Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
042319 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 23, 2019 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION - 5:30 P.M. The City Council will meet in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 to evaluate the performance of the City Manager and establish goals and performance objectives as required by the City Manager's Employment Agreement, and pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 to meet with its designated representatives, Mayor Mike Naggar and City Attorney Peter Thorson, to provide direction to the designated representatives concerning the negotiation of changes, if any, to salary, compensation and/or benefits for the unrepresented employee position of City Manager. Any such changes would be approved by the City Council as an agenda item in open session at a regular City Council meeting. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: Cadenza String Orchestra Invocation: TBD Flag Salute: Council Member Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart, Naggar PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation by Magda Stewart of Trauma Intervention Program Presentation of Proclamation for Arbor Day Presentation of Proclamation for Municipal Clerk's Week Presentation of Proclamation for Rose Haven Heritage Garden Week Page 1 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. On those items, each speaker is limited to five minutes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Attachments: Agenda Report 2. Approve the Action Minutes of April 9, 2019 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of April 9, 2019. Attachments: Minutes 3. Approve the List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Attachments: RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands Page 2 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 4. Approve City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2019 Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2019. Attachments: Agenda Report Treasurer's Report 5. Adopt Ordinance 19-02 Amending Portions of the Temecula Municipal Code to Add Definitions and Make Minor Clarifications and Typogrgphical Corrections (Second Reading] Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 19-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 1, 8, 10, 15, 16 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD DEFINITIONS, MAKE MINOR POLICY CLARIFICATIONS AND MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance 6. Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Veterans of Foreign Wars. Temecula Vallev VFW Post #4089 for the 2019 Memorial Day Observance (At the Request of the Military Subcommittee - Council Members Rahn and Schwank) Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Veterans of Foreign Wars, Temecula Valley VFW Post #4089 for support valued at $700 in City support services and $11,415 in promotional services for the 2019 Memorial Day Observance. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement 7. Annrove the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Snurlock Landscape Architects for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Sidewalk Improvement Guidelines Recommendation: That the City Council approve the second amendment to the agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects, for $5,000, for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Sidewalk Improvement Guidelines, for a total agreement amount of $87,317. Attachments: Agenda Report Amendment Page 3 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 8. Approve License Agreement with Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, for Wireless Installations on Public Structures 9. 10. 11. Recommendation Attachments That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR WIRELESS INSTALLATIONS ON PUBLIC STRUCTURES BETWEEN LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS AND CITY OF TEMECULA, AND FINDING THE ACTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA Agenda Report Resolution Agreement Approve the Minor Construction Services Agreement with Moore Fence Company, Inc., for Old Town Temecula Community Theater Fence Installation Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Minor Construction Services Agreement with Moore Fence Company, Inc., in the amount of $42,404.51, for Old Town Temecula Community Theater Fence Installation. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement Approve the Minor Construction Services Agreement with Morningstar Productions, LLC, for Community Recreation Center Amphitheater Lighting Installation Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Minor Construction Services Agreement with Morningstar Productions, LLC, in the amount of $46,149.63 for Community Recreation Center Amphitheater Lighting Installation. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement Approve a Five -Year Minor Maintenance Agreement with Pacific Striping, Inc., for Citywide Repainting of Traffic Striping Services for Fiscal Years 2020-2024 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve a Five -Year Minor Maintenance Agreement with Pacific Striping, Inc., in the amount of $1,764,926.00, to provide Citywide Page 4 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 Repainting of Traffic Striping Services, to complete two cycles in each fiscal year, for Fiscal Years 2020-2024; 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve additional work not to exceed a contingency amount of $176,574.00, which is approximately 10% of the Agreement amount. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement 12. Annrove a Five -Year Minor Maintenance Agreement with Trueline Construction & Surfacin Inc., for Sports Court Crack Repair, Resurfacing, & Striping for Fiscal Years 2020-2024 Recommendation: That the City Council approve a Five -Year Minor Maintenance Agreement with Trueline Construction & Surfacing, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $300,000, to provide Sports Court Crack Repair, Resurfacing, and Striping Services for Fiscal Years 2020-2024. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement 13. Annrove the Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement with Computer Alert Svstems Inc., for Fire and Security Alarm Monitoring Services for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Annual Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Computer Alert Systems, Inc., in the amount of $10,000, for Fire and Security Alarm Monitoring Services for Fiscal Year 2018-2019. Attachments: Agenda Report Amendment 14. Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with Falcon Engineering Services, Inc. for Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-09 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with Falcon Engineering Services, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $150,000.00, to provide professional construction management services for the Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08. Attachments: Agenda Report Amendment Project Description Project Location 15. Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with T.Y. Lin International for the French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements - Phase II, PW 16-01 Page 5 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 16. Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with T.Y. Lin International for the French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements - Phase II, PW 16-01, increasing the contingency amount by $150,000; 2. Increase the City Manager's authority to approve Extra Work Authorizations by $150,000. Attachments: Agenda Report Amendment Project Description Project Location Approve Parcel Map 37021 (Located at the Northeast Corner of Pechan,�4a Parkway and Loma Linda Road) Recommendation Attachments That the City Council: 1. Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreements for the tract and accept the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreements; 2. Approve Parcel Map 37021 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval with TriPointe Homes, a Delaware Corporation. Agenda Report Fees and Securities Report Vicinity Map Parcel Map 17. Establish an All -Way Stop Control at the Intersection of Del Rey Road at Avenida Buena Suerte Recommendation: Attachments That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ESTABLISHING AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF DEL REY ROAD AT AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE AND FINDING THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15301(C) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES Agenda Report R esnlntinn Location Map Page 6 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 7 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President James "Stew" Stewart ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board addressing that item. On those items, each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 18. Approve the Action Minutes of April 9, 2019 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of April 9, 2019. Attachments: Minutes 19. Approve Agreement for Consultant Services with RJM Design�Group, Inc. in the Amount of $256,200 for the Completion of a Community Services Master Plan and Appropriate $26,200 from Measure S Funds to Cover Contracted Amount and Reimbursable Expenses Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve agreement for consultant services with RJM Design Group, Inc. in the amount of $256,200 plus a contingency amount of $20,000 for the completion of a Community Services Master Plan; 2. Appropriate $26,200 from Measure S funds to cover partial contract amount of $6,200 and reimbursable expenses not to exceed $20,000. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT Page 8 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 14, 2019, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 9 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO MEETING TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 20. Approve Fiscal Year 2019-20 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan Funding Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2019-20 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM AND FINDING THAT THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN IS EXEMPT FROM THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT AND THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Exhibit A Notice of Public Hearing 21. Approve Update to Existing Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 15-73, THE "UPTOWN Page 10 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 22. TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE" 2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 19- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 15.20.020 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THE DEFINITIONS OF COMMERCIAL USES, INDUSTRIAL USES, MINI -STORAGE USES AND PARKING LOT/STRUCTURE AND DELETING THE DEFINITION OF RETAIL USES, AND BY AMENDING SECTION 15.20.030 BY APPLYING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA IN -LIEU FEE AND CREDITS TO THOSE AMENDED USES, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PROJECT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15378(B)(4) Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution (lydinnncP Nexus Study pdate Notice of Public Hearing Approve Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Recommendation: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 19- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, TO CLARIFY THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON -CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS, ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS, AND FINDING THAT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDLELINES SECTION 15162 AND BASED ON THE ADDENDUM TO THE ORIGINAL EIR, NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL Page 11 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 REVIEW IS REQUIRED (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17-0724) Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance F.xhihit A Exhibit B Planning Commission Agenda Report Planning Commission Resolution Notice of Public Hearing BUSINESS 23. Adopt a Resolution Reaffirming the Principles Outlined in the Constitution of the United States of America (At the Request of Mayor Naggar and Council Member Rahn) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REAFFIRMING THE PRINCIPLES OUTLINED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution 24. ADDoint Subcommittee of the Citv Council to Assist with the Selection Process for State and Federal Legislative Consultants Recommendation: That the City Council appoint a two member subcommittee to assist staff in the selection process for state and federal legislative consultants. Attachments: Agenda Report DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 25. City Council Travel/Conference Report Attachments: Council Travel Report Itineraries 26. Community Development Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Activity Report Statistics Charts Page 12 City Council Agenda April 23, 2019 27. Fire Department Monthly Report Recommendation Attachments: The the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly Agenda Report Statistics 28. Public Works Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Project Status Report COMMISSION REPORTS PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 14, 2019, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 13 CITY COUNCIL - CONSENT ITEM NO . 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None ITEM NO . 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 9, 2019 - 7:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 6:30 P.M. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation. The City Council convened in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) to discuss one case, the County of Santa Cruz, et al., v. Bureau of Cannabis Control, et al. This case was filed in the Fresno County Superior Court. CALL TO ORDER at 7:02 PM: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: Susan Miyamoto Invocation: Pastor Tim Thompson of 412 Murrieta Flag Salute: Zack Schwank ROLL CALL: Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart, Naggar PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Chaparral High School Science Olympiad Team PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individual addressed the City Council on non-agendized items: • Jennifer Scharf • Cindy Bustos • Maryann Margosian • Mark Katan CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart. The electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard 2. 3. 4. 5. ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Approve the Action Minutes of March 26, 2019 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of March 26, 2019. Approve the List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Approve the Placement of the Karel Lindemans Memorial Bridge Sign on Overland Drive Recommendation: That the City Council approve the placement of the Karel Lindemans Memorial Bridge Sign on Overland Drive. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Schwank; and electronic vote reflected Approved by: Approve Funding for Michelle's Place to Enable the Expansion of the Cancer Resource Center (At the Request of Subcommittee Members Ma, o�ggar and Council Member Edwards) Recommendation: That the City Council approve funding for Michelle's Place to enable the expansion of the Cancer Resource Center, in an amount not to exceed $58,000 based on al:2 matching donation representing one City dollar for every two dollars otherwise donated towards the building expansion, and appropriate said amount from the General Fund unassigned fund balance. 6. Approve the Three -Year Agreement with Thomson Reuters for Annual Subscription to the CLEAR for Law Enforcement Plus Online Database for the Temecula Police Department Recommendation: That the City Council approve the three-year agreement with Thomson Reuters for the annual subscription to the CLEAR for Law Enforcement Plus Online Database in the amount of $33,782.19. 7. Approve a List of Projects to be Funded by Senate Bill 1 (SB 1) for Fiscal Year 2019-20 Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A LIST OF PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 8. 9. Accept Skyview Park into the City -Maintained Park System (Located Southwesterly of the Intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Roripau h Valley Roq�d Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING SKYVIEW PARK INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED PARK SYSTEM Approve Specifications and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Rancho Vista Road, Pasco Goleta to Butterfield Stage Road, PW 19-01 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Rancho Vista Road, Paseo Goleta to Butterfield Stage Road; 2. Make a finding that this project is exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301 Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. 10. Adopt a Resolution and Authorize the Ci . Managerto Approve and Execute Documents Related to the Exchange Agreement between the City of Temecula and Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. (Lot 87 Easement and Drainage Easement) Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED EXCHANGE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND TRI POINTE HOMES, INC. (LOT 87 EASEMENT AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT) 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute any necessary documents, including the Forms of Grant of Lot 87 Drainage Easement and Grant of Permanent Easement attached as Exhibits "D" and "E", respectively, to the Exchange Agreement, and to take all necessary actions to complete the two grant of easements, including without limitations, all escrow instructions. 11. Award a Construction Contract to EBS General Engineering, Inc. for Citywide Concrete Repairs for Fiscal Years 2017-18, PW18-07 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Award a construction contract to EBS General Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $301,290, for citywide concrete repairs for Fiscal Years 2017-18, PW 18-07; 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders up to 10% of the contract amount, which is approximately $30,129. 12. Adopt A Resolution Determining that the Emergency Repairs Authorized by Resolution 2019-11 Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050 Have Been Completed and There is No Longer a Need For the Emergency Authorization Recommendation RECESS: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA THAT THE ACTIONS AUTHORIZED BY RESOLUTION NO. 2019-11 FOR THE EMERGENCY REPAIR OF DAMAGED ROADS INCLUDING YNEZ ROAD, OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, JEFFERSON AVENUE, DEL REY ROAD, CHANDLER DRIVE, SUZI LANE, SHREE ROAD, SKYLINE DRIVE, LIEFER ROAD, NICOLAS ROAD, PECHANGA PARKWAY, REDHAWK PARKWAY, AND THE TEMECULA PARKWAY ON -RAMP TO INTERSTATE 15-SOUTH PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 22050 HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THERE IS NO LONGER A NEED FOR THE EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION At 7:46 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting. At 7:50 PM, the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL RITSINESS 14. Introduce Ordinance Amending Portions of the Temecula Municipal Code to Add Definitions and Make Minor Clarifications and Typographical Corrections Recommendation: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. l 9-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 1, 8, 10, 15, 16 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD DEFINITIONS, MAKE MINOR POLICY CLARIFICATIONS AND MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3). Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart. The electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. 15. Adopt an Urgency Ordinance Amending the Temecula Municipal Code to Add a New Section Pertaining to Small Wireless Facilities Within the Public Right -Of -Way and a Resolution Establishing a Design Policy for Small Wireless Facilities Recommendation That the City Council 1. Adopt an urgency ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 19-03 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17.40 OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT CODE (TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND ANTENNA ORDINANCE) TO ADD A NEW SECTION 17.40.260, SMALL CELL WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 36934, 36937, AND 65858 DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Schwank. The electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A POLICY IMPLEMENTING DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Rahn. The electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 16. Police Department Monthly Report COMMISSION REPORTS PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT City attorney reported that the case of the County of Santa Cruz, et al. v. Bureau of Cannabis Control, et al. has been filed in the Fresno County Superior Court. City Council authorized the joining of this litigation at the March 12, 2019 City Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT At 8:09 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 23, 2019, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] ITEM NO . 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Fiscal Services Manager Jada Shafe, Accounting Technician II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $6,874,960.91. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of April, 2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 19- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 03/28/2019 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/04/2019 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/04/2019 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 1,169,190.41 5,173,016.69 532,753.81 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/23/2019 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 6,874,960.91 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 2,955,095.06 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 24,189.92 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 6,991.67 170 MEASURE A FUND 448.74 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 242,148.92 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 74,291.47 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,089.47 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 4,118.81 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 15,112.71 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 1,157,661.42 300 INSURANCE FUND 537.40 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 22,164.41 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 58,934.89 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 11,684.49 340 FACILITIES 34,114.86 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,633,028.54 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 105.89 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 105.66 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 105.89 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 105.89 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 105.89 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 105.89 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 237.30 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 2,355.31 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 1,704.31 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 2,027.61 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 338.80 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 1,600.64 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 995.45 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 612.29 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 9,389.78 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 112.57 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 406.23 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 91.40 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 4,865.89 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 2,085.10 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 588.83 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 471.55 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 1,203.99 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 98.52 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 4,994.95 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 3,672.95 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 16,797.86 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 13,927.41 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 182.64 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 371.06 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 7,738.34 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 1,976.81 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 123.47 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 353.74 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 10,562.51 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 143.90 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 9,928.00 $ 6,342,207.10 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 292,328.55 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 646.05 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 4,613.08 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 126,010.07 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 454.94 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,296.27 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 329.84 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 1,921.80 300 INSURANCE FUND 735.94 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 735.99 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 33,376.09 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 3,426.75 340 FACILITIES 8,004.03 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 104.52 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 104.71 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 104.52 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 104.52 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 104.52 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 104.52 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 239.27 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 2.00 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 28.37 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 17.49 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 3.97 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 28.48 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 12.54 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 14.68 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 139.46 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 2.38 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 7.95 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 2.87 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 87.32 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 18.12 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 6.83 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 6.38 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 20.14 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 0.59 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 83.49 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 43.56 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 111.11 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 189.35 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 3.33 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 6.59 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 153.88 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 39.04 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 2.19 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 6.61 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 224.17 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 3.33 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 56,741.61 TOTAL BY FUND: 532,753.81 $ 6,874,960.91 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 5972 03/20/2019 007282 AMAZON COM INC, SYNCB/AMAZON 5973 03/21/2019 007282 AMAZON COM INC, SYNCB/AMAZON 5974 03/08/2019 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 5975 03/25/2019 007282 AMAZON COM INC, SYNCB/AMAZON 5976 03/15/2019 016564 IMPACT TELECOM 5977 03/19/2019 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 5978 03/21/2019 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 5979 03/21/2019 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 5980 03/21/2019 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 5981 03/22/2019 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 5982 03/20/2019 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Description SUPPLIES:SPECIAL EVENTS SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LI BRARY BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LI BRARY BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY PADLOCKS FOR MOTOR HELMETS: POL OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC RECHARGABLE LED ROAD FLARES:CAF SUPPLIES:GLOBAL CITIZENS VITICULTURE EOC patio furniture SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE MISC ITEMS:TEAM PACE EMP EVENTS MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CM VARIOUS JAN BILLS 3037063-BFLD STG RD MISC SUPPLIES:CITY CLERK FEB 800 SERVICES: CIVIC CENTER MAR INTERNET SVCS-EOC MAR INTERNET SVCS-CHILDREN'S MUSEUM MAR INTERNET SVCS-LIBRARY MAR INTERNET SVCS-LIBRARY MAR INTERNET SVCS-EXTERNAL DMV LINE MAR INTERNET SVCS-28922 PUJOL ST Amount Paid Check Total 49.02 11.98 104.13 17.61 34.21 170.97 27.02 539.94 262.15 30.44 15.88 27.57 13.98 30.98 9.99 51.48 199.52 19.99 145.93 6,281.32 21.74 57.42 144.23 128.98 11.14 11.14 109.84 586.77 954.88 807.91 6,281.32 21.74 57.42 144.23 128.98 11.14 11.14 109.84 586.77 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 5983 03/20/2019 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 5984 03/20/2019 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 5985 03/25/2019 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 5986 03/25/2019 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 5987 03/27/2019 007282 AMAZON COM INC, SYNCB/AMAZON 5988 03/12/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5989 03/12/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5990 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5991 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5992 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5993 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5994 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5995 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5996 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MAR INTERNET SVCS-32380 DEER 586.77 586.77 HOLLOW WAY MAR INTERNET SVCS-41845 6TH ST 586.77 586.77 MAR INTERNET SVCS- 40820 586.77 586.77 WINCHESTER RD MAR INTERNET SVCS-32364 54.99 54.99 OVERLAND TRL SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE 41.97 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: HR 25.53 RECREATION SUPPLIES:CRC 321.10 BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 43.24 SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE 198.00 SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE 12.99 SUPPLIES:TVM AND ACE 91.09 BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 362.04 EOC patio furniture 729.90 1,825.86 FEB 101-525-1560-6 27415 780.21 780.21 ENTERPRISE CIR FEB 125-244-2108-3 30600 PAUBA RD 1,206.39 1,206.39 FEB 133-040-7373-0 43210 BUS PARK 20.17 20.17 DR FEB 060-293-3315-7 28922 PUJOL ST 103.39 103.39 FEB 028-025-1468-3 41375 MCCABE CT 126.40 126.40 FEB 101-525-0950-0 28816 PUJOL ST 169.10 169.10 FEB 181-383-8881-6 28314 MERCEDES 322.19 322.19 ST FEB 129-582-9784-3 43230 BUS PARK 334.73 334.73 DR FEB 196-025-0344-3 42081 MAIN ST 387.47 387.47 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 5997 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5998 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5999 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6000 03/13/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6001 03/19/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6002 03/08/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6003 03/08/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6004 03/08/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6005 03/08/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6006 03/08/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6007 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6008 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6009 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6010 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6011 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6012 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6013 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total FEB 021-725-0775-4 41845 6TH ST 483.59 483.59 FEB 026-671-2909-8 42051 MAIN ST 558.00 558.00 FEB 091-024-9300-5 30875 RANCHO 612.36 612.36 VISTA FEB 129-535-4236-7 41000 MAIN ST 3,076.67 3,076.67 FEB 117-188-6393-6 32131 S LOOP RD 387.89 387.89 FEB 2-41-048-2012 30498 TEM PKWY 98.45 98.45 FEB 2-35-664-9053 29119 MARGARITA 603.49 603.49 RD FEB 2-25-393-4681 41951 MORAGA RD 1,030.36 1,030.36 FEB 2-30-520-4414 32781 TEM PKWY 1,038.64 1,038.64 FEB 2-35-403-6337 41375 MCCABE CT 1,199.65 1,199.65 FEB 2-29-657-2332 45538 REDWOOD 25.01 25.01 RD FEB 2-29-953-8447 31738 WOLF 25.01 25.01 VALLEY RD FEB 2-39-732-3171 41997 MARGARITA 26.49 26.49 RD FEB 2-29-953-8249 46497 WOLF CREEK 28.84 28.84 DR FEB 2-29-953-8082 31523 WOLF 29.83 29.83 VALLEY RD FEB 2-35-707-0010 33451 S HWY 79 53.30 53.30 FEB 2-30-220-8749 45850 N WOLF 374.71 374.71 CREEK DR Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 6014 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6015 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6016 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6017 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6018 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6019 03/11/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6020 03/12/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6021 03/12/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6022 03/12/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6023 03/12/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6024 03/12/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6025 03/19/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6026 03/19/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 6027 03/19/2019 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6028 03/28/2019 007282 AMAZON COM INC, SYNCB/AMAZON 194472 03/28/2019 020724 79 FIELD HOCKEY INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total FEB 2-29-223-8607 42035 2ND ST 452.18 452.18 FEB 2-31-404-6020 28771 OLD TOWN 523.87 523.87 FRONT FEB2-29-295-3510 32211 WOLF VALLEY 805.35 805.35 RD FEB 2-31-536-3226 28690 MERCEDES 1,592.82 1,592.82 ST 2-00-397-5067 FEB 40499 CALLE 2,278.19 2,278.19 MEDUSA FEB 2-28-629-0507 30600 PAUBA RD 4,847.50 4,847.50 FEB 2-31-936-3511 46488 PECHANGA 50.32 50.32 PKWY FEB 2-40-380-2424 40750 88.10 88.10 BUTTERFIELD STG FEB 2-29-657-2563 42902 200.81 200.81 BUTTERFIELD STG FEB 2-27-560-0625 32380 2,580.32 2,580.32 DEERHOLLOW WAY FEB 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS 73,917.03 73,917.03 LOCATIONS FEB 2-29-974-7899 26953 YNEZ RD 203.74 203.74 FEB 2-30-608-9384 28582 HARVESTON 416.05 416.05 DR FEB 098-255-9828-8 29119 MARGARITA 200.82 200.82 RD MISC SUPPLIES:CITY CLERK 78.44 MOBILE WHITEBOARD, FRAMES:GIS 20.09 98.53 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,638.13 2,638.13 Page:4 apChkLst 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 194473 03/28/2019 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT PW STREET MAINT: ASPHALT 500.02 SUPPLIES PW STREET MAINT: ASPHALT SUPPLIES 879.96 PW STREET MAINT: ASPHALT SUPPLIES 1,049.78 2,429.76 194474 03/28/2019 005037 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH RETENTION RELEASE: PW18-09 68,815.94 68,815.94 INC SLURRY 194475 03/28/2019 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES PHLEBOTOMY SVCS:TEMECULA 165.00 AFN POLICE PHLEBOTOMY SVCS:TEMECULA POLICE 440.00 605.00 194476 03/28/2019 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO MAR WTR SVCS: POLICE 56.57 56.57 194477 03/28/2019 019709 BAGDASARIAN, NADYA REIMB: TEAM PACE SUPPLIES 122.10 REIMB: TEAM PACE SUPPLIES 383.33 505.43 194478 03/28/2019 011954 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 711.83 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 8.56 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 19.05 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 42.65 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 499.38 BOOK COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 39.22 1,320.69 194479 03/28/2019 013482 BAS SECURITY SECURITY SVCS: CITY FACILITIES 1,161.00 SECURITY SVCS: CITY FACILITIES 2,443.15 SECURITY SVCS: CITY FACILITIES 129.00 3,733.15 194480 03/28/2019 010469 BOZONELOS,ROBERT ART OFF THE WALLSWUSICAL 4/5/19 250.00 250.00 194481 03/28/2019 020568 CALIFORNIA WATERS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SVCS: 138,694.29 138,694.29 DEVELOPMENT PW18-02 194482 03/28/2019 016688 CALIFORNIA WATERSHED ENG DSGN SVCS: PW11-10 PALA PARK 1,369.30 1,369.30 CORP, DBA CWE 194483 03/28/2019 018828 CASC ENGINEERING AND, PERMIT COMPLIANCE SVCS: LAND 1,992.50 1,992.50 CONSULTING INC DEV 194484 03/28/2019 021149 CHANDY, MIRNA REFUND: CREDIT ON ACCT FOR 101.75 101.75 WONDERS CAMP 194485 03/28/2019 018956 CHANNING BETE COMPANY CPR SUPPLIES - MEDIC 3,917.80 3,917.80 INC 194486 03/28/2019 021022 CHARGEPOINT INC ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING 109,531.83 109,531.83 STATIONS:PW18- Pages apChkLst 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 194487 03/28/2019 020025 CIVIL SOURCE INC NOV-JAN CONSTR MGMT SVCS: 18,320.00 PW15-11 JAN CONSTR MGMT SVCS: PW13-09 7,360.00 25,680.00 194488 03/28/2019 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS APR-JUN ALARM SYS MONITORING: 5,910.00 5,910.00 VARI DEPTS 194489 03/28/2019 021146 CONGREGATION BNAI CHAIM, FY 18/19 COMMUNITY SVC FUNDING 1,000.00 1,000.00 OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS 194490 03/28/2019 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKING 171.87 171.87 DIST GARAGE 194491 03/28/2019 010747 CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN, REFUND: SEC DEPOSIT CRC 3/17/19 150.00 150.00 BAPTIST CHURCH 194492 03/28/2019 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 140.00 140.00 194493 03/28/2019 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA491 SUPPLIES:TEEN EGG HUNT 3,785.49 SUPPLIES: INCLUSIVE SVCS 204.59 SUPPLIES:GLOBAL CITIZENS PRGM 85.12 MISC SUPPLIES: TCC 112.27 4,187.47 194494 03/28/2019 014501 COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL HVAC REPAIRS: CIVIC CTR 155.00 SYSTEMS HVAC REPAIRS: CIVIC CTR 345.00 500.00 194495 03/28/2019 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & PLUMBING SVCS: HARVESTON LAKE 500.00 HVAC INC PLUMBING SVCS - STA 84 2,290.00 VARIOUS REPAIRS: PBSP 5,200.00 7,990.00 194496 03/28/2019 016208 CREATIVE MAD SYSTEMS, DBA Exhibit repairs:Pennypickle's Workshop 24,350.00 24,350.00 MAD SYSTEMS INC 194497 03/28/2019 020105 CUMBERBATCH, JAMAL TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 431.20 CREDIT: TAX WITHHOLDING CASE 18631 -107.80 323.40 194498 03/28/2019 014580 DANCE THEATRE COLLECTIVE, Theater Performance: APR 6, 2019 5,000.00 5,000.00 OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 194499 03/28/2019 014580 DANCE THEATRE COLLECTIVE, STTLMNT.DANCEXCHANGE 3/19/19 140.00 140.00 OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 194500 03/28/2019 001233 DANS FEED AND SEED INC MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 13.99 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 20.81 34.80 194501 03/28/2019 012600 DAVID EVANS AND ENG SVCS: PW 08-04 SANTA 9,067.96 9,067.96 ASSOCIATES INC GERTRUDIS Pagefi apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 194502 03/28/2019 002990 DAVID TURCH AND JAN '19 FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS ASSOCIATES 194503 03/28/2019 008289 DAVIS, MELISSA REIMB: AOAP CONFERENCE 2/24-3/1/19 194504 03/28/2019 020648 DG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS 2 CITYWIDE SURVEILLANCE PROJ: INFO INC, CONVERGINT TECH TECHNOLOGIES 194505 03/28/2019 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WORKS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREETS M/ FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI 194506 03/28/2019 012747 EMERGENCY LIGHTING PREV MAINT: EMERGENCY LIGHTING EQUIPMENT, SERVICE SYSTEM COMPANY INC DBA: 194507 03/28/2019 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE FEB CEQAANALYSIS: TV HOSPITAL ASSOC 194508 03/28/2019 015090 EVAPCO PRODUCTS INC, DBA MAR CIVIC CTR: CONDENSER H2O DOLPHIN WATERCARE SYS MAINT 194509 03/28/2019 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC MAR LDSCP MAINT SVC: VARI PARKS MAR LDSCP MAINT: FACILITIES MAR LNDSCP MAINT SRVC:VAR PARKS MAR LDSCP MAINT: LEVEL C SLOPES MAR LDSCP MAINT: LEVEL C SLOPES 194510 03/28/2019 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 3/7-3/8 EXP MAIL SVCS; CLERK & CIP 194511 03/28/2019 010804 FEHR & PEERS FEB OLD TOWN PARKING STUDY:PLANNING 194512 03/28/2019 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103 194513 03/28/2019 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD CUMBERBATCH, JAMAL - CASE# 1863175 Amount Paid Check Total 3,500.00 3,500.00 969.48 969.48 148, 848.00 148, 848.00 45.06 1,291.67 1,020.30 1,055.80 3,668.88 1,250.00 1,250.00 445.50 445.50 618.30 618.30 57,149.37 12,582.63 20,497.82 23,981.43 38,671.35 152,882.60 00141 99M.11i 1,400.00 1,400.00 775.87 775.87 107.80 107.80 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 194514 03/28/2019 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS OFC SUPPLIES: FOC INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PUBLIC WORKS MISC OFC SUPPLIES: STA 95 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: STA 95 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PUBLIC WORKS MISC OFC SUPPLIES:CODE ENFORCEM 194515 03/28/2019 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC STTLMNT: CLASSICS AT THE MERC: SOCIETY, DBA CA CHAMBER MARCH ORCHESTRA 194516 03/28/2019 014173 GOLDSTAR ASPHALT VAR PARKS: PAVING SUPPLIES & PRODUCTS PRODUCTS 194517 03/28/2019 016552 GONZALES, MARK ALLEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 194518 03/28/2019 003342 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, FY 18/19 COMMUNITY SVC FUNDING INLAND VALLEY INC Amount Paid Check Total 54.34 127.94 115.56 39.35 9.30 198.58 545.07 532.00 532.00 399.75 399.75 600.00 600.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 194520 03/28/2019 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET 65.23 MAINT MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET MAINT 136.48 MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET MAINI 92.11 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 16.45 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 408.27 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 44.41 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 12.76 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 31.50 MAINT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 125.41 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 41.85 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 130.49 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR PARKING 22.80 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 19.99 Small tools & equip:harveston park 55.42 Misc. small tools & equip: pw traffic 49.95 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 21.71 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 29.65 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 145.12 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS -55.42 MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC 46.31 MAINT SUPPLIES: TCC 47.85 MAINT SUPPLIES: TCC 10.85 MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 104.39 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 18.47 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 18.93 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 36.68 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 47.64 MAINT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 184.86 MAINT SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 19.18 MAINT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 2.45 MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 32.33 MAINT SUPPLIES: THEATER 21.73 MAINT SUPPLIES: THEATER 126.19 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 391.37 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 6.50 MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 53.66 MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 32.57 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 66.24 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS -2.65 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 9.77 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 100.00 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 24.38 MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC 8.66 MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC 16.28 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 36.87 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 14.85 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 38.15 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 46.39 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 26.41 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 33.44 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 87.58 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 18.36 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 36.72 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 8.40 MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 130.49 MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 35.45 MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 44.96 MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 6.53 MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 13.58 MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 23.90 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 32.33 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS: PW 14.87 EQUIPMENT: PREV 71.18 MAINT SUPPLIES: FOC 243.51 VAR TOOLS & EQUIPMENT:TVM &ACE 6.50 MAINT SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 222.94 HARDWARE SUPPLIES: STA 84 11.95 MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET MAINI 760.16 MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET MAINI 18.10 MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS 30.43 4,832.87 194521 03/28/2019 012748 HARDY AND HARPER INC SANTIAGO RD:REMOVE/REPLACE 25,160.00 25,160.00 ASPHALT 194522 03/28/2019 002109 HD SUPPLY CONSTR. SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET 212.06 LTD, DBA HDS WHITE CAP MAINT CONSTT MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET MAINT 229.82 441.88 194523 03/28/2019 020698 HICKS AND HARTWICK INC ENG PLAN CK SVCS: PW 1,500.00 ENG PLAN CK SVCS: PW 6,700.00 8,200.00 194524 03/28/2019 010210 HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 96.34 96.34 194525 03/28/2019 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT FEB COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR: 5,380.32 SOLUTIONS CITYWIDE FEB COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR: CIT 695.03 6,075.35 194526 03/28/2019 011841 JOE RHODES MAINTENANCE, FUEL PUMP - STA 84 1,444.57 1,444.57 SERVICE INC 194527 03/28/2019 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES ENG PLAN CK & REVIEW: PW 6,580.00 6,580.00 194528 03/28/2019 001091 KEYSER MARSTON FEB AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2,404.38 2,404.38 ASSOCIATES INC ANALYSIS:PLNG Page:10 apChkLst 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 11 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 194529 03/28/2019 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC CRC POOL: VARIOUS PARTS 885.17 885.17 194530 03/28/2019 017118 KRACH BREE B, DBA JIMMY MOORE PLAQUE 3,103.48 TEMECULA TROPHY & DES CREDIT: TAX WITHHOLDING CASE 60301 -775.87 2,327.61 194531 03/28/2019 021150 LAWA, LOAN REFUND:CREDIT ON ACCT: BIGFOOT'S 60.00 60.00 ART 194532 03/28/2019 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDYAND FEB HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00017 3,731.50 WHITMORE FEB HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 560.00 4,291.50 194533 03/28/2019 011145 LODATO JILL CHRISTINE, DBA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 274.40 274.40 THE PARTY MOM 194534 03/28/2019 013982 M C I COMM SERVICE MAR XXX-0714 GEN USAGE:PD MALL 35.42 ALARM MAR XXX-0346 GENERAL USAGE 33.96 69.38 194535 03/28/2019 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA SIGN REPLACEMENT 1,138.30 1,138.30 ATHACO INC SUPPLIES:STREETS 194536 03/28/2019 004141 MAINTEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES: VARI FACILITIES 1,750.66 1,750.66 194537 03/28/2019 011920 MASTER CONCEPTS LLC, DBA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 367.50 MASTER SPORTS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 367.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 588.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 514.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 505.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,084.30 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 294.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 735.00 4,456.20 194538 03/28/2019 021153 MCCORMICK, WILLIAM REFUND: VIOLATION DISMISSAL 330.00 330.00 #325569 194539 03/28/2019 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC FEB CDBGADMIN SVCS: PLANNING 4,295.00 JAN CDBG ADMIN SVCS: PLANNING 5,722.50 10,017.50 194540 03/28/2019 015955 METRO FIRE AND SAFETY INC HOOD INSPECTIONS: MPSC 205.00 HOOD INSPECTIONS: PBSP 205.00 HOOD INSPECTIONS: CRC 205.00 615.00 194541 03/28/2019 018314 MICHAEL BAKER CIVIL ENG & DSGN SVCS: PW18-04 1,493.20 1,493.20 INTERNATIONAL BIKE TRAC Page:11 apChkLst 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 12 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 194542 03/28/2019 020907 MICHELLE MEDINA, DBA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 617.40 MICHELLE Q MEDINA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 480.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 784.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 705.60 2,587.20 194543 03/28/2019 004951 MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING WELDING SVCS: VARI PARKS 2,050.00 2,050.00 INC 194544 03/28/2019 013827 MIKO MOUNTAINLION INC VIA LOBO CHANNEL: STORM 29,900.00 CLEAN-UP OVERLAND DR & ENTERPRISE REPAIRS 15,500.00 45,400.00 194545 03/28/2019 012962 MILLER MISTY, DBA BOOT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 239.40 239.40 CAMP WITH A KICK 194546 03/28/2019 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: VARIOUS 251.55 INC PARKS electrical supplies: various parks— 383.05 VARIOUS POOLS: ELECTRICAL SUPPLIE 97.95 VARIOUS POOLS: ELECTRICAL SUPPLIE 36.71 769.26 194547 03/28/2019 001868 MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 315.00 315.00 ANN 194548 03/28/2019 001323 NESTLE WATERS NORTH 1/23-2/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: CRC 122.23 122.23 AMERICA, DBA READYREFRESH 194549 03/28/2019 018402 NEWSMINDED INC NEWSPAPER DELIVER SERVICE:MPSC 118.75 118.75 194550 03/28/2019 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS APR-JUN'19ASSN DUES 3561 #16: FV 522.03 PARK APR-JUN'19ASSN DUES 3561 #17: FV 485.16 APR-JUN'19ASSN DUES 3561 #20: FV 659.17 APR-JUN '19 ASSN DUES 3561 #19: FV 634.10 2,300.46 194551 03/28/2019 000209 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC, CREDIT ON ACCOUNT: FIRE -143.55 DBA CROP PRODUCTION SRVCS EQUIPM REPAIR: STA 12 91.92 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 49.59 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 782.60 780.56 194552 03/28/2019 020936 OFFICE RELIEF INC ERGONOMIC SUPPLIES:HR 377.14 377.14 194553 03/28/2019 019851 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC PRGS PMT #21 S1:I-15/SR 79 S ULT 90,403.87 90,403.87 INTRCHG 194554 03/28/2019 001999 PITNEY BOWES 3/16/19-6/15/19 POSTAGE - STA 84 77.48 77.48 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 194555 03/28/2019 021152 POST, KRISTEN REIMB: AOAP CONFERENCE 2/24-3/1/19 194556 03/28/2019 021151 QUALITY CUSTOM POOLS INC REFUND:CANCELLED PERMIT 31348 HICKORY LN 194557 03/28/2019 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEAN-UP MANAGEMENT HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEAN-UP 3) HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEAN-UP 3) HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEAN-UP 3) HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEAN-UP 2) 194558 03/28/2019 021074 RESPONSIBLE MEDICAL, TB TESTING FOR EMPLOYEES:HR SOLUTIONS CORP 194559 03/28/2019 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR, FEB'19 PRKG CITATION CONTROLLER ASSESSMENTS 194560 03/28/2019 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW PATROL SRVCS:ROD RUN 3/1-2/19 STN 194561 03/28/2019 012251 ROTH, DONALD J TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 194562 03/28/2019 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION -TRIBUNE FEB PUBLIC NTCS:PLNG/CITY CLERK/PW 194563 03/28/2019 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PHOTOGRAPHY SRVCS: CITY PRESTON COUNCIL PHOTOGRAPHY SRVCS: CANCER TASK PHOTOGRAPHY SRVCS: CITY COUNCIL 194564 03/28/2019 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 3/21/19 194565 03/28/2019 000645 SMART AND FINAL INC SUPPLIES:CRC TEEN ZONE 194566 03/28/2019 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE O.T.STOREFRONT OFFICE AND BUILDING SUPPLIESWRC OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE O.T.STOREFF OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE OFFICE AND BUILDING SUPPLIES:MRC 194567 03/28/2019 006145 STENO SOLUTIONS FEB TRANSCRIPTION TRANSCRIPTION, SRVCS INC SRVCS:TEMECULA POLICE Amount Paid Check Total 44.84 44.84 79.74 79.74 4,455.00 2,970.00 2,390.00 975.00 6,040.00 16,830.00 850.00 850.00 2,658.50 2,658.50 17,707.19 17,707.19 378.00 126.00 504.00 1,061.23 1,061.23 150.00 150.00 25.00 325.00 381.50 381.50 266.11 266.11 7.06 331.82 174.30 309.57 238.62 1,061.37 249.30 249.30 Page:13 apChkLst 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 14 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 194568 03/28/2019 016262 STEVE ADAMIAK GOLF TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 166.60 INSTRUCTION, AKA STEVEN L ADAMIAK TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 378.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 292.60 837.20 194569 03/28/2019 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS AND REPAIR WINDOW: STA 92 250.00 250.00 MIRROR, COMPANY INC 194570 03/28/2019 012789 STUART, JENNIFER SARAH TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 5,840.33 5,840.33 194571 03/28/2019 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS VEH REPAIR & MAINT:POLICE 291.04 LLC VEH REPAIR & MAINT:POLICE 233.02 524.06 194572 03/28/2019 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON PLUMBING SUPPILES: VARIOUS 398.68 COMPANY PARKS PLUMBING SUPPILES: VARIOUS PARKS 7.43 PLUMBING SUPPILES: VARIOUS PARKS 18.65 424.76 194573 03/28/2019 020967 TESLA REFUND: CANCELLED PERMIT 32477 122.88 122.88 CERVIN 194574 03/28/2019 012344 TRANSPORTATION CONCEPTS SHUTTLE SERVICES:ROD RUN 3/2/19 2,550.00 2,550.00 194575 03/28/2019 010169 UNITED TOWING SERVICE INC TOWING SERVICES: TEMECULA 435.75 435.75 POLICE 194576 03/28/2019 020963 UPTOWN TEMECULAAUTO FEB VEHICLE DETAILING SRVCS: TEM 16.00 16.00 SPA LLC POLICE 194577 03/28/2019 005805 URISA GIS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY 10/21-25 1,200.00 1,200.00 A.M. 194578 03/28/2019 020275 WALLACE & ASSOC 2/4-3/3 SRVCS:TEM.PARK & RIDE 06-09 1,968.00 CONSULTING INC 12/31-2/3 SRVCS:TEM.PARK & RIDE 06-0! 5,406.00 7,374.00 194579 03/28/2019 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES:VAR CITY FACS 2,598.27 2,598.27 194580 03/28/2019 003730 WEST COASTARBORISTS INC 2/16-28/19 TREE MAINT:VAIL RANCH 2,513.55 2/16-28/19 TREE MAINT:HARVESTON 1,137.40 2/16-28/19 TREE MAINT:CROWNE HILL 9,660.00 2/16-28/19 TREE MAINT:VILLAGES GROV 1,564.00 2/16-28/19 TREE MAINT:CITY R-O-W 1,297.00 16,171.95 194581 03/28/2019 020511 WEST COAST TRAINING TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,848.00 1,848.00 CENTER 194582 03/28/2019 013286 WEST SAFETY SERVICES INC MAR ENTERPRISE 911 SVC: IT 300.00 300.00 Page:14 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 194583 03/28/2019 021148 WEX BANK 194584 03/28/2019 005118 WILLCOX, GWEN (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 2/7/19-3/6/19 FUEL USAGE:POLICE 429.37 429.37 REIMB: AOAP CONFERENCE 1,462.20 1,462.20 2/24-3/1/19 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,169,190.41 Page:15 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 16 03/28/2019 9:05:46AM CITY OF TEMECULA 169 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,169,190.41 Page:16 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 6029 03/28/2019 018098 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT WORKERS COMP CLAIM FUNDS INC 6030 04/04/2019 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT SUPPORT 6031 04/04/2019 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA FSA REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT THE ADVANTAGE GROUP 6032 04/04/2019 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 303355 PAYMENT 6033 04/04/2019 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAXES PAYMENT 6034 04/04/2019 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL TAXES PAYMENT 6035 04/04/2019 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 6036 04/04/2019 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT SOLUTION 6037 04/04/2019 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PERS HEALTH PAYMENT PREMIUM PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 6038 04/04/2019 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT RETIREMENT) 6039 03/15/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-31-031-2590 28301 RANCHO CAL 6040 03/15/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-39-043-8521 29028 OT FRONT ST 6041 03/15/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-39-737-1063 42061 MAIN ST 6042 03/15/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-36-531-7916 44205 MAIN ST 6043 03/15/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-29-458-7548 32000 RANCHO CAL 6044 03/15/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-20-798-3248 42081 MAIN ST 6045 03/15/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-10-331-2153 28816 PUJOL ST Amount Paid Check Total 20,000.00 20,000.00 899.07 899.07 17,536.13 17,536.13 12,127.68 12,127.68 23,462.49 23,462.49 80,057.09 80,057.09 2,591.30 2,591.30 12,574.80 12,574.80 126,124.46 0.00 126,124.46 104, 532.34 104, 532.34 19.21 19.21 24.89 24.89 39.74 39.74 108.15 108.15 245.01 245.01 993.30 993.30 1,247.50 1,247.50 Page:1 apChkLst 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 6046 03/15/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-27-805-3194 42051 MAIN ST 2,957.51 2,957.51 6047 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-30-066-2889 30051 RANCHO 22.92 22.92 VISTA 6048 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-36-122-7820 31777 DE PORTOLA 24.83 24.83 RD 6049 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-25-350-5119 45602 REDHAWK 27.44 27.44 PKWY 6050 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-40-765-3021 28916 PUJOL ST 71.45 71.45 6051 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-29-479-2981 31454 TEM PKWY 79.22 79.22 6052 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-40-765-3179 28922 PUJOL ST 80.28 80.28 6053 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-41-394-3267 46899 REDHAWK 117.94 117.94 PKWY 6054 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-02-351-5281 30875 RANCHO 3,104.23 3,104.23 VISTA RD 6055 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-05-791-8807 31587 TEM PKWY 9,216.78 9,216.78 6056 03/18/2019 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-36-171-5626 BUTTERFIELD STG 24,614.61 24,614.61 RD 6057 04/02/2019 007282 AMAZON COM INC, MISC SUPPLIES AND TOOLS: FIRE 28.95 SYNCB/AMAZON MISC SUPPLIES AND TOOLS: FIRE 22.27 MISC SUPPLIES AND TOOLS: FIRE 188.20 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CITY MGR 24.69 MISC SUPPLIES AND TOOLS: FIRE 7.29 MISC SUPPLIES AND TOOLS: FIRE 24.02 MISC SUPPLIES:CITY CLERK 15.00 SMALL TOOLS/EQUIP - PREV 11.50 321.92 6058 03/28/2019 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS-SKATE PARK & 214.80 214.80 SEN CTR 6059 03/28/2019 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS-CITY HALL 293.98 293.98 6060 03/27/2019 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE APR INTERNET SVCS-29119 348.29 348.29 MARGARITA RD Paget apChkLst 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 6061 03/28/2019 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE APR INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST 3,430.62 3,430.62 6062 03/21/2019 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER 3000008-46855 REDHAWK PKWY 13,453.33 13,453.33 DISTRICT 6063 04/02/2019 005460 U S BANK '17 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS DEBT 1,633,028.54 1,633,028.54 SRVC PMT 194585 04/04/2019 020559 1ST RUN COMPUTER maintenance kits for scanners:info tech 5,288.00 5,288.00 SERVICES INC 194586 04/04/2019 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT PW STREET MAINT: ASPHALT 308.26 SUPPLIES PW STREET MAINT: ASPHALT SUPPLIES 444.38 752.64 194587 04/04/2019 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES PIANO TUNING/MAINT: THEATER 185.00 185.00 DBA, ALLEGRO PIANO SERVICE 194588 04/04/2019 004623 AQUA SOURCE INC POOL SUPPLIES: TES POOL 3,926.75 3,926.75 194589 04/04/2019 017149 B G P RECREATION INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 970.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 277.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 554.40 1,801.80 194590 04/04/2019 000475 B N I PUBLICATIONS INC PUBLICATION: PW - LAND DEV 205.95 205.95 194591 04/04/2019 006254 BALLET FOLKLORICO, AKA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 313.60 LORENA HANCOCK TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 294.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 78.40 686.00 194592 04/04/2019 018101 BARN STAGE COMPANY INC, STTLMNT: CABARET AT THE MERC 987.00 987.00 THE 3/31/19 194593 04/04/2019 004262 BIO TOX LABORATORIES TOXICOLOGY & LAB 456.00 SRVCS:TEMECULA PD TOXICOLOGY & LAB SRVCS:TEMECULA 524.00 TOXICOLOGY & LAB SRVCS:TEMECULA 3,174.00 4,154.00 194594 04/04/2019 018408 BOB CALLAHAN'S POOL MAR POOL/FOUNTAIN MAINT: VARI 700.00 SERVICE LOCATIONS Pool/Fountain Maint: Various Locations 950.00 1,650.00 194595 04/04/2019 020202 CAL FIRE STATE FIRE FIRE TRAINING: AMEZCUA & REHFELD 300.00 300.00 MARSHAL 194596 04/04/2019 003138 CAL MAT, DBA VULCAN ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET 174.91 174.91 MATERIALS CO MAINT Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 194597 04/04/2019 007488 CALIPER CORPORATION SUPPORT TRANSCAD STANDARD ONE YEAR 194598 04/04/2019 020549 CALLYO 2009 CORP MOBILE PHONE TECHNOLOGY APP:POLICE 194599 04/04/2019 021160 CHS EDUCATION REFUND: SEC DEPOSIT CRC 3/19/19 FOUNDATION, CHS CHEER SIDELINE 194600 04/04/2019 020201 CIRCLE OF SAFE-T INC SART EXAMS: TEMECULA POLICE SART EXAMS: TEMECULA POLICE 194601 04/04/2019 021133 CNS ENGINEERS INC ENG CONSULTANT SVCS: PW16-05 194602 04/04/2019 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS CHARITIES PAYMENT 194603 04/04/2019 004412 COMPLETE TENNIS CAMP, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS THE, CTC TENNIS, AKA KERRY LE 194604 04/04/2019 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 194605 04/04/2019 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 OFC SUPPLIES:INFO TECH 194606 04/04/2019 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & WOLF CREEK: REPLACE IRRIG HVAC INC BACKFLOW PLUMBING REPAIR: STA 84 194607 04/04/2019 020436 CRONBERG, RICHARD N TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 194608 04/04/2019 008810 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL & TRAFFIC EQUIP MAINT & REPAIR DATA SRVCS: PW 194609 04/04/2019 001233 DANS FEED AND SEED INC MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT 194610 04/04/2019 001393 DATA TICKET INC, DBA FEB'19 CITATION PROCESSING SVCS: REVENUE EXPERTS TCSD AUG '18 CITATION PROCESSING SVCS: 194611 04/04/2019 012600 DAVID EVANS AND DSGN SVCS: PW17-29 RECYCLE WTR ASSOCIATES INC PROJ 194612 04/04/2019 000609 DOUBLETREE HOTEL LODGING: STAFF TRNG: VIGIL & SHAFFER Amount Paid Check Total 1,305.00 1,305.00 2,990.00 2,990.00 200.00 200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 2,400.00 4,081.15 4,081.15 4.00 4.00 1,932.00 1,932.00 346.50 970.20 554.40 1,871.10 87.61 87.61 17,510.00 788.00 18,298.00 336.00 336.00 20,675.00 20,675.00 14.31 14.31 200.00 200.00 400.00 17,800.32 17,800.32 506.70 506.70 Page:4 apChkLst 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 194613 04/04/2019 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC 236.92 DIV FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PUBLIC WOF 108.83 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE 51.36 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE DEP 45.65 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD 621.39 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI 78.46 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE 265.68 1,408.29 194614 04/04/2019 019293 E&F PET SUPPLIES INC K-9 FOOD: TEMECULA POLICE 94.50 94.50 194615 04/04/2019 018098 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT APR 19 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN: 1,250.00 1,250.00 INC WRKRS COM 194616 04/04/2019 011202 EMH SPORTS USA INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 714.00 714.00 194617 04/04/2019 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE JUL CEQAANALYSIS:AFFORDABLE 10,768.65 ASSOC HOUSING JAN PASEO DEL SOL-PA4 EIR TIERED M 1,037.40 FEB PREPARATION OF ADDENDUM TO E 1,247.50 13,053.55 194618 04/04/2019 000164 ESGIL LLC FEB PLAN CK SVCS: BLDG & SAFETY 20,728.87 NOV PLAN CK SVCS: BLDG & SAFETY 10,713.38 31,442.25 194619 04/04/2019 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC MAR LDSCP MAINT SVC: VARI PARKS 56,130.42 irrigation repair: var landscape medians 667.19 LANDSCAPING: JRC 1,076.00 VARI LOCATIONS: IRRIGATION REPAIRS 1,339.64 BUTTERFIELD STAGE MEDIAN: LDSCP 4,300.00 VARIOUS SLOPES: IRRIGATION REPAIR; 377.09 CAMPOS VERDES: PLANT REPLACEMEP 1,170.00 65,060.34 194620 04/04/2019 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN PAYMENT 1,691.34 1,691.34 194621 04/04/2019 015330 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, OF FEB CDBG SUB -RECIPIENT: FAIR 1,601.79 1,601.79 RIVERSIDE COUNTY INC HOUSING SVC 194622 04/04/2019 019469 FALCON ENGINEERING MAR CONST MGMT SVCS: PW04-08 41,274.93 41,274.93 SERVICES 194623 04/04/2019 017736 FEAST CALIFORNIA CAFE LLC, REFRESH MENTS:ACE/AOTW 270.63 270.63 DBA CORNER BAKERY CAFE 194624 04/04/2019 010804 FEHR & PEERS OLD TOWN PARKING 3,373.10 3,373.10 STUDY:PLANNING 194625 04/04/2019 021006 FILEMAKER INC FILEMAKER LICENSING:PUBLIC 558.60 558.60 WORKS Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 194626 04/04/2019 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK AKA STTLMNT. INTO THE WOODS: 3/15-3/31 THEATRE, CO AND BALLET THEATER 194627 04/04/2019 014865 FREIZE UHLER KIMBERLY DBA, DEPARTMENT SHIRTS: FINANCE CLEAR BLUE PROMOTIONS PROMO ITEMS: PREV 194628 04/04/2019 013076 GAUDETYVONNE M, DBA YES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS YOU CAN DRAW 194629 04/04/2019 010452 GAYLORD BROS INC MUSEUM ACCESSIONING TOOLS 194630 04/04/2019 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES: FOC INC MISC. OFC SUPPLIES: CODE ENFORCED OFFICE SUPPLIES: FOC 194631 04/04/2019 003792 GRAINGER PARK MAINT: MISC SMALL TOOLS: PW PARK MAINT: MISC SMALL TOOLS: PW PARK MAINT: MISC SMALL TOOLS: PW 194632 04/04/2019 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL MAR LEASE FOR COPIERS:LIBRARY SVCS 194633 04/04/2019 003342 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, 7/1-3/28 CDBG SUB -RECIPIENT: INLAND VALLEY INC CRITICAL HO 194634 04/04/2019 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC VARIOUS TOOLS & EQUIPMENT:TVM AND ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES - STA 95 Misc. small tools & equip: pw traffic Misc. small tools & equip: pw traffic SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: BLDG & SAFETI SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: BLDG & SAFETI MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PAF MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET MAINI HARDWARE SUPPLIES - STA 95 194635 04/04/2019 014378 IMAGE DISTRIBUTION PARKING CITES: POLICE SERVICES, DBA FONTIS SOLUTIONS 194636 04/04/2019 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC 194637 04/04/2019 013703 LAKE ELSINORE VALLEY CHAMBER, OF COMMERCE 194638 04/04/2019 003975 LAWRENCE, JEFF EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS PAYMENT REGIST: SW CITY MGR MTG: ADAMS/LOWREY REIMB: CPRS CONF: 3/19-3/23 Amount Paid Check Total 16, 826.10 16.10 197.80 465.50 327.27 185.57 9.17 146.55 58.01 58.01 87.01 793.89 12,001.91 15.87 170.75 443.44 124.19 21.26 15.18 16.30 116.72 14.32 1,424.02 40.00 40.00 2,080.27 16, 826.10 213.90 465.50 327.27 341.29 203.03 793.89 12,001.91 938.03 1,424.02 40.00 40.00 2,080.27 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 194639 04/04/2019 015953 LLOYD'S DESIGNS DESIGN SVCS: TCSD 194640 04/04/2019 021161 LOPEZ, SUZANNE REIMB: RFRSHMNTS: CRIME MULTI HOUSING 194641 04/04/2019 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA SIGN REPLACEMENT SUPPLIES:PW ATHACO INC STREETS 194642 04/04/2019 017427 MATCHETT, VIVIAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 194643 04/04/2019 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC TRAFFIC SFTWR MAINT RENEWAL:PW 194645 04/04/2019 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL PAYMENT COMPANY 194646 04/04/2019 021080 METROMOTION LLC CONSULTING SRVCS: TRANSPORTATION 194647 04/04/2019 013443 MIDWEST TAPE LLC BOOKS/COLLECTIONS:LIBRARY 194648 04/04/2019 012962 MILLER MISTY, DBA BOOT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS CAMP TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 194649 04/04/2019 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY INC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 194650 04/04/2019 004040 MORAMARCO, ANTHONY J, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 194651 04/04/2019 017089 MORRIS-HOPKINS, BROOKE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 194652 04/04/2019 017861 MYTHOS TECHNOLOGY INC IT MONITORING SRVCS: TVE2 194653 04/04/2019 002925 NAPAAUTO PARTS MISC AUTO PARTS: STATION 73 MISC AUTO PARTS: STATION 73 Amount Paid Check Total 1,500.00 1,500.00 70.19 70.19 122.64 122.64 109.20 218.40 327.60 10,000.00 10,000.00 12,773.98 12,773.98 4,000.00 4,000.00 37.07 37.07 212.80 159.60 372.40 134.60 312.68 69.21 235.71 752.20 661.50 463.75 3,192.00 644.00 147.00 5,108.25 231.00 189.00 105.00 168.00 693.00 450.00 450.00 42.64 2.18 44.82 Page:? apChkLst 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 194654 04/04/2019 019252 NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE REFUND: SEC DEPOSIT CIVIC 200.00 200.00 CENTER 194655 04/04/2019 001323 NESTLE WATERS NORTH 1/23 - 2/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: PBSP 201.35 AMERICA, DBA READYREFRESH CREDIT MEMO: REMOVE PROF CLEANIP -119.98 81.37 194656 04/04/2019 018402 NEWSMINDED INC NEWSPAPER DELIVER SERVICE:MPSC 125.00 125.00 194657 04/04/2019 014391 NICHOLS, KELLIE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 196.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 441.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 441.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 441.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 416.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 416.50 2,352.00 194658 04/04/2019 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS 156.85 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS 1,017.65 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW TRAFFIC 358.94 1,533.44 194659 04/04/2019 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:FIRE 915.59 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:FIRE 326.36 CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:FIRE 194.16 1,436.11 194660 04/04/2019 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:CODE ENF 487.29 487.29 194661 04/04/2019 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PARK 145.85 145.85 RANGER 194662 04/04/2019 013198 ORTENZO-HAYES, KRISTINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 403.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 403.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 403.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 403.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 453.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 796.25 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 840.00 3,702.65 194663 04/04/2019 018461 PACIFIC PRODUCTS & BARRICADE LIGHTS:PW STREET 519.83 519.83 SERVICE LLC MAINT 194664 04/04/2019 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL PENTAIR SUBMERSIBLE 866.02 PRODUCTS INC PUMP:SPLASH PAD VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 437.56 1,303.58 194665 04/04/2019 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT 266.10 266.10 INC, DBA LEGALSHIELD 194666 04/04/2019 012904 PRO ACTIVE FIRE DESIGN MAR PLAN REVIEW SRVCS: 10,709.40 10,709.40 AND, CONSULTING PREVENTION Page:8 apChkLst 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 194667 04/04/2019 014379 PROFESSIONAL IMAGE BANNER PROGRAM:ECON DEV 38.06 ADVERTISING, DBA EXTREME SIGNSGRAPHICS ROAD TATTOOS:ROD RUN DECALS 1,903.13 NEW MALL BANNERS:ECO DEV 4,089.00 6,030.19 194668 04/04/2019 021107 PUBLIC ADVERTISING AGENCY PRINTING SRVCS:ECO DEV TVE2 637.94 637.94 INC BROCHURES 194669 04/04/2019 014494 R & R CONTROLS, INC BOILER CONTROL REPAIRS:CIVIC 522.00 522.00 CENTER 194670 04/04/2019 017648 RAHN, MATT REIMB: MTG LOBBYISTS & FED 288.52 288.52 OFFICES: 3/13 194671 04/04/2019 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER INSTALL & INSPECTION SRVC:OT 9,491.92 9,491.92 DIST-FEES SIDEWALK IM 194672 04/04/2019 000907 RANCHO TEMECULA CAR FEB VEH DETAILING SRVC:POLICE 17.99 WASH JAN VEH DETAILING SRVC:POLICE/FIRE 53.97 71.96 194673 04/04/2019 020429 REMOTE SATELLITE SYSTEMS MAR'19 SATELLITE PHONE SRVS:EOC 280.00 280.00 INT'L 194674 04/04/2019 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO FEB EMERG. RADIO RENTAL:POLICE 2,551.37 2,551.37 TECHNOLOGY 194675 04/04/2019 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 1/31/19-2/27/19 LAW ENFORCEMENT 2,244,830.13 2,244,830.13 DEPT 194676 04/04/2019 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 1/10/19 YOUTH COURT SERVICES 196.78 196.78 DEPT 194677 04/04/2019 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, RENEW PERMIT:CRC POOLS 812.00 812.00 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 194678 04/04/2019 009613 ROMINE, LARRY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 86.19 86.19 194679 04/04/2019 013579 ROPPE, DAWN REIMB:EVERY 15 MINS PRGM 128.75 128.75 194680 04/04/2019 012251 ROTH, DONALD J TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 73.50 73.50 194681 04/04/2019 004274 SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVCS:CIVIC CENTER 118.40 LOCKSMITH SRVC LOCKSMITH SRVCS:HISTORY MUSEUM 145.00 LOCKSMITH SRVCS:JRC 182.30 445.70 Page9 apChkLst 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 194682 04/04/2019 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M REIMBURSABLES PMT PER 392.96 392.96 PRESTON AGREEMENT 194683 04/04/2019 017113 SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY CHILDREN'S BOOKS:LIBRARY 375.92 375.92 PUBLISHING, 194684 04/04/2019 013376 SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES ALARM CONTROL REPAIR:CIVIC 169.00 169.00 INC, SSD SYSTEMS CENTER 194685 04/04/2019 020570 SHERIFF'S SPECIAL EVENTS ANN'LAWARDS CEREMONY 4/10 60.00 60.00 M.E./Z.S. 194686 04/04/2019 020570 SHERIFF'S SPECIAL EVENTS ANN'LAWARDS CEREMONY4/10 A. 30.00 30.00 ADAMS 194687 04/04/2019 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 3/28/19 520.00 520.00 194688 04/04/2019 013695 SHRED -IT US JV LLC, DBA: DOC SHRED SRVCS:POLICE 38.30 SHRED -IT USA LLC DOC SHRED SRVCS:CITY FACS 956.74 995.04 194689 04/04/2019 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW BANNER FRAME AND 646.50 646.50 BACKDROP:MPSC 194690 04/04/2019 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST PEST CONTROL SRVCS:PBSP 70.00 CONTROL INC PEST CONTROL SRVCS:STA 95 80.00 150.00 194691 04/04/2019 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC REFRESHMENTS:ECON DEV 92.43 WORKFORCE 3/20 REFRESHMENTS:ECON DEV WORKFOR 40.61 REFRESHMENTS:ECON DEV WORKFOR 18.12 151.16 194695 04/04/2019 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT 8,352.19 8,352.19 COMPANY 194696 04/04/2019 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE 1,189.35 1,189.35 COMPANY PAYMENT 194697 04/04/2019 020446 SURERIDE CHARTER INC, DBA TRANSPORTATION:CARLSBAD 1,086.50 1,086.50 SUN DIEGO CHARTER FLOWER FIELDS 4/ 194698 04/04/2019 013387 SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC MAR SWEEPING: PARKING GARAGE 540.00 540.00 194699 04/04/2019 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL 11/24/18-2/28/19 SRVC:F.V.PKWY 357,778.61 357,778.61 PW16-01 194700 04/04/2019 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION MEMBERSHIP DUES PAYMENT 5,265.57 5,265.57 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 194701 04/04/2019 008311 TEMECULA VALLEY ATHLETIC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS CLUB, DBA VIPER VOLLEYBALL 194702 04/04/2019 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS COMPANY PARKS 194703 04/04/2019 017415 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR REPLACE ELEVATOR PHONE:HISTORY CORP MUSEUM 194704 04/04/2019 016311 TIERCE, NICHOLAS GRAPHIC DESIGN SRVCS: THEATER 194705 04/04/2019 014001 TOM MALLOY CORP, DBA: EMERG SUPPLIES: YNEZ RD SINK TRENCH SHORING CO HOLE EMERG SUPPLIES: YNEZ RD SINK HOLE 194706 04/04/2019 016670 TOTAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS, 4/16/19-4/15/20 SUPPORT LLC RENEWAL:LIBRARY 194707 04/04/2019 013474 TOWN & COUNTRY TOWING TOWING SRVCS: TEMECULA POLICE 194708 04/04/2019 014866 TWM ROOFING, INC ROOF REPAIRS:JEFFERSON REC CENTER ROOF PREV MAINT SRVCS: CITY FACILI' 194709 04/04/2019 000161 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC IMPLEMENT & TRNG:TYLER EXECUTIME 2/28 IMPLEMENT & TRNG:TYLER EXECUTIME IMPLEMENT & TRNG:TYLER EXECUTIME 194710 04/04/2019 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE FEB'19 POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT 194711 04/04/2019 019793 URBANE CAFE TGH REFRESH M ENTS:AOTW 4/5/19 ENTERPRISES LLC 194712 04/04/2019 016859 VIGIL, ORLANDO 194713 04/04/2019 019321 VISIT TEMECULA VALLEY 194714 04/04/2019 006248 WALKER, JESSICA 194715 04/04/2019 007987 WALMART REIMB:CAMTC MEETING 3/26/19 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS:TVCVB OFFICE TENANT IMPROVEMENTS:TVCVB OFFIC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS RECREATION SUPPLIES:CRC RECREATION SUPPLIES:CRC SUPPLIES:GLOBAL CITIZENS VITICULTU SUPPLIES:AOTW AND GALLERY SUPPLII SUPPLIES:TEEN EGG HUNT Amount Paid Check Total 762.30 246.51 1,429.00 3,300.00 2,400.00 1,886.31 835.00 75.00 5,870.00 12,645.00 525.00 400.00 306.25 2,902.98 134.63 57.88 4,250.00 37,335.00 280.00 82.45 412.93 164.06 74.81 480.44 762.30 246.51 1,429.00 3,300.00 4,286.31 835.00 75.00 18, 515.00 1,231.25 2,902.98 134.63 57.88 41,585.00 280.00 1,214.69 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 194716 04/04/2019 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC TREE MAINT:VINTAGE HILLS 194717 04/04/2019 000341 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC FEB TRAFFIC ENG SRVCS:PW 194718 04/04/2019 004567 WITCHER ELECTRIC, AKA VAR ELECTRICAL TERRENCE KEVIN WITCHE REPAIRS: MARGARITA POOL 194719 04/04/2019 018871 WONDER SCIENCE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 194720 04/04/2019 021024 YANES BLANCAA, DBA DE FEB CONSULTING SRVCS:PLANNING GANGE CONSULTING DEPT Amount Paid Check Total 517.00 517.00 1,192.50 1,192.50 2,160.00 2,160.00 1,323.00 850.50 2,173.50 2,360.00 2,360.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 5,173,016.69 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 04/04/2019 9:48:54AM CITY OF TEMECULA 167 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 5,173,016.69 Page:13 ITEM NO . 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2019 PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2019. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of February 28, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2019 City of Temecula t 4714 Investments Portfolio Managment Treasury Report 41000 Main Street Management Temecula, CA -6430 Portfolio Mana g (951)6946430 Portfolio Summary February 28, 2019 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 47,981,445.19 47,981,445.19 47,981,445.19 36.66 1 1 2.290 2.321 Retention Escrow Account 1,398,992.64 1,398,992.64 1,398,992.64 1.07 1 1 0.163 0.165 Letter of Credit 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 Trust Accounts 9,508,885.34 9,508,885.34 9,508,885.34 7.26 1 1 2.150 2.180 Local Agency Investment Funds 38,003,924.01 37,967,863.11 38,003,924.01 29.03 1 1 2.359 2.392 Federal Agency Callable Securities 24,000,000.00 23,797,080.00 24,000,000.00 18.34 1,306 593 1.796 1.821 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 10,000,000.00 9,975,760.00 10,000,000.00 7.64 942 486 1.998 2.026 130,893,249.18 130,630,028.28 130,893,249.18 100.00% 312 147 2.164 2.194 Investments Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 9,214,241.43 9,214,241.43 9,214,241.43 140,107,490.61 139,844, 269.71 140,107,490.61 Total Earnings February 28 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 220,993.25 1,571,275.59 Average Daily Balance 132,412,294.61 125,532,339.08 Effective Rate of Return 2.18% 1.88% 1 1 0.000 0.000 312 147 2.164 2.194 Reporting period 02/01/2019-02/28/2019 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 04/03/2019 09:49 NIL! CP Run Date: 04/03/2019 - 09:49 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Page 1 Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2019 Average Purchas Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance a Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 233358001-6 01-2 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 263,587.50 263,587.50 263,587.50 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 233358006-6 01-2 REF RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 508,346.48 508,346.48 508,346.48 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 233358000-6 01-2 REF ST First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 351,128.68 351,128.68 351,128.68 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 276213009-6 03-02 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213008-6 03-02 IMPR First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 556,646.57 556,646.57 556,646.57 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 276213006-6 03-02 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 750,170.80 750,170.80 750,170.80 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 164741002-6 03-03 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.000 0.000 1 164741008-6 03-03IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 272,538.23 272,538.23 272,538.23 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 164741006-6 03-03RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 400.11 400.11 400.11 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 164741000-6 03-03SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 1,179,580.47 1,179,580.47 1,179,580.47 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 164742002-6 03-06 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.630 1.608 1.630 1 164742000-6 03-06SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 177,960.73 177,960.73 177,960.73 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 229462007-6 03-1 2012 RF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 2,125.36 2,125.36 2,125.36 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 229462002--6 03-1 BOND FD First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 7,331.58 7,331.58 7,331.58 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 229462009-6 03-1 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462006-6 03-1 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,227.26 17,227.26 17,227.26 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 229462000-6 03-1 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 498,460.42 498,460.42 498,460.42 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 94669921-6 03-1ACQ11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 94669911-6 03-1ACQA11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669917-6 03-1 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669916-6 03-1 RESB11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669000-6 03-1 SPTAX11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213002-6 03-2 REFU First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 7,815.00 7,815.00 7,815.00 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 276213000-6 03-2 SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 427,397.39 427,397.39 427,397.39 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 94686001-6 03-4ADMIN11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 522.20 522.20 522.20 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 94686005-6 03-4PREP11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 13.35 13.35 13.35 2.250 2.219 2.250 1 94686000-6 03-4RED11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 102,865.61 102,865.61 102,865.61 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 94686006-6 03-4RES11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 34,350.23 34,350.23 34,350.23 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 276213022-6 16-01 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 39,997.02 39,997.02 39,997.02 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 276213023-6 16-01 CAPINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 276213029-6 16-01 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213028-6 16-01 IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 6,574,381.87 6,574,381.87 6,574,381.87 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 276213026-6 16-01 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 3,185,548.82 3,185,548.82 3,185,548.82 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 276213020-6 16-01 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 1,926,870.70 1,926,870.70 1,926,870.70 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 218848001-6 2017A&B INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/09/2018 554.02 554.02 554.02 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 218848008-6 2017ABPRIORP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 206,932.24 206,932.24 206,932.24 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 218848013-2 2017B COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848000-6 2017B DS First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 26.67 26.67 26.67 2.290 2.259 2.290 1 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 04/03/2019 09:49 NL! CP Run Date: 04/03/2019 - 09:49 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2019 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchas a Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate YTM 360 YTM Days to Maturity 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 218848002-6 2017B PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 01/01/2019 396.48 396.48 396.48 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 218848009-6 2017B_PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 12,831,243.45 12,831,243.45 12,831,243.45 2.280 2.249 2.280 1 233358009-6 233358009-6 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-6 RDA-021NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434161-6 RDA-02PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886000-6 RDA-06AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886001-6 RDA06APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886010-6 RDA06BINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886011-6 RDA06BPRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.680 0.671 0.680 1 107886016-6 RDA06BRES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886020-6 RDA071NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886021-6 RDA07PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.930 0.917 0.930 1 107886028-6 RDA07PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886026-6 RDA07RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 136343008-6 RDA10APROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343018-6 RDA10BPROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343000-6 RDA10INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343001-6 RDA10PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343006-6 RDA10RSRV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2018 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.000 0.000 1 146161000-6 RDA11AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161001-6 RDA11APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669902-3 03-1 BOND3 First American Treasury 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-1 RDA 02 INT1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 146161008-3 RDA11APROJ Federated Institutional Tax Fr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1 146161006-3 RDA11ARSRV Federated Institutional Tax Fr 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-5 03-01 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669000-5 03-01SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 164742006-5 03-06 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 164742000-5 03-06 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669902-5 03-1bond fd Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686001-5 03-4 ADMIN11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94686005-5 03-4 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 04/03/2019 09:49 NL! CP Run Date: 04/03/2019 - 09:49 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Managed Pool Accounts 94686006-5 03-4 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 94669917-1 03-01-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fu 276213008-1 03-02 IMP CA Local Agency Investment Fu 164742006-1 03-06 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fu 229462007-1 03-1 2012 RE CA Local Agency Investment Fu 94669911-1 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fu 94669921-1 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fu 744727011-1 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fu 164741006-1 0303-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fu 107886028-1 RDA 07 PRO-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fu 107886026-1 RDA 07 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fu 136343018-1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fu 229462020-0 03-01 CASH USBANK 233358050-1 01-2 SPECESC U.S. Treasury Subtotal and Average Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2019 Average Purchas Balance a Par Value Market Value 0.00 n n n n n n n n n n n 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,454,198.92 15,454,198.92 319,795.24 319,795.24 784,488.14 784,488.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,481,927.01 1,481, 927.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,616.58 16,616.58 0.00 0.00 44,303,777.82 47,981,445.19 47,981,445.19 Page 3 Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 0.00 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 15,454,198.92 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 319,795.24 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 784,488.14 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 0.00 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 0.00 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 0.00 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 1,481,927.01 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 0.00 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 0.00 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 0.00 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 16,616.58 0.000 0.000 1 0.00 0.360 0.355 0.360 1 47,981,445.19 2.290 2.321 1 Retention Escrow Account NOBEL COMPANY Nobel Comp Banner Bank 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.370 0.365 0.370 1 ARMY CORPS Army Corps Union Bank 603,111.40 603,111.40 603,111.40 0.300 0.296 0.300 1 218848050-0 2002 ESCROW USBANK 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848060-0 2006AESCRO USBANK 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848070-0 2006BESCRO USBANK 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848080-0 2007ESCROW USBANK 07/01/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462020-2 03-01 ESCROW U.S. Treasury 795,881.24 795,881.24 795,881.24 0.063 0.062 0.063 1 Subtotal and Average 1,413,656.80 1,398,992.64 1,398,992.64 1,398,992.64 0.163 0.165 1 Letter of Credit 218848006-1 2017B RESER ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL COR 07/01/2018 233358006-1 01-2 REFRESI ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2018 Subtotal and Average 2.00 Trust Accounts 6746058700 PARS Pension US Bank Trust Subtotal and Average 9,357,994.82 Local Agency Investment Funds SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun Data Updated: SET_MTH: 04/03/2019 09:49 Run Date: 04/03/2019 - 09:49 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 9,508,885.34 9,508,885.34 9,508,885.34 23,348,633.93 1,819.13 9,508,885.34 23,326,479.04 1,817.40 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 9,508,885.34 2.180 2.150 2.180 9,508,885.34 2.150 2.180 23,348,633.93 2.392 2.359 2.392 1,819.13 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 1 Portfolio TEME NL! CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment # Local Agency Investment Funds SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun Subtotal and Average 40,361,066.87 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2019 Average Purchas Issuer Balance a Par Value Market Value 14,653,470.95 38,003,924.01 14,639,566.67 37,967,863.11 Page 4 Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date 14,653,470.95 2.392 2.359 2.392 1 38,003,924.01 2.359 2.392 1 Federal Agency Callable Securities 3130A4G89 01207 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/24/2015 1,000,000.00 995,230.00 1,000,000.00 1.650 1.627 1.650 207 09/24/2019 3130AAME5 01226 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/30/2017 1,000,000.00 983,070.00 1,000,000.00 2.020 1.948 1.975 1,061 01/25/2022 3130AANA2 01227 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/30/2017 1,000,000.00 988,740.00 1,000,000.00 1.750 1.726 1.750 517 07/30/2020 3130AAW38 01228 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/22/2017 1,000,000.00 999,440.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.479 1.500 1,117 03/22/2022 3130AB3N4 01231 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/28/2017 1,000,000.00 993,370.00 1,000,000.00 1.550 1.529 1.550 242 10/29/2019 3130ABYY6 01235 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/24/2017 1,000,000.00 983,950.00 1,000,000.00 1.750 1.726 1.750 726 02/24/2021 3130ACN83 01238 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/30/2017 1,000,000.00 989,230.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1.677 1.700 441 05/15/2020 3130ADFV9 01241 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/29/2018 1,000,000.00 993,910.00 1,000,000.00 2.250 2.219 2.250 700 01/29/2021 3130AFD38 01248 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/27/2018 1,000,000.00 1,002,290.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 2.959 3.000 637 11/27/2020 3134G8QB8 01219 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 03/29/2016 1,000,000.00 999,160.00 1,000,000.00 1.270 1.253 1.270 28 03/29/2019 3134G8PP8 01220 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 03/30/2016 1,000,000.00 983,840.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.661 1.684 579 09/30/2020 3134GBAB8 01229 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 03/27/2017 1,000,000.00 990,620.00 1,000,000.00 1.670 1.647 1.670 392 03/27/2020 3134GBGZ9 01232 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 04/27/2017 1,000,000.00 984,670.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.964 1.991 1,063 01/27/2022 3134GBNK4 01234 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 05/30/2017 1,000,000.00 988,900.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 455 05/29/2020 3134GBL42 01237 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 09/28/2017 1,000,000.00 985,710.00 1,000,000.00 1.670 1.647 1.670 577 09/28/2020 3134GBR95 01239 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 10/30/2017 1,000,000.00 993,940.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 243 10/30/2019 3134GSGF6 01242 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 03/15/2018 1,000,000.00 998,110.00 1,000,000.00 2.625 2.589 2.625 929 09/15/2021 3134GSMF9 01246 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 05/30/2018 1,000,000.00 1,005,820.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 2.959 3.000 1,547 05/26/2023 3136G2EC7 01205 Federal National Mtg Assn 02/27/2015 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.300 1.282 1.300 27 02/27/2019 3136G2WT0 01216 Federal National Mtg Assn 01/27/2016 1,000,000.00 990,290.00 1,000,000.00 1.450 1.430 1.450 332 01/27/2020 3136G2XH5 01217 Federal National Mtg Assn 02/24/2016 1,000,000.00 989,110.00 1,000,000.00 1.400 1.381 1.400 360 02/24/2020 3136G3CL7 01218 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/24/2016 1,000,000.00 981,720.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.401 1.420 573 09/24/2020 3136G3TE5 01221 Federal National Mtg Assn 06/29/2016 1,000,000.00 983,040.00 1,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 1.250 486 06/29/2020 3136G3X59 01222 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/23/2016 1,000,000.00 993,270.00 1,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 175 08/23/2019 3136G4ST1 01247 Federal National Mtg Assn 06/28/2018 1,000,000.00 999,650.00 1,000,000.00 2.800 2.762 2.800 850 06/28/2021 Subtotal and Average 24,928,571.43 24,000,000.00 23,797,080.00 24,000,000.00 1.796 1.821 593 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3133EGJ30 01225 3133EJT74 01249 3130A8ZV8 01223 3130ABDX1 01233 3130AC3F9 01236 3130ADEB4 01240 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/18/2016 1,000,000.00 990,130.00 1,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 1.100 262 11/18/2019 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/15/2018 1,000,000.00 1,012,360.00 1,000,000.00 3.050 3.008 3.050 990 11/15/2021 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/23/2016 1,000,000.00 992,940.00 1,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 175 08/23/2019 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/24/2017 1,000,000.00 997,530.00 1,000,000.00 1.400 1.381 1.400 84 05/24/2019 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/10/2017 1,000,000.00 994,770.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.853 1.878 180 08/28/2019 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/12/2018 1,000,000.00 992,170.00 1,000,000.00 2.125 2.096 2.125 683 01/12/2021 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 04/03/2019 09:49 NLI CP Run Date: 04/03/2019 - 09:49 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3130ADR79 01243 Federal Home Loan Bank 3130ADSJ2 01244 Federal Home Loan Bank 3130ADXUl 01245 Federal Home Loan Bank 3135GOU92 01250 Federal National Mtg Assn Subtotal and Average 10,00 Total and Average 132,41 Data Updated: SET_MTH: 04/03/2019 09:49 Run Date: 04/03/2019 - 09:49 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments February 28, 2019 Average Purchas Balance a Par Value Market Value 03/20/2018 1,000,000.00 997,380.00 03/08/2018 1,000,000.00 999,150.00 04/09/2018 1,000,000.00 997,790.00 01 /11 /2019 1,000,000.00 1, 001, 540.00 0,000.00 10,000,000.00 9,975,760.00 2,294.61 130,893,249.18 130,630,028.28 Page 5 Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date 1,000,000.00 2.300 2.268 2.300 385 03/20/2020 1,000,000.00 2.460 2.426 2.460 738 03/08/2021 1,000,000.00 2.320 2.288 2.320 314 01/09/2020 1,000,000.00 2.625 2.589 2.625 1,047 01/11/2022 10,000,000.00 1.998 2.026 486 130,893,249.18 2.164 2.194 147 Portfolio TEME NL! CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Page 6 Portfolio Details - Cash February 28, 2019 Average Purchas Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance a Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Passbook/Checking Accounts 1453718479 WORKERS BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC 07/01/2018 12,519.79 12,519.79 12,519.79 0.000 0.000 1 SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2018 3,711.00 3,711.00 3,711.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 9,190,022.64 9,190,022.64 9,190,022.64 0.000 0.000 1 SYSParking Ck PARKING CITA Union Bank of California 07/01/2018 7,988.00 7,988.00 7,988.00 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 1 Total Cash and Investments 132,412,294.61 Data Updated: SET_MTH: 04/03/2019 09:49 Run Date: 04/03/2019 - 09:49 140,107,490.61 139,844,269.71 140,107,490.61 2.164 2.194 147 Portfolio TEME NL! CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Cash and Investments Report CITY OF TEMECULA Through February 2019 Fund # Fund Name Beginning Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Total 001 GENERAL FUND $ 25,771,981.28 $ 14,043,585.25 $ 5,832,629.30 $ 33,982,937.23 002 MEASURE S FUND 2,125,269.13 2,658,632.85 252.30 4,783,649.68 100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 341,133.31 - 17.99 341,115.32 102 RMRA-ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACT 257,151.45 320,390.92 30.46 577,511.91 103 STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND 701,660.39 - 37.01 701,623.38 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 1,719,961.49 108,146.56 96.41 1,828,011.64 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 255,821.64 146,492.55 668.30 401,645.89 145 TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM 191,597.25 - 10.10 191,587.15 150 AB 2766 FUND 159,828.76 - 8.43 159,820.33 160 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES 8,547.23 8,333.37 0.89 16,879.71 161 TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND 26,192.89 - 1.38 26,191.51 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 639,189.80 842.92 19,769.97 620,262.75 170 MEASURE A FUND 3,277,028.52 280,577.96 343,001.89 3,214,604.59 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 2,196,960.74 1,635,961.54 560,999.20 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS - 321,419.86 126,048.66 195,371.20 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 239,242.17 4,134,893.45 3,954,711.63 419,423.99 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT 24,371.39 2,737.78 1.43 27,107.74 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 311,571.15 125,179.43 22,051.28 414,699.30 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 381,244.51 8,286.84 25,953.18 363,578.17 198 PUBLIC ART 30,559.17 1,398.83 1.69 31,956.31 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND 22,423,181.65 116,978.29 1,900,694.85 20,639,465.09 275 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND 272,008.26 529.97 - 272,538.23 277 CFD-RORIPAUGH 16,148,565.30 1,082.44 7.32 16,149,640.42 278 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 6,561,597.50 12,784.37 - 6,574,381.87 300 INSURANCE FUND 509,967.73 53,124.69 12,738.46 550,353.96 305 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 1,662,532.79 - 6,295.24 1,656,237.55 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 2,839,190.57 - 121,064.29 2,718,126.28 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 397,319.97 7,622.91 196,535.77 208,407.11 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 1,020,097.64 - 22,952.53 997,145.11 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 359,733.91 - 30,709.22 329,024.69 340 FACILITIES 497,057.37 49.99 76,443.13 420,664.23 350 FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND 55,159.85 - 51,500.19 3,659.66 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 13,315,715.69 29,295.48 3,940.00 13,341,071.17 381 REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST 2,426,046.39 - 4,083.66 2,421,962.73 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 91,861.66 4.84 91,856.82 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 629,005.75 1,049,089.05 520,362.62 1,157,732.18 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,768,917.26 813,198.06 402,698.54 2,179,416.78 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 97,732.29 90,509.60 42,731.86 145,510.03 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,041,312.92 1,948,837.99 970,988.13 3,019,162.78 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 368,826.23 325,904.10 159,752.32 534,978.01 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 827,911.38 764,631.98 377,396.73 1,215,146.63 478 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 3,366,714.25 3,622,833.92 1,801,875.22 5,187,672.95 501 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD - 18,734.53 5,976.38 12,758.15 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 65,852.71 21,641.79 1,925.37 85,569.13 503 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 8,320.30 24,731.39 2,275.54 30,776.15 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 483.78 3,184.06 376.55 3,291.29 505 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 3,994.88 20,462.94 1,989.13 22,468.69 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 17,591.18 13,464.52 1,155.50 29,900.20 507 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW - 8,594.49 5,970.15 2,624.34 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 22,261.74 72,715.14 6,255.58 88,721.30 509 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 23,273.31 2,621.10 183.54 25,710.87 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 6,999.21 4,918.71 498.22 11,419.70 511 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 1,453.61 1,040.31 128.48 2,365.44 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 44,099.66 48,967.50 3,875.77 89,191.39 513 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 2,988.45 17,413.91 1,889.50 18,512.86 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES - 7,713.95 797.10 6,916.85 515 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 1,401.67 4,784.75 584.94 5,601.48 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 32,846.33 18,803.45 5,665.90 45,983.88 517 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 294.37 993.05 131.68 1,155.74 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 1,135.72 49,766.34 5,449.34 45,452.72 519 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 65,218.89 28,942.27 2,647.64 91,513.52 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 101,485.81 92,214.52 7,593.99 186,106.34 521 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 112,169.77 117,183.16 12,151.62 217,201.31 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 4,275.62 2,096.49 220.19 6,151.92 523 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 12,680.24 3,918.26 381.76 16,216.74 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 3,642.05 84,972.37 11,126.27 77,488.15 525 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 34,116.98 22,914.23 2,145.60 54,885.61 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION - 985.39 94.14 891.25 527 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 3,425.40 4,682.93 435.96 7,672.37 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 331,484.12 119,166.75 10,965.67 439,685.20 529 SERVICE LEVELT"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT - 1,877.63 806.76 1,070.87 530 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 34,951.47 - 1.84 34,949.63 701 PENSION RATE STABILIZATION FUND $ 9,352,406.28 156,479.06 - $ 9,508,885.34 Grand Total: $ 124,431,661.44 $ 34,170,337.14 $ 18,757,728.87 $139,844,269.71 Journal Entries completed after January's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts / Disbursements columns. ITEM NO . 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance 19-02 Amending Portions of the Temecula Municipal Code to Add Definitions and Make Minor Clarifications and Typographical Corrections (Second Reading) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 19-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 1, 8, 10, 15, 16 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD DEFINITIONS, MAKE MINOR POLICY CLARIFICATIONS AND MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances, Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the time of introduction or passage unless a motion waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council present. Ordinance No. 19-02 was first introduced at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 9, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 19-02 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 1, 8, 10, 15, 16 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD DEFINITIONS, MAKE MINOR POLICY CLARIFICATIONS AND MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (11)(3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. City staff identified the need to make minor revisions and clarifications to portions of Title 1 (General Provisions), Title 8 (Health and Safety), Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic), Title 15 (Building and Construction), Title 16 (Subdivisions), and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code. B. The Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 Zoning of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Ordinance") on March 20, 2019, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. C. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 19-11, recommending that the City Council approve the Title 17 amendments. D. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on April 9, 2019, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. E. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the general plan. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code do not proposed any land use that is inconsistent with the Temecula General Plan. The proposed guest parking for multi -family residential developments of 13 or more units is consistent with establishing parking standards for the established residential land use designations of the General Plan. All other proposed amendments are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not propose any land use changes contrary to the adopted General Plan. 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the general plan. The proposed parking standards for multi -family residential developments are consistent with Goal 7 of the Circulation Element of the Temecula General Plan, which is to ensure "an adequate supply of private and public parking to meet the needs of residents and visitors to the City." The proposed guest parking for multi -family residential developments of 13 or more units, provides the standards needed to ensure adequate parking is available to residents and visitors to the City by establishing the parking standards based on the number of bedrooms per unit for multi- family development projects. The remaining proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not result in an contrary policy direction, or indicate an inconsistency between the Temecula Municipal Code and the adopted General Plan. 3. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. The proposed parking standards for multi -family residential developments will ensure adequate parking is available to residents and visitors to the City when future multi -family development proposals are reviewed by City staff through the entitlement process, thus maintaining the supply of adequate parking residents and visitors. The remaining proposed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code are minor clarifications and typographical edits and do not result in an inconsistency between the Temecula Municipal Code and the adopted General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, clarifications, and typographical corrections, which do not result in a significant increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and will be filed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Subsection "C" of Section 1.21.050 (Procedure for serving administrative citation.) of Chapter 1.21 (Administrative Penalties - Citations) of Title 1 (General Provisions) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text): 2 "C. The enforcement official shall attempt to obtain on the administrative citation the signature of the responsible person, or in cases in which the responsible person is a corporation or business, the signature of the person served with the administrative citation. If a responsible person or person served refuses or €al6fails to sign the administrative citation, the failure or refusal to sign shall not affect the validity of the citation or of subsequent proceedings." Section 5. Section 8.36.20 (Definitions) and Subsection "B" of Section 8.36.030 (Prohibition of smoking in public places, places of employment and other areas) of Chapter 8.36 (Smoking in Public Places) of Title 8 (Health and Safety) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended by replacing the definition of "smoking" or "to smoke" and adding location where smoking is prohibited to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text): "Smoking" or "to smoke" means inhaling. exhaling. burning. or carrvina anv lighted or heated cigar, cigarette, or pipe, or any other lighted or heated tobacco or plant product intended for inhalation, whether natural or synthetic, in any manner or in any form. "Smoking" or "to smoke" includes the use of an electronic smoking device that creates an aerosol or vapor, in any manner or in anv form. or the use of anv oral smoking device for the nurnose of circumventing the rohibition of smoking." "B. Unenclosed Places. Smoking is prohibited in the following unenclosed places except in places listed in subsection C of this section, and except in such places in which smoking is already prohibited by state or federal law in which case the state or federal law applies: 1. Places of employment; 2. Service areas; 3. Dining areas; 4. Parks, playgrounds, and recreational areas; 5. The grounds of any public or private elementary or secondary school and includes the possession of tobacco, nicotine, vapes, and smoking paraphernalia. This subsection does not prohibit the possession of smoking cessation products. �6. Ticket, boarding and waiting areas of transit depots; 67. Public plazas; and 78. The sites of public events including, for example, sports events, entertainment, artistic or speaking performances, ceremonies, pageants, and fairs, provided however that this prohibition shall not prevent the establishment of a separate, designated smoking area set apart from and no larger than the primary event area." Section 6. Section 10.16.050 (Parking for certain purposes prohibited.) of Chapter 10.16 (Stopping, Standing, and Parking) of Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text): "No person shall park a vehicle upon any roadway for the principal purpose of washing, waxing. wining. areasiniz or reoairin2 such vehicle. except reaairs necessitated by an emerzencv. > > >ftg g sueh vehiele, b an » Section 7. Subsection "A.2." of Section 15.06.050 (Fee reduction.) of Chapter 15.06 (Public Facilities Development Impact Fee) of Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text): 46A.2. Any developer whose development is subject to the public facilities development impact fee required by this chapter, including a developer who, in connection with the development, has constructed or financed regional or regionally significant public facilities substantially similar to those facilities that are listed or otherwise identified in the city's capital improvement plan, either through participation in a special district (e.g., a community facilities district or a special assessment district) or as a result of conditions of approval for the development, may apply to the director of community development for a reduction in that fee. The application shall be made in writing and fried filed with the director of community development no later than ninety days after the effective date of this section (the effective date of this section when originally enacted by Ordinance No. 97-09 was June 26, 1997), or ninety days after the city issues a building permit for the development, whichever is later. The application shall state in detail the factual basis for the request for reduction. The city shall consider entering into an agreement, or modifying an existing agreement, with any developer applying for a reduction pursuant to this subsection (A)(2)." Section 8. Subsection "C" of Section 16.36.080 (Processing procedures.) of Chapter 16.36 (Lot Line Adjustment) of Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text): "C. Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act Guidelines, the The applicant shall provide the City with new grant deeds which reflect the approved lot line adjustment. City shall record new grant deeds and provide copies to the applicant." 4 Section 9. Subsection "H" of Section 17.04.010 (Variances) of Chapter 17.04 (Permits) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text): "H. Time extension. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to three one-year extensions of time in which to use the plot p! use permit." Section 10. Subsection "B" of Section 17.04.020 (Temporary use permits.) of Chapter 17.04 (Permits) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text): `B. Permitted uses. Temporary uses are divided into three general categories: major, minor and master. Major temporary uses have a potential to create health and safety problems, can occur on undeveloped property, could create traffic problems and/or could potentially disrupt community life. Minor temporary uses occur on developed private property, generally commercial, for very short time periods. These temporary uses produce little noise, and have no impacts to adjacent properties or to traffic and public safety. Master temporary uses are similar, in effect, to minor temporary uses; however, they commonly occur for longer time periods. 1. Major temporary uses. The following major temporary uses may be permitted, subject to the issuance of a temporary use permit. a. Real estate offices and model homes within approved development projects; b. Temporary construction offices in all zones, except the Open Space and Conservation Zone. c. On- and off -site contractors' construction yards in conjunction with an approved active development project; d. Trailers, coaches or mobilehomes as a temporary residence of the property owner when a valid residential building permit is in force. The permit may be granted for up to one hundred eighty days, or upon expiration of the building permit, whichever first occurs; e. Christmas tree sales lots, however, a permit shall not be required when such sale is in conjunction with a business operating from a permanent building on a developed commercial site, holding a valid business license, provided such activity shall be only held from November 1 st through December 31 st; f. Fairs, festivals and concerts, when not held within premises designed to accommodate such events, such as auditoriums, stadiums, or other public assembly facilities; 5 g. Pumpkin sales lots; h. Seasonal sale of agricultural products; i. Outdoor temporary swap meets or auctions, limited to two events per calendar year, not exceeding four consecutive days." Section 11. Subsection "D" of Section 17.04.020 (Temporary use permits.) of Chapter 17.04 (Permits) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with additions appearing in underlined text): "D. Findings. The director of planning may approve, or conditionally approve a temporary use permit application, only when the following findings can be made: 1. The proposed temporary use is compatible with the nature, character and use of the surrounding area. 2. The temporary use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. 3. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community." Section 12. Section 17.05.030 (Modifications to an approved development plan.) of Chapter 17.05 (Development Plans) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text): "A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to establish the requirements and procedures to allow for the administfatiw modification of an unexpired or vested development plan or conditional use permit. For the purposes of this section, the following changes are not eligible for consideration as an administrative modification: a change in the type of building (commercial, office, industrial), a substantial intensification of the project or type of use, or substantial changes to the project layout or access. Proposed project changes that are not eligible for a modification under this section will require resubmittal of a new application. B. Types of Modifications. Modifications to approved development plans are divided into two categories: major and minor. If a proposed modification includes both major and minor modifications, the application shall be considered a major modification. The final decision as to whether a modification is major or minor shall be at the sole discretion of the poi plannin director of community development. 1. Major modifications to approved development plans include the following types of project changes: a. Increasing the height of the building by more than ten feet or one-story; b. An increase of more than ten percent of the building footprint; c. A substantial change in the architecture of the building or substantial changes to the exterior elevations including, but not limited to, the locations of windows or doors; d. A modification in the approved access to the project site; e. The shift of building location that effects the layout and location of the required parking, site access, or substantially changes the conceptual landscape plan; £ A change in the number of primary structures; g. Changes to a conditional use permit that requires the physical modification of the site. 2. Minor modifications to approved development plans include the following types of project changes: a. An increase of less than ten percent of the building footprint; b. A change in the layout of the parking or loading area; c. The relocation of windows or doors on one or two wall surfaces; d. An adjustment in the location of buildings provided the general location of each building is similar to the approved development plan; e. Changes to a conditional use permit that does not require the physical modification of the site. 3. Modifications to approved development plans that are subject to the administrative development plan process include the following: a. Changes to the approved landscaping plant palette; b. Changes in exterior colors or materials. C. Application Requirements. Applications for modifying development plans shall be completed in accordance with Section 17.03.030 of this development code. D. Procedure for Approval. Minor modifications may be approved administratively and never require a specific notice or consideration at a public hearing. The approval of major modifications requires consideration by the original approval body. Major modifications which were approved at a director hearing may be approved administratively by the dif-eeter ^erg director of community development, providing the revised project could have been approved initially by the director of community development. The aire^*^r of ,.',,,,, ing director of community development may refer any modifications or changes in building design to the planning commission for consideration. Construction plans that do not adhere to the exact details of an approved development plan shall not be administratively approved without filing an application for a major or minor modification, whichever is applicable. However, if the director of community development determines that changes to an approved development plan are insignificant and they are not specifically cited in subsections (B)(2) and (B)(3) of this section, then an application for a minor modification may not be necessary. E. Findings. Approving modifications to an approved development plan shall require the same findings as were made on the original approval. F. Expiration of Approval of a Modification to a Development Plan. Within three years of approval of a modification to a development plan, commencement of construction shall have occurred or the approval shall become null and void. G. Time Extension. The director of community development may, upon an application being filed iled prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five one- year extensions of time. Each extension of time shall be granted in one-year increments only. Upon granting of an extension, the director of community development shall ensure that conditions of the approval comply with all current development code provisions. 1. For any time extension that extends an approval that was originally approved at a public hearing, notice of the director of community development's decision to administratively approve a time extension shall be posted at the site and mailed at least ten days prior to its approval to the applicant and its representative (as shown on the application); to the property owner (as shown on the latest available equalized assessment roll of the county of Riverside) or the owner's agent; to all persons whose names and addresses appear on the latest available assessment roll of the county of Riverside as owners of property within a distance of six hundred feet from the exterior boundaries of the site for which the application is filed (a minimum of thirty property owners); to anyone filing a written request for notification; and to such other persons whose property might, in the director of community development's judgment, be affected by the establishment of the use or zone requested. Notice shall also be sent to public departments, bureaus, or agencies which are determined by the director of community development to be affected by the application. 2. A request for an extension of time beyond the fifth approval of an extension of time may be granted by the city council at a public hearing. 3. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. FH. Revocations. Approval of a modification to a development plan may be revoked or modified by the director of planning in accordance with Section 17.03.060 17.03.080." Section 13. Table 17.06.050A (Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L- 1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts) of Section 17.06.050(D) (Accessory Structures and Uses.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.06.050A remaining unchanged: Table 17.06.050A Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L-1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts Accessory Structure Front Yard Rear Yard Interior Side Yard' Accessory dwelling Not permitted in the Refer to the rear yard Refer to the side unit actual front yard setbacks in Table yard setbacks in unless it complies with 17.06.0406 Table 17.06.0406 Section 17.06.050(L)(11)4 6 Detached guest Not permitted in the Refer to the rear yard Refer to the side house actual front yards setbacks in Table yard setbacks in 17.06.040 Table 17.06.040 4. Seeend dwelling ttai Accessory Dwelling Unit in the L-1, VL, RR and HR zoning districts may be located in the actual front yard and shall be subject to the front yard setback requirements in Table 17.06.040, the residential performance standards as outlined in Section 17.06.070, and the special use standards as outlined in Section 17.06.050(L). 7. Only one detached guest house shall be permitted on any one lot with a single familX dwelling. Section 14. Subsection "J. L" of Section 17.06.050 (Special use standards and regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (additions appearing in underlined text): 64J.1. Solid fences, hedges and walls within the front setback shall have a maximum height of three feet in order to maintain safe visibility for pedestrians and egress and ingress of vehicular traffic. A combination of solid and open fences not exceeding six feet in height may be located in a required front yard, corner, side yard, or visibility clearance area, provided such fences are constructed with at least ninety percent of the top three feet of their vertical surface open, and non -view obscuring. Chain link fencing with or without slats is prohibited." Section 15. Subsection "L" of Section 17.06.050 (Special use standards and regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new number "12" to read as follows: 9 "12. Compliance with Building Code. Accessory dwelling units shall comply with local building code requirements that apply to detached dwellings." Section 16. Subsection `B" of Section 17.06.070 (Residential performance standards.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text): "B. Additions and Remodeling and New Construction of Accessory Structures. Additions, renovations and new accessory structures should be designed to provide variety and interest while creating an overall unified image. Building facades should be designed with consideration of appropriate materials, complementary colors, and by using materials with textures and depth of materials such as brick or stone. The additions or accessory structures should shall be designed in a manner that is integrated with the existing structures and avoid the appearance of being simply tacked on by the owner. This can be accomplished by: 1. Using similar roof pitches and types; 2. Using complementary or consistent materials and colors; 3. Designing additions as an integral part of the building; 4. Maintaining appropriate proportions of the existing building design; and 5. Maintaining a balance between the proportions of the existing building in terms of building mass and scale. Avoiding placing architectural elements that are visually more massive or heavier above elements that are visually lighter or less massive." Section 17. Section 17.08.030 (Use regulations.) of Chapter 17.08 (Commercial/Office/Industrial Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Section 17.08.030 remaining unchanged: "The land uses list in the following Table 17.08.030 shall be permitted in one or more of the commercial zoning districts as indicated in the columns corresponding to each residential commercial district. Where indicated with a letter "P," the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated with a "-," the use is prohibited within the zone. A letter "C" indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit." Section 18. Subsection "I" of Section 17.10.020 (Supplement development standards.) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text): L Modular Buildings and Structures. Modular buildings may be allowed in some circumstances as described in this section if they comply with the following requirements: 10 1. Accessory Structure. Modular buildings may be approved as accessory structures to a larger permanent building. The accessory buildings or structures shall be smaller in size than the main permanent building. Accessory structures can be allowed, subject to the approval of a development plan, for the following uses or activities: a. Religious institutions in all zones, except the open space and conservation zone. b. Industrial uses in the business park, light industrial, and service commercial zones. senservatien zene. Section 19. Table 17.24.040 (Parking Spaces Required) in Section 17.24.040 (Parking requirements.) of Chapter 17.24 (Off -Street Parking and Loading) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text), with all other provisions of Table 17.24.040 remaining unchanged: Table 17.24.040 Parking Spaces Required Description of Use Required Number of Spaces Residential Uses Multiple -family residential-13 or more units 1 covered parking space plus 1 uncovered parking space for 2 bedroom units. In addition, 1 guest space for every 6 units. 1 covered parking space plus 1 uncovered parking space for 2 bedroom units. In addition, 1 guest space for every 6 units. 2 covered parking spaces and 0.5 uncovered parking space for three bedroom (or more) units. In addition, 1 guest space for eve1y6 units. , .its.., f n fninimum guest spaees A minimum of 4 guest spaces is required for all multi -family residential with 13 or more units. Section 20. Subsection "F" of Section 17.24.050 (Parking facility layout and dimensions) of Chapter 17.24 (Off -Street Parking and Loading) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows (with deletions appearing in strikethrough text and additions appearing in underlined text): [E "F. Lighting. Lighting of outdoor parking areas shall be designed and maintained in a manner to prevent glare or direct illumination from intruding into any adjacent residential zone. A minimum of one footcandle of illumination shall be provided throughout the parking area, including all drive aisles and pedestrian paths of travel. Light standards shall conform to design specifications as determined by the director of public works. Lighting shall be consistent with the requirements established by Riverside County to reduce impacts upon the Mount Palomar Observatory Section 21. Section 17.34.010 (Definition and illustration of terms.) of Chapter 17.34 (Definition of Terms) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to delete the definition of "caretaker's residence", and to amend the definitions of "large family day care home" and guest house" as follows (deletions shown in strikethrough text, additions shown in underline), with all other provisions of Section 17.34.010 remaining unchanged: "Large family day care home" means a home which provides family day care to seven to few4eentwelve children, including children under the age of ten years who reside in the home, as defined in Chapter 3.4, Division 2 of the California Health and Safety Code, and up to fourteen children under specified conditions as provided in Section 1597.465 of the California Health and Safe . Code. "Guest house" means an additional structure to a primary residence on a parcel zoned for single-family residential, designed to provide accommodations for visitors, attached or detached, *Hied as an ineiden4a! use to the „ o�:ao,, o, but shall not be utilized as self e„*,,in living qtia-Aer-s or- a seeendar-y dwelling tmit (see Seeendar-y dwelling tinit) an accessory dwelling unit, and shall not contain provisions for the preparation of food, cooking, facilities or wet bar, A guest house shall not exceed one thousand two hundred square feet in area and shall contain a bathroom with a toilet, sink, and a bathtub and/or shower if it is over eight hundred square feet." Section 22. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. Section 23. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 24. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. 12 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of April, 2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 19-02 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 9th day of April, 2019, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 13 Randi Johl, City Clerk ITEM NO . 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Veterans of Foreign Wars, Temecula Valley VFW Post #4089 for the 2019 Memorial Day Observance (At the Request of the Military Subcommittee — Council Members Rahn and Schwank) PREPARED BY: Dawn Adamiak, Community Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Veterans of Foreign Wars, Temecula Valley VFW Post #4089 for support valued at $700 in City support services and $11,415 in promotional services for the 2019 Memorial Day Observance. BACKGROUND: Staff received a sponsorship request from Veterans of Foreign Wars, Temecula Valley VFW Post #4089 to provide City support for the 2019 Memorial Day Observance to be held May 27, 2019. The Military Subcommittee of the City Council (Council Members Rahn and Schwank) met on February 26, 2019, to review the budget on this special event and recommended support at the levels indicated below. The mission of Veterans of Foreign Wars, Temecula Valley Post #4089 is to foster camaraderie among United States veterans of overseas conflicts; to serve our veterans, the military and our communities; and to advocate on behalf of all veterans. The Memorial Day Observance will include a short program, Presentation of Colors, dignitary remarks and recognition of Gold Star parents. Due to the nature of the event, it is permitted to take place at the Fallen Heroes Memorial at the Temecula Duck Pond. FISCAL IMPACT: The City support costs of $700 and in -kind promotional services of $11,415 are included in the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Operating Budget of the various supporting departments. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS, TEMECULA VALLEY VFW POST #4089 THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of this 23Id day of April, 2019, by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Veterans of Foreign Wars, Temecula Valley VFW Post #4089, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Nonprofit"). In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The Nonprofit shall operate the Memorial Day Observance (hereinafter referred to as the "Event') on May 27, 2019. The Event is a special event which is located at the Temecula Duck Pond. The Temecula Duck Pond is approved due to the nature of the event and the new Fallen Heroes Memorial located at this site. b. The Event includes a short progam including Presentation of Colors, dignitary remarks and recognition of Gold Star Parents. C. Alcohol will not be served. d. The City desires to be a Co -Sponsor of the Event. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on April 23, 2019, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2019, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. CONSIDERATION a. In exchange for providing the Nonprofit with in -kind city -support services valued at an amount not to exceed Seven Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($700.00) and in -kind promotional services valued at an amount not to exceed Eleven Thousand Four Hundred Fifteen Dollars and No Cents ($11,415.00), as listed in Exhibit B, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a Co -Sponsor of the Event. As a Co -Sponsor the City shall receive sponsor benefits as listed in Exhibit A. b. WRITTEN REPORT Within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of the Event, the Nonprofit shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Event, its attendance, media coverage, and description of the materials in which the City has listed as a Co -Sponsor. The report shall also include samples of media, press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc., in a presentation notebook format. In addition, complete financial statements including a balance sheet, income statement and budget to actual comparison report of the Event must be included in such a written report. 04/18/2018 4. PERMITS The Nonprofit shall file an application for a Special Event Permit with the City no later than thirty (30) days prior to the first day of the Event. The City retains its governmental jurisdiction to determine whether to issue the permits and the nature and scope of Conditions of Approval. The Nonprofit shall comply with all conditions of approval for the Special Event Permit, or any other City -issued permits. Failure to comply with the Conditions of Approval of such permits shall constitute a default of this Agreement and is grounds for termination of this Agreement. 5. MEETING ATTENDANCE The Nonprofit shall attend all City pre -event planning meetings and event recap meetings if warranted. 6. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement. 7. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall secure and maintain from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement an insurance policy of comprehensive general liability against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by May 10, 2019, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Recipient owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Recipient has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. 4) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 04/18/2018 5) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 6) Worker's Compensation insurance is required only if Consultant employs any employees. Consultant warrants and represents to the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agencythat it has no employees and that it will obtain the required Worker's Compensation Insurance upon the hiring of any employees. b. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retenticns. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). C. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the NonProfit; products and completed operations of the Recipient; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Nonprofit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. d. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. e. Verification of Coverage. Nonproft shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed 04/18/2018 by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Nonprofit's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 8. GOVERNING LAW The City and the Nonprofit understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 9. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Nonprofit shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Nonprofit to comply with this section. 10. ASSIGNMENT The Nonprofit shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 11. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Recipient: Veterans of Foreign Wars, Temecual Valley VFW Post #4089 Attn: John Hernandez 28075 Diaz Road Temecula, CA 92590 04/18/2018 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. The Nonprofit shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit shall at all times be under the Nonprofit's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Recipient or any of the Nonprofit's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. The Nonprofit shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to the Nonprofit in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to the Nonprofit as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to the Nonprofit for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to the Nonprofit for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 17. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit and has the authority to bind the Nonprofit to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 04/18/2018 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS, TEMECULA VALLEY VFW POST #4089 (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: B on Lively, Post Quartermaster NONPROFIT Veterans of Foreign Wars, Temecula Valley VFW Post #4089 Attn: John Hernandez 28075 Diaz Road Temecula, CA 92590 iohnhernandezvfwft. mail.com PM Initials Date: 04/18/2018 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS CO-SPONSOR Veterans of Foreign Wars, Temecula Valley VFW Post #4089 shall provide the following benefits and services for the citizens of the City of Temecula: • City of Temecula logo/name on advertisements • City of Temecula name on all press releases • City of Temecula logo/name on event poster • City of Temecula logo/name on event flyers "Press Releases will be distributed to all local media, however, publication cannot be guaranteed. Press Releases can also be provided to all sponsors for distribution to their clients, agents, employees, etc. 04/18/2018 EXHIBIT "B" IN -KIND SERVICES ESTIMATED VALUE OF CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the Memorial Day Observance event. The following expenses can be anticipated for the event: Community Services: $ 400.00 Public Works: 300.00 TOTAL: $ 700,00 ESTIMATED VALUE OF PROMOTIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA The estimated value for in -kind promotional assistance provided by The City of Temecula for the Memorial Day Observance is as follows: Item Value Auto Mall Marque $ 3,115.00 Appears approximately once every 4 Y2 minutes Cable Channel $ 5,100.00 Event slide appears approximately once per hour for 30 seconds City Website $ 2,200.00 Event listing on the City of Temecula's event calendar Promotional Poster $ 1,000.00 42X66 poster displayed in the concourse at the Civic Center TOTAL VALUE: S 11 415-00 8 04/18/2018 ITEM NO . 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Sidewalk Improvement Guidelines PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the second amendment to the agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects, for $5,000, for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Sidewalk Improvement Guidelines, for a total agreement of $87,317. BACKGROUND: The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan illustrates an activated, pedestrian -friendly public realm that will be transformative for community character and identity, commercial development, and local connectivity. Spurlock Landscape Architects will develop Sidewalk Improvement Guidelines for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan that will define streetscape themes based on uses, activities, relationships and character; and create a sense of place and vision to make Uptown Temecula a safe and multi -modal district in the City. Spurlock will provide the City with a technical companion document to the Uptown Specific Plan and specifically focus on sidewalk improvements within the defined sidewalk zones for the Uptown Temecula districts. This second amendment allows Spurlock to attend additional public hearings and meetings regarding the Sidewalk Improvement Guidelines. FISCAL IMPACT: There are sufficient funds budgeted in the Planning line item 001.161.999.5248 for these services. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects / 7-9 z SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND SPURLOCK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT GUIDELINES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 23, 2019 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Spurlock Landscape Architects, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On June 13, 2017, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Sidewalk Improvement Guidelines", in the amount of $65,970.00, plus contingency in the amount of $6,597.00. b. On June 26, 2018, the City and Consultant entered into the First Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Sidewalk Improvement Guidelines", to add scope of work, extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2018, and to increase the payment in the amount of $9,750.00. C. The parties now desire to add scope of work, extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2019, increase the payment in the amount of $5,000.00, and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2019, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The SECOND Amendment amount shall not exceed five thousand dollars and zero cents ($5,000.00), for additional preparation of a summary presentation regarding the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Guidelines for a total Agreement amount of eighty seven thousand three hundred seventeen dollars and zero cents ($87,317.00). 4. Exhibit A and B to the Agreement are hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 04/18/2018 5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: .. Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: SPURLOCK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By:6,V Leigh Kyle, rincipal, President Brad Lents, Principal, Treasurer Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Spurlock Landscape Architects Attn: Brad Lents 2122 Hancock Street San Diego, CA 92110 619 691-0090 blents s uriock-land.com PM Initials,: Date: V 04/18/2018 ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT A & B Attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full is the additional scope of work and payment as provided by the Consultant. S P U R L 0 C K February 4, 2019 VIA EMAIL Dale West, Associate Planner II City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951)693-3918 dale_west6TemeculaCA. gov re: Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Additional Service X2: Planning Commission and City Council Presentations Dear Dale, We have prepared the following additional service proposal per your phone conversation with Amelia Capron on January 29, 2019. This additional service includes tasks as described below: TASK SUMMARY Prepare a PowerPoint summary presentation of the Uptown Temecula Street: cape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards document. Assume presentation is 10-15 minutes Long and that Spurloc]K will work in collaboration with the City of Temecula to coordinate presentation materials. (1) Presentation to the City of Temecula Planning Commission in Temecula. (1) Presentation to the City of Temecula City Council in Temecula_ TOTAL ADDITIONAL PEE THIS REQUEST $5, 000.00 We will invoice these services under the heading "X2 -Planning Comission and City Council Presentations All contract terms from the original contract dated June 13, 2017 apply. If you have any questions or comments please call- This proposed scope and fee is valid for 30 days from the date of this letter. If this meets with your approval, please send an agreement for execution. This document is not an enforceable contract_ Sincerely, apurlock Landscape Architects A California Professional Corporation (A 8y: Leigh Lyle, RLA, ASLA Principal Copies: Efile 2122 Hanco& Street San Diego, CaVornia 92110 619 6131 0090 ITEM NO . 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve License Agreement with Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, for Wireless Installations on Public Structures PREPARED BY: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR WIRELESS INSTALLATIONS ON PUBLIC STRUCTURES BETWEEN LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS AND CITY OF TEMECULA, AND FINDING THE ACTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA BACKGROUND: In response to a request from Verizon Wireless, the City began discussions with Verizon regarding a Master License Agreement (MLA) for installation of wireless facilities on public structures, primarily street light poles located within the public right- of-way. This discussion was initiated since the City is in process of acquiring all non -wood street light poles throughout the city from Southern California Edison (SCE). The proposed License Agreement is based on the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order, which establishes a new category of "small wireless facilities" and imposes substantial restrictions on state and local governments regulation of wireless facilities in the public rights -of -way. The FCC Ruling and Order took effect on January 14, 2019. Although the License Agreement is based on the current FCC Ruling and Order, the agreement includes a provision that allows for either party to request amendments to the agreement if there is a "Change of Law" affecting terms of the agreement. The following summarizes three key impacts of the FCC Declaratory Ruling and Third Ruling and Order: New Category of "Small Wireless Facilities" Established: These facilities are generally mounted on structures 50 feet or less in height; each antenna is no more than three cubic feet in volume; other wireless equipment associated with structure is no more than 28 cubic feet in volume; along with other size provisions. 2. Shot Clock Applicable to Small Wireless Facilities: The City is required to timely act on applications for small wireless facilities as follows: small wireless facilities collocations using an existing structure within 60 days from the date of filing; deployments of small wireless facilities using new structures within 90 days from the date of filing; and batched applications must be processed in accordance with shot clock requirements. 3. Permissible Fees for Deployment of Small Wireless Facilities: The City must demonstrate that any fees are a reasonable approximation of the City's costs; only objective reasonable costs are factored into this calculation; the fees are no higher than fees charged to similarly situated competitors; the Ruling and Order establishes "Safe Harbor" fees of $500 for non -recurring fees for up to five small wireless facilities and $270 per Small Wireless Facility per year for all recurring fees, including any right-of-way access fee or fee for attachment to municipality -owned structures. License Acreement for Wireless Installations on Public Structures The attached License Agreement for Wireless Installations on Public Structures is intended to comply with the FCC Report and Order described above. Verizon Wireless is planning to install small wireless facilities on City -owned street light poles, following acquisition of the poles from SCE. This License Agreement is non-exclusive and does not grant Verizon the right to make any Wireless Installation, or to install other facilities, that do not conform to this agreement. The following is summary of key terms included in this agreement: • Licensee shall be solely responsible for arrangement and payment for electric service necessary in connection with Wireless Installations. • Before placing any new or additional Wireless Installation onto any structure, Licensee shall apply for Encroachment Permit from the City; and the City shall be required to comply with shot clock provisions included in FCC Report and Order. • Licensee shall perform any Make -Ready work, including improvement or replacement of existing poles, at its sole cost and expense. • Licensee shall comply with all FCC regulations regarding radio frequency (RF) emissions and exposure limitations. • Licensee shall pay the City an annual license fee of $270 for each Wireless Installation and fee shall be increased by 2% annually. • If the City desires to replace or abandon any poles, Licensee shall be required to remove or relocate any Wireless Installations upon notice from the City. If Licensee desires to terminate the agreement, Licensee shall be required to remove any Wireless Installations within established timeframes. • The initial term of this agreement is fifteen (15) years. At the end of the initial term, the parties may mutually agree to extend the term for two (2) additional five (5) year terms. • Either party may, upon written notice to the other party, require that the terms of this Agreement, which are affected by any legislative, regulatory, judicial, or other action affecting the rights or obligations of the parties, be amended to conform to the new law on a going forward basis. Exhibit "A" Form of Encroachment Permit Attached is the City's standard Encroachment Permit Form Exhibit "B" Wireless Installation Design The parties acknowledge that the Wireless Installation design attached as Exhibit "B" constitutes a design that complies with the definition of a "Wireless Installation" in the Agreement. Exhibit B includes sample photo simulations of 4G/5G Technology. Environmental Determination Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively, "CEQA "), the adoption of the License Agreement is not considered a "project" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and Public Resources Code Section 21065. The adoption of this type of an agreement is not the sort of activity that may cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment. In the alternative, the License Agreement is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that there is no potential that the License Agreement may have a significant effect on the environment. Moreover, any site -specific future projects subject to the License Agreement would necessitate further environmental review on a case -by -case basis. Accordingly, no further environmental review is required. FISCAL IMPACT: The License Agreement requires Licensee to pay the City an application fee of $500 for up to 5 wireless installations with an additional $100 for each installation beyond 5. Also, Licensee shall pay the City annual license fee of $270 for each wireless installation and fee shall be increased by 2% annually. ATTACHMENT: 1. Resolution 2. Agreement for Wireless Installations on Public Structures RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR WIRELESS INSTALLATIONS ON PUBLIC STRUCTURES BETWEEN LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS AND CITY OF TEMECULA, AND FINDING THE ACTION EXEMPT FROM CEQA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval of Agreement. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves that certain agreement entitled License Agreement for Wireless Installations on Public Structures between Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, D/B/A Verizon Wireless and City of Temecula. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the License Agreement on behalf of the City. A copy of the final License Agreement, when executed by the Mayor, will be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. Section 2. City Manager's Authority. The City Manager (or his designee), is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to take all actions necessary and convenient to carry out and implement the License Agreement, and to administer the City's obligations, responsibilities and duties to be performed under the License Agreement, including but not limited to, approval and execution on behalf of the City of necessary documents to implement the License Agreement, including but not limited to, minor amendments or corrections as needed. Section 3. Environmental Analysis. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq., as amended and implementing State CEQA Guidelines, Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations (collectively, "CEQA "), the adoption of the License Agreement is not considered a "project" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 and Public Resources Code Section 21065. The adoption of this type of an agreement is not the sort of activity that may cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change to the environment. In the alternative, the License Agreement is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, in that there is no potential that the License Agreement may have a significant effect on the environment. Moreover, any site -specific future projects subject to the License Agreement would necessitate further environmental review on a case -by -case basis. Accordingly, no further environmental review is required. Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of April, 2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 19- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR WIRELESS INSTALLATIONS ON PUBLIC STRUCTURES BETWEEN LOS ANGELES SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS AND CITY OF TEMECULA EFFECTIVE DATE: 107968089_4.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. RECITALS......................................................................................................................................I CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS......................................................................................................I 1. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT............................................................................................................2 1.1 Scope of Agreement............................................................................................................2 1.2 Interference with Wireless Installations..............................................................................2 1.3 Installation of Poles.............................................................................................................3 2. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS..........................................................................................................3 2.1 Technical Requirements and Specifications........................................................................3 2.2 No Liens Permitted.............................................................................................................3 2.3 Worker Qualifications; Responsibility for Agents and Contractors....................................3 2.4 Utilities................................................................................................................................4 3. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT.....................................................................................................4 3.1 Application For Permit........................................................................................................4 3.2 Technical Review................................................................................................................4 4. PREPARATION OF STRUCTURES FOR ATTACHMENT....................................................5 4.1 Make -Ready Work and Costs.............................................................................................5 4.2 Notification of Completion of Installation..........................................................................5 5. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE; RESERVATION OF RIGHTS...................................6 5.1 Reservation of Rights..........................................................................................................6 5.2 RF Emissions......................................................................................................................6 5.3 FCC Antenna Registrations, Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") Compliance .......6 5.4 Equipment Modification and Replacements.......................................................................7 5.5 Access.................................................................................................................................7 6. CHARGES, BILLING AND PAYMENT.....................................................................................7 6.1 Annual License Fee for Wireless Installations....................................................................7 6.2 Timing of Payment and Calculation of Number of Wireless Installations ..........................7 6.3 Unauthorized Wireless Installations....................................................................................8 7. LIST OF AUTHORIZED FACILITIES; AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS................................9 7.1 Audits..................................................................................................................................9 7.2 Inspections..........................................................................................................................9 8. STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT AND ABANDONMENT AND REMOVAL OF WIRELESS INSTALLATIONS........................................................................9 8.1 Replacement or Abandonment of Structure........................................................................9 8.2 Removal of Wireless Installations by Licensee................................................................10 8.3 Licensee Safety or Other Violations.................................................................................10 �9� ICKI0 �7:1\[a] 11 10. LOST PROFITS OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION DAMAGES............................................12 11. INDEMNIFICATION...................................................................................................................12 12. TERM..........................................................................................................................................13 13. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION..............................................................................................13 13.1 Default..............................................................................................................................13 13.2 Licensee's Default and Licensor's Remedies...................................................................13 13.3 Licensor's Default and Licensee's Remedies...................................................................14 13.4 Effect of Termination........................................................................................................14 13.5 Effective Date of Termination..........................................................................................14 13.6 Cumulative Remedies....................................................................................................... 14 14. RESERVED...................................................................................................................................14 15. CONFIDENTIALITY...................................................................................................................15 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS............................................................................................15 16.1 Notices..............................................................................................................................15 16.2 Force Majeure...................................................................................................................15 16.3 Assignment and Transfer..................................................................................................16 16.4 Governing Law.................................................................................................................16 16.5 Change of Law..................................................................................................................16 16.6 Exhibits.............................................................................................................................17 16.7 Execution in Counterparts.................................................................................................17 16.8 Waiver...............................................................................................................................17 16.9 Severability.......................................................................................................................17 16.10 Survival.............................................................................................................................17 16.11 Waiver of Jury Trial..........................................................................................................17 16.12 Entire Agreement; Amendments.......................................................................................17 EXHIBITS A Form of Encroachment Permit B Wireless Installation Design in LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR WIRELESS INSTALLATIONS ON PUBLIC STRUCTURES This License Agreement For Wireless Installations on Public Structures (the "Agreement") is made and entered into as of 201_ ("Effective Date") by and between the City of Temecula ("Licensor" or "City"), and Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Licensee"). Licensor and Licensee shall be referred to hereafter individually as a "Party" and collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, Licensee seeks to affix wireless communication antennas and related equipment to certain of Licensor's Structures, as defined herein; WHEREAS, Licensor wishes to encourage wireless infrastructure investment by providing a fair and predictable process for the deployment of small wireless facilities, while enabling Licensor to promote the management of the rights -of -way in the overall interests of the public health, safety and welfare; WHEREAS, Licensor is willing to accommodate Licensee's non-exclusive use of such Structures in accordance with all applicable law and the terms of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the Parties hereby agree as follows: CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS As used herein, the following capitalized terms have the meaning ascribed to them below. "Applicable Law" means any and all applicable statutes, constitutions, ordinances, resolutions, regulations, judicial decisions, rules, permits, approvals or other applicable requirements of Licensor or other governmental entity or agency having joint or several jurisdiction over Licensee's activities under this Agreement or having jurisdiction that is applicable to any aspect of this Agreement, including the Temecula Municipal Code, that are in force on date of the execution of this Agreement, and as they may be lawfully enacted, issued or amended during the term of this Agreement. "Emergency" means a situation in which there is an imminent threat of injury to person or property, or loss of life. "FCC" means the Federal Communications Commission. "Make -Ready Work" means the work required on or in Licensor's Structure to create space for Licensee's Attachments, and/or replacing and/or reinforcing the existing Structure to accommodate Licensee's Attachments including, but not limited to, rearrangement or transfer of existing Attachments and the facilities of other entities, Structure relocation and replacement. "Permit" means an encroachment permit in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and issued and described in accordance with Applicable Law, which is used to regulate, monitor and control improvement, construction or excavation activities, or other work or activity, occurring upon or otherwise affecting the right-of-way. The Permit authorizes Licensee to install the Wireless Installations described in the Permit. "Person" or "Persons" means any person or entity. "Structure(s)" means pole(s) supporting one or more streetlights, traffic signals, flags, banners and/or signage, and any other similar structure(s) in Licensor's rights -of -way capable of accommodating a Wireless Installation. Structure does not include any Licensor building. "Technical Grounds" means, in light of prevailing industry engineering standards, reasons of insufficiency of capacity, safety, reliability and/or generally applicable engineering purposes consistent with Applicable Law. "Wireless Installation" means antenna system equipment, including facilities that operate on FCC -approved frequencies in the bands authorized for commercial wireless communication services by the FCC pursuant to FCC licenses issued to Licensee, and all associated equipment, affixed by Licensee to a Structure owned or controlled by Licensor pursuant to a Permit (in accordance with Section 3.1 hereof) authorized by Licensor, that meets each of the following three conditions: (1) The facilities: i. are mounted on Structures 50 feet or less in height including their antennas, or ii. are mounted on Structures no more than 10 percent taller than other adjacent Structures, or iii. do not extend existing Structures on which they are located to a height of more than 50 feet or by more than 10 percent, whichever is greater. (2) Each antenna associated with the deployment is no more than three cubic feet in volume. (3) All other wireless equipment associated with the Structure, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre-existing associated equipment on the Structure, is no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. The parties acknowledge that the Wireless Installation design attached hereto as Exhibit "B" constitutes a design that complies with the definition of a "Wireless Installation" above. The parties further acknowledge that Licensee intends to install Wireless Installations that utilize current telecommunications technology and may subsequently modify such Wireless Installations to accommodate new technologies. In the event Licensee desires to modify an existing Wireless Installation to accommodate a new technology, Licensee shall submit a new Permit application that includes the existing Wireless Installation and the modification that incorporates the new technology pursuant to Section 3.1 below, including the payment of the applicable application fee. If the new Permit is approved pursuant to Section 3.1 below, the new Permit shall replace the Permit for the existing Wireless Installation, in which case, the Permit for the existing Wireless Installation shall automatically expire on the Commencement Date of the new Permit. If the new Permit is denied pursuant to Section 3.1 below, then the Permit for the existing Wireless Installation shall continue in full force and effect pursuant to its terms. 1. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT 1.1 Scope of Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement grants Licensee the right to make any Wireless Installation, or to install other facilities, that do not conform to this Agreement. To the extent not already governed by Applicable Law, Licensor hereby grants Licensee such rights -of -way and easements for the use and benefit of Licensee as necessary to exercise the right to attach to Licensor's Structures, as provided herein. No use of Licensor's Structures under this Agreement shall create or vest in Licensee any ownership or property rights in such Structures. This Agreement does not apply to applications for Wireless Installations proposed to be located on City -owned property outside of the public right-of-way or on any City -owned buildings. 1.2 Interference with Wireless Installations. Licensor will not grant after the date of this Agreement a permit, license or any other right to any third party if, at the time such third party applies for access to a Structure, such third parry's use may in any way adversely affect or interfere with the Licensee's existing Wireless Installations, Licensee's use and operation of its facilities, or Licensee's ability to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 1.3 Installation of Poles. Notwithstanding any provision herein, Licensee has the right to install its own poles in municipal rights -of -way for the purpose of affixing its Wireless Installations, subject to City approval and in accordance with Applicable Law, or place Wireless Installations on third party poles in municipal rights -of -way. 2. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS 2.1 Technical Requirements and Specifications. (a) At its own expense, Licensee must erect, install, repair and maintain its Wireless Installations in safe condition and good repair in accordance with Applicable Law and: (i) the requirements and specifications of the National Electrical Safety Code ("NESC"), the National Electrical Code ("NEC") and any and all other applicable regulatory codes for safe practices when performing work on or near Structures (collectively, "Safety Codes"); and (ii) any current or future rules or orders of the FCC, the State public utility commission, or any other federal, state or local authority having jurisdiction. (b) Changes to the requirements, specifications, rules and orders in subsections (a)(i) and (a)(ii) shall not apply retroactively unless required by Applicable Law. (c) In the event Licensor reasonably determines that inadequate space exists on its Structure(s) to accommodate any proposed Wireless Installation, Licensee may elect to have such Structure(s) improved or replaced as part of Make -Ready Work, at Licensee's sole expense, with Structure(s) with adequate space to accommodate the proposed Wireless Installation, subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. 2.2 No Liens Permitted. Licensee will not, directly or indirectly, create, incur, assume or suffer to exist any lien with respect to any Structure or other Licensor property or facility resulting from any work performed by Licensee or on its behalf pursuant to this Agreement or any act or claim against it or any of its contractors, agents, or customers and will, at its sole expense, promptly take any action as may be necessary to discharge any such lien within thirty (30) days of Licensee first being notified in writing of its existence. 2.3 Worker Qualifications; Responsibility for Agents and Contractors. Each Party shall ensure that its workers and, to the extent that either may employ agents or contractors, their workers, are adequately trained and skilled to access Structures in accordance with all applicable industry and governmental standards and regulations. Licensor may deny access to its Structures to any such worker who is not so qualified, or does not act in a safe and professional manner when accessing any Structure. In such event, Licensee shall take such reasonable and necessary action so as to ensure that such worker does not continue to access Structures on Licensee's behalf unless such worker is qualified to Licensor's reasonable satisfaction. 2.4 Utilities. Licensee shall be solely responsible for arrangement and payment for electric service necessary in connection with Wireless Installations. 3. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT 3.1 Application for Permit. Before placing any new or additional Wireless Installation onto any Structure, Licensee shall apply for a Permit from Licensor. Upon receipt of a Permit application, Licensor shall approve or deny the request, including issuing all regulatory approvals required under the Temecula Municipal Code, within 60 days if the application involves the installation of Wireless Installations on existing Structures or replacement Structures, or within 90 days if the application involves the installation of Wireless Installations on new Structures to be installed by Licensee (i.e., the installation of a new Structure by Licensee intended to support a Wireless Installation in a location where a Structure did not previously exist) (as applicable, the "Shot Clock"). Licensor shall have 10 days after receipt of an application to notify Licensee in writing that the application is incomplete and the supplemental information that is required in order to complete the Permit application, in which case, the Shot Clock shall pause and restart upon Licensor's receipt of the supplemental information requested by Licensor. The Shot Clock may be further paused in the event Licensor advises Licensee within 10 days after receipt of the supplemental information provided pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence that Licensee failed to provide all the information originally requested by Licensor until Licensor receives such information. In the event of rejection of a Permit application, Licensor shall provide a written explanation to Licensee why the application is not in compliance with this Agreement or, to the extent consistent with Applicable Law, the Temecula Municipal Code within the Shot Clock. A Permit shall be deemed approved if not approved or denied (for reasons consistent with Applicable Law) within the time frames specified herein. Each Permit application may request attachments for up to ten (10) different Structures. Licensee may submit another Permit application, for up to ten (10) different Structures, thirty (30) days after the initial application is deemed complete by the City. For each approved Permit involving the installation of Wireless Installations onto existing or replacement Structures, Licensee shall pay a one-time, collective non -recurring application fee of $500 for the Permit and all other regulatory approvals required for the installation for up to five Wireless Installations with an additional $100 for each Wireless Installation beyond five, except that no such fee shall be required for a resubmitted application where such application was originally rejected as incomplete. For each approved Permit involving the installation of a Wireless Installation onto a new Structure to be installed by Licensee (i.e., the installation of a new Structure intended to support a Wireless Installation where a Structure did not previously exist), Licensee shall pay a one-time, collective application non -recurring fee of $1,000 for the Permit and all other regulatory approvals required for the installation, except that no such fee shall be required for a resubmitted application where such application was originally rejected as incomplete. Upon Licensor's approval of a Permit or in the event a Permit is deemed approved, Licensor shall issue the Permit and all regulatory approvals required under the Temecula Municipal Code for the Wireless Installations to Licensee, which shall be Licensee's notice to proceed with installation of the Wireless Installations. 3.2 Technical Review. Licensor will undertake all technical review activities necessary to approve or deny Licensee's Permit application within the Shot Clock. Such activities include, but are not limited to, assigning a Permit number, logging the Permit into the tracking system, determining any Make - Ready Work necessary in connection with the Permit, informing other attachers of Licensee's intent to attach, approving the Permit, and conducting field work to inspect the location, take needed measurements at the location, and inspecting the work. At the time of approving the Permit, Licensor will advise Licensee of any Make -Ready Work that needs to be performed in connection with the Permit, including replacing the Structure as provided for in Section 2.1(c). Licensee shall perform the Make -Ready Work itself and shall have sixty (60) days from approval of the Permit to accept the terms, unless Applicable Law provides a different deadline, at which time the Licensee's Permit application and any approvals shall lapse. 4. PREPARATION OF STRUCTURES FOR ATTACHMENT 4.1 Make -Ready Work and Costs. (a) If a Person, other than Licensor, would have to rearrange or adjust any of its existing facilities on a Licensor Structure in order to accommodate a new Wireless Installation, Licensee shall coordinate such activity, at Licensee's sole expense, and Licensor shall cooperate with such coordination. Licensee shall be responsible for directly paying such other Person for its charges for the same. If Licensee would have to rearrange or adjust any of its existing Wireless Installations on a Licensor Structure in order to accommodate new facilities for a Person, other than Licensor, Licensor shall require such Person to coordinate such activity with Licensee, at such Person's sole expense, and be responsible for directly paying Licensee for its charges for the same. (b) The Wireless Installation shall be conditioned on the completion of all Make - Ready Work needed to establish full compliance with NESC, and with Licensor practices and engineering standards. Neither the Licensor nor the Licensee shall be responsible for any third -party work, or their associated costs, conducted to correct third party attachments that are non -compliant at the time of Licensee's application, except that the Licensee shall be responsible for any work conducted by its third - party contractors. Subject to Section 1.2 above, if Licensee is requested by another Person, in comparable circumstances, to relocate or adjust any Wireless Installation to accommodate that Person's facilities, subject 4 to Licensor's written approval of such relocation, Licensee shall reasonably cooperate with such request. Licensor's ownership of its Structures shall not be affected by any Make -Ready Work. 4.2 Notification of Completion of Installation. Within twenty (20) business days of completing the installation of each Wireless Installation, Licensee shall notify Licensor of such completion. 5. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE; RESERVATION OF RIGHTS 5.1 Reservation of Rights. Subject to the terms of this Agreement and Applicable Laws, Licensor reserves the right to operate and maintain its Structures and facilities, to discontinue such maintenance, and to remove its Structures and facilities, in the manner it deems best to fulfill its own service requirements, and its public, employee and worker safety obligations. 5.2. RF Emissions. (a) Licensee will comply with all Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations regarding radio frequency ("RF") emissions and exposure limitations. Licensee is allowed to install signage and other mitigation, such as a power cut-off switch on Structures, to allow workers and third parties to avoid excess exposure to RF emissions. Licensor's authorized field personnel will contact Licensee's Network Operations Center at (800) 264-6620 not less than 24 hours in advance to inform Licensee of the need for a temporary power -shut -down. In the event of an unplanned outage or cut-off of power or an Emergency, the power -down will be with such advance notice as practicable. Once the work has been completed and the worker(s) have departed the exposure area, the party who accomplished the power -down shall restore power and inform Licensee as soon as possible that power has been restored. The Parties agree to limit the frequency of power -downs and restore power as promptly as much as reasonably possible. (b) Licensor, Licensee and other attachers of facilities that emit RF on Licensor's Structures must operate their own existing or future facilities to protect against RF interference to RF signals of Licensor, Licensee, and such other attachers, as applicable, as may emanate or arise. Licensor and Licensee and all others on Licensor's Structures shall endeavor to correct any interference to other networks created by its RF emissions promptly and shall coordinate and cooperate with each other relating to the same. Without limiting any other rights or remedies, if interference occurs and continues for a period in excess of 48 hours following notice to the interfering party via telephone to Licensee's Network Operations Center at (800) 264-6620 or to Licensor at (951) 694-6444, the interfering party shall reduce power or cease operations of the interfering equipment until the interference is cured, with the exception of operations necessary to test and/or cure the interference. The Parties acknowledge that there will not be an adequate remedy at law for noncompliance with the provisions of this Section and therefore the Parties shall have the right to equitable remedies such as, without limitation, injunctive relief and specific performance. 5.3 FCC Antenna Registrations, Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") Compliance. Licensee is solely responsible for ensuring compliance with any and all FCC antenna registration, FAA, or similar requirements with respect to the location of the Licensee's antennas or other facilities. Without limitation and to the extent consistent with Applicable Laws, Licensee acknowledges and agrees that Licensor's Structures are not "antenna structures" under the FCC's rules and that, accordingly, Licensor has no obligation of its own in this regard to register them with the FCC, the FAA, or other agency. 5.4 Equipment Modification and Replacements. Subsequent to the original installation of Licensee's equipment, Licensee may modify or replace the equipment so long as such modification or replacement does not substantially increase the load on the applicable Structure beyond the loading, if any, that was established in the approved Permit; substantially increase the size, height, or mass of the installation; or involve placement of equipment outside the area designated in the approved Permit, without obtaining prior written consent of Licensor. Licensee shall obtain Licensor's prior written consent for all other modifications, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensor shall either (i) approve and issue any required regulatory approvals, (ii) provide written notice that Licensee must provide additional information related to the modification, as specified in the notice, or (iii) provide written reasons why the modification does not comply with this Agreement or the Temecula Municipal Code, for any modifications requiring Licensor's consent within 60 days after Licensor's receipt of the request for modification, which may be extended for an additional 30 days upon mutual agreement of the parties. Licensor's approval of the modification and the issuance of the required regulatory approvals shall be Licensee's notice to proceed with the modification. 5.5 Access. At all times throughout the Term of this Agreement, and at no additional charge to Licensee, Licensee and its employees, agents, and subcontractors, will have twenty-four (24) hour per day, seven (7) day per week pedestrian and vehicular access ("Access") to, in and on any Structure used or to be used pursuant for an approved Permit so that Licensee may install, operate, maintain, repair, replace, remove, or modify its Wireless Installations. Except in the event of an Emergency or a network emergency, (i) Licensee shall provide notice to the Licensor at least seventy-two (72) hours before commencing any such work related to its Wireless Installations; and (ii) Licensee shall not conduct any work between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 7:30 a.m. on weekdays, between 6:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on Saturdays, or on any Sunday or City -recognized holidays without the express written approval of the Director of Community Development, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. 6. CHARGES, BILLING AND PAYMENT 6.1 Annual License Fee For Wireless Installations. Licensee shall pay Licensor an annual license fee (the "License Fee") of $270.00 per Wireless Installation in each Permit, provided, however, that the License Fee may be subsequently adjusted pursuant to Section 16.5 below. The License Fee shall be increased annually on January Pt, commencing January 1, 2020, by 2 percent. The License Fee is per Wireless Installation and includes all approved appurtenant equipment and facilities used in connection with Wireless Installations. Licensee may make License Fee payments by check made out to the order of the City of Temecula and sent to the following address: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590,_or through electronic transfer subject to the City's approval and necessary bank routing instructions. Licensor shall provide Licensee a completed Internal Revenue Service Form W-9 and state and local withholding forms, if required. 6.2 Timing of Payment and Calculation of Number of Wireless Installations. (a) Payment of the initial License Fee for each Permit shall be made within ninety (90) days after the Commencement Date (as hereinafter defined) for the Permit and prorated based on the amount of calendar days between the Commencement Date and the following January Pt, and thereafter each subsequent License Fee payments, as adjusted pursuant to Section 6.1 above, shall be made on or before January Pt of each year during the term of the Permit. 6.3 Unauthorized Wireless Installations. (a) Upon discovery of one or more Wireless Installations that were not permitted pursuant to a Permit or this Agreement (an "Unauthorized Wireless Installation"), Licensor may invoice, and Licensee shall pay to Licensor within forty-five (45) days from receipt of the invoice, an amount (the "Unauthorized Wireless Installation Fee") equal to 150% of the amount of the License Fees that would have been due under this Agreement if Licensee obtained a Permit for the Unauthorized Wireless Installation. The invoice shall describe the Unauthorized Wireless Installation and the method in which Licensor calculated the Unauthorized Wireless Installation Fee. If the Licensee fails to pay the Licensor within forty- five (45) days from receipt of the invoice, the Licensee shall remove the Unauthorized Wireless Installation within sixty (60) days after the expiration of the deadline for payment of the invoice, after which time the Unauthorized Wireless Installation shall constitute a default of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee may dispute that any alleged Unauthorized Wireless Installation was not permitted within the aforementioned forty-five (45) day period in lieu of paying the invoice, in which case, the Parties shall cooperate in good faith in resolving such dispute. (b) Within sixty (60) days after the expiration of the forty-five (45) day period to pay the Unauthorized Wireless Installation Fee, Licensee shall remove the Unauthorized Wireless 6 Installation unless Licensor authorizes the Licensee to submit an application for a Permit, which authorization shall be presumed if Licensee timely pays the Unauthorized Wireless Installation Fee. If so authorized, the Licensee shall submit a complete Permit application for the Unauthorized Wireless Installation within sixty (60) days after the expiration of the forty-five (45) day period to pay the Unauthorized Wireless Installation Fee. If Licensor denies a Permit application for an Unauthorized Wireless Installation, the Licensee shall remove the installation within sixty (60) days from receipt of the denial in writing. 6.4 Billing and Payment GenerallX. (a) Except as otherwise provided herein, all bills and invoices and other requests for payment rendered under this Agreement shall be paid by Licensee within ninety (90) days from the receipt of invoice. A 5% penalty will be applied to the total amount due to any unpaid amount after ninety (90) days from the receipt of invoice. (b) Licensee shall notify Licensor within ninety (90) days of the date of invoice of any dispute, with sufficient particularity to identify the amounts in, and grounds for, dispute. 7. LIST OF AUTHORIZED FACILITIES; AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS 7.1 Audits. (a) Upon request by Licensor, the Licensee shall submit to the Licensor a list of all of Licensee's Wireless Installations in the City, provided however, Licensee shall not be required to provide such list more than once per year or if no new Wireless Installations occurred since the last list provided by Licensee. In the event that there is a dispute regarding the number of installed Wireless Installations, Licensee and Licensor shall cooperate in determining the total number of Wireless Installations. (b) Licensor has the right to require a jointly conducted physical audit of Wireless Installations no more frequently than once every five (5) years, unless Licensee is responsible for a default under this Agreement, in which case Licensor may audit as it deems necessary until such default is cured. Licensor must provide ninety (90) days' prior written notice of any audit. Licensor will engage a third -party auditor to conduct the audit and Licensee will cooperate with the third -party auditor. (c) Licensee and Licensor may mutually agree that in lieu of such a jointly conducted physical audit, the number of Wireless Installations may be determined from existing maps and attachment records, in which case, each Party shall make all relevant maps and records available to the other Party and the number of Wireless Installations shall be cooperatively determined. 7.2 Inspections. Licensor may conduct, at its sole expense, routine inspections of Wireless Installations on Licensor's Structures and conduct inspections in the vicinity of Wireless Installations. Licensor shall give Licensee seven (7) days' prior written notice of such inspections and Licensee shall have the right to be present at and observe any such inspections, at Licensee's sole expense. However, in the event of an Emergency for which Licensor must promptly provide or restore safe and reliable service to a customer, or in the event of a potential safety issue, Licensor may conduct such inspections immediately and provide as much prior notice is as possible under the circumstances. If the Licensor determines that there is a safety violation caused by Licensee, Licensee shall correct it within fourteen (14) days after written notice or, in the event such correction reasonably requires more than fourteen (14) days, then as much time as is reasonably required to correct the violation provided Licensee commences the correction within the fourteen (14) day period and diligently pursues it to completion. 8. STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT AND ABANDONMENT AND REMOVAL OF WIRELESS INSTALLATIONS 8.1 Replacement or Abandonment of Structure. (a) If for safety, reliability or operational reasons or due to government requirements Licensor intends to replace a Structure to which Wireless Installations are affixed, Licensor may require the Licensee to remove the affixed Wireless Installation and transfer it to the replacement Structure within one hundred eighty (180) days after a Permit is issued for the installation of the affected Wireless Installations to the replacement Structure. (b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an Emergency, Licensor may power down the affected Wireless Installations or perform any other work in connection with said Wireless Installations that may reasonably be required to address the Emergency. In such a case, Licensor shall notify Licensee's Network Operations Center at (800) 264-6620 as soon as practicable. (c) If Licensor desires to abandon any Structure, it shall give Licensee one hundred twenty (120) days' prior written notice, and within such time, Licensee may remove or otherwise dispose of its Wireless Installations. In such event, Licensee may submit a Permit application to relocate the affected Wireless Installations to another Licensor Structure, in which case, Licensor shall expedite its review of the same and waive the application fee. (d) If a Licensor's Structure needs to be replaced in order to accommodate Wireless Installations, Licensee shall replace the Structure in accordance with City standards. Upon installation of the replacement Structure, title to the replacement Structure shall immediately transfer to Licensor upon completion of installation of the replacement Structure. In the event required by Applicable Laws, Licensor and Licensee shall execute any necessary documents in a commercially reasonable form to effectuate such transfer. (e) If, upon expiration of any required notice and cure period for removal, the applicable Wireless Installation(s) has/have not been removed, Licensor may at Licensee's sole expense, remove and dispose of the Wireless Installation(s). 8.2 Removal of Wireless Installations by Licensee. Licensee may at any time remove Wireless Installations from Licensor's Structures, and shall give Licensor notice of such removal thirty (30) days before removal. No refund of any License Fee paid will be due on account of such removal except as provided for in Section 13.3 or if triggered by casualty, fire or other harm affecting any Structure ("Casualty Event"). Licensor will provide notice to Licensee of any Casualty Event as soon as reasonably possible thereafter. In the event of damage by a Casualty Event to a Structure that cannot reasonably be expected to be repaired within forty-five (45) days following such Casualty Event or which Licensor elects not to repair (in which case, Licensor shall immediately notify Licensee), or if such Casualty Event is reasonably expected to disrupt Licensee's operations on the Structure for more than forty-five (45) days, then Licensee may, at any time following such casualty or harm: (i) immediately terminate the applicable Permit or affected portion thereof upon written notice to Licensor; (ii) place a temporary facility, if feasible and with the Licensor's express approval, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, at a location equivalent to Licensee's current use of the Structure until such time as the Structure is fully restored to accommodate Licensee's Wireless Installation; or (iii) submit a new application for Permit for an alternate location equivalent to Licensee's current use of the Structure, and Licensor shall waive the application fee and, if approved, transfer all remaining rights to the new Structure so long as such relocation was due to a Casualty Event not directly caused by Licensee. Any such notice of termination shall cause the applicable Permit or affected portion thereof to expire with the same force and effect as though the date set forth in such notice were the date originally set as the expiration date of the applicable Permit. The License Fee shall abate during the period of repair following such Casualty Event for each day on which Licensee's use of the Structure is impaired. Licensee will be entitled to collect all insurance proceeds payable to Licensee on account thereof, and to be reimbursed for any prepaid License Fee on a pro rata basis. 8.3 Licensee Safety or Other Violations. If Licensor discovers any regulatory, safety or other violation of this Agreement by Licensee with respect to Wireless Installations, it shall notify Licensee and Licensee shall have sixty (60) days after Licensee's receipt of notice in which to remedy such violations, except that Licensor may require quicker action within a reasonable period of time during an Emergency. 9. INSURANCE 9.1 Licensee shall at its sole cost and expense maintain the insurance coverage and limits required by this Section during the Term of this Agreement. Licensee agrees to procure the required insurance from an insurance company having and maintaining an A.M. Best rating of at least A-VII and deliver to a Licensor a Certificate of Insurance evidencing the types of insurance and policy limits required. 9.2 Required Insurance. (a) Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability insurance with a limit of $1,000,000 each accident/disease/policy limit. To the extent allowed by Applicable Law, the policy must include a blanket waiver of subrogation in favor of Licensor. (b) Commercial General Liability insurance written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage, with limits o£ $ 3,000,000 General Aggregate Limit $ 1,000,000 Each Occurrence $ 1,000,000 Each Occurrence - Personal Injury and Advertising Injury $ 2,000,000 Products/Completed Operations Aggregate Limit The Commercial General Liability policy must include Licensor as an additional insured as their interest may appear under this Agreement on a primary and non-contributory basis and a waiver of subrogation in favor of Licensor. (c) Commercial Automobile Liability insurance with limits of $2,000,000 Combined Single Limit each Accident for Bodily Injury and Property Damage, extending to all company owned, leased, and non -owned vehicles. 9.3 Licensee may meet the required insurance coverage and limits with any combination of primary and umbrella/excess liability insurance. Self -Insurance may be considered to comply with the insurance requirements under this Section 9. Acceptable assurance includes a letter of credit, payment bond, or other financial instrument at an amount determined appropriate by City's Risk Manager. Upon receipt of notice from its insurer(s), Licensee shall provide at least thirty (30) days advance written notice of cancellation of any required insurance that is not replaced. Licensee will require any subcontractors performing work under this Agreement to maintain substantially the same coverage and limits as required of Licensee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee may self -insure the required insurance under the same terms and conditions as outlined above. 10. LOST PROFITS OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION DAMAGES NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT TO THE CONTRARY, IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY OR INDIRECT DAMAGES SUFFERED BY THE OTHER PARTY OR BY ANY CUSTOMER OR ANY PURCHASER OF SUCH PARTY OR ANY OTHER PERSON, FOR LOST PROFITS OR OTHER BUSINESS INTERRUPTION DAMAGES, WHETHER BY VIRTUE OF ANY STATUTE, IN TORT OR IN CONTRACT, UNDER ANY PROVISION OF INDEMNITY, OR OTHERWISE. 11. INDEMNIFICATION 11.1 To the fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, indemnify, hold harmless and, at Licensor's sole option, defend Licensor, the Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, principals, parents, affiliates, officers, directors, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, licensees (other than Licensee), invitees, agents, attorneys, employees, volunteers, successors and assigns (together "Licensor Indemnitees") from and against any and all liabilities, damages or claims for damage, including but not limited to all actual and reasonable costs, expenses, penalties, liens, attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, and other charges or losses that Licensor Indemnitees may incur in law or equity, whether alleged or threatened, to the extent caused by the installation, operation, use, repair, or removal of Wireless Installations or breach of the terms of this Agreement by Licensee, including, when acting at the direction of Licensee, the acts or omissions by its officers, agents, employees, contractors, or subcontractors, including their officers, agents, and employees, except to the extent that such liabilities, damages or claims are a result of the negligence or willful misconduct of Licensor or the Licensor Indemnitees. 11.2 Licensee shall obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions substantially similar to those in this Section 11 from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Licensee in the performance of this Agreement. If Licensee fails to obtain such indemnity obligations, Licensee shall be fully responsible and indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Licensor Indemnitees from and against any and all liabilities, damages or claims for damage, including but not limited to all actual and costs, expenses, penalties, liens, attorneys' fees, expert witness fees, and other charges or losses, whether actual, alleged or threatened, which arise out of, are claimed to arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts or omissions of Licensee's subcontractor, its officers, agents, servants, employees, subcontractors, contractors or their officers, agents, servants or employees (or any entity or individual that Licensee's subcontractor shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of this Agreement, except to the extent that such liabilities, damages or claims are a result of the negligence or willful misconduct of Licensor or the Licensor Indemnitees. 12. TERM This Agreement shall commence as of the Effective Date, and, if not lawfully terminated sooner, remain in full force and effect for a term of fifteen (15) years. At the end of the term of this Agreement, the Parties may mutually agree to extend the term of this Agreement for two (2) additional five (5) year terms. The term of each Permit shall commence on the first day of the month following full execution of the Permit ("Commencement Date") and run concurrently with the term of the Agreement. The Parties shall negotiate an extension to the term of this Agreement in good faith. In the event any such negotiations continue after the expiration of the term of the Agreement, Licensee may remain on the Structures licensed to Licensee pursuant to any then existing Permits for a period of twelve (12) months, which may be extended upon mutual agreement of the Parties, and Licensee shall pay a License Fee for each Structure equal to 110% of the License Fee paid in the immediately preceding year. Subject to the immediately previous sentence, in the event this Agreement terminates or expires without extension or a new agreement, Licensee shall remove Wireless Installations from all Licensor's Structures within one hundred and eighty (180) days. If not so removed within one hundred and eighty (180) days following such expiration or early termination, Licensor shall have the right to remove such Wireless Installations, and to dispose of same, at Licensee's sole expense. 13. DEFAULT AND TERMINATION 13.1 Default. If either Party fails to perform or observe any material term or condition of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice of such failure from the other Party, then such Party will be in default of the Agreement ("Default"). In the event that the Default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days, no such failure will be deemed to exist if a Party has commenced to cure such Default within such period, such cure efforts are prosecuted to completion with reasonable diligence, and in any event are completed with ninety (90) days, unless additional time is reasonably required to complete the cure . 13.2 Licensee's Default and Licensor's Remedies. If Licensee does not cure its Default within the allotted time period, Licensor may, at its reasonable discretion, take any one or more of the following actions: (a) for a Default that is specific to one or more Permits: 10 (i) suspend Licensee's access to the Structure(s) to which such Default is applicable. (ii) terminate the specific Permit(s) or affected portion thereof granted to Licensee covering the Structure(s) to which such Default is applicable. (iii) require the obligation to be fulfilled. (b) for a Default that affects a substantial number of all Permits: (i) decline to issue additional Permits and/or Wireless Installations under this Agreement until all such defaults are cured. (ii) terminate this Agreement. (c) notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) above, in the event Licensee fails to pay to Licensor the Licensee Fee or any other payment or reimbursement due under this Agreement within the applicable notice and cure period, Licensee shall pay to Licensor a late fee equal to $270.00. 13.3 Licensor's Default and Licensee's Remedies. (a) If Licensor does not cure its Default within the allotted time period, Licensee may demand that the terms of this Agreement be complied with or terminate the specific Permit(s) or affected portion thereof granted to Licensee covering the Structure(s) to which such Default is applicable. Only in the case of a pattern or practice of Defaults that affect a substantial number of all Permits may the Licensee terminate this Agreement. (b) If Licensor Defaults and Licensee terminates the Agreement or a Permit, Licensor shall refund any portion of advanced, prepaid License Fee actually paid by Licensee pro -rated for any period following the effective date of the termination of this Agreement or the Permit, as applicable. Licensor shall make such refund within sixty (60) days of the effective date of such termination. 13.4 Effect of Termination. Licensee shall remove the affected Wireless Installations within one hundred eighty (180) days of termination, except as provided in Section 13.7 below. 13.5 Effective Date of Termination. Any termination under this Section 13 shall be effective upon written notice from the terminating Party to the other Party. Such notice will identify the effective date of the termination, which shall be determined in accordance with this Section 13 and may be as early as the effective date of the notice under Section 16.1. 13.6 Cumulative Remedies. The remedies provided by this Section 13 are cumulative and in addition to any other remedies available under this Agreement or otherwise. 13.7 Termination of Permits. A Permit may be terminated prior to the expiration of its term: (i) by Licensee at any time without cause upon notice to Licensor; or (ii) by Licensee in the event that (a) any applications for any governmental approvals necessary for the Wireless Installation are finally rejected; (b) any such governmental approval is canceled, expires, lapses, or is otherwise withdrawn or terminated by governmental authority; or (c) Licensee determines that such governmental approvals may not be obtained in a timely manner. If a Permit is terminated under this Section 13.7, Licensee shall remove the affected Wireless Installations within ninety (90) days of termination. 14. RESERVED 15. CONFIDENTIALITY Unless otherwise authorized by this Section, neither Party shall at any time disclose, provide, demonstrate or otherwise make available any confidential information of the other Party ("Confidential Information"). "Confidential Information" shall include any information of a confidential or proprietary 11 nature disclosed by a Party to this Agreement to the other Party. Each Party shall use its best efforts and shall cause its officers, directors, employees, lenders and agents (including retained attorneys and consultants) to whom such Confidential Information may be disclosed to safeguard the confidentiality of the other Party's Confidential Information. At a minimum, such precautions shall include, but not be limited to, all precautions taken to ensure the confidentiality of such Parry's own Confidential Information. Confidential Information may be disclosed (a) with the non -disclosing Parry's prior written consent, or (b) as may be required by Applicable Law, including the Public Records Act, or governmental authorities (including but not limited to disclosures necessary to obtain permits and other regulatory approvals); provided that the Party making such disclosures shall seek, and use all reasonable efforts, to obtain confidential treatment for the same, and notify the other Party prior to disclosure to permit the other Party to seek a protective order for the same. Notwithstanding anything in this Section 15 or elsewhere in this Agreement to the contrary, Licensee shall have the right, without the necessity of obtaining Licensor's consent, to provide copies of this Agreement (with financial terms redacted) and the locations of Structures to third parties as may be necessary to obtain required authorizations, or where otherwise compelled by law. 16. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 16.1 Notices. Except as provided below, all written notices shall be effective upon actual delivery or completed facsimile addressed to the other Party as follows: To Licensor: Aaron Adams, City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 in each of the above cases, with a copy sent to: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Licensee (including bills): Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless 180 Washington Valley Road Bedminster, New Jersey 07921 Attention: Network Real Estate Site: Temecula SC MLA Contact Number for day to day operations: Licensor: (951)694-6444 Licensee: (800)264-6620 Any Party may change its address or other contact information at any time by giving the other Party, and Persons named above, written notice of said change. 16.2 Force Majeure. Deadlines for completing work and providing notice under this Agreement shall be suspended for a reasonable period upon the occurrence of a force majeure event. 16.3 Assignment and Transfer. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the Parties. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, neither Party shall assign this Agreement or its rights or obligations to any firm, corporation, individual, or other entity, without the written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned 12 or delayed. Either Party may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to an affiliate without consent upon 30 days' written notice. Affiliate for purposes of this provision is (i) any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with a Party; (ii) a successor to either Party either by merger or other consolidation; or (iii) any entity that acquires all or substantially all of the Licensee's assets in the market defined by the FCC in which the Wireless Installation is located. 16.4 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, and enforced, in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflict of laws principles, and, where applicable, federal law. 16.5 Change of Law. Either Party may, upon written notice to the other Party, require that the terms of this Agreement, which are affected by any legislative, regulatory, judicial, or other action affecting the rights or obligations of the Parties, or establishing rates, terms or conditions for the construction, operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of Wireless Installations on Structures or in the rights -of -way, that differ, in any material respect from the rates, terms or conditions of the Agreement ("New Law"), be amended to conform to the New Law on a going forward basis for all existing and new Wireless Installations. In the event the New Law changes the fees due under this Agreement, the Parties agree that the License Fee for all existing and new Wireless Installations on a going forward basis shall be at the amounts set forth by the New Law or such amounts as agreed to by the Parties as a result of the New Law (as appropriate, the "New Law Fee"). In the event the New Law permits the Parties the discretion to negotiate the New Law Fee, the Parties agree to negotiate the New Law Fee in compliance with the New Law and in good faith within a reasonable time or the time frame required under the New Law, during which Licensee shall not submit any new Permits, and Licensor shall not be required to process the same, until the parties enter into an amendment to this Agreement to memorialize the New Law Fee. In the event that the Parties are unable to agree on the manner in which to amend the Agreement due to a disagreement on how to interpret the New Law, either Party may obtain a ruling regarding the appropriate conforming terms from a commission or court of competent jurisdiction and the Parties shall amend the Agreement to conform with such ruling. 16.6 Exhibits. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of this Agreement and any Exhibits attached hereto, the provisions of this Agreement shall supersede the provisions of any such incorporated Exhibits unless such Exhibit specifies otherwise. 16.7 Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, including by counterpart facsimiles or emails, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 16.8 Waiver. The failure of either Party to insist on the strict enforcement of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any provision. 16.9 Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is found to be unenforceable, the remaining portions shall remain in effect and the Parties shall begin negotiations for a replacement of the invalid or unenforceable portion. 16.10 Survival. The terms and provisions of this Agreement that by their nature require performance by either Party after the termination or expiration of this Agreement, shall be and remain enforceable notwithstanding such termination or expiration of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever. 16.11 Waiver of Ju . Trial. Each Party waives its right to a trial by jury on disputes arising from this Agreement. 16.12 Entire Agreement; Amendments. This Agreement (including the Exhibits hereto) embodies the entire agreement between Licensee and Licensor with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, oral or written, with respect thereto. Each Party acknowledges that the other Party has not made any representations other than those contained herein. This Agreement may not be amended or modified orally, but only by an agreement in writing signed 13 by the Party or Parties against whom any waiver, change, amendment, modification, or discharge may be sought to be enforced. [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the Effective Date. City of Temecula BY: Name: Title: Date Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: AirTouch Cellular Inc., its General Partner BY: Name: Title: Date 15 EXHIBIT "A " FORM OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT See attached. Permit Number [ City of Temecula - Land Development Division 41000 Main Street - Temecula, CA 92590 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Phone: (951) 308-6395 Fax: (951) 694-6475 Issued: Expired: Job Address: Legal Description: Applicant/Permittee: Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless Contractor: Utility Work Order Number: Description: [ This Permit is subject to the terms of that certain License Agreement for Wireless Installations on Public Structures dated as of (the "Agreement") between Permittee and City. The terms of the Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by reference. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Permit and the Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall control. Permit Number [ Permittee Responsibilities This Permittee agrees to indemnify, defend and save the City, its authorized agents, officers, representatives and employees, harmless from and against any and all penalties, liabilities or loss resulting from claims or court action and arising out of any accident, loss or damage to persons or property happening or occurring as a proximate result of any work undertaken under the permit granted pursuant to this application. THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND ANY ATTACHED PROVISIONS: 1. A pre -construction meeting is required 48 hours prior to any work. Permittee shall contact (951) 308- 6395 or email LDinspections(cDcityoftemecula.org to schedule a meeting. 2. BEFORE YOU DIG - CALL (TOLL FREE) 800-422-4133 3. Traffic control devices shall be utilized to protect and control pedestrian and vehicular traffic in the construction area in accordance with the latest revision of the "Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways" (MUTCD). The contractor shall submit a specific traffic control plan for review and approval by the City in accordance with City "Traffic Control Plan Guidelines" for all work within Major Circulation Element streets. 4. Trench repair shall be pursuant to City of Temecula Standard Drawing No. 407. 5. Water Quality: Contractor shall remain in compliance with the City Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. Contractor is required to provide protection of the City storm drain system. 6. Work hours shall be limited between 7:30 AM and 4:30 PM, Monday through Friday, unless otherwise noted. No work shall be allowed during City -recognized holidays." 7. All U.S.A. mark outs shall be removed prior to completion of project. 8. All contractors and subcontractors shall have a valid City of Temecula business license prior to start of work. 9. Should there be any claim against the City and the property owner with the encroachment being the proximate cause, the property owner shall be notified in writing to remove the encroachment within 30 days or the City will remove and bill the owner 10. Permission is hereby requested to encroach into public right of way to perform work as set forth above. It is understood that this permit is limited to the work described herein and that all work is to be done in compliance with the provisions attached to this permit and with all other applicable rules. Permittee shall be responsible for said compliance, for acceptability of the work, for repair or replacement thereof if defective, and for repair or replacement of any existing improvement damaged by the doing of the work. 11. 1 hereby certify and agree on behalf of the Permittee that all laws, regulations and ordinances of the City of Temecula and the State of California and the terms and conditions of the Permit shall be complied with whether herein stated or not. 12. 1 hereby warrant and represent to the City that I am authorized to execute this Permit Application on behalf of the Permittee and bind the Permittee to the agreements contained herein and any conditions of the Permit. ******Contractor and all subcontractors shall be present at the pre -construction meeting; otherwise, the meeting will be rescheduled to a later date"'** Permittee Date City Engineer or Authorized Representative Date EXHIBIT "B" WIRELESS INSTALLATION DESIGN See attached. I ' WHO lki 4 k Ed M, ITEM NO . 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve the Minor Construction Services Agreement with Moore Fence Company, Inc., for Old Town Temecula Community Theater Fence Installation PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Minor Construction Services Agreement with Moore Fence Company, Inc., in the amount of $42,404.51, for Old Town Temecula Community Theater Fence Installation. Per Public Contract Code Sections, 22020, 22032 & 22034 and City Municipal Code Chapter 3.32, Section 3.32.010, the Department of Public Works obtained a quote from Moore Fence Company, Inc., to perform minor construction services for the installation of ornamental perimeter fencing for the Old Town Temecula Community Theater. Moore Fence Company, Inc., provided a comprehensive quote, including a competitive price, and addressed the aesthetic and ornamental style as requested, to ensure a quality finished product. Over the past several years, Public Works has worked with Moore Fence Company, Inc., and they have consistently provided exceptional service and quality workmanship. Staff is recommending the approval of the Agreement, for $42,404.51 with Moore Fence Company, Inc. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the TCSD Theater Maintenance Budget (190.189.164.5212) for Fiscal Year 2018-2019. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR MINOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MOORE FENCE COMPANY, INC. OLD TOWN TEMECULA COMMUNITY THEATER FENCE INSTALLATION THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 23, 2019, between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Moore Fence Company, Inc, a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: TERM This Agreement shall commence on April 23, 2019, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2020, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall construct and install all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Work"), and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be completed on or before June 30, 2020. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed in writing by the City. 3. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the scope of work, payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Forty -Two Thousand, Four Hundred and Four Dollars and Fifty -One Cents ($42,404.51) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. C. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees, it shall give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, 02/27/2019 Contractor shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 4. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 3 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. The acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against City under or arising out of this Agreement, except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify Agreement with each claim for payment. 7. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Agreement from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 8. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a 02/27/2019 proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http-.LIWWw-dir-ca._qov/Public-Works/PtiblicWorks.html 9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers (hereinafter "indemnified parties") from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the indemnified parties may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or 02/27/2019 wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the indemnified parties. 12. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The indemnified parties are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the indemnified parties. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the indemnified parties. Any insurance or self - insured maintained by the indemnified parties shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 02/27/2019 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the indemnified parties. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. By executing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies: I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. 02/27/2019 b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Agreement, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by City for purposes of letting this Agreement out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Agreement. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 17. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 18. UTILITY LOCATION City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 19. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 20. INSPECTION The Work shall be subject to inspection and testing by City and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the Work. The Work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion 02/27/2019 of the Work. Inspection of the work shall not relieve the Contractor of the obligation to fulfill all obligations under this Agreement. 21. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Contractor: Moore Fence Company, Inc. Attn: Scott Moore 280 E. First St. Perris, CA 92570 23. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 24. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 25. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non- 02/27/2019 contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 26. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 02/27/2019 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Moore Fence Company, Inc. By, ; Scott Moore, President CONTRACTOR Moore Fence Company, Inc. Contact Person: Scott Moore 280 E. First St Perris, CA 92570 Phone Number: 951 718-9777 scott@moorefence.net PM Initial: Date: 9 02/27/2019 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK «•ORK riCLUDED: Moore Fence Company, hic. shall pfonde the constriction services includute the labor. utatertals. and cV4puieni. necessary to coutplete the following scope of ►vnrk for the above referenced project for the price Uidicased (see exclusions below). SCOPE OF WORK: Install 69' of custom 8' high ornamental iron fence to include (1) 12' Ride double swing gate and (2) 48" wide swing gates with panic hardware, and (3) 42" Ride single swing gates with panic hardware. 10 02/27/2019 EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE CA License491610; MOORE FENCE COMPANY INC. Certifications c Crafts: L l310656 / 3077 SBE Certified: 1?430?? V eon## hl' LircmeM OOt117l7 IBEAI--LOCAL. 4' OR license ui213476 UTLx. M9 l2A72 &541 Estimator: Jacob Moore FuR Workers Camp. & Cell: - LiahilitvInswrance jacob a-warefemcemet Insured & Bonded ToII Free 1-588-718-9777 280 E-1" Perris, CA 92570 Fa: (9S1) 940-0d29 PROPOSAL FOR: City of Temecula DATE: 3l1949 Address: 41000 Afam St. Temecula, C?19'{90 Phone: (951) 302 - 4104 Jobsite: 42051 Main St. Tem"Un, C A 9 2 9 " e-mail: john.maiseyi temeculaca.gov WORK D CLUDED: Moore Fence Company, Inc_ shall pimide the construction senices inrludae the ]abor, materials, and equipment, uecessary to complete the following scope of work for the above referenced project for the price indicated (see exdusiors below). SCOPE OF R'ORK: Install 69' of custom 8' high ornamental iron fence to include (1) 1_' Ride double swing gate and (2) 48" Ride sino swing gates with panic hardware, and (3) a'_" wide single suing gates with pa nic hardware. (2) 4" x 4' x ._'700 wall sq posts set in a cement footing (6) 3' x 3" x 1 lga sq gate posts set in a cement footing 2-1 2" x 2-1 ' x 1 i ga sq post set on a max of 8' on center set in a cement footing -Most posts will be core drilled into existing cement slab with an 8' min embedment and a 16: min embedment for gate posts - 8' high x 8' wide ornamental Iron panel - 2" x _"' x 14p sq rails - 1' x I"x 16ga sgpickets Ton centers - 4" circles welded between pickets - All materials pre -galvanized with 2-part epoxy primer and black finish * Ornamental panels on top of concrete planter will only be 6' high - (1)124" wide x 8' high double swing ornamental tron gate - 2" x 2' x 14ga sq rails - 1" x 1 ' x 16ga sq pickets 5" on centers - 4" circles welded between packets - All materials pre-gahanized with 2-part epoxy primer and black fmish - Standard 6' barrel hinges, cane bolts, and hardware (3) 42" wide x 8' high single swing ornamental iron gate and (2) 48" wide x 8' high single swing ornamental iron gate - 2" x -" x 14ga sq rails -1' x 1" x 16ga sgpic kets 5' on centers - 4" circles welded berween packets - All materials pre-pkani with 2-part epoxy pnmer and black finish - Von-Duprin panic hardware and exit leis key control - Loci ox Samson-2 gate closer - li2" Expanded metal with 10' kickplate Total hice: $42,404.51 CLARMCATIONS140TES: -Ptaposalisfor(1)[aohtlizaIiaryatynobi xanomsto;fromjobsite early, Any additionalmobilizauoas,'demohilintionswill restiltinadditional cbarees. -Price reflects normal digging, proposal based an seem the and dLmges in price can ocrnr do to rock or abnormal digging conditions Moose Fer. R rri?F ae*d ?2 harm notice to utntact 6L. altm to baseundrtgaund utilities wnsied. Omm is respon iV* to hate undergrmmd utilities marked but iftt;e owner gives titoorefence"' hour ounce before the start of the projecs.lom Fie can conucr Dig A!A!n for the customer. TIME Fir UMF: Lead Time: 14 - 42 day: Substantial Completion of Field Wwk: 74 wodtag day(i) REFERENCES: Bid per prevailing wage rates TER3tS: Proposal is good for a period of 60 slays from slate issued. Materials to be delisered to job site or stared at Moore Feot:e Company faEflAy. Progress payments ougwzt duration ofprojtaz (when applicable) Balance of cuotmact due upon completion of phased work; Dot 30 day, in Sill upon receipt of final imoice (less any retention) EXCLUSIONS,. (when applicable of unless ot3rew•ise noted on this proposal): CAD welding, certified welding, ciBa g, compaction of soils, concrete washout rebar cages, Jemofitian. dug coaimL Pagi�. gats locks. Faoxbom,ker gate operators, gate closers, vinyl comtiag, grading, grounding, electrical. clearing gmbbinf inspection semces, x curb- Nrf repwn. patmir, sanitation services, saw cutting aiphalteatcrete, upaM silt fence, spark removal, swt-ey'sq. engiattmitg. S%TPP, temporary fencinf. traffic -onirnL trey Wouniog mndscrem repiks todanWtd Undagm id hom m capacirg (Di' Alert 811). water to be sipped byGC SIGNATURE OF ACCEPTANCE Submitted by Moore Fexce Company, Inc. (Please return one signed copy, of This proposal) E]�oote Signanre Date GeIL-L E-mail: )acobvmmoeefencemet .filmy Address Coact Phone R atoorateueeampaxy,l>t[. � 11fYr_r"'.YlrrlS,t:J►Y2p7nl Ya:r-itift�7r71-Y777 � ra2_(Y�l)Y4V-ViW 02/27/2019 MMUTES OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF MO ORE FENCE COMPANY, INC. 11= mincutl niecting of the Shamholders of MOORE FENCE COMPANY, INC., gthe 'Txq)0 tion") was bald on APRIL 15, 20I2 as set forth in the written waiver of notice signed by the Shareholders, 11w meeting was culled to order by SCOTT A. MOORE, the President of the Corporation, There were present at the meeting; SCOT T A. MOORE Ding all the Shamholders of the Corporation. Upon motion duty made, secvodcd artd utumimously carried, it was RESOLVED, that the persons listed below be, and they hcreby are, eleeted m Din #ors and Officers of the Corporation whiO they havc pmviously agrecd to accept and to sene until the next annual meeting of Shareholders, antil their suoceasors arc duly eleeted and quality: President 4con A. MOORE Secretary SCO7T A. MOORE T;casurer SCOT T A. MOORE RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Secretary of the Corporation is retloircd to file or cause to be filed with the office of tips Nevada Scerctry of State the Annual List of Officers, stating and recording the ofliims of the Corporation, pwsuartt to Nevada Cosp rations Codt:, copy of said tiling to be placed in the Cwpomtions record book.. The Secretary further wportM that the Agent for Service ofPtocess for the N vacla Corpomdon is; Kingdom ConsulduM Inc. 1432 Iran Dills Lano s 'Vcgm, ice' 89134 SOMA Ilia the President fuMer reported pnm am to Title 7 of the Nevada Revind Statutes, the Corporation has complied and filed Neva& State Business Li=se along with the .fees pair) to the Novab Scaremy oCState, Cbpy of said filing is Ming glac eci in the Corporations Record Boiik. MOl VED, being no further business to come Mare the mecting. uNn motion duty made, seconded and ummimously catri4 the meWog was adjoumcd. V MODRIE, SmMtK r Minutes , pproved- St~ OTT , MfJORE$ Directoru�_ MINUT S OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF MOORE FENCE COMPANY, INC. he annual mectins of the ShmhoWm of MOORE FENCE Ct']MPAN V, INC., (the *'Cc mo tion") was beld on A PRIL 1 , 012 as so forth in the written ww vv� of notice signal by the Shareholders. The meeting was called to order by SCOTT A. MOORY, the President ibf the orpor ion. There were present ut the meeting: SCOTT A. MOORS being all the Shmholders oftl:e Corporation. Upon mmian duly niade, s ,�R)ded wzd unanirriuusly carried, it was RESOLVED, that the persons listed below be, and they hcrcby aye, cleated &, Dir lars and Queers of the Corporatioi whir.h tb y havc prcviowly agreed to awept aad to serve until the next vial r eetIng of hareho[ders, until tbcir aiu ssors are droly elected and fy-, President SCOT MOORE OO Secretary SCOIT A. MORE Treasurer SCOTT A. MOORE RESOLVED E1 R'1(`HEX 1101 the Secretary of the CoiPcprad4xi is required to filc or cause [o be t')W with the otflce of the Nevada Secretary of State the -knnual List of Offluors. sating and recording the offi=s of the Corporation, pursuant to Nevada Cc rpoz,,i tions Codc, wpy of said filing to be placcd in dw Corpomi ins turd book. The Smeary further mportt-d that the Agent for Sery ice of Proms f0 r t Nvada Corpom6ort is; Xlngdom Consulting, I ac. 143:2 Iron iidli Lv ae Log 'Vegas, 1W 89134 RESOLVED, Tyra! the Pmsident furtt;tr reported pursunni to Title 7 of ncc Ncvada Revised atstut , the Cbrporafiov has mnpfled Rad films Nevada State Bminesi 1 eense along with the fees paid to the Novmiv S mury 6rSlate, Copy of said filing is being pht in the iv;owratiom Record WK-A- RESOLVED, being no fu het business to curve before ft meeting, upon motion duly mac, si=aded and unmimously cw-vL4 the r!od� was acjoum d. SC( A., MOORS, Secretary Minutes ,Apprnvcd: OTT A. MORE, Director ITEM NO . 10 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve the Minor Construction Services Agreement with Morningstar Productions, LLC, for Community Recreation Center Amphitheater Lighting Installation PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Minor Construction Services Agreement with Morningstar Productions, LLC, in the amount of $46,149.63 for Community Recreation Center Amphitheater Lighting Installation. The project will include the demolition and removal of the old amphitheater lighting located on the exterior stage at the Community Recreation Center (CRC). The current system is no longer in working order and most components have become obsolete, therefore equipment parts and services are unavailable to make any needed repairs or replacements. The new lighting system will improve energy efficiencies, enhance safety, and provide updated fixtures with current technology to support theater and musical productions for the community. In accordance with Public Contract Code Sections, 22020, 22032 & 22034 and City Municipal Code Chapter 3.32, Section 3.32.010; the Department of Public Works obtained a quote from three vendors to perform minor construction services for the installation of theater lighting for the Community Recreation Center Amphitheater. Upon review of the quotes and scope of services, it was determined that Morningstar Productions, LLC provided the most comprehensive quote, competitive price, and presented a quality product for consideration. For the past several years, both Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) and Public Works have worked with Morningstar Productions, LLC, and they have consistently provided exceptional service, including quality products and workmanship. Staff is recommending the approval of the Agreement, in the amount of $46,149.63 with Morningstar Productions, LLC. FISCAL IMPACT: This item was budgeted as Capital Outlay, to be funded from the Facilities Replacement Fund for Fiscal Year 2018-2019. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR MINOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MORNINGSTAR PRODUCTIONS, LLC COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER AMPHITHEATER LIGHTING INSTALLATION THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 23, 2019, between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Morningstar Productions, LLC, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on April 23, 2019, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2019, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall construct and install all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Work"), and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be completed on or before June 30, 2019. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed in writing by the City. 3. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the scope of work, payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Forty -Six Thousand, One Hundred Forty Nine Dollars and Sixty -Three Cents ($46,149.63) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. C. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees, it shall give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Contractor 02/27/2019 shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 4. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 3 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. The acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against City under or arising out of this Agreement, except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify Agreement with each claim for payment. 7. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Agreement from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at httD://www.dir. ca�gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 8. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the 02/27/2019 Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublieWorks.html 9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers (hereinafter "indemnified parties") from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the indemnified parties may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or 02/27/2019 omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the indemnified parties. 12. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The indemnified parties are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the indemnified parties. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the indemnified parties. Any insurance or self - insured maintained by the indemnified parties shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 02/27/2019 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the indemnified parties. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptabifity of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. By executing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies: I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. 02/27/2019 b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Agreement, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by City for purposes of letting this Agreement out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Agreement. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 17. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 18. UTILITY LOCATION City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 19. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 20. INSPECTION The Work shall be subject to inspection and testing by City and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the Work. The Work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the 02/27/2019 Work. Inspection of the work shall not relieve the Contractor of the obligation to fulfill all obligations under this Agreement. 21. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Contractor: Morningstar Productions, LLC Attn: Alan Morgenstern 41213 Sandalwood Circle Murrieta, CA 92562 23. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 24. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 25. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof or in the business of 02/27/2019 the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 26. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 02/27/2019 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Morningstar Productions, LLC (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: AlanIMorge stern, President Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Morningstar Productions, LLC Attn: Alan Morgenstern 41213 Sandalwood Circle Murrieta, CA 92562 Phone: 951-677-4443 audloguy@msmp.com PM Initia�Is. Date: O 02/27/2019 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK • Installation of indoor and outdoor lighting equipment at the Community Recreation Center Amphitheater (30875 Rancho Vista Rd) • Purchase of Equipment per sales quotes 17-211 and 19-2043 10 02/27/2019 EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Sales Quote MOM NGS AN Sales Quote Number 17-221 I P R O D U C T II O N $. L L C Temecula Recreation Center CRC Indoor stage Lighting 41213 Sandahrood Cir Mumeta. CA 92562 Phone: 951-877-W3 Fax: 951A77-6477 www MSMP.com Client ShiR Date / Location City of Temecula, The Temecula Recreation Center AP 30875 Rancho Vista Road 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92592 Temecula, CA 92590 Office: 951-694-6480 Fax: 951-694-6488 Saks Person Quoted Date Sates Tax PO Number Alan Morgenstern 21512019 Tax Temecula 8.75 Teens Discount Deposit Deposit Due Date See Below $0.00 3131P2t119 Qty. Type Description Notes Time Rate Price Each Total 6 Retail ADJ COB CANON WASH C08963 1 Sales 38743 2.324.58 RGBA Wash Fixture 80' Lens 17 Retail ADJ COB CANON WASH DW COB 1 Sales 319.95 1,919.70 Cool & Warm White Lighting Fixture with80' Lens 8 Retail ADJ Encore Profile 1000 Color ENC 132 1 Sales 08743 5,499.44 (Front of Stage) 120 Watt COB RGBW ellipsoidal, sharp or soft edge beam, manual focus, man - Retad Doug Fleanor DMX Isolated 12 Way DMX 1 Sales 2,074.60 2,074.60 Spliner 1211-TB Misc Doug Fleanor DMX Switch SW1-TO 1 Sales 243.60 243.60 Misc Doug Fleanor RKa-1 Rack Kit 1 Sales 41.60 41.60 Note All Fixtures include Power Cable & Safety Cable 10 Retail Accu-Cable ACP3DMX3 10' DMX Cable t Sales 10.24 1 D2 40 Jumper 10 Retail AcarCable ACP3DMX3 5' DMX Cable 1 Sales 6.43 102.88 Jumper - Retail Accu-Cable AC3DMX300 300' Spool of I Sales 11093 119.93 install DMX Cable 8 Retail Accu-Cable DMX T Pack 5 Pin & 3 Pin 1 Sales 7.43 44.50 DMX Terminator 4 Retail West Penn D4851 GY1000 1 Sales 510.00 2,040.00 IndoorfOutdoor Rated Data Cable 24 awg 1 Pair 120ohm 1000' ' Retail Miscellaneous Materials Connectors, 1 Sales 35000 35000 Zip ties, Hardware 6 Retail Rapco Horizon Custom 2 Gang BLACK t Sales 4750 285.00 Box Cover Loaded with XLRF3 Connectors Labeled DMX and run # 24 Retail ADJ Tngger Clamp t Sales 19.43 46644 1 Retail Termination of cables, Testing, I Sales 49900 499.00 Programing, and Consulting on project Sates Quote (Saks Quote Number. 17-2211) Qty. Type Description Notes Time Rate Price Each Total 1 Retail ADJ MY DMX RM Rack Mount I Sales 33650 338.50 Controller / DMX Recorder Service On site training for staff: TWO one hour l Sales 0.00 0.00 consultations Notes: Subtotal: 316,450.23 Morningstar Productions, LLC is a DIR Registered Vendor PWC Registration Number: 1000028131_ Sates Tax: $1,414.44 Total: $117,11194.67 TERMS Net 30 With City of Temecula PO Delivery to site Included Total Applied Payments: $0.00 With Order, Balance Due: $17,86d_67 III 02/27/2019 MORNIN PRODUCTIONS. LLC 41213 Sandahrood Cir Munieta CA 92562 Ptwne: 951-677-4443 Fax: 951-677�47-r wtw -MSMP cam City of Temecula, The AP 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Office: 951-694-6480 Fax: 951-694-6488 Sales Quote Sales Quote Number: 19-2043 Temecula recreation center CRC outdoor Stage Lighting Sales Person Quoted Date Sales Tax PO Number Alan Morgenstern 11 ,2019 Tax Temecula 8.76 Terms Discount Deposit Deposit Due Date Net 30 $0.00 Qty. Type Description Notes Time Rate Price Each Total 8 Retail Elation CW Profile HP-IP Fixture Mounted to Sales 1,525A0 12,200 DO Poles 8 Retail Elation PHDL19 Lens for IP Fixture Sales 21375 1,710.00 8 Retail Elation Seven Par 71P Wash fixture Over Stage Sales 636.00 5,088.00 Retail Doug Fleanor DMX Isolated 12 Way DMX Sales 2,07460 2,074.60 Splitter 1211-TB 12 Retail Elation IP DMX Cable 5' STR527 Sales 17 92 215.04 16 Retail Elation IP DMX Cable 10' STR540 Sales 20 92 334.72 2 Retail Elation IP DMX Cable STR566 Sales 31.42 62.84 4 Retail West Penn D4851 GY1000 Sales 51D 00 2.040.00 IndoorlOutdoor Rated Data Cable 24 awg 1 Pair 120ohrn 1000' Retail Doug Fleanor DMX Switch SW1-TB I Sales 243.60 243.60 Retail Doug Fleanor RK6-1 Rack Kit I Sales 41 60 41,60 6 Retail Accu-Cable DMX T Pack 5 Pin & 3 Pin 1 Sales 7A3 44.56 DMX Terminator 1 Retail Miscellaneous Materials Connectors, 1 Sales 35000 350,OD Zip ties, Hardware 8 Retail Rapco Horizon Custom 2 Gang BLACK 1 Sales 47.50 380,00 Box Cover Loaded with XLRF3 Connectors Labeled DMX and run # 20 Retail ADJ Trigger Clamp 1 Sa es 19.43 38870 1 Retail Terrninabon of cables, Testing I Sales 499.00 499.00 Programing, and Consulting on project t Retail ADJ MY DMX RM Rack Mount 1 Sales 338.50 336.511 Controller; DMX Recorder t Service On site training for staff: TWO one hour I Sales 0.00 000 consultations s Quote ;Saes Quote Number. 19-20431 Notes: Subtotal: S26,009 18 Morningstar Productions, LLC is a DIR Registered Vendor PWC 75813 Registration Number: 1DDDD28131. sales Tax: 8,2 Total: $28,284.4-96 96 TERMS Net 30 With City of Temecula PO Delivery to site Included Total Applied Payments: $0 00 with Order. Balance Due: $28,284.96 12 02/27/2019 Secretary of State Statement of No Change (Limited Liability Company) 33 LLC•12NC 1 9- 4 18256 IMPORTANT -- Read Instructions before completing this form. This form may be used only If a complete Statement of Inforrnatlon.has been filed previously and there has been no change. Filing Fee — $20.00 Copy Fee — $1.00: FILED Secretary of State State of Califomia FEB 0 9 209 Certification Fee - $5.00 plus copy fee This Space For Office Use C+tly 1. Limited Liability Company Name (Enter the exact name of the LLC as it is recorded with the California Secretary of State. Note: If you registered in California using an altemate name, see instructions.) Morningstar Productions, LLC 2. 12-Digit Secretary of State File Number I 3. State, Foreign Country or Place of Organization (only if formed outside of California) 200112110130 4. No Change Statement (Do not alter the No Change Statement. If there has been any change, please complete a Statement of Information (Form LLC-12).) There has been no change in any of the information contained in the previous complete Statement of Information filed with the California Secretary of State. 5. The information contained herein is true and correct. 02/03/2017 Alan Morgenstern Dale Type or Print Name of Person Completing the Form President TMe Signature Return Address (Optional) (For communication from the Secretary of State related to this document, or if purchasing a copy of the filed document, enter the name of a person or company and the mailing address. This information will become public when filed. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING.) Name: F 1 Company: Morningstar Productions, LLC Address: 41213 Sandalwood Cir Cityistate/Zip: L Murrieta, CA 92562 LLC-12NC (REV 01/2017) 2017 CaUtomia Secretary of Stale www.sos.ca govlbusinesslbe Business Search - Business Entities - Business Programs I California Secretary of State Page 1 of 1 200112110130 MORNINGSTAR PRODUCTIONS, LLC Registration Date: Jurisdiction: Entity Type: Status: Agent for Service of Process: Entity Address: Entity Mailing Address: LLC Management 04/27/2001 CALIFORNIA DOMESTIC ACTIVE ALAN MORGENSTERN 41213 SANDALWOOD CIR MURRIETA CA 92562 41213 SANDALWOOD CIR MURRIETA CA 92562 41213 SANDALWOOD CIR MURRIETA CA 92562 Member Managed A Statement of Information is due EVERY ODD -NUMBERED year beginning five months before and through the end of April. Document Type jj File Date j; P D F SI-NO CHANGE 02/09/2017 SI-COMPLETE 0412712015 REGISTRATION 04/27/2001 https://businesssearch.sos.ca.gov/CBS/Detail 02/21 /2018 State of California LL ' •�.� Secretary of State STATEMENT OF INFORMATION' (Limited Liability Company) FILAID Filing Foo $20.00. If this is an amendment, see Instructions. Soo tarry of.Stge IMPORTANT — READ INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM ftft OfCalftmie f LIMITED LfARILITY COMPANY NAME Morningstar Productions, Ll_C _-2_7 205 This Space For Filing Use Only File Number and State or Place of Organization 2. SF.CRkrARY OF STA 1 E FILE NUMRFR 200112110130 3. California R PLACF_OF ORGANIZATION W formed outside of Cavornia) Nu Change Statement 4, If there have been any changes to the information contained in the last Statement of Information filed with the California Secretary of State, or no Statement of Information has been previously filed, this form must be completed in its entirety. If there has been no change in any of the Information contained in the last Statement of Information filed with the California Secretary of State, check the box and proceed to Item IS. Complete Addresses for the Following (Do not abbreviate the name of the city, Items 5 and 7 cannot be P.O. Boxes,) 5. S I REST ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL OFFICE CITY _ STATE ZIP CODE 41213 Sandalwood_ Cir Murrieta CA 92562 6, MAII ING AI)DRI:SS C,i I I i:, II: Ulf !"F_RI?N f :I I IAN I'I f:M S _ CITY _ STATE ZIP COD(:^_ 7 S ilil-" I AUURFSS L)h CAI-IFORNIA OFFICE —�— — CII V.� —^µTT S I-ATF� ZIP CODE.__ �~ -- 41213 Sandalwood Or Murrieta CA 92562 Pameand Completo Address of the Chief Executive Officer, If Any NAME City SI'ATE ZIP CODE Alan Morgenstern Name and Complete Address of Any Manager or Managers, or if None Have Been Appointed or Elected, Provide the Name and Address of Each Member (Attach additional pages. if necessary.) _ a. NAME City STATE. ZIP CODE - Jennifer Morgenstern 10. NAME: ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE 11• NAME �-� - —f- —_ ADDRESS -- - CITY STATE 71P CODE Agent for Service of Process if the agent Is an individual, the agent must reside in California and Item 13 most ao completed Wth a California address, a P.O. Box is not acceptable. If the agent is a corporation, the agent must have on file vnth the California Secretary of State a certificate pursuant to California Corpufalions Code section 1505 and Itein 13 must be left blank. •,rs; NAMR, 1F AGL'14 i r01 I'MCf= OF'f?ItOCE55 n - - s, • _ ; '''•' S s • i C;r'+.i. ,:1 _' �';,l 13.'.$-1W RS ADDRESS OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS IN CAI.IFORNIA, IF AN INDIVIDUAL: •CII-' STATE 'LIP CODE 41`t13-5artdalivood,Cir _ _ Murrieta CA' 92562- Type of Business ., 14. DFSCRIBF WE [YI'F OF,I;USINFSS OF' IHI:I IIAI1 ED LIABILITY COMPANY . _ •. „ _ _. ,, Y__ _� _ . _ „�„ Entertainment Production Services 15. IHF INFORMA IION CON I'AINW HEREIN, INCLUDING ANY A'ITACHMEN IS, 15 TRUE AND CORRFC I 02/26/2015 Alan Mojgenstern _ _ President JPNIATURE — _ DATC TYPE OR PRINT NAM[: OF PERSON COMPLETING TI IL- FORM f l rLE 1.1-C•12 (RIcV 0112014) APPROVED BY SECRETARY OF STATE ITEM NO . 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve a Five -Year Minor Maintenance Agreement with Pacific Striping, Inc., for Citywide Repainting of Traffic Striping Services for Fiscal Years 2020-2024 PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Senior Management Analyst Stacey Biddle, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve a Five -Year Minor Maintenance Agreement with Pacific Striping, Inc., in the amount of $1,764,926.00, to provide Citywide Repainting of Traffic Striping Services, to complete two cycles in each fiscal year, for Fiscal Years 2020-2024; 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve additional work not to exceed a contingency amount of $176,574.00, which is approximately 10% of the Agreement amount BACKGROUND: On December 19, 2018, the Public Works Department Maintenance Division posted on the City of Temecula' s online bidding service, Planet Bids, a Request for Proposal ( RFP) No. 231, for citywide repainting of traffic striping services. These services will provide for biannual (2 cycles) painting of citywide traffic striping, including on -call and emergency call -out services, as needed, throughout the city. The Public Works Department received the following five (5) electronic proposals: 1 Pacific Striping, Inc. $176,492.60/per cycle 2 Superior Pavement Markings $273,347.00/per cycle 3 Statewide Stripes, Inc. $287,363.04/ er cycle 4 Cal Stripe Inc $411,973.40/per cycle 5 PCI $428,222.00/ er cycle Selected panel members reviewed each proponent's submittals and collectively determined Pacific Striping, Inc, to be the most qualified and competitively priced vendor to provide annual painting of traffic striping services. Staff is recommending the approval of an agreement with Pacific Striping, Inc., for annual maintenance services, for a period of five years, for Fiscal Years 2020-2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds will be made available in the Annual Operating Budget to complete two cycles, in each fiscal year, for a total annual obligation of $388,300. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement — Pacific Striping, Inc. AGREEMENT FOR MINOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND PACIFIC STRIPING, INC. CITYWIDE REPAINTING OF TRAFFIC STRIPING THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of July 1, 2019, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Pacific Striping, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2019, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2024, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Work"), and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A. 3. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed One Million, Seven Hundred Sixty -Four Thousand, Nine Hundred Twenty -Six Dollars and No Cents ($1,764,926.00) for the total term of this agreement and a contingency amount of One Hundred Seventy -Six Thousand Five Hundred Seventy -Four Dollars and No Cents ($176,574.00) for a total not to exceed Agreement amount of One Million Nine Hundred Forty -One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($1,941,500.00), unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. C. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees, it shall 02/27/2019 give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Contractor shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 4. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 3 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. The acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against City under or arising out of this Agreement, except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify Agreement with each claim for payment. 7. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Agreement from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http�/i,<yww.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 8. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and 02/27/2019 material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to htti2://www.dir.ca-gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html 9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- 02/27/2019 performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 12. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, 02/27/2019 officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City 's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. By executing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies: I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this 02/27/2019 Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Agreement, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by City for purposes of letting this Agreement out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Agreement. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 17. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT After the completion of the Work contemplated by this Agreement, Contractor shall file an affidavit with the City Manager stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 02/27/2019 19. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 20. UTILITY LOCATION City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 21. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 22. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 23. WRITTEN NOTICE Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Contractor: Pacific Striping, Inc. Attn: Scott Fisher P.O. Box 1691 Whittier, CA. 90609 24. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 02/27/2019 25. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 26. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 02/27/2019 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA M Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: Rand! Johl, City Clerk PACIFIC STRIPING, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate oMcers required unless corporate documaKs authorize only one person to sign the agreement on b~ of the corporadon.) By: S tt Sher, President By: Greg Fi er, ecreteryl reasurer Greg FI!Ver;? , 02/27/2019 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: PACIFIC STRIPING, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Scott Fisher, President By: Greg Fisher, Secretary/Treasurer Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Pacific Striping, Inc. Attn: Scott Fisher P.O. Box 1691 Whittier, CA. 90609 _ 562-945-7805 pacstripe@gmail.com PM Initials: Date: 9 02/27/2019 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK Contractor recognizes and agrees that this Agreement is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship between the City of Temecula and the Contractor, for citywide repainting of traffic striping. Work will include maintenance services, and emergency call -out. The procedure for assigning work is set forth as follows: 1. The City Manager or his designee shall submit to Contractor a written "Request for Work". The Request for Work shall include a description of the work to be completed, the time for completion of the work, and the plans and specifications, if any, work. 2. Within five (5) business days of the date of the Request for Work, Contractor shall respond in writing to the Request for Work and advise the City Manager whether it can perform the work and specify the cost of material which will be required and the estimated cost of labor and equipment necessary to complete the work in accordance with the labor and equipment rates set forth in Exhibit "B" to this Agreement. 3. In the event emergency work is required, the City Manager may transmit the Request for Work orally to the Contractor. As soon as practical following the emergency, the Contractor and Director shall in good faith confirm in writing the scope of the emergency work undertaken. 4. Upon acceptance of the Contractor's response by the City Manager, the Contractor shall proceed with the work. The performance of the work shall be pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. On -call and routine painting of traffic striping M 02/27/2019 EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Services shall be as per Contractors submitted proposal as outlined in Exhibit A, but in no event shall the total cost of services exceed $1,941,500.00 for the total term of the Agreement. Pricing will be as below per cycle, biannually, in an amount not to exceed $388,300.00 annually. Unit costs shall include all materials, supplies, labor, equipmervt and ancillfary costa required to oomplete the work Ot1tIllttt MUMUWr "tdllff 1MMCIEANO 4" CENTER LINE (DETAIL 1) OR 4 LANELINE (DETAIL 8) INCLUDES 50' LEAD INIOUT LINE AT 849,600 ! LF I 0.025 21,240.00 INTERSECTION 2 4" LEFT EDGELINE (DETAIL 24) OR 413,000 LF 0.060 24,780.00 .... - - 4® RIGHT EDGELINE (DETAIL 27B) ........- --....-....... . _................ _... .................. _ .._.........__ .. _. _.....-_ . .. - -. 0.095 3 MEDIAN ISLAND (DETAIL 28) 542,800 LF 51,566.00 8" CHANNELIZING LINE (DETAIL 200,600 LF 0.090 18,054.00 5 NO PASSING ZONES - ONE i 94.400 LF 0.009 849.60 DIRECTION (DETAIL 15) i 6 ...._........... 6" BIKE LANE LINE (DETAIL 39) 453,120 LF 0.075 ._ � 33,984.00 7 6" INTERSECTION LINE BIKE LANE 113,280 LF .075 8,496.00 (DETAIL 39A) TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE 0.090 17,523.00 8 (DETAIL 31) 194,700 LF The estimated quantities above approximate the quantities needed to complete one cycle of repainting of traffic_ striping citywide The City typically completes Mcl cycles of repainting per fiscal year 11 02/27/2019 t�P� SO�HEDl�1.»� Unn costs .hall incurde all mateMs, suppWs, labor equipment and ancillary casts required to oomplele 0}e work rr" MG I amps"oMe ! ww' I LOT M7hCyI 9 8 La" (YE*Ilow or white) Each 10.00 10 6' White Sine +LF 5.00 11 Type rV Arrows /Each 50,00 ...... _ ................. ......... .. — --------. - - i 2 Type vl Anows /Each 50.00 13 12' Tt emumMastrr. Lim (Yellow or W1*e) /V 15.00 14 e' Tnemx*aMk Letters (YeIk► a VA*e) Sech 10.00 15 j Type IV Therrncr0as be Arrow Y /E ch 100.00 # ............. _ _.._ - ----- - 16 Type VI TherrnooPa do Anew /Each _ 100.00 .... .......... .._..... _....... - -- ---------- t 17 Paktbpd Curb (AN Colors) /LF 2.50 18 faint Bike Lane & Alrr M Legend /Each 100.00 19 t_aywt (LF .25 20 Mobiltzalion /LS 2.500.00 MW am I amen r lr. aulrw►tl>«lln I Uff I LW �aMas� 21 Remove lane Stnpe (Include RPMs) !LF 5.00 22 Remove t2' Lift Linn/Dxmwalk /SF 500 _ .. 23 �.._ _ _.._. _....._..� I�emcne TTroP,rrr►upl�s!lrJPe�Int Marksrx�s ........ ... - ------------- ... 1SF S,OD (/Vr , Nurrber5_ Words,8 Symbois a( All Type9) 24 Remove Curb Rains MI Typ£s) IF 5.00 f 12 02/27/2019 F � i ffTw 40 RJ1AW PAVtl-n YbAKCsiU O M11tW'1'WM QUAMMY LW UNI MCI F i+:Jt 7 5V � f I i 'Each 7 51) 1 1 + (Each Soo `y�3 %? H.4;3•1r.rr ._........... 0-20 (Each 12.50 27 ...... ......... .... .......................... 2 1- i [?1:7 ) E ao, l ;i. 00 1 01 + /Earh 750 f gw' G Marko- I 0-20 .,Ea r.h 12 50 2 21-100 /Eat_h r 1 0 1 f 7M TY .' H k`jfsr%f 0-2fT Ta t1 � tZ50 9 -_ — ,E . .. ._............... 1 21 OCI a c►•1 C10(Ul 11 1 Blue NI I yrw 1 MaAfw i !Each 25 00 13 02/27/2019 ITEM NO . 12 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve a Five -Year Minor Maintenance Agreement with Trueline Construction & Surfacing, Inc., for Sports Court Crack Repair, Resurfacing, & Striping for Fiscal Years 2020-2024 PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Senior Management Analyst Stacey Biddle, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a Five -Year Minor Maintenance Agreement with Trueline Construction & Surfacing, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $300,000, to provide Sports Court Crack Repair, Resurfacing, and Striping Services for Fiscal Years 2020- 2024. BACKGROUND: On January 16, 2019, the Public Works Department Maintenance Division posted on the City of Temecula's online bidding service, Planet Bids, a Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 230, for sports court crack repair, resurfacing, and striping services. These services will provide for annual maintenance of tennis, hockey, and basketball court surfaces as needed throughout the city. The Public Works Department received three (3) electronic proposals by the submission deadline of February 7, 2019. Selected panel members reviewed each proponent's submittals and collectively determined that Trueline Construction & Surfacing, Inc, to be the most qualified and competitively priced vendor to provide sports court crack repair, resurfacing, and striping services. Staff is recommending the approval of an agreement with Trueline Construction & Surfacing, Inc., for annual maintenance services, for a period of five years, for Fiscal Years 2020-2024, in an amount not to exceed $300,000 for the total term of the agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Cumulatively, $200,000 is programmed in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), for Fiscal Years 2019-23. Additional funding will be requested, in future fiscal years, not to exceed $300,000 for the total term of the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement — Trueline Construction & Surfacing, Inc. AGREEMENT FOR MINOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TRUELINE CONSTRUCTION & SURFACING, INC. SPORTS COURT CRACK REPAIR, RESURFACING, & STRIPING THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of July 1, 2019, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Trueline Construction & Surfacing, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: TERM This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2019, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2024, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Work"), and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A. 3. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Three Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($300,000.00) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. C. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees, it shall give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Contractor shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 02/27/2019 4. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 3 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. The acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against City under or arising out of this Agreement, except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify Agreement with each claim for payment. 7. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Agreement from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at httpi//www.dir,ca.go. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 8. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work 02/27/2019 pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.htmi 9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 02/27/2019 12. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 02/27/2019 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City 's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. By executing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies: I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. 02/27/2019 b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Agreement, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by City for purposes of letting this Agreement out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Agreement. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 19. UTILITY LOCATION City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 02/27/2019 20. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 21. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Contractor: Trueline Construction & Surfacing, Inc Attn: Edward Kruse 1651 Market St. #B Corona, CA 92880 23. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 24. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 25. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of 02/27/2019 Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 27. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 02/27/2019 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Trueline Construction & Surfacing, Inc. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: - Edward Kruse, President By: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Trueline Construction & Surfacing,_ Inc. Attn: Edward Kruse 1651 Market St. Ste. B,_Corona, Ca 92880 Phone Number: 951 817-0777 Fax Number: (951) 817-0770 Trueline40@outlook.com PM Initial Date: 117 9 02/27/2019 EXHIBIT "All SCOPE OF WORK Contractor recognizes and agrees that this Agreement is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship between the City of Temecula and the Contractor, for the future repairs, and maintenance of tennis, hockey, and basketball courts at the various locations upon real and personal property of the City. Work will include maintenance services, and emergency call - out. The procedure for assigning work is set forth as follows: 1. The City Manager or his designee shall submit to Contractor a written "Request for Work". The Request for Work shall include a description of the work to be completed, the time for completion of the work, and the plans and specifications, if any, work. 2. Within five (5) business days of the date of the Request for Work, Contractor shall respond in writing to the Request for Work and advise the City Manager whether it can perform the work and specify the cost of material which will be required and the estimated cost of labor and equipment necessary to complete the work in accordance with the labor and equipment rates set forth in Exhibit "B" to this Agreement. 3. In the event emergency work is required, the City Manager may transmit the Request for Work orally to the Contractor. As soon as practical following the emergency, the Contractor and Director shall in good faith confirm in writing the scope of the emergency work undertaken. 4. Upon acceptance of the Contractor's response by the City Manager, the Contractor shall proceed with the work. The performance of the work shall be pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Game court resurfacing Game court striping and crack repair Emergency maintenance and call -out service iN] 02/27/2019 EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Services shall be as per Contractors submitted proposal as outlined in Exhibit A, but in no event shall the total cost of services exceed $300,000.00 for the total term of the Agreement. Unit of Quantity Unit Price Extended Price Measure 1 Patricia H. Birdsall EA 4 38360.00 Sports Park Basketball 9590.00 Court Resurfacing 2 Pala Community Park EA 2 4980.00 9960.00 Tennis Court Resurfacing 3 Pala Community Park EA 2 4600.00 9200.00 Basketball Court Resurfacin_ 4 Great Oak High School EA 8 5625,00 45000.00 Tennis Court Resurfacing 5 Erle Stanley Gardner EA 6 6000,00 36000,00 Middle School Tennis Court Resurfacing 6 Temecula Valley High EA 8 5895.00 47160.00 School Tennis Court Resurfacing 7 Ronald Reagan Sports EA 1 14500.00 14500.00 Park Hockey Rink Resurfacing 8 Margarita Community EA 2 4550.00 9100.00 Park Tennis Court Resurfacing 9 Margarita Community EA 1 12500.00 12500.00 Park Hockey Rink Resurfacing 10 Winchester Creek Park EA 1.5 6534.00 9800.00 Basketball Court Resurfacing W 02/27/2019 ITEM NO . 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve the Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement with Computer Alert Systems, Inc., for Fire and Security Alarm Monitoring Services for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Senior Management Analyst Stacey Biddle, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Annual Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Computer Alert Systems, Inc., in the amount of $10,000, for Fire and Security Alarm Monitoring Services for Fiscal Year 2018-2019. On July 1, 2018, the City Manager approved an annual agreement with Computer Alert Systems, Inc., to provide fire and security alarm monitoring, and repairs and maintenance services of City owned properties, in the amount of $30,000. Due to an increase in repairs, maintenance, and added alarm systems monitoring of various sites, it is necessary to increase the original agreement to continue services for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2018-19. Staff is recommending the approval of the amendment for the additional amount of $10,000, for a total agreement of $40,000 with Computer Alert Systems, Inc. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Department of Public Works, Facilities Maintenance Division Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2018-2019. ATTACHMENTS: First Amendment FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS, INC. FIRE AND SECURITY SYSTEMS MONITORING SERVICE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 23, 2019 by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Computer Alert Systems, Inc., a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2018, the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire and Security Systems Monitoring," in the amount of $30,000. b. The parties now desire to increase the payment in the amount of $10,000 and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The FIRST Amendment amount shall not exceed Ten Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($10,000), for additional fire and security systems monitoring for a total Agreement amount of Forty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($40,000). 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 04/18/2018 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: kit4v— .el 4t� Michael C Lynch, President CONTRACTOR Computer Alert Systems, Inc. Contact Person: Michael C. Lynch 27570 Commerce Center Dr., # 119 Temecula, CA 92590 Phone Number: (951)676-6880 mlynch@computeralertsystems.com PM Initial Date: 04/18/2018 Meeting Minutes A regular meeting of the board of director(s)/shareholder(s)/owner(s) Of a .: ti . tf�[.�-,1ttSa"ywas held i��r _IC_rt _ at , CX N'L (Alarm of GOInVany) � (f ale) (Time) The following individuals were present and participating at the meeting: With approval of the individuals present, r t it Ancd /�-. L-ywkacted as Chair [Name] of the meeting and - l�(IL� �ir�� U "' recorded the minutes. (Name) On motions duly made and seconded, it was voted that: 1. The following individuals were named to the following titles: d�ll�d,L t__„lu[ti (Names (Name) (N—) There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Approved._ ' u _ Name and Title 32368 (12/04) ITEM NO . 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with Falcon Engineering Services, Inc. for Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Civil Engineer Avlin R. Odviar, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with Falcon Engineering Services, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $150,000.00, to provide professional construction management services for the Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08. BACKGROUND: On November 15, 2016, the City Council approved the Agreement for construction management services on a time and materials basis, for an estimated amount of $3,015,147.60. The complexities of managing the project exhausted the estimated budget, and on November 27, 2018, the City Council approved the First Amendment to the Agreement in the amount of $300,000.00 for continued services through December 2018 and for one year thereafter for the plant establishment period. Inclement weather, additional work items, and extensive coordination with Caltrans on electrical, traffic signal, and ramp metering operations have extended construction activities and the management services. Contract work was complete in early April 2019, however additional changes may be necessary for final acceptance by Caltrans. This Second Amendment provides for continued construction management services through May 2019 including the plant establishment period April 2019 — April 2020, for an estimated amount of $150,000.00. We expect the final project cost to come in under budget, including this Amendment. FISCAL IMPACT: The Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal Years 2019-2023. The sources of funds for construction engineering include Senate Bill 621, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) pursuant to WRCOG Agreement 13-SW-TEM-1163, and Reimbursement/Lease pursuant to Lease Agreement with Front Street — Service Station, LP. There are sufficient funds available within the project account 210-265-662-5805 to cover the cost of the Amendment, $150,000.00 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Second Amendment 2. Project Description 3. Project Location SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND FALCON ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. INTERSTATE 15 / STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE, PW04-08 (CONTRACT NO. 16-229) THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 23, 2019 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Falcon Engineering Services, Inc., a California "S" Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). Inconsideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On November 15, 2016, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Consultant Services Between City of Temecula and Falcon Engineering Services, Inc.," in the amount of $3,015,147.60. b. On November 27, 2018, the City and Consultant entered into the First Amendment to "Agreement for Consultant Services Between City of Temecula and Falcon Engineering Services, Inc.," in the amount of $300,000.00. C. The parties now desire to increase the payment in the amount of $150,000.00 and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 6 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The SECOND Amendment amount shall not exceed One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($150,000.00) for additional construction management services, for a total Agreement amount of Three Million Four Hundred Sixty -Five Thousand One Hundred Forty -Seven Dollars and Sixty Cents ($3,465,147.60). 3. Exhibit "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 04/18/2018 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: Rand! Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney FALCON Engineering Services, Inc. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) 1 , ey. , . J Maha Faqih, President By: c L�, Wael Faqih, Vice President CONSULTANT FALCON Engineering Services, Inc. Wael Faqih, Vice President 341 Corporate Terrace, Suite 101 Corona, CA 92879 961-549-9600 wfagih@falcon-ca.com _ PM Initials: Date I FA 04/18/2018 ATTACHMENT A EXHIBIT B Attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full is the additional pricing as provided by the Consultant. 04/18/2018 O O p � p O � O kn O N O CD h O C 0) c Qi fib C lC C C f0 i U m 0 � C LL w y � U r a C d �� U � E .J C o V « U a E d — z a+ W C 7 0 E 4 a V] C "'r C C [,' _ ` W i` r —J �cc 4 L rw _J O 4r r V v *�� v ,�I u ti V� 'w •r 4i r n V p tN cOp O caD O O c�D p � tf) r M H if} �} M M O O CD �� O O 1� O lD f� F�- N � o O O o 0 p6p y o 0 0 � C M � CO r <D r � o M CO � Ft N cc o a 0 00 a ca o 0 0 o rn rn `r � a v crD, o � N T Qai caD cOD N � �N (A r V] r in In r Vl /n Efl In V3 f✓i 1n W W ra d � d d � H fJ Y D Y Q ❑ lE � _O C E 4 E C G U l0 10 T f0 V1 l6 O S !l 2 W N �Vi U a� d N � p c' U U �_ z 8E O 04/18/2018 �rrai d So,,� al,ro",la W no Country Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2019-23 INTERSTATE 15 / STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes right-of-way acquisition, design, environmental clearance, and construction of a ramp system that will improve access to Interstate15 from Temecula Parkway/State Route 79 South. The interchange will accommodate traffic generated by future development of the City's General Plan land use as well as regional traffic volume increases forecasted for the year 2037. This project is crucial, as the projected traffic volume increases currently exceed the capacity of the existing interchange improvements constructed by the Riverside County Transportation Department. Benefit / Core Value: This project will improve circulation, freeway access, and level of service at the Interstate 15 and Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South intersection. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: Environmental clearance was completed in 2010. Right -of -Way acquisition and utility easements were completed in 2013. Design and preparation of construction Plans, Specifications, and Estimate was completed in 2016. The construction contract was advertised and awarded in 2016-17. Construction of the interchange improvements started in June 2016 and are scheduled for completion in December 2018. This will be followed by a 1-year plant establishment period January 2019 through December 2019 and a 3-year maintenance period January 2020 through December 2022. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.165.662 PW04-08 Level: 2022-23 Project Cost: Prior Years FYE2018 2018-19 Projected Actual Carryover Adopted 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 and Future Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Years Cost Administration $ 1,150,801 $ 120,730 $ 175,000 $ 120,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ 1,726,531 Acquisition $13,032,881 $ 150,847 $13,183,728 Construction $ 6,653,410 $21,854,783 $28,508,193 Construction Engineering $ 1,255,284 $ 2,535,421 $ 520,572 $ 4,311,277 Design/Environmental $ 4,107,505 $ 120,423 $ 4,227,928 Totals $26,199,881 $24,782,204 $ 695,572 $ 120,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ - $51,957,657 Source of Funds: Prior Years FYE2018 2018-19 Actual Carryover Adopted 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost CFD (Crowne Hill) $ 502,211 $ 502,211 Reimbursement/ Other (Morgan Hill) $ 1,190,582 $ 1,190,582 SAFETEA-LUt11 $ 1,439,840 $ 1,439,840 Senate Bill621 $10,895,871 $ 2,667,077 $ 695,572 $ 120,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $14,538,520 STP (ROTC) (2) $ 2,256,752 $10,719,248 $12,976,000 TUMF (RCTC/Region)(3) $ 4,452,000 $ 4,452,000 TUMF (RCTC/CETAP)(4) $ 2,690,848 $ 2,709,152 $ 5,400,000 TUMF (WRCOG)(5) $ 2,512,137 $ 7,513,107 $10,025,244 Reimbursement/RCWD(6) $ 89,490 $ 191,070 $ 280,560 Reimbursement/EMWD(7) $ 170,150 $ 244,850 $ 415,000 Reimbursement/Lease(8) $ 737,700 $ 737,700 Total Funding: $26,199,881 $24,782,204 $ 695,572 $ 120,000 $ 80,000 $ 80,000 $ $51,957,657 Future Operation 8r Maintenance Costs: 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 $ 150,000 $ 153,000 $ 156,060 (1) SAFETEA-LU - Funding is pursuant to Authorization/Agreement Summary (E-76) (63.51 % of Federal Participating Costs, up to $1,439,840) (2) STP(RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to Authorization/Agreement Summary (E-76)(63.51 % of Federal Participating Costs, up to $12,976,000) (3) TUMF (RCTC/Region) - Funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No. 06-72-506 ($4,452,000 Total) (4) TUMF (RCTC/CETAP) - Funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No. 11-72-041-00 ($5,400,000 Total;$1,400,000 ROW;$4,000,000 CON). (5) TUMF (WRCOG)- Funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement 13-SW-TEM-1163($10,025,244 CON) (6) Pursuant to RCW D UA 23316 - RCW D shall reimburse City for actual costs of Additive Bid No. 01 ($280,560) (7) Pursuant to EMW D LA 23317 - EMW D shall reimburse City for actual costs of Additive Bid No. 02 ($415,000) (8) Revenues collected on Lease Agreement with Front Street - Service Station, LP dated September 11, 2013 (est. $740,000) ITEM NO . 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with T.Y. Lin International for the French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements — Phase II, PW 16-01 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Civil Engineer Kendra Hannah-Meistrell, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with T.Y. Lin International for the French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements — Phase II, PW 16-01, increasing the contingency amount by $150,000; 2. Increase the City Manager's authority to approve Extra Work Authorizations by $150,000. BACKGROUND: On October 25, 2016, the City Council approved the Agreement for the preparation of construction plans, specifications, and estimate (PS&E) for the project. Complex projects, such as this one, that involve coordination and consensus among multiple jurisdictions are dynamic. The ability to rapidly address scope of work revisions fosters a fast response to change. Approval of this Amendment will minimize delays by providing the City Manager the authority to address necessary increases in scope of work by an additional $150,000, which is above the previously authorized amount of $325,500. FISCAL IMPACT: The French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements — Phase II project is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Year 2019-23. The project is funded with General Fund, Measure S, TUMF (WRCOG), TUMF (CETAP/RCTC), SAFETEA-LU, and STIP. Adequate funds are available in the project accounts to cover the Second Amendment amount of $150,000, for a total Agreement amount of $4,478,083. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Second Amendment 2. Project Description 3. Project Location -tk I(a-,:?13 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/1-15 IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 23, 2019 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and T.Y. Lin International, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On October 25, 2016, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Consultant Services between City of Temecula and T.Y. Lin International, French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements - Phase II," in the amount of $3,947,823, plus contingency in the amount of $325,500. b. On February 12, 2019 the City and Consultant entered into the First Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Consultant Services between City of Temecula and T.Y. Lin International, French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Overcrossing and Interchange Improvements - Phase ll," to add scope of work and to increase the payment in the amount of $54,760. C. The parties now desire to increase the contingency in the amount of $150,000, and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 6 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Second Amendment amount shall not exceed One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000) of additional Contingency for additional work to be defined in Extra Work Authorizations) for a total Agreement amount of Four Million Four Hundred Seventy Eight Thousand Eighty Three Dollars ($4,478,083). 3. Section 6 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "b" is hereby amended to read as follows: Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's 04/18/2018 written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work up to Four Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($475,500) as approved by City Council. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 04/18/2018 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) rI _ By: Ja es L Rucker, Vice President Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT T.Y. Lin International Attn: Rodrigo Gonzalez 3633 East Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 900 Ontario, CA 91764 909-912-6903 rodrigo.gonzalez@tylin.com PM Initials: UV Date: 1 04/18/2018 CORPORATE AUTHORIZATION mewtucker. Vice Fr esident ofrr. +, yin I t rna ib;l , IXorlsomdon"j, a Californi�corpn ation. is a duly elected an alipomted officer of the Corporation a d Id I ca orate authority n enier�inta g antra pose and execute Bid Forms on behalf of the Corporation. In witness whereof, I have caused this instrument to be executed and the corporate seal to be hereunto affixed on the 20 day of January 2019. T.Y. Lin International By: - Veronica e;znie Assistant Secretary I I as _t C{ Capital Improvement Program th.H '.1' hernCi01O'N. Fiscal Years 2019-23 Wino c-"y FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY / I - 15 IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road Interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the 1-15/1-215 junction with connectors to 1-15 and 1-215. Benefit / Core Value: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the Citys northern area by providing the northbound collector/distributer road system. In addition, this project satisfies the Citys Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The environmental re-evaluation and design are estimated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2019-20. Department: Public Works- Account No.210.165.726 PW16-01(Ref:PW02-11) Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years FYE 2018 2018-19 2022-23 Actual Carryover Adopted 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 Projected and Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Future Years Cost Administration $ 2,207,098 $ 225,701 $ 227,000 $ 227,000 $ 227,000 $ 227,000 $ 133,000 $ 3,473,799 Acquisition $ 9,393,251 $4,069,870 $ 990,000 $ 14,453,121 Caltrans Oversight $ 671,000 $ 6,140,000 $ 6,811,000 Construction $ 41,500,000 $ 41,500,000 Construction Engineering $ 830,000 $ 830,000 Design/Environmental $14,527,875 $3,333,613 $ 17,861,488 Utilities $ 1,993 $ 1,993 Totals $26,130,217 1 $7,629,184 1 $ 898,000 1 $ 49,687,000 1 $ 227,000 1 $ 227,000 $ 133,000 $ 84,931,401 Prior Years FYE 2018 2018-19 Source of Funds: Actual Carryover Adopted 2019-20 2020.21 2021-22 2022-23 Total Project Expenditures Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost General Fund q1 $ 3,702,784 $ 563,390 $ 4,266,174 CFD (Harveston) $ 1,005,840 $ 1,005,840 DIF (Street Improvements) $ 75,360 $ 75,360 Federal Highway Administration $ 8,000 $ 8,000 Measure A (Local Streets and Roads) $ 1,627,914 $ 1,627,914 Measure S $ 227,000 $ 227,000 $ 1,155,640 $ 1,609,640 Reimbursements/ Other (Land Donation) $ 6,000,000 $ 6,000,000 SAFETEA-LU $ 671,000 $ 931,360 $ 1,602,360 STIP Augmentation $ 37,600,000 $ 37,600,000 STIPM $ 10,000,000 $ 10,000,000 TUMF (RCTC)'3' $ 2,343,000 $ 2,343,000 TUMF(WRCOG)'"' $ 7,521,691 $3,568,169 $ 11,089,860 TUMF (WRCOG)() $ 3,211,199 $ 507,545 $ 3,718,744 TUMF(WRCOG)I61 $ 59,015 $1,865,985 $ 1,925,000 TUMF (CETAP/WRCOG)''1 $ 348,414 $1,124,095 $ 1,472,509 Unspecified''' $ 227,000 $ 227,000 $ 133,000 $ 587,000 Total Funding: $26,130,217 $7,629,184 1 $ 898,000 1 $ 49,687,000 $ 227,000 1 $ 227,000 $ 133,000 $ 84,931,401 Future Operation 8r Maintenance Costs: 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 $ 15,000 (1) General Fund Includes Required Contribution match for TUMF(CETAP/RCTC) funds. (2) State Transportation Improvement Program -2014 RCTC Call for projects as approved by the Commission on November 13, 2013($10,000,000). (3) TUMF (RCTC)- Regional funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No. 06-72-048-00 for a total of $7,517,000($5,517,000-ROW; $2,000,000-PS&E). $200,000 City Match, Phase I expended $3,174,000-ROW; $2,000,000 PS&E; $200,000 City Match. Phase II expended $2,343,000 ROW. (4) TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 06-SW-TEM-1079 for a total of $11,575,000 reduced to $11,451,875($975,752-PA&ED; $8,801,875- PS&E; $1,674,248-ROW) for Phase I and Phase 11. (5) TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $4,078,000 reduced to $4,043,000 ($108,724 PA&ED;3,934,296 PS&E) for Phase I and Phase 11. (6) TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $1,925,000-ROW. No expenditures for Phase I. (7) TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to the RCTC Agreement No. 17-73-007-00 in the amount of $1,472,509 ($673,562 ROW; $798,947 DESIGN; $106,603 City Match). (8) Project cannot be constructed until a funding source is identified. 55 FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/1-15 IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project Location MURRIETP HOT SPRINGS . GENE ST" -vim. yP-} of S , �Pi1`�L L NON p F£ O � SO p FLL try � 9 01 4� N *emu O ; J � — 'S' 7-R S9 ; 4 try', •' Aerial Data - 2015 0 750 1,500 54 'tint Feet 3,000 ITEM NO . 16 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve Parcel Map 37021 (Located at the Northeast Corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road) PREPARED BY: Ron Moreno, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreements for the tract and accept the Faithful Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond as security for the agreements; and 2. Approve Parcel Map 37021 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval with TriPointe Homes, a Delaware Corporation. BACKGROUND: Parcel Map 37021 has been approved for subdivision to create two individual parcels for condominium purposes. The property covered by this Parcel Map is located at the northeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road. The Parcel Map subdivides Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 8856 as shown in Book 41, Pages 72 and 73 of Parcel Maps on file with the County of Riverside. Securities have been posted for the public improvements and monumentation as conditioned by the approval of Tentative Map 37021 by the planning commission on September 5, 2017. The property owner/developer has met the terms of the Conditions of Approval for map recordation, and this Parcel Map is in conformance with the approved Tentative Parcel Map. The approval of a Subdivision Map, which substantially complies with the approved Tentative Parcel Map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fees and Securities Report 2. Vicinity Map 3. Parcel Map 37021 (reduced copy) CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP 37021 Date: April 23, 2019 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE LABOR & MATERIALS SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage $268,500 $134,500 Improvements Monumentation Security Monumentation has $7,000.00 been set DEVELOPMENT FEES RCWD&WCD (ADP) Fee Paid Development Impact Fees To Be Paid SERVICE FEES: Planning Fee $ 774 Fire Fee $ 284 CSD Fee $ 1,345 Plan Check Fee $ 4,043 Fees Paid To Date $ 6,614 Balance of Fees Due $ 0 THOMAS BROS. GUIDE PAGE 979, GRID C-4 2006 EDITION SEC. 19&20, T.BS, R.2W TFtii TEMECULA LN CANTERFIELD DR a SITE 15 9 JP 9 A z LOMA LINDA RD VICINITY MAP N. T. S. xux6w rx NUMBErEn Los - z IN THE CRY OF TEMEC" COIMII' OF RIVERSIDE SLATE OF CAUFORNN "DUMBER CF ItTiEHED LOrs - TRACT NOW 3700 NWBERD LOT NET ARG - 10.OB ACPES rorM owss ARG - zl.w ACRES rorM xuMeER a caaoMx9uM uYs - zu BEING A SUBDMSION OF PARCELS 1 AND 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. W56 AS SHOWN BY MAP FILED IN BOOK 41, PACES )I ANO 73 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RNERSIDE COUNTY, GIJFORNIA adkan Any Z0/ ENG/VEERS FOR OWNER'S STATEMENT M£ NBdBY BTAIE MIT W£ ARE TE I- OF TE —I aCWCED WRNN ME SUBMNS H THOWIr A—IM TNT WE ARE TIE OVLY PERSONS MIIOSE CCHSENr Is AIEaBSW/ ro R155 A CI EAR M(E ro SxD UAB: TNT WE CNYSINT ro TE YAAiNO AND RECOROWG a rH6 SUBDMSKW YW A,______ w HERRBY _R, ro PUBLIC USE AY SIREN AND PUBLIC ULXJT' PLWPOSES GIST LOrs A' (iFMECl/U UW J AND 5" (dN NN IMtl). wE xeaBr DETAGtE AaRLETS RKAHTs a ACCESS Moxc rEcxAwrN rMnnRlr ro nTE nlalc. nrE owxlxs a Lot , A6urtMs rllrs H9aaWr AxD aRxc sLw nYE xnL FMSE xD 16arrs G Acm Fxcwr nE alYxaL FAYLIXf a TRIAII. Aw clLwcE a ,ux.WLl[Nr DR WwTH nor RErxrs M TFE INDITKw nETEOF sFNu TEnuANIs nRs ttolclTaN As ro nIE PART IxcvEn AS A Lda11pN (X OFA'GMAV IIF LOT A, (TEEIECULI LAW) ANO LOT V, (lOY1 N N RGOf, ilE OWid'RS OF LOT f AE1/I1MG TILSE 141dIIWYS AHO WRMC Saa r1YE aLL INN: AO RN TWtPm r ALf65 EYLEPr 111E fdmW. GSEIIElr a iPAMI. AL50 IXCEPIW.G Or1E TMPIY-MI TOOT (J2i Np wrFiY (SOT ACCESS OPE)ID1C fOR LOl 1. AS SIpIM HEAEON. AW aANlrf a MIfMYENT oR WmM nNr REsars a nrE MrITaN nE>tEOF sILYL TEm9MIiE n9s coTlanax a ACaSS sans ro ME PART IWCITn THERM PItOHRiY DESCMBEO BFLOW rs RETNIIEO M FEE FOR PRMIIE PURPOSES LOT 2 ANTFR a1NUT' BAS91', AS SIaM lYRFDN, EDR THE 501E BEOLI OF aaSEVq OUR SUCCESSOI6, ASSYaE6 AND La OaYRS MRIpN iH5 rR.1Cr wP. W CHR6MN OANffL LARSEN, ASSISt i SECRET W RICK M. WOOD, VICE NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT AST RUC QipTRA aiKER Cpx'(£fMG T6 fFRiMAE YEA46 ONLY TE ATTACHED, AND NOT W rMIiWFl LWn ACaIRICY, OROR VAUd1Y OF TNT OOCIMIEw. rs STATE M CAUFiMR61 CONTY Hx al BEFASE IE RIEaM(LY APPFAI3➢ n1E FEwe(s) WIII PROVED ro 11E ON TxE BAvs a 51/bFACLORY ENaNLE ro eE Rsox(s) WIK15E we(s)Is/Ms suascRmm to nc anxx aSaaOlr ANO AtlOpMID.{^ 0 m ME nNT HE/SHFfHEY EJELUim n1E STYE M HLS/IIER/III i� PTRsav(s) ACTm ExEnnrn � . ME MSTRrIwvr WrERSON(sA M rTR IIE nc ENTITY oral EETav 1 CIXaY UNDER —TY G PERJURY UNDER 111E UXS G IIR: STATE W GVMDRHAI TINT iNE iadaMNC PAwaAPN S TRLE ANO C09iECT. WRNF15 W HIN'0 //a CFFICNL SELL Paver NAPE svunRTE AYIT,AR/ flla.C, SY1E a G a9111fS5pN HD: _ W COYW53Wa IXPMtES L'OUInY a PRaCW.LL PUCE Di BUSaE55 —I Gu9uaal C01MTa pV 6vEwE AL RR90NMJ.Y AAFAIED IWII flV1ED ro YE ON 1EE Bt95 OF SAI6FACIaM flOBKE 10 BE TK PE IIIEY WNDSE NAAE(5) 6/AAE 1HDVI7ED 10 TE MRNN a5murtxr AM AC-T RY rFD TO YE TNT IE/SNEATK:Y EAEar1m i1ff SIrY: M IRS/HER/TOR AUTKIN® - PERS mr ) ACTED � TE . nY MSTMMw nK HRS SA M n1E Exnn IMaI %IWf 1 CERIM' UNDER PFHILIY OF PERIURi UNDER TIE UWS K TIE STATE OF GIIFOaA1 TNT rNE FOPECOINO P.KYMtWN 5 TRUE ANO CORRECT. WRFLS w HrIN'0 AFID aFCNL SELL PaIJr NAPE SK:N1TaE NOTA4Y PIAiLC, saa a G COA9995AM M0.: _ w rsuwssrorJ pP9R.c mlMn 6 PRaCNAt PLACE ai BU9WE59 F9Cd:(_�i❑:7� ]'i6i9C•l:F� ,woro sECaa eeue cF nE sueaYmav YW Acr, nE sAaunAas rr nE FDUDaxc OWRWRs DF c uMETTrs MR orrxR Ixrmcsrs INAE eml a9nm.' SaRHERN CALRGSWN Eases, COMPANY A COFPoRIIYML HIOIDfR a AH GSEl1IXf fO.S PUaJC UIXfl16 AIa 9.CXXNf Pu1WY1SE5 PER DocuYENr RECOItOFD wr 16, zarJ As DocuuErJr Aa zaD)-JxeeD a aETcw. REmRos 5'aT1Oa G4kORNN EaSar COYPM'Y. A CORPORI1pN. {TOILER a AH FASE11IXf iDR PUBLIC ULR = MGR65, AHD ECRLSS Ma a AL PURPOSES. RTL\PCFO JUNF I5, IHRI AS MSiRU11ENr NJ. B18BJ G aTCNL RIZWII . Cm a TEEIECNA "OINK OF A $RaY OP.19I FASEYEW, PER OOLUYQIT REa1SfD MI. AS DoaaDVT xa a aFKAIL REmeos FASTRN YaXCFAL W M DaTMCT, NBIILER W A SEWER FASEAEW. TER CNAAIENT gE0p1®EO DECQRER 10. .1. AS DOCUwWT ax Mf8-04BTOOB w OFFICAN. RECQWS. SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT SHEET I OF 5 SHEETS RECORDER'S STATEMENT Fff THIS —NY DF , E019 AT—.M., IN B00K OF ANDS, AT PAGES AT THE REOU6r OF THE Cm CLERK. CITY OF TEMECUU FEE N0. PETER ALDANA ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK- RECORDER BY.. , DEPUTY SUBDMSMN GUARANU FIRST AMERICW W COMP.INY CONFDRMMICE WffH TIE REWIREMEHIS OF ME SUBOMSION MW ACi ,INO LOCM ORO8IANCE AT THE REM-T ANIMEN IMNOSION OF RIOCECRESI RGL LSTAtE ON ALANLYI IY .11 1 HEREBY S M TNr ALL YONUYEWS ARE OF THE CHAINCTER MID OCCUPY TE POSITIONS INNaCArED OR THAT MEY WNL BE SET M ACCOR0.INCE MrTH TIE TERMS OF ME AIONU.MEM ACREFAY]? FOR TE LLIP AND TNT — IIONUME'RS ARE, OR WNL 6E SUFF HT ro EHABIE iFK SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. ANO TNT T,S FMM MW S ANMLLY cnNFDRMs ro nHE cnNarlaNur APPROvm rtM nvE MAP. rxrs sulrvEY rs TRUE ,wD coMPTrrE As swwN. GTE �Q LAND SG EW P. Aa(ISON Ls. SS90 2S �IELL .PG IXPXN110N G1E 8�)O-ZO � � � o is sYn � EIN. 9-30-10 �� ff G1\Edl\e CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I —STATE TNT TWS AAIP CON56TNO N. FDE (s) SHEETS HlS BEIOr E.CWWIED W ME OR UNOEA w SUPERvrs10rT AND f'OIRYD R ro � SUBSTANfNLLY ME SAYE AS ? APPFAREO OA' TIE tENTAr1A'E NIP OF rRICi NO Jro81 AS FlIID AND APPROAED W rFl Cm OF TEMECUTA ON SEITEYEIER 5, 20f ). ilK IXWRArpN GTE BEING SEPIEMBER 3, ZOZO. TN1 ALL PRONSIa15 OF MPLIGBIE STATE UW AND CNA' REGUU1Ka5 /AIK BEEN mMPLIm wLT4 AND 1 AM sAnsFTm txlr I AY sAtsFTED txrs ANP Is tEcxNlrwrLr cORREct. GiEO i1R5 NY OF .1. Far PALRrcx A naAus. rm ENC9HER U10 KRrs RF LS BZM�V^` r,P, ! ,OELE61iED) Dfl1 9 i CITY CLERKS STATEMENT THE Cm LYRINLYL OF THE Cm OF RNECI" STATE OF Cwro k W lIS Cm CLERK. PANG JOHL HEREBY APFRO4E5 TIE ?RAC/ YIP AND ACCEPTS r11E OFiI)r OF OEOIGTION OF EASEYEW FOR WBIJC ROAD ANO PU%IC IFTIffY PURPOSES OVER L015 APROYEAIENfS CONSMUCTED IN ACCORLWHCE WRH fJiY S/ANDIRDS. WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT TK aliRS OF OEDIGiN)N OF ABUTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALQNO P£CI41NG4 WAY. TA1E _ UHE AND — LING RND AS OEDIGiED. w HEREBY ANAU)H. PI HT HT ro SFC 6B 4(9) OF THE SUBOMSIO 1 MW ACT. LOr -C- I —ATE) ro THE PUBLIC FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES ON PARCEL ANP NO. BBSB, PMB 41/M-73, RECORDS OF RNERSIDE COUNY GU —A TNT IS NOT SHOWN WrTHa "HE BOUNDMO' OF Mrs YAP AS OEOIGTED. GTEO: W' qm CIFRK, CITY OF TEI/Ecuu/SECRETARY, TEMECUu COMYUNm sERNCES ,XSiA4Ci. I IEAFBY CERaY MIT A @M'D M IK SLY OF I Ht5 fiEEN EXEL'ULED //a Txm WIM THE BOwo OF SURANSCRS OF TIE Ca.MY G alERSK L'WRRft CCNOTIJIRD UPoN TK PAYMENT WALL to STATE COIM'il; MuraWw, OR LacN, Ax0 ALL SPEWI. ASSE59QR5 OaLECTEO AS TMR; WIrKL Ar TE TIME trF FNrNC w — YA^ MRH TIE COUNTY RELMCER ARE A LOT ANW57 SAD aICARRTY BIB Na YET PA—E ANO SND BONG HNS [ dAY GTE Bag CNMTY lAY (bLL£CTOR W: . DEPIm TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY ERrIfY' MIT ACCORgNG ro 114E RECORDS OF TINS aFH;, AS OF Mrs GTE. MERE ARE NO LIENS ACAaST TIE PROPERLY SNOIIN aH TE WlMIN YIP FOR UNPNO SiA1E, COUNTY, MUNIGPK, OR LaAL iMfES, WWA Iff ASSESSIIINfS LTRIECIED AS ?AYES. EXCEPT TAXES Olt SP£CNL ASSESSMENTS COUECIED AS TAKES NOA W1 BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHIC14 ARE ESTWTEO ro BE J GTE NOTICE OF DRAINAGE FEES NOTICE 5 IIQSBY CNEN TINT r146 FRORRD' f5 LOG11E0 M 11Y YURMETA CREEIf/TEIELY/L1 VNJEY DR.IWNOE PLW II111L14 WIs AOOPiFO W txE eaMm a srIPEnAsola a nTE calxrr G R1WxsroE flaSLLNff ro sEDt10x lazs a oRORLNT¢ 480 AND s60nox 6srBx Ei sEa rr ME cOVETWxmB ma ANO trur sw PRorrntt Hs srIBRDr ro FEES TOR sw OP.IAWLE ARFA NOrKY 5 FURTHER CAOI TNT, PURSLLWr ro SELIIOx 10.93 OF OM8pV4CE 4R0. PAYYEM a rNE ORNRNOE FQS SNW. r[ PAID YnH cESI1ERs a[cK m AlaxEr oRaR oar ro nE LCLWIY G RAERsmE FIDOO aanwL Avo NITR CCNSERNIaa O6T9CT AT 111E rW1E OF 5CYNLE Di TIE r98108TG OR B1MDaG PERENf FOR SIM PARCELS, Wi11CNEVFR P£RMf. SITYL GY 111E FEE REOUaED Ai TC RAT" M EFFECT Ai TE LIEIE OF b51MACE OF 111E ACT1LL PEFMR. SOILS REPORT A PMEAIaARI' SLWJ REPOT WAS PREPASED FOR T6 SUBOM1I9ON BY r;OLCN WEST, XIC. ON WRCN e, Ta6 AS REpAREO W THE IIGLM ANO SIFETY LOGE a THE STATE fK GUfOIMR� SECaa 1)BSJ. PRQ&Z7 D SECTION 19 h 20 T.BS, R.2W. S.B.M. uwnoRs O -NDGAIES SET IN M LS 6580 TAD, ft15H -NNDAlES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ■-ND'GTES FOLND 1-1/2' COPPERHEAD MONUMENT STAMPED M1S 4 7*, FLUSH PER ME 421/28-3B RI-ND'C1TES RECORD DATA PER PM NO. 8856. PMB 41/72-73 R2-NDCAlES RECORD DATA PER 7 W. 21067. ME 201/41-48 RJ-ND'C1TES RECORD DATA PER IF W. 319M, VB 421/2B-M R4-NDCIIW RECORD DATA PER CRY OF TEMECMA FEmLUTKKI ND 05-71 RAM--ND'C1TES RECORD AND MEASURED DATMA NDOIlES S6NCFEU, NOIHNC FOUND -NDG11E5 P6IRMRD ACCESS THIS MAP CONTAINS 21.64 ACRES CROSS WITHIN THE 016RNCTH£ BORDER ALL MONR/AIQTS SET PER Rn£R90E COUNTY ORdNANCE 46111 ARO THE IONUNOIf ACREdQlI FOR 11N5 W. CCAR'S FOR THIS MAP RECORDED AS HST. NO O.R., RIAERSOE OOUW LOT 1 6 ID BE USED FOR A TOTAL OF 248 OONDD MNOM LINTS AS DEFINED N SECBDV I150 ET SEC. OF THE = COVE OF W STALE OF CMk3RNA1 AND 5 FLED PURSUAf" TO THE SVWMSOq MAP ACE VICINITY MAP T. IN 7W Cm OF 7ENECU A , CW" OF RhERSM SrATE OF CV&V MM TRACT NO.37021 BOND A SUBDMSON OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 OF PARCEL AMP NO. BB56 AS SHOWN BY MAP FILED N BOOK 41, FADES 72 AND 73 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIYERSIOE COUNTY, CALIFORNK adkan ' NE P017 E N01-.8 FOR P14WG= NW DPNIMCE EASEMENTS SHILL BE KEPT FREE OF BUNDRLGS AND OBSMWWNS. E�p��AL L�NS�rNT � qy FM[ RooNNI INET, NO lY iXE CRT' L COL w IN EG£ GPS CONTROL DAGRW NOT TO S SHEET 2 E 5 SHEETS SOUTHERN 04L FORW EDISON COMPANY, A CORPoRIINN HOLDEN OF AN © E4SEl01f FOR PUBLIC DAIRIES AND NA7DENTAL PURPOSES PER DOCUMENT RREECOORDMAY 16. 2007 AS DOMIMENT NO. 2007-526680 OF OFFICIAL SOURNRN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. A CORPORATION HOLDER OF AN ®EISEAffNf FDR PUBLIC UININES, INDFEss ANO EGRESS AND HICIOENTAL P RECORDED JUKE 15, 1976 AS INSTRUMENT W. 84M OF OFFICIAL RANCHO GAf=PI WATER OIBIRILT, TOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR FPE11NE5 © AND IAOO OFFICIAL- RECORDS RECORDED SEPmIBER 1, 1976 AS NSRHIYEM N0. 1.w7zs of oFFTaAt RECORDS. 0 CITY OF TEMECULA, FOLDER OF A S!P%1 BRAN EASEMENT, PER DOCUMENT RECORDED T019 AS DOGUNENI NO. of oFFTCML RELYIRDS. ®EASTERN MUNOIPAL WATER 05TMCf HOLDER OF A SEWER EASEMENT, PER DOCUMENT RECORDED DECEYBER Ib, 2018 AS DOCUMENT NO 2018-0180008 OF OFFOMI. RECORDS. W THE CRY OF M ECULA COIMI Y OF RhOtM STALE OF GALIFOM141 TRACT W0. 370M BONG A SUBDMSION CF PARCELS 1 AND a GF WACEL MAP NO. BBSB AS SHOW IW NAP FILED IN BOOK 41. PAGES 7 A- 73 OF PARCEL NAPS, RECORDS OF RNERSIOE COUN Y CALIFORNIA. adkmn FM oa DCUMM FUWOM JIM 2017 E 01... RB SEEDRJN40E E2 FOR R SHAM! BE NEW FREE OF BUXO MS AND OBSTRUCTIONS. SEE SHEET 1 FOR SURAINT S NOTES. ENNRONNENOT CONSTRAINT OF NOTE. ANO OPS NOTES. BASIS OF BEARRNS AND GPS CONTItq. DB4RAN 0 GRAPHIC SCALE ,OD O b 1W IOD AOD ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 100 R. I — TO IS TW T. DAs°NNNoihdH� jor \ II }ER I \'C L III \ I` I' �w Tit - - II I PAMCL 1 I DARCF HAP No. N1 All 72-T: I _ I PALA PARK \ \ TSB .F\\ C M8 N. 01Q Ri239 J hVay+,y SHEET 3 OF S SHEETS 1 W ME CRY OF TEWECt" COINW OF RIPE MM STATE OF CVAMV N TRACT NO.37021 ORARUCE EASE]AEN� 516LLL E RETT WNG A SMOAA M OF PARCELS 1 AND 1 a PARCEL W W. M6 AS SHORN B W FRID FREE OF BUIIfNIMS AND DBSIRUCIpNS. IN BOON 41, PAGES ]Y AND 13 OF PARCEL. A ,, RECORDS OF RA'ERSIDE COUNTY, CW Nk Am 2017 Kan SEE SHEET Y FOR SORYLI S MMZ$, ad FM� p� ENNRIXINENTAL CPVSLWYN! HOLE. EASEMW 19MMM MOFBEIRILMS E NG / N E E R S DEEW (fRDEI SHEET S) SCALE n) SEE SHEET 3 SHEET / OF 3 SHEETS W ME CRY OF TEWECt" COINW OF RIPE WK STATE OF CAL MVM TRACT NO.37021 kw BEING A SUBOAA M CF PARCELS I AND 1 OF PARCEL WP W. M6 AS SHORN BY ANP FRID ORAGNOE EitSEwEMS S BE KEPT IN BOOK 41, PAGES ]Y ANB 13 OF PARCEL ANDS• RECORDS OF RM1'ERSIDE XtAm• CAl NtA. mEE of BIRIDAVf.S ANO �. adKan Am =O„ SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURYEI'OR5 NOi6, EHwRGNwEHru coHsmaHr Ho¢ E N G/ N E E R S FOR Canorwr FUro s d�ENsr �wrNcs (mow sT¢ET a) n M PAU PARK I DIf BB TRACT KO e �r \ ` i 10 / ct` aA SHEET 5 OF 3 SHEER Q GRAPHIC SCALE 40 0 30 b 60 160 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch 40 ft. ",yli' uAl*\ _ r.�1. A AT RE I A I� GI. I j>rr y� I — as we zn/4r-Aa 1 �N6rnmir ee.arxi! Isa�oro•'arau "��J IW �a �.�.E� xsma m. esYw a6aL =' lL -6�s � I arr46• 'w°.' wnR�psvls BA91 ARFA�g466 SF. s am LION & A— —18).68 �= 6—NsrrnsY 4 aP (N6S5f'A6'N 841.]ORr}- , � Nuraio?ir6uy. ar ` 10►'A' MARCEL 1 PANG L MAP NO. OW PIRf349 /i2-SN AWaFO 9ACRE kY Mir I ac I.T661r •R1 — 1114 1 1 1 1 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET W THE CRY OF TEMEM" COIMW OF RNM= STALE OF Collil" NM TRACT W0.37021 BONG A SUBOMSION O PARCELS 1 AND a GF PANCEI. I W. &156 AS SHOW BY YAP fBED IN BOOK 41. PAGES T ANO )J OF PARCEL YAPS, RECORDS O RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CAUFMR adkan AM 8D1 DRAMAGE EISEMENIS SNAIL BE KEPT FREE OF BUNIKNGS AND 09SfRI1CR01S. i1F5 FRDPDTIY b IOGITEO ARH JO VIES OF 1gYR PALOIYR N CBSFRNIRAM. All PRQ°OSED pRP00R UpIiNG 515IBAi 9NlL CGYPLY NRN RE C1LsomaA NSTIIUIE O RIIIpL m PA1nYR GesEAtwTarn RErnsoEYTYNs. Glmruxr[ xa axx flAARGN1IXTAl YPKT 12PGPT iBw ND. ME WJ XMT PMPAAm iOR TIAS HKAECT YAl 6 OH iEE AT BE CRY tK AT GRAPHIC SCALE taxcwA FIAIM/G onulax. 11LS PMA[LT 6 RIIIAN A IObYEAR fUIOD HA]ARO ZdE 1 W O 'JO 1 W IOD AOD R6 PAO.EGT 6 .RIAV A UgIEFACIKH N1lAl0 ZONE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 100 H. \ \ PALA PARK \ LfBY SB PA��E0.9 I �i AE— — — J Ia�Anffx� E X / PeAWE6 NEAP NO. M SHEET I OF I SHEETS WWr A. ITEM NO . 17 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Establish All -Way Stop Control at the Intersection of Del Rey Road at Avenida Buena Suerte PREPARED BY: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer II - Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ESTABLISHING AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF DEL REY ROAD AT AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE AND FINDING THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15301(C) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES BACKGROUND: A request was received to consider the feasibility of implementing traffic calming measures to reduce excessive vehicular speeds on Del Rey Road and Via Norte in the Meadowview community including the use of roadway striping, VCalm speed display signs and all -way stop controls to provide right-of-way assignment and address visibility constraints at various intersections on both streets. In October 2018, a review of conditions was performed that included a sight distance analysis, traffic count data collection at five (5) locations, evaluation of entering volumes at five (5) intersections, and completion of an all -way stop warrant analysis. Since Del Rey Road and Via Norte function as Residential Collectors, the Multi -Way Stop Sign Installation Policy for Residential Streets warrant criteria was used to evaluate the need for all -way stop controls at the five (5) intersections. The warrant analysis performed found that existing volumes are lower than the applicable criteria and all -way stop controls are not justified based on traffic volumes. However, the policy also provides the flexibility to consider all -way stop controls if there is a need to provide right-of-way control to eliminate vehicular conflicts due to visibility constraints. Based on this criteria, the warrant analysis found there is justification for all -way stop controls at the following three (3) intersections: • Del Rey Road at Avenida Buena Suerte • Via Norte at Carmelita Circle West • Via Norte at Avenida Centenario The results of the all -way stop warrant analysis along with proposed roadway striping traffic calming features were presented at the Meadowview Homeowners Association meeting in February 2019. The majority of residents in attendance agreed with the recommended all -way stop controls and striped traffic calming features. Staff advised the residents that the roadway striping traffic calming features and all -way stop controls could be implemented with the Meadowview Pavement Rehabilitation Project scheduled to begin in early summer 2019. At their meeting of March 28, 2019, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered the three (3) recommended all -way stop controls and recommended roadway striping traffic calming features. Based on input received from Meadowview residents in attendance, the Commission approved a modified recommendation (4-0-1) that the City Council adopt a resolution establishing all -way stop control at Del Rey Road at Avenida Buena Suerte only. The Commission also recommended that the Via Norte at Avenida Centenario and Camino Cannelita West intersections be re-evaluated after implementation of the recommended roadway striping traffic calming features. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Department of Public Works, Traffic Division's Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2018-19 for the installation of signs and associated pavement markings. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Location Map RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ESTABLISHING AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF DEL REY ROAD AT AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE AND FINDING THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 15301(C) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has considered the facts justifying the need for stop signs at the location described in this resolution. A. The City Council hereby finds and determines the installation of the stop signs pursuant to this resolution will enhance public health, safety and general welfare at the intersection. B. The City Council hereby finds the proposed stop signs will not create any adverse conditions in the area and the action is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15301(c) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the following All -Way Stop Intersection is hereby established in the City of Temecula: Del Rey Road at Avenida Buena Suerte PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of April, 2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 19- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 711E CITY OF TEMECULA LOCATION MAP T 41 `fill. � .k _ � •.r, � * y �► �V w ' ARMELITA CIRCLE WEST . � �' .-�; � ,• AVENIDA BUENA SUERTE' ,ti Y :f ,367.8 0 1,183.88 2,367.8 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site al is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not I ✓GS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere accurate, current, or otherwise reliabl 1 Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATIO Legend Parcels Highways HWY . INTERCHANGE . INTERSTATE OFFRAMP ONRAMP . USHWY Street Names ❑ Parks ❑ Schools Hospitals Public Facilities City of Temecula Boundary Streets <all other values> <Null> COLLECTOR FREEWAY LIMITED SECONDARY ARTERIAL LOCAL MAJOR ARTERIAL MODIFIED SECONDARY ARTERL NO CLASSIFCATION ASSIGNED NO CLASSIFICATION ASSIGNED Notes TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT - CONSENT ITEM NO . 18 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 9, 2019 CALL TO ORDER at 7:46 PM: President James "Stew" Stewart ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 13. Approve the Action Minutes of March 26, 2019 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of March 26, 2019. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Schwank. The electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:46 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 23, 2019, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. James Stewart, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] ITEM NO . 19 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement for Consultant Services with RJM Design Group, Inc. in the Amount of $256,200 for the Completion of a Community Services Master Plan and Appropriate $26,200 from Measure S Funds to Cover Contracted Amount and Reimbursable Expenses PREPARED BY: Erica Russo, Community Services Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve agreement for consultant services with RJM Design Group, Inc. in the amount of $256,200 plus a contingency amount of $20,000 for the completion of a Community Services Master Plan; 2. Appropriate $26,200 from Measure S funds to cover partial contract amount of $6,200 and reimbursable expenses not to exceed $20,000. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula's original Parks and Recreation Master Plan was completed in 1993. At that time the City's population was approximately 32,000; there were five developed parks and seven undeveloped sites. The 1993 Parks and Recreation Master Plan projected to the year 2013, and focused primarily on planning, acquisition, and development of new parks as the City was still largely undeveloped. Addenda to the original Master Plan include Youth Master Plan (2008), Community Playbook for Youth with Special Needs (2012), Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan (2016), and the Senior Services Master Plan (2017). The Community Services Department released a Request for Proposals via Planet Bids to solicit proposals for completion of a comprehensive Community Services Master Plan. Three firms submitted proposals (Pros Consulting Inc., KTUA, and RJM Design Group Inc.). A panel of five staff members from the Community Services, Community Development, and Public Works Departments reviewed all three proposals on the criteria of Technical Approach, Completeness and Level of Detail, Qualifications, Experience with Comparable Projects, and Clarity of Proposal. Based on the outcome of this review process, the panel elected to interview the top two proponents, KTUA and RJM Design Group Inc. Following lengthy panel interviews in which each proponent presented their project team and approach, the evaluating panel selected RJM Design Group, Inc. as the successful proponent. Staff therefore recommends approval of this agreement for consultant services with RJM Design Group in order to create a comprehensive Community Services Master Plan that will assess all existing facilities, programs, and services from the perspective of the current and evolving needs of the community based on the City's priorities, available and projected funding, and evolving demographics. The Master Plan will address current and future (5-20 years) needs of the community via this baseline assessment, analysis, recommendations, and a final report. The process will take approximately 12 months. Throughout the process, RJM Design Group will engage the community and key stakeholders, refer to the City of Temecula's Quality of Life Master Plan, and reflect the values and wishes of its residents. FISCAL IMPACT: The total fiscal impact of the Community Services Master Plan will be $256,200, of which $250,000 has been appropriated from Measure S as part of the Fiscal Year 2019-23 Community Services Master Plan CIP. Staff is requesting an additional appropriation from Measure S of $26,200 ($6,200 to cover the cost of the contract and $20,000 to cover potential reimbursable expenses per the terms of the contract). ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. COMMUNITY SERVICES MASTER PLAN THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 23, 2019, between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and RJM Design Group, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on April 23, 2019, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2020, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City may, upon mutual agreement, extend the contract for one (1) additional one (1) year term. In no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2021. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Two Hundred, Fifty Six Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars and Zero cents ($256,200.00), plus reimbursable expenses as approved by the General Manager or designee not to exceed Twenty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($20,000.00) for a total agreement amount of Two Hundred, Seventy Six Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($276,200.00) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the General Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by General Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. 03/11 /2019 C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of Fifty Dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the General Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to 03/11 /2019 examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. 1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. a. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One Million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other 03/11 /2019 form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One Million ($1,000,000) accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. b. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). C. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state in substantial conformance to the following: If the policy will be canceled before the expiration date the insurer will notify in writing to the City of such cancellation not less than thirty (30) days' prior to the cancellation effective date. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. d. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. 03/11 /2019 e. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the General Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City 03/11 /2019 retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: RJM Design Group, Inc. Attn: Robert Mueting 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 14. ASSIGNMENT The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 03/11 /2019 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The General Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 03/11 /2019 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT By: James Stewart, TCSD President ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, General Counsel RJM DESIGN GROUP, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: aAdi0-0AVM-A Anita Weaver, CFO CONSULTANT RJM Design Group, Inc. Robert Muetina, Principal 31591 Camino Capistrano San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 949-493-2600 /949-493-2690 bob@rjmdesigngroup.com PM Initi Date: s 03/11 /2019 EXHIBIT A Tasks to be Performed The specific elements (scope of work) of this service include: PHASE A — BASELINE INVENTORY TASK 1 - SCOPE / MEETINGS: RJM will conduct an initial kick-off meeting with the City to confirm and clarify the scope of services and project parameters, project background and objectives, product deliverables, methodology, schedule, as well as roles and responsibilities. In addition to specific task outlined meetings with staff RJM will hold regular virtual meetings with the City on a monthly basis to review progress, present information, and discuss direction, throughout the project. TASK 2 - CONTEXT / EXISTING DOCUMENTS: The RJM Team will review related documents pertinent to the development of the Community Services Master Plan, generating a database of existing resources to be referred to in subsequent tasks. Documents anticipated to be provided by the City of Temecula include: • Temecula General Plan • Parks and Recreation Master Plan (1993) • Youth Master Plan (2008) • Community Playbook for Youth with Special Needs (2012) • Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan (2016) • Senior Services Master Plan (2017) • Cultural Arts Master Plan (1999) • Quality of Life Master Plan (2010) • Parks Assessment (2015-2016) • Policies, zoning ordinances and land division ordinances • Existing City budget, Capital Improvement Program, 2005 Park Financial Strategy Plan • The City will also provide the use of existing City maps, aerials, GIS dataset and AutoCAD base maps for design and reproduction purposes • Other plans which may affect Master Plan decisions and recommendations (to be determined in coordination with City staff and the Master Plan team) TASK 3 - INVENTORY OF PARKS, PROGRAMS AND SERVICES: Our team will prepare a digital database of the City -owned recreation facilities, parks, trails, and open space, including joint -use school sites. The Park System inventory shall be organized by park categories which are consistent with the City's General Plan's Open Space Conservation Element. This database will be integrated into an ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) GIS dataset to allow mapping analysis in concert with the recorded community outreach data illustrating where recreation elements are in relation to the local community needs. Specifically the data set will include: • Geo-locate park facilities and photo document each site in the city's park system. This update of the recreation facilities available to residents will include an assessment of current conditions, quality, capacity, and functionality. 10/17/2018 • Quantify city -owned park passive and active recreational amenities; e.g. ballfields, basketball courts, dog parks, tennis courts, restrooms, and playgrounds. • Field verification of existing transportation facilities as required to support the issues and opportunities mapping that will be developed through the community engagement. This includes photo inventories of existing infrastructure, and review of circulation patterns documentation. In addition to the built inventory, our team will conduct a community -wide inventory of recreation programs and services offered by the City of Temecula and by other area providers within the last two years. This inventory may include program offerings and uses of recreation facilities and will identify other service providers that also meet the recreation needs of City residents and to identify those recreational areas that may be lacking or not being served in Temecula. Data collected on recreation programs, if available, can include: frequency, ages served, attendance, and other pertinent details. TASK 4 - DEMOGRAPHICS: Understanding the recreation needs and preferences of City residents first depends upon an understanding of the population and its demographic characteristics. Steps in this process involve a review of data regarding the City's population base as defined in the latest census, ESRI Tapestry Dataset, and the American Community Survey. Current year estimates of key variables may also be obtained from the California Department of Finance. As available, demographic data regarding age, household size, ethnic profile and income characteristics will be used in the analysis. TASK 5 - FUNDING: Our Team will prepare an inventory of existing funding sources available to the City for parks and recreation uses, including development impact fees, Measure S sales taxes, Measure C special taxes for the Temecula Community Services District, existing Community Facilities District special taxes which are used for capital improvements, recreation program fees, General Fund revenues and other sources. Based on projected growth for Temecula and existing funding capacity limits, RJM will provide a projection of potential growth for the major parks and recreation funding sources. In addition, we will prepare a preliminary evaluation of the new state bond programs that were approved to anticipate funding Temecula may receive. TASK 6 - COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: To ensure that the Community Services Master Plan is representative of the needs, priorities and concerns of all residents in the City, (not just those who actively participate in the workshops, community meetings, or advisory committees) we propose a robust outreach campaign including: • Telephone survey • Geo-referenced Online Survey • Ward Specific Workshops (5 total) • Sports Organization Specific ESRI Online Survey The community outreach campaign will be promoted through local publications and digital resources including social media marketing ads, user group promotions, community leader participation and local notices at City facilities. The first tool in our engagement strategy is to employ a statistically reliable survey of at least 500 households. A sample of this size will provide a highly reliable profile of residents' needs, priorities, and preferences as they pertain to 10 10/17/2018 the Plan, with a maximum statistical margin of error due to sampling of 4.5% at the 95% level of confidence. It will also allow the data to be analyzed within various subgroups (e.g., by age, area of residence, lifestyle parameters, etc.) to identify how needs, preferences, and activities vary at the subgroup level within acceptable margins of error. After selecting households at random using a stratified design, the survey will be administered using a mixed -mode approach including multiple recruiting methods (mail, email and telephone) and data collection methods (telephone and password protected online surveys) to ensure a balanced, representative sample. Using a mixed -mode approach will ensure a higher participation rate, reduce response bias, better capture the opinions of traditionally hard -to -reach subgroups, and ultimately deliver more reliable data than relying on a single -method approach (i.e., telephone only). The next level of community engagement will focus on community consensus building workshops. The community will be offered a series of opportunities local to their ward to participate and will be informed of the planning process. The community feedback from the workshops will provide important input to the prioritization of programs and services offered by the City as well as future parks, recreation facilities, trails, and open space development in the City. RJM shall plan and conduct five (5) community workshops (one in each ward of Temecula) to enable city wide community participation. This workshop process will clarify and augment the identified desires of the community developed through other public planning tools. This workshop methodology is designed to arrive at consensus regarding the priorities perceived by the public for improvements to the parks, programs, and services. Each workshop includes up to a three (3) hour session, inclusive, for up to fifty (50) participants We propose to work closely with City Staff to organize and further define the approach to be used in this process. We will coordinate with city staff for the promotion of the workshops, scheduling, and the provision of staff to assist with the workshops. The last outreach tool in our community engagement strategy is to employ a Sports Organization Specific ESRI Online Survey. The survey is specifically designed to collect valuable information regarding facility usage, team size, recreation seasonality, and player volume that is key to calculating the city's local demand for sports facilities. The RJM Team will provide a survey form containing questions relevant to the usage of City recreation facilities by sports organizations in the City through Survey123, an innovative online method utilizing GIS technology. The results will be tabulated and used to verify and update the participation rates in selected sports for use in the demand analysis and calculation of the City's local community park standard. This standard will represent the unique local demand not just a national averaged benchmark. TASK 7 - STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT: Direct one-on-one interviews will be conducted with selected key stakeholders such as the members of the City Council and Community Services Commission, City Manager's Office and representatives from each core division or function of the Department to determine department goals, policies, priorities, operations and maintenance, and staffing needs. RJM will work with staff to identify interviewees. Estimate twelve (12) interviews to be conducted. Additionally focus groups with selected stakeholders from the community such as sports organizations, arts and cultural representatives, school district personnel, youth groups, or seniors will ask questions in an interactive setting where participants are encouraged to discuss thoughts freely with each 11 10/17/2018 other. Working with City staff our team will identify and schedule six (6) focus group meetings of up to 15 individuals. TASK 8 - STAFFING: The RJM team shall research current staffing levels and organizational structure based upon the existing department and potential growth with the development of this plan. Research will be aimed at identifying any potential gaps and prepare sufficient needs to be explored later in the analysis. TASK 9 - MAINTENANCE: In tandem with the parks and facility inventory the existing maintenance levels will be reviewed and recorded against the NRPA Maintenance Management Standards. Deferred maintenance, future anticipated maintenance and repairs will be identified and recorded in the dataset. The identified park maintenance levels and site specific conditions will be further explored in the analysis phase of the Community Services Master Plan. TASK 10 - POLICIES AND FEES: Our Team will analyze current facility usage policies and fees for consistency, relevance, and effectiveness. The RJM Team will also review Temecula's planning and development ordinances pertinent to parks development issues; and analyze amendments and/or new ordinances as needed to accomplish parks development goals and objectives. PHASE B — ANALYSIS II�9:�iQI�DL�I��IiT:�'/_1►/_1A'696Y� The existing inventory will be analyzed by service area to identify underserved neighborhoods or community planning areas. Map exhibits will be developed to determine the distribution of recreation facility types throughout the City. The results will illustrate any gaps in balancing the equitable distribution of service and opportunities for all ages and income levels. An analysis of best possible providers of community programs and services as well as recreation facilities shall be provided and compared to the city's existing inventory. It will include an analysis of possible competition or duplication of services through other public and private service and facility providers (when available to general public), and possibilities for minimizing duplication and/ or enhancing collaborative partnerships where appropriate. TASK 2 — DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS: Detailed demographic data regarding such variables as age, presence of children, ethnicity, household size, and income as well as special populations which may require specialized or disproportionate services and programming, such as seniors, teens, pre-schoolers, second - language learners, individuals with disabilities, military families and veterans will be analyzed in order to identify special populations for use in the demand analysis. Special attention will be given to any sub -groups of the population that show unusual trends of change. Trends in these measures, that tend to be highly correlated with recreation patterns, will be examined. Today's decisions regarding recreation facilities and programs need to accommodate 12 10/17/2018 both population growth as well as change in demography. The historic data will be analyzed and projections of future population will be prepared using information and input from other agencies and City staff. This evaluation will provide estimates of the current population base and projections of future growth over the next 5, 10, & 20 years. This analysis will then be applied to local service standards for facilities based on the identified community demand. TASK 3 — FUNDING ANALYSIS: Based on capital and maintenance costs identified in other tasks, RJM will address capital and operating revenue requirements and potential funding sources. The capital funding analysis will address planned and projected projects identified in the Community Services Master Plan process and will match known and potential funding sources to the appropriate project costs. Our Team will estimate City impact fees based on projected development. We will also scan grant funding agencies to identify any upcoming grant opportunities that may be useful, as well as potential applicability of the new state bond measure. We will prepare a matrix of potential funding sources that can be applied to correcting existing deficiencies vs. those appropriate for facility expansion. We will also review operating costs and revenues. Building on an analysis of existing costs and revenues, RJM will project operating costs and potential revenue sources for each park and recreation facility included in the Community Services Master Plan. RJM will work with City staff to identify operating revenue strategies that can address both short and long-term maintenance and operations needs of the Department. The analysis will address the full range of revenues identified in the Baseline Funding Assessment above. RJM will propose a short term and long term comprehensive funding strategy to implement the Community Services Master Plan, including both capital finance and sustainable operating revenues and costs. The strategy will provide analysis for increasing existing revenue sources or adopting new revenues to implement the Master Plan. In addition, the analysis will include the following: • Fiscal Capacity of Parks • Develop budgets for the creation of new park development, maintenance of new and existing parks, and operating programs. • Identify resources needed to operate and maintain future parks and recreation programs based on past funding, operating, and maintenance trends. • Based on the park user profile and community needs assessment, identify funding resources that would be required to meet park and recreation needs. Project costs for the next 5, 10, & 20 years. • Evaluate best alternative funding sources for the City including options to address any funding gaps; and identify best funding practices in other cities that can be explored by the City of Temecula. TASK 4 — COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ANALYSIS Each of the community engagement strategies employed will be analyzed and combined into a single engagement heat matrix. This matrix will illustrate where the greatest community needs are that represent the majority of the residents as well as other trending recreation desires among the community. RJM's Custom Park Standard Calculations (CPSC) will evaluate and identify recreational needs specific to Temecula residents and non-residents based on Actual Participation and Use. In light of the current inventory of recreation facilities we will identify surpluses and deficiencies in 13 10/17/2018 existing parks and recreation -related facilities to serve the community as it exists now and with projections to 2040. The degree of need (the City's DNA based on RJM's defensible needs analysis) will be used as one criterion to help establish priorities in developing the Capital Improvements Plan. TASK 5 — STAFFING ANALYSIS: Our Team will provide evaluation and analysis of current operations practices giving specific attention to parks and facility maintenance and staffing (consideration will be given to contract maintenance vs. in-house staffing) pertinent to future growth of parklands, buildings and facilities, and related services. Determine necessary changes to staffing levels, allocations of staff to specific divisions or programs, and budget to accommodate future needs. TASK 6 — MAINTENANCE ANALYSIS: Our Team will analyze maintenance and operations standards needed to meet the current and future program and facilities needs of the City. This report will include prioritized information on the City's needs (based on inventory, demographic projections, and community needs assessments), National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) guidelines for Mode II maintenance level, sustainability practices, and best professional practices. Analysis will be prepared for policies, maintenance standards, and levels of service for each type of facility and program, including a summary of key findings related to maintenance, operations, and sustainability practices. This may include: • Develop goals, objectives, policies, and standards for the park system that will respond to the identified needs of the community. • Develop a priority schedule for the development of parks and open space, if appropriate, prioritizing areas of the city that are lacking such parks/spaces. • Determine usage patterns and maintenance needs of the park to meet future demands consistent with the program vision, policies, and priorities. • Identify ranking order of priority for existing deficiencies at each park/site, with greater importance placed on items relating to safety and/or accessibility. • Determine if park facilities' current layout serve their intended purposes or if they need to be updated or changed to meet current use. • Analyze industry standard maintenance practices and policies that should be in place for each identified facility, for proper maintenance and upkeep to preserve the expected useful life of each park. • Examine and incorporate community input and needs assessment, develop operational budgets, partnership options, and the financial requirements for the development of enhanced or new recreational programs. TASK 7 — POLICY/FEES ANALYSIS: RJM will develop an overall operational assessment for efficiencies and best management practices that can be employed to guide the organization including an analysis and identification of core recreation services, effective resource allocation, cost recovery, and pricing strategies that take into consideration community wide benefits vs. individual benefits. Broad strategies for improvement or elevation of current operations to a best practice level will be presented that will apply to: • Pricing strategies for facilities and programs • Staffing standards for services used by the community • Inventory of potential community partnerships and outside providers 14 10/17/2018 PHASE C — RECOMMENDATIONS TASK 1 — DRAFT COMMUNITY SERVICES MASTER PLAN REPORT RJM will analyze all information gained from the previous tasks and synthesize them into a comprehensive summary report. After the facility needs, community priorities, and public consensus are defined, we will discuss and evaluate with City Staff the short-term, intermediate, and long-term opportunities to create new community recreation facilities. This may include evaluation of areas such as drainage or flood control sites, vacant land, or reuse of existing park land as well as potential new or enhanced partnerships to maximize the communities existing resources. Land that can serve as potential park system acquisitions and/or parks development opportunity within the community. A comprehensive list of projects shall be provided including projects for all existing park sites as required for expansion and replacement of old infrastructure, replacement of existing infrastructure, and build -out of undeveloped parks, acquisition and development of future park sites and adding new amenities to existing parks. Each project shall include a description, cost estimates, and potential funding source. Promising opportunities yielded from the previous analysis may be further evaluated with conceptual park plans for underdeveloped or undeveloped parkland. For recreation facilities requiring new sites, our team will identify and rank site options. These sites will be evaluated and ranked based on the following types of criteria: • Size of parcel • Location • Access • Proximity to residents • Proximity to neighborhoods with gaps • Potential costs (based on industry standards for similar properties --not on appraisals) • Availability of utilities The final Master Plan Report will provide an Action Plan (short-term 5 years, intermediate 10 years, to long-term 20 years) to identify specific tasks required to implement intelligent growth of the park system and services. The Master Plan will summarize all information gathered in inventory tasks, analysis, funding opportunities, phasing, community priorities and other data as appropriate. Recommend levels of recreation program service and park facilities shall be presented graphically and demonstrate equitable distribution of service and opportunity. A list of site specific projects, acquisitions, and services shall be generated and prioritized. All financial strategies and recommendations will be developed as a collaborative effort of the project team and City Staff. The general type of sources to be considered will include: • General Fund (CIP) • GO Bonds • Lease Revenue Bonds • Park in -lieu fees • Park Impact Fees " • Community Facilities District • State Bond Funds • Major grant programs • Sponsorships 15 10/17/201 S * Does not include fee schedule. Feasibility study only, no legal documents, ordinances, nexus study, or public hearings are included in our work plan. All original detailed research and summary reports will be catalogued in an Appendix Document. PHASE D — FINAL REPORT TASK 1 — PRESENTATION TO THE CITY AND ADVISORY GROUPS RJM will prepare the draft Master Plan document and deliver it in PDF format to the Project Team for two rounds of review and comment prior to further daylighting. RJM will present the revised draft to selected stakeholders including Departmental and Executive staff, the Community Services Commission, Planning Commission, and Park and Recreation Subcommittee for review & comment. Additionally RJM will present the final draft Master Plan to City Council for review, comment, and final direction. TASK 2 — PREPARATION OF MASTER PLAN DOCUMENT: The council adopted Community Services Master Plan shall be provided in hard and digital copy for internal review. The document shall be produced in such a manner as to easily allow updates and up to two rounds of revisions to the document. All data, information, materials, and work produced including final text, maps, and graphics including all digital files shall become sole property of the City of Temecula. TASK 3 — REVIEW AND ADOPTION: RJM will attend Community Services Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council meetings as requested on an hourly basis in regards to the review and adoption of the Community Services Master Plan. Our proposal anticipates three (3) meetings based on the above defined scope. 16 10/17/2018 EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule Cost for services shall be as per Consultant's fee proposal (below). In no event shall the total cost of services exceed Two Hundred, Seventy Six Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($256,200.00) plus up to Twenty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($20,000.00) in City - approved reimbursable expenses for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in the Payment section of this Agreement. —a City of Temecula - Community Services Master Plan • it Fee Proposal RJ "° " FEE SCHEDULE It is the objective of our Design Team to provide the most comprehensive, yet efficient, approach to the development of the City of Temecula's Community Services Master Plan. This fee includes all costs to be incurred by RJM Design Group, Inc. with the exception of reimbursable expenses. QtKniption of Work Fee. PHASE A: BASELINE INVENTORY Task 1: ScopetMeetings $ 7,600.-00 Task 2: Context/Existing Documents $ 8500.00 Task 3: Inventory of Parks; Programs & Services $26,120.00 Task 4: Demographics $ 2,500.00 Task 5: Funding $ 7,500,00 Task 6: Community Engagement $53,290.00 Task T Stakeholder Engagement $ 8,250.00 Task 8: Staffing $ 2,000.00 Task 9: Maintenance $ 2,500.00 Task 10: Policies and Fees $ 3,000-00 PHASE A SUB TOTAL $121;260.00 PHASE B: ANALYSIS Task 1: Inventory Analysis $ 7,500,00 Task 2: Demographic Analysis $ 3,500.00 Task 3: Funding Analysis $13,400,00 Task 4: Community/Stakeholder Engagement Analysis $28,530.00 Task 5: Staffing Analysis $ 2,000.00 Task 6: Maintenance Analysis $ 2,500.00 Task 7: Policy/Fees Analysis $ S,500.00 PHASE B SUB TOTAL $ 62.930,00 PHASE C: RECOMMENDATIONS Task 1: Draft Report $40,760.00 PHASE D: FINAL REPORT Task 1- Presentations $13;750.00 Task 2: Master Plan Document $12,500.00 Task 3: Review and Adoption $ 5,000.00 PHASE D SUB -TOTAL $ 31,250.00 TOTAL FEE,: $256,200.00 'Note: The scope of work and associated fees are subject to refinement at Client's request. S" AAN CAMTRAM, www R md—gng—p — • [949];93-26ra 17 10/17/2018 CITY COUNCIL - PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO . 20 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve Fiscal Year 2019-20 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan Funding PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2019-20 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM AND FINDING THAT THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN IS EXEMPT FROM THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT AND THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT BACKGROUND: The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program was established through the Housing and Community Development Act in 1974. The primary purpose of CDBG funding is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. From 1992 to 2012, the City participated in the Riverside County Economic Development Agency Entitlement Program to receive CDBG funding. On April 10, 2012, City Council adopted the first Five -Year Consolidated Plan (ConPlan), authorizing the City to become an Entitlement Community and direct recipient of CDBG funds. As an Entitlement Community, the City of Temecula is required to develop a ConPlan every five years. For each succeeding year, the City is required to prepare an Annual Action Plan to notify citizens and HUD of the City's intended actions to meet CDBG goals during that year. The Action Plan serves as a guide on how the City intends to address national objectives and priority needs identified in the ConPlan. Staff held two CDBG community workshops at the Temecula Community Center November 30, 2018 (afternoon and evening). The workshops encouraged participation regarding CDBG funding and provided technical assistance to applicants. Based on input gathered from the public, and the adopted ConPlan, the following objectives continue to guide the City in allocating CDBG funds: • Promote the development of affordable housing. • Preserve the existing housing stock. • Ensure equal access to housing opportunities. • Provide public services for low and moderate income residents. • Provide public services for residents with special needs. • Provide public services for the homeless and those at -risk of homelessness. • Provide public services for seniors and veterans. • Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure. • Promote economic opportunity. • Amend land use and zoning laws to promote the development of affordable housing. • Provide greater access to public facilities for persons with disabilities. The Finance Committee, consisting of Council Members Edwards and Stewart, convened on February 26, 2019 to make recommendations on CDBG funding for the upcoming fiscal year. Their recommendations are reflected in this report. The draft 2019-20 Annual Action Plan was available for public review from March 23, 2019 through April 23, 2019. 2049-20 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The City of Temecula anticipates receiving approximately $546,925 through the CDBG program for the 2019-20 program year. A maximum of twenty percent may be allocated for administration of the program, and a maximum of fifteen percent may be allocated for public services, with the remainder, approximately $355,000, available for capital improvement projects. The breakdown of the estimated budget is demonstrated in the following chart. Estimated 2019-20 CDBG Budget 2019-20 Allocation $546,925.00 2019-20 Program Income $0.00 Available Unallocated/Reprogrammed Funds $0.00 Total Funds Available $546,925.00 Public Service Allocation Maximum 15% of 2019-20 Allocation $82,038.75 Total Public Service Funds Available $82,038.75 1 Capital Improvements Allocation 2019-20 Allocation $546,925.00 2019-20 Program Income $0.00 Minus Allocated Administrative Funds $109,385.00 Minus Allocated Public Service Funds $82,038.75 Plus Available Reprogrammed Funds $0.00 Total Capital Improvements Funds Available $355,501.25 Administrative Funds Maximum 20% of 2019-20 Allocation $109,385.00 Total Administrative Funds Available $109,385.00 Public Services The City received nine public service funding requests totaling $143,000. A maximum of $82,038 (15%) may be allocated for public services during the fiscal year. Staff completed an extensive review of the applications to determine the benefit to low and moderate - income persons, activity need, cost efficiency, effectiveness, activity management, and experience and past performance. A summary of the funding recommendations of the Finance Committee is below. All applicants for the 2019-20 funding period satisfy at least one Consolidated Plan priority, and are therefore eligible for funding. Organization Project Name Program Description Finance Committee - Recommendation - Community Mission of Hope Hospice of the Valleys Safe Alternatives for Everyone, Inc. (SAFE) Voices for Children Canine Support Teams, Inc. City of Temecula Housing and Food Resource Center Senior Assistance Program Creating SAFE Families Provide case management for homeless; food pantry Provide direct costs of hospice care for senior citizens and severely disabled Victim awareness; case management; support for victims Court Appointed Special Case management and advocacy Advocate (CASA) Program for foster children in Temecula Service Dogs for Disabled Provide service and assistance Persons dogs to people with disabilities. Homeless Prevention and Connecting homeless individuals Diversion Program with services and financial assistance Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest Before and After School Care Round trip school transportation; County for Kids activities before and after school Assistance League of Temecula Valley Fair Housing Council of Riverside County Operation School Bell Comprehensive Fair Housing Program Total Public Service Funds Requested for 2019-20 Clothing & supplies for low income students in TVUSD Fair housing education, training, technical assistance; landlord/ tenant mediation Housing Activities and Capital Improvement Projects $5,291 $5,291 $5,291 $5,291 $5,291 $25,000 $5,291 $5,291 $20,000 $82,038 The City received one application for housing funds. The Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program proposes to provide three to five low-income households with home repair and maintenance services to keep homes affordable. The Finance Committee recommended funding Habitat for Humanity $35,000 from capital improvement funds. The Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program meets the ConPlan goal of "preserv[ing] the existing housing stock." The Finance Committee recommended that the remainder of the CIP funds ($320,501) be allocated towards high priority accessibility projects in City parks and facilities, as identified in the draft Americans with Disabilities (ADA) Transition Plan. Financial allocations towards these projects satisfy the ConPlan goal of "provid[ing] greater access to public facilities and improvements for persons with disabilities." FISCAL IMPACT: Upon the approval of the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan, the City of Temecula anticipates receiving approximately $546,925 through the CDBG program for 2019-20, and approximately $2.75 million through the duration of the Consolidated Plan cycle. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution — Approval of 2019-20 Annual Action Plan Exhibit A: 2019-20 Annual Action Plan 2. Notice of Public Hearing (English and Spanish) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2019-20 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM AND FINDING THAT THE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN IS EXEMPT FROM THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT AND THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City of Temecula has participated directly within the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an entitlement jurisdiction for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds since July 1, 2012; B. The City of Temecula has prepared all documents, notices, and forms required by HUD for participation in the CDBG Program by entitlement jurisdictions; C. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-42 on June 14, 2011 initiating the City to obtain entitlement community status from HUD, and authorized the Director of Community Development to prepare and return for City Council approval all documents required for the designation as an Entitlement City, including the Five -Year Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plan, and the Citizen Participation Plan; D. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-43 on June 28, 2016, approving the updated Citizen Participation Plan that sets forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen participation in the development of its Five -Year Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, Annual Performance Reports, and any substantial amendments deemed necessary for direct administration of federal CDBG funds; E. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-57 on September 23, 2016, approving the 2017-21 Assessment of Fair Housing; F. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-24 on April 25, 2017, approving the 2017-21 Five -Year Consolidated Plan and 2017-18 Annual Action Plan; G. The City of Temecula has prepared an Annual Action Plan to implement the second year of the Five -Year Consolidated Plan; H. The Annual Action Plan includes HUD entitlement funding and the proposed use of Federal CDBG funds for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2019-20; I. The 2019-20 Annual Action Plan was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by Federal, State, and local law; J. The Annual Action Plan is required by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and must be approved by that agency for the City to receive federal CDBG funds each year. K. At the conclusion of the Finance Subcommittee meeting and after due consideration of the testimony, the Finance Subcommittee provided funding recommendations for the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan on February 26, 2019; L. The 2019-20 Annual Action Plan was available for public review between March 23 and April 23, 2019; M. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan on April 23, 2019, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. N. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council approved the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. O. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. Pursuant to Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, of the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Part 91 Consolidated Submissions For Community Planning And Development Programs (24 CFR Part 91) each entitlement jurisdiction must adopt a Five-year Consolidated Plan that states its overall plan to develop a viable urban community by providing for decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate -income persons, and prepare an Annual Action Plan each year describing the activities the jurisdiction will undertake during the next year to address those five-year priority needs and objectives; B. The City Council must adopt a plan that serves the following functions: 1. A planning document for the jurisdiction, which builds on a participatory process among citizens, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders; 2. A submission for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs for jurisdictions; 3. A strategy to be followed in carrying out HUD programs; and 4. A management tool for assessing performance and tracking results. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The proposed action on the Annual Action Plan (2019-20) is exempt from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) pursuant to the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and specifically 24 CFR 58.34(a)(1) because the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan is a resource identification study and the development of plans and strategies for the prioritization and funding of proposed programs through CDBG and the proposed action involves the feasibility and planning studies to determine prioritization and CDBG funding to begin the development of certain projects. The potential projects discussed in the proposed actions that might involve physical activity will be reviewed under NEPA or the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the development of those projects. The proposed action is also exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 and 15378(b)(4). Section 4. Approvals. A. The City Council hereby approves the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan, set forth as Exhibit A attached hereto, and any and all other documents deemed necessary by HUD to obtain the annual CDBG allocation of the federal CDBG funds and authorizes and directs the City Manager, or his designee, to serve as the Certifying Officer for all environmental review procedures associated with the various CDBG projects, and Certifying Officer for the purpose of signing correspondence, agreements, and other required documents. B. The City Council hereby approves an application for CDBG Entitlement funds in the amount of $546,925; the allocation of the CDBG current year program administration of $109,385; the allocation of the CDBG current year program activities of $437,540; Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of April, 2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 19- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk City of Temecula 2019-20 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 May 2019 a� 7ha Heart o#Southern Cali 'one Country Action Plon 2019-2020 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/18) City of Temecula Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................1 AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)........................................................................1 TheProcess................................................................................................................................................... 7 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b)............................................................................. 7 AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I)...................................................................................8 AP-12 Citizen Participation.....................................................................................................................28 AP-15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c)(1,2)........................................................................................... 32 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives........................................................................................................36 AP-35 Projects — 91.220(d).....................................................................................................................41 AP-38 Project Summary..........................................................................................................................43 AP-50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f).............................................................................................49 AP-55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g)...................................................................................................51 AP-60 Public Housing — 91.220(h)...........................................................................................................53 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i)............................................................54 AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.220(j)...................................................................................58 AP-85 Other Actions — 91.220(k)............................................................................................................ 60 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(I)(1,2,4)......................................................................63 Alternate/Local Data Sources........................................................................................................... Appendix A Citizen Participation and Consultation.....................................................................................Appendix B Grantee Unique Appendices.....................................................................................................Appendix C Grantee SF-424s and Action Plan Certifications...................................................................... Appendix D Action Plan 2019-2020 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/18) 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction On April 25, 2017, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted its Five -Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan describes the City's housing and community development needs, as well as strategies and activities to address those needs over a five-year period using entitlement grant funds provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The 2019-2020 Action Plan, which covers July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, represents the third year in that five-year plan. The City's grant program is consistent with HUD's national strategy to provide decent housing opportunities, a suitable living environment and economic opportunities particularly for low- and moderate -income persons. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 created the CDBG Program. The primary objective of the CDBG Program is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate -income. CDBG regulations require that each activity meet one of the following national objectives: • Benefit low- and moderate -income persons; • Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or • Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency. Each year, the City certifies with the submission of its Annual Action Plan that it has given maximum feasible priority to activities, which meet the first objective above. Additionally, the City certifies that no less than 70 percent of the CDBG funds received, over a three-year certification period, will be designed to benefit low- and moderate -income persons. 2019-2020 Program Year Funding The City expects to receive $546,925 in Community Development Block Grant funds in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. The proposed breakdown of those funds can be found in the following sections. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 1 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan 2019-2020 CDBG Program Public Service Activities Comprehensive Fair Housing Program $ 20,000 Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program 25,000 Before and After School Care for Kids 5,291 Operation School Bell 5,291 Senior Assistance Program 5,291 Temecula Safe and Healthy Families 5,291 Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program 5,291 Service Dogs for the Disabled 5,291 Housing and Food Resource Center 5,291 Capital Improvement Activities Public Facilities ADA Improvements Phase 1 $320,503 Critical Home Maintenance and Repair Program 35,000 Program Administration City of Temecula: Administration $109,385 Total $546,925 If HUD does not announce the FY 2019-2020 allocation of CDBG funds prior to the public hearing in April, and subsequently the allocation is different from what is estimated, no additional public review would be required to adjust the above budget. If the final allocation is greater than the estimate, each of the public services programs receiving $5,291 shall be increased proportionately, as each of those programs were funded less than their requests. If the final allocation is less than the above estimate, then all programs will be decreased proportionately. Staff will work with each of the sub -recipients to make any necessary adjustments to the proposed accomplishments. Staff will also determine the impact of budget changes on Capital Improvement Activities and make any necessary adjustments to a project's scope. No substantial amendments will be required for these adjustments. If additional funds become available during the program year from unanticipated increases in appropriations, savings from completed projects or dropped projects, City staff will increase the funding of the Capital Improvement Activities included in the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan. No substantial amendments will be required for such an action. 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 2 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan HUD's Community Planning and Development (CPD) Outcome Performance Measurement Framework classifies objectives in three categories: decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunity. Based on the Needs Assessment and Market Analysis, the Strategic Plan within the Consolidated Plan identifies eleven high priority needs to be addressed through the implementation of activities aligned with nine Strategic Plan goals. The last two priority needs were included to achieve goals identified in the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The high priority needs for Temecula are: • Promote the development of affordable housing • Preserve the existing housing stock • Ensure equal access to housing opportunities • Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents • Provide public services for residents with special needs • Provide public services for the homeless and those at -risk of homelessness • Provide public services for seniors and veterans • Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure • Promote economic opportunity • AFH: Amend land use and zoning laws • AFH: Address inaccessibility needs The following nine goals are identified in the Strategic Plan: • Affordable housing development • Housing preservation • Fair housing services • Services for low- and moderate -income residents • Services for residents with special needs • Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Services to seniors and veterans • Public facilities and infrastructure improvements • Small business creation and expansion Action Plan 2019-2020 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Pg. 3 City of Temecula 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary 5-year Goal 2019-2020 Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Outcome Outcome Indicator indicator 1. Affordable Housing Affordable Expand the supply 100 rental units 0 rental units Development Housing of affordable housing 2 Housing Affordable Preserve the 15 owner- 5 owner - Preservation Housing existing housing occupied units occupied units stock 3. Fair Housing Affordable Ensure equal 1,750 people 440 people Services Housing access to housing opportunities 4. Services for low- Public Provide public 1,600 people 579 people and moderate- Services services for low- income residents income residents 5. Services for Public Public services for 1,450 people 30 people residents with Services residents with special needs special needs 6. Services for the Homeless Prevent and 15,000 people 62 people homeless and eliminate those at risk of homelessness homelessness 7. Services to seniors Public Public services to 200 people 26 seniors and veterans Services seniors and veterans 8. Public Facilities and Non -Housing Neighborhood and 30,000 people 6,685 persons Infrastructure Community Infrastructure with disabilities Improvements Development Improvement 9. Small business Non -Housing Promote economic 24 businesses 5 businesses creation and Community opportunity expansion Development 3. Evaluation of past performance The investment of HUD resources during the 2017-2019 program years was a catalyst for positive change in the community. Totals shown below do not reflect accomplishment after February 2019, as the program year is not complete. Due to the late release of funds from HUD, many of the subrecipients have not yet reported their accomplishments; however, their accomplishments will be recorded in the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). Together Action Plan 2019-2020 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Pg. 4 City of Temecula 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City and its partners to: • Provide Fair Housing services to 565 clients; • Include a new translation tool on City's website that can translate each page into 103 languages, including information regarding the CDBG Program and fair housing; • Complete sidewalk segments on Fourth Street and Old Town Front Street in Old Town serving a low- and moderate -income area; • Complete an additional sidewalk segment on Ynez Road providing better transit connections to social services; • Complete the construction of a third sidewalk project along Mercedes Street and bidding the replacement of the boardwalks in Old Town; • Provide 109 underserved LMI youth with new clothing and school supplies through the Assistance League; • Assist eleven startup businesses through the Temecula Valley Entrepreneur's Exchange (TVE2) incubator program and conduct 281 one-on-one consultations, resulting in twelve jobs created; • Complete eleven housing rehabilitation projects through the Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repair Improvement Program for a total of 24 housing units over the life of the program; • Acquire six computers and set up six work stations for the recently -created City Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program and serve eleven homeless persons in the final two weeks of the Program Year 2017-2018 and another 23 homeless and at - risk of homelessness persons including 14 children in 2018-2019; • Provide 127 homeless and underserved LMI individuals with emergency food through the Circle of Care food bank; • Provide health care services to 59 women through Michelle's Place; • Provide hospice care through Hospice of the Valleys for 55 elderly persons; • Provide recreational programs to 59 foster care children through the Kids of Summer Program; • Provide a protection program for nine at -risk young people and assistance to 25 victims of domestic violence through SAFE; • Provide direct advocacy for eleven foster children through the Voices for Children program; • Provide before and after school care through the Boys and Girls Club for eleven low- income children; Action Plan 2019-2020 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Pg. 5 City of Temecula 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan • Complete the preparation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan and budgeted its first project based on its recommendations; • Entitle deed -restricted, age -restricted units in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment on December 20, 2017; • Conduct three homeless outreach days that provided case management, dental, medical, and job search services to individuals experiencing homelessness; • Adopt an accessory dwelling unit ordinance, creating additional opportunities for functionally affordable housing; • Complete the third phase of construction for Madera Vista, creating an additional 30 affordable housing units; • Complete the rehabilitation of the 55-unit Rancho California Apartments; • Approve a series of "Quality of Life" ordinances in October 2017, aimed at expanding the City's homeless outreach efforts; • In response to the City's Affordable Housing RFP for $12.4 million of Tax Allocation Bond (TAB) proceeds, select the first developer to enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement for the provisions of affordable housing. Sixty affordable housing units will be constructed as a result of that City contribution. The City continues to negotiate with other developers to utilize the remaining funds; • Work with Affirmed Housing to re-syndicate/rehabilitate Mission Village apartments. If successful, project completion is estimated to be completed by end of 2020; • Develop a community resource guide for those experiencing homelessness and at risk of homelessness; • Take a leadership role in a five -city regional homelessness alliance; • Promote economic development activity through programs such as: College and Vocational Fair, Future Physician Leaders, Global Citizens, Junior Women's STEM, Medical Scribe, Summer Foods Service Program, Leadership Academy, Summer Legal Scholars, Young Women's Career Conference, Youth Entrepreneurs and Youth Innovators; and • Host an Outreach/In-Reach Event at the HELP center, which allowed a one -stop shop for homeless, at -risk for homeless and at -risk populations in general. It included an incentivized meal, haircuts, medical and dental services, DPSS, Housing Authority, phone distributer, rehab providers, workforce development and mental health providers. While the City and its partners were able to successfully implement the activities listed above since July 2017, there are insufficient resources to fully address the level of need identified in the last Consolidated Plan. In June 2011, the State of California passed AB1X2 to eliminate Redevelopment Agencies —a substantial funding source for housing, community and economic Action Plan 2019-2020 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Pg. 6 City of Temecula 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan development programs in California —significantly curtailed the City's ability to implement activities that benefit low- and moderate -income residents. 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The City adopted a new Citizen Participation Plan on June 28, 2016 that reflects regulatory changes and process improvements. The new Citizen Participation Plan addressed HUD regulations pertaining to the Assessment of Fair Housing requirements for a more robust citizen involvement process. During the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan preparation process, the City facilitated citizen participation through surveys, community meetings and public hearings. During the preparation of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan preparation process, the City made efforts to encourage the participation of minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities. The consultation process included representatives of the CoC, PHA, and other specified groups who completed surveys, provided local data and assisted the Cityto ensure practical coordination of strategies to maximize impact and to avoid duplication of effort. On September 25, 2018, the 2017-2018 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) was presented to the City Council after a fifteen -day public review period. A list of stakeholders is included in Section AP-10. The City published a notice in the local newspaper, which has a general circulation within the City, that the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan is available for public review and comment. A public hearing will be held on April 23, 2019. 5. Summary of public comments In the development of the Action Plan, the City solicited applications from City Departments for housing, community development projects, the local fair housing agency and the public services agencies. The draft Action Plan was available for public review and comment from March 23, 2019 to April 23, 2019. The City Council will hold a public hearing on April 23, 2019 to receive comments on the Action Plan. (Insert public comments received.) A summary of public comments can be found in Table 5 and Appendix B. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them (Insert public comments received and not accepted.) 7. Summary Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 7 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan The City continues to make tremendous progress in meeting the nine goals identified in the 2017- 2021 Consolidated Plan. The 2019-2020 Action Plan will address eight of the nine Strategic Plan Goals from the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan by allocating $546,925 of CDBG funds to projects and activities to be implemented from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020. The ninth goal is to expand the supply of affordable housing. The City is using Tax Allocation Bond proceeds to construct sixty units of affordable housing, known as the Vine Creek Apartments; however, those units are not expected to be occupied in Program Year 2019-2020, because of the lengthy time to secure necessary tax credits. The City is still continuing its negotiations with other developers to utilize the remaining Tax Allocation Bond proceeds. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 8 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) The Process PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) 1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following is the agency responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and responsible for the administration of CDBG program. Table 2 — Responsible Agencies Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator City of Temecula Community Development Department Narrative The Community Development Department is the lead department responsible for the administration of the CDBG program. The City contracted with MDG Associates, Inc. to prepare the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan and the 2019-2020 Action Plan. In the implementation of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan and each of the five Annual Action Plans, the Community Development Department shall be responsible for all grant planning, management and monitoring duties necessary to comply with HUD regulations and City policy. Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Lynn Kelly -Lehner Principal Management Analyst City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951) 506-5172 lynn.lehner@TemeculaCA.gov Action Plan 2019-2020 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Pg. 7 City of Temecula AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I) 1. Introduction In preparing the Consolidated Plan and the Assessment of Fair Housing, the City of Temecula consulted with representatives from multiple agencies, groups, and organizations involved in the development of affordable housing, creation of job opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents, the provision of services to children, seniors, persons with special needs, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless persons. The primary agencies, groups, or organizations consulted are listed on the following pages. A comprehensive list of stakeholders is provided in Appendix B. The input received from these consultation partners helped establish the objectives and goals described in the Strategic Plan. Specific comments received from these organizations are included in Appendix B. To facilitate this consultation, the City solicited feedback through the following methods: • Stakeholder surveys (web -based and paper -surveys) • Individual stakeholder consultations • Community meetings • Public hearings • Receipt of written comments Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(1)). The City recognizes the importance of coordination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of the CDBG program. As a result, during the development of the Consolidated Plan, the City consulted closely with organizations that provide assisted housing, health services and other community -focused programs. Outreach efforts included surveys including specific questions associated with coordination, invitations to community meetings and follow-up in -person interviews where appropriate. The City further recognized the importance of continued coordination and alignment during the preparation of the 2019-2020 Action Plan with these organizations and agencies. The City continues strengthening relationships and alignment among these organizations in the implementation of the NOFA process for CDBG funds and through technical assistance provided to subrecipients of CDBG funds each year. The City monitors its affordable housing units every year to ensure compliance with State and Federal requirements, supports the County's Section 8 program and participates in the County's Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) program. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 8 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness The Continuum of Care of Riverside County (CoC) guides the development of homeless strategies and the implementation of programs to end homelessness throughout the region. The CoC is comprised of a network of public, private, faith -based, for -profit and nonprofit service providers who utilize several federal, state and local resources in providing services for homeless persons. The County and its cities, including the City of Temecula, also provide resources for services that assist the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless. The nonprofit and faith -based community plays a key role in the current CoC system. Hundreds of agencies throughout the County provide programs ranging from feeding the homeless on the street to creating permanent supportive housing opportunities. These services are available to homeless families with children as well as single men and women. The nonprofit and faith -based community also serves special needs populations, such as victims of domestic violence, veterans, persons with disabilities and unaccompanied youth. During the Five -Year Consolidated Planning process, the City provided a detailed questionnaire to the CoC to identify the CoC's perceived needs in the County and its objectives to address the needs of different homeless populations, specifically chronically homeless families and individuals, families with children, veterans, unaccompanied youth and persons at risk of homelessness. Following the delivery and response to this questionnaire, the City followed up with the CoC to clarify existing needs and objectives and understand opportunities for collaboration and coordination during the five-year planning process. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS In the development of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan, the City of Temecula consulted 130 housing, social services and other entities involved in housing, community and economic development in Temecula and throughout the region. Through this process, the City obtained valuable information on priority needs and how resources should be invested to provide decent affordable housing, a suitable living environment and economic opportunities primarily for its low- and moderate -income residents. The CoC was consulted directly by telephone and emails to discuss performance standards, outcome, policies, and procedures for HMIS. The City was referred to the Ten -Year Plan to End Homelessness, the 2017 Point -in -Time Homeless Count and other publicly available reports. Table 3 includes a representative listing of the entities consulted as part of the consultation process. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 9 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities Table 3 —Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. Agency/Group/Organization Type Service -Fair Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Public Services Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying fair housing needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 2 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority of the County of Riverside Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing PHA What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Public Housing Needs AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying rental housing needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 3 Agency/Group/Organization Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Housing Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 10 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in modifying their program within the City and understanding the housing rehab needs of City residents. 4 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Regional Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with Disabilities Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Non -Homeless Special Needs AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs of the special improved coordination? needs population and developing the programs and strategies. 5 Agency/Group/Organization State Council on Developmental Disabilities Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with Disabilities Other Government -State What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Non -Homeless Special Needs AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs of the special improved coordination? needs population and developing the programs and strategies 6 Agency/Group/Organization Southwest Riverside Association of Realtors Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Leaders Business and Civic Leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? Market Analysis AFH AP 2019-2020 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 11 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying economic development improved coordination? needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 7 Agency/Group/Organization Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically Consultation? homeless Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying needs of the homeless and developing strategies to address those needs. 8 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Continuum of Care Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically Consultation? homeless Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying needs of the homeless and developing strategies to address those needs. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 12 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 9 Agency/Group/Organization Wells Fargo Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying business needs within the improved coordination? City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 10 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Sheriff's Department Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -County What section of the Plan was addressed by Other: Crime Prevention Consultation? AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Interview. Information was used in consulted and what are the anticipated identifying existing crime prevention outcomes of the consultation or areas for programs and needs within the City improved coordination? and how the City is addressing the needs of the homeless and victims of domestic violence. 11 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Economic Development Agency Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -County What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Intergovernmental Consultation? cooperation AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Interview. Information was used in consulted and what are the anticipated identifying needs of the business outcomes of the consultation or areas for community within the City and improved coordination? developing the market analysis and strategies. 12 Agency/Group/Organization Desert AIDS project Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with HIV/AIDS What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -homeless Special Needs Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 13 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in consulted and what are the anticipated identifying needs of those with AIDS outcomes of the consultation or areas for and developing strategies to address improved coordination? those needs. 13 Agency/Group/Organization GRID Alternatives Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information used to develop consulted and what are the anticipated local housing rehab priorities. outcomes of the consultation or areas for Notification of 2019-2020 Action Plan improved coordination? preparation. 14 Agency/Group/Organization Coachella Valley Housing Coalition Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Interview and survey. Information consulted and what are the anticipated was used in identifying housing outcomes of the consultation or areas for needs within the City and developing improved coordination? the market analysis and strategies. 15 Agency/Group/Organization VA Loma Linda Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Health Publicly Funded Institution/System of Care What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Veterans Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in consulted and what are the anticipated identifying needs of veterans within outcomes of the consultation or areas for the City and developing the market improved coordination? analysis and strategies. 16 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Empire Rescue Mission Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 14 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically Consultation? homeless Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in consulted and what are the anticipated identifying needs of the homeless outcomes of the consultation or areas for and developing strategies to address improved coordination? those needs. 17 Agency/Group/Organization Western Riverside Council of Governments Agency/Group/Organization Type Regional organization Planning organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Market Analysis Consultation? Other -regional planning AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey and coordination. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying outcomes of the consultation or areas for needs in the region and developing improved coordination? strategies to address those needs. Notification of 2019-2020 Action Plan preparation. 18 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Valley Unified School District Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used to consulted and what are the anticipated identify needs of especially persons outcomes of the consultation or areas for with disabilities and employment improved coordination? needs and to develop strategies to address those needs. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 15 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 19 Agency/Group/Organization California Apartment Association Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Housing Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used to outcomes of the consultation or areas for identify the needs of the renters and improved coordination? to understand what is happening in the local market to better develop strategies. 20 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho West Apartments Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Services -Housing AFH AP 2019-2020 What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information on rental consulted and what are the anticipated housing needs outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? 21 Agency/Group/Organization Hospice of the Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information on needs of consulted and what are the anticipated seniors and application guidance. outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? 22 Agency/Group/Organization Autism Society Inland Empire Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 16 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs persons with improved coordination? disabilities within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 23 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Office on Aging Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Elderly Persons What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in consulted and what are the anticipated identifying needs of the elderly outcomes of the consultation or areas for within the City and developing the improved coordination? market analysis and strategies. 24 Agency/Group/Organization League of Women Voters Agency/Group/Organization Type Civic leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -community leaders Consultation? AFH How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs within the City and improved coordination? developing the market analysis and strategies. 25 Agency/Group/Organization SMURF - Single Mothers United in Rewarding Fellowship Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Children What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Children services Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying child care needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 26 Agency/Group/Organization Community Mission of Hope Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 17 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically Consultation? homeless Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 27 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Community Pantry Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically Consultation? homeless Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied Youth AFH How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 28 Agency/Group/Organization VNW Circle of Care Agency/Group/Organization Type Services homeless Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 18 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically Consultation? homeless Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 29 Agency/Group/Organization Love of Christ Christian Fellowship Agency/Group/Organization Type Other -Religious Minorities What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs of the Asian improved coordination? populations within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 30 Agency/Group/Organization SAFE Domestic Violence Services Program Agency/Group/Organization Type Services —Victims of Domestic Violence Services -Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Families with Consultation? Children AFH AP 2019-2020 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 19 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying needs of those suffering domestic violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 31 Agency/Group/Organization Assistance League of Temecula Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless needs -Families with Consultation? Children AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 32 Agency/Group/Organization Path of Life Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically Consultation? homeless Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies 33 Agency/Group/Organization Michelle's Place Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Health Services Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 20 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying women's health needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 34 Agency/Group/Organization Boys and Girls Club of SW County Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Children What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Recreational Needs Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying recreational needs of children living in the target areas within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 35 Agency/Group/Organization Voices for Children Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Children Services -Victims Child Welfare Agency AFH AP 2019-2020 What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs - Consultation? Unaccompanied Youth - How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying needs of foster children within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 36 Agency/Group/Organization Canine Support Teams Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with Disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 21 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying needs of persons with disabilities within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 37 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Police Department/County Sheriff's Department Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Crime Prevention Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying crime prevention needs improved coordination? and the needs of the homeless and victims of domestic violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 38 Agency/Group/Organization City of Temecula Community Services Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Services -Children Consultation? Services -Elderly Persons Services Person with Disabilities AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying recreational and socialization needs of the disabled population within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 39 Agency/Group/Organization City of Temecula Public Works Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Public Works needs Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 22 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying infrastructure and public facility needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 40 Agency/Group/Organization City of Temecula Office of Economic Development Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Community Development Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying economic development and microenterprise needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 41 Agency/Group/Organization Project Touch Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically Consultation? homeless Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Notification of 2019-2020 outcomes of the consultation or areas for Action Plan preparation. Information improved coordination? was used in identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies, identify AFH fair housing issues. 42 Agency/Group/Organization U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -Federal Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 23 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Interview. Assistance was sought consulted and what are the anticipated regarding the fair housing outcomes of the consultation or areas for assessment and needs to be improved coordination? identified within it. 43 Agency/Group/Organization Iglesia Bautista del Valle de Temecula Agency/Group/Organization Type Religious - Minorities What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Economic Development Anti -poverty Minority populations AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying Hispanic needs within the improved coordination? City and developing the market analysis and strategies, identify AFH fair housing issues. 44 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho en Espanol Agency/Group/Organization Type Religious - Minorities What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Economic Development Anti -poverty Minority populations AFH AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and consulted and what are the anticipated interview. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying Hispanic needs within the improved coordination? City and developing the market analysis and strategies, identify AFH fair housing issues. 45 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services —Victims of Domestic Violence Services -Victims Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 24 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Families with Children Consultation? AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Notification of 2019-2020 Action Plan consulted and what are the anticipated preparation. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs of those suffering domestic improved coordination? violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 46 Agency/Group/Organization Rose Again Foundation Agency/Group/Organization Type Services —Victims of Domestic Violence Services -Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Families with Children Consultation? AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Notification of 2019-2020 Action Plan consulted and what are the anticipated preparation. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs of those suffering domestic improved coordination? violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 47 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho Damacitas Agency/Group/Organization Type Services —Victims of Domestic Violence Services -Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Families with Children Consultation? AP 2019-2020 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Notification of 2019-2020 Action Plan consulted and what are the anticipated preparation. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs of those suffering domestic improved coordination? violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 25 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City maintains a list of agencies, organizations and other stakeholders that have expressed an interest in City's CDBG program and invited representatives from each entity to participate at multiple points in the planning process. All agencies were strongly encouraged to attend meetings and participate in surveys. Any agency or organization that was not consulted and would like to be included in the City's list of stakeholders is encouraged to contact Lynn Kelly -Lehner in the Community Development Department at (951) 506-5172. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Table 4 — Other local/regional/federal planning efforts Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care Continuum of Care of Riverside Strategic Plan goals are County consistent with Ten Year Strategy to End Homelessness 2014 Housing Element Update City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are consistent with Housing Element policies and goals 2017-2021 Assessment of Fair City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are Housing consistent with Assessment of Fair Housing 2005 General Plan Update City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are consistent with the General Plan policies and goals 2030 Quality of Life City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are Management Plan (QLMP) consistent with the QLMP policies and goals Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(1)) In the development of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan and the 2019-2020 Action Plan, the City afforded the following public entities with the opportunity to provide input on the Consolidated Plan. The City welcomes their input concerning the future implementation of project to address the Strategic Plan goals identified in section SP-45 of the Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 26 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) • Housing Authority of the County of Riverside • Regional Homeless Alliance • Riverside County Continuum of Care • Riverside County Department of Social Services • Riverside County Office on Aging • Riverside County Economic Development Agency • Riverside County Health Department • Riverside County Veterans Services • Riverside County Behavioral Health Department • Riverside County Sheriff's Department • Riverside Transit Agency • Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) • Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) • State of California Department of Housing and Community Development • State of California Department of Employment Development Department • State of California Council on Developmental Disabilities • Southwest Workforce Development Center • Inland Regional Center • U.S. Veterans Administration • Temecula Valley Unified School District • Mt. St. Jacinto College • City of Murrieta Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 27 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-12 Citizen Participation 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal -setting On June 28, 2016, the City adopted a revised Citizen Participation Plan to significantly expand community outreach efforts in the development of the Consolidated Plan. Through this process and the preparation of the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), the City doubled the number of stakeholder organizations from its previous consolidated planning process to promote broader citizen participation. The City provided outreach via electronic media in accordance with its Citizen Participation Plan and made public notices, surveys and other planning documents accessible to residents with limited English proficiency. To solicit and encourage participation in the identification of community needs and Strategic Plan goals, two surveys were conducted in the preparation of the AFH and Consolidated Plan. One survey was for residents of Temecula and the other was for stakeholder organizations serving Temecula residents as well as those stakeholders addressing regional needs. The resident survey was available on the City webpage and advertised in the San Diego Union Tribune, a media of general circulation in Temecula. The survey was distributed in City Hall at the front counter and permit center. Paper copies of the survey were provided for distribution to Temecula Pantry, Regional Homeless Alliance, and community churches whose congregations are comprised of mostly minority populations. Community workshops were convened to discuss housing, community and economic development needs and priorities for Temecula. These workshops were interactive, with discussion of a variety of needs. A concerted effort was made to reach out to nonprofit organizations through the community workshops and consultations with area nonprofits and other organizations serving Temecula residents. On February 26, 2019, the City of Temecula Finance Subcommittee conducted a public meeting to consider the CDBG funding recommendations for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. The Finance Subcommittee performs in an advisory capacity to City staff and to the City Council concerning planning, implementing, and assessing CDBG programs and activities. Twenty persons attended; ten persons in addition to City staff spoke about their proposed projects. After receiving all testimony, the Finance Committee made their funding recommendation. On March 23, 2019, the City published a notice in the San Diego Union Tribune providing the public a 30-day notice to review and comment on the draft 2019-2020 Action Plan. On April 23, 2019, the City Council will consider public testimony regarding both plans and authorized staff to submit them to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for program funding. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 28 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 5 — Citizen Participation Outreach Sort Mode of Target of Summary of response / attendance Summary of Summary of URL Order Outreach Outreach comments received comments not (If applicable) accepted and reasons 1 City Fair Housing Minorities The AFH Fair Housing and 2017- 100 Temecula All comments were Not and 2017-2021 Persons with 2021 Consolidated Plan Needs residents and accepted and applicable. Consolidated Disabilities Assessment Survey for residents stakeholders incorporated into the Plan Needs was disseminated on paper and in responded to the survey results and Assessment Non -English electronic form in English and in survey. The survey included in the Residents' and Speaking - Specify Spanish to advise the City on the its was available from Assessment of Fair Stakeholder other language: fair housing and highest priority June through August Housing. Surveys Spanish housing, community and economic 2016. development needs in Temecula. Non -targeted/ broad community 2 Newspaper Ad Minorities Newspaper ads were published on The purpose was to All questions were Not November 19, 2018 in the San explain the revised answered; all applicable. Persons with Diego Union Tribune announcing application process comments received. disabilities two Community Workshops to and to answer receive input on the preparation of questions. Non -targeted/ the City's 2019-2020 Action Plan. broad community See response below. Residents of Public and Assisted Housing 3 Internet Non -targeted/ Notice posted on City website, City The purpose was to All questions were temeculaca.gov Outreach broad community Hall, and Library inviting residents explain the revised answered; all to the community workshops at application process comments received. City Hall on November 19, 2018. and to answer questions. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 29 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response / attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comments not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 4 Community Minorities 13 stakeholders attended two Residents and All comments were Not Workshops Community Workshops held in the stakeholders accepted. applicable. Non -English afternoon and evening on participated in a Speaking - Specify November 29, 2018 at the presentation other language: Temecula Community Center concerning the Spanish located at 28816 Pujol Street, Consolidated Plan Temecula, CA 92590. and Action Plan. A Persons with facilitated discussion disabilities of community needs followed the Residents of presentation. Public and Assisted Housing 5 Public Hearing Non -targeted/ A public hearing was held before Representatives All comments were Not broad community the City Finance Subcommittee on from ten service considered prior to applicable. February 26, 2019 at 4:30 p.m. to providers spoke the Subcommittee receive a presentation concerning about their making their the Consolidated Plan and proposed projects recommendation. community needs. Twenty persons and answered attended this meeting, 10 persons questions. representing nonprofits and ten City employees were available to answer questions about City projects. Action Plan 2019-2020 pg. 30 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Mode of Target of Summary of response / attendance Summary of Summary of URL Order Outreach Outreach comments received comments not (If applicable) accepted and reasons 6 Newspaper Ad Minorities Notice of the 30-day public review Insert any comments None http://temecu laca.gov/CDB Persons with and comment period for the draft received. G Disabilities 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan was published in the San Diego Union Non -English Tribune. The public notice invited Speaking - Specify interested residents to review the other language: draft document and to provide Spanish written comments at the City of Temecula Community Development Non -targeted/ Department, City of Temecula City broad community Clerk's Office, or online at the CDBG website. Residents were invited to a public hearing to provide oral comments before the Temecula City Council on April 23, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. 7 Public Hearing Non- Public hearing for the draft 2019- Insert any comments None Not targeted/broad 2020 Annual Action Plan will be received. applicable. community held before the Temecula City Council on April 23, 2019. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 31 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction The projects and activities included in the Consolidated Plan period and each individual Annual Action Plan are based on resources that are reasonably anticipated to be available to the City from federal, state, local and private sources for the applicable period. This Annual Action Plan takes into account the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. The actual resources available to support activities during the implementation of the remainder of the Consolidated Plan may vary significantly due to factors outside of the City's control. For example, HUD formula grant allocations are subject to change each year based on a number of factors, such as the amount of the national appropriation, changes in ACS population data applied to the CPD grant formulas, statutory changes to the CPD grant formulas, the addition or removal of entitlements receiving a particular CPD grant and the availability of reallocated funds. Additionally, state, local and private resources will vary significantly depending on economic conditions. For Program Year 2019-2020, the City estimates that it will receive $546,925 of CDBG funds from HUD. When these amounts are combined with prior year resources available for inclusion in the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan, the City anticipates the availability of approximately $2,575,000 of CDBG funds during the five-year period that began on July 1, 2017 and will end on June 30, 2022. If HUD does not announce the FY 2019-2020 allocation of CDBG funds prior to the to the thirty - day public review process for the draft Action Plan and the final public hearing in April, and subsequently the allocation is different from what is estimated in the draft Action Plan, no additional public review would be required to adjust above budget. If the final allocation is greater than the above estimate, then each of the public services programs receiving $5,291 will be increased proportionately, since those programs were funded less than their requests. If the final allocation is less than the above estimate, then all programs will be decreased proportionately. City staff will also make any necessary adjustments to the proposed accomplishments. City staff will also determine the impact of budget changes on Capital Improvement Activities and make any necessary adjustments to a project's scope. No substantial amendments will be required for these adjustments. If additional funds become available during the program year from unanticipated increases in appropriations, savings from completed projects or dropped projects, City staff will increase the funding of the Capital Improvement Activities included in the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan. No substantial amendments will be required for such an action. Table 6 - Expected Resources — Priority Table Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 32 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Program Source of Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 3 Expected Amount Narrative Description Annual Program Prior Year Total: Funds Allocation: Income: Resources: $ Available $ $ $ Reminder of ConPlan CDBG Public- Admin and Based on federal Planning level Economic funding in Development subsequent Housing $546,925 $0 $0 $546,925 $2,060,000 years Public Improvements Public Services Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied To address housing and community development needs in Temecula, the City will leverage its CDBG entitlement grant with a variety of funding resources in order to maximize the effectiveness of available funds. The City's former Redevelopment Agency was the primary non- federal source of leveraged funds. With the elimination of the City's Redevelopment Agency, the City's ability to leverage federal funds has been substantially reduced. The City and its development partners will continue to seek new opportunities to leverage federal funds, such as the Low -Income Tax Credit program and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 202 and 811 for the Elderly Program. In addition, the City will leverage federal, state and private funds in investing $12.4 million in Tax Allocation Bond proceeds in creating affordable housing opportunities for its low- and moderate - income residents. The City has selected its first developer to utilize these funds in the construction of sixty units of affordable housing. Federal Resources • Continuum of Care (CoC) Program • HUD Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) • Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) • Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) • Youthbuild • Federal Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program State Resources • State Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 33 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) • Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) • CalHome Program • Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) • Housing Related Parks Grant • CaIHFA Single and Multi -Family Program • Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding Local Resources • Riverside County CoC • Housing Authority of Riverside County (HARIVCO) • Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA) • Local Tax Allocation Bond proceeds Private Resources • Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program (AHP) • Community Reinvestment Act Programs • United Way Funding • Private Contributions If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan On February 1, 2012, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and preservation of affordable housing. This negatively affected affordable housing and residential investment. While there are mechanisms whereby certain affordable housing assets tied to the former Redevelopment Agencies may be utilized today, the available resources for affordable housing are scarce. The City has selected the first development that will receive a portion of the $12.4 million in Tax Allocation Bond proceeds to construct affordable housing in the City for low- and moderate - income persons. Any land or property necessary to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan would need to be acquired using HUD grant funds or other resources. Discussion The City issued a request for proposals (RFP) for the development of affordable housing with the City's Tax Allocation Bond proceeds ($12.4 million), which could include more than one site, some of which are located east of 1-15. The City received twenty proposals from thirteen interested developers. The City has selected the first development to utilize these funds and is continuing to negotiate with other developers utilizing the remaining funds. Implementation of the Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 34 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) approved proposals will likely take place during the final years of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan. Based on prior project experience, it is anticipated that these funds will leverage other public and private funding, including but not limited to: o Low -Income Housing Tax Credits o Project -based Section 8 certificates o Project financing at favorable interest rates from local lenders o Private market real estate investments o Market rate housing that subsidizes affordable units on the same site o City -owned properties Assuming continued level funding of the CDBG program, the City expects to spend CDBG funds on community development, public facilities, housing preservation, infrastructure and public services activities that promote a suitable living environment between July 2017 and June 2022. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 35 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives Sort Start End Geographic Goal Name Category Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator Order Year Year Area Promote the CDBG:Rental Housing Constructed Affordable Housing Affordable $0 1 2019 2020 Citywide development of in 2019: 0 rental units Development Housing Local Funds: affordable housing $12.4 million Affordable Preserve the existing CDBG: Homeowner Housing 2 Housing Preservation 2019 2020 Housing Citywide housing stock $35,000 Rehabilitated: 5 Household Housing Units Other: 440 Other Other: Fair housing Affordable Ensure equal access to CDBG: 3 Fair Housing Services 2019 2020 Housing Citywide housing opportunities $20,000 workshop for housing industry and 1 training for homeless providers Services for low- and Provide public services CDBG: Public service activities: 579 4 moderate -income 2019 2020 Public Services Citywide for low-income $15,873 Persons Assisted residents residents Provide public services Services for Residents with CDBG: Public service: 30 Persons S Special Needs 2019 2020 Public Services Citywide for residents with $15,873 Assisted special needs Provide public services Services for the homeless to the homeless and CDBG: Public service activities: 62 6 and at risk of 2019 2020 Homeless Citywide those at risk of $30,291 Persons Assisted homelessness homelessness Services to Seniors and Seniors and Provide public Services CDBG: Public service activities: 26 7 Veterans 2019 2020 Veterans Citywide to Seniors and Veterans $5,291 Persons Assisted Public Facilities and Non -Housing CDBG Improve Neighborhood, Public Facility or 8 Infrastructure 2019 2020 Community Target public facilities and CDBG: Infrastructure Activities: $320,503 Improvements Development Areas Infrastructure 6,685 Persons Assisted Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 36 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 9 Small business creation and expansion 2019 2020 Non -Housing Community Development Citywide Promote Economic Opportunity CDBG: $0 Other: 0 businesses Other: Adopted Affordable Housing Overlay; Density AFH: Amend land use and Affordable Promote the CDBG: Bonus Ordinance on 10 zoning 2019 2020 Housing Citywide development of $0 September 25, 2018; affordable housing Implementation of 2017 California Housing Package Other: Adopted and 11 AFH: Inaccessibility 2019 2020 Non -Homeless Citywide Address accessibility CDBG: Implementing Transition Special Needs issues $0 Plan Table 7 — Goals Summary Action Plan 2019-2020 pg. 37 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Goal Descriptions 1 Goal Name Affordable Housing Development Goal In partnership with housing developers, leverage tax allocation bond proceeds in Description support of the development of new housing units affordable to households earning less than 30, 60 or 80 percent of Area Median Income. CDBG funds would not be used to address this goal. Marketing plans will be required that will include affirmative outreach methods targeted to protected class individuals including Hispanic and Native American households as well as households that include persons with disabilities. This goal addresses AFH Goal #2 "to increase and preserve affordable units for renters and homeowners." The City has awarded funds for the construction of its first affordable housing development utilizing $12.4 million in Tax Allocation Bond proceeds and continues to negotiate with other developers for the remaining funds. They are expected to construct 100 additional units of affordable housing. Due to the complexity of assembling financing packages, construction and developing marketing plans will occur in a future year. The third phase of Madera Vista Apartment has been completed with the construction of 30 additional affordable housing units. Solar panels have been installed on the entire 103 units in the Madera Vista Apartments to improve the affordability of the units. 2 Goal Name Affordable Housing Preservation Goal Preservation of the quality of existing affordable housing stock occupied by low - Description and moderate -income households. This goal also addresses AFH Goal #2 "to increase and preserve affordable units for renters and homeowners." The City will provide CDBG funds to Habitat for Humanity to address critical housing maintenance and repair issues of at least five houses occupied by at lower income households. The rehabilitation of the Rancho California Apartments was completed in March 2018, extending the affordability of 55 affordable units. Solar panels were installed on all 103 units in the Madera Vista apartment complex in November 2018. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 38 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 3 Goal Name Fair Housing Services Goal This goal also addresses AFH Goal #4 to provide equal housing opportunities for Description protected classes. In 2019-2020, the City will be providing 24% of its public service funds from CDBG to a fair housing service provider to provide outreach, education and assistance enforcing fair housing laws — particularly those protecting the rights of disabled residents. Throughout the year, the City will provide fair housing information on its webpage and distribute fair housing material at City facilities. The City website has a Google Translate tool, which can translate information about fair housing and the CDBG program into 103 languages. 4 Goal Name Services for low- and moderate -income residents Goal Provide low and moderate -income persons with appropriate health, fitness, Description recreational, educational and other services including, but not limited to, child care, before and after school care and healthcare services to support the well- being of low- and moderate -income families. 5 Goal Name Services for Residents with Special Needs Goal Provide supportive services for residents with special needs, including, but not Description limited, to those services addressing the needs of residents with disabilities, domestic violence, substance abuse, foster care and HIV/AIDS. 6 Goal Name Homelessness Prevention Services Goal Support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate Description homelessness including, but not limited to, supportive services for the homeless and those at -risk of homelessness, including homelessness prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 39 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 7 Goal Name Services to Seniors and Veterans Goal Provide seniors and veterans with appropriate supportive services, including, but Description not limited to, those related to health, fitness, recreational and educational services. 8 Goal Name Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Goal Improve City of Temecula public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and Description moderate -income residents or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low - and moderate -income such as the elderly and disabled adults. This goal also addresses AFH Goal #3 "to provide greater access to public facilities and improvements for persons with disabilities." During the 2017-18 program year, the City developed its ADA Transition Plan that has evaluated public facilities to ensure equal access for persons with disabilities. The assessment included city parks, trail systems, tennis/basketball courts, swimming pools, public facilities, fire stations, signalized intersections, bus stops and roadways with ADA ramps. Each year, the City will be addressing one or more of the needs identified in the ADA Transition Plan with CDBG funds. 9 Goal Name Small business creation and expansion Goal The City will not be addressing this goal with CDBG funds. Instead, the City will Description fund the TVE3 incubator program with its other resources. 10 Goal Name AFH: Land use and zoning laws Goal This goal addresses AFH Goal #1, by amending the Zoning Code to promote the Description development of affordable housing. The City adopted an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) Program by amending Title 17 of the Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to accommodate Temecula's regional housing need for 2,007 affordable units for lower income households. The City established an AHO on at least 100 acres. After the establishment of the AHO, sites identified will require: 1) minimum densities of 20 units per acre; 2) SO% of need (1,003 units) will be on sites allowing exclusively residential uses; 3) multi -family uses at the densities established under the AHO will be allowed by right, without a conditional use permit. 11 Goal Name AFH: Address Inaccessibility Goal This goal addresses AFH Goal #3 "to provide greater access to public facilities and Description improvements for persons with disabilities." To accomplish this goal, the City has prepared the ADA Transition Plan, which evaluated public facilities to ensure equal access for persons with disabilities. Initiated in program year 2018-2019, the City will address at least one accessibility deficiency each year with CDBG funds, which was identified in the Transition Plan. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 40 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-35 Projects — 91.22O(d) Introduction To address the high priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan to the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan, the City of Temecula will invest CDBG funds in projects that preserve affordable housing; provide fair housing services; provide services to low- and moderate -income residents; provide services to seniors, veterans and residents with special needs; prevent homelessness; improve public facilities and infrastructure; and facilitate the creation or expansion of small businesses. Together, these projects will address the housing, community and economic development needs of Temecula residents, particularly those residents residing in the low- and moderate -income CDBG Target Areas. Two AFH activities, the adoption of the Affordable Housing Overlay and the ADA Transition Plan, were not included among the following projects, because the City used other funding sources to accomplish these goals. They are discussed in more detail in the Sections AP-20, SP-25 and the AFH. The final AFH activity is the utilization of the Tax Allocation Bond Proceeds. The City has selected the first development utilizing these funds, which will result in construction of sixty affordable units. The City will continue negotiations with other developers in utilizing these funds. # Project Name 1 Affordable Housing Development 2 Housing Preservation 3 Fair Housing Services 4 Services for Low- and Moderate -Income Residents 5 Services for Residents with Special Needs 6 Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness 7 Services to Seniors and Veterans 8 Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements 9 Small Business Creation and Expansion 10 Program Administration Table 8 — Project Information Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 41 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG investments for program year 2019-2020 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people. Due to the nature of the projects and activities to be undertaken, investments in public facilities and infrastructure improvements activities are limited to the CDBG target areas, while other projects and activities benefiting low- and moderate -income limited clientele are available citywide. The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate -income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources, the high cost of housing, and the lack of availability of home improvement financing in the private lending industry. To address these obstacles, the City is investing CDBG funds through the 2019-2020 Action Plan in projects that provide grants to low- and moderate -income homeowners for home improvements; projects that provide public and neighborhood services to seniors, veterans, persons in foster care, the homeless and other low- and moderate -income people and those with special needs. The City has entitled the construction of 60 units of affordable housing with the $12.4 million Tax Allocation Bond proceed funds. The City is continuing negotiations with other developers in utilizing the remaining bond proceeds. Securing funding commitments such as tax credits continues to be a lengthy process and the completion of the construction will most likely occur in the later years of the five-year Consolidated Plan cycle. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 42 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-38 Project Summary Table 9 — Project Summary Information 1 Project Name Affordable Housing Preservation Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Housing Preservation Needs Addressed Preserve the supply of affordable housing Funding CDBG: $35,000 Description Preservation of the quality of existing affordable housing stock occupied by low- and moderate -income households through the implementation of the Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance & Repairs Program. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and Approximately 5 low- and moderate -income households will type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities. benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Habitat for Humanity - Critical Home Maintenance & Repairs Program (5 households) CDBG: $35,000 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 43 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 2 Project Name Fair Housing Services Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Fair Housing Services Needs Addressed Ensure equal access to housing opportunities Funding CDBG: $20,000 Description Affirmatively further fair housing choice through the provision of fair housing education, counseling, anti -discrimination and landlord - tenant mediation services. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Approximately 440 people will benefit from the proposed activity. Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (440 people) CDBG: $20,000 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 44 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 3 Project Name Services for Low- and Moderate -Income Residents Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Services for low- and moderate -income residents Needs Addressed Provide public services for low-income residents Funding CDBG: $15,873 Description Provide women with health services and youth with appropriate health, fitness, recreational, educational and other services to support the emotional and developmental well-being of children and youth from low- and moderate -income families. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and Approximately 579 people will benefit from the proposed activities. type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Assistance League of Temecula Valley (573 children) CDBG: $5,291 Boys and Girls Club (6 children) CDBG: $5,291 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 45 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 4 Project Name Services for Residents with Special Needs Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Services for Residents with Special Needs Needs Addressed Public services for residents with special needs Funding CDBG: $15,873 Description Provide special needs services including, but not limited, to those who are persons with disabilities and victims of domestic violence. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and Approximately 30 people will benefit from the proposed activities. type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities SAFE Alternatives for Everyone (24 persons) CDBG: $5,291 Voices for Children (CASA) (3 children) CDBG: $5,291; Canine Support Team (3 persons) CDBG: $5,291 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 46 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 5 Project Name Seniors and Veterans Services Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Services to Seniors and Veterans Needs Addressed Public services for seniors and veterans Funding CDBG: $5,291 Description Provide public services to seniors and veterans Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Approximately 26 people will benefit from the proposed activities. Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Hospice of the Valley (26 persons) CDBG: $5,291 6 Project Name Homelessness Prevention Services Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Services to the Homeless and Those at Risk of Homelessness Needs Addressed Provide public services to the homeless and those at risk of homelessness Funding CDBG: $30,291 Description Support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate homelessness including, but not limited to, homelessness prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Approximately 62 people will benefit from the proposed activities. Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program (60 persons) $25,000 Community Mission of Hope (2 persons) $5,291 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 47 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 7 Project Name Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Needs Addressed Improve Neighborhoods, Public Facilities and Infrastructure Funding CDBG: $320,503 Description Remove architectural barriers in City of Temecula public facilities to benefit those with disabilities presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 6,685 disabled residents in the City will benefit from the 2019-2020 CDBG removal of architectural barrier activities. Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Public Facilities ADA Improvements Phase II (6,685 persons): $320,503 8 Project Name Program Administration Target Area Citywide Goals Supported All Needs Addressed All Funding CDBG: $109,385 Description This project provides for the administration of the CDBG programs. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Not applicable. Location Description Not applicable. Planned Activities City of Temecula: CDBG Administration $109,385 Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 48 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The City of Temecula is located along Interstate 15 (1-15) in southwestern Riverside County, just north of the San Diego County line. Based on the 2018 State Department of Finance population estimates, the population of Temecula is 113,181. The City has undergone a 1.0 percent increase in population between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2018 and 12.3 percent increase since 2010. The population of Temecula is a multi -culturally diverse community. About 30 percent of the population is non- white. Hispanics of any race are the largest non -white ethnic group, comprising about 25 percent of the population, along with Asians (9.8%) and African Americans (4.1%). According to the State Department of Finance, the City had 36,456 housing units in 2018. Of these, 5.4% were vacant. In 2010, almost a quarter (24.6%) of the population in Temecula fell into the lower (extremely low, very low, and low) income category. This is not likely to have changed appreciably, although data is unavailable to substantiate that. In 2010, the unemployment rate was 10.8 percent. By 2018, the unemployment rate had dropped to 3.0 percent, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. In 2018, 82 percent of the households are single family attached and detached housing units. The average household size 3.28 persons per unit, up from 3.18 in 2018. The City of Temecula will use CDBG funds to address the needs of the 6,685 persons with disabilities in the City by removing architectural barriers in City -owned public facilities. This is the second phase in implementing recommendations identified in the City's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan. In accordance with the AFH goals, affordable housing provided by the Affordable Housing Tax Allocation Bond Proceeds will be developed outside of areas with relatively higher exposure to poverty. The same goal will be achieved by the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. Table 10 - Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds CDBG Target Area 0% Citywide 100% Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 49 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically The City's primary method of allocating CDBG dollars is to assist low- to moderate -income areas and special needs populations. To the extent that specific geographic areas have greater needs than other areas in the City and/or if service and housing organizations are located in certain areas, they have received a larger proportionate share of the funding. However, in this fiscal year, the City will focus its CDBG funds on removing architectural barriers in City -owned facilities. For affordable housing, the City's resources will be allocated in areas where affordable housing is lacking and/or infill areas can accommodate affordable housing, when feasible. During Program Year 3, the City is allocating resources to those activities/programs defined as high priority pursuant to those established within the Consolidated Plan. Activities listed as high priority include housing rehabilitation; facility and infrastructure improvements including accessibility upgrades, and a provision of services including child care, clothing, food, fair housing, shelter, health care, victims of domestic violence, assistance to persons with disabilities and other social services and economic development. As mentioned in the City's Strategic Plan, the greatest obstacle to meeting underserved needs is lack of funding. The City has many needs that exceed available funding, including infrastructure maintenance and repair, housing and services to special needs populations, comprehensive housing and services to assist persons who are chronically homeless move into supportive housing environments and provision of affordable housing. Both private foundations and public agencies have limited resources available to address social, community, and economic development goals pale in comparison to the recognized needs. For example, the City was able to fund only about 55 percent of the public service requests received from non-profit and government agencies this fiscal year. The City strongly encourages its subrecipients to seek other resources, to forge new partnerships, and to leverage additional funding whenever possible from local, State, Federal, and private sources. The City urges CDBG- funded programs and services to be flexible, while at the same time to be as efficient and effective as possible to achieve expected performance outcomes. Discussion Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG funds for program year 2019-2020 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate - income people. The City does not have any Neighborhood Strategy Areas. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 50 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-55 Affordable Housing — 91.22O(g) Two high priority affordable housing needs are identified in the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan and one Strategic Plan goal is established to provide the framework necessary to invest CDBG funds to address the affordable housing needs of the City. Expand the Supply of Affordable Housing Based on evaluation of 2009-2013 ACS and CHAS data, there is a high need for housing units affordable for households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. Of the 8,625 households earning 0-80 percent of AMI in the City, 7,025 are cost -burdened households —meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing. Additionally, 5,175 of the cost - burdened households are considered severely cost -burdened households —meaning that they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Of the 5,175 severely cost -burdened households, 2,895 are rental households and 2,280 are owner -occupied households. Of those severely cost -burdened renter households, 2,025 households earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless. To address the need for affordable housing, the City has approved the entitlement of sixty units of affordable housing utilizing Tax Allocation Bond proceed and will continue negotiating with other developers for the remaining bond proceed funds. Preserve the Supply of Affordable Housing As the City's housing stock ages, a growing percentage of housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain safe and habitable. The situation is of particular concern for low- and moderate -income homeowners who may not be in a financial position to maintain their homes. The age and condition of Temecula's housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. Housing over 15 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating / air- conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures. According to HUD's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data showing the year that housing units were built categorized by owner and renter tenure, the breakdown is as follows: Age of Housing Stock Built prior to 1980 Built between 1980-1999 Total Number Percent Number Percent 20,734 1,538 7.42% 11,954 57.65% 10,634 844 7.94% 6,078 57.16% Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 51 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low - and moderate -income households is a cost-effective way to invest limited resources to retain existing housing units that are already affordable to low- and moderate -income households in the community. Addressing substandard housing conditions through housing preservation activities by providing CDBG funds to Habitat for Humanity provide that all economic segments of the community have the means to ensure that their property meets local standards and that all Temecula residents have the opportunity to live in decent housing. One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless 0 Non -Homeless 5 Special -Needs 0 Total 5 Table 11- One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 0 The Production of New Units 0 Rehab of Existing Units 5 Acquisition of Existing Units 0 Total 5 Table 12 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion The Strategic Plan identifies a high priority need to expand the supply of affordable housing and a high priority need to preserve the supply of affordable housing. During the 2019-2020 program year, the City of Temecula will invest CDBG funds in the preservation of affordable housing units. Specifically, CDBG funds will be used to support affordable housing preservation projects including the Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance & Repairs Program. A number of developer proposals to construct affordable housing were under consideration utilizing $12.4 million in Tax Allocation Bond proceeds. The City has approved the construction of its first development utilizing these funds and continues to negotiate with other developers in constructing and/or rehabilitating additional affordable housing projects. Due to the length of time to receive tax credit funding commitments, no new housing units are expected to be completed in 2019-2020. The City is currently working with Affirmed Housing to re -syndicate and rehabilitate the 76-unit Mission Village apartments to preserve affordable housing in the City. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 52 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-60 Public Housing — 91.220(h) Introduction There are no public housing developments in Temecula. All public housing programs consist of housing choice and project -based vouchers administered by the Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACK). The data presented in the tables below is for HACR and the narrative responses address the needs for the entire County. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing There are no public housing developments or units planned for the City of Temecula in the next year. HACR will continue to actively support and assist Temecula residents with Housing Choice Vouchers. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership HACR maintains active resident councils at all public housing developments and includes resident members on its Board of Directors. HACR constantly seeks feedback from residents on improvements and planning documents to ensure activities are meeting the needs of residents. HACR maintains a home ownership program for current public housing tenants through its Homeownership Program. HACR also links its Homeownership Program with its Family Self - Sufficiency Program to help households save money for a down payment through an escrow account. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance Not applicable. HACR is designated as a High Performing PHA. Discussion According to the Housing Authority, there are 99 households receiving tenant -based Section 8 vouchers and seven project -based Section 8 vouchers in Temecula. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 53 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i) Introduction The City will invest CDBG funds during the 2019-2020 program year to address high priority needs identified in the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan including preventing homelessness and providing public services to special needs populations including victims of domestic violence and persons with disabilities. Homelessness Prevention Services According to the results of the most recent data available from the bi-annual Point -in -Time Homeless Count (PIT Count) held on January 23, 2018, on any given night in Riverside County, approximately 2,316 people are homeless, which was a 3.7 percent decrease over 2017. (The results of the 2019 PIT have not been released yet.) According to the 2018 PIT, there were 66 homeless persons in Temecula, which was a 22.4 percent decrease over the previous year's count, although the other cities in Southwest Riverside County experienced an increase. To address incidences of homelessness in Temecula and to prevent extremely -low income Temecula families from becoming homeless, the City places a high priority on programs that work to prevent homelessness or rapidly connect homeless individuals with housing and supportive services. To address this need, the City will support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate homelessness including, but not limited to, homelessness prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing. Using CDBG funds, the City will invest in homelessness prevention services by funding City's Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program. Sixty persons are expected to benefit from this service. Community Mission of Hope is expected to assist an additional two persons who are homeless or at -risk of homelessness with housing and food. Services for Residents with Special Needs Analysis of available data and consultation with organizations providing services for special needs populations revealed a high need for a range of additional services including, but not limited to, those concerned with domestic violence and services for persons with disabilities. To address these needs, the City will support one activity that provides services to victims of domestic violence. The SAFE Alternatives for Everyone Program will provide approximately 24 Temecula residents with counseling and support services to help victims of domestic violence and child abuse. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 54 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) including reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs To reach out to unsheltered homeless persons and assess their individual needs to connect them with available emergency shelter and transitional housing resources, the City of Temecula created the Responsible Compassion for the Homeless Program on June 11, 2015. The program is comprised of one sergeant and four (4) full-time Riverside County Housing Outreach Team (HOT) officers specially trained in working with homeless -related problems and knowledgeable about local and regional resources. They provide referrals to local service providers to address the homeless person's needs. The City's CDBG-funded homeless prevention program and Community Mission of Hope will assist two individuals experiencing homelessness. The City of Temecula supports the efforts of the Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) and its member organizations that address homelessness. As described earlier, the City supports local nonprofit agencies who provide emergency rental assistance and housing counseling to low- and moderate -income residents to prevent homelessness. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The City of Temecula supports the efforts of the Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) and its member organizations that address homelessness. As described earlier, the City supports local nonprofit agencies who provide emergency rental assistance and housing counseling to low- and moderate -income residents to prevent homelessness. The City is using CDBG funds for the City's Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program and Community Mission of Hope to connect individuals and families that are homeless or at risk of homelessness with services and financial assistance to help them retain or return to housing and provide food to those in need. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again The City's Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program (HPDP) will connect individuals and families that are homeless or at risk of homelessness with services and financial assistance to help them retain or return to housing. Community Mission of Hope will provide additional support to those who are homeless and are at risk of homelessness. The HPDP program will work closely with the City's Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) officers, who have been connecting chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 55 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) their families, and unaccompanied youth with available resources through the Riverside County CoC, which is comprised of a network of public, private, faith -based, for -profit, and non-profit service providers who utilize several federal, state and local resources to provide services for homeless people. The goal is to help unsheltered homeless people make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units. The non-profit and faith -based community plays a key role in the current CoC system. Hundreds of agencies throughout the County provide programs ranging from feeding the homeless on the street to creating permanent supportive housing opportunities. These services are available to homeless families with children, and single men and women. The non-profit and faith -based community also serves special needs populations, such as victims of domestic violence, veterans, the disabled and youth. To prevent individuals and families who are at risk of homelessness due to domestic violence, the City will provide CDBG funds to the SAFE Alternatives for Everyone Program to assist 55 persons with domestic crisis intervention, domestic violence education groups and training, assistance with restraining orders, safety planning and case management. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs The City participates in the Riverside County CoC. The Riverside County CoC Ten -Year Plan to End Homelessness included a goal to establish Countywide protocols and procedures to prevent people from being discharged from public and private institutions of care into homelessness that will help decrease the number of persons being discharged into homelessness by at least 10 percent annually. This would mean that the proportional share for the City would be a reduction of three homeless persons. The CoC is seeking improve coordination among publicly and privately funded institutions of care and local service agencies in the County of Riverside in order to decrease the number of persons being discharged into homelessness annually. Discussion With limited CDBG resources available, the City is investing CDBG public service funds through the CDBG public service grants. Additionally, the City is investing general funds through the Police Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 56 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Department budget to provide for one sergeant and four full-time Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) Program officers to connect unsheltered homeless individuals and families with emergency shelter, transitional housing and permanent housing opportunities. The program also connects individuals with other services to address special needs such as drug and alcohol rehabilitation and mental health services. The City will continue to take a leadership role in the Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance team meetings, where homeless providers will collaborate in addressing the homeless needs. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 57 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.220(j) Introduction: A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing, such as land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements, environmental protection, cost of land and availability of monetary resources. Barriers to affordable housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful. Based on information gathered during community meetings, the 2017-2021 Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), the Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment Survey, the 2014-2021 City of Temecula Housing Element and market analysis, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Temecula are housing affordability and the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable housing. The two barriers are related in the sense that demand for affordable housing exceeds the supply and insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable housing to meet demand. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment In the development of the 2014-2021 Housing Element, the City evaluated significant public policies affecting affordable housing development such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges and growth limitations. Based on this evaluation, the City determined that it has taken significant steps to ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that may have been a barrier to affordable housing. Moreover, the City is actively engaged with affordable housing developers concerning the siting of affordable housing and ensuring that the entitlement process runs smoothly from inception to completion. The City's Housing Element has provided an affordable housing inventory. On September 25, 2018, the City adopted an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) ordinance, which identifies sites throughout the City where transitional and supportive housing is allowed by right, identify incentives for affordable and senior housing. The City established an AHO on at least 100 acres. After the establishment of the AHO, sites identified will require: • Minimum densities of 20 units per acre; • 50% of the need (1,003 units) will be on sites allowing exclusively residential uses; Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 58 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) • Multi -family uses at the densities established under the AHO will be allowed by right, without a conditional use permit. The Affordable Housing Overlay was adopted by City Council on September 25, 2018. In Program Year 2019-2020, the City, in conjunction with the Temecula Trekkers, will host a presentation to educate 25 local housing advocates on fair housing issues and affordable housing issues. The City will continue to host multiple forums related to homelessness and those at risk of homelessness. The City has updated their fair housing webpage so that the information can be provided into 103 languages. This tool is available for all City web pages. Discussion: Although the City no longer has Redevelopment funding, the City will continue to leverage its local funds to attract private and other available public resources, including land conveyed to the City for affordable housing, to facilitate affordable housing development. This strategy will increase the supply of affordable housing and preserve existing affordable housing in the City. To address housing affordability and the lack of monetary resources for affordable housing, the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan - Strategic Plan calls for the investment of its Tax Allocation Bond proceeds over the next five (5) years to address its affordable housing needs. The City is currently working with a developer for the construction of 60 affordable housing units, called Vine Creek, 21 of which are set aside for persons with disabilities. In addition, the City adopted of an Affordable Housing Overlay ordinance as an incentive for the construction of affordable housing by the private sector. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 59 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-85 Other Actions — 91.220(k) Introduction: In the implementation of the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG resources to address obstacles in meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead -based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty -level families, develop institutional structure and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate -income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources, the high cost of housing, and the lack of availability of home improvement financing in the private lending industry. To address these obstacles, the City is investing CDBG funds through the 2019-2020 Action Plan in projects that provide grants to low- and moderate -income homeowners for home improvements, projects that provide public services to low- and moderate -income seniors, veterans, and people and those with special needs, and projects that prevent homelessness. To address underserved needs, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG investments for program year 2019-2020 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing In the implementation of the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG funds to preserve and maintain affordable housing through the Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repair Program, which will provide minor exterior home repairs for approximately five (5) owner -occupied single-family or manufactured housing units. Actions planned to reduce lead -based paint hazards The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. Because nearly all of the City's housing stock was built after 1978, it is rare for the City to encounter lead -based paint hazards as part of its housing rehabilitation program. Should a hazard exist, the City will require lead - based paint testing and risk assessments for each property assisted that was built prior to January 1, 1978 and safe work practices or abatement into the scope of work as required to reduce lead - based paint hazards in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 60 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty -level families The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan - Strategic Plan and this Annual Action Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty -level families by: • Supporting activities that expand the supply of housing that is affordable to low- and moderate -income households; • Supporting activities that preserve the supply of decent housing that is affordable to low - and moderate -income households; • Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness; • Supporting housing preservation programs that assure low income households have a safe, decent and appropriate place to live; • Supporting public services for low- and moderate -income residents including seniors, veterans and those with special needs and those at -risk of homelessness offered by nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG public services grants; and • Promoting economic opportunity for low- and moderate -income residents who own microenterprise businesses (five (5) or fewer employees) or who are starting a new microenterprise business. In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide pathways out of poverty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. Additionally, in California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CaIWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together, these programs provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing, nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence and mental illness. Actions planned to develop institutional structure The institutional delivery system in Temecula is high functioning and collaborative —particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector comprised of a network of capable non-profit organizations that are delivering a full range of services to residents. Strong City departments anchor the administration of HUD grant programs and the housing, community and economic development activities that are implemented by the City support and enhance this existing institutional structure. The City of Temecula is in negotiations with affordable housing developers, which propose to use Tax Allocation Bond proceeds to ensure that the needs of low - Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 61 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) and moderate -income residents are met as envisioned within the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan - Strategic Plan. One development, Vine Creek, has been entitled, and will provide 60 new affordable units in the future. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies To enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies, the City will continue consulting with and inviting the participation of a wide variety of agencies and organizations involved in the delivery of housing and supportive services to low- and moderate - income residents in Temecula. Discussion: In the implementation of the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG resources to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead -based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty -level families, develop institutional structure and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 62 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(1)(1,2,4) Introduction: In the implementation of programs and activities under the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan, the City of Temecula will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program income, forms of investment, overall low- and moderate -income benefit for the CDBG program and recapture requirements for the HOME program. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before $0 the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be $0 used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's Strategic Plan 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements $0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the $0 planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. 5. The amount of income from float -funded activities $0 Total Program Income $0 Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities 0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of three (3) years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00% Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 63 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Discussion: In the implementation of programs and activities under the 2019-2020 Annual Action Plan, the City of Temecula will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program income, forms of investment and overall low- and moderate -income benefit for the CDBG program. Action Plan 2019-2020 Pg. 64 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Consolidated Plan and Action Plan Appendices Alternate / Local Data Sources.......................................................................................Appendix A Citizen Participation and Consultation........................................................................... Appendix 6 Grantee Unique Appendices........................................................................................... Appendix C Grantee SF-424s and Action Plan Certifications.............................................................Appendix D Appendix A Alternate / Local Data Sources 1 Data Source Name Riverside County 2018 Homeless Count Report List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. The County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services Homeless Programs Unit Provide a brief summary of the data set. There are 2,316 adults and children who are homeless during a point -in -time in the County of Riverside according to the Riverside County 2018 Homeless Count and Subpopulation Survey. This represents an 3.7% decrease when compared to the number of homeless persons who were counted in 2017. Of the 2,316 persons, 1,685 were unsheltered and 631 were sheltered. What was the purpose for developing this data set? To meet HUD requirements. Provide the year (and optionally month, or month and day) for when the data was collected. The homeless count was conducted on the streets during the hours of 5 a.m. and 9 a.m. on January 23, 2018. The count was also conducted on the same day in shelters and transitional housing programs throughout the county. Briefly describe the methodology for the data collection. Data collection was obtained using HUD -required methods for the conduct of a PIT Count. Describe the total population from which the sample was taken. Per HUD's instructions, a person was considered homeless, and thus counted, only when he/she fell within the HUD -based definition by residing in places not meant for human habitation, such as cars, parks, sidewalks, and abandoned buildings; in an emergency shelter; and In transitional housing for homeless persons. Describe the demographics of the respondents or characteristics of the unit of measure, and the number of respondents or units surveyed. See screen NA-40. 2 Data Source Name 2018 CoC Homeless Program Inventory Point in Time (PIT) Count List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. Riverside County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) Provide a brief summary of the data set. Provides the inventory of emergency, transitional and permanent supportive housing beds. What was the purpose for developing this data set? To monitor the effectiveness of HUD programs in addressing the needs of the homeless population How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? The PIT covers the entire County's homeless population including Temecula. What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? January 23, 2018 What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete. Appendix B Citizen Participation and Consultation Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Affirmed Housing Affordable Housing AMCAL Multi -Housing Affordable Housing Assistance League of Temecula Valley Youth Atria Senior Living Senior Autism Society Inland Empire Health Better Days ARF Seniors Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County Youth Services Bridge Housing Affordable Housing Building Industry Association Housing California Apartment Association Inland Empire Rental Property California State University San Marcos, Temecula Education Cameron Historical Building Affordable Housing Canine Support Teams Persons with Disabilities Catholic Charities Social Services Circle of Care Ministries Food Bank City of Murrieta Adjacent City City of Temecula Various departments Coachella Valley Housing Coalition Affordable Housing Community Access Center Disabled Community Mission of Hope Homeless provider Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Comprehensive Autism Center Health Services County of Riverside Department of Social Services Social Services County of Riverside Economic Development Agency Local Government County of Riverside Health Department Health Services Riverside University Health System — Behavioral Health, Homeless Housing Opportunities, Partnerships & Education Program Mental Health Court Appointed Special Advocate of Riverside County Youth Services Creekside Senior Apartments Senior Housing Desert AIDS AIDS Service Provider Economic Development of Southwest California Economic Development Fair Housing Counsel of Riverside County, Inc. Fair Housing Foothill AIDS AIDS Fountain Glen at Temecula Senior Housing Front Street Plaza Affordable Housing Go Banana Special Needs GRID Alternatives Affordable Housing Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley Affordable Housing Heritage Mobile Home Estates Affordable Housing Hitzke Consulting Affordable Housing Hospice of the Valleys Healthcare Housing Authority of the County of Riverside Public Housing Authority Hugs Foster Family Agency Developmental disabilities Iglesia Bautista del Valle de Temecula Faith Based Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Inland Regional Center Developmental disabilities Jamboree Housing Affordable Housing Jesus Love Church Faith based John Stewart Company Affordable Housing Ken Follis Realtor, developer League of Women Voters Non profit Legacy Ridge Developmental disabilities Love of Christ Fellowship Church Faith based Madera Vista Apartments Affordable Housing Michelle's Place Healthcare Mission Village Apartments Affordable Housing Mt San Jacinto College Education NAACP Protected Class Nu -Way International Christian Ministries Faith based Oak Tree Apartments Affordable Housing Our Nicholas Foundation Autism Palomar Heritage Affordable Housing Pechanga Casino and Resort Employer Path of Life Ministries Homeless provider Portola Terrace Apartments Affordable Housing Project Touch Homeless provider Rancho California Apartments Affordable housing Rancho Community Church Faith based Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Rancho Creek Apartments Affordable Housing Rancho Damacitas Foster Youth Rancho en Espanol Faith based Rancho West Apartments Affordable Housing Renee Jennex Small Family Health care Riverbank Village Apartments Affordable Housing Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Domestic Violence Riverside City and County Continuum of Care Homeless provider Riverside County Office on Aging Senior Services Riverside County Veterans Services Veterans Riverside County Sheriff's Department Crime protection Riverside Transit Agency Transportation Rose Again Foundation Foster Youth SAFE Alternatives for Everyone Domestic Violence Safety Research Associates, Inc. Special Needs and Senior Housing Senior Care Referral Specialists Senior Services Senior Citizens Service Center Food Bank Food Bank Single Mothers in Rewarding Fellowship (SMURF) Youth Services Solari Enterprises Affordable Property Management Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors Housing St. Catherine's Catholic Church Faith based State Council on Developmental Disabilities Developmental Disabilities TEAM Evangelical Assistance Ministries Food Bank Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type City of Temecula Planning Commission City Commission City of Temecula Community Services Commission City Commission City of Temecula Public Safety Commission City Commission Visit Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Business Community Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission Homeless Services Provider Temecula Reflection Townhouses Affordable Housing Temecula Homeless Coalition Homeless provider Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Business Community Temecula Valley Historical Society Non -Profit Organization Temecula Valley Hospital Health Services Temecula Valley Therapy Disabled Temecula Valley Unified School District Education Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association Employer The Center for Life Change Drug Treatment U.S. Vets Initiative Veterans VA Loma Linda Healthcare Veterans Vintage View Apartments Affordable housing Voice of Children Youth Services Warehouse at Creekside Apartments Affordable Housing Wells Fargo Business Community Western Riverside Council of Governments Regional Government Note: For some of the above agencies, there are multiple stakeholders, but the agency is listed once. Public Hearing Notices PROOF OF [PUBLICATION (2015.5 L.C.P.) STATE: OF CALIFORNIA County of Riverside I am a cilinn ofthe LINiea 51OI&4 and a reside111 of tree rOkW" OI'OM501a: I Orr, 1 M th& t,r iagh &On yeas OW nol o parry to or kilow@ifed in the obovu-en-wW nw1t19F. I o n fhA pr ftiohl dirk or the prinf er of THE CALIFORNIAN rdnFdW of N+a 5dn DxW urmyd TODww A now vapor or gGmral clrt:uiation. pubgshad DA1LW In the City of Temecula, CcPramld, 925YO. Counry or Oyai-Rde, Irree Laxa dudldal INSWIe:l, and whim n&wspep&r h{x been o*xgccil" o riews ovet of geftmr 6mij1a1iOn 6y lho Suoorkx Cdurt Cr the County of Rlvouide. Stare 4f Cplfamio, undw the doia of Fvhruary 26, 1991. Cale Number XM5, Wo the notice, of which the am&xn-d Is a palled copy (sei in type not priCilpt fhun nonpomil]I has hepn pLciiStbd in ouch f&QLAW Or)d onli•lS lbue of said new'J'sGoper and not n any vippler,,-rl l Ihefeof• o11 the fallowing dates, to wT: September 1aTM, 2018 I certify (ex decrore) under pe ou fy of per)M i" the lDre9OJrtg is kve ar1d CUlreCt- Dated at TEMECULA, Colifomia, this IV day of Sepdetmber, 2015 Anaifo Pebto - Legal hd,,aKrbng Thdi GvINwilm3n -an EdAYon of Me Son DYego Urf+un Tribune 2IW1 Nanc4a CaWomlo Rd. "e 103. TeFTF iAa. CA T2590 CITY OF TEMECULA NQTICE OF PUBLIC Rf VIEW ENGLI5k1 AD# 5865987 NOTICE OF PUSLI E RI V IIII.Mr FUN Tn■ IfIrY Ce TFI M9C1JiA Com ru.Tr oTyMLOPPAENt eL[S{N GIAhf ICOOGI CON150LIOATE4 ANNUAL PIRFGRMANCL & E V ALV ATIO" RI PORT eC;►IFII F OR F INCA& YEAR 2017-201I NOTWE IS HJJIJrN�FIY GFVJEN 4W eh. Ciq d F.r A MI Iwp.W •e awn F.aI-14ponptAPEAI ra M1778,AIT4.Iuh1lSilr.'17•� 11(MmMew-hAftmn IIn,"mF+w�vg0 .Ir 11-JrY plbrd .erfn prr,m ,.{,.+" I ..drl FIdj"I Aeyd.l4a 14 }a {fA: 71 M[ yew an7 xnleref muux.l per•W 0".M 1epowAd, 1#. 7p1i aaI runs nlwgt Uvrrlim FlaorlCCof nrxf6r FtaFlTHrjIFj.N11 it IPWILd40 n.spil FFAurWjjhp a•,n I.l wrlrirwl• C+rfL iy J#17-i411 ern Vr pinhMd to Irf {IPI GuMll Ar a UC'.sal Un Iv Iora•p 41. oxrtE +rpnlneu A. J'pq TYME: Tqp. �. L4CATaFF: [trLwrF��{hFIT11Fli �Igpp FAM 51 �FA. T.IMiw. ii 41sFQ it J,e �xteMr uT Lnr i.u•Id .i# i1F#IM FIFIMF �IMIIFNI oil Dy #IFM1 {AIkIt mA rdl W sv rr.IN m rle 9 i oF.rF�1i rgi..r1 � IVIM,b.r.4gnFIM IXIJCI. �Cle err011Nfl MivY4 ".a �1N %M DOWPAIN M M#IIIM J111 WW-- Oh.Wpigrl iMUNI re}aaa,s rleFL7r N Talad. ha /rr C1,rF.laalA An.uaF Fx1.•nin.F FYrFrul R+.Ur1 �CAR@II rM IFF 1011-�gCMA11111FF AhR'4.mF��l F6n G11.I 1SU#41 1019 Arin•*.R. 14 iA+BI }F++1s +• wlLw.wl ## Fr*1 flMr„r+M• I•. n,.elnlF Irl{FI ren lolj- MirbrG#Iw �alllwrr+TNy+IBI TIFF F �MWwl.+tl „It. YI..,arllr M.n, iho.1 n, PW11H� F r1.nxll1 F+rrr"`•riT PU LIC CC MMf1A' EMr �!. Gar Lapel wre J.Y YC—v .ti w.M M e.laF,nn11etliMls M p*a..sl.Ia +• ooa uw Wow 1 F.Y[FLL CA 9.11M ►ua IF, Li►—V 16IFan.i ow Te.Vula {A FYS#J Ys atlrhsll.. ,rf fah {Ilfif . f Rsai: +^ a'•e Lp v +e rp�.laiA M, i�'I IY. tiF[ d Martdf ■ rAr.I w.lm LOnlerrf l ! rr {A F Y nFl.lhrw riUa1 ti IM 00 iWW T fYr. jd m- *A Wo,Ir m GF#irlF.r A. WX 7hr} 1'p#J4IA.A 1F#1#AI#N 1S S41 R QUd4itl rid nrfRhl trh0dr rt F -* rear CiTFa -0 4 F1k~4 N 10A w- Wap, PR0110 M1INOWPA A A~ WO Ad DIr #i I.w, W {Ire ft OhP"""" Do P-Mm e I W Mann 1h..L i...DA& C-14— "Al" reu nq r- l.A .1: W 11 mnl +I,nn IrFlnncl. Ln!A.v% wdh iy 1 -d— nr+r+q 00 J11sYF► Jerr,�o�l ACCCSSIOWTT TO MECTING5 ANO OOCUIpIfRTS IN 4 Fhe.4 ra-*a t4{Fry 10FP+•Ir1* i7~ W of GF NOL-bm•#h+Q � WIL0 u. dmueAmvlw*rnll GtlIA1Wn+W MAf« r@N Yip w. a6A+nrrr.mwll Aa1 ]00I.'1R Fait M.IAIAQ ACe &NO 1M AFFh11MW/FI NnIFrr1 8[r W 411 'd*W1s I FFU rFprf p rirl, d—miLs n in W&fiii r Akmil, WI. W xP mill •46I0-d" AAotl AF Xi#m.+11#mi Your rMwdif If OR r.grrF F IIIa n it-ridaw ivonmo47w 14 FW4.r rrIni 4pdalr.r,en nA hlelnLln+i I�e—un pW�liwmMdHW04hTKp pkiF—flAd A.{f J#PaJ]I. PYYFtt*n§n01k B44OW NOFA Workshop Publications PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Riverside I orn a drl of the Uri, Ie+d pujeS c,rwj a •usideni of the County GcTesukt I vn oleer Uve ape of eighteen years and not a party la or nierested in Iha abowe-onHued molter. I orn 1ha prin,[ipal cbwe of the prium of THE CALIFQRNIAN An Ecfte- of Pao 5. , DK jr ✓w--rr.bL.a.r A newspglwr of general circurotion, pubkhed DAILY in *I - City of TE;i eCUlo, Coifo"o 92m, CQwty of zwerooe. Three Lake Ju:ffcioh District, and whictl nsw7ppper Ntt4 been odudicatec a no5Awwof 4f general circulation Py the Supella Cart of the County al Rlv4ms4tle- State of Calforrim Ln,de'r tree dole of Febftxwy 26, 1991, cDle r+urnt5 r XR105; Ihpt the notice, of which 1h6 ftWdIkQd 17 0 prrnl�-d dopy (set in type nqt gTKi er Ihon nnnpgr$ll), h M been pvtAJ-ed in eo&+ regular and entire issue C1f smrf newspaper area not rn uny suippiedl'18nl thereof. on the foliowing pales, la wit September IOT", 2018 r cerhry (a [leclareJ n> er penofty of penury tttof the foregoing is true oral rnrreCt- Dot,vd of TEMECULA. Cinlifornia. this IOTH day of September. 2019 Ancliso Pbhlo - LAgol AdV9ttrSkV The CaRlorrllan - an rditn of the San Diego Urilon Tribune 29"1 Rancho Collamlo Rd. SuNe 103, TemeculD, CA 92590 CITY of TEMECULA NOTICE or PUBLIC REVIEW SPANISH VILI - 1-74y : AVre0 Oi AuOrlyduh. PUb UC.A V Ill VI SIGH ■JIAA EL ATUNTAAreETD OE LA CIUDA0 DE TE M ECVLA 44RRADON GEL A.PORT5 01 LA E V A L V AGON DEL 0 ESEMPe NO ANl1AL CON LCL rDA00 ICA PERI PARA EE AND rI5CAL 2e1 7 2014 POR LALMO a 4A fir NVi1FICA qM d AJrr4xENMV de r C.— A. 7-ONIS11E POPESi N ■EwiYr i., elpw de IN bwwad" tlM IWrrWanu M,,1 for* /11 wl IrTIIL � «r,�.1 w ., 2dt7.JeLl d. sPhr d., 404. GF4 EI +re..EErEI .0 k lra ill-ii V/Wl ,h R pA. F a1 ha..d ld YMIeMr.MEN+I.arrr. Ipi6ow0 15 +Y'�P*IrRmi— .411 r Ed meet. B M n.�.M'MRn y *. prs.sa rer..oh. ., N 116•EI'YM'rA.r rJ6 lr [.n N.w.lwal.L .1]si��xru ADEAIIi PON IrhealOOE LA PRf WE TAIMt�F� NOTIFICA A.+ lI wrdatr M IRt" Ilt It Wo Wear' ad I)mw-o** Artiif CpirAT1M ,Uri' wl . W. N1 r Ell w1 P.—*& ' Lw.trj. Ak k'm pJn M IIFnlA1M Iw 4 %K :art M -NJ e'deq.ndi' rRCMAt wJ$d.'eel'wnd* idli l Gli 70PP LUOAe, [Inu.A 1 ZISJy1 Sl lrtt Tq,o V. ur. VL 4I5W to "4 ID" rJ. Al (0-00 rJkrwip1I E.1URl fdmdeAd'a1 �dh -a& 54hre el handJar alit ['.YEAS el lull IC'E p0iiinLli t 1 e' UIdJ,I1nMr d# 4i.."dA r Dr,Andw Urhs1R Jr'vL #[hJJR, Uh54el 41+13. W iA WM JA lhQlrL w4vtogOiNii# In m'rl.nn'd.1 M,, .Ix'.iu.Y/ 6.p.l.niwiw dr vi..eMs r ies.'•alb lihaia dr Im I'%�ww l..,Te6 m14Ci, f' Irynlln„Mlo- 0! rllrtiull r4 ASeNllt4 w eert W w eat Nap4n. da Y S�E•Rr,hh * P (OWMo IS P SdwoftCR iCAPEIc PFI! JAd 2P17-d01a tlk PY4glY'.J Muyl M'whPA'Ir rANJ.R dME MMrm NMStl'•s „Rh'd ECP116 earery.5[•.dr.,1-� �AM.r.in,.eneyui4nmeNo-dr4{..had orri e'M"tyaNk.Iwn a.l M. rllgl Je1ml, se rnl" v 4r 'o Vhadd Wy now lY/dNNo .. nl'Il•eor A.w N ITloll Sr An'nle Afto.da. Admiak d CJ/O bAW ar CJI"►tl M N Ap� aE a C.,d.d Nr4o" wen rn r, yet e.d.MM 142111101 Y er.h.Lsr.m. rr.,exw..xo.'rl St1 r-lOJi iaLlelfTAlr•O M]eL108 OBOE d.l h.n.d. d. rAPIII W0a Mpird 5 M4 x.iWi- PAW Hier u0Newln Ayuwlf.wl.wr. d. 1•r,...rr "T.-.alo OrP.rla.nawee WNeee11. C..,r...liizrin fmx• �i. ' A i.543 w5 wt f•'7 WWI loses Pwb11[E do TE. ewo Ao ow N. Ir rMru Tx'w'W. (A 4 259 2 kNOMI. H LM4d0 MI tAryE'I. w..IWJ. rr -WA: x R"bkh'w d ATo ss40 ap M.rd.nmml. d.1h V .iW.,. rE'rxea.'rDdG Fl P"Ih�'d11 p.iLhk 1 I..L.ril M dx'r4r PRr .W IL. waif .I (ArIR led., Io< [.n,rnt— r h._ Al d.n.SiE t 11 1'r,.r41=4 JI FTu„kai_w'YIIrwd.id, Tr,m[ul.. �r.,rra..W YGeJrrlly [.n'�.A'r "p'rW L., d. Ar IAv; pM1 h "+ rl A dr xl.,n.h,! dr JG' l Pnpllle 19E^' 1v+ w r.."Ie ,elrvn5e d b.I,W4d JiI CJJ'EE pvegln M+'A.F}4C41 1}Y il�{ar W lry'.,la Seprnw dr Gran riD hRun[amlrnL 1de la Gu OYd de is Wi Lai p...itoi,wi. - W04 19 i. 506 NAIr1 . w1• relne ,0% L."i.r=a 11,II 7Ah1Yn J�lE.Ade.'ir A' LelllrnR i951. Rh6 S777 . pw [wrr. detlrhnd. JI dental'. lye el - ",1 CO.O. i weO'�*la qN 'e w—n. wart d,,,. A LAf JWNTAI V bG{UINlNTOS O ar.4m"w PW 11.I. mom . &seer w iodi Awe-M0 .'A 1w r't" W4 4,.'0 In d.&hw eElrtr.% wT. J11 y E.A r.m,rL r lq, i. Am.1.w... s.r I2nuR..d.dn OW iE Hi , r tft OR ir0r,arY A reA it >R Y LO S& W ne'.iJ JRm. v La Lar d1 ET.E'r'11 AgMMlpl{M 1,.11lll.iaNl Mr,.`paM opid---IwyiB.o<...hlr . AWMIN-PIN EI.I IS JlEEe11 MBE IN nqNS.rlE e+ail Gli E se PoPlE. Id our AWE!" 40P." IMLSIr rli4: d pope 4100pp4N Ep. � E parrot w, a' am-01 * r1'SlL #tlVYIM Yeiel A dem d l *on IN, Vy' c .,J..Wm A II Oenn►i0Lu-r,iM.rMiMM IO.rt-LiLY11 wu i1Ilk i1.0 do IN1 Jk*4 . P..111,10wil Y10T1. Seo"23 VtD FOR CLERKWCORnING STAAAP PROOF OF PUBLICATION (201 S.s C. C. P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Riverside I am a cif¢en of the ilnlled States and o resident of the County aforesaid- t am over the age of eightean years and rTal a party to or inloWesiOd in the above -entitled molder. I am th9 pfndippll Clerk of the printer of THE CALIF ORNIAN An Ecll on of R59 Son Uego UrkrrThbune A newspapar of genwol riraulcAQn. published DA LY in the CI1y of T(wr3culrr, Coril r:a, 92590, County of Riverside, Threa Lake Jvdicrol District, and wNch reewspopef has been odlLxfcated a rl.awspaper or general circiAnHan by the Superior Court of tn,@ County of Riversioe, Slofe of Cordomia, udder the date of F913naory 26, 1491, Case Numbef 209 K&, thot the notice, ofvrhich the onnexed 'is a printed copy fiat in type not srndlar than nonpardsll), has: bean published in each regular anU enire 135Ue of Sid newspaper and slot in any sL pplamenl ihereofr on the following dates. to wit: November 14TH, 2010 J ce dily (or decfaml uncfer penafl'y of perJ'ury i'FraJ` the foregoing rs here and clarr•ecf. Dated ct TEMEC{JLA, California, this 141" day of November, 2015 Anoisa Pablo - Legd AdNealsing The carfomran - an EdIllon Qf t a San dlvgu Won Tribune 28441 Rwr-ho CaYtamio Rd Sups 103, Te rin:03, CA 42S9O CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE SPANISH Ab# 5986518 AV UPATA MJE6ITO ME I -A CIIJOAp {>E 'h fft"LA &visa 10! RELFI'oldra comij 4rfhRIR PROQRAMA Of Will QLaf ALES FOARA EL 093ARROLL0 G9MLA4 n-ARiv iwi 5} P Ai""tlarn'e1k4 do la {hoer of romewi 4hot anpalr illy li2p*s dr: hugwn 171 Subs-dre 510halei omb ei Dma-iollb Coin -Am okUMG,Par I-m"aa inglarl pa pirrr Od' Dq—l+ir w de Yha.uda T D—dl aUi Luna d. W. E—ft Unidui IHhlp, yp JY s+11as r�� lbglls:. R rrunlartudlle Jhdra eat ve"ndo Mllrirudu pus InndrP4 (DW i-aantradda hdlpINdi'llil idkJUNWIUMnd41AI11rIlIUliEPMUGpJfdf1AA0FIVJIJpl9-]q, Sr 11—An J Lobo ms xr -- an M Cowo [a+yrxyrlo Of len+e{alb Temtwm WilhuelaY CtAEW 208% Ill 510"7, T"fulJ, r;ld-1A *1 JuIRY9C 24 do N4sriWrrM6re 461 2018 ■ I.. 2AO rM Y ■ 1.. 6100 pin_ El prapOdrtQ at esin Hlfla Kes Wrl drWuhl el rragrinlA dF CD[IG dEl lwillilminlla y xn Ist,tlx Lau .: AAr FIKAI ldrncb a: IN agdil-LUK+iii dI- Ilnrs IPIi{IhC'L e3a �1i' 511729rrH�8h VUErrrnfnlr �Liks re Ples+olrxan una &MEhud pwlafeellhr tondos 4 iM do l dwnlarr+eraaue la Ciudad de TEnimla. TDdis ras agent 1 a eMididt5 qua wptliw au€le1'ne de Inudossle CDN deaeu LalnPleu, u sd�Kdud. 1a16s 16L La..lJdanny rtl111!LId4t 1Nfl irni1?ja 1 j5M? 1]S andlaeiallel n1 rdl faididal k An r{lkilm en Al geyr�a11410R4+11ra�rp ylas llkftiAdkbde llylendar{lafiudid de relnmlA1 Inurlr+any J is — W& [a•[dr-adas rn la rkhmm do IN rah —dadai dw eOhG pan fl F4n ale Gacrrirprnh Amol iaAP. porws flgL*} lryin. Pi*+a N 4iaii ai MgL20. fl aw eamaaaa eL I &pull. d.L ZOV Lei W.nhr rL rn eronpgea.ia ipaotiirtl6 pwaa Ja adJud'OfAn de rb.WL Jnuales. Rifrdki.l dd cranoomfn. pare la Aarp[Jrcww. dr Farhdni did, Gull r %ililw/r54e (DOG of "Inadav IN A d. Ir+ni..k gdtrl alb ` V64A phVIil do (DOG 7 falla'r to as sftibA Para 56Ydhudh Er 2Ir dr Aari.mli,r Ohl2:G18 FuNa Enna Para m mrlah da Wlgl(Vjth €d 13 dirJislnaarl III MIIa Rh+lldfldr'(I1nll[#de F11ill3Ji En Mum del 2{llg Iq+np6n 60hhra de 10 dial del Swim dri ale+ d4 QfPmrC Aen"aI IML M Wad of AEril de 20' 9 r AYdimcia fLdllradrl Cdfxetrhbw p► del Ayd.wA b-4+e AAp Ee4Wdef2{ll9 €awmw Bel PrbyrarniA W N I dr Jull.dal 10% hgPer;a+ua errra7 iTl eCljrdlC{LiM14a J}i wrF+Klprtnles Or drifidl.s I.Jumoi,1200 LLMg4116a pisqumar�dgifavor mmurilry•feewLynnRtlly-Ltlmer.Whim sr,no-p.lm 64r -&& Al M11 3%.5172 o — [mrw Lfie7r8— Iynn.IrhH.+tDae.m,Lae{.qb._ gat Pe-10-"2ut ueteJnen adapldd— —Also o un riadiwior d.h.n prrrfnlar w pfrk4n IIIrd S HMIld ands lie rJd ef,11Ia1e3 µlit 1,11 "qua hr Ay.nl{,lna-No pang Iftwir Qua Las u+a+s.fadtt r+pe[�axh +erg ■w ublrrrrr rrri[ hrarnh 6e 56bit tl wd0l4rn,1 y de3[dryal It so --laird, rmAe el slap web del A1wallhilide dF li 6atlad dt Trn�.[ala a h[[p.'ilenrarnKaa�o-r.•i09[ Ia�Ylq R: irl 74 �F NP.riY TIiRi � SG 7 L !1 li61 Y �, No comments. Summary of Public Comments at Public Hearings and Community Meetings Public Hearing Tuesday, September 25, 2018 Technical Workshop for Notice of Funding Availability November 29, 2018 Staff answered questions regarding application submittal process and eligibility issues. Public Hearing Tuesday, April 23, 2019 To be inserted prior to submission to HUD. Application Workshops November 29, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. 201,9-2020 CAM FLINGING APPLICATION woRKSHOP Thursday, None bber 29, 2018 z.on PM Temecula Community Canter, 29816 Pujnl Shack, Temecula, CA 92594 SIGN -IN SHEET NAME A6E1d r PM ME NWMREM i?-MAM ADDRESS �LwJ�+4sa6 B+�,LfS'i,z'�t<7 a�uhjd+M.4���- f-fri} .zfaP�s„ YPtM�s if]�r:J Q`-5a5=1Ts5 }Ee ' iW !' a '-i'.r l,� I �T` Iql L-OVj r'IC i�Paun51r-t4ZJ W'd{(a LSbU f1ffW Hr4�j@r 1;, yti N 14AKE AGCMCV I PMWM MMMWR E-MAJ.E ADDRESS k e� r. lk[ vG-7d6c Ynrr� C fi � a. �" �� v,ell z � 2 P �P"' Ef 11a L �y ,qf £fi.LA I I, S�J �iU�` I.M046 5� SaFr Fa4u..r..�. 4.a Yp1�5 s. - g5555i�.�dR4+ �1. rY,y,u4p,r f9..i.4�i' 20L9-IO ZO CORG FUN DING APPLICATION WORK SN OP Thursday, November 29, Zola 6:00 PM 'TM a .Ia Cwnmun" COrttr, 28816 Pujo Street, T--da, CA 92590 STGN-TM SHEET IMAM! AGZ74CY PHOW MNpMSER C-A%ZL ADDRESS '��., �u NdGl ssoc. KI • a5ag S�[-�$"!•7'f67 s5��ayE�. ®,r�,�. Finance Subcommittee Meeting Sign -in Sheet February 26, 2019 Crr-N_rAl C"'U"Ur �cxm-es �wa�- C ��s �c`x�►s C 1u17 Appendix C Grantee Unique Appendices TEMECULA - LARGEST EMPLOYERS 2017 Employer Number of Industry / Sector Employees Pechanga Resort & Casino 45000 Pechanga Parkway Temecula, CA 92592 3,800 Gaming -Entertainment (888) 732-4264 www.pechan a.com Temecula Valley Unified School Dist. 31350 Rancho Vista Rd. Temecula, CA 92592 2,961 Public Education (951) 506-7961 www.tvusd.kl2.ca.us Abbott Vascular 26531 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 2,000 Medical Manufacturing (951) 914-2400 www.abbott.com PHS Medline 41980 Winchester Road Temecula, CA 92590 900 Medical Supply (951) 296-2600 www.phsves.com Temecula Valley Hospital 31700 Temecula Parkway Temecula, CA 92592 650 Hospital (951) 331-2200 www.temeculavalleyhospital.com Walmart 32225 Temecula Parkway Temecula, CA 92592 600 Retail (951) 506-7613 www.walmart.com Number of Employer Industry / Sector Employees Infinean Technologies America's Corp 41915 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 585 Wafer Chip/Conductors (951) 676-7500 www.infineon.com Macy's 40780 Winchester Road Temecula, CA 92591 420 Retail (951) 541-3333 www.macys.com Milgard 26879 Diaz Road Temecula, CA 92590 400 Windows & Doors (951) 296-1400 www.mill rd.com Costco Wholesale 26610 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 376 Warehouse (951) 719-2000 www.costco.com EMD Millipore Corporation 28820 Single Oak Drive Temecula, CA 92590 330 Bio-Tech (951) 676-8080 www.emdmillipore.com City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 313 Local Government (951) 694-6444 www.temeclulaca.gov FFF Enterprises 41093 County Center Dr. Temecula, CA 92591 303 Wholesale Distributors (951) 296-2500 www.fffenterprises.com Number of Employer Industry / Sector Employees DCH Auto Group Temecula 26755 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 293 Auto Dealerships (951) 699-4444 www.dchtemecula.com Channell Corporation 26040 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 264 Thermo Plastic Enclosures (951) 719-2600 www.channellcomm.com McDonald's (Corporate Office) 30111 Technology Drive, Ste. 120 Murrieta, CA 92563 262 Restaurant (951) 677-2098 www.mcdonalds.com Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac 27360 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92589 234 Auto Sales & Repair (951) 699-2699 www.paradiseautos.com Temecula Creek Inn 44501 Rainbow Canyon Rd. Temecula, CA 92592 245 Golf Resort (951) 694-1000 www.temeculacreekinn.com The Scotts Company 42375 Remington Avenue Temecula, CA 92590 120-244 Equipment Manufacturing (951) 719-1700 www.scotts.com Home Depot #1028 32020 Temecula Parkway Temecula, CA 92592 191 Building Materials (951) 303-6768 www.homedepot.com Temecula Valley Toyota 26631 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 187 Auto Sales & Repair (951) 694-0575 www.Tvtoygta.com Number of Employer Industry / Sector Employees Air Bus DS Communications 42505 Rio Nedo Temecula, CA 92590 180 Emergency Communication Systems (951) 719-2100 www.airbus-dscomm.com Lowes #775 40390 Winchester Rd. Temecula, CA 92591 170 Building Materials (951) 296-1618 www.lowes.com Target 29676 Rancho California Road Temecula, CA 92591-5283 166 Retail (951) 676-2668 www.target.com Pacific Hydraulic Services/MWA 42355 Rio Nedo Temecula, CA 92590 155 Electric Motor Repair (951) 695-1008 www.phsmwa.com WinCo Foods 40435 Winchester Road Temecula, CA 92591 154 Super Market (951) 676-4595 www.wincofoods.com BJ'S Restaurant & Brewery 26500 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 150 Restaurant (951) 252-8370 www.bosrestaurants.com Gosch Ford Lincoln Mercury 26895 Ynez Road Temecula, CA 92591 150 Auto Sales & Repair (951) 699-1302 www.goschfordtemecuIa.net Employer Number of Employees Industry / Sector JCP 40640 Winchester Road Temecula, CA 92591 150 Retail (951) 296-5558 www.jcpenny.com Opto 22 43044 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 150 Automation Controls (951) 695-9299 www.opto22.com City of Temecula Map of Eligible CDBG Areas N+nr Yo[ Lpn�R. Ra 54$,94 A [ ad 432A7 w6m 432.41 1 i 496.00 0- ..2 4318 432.18 1 � 4B6,44 3 Y 4n17 n° & 432-10 b 432.87 r 32.1 t ,# a, 432.1 432M 1 ,a "� 512,4U 432.16 432.6 432,62 2,21) 432,74 432.62 432 432.46 432 2 432.64 ,4 1 1 512.40 a 432.65 yr� 1 1 p 432.22 Ka 432.56 432.57 h a rw'n 3 2 s ° r r++ 3167 ■qy 1 5 1 42-90 kR J M 4US2 M54 1 2 432. 2 City of Temecula -01 TY C68, - LOW AND MODERATE INCOME AREA NAP aninam ra nr. s DATA fA6 or February 14 21110} LEGEND -CITY WuNDPRY LOW AND MODERATE INCOME BLOCK GROUPS CE149US TRACT BLOCK GROUP Appendix D Grantee SF-424s and Action Plan Certifications To be inserted after City Council approval and prior to submission to HUD. PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2019-2020 CDBG ACTION PLAN Pursuant to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations, the City of Temecula has prepared a 2019-2020 Action Plan. The 2019-2020 Action Plan is the City's application to HUD for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds delineating the projects to be undertaken during the program year. The Action Plan identifies the federal and other resources expected to be used to address the priority needs and goals noted in the City's Five -Year Consolidated Plan (2017-2021) adopted by the City in 2017. The City anticipates receiving approximately $546,925 in CDBG funds during 2019-2020. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a copy of these draft documents will be available to the public for review and comment from March 23, 2019, to April 23, 2019, at the City of Temecula Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590, the Ronald H. Roberts Public Library, 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula, California 92592 and online at: http://temeculaca.gov/CDBG NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the Temecula City Council will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, April 23, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. or soon thereafter in the City Council Chamber at Temecula City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. The purpose of the public hearing is as follows: a. To receive public comments, suggestions or other information for consideration prior to approving the 2019-2020 Action Plan. b. To approve the 2019-2020 Action Plan. Interested citizens are invited to submit written comments and/or attend the public hearing to offer comments, suggestions or other information for consideration by the Temecula City Council. Written comments must be submitted at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst, City of Temecula Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. Additional information regarding the City of Temecula's CDBG program may be obtained from Lynn Kelly -Lehner at (951) 506-5172. The City of Temecula is committed to providing reasonable accommodation for persons with special needs and non-English speaking individuals. If you require these accommodations, please call for assistance at (951) 506-5172 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Publish: March 23, 2019 AVISO PUBLICO AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PUBLICA Y PERIODO DE COMENTARIOS PUBLICOS PARA EL PLAN DE DESEMPENO 2019-2020 Conforme a las regulaciones del Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los Estados Unidos (HUD, por sus siglas en ingles), el ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula ha preparado el Plan Desempeno 2019- 2020. El Plan de Desempeno 2019-2020 es la solicitud del Ayuntamiento para HUD para los fondos de Subsidios Globales para el Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG, por sus siglas en ingles), el cual delinea los proyectos que se Ilevaran a cabo durante el programa anual. El Plan de Desempeno identifica los recursos federates y otros recursos que se anticipa ser utilizados para abordar las prioridades de las necesidades y metas mencionadas en el Plan Consolidado de Cinco Anos (2017-2021) del Ayuntamiento adoptado en 2017. El Ayuntamiento anticipa recibir aproximadamente $546,925 en fondos de CDBG durante el periodo 2019-2020. POR MEDIO DE LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que una copia de los borradores de dichos documentos estaran disponibles al publico para su revision y comentarios a partir del 23 de marzo de 2019, al 23 de abril de 2019, en el Departamento de Desarrollo Comunitario del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590; en la Biblioteca Publica Ronald H. Roberts, 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula, California 92592 y en la red de internet en el sitio web: http://temeculaca.gov/CDBG ADEMAS, POR MEDIO DE LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que el Concejo Municipal del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula, Ilevara a cabo una audiencia el martes, 23 de abril de 2019, a las 7:00 p.m. o un poco antes en la Camara del Concejo Municipal del Ayuntamiento ubicado en la Alcaldia de la Ciudad de Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. El proposito de la audiencia publica es por Io siguiente: a. Para recibir comentarios, sugerencias u otra informacion para ser considerados antes de la aprobacion del Plan de Desempeno 2019-2020. b. Para aprobar el Plan de Desempeno 2019-2020. Se les invita a todos los ciudadanos interesados presentar sus comentarios por escrito y/o asistir a la audiencia publica para ofrecer sus comentarios, sugerencias u otra informacion para ser considerados por el Concejo Municipal del Ayuntamiento. Los comentarios por escrito deberan ser presentados por to menos 48 horas antes de la junta a Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Analista de Gerencia Principal, Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula, Departamento de Desarrollo Comunitario, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. Informacion adicional referente al programa de CDBG del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula, puede ser obtenida comunicandose con Lynn Kelly -Lehner al (951) 506-5172. El Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula esta comprometido a proporcionar acomodo especial para las personas con necesidades especiales y para individuos que no hablan el idioma ingles. Si usted requiere alguno de estos acomodos, por favor Ilame para solicitar asistencia al (951) 506-5172 por Io menos 48 horas antes de la junta. Publicado: 23 de marzo de 2019 ITEM NO . 21 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve Update to Existing Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee PREPARED BY: Dale West, Associate Planner II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 15-73, THE "UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE" 2. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 19- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 15.20.020 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THE DEFINITIONS OF COMMERCIAL USES, INDUSTRIAL USES, MINI -STORAGE USES AND PARKING LOT/STRUCTURE AND DELETING THE DEFINITION OF RETAIL USES, AND BY AMENDING SECTION 15.20.030 BY APPLYING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA IN -LIEU FEE AND CREDITS TO THOSE AMENDED USES, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PROJECT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15378(B)(4) BACKGROUND: On November 17, 2015, the City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). On January 12, 2016 the Temecula City Council adopted Ordinance No. 15-14 enacting Chapter 15.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code establishing the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee. On December 8, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-73 setting the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee. SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: The City Council of the City of Temecula proposes to adopt an Ordinance that would: 1) amend Section 15.20.020 of the Temecula Municipal Code by adding the definitions of "commercial uses," "industrial uses," "mini -storage uses" and "parking lot/structure" and deleting the definition of "retail uses," in Section 15.20.020; 2) amend Section 15.20.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code by applying the Uptown Temecula In -Lieu Fee and credit provisions to "commercial uses," "industrial uses," "mini -storage uses" and "parking lot/structure;" in addition to other uses; 3) and finding that the Ordinance does not constitute a project under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because the ordinance involves the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. DISCUSSION: The original New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study prepared in 2015 (the "2015 Nexus Study") analyzed the amount of financial obligation for new streets that can be attributed to the new development of residential, retail, office, and hotel land uses. However, since the adoption of the In -Lieu Fee in 2015, staff has identified certain land uses that were not considered as part of the 2015 Nexus Study. These land uses include: (1) existing grandfathered uses requesting an expansion; and (2) other potential land uses under the Specific Plan that were not originally considered in the original 2015 Nexus Study. The existing grandfathered uses not previously considered that may request an expansion include Industrial Uses, Mini -storage Uses, and Parking Lots/Structures. Additionally, the Retail Uses category has been replaced with the Commercial Uses category to more accurately reflect both retail uses and service commercial uses with the Uptown Temecula planning area. Staff initiated an update to the 2015 New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study to consider the granfathered uses and other potential uses previously discussed. The methodology used by Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) to conduct the Nexus Study update and reach its conclusions are the same as the 2015 Nexus Study, and considered the following: 1. Preliminary cost estimates of new streets; 2. Build -out projections for the Specific Plan by land use type; 3. Comparable land and building sales values in the trade area; 4. Nexus amount of financial obligation for new streets that can be attributed to each land use type; and 5. Economic impact of the New Streets In -Lieu Fee on new development. The 2019 New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update (the "2019 Nexus Study") concluded that the nexus -supported New Streets In -Lieu Fee for residential uses is estimated at $12,001 per unit. For non-residential uses, the in -lieu fee is estimated to range between $0.26 and $19.38 per square foot. These in -lieu fees represent Keyser Marston's conclusion as to the nexus between the need for new streets in the Specific Plan Area and development, and the nexus between the amount of such a fee and benefit to the development. The 2019 Nexus Study also analyzed the economic impact of the fee on new development. The methodology used to analyze the economic impact on new development is the same methodology used for the 2015 Nexus Study. To measure the economic impact of the nexus -supported new streets in -lieu fee on new development, KMA formulated conceptual development cost estimates for residential, office, commercial, and hotel development prototypes. For the purposes of the economic impact analysis, KMA assumed a prototypical half -block development site, and determined that a fee that represents 3% or less of a project's total development cost was a reasonable amount for which a project could incur and remain economically feasible. KMA estimated the economic impact of the nexus -supported in -lieu fee to range between 2.4% and 6.5% of development costs. As a result of applying the 3% threshold, the 2019 Nexus Study concluded that implementing the full fee would potentially inhibit the feasibility of anticipated development in the Specific Plan area. As such, KMA recommends that the City consider an in -lieu fee estimated at one-half of the nexus -supported fee levels and recommend that the following lower fees be adopted: • $6,000 per Residential Unit; • $3.97 per square foot of gross building area for Office Uses; • $9.69 per square foot of gross building area for Commercial Uses; • $5.82 per square foot of gross building area for Hotel Uses; • $2.74 per square foot of gross building area for Industrial Uses; • $1.31 per square foot of gross building area for Mini -Storage Uses; and • $0.13 per square foot of gross building area for Parking Lot/Structure Uses. The economic impact of the recommended fee to the developer is estimated to range from 1.4% and 2.8% of a project's total development cost. The comparison of the 2019 Nexus Study to the 2015 Nexus Study shows a slight decrease in the proposed fees. The following table illustrates this comparison: Uptown Temecula New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Residential Office Commercial Hotel Industrial Mini- Parking Storage Lot/Structure 2015 $6,351/Unit $4.25/SF $9.94/SF $6.23/SF - - - Adopted Fee 2019 Recommended $6,000/unit $3.97/SF $9.69/SF $5.82/SF $2.74/SF $1.31/SF $0.13/SF Fee The City Council conducted a public meeting on March 26, 2019 where staff presented the Nexus Study and to allow the City Council to receive written and oral testimony from the public regarding the Nexus Study and proposed in -lieu fees. There were no comments. FISCAL IMPACT: The recommended In -Lieu Fee represents approximately half of the nexus supported fee amount, which will result in completion of approximately half of the street network of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The funds needed to complete the street network have not been identified at this time nor are any projects currently specified in the Capital Improvement Program Budget. Any infrastructure improvements and appropriation of funds would occur through separate actions and adoption of the Annual Capital Improvements Program Budget by the City Council. Additionally, if sufficient funding is identified to cover the full cost of constructing the street network, the City may consider revoking the fee. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Resolution (New Streets In -Lieu Fee) 2. Draft Ordinance 3. Draft 2019 New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update 4. Notice of Public Hearing RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 15-73, THE "UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Short Title. This Resolution may be referred to as the "Amended Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee Resolution" of the City of Temecula. Section 2. Procedural Findings. A. Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., ("Keyser Marston") prepared the "New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study" for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan ("Specific Plan") dated as of August 2015 ("2015 Nexus Study"). B. On January 12, 2016, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 15-14 adding a new Chapter 15.20, Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee, to the Temecula Municipal Code. On December 8, 2015, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 15-73 approving the methodology set forth in the 2015 Nexus Study and establishing the amount of the in -lieu fees. C. Staff subsequently requested that Keyser Marston update the 2015 Nexus Study to account for existing grandfathered uses requesting an expansion of their use, and other potential land uses that were not considered in the 2015 Nexus Study such as mini -storage, parking lots/structures, and other non -retail commercial uses. In February, 2019, Keyser Marston prepared a "New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update" for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan ("2019 Updated Nexus Study"). D. Government Code Section 66000 et seq. allows local agencies to charge fees for various activities as long as those fees do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of providing the service for which the fee is intended. E. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 66014, 66016 and 66018, the specific fees to be charged for certain regulations, services and products must be adopted by resolution, following notice and public hearing. F. On March 26, 2019, the City Council conducted a public meeting in compliance with Government Code section 66016, at which oral and written testimony could be presented regarding the Nexus Study and in lieu fees. G. At least ten (10) days prior to the public meeting referenced above, the City made available for public inspection information required under Government Code Section 66000, et seq. H. On April 23, 2019, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing, at which time the public was invited to make oral and written presentations as part of the regularly scheduled meeting prior to the adoption of this Resolution. I. The City published notice of the public meeting and public hearing as described above in accordance with Government Code Sections 6062(a), 66014, 66016, 66017 and 66018 for the various in lieu fees. Written notice has been provided to interested parties who fled written requests for mailed notice of meetings on new or increased development -related fees or service charges. Section 3. Findings and Intent. The City Council finds, determines and declares that with respect to the new land use categories identified in Section 5: A. During the visioning process for the Specific Plan, the community identified the importance of improving the future viability of alternative transportation modes, including walking, biking and transit, and getting people out of their cars. The community also identified the need to improve circulation for all modes of transportation, and ensure that the existing street network is expanded and additional internal street connections are made to sustain the future intensification of the area. As a result of this visioning recommendation, the Specific Plan requires smaller blocks and new streets to achieve and implement the future vision: a multi -modal interconnected street network within the Specific Plan area, which improves circulation for vehicles, bicycles, pedestrian and transit. B. In towns prior to World War II, streets were commonly designed to accommodate pedestrians. Street layouts were planned to create smaller blocks, which created compact downtowns. This enabled people to easily walk between stores and shops. The best local example of this is the street grid in Old Town. Temecula's growth accelerated during the 1960's, and new development extended north and south of Old Town. The Specific Plan Area was zoned for commercial uses, and excluded residential uses. In the 1960's and 1970's, streets were optimized for automobiles, and were designed to move as many cars as quickly as possible. This was achieved through the use of wide streets, gentle curves and large blocks. Large blocks resulted in fewer intersections and wide straight streets enabled faster traffic speeds. For pedestrians, this resulted in long walking distances on sidewalks that were next to fast moving traffic. Also, wide streets have longer crosswalks, and require more time for pedestrians to cross. The experience of walking on Jefferson Avenue is perceived by pedestrians as not very safe, comfortable or interesting. C. The future vision for Specific Plan Area is a vibrant, pedestrian -friendly, urban district within the City of Temecula. The goal is to support a mix of uses, including residential. Accordingly, the Specific Plan calls for streets that achieve a better balance between the needs of pedestrians, bicycles, cars and public transit. The creation of smaller blocks in the Specific Plan area is a key strategy to achieve a multi -modal street network. Smaller blocks will provide safe, convenient and walkable routes to neighborhood conveniences, parks, and open spaces. Smaller blocks will also support the mobility of those that live, work and play in the Specific Plan Area and help create a destination for those visiting the area. D. The following objectives in the Specific Plan summarize how the Street, Block and Alley Design Guidelines of the Specific Plan will achieve improved multi -modal mobility, increased circulation, and better connectivity within the Specific Plan area. 1. Expand upon the existing street network to promote a walkable, pedestrian friendly urban environment by adding new streets, blocks and alleys to the current circulation network. 2. Retrofit existing streets to accommodate safe, innovative and comfortable pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 3. Implement new east/west linkages within the Specific Plan area, across Interstate-15, and across Murrieta Creek. 4. Encourage pedestrian access and connectivity to the future creek trail and planned park/recreation amenity planned on the north end of the Specific Plan area. 5. Implement additional north/south linkages for vehicles, pedestrian, cyclists and transit, to connect the Specific Plan area to Old Town to the south, and Murrieta to the north. 6. Encourage the development of more logical block shapes, grid patterns, and smaller block sizes, to increase walkability and allow for enhanced way -finding. 7. Encourage greater intersection density by incentivizing the construction of additional streets and smaller blocks as properties redevelop. 8. Create new street frontage and visibility for isolated, landlocked parcels by adding new streets, blocks and alleys to the existing circulation network. E. It is the intent of the City to require every person who develops land within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area to mitigate the impacts of that development by constructing or paying the In -Lieu Fee for the new streets required by that development as provided in the Specific Plan. F. Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) utilized the following methodology in conducting the 2019 Nexus Study and reaching its conclusions: 1. Reviewed the proposed new street system in terms of physical features and preliminary cost estimates and determined that no changes have occurred since 2015 when the Nexus Study was performed. 2. Reviewed updated build -out projections for the Specific Plan by land use type, i.e., dwelling units, office space, commercial space, and hotel rooms. 3. Reviewed comparable land and building sales values in the Temecula Valley. 4. Estimated the nexus amount of financial obligation for new streets that can be attributed to each land use type. G. The 2019 Nexus Study concluded that the nexus -supported new streets in -lieu fee for residential uses is estimated at $12,001 per unit. The 2019 Nexus Study concluded that the nexus -supported new streets in -lieu fee for non-residential uses is estimated to range between $0.26 and $19.38 per square foot, depending on land use type. These in -lieu fees represent Keyser Marston's conclusion as to the nexus between the need for new streets in the Specific Plan area and development and the nexus between the amount of such a fee and benefit to the development. H. the 2019 Nexus Study also concluded that implementing the full fee would potentially inhibit the feasibility of anticipated development in the Specific Plan area. As such, KMA recommends that the City consider an in -lieu fee estimated at one-half of the nexus - supported fee levels. I. There is a reasonable relationship between the streets to be paid for by the In -Lieu Fees, the amount of such fees, and the need for streets generated by the types of development projects within the Specific Plan on which they are imposed. Developers are paying their fair share of the costs of the new streets. Section 4. Changes for Certain Categories of In -Lieu Fees. Pursuant to the provisions set forth in Chapter 15.20, including without limitation, Section 15.20.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the City Council hereby amends Section 3 of Resolution No. 15-73 to decrease the in lieu fees for the following categories of land uses: A. Residential Unit fees will decrease from $6,351 to $6,000 per unit; B. Office Uses will decrease from $4.25 to $3.97 per square foot of gross building area; and C. Hotel Uses will decrease from $6.23 to $5.82 per square foot of gross building area. Section 5. Deletion of Certain Categories of In Lieu Fees. The City Council also hereby amends Section 3 of Resolution No. 15-73 to eliminate the in lieu fee land use category for Retail Uses. Section 6. New In Lieu Fee Land Use Categories. Pursuant to the provisions set forth in Chapter 15.20, including without limitation, Section 15.20.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the City Council hereby establishes and imposes the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Street In -Lieu Fee within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area for the following categories of land uses in the amounts of - A. $9.69 per square foot of gross building area for Commercial Uses; B. $2.74 per square foot of gross building area for Industrial Uses; C. $1.31 per square foot of gross building area for Mini -Storage Uses; and D. $0.13 per square foot for parking lots and parking structures. Section 7. Amendments. Resolution No. 15-73 is in full force and effect, except as otherwise amended herein. In the event of any discrepancy between Resolution No. 15-73 and this Resolution, this Resolution will govern. Section 8. CEQA. The approval of the User Fees established in this Resolution does not constitute a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because such actions involve the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Section 9. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall affect the other provisions of this Resolution which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or its application, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are severable. Section 10. Effective Date. The reduction of fees for residential, office and hotel uses set forth in Section 4 of this Resolution shall become effective immediately. The in lieu fees established in Section 6 of this Resolution for commercial, industrial and mini -storage uses, and for parking lots and parking structures shall be effective sixty (60) days following the adoption of Ordinance No. 19-04. All other provisions of this Resolution shall take effect immediately. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of April, 2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 19- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 19- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 15.20.020 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THE DEFINITIONS OF COMMERCIAL USES, INDUSTRIAL USES, MINI -STORAGE USES AND PARKING LOT/STRUCTURE AND DELETING THE DEFINITION OF RETAIL USES, AND BY AMENDING SECTION 15.20.030 BY APPLYING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA IN -LIEU FEE AND CREDITS TO THOSE AMENDED USES, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A PROJECT UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15378(B)(4) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Keyser Marston Associates prepared an update to the 2015 New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study for Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, dated February, 2019 (the "Fee Study"), that analyzes the impact of development within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area on the need for certain street improvements and calculated the in -lieu fee based on that analysis. B. The period of greater than ten (10) days prior to adoption of this ordinance, data has been available to the public, and to developers and their representative, indicating the cost of estimated cost of the streets to be funded, the revenue sources anticipated and means of spending these costs. C. On March 26, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed open and public meeting, at which it considered the proposed amendment to Chapter 15.20, Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee, of the Temecula Municipal Code (Chapter 15.20) and the adoption of the in -lieu fee for streets within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area ("In -Lieu Fee"). The Fee Study, which contains data indicating the estimated cost, required to provide the streets for which the In -Lieu Fee would be levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the service, was made available to the public at least ten days prior to the date of this City Council meeting. D. On April 23, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing regarding the proposed amendment to Chapter 15.20 and the adoption of the In -Lieu Fee. The City Council considered all staff reports, public testimony, and other evidence received at the public hearing prior to adopting this ordinance. E. On November 17, 2015 the Council adopted Resolution No. 15-65 certifying the Environmental Impact Report for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and adopting the Mitigation and Monitoring Program ("EIR"). The EIR analyzed the environmental impacts of the streets proposed by the Specific Plan which streets were proposed to be funded by the In -Lieu Fee. The City staff has evaluated the potential environmental impacts of the adoption of this specific Ordinance, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). City staff has determined that these actions do not constitute a "project" under CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because these actions involve the creation of a government funding mechanism for public improvements that have been fully analyzed under the EIR. In addition, City Staff has determined that these actions are categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA guidelines Section 15273(a)(4) because these actions and documents are merely establishing an in -fee to obtain funds for public improvements that have been fully analyzed by the EIR. F. All prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance as specified by the Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code Section 66000 et seq.) and other applicable laws have been satisfied. Section 2. Section 15.20.020, Definitions, of Chapter 15.20, Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee, of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended by deleting the definition for "Retail Uses" and adding definitions for "Commercial", "Industrial", "Mini -storage" and "Parking Lot/Structure" in alphabetical order as follows: "Commercial Uses" shall include those uses as specified in Chapter 3 of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. "Industrial Uses" shall have the same meaning as "Light Manufacturing" as specified in Chapter 3 of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, as well as the existing legal - non conforming industrial uses within the Uptown Temecula planning area. "Mini -storage Uses" shall have the same meaning as "Mini -warehouse" as specified in the Temecula Municipal Code. "Parking Lot/Structure" means a parcel used as a parking lot or parking structure where parking spaces are metered and fee is charged based on duration of stay." Section 3. Subsections C and E of Section 15.20.030, In -Lieu Fees and In -Lieu Credits, of Chapter 15.20, Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee, of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "C. Every person who develops a Commercial Use, Hotel Use, Industrial Use, Mini - storage Use, Office Use, Parking Lot/Structure, or Residential Use or a combination thereof„ in the Specific Plan area after the effective date of the ordinance adopting this chapter shall pay to the city the in -lieu fee pursuant to this chapter. "E. In the event that a developer develops a Commercial Use, Hotel Use, Industrial Use, Mini -storage Use, Office Use, Parking Lot/Structure, or Residential Use or a combination thereof, and constructs the Streets required for such uses by the land use approval, the developer shall be entitled to a credit on In -Lieu Fees applicable to its development in the amount of the actual costs for the design, design, right of way and construction of the streets within the time called for in the project's land use entitlements. City shall enter into an improvement agreement with developer that will guarantee completion of the design, right of way and construction of such streets within a specified period of time, provide for the estimate of such work and appropriate securities based thereon and such other matters as the City Manager deems necessary to implement the street work required for the development. City Manager shall be authorized to enter into such agreements on behalf of the City." Section 4. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. Section 5. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , 2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 19- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 2019, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update JIIM�'Nh *r� V .' k�k'?t ° rt'4��+ t •_,.� r. 1..y'LI 004. 1 i . �� ��f: ,� �� �`'•h ��G; r'�:. 17 3�e-Ao Ij f fin Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Temecula, CA New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Temecula, California Prepared for: City of Temecula February 2019 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 555 West Beech St., Suite 460 San Diego, California 92101 500 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1480 Los Angeles, California 90071 2040 Bancroft Avenue, Suite 302 Berkeley, California 94704 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Key Findings................................................................. 3 III. Estimated Development Budget for Planned New Streets............................................................... 5 IV. Nexus -Supported Fee Amounts........................................................................................................ 7 V. Recommended Fee Levels............................................................................................................... 18 VI. Limiting Conditions..........................................................................................................................19 Appendices Appendix A: New Streets Costs........................................................................................................... 20 Appendix B: New Streets In -Lieu Fee Analysis M11:11, KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES- 22 I. INTRODUCTION A. Obiective In accordance with our agreement with the City of Temecula, Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA) has prepared a nexus analysis in support of an update to the City of Temecula's (City) new streets in -lieu fee for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. As background, the City adopted a Specific Plan for the Uptown Temecula area (Specific Plan) in November 2015. The Specific Plan allows for increased densities, multi -family residential, and mixed - use development in the 560-net acre area. Concurrently, the City identified a preliminary list of new and upgraded public improvements, facilities, and other amenities required to support this new development. In particular, the Specific Plan calls for development of a new circulation system in the form of large city blocks measuring approximately 450 feet by 450 feet, for a total block size of 4.6 acres. The City intends to require developers to dedicate right-of-way and construct the new street improvements adjacent to, or through, their development sites. Developers within the Specific Plan area who cannot contribute right-of-way and/or build new streets due to location, phasing, or other factors would be charged a new streets in -lieu fee. In August 2015, KMA completed the New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study (Nexus Study) for the Specific Plan. The Nexus Study concluded the nexus supported in -lieu fees for residential at $12,701 per unit, and between $8.50 per square foot (SF) and $19.87 SF for non-residential uses. On December 8, 2015, the City adopted a fee schedule reflecting one-half of the nexus -supported fee amounts determined by KMA, as follows: Residential $6,351/Unit Office $4.25/SF Retail $9.94/S F Hotel $6.23/SF The City requested that KMA update the Nexus Study to include: (1) existing grandfathered uses requesting an expansion; and (2) other potential land uses under the Specific Plan that were not originally considered in the August 2015 Nexus Study. Existing grandfathered uses that may request an expansion include industrial and mini -storage, among others. Other potential land uses under the Specific Plan include parking lots/structures and other non -retail commercial uses. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 1 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 B. Methodology In completing the updated nexus analysis, KMA performed the following key work tasks: 1. Reviewed the proposed new street system in terms of physical features and preliminary cost estimates (no changes have occurred since 2015). 2. Reviewed updated build -out projections for the Specific Plan by land use type. 3. Reviewed comparable land and building sales values in the Temecula Valley. 4. Estimated the nexus amount of financial obligation for new streets that can be attributed to each land use type. C. Report Organization This nexus analysis has been organized as follows: • Following this Introduction, Section 11 presents the KMA key findings. • Section 111 presents the development budget for the new streets planned for the Specific Plan area. • The KMA estimates of the nexus -supported new streets in -lieu fee amounts are detailed in Section 1 V. • Section V presents the updated recommendations for new streets in -lieu fee levels by land use type. • Limiting conditions pertaining to this nexus analysis are presented in Section A City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 2 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 II. KEY FINDINGS A. Nexus -Supported Fee Amount As summarized in Table 1-1, the nexus -supported new streets in -lieu fee for residential uses is estimated at $12,001 per unit. Expressed on a per -SF and per -acre basis, the in -lieu for residential uses is estimated at $10.62 per SF gross building area and $300,016 per acre. The nexus -supported in -lieu fee for non-residential uses is estimated to range between $0.26 and $19.38 per SF, depending on land use type. Nexus-SupportedTable 11-1: Parking Residential Office Commercial Hotel Industrial Mini -Storage Lot/Structure $12,001/Unit $10.62/SF (1) $7.94/SF $19.38/SF $11.63/SF $5.48/SF $2.63/SF $0.26/SF $300,016/Acre (2) (1) Assumes an average gross unit size of 1,130 SF. (2) Based on a density factor of 25 dwelling units per acre (the recommended minimum density within all districts of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) on a residential land area of 149 acres. B. Recommended Fee KMA recommends an in -lieu fee estimated at $6,000 per unit for residential development. On a per -SF and per -acre basis, the recommended residential in -lieu fee is estimated at $5.31 per SF gross building area and $150,008 per acre. For non-residential development, the KMA recommended fee is estimated to range between $0.13 and $9.69 per SF of building area. As shown in Table II-2, the recommended fee reflects one-half of the nexus -supported fee amount determined by KMA. Table 11-2: Recommended New Streets In -Lieu Fee Residential Office Commercial Hotel Industrial Mini -Storage Parking Lot/Structure $ 6, 000/Unit $5.31/SF (1) $3.97/SF $9.69/SF $5.82/SF $2.74/SF $1.31/SF $0.13/SF $150,008/Acre (2) (1) Assumes an average gross unit size of 1,130 SF. (2) Based on a density factor of 25 dwelling units per acre (the recommended minimum density within all districts of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) on a residential land area of 149 acres. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 3 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 C. Fee Level Adiustment As designated in Resolution No. 15-73, the fee will be adjusted each year by the Director of Finance on July 1. The annual adjustment will be based upon the Construction Cost Index of the Engineering News Record Index (ENRI). City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 4 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 III. ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT BUDGET FOR PLANNED NEW STREETS This section presents the new street improvements planned for the Specific Plan area and their estimated development budget. The detailed KMA technical analysis is provided in Appendix A and summarized below. A. Planned New Streets Exhibit III-1 presents the new streets planned for the Specific Plan area. As shown, the City's Public Works department has identified a network of 24 street segments totaling 23,070 linear feet. In addition to the new streets, improvements planned for each new street segment include new sidewalks, medians, landscaping, utilities, signage, and lighting. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 5 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 B. Development Budget As shown in Table III-1, the development budget for the new street segments and street improvements is estimated at $34,266,000. Acquisition costs for the public right-of-way is estimated to total $30,452,000 or $20 per SF of land area (1,522,620 SF). Based on the above, the total development budget for the new streets planned in the Specific Plan area is estimated at $64,718,000. Table 111-1: New Streets Development .• Direct Costs (11 New public streets, storm drain, water, $27,413,000 sewer, and contingency Indirect Costs(2) Design, engineering, and other studies $4,112,000 Financing Costs1�1 Issuance fees, third party costs, and $2,741,000 interest reserve Total Costs without Land Acquisition $34,266,000 Acquisition Costs(2) Acquisition costs for public right-of-way $30,452,000 Total New Streets Costs $64,718,000 (1) Source: City of Temecula, June 12, 2015. (2) KMA estimate based on review of comparable land and building sales in the Temecula Valley. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 6 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 IV. NEXUS -SUPPORTED FEE AMOUNTS This section presents the KMA methodology used to estimate the nexus -supported fee amounts for new streets planned for the Specific Plan area. The detailed KMA technical analysis is provided in Appendix B and summarized below. A. Projected New Development Table IV-1 presents the City's proposed land use categories subject to the new streets in -lieu fee. Residential Development Office Commercial Industrial Building or portion thereof used for permanent human habitation Medical, dental, financial, real estate, legal, and other professional offices Businesses selling goods, wares, or merchandise, and services directly to the customer • Residential • Transitional housing • Office (administrative, professional, medical, and financial) • Alcohol and beverage sales • Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility • Art studio • Auditorium, community assembly space • Auto maintenance/light repair • Auto sales • Auto service station/gas station • Bar, cocktail lounge, night club • Car wash • Community care facility • Daycare/pre-school • Educational facilities —for profit • Facilities for mentally disordered, disabled, or neglected children • Farmer's market • Grocery store • Health, fitness, martial arts, and dance studio • Hospital • Kennel/pet day care • Performing arts venues, theatre, cinemas • Private smoking lounge/ hookah lounge • Residential care facilities • Residential care facilities for elderly • Restaurant • Retail • Service — general • Service — personal • Sports and recreation facility • Swap meet • Wine/micro-brewery tasting facility (1) Manufacturing, wholesale, Light manufacturing orage distribution, and st• Wine/micro-brewery tasting facility (2) City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 7 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 ProposedTable IV-1: Hotel and Tourist and visitor -oriented • Hotel Lodging Facility lodging facilities Mini -Storage Storage facility • Mini -storage facility Parking Lot/ Parcel used as parking lot or • Parking lot / stand-alone parking structure Structure parking structure where parking spaces are metered and fee is charged based on duration of stay Exemptions Possible exemptions from • Government facilities fee • Affordable housing (housing for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households) • Nonprofit offering full time daycare at the elementary or high school level • Public schools • Sanctuary building of church eligible for property tax exemption (1) Excludes manufacturing area of wine/micro-brewery. (2) Excludes tasting area of wine/micro-brewery. Table IV-2 presents an overview of the new development and expansion of existing uses anticipated for the Specific Plan area. The expansion of existing land uses and new development will result in the creation of new dwelling units, office space, commercial space, hotel rooms, etc. As shown, total new development subject to the in -lieu fee is projected to include 3,726 dwelling units and 1,929,921 SF of non-residential development. Development,Table IV-2: Projected Residential and Non -Residential .. Expansion of New Existing Land Uses Development Total New Development Subject to the In -Lieu Fee Residential Development Single -Family 0 Units 0 Units 0 Units Multi -Family —Own 0 Units 1,863 Units 1,863 Units Multi -Family— Rent 0 Units 1,863 Units 1,863 Units Total Residential Development ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 0 Units 3,726 Units _................................................................................._.............. 3,726 Units Non -Residential Development 59,118 SF 1,149,417 SF 1,208,535 SF Office Commercial 73,116 SF 304,888 SF 378,004 SF City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 8 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 IV-2: Projected Residential and Development,Table Non -Residential Expansion of Total New Development New Development ExistingLand Uses Subject to the In -Lieu Fee Hotel 0 Rooms 315 Rooms 315 Rooms Average Gross Room Size 0 SF 800 SF 800 SF Total Hotel Building Area 0 SF 252,000 SF 252,000 SF Industrial 19,402 SF 0 SF 19,402 SF Mini -Storage 11,750 SF 0 SF 11,750 SF Parking Lot/Structure 0 SF 60,230 SF 60,230 SF Total Non -Residential Development 163,387 SF 1,766,535 SF 1,929,921 SF (1) KMA assumption. B. Projected Total Residents, Employees, and Visitors Table IV-3 translates total new development into the total number of residents, employees, and visitors (hotel guests and commercial patrons). As shown below, the number of new residents, employees, and visitors in the Specific Plan area can be estimated based on assumptions regarding building efficiency and occupancy for each building type, as well as industry standard population and employment density factors for residential and non-residential land uses. The residential population is calculated assuming typical household sizes found in multi -family and mixed -use developments. Total employees and visitors are estimated using typical employment density and visitor traffic factors for office, hotel, commercial, and other uses. Based on these assumptions, KMA estimates that the Specific Plan at build - out will accommodate 6,195 residents, 5,501 employees, and 1,952 "full time equivalent" visitors on a daily basis. IV-3: Total New Residents, Employees,Table New Building Building Density Development Efficiency Occupancy Factor Total Residents Multi -Family - Own 1,863 Units ---- 95% 2.0/Unit 3,540 Residents Multi -Family — Rent 1,863 Units ---- 95% 1.5/Unit 2,655 Residents Total Residents 3,726 Units ---- 6,195 Residents ................................................................................ Employees .......................................... _ _ ................................................ ............................................... Residential 3,726 Units ---- ---- 0.025/Unit 93 Employees Office 1,208,535 SF 95% 90% 4.0/1,000 SF 4,133 Employees City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 9 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc 19014kal 19545.042.001 IV-3: Total New Residents, Employees,Table New Development Building Efficiency Building Occupancy Density Factor Total Commercial 378,004 SF 95% 90% 3.0/1,000 SF 970 Employees Hotel 315 Rooms ---- ---- 0.80/Room 252 Employees Industrial 19,402 SF 95% 90% 2.5/1,000 SF 41 Employees Mini -Storage 11,750 SF ---- ---- 0.50/1,000 SF 6 Employees Parking Lot/Structure 60,230 SF ---- ---- 0.10/1,000 SF 6 Employees Total Employees ......................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................._............................................. _ 5,501 Employees ____________ ............................ Visitors Commercial 378,004 SF 95% 90% 5.0/1,000 SF 1,616 Visitors Hotel 315 Rooms ---- 70% 1.5/Room 331 Visitors Mini -Storage 11,750 SF 95% 90% 0.50/1,000 SF 5 Visitors Total Visitors 1,952 Visitors C. Resident Equivalents KMA estimated the impact of one employee and one visitor expressed as a percent of one resident by calculating the number of "Resident Equivalents". The Resident Equivalent calculation considers the amount of time that residents, employees, and visitors have available each day to use the new streets and street improvements, such as traffic lanes, bike lanes, parking, sidewalks, landscaping, and lighting. Step 1: Estimate of Net Residents, Employees, and Visitors As shown in Table IV-4, the first step used to estimate Resident Equivalents is to correct for the overlap of Specific Plan employees and visitors who will also reside in the Specific Plan area. KMA assumed between 5% and 15% of the Specific Plan area's employees, and 20% of the Specific Plan area's commercial and mini -storage visitors (customers), will also reside in the Specific Plan area. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 10 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 Employees,Table IV-4: Estimate of Net Residents, (Less) Number of Total Number Employees/Visitors Net Residents/ of Residents, Residing in Employees/ Employees, and Specific Plan Area Visitors in Visitors Specific Plan Area % Total Residents Working Residents Outside Specific Plan area 4,529 ---- 0 4,529 Inside Specific Plan area 737 ---- 0 737 Total Working Residents 5,266 111 5,266 Non -Working Residents 929 111 - - 0 929 Total Residents ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................._........... 6,195 - - 0 6,195 Employees Residential 93 5% (5) 88 Office 4,133 15% (620) 3,513 Commercial 970 10% (97) 873 Hotel 252 5% (13) 239 Industrial 41 5% (2) 39 Mini -Storage 6 5% 0 6 Parking Lots/Structures 6 5% 0 6 Total Employees .......................................................... ......... 5,501 ......... ......... ......... (737) ....................................... ._........................................................_........... 4,764 Visitors Commercial 1,616 20%(2) (323) 1,293 Hotel 331 ---- 0 331 Mini -Storage 5 20%(2) (1) 4 Total Visitors 1,952 (324) 1,628 (1) KMA estimate, based on review of the portion of working and non -working residents in the City age 16+ in Labor Force. (2) Assumes 20% of commercial and mini -storage customers reside, are employed, or are hotel guests in the Specific Plan area. Step 2: Estimate of "Available Time" The second step is to estimate the minimum amount of "available time" that residents, employees, and visitors will spend in the Specific Plan area. For residents, "available time" means the amount of time spent at home or in the neighborhood each day; for employees within the Specific Plan area, it reflects the minimum amount of time that employees spend at work and the surrounding district each day; and City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 11 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 for visitors, this means the amount of time that visitors will spend patronizing businesses or other amenities within the Specific Plan area. The "available time" assumptions are not based on a specific study or survey, but rather represent reasonable estimates. The purpose of these estimates is to distinguish working residents from non- working residents, and residents from employees and visitors. As shown in Table IV-5, the following "available time" assumptions are incorporated into the analysis: • Residents working outside the Specific Plan area are assumed to have "available time" of 14 hours per weekday and 24 hours per weekend day in the Specific Plan area. In other words, they are assumed to spend 10 hours per weekday outside the Specific Plan area for work. • Residents working inside the Specific Plan area and non -working residents are assumed to have "available time" of 24 hours per day every day in the Specific Plan area. • Employees are assumed to spend 10 hours per weekday in the Specific Plan area, reflecting a typical work shift and lunch hour. • On a "full-time equivalent" basis, commercial visitors are assumed to spend 10 hours per weekday and 10 hours per weekend day in the Specific Plan area. In other words, the average commercial business is assumed to open 10 hours per day, with average patronage of five (5) customers per 1,000 SF at any given time. These estimates reflect the likely high proportion of eating and drinking establishments among the new commercial uses. • On a "full-time equivalent" basis, mini -storage visitors are assumed to spend 10 hours per weekday and 10 hours per weekend day in the Specific Plan area. In other words, the average mini -storage business is assumed to open 10 hours per day, with average patronage of 0.50 customers per 1,000 SF at any given time. • Hotel visitors are assumed to spend 75% of their time in the Specific Plan area, reflecting their overnight lodging in the area, as well as a certain percentage of each day spent in the area. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 12 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 Table IV-S: Estimate of Resident Equivalents Estimate of Hours in Specific Plan Area % of "Available Time" Weekday Weekend Total Weekly in Specific Plan Hours Hours Hours Area Residents Working Residents Outside Specific Plan area 70 48 118 70% Inside Specific Plan area 120 48 168 100% Total Working Residents 74% Non -Working Residents 120 48 168 100% ...................................................................................... _ _ _ Employees 50 ............................. 0 ......... 50 ................. 30% ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... Visitors ................... ........................ Commercial 50 20 70 42% Hotel 90 36 126 75% Mini -Storage 50 20 70 42% Total Visitors 48% Step 3: Total Resident Equivalents The third step is to calculate the total number of Resident Equivalents. As presented in Table IV-6, by multiplying the net number of residents, employees, and visitors (see Table IV-4) by the percentage of time spent in the Specific Plan area (see Table IV-5), KMA estimated a total of 7,054 Resident Equivalents in the Specific Plan area at build -out. Table IV-6: Estimate of Resident Equivalents Total Number of of Time in Specific Total Resident Residents, Employees, Plan Area Equivalents and Visitors Residents Working Residents 5,266 74% 3,918 Non -Working 929 100% 929 Total Residents .................................................................................................................................. 6,195 ............................................................................ 77% ........................................................................... 4,847 Employees 4,764 (1) 30% 1,418 .................................................. Visitors ......... ......... ......... 1,628 (1) ......... ......... ......... ........ 48% ......... 789 Total Resident Equivalents 7,054 (1) Reflects employees/visitors not residing in Specific Plan area. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 13 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc 19014kal 19545.042.001 D. Dwelling Unit Equivalency To determine the number of Resident Equivalents per residential unit and per non-residential SF, KMA translated Resident Equivalents to Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs). The number of EDUs is calculated by dividing the number of Resident Equivalents for each land use (see Table IV-6), by the number of dwelling units or 1,000 SF of building area. As shown in Table IV-7, the number of Equivalent Residents for each land use type is estimated at 1.31 per residential unit and between 0.03 and 1.43 per 1,000 SF non-residential development, depending on land use type. Table IV-7: Equivalent Residents per Unit Resident Equivalents Number of Units/SF Equivalent Residents per Unit/per 1,000 SF Residential Residents 4,847 3,726 Units 1.30 Employees 26 3,726 Units 0.01 Total Residential ........ ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... 4,873 .... ......... ......... ......... 1.31 ......... Office Employees ...................................... 1,046 ................... 1,208,535 SF ......... ............................................................................... 0.87 Commercial Employees 260 378,004 SF 0.69 Visitors 539 378,004 SF 1.43 Total Commercial ..................................................................................................... ... 798 ............................................... _ ....................................... 2.12 _........................................... Hotel Employees 71 252,000 SF 0.28 Visitors 248 252,000 SF 0.99 Total Hotel ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 320 1.27 Industrial Employees ......... 12 .................................... .................................................................... 19,402 SF 0.60 ......... Mini -Storage Employees 2 11,750 SF 0.14 Visitors 2 11,750 SF 0.14 Total Mini -Storage .................................................................. 4 0.28 Parking Lot/Structure Employees 2 60,230 SF 0.03 City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 14 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 The next step was to estimate the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor for each non-residential land use type. As shown in Table IV-8, the EDU factor is calculated by dividing the number of Equivalent Residents per 1,000 SF by the number of Equivalent Residents per unit (1.31). Table IV-8: EDU Factors by Land Use Type Equivalent Residents Equivalent Residents per per Dwelling Unit EDU Factor Unit/1,000 SF Residential 1.31 1.31 1.00 Office 0.87 1.31 0.66 Commercial 2.12 1.31 1.62 Hotel 1.27 1.31 0.97 Industrial 0.60 1.31 I 0.46 Mini -Storage 0.28 1.31 0.22 Parking Lot/Structure 0.03 1.31 0.02 In sum, 1,000 SF of office development is estimated to have the same impact on new streets as 0.66 dwelling units; 1,000 SF of commercial has the same impact as 1.62 dwelling units; 1,000 SF of hotel development has the same impact as 0.97 dwelling units; 1,000 SF industrial has the same impact of 0.46 dwelling units; 1,000 SF of mini -storage has the same impact as 0.22 dwelling units; and 1,000 SF of parking lots/structures has the same impact as 0.02 dwelling units. E. Estimated Nexus -Supported New Streets In -Lieu Fee Amounts The final steps used to calculate the nexus supported new streets in -lieu fee amounts start with the estimate of the total number of EDUs in the Specific Plan area at build -out. As shown in Table IV-9, the EDU factors determined in the previous section applied against the number of residential units and non- residential SF are estimated to yield a total of 5,393 EDUs. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 15 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 IV-9: Total EDUs in Specific Plan Area at Build-outTable Mini- Parking Lot/ Residential Office Commercial Hotel Industrial Storage Structure Number of 3,726 Units 1,208,535 SF 378,004 SF 252,000 SF 19,402 SF 11,750 SF 60,230 Units/SF Total EDU 1.00 0.66 1.62 0.97 0.46 0.22 0.02 Factor Total EDUs 3,726 799,383 610,490 244,276 8,863 2,571 1,297 Total EDUs per unit/per 3,726 799 610 244 9 3 1 1,000 SF Total EDUs in the Specific Plan Area at Build -out 5,393 The next step was to determine the new streets in -lieu fee per EDU. To determine the new streets in - lieu fee per EDU, the estimated total new streets budget of $64,718,000 (described above in Section III) is divided by the total number of EDUs at build -out (5,095). As shown in Table IV-10, this results in a nexus -supported new streets in -lieu fee per EDU of $12,001. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 16 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 The last step was to determine the nexus -supported in -lieu fee on a per -unit and per -SF basis. The nexus -supported in -lieu fee expressed on a per -unit and per -SF basis is calculated by multiplying the in - lieu fee per EDU ($12,001) by the total EDU factor for each land use type. As shown in Table IV-11, this yields a nexus -supported new streets in -lieu fee of $12,001 per residential unit and between $0.26 and $19.38 per non-residential SF, depending on land use type. IV-11: Nexus-SupportedTable Mini- Parking Lot/ Residential Office Commercial Hotel Industrial Storage Structure Total In -Lieu $12,001 $12,001 $12,001 $12,001 $12,001 $12,001 $12,001 Fee per EDU EDU Factor 1.00 0.66 1.62 0.97 0.46 0.22 0.02 Supported $12,001/Unit $7.94/SF $19.38/SF $11.63/SF $5.48/SF $2.63/SF $0.26/SF In -Lieu Fee City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 17 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 V. RECOMMENDED FEE A. Economic Impact of New Streets In -Lieu Fee To measure the economic impact of the nexus -supported new streets in -lieu fee on new development, KMA formulated conceptual development cost estimates for residential, office, commercial, and hotel development prototypes. For the purposes of the economic impact analysis, KMA assumed a prototypical half -block development site. Based on the development cost estimates noted in Table V-1, KMA estimated the economic impact of the nexus -supported in -lieu fee to range between 2.4% and 6.5% of development costs. EconomicTable V-1: ..Supported Residential Office Commercial Hotel Development Costs $300,000/Unit $325/SF $300/SF $350/SF Supported Fee $12,001/Unit $7.94/SF $19.38/SF $11.63/SF Fee as % of Costs 4.0% 2.4% 6.5% 3.3% B. Recommended New Streets In -Lieu Fee Levels It is the KMA view that a fee in excess of 3.0% of development costs may potentially inhibit the feasibility of anticipated development in the Specific Plan area. As such, KMA recommends that the City consider an in -lieu fee estimated at one-half of the nexus -supported fee levels, as presented in Table V- 2. Table V-2: Recommended New Streets In -Lieu Fee Residential Office Commercial Hotel Industrial Mini -Storage Parking Lot/Structure $ 6, 000/Unit $5.31/SF (1) $3.97/SF $9.69/SF $5.82/SF $2.74/SF $1.31/SF $0.13/SF $150,008/Acre (2) (1) Assumes an average unit size of 1,130 SF. (2) Based on a density factor of 25 dwelling units per acre (the recommended minimum density within all districts of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) on a residential land area of 149 acres. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 18 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 VI. LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. KMA has made extensive efforts to confirm the accuracy and timeliness of the information contained in this analysis. Such information was compiled from a variety of sources deemed to be reliable including state and local government, planning agencies, real estate brokers, and other third parties. Although KMA believes all information in this analysis is correct, it does not guarantee the accuracy of such and assumes no responsibility for inaccuracies in the information provided by third parties. 2. The findings are based on economic rather than political considerations. Therefore, they should be construed neither as a representation nor opinion that government approvals for development can be secured. 3. The analysis, opinions, recommendations, and conclusions of this analysis are KMA's informed judgment based on market and economic conditions as of the date of this report. Due to the volatility of market conditions and complex dynamics influencing the economic conditions of the building and development industry, conclusions and recommended actions contained herein should not be relied upon as sole input for final business decisions regarding current and future development and planning. 4. The analysis assumes that neither the local nor national economy will experience a major recession. If an unforeseen change occurs in the economy, the conclusions contained herein may no longer be valid. City of Temecula — New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Page 19 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. 19014kal 19545.042.001 APPENDIX A NEW STREETS COSTS New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Uptown Temecula Specific Plan City of Temecula Page 20 TABLE A-1 TOTAL NEW STREETS COSTS NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEXUS STUDY UPDATE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA Gross Building Area - Specific Plan Residential 4,210,380 SF Office 1,149,417 SF Retail 0 SF Hotel 252,000 SF Total GBA 5,611,797 SF New Streets Assumptions. Land Area 1,522,620 SF Linear Feet 23,070 LF Total Per SF GBA Comments I. Direct Costs New Public Street $14,951,000 $2.66 $648 per Linear Foot Storm Drain $4,885,000 $0.87 $212 per Linear Foot Water $1,555,000 $0.28 $67 per Linear Foot Sewer $1,453,000 $0.26 $63 per Linear Foot Contingency $4,569,000 $0.81 20% of Above Directs Total Direct Costs $27,413,000 $4.88 $1,188 per Linear Foot II. Indirect Costs (1) $4,112,000 $0.73 15% of Directs III. Financing Costs (2) $2,741,000 $0.49 10% of Directs IV. Total New Street Costs without Land $34,266,000 $6.11 $1,485 per Linear Foot V. Acquisition Costs $30,452,000 $5.43 $20 per SF of Land Area (3; VI. Total New Street Costs $64,718,000 $11.53 $2,805 per Linear Foot (1) KMA assumption; includes design, engineering, and other studies. (2) KMA assumption; includes issuance fees, third party costs, and interest reserve. (3) KMA assumption. Source: City of Temecula, June 12, 2015, except as noted. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename is\Temecula_Jefferson New Streets Update_v5;2/25/2019;lag Page 21 APPENDIX B NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEXUS ANALYSIS New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Uptown Temecula Specific Plan City of Temecula Page 22 TABLE B-1 ESTIMATE OF RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEXUS STUDY UPDATE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA Expansion of Existing Uses I. Residential Development A. Single -Family B. Multi -Family - Own @ Average Gross Unit Size Total GBA C. Multi -Family- Rent @ Average Gross Unit Size Total GBA D. Number of Dwelling Units Average Gross Unit Size Total GBA II. Non -Residential Development A. Office (SF) 59,118 SF B. Commercial 73,116 SF C. Hotel Rooms 0 Rooms Average Gross Room Size (SF) @ (1) 0 SF Total Hotel GBA 0 SF D. Industrial (SF) 19,402 SF E. Mini -Storage 11,750 SF F. Parking Lots/Structures - SF G. Total Non -Residential GBA 163,387 SF (1) KMA assumption. Source: CityofTemecula Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename is\Temecula_ Jefferson New Streets Update_v5;2/25/2019;1ag New Development - Units 50% (1) 1,863 Units 1,300 SF (i) 2,421,900 SF 50% (1) 1,863 Units 960 SF (i) 1,788,480 SF 3,726 Units 1 130 SF 4,210,380 SF 1,149,417 SF 304,888 SF 315 Rooms 800 SF 252,000 SF - SF - SF 60,230 SF 1,766,535 SF - Units 1,863 Units 1,300 SF (i) 2,421,900 SF 1,863 Units 960 SF (i) 1,788,480 SF 3,726 Units 1 130 SF 4,210,380 SF 1,208,535 SF 378,004 SF 315 Rooms 800 SF 252,000 SF 19,402 SF 11,750 SF 60,230 SF 1,929,921 SF Page 23 TABLE B-2 ESTIMATE OF TOTAL RESIDENTS, EMPLOYEES, AND VISITORS NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEXUS STUDY UPDATE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA Residents Multi -Family - Own Multi -Family- Rent I. Total Development at Build -out 1,863 Units 1,863 Units 11. Building Efficiency - - III. Occupancy 95% 95% IV. Occupied Units/SF/Rooms 1,770 Units 1,770 Units V. Density Factor 2.0 Persons/Unit 1.5 Persons/Unit VI. Total New Residents/Visitors 3,540 Residents 2,655 Residents at Build -out VI I. Total 6,195 Residents Residential I. Total Development at Build -out 3,726 Units 1,208,535 SF II. Building Efficiency - 95% III. Occupancy - 90% IV. Occupied Units/SF/Rooms 3,726 Units 1,033,297 SF V. Density Factor 0.025 per Unit 4.0 per 1,000 SF VI. Total Employees at Build -out 93 Employees I 4,133 Employees VII. Total 378,004 SF 95% 90% 323,193 SF 5.0 per 1,000 SF 1,616 Visitors 378,004 SF 95% 90% 323,193 SF 3.0 per 1,000 SF 970 Employees Visitors Hotel 315 Rooms 70% 221 Rooms 1.5 Persons/Room 331 Visitors 1 1,952 Vistors Hotel 315 Rooms 315 Rooms 0.80 per Room 252 Employees 5,501 Employees Mini -Storage 11,750 SF 95% 90% 10,046 SF 0.50 per 1,000 SF 5 Visitors Mini -Storage 19,402 SF 11,750 SF 95% 90% 16,589 SF 11,750 SF 2.5 per 1,000 SF 0.50 per 1,000 SF 41 Employees 6 Employees Parking Lot/Structure 60,230 SF 60,230 SF 0.10 per 1,000 SF 6 Employees Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 24 Filename is\Temecula_ Jefferson New Streets Update_v5;2/25/2019;lag TABLE B-3 ESTIMATE OF RESIDENT EQUIVALENTS NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEXUS STUDY UPDATE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA Total Number of % of Employees/ Customers # of Employees/ Customers # of Employees/ Customers Estimate of Time in Study Area Total Total % of Residents, Employees, Residing Residing Not Residing in Weekend Weekday Weekly Time in Resident Land Use Category and Visitors in Plan Area in Plan Area Plan Area Hours Hours Hours Plan Area Equivalents I. Residential A. Working Residents Residents Employed Outside Study Area 4,529 Residents 73% ---- ---- ---- 48 70 118 70% 3,181 Residents Employed Inside Study Area 737 Residents 12% ---- ---- ---- 48 120 168 100% 737 Total Working Residents 5,266 Residents 85% 74% 3,918 B. Non -Working Residents 929 Residents 15% ---- ---- ---- 48 120 168 100% 929 C. Total Residents 6,195 Residents 100% 78% 4,847 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Non -Residential ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- A. Residential 93 Employees 5% (5) 88 50 50 30% 26 B. Office 4,133 Employees 15% (620) 3,513 50 50 30% 1,046 C. Commercial 970 Employees 10% (97) 873 50 50 30% 260 D. Hotel 252 Employees 5% (13) 239 50 50 30% 71 E. Industrial 41 Employees 5% (2) 39 50 50 30% 12 F. Mini -Storage 6 Employees 5% (0) 6 50 50 30% 2 G. Parking Lots/Structures 6 Employees 5% ll 6 50 50 30% 2 H. Total Non -Residential --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5,501 Employees ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (737) 4,764 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 30% 1,418 ---------------------- III. Visitor -Serving A. Commercial 1,616 Visitors 20% (323) 1,293 20 50 70 42% 539 B. Hotel 331 Visitors 0% 0 331 36 90 126 75% 248 C. Mini -Storage 5 Visitors 20% (1) 4 20 50 70 42% 2 D. Total Visitor -Serving 1,952 Visitors (324) 1,628 48% 789 IV. Total Resident Equivalents 7,054 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 25 Filename is\Temecula_ Jefferson New Streets Update_v5;2/25/2019;lag TABLE B-4 ESTIMATE OF DWELLING UNIT EQUIVALENCY NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEXUS STUDY UPDATE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA Equivalent Total Residents per Unit/ EDUs per Unit/ Equivalent Number of Units/ per 1,000 SF 1,000 SF Land Use Category Residents Non -Residential SF Non -Residential Non -Residential I. Residential Residents 4,847 3,726 Units 1.30 0.99 Employees 26 3,726 Units 0.01 0.01 Total Residential 4,873 3,726 Units 1.31 F 1.00 /EDU/Unit II. Office Employees 1,046 1,208,535 SF 0.87 0.66 /1,000 SF Office III. Commercial Employees 260 378,004 SF 0.69 0.53 Visitors 539 378,004 SF 1.43 1.09 Total Service Commercial 798 2.11 1.62 /1,000 SF Commercial IV. Hotel Employees 71 252,000 SF 0.28 0.22 Visitors 248 252,000 SF 0.99 0.75 Total Hotel 320 1.27 0.97 /1,000 SF Hotel V. Industrial Employees 12 19,402 SF 0.60 0.46 /1,000 SF Industrial VI. Mini -Storage Employees 2 11,750 SF 0.14 0.11 Visitors 2 11,750 SF 0.14 0.11 Total Mini Storage 3 0.29 0.22 /1,000 SF Mini -Storage VII. Parking Lots/Structures Employees 2 60,230 SF 0.03 0.02 /1,000 SF Parking Lots/Structures Vill. Total Residential 4,873 EDUs 3,726 Units 1.31 1.00 /EDU/Unit Non -Residential 2,180 EDUs 1,929,921 SF 1.13 0.86 /1,000 SF 7,054 EDUs Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Page 26 Filename is\Temecula_ Jefferson New Streets Update_v5;2/25/2019;lag TABLE B-5 ESTIMATED NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEXUS STUDY UPDATE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA I. Equivalent Dwelling Units A. Residential Number of Units 3,726 Units Total EDU Factor 1.00 Total EDUs 3,726 B. Office Office SF 1,208,535 SF Total EDU Factor 0.66 Total EDUs 799,383 per 1,000 SF 799 C. Commercial Commercial- 378,004 SF Total EDU Factor 1.62 Total EDUs 610,490 per 1,000 SF 610 D. Hotel Total Hotel SF 252,000 SF Total EDU Factor 0.97 Total EDUs 244,276 per 1,000 SF 244 E. Industrial Industrial SF 19,402 SF Total EDU Factor 0.46 Total EDUs 8,863 per 1,000 SF 9 F. Mini -Storage Mini -Storage SF 11,750 Total EDU Factor 0.22 Total EDUs 2,571 per 1,000 SF 3 G. Parking Lots/Structures Parking Lots/Structures SF 60,230 Total EDU Factor 0.02 Total EDUs 1,297 per 1,000 SF 1 H. Grand Total EDUs 5,393 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename is\Temecula_Jefferson New Streets Update_v5;2/25/2019;lag Page 27 TABLE B-5 (CONT'D.) ESTIMATED NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEE NEXUS STUDY UPDATE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA II. New Streets In -Lieu Fee Per EDU A. Total New Streets Budget Total New Streets Costs Add: Administration @ Total New Streets Budget B. New Streets In -Lieu Fee Per EDU $64,718,000 0% $64,718,000 $12,001 III. Supported In -Lieu Fee A. Residential $12,001 /Unit B. Office $7.94 / SF C. Commercial $19.38 / SF D. Hotel $11.63 / SF E. Industrial $5.48 / SF F. Mini -Storage $2.63 / SF G. Parking Lots/Structures $0.26 / SF Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename is\Temecula_Jefferson New Streets Update_v5;2/25/2019;lag Page 28 Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: LR17-0456 - Uptown Temecula New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Located in the northwestern area of Temecula, bounded by Cherry Street on the north, 1-15 on the east, Rancho California Road on the south, and Diaz Road on the west Proposal: Hold a public hearing to consider the February 2019 New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update for the Uptown Specific Plan ("2019 Updated Nexus Study") which accounts for existing grandfathered uses requesting an expansion of their use that were not considered in the 2015 Nexus Study such as commercial uses, industrial uses, mini -storage, and parking lots/structures, and recommends the reduction of in lieu fees for residential units, office uses and hotel uses. Environmental Action: The approval of the new in lieu fee categories and reduction of fees does not constitute a "project" under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) because such actions involve the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. PLACE OF MEETING: City Council Chambers 41000 Main Street Temecula, California DATE OF MEETING: April 23, 2019 TIME OF MEETING: 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard On February 28, 2019, the 2019 Updated Nexus Study, and the public data indicating the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the service for which the New Streets In -Lieu Fee will be imposed and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the service, including General Fund revenues will be available for public review at City Hall at the location and time described in the last paragraph. On March 26, 2019, the Council heard a presentation from Staff on the 2019 Updated Nexus Study and hear comments from the public, but did not act on the New Streets In -Lieu Fee. On April 23, 2019, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the New Streets In -Lieu Fee and will consider adopting an ordinance to amend Chapter 15.20 of the Municipal Code to adopt in lieu fees for commercial uses, industrial uses, mini -storage uses, and parking lots/structures. At that time, the City Council will also consider a resolution (1) establishing the fees for commercial uses, industrial uses, mini -storage uses, and parking lots/structures, (2) reducing the fees for residential units, office uses, and hotel uses, and (3) eliminating the category of in lieu fees for retail uses, as this category is covered by the new commercial use category. Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the meeting or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the meeting. The proposed project and data concerning the New Streets In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Dale West, City of Temecula Community Development Department by phone at (951) 693-3918 or by email at dale.west@TemeculaCA.gov. ITEM NO . 22 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Approve Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards PREPARED BY: Dale West, Associate Planner II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 19- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, TO CLARIFY THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON -CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS, ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS, AND FINDING THAT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDLELINES SECTION 15162 AND BASED ON THE ADDENDUM TO THE ORIGINAL EIR, NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17-0724) SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: An amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to make clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification of legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, to make minor typographical edits, the adoption of Appendix G, establishing streetscape and sidewalk improvement standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which includes the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. BACKGROUND: The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (UTSP) encompasses approximately 560 acres and is located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, east of Diaz Road/Murrieta Creek and south of Cherry Street. The UTSP includes six districts and two overlay areas, consisting of a mixed -use residential development, as well as property designated for conservation/open space (Murrieta Creek). On November 17, 2015, the City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and as part of the adoption, the Council directed staff to return in 2019 with a status of its implementation, and to prepare a streetscape beautification plan for the newly adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. In June of 2017, staff entered into an agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects to prepare the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards (Sidewalk Standards). The development of the Sidewalk Standards involved two community workshops on July 17, 2017 and August 31, 2017, two meetings with the Planning Commission Subcommittee, consisting of Planning Commissioners... four meetings with the City Council Uptown Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Council Members..., to obtain input and direction while developing the plan. In addition to preparing the Sidewalk Standards, staff has identified various typographical edits and needed clarifications to improve the implementation of the Plan. Proposed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan The proposed amendments to the UTSP include correcting typographical errors, clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, clarification for the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification for legal non -conforming uses, and the inclusion certain land uses as required by state law. During the initial adoption of the UTSP, specific language was crafted to protect property owners of newly created legal non -conforming land uses, as a result of the adoption of the Plan. Following the adoption of the UTSP in November 2015, additional clarification was requested by real estate brokers and landowners concerning the policies for legal non -conforming land uses, as it relates to parcels with multiple buildings and parcels with multiple tenants. The policy for legal non -conforming land uses has been further clarified for situations when there is an individual parcel with a multi -tenant building that contains one or more legal non -conforming land use, or an individual parcel with multiple buildings and tenants where there is one or more legal non -conforming land use. In these situations, a property owner may lease a vacant suite or building to a similar non -conforming use, as permitted under the previous zoning, until such time that the building or buildings on site are occupied by only legally permitted uses, as allowed under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan for a period of twenty-four months or more. This policy allows flexibility for landowners and is consistent with the goals and objectives of Uptown Temecula, as the area transitions from a suburban commercial uses into urban mixed -use neighborhoods. The remaining proposed amendments are minor in nature, add clarification or correct typographical edits, and are outlined in Attachment A of the corresponding Ordinance of this staff report. Proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is a form -based code, which focuses on the physical form of buildings and their relationship to the public realm, of which consists of the sidewalk and street. Generally speaking, for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, this means that any new building that fronts a street is to be placed ten feet behind the property line, creating a twenty foot sidewalk. The proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards primarily focus on this area of the sidewalk by identifying the concrete finish and color, tree species, tree grates, understory plant mix, and street light fixtures for all of Uptown Temecula. The streets within the UTSP are categorized into three street types: Major District Connector, Minor District Connector, and Neighborhood Street. The concrete finishes and score pattern, tree species, and understory plants vary depending on the street type within Uptown Temecula. This adds variety, interest, and creates a natural "way -finding" throughout the Uptown Temecula area. The following is a summary of the major elements of the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards for Uptown Temecula. Allees, Medians and Gateways: Two primary entrance gateways into Uptown Temecula are located at the north and southern ends of Jefferson Avenue. The north gateway begins at Cherry Street and the south gateway begins at Rancho California Road. Both gateways share a distinguishing characteristic in that they are linear gateways framed by Jefferson Avenue to the east and Murrieta Creek to the west. These open space areas provide an opportunity to create unique pedestrian gateways at the north and south entrances into Uptown and are referred to as an "allee." The allees provide an opportunity for a generously landscaped walkway, lined with California Sycamore, and an alternating sand/aggregate concrete finish, also adding interest and character to the allee. In addition to the allee, these two primary gateways include landscaped medians wide enough to accommodate drought tolerant understory planting and the flowering Western Redbud accent tree. These primary gateways will also allow for wayfinding signage, accent lighting, and/or public art. Key intersections within the UTSP will also act as gateways to the neighborhoods of Uptown Temecula. Key intersections will be unique in that their intersecting corners will have distinct characteristics including bulb -outs (where appropriate), concrete pavers, stamped asphalt crosswalks, and enhanced landscaping. The key intersection gateways are located at: • Jefferson Avenue/Sanborn Avenue • Jefferson AvenueBuecking Drive • Jefferson AvenueNia Montezuma • Jefferson Avenue/Del Rio Road • Jefferson Avenue/La Haciendas • Jefferson Avenue/Calle Cortez • Winchester Road/Commerce Center Drive • Commerce Center Drive/Overland Drive • Commerce CenterNia Montezuma • Winchester Road//Diaz Road • Overland Avenue/Diaz Road See page 18 of the attached Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards for additional information. Sidewalk Materials, Street Trees, and Street Lights To add variety, interest, and natural way -finding throughout the Uptown Temecula area, sidewalk concrete finishes and score patterns, tree species, understory plants and light standards will differ depending on the district and street within Uptown Temecula. Major District Connector Street (Jefferson Avenue) The Major District Connector Street serves as the "Grand Boulevard" within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Like the allees, Jefferson Avenue will use the alternating sand/aggregate concrete finish; however, it will include brick pavers within the utility zone, tree grates, and an evergreen street tree (Fern Pine). Jefferson Avenue will have the only sidewalk with tree grates, pavers in the utility zone, and light poles with both a streetlight and pedestrian light, equipped with the option for banners. Because Jefferson Avenue is the main thoroughfare through Uptown Temecula, it will be the only sidewalk to have such unique character. Minor District Connector Streets Minor District Connector streets form the major circulation spines of each District. They are different from the Major District Connector in that they will only have the sand concrete finish as opposed to the alternating sand/aggregate concrete finish. They will have the African Sumac or the Brisbane tree species, as well as understory planting within the tree well, and pedestrian only lights instead of the street/pedestrian light combination. The variation in materials is intended to provide interest and differing character depending on where one is within Uptown Temecula. Neighborhood Streets Neighborhood Streets are the smaller streets that are internal to the Districts within Uptown and are important for building the character of a particular neighborhood for providing walkability. Similar to the Minor District Connector, Neighborhood Streets are characterized with having the sand concrete finish, but have an alternating five foot and two and half foot score pattern. North/south direction Neighborhood Streets will have the Crape Myrtle with understory planting within the tree well, whereas, the east/west direction streets will have the Marina Madrone with understory planting within the tree well. All Neighborhood Streets will include pedestrian only lights. The draft UTSP Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards may be found in Attachment B of the corresponding Ordinance of this staff report. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and the proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards and adopted Resolution No. 19-12 on March 20, 2019 recommending the City Council approved the proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and the proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR has been prepared, which concludes that the proposed changes, additions, or modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and/or mitigated in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified in November 2015 (SCH #2013061012). None of the conditions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that require the preparation of a subsequent EIR are present, and no additional environmental review is required. A Notice of Determination will be filed with the County Clerk of the Board. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Council Draft Ordinance Exhibit A. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments Exhibit B. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2. Planning Commission Staff Report 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 19-12 4. Notice of Public Hearing ORDINANCE NO. 19- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, TO CLARIFY THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON -CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS, ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS, AND FINDING THAT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 AND BASED ON THE ADDENDUM TO THE ORIGINAL EIR, NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17-0724) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals and Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 17, 2015, the Temecula City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and directed staff to prepare a streetscape beautification plan for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. B. In February of 2016, staff initiated the preparation of the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards and entered into an agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects to assist with the preparation of the streetscape and sidewalk improvement standards. C. In April of 2017, staff identified a need to amend the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to make clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification of legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, and to make minor typographical edits. D. In July and August of 2017, staff along with Spurlock Landscape Architects, held two community workshops to obtain the input into the development of sidewalk landscape standards. E. On March 20, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider whether to recommend the adoption of the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan, and the proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. City staff presented a report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the proposed Project. At the conclusion of the March 6, 2019 Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission, including both an oral and written staff report and public comment, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 19-12, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON -CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND TO ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN ARE EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17-0724)" F. On April 23, 2019, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the proposed Project including the proposed amendments to the Specific Plan and the proposed Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The City Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the proposed Specific Plan amendment, and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards prior to and at the public hearing. SECTION 2. Legislative Findings. Based on the evidence and all other applicable information presented, the City Council makes the following findings regarding the Specific Plan: A. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.020(E), the City Council in amending the Specific Plan and adopting the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards finds determines and declares that: (1) The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the General Plan, as amended. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development in order to maintain the overall quality of life within the City. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design, and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. These amendments do not conflict with any goals, policies or standards of the Temecula General Plan and do not conflict with any goals, policies or development standards of the adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. (2) The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan project has been reviewed by the Public Works and Fire Departments staff to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design, and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. (3) The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards do not change the land use designations or anticipated land use developments as proposed under the Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards provide clarifications development standards, state required land uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area. (4) The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The approved Specific Plan is a form -based code, which emphasizes the physical form of buildings to foster predictable built results as the organizing principle for the code, rather than focusing on the strict separation of uses. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards clarify development standards and requirements related to legal non -conforming uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area, thereby, ensuring the Specific Plan area will be developed in the desired character as anticipated with the adoption of the Specific Plan and continue to provide for a mix of land uses including commercial and residential uses, consistent with the surrounding area. SECTION 3. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment. A. The City Council hereby amends portions of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and directs staff to incorporate the changes as indicated in Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance. SECTION 4. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. A. The City Council hereby adopts the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Standards as shown in Exhibit `B" of this Ordinance, and amends the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to incorporate the Uptown Temecula Streetscape as a new Appendix "G" to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. SECTION 5. CEQA In November 2015, the City Council certified an EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (State Clearing House #2013061012). Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared because some changes or additions to the certified EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present and therefore a subsequent EIR does not need to be prepared. Staff was directed to file a Notice of Determination. SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the final decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Ordinance shall be and remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 8. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , 2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 19- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of April, 2019, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Exhibit A Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments Deleted text shown with stFikethFe gh aAd- red- fe-PA New text shown with underline and blue font Chapter 2 Plan Administration C. Plan Applicability The regulations of this plan shall not apply to any application for a conditional use permit on a property within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area that was submitted to and deemed complete by the City's Community Development Department on or before April 28, 2015, but not yet approved, denied or conditionally approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning Commission on or before the effective date of Ordinance No. 2015-13 approving this plan. In considering such an application, the City Council may impose reasonable conditions on the conditional use permit in order to mitigate the impact of the project that would otherwise be compatible with the allowable uses and development standards under the Plan, including, without limitation, the duration of the incompatible use and architectural design of the project. E. Legal Non -Conformities 2. Legal Non -Conforming Land Uses Any use of land that was lawfully established and in compliance with all applicable ordinances and laws at the time the use was established; however, due to a subsequently enacted ordinance or law, no longer complies with the applicable regulations or standards of the zone in which the use is located shall be considered a legal non -conforming use. Legal non -conforming uses that were legally established prior to the adoption of this specific plan are allowed to continue as they were, prior to the date of adoption of the specific plan. For an individual parcel with a multi -tenant building, or an individual parcel with multiple buildings, where a legal non -conforming use exists on site, the property owner may lease a vacant suite or building to like non -conforming uses, as permitted under the previous zoning, until such time that the buildine or buildinEs on site are occupied by only legally permitted uses as allowed under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan for a period of twentv-four months or more. Specific Plan Phased Compliance The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is expected to redevelop incrementally over a 20-year horizon as new development becomes economically feasible. As such, flexible development standards have been established based upon the scope of the proposed project as outlined in table 2-2. Table 2.2: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan - Phased Compliance Matrix Scope of Development Proposal Corresponding Planning Specific Plan Compliance Application Type Required Any project that proposes the Adaptive Reuse Application Adaptive Reuse Standards adaptive reuse of an existing building. A proposed change or modification to Sign Permit Architectural Design Guidelines the exterior of an existing building Sign Program without the addition of new square Minor Modification footage. 1 Major Modification Building additions totaling 10% or less Minor Modification Relative to the new addition only: • Architectural Design Guidelines of the existing square footage on a Major Modification project site in existence prior to the • Signage Standards adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Building additions greater than 10% Major Modification Relative to the new addition only: • Architectural Design Guidelines and up to 50% of the existing square footage on a project site in existence • Signage Standards prior to the adoption of the Uptown • Building Type Standards Temecula Specific Plan. • Frontage Type Standards • Building Placement Standards • Maximum Building Height Standards • Parking Placement Standards • Minimum Parking Space Requirements Building additions greater than 50% of Major Modification All specific plan requirements the existing square footage on a apply (including land uses) project site in existence prior to the adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, or proposed additions which exceed 50% of the current market value of the existing structure (s) on a project site (as determined by an appraisal certification) New development proposals Development Plan All specific plan requirements apply (including land uses) 'Examples include: paint color changes, patio additions, addition of awnings, material changes, relocation of window and door, etc. Chapter 3 Land Use & Development Standards B. Land Use Regulations Table 3-1: Land Use Matrix List of Uses UHT US UA WH-RO 6 CV CV -CO MCR-OS Day care/preschool (commercial)' P P P P �P C R C - Residential care facilities (six or fewer)' P Residential care facilities (seven to twelve)' C Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer)' P Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven to twelve)' C FOOTNOTES: 'Subject to the Standards for Specific Uses outlined in Section 3A.-C. ' All new development on a vacant parcel or redevelopment of a parcel within an Overlay area shall conform to the allowable uses of the Overlay as specified. Additionally, until such time that a parcel within an Overlay area is redeveloped by adding more than 50% of the existing square footage on the project site, or by proposed addition which exceeds 50% of the current market value of the existing structure(s) on site, (as specified in Table 2-2 of the UTSP), land uses within a legal non -conforming building may be those uses that are allowed within the underlying District, as specified in Table 3-1. F. Building and Parking Placement Standards The standards for building and parking placement are the same for all districts within the specific plan; however, the standards may vary depending on adjacent streets, freeway frontage and creek frontage. New buildings constructed in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area are required to be placed on a build -to line, adjacent to the street, to create a pedestrian scaled environment and facilitate a building's relationship to the public realm. The placement of buildings on the build -to -line may vary depending on the existing Right-of-Wav and street cross section as specified in Chaster 3.H Sidewalk Standards. Parking and Loading Facilities shall be placed on a site in accordance with the following requirements. F.,"9 Exhibits 3-9 through 3-12 identifies the building and parking placement requirements for lots based on the geographic location within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan areas as follows: Lots Frontier a New and/or Existing Street Table 3-10: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting a New or Existing Street Parking Placement Building Placement Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium 2,3 A Property Line to Build - 10 ft. from property line N/A to Line Rear ar Interior Side B Yard Setback (with eF 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line With Alley-0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley — 5 ft. from property line 50 ft. from the build -to line C Street Frontage 10 ft. behind the property line on (recommended)° Setback" the build -to line 20 ft. from the build -to line (minimum)4 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. z When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50' minimum parking setback. Table 3-11: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting 1-15 Parking Placement Building Placement Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium 2,3 A Property Line to Build -to 10 ft. from property line N/A Line Ream Interior Side B Yard Setback (with 9F^F without an alley) 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line With Alley-0 ft. from property line Without Alley — 5 ft. from property B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line line C Freeway Frontage 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line 50 ft. from the build -to line U Street Frontage Setback 10 ft. behind the property line on the (recommended)° build -to line 20 ft. from the build -to line (minimu m)4 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. z When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50' minimum parking setback. Table 3-12: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting Murrieta Creek Parking Placement Building Placement Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium 2,3 A Property Line to Build -to Line 10 ft. from property line N/A Rear eK Interior Side Yard B Setback 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line a4ey) With Alley-0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley — 5 ft. from property line C Murrieta Creek Frontage 20 ft. from property line 0 20 ft. from property line D Street Frontage Setback' 10 ft. behind the property line 50 ft. from the build -to line (recommended)° on the build -to line 20 ft. from the build -to line (minimum)° 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. z When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50' minimum parking setback. Table 3-13: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting Santa Gertrudis Creek Parking Placement Building Placement Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium 2,3 A Property Line to Build -to 10 ft. from property line N/A Line Rear ar Interior Side B Yard Setback (with GF 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line With Alley-0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley — 5 ft. from Property line C Santa Gertrudis Creek 20 ft. from property line 0 20ft. from property line Frontage 50 ft. from the build -to line (recommended)4 Street Frontage Setback 10 ft. behind the property line D 1 on the build -to line 20 ft. from the build -to line (minimum)4 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. z When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50' minimum parking setback. H. Sidewalk Standards The sidewalks are intended to establish the pedestrian as the priority from curb `� � \ r to storefront. The functionality of a \ ' J walkable district is achieved through logical streetscape design and compliance with uniform sidewalk — standards. The sidewalk design � r standards emphasize the importance of the placement of buildings in relation to the sidewalk, street and public realm. Consequently, the sidewalk design standards take a two -pronged approach to sidewalk design: 1) they outline requirements for the property located F�rnsh Q'eT`r`20� e2O�eto3��e within the public right-of-way, and 2) o e6� they provide requirements for the space C a �- 6�6 °ne,g ,IS) located on private property between the property line and build -to line. In order to achieve adequate sidewalk width to accommodate pedestrian movement, all development projects shall be required to comply with the sidewalk cross sections show in Exhibit 3-15. Several of the street cross sections are shown havine more than 10 feet within the Right-of-way. In these circumstances, if the building is placed ten feet behind the property line (or on the "Build - to Line") as required is Chapter 3, Section F, the full sidewalk width would be greater than 20 feet. Due to the approved street cross sections and existing Right -of -Way, the placement of the buildings may vary in order to achieve a 20-foot sidewalk. Example: The Jefferson Avenue Cross Section Area 2-B (Section 3-H) shows the sidewalk area within the Right -of -Way as 12 feet. A developer that is required to build the sidewalk between the face of the building and the Right -of -Way may be allowed to place the building at eight feet behind the property line. in order to comply with the intent of the Specific Plan for having 20-foot sidewalks. I. Street Cross Section Standards The existing streets within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include Jefferson Avenue, Winchester Road, Enterprise Circle North, Enterprise Circle South, Commerce Center Drive, Overland Drive, Del Rio Road, Calle Cortez, Las Haciendas, Via Montezuma, Ryder Way, Beuking Road, Sanborn Avenue, Madison Avenue and McCabe Court. Cross section standards have been developed for the existing streets to transform them into more complete streets with on -street parking, bike lanes, and wider sidewalks. The following cross section standards were designed to fit within the existing right -of way and curb -to -curb widths of the above mentioned streets, eliminating the need to widen streets and relocate utilities. These cross sections are to be used when the City prepares its Capital Improvement Program for re - striping and when a developer is required, as part of a development project, to construct the remaining improvements as a condition of approval. A new street that is proposed or required as part of a new development project shall be connected to another new or existing street and/or alley. `^'"^^ street is pFepesed, the new stree design shall be compatible I.A.fith t-.h.p- cennecting street design and the preposed right ef " existing StFeets, and is subject te the Feview and appFaval of the Gity'S TFaffie Engineer and ^ir^rc*^r ^{ Publie ` erl(sWhen a new street is proposed, the new street cross section shall be 1) one of the approved cross sections from this Plan, 2) compatible with the connecting street design, and 3) subject to the review and approval of the City's Traffic Engineer and Director of Public Works. Chapter 5 Design Guidelines E. Utility Guidelines 1. Existing and New Water Service Design Considerations: Underground water plans sheuld shall be provided to the City to allow Community Development staff to verify the proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check (DDCs) prior to final agreement with the utility companies. ii. Double detector check valves se, -Id shall be placed above ground to meet Rancho California Water District's Standard Drawing RW-20. Double detector checks should shall be installed in a location that is internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of- way, or placed in a manner that is architecturally integrated into the building design. iii. The placement of DDCs and other water related utilities in alleyways, parking lots, or within a building "notch out" (internal to the project site) is encouraged to better integrate the utility equipment into the building's architectural design. iv. DDCs and other water related utilities should shall not be placed adjacent to the sidewalk along the building facades that face the street. This will ensure safe and comfortable pedestrian path of travel along the sidewalks. V. Compact, vertical DDC's should be used whenever feasible. vi. Landscape construction drawings should shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. A three-foot clear zone should be provided around fire double detector checks as required by the Riverside County Fire Department. Utility equipment should be grouped together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an afterthought. vii. DDCs and other water utility equipment slued shall be placed on private property and not within the right of way. Easements should be obtained for DDCs and other water utility equipment when they are placed on private property. viii. Fire Department connections shall be wall mounted on the street side of the building. 2. Existing and New Electrical Service Design Considerations: i. As required by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 04-02, all new electrical lines up to 34 Kv shall be under -grounded. ii. All utility equipment shall be located out of the pedestrian path of travel. All electrical utility equipment, electrical meters, and junction boxes aFe enearaged to shall be placed within a utility room. If a utility room is not feasible or appropriate, en Ure that then all utility equipment is- shall be purposefully and aesthetically designed as an integral part of the building, placed adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, or within rear or side yards and screened from public view. other utility equipmeRt Shall be -achieved by eRcouraging that all equipment be placed adjacent te alleyways, within parkiRg areas, within rear er side yards, or *R a building "Retch eur n nII utility equipment Should h., IAA-;;*.,.J A t ..f the pedestrian path of travel iv. Early coordination with Southern California Edison should occur in order to ensure that transformers are placed in a mannerthat makes the least aesthetic impact, and to ensure that transformers are well screened and in compliance with utility provider's standards. 3 Existing and New Natural Gas Service Design Considerations: i. Ensure safe ingress and egress to gas meters for maintenance, meter reading, and service while simultaneously encouraging the placement of equipment that makes the least aesthetic impact to the built environment. +� All utility equipment shall be located out of the pedestrian path of travel. All utility equipment shall be purposefully and aesthetically placed adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, rear or side yards, or within building "notch outs" and screened from public view. equipmentalleyways, withiR paFkiRg areas, rear or side yards, er;.yithin bu-4-fing "notch euts." All utility sh.,, ,I.J be I. C-Zat ,.J .,,A .,f the r,.,. estriaR r,;rh Af +ravel iii. Gas meters sheuld shall be well screened and in compliance with utility provider's standards. A 3-foot wide minimum clearance should be provided when landscaping is utilized as the screening method. iv. When appropriate, gas meters should shall be painted to blend into the built environment. V. Consultation with Southern California Gas regarding meter cabinet design guidelines and appropriate screening methods should occur early in the project design process. City of Temecula Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards a The Heart of Southern California Wine Country January 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Design Intent 3.0 Design Standards 35 4.0 Appendix 125 INTRODUCTION 0 Introduction 1.1 Project Background, Framework and References 1.2 Purpose: Importance of Sidewalk Improvement Standards 7 1.3 Relationship to City Landscape Standards 8 1.4 Applicability of Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 8 1.5 How to use this Document 9 1.0 INTRODUCTION The recently adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan establishes a vision and excellent framework for the development of exciting new bicycle and pedestrian friendly urban neighborhoods, with opportunities for living, working, shopping and a wide range of recreational activities. Set between the Wilder Hills to the west and vibrant commercial and residential development and the lush tranquility of the wine country to the east, Uptown Temecula has two distinct frontages—Murrieta Creek with its trails and lovely riparian habitat and the I-15 corridor, busy with local and regional commuters and visitors. The Uptown Temecula District is well -positioned to make the most of these adjacencies, harnessing their distinct but complementary characteristics. Regional Context Diagram The Project location encompasses areas of the community that were developed at different times under largely informal streetscape plans. As such, the condition of the public spaces and associated streetscape infrastructure vary considerably. The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards focus on improvements to public rights -of -way, including streets, sidewalks and gateways. It will identify public street design elements, landscaping, intersection enhancements, entry treatments, and other unique public realm features within the various districts of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Focusing on the public right-of-way, these standards attempt to balance pedestrian needs with vehicular and bicycle needs. It is not the intent to provide specific street geometric design standards. Rather, it is to provide design -oriented treatments of the public realm. Site Context and Character Diagram Existing Conditions: Minimal Pedestrian Amenities Existing Conditions: Discontinuous sidewalks 7 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.1 Project Background, Framework and References The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are an addendum to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (UTSP) which was developed with extensive community input to determine the best land uses and development standards necessary to create a new and vibrant Uptown Temecula. The Specific Plan is a form - based development code which provides for a range of uses including mixed use residential development, access to open space and recreational areas, and improved pedestrian, bicycle, vehicular mobility and connectivity. The form -based code focuses on building form, building placement, and the creation of a pedestrian scale environment. Accordingly, the Specific Plan calls for streets that achieve a better balance between the needs of pedestrians, bicycles, cars and public transit and achieve the community's vision for a bicycle and pedestrian friendly urban experience. go... the Specific Plan calls for streets that achieve a better balance between the needs of pedestrians, bicycles, cars and public transit.. PP Existing Roadway Network To accomplish this goal, the existing right-of-way (ROW) and curb -to -curb street cross sections were evaluated to determine if on -street parking, bicycle facilities, and 20-foot sidewalks were feasible throughout the Specific Plan area. The result was a series of 44 new street cross sections that include 20-foot sidewalks, on -street parking, bicycle facilities, curb bulb -outs at intersections, bus turn -outs, and painted or raised medians. The new cross sections fit within the existing ROW and curb -to -curb sections, enabling the existing street cross sections to be retrofitted with the new street cross sections without acquiring additional ROW or the need to widen any of the existing streets. Future Hypothetical Street Grid Network New streets were added to the Specific Plan in order to create a grid pattern street network with smaller blocks and increased connectivity creating more pedestrian friendly and walkable neighborhoods and improved mobility throughout the Specific Plan area. The location of new streets is proposed as a hypothetical street network to allow for flexibility in their location as development occurs. The hypothetical street network will be constructed as new development occurs where new block size standards are exceeded. The highest priority new streets are those that help complete overall connectivity within the District for example by resolving existing cul-de-sacs (as within the Sports District), creating strong Neighborhood connector streets (as at Commerce Center Drive) and completing connections to the community from west to east (as at Overland Drive). Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.2 Purpose: Importance of Sidewalk Improvement Standards he Specific Plan defines a series of sub -districts or neighborhoods, interconnected by the existing street rights of way, as well as additional proposed streets, all configured to create a generous pedestrian and bike -oriented network. Based on the Specific Plan Recommendations and Goals, the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are intended to provide standards and direction for implementation of the various hardscape and planting components of the pedestrian realm to ensure consistency and continuity of character and materials in the realization of the community's vision for Uptown Temecula. Sidewalk Improvement Guideline objectives are to: 1. Create public improvements that support Mixed and Flexible Land Uses and are activated day and night • Consider strategies for implementation over an extended time period • Reinforce framework defined in the Specific Plan for knitting together pedestrian improvements within the Right of Way to the building frontage. • Define hardscape and planting material standards that are distinctive, but economical and easily maintained 2. Create an environment that encourages walking, improves multi -modal mobility and connectivity including to open space and trails • Provide minimum 5' wide pedestrian walkways, clear of obstructions, throughout all the neighborhoods of the Uptown Specific Plan • Provide crosswalks at intersections to allow for improved pedestrian connections • Connect to existing and proposed multi - modal trails • Locate site furnishings in well-defined zones that do not obstruct pedestrian traffic flow Establish District Identity —and define sub - districts and neighborhoods —with a streetscape improvement program that provides continuity and cohesive character that connects to Temecula's particular sense of place. • Provide standards for paving materials, finishes and patterns to ensure consistency throughout the Specific Plan area. • Provide plant palettes for each District throughout the Specific Plan area • Provide a framework for identity signage, public art and District -specific enhancements Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.3 Relationship to City Landscape Standards The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards apply throughout the Uptown Temecula specific Plan area and provide design standards for improvements within the public right-of-way. These Standards supplement the Landscape Design Requirements within the City of Temecula Municipal Code. City of Temecula Municipal Code, Section 17.32.060, Landscape Design Requirements. City of Temecula City Wide Design Guidelines (2005) Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (2015) Multi -use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan (2016) City of Temecula General Plan (2005) 1.4 Applicability of Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards All future development and land use proposals located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan project boundaries, shall be governed by the requirements of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. No development shall be undertaken without prior approval and issuance of the appropriate development entitlement or land use permit pursuant to the administration provisions of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. These regulations apply to all new development and modifications to existing developments as provided herein and as provided in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The City of Temecula recognizes that some sites may have challenges complying with regulations herein, as not all circumstances of future proposed projects can be anticipated; therefore, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan provides for minor exceptions and variances within certain parameters, as discussed in Section F of the Specific Plan. Compliance with the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards is required when new development is proposed or building additions greater than 10% of the existing square footage on a project site are proposed. This is consistent with the Phased Compliance schedule of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which requires specific compliance with the Plan based upon the scope of the proposed project, as outlined in Table 2-2 of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.5 How to Use this Document Section: Design Intent 2.0 The Design Intent 2.0 section is organized by street typologies outlining design intent and overall framework. Enhanced intersections are required at all intersecting streets. Some intersections are intended to incorporate bulb -outs, enhanced paving materials, wayfinding features, iconic signage, or public art and act as gateways into neighborhoods and the greater Uptown Temecula area. When designing or reviewing a project, first review the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Street Cross Sections and then the Gateway exhibit and Enhanced Intersections and Gateways exhibits of this document to determine the type of enhancements and design feature intended for an intersection. Section: Design Standards 3.0 The Design Standards 3.0 section complies typical plans showing hardscape and planting material selections for each street type, organized by district. Section: Appendix 4.0 The Appendix 4.0 section includes additional technical specifications, descriptions and product information. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards DESIGN INTENT Design Intent 2.1 District Neighborhoods 2.2 Neighborhood Themes 2.3 District Gateways 2.4 Street Typologies 2.5 Sidewalk Zones ■ 13 13 13 18 22 25 2.6 Enhanced Intersections and Gateway Bulb -outs 28 2.7 Hardscape Framework 30 2.8 Street Trees and Understory Planting 32 2.0 DESIGN INTENT hese regulations apply to all new development and modifications to existing developments as provided herein and as provided in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The City of Temecula recognizes that some sites may have challenges complying with regulations herein, as not all circumstances of future proposed projects can be anticipated; therefore, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan provides for minor exceptions and variances within certain parameters, as discussed in Section F of the Specific Plan. 2.1 District Neighborhoods The neighborhoods defined in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan are the basis for organizing the Standards. Each zoning district and overlay zone has specific land uses and development standards which vary slightly by district in order to achieve differences between the districts. The boundaries of each district and overlay zone were established based on the existing land uses, geographic and surrounding physical features, and the desired vision of the community. Each neighborhood defines its unique signature through the selection of sidewalk paving materials, street trees, lighting and site furnishings. Uptown Center District, Uptown Hotel and Tourism District, Uptown Sports and Transit District, Uptown Arts District, and Creekside Village District as well as two overlays: Wilder Hills Residential and Creekside Commercial Overlay. 2.2 Neighborhood Themes Uptown Center District Uptown Center District is considered to be the urban heart of the Uptown Temecula area. Characterized by multi -story mixed -use buildings lining both sides of Jefferson Avenue the District contains two important gateway intersections at Overland Drive and Winchester Road, intended to convey a strong sense of arrival and sense of place for those entering the Uptown Temecula area by public transit, car, bicycle, or on foot. Capitalizing on its visual window from Interstate 15, and its strong accessibility from the freeway, the district is intended to become Temecula's employment hub and the Region's financial district attracting large, high -quality employers. The residential presence will synergistically attract and support the nearby commercial uses, further contributing to the area's vibrant urban character. Enhanced connectivity and walkability will become key components of the area's character and aesthetic urban feel and the density of future development will eventually support expanded transit service. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan District Map Creekside Village Commercial Overlay With a strong visual window from Interstate-15 and within easy walking distance of adjacent Uptown Hotel/ Tourism District, Creekside Village and Utown Art Districts, The Creekside Village Commercial Overlay zone Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 13 Uptown Hotel / Tourism District Capitalizing and building upon the existing cluster of hotels, restaurants and other visitor -serving land uses within this area, the Uptown Hotel/Tourism District is the principal hospitality -oriented, visitor and tourist serving district. Located at the major southern gateway into the specific plan area, just north of Old Town and east of Murrieta Creek, the District character will convey a sense of arrival into a markedly urban neighborhood also influenced by the more rustic character of the creek setting. Visitors to this area will be able to easily walk to the nearby Murrieta Creek trail, Creekside Village Commercial Overlay and Old Town to visit the nearby shops and restaurants. Consequently, pedestrian oriented intersection improvements are planned at the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Rancho California Road to better accommodate multi -modal connectivity, promote safety, and facilitate easy walkability or biking. Uptown Sports / Transit District Located to the east of the future Regional Park and recreation facility, and with a strong visual window from Interstate 15, this district is characterized by mid to high rise urban buildings with new streets to further enhance connectivity and circulation. Adjacent to the northernmost gateway into the Specific Plan area, the District character will communicate a strong sense of arrival into Uptown Temecula. The District is bound by the Santa Gertrudis Creek and adjacent Murrieta Creek trail to the south and its character will support and complement the adjacent regional park facility with a mix of land uses including hotel and guest -serving facilities, commercial, and retail uses. In combination with urban residential dwellings, the neighborhood will be active day, evenings and weekends, and the nearby park facility will provide an amenity for visitors and residents. Enhanced pedestrian crossings and refuge islands are envisioned at key intersections along Jefferson Avenue to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and safe access across Jefferson Avenue to the park site to the west. Given its location relative to Interstate 15 and on the border with Murrieta, this district may accommodate a future transit station, anticipated to provide for both high frequency public transit service and bus rapid transit service. In anticipation of this future facility, the Uptown Sports/Transit District encourages Transit Oriented Development (TOD) characterized by clusters of compact, walkable, urban development. Uptown Center District Illustrative Photo Uptown Hotel / Tourism Illustrative Photo Uptown Sports / Transit Illustrative Photo 14 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Uptown Arts District The Uptown Arts District is envisioned to become the vibrant and eclectic cultural arts destination in the Uptown Temecula area. In order to establish the Uptown Arts District as Temecula's cultural arts hub, this area is intended to accommodate a variety of arts - related land uses such as art galleries, artist lofts, work spaces, and various performance venues, as well as a mix of urban residential units, including live/ work spaces stimulating pedestrian activity within the area during the day, evenings and weekends. The Uptown Art District's character is eclectic and artsy vibe reflecting the diverse land use mix within the neighborhood. Commerce Center Drive is intended to promote walkability, cycling and a pedestrian friendly environment within the district's central core. Future streetscape improvements along Commerce Center Drive are envisioned to provide safe pedestrian crossings and traffic calming features to further enhance this street's pedestrian -oriented character. Additionally, this district's close proximity to Murrieta Creek and the adjacent Murrieta Creek trail system will provide an outdoor amenity to be enjoyed by the nearby residential dwellings and the art -related uses. Creekside Village District The character of this District will be defined as high -density urban residential in a mix of building types. Limited neighborhood -serving commercial uses are anticipated to complement the residential development. The residential population within this District will activate the area during the day, evenings and weekends. The streets and sidewalks are designed to maximize pedestrian comfort and safety, making walking and biking the preferred mode of transportation for short trips. It is anticipated that a number of new street connections will be constructed as development occurs in the future to better accommodate pedestrian walkability, enhance way -finding, promote area -wide connectivity, and develop a more defined street grid pattern within the specific plan area. Wilder Hills Residential Overlay This area's character will be defined by low rise residential dwellings of up to 3 stories in height and is intended to provide a walkable residential neighborhood nestled between a local cultural arts cluster and Murrieta Creek. This overlay area is the only fully residential area within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area and the character of this area will be achieved through compact residential development that promotes walking and biking to destinations such as the adjacent Murrieta Creek recreational trail and shopping, eating establishments, and employment located in close proximity to residential neighborhood. Uptown Arts District Illustrative Photo Creekside Village Illustrative Photo Wilder Hills Residential Overlay Illustrative Photo Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 15 is primarily a commercial area, capitalizing on its visibility from the freeway by providing commercial uses along this visual window. Ground floor uses are commercial establishments such as specialty shops and restaurants to activate the public realm and create a retail -oriented, walkable pedestrian corridor along Jefferson Avenue. Streetscape components are specifically designed to enhance the pedestrian experience and overall aesthetic image of this area from Interstate 15. Creekside Village Commercial Overlay Illustrative Photo 16 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.3 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Gateways he Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is defined by a series of gateways which welcome and orient residents and visitors to the area as a whole as well as the distinct Districts within. The Gateways are classified as Primary, Secondary and Tertiary. LEGEND e Secondary Gateway Public Art/ Iconic Element Gateway Allee Entry Median A B C D E F H Gateway Marker: See corresponding letter descriptions on the following pages Creek ,,,,, .4 Drainage Channel Future Street TN 1400SCALE Figure X.X Gateway Diagram COMMUNITY CONNECTOR 18 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards any of the gateways include iconic components such as District signage or public art. General criteria for these components are described below and in accompanying diagrams and plan graphics. These iconic components will be further defined in concert with future developments with input from the community and stakeholders as part of overall Neighborhood visioning, wayfinding and branding. Gateways should be treated with a consistent material palette as articulated in the hardscape and planting palettes described in Chapters 3 and 4 of this document. Additional strategies for providing a framework/ infrastructure for future implementation include identifying areas for accent paving that does not disturb the patterning and cohesiveness of standard sidewalk paving; providing streetlights with capabilities for banners, flowerpots, festival lights and other amenities; ensuring the layout of sidewalk bulb -outs have adequate space for public art or other unique features without impeding the flow of pedestrian traffic. The function and character of each of these gateways is described below: Primary Gateways: A: South and North Jefferson Median Gateways These form the major entries to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. Using the same defining character they are framed by buildings to the east and the Murrieta Creek open space with a multi -use trail to the west. They are also linear gateways, described by a sequence of distinct and iconic streetscape components. The east side of the gateway follows the streetscape standards for Jefferson Avenue, the Major District Connector Street. The adjacency to open space and trail provides a unique opportunity for a more generously planted allee flanking a pedestrian/bike trail on the west side. In addition, per the Specific Plan, these gateway locations will include medians wide enough to accommodate accent trees and understory planting as well as iconic District feature(s) such as signage, accent lighting and/or public art. Murrieta Creekside Pedestrian Gateway Illustrative Graphic Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 19 B: Overland and Winchester Gateways The intersections of Jefferson Avenue with these two Community Connector streets comprise major entry points from Temecula neighborhoods to the east of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. These gateways are marked by enhanced paving in the vehicular intersections, as well as iconic District feature(s) such as signage, accent lighting and/or public art at the sidewalk bulb -outs. Secondary Gateways: C: Uptown Arts District Gateways Commerce Center Drive intersects Overland Drive and Winchester Road over its length, creating District gateways for visitors and residents travelling east and west through the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. These gateways are marked by accent paving, planting and iconic public art and/or signage. The gateways should be visible from Jefferson Avenue as a break in the standard streetscape—a flash of color or the distinct materiality of public art or neighborhood signage, communicating the Uptown Arts District as a place with unique character and culture. D: Del Rio "Y" The intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road forms the southern gateway to the Creekside Village District as well as an important point of confluence between the more urban and retail -oriented character to the east along Jefferson Avenue, and the quieter, more Creek -influenced character along Del Rio Road to the west. This gateway is identified by accent paving and planting at the sidewalk bulb -outs. E: Montezuma Gateway Via Montezuma intersects Jefferson Avenue at the midpoint of a gentle bow to the west. This forms an important boundary between the Uptown Arts and Creekside Commercial Districts. This gateway is an important opportunity for wayfinding signage indicating the neighborhoods that lie to the west. F. Uptown Sports/ Transit District Gateways Located at the intersections of Jefferson Avenue and McCabe Court, Buecking Drive and Sanborn Avenue, these District gateways are easy to spot for visitors arriving by foot, bike or car. They face the future sports fields on the west side of Jefferson Avenue and reflect the vibrant, urban feel of the Uptown Center District just to the south. These gateways are marked by accent paving at the sidewalks and a change in street trees. Tertiary Gateways: G: Creekside Commercial Overlay Gateways Intersecting Jefferson Avenue at nearly the narrowest part of the District in the heart of the Creekside Commercial Overlay area, La Hacienda Street and Calle Cortez are gateways that communicate the proximity to Murrieta Creek which lies just to the west. Accent plant materials are native or naturalizing and signage and hardscape elements incorporate natural materials such as stone and weathering steel. H: Murrieta. Empire and San Gertrudis Creek Gateways The planned intersections of Winchester Road, Overland Drive and Via Montezuma (future pedestrian/ bike connection) with Diaz Road form important gateways to both the Murrieta Creek corridor as well as the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area beyond. This close proximity between Uptown Temecula and the Murrieta Creek corridor is communicated at these gateways through the use of native and riparian accent plant materials and district signage that uses natural materials that reflect that character of the local landscape. Empire and San Gertrudis Creeks are traversed by Jefferson Avenue. Riparian planting and/or public art or iconic elements should communicate this overlay of natural and built infrastructure. 20 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.4 Uptown Temecula Street Typologies Streets within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area have been classified as a Major District Connector, Minor District Connector, Neighborhood Street or Community Connector. These categories were determined based on street cross section, location and adjacent uses. 1 IV 14UU OUALG Street Typology Diagram 22 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Typical plans of specific streets can be found in Chapter 3, organized by District and street typology. These should be used to determine Guideline requirements. Additional detailed material descriptions and specifications can be found in the Appendix. Note, not all streets in a given classification will have the same material requirements. Major District Connector The Major District Connector street is Jefferson Avenue, nearly two miles long and Uptown Temecula's Main Street, threading through 4 Districts and connecting to Old Town to the south and Murrieta to the north. It is a major vehicular access route through the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area as well as a significant civic street. Its character changes slightly over its length as it moves through various Districts . The streetscape components are graphically bold and designed to be legible from vehicles as well as from a pedestrian -oriented perspective. i ar Minor District Connector These streets form the major circulation spines of each District and because of their length and scale, communicate the unique character of individual neighborhoods. Minor District Connector streets also include Winchester Road and Overland Drive which span the adjacent Interstate 15 and Murrieta Creek, connecting Uptown Temecula to the adjacent residential and commercial neighborhoods. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 23 Neiahborhood Street These streets are smaller scale, pedestrian -oriented and important for building the character of a particular neighborhood and providing a walkable network within the District. 24 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.5 Sidewalk Zones idewalks within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area are divided into four zones, two of which are in the public right of way and are the purview of these standards. In order to achieve adequate sidewalk width to accommodate pedestrian movement, all development projects shall be required to comply with the two sidewalk cross sections shown in the Specific Plan and illustrated below. These standards specifically address hardscape, planting and site furnishings within the pedestrian and utility zones. As described in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, the intent of the Streetscape Guidelines is to achieve a unified public realm that also accommodates unique project conditions and encourages a vibrant and eclectic public realm. The Frontage Zone provides opportunity for businesses and developments to incorporate furnishings, and entourage that reflect their unique character and the specific program needs of ground floor tenants. While site elements within the Frontage Zone are not included in the guidelines, this document provides recommendations and alternative scenarios for extending standard paving treatments described in these Sidewalk Standards to the Build -to Line in order to achieve a cohesive underlying fabric for the public realm. See conceptual scenarios and descriptions below. Public realm sidewalk paving within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area has been designed with a graphically strong but geometrically simple and flexible banded pattern in order to more easily accommodate project -specific components such as recessed entries, colonnades and accent paving. Required Sidewalk Cross Section, 1 Required Sidewalk Cross Section, 2 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 25 Sidewalk Frontage Zone Layouts Scenario 1 Shows a building with accent paving at its recessed entry threshold extending into the frontage zone creating an entry "carpet" of accent paving. The recessed entry and accent paving are well -coordinated with the public realm paving so that score joints are aligned. Note that accent paving could extend all the way to the property line, but should never extend into the pedestrian zone. • Align Building Openings / Recesses and Accent Paving with Sidewalk with Paving Score Joints Note: Sidewalk Paving Score Joints Width may be Adjusted to Align to Provide Equal Space Across Recess +/- 6" Per Panel OPRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ACCENT PAVING ODISTRICT STANDARD PAVING Scenario 2 Shows a building with accent paving at its entry threshold that stops at the "Build -to" Line. In this case, the recessed entry is not aligned with the score joint pattern of the public realm paving. The transition between the two is addressed with a flush band of paving that separates the two materials and patterns. This could be smooth concrete or a soldier band of unit pavers depending on the accent paving material. • Misaligned Building Openings / Recesses Provide Transitional Flush Curb at Back of Build -to -Line OPRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ACCENT PAVING ODISTRICT STANDARD PAVING OFLUSH CURB Furnishings Pedestrian Utility Zone Zone Zone 9.5' 6' 4' 6" . R.O.W. 10 1/16" = V SCALE Furnishings Pedestrian Utility Zone Zone Zone 9.5' 6' 4' 6" u 4 R.O.W.- 1/16" = 1' SCALE 26 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Sidewalk Frontage Zone Layouts Scenarios 3 + 4 Scenarios 3 and 4 show buildings with colonnades or similar extension into the frontage zone. In each case, accent paving, columns and public realm paving, while not perfectly aligned, are adjusted and coordinated to minimize visual disruption of the unified public realm paving. SCENARIO 3 • Align Columns /Accent Paving with Sidewalk Paving Score Joints OPRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ACCENT PAVING ODISTRICT STANDARD PAVING SCENARIO 4 • Misaligned Columns / Accent Paving • Provide Transitional Flush Curb to align with R.O.W. Align + / or Sidewalk Score Joints OPRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ACCENT PAVING ODISTRICT STANDARD PAVING Frontage Pedestrian Furnishing Zone Zone Zone 9.5' 6' 4' 6" COLUMN COLUMN . R.O.W. 10 1/16" = 1' SCALE Frontage Pedestrian Furnishing Zone Zone Zone 9.5' 6' 4' 6" it COLUMN COLUMN - R.O.W. No 1/16" = 1' SCALE Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 27 2.6 Enhanced Intersections and Bulb -outs In addition to the framework for sidewalk zones described in Section 2.5 above, the Specific Plan also calls for enhanced intersections and bulb -outs to be located at key intersections throughout the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area and the Uptown Specific Plan Street Cross Sections should be referenced for locations. The bulb -outs serve several functions including enhancing pedestrian safety by slowing traffic and reducing the length of crosswalks; providing space for wayfinding elements such as accent trees, signage and gateway elements; creating pocket plazas for seating and pedestrian comfort. This document identifies key locations for enhanced intersections and bulb -outs; the final locations will be determined by the City in concert with future development. Note many bulb -out locations align with the Gateways as identified in Section 2.3, Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Gateways. Indeed the hardscape and planting treatments of these bulb -outs, intersections and crosswalks work together to reinforce neighborhood identity. Enhanced Intersection with accent planting Required Sidewalk Cross Section, 3 Bulb -Out with accent paving and crosswalks Intersection with signage All enhanced intersection and bulb -out designs are illustrated in Section 3.0 Design Standards which outlines the materials and design to be implemented per District. The City of Temecula Engineering and Construction Manual should also be referenced for all horizontal and vertical configurations, vision triangle clearances, setbacks and other design parameters associated with the enhanced intersection and bulb -out design. 28 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 29 2.7 Uptown Temecula Hardscape Framework Each street typology, enhanced intersection and bulb -out within the Temecula Specific Plan as described in Sections 2.4 and 2.6 have associated hardscape materials and layouts. LEGEND Major District Connector A ■ Major District Connector B ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Major District Connector C Minor District Connector Neighborhood Street OPrimary Gateway OSecondary Gateway OTertiary Gateway ^^ Creek <.............. Drainage Channel ______ Future Street T N 1400 SCALE Street Typology Diagram 30 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards his document outlines a family of hardscape paving materials and score joint patterns that provide a harmonious and consistent streetscape while allowing flexibility to highlight accent areas of interest. Specified materials for public sidewalk include integral color concrete with contrasting finishes, precast concrete unit pavers in utility furnishing zones and enhanced asphalt at pedestrian crosswalks. Chapter 3 includes typical layout plans with material descriptions, organized by District and street typology. Paving layout and materials are designed with a graphically strong but geometrically simple and flexible banded pattern in order to facilitate implementation over time, support projects with a wide range of architectural character and accommodate site specific components adjacent to the public realm such as building projections and site walls. Reference Section 2.6 for the Street Typology and the Temecula Specific Plan for all bulb -out locations. In addition to standard paving treatments, this document identifies accent areas that might include special inset paving related to building entries or cafe zones (as described in Section 2.5) or enhanced paving or public art at neighborhood gateways (as described in Section 2.3). Specific design for these accent paving treatments will be defined in concert with future development in support of the District characteristics defined in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 31 2.8 Uptown Temecula Street Trees and Understory Planting Street Tree Diagram 32 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Street trees throughout the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area reinforce community character, improve air quality, sequester carbon, improve storm water treatment and collection, increase storm water uptake and filtration, reduce the urban heat island effect, reduce electricity and shade requirements and other sustainable features. A sustainable urban forest utilizes a variety of trees for increased disease resistance and a diversity of ecosystems. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area Street Tree and understory plant species are organized to reinforce the character of the various Districts. Species pull from a range of contextual influences including the riparian trees and grasses of Murrieta Creek; the native trees and understory planting of the surrounding Wilder Hills; the character of Temecula agricultural and wine regions as well as the sophisticated urban character of the Promenade Temecula. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area Street Tree framework reinforces the unique character of districts and Overlay areas while allowing a level of flexibility and resiliency to the urban canopy by providing a healthy mix of species. Chapter 3 includes detailed description of plant materials and locations. New trees to be installed shall have a minimum box size of 36". Healthy soil conditions shall be created through excavation and soil remediation and amendments. Each tree shall have a minimum root zone of 40 square feet and 36" depth per tree. District standard tree grates and tree wells are sized to achieve this minimum root zone. The Large Canopy trees associated with the Major District Connector B Street Typology will utilize Silva Cell units to ensure prolonged tree healthy and structural support within these areas. Refer to Section 2.4 for the Street Typology locations and to Section 4.0 for the Silva Cell product information. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 33 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.0 Design Standards ■ 37 3.1 Layout Plans and Materials by District 39 3.1.1 Uptown Center District 39 3.1.2 Uptown Hotel / Tourism District 49 3.1.3 Uptown Sports / Transit District 61 3.1.4 Uptown Arts District 75 3.1.5 Creekside Village District 81 3.1.6 Gateways: Enhanced Intersections and Bulb -Outs. all Districts 89 3.2 Site Materials 3.2.1 Street Lights 118 3.2.2 Tree Grates 1 18 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting 120 120 3.3 Additional Site Elements 121 3.3.1 Site Furnishings 121 3.3.2 Utilities and Equipment in the ROW 121 3.3.3 Bus Shleters 121 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS n order ensure a consistent public realm that unifies the many different developments and Districts within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, the Sidewalk Standards document defines materials and layout for key streetscape site elements. Each District is organized around a hierarchy of street typologies. Generally the Minor District Connector street serves as an individual District's organizing spine or Main Street, with Neighborhood Streets providing a walkable connective network. This Chapter includes typical layout plans, organized by District and Street Typology. Layout plans indicate design intent for street tree spacing, hardscape finishes, score joint layout, relationship of hardscape to planting areas, street trees, lighting and other appurtenances. The plans also indicate materials and layout for specific site elements including hardscape, planting and site furnishings. In addition to core framework elements captured by typical layout plans, this chapter includes descriptive guidelines of streetscape components and special conditions including site utilities, public art and wayfinding signage and street lighting. Note that materials and configurations, particularly street trees and understory planting will vary from District to District. Refer to Chapter 2 for overall Street Typology, Hardscape and Street Tree Framework diagrams for relationship of individual Districts and streets to the overall Specific Plan area organization. Additional materials information and specifications can be found in Chapter 4 Appendix. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 37 3.1.1 Uptown Center District Major District Connector A Jefferson Avenue Major District Connector C Jefferson Avenue Minor District Connector Winchester Road Overland Drive Neighborhood Street Future Proposed See Street Typologies 22 Diagram page v N.T.S. 40 42 44 46 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 39 Major District Connector A Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6„ 6' 4' 6„ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I �����IIIIII�/// ■ '��� IIIIIIiv/ ■ ■ ■ ■ IR .. ``' III\N.: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 4 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ n ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ALIGN ■ ■ ■ I I f 11116 Oi ■ ■ ■ I I /ire//,����� ������ '/illllll III �///llllll� 5 ■ 6 ■ ■w iZ Iw Z ■ J ■O ■� ■ J ■m J I� W � O IL R.O.W. Plan Layout SP KEY PLAN STREETS Jefferson Avenue i N.T.S. LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4' X 10' Tree Grate @ 30' O.C. Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers © 6" Vehicular Curb Q7 Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.C. Notes: • See 132 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 132 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 126 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 40 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Major District Connector A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Street Tree: Fern Pine, Podocarpus gracilior Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Tree Grate: Neenah 4' x10' R-8815-b Materials Street Light: Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 41 Major District Connector C Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6„ 6' 4' 6„ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ O■ 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i ■ O ■ 5 ■ ■ ■ ALIGN R.O.W. KEY PLAN STREETS Jefferson Avenue Plan Layout SP N.T.S. LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. Q2 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 0 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 O 4"x16" Concrete Pavers © 6" Vehicular Curb 0 Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120' 0" O.C. Notes: • See 132 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 132 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 126 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 42 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Major District Connector C HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS .'S Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish PLANTING Street Tree: Fern Pine, Podocarpus gracilior Materials Pre -cast Concrete Street Light: Pavers: Vehicular and Pedestrian 4"X16" Acker -Stone LED Light w/Banner Kit Warm Earth Tone Blend Understory Planting (single species per block): Blue Grama Grass, Atlas Fescue, Bouteloua `Blonde Festuca mairei Ambition' Accent Planting (Species mixed into understory planting): Naked Ladies, Amaryllis belladonna Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 43 Minor District Connector Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6„ KEY PLAN STREETS Winchester Road Overland Drive LEGEND Plan Layout SP N.T.S. 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 0 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb t'J Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 132 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 132 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 126 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. IK.UM PI SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 44 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Minor District Connector HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Pedestrian Light: Pedestrian LED Light PLANTING Street Tree: Brisbane Box, Lophostemon confertus Materials Understory Planting (single species per block): Variegated Dietes, White Flowering Dwarf Coast Dietes `Variegata' Rose, Rosa `Ice Rosemary, Westringia f. 'Morning Light' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 45 Neighborhood Street Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6„ 6' 4' 6„ i I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i J � ■ I ■ I ■ ■ ■ yi ■ ALIGN ■ ■ ■ I ■ I ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ I ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ I ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■W IW IJ ■J I ry ip IW R.O.W. !L H KEY PLAN STREETS Plan Layout SP N.T.S. See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. Q2 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 0 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb 05 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 132 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 132 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 126 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 46 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Neighborhood Street HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS K K I Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING T Mum. ! Pedestrian Light: Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit East / West Street Tree: Marina Madrone, Arbutus x 'Marina' Materials Understory Planting (single species per block): Variegated Dietes, White Flowering Dwarf Coast Dietes 'Variegata' Rose, Rosa 'Ice Rosemary, Cap' Westringia f. 'Morning Light' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 47 3.1.2 Uptown Hotel / Tourism District Major District Connector A Jefferson Avenue Major District Connector B East Jefferson Avenue 50 52 Major District Connector B Allee 54 Jefferson Avenue Neighborhood Street 56 Future Proposed See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 Entry Median Jefferson Avenue 58 N.T.S. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 49 Major District Connector A Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb y 9'-6„ 6' 4' 6„ Imo-R.O.W. Plan Layout 1 KEY PLAN N.T.S. STREETS Jefferson Avenue LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. Q2 4' X 10' Tree Grate @ 30' O.C. Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers © 6" Vehicular Curb Q7 Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.C. Notes: • See 134 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 134 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 50 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Major District Connector A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS I Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Street Tree: Fern Pine, Podocarpus gracilior \V Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Tree Grate: Neenah 4' x10' R-8815-b Materials Street Light: Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 51 Major District Connector B East Furnishings Pedestrian Frontage Curb Zone Zone Zone 6„ 4' 6' 9,_6„ z_ 73 b O � ALIGN ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ W I - i C ■ J F ■ � ■ 0 ■ � I w Di � r ■ 0 zi m■ R.O.W. KEY PLAN STREETS Jefferson Avenue (East) Plan Layout \/ �m / N.T.S. LEGEND 0 Street Tree at 30' - 0" O.C. 0 4' wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 0 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 6" Vehicular Curb © Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at X' - X" O.C. 0 Electrical Stub -out for Future Street Tree Accent Lighting ® 5' wide Pedestrian Pathway for On - Street Parking at 30'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 134 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 134 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 52 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Major District Connector B East HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Street Tree: California Sycamore, Platanus racemosa Understory Planting: 1 Pre -cast Concrete Street Light: Pavers: Vehicular and Pedestrian 4"X16" Acker -Stone LED Light w/Banner Kit Warm Earth Tone Blend Street Tree Support: Silva Cell Blue Grama Grass, Blue Flax Lily, Fountain Grass, Bouteloua `Blonde Dianella revoluta Pennisetum `Bunny Ambition' `Little Rev' Tails' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 53 Major District Connector B Allee Creekside Zone +/- 4' 3 0 m c `o U � Murrieta Streetscape Creekside Improvements Improvements Pedestrian Zone Varies 10-16' Furnishings Zone Curb 4' 6„ Plan Layout STREETS Jefferson Avenue (West) LEGEND 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. Q2 Allee Tree at 30'-0" O.C. Q3 4' wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 4 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 © 6" Vehicular Curb O7 Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.C. ® Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Og 4'-0" to 6'-0" Boulders 10 Electrical Stub -out for Future Street Tree and Allee Tree Accent Lighting 11 5 wide Pedestrian Pathway for On - Street Parking at 30'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 134 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 134 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 54 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Major District Connector B Allee HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS i Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish PLANTING Street and Allee Tree: California Sycamore, Platanus racemosa Understory Planting: Street Light: Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit 1 ' Pedestrian Light: Pedestrian LED Light �ii ii 11 � li Street Tree and Allee Tree Support: Silva Cell Blue Grama Grass, Blue Flax Lily, Fountain Grass, Bouteloua `Blonde Dianella revoluta Pennisetum `Bunny Ambition' `Little Rev' Tails' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 55 Neighborhood Street Frontage Zone Pedestrian Furnishings Curb Zone Zone 6' 4' 6, Z 0 0 ■ ■ ■ ■w I ■Z Z ■ } i0 I'ry- �0 IW ■ J ■� O 111 ■m a R.O.W. KEY PLAN Plan Layout Y�7 N.T.S. STREETS See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb O5 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 134 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 134 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 56 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Neighborhood Street HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS I Pedestrian Light Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit PLANTING North / South Street Tree: East / West Street Tree: Natchez Crape Myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica Marina Madrone, Arbutus x 'Marina' 'Natchez' Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street): Creeping Stoke's Dward Dwarf Myrtle, Dwarf Yedda Comprosma, Yaupon Holly, Ilex Myrtus communis Hawthorn, Comprosma petriei vomitoria 'Stoke's 'Compacta' Rhaphiolepis 'Verde Vista' Dwarf' umbellata 'Minor' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 57 Entry Median Maintenance Planting Maintenance Curb path Zone Path Curb y 6" 16" 12-16' 16" 6» 0 0 N Plan Layout 1 KEY PLAN N.T.S. STREETS Jefferson Avenue LEGEND 0 Median Tree at 20'-0" O.C. 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers 0 6" Vehicular Curb ® 12'-16' Wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting 0 Median Tree Accent Uplighting Notes: • See 135 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 135 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 58 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Entry Median HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS /'ZZ Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend PLANTING Accent Uplighting: LED Uplight 2 per Tree Materials Understory Planting: Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus Coprosma petriei belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' 'Verde Vista' Lilac Blooming Salvia, Salvia x Median Tree: 'Heatwave Glitter Oklahoma Western Redbud, Cercis canadensis Sage' 'Oklahoma' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 59 3.1.3 Uptown Sports / Transit District Major District Connector B East Jefferson Avenue Major District Connector B Allee Jefferson Avenue Minor District Connector Madison Avenue 62 64 66 Neighborhood Street 68 Future Proposed See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 Entry Median 70 Jefferson Avenue Minor District Connector Median N.T.S. Madison Avenue Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 61 Major District Connector B East Furnishings Pedestrian Frontage Curb Zone Zone Zone 6„ 4' 6' 9,_6„ v ■ ALIGN ■ I i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Z ■ � I ■ ■ O ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ � I ■ ■ ■ ® ALIGN ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I -i w Z 00 ■ C ■ F■ ■ � Of I Oi 0_ r ■ O ■ IGN a m a 4 R.O.W. Plan Layout KEY PLAN STREETS Jefferson Avenue (East) LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4' wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 O5 6" Vehicular Curb © Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.C. O7 Electrical Stub -out for Future Street Tree Accent Lighting ® 5' wide Pedestrian Pathway for On - Street Parking at 30'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 135 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 135 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 62 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Major District Connector B East HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS J i .'S ,I 4 Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish PLANTING Street Tree: California Sycamore, Platanus racemosa Understory Planting: t 1 M Pre -cast Concrete Street Light: Pavers: Vehicular and Pedestrian 4"X16" Acker -Stone LED Light w/Banner Kit Warm Earth Tone Blend Street Tree Support: Silva Cell Blue Grama Grass, Blue Flax Lily, Fountain Grass, Bouteloua 'Blonde Dianella revoluta Pennisetum 'Bunny Ambition' 'Little Rev' Tails' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 63 Major District Connector B Allee t :rPakcidP. Pf-OP.Orinn Murrieta Streetscape Creekside Improvements Improvements Furnichinnc Plan Layout Notes: • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 64 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Major District Connector B Allee HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Street and Allee Tree: California Sycamore, Platanus racemosa Understory Planting: ie Street Tree and Allee Tree Support: Silva Cell 1 1 Street Light: Pedestrian Light: Vehicular and Pedestrian Pedestrian LED Light LED Light w/ Banner Kit Blue Gama Grass, Blue Flax Lily, Pennisetum 'Bunny Bouteloua 'Blonde Dianella revoluta Tales' Ambition' 'Little Rev' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 65 Minor District Connector Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6„ IMU.VV. I Plan Layout KEY PLAN N.T.S. STREETS Madison Avenue LEGEND 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 0 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb t'J Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend • See xx for Furnishings Zone Example Treatments SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 66 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Minor District Connector HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Pedestrian Light: Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit PLANTING Street Tree: Brisbane Box, Lophostemon confertus Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street): Variegated Dietes, Fountain Dietes 'Variegata' Grass, Pennisetum 'Bunny Tales' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 67 Neighborhood Street Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6„ 6' 4' 6„ ■ ■ ■ yi ■ ALIGN ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■W IW I ■ J J I ry ip IW IL ■ J_ I0� ■� ■m A a- R.O.W. H KEY PLAN STREETS Plan Layout N.T.S. See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb Q5 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 68 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Neighborhood Street HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS I g 'ati Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING North / South Street Tree: East / West Street Tree: Natchez Crape Myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica Marina Madrone, Arbutus x 'Marina' 'Natchez' Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street): Variegated Dietes, Fountain Grass, Dietes 'Variegata' Pennisetum 'Bunny Tales' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 69 Entry Median Maintenance Planting Maintenance Curb Path Zone Path Curb 6" 16" 12-16' 16" 6» KEY PLAN o STREETS oJefferson Avenue N LEGEND Plan Layout 0 Median Tree at 20'-0" O.C. 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers 0 6" Vehicular Curb ® 12'-16' Wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting 0 Median Tree Accent Uplights Notes: • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 70 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Entry Median HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend PLANTING i 1 Accent Uplighting: LED Uplights 2 per tree Materials Understory Planting: Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus Coprosma petriei belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' 'Verde Vista' Lilac Blooming Salvia, Salvia x Median Tree: 'Heatwave Glitter Oklahoma Western Redbud, Cercis canadensis Sage' `Oklahoma' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 71 Minor District Connector Median Maintenance Planting Maintenance Curb Path Zone Path Curb 6" 16" 12-16' 16" 6» KEY PLAN STREETS 0 oJefferson Avenue N LEGEND Plan Layout 0 Median Tree at 20'-0" O.C. 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers 0 6" Vehicular Curb ® 12'-16' Wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting 0 Median Tree Accent Uplights Notes: • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 72 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Minor District Connector Median HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS /'ZZ Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend PLANTING Accent Uplighting LED Uplights 2 per Tree Median Tree: Oklahoma Western Redbud, Cercis canadensis 'Oklahoma' Materials Understory Planting: Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Variegated Dietes, Fountain Grass, Rose, Cistus x Coprosma petriei Dietes 'Variegata' Pennisetum `Bunny hybridus 'Verde Vista' Tails' White Flowering Dwarf Coast Rose, Rosa 'Ice Rosemary, Cap' Westringia L 'Morning Light' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 73 3.1.4 Uptown Arts District Minor District Connector Del Rio Rd Extension Enterprise Circle Commerce Center Drive Neighborhood Street Future Proposed See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 v N.T.S. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 75 Minor District Connector Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6„ ■ ■ ■ vl ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ e ■ ■ ■ I I ' 1 ■ 2 ■ . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I 5 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 3 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 4 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ e ■ ■ ■ ■ ALIGN ■ ■w ■ z I uJ z ■ ■p i~ J I I w ■_ ■J I O nn Of ■m /1 d R.O.W. 75 O O Plan Layout KEY PLAN N.T.S. STREETS Del Rio Road Extension Enterprise Circle (West + North) Commerce Center Drive LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb O Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 137 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 137 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 129 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 76 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Minor District Connector HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS id ati 1 Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING Street Tree: African Sumac, Rhus lancea Materials Understory Planting (Select one plant pairing below, use on both sides of street per block; arrange in natural groupings): Plant Pairing 1 Salvia leucantha Autumn Moor 'Santa Barbara' Grass, Sesleria autumnalis Plant Pairing 3 Atlas Fescue, Blackfoot Daisy, Festuca mairei Melampodium leucanthum Plant Pairing 2 Atlas Fescue, Verbena lilacina 'De Festuca mairei La Mina' Plant Pairing 4 California Wild Autumn Moor Rose, Rosa Grass, Sesleria californica autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 77 Neighborhood Street Frontage Zone Pedestrian Furnishings Curb Zone Zone 6' 4' 6. ■ ■ ■ 2 ■ I i I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ inl ■ ■ ■ ALIGN Z I o I I o Plan Layout KEY PLAN N.T.S. STREETS See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) \ \ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 I ® 6" Vehicular Curb O5 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. I I N I n' � I w z Notes: �' J • See 138 for Hardscape Materials Legend } • See 138 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 129 for Plant Material Legend I w • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a a- 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula a Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" R.O.W. 78 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Neighborhood Street HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS K K I Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Pedestrian Light: Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit North / South Street Tree: Natchez Crape Myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica 'Natchez' East / West Street Tree: Marina Madrone. Arbutus x 'Marina' Understory Planting (Select one plant pairing below, use on both sides of street per block; arrange in natural groupings): Plant Pairing 1 Plant Pairing 2 Plant Pairing 3 � tvtr A", Salvia Autumn Moor Atlas Fescue, Verbena Atlas Fescue, Blackfoot leucantha Grass, Sesleria Festuca mairei lilacina 'De La Festuca mairei Daisy, 'Santa autumnalis Mina' Melampodium Barbara' leucanthum Materials Plant Pairing 4 �1 v California Wild Autumn Moor Rose, Rosa Grass, Sesleria californica autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 79 3.1.5 Creekside Villaqe District N.T.S. Major District Connector C 82 Jefferson Avenue Minor District Connector Del Rio Rd Commerce Center Drive Extension Neighborhood Street 86 Future Proposed See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 ti Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 81 Major District Connector C Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6„ 6' 4' 6„ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ O■ 1 i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i ■ O ■ ■ 5 • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■w ■z J • ■- i0 !m KEY PLAN STREETS Jefferson Avenue Plan Layout N.T.S. LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 O 4"x16" Concrete Pavers © 6" Vehicular Curb ALIGN Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.C. R.O.W. Notes: • See 139 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 139 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 130 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 82 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Major District Connector C HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Materials i h." Concrete Type 2: Pre -cast Concrete Davis Color Mesa Buff Pavers: Exposed Aggregate 4"X16" Acker -Stone Finish Warm Earth Tone Blend Street Tree: Fern Pine, Podocarpus gracilior JAL Street Light: Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit Understory Planting (single species per block): Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Atlas Fescue, Amaryllis Bouteloua 'Blonde Festuca mairei belladonna Ambition' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 83 Minor District Connector Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6„ 6' 4' 6„ I�K.UM Plan Layout KEY PLAN N.T.S. STREETS Del Rio Road Commerce Center Drive Extension LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb O Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 139 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 139 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 130 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 84 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Minor District Connector HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Materials Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING Street Tree: African Sumac. Rhus lancea Understory Planting (single species per block): Blue Gama Grass, Fountain Grass, Autumn Moor Bouteloua 'Blonde Pennisetum `Bunny Grass, Sesleria Ambition' Tails' autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 85 Neighborhood Street Frontage Zone Pedestrian Furnishings Curb Zone Zone 6' .. 4' 6. ALIGN ■ ■ ■ ■w I ■z z ■ 0 b ■0 Iw ■ J IL O ■� rr I ■ ■ 0° AIl 4 R.O.W. z 0 0 o_ H Plan Layout KEY PLAN N.T.S. STREETS See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. Q2 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb 05 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 139 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 139 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 130 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 86 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Neighborhood Street HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Materials Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING Street Tree: Marina Madrone, Arbutus x 'Marina' Understory Planting (single species per block): Blue Gama Grass, Fountain Grass, Autumn Moor Bouteloua 'Blonde Pennisetum `Bunny Grass, Sesleria Ambition' Tails' autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 87 3.1.6 Gateways: Enhanced Intersections and Bulb -Outs, all Districts nhanced intersections are required at all intersecting streets and some of these locations are associated with bulb -outs. Reference the Uptown Specific Plan Street Cross Sections for intersection and bulb -out locations and the City of Temecula Standard Drawing Numbers 402, 603A and 000 for curb, ramp and bulb -out configurations which can also be found in the Section 4.0 of this document. OPrimary Gateway 90 OSecondary Gateway A 94 Secondary Gateway B 10 O Tertiary Gateway A 10 Tertiary Gateway B 10 O Non Gateway A 10 All Remaining Intersections �i Creek `.............. Drainage Channel Future Street T N 1400 SCALE Enhanced Intersection and Gateway Diagram Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 89 Primary Gateway INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Winchester Rd Jefferson Avenue + Overland Drive 0 ry O O o U � w o z z O U Q U_ ry H 0 ry O Q � X W z_ J Iry uu 0- 0 Plan Layout MINOR DISTRICT CONNECTOR LEGEND i 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 5 0 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ® 4"x16" Concrete Pavers O 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete Type 1 © 6" Vehicular Curb 0 Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula Standard No. 402 O.W. Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" wide White Border 09 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) i 10 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) W z Notes: J �O • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend 17 •See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend �r-) J �m SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 90 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Primary Gateway HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS i .'S 14 Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Materials Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Pavers: Crosswalk: 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 91 Primary Gateway INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Cherry Street Jefferson Avenue + Rancho California Plan Layout EXISTING STREET PER CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARD 8 i 0 i I wQ ® 5 U p Z Z aQ 6 o' �- w�.... ........................ -ia 9 LEGEND �w z Q ~ 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. / E0 5 i o >- Q2 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 �U 0 > O 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ® 4"x16" Concrete Pavers 1 � O 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete Type 1 © 6" Vehicular Curb 0 Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula + xStandard No. 402 o R.O.W. � ® Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" � wide White Border 0 0 w o O9 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) z z O 10 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) Qw �w z Notes: ry J • See 137 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 137 for Site Furnishings Legend o L n 0 �J O 0 D SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 92 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Primary Gateway HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Ad Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Pre -cast Concrete Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Pavers: Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate 4"X16" Acker -Stone Finish Warm Earth Tone Blend Stamped Asphalt Crosswalk: "Tile" Pattern Paving Products, Cable Stamp Color: Natural Cement Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 93 Secondary Gateway A INTERSECTIONS South Corner of Jefferson t Avenue + Via Montezuma it South Corner of Jefferson + Avenue + Del Rio Road I Of a- p 10 Of , wQ 00 0 zz QQ Q U) w O Q p J Q J U OJ �p<CD �� H_Ur-) JU (�wZ O� :�iQO z w of LLI Q~ it L� n �o z� O ~ U50 ry O U W Z Z O U Q U ry H 0 ry O Q 1 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 e O Plan Layout NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 10' — 0' i I G LEGEND ■ 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. ■ 0 6 Q2 Planting Area with Understory Planting ■ ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ ® ■ ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ O 4"x16" Concrete Pavers ■ ■ © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ Type 1 ■ ■ O7 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula R.O.W. Standard No. 402 ■ ■ 0 Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" ■ wide White Border ■ ■ ■ 10 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) LU z W ■ J z 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) 0 Notes: ■ • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend JO See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend ■ • See 126 for Plant Material Legend m ■ ■ ■ SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 94 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Secondary Gateway A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS a .'S Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Pavers: Crosswalk: 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement PLANTING Understory Planting (Combination of 3 species): Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Lilac Blooming Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus Coprosma petriei Salvia, Salvia x belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' 'Verde Vista' 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 95 Secondary Gateway A INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Sanborn Avenue 11 0 000 00 0000 goo Q >> \ Plan Layout NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 10' — 0' 5 6 (� LLJ p 10 Ld Q 00 0 Z z Q Q r7 Q (n LL 2 LJ J Q 0<0 0 -1� -1U O < C) U 0 U - ■ 0 w C' � Q o - LEGEND Q ~ ofLd�z ~ �' ■ 0—1 a_ 11 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. �0 ■ zo 1-- 0 6 Q2 Planting Area with Understory Planting U50 o I ■ > o 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® ■ ■ ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ O 4"x16" Concrete Pavers 1 ■ ■ © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ ■ Type 1 ■ + O7 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula R.O.W. Standard No. 402 Cj 1■ 0 v 0 ■ 0 Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" 0 wide White Border Lu z 0 ■ 0 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) m LLJ10 Z z ? ■ 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) v } ; Notes: • See 137 for Hardscape Materials Legend p LU 0 ■ See 137 for Site Furnishings Legend rO • See 129 for Plant Material Legend Q + O m + ■ 2 ■ SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 96 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Secondary Gateway A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS a .'S Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Pavers: Crosswalk: 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement PLANTING Understory Planting (Combination of 3 species): Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Lilac Blooming Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus Coprosma petriei Salvia, Salvia x belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' 'Verde Vista' 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 97 Secondary Gateway A INTERSECTIONS North Corner of Jefferson Avenue + Via Montezuma North Corner of Jefferson Avenue +Del Rio Road — �J Of a- p 10 Ld Q 00 0 zz QQ rr, �-- QU LLJ 0 < 0 J Q 0 J U �U�U LJ� JU ()LdZ < 0 :5 z ~w w � C/1) Q �0 1 z� 0 U 7) 5; ry O U w Z Z O U U F- U H 0 O Q Plan Layout 11 NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 10' - 0' I 6 0 2 ■ ■ I ■ ■ LEGEND ■ 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. O 6 ■ Q2 Planting Area with Understory Planting 0 0 ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 I ■ ® ■ ■ ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ O 4"x16" Concrete Pavers 1 ■ ■ © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ ■ Type 1 ■ O7 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ■ R.O.W. ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula Standard No. 402 0 I ■ ■ ■ 0 Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" I wide White Border 0 ■ 10 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) LU z W Z ■ ■ ■ 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) J � J ■ 0 Notes: ■ • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend LLJ 0 • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend ■ • See 127 for Plant Material Legend m ■ ■ ■ SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 98 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Secondary Gateway A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS a .'S Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Pavers: Crosswalk: 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement PLANTING Understory Planting (Combination of 3 species): Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Lilac Blooming Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus Coprosma petriei Salvia, Salvia x belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' 'Verde Vista' 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 99 Secondary Gateway B INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Buecking Drive QQ �I-- QU Ld 0Q�C) JQ U—i Q0 D U �_ U O 1 Zw U W z ~ ofWQO Ld Q L �o z� oU 1 IW O H U Lu z z O U m U H 0 O Q U O 0 0 I ro U J Plan Layout NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 10' — 0' H ■ ■ ■ ■ IL LEGEND ■ 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 6 ■ Q2 Planting Area with Understory Planting ■ ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ® ■ ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ � O 4"x16" Concrete Pavers ■ © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ Type 1 ■ ■ O7 6" Vehicular Curb ■ LR.OXV. ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula Standard No. 000 ■ i 0 Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" ■ wide White Border ■ ■ ■ 10 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) ■ LLJ z LLJ Z ■ ■ 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) 0 Notes: H ■ • See 137 for Hardscape Materials Legend w a 0 ■ •See 137 for Site Furnishings Legend 0 • See 129 for Plant Material Legend m ■ ■ ■ SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 100 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Secondary Gateway B HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS a .'S Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Pavers: Crosswalk: 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement PLANTING Understory Planting (Combination of 3 to 5 species): Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Lilac Blooming Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus Coprosma petriei Salvia, Salvia x belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' 'Verde Vista' 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 101 Secondary Gateway B INTERSECTIONS Winchester Road + Commerce Center Overland Drive + Commerce Center Via Montezuma + Commerce Center 0 Plan Layout 4 MINOR DISTRICT CONNECTOR 10'-0' ® 0 6 3 Li u u a I z < Q Q U) w �a 0<C o ■ ■ U? U000 ■ � Q o LEGEND zw Q a'wIz ~ ■ L, 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. �o ■ o � O 6 Q2 Planting Area with Understory Planting U-) U I ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 o � ■ ® ■ ■ ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 O 4"x16" Concrete Pavers 1 ■ © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ Type 1 ■ + 07 6" Vehicular Curb — ■ ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula R.O.W. Standard No. 000 o � ■ i 0 Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" 0 i wide White Border w z o ■ ■ 10 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) z O Z w z ■ ■ 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) U J 0 Notes: H H ■ • See 138 for Hardscape Materials Legend p W 0 See 138 for Site Furnishings Legend ry ■ • See 130 for Plant Material Legend Oz + + m i 2 ■ SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 102 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Secondary Gateway B HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS a .'S Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Pavers: Crosswalk: 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement PLANTING Understory Planting (Combination of 3 to 5 species): Atlas Fescue, Iris douglasiana Rosmarinus o. Salvia leucantha Santolina Festuca mairei 'Huntington Carpet' 'Santa Barbara' chamaecyparissus 'Nana' Materials Autumn Moor Grass, Sesleria autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 103 Tertiary Gateway A INTERSECTIONS Winchester Road + Diaz Road Overland Drive + Diaz Road 7—F4 -- wQ U p Z Z Q Q r Q (n W J Q U J D L U --- 01 --- zw Q~ �O o zoo � �0 0 :: ry o 0 0 U � LLJ z z 0 U H U fy H 0 ry O z 2 Plan Layout EXISTING STREET PER CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARD 8 10 ti Q 0 0 i R.O.W. LU z J w �z � — � J � ry -- ;o uJ Io 0 5 LEGEND 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 0 Not Used ® 4"x16" Concrete Pavers O 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete Type 1 © 6" Vehicular Curb 0 Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula Standard No. 402 ® Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" wide White Border Q B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) 10 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) Notes: • See 138 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 138 for Site Furnishings Legend SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 104 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Tertiary Gateway A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS g A; I Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Materials 1 Stamped Asphalt Crosswalk: "Tile" Pattern Paving Products, Cable Stamp Color: Natural Cement Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 105 Tertiary Gateway B INTERSECTIONS — Jefferson Avenue + Las Hacienda Street Jefferson Avenue + Calle Cortez Q I I C3 0 0 0 I n Plan Layout NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 10' - 0' ■ ■ ■ ■ i LEGEND ■ 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. ■ 0 6 0 Not Used ■ ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ ® ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ O 4"x16" Concrete Pavers ■ ■ I © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ Type 1 ■ O7 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula R.O.W. Standard No. 402 ■ ■ 0 Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" ■ wide White Border ■ ■ ■ 10 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) ■ w ■ z_ ■ 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) J � ■ I Notes: O ■ . See 140 for Hardscape Materials Legend 0 • See 140 for Site Furnishings Legend m ■ ■ ■ SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 106 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Tertiary Gateway B HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS a .'S Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Materials Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Pavers: Crosswalk: 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 107 Non Gateway A Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS © MAJOR DISTRICT A CONNECTOR Jefferson Avenue + Various i Neighborhood Streets 11 10'-0' J) $ 00000 0000 000 5 2 Li O wQ U O Z Z Q Q ro QLi (n L� ■ J Q 0 0 0 0 J 0' ■ ■ U O �_ U p �O ■ J1:2 U Z W U W Z W Q I ■ Q ~ of Li ■ ■ o LEGEND ■ zo 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. o I ■ I o I 0 Q2 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ ■ ® 6" Vehicular Curb 1 ■ ■ ■ O Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula ■ Standard No. 402 ■ + i © City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk ■ i Q B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) U o o ■ i R.O.W. �■ ■ ® E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) ■ o r7 ■ ■ ■ w ■ W ■ ry I ■ 1-- co W W ■ z I z ■ o O - J J ■ p n ■ Notes: H • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend m + • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend + 0 I ■ Z I _ ! SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 108 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Non Gateway A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS a .e � y _ Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 109 Non Gateway A Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Various Neighborhood Streets © 00000 0000 00 5 0 $ 2 MAJOR DISTRICT B CONNECTOR 10'-0' r Li I I o O ® O� wQ U O Z Z Q Q ro QL'i (n L� ■ J Q 0 0 0 0 J 0' ■ ■ U O �_ U p �O ■ J U ZW U LiZ I ■ Q~ �LLJQ wI--(n ■ ■ o LEGEND ■ zo 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. o I ■ _ oI I 0 Q2 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ ■ ® 6" Vehicular Curb 1 ■ ■ ■ O Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula ■ Standard No. 402 ■ + i © City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk ■ i Q B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) U o ■ ® E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) o 14 R.O.W. --f■ ■ ■ o r7 ■ ■ ■ H w ■ � ■ CO w W ■ Z z ■ o O - J J ■ p n ■ Notes: H • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend m + • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend + 0 I ■ Z I _ ! SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 110 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Non Gateway A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS i .e � y _ Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards ill Non Gateway A Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS © MAJOR DISTRICT C CONNECTOR Jefferson Avenue + Various Neighborhood Streets 11 I 10'-0' 8 00000 0000 000 5 2 -------------- Li O wQ U O zz Q Q I ro QLi cn ■ J Q 0 0 0 Q J 0' ■ ■ U O �_ U p �O ■ J U Z W U W z W Q I ■ Q~ Of wI--(n ■ ■ o LEGEND ■ zo 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. o I ■ I — o I 0 Q2 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ( ■ ■ ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ ■ ® 6" Vehicular Curb 1 ■ ■ ■ O Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula ■ Standard No. 402 ■ + i © City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk ■ i Q B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) U o o ■ i R.O.W. �■ ■ ® E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) ■ o r7 ■ ■ ■ w ■ W ■ ry I ■ 1-- co W W ■ z I z ■ o O - J J ■ p n ■ Notes: H • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend m + • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend + 0 I ■ Z I _ ! SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 112 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Non Gateway A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS i .e � y _ Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 113 Non Gateway B Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS NEIGHBORHOOD STREET Various Neighborhood + Intersecting Neighborhood 10'-0' Streets 11i 1 J 00 000 00000 0000 000 4 2 -------------- -------------- LLJ O O 2� WQ Up O Z Z Q Q QLi (n L� ■ J Q 0 0 0 0 J 0' ■ ■ U O �_ U p �O ■ J U Z w U W Z W Q I ■ Q~ of wI(n ■ ■ o LEGEND ■ zo 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. o I ■ _ I o I 0 02 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ 0 6" Vehicular Curb ID■ ■ ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula ■ 1 ■ Standard No. 402 ■ ■ 0 City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk + ■ © B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) ■ i 0 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) U ■ ■ O o 14 R.O.W. �i ■ I ■ o r7 ■ ■ H ■ w ■ � ■ � w W Z z ■ ■ o O J J - ■ 0 n ■ Notes. H • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend m + • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend + 0 I ■ Z I _ ! SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 114 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Non Gateway B HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 115 Non Gateway B Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS Q MINOR DISTRICT CONNECTOR Various District Connector Streets + Intersecting 10'-0' Neighborhood Streets J 7 00 000 00000 0000 000 4 2 rK LLJ O O O� WQ C) O Z Z Q Q C'K I-- Q (n L�Li ■ J Q 0 0 0 0 J 0' ■ ■ U O �_ UO O Q ■ J U Z w U W Z W Q I ■ Q ~ of Li (n ■ ■ o LEGEND ■ zo 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. �_� o I ■ I o — I 0 02 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ( ■ 0 6" Vehicular Curb ID■ ■ ■ ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula 1 ■ Standard No. 402 ■ ■ 0 City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk + ■ © B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) ■ i 0 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) U ■ ■ O o ■ ■ o r7 ■ ■ w ■ W ■ ry I ■ co W W ■ z I z ■ o O - J J ■ p n ■ Notes: H • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend m + • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend + 0 I ■ Z I _ ! SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 116 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Non Gateway B HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 117 3.2 Site Materials 3.2.1 Street Lights LI 1 N "14UU JI.HLt V �� \ / ' / , Street Light Diagram 118 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards New pedestrian lighting should provide an engaging and attractive level of light per City of Temecula standards to enhance the pedestrian streetscape areas. Lighting shall be full cut-off dark sky compliant and energy efficient with LED lamps. Convenience power shall be provided through accessory outlets in each light pole to accommodate seasonal tree lighting or special event street lighting. Additional accent lighting such as tree uplighting will be utilized at medians, and stub -outs for future potential tree accent lighting at the allees shall be provided to enhance the character and gateway visibility once trees have established. A single street light fixture family that includes pedestrian and vehicular -scaled fixtures shall be utilized for the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. This fixture shall be compatible with existing City standard fixtures and shall offer a full range of accessories including pole -mounted banner arms, convenience outlets, and Wi-fi. Pedestrian lights shall face inward towards sidewalks, while banner arms extend toward the street. Types of Fixtures Major District Connector Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light with Banner Fixture Design Character Minor District Connector, Neighborhood Street and Allee (creek side) Pedestrian LED Light with Banner Fixture Dome Style: Round Edge Fixture Character Image Raised Medians Tree Accent Uplighting Pole Base Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 119 3.2.2 Tree Grates District standard tree grates and tree wells are sized to achieve the minimum root zone. Tree grates shall be minimum 4' x 10' of solid cast iron, ADA compliant with full frame mount and adjustable opening to accommodate tree growth over time. 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting New trees to be installed shall have a minimum box size of 36". Healthy soil conditions shall be created through excavation and soil remediation and amendments. Each tree shall have a minimum root zone of 40 square feet and 36" depth per tree. Reference the City of Temecula Landscape Manual for additional requirements and specifications. Where the minimum root zone cannot be achieved (such as where trees are located adjacent to existing utilities or in hardscape plazas in tree grates that are less than 40 square feet or within the Major District Connector A) the soil containment systems, Silva Cell, shall be used. Provide a minimum of 100 square feet at 36" depth of modular suspended pavement system (Silva Cell) for each tree. Modular suspended pavement systems support tree growth by maintaining an uncompacted tree root zone through the use of cellular, in -ground pedestal systems that support paving above while also allowing water infiltration for the development of healthy root mass. These systems also support on - site storm water management and treatment through absorption, evapotranspiration and interception. Reference the City of Temecula Landscape Manual for additional requirements and specifications. Understory and accent planting shall include low growing, drought tolerant species to reduce maintenance and allow views through the streetscape. Healthy soil conditions shall be created through excavation and soil remediation and amendments. No plants categorized as invasive by Cal-IPC shall be planted. Tree Grate Character Image Silva Cell Enlarged Section Simulation N. 120 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.3 Other Site Elements 3.3.1 Site Furnishings Site furnishings such as bike racks, cafe seating, benches, newspaper racks, trash and recycling receptacles are to be located within the Frontage Zone, between the property line and " Build -to "line. To encourage an eclectic, vibrant streetscape, these furnishings reflect the individual character of the private development or ground floor commercial uses. 3.3.2 Utilities and Equipment in the ROW Utilities are required to be located outside the sidewalk zones to the greatest extent possible. Items such as street lights, street trees, parking meters should be placed within the Utility Furnishing Zone, clear of the pedestrian through -way. When above -ground utilities must be placed in the public Right of Way, locate in the Utility Furnishing Zone adjacent to street and clear of the pedestrian through -way. Public art or murals on utilities shall conform with the City of Temecula art policy. 3.3.3 Bus Shelters Bus Shelters should be placed within the Utility Furnishings Zone. Bus shelter design shall be unique to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, supporting its clean, urban character. Shelter shall provide shade and seating as well as room for signage and be constructed of high quality, easily maintained and durable materials which may incorporate accent features such as accent lighting, wood slats or custom perforated steel panels. 3.3.4 Art Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 121 Public art is encouraged to reinforce the image of the District as well as define and represent the individual neighborhoods. Public art on public or private property shall reinforce the riparian and/or urban character of the Uptown District and enrich the public sphere with a high quality of design, installation and material. Art shall be durable, long lasting and maintainable. The following are potential locations and ideas. • Iconic artwork that is of sufficient scale to serve as a defining landmark at gateways and major intersections. • Wayfinding artwork such as decorative paving/ crosswalks, wall -mounted art, light sculpture and similar. • Neighborhood -Identity and Streetscape artwork such as benches, mosaics, decorative screens and fences that enrich and enliven the pedestrian experience Note that permanent art in the public right-of-way should conform to other guidelines for public sidewalks including installation in a location that does not obstruct pedestrian flow. Sidewalk inlay art pieces such as decorative paving, plaques or mosaics should meet all ADA requirements and all other federal, state and local codes and regulations regarding accessibility, including minimum friction coefficient requirements. Art in the Uptown District streetscape must comply with the City of Temecula Public Art Policy. 3.3.5 Signage District and Neighborhood Signage Historic or interpretive signage may be incorporated into the streetscape pavement or on standalone signs to highlight significant sites, features, events and locations. These locations are not identified on the plans but should be reviewed by The City of Temecula to determine appropriate locations and messages. Wayfinding Signage Historic or interpretive signage may be incorporated into the streetscape pavement or on standalone signs to highlight significant sites, features, events and locations. These locations are not identified on the plans but should be reviewed by Temecula XX to determine appropriate locations and messages. 122 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 123 APPENDIX Appendix 4.1 Materials Schedules 126 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District 126 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District 132 4.1.3 Site Furnishing Product Cut Sheets 141 4.2 Strategies for Low Impact Development 146 4.2.1 Recommended Low Impact Development Plant List 148 4.0 Material Schedules 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District The Following matrices outline the specific plant species, installation container size, and any design parameters associated with the planting design by district. Refer to Section 2.0 for the Street Typology and Section 3.0 for layout plans. Uptown Center District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Major District Connector A Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree grate) Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L-M Evergreen Understory (N/A) Major District Connector C Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L-M Evergreen Understory Planting (single species per block with seasonal bulbs) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' 5SFof grasses Bouteloua `Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon Tx 3' Bulb L Grass/ L Groundcover Grass/ L Groundcover Minor District Connector Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Rhus lancea African Sumac 36" box 30' x 30' Standard L Understory Planting (See Uptown Center District Neighborhood Street Understory Plant List below) Neighborhood Street East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x `Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street) Dietes 'Variegata' Variegated Dietes 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Perennial Rosa Icecap' White Flowering Rose 5 gallon 2' x 5' Flowering L-M Shrub Westringia fruticosa Dwarf Coast Rosemary 5 gallon 4' x 4' Variegated L `Morning Light' Shrub Secondary Gateway A Understory Planting (combination of 3 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' Bulb L 5SFof grasses Bouteloua `Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Groundcover Cistus `Sunset' Creeping Rock Rose 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L Groundcover Coprosma petriei `Verde Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon Tx 4' Variegated L Vista' Shrub Salvia x `Heatwave Glitter Lilac Blooming Salvia 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowing L Sage' Shrub Deep pink bloom in late summer; plant in natural groupings within grasses Golden flag -like summer flowers Evergreen ■ Evergreen; select male Evergreen, minor flowing and fruit Grass -like with creamy flowers in spring -summer Creamy -white flowers in spring - summer Cream -margined gray -green variated foliage Deep pink bloom in late summer; plant in natural groupings within grasses Golden flag -like summer flowers Magenta flowers spring -summer Cream -margined gray -green variated foliage Lilac blooms spring -fall Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Hotel / Tourism District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Major District Connector A Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree grate) Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L-M Evergreen Understory (N/A) Major District Connector B East and Allee Street and Allee Tree (in 4' wide continuous planting area with understory planting) Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 48" box 80' x 50' Standard L-M Deciduous; late summer -fall color Understory Planting (a combination of grasses in natural groupings with flowering seasonal accents) Bouteloua `Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Golden flag -like summer flowers Groundcover Dianella revoluta `Little Rev' Blue Flax Lily 5 gallon 2' x 2' Perennial L Grass -like blue foliage Pennisetum `Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Cream -white summer flowers Groundcover Neighborhood Street North / South Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Lagerstroemia indica x Natchez Crape Myrtle 36" box 20' x 20' Standard L Deciduous; white summer fauriei `Natchez' flowers and fall foliage color East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x `Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M Evergreen; minor flowing and fruit Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street) Coprosma petriei `Verde Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon Tx 4' Variegated L Vista' Shrub Myrtus communis Dwarf Myrtle 5 gallon Tx 3' Shrub L `Compacta' Ilex vomitoria `Stoke's Stoke's Dwarf Yaupon 5 gallon Tx 4' Shrub L Dwarf' Holly Rhaphiolepis umbellata Dwarf Yedda Hawthorn 5 gallon Tx 4' Shrub L `Minor' Entry Median Entry Median Tree (in 12'-16' wide median with understory planting) Cercis canadensis Oklahoma Western 48" box 25' x 25' Multi -trunk L `Oklahoma' Redbud Understory Planting (combination of all species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' Bulb L 5SFof grasses Bouteloua `Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Cistus `Sunset' Coprosma petriei `Verde Vista' Salvia x `Heatwave Glitter Sage' Creeping Rock Rose 5 gallon 2' x 6' Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon Tx 4' Lilac Blooming Salvia 5 gallon Tx 3' Cream -margined gray -green variated foliage Compact evergreen shrub with minor creamy -white flowers Tight branching evergreen shrub; select male Upright evergreen shrub with coppery -red new growth Deciduous; magenta flowers spring Deep pink bloom in late summer; plant in natural groupings within grasses Golden flag -like summer flowers Groundcover Groundcover L Magenta flowers spring -summer Variegated L Cream -margined gray -green Shrub variated foliage Flowing L Lilac blooms spring -fall Shrub Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 127 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Sports / Transit District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Major District Connector B East and Allee Street and Allee Tree (in 4' wide continuous planting area with understory planting) Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 48" box 80' x 50' Standard L-M Deciduous; late summer -fall color Understory Planting (a combination of grasses in natural groupings with flowering seasonal accents) Bouteloua `Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Golden flag -like summer flowers groundcover Dianella revoluta `Little Rev' Blue Flax Lily 5 gallon 2' x 2' Perennial L Grass -like blue foliage Pennisetum `Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Cream -white summer flowers groundcover Minor District Connector Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Lophostemon conferta Brisbane Box 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L Evergreen Understory Planting (See Uptown Sports / Transit District Neighborhood Street Understory Plant List below) Neighborhood Street North / South Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Lagerstroemia indica x Natchez Crap Myrtle 36" box 20' x 20' Standard L Deciduous; white summer fauriei `Natchez' flowers and fall foliage color East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x `Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M Evergreen; minor flowing and fruit Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street) Dietes `Variegate' Variegated Dietes 5 gallon Tx 3' Pennisetum `Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon Tx 3 Entry Median Entry Median Tree (in 12'-16' wide median with understory planting) Flowering L Grass -like with creamy flowers Perennial spring -summer Grass/ L Cream -white summer flowers Groundcover Cercis canadensis Oklahoma Western 48" box 25' x 25' Multi -trunk L Deciduous; magenta flowers `Oklahoma' Redbud spring Understory Planting (combination of all species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) ; see Uptown Sports / Transit District Secondary Gateway Understory Plant List below) Minor District Connector Median Median Tree (in 12'-16' wide median with understory planting) Cercis canadensis Oklahoma Western 48" box 25' x 25' Multi -trunk L Deciduous; magenta flowers `Oklahoma' Redbud spring Understory Planting (combination of accent plants for color and texture contrast) Cistus x hybridus White Rockrose 5 gallon 4' x 8' Flowering L White flowers spring -summer Shrub Coprosma petriei `Verde Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon Tx 4' Variegated L Cream -margined gray -green Vista' Shrub variated foliage Dietes `Variegata' Variegated Dietes 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Grass -like with creamy flowers Perennial spring -summer Pennisetum `Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Cream -white summer flowers Groundcover Rosa Icecap' White Flowering Rose 5 gallon 2' x 5' Flowering L Creamy -white flowers spring - Shrub summer Westringia fruticosa Dwarf Coast Rosemary 5 gallon 4' x 4' Variegated L Cream -margined gray -green `Morning Light' Shrub variated foliage 128 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Sports / Transit District (Continued) Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Secondary Gateway A Understory Planting (combination of 3 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' Bulb L Deep pink flowers in late 5 SF of summer; plant in natural grasses groupings within grasses Bouteloua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Golden flag -like summer flowers Groundcover Cistus `Sunset' Creeping Rock Rose 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L Magenta flowers spring -summer Groundcover Coprosma petriei `Verde Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon Tx 4' Variegated L Cream -margined gray -green Vista' Shrub variated foliage Salvia x `Heatwave Glitter Lilac Blooming Salvia 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowing L Lilac flowers spring -fall Sage' Shrub Uptown Arts District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Minor District Connector . Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Rhus lancea African Sumac 36" box 30' x 30' Standard L Evergreen; select male Understory Planting (See Uptown Arts District Neighborhood Street Understory Plant List below) Neighborhood Street North / South Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Lagerstroemia indica x Natchez Crape Myrtle 36" box 20' x 20' Standard L Deciduous; white summer fauriei `Natchez' flowers and fall foliage color East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x `Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M Evergreen, minor flowing and fruit Understory Planting (Select one plant pairing below, use on both sides of street per block; arrange in natural groupings): Plant Pairing 1: Salvia leucantha `Santa Santa Barbara Mexican 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Deep purple flowers spring -fall Barbara' Bush Sage Perennial Sesleria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Cream to bronze flowers Groundcover summer -fall Plant Pairing 2: Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Evergreen Groundcover Verbena lilacina `De La De La Mina Verbena 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Purple flowers spring -fall Mina' Perennila Plant Pairing 3: Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Evergreen Groundcover Melampodium leucanthum Blackfoot Daisy 5 gallon 18"x 18" Flowering L Grey -green foliage with white Perennial flowers early spring -fall Plant Pairing 4: Rosa californica California Wild Rose 5 gallon 4' x 4' Flowering L Deciduous; pink flowers spring - Shrub summer Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 129 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Arts District (Continued) Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Secondary Gateway B Understory Planting (combination of 3 to 5 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Evergreen Groundcover Iris douglasiana Douglas Iris 1 bulb per 2' x 2' Bulb L Lavender blue flowers in late 5 SF of spring; plant in natural groupings grasses within grasses Rosmarinus officinalis Creeping Rosemary 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L Blue -purple flowers winter -spring `Huntington Carpet' Groundcover Salvia leucantha `Santa Santa Barbara Mexican 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Purple flowers spring -fall Barbara' Bush Sage Perennial Santolina chamaecyparissus Dwarf Sea Cotton 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Gray foliage with yellow flowers `Nana' Groundcover in spring -summer Sesleria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass 5 gallon 2' x 5' Grass/ L Cream to Bronze summer -fall Groundcover flowers Creekside Village District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Major District Connector C Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L-M Evergreen Understory Planting (single species per block with seasonal bulbs) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' Bulb L Deep pink bloom in late summer; 5 SF of plant in natural groupings within grasses grasses Bouteloua `Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Golden flag -like summer flowers Groundcover Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Evergreen Groundcover Minor District Connector Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Rhus lancea African Sumac 36" box 30' x 30' Standard L Evergreen; select male Understory Planting (See Creekside Village District Neighborhood Street Understory Plant List below) Neighborhood Street East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x `Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M Evergreen, minor flowing and fruit Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street) Bouteloua `Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Golden flag -like summer flowers Groundcover Pennisetum `Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Cream -white summer flowers Groundcover Sesleria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass 5 gallon 2' x 5' Grass/ L Cream to Bronze summer -fall Groundcover flowers 130 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Creekside Village District (Continued) Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Secondary Gateway A Understory Planting (combination of 3 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' Bulb L 5SFof grasses Bouteloua `Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Groundcover Cistus `Sunset' Creeping Rock Rose 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L Groundcover Coprosma petriei `Verde Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon Tx 4' Variegated L Vista' Shrub Salvia x `Heatwave Glitter Lilac Blooming Salvia 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowing L Sage' Shrub Secondary Gateway B Understory Planting (combination of 3 to 5 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Groundcover Iris douglasiana Douglas Iris 1 bulb per 2' x 2' Bulb L 5SFof grasses Rosmarinus officinalis Creeping Rosemary 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L Deep pink flowers in late summer; plant in natural groupings within grasses Golden flag -like summer flowers Magenta flowers spring -summer Cream -margined gray -green variated foliage Lilac flowers spring -fall Evergreen Lavender blue flowers in late spring; plant in natural groupings within grasses Blue -purple flowers winter -spring `Huntington Carpet' Groundcover Salvia leucantha 'Santa Santa Barbara Mexican 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Purple flowers spring -fall Barbara' Bush Sage Perennial Santolina chamaecyparissus Dwarf Sea Cotton 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Gray foliage with yellow flowers `Nana' Groundcover in spring -summer Sesleria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass 5 gallon 2' x 5' Grass/ L Cream to Bronze summer -fall Groundcover flowers Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 131 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District The following matrices outline the specific paving and site furnishings associated with the District. Refer to Section 2.0 for the Street Typology Section and Section 3.0 for layout plans. Uptown Center District Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Major District Connector A Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Paving - Furnishing Zone Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Tree Grate Neenah / R-8815-b Natural Cast Iron 4'-0" x 10'-0" Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Major District Connector C Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Paving - Furnishing Zone Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Minor District Connector Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Paving - Furnishing Zone Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. #5447 Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5'-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c. scr. jts. Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish 132 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Center District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Primary Gateway and Secondary Gateway A Paving - Corner or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8"x8„ Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 133 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District The Following matrices outline the specific type, dimensions and design parameters associated with the hardscape paving and site furnishings materials by district. Refer to Section 2.0 for the Street Typology and Section 3.0 for layout plans. Uptown Hotel / Tourism District Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Major District Connector A Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Paving - Furnishing Zone Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Tree Grate Neenah / R-8815-b Natural Cast Iron 4'-0" x 10'-0" Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Major District Connector B East Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Major District Connector B Allee Paving - Pedestrian and Creekside Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Site Furnishings Street Light (Street Side) Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Pedestrian Light (Creekside) Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Boulders Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5'-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c. scr. jts. Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish 134 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Hotel / Tourism District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Entry Median Paving - Maintenance Path Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Full length pieces mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Tree Accent Uplighting B-K Lighting / Integral TBD 2 per Tree Artistar LED Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5-0" o.c. scr. jts. Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards Uptown Sports / Transit District Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Major District Connector B East Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 135 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Sports / Transit District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Major District Connector B Attee Paving - Pedestrian and Creekside Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Site Furnishings Street Light (Street Side) Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Pedestrian Light (Creekside) Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Boulders Minor District Connector Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. #5447 Paving - Furnishing Zone Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. #5447 Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5'-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c. scr. jts. Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Entry Median Paving - Maintenance Path Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Full length pieces mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Tree Accent Uplighting B-K Lighting / Integral TBD 2 per Tree Artistar LED Minor District Connector Median Paving - Maintenance Path Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Full length pieces mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Tree Accent Uplighting B-K Lighting / Integral TBD 2 per Tree Artistar LED 136 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Sports / Transit District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Primary Gateway and Secondary Gateway A Paving - Corner or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8"x8„ Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards Uptown Arts District Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Minor District Connector Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. #5447 Paving - Furnishing Zone Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. #5447 Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole page 142 Finish Notes See cutsheet for model # Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 137 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Arts District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c. scr. jts. Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Secondary Gateway B Paving - Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 000 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8"x8„ Tertiary Gateway Paving - Corner or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8"x8„ Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards 138 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Creekside Village District Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Major District Connector C Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Paving - Furnishing Zones Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole page 141 Finish Minor District Connector Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. #5447 Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole page 142 Finish Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c. scr. jts. Site Furnishings Running Bond pattern See cutsheet for model # See cutsheet for model # Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Primary Gateway and Secondary Gateway A Paving - Corner or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8"x8„ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 139 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Creekside Village District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Secondary Gateway B Paving - Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Dimensions Notes 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 000 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8"x8„ Tertiary Gateway Paving - Corner or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8"x8„ Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards 140 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.3 Site Furnishing Product Cut Sheets Product Cut Sheets Street Light TBD �O SIDEWALK SIDE STREET SIDE ARM/FIXTURE O BANNER ARMS LLJ ACCESS DOOR ARM/FIXTURE N m �o i� < QU \m mM 0 "Cn W ae la jN 2'-11" U) n I LED SOURCE NON o N Uj 1 OARC4OT2 140 LED'S, tV $a� 158w, 4,000K Q_O rno TYPE 2 DISTRIBUTION j1 I"T'c�s LED LIGHT SOURCELLJ W _j t w 2 EZ HANG STRAIGHT N c COUPLING U U .0 v DRIVER COMPARTMENT Ed Ed F- F- �cn & 2'-6 1 /2" I -27" DIA. ROUND EDGE Q m SHADE o FLAT HEAVY DIFFUSE ACRYLIC LENS LED SOURCE 6ARC40T2 84 LED'S, 94w' 4,000K TYPE 2 DISTRIBUTION b � EZ HANG STRAIGHT COUPLING b DRIVER COMPARTMENT N 21" DIA. ROUND EDGE SHADE FLAT HEAVY DIFFUSE ACRYLIC LENS THE 7/8" DIA BANNER ARMS ARE 37" APART FROM THE TOP 20" OF THE UPPER ARM, TO THE BOTTOM OF THE LOWER ARM BANNER ARMS SET FOR i 18" X 36" BANNERS 4 BANNERS BY OTHERS 6" DIA. ALUMINUM ROUND Q STRAIGHT SMOOTH POLE I � m _I ro 24" DIA. TWO PIECE CLAMP ON BASE WITH ONE ACCESS DOOR �n SPLIT BASE PROVIDED WITH INTERNAL ANCHORING TABS (HARDWARE BY OTHERS) SEE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS Description Decorative Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light with Banner Kit Manufacturer: Sternberg Lighting Product Number: 1A-1527LED-R-I0ARC40T2- MDL03-SV2-EZ / OBPM / 1AM- 1521 LED-R-6ARC40T2-MDL03- SV2-EZ / OBPM / 9720ARSS / DBA /BCC4/DBT Finish: Dark Bronze Textured Finish Pole Height: 20' 0„ Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 141 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Pedestrian Light Arms and Accessory Orientation OBSPM 180 Double Banner Arm (DBA) 0 180° I —90°— —2701 0° (4) 3/4" X 18" Anchor Bolts, 10" Bolt Circle, Diamond pattern Access Door Orientation: 0° Street Side Orientation: 180° Sternberg Lighting E51ABLISHED 1923 I EMPLOYEE OWNED 555 Lawrence Avenue I Roselle, IL 601721 P a47.588-01..sternberglighting.com CONCEPTUAL ASSEMBLY DRAWING, SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING VERIFICATION BY THE FACTORY ARM ARM MOUNTED FIXTURE: 1521LED 1521 Omega decorative downlight fixture features a spun aluminum bell styled shade with a flared or rounded edge. An aluminum casting is attached to the upper portion of the bell shade to allow coupling to mulitple arms. Fixture features sealed and rotatable optics. Available with Flat, sag, clear or frosted glass. Shade Style & Round (R) Mounting: LIGHT SOURCE:-6ARC40T2-MDL03-SV2 Amay: 6ARC (84 LEDS, 94 Watts) (6ARC) Color Temp: 4000K (40) Distribution: Type 2 (T2) Driver: Multi -Volt Dimmable Low -Range Driver,120-277V (MDL03) Lens: Flat Diffuse Acrylic Lens (SV2) ARM:OBSPM OBSPM POLE: 7715P5-.250 The 16" diameter cast 356 aluminum alloy base and aluminum shaft shall be a one-piece construction. The pole shall be U.L. or E.T.L. listed in U.S. and Canada. All pole heights to have a tolerance of t 2" Model: 7700 (77) Height: 15 Ft (15) Shaft Type: Smooth Straight 51nch, 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy (P5) Gauge: 0.250 (.250) POLE CAP: BCC4 4" Ball Center Cap - BCC4 FINISH: DBT Assembly shall be powder coated to Dark Bronze Textured finish. Prior to coating, the assembly shall be chemically cleaned and etched in a 5-stage washing system which includes alkaline cleaning, rinsing, phosphoric etching, reverse osmosis water rinsing, and non -chrome sealing to ensure corrosion resistance. Wind Load Evaluation This assembly, as configured, MEETS AASHTO requirements for wind loading Wind Speed: 90 mph Gust Factor: 1.14 Job Name: Temecula streetscape Customer Signature: Drawing#21954 Job Location: Temecula, CA Date: 2018/04/18 1 of Description Decorative Pedestrian LED Light with Banner Kit Manufacturer: Sternberg Lighting Product Number: 1521 LED-R-6ARC40T2-MDL03-SV 2 / DBSPM / 7715P5-.250 / BCC4 / DBA / DBT Finish: Dark Bronze Textured Finish Pole Height / Mounting Height: 15'0"/11'6" 142 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Pedestrian Light (Continued) Sternberg Lighting ESTAIILISHED idM / EMPLOYEE OWNED 555 Lawrence Avenue I Roselle, IL 60172 1 p 847.588.3400 1 www.sternberglighting.com CONCEPTUAL ASSEMBLY DRAWING, SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING VERIFICATION BY THE FACTORY Job Name: Temecula StreetScape Customer Signature: Drawing #21954 Job Location: Temecula, CA Date: 2018/04/18 2 of 2 c� m 0 to Z C 3 6 (D Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 143 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Tree Grate R-8R15-B Extended Collection Tree Grate 4pnX120n Finish: Natural Cast Iron 1t\\%. Description 4' x 10' Extended Collection, Cast Iron TWo-Piece Grate Manufacturer: Neenah Enterprises, Inc Product Number: R-8815-B Finish: Natural Cast Iron Dimensions: 48" x 120" Tree Hole Diameter: 18" 144 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Silva Cell Description Silva Cell planting system for large canopy street trees Manufacturer: deeproot Product Number: XXX STREETSCAPE APPLICATION I CONCRETE. Ix 11x SILVA CELL SYSTEM FOR CONCRETE PAVING ON AGGREGATE BASE -SAMPLE PLAN TYPICAL SILVA CELL TYPICALCONDNION I BACK OF CURB _ WFICALCONDNION I ME OPENING _ TYPICALCONDNION PAVEMENTSECTION TYPICAL CONDITION LEDGE OF SILVA CELL GROUP I \II \II \II \I I II II II I I II II II I 18"MIN. II II II `STREET°°`°`°"°° VARIES ADJACENT WALK DR BUILDING I II 6'MIN. II II I D • F �' F I8" I B B I �H J aI K O u LID J OH / '�//✓.// fin/ P /%i /V/n/✓ ;/finV� ,: �n�. %✓ �/ I II II II I I II II II I I II II II I I II II II I I II II II I I II 1l II I ro..,�...° ,°=E ,...n.°� STREETSCAPE APPLICATION CONCRETE.1x I Ix SILVA CELL SYSTEM FOR CONCRETE PAVING ON AGGREGATE BASE -SECTION KEY PLAN OA SILVA CELL SYSTEM(DECK, BASE, AND POSTS) Z OB DEEPROOT UB12-2 ROOT BARRIER. INSTALL DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO CONCRETE O A EWE RESTRAINT Q ©TREE ROOT PACKAGE, SIZE VARIES 1 Q1-2" MULCH, PLACED IN TREE OPENING E 4"CIP CONCRETE PAVEMENT, TURNWN TO DECK ATTREE OPENING O w IF 04"AG GREGATEBASECOURSE U yY GQ GEOTEXTILETO EDGE OF EXCAVATOR w OH BACKFILL, TO WITHIN 0.6"BELOW TOP OF SILVA CELL DECKS INSTALL IN B'LIFTS, E EACH COMPACTED T095%PROCTOR. y~j OI GEOGRID TO LINE PERIMETER OF SYSTEM WITH 6" TOE (OUTWARD FROM BASE) AND 12" EXCESS (EVER TOP OF DECK) - 03/16'k14"ZIP TIES, SECURING GEOGRID TO SILVA CELLS Q PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL IN 12"LIFTS, EACH COMPACTED TO 7080% PROCTOR U A F © SILVA CELL BASE SLOPE, S%MAX B J 00"UP4 SPXIING BETWEEN SILVA CELLS AT BASE j ON 4'MIN. AGGREGATE SUB BASE, COMPARED T095%PROCTOR A O GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, PLACED BELOW AGGREGATE SUB BASE © SUWRADE, COMPACTED T095%PROCTOR l" NOTES 1�0�1H��Q�"9tt P EDINACCOADAICE WIN B. vaGMAT SurrIEMENTUMG iRxcATIDNr RSE ON4 a GHTSUPPDR CFT EES�&ILs 4 zor�u ..•..xdmse Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 145 4.2 Strategies for Low Impact Development The City of Temecula is considering preparation of a Stormwater Master Plan for the Uptown Temecula District. The goal for this plan is to assess capacity and feasibility for treatment of stormwater run-off within the right-of-way through the use of low impact development measures (LIDs), particularly flow -through planters. This section discusses issues related to integration of LIDS within the urban design framework outlined in the Sidewalk Standards document. A flow -through planter is designed to filter pollutants and sediment from surface stormwater run-off. Generally, layers of organic materials (mulch, plants and soil) in combination with drainage material such as crushed rock, capture and treat stormwater contaminants and --where native soil conditions permit-- allow the water to infiltrate and recharge groundwater and/or evaporate. Where native soils are not conducive to infiltration (a common condition in our region), stormwater is collected, stored and treated and conveyed to the City stormwater system. In either case flow -through planters are designed to accommodate peak flow during storm events and incorporate a prescribed amount of void area or freeboard at the surface, to serve as a reservoir during periods of heavy inundation. CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL SW-12 FINISHED ELEVATION (FE) OVERFLOW CURB INLET STRUCTURE DETAIL SW-17, ELEV. (OE) GUTTER INLET ELEV.(GIE) STIR ET- „ 6" MIN/12" MAX PONDII 18" MIN OR 24" MIN IF 6" MIN NATIVE SOIL BENCH, 6" MIN 12" PREFERRED OR AS DIRECTED BY CIVIL OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER 4" MIN. EXPOSED WALL 3" MULCH HEIGHT I AYFR ffffff�����11/////��/�� —` DEEP CURB DETAIL SW-13 UNDERDRAIN AND OVERFLOW - CONNECT TO STORM DRAIN OR APPROVED DISCHARGE LOCATION CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL (AGGREGATE). DEPTH LEGEND PER PROJECT REQUIREMENTS ®1 MULCH/COMPOST LAYER (SEE DESIGN NOTE 12) MINIMUM 12", SEE DESIGN NOTE 0 BIORETENTION SOIL MEDIA (BSM) UNDERDRAIN, MIN. 4" DIA. PVC 99 AGGREGATE SDR 35 PERFORATED PIPE, © NATIVE SOIL SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTE 4 ® ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. MAINTAIN UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL BENCH TO SUPPORT ADJACENT SIDEWALKIROAD. SEQUENCE WORK TO CONSTRUCT CURBS BEFORE EXCAVATING BIORETENTION AREA FOR AGGREGATE AND BSM. 2. SCARIFY SUBGRADE BEFORE INSTALLING BIORETENTION AREA AGGREGATE AND BSM 3. FACILITY EXCAVATION TO ALLOW FOR SPECIFIED AGGREGATE, BSM, AND MULCH DEPTHS TO ACHIEVE FINISHED ELEVATIONS ON CIVIL PLANS. 4. INSTALL UNDERDRAIN WITH HOLES FACING DOWN. TOP OF UNDERDRAIN 6" BELOW TOP OF AGGREGATE LAYER. UNDERDRAIN SLOPE MAY BE FLAT. 5. COMPACT EACH 6" LIFT OF BSM WITH LANDSCAPE ROLLER OR BY LIGHTLY WETTING. IF WETTING, LET DRY OVERNIGHT BEFORE PLANTING. 6. DO NOT WORK WITHIN BIORETENTION AREA DURING RAIN OR UNDER WET CONDITIONS. 7. KEEP HEAVY MACHINERY OUTSIDE BIORETENTION AREA LIMITS. 8. STORMWATER SHOULD BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM BIORETENTION UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND DRAINAGE AREA VEGETATION IS STABILIZED. ® APPROVED BY: STREET BIORETENTION PLANTER BOX, NO STANDARD PLAN NO. PARKING, WITH UNDERDRAIN SW-4 VERSION: D UN DEVELOPEDER PROP.84 GRANT 08/31/2017 USE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORK CONSTRUCTION I SHEET 1 OF 2 CASOA LID Stormwater Management Standard Detail for Reference Only 146 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Curb adjacent planting areas, bulb -outs and curb extensions can be great opportunities to locate flow -through planters within the streetscape. They not only reduce the quantity and improve the quality of stormwater runoff but can also contribute to the character of the streetscape and image of the District as a whole. However, when considering the integration of planters within the streetscape, design criteria must be defined to ensure pedestrian accessibility, comfort and safety. Additionally, planters must be designed to not only treat storm water run-off but also support the successful growth and long-term health of plant material. Planter size, depth and particularly plant selection are all critical components. These issues are discussed in further depth below, as well as Appeddix K of the City of Temecula "Green Street Design Criteria". Differences between Sloped and Ponding Surfaces: In many bioretention swales and rain gardens, soil surface is sloped, resulting in differing planting conditions across the structure. Plants located at the bottom where ponding occurs, will have different requirements than those placed on the sideslopes, which receive runoff, but not ponding. At 4 feet wide, the relatively narrow street planting section of the Uptown District makes it impossible to successfully implement planters with sloped sides. More likely, the flow -through planters will have a uniform surface and achieve required freeboard by depressing the finish grade to several inches below the finish surface of adjacent sidewalk, effectively creating a ponding condition throughout the planter. Plant Selection for LIDS: Critical factors in selecting plants for LIDs is their proximity to ponding water and the duration of time water will be present in the LID reservoir prior to percolation or conveyance to the storm system. Many plants that appear on general plant lists for LIDs include species that are well -suite for sloped sides of a swale but may not tolerate prolonged or frequent periods of inundation. As discussed above, a uniform surface that can accommodate ponding is assumed for flow -through planters within the urban streetscape. Consequently plant selection is limited to those plants that can withstand periods of inundation. While there are many options for rushes, grasses and other understory plants and perennials, most trees are unable to survive conditions in which they are subjected to inundation at the root crown. There are some tree species that are part of riparian plant communities (such as California Sycamores, White Alder or Australian Water Gum) that are adapted to these conditions. However their aggressive root systems and branching structures make them incompatible within the narrow confines of an urban streetscape. These criteria create a significant challenge to incorporating flow -through planters into a cohesive framework for street trees. Using a combination of street trees in conventional planters and understory planting in flow -through planters may provide a more flexible strategy. In addition, the flow -through planters may be located in bulb -outs and sidewalk extensions strategically located for stormwater collection. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 147 This appendix includes a plant list for Flow -through planters (Figure X). While there are other plants that are suitable for LIDs in Southern California, this list was refined to include plants that are tolerant of both wet and dry moisture conditions, locally available, relatively low maintenance and attractive year round and are native or locally adapted and non-invasive. In addition, project specific aspects of the design, for example right-of-way vegetation height limits, approved street and parking lot tree lists and fire hazard landscape requirements may further influence selection. As assessment of invasive species is constantly evolving, this plant list should be checked against the California inventory at www.cal-ipc.org. Planting Soils for LIDS: Specifying the correct soils for biofilitration areas is critical in order to achieve stormwater objectives and plant health. Soils must possess high enough infiltration rates to meet surface water draw down requirements, however infiltration must be slow enough to support the pollutant removal function of soils. Additionally, soil composition must support plant establishment and long-term health. Landscape design documents for LID projects must include a bioretention soil specification that specifies the exact materials to be used in the mix (aggregates and compost), the percent of each material included in the mix, how they are to be placed (i.e. in 8" to 12" lifts) and the soil mix depth. Pedestrian Safety and Access: As discussed, due to the narrow street planting section of the Uptown District, flow -through planters will likely have a uniform surface with a finish grade several inches below the finish surface of adjacent sidewalk, which may create a hazardous condition for pedestrians. A minimum 4" high curb (with block -outs or inlets to receive surface flow) or an 18" high steel decorative fence must be provided around the planter to mitigate the pedestrian trip/ fall hazard. Alternatively, in some situations, planters can be designed with steel grates, rock mulch or other material that finish flush with adjacent pedestrian surface (though planters must be sized to accommodate the reservoir area usurped by the rock mulch). Flow -through planters located adjacent to on -street parking present additional challenges for pedestrian access. They should be located a minimum of 12" from the back of curb to provide a "step -off area" for pedestrians entering and exiting parked cars. The adjusted planter location must not create a pinch point in the pedestrian zone or impede the smooth flow of foot traffic. Continuous planters must provide ADA-compliant pedestrian crossing areas at regular intervals to ensure all people entering and exiting parked cars are able to do so without encumbrance. 148 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.2.1 Recommended Low Impact Development Plant List Uptown Temecula LID Plant List Trees (locate only in larger flow -through planters with sloped sides, outside areas subject to ponding water) Species Common name Size Form Water Notes Alnus rhombifolia White Alder 70' x 40' Low branching standard L Deciduous; small woody cones in winter Cercis candensis 'Oklahoma' Eastern Redbud 25' x 25' Standards or Multi L Deciduous; magenta flowers in early spring Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 15' x 15' Multi L Deciduous; magenta flowers in early spring Chilopsis linearis'Purple Splendor Desert Willow 20' x 20' Multi L Deciduous Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 30' x 20' Standard; low branch standard L Evergreen Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree 40' x 40' Standard L-M Deciduous; yellow and red flowers and bracts Lagerstroemia indica 'Muskogee' Crape Myrtle 25'x20' Standard and Multi L-M Deciduous; showy flowers; fall color Laurus nobilis Sweet Laurel 35' x 35' Standard L-M Evergreen Lophostemon conferta Brisbane Box 40' x 30' Standard L Evergreen Platanus mexicana Mexican Sycamore 70' x 50' Low branching standard L-M Deciduous Prosopis glandulosa'Maverick' Fremont Cottonwood 40' x 40' Mesquite L Deciduous; small green flowers; seed pods Quercus ilex Holly Oak 40' x 40' Standard L Evergreen Shrubs and Grasses Species Common name Size Form Water Notes Baccharis pilularis'Pigeon Point' Coyote Brush 3' x 8' Spreading groundcover L Mounding spreader Boutelou 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 2' x 2' Grass/ groundcover L Flag -like summer flowers Chondropetalum tectorum Cape Rush 4' x 4' Grass/ rush L Brown seeds at tips Cistus hybridus Rockrose 4' x 8' Flowering shrub L Magenta flowers in summer Cistus'Sunset" Creeping Rock Rose 2' x 6' Groundcover L Magenta flowers spring -summer Dianella revoluta Blue Flax Lily 2' x2' Grass/ groundcover L Wide blue foliage Dietes variegata Variegated Dietes 3' x 3' Perennial L Grass -like with creamy flowers in spring -summer Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 3' x 3' Grass/ groundcover L Evergreen Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 8' x 8'+ Large shrub/ small tree L Evergreen; whist flowers and red berries Iva hayesiana Marsh elder Tx 6' Spreading groundcover L-M Spreading groundcover Juncus patens California rush 3' x 3' Grass/ rush L-M Gray green spreading rush Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 4' x 4' Grass L Golden efflorescence Muhlenbergia capallaris 'Regal Mist' Pink Muhly Tx 3' Grass L Pink efflorescence Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 149 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: March 20, 2019 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Dale West, Associate Planner II APPLICANT NAME: City of Temecula PROJECT Long Range Nos. LR16-0223 and LR17-0724, an amendment to the SUMMARY: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to make clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification of legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, to make minor typographical edits and the adoption of Appendix G, establishing streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which includes the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. CEQA: Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared, which concludes that the proposed changes, additions, or modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and/or mitigated in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified in November 2015 (SCH #2013061012). None of the conditions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR are present, and no additional environmental review is required. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Uptown Temecula Specific Plan amendments and the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. BACKGROUND SUMMARY The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (UTSP) encompasses approximately 560 acres and is located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, east of Diaz Road/Murrieta Creek and south of Cherry Street. The UTSP includes six districts and two overlay areas, consisting of a mixed -use residential development, as well as property designated for conservation/open space (Murrieta Creek). The City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan on November 17, 2015, and as part of the adoption, the Council also directed staff to prepare a streetscape beautification and marketing plan for the newly adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. In June of 2017, Staff entered into an agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects to prepare the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards (Sidewalk Standards). The development of the Sidewalk Standards involved two community workshops on July 17, 2017 and August 31, 2017, two meetings with Public Works, two meetings with the Planning Commission Sub Committee, and four meetings with the City Council Uptown Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee to obtain input and direction while developing the plan. In addition to preparing the Sidewalk Standards, staff has identified various typographical edits and needed clarifications to improve the implementation of the Plan. Both the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards and the proposed Specific Plan amendments are further in the following pages. ANALYSIS Proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is a form based code. A form base code focuses on the physical form of buildings and their relationship to the public realm, which consists of the sidewalk and street. Generally speaking, for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, this means that any new building that fronts a street, is to be placed ten feet behind the property line, creating a 20 foot sidewalk. The sidewalk is made up of four sections, or zones: 1) Curb Zone, 2) Utility Zone, 3) Pedestrian Zone, and 4) Frontage Zone. The Curb and Utility Zones do not change in size, whereas, the Pedestrian Zone and Frontage Zone may vary depending on if the frontage zone is used for outdoor seating or not. The Frontage Zone allows the opportunity to activate the public realm with sidewalk cafe style seating. This results in a minimum of six feet within the Pedestrian Zone, where pedestrians can move about freely from any obstructions from the Utility Zone or Frontage Zone, as shown in the adjacent illustrations. The proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards primarily focus on this area of the sidewalk by identifying the concrete finish and color, tree species, tree grates, understory plant mix, and street light fixtures for all of Uptown Temecula. The streets are categorized into three street types: Major District Connector, Minor District Connector and Neighborhood Street. The concrete finishes and score pattern, tree species, and understory plants vary depending on the street type within Uptown Temecula. This is done to add variety, interest and to create a natural "way - finding" throughout the Uptown Temecula area. The following is a summary of the major elements of the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards for Uptown Temecula. E........... Allees, Medians and Gateways: Two primary entrance gateways into Uptown Temecula are located at the north and southern ends of Jefferson Avenue. The north gateway begins at Cherry Street and the south gateway begins at Rancho California Road. Both gateways share a distinguishing characteristic in that they are linear gateways framed by Jefferson Avenue to the east and Murrieta Creek to the west. These open space areas provide an opportunity to create unique pedestrian gateways at the north and south entrances into Uptown and are referred to as an "allee." The allees provide an opportunity for a generously landscaped walkway, lined with California Sycamore, and an alternating sand/aggregate concrete finish, also adding interest and character to the allee. U CO a) 2 Allee J� m� I. r. 1 .l �R Median �I In addition to the allee, these two primary gateways include landscaped medians wide enough to accommodate drought tolerant understory planting and the flowering Western Redbud accent tree. These primary gateways will also allow for wayfinding signage, accent lighting and/or public art. The cross street section at the entry gateways is shown above and illustrates the tree lined allee along the creek side, the landscaped median, and the tree lined sidewalk adjacent to the building fagade. Key intersections within the UTSP will also act as gateways to the neighborhoods of Uptown Temecula. As illustrated below, key intersections will be unique in that their intersecting corners will have distinct characteristics including bulb -outs (where appropriate), concrete pavers, stamped asphalt crosswalks, and enhanced landscaping. All key intersection gateways will include the flowering Western Redbud accent tree to emphasize their importance as a gateway from one neighborhood to another neighborhood. The key intersection gateways are located at Jefferson Avenue/Sanborn Avenue, Jefferson Avenue/Buecking Drive, Jefferson Avenue/Via Montezuma, Jefferson Avenue/Del Rio Road, Jefferson Avenue/La Haciendas, Jefferson Avenue/Calle Cortez, Winchester Road/Commerce Center Drive, Commerce Center Drive/Overland Drive, Commerce Center/Via Montezuma, Winchester Road//Diaz Road, and Overland Avenue/Diaz Road (See page 18 of the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards). North Corner ol Jefferson .............. Avenue -�- Via Montezuma North Corner ol Jefferson AvenuL +Del Rio Road ■ r — _�� ■.......r.»..... ■ ii C W Q L} n ZZ ad 0< c3 7) a L5 !3 " M a UW0 a CL ra F6 O U S rni_�_r i j i NEIGHBORHOOD STREA 1f7'-f1' LD Western Redbud — Deciduous, flowers in spring 5 Sidewalk Materials, Street Trees and Street Lights In order to add variety, interest and natural way -finding throughout the Uptown Temecula area, sidewalk concrete finishes and score patterns, tree species, understory plants and light standards will differ depending on the district and street within Uptown Temecula. Manor District Connector Street (Jefferson Avenue) The Major District Connector Street serves as the "Grand Boulevard" within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Like the allees, Jefferson Avenue will use the alternating sand/aggregate concrete finish; however, it will include brick pavers within the utility zone, tree grates, and an evergreen street tree (Fern Pine). Jefferson Avenue will have the only sidewalk with tree grates, pavers in the utility zone, and light poles with both a street light and pedestrian light, equipped with the option for banners. Because Jefferson Avenue is the main thoroughfare through Uptown Temecula, it will be the only sidewalk to have such unique character. Fern Pine - Evergreen Concrete Type 1. Davis C0101, Mrsa Buff Sandblast Finish Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate FSnish Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" AckerS'tvne 4We= Earth Tone Blend Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Z0o6 Zwe ZI)w curt 9.-61. 61 Al 61, Tree Grate: Neenah 4' xi0' N-8$15-b Strad Light: Vehicular and Fedestrian LED Light w! Bawer Kft Minor District Connector Streets Minor District Connector streets form the major circulation spines of each District. They are different from the Major District Connector in that they will only have the sand concrete finish as opposed to the alternating sand/aggregate concrete finish. They will have the African Sumac or the Brisbane tree species, as well as understory planting within the tree well, and pedestrian only lights instead of the street/pedestrian light combination. The variation in materials is intended to provide interest and differing character depending on where one is within Uptown Temecula. w' ■ ALIGN iw x J Concr&ta Type I Pedestrian LI ht: Da— Co!Qr Mesa Eof' P9[tesariaR LED Light wl Sandblast Finish Benner Kit African Sumac — Evergreen Brisbane Box — Evergreen 7 Neighborhood Streets Neighborhood Streets are the smaller streets that are internal to the Districts within Uptown and are important for building the character of a particular neighborhood for providing walkability. Similar to the Minor District Connector, Neighborhood Streets are characterized with having the sand concrete finish, but have an alternating five foot and two and half foot score pattern. North/south direction Neighborhood Streets will have the Crape Myrtle with understory planting within the tree well, whereas, the east/west direction streets will have the Marina Madrone with understory planting within the tree well. All Neighborhood Streets will include pedestrian only lights. North l South Street Tree: ffatchaz Crape Myrda, Legarst-dn Audits 'NaWhas' East 1 West Street Tree- Marina Mad-r Arbutus a 'Marine' Concrete Type I Pe&5;hlan Llght: DBMS Color Mesa $u€f Pedestma LED Light W/ Sandblast Finish Banner lit FrorRage Pedestrian Mility Zone Znne Fu isNngs Cub Zone Score joints — 5ft. And 2.5 ft. As required in the UTSP, the sidewalk improvements will happen as new development occurs, as a condition of approval. The draft UTSP Streetscape and Sidewalk Standards may be found in Attachment B of the corresponding Ordinance of this staff report. Pr000sed Amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan The proposed amendments to the UTSP include correcting typographical errors, clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, clarification for the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification for legal non -conforming uses, and the inclusion certain land uses as required by state law. During the initial adoption of the UTSP, specific language was crafted to protect property owners with newly created legal non -conforming land uses. Following the adoption of the UTSP in November 2015, additional clarification was requested by real estate brokers and land owners concerning the policies for legal non -conforming land uses, as it relates to parcels with multiple buildings and parcels with multiple tenants. As such, the policy for Legal Non -Conforming Land Uses was further clarified for situations when there is an individual parcel with a multi -tenant building that contains one or more legal non- conforming land use, or an individual parcel with multiple buildings and tenants where there is on or more legal non -conforming land use. In these situations, a property owner may lease a vacant suite or building to a similar non -conforming use, as permitted under the previous zoning, until such time that the building or buildings on site are occupied by only legally permitted uses, as allowed under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan for a period of twenty-four months or more. This policy allows flexibility for land owners consistent with the goals and objectives of Uptown Temecula as the area transitions from a suburban commercial uses into urban mixed use neighborhoods. The remaining proposed amendments are minor in nature and add clarification or correct typographical edits and are further outlined in Attachment A to corresponding Ordinance of this staff report. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the U-T San Diego on March 7, 2019. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR has been prepared, which concludes that the proposed changes, additions, or modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and/or mitigated in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified in November 2015 (SCH #2013061012). None of the conditions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that require the preparation of a subsequent EIR are present, and no additional environmental review is required. A Negative Declaration will be filed with the County Clerk of the Board. FINDINGS In recommending approval of Planning Application No. LR16-0223 and LR17-0724, the Planning Commission must make the following findings: A. The proposed specific plan is consistent with the general plan and development code. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the General Plan, as amended. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development in order to maintain the overall quality of life within the City. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non- conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. These amendments do not conflict with any goals, policies or standards of the Temecula General Plan and do not conflict with any goals, policies or development standards of the adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. B. The proposed specific plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan project has been reviewed by the Public Works and Fire Departments staff to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards do not change the land use designations or anticipated land use developments as proposed under the Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards provide clarifications development standards, state required land uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area. m D. The proposed specific plan amendments and Sidewalk Improvement Standards shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The approved Specific Plan is a form -based code which emphasizes the physical form of buildings to foster predictable built results as the organizing principle for the code, rather than focusing on the strict separation of uses. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards clarify development standards and requirements related to legal non -conforming uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area, thereby, ensuring the Specific Plan area will be developed in the desired character as anticipated with the adoption of the Specific Plan and continue to provide for a mix of land uses including commercial and residential uses, consistent with the surrounding area. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 19- 2. City Council Draft Ordinance No. 19- A. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments B. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan EIR Addendum 4. Notice of Public Hearing 19 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON -CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND TO ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN ARE EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17-0724)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 17, 2015, the Temecula City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and directed staff to prepare a streetscape beautification plan for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. B. In February of 2016, staff initiated the preparation of the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards and entered into an agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects to assist with the preparation of the streetscape and sidewalk standards. C. In April of 2017, staff identified a need to amend the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to make clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification of legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, and to make minor typographical edits. D. In July and August of 2017, staff along with Spurlock Landscape Architects held two community workshops to obtain the input into the development of sidewalk landscape standards. E. Throughout the process of preparing the UTSP Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards, staff met with the Planning Commission and City Council Ad -Hoc Subcommittees to present findings from the community workshops and the consultant's recommendations for incorporation into the UTSP Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. F. The City of Temecula Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2019, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Planning Application No. LR16-0223 and LR17-0724, hereby finds, determines and declares that: code. A. The proposed specific plan is consistent with the general plan and development The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the General Plan, as amended. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development in order to maintain the overall quality of life within the City. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a Streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. These amendments do not conflict with any goals, policies or standards of the Temecula General Plan and do not conflict with any goals, policies or development standards of the adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. B. The proposed specific plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan project has been reviewed by the Public Works and Fire Departments staff to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards do not change the land use designations or anticipated land use developments as proposed under the Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards provide clarifications development standards, state required land uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area. D. The proposed specific plan amendments and Sidewalk Improvement Standards shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The approved Specific Plan is a form -based code which emphasizes the physical form of buildings to foster predictable built results as the organizing principle for the code, rather than focusing on the strict separation of uses. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards clarify development standards and requirements related to legal non -conforming uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area, thereby, ensuring the Specific Plan area will be developed in the desired character as anticipated with the adoption of the Specific Plan and continue to provide for a mix of land uses including commercial and residential uses, consistent with the surrounding area. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In November 2015, the City Council certified an EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (State Clearing House#2013061012). Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared because some changes or additions to the certified EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present and therefore a subsequent EIR does not need to be prepared. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of March 2019. Gary Watts, Chairman ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 19- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of March 2019, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Luke Watson Secretary 17:7_1 ;k I CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 19- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON -CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND TO ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN ARE EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17-0724) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals and Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 17, 2015, the Temecula City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and directed staff to prepare a streetscape beautification plan for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. B. In February of 2016, staff initiated the preparation of the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards and entered into an agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects to assist with the preparation of the streetscape and sidewalk improvement standards. C. In April of 2017, staff identified a need to amend the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to make clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification of legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, and to make minor typographical edits. D. In July and August of 2017, staff along with Spurlock Landscape Architects held two community workshops to obtain the input into the development of sidewalk landscape standards. E. On March 20, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider whether to recommend the adoption of the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan, and the proposed Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. City staff presented a report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the proposed Project. At the conclusion of the March 6, 2019 Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission, including both an oral and written staff report and public comment, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 19- _, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON -CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND TO ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN ARE EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17- 0724 )" F. On 2019, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the proposed Project including the proposed amendments to the Specific Plan and the proposed Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The City Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the proposed Specific Plan amendment, and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards prior to and at the public hearing. SECTION 2. Legislative Findings. Based on the evidence and all other applicable information presented, the City Council makes the following findings regarding the Specific Plan: A. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.020(E), the City Council in amending the Specific Plan and adopting the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards finds determines and declares that: (1) The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the General Plan, as amended. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development in order to maintain the overall quality of life within the City. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non- conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. These amendments do not conflict with any goals, policies or standards of the Temecula General Plan and do not conflict with any goals, policies or development standards of the adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. (2) The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan project has been reviewed by the Public Works and Fire Departments staff to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non- conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. (3) The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards do not change the land use designations or anticipated land use developments as proposed under the Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards provide clarifications development standards, state required land uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area. (4) The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The approved Specific Plan is a form -based code which emphasizes the physical form of buildings to foster predictable built results as the organizing principle for the code, rather than focusing on the strict separation of uses. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards clarify development standards and requirements related to legal non -conforming uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area, thereby, ensuring the Specific Plan area will be developed in the desired character as anticipated with the adoption of the Specific Plan and continue to provide for a mix of land uses including commercial and residential uses, consistent with the surrounding area. SECTION 3. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment. A. The City Council hereby amends portions of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and directs staff to incorporate the changes as indicated in Exhibit "A" of this Ordinance. SECTION 4. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards_ A. The City Council hereby adopts the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Standards as shown in Exhibit "B" of this Ordinance, and amends the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to incorporate the Uptown Temecula Streetscape as a new Appendix "G" to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. SECTION 5. CEQA In November 2015, the City Council certified an EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (State Clearing House #2013061012). Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared because some changes or additions to the certified EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present and therefore a subsequent EIR does not need to be prepared. Staff is directed to file a Notice of Determination. SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or place, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the final decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Ordinance shall be and remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 8. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. EXHIBIT "A" Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments Exhibit A Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments Deleted text shown with stF*l(ethFeugh and- Red f.,.,+ New text shown with underline and blue font Chapter 2 Plan Administration C. Plan Applicability The regulations of this plan shall not apply to any application for a conditional use permit on a property within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area that was submitted to and deemed complete by the City's Community Development Department on or before April 28, 2015, but not yet approved, denied or conditionally approved by the City Council following a recommendation from the Planning Commission on or before the effective date of Ordinance No. 2015-13 approving this plan. In considering such an application, the City Council may impose reasonable conditions on the conditional use permit in order to mitigate the impact of the project that would otherwise be compatible with the allowable uses and development standards under the Plan, including, without limitation, the duration of the incompatible use and architectural design of the project. E. Legal Non -Conformities 2. Legal Non -Conforming Land Uses Any use of land that was lawfully established and in compliance with all applicable ordinances and laws at the time the use was established; however, due to a subsequently enacted ordinance or law, no longer complies with the applicable regulations or standards of the zone in which the use is located shall be considered a legal non -conforming use. Legal non -conforming uses that were legally established prior to the adoption of this specific plan are allowed to continue as they were, prior to the date of adoption of the specific plan. For an individual parcel with a multi -tenant buildine. or an individual Darcel with multiple buildings, where a legal non -conforming use exists on site, the property owner may lease a vacant suite or buildine to like non-conformine uses. as permitted under the previous zoninE. until such time that the building or buildings on site are occupied by only legally permitted uses as allowed under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan for a period of twenty-four months or more. Specific Plan Phased Compliance The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is expected to redevelop incrementally over a 20-year horizon as new development becomes economically feasible. As such, flexible development standards have been established based upon the scope of the proposed project as outlined in table 2-2. Table 2.2: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan - Phased Compliance Matrix Scope of Development Proposal Corresponding Planning Specific Plan Compliance Application Type Required Any project that proposes the Adaptive Reuse Application Adaptive Reuse Standards adaptive reuse of an existing building. A proposed change or modification to Sign Permit Architectural Design Guidelines the exterior of an existing building Sign Program without the addition of new square Minor Modification footage. 1 Major Modification Building additions totaling 10% or less Minor Modification Relative to the new addition only: • Architectural Design Guidelines of the existing square footage on a Major Modification project site in existence prior to the • Signage Standards adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Building additions greater than 10% Major Modification Relative to the new addition only: • Architectural Design Guidelines and up to 50% of the existing square footage on a project site in existence • Signage Standards prior to the adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. • Building Type Standards • Frontage Type Standards • Building Placement Standards • Maximum Building Height Standards • Parking Placement Standards • Minimum Parking Space Requirements Building additions greater than 50% of Major Modification All specific plan requirements the existing square footage on a apply (including land uses) project site in existence prior to the adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, or proposed additions which exceed 50% of the current market value of the existing structure (s) on a project site (as determined by an appraisal certification) New development proposals Development Plan All specific plan requirements apply (including land uses) 'Examples include: paint color changes, patio additions, addition of awnings, material changes, relocation of window and door, etc. Chapter 3 Land Use & Development Standards B. Land Use Regulations Table 3-1: Land Use Matrix List of Uses UHT US UA WH-RO 6 CV CV-CO6 MCR-OS Day care/preschool (commercial)' P P P P �P C C Residential care facilities (six or fewer)' P Residential care facilities (seven to twelve)' C Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer)' P Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven to twelve)' C FOOTNOTES: 'Subject to the Standards for Specific Uses outlined in Section 3.4-C. 6 All new development on a vacant parcel or redevelopment of a parcel within an Overlay area shall conform to the allowable uses of the Overlay as specified. Additionally, until such time that a parcel within an Overlay area is redeveloped by adding more than 50% of the existing square footage on the project site, or by proposed addition which exceeds 50% of the current market value of the existing structure(s) on site, (as specified in Table 2-2 of the UTSP), land uses within a legal non -conforming building may be those uses that are allowed within the underlying District, as specified in Table 3-1. F. Building and Parking Placement Standards The standards for building and parking placement are the same for all districts within the specific plan; however, the standards may vary depending on adjacent streets, freeway frontage and creek frontage. New buildings constructed in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area are required to be placed on a build -to line, adjacent to the street, to create a pedestrian scaled environment and facilitate a building's relationship to the public realm. The placement of buildings on the build -to -line may vary depending on the existing Right-of-Wav and street cross section as specified in Chapter 3.H Sidewalk Standards. Parking and Loading Facilities shall be placed on a site in accordance with the following requirements. G.,"R Exhibits 3-9 through 3-12 identifies the building and parking placement requirements for lots based on the geographic location within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan areas as follows: 1. Lots Fronting a New and/or Existing Street Table 3-10: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting a New or Existing Street Parking Placement Building Placement Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium 2,3 A Property Line to Build 10 ft. from property line N/A to Line Ream Interior Side B Yard Setback `'..� 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line With Alley — 0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley — 5 ft. from property line 50 ft. from the build -to line C Street Frontage 10 ft. behind the property line on (recommended)4 Setback' the build -to line 20 ft. from the build -to line (minimum)4 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. z When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50' minimum parking setback. Table 3-11: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting 1-15 Parking Placement Building Placement Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium 2,3 A Property Line to Build -to 10 ft. from property line N/A Line Ream Interior Side B Yard Setback (with or ;Afuthaut an alley4 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line With Alley-0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley — 5 ft. from property line C Freeway Frontage 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line 50 ft. from the build -to line D Street Frontage Setback 10 ft. behind the property line on the (recommended )° build -to line 20 ft. from the build -to line (min imum)4 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. z When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50' minimum parking setback. Table 3-12: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting Murrieta Creek Parking Placement Building Placement Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium 2,3 A Property Line to Build -to Line 10 ft. from property line N/A Rear or Interior Side Yard B Setback (with or without ^n 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line ^ice With Alley — 0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley — 5 ft. from Property line C Murrieta Creek Frontage 20 ft. from property line 0 20 ft. from property line D Street Frontage Setback 1 10 ft. behind the property line 50 ft. from the build -to line (recommended)4 on the build -to line 20 ft. from the build -to line (minimum)4 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. z When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50' minimum parking setback. Table 3-13: Building and Parking Placement Standards for Lots Fronting Santa Gertrudis Creek Parking Placement Building Placement Surface, tuck under, alley loaded, garage, and podium 2,3 A Property Line to Build -to 10 ft. from property line N/A Line Rear or Interior Side B Yard Setback (with e 0 ft. from property line 0 ft. from property line With Alley-0 ft. from property line B Rear Yard Setback 0 ft. from property line Without Alley-5 ft. from Property line Santa Gertrudis Creek C 20 ft. from property line 0 20ft. from property line Frontage 50 ft. from the build -to line (recommended)4 Street Frontage Setback 10 ft. behind the property line U 1 on the build -to line 20 ft. from the build -to line (minimum)4 1 Parking setbacks apply to all stories of the building, except the rooftop deck of a parking structure. z When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street. 3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street. 4At least one street frontage shall be required to have a 50' minimum parking setback. H. Sidewalk Standards The sidewalks are intended to establish the pedestrian as the priority from curb to storefront. The functionality of a walkable district is achieved through logical streetscape design and compliance with uniform sidewalk standards. The sidewalk design standards emphasize the importance of the placement of buildings in relation to the sidewalk, street and public realm. Consequently, the sidewalk design standards take a two -pronged approach \ r r r i f � r � to sidewalk design: 1) they outline �Ae J%a requirements for the property located Fi, d°Say eZOner�L'�e within the public right-of-way, and 2) �Shn 10% 3 they provide requirements for the space C�\ 2One ar`es� located on private property between the property line and build -to line. In order to achieve adequate sidewalk width to accommodate pedestrian movement, all development projects shall be required to comply with the sidewalk cross sections show in Exhibit 3-15. Several of the street cross sections are shown havine more than 10 feet within the Rieht-of-way. In these circumstances, if the building is placed ten feet behind the property line (or on the "Build - to Line") as required is Chapter 3, Section F, the full sidewalk width would be greater than 20 feet. Due to the approved street cross sections and existing Right -of -Way, the placement of the buildings may vary in order to achieve a 20-foot sidewalk. Examole: The Jefferson Avenue Cross Section Area 2-13 (Section 3-H) shows the sidewalk area within the Right -of -Way as 12 feet. A developer that is required to build the sidewalk between the face of the building and the Right -of -Way may be allowed to place the building at eight feet behind the property line, in order to comply with the intent of the Specific Plan for having 20-foot sidewalks. I. Street Cross Section Standards The existing streets within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include Jefferson Avenue, Winchester Road, Enterprise Circle North, Enterprise Circle South, Commerce Center Drive, Overland Drive, Del Rio Road, Calle Cortez, Las Haciendas, Via Montezuma, Ryder Way, Beuking Road, Sanborn Avenue, Madison Avenue and McCabe Court. Cross section standards have been developed for the existing streets to transform them into more complete streets with on -street parking, bike lanes, and wider sidewalks. The following cross section standards were designed to fit within the existing right -of way and curb -to -curb widths of the above mentioned streets, eliminating the need to widen streets and relocate utilities. These cross sections are to be used when the City prepares its Capital Improvement Program for re - striping and when a developer is required, as part of a development project, to construct the remaining improvements as a condition of approval. A new street that is proposed or required as part of a new development project shall be connected to another new or existing street and/or alley. `4hep a mev.f street is pFepesed, the new street _Mreet^r of °, h1mr `^ Arki; When a new street is proposed, the new street cross section shall be 1) one of the approved cross sections from this Plan, 2) compatible with the connecting street design, and 3) subject to the review and approval of the City's Traffic Engineer and Director of Piihlir \A/nrkc Chapter 5 Design Guidelines E. Utility Guidelines 1. Existing and New Water Service Design Considerations: Underground water plans should —shall be provided to the City to allow Community Development staff to verify the proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check (DDCs) prior to final agreement with the utility companies. ii. Double detector check valves sheer shall be placed above ground to meet Rancho California Water District's Standard Drawing RW-20. Double detector checks s#aefd shall be installed in a location that is internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of- way, or placed in a manner that is architecturally integrated into the building design. iii. The placement of DDCs and other water related utilities in alleyways, parking lots, or within a building "notch out" (internal to the project site) is encouraged to better integrate the utility equipment into the building's architectural design. iv. DDCs and other water related utilities sheeld shall not be placed adjacent to the sidewalk along the building facades that face the street. This will ensure safe and comfortable pedestrian path of travel along the sidewalks. V. Compact, vertical DDC's should be used whenever feasible. vi. Landscape construction drawings sad shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. A three-foot clear zone should be provided around fire double detector checks as required by the Riverside County Fire Department. Utility equipment should be grouped together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an afterthought. vii. DDCs and other water utility equipment should shall be placed on private property and not within the right of way. Easements should be obtained for DDCs and other water utility equipment when they are placed on private property. viii. Fire Department connections shall be wall mounted on the street side of the building. 2. Existing and New Electrical Service Design Considerations: i. As required by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 04-02, all new electrical lines up to 34 Kv shall be under -grounded. ii. All utility equipment shall be located out of the pedestrian path of travel. All electrical utility equipment, electrical meters, and junction boxes aFe eRE;Gwraged +^ shall be placed within a utility room. If a utility room is not feasible or appropriate, ensure that then all utility equipment is- shall be purposefully and aesthetically designed as an integral part of the building, placed adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, or within rear or side yards and screened from public view. ++ E)theF utility equipmeRt Shall -he achieved by eRGE)HPagiRg that all eqUipMeRt be plaGed adjaceRt W alleyways, WithiR PaFI(iRg areas, WithiR Fear er side yardS, OF *R a bUild*Rg "REAGh eu+ r III utility equipment shne--I.J he I.,ra+peal ne-ut nef+he pedestrian path of travel iv. Early coordination with Southern California Edison should occur in order to ensure that transformers are placed in a manner that makes the least aesthetic impact, and to ensure that transformers are well screened and in compliance with utility provider's standards. 3 Existing and New Natural Gas Service Design Considerations: Ensure safe ingress and egress to gas meters for maintenance, meter reading, and service while simultaneously encouraging the placement of equipment that makes the least aesthetic impact to the built environment. +k All utility equipment shall be located out of the pedestrian path of travel. All utility equipment shall be purposefully and aesthetically placed adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, rear or side yards, or within building "notch outs" and screened from public view. Purpeseful -and _;4esthetically integrated placement ef gas Mete.rs aand ether utility equipment shn---dr-1 be _;ir--hieved by enceuragiRg that all equipment be placed adjacent te equipment sh. uld be le-catn.J eut of the pedestrian path of travel iii. Gas meters should shall be well screened and in compliance with utility provider's standards. A 3-foot wide minimum clearance should be provided when landscaping is utilized as the screening method. iv. When appropriate, gas meters ;hn-dd shall be painted to blend into the built environment. V. Consultation with Southern California Gas regarding meter cabinet design guidelines and appropriate screening methods should occur early in the project design process. EXHIBIT "B" Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 9jmffafili:js(llr. * r41 AI January 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Design Intent 3.0 Design Standards 35 4.0 Appendix 125 INTRODUCTION 1 0 Introduction 1.1 Project Background. Framework and References 1.2 Purpose: Importance of Sidewalk Improvement Standards 7 1.3 Relationship to City Landscape Standards 8 1.4 Applicability of Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 8 1.5 How to use this Document 9 1.0 INTRODUCTION The recently adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan establishes a vision and excellent framework for the development of exciting new bicycle and pedestrian friendly urban neighborhoods, with opportunities for living, working, shopping and a wide range of recreational activities. Set between the Wilder Hills to the west and vibrant commercial and residential development and the lush tranquility of the wine country to the east, Uptown Temecula has two distinct frontages—Murrieta Creek with its trails and lovely riparian habitat and the I-15 corridor, busy with local and regional commuters and visitors. The Uptown Temecula District is well -positioned to make the most of these adjacencies, harnessing their distinct but complementary characteristics. Regional Context Diagram The Project location encompasses areas of the community that were developed at different times under largely informal streetscape plans. As such, the condition of the public spaces and associated streetscape infrastructure vary considerably. The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards focus on improvements to public rights -of -way, including streets, sidewalks and gateways. It will identify public street design elements, landscaping, intersection enhancements, entry treatments, and other unique public realm features within the various districts of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Focusing on the public right-of-way, these standards attempt to balance pedestrian needs with vehicular and bicycle needs. It is not the intent to provide specific street geometric design standards. Rather, it is to provide design -oriented treatments of the public realm. Site Context and Character Diagram Existing Conditions: Minimal Pedestrian Amenities Existing Conditions: Discontinuous sidewalks Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background, Framework and References The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are an addendum to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (UTSP) which was developed with extensive community input to determine the best land uses and development standards necessary to create a new and vibrant Uptown Temecula. The Specific Plan is a form - based development code which provides for a range of uses including mixed use residential development, access to open space and recreational areas, and improved pedestrian, bicycle, vehicular mobility and connectivity. The form -based code focuses on building form, building placement, and the creation of a pedestrian scale environment. Accordingly, the Specific Plan calls for streets that achieve a better balance between the needs of pedestrians, bicycles, cars and public transit and achieve the community's vision for a bicycle and pedestrian friendly urban experience. " u EA—g R. edwa N ,.�,o,kan 3 � go Z\,/ the Specific Plan calls for streets that 6' achieve a better balance between the % needs of pedestrians, bicycles, cars and public transit... � Existing Roadway Network To accomplish this goal, the existing right-of-way (ROW) and curb -to -curb street cross sections were evaluated to determine if on -street parking, bicycle facilities, and 20-foot sidewalks were feasible throughout the Specific Plan area. The result was a series of 44 new street cross sections that include 20-foot sidewalks, on -street parking, bicycle facilities, curb bulb -outs at intersections, bus turn -outs, and painted or raised medians. The new cross sections fit within the existing ROW and curb -to -curb sections, enabling the existing street cross sections to be retrofitted with the new street cross sections without acquiring additional ROW or the need to widen any of the existing streets. Future Hypothetical Street (arid Network New streets were added to the Specific Plan in order to create a grid pattern street network with smaller blocks and increased connectivity creating more pedestrian friendly and walkable neighborhoods and improved mobility throughout the Specific Plan area. The location of new streets is proposed as a hypothetical street network to allow for flexibility in their location as development occurs. The hypothetical street network will be constructed as new development occurs where new block size standards are exceeded. The highest priority new streets are those that help complete overall connectivity within the District for example by resolving existing cul-de-sacs (as within the Sports District), creating strong Neighborhood connector streets (as at Commerce Center Drive) and completing connections to the community from west to east (as at Overland Drive). Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1.2 Purpose: Importance of Sidewalk Improvement Standards The Specific Plan defines a series of sub -districts or neighborhoods, interconnected by the existing street rights of way, as well as additional proposed streets, all configured to create a generous pedestrian and bike -oriented network. Based on the Specific Plan Recommendations and Goals, the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are intended to provide standards and direction for implementation of the various hardscape and planting components of the pedestrian realm to ensure consistency and continuity of character and materials in the realization of the community's vision for Uptown Temecula. Sidewalk Improvement Guideline objectives are to: 1. Create public improvements that support Mixed and Flexible Land Uses and are activated day and night • Consider strategies for implementation over an extended time period • Reinforce framework defined in the Specific Plan for knitting together pedestrian improvements within the Right of Way to the building frontage. • Define hardscape and planting material standards that are distinctive, but economical and easily maintained 2. Create an environment that encourages walking, improves multi -modal mobility and connectivity including to open space and trails • Provide minimum 5' wide pedestrian walkways, clear of obstructions, throughout all the neighborhoods of the Uptown Specific Plan • Provide crosswalks at intersections to allow for improved pedestrian connections • Connect to existing and proposed multi - modal trails • Locate site furnishings in well-defined zones that do not obstruct pedestrian traffic flow Establish District Identity —and define sub - districts and neighborhoods —with a streetscape improvement program that provides continuity and cohesive character that connects to Temecula's particular sense of place. • Provide standards for paving materials, finishes and patterns to ensure consistency throughout the Specific Plan area. • Provide plant palettes for each District throughout the Specific Plan area • Provide a framework for identity signage, public art and District -specific enhancements Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 7 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.3 Relationship to City Landscape Standards The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards apply throughout the Uptown Temecula specific Plan area and provide design standards for improvements within the public right-of-way. These Standards supplement the Landscape Design Requirements within the City of Temecula Municipal Code. City of Temecula Municipal Code, Section 17.32.060, Landscape Design Requirements. City of Temecula City Wide Design Guidelines (2005) Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (2015) Multi -use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan (2016) City of Temecula General Plan (2005) 1.4 Applicability of Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards All future development and land use proposals located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan project boundaries, shall be governed by the requirements of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. No development shall be undertaken without prior approval and issuance of the appropriate development entitlement or land use permit pursuant to the administration provisions of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. These regulations apply to all new development and modifications to existing developments as provided herein and as provided in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The City of Temecula recognizes that some sites may have challenges complying with regulations herein, as not all circumstances of future proposed projects can be anticipated; therefore, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan provides for minor exceptions and variances within certain parameters, as discussed in Section F of the Specific Plan. Compliance with the Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards is required when new development is proposed or building additions greater than 10% of the existing square footage on a project site are proposed. This is consistent with the Phased Compliance schedule of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which requires specific compliance with the Plan based upon the scope of the proposed project, as outlined in Table 2-2 of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. 8 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards z 1.0 INTRODUCTIO 1.5 How to Use this Document Section: ❑esiap Intent 2.0 The Design Intent 2.0 section is organized by street typologies outlining design intent and overall framework. Enhanced intersections are required at all intersecting streets. Some intersections are intended to incorporate bulb -outs, enhanced paving materials, wayfinding features, iconic signage, or public art and act as gateways into neighborhoods and the greater Uptown Temecula area. When designing or reviewing a project, first review the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Street Cross Sections and then the Gateway exhibit and Enhanced Intersections and Gateways exhibits of this document to determine the type of enhancements and design feature intended for an intersection. Section: Design Standards .0 The Design Standards 3.0 section complies typical plans showing hardscape and planting material selections for each street type, organized by district. Section: Appendix 4.0, The Appendix 4.0 section includes additional technical specifications, descriptions and product information. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards DESIGN INTENT Design Intent 2.1 District Neighborhoods 2.2 Neighborhood Themes 2.3 District Gateways 2.4 Street Typologies 2.5 Sidewalk Zones 13 13 13 18 22 25 2.6 Enhanced Intersections and Gateway Bulb -outs 28 2.7 Hardscape Framework 30 2.8 Street Trees and Understory Planting 32 2.0 DESIGN INTEN 2.0 DESIGN INTENT These regulations apply to all new development and modifications to existing devetopmerits as provided herein and as provided in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The City of Temecula recognizes that some sites may have challenges complying with regulations herein, as not all circumstances of future proposed projects can be anticipated; therefore, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan provides for minor exceptions and variances within certain parameters, as discussed in Section F of the Specific Plan. 2.1 District Neighborhoods The neighborhoods defined in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan are the basis for organizing the Standards. Each zoning district and overlay zone has specific land uses and development standards which vary slightly by district in order to achieve differences between the districts. The boundaries of each district and overlay zone were established based on the existing land uses, geographic and surrounding physical features, and the desired vision of the community. Each neighborhood defines its unique signature through the selection of sidewalk paving materials, street trees, lighting and site furnishings. Uptown Center District, Uptown Hotel and Tourism District, Uptown Sports and Transit District, Uptown Arts District, and Creekside Village District as well as two overlays: Wilder Hills Residential and Creekside Commercial Overlay. 2.2 Neighborhood Themes Uptown Center District Uptown Center District is considered to be the urban heart of the Uptown Temecula area. Characterized by multi -story mixed -use buildings lining both sides of Jefferson Avenue the District contains two important gateway intersections at Overland Drive and Winchester Road, intended to convey a strong sense of arrival and sense of place for those entering the Uptown Temecula area by public transit, car, bicycle, or on foot. Capitalizing on its visual window from Interstate 15, and its strong accessibility from the freeway, the district is intended to become Temecula's employment hub and the Region's financial district attracting large, high -quality employers. The residential presence will synergistically attract and support the nearby commercial uses, further contributing to the area's vibrant urban character. Enhanced connectivity and walkability will become key components of the area's character and aesthetic urban feel and the density of future development will eventually support expanded transit service. Uptown 7bmecula Specific Plan District Map Creekside VilIgge Commercial Overla With a strong visual window from Interstate-15 and within easy walking distance of adjacent Uptown Hotel/ Tourism District, Creekside Village and Utown Art Districts, The Creekside Village Commercial Overlay zone Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 13 2.0 DESIGN INTENT Uptown H pteI / Tourism District Capitalizing and building upon the existing cluster of hotels, restaurants and oLliei visiLui-serving land uses within this area, the Uptown Hotel/Tourism District is the principal hospitality -oriented, visitor and tourist serving district. Located at the major southern gateway into the specific plan area, just north of Old Town and east of Murrieta Creek, the District character will convey a sense of arrival into a markedly urban neighborhood also influenced by the more rustic character of the creek setting. Visitors to this area will be able to easily walk to the nearby Murrieta Creek trail, Creekside Village Commercial Overlay and Old Town to visit the nearby shops and restaurants. Consequently, pedestrian oriented intersection improvements are planned at the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Rancho California Road to better accommodate multi -modal connectivity, promote safety, and facilitate easy walkability or biking. o s / Transit District Located to the east of the future Regional Park and recreation facility, and with a strong visual window from Interstate 15, this district is characterized by mid to high rise urban buildings with new streets to further enhance connectivity and circulation. Adjacent to the northernmost gateway into the Specific Plan area, the District character will communicate a strong sense of arrival into Uptown Temecula. The District is bound by the Santa Gertrudis Creek and adjacent Murrieta Creek trail to the south and its character will support and complement the adjacent regional park facility with a mix of land uses including hotel and guest -serving facilities, commercial, and retail uses. In combination with urban residential dwellings, the neighborhood will be active day, evenings and weekends, and the nearby park facility will provide an amenity for visitors and residents. Enhanced pedestrian crossings and refuge islands are envisioned at key intersections along Jefferson Avenue to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and safe access across Jefferson Avenue to the park site to the west. Given its location relative to Interstate 15 and on the border with Murrieta, this district may accommodate a future transit station, anticipated to provide for both high frequency public transit service and bus rapid transit service. In anticipation of this future facility, the Uptown Sports/Transit District encourages Transit Oriented Development (TOD) characterized by clusters of compact, walkable, urban development. Uptown Center District illustrative Photo Uptown Hotel / Thurism IDustrative Photo Uptown Sports / 77ansit illustrative Photo C — f 14 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Uptown Arts District The Uptown Arts District is envisioned to become the vibrant and eclectic cultural arts destination in the Uptown Temecula area. In order to establish the Uptown Arts District as Temecula's cultural arts hub, this area is intended to accommodate a variety of arts - related land uses such as art galleries, artist lofts, work spaces, and various performance venues, as well as a mix of urban residential units, including live/ work spaces stimulating pedestrian activity within the area during the day, evenings and weekends. The Uptown Art District's character is eclectic and artsy vibe reflecting the diverse land use mix within the neighborhood. Commerce Center Drive is intended to promote walkability, cycling and a pedestrian friendly environment within the district's central core. Future streetscape improvements along Commerce Center Drive are envisioned to provide safe pedestrian crossings and traffic calming features to further enhance this street's pedestrian -oriented character. Additionally, this district's close proximity to Murrieta Creek and the adjacent Murrieta Creek trail system will provide an outdoor amenity to be enjoyed by the nearby residential dwellings and the art -related uses. Creekside VillagA District The character of this District will be defined as high -density urban residential in a mix of building types. Limited neighborhood -serving commercial uses are anticipated to complement the residential development. The residential population within this District will activate the area during the day, evenings and weekends. The streets and sidewalks are designed to maximize pedestrian comfort and safety, making walking and biking the preferred mode of transportation for short trips. It is anticipated that a number of new street connections will be constructed as development occurs in the future to better accommodate pedestrian walkability, enhance way -finding, promote area -wide connectivity, and develop a more defined street grid pattern within the specific plan area. Wilder Hills Residential Overlay This area's character will be defined by low rise residential dwellings of up to 3 stories in height and is intended to provide a walkable residential neighborhood nestled between a local cultural arts cluster and Murrieta Creek. This overlay area is the only fully residential area within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area and the character of this area will be achieved through compact residential development that promotes walking and biking to destinations such as the adjacent Murrieta Creek recreational trail and shopping, eating establishments, and employment located in close proximity to residential neighborhood. 2.0 DESIGN INTEN Uptown Arts District Nustrative Photo Creekside Village R/ustretive Photo Wilder Hills Residential Overlay Illustrative Photo Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 15 is primarily a commercial area, capitalizing on its visibility from the freeway by providing commercial uses along this visual window. Ground floor uses are commercial establishments such as specialty shops and restaurants to activate the public realm and create a retail -oriented, walkable pedestrian corridor along Jefferson Avenue. Streetscape components are specifically designed to enhance the pedestrian experience and overall aesthetic image of this area from Interstate 15. Creekside Village Commercial Overlay Illustrative Photo 16 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTEN This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 17 2.3 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Gateways The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is defined by a series of gateways which welcome and orient residents and visitors to the area as a whole as well as the distinct Districts within. The Gateways are classified as Primary, Secondary and Tertiary. (n. LEGEND 0 l l O •o*-*-, ABCD 1, .1- FigureX.X Gateway Diagram to Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTEN Many of the gateways include iconic components such as District signage or public art. General criteria for these components are described below and in accompanying diagrams and plan graphics. These iconic components will be further defined in concert with future developments with input from the community and stakeholders as part of overall Neighborhood visioning, wayfinding and branding. Gateways should be treated with a consistent material palette as articulated in the hardscape and planting palettes described in Chapters 3 and 4 of this document. Additional strategies for providing a framework/ infrastructure for future implementation include identifying areas for accent paving that does not disturb the patterning and cohesiveness of standard sidewalk paving; providing streetlights with capabilities for banners, flowerpots, festival lights and other amenities; ensuring the layout of sidewalk bulb -outs have adequate space for public art or other unique features without impeding the flow of pedestrian traffic. The function and character of each of these gateways is described below: Primary Gateways: A: South and North Jefferson, Median gateways These form the major entries to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. Using the same defining character they are framed by buildings to the east and the Murrieta Creek open space with a multi -use trail to the west. They are also linear gateways, described by a sequence of distinct and iconic streetscape components. The east side of the gateway follows the streetscape standards for Jefferson Avenue, the Major District Connector Street. The adjacency to open space and trail provides a unique opportunity for a more generously planted allee flanking a pedestrian/bike trail on the west side. In addition, per the Specific Plan, these gateway locations will include medians wide enough to accommodate accent trees and understory planting as well as iconic District feature(s) such as signage, accent lighting and/or public art. Murrieta Creekside pedestrian Gateway Illustrative Graphic Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 19 2.0 DESIGN INTENT �, ,�,— R: Overland and Winchester Gateways The intersections of Jefferson Avenue with these two Community Connector streets comprise major entry points from Temecula neighborhoods to the east of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. These gateways are marked by enhanced paving in the vehicular intersections, as well as iconic District feature(s) such as signage, accent lighting and/or public art at the sidewalk bulb -outs. Secondary Gateways: C:_Uotown Arts District Gateways Commerce Center Drive intersects Overland Drive and Winchester Road over its length, creating District gateways for visitors and residents travelling east and west through the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. These gateways are marked by accent paving, planting and iconic public art and/or signage. The gateways should be visible from Jefferson Avenue as a break in the standard streetscape—a flash of color or the distinct materiality of public art or neighborhood signage, communicating the Uptown Arts District as a place with unique character and culture. D: Del Rio "Y" The intersection of Jefferson Avenue and Del Rio Road forms the southern gateway to the Creekside Village District as well as an important point of confluence between the more urban and retail -oriented character to the east along Jefferson Avenue, and the quieter, more Creek -influenced character along Del Rio Road to the west. This gateway is identified by accent paving and planting at the sidewalk bulb -outs. E: Montezuma Gateway Via Montezuma intersects Jefferson Avenue at the midpoint of a gentle bow to the west. This forms an important boundary between the Uptown Arts and Creekside Commercial Districts. This gateway is an important opportunity for wayfinding signage indicating the neighborhoods that lie to the west. F. untoci�n Sports/ Transit District Ga teway_s Located at the intersections of Jefferson Avenue and McCabe Court, Buecking Drive and Sanborn Avenue, these District gateways are easy to spot for visitors arriving by foot, bike or car. They face the future sports fields on the west side of Jefferson Avenue and reflect the vibrant, urban feel of the Uptown Center District just to the south. These gateways are marked by accent paving at the sidewalks and a change in street trees. Tertiary Gateways: G: Creekside Cymi 1 Gateways Intersecting Jefferson Avenue at nearly the narrowest part of the District in the heart of the Creekside Commercial Overlay area, La Hacienda Street and Calle Cortez are gateways that communicate the proximity to Murrieta Creek which lies just to the west. Accent plant materials are native or naturalizing and signage and hardscape elements incorporate natural materials such as stone and weathering steel. H: Murrieta. Empire and San _Gertrudis Creek Gateways The planned intersections of Winchester Road, Overland Drive and Via Montezuma (future pedestrian/ bike connection) with Diaz Road form important gateways to both the Murrieta Creek corridor as well as the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area beyond. This close proximity between Uptown Temecula and the Murrieta Creek corridor is communicated at these gateways through the use of native and riparian accent plant materials and district signage that uses natural materials that reflect that character of the local landscape. Empire and San Gertrudis Creeks are traversed by Jefferson Avenue. Riparian planting and/or public art or iconic elements should communicate this overlay of natural and built infrastructure. 20 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTEN This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 21 2.4 Uptown Temecula Street Typologies Streets within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area have been classified as a Major District Connector, Minor District Connector, Neighborhood Street or Community Connector. These categories were determined based on street cross section, location and adjacent uses. LEGEND •Geode• <........... TN 14UU Jl:HLt Street Typology Diagram 22 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards LA 2.0 DESIGN INTEN Typical plans of specific streets can be found in Chapter 3, organized by District and street typology. These should be used to determine Guideline requirements. Additional detailed material descriptions and specifications can be found in the Appendix. Note, not all streets in a given classification will have the same material requirements. r 1 r Ash v.} � r major Dis not_Capnector - The Major District Connector street is Jefferson Avenue, nearly two miles long and Uptown Temecula's Main Street, threading through 4 Districts and connecting to Old Town to the south and Murrieta to the north. It is a major vehicular access route through the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area as well as a significant civic street. Its character changes slightly over its length as it moves through various Districts. The streetscape components are graphically bold and designed to be legible from vehicles as well as from a pedestrian -oriented perspective. rFt-�r "q I {nll�,,.ry..... � y I I 21K. . -°,t' }. I1f I A A Min r Di trio o,nnector These streets form the major circulation spines of each District and because of their length and scale, communicate the unique character of individual neighborhoods. Minor District Connector streets also include Winchester Road and Overland Drive which span the adjacent Interstate 15 and Murrieta Creek, connecting Uptown Temecula to the adjacent residential and commercial neighborhoods. - - - -........... - Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 23 Neighborhood 5treeC These streets are smaller scale, pedestrian -oriented and important for building the character of a particular neighborhood and providing a walkable network within the District. 1- •-• 24 — Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.5 Sidewalk Zones idewalks within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area are divided into four zones, two of which are in the public right of way and are the purview of these standards. In order to achieve adequate sidewalk width to accommodate pedestrian movement, all development projects shall be required to comply with the two sidewalk cross sections shown in the Specific Plan and illustrated below. These standards specifically address hardscape, planting and site furnishings within the pedestrian and utility zones. As described in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, the intent of the Streetscape Guidelines is to achieve a unified public realm that also accommodates unique project conditions and encourages a vibrant and eclectic public realm. The Frontage Zone provides opportunity for businesses and developments to incorporate furnishings, and entourage that reflect their unique character and the specific program needs of ground floor tenants. While site elements within the Frontage Zone are not included in the guidelines, this document provides recommendations and alternative scenarios for extending standard paving treatments described in these Sidewalk Standards to the Build -to Line in order to achieve a cohesive underlying fabric for the public realm. See conceptual scenarios and descriptions below. Public realm sidewalk paving within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area has been designed with a graphically strong but geometrically simple and flexible banded pattern in order to more easily accommodate project -specific components such as recessed entries, colonnades and accent paving. N Required Sidewalk Cross Section, ] Required Sidewalk Cross Section, 2 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 25 Sidewalk Frontage Zone Layouts Scenario 1 Shows a building with accent paving at its recessed entry threshold extending into the frontage zone creating an entry "carpet" of accent paving. The recessed entry and accent paving are well -coordinated with the public realm paving so that score joints are aligned. Note that accent paving could extend all the way to the property line, but should never extend into the pedestrian zone. • Align Building Openings / Recesses and Accent Paving with Sidewalk with Paving Score Joints Note: Sidewalk Paving Score Joints Width may be Adjusted to Align to Provide Equal Space Across Recess +/- 6" Per Panel Pa t 7 1 PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ACCENT PAVING DISTRICT STANDARD PAVING Scenario 2 Shows a building with accent paving at its entry threshold that stops at the "Build -to" Line. In this case, the recessed entry is not aligned with the score joint pattern of the public realm paving. The transition between the two is addressed with a flush band of paving that separates the two materials and patterns. This could be smooth concrete or a soldier band of unit pavers depending on the accent paving material. • Misaligned Building Openings / Recesses • Provide Transitional Flush Curb at Back of Build -to -Line �0 PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ACCENT PAVING DISTRICT STANDARD PAVING FLUSH CURB Fumishings Pedestrian Utility Zone Zone Zone 9.5' 6' 4' 6' i i i CAN EXTEND w TO R.O.Wi LINE O r I d i a �w �a a -- ROW —► 1 /16" = V SCALE Furnishings Pedestrian Utility Zone Zone Zone 9 5' 6• 4' 6' a C7 f I z 0 m 1/16" = V SCALE 26 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards - 2.0 DESIGN INTEN Sidewalk Frontage Zone Layouts Scenarios 3 + 4 Scenarios 3 and 4 show buildings with colonnades or similar extension into the frontage zone. In each case, accent paving, columns and public realm paving, while not perfectly aligned, are adjusted and coordinated to minimize visual disruption of the unified public realm paving. SCENARIO 3 • Align Columns /Accent Paving with Sidewalk Paving Score Joints QPRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ACCENT PAVING DISTRICT STANDARD PAVING SCENARIO 4 • Misaligned Columns / Accent Paving • Provide Transitional Flush Curb to align with R.O.W. Align �+ // or Sidewalk Score Joints [�1�} PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT ACCENT PAVING DISTRICT STANDARD PAVING Frontage Pedestrian Furnishing Zone Zone Zone 95 6 4' 6" BUILDING COLUMN COLUMN I � i . R.O W.—► 1/16" = 'I'SCALE Frontage Pedestrian Furnishing Zone Zone Zone 9 5' 6' 4' 6' I BUILDING COLUMN Z tNNG COLUMN r I r 1 D: IL a I a —ROWS 1/16" = 1' SCALE Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 27 2.0 DESIGN INTENT 2.6 Enhanced Intersections and Bulb -outs In addition to the framework for sidewalk zones described in Section 2.5 above, the Specific Plan also calls for enhanced intersections and bulb -outs to be located at key intersections throughout the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area and the Uptown Specific Plan Street Cross Sections should be referenced for locations. The bulb -outs serve several functions including enhancing pedestrian safety by slowing traffic and reducing the length of crosswalks; providing space for wayfinding elements such as accent trees, signage and gateway elements; creating pocket plazas for seating and pedestrian comfort. This document identifies key locations for enhanced intersections and bulb -outs; the final locations will be determined by the City in concert with future development. Note many bulb -out locations align with the Gateways as identified in Section 2.3, Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Gateways. Indeed the hardscape and planting treatments of these bulb -outs, intersections and crosswalks work together to reinforce neighborhood identity. Enhanced Intersection with accent planting Required Sidewalk Cross Section, 3 Bulb -Out with accent paving and crosswalks Intersection with signage All enhanced intersection and bulb -out designs are illustrated in Section 3.0 Design Standards which outlines the materials and design to be implemented per District. The City of Temecula Engineering and Construction Manual should also be referenced for all horizontal and vertical configurations, vision triangle clearances, setbacks and other design parameters associated with the enhanced intersection and bulb -out design. 28 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 29 2.7 Uptown Temecula Hardscape Framework Each street typology, enhanced intersection and bulb -out within the Temecula Specific Plan as described in Sections 2.4 and 2.6 have associated hardscape materials and layouts. LEGEND sees@@@ 0 0 0 <........... Street Typology Diagram 30 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards -W 2.0 DESIGN INTENT his document outlines a family of hardscape paving materials and score joint patterns that provide a harmonious and consistent streetscape while allowing flexibility to highlight accent areas of interest. Specified materials for public sidewalk include integral color concrete with contrasting finishes, precast concrete unit pavers in utility furnishing zones and enhanced asphalt at pedestrian crosswalks. Chapter 3 includes typical layout plans with material descriptions, organized by District and street typology. Paving layout and materials are designed with a graphically strong but geometrically simple and flexible banded pattern in order to facilitate implementation over time, support projects with a wide range of architectural character and accommodate site specific components adjacent to the public realm such as building projections and site walls. Reference Section 2.6 for the Street Typology and the Temecula Specific Plan for all bulb -out locations. In addition to standard paving treatments, this document identifies accent areas that might include special inset paving related to building entries or cafe zones (as described in Section 2.5) or enhanced paving or public art at neighborhood gateways (as described in Section 2.3). Specific design for these accent paving treatments will be defined in concert with future development in support of the District characteristics defined in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 31 2.0 DESIGN INTENT, 2.8 Uptown Temecula Street Trees and Understory Planting LEGEND Street Ree Diagram L � _ _— 32 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 2.0 DESIGN INTEN Street trees throughout the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area reinforce community character, improve air quality, sequester carbon, improve storm water treatment and collection, increase storm water uptake and filtration, reduce the urban heat island effect, reduce electricity and shade requirements and other sustainable features. A sustainable urban forest utilizes a variety of trees for increased disease resistance and a diversity of ecosystems. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area Street Tree and understory plant species are organized to reinforce the character of the various Districts. Species pull from a range of contextual influences including the riparian trees and grasses of Murrieta Creek; the native trees and understory planting of the surrounding Wilder Hills; the character of Temecula agricultural and wine regions as well as the sophisticated urban character of the Promenade Temecula. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area Street Tree framework reinforces the unique character of districts and Overlay areas while allowing a level of flexibility and resiliency to the urban canopy by providing a healthy mix of species. Chapter 3 includes detailed description of plant materials and locations. New trees to be installed shall have a minimum box size of 36". Healthy soil conditions shall be created through excavation and soil remediation and amendments. Each tree shall have a minimum root zone of 40 square feet and 36" depth per tree. District standard tree grates and tree wells are sized to achieve this minimum root zone. The Large Canopy trees associated with the Major District Connector B Street Typology will utilize Silva Cell units to ensure prolonged tree healthy and structural support within these areas. Refer to Section 2.4 for the Street Typology locations and to Section 4.0 for the Silva Cell product information. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 33 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.0 Design Standards 37 3.1 Layout Plans and Materials by District 39 3.1.1 Uptown Center District 39 3.1.2 Uptown Hotel / Tourism District 49 3.1.3 Uptown Sports / Transit District 61 3.1.4 Uptown Arts District 75 3.1.5 Creekside Village District 81 3.1.6 Gateways: Enhanced Intersections and Bulb -Outs. all Districts 89 3.2 Site Materials 3.2.1 Street Lights 118 3.2.2 Tree Grates 118 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting 120 120 3.3 Additional Site Elements 3.3.1 Site Furnishings 121 121 3.3.2 Utilities and Equipment in the ROW 121 3.3.3 Bus Shleters 121 3.0 DESIGN STANDARD 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS In order ensure a consistent public realm that unifies the many different developments and Districts within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, the Sidewalk Standards document defines materials and layout for key streetscape site elements. Each District is organized around a hierarchy of street typologies. Generally the Minor District Connector street serves as an individual District's organizing spine or Main Street, with Neighborhood Streets providing a walkable connective network. This Chapter includes typical layout plans, organized by District and Street Typology. Layout plans indicate design intent for street tree spacing, hardscape finishes, score joint layout, relationship of hardscape to planting areas; street trees, lighting and other appurtenances. The plans also indicate materials and layout for specific site elements including hardscape, planting and site furnishings. In addition to core framework elements captured by typical layout plans, this chapter includes descriptive guidelines of streetscape components and special conditions including site utilities, public art and wayfinding signage and street lighting. Note that materials and configurations, particularly street trees and understory planting will vary from District to District. Refer to Chapter 2 for overall Street Typology, Hardscape and Street Tree Framework diagrams for relationship of individual Districts and streets to the overall Specific Plan area organization. Additional materials information and specifications can be found in Chapter 4 Appendix. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 37 3.1.1 Uptown Center District Major District Connector A Jefferson Avenue Major District Connector C Jefferson Avenue Minor District Connector Winchester Road Overland Drive Neighborhood Street Future Proposed See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS N T.S i_411 44 46 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 39 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDSa , Major District Connector A Plan Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6" A ■ YI � f ■ ■ ■ I ■ I ■ ■ f ■ ■ - — 1 f f .. l ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 7 ■ f 4 � ■ ■ ■ ■ 3 ■ , ■ I f ALIGN f ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ED I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 5 ■ 5 iW ILo itz # J J {w ■ ■� a O � _ a 1--- R.O.W. —� KEY PLAN STREETS Jefferson Avenue N.T.S. LEGEND G) Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 2Q 4' X 10' Tree Grate @ 30' O.C. Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 Q 4"x16" Concrete Pavers © 6" Vehicular Curb 7Q Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.0 Notes: • See 132 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 132 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 126 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" - - - - -- -- -Yl 40 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 1 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector A Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish PLANTING Street Tree: Fern Pine, Podocarpus gracilior z / I Pre -cast Concrete Tree Grate: Pavers: Neenah 4"X16" Acker -Stone 4' x10' R-8815-b Warm Earth Tone Blend Street Light: Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 41 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS. Major District Connector C Plan Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6„ I ■ ■ R ■ ■ ■ 111 1 a' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ r. I ■ ■ ■ a ' ■ ■ ■ I . ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ • I T ■ ■ ■ ■V. ■ ■ i ALIGN ■ w iZ Z Iri �_J I :� • QIL w ■� a KEY PLAN N-T.S. STREETS Jefferson Avenue LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O. C. 20 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers © 6" Vehicular Curb 70 Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.C. Notes: • See 132 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 132 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 126 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 42 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector C HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Street Tree. - Fern Pine, Podocarpus gracilior Materials Pre -cast Concrete Street Light: Pavers: Vehicular and Pedestrian 4"X16" Acker -Stone LED Light w/Banner Kit Warm Earth Tone Blend Understory Planting (single species per block): t :f?�li'.�Yo .. Blue Grama Grass, Atlas Fescue, Bouteloua Blonde Festuca mairei Ambition' Accent Planting (Species mixed into understory planting): Naked Ladies, Amaryllis belladonna Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 43 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDSDISTRICT Minor District Connector Plan Layout Frontage Zone ■ ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ 2 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 5 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 3 ■ ■ ■ 4 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ w ■ ■Z ■ r H i� ■J ■j ■ ■m Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Curb 6' 4' 6" r r o KEY PLAN NT.S STREETS Winchester Road Overland Drive LEGEND Q Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. Q2 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb 5Q Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.0 ALIGN i Notes: w • See 132 for Hardscape Materials Legend Z_ • See 132 for Site Furnishings Legend J • See 126 for Plant Material Legend i • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a i w 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required a behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula O Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section aStandards for on -street parking locations. R.O.W —II SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 44 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff pedestrian LED Light Sandblast Finish PLANTING Street Tree: Brisbane Box, Lophostemon confertus Materials Understory Planting (single species per block): Variegated Dietes, White Flowering Dwarf Coast Dietes 'Variegata' Rose, Rosa 'Ice Rosemary, Westringia f. 'Morning Light' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 45 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT Neighborhood Street • lan Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6" A� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r v ■ � I • r-:ti • r ' 5 `tea ALIGN ■ i I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■w rw ■z z ■ ■Q i�T W a- ■�_ �D ■m A a --- R.O.W. —� z 0 N in KEY PLAN N.T.S. STREETS See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O. C. 20 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb 05 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.0 Notes: • See 132 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 132 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 126 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" 46 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING East / West Street Tree: Marina Madrone, Arbutus x Marina' Understory Planting (single species per .. Variegated Dietes, White Flowering Dwarf Coast Dietes 'Variogata' Rose, Rosa 'Ice Rosemary, Cap' Westringia f. 'Morning Light' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 47 3.1.2 Uptown Hotel / Tourism District Major District Connector A Jefferson Avenue Major District Connector B East Jefferson Avenue Major District Connector B Allee Jefferson Avenue Neighborhood Street Future Proposed See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 Entry Median Jefferson Avenue 3.0 DESIGN STANDARD N IS Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 49 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT Major District Connector A Pian Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6„ I . ■I/F r ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 R ■ ■ r i ■ ■ ■ ■ � ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■. I ■ ■ E. ■ ■ r I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ E ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ f ■ 5 ■ i �■ 6 ■ ■ W ■ _ I W ■ � J Iz ■ �j W ■� �m a O �I a R.O.W. 0 0 a 0 STREETS Jefferson Avenue LEGEND 1� Street Tree at 30'-0" O. C. 20 4' X 10' Tree Grate @ 30' O.C. 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 Q 4"x16" Concrete Pavers © 6" Vehicular Curb 0 Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.C. Notes: • See 134 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 134 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" 50 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Street Tree: Fern Pine, Podocarpus gracilior ON, Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4 "X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Tree Grate: Neenah 4' x10' R-8815-b Materials Street Light: Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 51 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS UPTOWN HOTEL /TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT LayoutMajor District Connector B East Plan 0 T Furnishings Pedestrian Frontage Curb Zone Zone Zone 6" 4' 6' 9'-6„ e— _ r ■ A IGN ■ i ■ i ■ 1 I ■ i i ■ ■ I ■ . ■ ■ i ■ r 'ALIGN ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i ■ LU ■ z tn. ■ J F ■ w� Dr a r■ 0 Zi o_ rn ■ R.O.W. KEY PLAN N.T.S- STREETS Jefferson Avenue (East) LEGEND 0 Street Tree at 30' - 0" O.C. 0 4' wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) Q Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 Q 6" Vehicular Curb © Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at X' - X" O.C. 0 Electrical Stub -out for Future Street Tree Accent Lighting ® 5' wide Pedestrian Pathway for On - Street Parking at 30'-0" O C Notes: • See 134 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 134 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 52 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDAR Major District Connector B East Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS •H MR Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Street Tree: California Sycamore, Platanus racemosa Understory Planting: Pre -cast Concrete Street Light: Pavers: Vehicular and Pedestrian 4"X16" Acker -Stone LED Light w/Banner Kit Warm Earth Tone Blend M i -111 11 Street Tree Support: Silva Cell Blue Grama Grass, Blue Flax Lily, Fountain Grass, Bouteloua 'Blonde Dianella revoluta Pennisetum 'Bunny Ambition' 'Little Rev' Tails' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 53 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT Major District Connector B Aliee Pian Layout :e ""`"""` • See 134 for Hardscape Materials Legend Improvements • See 134 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8"= V-0" 54 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B Allee HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Street Light: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Vehicular and Pedestrian Pedestrian LED Light Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate LED Light w/ Banner Kit Finish PLANTING rI Street and Allee Tree: Street Tree and Allee Tree Support: California Sycamore, Platanus racemosa Silva Cell Understory Planting: Blue Grams. Grass, Blue flax Lily. Bouteloua 'Blonde Dianella revoluta Ambition' 'Little Rev' Fountain Grass, Pennisetum 'Bunny Tails' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 55 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT Neighborhood - lan Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Curb Zone Zone Zone 6' 4' 6 ■ ■ ■ 5 ■ ■ I ALIGN ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ �z Iz I�■ ■d e© IW ■� l ■ ■ ■m A aa- I` 0 R.O.W. z 0 0 KEY PLAN N.T.S STREETS See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 LEGEND 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 2Q 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb 05 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 134 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 134 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" 56 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING North / South Street Tree: East / West Street Tree: Natchez Crape Myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica Marina Madrone, Arbutus x 'Marina' 'Natchez' Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street): Creeping Stoke's Dward Dwarf Myrtle, Dwarf Yedda Comprosma, Yaupon Holly, flex Myrtus communis Hawthorn, Comprosma petdei vomitoria 'Stoke's 'Compacts' Rhaphiolepis 'Verde Vista' Dwarf' umbellate 'Minor' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 57 DESIGN STANDARDS UPTOWN HOTEL/TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT Entry Median PLan Layout Curb Maintenance Planting Maintenance Path Zone Path Curb 6" 16" 12-16' 16" 6° 0 0 N KEY PLAN N T.S STREETS Jefferson Avenue LEGEND 10 Median Tree at 20'-0" O.C. 2Q 4"x16" Concrete Pavers 0 6" Vehicular Curb ® 12'-16' Wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting Q Median Tree Accent Uplighting Notes: • See 135 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 135 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 127 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 58 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN HOTEL / TOURISM CENTER DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Entry Median HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS ;r Pre -cast Concrete Accent Uplighting: Pavers: LED Uplight 2 per Tree 4"XI6" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend PLANTING Median Tree: Oklahoma Western Redbud, Cercis canadensis 'Oklahoma' Understory Planting: Naked Ladies, Amaryllis belladonna Lilac Blooming Salvia, Salvia x 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Blue Game Grass, Boutelou Blonde Ambition' Materials Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Rose, Cistus Coprosma petriei 'Sunset' 'Verde Vista' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.1.3 Uptown Sports / Transit District Major District Connector B East Jefferson Avenue Major District Connector B Allee Jefferson Avenue Minor District Connector 66 Madison Avenue Neighborhood Street 68 Future Proposed See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 Entry Median Jefferson Avenue Minor District Connector Median Madison Avenue N T.S. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 61 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS'OR Major District Connector B East Plan Layout 0 Furnishings Pedestrian Frontage Curb Zone Zone Zone 6° 4' 6' 9, 6 K r �--- KEY PLAN N T.S. STREETS Jefferson Avenue (East) • I i ■ LEGEND i r Q Street Tree at 30'-0" O. C. ALIGN ■ a 0 4' wide Continuous Planting Area with ■ Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ Integral Color Concrete Type 2 l■ t'J 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ■ © Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- i 0" O.C. i Il ■ ■ 7D Electrical Stub -out for Future Street ■ � Tree Accent Lighting w 1 a ■ C a ® 5' wide Pedestrian Pathway for On- J a Street Parking at 30'-0" O C. i W r Notes: r • See 135 for Hardscape Materials Legend 1GN a m • See 135 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend R.O.W. SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" 62 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT A 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B East Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish PLANTING Street Tree: California Sycamore, Platanus racemosa Pre -cast Concrete Street Light: Pavers: Vehicular and Pedestrian 4 "X16 " Acker -Stone LED Light wl Banner Kit Warm Earth Tone Blend Street Tree Support: Silva Cell Understory Planting: Blue Grama Grass, Blue Flax Lily, Fountain Grass, Bouteloua 'Blonde Dianella revoluta Pennisetum 'Bunny Ambition' 'Little Rev' T49BSI Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 63 1ANDARDS UPTOWN SPORTS Major District Connector B Allee Plan Layout !`r-1-6. Deiiec4ri�n Furniehinne Ts- L' LEGEND ' z 0 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 9 ALIGN 11 0 20 Allee Tree at 30'-0" O.C. Q3 4' wide Continuous Planting Area with 5 - Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 4 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 3 5 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 N© 6" Vehicular Curb m _ ' 7Q Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.C. ® Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. o_ 4'-0" to 6'-0" Boulders o_ `� 10 Electrical Stub -out for Future Street Tree and Allee Tree Accent Lighting m of 11 5' wide Pedestrian Pathway for On - Street Parking at 30'-0" O.C. Murrieta Streetscape Notes: Creekside improvements • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend Improvements • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" 64 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Major District Connector B Allee HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS A. ,. :ICI r _�,,.{{'�tA• ' ��il,F1••'1� • •r Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Street Light: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff Vehicular and Pedestrian Pedestrian LED Light Exposed Aggregate LED Light w/ Banner Kit Finish Street and Allee Tree: Street Tree and Allee Tree Support: California Sycamore, Platanus racemosa Silva Cell Understory Planting: �- ,kv_, L� -Y • ry Blue Gama Grass, Blue Flax Lily, Bouteloua 'Blonde Dianella revoluta Ambition' 'Little Rev' L � l Pennisetum 'Bunny Tales' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 65 ASPORTS Minor District Connector Plan Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 916" 6' 4' 6° H i :o a ■� O �m a H—R.O.W. —► KEY PLAN STREETS Madison Avenue LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. N.T.S. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 30 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb Q Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend • See xx for Furnishings Zone Example Treatments SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" 66 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARD Minor District Connector Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS -AL Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandhlast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING Street Tree: Brisbane Box, Lophostemon confertus Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street): �i t Variegated Dietes, Fountain Dietes 'Variegate' Grass, Pennisetum 'Bunny Tales' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 67 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT Neighborhood Street Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6" II--- R. O. W. --� Plan Layout KEY PLAN N.TS. STREETS See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb Q5 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. Notes: • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations SCALE 1 /8" = 1 •-0" 68 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING North / South Street Tree: East / West Street Tree: Natchez Crape Myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica Marina Madrone, Arbutus x 'Marina' 'Natchez' Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street): Variegated Dietes, Fountain Grass, Dietes 'Variegata' Pennisetum 'Bunny Tales' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 69 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT Entry Median Pian Layout Curb Maintenance Planting Maintenance Path Zone Path Curb 6" 16" 12-16' 16" 6" KEY PLAN N.T.S. o STREETS oJefferson Avenue (V LEGEND 10 Median Tree at 20'-0" O.C. 02 4"x16" Concrete Pavers Q 6" Vehicular Curb ® 12'-16' Wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting Q Median Tree Accent Uplights Notes: • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" _ a 70 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Entry Median HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend PLANTING Accent Uplighting: LED Uplights 2 per tree Understory Planting: Naked Ladies, Amaryllis belladonna Lilac Blooming Salvia, Salvia x Median Tree: 'Heatwave Glitter Oklahoma Western Redbud, Cercis canadensis Sage' 'Oklahoma' Blue Game Grass, Boutelou 'Blonde Ambition' Materials Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Rose, Cistus Coprosma petriei 'Sunset' 'Verde Vista' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 71 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS-- UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT' Minor District Connector Median Plan Layout Maintenance Planting Maintenance Curb Path Zone Path Curb 6" 16" 12-16' 16" 6" 0 0 0 N KEY PLAN N.T.S. STREETS Jefferson Avenue LEGEND 0 Median Tree at 20'-0" O.C. 20 4"x16" Concrete Pavers Q 6" Vehicular Curb ® 12'-16' Wide Continuous Planting Area with Understory Planting Q Median Tree Accent Uplights Notes: • See 136 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 136 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 128 for Plant Material Legend SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" 72 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN SPORTS / TRANSIT DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Median HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS w f� Pre -cast Concrete Accent Uplighting Pavers: LED Uplights 2 per Tree 4 "X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend PLANTING Median Tree: Oklahoma Western Redbud, Cercis canadensis 'Oklahoma' Understory Planting: Creeping Rock Creeping Coprosma, Rose, Cistus x Coprosma petriei hybridus 'Verde Vista' A.,b _ White Flowering Dwarf Coast Rose, Rosa 'Ice Rosemary, Cap' Westringia L 'Morning Light' Variegated Dietes, Dietes 'Variegate' Materials Fountain Grass, Pennisetum 'Bunny Tails' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 73 3.1.4 Uptown Arts District Minor District Connector Del Rio Rd Extension Enterprise Circle Commerce Center Drive Neighborhood Street 78 Future Proposed See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS N T.S. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Plan Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6" I I I - I O i I O KEY PLAN N.T.S STREETS Del Rio Road Extension Enterprise Circle (West + North) Commerce Center Drive ` I LEGEND 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O. C. 20 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 -�- I ® 6" Vehicular Curb O Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O C. I I a ALIGN � I i w Notes: z • See 137 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 137 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 129 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a "step 12 inch -out' concrete strip is required d p behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula a Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" R.O.W. 76 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN ARTS DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN DARD Minor District Connector Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING Street Tree: African Sumac, Rhus lances Understory Planting (Select one plant pairing below, use on both sides of street per block; arrange in natural groupings): Plant Pairing 1 Plant Pairing 2 Salvia leucantha Autumn Moor Atlas Fescue, Verbena lilacina 'De 'Santa Barbara' Grass, Sesleria Festuca mairei La Mina' autumnalis . F��'7 I--, Atlas Fescue, Blackfoot Daisy, California Wild Autumn Moor Festuca mairei Melampodium Rose, Rosa Grass, Sesleria leucanthum californica autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 77 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDSUPTOWN Neighborhood Street Plan Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Curb Zone Zone Zone 9 6„ " 6' 4' 6 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ r I ■ ■ ■ ■ 3 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I tC ■ ■ ■ I ALIGN ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r � ■ s ■ r j ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ uj I W ■Z Z I� R ■0 i Iw ■� a 0 ■� ■ W I ■m a 1--- R.O.W. KEY PLAN N Is STREETS See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 g LEGEND Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 20 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ® 6" Vehicular Curb Q5 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. io N Notes: • See 138 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 138 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 129 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 78 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards UPTOWN ARTS DISTRICT 1 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Pedestrian Light: Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit PLANTING North / South Street Tree: East / West Street Tree: Natchez Crape Myrtle, Lagerstroemia indica Marina Madrone, Arbutus x 'Marina' 'Natchez' Understory Planting (Select one plant pairing below, use on both sides of street per block; arrange in natural groupings): Plant Pairing 1 Plant Pairing 2 Plant Pairing 3 :r_ Salvia Autumn Moor Atlas Fescue, Verbena Atlas Fescue, Blacldoot leucantha Grass, Sesleria Festuca mairei I lacing 'De La Festuca mairei Daisy, 'Santa autumnalis Mina' Melampodium Barbara' leucanthum Plant Pairing 4 California Wild Autumn Moor Rose, Rosa Grass, Sesleria californica autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 79 3.1.5 Creekside Village District Major District Connector C Jefferson Avenue 82 Minor District Connector 84 Del Rio Rd Commerce Center Drive Extension Neighborhood Street Future Proposed See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS N IS Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS - Major District Connector C Plan Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Zone Curb 9'-6" 6' 4' 6„ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1 � 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ E o ■ ■ ■ f ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I w ■Q ■� w ■� a ua :00 � KEY PLAN N T.S. STREETS Jefferson Avenue LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 30 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ~f~ ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers © 6" Vehicular Curb ALIGN 0 Vehicular and Pedestrian Light at 120'- 0" O.C. R.O.W. Notes: • See 139 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 139 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 130 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8" = 1'-0" 82 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards KREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARD Major District Connector C HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS tw r1 Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Street Tree: Fern Pine, Podocarpus gracilior Materials Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Street Light: Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light w/ Banner Kit Understory Planting (single species per block): 'f Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Atlas Fescue, Amaryllis Bouteloua 'Blonde Festuca mairei belladonna Ambition' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 83 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT Minor District Connector Plan Layout Frontage Zone 9'-6" Pedestrian Furnishings Zone Zone Curb 6' 4' 6" KEY PLAN NTS. I � I � O I STREETS r Del Rio Road I Commerce Center Drive Extension I LEGEND I j (D Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 0 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting -� Beyond Furnishing Zone) 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 -�- ® 6" Vehicular Curb I O Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O.C. I ALIGN I Notes: w Z • See 139 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 139 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 130 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a CL 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required p behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula W IL Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. R.O.W. SCALE 1/8"= 1'-0" 84 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Minor District Connector Materialls HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING Street Tree: African Sumac, Rhus lances Understory Planting (single species per block{): Blue Game Grass, Fountain Grass, Autumn Moor Bouteloua `Blonde Pennisetum `Bunny Grass, Sesleria Ambition' Tails' autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 85 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT Neighborhood Layout Frontage Pedestrian Furnishings Curb Zone Zone Zone 6 4 6., I ■ i ■ � 4 i ■ ■ !c1 ■ I ( ■ ■ ■ I ALIGN ■ ■ ■ � I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Iw :z z I� .o i0 IW ■a a. 0 ■� i CO00 I ■ An- R.O.W. z 0 0 KEY PLAN NITS STREETS See Street Typologies Diagram page 22 LEGEND 10 Street Tree at 30'4" O.C. 20 4'x10' Planting Area with Understory Planting (Do Not Extend Planting Beyond Furnishing Zone) 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 6" Vehicular Curb 05 Pedestrian Light at 60'-0" O C. Notes: • See 139 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 139 for Site Furnishings Legend • See 130 for Plant Material Legend • Where On -Street parking is allowed, a 12 inch "step -out" concrete strip is required behind the curb. Refer to Uptown Temecula Streetscape Plan Street Cross Section Standards for on -street parking locations. SCALE 1/8"= 1'-13" 86 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 1CREEKSIDE VILLAGE DISTRICT 1 DESIGN STANDARDS Neighborhood Street Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Pedestrian Light: Davis Color Mesa Buff Pedestrian LED Light w/ Sandblast Finish Banner Kit PLANTING Street Tree: Marina Madrone, Arbutus x 'Marina' Understory Planting (single species per block): , Blue Game Grass, Fountain Grass, Autumn Moor Bouteloua 'Blonde Pennisetum 'Bunny Grass, Sesleria Ambition' Tails' autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 87 0 6 - 1 I / I, .I 3.1.6 Gateways: Enhanced Intersections and Bulb -Outs, all Districts nhanced intersections are required at all intersecting streets and some of these locations are associated with bulb -outs. Reference the Uptown Specific Plan Street Cross Sections for intersection and bulb -out locations and the City of Temecula Standard Drawing Numbers 402, 603A and 000 for curb, ramp and bulb -out configurations which can also be found in the Section 4.0 of this document. 0 All RE <............ Enhanced Intersection and Gateway Diagram Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 89 1 DESIGN STANDARDS Primary Gateway Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Winchester Rd Jefferson Avenue + Overland Drive w U ¢p Z Z c Q 6 <<r QV) w -ia U J J M W Q ar 0 0 I U 0 0 I 0 n MINOR DISTRICT CONNECTOR 1 is .o 'M �rr�r.rrlrr. r.rawirrrrrr rr. ■. rr ��� ■ ■ LEGEND l Q Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 5 � ■ Q Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ ® 4"x16" Concrete Pavers ■ i O 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ ■ Type 1 ■ ■ © 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ■ ■ Q Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula ■ ■ Standard No. 402 ■ R•O-W. --4: ® Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" ■ wide White Border ■ i 09 B C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) ■ i 10 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) w z ■w ■ ■ ? Notes: � ■ i • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend w ■ ■0 J 0 x ■ ■ m SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 90 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards c ''31 DESIGN STANDARDS Primary Gateway Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish �i �Zl 'z Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Stamped Asphalt Crosswalk: "Tile" Pattern Paving Products, Cable Stamp Color. Natural Cement Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 91 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS GATEWAYS Primary Gateway INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Cherry Street Jefferson Avenue + Rancho California as Ir I U o O b � U w M z z O I Q U _ cn ; O 73 Q2 5 R.0-W. Plan Layout ;TING STREET PER CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARD �rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr� TT ■ ■ LEGEND t ■ ■ 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. ■ ■ 20 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ ■ Q Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ ■ ® 4"x16" Concrete Pavers ■ ■ ■ Q 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ ■ Type 1 ■ ■ © 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ■ 7Q Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula ■ Standard No. 402 ■ �■ ■ ® Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" ■ wide White Border ■ i 09 B C.R (Beginning of Curb Radius) 10 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) ■W ■ ■ J Notes: ■ • See 137 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 137 for Site Furnishings Legend ■0 - J f m ■ SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 92 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards GATEWAYS 3.0 DESIGN DA.D Primary Gateway Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS llx`' Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Pavers: Crosswalk: Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Finish Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color. Natural Cement Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 93 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway A Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS South Corner of Jefferson Avenue + Via Montezuma �— a NEIGHBORHOOD STREEt South Corner of Jefferson - 10'-0' Avenue + Del Rio Road { Io 6 0 Ld0 1 { wQ Uo 0 ZZ �� � �rrrrrrrr rrwrrrrrarrw...... 2 ■ wQ OQo< 1 ■ UJi �OQc' ■ LU M U W ¢ LEGEND Q~ w�uiz a i 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O. C. ,1 _ _ ■ �O ■ z0 Q B 0 Planting Area with Understory Planting N U O > o I ■ ■ 0 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 / i�u7 4 ■ ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers .+ ■ © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ezail Type 1 - i ■ + (2) 6" Vehicular Curb LR.O.W. ■ ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula Standard No. 402 U Q' ■ O I ■ Q Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" w �j ■ wide White Border z _0 O PO 41 ■ B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) a � w ■ F- ■ 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) r I J ■ ■ Notes- • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend 0 UJ 0. • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend l a- ■ • See 126 for Plant Material Legend O Q + + I, D ■ m i M SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 94 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards ,GATEWAYS 3.0 DESIGN STANDARD$ Secondary Gateway A Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Pavers: Crosswalk: Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate 4"XI6" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Finish Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement PLANTING Understory Planting (Combination of 3 species): r r Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Creeping Rock Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' Creeping Coprosma, Lilac Blooming Coprosma petriei Salvia, Salvia x 'Verde Vista' 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 95 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDSGATEWAYS Secondary Gateway A Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Sanborn Avenue ry Ld ry wQ U p Q Q O Q (n Ua w� z� a it �-o zr o� V)v NEIGHBORHOOD STREE* 10'— 0' o ROL qk- o-jQO !��� _ ��•.b ■ ■ ■ _ _ w� Sao I• r` _ ■ ■ LEGEND �w�--zx ■ Street Tree at 30'-0" 0.0 O 6 ■ 20 Planting Area with Understory Planting o I ■ ■ 30 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 o � ■ 4 ■ ■ ®Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers r 1 I r■i © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete a Type 1 ■ + 7D 6" Vehicular Curb L r ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula R.O.W. Standard No. 402 o I ■ 0 Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" ■ wide White Border ■ O ■ ■ 10 B.C.R (Beginning of Curb Radius) W Z J L Z ■ .■ ■ 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) I J ■ I- ■ Notes: _� • See 137 for Hardscape Materials Legend w a ■ • See 137 for Site Furnishings Legend 0 • See 129 for Plant Material Legend + [o ■ + i SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 96 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards GATEWAYS 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway A Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS 4 Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Pavers: Crosswalk: Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Finish Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement PLANTING Understory Planting (Combination of 3 species): tit Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Creeping Rock Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' Creeping Coprosma, Lilac Blooming Coprosma petriei Salvia, Salvia x 'Verde Vista' 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 97 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway A Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS North Corner of Jefferson Avenue + Via Montezuma North Corner of Jefferson Avenue +Del Rio Road r K rLi 0~. �1 wQ - Uo 0 Zz aQ QU)Ld w - O Q 0 J Q U J r Z Q �_ U 0 JU U w Z �w �a0 Z� Ljw�Z w cn Q w Elf o Z O— c U W O F- L) w Z Z O U U U U) 0 Of O Q + CjI 0 0 0 i, li 11 NEIGHBORHOOD STREE 10'-0' MA, I 8 1 6 0 o ; — ; LEGEND _ - l Q Street Tree at 30'-0" O C. O ■ 6 ■ ■ 20 Planting Area with Understory Planting 1 ■ ■ Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ® ■ ■ ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers ■ © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete I Type 1 Q7 6" Vehicular Curb R.O.W. ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula Standard No. 402 ■ ■ 0 Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" ■ wide White Border ■ ■ ■ 10 B.C.R (Beginning of Curb Radius) -w— Z - ■ Z—■ Z ■ 11 E.C.R- (End of Curb Radius) JI J■ ■ Notes: -i • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend ,U ; • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend 5 ■ • See 127 for Plant Material Legend m ■ i SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 98 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Secondary Gateway A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS ii Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish PLANTING Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Pavers: Crosswalk: 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement Understory Planting (Combination of 3 species): Naked Ladies, Blue Game Grass, Creeping Rock Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' Creeping Coprosma, Lilac Blooming Coprosma petriei Salvia, Salvia x 'Verde Vista' 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 99 Secondary Gateway B INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Buecking Drive Plan Layout EIGHBORHOOD STREE Y-0' lmmmmm:mm am 30'-0" O.0 with Understory Planting Concrete Type 1 Concrete Type 2 to Pavers - Integral Color Concrete arb mp per City of Temecula )00 salt Cross Walk with 8" rder ling of Curb Radius) Curb Radius) scape Materials Legend Furnishings Legend t Material Legend 100 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards STANDARDSGATEWAYS 3.0 DESIGN Secondary Gateway B Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Pavers: Crosswalk: Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate 4"X16" Acker -Stone "Tile" Pattern Paving Finish Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement PLANTING Understory Planting (Combination of 3 to 5 species): «� V ON X. Naked Ladies, Blue Gama Grass, Creeping Rock Amaryllis Boutelou 'Blonde Rose, Cistus belladonna Ambition' 'Sunset' Creeping Coprosma, Lilac Blooming Coprosma petriei Salvia, Salvia x 'Verde 1fista' 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 101 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Secondary Gateway B Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS Winchester Road + Commerce Center Overland Drive + Commerce Center Via Montezuma + Commerce Center ------------ LdQ C)in Z_a - _ :�, O H Q U)Ld L� 0 Q 0 J Q 0 0-1i >-�QQ U C) W U J W Z ZF [if W H . WH-U) a 0 a - it 1o Z� o� N U o: O U w Z Z O U U t7 o: O Z 2 MINOR DISTRICT CONNECTO� � 10'-0� I j�j �rrrrrrrr'rrrrrarr.rrrrrrrtAr ■ � I ■ ■ I LEGEND Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 6 20 Planting Area with Understory Planting 0 ■ ■ 03 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 o � ■ ® ■ ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 r ■ Q 4"x16" Concrete Pavers ■ 1 ■ © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ Type 1 ■ ■ 7� 6" Vehicular Curb ■ r ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula 6 LR,OAfV. Standard No. 000 I ■ o ■ o ■ Q Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" ■ wide White Border r o ■ M ■ ■ 10 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) Cry W u1 ■ Z Z ■ 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) ■ Notes- I N • See 138 for Hardscape Materials Legend W 0 • See 138 for Site Furnishings Legend ■ • See 130 for Plant Material Legend 00 ■ ■ ■ SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 102 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Secondary Gateway B HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish PLANTING Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"XI6" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Stamped Asphalt Crosswalk: "Tile" Pattern Paving Products, Cable Stamp Color: Natural Cement Understory Planting (Combination of 3 to 5 species): Atlas Fescue, Iris douglasiana Rosmarinus o. Salvia leucantha Santolina Festuca mairei 'Huntington Carpet' 'Santa Barbara' chamaecyparissus 'Nana' Materials I' r� Autumn Moor Grass, Sesleria autumnalis Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 103 Tertiary Gateway A Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS Winchester Road + Diaz Road Overland Drive + Diaz Road 1O'M 0 o O U 0 w Z Z O U H U H Ln o of I O Z EXISTING STREET PER CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARD a r r LEGEND r D Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. 5 i 20 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ I ! Q Not Used 1 ■ ® 4"x16" Concrete Pavers r r r O 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete r Type 1 r r r © 6" Vehicular Curb I r r I 7Q Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula r Standard No. 402 ROW Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" r wide White Border r i 0 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) � r 10 E.C.R (End of Curb Radius) Z z 'w ■ 29 Notes: r • See 138 for Hardscape Materials Legend i a • See 138 for Site Furnishings Legend W r� ICL !� f° .m SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 104 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards STANDARDS .GATEWAYS 3.0 DESIGN Tertiary Gateway A Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS r Concrete Type 1: Pre -cast Concrete Stamped Asphalt Davis Color Mesa Buff Pavers: Crosswalk: Sandblast Finish 4 "X16" Acker -Stone " 7ue" Pattern Paving Warm Earth Tone Products, Cable Stamp Blend Color: Natural Cement Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 105 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS GATEWAY& Tertiary Gateway B Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS I! I Jefferson Avenue + Las I Q Hacienda Street Jefferson Avenue + Calle Cortez O w a - Elf wa U 0 0 QQ I Q U w JQ 0<�<) O J D r Q w � U JU ULL1Z O Q O zw SwF Z Q ~ Ld LL a- — �O z� ovin I y 0 0 I 0 NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 10'-0' ai �slllllilllli iiiillliii W�-E ■ ■ ■ i LEGEND ■ O Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. ■ 0 6 Not Used ■ ■ �3 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ ® ® Integral Color Concrete Type 2 J ■ 0 4"x16" Concrete Pavers ■ ■ I © 4" Flush Curb - Integral Color Concrete ■ Type 1 ■ 70 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula LR.O.W. Standard No. 402 ■ ■ I ■ QQ Stamped Asphalt Cross Walk with 8" ■ wide White Border ■ ■ ■ 10 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) ■ W Ly ■ Z Z 11 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) Notes: w O ■ . See 140 for Hardscape Materials Legend • See 140 for Site Furnishings Legend 5 ■ 00 ■ _ J ■ SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 106 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Tertiary Gateway B HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS x f Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish L� Pre -cast Concrete Pavers: 4"X16" Acker -Stone Warm Earth Tone Blend Stamped Asphalt Crosswalk: "Tile" Pattern Paving Products, Cable Stamp Color: Natural Cement Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 107 Non Gateway A Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue +Various i © i MAJOR DISTRICT A CONNECTOR Neighborhood Streets 10'-0' I S % -------------- I i I ; Ld 7 I �r w� U p O Z Z <H a V) r w OQ0 ■ Ua D }�Q0 0 I JU O W 0L, z �¢O I ■ ■ Q~ w�u Z r o a ■ LEGEND ■ o w Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. V) U O I ■ > o I 20 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ r 30 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ ■ ® 6" Vehicular Curb 1 ■ I O Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula ■ Standard No. 402 r + i © City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk i ■ ■ Q B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) o C i R.O.W. �■ ®E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) ■ o r7 ■ ■ Lu r ■ W Lu ■ i W ■ W ■ v~i z i z J J p 0 Notes: = i— ■ • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend o_ Oro +- + _ O • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend Z I ! SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 108 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway A Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Caior Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 109 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS _ GATEWAYS Non Gateway A Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS J© i MAJOR DISTRICT B CONNECTOR Jefferson Avenue + Various Neighborhood Streets i 8 10'-0' r' w p aelf T W Q Up 0 zz Qa Df r— QV wQ 0<0 0 UJ rDQ LLJ U W p J zLLJ Q W Lu w N z of d - �o z� o= U 0 > I 0 C3l 0 0 0 I r� H uJ uJ LO — z O - J O m + z w I i O i Q Q ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i LEGEND ■ # 0 Street Tree at 30'-0" 0. C. i ■ ■ I � ■ 20 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ ■ ■ Q3 Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ ■ ■ ® 6" Vehicular Curb ■ I O Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula I . Standard No. 402 ■ i © City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk ■ ■ ■ 70 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) 1H--R.O. W. —1■ ■ ® E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) ■ ■ ■ ■ - i ■ i ■ LU ■ I z i J ■ 0 ■ Notes: i • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend a ; • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend ■ SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 110 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards T Non Gateway A HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Exposed Aggregate Finish Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Non Gateway A INTERSECTIONS Jefferson Avenue + Various i Neighborhood Streets _J Of Q— w 7 a-o wQ U p 0 QQ I Of a U) bi -iQ oQ0c UJ Qc� � �Upc JU ULJz z W W w U Q a �d z} OV V) C5 0 0 0 1 ro N IN Plan Layout MAJOR DISTRICT C CONNECTOR v� WW mom ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i LEGEND ■ 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. I ■ _ ■ to ■ 20 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 r ■ ■ Q Integral Color Concrete Type 2 ■ r r ® 6" Vehicular Curb I ■ O Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula i Standard No 402 ■ r■r © City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk r r ■ 0 B.C.R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) ■ R.O.W.-�■ 8 E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) r r ■ r r r I ; w■ z_ Z ■ J J ■ 0 a Notes: i r • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend 0 E • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend I m ■ y ■ I SCALE 1/10" = 1'-0" 112 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards GATEWAYS 3.0 DESIGN DA■D Non Gateway A Materials HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Concrete Type 2: Davis Color Mesa Buff Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Exposed Aggregate Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 113 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway B Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS Various Neighborhood + Intersecting Neighborhood Streets Of w 6 �� wQ U p 0 Z Z I QQ a cn U- UJ UQOfo D Q O JU �wp ZLd W w N O Q �o z} O� U O 0 0 I PO 0 NEIGHBORHOOD STREET-+ 10'— 0' , I i 0 �www.wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww riaw ■ ■ r r ■ ■ ■ i LEGEND r 10 Street Tree at 30'-0" O.C. I ■ ■ I Q ■ 20 Integral Color Concrete Type 1 ■ 03 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula ■ Standard No. 402 i ■ 1 I 05 City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk ■ i © B.C. R. (Beginning of Curb Radius) ■ i 7D E.C.R. (End of Curb Radius) ■ ■ 1*—R.O.W. r r ■ r ■ ■ w■ Z I Z ■ ■ J J 0 Notes- 1T ■ • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend O • See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend = r I � r ! SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 114 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Non Gateway B HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Concrete Type 1: Davis Color Mesa Buff Sandblast Finish Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 115 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS Non Gateway B Plan Layout INTERSECTIONS i Various District Connector I Streets + Intersecting Neighborhood Streets 1 J _ 1 C3 0 0 I 0 O I MINOR DISTRICT CONNECTOR4 I 10' - 0' I o� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ i LEGEND ■ Q Street Tree at 30'-0" O. C. -� 2Q Integral Color Concrete Type 1 I � ■ 03 6" Vehicular Curb ■ ■ ® Pedestrian Ramp per City of Temecula ■ Standard No 402 ■ -r 50 City of Temecula Standard Crosswalk i © B.C.R- (Beginning of Curb Radius) ■ i Q E.C.R (End of Curb Radius) ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ z I z ■ J J ■ Notes: ■ • See 133 for Hardscape Materials Legend See 133 for Site Furnishings Legend [ ■ m ■ SCALE 1/10"= 1'-0" 116 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Non Gateway B HARDSCAPE + SITE FURNISHINGS Materials Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 117 .0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.2 Site Materials 3.2.1 Street Lights leek LEGEND .... .....> T N 14UU bL ALE Street Light Diagram 11e Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 3.0 DESIGN STANDARDS New pedestrian lighting should provide an engaging and attractive level of light per City of Temecula standards to enhance the pedestrian streetscape areas. Lighting shall be full cut-off dark sky compliant and energy efficient with LED lamps. Convenience power shall be provided through accessory outlets in each light pole to accommodate seasonal tree lighting or special event street lighting. Additional accent lighting such as tree uplighting will be utilized at medians, and stub -outs for future potential tree accent lighting at the allees shall be provided to enhance the character and gateway visibility once trees have established. A single street light fixture family that includes pedestrian and vehicular -scaled fixtures shall be utilized for the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. This fixture shall be compatible with existing City standard fixtures and shall offer a full range of accessories including pole -mounted banner arms, convenience outlets, and Wi-fi. Pedestrian lights shall face inward towards sidewalks, while banner arms extend toward the street. Types of Fixtures Major District Connector Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light with Banner Fixture Design Character i Sidewalk Street Minor District Connector, Neighborhood Street and ,A.flee (creek side) Pedestrian LED Light with Banner .Q - Fixture Character Image Fixture Dome Style: Round Edge Raised Medians Tree Accent Uplighting Pole Be" Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 119 .0 DESIGN STANDARDS 3.2.2 Tree Grates District standard tree grates and tree wells are sized to achieve the minimum root zone. Tree grates shall be minimum 4' x 10' of solid cast iron, ADA compliant with full frame mount and adjustable opening to accommodate tree growth over time 3.2.3 Street Trees and Understory Planting New trees to be installed shall have a minimum box size of 36". Healthy soil conditions shall be created through excavation and soil remediation and amendments. Each tree shall have a minimum root zone of 40 square feet and 36" depth per tree. Reference the City of Temecula Landscape Manual for additional requirements and specifications. Where the minimum root zone cannot be achieved (such as where trees are located adjacent to existing utilities or in hardscape plazas in tree grates that are less than 40 square feet or within the Major District Connector A) the soil containment systems, Silva Cell, shall be used. Provide a minimum of 100 square feet at 36" depth of modular suspended pavement system (Silva Cell) for each tree. Modular suspended pavement systems support tree growth by maintaining an uncompacted tree root zone through the use of cellular, in -ground pedestal systems that support paving above while also allowing water infiltration for the development of healthy root mass. These systems also support on - site storm water management and treatment through absorption, evapotranspiration and interception. Reference the City of Temecula Landscape Manual for additional requirements and specifications. Understory and accent planting shall include low growing, drought tolerant species to reduce maintenance and allow views through the streetscape. Healthy soil conditions shall be created through excavation and soil remediation and amendments. No plants categorized as invasive by Cal-IPC shall be planted. 7Yee Crete Character Image Silva Cell Enlarged Section Montle Lion 120 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 11, 3.0 DESIGN STANDARD 3.3 Other Site Elements 3.3.1 Site Furnishings Site furnishings such as bike racks, cafe seating, benches, newspaper racks, trash and recycling receptacles are to be located within the Frontage Zone, between the property line and " Build -to" line. To encourage an eclectic, vibrant streetscape, these furnishings reflect the individual character of the private development or ground floor commercial uses. 3.3.2 Utilities and Equipment in the ROW Utilities are required to be located outside the sidewalk zones to the greatest extent possible. Items such as street lights, street trees, parking meters should be placed within the Utility Furnishing Zone, clear of the pedestrian through -way. When above -ground utilities must be placed in the public Right of Way, locate in the Utility Furnishing Zone adjacent to street and clear of the pedestrian through -way. Public art or murals on utilities shall conform with the City of Temecula art policy. 3.3.3 Bus Shelters Bus Shelters should be placed within the Utility Furnishings Zone. Bus shelter design shall be unique to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, supporting its clean, urban character. Shelter shall provide shade and seating as well as room for signage and be constructed of high quality, easily maintained and durable materials which may incorporate accent features such as accent lighting, wood slats or custom perforated steel panels. 3.3.4 Art Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 121 Public art is encouraged to reinforce the image of the District as well as define and represent the individual neighborhoods. Public art on public or private property shall reinforce the riparian and/or urban character of the Uptown District and enrich the public sphere with a high quality of design, installation and material. Art shall be durable, long lasting and maintainable. The following are potential locations and ideas. • Iconic artwork that is of sufficient scale to serve as a defining landmark at gateways and major intersections. • Wayfinding artwork such as decorative paving/ crosswalks, wall -mounted art, light sculpture and similar. • Neighborhood -Identity and Streetscape artwork such as benches, mosaics, decorative screens and fences that enrich and enliven the pedestrian experience Note that permanent art in the public right-of-way should conform to other guidelines for public sidewalks including installation in a location that does not obstruct pedestrian flow. Sidewalk inlay art pieces such as decorative paving, plaques or mosaics should meet all ADA requirements and all other federal, state and local codes and regulations regarding accessibility, including minimum friction coefficient requirements. Art in the Uptown District streetscape must comply with the City of Temecula Public Art Policy. 3.3.5 Signage District and Neighborhood Signage Historic or interpretive signage may be incorporated into the streetscape pavement or on standalone signs to highlight significant sites, features, events and locations. These locations are not identified on the plans but should be reviewed by The City of Temecula to determine appropriate locations and messages. Wayfinding Signage Historic or interpretive signage may be incorporated into the streetscape pavement or on standalone signs to highlight significant sites, features, events and locations. These locations are not identified on the plans but should be reviewed by Temecula XX to determine appropriate locations and messages. 122 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards This page intentionally left blank. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 123 APPENDIX Appendix 4.1 Materials Schedules 126 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District 126 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District 132 4.1.3 Site Furnishing Product Cut Sheets 141 4.2 Strategies for Low Impact Development 146 4.2.1 Recommended Low Impact Development Plant List 148 .0 APPENDIX 4.0 Material Schedules 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District The Following matrices outline the specific plant species, installation container size, and any design parameters associated with the planting design by district. Refer to Section 2.0 for the Street Typology and Section 3.0 for layout plans. Uptown Center District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Major District Connector A Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree grate) Podoca►pus gracilior Fern Pine 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L-M Evergreen Understory (N/A) Major District Connector C Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L-M Evergreen Understory Planting (single species per block with seasonal bulbs) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' Bulb L Deep pink bloom in late summer; 5 SF of plant in natural groupings within grasses grasses Bouteloua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Golden flag -like summer flowers Groundcover Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon 3' x 3' Grass/ L Evergreen Groundcover Minor District Connector Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Rhus lances African Sumac 36" box 30' x 30' Standard L Understory Planting (See Uptown Center District Neighborhood Street Understory Plant List below) Neighborhood Street East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x 'Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M jjj Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street) Dietes 'Variegata' Variegated Dietes 5 gallon 3' x 3' Flowering L Perennial Rosa 'Icecap' White Flowering Rose 5 gallon 2' x 5' Flowering L-M Shrub Westringia fruticosa Dwarf Coast Rosemary 5 gallon 4' x 4' Variegated L 'Morning Light' Shrub Secondary Gateway A Understory Planting (combination of 3 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' Bulb L 5SFof grasses Bouteloua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grams Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Cistus 'Sunset' Creeping Rock Rose Coprosma petriei 'Verde Vista' Salvia x 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Creeping Coprosma Lilac Blooming Salvia Groundcover 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L Groundcover 5 gallon Tx 4' Variegated L Shrub 5 gallon 3' x 3' Flowing L Shrub Evergreen; select male Evergreen, minor flowing and fruit Grass -like with creamy flowers in spring -summer Creamy -white flowers in spring - summer Cream -margined gray -green variated foliage Deep pink bloom in late summer; plant in natural groupings within grasses Golden flag -like summer flowers Magenta flowers spring -summer Cream -margined gray -green variated foliage Lilac blooms spring -fall Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Hotel / Tourism District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Major District Connector A Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree grate) Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L-M Understory (N/A) Major District Connector B East and Allee Street and Allee Tree (in 4' wide continuous planting area with understory planting) P/atanus racemosa California Sycamore 48" box 80' x 50' Standard L-M Understory Planting (a combination of grasses in natural groupings with flowering seasonal accents) Boute/oua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Groundcover Dianella revo/uta 'Little Rev' Blue Flax Lily 5 gallon 2' x 2' Perennial L Pennisetum 'Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Groundcover Evergreen Deciduous; late summer -fall color I I Golden flag -like summer flowers Grass -like blue foliage Cream -white summer flowers Neighborhood Street North / South Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Lagerstroemia indica x Natchez Crape Myrtle 36" box 20' x 20' Standard L Deciduous; white summer fauriei 'Natchez' flowers and fall foliage color East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x 'Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M Evergreen; minor flowing and fruit Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street) Coprosma petriei 'Verde Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon Tx 4' Variegated L Vista' Shrub Myrtus communis Dwarf Myrtle 5 gallon Tx 3' Shrub L 'Compacta' Ilex vomitoria 'Stoke's Stoke's Dwarf Yaupon 5 gallon 3' x 4' Shrub L Dwarf' Holly Rhaphio/epis umbellata Dwarf Yedda Hawthorn 5 gallon Tx 4' Shrub L 'Minor' Entry Median Entry Median Tree (in 12'-16' wide median with understory planting) Cercis canadensis Oklahoma Western 48" box 25' x 25' Multi -trunk L 'Oklahoma' Redbud Understory Planting (combination of all species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' Bulb L 5SFof grasses Boute/oua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Cistus 'Sunset' Coprosma petriei 'Verde Vista' Salvia x 'Heatwave Glitter Sage' Creeping Rock Rose 5 gallon 2' x 6' Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon Tx 4' Lilac Blooming Salvia 5 gallon 3' x 3' Cream -margined gray -green variated foliage Compact evergreen shrub with minor creamy -white flowers Tight branching evergreen shrub; select male Upright evergreen shrub with coppery -red new growth Deciduous; magenta flowers spring Deep pink bloom in late summer; plant in natural groupings within grasses Golden flag -like summer flowers Groundcover Groundcover L Magenta flowers spring -summer Variegated L Cream -margined gray -green Shrub variated foliage Flowing L Lilac blooms spring -fall Shrub Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 127 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Sports / Transit District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Major District Connector B East and Allee Street and Allee Tree (in 4' wide continuous planting area with understory planting) P/atanus racemosa California Sycamore 48" box 80' x 50' Standard L-M Deciduous; late summer -fall color Understory Planting (a combination of grasses in natural groupings with flowering seasonal accents) Boute/oua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Golden flag -like summer flowers groundcover Dianella revo/uta 'Little Rev' Blue Flax Lily 5 gallon 2' x 2' Perennial L Grass -like blue foliage Pennisetum 'Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon 3' x 3' Grass/ L Cream -white summer flowers groundcover Minor District Connector Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Lophostemon conferta Brisbane Box 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L Evergreen Understory Planting (See Uptown Sports / Transit District Neighborhood Street Understory Plant List below) Neighborhood Street North / South Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Lagerstroemia indica x Natchez Crap Myrtle 36" box 20' x 20' Standard L Deciduous; white summer faudei'Natchez' flowers and fall foliage color East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x 'Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M Evergreen; minor flowing and fruit Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street) Dietes 'Variegata' Variegated Dietes 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Grass -like with creamy flowers Perennial spring -summer Pennisetum 'Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon 3' x 3' Grass/ L Cream -white summer flowers Groundcover Entry Median Entry Median Tree (in 12'-16' wide median with understory planting) Cercis canadensis Oklahoma Western 48" box 25' x 25' Multi -trunk L Deciduous; magenta flowers 'Oklahoma' Redbud spring Understory Planting (combination of all species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) ; see Uptown Sports / Transit District Secondary Gateway Understory Plant List below) Minor District Connector Median Median Tree (in 12'-16' wide median with understory planting) Cercis canadensis Oklahoma Western 48" box 25' x 25' Multi -trunk L Deciduous; magenta flowers 'Oklahoma' Redbud spring Understory Planting (combination of accent plants for color and texture contrast) Cistus x hybridus White Rockrose 5 gallon 4' x 8' Flowering L White flowers spring -summer Shrub Coprosma petriei 'Verde Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon 3' x 4' Variegated L Cream -margined gray -green Vista' Shrub variated foliage Dietes 'Variegata' Variegated Dietes 5 gallon 3' x 3' Flowering L Grass -like with creamy flowers Perennial spring -summer Pennisetum 'Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Cream -white summer flowers Groundcover Rosa 'Icecap' White Flowering Rose 5 gallon 2' x 5' Flowering L Creamy -white flowers spring - Shrub summer Westringia fruticosa Dwarf Coast Rosemary 5 gallon 4' x 4' Variegated L Cream -margined gray -green 'Morning Light' Shrub variated foliage 128 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Sports / Transit District (Continued) Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Secondary Gateway A Understory Planting (combination of 3 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per 3' x 1' Bulb L Deep pink flowers in late 5 SF of summer; plant in natural grasses groupings within grasses Boute/oua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Golden flag -like summer flowers Groundcover Cistus 'Sunset' Creeping Rock Rose 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L Magenta flowers spring -summer Groundcover Coprosma petriei 'Verde Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon 3' x 4' Variegated L Cream -margined gray -green Vista' Shrub variated foliage Salvia x 'Heatwave Glitter Lilac Blooming Salvia 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowing L Lilac flowers spring -fall Sage' Shrub Uptown Arts District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Minor District Connector Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) I Rhus /ancea African Sumac 36" box 30' x 30' III Standard L Understory Planting (See Uptown Arts District Neighborhood Street Understory Plant List below) Neighborhood Street North / South Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Lagerstroemia indica x Natchez Crape Myrtle 36" box 20' x 20' Standard L fawiei 'Natchez' East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x 'Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M Understory Planting (Select one plant pairing below, use on both sides of street per block; arrange in natural groupings): Plant Pairing 1: Salvia /eucantha 'Santa Santa Barbara Mexican 5 gallon 3' x 3' Flowering L Barbara' Bush Sage Perennial Ses/eria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Groundcover Plant Pairing 2: Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon Verbena lilacina 'De La De La Mina Verbena 5 gallon Mina' Plant Pairing 3: Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue Me/ampodium /eucanthum Blackfoot Daisy Plant Pairing 4: Tx 3' Grass/ L Groundcover 3' x 3' Flowering L Perennila 5 gallon 3' x 3' Grass/ L Groundcover 5 gallon 18"x 18" Flowering L Perennial Rosa californica California Wild Rose 5 gallon 4' x 4' Flowering L Shrub Evergreen; select male Deciduous; white summer flowers and fall foliage color Evergreen, minor flowing and fruit Deep purple flowers spring -fall Cream to bronze flowers summer -fall Evergreen Purple flowers spring -fall Evergreen Grey -green foliage with white flowers early spring -fall Deciduous; pink flowers spring - summer Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 129 .0 APPENDIX 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Uptown Arts District (Continued) Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Secondary Gateway B Understory Planting (combination of 3 to 5 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon 3' x 3' Grass/ L Groundcover Iris doug/asiana Douglas Iris 1 bulb per 2' x 2' Bulb L 5SFof grasses Rosmarinus officinalis Creeping Rosemary 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L 'Huntington Carpet' Groundcover Salvia /eucantha 'Santa Santa Barbara Mexican 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Barbara' Bush Sage Perennial Santolina chamaecyparissus Dwarf Sea Cotton 5 gallon 3' x 3' Flowering L 'Nana' Groundcover Ses/eria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass 5 gallon 2' x 5' Grass/ L Groundcover Creekside Village District Species Common Name Container Mature Form Size Size Major District Connector C Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Evergreen Lavender blue flowers in late spring; plant in natural groupings within grasses Blue -purple flowers winter -spring Purple flowers spring -fall Gray foliage with yellow flowers in spring -summer Cream to Bronze summer -fall flowers Water Notes Needs Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine 36" box 40' x 30' Standard L-M Evergreen Understory Planting (single species per block with seasonal bulbs) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' 5 SF of grasses Boute/oua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Bulb L Grass/ L Groundcover Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon 3' x 3' Grass/ L Groundcover Minor District Connector Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Rhus /ancea African Sumac 36" box 30' x 30' Standard L Understory Planting (See Creekside Village District Neighborhood Street Understory Plant List below) Neighborhood Street East / West Street Tree (in 4' x 10' tree well with understory planting) Arbutus x 'Marina' Marina Madrone 36" box 35' x 35' Standard L-M Understory Planting (single species per block, both sides of street) Boute/oua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Groundcover Deep pink bloom in late summer; plant in natural groupings within grasses Golden flag -like summer flowers Evergreen Evergreen; select male Evergreen, minor flowing and fruit Golden flag -like summer flowers Pennisetum 'Bunny Tails' Fountain Grass 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Cream -white summer flowers Groundcover Sesleria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass 5 gallon 2' x 5' Grass/ L Cream to Bronze summer -fall Groundcover flowers Nooks 130 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDI 4.1.1 Recommended Plant List by District Creekside Village District (Continued) Species Common Name Container Mature Form Water Notes Size Size Needs Secondary Gateway A Understory Planting (combination of 3 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Amaryllis belladonna Naked Ladies 1 bulb per Tx 1' Bulb L Deep pink flowers in late 5 SF of summer; plant in natural grasses groupings within grasses Boute/oua 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 5 gallon 2' x 2' Grass/ L Golden flag -like summer flowers Groundcover Cistus 'Sunset' Creeping Rock Rose 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L Magenta flowers spring -summer Groundcover Coprosma petriei 'Verde Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon 3' x 4' Variegated L Cream -margined gray -green Vista' Shrub variated foliage Salvia x 'Heatwave Glitter Lilac Blooming Salvia 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowing L Lilac flowers spring -fall Sage' Shrub Secondary Gateway B Understory Planting (combination of 3 to 5 species for color and texture contrast and seasonal accent) Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 5 gallon Tx 3' Grass/ L Evergreen Groundcover Iris doug/asiana Douglas Iris 1 bulb per 2' x 2' Bulb L Lavender blue flowers in late 5 SF of spring; plant in natural groupings grasses within grasses Rosmarinus officinalis Creeping Rosemary 5 gallon 2' x 6' Flowering L Blue -purple flowers winter -spring `Huntington Carpet' Groundcover Salvia /eucantha 'Santa Santa Barbara Mexican 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Purple flowers spring -fall Barbara' Bush Sage Perennial Santolina chamaecyparissus Dwarf Sea Cotton 5 gallon Tx 3' Flowering L Gray foliage with yellow flowers 'Nana' Groundcover in spring -summer Ses/eria autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass 5 gallon 2' x 5' Grass/ L Cream to Bronze summer -fall Groundcover flowers Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 131 4.0 APPENDIX _ 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District The following matrices outline the specific paving and site furnishings associated with the District. Refer to Section 2.0 for the Street Typology Section and Section 3.0 for layout plans. Uptown Center District Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Major District Connector A Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Paving - Furnishing Zone Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Tree Grate Neenah / R-8815-b Natural Cast Iron 4'-0" x 10'-0" Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Major District Connector C Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o c. scr jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Paving - Furnishing Zone Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Minor District Connector Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts Alternating texture bands #5447 Paving - Furnishing Zone Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o c scr. jts. #5447 ; Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 16'Pole page 141 Finish Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5'-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c. scr. jts. See cutsheet for model # Site Furnishings i Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish 132 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards IL 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Center District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Primary Gateway and Secondary Gateway A Paving - Corner or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8" x 8" Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 133 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District The Following matrices outline the specific type, dimensions and design parameters associated with the hardscape paving and site furnishings materials by district. Refer to Section 2.0 for the Street Typology and Section 3.0 for layout plans. Uptown Hotel / Tourism District Product Manufacturer / Model Major District Connector A Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff #5447 Paving - Furnishing Zone Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Finish Dimensions Notes Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands aggregate) Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern Tree Grate Neenah / R-8815-b Natural Cast Iron 4'-0" x 10'-0" Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Major District Connector B East Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Major District Connector B Allee Paving - Pedestrian and Creekside Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr jts Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Site Furnishings Street Light (Street Side) Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Pedestrian Light (Creekside) Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Boulders Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5'-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c scr. jts Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish 134 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Hotel / Tourism District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Entry Median Paving - Maintenance Path Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings 4.0 APPENDI Dimensions Notes 4" x 16" x 2" Full length pieces Tree Accent Uplighting B-K Lighting / Integral TBD 2 per Tree Artistar LED Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards I Uptown Sports / Transit District j Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Major District Connector B East Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o c. scr jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 135 4.0 APPENDIX ..- _ 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Sports / Transit District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Major District Connector B Allee Paving - Pedestrian and Creekside Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Site Furnishings Street Light (Street Side) Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Pedestrian Light (Creekside) Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # Boulders Minor District Connector Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts #5447 Paving - Furnishing Zone Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. #5447 Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured I 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5'-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c. scr. jts. Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Entry Median Paving - Maintenance Path Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Full length pieces mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Tree Accent Uplighting B-K Lighting / Integral TBD 2 per Tree Artistar LED Minor District Connector Median Paving - Maintenance Path Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Full length pieces mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Tree Accent Uplighting B-K Lighting / Integral TBD 2 per Tree Artistar LED 136 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Sports / Transit District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Primary Gateway and Secondary Gateway A Paving - Comer or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Dimensions Notes 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8" x 8" Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards Uptown Arts District Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Minor District Connector Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. #5447 Paving - Furnishing Zone Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. #5447 Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 137 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Uptown Arts District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5'-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c. scr. jts. Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Secondary Gateway B Paving - Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 000 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8" x 8" Tertiary Gateway Paving - Corner or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8" x 8" Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards 138 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards NEML 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Creekside Village District Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Dimensions Notes Major District Connector C Paving - Pedestrian and Frontage Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 Cast -in -place Concrete Type 2 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #25 (exposed 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts. Alternating texture bands #5447 aggregate) Paving - Furnishing Zones Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Site Furnishings Street Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 20' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 141 Finish Minor District Connector Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts #5447 Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Neighborhood Street Paving - Pedestrian, Frontage and Furnishing Zones Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) Alternating 5'-0" #5447 and 2'-6" o.c. scr. jts. Site Furnishings Pedestrian Light Sternberg / See Cutsheet Dark Bronze Textured 15' Pole See cutsheet for model # page 142 Finish Primary Gateway and Secondary Gateway A Paving - Corner or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8" x 8" Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 139 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Creekside Village District (Continued) Product Manufacturer / Model Finish Secondary Gateway B Paving - Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix, Grind mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Dimensions Notes 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 000 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8" x 8" Tertiary Gateway Paving - Corner or Bulb -Out Concrete Unit Paver Acker -Stone/ Equal Face Mix. Grind 4" x 16" x 2" Running Bond pattern mix blend of Mesa Buff, Mocha Brown and Amber Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Stamped Asphalt w/ 8" White Pattern Paving Products / Natural Cement with 8" 10' Wide Outline Natural Cement CSTA-TL White Outline 8" x 8" Non -Gateway Paving - Bulb -Out Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) 5'-0" o.c. scr. jts Score joint grid #5447 Paving - Ramp Cast -in -place Concrete Type 1 Davis Colors / Mesa Buff Topcast #5 (sandblast) City of Truncated Domes per City of #5447 Temecula Temecula Standard Standard 402 Paving - Crosswalk Paint per City of Temecula Standards 140 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.1.3 Site Furnishing Product Cut Sheets Product Cut Sheets Street Light TBD CD I 1�LID `!r �I SIDEWALK SIDE STREET SIDE 0 U N ARM/FIXTURE O BANNER ARMS J ACCESS DOOR ARM/FIXTURE r F N m �a i� �U V = m � q d P] mQ to n N Ia. LED SOURCE 04 1OARC40T2 140 LED'S, V a 1 � yg 158w, 4,000K 9 rn� TYPE 2 DISTRIBUTION 15 1 aN-1 9 c, ra LED LIGHT SOURCE 09 UU p7 rn1 _ —EZ HANG STRAIGHT g » c - COUPLING U y) `m to w f� ORWR COMPARTMENT ¢ Q - 2-6 1/2 —I .-27" DIA. ROUND EDGE F o SHADE O FLAT HEAVY DIFFUSE ACRYLIC LENS LED SOURCE 6ARC40T2 84 LED'S, l 94w, 4,000K TYPE 2 DISTRIBUTION 0 EZ HANG STRAIGHT COUPLING b DRWR COMPARTMENT M1^ 2i' DIA ROUND EDGE SHADE FLAT HEAVY DIFFUSE ACRYLIC LENS THE 7/87 DIA BANNER ARMS ARE 37" APART FROM THE TOP 20 �{ OF THE UPPER ARM, TO THE BOTTOM OF THE LOWER ARM BANNER ARMS SET FOR = 18" X 36" BANNERS 4 N BANNERS BY OTHERS 6" DIA. ALUMINUM ROUND¢ STRAIGHT SMOOTH POLE N _ � I m � 24" DIA, TWO PIECE CLAMP ON BASE WITH ONE ACCESS DOOR SPLIT BASE PROVIDED WITH INTERNAL r ANCHORING TABS I (HARDWARE BY OTHERS) SEE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS 1 Description Decorative Vehicular and Pedestrian LED Light with Banner Kit Manufacturer: Sternberg Lighting Product Number: 1 A-1527LED-R-I0ARC40T2- MDL03-SV2-EZ / OBPM / 1AM- 1521 LED-R-6ARC40T2-MDL03- SV2-EZ / OBPM / 9720ARSS / DBA /BCC4/DBT Finish: Dark Bronze Textured Finish Pole Height: 20- 0" Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 141 .0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Pedestrian Light Afm6 iiM A6c665ery Orientation O05PM 160 Double Banner Arm IDEA) 0 1B0° I • • 0° (4) 3/4" X 18" Anchor Bole, 10" Bolt Circle, Diamond pattern Access Door Orientation: 0° Street Side Orientation: 160° "Sternberg Lighting ESTABLISHED 1923 / EMPLOYEE OWNED 666 Lawrence Avenue I ItmNle, IL -I P617.6R.] I'-e elerneerallahftna wen CONCEPNAL ASSEMBLY DRAVANG. SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING VERIFICATION BY THE FACTCRY ARM ARM MOUNTED FIXTURE, 1621LED 1521 Omega decorative downlight fixtire features a spun aluminum bell styled had wrn elaredw randed 4dpa An aluminum casting is attached to the upper portion of IfM 66N WW kaeon oeryAng to alII6Ad rme FhWfP (eaaaca WNkd and rolaOWie optics Available with flat, sag, ~a FPfled glass Shade Style & Round IN) Mounting LIGHT SO U RC E;-15ARCA433.111 QL03-5112 Array 6ARC (64 LEDS, 94 Wafts) (6ARC) Color Temp: 4000K (40) Distribution: Type 2 (T2) Driver: Multi -Volt Dimmable Low -Range Dnver, 120-277V (MDL03) Lens: Flat Diffuse Acrylic Lens (SV2) ARM:OBSPM OBSPM POLE' 771 M-.2d0 The 16' diameter cast 356 aluminum alloy base and aluminum shaft shall be a one-piece onsbucbon The pole shall be U L or E T L listed in U S and Canada All pole heights to have a tolerance of i 2" Model: 7700 (77) Height: 15 Ft (15) Shaft Type Smooth Straight 5 Inch, 6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy(P5) Gauge: 0 250 (250) �4 4" Ball Center Cap - BCC4 FINISH: DBT Assembly shall be powder coated to Dark Bronze Textured finish Prior to coating, Ore embty shall be chemically cleaned and etched in a 5-stage washing system which Includes alkaline cleaning, rinsing, phosphoric etching, reverse osmosis water rinsing, and non -chrome sealing to ensure corrosion resistance Wind Load Eveaf� This assembly, as configured, MEETS AASHTO requirements for wind loading Wind Speed: 90 mph Gust Factor: 1 14 daa!larva Temewpl SlfBetedaPa Clelomer a*uMexe Drawing a21954 Job Location Temecula, CA Date: 2018/04/18 1 of2 F Z Description Decorative Pedestrian LED Light with Banner Kit Manufacturer: Sternberg Lighting Product Number: 1521LED-R-6ARC40T2-MDL03-SV2 / DBSPM / 7715P5-.250 / BCC4 / DBA / DBT Finish: Dark Bronze Textured Finish Pole Height / Mounting Height: 15'0"/11'6" 142 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Pedestrian Light (Continued) Sternberg Lighting 7 ESTABLISHED 1923 / EMPLOYEE OWNED 555 Lawrence Avenue I Roselle, IL 60172 1 p 847.588.3400 1 www stemberglighting.com CONCEPTUAL ASSEMBLY DRAWING, SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING VERIFICATION BY THE FACTORY Job Name: Temecula streetscape Customer Signature: _LI _ 1AL is =r t. e Drawing #21954 Job Laralion: Temecula, CA Date: 2018/04/18 2 of 2 o0i i� r8 Z C 3 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 143 4.0 APPENDIX 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Tree Grate Description Tx 10' Extended Collection, Cast R.8815-B Iron lWo-Piece Grate Manufacturer: Neenah Enterprises, Inc. Extended Collection Tree Grate Product Number: R-8815-B qq n 48" x 120" Finish: Natural Cast Iron Dimensions: 48" x 120" s _ Tree Hole Diameter: �` 39 18 Finish: Natural Cast Iron 144 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards I, 4.0 APPENDI 4.1.2 Recommended Paving and Site Furnishings by District Product Cut Sheets (Continued) Silva Cell �E:SCAPE APPIlGTIOX I CONCRETE.IN I lx SILVA CELL SYSTEM FOR CONCRETE PAVING ONAGGREGAIEBASE' SAMPIf P1A11 TYPIGLWxdegNeAIXNF01Ae mNEALWNOIEVeITNF o1NINfi TINGI WXWNxIMVEMHIf S[CIINN TYIIfAIWXpofiXlf➢fiEoiexYA®ItlMIVP I �II� Il II I I II B II I I li 11 II I I vAYx IV ! � II II I I m II ! II II I --rsnNtr �....d q V,Wg II II �Cr�nrral�— I II II II I i II fi•MIN, � - e � ° �• . _ ..fir—:.- I e N P { I. A I � n •7�i E e p{I f? {I uD r I T a N I ! n ItpTop II i II II II I I II II II I II [I II I I n u n I it Jl II —"--------- ---- — STREEFS[FPEM"CATrONI OONIUMb I INSILVACELL SYSTEM FOR CONCRETE PAVING ON AGGREGATE BASE•SECTION Description Silva Cell planting system for large canopy street trees Manufacturer: deeproot Product Number: XXX �Ar •As��o��.�� WSeaNWa � lj e r u. come f\%nVtJ� wra.A�.e�eo. 0 0 _ _W TYPICAL SILVA CELL .NNA KEY PLAN Q 9lYARILSYSTFM �q IASE, ANoloelSl O z Qe YAevi AoOf INNYEx e6eALLNAELILIAWA®ITm WNIAIf �% �ef1�q KXI Q ©--PAaAGE.mvMIEf p§ QI.r MIEIOLPIACEDHI EEEIPENM QE roemNxcn PAYNeoa, nnNoo.vmxnAl Ever oPr.� wQ i ( 1•AfiG[GIF NASEmxINE V S ©GmEfANEMEWEMEIOAVAM w O dSAYA (ELLONII IXSlAUIXrINR MeN Xu. `MF111Eo�GE9KRO IQ fifiSSN o m N XE RAME1FA a 31S1[M WIEN r mE lfiu[wAIm MON wq O 5 ,N.o N1ESSIWEAT0FXDEM N�. QeAAvrnPTN;sNuuxfieNnfiNomwvAEau � a : �nAxeNfisoxxnAUNa•[NREAt>IWNPAcrtommWNMocme u a ©SAVAGILMSFSEofESNMNY 1 > g � QM PmTSPMNGIFiWEFxxIVAQLLEATeME '1 N � : Qx K•AxxAecAmATEweeAstrnxrAnWmesNPwoaoA Oo aaEExEN¢EANe[nAnnemwAfisNEgiEweeA¢ I ©gmAAA WE.rAcxommP,KYnA NOTES LlfxYTM101EEGMEI®xA�1XRMMMMXNKNAFNS9WEG11Me �WNWrxENurnxa I NNIN[NANENFNfxIxAGmM WNYA911exNYAirtwNWfWIIFNxf[x C ONCHL541 In v.r .eon altMnYY Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 145 4.0 APPENDI 4.2 Strategies for Low Impact Development The City of Temecula is considering preparation of a Stormwater Master Plan for the Uptown Temecula District. The goal for this plan is to assess capacity and feasibility for treatment of stormwater run-off within the right-of-way through the use of low impact development measures (LIDs), particularly flow -through planters. This section discusses issues related to integration of LIDS within the urban design framework outlined in the Sidewalk Standards document. A flow -through planter is designed to filter pollutants and sediment from surface stormwater run-off. Generally, layers of organic materials (mulch, plants and soil) in combination with drainage material such as crushed rock, capture and treat stormwater contaminants and --where native soil conditions permit-- allow the water to infiltrate and recharge groundwater and/or evaporate. Where native soils are not conducive to infiltration (a common condition in our region), stormwater is collected, stored and treated and conveyed to the City stormwater system. In either case flow -through planters are designed to accommodate peak flow during storm events and incorporate a prescribed amount of void area or freeboard at the surface, to serve as a reservoir during periods of heavy inundation. CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL SW-12 FINISHED ELEVATION (FE) CURB INLET OVERFLOW STRUCTURE DETAIL SW-17. ELEV. (OE) GUTTER INLET 4" MIN. EXPOSED WALL ELEV (GIE) 3" MULCH HEIGHT 1.AY£R �— STR FT. 6" MIN+12" MAX PONDING SIDEWALK . 24- MIN iF DEEP CURB _I I HECIUIREO j I DETAIL SW-13 2" MIN- UNDERDRAIN AND OVERFLOW - CONNECT TO STORM DRAIN OR 6" MIN NATIVE SOIL BENCH, 6" MIN APPROVED DISCHARGE 12 PREFERRED OR AS LOCATION DIRECTED BY CIVIL OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER -- CALTRANS CLASS 2 PERMEABLE MATERIAL (AGGREGATE). DEPTH LEGEND PER PROJECT REQUIREMENTS OR ®MULCH/COMPOST LAYER MINIMUM 12", SEE DESIGN NOTE 10 (SEE DESIGN NOTE 12) BIORETENTION SOIL MEDIA (BSM) UNDERDRAIN, MIN. 4" DIA. PVC ® AGGREGATE SDR 35 PERFORATED PIPE, NATIVE SOIL SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTE 4 ® ® ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1 MAINTAIN UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL BENCH TO SUPPORT ADJACENT SIDEWALKIROAD SEQUENCE WORK TO CONSTRUCT CURBS BEFORE EXCAVATING BIORETENTION AREA FOR AGGREGATE AND BSM 2 SCARIFY SUBGRADE BEFORE INSTALLING BIORETENTION AREA AGGREGATE AND BSM 3 FACILITY EXCAVATION TO ALLOW FOR SPECIFIED AGGREGATE, BSM, AND MULCH DEPTHS TO ACHIEVE FINISHED ELEVATIONS ON CIVIL PLANS 4 INSTALL UNDERDRAIN WITH HOLES FACING DOWN TOP OF UNDERORAIN 6" BELOW TOP OF AGGREGATE LAYER UNDERDRAIN SLOPE MAY BE FLAT 5 COMPACT EACH 6" LIFT OF BSM WITH LANDSCAPE ROLLER OR BY LIGHTLY WETTING IF WETTING, LET DRY OVERNIGHT BEFORE PLANTING 6 DO NOT WORK WITHIN BIORETENTION AREA DURING RAIN OR UNDER WET CONDITIONS 7 KEEP HEAVY MACHINERY OUTSIDE BIORETENTION AREA LIMITS 6 STORMWATER SHOULD BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM BIORETENTION UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND DRAINAGE AREA VEGETATION IS STABILIZED. LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARD DETAILS A1PrmvFa6r STREET BIORETENTION PLANTER BOX, NO STANDARDPLANNO. IN PARKING, WITH UNDERDRAIN SW-4 DEVELOPED UNDER PROP 64 GRANT 1 08/31/2017 1 USE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORK CONSTRUCTION I SHEET 1 OF 2 CASOA LID Stormwater Management Standard Detail for Reference Only 146 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX Curb adjacent planting areas, bulb -outs and curb extensions can be great opportunities to locate flow -through planters within the streetscape. They not only reduce the quantity and improve the quality of stormwater runoff but can also contribute to the character of the streetscape and image of the District as a whole. However, when considering the integration of planters within the streetscape, design criteria must be defined to ensure pedestrian accessibility, comfort and safety. Additionally, planters must be designed to not only treat storm water run-off but also support the successful growth and long-term health of plant material. Planter size, depth and particularly plant selection are all critical components. These issues are discussed in further depth below, as well as Appeddix K of the City of Temecula "Green Street Design Criteria". Differences between Sloped and Ponding Surfaces: In many bioretention swales and rain gardens, soil surface is sloped, resulting in differing planting conditions across the structure. Plants located at the bottom where ponding occurs, will have different requirements than those placed on the sideslopes, which receive runoff, but not ponding. At 4 feet wide, the relatively narrow street planting section of the Uptown District makes it impossible to successfully implement planters with sloped sides. More likely, the flow -through planters will have a uniform surface and achieve required freeboard by depressing the finish grade to several inches below the finish surface of adjacent sidewalk, effectively creating a ponding condition throughout the planter. Plant Selection for LIDS: Critical factors in selecting plants for LIDS is their proximity to ponding water and the duration of time water will be present in the LID reservoir prior to percolation or conveyance to the storm system. Many plants that appear on general plant lists for LIDs include species that are well -suite for sloped sides of a swale but may not tolerate prolonged or frequent periods of inundation. As discussed above, a uniform surface that can accommodate ponding is assumed for flow -through planters within the urban streetscape. Consequently plant selection is limited to those plants that can withstand periods of inundation. While there are many options for rushes, grasses and other understory plants and perennials, most trees are unable to survive conditions in which they are subjected to inundation at the root crown. There are some tree species that are part of riparian plant communities (such as California Sycamores, White Alder or Australian Water Gum) that are adapted to these conditions. However their aggressive root systems and branching structures make them incompatible within the narrow confines of an urban streetscape. These criteria create a significant challenge to incorporating flow -through planters into a cohesive framework for street trees. Using a combination of street trees in conventional planters and understory planting in flow -through planters may provide a more flexible strategy. In addition, the flow -through planters may be located in bulb -outs and sidewalk extensions strategically located for stormwater collection. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 147 I, 4.0 APPENDI This appendix includes a plant list for Flow -through planters (Figure X). While there are other plants that are suitable for LIDs in Southern California, this list was refined to include plants that are tolerant of both wet and dry moisture conditions, locally available, relatively low maintenance and attractive year round and are native or locally adapted and non-invasive. In addition, project specific aspects of the design, for example right-of-way vegetation height limits, approved street and parking lot tree lists and fire hazard landscape requirements may further influence selection. As assessment of invasive species is constantly evolving, this plant list should be checked against the California inventory at www.cal-ipc.org. Planting Soils for LIDS: Specifying the correct soils for biofilitration areas is critical in order to achieve stormwater objectives and plant health. Soils must possess high enough infiltration rates to meet surface water draw down requirements, however infiltration must be slow enough to support the pollutant removal function of soils. Additionally, soil composition must support plant establishment and long-term health. Landscape design documents for LID projects must include a bioretention soil specification that specifies the exact materials to be used in the mix (aggregates and compost), the percent of each material included in the mix, how they are to be placed (i.e. in 8" to 12" lifts) and the soil mix depth. Pedestrian Safety and Access: As discussed, due to the narrow street planting section of the Uptown District, flow -through planters will likely have a uniform surface with a finish grade several inches below the finish surface of adjacent sidewalk, which may create a hazardous condition for pedestrians. A minimum 4" high curb (with block -outs or inlets to receive surface flow) or an 18" high steel decorative fence must be provided around the planter to mitigate the pedestrian trip/ fall hazard. Alternatively, in some situations, planters can be designed with steel grates, rock mulch or other material that finish flush with adjacent pedestrian surface (though planters must be sized to accommodate the reservoir area usurped by the rock mulch). Flow -through planters located adjacent to on -street parking present additional challenges for pedestrian access. They should be located a minimum of 12" from the back of curb to provide a "step -off area" for pedestrians entering and exiting parked cars. The adjusted planter location must not create a pinch point in the pedestrian zone or impede the smooth flow of foot traffic. Continuous planters must provide ADA-compliant pedestrian crossing areas at regular intervals to ensure all people entering and exiting parked cars are able to do so without encumbrance. 148 Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 4.0 APPENDIX 4.2.1 Recommended Low Impact Development Plant List llplown Temecula LID Ptanl List Trees (locate onty In la er pow -through planters with sloped sides, outside areas subject to pondin watery Species Common name Size Form Water Notes Anus rhombifolia White Alder 70' x 40' Low branching standard L Deciduous; small woody cones in winter Cercis candensis'Oklahoma' Eastern Redbud 25' x 25' Standards or Multi L Deciduous; magenta flowers in early spring Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud 15' x 15' Multi L Deciduous; magenta flowers in eady spring CbIlopsis linearis'Purple Splendor Desert Willow 20' x 20' Multi L Deciduous Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 30' x 20' Standard; low branch standard L Evergreen Koelreuleria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree 40' x 40' Standard L-M Deciduous; yellow and red flowers and bracts Lagerstroemia indica'Muskogee' Crape Myrtle 25'x20' Standard and Multi L-M Deciduous; showy flowers; fall color Laurus nobilis Sweet Laurel 35' x 35' Standard L-M Evergreen Lophostemon conferta Brisbane Box 40' x 30' Standard L Evergreen Platanus mexicana Mexican Sycamore 70' x 50' Low branching standard L-M Deciduous Prosopis glandulosa'Maverick' Fremont Cottonwood 40' x 40' Mesquite L Deciduous; small green flowers; seed pods Quercus ilex Holly Oak 40' x 40' Standard L Evergreen Shrubs and Grasses Z:iperaes Common name Size Form Water Notes Baccharis pilulads'Pigeon Point' Coyote Brush Tx 8' Spreading groundcover L Mounding spreader aoutelou 'Blonde Ambition' Blue Grama Grass 2' x 2' Grass/ groundcover L Flag -like summer flowers Chondropetaium tectorum Cape Rush 4' x 4' Grass/ rush L Brown seeds at tips Cistus hybridus Rockrose 4' x 8' Flowering shrub L Magenta flowers in summer Cistus 'Sunset" Creeping Rock Rose 2' x 6' Groundcover L Magenta flowers spring -summer Dlanella revoluta Blue Flax Lily 2' x2' Grass/groundcover L Wide blue foliage Doles variegate Variegated Dietes Tx 3' Perennial L Grass -like with creamy flowers in spring -summer Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue Tx 3' Grass/ groundcover L Evergreen Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 8' x 8'+ Large shrub/ small tree L Evergreen; whiet flowers and red berries Iva hayesiana Marsh elder 3' x 6' Spreading groundcover L-M Spreading groundcover Juncus patens California rush 3' x 3' Grass/ rush L-M Gray green spreading rush Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 4' x 4' Grass L Golden efflorescence Muhlenbergla ca allariz'R el Mist' Pink Muhly 3' x 3' Grass L Pink efflorescence Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 149 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of )2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 19- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 2019, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Draft Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment Project EIR Addendum Prepared for City of Temecula November 2018 SCH #2013061012 r ESA Draft Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment Project FIR Addendum Prepared for November 2018 City of Temecula SCH #2013061012 626 Wilshire Boulevard r Suite 1100 r ESA Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 J www.esassoc.com J Bend Oakland San Francisco Camarillo Orlando Santa Monica Delray Beach Pasadena Sarasota Destin Petaluma Seattle Irvine Portland Sunrise Los Angeles Sacramento Tampa Miami San Diego OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY I ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Uptown Temecula Specific Plan EIR Addendum Paqe Introduction/Background........................................................................................................2 CEQA Authority for an Addendum........................................................................................3 Project Details and Background .................................... 1. Project Title ..................................................... 2. Lead Agency Name and Address ................... 3. Contact Person and Phone Number ............... 4. Project Location and Existing Site Conditions 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address............ 6. General Plan Designation ............................... 7. Zoning............................................................. 8. Project Description and Background .............. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting ............... 10. Required Approvals ........................................ Environmental Checklist ............................... I. Aesthetics ...................................... II. Air Quality ...................................... III. Biological Resources .................... IV. Cultural Resources ........................ V. Geology and Soils Seismicity........ VI. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......... VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality........ IX. Land Use and Planning ................. X. Noise ............................................. XI. Population and Housing ................ XII. Public Services .............................. XIII. Transportation/Traffic.................... XIV. Utilities and Service Systems ....... References List of Figures 1 Project Location..... 2 Existing Conditions Appendices A. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments B. Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards 24 24 26 29 32 34 38 41 44 46 49 50 52 56 60 62 21 22 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Specific Plan EIR Addendum ESA November 2018 UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN EIR Addendum Introduction/Background This document is an addendum to the Certified Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (Certified PEIR) (SCH #2013061012) prepared for the City of Temecula, which was approved by City Council in November 2015. The Certified PEIR analyzes the potential environmental impacts that may result from the implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which covers an area of approximately 560 acres. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), this Addendum analyzes the Proposed Specific Plan Amendment Changes and Landscape Design Guidelines ("the proposed Project") to the Certified PEIR for the City of Temecula (City) to determine whether the project would result in any new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts identified in the Certified PEIR. The Certified PEIR analyzed the adoption and implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan that would replace the existing land use, zoning, and planned development districts as the land use and design document for all future development in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. The overarching intent of the Specific Plan was to spark revitalization in the area by allowing for greater development flexibility and a wider array of land use and development options within the project area. In addition, the Specific Plan focuses on increasing mobility opportunities and facilitating alternative transportation options, including walking, biking, and transit, through the implementation of new "complete streets" roadway configurations, traffic calming strategies, pedestrian -oriented facilities, and bike lanes. The Specific Plan includes a form -based code to better define development regulations and design standards in order to encourage higher density urban development as well as facilitate a walkable, pedestrian -friendly environment through appropriate building placement, streetscape design, and a strong focus on the public realm. The Specific Plan land use mix includes residential, commercial, retail, office, employment, education, tourism, hotel, recreation, and arts -related uses. The approved Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and Certified PEIR are also referred to hereafter as the "Approved Project." The City of Temecula is processing a City -initiated Specific Plan Amendment (LR16-0223 and LR17-0724) for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The proposed amendment to the existing Specific Plan would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed clarification amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include various typo Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 2 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum corrections as well as, clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non -conforming uses, and the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law. The updated sections of the Specific Plan can be found in Appendix A, Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments, and Appendix B, Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. No construction activities are proposed as part of the recommendation; the minor amendments only clarify standards for future development projects. CEQA Authority for an Addendum The Certified PEIR includes all statutory sections required by CEQA, comments received on the Draft EIR, responses to comments on the Draft EIR, and supporting technical appendices. CEQA establishes the type of environmental documentation required when changes to a project occur after an EIR is certified. Specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that: The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requires a Subsequent EIR when an MND has already been adopted or an EIR has been certified and one or more of the following circumstances exist: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 3 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum environment but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Likewise, California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21166 states that unless one or more of the following events occur, no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report shall be required by the lead agency or by any responsible agency: Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the environmental impact report; 4. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the environmental impact report; or 5. New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the environmental impact report was certified as complete, becomes available. As demonstrated by the analysis herein, the proposed Project would not result in any additional significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously anticipated significant impacts. Rather, all of the impacts associated with the proposed Project would be within the envelope of impacts addressed in the Certified EIR and would not constitute a new or substantially increased significant impact. Based on this determination, the proposed Project does not meet the requirements for preparation of a Subsequent EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Project Details and Background Project Title Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Addendum 2. Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 3. Contact Person and Phone Number Dale West, Associate Planner II, (951) 693-3918 4. Project Location and Existing Site Conditions The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, which encompasses approximately 560 acres of land located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15 (I-15), south of Cherry Street, and east of Diaz Road, includes much of the City's first commercial development. Prior to the construction of 1-15, the area was once a vibrant and important community destination along the historic Highway 395. However, in recent decades, the area has developed under typical post - World War II development patterns —an eclectic mix of auto -oriented light industrial, office, strip -commercial, and retail uses serving the local community. Although many of the businesses Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 4 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum in the Project area are still economically viable, the City prepared the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan in order to implement the goals and policies of the Temecula General Plan, which include realizing the area's economic development potential through the creation of a new mixed -use community destination in proximity to I-15. 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address The City of Temecula. 6. General Plan Designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI). 7. Zoning Specific Plan — 14 (Uptown Temecula Specific Plan). 8. Project Description and Background Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and Certified PER (Approved Project) The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, adopted in November 2015, outlines the development and design standards for Uptown Temecula. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is approximately 560 acres of mostly developed land. The Specific Plan includes design guidelines, replaced existing land use plans and zoning regulations for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. Implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan was intended to guide future development, increase mobility opportunities and facilitating alternative transportation options, including walking, biking, and transit, through the implementation of new "complete streets" roadway configurations, traffic calming strategies, pedestrian -oriented facilities, and bike lanes. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan includes a form -based code to better define development regulations and design standards in order to encourage higher density urban development as well as facilitate a walkable, pedestrian -friendly environment through appropriate building placement, streetscape design, and a strong focus on the public realm. The land use mix would include residential, commercial, retail, office, employment, education, tourism, hotel, recreation, and arts - related uses. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is divided into six unique planning districts and two overlay zones. The planning districts include, Uptown Center, Uptown Hotel/Tourism Center District, Uptown Sports District, Uptown Arts District, Uptown Arts Wilder Hills- Residential Overlay, Creekside Village District, Creekside Village- Commercial Overlay, and Murrieta Creek Recreational District. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan development scenario accounts for land use mix assumptions applied to each planning district (Table 1). This approach provides a refined worst -case scenario that is useful in analyzing impacts. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan development scenario assumes that the gross land area of the planning districts with residential and non-residential development is reduced to account for future streets (30 percent) and surface or structure parking Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 5 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum (50 percent). It also assumes the FAR target for the various planning districts as follows: a FAR of 2.0 for all planning district except the Uptown Center District which would have a FAR of 2.5, assigns a percentage of residential and non-residential (commercial) development in each planning district, and applies a target density and unit size to the residential component. The new development is assumed to replace all existing development in the Specific Plan area, which currently totals approximately 3,800,00 square feet. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan development scenario would yield approximately 1.7 million square feet of commercial development, 3,726 dwelling units, and 315 hotel rooms of development at buildout. TABLE 1 UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Buildout District Name Commercial (sf)2 Residential (du) 1,3 Hotel Rooms Land Use Mix Assumptions Uptown Center 855,381 1,243 111 32%commercial; 68% residential Uptown 188,885 195 176 60% commercial; Hotel/Tourism 40% residential Uptown Sports 114,558 600 28 20% commercial; 80% residential Uptown Arts 384,322 1,303 0 20% commercial; 80% residential Creekside Village 139,833 385 0 20% commercial; 80% residential Total 1,682,979 3,726 315 NOTES: 1. Assumes 1,250 square feet for each unit; this calculation does not include common areas, hallways, stairwells, etc., of the residential development. (Source KMA, 2013). 2. Development is assumed at a FAR of 2.0 (building height of 4 stories) for all districts, except the Uptown Center District where a FAR of 2.5 (building height of 5 stories) was assumed. 3. Assumes a target residential density of 45 dwelling units per acre. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan was the subject of a Program EIR which analyzed the potential environmental impacts that may result from the adoption and implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The Certified PEIR provides a programmatic level of environmental impact analysis for a broad array of environmental topics for the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. The Certified PEIR analyzes the impacts of an estimated buildout scenario of residential units, offices, retail uses, restaurants, and hotel rooms. The Certified PEIR determined the implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would cause significant and unavoidable impacts to the following resource areas: air quality, cultural resources, and noise. All other resources areas were determined to have impacts that were either less than significant or less than significant with mitigation. Table 2, Summary of Certified PEIR Impacts and Mitigation Measures, includes a list of the impact statements the Certified PEIR determined required mitigation measures Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 6 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Environmental Impact Aesthetics TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF CERTIFIED PEIR IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation Measures Impact AES-1: The Project would significantly increase Mitigation Measure MM-AES-1: The following light and glare standards shall be applied to all future sources of light and glare throughout the Project area. development within the Specific Plan area: • The applicant shall ensure that all lighting fixtures contain "sharp cut-off' fixtures, and shall be fitted with flat glass and internal and external shielding. • The applicant shall ensure that site lighting systems shall be grouped into control zones to allow for opening, closing, and night light/security lighting schemes. All control groups shall be controlled by an automatic lighting system utilizing a time clock, photocell, and low voltage relays. • The applicant shall ensure that design and layout of the site shall take advantage of landscaping, on -site architectural massing, and off —site architectural massing to block light sources and reflection from cars. • Prior to the issuance of construction permits for a project -specific development within the Project area that includes outdoor lighting, the applicant shall submit an outdoor lighting plan and photometric plan to be reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula. The lighting plan shall be in compliance with Ordinance No. 655 as adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors and shall include, but not be limited to, the following information and standards: — Light fixtures shall not exceed 4,050 lumens; — Light fixtures shall be fully shielded so that light rays emitted by the fixtures are projected below the horizontal plane passing through the lowest point of the shield; — A map showing all lamp locations, orientations, and intensities, including security, roadway, and task lighting; — Specification of each light fixture and each light shield; — Total estimated outdoor lighting footprint, expressed as lumens per acre; and, — Specification of motion sensors and other controls to be used, especially for security lighting. • The City shall conduct a post -installation inspection to ensure that the site is in compliance with the design standards in Mitigation Measure MM-AES-1 and Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. • The use of highly reflective construction materials on exterior wall surfaces. The exterior of permitted buildings shall be constructed of materials such as high performance tinted non -mirrored glass, painted metal panels and pre -cast concrete or fabricated wall surfaces. Air Quality Significance after Mitigation Less than Significant Impact AIR-1: Construction activities associated with Mitigation Measure MM-AIR-1a: Future project -level development shall incorporate the following mitigation Significant and implementation of the Project would violate air quality measures to minimize emissions of NOx associated with construction activities for the Project: Unavoidable standards related to ROG and NOx emissions and would result in significant air quality impacts. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 7 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures • Construction activities shall require the use of 2010 and newer diesel haul trucks (e.g., material delivery trucks and soil importlexport) to the extent feasible.' Under conditions where it is determined that 2010 model year or newer diesel trucks are not readily available or obtainable for a project, the applicant shall be required to provide this evidence to the City and shall instead use trucks that meet USEPA 2007 model year NOx emissions requirements. 2 Off -road diesel -powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower (hp) shall meet USEPA Tier III off -road emissions standards. In addition, construction equipment shall be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARB. A copy of each unit's certified tier specification, BACT documentation, and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit shall be provided at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. Under conditions where a newer or alternative technology becomes available in the future that would result in either equivalent or larger reductions in NOx emissions than the use of tiered construction equipment, that technology shall be applied. Where alternatives to USEPA Tier III equipment are chosen for a project, the applicant shall be required to show evidence to the City that comparable NOx emissions reductions that are no less than what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine as defined by CARB regulations would be achieved. • After January 1, 2015, off -road diesel -powered construction equipment greater than 50 hp shall meet the Tier IV emission standards, where available. Under conditions where it is determined that equipment meeting Tier IV emission standards are not readily available or obtainable for a project, the applicant shall be required to provide this evidence to the City and shall instead use USEPA Tier III equipment. In addition, construction equipment shall be outfitted with BACT devices certified by CARB. Any emissions control device used by the contractor shall achieve emissions reductions that are no less than what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine as defined by CARB regulations. A copy of each unit's certified tier specification, BACT documentation, and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit shall be provided at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. Mitigation Measure MM-AIR-1b: Future project -level development shall incorporate the following in the construction specifications of a development project: • Require that construction -related equipment, including heavy-duty equipment, motor vehicles, and portable equipment, shall be turned off when not in use for more than five minutes. • Require that construction operations rely on the electricity infrastructure surrounding the construction site rather than electrical generators powered by internal combustion engines to the extent feasible. Mitigation Measure MM-AIR-1c: Future project -level development shall document project construction emissions prior to City approval of a project. If it is shown that a development would generate construction - related VOC emissions exceeding SCAQMD's threshold, the architectural coatings phase for that project shall use coatings and solvents with a VOC content lower than that required under SCAQMD Rule 1113. Significance after Mitigation CARB's On -Road Heavy -Duty Diesel Vehicle (In -Use) Regulation requires the phase -in of 2010 model year engines or equivalent by January 1, 2023. Under this regulation, PM and NOx emissions are projected to be reduced by approximately 3 tons per day and 88 tons per day, respectively, in 2023. 2 As the 2010 model year engines or equivalent would be gradually phased in over time in California, these engines may not always be readily available for the construction activities associated with the Project. As such, under these circumstances the USEPA 2007 model year NOx emissions standards, which were scheduled to be phased -in for heavy-duty highway engines between 2007 and 2010, would be used instead. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan $ ESA / Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure MM-AIR-1d: The City shall encourage all construction contractors to apply for SCAQMD "SOON" funds, which provides funds to accelerate clean up of off -road diesel vehicles such as heavy-duty construction equipment. Significance after Mitigation Impact AIR-2: Operational activities associated with As the regulation of ROG emissions from consumer products is beyond the City's control, no feasible mitigation Significant and implementation of the Project would violate air quality is currently available to reduce the amount of ROG emissions generated under the Project to the extent that Unavoidable standards related to ROG emissions and would result in these emissions would be below the SCAQMD's recommended threshold. significant air quality impacts at this program level. Impact AIR-3: For the purposes of this analysis, future Mitigation Measures MM-AIR-1a through MM-AIR-1d, as discussed above. Less than Significant project -level development construction activities Mitigation Measure MM-AIR-3: Prior to City approval of an individual development project that would have the associated with the implementation of the Project would construction equipment and activity listed below, a project -specific LST analysis shall be prepared and not have a significant localized impact when submitted that identifies the resulting construction emissions and demonstrates how the emissions would not construction activities: 1) would require no more than a exceed SCAQMD's LSTs or result in pollutant emissions that would cause or contribute to an exceedance of the maximum of six pieces of heavy-duty diesel equipment most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards. operating concurrently for eight hours per day; 2) involve no more than a maximum daily amount of 3,500 • Requires more than a maximum of six pieces of heavy-duty diesel equipment operating concurrently for cubic yards of dirt handling associated with grading eight hours per day; activities; 3) require no more than 10 miles of onsite • Involves more than a maximum daily amount of 3,500 cubic yards of dirt handling associated with grading travel by haul trucks per day; and 4) involve an onsite activities; storage (soil) pile of no more than 0.02 acres. It is a Requires more than 10 miles of on -site travel by haul trucks per day; and, possible that project -level development could exceed these construction activity thresholds, resulting in a • Involves an on -site storage (soil) pile of more than 0.02 acres significant localized air quality impact. Impact AIR-4: The Project could potentially expose Mitigation Measure MM-AIR-4: Prior to City approval of future project -specific residential developments within Less than Significant sensitive receptors to TACs from mobile sources on 1-15 the Project area and located within 500 feet of 1-15, a health risk assessment (HRA) shall be conducted to to an extent that health risks could result. evaluate the health risks to these residential developments associated with TACs from the mobile sources traveling along the portion of 1-15 that is adjacent to the Project area. Based on the findings in the HRA, appropriate measures shall be taken, if necessary, to reduce the cancer risk resulting from TAC-exposure from 1-15 to below 10 in one million for the maximally -exposed individual. These measures may include, but are not limited to, relocating the residential development beyond 500 feet of the freeway or implementation of appropriate Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) filters at the residential development. Biological Resources Impact 113I0-1: Project could result in direct and indirect impacts to special -status plants from future projects. Impacts could include trampling, crushing, grubbing, trimming or completely removing the plants or their habitat during construction. Construction equipment could introduce invasive weeds that could out -compete special status plants. All impacts to special status plants would be considered significant. Mitigation Measure MM-13I0-1: Prior to any ground -disturbing activities for individual development projects, pre -construction clearance surveys shall be conducted in accordance with Section 6.0 of the MSHCP for special -status plant species in suitable habitat areas that will be subject to ground -disturbing activities. The surveys will be conducted in the appropriate season. All special -status plant species observed shall be marked and afforded a level of protection within 100 feet of the construction footprint, per the terms and conditions of the MSHCP. As appropriate, the special -status or habitats of concern mapping within the construction limits shall be updated. A biologist will provide verification and report through memorandum to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Monitoring Program Administrator. Less than Significant Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 9 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Significance after Mitigation Impact BIO-2: Impacts to raptors and other migratory Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-2: Impacts to raptors and other migratory birds shall be avoided by the Less than Significant birds include direct loss of potential foraging and nesting implementation of one of the following measures: habitat. Potential nesting habitat onsite includes mature . All construction and ground disturbing activities shall take place outside of the raptor breeding season trees and shrubs as well as grassland (in the case of (February 1-August 30). ground -nesting birds such as northern harrier and mourning dove). It is possible that raptors and other • If construction and ground disturbing activities are necessary during the breeding season (February 1- migratory birds would nest onsite due to the proximity to August 30), a focused survey for active nests of raptors and migratory birds shall be conducted by a open space and riverine system of Murrieta Creek. biologist (a person possessing a bachelors in science with a minimum of one year nest survey experience performing raptor surveys). The survey shall occur a maximum of 14 days prior to any construction or ground -disturbing activities. If active nest(s) (with eggs or fledglings) are identified within the project site, (CDFW for state listed species, species of special concern, and MSHCP covered species; USFWS for birds covered under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and listed species) they shall not be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged (matured to a state that they can leave the nest on their own). A 500-foot construction setback from any active nesting location shall be adhered to in order to avoid disturbance of the nest until the young have fledged or the nest has failed, as determined by a qualified biologist. If no active nests are identified, construction may commence. Impact BIO-3: Burrowing owls could inhabit the site prior to project construction as appropriate burrowing owl foraging and nesting habitat is present. Suitable habitat would include the areas outside of land designated as Developed/Disturbed on Figure 3.3-1. Potential impacts to this species would include loss of foraging and nesting (i.e., burrowing) habitat. Individuals present during grading and other construction related activities have the potential to be killed or displaced through burrow collapse and other impacts. Mitigation Measure MM-13I0-3: Future development that occurs outside of land designated as Less than Significant Developed/Disturbed on Figure 3.3-1 shall be surveyed by a qualified biologist (i.e., approved by CDFW) using CDFW approved burrowing owl survey protocols a maximum of 30 days prior to construction to determine presence/absence of burrowing owl. If no burrowing owls are identified on the site during these pre -construction surveys, no additional mitigation is necessary and construction can commence. If burrowing owl(s) are found on -site, CDFW, the City, and RCA will be notified. The following species -specific mitigation actions would be required if burrowing owls are found: • Sheltering in place of nesting owls until nest fledges or fails, as determined by a qualified biologist (a Bachelor's of Science degree or equivalent experience and a minimum of one year of previous burrowing owl monitoring experience). • Preparing and implementing an active translocation plan, if appropriate and approved, and identifying a receptor site for the owl(s) (per WRC MSHCP and CDFW). Impact BIO-4: The proposed Project could result in Mitigation Measure MM-13I0-4: The specific MSHCP conservation objectives for fairy shrimp shall be met Less than Significant adverse effects to vernal pools and special -status vernal through implementation of the Riparian/Riverine Areas and Vernal Pools Policy presented in Section 6.1.2 of pool species (fairy shrimp) that may occur in flat, open the MSHCP. Prior to City approval of an individual development project located outside of land designated as areas between the developed portions of the project site Developed/Disturbed on Figure 3.3-1, an assessment of the construction footprint shall be conducted to and Murrieta Creek. Suitable habitat would include the determine whether suitable wetlands or seasonally inundated habitats (vernal pools, stock ponds, ephemeral areas outside of land designated as ponds, impoundments, road ruts, or other human -modified depressions) currently exist within the construction Developed/Disturbed on Figure 3.3-1. footprint. Wetland mapping assembled as part of that policy shall be reviewed as part of the project review process and, if suitable fairy shrimp habitat is identified on the wetland maps and cannot be avoided, a single - season dry or wet season survey for fairy shrimp species shall be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the sampling methods described in the 1996 USFWS Interim Survey Guidelines to Permittees for Recovery Permits under Section 10(a)(1)(A) of the Endangered Species Act for the Listed Vernal Pool Branchiopods. If survey results are positive, a certain percentage of the occupied portions of the property that provide for long-term conservation value for the fairy shrimp shall be conserved. The MSHCP provides general guidance which suggests ninety percent of the occupied portions of the site shall be conserved and ten percent Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 10 ESA / Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures of the occupied portions allowed for development under the MSHCP; however, the required conservation/impact ratio shall be determined by the RCA on a project -by -project basis. If listed branchiopods are detected, then the following restriction and protection will be implemented to avoid or minimize impacts to the resource during construction: Seasonal Vernal Pool Work Restriction. For seasonal avoidance of special -status vernal pool branchiopods and vernal pool -dependent species (e.g., western spadefoot toad), the contractor will not work within 250 feet of aquatic habitats suitable for these species (e.g., vernal pools and other seasonal wetlands) from October 15 to June 1 (corresponding to the rainy season), or as determined through informal or formal consultation with the RCA Monitoring Program Administrator and/or USACE. Ground -disturbing activities may begin once the habitat is no longer inundated for the season. If any work remains to be completed after October 15 exclusion fencing and erosion control measures will be placed at the vernal pools (or other seasonal wetlands) by the contractor under supervision of a biologist. The fencing will act as a buffer between ground -disturbing activities and the vernal pools and other seasonal wetlands as determined through consultations with the RCA Monitoring Program Administrator, and/or USACE. The biologist will document compliance through a memorandum during the establishment of the fencing activities submitted to the RCA Monitoring Program Administrator. Implement and Monitor Vernal Pool Protection. If temporary impacts can be avoided, the vernal pool(s) will be protected by erecting exclusion fencing. The contractor, under the supervision of the project biologist, will erect and maintain the exclusion fencing. Resource agency consultations with the RCA Monitoring Program Administrator and/or USACE will occur as needed. If vernal pools and/or listed branchiopods are detected, and an avoidance alternative is not feasible, then the following measures shall be implemented: Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP). In accordance with Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, a DBESP shall be prepared as part of an individual development project approval by the City to ensure replacement of any lost functions and values of habitat as it relates to vernal pools and listed branchiopods. The DBESP shall contain a mitigation strategy, subject to the approval of the RCA, which may contain on -site habitat creation and conservation, or off -site land acquisition in an approved mitigation bank for vernal pools and listed branchiopods; each is described below. On -site Habitat Creation. Should an avoidance alternative not be feasible, vernal pool basins and watershed shall be created on -site at a replacement ratio of 1:1, subject to the approval of the RCA. If on -site restoration is infeasible, an appropriate off -site location will be selected that exhibits the appropriate vernal pool soil conditions. The required off -site replacement ratio shall be determined by the RCA based on the specifics of the project. Vernal pool restoration sites shall be conserved in perpetuity through a conservation easement, deed restriction, or other appropriate mechanism. Specifications for the creation of habitat and a long-term monitoring program (typically five years, complete with success criteria) shall be included in the DBESP. Off -site Land Acquisition. Should both an avoidance alternative and habitat creation not be feasible, then off -site land acquisition in an approved mitigation bank for vernal pools and listed branchiopods shall be implemented at a replacement ratio of 1:1, subject to the approval of the RCA. The required replacement ratio shall be determined by the RCA on a project by project basis. Mitigation through off -site acquisition shall occur by purchasing vernal pool mitigation credits at the Barry Jones (aka Skunk Hollow) Wetland Mitigation Bank. Significance after Mitigation Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 11 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation Impact BIO-5: The proposed Project could result in Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-5: Prior to any ground -disturbing activities associated with individual development Less than Significant adverse effects to special status bats through the projects, a biologist or designee shall conduct a visual and acoustic survey for roosting bats according to disturbance or removal of roosting habitat (trees and accepted protocol. The biologist will contact the RCA Monitoring Program Administrator, and/or CDFW if any buildings) within the project site. hibernation roosts or active nurseries are identified within the construction footprint. The biologist will submit a memorandum documenting compliance to the RCA Monitoring Program Administrator. Bat Exclusion and Deterrence. During ground -disturbing activities, if individuals or groups of bats are found within the construction footprint, the bats shall be safely excluded by either opening the roosting area to change lighting and airflow conditions, or by installing one-way doors, or other appropriate methods specified by the RCA Monitoring Program Administrator and/or CDFW. The contractor will leave the roost undisturbed by project -related activities for a minimum of one week after implementing exclusion and/or eviction activities. The contractor will not implement exclusion measures to evict bats from established maternity roosts. The Biologist will submit a memorandum documenting compliance to the RCA Monitoring Program Administrator. Cultural Resources Impact CUL-1: The Project area has moderate to high Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-1: Individual development projects or other ground disturbing activities such as Less than Significant potential for significant archaeological resources, installation of utilities, shall be subject to a Phase I cultural resources inventory on a project -specific basis prior including prehistoric and historic period archaeological to the City's approval of project plans. The study shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist, defined as an deposits. Future development under the Project could archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for professional archaeology, and shall be significantly impact archaeological sites and/or sites of conducted in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and any other local Native American traditional cultural value to tribes. Development representatives expressing interest. The cultural resources inventory would consist of: a cultural resources occurring under the Project has the potential to result in records search to be conducted at the Eastern Information Center; scoping with the Native American Heritage significant impacts to these resources. Commission (NAHC) and with interested Native Americans identified by the NAHC; a pedestrian archaeological survey where deemed appropriate by the archaeologist; and recordation of all identified archaeological resources on California Department of Parks and Recreation 523 forms. If potentially significant cultural resources are encountered during the survey, the City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources and for significance as a historical resource or unique archaeological resource per CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. Recommendations shall be made for treatment of these resources if found to be significant, in consultation with the City and the appropriate Native American groups, including the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(3), project redesign and preservation in place shall be the preferred means of mitigation to avoid impacts to significant cultural resources, including prehistoric and historic archaeological sites, locations of importance to Native Americans, human remains, historical buildings, structures and landscapes. Methods of avoidance may include, but shall not be limited to, project re-route or re -design, project cancellation, or identification of protection measures such as capping or fencing. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(3)(C), if it is demonstrated that resources cannot be avoided, the qualified archaeologist shall develop additional treatment measures, which may include data recovery or other appropriate measures, in consultation with the City, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and any other local Native American representatives expressing interest. The City shall conduct consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, and any other local Native American representatives expressing interest, on a project -specific basis. In addition, the project proponent shall retain archaeological monitors and Native American monitors during ground -disturbing activities that have the potential to impact significant cultural resources as determined by a Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 12 ESA / Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures qualified archaeologist in consultation with the City, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, and any other local Native American representatives expressing interest in the project. During project -level construction, should prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a qualified archaeologist will be contacted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant, the archaeologist shall determine, in consultation with the City, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, and any other local Native American groups expressing interest, appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(3), project redesign and preservation in place shall be the preferred means to avoid impacts to significant cultural resources. Methods of avoidance may include, but shall not be limited to, project re-route or re -design, project cancellation, or identification of protection measures such as capping or fencing. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(3)(C), if it is demonstrated that resources cannot be avoided, the qualified archaeologist shall develop additional treatment measures in consultation with the City, which may include data recovery or other appropriate measures. All significant cultural materials recovered will be, as necessary and at the discretion of the consulting archaeologist and in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, and any other local Native American groups expressing interest, subject to scientific analysis, professional museum curation, and documentation according to current professional standards. Significance after Mitigation Impact CUL-2: Construction activities associated with Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-2: Project -level development involving ground disturbance and containing Significant and implementation of the Project could cause a substantial structures 50 years old or older shall be subject to a historic built environment survey, and potentially historic Unavoidable adverse change in the significance of a historical structures shall be evaluated for their potential historic significance, prior to the City's approval of project plans. resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section The survey shall be carried out by a qualified historian or architectural historian meeting the Secretary of the 15064.5, including the Gonzalez Adobe and other Interior's Standards for Architectural History. If potentially significant resources are encountered during the structures that are 50 years or older. survey, demolition or substantial alteration of such resources identified shall be avoided. If avoidance of identified historic resources is deemed infeasible, the City shall require the preparation of a treatment plan to include, but not limited to, photo -documentation and public interpretation of the resource. The plan will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to implementation. Impact CUL-3: The potential exists for significant Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-3: For project -level development involving ground disturbance, a qualified Less than Significant paleontological resources to be located beneath the paleontologist shall be retained to determine the necessity of conducting a study of the project area(s) based on ground surface in the Project area. Construction the potential sensitivity of the project site for paleontological resources. If deemed necessary, the paleontologist activities could result in the inadvertent discovery and shall conduct a paleontological resources inventory designed to identify potentially significant resources. The damage of these paleontological resources, which paleontological resources inventory would consist of: a paleontological resources records search to be would be a significant impact. conducted at the San Bernardino County Museum and/or other appropriate facilities; a field survey where deemed appropriate by the paleontologist; and recordation of all identified paleontological resources. The paleontologist shall provide recommendations regarding additional work for the project. Impacts to significant paleontological resources, if identified, shall be avoided. In addition, the project proponent shall retain paleontological monitors during construction for ground -disturbing activities that have the potential to impact significant paleontological resources as determined by a qualified paleontologist. In the event that paleontological resources are discovered, the project proponent will notify a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist will document the discovery as needed, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If fossil or Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 13 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation fossil bearing deposits are discovered during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find will be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The paleontologist will notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If avoidance is determined to be infeasible, the qualified paleontologist shall implement a paleontological mitigation program. At each fossil locality, field data forms shall be used to record pertinent geologic data, stratigraphic sections shall be measured, appropriate sediment samples shall be collected and submitted for analysis, and any other activities necessary for the timely and professional documentation and removal of fossils. Any fossils encountered and recovered shall be prepared to the point of identification, catalogued, and donated to a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials. Accompanying notes, maps, and photographs shall also be filed at the repository. Impact CUL-4: Ground -disturbing construction Mitigation Measure MM-CUL-4: Project -level development involving ground disturbance within the Project Less than Significant conducted throughout the Project area that is area shall address the potential discovery and proper treatment of human remains, which is always a potential associated with implementation of the Project could in areas that have not been previously disturbed or only partially disturbed through prior development. The City result in damage to previously unidentified human shall require that, if human remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the find remains. shall cease and the Riverside County coroner shall be contacted to evaluate the remains, following the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5 (e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines. If the County coroner determines that the remains are Native American, the coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). The NAHC will then designate a Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will engage in consultation to determine the disposition of the remains. Geology, Soils, and Seismicity Impact GEO-1: Construction activities associated with Mitigation Measures MM-HYD-1a and MM-HYD-1b Less than Significant future development could disturb soils that are protected by vegetation or expose soils covered by asphalt or concrete, resulting in soil erosion and loss of topsoil. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change Implementation of the Project would not result in significant global warming or climate change impacts. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impact HAZ-1: Construction activities occurring under Mitigation Measure MM-HAZ-1aFor individual development projects within the Project area, the applicant shall Less than Significant the Project may occur on sites containing retain a qualified environmental consulting firm to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in contamination, which could result in releases of accordance with ASTM standard E1527-05 prior to building permit approval. Any recommendations made in the hazardous materials. Phase I report as well as any remediation as required by the overseeing agency shall be completed prior to commencement of any construction activities. Mitigation Measure MM-HAZ-1b: Any subsurface materials exposed during construction activities that appear suspect of contamination, either from visual staining or suspect odors, shall require immediate cessation of excavation activities and notification of the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. Soils Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 14 ESA / Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Environmental Impact Hydrology and Water Quality Mitigation Measures suspected of contamination through visual observation or from observed odors, shall be segregated from other soils and placed on and covered by plastic sheeting and characterized for potential contamination in accordance with direction received from the County. If contamination is found to be present, any further proposed groundbreaking activities within areas of identified or suspected contamination shall cease and shall not resume until a site specific health and safety plan, prepared by a licensed professional and approved by Department of Environmental Health, has been completed and submitted to the City. Mitigation Measure MM-HAZ-1c: Any groundwater generated during construction dewatering shall be contained and profiled in accordance with Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) or Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility requirements depending on whether water will be discharged to storm drains or sanitary sewers. Any water that does not meet permitted requirements by these two agencies shall be transported offsite for disposal at an appropriate facility, or treated, if necessary to meet applicable standards, prior to discharge in accordance with approval from the RWQCB or Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility. Significance after Mitigation Impact HYD-1: Buildout of the Project would require Mitigation Measure MM-HYD-la: Development construction that disturbs one acre or more individually shall Less than Significant demolition of existing structures, pavement breaking, comply with the NPDES Construction General Permit regulations in effect at the time so as not to violate any ditching, and excavation; these activities could expose water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Compliance with the Construction General Permit and loosen sediment, which has the potential to mix with would include filing of a Notice of Intent with the SWRCB and the preparation of a SWPPP incorporating storm water runoff and degrade surface water quality. construction BMPs for control of erosion and sedimentation contained in stormwater runoff. Development Furthermore, construction would require the use of construction that disturbs less than one acre individually shall comply with the MS4 permit issued by the heavy equipment and construction -related chemicals, SDRWQCB in effect at the time so as not to violate any water quality standards or waste discharge such as concrete, asphalt, fuels, oils, antifreeze, requirements. Compliance with the MS4 permit for construction projects disturbing less than an acre would transmission fluid, grease, solvents and paints. These require the preparation of a construction BMP plan detailing erosion, sediment, and waste management control potentially harmful materials could be accidentally BMPs to be implemented throughout construction to be submitted and approved by the City of Temecula. spilled or improperly disposed of during construction Mitigation Measure MM-HYD-1 b: As a condition of approval, each future development project will be required and could wash into and pollute surface waters or to generate a project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), as required by the City of Temecula groundwater, which would result in a significant impact Stormwater Ordinance and as specified in the City's Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan, which will ensure to water quality. that the project implements specific water quality features to meet the City's MS4 Permit and Stormwater Ordinance requirements. Potential BMPs required by the WQMP include scheduling, minimization of vegetation disturbance, sandbags, vehicle fueling and maintenance in designated areas, and storm drain stenciling. This WQMP shall be reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit. Impact HYD-2: Chemicals used during the operation of Mitigation Measures MM-HYD-1a and MM-HYD-1 b, as discussed above Less than Significant the new commercial and residential structures could potentially discharge into surface waters either directly or during storm water runoff events, resulting in degradation of surface water quality. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Specific Plan EIR Addendum 15 ESA November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation Impact HYD-3: Construction of the proposed Mitigation Measure MM-HYD-1a, as discussed above Less than Significant development within the Project area would require activities such as pavement breaking, ditching, and excavation, which could temporarily alter the existing site's ground surface and drainage patterns, which could result in significant impacts related to water quality. Impact HYD-4: New development within the Project Mitigation Measures MM-HYD-1a and MM-HYD-1b, as discussed above Less than Significant area and changes in the extent of permeable or impermeable surfaces would alter the direction and volume of overland flows during both wet and dry periods and could result in increases in polluted stormwater. Land Use and Planning Implementation of the Project would not result in significant land use impacts. Noise and Vibration Impact NOI-1: Construction activities occurring at each Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-la: Prior to the issuance any grading or building permits for project -specific Significant and individual development site under the Project in the development, the applicant shall provide evidence to the City that the development will not exceed the City's Unavoidable Project area would expose their respective nearby land exterior noise standards for construction (see Table 3.10-5). If it is determined that City noise standards for uses to substantial increases in noise levels. construction activities would be exceeded, the applicant shall submit a construction -related exception request to Consequently, a substantial temporary or periodic the City Manager at least one week in advance of the project's scheduled construction activities, along with the increase in ambient noise levels would occur at the off- appropriate inspection fee(s), to ensure that the project's construction noise levels would be granted an site land uses. exception from the noise standards set forth in Section 9.20.040 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code. If a construction -related exception request is denied by the City, design measures shall be taken to reduce the construction noise levels to the maximum extent feasible to achieve compliance with the City's construction noise standards. These measures may include, but are not limited to, the erection of noise barriers/curtains, use of advanced or state-of-the-art mufflers on construction equipment, and/or reduction in the amount of equipment that would operate concurrently at the development site. Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-lb: Project -specific development located within the Project area shall: • Ensure that noise and groundborne vibration construction activities whose specific location on a construction site may be flexible (e.g., operation of compressors and generators, cement mixing, general truck idling) shall be conducted as far as possible from the nearest noise- and vibration -sensitive land uses. • Ensure that the use of construction equipment or construction methods with the greatest peak noise generation potential will be minimized. Examples include the use of drills and jackhammers. When impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and caisson drills) are necessary, they shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. Where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 16 ESA / Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures by up to about 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves shall be used where feasible; this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. Quieter procedures, such as use of drills rather than impact tools, shall be used whenever feasible. • Locate stationary construction noise sources away from adjacent receptors and muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds, incorporate insulation barriers, or other measures to the extent feasible. • Ensure that all construction truck traffic is restricted to routes approved by the City of Temecula, which shall avoid residential areas and other sensitive receptors, to the extent feasible. • Designate a construction relations officer to serve as a liaison with surrounding residents and property owners who is responsible for responding to address any concerns regarding construction noise and vibration. The liaison's telephone number(s) shall be prominently displayed at construction locations. • Hold a preconstruction meeting with the City's job inspectors and the general contractor or onsite project manager to confirm that noise and vibration mitigation and practices (including construction hours, sound buffers, neighborhood notification, posted signs, etc.) are implemented. Significance after Mitigation Impact N0I-2: Construction activities occurring at each Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-2a: The operation of construction equipment that generates high levels of Significant and individual development site under the Project in the vibration, such as large bulldozers, loaded trucks, and caisson drills, shall be prohibited within 45 feet of Unavoidable Project area may expose their respective off -site residential structures and 35 feet of institutional structures during construction of any project -specific residential and institutional land uses to vibration levels development in the Project area, to the extent feasible. Small, rubber -tired construction equipment shall be used that would exceed the applicable FTA vibration within this area during demolition and/or grading operations to reduce vibration effects where feasible. thresholds for building damage and human annoyance Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-2b: Operation of jackhammers shall be prohibited within 25 feet of existing for residential and institutional land uses. residential structures and 20 feet of institutional structures during construction activities associated with any project -specific development in the Project area, to the extent feasible. Impact N0I-3: New developments within the Project Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-3: For project -specific development, the applicant shall provide evidence to the Less than Significant area may introduce noise levels that could exceed the City that operational noise levels generated by the development would exceed the City's permissible exterior City's exterior noise standards at existing properties that noise standards. If City noise standards would be exceeded, design measures shall be taken to ensure that are located adjacent to and/or near the new operational noise levels would be reduced to levels that comply with the permissible City noise standards. development sites. These measures may include, but are not limited to, the erection of noise walls, use of landscaping, and/or the design of adequate setback distances for the new developments. Impact N0I-4: New developments within the Project Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-4a: Individual development projects shall minimize noise impacts from Less than Significant area could expose nearby sensitive resources to noise mechanical equipment, such as ventilation and air conditioning units, by locating equipment away from receptor levels exceeding 5 dBA due to operation of HVAC areas, installing proper acoustical shielding for the equipment, and incorporating the use of parapets into equipment. building design to ensure that noise levels do not exceed the ambient noise level on the premises of existing development by more than five decibels. Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-4b: Prior to City approval of a residential development project within the Project area, the applicant shall provide documentation to the City that all exterior windows associated with a proposed residential development will be constructed to provide a sufficient amount of sound insulation to ensure that interior noise levels would be below an Ldn or CNEL of 45 dB in any habitable room. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 17 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation Impact NOI-5: Due to changes in the community noise Mitigation Measure MM-NOI-5: Prior to City approval of a project -specific development within the Project area, Less than Significant environment in the Project area over the proposed the applicant shall provide evidence to the City that the City's noise/land use compatibility standards are met for Project's 20-year buildout period, the new land use the land use being developed. Measures that can be taken to ensure compliance with the City's noise/land use developments proposed in the Project area may not compatibility standards include, but are not limited to, the erection of noise walls, use of landscaping, and/or the meet the applicable noise/land use compatibility noise design of adequate setback distances. standards established by the City. Population and Housing Implementation of the Project would not result in significant population and housing impacts. Public Services Implementation of the Project would not result in significant public services impacts. Transportation and Traffic Impact TRA-1: The Project would result in significant Mitigation Measure MM-TRA-1: The City shall monitor the performance of the intersections listed below on an Less than Significant impacts at the following intersections under the Existing on -going basis and ensure that signal timing optimization occurs at these intersections prior to or concurrent (2013) Plus Project Conditions: with Project -related development that would increase the AM peak -hour delay by more than two seconds. 1. Ynez Road & Winchester Road . Ynez Road & Winchester Road — AM peak hour (Project's fair -share contribution for this mitigation 12. Nicholas Road & Winchester Road measure is 10 percent) • Nicholas Road & Winchester Road — AM peak hour (Project's fair -share contribution for this mitigation measure is 5 percent) Prior to the issuance of the initial building permit for each project -specific development within the Project area, the applicant shall pay its fair share, as determined by the City, toward the signal timing optimization for the intersections listed herein. Impact TRA-2: The Project would result in significant Mitigation Measure MM-TRA-2: The City shall monitor the performance of the intersections listed below on an Less than Significant impacts at the following intersections under Future Year on -going basis and ensure that the following improvements occur at these intersections prior to or concurrent (2035) Plus Project conditions: with Project -related development that would increase the AM peak -hour delay by more than two seconds. 4. Jefferson Avenue at Cherry Street/Proposed . At the intersection of Jefferson Avenue at Cherry Street / Proposed French Valley Parkway, the westbound French Valley Parkway — AM peak hour approach lane shall be re -configured from one left turn lane, two through lanes, and a shared through -right 13. Winchester Road at Murrieta Hot Springs Road — turn lane to two left turn lanes, one through lane and one shared lane (Project's fair -share contribution is AM peak hour 10 percent). 26. 1-15 Southbound Ramps and Temecula Parkway • At the intersection of Winchester Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road, add a right -turn overlap traffic — AM peak hour signal phase to the southbound direction (Project's fair -share contribution is 5 percent). • At the 1-15 Southbound Ramps and Temecula Parkway, add an exclusive right -turn lane to the northbound direction (Project's fair -share contribution is 5 percent). Prior to the issuance of the initial building permit for each project -specific development within the Project area, the applicant shall pay its fair share, as determined by the City, toward the improvements for the intersections listed herein. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 18 ESA / Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Significance after Environmental Impact Mitigation Measures Mitigation Utilities and Water Supply Assessment Impact UTL-1: The buildout of the Project would result in Mitigation Measure MM-UTL-1 a: Prior to the issuance of construction permits for a project -specific Less than Significant the need for larger diameter or parallel sewer lines for development within the Project area, the project applicant shall pay its fair share of Eastern Municipal Water three lengths of sewer pipe within the Project area, and the District mitigation fees to upsize the impacted sewer pipelines at Jefferson Avenue, via Montezuma and Del Rio need to increase the capacity of the Temecula Valley Road. RWRF to handle an additional 0.8 mgd of wastewater Mitigation Measure MM-UTL-1b: Prior to issuance of construction permits for a project -specific development flow; the construction of which could result in significant within the Project area, the project applicant shall pay Eastern Municipal Water District's then in effect Financial environmental effects. Participation Charge associated with obtaining sewer service. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 19 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Proposed Project The City of Temecula is processing a City -initiated Specific Plan Amendment (LR17-0724) for Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area in Temecula. The proposed amendment to the existing Specific Plan would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed clarification amendments to the Uptown Specific Plan include various typo corrections as well as, clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non -conforming uses, and the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law. No construction activities are proposed as part of the recommendation; the minor amendments only clarify standards for future development projects. Comparison of Approved and Proposed Project For the purposes of this Addendum, the Approved Project is used as a baseline for the analysis. As described above, full implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would increase the density and intensity of existing Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area of Temecula. The new development is assumed to replace all existing development in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, which currently totals approximately 3,800,00 square feet. The Project development scenario would yield approximately 1.7 million square feet of commercial development, 3,726 dwelling units, and 315 hotel rooms, of development at buildout. over a 20-year time period. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan replaced the seven existing zoning designations (Community Commercial, Service Commercial, Highway Tourist Commercial, Business Park, Industrial Park, Public Institutional, and Open Space Conservation) with new use and development regulations and standards for the Specific Plan area. As described above, the proposed amendment to the existing Specific Plan would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The Project area is approximately 2.3 miles long and encompasses approximately 560 acres located in the northwestern area of Temecula, bounded by Cherry Street on the north, I-15 on the east, Rancho California Road on the south, and Diaz Road on the west (Figure 1). The Project area is characterized by an eclectic mix of automobile -oriented strip commercial/retail, office, and light industrial development (Figure 2). The total existing building area is approximately 3,800,000 square feet. Typical uses in the Project area include religious facilities, government facilities, office uses, general retail, service commercial, automobile -oriented uses, restaurants (drive-thru and sit down), industrial uses, and hotels. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 20 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Figure 1 Project Location Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 21 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Figure 2 Existing Conditions Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 22 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum 10. Required Approvals The following approvals are required as a part of this project: • Specific Plan Amendment to amend: • Update the Specific plan to clarify language in the Specific Plan • Amendment to the Specific Plan to create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The City of Temecula is the lead agency and the approvals of other public agencies are not required. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 23 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Environmental Checklist This section addresses each of the environmental issues discussed in the Certified PEIR and subsequent CEQA documents to determine if the currently proposed Project has the potential to create new significant impacts or a result in a substantial increase in the severity of a significant impact as compared to what was identified in the Certified PEIR and subsequent CEQA documents. Additionally, impacts are compared to existing on -the -ground conditions. As described above, the approved Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and Certified PEIR are also referred to as the "Approved Project." Topics that were scoped out in the Certified PEIR's Initial Study, hereby referred to simply as Certified PEIR, are included in this analysis. I. Aesthetics Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): 1. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Discussion a) Scenic Vista Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not Identified in identified in the certified the "Approved Project' Specific Plan PER ❑ ❑X ❑ ❑X ❑ ❑X ❑ ❑X The Certified PEIR determined that the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in a less - than -significant impact or no impact to scenic vista. The proposed Project would be within the density parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not plan for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. The proposed Project merely amends the existing Specific Plan and would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to scenic vista that was not previously considered. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 24 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum b) Scenic Resources The Certified PEIR determined that the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in less - than -significant impact or no impact to scenic resources. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to scenic resources that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures. c) Visual Character The Certified PEIR determined that the visual character of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area would be altered through the encouragement of higher density/intensity development that would reduce setbacks, place buildings closer to the roadways, incorporate "complete streets" concepts and other related improvements in order to increase the vibrancy of the area and encourage pedestrian activity. In addition, there would be an adoption of a form -based code that would define development regulations, including building disposition on a lot, building height, building massing, parking and development density and intensity, to better facilitate urban design and a pedestrian -friendly environment. Design standards contained in the Specific Plan provides architectural guidelines, setbacks, sidewalk widths, signage standards, a streetscape and landscaping plan, and lighting standards in order to create a cohesive and well -recognizable character for the area. Therefore, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan aims to enhance rather than degrade the visual character of the area and impacts would be less than significant. The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to visual character that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures. d) Light and Glare The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is largely built out and, therefore, includes existing sources of light and glare. The nighttime lighting environment surrounding the site mainly consists of passing vehicle headlights, street lighting, lighting of the I-15 corridor, and building lighting from commercial and industrial uses. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 25 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Surface parking lots currently within the specific plan area are the only substantial source of glare from sunlight or artificial light reflecting from cars. These lots include one large surface parking lot on Bueking Drive, located behind the Foundation for Course in Miracles Education Center; one along Via Montezuma, east of Best for Less Tires in the auto -oriented use area; a large parking area associated with Winchester Square; and two large parking surface lots located on Calle Cortez and Del Rio Road for the Old Adobe Plaza Shopping Center. The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to light and glare that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures. II. Air Quality Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not Identified in identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): the "Approved Project' Specific Plan PEIR 3. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the Project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable El 0 air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially El 0 to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any El 0 criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant El concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Discussion As discussed in Certified PEIR Section 3.2, Air Quality, buildout of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area was determined to result in significant and unavoidable impacts with regard to construction and operational emissions. The Certified PEIR determined that the construction pursuant to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and resulting emissions would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regional significance thresholds for, nitrogen oxides (NOx) and reactive organic gas (ROG). However, even with compliance with applicable Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 26 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum SCAQMD rules and mitigation measures specified in the Certified PEIR, emissions would still exceed SCAQMD's applicable significance thresholds. Therefore, the Certified PEIR found impacts from construction pursuant to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would be significant and unavoidable. The Certified PEIR found that implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in significant and unavoidable long-term operational impacts from operational emissions due to increased vehicle trips and associated emissions. However, during operation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, traffic generated as the result of full buildout is not predicted to result in the formation of localized CO hotspots at impacted roadway intersections. With respect to toxic air contaminants (TACs), the land uses analyzed in the Certified PEIR could potential expose receptors to TACs from mobile sources on I-15 to an extent that health risks could result. As the existing auto -oriented retail and light industrial facilities generally emit greater amounts of TACs than residential, office, hotel, or commercial uses, the removal of these uses would result in a reduction in the amount of existing TAC emissions in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. Mitigation measures such as relocating the residential development beyond 500 feet of the freeway would reduce concentrations of TAC that sensitive receptors would be exposed to. Odors from construction pursuant to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan were found to be less than significant. During the construction phases for each of the new developments that would occur in the Project area over the course of the buildout period, exhaust from equipment and activities associated with the application of architectural coatings and other interior and exterior finishes may produce discernible odors typical of most construction sites. Such odors would be a temporary source of nuisance to adjacent uses, but because they are temporary and intermittent in nature, would not be considered a significant environmental impact. Therefore, impacts associated with objectionable odors would be less than significant. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan was determined to be consistent with the applicable air quality plan because it would not increase the allowable density in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area from densities allowed under the General Plan. The Certified PEIR determined that the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is consistent with the growth assumptions contained in the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), which is the air quality plan for the region. a) Air Quality Plans The 2012 Air Quality Management Plan was applicable to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan at the time of the analysis. Since then, the 2016 AQMP has been released. Projects that are consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by SCAG are considered to be consistent with the AQMP growth projections, since the forecast assumptions by SCAG forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP. Additionally, because SCAG's regional growth forecasts are based upon, among other things, land uses designated in general plans, a project that is consistent with the land use designated in a general plan would also be consistent with the SCAG's regional forecast projections, and thus, also with the AQMP growth projections. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 27 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum No additional construction activities are anticipated for Specific Plan Amendment project, therefore there will be no additional environmental impacts to air quality than anticipated under the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. b) Air Quality Standards The Certified PEIR did not perform quantitative emissions calculations for the construction emissions from individual implementation of projects within the entire Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, but conservatively assumed 5.7 percent of buildout of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan per year. These emissions could exceed SCAQMD significance thresholds even with implementation of mitigation, resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact. No additional construction activities are anticipated for the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, therefore there will be no additional environmental impacts to air quality. CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be significant and unavoidable as there are no other feasible mitigation measures available to reduce these impacts at this program level. c) Cumulative The SCAQMD's project -specific and cumulative significance thresholds are the same, and projects that exceed the project -specific significance thresholds are considered to be cumulatively considerable. Projects that do not exceed the project -specific thresholds are not considered to be cumulatively significant. As discussed above, no additional construction activities are anticipated for the proposed Project, therefore there will be no additional environmental impacts to air quality. CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR. d) Sensitive Receptors No additional construction activities are anticipated for the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, therefore there will be no additional environmental impacts to sensitive receptors. CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 28 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum e) Odors The Project would not introduce any new sources of odors not previously considered and analyzed in the Certified PEIR. Therefore, the Specific Plan Amendment would not result in any new significant odor impacts nor would it result in a substantial increase in the severity of impacts compared to those identified in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. III. Biological Resources Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not Identified in identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): the "Approved Project' Specific Plan PEIR 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through ❑ ❑X habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or ❑ 0 other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected ❑ 0 wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ❑ FZ resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting ❑ FZ biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ FZ Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Discussion Topography within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is generally flat with elevations ranging from 304 to 335 meters (1,000 to 1,100 feet) above mean sea level. The majority of the Project is developed; however, the area also includes large open space/conservation parcels that are owned by the Riverside County Flood Control District. These parcels total approximately 240 acres and represent the largest land use within the Project. These parcels are comprised of disturbed/ruderal vegetation near the northwestern end to wetlands and riparian/riverine resources within Murrieta Creek, along the western edge of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. Both Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 29 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum natural drainages and artificial stormwater management channels direct on -site generated stormwater from the adjacent developments and open vacant lots into Murrieta Creek. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area supports a variety of vegetation communities including meadows and marshes, riparian scrub/woodland/forest, and disturbed/open vacant land that may provide habitat for a variety of common wildlife species. Based on previous experience within the region, general wildlife species expected to occur on or within the vicinity of the Project include, but are not limited to: Anna's hummingbird (Calypte arena), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), bushtit (Psaltriparus minimus), California thrasher (Toxostoma redivivum), California towhee (Melozone crissalis), California quail (Callipepla californica), Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii), lesser goldfinch (Spinus psaltria), acorn woodpecker (Melanerpes formicivorus), red- tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus), spotted towhee (Pipilo maculatus), turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus), wren (Thryomanes sp.), coyote (Canis latrans), bobcat (Lynx rufus), and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Plant communities, identified below, are defined according to the MSHCP Collapsed Vegetation Communities Classifications, and are based on the Riverside County Land Information System 2005 plant community/vegetation data. This information represents the best currently available information for a program -level analysis. Table 3 from the PEIR shows the vegetation community acreages for the Project site. As specific projects are proposed, on -site habitat surveys should be conducted for a more accurate depiction of habitat type. The total acreage listed in Table 3 for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is higher than the 560 acres defined in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, due to the fact that the vegetation communities map is based on the total land area falling within the overall Uptown Temecula Specific Plan boundary, while the 560 acres listed in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan description is based on parcel data and excludes streets, easements, and other such areas that are not included in parcel data; thus, the acreage upon which the vegetation communities map is based is higher. TABLE 3 2005 COUNTY VEGETATION COMMUNITY ACREAGES WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE Vegetation Community Acres Developed 351.6 Disturbed/Ruderal 176.1 Meadows and Marshes 74.9 Open Water/Reservoir/Pond 10.9 Riparian Scrub/Woodland/Forest 8.5 Grand Total 622.0 A total of 26 species of plants were recorded within a one -mile radius of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area in the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and within the United States Geological Survey Murrieta 7.5-minute quadrangle in the CNPS, and were evaluated for potential occurrence based on elevations and the type and quality of soils and habitats present Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 30 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. Environmental conditions within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area are considered suitable for 21 species of plants considered to have a moderate or high potential to occur on -site. Potential impacts to the special -status plants identified would include trampling, crushing, grubbing, trimming or completely removing the plants or their habitat during construction. Also, construction equipment could introduce invasive weeds that could out -compete special status plants. Impacts to special status plants are considered significant. A total of 27 special -status wildlife species were recorded in the CNDD13 and evaluated for potential occurrence within a one -mile radius of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Specific area based on the type and quality of habitat mapped by the County in 2005 and aerial photographs. Additional species not identified by the CNDD13 but are known to occur within the vicinity of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Specific area based on previous experience in the City of Temecula and the surrounding region were also added identified. Environmental conditions within the Project area are considered suitable for 24 species of wildlife considered to have a moderate or high potential to occur on -site. To mitigate potentially significant impacts to special -status plants and wildlife, mitigation measures were recommended in the PEIR. Prior to any ground -disturbing activities for individual development projects, pre -construction clearance surveys shall be conducted in accordance with Section 6.0 of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for special -status plant species in suitable habitat areas that will be subject to ground -disturbing activities. The surveys will be conducted in the appropriate season. All special -status plant species observed shall be marked and afforded a level of protection within 100 feet of the construction footprint, per the terms and conditions of the MSHCP. As appropriate, the special -status or habitats of concern mapping within the construction limits shall be updated. A biologist will provide verification and report through memorandum to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Monitoring Program Administrator. Future development within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Specific area would result in a potential direct, indirect, temporary, and permanent impact to biological resources. However, as development occurs, mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce impacts to less than significant. a-0 Biological Resources The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not result in additional construction activities than envisioned under the Certified PEIR. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 31 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum IV. Cultural Resources Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project" Specific Plan PEIR 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES —Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ❑ ❑X a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ❑ 0 an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ❑ 0 resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ 0 outside of formal cemeteries? Discussion The western portion of the Project area is bounded by Murrieta Creek, and the northern portion is bisected by Santa Gertrudis Creek, making the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area well suited to human habitation and use. The geoarchaeological review prepared for the Certified PEIR, indicated that portions of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area have a high to moderate probability for buried archaeological resources. This is also evidenced by the high number of prehistoric archaeological resources, some with buried deposits, recorded within and near the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Specific area. Previously recorded resources CA-RN-717, a prehistoric artifact scatter, and CA-RIV-644, a prehistoric temporary -use campsite with deep midden deposits, are located within the Project area (Schlanger, 1974). Additionally, prehistoric site CA-RIV-237, a possible village site with midden soil, is located west of Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area on the opposite bank of Murrieta Creek (Drover and Smith, 1991). Pechanga cultural resources specialists have indicated that they believe that CA-RIV-237 is part of the village of Qengva, and that the village may have encompassed the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. Based on the historic aerial and map review, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area has likely been used for agricultural purposes for over 100 years, and manifestations of those activities in the form of historic -period archaeological deposits may be present, possibly including those associated with the Gonzalez Adobe, which was constructed in 1879. Given the number and type of archaeological resources in the vicinity of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, as well as the presence of Murrieta and Santa Gertrudis creeks and other natural water sources, and the area's long period of historic use, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area should be considered highly sensitive for the presence of archaeological resources. The Temecula General Plan Open Space Element calls for the City to work to preserve or salvage potential archeological resources on sites proposed for future development through the development review and mitigation monitoring processes, as well as maintain an inventory of areas with archaeological sensitivity and historic sites. Given the high archaeological sensitivity of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, previously unknown and unrecorded archaeological resources may be unearthed during excavation and grading activities for individual projects. This can occur even in already developed areas, as older buildings are known to have often been built Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 32 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum on top of or within archaeological deposits. Although much of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is already heavily developed, the potentially significant buried archaeological resources could nevertheless still exist within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, beneath and between structures and roads. If previously undiscovered artifacts or remains are uncovered during excavation or construction, significant impacts could occur. In addition, future development under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Specific could significantly impact sites of traditional cultural value to tribes. Representatives of the Pechanga Tribe indicate the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is sensitive for cultural resources, that the Project area is within an area traditionally inhabited by the Pechanga Tribe, and that several tribal named places, including the village of Qengva, existed within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. The Pechanga Tribe considers the Temecula area, including the Project area, to be part of a cultural landscape. Archaeological sites identified as a result of future development within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area could potentially contribute to the significance of this landscape or to other sites of traditional cultural value to tribes. Moreover, development within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area could include the construction of buildings up to eight stories in height, which could visually infringe on a cultural landscape. Potential impacts to Tribal resources, including the surrounding landscape, should be considered. Given the above, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan has the potential to adversely affect archaeological resources. Implementation of mitigation measures listed in Table 1 would reduce these impacts to less than significant. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is underlain by the Pauba Formation and Quaternary Alluvium (McLeod, 2013). Although shallow deposits of the Quaternary Alluvium, which occur throughout much of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, are not likely to contain significant vertebrate fossils, deeper deposits in the alluvium may very well contain non-renewable paleontological resources. Moreover, the Pauba Formation localities located in the northeastern portion of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area may contain significant non-renewable paleontological resources. The paleontological records search indicated that fossil localities have been documented in the vicinity of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area in Quaternary Alluvium and Pauba Formation sediments similar to those that occur within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. Temecula's General Plan (Implementation Program OS-26) requires that a paleontologist be retained to observe grading activities in areas where the probable presence of paleontological resources is identified. However, significant paleontological resources can be uncovered even in areas of low sensitivity, and it is possible that ground - disturbing construction activities associated with implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan could result in the inadvertent discovery of paleontological resources, which could be a significant impact. Implementation of mitigation measures would reduce these impacts to less than significant levels at this program -level of analysis. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 33 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum a-d) Cultural Resources The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to cultural resources that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. V. Geology and Soils Seismicity Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project" Specific Plan PEIR 6. GEOLOGY and Soils — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated ❑ ❑X on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑X iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ 0 iv) Landslides? ❑ 0 b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ❑ 0 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that ❑ 0 would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of 0 the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of 0 septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 34 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Discussion a.i-iv) Seismically Induced Ground Shaking The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is located in a seismically active region with an active fault segment, the Wildomar segment of the Elsinore fault, intersecting the site, and another, the Willard fault segment, within 1,500 feet of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area boundary. In 2007, estimates by the Working Group on Earthquake Probabilities indicated a 97 percent chance that a magnitude 6.7 or greater earthquake would occur in the southern California region over the following 30 years (USGS, 2008). The Elsinore Fault Zone is one of the faults considered capable of producing significant groundshaking. If not designed appropriately, a 6.7 or greater magnitude earthquake on the Elsinore or one of the other regional active faults could produce significant groundshaking within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, causing damage to structures. Furthermore, the Uptown Temecula Specific area is essentially relatively level with very little topographical relief and generally not susceptible to landslides with the exception of the creek banks. The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Therefore, there will be no additional environmental impacts to geology, soils and seismicity. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. b) Soil Erosion Construction activities associated with future development of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan could disturb soils that are protected by vegetation or expose soils covered by asphalt or concrete, resulting in soil erosion and loss of topsoil. Implementation of mitigation measures MM-HYD-la and MM-HYD-Ib would reduce impacts to less than significant. The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 35 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would not be significant. c) Liquefaction The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Specific Plan area is a Seismic Hazard Zone for liquefaction due to historic occurrences, the presence of unfavorable soils and shallow groundwater (CGS, 2007). Liquefaction at the site could result in loss of bearing pressure, lateral spreading, sand boils (liquefied soil exiting at the ground surface), and earthquake -induced settlement. Future earthquakes could potentially produce damaging effects at the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, if proposed improvements are not adequately designed. Due to the location of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan in an area of high liquefaction potential, people could be harmed and structures may be damaged from earthquake -induced liquefaction, rapid settlement or other earthquake -induced ground failures. Because the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is in a liquefaction hazard zone, pursuant to the Seismic Hazards Mapping Act of 1990, a geotechnical report must be prepared that evaluates and provides mitigation for potential liquefaction hazards. The investigation and mitigation recommendations must be made in accordance with the California Geological Survey, Special Publication 117A, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards. Adherence to these requirements, which would include incorporation of industry standard measures of minimizing the potential for liquefaction through foundation design, treatment of site soils and/or replacement of liquefiable soils with engineered fills, would ensure that seismically induced ground failure is a less than significant impact to proposed development. The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of-way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 36 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum d) Expansive or Unstable Soils The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is relatively level with very little topographical relief and generally not susceptible to landslides with the exception of the creek banks. Development of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would be required to adhere to City building code requirements, which include the preparation of a geotechnical investigation by a state licensed geotechnical engineer. The required geotechnical report for any new development or redevelopment would determine the susceptibility of the subject site to settlement and prescribe appropriate engineering techniques for reducing its effects. Where settlement and/or differential settlement is predicted, site preparation measures —such as use of engineered fill, surcharging, wick drains, deep foundations, structural slabs, hinged slabs, flexible utility connections, and utility hangers —could be used. These measures would be evaluated and the most effective, feasible, and economical measures recommended in a geotechnical report and incorporated into site design in accordance with building code requirements. Engineering recommendations included in the Project engineering and design plans would be reviewed and approved by the City. Therefore, with adherence to building code requirements the potential for unstable soils to adversely affect proposed improvements would be reduced to less than significant levels. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. e) Wastewater Disposal Development associated with the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would deliver wastewater to the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) wastewater treatment plant in Temecula. Therefore, this issue is not applicable to the Project. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 37 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum VI. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project" Specific Plan PER 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS — Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or ❑ ❑X indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation ❑ FA adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Discussion The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would generate GHG emissions from a variety of sources. First, GHG emissions would be generated during construction of each of the project -specific developments under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Once each individual development is fully operational, the operations of those developments would generate GHG emissions from both area sources and mobile sources. Indirect source emissions that would be generated from operation of all the proposed developments in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area would also include electrical consumption, water and wastewater usage (transportation), and solid waste disposal. Mobile (direct) sources of air pollutants associated with the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would consist of motor vehicles trips generated by residents, employees, and visitors. As discussed previously, it was conservatively assumed in the air quality analysis that under a worst -case construction scenario approximately 5.7 percent of the total maximum development scenario would be constructed within any given year prior to Uptown Temecula Specific Plan buildout. For the purpose of determining the total construction GHG emissions that would be generated by full buildout of the Specific Plan area, the GHG emissions that would be generated under the worst -case construction scenario used in the air quality analysis were taken and proportionately extrapolated out to full (100 percent) development of the proposed land uses. TABLE 5 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION- AND OPERATIONS -RELATED GHG EMISSIONS FOR THE PROJECT Project Emissions CO2e Emission Source (MT/yr) Project Construction Total 16,480 Construction (Amortized over 30 years) 549 Project OperationS,,b Mobile Sources 58,616 Electricity Consumption 16,694 Natural Gas Consumption 7,918 Water Consumption 4,463 Solid Waste 1,881 Area Source 1,184 Total (Project Construction and Operations)° 91,305 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 38 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Project Emissions CO2e Emission Source (MT/yr) Existing Use Operations (To Be Removed)',' Mobile Sources 49,785 Electricity Consumption 17,950 Natural Gas Consumption 6,864 Water Consumption 3,094 Solid Waste 1,672 Area Source 0.10 Total (Existing Uses) 79,365 TOTAL PROJECT NET EMISSIONS 11,940 NOTES: CO2e= carbon dioxide equivalent; MT/yr = metric tons per year; see Appendix B for CalEEMod model outputs. a For the purpose of assessing the project's GHG emissions against the SCAQMD's recommended GHG efficiency threshold, which was developed based on a target date of 2020 in accordance with the requirements of AB 32, the Project's total operational emissions at full buildout were assumed to occur in 2020 even though the Project's buildout horizon extends beyond 2020. b For the purposes of conducting a conservative analysis, the Project's GHG operational emissions did not account for any emissions reductions resulting from the required compliance with the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code requirements. ` The project's total annual GHG emissions presented includes the annual operational emissions and the annual construction emissions that have been amortized over 30 years per SCAQMD methodology. The operational GHG emissions estimated for the existing developments in the Project area are for year 2020, which is the target date for the requirements of AB 32. e A future baseline for the GHG emissions associated with the existing uses is used in this analysis to provide an accurate comparison of the net difference in emissions between the Project and existing uses. When the GHG emissions associated with the existing uses at this future baseline is compared to the 2013 baseline emissions), the only change is a reduction in mobile source emissions. Given that mobile source emissions in California are expected to continually improve over time due to vehicle fleet turnover and the implementation of more advanced vehicle technologies, including lower emission fuels, it is reasonable to assume that future emissions in the Project area occurring without the Project would still experience a net decrease in mobile source GHG emissions. Doing so would prevent the overstating of the Project's net reduction in operational GHG emissions in the Project area. Thus, for these reasons, it is reasonable for the purpose of this analysis to use a future baseline for the GHG emissions generated by the existing uses. It should be further noted that starting in 2016, the updated Title 24 building requirements requires further reductions in energy consumption emissions by the residential and nonresidential developments associated with the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The Certified PEIR analyzed the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan under compliance with the Title 24 building requirements. Thus, once the energy reductions from compliance with the 2014Title 24 building requirements are accounted for, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan `s net annual GHG emissions increase over the existing uses in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area would be less than the estimated 11,940 MTCO2e per year. Furthermore, as building standards would continue to be updated periodically over time (2016 Title 24 building requirements), the energy efficiencies of new residential and nonresidential buildings in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area would continue to improve as well over time. Thus, GHG emissions generated by the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would be less than significant. As discussed in the impact analysis above, the GHG emissions generated by the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would not exceed the GHG efficiency threshold. Consequently, the implementation of the Project would not hinder the state's ability to achieve AB 32's goal of achieving 1990 levels of GHG emissions by 2020. Furthermore, emissions from vehicles, which are the main source of operational GHG emissions associated with the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, would also be reduced through implementation of the state Pavley standards, the federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, and the state LCFS. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 39 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would also allow for more mixed -use developments in a walkable, pedestrian -oriented environment through building placement, streetscape design, and a strong focus on the public realm when compared with the existing land uses in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan aims to establish an efficient and interconnected multi -modal mobility network through circulation and transit improvements, and enhance bicycle and pedestrian mobility in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area through the development of human -scaled streets, blocks, and alleys as well as incorporating public plazas and providing links with open spaces and recreational amenities. a) Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. b) Applicable Plans, Policies, or Regulations The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 40 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project" Specific Plan PEIR 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment ❑ ❑X through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment ❑ ❑X through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely ❑ ❑X hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ ❑X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ❑ adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Discussion As described in the Certified PEIR, construction activities would require the use of certain hazardous materials such as fuels, oils, solvents, and glues. Inadvertent release of large quantities of these materials into the environment could adversely impact soil, surface waters, or groundwater quality. However, the onsite storage and/or use of large quantities of materials capable of impacting soil and groundwater are not typically required for the anticipated individual projects that would occur under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. In addition, for any sites that would disturb more than one acre, a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for General Construction would be required which include measures that cover the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials during construction. With adherence to these existing regulations, the potential impact associated with routine transportation, use, and disposal of hazardous materials would be less than significant. Demolition of any existing structures, especially older structures where hazardous building materials such as asbestos, lead -based paint, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were commonly used in construction, could be released during demolition activities and expose Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 41 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum construction workers, the public, or the environment. The level of potential impact is dependent upon the age, construction, and building materials in each building and the protocols employed for demolition. However, there are established measures that certified contractors commonly use to contain, store, and dispose of these hazardous materials in a manner that limits exposure. The first step towards appropriate handling and demolition is conducting thorough surveys to identify the presence of these materials. ACMs are regulated both as a hazardous air pollutant under the Clean Air Act and as a potential worker safety hazard under the authority of Cal -OSHA. Cal - OSHA also regulates worker exposure to lead -based paint. Potential exposure to these hazardous building materials can be reduced through appropriate use of personal protective equipment, isolation and containment of work areas, and placement of waste in approved transport containers. Proposed development facilitated under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would be expected to increase commercial and residential land uses and could involve a range of increased chemical products that are considered hazardous materials or hazardous waste. Exposure to hazardous chemicals through improper handling or through accidental upset conditions could cause acute or chronic health effects to the public and environment. Handling and use of these hazardous materials and the disposal of the resulting hazardous wastes would be required to follow the applicable laws and regulations. The net result of compliance would be the reduction of risks and hazards to workers, the public, and the environment to levels that would be considered acceptable. Hazardous materials would typically be stored in their original containers prior to use. As required, the hazardous materials would be stored in each building, in locations according to compatibility and in storage enclosures (i.e., flammable material storage cabinets and biological safety cabinets) or in areas or rooms specially designed, protected, and contained for such storage, in accordance with applicable regulations. Hazardous materials would be handled and used in accordance with applicable regulations by personnel that have been trained in the handling and use of the material and that have received proper hazard -communication training. Hazardous materials reporting (i.e., California Hazardous Materials Business Planning, California Proposition 65 notification, and Emergency Planning and Community -Right -to -Know Act reporting) would be completed as required. Temporary construction activities associated with development under the proposed Project may involve limited quantities of gasoline, diesel fuel, hydraulic fluid, solvents, oils, and paints for the construction of individual, projects within the plan area. These materials would be transported along the roadways and temporarily stored onsite. Containment and spill cleanup is encompassed in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) discussed in Section 4.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, to prevent hazardous materials from spreading off the property. Hazardous materials being generated during construction would be disposed of as described in the required Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Therefore, as a condition of construction, compliance with existing regulations (NPDES) would address potential upsets and accidents limiting the potential impacts during construction to less than significant. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 42 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum As stated in the Certified PEIR, a number of sites within the plan area have been impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons from leaking underground storage tanks or other chemical constituents such as solvents associated with dry cleaning operations that could expose individuals to hazardous conditions resulting from exposure of contaminated soils or groundwater. Exposure of residents to underground hazardous wastes is considered a potentially significant impact. Areas impacted by former releases could expose construction workers or future residents to hazardous materials or hazardous wastes. Some of the sites listed have been closed indicating that there is no longer any contamination at levels that could adversely affect human health or the environment. Investigations and remediation efforts are generally required by overseeing agencies such as the County's Hazardous Materials Program, Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC), which establish cleanup levels according to existing or proposed uses. In general, soils contaminated from releases of petroleum hydrocarbons associated with Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) are found in limited areas around the origin of release and do not migrate very far offsite. Groundwater contamination, depending on a number of factors can migrate further. Solvents are generally very soluble in water and can be found to migrate well offsite. The former Dutch Dry Cleaners has been documented with releases of solvents that have been found in the underlying groundwater. In addition to the documented cases, there may be other sites where previously unidentified contamination is encountered. Implementation of the defined mitigation measures would reduce the potential impact related to sites with past releases of hazardous materials to less than significant levels. a—h) Hazards and Hazardous Materials The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would not be significant. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 43 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project" Specific Plan PEIR 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ❑ N requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ❑ N substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ N or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ N or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the ❑ capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ❑ mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that ❑ would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ N injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? N Discussion Of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area's 560 acres, approximately 240 acres are zoned open space, which are mostly pervious surfaces. The remaining acres are zoned for commercial and industrial uses; total existing building area in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is approximately 3,800,000 square feet. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area overlies the Temecula Valley Groundwater Basin, which has a surface area of about 137 square miles. The basin is bounded by nonwater-bearing crystalline rocks of the Penninsular Ranges. Natural recharge of the basin's water -bearing alluvium is from direct precipitation and percolation in the Warm Springs, Tucalota, Santa Gertrudis, Murrieta, and Pechanga Creeks and the Temecula River. Groundwater flows to the southwestern part of the basin. Groundwater is generally unconfined, excluding beneath the Pauba Valley and near some faults that cut the basin. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 44 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum Murrieta Creek and Santa Gertrudis Creek are both listed as impaired on the State of California's 2010 list of impaired water bodies pursuant to provisions of Clean Water Act Section 303(d). Murrieta Creek is impaired by metals/metalloids, nutrients, pesticides and toxicity. Santa Gertrudis Creek is impaired by metals/metalloids, nutrients, pathogens, and pesticides. Buildout of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would require demolition of existing structures, pavement breaking, ditching, and excavation; these activities could expose and loosen building materials and sediment, which has the potential to mix with storm water runoff and degrade surface water quality. Furthermore, construction would require the use of heavy equipment and construction -related chemicals, such as concrete, cement, asphalt, fuels, oils, antifreeze, transmission fluid, grease, solvents and paints. These potentially harmful materials could be accidentally spilled or improperly disposed of during construction and could wash into and pollute surface waters or groundwater, which would result in a significant impact to water quality. Furthermore, implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would include both commercial and residential structures. The introduction of residential uses to an area previously containing only commercial and open space uses would introduce the potential for new or additional pollutants to be generated in the area (e.g., pathogens, nutrients, pesticides, sediment, trash and debris, oxygen demanding substances, oil and grease). The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would also increase the amount of commercial development in the area, thus increasing the amount of commercial -related pollutants (organic compounds) potentially generated. Chemicals used during the operation of the new commercial and residential structures could potentially discharge into surface waters either directly or during storm water runoff events, resulting in degradation of surface water quality. Implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Certified PIER would ensure that construction -related and operation -related impacts on water quality would be less than significant. A portion of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area adjacent to Murrieta Creek containing both open space and commercial uses would be located in the 100-year flood zone. No structural development would occur in the open space area. However, existing commercial development would be subject to redevelopment and possibly higher density commercial or residential development. Thus, the Project would introduce housing or structures into a flood zone area that could potentially impede or redirect flood flows. However, specific building standards, as described within the flood damage prevention and floodplain management regulations of the City Development Code (Chapter 15.12 Floodplain Management) apply. In all areas of special flood hazards, all new construction and substantial improvements are required to comply with the Title 24 and follow standards identified for anchoring, use of flood -resistant building materials, use of adequate drainage paths, and elevating the structures to or above the base flood elevation. The City would also review development plans for future projects within the floodplain, to ensure compliance with City and FEMA floodplain development requirements. Furthermore, the City participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which makes flood insurance available to affected property owners within the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, impacts related to flooding are expected to be less than significant. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 45 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would not expose people to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving inundation by a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow because the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is not located immediately near a coast or large body of water, nor does it have steep slopes. The closest large body of water to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan capable of causing a seiche is Lake Skinner Dam, located 6.4 miles away. The Specific Plan area is located approximately 28 miles from the Pacific Ocean, which is a large enough distance to avoid tsunami impacts. Additionally, due to the gently rolling hills located adjacent to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area, mudflows would not likely reach the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the Project. Therefore, this impact threshold was not studied further. a j) Hydrology and Water Quality The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. IX. Land Use and Planning Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not Identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project" Specific Plan PEIR 10. LAND USE AND LAND USE PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ 0 regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ❑ 0 natural community conservation plan? Discussion a) Community As discussed in the Certified PEIR, Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would facilitate the development of a more cohesive community and, therefore, would not physically divide an established community. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 46 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to community division that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. b) Consistency with Land Use Plans As discussed in the Certified PEIR, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is consistent with Southern California Association of Government (SLAG) policies from SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and the 2008 Regional Transportation Plan. Furthermore, land uses for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan was derived primarily from the City's existing uses and revised to reflect the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan's goals and guiding principles. As such, the land uses are generally compatible with existing uses in the area but would allow for more mixed -use in a walkable, pedestrian oriented environment through building placement, streetscape design, and a strong focus on the public realm through the Mixed Use Overlay. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan intends to facilitate in -fill development, public and private reinvestment in the area, and guide overall future revitalization of the area. Implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan requires a General Plan Amendment. modifying the City's existing General Plan Land Use Policy Map and sections in the Land Use Element to accommodate mixed -use areas that encourage live/work arrangements, and mixtures of compatible, pedestrian -oriented retail, office, public facilities, open space, and housing at activity nodes through urban design standards and regulations. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan does not conflict with the existing General Plan because the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is consistent with goals and policies of the General Plan that aim to conserve natural resources and those that consider development compatibility. The proposed Project proposes new streets be added to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan in order to create a grid pattern street network with smaller blocks and increased connectivity creating more pedestrian friendly and walkable neighborhoods and improved mobility throughout the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area. The location of new streets is proposed as a hypothetical street network to allow for flexibility in their location as development occurs. The hypothetical street network will be constructed as new development occurs where new block size standards are exceeded. The highest priority new streets are those that help complete overall connectivity within the District for example by resolving existing cul-de-sacs (as within the Sports District), creating strong Neighborhood connector streets (as at Commerce Center Drive) and completing connections to the community from west to east (as at Overland Drive). Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 47 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to hazards and hazardous materials that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. c) Habitat Conservation The Certified PEIR determined that the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in less -than - significant impact or no impact to habitat conservation. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to habitat conservation that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would not be significant. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 48 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum X. Noise Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not Identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project' Specific Plan PEIR 12. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of, noise levels in ❑ ❑X excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ ❑X groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ❑ ❑X in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ ❑X noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project located in the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Discussion As discussed in Certified PEIR, implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan could expose nearby sensitive receptors to noise and vibration levels that would result in potentially significant impact. Mitigation measures proposed in the Certified PEIR would reduce construction noise levels to less -than -significant. Vibration impacts due to construction would be minimized by use of administrative controls (such as scheduling construction activities with the highest potential to produce susceptible vibration to hours with least potential to affect nearby properties), and would result in a less -than -significant impact. However, pile -driving and other substantial impact equipment (e.g., jackhammers) during construction would result in a significant and unavoidable impact (however, the proposed Project would not use pile -driving or other substantial impact equipment). Noise from increased traffic and stationary sources from the implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would increase noise levels by a maximum of 0.8 dBA (Ld„) over future traffic noise and would be less -than -significant. Vibration impacts with respect to operation would result in a less -than -significant impact. a-0 Noise The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 49 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would not be significant. XI. Population and Housing Potentially Significant Same or less impact than impact Not Identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project' Specific Plan PEIR 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING —Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ❑ ❑X directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ 0 necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ❑ 0 construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Discussion a) Population Growth As discussed in the Certified PEIR, the addition of 3,726 new residential dwelling units would generate a net population increase of approximately 10,805 residents. However, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would introduce mostly multi -family housing, which typically does not have as large a household size as single-family housing; therefore, the addition of 10,805 new residents represents a conservative estimate for population generated by the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Based on this number, the development of the proposed residential uses would constitute approximately 68 percent of the population growth expected in the City between 2012 and 2035. Thus, the population associated with the proposed residential uses would be within the anticipated population growth for the city and would not exceed the projections on which the City has based plans related to provision of public services, utilities, and other amenities to maintain the current quality of life it provides its residents. In addition, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would generate new employment populations in the area, mostly in the retail, professional/business services, educational/health services, finance, and leisure/hospitality sectors (KMA, 2012). However, the new retail, hotel, and office space that would be developed under the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would be accommodating demand for this type of commercial space that is projected to occur in the city and surrounding area (KMA, 2012). Because most office and retail employees can be drawn from within a region's existing employment stock, it is not expected that new office and retail space would draw large numbers of new employees from outside of the region; and therefore would not result in a new population of employees that would result in growth inducement beyond that already projected for the City. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 50 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be significant and unavoidable. b, c) Household Displacement There are no existing residential units or homes located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area; therefore, no displacement of existing housing would occur. In addition, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would encourage mixed -use and residential projects and would result in additional housing opportunities. Therefore, there are no impacts related to these two threshold criteria. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact than "Approved Project." The proposed Project would result in less impacts than those identified in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 51 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum XII. Public Services Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not Identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project' Specific Plan PEIR 14. PUBLIC SERVICES —Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: i) Fire protection? ❑FA ii) Police protection? ❑FA iii) Schools? ❑ FA iv) Parks? ❑ FA v) Other public facilities? ❑ FA Discussion a.i) Fire Protection As discussed in the Certified PEIR, new development from the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan could include a total of 3,726 new dwelling units within the plan area, which would result in a maximum of approximately 10,805 new residents in the Project area over the next 20 years. The new development and population would increase the demand for fire protection services, including emergency medical response, and could result in the need for additional personnel or fire protection facilities. Project -level conformance with City goals, policies and performance standards and payment of fees as required by the Municipal Code would reduce or avoid program -level impacts related to fire protection services to below a level of significance. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. a.ii) Police Protection As discussed in the Certified PEIR, police protection services would be provided by the Temecula Police Department. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area is located in a developed Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 52 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum area that has officers routinely patrolling the area and would not require the police department to expand patrol routes. Police would be able to access the site through any of the main access roads, including those that define the Project boundary (Rancho California Road, Interstate 15, Cherry Street, Diaz Road) as well as connecting streets. In addition, the City of Temecula has developed impact fees to enable the expansion of police protection facilities, the addition of police protection personnel, and enables the City to obtain additional police equipment, as necessary. Future development would be subject to project -level CEQA analysis and mitigation, and be required to pay any impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits. Also, the police department has indicated that the Project would not result in the need for expanded or additional facilities to accommodate the additional officers. For these reasons, the Project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered police facilities. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. a.iii) Schools As discussed, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in 10,805 new residents, which would generate an additional student population for the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVSD). Implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is anticipated to generate 4,198 K-12 students; however, this represents a conservative estimate because the generation rates are based on single-family housing, and the multi -family housing Projects that would be developed under the Project typically do not have as large a household size as single-family housing. The schools serving the Project area would not have sufficient capacity to handle additional numbers of students generated by the Project. TVUSD plans to build additional schools in the area to accommodate future population growth in the next 10 to 15 years. In 1986, the State passed AB 2926 to assist in providing funding for school facilities to serve students generated by new development Projects. AB 2926 allowed school districts to collect impact fees from developers of new residential and commercial/industrial developments. These development fees are deemed to fully mitigate for impacts to schools caused by new development. The developer fees in 2013 were $2.97 per square foot of residential development and $0.47 per square foot school fee for commercial, industrial and federally qualified senior Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 53 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum housing. New rates have been approved that increased developer fees for residential development to $3.79 per square foot and commercial, industrial, and federally qualified senior housing to $0.61 per square foot (City of Temecula, 2018). All residential and non-residential development would be required to pay the school fees in effect at the time of development. Therefore, Project impacts to schools are considered to be less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. adv) Parks and Recreation As discussed above and in the Certified PIER, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would increase the population of the City of Temecula by introducing new residential units into the area. The additional 10,805 residents would increase the use of city parks. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan includes plans for a future sports park located at Cherry Street and Jefferson Avenue. The proposed approximately 56-acre sports park would provide additional park and recreational space for residents. The City of Temecula currently offers 3.1 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. The addition of 10,805 new residents would reduce the existing parkland ratio to 2.7 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Therefore, in order to maintain the existing ratio, an additional 41 acres of new parkland would need to be provided. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would include a 56- acre park, which would result in a new ratio of 3.2 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. In addition, the City's General Plan includes the policy that the City shall require developers of residential projects greater than 200 units to dedicate land based on the park acre standard of 5 acres of usable parkland to 1,000 residents. In lieu of parkland dedication, the City of Temecula allows developers to pay impact fees to fairly distribute the costs of park expansion and maintenance to new development as stipulated by the Quimby Act. Future development would be subject to project -level CEQA analysis and mitigation, and be required to dedicate parkland or pay fees -in -lieu prior to the issuance of building permits. In addition, current developer fees are $6,626.17 per unit for attached units and $9,255.12 per unit for detached units (City of Temecula, 2018). While the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in an increase in demand for recreation facilities, payment of the developer fees and dedication of parkland or fees -in -lieu would offset Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 54 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum any increased deterioration of existing parks. Therefore, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in less than significant impacts related to recreational facilities. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact than "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be significant and unavoidable. a.v) Libraries and Other Public Facilities The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would incrementally increase the demand for library services over the buildout timeframe of 20 years. However, the population increase generated by the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (approximately 10,805 people) is accounted for in the City's anticipated population growth forecast of 118,900 people by 2035 (SLAG, 2012). The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is anticipated to have minimal impacts on library services and would not affect the County's ability to provide library services or create the need to construct new library facilities or expand existing facilities. Therefore, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in less than significant impacts to library services. There are a number of healthcare facilities that would have capacity to serve residents of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. These include the Rancho Springs Medical Center, which expanded its facilities and increased medical beds to 120 beds in 2011 to accommodate the growth in the region, and the Inland Valley Medical Center, which has expanded its facilities and the size of the emergency department and intensive care unit to 122 beds. In addition, Universal Health Services has opened and expanded its emergency departments in Murrieta and has opened the new Temecula Valley Hospital, which consists of a 140-bed hospital, a 20-bed intensive care unit (ICU), a Consolidated Treatment Unit, a cardiac catheterization lab and a fitness rehabilitation center. This hospital is located approximately 3.2 miles southeast of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan site and would serve the future residents of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Given the capacity of the existing healthcare facilities, the population generated by the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would be adequately served by the existing facilities and impacts related to the expansion or provision of additional healthcare facilities would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right -of - Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 55 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact than "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be significant and unavoidable. XIII. Transportation/Traffic Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not Identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project' Specific Plan PEIR 16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ❑ ❑ establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an ❑ increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding ❑ public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Discussion The discussion of potential impacts related to transportation and traffic is based on the Jefferson Avenue Specific Plan Transportation Impact Analysis (TIS), prepared by Fehr & Peers on March 23, 2015. a) Plans, Ordinances, and Policies As discussed in the Certified PEIR, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would be required to be consistent with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (i.e., bus turnouts, bicycle racks). Furthermore, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would promote the use of bicycles, pedestrians, and transit. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would incorporate several trails that connect to existing trails along Murrieta Creek, which would encourage Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 56 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum additional pedestrian travel. In addition, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would provide additional opportunities throughout the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area for sidewalks as new roadways are constructed, particularly west of Jefferson Avenue. These roadways would increase connectivity and create a more pedestrian -friendly environment. Finally, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would create a denser, mixed -use environment, which would encourage greater use of transit. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be significant and unavoidable. b) Congestion Management Programs The focus of the Congestion Management Programs (CMP) is the development of an Enhanced Traffic Monitoring System in which real-time traffic count data can be accessed by Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) to evaluate the condition of the Congestion Management System (CMS) as well as meet other monitoring requirements at the State and federal levels. Per the adopted level of service target of Level of Service (LOS) E, a deficiency plan is required when a CMS segment falls to LOS F. Preparation of a deficiency plan is the responsibility of the local agency where the deficiency is located. Other agencies identified as contributors to the deficiency also will be required to coordinate with the development of the plan. The plan must contain mitigation measures, including Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies and transit alternatives, and a schedule of mitigating the deficiency. To ensure that the CMS is appropriately monitored to reduce the occurrence of CMP deficiencies, it is the responsibility of local agencies, when reviewing and approving development proposals, to consider the traffic impacts on the CMS. The main CMP facility within Southwestern Riverside County is I-15. There are no CMP arterials or roadway segments within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area; therefore, there would be no impacts to CMP facilities. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 57 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would significant and unavoidable. c) Air Traffic Patterns The Certified PEIR determined that the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in a less - than -significant impact or no impact to air traffic patterns. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to air traffic patterns that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would not be significant. d) Hazardous Design Features The Certified PEIR determined that the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in a less - than -significant impact or no impact to hazardous conditions due to a design feature or incompatible uses. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to hazardous conditions due to a design feature or incompatible uses that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would not be significant. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 58 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum e) Emergency Access The Certified PEIR determined that the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in a less - than -significant impact or no impact to hazardous conditions due to a design feature or incompatible uses. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in an impact to hazardous conditions due to a design feature or incompatible uses that was not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. 0 Public Transit, Bicycle, or Pedestrian Facilities The Certified PEIR determined that the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would introduce any conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same Impact as "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would not be significant. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 59 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum XIV. Utilities and Service Systems Potentially Significant Same or less impact than Impact Not Identified in the identified in the certified Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): "Approved Project" Specific Plan PEIR 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water 0 drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to El accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? a, b, e) Wastewater As discussed in the Certified PEIR, buildout of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would intensify land uses within the site and would, therefore, result in an increased generation of wastewater flows from the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan site. All wastewater produced by the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would be treated by the Temecula Valley RWRF. The Temecula Valley RWRF currently has an 18 MGD treatment capacity. EMWD has plans for two expansion projects to increase the total treatment capacity to 28 mgd (EMWD, 2013). Recent planning studies have indicated that the footprint of the Temecula Valley RWRF could accommodate treatment facilities with up to 37 mgd of capacity, if needed. EMWD has indicated that projected wastewater flows generated by the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would require approximately 0.8 mgd of additional capacity at the Temecula Valley RWRF beyond the currently planned capacity expansion to 28 mgd. The additional 0.8 mgd of wastewater flow would necessitate a future capacity expansion from 28 mgd to 32 mgd (EMWD, 2013). Therefore, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan would result in the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. Implementation of mitigation measures discussed in the Certified PEIR would reduce the potential impacts to be less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 60 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact than "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. c) Storm Drain Resources The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan PEIR would involve the expansion of commercial development and the introduction of residential uses into the area. However, the majority of this increase in square footage would be from new vertical, and not horizontal, development. New development would not occur within the existing open space district, a large impervious area. Furthermore, some of the development districts, located in existing impervious settings, may include residential and commercial open space. Therefore, the amount of impervious surfaces in the Project area would not be anticipated to increase substantially and would not result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact than "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. d) Water Supply and Demand As discussed in the Certified PEIR, a water supply assessment is required for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, as it would result in the construction of more than 500 residential units and would include a commercial component with more than 250,000 square feet of floor space. The buildout of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan will increase the District's potable water demand by the year 2043 by approximately 1,671 AFY of water, yielding a total Projected potable demand of 125,372 AF by 2043. The water supply Projections in the Certified PEIR demonstrate that Projected supplies exceed demand through the year 2043, while factoring in the projected demand required for the Project. These projections consider land use, water development programs and projects, and water conservation. Analyses of normal, single -dry, and multiple -dry year scenarios in the WSA also demonstrate the District's ability to satisfy demand during the 30-year planning period in all hydrologic conditions, even under reduced imported water supply conditions. Collectively, the information included in the WSA identifies a sufficient and reliable water supply for the District, now and into the future, including a sufficient water supply for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Therefore, impacts to water supply demand are less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in additional construction activities The proposed Project would create sidewalk improvement standards, which would include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. The implementation of the proposed streetscape and sidewalk landscape standards would occur within the existing right-of- way or within the right-of-way where any new street is constructed. The proposed Project would be within the design parameters considered in the Certified PEIR and would not allow for Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 61 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Plan EIR Addendum development at a greater density/intensity than previously considered. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in impacts that were not previously considered in the Certified PEIR. CONCLUSION: Same or Less Impact than "Approved Project." The proposed Project would be consistent with the analysis and conclusions presented in the Certified PEIR; thus, impacts would be less than significant. References California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2018. CNPS Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California, http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/, accessed on June 10, 2018 CGS, 2002. California Geological Survey (CGS), How Earthquakes Are Measured, CGS Note 32, Available at http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/Documents/Note_32.pdf. CGS, 2018. California Geological Survey (CGS), Seismic Hazard Zones, Murrieta quadrangle, Available at http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SHP/EZRIM/Reports/SHZR/SHZR—1 15—Murrieta.pdf City of Temecula, 2018. Development Impact Fees, available https://temeculaca.gov/fees Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), 2013. Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Technical Memorandum. December 20, 2013. Fehr and Peers, 2013. Jefferson Avenue Specific Plan, Transportation Impact Analysis Draft Report. Prepared for ESA and City of Temecula. Published August 16, 2013. Keyser Marston Associates (KMA), 2012. Jefferson Avenue Study Area Market Assessment. Published July 27, 2012. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2011. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Available: http://www.agmd.gov/home/rules- compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/ceqa-air-quality-handbook-(1993) Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG), 2008. Adopted 2008 RTP Growth Forecast, by City. Available at http://www.scag.ca.gov/forecast/adoptedgrowth.htm State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), 2010. Integrated Report (Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List / 305(b) Report). Available: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/tmdl/integrated2010.shtml State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), 2016. Integrated Report (Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List / 305(b) Report). Available: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/tmdl/integrated2014_2016.shtml Uptown Temecula Specific Plan 62 ESA Specific Plan EIR Addendum November 2018 Appendix A Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments ESA Appendix B Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards ESA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: LR16-0223 and LR17-0724 APPLICANT: City of Temecula PROPOSAL: An amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to make clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification of legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, to make minor typographical edits and the adoption of Appendix G, establishing streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which includes the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission of the city of Temecula adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the proposed Uptown Temecula Specific Plan amendments and the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. ENVIRONMENTAL: Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared, which concludes that the proposed changes, additions, or modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and/or mitigated in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified in November 2015 (SCH #2013061012). None of the conditions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that require the preparation of a subsequent EIR are present, and no additional environmental review is required. CASE PLANNER: Dale West, (951) 693-3918 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: March 20, 2019 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 p.m. Project SiteL.°� Y+W �p DR' 1 �i �'WY.p 1 1 fig. AA City Boundary 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile r u3}` The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — TemeculaCAgov — and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition forjudicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. PC RESOLUTION NO. 19-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, TO CLARIFY THE SETBACKS OF BUILDINGS AND PARKING SPACES, THE PLACEMENT AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES, TO CLARIFY LEGAL NON -CONFORMING USES, TO INCLUDE CERTAIN LAND USES AS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW, TO MAKE MINOR TYPOGRAPHICAL EDITS AND TO ADOPT UPTOWN TEMECULA STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS FOR THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN, WHICH INCLUDE THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONCRETE MATERIALS, STREET LIGHTING, STREET TREES, AND UNDERSTORY PLANTS, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED STREETSCAPE AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS AND AMENDMENTS TO THE UPTOWN TEMECULA SPECIFIC PLAN ARE EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR16-0223 AND LR17-0724)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 17, 2015, the Temecula City Council adopted the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and directed staff to prepare a streetscape beautification plan for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. B. In February of 2016, staff initiated the preparation of the Uptown Temecula Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards and entered into an agreement with Spurlock Landscape Architects to assist with the preparation of the streetscape and sidewalk standards. C. In April of 2017, staff identified a need to amend the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to make clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification of legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, and to make minor typographical edits. D. In July and August of 2017, staff along with Spurlock Landscape Architects held two community workshops to obtain the input into the development of sidewalk landscape standards. E. Throughout the process of preparing the UTSP Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards, staff met with the Planning Commission and City Council Ad -Hoc Subcommittees to present findings from the community workshops and the consultant's recommendations for incorporation into the UTSP Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards. F. The City of Temecula Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 20, 2019, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Planning Application No. LR16-0223 and LR17-0724, hereby finds, determines and declares that: code. A. The proposed specific plan is consistent with the general plan and development The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the General Plan, as amended. The Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development in order to maintain the overall quality of life within the City. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. These amendments do not conflict with any goals, policies or standards of the Temecula General Plan and do not conflict with any goals, policies or development standards of the adopted Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. B. The proposed specific plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The proposed amendments to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan project has been reviewed by the Public Works and Fire Departments staff to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The Specific Plan, when approved, was reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, as amended. The approved Specific Plan set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan establishes specific building design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. The proposed amendments to the Specific Plan include clarifications to the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, minor typographical edits, and the adoption of a streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which include the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards do not change the land use designations or anticipated land use developments as proposed under the Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards provide clarifications development standards, state required land uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area. D. The proposed specific plan amendments and Sidewalk Improvement Standards shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The approved Specific Plan is a form -based code which emphasizes the physical form of buildings to foster predictable built results as the organizing principle for the code, rather than focusing on the strict separation of uses. The proposed Specific Plan amendments and Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards clarify development standards and requirements related to legal non -conforming uses, and provide specific improvement standards for streets and sidewalks within the Specific Plan area, thereby, ensuring the Specific Plan area will be developed in the desired character as anticipated with the adoption of the Specific Plan and continue to provide for a mix of land uses including commercial and residential uses, consistent with the surrounding area. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In November 2015, the City Council certified an EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (State Clearing House #2013061012). Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared because some changes or additions to the certified EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present and therefore a subsequent EIR does not need to be prepared. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of March 2019. Gary Watts, Chairman ATTEST. -- Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 19-12 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of March 2019, by the following vote: AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Guerriero, Turley-Trejo, Watts None Telesio, Youmans None Luke Watson Secretary Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: LR16-0223 and LR17-0724 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendments and Sidewalk Improvement Standards Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area located in the northwestern area of Temecula, bounded by Cherry Street on the north, 1-15 on the east, Rancho California Road on the south, and Diaz Road on the west • �R a.w� Project Site �s 0 r aiOR J.H.ity Ile �p� P� afi dRAR9 x-ttf�� ,AS 5 �a Y �O ti QA Bourdar ��P� �a 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile u} c I to i l i l �l BA RGC A IL Proposal: An amendment to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan to make clarifications for the setbacks of buildings and parking spaces, the placement and/or relocation of utilities, clarification of legal non -conforming uses, the allowance of certain land uses as required by state law, to make minor typographical edits, and the adoption of Appendix G, establishing streetscape and sidewalk standards for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, which includes the specifications for concrete materials, street lighting, street trees, and understory plants. Environmental Action: Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum to the EIR was prepared, which concludes that the proposed changes, additions, or modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and/or mitigated in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified in November 2015 (SCH #2013061012). None of the conditions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that require the preparation of a subsequent EIR are present, and no additional environmental review is required. PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: April 23, 2019 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition forjudicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Dale West, City of Temecula Community Development Department, (951) 694-6444. CITY COUNCIL - BUSINESS ITEM NO . 23 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Reaffirming the Principles Outlined in the Constitution of the United States of America (At the Request of Mayor Naggar and Council Member Rahn) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REAFFIRMING THE PRINCIPLES OUTLINED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BACKGROUND: This item is coming before the City Council at the request of Mayor Naggar and Council Member Rahn. Recently both expressed a desire to reaffirm their commitment to support and defend the principles outlined in the Constitution of the United States of America and in the public official's oath of office. The attached resolution represents their collective thoughts on the subject matter. The members recommend that the City Council, as a full legislative body, discuss and consider the attached resolution for adoption. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 19- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REAFFIRMING THE PRINCIPLES OUTLINED IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Whereas, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, specifically state that "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. " Inherent in these rights is a fundamental desire for self-determination; and Whereas, in order to best preserve and protect the liberty guaranteed in our existing Constitution, government must have sufficient power vested in it to protect these individual rights, but never so much power that it inadvertently or intentionally tramples on these rights; and Whereas, power is therefore divided in the Constitution between the states and the federal government, and further divided in the federal government between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, to preserve local control and state sovereignty while preventing concentrated power and tyranny; and Whereas, when taking the oath of office, elected and appointed officials, as well as military personnel, reaffirm their commitment to the existing Constitution, when they recite, "I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. "; and Whereas, any amendments to the existing Constitution must be made either by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and Senate, or by a Constitutional Convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures, and ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, and Whereas, any attempts to establish a subservience to a federal government that purports to act in the best interest of all, directly conflicts with the existing Constitution and its intended balance of power between the federal and state government, and Whereas, any such attempts also conflict with the existence of congressional representatives in the House and Senate who are directly elected by the people to ensure all perspectives are considered, and that no single voice becomes so strong as to diminish the importance of the full republic; and Whereas, the founders of this great nation, recognized that despite varying forms of political philosophies throughout the world, a Constitutional Republic was the best form of government to preserve genuine liberty in the United States of America; and Whereas, while the Great Recession seemingly tore a hole in the fabric of the national economy and the American people's belief in capitalism, recovery occurred because of this framework, and not in spite of it; and Whereas, all other economic and political schools of thought including socialism and communism, have emerged as a serious threat to our republic and the representation described in our Constitution; and Whereas, socialism specifically is defined in Merriam -Webster as "any of the various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods; a system of society or group living in which there is no private property; and a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state, " and therefore inherently conflicts with the principles outlined in the existing Constitution of the United States; and Whereas, we encourage all local, state and federal governments to reaffirm their commitment to the existing Constitution of the United States and to their oath of office by adopting similar resolutions; Now, therefore, the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby reaffirm its commitment to support and defend the principles outlined above and set forth in the Constitution of the United States of America and in our oath of office. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of April, 2019. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 19- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of April, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk ITEM NO . 24 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Appoint Subcommittee of the City Council to Assist with the Selection Process for State and Federal Legislative Consultants PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint a two member subcommittee to assist staff in the selection process for state and federal legislative consultants. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula (City) is undergoing a Request for Proposal (RFP) process for its state and federal legislative consultant services. Specifically, the City is seeking consultants with demonstrated records of effectiveness representing the interests of local government, to implement the City's annual legislative platform, provide assistance on emerging state and federal issues of interest to the City, and assist in searching and applying for state and federal grants and programs. The consultants will provide advocacy, monitoring and reporting services, and will play a key role in increasing the City's visibility, and strengthening relationships with state and federal legislative delegations. The RFP will be live on PlanetBids, the City's electronic bidding system, from April 1-30, 2019. It is recommended that the City Council appoint a two member subcommittee to assist staff in the selection and recommendation process following the close of the bidding period. Any recommendations by the subcommittee to enter into an agreement with said consultants will be approved by the full City Council at a regular meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS ITEM NO . 25 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: City Council Travel/Conference Report PREPARED BY: Luisa Tovar, Executive Assistant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. On January 30, 2019 through February 1, 2019, Council Member Zak Schwank traveled to Irvine, California to attend the League of California Cities New Mayor/Council Member Conference. On March 12, 2019, Council Member Matt Rahn traveled to Washington, DC to meet with City Lobbyist (Turch & Associates) and Federal Offices. On March 22, 2019, Council Member Zak Schwank traveled to Sacramento, California to attend the California Park & Recreation Society Reception Awards and Banquet. ATTACHMENT: Itineraries i OL A I j IIAj i 1 r w z Q w Q z� N � CD N � v t6 CO 'a= cic� Z D a o u y v a z -MO�, c bz m T \ o E i-r LL f6 O bA O i O E O 7 .� O O :+ f/] -ICo U Lin L 3 ®r 4- -0 O Q 4, Q) d N N C O C4� L >' � L fa Q C C O Q ai E o O O " w 41 ci O L > +� O m O L 0 i.J \yO i > ++ L QJ V a1 C i N ti a) > Q! U N �� Ln o Q �`cz cu LO O 1 -O - N O U a i bA Q" •� l0 vf'� �vo� Us ° e°,o� fa,�+, to C tnba to i Q a r c 0 O a� c `�° +� v ra �° Ln dA o a, 4- a c c c W c :c o 4� c Qqj N - a E —O � 30 •S m bbb ,, vi j N X v v i 6 v� .O � i o a, 'o U 0 '�o O a, " O Vi 60 (n -Q +� a 0 J L 4, E � US O v�i 3 iJ i1 LA �w z �A w a� _ t � U c N � v c° � w= u O Ln N GC C OJ Q '3 bA a c i cv N 4J 0 O >, t!1 OD M tw,O -O •u Q ate••, "a Q 'a- i Q E 0 c C c O o 6 -0 O E ate•, a-, m 0 = a✓ O O >,wbDm a� O a) >' QbA v ' c O c v OOO >A N O T.aV) i > U.) M "O M c • N - fC c 3 c a a� V + CL +J bA vi 0 a✓ u = O 0 >, bZ C: y N 0 .� C •� s 0 c O m e o '° O i u a) c a) m 4+ + a u O a, 0 0 o c V o Q o o M W bb -0 4. +� c6 m O o 41 � t � O +� '� N N a 0 d0 O +T T :3 a�i N N O O u _ u i O +, = 0 .0 bA O 3-0 a-+ Q a u u � O E '� v T u c t O w J C E 0 Q Q 3 a •= d cu N LL O Ln O u c ate' O o `p 3 o v a) '- W Q U is u0 � -0 u bA � O � $, i Oc - M 3 N 41 2 v , O -O +1 N O1 fn W d V M d cN6 L (C E N' E Z 6i H N N z 41 O o av u > a� a- V N O .� MtkA N f� fa a) a) CL bA L •f4 a✓ •� I � L V d o bA s � Gj N `� � }' ai c , �+ E� o a) f6 3= � N ar a)2 6 Lo O O = b�0 bz c > = H LO O a)m 7 V) v c° ca w e c 0 u + o O r o •0 •� bMO a, M c a) V a) o_ 0 V) W a_T' •O 3 c V v V u o �` a� 0 v ca 0 E 4; r O O N+, : U j p bb vi N v `6 4. U.) f° C — a) -0 v c 0 i L O L N ++ dJ N C t—' u O O O Y. m O T V 0 4-'Eb— L f6 +, O •� R v 0 O N .0 u °ucQ�� •y c � �� 3 0��� �'� � � c o o� � � �� m L C L ❑. a a � L Q V p O J N a- U O O Q in >+ d• O N ^VI d Ln •-I N Q c o H •O 3 Z �+ V 4� +, J M ra _ d �W o T V o u L O M •� ti 0 V w' Lo J W 2 v �, c�i o v }, u Q c 0 m N L a� c 0 u 0 M w t u Q Z O LL Q u LL O w w J « ) C \ (IJ / / Ln \ 0 to o §_ G \ " ) 2 � � k c 0 / 2 C: % U / E \ k ° x = _._ /{\ . / / § } L > �eU') § § 2 o t22�E b�0 %fU-V � / 0 > c 0/ m E 0) 1/ 9 w o a � a) E O f % 2 / ® r / u •- 6 ( 2 { / / e 2 .$ y $ \ V -rpb / » uo { o \ X / ± ƒ 2 _ \ / \ / / CL > M g @ m,_ m > u % # _ R Z& d V a a EC7- W) u# 3? u \ E / E � § E � § Q A x N c -Ca, v �_ L E i > ° aJ > s °j L ca a1 E V L +' cB E O V L L a+ f0 L O VO a a! L tA Ln 'N LOr 0- ate c p Z` Ou U L o C m C: 4c � U) c �0 >- a) p�++ p �•� i 0_ p 0 O 0 ° c N N u i U N v1 ' O c 4� bA dA ra ° O_ L O °� Ln ° N 4- 0 C-0� L O O �' v c L L bA c -0 a) aA L i CLrl)_ a1 u aJ 0 v�i �..r .� � O Ln-0 E O C .-I «� v a� a� a ro > o c ry 4) co v — ° V W ni >o a. a, 2 E bbb V) °u 4 Z LnCL a, v >- > 3 N a1 �, N O m 00 c c C 00 ' +1 U 4- M° °, C p N. d c -0 u u> o 0 > m a� > ns 0 O N "aNi M U O o c vi •— O v L o c dlp c a, ca T a1 O V L tka +' >, fQ cb p J a 4-0 t6 �O u o N R N O v 0 0 6 v L Q N U Vi +, O V)E a! u 0 0 A N 0 rb f06 c O aJ to p 0 V C—;N 0 0 T -0 !E•— c� co T •= °' o co c 3 E +. c p u ra EL E C dA ,n E 0o >, v Q v>° c� v aJ m i 6 'u Y E c •O = o O N aui o v•� of ra a ° C `'i ° c V) p V) a1 (v O N 3 c m aJ L L > -a T a, O O C'CY) '� E ° u cu o ° aj J .N-Itca °u >, v0i coo ca 3: tka • E C m : Go H m 13 C m J ._ O O •V O IL m O O I O O C) L ca +1 4� C v 0 V1 GO >Sn , 4+ m E cu J .� o v a, E' N L +, o E c ° >, o +J '> a� N +J O u 72 O � 0 ELn v O v 0 aj 0 4• *' u -0 t>C O u O c w V)a1 L L c d a1 c cG M ++ u C to ++ aJ ° c� +' EL � 0 fC 0' u 0 u C Q'j a Q d m a .E .E as L bA u E N c N L ° W 4-1 m O c UN N N L +. 0- 4J Q "0 v u O' o N 0 m u 0 p c N u c u L 4J c aT+ bwb NO Q i6 co u76- d ° bA. bOn v E O o c w c v o o N Y `p O 0 41 V)c > a1 L L +. m LU 41 3 m Ln .-i I LO r-I c - ° a, E a1 bA L +, � J N L u i O c N u m u O i T C N f0 O O L C vi v o v > 0 u O v � > .E O O 0 (Q >, . E u Ln N w u Q z x 0 LL a u 0 w C7 w J a Q w C W a C i I h O U. W > W H u z u a W > W 0 Q 4A ' � 4A �- rya w o W W L �U gam W a) W O t J 00 CL J Y co V � V OG p z v z z O n � o " V a z N = L CD O � W 00 r-i N Q Q YJ C= do O i cu a, c > rC O � I.? +L.+ i>% w > N o = c °�' N ' r6 ai u u �C e� 3 Q v o.� v �; c 1 j> U 0 _ m o �, o . y �, �, J ° '�J �oa Q� �'0 o t W Q •_ � L C -0 Ol L 1 o Cz Ei v a, -0 v V R a a, .N 0- o 0 0 °c !Q u'1 a, c v -0 ra -D O ,o O Q� L ai Q •— t ai ,� — +, N a1 N a) L = C = O 4- c H al m •�40 3 W U ' U fa r u dA .c V o L L vu ac, LaO 0 b �3 3 m 0OLo4r�:r L o = G. 6, �, cn +b z 3 a, E s. Z 66 - bz c rQ u 0 4J u v v 0 V) N ai V) Lu H u z 0 Q u LL 0 W Q w J David lurch and Associates MAYOR MATT RAHN WASHINGTON, D.C. SCHEDULE MARCH 10 —13, 2019 MONDAY, MARCH 11 TUESDAY, MARCH 12 TBD Isaac Irby, Legislative Fellow — Transportation Office of Senator Kamala Harris 112 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 202-224-3553 WEDNESDAY, MARCH 13 12:45 pm Meet Richie O'Connell, Congressman Calvert's Office, inside DOT Entrance Department of Transportation On 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 1:00 pm Christopher Mitton, Government Affairs Officer Intergovernmental Affairs Office Mike Russo, Special Assistant Office of Congressional Affairs US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 POC: Mike Russo 202-366-4904 office Michael.d.russo@dot.gov Login (hfp://www.cprs.org/I/li/in/) Request Login (1/pw/rs/) C0MECT14"'lPq-7*NS Home (p/cm/Id/&fid=760) Home (p/cm/Id/&fid=760) 2019 Conference Handouts (p/cm/Id/&fid=900) Education (p/cm/Id/&fid=860) Registration (p/cm/Id/&fid=767) Schedule (p/cm/Id/&fid=808) Special Events (p/cm/Id/&fid=765) Special Features (p/cm/Id/&fid=833) CPRS Mobile APPI (p/cm/Id/&fid=806) Meetings (p/cm/Id/&fid=783) Housing (p/cm/Id/&fid=768) Exhibitors (p/cm/Id/&fid=790) Sponsors (p/cm/Id/&f1d=770) Room Hosts (p/cm/ld/&fid=769) CEUs (p/cm/Id/&fid=804) Schedule At a Glance Basic CPRS Conference & Expo Schedule; dates, times and events subject to change Tuesday, March 19, 2019 7:00 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. - Park Development & Operations Symposium (p/cm/Id/fid=789) 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. - Parks Make Life Better!® Tour (p/cm/IdMd=781) 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. - Registration Area Open 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. - NAYS Youth Sports Administrators Academy (p/cm/ld/fid=784) 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. - CPRS Board of Directors Meeting 12:30 p.m. - CPRS Golf Tournament (p/cm/ld/fid=832) 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. - Administrators Edutour: Tour and Learn! A Technical and Practical Approach to Understanding Project Drawings (p/cm/IdMd=866) 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. - Aging Intensive: Building Momentum with the Aging Services Professional (p/cm/IdMd=828) 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. - Aquatics Intensive: The Big Eye... Building the Future Leadership of Aquatics (p/cm/ld/fid=786) 1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. - Recreation Intensive: Leadership Challenge (p/cm/IdMd=787) Wednesday, March 20, 2019 8:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. - Registration Area Open 8:00 a.m. - 8:45 a.m. - Conference Rookies (p/cm/ld/fid=817) 8:45 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. - Education Sessions (p/cm/Id/fid=772) 9:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. - Commissioners/Board Members Intensive: Citizen Advocacy - What really works (p/cm/IdMd=857) 10:15 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. - Opening General Session (p/cm/Id/fid=780) 12:00 noon - 5:00 p.m. - Expo Open - Lunch Provided 2:45 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. - Education Sessions (p/cm/IdMd=792) 3:00 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. - Sacramento Walking Art Tour (p/cm/ld/fid=858) 4:15 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. - Education Sessions (p/cm/Id/fid=793) 6:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. - Welcome Reception (p/cm/Id/fid=777) - Progressive Party to the Punch Bowl! Thursday, March 21, 2019 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. - Wake Up Wellness (p/cm/Id/fid=813) 7:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. - CPRS Administrators Section - Networking Breakfast & General Membership Meeting 7:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. - Registration Area Open 8:15 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. - Education Sessions (p/cm/Id/fid=791) 9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. - Expo Open (Lunch provided 12:30 p.m.) 11:00 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. - Education Sessions (p/cm/Id/fid=797) 2:45 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. - Education Sessions (p/cm/Id/fid=798) 4:15 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. - Education Sessions (p/cm/ld/fid=799) 6:00 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. - Recreation Therapy Intensive (p/cm/Id/fid=837) 7:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. - District/Section Socials Friday, March 22, 2019 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. - Wake Up Wellness (p/cm/Id/fid=813) 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. - Recreation Therapy Institute (p/cm/ld/fid=788) 8:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. - Registration Area Open 8:30 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. - Education Sessions (p/cm/ld/fid=800) 9:30 a.m. - 11:15 a.m. - Education Session (p/cm/Id/fid=859) 10:15 a.m. -11:15 a.m. - Education Sessions (p/cm/Id/fid=801) 11:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. - Closing Session (p/cm/Id/fid=812) 6:00 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. - CPRS Annual Awards Reception & Banquet (p/cm/Id/fid=778) ITEM NO . 26 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file The following are the highlights for the Community Development Department for the month of March 2019. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases: In March 2019, Planning received 74 new applications and conducted six (6) Public Hearings. A detailed account of current planning activities is attached to this report. Plan Type March 2019 Conditional Use Permit 2 Development Plan 0 Home Occupations 37 Long Range Applications 3 Massage Permits 6 Modifications 13 Pre Applications 3 Sign Program 2 Specific Plan 1 Temporary Use Permit 7 Total 74 Winchester/Jefferson Hotel (PA17-1315): The City is processing a Development Plan for the construction of a three-story, over enclosed podium parking, 39,294 square foot hotel. The project is located behind the existing Rancho Car Wash on the corner of Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road at APN 910-282-002 and has 61 rooms with a second story pool/spa and deck area. The project was approved on March 13, 2019. (COOPER) Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment (PA19-0408): The City is processing a Specific Plan Amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specifc Plan for revisions to the rear yard setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet for PA18C, 20A, and 24; and to rear yard setbacks from 15 feet to 10 feet for PA22 and 23A only if they are developed as Age Qualified residences. (COOPER) Sommers Bend Private Recreation Center (PA19-0268): The City is processing a Development Plan for the Sommers Bend (formerly Roripaugh Ranch Phase II) Private Recreation Center containing an approximately 4,684 square foot clubhouse building, 3,492 square foot multi- purpose "barn" building, 5,862 square foot pool house building, and six (6) bungalows. The recreation center also contains three (3) pools, a tot lot, event lawn, spa, cabanas, two (2) fire pits, outdoor kitchen area, and parking. The project is located within PA30 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. (COOPER) Heirloom Farms (PAs 18-0659,18-0660,18-0661): The City is processing a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 325 unit single family community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes, attached townhomes, and duplexes; a Specific Plan Amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan for a Residential Overlay within portion of Planning Area 12; and a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designations for Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan to a Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) land use. A community meeting was held on June 19, 2018 and further community outreach will take place prior to a public hearing. The project is located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. (COOPER) Rancho Highlands (PAs 18-0633, 18-0635, 0635): The City is processing a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 240 unit multi -family development generally located 775 feet southeast of Rancho California Road on the north side of Ynez Road; a Specific Plan Amendment to remove project parcels from the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan; and a Zone Change to bring the project's parcels of the Rancho Highlands Development Plan consistent with the General Plan land use designations of High Density Residential and Professional Office. (COOPER) LONG RANGE PLANNING Short Term Rentals Ordinance: Staff has developed a two-phase approach for addressing short- term rentals (STRs). The first phase involved surveys and community meetings to evaluate the interest and perspective of the community regarding short term rentals. Five community workshops were held over the summer of 2018. On October 16, 2018, staff presented results of the community workshops and survey to the City Council Short Term Rental Subcommittee, consisting of Council Member Rahn and Mayor Pro Tem Stewart. The Subcommittee expressed concerns about negative impacts created within a surrounding neighborhood, the unintended consequences to the available housing stock and prices, and the effects on the local tourism industry. The findings of the outreach meetings and public meetings was presented at the November 13, 2018 City Council meeting. The City Council directed staff to prepare an ordinance that includes, but is not limited to, requiring a host to be the primary residence of the STR, noise regulations and quiet times, fines for code violations, and revoking permits for repeat violators. The City Council also directed staff to prepare a fee study for the administrative costs to implement a STR program, including the collection of transient occupancy taxes (TOT) and the cost of enforcement activities. A workshop regarding STRs and possible components of the ordinance went before the City Council for discussion on March 12, 2019. At that meeting, the City Council provided three different directives: 1. To move forward with a request for proposal for a third party compliance vendor. 2. To move forward with an increased fine structure for unpermitted short-term rentals. 3. To return to the City Council subcommitee to further discuss a possible hosted short-term rental ordinance. The short-term rental subcommitee meeting is scheduled for April 23, 2019. Staff is identifying third -party solutions and working on an ordinance for an increased fine structure spacing. (RABIDOU, WEST, PETERS) Old Town Parking Study: Staff is working with Fehr and Peers Transportation Consultants to update the 2010 Old Town Parking Management Plan. The Study will take a detailed look at existing parking policies, standards, supply and demand within the study area, as well as the effect that planned future development and recently approved and pending projects for the area will have on future demand. The study will also identify custom strategies and standards for management of the study area parking supply. Staff is currently reviewing the draft Study. (JONES) Outdoor Vendor Ordinance: In conformance with Senate Bill ("SB") No. 946 Sidewalk Vendors which became effective January 1, 2019, an Ordinance of the City of Temecula to renumber Chapter 5.20 Outdoor Vendors on private property to Chapter 8.60 Outdoor Vendor on public and private Property in the Temecula Municipal Code regulating vendors Citywide. Currently, the City of Temecula Municipal Code prohibits outdoor vending in public parks and public right-of-way, in conflict with SB 946. The item is schedule for Planning Commision on April 17, 2019. (TOMA) Uptown Temecula Specific Plan: The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council on November 17, 2015. The Streetscape and Sidewalk Improvement Standards will serve as a technical companion document to the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, for City staff to use when reviewing development proposals and to instruct the developer about the street trees, light standards, sidewalk material type, and the plant pallet for any landscaping that may be proposed as part of a development plan. Public workshops were held on July 17 and August 31, 2017. The proposed Standards, In -Lieu Fee Nexus Study Update, and proposed amendments were reviewed by the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Subcommittee, then consisting of Council Members Comerchero and Edwards on September 26, 2017 and February 20, 2018. The Planning Commission Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Turley-Trejo and Guerrerio, and the City Council Subcommittee, now consisting of Mayor Naggar and Council Member Rahn, reviewed the documents in February 2019. This item was heard by the Planning Commission on March 20, 2019. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve staff recommendations. The City Council will hear this item on March 26, and April 23, 2019. (WEST) Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Park Service and multiple agencies on the Waves to Wineries Trail Plan (W2W). The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. The goals are to identify existing trails, gaps necessary to connect them, and develop and implement a strategy to fill in the missing links. (PETERS) SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SARDA) & AFFORDABLE HOUSING Mission Village Disposition and Development Agreement: The City is currently working with Affirmed Housing for the negotiation of a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) on the existing Mission Village Affordable Housing Complex. This DDA will result in the complete rehabilitation of the complex and secure affordable housing covenants on the property for an additional 55 years. The DDA is scheduled to go to City Council in 2019. (LEHNER) Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement: The City is currently working with Pacific West on the negotiation of a DDA for the development of 60 affordable housing units on City -owned property on Pujol Street. The DDA is scheduled to go to City Council in 2019. (WATSON, LEHNER) Affordable Housing RFP: In late 2015, the Successor Agency obtained clearance from the Department of Finance $12.4 million of affordable housing funds. The Supportive Housing Subcommittee directed staff to issue an RFP to solicit project proposals from interested developers for the construction of an affordable housing development. The City received twenty proposals from interested developers. Keyser Marston Associates assisted staff in the review and analysis of the proposals. The City is currently in negotiations for DDAs with developers for two separate properties. If these projects move forward, both sites will result in the construction of over 100 new affordable units. (WATSON, LEHNER) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) CDBG Administration: The City anticipates receiving approximately $546,925 in funding for Fiscal Year 2018-19. Two public workshops were held on November 30, 2017. The Finance Committee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tern Stewart and Council Member Edwards, provided funding recommendations on March 6, 2018. The City Council approved funding recommendations during a public hearing on April 24, 2018. The Comprehensive Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) was presented to City Council on September 25, 2018. The 2019-20 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) was released in November 2018. Two technical workshops were held for applicants on November 29, 2018. The Finance Committee provided recommendations for the 2019-20 program on February 26, 2019. The recommendations will go to the entire City Council on April 23, 2019. (LEHNER) ENERGY & CONSERVATION Solid Waste and Recycling Program: Staff manages the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Agreement with CR&R and acts as a liaison between the City, CR&R, and their customers. City staff and CR&R coordinate two Citywide Clean-up events each year. Staff also assists with outreach for the Riverside County Mobile Household Hazardous Waste Collection events and the Composting Workshops. The next Temecula Citywide Clean -Up is scheduled for May 11, 2019 at Chaparral High School. (WEST) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for March 2019 are highlighted in the following table. Additional statistics can be found as an attachment to this report. Building and Safety Statistics March 2019 Permits 195 New Single Family Homes 0 New Commercial Building 1 Photovoltaic 35 Tenant Improvements 11 Non Construction C of O 29 Number of Active Plan Checks 357 Number of Finaled Permits 114 Inspections 2377 Inspections Per Day 113.19 Inspections Per Person Per Day 29.29 Stops Per Inspector Per Month 485 Visitors to Counter 1021 New Construction Projects in Plan Check • Truax Hotel (161,586 sf) • Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 sf) • Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 sf each) • Temecula Village 160 unit apartment complex (39 buildings) • Staybridge Suites hotel (90,170 sf) • Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos) • Temecula Health Care (25,441 sf to be inspected by City; 53,926 to be inspected by OSHPOD) • iA Robotics (24,659 sf) • Hilton Garden Inn (67,570 sf) • Starbucks (1,850 sf) • Mexico Caf6 (13,519 sf) • John Hine Subaru Detail/Wash Building (1,744 sf) Certificate of Occupancy • Parlay Caf6 — 40764 Winchester Road • Girl Scouts of San Gorgonio Council — 40880 County Center Drive Tenant Improvements • Army/Navy Career Center— 39738 Winchester Road • Spectrum — 27536 Ynez Road • Desert Vein and Vascular Institute — 27290 Madison Avenue CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month of March, Code Enforcement responded to 63 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 139 code cases, conducted 296 inspections, conducted 1,180 weed abatement inspections and forwarded 45 referrals to Public Works, Police, Animal Control, Riverside County, Records, Business License, and Fire. Detailed Code Enforcement case activity can be found in the following chart. Type of Code Case arc Total Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 2 Vacant Home / Property Maintenance / Rodent/ Mold 13 Business or Home Occupation w/o license/CUP 14 Trash and Debris / Dumping 7 Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard 25 Green Pool / Vector Control 4 Graffiti 4 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control 22 Trailer / RV Stored/Boat/Parking 7 Construction w/o Permit/Building Code 12 Encroach Public ROW / Trash Cans 16 Zoning/Signs 9 Public Safety & Health 4 Total Number of Cases 139 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. The following charts demonstrate the past six months of activities in Temecula. Residential Foreclosure Tracking October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 DEFAULT 64 58 58 52 45 48 FORECLOSED 77 73 73 77 87 78 REO 44 50 50 51 51 54 TOTALS 185 181 181 180 183 180 Commercial Foreclosure Tracking October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 DEFAULT 3 2 2 2 2 1 FORECLOSED 1 1 1 1 1 1 REO 3 3 3 3 3 3 TOTALS 7 6 6 6 6 5 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Current Planning Activity Report 2. Community Development Statistics 3. Community Development Charts PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA19-0360 42211 Stonewood Rd 921-300-012 Dale West 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 Anissa Hopson SOMERSET LP PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Crowned Crane: A Home Occupation Permit for Online Retail PA19-0363 42457 Carino PI 944-182-014 Jaime Cardenas 03/01/2019 03/20/2019 Spencer Woollard Michael Gore PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Gore Residence MOD: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to add a 363 square feet to the existing garage and a new outdoor 292 square foot trellis at the existing single family home located at 42457 Carino Place. PA19-0364 32093 Camino Seneco 954-361-007 Brandon Rabidou 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 Cory Cook Brandon Parker PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Pressure Washing 911, LLC Home Occupation- Pressure Washing and Portering home occupation at 32093 Camino Seneco PA19-0366 44647 Corte Capistrano 961-052-014 Dale West 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 Marin James Johnson PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Christensen Occupation Case Title / Description: Brilliant Association Management, Inc.: A home occupation permit for Executive Management consulting for non-profit organizations PA19-0368 29605 Solana Way, G03 921-290-004 Jaime Cardenas 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 Lee Quintanilla 29605 Solana PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Way Occupation Case Title / Description: LeeQuintanilla: a home occupation business license for online retail sales of miscellaneous items (no food, weapons, drugs, etc.). PA19-0369 30835 Lolita Rd 945-180-014 Eric Jones 03/04/2019 Gladys Horowitz Gladys Horowitz PL Conditional Out Temecula, CA 92592 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Lolo's Hacienda Bed & Breakfast Conditional Use Permit: A Conditional Use Permit to allow for a Bed and Breakfast at an existing custom home located at 30835 Lolita Road. (APN: 945-180-014) PA19-0372 40820 Winchester Rd 910-420-030 Jaime Cardenas 03/04/2019 03/20/2019 Chris Dorsey Temecula Towne PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Center Assoc Case Title / Description: Pressed Juicery: a modification application for exterior changes consisting of new storefront glazing and white aluminum composite material panels for a future "Pressed Juicery" located at 40820 Winchester Road, Suite 260. Page 1 of 10 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA19-0376 42271 Gateshead Ct 965-041-029 Eric Jones 03/04/2019 03/04/2019 Karina Duke Shin Yoo PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Karina Duke's Photography - Photography: Home Occupation PA19-0379 28910 Rancho California Rd, 921-060-024 Jaime Cardenas 03/04/2019 Qingjie Zhou PL Massage Plan Review 101 Permits Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Dream Tree Spa MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Dream Tree Spa located at 28910 Rancho California Road, 101. PA19-0380 45112 Corte Bella Donna 961-192-014 Jaime Cardenas 03/05/2019 03/05/2019 Jose Banuelos Jose Banuelos PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Quality Landscape & Sprinkler Repair: a home occupation business license for landscaping and maintenance services. PA19-0384 31931 Via Saltio 961-222-007 03/05/2019 Edward Munguia PL Home Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Munguia Woodworks PA19-0387 41715 Enterprise Cir North , 909-281-025 Jaime Cardenas 03/05/2019 Vickie Li Enterprise Court PL Massage Plan Review 107 Permits Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Allo Spa MEP: a massage establishment permit for Allo Spa located at 41715 Enterprise Circle North, suite 107. PA19-0390 32228 Corte Utnehmer 959-352-018 Jaime Cardenas 03/05/2019 03/05/2019 Corey Wilson Michael Wilson PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: H2O Solutions Services: a home occupation business license for swimming pool cleaning services. PA19-0393 28999 Old Town Front St 922-110-038 Jaime Cardenas 03/06/2019 03/20/2019 Savana Batt Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Jackson House Temecula Minor Modification (Planning Review Only): A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to allow for wooden fence to create an outdoor patio space for Jackson House located at 28999 Old Town Front Street. Stewart Group PL Modifications Approved PA19-0394 30069 Corte Coelho 919-450-031 Jaime Cardenas 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 Art Torres Art Torres PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: PrepSports MVP: a home occupation business license for student athlete advocacy and consulting services. Page 2 of 10 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA19-0395 40820 Winchester Rd 910-420-030 Jaime Cardenas 03/06/2019 03/20/2019 Jovania Temecula Towne PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Faamaligi Center Assoc Use Permit Case Title / Description: Circus Vargas Major Temporary Use Permit: A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow a circus to be held at the Promenade Mall parking lot located at 40820 Winchester Road from March 21 through April 1, 2019. PA19-0397 30185 Mira Loma Dr 944-122-002 Jaime Cardenas 03/06/2019 Myrriah Sijabat Brant Tunget PL Modifications Corrections Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Tunget Addition MOD: a modification application for a 565 square foot addition to the existing single-family home located at 30185 Mira Loma Drive. PA19-0399 31743 Via Saltio 961-212-008 Jaime Cardenas 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 Max Zeledon Balvina Zeledon PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Zeledon Pools: a home occupation business license for pool cleaning services. PA19-0400 32399 San Marco Dr 959-142-014 Jaime Cardenas 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 Calvin Maranville Lawrence PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Maranville Occupation Case Title / Description: Calvin Maranville Designs: a home occupation business license for landscaping design services. PA19-0402 39804 Oak Cliff Dr 920-013-005 Jaime Cardenas 03/06/2019 03/06/2019 Joseph Bradfield Joseph Bradfield PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Bradfield Consulting: a home occupation business license for accounting services. PA19-0403 28011 Jefferson Ave 921-060-018 Jaime Cardenas 03/07/2019 Rick Johnson False Front PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: BBQ Islands Tent Sale TUP: a temporary use permit to allow outside display of patio furniture and barbecues at the parking lot outside the building located at 28011 Jefferson Avenue from April 1 through 4, June 10 through 15, and August 28 through September 2, 2019. PA19-0404 27715 Jefferson Ave 921-400-024 Jaime Cardenas 03/07/2019 Hilda Reyes Jefferson Capital PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Permits Case Title / Description: Ethereal Day Spa 1 MEP: a massage establishment permit application for Ethereal Day Spa 1 located at 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 201. Page 3 of 10 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA19-0406 30764 Grand View Cir 957-540-020 Brandon Rabidou 03/07/2019 03/07/2019 Michael Bryant Michael Bryant PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: B.B.R.S. (Bryant Buy Refurbish Sell) Home Occupation -A Home Occupation permit for Buy, Refurbish and sell Abandoned items (B.B.R.S) to operate at 30764 Grand View Circle PA19-0407 27901 Jefferson Ave 921-050-003 Jaime Cardenas 03/08/2019 03/20/2019 Burley Wright Dan Henderson PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Hendo's Fight Night: A Temporary Use Permit to allow for a mixed martial arts event on Saturday, April 6, 2019, from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. at 27901 Jefferson Avenue. PA19-0408 964-180-023 Scott Cooper 03/08/2019 Trent Heiner WOODSIDE 05S PL Specific Plan Out Case Title / Description: Roripaugh Ranch SPA: A Specific Plan Amendment #5 for Roripaugh Ranch for revisions to the rear yard setbacks from 20 feet to 10 feet for PA18C, 20A, and 24; and to rear yard setbacks from 15 feet to 10 feet for PA22 and 23A only if they are developed as Age Qualified residences. PA19-0412 33132 Yucca St 962-330-056 Jaime Cardenas 03/11/2019 03/11/2019 Autumn Herrera Chun Shao PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Butter and Eggs Bakery: a home occupation business license for sales of baked goods. PA19-0413 40414 Winchester Rd 910-470-001 Brandon Rabidou 03/11/2019 Inland Western PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Temecula Commons LLC Case Title / Description: Commons Landscape MOD: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to review drought tolerant landscape plans for the Commons Shopping Center located on the southwest corner of the Winchester/Margarita Road intersection. PA19-0414 42069 Dlr Dr 921-730-059 Eric Jones 03/11/2019 Melissa M&M GOSCH PL Temporary Out Temecula, CA 92591 Francisco Use Permit Case Title / Description: AT&T "Flower Pot" Cell TUP: a temporary use permit to allow a temporary cell tower to be erected for 12 months from the approval date at the existing Gosch Ford dealership site located at 42069 DLR Drive (APN 921-730-025). PA19-0417 40426 Winchester Rd 910-470-015 Jaime Cardenas 03/11/2019 Rianto Lie Inland Western PL Modifications Corrections Temecula, CA 92591 Temecula Commons LLC Case Title / Description: Temecula Commons Light MOD: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to allow parking lot light retrofit to more energy efficient L.E.D lights to the light pole fixtures on the parking lot of the existing "Commons" shopping center located at 40426 Winchester Road. Page 4 of 10 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA19-0420 42624 Indigo PI 944-060-020 Brandon Rabidou 03/11/2019 03/18/2019 Susan Paradiso PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Indigo Place MOD:A Modification application to add landscaping adjacent to lot 19 for Tract 33584 PA19-0422 44507 Cayenne Trl 960-103-027 Jaime Cardenas 03/12/2019 03/12/2019 Tammy Pappan Julian Dillavou PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Moen Occupation Case Title / Description: Tammy Pappan: a home occupation business license for residential cleaning services. PA19-0423 31817 Corte Mendoza 955-072-030 Jaime Cardenas 03/12/2019 03/12/2019 Matthew Smith Matthew Smith PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Matthew Smith: a home occupation business license for handyman services. PA19-0424 42188 Winchester Rd 909-310-012 Jaime Cardenas 03/12/2019 04/01/2019 Opty Fernandez Penske PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Penske EV Charging Station MOD: a modification application to install a new electric -vehicle charging station for Penske's electric fleet. The building is located at 42188 Winchester Road. PA19-0440 45710 Creekside Way 922-294-005 Jaime Cardenas 03/15/2019 03/20/2019 Lydia Garcia Johanna Ortega PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Ortega Sunroom Addition MOD: a modification application to add a 175 square foot sunroom to the rear of the existing property located at 45710 Creekside Way. PA19-0441 40013 Spring Place Ct 916-411-050 Brandon Rabidou 03/15/2019 03/15/2019 Cynthia Lanham Ernesto Salinas PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Inland Metal Trading Home Occupation - A home occupation permit for a Broker of Raw Metal Products located at 43092 Calle Ventura PA19-0442 31217 Mangrove Dr 961-430-022 Brandon Rabidou 03/15/2019 03/15/2019 Rebecca Perrin Robert McAllister PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Rebecca Perrin Home Occupation - A home occupation permit for a marketing consulting business located at 31217 Mangrove Dr. PA19-0443 29621 Deal Ct 921-381-012 03/15/2019 Jaime Grajeda Sandra Simon PL Home Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Grajeda Construction, Inc. - Construction Page 5 of 10 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA19-0449 31741 Temecula Pky 961-080-022 Jaime Cardenas 03/18/2019 Jian (Andy) Zhao New Plan Excel PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Realty Trust Inc. Permits Case Title / Description: Temecula Massage MEP: a massage establishment permit renewal for Temecula Massage located at 31741 Temecula Parkway, Suite B PA19-0453 27645 Ynez Rd 921-270-043 Jaime Cardenas 03/18/2019 Monica James PC VIDOR INC PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Chili's Reimage MOD: a modification application to change the paint scheme and fabric awnings to standing seam for the existing Chili's restaurant located at 27645 Ynez Road. PA19-0456 40390 Margarita Rd 910-330-014 Scott Cooper 03/19/2019 03/26/2019 Oscar Sanchez Cl Rancho II LLC PL Sign Program Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Raising Cane's Sign Program: A comprehensive Sign Program (#143) for the Raising Cane's restaurant located at 40390 Margarita Road PA19-0458 33472 Barrington Dr 966-190-040 Jaime Cardenas 03/19/2019 03/19/2019 Regina Hulten Daryl Hulten PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Regina Hulten: a home occupation business license for retailer sales of tangible personal property such as body works, lotions, and other topical products. PA19-0459 44456 Cayenne TO 960-101-030 Dale West 03/19/2019 03/29/2019 Kristina Rawlins Cameron PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Rawlins Occupation Case Title / Description: Kristina Rawlins Real Estate - Real Estate PA19-0470 40226 Tanager Cir 919-420-019 Jaime Cardenas 03/20/2019 03/20/2019 Guy Gilboa Guy Gilboa PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: GT Locksmith Inc.: a home occupation business license for locksmith services. PA19-0471 30030 Via Velez PI 944-152-004 Jaime Cardenas 03/20/2019 03/20/2019 Sarvia Juarez Toledo Juarez PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Gonzalez Occupation Case Title / Description: Sarvia Juarez Gonzalez: a home occupation business license for residential housekeeping services. PA19-0477 26491 Ynez Rd 910-300-018 Jaime Cardenas 03/21/2019 Tahying Wang PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Permits Case Title / Description: Happy Budda Foot Reflexology Spa: Massage Establishment Renewal Page 6 of 10 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA19-0478 40150 Winchester Rd 920-100-034 Jaime Cardenas 03/21/2019 Tahying Wang PL Massage Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Permits Case Title / Description: Happy Budda Foot Reflexology Spa: a Massage Establishment Permit Renewal for Happy Budda Foot Reflexology Spa located at 40150 Winchester Road. PA19-0480 32105 De Portola Rd 959-390-002 Scott Cooper 03/21/2019 04/01/2019 Justin Davis CITY OF PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 TEMECULA Case Title / Description: Sprint Margarita MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) for Sprint to remove and replace six (6) antennas and three (3) RRH's on existing towers located within the Paloma Del Sol Park at 32105 De Portola Rd. PA19-0483 31220 Taylor Ln 961-451-093 Jaime Cardenas 03/21/2019 03/21/2019 Aaron Honeycutt Temecula Creek PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Village Condo Occupation Owners Assn Case Title / Description: Honest A's Affordable Moving, Inc.: a home occupation business license for household moving services. PA19-0485 31965 Corte Avalina 955-194-022 Jaime Cardenas 03/21/2019 03/21/2019 Steven Tate Steven Tate PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Backyard Bouncers LLC: a home occupation business license for party equipment rental services. PA19-0486 31660 Briarwood PI 961-073-008 Jaime Cardenas 03/21/2019 03/21/2019 Joshua Byrd Joshua Byrd PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Blue Collar KrewApparel: a home occupation business license for clothing and accessories sales. PA19-0492 44712Adam Ln 961-451-093 03/22/2019 Nareerut Temecula Creek PL Home Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Potipitak Village Condo Occupation Owners Assn Case Title / Description: Luvluvkayla.Gift& Jewelry - Selling Gift & Jewelry - home occupation. PA19-0493 42200 Main St, 9A 922-053-038 Brandon Rabidou 03/25/2019 03/25/2019 Paul Munoz Westminster PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92590 2708 Holding Occupation LLC Case Title / Description: Paul Munoz Handyman VPM Home Occupation - A home occupation permit for a Handyman service. Page 7 of 10 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company PA19-0497 45442 Saint Tisbury St 962-300-001 Brandon Rabidou 03/25/2019 03/25/2019 Chris Henderson Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: 3PL Pro Advisors, LLC DBA eCommerce Pro Advisors Home Occupation - A home occupation permit for a logistics consulting business. Owner Plan Type Status Chris Henderson PL Home Approved Occupation PA19-0500 39820 Cross Creek Ct 919-410-031 Brandon Rabidou 03/25/2019 03/25/2019 Vitaly Nechay Vitaly Nechay PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Vitaliy Nechay - Appliance Repair Home Occupation: A Home Occupation permit for Vitaliy Nechay to operate an appliance repair business. PA19-0501 45251 Esplendor Ct 918-301-027 Brandon Rabidou 03/25/2019 03/27/2019 Zurisadai Cortes Juan Medina PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Vaciex LLC Home Occupation - A home occupation permit for E-Commerce retail and media sales. PA19-0504 29049 Overland Dr 921-680-035 Scott Cooper 03/26/2019 Lars Andersen Pacific Pacific PL Sign Program Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Development Development Partners Partners Case Title / Description: Margarita Crossing Sign Program Amendment: An Amendment to the Margarita Crossing Sign Program (#83) to modify the allowable signage on the corner monument signs. PA19-0505 40868 Winchester Rd 910-320-052 Jaime Cardenas 03/26/2019 Brittany Juarez PL Temporary Void Temecula, CA 92591 Use Permit Case Title / Description: T-Town Showdown - Temecula Craft Beer Celebration: A Minor TUP to allow an indoor private event in support of the Temecula Valley Craft Beer Month located at Carl Strauss Brewing Company PA19-0508 31986 Corte Castro 955-092-013 Eric Jones 03/26/2019 Brandin Checkos PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: MOD - Minor Modification (plan review only) for a 190 square feet guest house located at 31986 Corte Castro. PA19-0510 40868 Winchester Rd 910-320-052 Jaime Cardenas 03/27/2019 Brittany Juarez Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: TUP Temporary Use Permit (plan review) for a 7-Town Showdown" Temecula Craft Beer Celebration, set for Saturday, May 18, 2019, a for -profit event with expected attendance of 250 guests. The event will have operating hours from 5:00 PM to 11:00 PM and will be located at 40868 Winchester Road. Matthew Rattner PL Temporary Plan Review Use Permit Page 8 of 10 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA19-0511 46205 Via La Tranquila 962-440-014 Scott Cooper 03/27/2019 03/27/2019 Luciana Gutierrez Angel Gu PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Elite Mobile Detailing LLC - Mobile Detailing Service PA19-0512 28588 Old Town Front St 922-033-021 Eric Jones 03/27/2019 Steve Rawlings Ronald Darling PL Conditional Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Coin -op Game Room/Restaurant CUP: A Conditional Use Permit for a Type 47 ABC license (beer, wine, and distilled spirits) for a Coin -op Game Restaurant at 28588 Old Town Front Street PA19-0513 42200 Moraga Rd , #22E 921-310-014 Jaime Cardenas 03/27/2019 04/04/2019 Alicia Robinson MG Sage PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Canyon Occupation Apartments Case Title / Description: Doggin Out & Catering: a home occupation business license for hot dog catering services. PA19-0516 28964 Old Town Front St 922-120-010 Scott Cooper 03/27/2019 Cruz Harriman Hearn Street PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Holdings Use Permit Case Title / Description: Temecula Harley 2nd Annual Bike Blessing TUP: A Temporary Use Permit for Harley Davidson to conduct two bike blessings as well as live entertainment, food catering, and alcohol served. The event is to be conducted on April 13, 2019, from 11:00 a.m. through 4:00 p.m. PA19-0518 30453 Danube Ct 921-471-029 Scott Cooper 03/28/2019 03/28/2019 Arthur Wallace Chad Quidor PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Leland Wallace Art - (Home Occupation) Artist painting, productions and online sales PA19-0521 43359 Via Sabino 965-351-031 Scott Cooper 03/28/2019 03/28/2019 Jacob Findlay Michael Kohl PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: High Point Drone Services - Drone Photography & Videography PA19-0523 42140 Lyndie Ln , 3 921-311-033 Scott Cooper 03/28/2019 03/28/2019 Monika Hartman Donald PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Manderscheid Occupation Case Title / Description: Monika Hartman Photography - (Home Occupation) Photography Business PA19-0528 41876 5Th St 922-031-019 Dale West 03/29/2019 03/29/2019 Hugo Hernandez Hugo Hernandez PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Occupation Case Title / Description: H Handyman & Landscaping - Handyman & Landscaping Page 9 of 10 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA19-0533 41943 Niblick Rd 953-300-002 Jaime Cardenas 03/29/2019 Pedro Hernandez PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Hernandez Residence: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to add 360 square feet to an existing home at 41943 Niblick Road PREAPP19-0438 28410 Vincent Moraga Dr 921-281-018 Eric Jones 03/14/2019 04/04/2019 Calavo Growers PL Completed Temecula, CA 92590 of California Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Giuliano Foods Pre -Application: a pre -application for a future Giuliano Specialty Foods facility proposing outdoor storage of 50 to 100 6000-gallon brine tanks at the existing light industrial building located at 28410 Vincent Moraga Drive. PREAPP19-0499 27253 Via Industria 909-322-005 Scott Cooper 03/25/2019 Jim Bishay PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Temecula Medical Center Pre-App: A Pre -Application for a three building medical office project for drug & alcohol detoxification at 27253 Via Industria PREAPP19-0503 29275 Santiago Rd 922-130-018 Eric Jones 03/26/2019 Yan Santiago PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: AT&T Pre -application Santiago CUP/Wireless: A pre -application for a stealth wireless telecommunications facility (stealth monopine) located at 29275 Santiago Road Page 10 of 10 Communitv Develooment Statistics - Previous 12 Months 4/18 5/18 6/18 7/18 8/18 9/18 10/18 11/18 12/18 1/19 2/19 3/19 12 Month Total/Average BUILDING AND SAFETY Inspections 1,825 1,707 1,640 1,272 2,172 1,452 1,809 1,632 1,317 1,561 1,111 2,377 19,875 Inspections Per Day 86.9 77.59 78.09 58 94.43 76.42 78.65 85.9 69.3 70.95 61.72 113.2 79 Inspections Per Person Per Day 21.72 19.39 19.52 17 31.47 19 19.66 21.47 17.32 17.73 15.43 29.3 21 Permits 278 254 282 233 278 224 260 212 156 235 172 195 2,779 New SFR Permits 15 9 16 1 15 0 1 6 0 7 0 0 70 New Projects in Plan Check 11 87 176 62 23 74 130 100 87 106 49 108 1,013 Number of Permits Finaled 173 209 138 152 196 167 228 208 208 154 100 114 2,047 Photovoltaic Permits 76 48 76 47 70 53 73 44 46 60 32 35 660 Non Construction C of O 31 25 21 28 25 25 21 26 13 29 25 29 298 Tenant Improvements w/ C of O 2 17 16 3 5 9 14 9 8 9 9 11 112 PLANNING Public Hearings 4 2 2 2 5 7 2 4 0 0 3 6 37 Planning Applications 30 41 39 21 35 24 30 33 21 30 39 40 383 Conditional Use Permits 4 4 1 2 0 1 1 4 0 1 0 2 20 Development Plans 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 7 Extensions of Time 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 General Plan Amendments 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Maps 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 Massage Permits 1 5 3 2 4 1 3 0 2 8 7 6 42 Modifications 10 17 21 8 11 10 15 17 10 9 12 13 153 Planned Dev. Overlays 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Secondary Dwelling Unit 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Specific Plans - New 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Specific Plans - Amendments 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Temporary Use Permits 8 0 4 1 4 6 3 5 2 4 4 7 48 LR Applications Initiated 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 5 6 4 4 3 26 Pre -Applications 3 2 5 3 7 3 4 3 7 4 3 3 47 community uevellooment Statistics - Previous 11 iviontns 4/18 5/18 6/18 7/18 8/18 9/18 10/18 11/18 12/18 1/19 2/19 3/19 12 Month Total/Average CODE ENFORCEMENT Code Inspections 285 349 373 256 419 267 320 394 257 361 291 296 3,868 Code Enforcement Cases 155 157 89 126 187 92 148 95 96 132 113 139 1,529 Vehicle Abatement Cases 11 11 9 5 6 5 7 2 0 3 3 2 64 Weed Abatement Cases 12 10 12 17 24 6 5 6 5 9 15 25 146 ADMINISTRATION Visitors to C Desk 1,008 1,057 974 875 1,025 980 1,070 446 370 1,071 870 1,021 10,767 Records Requests Processed 21 16 19 24 13 22 17 14 18 24 15 15 218 My CivicApp Inquiries 94 93 91 83 92 93 107 26 17 65 61 69 891 ECONOMIC INDICATORS Residential - Default 59 57 64 57 55 48 64 58 58 52 45 48 665 Foreclosed Residential 80 80 79 87 80 81 77 73 73 77 87 78 952 Residential REO 45 45 42 36 37 43 44 50 50 51 51 54 548 Commercial - Default 4 6 6 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 39 Commercial - Foreclosed 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 Commercial - REO 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 46 Home Occupations 30 40 33 29 38 25 16 18 20 41 44 37 371 Communlrg Developmend March Perlormance Reporr 2019 Bui ding Inspections 2504 AVG 2000 1656 1500 1000 504 nOTAI 4118 5118 6118 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2119 3119 New Bui ding Permits 300 AV 200 231.5 140 OTAL 0 -- -- --- -- -- -- -- -- -- -41 iM' 4/18 5118 6/18 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2119 3/19 Rnaled Permits 250 AVG 200 170.6 150 100 C�2047 50 4118 5118 6118 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2/19 3119 Planning App icaJons 50 1a _ AlG 40 32 30 z0 C 383 4118 5118 6/18 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2119 3119 Modifications 25 Alf G 20 13 15 10 5 C15 0-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4118 5118 6118 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1/19 2119 3119 Pre -Applications 7 Alf G 5 4 5 4 3 2 C47 1 o - -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- -- -4118 5/18 8118 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2119 3119 Did A pre -application is an informal, free, and helpful tool for ' applicants to receive comments on potential projects. Code EnForeemenr uses 200 _ f AVG 100 C1�5 -- -- -- -- 4118 5118 6118 7118 8118 9/18 10/18 11/18 12/18 1119 2/19 T19 Code EnForcemenr Inspections 500 Alf G 400 322 300 200 C3i8 100 o- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - 4118 5118 6118 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2119 3119 Vehicle Abaremenr Cases 15 r AVG 10 5.3 5 OTA 0--I __ __ ___ __ __ �_________ __�__ __ 64 4118 5118 6118 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2119 3119 FF- - That you can report Code complaints via the City's app? Msirors ro the C Desk 1500 Alf G , 897 loon °° C11-0ij 4118 5118 6118 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2119 3119 Records Requests Processed 25 Alf G 20 'I 8.1 15 10 5 COTAL 4118 5118 6118 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2119 3119 Mg CMcApp Inquiries 150 AVG 74.25 100 54 COTALQ -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- --�-- -- -- - 4118 5118 6118 7118 8118 9118 10118 11118 12118 1119 2119 3/19 r- -1 ` know? The Community Development Desk, or C-Desk, is a one - stop shop for development! ITEM NO . 27 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jodie Gray, Division Chief DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly Report CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire Department Emergency Incident Statistics Shawn C. Newman Fire Chief 4/1/2019 Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department Communications and Technology Division GIs Section Please refer to Map and Incident by Battalion, Station, Jurisdiction Incidents Reported for the month of March,2019 and City of Temecula And Both (Code 2, Alpha, Omega, Code 3, Charlie, Delta, Bravo, Echo) Page 1 of 6 `Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Response Activity Incidents Reported for the month of March,2019 and City of Temecula And Both (Code 2, Alpha, Omega, Code 3, Charlie, Delta, Bravo, Echo) ■ False Alarm 62 8.9% Haz Mat 3 0.4% ■ Medical 495 71.4% 1 ■ Other Fire 2 0.3% ■ Other Misc 7 1.0% 1hoh PAPublic Ser\Ace Assist 30 4.3% ■ Res Fire 1 0.1% . Ringing Alarm 7 1.0% ■ Standby 4 0.6% ■ Traffic Collision 79 11.4% ■ Vehicle Fire 2 0.3% Wldland Fire 1 0.1% Total: 693 100.0% False Alarm 62 Haz Mat 3 Medical 495 Other Fire 2 Other Misc 7 Public Service Assist 30 Res Fire 1 Ringing Alarm 7 Standby 4 Traffic Collision 79 Vehicle Fire 2 Wildland Fire 1 Incident Total: 693 <5 Minutes 479 Average Enroute to Onscene Time* Enroute Time = When a unit has been acknowledged as responding. Onscene Time = When a unit has been acknowledge as being on scene. For any other statistic outside Enroute to Onscene please contact the IT Help Desk at 951-940-6900 +5 Minutes +10 Minutes +20 Minutes Average % 0 to 5 min 209 26 0 4.4 69.1 % *CODE 3 and CODE 2 incidents are included in the total count of incidents and the average Enroute to Onscene Time. Last Updated 4/1/2019 3:C Page 2 of 6 *Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Battalion, Station and Jurisdiction False Alarm Haz Mat Medical Other Fire Other Misc Public Service Res Fire Ringing Alarm Standby Traffic Collisio Vehicle Fire Wildlan d Fire .• Station Pechanga #2 Station 12 Temecula Station 73 Rancho California Station 83 French Valley Station 84 Parkview Station 92 Wolf Creek Station 95 Roripaugh Ranch �I=YIIf-IIPLIU]{al� Grand Total City of Temecula Station Total City of Temecula Station Total City of Temecula Station Total City of Temecula Station Total City of Temecula Station Total City of Temecula Station Total City of Temecula Station Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 0 103 0 1 6 0 0 0 32 1 1 13 0 103 0 1 6 0 0 0 32 1 1 18 0 161 0 1 10 0 1 1 22 0 0 18 0 161 0 1 10 0 1 1 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 13 1 97 2 1 10 1 3 1 14 1 0 13 1 97 2 1 10 1 3 1 14 1 0 17 2 106 0 4 4 0 3 2 7 0 0 17 2 106 0 4 4 0 3 2 7 0 0 1 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 62 3 495 2 7 30 Last Updated 4/1/2019 &C Page 3 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Jurisdiction False Haz Mat Medical Other Other Public Res Fire Ringing Standby Traffic Vehicle Wildlan Alarm Fire Misc Service Alarm Collisio Fire d Fire of Temecula 62 3 495 2 7 30 1 7 4 79 2 1 Last Updated 4/1/2019 &C Page 4 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. Incidents by Supervisorial District - Summary DISTRICT 3 CHUCK False Alarm 62 Haz Mat 3 Medical 495 Other Fire 2 Other Misc 7 Public Service Assist 30 Res Fire 1 Ringing Alarm 7 Standby 4 Traffic Collision 79 Vehicle Fire 2 Wildland Fire 1 Last Updated 4/1/2019 &C Page 5 of 6 Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in. MONTH = 3 and YEAR = 2019 and CITYNAME = "Temecula' q{� Plnsr NN�'o '''�xi-r-f x**Rd # • ; x Buck JW—.. # � t`uq��tei►' .. ` La � Telxrec 9 S001 4# f td4S C t Temecula • • i ..Ilr 8A5/.R �t � (Sk Bkiunl2 � i 5k9kiun F34 QO FClubk `-._.- • S M * PA u S A VA Z E 'Y ,40 d o jf p flan Cla * .'^ -0y •,RECHANGACA5INDfWD.RVL SSE n02 4f 5 Ad aDija k aI �&E:i tin Di \s� f _ X ii A if i LAN A.# 0 i1 j*A i iV 'n �• Legend • Fie Medical Rivers ide County 44Fie Static r Hazard • Other M's o Reservations i Cssinoa RiversideCounty Fire GI S Haz Mat a PSA Last Updated 4/1/2019 3:C Page 6 of 6 'Incidents are shown based on the primary response area for the incident location. This does not represent total response times for all units only the first unit in Pzl Fire Department Temecula Battalion Fire Stations- Public Education Reporting Month Reporting Stations: Total Number of Events for Reporting Month ................................................. 5 March 12, 73, 84, 92 and 95 Reporting Year: 2019 PR and Public Education Programs: Event Type School Event 0 Fire Safety Trailer 2 Other Total Number of Hours Number of Public Contacts: 15 362 2 15 0 0 ................................................:........................................................ 2 0 ................................................:........................................................ 12 142 0 0 2 33 Field Inspections: LE-100's (Weed Abatement) Total Number of Initial Field Total Number of Inspections for Reporting 0 LE-100 Inspections for 0 Month Reporting Month Prevention Referrals: Total Number of Re -inspections for Reporting 0 Total Number of Fire Month Prevention Referrals for 0 Reporting Month Significant Events: Provide a brief synopsis of significant TC's, Fires, Near Drowning's, Road Closures etc... Include photos if available. The Temecula Fire Department ran over 690 calls this month. One of the most significant calls was Engine12 assisting with the car that went off the side of the freeway and landed behind City Hall. Engine 84 assisted with the 1.1 acre fire up in the De Luz area, this fire was quickly contained. The medic program had 3 CPR events one of them included teaching 450 high school students from Great Oak High School hands only CPR. 2019 CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY CEMERGENCY ASS T'OT'RESPONSE, GLASS AND TRAINING TOTALS 2019 Class Totals ��m0oo0mo0o PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING HOURS 2019 Training Hours ITCC Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total TRAINING 96 169 164 429 CERT 0 0 0 0 TEEN CERT 0 0 0 0 INCIDENTIRESPONSE TOTALS FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2019 Incident Response Totals Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total COMMERCIAL FIRE 0 0 0 0 FALSE ALARM 82 83 62 227 HAZ MAT 0 2 3 5 MEDICAL AID 523 527 495 1545 MUTI FAMILY DWELLING 1 0 0 1 OTHER FIRE 5 4 2 11 OTHER MISC. 14 9 7 30 PSA 19 29 30 78 RINGING ALARM 11 7 7 25 RESIDENTIAL FIRE 1 2 1 4 RESCUE 0 6 0 6 STANDBY 5 4 4 13 TRAFFIC COLLISSION 75 77 79 231 VEHICLE FIRE 3 2 2 7 WILDLAND FIRE 0 0 1 1 Total 739 752 693 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2184 FIRE DEPARTMENT CLASS TOTAL COMPARISON 1200 1000 800 .IN o 200 A N MONTH 2O18 YTD 2019 YTD JANUARY 148 98 FEBRUARY 36 43 MARCH 36 48 APRIL 68 MAY 56 JUNE 62 JULY 82 AUGUST 335 SEPTEMBER 36 OCTOBER 99 NOVEMBER 47 DECEMBER 2 TOTAL TO DATE 1007 189 2018 vs 2019 47 J > 0 ell 1�5�k 2018 YTD 2019 YTD �p FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL CALL COMPARISON 2018 vs. 2019 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 0 i... J J J J p�``��� MONTH 2O18 YTD 2019 YTD JANUARY 741 739 FEBRUARY 715 752 MARCH 782 693 APRIL 710 MAY 733 JUNE 707 JULY 753 AUGUST 822 SEPTEMBER 763 OCTOBER 826 NOVEMBER 772 DECEMBER 764 TOTAL TO DATE 9088 2184 2018 YTD 2019 YTD ITEM NO . 28 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 23, 2019 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: http://temeculaca.2ov/270/Capital-Improvement-Projects-CIP ATTACHMENTS: 1. Monthly Report City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Butterfield Stage Road Extension Phase III, PW15-11 Description: Widening of Butterfield Stage Road from La Serena Way to Rancho California Road, which includes widening of Rancho California Road to four lanes through the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road (Riverside County is a partner on this major circulation project). Cost: $6,253,500 Status: Construction contract was awarded in December 2018. Construction is expected to begin in April 2019. French Valley Parkway / Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. Cost: $84,931,401 Status: Currently in design. Work continues on the environmental re-evaluation. California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved reprogramming State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funds. FY 18/19 Citywide Slurry Program, PW18-09 Description: Slurry seal of various streets, primarily residential, located south of Temecula Parkway and generally west of Margarita. Cost: $1,406,372.58 Status: Project is complete. 1 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South. Cost: $51,959,957 Status: Construction is essentially complete. All contract work has been completed. Caltrans is conducting its final reviews of the project. Changes and/or additional work may be required. Additional project details are available on the project website: www.1579South.info Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. Cost: $11,784,550 Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. Request for Authorization of Preliminary Engineering submitted to Caltrans on March 14, 2018. Design consultant has been selected through the RFP process. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the 03/12/2019 meeting. Design is underway. Overland Drive Extension (Commerce Center Drive to West of Enterprise Circle), PW16-06 Description: Construction of the extension of Overland Drive from Commerce Center Drive to Enterprise Circle West. Cost: $8,423,347 Status: Project is complete. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Enterprise Circle West and South, Rider and Commerce Center Drive, PW18-12 Description: Rehabilitation of Enterprise Circle West and South from Winchester Road to Commerce Center Drive, Rider and Commerce Center Drive from Enterprise Circle West to Via Montezuma. Cost: To be determined Status: Anticipate bidding Mid- April with a Mid - May bid opening. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Rancho Vista Road, Paseo Goleta to Butterfield Stage Road, PW19-01 Description: Rehabilitation of Rancho Vista Road from Paseo Goleta to Butterfield Stage Road. Cost: To be determined Status: The project is currently in design. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Ynez Road (Winchester to Date), Equity Drive and County Center Drive Loop, and Winchester Road (Nicolas to Easterly City Limits), PW18-01 Description: Rehabilitation of Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Date Street, Equity Drive and County Center Drive loop, and Winchester Road from Nicolas Road to easterly City Limits. Cost: To be determined Status: Currently on hold awaiting completion of Rancho Water and Developer improvements. Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14 Description: Widening of Pechanga Parkway between Via Gilberto and North Casino Drive. Cost: $5,000,000 Status: Construction contract was awarded in December 2018. Construction started on April 25, 2019. 3 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Roundabout Improvements at Ynez Road, PW18-06 Description This project includes the construction of a traffic circle, roundabout, on Ynez Road at the intersection of La Paz Street. The improvements include the construction of a raised traffic circle with a desert style landscape and a horse monument inside the circle. Cost: $519,824.04 Status: Construction is scheduled to start in April 2019 and will have a 60 — working day schedule. Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also include relocating the access of the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. Cost: To be determined Status: The project is currently in design. Ynez Road Improvements, PW17-17 Description This project includes widening Ynez Road, form Rancho Vista Road to La Paz Street, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscape medians, streetlights and modify the traffic signal at Santiago Road. Cost: $346,480.00 Status: Design has started and at 30% plan status. The design is scheduled to be completed during the FY 2019- 20. M City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Bike Lane and Trail Program — Bike Pump Track, PW 18-04 Description: Bicycle Pump Track at Ronald Reagan Sports Track. Cost: $300,000.00 Status: Project currently in design. Kickoff meeting held on September 7, 2018. Concept plan submitted to the City on October 22, 2018. A Request for Qualification was posted on PlanetBids and interested parties qualifications were due on 04/10/2019. Citywide Streetlight Acquisition and Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit, PW17-18 Description: Phase I of this project is to purchase the Southern California Edison (SCE) owned streetlights within the City's boundary, including the light poles, mast arms, and light fixtures. Phase II of this project includes retrofitting the purchased lights with a Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting system. Cost: $8,172,144 Status: Agreements with SCE have been executed and the Application for Filing with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) was completed. The City received CPUC approval for the acquisition. City is working with Southern California Edison to complete the acquisition. Interstate 15 Branding and Visioning — Conceptual Landscape Corridor Plan, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe. Cost: $3,887,550 Status: City Council approved a design agreement with Michael Baker International at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Design is underway. 6i City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Library Parking — Phase II, PW13-09 Description: Design and construction of an expansion of the current on -site parking facility. Cost: $2,872,969 Status: Bids were opened on February 28, 2019. Awarded a construction contract on March 26, 2019. Construction is expected to begin in April 2019. Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21 Description: Construction of a new recreation center in Margarita Community Park in place of the former YMCA building. Includes demolition of the existing building and pool, and construction of a new building, as determined by a feasibility study. Phase II includes the design and construction of an expansion of the current on -site parking facility. Cost: $4,882,963 Status: Design consultant selection for preparation of concept plans and bridging documents is complete. At the February 26, 2019 meeting, City Council approved an agreement with NV5, Inc. Old Town Parking Structure, PW17-15 Description: Design and eventual construction of a new parking facility in Old Town. The Old Town Parking Management Plan will outline a number of parking strategies best suited to serve Old Town Temecula. Cost: $1,000,000 Status: Parking study is being updated. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail. Cost: $4,891,353 Status: Design is being finalized and the environmental document has been initiated. The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State S131 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. Currently processing application for Caltrans Streamlined Oversite and Encroachment Permit/Plan Check with Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC). Anticipate design to be completed in June of 2019. Sidewalks - Old Town Improvement Project, PW17-04 Description: This project is on the east side of Mercedes Street from Sam Hicks Park to Fourth Street. This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. Cost: $477,577 Status: Construction is complete. Punch list items are being addressed. Sidewalks - Sixth Street Improvements, PW17-05 Description: This project includes adding new sidewalks on the north side of Sixth Street between Mercedes Street and Mary Phillips Senior Center. Cost: $150,595 Status: Construction is complete. Punch list items are being addressed. 7 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Sidewalks — Citywide (Third Street), PW17-24 Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side of Third Street, between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street and the west side of Mercedes Street from Third Street for approximately 150' to the north. Portion adjacent to the proposed parking structure for the hotel will be completed by private developer. Cost: To be determined Status: Design is almost complete. Project cannot be constructed until the Truax Hotel parking structure is under construction due the change in street grade. Sidewalks — Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement, PW17-16 Description: Replace boardwalk plank boards with colored concrete sidewalk. Cost: $700,000 Status: At the 12/12/2017 meeting, the City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized staff to bid the project for construction. Public bids were opened on 06/26/2018. At the 08/14/2018 City Council meeting all bids were rejected and authorization to re -advertise for public bids was received. Project is expected to be advertised for bids shortly. Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highlands to Tierra Vista. Cost: $198,920.00 Status: Project currently in design. Temecula Park and Ride, PW06-09 Description: Design and construction of a park and ride facility in the vicinity of Temecula Parkway and La Paz Street. Cost: $2,764,093 Status: Construction is Complete. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Teen Village, PW17-23 Description: Design and construct 6,820 square foot central building at the Community Recreation Center in Ronald Reagan Sports Park. Cost: $8,667,930 Status: Initiating planning and design. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS Community Recreation Center (CRC) Pool Site Enhancements and Renovations, PW18-02 Description: Removal and replacement of pool decking, pool re -plaster, and installation of an enhanced lighting system with energy efficient LED fixtures. Cost: $1,538,880 Status: The City Council approved an agreement for design at the 08/28/2018 meeting. Public bids were opened on December 11, 2018. City Council awarded the contract at the 01/08/2019 meeting. Construction started January 23, 2019 and is planned to be completed by May 15, 2019. Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site. Cost: $1,280,284 Status: Design is complete. Preparation of the environmental document is underway. Construction anticipated in 2019. Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Skate Park, Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park, Paloma Del Sol Park, Temeku Hills Park, and Harveston Lake Park. Cost: $347,800 Status: Initiating planning and design. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued) Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of the restroom building expansion, including adding stalls and urinals. It also includes renovating the snack bar, enlarging the storage case; and the renovation of the north/south baseball restroom and snack bar building by installing a new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements. Cost: $725,000 Status: Initiating planning and design Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Enhancement, PW12-20 Description: Design and construct a new innovative play area to replace the existing equipment. Cost: $648,888 Status: Currently on hold. 11 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS 76 and Circle K Fueling Facility Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 5,712 square foot convenience store and automotive service station Temecula Parkway and Pechanga Parkway. Status: Permit issued August 30, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Hilton Garden Inn Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 66,991 square foot, three-story, 104 room Hilton Garden Inn Hotel with underground parking and additional off -site parking located approximately north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. Status: Ongoing review of project by the Land Development division. Margarita and De Portola Road Description: Grading Plan to allow for the construction of a two-story 18,621 square foot office building. Status: Permit issued December 21, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Mexico Cafe Description: Grading plan and Street Improvement Plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 13,375 square foot Mexico Cafe restaurant south of the Temecula Parkway and Pechanga Parkway intersection. Status: Permit issued September 13, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. 12 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued) Old Town (Fourth Street and Front Street) Description: Grading Plan to allow for the construction of a three-story shell building on the northeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Fourth Street. Status: Permit issued April 25, 2017. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Old Town (Sixth Street and Front Street) Description: Chaparral South — grading plan to add 6,657 square feet to an existing two story retail/office commercial structure located at 28475 Old Town Front Street. Status: Permit issued January 28, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Raising Cane's Description: Grading Plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 3,935 square foot Raising Cane's drive-thru restaurant located at 40390 Margarita Road. Status: Permit issued October 23, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Rancho Soleo (Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road) Description: Grading plan to allow for the final map and construction of a 245 unit multi -family development. Status: Permit issued October 16, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. 13 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued) Sommers Bend (formerly Roripaugh Ranch) Description: Land Development oversight of the following submittals in plan check: Final Map reviews, Community Sports Park Improvement Plan, Sommers Bend — Rough Grading Plan; Street Improvement Plan; Storm Drain Improvement Plan; Street Light Plan; Signing & Striping Plan. Status: Permit issued September 27, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Starbucks Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 1,850 square foot drive-thru Starbucks located in the Palomar Village Shopping Center at 30690 Rancho California Road. Status: Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Staybridge Suites Description: Grading plan to allow for an approximately 90,832 square foot, 4-story, 125 room Staybridge Suites hotel located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue. Status: Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. 14 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 23, 2019 MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing, PW17-12, PW17-13, PW17-14 Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks. Cost: $750,000 Status: Agreements have been executed with Miracle Recreation for Riverton Park, Rotary Park, and Temeku Hills Park. Temeku Hills Park safety surfacing construction scheduled to begin April 10, 2019. Rotary Park and Riverton Park playground equipment replacement scheduled to begin in May and July respectively. Sports Court Resurfacing Description: Repairs and resurfacing of sport court surfacing at various parks and facilities. This includes tennis courts, basketball courts, and hockey rinks at various parks. Cost: $100,000 Status: Agreement scheduled for City Council approval at the April 23, 2019 City Council meeting. Sports Field Lighting — Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion Description: Replacement of aging sports field lighting components with new LED technology at various sports parks. Cost: $250,000 Status: A cooperative contract purchase agreement with Musco for equipment purchase was executed. Installation pending competitive bid process. Installation anticipated June 2019. 15 REQUESTS TO SPEAK AND DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD "F "„, REQUEST TO SPEAK It CITY OF TEMECULA aise 1989 Date: if 1 2 Lf I wish to speak on: 4i.1640.01_ X Public Comment Circle O : CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: 0 l -;-71/C- w L '-T V G.,e Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the recor � � Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. �; REQUEST TO SPEAK Ai ffffisOP ., CITY OF TEMECULA \ 1989 S1 Date: 4 a:3 I wish to speak on. 1 / Public Comment Circle On : CITY COUNCIL/ SD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject:I J Agenda Item No. I 1 For [Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the re d.^ Va----‘e_AitniiQ �jName LVL� �� Phone Number: Address: ` If you are representing anorganization or group, pi ae se give the narpp: v '\/ kj 9 \ 0( c(b( / Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes blic record. All information provided is optional. `,�� "• �';° F"" � REQUEST TO SPEAK 7,, :talP ,v CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 s. J -�3 Date �j'� 1 9 I wish to speak on: \I„6Public Comment Circle On Y COUNCI /CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: Agenda Item No 1 / For Against X Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name. TiOr ` err , i eeNn J\ak cri- t ( Email address: '"- If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK 4, CITY OF TEMECULA Zir1989 0, Date: - 3�� I wish to speak on: 0 Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: \v � ksioLo �0.k ��-2 p/ O� A Q Agenda Item No. ellutik, For Against c Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.y � Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: (Le.,) L (Nk,^,,I,,_<3- Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. .:'of TFM1'�'_ ,� REQUEST TO SPEAK r CITY OF TEMECULA 'y r,. " ... Date: 1 //49 V/9 I wish to speak on: 1 1i( Public Comment Circle One CITY COUNCIL/CSD/ SARDA/THA/TPFA,-- ) Subject: I _ !' 1 p,ciJ —Ykt tlLt/y/-(--f-✓ I Q' /Agenda Item No. 1-1 For 1/ Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior, to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. s. YYI � Name: ��..� j:::.„7,„ (.(�4"-- Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: mirmil Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK ffrriFII4,1 CITY OF TEMECULA )00 1989) Date: }}}} I wish to speak on: I`" I/ Public Comment Circle One. CITY COUNCIL/ CSD /SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: 1/ Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items liste on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. \V Name: � ��`� Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Ccd 01411 J Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. "' i REQUEST TO SPEAK (9 t-< lk. CITY OF TEMECULA .0 ivx9 Date: /—// J ? 9 I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One CITY COUNCI /CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: Agenda Item No. For IA Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. i �/} Name: �II ► ( I e/I Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing n organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA l 1989 �3 /( Date: I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One. CITY COUNCIL/ CSD /SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: glee(Per / LJ - Agenda Item No. n For 7] Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. y� Name: !'hckfAt-(, e Phone Number: Address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. "'` REQUEST TO SPEAK iA`\ .jam �i CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 - Date: 0_---e, 1 \ c\ I wish to speak on: n Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: tA. Agenda Item No. For N Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. �� r��d. • Name: c-. .\CO- MANS-L Phone Number: Address: Email address: \ If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: k } \JO\ Qc.-- 0 \`.e.r•---J Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK .,. CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: 4-1- Agenda Item No. . For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. > Name: �/�v`/ �%, uLic3 S Phone Number: - Address: ¢ k/2'‘� Email address- � -►-� If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK ijop ., CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/ CSD /SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: Agenda Item No. 3 For Against [� Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: c_1G,-)I1 Wit= S---Xq Phone Number: Address: / C,71. Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. IF"`', REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA17 ria Date: �C i/I c I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/ CSD / SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: • Agenda Item No. —2-3 For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. � Name. 411 5)VG`/t- `Z Phone Number: Address: . ^ Email address: — If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. "' iF"'`,, REQUEST TO SPEAK i A� lite> ., CITY OF TEMECULA ti 1989 "" Date: It)23 L V / 9 r I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: 1 t Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. t I Name: 1 �� �� c..( L - Lk �t c ) Phone Number Address: I --2.....ti.� , .,. ( 4 Email address: � If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. `�, REQUEST TO SPEAK 01PP ' Z ,,_ CITY OF TEMECULA 41,,„f ..,. . ? 1989 Date.23 /Vrli cQ/Cj I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: y� Agenda Item No. 2 I For Against (� Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing tha ' m. On a the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Li'ar\ Name: U' i wa'r- CD ./Lt� ( I✓ Phone Number: `// Address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. °`i t"`' REQUEST TO SPEAK fpo, .►j,����,4" CITY OF TEMECULA 1 1989 - Date: 4423ailill I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: IX Agenda Item No. D3 For Against X Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: (Sseeki Via r, Phone Number: Address: allul Email address: ( If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. °"F''t��, REQUEST TO SPEAK A Am" +„ CITY OF TEMECULA t ... 1 \ 1989 r 0 .... Date:�� f......Scaoi? I wish to speak on: ——-— Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL I CSD I SARDA I THA I TPFA Subject: Agenda Item No. c., 2) For AgainstK„_,/,,,,,j - -Iimid-mditrilli5 - - __ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: 1 / L OAS Phone Number: � -' CA- Address: (� 7_g � Y] A �T� �� l -- / Email address. If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. ---.. � REQUEST TO SPEAK p II_P 4 CITY OF TEMECULA q. 'q, 1989 ,e'''' Date: /,,, /, I wish to speak on: M. Public Comment Circle On : CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA # _ % Subject: ��oL(��oJiJ l �---- Agenda Item N %%.`" For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name. r'--1\ �� yr^J Phone Number: Address: / / /t�-t ECUL � �1`- p S�a-- Email address: -- If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. `,,.�°�'F""�'�; REQUEST TO SPEAK pr I CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: / /./ /O 7,- I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/SARDA/THA/TP A Subject: L //l/ 49/ 1 v , .ilt .r/ ;, Agenda Ite No f For Against XXP?O lv 0' / Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name 1 for the record. ,, / Name: c./,7 4 a ,0 vv /7 1-� Phone Number: / /" Address: ?/ ,, 7�-PIZi/ . ( it 7675t7 Email address: ( .." 4 If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: d 71, q- vC� 'n7G"t a/-7 / v(-' Please note that all information presented at a ity Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. °F'tt`tr,�, REQUEST TO SPEAK • CITY OF TEMECULA `1989 0- Date: I wish to speak on. Publi Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/ SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: Agenda Item Nq�9.3 For Against V Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the rec?rV. ' -�-�-�/) Address: Email address: ' If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. IF �% REQUEST TO SPEAK U Ij�w�� .,. CITY OF TEMECULA \ -// Date. �jVfyy I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: TY COU /CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: � , /,,9 Agenda Item No. .LcL For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. O�ce the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the • •i •. Address: / /0 Y ( 2 Email address: If you are representing an organizat or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. ,�,0f7F1lyr,` REQUEST TO SPEAK �' yo �, CITY OF TEMECULA � y ,r "; 1,89 -,` r 1 *4'.r tr.Sw oe I` Date: 1 1• i I wish to speak on n Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: 1 ..,Q,c-&—e- A �i nAgenda Item No. For Against 'f Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. �� 10 06 Name' C'1,\k1 da) 1, 0 t_k_vv...k_e� S" Phone Number. Address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. ,��°"F'"<<; REQUEST TO SPEAK P., ij �* CITY OF TEMECULA 1< Date: Lt/23A 9 I wish to speak on: ICJ Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: td4 {\ 419 0. , q Agenda Item No �' ' For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. l �r i (� §�.((�(( Address: `- � � T-eot eca Email address. If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name. Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. `,��°�TF''R'ee REQUEST TO SPEAK 4, CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 �,< 2 / Date: I wish to speak on: I vt Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: CO .r 7 i 7t- o e 0'1 f� C Agenda Item No. c� For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: Q lit/ s Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. `s;of'F"Fr'%,, REQUEST TO SPEAK 1"4/0" , CITY OF TEMECULA n 'It 7 - I* N, 1989 J J Date: .V. (/ [ I wish to speak on: I yrPublic Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject. -�� # 2.3 Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: ARTTUAZ 4O e. Phone Number: Address:Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK 101111P CITY OF TEMECULA ,D 1989 - q/ /2Date: / I/r I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: ,t 4ic & " 5 U l//-d 1)-1 Agenda Item No. 27 For Against I/ I Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. I `/ Name: W l I Ll Ul OA E t > y � Phone Number: Address: CA- 9 25is 2 Email address: ( If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. "�'' REQUEST TO SPEAK '' 19 ., CITY OF TEMECULA N g' 1989 - Date: 1 0 I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/ CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record Name: 1 v`-I ll/ 1 Vuk I - Phone Number: Address: If you are repres nting an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. ii i,�''� REQUEST TO SPEAK ,1L-2 4,. CITY OF TEMECULA IQ] 451 Date: 01//,* I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: /T'',S / 9 Agenda Item No. 23 For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. ) Address: Email address: /' If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK rA\ •ij .�, CITY OF TEMECULA 2` Z` 1989 Date: 4-( (�_. /20/ wish to speak on: n Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: tic Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record./� � / )/J Address: - _ Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK Z�i f 9/11110" ., CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: 7/2 3/� I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: t\q---Agenda Item No. 2 3 For Against n Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. ) / Address: Email address: -- If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK itto ., CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: iqpf;) 3 dbl I wish to speak on: n Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL/CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: Agenda Item No. -D-3 For n Against 171 Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. ,� r Address: ++ Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. ��, REQUEST TO SPEAK � ift �O 4; CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 - / ' Date: `7 ,K 3 I wish to speak on: [/ Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL /CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: lt.►' Agenda Item No. > For ,i Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. /� / J� Name: (-)A �� �l 5 5 Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK i 4,1 CITY OF TEMECULA ly=3Date: I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL /CSD / SARDA/THA/TPFA Subject: I�d Agenda Item No. � For Against r- Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: L /, I Phone Number: Address: � Email address: _ ��., (--- If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Bill Frisbie April 23, 2019 Dear Temecula City Council Members, My name is Bill Frisbie. I am retired and a resident and voter in Temecula. My comments refer to the resolution that has been presented for your vote concerning "Socialism/Communism", which I have read. First of all, this resolution serves no legislative purpose. All public officials already swear an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, so I have to question why you are considering such a resolution. I am old enough to remember the McCarthy era in which anyone could have their lives and reputation ruined by being branded a communist. People were required to sign loyalty oaths and were encouraged to label associates as communists. The current resolution looks, sounds and smells a lot like those loyalty oaths. In my experience,whenever a public figure drapes him or herself in the flag in this manner, he is either a scoundrel or doing the work (knowingly or not) of one. The whole purpose of this resolution seems to me to be an exercise in bullying council members into taking a hard line position against any citizens, candidates or policies that could be labeled "socialist". The language of the resolution makes this intent clear, raising as it does the specter of the overthrow of our constitutional government. Most likely, the opposed policies include measures to reform the way health care is paid for, and tax and other economic policies. As a retiree, I depend on Social Security and Medicare to avoid financial ruin. Both policies were loudly criticised as "socialist" when they were proposed, mostly by the monied classes and the politicians who were beholden to them. Fortunately for me and most older people, conditions in this country had become so dire that these measures passed, and are now supported by the vast majority of citizens. In my own case, on my 65th birthday I fainted due to a condition requiring the installation of a cardiac pacemaker, which keeps me alive today. Without Medicare I might have had to delay this operation, as the expense would have been very heavy. Many people nowadays are in the lamentable condition of having to choose between food and needed medicine. The United States is practically the only developed country in the world where a person may go bankrupt due to a medical emergency. If preventing that condition requires a "socialist" solution, I think that is an acceptable course of action. Please vote down this deplorable bit of political posturing and get on with the business you were elected to do. Most sincerely, Bill Frisbie Temecula City Council Meeting, April 22, 2019 Comments from Jim LAVERTY: I am here as an individual citizen and not the representative of any group. -Donald Trump announced his candidacy for President on June 16, 2015. He did so by creating a false picture of immigration as a threat and a danger, at a time when immigration was at a 10 year low having gone down each year for 10 years in a row. He lied. -Fast forward to 2018 - Trump was implementing policies which were separating families of asylum seekers, and he says that those who don't agree with his policy are for"open borders." This is both Illogical and another lie. It's illogical because the policy of separating families is on the extreme right side of the political spectrum. The policy of open borders is on the extreme left. Do you know how many political positions there could be between separating families and the political center? Let alone from the political center to the extreme left, and open borders? It just doesn't hold water! -in June of 2018 City Council proposed a proclamation reaffirming that the City of Temecula was not a sanctuary city. -I participated by asking the City Council to "look at the data." When all of the speakers were finished and the council leaders spoke, I finally realized that we were all being played. The council leadership announced it was favoring the national law over the state law, and it was also concerned for "safety". -It was then that I realized what the Council was really doing- extending the President's frame of the immigration issue based on lies and spurious logic. -Fast forward to 2019 and the President calls his political foes "socialists", which as before with the immigration issue, is both illogical and based on a lie. And now the City Council is AGAIN trying extend another false and illogical framing of another issue. So here is what I say: - Stop treating the people of Temecula as if we're stupid. We're not stupid. - Stop treating the people of Temecula as if we're not knowledgeable of the issues. We know the issues. - Stop lying to us as if we don't know what you're doing. We know what you're doing. - Stop trying to play us. We won't stand for it. One other request: Representative Mark Meadows, N.C., RECENTLY became morally incensed when a colleague accused him of performing a racist act, when actually he committed a racist act in front of everyone. So Please don't act morally incensed because I accused you of perpetuating a lie, when actually you've been exposed for perpetuating a lie. Thank you. James Laverty