HomeMy WebLinkAbout111500 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 15, 2000
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:03 P.M.,
on Wednesday November 15, 2000, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Telesio.
ROLLCALL
Present:
Commissioners Chiniaeff, Telesio, Webster, and Chairman
Guerriero.
Absent:
Commissioner Mathewson.
Also Present:
Director of Planning Ubnoske,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Development Services Administrator McCarthy,
Attorney Curley,
Senior Planner Hogan,
Associate Planner Donahoe,
Associate Planner Thornsley,
Project Planner Rush, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1
Agenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of November 15, 2000.
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of September 6, 2000.
2.2 Approve the minutes of September 20, 2000.
Plannin¢] Application No. 00-0331 (Extension of Time) for Planninq Application No.
98-0083 (Development Plan) to construct a 16,760 square foot office/warehouse on
1.1 acres, located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Zevo Drive and
Winchester Road - Rick Rush, Proiect Planner
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-3.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who was absent and Commissioner
Chiniaeff who abstained with regard to Agenda Item No. 3 on the September 6, 2000
minutes and Agenda Item No. 8 on the September 20, 2000 minutes.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
4 Update on Wolf Creek Subcommittee
Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the project was on schedule, noting that the
Wolf Creek Project would be presented before the Commission at the December 6, 2000
Planning Commission meeting.
For Commissioner Webster, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that Councilman Pratt
and Councilman Naggar were on the Wolf Creek Subcommittee.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
5
Planninq Application No. 00-0335 (Development Plan - Fast Track) to desiqn,
construct and operate a 410,000 square foot industrial buildinq on approximately 33
acres for the purposes of manufacturinfl, distributinq and warehousinq durable
floods, located at the southeast corner of the extension of Dendy Parkway and the
extension of Winchester Road, and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 909-370-001, -
022, -025, -026, and -027 - Carole Donahoe, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. 00-0335
(Development Plan - Fast Track);
5.2 Adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. 00-0335
(Development Plan - Fast Track);
5.3 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
2 R:Pla nComm./m~n ut es/111500
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-034
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0335 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN -
FAST TRACK), THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND
OPERATION OF A 410,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING
ON APPROXIMATELY 33 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EXTENSION OF
DENDY PARKWAY AND THE EXTENSION OF
WINCHESTER ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NOS. 909-370-001,022, 025, 026, AND 027
Via overheads, Associate Planner Donahoe presented the staff report (of record), noting
that the project was granted Fast-Track status due to the amount of employment that it
will provide to the community; highlighted the specific location, the zoning (Light
Industrial), the site design, the delivery areas, and the circulation; relayed staff's original
concern with the large building, noting that the applicant's design plan alleviated the
majority of these concerns, highlighting the architectural features to divide and reduce
the scale of the building and offer visual interest, providing additional detail regarding the
architectural and landscaping enhancements; and noted that with respect to
landscaping, the setbacks along the streets are varied, enabling clustering, relaying that
the landscape plan provided meaningful space, thereby enhancing the image of the
Scotts Manufacturing Company building.
Associate Planner Donahoe relayed that the applicant has requested that there be a
reconsideration of the parking requirements for the project, proposing that parking be
determined by the number of employees in its shifts as opposed to the formula utilized
in the Development Code, noting that the largest shift would encompass 185 employees,
advising that the applicant has doubled that amount, and was offering 370 employee
spaces, along with visitor, vendor and delivery service space which equated to a total of
395 spaces; relayed that per the applicant's experience at alternate facilities of the
company, that approximately 30 people per shift carpool or vanpool; noted that there
were, additionally, bicycle and motorcycle spaces located in the front of the building;
advised that staff's opinion was that the request for a reconsideration of the parking
requirements was reasonable based on the company's past experience, noting that the
project was conditioned in the case that the parking provisions were inadequate,
relaying that the applicant would be required to provide additional parking, if deemed
necessary; and relayed that if there was a status of operations increase, there would
also be an opportunity to review and reassess the parking analysis, noting that the site
design offered the availability to add additional parking, relaying that staff could revisit
this matter, if deemed necessary, advising that Condition Nos. 6, and 7 address this
concern.
Associate Planner Donahoe provided additional information regarding the traffic
analysis, noting the condition for the applicant to install a signal at DiazNVinchester
Roads, relaying that the applicant would be reimbursed with City funds due to the
impacts addressed being present without the addition of this project; advised that per the
memorandum before the Commission, there was a request for two additional Conditions
of Approval (Condition Nos. 93 and 94) regarding Hazardous Materials, based on the
3 R:Pla nComm/mirlut es/111500
Fire Department's recommendation, providing additional information; with respect to the
second item on the memorandum, relayed that this denoted a request by the City
Attorney to add language to Section 3 of the PC Resolution associated with this project,
noting that this language was regarding compliance to CEQA requirements; and
apprised the Commission of the packet of data provided (per supplemental agenda
material) from the applicant, regarding the company and its outreach, and community
service programs.
With respect to Commissioner Chiniaeff's queries regarding Condition Nos. 94, 95, and
97, (regarding alcohol sales) Associate Planner Donahoe confirmed that these
conditions should be stricken; advised that the applicant has reviewed the additional
conditions and the revision to Section 3 of the PC Resolution, noting that the applicant
was in concurrence with these modifications (denoted in the supplemental agenda
material); and provided additional information regarding areas that could be redesigned
for provision of additional parking, if deemed necessary, at a future point in time.
For Commissioner Webster, Associate Planner Donahoe relayed that with this project
the intersection at Winchester Road/Jefferson Avenue the Level of Service (LOS) would
not change, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks noting that the LOS was at Level D.
In response to Commissioner Webster's queries regarding Condition No. 41c., Deputy
Director of Public Works Parks relayed that this project was conditioned to complete the
gap in the pavement between the Milgard property and this project, noting that there
would be a reimbursement agreement through Milgard for that use to fund the
improvement; confirmed that this project was conditioned to install the half-street
improvements on Dendy Parkway, providing additional information; and noted that if at a
future point there were negative impacts with respect to trucks accessing the site, the
Public Works Department would ensure that there was a safe turning motion.
For Commissioner Webster, Associate Planner Donahoe confirmed that most of the area
has been rough-graded, relaying that Condition No. 14 provided assurance that should
anything be found on site it would need to be addressed.
Chairman Guerriero expressed gratitude to Associate Planner Donahoe and the Fire
Department for addressing his previous concern with respect to the hazardous materials.
Mr. John Bragg, Jr., representing the applicant, provided information regarding the
Kearny Real Estate Company, relaying the rationale for developing in the City of
Temecula; advised that the Scotts Company was the "Number One" name in the world in
lawn care products; and introduced the multiple representatives available for questions
from the Commission.
In response to Commissioner Webster's queries regarding the parking provisions,
Associate Planner Donahoe reiterated the employee count of 185 at the largest shift.
Mr. Bragg provided additional information regarding the parking needs and provisions.
Commissioner Webster clarified that it was his concern that the handicapped parking not
be utilized for regular employee parking.
For Commissioner Telesio, Mr. Bragg relayed that the overlap in time schedules with the
shift changes would be approximately 15-20 minutes.
4 R:PtanComm/m~nutes/111500
In response to Commissioner Telesio, the applicant's representative relayed that while
there would be a base of employees relocated to work at this site, that additional
employees would also be hired.
For informational purposes, Associate Planner Donahoe relayed that the second shift
would encompass 165 employees, and the last shift would encompass 145 employees.
Chairman Guerriero opened the public comment period at this time.
Mr. Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, relayed his concern regarding the project,
noting that either the employees for this use would be commuting every day to the City
of Temecula, or there would be an increase in the need for subsidized or Iow-income
housing, relaying that this use wourd attract Iow-skilled workers; and noted that this
project would generate negative impacts with respect to traffic, air pollution, and future
economic development.
For Mr. Bruckman, Commissioner Webster clarified the Commission's charge to review
the project in terms of the City's General Plan, the Development Code, and the EIR. In
response, Mr. Bruckman clarified that his concern was primarily related ~o the type of
jobs being created with this type of manufacturing facility.
The Commission relayed concludinq comments, as follows:
Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that he concurred with Commissioner Webster's
comments regarding the parking provisions, while noting that the site had land and area
available which could be utilized at a future point for additional parking, and that the
project was conditioned so that if the parking was deemed inadequate, the applicant
would be required to provide further analysis and additional parking provisions; with
respect to Mr. Bruckman's comments, relayed that he disagreed with the comments
expressed, noting that in his opinion this use would be a welcome addition to the
community, providing a good sales tax base; and advised that he would support the
project with the conditions sefforth.
Commissioner Telesio relayed that development was market-driven, concurring with
Commissioner Chiniaeff that the City was not considering an elitist type complexion for
this community; and advised that in his opinion the project was well designed and would
be an adequate and welcome addition to the community.
Commissioner Webster relayed that since street parking was prohibited in this area,
his comments regarding the parking provisions were not of great concern; with respect
to Mr. Bruckman's comments, noted that traffic and air pollution impacts were
adequately addressed within the CEQA document and within the Conditions of Approval;
with respect to housing needs and the type of work this project would attract, relayed
that within the General Plan, and the General Plan EIR there was a goal to provide a
jobs/housing balance in order to reduce traffic and air pollution impacts, advising that
this project would provide a benefit to the City with respect to the job/housing ratios,
noting that there was a lack of multi-family and affordable housing within the City,
advising that there appeared to be a growing economic prejudice against these housing
options; and advised that the conditions and resolutions (as modified) were adequate for
this project, recommending approval of the project.
5 R:Pla nCornm/m~n ules/111500
For Chairman Guerriero, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the project
was conditioned to install the signal at Diaz/Winchester Roads Prior to Occupancy,
providing additional information.
MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public hearing; to approve the
project with the following modifications:
Modify-
· That the conditions, and Section 3 of the PC Resolution be modified, as
presented in the memorandum from staff (per supplemental agenda material)
That Condition Nos. 94, 95, and 97(regarding the sale of alcohol) be deleted.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who was absent.
6
Planninq Application No. 00-0260 (Development Plan) to desiqn, construct and
operate a 6,150 square foot Outback Steakhouse Restaurant located on
approximately 1.28 vacant acres within the Community Commercial (CC) Zone -
Denice Thomas, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA00-0260 pursuant
to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines;
6.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-035
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0260, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION
OF A 6,150 SQUARE FOOT OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE
RESTAURANT ON APPROXIMATELY 1.29 VACANT
ACRES LOCATED AT 40275 WINCHESTER ROAD
WITHIN THE WINCHESTER MEADOWS SHOPPING
CENTER AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.
911-770-010;
Via overheads, Senior Planner Hogan provided an overview of the project plan (via
agenda material), noting the location, access points, site plan, landscaping, and parking
provisions (which exceed the Code requirements); requested input from the Commission
regarding the architecture and colors proposed, specifically whether this use's proposed
architecture and colors should be similar to the uses in the Center or whether it would be
more appropriate to create a unique appearance; presented the elevation design plan,
noting the enhanced articulation, relaying that the roof design and the standing metal
seam were the most noticeable variations with respect to consistency with the Center's
6 R:PlanComm/mJnutes/111500
existing design elements; provided a color material board for this project for the
Commission's review, additionally presenting the color samples approved for the Center;
and noted the modified PC Resolution (per supplemental agenda material).
For Commissioner Webster, Mr. Bill Fancher, the applicant, provided additional
information regarding the proposed architecture, noting that at an Irvine site where the
standard metal-seamed roof and the neon was not installed, that this location had a
considerable lower revenue than alternate sites; advised that the proposed design for
this particular project represented a compromise between the desires of the Corporate
office and staff; and relayed the rationale for placing the front door of the restaurant on
Winchester Road, noting that the rear of the store served operations that were more
appropriate for the location at the back of the building.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's comments, Mr. Fancher relayed that this
particular project was a franchised operation, noting that the entire state of California
encompassed the franchising (which entailed approximately 51 stores); and provided
additional information regarding the slight variations of design at the various locations,
noting that at this particular site pop-outs were added, and in the area where there was
an expanse of wall that trelliswork and vines were added.
Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that while he did not oppose a standing seamed roof that
this element did not appear to fit in with the design standards of this Center. In response,
Mr. Fancher relayed that there were alternate uses in the Center with standing metal-
seamed roofs and alternate sites with the same color palette, advising that the standing
metal-seamed roof was a logotype element for the Outback Steakhouse Restaurant.
Chairman Guerriero relayed that he appreciated the uniqueness in the design elements
at the Center, which created a diverse, more interesting appearance.
For Chairman Guerriero, Mr. Fancher relayed that the applicant was flexible with respect
to landscaping, noting that the trellis vine was proposed to be bougan villa.
Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that this particular planting does not grow well in this
area.
Chairman Guerriero relayed that his concerns would be alleviated if the applicant would
agree to work with staff with respect to the landscaping at the rear of the building. In
response, the applicant relayed agreement.
With respect to Condition No. 42 (regarding the developer recording a lot line
adjustment), Mr. Fancher relayed that there was no lot line adjustment proposed at this
time, acknowledging that the Center owner planned a realignment at a future date,
querying whether this condition would encumber the applicant with respect to obtaining a
building permit or occupancy. In response, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks
relayed that a building permit would not be approved with a lot line going through the
building, noting that he was unsure where the existing lot lines were located.
Ms. Nina Raey, representing the applicant, specified the existing parcel lines, noting that
per discussions with engineering staff, it was agreed that as long as the parcel line did
not run across the proposed building, the project would be permitted to move forward, as
proposed; and relayed that the property owner did not have data at this time regarding
R:P~a nComm/rr~ n ut es/111500
the future alternate uses. In response, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised
that the building permit would not be held up in this situation.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Ms. Raey confirmed that there were reciprocal parking
easements between the parcels on the property.
Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that as a safeguard it would be her
recommendation to leave Condition No. 42 in the Conditions of Approval and to add
language stating if deemed necessary by the Planning Department.
The Commission relayed cIosinq remarks, as follows:
Commissioner Telesio echoed Chairman Guerriero's comments regarding the positive
appearance with the diversity of design elements at the Center; and relayed that this
project would be a great addition to the City of Temecula.
Commissioner Webster noted that he was not opposed to the design elements, which
created a unique appearance.
Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that it was his recommendation that the applicant
work with staff regarding the landscaping palette, recommending deleting the proposed
oak trees (due to the slow growth of this particular species) with an alternate tree, or in
response to Senior Planner Hogan, relayed that the applicant could plant a larger size
oak tree if this particular species was desired to be maintained in the landscape plan;
and recommended replacing the vines with an alternate vine planting (i.e., deleting the
bougan villa).
Chairman Guerriero echoed Commissioner Chiniaeff's comments, recommending,
additionally, that the applicant work with staff to enhance the rear landscaping.
In response to Director of Planning Ubnoske's queries, the Commission voiced no
opposition to the proposed neon at this site.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to close the public hearing; and to approve
staff's recommendation, with the following modifications:
Add-
With respect to Condition No. 42 (regarding the developer recording a lot
line adjustment) that the phrase if deemed necessary by the Planning
Department be added.
That the applicant work with staff regarding the landscaping palette.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who was absent.
It was noted that at 7:14 P.M. the meeting recessed, reconvening at 7:20 P.M.
8 R:PlanComm/rnnutes/111500
7
Planninq Application No. 00-0301 (Development Plan - Johnny Carino's) to
construct a single story 6, 740 square foot full serVice restaurant with a 980 square
foot patio, located on the south side of Winchester Road, east of Ynez Road, on
Outlot '!l" alon.q the rinq road of the Promenade Mall - Thomas Thornsley, Associate
Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 00-0301
(Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project
for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations;
7.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-036
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 00-0301 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 7,923
SQUARE FOOT FULL SERVICE RESTAURANT
(JOHNNY CARINO'S), ON A 1.23 ACRES LOT
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER
ROAD, EAST OF YNEZ ROAD, ALONG THE RING
ROAD OF THE PROMENADE MALL, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-320-032, AND LOT "1"
OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0495.
By way of overheads, Associate Planner Thornsley presented the project plan (of
record), relaying the location of the site, the access points, and the site plan; noted that
the overall site was 1.23 acres, that the building was 7,923 square feet which comprised
6,410 square feet for the restaurant with a 984 square-foot enclosed patio area, and a
530 square-foot service area; advised that the parking analysis for the site was based on
the Outlot Parcel Design Guidelines for the Regional Specific Plan which requires ten
spaces per 1,000 square feet of dining area which would equate to a requirement to
provide 35 parking spaces, noting the applicant's proposal for 58 parking spaces;
advised that staff's opinion was that the architecture style proposed provided visual
interest, noting the Italian countryside theme, relaying that there would be the
appearance of a two-story element at the entrance, noting the stonework at the entry,
and on the tower feature (as denoted in the agenda material); specified the location of
the outdoor patio area; relayed that there was a Spanish tile roof proposed for this area,
and a green toned concrete slate style roof for the building; noted the color variations on
the building; provided additional information regarding the proposed signage, noting that
the applicant has been conditioned to scale down the size of the signage painted on the
building to a letter height that does not exceed three feet; with respect to landscaping,
relayed that twenty-two percent (22%) of the site was landscaped, noting that after
additional review the project had been conditioned to modify this plan in order to
enhance the streetscape scene along the ring road; and in response to Chairman
Guerriero, presented the color and material board.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's comments regarding the ivy species proposed
at this site, Associate Planner Thornsley relayed that staff would work with the applicant,
and that this planting would be replaced with an alternate planting.
For Commissioner Webster, Associate Planner Thornsley confirmed that all of the
parcels located on Winchester Road were now completed; and confirmed that this parcel
and the one to the east of it were the sole lots proximate to Winchester Road that had
not been developed.
Mr. Brian Price, the applicant, relayed an overview of the history of the company which
presently operated approximately 48 restaurants, providing a background of the Johnny
Carino's Restaurants which were primarily located in the state of Texas.
In response to Commissioner Webster's queries regarding Condition No. 5 (regarding
compliance with all the mitigation measures for the Temecuia Regional Center Specific
Plan), Mr. Price reiterated that this company has developed the On the Border
Restaurant_and the Burger King site at the mall location, noting that the applicant was
familiar with the conditions placed on the mall property, as a whole.
Commissioner Chiniaeff, echoed by Chairman Guerriero, commended Mr. Price for the
great architectural design.
The Commission relayed closinq comments, as follows:
Commissioner Telesio relayed that an additional Italian restaurant would be a
favorable addition to the City; and noted appreciation for the antiquated-styled
architecture treatment.
Commissioner Webster provided comments regarding the Specific Plan and the CEQA
Document for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, reiterating that there was a
specific requirement for the provision of a park and ride facility, and provision for land for.
a future transit facility, noting the intent to mitigate the traffic impacts with these two
elements provided on site as a conjunctive use facility; noted that the County has begun
to investigate potential transit options along Highway 79 South as part of the Integrated
Plan, relaying that it would be a benefit to have the legal requirements of this particular
whole project site fulfilled, reiterating that at this point all the parcels fronting Winchester
Road were occupied, noting that this parcel along with the adjacent parcel were the sole
parcels left proximate to Winchester Road; queried when the Planning Commission, the
City Council, and the staff intend to comply with the legal requirements regarding the
mall site, and to require that these certain mitigation measures are upheld; relayed that
in his opinion there was a disservice to the citizens of the City of Temecula, not only
from a legal standpoint, but in response to addressing the traffic impacts in not enforcing
the requirement for these elements to be implemented; with respect to staff's previous
comments, stating that these elements would be addressed during the second mall
expansion, relayed that by that time all of these parcels would be full, advising that the
sole manner of addressing the issue at that point in time would be to remove existing
buildings, noting that the sole area where a park and ride and a transit facility could
adequately function was next to the transportation corridor on the state highway; and
10 R:PlonComnVrcJnu[esll 11500
requested Commissioner Chiniaeff to provide comments since he was serving on the
Planning Commission at the time the Mall Specific Plan and Mitigation Measures were
adopted.
Commissioner Chiniaeff provided additional information regarding the intent of the
Specific Plan, clarifying that it was planned to have a transit stop proximate to the
bookstore use, noting that this aisle would go up to the mall, locating a transit stop
proximate to the mall at the area where there is existing parking in order for people to
have a short distance from the bus to the mall access point; relayed that at one point in
time, the County was reserving the transit corridor for light rail (up Winchester Road);
noted that the park and ride facility was also planned for implementation in the parking
lot, and not necessarily at a specific parcel on the frontage due to this property being the
prime property for development of alternate uses, but that the facility would be proximate
to the mall.
Commissioner Webster relayed that the window of opportunity to place these facilities,
as planned, at the mall site has passed, unless these elements were located at Overland
Drive or at Margarita Road. In response, Commissioner Chiniaeff disagreed, noting that
the access could be off Winchester Road, but that the facility could be placed back
proximate to the mall building.
Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that staff has met with Forest City, relaying that the
outlots were not conditioned to provide these facilities, but Forest City; noted that the
condition did not specify a location or a number, advising that in discussions, Forest City
relayed amenability to planning the park and ride facility with the next phase of
development which would be submitted within approximately a month; and advised that
staff has worked with Forest City, expressing the concerns of the Planning Commission
and staff, providing assurance that this facility would be developed with the next phase
of the mall.
Commissioner Webster advised that it was his belief that opportunities were being lost
to accomplish this mission, noting that based on principle, and on the previously
expressed rationale he would not support this project.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to close the public hearing, and to adopt
staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice
vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who was absent
and Commissioner Webster who voted n._~o.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
With respect to the Milgard site, Commissioner Webster relayed that there
appeared to be an enforcement issue that needed to be addressed, noting the
plethora of outside storage at this location.
With respect to the mall site, Commissioner Webster queried when staff was going
to update the Planning Commission with respect to the landscape plan,
specifically, the lack of trees.
11 R;PlanC ornm/mJ nut es/1115OO
In response, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that she would forward the
query to Associate Planner Donahoe, and would provide an update at a future
point in time.
Commissioner Telesio requested staff to increase its efforts to provide
supplemental agenda material as soon as possible (i.e., via fax, or e-mail),
acknowledging that at times staff is not provided the material until a late point in
time; and noted that unless there was a period of time provided at the beginning of
the meeting for the Planning Commission to read the material, that the Planning
Commission could not thoroughly review the data.
In response, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that staff would make every
effort to provide the information as soon as possible, noting that the data provided
at tonight's meeting was not provided to staff until today.
With respect to establishments selling alcohol, Commissioner Telesio commented
on the enforcement issues that effectively address the negative impacts
associated with the sale of alcohol, advising that recently he had visited
Albertson's in the Palomar Center, noting that the clerk denied the sale of alcohol
due to being under the impression that the patrons were intoxicated, relaying that
this is the kind of control that the City of Temecula should encourage,
commending this clerk for her actions.
With respect to the ERACIT Program, Chairman Guerriero noted that per
discussions with the Police Department, that it had been stated to him that the
Police Department had a problem with the number of licenses that are being
granted in the City, advising that the Police Department has made this known to
ABC; and relayed that he requested the Police Department to forward any letters
addressed to ABC to the Planning Commission.
In response, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that she would obtain
additional data from Police Chief Domenoe, advising that all applications for
licensing for the sale of alcohol go to the Police Department, noting that rarely
does staff receive any negative comments. ;
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the Wolf Creek Specific Plan would
be the only item on the agenda for the December 6th Planning Commission
meeting, relaying that the second meeting in December had a full agenda; and
advised that there may be a need to consider scheduling an additional meeting in
December.
Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that an offer has been made to a Senior
Planner, noting hopes of having this position filled soon; and noted that a project
planner would also be added to staff after Thanksgiving, relaying that this
individual noted that he was having difficulty finding rental housing in the City and
therefore could not begin work soon due to the lack of affordable housing in
Temecula.
12 R:PlanComm/minutes/111500
Senior Planner Hogan relayed that on December 11, 2000 staff would be
interviewing General Plan consultants, querying whether a Planning
Commissioner could attend this meeting on the afternoon of December 11~.
In response, Commissioner Telesio volunteered to attend the meeting.
Senior Planner Hogan noted that the EIR for the Harveston Project has been
distributed to the Planning Commission for review.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:58 P.M. Chairman Guerriero formally adjourned this meeting to Wednesday,
December 6, 2000 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula.
.~--R~on~(~ro,~- - _
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske,
Director of Planning
13 R:P[anComrNrr~nutes/111500