Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-037 CC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 10 -37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING GENERAL PLAN MAPS TO DESIGNATE THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TERRITORY AS SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ( "SPI "), ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 2.4 ACRES (LOCATED SOUTH OF FIRST STREET), REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES (LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF SIXTH STREET AND PUJOL STREET), AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO DEFINE SPI, AND AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT TO ADD PROVISIONS REGARDING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LR10 -0011) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan and on February 22, 1994 the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan, B. Various amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula since February 22, 1994. C. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is a comprehensive amendment to replace all sections of the Old Town Specific Plan with new and updated information. In addition, an amendment to the City's Zoning Map, General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Specific Plan Area Map modifies the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres into the Old Town Specific Plan located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street and excludes 2.3 acres from the Old Town Specific Plan located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map includes a new land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" applied to all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan area. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan defines the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to ensure properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. An amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan adds a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan. ( "Project "). D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -37 1 E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ( "CEQA ") and circulated for public review from March 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 for a 45 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. F. The Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Project on April 12, 2010 at which time the public and the Old Town Local Review Board provided comments to staff and recommended approval of the Project. G. On April 21, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on April 21, 2010, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. I. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment and Title 17 Zoning Map Amendment. J. On May 11, 2010, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Environmental Impact Report, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Environmental Impact Report prior to and at the public hearing. K. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 10 -36 certifying the Environmental Impact Report, and adopted Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. L. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the General Plan Amendment hereby finds, determines and declares that: R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -37 2 A. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; The proposed General Plan Amendment and associated revisions to the General Plan conform to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted on page LU -26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. Minor General Plan revisions will provide that the new provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan are integrated into the City's General Plan and are required so that the Old Town Specific Plan can be updated to continue to support the City's General Plan objectives for the area as outlined on Page LU -29, including preserving historic character, enhancing economic vitality, improving public facilities and services, circulation, parking and encouraging infill development. The Project also complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to general plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. B. The proposed General Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; The proposed General Plan Amendment provides for the implementation of the Amended Old Town Specific Plan with development standards that ensure the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments; The subject area of the Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (page LU- 32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire project area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. D. The proposed General Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -37 3 As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU -30, Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific Plan was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the Amended provisions of the Old Town Specific further support its downtown character. The City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU -40). As such, the Amended Old Town Specific Plan provides guidelines that enhance the area economically, preserves its historic cultural and ensure the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. California Government Code Section 65358 provides the authority for the City Council to amend the City's General Plan. The City Council, after full consideration of the entirety of the City's General Plan hereby amends the Land Use Element and the Circulation Element of the General Plan as more fully described herein. Section 4. General Plan Amendment. A. The City Council hereby amends the City's General Plan Land Use Policy Map, as described and illustrated in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, to designate the Old Town Specific Plan area with a land use designation called "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) ". This amendment hereby incorporates an additional 2.4 acres located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street into the Old Town Specific Plan and excludes 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth and Pujol from the Old Town Specific Plan. B. The City Council hereby amends Figure LU -4 (Specific Plan Areas) on page LU -28 of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, as described and illustrated in Exhibit 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, to align the boundaries of SP -5 (the Old Town Specific Plan) to reflect the amended boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street into the Old Town Specific Plan and excludes 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth and Pujol from the Old Town Specific Plan. C. The City Council hereby amends pages LU -14, LU -26 and LU -29 of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, as described and illustrated in Exhibit 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, to define the land use designation "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" and describe that properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -37 4 D. The City Council hereby amends pages C -19, C -30 and C -36 of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, as described and illustrated in Exhibit 4, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, to add a provision allowing for intersection level of service to be as identified in a Specific Plan. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11 day of May, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: usan W. Jone ity Cler [SEAL] R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -37 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 10 -37 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11 day of May, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Susan . Jones, MMC City Clerk R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -37 6 EXHIBIT 1 � a RANCHO CALIFORN .... ., NIA RD M-RENO RD O� }/ 4� �.: SC B DARAY -CIR— ::;:;:SP.I: — >:::: :.;.:..:..... •. •. BARLOW DR: SIXTH'ST ` r SIXTH ST �FIFTH'ST N LM :• W FOURTH ST w w ' Land Use Policy Map z •.......: :::: O CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN " -- MAIN ST Z �—I Specific Plan Implementation •3: :•�� ' RESIDENTIAL :'� ® Hillside (0 -0.1 Du /Ac Max) O h ® Rural (0 -0.2 Du/AC Max) THIRD ST 0 Very Low (0.2 -0.4 Du /Ac Max) © Low (0.5 -2 Du /Ac Max) 0 Low Medium (3 -6 Du /Ac Max) :0 Medium (7 -12 Du /Ac Max) High 13 -20 Du /Ac Max SECOND ST COMMERCIAL /OFFICE — Neighborhood Commercial '::: Community Commercial HT Highway Tourist Commercial iC Service Commercial EIRSTsST FIRST ST Professional Office INDUSTRIAL _ Industrial Park PUBLIC USES & OPEN SPACE Public Institutional Facilities N CORTE Vineyards/Agricultural y Open Space 0 Tribal Trust Lands SC O Recreation Commercial Overlay �, I: / 0 75 150 300 450 600 _ - -- - - - -__ _ - �. —___— _. -....1 - _ `Ndw ^wv.w.c+✓ni.�u.,ryvd roan wgvw w. p�mwe nne EXHIBIT 2 Figure LU-4 Specific Plan Areas - — - C17Y OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN Approved Specific Plans SP- 1 Rorpaugh Hills r „ N SP- 2 Rancho Highlands l "' •���" – — SP- 3 Margarita Village s County SP- 0 PalonWPaseo Del Sol �1de LJ sP- 5 Old To g g g 4 5P- 8 Campo Verd SP 7 Temecula Regional Center SP- 8 WastsideNillages at Oki Town u SP- g Redhawk SP -10 Vad Ranch ` SP -11 Roripaugh Ranch : l SP -12 Wolf Creek SP -13 Harveston� uw PDO-4 Temecula Creek Village �+ ' PDO -5 Rancho Pueblo ' 0106 Dutch Village • ` # 184 Rancho Bella Vista 0238 # 213 Winchester PropertiealSilverhawk An . a' #285 Borel Alrparka # 284 Oulnta Do Lago #265 W #288 richester 1800 . a a ,, v #238 Crown Valley Village - -- - -- _ -- #313 Morgan Hill #1i4 Future Specific Plans Y Spaolftc Plan Ma Y Z Spec(fc Plan Am Z - - - -- 0213 r�'d g SP -11 SP -13 SP- ! i �N 4r •i� t N h�w� wi. SP4 SP -7 SP-3 w • SPA an.rr a. ` P,2 SPA II IIII i; SP-8 Y t � Z � � �♦ SP -11 •> #313 l ' •♦ AA SPA .•r i • SP -12 t • • a. Temecula City Boundary t 4 • Sphere of Influence Boundary Planning Area sacs, Teneculs o18 NW CotWM Waes/A —c.9es N 0 5,000 10,000 W Fee g , E • Miles CLIIi'. I N I: K A L I LI ,� EXHIBIT 3 r L I TABLE LU-1 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS A Range of Target N Land Use DUs /Net DUs /Net Summary Description D Acre or Acre or FAR' FAR Commercial uses that require extensive floor SC Service 0.25 -1.5 FAR 0.30 FAR area, including home improvement stores, U discount retail stores, furniture stores, auto dealerships, and light automotive service. S Primarily single or multi -tenant offices, C PO Professional 0.30 -1.0 FAR 0.35 FAR including legal, design, engineering, medical. Office corporate, government, and community facilities. Industrial Uses Business and employment centers including professional offices, research and IP Industrial Park 0.30 -1.5 FAR 0.40 FAR development, laboratories, fight manufacturing, storage, industrial supply, and wholesale businesses. Public Uses and Open Space Public and private uses including schools, PI Public/ 0.20 -0.70 FAR 0.30 FAR transportation facilities, government offices, Institutional public utilities, libraries, museums, public an g alleries, hospitals, and cultural facilities. Rural, agricultural, and vineyard uses in areas VA Vineyards/ 0.01 -0.2 FAR 0.03 FAR around Temecula. One dwelling unit is Agriculture 0 -0.1 Du/AC 0.1 DU/AC Permitted per lot, as are non - residential buildings necessary to support vineyard or a ncultural operations. Public and private areas of pennnanent open space for such uses as parks, golf courses, recreation facilities, natural open space, OS Open Space 0.01 -0.1 FAR N/A recreation trails, greenbelts, lakes, utility easements, active fault zones, and undevelopable portions of floodplains along waterways. Tribal lands held in trust that have important TTL Tribal Trust Lands N/A N/A economic and environmental benefit to the Qty, Territory designated by the General Plan SPI Specific Plan Varies Varies Laird Use Policy Map as "SPI" shall refer to Implementation its adopted Specific Plan for a description of allowable uses and densities. 1. Assumed level of eve opment citywide. Since the development rc as occun- to ate has not reached e maximum allowed level of density or intensity, future development is expected to be less than the maximum on a citywide basis. Therefore "t t" levels of density/ intensity are used in projecting future development. The target density/ intensity estabfishes a ceiling within the range which cannot be exceeded without Planning Commission/Gty Council approval. 2. The target density/ *intensity does not apply to the Medium and Hgh Density residential designations. Values listed in the table above are for analysis purposes only. LU-I1 EXHIBIT 3 Table LU 3 summarizes the development capacity of the Land Use L Plan. Within the Temecula planning area, capacity is provided for approximately 166,250 persons in 53,700 dwelling units. A N SPECIFIC PLANS Many areas within the City and Planning Area are subject to the plans, policies and implementation measures of currently adopted or u anticipated future Specific Plans. The purpose of Specific Plans is to provide comprehensive planning of large areas consistent with the S General Plan. A Specific Plan area designation is used to identify 25 E such areas within the Temecula Planning Area, which because of size, location, and/or special development opportunities require a coordinated and comprehensive planning approach (see Figure LU- 4). In identified Specific Plan areas of 100 or more acres, approval of a Specific Plan is required prior to approval of any discretionary land use entitlement or issuance of any building or grading permit. In some areas, Village Center Plans, which allow greater intensities, can also be used. Planned development overlays can be used for smaller areas. Specific Plans must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 65451 of the California Government Code and the City's Development Code, which contains some additional requirements tailored to meet local needs and conditions. Designated areas will require detailed plans indicating land uses, circulation, major infrastructure and facilities, open space and parks, and appropriate implementation measures. All Specific Plans will be evaluated for consistency with the goals, policies, plans and programs of the General Plan. Approved Specific Plan Areas — As shown in Table LU 4, a total of 23 Specific Plans have been approved within the planning area as of May, 2003. Specific Plan documents for each of these areas are available for reference at the City Planning Department. Approved land uses for each Specific Plan are shown on the Land Use Policy Map. SPI — SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Intensity Range: Varies Target Intensity: Varies Properties designated by the General Plan Land Use Poky Nbp as Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) allow for land uses that are uniquely defined by its adopted Specific Plan Properties within this designation are subject to its Specific Plan policies land uses densities, planning areas /zoning districts standards and design guidelines. C, I r 1' 0 F I F NI is �_- U 1- \ C: F \ F_ R \ L. 111-1b EXJJW 3 TABLE LU -4 APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS L Label in Adopted Specific General Plan I A Fig. LU 3 Plan Location Description/ Objectives Land Uses Acres City of Temecula N SP -1 Roripaugh Estates East side of Winchester Pre- incorporation Specific Plan including residential and L, LM, M, 200 Road, north of Margarita commercial/industrial development. NC,PO,OS Road and south of Nicolas Road. U SP -2 Rancho Highlands South of Rancho Pre- incorporation Specific Plan, approved in 1984 including residential and VL, LM, K SC, 237 C California Road, west of commercial/industrial development. Hr, PO, PI, OS I S Ynez Road. C SP -3 Margarita Village East of Margarita Road Pre- incorporation Specific Plan, approved in 1988 including residential and VI, I., LM, M, 1,345 I L and south of La Serena commercial/industrial development NQ PI, OS Way SP -4 Paloma Del Sol/Paseo East of Margarita Road Pre- incorporation Specific Plan, approved in 1988 including residential and K NQ OC, 1,368 I Del Sol between SR-79 South and commercial/industrial development. O, PI, OS Pauba Road SP -5 Old Town South of Rancho To preserve historic character, enhance economic vitality; improve public -I I BC 448153 California Road at the facilities and services, particularly circulation, parking and drainage; and to SPI intersection of Old Town encourage infill development. Front,, artd- between Interstate 15 and the west side of Pujol Streets SP -6 Campos Verdes South of Winchester To provide residential uses near Ynez Road and Winchester Road, designed LKCGCIS,PCI 126 Road and East of to accommodate bus shelters and other appropriate transit facilities. Land use Margarita Road densities and design to provide a transition or buffer from adjacent Very Low and Low Medium density residential SP -7 Temecula Regional Located between To develop a regional commercial core to meet area needs and provide a OC, PO, PI 187 Center Winchester, Ynez and community focal point with high quality site and building design. Margarita Roads, and Overland Drive SP -8 Wesuide ( Villages at Old South and West of Old To provide complementary land uses to Old Town that increase the vitality of K K OS 149 Town) Town, adjacent to City the area; to increase the range of housing opportunities west of I -15; and to limits. encourage sensitive site and building design given the topography of the area. L I - I - 1' 0 1 h t:; , \1 I' C 11 L. A G I \' E 1Z : \ (_ h L, A LU -29 1= EXHIBIT 4 In most cases, the right -of -way shown on the mid -block cross- ' sections in Figure CA will be adequate to accommodate the through and left turn lanes shown in Table G3. Right turn lanes will typically C require some additional right -of -way on one side (the entering side of i the intersection). The additional right -of -way shall be a minimum of t six feet (10 feet is preferable), and shall extend for at least 250 feet R back from the intersection curb face. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Evaluating the ability of the circulation system to serve Temecula's L residents and businesses requires establishing suitable performance criteria. Performance criteria have a policy component that A establishes a desired level of service (LOS) and a technical component that specifies how traffic forecast data can be used to � measure criteria achievement. i The performance criteria used for evaluating volumes and capacities on the City street system are based on peak hour intersection data, since intersections are the primary limiting factor affecting traffic flow on City roadways. Performance criteria for freeway ramps accessing I -15 are based on V/C ratios for each ramp. The performance standards are summarized in Table G4. TABLE C - 4 CIRCULATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Peak Hour Intersection Criteria Intersection capacity utilization (ICU) not to exceed 0.90 (LOS D) Saturation flow rate 1,750 vehicles per hour per lane Clearance interval 0.10 ICU Peak Hour Freeway Ramp Criteria Volume- to- capacity (V /Q ratio not to exceed 1.00 (LOS E) Source: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., September 2003. 'Except as provided in a specific plan. PLANS fN AC TION The City of Temecula has an intersection capacity performance The Crty strim to adri w standard of 0.90 ICU for peak hour intersection operation impacts LCS `D" for peak lxw except as otherwise provided in a specific plan This standard means irrmaaim operation arud that an intersection is operating at 90 pe rcent of its capacity, LOS `C "for pwk hcan" corresponding to LOS D. In addition to this ICU analysis, freeway oper"atiam- ramps require a special traffic operations analysis. For freeway ramps, the maximum peak hour V/C is 1.00. C I( 1' �` F 11 iA l (� i l l L. : A C, L: N E R. : A L. P L: A N EXHIBIT 4 J , regulations apply to all new developments and may be applied to current uses that are modified or expanded. There is currently adequate on -street parking in the Old Town area. However, there is a need for additional off - street parking to handle peak-period demand. GOALS AND POLICIES t� ROADWAY Roadway congestion is a major concern to local residents and CIRCULATION businesses. The City responds to local concerns regarding roadway congestion through the identification of acceptable perfonnance standards for City roadways and intersections, as well as access points to regional highways, such as I -15. Except as otherwise provided in a specific plan, t The stated performance standard serves as the foundation for providing a street network that moves people and goods safely and efficiently throughout the City while ensuring that traffic delays are kept to a minimum. N Goal l Strive to maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at intersections within the City during peak hours and Level of Service "C" or better during non- peak hours. Policy 1.1 Use the Circulation Element Roadway Plan to guide detailed planning and implementation of the City's roadway system, including appropriate road width and median transitions when a roadway classification changes. Policy 1.2 Pursue trip reduction and transportation systems management measures to reduce and limit congestion at intersections and along streets within the City. Policy 1.3 Actively monitor the capacity of principal intersections throughout the City. Policy 1.4 When Principal Intersections exceed LOS "D" during peak hours, or LOS "C" during off -peak hours, consider elevating the priority of CIP projects that reduce traffic congestion in these areas. �.: 3U EXHIBIT 4 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS C This Implementation Program provides actions to implement the I adopted policies and plans of the Circulation Element. C Prioritize, secure funding, design and build new roadways and ROADWAY P LAN complete roadway improvements using the established Capital Improvement Program process to implement the circulation system shown on the Roadway Plan (Figure G2). Future roadways must meet roadway classification design specifications and performance criteria. Agency /Department: Public Works, Planning �a Related Policies: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2 Required by General Plan EIR O C -2 Maintain and repair City streets on an ongoing basis to ensure ROADWAY roadways and intersections continue to function safely and efficiently. MAINTENANCE Agency /Department: Public Works, Planning Related Policy. 1.3 C -3 Except as otherwise provided in a specific plan, a As traffic I NTERSECTION approaches the LOS standards established in the Circulation MONITORING Element, roadway capacity will be improved by restricting on -street parking, improving signal timing, widening intersections, adding through and turn lanes, and other transportation systems management measures. Monitor the performance of Principal Intersections on an ongoing basis. Ensure that Principal Intersections approaching Level of Service D are prioritized for improvement within the City's Capital Improvement Program. Agency /Department: Public Works, Planning Related Policies: 1.3, 1.4, 3.1 Required by General Plan EIR C Y O F ( ( =. ,A�1 I� C 11 L ;A C E (- R A L I' L A N