Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout080499 PC Minutes PlanCommlminutes1080499 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 4, 1999 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday August 4, 1999, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Fahey. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Fahey, *Mathewson, Naggar, Webster, and Chairman Guerriero. Absent: None. Also Present: Planning Manager Ubnoske, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, Attorney Curley, Senior Planner Fagan, Associate Planner Donahoe, Assistant Planner Anders, Project Planner DeGange, Project Planner Griffin, Project Planner Thornsley, and Minute Clerk Hansen. *(Commissioner Mathewson arrived at 6:18 P.M.) PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of A.qenda MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to postpone consideration of Agenda Item No. 4 until after consideration of Agenda Item No. 5 in order for Commissioner Mathewson to be present for the hearing of Agenda Item No. 4. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who was absent. PlanComm/minutes/080499 2. Approval of Minutes-June 30,1999 and July 7, 1999 Commissioner Naggar indicated that the June 30, 1999 minutes should be corrected on page 5, after the heading Commissioner Naggar relayed the following additional comments, to add an additional bullet, worded as follows: Recommended that the project incorporate senior housing in the high density area. MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the minutes, as amended. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Fahey and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who was absent and Commissioner Webster who abstained. It was noted that the minutes of July 7, 1999 should be amended on page 8, Section Commissioner Reports, paragraph B, replacing the word west with the word east in order to correctly reflect the east side of the freeway. MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the minutes, as amended. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Mathewson who was absent. PUBLIC HEARINGS 3. Planning Application No. PA98-0353 (Revisions to Previously Approved Development Plan) Request to design, construct and operate a 17,598 square foot office/industrial building (previously approved at 23,098 square feet). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. Relaying that this particular project was previously approved by the Planning Commission on October 21, 1998, Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (per agenda material); highlighted the significant changes the developer made to the overall site design, noting the increase in the total landscaped area, and the modified color scheme; and relayed that this particular project would require a Minor Exception Permit to allow the reduction of one (1) parking space. Mr. David Whitfield, representing the applicant, for Commissioner Webster, provided the rationale for the modified color scheme. For future projects, Commissioner Webster would like the record to reflect his recommendation to maintain darker color schemes for buildings in this particular area due to the visual impact. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public hearing; and adopt Resolution No. 99-022 approving the proposed revisions to Planning Application No. PA98-0353 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval. PlanComm/minutes1080499 RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE PROPOSED REVISIONS TO PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A '17,600 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING, AND A MINOR EXCEPTION PERMIT FOR THE REDUCTION OF ONE (1) PARKING SPACE WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING, AND LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL CONTAINING A '1.08 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD, NORTHWEST OF BOSTIK COURT, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-370-006. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected approval with the exception Commissioner Mathewson who was absent. 4. Planning Application No. PA99-0229 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) This Agenda Item was heard out of order, see page 4. 5. Planning Application No. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit). Request to build and operate a 3,800 square foot drive-through restaurant (Burger King). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. It was noted that Commissioner Mathewson arrived at 6:18 P.M. By way of color renderings and overheads, Project Planner Thornsley presented the staff report (of record), highlighting location, access, amhitecture which would be consistent with the mall, landscaping inclusive of the buffer between the project and the main roadways; noted that staff has conditioned the project to add additional berming in the landscape plan to aid in shielding the glare of headlights from cars; for Chairman Guerriero, relayed that the aforementioned berming would be approximately three feet in height; for Commissioner Webster, noted that the landscaping within the transportation easement along Winchester Road would encompass approximately fifteen percent (15%) of the total landscape plan; for Commissioner Naggar, clarified the provision of access, specifically, regarding adequate stacking provisions; for Commissioner Mathewson, provided additional information regarding the parking requirements; and further specified the landscape plan. Mr. Brian Price, representing the applicant, for Commissioner Webster, confirmed that the split-face block would be a natural red color, and would not be painted. Commissioner Webster relayed his comments, as follows: a) with respect to the Condition of Approval on the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the original Center's Specific Plan, noted that he had recommended that staff prepare an informational PlanCommlminutes/080499 presentation for the Planning Commission at a future point in time regarding the updated Mitigation Monitoring Program in order to specifically address Transportation Demand Management Mitigation Measures, and to verify that the specified provisions are being addressed, b) recommended that for future projects staff distinguish the landscape easement percent portion of proposed projects which could be subject to being eliminated, and c) commended the architect for his design to enclose the play area, recommending that at a future point in time the Design Guidelines be modified to recommend that all play areas on similar uses be enclosed. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public hearing, and approve staff's recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 99-024 approving Planning Application No. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; and adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99~ 0077 (Conditional Use Permit) pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99- 0077 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 3,888 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON ONE ACRE AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH SERVICES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD BETVVEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD, KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NO. 9t0-320-00t AND LOT A OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS PA99-0007 The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At this time the meeting continued back to Agenda Item No. 4. 4. Plannin¢l Al~Dlication No. PA99-0229 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) Request to operate a Large Family Daycare Home for up to 14 children, Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. By way of overhead maps, Associate Planner Donahoe presented the staff report (per agenda material); relayed that due to the written request for a public hearing and the amount of opposition relayed to staff the issue had been brought before the Planning Commission; reviewed the State Law with respect to Large Family Daycare facilities within residential areas; noted that this particular proposal meets the Design Standards within the Development Code; noted that a petition inclusive of nine signatures had been submitted to staff from the adjacent neighbors; relayed the concerns of community PlanCommlminutes1080499 members, as follows: adequate supervision, noise, traffic, and parking; and provided additional information regarding the cited concerns. Associate Planner Donahoe addressed the concerns of the Commission, as follows: > For Commissioner Naggar, clarified the Conditional Use Permit and the associated revoking process. > For Commissioner Webster, confirmed that within the Specific Plan for Paloma Del Sol there were two land use areas designated for daycare facilities; noted that the State does not maintain requirements for minimum size play areas for this particular type of use; noted that the City is in the process of developing an Ordinance to detail the specificities regarding the attainment of a Large Family Daycare Minor Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in accordance with the State requirements. For Commissioner Mathewson, clarified the State permitting process for Large Family Daycare facilities within residential areas; relayed that the State Fire Marshall inspects these type of facilities at the time the formal request for a Large Family Daycare License is made; provided additional information regarding permitted levels of noise; and clarified the 300-foot distance separation requirement between Daycare uses. Attorney Curley clarified the Noise Standards within the Large Family Daycare Statute setforth in State Law; for Commissioner Naggar and Chairman Guerriero, provided additional information regarding the process of revoking a Conditional Use Permit based on a substantial disruption of the community and the associated evidence required; clarified the State's intent with regard to daycare facilities within residential areas; for Commissioner Fahey, provided additional information regarding defensible grounds for denial, noting that if the proposal meets the specified Code requirements that a denial would not be defensible; clarified the City's associated permitting process which is in accordance with State Law; for Commissioner Mathewson, provided additional information regarding permitted noise levels; provided additional information regarding the Local Governing Agencies' ability to revoke the permit; and confirmed for Commissioner Naggar, that the 300-foot distance parameter separating permitted daycare facilities could be modified. Ms. Sherry Evens, the applicant, provided information regarding the proposed facility and her intent to cooperate with the concerned neighbors; for Commissioner Webster, confirmed that the garage of the residence would be utilized to meet the requirements of Condition of Approval (COA) No. 10, regarding the applicant maintaining two enclosed parking spaces for vehicle parking; for Chairman Guerriero, clarified that her own three children would be included in the total number of 14 permitted children; and for Commissioner Fahey, noted that the neighboring area generates approximately 50% of her daycare clientele. The following individuals spoke in opposition of the proposed daycare use: c~ Mr. Mark Mush 31731 Corte Avalos c~ Ms. Susan Bittner 43035 Camino Casillas c~ Ms. Margaret Whiston 43166 Camino Casillas PlanComm/minutes1080499 Ms. Rosetta Guernsey 31977 Corte Avalina The above-mentioned individuals expressed their concerns, as follows: Noise · -' The potential for additional Daycare Centers in the area Traffic Parking Inadequate space at the residence for 14 children Children in the street In response to Commissioner Naggar's querying for a recommended distance separation space between daycare uses (currently setforth as a 300-foot parameter), Mr. Mush relayed that he would rather see the number of children limited to six or seven. For Ms. Whiston, Commissioner Naggar recommended contacting the Association regarding parking requirements. In response to community concern, Ms. Evens, confirmed that due to the large number of children in the neighborhood that there were numerous children in the street, clarifying that her daycare children would be in the house, the backyard, or supervised for an outdoor activity (i.e., bike riding.) While concurring with the concerns of the community, Commissioner Fahey advised that the Conditions of Approval (COA's) would adequately condition the project; and noted that due to the aforementioned State Law, the Commission does not have the ability to limit this particular use beyond the COA's. Commissioner Mathewson reiterated the regulations that the State utilized to govern this particular use, limiting the power of the local governing agencies; and addressed each of the issues of concern raised by the community members and the associated constraints of the Commission. Concurring with the previously expressed comments of the Commission, Commissioner Naggar specifically stated that he, too, would not desire to reside next door to a Large Daycare facility; relayed that he had made a surprise visit to the residence of Ms. Evens, noting that she graciously let him in, advising that the residence was in remarkable good condition; advised that Ms. Evens make a diligent effort to not inconvenience her neighbors with respect to the impacts of the Daycare; recommended that for future uses the issue of a 300-foot separation distance be investigated, relaying that he was of the opinion that the distance need to be extended; recommended adding a COA to prohibit double-parking via Attorney Curley's recommendation regarding the language of the Condition; and relayed that since the use meets all the State Standards setforth he would support the proposal. PlanCommlmin utes/080499 Commissioner Webster commended Ms. Evens for her diligent efforts associated with the care of children; relayed concern with respect to the aforementioned designated land use areas not being solely utilized for daycare uses; with respect to the CUP, relayed that he could not concur with Finding No. 2 (denoted on page 4 of the staff report) regarding compatibility of this project with the adjacent uses, with Finding No. 3, regarding this use being adequate in size and shape, and with Finding No. 4, regarding this use not being detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the community; relayed that with respect to Large Daycare facilities he was of the opinion that there would be compatibility and health, safety and welfare issues beyond the provisions provided by State Law, specifically with respect to traffic issues, and the size of this particular residence and lot. Chairman Guerriero applauded Ms. Evens for her efforts to address the need for daycare of children in Temecula; advised that the City could further mitigate various issues of concern for the future, as follows: consideration of installing white curbing on the associated street, and amending the distance between uses; advised that this particular use is more desirable and beneficial to the community than the latchkey situations where there is no supervision for children; and noted that parking issues could be addressed with law enforcement if the issues of concern were substantiated. MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to close the public hearing; accept staff's recommendation to approve the project; adopt Resolution No. 99-025 approving Planning Application No. PA99-0229 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0229 (MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERMIT THE OPERATION OF A LARGE FAMILY DAY CARE HOME LOCATED AT 43047 CAMINO CASlLLAS, SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD, WEST OF VIA RAMI, WITHIN THE PALOMA DEL SOLE SPECIFIC PLAN AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 955-203-005 Add- A Condition restricting parking, specifically pick-ups and drop-offs to the street frontage directly in front of the residence and the driveway The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson and voice vote reflected approval with the exception Commissioner Webster who voted n_go. At 7:38 P.M. a shod recess was taken, and the meeting reconvened at 7:44 P.M. 5. Planning Application No. PA99-0077 (Conditional Use Permit). This Agenda Item was heard out of order, see page 3. PlanCommlminutes1080499 6. Planning Application No. PA99-0168 (Development Plan) Request to design, construct and operate two 6,000 square foot commercial speculative buildings on a 0.99-acre parcel. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. Via maps and overheads, Project Planner DeGange presented the staff report (of record); highlighted location, access, architecture (noting the articulation), and landscaping (noting the screening of the central portion of the drive aisle form the right- of-way); noted the revisions to the original site, architectural, and landscape plans due to staff recommendation; relayed that the applicant has closed the rear access driveway; for Commissioner Naggar, provided additional information regarding the elevation located on Winchester Road; and clarified the landscape screening of the roll-up doors. Mr. Peter Minegar, and Mr. Chuck McLaughlin, representing the applicant, were available for Commission questions. For Commissioner Webster, Mr. Minegard provided the rationale for the elimination of the rear driveway, and confirmed that originally the plan had been to construct one building on the site. Commissioner Naggar relayed that he was pleased with the elimination of the driveway. Commissioner Webster, echoed by Commissioner Fahey, recommended the addition of architectural improvements due to the zoning of this particular project, suggesting the addition of a cornice element along the top of the buildings. For Commissioner Mathewson, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that the signage for this particular project would come back to staff for approval. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public hearing; adopt Resolution No. 99-026 approving Planning Application No. PA99-0168 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; and adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0168 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, and subject to the additional Condition of Approval, as follows: RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99- 0168, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF TWO 6,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS (TOTALING 12,000 SQUARE FEET) ON 0.99 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH (27626 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH) KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-270-063 PlanCommlmin utes/080499 Add- . A Condition requiring the applicant to add additional architectural enhancement on the buildings The motion was seconded by Commissioner Webster and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 7. Planning Application No. PA99-0115 (Development Plan) Request to design, construct and operate a t3,400 square foot industrial building on a 0.97-acre parcel. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. By way of maps and overheads, Project Planner DeGange presented a detailed overview of the project (via agenda material); and noted that the 30% landscape plan would exceed the 20% percent requirement, specifying the location of the berming and planters for this particular site and the adjacent planter which would be located on the adjacent property in order to screen the elevation from that use. For Commissioner Fahey, Mr. Vince Maganuco, representing the applicant, provided additional information regarding the elevation which would be on the property line, reiterating the location of the eight-foot planter located on the adjacent property. Due to the location of the project on the property line, Commissioner Fahey initially recommended reducing the size of the building in order to install landscaping on this particular elevation at this site. In response to Commissioner Fahey's comments, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks clarified the benefit of maintaining the planter, as proposed, in order to have one sole party be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaping for that particular area. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public hearing; adopt Resolution No. 99-027 approving Planning Application No. PA99-0115 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-01t5, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 13,400 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON 0.97 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COLT COURT, 200 FEET SOUTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-360-005 PlanComm/minutes/080499 Commissioner Webster seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 8. Planning Application No. PA99-0'1'16 (Development Plan) Request to construct a 22,000 square foot industrial building on a 1.28 acre parcel zoned for "Light Industrial" development. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. Via overheads, Project Planner Griffin presented the staff report (per agenda material); specified the enhanced articulation features; and for Commissioner Fahey, relayed the landscape plan with respect to the zero lot line elevation. Commissioner Mathewson requested that staff further investigate the existing parking spaces provided on this particular project, noting that his figures did not compute to a fulfillment of the parking requirements per the Development Code. For Commissioner Webster, Mr. Vince Magunuco, representing the applicant, confirmed that there was public notification located on site that had blown down due to wind conditions; and relayed that the applicant would be willing to add two additional bicycle- parking spaces if that was the desire of the Commission. Commissioner Webster, echoed by Commissioner Naggar, recommended that additional trees be added on the east property line along the parking area. MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to close the public hearing; adopt Resolution No. 99-029 approving Planning Application No. PA99-0116 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, and subject to the attached modifications; to adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0116 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. RESOLUTION NO. PC 99-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0116, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 22,200 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON 1.28 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLT COURT SOUTH OF WINCHESTER AND KNOWN AS PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 28471-1 Add- , That staff further investigate the parking spaces proposed to assure that the project meets the requirements of the Development Code, and subsequently e-mail the Commissioners with the associated information 10 PlanCommlminutes1080499 · That an additional Condition be added requiring additional trees on the east property line along the parking area The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT A. Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed the issues related to applicants involved in current proposed projects that are not in compliance with the City's Standards, and the refusal of the applicants to accept staff's recommendation to implement revisions; noted the applicant's request to submit their project, as proposed, to the Planning Commission; and invited the Commission to provide direction as to the process of having staff deal with the aforementioned nonconforming projects. Attorney Curley provided information regarding the constraints associated with the Brown Act, regarding Commission contact by applicants; and relayed alternate methods of dealing with the aforementioned issues. After additional discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission to have staff bring forward to the Planning Commission the aforementioned projects for their approval or denial. B. Informing the Commission of the current activities of staff, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that staff is in the process of hiring an additional planner. C. For Commissioner Guerriero, Planning Manager Ubnoske provided clarification regarding the planning and approval process with respect to speculative building projects. D. Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed the request by the Roripaugh Ranch applicant to hold a Special Meeting with the Planning Commission, noting that the associated documents would be provided to the Commission two weeks in advance of the meeting for review; and relayed, for Chairman Guerriero, that a Noise Study had been completed with respect to the Roripaugh Ranch Project. COMMISSIONER REPORTS A. For Commissioner Mathewson, Attorney Curley provided additional information regarding staff's findings denoted in the staff reports. In response to Commissioner Mathewson's request, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that staff could provide the rationale for the findings of staff in the staff report. B. With respect to Commissioner Mathewson's comments regarding the grading project on Ynez Road and the associated dirt being left on the roadway, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks confirmed that there are dust control regulations. 11 PlanComm/minutes1080499 For Commissioner Mathewson, Chairman Guerriero provided additional information regarding the citing of trucks that are not in compliance with the dust control regulations. C. For Commissioner Webster, Senior Planner Fagan relayed that the Wolf Valley Workshop would be presented to the Planning Commission in September. D. For Commissioner Naggar, Planning Manager Ubnoske relayed that staff would further investigate the 300-foot distance requirement with respect to proximity of Daycare facilities, as discussed during consideration of Agenda Item No. 4. E. For Chairman Guerriero, Planning Manager Ubnoske provided additional information regarding the City's inability to regulate issues of concern with respect to the Portofino Project. ADJOURNMENT At 9:05 P.M. Chairman Guerriero formally adjourned this meeting to Wednesday, August 18, 1999 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. R6~ Gu~r{ero, Chairman Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager 12 Note: Resolution No. PC99-028 was assigned to Agenda Item No.4 of the February 3, 1999 meeting. Coversheet for PC080499minutes ~g;;;: