HomeMy WebLinkAbout032593 PTS AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
TO BE HELD AT
CITY HALL
MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA
Thursday, March 25, 1993 - 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL:
COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Holliday, Johnson, Knopp,
Perry, Sander
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you
desire to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request
to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording
Secretary before the Commission gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Minutes of February 25, 1993
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of February 25, 1993 as mailed.
Avenida Barca and Maroarita Road
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to City Council that
traffic signals be installed at Avenida Barca and Margarita Road. It is also
requested that the Commission review the possibility of installing a four way
stop control as an interim measure.
-1- pw01\traffic\commissn\agenda\93\0325 0315a
Winchester Road (Route 79) and Nicolas Road
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend to City Council that
traffic signals be installed at Winchester Road (Route 79) and Nicolas Road,
using the existing roadway configuration.
La Serena Way and Calla Medusa - 3-Way Sto~
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 It is recommended at this time that the existing stop control remain.
Walcott Bypass
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 It is recommended that the commission approve the recommendations of the
Calla PiCa Colada Ad Hoc committee on the Walcott Bypass.
Speed Humos
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Recommend to the City Council the establishment of a policy on speed humps.
City Parking Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Recommend to City Council changes in the City Parking Ordinance.
OTHER BUSfNESS
8. Traffic Engineer's Report
9. Police Chief's Report
10. Fire Chief's Report
11. Commission Reports
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be
held on Thursday, April 22, 1993, 7:00 p.m., Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room,
43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA.
-2- pw01\traffic\cornmissn\agenda\93\0325 0315a
ITEM NO. I
MINUTE OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission was called to
order Thursday, February 25, 1993, 7:00 P.M., at Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room,
43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by
Chairman Ron Guerriero. Commissioner Johnson led the flag salute.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
5 COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Johnson, Holliday, Perry, Sander
1 COMMISSIONERS: Knopp
Also present were Director of Public Works Tim Serlet, Traffic Engineer Ben Dobbins, Sgt. Jim
Domenoe, Fire Chief Jim Wright and Minute Clerk Gall Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Neighborhood Watch Chairperson Chris Martinelli gave an update on the status of the
Neighborhood Watch Program and distributed a recent Neighborhood Watch newsletter.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Minutes of January 28, 1993
Chairman Guerriero asked that Page 2, third from the last paragraph, be amended to
read "...sub-committee will be looking at truck routes...".
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Perry to approve
the minutes of January 28, 1993 as amended.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
5 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
1 COMMISSIONERS:
Guerriero, Johnson, Holliday, Perry, Sander
None
Knopp
Multi-Functional Hazard Plan
Mary Moreland, Emergency Services Coordinator for the Riverside County Fire
Department, provided a synopsis of the Multi-Functional Hazard Plan and distributed
information to the Commission on the Incident Command System.
Chairman Guerriero asked that a report from the Fire Department on the "first
responder" be placed on the next available agenda.
3. Temecula Shuttle
Ed Dool, owner and operator of Temecula Shuttle, gave a presentation on a proposed
Dial-A-Ride service which he will be presenting to the City Council and distributed a
copy of a transit rider survey which is currently be conducted. Mr. Dool explained that
he will be asking the City Council to approve funding for two vehicles and $20,000 for
start-up costs.
Chairman Guerriero asked Mr. Dool if he had contacted RTA about e Dial-A-Ride
service which could be implemented in Temecula.
Mr. Dool stated that Temecula is scheduled for a Dial-A-Ride program in 1995 through
the RTA.
Chairman Guerriero stated that he would like to see the results of the Transit Rider
Survey.
Chairman Guerriero declared a recess at 8:25 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:35 P.M.
City Parking Ordinance
Sgt. Jim Domenoe distributed a copy of Ordinance 91-16 and asked that the
Commissioners review the Ordinance and make suggestions for possible modifications
or amendments, which will be brought back to the Commission for discussion.
Chairman Guerriero suggested that the Commission, working with the Police
Department formulate a weekly "Traffic Safety" column in one of the local
newspapers.
Director Serlet suggested that staff discuss the idea with the local newspapers and
report back to the Commission.
m
Speed Humps
Tim Setlet presented the staff report. He suggested that staff prepare a Speed Hump
policy for review and discussion by the Commission.
Chairman Guerriero stated he would like to tour the areas where speed humps which
have been implemented in San Diego prior to discussing a proposed policy.
P/TSMINQ2/25/93 -2- 3/06/93
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
OTHER BUSINESS
FEBRUARY 25,1993
Traffic Enqineer's Reeort
Ben Dobbins reviewed annual Traffic Census Program.
Police Chief's Reoort
Sgt. Domenoe reviewed the monthly police crime stars.
Commissioner Holliday asked for a breakdown of the rapes which occurred in 1991
and 1992, by adult and children.
Fire Chief's ReDoft
Fire Chief Jim Wright introduced himself to the Commission and reviewed the monthly
fire stats.
Chief Wright advised that the Chief Fire Officers obtained radios to communicate with
the City's 800 MgHz case radio. He advised that a Radio Interface Module was
installed at Station 73, which will allow the City, Fire and Police to communicate with
each other.
9. Commission Reeorts
Commissioner Sander reported that during heavy rains, there is flooding at the base
of the uphill grade on Calle Medusa, off Nicolas Road, which causes traffic to drive on
the wrong side of the street. Commissioner Sander expressed concern due to a
problem with sight distance in this area and suggested this portion of Calle Medusa
needs yellow centerline striping.
Commissioner Sander asked for a update on the status of the street light for the
intersection of Nicolas and Highway 79 North (Winchester Road).
Ben Dobbins advised that Southern California Edison has not received clearance from
Cal Trans to place a pole in the Cal Trans right-of-way.
Chairman Guerriero asked for volunteers to serve on a sub-committee to review truck
routes and policies for over-size load carriers within the City.
Chairman Guerriero requested volunteers to serve on a Neighborhood Crime Watch
sub-committee and volunteered to serve on the sub-committee. Commissioner Perry
P/TSMIN02/25/93 -3- 3~06~93
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION FEBRUARY 25, 1993
recommended that Commissioner Knopp serve on the committee and Commissioner
Holliday volunteered to serve on the committee.
Chairman Guerriero stated that he was given the suggestion that the City purchase one
of the old California Highway Patrol vehicles for a City traffic vehicle. Chairman
Guerriero also recommended that the City apply for a grant through the Office of
Transportation Safety for an additional motorcycle unit and radar.
Ben Dobbins advised that O.T.S. only accepts requests by letter.
Chairman Guerriero asked that FITA and CSA 143 give a report on Dial-A-Ride.
Adiournment
It was moved by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Holliday to adjourn at
10:25 P.M. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be
held on Thursday, March 25, 1993, 7:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall Main Conference Room,
43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Ron Guerriero
Secretary
P/TSMIN02/25193 -4- 3/06193
ITEM NO. 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
March 25, 1993
Item 2
Traffic Signals - Avenida Barca and Margarita Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the commission recommend to City Council the installation of Traffic Signals at the
intersection of Avenida Barca and Margarita Road, it is also recommended that the
Commission recommend on the installation of a four way stop as a interim measure.
BACKGROUND:
The existing intersection is now controlled with stop signs facing traffic on Avenida Barca.
The intersection is a school crossing with crosswalks on the northerly easterly and southerly
legs. A crossing guard now is posted at the intersection during school crossing time. Vehicle
turning movement and pedestrian counts were made from 6:30 to 8:30 am and from 1:30
pm to 3:00 pm. These counts found that a traffic signal was warranted for a school area
traffic signal as established by the State of California.
TRAFFIC DATA:
Peak AM-PM Volumes
Margarita Traffic Volume
Pedestrians Crossing
Attached signal warrant sheet.
6:45 am to 7:45 am 1:45 Dm to 2:45 pm
653 541
77 93
pwO1\traffic\comrnissn\agenda\93\0325 0315
ACCIDENT DATA: 1991 1992 1993
I 1 1'
* Recent accident involving vehicle, crossing guard and school age pedestrian.
FISCAL IMPACT:
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
TOTAL
FOUR WAY STOP
2 "STOP AHEAD" Signs and Legends. 2 @ ,140.00
2 "STOP" Signs and Legends. 2 @ ,110.00
TOTAL
= ,100,000.00
= $280.00
= ,220.00
= ,500.00
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Signal Warrants
2. Collision Diagram
pwOl\traffic\commissn\agenda\93\0325 0315
9-10
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING
Figure9~5
SCHOOL PROTECTION WARRANTS
Traffic Manual
CALC
CHK
DIST CO RTE PM
MaiorSt: MP,~'Q,.AI~,~I'/~ ,q0~,1)
Minor St: /~ '.f ~- ~' = O ~, B ~. ,~ ¢ ~,
Critical speed of major street traffic >_ 40 mph .............. ~
or
In built up area of iselated community of < 10,000 pop. _
PJ~, ~o~'g,'~':~ DATE ~/.~/~:~
DATE
Critical Approach Speed z/~
Critical Approach Speed Z 5
RURAL (a)
URBAN (U)
mpn
mph
FLASHING YELLOW SCHOOL SIGNALS
(ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED)
PART A
Vehicle Volume
Crossing Street
School Age Pedestrian,'
PAhT B
2 hours
AND
Critical Approach Speed Exceeds 35 mph
AND
PART C
Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600 feet away?
SATISFIED YES ~
SATISFIED YES []
SATISFIED YES ~
SATISFIED YES [2]
NO []
NO []
NO []
NO []
SCHOOL AREA TRAFFIC SIGNALS
(ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED)
-.in, .m.eq.,reme.,s
PARTA . U
Vehicle Volume 2Eahcehur%f SO0
Each ot 100 7
2 hours C~) 7
School Age Pedestrians ...................
Crossing Street or 500 350
I per day
AND
PART B -
Is nearest controlled crossing more than 600 feet away?
SATISFIED
SATISFIED
SATISFIED
YES Z NO []
YES [] NO []
YES [] NO []
COLLISION DIAGRAM
O0 ~ '~ ~'-,2 FROM ~
-Ti=-/,rb:, "' ~ PREPARED BY
NUMBER OF ACC;D~NTS
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY .
==~__[NjURY OR FATAL
TOTAL ACCIDENTS
FTSR,S:
SHOW FOR EA, ACCIDENT
3. NIT~ ~ IF 5ET~VEEN OUSK
ITEM NO. 3
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
March 25, 1993
Item 3
Traffic Signals - Winchester Road (Route 79) and Nicolas Road
RECOMMENDATION:
That the commission recommend to the City Council that traffic signals be installed as soon
as possible at the intersection of Winchester Road (Route 79) and Nicolas Road. These
signals would be installed prior to the widening of Winchester Road and would use the
existing roadway configurations.
BACKGROUND:
The intersection meets the following warrants for traffic signals.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Minimum Vehicular Volume
Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Accident Experience
Combination of Warrants
Four Hour Volume
Peak Hour Volume
At this time the widening of Winchester Road and signalization of Nicolas Road is scheduled
for 1994.
Traffic Volumes:
See Traffic Signal Warrants.
Accident Date:
11 Accidents, 1 year and 11 months.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Traffic Signals = $100,000.00.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Signal Warrants
2. Tabular Summary of Vehicle Counts
3. Collision Diagram
4. Turning Volume Counts
pwo1\traffic\comrnissn\agenda\93\0325 0315
9-6 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual
Figure 9-1
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
DATE
DATE
CALC
D[ST CO RTE PM CHK
Maierst: ~J,~OHES]'IE~Z ~a~r~ (~a~'r~ 79) CdticalApproachSpeed 5'5 mph
Minor St: /,/I C O L x~ S 2o ~. E~ Critical Approach Speed {; O mph
Critical speed of major street traffic :> 40 mob ............. l~ 1
' ' or RURAL (R)
In built up area el isol~.ted community of < 10,0a0 pop .......... []
[] URBAN (U)
WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicutar Volume 100% SATISFIED YES [] NO []
(80"1o SHOWN IN BRACKETS) 80~/o SATISFIED YES [] NO []
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
u 1<Gbi u
(112}
WARRANT 2 - interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES Z), NO []
80% SATISFIED YES [] NO []
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(8o% SHOWN IN BRACKETS)
U t(~') U l
~iar S~t (~a) ~7~ D I
WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume
100% SATISFIED YES E:~ NO ~
REQUIREMENT
P~destdan volume crossing the major street is 100 er more
for each ot any.four hours or is 190 or more dudng any one
hour, AND
There are less than 60 geps per hour in the major street trot-
fie stream of adequate tength for pedestrians to cross; AN~
The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater
than 300 feet; ANO
The new traffic signal will net sedousty disrupt progressive
traffic flow on the major sireeL
FULFfLLED
Yes [] No ~.
Yes [] No []
Yes No []
Yes ~ No []
The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justific.~tion far a sfgnaL Delay, congestion, confusion or other
evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown.
WARRANT 6 - Accident E×perience
REQUIREMENTS
ONE WARRANT
SATISRED
80%
SATISFIED
WARRANT IJ
_ _~A_~2A_"~_t_' __~I"_I~_U_~__~E_~I_~UZR_~_OL_~_'=' ........ _'/
OWRARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC %/
SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW
ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY
ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & ~NVOLVING INJURY OR >_. $500 DAMAGE ·
F ......... ...........
YES ~] NO []
FULFiLLEU
YEs~ No E:]
[] []
WARRANT 8 - Combination of Warrants
SATISFIED YES [] NO []
REQUIREMENT
TWO WARRANTS
SATISFIED
80%
WARRANT
1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME
2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC
FULFILLED
YES ~ NO
WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume
Approach Lanes
SATISFIED* YES [] NO []
Both Approaches Major Street
Highest Approaches - Minor Street
One
more ~"~ 3-'~ ~/-~ -/,, Hour
x C
Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied.
WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume
Approach Lanes
Both Approaches Major Street
Highest Approaches - MinOr Street
ORe
,
SATISFIED
2or
roD,e,'-'/ /
YES ~' NO []
Hour
Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied.
The satisfaction Qf a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence
of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown.
COLLISION DIAGRAM
PREPARED 8Y ~, b
lu- 28*q'Z l~'2Y FT'-f'
, /-
TOTAL ACOIDENTS
SHOW FOR EA. ACCIDENT
1. TIME. DAY. OAT[
2. WEATHER ANO ROAD
SURFAC~ - IF UNUSUAL
25424 Jadyn Avenue. Moreno Valley, CA. 92557 . tel 909.247.6716 fax ?09.924.8604
C~TY 0~ TE~ECULA
~C~EST~R ROAD/~IC~OLA3 ROAD
HOUR TURNING VOLUME COUNT
AM/MID-DAY/PM PEAK HOURS
COUNTS UNLIMITED
Site Code: i0 EOUR COUNT
N-8 STREET: WINCHESTER ROAD FILE: TTSA~NA
R-W STREET: NICOLAE ROAD
WEATHER : SUNNY Movements by: Primary DATE: 2/02/93
PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:00 AN - 9:00 AN
DIRECTION START PEAl HR ........... VOLUMES ................. PERCENTS .......
FROM PEAR HOUR FACTOR PEDS Eight Thru Left Total PEDS Eight Thru Left
North 7:45 AN O.g8 0 0 506 81 587 0 88
East 8:00 AN 0.72 0 lZO 0 172 292 41 0 59
South 8:00 AN 0.97 0 87 283 0 370 24 76 0
West 8:00 AN 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entire Intersection
North 8:00 AN 0.90 0 0 464 86 550 0 84 I6
East 0.70 0 i80 0 172 892 41 0 59
South 0.97 0 R7 283 0 370 24 76 0
West 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
--- 550 ....
WINCHESTER ROAD '
,.
,.
· . 403
464 86 ..........
N
W-+-E
S
0 [PEDS ]
-- 120
292 0
-- 172
[ PEDS ] 0
--- 370 ....
' 0 283
636 '
... WINCHESTER ROAD
87
NICOLAS ROAD ...
173 ..........
0 [PEDS ]
COUNTS UNLIEITED
Site Code: I0 HOUR COUNT PAGE: 1
M-S 6TSEET: WINCHE6TER ROAD FILE: TTSAWNA
E-~ STREET: NICOLAS ROAD
WEATHER : SUNNY Movements by: Primary DATE: 2/02/93
Time .... From North ........ From East ........ From South ........ From Weet .... Vehicle PRDS
Begin PEDS RT TRRU LT PEDS RT THRU LT PEDS RT TERU LT PEDS RT TERU LT Total T~tal
S:00 AN 0 072 5 O 8 0 28 0 3 34 D 0 00 0 I4E O
6:I5 0 O107 3 0 16 0 39 0 2 31 0 0 00 0 I08 0
6:30 0 0141 7 0 13 0 44 0 7 42 0 0 00 0 264 0
6:45 0 0148 1I 0 Z5 0 59 0 17 52 0 0 00 0 312 0
ER TOTAL 0 0 468 26 0 60 0 170 0 29 169 O 0 0 0 0 913 0
7:00 AN
7:15
7:30
7:45
HR TOTAL
114 19 0 22 0 49 0 11 44 D 0 0 0 0 259
104 12 0 27 0 28 0 · 13 76 0 0 0 0 0 260
I30 11 0 20 0 37 0 12 75 0 0 0 0 0 285
154 t2 0 25 0 36 9 17 71 0 0 0 0 0 317
502 54 0 94 0 15S 0 63 268 0 0 0 0 0 I121
6:90 AN 0 O 123 11 0 3D 0 29 0 13 74 D 0 0 0 0 280 0
8:15 O O 109 26 0 15 0 44 0 28 66 D 0 0 0 0 888 0
8:30 0 0 120 32 0 35 0 38 0 23 71 0 0 0 0 0 319 0
8:46 O 0 II2 I7 0 40 0 gl 0 23 72 0 O 0 0 O 325 0
HR TOTAL 0 0 464 86 0 120 0 i72 O 87 263 0 0 0 0 0 i212 0
DAY TOTAL ! 0 1}34 166 D 274 D 494 0 1H9 708 0 0 0 0 0 3245 I
PEAR PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 6:00 AR - 9:00 AN
DIRECTION START PEAR HR ........... VOLUMES ................. PERCENTS .......
FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR PEDS Right Thru Left Total PEDS Right Thru Left
North 7:45 AE 0,88 0 0 506 81 58? 0 86 14
East 8:00 AN 0.72 0 t20 0 172 292 41 0 99
S~uth 8:00 AM 0.97 0 87 283 0 370 24 76 0
West 8:00 AM 0,00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entire [ntersectlon
Worth 8:00 AN 0,90
East 0.72
South 0.9?
West 0.00
0 464 86 550 9 84 i6
120 0 I79 292 41 0 59
87 183 0 370 24 76 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
COUNTS UNLIMITED
Site Code: I0 YOUR COUNT PAGE: I
N-S STREET: WINCHESTER EOAD FILE: TTSAWMM
E-W STMEET: NICOLAS ROAD
WEATHER : SUNNY Movenento .by: Primary DATE: 2/02/93
DEAR PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR TEE PERIOD: I0:00 AN - 1;00 PM
DIRECTIOH START PEAR RR ........... VOLUMES ................. PERCENTS .......
FROM PEAR HOUR FACTOR PEDS Right Thru Left Total PEDH Right Thru Left
~orth i0:00 AN 0.91 2 0 461 56 517 0 89 ll
Hast IZ:00 PM 0,94 0 50 0 99 I50 07 0 00
South 11:45 AN 0.91 2 lZ0 441 1 562 21 78 0
West 11:45 AN 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entire intersection
North 1t:45 AN 0.85 2 0 429 56 485 0 88 lR
East 0,93 0 53 0 I04 167 34 0 60
South 0.91 2 120 44i 1 062 21 78 0
West 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
[PEDS ] 2
.......... 1
.,, NICOLAS ROAD
0
WINCHESTER ROAD
0 429 56
--- 485 ....
.. 494
157
N
W-+-E
S
104
[ PEDS ] 0
0
562 ....
., 533 ...
.,. WINCHESTER ROAD
1 441 120
NICOLAS ROAD ,,
176 .........
2 [PEDS ]
COUNTS UNLIMITED
Site Code: 10 HOUR COUNT PAGE: }
N-S STREET; W[NCEE~TEE ROAD PILE: TTSAWNN
E-W DTREET: NICOLAS ROAD
WEATHER : SUNNY Movements by: Primae~ DATE: 2/D2/9$
Time .... From North ........ From East ........ From South ........ From West .... Vehicle PEDE
Begin PEDE RT TNRE LT PEDB RT TNRU LT PEDE RT TNRO LT PEDS RT THEU LT. Total Total
lO:OO AN O O127 15 O 15 O 18 0 14 91 O 0 00 0 2SO O
10:15 2 0114 15 0 13 0 13 0 15 94 0 0 00 0 274 2
10:30 0 0106 12 0 6 0 Z0 0 20 85 0 0 00 0 2~0 0
I0:45 0 0114 i4 0 15 0 97 0 16 90 0 0 0O 0 2S4 0
HE TOTAL 2 0 461 56 0 49 0 88 0 65 368 0 0 0 0 0 IOET H
1i:00 AM 0 0 122 7 0 12 0 00 0 23 i09 0
lhl9 I 0 i0I I5 0 I6 0 24 0 25 i01 0
11:30 0 0 Hi 10 0 6 0 21 0 28 91 0
1t:45 0 0 125 17 0 8 0 Z8 0 36 118 0
RR TOTAL I 0 440 49 0 40 0 93 2 112 419 0
IE:00 PH 0 0 90 1t 0 15 0 27 0 31 i17 0
12:15 2 0 9E I3 0 I3 0 24 0 2H iI2 0
I2:30 0 0 II8 I5 0 i7 0 95 0 27 94 1
12:45 0 0 98 I? 0 I4 0 23 0 30 t09 0
HR TOTAL 2 0 402 5R 0 59 0 99 0 114 429 1
0 0 0 293 0
0 0 0 282 i
0 0 0 148 0
0 0 0 332 2
0 0 0 t155 3
0 0 0 291
0 0 0 284
0 0 0 297
0 0 0 288
0 0 I160
DAY TOTAL 5 0 1303 16t 0 150 0 280 9 991 1216 1 0 0 0 0 3402 7
PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIE FOR THE PERIOD: 10:00 AM - i:00 PN
DIRECTION START PEAK NR ........... VOLUMES ................. PERCENTS .......
FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR PEDS Right Thru Left To£al PEDS Eight Thru Left
North 10:00 AN 0.91 Z 0 461 SE 517 0 89 1I
East 12:00 PN 0.94 0 59 0 99 I58 37 0
South Ii:45 AN 0.91 2 I90 441 I 569 21 78 0
West 1t:45 AM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entire Entersection
North 11:45 AN 0.85 E 0 429 56 485 0 88
East 0,93 0 53 0 104 i57 34 0
South 0.91 2 120 441 1 562 21 78 0
West 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
COUNTS UNLIMITED
Site Cede: !O HOUR COUNT PAGE: i
N-S STREET: WINCHEHTER ROAD FILE: TTAAWNP
E-W STREET: HICOLAS ROAD
;~EATHRR : SUNN? Movements by: PrimarT DATE: 2/02/93
PEAR PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 3:00 DH - 7:00 FN
DIRECTION START PEAR RR ........... VOLUEEH ................. PERCENTS .......
FRON PEAR HOUR FACTOR REDS Right Thru Left Total PEDH Right Thru Left
North 4:45 PN 0,92 I 0 45i llI 562 0 80 20
East 3:00 PM 0.89 O 87 0 iO2 i89 46 0 54
South 4:30 FR O.fi I I91 730 0 921 21 79 0
West 4:30 PM 0.O0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0
Entire Intersect[on
North 4:30 PM 0,94 0 0 456 102 558 O 82
East 0.3i 0 80 0 73 I53 52 0 48
South D J1 I 19t 730 0 921 21 79 0
West O.O0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0
0
--- 558 ....
WINCHESTER ROAD ...
810
456 102
153
N
W-+-E
S
0 [PEDS ]
80
0
73
[ PEDS ] 0
921
529 ...
0 730
WINCHESTER ROAD
191
NICOLAS ROAD ...
293 ..........
1 [PEDS ]
COUNTS UNLIMITED
Site Code: !0 MOU~ COUNT ?AGE:
N-S STREET: ~[NCH~STER ROAD FILE: TTAAWNP
E-~ STREBT: NICOLAS ROAD
'WEATHBR : SUNNY Movements by: Primary DATE: 2/0Z/83
?lie .... From North ........ From East ........ From ~outh ........ Frna ~est .... Vehicle PEDS
Begin PEDS RT TRRU LT PEBS RT TNRU LT PEDS RT TNRU LT PEDS RT TMRO LT Total Total
3:90 PN O 0 I0I 22 0 27 0 26 1 20 135 0 O 0 O O 331
3:15 0 0 94 22 O 2i 0 35 0 3I 148 O 0 O 0 0 341 0
3:30 0 0 115 21 0 19 0 31 I 24 '173 0 0 0 0 0 333
3:45 0 0t22 I8 0 80 D 20 0 34 171 0 0 00 0 335 0
MR TOTAL 0 0 432 83 0 87 0 102 2 109 627 0 0 0 0 0 1440 2
4:00 PN 1 0 II1 I8 0 1i 0 27 0 37 178 0 0 0 0 0 383
4:I5 0 0 i15 23 0 19 0 3t 0 5i i47 D 0 0 0 0 388
4:00 0 O 128 21 0 17 0 18 0 38 I91 0 0 0 0 0 411
4:45 0 0 t13 22 0 19 0 i8 0 43 I79 0 0 0 0 0 392
MR TOTAL I 0 467 85 0 ~8 0 90 0 I60 805 0 0 0 0 0 1572
5:90 PN O 0 105 30 0 82 O 10 0 58 193 0
5:I5 0 0 II0 20 0 88 0 Z5 1 51 i67 O
5:30 I 0 I23 30 0 14 0 80 0 50 I61 0
5:45 O 0 93 36 0 17 0 81 0 64 I47 0
BR TOTAL I 0 431 I25 O 75 0 82 I 224 868 0
6:00 FE 0 081 32 O14 O20 0?O 130 0
6:15 0 085 14 013 018 08I 103 0
0:30 0 082 28 0I3 018 041 88 O
6:45 0 081 1I 024 032 033 70 0
HR TOTAL '0 0 329 05 O 84 0 88 0 195 399 0
0 0 0 425
0 0 0 404
0 O 0 398
0 O 0 378
0 0 0 1605
355 0
284 0
270 0
25i 0
1160 0
DAY TOTAL 2 0 1559 378 0 292 0 302 3 ~07 2389 0 0 0 0 5777 5
COUNTS UNLIMITED
Site Code :lO 8OU~ COUNT PAOE: 2
N-S STREET: WINCHESTER ROAD FILE: TTAAWNP
E-W STREET: RICOLAB ROAD
WEATHEH : SUNNY Movements by: Primary DATE: 1/02/93
PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 3:00 PH - 7:00
DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........... VOLUMES ................. PERCENTS .......
FROM PEAR HOUR FACTOR PEDS Right Thru Left Total PEDS Ri_~ht Thru Left
North 4:45 PN 0.92 1 0 45i 1II 562 0 80 20
East 3:00 PN 0.89 0 87 0 i02 189 48 0 04
South 4:30 PE 0.01 I t01 730 0 OZi 21 79 0
West 4:30 PH 0.00 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entire intersection
~erth 4:30 PH 0.04 0 0 456 I02 558 0 88 I8
East 0,81 0 00 0 73 t53 52 0 48
South 0.91 i 191 730 0 911 21 79 0
West 0.00 0 0 O 0 D 0 O 0
ITEM NO. 4
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
March 25, 1993
Item 4
La Serena Way and Calle Medusa - 3-Way Stop
PREPARED BY: Annie Bostre, Traffic Technician
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request for a 3-Way Stop Sign at La
Serena Way and Calle Medusa at this time.
BACKGROUND:
As requested by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, staff analyzed the intersection of La
Serena Way and Calle Medusa.
The existing intersection is controlled with a Stop Sign on Calle Medusa. Calle Medusa and
La Serena Way east of Calle Medusa does not have striping along its centerline. The double
yellow striping along La Serena Way west of Calle Medusa ends 60 feet from the intersection
of La Serena Way and Calle Medusa. (see attached "Existing Striping" sketch)
Vehicle turning movement and pedestrian counts were taken on March 9, 1993 during the
hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.mo and on March 10, 1993 from
2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The results from this study are as follows:
8-HOUR COUNT:
Left Turn Throuah Cars Riaht Turn Total
La Serena
Eastbound 1184 92 N/A 1276
Westbound N/A 90 44 134
Calle Medusa
Southbound 26 N/A 1310 1336
ACCIDENT DATA:
1991 1992 1993
0 0 0
pwO1\traffic\commissn\agenda\93~0325 0315
Staff conducted a multi-way stop sign warrant analysis for the intersection of Calle Medusa
and La Serena Way per Department of Transportation "Traffic Manual" and found that this
intersection does not warrant any additional stop signs.
From the data collected, the number of westbound "through" cars on La Serena Way does not
produce a significant impact on the number of eastbound left turn cars onto Calle Medusa.
Staff recommends the following striping which will help define the traffic flow: (see attached
"Recommended Striping" sketch)
Stripe a "Through" and a left*turn lane on La Serena Way just west of Calle
Medusa.
Extend the double yellow centerline stripe on La Serena Way 200 feet east of
Calle Medusa.
Stripe a "Through" and a right-turn lane (with a R-18 sign) on La Serena Way
just east of Calle Medusa.
Paint a double yellow centerline stripe on Calle Medusa 100 feet north of La
Serena.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Estimated striping and signing cost: $400,00
ATTACHMENTS:
2.
3.
4.
Turning Movement Count
Vehicle Volume Summary
Sketch of Existing Striping
Sketch of Recommended Striping
pwO1\traffic\commissn\agenda\93\0325 0315
VEHICLE VOLUME SUMMARY
NORTH
12GTG
TOTAL
0
p.,-
0
, -Hzst,s
STREET
t
TOTAL
TIME
TOTAL HOURS -
FROM
"l:oo AM TO 9:c:x3 AM
luc:x3 AN l'cb I:oO iob.,l
2:OO PM TO G:oO PM
LOCATION:
DATE
~4,,:s,~__.:.H
ITEM NO. 5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Don Spagnolo, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
March 25, 1993
Item 5
Walcott Bypass
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the commission approve the recommendations of the Calle Pina
Colada Ad Hoc committee on the Walcott Bypass.
BACKGROUND:
A planning level study has been performed to determine the horizontal and vertical alignments,
as well as the potential drainage and grading concerns for improvements to Walcott Lane,
Calle Girasol, and Calle Chapos. This corridor will provide a north/south route on the east side
of the City from La Serena Way to Nicolas Road.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
pw01\traffic\comrnissn\agenda\93\0325 0315
ITEM NO. 6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA REPORT
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ben Dobbins, Traffic Engineer
March 25, 1993
Item 6
Speed Humps
PREPARED BY:
Jim Faul, Engineering Technician
RECOMMENDATION:
At the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's request, Staff has prepared a report on speed hump
installation and policies as a traffic control device on public residential streets.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Temecula has received numerous requests for the installation of speed humps in
residential areas. Speed humps would be installed to reduce vehicular speeds and deter
"short-cut" routes through residential neighborhoods.
Streets perform two (2) basic transportation functions: Provide access to individual parcels
of land and provide movement between various origins and destinations. Local residential
streets should be protected from excessive speeds (greater than 25 to 30 mph) and from
through traffic. Installing speed humps, which are carefully designed undulations in the
pavement surface, is one method devised to accomplish the above objectives.
Many municipalities in California are currently using speed humps and are listed below:
City of Campbell
City of Santa Rosa
City of Placentia
City of Brea
City of Paramount
City of Baldwin Park
City of Yorba Linda
City of Poway
City of Upland
City of National City
City of Simi Valley
City of Thousand Oaks
-1- pw01\traffic\commissn\agenda\93\0325 0315a
City of Claremont City of Berkeley
City of El Monte City of Clovis
City of Redondo Beach City of San Luis Obispo
City of Laguna Beach City of Roseville
City of Sacramento City of Chico
City of Agoura Hills City of San Jose
City of Manhattan Beach City of Cupertino
City of Santa Monica City of Los Angles
City of Costa Mesa County of Riverside
City of Newport Beach County of Ventura
City of Westminster City of Anaheim
City of Camarillo City of Fullerton
City of San Diego City of Pasadena
City of Corona
On February 23, 1993, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, along with Staff, field inspected
various speed humps installed in the cities of Pasadena and Corona.
As previously mentioned, the positive effects of using speed humps are:
Vehicular Speed Reduction
Discouragement of "short-cut" through traffic
While the notable negative effects are:
Can be uncomfortable for those driving over the speed humps
May divert traffic onto adjacent residential streets
May slow down response time for Fire and Emergency vehicles
Increased noise due to acceleration after speed hump
Possible proliferation throughout City streets
Possible liabilities
Additional City maintenance cost
Many municipalities shy away from installing speed humps due to the liability exposure. The
liability issue is raised due to current policy that all official traffic control devices are regulated
by the California Traffic Control Devices Committee through the California Department of
Transportation (CalTrans). Although speed humps are not specifically identified as an official
traffic control device by CalTrans, they are used to influence or control the route and speed
of vehicles, therefore, they function as a traffic control device and should be considered as
such. While speed humps are, by their function, a traffic control device, they have not been
approved for use by the California Traffic Control Devices Committee. The City of Pasadena
-2- pwO1\traffic\cornrnissn\agenda\93\0325 0315a
instructed staff that they have not had a liability situation since their speed hump program
was adopted January 10, 1984.
To prevent the possibility of proliferation of speed hump installation throughout City streets,
it is important to establish a clear and concise speed hump policy. Staff recommends the
following policy:
SPEED HUMP POLICY
Prior to the construction of a speed hump, the subject street section shall meet the following
criteria:
3.
4.
5.
A "speed hump petition" signed by at least sixty percent (60%) of the affected
residents shall be filed with the City of Temecula Department of Public Works, Traffic
Engineering Division.
The average traffic shall exceed 2,500 vehicles in a twenty-four (24) hour period.
The speed limit shall be no greater than twenty-five (25) mph as determined by State
law.
At least sixty percent (60%) of the surveyed vehicles are exceeding the twenty-five
(25) mph speed limit.
The subject street:
f.
g.
h.
Humps
or on 8
Humps
Shall not be over forty (40) feet wide, unless approved by City Engineer.
Shall not be more than two (2) traffic lanes.
Shall not have a grade greater'than five percent (5%) in the section where
humps are to be constructed.
Shall be at least one quarter (~A) mile in length.
Shall not have severe vertical or horizontal alignment features.
Shall not be a truck route or transit route.
Shall not be an important access route for emergency vehicles.
Shall not be listed on the City Circulation Plan, unless approved by City
Engineer.
shall not normally be constructed in isolated blocks along a continuous street
relatively short (< 800') cul-de-sac.
shall be constructed per the City of Temecula Standard Drawing.
-3- pwO1\traffic\cornmissn\agenda\93\0325 0315a
8. Humps are still experimental roadway features; therefore, additions, alternations or
removal of any hump may occur at any time.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City of Thousand Oaks reported that the shape, height, and spacing of the speed humps
were of great importance. In order to maintain an acceptable level of quality control, a group
of ternplates had to be made to use as a screed. The asphalt concrete had to be laid in
multiple lifts (layers) and a survey crew followed to assure that the desired height and shape
were achieved. Advance signs and pavement markings were then installed and the speed
hump was striped to increase its visual impact to the driver. A cost estimate for construction
and maintenance of speed humps follows:
Installation:
Speed Hump Construction
Signing and Striping
TOTAL
~1,000.00
9500,00
(each) Sl ,500.00
Maintenance: (yearly)
Asphalt Concrete Pavement
Signing and Striping
TOTAL
~100.00
~200.00
(each)$300.O0
CONCLUSION:
Studies have shown that speed humps have a significant impact on traffic. Humps are
effective in reducing speeds, but the impacts on deterring through traffic vary by location.
Responses from various municipalities indicate that the Fire & Emergency Services is most
effected by the installation of speed humps. An experimental pilot program could be installed
and evaluated after one (1) year to determine future use of speed humps.
ATTACHMENTS:
City of Pasadena Policies and Procedures for the installation of speed humps and
standard drawing.
City of Camarillo Resolution No. 85-24 pertaining to procedures governing the
construction of speed humps.
pwO1\traffic~cornrnissn\agenda\93\0325 0315
POLICIES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS
(Amended 11/25/85)
Speed humms are
certain streets
circumstances.
an aoDrooriate mechanism for reducina soeeds on
in Pasadena when Dromer!v installed under the right
Soeed humps can be considered for installation when the benefits
normaliV derived by residents from a local residential street are
significantly diminished by the sDeed of traffic (even though there
have been few or no reported accidents/ as evidence bV a
substantial majority of the abuttin~ residents si~nin~ a Detition
for the installation of sDeed humDs.
SDeed humps should only be used on local residential streets (i.e.,
streets where the primary function is to provide access to abuttin~
residences]. Experience has shown that the average motorist
reduces speed to approximately 16 MPH to traverse a 3-inch speed
hump. it would non be realistic to expect motorists on streets
intended to serve more than just abutting residents Lo reduce
speeds to 16 MPH every 300 feet or so. Such installations would
inevitably lead to extreme driver frustration and substantial
negative public reaction to the concept of using speed humps for
speed control, even at locations where they are clearly
appropriate. installation of speed humps on streets other than
local residential streets could have potentially severe traffic
safety consequences, almost certainly affect emergency services and
other service delivery activities, and likely create the diversion
of large amounts of through traffic onto local residential streets
which were not intended for that purpose.
The majority of street mileage in Pasadena can clearly be
classified as local residential streets. However, speed humps will
not normally be considered for streets which are classified as
collector streets or higher in the City's General Plan or which are
determined to provide a transportation service to the community
beyond that of simply providing access to the immediately abutting
residents. There are no absolute criteria that clearly distin-
guishes a purely local residential street from other relatively
low-volume streets that provide important services to residents in
addition to those immediately abutting the street in question.
However, streets carrying less than 1,000 vehicles per day are
almost always local residential street and streets carrying over
3,000 vehicles per day almost always provide important services to
the larger community. In the final analysis, the suitability of a
particular street for the installation of speed humps will have to
be determined on a case-by-case basis.
Speed humps should be installed on topical segments of local
residential streets. They will not normally be installed in
isolated blocks along a continuous street or on relatively short
(less than 800 feet] cul-de-sac streets. A substantial majority of
11.
residents on logical continuous segments of a local residential
street must support the installation of speed humps. Logical
segments are considered to be segments between arterial streets or
between natural discontinuities such as jogs in the street. The
cost of installing speed humps on relatively short cud-~e-sac
streets cannot normally be justified.
Streets e!iaible for the installation of soeed humms shall have a
soeed limit of 25 ~,~PH as determined in accordance with State Law.
The need to reduce speed substantially at speed humps would not
make these devices appropriate for streets posted higher than 25
MPH because of the severe speed differential such as installation
would create along the street. Severe differentials between the
speed of vehicles on a street are known to contribute to traffic
accidents.
The street shall be no more than one lane in each direction.
The street should not be a truck route or a nransit route.
The
street should not have Grades Greater than 5%. Proposed
policies 5, 6, 7, and 8 are identical to recommendations
made by the California Traffic Control devices Committee
on Pavement Undulations and are based on the best
information currently available.
SDeed humms wi'll only be considered for installation on local
residential streets determined by the Public Works DeDartment to
have adeauate vertical and horizontal alignment and sight distances
to safely accommodate the installation of speed humms.
The street should not be an important access route for emergency
vehicles. Fact6rs to be considered are:
(a) Whether the street is a primary route for emergency vehicles;
(b) Whether the installation of speed humps could cause a
significant delay in the response to emergencies.
Speed humps are still
additions, alterations,
occur at any time.
exDerimental roadway features; therefore,
or removal of any or all speed humms may
Adopted by Pasadena Board of Directors, January 10, 1984.
Amended by Pasadena Board of Directors, November 12, 1985.
A-2
PROCEDURES FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPEED HUMPS FY 1989-90
(Amended 2/14/89)
The Board's adopted policies and procedures for the
installation of speed humps will be made available to all
interested parties.
A representative of a local residential street who
believes the residents on his street will support the
installation of speed humps will submit a request in
writing to the Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Section which will consult with the Police and Fire
Departments in making a determination of whether the
street in question is eligible for further consideration
for the installation of speed humps (i.e., the street is
consistent with the Board's policies for the installation
of speed humps).
Upon determination that a street is not eligible for
speed humps, the representative(s) of the street will be
notified in writing giving the reason why the stree~ is
not eligible. The representative(s) of the street will
be given 15 days to appeal the decision in writing to the
Traffic and Transportation Engineer. A report of those
streets determined to be ineligible will be sent to the
City Manager for distribution to the Board. Staff will
review the original determination of streets which are
appealed. If staff concludes their original decision is
still valid, staff will present the appeal to the Board
of Directors' for final determination if representatives
of the street wish the matter to be referred to the
Board.
Upon determination that a street is eligible for further
consideration, the representative of the street will be
advised to submit a petition (forms provided by the City)
from the abutting property owners or residents indicating
that a clear majority (65% or more) support the installa-
tion of speed humps on their street. The petition forms
provided by the City will state: If there is subsequently
a desire by residents to remove the speed humps, the
humps will only be considered for removal after recaipZ
of a petition from a substantial majority (65% or more)
asking for the removal along with sufficient funds for
the removal up to $700 per hump.
The soonsot of the petition is required to contact every
resident of the abuttin~ properties on the subject
street. If a resident is against the speed humps, the
word "OPPOSED" will be noted on the merition signature
smace. If the soonsot is unable to contact a resident,
A-3
"~IO CONTACT" will be noted on the 0etition signature
space with the daVs and times that contact was attempted.
It is recFuired that the sponsor make at least two
attempts on separate daVs to contact a resident.
Any oetitions submitted orior to eligibility determina-
tion bv City staff will not be processed ahead of
schedule and shall be subject to re~ection if all
recuired information on the installation of soeed humos
is not included thereon.
To be considered for the program, petitions must be
received by the Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Section by
Upon verification of the petition, staff will make very
reasonable effort to notify the surrounding area of the
proposal for speed humps on a particular street. Such
notification may include information in City publications
(IN FOCUS), and neighborhood newsletters, when available,
and in some instances, special signs posted on the
street. If there is substantial opposition to the
installation of speed humps by people who travel the
street on a regular basis the Traffic and Transportation
Engineer will consult with the various parties and
attempt to reach consensus. If agreement cannot be
reached on a particular street, the matter will be
referred to the Board of Directors for final
determination.
Upon verification of the petition, the Traffic and
Transportation Engineering Section will make traffic
speed and volume measurements and review the traffic
accident history for the street in question. In
addition, the Traffic and Transportation Engineering
Section will submit the list of requests to the Police
and Fire Departments for their comments.
In the event the numher of requests for speed humps
exceeds the funds available, the Traffic and
Transportation Engineering Section will rank the requests
in a recommended order of priority and submit these
recommendations to the Board of Directors for approval.
The priority list recommended for approval will be based
on traffic accidents, speeds, traffic volumes, and
comments of the Police and Fire Departments. The Traffic
and Transportation Engineer will set forth the basis for
the recommended priorities in a report accompanying the
priority list.
Unless there is an overriding consideration such as high
incidence of speed-related accidents (a rare condition on
most local residential streets), priorities will normally
be established by multiplying the percentage of motorists
A-4
exceeding 25 MPH by the 24-hour traffic volume of the
street in question. A street yielding the highest
numerical value resulting from the above computation will
be considered to have ~he highest priority for speed
humps. Depending upon the number of petitions received
and the types of streets involved, it is possible that a
"cut-off speed" (perhaps an 85th percentile speed of 30
MPH) will be established below which streets will not be
considered for the program.
The physical installation of speed humps and the
associated traffic control devices shall conform to
design standards established by the Public Works and
Transportation Department.
Adopted by Pasadena Board of Directions, January 10, 1984.
.hended by Pasadena Board of Directors, March 30, 1987.
~ended by Pasadena Board of Directors, February 14, 1989.
A-5
REFLECTIVE LJN ITE ~
5TRIPES @ 6' D.C.
REFLECTIVE
' kc--z)
F~CE' L%~> 'A.c.
TZ~:SK COAT BIIdDER
8ECTIQIxJ A A
-~~lO~ NETfill ~ -
SPEED NUHF5 8NALL ~T BE PLACED GVE~
MATERGAT~, JU~TIG~ CNAI4BE~, ~.
~)EOGEOF SP~D HUt4p 5~LLBE 5 FE~HINIHUM
PLACED AT PRQPER~ LINES INST~D OF HID-LOT.
~HENEVER PO~IBt. E SPEED HUHPS SNA~
A~AC~T TQ STREET LIGNTS,
CITY OF PASADENA- PUBLIC WORKS
5IRK DA~ D
SPE~D HUflP
CHECKED:
APPROVED '~/-
n~ 7/,,'/x,~--
(-GUMS
LUb3~NIMG FLAGS
(FIRST WEEK)
'30" X ~O"
I..JARIdII,.IG SIGN
BLACK Old
YELLOLd
e" SEF, I F,.S
LETTERS
L, Jro(15) SlGlx, l
SIGI,,I LOCATIONS:
DIRECTED BY E~GlklEER.
8ECTIOi',J B-B
DEFT, - TRAFFIC DIV! SION
DRAWING NO.
805 58~551B CITY OF CAMARILLO P.05
A RESOLUTION OF THE rITZ COUNCIL O~ THS
CITY O~ C~iZLLQ PBI~AIRING TO PRCx~BDURE8
GOVERNING THE CONSTRUCTION OF 8PE~D HI)MP8
WRBREAS, the City of Camsrills has received
numerous requelLs for the construction of speed humps in
1~2REAS, the Cit~ o~ Camsrills has adopted a
Ge~eral ~lan which cofi=ains a Circulation Slamant designed
to solve the trl{~lo problems o~ the City lnuludin~ the
problem o~ excessive vehicular traffic in residential areas;
ttI~REA8# the procedures established by this
Resolution ere consistent ~ith the Circulation Element
said General Planf end
t~HERSA8, the City of Camarillu has the auchorit~
to construct speed humps ae ~art of its ~owere to construct
and mal~taine=ree~e! and
h~CRBAS, the Clt~ o~ CamsTills, in order to
pceven~ =be proZi~eratio~ o~ speed humps~ desires to limit
~heir construction to those 1Orations whic~ ace supported
1Dee1 residents and which demonstrate ~he potential fur
sffe~tive mpeed rsductionr
NOW, TRER~FOREe BE IT RESOlVeD BY THE CITY
OF TH~ CIT¥ Oe CANARXLLO A8
~,c~ionA,
The Lnitiation of requests Cot speed hum~ construc-
tions shall be in accordance with the following
(e) All requests shall originits ~rom the residents
of the street°
(b) All requests shall be in the form OEs
formal "Parities of Affimation' containing signatures o~
residen~e desiring the constructloft of speed hum~a on the
sub3ect street. Copies of slid petition shell be supplied
b~ the Engineering Services Department,
(up All petLtiane shall be circulated by the
residents themselves.
(d) A separate petition shall be used for each
street,
(e) Petitions shall be circulated st a minimum
smon~ those residents residing in buildings facing the
street end located within 75 feet of the floe oC curb on the
street.
(~) Completed petitions shell be delivered
tom Director of Eng ~neering Services, 601 Carmen Orlvem
Camsrills, Cali~ornie 93010.
33-G~-i993 16:SS 8~5 3885318 CITY OF CAMA~ILLO P.~4
{g) ~ach "Petl~ion of Af~itm·tion" shall con~·Ln
the signature· of resident· representing ·~ l·est ·ixty
percent (60l) o~ the re·idences (excluding churche· and
apartments) that race directly on the street and which are
located within 75 feet o~ the curb on the street,
{h) In the event thee a portion ot the a~ected
street is ~ronted by apartment buildings and/or ah~r~hss~
the ovners, m·neqers and/or tenants of am ~ay su~mit
a negative "Petition of Protest" to the Director o~
Engineeri~g Services requesting that speed humps not ~e
instilled on the~ street,
(1) Slid petition shell he in accordance
vith ~:oceduree re) through (f)~ e~ove.
(2) Etch "Petition of Protest" shsl~ contain
the lig~·turee lipresenting ·t lee·~ fortywenS percent
(411) of the apartment Units contained in buildings located
within 75 feet of the curb on ~he s~reet.
C3} The 0apartment of Engineering Services
shall place notices on each such buildin~ advisin9 of
this p~o~edure.
Section
Th· construction oE spied h~u~ps an public roads
shall Ve considered only if all the following conditions ate
mac over the entire proposed l~reet segment st deten~lned by
the Director o~ Begineating ·errices
(a} ;he average traffic volume exceeds 2,500
vehicle· in a 24 hour period,
(b} Kore than eiGhty-s·ven percent
the ·urveyed motorists exceed a speed of 25 m,p,h.
(c} ~he road is no~ over 40 feet in width.
(d) The road has · speed limit of 25 m,p,h,
in accordance with 5tare law or City Council action.
(e) The road has no mo~e than two traffic Lanes,
{E) The road is sither a residential road or
a loo·Z road ·s defined in the General Plah Circulation
Element,
{g) The approach speeds at the ~oos~ion of
the ~lrst potential speed hump must be able to be offec~ively
sontrolled vie a hyeiceZ design ~eaturl to the satisfaction
of th· Director o~ Engineering Service·,
Section 3. ProCedure·.
Xdoption o~ · request for speed h~Lmp constructions
shall he in ecCOrdan;e with the follo~ing ;totedurea;
(a) AZ~er each petition is reoe~ved~ the D~rec~or
of ~ngineering Services ·halls
03-0~-1885 16:54 805 ~88551~ CITV OF CAMA~ILL0 P.e5
(l} Verify that each petition contains the
requisite number oe signatures.
Obtain necessary transit date.
, (3) Varify compliance with all warrants
o
epeci~led in ~ection 2 f this ResOlution.
(4) Sneer the traffic data on n "Speed
Hump Frlortttaetio~ form" to calculate a relative 'Friorit~
Index" ~or each street.
(5) Rsguee~ the Venture County sherl~[*e
Departmen: ~o schedule eelactive speed enforcemen~ on
said street: a~ a ievll relative to ~he Priority index ~nr
earth Itrelt,
(b) All requests for speed humps thee aeet
ell pc 'siam and warrants ie apeclOSed in Sections 1 and ~
of this Resolution shell be taken before the streets end
Highways Committee. The C~mittes shell ~orward a recapman-
darins to construct or not to sonstrust speed humps =o the
Cit~ Council for action,
(c) The application shall be presented to the
City council via a =ormsl public hearing. The City Counci~
shall decide lZ the requested speed humps should ~e cons=fur ted.
(d) ~rior to =he City Council hearing, the cl~y
Clerk shale prepare s notice of said hearing inviting ell
interested l~dividuale to appear lad enter into relevant dis*
CusSions, These notices shall be mailed to all hc~ee along
the sub'sot street; they shall be posted along the eu~eot stree~
at a~l in~erse~tin~ s~reets, and along all significant diversion
etr,e~sy end a special paid advertisement shall be placed in a
newspaper of general CirculatiOn.
Design,
Speed humps shall be Cmnltruc~ed in conromance
with design guidslinel that have been elta~lishe~ by the
Director of 8ngineerinG Metrical st the time c~ l~ital!ation.
Section 5. Additions, Alterations and Re, morals.,
Additions, alterations cr remevale ~ any or
speed humps may QCCUr at any ~ime.
Meetion 6. Notification.
After the construction oJ speed humps on each
new street, the Director of Engineering Services shell
notify the Venture County Fire Department, the venture
County Sheriffle Department s~d Pruner ~bulenoe service of
said construCtion where they may incur delay,
A~PROVED AND ADO~TID this ~ day ot
ATTSST:
ITEM NO. 7
DISCUSSION ONLY
ITEM NO. 8
Traffic Engineer's Oral Report
ITEM NO. 9
Police Chief's Report
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive · Temecula, California92590
J,Sal Mu~oz
Mayor
Ron Roberts
Mayor Pro Tem
Ronald J. Parks
Councilmember
Jeff Stone
Councilmember
Patricia H. Birdsall
Councilmember
David F. Dixon
City Manager
(909) 694-1989
FAX (909) 694-1999
TO:
City Council
David Dixon / City Manager
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
From: Rick Sayre
Police Chief
Date:
Re:
March 18, 1993
Police Activity Report for February, 1993.
The following report reflects the Part I Crimes, Traffic Activity, and
miscellaneous activity occurring in the City of Temecula during the month
of February 1993.
As in previous months the Part One Stats are broken down by individual
districts within the City. This provides a greater understanding of the
criminal activity within the City for police staff deployment and for Council/
Commksion interest.
The Rod Run went off without a significant police problem. There were a
couple of minor incidents that resulted in arrests for alcohol related
violations. The persons involved were local minors. The budget for law
enforcement ended up being just under $6,000. The original projection was
at $10,000 which was based upon a fully attended event. This is an example
of the Police Departments desire to maintain a safe community event while
saving resources.
I'm certain you read about the assistance we provided to Oceanside P.D.
regarding a homicide that occurred in their City. This was not a lucky
vehicle stop but was one of many usually performed by the arresting officer.
The murder suspect, who once lived in Temecula, made an interesting
comment to the arresting officer. He advised him that he knew better than
to return to Temecula because the police were always stopping him because
of minor violations. I am proud that our officers are active in the field
making contacts with the citizens. I also insist that they treat the public with
respect and courtesy at all times.
FEBRUARY, 1993
PAGE TWO
Our K-9 has been replaced and the new dog is with Officer Mungle. They are awaiting a
slot in the next K-9 handlers academy. This is expected to be some time in April.
The suspect in the Hungry Hunter restaurant case was sentenced to five years in prison.
This was a quick case for the court to resolve as a couple of other counties have pending
I have received several inquiries about expanding the motor officer program from two to
three officers. I have no doubt the work lead exists. I would welcome your input.
There is a lot of concern over possible civil unrest that might be associated with the current
L.A. trials dealing with the Rodney King incident. We are prepared to go into an
emergency operation mode if needed. During the L.A. riot incident we did not experience
any civil unrest, however we will be prepared if needed.
Table of Contents
Statistical Information
Map of Districts ..................................... Page 01
February 1993 Number Totals ....................... ~..Page 02
Graphs
Part 1 Property Crimes ............................... Page 03
Part 1 Persons Crimes ................................ Page 04
Activity Breakdown by District ....................... Page 05
Burglaries by District ............................... Page 06
Burglary Comparison .................................. Page 07
Arrest Statistics .................................... Page 08
Miscellaneous Activity ............................... Page 09
Traffic Violations ................................... Page 10
Traffic Collisions ................................... Page 11
Narcotic Activity .................................... Page 12
District C
Persons 0
Property3
Total 3
District D
Persons 7
Property 21
Total 28
City of Temecula
Part I Crimes by Reporting District
February 1993
PAGE 1
Persons 5
Total 20
District A
Persons 1
Properly 10
Total 11
District B
Persons 2
Property 10
Total 12
District E
Persons 1
Property 15
Total 16
Persons 1
Total 8
District F
Persons 0
Property6
Total ~
CRIME
HOMICIDE
RAPE
ROBBERY
FELONY ASSAULT
TOTAL PERSONS
BURGLARY
GRAND THEFT
AUTO THEFT
ARSON
TOTAL PROPERTY
~RAND TOTAL
HAZARD CITES
NON-HAZARD CITES
PARKING CITES
TOTAL CITES
DIST. PEACE
SHOPLIFT
PE'I'T'Y THEFT
VANDALISM
MISD. ASSAULT
ALARMS
PUBLIC INTOX.
DUI
TOTAL
T/C INJURY
T/C NON-INJURY
FATAL TIC
TOTAL TIC
RESID. BURGLARY
COMM, BURGLARY
OTHER BURGLARY
VEHICLE BURGLARY
MISD. ARRESTS
FELONY ARRESTS
TOTAL ARRESTS
TOTAL ACTIVITY
MONTHLY $TATS
A B C D
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 I 0 3
0 I 0 4
1 2 ol 7
2 5 0 5
6 1 0 5
2 4 3 11
0 0 0 0
I 10 10 31
1~ 12 3 28
40 21 37 38
48 34 20 22
8 4 5 7
I 961 59~ 62 67~
3 20 5 19
1 0 0 7
2 0 3 6
5 4 1 11
2 9 2 9
55 28 5 37
3 4 0 2
3 12 0 2
I 741 77 16 931
I 4 15
0 0
I 51 5 15
1 2 0 2
1 3 0 3
0 0 0 0
3 1 0 2
15 30 0 26
8 5 0 13
I 192~ I 86| 203
Month of: Feb. 93
E F G H TOTAL
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 2 0 2
0 0 1 0 6
I 0 2 1 9
I 0 5 1 17
5 2 6 0 25
3 2 3 4 24
7 2 6 3 38
0 0 0 0 0
151 61 15 7 87
16 6 20 8 104
5 5 158 18 322
8 7 41 16 196
11 1 8 3 47
24~ 13{ 207 37 565
24 12 22 3 108
0 0 1 0 9
9 1 4 3 28
6 2 19 1 49
8 3 4 2 39
22 4 34 15 200
0 0 3 0 12
1 1 1 0 20
701 23 88 24 465
i i 2 0 6
7 6 57
0 0 0
9~ 31 91 61 63
4 2 6 0 17
0 0 0 0 7
1 0 0 0 1
0 1 1 4 12
8 7 11 4 101
6 5 6 3 46
14 12 17 71 147
119| 45 324~ 75~ 1197
Page 2
8J~j
o ~s
ITEM NO. 10
Fire Chief' s Report
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE ERENCE:
JUNE GREEK, GII'Y CLERK
JI~{dRIGI{'[, DIVISION CHIEF ~,
FIRE SERVICES
I~CH 15, 1993
FIRE SERVICES 1992 YF, AR ENI) REPORT
Attached are copies of our 1992 year end report which I
would like for your staff to distribute to the Public/Traffic
Safety Commissioners.
Your assistance is appreciated. Thanks.
CITY OF
TEMECULA
:¸,%
FIRE SERVICES
1992 YEAR END REPORT
J.M. HARRIS
FIRE CHIEF
- RIVERSIDE COUNTY
......FIRE DEPARTMENT
210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE * PERRXS, CALIFORNIA 92570 * (909) 657-3183
J.M. HARRIS
FIRE CHIEF
March 12, 1993
Temecula City Council and
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Attn: Mr. David Dixon
City Manager
SUBJECT: Temecula Fire Services 1992 Year End Report
The following information is being provided as the Temecula Fire
Services 1992 Year End Report.
Fire Department units responded to 3,176 incidents during 1992,
which is an 8% increase over 1991 responses. Medical aids still
account for the largest portion/percentage of calls (42% were
medical emergencies).
There were two major incidents in 1992 which will remain embedded
in the memories of all those involved, as well as the citizens of
Temecula.
The first occurred early on the morning of June 2, 1992, a high
speed chase ended in tragedy. The incident proved to be quite
challenging to all the emergency workers involved as it was very
traumatic with 5 fatalities and 12 injuries. Two of the injured
were trapped inside their vehicle and it took an extensive extri-
cation procedure to remove them. In all, 12 patients would be
transported to area hospitals by ground and air ambulances.
Due to the location and the numerous bystanders, it was an
extremely emotional scene, adding to the stressful situation
already felt by all emergency personnel. Despite the adversity,
the scene ran very smooth with numerous agencies working togeth-
er. Resources committed included; one division chief, one batta-
lion chief, one truck company, five engine companies, one squad,
six paramedic ground ambulances, and two air ambulances.
The second was durinu ~he afternoon of Septembel 9, 1992, when a
fire started just south of the city limits. Consuming 3,000 plus
acres and one home, the Rainbow fire took five days to bring
under control. Burning in 50 year old vegetation, the fire
burned with extreme intensity. Although one home was lost, many
more were saved. It took combined resources and efforts from
several agencies to finally bring it under control.
Fire prevention and education continues to be a top priority.
The Fire Prevention Captain conducted numerous school programs
and attended community fairs and special events. Each program
was tailored to specific age groups and fire prevention and home
safety materials were distributed.
As in years past, Weed Abatement is also handled by the Fire
Prevention Captain. Starting in early spring, vacant properties
were posted with a notice to clear the property of weeds. In
addition, these notices were also sent to each property owner.
There were 350 parcels posted in 1992 of which 75 had to be
cleared by private vendors due to noncompliances. Property
owners were then assessed for the work performed by the contrac-
tors.
The Trauma Intervention Program (T.I.P.) officially began
operation in August. This unique program provides an invaluable
service to the citizens and emergency workers of this community=.
By providing emotional and practical support to traumatized
victims and their families, it frees the emergency personnel tb
concentrate on their duties and fills the void often felt by the
workers when leaving the scene.
In October, the Breathing Support vehicle purchased by the City
was placed into service. This state-of-the-art apparatus
provides a means to fill air cylinders at the scene of an emer-
gency and can provide lighting and air pressure to operate air
operated tools during fire or rescue operations. Because of it's
proven design, the County plans to purchase future breathing
supports using the same specifications.
Taking into consideration the growth of the City of Temecula
since 1989, the ever increasing influx of people and businesses,
it is a constant challenge and a commitment for the Temecula Fire
Services to train, update, and improve the emergency services we
provide to this fast growing City.
If you should have any questions regarding the aforementioned
please feel free to contact me.
J. M. HARRIS
County Fire Chief
By: Wright
Western Division Chief
JMW:rrb
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
E
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE * PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 * (714) 657-3183
J. M. HARRIS March 10t 1993
FIRE CHIEF
Temecula City Council
Temecula Public / Traffic Safety CommissiOn
Mr. David Dixon
Temecula City Manager
TEMECULA FIRE SERVICES
February 1993 Activity Report
The following statistics reflect the monthly fire suppression and
fire prevention activity of your fire department for the month of
February, 1993.
Emergency responses have been routine during this reporting period.
Due to the wet driving conditions, traffic collisions increased
105% over last month.
Issuance of sand bags to the citizens of Temecula from the City
Fire Stations amounted to approximately 1300 bags, all to help
prevent further erosion and impending property damage for both
business and residential areas. Though more rain came, the
clearance work done to that point in the creek allowed the water to
flow through our community without overflowing the creek banks.
Fire prevention activities continued in many areas, including
community activities, school programs, business fire safety
inspections, and issuance of burning permits.
Mike Harris, Chief
Riverside county Fire
Mark Brodowski
Battalion Chief
Temecula Battalion
TEHECUL~ FIRE DEPART!/ENT
MONTHLY INCIDENT STATISTICS FOR PUBLIC SkFETY COI~ISSION
Month February Year 1993
FIRE CONTROL ACTIVITIES
Structure Fires
Vehicle Fires
Vegetation Fires
Other Fires
Medical Aids
Traffic Collisions
False Alarms
Fire Menace Standby
PSA's
Assists and Covers
TOTALS:
STATION #12 STATION #73 TOTAL
0 0 0
1 1 2
0 0 0
3 0 3
67 29 96
31 6 37
23 4 27
3 3 6
17 3 20
5 20 25
150 66 216
STATION FIRE PREVENTION 8TATION #12
Community Activities
School Programs
Fairs and Displays
Company Inspections
LE-38 Inspections
Fire Investigation
Burning Permits Issued
STATION #73 TOTAL
I 1 2
5 1 6
0 i 1
74 189 263
0 DNA 0
0 2 2
28 1 29
T O T A L S: 108 195 303
FIRE PREVENTION CAPTAIN ACTIVITIES
Community Activities - Miscellaneous
School Programs
Fairs and Displays
Company Inspections
LE-38 Dooryard Vegetation Inspections
Fire Cause Investigation
Burning Permits Issued
Training
Administrative Work
Certificate of Occupancy Inspections
Vacant Property Posted
Volunteer In Prevention Hours
TOTAL HOURS
2 6
2 15
1 4
4 5
38
6L
7 9
6 56
B15-1 (6/92) By: S. Zimmerman, FC Date: 3-2-93
~lnDe~ o~ pI~ol ~ t~TAT~ l~uoT~onP~ / ~a q~s =ol ~no ITT~
· uea!~O aaunosa¥ looNaS 'OUUgAaN
A~ndeO q~!~ sXoq pa~e!Aua~u! 'ladlau!ud
iooqas ~o ~sanbau uod~ '~aa~ aq~ Je~a
s~oedsns elqlssod sa pe!~!~uap! sAoq I~aaAeS
· ~uep!au! ~o e~!~ ~a pa~uodaa euoN 'sau!l
~o s~ueplau! laaaAas paoueluadxe tooqoS
SNOI~D~H~SRI
OG~L-~69
:aNOHd
elnuqna uou~
sunoH
(S)NOSHad ~DVtNOD
S~NVdIDIih'~fd
9NIGN~i~
SNOSHaa aO aDV
9NIGN~I~
SNOSHad tO #
14'fdDOHd ~O H~DNa~
Aa~uad s~opae~
ooqaS eIPP!a alnae~al
aO NOI~VDO~
ldd O0: L
If~dDOHd aO
[66L '0L Auenuqej
tfd'dgOad ~0 a~VG
aulJ q4-!~ 15uiAald al!uoAnC
~DOHd aO
I ~aaas x&xAz~a~ savaooaa u~aoz&~onaa / saz~zal ox~aaa ~aoa~am
(I6/~I)
~0-6-~_ :~}9,~(I Ua 'u~wj8mw!Z 'S :,{~
'soaXoldsZ ~a!J~s!O IooqaS Pe!}IuD
elnaemaI ao~ aAe~ q$IeeH lenuue puoaaS
~(]N~D~ JO AH~rN~LrlS
SNOIIDRHISNI
~ID~dS
OEEO-88L (606) :HNOH6
L
~InPV
OOL
sunoH G'E
(S)NOSH~d
S~N~aIDI~H~a
'idXG HMIa aO #
DNIGNai~V
SNOSH~d JO
SNOSM~g ~0 #
14'd'dDOHd JO HIDN~
AemMaed s~opee~
ioo~aS elPP]~ elnaemsl
N'~tOOHd
~0 NOI~DO~
I~d 00:9 - O~:Z~
E66L 'LL AaenJqaj
k~PaDOMd ~0 HNI~
l,{kPdDOHd JO H~Q
N~fdDOHd ~0 RdZ~
(1:6/~1:)
E6-Z-~ :a~.lCl 33 'uecuaacuw!Z 'S -'Ell
slnos~s& el pzl~ot ~ I~TAT~o~ I~uoT~lonp~ / ~a qols ~ol ~no IITa
'un8 po¥
~a snld 'slooqas Aaa4uamala 19sol ~ ~a
paAalds!p panbS anasaa soNa4sdeoMS 'ouO-3
Aq peJosuods ~sa~uoD 5u!joloa ep!~
SROIID~H~SNI
q~IDSdS
90L~-86~ :HNOHd a~!q~ a!uuV
OL
~InpV - iooqaS-aud
acuapua}$V una poa snid 'slooqss o4 sa!J~ue 0098
sXap ~
(S)NOSHad
S~N~dlDI~lfdd
'~daO HHIa aO #
9NION~
SNOSHHd aO
9NION~V
sNosaaa ao #
I41f'dDOHd aO H~DNaq
uMoZ PlO u! unW po¥ 'alnaaaaZ u!
slooqoS Aua~uemet3 pue slooqaS-aud sno!uBA
JO NOI~VDOq
~66L '9~ - 9Z AJanJqaj
~DOHd JO ~&~Q
~-so~-uo3 iSu!uolo3 auO-J
I4~fl:{OOMd JO
s~Jodel:! le~O uo!ss!ujujo3
L L 'ON IAI3/I