HomeMy WebLinkAbout081401 CC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF
THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 14, 2001
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:30 P.M., on
Tuesday, August 14, 2001 in the Main Conference Room of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The Open Session of the City Council
meeting commenced at 7:06 P.M. in the City Council Chambers.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Councilmembers:
Councilmember:
Naggar, Pratt, Roberts, Stone,
and Mayor Comerchero.
Absent: None.
PRELUDE MUSIC
The prelude music was provided by Ms. Kate Welsh.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Randy R. Johnson of Temecula United Methodist
Church.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Venture Crew No. 337.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Good Neiqhbor Award Recipient
Mayor Comerchero presented Mr. and Mrs. Fundum the Good Neighbor Award for 2001,
highlighting the philanthropic actions of this couple in the community.
Recoqnition of the Temecula Valley Volleyball Club "Vipe¢' - National Champions
After Mayor Comerchero recognized the national volleyball champions from the
Temecula Valley Volleyball Club, a video presentation was provided, outlining this
team's accomplishments, Mayor Comerchero recommending that the seen where the
winning championship point was made be included in the year-end review of the City
events.
Balloon and Wine Festival Presentation
Presenting a signed framed poster to the City representing the 2001 Balloon and Wine
Festival Event, Mr. Rusty Manning relayed gratitude to the City Council for its support.
R;\Minutes\081401 I
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ms. Charolette Fox, representing the Master Gardeners, provided an overview of the
upcoming Gardening Symposium Event which was scheduled for September 1st from 9:00
A.M. to 4:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Updating the City Council and the community regarding the Temecula Alternative Fuel
Working Group meeting, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts noted the receipt of a $250,000 grant,
specifying hopes of receiving three additional upcoming grants, relaying the goal to
implement a program whereby there would be an agreement to purchase new alternative
fuel vehicles for a minimum of ten heavy- or medium-duty vehicles in this area, noting the
various entities involved with the agreement.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included
in the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of July 10, 2001.
Resolution approvin.q List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-69
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2001
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2001.
2
3
R;\Minutes\081401 2
5 Purchase of City Vehicles
7
8
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
Approve the purchase of one 2001 Ford Ranger from Rancho Ford at
$16,856.26; two Ford Y2 ton, four-wheel drive, pick-up trucks from Ranch
Ford at $45,035.28; one 2001 Chevrolet ~,~ ton, four-wheel drive, four-door
pick-up truck from Paradise at $31,317.98; and one 2001 Ford utility truck
from Rancho Ford at $54,825.00.
Records Destruction Report
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with
the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Approval of Contracts for Plan Review Services
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1
7.2
Approve a three-year agreement for Consultant Services with Esgil
Corporation to perform plan review services for the Building and Safety
Department for a total amount not to exceed $100,000.00 annually.
Approve a three-year agreement for Consultant Services with VanDorpe
Chou and Associates to perform plan review services for the Building and
Safety Department for a total amount not to exceed $100,000.00 annually.
Consideration of The Inland Empire Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
9
Race for the Cure Sponsorship Request
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1
Approve the event sponsorship agreement in the amount of $25,000 with the
Inland Empire Affiliate of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
This item was pulled for separate discussion; see page 6,
Approve Sponsorship Requests for the Temecula Town Association Special
Events
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve funding for the Rod Run for actual City-support costs in the amount
up to $34,880;
9.2 Approve funding for the Frontier Days Rodeo for actual City-support costs in
the amount up to $8,470;
R;'~linutes\081401 3
11
12
10
9.3costsAppr°Vein thefundingamountf°r upthetoGreat$15,720.Temecula Tractor Race for actual City-support
~3_14.3.-6 _23143-7 23143-8 23143-9 23143-10 23143-11 and
23143-F located south of Pauba Road east of Butterfield Sta e Road and north
of De Porto/a Road now in conformance with its od inal a royals.
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve Tract Map Nos. 23143-6, 23143-7, 23143-8, 23143-9, 23143-10,
23143-11, and 23143-F in conformance with the conditions of approval;
10.2 Approve the Subdivision improvement Agreements;
10.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreements and accept the Faithful
Performance Bonds, Labor and Material Bonds, and Monument Bonds as
security for the agreements.
_Tract Map No. 23209 - Subdivision Aqreeme~,!
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Approve the Subdivision Agreement and accept the Performance Bond
security to guarantee the performance of the subdivider under this
agreement.
Professional Services Aqreement for Desi,qn Services - Fire Station Wolf Crcc~;
Site - Project No. PW01-11
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Approve an acceleration of $100,000.00 from the Capital Improvement
Program Budget for FY2002-03 to the current FY2001-02 budget for the Fire
Station Wolf Creek Site - Project No. PW01-11;
12.2
12.3
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with STK Amhitecture, Inc. in
an amount not to exceed $159,500.00 to provide design services for the Fire
Station Wolf Creek Site - Project No. PW01-11 - within the planned wolf
Creek Development and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments/change orders not to
exceed the contingency amount of $15,950.00, which is equal to 10% of the
agreement.
This item was pulled for separate discussion; see page 6.
R;\Minutes\081401 4
13 Completion and Acceptance for the Low-Flow Crossinq at Via Montezuma
Project No. PW99-15
14
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Accept the project for the Low-Flow Crossing at Via Montezuma - Project
No. PW99-15 - as complete;
13.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a · one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
13.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the
Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed.
Completion and Acceptance of the Liqht Emittinq Diode (LED) Traffic Si.qna
Conversion Proqram - Project Number PW01-0R
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Accept the Light Emitting Diode (LED) Traffic Signal Conversion Program -
Project No. PW01-03 - project as complete;
14.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a
one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and
14.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the notice
of completion, if no liens have been filed.
15 Parcel Map No. 30044 (located on the south east corner of Dendy Parkway and
Winchester Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 30044 in conformance with the conditions of
approval;
15.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument
Bond as security for the agreement.
16 Roripauqh Specific Plan - Status Report
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Receive and file.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-7, 9-11,
and 13-16, Item Nos. 8 and 12 being pulled for separate consideration. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with
the exception of who was absent.
R;\Minutes\081401 5
At this time the City Council considered Consent Calendar Item Nos. 8 and 12
which were pulled for separate consideration.
8 Consideration of The Inland Empire Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
Race for the Cure Sponsorship Request
RECOMMENDATION:
8.2
Approve the event sponsorship agreement in the amount of $25,000 with the
Inland Empire Affiliate of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
Thanking the City Council for its support of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer
Foundation Race, Ms. Joan Sparkman distributed T-shirts to the Councilmembers.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation.. The motion
was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
12 Professional Services Aqreement for Desiqn Services - Fire Station Wolf Creek
Site - Project No. PW01-11
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1
Approve an acceleration of $100,000.00 from the Capital Improvement
Program Budget for FY2002-03 to the current FY2001-02 budget for the Fire
Station Wolf Creek Site - Project No. PW01-11;
12.2
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with STK Architecture, Inc. in
an amount not to exceed $159,500.00 to provide design services for the Fire
Station Wolf Creek Site - Project No. PW01-11 - within the planned wolf
Creek Development and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement;
12.4
Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments/change orders not to
exceed the contingency amount of $15,950.00, which is equal to 10% of the
agreement.
Mr. William Griffith, representing Spring Pacific Properties, noted the applicant's support
of the recommendation to accelerate the construction of the Fire Station in the Wolf
Creek area, noting that this was a much-needed public infrastructure; and provided an
overview of the Wolf Creek applicant's alternate improvements in the community.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation; and to direct
staff to begin efforts regarding expanding the Faster Ambulance Service in Temecula
(FAST) Program, planning a paramedic service on the south side of the City,
recommending that this service be in place by July of 2002. The motion was seconded
by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
At 7:34 P. M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District
and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, recessing at 7:53 P.M., and reconvening at
8:09 P.M., with regularly scheduled City Council business.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
R;~Minutes~081401 6
17
Harveston
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR
THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED
ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT
TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH FOR THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN,
LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA
ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMITS
(PLANNING APPLICATION 00-0189)
17.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-71
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 99-0419 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) FOR THE
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AREA AND THE TWO
EXCLUDED PARCELS WITHIN THE SPECIFIC PLAN
ON PARCELS TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED EAST
OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS
CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF
THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT
17.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-72
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13
(PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0418) ON PARCELS
TOTALING 550 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF
INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS
CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF
THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT
R;'~Vlin utes\081401 7
17.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-07
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ZONE CHANGE,
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AMENDING SECTION 17.16.070 OF
THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ADOPTING
ZONING STANDARDS FOR THE HARVESTON
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 13 ON PARCELS TOTALING 550
ACRES LOCATED ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 15,
NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF
MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN
CITY LIMIT (PLANNING APPLICATION 99-0245)
17.5 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-08
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN
AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND LENNAR COMMUNITIES AND
WINCHESTER HILLS I LLC" FOR THE HARVESTON
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
99-O446)
17.6 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-73
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 00-0295 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29639, THE
SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 550 ACRES INTO
91 LOTS WHICH CONFORM TO THE PLANNING
AREAS, OPEN SPACE AREAS, SCHOOL AND PARK
SITES OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN
LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF
SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA
ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT,
AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL
NOS. 910-261-001, 910-261-002, 910-110-013, 910-110-
015, 910-110-020, 910-110-021, 910-110-027, 910-110-
076, 910-100-007, 910-100-008, 910-060-009, 910-120-
008, 911-630-001, 911-630-002, 911-630-003, 911-640-
001, 911-640-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-
004, 911-180-008, 911-180-009, 911-180-015, 911-180-
023 AND 911-180-028
R;\Minutes\081401 8
17.7 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-74
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 01-0030 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29928, THE
SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES INTO
140 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 21 OPEN SPACE LOTS
IN PLANNING AREA 7 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC
PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, NORTH
OF SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK, WEST OF
MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF THE NORTHERN
CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911-180-003, 911-180-004,
911-640-001 AND 911-630-003
17.8 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 01-0031 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 29929, THE
SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES INTO
118 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN
A PORTION OF PLANNING AREAS 3 AND 4 OF THE
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF
INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS
CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF
THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER
IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 910-261-
001, 910-261-002, 911-180-002, 911-180-003, 911-180-
004 AND 911-180-015
17.9 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 01-76
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 01-0032 - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30088, THE
SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.18 ACRES INTO
38 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 8 OPEN SPACE LOTS IN
A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 4 OF THE
HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN; LOCATED EAST OF
INTERSTATE 15, NORTH OF SANTA GERTRUDIS
CREEK, WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND SOUTH OF
THE NORTHERN CITY LIMIT, AND FURTHER
IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 911-630-
001,911-630-002 AND 911-180-015
R;'~linutes\081401 9
The Staff Report is Presented
Noting that this item had been continued from the July 24th City Council meeting in order
for staff to address concerns raised by the representatives of the City of Murrieta and
Channell Corporation, Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed that the Subcommittee,
staff, and the applicant met with the Murrieta representatives and addressed the
concerns of the Channel Corporation, advising that the following items were agreed to:
Lennar Communities and Winchester Properties agreed to allow the imposition of a
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), if adopted by the County
(implemented via the DA);
The City of Temecula agreed to pledge a sum equal to a minimum of fifty percent
(50%) of the sales tax revenues generated from the Winchester Hills commercial
property that would be dedicated towards the Cherry Street Interchange or the
Date/Cherry Streets Corridor (implemented via the resolutions in the Specific Plan).
With respect to traffic mitigation in the City of Murrieta, Lennar Communities has
agreed to pay the City of Murrieta $603,800 for improvements in the City of
Murrieta (implemented via the DA);
With respect to the City of Murrieta's review of future traffic studies, the City of
Temecula agreed to provide the City of Murrieta with all subsequent traffic studies
relating to the project (implemented via the resolutions); and
With respect to the Channel Corporation issues, four conditions have been added
to the Conditions of Approval for the project which allay the concerns previously
expressed, noting that with the inclusion of these conditions, Channell Corporation
agrees to withdraw its previous objections to the project (referencing a letter from
the Channell Corporation representatives dated August 14, 2001).
For Councilman Stone, Deputy City Manager Thornhill advised that the applicant was
agreeable to the above-mentioned changes.
For clarification, City Attorney Thorson noted that the changes recommended to the
Specific Plan by the Planning Commission are attached as Item No. 13 in the agenda
packets, and that all of the revisions relating to the issues raised by Channell
Corporation and the City of Murrieta are attached as Item No. 22.
The Public is Invited to Comment
The following individuals spoke as proponents of the project:
Mr, Mark S, Bailey
Mr. David Neault
Mr. Jon Solter
Mr. John Dedovesh
Ms. Malinda Smith
Mr. Greg Morrison
Mr. Jack VanHaaster
Dr. Robert Wheeler
44763 CaIle Banuelos
41877 Enterprise Circle
39400 Canyon Rim Circle
39450 Long Ridge Drive
29705 Solana Way
30727 Loma Linda Road
24641 Washington Avenue
29090 Camino Alba Murrieta
representing Temecula Valley Pop Warner
representing A.B,C.Child Care Center
representing the City of Murdeta
R;'~vlinutes\081401 t0
The above-mentioned individuals were in favor of the project for the following reasons:
The project design elements supercede alternate developments in the area, setting a
new standard for projects.
This proposal should be the trendsetter for projects that the County approves.
The community's need for the open space and recreational facility provisions.
Commended the applicant for the elementary school for Harveston which has
already been built prior to project's approval, noting the commitment to the City.
Opposed to this project being placed on ballot which would thwart the planning
process.
The mixture of densities and diverse housing opportunities would be beneficial to the
community.
The negative traffic impacts in the City of Temecula are primarily generated from
areas outside of Temecula.
Queried why the City of Murrieta has not ~equested the County projects to contribute
to traffic mitigation and not just projects within the City of Temecula.
Commended staff and the City Council for the years of work contributing to this
particular proposal.
This type of project would perpetuate the wonderful community Temecula is.
The infrastructure the developer would be implement.
Relayed the residents' desire to have sensible growth, allowing for the continued
quality of life, economic viability, and strong business-friendly environment that the
community has grown accustomed to, advising that this project goes above and
beyond the requirements, exceeding all expectations.
Noted opposition to the select few are attempting to sideline the legitimate planning
process, requiring certain projects to subscribe to a process that others have not
(i.e., placing the project on the ballot).
Thanked staff and the City Council Subcommittee members for meeting with
representatives from the City of Murrieta to address its concerns, requesting that the
Murrieta representatives be involved in the future process of reviewing traffic studies.
Relayed that in the future the public will be utilizing public transit, recommending that
there be coordinated efforts with the County to develop a transit system.
Commending Mr. Bailey for his efforts regarding Pop Warner Football, Councilman
Stone noted that there were 8-10 Pop Warner teams practicing at the same time,
confirming the need for additional sports fields; and queried how many youths were
involved in the program. In response, Mr. Bailey noted that in tackle football there were
485 participants, and 66 involved with flag football.
For Naggar, Mr. Neault reiterated that he would be working on the project with respect to
the vegetable garden that would be installed at the school site with separate plots for
each class; and for Councilman Stone, noted that outside of the School District project
he would not be involved in this project's development.
In response to Councilman Naggar, Mr. VanHaaster relayed that per the traffic study of
Murrieta there would potentially be two additional roads connecting to Temecula (Ynez
and Diaz Roads), contingent upon the completion of the Interchange Project; and
confirmed that at this time there is no funding designated from the City of Murrieta to
contribute to the Interchange Project.
R;\Minutes\081401 ti
Addressing Councilman Naggar's queries, Deputy City Manager Thornhill confirmed that
Murrieta's review of future traffic studies related to this project would be included in the
resolutions associated for the project, City Manager Nelson providing additional
clarification, noting that in subsequent traffic studies, the Public Works Department
would have opportunities to comment and make appropriate changes, as necessary,
Senior Planner Hogan providing additional information, confirming that if an additional
improvements were necessary that the work could be required to be implemented prior
to further development.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts commented on the efforts of both the Cities of Murrieta and
Temecula to have a specific traffic improvement project designated in hopes of receiving
the extension Measure A funding.
Reiterating Mr. VanHaaster's comments that he was pleased with the level of
cooperation from the City of Temecula, Mayor Comerchero requested that this message
be forwarded to the Murrieta City Council, relaying hopes of a renewed era of
cooperation between the two Cities.
For Councilman Naggar, Dr. Wheeler clarified that mass transit would be required in the
future in his opinion, noting that over time driving patterns could be changed.
For the record, City Clerk Jones relayed that Ms. Penny Alexander-Kelley, attorney for
the Channell Corporation had requested that the City's receipt of her letter dated'August
14, 2001, be noted.
The following individuals spoke ~n opposition to the project:
[] Mr. Mark Broderick
[] Mr. Carl Ross
45501 Clubhouse Drive
43886 Butternut Drive
The above-mentioned individuals were not in favor of the project for the following
reasons:
Clarified that the applicant did not have discussions with Mr. Broderick, as indicated
at the last hearing, although Mr. Broderick did receive information from the
applicant's environmental consultant, and did attend a meeting reviewing the Land
Use Plan which was abruptly stopped.
Noted that over half of the Land Use designations incorporate high-density, small lot
housing products which is not appropriate in the City of Temecula.
Relayed that the consultant preparing the traffic studies for this project had
previously prepared the City of Temecula's 1999 study which was paid for, but not
adopted.
Noted the City's opposition to the County's high density project, requesting that the
City Council be consistent and oppose this project.
Objected to the option the developer has to build homes on 2,000 square foot lots in
Planning Area Nos. 3, 5, 9, and 11, recommending that this option be eliminated.
R;\Minutes\081401 12
The Applicant's Rebuttal
Mr. Becker addressed the following issues:
For Naggar, with respect to the School Agreement, clarified that regarding the
elementary school which has been constructed prior to the project's approval, that to
the best of his knowledge the applicant would not be able to transfer or sell those
credits if this project was not developed.
With respect to the Service Commercial portion of the Agreement, noted the
applicant's desire to extend this for fifteen years, relaying the delay in being able to
initiate development on this property which has been discussed with staff, and in the
meetings with the City of Murrieta.
Clarified that it was one of the developer's consultants that had communicated with
Mr. Broderick (and not the developer, himself), addressing his concerns regarding
Land Use considerations.
Advised that "quality of life" was a relative term, noting that various individuals were
of the opinion that quality of life could be attained with a wide range of homesites
which provides homeownership opportunities for a larger range of potential buyers,
relaying the efforts to create a quality project.
Clarified that the density was not being increased.
Noted that while there were minimum square foot homesites allowed in each
planning area, that there was also a maximum number of units permitted, ergo if
clustering product was implemented there would be additional open space or
alternate recreation uses.
After additional discussion ensued regarding setting a time limit for the City Council
questioning period, it was the general consensus of the City Council (Councilman
Naggar noting his opposition) to allow 15 minutes per each Councilmember.
Addressing the comments and questions of the City Council~ the followin.q
information was provided by the applicant's representatives and staff:
In response to Councilman Naq.qar's comments, the followinq data was relayed:
Addressing the reference from the newspaper where it was stated that the applicant was
willing to stand behind the traffic analysis, Mr. Becker advised that the applicant was
prepared to defend this analysis legally.
With respect to the traffic study that the City did not adopt which was prepared by the
same traffic consultants for this project, Mr. Davis confirmed that much of the same data
was incorporated into this project's analysis due to the study being the most recent data
for the City at build out; noted that the projections for the Levels of Service (LOSs)
indicated were based on a long-range forecast, advising that the study did not include
any shift towards transit, or any changes due to additional mitigation measures;
confirmed that the original General Plan Circulation Element would render worsened
LOSs; and clarified that with all the cumulative impacts of the City (without additional
mitigation) the denoted LOSs were anticipated (including a LOS of F and E at specified
intersections.)
Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that while Caltrans has not approved the
Date/Cherry Streets Intemhange Project yet, that the Draft Project Study Report had
R;\Minutes\081401 13
been received and would be circulated for adoption; and noted that October was the
estimated date for approval from Caltrans.
With respect to parking provisions at the lake, Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed
that staff was satisfied with the provisions based on the size of the facility, advising that if
the lake is made accessible to the public, it would most likely necessitate some design
changes.
Mr. Davis confirmed that Clinton Keith Road was assumed to go through in the full build
out analysis.
In response to queries regarding the acquisition of off-site property failed to be acquired
by the applicant but required for the construction of off-site improvements (denoted in
the DA on page 12), City Attorney Thorson confirmed that if the developer cannot
acquire the denoted properties, the City would be able to acquire the property for the
necessary improvements, advising that it was likely that the project would only go
forward if the City acquired the property that the developer was unable to.
City Manager Nelson confirmed that with respect to the Development Fee, all of those
monies were being utilized for road improvements, confirming that the agreed fee was
$1500 per unit.
Mr. Becker confirmed that the SMART Shuttle Program Agreement was for a period of
two years.
Mr. Storm relayed that the lake maintenance would cost approximately $4,000 per
month, advising that the City's fifty percent (50%) share would be approximately $2,000.
Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that adjustments could be made to the traffic
improvement plans as subsequent traffic studies were reviewed to address specific
impacts; and clarified that the DA was now requiring that the improvements be installed
upfront.
In resPonse to Councilman Stone's comments, the followinq information was
retayed:
Mr. Davis confirmed that if the project was not developed, yet all the improvements
associated with the project were implemented, the traffic count would change,
somewhat, in the localized project area, but that from 1-2 miles away from the project,
the changes in traffic (without the project) would be insignificant, confirming that the
deterioration at the intersections was primarily impacted from cumulative effects from
outside the City limits; noted that with the Harveston Project implemented and the
improvements installed, none of the intersections would be compromised (below a LOS
of D) once the project builds out; with respect to Condition No. 47, advising that this
condition addressed traffic studies that would be conducted in the future in order for
more precise assumptions to be made; and relayed that he has been working as a traffic
engineer for over 23 years.
For the record, Councilman Stone noted that after reviewing the plans, he was satisfied
with the parking provisions at the lake facility, relaying that pedestrian, and bicycle travel
should be encouraged.
R;\Minutes\081401 14
With respect to the traffic calming elements viewed in south Orange County, Councilman
Stone relayed the desire for assurance that the direction to staff, specifically Fire
Department personnel, was to investigate the feasibility of installing these elements due
to the ambience created. In response, City Manager Nelson confirmed that staff would
be investigating this matter.
In response to Councilman Pratt's comments, the followinq information was
relayed:
For Councilman Pratt, Mr. Becker relayed that he would be willing to have discussions
with other developers to investigate the potential of the private sector working in
conjunction with the public sector to provide a public transportation system.
In response to Mavor Pro Tern Roberts' comments the following information was
relayed:
Mr. Becker relayed that Lennar Communities would be contributing $300,000 for a
shuttle service; and confirmed that within the commitment to the SMART shuttle
Program, the applicant would be willing to refine the plan to provide specific school
routes, in particular to the middle school.
In response to Mayor Comerchero's comments, the followin.q information was
relayed:
Noting that he served on the Subcommittee that addressed the transportation
enhancement program associated with this project, Mayor Comerchero relayed that
Mayor Pro Tern Roberts' recommendation could be easily incorporated into the plan,
making the shuttles available in the mornings and afternoons for school transport, and
maintaining the regular routes during the balance of the day.
Mr. Becker advised that per Mayor Comerchero's request, the applicant has agreed to
deed in fee the lake, and the Lake Park, to the City, noting the fifty pement (50%)
contribution for the lake maintenance from the City, and the balance being maintained by
the HOA; and advised that efforts are being made at this time to develop the rules and
regulations associated with the lake which would be encompassed in an additional
agreement which would be brought before the City Council at a future point in time.
Mr. Bill Storm specified the parking provisions at the lake, confirming that these parking
areas would not negatively impact any residential homesites.
Mr. Becker outlined the infrastructure which would be installed prior to the construction
of homes which totals approximately $34 million in public improvements Prior to any
Occupancy.
The meeting recessed at 9:50 P.M., reconvening at 10:00 P.M.
At this time Mayor Comerchero closed the public hearing.
The City Council Provided Closin,q Comments
Enumerating the elements of the plan that he was pleased with in the Harveston Project
Plan, Mayor Pro Tem Roberts relayed that this proposal included the first true Village
Concept implementation in Temecula, additionally noting the lake, the Lake Park, the
amphitheater, the 52.9 acres of parkland, and the traffic improvements; with respect to
R;\Minutes\081401 15
the density issue, noted the varied desires in the community, referencing other areas in
the community; advised that he could find no negative elements associated with this
particular project, relaying his extensive review on the project inclusive of serving on the
Subcommittee, additionally, noting the tours to Orange County to visit other Lennar
developments; and relayed his support of this project.
Noting that he recently read every page of the General Plan, and this particular
Development Agreement, Councilman Pratt noted his goal to address a traffic plan
which in turn would address all the other issues related to growth, relaying the eight
points of his plan, as follows: 1 ) referenced the General Plan Circulation Element
(denoted as Government Code Section 65302 B) which requires the following in
circulation eTements - a circulation element consisting of the general location and extent
of existing and proposed thoroughfares, transport routes, terminals, and other local
public utilities and facilities all correlated with the land, 2) the health, safety, and welfare
of the citizens are in jeopardy as a result of this period of over eight years of unbalanced
execution of the requirements of the General Plan (denoted as California Code Section
65858 A), 3) Temecula is a traffic destination and pass-through area, ergo cumulative
traffic mitigation is mandatory, and the present conditions of lack of convenient public
transportation is the failure of the City to execute equitable all the elements of the
General Plan, 4) no further building permits for further construction permits should be
issued until a mandatory approach to traffic mitigation is in place, 5) an alternate choice
for convenient public transport should be provided, 6) the citizens need to participate in
permanent zero tolerance traffic moving violations with continuing upgrades, 7) the
above-mentioned program can be implemented prior to the 2001 Christmas season with
the cooperation of staff and the City Council, and 8) noted that he had additional data
related to funding sources for this program; concluded that growth was inevitable; noted
that this particular project would not have a specific negative general impact if this
program was in place; clarified that while he was pleased with this particular project, that
to move forward there would need to be plan for a public transit system.
Councilman Naggar noted that the difference between this project and other projects
was that it would determine whether the City heads toward urban big-city development
or maintain a suburban rural atmosphere; commented on the new concepts included in
the project, the clustering of homes, the creation of transit nodes, and the Village Center
to induce people to walk, advising that he was uncertain whether this type of planning is
effective; relayed that he had gone door-to-door to gain the public's input regarding the
Harveston Project, noting what while initially the public expressed that they were pleased
with the proposal, that after he relayed the proposed lot sizes, and the traffic concerns,
that individuals began to query the benefits of this project; relayed his strong reluctance
to create a community that looks like the areas residents left, to move here; advised that
since these points we his own opinions, he would not be opposed to submitting this
project before the voters; clarified that while there were elements in the project that he
was pleased with, that in order for him to support the proposal, the plan would need to
eliminate lot sizes under 6,000 square feet, the apartment complexes would have to be
at a density of 7-12 units per acre, there would need to be a LOS D traffic guarantee,
there would need to be a date specific, or a plan, and an identified measure of funding
for the Date Street/Cherry Street Interchange Project, the approval of the project would
need to be postponed until the County's Traffic Model is revealed in September, the
shuttle bus program would need to be extended to five-six years, and the Ynez Road
connection would need to go through; and relayed his concern regarding what projects
R;'Wlinutes\081401 16
will now not be completed since $1 million from the DA has been dedicated towards the
hook offramp.
In response to Councilman Naggar's comments that this project was analogous to the
upzones in the County that the City has litigated against, Councilman Stone questioned
Deputy City Manager Thornhill whether this property was upzoned with this project. In
response, Deputy City Manager Thornhill confirmed that this property was not upzoned
with this project.
Continuing his comments, Councilman Stone clarified that densities have been
reduced by eight percent (8%) since he has served on the City Council; noted that this
particular developer has already spent $10.5 million on infrastructure, and has
committed to $7 million in discretionary funds, relaying his support for the $1 million to
be dedicated for the hook ramp on the south side of the 1-15 freeway, additionally,
reiterating his recommendation that another $1 million be dedicated for the construction
of the overcrossing; advised that he supported the fifty percent (50%) sales tax from the
commercial portion of this project being dedicated to the overcrossing project; with
respect to the smaller lots permitted in various planning areas, noted the trade-off
benefits, inclusive of a lake, an outdoor amphitheater, and parking provisions for 980
cars; opined that staff and the applicant have developed a project plan that the citizens
will enjoy and appreciate; relayed the benefits of the diverse range of housing products;
addressed this project being placed on the ballot, noting the expertise of the review of
the property by staff, the hours the Planning Commission and City Council have spent
reviewing the project, advising that the City Council is a body placed in government by
the voters to make these decisions affer a plethora of investigative review; provided a
history of the contributions this property owner has made to the City; referenced Dr.
Wheeler's comments, reiterating that it is the City that is going to drive the traffic
solutions, not the developer, noting the improvements required with the project; advised
that it was critical that the County be held responsible for the cumulative impacts that
create significant negative effects on the City, noting his plan to work in conjunction with
the City of Murrieta to address the unmitigated growth in the County; enumerated the
benefits of this project, inclusive of the pedestrian-orientation, the excellent design
elements, and the implementation of the Village Concept; noted appreciation for the
applicant's willingness to address and mitigate the concerns of Murrieta as well as
Channel Corporation; addressed traffic concerns, reiterating that a traffic study will be
conducted with every phase of the project; and relayed his strong support of the project.
Noting that the diverse housing products will offer a wide range of varied opportunities,
Mayor Comerchero advised that he viewed this element of the plan as a benefit,
creating choices for the residents; clarified that the City of Temecula was suing the
County, not for allowing small lot sizes, but for violating its General Plan, ergo negatively
impacting Temecula; relayed that he was pleased with the hometown character the
design elements associated with this project create; with respect to traffic, opined that
the solution lies with addressing regional traffic (i.e., implementing freeway flyers to the
Metrolink stations in the northern part of the County, as well as down to San Diego);
clarified that the existing traffic conditions will be improved with this project since the
improvements will address impacts above and beyond the project's generated traffic;
with respect to the funding provided by the applicant to RTA for the shuttle project, noted
that this project was a demonstration program, relaying that, if successful, RTA will
determine whether, or not, to continue the system and place in RTA's operating budget;
opined that this particular project was outstanding, and that the City of Temecula will be
R;\Minutes\081401 ]7
more benefited with its implementation than without it, enumerating the assets
associated with this proposal.
Reiterating that this was a good project plan, Councilman Pratt emphasized the need
for a comprehensive bus system, noting that his plan for mass transit could be
implemented by this Christmas season.
In response to Councilman Pratt, Councilman Stone relayed that this project should not
be made to bear the burden of the regional traffic impacts; and offered a commitment to
serve with Councilman Pratt to develop a cost-effective regional comprehensive
transportation plan for the City of Temecula, coordinating with the neighboring agencies,
if Councilman Pratt would acknowledge the $300,000 contribution of this applicant to
initiate a bus system (implemented in part to address Councilman Pratt's concerns), and
not hold this developer hostage for impacts outside of this project's influence.
Councilman Pratt reiterated the importance to expedite a plan for a mass transit
system.
For clarification, and in response to Councilman Naggar's queries regarding Councilman
Stone's comment that the lake was 20 acres, Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that
the Lake Park was 17.3 acres, and the lake was 8.4 acres.
Councilman Naggar noted that per discussions with the bonding agency, the LOS D
could be maintained as a standard at the intersections as long as withholding building
permits was not for an indefinite period of time.
With respect to the motion, City Attorney Thorson noted that there are nine resolutions
and ordinances on page nos. 1-4 of the agenda report, relaying that staff's
recommendation was to approve those with the changes recommended by the Planning
Commission, denoted in Attachment No. 13, the changes to the various documents
setforth in Attachment No. 22, and the revised language addressing the TUMF fees
which was distributed to the City Council as supplemental agenda material; noted the
recommendation to add the 15-year term to the Service Commercial area on the DA;
and requested the City Council to take action separately for each recommendation,
confirming, for Councilman Stone, that the above-mentioned changes would be part of
each resolution and ordinance.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation with respect to
Item 17.1, approving the EIR findings, adopting Resolution No. 01-70. Mayor Pro Tern
Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Councilman Naggar who voted no and Councilman Pratt who abstained.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation with respect to
Item 17.2, approving the General Plan Amendment for Harveston, adopting Resolution
No. 01-71. Mayor Pro Tern Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Councilman Naggar who voted n._9o and Councilman Pratt
who abstained.
R;\Minutes\081401 18
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation with respect to
Item 17.3, approving adoption of the Specific Plan, adopting Resolution No. 01-72.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Councilman Naggar who voted no and Councilman Pratt who abstained.
City Attorney Thorson introduced and read by title only Ordinance No. 01-07.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation with respect to
item 17.4, the introduction and reading by title only Ordinance No. 01-07. Mayor Pro
Tern Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception
of Councilman Naggar who voted n_go and Councilman Pratt who abstained.
City Attorney Thorson introduced and read by title only Ordinance No. 01-08.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation with respect to
Item 17.5, the introduction and reading by title only Ordinance No. 01-08. Mayor Pro
Tem Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception
of Councilman Naggar who voted no and Councilman Pratt who abstained.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation with respect to
Item 17.6, approving Tentative Tract Map No. 29639, adopting Resolution No. 01-73.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Councilman Naggar who voted no and Councilman Pratt who abstained.
MOTION: Councitman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation with respect to
Item 17.7, approving Tentative Tract Map No. 29928, adopting resolution No. 01-74.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Councilman Naggar who voted n._9o and Councilman Pratt who abstained.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation with respect to
item 17.8, approving Tentative Tract Map No. 29929, adopting Resolution No. 01-75.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Councilman Naggar who voted n_go and Councilman Pratt who abstained.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff's recommendation with respect to
Item 17.9, approving Tentative Tract Map No. 30088, adopting Resolution No. 01-76.
Mayor Pro Tem Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Councilman Naggar who voted no and Councilman Pratt who abstained.
18
Plannin.q Application No. 01-0121 (5th One-Year Extension of Time-Appeal)
Tentative Tract Map No. 23209 (located east of the intersection of La Serena Way
and Walcott Lane alonq Butterfield Staqe Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Withdraw the appeal of Condition of Approval No. 33.
Mayor Comerchero noted that the applicant has withdrawn his appeal, ergo this item
would be removed from the agenda.
R;~inutes\081401 1~)
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19 Prima Facie Speed Limit on Certain Streets (Temeku Hills)
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-09
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADDING SECTION 10.44.010 TO THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE DESIGNATING
HONORS DRIVE FROM MARGARITA ROAD TO TEE
DRIVE AND TEMEKU DRIVE FROM TEE DRIVE TO LA
SERENA WAY AS ROADS ON WHICH GOLF CARTS
ARE PERMITTED PURSUANT TO VEHICLE CODE
SECTION 21115 AND SETTING THE SPEED LIMIT
THEREON
19.2 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-10
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING SECTION 10.44.010
TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE DESIGNATING
HONORS DRIVE FROM MARGARITA ROAD TO TEE
DRIVE AND TEMEKU DRIVE FROM TEE DRIVE TO LA
SERENA WAY AS ROADS ON WHICH GOLF CARTS
ARE PERMI'I-FED PURSUANT TO VEHICLE CODE
SECTION 21115 AND SE'I-rING THE SPEED LIMIT
THEREON
Director of Public Works Hughes presented the staff report (of record), highlighting the
three objectives of this action item, as follows: 1) to establish a legal, enforceable speed
limit on Temeku Drive and Honors Way, 2) to perfect the street designations within the
Temeku Hills Project in conformance with the California Vehicle Code which will allow
golf carts to use these particular streets, and 3) to establish rules and regulations to
govern the use of these roads by golf carts; provided a brief history of the development
which was originally proposed as a private gated community; advised that the streets
have recently been accepted into the City for maintenance purposes; noted the speed
surveys conducted in this area; relayed that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 MPH, which staff supports; noted that
various residents had expressed a desire for a speed limit of 25 MPH (although this
would be below the 85th percentile of speeds traveled in this area) based on the Vehicle
Code which allows for the use of golf carts on public streets once the streets have been
designated; advised that per discussions with City Attorney Thorson, it has been relayed
that the City Council can set the lower speed limit, if desired; and clarified staff's
recommendation to set the limit at 35 MPH, and to re-stripe the streets in order to
provide areas for only golf cart use, specifying the concern of staff at setting the speed
R;~Vlinutes\081401 :20
limit at 25 MPH, which could render a worsened condition due to the speed not being
reasonable, citing examples in alternate cities.
Dr. Mark Wedel, 41522 Temeku Drive, presented a PowerPoint presentation, providing
data related to the desire to establish a reasonable speed limit which would be
enforceable; highlighted the history of the development, the current speeds of vehicles
driven in this area; and recommended establishing a 25 MPH speed limit throughout
Temeku Hills, to have the Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) posted in this area,
and to install stop signs.
Thanking the City Council for its contributions to the community, Mr. Bill Miner,
representing the Temeku Hills Masters Association, reiterated that this development was
approved as a golf car community; and opined that these particular streets were not
designed to accommodate traffic traveling at 35 MPH, advising that the speed limit
should be posted at 25 MPH as mandated by the Vehicle Code for a golf cart designated
community.
Mr. Jim Dent, representing the Temeku Hills Master Association, relayed his concern
with respect to safety due to the school bus drop-off areas, and the near-blind
intersections; and supported the recommendation to establish a 25 MPH speed limit.
MOTION: Noting his support of the residents' desire to establish a 25 MPH speed limit,
Councilman Stone moved to close the public hearing; to direct the NET Officers to this
area, and to provide a one-week warning time for residents (with placement of the radar
trailer) prior to the issuance of citations; and to approve the introduction of Ordinance
No. 01-09. subject to a 25 MPH speed limit being established. Mayor Pro Tern Roberts
seconded the motion. (Ultimately this motion passed; see page 22.)
The City Council commented on its support of establishing a 25 MPH speed limit in this
area, Mayor Comerchero suggesting that since there was only a small portion of the
Temeku Hills residents present, that in 12 months, that a citizen survey be conducted in
order to determine whether the majority of residents were desirous of maintaining the 25
MPH speed limit.
Councilman Stone, echoed by Mayor Pro Tern Roberts, relayed that due to the HOA
representatives being present, and the safety issues at hand he would not be in favor of
conducting a survey in 12 months.
For clarification, City Attorney Thorson noted that while this area has always been
designated as a golf cart area, it did not have the findings required by the Vehicle Code,
nor the rules and regulations, ergo it was determined that these findings should be
clarified which will aid in enforcement; and specified that the recommendation was for
the adoption of two ordinances, one an urgency ordinance, in order to expedite the
enforcement of the speed limit.
For Councilman Naggar, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the City Council's
action included designation of a portion of the roadway being set aside for golf carts
only.
City Attorney Thorson introduced and read by title only Ordinance No. 01-09, specifying
that the speed limit be designated at 25 MPH.
R;\Minutes\081401 21
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval of the motion (as
denoted on page 22.)
City Attorney Thorson read by title Ordinance No. 01-10 into the record, specifying that
the speed limit would be designated at 25 MPH.
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to adopt Ordinance No. 01-10. Mayor Pro Tem
Roberts seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
20 Amendment to City Commissioners Compensation
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-11
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION
2.40.100 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO COMPENSATION FOR CITY
COMMISSIONERS
20.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 01-12
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 2.40.100 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
COMPENSATION FOR CITY COMMISSIONERS
City Attorney Thorson read into the record, by title only Ordinance No. 01-11.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Roberts moved to adopt Ordinance No. 01-11. The motion
was seconded by Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
City Attorney Thorson read into the record, by title only Ordinance No. 01-12.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to approve the introduction and of Ordinance
No. 01-12. The motion was seconded Councilman Naggar and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
R;'~Minutes\081401 22
21 Appointment of State Lobbyist Ad Hoc Advisory Group
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1
Appoint one to two members to serve as an ad hoc advisory group in
assisting the selection of a State Lobbyist to represent the interests of the
City of Temecula in Sacramento.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Roberts moved to appoint Councilman Stone and
Councilman Naggar to serve on this particular ad hoc advisory group. Mayor
Comerchero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
No comments.
CITY A'I'I'ORNEY'S REPORT
City Attorney Thorson reported that the City Council provided direction with respect to
the existing litigation; and with respect to the matter involving the County, advised that
the City Council provided authorization to file litigation against the County of Riverside
and Overland Associates, noting that the vote had been unanimous.
ADJOURNMENT
At 11:38 P.M., Mayor Comerchero formally adjourned the City Council meeting to
Tuesday, August 28, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
.?
[SEAL]
R;\Minutes\081401 23