HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-080 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 02-80
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE
ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE
INITIAL STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR PA01-0522 AND PA00-
0470, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET EAST OF
JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST FOR
APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY DESCRIBED
AS LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF TRACT NO. 15211;
ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-060-
001 THRU -005 & 959-070-001 THRU -006.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. Rancho Community Church, filed Planning Application No. 01-0522 (Zone
Change) and Planning Application No. 00-0470, Conditional Use
' Permit/Development Plan, for the property consisting of approximately 54 acres
generally located on north side of State Highway 79 South beginning 480 feet
east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for approximately 4,000 feet,
for property described as Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211;
also known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-060-001 thru -005 & 959-070-
003 thru -006 ("Project").
B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review
was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality
Act.
C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public
hearing on July 31, 2002, to consider the applications for the Project and
environmental review at which time all person interested in the Project had the
opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on those matters.
D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public
hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-22 recommending approval of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Zone
Change, and Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan for the Project.
E. On September 24, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the
Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters.
R:/Resos 2002/02-80
Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and
' Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project and all comments received regarding the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds, determines and declares
that:
A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA') and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential
environmental effects of the proposed Project. Based upon the findings
contained in that Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial
evidence that the project could have a significant effect on the environment and a
Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. A copy of the Initial Study,
Negative Declaration, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan are attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of
the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law and
copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at
the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, Ca. 92589.
C. The City Council reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received
regarding the Negative Declaration. The Project and the Negative Declaration
were discussed at regularly scheduled public meetings of the Commission held
on July 31, 2002.
' D. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA.
E. There is no substantial evidence that the Project, as conditioned, will have a
significant effect on the environment.
F. The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and
analysis of the City Council.
G. The Mitigation Monitoring Plan set forth in the Mitigated Negative Declaration has
been prepared in accordance with law.
Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Mitigated
Negative Declaration for the Project and approves the Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Project.
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a Notice of
Determination describing the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Program by the City Council in the Office of the County Clerk for the county of
Riverside in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution.
R:/Resos 2002/02-80
I
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24'" day of September, 2002
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 02-80 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of September, 2002, by the following vote:
AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Comerchero, Pratt, Stone
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Naggar, Roberts
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos 2002/02-80
3
I EXHIBIT A
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
7
Environmental Checklist
Project Title
-
Planned Development Overlay - 5 (Planning Application No. PA01-
0522) Rancho Community Church and School (PA00-0470)
Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula,. CA 92589-9033
Contact Person and Phone Number
Thomas Thornsley, Associate Planner (909) 694-6400
Project Location
Located on the north side of State Highway 79 South beginning 480
feet east of Jedidiah Smith Road and continuing east for 3,400 feet.
(Assessor's Parcel Numbers 950-080-001 thru -004 & 950-090-003
thru -006)
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
Rancho Community Church, 29141 Vallejo Ave., Temecula, CA
92592
General Plan Designation
Professional Office (PO) with a Z-1 overlay
Zoning
Professional Office (PO)
Description of Project
Planning Applications Nos. PA01-0522 a Zone Change to establish a
Planned Development Overlay proposal to modify the land use
standards to allow for a mix of uses on 55 acres including a church,
school and office/commercial uses.
PA00-0470 is a Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan for a
church and school campus to accommodate 1,800 students on a 39-
acre portion of the 55 acre site. The overall proposal will include
146,826 square feet of religious and 136,771 square feet of school
facilities; a two story, 44,406 square foot, office building; and one
four level parking structure (with a 918 spaces totaling 380,023
square feet). The site will be developed in phases beginning with a
1,500 seat, 26,927 square foot, interim sanctuary with assembly
room and a nursery; a two story 22,203 square foot administration
building, 17 modular classroom buildings, a 9,695 square foot
preschool, a 300 seat, 5,856 square foot chapel, two field
house/residence buildings, and lighted athletic fields. Future phases
include permanent first through twelfth grade classroom facilities, a
gymnasium, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship center and the
parking structure.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
North: Very Low Density Residential (houses & vacant lots)
East: Professional Office (vacant land)
South: PDO-4 (vacant land) & Medium/Low Density Residential
(houses)
West: Very Low Density Residential (houses)
Other public agencies whose approval
None.
is required
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
1
I
r
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
1. Land Use Planning
X
10. Noise
2. Population and Housing
11. Public Services
X
3. Geologic and Soils
12. Utilities and Service Systems
X
4. Water
X
13. Aesthetics
X
5. Air Quality
X
14. Cultural Resources
X
6. Trans ortation/Circulation
15. Recreation
7. Biological Resources
16. Agricultural Resources
8. Energy and Mineral Resources
X
17' Mandatory Findings of Significance
9. Hazards
None
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared
X
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially
significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially impacts (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION
pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project, nothin further is required.
Signature
Thomas Thornsley
Printed name
4//n2
Associate Planner
Title
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PD0-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
2
1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Physically divide an established community?
X
b.
Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or
X
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental
effect?
C.
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
X
natural community conservation plan?
Comments:
1.a. The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community. The
project site has been intended for development of office uses, with a zoning overlay to establish the
development standards, as a buffer between State Route 79 South and the single-family residences to
the north and west. The property to the east is vacant and is also intended for professional office use
and subject to a similar zoning overlay. The south side of the street has two areas; the eastern area
contains single-family homes, and the western area, known as PDO-4 is intended for development of
400 apartment units and approximately 125,000 square feet of commercial/retail development. The
' development of this site, as proposed, will be consistent with the intended use of the property and
compatible with the surrounding properties. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
1.b. The project will not conflict with applicable General Plan designation, environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The project is consistent with the City's General
Plan land use designation of Professional Office (PO) with a Zoning 1 (Z-1) overlay as well as the
zoning of Professional Office (PO). Impacts from all General Plan land use designations were analyzed
in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan. Implementation of the proposed PDO-5
and the development of Rancho Community Church does not appear to have the potential to conflict
with any agency plans or policies that have been adopted in order to avoid or mitigate an environmental
effect. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the analysis contained in
the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency. Mitigation measures approved
with the EIR, such as development impact fees, will be applied to this project where necessary.
Further, all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are also being given the opportunity to comment
on this project, and it is anticipated that they will make the appropriate comments as to how this project
relates to their specific environmental plans or policies. The project site has been previously graded
and used for agricultural purposes and services were previously stubbed out to these properties. With
the collection of Development Impact Fees and the mitigation measure applied in subsequent sections,
there will be less than significant impacts on adopted environmental plans or policies.
1.c. The proposed project will not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan. In the past the site has been graded, farmed, and continuously grubbed
for weed abatement. This site is not within any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
' community conservation plan. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
3
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
X
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b.
Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
X
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
C.
Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
X
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
r
Comments:
2.a. The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The proposed
PDO-5 and future development will eventually result in the development of a church and school to
serve current residents and the portion of the site proposed for other uses will cause some people to
relocate to, or within Temecula to be closer to their place of employment. However, due to nature of the
development of this property, it will not induce substantial growth beyond what is projected in the City's
General Plan. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
' 2.b.c. The subject property is currently vacant and zoned for office development and therefore, the project will
neither displace housing nor people necessitating the construction of replacement housing. No such
impacts will occur as a result of this project.
3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project?
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and supporting information sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Expose people or structures to potential substantial
X
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involvin :
i)
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the
X
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
Source 1 Figure 7-1, Page 7-6)
ii
Strong seismic round shaking?
X
iii)
Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
X
Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
iv
Landslides? Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8
X
b.
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
X
C.
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or
X
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
i-'
I
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
4
d.
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B
X
of the Uniform Building Code (1998), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e.
Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of
X
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
Comments
3.a. The Wildomar earthquake fault is plotted through this property on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. Because of the fault known to cross the property, the owner had a Fault
Location Confirmation Investigation carried out by PETRA Geotechnical, Inc. and the results compiled
in a report dated April 13, 2001. Based on the field evidence the Wildomar fault crosses the project
site, as previously documented, and the fault offsets Holocene alluvium and is therefore, considered to
be active (fault rupture in the last 11,000 years). As part of the project site's development the PETRA
report recommend that "additional geologic mapping should be preformed during grading to further
evaluate any fault related information which may become available due to additional exposures.
The project has been designed to keep the placement of structures outside of the 100 foot fault zone
(50 feet each side of the fault). A detailed description of the City's geology and soils is contained in
Chapter 4.1 of the City's General Plan Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR). According to the
GPEIR, the City of Temecula is in Groundshaking Zone II, which will experience moderate to intense
groundshaking in the event of a major regional earthquake. Geologic mitigation measure 5 is identified
in Section 4.1.3 of the GPEIR and it is deemed adequate to reduce potential groundshaking impacts to
a level of non-significance. Any potential significant impacts will be mitigated through building
construction, which is consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards. Further, the project will be
conditioned to provide soil reports prior to grading and recommendations contained in this report are
followed during construction. After mitigation measures are performed, no impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
111-1 Site development with be conducted in accordance with the Geotechnical/Geological Engineering
Study recommendations prepared by PETRA Geotechnical, Inc. April 13, 2001.
3.b. There should be limited erosion due the site being relatively flat. Development of the project site will
expose it to potential erosion and possibly downstream sedimentation. The General Plan requires
mitigation for projects to control erosion. Further, specific requirements have been established under
the statewide NPDES program that requires every project with ground disturbance greater than five
acres to implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction and over the
long-term. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are identified in the SWPPP to control erosion on a site
and any sedimentation generated by disturbing the site for development. Mitigation is required to
control potential erosion and sedimentation. To avoid wind born and water soil erosion, graded but
undeveloped area, those areas not proposed for development in the Phase I, will be required to be
hydro-seeded and supplied with temporary irrigation as required in the City's Development Code. The
following mitigation measure will be implemented.
III-2 The SWPPP prepared for this project will implement BMPs identified in the County's Drainage Area
Management Plan (DAMP). The required performance standard is to minimize erosion on the site in
accordance with DAMP BMPs and to contain all eroded sediment on the project site.
' 111-3 Upon completion of the initial mass grading and or precise grading, all areas not planned for
development during each build phase shall be hydro-seeded and supplied with temporary irrigation
as required in the City of Temecula's Development Code. Should any area within a developing
phase be left undeveloped for 3 months, it too shall be hydro-seeded and supplied with temporary
irrigation or sprayed with a nontoxic chemical stabilizer capable of preventing wind erosion.
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
5
3.c. There may be a potentially significant impact from seismic ground shaking, ground failure, soil erosion
or expansive soils. A review of the City's Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazards in the General Plan (Figure
7-2) indicates that the project site is located within a zone of potential subsidence or liquefaction.
Potentially significant impacts associated with the development of this site will be mitigated with the
implementation of Mitigation Measure III-1 at the time of grading and will be further mitigated during
building construction, which is consistent with engineered and Uniform Building Code standards. In
addition, preliminary soil reports will be submitted and reviewed as part of the application submittal and
recommendations contained in this report will be used to determine appropriate conditions of approval
prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. The conclusions and recommendations contained
in this report will be utilized in the development of this site, which will serve to mitigate any potentially
significant impacts from liquefaction. After Mitigation Measure III-1 is performed, no significant effects
are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.d. According to the Fault Location Confirmation Investigation carried out by PETRA Geotechnical, Inc.,
April 13, 2001, preliminary tests indicate that the shrink/swell of potential of onsite soils is considered
low. No change in the geotechnical recommendations is expected. Should subsequent soils reports,
required prior to development, indicate possible expansive soil conditions the report will require
improvements based on the report's findings prior to building permits being issued. There should be no
impacts from soil expansion.
3.e. Septic sewage disposal systems are not proposed for this project. The project will be required to hook
up to the existing public sewer system. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
Ill)
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Intonation Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Imp act
a.
Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
X
requirements?
b.
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
X
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been granted)?
C.
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d.
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result
in flooding on- or off-site?
e.
Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
X
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide :substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
I.
Otherwise substantial) degrade water quality?
X
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
6
g.
Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as
X
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h.
Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures
X
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i.
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
X
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j.
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
X
Comments:
4.a. The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project
and subsequent development will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be
exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level
less than significant.
4.b.f. The project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level. The project has no potential to adversely interfere with groundwater recharge.
The proposed project does not include any extraction of groundwater, so no adverse direct impact can
' result from implementing the proposed project. The GPEIR addresses water demand from
development in the City of Temecula, including 772 acres of medium density residential uses and 520
acres professional office uses. The GPEIR concludes that cumulative water demand within the City can
be met by the City's two purveyors without having a significant adverse impact on the environment,
including depletion of the areas groundwater supplies. The proposed development is consistent with
the General Plan designation for the property and thus is considered consistent with the GPEIR.
Therefore, the proposed project will not contribute to a significant cumulative, indirect adverse impact
on the area groundwater aquifers. The project will not have an affect on the quantity and quality of
ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals or through interception of an aquifer by
cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. Further,
construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have an impact on ground waters or aquifer
volume. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
4.c. The proposed project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, nor
alter the course of a stream or river. Erosion and siltation issues are addressed in previous discussions
under geology and hydrology. Therefore, the proposed project will not contribute to a significant
cumulative, indirect adverse impact.
4.d.e. Site development will require mitigation to prevent erosion and sedimentation run-off during
construction and after occupancy. This project will be required to prepare a SWPPP plan to mitigate
these conditions. Some changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of
surface runoff is expected whenever development occurs on previously permeable ground. Previously
permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape
' and driveways and would increase runoff as a result of the project. The grading and drainage of the
site will convey the entire flow unattenuated in channels and pipes to the southwest corner of the site.
From this point it is proposed that the flow will cross the southern portion of the neighboring lot (Lot 47)
in a new channel to a box culvert located at the northeast corner of Jedidiah Smith Road and SR-79.
With the installation of this drainage system as a mitigation measure the impacts will be less that
significant.
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.doc
7
IV-1 A new channel of appropriate design and capacity shall be constructed to convey the onsite flow to
the box culvert located at the northeast corner of Jedidiah Smith Road and SR-79 as approved by
the Public Works Department.
' 4.g.h. The project will have no impact on people or property to water related hazards such as flooding
because the project site is located outside of the 100-year floodway as identified in the City of
Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (Figure 7-3). No potential for exposure to
significant flood hazards will occur from developing the project site as proposed. Therefore, no impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
4.i. According to Figure 7-4 the project site is located within a dam inundation flood hazard area
downstream from Vail Lake. Rupture of the dam and release of flows could cause loss of life and
property. The Office of Emergency Services is responsible for reviewing population control and
evacuation procedures in areas designated as potential for loss of life in the event of a dam failure.
Dams are over-designed to minimize potential failures. Typically within a city where a potential for dam
inundation exists there are two measures implemented:
1. The City's Emergency Services agency develops and maintains dam failure evacuation plan.
2. The city prohibits critical and essential uses within the designated dam inundation areas.
The City has implemented a multi-hazard functional plan pursuant to the California Emergency
Services Act. The proposed project does not contain critical or essential facilities. No mitigation is
required.
4.j. Due to the project area's distance from the ocean and elevation, there is no potential for a tsunami.
' The project area is not located near a large surface water body and there is no potential for inundation
by seiche or mudflow.
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
X
air quality plan?
b.
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
X
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
C.
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
X
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors?
d.
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
X
concentrations?
e.
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
X
of people?
' Comments:
5.a. The project will not conflict with applicable air quality plans nor violate air quality or pollution standards.
The project proposes a variety of use with a school being the most intense use on a daily basis. The
school, church, and future development, are anticipated to be below the threshold for potentially
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
8
significant air quality impact established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District as
depicted in SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook (Source 3) page 6-10, Table 6.2. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
' 5.b.c. The greatest project-related air quality concern centers on the "new" vehicle trips (with emphasis on the
school) that will be generated with the completion of Phase I. According the California Air Resources
Board URB7G model analysis included in the Air Quality Impact Analysis, prepared by Giroux &
Associates, dated August 14, 2000, Phase I of the project will exceed SCAQMD thresholds for nitrous
oxide (Nox) by 4% while all other mobile source emissions will be below their respective significance
thresholds. With the completion of final Phase of the project, all pollutants will be below their
significance thresholds. However, Nox dropping to 99% will be the closest to creating a possibly
significant air quality impact. As stated in Giroux's Analysis, "Because of the small degree of 'excess'
at Phase I, minor emissions reductions associated with carpools, buses or bicycles accessing the site,
especially the school, would be able to reduce the mobile source emissions burden to less than
significant for the Phase I project" To offset the likelihood of mobile source emissions surpassing the
SCAQMD thresholds, Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures such as vanpools,
carpooling, bus service, etc. will be required as mitigation measures and conditions of approval for the
school project, in order to achieve the equivalent of no more than 1.6 vehicle trips per student. With
these mitigations in place this project's impact could be reduced to less-than-significant levels and
therefore, will not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected
air quality violation.
V-1 Rancho Community Church and School shall offset the likelihood of mobile source emissions
surpassing the SCAQMD thresholds through the implementation of Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) measures such as vanpools, carpooling, bus service, etc. will be required for the
school project, in order to achieve the equivalent of no more than 1.6 vehicle trips per student. A
' written carpooling program with implementation procedures shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for review and approval.
5.d. When the project develops, sensitive receptors will occupy the site (proposed school). The future
development of the project will create minor pollutants during the grading and construction phase of the
project emanating from fugitive dust and small quantities of construction equipment pollutants. These
impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant because the project will comply with
regional rules such as SCAQMD Rules 403 and 402. These rules are conditions on the grading permit.
The future church, school and commercial/office uses are not likely to generate significant volumes of
pollutants or create substantial pollutant concentrations that could harm sensitive receptors that will
occupy this site upon completion. Therefore, with the mitigation measures the impacts will be less than
significant.
V-2 The City will require contractors to apply water to the disturbed portions of the project site at least
four times per day. On days where wind speeds are sufficient to transport fugitive dust beyond the
working area boundary, the City will require contractors to increase watering to the point that
fugitive dust no longer leaves the property (typically a moisture content of 120/6), and/or the
contractor will terminate grading and loading operations.
V-3 All material stockpiles subject to wind erosion during construction activities that will not be utilized
within three days will be covered with plastic, an alternative cover deemed equivalent to plastic, or
sprayed with a nontoxic chemical stabilizer.
V-4 All vehicles on the construction site will travel at speeds less than 15 miles per hour. This will be
enforced by including this requirement in the construction contract between the developer and the
contracted construction company with penalty clauses for violation of this speed limit.
' V-5 The contractor will require all vehicles leaving the project site to use a wheel washer to remove dirt
that can be tracked onto adjacent roadways.
V-6 Where vehicles leave the construction site and enter adjacent public streets, the streets will be
swept daily or washed down at the end of the workday to remove soil tracked onto the paved
surface.
R:\P D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
9
V-7 The project will comply with regional rules such as SCAQMD Rules 403 and 402 which would assist
in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions. Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled
' with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in
the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. Rule 402 requires dust
suppression techniques to be implemented to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance offsite.
These dust suppression techniques are summarized below.
a. Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three months will
be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized in a manner
acceptable to the City.
b. All on-site roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically
stabilized.
C. All material transported off-site will be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to
prevent excessive amounts of dust.
d. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations will be
minimized at all times.
V-8 All engines will be properly operated and maintained. These measures will be enforced through the
monthly submission of certified mechanic's records.
V-9 All diesel-powered vehicles will be turned off when not in use for more than 30 minutes and gasoline
- powered equipment will be turned off when not in use for more than five minutes.
V-10 The construction contractor will utilize electric or natural gas powered equipment in lieu of gasoline
or diesel powered engines, where feasible and where economically competitive.
5.e. None of the proposed activities at the project site have a potential to generate significant odors or
create substantial odor concentrations that could affecting a substantial number of people. During the
development of the future for church, school and commercial/office uses, some objectionable odors
' may be produced during the grading and construction of buildings, however these impacts are
anticipated to be of short duration and are mitigated under 5.d. and should have a less than significant
impact.
6. TRANSPORTATION/rRAFFIC. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in
X
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections?
b.
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
X
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
C.
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
X
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safe risks?
d.
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
X
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e. g., farm equipment ?
e.
Result in inadequate emergency access?
X
f.
Result in inadequate parking capacity?
X
g.
Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
X
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks?
R:\P D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
10
Comments:
6.a.b. The project site is currently zoned as Professional Office, which is also the land use assumed in the
City's Circulation Element of the General Plan. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by
the traffic engineering firm of Linscott, Law and Greenspan, the proposed land uses within the
proposed project will generate considerably less daily and AM/PM peak hour traffic than the current
zoning.
Since SR-79S is currently improved to its ultimate 6-lane width, the existing improvements in
conjunction with some mitigation measures by the project should be able to adequately accommodate
the traffic generated by the project. Mitigation measures for the project include installation of traffic
signals on SR-79S, at the two (2) major full access driveways. In addition, the California Department of
Transportation (CalTrans) has required additional improvements including a raised median island along
the entire property frontage in order to physically restrict the left-turn movements at the uncontrolled
driveways once the project site is operational.
Although the Traffic Impact Analysis for the project indicates that the signalized access points to the
site operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS), some delays could be expected due to the peaking
characteristic of school related pedestrian and vehicular traffic at the build-out of the project. In order to
minimize these delays, the applicant will be required to stagger the start time of the elementary, middle
and high schools within the project. The project will also provide an adequate link to the adjacent
property to the east for future connection to a roadway other than SR-79S to lessen. the impacts to this
highway by providing an alternate access to the site for local residents.
It should also be noted that according to the Traffic Impact Study, the intersections of SR-79S at 1-15
northbound and southbound ramps, La Paz Road, Pala Road and Margarita Road will operate at an
' unacceptable level of service at the build-out of the project and with cumulative impacts from several
other approved projects in the area. The consultant has established a fair share percentage
contribution towards improvement of the impacted intersections as a mitigation measure for the project.
The identified improvements should achieve a LOS "D" or better at these intersections.
VI-1 Traffic signals shall be installed at the two (2) major full access driveways/access points onto SR-
79S. Signals shall be installed at each access point prior to the first building occupancy or at such
time that the access is open as a public access.
VI-2 At the time of development of this property the developer shall comply with the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) requirements regarding raised median Island
improvements, to physically restrict the left-turn movements at the uncontrolled driveways along
SR-79. The extent of these improvements shall be made in accordance with the requirement
imposed by Caltrans.
VI-3 Prior to occupancy of the first classrooms, the school operator shall establish and operate the
school with staggered start times for the elementary, middle and high schools within the project
until such time that an alternative access not linked to SR-79 South is provided.
VI-4 A fair share monetary percentage contribution towards the improvement of the impacted
intersections outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis shall be made at the time of Development and
prior to occupancy. The contribution shall be based upon the fair share impact of the percentages
outlined in Table 13 of Linscott, Lay & Greenspan's Traffic Impact Analysis, May 17, 2002.
VI-6 The project will also provide an adequate link, and if necessary, a recorded reciprocal access
agreement, to the adjacent properties to the east for future connection to a roadway other than SR-
79S to lessen the impacts to this highway by providing an alternate access to the site for local
residents.
VI-6 All proposed driveway openings to Highway 79 South will be restricted to Right In/Right out unless
otherwise designated and approved by the City and CalTrans for full turning movement.
R:\P D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church 1`130-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
11
VI-7 Reciprocal ingress and egress easement and reciprocal parking agreement shall be recorded across
all existing and future lots.
6.c. Neither the project or future development of this property will result in a change in air traffic patterns,
including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety
risks. This site is not within the French Valley Airport's flight overlay district and therefore will have no
impact on the project.
6.d. The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed to current
City standards for access to SR-79 and the onsite circulation, as designed, does not propose any
hazards. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.e. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or inadequate access to nearby uses. The
project is designed to current City standards and has adequate emergency access. The project does
not interfere with access to nearby uses and will allow through access to all development along SR-79.
No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.f. The proposed church and school project are proposing adequate parking for their needs. Any future
development will be designed to comply with the parking standard found in the City's Development
Code. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
f
6.g. The project has been requested by RTA to provide a bus bay to be used as a transit stop. Parking
spaces will are proposed for motorcycles and bicycles during project review. The proposed school will
be required to provide additional bicycle spaces to meet the higher needs of students. No conflict or
adverse impact to adopted alternative transportation policies, plans, or programs are forecast to occur
from implementing the proposed project. With conditions and compliance with the development
standards for this and future projects the impact will be less than significant.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
X
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b.
Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
X
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
C.
Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected
X
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d.
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
X
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nurse sites?
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.dw
12
n
e.
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
x
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f.
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat
x
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Comments
7.a. A General Biological Assessment prepared by Principe and Associates, dated October 26, 1999
indicated that the, "previous grading has removed all topographic features and irregularities, and
continuous discing and agricultural uses have removed the majority of native vegetation and habitat."
The entire 53 acre site is flat-lying, long and narrow and no longer possesses natural surface and
biological characteristics. Due to the nature of the site limited wildlife is present. With no evidence of
significant biological resources, the site has no habitat to protect and thus no impact.
7.b. The site contains no riparian area although a few species of plant were found within the area of an old
earthen reservoir. The size and condition of the plants indicates that containment of water for habitat
has been limited and not formed by natural characteristics. Assessments were made to determine if
the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly was present or could inhabit the site. Based on the Principe Report, "it
appeared that the site was to disturbed to provide habitat for the butterfly. A staff member of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service who has regularly passed by this site for several years also supports this
conclusion. Therefore, no impacts can be associated with development of this site.
7.c. This site is dry and will have no impact on federally protected wetlands.
7.d. This site contains no waterways and is isolated from any open migratory wildlife corridors and therefore
will not interfere with the movement or nesting of wildlife, therefore there are no impacts.
7.e. The project will not result in an impact to locally designated species. Locally designated species are
protected in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan; however, they are not protected elsewhere in the
City. Since this project is not located in Old Town, and since there are no locally designated species on
site, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7.f. The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. The project will be
conditioned to comply with provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat
Conservation), which requires payment of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat fee. No impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
x
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b.
Result in the loss of availability of a locally important
x
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
13
Comments:
' 6.a.b. The project will not result in the loss of available, known mineral resources or in the loss of an available,
locally important mineral resource recovery site. The State Geologist has classified the City of
Temecula a classification of MRZ-3a, containing areas of sedimentary deposits, which have the
potential for supplying sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these
areas are determined as not containing deposits of significant economic value based upon available
data in reports prepared in accordance with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975.
No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Impact
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a.
Create a significant hazard to the public or the
X
environment through the routine transportation, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b.
Create a significant hazard to the public or the
X
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
C.
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
X
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d.
Be located on a site which is included on a list of
X
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e.
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f.
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
X
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g.
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
X
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h.
Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss,
X
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
9.a. The project is for the future development of church, school, and office buildings, on the lot created by
this subdivision, in an office area. The streets leading to this subdivision are not transportation routes
designated for commercial haulers who may be transporting hazardous materials. Because the
property and the surrounding area are and will be used for school, church and office lots or buildings,
RAP D M2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.doc
14
the future development should not include business that require the delivery of hazardous materials.
When a application is made for future development proposals, a Statement of Operation and a
Business Plan will be required that will be reviewed by the City's Fire Department so that they are not
likely to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
9.b. The project limits the use of the property to uses that would not typically be associated with the need to
use, store, or distribute hazardous materials. The request to develop a church and school would not
create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Future more,
with the development proposals of the undeveloped property, for office and commercial uses, will be
assessed during development application processing. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
9.c. The proposed development of the site will include a school which will places it within one-quarter mile
of future uses that will develop on this and the neighboring site to the east. The operation of
construction equipment and machinery during the grading of this site will emit some hazardous
emissions. However, these emissions should be of limited quantities over a short duration of time and
will occur before students occupy the site. During latter construction or during the operation of future
facilities or business, it is not anticipated that there will be uses that emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. A minimal amount of
hazardous emissions or material may be present during construction after the school is occupied and
are should not pose a threat to the occupants of the school. Therefore, less than significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.d. This project site is not nor is it located near a site, which is included on a list of hazardous materials
sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 that would create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.e.f. The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private
airstrip. No impact upon airport uses will result from this proposal.
9.g. The project will take access from maintained public streets and will therefore not impede emergency
response or evacuation plans. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.h. This project site is in an area surrounded by existing single family homes and is not adjacent to any
wildlands. No impact upon airport uses will result from this proposal.
10. NOISE. Would the project result in:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of
X
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b.
Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
X
roundborne vibration or roundborne noise levels?
C.
A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
X
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d.
A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
X
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.doc
15
n
without the project?
e.
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
f.
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
X
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
10.a. According to the Noise Impact Analysis for Rancho Community Church & Retail Project, by Giroux &
Associates, dated August 11, 2000, the primary source of noise on the project site is SH 79. Noise
levels to 65 decibels (dB) outside, and 45 dB inside, are within the acceptable range for the proposed
development as defined in the General Plans EIR. Typical construction methods with closed windows
are capable of reducing the noise level by 20 dB. The area build out noise will increase noise levels to
71.7 dB at 100 feet from SR-79 which means that any buildings proposed will require construction
methods capable of provide noise reduction to 45 dB at the interior. The worship center will be required
to achieve 25 dB of noise reduction along its fagade with SR-79. With standard constructions practices,
this can be achieved by limiting the number and type of windows on that side of the building. Because
the noise levels can be reduced through standard construction practices no mitigation is required and
the impact will be less than significant.
10.b. The uses conducted by the project are not activities that would expose persons to or generate
excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. Although there will be an increase in
' ground borne vibration and noise during grading and construction, these will be of a temporary and
short duration. Due to the limited nature of this exposure and by maintaining compliance with the City
Noise Ordinance there will be less than significant impacts.
10.c. Currently the site is vacant and any future development will bring potential noise producing sources
closer to the residential units along the northern boundary line. Because this property has always been
intended for development of office and commercial activities a certain level of noise can be expected.
The Noise Impact Analysis determines that the maximum project traffic noise impact versus no project
would be +1.4 dB, which is normally undetectable and therefore less than significant. However, over
time the cumulative impact plus the project will increase the noise level by +3.2 dB, which is considered
a significant change. Yet the ultimate noise level is 67.2 dB CNEL at 100 feet for SR-79. Since all
planned development along the highway is of a commercial nature and commercial use standards are
70-75 dB, the project traffic noise impacts are therefore less than significant both individually and
cumulatively.
10.d. Construction noise levels will be above background noise levels during daylight hours, but the City
General Plan requires construction noise mitigation by restricting construction activities to daylight
hours per the City's Code Section 8.32.020. To limit the other nuisance noises having the potential to
affect the surrounding residences the developer shall be required to place operation and staging areas
away from the homes.
With the development of the school, there are likely to be periodic changes in the noise levels produced
on site by student activities. However, these noise levels should be of short duration and at a
substantial distance (over 300 feet) to the existing residences and should be relatively unnoticed. To
assure that electronic amplifying devices that could be utilized in conjunction with the school and ball
fields do not create a nuisance, conditions will be include with the Conditional Use Permit limiting the
placement and broadcast direction of any devises to be installed.
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Communitl Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
16
X-1 During construction operations, trailers, and vehicle staging areas will be located as far as is
practicable from existing residential dwellings.
' X-2 The applicant will respond to any noise complaints received for this project by measuring noise
levels at the affected receptor. If the noise level exceeds an Ldn of 65 dBA exterior or an Ldn of 45
dBA interior at the receptor, the applicant will implement adequate measures to reduce noise levels
to the greatest extent feasible.
X-3 In addition to ensuring compliance with the City of Temecula General Plan, noise ordinances, and
other applicable regulations, the City will require noise standards specific to each business or
activity in the proposed development, that operates in the evening (7 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and night-
time hours (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.), as a component of a Conditional Use Permit. These noise
standards will ensure that noise levels at the nearest residences do not exceed 50 dBA at the
exterior wall facing the commercial area, or is below the background noise level.
X-4 Prior to the installation of external amplifying devices, the developer shall provide the City with a
sound study which assures that the projected sound levels will not be a nuisance to the existing
residential dwellings.
10.e-f. The project site is located five miles from the nearest airport or a private airstrip and has no potential to
be exposed to significant airport operation noise impacts.
11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered Government services in any of the following areas:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
X
impacts associates with the provisions of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any of the
public services?
b.
Fire protection?
X
C.
Police protection?
X
d.
Schools?
X
e.
Parks?
X
f.
Other public facilities?
X
Comments:
11.a.b.c.e.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire,
police, recreation or other public facilities. The project will incrementally increase the need for some
services. However, the project will contribute its fair share through City Development Impact Fees to
the maintenance or provision of services from these entities. Less than significant impacts are
anticipated.
' 11.d. The project itself does not create residences and will therefore, have no impact upon, or result in a
need for new or altered school facilities. Development of the parcels within the project will not cause
significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City. The cumulative effect from the project will
be mitigated through the payment of applicable School Fees at the time the parcels are developed. No
impacts are anticipated with the subdividing of this property.
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.doc
17
I i.f. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered public
facilities. The Rancho California Water District, in correspondence dated November 29, 2000, indicates
' that the project site is located within the boundaries of the District. Water and sewer service is available
upon completion of financial arrangements. The Riverside Department of Environmental Health, in
correspondence dated November 28, 2000, that indicates their Department has no objections, and
anticipates "Will Serve" letters will be provided to this project. Less than significant impacts are
anticipated.
I e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
X
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b.
Require or result in the construction of new water or
X
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
C.
Require or result in the construction of new storm water
X
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d.
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
X
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f.
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
X
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g.
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
X
regulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
12.a. The proposed project will deliver wastewater to the regional treatment wastewater reclamation plant in
Temecula. The facility is operated by the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) and it has capacity
to meet the demand from the proposed project within its authorized treatment capacity. This facility
operates within its waste discharge requirements. Therefore, the proposed project is not forecast to
cause a violation of wastewater treatment requirements, either directly or indirectly.
12.b. According to the General Plan EIR, adequate capacity exists within the EMWD water supply and
wastewater treatment systems to provide water and wastewater capacity for the proposed project. This
conclusion is also supported by urban water master plan adopted by the EMWD. Since the project is
' consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Moreover, the project will be conditioned to comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board
standards that will be monitored by the Department of Public Works. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Communih, Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
18
12.c. The site is flat and the future development will result in the need for new storm water drainage facilities.
The development of this project area will require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities on site that will connect to the existing system currently in place along Stare Route 79
' South. The design of the existing system downstream is sufficient to handle this project and will not
require the expansion of existing facilities as verified by the drainage report prepared by Jack P Norris,
dated October 27, 2000. The construction of this storm drain on this site will only disturb area
previously disturbed and will not cause significant environmental effects. Drainage fees are required by
the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to reimburse the county for the
Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated.
12.d. The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements.
Future development of the project area will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. While the
project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply
as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states: "implementation
of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." Since the
proposed project is generally consistent with the intent of the City's General Plan, no significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.e. Adequate wastewater treatment capacity has been identified by the EMWD to meet the City of
Temecula's current and immediate future demands, including the proposed project. See also 12.b
above.
12.f. According to the General Plan and the County Solid Waste Management Plan adequate landfill
disposal capacity exists within the regional landfills to meet current and future demands. Solid waste
mitigation measures identified in the General Plan EIR (Measures 2 and 3) must be implemented by all
' projects in the City to meet the City's source reduction requirements. Any potential impacts from solid
waste created by future development can be less than significant through participation in Source
Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.g By participating in the City's source reduction and recycling element, the proposed project will comply
with all statutes and regulations for management of solid waste. The proposed church, school, and
commercial projects do not pose any significant or unique management requirements. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
X
b.
Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
X
limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building
within a state scenic highway?
C.
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
X
ualit of the site and its surroundings?
d.
Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
X
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
19
Comments:
' 13.a. The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is not located in an area where
there is a scenic vista. The City does not have any designated scenic highways. No impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
13.b. No major rock outcroppings, substantial trees, or historic buildings exist on the project site. The project
site is not located on a scenic highway, but it will be required to meet design requirements along SH 79
to be consistent with existing development. No adverse environmental impact or mitigation is required.
13.c. The proposed project will be located adjacent to existing single-family units to the north of the project
site. Per the City's General Plan the project site is subject for a special overlay requiring the
development of the site to meet defined standards for the architecture compatible to the surrounding
residential development and that all structures be limited to no more than two stories. With the
preparation and adoption of standards in the Planned Development Overlay District, governing this site,
the General Plan's conditions will be meet. Based on the City's requirement to meet these design
guidelines, the proposed project has a less than significant potential to substantially degrade the
existing visual character of the site and surroundings, which is comprised of a combined
urban/suburban visual setting.
13.d. The project will require the development of parking lots that must be lit in accordance to City standards.
The lighting of these lots must also meet the County's Ordinance 655 requirements for no conflict with
the Mount Palomar Observatory. Due to proximity to residential uses, the project also has a potential to
create significant light and glare impacts onsite or impacting the surrounding area and uses from the
parking lots drive aisles and buildings.
If lighting of the ball fields is approved as part of this project the applicant will be required to submit light
studies that demonstrate that there will be no increase in the ambient light levels along adjacent
properties. To minimize the impacts of lighting on surrounding development, the following mitigation
measures will be implemented:
XIII-1 With the exception of site security lighting, all parking lot lighting and building lights within the
project area will be directed so that limited amounts of light or glare fall outside of the project site
boundary and that these lights be shut off at 11 p.m. In compliance with the County's Ordinance 655
requirements.
XIII-2 Lighting on the site shall be installed on independent operating systems so individual areas can be
controlled independently and shut off when not necessary for evening activities.
XIII-3 If ball field lights are approved light studies for the ball fields shall be submitted that demonstrate
that there will be no increase in the ambient light levels along adjacent properties. All ball field
lighting shall be directed so that minimal light or glare falls beyond the property boundary.
XIII-4 The days and hours of operation for the lighting of the ball fields will be made a part of the
Conditional Use Permit for the development of the church and school.
Implementation of these measures will ensure that no light or glare sensitive areas are exposed to
significant light and glare impacts, thereby reducing the impacts to a less than significant level.
R:\P D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.doc
20
r
l
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Im act
Mitigation
Incorporated
Significant
Imp am
No
Impact
a.
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
X
a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.5?
b.
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
X
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.5?
C.
Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
X
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d.
Disturb any human remains, including those interred
X
outside of formal cemeteries?
Comments:
14.a.b. A Phase I cultural resources survey of the project site was conducted by RMW Paleo Associates, Inc.
(July 2000). The results of the survey turned up historical and archaeological resources in the form of
an old irrigation channel and several artifacts on the western end of the project site, however due to
long term disturbance (plowing and discing) of this area, it is not known where the artifacts originated.
Therefore, the Phase I report recommends, "that this area be subjected to controlled destruction to
determine if a sub-surface artifactual deposit is present." The Eastern Information Center reports that
' 21 cultural resource studies have been conducted within 1/2 mile of this project site and four of those
sites have yielded a substantial number of artifacts. Eastern recommends the submission of a cultural
resource management report following guidelines for Archaeological Resources Management Reports,
that Phase II Testing be carried out, and that a professional archaeologist should monitor all
earthmoving during construction. Due to the likelihood of subsurface (buried) cultural resources on the
project site, a Phase II study will be required. If the Phase II report finds any subsurface cultural
resources, the reports recommendation must be carried out as mitigation for the preservation or
documentation of historical or archaeological resources pursuant to Section 1506.5. With mitigation
measures in place and the projects conditions of approval the potential impact should be reduced to a
level of insignificance.
XIV-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, Phase II Testing with controlled destruction, using as small
scraper to remove thin lifts of soil from the site, shall be preformed to determine if a sub-surface
artifact deposits are present. Upon completion of this testing a cultural resource management
report shall be prepared and filed with the California Historical Resource Information Center.
XIV-2 During initial grading and ground disturbance activities, a qualified archaeologist will be present and
will have the authority to stop and redirect ground disturbance activities to evaluate the significance
of any cultural resources exposed.
XIV-3 If any cultural resources are exposed during initial grading and ground disturbance activities, the
City will be contacted, and a qualified archaeologist will evaluate the resources. If discovered
resources merit long-term consideration, adequate funding will be provided to collect, curate and
report these resources in accordance with standard archaeological management requirements.
XIV-4 The qualified cultural resources monitor will issue a second DPR523 site recordation form for Site
CA-RIV-6499 after the completion of site monitoring. The report will include any additional site
features detected during grading.
14.c. The cultural resources survey of the project site conducted by RMW Paleo Associates, Inc. (July 2000)
indicates that the potential for buried paleontological resources has been high on neighboring sites and
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.doc
21
the potential exists on this project site. Due to the potential for such resources to occur on the property,
the following mitigation measure will be implemented:
XIV-5 During excavation and cutting activities, a qualified paleontological monitor will be present and will
have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any
paleontological resources exposed during the grading activity within the alignment. If
paleontological resources are encountered, adequate funding will be provided to collect, curate and
report on these resources to ensure the values Inherent in the resources are adequately
characterized and preserved.
14.d. As stated in RMW Paleo Associates, Inc., cultural
proximity to known archaeological remains and then
present. It is therefore recommend that a qualified
ground disturbing activities. In the unlikely event that
site, the mitigation measures presented in this section
potential impacts to a less than significant level.
resources survey, the project area is in close
is the possibility of additional remains being
archaeologist monitor the entire site during all
human remains are encountered on the project
in addition to the following measure will reduce
XIV-6 If any human remains are encountered during initial grading activities, all ground disturbing activities
in the vicinity of the discovery will be terminated immediately and the County Coroner's office will be
contacted to manage such remains.
15. RECREATION. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Would the project increase the use of existing
X
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b.
Does the project include recreational facilities or require
X
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Comments:
15.a.b. The project will
facilities, or aft
project.
have no impact on the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational
:ct existing recreational opportunities. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this
16. Agricultural Resources. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Into orated
Impact
Impact
a.
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
X
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b.
Conflict with the existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
X
Williamson Act contract?
RAP D 012001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.doc
22
n
r . Involve other changes in the existing environment which, I X
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
of farmland, to non-a ricultural use?
Comments:
16a.c. The project site is not currently in agricultural production and in the historic past has not ever formerly
been used for agricultural purposes. In addition this property is not considered prime or unique of
Farmland of statewide importance pursuant the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency or the City of Temecula's General Plan. Therefore, there are no impacts
related to this issue.
16b. The project site does not have an agricultural zoning designation by the City of Temecula, and the site
is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract. As a consequence there are no impacts related to this
issue.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Potentially
Potentially
Significant Unless
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
X
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b.
Does the project have impacts that are individually
X
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
rojects, and the effects of probable future projects?
C.
Does the project have environmental effects which will
X
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either direct) or indirectly?
Comments:
17.a. This site has been previously farmed, disc, and graded and is surrounded by single-family homes, a
future commercial and apartment development, and does not contain any viable habitat for fish or
wildlife species. This is an in-fill development and it does not have the potential to: degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. No impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
17.b. The cumulative effects from the project are significant but they are being mitigated to less than
significant levels because the subject site is being developed in conformance with the City of
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEQA Initial Study.doc
23
Temecula's General Plan and Development Code. All cumulative effects for the various land uses of
the subject site as well as the surrounding developments were analyzed in the General Plan
Environmental Impact Report. Given the projects consistency with the General Plan and Development
Code, the cumulative impact related to the future development will not have a significant impact with
the applied mitigation measures.
17.c. The project will not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, directly or indirectly. The church, school, and commercial component are or will be designed
and developed consistent with the Planned Development Overlay, the Development Code, and the
General Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR,
or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or
negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the
following on attached sheets.
a.
Earlier analyses used. Identity earlier analyses and state where the are available for review.
b.
Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope
of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed b mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
C.
Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and
the extent to which the address site-s ecific conditions for the project.
18.a. There were no earlier analyses specifically related to this project site. The City's General Plan and
Final Environment Impact Report and a number of special studies (listed under Sources) were used as
a referenced source in preparing this Initial Study
18.b. There were no earlier impacts identified nor assessments made, therefore there was no documentation
of impacts or mitigations to be used in the analysis of the current project.
18.c. The mitigation measures are addressed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, which is attached.
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.doc
24
SOURCES
(Available in the Temecula Planning Department)
1. City of Temecula General Plan, dated November 9, 1993.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, dated July 2, 1993.
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
4. Drainage Report Hydrology Study of Rancho Community Church Site, prepared by Jack P Norris, dated
October 27, 2000.
5. Air Quality Impact Analysis, prepared by Giroux & Associates, dated August 14, 2000 & update 8/8/02.
6. Earth Technics Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 53 Acres, Highway 79 & Constance Street,
project no. 99221-02, dated June 27, 1998.
7. Archaeology Cultural Resources Reconnaissance for the Rancho Community Church, prepared by
RMW Paleo Associates, dated July 2000.
' 8. Paleontological Assessment for 53 Acres Adjacent to State Highway 79 (Tentative Tract No. 15211),
prepared by RMW Paleo Associates, dated July 20, 2000.
9. General Biological Assessment for Tract 15211 Lots 1-10, by Principe and Associates, dated October
26, 1999.
10. Noise Impact Analysis for Rancho Community Church & Retail Project, by Giroux & Associates, dated
August 11, 2000.
11. Traffic Impact Analysis for Rancho Community Church Project, by Linscott Law & Greenspan, dated
February 27,2002, and supplemental dated May 17, 2002.
12. Fault Location Confirmation Investigation, Portions of Lots 3-10 of Tract 15211, by Petra, dated April
13, 2001.
RAP D 0\2001\01-0533 Rancho Community Church PDO-6\CEOA Initial Study.doc
25
O
Z
V
W
t
i
3
L
7
E
O
O
O)V
O
L
~
R
a
°C
0
i
O
°o
Q
CL
C
O
~
C
G
~
O
a~
O
C
C.
O
d
0
C
t6
FL
N
N
LO
O
r
Q
IL
N
W W
ai r
~
C
y
O
~y
N
a E
N
L a
N
0
Nc
a)a
O
0c-0
0
C
CL 0)
-
a) R L
L)
> O
a CO
CO
O)0
c
Uy
nm
O
a)c-0
O
T G
L
0
_
0 0 a
C
)
L C
N N d O)
0
3 m
d
N>
_ y c
>
U 7
c
N N
C N D N
-O
d
.a N N
~
'o
Y
c
W
ca cu
cc o
-5 3:
cd a
)
-5 m
CL>.
o a) m0
~d
o a) -
c
o a.E m
d
0)
N i
. N 7
N ~o N
Sa
o
co U)
UHd
CUE-(L 0
c
0
to
c
C
c
_o
co 0 ui
o
-
ca 0,
_a
d
C y'>
N >
c N>
'
'
Em
0
$m
0m
O
0 coo
0 0)
C
T
'0
T
'D
C U
0 O N
C
U)
o
0
N
0
a) 3
.
C
C
y
C
O
O
47
d fo
N N 0)
p
L C
O
C
m a
C L
C
w
N
(D
3Eo
,C
dEy
a a) T
nCC0-o
aam
c°Ec°\l
0E0IL
y
oo3E>W
Q) r
C O
E N N 2
N O C
.O a -O a) 'O
'NO d CO
a Cad
a)
15
C N F- ca 0 C>
0 c
'
a
CO
a r O o o m
o
¢
m U)
.
0 n m
m
c
3 m~o0?
O
N
~ NU 3 U).- 0
=
U
N t
<
d
> m N
(D co
a) ca
a) 3 a)
C
N.0 U C cu a1 N
E
N
N
O
'0 c
CD
co
y c E c c
co O
T
o
E- m a 0
co ~0
«mov°
a o 0~'0-
N
~
z
m
c
a CO N
c
ac0) E
-o "0ca ~
°
Co
o "L
a~
n=NU)o3y
L
3 0¢
c N
co a s
o ncai>dm
C d
d O o"~ V
C 0--- O'D CL U
E"a
aY
NO
my 0) 77 )
O Y
Q)
L
d
H
A
N
co t a)
a
N
u0i
N
o
dco
C
C
d0 om
_
N
G UX
Em N 0ZEa)Q)'
a1
m
N 0
3 d C C
U O) d- 0a L "O O C
0
2
a
U o co
a
N
c
¢
C
. a) N 'oo O 'O
V-0
u
c O
a
T
d
m
(n (5 a
0oo
ta
)
F-~.... d U
c:0
aa
~'SEcp
01L a N 47 a)
m
°
4)
N
m
y N
N ' y
m
«m
O
«asa
p
in
S
i
c
4
N d
c
L
Y
o
'OE
o
`0cro
m y
o
ro c
n
o m E
O.~
O
a
cas
N
3
O.
co
a
c
O
c
O
ac
j Co
-0
c m0
o
m
E o_
cu c L
N
2
m m
3 0
y
m
d
m
a>m'Um
>
d$
>
Om
~o:°o.
a1
N
Y
a1
U
a
ro o
9
m
C ro
ri dr=
c
tl1
o
7 3
p
C
O °i E O
C
a)
'
`
O1
7 E
u
oa
o,>.
i
0a
crood
oa) ca
T
m
v
'
¢a
0ao~
E m aa'
~c
¢a
ia
3
a
UF-ao
c
°
p
N
r
m o
An
E
d
o
N
a
d
E
0
CL
0 aa) m
CL r_ 0
o c
~v
an
d °a1
a-
E
-
0 °n
c
C
cc
O. V
r
0 ca
co
0
amO.h U
.
E
Oom
N
d`o`o
UC
0
-
y
5o
L
.
'0
« c..
La
-
o
~
o
G1
41
2
O
E
cli
O. U O E 9 0
_
N 7 (1 Ny
G
N min O • N
N
a C
N
.c
N
p
30c0U n
cui1Q Q
m'o
00 L
p
0
h C
N C
a
O
N
O
N 1° d'
C
ca
d
C
N .L-O N y c Co
N a1
.U y°j r
N ro
ca a)
N .Q `
w C1 c0 N O CO
(
a
a)
L)
cr
L
3: o
c 3 a
O
O L Y
v
N
cu
a
)
N~
Q
ca 0
o
N
V 0
a
E
°
X)
1 '
01
co
'
O c a c ai > N U
p
'
-
O
Y
?
aa)i c oa
m `
v a~
ms
a1
E
i>
~ c
j o
y
d ~ U m ° N
'
0
E
O V
i«
m
•
a
° o
d
ro a1
co
c
ro H 'S
~
N ro
c
0
E
co
on
C
ca ~
o
L E
o
o
N
0)
m
a U
d E
L U
0 O d a m N
p N 'p
m
j a1
N£
>i ~a -p
y 3 N
L 7« 'O m D C E
U o c c o
a r
a c
>
O aoz°
aacis
)o
000
o
ca -
DmDE° Ero
C
0r°
m
°
c
2N
°0
°
rn`
=oa1°a r a)
E
o
.a
a°
c o
0
c
0
u'c
m> E m
E o c
N 0
C U r
U
ca
'O C a)
E'er Y O N Q~ .C
o o
ro 0 m
Lbm ~
N
a c
E
Co =
ro c
C 3
m
U'oOCOO
y
o¢
a
0
o 0
L °o~ n~t
~ ma
o
C
p
N
C N U
N
C d
T
~'LU ca N N `1 mL
O
T
C
o
Z3
2
_
N O
~E-
o
0
O
Qn
ro
Q
0
W
Q
¢
tnhm a
N
=
>
>
Q
J
N
11 0 0
? ` N
W E
to O ~
U
U
0
C
0
N
a
N
C_
C_
C
a1
N
~
'N
N
W
U
U
0
r=
p
O
>
a
d
~
a
Y
Y
o
is 0
O
CL
U
a)
0
U
0
Ea
u
1
n
E
_T
¢a
Urn
(Ul~d
c
0
M
W
Y
d
U
rn a)
co
CL M
Cc
co
O
co
~U)
c
a
o
C3) ca
T
T
0
(/1
N
0
W
-
a1
0
c
c
_ d
T
`m 0 3 c
a
O. N C E
U
a) ca
O
_
N N
s`EE
m
E
r
c
aa)
O S o cu 3
0
C
'0 v
a '3 N U
0
0
(D
co a) C Q
:
00
O
.
.
00
U
,
0 C
3 ca j O T C
T~N007~0
N
0=>C
n C 0 0
O. W N co 'C
p 0
0
0 7 W
'0 a) C
~a d
00
L
L
C D
'
o'yNWN~
3
30
0) 0
N
m0
o
)
O U Q.` N N c C
c
U- cN T
~0 CO (D00
O.'0 3
N - 2
a)3 CO
U
U
O C N C N e N
N
7 CO
N r
0
„
0 3- O al r 0
co
N N a 0
O N '0 a)- 0)
a
C ` C
~ dLD U
«
O C t T O O a
Y ? 3 N
C T a, C C 0
N Co w
_ Op_ co N C N 0-0
UC
'
0
o (D
N
7
0O OO
3
O'D CD W
0 c
. 0C .
U O a
y
0
U~0~~0 z3 m
a) -ia
0 S -0
N N T m O' m O
E N L a
CO
O
2
F-aow ~wEa)
QUSNV
r
W
OI
i+
N
Cl)
~
J
I
1
fl
` N
A O
~
(
r
C
O
O T
.
O T
.
O T
.
U a
U L
U L
a0
a0
0.0
0.
c
C?
C 7
C 7
.
`
.O
.O
a
O
(1)
N
C y
C`
C
a7
U
O O
U U
U U O
U U O
p
w
'p
O
'O O) U
O C O
'D O) o
O c N
'O 0)0
O C a)
a
a
' =
0_
a
'
>
a
CL -0
(L v
v
a)
Y
Y
`
Y
`
Y
`
y
c
o
5 3
o
' >
<
0
' i0
3
o
5~O
a o
0 a
d ~0
?
o0 ~U
o0
0
E
o~0U
E
0
Z E >
maw
~ a
i~
~
U)
¢a
4) a)
c)H 0(L
CL co
0 CL
(L ca
c
0
~
G
C
C
C
d
d •O
Co U N
O) .O.
~
(U U N
O) (D
O U N
O)
CU U N
0)
_
S N>
_
C N>
C N .7
C N .7
0.=
O
o
o
'
'0m
E(n
QCa
~ a
o
er o
o
T
T
T
T
(n
(n j
N
(n
ca
V y
0
0
N
U
a1 ('J d ca
N
N U'
ca 7a
t%
c
cos¢ ~Q
c
L
C
cot3Q E¢
y
o
O E a
d
N
y
a N `
O
-0 C
0)
0-
Q
r N a)
0)d E
3
T
'd
T N
O a)
A N N
(n 0 '
N a) C
O cU O
O
a)6 a)
O. C 0 c
co
'
(a.
U
ca C 0 N
.
O
N O) O) N «'y p rn Q
C
a) C
'0-
a)
N
T
W
W N
a) O
.G
0 C~ a) C y
0
>
is D L E
O
C
C N E
U 7 id y N E of m U
D
0
N N N
N
i,E
>m~c
-0>
~w~
o-
0a) (D~a
i
caM
cu
'
a)
Q Cp
N
0
aa)) c E> L E O
0
'c~ 0 S
m
=co00
~~m
~oc0a) 0
w
Ey0
c
3 O U O.
N N
y
N
0- .O
3 i
y
y 0-.::; N a)
E C E c c 0 i)
y
a)
- 2
O
0.6
o= Q C y
L 0
70 O
w
CO CO M U = O .0 O
L (DD
CO d
.r
c3`c0-
a')0
n~aa)ia
>1 0
mpOV OOrayi>a
m3o
N
°a
U N N a1 c
a) d
O _ N.L.•
L O N N y O a.~ y
p
C L 0
> O
0
y
O CO U'.0-
y U m
O
a) L O y
w
c
L¢ > O
O. N w •O
c y
ro~
- O c
E
0.
m
c - NCO
L
T
C,
y
-o
m a)m
>.L y
Y
n cinin Ndm
3
:
a) i.
0
a)
M0
.
V O.
E L 3
0-0
> N
w ca
E
0 O 'O a d L
.0 ~D
N a) ~
= E
3
tea`)
330
°~0
c0>°.yrr04)OL o
c~Na)
o
L
N U
a)
te
N
o.
cm-oa)
oa) cN
0a)
a)
N a7
a>~?c=
~a
- Or a1
--oE3y.0 -0
-p 0- -00
C
r
o 0 >
oo
m
00
yd.
C
y N a) O
U L N
c`
L 7 0 O
O
(
U
U cU C N O d N d O N
10
2 U N
O
-
N
W
ca
«
N N U
3 co
a7 -
C
a)
' a p
m
~N, O m L N C N N
O a
C O
0
N 0 :5
a as co
.
N
'y U
d
O
0
t ~ a a«
m E
p
O
p
co
` N N a
U L Y
`
C
' ° E C
0. N O O a) O a) CO E
y O_
O m
c
c "O
.
.
~cpOa>ac
0
t0c
Lvm
t~ay~E~a>>
0c
0
=
¢-oo.
F OO
~icc 3..
F-itca.0 Ec0
a~om
m
O
Cd
_
'
v
cn
u?
n
i
¢
>
>
>
>
r
M
~nGS
>1
>1
EQ
cU
cU
cU
O
UL
UL
UL
U'O
0. 0
a 0
a 0
0.0
N 'V
C 'U
G 'V
C U
~
~
D
.0
C
O
N
d C 41
N
~ C N
N
w C N
N
w C y
m
_
U U O
_
L
U U O
U U O
U UQ
0
O
c)a)
O C)at5
)
O and
-0
O C
N
d
oo0
ooa
ooy
o,0
>
aos
a-o~
asp
aa~
a)
Y
Y
Y
Y
0
L0
i6
o
`o
o
c
U
75 ~
U ~
75
C.
O02
E :8
U
oa) -
E
o
9a)0
Ea
U
oa)U
En
0
D
a
.
~
a
¢a
a)
C) a'=a
:3
UHCL
D
t30)a-
0)(L=
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 (D
ca
0
a)
a)
a)
0)
a
i
0)
rnn
)
m2 a
d d
C y j
C y
C y>
C y j
7
O
7
U
7
(q
~Um
130 co
S
N
O0 CU
_0 >1
!n
N
~ J
N
~
N
U) CZ
y
0
7 U
f6 O
U
19 U' O
_ 7 U
d d
U
d d
1
i
d
s
sa ~a
. a1
s
sa
la
?xsa E¢
a
a EQ
n
x
x
r
N
Nc
y C N
~a)_a)
N >
co
0 O
T O
L y
F' N
E
C
0a
N N a
a) co
E
O
U
N
U
N p d
d j
C
>
a)
C 0 U
C
>
~.N E.9
N
m T
L c
L
o m
N
E
ia L
3 r
co
U N U
'
(D 0 (a
i
c
E O
d m
L a)
Z 0
t
9
E
a) O
O O C
a) 15 N
~
a1 Y
cc C E
_
N a U
C a
a m E
3 O. O) C
dL
N
o
.0 co a)
o a)
5 )
N
a)o o,E
Qo0
- 0) 0
-(M
m-o Eo
o~°
3cE
300
d co
d-_
O>
U
U
a N N
U
C
O O C
U 3
0
a)
CL
OO
CD
N d
O T -0 0
CL 0
U
Q C C
(
a) (D
] L
a) E 3
O C N
U
9
No a)m
a)
a)
aa)t
oo-
CD M O
caw
a)
~ O
m
CD
M
co
.0.
a N o
3- E
3
o m-0
_
`'5 o
5
m `oc
0
N
-O
CL
a) 3:
N
a!
c
a) '0 m -
N~N a>
S
0C
d a)
0N
c -o
OIDN
V
E0 =0 do
c
0~coi
a)
~Ea
a03rn
c
o
-
¢30 1L-d
¢Eo
¢0 3
H0. a)
c
m
OI
m
Q
0 ~
p
L
~
LP
_
Q
>
>
>
C
N N
~ of A
ND C
r UN
N
v a)
.LO. as
a) a)
=
ca
C r
_odm asc
w N LL co
L
d
N
r r
c m
C C C N N C
>
Z~i
a1 N Cc, a) N
° C N C
'O O J cC
> E N'gL U U
0
N a)-p 0
0 N 0.0 O y E c
L>- a 0) (a a)
T
N C N J
C
°
0
N c N c C° p O d
E
L td
N d `
-O
E G)
N
C
0
N Q V r
.0
- a
p
N V a a)
O
O c c a
0 a) --a
-
.
' L
O as c "
Q)) ro M win a)
°i
-
O
3> E a
0)i >
ai
O
LL a)
E
c
.
°
E
(D '0
'
r
O
L :C
H
O
c
C C.
> V N U
J
N
0 7
a) -0
C O' U U N> N
w
C
O
c
0)
N O .
U ,.N..
c-
°c
O)
vEc°mT °1~cdi°
O
°W °CLa)
~
a N
p
f
,
>m~mE
C)
~
- C O
as a
E
i Lo
a
d a)
- N p
S C
LL
d
LL
co C N O
a U n
>
N
.
p
.
d
C
`
C p
N
C
N
C
O
c
4)
E
as a) E E o
D ~ E
_3: E
0
a~
oaa)2as
om2c
o(D .?as
o0) =as
ayim
aE~aa
mmF'-
=aE~m ~
N7N
C
¢a
UHa0
UO o
(Uf-CL 0
UHa0
oa)c
m
a N
L_
L O
0 a)
N
a) r_ 4 0
a1 C N- N
3 co N
a O (D L O N
U -O a) C r
CM
C d
N C_ U N 4 a) U
N° L
N O U O N°
a E J E
a
N 7
O a) ° p a 7°
J U U
N J U
N
O a) 7 N
y
d
E
E?~N-
°w
°
~
ca
ai
am`oc~d~
~
~o
CU
o
a
c
)°ao
a
G)
L
fA
E r- as 0
y a n in w CL .L-. O_
Q a) o.
U) U O w r a.L. CL
r= E
A GL
Q f
U
'O c
O
N
U C
O
O N
(n =)C
r
E2
55 ~C
NC
U) r 0V
L
p N
O_Y co
~CCCL CL
mo
O
O_Y as
-CLm"0
p UY co
- odpa)
=F-¢aL3o
S,
SF-¢a3o
=F-¢a3o
U)
co
as W
N
w
C
~_a
L
a) O
N C
>
U
E
a Y°
~
c
.
J
tNp U °o
.
.
.O
O a c
N N .'L"
m as
L c
Q
N
'O N T
E c co
O C fa
>
.
.
_
m
J
c
>c
-
C
cc
(a
p
a
ca3
¢
o
a
a)
a
w0)
o
E a) c
0
)
a
3 a) c
~
o
E ` o
In
clJ
)
F- m
c
Y o
`J~U
N
r 00~ -O
M
d E a N N
yH dNa O)O•
0 U)
a) (D A
-
O L N
«
Q) Ewa, O°
m
N N E L
a)
as
0 .L... O a O C E
3~od
~m
(D Eaa))
E(Dc~a)>o
~
N
as Cc 0
~
C
E
N o
d H
r
p a
.
O) a)
a
c
y
m N
N
to a)
L
TO E ~L
m
N am
L
o
o
0
o
as o m E 0
as
a d w ~J
0 E
c
7 o Y o o a as
d
a
Co ° CL -
O` co T N a)
of
O
N O C
C c r _J 0 E N
CL w
0
_ a
0 as
C- 4)
C
G N U E
ca (D as 12 y> L a
E
.L-. L 0 a°) ¢
U N a1 c d c
U U
U
o d m a 'O
N
N
0- m
O
'O ui1
N a) ro O C
V J
.
.
N E a'p C N
O_
U as E a,
0
d C E L O. M T
°
wTRw
d
oL_moa ooa
E
cN
a)
c' dFJa)J
oaa
a
CU
mN
~3vW°a)E
as
a-~cc
v
E2-TNO~N
a)
O O N
-co
O
a) 0) o T ) C C`
c
J as N L_
N
'
o
O U a1 U d C o c
aN`a a
°
u~i
\
p-)'o °-)c.)0
'N T
c
i
EENEcaa
E
E
c a)
~
~
3
c
n
~
i c
~
LE v)O. me
0
d
c
O
a
as
N la
U N N O. U
o
J
.
a1 > a)
a) U f, O a)-
O O N !
m
N C) o N
N J-
N J
a) U J C
W
U C U a
as a) O. .L-. d Q
a) L U
as
r C O E pC1 O T
as
C
0
o
U Q1 U J
Hmao O.
L U
E as
¢N -
aom°coa
Q`o¢°Owco~
a
N
~
(a
N
CO
V
~L
H
>
>
>
>
yc ~ N
ro m
r Y
N
~ C
v c a)
d
an d g m
m n
ca
m
e
L C
~
Kao) CO c~
ro
O
-
N
S;
ro~
N
N
w~ s
LL
- di
c U
N
N CO C
> C C 'a
' r
L C
N N C
> a) 0) E ro Y
0
a) cc c
N y a) a)
cc `a ro O
E C
N O.'~-
U cu c
- C D U V
L> 0. m CO (D
V E O
N
r N N a N a> > cu
U)
C
U E O
ro
'a
N O :3 ro CL
0
m C 0
Co C
o
O C Oro
N c'y m
C
.
N Q L-
?
I
0
C c N E
(
L,
cc '0
E cm 0)
L
.
U
C
C
o
.
J
U C
-
V 0 N .
a~O
C
~
o
-
(D a)
Q0OEwE0c
W-0
C L=- -
O`
o
N W (D
O
.0 E
C
CD O N
V
N
N- L N
O.
>
:O E O Cl a) m
N D
Q
> N
a) N d c O c
ro
L a) L (U
a1 (D j d ro 0~ ro 0
L
E
.
L ro L co
a1 a) a N O Q Ytl
C C
E
>
N E
- "O
N da 0.
LL
F- N E
LL
C
a
a
N O)
Y c
'
N N
c
c
N O)
C
O
m
U)
m0m
caa)
caoa
i(
m0aa)caa)
0.
ro
53 E ro E
-5 E
3 (U
E ca E
E c
a
C
O N U N d ca
0
o N U m U
O N ca LL N
O (tea ca c
.
H r
T E a o o a
Z E a CL-C3
_T E c a-0 a
- aF o
ma.
CUFd0 CO
UhdO m
<UF-'a00 mo
UD o:°
0
a)
r
0
«O O
` E
o
c L O
E j a 0 T) L p w
0 O
o m t - E
Y
3: co
ro
Y
m~
N
D
0
-5
E
aa0r;0)
ro
CU Ca
o3La«ro~Eow0
ca
ca 0 0)croi
cc co
CL (D
~croi~
Ca ~j
-
I co
E5
E
'
C
C
V
CL T L O
N
0 0 0 j L L O
¢
c c
ai O N
E
$
y y C N
¢
y
_mE. aa.-
ov>0ol. a«a
n._
_ca
«
._a>a
T C
a)
T C
N
T
O)
T
V
N C
w C
U V U N V
to c
U ~f c`
U
~amdI ~m
mm~jo~
c
~ro~
c
~
. r «
r..m°o
~
¢a3p
Z Cca3o
a
i
=ao E
_
EF- Q20
a
`0c
ro
o
~
= m
ca
oa c
ro N
L
O« O
.3 C
m
ro O)
ro
-O N .L-.
C
0
N
L
O (D c
O r
D_ X
w
ro a1
a) Cu
a) c L
E N 6
-
U ro D
C E t5 .N.. N
ro
to l7 r
U a)
0
O
C L= N 0)
r ro 7
ronE
ca
(DQ)mro
Y ro c CL Z
_ro
n N
=
'O co
odo
o
N ro N' C C o
C 0) cc E o
=
'
z
TC 7
c N
as
p a g o ca m
=L Nn
E
m
m
d N ro r N
roro
3 L o
0
C
«
ro
O
0
~d~ccroi
'
rn°c
U
°
j O
O. E U
ro
«oro 0U)
~
U w ro U
O
ca Nro
= y N
ro
Q1 d
N
'
N 8) ch m Oa L
ca , m n
`Nro
O
CO
QC
0
co
E0oconT0.=
N ~
d <a
0c
mo
N O V
c
N U
N
U m 0 O N 0
L
=cro
0
ro note °
5a
c o c
°
E ro
a) cu
3
o
2)'55 U)
f
W
C
p W
0).Q 0-
.
o
d O N C OD
Y
0
a> 0 0
O
.
N« to Ol
Co ro
5
ro N
` W,
7 T« cu m
~
C
~ 5 m-3
ro
a3i -
> L T
He
ro
_
a0i ca ~ ctn
ro 3
N C
0
U r .L-]
wa
(D
°
d 0
Y >
c d
3 m o~ n
a o
m
c
c
v
3 c 0 =.N
d
7
y 0. O
N
o c
ca N vi
U c
y c U y 0'
N
N
ui
oNCRmc
'0
O a
U
o
3
c
O a)
o3a0'
ro
aNc33ro
0
aE
o~roro
m
aka)
oo~
omw(D E
' °mtm
r`
nv~>o
c
a) 0
a 0)m«amro0E
o
Fcco
4E'c
aE
oCOL
m
rn
cn
to
n
ao
E
-L
>
>
>
>
r
y ~ N
co W
Y r
co
'
Y/ Q
G
N
~
N
N
a p
~ as
a)
'
X70 0
:E;
9 L
N C
y CO N T
N U
y j
T
p
_
1
O)
CL.-
LL
d
c
0)
j M Co 0 >
c
j _
c
a N
7 E
O C _ y
- C= N
N U U N N
a) L C N N E
G
E o
o y m d o
a
E - C y ca a) 0
0
C N
0~ U L-.
) O a)
U
O N C N
vl
O N
U
a
a)
CD
0 co E
.H
c n N n a) N 0 y
C r E a) N a) y
O
>
a)0cayyyaC
°
°
°
L
Jya)d
LdO- (
- O
Ec
)
wc
)c
F
r:4~d~E
o
d
y
C: C
C
° c c
C N
N
c
a ob C C
7 0) o c E
C
co q E
G. >T
O N V « a
m
O a)
-
o
T' N
N
a)
S d
a)
7 co
'
OF- CO(n L..~
Q)
a1 7 f6
<UH OO U)
O
d
a
D
'o
w
O
E
j
C d
N
a) c
m a) C N
a m C
a)
.0
N a)
U-
E
'C
a)
a E 0)
p
vd.- c-
-
a)
CL.C
a) N c w
N a5 CL r- C'
C - N
co
7
7 ca O
00
E (A
Z N .E'= U lpa
(n y n w C
'O a)
O
a)
V
0
(m E
CO C r
O V
05 .
N C CO
O
N C! a
°
Co
0
ltl
0
J
v
ma
Na
C
O co
L 7 O N
N U
L.. L C
C r
d
2 -p (D ro 0 N
2 a7
m
a1
.
ca
a`)
yin a ~Q0w 0o•~
L 7
3c
a)
mx a)ma o HL CL
m
-
> a
>
NTa
p
-
N=
o a
a)T O U y R ai
L E C ca c
D
a
c)) tl7
L
o
c 7a
-0 N O w L
'L" U
L N
i
O
C '
CL
-
~
~~ro
cC
O
c
?
am Em
a
C
p
0
c
a
°
ca m u y-
p
41 ~L m E'-
E
N 3
ui a)wcm7 c - o n o
U 0>00-0 m 0
a) 0)
~
co caw
N L d
=m ocdyo`
` mCO>c
000
E3~ai
0
~ H C 'a a) N C N m G
'
0)
C
Co C 0 co a)
a
» N
N
C
O
m
75
7 a C 7 W
p
O p
a
C
-
-
C (D N 3
ca o .
v
0
m
o c a) c
co
a
5
p
(D N O N a) N a) O U= O cr,
CL
(a
E 0
-
O O« CO
a)
0,
. CO O. ca
c
rng 3
C
O m N Q a)
N
c
v 4)
O .o N
N
N
m
E
~
g
m
o
o
m
oCOcoca
W.-
U
C L
En
N
N
C _O a1 3 a1 l0 N C p
C
L
0 0,
w
-
3
N o p3 c 0" 0 a) o
~'o=~
c
y
0
o~~
cai ca c'v C
CL
N y
ca
p
a
N
m
c`
3 N Q N O J
0 C N
Lo dmo.a) and 3E
a) =3
>
N
0
om~' F-O~`oErn ~C7E00
0
a
)
v
i
.-0 cao
W
Z
X X X
X
m
8
9
u
E
0
v
L
U
E~
E
U
s
0
0
8
0
O
Lz
g
z
~
W
oc
N
° c
c o
co U
c
m 2
N
N
«
m
C N
° m C
m
C
O D °
C
0
L. E c
o
U
° O
O
o
ca C
N R o N
C N
A
U
Nacm
g._
°
O)Y
m a) a Vi
U U
d
J)
r:3Z ° J C
m
d°
>
OU
ina>Ea
as
d
oa
06
Z
c
c c>
a
m
W
4)
C
)
t
9
G
V 7 co
s la
C-:
C
co CO
V
C
C.T
N r
C mmcn
C a° -o
m
N N-a r
m C CL
m
c
c
c
N
aCa
d0)
oN
a0 ca
c
a
d0
:p
d y -p
.
.0 N C
a
0 m m
«
(0
° 1 C
m° co C
m o C o
01
EaNC°
EoNC°
Eo_ o)~O0
E
a) -mo°
°
2
m-moU
2
d = a~~a
5 0
a > N
d Oa)
>
a
- r 0 3 N ui
a
r 0 3 y N
f
- C O O p O c
° v
E
L a aL O
L O.O L O co
t° n O N N O
CN
(nmm NU O.
(n mm NUa,
(nco ca aCL J:C-
06 U
US N
O
O C
d
CL O
L d O
J
° E
v
co oU
co oU
in ~r
c
c
d m
d d C
.5 CL
m
w
OUOE
OUOE
S ma0
m
C
O) ,L_,
O
N
C
C
N V ca
3 dd
do
mQ
c
(D OL -0
J
° C
w
a
N
° C C
O N a m
m p)
O E
~ a v °
?
a)
-6 IL
o
o.
N C
~aU V (D i°
of
m?
n.3oc ~N c CF.
~
No
N C
L-
p1 c
. Sc
_
co a E C C G m
7 0
m o
mm -C o.E 0 o o
ti-C ca
-66
U 0 m m m 0
L j
°
p
L
r d ~ ca
NW
°
(a o
o)
a
c
i
CU N
CY c
0
ca w >
m C
O
N
om-o
L
C
. N O
.
U N
y(D Lo (D
Ln
N O r
>Em
CL
m
•
N L f0 .0 d d
m
`O N p
O. r U
co N a) ca co r-
U
1
1
-
C ro«
CL
m m
m J
O O.L
N j C
0.
-
N a
c d
N .t-~ r
`
` m U
v C
o~ ca
~ U .N N
L
mv °
m C
JAY
L
O
o)
aa° o Np Y c 3
c
E
C
° E o
d
X m« p !n
n
a)
- a
C N C
J
_
0
N C r o N°
'
a
-O N N
(0.0 N
N
d
N
0- mN J
O
r
E -c
C
w y
a
d
N O
N
a c y
N
N
U
r
r N
D) '0
'y itl d
- _
- d
m
a m m
(D
m
N
O
«
_
3 m .L.. co J 0 m
L
p)
t
N
(9
Q
X X
X
X
a
y \ N
W W
O
E2
O E
ro rn a E
O ~
V a
CD N o
c
0
cda
L
E
ray=
NU~ro
N
0.0 O
dL o
o
p
O v a)
)
N O.- u
0 a)
O
w0.d
2
CD E
CM
.
ca s
CL M
- O
.0
-0
°
y
>
ro
s
¢aO ?
- o c 5
Toro V
W
a
c U
ro _
c U
ro
c
E E
E a
p
Q
0 y
U.c
O ro G rd a y
c
U 0 y
O ro c ro CL
a
4) w
roa N
O
r-
c
cca
UF
-a0 CU
(U F- c
d~
r
E
O
ro
r
O N
O U
0 4)
G
N
0
) ca
n
p C C
d
0)
W
W
W
7
C >
QL
f
n
0 N U
Ey
d N a)
0~ W
N
N ro w
'20
W 0
W
(0 (D
a
(n aa) N
a
W
O
O) a) C
_W L
'o 00
y ro
r
O)
N c
a O y
r
Q
to
`
c¢cd°¢E
`
S¢roo¢
> C U ca
N a co r
(D _ U co a o ca a)
CL -0
«
c
U
0
m
E o
ro.~ U p0 cro ~ '
~ O
ro
(D Q) N
E
0 -
=
C
a C N 'O '0 a O V
W-
Ca a) (U
W
c
«
d
ro
N ro
F- ' C N Co
'
N
N
M -
. ro
ro
Co o) U c ca Co 0)a
Co 0 a) 0)
E
a)a-
0roO
:3
Uro"U =tC
UN-
? C
p
E a) E'
0
O
d a U C V j N U
N>- c
~
(a
a y E c 0 U
.0
U o j> °c)n W m ca
- 3 m
(D 0
a) N 0 y
c
c t co 01__ ro O ro C N U a O
3 0 0 0 w
CL
0)
0 E (D
a co a 3
U N N C y U ro Not 0 )
N
o)mm y W o W
~d 0 ac ? o)~ 3 woFa
'
t
a N N N 0 -
a ro
0- X- C
0 -0 a) j O j U ro ro
E
c vi
E E CM0
E o 0 oa (D
rn~ a) C c
N
c
roY p c
O
N ca 0 0 ro 0 o o c ro
a
co o 0-0 o)W
ac O NN
c roar
a) O ro c a
'
0
o a)
> 3
w
C a (J
0)
N
E
c
-
) - C N
ca in r ro o f a
~~om W 00
D)w0(D - (D cod al
R ro O ro N (D W
J ran c 0 0 O) C Q D O did
o-6 aE
N a- U 0) 0
co cat: ia dcc a)oc0a) 5`'N°
d U
0), L> c
V a)
a) Oro d
C
y
(D N C
a
a
7
4)
O
a) 0 0 C Co
ro
t
O
c
C
N
U ca o S2 p a= p ro d v
fd
'
'
'
'
N
4)
L
O CON m NN `V-
0
C ro N
5
0-o
5
0-o
N Y Y a) U a c ro id N 7 co
N C
O
-
-
>
N
V N ar 0
O
o °
In
a
O Q a) W D
a> O G_
c
t c w
a
O j w-0 (D m c d o Z
0 j N V x
`
L
o
a 3 0 o¢
o'.c W a) o) o-
o co
E F- o cc
W
pl
r
~
N (h V
>
> > >
2
U
X
X X X
0
N \ N
N N
7 a
~ a i0
in o S
<A O C
N
O T
U
L
O
N 01'C
a
a
Y
a E
J
La~,c
La'>.c
~
p._._ N
3 oU E
3 O~j
NU~a
O U
0
-0 a) r
a C i Co
a C r Co
C
p
_
U C a 0
C
E m O N
E p] O N
r
n0
O
~
~o
Ed
a U
L
~rn
a
C
m
rn
Z C
C
V
C`
N
V
C
U
c
ca
c
'
r
t
n
m
E
m c
E
m c
`a
o c 5
d
c a
c d
>
ii U a 0
>
LL Q- CL
L
a a
a
a
_
a
C
C y
o
)
5
C N
m °
v
5
c
O
°i E a
U C J N
c
O
0)
0
U r c :3
_
c
O c C ccc a
E 7
N t
T E C (3..0 `O
N r
T E C a U N
co a
7 a
a)
E c o. U oN
a a 7 a
a {p
cc
a a C
CUF-n.0 a~
a s
w
12
a
a
OF-d0a0cc
a -
5F-a0a0cc
0
c
0
a)
a)
r
U
C
Ja
H
N
cn
N
cm
EC
a d
a
«O
)
'a
Ol M A
E 9
a
O
O co
a
rn
O
O
a
p
N
M.0 -
D'Oca
U/
E 0
(Oa
a
c
doa
T C
o o a
a a m
co d _m
a
VJ N N a N
a
c ro` ro N
~
a ro cm
ro JA
7
U N
ata rna
'0 O
7
~
U y a t\O
G
_7. w a f\O
U
p
ui
`
N
EQ a zQ
O
<n
a J a N
aUOC Tn
J
a a« N
CL N
o
G T'> 'O m a N
c
a
. N C C L
u
a
c
co
7
a c
.L. O
O
asU 5aro -0->,~
cc
o
ti 3
°
oo ro 02.0 roo ~
ro
a
E
ca
-
co
-0
a)
2'02
>
n a s
s m J
o> N o d
.
0
~ a
a
E
m O U Ca
'C U L
a
a
a
a
a
L_ a L
0
N 'O
0 T a a N 0L
„
c~aU
o=
a
a
0L
V
d'occ(Ij
~
U
o)` -oaa > YN
'
o
o
a cam-
O
0 0
moron
0 0 C
D CM
y- 0)= o 0) C Y
a
a
`
a
a
h
0 U
y
ro a m p» O y U c ro N
a
C d O T U 'N
Q
a
Q
a
o y
«
a a a
ro p
J o
a U co
Y
CO °a c
°
~
mv
aa
>
a
c
-
a-00W
a) :3 a 0
w> m o°- 0
a
'
a
a
a
E C a N
q co
i
v
a
a
E a° L
(
3> j 0 ? o a .o
L~ N D
ro E a
Q
a
- CM O V
m
.
m
.
a a
0
0 v1
a
D
a s T a o
=
0
O
co 3 >a a o as c c E m
O
m
O
m
-
°
w R
o o d m
0-0 O a C` a a L U C
a
w
c_
a a a
>
'O a N o
-0
v
SroMQ,awNa a)gcoi
N G
>
=
U
d
a
roE
a
mo
3E
N
a
C?
L
U E
C
N
N
ca
N
m
a a
cc
.0
a a L
-
0 CL 0
C
O =
C N N N N N~ pN CC (D
a
~ N
a
A N
L 6
O -
N L.. N
.
p o a o
p
O a D) -O CD E
E o
_
a) p a a
N i
N E
7 E
a 'O
D C J L
L
» C V Ol a E a w
r C
O O
.
O O
y p N Co U
O O
Mn-
J U
d
d
(d a) a -
3 0
co
o d
N N
a a
a 0 a co d
U)
i
E
~i Ol 0 a Y7 C C a
N
~
v a CM m O`
.0
y w- o
10
a
7
N
U C ro C Z L Y1 a s
O
a
O
_
N
N
O'D C` d
0
O N 0 a
a
C
a a T,- O C
a C J
0
-
Y
Y
a L 7 a
o
d a > d
C
¢
a
j 0 -O 0 L C
) L a a h 0
d J
N 5
.J
0 3 a
N
a
O E N X
`
o
OE~aaU~n T5 Q)
z0
zU
a
a
aaa~
a
a
rn
Lo (
r
00
>
> >
>
>
U
X X
X
X
W
W 4n M
f~ O c
N N
a) N
s~ a C
L~~ C
3 oC) E
3 oU E
C r
-C
C
C
Co
EmCU CL ON
a)
-C m
E ON
O
co o
4) m
N m.O0
v
O) ry 01
CU
u
O) N D)
'c
W
c
c
L
`
°E
t
0.0 m
E
(D
c
ca
a J
>
Na
LL 8
ii
ya
d
y
ca ac co a)
o ac m aa))
C
7 0) E c) - U
7 0) E E
C
O T
O .C r m~ 7
00
C a
O .
v CO C J
UN
E C 0
N L
o
TE
T
-
¢a
C~Haoa(U¢
iF-aoa.0¢
c
~
>
j
W
N
h
N
N
W W
-O
'c
. D
D
W
O
ca
O
W W
mY
O
m`_
O
O i
m
m
CL CL
o
m N
m a)
N
a)
m-UmN
m O
_
-Em
m 7 N
L
L 7 0 N~
O a>
O
N
dJN=N
dU¢ do
0):3Q N
ac>a~ m~
v
-0 a)
'a `o m Co
cm
-
m-
'
m
mmo
t~ 1
co cu
3
c
_0 '0
0
M m a r C
N
m N O
a
N JC co N
ca Co
a)
M
Cc 'o
Ea:?
o'
` ~ ac)
. E
c
E
c a) N O= L 0
O r
L
C. N> C d o U
"7O a$ U
ca m O N N
EEd'ro~
'O a1 d 7
yY~y
u
~ a) ~ J
U
O y .O N
a)
al
-TI
7 y '
b
N
L
O
(3)0 N m
d
'O (D U c "O c
` UO o
W
c
m C T C 7
mm m o
m n
m
N m e
.
01j N W E N
W V y 0
co _
C a) .
co
o C O O- O W
p
j 0
0 W O n -d
a)L m' v
W
w
N O y
dy
a
a
E~ U D C
N O
d
W~
U
m
-
d
m r
~
cm
om
m N
c
to
N
0
O N tti) O N
7 O)
U E i
`
t
7 d
o.L
c
s
O
T O) 7
m
`
gmm
~m
`
m
n
om
`
o
a
~Q
~o
3
=
ro~2
O)
m
o
j
j
X
X