HomeMy WebLinkAbout032100 CC MinutesMINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
MARCH 21, 2000
The City Council convened in a regular meeting at 7:00 P.M., on Tuesday, January 25, 2000,
in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula,
California.
Present: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Naggar, Pratt, and Stone.
Absent: Councilmember: Roberrs.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Iva Brough.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor James Field of First Baptist Church of Temecula.
ALLEGIANCE
The salute to the Flag was led by Councilman Pratt.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Video Presentation of State of the City Address
For the attending and viewing public, Mayor Stone requested that the State of the City Address
video be shown at this time.
There being no objection to Mayor Stone's request, Consent Calendar will be considered later
in the meeting and that Agenda Item Nos. 18 and 19 will be considered out of order.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Ms. Charolette Fox, 32800 Hupa Drive, representing the Girl Scouts, Troop 863, advised
that the Troop was in attendance in order to work on its Active Citizenship.
B. Dr. Leslie Navran, 43027 Corte Fresca, relayed his and his neighbors dismay with the
sounds emanating from the open-air bar on Front Street. In response to Dr. Navran, Mayor Pro
Tem Comerchero noted that the Planning Department staff is exploring the matter.
C. In an effort to maintain the rural atmosphere and not viewing it as aesthetically pleasing
and/or compatible, Ms. Rowena Cook, 44065 Sheldon Court, requested that the Council
reconsider to not install the stop sign at the Santiago/Old Town Front Street/First Street
intersection.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Having attended the Murrieta Creek Committee meeting, Councilman Pratt briefly
apprised the Council of on-going efforts by this Committee.
R:\Minutes\032100
1
B. Councilman Naggar welcomed the Japanese exchange students to the City of
Temecula.
C. In response to Councilman Naggar's concern, Public Works Director Hughes advised
that Caltrans is planning to rehabilitate the surface of 1-15, both north and southbound lanes
within City limits, and that the project should commence the end of May.
D. Having recently attended a National League of Cities Conference in Washington, D.C.,
Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero commented on issues of discussion such as the elimination of
racism in the United States and the issue of taxation of the Internet.
On behalf of the Temecula Area Women's Club, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero presented
to the Council a miniature version of the Mission bell that was dedicated and placed at the
Temecula Museum.
E. Mayor Stone commended the Police Department on its efforts associated with the
E.R.A.C.I.T. Program, a program which deters drunk driving in the City.
F. As per the Temecula Valley High School tennis coach, Mayor Stone advised staff that
most of the lights at the tennis courts are not properly functioning and requested staff to explore
the matter.
G. Commenting on the aesthetically pleasing appearance of all entrances to the City, Mayor
Stone commented on the need for median improvements on Winchester Road and requested
that the Community Services Commission review this matter.
H. In response to Mayor Stone, Deputy City Manager Thornhill addressed several
inaccuracies printed in a local newspaper with regard to the Riverside County Planning
Commission and the City's continual efforts to review County projects, advising that two staff
members have been appointed to the RCIP and will be involved where appropriate.
At this time, Council Business Item Nos. 18 and 19 were considered together and out of order.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
Aclenda Item Nos. 18 and 19 were considered toqether and out of order
18 Growth ManaGement Proqram
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Approve the Growth Management Program.
19 Residential Building Permit Moratorium
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 To not adopt a Residential Building Permit Moratorium but proceed with a
Growth Management Program.
City Manager Nelson reviewed the staff report (of record) and referenced the City's goals with
regard to the Growth Management Program.
R:\Minutes\0321 O0
2
By way of a PowerPoint presentation, Deputy City Manager Thornhill commented on the
strategic goals and action plan of the Growth Management Program, noting the following:
that staff is actively involved in the update of the County's Integrated
Plan; that two staff members have been solely dedicated to monitor the County
Integrated Plan
that monthly progress reports will be provided to the City Council
that community participation in the County's planning efforts is greatly welcomed
and appreciated
that information with regard to the Integrated Plan would be posted on the City's
Web with links to the County
that a quarterly newsletter, if approved by the City Council, will be published and
distributed to the residents; first publication to be completed by May
that, as per City Council direction, another community survey will be completed
that County staff will update the City Council on its Integrated Plan on a quarterly
basis
that collaboration with other Temecula Valley jurisdictions is encouraged (School
District, City of Murrieta, and other agencies, etc.)
that during the Integrated Plan process, staff is requesting that the County not
approve any project that would increase traffic above the existing General Plan
densities
that the redistribution of land uses will be closely examined
that collaboration with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians is encouraged
In conclusion, City Manager Nelson noted that the proposed Growth Management Plan is an
aggressive and proactive Plan; that it will address the future challenges the growth will have on
the City; and that staff are proposing the following measures to ensure the success of the Plan:
to appoint City Councilmembers and staff to attend all County of
Riverside Integrated Plan meetings as well as any proposed developments that
offset the City
to solely dedicate two staff positions to work on the County's Integrated
Plan process and development within the County
to prepare and distribute quarterly publications to the community
regarding the County's Integrated Plan process; first publication to be distributed
in May
to conduct a citizens' survey and to hold quarterly workshops regarding
the Integrated Ran
to complete a focused review of the City's General Plan; to review the
Development Impact Fees in order to explore open space acquisitions
to continue to aggressively pursue the City's Capital Improvement
Program
to continue with Category I and II street striping and paving improvements
to aggressively pursue Measure A Funds for regional road improvements to
ensure the City receives its equitable share
to continue efforts to establish a regional Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
(TUMF) in order to provide the ability to build more regional infrastructure
improvements within the City; to improve traffic signal operation hired a
technician solely dedicated to improve traffic signal coordination throughout the
City.
R:\Minutes\032100
3
Viewing the City's growth, as a developed City, appropriate, and confident that the City has
measures in place to address and mitigate the traffic impacts of growth within the City, City
Manager Nelson noted that it would be inappropriate for the County to grow as an urban area
creating impacts to the City, ones which the City will be unable to address and mitigate. Mr.
Nelson requested the approval of the City's Growth Management Program.
With regard to the moratorium, Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed staff's opposition to a
moratorium and its support of the Growth Management Program.
At this time, Mayor Stone invited public input.
Although he had left the meeting, it was noted the Mr. Greg Morrison was in support of the
Growth Management Program,
The following individuals spoke in opposition to a building moratorium and relayed their support
of the Growth Management Program:
Mr. Bob Lopshire 40244 Atmore Cour~
Ms. Tomi Arbogast 27450 Ynez Road (representing Chamber
of Commerce
Mr. Bill Harker 31130 South General Keamey Road
(noted that recent infrastructure has greatly addressed the City traffic
congestion concerns.)
Mr. Rudy Martinez 43655 Buckeye Road
(addressed population growth and demographic diversity and encouraged
consensus on these issues and relayed his support of the Growth
Management Program.)
Mr. Doug Woelke 27513 Jimson Circle
Mr. Harold Provin 44750 Villa Del Sun
Mr. Dennis Frank 37820 Spring Valley Road
Mr. Paul Jacobs 32370 Corte Zamora
At 8:41 P.M., this time, Mayor Stone called a short recess and reconvened the meeting at 8:52
P.M.
Ms. Joan Sparkman
Mr. Sam Alhadeff
Mr. William Kelley
Mr. Bob Newsom
Ms. Lori Stone-Rubin
Ms. Maryann Edwards
40213 Colony Drive
27555 Ynez Road, #203
31542 Via San Carlos
28910 Rancho California Road, #104
42913 Calle Londe
(encouraged City participation in the development of the County
Integrated Plan.)
Mr. Ray Johnson 26785 Camino Seco
(encouraged strengthening the Growth Management Plan to ensure
mitigation by the County.)
Mr. David Alvarado 33432 Corte Ebano
Mr. William Griffith 15751 Rockfield Blvd., #100
Mr. Wilyim Johnson 29400 Rancho California Road
Further addressing the City's proposed Growth Management Program, Ms, Adrian McGregor,
34555 Madera del Playa, commented on the County's feasibility to mitigate traffic impacts to the
City; voiced concern with regard to high density; and addressed future water effects.
R:\Minutes\032100
4
Mr. Gene Frick, 17205 Monterey Road, encouraged staff to explore the rate of growth, noting
that the City's current growth rate is not sustainable.
The following individuals spoke in support of a moratorium:
Ms. May Lorah 41886 Corte Lara
(Citizens First of Temecula Valley, relayed her
support of a temporary moratorium during the implementation period of the
Growth Management Program.)
Ms. Michelle Anderson 43797 Barletta Street
(relayed her support of a temporary moratorium.)
Ms. Pare Miod 31995 Via Saltio
(Citizens First of Temecula Valley)
(submitted a petition in support of a moratorium and relayed her support of an
emergency moratorium limited to the construction of new permits not those
already issued for residential track homes in the City or County; commented on
the need for open space.)
Mr. Clif Hewlett 42890 Calle Corto
(De Luz 2000/Save Walker Basin)
(supported a moratorium or to implement the Growth Management
Program but ensuring it has the needed measure to ensure successful
Enforcement; recommended that the County stop all further residential
Development in the County until the completion of the Integrated Plan.)
Mr. Robert Wheeler 29090 Camino Alba
(spoke in support of a moratorium or the implementation of a Growth
Management Program which clearly address mitigation measures to
ensure enforceability of the Plan.)
In response to Mr. John Lynn, 32237 Placer Belair, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that
staff does provide input and comments on County projects which could impact the City and will
continue to do so.
There being no additional public comments, Mayor Stone welcomed City Council input.
Advising that staff and the Councilmembers have expended a tremendous effort in the creation
of this Growth Management Action Plan, Councilman Naggar referenced the recent Traffic
Circulation Element update, noting that it is the City's goal to ensure that all levels of service E
and F be eliminated by buildout.
To ensure the City the ability to measure the success of this Action Plan, Councilman Naggar
offered the following comments and requested the following amendments:
inform the City Council of all construction, at each level of approval, within the
sphere of influence;
1. Inter-AqencV Coordination - A. 6. include verbiage as follows: that any
amendments that would result in increased traffic levels and which were not able
to be mitigated would be denied;
1. A. 6. - should read as follows: Deny General Plan amendments, change of
zones, Specific Plan amendments, or Specific Plan approvals within the City ...
increased traffic levels should be defined as anything higher than service level D;
that during the Riverside County Integrated Plan process, the Council will review
any Specific Plans, General Plan amendments, zone changes that will increase
density in the County;
R:\Minutes\032100
5
It was noted by City Attomey Thorson that General Plan amendments, change of
zone, and Specific Plan amendments require City Council approval;
1. A. 8b. should read as follows: Proactively phase and fund infrastructure
to keep pace with paralleled proposed development projects;
2. Redirect Urban Development to Urban Areas - City Council direct the
Planning Commission to approve projects at the lowest allowable zoning
density and to take into account any amenities the project may be
offering;
General Plan Committee should evaluate and determine whether or not to
change the estimated number of dwelling units in the City, should review entitled
properties, vesting rights, and determine whether or not it is appropriate for the
City may regulate nonentitled building permits;
4, Traffic Circulation System Improvements - direct the Planning
Commission to consider strict phasing restrictions;
4. B. 1. - should read as follows: Determine how the RCIP and CETAP
will address and miti.qate the impact that future growth will have on the
1-15 and 1-215 freeway system; it was recommended to involve neighboring
cities;
4. C, 3, - should read as follows: Reevaluate DIF fees to ensure that
appropriate mitigation fees are being charged and determine when the fees are
charfled;
It was noted by Deputy City Manager Thornhill that the City adheres to legal
provisions as it relates to the charging of these fees;
5. Maximize existing Transportation Network Efficiency - aggressively
pursue traffic signal coordination; realign 79N to a City road to acquire jurisdiction;
5. B. 2c. - immediately pursue the electric trolley system as well as other
transportation alternatives as noted in d - i.
Councilman Naggar reiterated that although he is not desirous of suing the County, it was
requested that City Attorney Thorson explore the City's litigation options. With regard to
Diamond Valley Lake, Mr. Naggar commented on the position the City must take to prevent the
potential impacts this project could have on Winchester Road. As to Ms. McGregor's comments
relative to water issues, Councilman Naggar requested that this matter be explored in more
detail. It was suggested that a workshop be scheduled with the Water District to discuss the
District's ability to meet the water needs in light of the proposed growth. In closing,
Councilman Naggar relayed his opposition to a moratorium if his proposed amendments were
included in the Action Plan and recommended that the Plan be reviewed in one year.
Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero echoed Councilman Naggar's comments with regard to Diamond
Valley Lake and its potential impact on Winchester Road and as well spoke in suppo~ of a
workshop with the Water District. With regard to the Action Plan, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero
made the following comments/amendments:
1. Inter-A~encv Coordination - A. 4d. - concurred with conducting
another citizen survey, noting that the wording of the survey is critical and, therefore,
requested that the survey be reviewed by the City Council prior to it being distributed to
the public;
A. 6. - requested that durin¢l the RCIP planninq process be deleted from
Paragraph;
R:\Minutes\032100
6
3. Preserve Open Space to create Buffers and protect Acidculture and
Valuable Habitat Areas - determine how much property is available within City
limits in the event funds were available and determine a price per acre;
3. A. 4. - should read as follows: Apply for and utilize State Bond Funds
(Proposition 12 and 13 funds) ...
4. Traffic Circulation System Improvements - A. 3b. - critical that this be
pursued;
4. A. 4b. - because of common borders and issues, include conversation with the
City of Murrieta in an effort to achieve a common opinion and goal which may
then be presented to the County;
4. C. 2 - spoke in support of independent traffic analysis;
5. Maximize existinq Transportation Network Efficiency - B. 2b. - provide the
infrastructure necessary to provide these fuels and keep abreast of technological
advances (CNG stations).
Councilman Pratt requested that a traffic count be conducted in order to obtain a baseline;
commended staff on their efforts with regard to the Action Plan; and with regard to regional
improvements to circulation systems, suggested freeway management.
Mayor Stone relayed his opposition to a moratorium. After consulting the City Attorney, Mayor
Stone reiterated that existing development agreements or vesting Tentative Tract Maps are
exempt from a moratorium or building caps, advising that legal findings must be established in
order to impose a moratorium.
By way of overheads, Mayor Stone clarified the impact County development has and continues
to have on the City, advising that the City has approved 425 single-family homes since
incorporation (1989), noting that the County, within the same timeframe, has approved 8,000.
He noted that County anticipates to approve another 30,000 homes and the City another 3,500.
Mr. Stone emphasized that the City must take a proactive approach to ensure the County will be
able to mitigate impacts to the City.
Mayor Stone relayed his opposition to any increase in sales tax for the buying of open space
and suggested that the exchange of land in lieu of fees to increase open space be explored.
For Mayor Stone, City Manager Nelson advised that the Development Impact Fees will be
reviewed by the City Council in April.
in closing, Mayor Stone reiterated his opposition to a moratorium and support for the Growth
Management Action Plan and echoed Councilman Naggar's suggestion that this Action Plan be
readdressed in one year.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero moved to approve the Growth Management Program.
The motion was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero moved to deny the residential building permit
moratorium. The motion was seconded by Councilman Pratt and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent.
At 11:08 P.M., Mayor Stone called a short recess and reconvened the meeting at
11:16 P.M.
R:\Minutes\032100
7
CONSENT CALENDAR
I Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATON:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of January 11, 2000.
3 Resolution Approvina List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 2000
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurers Report as of January 31, 2000.
5 License Aqreement between the Temecula Town Association and the City of Temecula
for office space at the Temecula Community Center
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the License Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Temecula
Town Association (TTA) for use of office space at the Temecula Community Center
(TCC),
6 Adoption of Resolution initiatin.q annexation proceedinqs for the Vail Ranch Specific Plan
Area - PA00-0021
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Make a finding that the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted on July 28, 1998 for
the Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation (PA98-0205) addresses all environmental
impacts associated with this project;
R:\Minutes\0321 O0
8
6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-20
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE
COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS REORGANIZING THE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN INHABITED
TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AS THE VAIL RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE
CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO
INCLUDE SAID TERRITORY WITHIN THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND TO DETACH SAID
TERRITORY FROM CSA 143, CSA 1~i2, AND THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; DESIGNATED AS
PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0021
6.3 Direct staff to prepare and submit application and associated materials for
annexation to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).
Councilman Pratt abstained with regard to this Item.
7 Review of Citv's Conflict of Interest Code
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CODE
8 Third Amendment to Aqreement with P & D Consultants for Contract Building Inspectors
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve a Third Amendment to an Agreement for Consultant Services with P & D
Consultants in an amount not to exceed $76,075 to provide supplemental building
inspection services to the Building and Safety Department for the remainder of the
fiscal year.
9
Substitute AGreements and Bonds for Public Iml~rovements in Tract No. 25892 (located
on the south side of Pauba Road between Ynez Road and Marclarita Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Accept the Substitute Subdivision Improvement Agreement and replacement
securities for Public Improvements in Tract No. 25892;
R:\Minutes\032100
9
10
9.2 Authorize release of the Faithful Performance, Labor and Materials, and Subdivision
Monumentation securities on file;
9.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Award of Construction Contract for Pala Road BridGe Improvements Environmental
Mitiqation- Project No. PW97-15(EM)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Award the construction contract for Pala Road Bridge lmprovements Environmental
Mitigation - Project No. PW97-15(EM) - to Habitat West, Inc. of Escondido,
California, in the amount of $74,163.00 contingent on the acquisition of the access
easement and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
10.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $7,416.30 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
11
Reimbursement AGreement with Eastern Municipal Water District First Street Extension -
Project No. PW95-08
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve the Reimbursement Agreement with Eastern Municipal Water Distdct
(EMWD) for the cost to install sewer force mains and a pump station made
necessary for the construction of First Street Extension - Project No. PW95-08 -
and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
12
Reimbursement Aqreement with Rancho California Water District First Street Extension -
Project No. PW95-08
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Approve the Reimbursement Agreement with Rancho California Water District
(RCWD) for the cost to relocate and install water improvements made necessary by
the construction of First Street Extension (Bridge) - Project No. PW95-08 - and
authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
Mayor Stone abstained with regard to this issue,
13 Professional Services AGreement for First Street Extension - Project No. PW95-08
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement for Construction Support Services -
Project No. PW95-08 - to Frederic R. Harris, Inc. for $30,790.00 and authorize the
Mayor to execute the contract;
13.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $3,079.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Mayor Stone abstained with regard to this Item.
R:\Minutes\032100
10
14 Professional Services Aqreement for First Street Extension - Project No. PW95-08
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve a Professional Services Agreement for Structural Bridge Inspection for the
First Street Extension - Project No. PW95-08 - to Caltrep Engineering Corporation
for $45,402.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
14.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $4,540.20, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount.
Mayor Stone abstained with regard to this Item.
15 Completion and Acceptance of Street Name SicIn Replacement - Proiect No. PW98-18
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Accept the project Street Name Sign Replacement- Project No. PW98-18 as
complete;
15.2 Authorize the Clerk to file the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond,
and accept a 12-month Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
15.3 Release the Labor and Materials Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the
Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed.
16 Completion and Acceptance for Traffic Si.qnal Installation, MarClarita Road at Pauba Road,
Marqarita Road at Pio Pico Road - Project No. PW98-12 & PW98-13
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Accept the project Traffic Signal Installation, Margarita Road at Pauba Road,
Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road - Project No. PW98-12 & PW98-13 as complete,
as constructed by DBX, Inc. of Temecula, California;
16.2 Direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion;
16.3 Accept the one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
17 Traffic Awareness Now (T.A.N.) Fundinq Request
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Approve the request for financial participation in an amount not to exceed $15,000
for the Traffic Awareness Now courteous driving campaign.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-5 and
8-17 (Item Nos. 6 and 7 were pulled for separate discussion). The motion was seconded by
Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Mayor Stone who
abstained with regard to Item Nos. 12, 13, and 14 and Councilman Roberts who was absent.
R:\Minutes\032100
11
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS SEPARATELY DISCUSSED
Adoption of Resolution initiatinq annexation proceedinqs for the Vail Ranch Specific Plan
Area - PA00-0021
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
Make a finding that the Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted on July 28, 1998
for the RedhawkNail Ranch Annexation (PA98-0205) addresses all
environmental impacts associated with this project;
6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-20
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE
COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS REORGANIZING THE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN INHABITED
TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AS THE VAIL RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE
CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO
INCLUDE SAID TERRITORY WITHIN THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND TO DETACH SAID
TERRITORY FROM CSA 143, CSA 152, AND THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; DESIGNATED AS
PART OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0021
6.3
Direct staff to prepare and submit application and associated materials for
annexation to the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).
Deputy City Manager Thornhill presented the staff report (of record).
Councilman Pratt advised that he has received communication from the Redhawk residents,
expressing concern that LAFCO may not approve the proposed annexation for Vail Ranch.
In response to Councilman Pratt, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that staff has
investigated the proposal with LAFCO and that staff is of the opinion that LAFCO would not
accept the application of annexation without giving it serious consideration. Mr. Thornhill
reiterated that the City is not promoting this annexation, noting that the request has come from
the Vail Ranch residents.
Mr. Ken Johnson, 44728 Corte Valencia, requested that the City Council temporarily withdraw
the annexation proposal to ensure the concerns/issues of the Redhawk residents have been
addressed.
Mr. Sam Alhadeff, 27555 Ynez Road, #203. representing Excel Legacy Corporation and MDC
Vail, spoke in opposition to the annexation of Vail Ranch.
Mr. Ron Turco, 45436 Via Jaca (Redhawk resident), relayed his support of the request to annex
Vail Ranch, noting that such a decision should be determined by the Vail Ranch residents
without the input of the Redhawk residents.
R:\Minutes\032100
12
In light of the results of the November 1999 Election, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero, echoed by
Mayor Stone, relayed his support of proceeding with the annexation and forwarding it to
LAFCO.
Concurring with Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero's comment, Councilman Naggar offered the
following motion:
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 6, including the
adoption of Resolution No. 2000-20. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero
and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Pratt who abstained and
Councilman Roberts who was absent.
7 Review of City's Conflict of Interest Code
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE CITY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CODE
City Clerk Jones briefly reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), cladfying that the
position of Deputy Director of Public Works should be added to the Designated City of
Employees and Disclosure Categories.
MOTION: Councilman Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 7. The motion
was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Councilman Roberts who was absent.
At 11:40 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the
Temecuta Redevelopment Agency. At 11:52 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly
scheduled City Council business.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
18
Growth Manaclement Action Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
6.4 Approve the Growth Management Action Plan.
(Previously discussed; see pages 2-7.)
R:\Minutes\032100
13
19 Residential Buildin.a Permit Moratorium
RECOMMENDATION:
6.5 Determine whether to endorse or reject the idea of a Residential Building Permit
Moratorium.
(Previously discussed; see pages 2-7.)
20 Additional Amendments to the Citv's Regulation of Helium Balloons
RECOMMENDATION:
6.6 Direct staff to present this issue to the Planning Commission for a recommendation
to the Council on any needed Ordinance amendments.
Mayor Stone provided a brief overview of the matter.
Advising that Southern California Edison does not necessarily oppose the usage of balloons for
outdoor advertising, Mr. Bob Lopez, representing Southern California Edison, advised that
SCE's concern is the raising of the balloon height limit, which could lead to unfortunate power
outages and, therefore, requested that while the Planning Commission reviews the associated
ordinance, special consideration be given to the securing of these balloons.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
Commending the Public Works Department on a job well done, City Manager Nelson advised
that Rainbow Canyon Road will be open as of Fdday, March 24, 2000.
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson noted that there were no reportable actions from Closed Session under
the Brown Act.
ADJOURNMENT
At 11:56 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 28, 2000, at
7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
[SEAL]
R:\Minutes\032100
14
j~"eff'~reyE. Stone, Mayor