Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout092817 PTS Agenda In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,please contact the office of the City Clerk's Department at 951-694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting[28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] MEETING AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION A REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD AT TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2017, 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Hagel FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Carter ROLL CALL: Carter, Mann, Richardson, Sullivan, Hagel PRESENTATIONS: PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of fifteen minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow"Request to Speak" form may be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak"form may be filed with the Recording Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION REPORTS Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. Action Minutes of August 24, 2017 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of August 24, 2017. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Crosswalk Installation Practice and Policv RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 2.1 Receive and file the report. TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, October 26, 2017, at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet(including staff reports)will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(4 1000 Main Street, Temecula)after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. At that time,the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website—TemeculaCA.gov—and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting, Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda,after the posting of the agenda,will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(4 1000 Main Street,Temecula,8:00 AM—5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed on the City's website—TemeculaCA.gov-will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting,please contact the Public Works Department at the Temecula Civic Center, (951)694-6411. 2 ITEM NO. 1 Action Minutes of August 24, 2017 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, AUGUST 24, 2017, 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Hagel FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Sullivan ROLL CALL: Mann, Richardson, Sullivan, Hagel Absent: Commissioner Carter PRESENTATIONS: None PUBLIC COMMENTS: Bob Hawley (Gerald) Jerry Palmer COMMISSION REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Action Minutes of.lune 22. 2017 - Approved staff recommendation (4-0-1-0) with a motion made by Commissioner Sullivan and seconded by Commissioner Mann. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Hagel, Mann, Richardson and Sullivan; Commissioner Carter was absent. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of June 22, 2017. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2. Consideration of Multi-Wa Sta Si ns-Promenade C hardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux - Approved staff recommendation (4-0-1-0) with a motion made by Commissioner Sullivan and seconded by Commissioner Richardson. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Hagel, Mann, Richardson and Sullivan; Commissioner Carter was absent. RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission. 2.1 Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersection of Promenade Chardonnay Hills at Promenade Bordeaux 3. Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey V date- Approved staff recommendation(4- 0-1-0) with a motion made by Commissioner Richardson and seconded by Commissioner Sullivan. Individual voice vote reflected approval by Commissioners Hagel, Mann, Richardson and Sullivan; Commissioner Carter was absent. RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 3.1 Recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in Exhibit "B". TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, September 28, 2017,at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center,City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Bob Hagel Patrick Thomas Chairperson Director of Public Works/City Engineer 2 ITEM NO. 2 Crosswalk Installation Practice and Policy AGENDA REPORT Of TE . . TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission 1989 H FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer W, DATE: September 28, 2017 SUBJECT: Item 2 Crosswalk Installation Practice and Policy PREPARED BY: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer- Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Receive and file the report. BACKGROUND: In the past the Public/Traffic Safety Commission has received requests to install marked crosswalks at controlled and uncontrolled locations. It has been the City's"practice" to install a marked crosswalk at signalized intersections only and to not install marked crosswalks at stop controlled intersections, unless the stop is adjacent to a school or on a suggested route to school. Additionally, the City's practice has been to not install marked crosswalks at uncontrolled crossings or mid-block locations unless the crossing is adjacent to a school and is controlled by a school crossing guard. The City's practice is reaffirmed by studies conducted on the relative safety of crosswalks,which supports the use of unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled intersections or mid- block locations. The purpose of the proposed policy is to memorialize the City's practice and establish guidelines and procedures for the installation of marked crosswalks at controlled and uncontrolled crossings. The Crosswalk Installation Practice and Policy allows for the installation of a marked crosswalk at controlled crossings such as signalized intersections, multi-way stop intersections, and one or two way stop intersections. At uncontrolled crossings the practice to not install a marked crosswalk will be maintained. However, the policy provides flexibility for the discretionary installation of a marked crosswalk, under certain conditions, and includes the use of electronic flashing devices or high visibility markings and signing. Uncontrolled crossings include intersections, mid-block locations, and unmarked mid-block locations. The Crosswalk Installation Practice and Policy is shown in Exhibit "A". FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. ATTACHMENT: 1. Exhibit "A"—Crosswalk Installation Practice and Policy. EXHIBIT "A" CROSSWALK INSTALLATION PRACTICE AND POLICY 2 CROSSWALK INSTALLATION PRACTICE AND POLICY -- 1989 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines and procedures for the installation of marked crosswalks at controlled crossing and uncontrolled crossings. BACKGROUND The function of a crosswalk is to channelize pedestrians to designated crossing locations which may be the shortest path, a location with the best sight distance, or assist pedestrians across complex intersections. While pedestrians may believe that a marked crosswalk helps drivers to expect where pedestrians may cross, they may also create a "false sense of security" for pedestrians, as no amount of paint or signs can help a pedestrian judge the vehicle's approaching speed or suitable gaps to cross traffic. Therefore, it is desirable to have guidelines for improving pedestrian safety using best practices, innovation, and engineering judgment, while providing uniformity where possible. Controlled Crossings: 1. Signalized Intersection — May have marked crosswalks (2 lines) to guide pedestrians. The crossings may be limited to just one crosswalk across the major street at busy intersections or "T" intersections to reduce conflicts or avoid heavy turn movements. 2. Multi-Way Stop Intersection—Typically uses the stop bar/limit line(1 line) as the front line of the crossing in lieu of marking a full crosswalk (2 lines). If the intersection is near a park, school, library, hospital, shopping center or other high pedestrian traffic generator, then a marked crosswalk (2 lines) may be installed at the discretion of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer or designated appointee. 3. One or Two Way Stop Intersection - Typically uses the stop bar/limit line (1 line) as the front line of the crossing in lieu of marking a full crosswalk (2 lines). If the intersection is near a park, school, library, hospital, shopping center or other high pedestrian traffic generator, then a marked crosswalk (2 lines) may be installed at the discretion of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer or designated appointee. 4. Mid-Block Pedestrian or Bicycle Signal —typically marked with a crosswalk (2 lines) and other high visibility markings or devices. Uncontrolled Crossings: 1. Intersection—The practice is to not install marked crosswalks at uncontrolled intersections. The California Vehicle Code considers an intersection a legal crosswalk unless it is prohibited by signs. If the intersection is near a park, school, library, hospital, shopping center or other high pedestrian generator, then a marked crosswalk(2 lines) may be installed at the discretion of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer or designated appointee. The marked crosswalk shall include electronic flashing devices and/or high visibility markings and signing. 2. Mid-Block Location — The practice is to not install marked crosswalks (2 lines) at mid-block locations. At the discretion of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer or designated appointee, a mid-block marked crosswalk (2 lines) may be installed under the following conditions: • The location is near a school and an adult crossing guard is provided. ■ An electronic flashing device (usually activated by push button or camera) is provided. • If there are no devices, then a mid-block marked crosswalk shall include high visibility pavement markings and signing in advance of the crosswalk(ladder style) in addition to the 2 lines. 3. Unmarked Mid-Block Location — Typically found at community trail-head locations. The unmarked crossing shall include high visibility pavement markings (chevrons/dragons teeth) and/or high visibility devices in advance of the trail crossing. The crossing may include a pedestrian refuge area or median or high visibility devices,where appropriate. Establishment of the crossing shall be at the discretion of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer or designated appointee. 4. Other Considerations for Marked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Crossings: The sight distance should not be less than 10 times the approach speed for an unrestricted view of pedestrians by the motorist • Minimum pedestrian volumes justify the installation of a marked crosswalk • The distance to a controlled crossing or intersection exceeds 600 feet • Availability of a pedestrian refuge area or median • Number of approach lanes is less than 4 lanes • Low traffic volume on the street being crossed • Adequate gaps in vehicular traffic to provide a safe crossing • Limited visibility of the pedestrian crossing the street due to landscaping or other conditions ® Adequate lighting at the proposed crossing • Limited distance of pedestrian exposure to traffic while crossing the street • Adequate ADA ramps and sidewalks to receive pedestrians Old Town Specific Flan Multi-Way Stop or Signalized Intersection — Marked crosswalks shall be delineated by twelve (12) foot wide(outside to outside dimension)decorative stamped thermoplastic stencil on all approaches of the intersection. Attachments mob— ok LIMIT LINE t; �+� STANDARD CROSSWALK � �rr LADDER CROSSWALK r. MID-BLOCK n r� n 4� g ��N ter+ tea rd� .i .J I_•I 4114,4444 PEDESTRIAN PEDESTRIAN REFUGE WITH HIGH VISIBILITY PAVEMENT MARKING I � i I HIGH VISIBILITY PAVEMENT MARKING TRAFFIC ENGINEER' S REPORT 1999 MEMORANDUM TO: Pat Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent—PW Streets DATE: September 1, 2017 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report for August, 2017 CC: Judy McNabb, Administrative Assistant Mayra De La Torre, Principal Civil Engineer— Land Development Jerry Gonzalez,Associate Engineer II —Traffic Maria Hilton, Sr. Office Specialist—Traffic Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report for the Month of August, 2017 The attached spreadsheets detail the maintenance activities and related costs completed by both in house crews and maintenance contractors. Attachments: Monthly Activity Report Street Maintenance Division Street Maintenance Contractors Detail Report Contracted Maintenance Work Completed Graffiti Removal Chart MEMORANDUM TO: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: Rodney Tidwell,Maintenance Superintendent (0)DATE: September 11,2017 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report Au gust,2017 The following activities were performed by Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of August,2017: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 59 B. Total signs installed 46 C. Total signs repaired 47 D. Banners Replaced 0 [I. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 86 III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. Total square feet of A.C.repairs 1,310 B. Total Tons 26 IV CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 64 B. Down Spouts 0 _ C. Under sidewalks 3 D. Bowls 2 V RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 0 VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 40 B. Total S.F. 11,144 VII. STENCILING A.426 New and Repainted Legends B. 19,553 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping C. 6 Bull Nose D. 0 Thermal Plastic E. 0 RPMs Installed fl MAI�IfAIhMOAU KPf Also,City Maintenance staff responded to 107 service order requests ranging from weed abatement,tree trimming,sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 100 service order requests for the month of July, 2017. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 105 hours of overtime which includes standby time,special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of August, 2017 was$14,427 compared to $31,758 for the month of July,2017. Account No. 5402 $427 Account No. 5401 $14,000 Account No. 999-5402 $ Electronic Copies: Patrick Thomas,City Engineer Director of Public Works Amer Attar,Principal Civil Engineer Capital Improvements Mayra De LaTorre, Principal Civil Engineer Land Development Jerry Gonzalez,Associate Engineer II Traffic Division R\MAfNTA(N%MOACTRM' STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of August,2017 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: Miko Mountain Lion,Inc. Date:8/9/17 Santiago C Ormsby Repair storm outlet # I I i6 TOTAL COST F:::$144,000.00 Date: # TOTAL COST Date: TOTAL COST Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: West Coast Arborist,Inc. Date:7/31/17 City Wide Annual ROW tree trimming # 128184 TOTAL COST $427.00 Date: TOTAL COST CONTRACTOR: Date: TOTAL COST Date: TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $14,000.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $427.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 R\MANTAlN\MOAC rRl'I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Date Submitted: CONTRACTED MAINTENANCE WORK COMPLETED Submitted By: Patrick Thomas FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 Prepared By: Rodney Tidwell SCOPE OF WORK I JULY AUGUSTj SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER Year to Date ASPHALT CONCRETE Square Footage 886 1310 0 0 0 0 2,196 _ -------------•-................. ............... .. _ -.. -.. ... ......... ..... ._. Cost $ $ - $ - $ $ $ $ ------- ._ ---�.. .�,-_......_...._..... ----... - ........ --..-.._.. ------------- ANNUAL --•------•-- .. - ANNUAL SPRAYS Annual Spraying of Pre/Post Herbicides $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ - _--- ----------------- ----•-- ----------------- --------------- - -- DRAINAGE FACILITIES Channels(each) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------------- ..................................................................... ... - -._............ ........................ Cost $ $ - $ - ; $ $ $ STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS Striping(linear feet) 12215 19553 0 0 0 0 31,768 ..-»»..............................................................». ............_.........., ...................._.... .......»._.. ... .. �. Sandblasting(linear feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --------------------- ----------.-------.__. .---- _. ....__ -._._. .... ..... -_.. ..... Legends(each) 150 426 0 0 0 0 576 Cost $ $ $ $ - $ $ - $ TREES ^ Trees Trimmed 50 86 0 D 0 136 » 0»................................... ...._........ Trees Removed 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- ------------------ --------- -._..- ..._..... .... ................._.........�- Cost $ 14,858.00 $ 427.00 $ - $ - $ - $ $ 15,285.00 WEED ABATEMENT ROW Area Abated(Square Feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...............•......... ......... __.......-...._.......... ......... ........ ».. Other Public Lands Abated(Square Feet) 0 0 Y 0 _ 00 0 0 ..»._.._»....... ........ ... _... . ................................ »....... .....-...... Cost $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ MISC.MAINT ACTIVITES Misc Cleanup(mowing/debris/etc.) Cost $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ $ - - ---- ._.._...w_-..................... ................................................. ..._-___.......... . Install 10 LF of 18"CMP Cost $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ Fix Guardrail Cost i $ $ - $ $ $ - $ - : T - Repair Roadway Cost $ - $ $ $ $ - $ $ - ...--•-•••------- ------ ------------------------ -»---•-----............. ......_»--.-",.......- - - - .._..... Sandbags Cost $ $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ -- ---------------------•------------------..----. ...............--......... - - Misc.concrete work Cost $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ ; - ............................— -......._................ .._._._................. ..............»..... - Channel cleanout/Spraying Cost $ 15,900.00 $ 14,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,900.00 TOTAL CONTRACTED MAINT COSTS $ 31,758.00 $ 14,427.00 $ is - $ $ - $ 45,185.00 R WAINTAINNOACRTPWAY THRU DEC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Date Submitted August 1,2017 MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT Submitted By Patrick Thomas STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION Prepared By Roaney Tidwell FISCAL YEAR 2017-2018 1ST1JAF:Tn'r: Jui Au0-17 Se -17 1 FISCAL YEAR TO DATE WORK WORK WORK I t WORK I TOTAL COST FOR SCOPE OF WORK Jnit Co COMPLETED COST COMPLETED j COST COMPLETED COST I COMPLETED COST LAST FISCAL YEAR 1 I ASPHALT CONCRETE: � I Square Footage S297 886 $ 2,631.42 1.; S 3,890.70 0 $ - I 2 196 $ 6,522.12 $ 58,09023 Tons 6 0 { 12 Parking Lot Slurry Seal Square Footage t Gal Ions = 1 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE I Square Footage $297 0 '-i _ $ 0 S - 0 -$ S PCC Yards 0 v 0 1 0 I g STRIPING 3 PAVEMENT MARKINGS: Red cu(D 3 Striping(linear feet) $007 12 215 S 855.05 19 553 ;$ 1,368.71 S I 31 766 $ 2,223.76 $ 218.40 New 8 Repainted I egends(eacn) 580D 150 '•S 1,200.00 426 $ 3,408.00 G S - 1 576 $ 4,608.00 $ 18,136.00 Bull Noses(eacn) $007 G $ 0 t S 0 $ 0 $ $ Raised Pavement Mai kers-RPM'S(each) 36 00 I 36 36 Thermo Plastic Legends(each) 0 0 0 0 0 SIGNS S BANNERS - I No of Signs REPLACED 5263951 i$ 1,345.89 S9 =S 1,557.01 0 $ I 110 S 2,902.90 $ 22,537.08 Material(cost per sign) S5000 $ 2,550.00 5 2,950.00 $ j $ 5,500.00 $ 42,700-00 No of Signs INSTALLED 52639 4 $ 105.56 1,213.94 $ - 1 50 $ 1,319.50 $ 5,22522 Material(cast per sign) $5000 $ 200.00 _ 2,300.00 2,500.00 $ 9,900.00 i No of Signs REPAIRED $2639 24 $ 633.36 2 1,240.33 S - l 71 S 1,873.69 $ 18,077.15 Matenai(cost Per sign) 55000 $ 1,200.00 S 2,350.00 S - $ 3,550.00 $ 34,250.00 i No of BANNERS installed 52639 6 $ e - 0 $ - 0 €$ $ 20,45225 Christmas Wreaths Installed Sti S _ 1 0 $ 8 GRAFFITI REMOVAL y ' No of Locations 45 G 1 85 ? 775 Square Footage 4 701 0 1 15 845 Q 90569 1 DRAINAGE FACILITIES CLEANEDCatch Basins $26;13 85 $ 2,243.15 $ 1,688,96 $ 1 149 S 3,932.11 $ 23,249.59 Down Drains $2639 0 $ $ $ 1 0 $ S 1,820.91 Under siaewalk Drains $2635 0 $ $ 79.17 $ j 3 $ 79.17 S 11,928.28 Detention Basins $26 3W 0 $ $ 52.78 - $ - I 2 $ 52.78 $ 1,530.62 Bridge Deck Drains526 39 0 $ $ - 0 $ TREES TF14MMED I No of Trees Trimmed $2639 50 1$ 1,319.50 $ 2,269.54 $ - 136 $ 3,589.04 $ 16,203.48 1 ------------ R.i WEED ABATEMENT Area Abated(square feet) 50 034 0 1$ $ $ $ 432.88 The Street Maintenance Division also responds to service requests,the total number of Service Order Requests,some of which include work reported above Is reported monthly. SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS No 01 SOR's I Lu 743 ` 1 1 - Personnel assigned to the Street Maintenance Division are on-call and respond to after hours emergencies or support City sponsored special events I Overtime Hours $39 59I 210 L$ 8,313.90 105 $ 4,156.95 a S - $ 12,470.85 $ 48,814.47 TOTALS: 16,663 �$ 22,597.83 32.11 S 28,626.09 0 S 51,561 $ 51,123.82 $ 333,566.32 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL FISCAL YEAR 2017 - 2018 Month Number I Square 12,000 of Calls Footage Jul 45 4,701 10,000 Aug 40 11,144 Sep 8,000 Oct a, N 41 jp � u Nov 4V 6,000 c .o Dec Cr z° Jan 4,000 Feb Mar 2,000 Apr May 0 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Totals 85 15,845 Square r Number Footage of Calls POLICE CHIEF' S REPORT TEMECULA POLICE CRIMEa To: Southwest Station Admin From. Marianna Kuhn, Crime Analyst Date: September 5, 2017 Re: Temecula Police Department—Part 1 Calls for Service August 1 —31,2017 Total Part 1 calls for service: 239. A 1%decrease from the previous month (243). Temecula Police Department Part 1 Calls for Service 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 . 0 Aggravated Assault Burglary Larceny Theft Rape Robbery Vehicle Theft ■Total 31 26 148 1 11 22 UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category. This information includes vehicle burglaries in that category Non-written incidents: 50 Written incidents: 189 Total calls for service: 239 Not for Public Dislnbuhon Data provided by RSOIDala Warehouse Law Enforcement Use City of Temecula Traffic Statistics August 2077 Citation Totals Total Hazardous Citations 986 Total Non-Hazardous Citations 598 Parking Citations 153 Total Citations 1737 Citation Breakdown S.L.A.P. 129 N.E.T. Citations Unable to quantify until new tablets are deployed School Zones " It Seatbelt Citations 54 Community Presentations 0 Trak Collisions Non-Injury 29 Hit and Run 9 Injury 27 Fatal 1 Total 66 Pedestrian Related Collisions: 1 Note: Collision stats are only those calls for service resulting in a written Police report. D.U.I. Arrests D.U.I. Arrests 30 Total cell phone cites 275 (23123 & 23124 CVC) Grant Funded DUI Checkpoints/Click it or Ticket Operations/Special Operations OTS Funded DUI Checkpoint-August 18th OTS Funded Motorcycle Enforcement OTS Funded DUI Warrant Sweep -August 30th OTS Funded Primary Collision Factor Enforcement Prepared by Corporal B. De Loss#2914 September 6, 2017 Commission Members September 6,2017 City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 Ref: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Traffic Division Activities/Events Dear Commission Members: Below please find the Traffic Division activities for the month of August, 2017. These activities include the following: Citation statistics(attachment) ■ Part 1 Crimes(attachment) ■ Community Action Patrol supported call-outs: August 22nd: Fatal Traffic Collision on Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road August 25th: Assault with a Deadly Weapon Call • CAP Meetings: Regular CAP meeting was held on August 10th • Community Action Patrol activity/patrol hours: 854 hours for August,2017. Year-to-date total: 5,459 hours. *There were 25 CAP patrols with 42 members participating. • Training: None for August. • Special Events: August 18th: DUI Checkpoint August 19th: Rainbow Shooting Range If you have any questions regarding this package, please do not hesitate to call me at the Temecula Police Department,Traffic Division—(951)696-3072. Sincerely, Corporal Bryan De Loss Temecula Police Department—Traffic Division FIRE CHIEF ' S REPORT Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE Emergency Incident Statistics • PR{STECT PRESERVE John R. Hawkins Fire Chief 9/12/2017 Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIS Section Please refer to Map and Incident by Battalion,Station,Jurisdiction Incidents Reported for the month of August,2017 and Temecula City Page 1 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Response Activity Incidents Reported for the month of August,2017 and Temecula City N Com Fire 1 01% �+ False Alarm 59 8.4% I ■ Haz Mat 7 1.0% ■ Medical 489 695% -, OtherFire 7 1.0% ! Other Misc 1 01% _ ■ Public Assist 6 09% Public SeNce Assist 30 43% ■ Res Fire 2 03% Ringing Alarm 4 06% ■Standby 10 14% Traffic Collision 84 11.9% Vehicle Fire 1 01% a Wildland Fire 3 0.4% Total: 704 100.0% Com Fire 1 False Alarm 59 Haz Mat 7 Medical 489 Other Fire 7 Other Misc 1 Public Assist 6 Public Service Assist 30 Res Fire 2 Ringing Alarm 4 Standby 10 Traffic Collision 84 Vehicle Fire 1 Wildland Fire 3 Incident Total: 704 Average Enroute to Onscene Time* Enroute Time=When a unit has been acknowledged as responding.Onscene Time=When a unit has been acknowledge as being on scene.For anv other statistic outside Enroute to Onscene please contact the IT Help Desk at 951-940-6900 <5 Minutes +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average % 0 to 5 min 476 167 17 2 4.2 71.9% The following incidents are included in the total number of records but not in the average time HZM,HZMMC,OAC,OAF,OAM,OAMAD,OAMAI,OAMTE,OAMVA,OAP,OAR,OAV,OUT,OOU, LEB, LEO,LEI,BRNPMT,OES,PAA,PAD,PAF,PAO,PAP,HFS,HFSAM,HFSCA,HSBT,HSBTC,HSBTS,HSBTV,HSE,HSG Last Updated 9112/2017 2 Page 2 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction Com False Haz Mat Medical Other Other Public Public Res Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildlan Fire Alarm Fire Misc Assist Service Fire Alarm Collisio Fire d Fire e Station Pechanga Temecula 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 2 Station Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;. - � � s � It a t ► r � r F Cation 12 Temecula 0 25 1 88 2 1 1 7 0 0 4 25 0 1 emecula Station Total 0 25 1 88 2 1 1 7 0 Station 73 Rancho Temecula 0 13 3 161 1 0 1 6 0 3 3 28 0 O v California Station Total 0 13 3 161 1 0 1 6 0 3 3 28 0 0 Station 63 French Temecula 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Valley Station Total 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Station 64 Temecula 0 10 2 141 2 0 2 12 1 0 1 20 0 2 Parkview Station Total 0 10 2 141 2 0 2 12 1 0 1 20 0 2 Station 92 Wolf Temecula 1 10 1 88 2 0 2 5 1 1 2 11 1 0 Creek Station Total 1 10 1 88 2 0 2 5 1 1 2 11 1 0 [I it 'k 1111111111 INV III i Last Updated 9/12/2017 2 Page 3 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Jurisdiction Com Fire False Haz Mat Medical Other Other Public Public Res Fire Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildland Alarm Fire Misc Assist Service Alarm Collision Fire Fire Temecula 1 59 7 489 7 1 6 30 2 4 10 84 1 3 r WfforLILMIN Last Updated 9/12/2017 2: Page 4 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Supervisorial District- Summary DISTRICT 3 CHUCK WASHINGT Com Fire 1 False Alarm 59 Haz Mat 7 Medical 489 Other Fire 7 Other Misc 1 Public Assist 6 Public Service Assist 30 + Res Fire 2 Ringing Alarm 4 Standby 10 Traffic Collision 84 Vehicle Fire 1 Wildland Fire 3 Last Updated 9/12/2017 2: Page 5 of 6 "Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. MONTH = 8 and YEAR = 2017 and CITYNAME _ 'Temecula' .ltilaom.0 I Rl„<i,rie Fit AI L, J A' f,4 N Q$ t J 4+`1.., 46V %' w.( M 1 • 0" ,7Q r c]r' QP p i f� �V ,rN•Aea?EU- uAjtl YU,*: w' r f f rIll,ror,A r+.:•et ,�. �-� ,,�,�,111111 4 T-� _r.__ ,fy "'N".. Legend N iR Fie ti+ Other Mis c _ Q Rivers ide Comfy Fie Station ,a Ftaz Mat Public Service Assists Medical Flszard Reser•;atin— firm Riverside County Fire GIS Last Updated 9/12/2017 2: Page 6 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location.This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. 2017 City of Temecula Fire Department Emergency Response and Training Totals PUBLIC: SAFETY CLASS TOTALS 2017 Class Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total CPR AED 19 6 11 24 129 64 73 67 393 FIRST AID 16 10 0 60 47 4 8 61 206 PEDIATRIC FIRST AID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HCP 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 4 STAFF HCP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CERT 1 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 29 TEEN CERT 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 28 Total 36 1 16 11 112 207 68 82 128 0 0 0 0 660 INCIDENT/RESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2017 Incident Response Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total COMMERCIAL FIRE 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 6 FALSE ALARM 68 56 51 73 S7 62 44 59 470 HAZ MAT 4 3 6 3 3 6 6 7 38 MEDICAL AID 529 513 566 486 525 500 507 489 4115 MUTT FAMILY DWELLING 0 2 0 2 1 1 6 0 12 OTHER FIRE 5 4 2 8 5 5 3 7 39 OTHER MISC. 4 3 2 2 5 2 3 1 22 PSA 42 35 44 39 34 27 37 36 294 RINGING ALARM 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 4 4 14 RESIDENTIAL FIRE 2 1 2 2 4 1 1 2 15 RESCUE 1 1 1 1 0 0 7 0 11 STANDBY 14 9 8 12 11 15 1 10 80 TRAFFIC COLLISSION 69 77 83 71 79 61 84 84 608 VEHICLE FIRE 1 1 3 1 5 1 3 1 16 WILDLAND FIRE 1 1 1 3 2 2 3 3 16 Total 741 707 771 1 706 1 731 1 686 710 704 0 0 0 0 5756 FIRE DEPARTMENT CLASS TOTAL COMPARISON 2016 vs. 2017 800 700 0 600 500 400 300 207 200 176 112 114128 �s 100 �`� y 68 52 X 36 6 16 � � 3� 0 0 i 2016 YTO Cl 2017 YTD MONTH 2016 YTD 2017 YTD ANUARY 30 36 FEBRUARY 16 16 MARCH 71 11 APRIL 55 112 MAY 65 207 UNE 49 68 ULY 176 82 AUGUST 114 128 SEPTEMBER 95 OCTOBER 52 NOVEMBER 35 DECEMBER 0 TOTAL TO DATE 758 660 FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL CALL COMPARISON 2016 vs. 2017 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 .t7 4000 2016 YTD 3000 D 2017 YTD 2000 1000 :o Awn - =r 01 ,P�JP�J ���Q4� 'e `� MONTH 2016 YTD 2017 YTD JANUARY 693 741 FEBRUARY 675 675 MARCH 621 771 APRIL 681 706 MAY 702 731 JUNE 702 686 JULY - 708 710 AUGUST 699 704 SEPTEMBER 751 OCTOBER 744 NOVEMBER 766 DECEMBER 829 TOTAL TO DATE 8571 5724 Fire Depaf tmer Temecula Battalion Fire Stations- Public Education Reporting Month: August Reporting Year: 2017 Reporting 12, 73, 84, 92 Stations: PR and Public Education Programs: Total Number of Events Event Type Total Number of Hours Number of Public Contacts: for Reporting Month 0 School Event 0 0 0 Adult Education 0 0 0 Fair/Safety Expo 0 0 i 0 Display 0 0 3 Station Tour 5 77 0 Fire Safety Trailer 0 0 0 Other 0 0 Field Inspections: LE-100's (Weed Abatement) Total Number of Initial Fleld Total Number of Inspections for Reporting 0 LE-100 Inspections for Q Month Reporting Month Prevention Referrals: Total Number of Re-inspections for Reporting 0 Total Number of Fire Month Prevention Referrals for 2 Reporting Month Significant Events: Provide a brief synopsis of significant TC's, Fires, Near Drowning's, Road Closures etc. Include photos if available. The Fire Department responded to over 700 incidents within the City of Temecula as well as supported the surrounding jurisdiction. Including a structure fire at Walmart, a fatality at Butterfield Stage Road and Temecula Pkwy involving a few cars.