HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-050 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 95-50
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0061
(MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERMIT CABARET
THEATERS (2), SALOONS (2), AN OPERA HOUSE, TV/RADIO
STATION, VIRTUAL REALITY THEATERS (2), A QUICK DRAW AREA,
ADMINISTRATIVE AND TICKET OFFICES IN AN AREA GENERALLY
BOUNDED BY SIXTH STREET TO THE NORTH, FIRST STREET TO
THE SOUTH, MURRIETA CREEK TO THE WEST AND INTERSTATE
15 TO THE EAST
WHEREAS, TZBG filed Planning Application No. 94-0061 in accordance with the City
of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which
the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 94-0061 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 94-0061 on
May 15, 1995, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued Planning Application No. 94-0061 at
their May 15, 1995 meeting to June 5, 1995;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commission considered all facts
relating to Planning Application No. 94-0061 and recommended approval to the City Council;
WHEREAS, the City Council considered Planning Application No. 94-0061 on June 13,
1995, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had
an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findings. The City Council, in recommending approval of Planning
Application No. 94-0061 makes the following findings:
1. The proposed Master Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the City's General
Plan, the development code, and applicable specific plans. Ordinance No. 94-19 was adopted
by the City Council to permit Master Conditional Use permits within the City of Temecula.
Reaoa\95-50 I
Planning Application No. 94-0061 will facilitate development in Old Town Temecula and
implement The Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. This is an extension of Land Use Element
Goal No. 6 which called for "A Plan for Old Town that enhances the economic viability,
preserves historic structures, addresses parking and public improvement needs, and establishes
design standards to enhance and maintain the character and economic viability of Old Town."
Further, upon approval of the Master CUP, and submittal of subsequent development plans at
specific sites, the plans will be reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board for consistency
with the Old Town Specific Plan.
2. The proposed Master Conditional Use Permit is consistent with a signed
memorandum of understanding or development agreement between the City and a private party.
A Memorandum of Understanding was executed between the City of Temecula and TZBG on
January 31, 1995. The Master Conditional Use Permit is consistent with this Memorandum of
Understanding. No development agreement is applicable to this finding.
3. The proposed Master Conditional Use Permit will result in a tangible and
substantial public benefit. The project proposes cabaret theaters (2), saloons (2), an opera
house, TV/radio station, virtual reality theaters (2), a quick draw area, administrative and ticket
offices. These developments will enhance and maintain the character and economic viability of
Old Town, by attracting patrons and consumers to the areas.
4. The proposed Master Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the nature,
condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and that the proposed
conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, and structures. Upon
approval of the Master CUP, and submittal of subsequent development plans at specific sites,
the plans will be reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board for consistency with the Old
Town Temecula Specific Plan. This will insure that the project will be consistent with the
nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and that the
proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, and structures.
5. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping,
and other development features prescribed in the zoning ordinance. Upon approval of the
Master CUP, and submittal of subsequent development plans at specific sites, the plans will be
reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board for consistency with the Old Town Temecula
Specific Plan. This will insure that the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape
to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas,
landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Old Town Temecula Specific
Plan.
6. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan
and the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. The Final Environmental Impact Report has been
certified and the impacts of the project as laid out have been mitigated.
As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, Planning Application No. 94-
0061 as proposed, conforms to the logical development of its proposed
Resos\95-50 2
site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the
surrounding property.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The City of Temecula City Council hereby
certifies FEIR (Planning Application No. 95-0031), adopts Findings of Fact and Statements of
Overriding Consideration and approves of the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Old Town
Entertainment Project which includes the Master Conditional Use Permit and subsequent
development proposals within the area.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves
Planning Application No. 94-0061 to permit cabaret theaters (2), saloons (2), an opera house,
TV/radio station, virtual reality theaters (2), a quick draw area, administrative and ticket offices,
and a town square/plaza in an area generally bounded by Sixth Street to the north, First Street
to the South, Murrieta Creek to the west and Interstate 15 to the east subject to the following
conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of June, 1995.
ATI'EST:
June S. MC, C
[SEAL]
Rcaos\95-50 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 13th day of June,
1995 by the following vote of the Council:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks, Roberts
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED:
1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
Ju e~~r~k, CMi, Cit~~rk
Reso8\95-50 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA94-0061 - Master Conditional Use Permit
Project Description: To locate cabaret theaters (2), saloons (2), an opera house,
TV/radio station, virtual reality theaters (2), a quick draw area, administrative and
ticket offices in the Tourist Retail Core Designation of the Old Town Temecula
Specific Plan.
Approval Date: June 13, 1995
Expiration Date: June 13, 1998
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The use hereby permitted by the approval of Planning Application No. PA94-0061 is for
the siting of cabaret theaters (2), saloons (2), an opera house, TV/radio station, virtual
reality theaters (2), a quick draw area, administrative and ticket offices in the Tourist
Retail Core Designation of the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan.
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and
any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents
from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside,
void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Master Conditional
Use Permit which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period
and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et sea_., including but
not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City shall promptly notify the
developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within this time period.
City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the City fail to
either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter be
responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Developer shah be
entitled to select Counsel, reasonably acceptable to City, to conduct such defense
which Counsel shah be authorized to represent City and Developer. City shah not
reject any reasonable settlement, including, without limitation, not proceeding with
the project. If City does reject a settlement reasonably acceptable to Developer, City
may continue to defend at its cost (Added at City Council hearing on June 13, 1995).
Resos\95-50 5
This approval shall be used shall be null and void three (3) years after approval unless
the permittee has commenced the conditionally approved use(s). Commencement of the
use(s) shall mean the beginning of substantial construction of the authorized use(s), which
construction must thereafter be pursued diligenfiy to completion, or in the case of an
existing building, the actual occupancy of the building or land under the terms of the
approved permit.
e
Prior to the expiration of the Master Conditional Use Permit, the permittee may request
an extension of time in which to use the permit. For good cause, two (2) twelve (12)
month time extensions may be granted by the City Council. The City Council may add
additional conditions or requirements to the conditions of approval when approving a
time extension. The request for an extension of time shall be made on the forms and in
the manner prescribed by the Director of Planning.
This Master Conditional Use Permit may not be transferred or assigned without the
specific written approval of the City Council.
This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with The Old
Town Specific Plan.
The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures identified within Planning Application No. 95-0031 (Old Town Redevelopment
Project Environmental Impact Report).
This Master Conditional Use Permit may be revoked upon the findings and procedures
contained in Section 18.31 of Ordinance No. 348.
The boundary of the Master Conditional Use Permit and specific uses shall conform with
Exhibit A, as approved with Planning Application No. PA94-0061, or as amended by
these conditions.
10.
Subsequent development permits shall be consistent with the conditions identified in this
approved Master Conditional Use Permit.
11.
During all construction periods within and/or adjacent to sensitive wildlife habitat
(Chamise Chaparral, Coastal Sage Scrub, or Riparian/Wetland), the applicant shall
provide temporary fencing at the boundary between areas to be disturbed/graded and
areas to remain undisturbed. In areas where fencing is not possible, the applicant shall
survey and mark construction area boundaries and shall retain a qualified biologist with
authority to stop construction activity when it construction extends beyond these
boundaries. Any disturbances outside of designated areas of disturbance shall be restored
to comparable habitat quality of the adjacent undisturbed habitat.
12.
Construction activities at the Western Bypass crossing over Murrieta Creek shall be
limited to daylight hours until the bridge is completed, except in an emergency as defined
by the City.
Re~os\95-50 6
13.
Transit facilities shall be installed at centralized locations within Old Town and the
hotel/arena complex. The City shall work with regional transit agencies to provide
service to these locations in the future when such Wansit service becomes available.
14.
The applicant shall provide a pedestrian linkage from the Westside Specific Plan to
the Old Town Entertainment Project area. This linkage shall be consistent with the
streetscape designs in the Old Town Specific Plan and will address such items as
lighting, landscaping and possible security and sound walls to mitigate impacts to
surrounding residential uses. This linkage plan shall be submitted with the fh-st
development plan (Added at the Planning Commition hearing on June 5, 1995).
Prior to the Issuance of a Grading Permit for Each Subsequent Development Proposal
15.
The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that
ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development).
Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation
Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall
pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
16.
To prevent the loss of any Southwestern Pond Tuffies during construction, the applicant
shall retain a qualified biologist to collect any tuffies within the Western Bypass bridge
crossing construction area. The biologist shall also oversee installation of barriers to
prevent tuffies from occupying the construction area during active construction in the
channel. The applicant shall fund maintenance of the tuffies, if required, until they can
be returned to Murrieta Creek following construction.
17.
To offset the loss of 64.6 acres of occupied Gnatcatcher habitat in the Chamise Chaparral
and Coastal Sage Scrub plant communities within the project area the applicant shall
implement one of the following measures: a) Acquire 97 acres of high quality
Gnatcatcher habitat (1.5:1 ratio based on discussions with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Staff)
and transfer ownership of the land or open space easements (which prevent any future
use other than open space) and management responsibility for the property to the
Riverside County Parks Department or other agent acceptable to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service and Department of Fish and Game. This habitat shall be purchased
within the Santa Rosa Plateau/Santa Margarita River Potential Reserve area as identified
within the Riverside County "Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan", or at a
location acceptable to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Fish and
Game. An endowment of $50,000 shall be provided for use by the designated
management agency to enhance wildlife carrying capacity of the 97 acres set aside as
mitigation for this project; or b) pay fees as determined through negotiations with the U.
S. Fish and Wildlife Service and State Department of Fish and Game to an agent
authorized by these two agencies for purchase of land-banked compensation habitat.
Rcao,\95-50 7
18.
To offset the loss of up to one acre of Riparian/Wetland habitat in Murrieta Creek, the
applicant shall develop two acres of Riparian/Wetland habitat or habitat improvements
in the immediate area of the Western Bypass bridge crossing, or at an alternative location
acceptable to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Department of Fish and Game.
The requirements of this measure can be superseded by any alternative mitigation or
compensation developed through acquisition of a Corps 404 Permit or Department of
Fish and Game 1601/1603 Agreement. The plans for the two acres of Riparian/Wetland
enhancement shall be reviewed and approved by the City, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, and Department of Fish and Game prior to implementation.
19.
A silt fence or alternative acceptable to the City and San Diego Regional Water Quality
Control Board shall be installed downstream of construction activities in Murrieta Creek
to control siltation downstream of the construction site. The performance standard used
for this measure shall be sufficient control to prevent downstream siltation that can cause
degradation of the aquatic/riparian/wetland habitat.
20.
The applicant shall install fences or other measures to control human access from the
Western Bypass to the west., cxcept in Area D of thc Wcstsidc Specific Plan. The City
will requirc aeccss controls around thc boundary of Arca D and thc adjaecnt ~vildlifc
habitat whcn this arca dcvclopa. (Deleted at the Planning Commition hearing on June
5, 1995).
21.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit for Each Subsequent Development Proposal
22.
Three (3) copies of a Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing
fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown.
23.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of an Occupancy Permit for Each Subsequent Development Proposal
24.
An application for signage or a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Director.
25. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view.
26.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation,
and shading plans.
Rcaos\95-50 8
27.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a
condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free
of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in
good working order.
28.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at
a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each
entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly
and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
3 square feet in size.
29.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to
guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed with the
Department of Planning.
30.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
31.
Conditions of approval will be applied to the project on subsequent development
proposals.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
No specific development activities shall be permitted with this Master CUP application unless
or until a site specific development permit or plot plan has been reviewed by the Department of
Public Works. The specific land uses of the Master CLIP as defined in the Old Town
Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) result in mitigation measures as
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Pursuant to the submittal of subsequent
development applications associated with the Master CLIP, ensuing traffic reports, parking
Re,os\95-50 9
studies, and public facilities' analyses addressing project specific and cumulative impacts
identifying implementation responsibilities and the timing of necessary improvements shall be
provided. These studies shall be subject to review and individual projects shall be conditioned
accordingly. Public rights-of-way shall be reserved as deemed necessary by the Department of
Public Works pursuant to the Cities' adopted General Plan, the Old Town Redevelopment
Project Environmental Impact Report, and subsequent project specific traffic studies.
The Department of Public Works shall review and clear all subsequent development applications
associated with the Master CUP prior to issuance of "Subsequent Development Permits" as
identified in Item f. of Section 2. of Ordinance No. 94-19.
Subsequent development applications shall all be subject to the following requirements:
32.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable
to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance
of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
33. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
34.
The Developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as
established, per lot/unit/acre, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts.
35.
This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction Plan"
in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01.
36.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be
paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or
final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date
on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof,
the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of
which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this
Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee.
The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The
Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess
of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By
execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the provisions
of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or
the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this
project; provided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness
of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
Resos\95-50 10
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
As a condition of approval for any subsequent development application associated with
this Specific Plan, the Developer must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip
Reduction Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01.
Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development
as approved by the Department of Public Works. Access to the sites shall be reviewed
by the Department of Public Works at the time of submittal of individual development
applications.
All street sections shall correspond with Typical Roadway Cross Sections and
requirements of the Circulation Element of City's General Plan, City ordinances,
standards, or as subsequently recommended in the Old Town Redevelopment Project
Traffic Studies.
All intersection intervals shall comply with City and Caltrans standards and requirements.
Accesses proposed from Western Bypass Corridor, First Street, and Vincent Moraga
Drive to the site are conditional upon Director of Public Work's approval.
The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location and
number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside Transportation
Agency (RTA). If required additional fights-of-way dedications associated with bus bays
shall be provided by the Developer.
Necessary improvements have been/will be conditioned based on mitigation measures
identified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report and
associated studies and as required by public/utility agencies. Any substantive changes to
phasing of the development must be approved by the Planning Commission through a
phasing application. A phasing of the development considered to be minor or in
substantial conformance with the construction phasing plan approved with the adoption
of the Master CUP, as determined by the Department of Public Works and the Planning
Director, may be approved administratively through applicable City procedures. Prior
to the issuance of occupancy permits within any phase, all on and offsite improvements
as referred to in the Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Report and
associated studies and public/utility agencies requirements must be constructed and/or
bonded as required by the Department of Public Works.
Pursuant to submittal of subsequent development applications associated with the Master
CUP and/or substantive revisions to the proposed phasing plan, ensuing traffic reports,
parking studies, and public facilities' analyses determining respective project specific and
cumulative impacts identifying implementation responsibilities and the timing of
necessary improvements shall be provided. These studies shall be subject to review and
the individual project shall be conditioned accordingly and required right-of-way be
reserved as decmed neccssary by the Dcpartmcnt of Public Works {Deleted at the
Planning Comm[qsion hearing June 5, 1995).
R¢sos\95-50 11
44.
In compliance with the Site Traffic Impact Analysis of the Old Town Redevelopment
Project - Phase I, as prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., dated October 28,
1994, the following infrastructure improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of
any occupancy, or as decmed neecssary by thc Dcpartmcnt of Public Works (Deleted at
the Planning Commition hearing June 5, 1995).
Page 40 of the study states that "at the Rancho California Road/Interstate 15 (I-
15) north ramps, on the westbound intersection approach, widen and/or restripe
Rancho California Road to provide one through lane aligned with the (eventual)
separate left turn lane at the 1-15 south on-ramp, one through lane, one optional
through/right turn lane, and one right turn lane. In order to accommodate two
lanes of right turning traffic onto the 1-15 north on-ramp, widening and/or
restriping may be required just north of Rancho California Road; these two lanes
should merge into one lane, however, prior to intersecting the mainline of 1-15
north". Similar widening and/or restriping shah be provided on the
eastbound intersection approach at the Rancho California Road/Interstate 15
south ramp (Added at the Planning Commition hearing on June 5, 1995).
Page 19 of the study states that "at the State Route 79 south (SR79s)/I-15
interchange, the 1-15 north ramp and south ramp intersections with SR79s will be
signalized, (and widened to provide additional through and turn lanes)". The
feasibility of ultimate southbound loop improvements and connection with
Western Bypass Corridor and acquisition/reimbursement agreement for work
in excess of project impact shall be explored. The ramp improvements are
currently identified in the Engineefts Report for Assessment District 159 and
scheduled to begin construction by the end of 1995. (Added at the Planning
Commi~slon hearing on June 5, 1995).
Page 43 of the study states that "the Western Bypass Corridor (88 feet full width
right-of-way) shall be constructed from the 1-15/SR79s interchange to intersect
the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive (including the bridge
crossing over Murrieta Creek, median and parkway improvements, sidewalks,
and street lights). Between the 1-15/SR79s interchange and the new bridge over
Murrieta Creek, a four lane, divided cross section shall be constructed, thereby
providing two through lanes per direction plus a separate left turn lane at major
intersections. West of Murrieta Creek to Vincent Moraga Drive, the street section
may be reduced to a two lane, divided cross, thereby providing one through lane
per direction plus a two way left turn lane and/or a separate left turn lane at
major intersections".
Page 43 of the study states that "Vincent Moraga Drive (78 feet full width right-
of-way) shall be extended south of its current intersection (existing terminus) with
Ridge Park Drive to intersect the Western Bypass (refer to the above item). A
two lane, divided cross section shall be constructed, thereby providing one
through lane per direction plus a two way left turn lane/or a separate left turn
lane at major intersections (including parkway improvements and sidewalks)".
The existing segment of Vincent Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road shall
R¢sos\95-50 12
be restriped to accommodate this same street section.
Page 43 of the study states that "In relation to the above item, Ridge Park Drive
shall form (be reconstructed to form) a "T" intersection with Vincent Moraga
Drive".
Page 43 of the study indicates that "the Front Street/Santiago Road/First Street
intersection shall be redesigned to provide a four legged intersection via the
removal of the existing First Street east leg of this intersection. The existing First
Street east leg shall be "relocated" and shall operate as a "T" intersection with
Front Street between Santiago Road and Second Street".
Page 43 of the study states that "Front Street (78 feet full width right-of-way)
from the Front Street/Santiago Road/First Street intersection shall be extended
west to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. A four lane , undivided, cross
section, thereby providing two through lanes per direction (including a bridge
crossing over Murrieta Creek, sidewalk and parkway improvements, and street
lights); however, at major intersections, a separate left turn lane shall also be
provided".
Page 43 of the study states that "a traffic signal warrant analysis (utilizing criteria
established by the State of California Department of Transportation) indicates the
Front Street/Western Bypass Corridor intersection shall be signalized. It is
recommended, therefore, that traffic volumes be monitored at this location to
determine the precise scheduling of this installation. Moreover, when constructed
this traffic signal shall be interconnected with the two traffic signals proposed at
the 1-15/SR79s interchange".
Page 44 of the study states that "(once the First Street bridge is operational) the
existing Main Street bridge over Murrieta Creek may be restricted to pedestrian
and local transit circulation".
Traffic signals shall be installed at the intersection of Vincent Moraga Drive
and Rancho California Road. Interconnection shall be provided from this
intersection through the signalized intersection of Diaz and Rancho California
Roads to the intersection of Front Street and Rancho California Road (Added
at the Planning Commission hearing on June 5, 1995).
45.
Sufficient parking and a local transit system shall be provided pursuant to the attached
alternative scenarios to satisfy the parking demands of the project in compliance with the
Old Town Redevelopment Project Parking Study, prepared by Robert Kahn, John Kain
& Associates, Inc., dated February 20, 1995.
46.
Certain project related parking and circulation improvements will be implemented with
the future development of Master CUP as identified in the Old Town Redevelopment
Project Parking Study, prepared by Robert Khan, John Kain & Associates, Inc., dated
February 20, 1995, the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis
Resos\95-50 13
of the Old Town Redevelopment Project, prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.,
dated October 28, 1994, and the General Plan Build Out Traffic Impact Study of the Old
Town Redevelopment Project, prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, dated March 1995.
Pursuant to submittal of subsequent development applications associated with the
Westside Specific Plan, ensuing traffic reports, parking studies, and public facilities'
analyses determining respective project specific and cumulative impacts identifying
implementation responsibilities and the timing of necessary improvements shall be
provided. These studies shall be subject to review and the individual project shall be
conditioned accordingly and required right-of-way be reserved as deemed necessary by
the Department of Public Works.
The mitigations options to bc eonsidcred (Deleted at the Planning Commi,qsion hearing
on June 5, 1995) are as follows:
Page 35 of the CMP analysis specifies the Extension of Pujol Street southerly to
intersect Western Bypass Corridor.
Page 35 of the CMP analysis specifies improvements to the 1-15/Rancho
California Road interchange. The improvements may include "a "loop" on ramp
accommodating eastbound to northbound movements".
Page 4 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends "widening of
the Rancho California Road bridge (on the south side) to accommodate an
additional eastbound through lane".
Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends "construction
of a southbound loop on ramp in the northwest quadrant of the 1-15/Rancho
California Road interchange".
Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends "construction
of a new southbound off ramp at Santiago Road" (as an alternative).
Page 5 of the General Plan Build Out traffic analysis recommends improvements
to the 1-15/SR79s interchange. The improvements may include widening SR79s
to accommodate additional vehicular turning movements and/or an southbound
loop off ramp in the southwest quadrant of the interchange.
Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that "a realignment of Diaz Road north of
Rancho California Road and the realignment of Pujol Street/Felix Valdez Street
to make Diaz Road/Felix Valdez Street/Pujol Street a continuous north-south
route may be implemented". Alternatively, a realignment of Diaz Road north of
Rancho California Road to align with Vincent Moraga Drive shall be studied.
Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that "Sixth Street may be extended westerly
to intersect Pujol Street. This would require a bridge crossing over Murrieta
Creek".
Resos\95-50 14
Provision of adequately sized parking lots in compliance with the Old Town
Specific Plan at locations specified in the Old Town Redevelopment Project
Parking Study to satisfy the parking demands.
Page 35 of the CMP analysis states that "some form of people-mover system
(local transit system) shall be provided along Main Street between Front Street
(on the east) and the Arena (on the west). This could include a theme related
shuttle system, funicular transit system, horse-drawn carts, or an actual pedestrian
people-mover. In addition, as necessary, provision of some sort of shuttle system
during periods of peak activity to transport patrons to/from parking facilities
potentially located on the periphery of the project site".
47.
A signing program shall be developed on 1-15 which directs Project traffic to the SR79s
interchange.
48.
A Trip Reduction Plan shall be developed which includes local/internal traffic circulation
and parking requirements of the Project. This plan shall address both vehicular and
pedestrian circulation, including the Project's proposed people-mover and shuttle systems.
49.
Supplemental onsite focused traffic studies shall be required to analyze access, stacking,
and local circulation issues associated with more definitive development applications shall
be submitted prior to subsequent approvals.
50.
The Developer(s) of future plot plan(s) is (are) responsible to dedicate all necessary right-
of-way for the construction of the infrastructure improvements within and/or adjacent to
the Master CUP.
OTHER AGENCIES
51.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions
set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated July 19, 1994,
a copy of which is attached.
52.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood
Control District's transmittal dated August 15, 1994, a copy of which is attached.
53.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Fire Department's transmittal dated April 15, 1995, a copy of which is attached.
54.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal
Water District's transmittal dated July 22, 1994, a copy of which is attached.
55.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated July 18, 1994, a copy of which is attached.
R¢sos\95-50 15
56.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the State of California -
Department of Transportation's transmittal dated July 25, 1994, a copy of which is
attached.
57.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit
Agency's transmittal dated July 26, 1994, a copy of which is attached.
I have read, understand and accept the above Conditions of Approval.
Applicant Name
Resos\95-50 16