HomeMy WebLinkAbout100791 PC MinutesM~NUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE C~TY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMiSSiON
MONDAY, OCTOBER 7, 1991
A regular meeting of the city of Temecula Planning Commission was
called to order Monday, October 7, 1991, 6:10 P.M., at Vail
Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California.
The meeting was called to order by Chairman John E. Hoagland.
PRESENT: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Ford, Chiniaeff
Hoagland
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey
Also present were Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Planning
Director Gary Thornhill, Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske, Deputy City
Engineer Doug Stewart, Robert Righetti, Department of Public Works,
Gary King, Park Development Coordinator, and Minute Clerk Gail
Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
CHAIRMAN HOAGL~ND advised that the applicant requests to
continue Item No. 3, and that Item No. 13, be moved to
the beginning of the agenda. GARY THORNHILL suggested
that Item No. 13 be heard upon the arrival of the City
Attorney John Cavanaugh.
COMMISSIONER FORD moved to approve the agenda with Item
No. 13 taken out of order and presented upon the arrival
of the City Attorney, seconded by COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF.
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford,
Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey
COMMISSIONER FAHEY arrived at 6:15 P.M.
TPCMIN10/07/91 -1- OCTOBER 11, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 07, 1991
MINUTES
2.1 Approval of minutes of September 16, 1991 Planning
Commission Meeting.
COMMISSIONER FORD amended the minutes as follows:
Page 7, prior to motion, add paragraph to read,
"Due to the fact that the zone change and adoption of the
Negative Declaration of the E.I.R. and approval thereof
occurred several months prior to this action, the previous
motion was brought back for reconsideration."; Page 18,
statement by Robert Kemble, correct to read" .... Paloma
Del Sol development up stream."
COMMISSIONER FAHEY amended Page 18 and 19, spelling
corrected from "ridgeling" to "ridgeline".
COMMISSIONER BLAIR amended Page 8, under her comments,
" ..... densities in the area without allowing for adequate
park lands within the total project.".
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF moved to approve the minutes of
September 16, 1991 as amended, seconded by COMMISSIONER
FAHEY.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
TELEVISION/RADIO ANTENNA ORDINANCE
3.1 Proposal for an ordinance establishing regulations for
Television/Radio Antennas, city wide.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to continue Item No. 3,
Television/Radio Antenna Ordinance to the meeting of
October 21, 1991, seconded by COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
TPCMIN10/07/91 -2- OCTOBER 11, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
13. CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 18; and SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219
13.1 Proposal to amend the boundary of the Paloma Del Sol
Specific Plan to include planning area No. 36. Located
at the southeast corner of Margarita Road and DePortola
Road.
GARY THORNHILL advised that this item was continued due
to the concern that the Homeowner's contention was that
the CC&R provisions limited the use of the property to
residential.
JOHN CAVANAUGH stated that the City Attorney's office was
directed to research the apparent conflict between the
proposed zone change and the CC&R's that regulate the
land use. Mr. Cavanaugh advised that zone changes are
legislative acts authorized by the California Constitution
and state government codes. These statutes, as well as
the Constitution, grant specific authority to the local
agencies under their police power to enact local land use
regulations as long as they don't conflict with the
general law of the state. The City will prevail on it's
zoning decision when the City Council decides to zone or
re-zone any property. The CC&R's are in essence deed
restrictions between land owners. The covenants of the
CC&R's are ineffective as to the City. The CC&R's to the
extent they conflict with the proposed zone change, will
be ineffective.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY questioned if the Commission could
base their decision on the zone change as to it's effect
on the community.
JOHN CAVANAUGH stated yes, the only constant fact is that
this zone change will be consistent with the future
general plan.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF questioned if the applicant was
asking for additional commercial, could the Commission
request additional park land.
JOHN CAVANAUGH based on the overall effect to the
specific plan, you could make the determination that
there is a requirement for additional park land, and
make that recommendation to the City Council.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 6:30 P.M.
F.H. TAYLOR, 31531 Pio Pico Road, Temecula, stated that
the Los Ranchitos CC&R's restricted commercial activities
TPCMIN10/07/91 -3- 10/08/91
PLANNTNG COMMISSION MINUTES
OCTOBER 7, 1991
and opposed the change of zone. He added that he did not
agree with mixing commercial development with residential.
JO~ MORAMARCO, P.O. Box 906, Temecula, representing the
Los Ranchitos Homeowner's Association, requested that the
Commission delay their decision for 30 days to allow the
homeowners time to meet with the applicant and to discuss
the CC&R's.
Because the applicant was not present, C~AIRMA~ HOAGI~%ND
suggested postponing the item to later in the evening.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF moved to continue Change of Zone
No. 18 and Specific Plan No. 219 to 7:30 P.M. to allow
for additional testimony, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
4. EXPAND OLD TOWN HISTORICAL DISTRICT BOUNDARY
4.1
Proposal to expand Old Town Historical District Boundary.
Located in the Old Town District, generally located
between Murrieta Creek, between 2nd and 6th Streets.
JOHN MEYER presented the staff report.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF expressed a concern that the
expansion should not delay the improvements to the
Murrieta Creek.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 6:50 P.M.
BILL PERRY, 28677 Front Street, Temecula, stated that his
opposition is because he felt that the city was missing
the target area and would endorse expansion if the
boundaries include Pujol Street, Town Association Center
and area south to Hwy 79/Hwy 15.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR stated that she agreed with the
decision to increase the boundaries and added that she
would be willing to consider the boundaries expanded
further as suggested by Mr. Perry.
TPCMIN10/07/91 -4- 10/08/91
PL~qNING COI~ISSION HINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF moved to close the public hearing
at 7:00 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next)
recommending approval of Change of Zone No. 19, amending
the staff recommendation to expand the historic boundary
to extend north to Rancho California Road including all
four quadrants of the intersection, west to the backside
of the lots that front Pujol, and south along the west
side of Front Street, to Hwy 79/Hwy 15, seconded by
COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND advised that the City of Murrieta was requesting
that Items 9, 10, 11 & 12 be continued to allow their staff to
confer with the city of Temecula staff regarding circulation
impacts.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 7:05 P.M. on Items
No. 9, No. 10, No. 11 and No. 12.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF stepped down on these items due to a
conflict of interest.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to continue Items No. 9, No. 10, No. 11
and No. 12 to the regularly scheduled meeting of October 21, 1991,
seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN:i COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
e
CHANGE OF gONE NO. 17 AND FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23125
5.1
Proposal to change the zoning on 88.4 acres from R-A-2-1/2
to R-1 and R-5; and subdivide 88.4 acres into 215 single
family residential lots. Located at the northeast corner
of DePortola and Butterfield Stage Road.
RICHARD AYALA provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN HOAGL~ND opened the public hearing at 7:15 P.M.
TPCMIN10/07/91 -5- 10/08/91
PL2~NNING CONNISS~ON N~NUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
DAVID JAMES, RanPac Engineering, 27447 Enterprise Circle
West, Temecula, indicated concurrence to the staff report
and the Conditions of Approval.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND advised the applicant that staff had
modified Condition 29, first sentence, to read "Prior
to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall
offer for dedication".
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing at
7:15 P.M. and recommend to the City Council Acceptance of
Environmental Impact Report No. 263 for Change of Zone No.
17 and First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23125; Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next) recommending
approval of Change of Zone No. 17 and AdoDt Resolution
No. 91-(next) recommending approval of First Extension of
Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125.
The motion failed due to lack of second.
COMMISSIONER FORD expressed concerns for the following:
that the Commission is relying on old county documents
in regards to the HOA, referring to dormant; Conditions 10
and 11 were deleted and Commissioner Ford felt they should
remain; and what improvements will be done to Area C, open
space.
GARY KING stated that Conditions 10 and 11 were deleted
because it is an automatic when the tracts are conditioned
through DRC, that TCSD goes into an agreement with the
applicant for dedication of the slopes.
GARY THORNHILL advised that the applicant has approved
CC&R's with the City Attorney that requires an active HOA.
Mr. Thornhill suggested modifying Condition 29 to read
" ..... land, and execute an agreement with TCSD to improve
the proposed 2.75 acre property in accordance with TCSD
standards at the time of execution."
COMMISSIONER FORD suggested that Condition 25 be modified
with the same language as above.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing at
7:25 P.M. and recommend to the City Council Acceptance of
Environmental Impact Report No. 263 for Change of Zone No.
17 and First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23125; Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next) recommending
approval of Change of Zone No. 17 and Adopt Resolution
No. 91-(next) recommending approval of First Extension of
TPCMIN10/07/91 -6- 10/08/91
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125, seconded
by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey,
Ford,
NOES: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND declared a five minute recess.
reconvened at 7:30 P.M.
The meeting
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND opened the public hearing on Item No. 13.
The applicant requested that the item be postponed to later in the
public hearing to allow for his consultant to arrive.
6. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25892
6.1
Proposal to sub-divide 20 acres into 34 single family
residential lots. Located on the south side of Pauba Road
between Ynez and Margarita Roads.
CHARLES RAY provided the staff report.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 7:40
P.M.
RICHARD MASYCZEH, 25262 Madtone, Murrieta, representing
the applicant, concurred with the staff report; however,
expressed a concern with Condition 49 requiring that
CC&R's be provided to maintain slopes and common open
space. He stated that there were some common drainage
areas, which the applicant was requesting TCSD maintain.
Mr. Masyczeh requested deleting Condition 49 and replace
with a condition that TCSD maintain the drainage areas
and that adequate warning be given to the property owners
for the maintenance of these areas.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND asked if TCSD would be interested in
maintaining these drainage areas.
GARY KING advised that the TCSD was not interested in the
applicants request to amend Condition 49.
DAVE ASMUS, 40521 Calle Cansione, Temecula, spoke in favor
of the request.
RALPH NAVARRO, 30418 Colina Verde, Temecula, spoke in
favor of the request.
TPCMIN10/07/91 -7- 10/08/91
PLANNING CONNISS~ON N~NUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
NOEL PAINE, 30222 Corte Cantero, Temecula, spoke in favor
of the request.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF stated that he felt there were some
design issues that needed to be addressed before
approving the request.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND stated that he would find it
inappropriate to approve this map as part of an area that
looks like approximately 220 acres with no coordinated
circulation pattern. He stated that he felt that the
developments should follow a circulation plan for the
entire area.
COMMISSIONER FORD stated that he felt the topography
should also be looked at based on the fact that the
project bisects a natural drainage course.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR stated that she would feel more
comfortable addressing this plan in areas such as this, in
keeping with the general plan.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF moved to close the public hearing at
8:00 P.M. and continue off calendar Tentative Tract Map
No. 25892, to allow the applicant to work with staff and
address the issue of maintenance of large slopes along the
creek, coordination of a drainage plan for this area, the
coordination of a circulation plan for this property and
properties between Santiago and Pauba Roads, and amount
of major slopes and pad sizes related to the project
setting a minimum size for a pad, using 10,000 as a
reasonable pad to lot size (specifically looking at Lot 2)
seconded by CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND for discussion.
DOUG STEWART questioned if the Commission was requesting
that the applicant redesign the drainage plan.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF suggested that staff work with the
applicant to see that the drainage flows in that area.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY stated that due to the fact that the
Commission has expressed a number of concerns regarding
this project, which appears to be in conflict with the
future general plan, she would not be in favor of a
continuation at this time.
TPCMIN10/07/91 -8- 10/08/91
PLANNING CONMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND stated that until there is a general
plan that clearly delineates what the City is going to
do, he cannot support going forward with this project.
AYES: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford
NOES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to deny Tentative Tract Map No.
25892 based on the probable inconsistency with the
future general plan, seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR.
JOHN CAVANAUGH requested more specific findings on the
probably inconsistencies.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY outlined circulation, land use, grading
and drainage.
AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland
NOES: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND clarified that the motion was a
recommendation to the City Council.
7. PARCEL MAP NO. 25059 MINOR CHANGE NO. i
7.1
Proposal to modify or delete engineering conditions.
Project located at Ridge Park Drive, south west side
approximately 70 feet east of its intersection with
Rancho California Road.
RICHARD AYALA provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 8:10 P.M.
ANTHONY POLO, Avalon Consultants, P.O. Box 2497, Temecula,
representing the applicant, concurred with the staff
report.
COMMISSIONER FORD questioned if the language in Conditions
40, 41 and 45 shouldn't read "as necessary" rather than
"as warranted".
ROBERT RIGHETTI stated that staff would be relying on
traffic studies for justification of the traffic signals
and the proper terminology is "as warranted".
TPCMIN10/07/91 -9- 10/08/91
PL~'NING COI~ISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF expressed a concern for the
transportation conditions indicating that prior to
recordation the applicant will get credit for the
mitigation fee and contributing 46% of the construction
costs and entering into a reimbursement agreement;
however, they are building them.
ROBERT RIGHETTI stated that Condition 39, credit given
toward signal mitigation fee, is being deleted and the
conditions outlined are taking the previous conditions
and revising them.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF moved to close the public hearing
at 8:15 P.M. and Deny Minor Change No. 1 for Parcel Map
No. 25059 and Approve Parcel Map No. 25059 Minor Change
No. 1, subject to the modification and deletion of
Conditions of Approval for Parcel Map No. 25059, seconded
by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
8. PLOT PLAN NO. 239 - RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
8.1
Proposal to construct three structures to house Rancho
California Water District Headquarters functions as
follows: 2 story office at 40,000 square feet; warehouse
at 13,000 square feet and an Operations Building at
20,000 square feet. Located northwesterly of the
intersection of Diaz Road and Rio Nedo.
CHARLES RAY provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 8:25 P.M.
JOHN HERBERT, 28061 Diaz Road, Temecula, concurred with
the staff report. Mr. Herbert requested clarification of
the following Conditions: Item 20, project is not subject
to the Fish and Game review and therefore should not
be subject to the fees; Item 15, applicant stated they did
not have the funds to place all specimen trees in the
project; and regarding Conditions 16, 33, 40 and 42,
developer has paid these fees already.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND suggested modifying the first
engineering condition to reflect "...at no cost to the
City."
TPCMIN10/07/91 -10- 10/08/91
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
DOUG STEWART concurred with the amendment.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND suggested that the requirement for this
fee be mitigated.
MIKE GRAY advised that this was a standard fee on all
buildings in the City and there is no proposal for
deferment of the fee.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND questioned if Mr. Gray would be adverse
to deleting Condition 54 which was a duplicate of
Condition 52.
MIKE GRAY concurred with the recommendation.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY requested clarification on Condition
20.
JOHN CAVANAUGH advised that this was a state mandated fee
and the applicant can file a deminimous exemption.
DAN GILLISS, 193 Hartford Drive, Newport Beach, answered
questions regarding the proposed gas pumps that were
referenced in the plans.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY suggested clarifying what the
Commission wanted to see in the way of trees.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF stated that he felt 24" box trees
were appropriate, particularly along Diaz Road.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing
at 8:35 P.M. and recommend Adoption of the Negative
Declaration for Plot Plan No. 239 and Adopt Resolution
91-(next) approving Plot Plan No. 239, modifying Condition
No. 15 to specify 24" box trees, No. 20, language to
reflect whether or not the applicant must pay the fees,
No. 54 deleted and top of page 20, to read "...at no cost
to the City.", seconded by COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
9. PARCEL MAP 24085
9.1 Proposal to create 57 commercial/industrial parcel on a
73 acre site in M-SC zone. Located on the westerly side
TPCMIN10/07/91 -11- 10/08/91
PL~qNING COI~.fISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
of Diaz Road, north of the future extension of Winchester
Road.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 7:05
P.M.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to continue Parcel Map 24085 to
October 21, 1991, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN:I COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
10. PARCEL MAP 24086
10.1 Proposal to create 49 commercial/industrial parcels on a
70 acre site in M-SC zone. Located on the westerly side
of Diaz Road, north of the future extension of Winchester
Road.
CHAIRMAN HOAGL~D opened the public hearing at.7:05
P.M.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to continue Parcel Map 24086 to
October 21, 1991, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN:I COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
11. PARCEL MAP 25139
11.1 Proposal to create 66 commercial/industrial parcels on a
97 acre site in M-SC zone. Located west of Diaz Road and
south of Cherry Street.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 7:05
P.M.
TPCMIN10/07/91 -12- 10/08/91
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
COMMISSIONER BL&IR moved to continue Parcel Map 25139 to
October 21, 1991, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN:i COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
12. PARCEL MAP 25408
12.1 Proposal to create 20 commercial/industrial parcels on a
36 acre site in M-SC zone. Located southwesterly of
future extension of Winchester Road.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 7:05
P.M.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to continue Parcel Map 25408 to
October 21, 1991, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN:I COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND re-opened the public hearing on Item No. 13 at
8:40 P.M.
KEITH McCANN JR., 43121 Margarita, Temecula, applicant,
advised that after communication with the City Attorney's
office, he has been advised that the enforcement of the
CC&R's and release thereof is a civil matter to be
addressed by the property owner and the Homeowner's
Association. Mr. McCann stated that it was a concern
of the HOA that being released from the CC&R's would set
some sort of precedent; the CC&R's provide for this with
the requirement of 51% approval of the homeowners.
BARRY BERNELL, 3242 Haliday Street, Santa Ana,
representing the applicant, explained the request for
changing the designation of this property. Mr. Bernell
advised that the original expectation of the area was
large lots, very rural; however, in 1980 the county
TPCMZNL0/07/gx -13- 10/08/g~
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, L991
approved a Specific Plan on this property and we proposed
residential development; however, subsequent to that SWAP
was approved designating commercial uses across the street
at the northwest corner of Margarita and Highway 79.
Bedford Properties processed an amendment to change their
corner to commercial leaving this property.
IRIS ABERNATHY, Margarita Road, Temecula, spoke in favor
of the request and requested that the Commission consider
approval of a zone change to her property as well.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the
request:
DON ROHRABACHER, 44281 Flores Drive, Temecula. Mr.
Rohrabacher clarified that the applicant would need
approval from 51% of the acreage not homeowners.
JOHN PEPE, 28980 Vallejo, Temecula.
NAYREE DAVIS, 28895 Vallejo, Temecula.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF asked what the official decision of the
Homeowner's Association was.
NAYREE DAVIS stated that the official decision would be
denial; however, at the minimum, the Association would
request the Commission delay their decision to allow them
the opportunity to discuss the project with Mr. McCann.
KEITH McCANN advised the Commission that he had been
contacted by various members of the Board requesting
some sort of compensation for approval of his request.
Mr. McCann also stated that he attended the public hearing
when the 40 acre retail site was approved and no other
homeowners were present from the Los Ranchitos
Association. Mr. McCann added that his project would
not have the impact that the 40 acre site will.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY stated that she was not in favor of
approval because she felt that overriding the CC&R's
would be setting a precedent.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF stated that putting 2 1/2 acres of
residential in commercial was not good planning and stated
that he would be in favor of approving proposal and
letting the City Council make the final decision.
TPCHIN$0/07/91 -14- 10/08/91
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND stated that he felt the issue was one
that needed to be resolved between the land owner and the
Association.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR stated that she would not be in favor
of the zone change until the general plan is complete.
COMMISSIONER FORD stated that he would like to see both
property owners meet and try to resolve their differences
and provide written proof of a resolution.
COMMISSIONER FORD moved to close the public hearing at
9:20 P.M. and send Change of Zone No. 18 and Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 2 back to staff to allow
the property owners to work out some sort of resolution,
seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
14. PLOT PLAN 240
14.1 Proposal to construct a 6,300 square foot restaurant on
an approved building pad location on the site of Plot
Plan 18 revised. Located on the northwest corner of
Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane.
CHARLES RAY provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 9:25 P.M.
DANA BRUNANSKY, 98 Executive Circle, Suite 190, Irvine,
representing the applicant, Red Robin International,
concurred with the staff report.
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF requested that the applicant work
with staff on enhancing the landscaping along the Lyndie
Lane frontage.
FRED GRIMES, 41530 Enterprise Circle, Temecula, answered
questions regarding the other tenants in the proposed
project.
TPCMIN10/07/91 -15- 10/08/91
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 1991
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to close the public hearing at
9:30 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next) approving
Plot Plan No. 240, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey,
Ford, Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PLkNNING DIRECTOR REPORT
GARY THORNHILL reminded the Commissioners that the meeting was
adjourning to a joint meeting with the Temecula City Council on
Thursday, October 10, 1991, 7:00 P.M., at Temecula City Hall.
MIKE GRAY, County Fire Department, advised the Commissioners that
according to the City Ordinance, oil is rated as a Class i liquid
and must be stored in the tanks as described in Item 9, Rancho
California Water District.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
None
OTHER BUSINESS
None
ADJOURNMENT
COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF moved to adjourn at 9:35 P.M., seconded by
COMMISSIONER FORD and carried unanimously.
A special meeting will be held between the City of Temecula
Planning Commission and the City Council, Thursday, October 10,
1991, 7:00 P.M., at Temecula City Hall, 43174 Business Park Drive,
Temecula.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning
Commission will be held on Monday, October 21, 1991, 6:00 P.M., at
Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula.
gl~and~~Xrman~~
TPCMIN10/07/91 -16- 10/08/91