northern boundary; however, in comparison to the original project, the amended project site is not located within a designated "Special Linkage Area." The majority of the project site is located outside of designated criteria areas. The project site is located in proximity to three subunits: Subunit I (Murrieta Creek) to the north, Subunit 2 (Temecula and Pechanga Creeks) to Addendum b the CNyd Tem w Ste Narww Anw Amera8 3— 6 ESA 1208485.02 t EIR Janaary2010 l5. k? {i{; 3. Emimnmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ' the east and Subunit 6 (Santa Rosa Plateau) also to the north. Due to the project site's partial inclusion within an identified criteria cell, future development in the project area may need to comply with the policies set forth in Section 6.1.4. Although most of the annexation area is preserved as part of the SMER, approximately 225 acres of the proposed SMAA will retain the potential for development in accordance with general plan and zoning designations, which would allow development of approximately 22 new dwelling units. Development within this area has the potential to require compliance with the "Guidelines Pertaining to the Urban/Wildlands Interface" as described in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP, at such time that development requiring discretionary approval is proposed. Local policies and zoning include regulations to buffer the SMER from adverse effects of development, avoid interference with linkages for the species in the area, and preserve habitat for the common and sensitive species in the area. Through compliance with the mandatory provisions of the MSHCP and the listed mitigation measures, potential impacts are reduced to below the level of significance and the project is consistent with MSHCP Section 6.1.4. The amended annexation request project site is located outside of any Critical Area Species Survey Area ( CASSA) for plants and mammals, although one CASSA plant species, the thread - leaved brodiaea ( Brodiaea ftlifolia) has been observed within the project boundaries. The southeast portion of the project site under the certified FEIR was located within the area shown ' on MSHCP Figure 6 -4 (Burrowing Owl Survey). This area is no longer included as part of the amended annexation request; as such, the potential for impacts to burrowing owl habitat would be greatly decreased. The precise location of development and whether or not a development site contains occupied burrowing owl habitat cannot be determined at this time. Additionally, due to the migratory nature of the burrowing owl, there is a possibility that although burrowing owls may not be located on a particular property at any point in time, they could occupy the site prior to actual project construction. Development of future discretionary development proposals within this area may require compliance with MSHCP Section 6.3.2 through the preparation of burrowing owl habitat assessments and focused burrowing owl surveys, and compliance with the listed mitigation measures for projects that occur on the portions of the projects site where burrowing owl assessments are required. The amended annexation request would still have the potential to have a significant impact associated with burrowing owl habitat. However with the implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2 -5a and Mitigation Measure 3.2 -5b (from the certified FEIR) the project impacts would be below a level of significance. Based upon the above analysis of consistency with the MSHCP, and implementation of the listed mitigation measures, the proposed project is consistent with the provisions of the adopted MSHCP. For these reasons the proposed project will not conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or state conservation plan. No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected. Further evaluation is not ' necessary. Addendum to the City of Temaala Sanla Margarita Area AmexaBOn 3 -7 ESA /108485.02 EIR January2010 3. Eovlronmental Imwcla onl Miliolon Measures ' Mitigation Measures I Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FFIR remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No new mitigation is required. Level of Significance after Mitigation No significant impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Implementation of these mitigation measures would adequately ensure that project - specific and cumulative impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be reduced to less than significant levels. 3.1.3 Cultural Resources Existing Conditions The existing cultural resources setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Cultural resource impacts resulting from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.3 of the 2008 certified FEIR. Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request ' Impacts to cultural resources caused by the amended project were identified and recommended mitigation measures as identified in the certified FEIR were developed to avoid or minimize identified impacts to cultural resources. Please refer to the certified FEIR for a summary of cultural resource impacts and mitigation measures. Any future development within the project area could result in the adverse impact to cultural resouroes- Implementation of Mitigation Measures as detailed in the certified FEIR (Section 3.3) would minimize this impact to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional mitigation is required. Level of Significance after Mitigation No significant impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Implementation of these mitigation i measures would adequately ensure that project - specific and cumulative impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be reduced to less than significant levels. A ftm N IM GN d Temeala Santa Margarita kea AmwUw 3-8 ESA 20a485.02 EIR Jamlary2g10 {` 3. Envlronmernal Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1.4 Land Use and Planning Existing Conditions The existing land use and planning setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Land Use and Planning impacts resulting from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.4 of the 2008 certified FEIR. Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request The amended SMAA is relatively consistent with the land use designations and policies of the Riverside County General Plan and the Southwest Area Plan. Although the amended project proposes to change the existing County land use designations of the project site from OS -HC and RM to OS and HR land use designations, the allowable uses are comparable with one another and both sets of uses can currently be found in the area around the project site within Riverside County, the City, and San Diego County. All of the surrounding properties to the north and west in unincorporated Riverside County have a General Plan designation of RM. To the east of the project site, the County of Riverside designations are primarily OS -C and RM, with a small amount of "Light Industial" and "Medium High Density Residential" along the east side of 1 -15. To the east of the project site, the City of Temecula General Plan land use designations are ' primarily HR and OS, with a small amount of "High Density Residential" and "Neighborhood Commercial" located east of 1 -15. South of the project site, in San Diego County the general plan land use designations are primarily "Multiple Rural Use" with some "Public/Semi- Public Lands" I and "Impact Sensitive" designated property. E The consistency of the proposed project with the policies of the Riverside County General Platt and with the policies of the City of Temecula General Plan are described in Table 3.4 -3, City of Temecula General Plan: Land Use Policies and Table 3.4-4, Riverside County General Plan, Land Use Policies and Southwest Area Plan Policies. The amended SMAA can be viewed as being consistent with most of the relevant policies of both the City's General Plan and the County's General Plan. As part of the amended project, the project area will be pre - zoned, with zoning designations consistent with the City's chosen General Plan land use designations of OS and HR. This means that areas designated OS will be pre -zoned OS -C -SM and areas designed HR will be pre -zoned HR -SM by the City. Relevant provisions of the proposed HR -SM pre - zoning require any hillside development plan to be designed to protect sensitive wildlife habitat areas, biological corridors, native plants, and plant communities. The HR -SM zone supports interconnected, contiguous, and u integrated open space systems within an area, particularly when located contiguous to open space preserves as well as containing grading limitations, ridgeline protections and standards to reduce green house gas emissions. The purpose and intent of the development standards under the proposed HR -SM zone are to protect the value of the community and the subject property of ridgelines, prominent landfonns, rock outcroppings, open space areas, hydrologic features, ' wildlife communities, unique and sensitive habitat and vegetation communities, and other natural, AddmB W the OtYdTemewla Santa Maryanta Area Amreaallm 3 -9 ESA /208485.07 EIR January7010 i! 3. EmimnmenW1 Impacts ano Mitigation Measures ' biological, slid scenic resources. In addition, it is the intent of development and design under the proposed HR -SM zone to preserve and enhance the visual and aesthetic quality of hillsides from the surrounding community as well as promote and encourage a variety of high quality, alternative architectural and energy efficient development designs and concepts appropriate for hillside areas by utilizing the highest quality of prescribed standards. Lastly, the proposed HR- SM zone is intended to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare and specifically protect the public and property from hazards such as seismic, geologic, and fire. In the General Plan Analysis, the County's RM land use designation and the City's HR land use designation define the same level of residential use intensity in an area of steep slopes that impose development constraints and limit land use activities to 1 DU /10 AC with ancillary uses. However, the majority of the amended project area is zoned R -R with a small area zoned R -A -20 by Riverside County. Based on Riverside County's Land Use Designations — Zoning Consistency Guidelines, the R -R zoning is considered to be "conditionally consistent" with the county's RM land use designation and "inconsistent" with the county's OS -CH designation. R -A -20 zoning is considered "inconsistent" with the county's OS -CH designation. Therefore, current Riverside County zoning for most of the project area is inconsistent with County's current land use designations. Under the City's proposed HR zoning classification and the county's current R -R and R -A -20 zoning designations, there are a range of allowed use. While the residential uses under both jurisdictions are about the same, the county's additional range of land use activities under R -R and R -A -20 classifications, as set forth in Ordinance No. 348, include numerous permitted or conditionally permitted commercial or business uses. However, the County's range of permitted or conditionally permitted land uses in the R -R and R -A -20 zoning classifications include uses i that are not described in the range of uses defined in the Riverside County General Plan's t description for the RM land use designation, which is set forth above. Additionally, both of these county zoning classifications contain uses which are not consistent with the land use limitations imposed by the County's General Plan within the OS -HC designation. By comparison, the City's proposed OS -C -SM zoning is comparable and consistent with the County's OS -HC land use designation with the intent of conserving open space in a natural state for the betterment and enjoyment of the community through preservation with opportunities for limited recreational use. The City's choice of HR -SM zoning permits single- family residential use which is consistent with the single- family residential use permitted in the county's RM land use designation. Although, the City's list of permitted uses may preclude a number of uses permitted or conditionally permitted under the County zoning, the City's proposed zoning will permit the use of the subject property in a manner consistent with the current and proposed land use designations (some incompatible uses the County's R -R zone currently allows include, laundries, machine shops, oil refineries, and radio broadcast studies). Those uses lost, such as surface mining, are uses that are likely to conflict with the existing and planned "rural residential" and "habitat conservation" uses identified for these properties. The City's HR designation does allow a number of uses other than residential (i.e. churches, educational facilities, libraries, day ' care centers, bed and breakfast establishments). Addendum to the City of Teme4uta Santa Wri; iM Mac Amaaaton 3-10 ESA 1208485.02 EIR January2010 3. ErrAwmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Although there are inconsistencies between the County's general plan designations and zoning, the City's proposed general plan designations and pre - zoning are generally consistent with the County's general plan, and thus would not constitute a significant change in land use. Further, the amended project site's existing land uses consist of natural open space over the vast majority of the area, most of which is in the SMER, and six single- family homes with some agricultural and equestrian activities. The City's proposed general plan designations and pre- zoning would generally preserve the existing land uses, and the introduction of low density residential development that might occur pursuant to the proposed land use regime would not constitute a significant change from the existing conditions. Finally, although mining may be a conditionally permitted use in parts of the proposed annexation area under the County regulations, mining would represent a significant change in land use from the open space and rural residential land uses that presently exist and that constitute the baseline condition. A change in land use from existing uses to mining would be inconsistent with policies designed to protect the environment and the character of rural mountainous areas, including the SMER and County policies, including but not limited to: • OS 20.1 Preserve and maintain open space that protects County environmental resources and maximizes public health and safety in areas where significant environmental hazards and resources exist. ' • OS 20.2 Prevent unnecessary extension of public facilities, services, and utilities, for urban uses, into Open Space - Conservation designated areas. And the following policies which apply to properties designated with the Rural Mountainous land use designation on the area plan land use maps. • LU 17.1 Require that grading be designed to blend with undeveloped natural contours of the site and avoid an unvaried, unnatural, or manufactured appearance. • LU 17.3 Ensure that development does not adversely impact the open space and rural character of the surrounding area. The proposed City land use regulations would not allow mining, therefore eliminating any potential land use impacts that would result from mining. Although disallowing mining would result in a significant impact to mineral resources, as discussed in Section 3.5 of the certified EIR, it would not result in a significant land use impact. For the above described reasons, the project will have less than significant impacts related to land use and zoning without any further need for mitigation, regulatory compliance, or design considerations. Changing the existing Riverside Comity Land Use designations of OS -CH and RM to City land use designations of OS -CH and HR are considered compatible changes with minimal overall differences and would have few impacts relevant to the general plan and zoning consistency requirements. Therefore the land use and planning issues related to the SMAA have been determined to be less than significant and no mitigation is necessary. MCeMUm to the city of Tent"Wo Santa Margarita Area Mnawbw 3 -11 ESA/209455.02 EIR Iaowg20I0 3. EiAmmenfal Impacts and MXlgetion Maasurea 1 No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected. Further evaluation is not � necessary. Mitigation Measures Mitigation was not required for Land Use and Planning impacts as determined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR; as such, no additional mitigation is required. Level of Significance after Mitigation No significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation was not required for Land Use and Planning impacts as determined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Project - specific and cumulative Land Use and Planning impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be less than those identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Therefore, Land Use and Planning impacts, as a result of the proposed amended annexation request, would be to less than significant. 3.1.5 Mineral Resources Existing Conditions ' The existing mineral resources setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Mineral resource impacts resulting from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.5 of the 2008 certified FEIR. Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request j t The amended project area is located within an area that until recently was classified as an MRZ-3 area, indicating that the significance of mineral deposits are undetermined from available data. The portion of the proposed project site as outlined in the certified FEIR that contained the 155 acre Liberty Quarry site (which is now classified MRZ -2a) has been removed as part of the amended annexation request. The remaining area, which is the amended annexation request portion, is still classified M117-3. Therefore, it is undetermined whether the amended annexation request area would result in zoning and general plan land use designations that would prohibit mining of a known aggregate resource located within the amended project area that could result in the loss of known mineral resources within the project area that would be of value to the region. Although the amended annexation request area would be clearly less impactful as compared to the project outlined in the certified FEIR, there would still be a restriction from the potential of exploiting aggregate resources because this area is still classified as MRZ -3. Therefore, the adopted statement of overriding considerations as part of the FEIR for impacts that i remain significant and unavoidable to mineral resources would still apply under the amended annexation request. Addendum to Ne City of Temecula Sonia Mmganta Area Annexation 3-12 ESA 1208685, 02 EIR January 2010 4i 3. Envirmmontal Into t and Mitigation Measures ' Mitigation Measures As previously described, the City's General Plan and the County of Riverside's General Plan do not identify any locally important mineral resource recovery sites within the amended SMAA as determined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. The amended annexation request will not result in the loss of availability of locally - important mineral resource recovery sites delineated on a General Plan, specific plan or other land use plan. Therefore, mitigation was not required for the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan. As previously stated, the portion of the proposed project site as outlined in the certified FOR that contained the 155 acre Liberty Quarry site (which is now classified MRZ -2a) has been removed as part of the amended annexation request. The remaining amended annexation request area is still classified MRZ -3; therefore, it is undetermined whether the amended annexation request area would result in zoning and general plan land use designations that would prohibit mining of a known aggregate resource located within the amended project area that could result in the loss of known mineral resources within the project area that would be of value to the region. Although the amended annexation request area would be clearly less impactful as compared to the project outlined in the certified FEIR, there would still be a restriction from the potential of exploiting aggregate resources because this area is still classified as MRZ -3. Therefore, the adopted statement of overriding considerations as part of the FEIR for impacts that remain significant and unavoidable to mineral resources would still apply under the amended annexation request. I Level of Significance after Mitigation No significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation was not required for Mineral Resource impacts as detenmined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Project - specific and cumulative Mineral Resource impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be less than those identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. However, as previously described although the amended annexation request area would be clearly less impactful as compared to the project outlined in the certified FEIR, there would still be a restriction from the potential of exploiting aggregate resources because this area is still classified as MRZ -3. Therefore, the adopted statement of overriding considerations as part of the FEIR for impacts that remain significant and unavoidable to mineral resources would still apply under the amended annexation request. 3.1.6 Public Services and Utilities Existing Conditions The existing public services and utilities setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Public services and utilities impacts resulting from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.6 of the 2008 certified FEIR. Addendum to We city of remecula Santa MaWdta Area Annexation 3-13 ESA /208485.02 EIR January 2010 ]. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ' Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request With the limited potential for additional dwelling units and compliance with city and state building codes and the city's established development review, and building permit procedures, the amended annexation request would not require a substantial change in existing public services and utilities services provided within the project area. Therefore, the amended annexation request not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental services and would not create the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire services. Impacts associated with the amended annexation request would result in a 73% (81 dwelling units reduced to 22 dwelling units = 59 dwelling units less or 73% dwelling units less) reduction in impacts to public services as compared to the originally proposed annexation request. Impacts to public services and utilities associated with the previous annexation request were determined to be less than significant and the public services and utilities impacts associated with the amended annexation request would therefore be less than significant. The amended project area is almost entirely vacant land with the potential to permit approximately 22 single - family dwelling units. Temecula General Plan Policy GM /PFE 3.1 requires that development does not exceed the ability to adequately provide supporting police services and to ensure an adequate response time for emergencies and to strive to provide one ' full -time officer per 1,000 residents for police (sheriff) protection services. If the project area was built to its maximum capacity, the result would be an estimated additional 72 persons living within the project area. With the limited increase in population growth and the current staffing levels, impacts to the police protection services would be less than significant. Therefore, the amended project will not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities and will not create the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection services. A portion of the amended project site currently within the City's sphere of influence is located within the boundaries of the Temecula Valley Unified School District. The balance of the project site is located within the Murrieta Valley Unified School District's boundaries. There is the potential for development of additional residential dwellings (22 dwellings). Due to the limited number of residences that will be constructed within the project area, the proposed project will contribute a limited number of additional students to the district. However, residential development is required to pay a school impact fee which is designated to offset the cost of constructing new schools. Therefore, potential impacts to schools are considered to be less than i! significant. The proposed amended project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered school facilities, or the need for new or physically altered school facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for school services. Addandum to the city ot TM a Santa Matgadta Area Annamflion 3 -14 ESA /20848502 EIR Janwary2010 �' 3. Environmental Impacts and MB pWn Measures 1 The basic park acreage standard for the City is 5.0 acres of usable City -owned parkland per 1,000 residents. Since the project area could be developed with approximately 22 single - family homes there would be a minor impact on park facilities. Based on the highest estimated population calculation, there could be 72 additional people living within the project area. With the payment of the required fees, development within the project area would provide the necessary funding for use in expanding the existing parks system. The payment of these mandatory regulatory fees would offset the proposed project's impacts to park facilities and therefore the project would have less than significant impacts to parks services. The project site is served by existing libraries within the Riverside County Library System, which operates two libraries within the City. The project area with the possibility for development of approximately 22 additional single - family dwellings and a projected population of 72 people would create an incremental demand for library services. Due to the small increase in potential demand for library services, the project will have a less than significant impact upon library facilities. Future development in the amended project area would have to rely on water from private wells and will not impact the existing entitlements of RCWD. As discussed above, homes served by wells will need to put in a tank system that meets the City's fire -flow requirements. Therefore, this project site is considered to have no impacts to available water supplies. The amended project ! site is within the service area of EMWD however, the remoteness and the topographical constraints limit the serviceability of the area to current public wastewater facilities. Therefore, development in the area will have to rely on septic systems for wastewater discharge. Since no new service will be added to EMWD existing facilities there will be no need for construction of new or expansion of existing wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, the amended project is considered to have no impact to available wastewater treatment capacity. Although the amended project area is under the jurisdiction of EMWD, wastewater treatment I service is not provided into the project area. Existing properties rely on septic systems for wastewater as will future development in the project area. Since no new service will be added from expected development in the annexation area, the proposed project will not affect the capacity of EMWD's existing facilities. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated that would affect the wastewater treatment provider's current capacity or existing service commitments. Given the limited contribution of construction - related solid waste anticipated to be generated by the amended annexation request project when construction occurs, development of the project site would not substantially contribute to the exceedance of the permitted capacity of the designated landfills. Less than significant impacts to the existing landfills are expected. Given the limited contribution of solid waste anticipated to be generated from the project area, future development in the project area will not substantially contribute to the exceedance of the permitted capacity of the designated landfills. The amended project area is primarily undeveloped and all storm waters within the area drain to the Santa Margarita River. This area is managed by Riverside County Flood Control and Water ' Conservation District; however, they have no existing facilities in the amended project area. It is Mdv um to lSt Oty of Ta W Santa MrgMW Amt Ame tan 3.15 ESA/20 85.02 EIR January 2010 i. i_ r- 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Mwwms not likely that extensive drainage systems will be installed or necessary in the area due to the topography and the limited development intensity of the land use designations. Storm water /surface water in the area is currently discharged into the existing watershed area. As future development occurs construction plans would be assessed for anticipated storm water run -off and appropriate containment methods will be implemented to limit off -site impacts or the need for off -site drainage facilities. Storm water drainage on -site would not require the expansion of County Flood Control, nor require new facilities, and potential impacts to storm water drainage facilities are considered to be less than significant. Future development in the amended project area will use existing electricity service provided by Southern California Edison. Some extension of service may be necessary into undeveloped areas and will require assessment at the time of development review. Based on the current availability of electrical service in portions of the project area, extensive infrastructure is not necessary and the project would not significantly affect electrical services. The amended project area is not currently served by Southern California Gas Company natural gas service. Therefore development in the project area would be required to install propane systems to meet their service needs, without adversely affecting the existing natural gas system. i Therefore, future development in the project area would not affect the current service provider or € natural gas services. € ' Future development in the amended project area would use existing service provided by Verizon. Some extension of service may be necessary into primarily undeveloped areas and will require assessment at the time of development review. Based on the current availability of communication service in portions of the project area, extensive infrastructure is not necessary and the project will not create a significant impact in communications services. No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected. Further evaluation is not necessary. k' Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional mitigation is required. Level of Significance after Mitigation N No significant impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Implementation of these mitigation measures would adequately ensure that project - specific and cumulative impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be reduced to less than significant levels. 1 moenwm to mo city of Temewa Serra Margarita Nea mneation 3 -16 ESA /208185.02 OR January 2010 'y i 3. Envlronmentai Impacts and Mitigation Measures 3.1.7 Transportation and Traffic Existing Conditions The existing transportation and traffic setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Transportation and traffic impacts resulting from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.7 of the 2008 certified FEIR. Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request The traffic analysis under the certified FEIR noted that intersections and roadway segments within the study area would operate at a deficient LOS including locations within the city of Temecula, Riverside County, and San Diego County. Impacts to these intersections and roadways segments would be reduced by approximately 73% (81 dwelling units reduced to 22 dwelling units = 59 dwelling units less or 73% dwelling units less) under the amended annexation request, as the revised project could develop up to 22 new dwelling units as compared to 81 under the certified FEIR. Within the study area, impacts were noted at the following intersections or roadway segments: e 1 -15 Southbound Ramps /Rainbow Valley West Blvd intersection e 1 -15 (Riverside County) from County boundary to Temecula Pkwy N roadway segment e Rainbow Canyon Road roadway segment The traffic analysis of the certified FEIR concluded that there were feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the impact at the intersection of I -15 Southbound Ramps /Rainbow Valley West Blvd. j This mitigation measure would require the installation of an all -way stop at this location. However, as this intersection is outside of the jurisdiction of the city of Temecula, the city of Temecula can not guarantee that this mitigation would be implemented in a timely fashion and the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. However, there are no feasible mitigation measures for any project impacts related to 1 -15 for those segments within Riverside County. Even if there were feasible mitigation measures, implementing any mitigation measures by the city of Temecula would require the concurrence of outside agencies such as Riverside County and Caltrans. Since there are no feasible mitigation measures and improvements to the freeway are outside of thejurisdiction of the city of Temecula, the impacts to 1 -15 within Riverside County remain significant and unavoidable. The traffic analysis in the certified FEIR also concluded that there is a feasible improvement that would mitigate the project impact along Rainbow Canyon Road. This improvement would entail the widening of the roadway, which is anticipated by the Riverside County General Plan. However, our review of available documentation indicates that this project is not included in the regional traffic fee project (TUMF) and no funding has been allocated for this project at this time. Additionally, this improvement is outside of the city of Temecula and the City would be unable to ' assure its completion. Therefore, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. Md nn to to City of Temecula Santa Margarita Mee Annexation 3 -17 ESA /20848502 EIR January2010 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional feasible mitigation is available. Level of Significance after Mitigation A statement of overriding considerations was adopted as part of the FEIR for impacts that remain significant and unavoidable. No other significant impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR, and the considerable reduced level of impacts associated with the reduced size of the proposed annexation area. Implementation of these mitigation measures would lessen project - specific and cumulative impacts of the proposed amended annexation request. 3.1.8 Noise Existing Conditions The existing noise setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Noise impacts resulting from implementation of the originally ! proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.8 of the 2008 certified FEIR. ' Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request As previously described, the Applicant is now proposing to submit a revised annexation application to the Riverside County LAFCO to exclude 487 acres of the 4,997 acres previously proposed in the certified Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. The 487 acres not part of this amended project would include the area proposed for the Liberty Quarry Mine site and a few adjacent parcels from the previously certified FEIR project. In essence, the amended annexation request would reduce the component of potential development from 713 acres with a maximum of 81 new dwelling units and 263 estimated new residents, as proposed under the previous LAFCO application and evaluated by the certified FEIR, to 225 acres with a maximum of 22 new dwelling units and 72 estimated new residents. The amended annexation request would essentially result in a 73% (81 dwelling units reduced to 22 dwelling units = 59 dwelling units less or 73% dwelling units less) reduction in impacts, as compared to the previous annexation request, evaluated by the certified FEIR. As such, implementation of the amended annexation request would result in the following noise impacts as summarized in the tables on the following pages. MdeMUm b Ore City W TenwHla Santa Miagnrlla Area AenexadW 3 -18 ESA /208485.02 EIR January 2010 _ 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ' EXISTING PM PEAK -HOUR NOISE LEVELS I ALONG SELECTED ROADWAYS I Weekday Noise Levels (Leq)a Modeled Roadway Incremental Significant Segment Existing Existing +Project Increaser' (Yes/Nor La Paz St north of 60 60 0 No Temecula Pkwy La Paz St south of 50 51 1 No Temecula Pkwy Temecula Pkwy 68 68 0 No east of La Paz St Temecula Pkwy 67 67 0 No west of La Paz St Pechanga Pkwy south of Temecula 66 66 0 No Pkwy Temecula Pkwy east of Pechanga 66 66 0 No Pkwy Temecula Pkwy west of Pechanga 68 68 0 No Pkwy ' Rainbow Canyon Rd south of 60 80 0 No Pechanga Pkwy Pechanga Pkwy east of Rainbow 65 65 0 No Canyon Rd Pechanga Pkwy south of Rainbow 65 65 0 No 1 Canyon Rd a Noise levels are estimated at a distance of W feet from roadway centerline. Data based on weekday peak hour Lee Is approximately equal to the Ldn under normal traffic conditions (Cakmns, 1996(, model was ran using a 73% decrease of traffic on each segment. is The numbers from exlsong were subtracted from existing plus project to show the Incremental increase. c Considered significant if the incremental increase In noise is greater than 5 d5A Lee in a noise environment of 60 dBA Ldn or less, an increase of 3 dBA Leq In a noise environment greater than 60 dBA and 65 dBA Lot. of an Increase of 1.5 dBA Leq in a noise environment greater than 65 dBA Ldn. SOURCE: Fher afd Peers, 2008; ESA. 2010. t ( f- Addendam to the City of Terecma Sane Mxgarits Ara, Arvwxiion 3 ESA /20WS02 EIR January 2010 ti j 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1 FUTURE PM PEAK -HOUR NOISE LEVELS ALONG SELECTED ROADWAYS Weekday Noise Levels (Leq)a Existing + Modeled Roadway Existing+ Ambient Growth+ Incremental Significant Segment AmbientGrowth Project Increase (Yes/No)' ! La Paz St north of 60 60 0 No Temecula Pkwy La Paz St south of 50 50 0 No Temecula Pkwy Temecula Pkwy 68 68 0 No east of La Paz St Temecula Pkwy 67 67 0 No west of La Paz St Pechanga Pkwy south of Temecula 66 66 0 No Pkwy Temecula Pkwy east of Pechanga 66 66 0 No Pkwy Temecula Pkwy west of Pechangs 68 68 0 No Pkwy ' Rainbow Canyon Rd south of 80 60 0 No Pechanga Pkwy Pechanga Pkwy east of Rainbow 66 66 0 No Canyon Rd Pechanga Pkwy south of Rainbow 66 66 0 No Canyon Rd F a Noise levels are estimated at a distance of 50 feet from roadway centerline. Data based on weekday peak tour Leq is approximalely ) equal to the Ldn under normal traffic conditions (Csitrans, 1998), model was run using a 73% decrease of traffic on each segment. b The numbers from existing plus ambient growth were subtracted from existing plus ambient growth plus project to show the incremental Increase. c Considered significant if the incremental increase in noise Is greater than 5 dBA Leq in a noise environment of 60 dBA Ldn or less, an Increase of 3 dBA Leq In a noise environment greater than 60 dBA and 65 dBA Ldn, or an increase of 1.5 dBA Leq in a miss environment greater than 65 dBA Ldn. SOURCE: Fehr and Peens, 2008: ESA, 2010. g 3 E F AldaM= to the City of Ternewla Santa Marganla Nea Annexation 3.20 ESA 1208485.02 EIR . nuary201q 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures CUMULATIVE FUTURE PM PEAK -HOUR NOISE LEVELS ALONG SELECTED ROADWAYS Weekday Noise Levels (Leq)a Modeled Roadway Existing +Ambient Growth Existing+ Ambient Growth+ Incremental Significant Segment + Cumulative Projects Cumulative Projects + Project Increase" (Yes/Nof I La Paz St north of 62 62 0 No Temecula Pkwy La Paz St south of 50 50 0 No Temecula Pkwy Temecula Pkwy 70 70 0 No east of La Paz St Temecula Pkwy 70 70 0 No west of La Paz St Pechanga Pkwy south of Temecula 69 69 0 No Pkwy Temecula Pkwy east of Pechanga 69 69 0 No Pkwy Temecula Pkwy west of Pechanga 71 71 0 No Pkwy Rainbow Canyon Rd south of 63 63 0 No Pechanga Pkwy f Pechanga Pkwy east of Rainbow 68 68 0 No ' Canyon Pechanga Pkwy south of Rainbow 69 69 0 No Canyon Rd a Noise levels are estimated at a distance of 50 feet from roadway centerline. Data based on weekday peak hour Leq is approximately equal to the Ldn under normal traffic conditions (Caltrans, 1998), model was run using a 73% decrease of traffic on each segment. b The numbers from existing plus ambient growth plus cumulative projects were subtracted from existing plus ambient growth plus cumulative projects plus project to show the incremental Increase. c Considered er slgA Le t lithe incremental Increase in h is greater than 5 dBA Leq In a noise environment Le den Ldn or less, an increase of 3 dBq In a noise environment greater r than 80 dBA and 05 dBA Ldn, or an increase of 1.5 dBA A Leq in a raise environment greaa Le ter then 85 dBA IAn. SOURCE: Fehr and Peers, 2008; ESA, 2010. No significant project - specific impacts are expected. Mitigation Measures Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional mitigation is a required. , a Level of Significance after Mitigation i' A statement of overriding considerations was adopted as part of the FEIR for impacts that remain significant and unavoidable. No other significant project - specific impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Addendum to the City of Teme la Sams Margarita Area Aonexw 3-21 ESA /208985.02 EIR Aanuan,2010 I 3. Environmental Impede and Mitigation Measures Annexation FEIR Implementation of these mitigation measures would adequately ensure that project - specific and impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be reduced to less than significant levels. The amended annexation request would reduce the component of potential development from 713 acres with a maximum of 81 new dwelling units and 263 estimated new residents, as proposed under the previous LAFCO application and evaluated by the certified FEIR, to 225 acres with a maximum of 22 new dwelling units and 72 estimated new residents. The amended annexation request would essentially result in a 73% (81 dwelling units reduced to 22 dwelling units = 59 dwelling units less or 73% dwelling units less) reduction in impacts, as compared to the previous annexation request, evaluated by the certified FEIR. A 73% reduction in the amount of dwelling units would result in a reduced amount of noise from a reduced amount of vehicle trips and reduced amount of temporary noise impacts from construction. 3.1.9 Recreation Existing Conditions The existing recreation setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Recreation impacts resulting from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.9 of the 2008 certified FEIR. ' Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request Based on the City's standard single - family occupancy rate of 3.24 persons per home the project area could become home to approximately 72 additional residents. Through the payment of m- lieu fees, dedication of parks, and the joint use of school facilities, the City anticipates having sufficient parkland to meet the needs of the City residents through year 2013; as such, the I increase in projected residents as part of the amended annexation request, should optimal development occur, would be considered negligible. Therefore, the amended project would not result in an increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. Through the payment of in -lieu fees, dedication of parks, and thejoint use of school facilities, the City anticipates having sufficient parkland to meet the needs of the City residents through year 2013. Therefore, the 73 % reduction in potential new dwelling units under the amended project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Project impacts on the environment will be less than significant. No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected. Further evaluation is not necessary. Mdendum to the atyol TemecvM Santa MMrgota kea Mnwfion 3 -22 ESA 12084&5.02 EIR January 2010 l 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1 Mitigation Measures Mitigation was not required for Recreation impacts as determined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR; as such, no additional mitigation is required. Level of Significance after Mitigation No significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation was not required for Recreation impacts as determined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Project - specific and cumulative Recreation impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be less than those identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Therefore, Recreation impacts, as a result of the proposed amended annexation request, would be to less than significant. 1 1 Addeadurn W M City of Temecula Santa Margadu Area Annaration 3-23 ESA 1208485.02 EIR Jaewary 2010 n I• } CHAPTER 4 Findings In accordance with Section 15090 of the CEQA Guidelines, the following findings are made: t 1. The Addendum is the appropriate environmental clearance document to evaluate the t Addendum to the Santa Margarita Area Annexation because the minor changes proposed will not result in any new significant adverse environmental impacts which were not already reviewed, analyzed, and/or mitigated in the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR (SCH No. 2007041085), City of Temecula, September 22, 2008 (certified December 9, 2008). 2. It is the independent judgment of the Lead Agency that the Addendum includes updated data and evaluations associated with the proposed project and that the findings and conclusions from the Addendum will be considered by the Lead Agency prior to acting on the project. 3. The Lead Agency finds that the proposed project is not a new project, and does not change 1 the nature and scope of the project evaluated in the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR (SCI{ No. 2007041085), City of Temecula, September 22, 2008 (certified December 9, 2008). There have been no substantial changes in the project requiring major revisions to the previous documents, because any impacts of the prior project are reduced under the amended project now under consideration. t 4. The Lead Agency finds that the Addendum has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in t accordance with requirements presented in Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, and is complete and adequate in its evaluation of all environmental effects of the amended annexation request. The amended annexation request will not result in any additional significant, more severe, and/or unavoidable impacts that were not evaluated in the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FOR (SCH No. 2007041085), City of Temecula, September 22, 2008 (certified December 9, 2008). i Add-" 101110 City W To.e W Same Mwg,11a Area m" .U. 4 -1 � EIR ESA /208!85.02 January 2010 S CHAPTER 5 Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations 5.1 Documents Consulted The following documents were referred to as general information sources during preparation of this document. They are available for public review at the locations noted. Some of these documents are also available at public libraries and at other public agency offices. Albert A. Webb Associates. 2008. Santa Margarita Area Annexation, Planning Application PA07- 02225, Planning Application PA07 -0226, Environmental Impact Report EA -128 (SCH No. 2007041085). Prepared for the City of Temecula. Bean, L.J., and F.C. Shipek. 1978. "Luiserio in California" in the flandbook of North American ' Indians, Vol. 8. W. C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian htstitution: Washington, D.C. California Air Resources Board, AB 32 Fact Sheet and Timeline -- California Global Warming Solutions Act of2006, September 25, 2006. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at http://www.arb.ca.aov/cc/facts/facts.litm) California Chapter of the Association of Environmental Professionals, Alternative Approaches to Analyze Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Global Climate Change in CEQA Documents, Final, June 29, 2007. (Available at on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at www.califaeo.ore) California Climate Action Registry, General Reporting Protocol, Version 2.2 March 2007. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at http: / /www.climateregistry.orJ Default.asnx7Tabl D= 3347 &refreshed= true) %20) California Department of Conservation, Aggregate Availability In California, Map Sheet 52 (updated 2006), 2006. (Available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department and on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at littp: / /www.consrv.ca.eov /CGS/ information /publications/ins/MS 52 map. pd California Department of Conservation, California Surface Mining and Reclamation Policies and t Procedures, Guidelinesfor Classification and Designation ofMineral Lands, 2000. (Available for review on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at http://www.coiisrv.ca.gov/SMGB/G`uidelines/ClassDesig.t)d ' b eMum to Na City d TamaMa S W Mar0aM1 Area Am xse 5-1 ESA/ 208485.02 EIR January 2010 yy f 6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and Anonyms and Abbreviations ' California Department of Conservation, Mineral Land Classification of the Granite Construction Company Liberty Quarry Site, Temecula, Riverside County, California -For Portland Cement Concrete -Grade Aggregate. Special Report 200, 2007. (Available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department.) California Department of Conservation, Mineral Land Classification of The Temescal Valley Area, Riverside County, Special Report 165, 1991'. (Available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department.) California Department of Conservation, Update of Mineral Land Classification: Aggregate Materials in the Western San Diego County Production- Consumption Region, 1996. (Available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department.) California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), 2008. California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). Wildlife Habitat Data Analysis Branch, Habitat Conservation Division, CDFG, Sacramento, CA. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Technical Noise Supplement, 1998. California Energy Commission, Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 to 2004, Publication CEC -600- 2006 - 013 -SF, December 2006. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at lute:// www .energy.e.t.gov /2006publications /CEC -600- 2006- 013 /CF.0 -600- 2006 - 013- SF.PDF California Energy Commission, Our Changing Climate, Publication CEC -500 -2006 -077, July 2006. (Available on the Internet on November 20, 2007 at http: // www. eiierjzy .ca.aov /2006publicatioiis/CE-C -500 -2006- 077 /CEC -500- 2006 -077 PDFI California Energy Commission, Scenarios of Climate Change in California: An Overview, j Publication CEC -500- 2005- 186 -SF, Published December 2005. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at http:// www. energy .ca.Lov /20051)ublications /CFC -500 -2005- 186 /CEC -500- 2005 - 186 -SF. PDF) California Executive Department, Executive Order S -3 -05 by the Governor of the State of California, June 2005. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at h t tp: / /www. dot. ca.2ov/h(i/ energy /Exec` /`2OOrder %20 S- 3- 05.2df) California Integrated Waste Management Board, Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling. (Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at httD ://www.ciwmb.ca.eov /ColrDemo California Integrated Waste Management Board, Construction and Demolition Materials. (Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at htti)://www.ciwmb.ca.voy/ConDeino/Materials/def California Integrated Waste Management Board, Jurisdictional Profile for Riverside County (Unincorporated). (Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at http: / /www.ciwmb ca eov /Profiles /Juris /JurProfilel ast) ?RG =U &JURID= 410 &TUR =River ;. side° /o2 DUni ncomora ted California Integrated Waste Management Board, Jurisdictional Profle for City of Temecula. (Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at littn: / /www.ciwmb.ca.izov /Profiles /Juris/JurProfi le2.asi)?RG =C &JURID= 529 &JUIt =Tame ' — cula _ AaaeMMto PMGirya /ierrewla Sane Merparib Araa Amexeaon 5 -2 ESAi20M85.02 EIR denuary2010 {{ (1 t 1 6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations ' California Integrated Waste Management Board, Residential Waste Disposal Rates. (Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at www.ciwmb.ca.eov /wastechar/ ResDisp.htnT) California Native Plant Society. 2008. CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California (available online). California Public Utilities Commission, News Release: PUC Sets GHG Emissions Performance Standard to Help Mitigate Climate Change, January 25, 2007. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at hitp:// docs.epuc.ca.pov /Published/NEWS RELEASE /63997.hhn California State Senate, SB 1368, September 29, 2006. (Available on the Internet at http: / /iiifo.seii.ca.aoy /pub /05- 06/bill /sen /sb 1351 - 1400/sb 1368 bill 20060929 chaotered.pddf on February 7, 2008) Cato Geoscience, Inc., Aggregate Resources in the Temecula and Surrounding Inland Empire Areas — Development Opportunities & Current Conditions, January 25, 2008. (This report is contained in its entirety in Appendix D of this document.) Chartkoff, I.L., and K.K. Chartkoff. 1984. The Archaeology of California. Stanford University Press: Stanford, California. City of Temecula, Final Environmental Impact Report, Temecula General Plan Update, March, 2005, Certified April 12, 2005. (Available the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Dr., Temecula, CA 92590, 951- 694 - 6444.) i City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, April 2005. (Available at the City of Temecula ' Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Dr., Temecula, CA 92590, or on the Internet at http: / /www cityofteinectila orJLeinecula /Goveminciit /CommDev /Zoning /eenerall)lln litnt on January 10, 2008) City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, April 12, 2005, Map Prepared February 1, 2007. (Available at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Dr., Temecula, CA 92590, or on the Internet on January 10, 2008 at www citvofteinecula org Teinecul a/ GovenitnenUContmDev /Zoniiig/generalptaii hhn City of Temecula Internet Site. (Available on the Internet on January 10, 2008 at htti)://www.cityofteinecula.org City of Temecula, Municipal Code, October 2007. City of Temecula, (Draft) Plan,for Provision of Municipal Services, Planning Applications No. P07 -0225 and PA07 -0226, Annexation of the Santa Margarita Area to the City of Temecula, California, December, 2007. (Available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590.) Claude, Hart T. County of San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use, Electronic Communication in regards to Surface Mines in San Diego County dated August 23, 2007. County of Riverside, Riverside County General Plan, Adopted October 7, 2003. (Available for review at the County of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, or on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at http://www.rctlma.orp—/Reiieralt)lan/index.html MdeMUm to Na C of Te 1, Santa M arita Area Amaxeepn 5.3 rty ar0 ESA /208a85.a2 EIR Janearyxlo f'. r 6. Documents, Organintiom. and Persons Conwlted, and Acronyms and AbbrWatiom ' County of Riverside, General Plan: Existing Settings Report, Revised in March 2000, Adopted October 7, 2003. (Available for review at the Comity of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 951- 955 -3200, and at the City of Temecula Planning Department.) County of Riverside, Geographic Information System Database. (Available for review at the County of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 951- 955 -3200, or on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at http://www3.tliiia.ro.riverside.ca.us/pa/rclis/iiidex.litml County of Riverside, Ordinance No. 348 - Regulating Land Use. (Available for review at the Comity of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 951- 955 -3200, or on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at www.tlma.co.riveiside.ca.us/ planning (coiiteiit /zoiiiue %rdnaiice /ord348 article htmil County of Riverside, RCIP General Plan Land Use Designations - Zoning Consistency Guidelines. (Available for review on the Internet on February 15, 2008 at ht tD://www.rctlma.org(generalolan /zoning htmi County of Riverside, RCIP General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, August 14, 2002. (Available for review at the Riverside County Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 951- 955 -3200 or on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at litt County of Riverside, Riverside County Integrated Project General Plan Final Program ' Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2002051143), March 2003. (Available for review at the Riverside County Planting Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 951- 955 -3200 or on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at litti)://www.rctlma.org/peiierair)laii/index.fitml County of Riverside, Southwest Area Plan, October 7, 2003. (Available for review at the County of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 951 -955- 3200, or on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at http://www.rctlliia.orv-/aenera]Rlaii/al2 I /awal2 html County of Riverside, Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, Adopted June 17, 2003. (Available for review at the County of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, or on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at www.rciu.org County of San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use, San Diego County General Plan, January 2, 1979. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at http://www.co.sau- diego ca us/cnty /cntydentsAanduse/ planning /gpupdate/pubs /existin r IIitnil County of San Diego, San Diego County Code, current though July 25 2008. t County of San Diego Fallbrook Planning Area Land Use Map, April 29, 2004. (Available on the Internet February 8, 2008 at bttp://www.sdcouiity,ca.2ov/clT)lu/iiidex.litiiil to littp://Nvww.sangis.org/LibraryService/ DownloadedFi les/Igpcpafallbrookjpg Cunnif, Patrick, Environmental Noise Pollution, 1977. Addendum to the Gilt W Temecula Santa Ma aMa Nea A ontlm 5-4 r9 ESAI20aCaa.02 Elft January 20 10 I" 8. Documents. Organizations, and Pemws Consulted. and Acmwns and Abbrevis8ons ' Eastern Information Center California Historical Resources Information System, Cultural Resources Records Search, RS 14006, June 29, 2007. (The results of this records search are considered to be confidential by the Eastern Information Center and are on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. They are only available for review by qualified archaeologists.) Fagan, B.M. 1995. Ancient North America: The Archaeology of a Continent. Thames & Hudson: New York Fagan, B.M. 2003. Before California: An Archaeologist Looks at Our Earliest Inhabitants. AltaMira Press: Walnut Creek, California. Federal Interagency Committee on Noise, Effects of Aviation Noire ofAwakenings./rom Sleep, 1992. Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006. Fehr and Peers Transportation Consultants, Traffic Impact Study Report, Santa Margarita Area Annexation, City of Temecula, CA, Riverside County, September 2008. (This report is contained in its entirety in Appendix C of this document.) The Gas Company, E -mail correspondence from Bruce R. Waddell for service availability, December 13, 2007. Hickman, J.C. led.), 1993. The Jepson Manual of Highcr Plants of California. University of ' California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. The History of Temecula. Available for review on the City of Temecula Internet site at www.cityoftemecula.orjy-/teinecula/x Accessed on February 8, 2008. Holland, R.F. 1986.Califomia Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. i Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2001. (Available for review on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at htti)://www.gi-ida.iio/climate/il2ce tar /wel /index.htm Kohler, Susan, 2006, Aggregate Availability in California: California Geological Survey, Map Sheet 52 and report. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at htty: /Iwww consmv. ca. gov/ cu/ inf onnation /publications/ins/Docuineiits/MS 52.13d Legislative Counsel of California, AB 32 — California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, September 2006. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at lmttp : //Nvww.lcginfo.ca.gov/pub /05 -06 /bill /assn /ab 0001 - 0050/ab 32 bill 20060927 chaptered Odf e F 1. Leighton and Associates, Inc., 2007, Final Mineral Resource Report, Merriam Mountains Property, San Diego County, California: Prepared for the Merriam Mountains Specific Plan (NNP- Stonegate Merriam, L.L.C), draft report released 2005, Leighton and Associates, Inc., 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 310, San Diego, CA 92123, 21 p. ' Addwfd to IM Oty of T=m Ia Sella MergaM Nea Mnema 5-5 ESA/ 208485.02 EIR January 2010 I! 6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and AGonyms and Abbreviations ' Marian Koshland Science Museum of the National Academy of Sciences Internet Site. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at www.koshland- science - museum oriz Mayer, Kenneth E., and William F. Laudenslayer. 1988. A Guide to Wildlife Ilabitats of California. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA Facts: The Balance of Power in the Earth -Sun System, 2005. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at http / /eospso 2sfc uasa eov /ftp does /NASA- Facts- EnerRyBalance odfl National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Greenhouse Gases -Frequently Asked Questions. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at http: / /lwfncdc.noaa .eov /oa /cliinate/izases htinl ParkNet. 2008. National Register Information System, Search by Location with links to Web pages. http://www.nr.nos.voy/iirlocl.htin Search Parameters "CA" state code, "Temecula" city. Accessed on September 3, 2008. PCR Services Corporation, Air Quality Impact Analysis, Santa Margarita Area Annexation, August 26, 2008. (This report is contained in its entirety in Appendix B of this document.) Pechanga Band ofLuiseno Indians — History. (Available for review on the Pechanga Tribe Internet site on February 8, 2008 at http: / /www.i)echanea- nsn.eov Revey, Gordon F. Blasting Impacts Assessment jar Proposed Idaho - Maryland Mine, 2003. ' Riverside Transit Agency, Internet Site. (Available for review on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at www.riversidetransit.com Riverside County Waste Management Department, E -mail correspondence from Sung Key Ma, Planner IV for landfill capacity, January 14, 2008. San Diego State University, Field Station Program, Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve Internet Site. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at ht_!p:Hfs.sdsu.edu/kf /reserves /sorer San Diego State University Field Station Programs and South Coast Wildlands, A Linkage Design for the Santa Ana - Palomar Mountains Connection, May 2004. (Available on the Internet February 8, 2008 at htti):// www .scwildlands.org /rei)orts.asi)x to } btt p:// www .scwildlands.oriz /reports/SCML SantaAna Palomarmd San Diego State University, Field Stations Program. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at httl3://fs.sdsu.edu/kf/resei-ves/siner/habitat.phi) San Diego State University, Masters Thesis — Determining Suitable Wildlife Crossing Locations across a Souther Califoria Interstate, Philip Gibbons, Spring 2008 South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993, with November 1993 Update. (Available for review at South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 - 4182.) South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2007 Air Quality Management Plan, June 2007. (Available for review at South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 East Copley ' Addendum to the City f Temewb Santa Ma arils Area Ant�eaitim 5-6 ESA/ 208485,U re 20N83.02 EIR Jart.q W i 6. 0muments, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations ' Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 -4182 or on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at htti) / /www arc ind ov /aqm�/07aQmi) /index html South Coast Air Quality Management District, Guidance Document forAddressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning, May 6, 2005. (Available on the Internet at htti)://www.aqmd.jzoy/prdas/aqguideldoe/ag guidance oddf on February 7, 2008.) South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Data. (Available for review at South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21965 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 -4182 or on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at www.aciind.izov/smog/ilistoricaldata.htin) South Coast Wildlands, South Coast Missing Linkages— A Wildland Network for the South Coast Ecoregion, Undated Southern California Association of Governments, 2004 RTP Growth Forecasts. (Available for review on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at www.scalx.ca.vov/forecast/index.hti and available for review at Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), 818 West Seventh Street 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017 -3435, 213- 236- 1800.) Southern California Association of Governments, The New Economy and Jobs /Housing Balance in Southern California, April 2001. (Available for review on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at www.scaiz.ca.jzox r Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Internet Site. (Available for review on the Internet ' on February 8, 2008 at htti)://www.iiietrolijiktrains.com United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at http://www.ncizc.iircs.usda.goy/t)roducts/datasets/ssurg:o ) United States Department of Agriculture, On -line Soil Surveys. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at httt): / /www.soils.usda.gov /survey /online survevs/california/ w riverside/ maps/esm.A U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 1995. National Register Bulletin 15: How s to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Washington, DC: National Park Service. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Kids Site. (Available on the Internet at http://www.epa.gov/climatechaiiiie/kids/index.html on February 7, 2008.) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 -2005, April 15, 2007. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at http: / /www epa. gov/ climatechanee /emissioiis/usitiventorvreport htinl United States Environmental Protection Agency, Municipal and Industrial Solid Waste Division, Characterization of.Building- Related Construction and Demolition Debris in the United States, by Franklin Associates, Office of Solid Waste Report No. EPA 530 -R -98 -010, June 1998. (Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at www.qpa.jzov/el?aoswer/hazwaste/sg fl MdeM mto Me City ofTwew4 Sara Wrgaru Area Mneaaeon 5-7 E A/ e S 209 85.02 EIR Jammy2010 S 6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Conwtted, and Acmnyma and Abbreviations ' United States Environmental Protection Agency, Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances, 1971. United States Environmental Protection Agency, AP -42, Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 13.3 (Available on the Internet on September 5, 2008 at http: / /www.epa.gov /ttn /chief /ap42/ch 13 /final /c 13s03.pdo United States Environmental Protection Agency, "Six Common Air Pollutants ". (Available on February 7, 2008 on the Internet at www.cl)a.gov/air/urlianair/6t)oll.htinl United States Fish and Wildlife, Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit No. TE088609 -0, June 22, 2004. (Available for review on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at www.fws.gov/carlsbad/WRV MSHCP BO html United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Biological and Conference Opinion (FWS -WRIV- 870.19), June 22, 2004. (Available for review on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at www.fws.eov /carlsbad/WRV MSHCP BO htm Warren C. N. 2004. "The Desert Region" in California Archaeology. By M. J. Moratto. Coyote Press: Salinas, California. Reprinted from 1984, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida. The following reports and studies are contained in the Technical Appendices far the Santa Margarita Area Annexation Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2007041085). (A copy of the Technical Appendices is available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department, ' 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590, 951- 694 - 6400.) S Air Quality Impact Analysis, Santa Margarita Area Annexation, Albert A. Webb Associates, January 18, 2008. Trq& Impact Study Report, Santa Margarita Area Annexation, City of Temecula, CA, Riverside County, Albert A. Webb Associates, February 1, 2008. Aggregate Resources in the Temecula and Surrounding Inland Empire Areas — Development Opportunities & Current Conditions, Cato Geoscience, Inc., January 25, 2008. Addendum the City dTamecWa Santa Mtarganta Mae AmaxadOn 5 -$ ESAl209605.02 EIR January2010 i< 6. Documents, Organizations and Persons Consulted and Acronyms and Abbreviations ' 5.2 Organizations and Persons Consulted City of Temecula Planning Department Patrick Richardson, Director Betsy Lowrey, Assistant Planner Riverside County Planning Department Jerry Jolliffe, Principal Planner County of San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use Claude T. Hart, Sr. Civil Engineer Fehr and Peers Christopher Gray, Associate PCR Heidi Rous, CPP Associate Principal, Director of Air Quality Services Amy Kidd, Environmental Analyst San Diego State University Field Station Programs Matt Rahn, Ph.D., Director 1 ' Addanduo to me City of Temecula Santa Marganta Am Anneaalion 5-9 ESAIM48502 EIR January 2010 6. Documents, Organizations, and Pe Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations 5.3 Documents Preparation Staff ESA, Planning and Environmental Services Eric Ruby, Project Director Chris Knopp, Project Manager Mitch Marken, Cultural Resource Director Kim Maeyama, Associate Paul Miller, Senior Managing Associate Donald Ambroziak, Associate Jason Nielson, Graphic Artist Gus JaFolla, Word Processor City of Temecula Shawn Nelson, City Manager Bob Johnson, Assistant City Manager Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment Betsey Lowrey, Assistant Planner k" i- I j ' AddaMUm to me Gtyd Temecula Santa Margedts Area Ameaallen 6 6-10 ESA / 20aa6 .D2 5 EIR January 2010 6. Documents, Organizations, an Perso Consulted and Acronyms and Abbreviations 5.4 Acronyms and Abbreviations µg/m Micrograms per Cubic Meter I DU /10 AC One Dwelling Unit per 10 Acres AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards AB 1327 California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Act of 1991 AB 939 California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 AB Assembly Bill AQIA Air Quality Impact Analysis AQMD Air Quality Management District AQMP Air Quality Management Plan ARB Air Resources Board BLM Bureau of Land Management C &D Construction and Demolition CAA Clean Air Act CAL Fire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Caltraus California Department of Transportation ' CARB California Air Resource Board CASSA Critical Area Species Survey Area CAT Climate Action Team CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CDFG California Department of Fish and Game CDMG California Department of Mines and Geology CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CESA California Endangered Species Act CETAP Community and Environmental Transportation Plan CPC Chlorofluorocarbons CFL Compact Fluorescent Light CFR Code of Federal Regulations F CH Methane City City of Temecula CIWMB California Integrated Waste Management Board CNDD13 California Natural Diversity Data Base CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level Addendum to the City of Temecula Santa Margarita Area Aaresxtlon ESA /205085.02 EIR January 2010 6. Documents, Organiza4ons, and Persons Consulted. and Acronyms and Abbreviations ' CNPS California Native Plant Society CO Carbon Monoxide CO2 Carbon Dioxide CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Corps United States Army Corps of Engineers County County of Riverside CPUC California Public Utilities Commission CSS California Sage Scrub CWA Clean Water Act dB Decibels dBA A- weighted Decibels DIF Developer Impact Fees DNL Day -night Noise Level DPM Diesel Particulate Matter du Dwelling Unit EIC Eastern Information Center FIR Environmental Impact Report ' EMWD Eastern Municipal Water District EPA Environmental Protection Agency EPS Emission Performance Standard ESA Federal Endangered Species Act FHWA -RD -77 -108 Federal Highway Administration's Highway'rraffic Noise Prediction Model FICON Federal Interagency Committee on Noise FIND Facility Information Database FTA Federal Transit Administration GHG Greenhouse Gas(es) GLO General Land Offices gpd Gallons per Day GPM Gallons per Minute GWP Global Wanning Potential H2O Water H2S Hydrogen Sulfide HANS Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Strategy I' HC Habitat Conservation HCP Habitat Conservation Plan Addendum to the City d Temecula Santa Wrgadta Area Amoxa 5-12 ESAI2 85.02 EIR January 2010 r 6'. 6. Dxuments Organizations and Persons Consulted and Acronyms and Abbrev iations HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons HR Hillside Residential HRA Health Risk Assessment HR -SM Hillside Residcntial -Santa Margarita Hz Hertz 1 -15 Interstate15 I -215 Interstate 215 I -405 Interstate 405 (San Diego Freeway) I -710 Interstate 710 (Long Beach Freeway) I -8 Interstate 8 IA Implementing Agreement IECC International Energy Conservation Code IPCC Intergovernmental Plan on Climate Change km Kilometer kWh Kilowatt hour LAFCO Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission L� Equivalent Sound Level ' L, Instantaneous Maximum Noise Level LOS Level of Service LST Localized Significance Threshold MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MEIR Master Environmental Impact Report mgd Million Gallons per Day MM Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale MRZ Manufacturing Service Commercial MSHCP Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan msl Mean Sea Level MWh Megawatt hour N Nitrous Oxide NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan NEPSSA Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas t NH Ammonium Nitrate NHPA National Historic Preservation Act Mdandum to Na City a T.me�a Santa Mar�adta area Amaaawn 5 -13 esA[20"85.02 EIR Janua y NIO it I D 3. 6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, a Acronyms and Abbreviations ' NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NMVOC Non -CH4- Volatile Organic Compounds NO Nitric Oxide NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide NOP Notice of Preparation NO Nitrogen Oxides NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System OJ Ozone ODS Ozone Depleting Substances OHP Office of Historic Preservation OPR (Governor's) Office of Planning and Research OS -C Open Space - Conservation OS -CH Open Space - Conservation Habitat OS -C -SM Open Space - Conservation —Santa Margarita PAC Project Area Committee P -C Production - Consumption PCC Portland cement concrete ' PFCs Perfluorocarbons r PM -10 Particulate Matter (less than 10 microns) PM -2.5 Particulate Matter (less than 2.5 microns) PPM Parts per Million PPV Peak Particle Velocities PRC Public Resource Code PSI Pounds per Square Inch R -A -20 Residential agriculture with a 20 acre minimum lot size RCIP EIR Riverside County Integrated Program General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report RCIP Riverside County Integrated Plan RCPG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide RCWD Rancho California Water District ?: RM Rural Mountainous RMS Root mean square ROG Reactive Organic Gas R -R Rural Residential RTA Riverside County Transit Authority ' RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Plan Addendm 10 the Clty d Temewla Santa I Bari a Area A eaa80n 5 -14 ESA /208085.02 EIR January 2010 i 6. Documents, OrganlmtJws, and Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations ' RTP Regional Transportation Plan RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SAPML Santa Ana - Palomar Mountain Linkage SB Senate Bill SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SDSU San Diego State University SF Sulfur Hexafluoride SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer SIP State Implementation Plan SMAA Santa Margarita Area Annexation SMARA Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 SMER Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve SMGB State Mining and Geology Board S02 Sulfur Dioxide SR State Route i ' SRA Source Reception Area SSRE Source Reduction and Recycling Element SUSMP Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan SVP Society of Vertebrate Paleontology SWANCC Ruling Solid Waste Agency of North Cook County vs. United States Army Corps of Engineers SWAP Riverside County General Plan Southwestern Area Plan SZ Scientific Resources Zone TACs Toxic Air Contaminants Temecula EIR Final Environmental Impact Report for the Temecula General Plan Update Tpd Tons per Day w is TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee U.S. United States URBEMIS Urban Emissions Software USFWS Untied States Fish and Wildlife Service V/C Volume -to- Capacity VdB Vibration Decibels VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled VOC Volatile Organic Compound WDR Waste Discharge Requirement c AdEerdum to the Clty of TememAS Santa Margarita Area Ameaatian 5-15 ESA /2pda85.02 ER January2010 F 4 EXHIBIT C Statement of Overriding Considerations The following Statement of Overriding Considerations is made in connection with the proposed approval of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 (the "Project "). CEQA requires the decision - making agency to balance the economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve a project. If the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered acceptable. CEQA requires the agency to provide written findings supporting the specific reasons for considering a project acceptable when significant impacts are unavoidable. Such reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the EIR or elsewhere in the administrative record. The reasons for proceeding with this Project despite the adverse environmental impacts that may result are provided in this Statement of Overriding Considerations. The City Council finds that the economic, social and other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant and unavoidable air quality impacts, mineral resources impacts, noise impacts, and transportation and traffic impacts. In making this finding, the City Council has balanced the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable ' impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts. The City Council finds that each one of the following benefits of the Project, independent of the other benefits, would warrant approval of the Project notwithstanding the unavoidable environmental impacts of the Project. A. The City Council finds that all feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to either lessen Project impacts to less than significant or to the extent feasible, and furthermore, that alternatives to the Project are infeasible because they generally have similar or greater impacts, and do not provide the benefits of the Project, or are otherwise socially or economically infeasible as fully described in the Statement of Facts and Findings. B. The Project will provide the City of Temecula with control over the possible uses at the Project site and will ensure that the land is used according to the City of Temecula General Plan designations and zoning requirements thereby ensuring the type of ultimate development. C. The proposed Project will provide the City of Temecula with 4,284 acres designated as "Open Space — Conservation Habitat" for the enjoyment of the City's residents. D. The proposed Project will protect and maintain the research value of the ' Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve ( "SMER ") benefitting the City and the State by ensuring the research potential in the SMER. The City Council finds that the foregoing benefits provided through approval of the Project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts. The City Council further finds that each of the individual Project benefits discussed above ' outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the Final EIR and therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable. The City Council further finds that each of the benefits listed above, standing alone, is sufficient justification for the City Council to override these unavoidable environmental impacts. U d w EM O = co R q� z . J u3 w N W . .. z > ¢ Q ¢ W EE a H O C O U O U O a O Q O F O F rc � d z a w z c o 0 m o 0 0 0 inc c y ° °di y ° ° did �' C y 10 U N C ' U fO C • O V n rn C rna C N � d C J d d Cc o d abE co CL co c o O' z —U O 7 a c7 O Z~ Q a o c o w 0: «=�' 'v d Ti a3t c_w Ow .o.m 2c2 W Z o f v m c j K A m m KQ D fa a`c9U O a ZQ F Z m � Q Q 2 d d c N Z H W .� � a 3 d r o 0� �� o2 9m3 N c« a v w d O. N w y 'O W : O O C w N C U N j N C Z d= d C J O> d y N 4 w jp 'fb O E _y .d'W NOI t w d and �Q d0 M Ma ca aNO.E m'y a m dm w m._o,E90 n Z EO w wcd w ai 0 ga Q Q � N E 2 w � O E n w m N m d L L d y o a; (741 L^O .5!` L w = > ow 3`o ro � a me U O C N U K d J C d E w w of d w m�dw C O E O Nw yC U` J U d .o. w O� 2 0 U a J° d C w Q( C d C a o d E w c a v 3 d d � dod-- da Vi c' zm my N y N N O j o w N N iis N p� M O M t M« H� d d d C d p C E Y d w d x d y d O p d d 0 d d'�y d y d d d d d d d d._ d 0. 0 0� o° 0 C z'd `oc o0 0"d 8 ao ad >> "d2o aE:' a.o i7d =,oE a m «�-'w� _rnac of _mm WE=E` N d d ~ U Co N o H d d W N N r p C L 1p 0 F d >.c d amm dd« C Nddd OOd C NN�.�c CaCd Nr'C W rK d � 0• C T p C r 0.= T w- ? 6 0 w d C� 3 d m U w `o y�' ri c m i m nY H d a E w c c a: o 0 ° ' V d wS w n y c.� m v w m a w m E d d a° °t" W E < Eac ° c E au� 5a u m N 6 Na 3 G C U y 00 m9 c y m " C T m m m `o� O Q U N U y U m � r r r z i m 3 y n n n 0 0 0 r 0 m m > Z 0 d d m w m ❑ ❑ ❑ I IL 0 -1 m € `o 0 j incc $a sm=« Im o« uj 2 ¢ yD „'o ma yams LA y m y N 7 2 - U c0 (7 C7 r0 � F LL rn m rn C Ol y C y C MW O W U m M0 m 'p ° y C _ y C m m C LL Z N D* 5 L U� C C L C U� J G Z C m min C O) O J C Mca C Q p L C 'o m C m m ug fa ' a ' ❑ ❑ ❑ ¢ An ° C T mn y r _o y2cy a y5 c c = «Q o ° c cm n mEcd m¢ a H a m m N Q G N m �. m o M cJ� a d 3 N M m `O y« c o Q N m y 0 T v o m.� N Z F m v o p n" c :: o w> c J m t m.- to 2 m ° �� m NILyJ «oa m > o ti a`m m' - �2�Ay M%7f 0 dQ.. m0 mJ Moa WAG oZt °U�a'i�°u'0 mN �Ea � owv -. ccm mo ° m.- - O y`_° O N m M o m m �+ c._ m m c C L U c m m Mo ¢ 'm a 3 0_ m 0 o m ..- - - =` o- > « o w c n n c m E o Z c c d m �, c r m ZZ v' m S wm E M, `od °aY mOr ,°�`°d. - K m2o,o =mE n:z Q¢ `ca oa (1) CL 0`0 y m y m N o.2 m o a M 0 0 Ot 3OUm ca oaCna mmm..my CA y0cc�m0 m °c c w ) ' ` 0 md� o o o y ' u0E` m ccc�m 012. .mew Z � UEE00N>a_a °Cm�E"O0 ao.y U o m = - °£vw ° >c d a wo KF c a -U O m pyym�a...c m'wm UOmu 'ma u xx m¢ o =-M mo ° tSm «so c a; c m x O y U L Q am= N U y O N J m m Ol y C y O m Q y C_ L N 9 y r u "TY''_FLQC2 >m n2w mm M o v - y T maOcMNmm m Z o c o'o u t m m li 'b man di a . n o L ` = N a u 2` c o'o v 10 m �'� o m m n 3-e a_ m m o m$= y J m y n- J c w._ v U m m o ° E F e o m m n m a c m M m ui ?@= d 4J n£ w LL O' « m L m _° y m m - 0 n c m K O o? e d V) Z 8iS me d > my O T-o C J .5 E:e mT= `m c > ° Zd 0 5Cw up m j<o x�od_md2? Bi U ��i�m;Qc Ja CO u om ��c�L `m LL_ c T> 3 tn c E m c rn a a.N m m Ti m o m m m S v c > 3 N c E m c M 10 F a ° a m e B . y y m m$ U w LL r m n aK_ E y a w E 10 m r Q N V n- m N 46 N N C n T y C 3 ° m C . V N m y Q O N = L .. U N N Z O m m 26's 2 M y m� n n N m a m a N O Vnia p O U w d'UQ yai Amoy m ^ M atn3 QV� fr O J C C L N C(O N m � — O J. L m 0 a m m m O M C m y p m m v � m E y m m= 6 t E 0 ° m y m C " = G c O fG y C y N C= n H C T> T>.O r N 4 c O c W O m m 2Emo VOQ y.�. m a"m" rym�, >dNCN m VOQ y..S�N Z.Lu m - m c y N d y a m c o f i� m m E 0 .3 E 12 o c a 2a Ewo�U N mE m acMo, ; c`c,`w ° m ,u doo a- - °rEdv UommE mrn W a as m `o >cOn w--a c i0 u..:w m>p _d .o ��a a.� a i+T n n J Q..a�aQE =o w.>- .•c.o>U>�3'vm W y °nJ O- =a�`!o oEJtO LLJ f a N it o x f0 m� U LL L)) m C C 9 gy N y m U M n o a= C f m N N K O= l0 m U N LL T m C m m m� m r u m n m c c ° w o ° ma= yNON °m �:io m m T� «a�m`oU) °. fA m n' N a 0 2 m L o m B 0 U 'p� _ C .L.� N n > N m O C >, `_ CD U E m �„� > !g $ �;= ;O m 0 vi o C o C.. O �LCmJmy ° >y 6 wtCO�0 a 0 a20 D O '$ vy m o voryo m C72 u o `° -mtiE� m0 >n c aomn � ° o �� =m�m'o y riini ao�a acE - °m Ma w - m Ea0 0moEmmm — a�U7 Eau J m me mu�nvU u A N 6 E C -6 U y ° 35 r N c 'C m > m Q q C T m N 'c W U Ua y 0 Q F ~ Z S m 3 c c e ~ as > w m o a IL w mcc w N c' «m °�`ma �ma D 4 tR a A c c A c rn KZ aC E w t oa of 'o Yl 10- Vl O �ZO _U Cam' Ua 7 LL LL OW � "m c ° a 3 `- LL Z E N C� � L O 01 Ot' m 1 S c 3 C �Z O Cm MCD mr c MV 0 V'� C 1; a Q O L � 9 M m j O: Too m O C G aW f o;a m o c� a mo U C? Q a m Cpm Oo c l - K a u d o ° m'r°- - O c c o� Z a Q c L L co ' o y c « .� 3 3 m �' .� nt a O € E y E m r c c a m KO °'�' 3 3 G€ y c c c c o - '" U c do �mct4 dc c �; 0 m ycN p. �gj Om dd .°_ or N € o 0U � ui !e m a m a Q U N m N p 0) C E m OI 0 a . U a m m V l0 a N Lu v!e m '�c�w �On< xmM _m waU a wm�o mm'°cw2 LL' MM- mom cOtco oL ' -m2N'3 :! -3 v y$amV; OH o.w E'3 Ll I'& �m w.« w , 0o > `o tn a mo�dm mcw- -M a - _ ��m Z n L) — 0a0 po CY, m w�, y.� T'.` ° �n� 3 y `° ° , ri � QN m > 3 E 0Oaa �r rnQ A = - « a a . -Mm m U`cc din 0 _do- LUS Urm my m U.S .a me U. V Z 2 o 0 . °ttt °U' .2 ° E c�:.,0 LM_ym tc cm r °ornc a'F L m 0 16 ° ;ao E 0 QUO _' -.3 m ~ �mc to w ~ -m c ~ -° tg mm O yy 3 m E d U w t J m N O« V U O C� Mm N -'u N C C- ° m O E ~ M000 °' o :2 ati =ms d =c-mo c£ 5 mmw °3n m0 m'm1012 O E a d w c u w m r N U' m= O ` a �� w m� 2 .c m ` c_ d `m m m yy "E� m =moo `m , C ° ;°_:0 `m 3�yN�o w �y ° 6w`O 0 ��L°� m5 TO 00 ZO y? `o= O o oU Ti�>U U o U o 1 r. 2 a�� 2 �E° O c fmE`0 =' . m3 d m Tiv 0- cc o c o - o a t E m c ° a M O v E N O ny' d am O m? O N E 0_ na N m O N W L c w 01 0 '.: w 0 C y Ca N M N 9 U > E w m a m N m C - N ' t: 0, 0 2 N C C m U rJWr mt 0 , _. p C>: 0w Z O) mU w « ~ M - ° m c c c d ° o c a K y .� w E wi « E I c a o « c 9'0 « c o'� y a b am:90 o °v mco� `m pEc €n fovy p lea �ac'c f ° _ daui6 > >-6 cp 5 tma DLOCC Z'o U- I O Cvmm"rn - w0 wy; `°LE C ` N w 0) >CNp >YIUVUI >mN �O41 m 0 0 w W10 N a�w e WO'[ W°c� C_OtN Q m Ol N j O) m mE NO�'Om BOO QLL 0 VnNU m COL_ Carp -� C 0° O'C c m-`. C e m - S' Az CZ-- C rp p e S� TC c c:°. a mE co`n m =m o c,� amm°2'= . E`3 av�ct3 m0 O O O- m�°-- m9 m'^ Of W. w'� NU N O13.Q «d °> m� NYI `w ° wa ' m66 'c W Ol0o9.� O J p 01 ° U`mm Op w`O'� «01 a C'Oaa ma _a wy m L°oEu m i>a _ m U pY m CU C«0 C e f f f3�5o d33� ac ° a « adwO adU f2 L u c�A� (�d3 w U'MU)m0mM y v F m c' `w m o a Q o E °u a m o ~ °� m 3 m c t A t o Y °m �.`oa w'p H - "cu m i C-, n omA =om p 0°pw mO �occm d Z' H N N °c ° Qu pa ° O N c aOi�QEm =>-Op �� �oc�ymm °�a ' >a a °5m m EjE m a �.'-.. rnE W E E a of n$ D U U ° c > m d c 1 E E n 0 u w E c m u c _ m N 6 m O C U � O m O o 39 M: N W � C > m 'C U p U o¢ UE f ~ Z 2 m � a m a 0 ~ na > w m o a O j mcc °c WN WO u'vE wo W J ._ c M Qc° mm= HO LL m R' W, a c a y orc c OW wZ ° N �� Wj CaL a (Jc2 C m - m D J C U W m y QQ oa °' �W2M o` co Q - ' W f m U a m o U O d N O U O N N- N O N C N U C O« N U L A N M d 2R' J9 0 o c Z m m: > ° aria c ° c .2 °w� Z>'a oa�t=ncm oar WO mom3 Jto, m E 2 O c o ya U) m., ; ;,ic -, c v j co --.> 3E w'`L 0L a E i N dmy >d�y_0 OW «0-ac c w c a . -y 3 � m c m e 2 n` E NL Cc aQ mmm c ua in= 3 t m uDJ w y H?: N/N 0-. m - p. n9 00 Q o> _ y U CaC > N mmU dCN W� Jm u ES mm ymr m m w �'m C .m – MWO €am ma _m = «RJmD. GF M O 1 m r m « c – mm o –m o s ca cUmw w ail n ydN yomc ° H i 0E'' E2 a ZZ 00 o Ncm 3 11 C Y1 .. (')a, 0U�Om Ma11 mfnE �w�NLNm OI.V NC ^rT Qy Uo w- Um Uom «v -c° U°mrn>.m , Uwd w� FEZ mT�aav Za=-6 � F Fwc6 Nccc He - «c .E oL Fmm`° -dctwn ~ NSds 'R EWam °n -0o mzy O No:'.o ` mE ° Q a HmD me O a y 4 J v v u =U' E W>.0 >� °c yaoamc8o F - uc 2E m v a._a. « w3 a m ac vl m € > c 00 -m n M M Emm ` M E ai w m L c Owm c b 2 N O C a N U y N E m a j a m J N E C a y D L y y m N S C N C C C O m a O w m o w m c w 'Co O f�a ui 2`- 2 m - c m 2 m o y`- « - °E> f mu c a0- -- ommmmo'a°m CmcD am c�wac0 co c oo`m– o -wc`N na– .. H °cmc 0Ot 3 c 2 m J c ui m o'. E g 3 mEa c C c a E9 >m0D pE -e Z – r am MMEW m- m`'y41 =01NN mddEm-wmaN mCN`� V N �UL' =ryC Z Wdo� a'u f0 Wrgm�e.rmm WN C m me m` = o �cmam amc amio o'o a3 >t> E cm - c a:°N E� -2 «mv.2 m « w�N cr%) mE em. C c fug- fdwcwoom 2 EmEym fEo..� oE�m �2 L.•y Wmm m N J C O m J m C m U Q: « m m W E C w �. 0 m 5 0 O: y N KF C C. O C T J C S. �• d n O O' C 'L_ UI Mu c 0 [ct cE c�o'o „m c`o. « ° -c m.mc CEy a2 a u - 0MO 't m x - ° � mm m._ .a f v m o�c m5� mNUmE�cS myCm «r mZ`c °tn 5 i�o: oc, °d v o EL aq aco�c�8 ac ° = ovc°' ac ° u >� Rmat"ua :.oEE_my s L o m L0 ° `cwEa c'�amw a -aoc �mm"ZW:?Zmywam «° P c '.a w m m'um mo mn_rn'H2d momE2�`o mx� and =m3 \wOJHrmNm`NOwJ f U dOwc O7 E U' a = 0 o� >'m U a- o� - � 3 m? t7a�a ° �6 C m $a c w mrno N 5 m E E m r 9 ° MI c y N U E Q« c wE m U m N 6 !? C N� U ° O m D O q � J U3 Cy m > d Q m C T m «° OQ Ua n F 2 2 m � a � C ° Z ° a w w m" o a O m ouJ j Hcc ycy 111 N C i:l A U m a o U n O W O u a E N 9 c R Z <.s c° y m HO U Ua 7 H LL � q C N N !� N �Y _"O O LIJ O Z 3 N O j 7 ' C m m r N OJ C U O) m N Q a °a ° 'EK om m o c o K ll f m C� a m J U U u� ¢ 3 m m o ZK o- ym �rn ° c No Em E °m m cm °m L'" a F¢mr3 a. c c w Z'yo o n'i£c o'H wc$ 2 ji tea. a a mud =E u ° c c� — 0 "o ma =TO a u W cam_ 2 v Nd Nnof °u c ° ; m 0 0° E c � ° u u m a c m J y a° m- N J a m a Qa y c o m /LI m ° a �Q a Em oN N c L,m a�a0O m d m c ° a pF UNLNo� Lm. °aZ rn3Jm =ro o —c °u ° uooM L) Z Z N L N = U rn a m m 0 0 — N O L a L U J n m, y N W m N n m 2 m O N U m€ l o- O� V C c� ui y L Z :E NymVlj N Oa ymmmcm NU me .- U) O d' F $ G �� N 3 m u U m n m v t a c m m �' $—=, 3 a c m cx a N': n m F o mmo J O oaymmam w 0 0a_A � cd 0 . O 8. J c v '0 M Z f aa;�Em0 a w O1 5 a mcm .0 a ° — O `Oa aa 2 ° Z a . y c mm$a,N ='^m - ° mi0 ' a: - c O acm Imo - a'93 c a MO my 0> m 8ACa e m omME. ° mdNy mcyonTi �$�0 93�r n j, o m z Jmm o = �mrnn aaaoc _n m E m c 5 J m U> o a' y'm o y s a G m E E c r 5 O L a N OI c N C = m a N N N C C m O C m 0 9! N C U O U C m L m o m 6 N C m d -2 n° 3 m y a a m J J a 'O a m aL U yL °ILL._ C m Orr m m xcmu Z rnn o oc L mL a0ma�E �m f I m o - o J9 c "cE co2LL p c � N mn C m Nr =tNNC G OUm d°y 0NJN > O 0 `° F NCJOa� CN v ° J U m ry N oI m a m o_ v m ti m Ti a 2 - 2 'y � a m 0 4I LM oA�E�v p oi ° cv °$mg m a c ema= wcEnio o f am n J C�EE uc °oc 7�$ma ai ° m �� mmE�cm clam R y A 1 E � S c D E ° o" m '> n w E m u m N 6 �? E C Ul `O o 0 M w f0 D) m m c _ c v O U O U O m d m o¢ U E U w � F H Z 2 m � a 3 o S ~ as > > Z W I IL -i m € m € j H c c y d O d wN 0A_ U a 0a o = m m W O U O E a a .Z Qc0 ° _ Nm DO _U m - (D LL rn m 0: m •,-- c O W C N N U N U C -- LL Z Q � Q • C L QIm C C KQ fa jma 9a w o 0 a a m F v = m Q am a ymTi 0. 2 mo cd co 0- J�i J L N d m m o N y N C m C d d d LL •_ O- =a L m J a d f6 O� 9 acZ oa c v U `.a 0 - =y•-m R a wU)yyan m- Ct ooZy�dm�nya d r J N =� c O d a d' d Z y O.m a y y y a o t N E Z f N > Z d U C m C m d Ld r 0 C' C Z Z 0 C = N x `- m d= .O -0 y - C Q a - E U O- -- N d v= 10 E m = s m 2 -, ' m o n o fn yn xTN N C .m. maL =mOI ZW m0 U3 n�0 Qa 9 d$U w Nw r 'n Q d n'vc MW , 0 2 � �r m y E � d m O N w_ - N OI V U m� 0 o o m a `0 Ely y r a m A o� r c m c n� x O t y y m m 0 m an «YN N m m O.- 0..: Cy r J c p m N E c a e N m � d - ._ L o N > d Z m y O d d 41 m J a d^ H« 41 m y H 01 O m V O m E> O m c x= c- Q J o o L r r c J E m m F.. Nm�vE a � Q co dr °r NO�m =r - cmm ry Q N m Or N. O E m? yy m d V N 0 r L 2E t y y = L O= O N o O d d mw y m d C 7U N d L d J d m .�-, C a d C F_ Z Nm'C �. Q y jC2 L dL N m d L 9 `) LL Z.r C «.2 C a y m O T 3 W O 8. 2 L m C m m m U a d m y m m E d y y L n d C d 3 m- 0n.m a f O€ a U OO N U > g a E v f 3 d a .__ x„ d d a H a w N U u 2 c C u S x m m = N y 'a-j 0� o o d O d t y (/1 `y N* to N W « N N d j 0 >> W O u m f fn�NQ� >a 3?��w f�ananN m o as n1 '3 m t a 3 U E L U Z d 0.0 F > m 6 a O U C d U N N 6 y S n O y d c O {p U N U 0 d N U > a a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m w E E n U a m `O a w n u W A w n EO C N U y O O A C 0 O 0 u5 w N_ Q m ami > Q C T O m N N Q C N O N O N 9 c rn U d U E U E w 0 r r r z = m a w T n n c o 0 0 z 0 v > a w I IL O w 0 od o 0 0 - ° a oo€ .�.. C NN o,o m._ w N m U U C m w N p N q 0 0- C O >> c c v n 0 m 0 C rn rn w0 uoE °> u m�c0 Jmayu , H _z - 0 0 0 0 Ur m LL ~ Q . � 01,,, c c o c w Ow ° mom a3 _ =y I z $u rni O1 m ° °U Z .0 R c m OI C N a J c o m N � W f a o D o a 0. a d) T Q m l0 _ J F y C 0 C N 0 a 3 U N O y C '1 w N y a O d Z Q J N m « ". ` .J « J= bQ m O 10 C- I m M a m 9 C 2 fl y 41 a r U N a> C a 0- O - O m O Q N .(J. y O_ a O- w y . 0" J m 0 ' a w M~ T y U y 0 a O W a 8' a C O Y N a M C a N d p UI O y J N 3 � m C W f a m E d m c-JO a a v r rn a a o M , ; F o m m v 10 w r m �+ m a o y o t y o �Q 02— M o� ° c oawc_ > c°�m`c!^$MM >L V a cS °c °otuaJE�` mQ =°.�a� �H yln >6a Uya O _j OYW,�m MMO w ° fON m« ZZ Q Q O S l C J N _ O VI C e ,= U O 0° w E E m O J YI N N C m� C� U- 0 U M 5, 0 I L_ y NmmfO N' �wo 'c °w- �OdSEry mm u J m¢ w 0 co3 z ooru`()al�vaa J ��c m a m « c.4 U Tjp 7�mN� ��SE��r �mudmc�c KF N'm" -O GdNCNlO NE N Oa N'00CN CU I ON m �. m M2 0w rUL J «`DINE O m 0 L . O'O m m m V w C L= a' E 01 m N a m L O a C r O N O C 6 ac a`Im € me oe m.� p a cr0 „o ma¢ mo Z ° c ya o =n 3°'m.12 JO 8UO a g a- a w ml M ymv f mm R o 0 r_ J c �mdy rn�A� o'� oo E w n£ o >g, a c r, m - ° dm2w () .2V�m z m` o�w c.cm3 Egon c 0w a 3 mr' ^ -m °>`° m ° mmm?a �, m �' oov i°c J O N C c 0 c min ...>m M mL C.� rnm. - - c 0 u� 0 QwM8 0 Om _MMW'M :: °00v � Q`- lOJ c�ci�u.c .` r L o u o? a .� m o m a �'c w ici w o m m m 1' w a vE U Q y °c v d o o E E -� c N Q 00 ' o o ._ w N aUn - ° a'r rwtL maN =OmMr ma NY wO mMCMmO°IQ n 0 m m1G m m m to o._ mm I+I mu m > o 0 MMC z MrN o£aac �vom M J w `o wu a nm oyami �� ei �jAC da 00 a Tr >� m`E cm�aNd `u�,m�T g nw �� d rnm`E3mo�O J Omv�m w w J q « r( '6 j J . 0 - 2 - 6 w N U m « L... m M m m w N t O U 6 w N� C y U a Z E p � M N� Q a a m M U C E O A t> O U C L a L- J U m w O U m O a- N W 2 C t' C U C 6 f f= >.cm�E ° U�a f om ° fnwmrwo3�� - ° a w f�am }e}11 n y E y1 om O O { ry w ] a E ._n O C C 'w ryQ C U C_ ° m a C 6 C m L C l0 O a 0 y C a y w � y w� a C y C is A E R N` N O C a U C m r` ( 9� T C C r C 6 O C T C U 6 a q C Z` Z ` a E ppp m ppp C U a U Ol OIO N>N�C� L_ O1L .= U�:: fOVCaON OI Cw0 O= CO 0 0 0 tN a d 3 f n m m U Z a m E a d m m m m a f p u a d 3 d 0 0 m F m N m ° m m w y m v m w 'o a E H t m ui m a o r y>. J M c 8 J o E c o D w 1°n CioEu ol' 1'+am 1 pw E m T rywry O w y M a J w q 0 12 w m 00 = J N J 0 A 0 a 3 o J m p dc WE 0 E ° um���mdt Ea °uxd�m` u m N 6 !? OS U -m O O u9 W W m C m m m 'C V p V 1 O V 0 UE OF OF Z S d � a y n n a c o 0 0 R > o m d v as > > > m p c o a c `ow _ c o j H c c o€ `o o m `o_ N m m n o O o y o WN F «m o� ��>;��a °yin ��m' >�d °y'c°n WO 2 .2a �aE � of €� C� 'u yw�cu�mNnu J u 7Z acv � 2 ma 0¢ 0 J'yo ma 0¢ 0 E'oo �O - - 8r �F LL m O C O C �tl! O V C- a OW .0 .. m m m LL Z E N U U U N U N OTC OIC K f �� � CL ❑ ❑ `o Cl o` S 0? Q N d m O — N d d Z_K oy 0Hmt a c �t��m H ~o` = ;�>, o' ° d °a 6a a W as 3�aaimcoEr d�ui� ca E o, a 0D'c0O°��d 3 ~mo 0d 0 �a °c o'm?rnc m oc wU�mc E� oo$ m d m o 03 Eaim_`m 0 v -�� m _m > - m �$ m x- _^ g g d m o m y a d T m m E n 'o `� x c CL 6 Q yy CL 8S W O O L y R C Y >i d C N d r Z J N d o C O O J U C r a 6 N O m" L a n O m e d C3 F- Q O C O C O m d a d m L C L t m m T C N m> L m d m L !tpp d .~ r r d > - a N S c m m_ ZZ L_m -'�c mm:?15 Tio ¢ ° d^�a Y?M aJy Cmmo uo - - m O y 3 " : 0 a a c cE me �9qc €o 0 oZg "g ..L moEan nmA$� d w d A m m a C Z W - rn r = m m A¢ m E c> ?? d o v E c d c m a E a r d m c O c m m o a m LLrf >¢m cvi -c O 0 m -c O mo - cco 2' E O _ a w o m E o E a m=°°- 3 0 E F v n m m m N m o 0 0 0 o 1 d o E o 6 ~ 3 E Ecom o'omw mr NN mw " . ma £'r a — °o_DQ wo'm n o E m y - O m y y d J d° U r/ O ` C a y m O m 6 w y N C d r o y d �'� O 'p� O O.2 N "•' C ONY m 'Ei NUaOU.m. = y 0 L6 >m OmOm.m =NaC 6 ryN COCU O tDw 0 O —Z O >yw0 €�d0 Z H m o 0 =� '> E j u �' y ° I��' a C D N C v U p y a L a y =O0 c N m n c 33 g V m t O 0 c A a y a t y $' a o y m o m o = c t'e `° c m e umi- m m c m `° n E H UE °L m'° ym - v U. o min �'un c ° r a�g d._ cEa cEm0om r Q wi mmo �aaiKd -53 mr a -`o_m N p y Ti$�dmo`ym6 o m mcr''°E d`m m of o.Eft a - i 'o @- rn'C L2oo i H an d $mom 3 o c m - $ U c a c J d iN a > m 2 c n w v r H d N� rin y = . 3 oc�JC ri3c m JyO��maom ai�o m c L`a _ mdd., 0 a m UaJ �c °a m mo m Op 0 O. =° ° �:?�Ctt S i m A c Q m m =° " m t m m m Yi� ?amt °m E m m y 3 m d c =� c a m o'3 Q m E c m 33 .0 f f aJ3 fw ( Q3x�d� f�='ac � -wEat 2 Cum v o o ocmrn °�oaiU°- Aoa.Am000dm m fro 9 F m a., cac L,cm d'« c « « °a0E co w o M 'd '� ° cLU J� m a m 2 0�m`-cm =' ° mac - vE occ °mr �. < a m > y m.c- 0 a £ .c rn d m 3 U z o a m c E a o cc o W o a y °c ° c o m y a E° 0 d r r m m 01 1` m L ..L-.. °' ' 2 mQ U C O d y '+ N� N U O E� m == L 2 O? O. C Q L C 0 f fz as mmr Em3 2 2 a S:E mm mme�: fvn��odnm3°wnn mE anH mmo N T c T d p— V a m j c m m q F m N m O ° 0 ~ m >J - m a , c mJ m S a nS � Yv_aL J 0,2 th a U m 0 0 U C r d J C O C m j m m ° m N m a T O° U m '+ m 0 U m . N m t t M C C_ y m U m C m m :m ma ss ma ��. >>c av Evm a°n�a o' W E E a c H U S'w z a D E n v o d E a 3 a m A N c? o = O Q Q C. O � 'C N Q Q N , Q C T m N y 'c m rn �jE UE Z � a N a o ~ ad > i Z W m O O f IL -j ro � CC W H C C O O t > $a W 'cam °°'a 00 ow O o v E °` c C QC =� =2 Z U m m LL LL' c y c N c y :2 Y U V O W - J W J d LLZ «o. CO CO Q � Q Z 'cm me rn� aQ f �a a K o 0 rn a � a v d o w m I C3 W 0 3 = a am E c m a Q auoo a aNm0> 3 f E??o ESd ° Mao N cv - ar m LNO- U L 9 N U r ZZ �' m 0 O O L ° O r QN nc'caOC acarnrn Z W OT N NQLJO)J O E y E N a O 0" O f9 O) O OO �°, O >�a T_ f am m 75 . r, p a Z N N C o n N .. — E y O O J. % " O L (C(pp 0= p N O Z J U C 3 V J E d 6 N Q L_ LO ;Ny am- 0 0 C7 CL) i im �o �r 0 E i D m m m N r J W M � :c O o wi N M0 5 � M v od m m y Z E O'O - nL " a m J JN2` m<c Jvom °cc m m m E a p � d y y a 9 y 2 y UL O. N 0 oao °Em c°E'u o? ° Z m W m m o= a y _ e u fw d m f aimn� w '.sue d L d d N ( y O d N ry ` L " 0 02 y C L r C v 9 C U U L N ° ( N L r C L r ° 9 O 'O « N ° d C d �ON y CdSLd �` � NONAp3C= ..d- 7i �',.O --.OW V " 0 0 ` ¢ N yN a 2 `o o f€ r v m_ N m_ o y r c c ` (z j o TOOmr °mac °cmma,°rN ` O"`mE�o a ..-, -. - ( J (pp C V._N'odtNc e N d C C 'p N_ N N Y1 rl N E y C` N N j N m C C l0 N O N W l0 " J U m C y C N N j 0 OD /IO _C - _N 9 ONC UO9 N' . N .ftNJJ UON Na g t52 C a J a° ° J L N L ° ` ° O O C n N N a 0 L N° p J L N 2 L 0° L L O O vl C a m 0 N L' O WE a E n3 mama a�°Om`° o O' a N EE N 2' o o N E a3 NamaaacaNOONmEENEoo C « > C « E T o N C C L W m y m (0 7 N U C L N A_ c c m c « U y« m a d c v c >« U d m Y, 2 c o,m dm nm O °, 8- 1515 «mErn° 20a aomo5 «�E mo O.E -mpm mm£ m o.L 0L,m � y c mO mmL dnt 0c m�mc °- .� U 30 E= E -O- 3 U 3D E= a E.,o 21 o «Ecc`mmoy" ='_ °ny o «Ec�'L = O 0 =m W o o= o�n c a m y y m �, 5 0 0= c to c a U c w v m L C ° O O ._ m m m .. C L y A O 't jp O° N E y r C ` L, yl c m m U o o m c E° o m m `o E m m U o o 0 c> W o o m m a E 0 3 y o m N o `� n o E E d o m C o 3m > o E C(n nn.- c._m'��com>Dm nn'n`OCy��amomn Z p c - m o O m n m E ° u2c - y� u n o.EE ER2 C n nEE ovl .;10 m E" . .; ` E'' C y o m v ° m U ` W L O V ry d L O V 'c W 'o D E � pc 'o D E fa Uin Uin z S m F - a 'y o'er 'NO�5 3 C " -oaE ° A Q �m c m c m W ma > m mm =F- a0 0 m — 2 a: 0 DUtAUO 0U(nUo IL O ' C C ° ° T C C C W N C :• A C O Qi d L O OI O 4on cmEm` -°o. m,3_EOma O u'a E Z Q C O N m y° H m N m ytn �z —v - a `o= - C L Q O LL Q 0 X W, c c c y o 0 rn O W my LL z p d c 5= z Q S00- 0 c o p o W U U � o Q CD c M I ° O m m °. m p V (O m N L m K m m 'uE =m my t5 .0- c>m�omm a y> L E m m o. y - o y U m r °� 10 o =Ea; aimmnmc �E OW - - '''ncmomy EymO°�a«mmcE O «m -_ �EmL, -U LEArny.c Etifno Lu �:2 �o «oom3a � y`'v o _o Q a E o c y ,c m.� m N« =, u U o r E E 3 y= m = M O o: U�6 rmmcoom =c0om Zz :! «�Em Em = m �,j - M UU mF-m as Qy °- 'rnEnma « LUE dctup� = > z S E t aUD °c« c>'rn> m o O wy u.o LL,r n= E m c m,�mL°, °�'m 0 ca O con o cEa 0 - m- , - Ea0i .' z o mm0 °m moVJ um '��° OyOr= 0E O m m o U y U0, E, c y.5 _rn `o - m o m s« y nw n m 3u> ymm..u . E:! -.mac gi' CL apwc >ma «mom m 0 ,y �m �tnO Om ~mo= ya 2a0c 3 u aui om L m9'a c a rc as Nnm ac?m>. Q ~ r L y m E U°« m (V N m m O= m n n Y! C O n y a u c c t a@ v vi m r E '- r c E y z m .- mm'? = o 350Ern ym = c K S c.. ° mca�i v u TE a f 10 75.L) d v 0 ° p E c E a t 'r.° ° z E v o o f ai E c E° m o t o m t m m m L o o « ; m `c m° > >ntm =d mO >' E r ¢ a of o _aEamm L' rn tvacE ° c m,5 om E �' f E W «m cc faQEO « ° c of «UE w Q u m I y m m y m m m IN C U 5 c roo a o . o,Z 0Ooma ~oo`E« 0 3oy`uUmnnc- ° 01 m °O wwm «.�c mm o owa t�c ro,yom c'rom c or 0- C(L u CY L 17 C . O ° �yN TO� � 00J " E 2 .2 LL.c y" �0 Q O S V O m > O t n >.m m m L C m O u L m L 6 T m m N� C m S LlI m K m 0 !E c c o 'a mm>=ommmw =p mmtn mc°+� na v m > °omm o+ww rnommE� wE F- Em- -°Etnw >EEmd'm=o'yo Em.. u� E�n� >ES m'm=o'�o3 «QN E jk {� E -0 ! - | §!| �; �m a !7r § ,� §j$ k! \#r @ - # \ )!ƒ 3!2 f E2 §1!!] 0 ) }�k I-. }i >o >U k § 2_ {\t} )2 k §�§kk M z ` o ., [® §B 00 )§ 0 I o IL §\ ) §m. \)! ! °» ® ; Lm §.> §) - )$$\} \�f #§ k\ `#i\ §$\« {i) 2® / tI�2E! �)§ !!m § !a! 0� k) ;£/ \7! ! ;7 # ,- a o z \- - <2Ew) 3: q kf« ƒ!{ a- " « !!g g co ) : -SwoM+ !.! § | {- -E �`0 ) - . 'a 0 0 - ) M W !f(cEkZ0 ))§ Ea . 0 0 a§ , §k!!J{« , ! !t( 7E E 0EZ t !# �! !| § ;! ! $ , Q ! # k {t / / ;( \� \k{\\ \j )ammLd2 - | a !«Qe;lQl±fz ® )!®\f & @`�$ } §® �a!§e;l ®!!! °s « ®! » :«! -» ), ® k ;)(:2 p !!_ ;l "pU.LA- Q§ «*�! #!ra■ I£ !E- ■,oaE:E am ;l ;e,Er[!rBl;,2EE!!l ;;o m O N O m O N O m « L « a N m N J W-2 O O L C^ O L m C^ ER 3 0 E m° 5 3 d w a� m E m c E w E E ;.p E O E� c c J E m c c J J o N F -= a m o H o 16 a m 0 - = J O N« y O O m .m. « m o m m m o > �a E° �.c E° m m cu o °o� y °` °� Q o. >U y f 2U o o E Z 2 m _ 4; - Z a >o >UE io >VE W m p0K H pUO: F a 0 �•q q m'n p oK w m'a o oK N Q W N o c N' - °m v�coc m Z Q c V = d U n 3 t0 0 = a o. � ( E � �0 LL ~ a. W c c p o ow C N S LL Z p d C c C J Z a cl Cl 0 a o o U U a r m9 �'m m C n - a u a 4 JU u mrm c� c p c m am c� c p c m 0• RW cc t O > O o�o'm �NCVTa cm ` OW K m�!L+a O m UUNCa �m as m> >mc °_ Er i - ° c as t3ta �v E m i o ° « ayy o c oa W �L ° O o r m m m Q>> � m p c F a- c r N m m o >> S m p c a. d• `U >.E firma P O 'c �'.E �'; 3 m.. �>.ma �° °'�nr 3m Q ° m m a m a a M �; a m m N N m o N a c a s !� c ; a m m N m ZZ 0 oa o'm 'c c- - «« nK 0 'c ' ;m oao m'ccE. -m:` «M QN a ° d O -5r mom �E di. «m ° -a c y 03iO a - SrmE 0 L ZW L•E a o` %R 0 , a 03: .e E m C m3 `m . .e E m m 10 crn ;m: cyvs m L � 'm m ` c cram; m«cyaa mF 2 c m>.am 0 mm «C C _ Jm °•. mUcui m momm«c o Jm M CH J o a mw 3mo ymoyooa >. °O ;5 uT oc'" d,Y•Ed 3s cL' Udomaa ar cr �`-°d °u ca'o J�cm ar m'u Z aaoo v E a c i c m�U c'ic cya °mm�`a °-t om Emo 0J5mo0.5- cic cya L'n?�m,v mEmoc «m9 EE moa 'mmEcm a m> EE co Z jjgmcmm do «�$ E Nr- mw rn mp'L�0 -,- om' O m o t y'c « E x a m m.- >° c Ti m o N `� m 0 a « E x a m A - > °' c u a of a -0�o l°m o'ac NmmKm o«10dm U-' A m - 3 mm rn«a E'er ui �- m- LL am m c o v «�EEo.�aLy m,:° rc�U' mca y.-:g EEora «H `m z r via d « « = . co -- ame m0 >." L' m °o `° °mc 5_ C 2 L C LL O J N C C L m o« V M C C M L q �- = O J N C C L m N« U F `•'� > =-z 3: m a ta c 4 �mE. J nc ° uac `Lo°a am °o EmEoic mac � Z N N m t N am > m- O L C d N m N m a 2. 0 U m > m E U L C d N 2 m N 0 m mU m m ,nm--m nQ� >jN m m a °oa mma a <O >j0 c °- f f 3�w�c 0 oa m,p n f co' @' �o °� °cyE '^�' a O5 2 m c c a CJdm NL a"am ->. �._ m5m cmwm ;aa L`n�am c •a° ac 'o a�C�ti Etim °rvE9 o o «md a `m w`Sa - m • E`mm'ov mami�acc am arA >mo � « ' a °cc tdmcL a n F m >mo 3 f « rE «2�EEa o« 0.23 fU §oo °mo FErw3E: =go« U.�'3 9 m o L a � _ gym.. u Tm LL a. q c5 m r:°.o ao N„. 'n ci l^0o0 >�o z. m m n c m o a m N ° �, 't `c m 3'm O O U V O m d f m o O U m >` U m °` an d N O m m >.o Ea u� mm'? EE m `�: O or �a aomm°- xUw °o aa a o�y « -.010 o a J.a W E Ea «U!_^m�No`�oo EarN30 a « «Nam'�� d O N O d U C L L « c_ a. m 0 A 'a 75 jp m w O O L E" m�wd' -°•� N U C c d E 9 m d e E d E ° ° o Esc -`;� o» m E a d p J o d« jp Or g d. ._T. u9 d:. -d. 0y Em J ¢ > d 6 �� E° rn C T O d F d d 2 O U O V $W 0m y.d 2 U d H r N Z 2 d 3 a d` `o d d N> a °O 0 z na 000 E > W m no H a c W 7 O m y m d m N > . c m d a c 3 c o w 0 y o m E o �N O 4 c 0 2 c U `0 3- O' N Ix aC U a Z �+ > U0 �O OF LL m c 0 w ac c o y O W c m'F I m 2 LLZ 00 c 2 2 J �Q ct Oc �co m W a U `o LL' f a ? ui Ord v � °- °- mAY E d U U U J m 'O c c U C d U J L d d 4. ZK wm.5« o� d d ° 30M wa X20 2 2ui ' T� HQ L d �^EaE mc"� d, E dm« w ins ct KO �E d E ma m gj'mu NCdam Sd w o> a o_ mYadc d0« ON y Q r ° «�mm E m« 0 0a u 0d N 2a 0> NO coo r3LaE0 0 - y « m > 0yc as a.o m ma m v c W< �S3m= o rT dn o M - ME 3m N a me dr °�� :??° Q 6 o m a c a a d C 3 m m d m N d m m £ « I « u G ° J m c m O 0: E ; d O 0'm'c c E w d �° « S £ E a a d c« w a a ° dui 2 Z r c= N a c d > d o 0 u d d v d � d d m ` > d a c QQ °w «�m o�` mc'�yv od Ym J�or J Ju N €m gicy �'S'�E 3 a y c E v m o D o 0 c o d d c o o a - y c O W J d« c C 6 d C C - O :.. d F d C r - d d E d d an d d p U C RH d 3 0 Vi U' d E ° c 0 c`o E- tw s` ta Ed mmc� N y.. ma-, 3- d d L= O J0 ?,. ?._ c ya c C Z` N d a N� N— N J N J N c F_ c�o ac N�cLdJ!oy o'u Nod ' J a T iy co J � a d am pd E d�00 uc cca 0 —�6 ` � �" u_n °wra c O rn�EcA yv m�«G�d EE 0wo dT..m 'ate 'an ado ao - m y E�d dodnmo E>o� c ca dd d °'o a Uz`o m L° mam m a-.wc `o c Eo E Z �w °��rn �n£� d -E ; 4m d dt >` d� d d ` dr -'z.Em E« m O d d d U d :.: E lC >° Yi ' c L .L.. d L L .F L o r(. J 3 N d> «.- �ad�'3._Ty O cJ F ma F o Fy r m '�dd - u ° i Ed N {p d `m E .n d d K o v c c T c 0 �.v - U'mcv L LL EEo- a L J a`�E. ' ° c a n ��i , t m 0 E �' i r r m0 Z' _T Ty mLE d�c o ° ••0 :20 9-500 92 OR9 m 2J «mdm m- 0 �da a t20 Ow 0E c... �UrE 2d @ 0cc mm°o � 2 > >a oU n a ,E a s dmEwc mac may. - 'a Jj Jd J52 =m J'ncw m O d > d E t) L c d N 0 d N Lm m C C T N N N d C 0, m N .5 � d d N 9 p O a d d N d ^' d 6 Q % > Tj N d J d d m d a d« U d N C d> d d �d�d ;va 0 n�nm a>. �' m - 6 f 0 f m c Ccd� °- a(7 ymmm m��rn.L -y E!?d�L ° -wpm a a ° rn - ° � > >w� E pmt m dAcd3' wrJnucm` =m E:E cnc d OE rna d worm d r ny ad oy m od «�'co tdm a P E d F - '° >dJO -'m ..o aA �d ° c Tor ca r Nt a°� f m fU3 o °du FE..w Zi E::a o« 5_ Z(n Eco f Sm Em ' (5 0oa fd..m N V N p U T y U - d d _ L 0 T� d� E N J.A F a N 4 0 0 0 ~ a a C O d m O d O •• U OA « U O C t4 'YC m0 O6N CN O".0 U Om m r C O d y N d ° N m .2o C E 0 W d d d Vi U C-, t+� O O � V...L c d� > O OU Yy...O daF ddO U y�yy Cd d d d V T O d E a �_ N d din O 5,6 �a a °mm. 0a 0. �' 'o °. `o nmda WE E8._U!P W�0- E0 z E0 m5 dro0 m u c _ _A M 6!? O S U - o m o � _ J . 0 'S c h m m c - u o m OQ 0 Z S m a m 3 c n c o 2 na > W a a � r m W m U o € c a° r > . !! C C O m N 5 m W n tmj O N c . N m d O� L a c c Q ° u ' C m� a 2 N N (p Q ma J WZ Q �E ° N�' Qcr E_� - '^ U''� -, aa, o HO m dm LL Q ~ Ir X mad me c q d y 0 9 u V O O c 0 O Z LU p m t y 0 2 L O Q Z TTl nU NU n2 0 4l2> KQ 0a � ¢y`�o ym W N3aoJ`o u au K Q Q c m $ o y a m a O` m Z Q '^ o w a c m y E A N ? a s 1 Z o c d m - c m c z o cQ a K C7 a L` a m a u N m m c m u E E m N w m m m E p� m U c w C m _+ w - ,& Ti c m °- m ° Eva c m m m m e -- a E CL Q J m a O o m c a m m? A c >` m �_ c L L a H H A c w W E m 'S L 'a o c m m c E-° om c amo yc m `o 'D �H ° o m o a w i �':: myy ymx 9c > mat ac o c mEamv ZZ Z nc a c y 2 mm c-.m m:5Qhi -b m c wo g mo ,nm m U N m N Q Q 2 a'= J O a y Ot N N may n C 0° O' m_ O d w m e W p .. L C m .. �? N y 0 V L y N C $T N C N '- C m O m u c w N« J J J aim �y as ydc c6�cu " "m8i � y Nay `wo w a ca um E c m- aaim « 4 ._ m m m c c LL v m a$ m E L c'« m m« 3 F m� O m 10 mLa rJ ° �' y a. N L m U m N y U n O n N C N m U a c E U O C` ai a m .` C m m n m m m Z m n e c c m n 3 c c MM 00 w a m Q m S` � wr ° °�m�co w u 4$y$cm1 yEw o,� ° y: m n n m -yam Z m a $ 6 m J J ._ j m u t >. a y h .O Y' m > a_ «'C N c U m n w u^f 'm r L 0 o m m :_ O no m m w' OU ca"w m , m �,y uywEo ° >D-.- or w n° tm�'c HA F Q C m O UI � m L O O C W m y m m m m m m n m L U N m m c C A L Ql w m E 0� L E c O m U n m N 3 m a -. m c E- _ m J m 2- 2 0 m W (A c c 0 a n 0 ry OJr 7U N mO y�2 C mmm m- a =ym ° 0 CN41mc Ua Q Cm n «Om O° Z aia E'c n mc AOR E nam caul L.'w 4= !emo m J c o._E�va fi ya c °c a =m 0cV p , Em Q 0a -Z 3Euoy6 c m d° m� E Aa- ° ° co�000�a n Evdd.a g'�N cc N' -'m - 2mnm 1 5 ji °- f fac c3 va ° aE _m J 'u U � J- Oaayyv a ow m ° s o.. c,o mm�n�nactw 2 c cm a Z` � a m wu JC> 1E acwww QNL"Ow�ccmd >Z`y - m c a a ° °w ap m9N mJ r mm� mx0 Em .�mm'>m myc c m mm mC E Uo(na «Ow fnFm�na n N o�mp�u nw a._E EwO mavaym S :W Wa Fa a` ma a m crnt ._ x cE c o ncQ NCt «" � f So. �a N cimmm Jd m h '9 w o- oaQ0 yw F a uc m >.Uc 8 N _ N c-, mam�E U Q U U 2 m (` UI m U c m m U U m '>a ac acwnEin� W E EQ o m.=_ m n F 0 m J y 6 !2 O. S N U 1 ° O y C O w u5 C ¢ d d � M d O O N O m O d a U E N 0 r z = d 3 C n c 3 z na > w d m o a O r d LU J d € c a o, d O - WN C"- °c �m 0 O O T 0 d n m 0 a 2 y d m n W O u'oE m�v QcrE K Z a C° O'S ... c.a '- o F O - U - m d y o U� LL Q a 0 rn 2 a' X C m v D o �� ' ° y n° w LL Z Z Cy v aMcc nNn9Ni Q Q O L ? �` U a Q c d ° o c CL K y m a c o u a d Q Q o 2 O aA F 0 Cd� - Ol y yL d y 1I _ - 2R' >�o�L' d$cy$g'am�a c E m . :C t d V d �Q °�:..m `ai 'o �OE -Ei a - O ' E d 0 �� '=dd " 0 O a u m o m y v m d � w a d a E a= ° d °' m y 0 d $a 0 :5 d O� c�Edia nwwZudim0O.zoa d0,m0 u =..a aEm v`omm C Q d d O C d y y y 3 O C 1/i d 2 d O V L L 0 d d L41 a C d K� v ° o o�m ad£o mtr °a E- gm o o v>.c 'oocE O F ° a t0 y a« w =- 0- c a C — ' R o c 0 0 u y_� m Q � a d E ° c ZZ Ti E Td °>. dm:°a €dre u o0 0 Aro- d d =md QQ yL'orm °w ma,2q"S�my��??�3> g'rn0a� wLC ° d ?cm n5.°° ' W x. ZS y $ w °d of na EE°c�a yac rnm- o m = O no rn�ar O~ on «o@= miO '�OrvyEv';n Edmm3 do "' 0 f2 C° d 3 y d ow y y � E� 0 o a c 3 c s o m a E� F c gy m 6 0 Z 'T - io`oa r E M' 8 r _°m d- y v y C d F d 'O L L .. T N Z' O- n y0 E d C° N N .d_. C U y a y E 12 y 0 f cy6 ��O r� aEw c'> c a ° c E�wI? 1 y pa -°+ , mcn p - E, 2 1 ' nZ T ° C 5t0ywn�mta ymonoo �mro rn°op a j o c� F > $ovaLdddn�o �'°m m °n °c o ay c > ya m Q dry =�o'0 '60 M> w ° E Ti `O m=- _C_OL N V d d d O i N O C C L> u- O 0 d 2 C= l` J °'° y Z F u0�°L^taa Ea6,085 E w O � p 2` o E '' Cs°c nwL ° c E0Oa> �0Ed 5 C N C d -6 C N d d N O A N o E v" m m o da o o y L w t C o t0 . O L d. y u c `m O C { a E d d u d a `• c m 'u 3 E a d d o C � 10 N C E° C C y d d d U Ol y `O y d O d 3 ° N y d o j 0 T. y d T C y 103` L d> °L - d d O O E E > U J d N d d m H C C d °. y 'O O . d 3 0 w d 0 3 m c dET =a�g AL'ooyy n'dacy of ww 3 GUdbN S 01 L ° d U a'u� M > ac =i.c ° �dc °� a a ru2m d,`o_ > ° �rx� ¢O dt d a wvv' - a a�io> ° m y 5 w r a b' > CJ > O V 0 'O r d 6 t0 6 y 6 t� d 2 d d R) C V 2? T E d n 0 y r (9 O C d U E o" d > a w E