HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-93 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 92-93
A I~le. qOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 3 AMENDING
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219 TO ADD AN EIGHT ACRE PARK TO
PLANNING AREA 6, TO MAKE THE SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENT
WITH THE EAST SIDE MAPS AND TO MAKE ALL THE SECTIONS OF
THE SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENT WITH EACH OTHER AND
LOCATED TO THE SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, NORTH OF STATE
HIGHWAY 79, WEST OF B~LD STAGE ROAD AND EAST OF
MARGARITA ROAD.
WHEREAS, Bedford Development Corporation filed Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No. 3 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Specific Plan Amendment application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Specific Plan Amendment on
November 16, 1992 at which time interested persons had an oppommity to testify either in support
or opposition;
~, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended
approval of said Specific Plan Amendment;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Specific Plan
Amendment on December 8, 1992, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition to said Specific Plan Amendment;
WBEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding the Specific Plan Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE~iECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Re~o92-93 -1-
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt
a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period
of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed
will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area Community
Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General
Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries
of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the
City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The City Council in approving the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, makes the
following finding, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No. 3 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a
reasonable time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact that the subject request is
consistent with the SWAP Designation of Specific Plan and is in substantial conformance with
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 2.
with the future
There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
General Plan, if Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 is ultimately
Reso92-93 -2-
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that approval of such an amendment will ensure orderly
development of the area and the significant environmental impacts have been mitigated.
3. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses of schools and single
family residential since it is separated by wide streets with substantial landscaping to reduce the
visual impacts and other impacts have been reduced to a level of insignificance.
4. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed land use is consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No. 2.
5. The project will have a positive impact on the surrounding land uses since
it is introducing an additional new park to the area.
6. The changes proposed in the approved Specific Plan are very minor and do
not change the total number of units or the overall intensity of the development.
A. The Specific Plan Amendment is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of
the community.
Section 2. Environmental Contp!iance. An Addendum has been prepared for this
project which identified no additional impacts as a result of the changes in the project. Therefore,
staff has recommended Certification of the Addendum to EIR No. 235.
Section 3. Conditions. Not applicable.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 1992.
~P~ia H. Bir~or
ATTEST:
[SEAL]
Rcao92-93 -3-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of December, 1992 by
the roll call vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts, Stone, Parks, Mufioz
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
R~ao92-93 -4-