Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-067 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 94-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMIgSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 93-0157, A CONDmONAL USE PERMIT, TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TRANSPORTATION, ADMINISTRATION AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY FOR THE TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Councilman Mufioz filed an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to certify the Environmental Impact Report (Planning Application No. 94-0002) for Planning Application No. 93-0157 and to approve Planning Application No. 93-0157 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on June 14, 1994, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Appeal; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T!J34ECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. findings: Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following Ao to wit: The City Council in denying the Appeal, makes the following additional timings, 1. The land use or action proposed is consistent with the General Plan. The land use designation for the site is identified in the General Plan as BP (Business Park) which encourages uses such as: light manufacturing, research and development, wholesale business, professional offices, storage and industrial supply. 2. The provisions contained in Ordinance No. 348 allow for construction and operation of this project provided that a conditional use permit is granted. Re~o~ 94-67 I 3. The proposed use or action complies with all other requirements of state law and local ordinances. The proposed use complies with California Governmental Code Section 65360 and Section 18.28 (Conditional Use Permit) of Ordinance No. 348. 4. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of the community. In addition, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for this project mitigates all significant impacts of the proposed project to an insignificant level with the exception of Hydrology, Seismic Safety, Air Quality and Land Use impacts for which Statements of Overriding Considerations have been prepared. Mitigation measures have been included in the Conditions of Approval. 5. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, access, and intensity of use, because the proposed planning application (conditional use permit), as conditioned, complies with the standards contained within the City's General Plan and Ordinance No. 348. 6. The project has acceptable access to easement which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. a publicly maintained road (Margarita Road). a dedicated right-of-way via an Access to the project site is from 7. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. 8. Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. The proposed action is consistent with the City's General Plan. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An initial study was completed for the project by Planning staff which indicated that there would be potentially significant impacts with the development of the project. Consequently, staff determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be necessary for the project. Environmental Impact Report No. 94-0002 was prepared by the applicant's consultant, Douglas Wood and Associates, Inc. and was reviewed by City staff. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the significance of all the impacts and proposed mitigation measures included in the final EIR that reduced these impacts to an insignificant level with the exception of Seismic Safety, Climate and Air Quality, Hydrology and Land Use for which Findings of Fact and Statements of Overriding Considerations have been included within the final E~R. Therefore, the City of Temecula Certifies the Final Environmental Impact Report (PA 94-0002) which includes the Draft EIR , the Response to Comments, the Mitigation Monitoring Program, Findings of Fact and Statements of overriding Considerations, the Staff Report and any associated attachments, and finds that it has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Re~ 94-67 2 Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of June, 1994. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor lu r' r k, City lerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of June, 1994 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Stone, Roberts NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz, Parks R~o~ 94-67 3