Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout100301 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 3, 2001 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, October 3, 2001, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Chairman Chiniaeff. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Also Present: PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 A.qenda RECOMMENDATION: Commissioners Guerriero, Olhasso, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff. Commissioner Mathewson. Director of Planning Ubnoske, Assistant City Attorney Curley, Senior Planner Hazen, Assistant Planner Preisendanz,. Project Planner McCoy, and Minute Clerk Hansen. 2 1.1 Approve the Agenda of October 3, 2001. Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of August 15, 2001. R:LPLANCOMIvi~vI1NUTES~2001 \10-3 -01 .doc MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-2. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who was absent. COMMISSION BUSINESS Appointment of a Commissioner to the Rancho Highlands Ad Hoc Committee. Director of Planning Ubnoske provided an overview of the Rancho Highlands item which includes the recommendation to change the General Plan designation on a parcel (located proximate to the Embassy Suites use) from Open space to Highway Tourist Commercial; and noted that the recommendation was denied by the Planning Commission, and subsequently forwarded to the City Council (and discussed during Closed Session) where it was determined that a committee should be formed to further review this matter, requesting that the Planning Commission appoint one of its members to serve in this capacity. After discussion ensued, Chairman Chiniaeff volunteered to serve on the Rancho Highlands Ad Hoc Committee. COMMISSION BUSINESS Plannin(~ Application No. PA01-0465 (Findinq of Substantial Conformance) to modify the exterior desitin of the previously approved church buildinq (Planninq Application PA99-0124) Curtis H. Lyon/Christ the Vine Lutheran Church - Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION 3.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA01-0465 pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 3.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 001-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 0t-0465, A FINDING OF SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE FOR THE MODIFICATION OF THE DESIGN OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CHURCH BUILDING (PLANNING APPLICATION PA99-0124) LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD AND WEST OF THE PROPOSED PARK SITE WITHIN PLANNING AREA 2 OF THE CAMPOS VERDES SPECIFIC PLAN KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 921-009-075. Presenting the staff report (of record), Assistant Planner Preisendanz noted the discrepancies in the current plan verses the project approved by the Planning Commission which was attributed (by the applicant) to drafting errors; via overheads, relayed that the primary difference between the two plans was regarding the front elevation which fronts North General Kearney, highlighting the variances in the roof design, the relocation of doors, and the deletion of windows; and relayed staff's recommendation for approval. For Commissioner Guerriero, Assistant Planner Preisendanz noted that the overall height of the building has not changed. Commissioner Telesio concurred that these modifications constitute a substantial change, noting the elimination of 14 windows, a door, and a major change in the roof design; and relayed that while he preferred the previous plan, he would not deny the project's approval. Mr. Curtis Lyon, Pastor of the Christ the Vine Lutheran Church, representing the applicant, reiterated, for Commissioner Guerriero, that there has been no change in the height of the steeple; and provided additional information regarding the previous drafting errors, noting that ultimately that plan was not feasible, nor did it represent the original design intent. For Mr. Lyon, Assistant Planner Preisendanz specified the windows which have been deleted from the original plan. In response to Commissioner Telesio, Assistant City Attorney Curley provided additional information regarding staff's review of projects during the approval process, and prior to construction. On a side note, Commissioner OIhasso relayed gratitude to Pastor Lyon, noting that the churches in the community were a great asset to the City. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to close the public hearing; and to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who abstained. Planninq Application No. PA01-0404 (Findinq of Substantial Conformance) to modify the previously approved exterior colors and awninq design of the existinq Palomar Villaqe Shoppina Center- Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION 4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA01-0404 pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act. 4.2 Adopt a Resolution Entitled: R:PlanComm/minut es~100301 3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 200t-036 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 0'1-0404, A FINDING OF SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EXTERIOR COLORS AND AWNING DESIGN OF THE EXISTING PALOMAR SHOPPING CENTER (PLOT PLAN NO. I0739), PARCEL 4, 9, '10, t'1, '15 AND '16 OF PARCEL MAP 23472, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 92'1-700-004, 009, 0'10, 011,015 AND 0'16. Relaying that this project was originally approved by the County in 1988, Assistant Planner Preisendanz presented the staff report (via agenda material); clarified that the surrounding residents expressed concern regarding the colors the applicant proposed to utilize to repaint the building, advising that subsequently the applicant came to staff to address these concerns; relayed that after meeting with staff the applicant has revised the plan (as represented in the supplemental agenda material); noted that the applicant was additionally proposing to replace various awnings at the center with metal awnings; provided the rationale for bringing this item before the Planning Commission, relaying the variation in the proposed color scheme in comparison to the County's approval, and the residents' expressed concern; and for Chairman Chiniaeff, confirmed that both the applicant and staff were in agreement with the proposed colors. For Commissioner Olhasso, Assistant Planner Preisendanz confirmed that the awnings on the Longs and Albertson's uses would remain blue, and that the replaced awnings would be green, clarifying that this particular proposal did not include the outlining pads. Noting the plethora of colors utilized at this center, Commissioner Telesio enumerated the two colors of awnings, and the 3-4 variant colors for the trim, advising that it appeared that this project would not meet the standards of the Design Guidelines. In response to Chairman Chiniaeff, Assistant Planner Preisendanz noted that the applicant was not present at this time. For Commissioner Guerriero, Assistant Planner Preisendanz provided additional information regarding the discussions between staff and the applicant, noting the changes implemented from the original repainting design plan. It was noted that the applicant's representatives arrived to the meeting at 6:22 P.M. Advising that she was not pleased with the proposal, Commissioner Olhasso specified the gold color included in the color scheme, the blue awning that was worn and dilapidated, and the numerous colors proposed for the paint application; and opined that the plan should be redesigned. Mr. Jeff Jonsson, representing the applicant, noted that the rationale for leaving the blue awnings on the Albertson's and Longs use was due to the consistency with other uses (i.e,, the Shell gas station), which the applicant did not have control over; for Commissioner Olhasso, noted that there were three primary colors in the repainting design plan which were hues that blended with one another, relaying that the beige-gold color (Tannery) was added to break up the monotony of color and would solely be applied on the two perimeter structures (i.e., Peony's and Wearabouts), the Silver Lining Cards and Gifts use, and the three towers in the food court, which would be painted the Tannery color with an added gold color; specified that the gray color proposed for the wood was consistent with the existing color; and relayed that the "Next Hunter" color was proposed to tie in with the landscape, the tabletops, the furniture, and the existing umbrellas. For Mr. Jonsson, Commissioner Guerdero clarified that his main concern was regarding the mustard/gold color, in particular the "Cockatoo Gold" color, Chairman Chiniaeff and Commissioner Telesio concurring, and adding that they were also concerned with the proposed "Tannery" color. Commissioner Telesio advised that due to the small size of the center, the paint application should be more uniform, and that the number of colors utilized should be decreased. In response to the Commission's concerns, Mr. Jonsson questioned whether the following plan would be acceptable: the Peony's, the Wearabouts, and the Silver Lining Cards and Gifts buildings would be painted color "A" 0Nhite Trade), the three main towers would be painted color "B" (Hedgehog), advising that colors "E" (Tannery), and "G" (Cockatoo Gold) would be eliminated; and for Chairman Chiniaeff, confirmed that the existing blue awnings could be either repainted or buffed, noting that the ladder would be relocated to improve the visual appearance. MOTION: Chairman Chiniaeff moved to close the public hearing; and to approve staffs recommendation, subject to the following revisions: Modify- The colors "E" (Tannery), and "G" (Cockatoo Gold) would be deleted from the color scheme. The Peony's, the Wearabouts, and the Silver Lining Cards and Gifts buildings would be painted Color "A" (White Trade). The three main towers would be painted Color "B" (Hedgehog). The existing blue awnings at the Albertson's and Longs' uses would be either repainted or buffed. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who was absent. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS A. Relaying that he had addressed this issue with Code Enforcement, Commissioner Guerdero queried whether it was staff's recommendation that he R:PlanComm/minute~lO0301 5 follow up or that staff address the matter of the large containers being stacked behind the Power Center. With respect to traffic safety, Commissioner Guerriero advised that the monument sign placed on Margarita Road creates negative site distance impacts in particular while exiting the Hometown Buffet use, additionally noting that the added leasing signs have compounded the problem. In response, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that she would forward the matter to Deputy Director of Public Works Parks. Commissioner Olhasso queried if the Planning Commission could be updated regarding the funding designated for constructing the medians in the areas now controlled with traffic cones, in particular on Highway 79. For Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the City Council item regarding consideration to place City Hall in the Old Town area had been continued. Commissioner Olhasso recommended that Art in Public P/aces be considered in the General Plan process, in particular regarding Development Impact Fees. For Commissioner OIhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that discussions regarding Senior Apartment Housing units in the Target Center would begin in the middle of November. Commissioner Olhasso recommended that staff address the Cai Spas use cleaning up the site. For Chairman Chiniaeff, Senior Planner Hazen noted that after staff investigation it was revealed that there was no legitimate reason for the vehicles parking along Solana Way, advising that the matter has been turned over to Code Enforcement. Chairman Chiniaeff recommended that the matter be addressed by the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, recommending that the curbs be painted red. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that a Development Code Amendment, providing language to clarify what constitutes a substantial conformance, would be brought to the Planning Commission. Assistant City Attorney Curley and Director of Planning Ubnoske updated the Planning Commission regarding the Harveston Project. In response, Commissioner Telesio noted that the individuals seeking signatures for the petition to place this project on the ballot did not have support material for review even when the additional data was requested. R:PlanComm/minutes/lCO301 6 ADJOURNMENT At 6:52 P.M. Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next re(lular meetinR to be held on Wednesday, October t7, 200'1 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairman - ~Eeb~oske, Director of Planning