Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout91-073 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 91-73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 224 TO CONSTRUCT A 149,500 SQUARE FOOT RETAEL CENTER ON 19.7 ACRES AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WINCHESTER AND MARGARITA ROAD WHEREAS, Bedford Prnperties filed Plot Plan No. 224 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plans on June 17, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify wither in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Plot Plan; WHEREAS, the City Council conduced a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plan on June 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceeding and Staff Report regarding the Plot Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decision be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met; (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, Reso 91-73 including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a) There us a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied or which will ve studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action compiled with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community, (hereinafter "SWAP°) was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside county, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the city has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code to wit: (1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 224 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. C) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirement of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements Reso 91-73 2 and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. b) The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. (2) The City Council, in approving the proposed Pot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 224 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The project, as proposed, conforms with existing applicable city zoning and development ordinances. Further, the proposal is characteristic of similar development approved by the City to date. 2. There is not likely probability; of substantial detriment to;, or interference with the City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The project is of insignificant scale in context of the broad goals and directives anticipated in the City's General Plan. 3. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 348, 460; and California Governmental Code Sections 65000-66009 (Planning and Zoning Law). 4. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration; circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use. Adequate site circulation, parking, and landscaping are provided; as well as sufficient area to appropriately construct the proposed structure, reference proposed Plot Plan No. 224, Exhibit E of the Staff Report. 5. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect the public health or welfare; nor will it adversely impact the built or natural environment as determined in the Initial Environmental Assessment of this proposal. Reference the attached project Conditions of Approval and Initial Environment Study. 6. The proposal will not have and adverse effect on surrounding property, because it dose not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development regulations, and reflects design currently existing in the proposal's general vicinity. 7. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable, by vehicular traffic. The project site's primary frontage is on Winchester Road, a dedicated CalTrans right-of-way. Improvement of the abutting roadways shall be as per Reso 91-73 the City Engineering Department and CalTrans. 8. The design of the project together with the type of supporting improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through;, or use of the Property within the proposed project. None are exhibited on the underlying parcel map, nor are easements evident on deed(s) describing the property in question. 9. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. Supporting documentation is attached. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Envionmental Coma iance An Initial Study was performed for this project when determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant impact would result to the natural or built environment in the City because impacts will ve mitigated b adherence to he attached Conditions of Approval which have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. SECTION 3. Conditions That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Plot Plan No. 224 for the operation and construction of 149,500 square foot retail center located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A. attached hereto. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 1991. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATTEST: Ju reek, City Clerk (SEAL) Reso 91-73 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of July, 1991 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Lindemans, Munos, Parks, None None June k, City Clerk Reso 91-73 EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHMENT 4 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Department Parcel Map No: 26852 Project Description: 14 Lot Commercial Subdivision with 2 Remainders, on 97 acres located at the northwest corner of Winchester and Margarita Roads. Assessor's Parcel No.: 911-180-026 1 . The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension maybe approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. 2. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The expiration date is 3. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the City Engineer and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 4. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 5. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a City maintained road. 6. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. 7. Provide reciprocal access, parking, drainage and maintenance agreements between all the parcels through an REA or CC&R's prepared by the applicant, reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and City Attorney. Document to be recorded with the final map. 8. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated April 24, 1991, a copy of which is attached. A:224PP.CC 15 9. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated April 15, 1991, a copy of which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits. 10. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Department's letter dated March 7, 1991, a copy of which is attached. 11. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan. 12. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: a. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial) zone. b. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. 13. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety Department. 14. The following notes shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: a. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory." b. "A Liquefaction Hazard Report (County Geologic Report No. 793) has been done for this site and is on file in the Planning Department." C. Construction excavation has high potential to impact significant, nonrenewable paleontologic resources. A qualified vertebrate paleontologist must be retained to develop a mitigation program prior to issuance of grading permits. 15. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: (1) Prior to the issuance of grading permits detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning 8:224PP.cc 16 Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: a. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. b. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. C. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. d. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. e. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. f. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked. 16. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the San Bernardino County Museum transmittal dated May 6, 1991. 17. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: a. All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required elements from the subdivision's approved fire protection plan as approved by the County Fire Marshal. b. Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval. The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping. 18. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: 9:224PP.CC 17 a. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. b. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection. 19. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. 20. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative Parcel Map No. 26852, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. 21. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. 22. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/ developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d) (2) plus the Twenty- Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). 23. Dedicate right-of-way along Winchester Road along remainder parcel. 24. The applicant shall comply with recommendations set forth in the County Geologist transmittal dated April 23, 1991. A:224PP.CC 18 25. A 25 foot wide transportation corridor easement shall be dedicated along Winchester Road. Engineering Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. 26. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. 27. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 28. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: - Rancho California Water District; - Eastern Municipal Water District; - Riverside County Flood Control district; - City of Temecula Fire Bureau; - Planning Department; - Engineering Department; - Riverside County Health Department; - CATV Franchise; - CalTrans; and - Parks and Recreation Department. 29. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. 30. Margarita Road from Highway 79 to the proposed bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek shall be improved with full improvements or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 100 (861/1101). 31. In the event that Winchester Road (Highway 79) is not constructed by Assessment District 161 prior to the final map recordation, the developer shall construct or bond for the improvements to provide for one-half street improvements plus one 18 foot lane per CalTrans Standard (110'/ 1349. The improvements shall be constructed per CalTrans letter dated March 14, prior A:224PP.CC 19 to occupancy. 32. In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. 33. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Winchester Road (Highway 79) and Margarita Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of access points and public street intersections as approved by the City Engineer and CalTrans. 34. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 35. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 36. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Final Map. 37. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer. 38. A Notice of Intention to form and/or join the Landscape and Lighting District shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District information shall be borne by the developer. 39. Notice of Intention to join the median island Landscape Maintenance District shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in District information shall be borne by the developer. 40. The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. a. Street improvements, including, but not limited to: and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. C. Landscaping (street and parks) . d. Sewer and domestic water systems. pavement, curb street lights, traffic control A:224PP.CC 2 0 e. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans. f. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines. 41. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with adjoining developments. 42. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the City Engineer. 43. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. 44. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineering Department. 45. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. 46. All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the City Engineer. 47. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the City Engineer. 48. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent. 49. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer. 50. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards as determined by the City Engineer and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County Standard 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk). 51. The subdivider shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. 52. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be submitted and approved by the Engineering Department 53. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and A:224PP.CC 2 1 submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 54. The subdivider shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 55. A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 56. On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-of-way, shall be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." 57. As deemed necessary by the Engineering Department, a copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District for review. 58. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the City Engineer permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Engineering Department. 59. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. 60. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone A subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this project shall comply with Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula regarding flood damage protection for development within a Flood Zone "A", which may include obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA. 61. The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the area within the 100-year floodplain. 62. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 63. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office. 64. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets or drives, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's A:224PP.CC 2 2 Office. 65. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. 66. Prior to any work being performed, an application for a Development Permit shall be submitted per Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula. All requirements of this ordinance shall be complied with as directed and approved by the City Engineer. 67. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 68. A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within the following right-of-way: Winchester Road (Highway 79) 69. A permit from the County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 70. Should this project lie within any assessment/ benefit district, the applicant shall prior to recordation make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district unless said fees are deferred to building permit. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: 71. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 72. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 73. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public A:224PP.CC 23 c to rot e re Au`~e t e 0o Pertne "c~ bete{ % etar to{ 1 • C ee mvr9 \s P9 d`t\u , tre a\\ \)e a\d P9kassv o{ tr GO o~ {or bond ds trati\mated vt`°rs o{ tra`stc\°a°t { ~t tre tre tar e5 e. • y~or {ee ° \mp Cote t o{ deny a row 8y coJ act tCa{{~ t to P { . e° \ P Ss o{ G~o {ee otest ~rcZO . at org \ts t9\ef ,xce o{ su t to P{ ary mgt v9+a`J~ a0°vr and art C\9 r. r ° tra{ r°t the curb and e arf matzo ar\°PeC a and C,'( . ea to, trees c`r\e~t\ a de vepact f GGVQ PN r°t ~~~~aCK~ay t o\\ > J `ded t o{{ \c ~S OF O 6\(\c3 b oacrey P tC a{{\c a o \F\GP is \rc~ ~e aPPC oPer to v+\r9 GER er dr air {o\\° \\or E OF 0.4 ON -ae a\c streets . sra\\ rem C\- al Os3 a ara st j oe er`° Pub\~ tC VC r t ~ct~or \ess ,at s ratio , 31 • o a\\ `rt v~r\rgCoos r9 co ~~ed P,pesect`°r is oaas r aet°uCS ra\\ bra;Bx\z V\iolf to a o ~\ty eC\\' ,es ac,%r9 a sra\\ G~~\\ \or { t sore. 00 co mots \steredC R°aet O\s sP\, ra\t ec~{\ a reg c res ts stye \t . -o tr d Ns aCa SP r by {or,N\r r tr inert a yar Star MPP \es%9 eer aed 'a he State eer\r N~ F \N P~ be vre G~vi roe e c J ed A Er ~r N OF sra\\ aratrd sra ~r9~r co aPPrtat~or CO?-'O P~ \O C \P~r9 PG to ~o , tre G~ty ram Per E 9`reeC • r tr s o C\ O RE ' rg ar pProa Ma eteCm`red QeR`,(`\ {c, . a {v~a tre 6m eXPer ay{ 19rojed d uP PNi `rsta\G .60 ars .30 P a\gV\eer Cgl \a s as G` Je\oP as e`N\9o a aPP \r\t9•`93 o e0ert P OF OGG sra\\ be\d by ea at e t r rdm r9`reeC . \~p v P\~G \p~r9 tre C°~\rc d ar P e G~ty O \SS ara s fo jed ~r a\\ oe P ara \or ar by t1n ~R\OR s~9r~ a as aPP tr°\ s R°aaeCSed rectea tra{{\ o{c Ma J e~ {Co a d as 1$ • PP\ars ON ae \ eer P rteC\s ct`o a {.a ter s b 19 • rlc s vay r tCa{{ 14