Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-082 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 02-82 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00- 0470, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A CHURCH AND SCHOOL CAMPUS TO ACCOMMODATE 1,800 STUDENTS ON A 39-ACRE SITE. THE OVERALL PROPOSAL WILL INCLUDE t46,826 SQUARE FEET OF RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION WHICH INCLUDES: A 1,500- SEAT, 26,927 SQUARE FOOT, INTERIM SANCTUARY WITH ASSEMBLY ROOM AND NURSERY, A 300-SEAT, 5,856 SQUARE FOOT CHAPEL, A 11,860 SQUARE FOOT ADULT EDUCATION BUILDING, A 3,500 SEAT, 43,727 SQUARE FOOT WORSHIP CENTER, AND A 'rwo STORY, FOUR LEVEL, PARKING STRUCTURE (WITH 918 SPACES TOTALING 380,023 SQUARE FEET); AND 136,771 SQUARE FEET OF SCHOOl.. FACILITIES FOR FIRST THROUGH TWELFTH GRADE CLASSROOM FACILITIES CONSISTING OF: AN INTERIM MODULAR SCHOOL CAMPUS WITH A TOTAL OF 17 MODULAR CLASSROOM BUILDINGS, TWO ELEMENTARY SCHOOl.. BUILDINGS TOTALING 64,158 SQUARE FEET, A 28,826 SQUARE FOOT MIDDLE SCHOOL, A 17,900 SQUARE FOOT HIGH SCHOOL, A 9,696 SQUARE FOOT PRE-SCHOOL, TWO-UNIT FIELD HOUSE/RESIDENCE BUILDINGS, A 16,194 SQUARE FOOT GYMNASIUM; AND A TWO-STORY, 44,406 SQUARE! FOOT ADMINISTRATION/OFFICE BUILDING, GENERALLY LOCATED ON NORTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST FOR APPROXIMATELY 3,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS A PORTION OF LOT 3 AND LOTS 4, $, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-060-00t THRU -005 & 959-070-003 THRU -006. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and Rancho Community Church, filed Planning Application No. 01-0522 (Zone Change) and Planning Application No. 00-0470, Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan, for the property consisting of approximately 54 acres generally located on north side of State Highway 79 South beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for approximately 4,000 feet, for property described as portions of lot 3 and lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211; also known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-003 thru -006 ("Project"). R:/Resos 2002/02-82 1 The applications for the Projects were processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on July 31, 2002 to consider the applications for the Projects and environrnental review. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Projects, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-22, recommending approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Zone Change, and Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan for the Project and recommended that the City Council approve of a Zone Change for the Project. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-23 recommending that the City Council approve of a Zone Change for the Project. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-24 recommending that the City Council approve of a Conditional Use Permit for the Project. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-25 recommending that the City Council approve of a Development Plan for the Project. On September 24th, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. On September 24, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 02-80. On September 24, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Zone Change for the Project when it adopted Ordinance No. 02-04. On September 24, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Conditional Use Permit for the Project when it adopted Resolution No. 02-81. Section 2. The City Council hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code: The proposed uses are in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. R:/Resos 2002/02-82 2 The proposed uses are in conformance with the Genera/ Plan and with ali applicable requirements of state/aw and local ordinances. The p/an to develop a church and school campus is consistent with the Genera/ Plan Land Use designation of Office Professional and with the adoption of the Planned Development Oveday for this area, in as much as it sets development standards that permit schools and sets height/imitations such as two story building heights. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall development of the land as conditioned, and designed protects the public health, safety, and genera/welfare. The development plan for the site is consistent with the Planned Development Over/ay document and conforms to all of the applicable sections of the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines regarding safe site design that control/ed and signalize access points, assigned student drop-off areas and structures that can be developed to meet building and safety codes. The aesthetics, of the site and structure will both compliment and enhance the surrounding homes and the community. The design of the site has ali access points and most parking kept away from the adjacent homes. Provisions have been made to create a safe environment for people and to minimize the visual impact of the project, and all phases of construction wi//be inspected to ensure compliance with the applicable building and fire codes. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. Provisions have been made to minimize the visual impact of the project, and all phases of construction will be inspected to ensure compliance with the applicable building and fire codes. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Application for a Development Plan (PA00-0470) for the design and construction of a church and school campus to accommodate 1,800 students on a 39-acre site. The overall proposal will include 146,826 square feet of religious institution which includes: a 1,500-seat, 26,927 square foot, interim sanctuary with assembly room and nursery, a 300-seat, 5,856 square foot chapel, a 11,860 square foot adult education building, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship center, and a two story, four level, parking structure (with a 918 spaces totaling 380,023 square feet); and 136,771 square feet of school facilities for first through twelfth grade classroom facilities consisting of: two interim modular school campus with a total of 17 modular classroom buildings, two elementary school building totaling 64,156 square feet, a 28,826 square foot middle school, a 17,900 square foot high school, a 9,695 square foot preschool, two two-unit field house/residence buildings, a 16,194 square foot gymnasium; and a two story, 44,406 square foot administration/office building; generally located on north side of State Highway 79 South beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for approximately 3,000 feet, for property described as a portion of lot 3 and lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211; also known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-060-001 thru -005 & 959-070-003 thru - 006, subject to the specific conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. R:/Resos 2002/02-82 3 Section 4. Tile City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of September, 2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 02-82 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 24th day of September, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Comerchero, Pratt, Stone 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Naggar, Roberts 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Sus~an .J~nes, C~MC City Clerk R:/Resos 2002/02-82 4 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) R:/Resos 2002/02-82 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. 00-0470 (Development Plan) Project Description: Development Plan to for the design and construction of a church and school campus to accommodate 1,800 students on a 39-acre site. The overall proposal will include 146,826 square feet of religious institution which includes: a 1,500-seat, 26,927 square foot, interim sanctuary with assembly room and nursery, a 300-seat, 5,856 square foot chapel, a 11,860 square foot adult education building, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship center, a two story-four level parking structure (with a 9t8 spaces totaling 380,023 square feet); and t36,771 square feet of school facilities for first through twelfth grade classroom facilities consisting of: two interim modular school campus with a total of 17 modular classroom buildings, two elementary school building totaling 64,156 square feet, a 28,826 square foot middle school, a 17,900 square foot high school, a 9,695 square foot preschool, two-unit field house/residence buildings, a 16,194 square foot gymnasium; and a two story, 44,406 square foot administration/office building; generally located on north side of State Highway 79 South beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for approximately 3,000 feet. DIF Category: TBD Assessor Parcel No's: 959-060-001 thru -005 & 959-070-003 thru -006 Approval Date: Expiration Date: September 24, 2002 September 24, 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,314.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to R:/Resos 2002/02-82 6 the Community Dew~lopment Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. , 4. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Planning Application No. 01-0522 for PDO-6. 5. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D" (Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. 6. Construction plans shall provide enough details and dimensions to show the differences between planters, pavement and/or the plaza areas when reviewed during plan check. SITE PLAN: 7. The berming as shown on the site and grading plans appears as a 2:1 slope along the entire site despite the description of varied sloped and heights mentioned in the PDO document. The requirement for varied slopes shall be shown on the precise grading plan. 8. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. R:/Resos 2002/02-82 7 9. The pilaster shall be enlarged to provide a greater offset of the walls continuous length. There should be locations where the wall is offset, not installed and/or the height appears to be as little as two feet. 10. Provide greater meander or offsets to the wall in those locations where the wall does not have any offsets or undulation for over 300 feet along the highway. 11. The location of the site amenities noted in the PDO document shall be referenced on the site and landscape plans for review and approval during plan check. 12. Continue the sidewalk along SR-79 South into the ball field on the west side of the driveway and expand the entry area to accommodate the sidewalk. 13. Indicate the type of durable benches and tables to be provided for the occupants of the administration building. The Director of Planning shall be provided details of these amenities during plan check for approval. 14. The construction plans shall include design details of the paving, plaza, walkways, and site furniture consistent with the design standards in Section 8.B (Accent Elements) of the PDO and subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. 15. During review of the, construction documents those items not currently provided in detail for verified compliance with the PDO shall be requested and reviewed for consistency with the PDO standards and subject for to review and approval by the Director of Planning prior to issuance of the building permit. ELEVATIONS: 16. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits "E and F" (Building Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division as amended by these changes: a. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be screened by building elements that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet shall be raised to provide for this screening. b. Landscape planter boxes shall be utilized on the other elevations of the parking structure to provide softening from the upper parking level as describe in PDO Section 4.E. (Circulation Plan - Parking). c. Relief shall be provided to the rear and side elevations of the field house to break up the bland wall areas. Elements such as windows on the second floor sides and columns on the rear similar to the front could provide the type of relief desired. 17. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. Material Finish & Color Windows, doors Copper Penny green glazing Stucco wall face Sandelwood #46 - Tan R:/Resos 2002/02-82 8 Molder and columns Wainscot veneer Roofing Trellises Pre-cast concrete Grey #3 Split-fact CMU veneer - tan Spanish "S" tile - California Mission Blend Copper Canyon LANDSCAPING: 18, The Landscaping Plan shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape Plan) and as amended by the following: a. Provide a landscape planter in all parking lots (used for permanent parking only) between every tenth parking stall and at the ends of each row, There must be one tree for every four parking spaces within the parking field. All planter islands must have a 12- inch courtesy curb and shall maintain a minimum of five feet of inside planting width. b. The planting areas around the buildings shall maintain at least 5 feet of internal space depth and width to sustain trees and shrubs. c, Increase the size of the five landscape fingers along the south side of the parking structure to the equivalent of three parking spaces or install a large (10 feet or more) landscape planter along the entire south side of the parking structure to offer the opportunity for large growth trees to be planted to provide an additional vertical element of landscape screening from the highway. d. Blend the 2:1 berm that creates the backdrop behind all entry points from the highway so they do not appear as sharp-engineered slopes. Blend the berms into something more natural and inviting such a bowl at these entry points. Be sure that the landscape plan and grading plans can express the finish appearance. e. A landscape Phasing Plan shall be prepared to coordinate the extent of the landscape installation proposed with each developing phase of the project. f. To the greatest extent possible, permanent landscape areas shall be installed around the modular campuses. g. Larger landscape buffers shall be provided around the modular campus and will be subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. h. Several trees shall be installed around the perimeter of the temporary play yard of the modular classroom to aid in screening and to offer shade to the students. i. Prior to the preparation of construction landscape plans the streetscape design shall be reviewed for consistency with other development proposals along SR-79. j. Due to the scale of some elements of the landscape plan the applicant shall, prior to preparation of any construction plans, meet with the Planning Department for review of detail elements defined in the PDO document that are to be incorporated and shall be approved by the Director of Planning. LIGHTING: 19. All parking areas shall have lighting including those areas serving dual purposes as hard surface play areas and overflow parking, to assure nighttime safety and security. 20. Lighting on the upper deck of the parking structure shall be on timers set to turn off the lights by 11:00 p.m. R:/Resos 2002/02-82 9 21. Lighting sources on the parking structure will be verified for compliance with the PDO's description during plan check to verify that it is not visible from off-site. 22. Lighting of the ball fields shall not be permitted until such time as a lighting design and operation plan is approved by the City Council '";~ *~; .... ~;~; .......... ~ ~"~ ,,,;' ~'~' l~m~4~.~ (Amendment recommended by the Planning Commission 7/31/02) SIGNS: 23. The maximum height of the Rancho Pueblo Church and School reader board sign shall be 12 feet. A signage plan detailing operation of the reader board shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to issuance of the sign permit. (Amendment recommended by the Planning Commission 7131/02) 24. The freestanding multi-tenant sign shall be limited to eight (8) feet in height with up to six tenant listings of equal size. 25. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 26. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 27. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 28. If necessary the applicant shall revise the necessary Exhibits (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan, Color and Material Board) to reflect the final Conditions of Approval and submit five (5) full size copies. 29. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit of the colored architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 30. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. R:/Resos 2002/02-82 10 31. Throe (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped aroa for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 32. All requirod landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Diroctor of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 33. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be fired with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the securities shall be released upon request by the applicant. 34. Each parking spacE; reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and .';hall be centerod at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000." R:/Resos 2002/02-82 11 In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 35. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS General Requirements 36. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 37. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 38. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-way per Caltrans letters clated May 16, 2002 and May 22, 2002. 39. Approval from Metropolitan Water District shall be obtained for any work within their easement. 40. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 41. All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association or property owner. 42. The vehicular movement for Highway 79 South at the westerly access to the site shall be restricted to a right in/right out movement subject to approval by Caltrans. The method of controlling this movement shall be approved by the Director of Public Works. 43. The applicant shall provide an on site "park and ride" facility in coordination with the Director of Public Works and to establish a mutually agreed upon number of parking spaces, (Amendment recommended by the Planning Commission on 7131102) Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 44. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 45. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. R:/Resos 2002/02-82 12 46. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 47. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 48. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and rnitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be the responsibility of the Developer. 49. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 50. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Metropolitan Water District d. Caltrans e. Planning Department f. Fire Prevention Bureau g. Building and Safety Department h. Department of Public Works 51. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 52. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 53. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit R:/Resos 2002/02-82 13 54. The Developer shall pay a mitigation fee in an amount acceptable to the Department of Public Works. Said fee shall reflect the percentage of impact at each intersection and shal~ be in accordance to the traffic impact analysis dated May 17, 2002. 55. Prior to the first building permit, a final map shall be recorded, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 56. Prior to the first building permit in Phase III, a fault hazard investigation shall be approved by Riverside County Geologist. 57. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401and 402. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 58. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) b. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Chapel Lane. c. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Rancho Pueblo Road 59. Roads shall be designed and constructed to meet City public road standards and remain privately maintained until a connection is made to a publicly maintained road to the east. The following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets as shown on the site plan: a. Chapel Lane - Entry (64 feet curb to curb) to include the installation of street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Chapel Lane (48 feet curb to curb) to include the installation of street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) c. Rancho Pueblo Road - Entry (88' R/W) to include the installation of street improvements, I:~aving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) R:/Reso$ 2002/02-82 14 Rancho Pueblo Road (66' R/W) to include the installation of street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) Sports Center -. Entry (24 feet curb to curb) to include the installation of street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) f. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90). 60. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate b. Storm drain facilities c. Sewer and domestic water systems d. Under groundin9 of proposed utility distribution lines 61. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 62. Bus bays wilt be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by Riverside Transit Agency and approved by the Department of Public Works. 63. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 64. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 65. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. 66. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 67. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy in Phase I, the traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Rancho Pueblo Road shall be installed and operational 68. Prior to the first Cedificate of Occupancy in Phase II or before any access is provided, other than an emergency access, the traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Chapel Lane shall be installed and operational. R:/Resos 2002/02-82 15 69. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern MunicipalWater District c. Department of Public Works 70. All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 71. The existing improw,~ments shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. BUILDING & SAFETY [)EPARTMENT 72. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 73. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. S55 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 74. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 75. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 76. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 77. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effectiw; April 1, 1998) 78. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 79. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 80. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. R:/Resos 2002/02-82 16 81. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 82. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 83. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 84. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 85. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 86. Provide precise grading p~an for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 87. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 88. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 89. Show all building setbacks. 90. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 91. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 92. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 4850 GPM with a 4-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measure.,; as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given R:/Resos 2002/02-82 17 above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) 93. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. Fire hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B). 94. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 95. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020) 96. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Each phase will have to stand-alone for purpose of access and water flow. 97. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 98. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 99. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 100. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) 101. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 102. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 103. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature R:/Resos 2002102-82 18 block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the Ioca~ water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 104. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 105. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and le,gible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and /or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 106. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 107. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall instal~ an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 108. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, based on an extra burden of protection a standpipe water delivery system will be installed in any multi story parking structures. 109. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 110. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire De2artment building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 111. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 112. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled R:/Resos 2002/02-82 19 combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81) 113. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 114. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA- 13, 24, 72 and 231-C. 115. Prior to issuancE; of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 116. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any change.,; in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 117. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT The TCSD has reviewed the Development Plan for the aforementioned project and conditions the project as follows: General Conditions 118. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 119. The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure areas. 120. All perimeter landscaping, on-site lighting, interior medians, signage, pedestrian walkways, fencing and sports fields within this development, shall be maintained by the property owner. Prior to Building Permit 121. The developer :shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication requirement through the R:/Resos 2002/02-82 20 payment of in-lieu fees, based upon the City's Subdivision Ordinance for the field house residence buildings. 122. The developer shall pay the Park and Recreation, as well as, the Library component of DIF at the rate regularly collect by the City for the field house residence buildings. 123. Prior to issuance of Building permits or installation of arterial streetlights on 79S, whichever comes first, the developer shall file an application with the TCSD along with the final Edison plans and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said streetlights into the TCSD maintenance program. OTHER AGENCIES 124. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Transportation transmittal dated May 22, 2002, a copy of which is attached. 125. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated November 29, 2000, a copy of which is attached. 126. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated November 28, 2000, a copy of which is attached. 127. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information Center transmittal dated December 4, 2000, a copy of which is attached. 128. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Fish and Wildlife Service transmittal dated February 12, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 129. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California transmittal dated January 16, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 130. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of the Army transmittal dated March 23, 2001, a copy of which is attached. 131. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control transmittal dated December 26, 2000, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Name printed Date. R:/Resos 2002/02-82 21 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 FW Fourth Street, 6~ Floor MS 72,S Bemerdino, CA 92401-1400 NE (909) 383,6327 ( o9) 38. 8 0 GRAy OAVIS, Gq~mor May 22, 2001 08-Riv-79S-I 8.000/18.629 Mr..Thomas Thom~ley Planning Department' City of Temeeula P.O. B°x 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 MAY 2 4 ZOO! By Dear Mr. Thomsley: , PA00-0470, Rancho Commtmity Church, Malknff & Associates, Applicant · We have completed a prehmmary rewew of the informatiOn detailing'the above, referenced project, proposed for'dew;lopment along th~, north side of State Route 79-$Outh',-between. Jedediah :Smith-Road and Aye..nida de Mi~s. iones,. :This. pr°jeet proposeb.deyeloprnent of a ombined,chumh pti ~ h'ool faciUty~ 39 0;acm · ' c .'and,va sc - ,-: ..... ,:.... : . OYel':a: site:: ' . ,-.:','.-. . , . '. ...... "*' Four om cuou ph-d.s prop0 cd to"ldJ VC' vat 'co, p[ ti.n to include: a 3;500:scat won~hip ccntcg a,l,500-seat assembly hall~ buildings ~Or preschool, grades K-12 and adult education; a gymnasittm; a four-story office building; a four-level parking structure, and; several lighted ball fields. Iris our Understanding that.approval for an'alternative Phase I development plan consisting of a preschool, Ip'ades K-8 along with signalized access to sR ?p South, is set for consideration at Public Hearing this evening. Because important suppo~ling data was not included in the traffic impact analysis provided for ~view, acornprchcnsivc eYaluation ofimpacts to $I~ 79 South cannot be completed. Other Issues affecting project impact to this facility were not fully addressed in the analysis prepared by LinscoU~ Law & C-reenspan, dated July 17, 2000. We ask that addilional information addressing the concerns described below bc provided lornur consideration prior to app]:oyal of this proposed use: 1. Provide copies of Appendices A through D as cited in this report for m0re complete : · .eYaluatiol!. of study conclusions andTrecommendations.... . - , .. 2. Le,~'¢l'0f service analysi~ of rout~ impi~c~ -banii0t be a~ccpted a:s Shb~i, ii ,since-traffic.. - c'-:-"gcneratioll..aa_soci~ted.witli othcz app. mYed pmjc..c, ts. in'the amais not inc]udext. Although 'i :;,*:.]ocated'io~unincqrpoolLed: C._o_tm~ of Rivc~ide territOry~ ll'a_ffi(~ 0liginating *frorn.~these '*':' developments .wffi~imp. act this'facility; Trip data associated.with other.nearby proj~ts is .,. necessary to identify intersection impacts related to through lane and turning movement !mpact~, vehicle storage lengths and signal timing. Mr. Thomas Thomsley May 22, 2001 Page 2 3. Signal warrant analysis for Constance "A "and "B" was not provided in this traffic study. The justification for signal installation at these locations is therefore not verifiable. 4. Future strip ¢ommewial retail uses are described in the traffic study however, pertinent data regarding specific use and building size is not provided on plans. Build-out commercial impacts at Constance "B" cannot, be fully evaluated. 5. Information addressing potential highway impacts associated with lighted bali fields and future league use is not provided in analysis. Weekend and/or evening peak hour demands to highway operations is unclear. 6. Issuance of a Caltrans encroachment permit will be required for all constmctiou proposed within SR 79 South R/W. Review and approval of highway improvement plans will be necessary prior to permit issuance. Plan design to beconsistent with Highway Design and Traffic Manuals, relevant construction policies and practices. Information regarding permit application and submittal requirements may be obtained at: Office of Permits California Depa~iment of Trausporta~.'on 464 West 4th Street, 6th Floor, MS-619 · San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400 (909) 383-4536 On a related subject, coustruction of an anticipated raised median with the Pliase 2, Highway Improvement project is not yet complete. In light of the continuing growth in this area of the ' District, this consUuction is now viewed as an integral component of route operational integrity. Until all above issues affecting SR 79 South are addressed satisfactorily, we cannot support the conclusions and recommendations described in this analysis provided. Without necessary clarification of these issues, no permits for any work within State R/W will be i~sued. ' We thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have any questions r~garding this letter, please contact Ms. Rosa F. Clark at (909) 383-6908 for assistance. .- , · Sincerely, LINDA GRIMES, Chief Office. of Forecas~ing/IGR-CF-~A Review Transportation Planning Division ' J. Pagano, Highway Operations D. Allen, ElectriCal Operations N. Athuluru, Encroachment Pesmits-Riv. Co. C:~d~ Wofl~'~a~,iv~79,~aJh\T¢ m\79S-Tl~U*A00-0470.doc November 29, 2000 I,h~ D* Herman ~mbe F. Ko Thomas Th0mslcy, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Offica Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAH,ABILITY PORTION OF LOT NO. 3 AND LOTS NOs, 4, 5, 6,.7, 9, 10 AND 11 OF TRACT NO. 15211 APN 950-080-001 THROUGH 9~0-080-004 AND APN 950-090-003 THROUGH 9~0-090.006 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0470 RANCHO COMMUNITY REFORMED CHURCH Dear Mr. Thorusley: Please .{~i .advis~ll tlmt 't~d'kl~ge-referenccd property is located whMn the boxmd~e~ of Rancho California Water District (RCWD).. Water service; therefore, would be available upon completion of fina.cial arrangements between KCWD and the properly owner and the construction of all required on-site and off-site %rater facilities. If fire protection ~s.requited, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and reqmrements. Water availability .would be coutingent upon'the property, owner sj~oning an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWI). If you slmuld have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRIcT Stdv0 Brannon, P.E~ '" Dev61°Pment'En~heering Ma~age~' · 00k~B:~240W012-T6WCF ~',~, ____.~ _~OUIVI'Y OF RIVERSIDE. HEALTI~i SERVICES AGENCY _q?ART ENT OF ENVIRON E ' L HEALTH November 28, 2000 City of Temecula Plannin$ Department P.O. Box 9033 ~remecula, CA 92589-9033 AttonQon: Thomas IC Thorasloy RE: Case Number PA00-0470 ' Dear Mr. Thornsle~. · respective disMots shall be required. The Riverside County Department of Environmontal Health has reviewed the proposed church and school campus and hag no objections. The project is to be served water and :sower by Rancho California Ware/District and Eastern Municipal Water District respectively. Prior to any building approvals, detailed "will-serve" letters fi~m the I-~nd LI~ and Water F.~neez~g * EO. Box 1206, iTr,~t~e, CA 92502.1206. (909) WaS~J60. FAX (909) 95,%8903. 4080 Lemon ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ALIFORNIA IIISTORICAL t~E$OURCE$ IINFORMATION ~YSTEM oem~ment o~ .~=~ogy ure,~y of ca~m.~ R~skle. CA 92S21-~18 December 4, 2000 TO: Thomas K. Thornsley City of Temecula Planning Department RE: Cultural Resource Review Case: PA 00-0470 (Conditional Use Permit) · Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System have been reviewed to determi_ne if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cultural resources: .The proposed project ;!rea has not been surveyed for eultoral resourcos and contains or Is adjacent to Known cultural resource(e). A Phase I study I$ recommended, Based upon existing data theproposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study IS recamrnended. A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #87814883) Identified one site designated CA-RIV-6499. The project area contains, o.r has the Ix~slbility of containing, cultural resouross. HOwever, due to the nature of the project or po~ data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources Is not a~tlcipated. Further study Is not recummonded. . A Phase I ~-ultural resource study (MF I ) identified no cultural resomees. Further study Is not There IS a Iow probability of cultural resources. Further study Is not recommended. If, during construction; c~ltural resources are encmmtered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while s qualified archaeologist evalueto$ the finds and makes recommendations. DUe to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, esrthmoving dur;ng construction should be monitored by a professional archaeologist. ~T~e submission of a su~tural reeom'ce management report Is recommended following guIdelines for ~sh~e~eetogioal Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation, en,'etlon Planning Bulletin 4fei, December 1989. . Phase I Rec..ords search end field survey  Pitusa II .T_e~ti. 'rig [Ev.a_luate resource, slgnlfioa ..m~; propose mitigation measures for "significant' altas.] Phase III .M?l~otion I.U. at~ r .e~ovety oy excava~son, preservation In place, or a combination of the two.] Phase IV Monltur eartlmtovlng activities ' COMMENTS: The report (MF//4883) recommends that the site undergo an evaluation to determine its significance and, if neceSSary, appropriate mitigation measures. If you have any questions, please contact us. Eastern Information Center united States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife SerVice Ecological Services Carisbed Fish and Wildlife Office 2730 Loker Avenue West . Carlsbad, California 92008 Thonras K. Thomsley City 9f Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 ' Temecula,'California 92589-9033 FElt 1 2 2001 Re: PAo0-0470, Condition. al'Usc Permit, Portions.of Lot 3 and Lots 4,5,6,7,8,9 and 10, Tract !5211, City of Temecula, Riverside County, California Dear Mr. Thomsley: We have reviewed PA00-0470, Conditional Use Permit, located in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California, received in our office on February 1, 2001. We offer the following COmments and recommendations on the biological resources that could be affected by the · p~ .topos..ed,' ~oject based on our knowledge of sensitive'and declining Sl~/zies'and-habitat ~ iii ~t~e ar. e ex?neemed about ~'take'.of federally listed species protected under the Endangered ' · IX~es ,act of 1973 (Ac0,- as amended. S .ec. fion 9:of the Act prohibits the take of any federally listed endange~d sp~ies by any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Take includes "harass" and ."harm", as defined by section 3 of the 'Act. Hara~ in the definition of take means "an intentional or negligent act ok omission which creates the likelihbod of injury'to wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to siLmlfieantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns: which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feedlng~ or'sheltering," Harm in the definition ~f -take in the Act means . act which actually kills or mjutw~ wildlife. Such an act my include siLmificant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kill.q or injmes wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering"' .(see 50 CFR § 17.3). Take incidental to an 0thenviae lawful activity may be authorized under sections 7 or 10 of the Act. The proposed project is to design, construct, and °Pemte a church and.school campus on a 39- acre site. The project site is located on the north side of State High~;ay 79, southeast of Sedidiah Smith Road, and. West 6f Margarita Ro~l. This area is known t6 support habitat for the federally ~ndangered Qulno checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas cditha quino, "Quino,), least Bell's ~ (lftreo be.l[ii pusillus), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus)~ bievin's b~ben3r (Berberis nevinii)~ and threatened ~oastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila catifornica catifornlca, "CAO1W'). Populations ofthes~ species have been documented within i ½ miles of ~he site,, including the southwestern willow flycatcher documented within.the immediate vicinity of the p~posed site. Additional sensitive species known to occur on and around the proposed Thomas IC Thorusley. site include, but are not limited to, the orange-throated whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus), southwestern pond turtle (Cldmmys marmoratapallida), yellow warbler (Dendroicapetechia), Los A~ngeles pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus), and golden eagle (,~quila chrySaetos). Furthermore, ffhabitat Such as coastal sage scrub, vernal pools, or clay soils occurs on the proposedproject site, then the site may support listed species. Therefore, we recommend that focused surveys be conducted by a permitted biologist within suitable habitat on site prior to finalproject approval and any ground disturbing activities. If these wildlife species are present on the propos.e~l_ project site, take authoriT~tion pursuant to the Act will be required before the project can proceed. This area is also known to support habitat for the federally 'endangered Stephens' kangaroo rat (Dlpodomys ~tephensi, SKR). The proposed project occurs within the boundary of the SKR ' Habitat Conservation Plan for We, stem Riverside County. Compliance with the regional ingidental take permit will be required prior to any ground disturbing activities, Based on the Alternatives Development Document, clislributed by Dudek (October 4, 2000) for the Western Riverside MUltiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the site is near the proposed ~',onstraio. ed linkage that runs along thc southern side of State Route 79, as defined by proposed Alternative 1. The proposed project may affect the design of a future MSHCP and ' · ahould be evaluated for consistency with the ongoip, gMSHCP planning efforts. ffwetiands.or Waters of the U.S. are affected by the proposed pr°J~ct, a U.S. Army Corps of En~neers section 404 permit and/or California Department offish and Game 1600 permit may bo required. We recommend that impacts to coastal sage scrub or any other sensitive resource be considered cumulatiyely .significant under the California Environmental Quality Act and · .mitigated prior to anY g~und disturbing activities. 'We app ' pportunity to ' 'proposed project fly have any reclate the o review and comment on the ou .q es~ons or comments please contact Dahlia Boyarsky of my staff at (760) 431-9440. Sincerely, · ~"dJimA. Bartei. Assistant Field Supervisor 1.1430-2001 'CEQA.I 386.1 Glenn Black (CDFO, Chino) Mel Malkoff(Malkoff and Associates) Jerry $olliffe (Rive~ide County) Richard Lashbrook (Riverside County) .© METROPOLITAN WATER D/STRICT OF SOUN-IERN CALIFORNIA O~ffc~ office G~eml Manager San Diego Pipeline No. 3 Sta. 1561+00 to 1566+60 R/W Parcel No. SDA-P-4-1 Substr. Job No. 2029-00-021 City of Te~necula Plmmi~g Department · P.O. Box' 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dear Sir: Rancho Commtmity-Reformed Church "Thank'you ~r yohr notice, which we received on December 5, 2000, submitQng ptints of a site Plan'(Sheets 1 through 3 of 3) and Phas~g Ivlap (Sheets 1 and 2 of 2) for the proposed dcwlopment of the Rancho Commun~ Reformed Church property located north of Slate Route 79 and oast of Jedediah Smith Road in the City of Temecula. We have reviewed the submitted plans, and our comments and requirements are as follows: 1. The locations of our 50-foot-wide permanent casement and 75-inch-inside-diameter prestressed con~to San Diego Pipeline No. 3, a~ shown on lbo submitted plans, arc in ganeral agr~ment with our records. 2. The proposed storm drain channel that discharges onto o~r ~asffment as' shown on the plans is u~cc.~ptabl~ to M~tropolita~ V, re rcquir~ ~.~ any stormdrain flows which am directed a~oss our right-of-way bo conveyed in a lined olXm. chann¢1 or ~losed conduit. Please request that the proj/~ct proponent comply with this requirement. "3~ M~opelitan requires continuous acoess along our fight-of-way at all times for roulino patrolling and malutenunce. We also require 16-foot-wide gates capable 9f accommodating Metropolitan's locks in any fencing that is proposed to cross our fight-of-way. Facilities constructed within Metropolitan's easement shall bo subject.to the paramount'right · of Metropolitan to use the easement for the purpose for which it was acquired. If at any time Metropolitan-or its assigl~s should, in the exercise of their fights, find it necessary to remove any of the facilities from the easement, such removal and replacement shall bo at the expense of the owner of thc facility. ZOO N. Alameda ~ee, L Los Angeles. Calif¢~ia 90012 · Mailing addr~: Box 54153. Lo~ Angete=, California 90054-,0153 · Telephooe (213) 217-6000 City of Temecula Page 2 During construction, Metropolitan's field representative will make periodic inspections. We request that a stipulation be added to the plans or specifications to notify Mr. Gene Patricio of our Water System Operations Group, telephone (909) 926-1501, ext. 5809, at least two WOrking days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of our facilities. For any further correspondence with Metropolitan relating to this project, please make reference to the Substructures Job Number shown in the upper right-hand comer of the first page of this letter. Should you require any additional information, please contact Mr. Kieran Callauan, telephone (213) 21%7474., V~y truly yours, General Design, Rel~fio~ ~d S~ M~er KMCTSQA/Icm DO~: 2020church .© Office of the Chief Regulatory Branch · lVlalkoff and Associates Attentiom Mel Malkoff ' · 18456 Lincoht Circle Villn Park, California' 92861 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY~ LO5 A~Gm ES DISTRICT.~ CORP~ OF ENGJNEERS P.O ~OX ~'11 ~ 23, 200z · Dear Mr. Malkoff: It has come to our at[e~ttion that you plan to build a chtu-ch/school complex (Rancho Commtmity Church) near an unnamed IxYbutar7 to Temecula Creek'in Temecula, Riverside County, California. Tltfi~ activity may ~luire'a US. Army Corps of Engineers permit. A Corps of Engineers pe, U,~t is required for the discharg~ of dredged or fill material into, ~ndudir~g any redeposit of dredged material within, "Waters of the United States" and adjacent wethnds pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972..Examples include, but are not 'limited to, 1. creating fill~, for residential., or commercial development, phcing bank protection, temporal.. .°r permanent, stodcpili~, of. excavated material, building road .crowings, backfflllng 2. mechanized landdearing, grading which involves filling low areas or land leveling, ditching, channelizingand other excavation activities that would have the effect of destroying or degrading waters of the United States; 3. allowing runoff or overflow from a contained land or water disposal area.to re-enter a water o!me United States; · ' ' 4. placingpilingswhensuchplacementhasorwouldhavetheeffectofadischargeotfil1 DAVID P. ZAPPE C~t~al Manager-Chiff Engi~ca* tUVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CON'. AND WATER CONSERVATION DIS'. City of Temecula P~nnln~ Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 925894?033 Attention: '7'A/~MFI~ ~ Ladies and Gentlemen: ' Re: '909/788-9965 FAX P/~ oe~- o 470 ~99s M~a~r STR~T RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/955-1200 Vel7 Italy yours, F- MCKIBB~IN Senior. CMl Engineer Date:..,~.~-- - ~