Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout111692 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1992 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order Monday, November 16, 1992, 6:10 P.M., 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California, Chairman Linda Fahey presiding. PRESENT: 3 ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Hoagland, Fahey COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff Also present were City Attorney Scott Field, Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske, Planner Saied Naaseh and Minute Clerk Gail Ziglet. PUBLIC COMMENTS None COMMISSION BUSINESS Approval of Agenda It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Ford to approve the agenda. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Hoagland, Fahey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff Commissioner Blair arrived at 6:13 P.M. 2. Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Ford, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to continue approval of the minutes of October 19, 1992 to allow staff time to address the Commission's concerns regarding lack of dialogue which the Commission feels is important to the approval of the General Plan. PCMIN11/16/92 -1- 11/31/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: NOVEMBER 16, 1992 Blair, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey None Chiniaeff Transportation Demand Manaaement/Air Quality Ordinance Director of Public Works Tim Serlet presented the staff report. Tim stated that Jim Birckhead, Program Coordinator of the Air Quality Coordinating Committee, advised him that Section 7 of the Ordinance was rejected by the Air Quality Management District and new language was implemented as follows, "Section 7 - Compliance With AQMD Regulation 15: Trip reduction plans approved by the SCAQMD in accordance with provisions of Regulation 15 may be submitted to the City in lieu of plans required under the provisions of this ordinance. AQMD approved Regulation 15 trip reduction plans approved by the City shall be deemed to comply with trip reduction plan requirements of this ordinance." Jim Birckhead, Program Director for the Western Riverside Council of Governments, provided an overview of the Air Quality Implementation Program. Commissioner Hoagland made the following comments on the model ordinance: Section 1 (b) - He feels it does not make sense. Section 1 (c) - Requested clarification of mobile sources. Section 1 (f) Suggested a reference to business developments. Section 3 (a) - Should refer to 4/10 or 9/80 work schedules as examples. Section 3 (b) - Questioned why existing developments are not in the findings. Jim Birckhead advised that new development is addressed in the CMP provisions and the existing came out of the Air Quality Management Plan. Section 5 (a) - Does that refer to 100 or more persons at one site or within one company. Jim Birckhead stated that the reference was to 100 people at one site. Commissioner Hoagland expressed a concern regarding fees. PCMIN 11/16/92 -2- 11/31/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1992 Chairman Fahey suggested that the fee be incorporated in the business license fee. Commissioner Blair asked for clarification of Section 4 (c). Tim Serlet advised that the intent is to allow for 75% of the required parking and the other 25% would have to utilize some other form of transportation (i.e. carpools, etc.). It was moved by Commissioner Ford, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to recommended the ordinance be re-written per the Planning Commission comments as follows: Clarify "congestion" or "traffic congestion" as detrimental. - Section 1 (c) Definition of mobile sources. Section 3 (a) Alternate work schedules be used as examples and others may be considered. Page 3, 4 (a) Clarification of 100 or more persons per site. Page 5, No. 4 - clarify how the designation applies to employee parking area Clarification of fee and how the fee is determined. Substitute Section 7, "Compliance with AQMD". The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that staff bring this item back before the Commission on December 7, 1992 for review of changes. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Development Agreement No. 92-0013, Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3, Vesting Tentative Tract Maps: No. 24182, Amendment No. 3, 1st Extension of Time No. 24184, Amendment No. 3, 1st Extension of Time PCMIN 11/16192 -3- 11/31/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1992 No. 24185, Amendment No. 3, 1st Extension of Time No. 24186, Amendment No. 5, 1st Extension of Time No. 24187, Amendment No. 3, 1st Extension of Time No. 24188, Amendment No. 3, 1st Extension of Time Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 235 Saied Naaseh presented the staff report. Scott Field advised on Page 27, Section 12.2, fourth line down, of the Development Agreement should read "...the cost incurred by owner for both of said parks...". Saied Naaseh advised of the following revisions to the Conditions of Approval: Vesting Tentative Tract Maps No. 24182: Condition 36 and Conditions Eliminated 38 combined. 47, 50 and 6(A.) modified per staff. statement between Condition 7 and Condition 8. No. 24184: Condition 36 and Conditions Eliminated 38 combined. 47, 50 and 6(A.) modified per staff. statement between Condition 7 and Condition 8. No. 24185: Condition 37 and 39 combined. Conditions 48, 51 and 6(A.) modified per staff. Eliminated statement between Condition 7 and Condition 8. Delete Condition No. 19. No. 24186: Condition 31 and 33 combined. Conditions 42, 45 and 6(A.) modified per staff. Eliminated statement between Condition 7 and Condition 8. Add Condition No. 48. No. 24187: Condition 30 and 32 combined. Conditions 41,43.n. and 6(A.) modified per staff. Eliminate the statement between Condition 7 and Condition 8. Amend Condition No. 14. No. 24188: Condition 45 and 47 combined. Conditions 56, 59 and 6(C) modified per staff. Add Condition 63. Amend Condition No. 6(A). Eliminate the statement between Condition 7 and Condition 8. PCMIN 11/16/92 -4- 11/31/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1992 Revisions to the Development Agreement: Modifications to the following: Section 12.6.a, Section 12.8.b.c, Section 12.8.d., Lot 460, Lots 451,452 and 453, Lot 369 and Lot 352. Commissioner Ford expressed concern that there is no reference to specific improvements to the eight (8) acre park-site in the Development Agreement and requested that the requirements be clarified more specifically. Gary King advised that the applicant has been provided with a copy of the Parks Development Standards and in previous meetings, an agreement had been reached as to the improvements that were to be required. Commissioner Blair stated that she feels the language on Page 5, Item U (1) is inappropriate. Scott Field advised the finding can be deleted if the Commission does not agree with it. Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 7:55 P.M. Dennis O'Neil, 18881 Yon Karman, #1600, Irvine, CA, representing Bedford Development Corporation, expressed the applicant's concurrence with the staff report. Mr. O'Neil expressed that the applicant would agree to include a statement referencing the improvements to the eight (8) acre park site with the understanding that there may be further modifications as it goes through the review process. Mr. O'Neil expressed objection to the reference to Ordinance 460 in Section 12.6.a of the Development Agreement. Mr. O'Neil suggested that the condition be modified to read "developer will provide reasonable and primary and secondary access and drainage from De Portola and Campanula Way, subject to the approval of the City, and in accordance with reasonable standards". LeAnne Hamilton, 29845 Avertida Cima Del Sol, Temecula, expressed concern that staff look at adequate lighting, bike trails, storm water drainage and traffic safety in this area. Commissioner Hoagland stated he feels the density in Planning Area 6 is inappropriate and out of character for the City of Temecula and suggested that it remain 15.6 dwelling units per acre. Commissioner Ford concurred and suggested that the Commission not take action on the Development Agreement until each map has been reviewed. Chairman Fahey declared a recess at 8:20 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 8:35 P.M. PCMIN11/16/92 -5- 11/31/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 16. 1992 Commissioner Ford recommended the following modification to the Specific Plan Amendment, Page 5 of the staff report, second to last sentence "The addition of the park is a positive amenity to the area however, this addition may cause a higher density in planning area six...". Commissioner Hoagland stated that he could not support Finding 1 of the Specific Plan Amendment, which he feels is premature. Commissioner Hoagland added that regarding the language and changes related to densities, he would like to see the Planning Area Six target remain 15.6. Barry Brunnell, Turrini and Brink, 3242 Holliday Street, Santa Ana, provided information regarding the paseos. Mr. Brunnell stated that the densities in Planning Area 6 are consistent with Recital K (page 3 of the Development Agreement). Mr. Brunnell added that before any construction takes place in this Planning Area it will need to be reviewed and approved by the City. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Blair to change the Specific Plan Amendment to reflect a target density of 15.6 in Planning Area 6. AYES: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Hoagland NOES: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Fahey ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff Commissioner Ford stated that the developer will have to show that the proposed density can be applied to the site by submittal of proper plans and open space amenities. Commissioner Hoagland stated that he feels the applicant's proposed density for Planning Area 6 is too dense for a very suburban, almost rural area. Commissioner Blair stated that she feels it is unfair to say one thing to the developer at a hearing and change directions when they come back to the Commission. It was moved by Commissioner Ford, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve all other changes to the Specific Plan reflected in the Amendment. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff PCMIN 11/16/92 -6- 11/31/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1992 Commissioner Ford recommended the following modifications to the Extension of Time on: Vestin(~ Tentative Tract MaD No. 24182 Page 21, #9 Page 24, #38 Page 26, #55 Page 26, #57(A)- "Provisions" changed to "provisions". New condition corrected to read planting". Referenced in 57 (A), delete. "should maintain" changed to "shall maintain" "erosion control #57(B)- Page 27, #67 Page 28, #70 #74 #75 Page 30, #86 Page 30, #88 Modified to state "constructed to maintain interior noise levels at 45 dBA.." - State which parks are to be or could be accepted for maintenance by the TCSD. - Delete condition or delete "shall" and change to read "...may be maintained...". "will preclude" changed to "may preclude". Street and parkway landscape bonds should be kept separate. - Amend to read "or other devices as approved". - Add in all other appropriate agencies. Robert Righetti, Senior Project Manager, land development, advised that the Conditions are staged so that the appropriate agencies are notified. Barry Brunnell stated that the applicant would concur with the modifications, however would request that Condition 88 remain as written. Commissioner Ford suggested that #139 on Page 36 be deleted. City Attorney Scott Field concurred. Commissioner Blair excused herself at 9:30 P.M. PCMIN 11/16/92 -7- 11/31/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1992 Vestin(; Tentative Tract Mao No. 24184 Commissioner Ford recommended the same changes above to the following Conditions: 9, 38, 62, 65, 69, 70, 81, and 132 in addition to the following: Page 40, #8 Add "parkways" after "open space,". Page 40, #10 Delete. Vesting Tentative Tract MaD No. 24185 Commissioner Ford recommended the same changes as referenced for Map 24182 to the following Conditions: 9, 38, 63, 66, 70, 71, 82, and 135 with no other modifications. Vestinq Tentative Tract MaD No. 24186 Commissioner Ford recommended the same changes as referenced for Map 24182 to the following Conditions: 9, 33, 57, 60, 64, 65, 76, and 126 with no other modifications. Vestin(; Tentative Tract Ma~ No. 24187 Commissioner Ford recommended the same changes as referenced for Map 24182 to the following Conditions: 9, 32, 53, 56, 60, 61, 72, and 121 with no other modifications. Vestin(; Tentative Tract MaD No. 24188 Commissioner Ford recommended the same changes as referenced for Map 24182 to the following Conditions: 9, 47, 72, 75, 79, 80, 91, and 145 with no other modifications. Barry Brunnell expressed concurrence with the modifications to the Vesting Tentative Tract Maps on behalf of the applicant. PCMIN 11/16/92 -8- 11/31/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1992 A straw vote was taken and the consensus of the Commission was to approve the Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 235. A straw vote was taken and the consensus of the Commission was to approve the Vesting Tentative Tract Maps, 1st Extensions of Time with modifications. Commissioner Ford recommended the following modification to Item U (1) on Page 5 of the Development Agreement, "The opportunity for a residential/commercial project creating job opportunities, sales tax and tax revenues to the City", to address the Commissioner Blair's concerns. Dennis O'Neil, representing the applicant, advised they would agree to include language in the Development Agreement to describe the improvements to the eight (8) acre park site as the conceptual plan previously submitted to staff as recorded signed copy of listed improvements. Additionally, Mr. O'Neil stated the applicant would agree to the language in 12.6.a. as submitted by staff modified with the following statement "...or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer". Commissioner Hoagland suggested Section 12.1.1., Page 27, be modified by deleting the reference to "590". Dennis O'Neil indicated the applicant's concurrence. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Ford to close the public hearing at 10:00 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 92-037 approving Planning Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement), Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3, The First Extensions of Time For Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24182, Amendment No. 3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24184, Amendment No. 3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24185, Amendment No. 3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24186, Amendment No. 5, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24187, Amendment No. 3, and Certifying the Addemdum to EIR No. 235, with the various changes as reflected in the minutes. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Ford, Hoagland, Fahey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT None PCMIN 11/16/92 -9- 11/31192 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 16, 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT None OTHER BUSINESS None ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Ford to adjourn to a special meeting on November 18, 1992, 6:30 P.M., Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission will be held on Monday, December 7, 1992, 6:00 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Linda, Temecula, CA. Secretary PCMIN11/16/92 -10- 11/31/92