Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout060700 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 7, 2000 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:05 P.M., on Wednesday June 7, 2000, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Telesio. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners *Fahey, Mathewson, Telesio, Webster, and Chairman Guerriero. Absent: None. Also Present: Deputy City Manager Thornhill, Planning Manager Ubnoske, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, Chief Building Official Elmo, Attorney Curley, Associate Planner Donahoe, Associate Planner Thomas, Project Planner Thornsley, and Minute Clerk Hansen. *(Commissioner Fahey arrived at 6:07 P.M.) PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR It was noted that the Consent Calendar Items were considered separately. 1 Agenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of June 7, 2000. Chairman Guerriero relayed that Agenda Item No. 3 would be heard in conjunction with Agenda Item No. 10, and that Agenda Item No. 9 would be considered after Agenda Item No. 4. R:Pla n Comm~linutes\060700 1 MOTION: Chairman Guerriero moved to approve the agenda, as revised. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Fahey who was absent. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of March 15, 2000; 2.2 Approve the minutes ofApri119, 2000. It was noted that Commissioner Fahey arrived at 6:07 P.M. MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to approve Item No. 2.1. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to approve Item No. 2.2. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Fahey and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Fahey who abstained. COMMISSION BUSINESS 3 Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for Cox/West Properties at the Meadowview Golf Course located south of Nicolas Road, north of Del Rey Road, east of Margarita Road and west of Caile Medusa, within the Meadowview community. Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske/Associate Planner Carole Donahoe RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Review and make the appropriate finding. This Item was heard out of order in order to be considered in conjunction with Item No. 10; see page 13. For informational purposes, Chairman Guerriero relayed that the applicant for Agenda Item No. 10 had requested a continuance due to the need for additional time to prepare comments regarding the Negative Declaration; and advised that if the community desired to express their comments at tonight's meeting, while the matter would be continued, the Commission would hear public comments when Agenda Item No. 10 was considered. R:PlanCommffvlinutes\060700 2 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4 Planning Application No. PA99-0317 (Development Plan) - Temecu a R dge Apartments located on south side of Rancho California Road between Moraga and Humber. Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske/Associate Planner Carnie Donahoe RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Continue to July 5, 2000. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to continue this Item to July 5, 2000. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At this time the Commission considered Agenda Item No. 9. 9 Planning Application No. PA00-0039 (Development Plan) located at 42545 Rio Nedo west of Cai Empleado. Project Planner Thomas Thornsley RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0039, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 32,500 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING FOR INDUSTRIAL AND/OR WAREHOUSING USES, ON A 1.89 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 42545 RIO NEDO, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO'S 909-290-041 AND 042; 9.2 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA00-0039 (Development Plan). This project is exempt from further evaluation under CEQA Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects). Via overheads, Project Planner Thornsley provided an overview of the staff report (of record), highlighting the location, access, parking, landscaping, and architecture (inclusive of the recessed and glass articulation); for Commissioner Webster, noted that there was not a condition included in the Conditions of Approval that would require the applicant to submit a parking synopsis after a tenant was identified, relaying additional information regarding the existing parking provisions; and for Commissioner Telesio, provided additional information regarding the color of the sandblasting and the paint application. Mr. Vincent Dyer, architect representing the applicant, relayed that the color of the building would be similar to the City Hall building; and for Commissioner Webster, noted that the applicant would not be opposed to submitting a parking synopsis Prior to Occupancy. R:PlanComm'Wlin utes\060700 3 The Commission relayed closing remarks, as follows: Commissioner Telesio noted that if the color of the building would be similar to the City Hall building he had no additional concerns. Commissioner Webster recommended adding a condition requiring a parking synopsis Prior to Occupancy; and relayed that as buildings are developed further up the hill, it was his recommendation that the color palette be darker primarily to blend with the existing natural colors and to lessen the aesthetic impacts of large industrial buildings. Commissioner Mathewson noted that he was pleased with the architectural style; and relayed concurrence with Commissioner Webster's recommendation to require the applicant to file a parking synopsis when a tenant was identified. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public hearing; and to approve staffs recommendation with the additional condition that the applicant be required to submit a parking synopsis Prior to Occupancy. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At this time the Commission heard Agenda Item No. 5, proceeding with the regular order of the Agenda, noting that Agenda Item No. 3 would be considered in conjunction with Agenda Item No. 10. 5 Planning Application No. PA99-0124 (Conditional Use Permit & Development Plan)- Christ the Vine Lutheran Church located on the south side of North General Kearny Road approximately 320 feet east of the Margarita Road/North General Kearny Road intersection. Associate Planner Denice Thomas RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0124, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DESIGN, CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A '15,288 SQUARE FOOT LUTHERAN CHURCH ON 3.07 VACANT ACRES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 2 OF THE CAMPOS VERDES SPECIFIC PLAN GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD APPROXIMATELY 320 FEET EAST OF THE MARGARITA ROAD/NORTH GENERAL KEARNY ROAD INTERSECTION AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 92'1-009-075 Commissioner Fahey advised that she would be abstaining from this matter. Associate Planner Thomas provided an overview of the project (per agenda material); relayed the proposed building dimensions, and location; noted the architecture, relaying staff's concern regarding the size of the cross and the bell tower which contributed to the 52-foot building R:PlanComm'uMin utes\060700 4 height; and with respect to landscaping, relayed that the applicant has proposed a thirty-five and a half percent (38.5%) landscaping plan, which far exceeds the required fifteen percent (15%). With respect to the parking requirements, for Commissioner Mathewson, Associate Planner Thomas provided additional specification. For Commissioner Webster, with respect to CEQA issues, Associate Planner Thomas relayed that there would be inclusion of a condition that the applicant comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program; with respect to the height issue, noted that the cross had been treated as part of the architectural elements of the building; and confirmed that if the Commission approved the project, as proposed, there would need to be approval for a Minor Exception due to the height matter. Pastor Curtis Lyon, the applicant, for Commissioner Webster, relayed that although there were two alternate Lutheran churches in the area, there was a wide variety of differences among Lutherans; and noted that if it was the Commission's desire, the applicant would not be opposed reducing the size of the cross. Commissioner Telesio relayed that in his opinion the additional two feet in height on the cross was worthy of approval of a Minor Exception. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Lyon noted that the total number of members at this time was approximately 150, providing additional information regarding anticipated growth, relaying that it was customary to hold two services as attendance grew; and confirmed that there could potentially be a fellowship time in between two services at a future point in time, noting that the parking would be sufficient to accommodate the attendance. Mr. Knox Johnson, 29681 Avenida del Sol, queried why the applicant would not be required to pay for street improvements when alternate churches in alternate areas were being required to do so. Ms. Helen Hubka, 29830 Puesta del Sol, noted her concern with traffic impacting the Meadowview area; and queried whether there were traffic studies conducted with respect to this project. In response to Mr. Johnson's comments, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that North General Kearny in this area was improved to the Circulation Element standard, relaying that Community Southwest Development had installed those improvements at the time the property was sold to the School District; and clarified that this property was purchased by the church with the cost of those improvements included in the price of the property. The Commission relayed the following conclusions: Commissioner Mathewson, initially, relayed his concern with the inadequacy of the parking provisions. For Commissioner Mathewson, Planning Manager Ubnoske clarified that the entire 6,000 square feet would not be assembly space. Associate Planner Thomas noted that the area was inclusive of offices, classrooms, and alternate uses, relaying that the calculations were denoted in the staff report, and confirmed that the parking provisions exceed the required standards, noting that additional services would be staggered; advised that off-site parking would be R:PlanComm'uMin utes\060700 5 utilized if at a future point the service attendance outgrew the site; and noted that staff would further review the parking provisions when the applicant presented a proposal for Phase II of development. Having had his concerns regarding the parking provisions allayed, Commissioner Mathewson relayed his support of the project. Commissioner Webster advised that in his experience, if the service times were staggered that there would not be any negative parking or loading impacts. For Commissioner Webster, Associate Planner Thomas relayed that the property proximate to this site would be for development of an alternate church, relaying that since that particular applicant expressed a desire for shared access at a late point in time, it was the Public Works staff's opinion that the applicant for the Lutheran Church should not be required to re-design the site; and relayed that the proximate property would have solely one access point proximate to the park. In response to Ms. Hubka's comments, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that there were traffic studies conducted with respect to the entire Specific Plan, noting that this particular use meets those demands. In response to Commissioner Webster's queries regarding the queuing length of the driveway and the proximity to the parking spaces, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that the queuing had been reviewed by staff. With respect to the Minor Exception for the two-foot height variation, Commissioner Webster recommended that the request be granted. For Commissioner Telesio, with respect to Condition No. 14a (regarding public improvements), referencing page 18 of the Conditions of Approval, Deputy Director cf Public Works Parks relayed that there were no proposed streets improvements necessary other than those denoted, noting that the street width was adequate for this land use and for this specific area. In response to Commissioner Telesio, Associate Planner Thomas relayed that street parking was prohibited on North General Kearny Road. Commissioner Telesio relayed his support of the project, noting that the plan was well laid out with the surrounding area. Chairman Guerriero relayed his support of the project. MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to dose the public hearing; and to approve the project with the addition of a condition requiring compliance to the Mitigation Monitoring Program from the previous EIR, and granting a Minor Exception for the height variance. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Fahey who abstained. It was noted that at 6:56 P.M. the meeting recessed, reconvening at 7:10 P.M. R:PlanComm'Wlin utes\060700 6 6 Planning Application No. PA99-0510 (Development Plan) -AVOCA Enterprises, LLC located at 42486 Avenida Alvarado. Associate Planner Denice Thomas RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-05t0, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 23,7'10 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON '1.22 VACANT ACRES LOCATED AT 42486 AVENIDA ALVARADO AND KNOW AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-290-058; 6.2 Adopt a Notice of Exemption of Planning Application No. PA99-0510 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. Associate Planner Thomas presented the staff report (of record); relayed that staff recently received data from Chief Building Official Elmo regarding an area (a furred space) on the floor plan that was not calculated into the overall square footage of the building, noting that the applicant had relayed that there was no intent to occupy this area; relayed that since the additional space would increase the total square footage, there would be parking impacts and a need for a request for a greater FAR increase. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to continue this matter to the July 5, 2000 Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Fahey and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. (Ultimately this motion passed; see below.) Commissioner Webster requested the applicant to provide improved colored elevations at the continued hearing. Mr. Timothy Fuller, representing the applicant, relayed a desire to expedite the continuance, noting that the "furred space" was not intended for use. Chief Building Official EImo provided additional information regarding the "furred space, "noting that this area was brought to the applicant's attention during the Design Review process; clarified that the second floor construction plan, as proposed, exceeds the criteria that would classify this area as a mezzanine, per the Building Code. In light of the parking impacts associated with the additional space, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed concern. Mr. Fuller relayed that the applicant also owned four acres adjacent to this property, noting that at a future point in time there could be access to this adjacent site for parking. At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval. R: PlanComm~vlin utes\060700 7 7 Panning Application No. PA00-0125 (Development Plan) - Or.q nal Roadhouse Grill located on the east side of Ynez Road south of Winchester Road and north of the north mall entrance. Project Planner Thomas Thornsley RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0125 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN 8,134 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT (ORIGINAL ROADHOUSE GRILL), ON A 1.04 ACRE LOT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD AND NORTH OF THE NORTH ENTRANCE TO THE PROMENADE MALL SOUTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 9t0-320-036, AND LOT "M" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0495 AND PARCEL MERGER PA99-0007; 7.2 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA00-0125 (Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EiR) was previously certified pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations. Via colored renderings, Project Planner Thornsley presented the project proposal (via agenda material); and highlighted the proposed location, architecture (inclusive of enhanced articulation), parking provisions, landscaping, and signage. The applicant's representative was available for questions from the Commission. The Commission noted concluding remarks, as follows: Commission Telesio relayed that he supported the project, applauding the diversity of design in the context of the mall. Commissioner Webster relayed that the project design was fine; with respect to Condition Nos. 4, and 5 (regarding compliance with the Mitigation Measures contained in the Regional Center Specific Plan), advised that these conditions had not been satisfied by the original projects, or subsequent projects, clarifying that he would take a stand with respect to this project and future projects at the mall site, as well as at the Power Center site, noting that until those specific conditions were satisfied no further development should be approved within the Regional Center Specific Plan; advised that in light of the City Council taking a strong stand regarding traffic impacts, and since the traffic measures required for this area have not been satisfied, he strongly urged the Commission not to approve this project. For Chairman Guerriero, with respect to the Park and Ride facility, Attorney Curley noted that there were ambiguities in the language of the Specific Plan with respect to the timing and other issues as to the layout of the parking lot; advised that it would be difficult with certainty to link R:Pla nComm'Wlin utes\060700 8 this pamel to the Park and Ride facility; noted that if it was the Commission's desire, the underlying environmental document could be re-visited, and the issue could be brought before the Commission; and relayed that this was not the last project site until the mall was built out. Planning Manager Ubnoske requested additional time for staff to review the Specific Plan, acknowledging that while this issue had been continually raised, it was her understanding that staff and the attorney have reviewed the Specific Plan, noting that the verbiage was vague with respect to the reference to a Park and Ride facility; noted a desire to bring additional information to the Commission at a future meeting; relayed that it would not be her desire to hold up this project based on an issue that was related to the entire mall site; for Commissioner Webster, advised that if the language specified the requirement clearly then it would be accomplished and there would be a meeting with Forest City to resolve this issue; and reiterated that it was her understanding from staff discussions, that there was ambiguity in the Specific Plan. Commissioner Webster relayed that since these specific guidelines were developed by the City, if there was ambiguity, the City should be fully aware of the matter; noted that for months he had consistently brought this issue to the attention of staff; and advised that he was drawing the line on this project, as well as, for future projects in this area. Chairman Guerriero recommended bringing this matter (the Regional Center's Specific Plan Mitigation Measures) before the Commission at a future time, concurring with Commissioner Webster's concerns. For Commissioner Fahey, Planning Manager Ubnoske confirmed that there would be an opportunity to deal with the developer directly with respect to implementing the measures associated with the Specific Plan; and noted that there was also an need to determine whether the language specifically dictated these specific requirements (i.e., Park and Ride facility). MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public hearing; and to approve sta~s recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio. (Ultimately this motion passed; see below,) Commissioner Mathewson relayed that he shared Commissioner Webster's concerns regarding addressing the issues of discussion, clarifying that it would be his desire for staff to address this matter prior to bringing forward further development proposals related to this Specific Plan. At this time voice vote was taken reflecting approval with the exception of Commissioner Webster who voted no. Planning Application No. PA98-0309 (Development Plan) - Temecula Creek Inn Expansion located at 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road. Project Planner Thomas Thornsley RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:Pla nComm'~lin utes\060700 9 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0309 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A HOTEL ROOM ADDITION AND A MINOR EXCEPTION TO THE PARKING STANDARDS, ON A PORTION OF THE TEMECULA CREEK INN SITE LOCATED AT 44501 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 922-220-003, 004, 007, & 008; 8.2 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA98-0309 (Development Plan). This project is exempt from further evaluation under CEQA Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects). Project Planner Thornsley presented the staff report (per agenda material); relayed the proposed plan to add 48 additional hotel rooms and a new meeting room; relayed a brief history of the project; highlighted the access provisions, and the site design; noted that the design of the proposed addition would be consistent with the existing buildings, while relaying that the new hotel suite would be three stories; provided an overview of the architectural elements, building materials, and enhanced articulation; with respect to parking provisions, noted the applicant's' request for a Minor Exception for a ten percent (10%) parking reduction, providing additional information regarding the mixed uses; with respect to the landscape plan, noted the applicant's efforts to preserve numerous mature trees on site; with respect to Condition No. 7, (regarding the guest room roofs) noted that the material should be modified to reflect concrete tiles; with respect to Condition No. 33 (regarding street improvements), relayed that the revised condition should be worded, as follows: The Developer shall provide on Rainbow Canyon Road a southbound 150-foot right-turn lane and a northbound 150-foot left turn at the Goff Club entrance. The improvements shall consist of asphalt paving, striping, and signage designed to meet Public Works standards; noted that the referenced letter from East Municipal Water District in the staff report was inadvertently left out of the agenda packets, and provided per supplemental material, relaying a summary of the information included in the letter; and provided additional information regarding the project being exempt from further evaluation under CEQA, noting that the actual area of the site altered for the proposed project would be approximately 1.5-1.75 acres. For Commissioner Mathewson, Project Planner Thornsley provided additional information regarding the calculations related to the parking ratios, and the mixed uses of this particular facility. In response to Commissioner Mathewson's concerns regarding adequate parking provisions, Commissioner Telesio noted that there existed a five percent (5%) leeway in the request for a Minor Exception reduction since the request was for a ten percent (10%) reduction, and the Development Code allows for a fifteen (15%) reduction. In response, Project Planner Thornsley relayed that if the meeting room was calculated into the ratios, the request for a Minor Exception would not be adequate. For informational purposes, Project Planner Thornsley clarified that additional parking provisions would encroach upon the area where the existing live Oak trees were located. R:PlanCommWlinutes\060700 10 Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant, thanked staff and Project Planner Thornsley for their diligent efforts with respect to this project; relayed concurrence with the modification to Condition No. 7 (regarding the concrete tile roofing material); with respect to Conditions Nos. 32, and 33, noted the applicant's' submission of a letter to staff addressing these issues; for Commissioner Mathewson, relayed that there would be no restrictions with respect to the public's use of the meeting room, noting that typically the meeting room would be utilized by hotel guests; provided additional information regarding the fluctuation of the utilization of the uses; relayed that the parking provisions were maximized without impacting the mature landscaped areas or the tennis courts; noted that additional parking could be added at the extreme east or south end of the complex, but would not be easily accessible to the meeting room area; relayed that for special events, accommodations would be provided to handle these rare occasions, noting that most of the events were not held at this facility due to inadequate large meeting areas; and clarified that this proposal would eliminate the temporary structures Iocated on this property. In light of the concerns regarding adequate parking, Commissioner Webster's recommended the addition of a condition requiring valet parking for special events. In response, Mr. Markham relayed that the applicant would be agreeable to the additional condition. The Commission relayed concluding remarks, as follows: Commissioner Fahey relayed that based on her experience in visiting this site that the parking provisions were adequate; expressed concurrence with the added condition, requiring valet parking for special events; and noted her support of the project. Commissioner Mathewson relayed concern with respect to the parking calculations, specifically, as it relates to policy standards; noted that the meeting room would most likely be utilized on weekends by local residents; relayed that he would support the request for a Minor Exception for a reduction in parking provisions, requesting Attorney Curley to address whether an alternate applicant for an alternate proposed use could oppose required parking provisions due to this project's proposal. Attorney Curley advised that a project-by-project analysis would not set a precedent for demands by alternate applicants for the same Conditions of Approval; acknowledged that there did need to be clarification with respect to this matter, inclusive of manners to address these issues (i.e., a parking management plan); and relayed that the recommended additional condition requiring valet parking would accomplish this goal. Chairman Guerriero relayed his support of the project. With respect to the revised wording of Conditions No. 33 (regarding street provisions), for Commissioner Telesio, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that staff would investigate safety lighting at the intersection. Commissioner Telesio noted that any negative parking impacts would only affect the applicant due to the distance between alternate uses; and relayed his support of the project; Mr. Markham relayed that the applicant would be agreeable to provisions for safety lighting, and to either a valet parking requirement or a parking management plan for special events. R:PlanCornm'~in utes\060700 11 MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public hearing; and to approve staff's recommendation with the following added conditions: Add- , A condition requiring a parking management plan (to include but not be limited to valet parking) to be submitted to address peak use. · A condition to address safety lighting at the intersection. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. It was noted that at 8:28 P.M. the meeting recessed, reconvening at 8:35 P.M. 9 Planninq Application No. PA00-0039 (Development Plan) located at 42545 Rio Nedo west of Cai Empleado. Project Planner Thomas Thornsle¥ RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0039, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 32,500 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING FOR INDUSTRIAL AND/OR WAREHOUSING USES, ON A 1.89 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 42545 RIO NEDO, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO'S 909-290-041 AND 042; 9.2 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA00-0039 (Development Plan). This project is exempt from further evaluation under CEQA Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects). This Agenda Item was heard out of order; see page 3. 10 Plannin.q Application No. PA99-0292 (Conditional Use Permit) - Meadowview Golf Course west of Calle Medusa, within the Meadowview community. Associate Planner Carole Donahoe RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA99-0292 (Conditional Use Permit); 10.2 Adopt the Mitigated Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA99-0292 (Conditional Use Permit); 10.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:Pla nComm'~linutes\060700 12 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0292 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR'THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF AN 18-HOLE PUBLIC GOLF COURSE WITH A 7.097 SQUARE FOOT CLUBHOUSE, A CART BARN MAINTENANCE AND OTHER ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, DRIVING RANGE AND AN EQUESTRIAN TRAIL PARK AND PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0292 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERMIT THE OPERATION OF THE MEADOWVIEW GOLF COURSE ON 297 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF NICOLAS ROAD, NORTH OF DEL REY ROAD, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND WEST OF CALLE MEDUSA, WITHIN THE MEADOWVIEW COMMUNITY, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO'S. 919-340-023 AND 92'1-090-04'1 It was noted that Agenda Item No. 10 was heard in conjunction with Agenda Item No. 3. 3 Findinq of Public Convenience or Necessity for Cox/West Propedies at the Meadowview Golf Course located south of Nicolas Road, north of Del Rey Road, east of Margarita Road and west of Calle Medusa, within the Meadowview community. Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske/Associate Planner Carole Donahoe RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Review and make the appropriate finding. Commissioner Fahey advised that she would be abstaining with regard to this issue. For the record, Commissioner Webster advised that through his employment with Rancho California Water District (RCWD) he had worked with the applicant's developer to Quick Claim an easement that RCWD had within this property, requesting confirmation from the attorney that there was no conflict of interest issue. Attorney Curley advised that there was no conflict of interest issue with past events; and for Commissioner Telesio, clarified that the fact that he would be an heir to property in the Meadowview area would not be a conflict of interest matter. Associate Planner Associate Planner Donahoe provided a brief overview of the proposed project (of record), specifying the supplemental agenda material which was inclusive of the responses of the community with respect to this project, the letter from the Meadowview Community Association Board of Directors, and the response letter from Deputy City Manager ThornhiII; advised that staff had received a letter at 3:15 P.M. today from the Department of Fish&Game, noting that although the issues could most likely be addressed, that due to the late hour of receipt of the data, there was no opportunity to address the issues; and relayed that the applicant had requested a continuance in order to address the issues in the environmental data. At this time Chairman Guerriero opened the public hearing. R: PlanComm~Min utes\060700 13 The following individuals were opposed to the golf course project, as proposed: Ms. Maria Hetzner Ms. Suzanne Ellis Mr. Robert Kaufman Mr. Richard Thompson Ms. Marlene Vanik Ms. Patricia Witt Ms. Janet Combs George Buhler Ms. Patrice Lynes Mr. Ed L. Thompson Mr. James Stoops Ms Dawn Schmid Ms Sandy Gesswein Ms. JoEllen Byrnes Ms. Joan Stoops Mr. Vance Tschanz 40657 Carmelita 41850 Calle Cerezo 30455 Del. Rey Road 29657 Via Node 30351 San Pasqual Road 40702 La Colima 29991 Via Norte 40265 Paseo Sereno 30700 San Pasqual Road 40325 Paseo Sereno 30195 Via Norte 30021 Los Nogales Road 40840 Via los Altos 30035 Via Node 30195 Via Node 30797 San Pasqual Road The above-mentioned individuals were opposed to the project for the following reasons: Noted the opposition to the serving of alcohol in close proximity to a school, specifically due to the potential negative impact on children's safety since the streets in this area are narrow with no sidewalks or streetlights. · Relayed concern with respect to the environmental impacts associated with this project. · Recommended that Mayor Stone's six issues expressed last week be addressed prior to approval of this project. · Noted the dramatic negative impact on a specific residence, with respect to the placement of the clubhouse parking lot and the cad barn. · Relayed concern with the additional generation of traffic, and access issues. · Opposed to the proposed scarcity of planned trees or shrubs. · Noted that devaluation of any resident was in direct opposition to the CC&R's. · Queried the development of the project after the original vote of the Members of the Association was had been a no vote. · Referenced the environmental data in the staff report, noting the potential negative impact effects, and challenged the results. · Recommended that a full Environmental Impact Report be conducted and submitted to the Planning Commission for review. · Challenged the Association's voting process, noting the taking of a second vote with respect to this issue. R:Pla nComrn'W1inutes\060700 14 · Relayed concern with liability issues with respect to potential injuries on the trails. · Expressed concern regarding the generation of noise, and light, which contributed to the lack of a peaceful setting. · Referenced the Meadowview tract advertising material, noting the assurance of open space areas. · Relayed a preference for the existing large pristine open space area. In response to Ms. Hetzner's queries, Attorney Curley relayed that it would be most effective to finish collecting signatures for the petition of those opposed to the serving of alcohol at this use, and to submit one final completed petition at the time of the continued hearing. For Ms. Ellis, Associate Planner Donahoe specified the property that encompassed the golf course project, relayed that she would provide additional information after investigation. For Ms. Kaufman, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the Environmental Study would be available in copy form for residents who came to the Planning Department and requested the data. The following individuals were proponents of the proposed to the golf course project, as proposed: Mr. John Hoagland Mr. Arthur OImore Ms. Pat Birdsall Ms. Cheryl Beal Mr. Bob Lopshire Mr. Rayne Fairchild Ms. Nancy S. Checkitts 40481 Calle Fiesta 31121 Avenue Buena Suerte 41540 Avenida Barca 30010 Del Rey 40244 Atmore Court 29690 Avenida Del Sol 30780 Del Rey Road The above-mentioned individuals were proponents of the project for the following reasons: · Noted the historic negotiations and plans to develop a future golf course. · Relayed that it was within the rvleadowview Community Association's land-use rights to develop the golf course project. · Noted that in 1971 the CC&R's referenced the golf course project. With respect to the serving of alcohol, advised that from a Law Enforcement standpoint, golf courses did not provide a negative impact, providing information regarding neighboring golf courses. · Noted that the property currently was dirt and not a preferable choice over the development of a golf course. · Advised that the project would be an asset to the community. R: Pla n Comm'A/lin utes\060?00 15 · Relayed that if the golf course were extremely challenging, the amount of alcohol consumed would be reduced. Recommended adding an additional entry access into the Meadowview area via North General Kearny Road, and that the City revisit the issue of opening Sanderling Way in order to improve circulation. · Noted that the golf course would provide a beautiful open space area. · Relayed that with the golf course there would still be wildlife on site, and that the development would reduce the fire hazards. Opposed the manner in which opposing data was distributed without the identification of names, or with postage (i.e., illegally placed in mailboxes), submitting copies of the distributed material for the record. Mr. Louie Vega, 30065 Del Rey, noted that he was neither for, nor against the project, noting his concern with respect to the Association's voting process. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to close the public hearing; and to continue this matter off calendar. Commissioner Webster seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Fahey who abstained. COMMISSIONER REPORTS Commissioner Mathewson queried staff for input regarding the Commission's Code of Conduct relating to ex parte communications. In response, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that this was acceptable practice and even encouraged, noting that if the issue was a matter of concern with the full Commission, that perhaps the issue should be brought forward to the City Council for input. Chairman Guerriero provided information received from numerous workshops (including the APA), noting that there was no conflict as long as the meetings were noted on the record. Attorney Curley relayed that a Commission had the jurisdiction to self-regulate, noting the tradition to allow contact as long as it was disclosed; and advised that if the Commission had a desire to evaluate a structure which would preclude or limit the external contact, staff could provide additional information. Commissioner Mathewson clarified that his concern was with respect to the consistency of information presented to the Commissioners individually, relaying that a Code of Conduct developed could resolve these issues; and urged the Commission to consider pursuing this matter. Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that when there was a full Commission again, the issue could be readdressed in order to gain additional input; and relayed that the matter would be agendized for a future meeting. R:PlanComm'~linutes\060700 16 Commissioner Webster relayed a desire to review the Water Conservation Ordinance in the Development Code, acknowledging that staff was currently overloaded from a work schedule standpoint, noting that he could provide proposed revisions to staff for their review. With respect to the Growth Management Policy recently adopted by the City Council, Commissioner Webster relayed his disappointment that the Planning Commission was not provided the opportunity to provide input with respect to the formation of the policy; noted that the new policy appeared to be in conflict with the Growth Management Element in the General Plan; and queried whether there was going to be a revised General Plan. In response, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that the General Plan was going to be updated in the near future. Commissioner Telesio relayed his discomfort with ex parte meetings, concurring with Commissioner Mathewson's comments; and relayed that he would not oppose restrictions with respect to this matter, noting that until there was resolve of this issue he would not participate in ex-parte communications. Chairman Guerriero relayed that since the General Plan would be updated at a future time, it was his opinion that the issue of cumulative impacts should be addressed at that time. With respect to provision of material and color boards for proposed projects, Chairman Guerriero requested that this material be provided for the Commission for each project. Chairman Guerriero relayed his discomfort with staff providing important data as supplemental agenda material at the time of the meeting, noting that the Commission has no opportunity to review the material. In response, Planning Manager Ubnoske noted that at times data was provided to staff by the applicant after the agenda packets had gone out, querying the Commission's desire with respect to this issue. Chairman Guerriero relayed that in his opinion, if an applicant did not provide ample review time for the Commission, then the project should be continued; and with respect to staff's data being provided at the time of the hearing, recommended that all material be provided to the Commission so that it could be reviewed prior to the meeting, specifically referencing the letter from the Water District submitted at tonight's meeting which was lengthy and not provided until the hearing. With respect to the lack of landscaping around the Promenade Homes tract, Chairman Guerriero recommended that staff address this issue. PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that the newly hired senior planner would be introduced at the next Planning Commission meeting. R:PlanComm~Minutes~060700 17 ADJOURNMENT At 9:53 P.M. Chairman Guerdero formally adjourned this meeting to Wednesday, June 21, 2000 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Ron G u e rrie ~',','~h ~i r-m~ n Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Mana~'er R:PlanComm\Minutes\060700 18