Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTract Map 23561 Parcel 11 WQMP SanbornPrbiect Specific Water Quality Management A Template for r an ,a Margarita Region Project Title.- Sanborn Avenue Parking Lot Pevellopment No; Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1 Design Review/Case No: PA17-1642/LD18-1180 Preparedfor Compliance with Regional Board Order No. R9-2010-0016 Prepared for: Paul and Andy Lauba h 183 Cad's Magdalena, Suite 100 Encinitas, California92024 Prepared by: Ventura Engineering Inland 27393'Ynez Rd, suite 159' Temecula, California92562 (95'1) 252-76 Project Specific Water Quality ManagementPlan A Template for preparing Project .Specific WQMPs for Priority Development ,Projects located within the Beaus Margarita Region of Riverside Bounty', Project Title: Sanborn Avenue Parking Lot Development No: Lot 11 of Parcel blip 23561-1 Design Review/Case No: PA17-1642/LD18-1180 Original Date Prepared:October. Preparedfor Compliance p ff pp Prepared for: Paul and Andy Laubach 183 Calle Magdalena, Suite 100 Encinitas, California 92024 Prepared by: Ventura Engineering inland 27393 Ynez Rd, suite 159 Temecula California 92562 (95 ) 252-7632 OWNER'S CERTIFICATION This Project' -Specific WQMP has been prepared for Paul and Andy Laubach by Ventura Engineering Inland for the development of the Lot,'1.1 Parking„Lot project located at the NWC of Sanborn and Madison in Temecula, California 90 This WQMP is intendedto comply with the requirements of the City of Temecula for Ordinance 8.28,500 which, includes the,, requirement for the preparation and implementation of a Project -Specific 'iVQMP', The undersigned, while owning the property/project described In the preceding paragraph, shall be responsible for the implementation and funding of this WQMP and will ensure that this WQMP is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site. In addition,, the property owner accepts responsibility for interim operation and maintenance of Storm Ater Best Management Practices until such time as this responsibility Is formally transferred' to a subsequent owner; This WQMP will be reviewed with the facility operator, facility supervisors, employees,' tenants, maintenance and service contractors, or any other party (or parties)' having responsibility for implementing portions of this WQMP'. At least one copy of this WQrvIP will be maintained at the project site or project office in perpetuity. The undersigned is authorized to certify and to approve implementation of this WQMP. The undersigned' is aware that Implementation of this WQMP is enforceable under City of Temecula Water Quality "Ordinance ('Municipal Code Section .28. 00)e "i, the undersigned, certify under penalty of law 'that the provisions of this WQMP have been reviewed and accepted' and that the r QNU',` it be transferred to future successors in interest." 14: Oy, ar}s Signature Date G Owner's Printed Name Owner's Tit e/Positiors PREPARER"S CERTIFICATION "The selection, sizing and design of'stormwater treatment and other stormwater'quality and quantity control' Best' Management Practices in this plan meet the requirements' of Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. 119 2010-0016 and any subsequent amendments thereto." # 1 July 2, 201'' ......::::« Preparer's Signature Date , Wilfredo S.D. Denture Preparer's Printed Name Preparer's Title/Position Preparer's Licensure SaD No, 66532 w Exp, 6 30-18 C1 AL Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lest 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA now Section A: Project and Site Information .,..r ..............................Y .nnrwr.,,nn„vr i .{.., tr44.tr,,d:..>>333 .Y. 3nnnrirt44<a.ii,Y 6 A.1. Maps and Site Plans................>r3.:, : xn..v.,. aw{Rn..;}YYYYi...... in.>.Y4af(..)hY>aT<.KK K.).; a .r.r rr...x x,r>>>tt...rrrr. [ A,2 Identify Receiving Waters ................... >hh_ _ w4(i.).:Y. 7 A.3 Drainage System Susceptibility to Hydromodification ...........r di„r >,a..a . _ A.4 Additional Permits/Approvals required for the Project .. _ 4 _ eat. rr 8 Section Bn Optimize Site Utilization (LID Principles) ..Kr 44 4 3 <x;Yrd.9 Section Ce Delineate Drainage Management Areas (DMAs)............. x.vwwi vvv954i ..%>YS444ffi[Kx YYYdead<[Kv.r,e:10. SectionD, Implement LID l3MPs...a.nn,.Y4tr4(a.}YYY.Ytr4i<fK(iK,..)h).a;<xT.rTr.., )xx,wrY „a{xr .>rttrt<. rr>33t .,.w.vw rxRR3,.,,ww,s<Kn..Y„wa. � DA Infiltration Applicability a x.,'...n., wrrr,>,a,Tnrrrao-a444aa..n thhte4TT ya .,.a.,i kr. 1.2 D:,2 Harvest and Use Assess mentnnnri 1 D.3 Bioretention and Biotreatment Assessment-..........Kr.rrt333t.i.Kir YraknKKvv.r,nn4nnnK rv,.s3,inn,.:ri44 ii.<ii ,1 D.4 Other Limiting Ge otechnical Conditions ..... vs......nri YS i{s.,w hY44iiri l++stsan4Sirr Tv er) v4{.) .YY 4<i 18 D.5 Feasibility Assessment Summaries • 4"&i, rrvr>.rn a.trr<a«,rrrr3t3k4SSa !!.. 1. D.6 LID BIVIP Sizing a<i.wr.rt>344ki ir.r. ,nnnnK...v..rwvt {ann .r 444i.i ri 19 Section E. Implement Hydrologic Control BMPs and Sediment Supply 'MP`s .ai.{inn rrw44ii<[iKsh>,; 4rrrT 23' EA Onsite Feasibility of Hydrologic Control BMPs.............. ;fi iiK.Error! ' Bookmark riot defi e x E'.2 Fleeting the HI` 1P Performance Standard for Small Project Sites iiii 4<ti R E'.3 Hydrologic Control BMP Selection . ,, r. .. 44aS:i. v. ; 2 E'.4 Hydrologic Control RI` IP Sizing. ....... v44 2 E'.5 Implement Sediment SupplyBMPls................. i, 4k4i.ii, ,k 4vvt:{iiri.,FTh <<rr r,3xxxn: 25' Section F: Alternative Compli'ance......,, 3knb, v4,a { 4�-0ii rrY 2 . F',1 identify Pollutants of Concern ..............[r.Y,w�.}a:¢4iii ._._ ,trtr¢:<:: • r .:4.:.; ._ w4fiii::''.i. _.,t xTr..a: .r 29 F.2 Stormwater Credits .ssxwM:wYv}5+:944,iiYt}.}444++r r'.ii.'yrtran3nn:nnaK a4'm. 4.i -0v a, •,w iY4S4G-0. is •t>h.+w.:'a rsv.,'i':Y xwrrl.ro ♦raxx x..vwvvavvv{ ... ,'s94: 4i K.+... 30 F.3 Sizing Criteria. ...... „............. i-0ii6.•• .ssh:h+aSTTrrvery v v4ii 6tr4i ii Sr +44fi tit wr Ki6i{ yl� f ,T Treatment Control BMP Selection ...... xr xe.evvd 4s ,.i'.i .<nr r.Ya444{.SiSrr' r xkk ..... F'.5 Hydrologic Performance Standard ® Alternative Compliance Approach.......;a. ,aa.. „Yr..<.{i 30' F'.6 Sediment Supply Performance Standard - Alternative Compliance.............;..Rrrr.... ..30 Section : Source Control 31':. Section H; Construction Plan Checklist .................. a.Axnn .................. 32 Section I; Operation, Maintenance and Funding. F" t,,. Srrv44- _ 4,..4,.,:�rYY.Y..,<:k«„i _ wK , 33' Acronyms, Abbreviations and Definitions ,.,—....... ,,,•. 34.45:Sr t w44{<: x,,Y trio<<<«..............34 Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot'' Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA List of'Tables ' t.=,,,;..#z>.. ,,,..,:, FAs+a a:i:.,,,a>as.r,a {.;,}-Ae>A..<ee rsr F>+ �#�vi.* Table A.1 Identification of Receiving Waters.. 7" Table A.2Identification of Susceptibility to Hydromodificatio'n. .8 Table A.3' Other Applicable Permits ,,,, r mtt,,. ,t r ........rr.r.,....r,.v4at,,,iR..,.Yp#.<itt„<.>>,A,Aa<<i.�...... Table C.1' DIVA Classifications. Table C.2' Type "A', elf -Treating Areas 10 Table C.3' Type PR', Self -Retaining Areas _............ -s- Table C.4 Type 'C', Areas that Drain to Self-RetainingAreas............................,.,.........a Table C.5' Type' ', Areas [gaining to BMPs ............................. Table D.1 Infiltration Feasibility.....................a........................... 13 Table D.2 Geotechnical'Concerns for Onsite Retention Table Table D.3 LID Prioritization Summary Matrix ................................ . fra,,. v4i, Table ®,r,4 DCV Calculations for LICE BIVIPs Y„A,¢ , ##,,;¢ ........ Yvp,t,,.;YY.<to.:...Y.,¢�a,.at,; YY ¢a<�{rr _ a�rtr o 1{' Table D..5 LID i. MP Sizing.... -....trv#vs s? nnrrrvvsuu, nr r554vssiu i 4344v6{{ Y}:Y?bLLrr.:u YF <2 Table E.1 LID & Hydromodification BMP' Location,....rp..;„ .. _ r Errod Bookmark not de n.ed.; Table F.1 Potential Pollutants by Land Use Type.....}}FAa-0p< tt _ AA.¢.tt _.A in,F.r ii.i ..:>FFA4.{t:,;.2'3 Table F.2' Stormwater Credits ................................................ ttt,, , iYY A6,,4in,° <s+ii .YY ,, A{irr ,A: <rr<...,; 30 Table G.1 Structural and Operational Source Control BMP.., 3 ' Table H.1 Construction Plan Cross-reference .............................Y 32 List of Appendices Appendix 1: Maps and Site Plans.......,nn...qt....nrsss>.Faa<,o,.,,r..Y,.",<i.{. 4 Appendix 2: Construction Plapsa .,Mnii {vt,thnn..p¢t 6A4i,i YYYtFA,4li{{i.#}, 42' Appendix 3: Soils Information.............r Appendix 4: historical Site Con ditions__,,r„...;e �..,t,.�,F .....t..;ii,rnF..A 44 Appendix 5: LID Infeasibility.. Appendix 6: BMP Design Details, a,. Appendix 7: I°° Iydromodification....... 47 Appendix 8. Source Control ............... w eerrr+ n,}., e,rrvvdf4i SSirF„}}AAi{i ttAAfil .. rtt4try YA+ n vp, . Y .."i:. ttunry K} ..v "ti Appendix 9, O&M o ix,,, i.,e.e <ecci rt .,. ..... . F 49 Appendix 10: Educational Material's43' f Water Quality ManagementPlan List 11 Parking Lot Lot.: o Parcel Map f .:.35' .. PA_ Section A: Project and Site Information Type of Project': Commercial Planning Area: Not Applicable' Community Name: Temecula' Development NamNotApplicahle PR JET COCA, ION Latitude & Longitude (DMS); 331 31' 32.35" N by 117010° 3'.40"'+ Project'' Watershed and Sub -Watershed: Santa Gertrudis Creek to Murrieta Creek to Santa Margarita River to Santa Margarita Lagoon to Pacific Ocean AsPN (s) . 910m272-011' PROAUCHARACTEMSTICS Proposed or potential land use(s) _ - - Commercial Proposed or Potential SIC Code(s) N/A Area of Impervious Project Footprint' (SF) 0' Total area of rid Impervious Surfaces within the Project Limits (S'F)/or'Repla'cement' 35,049 Total Project Area (ac),, 56,394 Does the project consist of offsite road improvements'? Y' Z N' Cedes the project propose to construct unpaved roads?" [J Y ® N'' Is the project part of a larger common plan of development' (phased project)'? [] ' ® N Is the project exempt from HMP Performance Standards? ' [J y', ® N,', U1 TIN SITE C ARA TE CsT.I Total area of existing Impervious Surfaces within the project limits (SF) 0 Is the project located within any Multi -Species Habitat Conservation 'Plan '(MSHCP Criteria Y' ® N Cell? If see identify the Cell number: N/A Are there any natural hydrologic features on the project site? Y N Is a Geotechnical Report attached? Y N, If no Geotech, Report, list the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) soils type(s) A., C' present on the site (A, 0,'C and'/or 0)' What is the dater Quality Design Storm Depth for the project? ' 0,8'92' Water ) dual ty Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel flap 23561-1, PAS' A.1 Mapsand Site Plans Use your discretion on whether or not you may reed t® create multiple sheets or can appropriately accommodate these features On one or two sheets. Keep in mind that the Copermittee plan reviewer'' must be able to easily analyze your Project utilizing this template and its associated site plans and maps. )Using Table A.1 below, fist in order Of upstream to downstream, the Receiving Waters that the Project site is tributary to, Continue to fill each row with the Receiving Water"s '303(d) listed impairments (if any), designated Beneficial Uses, and proximity, if any, to a RARE Beneficial Use. Include a reap of the Receiving Waters In Appendix 1 # t'y t3 eif1 t WPpprved Limit esi#ted Rficil Ipii�vnts Reefal uses Pesticides (Chlorpyrifos), Metals/IVletalloids Santa Oertrudis Crank (Copper, iron, Manganese), Fecal Indicator Bo UN, AGR, IND, PROC, GWR, REC1, �/ 902.42 Bacteria (E,Coli, Fecal Coliform, Nutrients REC2, WARM, WILD (Phosphorus) M�rrleta Creek.: Pesticides (Chlorpyrifos), Meta Is/Metall�aids fsditJlU, ,4Ci�, It~iD, PROC, REC1, REC2, 902,g2 (Copper, Iron, Manganese), Nutrients WILD N/A (Nitrogen, Phosphorus), ToxicityWARM, Santa Margarita River Upper Reach Nutrients (Phosphorous), Toxicity M UN, AGR, INN, RECI, REC2, N/A WARM,COLD, WILD, RARE 902.22 Santa Margarita River Pathogens (Enterococcus Bacteria, Fecal Ie>ILIi'�&, AIR, INi3, PROC, REC1, REC2, Lower Reach COliform), Nutrients (Total Nitrogen, WARM, COLD, iiUIL[3 RARE , N/A, 902.21, 902.12 Phosphorus, total Nitrogen as N ")"� ) Santa Margarita Lagoon Nutrient (E�irophacatac�n) REC1, REC2, BIOL, WILD, RARE, 902..11 MAR, WARM INN, NAV, REC1, REC2, COMM, Pacific Ocean Shoreline' Not Listed At This Time BIOL, WILD, RARE, MAR, AQUA, N/A MICR, SPWN, SHELL Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA Using Table A.2 below, list in order of the point of discharge at the project site down to the Santa Margarita River, each drainage system or receiving water that the project site is tributary to. Continue to fill each row with the material of the drainage system, the storm drain susceptibility using the SWCT2 (Stormwater & Water Conservation Tracking Tool - 11ttp.,J'rhjq ) or Map 2 of the Hydromodification Susceptibility Documentation Report and Mapping: Santa Margarita Region (Appendix D of the SMR HMP), and the condition for exempting the drainage system, if applicable. If the exemption includes receiving waters that were not evaluated in Appendix D, provide supporting documentation in Appendix 7 to demonstrate that they classify as Engineered, Fully Hardened and Maintained (EFHM) channels, consistent with the definition provided in Appendix D. Include a map exhibiting each drainage system and the associated susceptibility in Appendix 1. Tabie A,2 J; ....................�... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... .D....... ..ito. ..e. ................... .............3.. ......................................................................................*.. .......'............D...........:................................... .....................................................*................................................... ...... .......................................................................................................................... .... .......................................................................................... ................................................... .. ... ................I................................................................................................... ........... ......................................................................................................... ...... .. ... ......d............................. ......... ........ . .. ...... .... . .....................a................................. .................................I............ .....................t....................................e.... ...............................�............. ...........................s. .................n...................................... ...3... ...... ...... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... .... .�...i... ..........:.......*..........g........................................e................................. ... ... ... ... ...y . ........ . . . . . .. . ... ... ......i.. .......... ufteptiblftri::: .*.. ....... :......:..... :...I.. f... :..... .i.. :..... ........iU. .a......:...... .d:. .............. ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........................... .............. .... ...... ..... ...... .................................................. ....................... I....x : �.. I.... - I....:...I....:...I....:...I....:...I....:...I....:........:... ..I......: .. .. -... :... I.... :.... ..... :.... ..... :.... .do :..... ..................................... .................. :..... I.... ..................... ............... ....... ............ .............. ................... ...- a . e.... a...... rmatna ..................v.. .... ...... .. ............................ . T.. .. M.... ..............S. ...................................................... .. .......... ..... ........... ....X... . S.. . ............................... .......... ............................................................................ ........................................ ............. 6.. Curb And Gutter, Storm Drain Asphalt, Concrete Not Susceptible Hardened Channel 0.20 miles ........... Santa Gertudis Not Susceptible Creek Partially EFHM and Riverwash (Over 20,000 cfs) Large River Reaches Santa Margarita Not Susceptible ....................... River, Upper Reach Riverwash (Over 20,000 cfs) Large River Reaches Santa Margarita River, Lower Reach No Data At This Time No Data At This Time Large River Reaches information taken from Riverside County Stormwater Conservation Tracking Tool. ..................... ** Exemptions take from Santa Margarita Region Hydromodification Management Plan, May 2014, A.4 Additional Perm its/Approvals requiredfor the Pro*ect. J abie A3rw State Department of Fish and Game, 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement El Y Z N .............. State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification F-1 Y Z N ............ US Army Corps of'Engineers, Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit Y N US Fish and Wildlife, Endangered Species Act Section 7 Biological Opinion Y Z N ............. ............................. Statewide Construction General Permit Coverage Y N ............................... Statewide Industrial General Permit Coverage 0 Y [] N Western Riverside MSHCP Consistency Approval (e.g., JPR, DBESP) El Y Z N Other (please list in the space below as required) - City of Temecula Building Permit - City of Temecula Grading Permit Y Y L _J1 N I If yes is answered to any of the questions above, the Copermittee may require proof of approval/coverage from those agencies as applicable including documentation of any associated requirements that may affect this Project -Specific W.SIP. Did you identify and preserveexisting drainage patterns? If so, how? If not, why? Existing site drains to MS4 without treatment, drainage patterns will be modified to direct runoff towards the proposed LID BMPs,. These B Ps will provide treatment to runoff before discharge to the MS4. Did you identify and protect existing vegetation? if so, how? If not, why? Existing .site is as Ire fall lot that was previously graded for commercial use. There Is no existing vegetation to protect. [did you identify and preserve natural infiltration capacity? If so, how? If not, why? Natural infiltration capacity exists on the project site and infiltration testing was performed. Did you identify and minimize impervious area? If so, how? If not, why?' Yes, impervious was minimized ' to the maximum extent passible, "impervious areas will have runoff dispersed to permeable paving areas and as much landscaping as feasible has been Included in the project"s design. Did you identify and disperse runoff to adjacent pervious areas` If so, 'how? If not, why? Yes, runoff will be dispersed' to permeable paving areas and landscaping is being utilized as much as feasible. Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA_ ---------- Section C., Delineate Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) ,T'ail-, I P. J. "MA C I'l S & i fl ca inns N AT WATER USE CONSEATIVE RV ------------- CONSERVATIVE IM son DTIM Water Quality Managernen.t Plan Lot 11. Parking Lot "Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1., PA Note: (See Section 3.3 of WQMP Guidance Document) Ensure that partially pervious areas draining to a Self Retaining area do not exceed 'the following ratio: DMAI: IP1, P'P1 PP1 Dk1 A2: IP2, PP2 PP2 DMA3:IIP3, PP3 _ PP3 [f�d1�4 IP4, PP4 _ PP4 DMA5; IP5, P'P5 PP5 DIVIA6; IIP6, PP6 _ _ PP6 D.1 Infiltration Applicability An assessment of the feasibility of utilizing Infiltration BMPs is required for all projects, except in the following case: If yes has been checked, both Infiltration BMPs and Hydrologic Control BMPs that include an infiltration functionalities may not be feasible for the site. It is recommended that you contact your Copermittee to verify whether or not infiltration within the Project is Infeasible. 1211 Is this project classified as a small project consistent with the requirements of Chapter 2 of the WQMP Guidance Document?.Zy E] N Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 2 61-1, PA Infiltration TableDA below e provide Infiltration BMPs and is discussed in the WQMP Guidance Document in Chapter 2.3.4. Check the appropriate box for each question and then list affected DMAs as applicable. If additional ! e is needed, add a row below the corresponding answer. If you answered "Yes" to any of the questions above :o. :+for any Water Quality Management Plan' Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA,, Please check what applies: Reclaimed water will be used for the non -potable water demands for the Project. if any of the above boxes have been checked, Harvest and Use BIVIPs reed not be assessed for the site. If neither of the above criteria applies, follow the steps below to assess the feasibility of irrigation use, toilet use and other nor -potable uses (e.g., industrial use). Irrigation Use Feasibility Complete the following' steps to determine the feasibility of harvesting stormwater runoff for Irrigation Use BIVIPs on your site: Step 1 Identify the total area of irrigated landscape on the site, and the type of landscaping used. Type of Landscaping (Conservation design orActive Turf): Conservation Step 2: Identify the planned' total of all impervious areas on the proposed project' from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for irrigation use. '[depending' on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff 'to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above. Total Area of Impervious Surfaces; 0.805 acres Step 3; 'Cross' reference the Design Storm' depth for the project site (see Exhibit A of the WQMP Guidance Document) with the left column of Table 2-4 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum area of Effective Irrigated Area per Tributary Impervious Are (EIATIA)a Enter your FIAT IA factor: 3.188 Step aMultiply the unit value obtained oa 3 by the totalof pa s:..: Step 2 to develop the minimum irrigated area that would be required. Step 5, Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for irrigation use is feasible for the project 'I comparing the total area of irrigated landscape (Step 1) to the minimum required irrigated are (Step 4 Available irrigated Landscape --------------- • A:acres 0.490 acres Water Quality Management Plan' Lot 11 Parking Lot' "Lot 11 of Parcel Map 3561-1, PA' flushingComplete the following steps to determine the feasibility of harvesting stormwater runoff for toilet uses on your site - Step any periodic shut downs or other lapses in occupancy: Chapter Step 3: Enter the Design Storm depth for the project site (see Exhibit A) into the left column of Table 2- # determine the minimum numberor per # impervious (TUTIA). Eater your TUTIA factor: 182.4 Step 4. Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 3 by the total of impervious areas from Step 2 to develop the minimum number of toilet users that would be required. Minimum number of toilet users: 147 Step 5. Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for toilet flushing use is feasible for the Project by comparing the Number of Daily Toilet Users (Step 1) to the minimum required number of toilet users (Step 4). minimum required Toilet Users (Step 4) Projected number of toilet users (Step 1) -------------------------- Are there ether non -potable uses for stormwater runoff on the site (e.g. industrial use')? See Chapter of the Guidance for further information. If yes, describebelow. if no, write N/A. Step I- identify the projected average daily non -potable demand, in gallons per day, during the Wet Season and accounting for any periodic shut downs or other lapses in occupancy or operation. Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA -A • •::> -:• • is ., •- r #: - # • •# -t `: # — #: •. • is i i is # t # # ! • #: Step 3: Enter the [design Storm Depth for the Project site „(see 'Exhibit A) into the left column of Table 2- 5 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum demand for non' -potable uses of storm water runoff per tributary impervious acre. Enter the factor from Table 2-3; NIA Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 4 by the total of impervious areas from Step 3 to develop the minimum gpd of non -potable Use that Would be required. Step 5., Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for other non -potable use is feasible for the Project by comparing the Number of [wily Toilet Users (Step 1) to the minimum required number of toilet users (Step 4). Minimum required non -potable use (Step 4) J Projected average daily use (Step 1) t. k I F11 If Irrigation, Toilet and tither Use feasibility anticipated demands are less than the applicable minimum values, Harvest and Use BMPs are not required and you should proceedto utilize LID B oretention and Bibtreatment BMPs, € mess a site -specific analysis has been completed that demonstrates technical infeasibility as noted in D.3 below. Irrigation Area Deeded: 2.566 acres Irrigation AreaAvailable: 0.490 acres therefore Irrigation Infeasible Minimum Toilet Users: 147 Project Toilet Users': 6'' therefore Toilet Use Infeasible Other Non -Potable n/a therefore Other Uses Infeasible •IMMOR R firml JrJ.. 0 LID s _ _ s'lotreatment s r's will be used for some or all ;.s of the Project below in Section DA '" !' ' .,.:B : '! ! • is #' 8 8 ' :: 3:: ': a � .: m : � is ,;. ' ': i .'::.' «: :1 Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA Onsite retention may not be feasible due to specific geotechnical concerns identified in the Geotechnical Report. If any, describe below. If no, write N/A: On -site retention is infeasible because Section 9.12.1 of the referenced geotechnical report (providedfor reference in Attachment 3) lists "'Uncontrolled infiltration of irrigation excess and storm runoff into the soils can adversely affect the performance of the planned improvements. Saturation of soil can cause it to lose internal shear strength and increase its compressibility, resulting in a change to important engineering properties."' For those DMAs where LID BMPs are not feasible, provide a brief narrative below summarizing why they are not feasible, include your technical infeasibility criteria in Appendix 5, and proceed to Section E below to document Alternative Compliance measures for those DMAs. Recall that each proposed DMA must pass through the LID RI hierarchy before alternative compliance measures may be considered. LID BMPs not needed as Infiltration will be utilized. Eton Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PPS_ r. R q e:.m. y 9 9 Water 'Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Last Lot 11 of Parcel Map 213561-1, PA 1 Water Qualiq, Management Plan Lot 11'Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA Each LID BMP must be designed to ensure that the Design Capture Volume (DCV) will be addressed by the selected BIVIPs. First, calculate the Design Capture Volume for each LID BIVIP using the 'VBm.p' worksheet in Appendix F of the LID BIVIP Design Handbook. Second, design the LID BMP to meet the required V,3mp using a method approved by the Copermittee. Utilize the worksheets found in the LID BMP Design Handbook or consult with your Copermittee. Complete Table D.5 below to document the Design Capture Volume and the Proposed Volume for each LID BMP. You can add rows to the table as needed. Alternatively, the Santa Margarita Hydrology Model (SMRHM) can be used to size LID BMPs to address the DCV and, if applicable, to size Hydrologic Control BMPs to meet the Hydrologic Performance Standard of the SIVIR HMP, as identified in Section E. a b y e D, 5 L: [, B <,A P S i DMA1- IP1, PPI PERMEABLE PAVING DMA2- IP2, PP2 PERMEABLE PAVING DM4.3 PP3 1 DMA3- IP3, PP3 PERMEABLE PAVING DMA4: IP4PP4 PERMEABLEPAVING ss ............ DMA5 PP5 ....... .................. DMA5�i IP5, PP5 ................ -------------------- - ----- - --------- DMA6/ PP DMA6� IP6, PP6 PERMEABLE PAVIN JWa, If a completed Table A.2 demonstrates that the project is exempt from HMP Performance Standards, specify N/A of proceed to Section F, if applicable, and Section G. Project is Exempt per Table A.2 and Section E -is N/A An assessment of the feasibility of implementing onsite Hydrologic Control BMPs is required for al - projects. Select one of thefollowing: Yes —The implementation of Hydrologic Control BMPs is feasible onsite. (Proceed to Step E.3 and Step E.4) - Or - If the reasons for infeasibility are different from those listed in Section D.1, describe the technical or spatial reasons that preclude the implementation of onsite Hydrologic Control BMPs. If none, write N/A: N/A Approval of the condition for infeasibility, if any, is required by the Copermittee. Has the condition for infeasibility been approved by the Copermittee? ''rivilla= SMEM 0=0 Yes —The project site is equal to or larger than one acre. (Proceed to Step E.3' Step E.4, and Step E.5) 9111111rom 1:1 No'— The project site is less than one acre. (Follow the remoinderof Step E.2) Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 2 561-1, PA 1 � !: a i.. # :: o : i is o is . ! :� • ..:: is $ is # •::° $ $ 's a # ®: is CON:i $:i' $ ® i:. � �:.# �... •H: i, $. s:;.A s. a:i: 1:1 Yes — Onsite Hydrologic Control BIVIPs are feasible. (Proceed to Step E., Step EA, and Step E.5) No — Onsite Hydrologic Control BMPs are not feasible per the Simplified Technical Feasibility Study. (Proceed to Section E5 for Sediment SOpply Pw�rmance Standard and Section F for Alternative j s Capture of DCV and achievement of • # # :': Performance Stani:A : be met by ; :: # : " is and/or separate structural BIVIPs. Similarly, compliance with the two identified requirements may be fully or partially achieved onsite. For each DIVIA, identify' in Table EA if the DCV is fully or partially captured' onsite, if the Hydrologic Performance Standard is fully or partially met onsite (by using the SMRHM identified in Step EA), and if structural RM'Ps for compliance with the LID requirement and the Hydrologic Performance Standard are combined'. Hydrologic Control Combined [�Itil� LID QP �'P SIP SIP type and I[ [l Onsite Onsite EJ Partially Onsite 'Partially Onsite El Yes Offsite Offsit 'I sip Required � No None Required ' For each DMA provide a' narrative describing if the DCV and the Hydrologic Performance Standard are to be fully managed onsite. If not, the narrative should detail how and where offsite structural BIVlP's will achieve management of the DCV and the Hydrologic Performance Standard, N/A' •.` i.: i_ :iis o ° �.•::i i' is •"' :i # . i : "' # '". .i .: • f:.,. is ." . � �". i �. • 8 i : i ° i # °s.: ° s i Water Quality ManagemenL Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA_ Hydrologic Control BMP, the Hydrologic Control BMP footprint at top floor elevation, and the drawdown time of the Hydrologic Control BMP. SMRHM summary reports should be documented in Appendix 7. Refer to the SMRHM Guidance Document for additional Information on SMRHM. You can add rows to the table as needed. EA implement Sediment Supply BMPs The applicant may refer to Section 2.3 of the SIVIR HMP for a comprehensive description of the methodology to meet the Sediment Supply Performance Standard. Complete the following steps to determine compliance with the Sediment Supply Performance Standard. Step 1: Identify if the site is a Significant Source of Bed Sediment Supply to the receiving channel El Step I.A — Is the Bed Sediment of onsite streams similar to that of receiving streams? Rate the similarity: F] High 0 Medium �Z!111111111 Step 1.B —'Are onsite streams capable of delivering Bed Sediment Supply from the site, if any, to the receiving channel? Rate the potential: El High F-1 Medium Results from the analyses of the sediment delivery potential to the receiving channel should b documented in Appendix 7 and identify, at a minimum, the Sediment Source, the distance to the receivin channel, the onsite channel density, the project watershed area, the slope, length, land use, and rainfa intensity. 31 Water 'Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA Step 1.0 — Will the receiving channel adversely respond to a change in Bed Sediment Load? .ate the need for bed, sediment supply: High' Ej Medium [: Low Results from the in -stream analysis to be performed bath onsite should be documented in Appendix 7. The analysis should, at a minimum, quantify the bank stability and the degree of incision, provide a' gradation of the Bed Sediment within the receiving channel, and identify if the channel is sediment supply limited ® Step I.D —Summary of Step Summarize in Table E.3 the findings of Step 1'and associate a score (in parenthesis) toeachstep. The sure of the three individual scores determines if a stream is a significant contributor to the receiving stream 0 Sum is equal to or,greater than eight n Site is a significant source of sediment bed material — all on -site streams must be preserved or by-passed within the site plan. The applicant shall proceedto Step 2 for all ons'ite streams. a Sure is greater than fire but lower than eight. Site is a source of sediment bed material some of the on -site streams rust be preserved (with identified streams noted). The applicant shall proceed to Stop 2 for the identified streams only. a Sure is equal to or lower'than five. Site is not a significant source of sediment bed material. The applicant may advance to Section'F.' Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA Step 2: Preservation of Identified Onsite Channels Onsite streams identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment should be avoided in the site design. Check one of the following: E] The site design does avoid all onsite channels identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment (The applicant may disregard subsequent steps of Section E5 and directly advance directly to Section F.) - Or- F� The site design does NOT avoid all onsite channels identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment (The applicant may proceed with the subsequent steps of Section E5). Provide in Appendix 7 a site map that identifies all onsite channels and highlights those onsite channels that were identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment. The site map shall demonstrate, if feasible, that the site design avoids those onsite channels identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment. In addition, the applicant shall describe the characteristics of each onsite channel identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment. If the design plan cannot avoid the onsite channels, please provide a rationale for each channel individually. N/A Step 3: By -Pass of Upstream Drainage(s) to Preserve the discharge of Bed Sediment Supply to the receiving channel(s) Onsite channels identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment Supply should be by-passed the discharge of Bed Sediment Supply to the receiving channel(s). Check one of the following: El The site design does avoid and/or bypass all onsite channels identified as a source of Bed Sediment Supply (The applicant may directly advance to Section F) BOOM 0 The site design does NOT avoid or by-pass all onsite channels identified as a source of Bed sediment Supply (The applicant may proceed to an Alternative Approach, as dofted in Section F). Provide in AppencliX 7 a site map that identifies all onsite channels and highlights those onsite channels that were identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment Supply. The site map shall demonstrate, if feasible, that the site design avoids or by-passes those onsite channels of significant Bed Sediment Supply to the receiving channel(s). In addition, the applicant shall describe the characteristics of each onsite channel identified as a Significant Source of Bed Sediment Supply. If the design plan cannot avoid or by- pass the onsite channels, please provide a rationale for each channel individually. Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA_ Section F.: Alternative Compliance LID BMPs and Hydrologic Control BMPs are expected to be feasible on virtually all projects. Where LID BMPs and/or Hydrologic Control BMPs have been demonstrated to be infeasible as documented in Section D and/or Section E, respectively, otherTreatment Control BMPs or alternative compliance approaches must be used (subject LID waiver and/or HIVIP alternative compliance approval by the Copermittee). ll�iU 0 LID Principles and LID BMPs have NOT been incorporated into the site design to fully address Mz LID requirements for all Drainage Management Areas AND HIVIP Performance Standards are not fully addressed in the following Drainage Management Areas. o A site specific analysis demonstrating technical infeasibility of Hydrologic Control BMPs, and Sediment Supply BMPs has been approved by the Copermittee and included in Appendix 7. Projects less than one acre have completed the Simplified Technical Feasibility Study. The applicant should complete Section F.5 and/or Section F.6, as applicable. N/A - Or - 11 LID Principles and LID BMPs have been incorporated into the site design to fully address the DCV for all Drainage Management Areas. However, HIVIP Performance Standards are not fully addressed in the following Drainage Management Areas. A site specific analysis demonstrating technical infeasibility of Hydrologic Control BMPs and Sediment Supply BMPs has been approved by the Copermittee and included in Appendix 7. Projects less than one acre have completed the Simplified Technical Feasibility. The applicant should complete Section F.5 and/or Section F.6, as applicable. M IME Water'Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA Identify Pollutants of Concern Utilizing Table A.1 from Section A above which noted your project's Receiving Waters and their associated USEPA approved 303(d) listed impairments, cross reference this information with that of your selected Priority Development Project Category in Table FA below. If the identified General Pollutant Categories are the same as those listed for your Receiving Waters, then these will be your Pollutants of Concern and the appropriate box or boxes will be checked on the last row. The purpose of this is to document compliance and to help you appropriately plan for mitigating your Pollutants of Concern in lieu of implementing LID BIVIPs. P = Potential N = Not Potential A potential Pollutant if non-native landscaping exists orbs proposed onsite; otherwise not expected A potential Pollutant if the project includes luncovered parking areas; otherwise not expected A potential Pollutant is land use involving animal waste rat Specifically petroleum hydrocarbons Specifically solvents Bacterial indicators are routinely detected in pavement runoff Water Quality Management'Pian Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA Projects that cannot implement LID BMPs but nevertheless implement Smart Growth Principles are potentially eligible "/f-:b' 4, for : o '. "4 . , Credits. Utilize Table3-7 within .4, . Q: . ; ;B' Guidance i:,F,:e Document :,i.;iK: o identify your Project Category and its associated Water Quality Credit. If not applicable, write N/A. Total Credit Percentage' 'Cannot Exceed .50% z0btain corresponding data from Table 3-7 in the °WQMP Guidance Document F.2 Sizing Criteria After you appropriately considered Stormwater Credits for your Project, utilize Table F.3 below to appropriately size them to the DCV, or Design Flow Rate, as applicable. Please reference Chapter 3.5.5 of the WQMP Guidance Document for further information. Fad Hydrologic PerformanceStandardCompliance Approach N F.5 Sediment Supply Performance Standard - Alternative Compliance t. ;07: Water Quality Management Plan is 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA_ .................... ------------------------ ............................. "'K'. -> r, --:i-4 r, m /-­,,c­,,,urce Control BMPs 11111115 �1111J� "J'"'IJ Source Control BMPs include permanent, structural features that may be required in your Project plans — such as roofs over and berms around trash and recycling areas — and Operational BIVIPs, such as regular sweeping and "housekeeping", that must be implemented by the site's occupant or user. The Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) standard typically requires both types of BMPs. In general, Operational BIVIPs cannot be substituted for a feasible and effective structural BMP. Using the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist in Appendix 8, review the following procedure to specify Source Control BMPs for your site: f. Ident* Pollutant Sources: Review Column 1 in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. Check off the potential sources of Pollutants that apply to your site. 2, Note Locations on Project -Specific WQMP Exhibit: Note the corresponding requirements listed in Column 2 of the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. Show the location of each Pollutant source and each permanent Source Control BMP in your Project -Specific WQMP Exhibit located in Appendix 1, 3. Prepare a Table and Narrative: Check off the corresponding requirements listed in Column 3 in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. In the left column of Table G.1 below, list each potential source of Pollutants on your site (from those that you checked in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist). in the middle column, list the corresponding permanent, Structural Source Control BMPs (from Columns 2 and 3 of the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist) used to prevent Pollutants from entering runoff. Add additional narrative in this column that explains any special features, materials or methods of construction that will be used to implement these permanent, Structural Source Control BMPs. 4, identify Operational Source Control BMPs: To complete your table, refer once again to the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. List in the right column of your table the Operational BMPs that should be implemented as long as the anticipated activities continue at the site. Copermittee stormwater ordinances require that applicable Source Control BMPs be implemented; the same BMPs may also be required as a condition of a use permit or other revocable Discretionary Approval for use of the site. -31- Water 'Quality Management Flan Lot 11 Parking Lot' Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PAS Plan .: C n.:9oi tfi K:.. I S rf.: F� BMP No. or BMP Identifier and Description Corresponding Plan Sheet(s) PERMEABLE PAVERS GRADING PLAN — PP2 PERMEABLE PAVERS GRADING PLAN 7PLAN — PP3 PERMEABLE PAVERS GRADING ::.l:..l 8� A PERMEABLE # sm Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 ParkingLot Lot 11' of Parcel flap 2 561-1, PA 'f /'r /•�-1f 4:/fq ffi % %%fi:%r V, "yt f:.%%%fi:/. fy l� f"� %f�% i%i�::/� fi: r rf :/f %fi. `%:j jf., % fi l: i%f�: r„f f r - s/ f r tfr rs. s/ .t r„/ � f l .. .fff ! �,n e a � %% % % The Copermittee with jurisdiction over the Project site will periodically verify that BMPs on your Project are maintained and continue to operate as designed. To make this possible, the Copermittee will require that you include in Appendix 9 of this Project' -Specific WQMP: 1 A means to finance and implement maintenance of BMPs in perpetuity, including replacement' cost. 2. Acceptance of responsibility for maintenance from the time the BMPs are constructed until' responsibility for operation and maintenance is legally transferred. A warranty covering a period following construction may also be required. 3. An outline of general maintenance requirements for the Stormwater BMPs you have selected.. 4. Figures delineating and designating pervious and impervious areas, location, and type of Stormwater BMP, and tables' of pervious and impervious areas served by each facility. Geom locating the BMPs using a coordinate system of latitude and longitude is recommended to help facilitate a future statewide database system. 5. A separate list and location of self -retaining areas or areas addressed' by LID Principles that do not require specialized Operations and Maintenance or inspections but will require typical' landscape maintenance as noted in Chapter 5 in the WQMP Guidance. Include a brief description of typical landscape maintenance for these area's. The Copermittee with jurisdiction over the 'Project site will also require that you prepare' and submit a' detailed BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan that sets forth a maintenance schedule for each of the BMPs built on your site. Are agreement assigning responsibility for maintenance and providing for inspections and certification may also be required. Details of these requirements and instructions for preparing a BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan are in Chapter 5 of the WQMP Guidance Document. Maintenance Mechanism: Property Owner Will the proposed' BMPs be maintained by a Homeowners' Association (H OA) or Property' Owners Association (POA)? Include your Operation and Maintenance Plan and Maintenance Mechanism in Appendix 9. Additionally, include all pertinent forms of educational materials for those personnel that will be maintaining the proposed BMPs within this Project -Specific WQMP in Appendix 10. mom Water duality Management Plan Lot 11 Farling Lot Lot 11'at Parcel Map 23561- , PA % �'f ,$w C. ffffj xf i s 101 % ! , f'' ' f' : f i i, i � � i y { o l s l/ / t/. /. F,:// ..l 2010 SMR MS4 Order No. R9-2010-0016, an NPDES'Permit issued by the San Diego Permit Regional Water Quality Control Board. Applicant Public or private entity seeping the discretionaryapproval of new or replaced improvements from the Copermittee with jurisdiction over the project site. The Applicant has overall responsibility for the implementation and the approval of a Priority Development Project. The WQMP uses consistently the term "user" to refer to the applicant such as developer or project proponent. The WQMP' employs) also the designation "user" to 'identify the Registered 'Professional Civil Engineer responsible for submitting the Pr�o-°ect®S ecific �' QMP, and designingthe required BMPs.-. t ry a en Defined in 40 CFP 122.2 as schedules of activities, prohibitions of Practice _ p practices, maintenance procedures, and ether management" practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the United. , States', BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating ` procedures and practices to control plant site .runoff, spillage or leafs, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage frtsm raw material storage,. In the case of municipal storm eater permits, BMPs are �icall' used in lase of'nurn.�ric �fflu�nt limits. BMP `act Sheets BMP Fact Sheets are available in the LID BMP Design Handbook. Individual BMP Fact Streets include sitting considerations, and design and sizing ,guidelines for seven types of structural BMPs (infiltration basin, infiltration trench, permeable pavement, harvest -and -use, bioretention., extended detention basin, and sand, filteft, California Publisher of the California Storniwater best Management Practices' Stormwater Quality Handbooks, available at Association (CAS Conventional � type of BMP that provides treatment of stormwater° runoff. ; : Treatment Control Conventional treatment control BMPs, while designed to treat BMp particular Pollutants, typically do not provide the same 'level of volume reduction as LID BMPs, and commonly require more specialised maintenance than. LID BMPs, As such, the 2010 SMR MS4 Permit and this WQ1A4P require the use of LID BMPs wherever feasible, before Conventional 'Treatment BMPs can be considered or irn 'lernented, Copermittees The 2010 S IB 1 S4 Permit identifies the Cities of Murrieta, Temecula, and Wildomar, the County, and the District as Cd ermittees for the SMR. County The abbreviation refers to the County of Riverside in this document. Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA_ .......... ----------------- CEQA California Environmental Quality Act ® a statute that requires state and local agencies to identify the significant environmental impacts of their actions and to avoid or mitigate those impacts, if 1 feasible. CIMIS California Irrigation Management Information System - an integrated network of 118 automated active weather stations all over California managed by the Calffornia Department of Water Resources. ............. CW.A: Clean Water Act - is the primary federal law governing water pollution. Passed in 1972, the CWA established the goals of eliminating releases of high amounts of toxic substances into water, eliminating additional water pollution by 1985, and ensuring that surface waters would meet standards necessary for human sports and recreation by 1983. CWA Section 402(p) is the federal statute requiring NPDES nermits for discharizes from MS4s. CWA Sect -son 303(d) Impaired water in which water quality does not meet applicable Waterbody water quality standards and/or is not expected to meet water . quality standards, even after the application of technology based pollution controls required by the CWA. The discharge of urban runoff to these water bodies by the Copermittees is significant because these discharges can cause or contribute to violations of app4icAabtjl2e w Design Storm _��7atral�ty_standards. The 2010 SMR MS4 Permit has established the 85th. percentile, 24- hour storm event as the "Design Storm". The applicant may refer to Exhibit A to identify the applicable Design Storm Depth (D85) to the pr!Ject. ............... DCV Design Capture Volume (DCV) is the volume of runoff produced from the Design Storm to be mitigated through LID Retention BMPs, Other LID BNIPs and Volume Based Conventional Treatment BMPs, as Desi . gn Flow Rate The design flow rate rep, resents the minimum flow rate capacity that flow -based conventional treatment control BIB Ps should treat to the MEP, when considered.. ------------- DCIA Directly Connected Impervious Areas ® those impervious areas that are hydraulically connected to the MS.4 (i.e. street curbs, catch basins, storm drains, etc.) and thence to the structural BMP without flowing over pervious areas. ........... .. Discretionary:: A decision in which a Copermittee uses Fits judgment in deciding Approval whether and how to carry out or approve a project. ............. Distr'ct: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. DMA:: A Drainage Management Area - a delineated portion of a project site that is hydraulically connected to a common structural BMP or conveyance point. The Applicant may refer to Section 3.3 for further Ruidelines, on how to delineate MAs. _35® Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA_ --------------- „ r d n Time -------- --------------------------------------- Refers to the amount of time the design volume tales to pass through the BMP. The specified or incorporated drawdo n trines are to ensure that adequate contact or detention time has occurred for treatment, while not creating vector or other nuisance issues. It is important to abide by the drawdo n. time requirements stated in the fact sheet for each specific BMP, Effective Area Area which 1) is suitable for a bMP'(for example, if infiltration is potentially fusible for the site used on infeasibility criteria, infiltration rust be allowed over this area) and 2) receives runoff from impervious areas. ESA An Environmental Sensitive Area (ESA) designates an area "in which plants or animals life or their habitats are either rare or especially valuable because of their special nature or role in an ecosystem and which would be easily disturbed or degraded by human activities and developments". (Deference; California Public Resources Code § 30107.5). ET Evapotranspiration (ET) is the loss of grater to the atmosphere by I the combined processes of evaporation (from soil and plant surfaces) and. transpiration (from plant tissues). It is also an indicator of homer much water crops, lawn, garden, and trees need for healthy o th a.nd 7oductrvrtV FAR The Floor Area Ratio '(F R) is the total square feet of a building divided by the total square feet of the lot the building is located. on. Flo aced Flog -based BMPs are conventional treatment control BMPs that are sized to treat the design flog rate. Fppp Facility) Pollution Prevention Plan Hydrologic Condition of Concern - Exists when the alteration of a' site's hydrologic regime caused by development would cause significant impacts on downstream channels and aquatic habitats, ,alone or in con'unction with im acts of other ro'ectso HIMp Hydromodification Management ement Man - Man defining Performance Standards for PDPs to manage increases in runoff discharge rates and durations. Hydrologic Control B P to mitigate the increases in runoff discharge rates andBMp durations and meetthe Performance Standards set forth in the HMP. Hydrologic Soil Groups - soil classification to indicate the minimum rate of infiltration obtained for bare soil after prolonged' getting. The HS s are A (very low runoff potential/high infiltration rate), b, C, and D (high runoff potential/ very low' infiltration rate) Water Quality Management, Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot' Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA ------------------------------------------------------------------------- as: ' >as' s is sus ' iks s JRMP ----- � w i i # f y I " S r� # Handbook ! Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot LID Slotreatment Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA_ BMIM w Af King p" LID Harvest and. BMPs used to facilitate capturing StoriiiWater Runoff for later use ithout negatively impacting downstream water rights or other' Beneficial ►, e; Uses, th 1 ;'BMPs to LID r7ducA capturing stormwater runoff by and infiltrating runoff into in -situ soils or amended onsite soils. -al LI n BMPs include infiltration basins, infiltration trenches', infiltratio and p:Y :. o. r> Retentionwithouttion such as infiltration basins, sdrivers) of post -construction impacts., and help mimic the pre-,: retention, chambers, trenches, F permeable pa�yement ancl�payers, harvest and reuse. les Site design concepts that prevent or minimize the causes (or: LID Princip i i develo merit hydrologic re--- . y. Maximuin i Extefit Practicable established amendments to the CWA for the reduction of Pollutant discharges Attachmentfrom MS4s. Refer to y: complete definition Zoning of MEF. classification for parcels 2 or more having residential 'w w " w rr, ♦ ♦ New �. 4 : r # # .rim 0:10003. -f:: �� o, „F described Water Quality Management Flan' Lot 11 Parking Lot,l Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA NPDES National Pollution. Discharge Elimination System w Federal program for issuing, modifying, revoking and reissuing, terminating, monitoring and enforcing permits, and imposing and enforcing pretreatment requirements, under Sections 307, 318, 402, and 405 of the C if.. NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service P Priority Development Project w Includes New Development and Redevelopment project categories listed in Section F.1.d(2) of Order o. R9-2009-000 : ------------------_ Priorit Pollutants Pollutants expected to be present on the project site and for which Inc rn a downstream water body is also listed as Impaired under the C A Section 303 d. list or a TML)T�. ............... Project -Specific A plan specifying and documenting permanent LID Principles and WQMp Stormwater BMPs to control post -construction Pollutants and stormwa.ter runoff for the life of the PDP, and the plans for. operation and maintenance of those BMPs for the life of the! pro" k, L Receiving esters Waters of the United States, .. Redevelopment -_-_--- The creation, addition, and or� replacement of impervious surface Project on an already developed site. Examples include the expansion of a building footprint, road widening, the addition to or replacement of a structure, and creation or addition of impervious surfaces. Replacement of impervious surfaces includes any activity that is not part of a routine maintenance activity where impervious rnaterial(s)are removed, exposing underlying soil during construction. Redevelopment does not include trenching and resurfacing associated with utilitywork; resurfacing existing roadways; new sidewalk construction, pedestrian ramps, or bike lane on existing roads, and routine replacement of damaged pavement, such as pothole repair. Project "that "meets the criteria described in Section 1. Runoff ` Fund Runoff Funds have not been established by the Copermittees and are not available to the Applicant. If established, a Runoff Fund will develop regional mitigation projects where PL)Ps will be able to buy mitigation credits if it is determined that 'implementin& onsite controls is infeasible. San i Regional n San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board' - The term card "Regional Board`', as defined"n-i eater Code section 13050(b), is intended. to 'refer to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Diego Region as specified. in Water Code Section 13200. State agency responsible for managing and regulating water quality in the SMR.. ............ SCCWRP Southern California Coastal Water Research Project ME Water Quality Management !:11Parking Lot ParcelLot 11 of PA_ Site Des�gn OMp Site design BMPs prevent or mmimize the causes (or drivers) oF post -construction impacts, and help mimic the pre -development hydrologic O" rrcelsclassification.i"�residential 'w' 'tor* g Coalition 'The Santa Margarita Region (SMR) represents the portion of th. 'Santa r.: 4' y:: a;a; tershed that includedis County Y; 4 'Riverside. ------------------- Source Control BMP f , Stormwater Credil t Stormwater Credit can be claimed bv an A-o-olicant if certain development practices that probroad-scale d-scale environmental benefits to communities are incorporated into the pr 'ect design. 03 Refer to Section 3.5.4 for additional information oi Stormwater WaterPollution -------------------------- qqi iiS'' �s i USEPA: United States Environmental Protection Agency primary pollutant ds ic capacity such a Plan Management ------------------ Wet -:'The 2010 SMR M54 Permit defines the wet season EN Water Quality Management Plan' Lot11 Parking Lot' Lot 11' of Parcel Map 23561 1, PA A-p-pendix 1: iviaps r Location Map, WOMP Site Plan and Receiving Waters Map .. _..... -------- ., w Ix or — — ___ — — ­_ — LX_,_JE _RQ_P -STO�L !RLIN � — — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — �_ I . — — — K _j _F 26-R 1�1�1 � — .,__'- I'll ­ lv;�� '_",e — ___� — ." ,.,5,x, : .- 4 , __. 0 , .f 4-, *. �"_ ­11-, . . ft, : � _­ -.,AF S11 11 OM 4,01V I A P4 � MADISON AVEIUE I VNIV - 4 - W — — — � L '1--l- — — 12 — — — — — — - & 110 A'9"�_: 1�7 I w — _TL=x —J_ EX. 12 0M .y. OtK . . FS (W15) 9 . FTS-0.-41 W — — fX 12'..kAt WATER 1 — W � w — �M ­.­_�rl I " — .1 - . . _____.­_­. 0 _.._-_,!,Lv14,fI_#_6,_ 9-& L.� � ­ ... . s..0SR. !4­, !....,.;. .�o _I .7, �- ,- 9 *...2.. ; 0- .4. rft*S20 . r-.0.. .v. -0 ,. .- ....",. . ' - � ,Z-%"I. 1. - , �., - e&. .I 11v, . . . I .II 4. , I .,I . .". OkII, .- 0 - _ A1wa­H w1O­r1 .- If - _0 0, , .. -1�..4 ,# R*So* "as I- _ - � Ta %; - 11" W '-.:.6 i,:,�.� - -, P. ... 1.�.IJi1=E ;�gtIm� ­­ _--I�=..-._ "­.,�. .._­,I�.I,....,_: . :0 ..,,-_��L.<..'.,.��._ _7-.. .\ - P ,­ 7,. - .i.. S.. .. 1- .,. " . - ,��r1r�.'-. .,­ �;,.-_.4 ­ � �..%. :.�" �...I'...�, ,� �gx "� .. ­ . .. ...."iI..:-... .�­ �.k. 6 I.. ._ . ,f ... . ,. . - "%.....- I t1....� ..: _99 .,.,,. . .,... 1 . 111 - ..,.-.� i .. .., . �­ � .. '1 , ., ,1 --� - , I­ ffi 11` , : .:. _ :I z1 ..�1 -�I .. 1 _� 1' - - :I ,.. " .:,. � 1 -� �. IW� .., -.� � - � - �0v� U , r k,... z.w I, , " , ,-.1..-. 1�1. ) � , L, _I .0 V _1.._I. v, �. , �.� I., ../ .., ' I. -w I . I .. k -/ �.1 ',- - - I I - , -7 I I � 1,I , � I-- ..� .. \ _I I � l- � 9_�Ift: .' 11�. k:. .:��. .. ..fh.. 9�4 _ ` � d*iIs.I- . It2& v _ .� ,Lk I I­_,-,!411-. �L'q. -..,, �!";is I %�,, awe,.32���' ���-"�_, A -+. �'I I ._, ,PROPSDW,'— ALK , _.... ,—.. ""--.,� "­ _,`.'... .� ��­­ ­, � -�,,.,,,,�-I �5'' '- ' '! , "�. �,,��.�_ _., .. I 0 %, ; :�;I . . :-. q, ':-, I �, ,�, -'_� - �" , � _ , 11,,<:.,.": , , - , , ' , - , I � � .__., , " I ,481 ,- , L-,:� , .1 1 W , \ ��. ��,`l% , � ..*. A�_nw0 % .3 .%, 1 �" l�- , - , , �, ; r. , -� , ,.,, 1 L 8 � " 1 �..I 21 .-I_7 ." ;MV.& -, _�v�r. v . �;v P� Mw.0 � 1� 6��f, -- .�,�'- "� , �i i� ... 6­ . 14­ _I ,NvI � �.�,� , 0sr_ ���1 1 _. _ , 1�1 l . _� nM �'1 �_1� 1', "�_ % �. 20-: , ,," ,F I1I i 0 - �,, ' .� ,�j'1,H.",,� '; , ," ,, 51 � , , ., " A Si . C � , -, \v0L0z<zU7L><0z 1, v,fS0 M�_ _-5 52. ,'� n 1�� I" *�.I�I 1 , kU.,­ _., � I,., , ,',, Ik_ ..�I ON',_;I:I _s_ �', ;� " 1 � �, 1 I - O% jir _1, .�v I , �- , ki o � '1, \ -, %4-, � 0 � 0J " I 1-,, 1�"­_�, "1.J�;\ s ,,3.*X � 1i ,I � �N; 7 _0 S,1­,I ,. �,' 1 ­�& .I � %'\r.1FS � . , PX 6 i P1 , , .."5 �_ :1, FmAI,I "Da_. S p,,k E. A ,� \ 791Ik I,-- �I; ., 1Ni Y, Ic_ _ � I -��," �- *', .. �.,I . I I 1f1%:I �\ . ---.21 u �, %� 0- i , 2S, " � �,, �11_,1, .,] - _a"1� u,. I I ,% V4 l� . l "', 1 , - '�, I fit... ,- ' .�, _ k4% -, A p�tg �.�$�­ . O.w � ��1 , , I e- ti '. S§ "a. w , ­' � ,.,_ 'C I ,� -_ ­. _ , ,fi­ - 4. \­%� 52.!t3x �oI.," "It_. "�_� , \..�_- m 40=1% -rI ".1 , i'. ; 1." . ��I Rf , ,�� "t1 � ­4&I � Q, .. PP I , i I 1�.,� ' !-�­ � - i- - � . A � _ § . �,�_ �"_ 3 1 FS �- .�� d 5. ,� ­ ��', % ,� ."I. - .�"�1.1 Mw, '1� �, '', . . , �`, . , l . oI,is F .a ,o� . _� . I v ��,FS ,S - � ,1 '. � - _�_ � &1 .. P . � "mac- _ . .1�� ,,1'1 _1_'��� 9 zI. _, .1.-..., , X ­­ i 5&7D 55M .k I -1 1it " .-� - 31/ 0 ,1. I " ig�t.�_',' -i S5&�n�"�i" 1� I `-'5. ,,;W_.�'e'tO, i�N '.f ii � .L,­�, FS 1 56 ' ", _, ­ ` .. �- isFS55-SO , �.�.�,�­1 r 11�,io ,_11,1­1­ I,,, ,,, V''� -,� o-,&4'N��'...f,,�i�M. ,., ffl,,_­11, jr_I-�.��.; -_I I1-11v �&0' - Z,�� ­ �21 1. '�­­/- I I I .-? /, _ �-j, �., _', ___. ,,.,- _- � !. ,�I"',`, !,,�-,' \0%. , �(iI �._�. �­ " . I . -1 - I1�.:: -, ,J ,.. .z ... ,. .:! . , 4 - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . : . . . . . . . . . .. . .... . Table C.5, Type "D", Areas. 1hing to BM Ps .. ....�. - . . : .�. . � - . ....: :. ... - .. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..�� . . - . ..:.. . �.. . ... �: .. ... ... ...m.. DMAI: IP1, PPS DMA2: IP2, PP2 . . . . : . . MtD .SP Name or I . .. . PPi ­. .. . PP2 . DMA3: IP3, PP3 PP3 �� DMA4: IP4, PP4 .... - PP4 DMAS: IPS, PPS I— DMA6: IP6, PPS PPS PPS - I'- STORM DRAIN STENCILING 11 " X 0 POINT OF COMPLIANCE .. ' 21q no i �..OE�k. 714i 74-b �w x* At .-, . ... . . . . . .... . ..gable . . C. 2 .O. % a...a.. .s.s.l.ft.... .......i..d........ .. . . . . . . .. . .. I .. .. I . . . . . .... .. . . . ....-. . . - .. . .. . . .%....... I.... .. ��- .�. .__. _. . . I . . . . . . .. . ! % . . . . .... . . . . . . . �*r. . . CIM&WAMe . � . . . . , . . * : : . I ldentffkavoW : .. ..... .. ....... ...... ... . . . .. . . .. . . .... . . . . . . . . . .... . surface Type(s)l . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ... ... .. ...... I .... . %. - .... ... . ....... ... . .. . . . . . . . . . - - .: � Area . . .) . T ... (sq. . R � .... . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . +. . . : . : . . ... :. . . . . ... .. . . . . ­­ ........ ____ .. F. . 1. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . - . . ... .....:. . � . DMA Type . . . ... ... . . . . . I . .., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .... I... . . . . .... ............. . . . .:. . . .. . . . . . .. �.. - % ... . .. ..... . . . .. ... ........ .... . . . .. . :.. . . ­ :.... DMA1-1P1 . .1 IMPERVIOUS PAVING 4,339 . . . . .......... ...... TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP DMA1-PPS. PERMEABLE PAVERS - 11007 TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP DMA2-IP2 IMPERVIOUS PAVING 4,124 TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP DMA2-PP2 PERMEABLE PAVERS 982 - ' TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP DMA3-1P3 IMPERVIOUS PAVING 6,882 TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP DMA3-PP3 PERMEABLE PAVERS . 964 TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP DMA444 IMPERVIOUS PAVING 4,511 - TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP DMA4-PP4 PERMEABLE PAVERS 971 . TYPE D — DRAINS TO BIVIP DMA5-IP5 IMPERVIOUS PAVING 71620 ; TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP DMAS-PP5 PERMEABLE PAVERS 11658 TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP DMA6-IP6 DMA6-PPS - IMPERVIOUS PAVING PERMEABLE PAVERS 7,572 1,605 TYPE D — DRAINS TO BMP TYPE D— DRAINS TO BMP ... ..... - NDSCAPING 249 TYPEA—EL-TREAI NG. N A - ST2 LANDSCAPING 3.,388 TYPE A — SELF -TREATING N/A — ST3 LANDSCAPING 7�025 TYPE A — SELF -TREATING N/A - SRI LANDSCAPE ISLAND 1,351 TYPE B — SELF -RETAINING N/A - SR2 LANDSCAPE ISLAND I 17286 TYPE B --SELF-RETAINING I - SR3 LANDSCAPE ISLAND —_ [ 861 TYPE B — SELF -RETAINING . . . . . ... . . . ...... ..: .. ... .......... .. : . .. ................ .. -------- --- ----------- ------..-----.--.--.-.-.--. . : . : ..... . . . .... . . . . . .. I . . . ... . ­.. . . .. . . . . . . . . :. . . . `. . ble C.2:Tpe X, Self Areas . .... . . .. . .. . . .:.. - . . . . . .m�: .. . ... . .. . . . .. . .....; . . . . .. .. . ... . . . .. . . . . .. ... DMA Na.mi? or : .. . .. . . ... .. .. . . . Idetinca.an .- ...... �:..�..:.... . N/A - ST1 . . :.. . Area:-jSq..�.Ftj . . .. . ... .... . .I 249 . .... . ...... .. ......... ...... .. . ................. . . . . . . Stabilization Type . . .. . .. .. .. ..... ... . NATIVE, LOW WATER USE . . . . . . . .fr..r....l.gf. o.Type. (�. . . .. . .:.)..: : .. . . .... ... ..... . .. ... . CONSERVATIVE ... N/A - ST2 t 3,388 NATIVE, LOW WATER USE -_ CONSERVATIVE N/A - ST3 7,025 NATIVE, LOW WATER USE 1_ CONSERVATIV�__ jlg;�,�, X ON -SITE STORM DRAIN INLETS - . . . . . ....'.... .... ... .:. :..:. . . :. . .:.... : .. . ...... .... . . .. .. . ..... . . . . : :...:......... ..... . . . -.� . :., . .. . . . .... ... . . . ..: .: . . . . . . . . .... . : �. . .�. : - .. . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ..::.:. . . .. . . . .. . - . I .. ­ . . . . . : . . �..... . . . .� :...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... . . . . . . ... . . ... .,:.- .. ... .. . . .. . . . tabW C_3 Ty n r"S. . . . . . . ... . . . : . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pe V,:SetfAetai ink A . . � - . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . - . .. .... . . . . . . . . . . .. . ... . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . .. . . . . %. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ­. . . . , .. ........ ... . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. ... . . . . . . ....... . -::.-: -4 i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ...... . ... . .. .... . '. . . �. : ......... . .:: % :. :.. . . . .... ..: :. . . . . .. . . ... . . . . : .... .. . . . ..: .:% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . :- . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..:.,: . . ............... . . . . . ..1.. .... . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . .. .. .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .: : . .... -.� . .... . ... . . ... . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .:..... . . . : . :- - ... . .­.. .. .... .... . . . .. rea.: .. . .. - ....: - . . . Siff , 411ning Area . . . . � � Type T' uloAs that are� dr4ifning to: theSelf, Nkaining A . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . .. . . . . % . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .... ... . . . . . . . . . . . .... ... ..... : . ­� . �. ..,. . ...�:... .. . .. .......: . . . . . :. . . . . . % . . . . . . . Area . ... - . .. ,f. ... - ... .M::. : . . ... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . .. . ..: : :... . . . . . . .. ... . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .: . . . .:.: . . . . .. . . . . . . . . : ...�.....,.... % . . . . . . : (square. . . . . . . . . . Depth.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ... .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ble: � [C] ftorn Ta . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . . . Required.ftetention::Dept I . . . . . . .,01MA : . .. :- ... : . . ... I . . PDst-project -feet) . . . . . (inches) . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . ...... . . . . . . : CA = . . . . . . . : .. :... : . �. :�.... (it h ' ) ... ....... __ . . [8 I : . _�� -_ . . . .... ..j : ......'..... �%......:.... 1 � N Mef I 0: . ..- . . . ..wrface ype::� ��:�....:... . . . . (A]. .. � - . I .:.. % . .. DMA N . SRI LANDSCAPE 1,3SI 0.892 1 N/A I 0 0.892 ISLAND ..... ..... ....... .. . ........ .... -_ 5112 . ­­.. LANDSCAPE 1�286 ... . 0,892 N/A I 0 --------. 0.892 ISLAND ; I - -----I - — 1 SR3 LANDSCAPE 861 1 1 0,892 A I 0 1 0.892 . ISLAND I . . . . . . . . . . .. . . � . . . .:. . . . I. . . — .. . . . . . ... ORCO AQUA-BRIC PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING PAVERS STANDARD COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT/DRIVEWAY LOADINGS AQUA-BRIC INSTALLATION FOR REQUIRED WATER DETENTION JOINT AND VOID FILLER 2M TO 4i MIN. BASE COURSC 1/4! - 3/8" WASHED ORCO$TONE 80 MM. . 3/4"WASHED FRACTURED FRACTURED AOUA-BRIC PAVER Wi 1/4'HAND OPEN -GRADED STONE. PER OPEN -GRADED STONE PE TIGHTJOINTS PRODUCTAND ASTM AST NO.. 8 F LAYOUT AS SPECIFIED PROVOE NO, 57 BA$E qEQU1'REW,FN1T;7 REQUIREMENT& I t'U.4%_0t_�-,,!�Lf%u�e/_ U A V t—POURED CONCRETE CURB L9 2" BEDDING COURSE a 1/4"-3/8" WASHED FRA�T.VRED OP17-N-GRADED STONE PER IASTM NO. 8 REOUIREMEN . TS I . SLOPE -SEE SHEET PS-4 FOR SLOPINNO CONDiTIONS ­­­. I I � " , ".., �0'1 �,' T �, ­ �,, . r ­,­, . . ..... y­ y- �­ ­­ e­_ . ...... �, V. '­­., - - - I t � �.­��r' , '­ r,-.,! I ­­� i �,A.J�-,,.'.?� ,` Oi,�',� . �,-�. , � " 1 . . - , _,_ � . x �', '1� , �', 5, v�� , �� ;, � �� � ojt ,,�� 1 .11"� , ,� '�� ]"�_,'.'_, , ��- ' ' _��' - r'_� :-' ,', �,,, Y�� ,� ., , , ..,. , , '. , - � . � �� . . ..... 1�._Y­ 1,� �,.­- ,e 1��f 1'k-Y? �1 — , , - " I '_ �, . , , , , . . : I _. . - 1.�-i�. �-'_' , �,��,,.�. . . ��;',-! ... . .. ;�, - , !-.__11 , ��e�', 1, -, � .� �d -','?3r,_,.. - , I _� ,V­ , .. . -1�,.".,'�, ... f , " � � .., , �,Ii , � , .. I I - - _1�. 'i";', �., �. ''., , I- I - iA �, - , ,�_ , ­11 ej,� 9 . 154&,��- •J�,� _4 � �,� _e".,�, - A ., ,k,, :, , ;'� ", I i_;, I - , '.. - . .1� ",Iq , A0 L41A "1­L� A, .� . . . � , - 6 .. , � , - , - - ,,,� 1';�,r'­�?,. - , , IGL�� ,,�. ,,�,,,,, �,�'i, ,"���-,�.��,�,���. 11�11��. - � ,,-: ",_ , - � � - - v 11, § , "I'f_]� A �:-i, " dt �-.", - 11, ,�', _e,-,-- `,,_,� %e,., A � "l •��, �.,. 4 rl�_f . - -, Y , �-­. . ._� , '21(�(�KT . :: . . .... .-.--.. �.1 I �, . - - I -* . _ '�11 _-, ." -.4A,.> `,��- ...'�� .. .... -, - -, ,., _,,� " ...� , , -1 �­ ,., :� ". !,/ �% ... ... ; .�­, _/ �:"��,­"-� ;,�� ­"-'K, I,' %, - ;,`c, _', �z , - � ,�­ . � - , . _,�_. - I , � , � , j , .1 ". .1 _� , V, - . , - y- ; " " , , , -� , � , - , ..�.�'. ,,'--'. -`:,-. ,�. -, , .�' ��i ��.,,,'_.'.,,%,,-' . e' � , --,- -,, ­ ��.�'. � , , ... - - I V 11 ­ "I ,��-_ ,,_.-, ,,.._,5��,:�­-,­ � � -;. - ���,,'.,,".�,,,���?"�,:,�,�,-., ­,'�,, , "'✓ � , , .- �,. " , -, ,� �', 'e. - , '. , � f � r, �1, , - . �:"- �.` " - I � I -, �. .. "7",!, .� -, ­.� " , , , � 1� .,,' '...;,"'. � , - --,-._'.,C,/�,_, -�,%�-�.-,.� -, I - � S, .. ,,,, . I . , , I ,� .�, I, . - y ,�,� ....... � I - , . , i 'i.� �,.'� � � '. 1­--.,.,' � — ­ -/"> ­"- . . , ­'�,',�',_%,, J. , �-._ I..... '. ­� '. .-� j: .. k'," - � -•, � '- -- - -- " ... -, ­, ­­ �., , 1. � . .. .... � , ,_,� . ..". ", - , . � �i � . '. - , I .. , , , .1. ... � " ., , . ,� ��, ., I , , /, , � - ,."A� ,,, .-,, , , � , ,;. " , ,,, c, _ �.; . . .... ", , r, 1. " - ., - �, ,,,, - , i 1 - ,:. .� ��4�._ " , , v L �, " � , -- - � . hl`.',,,`�,``�_"! " � 1, ,�,�,i,.�.�"".��,,�:",.,,-',,i,��.�- - I I , �,�_ . , , , , - " e_ � � K. , � -, .. , i i , .� �,`._.,,- I :�, ,,�:,�,_ _.'.; " r�, , �,,, __.." " '! ,1_ . ,� - , - i - I �,�_/" - - . , : �., " ',i.", " , .; - - . C "'.-`q. - z . ,:,�, , � � ,'" '. e ) ", " - � - _,"', ", --.,, ". " . " - ".. � , ,-`,_/' �_,"",:-.�' . _ -� ,�',"__� � ,� -�,��'. 11'.,�',' ­�, _K, �,`, S , .- , , �11').",_�", ,�"" _: _�r- R11, . �_� 6`PVC Op, SDR 35 Pw •,r,),', -;� .­ - , -, - 1­1 I, , , �.".. '...;�, -" , - , - . �. ., , ill- . . " 1. .. , , I � - - , — ," . , � . %�, I ,.� , - .��i PIPE FRENCH DRAIN , . . SURROUNDED — ..— R— _... I1_ 11111�s. .� . .;Ji I- — WCWHH TAEHRRT ENORONE, QS8ES-IT2RO.ESDNLOE- SPEE $UP -BASE COURSE 1 1/2',3" 1I7_.TO CLAEDFACTUDO-_%.- — DRAIN GRADED STONE PER ASTMI NO. 2 9011/b COMPACTED FILL OR SUBBASE REQUIREMENTS. NKruRAL SOIL SUBG � . STANDARD INSTALLATION WITH CONCRETE CURB EDGE RESTRAINT POURED CONCRETE GRADE BEAM HOLD PAVERS 1/8" TO 3/8* ABOVE POURfiD CONCRETE DRAINAGE \/ #4 REBAR TOP AND SOTTOM POURED CONCRETE DRAINAGE LE/CURS H.. AX PAV1N4tv\ MIN, ,'C_OLD PAVERS I/8'T0 31r ABOVE . P0UREV,C0NCRETE DRAINAGE SWALE 7 7 077� / TYPICAL INSTALLA110N WITH . TYPICAL INSTALLATION WITH ©NCRETE GRADE I EAR . . CONCRETE DRAINAGE SWALE/CURB "SITE COND11IONS VARY, EACH PERMEABLE PAVEMENT DES113N AND INSTAULATION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE RESPONSIBLE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL - SEE COMPLETE DISCLAIMER ON BACK OF FRONT COVER I SHEET NO. ORCO PAVINGSTONES . 4545 RUTILE ST. RIVERSIDE, CA. 92509 C M 1 PH, NO, (951) 685-8498 (951) 6..85-5974 FAX AQUA --BRIO COMM. DRIVEWAY 0 10 20 40 60 1-------.-...........................-.......-.[---........ ........ .1 I I--------= ___ ....... ....... M, 110111in 11�. I I-r-eb = 20 ft f ------------- li# f. fi f: 4. R 1 � #' l i iw y pq (l7 C Ot CD �A 49e C5 o G) Q (} U3 � E? cn 0 E °r^ w CL th CD �7 t49 >e Q? CD co LI IN 11Y 9 L�. l/F �1 1: -' .. .. ,. i w 0 7 Y 1;.; «y IM �i fl► 7p, k is f: 0; S y .....ice------------------------------ Y r w .f 1 4 � Y 4 � ♦ , � � R , , s./ a Y Y f r. %i f' f Y Y f A' Y f 9 j ki. R p; i, t 6 e. w , 4 e 4. +BI' r : i s e. . r f A 4 w Y s a 1 FD C 0 : : f%) ca o w d : 0 ca ci 5 : CD 0 : : co L U) 4N U M :: Z co uj m U) CL Cr < CC g 0: 0 0 U0-10m ------------ ---- -- - ............ ........... . ...... e m CY) ci c cal c !. uj ►- UJ Its N 0i i I cn 0 (3) uj u IJW z CCU CL m cu m m m �S 0 0 0 LtQ CC C t (n tf3 CLcru c� c M .F QD y �ew 6� f Ne f. � wmd � m CD U CD �3 w 6t3 43 (w�) a a dTb3 co ®I ca co CQ � C o°o ?z a� CL a� 0 D c' 0 cO m m a ea in �a a� �i eu CD c, CD CD a� -0 m a)'' m j75 5 A.) 4co qA W U) Ui :5 z D D io 2 C CD � �_ En CL T 4� LU (L w 0 " ------------------ (n (L 3: zuj -------- -------- :.:..}; --- f U 0 •� �pqq 0."f : 4 d �+ od A.eW :3 c :...d : •ded � � dW ,m... f _il U)cc LU co co iwC}co i 0) D U- aW C� w a �] 0 (D C) U) C1 (D 0 ' t�u 0 4- �- ®t3 0 0 ,E as CL �' r. cc to f M M N CN N CL3 Cif tG�b 4i7 ; i° -Rd- lit . cn cCD tit f CD lawn LU t CD s r w > 0 ui co 0 U U 0 ® "+ 0 44 U 0 m au d�5 �R3 t83 ! 0 is 4: r: • F 1 • i *: 1 I4 i, r n q + w. 9 i { e • O "[ • f. A O. + A d� • w. i 14: r:r ■ f' i *► s r q: +m is i +. " r a------------------------- :..c g m Lu m .........4%!f ..:.. cc •.e.... �¢ cr— dim fedsdf ... ..: : '. 0 0 au• `L' LU try 0 u o --------------------- r 11J U IF ® z 0 LL CD 0 CO � 0 LU � aX 0 EcJ eC: f J, C0�� : i f9B w� D w Clf)a E: 1�N p°" ' :.° �ppyy CD cc ca 0 D ® m m m am ------------------- L :Cc ( m p p' e CL 0 u _ b� ..... .. ...:. w ® z 0 0 ol 60 0 0 0 .. co LS C�0 tt3 pipgr� C3 o , gi�miy : 0 0CDLO to CD p0 j0 eN 6: 9e� 'ewe' �tl : y® f : JIle b^^ CD c > ------------- ...ii' .......fii pArd Y�Yfq /e/lyqf tid pWp� 60^/ �Vd Vd Epp 0 i_ CDq�q� qq� tle' ln 0: 6 V Water Quality Management Flan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, P Appendix 2: C"onstruction Plans THE PROPERTY OWNER/ENGINEER OF RECORD/CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA 'S STANDARD NOTES AS SPECIFIED IN APPENDICES D, E, F, AND G OF THE 'tENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION MANUAL" (I.E. SECTION 6-2) IN ACCORDANCE TO CHAPTER 18.06 OF THE *CONSTRUCTION, GRADING AND ENCROACHMENTr ORDINANCE NO. 13- 01. COPIES OF THE NOTES SHALL BE AVAILABLE ONSITE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, CONSTRUCTION NOTES REANTITIES 01DESCRIPTION PERMEABLE PAVERS AREA PER DETAIL ON 7122 SF SHEET 4 2 '4" AC(TON)PAVEMENT OVER 6" CLASS It AB(CY) 515 CY 3 j 6" PVC PERF PIPE 42�- LF ,_.._..____.._..._.._........-._.--.._...._ _..�.._-._.._________ 4 ; EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED9 i EA 1 6 a' CURB TYPE °'D-B" PER CITY OF TEMECULA LF STD, 244A .5' CURB OPENING 9 LF ......................_...._..._....-.-_--__-..-.._............ ... ........ ....-........_......-..__............._....._......_..........._........_..__._..,-..-.-..._.._..__..-.._.............. ..,..-..-........._...m.......,..-„-_._......__.-.............__.__..._._...__...-..............__..--------- ADA ACCESS RAMPS FOR ALL INTERSECTIONS .__....-...-_.....-.__.._....._._....m_.._-.w.µ_ � PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD. DWG NO.442 338 SF -__.._.._ l-_T-R.U-NCATE.D...i -O.MES . " . _..._. .. - _ - ..-...__._... _...... -_-._._......... ........ .- _ ..- _w.._..._.... _.__ 8 1 DETAIL A PER DETAIL ON SHEET 3 2 EA 9 PROPOSED PARKING LIGHT 4 EA 10 24"X24" GRATE INLET PER DETAIL ON SHEET 4 1 3 EA _.......... _.._ 11 f INSTALL 12" PVC (SDR 35) PIPE 198 LF 12 1 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN j 18" WIDE NATURAL COLOR CONCRETE BAND W f � 1 EA SMOOTH TROWEL FINISH __..3 r I $j 1 = INSTALL 1 B RCP D LOAD 2044 SD PIPE f 55 LF 15 ' INTEGRAL COLOR SANDBLASTED CONCRETE 335 SF ............................ -.........__i-..-,-.......,_.-..._ 16AREA FOR PLANTER __.-...,........w.._�.-..--------�.__....-.-_.....--. I _ ........... _.-._..........w......... _.... I ......-,................P................ ...-..._-._•.--,---.r.--._...1......--.�.-.._.....__•-_"-__-�_.__-....-.._....-...-,_--.......-..__........._....._.......-......................-.......---......-.—..-.,...-.r..........,r.-,-._-.......r-.-.-.-. .__....._.... .........-.-.....-- 1 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF TEMECULA ------- -------- ----- .._-_-•.._.----.._-.-.-,-......,.................... ......... ...........-. STD. DWG. NO. 247A EA PARCEL 11 PM 23561-1 PM 157/44 A.S.S.F.SSORS PARCEL NO, RAW CUT— 6"' RAW FILL— AR *UANTITIES ARE ESTIMATES CONSTRUCTIONCONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY QUANTITIE!30 PRIOR TO 18 NOT IN USE � t , AREA 56, 3O SQ.FT,(1.30 AC ) _-..._.._-.€._m-.._...-._.............. ._...... .... _- CAST. 1ST WIDE CONC. 'STEPOUT" PER DETAIL HEREON _-__....___._.._....__ & TRANSITION DETAILS A PER DETAIL ON SHEET 4 369 LF 24 HOUR EMERGENCYCONTACT. -I_._....._-._._._ _...._-._.-_w--_.._-_ - - -- --- -; 24 TREE CRATE (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS PER DETAILS) - _.._..__._ EA PROVIDENCE CAPITAL GROUP, LLC. ANDY I.AUBACH C/O TAYLOR ALLORIGHT 30 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAIL ON 1 EA �. SHEET. ...T�`--.__TC�3 24 HR NUMBER. 31 SILT FENCE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 5 912 LF _..... - w- _......_..... _ _. _ �_._. -_.....................-.._._.-_._-.__.. - .._ --... _ - 32 ! CHECK DAM PER DETAIL ON SHEET 5 - __ _r.._... - (949) 458-581 11 EA -_-.._...-..._...._..._.-..--._.........-._..._._........-._.-_,.._.-._...___--_-,,.-_.._...-_-.._.-_._..--._..-._-..�_-._._.-.-.........: _..-.-.-.-....._.- .•_. ; 33 j AREA INLET PROTECTION PER DETAIL ON SHEET 5 .__._-...................--_.....-__...._......................... 3 EA LOT ACREAGE AREA == 1 r 3O NET & GROSS QSD/P: W LFREDO VENTURA, PE NO GRUBBING/CLEARING OF THE SITE SHALL OCCUR PRIOR TO SCHEDULING THE PRE -GRADING MEETING WITH PUBLIC WORKS,. ALL PROJECT SITES CONTAINING SUITABLE HABITAT FOR BURROWING OWLS, WHETHER OWLS WERE FOUND OR NOT, REQUIRE A 34-DAY PRECONSTRUCTION SURVEY THAT SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITHIN 34 DAMS PRIOR TO GROUND DISTURBANCE TO AVOID DIRECT TAKE OF BURROWING OWLS. IF THE RESULTS OF THE SURVEY INDICATE THAT NO BURROWING OWLS ARE PRESENT ON --SITE, THEN THE PROJECT MAY MOVE FORWARD WITH GRADING, UPON PLANNING DIVISION APPROVAL IF BURROWING OWLS ARE FOUND TO BE PRESENT OR NESTING ON -SITE DURING THE PRECONSTRUCTION SURVEY, THEN THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS DUST BE ADHERED TO: EXCLUSION AND RELOCATION ACTIVITIES MAY NOT OCCUR DURING THE BREEDING SEASON, WHICH IS DEFINED AS MARCH 1 THROUGH AUGUST 31, WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTION. FROM MARCH 1 THROUGH MARCH 15 AND FROM AUGUST 1 THROUGH AUGUST 31 EXCLUSION AND RELOCATION ACTIVITIES MAY TAKE PLACE IF IT IS PROVEN TO THE CITY AND APPROPRIATE REGULATORY AGENCIES IF ANY) THAT EGG LAYING OR CHICK REARING IS NOT TAKING PLACE. THIS DETERMINATION MUST BE MADE BY A QUALIFIED BIOLOGIST. .NOTES'. ESR 1. THIS LAND IS NOT SUBJECT TO LIQUEFACTION OR OTHER GEOLOGIC HAZARDS. 2. THIS MAP IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE FEMA FLOODWAY MAP OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA. 3. THIS LAND IS NOT SUBJECT TO OVERFLOW, INUNDATION, OR FLOOD HAZARD 4. THERE ARE NO KNOWN EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. CAUTION: THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR 11A81E FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST 6E IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. NOTICE.T.O.-PONTRACTO-R CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AND SMALL REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORD. *CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITY LATERALS AND SHALL.. NOTIFY ENGINEERS IF THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL_. VERIFY THIS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IN ORDER FOR THE ENGINEERS TO MAKE THE PLAN CHANGES. CONSTRUCTION RECORD Contractor Inspector Date Completed DATE BY RE\ISIONS ACC'D BENCH MARK I SEAL: SCALE E Horizontal JAI �," No. 66532 ' SEE ABOVE s-�.�N Vertical 4-20 �.p CIVIL .�.� Designed By CITY OF TEMECULA 77 x r5 Nov INDEX MAP 30 SCALE Drawn By I Checked By r epared Under Supervision Of Datw. ., 06Z30L20 RECOMMENDED BY: DATE ACCEPTED BY: DATE,-, PATRICK RICK THOMAS, PE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. No. 44223 6vi-Mommm TITLE SHEET & INDEX MAP ...R.........ss..R..............................R1 PRECISE GRADING PLAN ...............era..................... ............ e...... n2 PRECISE GRADING i LANs.......... a....e.......sR...........................3 DETAILS AND SITE SECTIONS R.Raaasa:s ssa......R.e .a.a:saf s.na■>... as aRi6ii.a4 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN .s....eras.........ca.,.Rns.......... 5 4S BENCH MARK .R5 .. DESCRIBED BY METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT SO. CALIFORNIA 1992 RANCHO CALIFORNIA, 0.6 MILE (1.0 KM) SOUTHWEST ALONG STATE HWY 79 FROM THE INTERSECTION WITH MARGARITA RD. AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HWY 79 AND AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, 115.5 FEET (35.2 M) SOUTH OF THE DX5510"CENTERLINE OF HWY 79, �•-� 53.5 FEET (16.3 M) WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, 9.5 FEET 2.9 M) WEST OF CURB FACE, 2 FEET (0.6 M) WEST OF STREET LIGHT STANDARD. A STANDARD MWDSC 3--1/4 INCH BRASS DISK SET IN TOP OF A B INCH DIAMETER CONCRETE POST 0.1 FOOT ABOVE 'GROUND. EL= 1043.91 (feet) LEGEND FIRE HYDRANT AC ASPHALT PAVEMEN' °.1j" LIGHT TG TOP OF GRATE LANDSCAPE FS FINISHED SURFACE 0 METER, PULL BOAC R/W RIGHT OF WAY EX. CONCRETE C&G °- CURB AND GUTTER PROP. CONCETE PL -- PROPERTY LINE WM — WATER METER EC EDGE OF CONCRETE FH — FIRE HYDRANT i OO - PROPOSED GRADE FL FLOWLINE % (OO) — EXISTING GRADE INV — INSERT ELEVATION % TC TOP OF CURB PROPERTY LINE TE TRASH ENCLOSURE STREET CENTERLINE FF FINISHED FLOOR TR TRANSFORMER WH . MANHOLE WV — WATER VALVE — COLOR SANDBLASTED CONCRETE WDID# 9 33C383592 Ill ` :. 1. BUILDING D. REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS AND ACCESSIBILITY ONLY. APPROVED BY: DATE: CITY OF TEMECULA 5 T �PA 7--1642— ANBORN ,AVENUE PARKING LOT -1 PARCEL 11 PM 23561 PRECISE GRADING FLAN raw TITLE SHEET Drawing No. PG—1 Sheet 7 of 5 __ ------- . . ....... .. ...................... . ..... . ...... . . . . . . ................... ___ - . . . 1_11-I__ \.4.�1 ,11 � 1 . 1I ,I , "_N' .11 \ , ur .I / ... I.2 . . . ­ I ­ - . ..I. .- . I. . V . -.... . ..A .... . I .. .�- 0 I .r �... � : - I ;I � I� i �a II`. 7.a S .� � i I � - a I1II � IcI I1� e1III," `I .I . ) �I I1, ..�� ..,, , I I - 1 -I� . I- .i 14 �I ,1I1 . � , *I I I * I4 II *1rX�v_2 �0 I-0t1 ->_;l0001 4 0 *64 1 � I 1 11 1 11 11\ � 1 i �. ,-,- - � ,�_1. I ,_� . � - \v,,,,­ EX, ASPHALT � , �1 - �4, I� PAYEE -- --- I .� Z 1\ � \ 1\'\k 1\ , �I � NITO ­�1_I --\ ,� .� :_" _,_ }.TRASH iY-.,� ,­..�,- __...._.RE _,__-_ CL ­ - I. _- \ * �-k � -M M 7iRT W �-�1-V.: -_ . V_ \ �/ I \ i, \ 'I kI, � L� '3 .I­�-V. _ V, '�_.. / 1�5� V, V� __, 7�i­ 16 x -- I - U_ .I V�V� z� V� = �� _ ,- �l � 14. �.. - q- V,� 61V, V91 � V..�; �.Ll VV_.V_ JI�. V1�1 4- C), VV. �,V. l• _" v. 1v } F.. - ,,,- _ V_%, .. V. VI 2 : �I,_I �-� .�, a� _%j%. .. 1 I". V, e .LI �, 5 ,", .. . y"I V.. � �[- "O 1 I� \ �\ I\ I. ,i �1.7 /, _� 0 \ 0"I-V, -4 'M. / �-RE _& TBE -1 �TR , �I I 1_ I� \C _// V. ;lam f D . \8_'5IV�_ V. 5 ,0 Vkvl .. �;�oto V. if- A (n Ln I� 1 V:'. : & V�­ V1R ". _ \ �,,� \ . t, 0 JP t V- �I_ I, 05- I- vVt I" ., \ V_ _ , /; I;41\. V1F. VV. 0 0 A ­­,-j 9 V'- VV. .... %� V_I _ l- , .:V9,000 0 0 �1�11_�__­- 0 . v _-__T.�>�� , X tL / "_ \\ V, Ln C� �. . n Y_ 00 V. 1� V,�tl �A3-.//nV_ ­0V_ Y. i0 ,�_.,_,vV3 il.) . V� VI \ 0 V. "k � v, V, ��' 0 V ,\ v" I < t,� II� 1 -..V, Ln C/ (p 1 0 V1: 1 -, 1. V_ Ln n / u -,/ V- v_ *0 (4 - � v- ..V_. =11 -Ycowtn0 0 MI� ' A ,' 0/ICn , 1. V.�{n4 e 1-01.�� . � I l1 ,`� 0) -j % .IYs�V1L\ul "_ x 4 0 .� _\ -" _I � , ' ,\ 1 , _1.,�-�,"'I ,, I% 1I \ ��L Uc I/ "� ,, V_ _j ....- �, � l, :� \ I�r1""' ,(k L. I -)-­�1 1'1I, .06 � V� %/ �� ­';1'�! �.... 7��il." i � � �� "...1� i S � I t t" V\ -� _- �->�_• - , �I_7 %4,:$ _,I� ;u 1_V, ash _ .�_,� V1��• " �_ " - , _ III __Y_V"I� WI\ - , .;V_ �_ . � - \ " \ , I " ti _\ I %�_ �� _ �\ U1 QAV. � -� \ __\ 11V�,-, 1- � \ V, V_ " I1 _C.-"-0 ..._..-.._.....,­S.%..._...._.... .-_T....M..1...--_.._....-.._-.. .ST1....--..-...­..-.-..-......-..-..-.-...­..--.RU-..,.C_,.T--.._.-,._.,.--.I-I_,�.I.-.---_,..1----I_�1l-.1O,1--"---1_ ..-"-,..-----,-.---�--"--N NOTES OTE_.S.--iI I-------------.................-..---.-..-e-.."--,.--,-.--"-,..-.------,.---,--"--",-..,-..,-.--",.-.-.--,----,-,.........................................-,-.--.-.-."--..-..,-.--.,.-----.,----., IICE SCRIPTION I PERIIEA�LE PACERS AREA PER DETAIL ON i I -1 ---- t­,-I 11I I-1I-I'1-1­I 111-111-I____-____­­---I- -11 I—- -1-11-1 ­ ___ ,__,__.__.._ .� _ _ l- ,---1,, -.-------- -,-._-.-.-,-.---.--.._--.1,--_-----_­--._-----__"--- ,­1�"--,_--_-,__-_-.--_-,-Q--_--­-.�.__--­_-_U_-"..--__.,-,._--.--­,_-----A_-_---_----_ ,-_-.-9--_---._­"---I.--_ "-I-_--­-- -,"T ­_-_-0-----..---I--_----_--­,- -_--1- -­-1 ,-_. --_ -_,--_"_--._._1- _--__-_- -,- ­ -__--_'_- _-_- ," 2 4" AC(TON)PAVEMENT OVER 6" CLASS 11 AB(CY) 32N 616 CY-1-1. _1.__.__t1.______.----.-,--,-----.------------------,---,-.-,,-,.-.----,.-.--,,..,-,-. ---�..-,-,---.---,--,,---.,�1-�.1--,---,--.,.-.......--.,-,--,-.-,-..--,-------..--..,-.-.-,.----------,.--,-^----"-.,-----.-..,---..- - 1 , . 13 6" PVC PERF PIPE I LF -11­..........-f---,----,--------.-.----..---,----------l-".-.-...-----------------..................................................................___......__........._.____,..._.__._ .--......--^."--,.,.^.,..--".,-.-.--.--.-.-l'..-.------­­.1­­-­-­.1---------..,., 4 1EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED 9 EA -1--]f.1_1_____._ I-- ------I------_.___1-------I-.----...I-.--,,.--, ---. __._1_1__.________1_____ - ----------.­ __1._._____.____---------_­1­__._1----------­...­­11-1------I-.-------- _ " CURB TYPE "D-PER CITY OF TEMECULA f LF 1ST4AD. ­­-­--------.........­­.­.................­-,.-­-.-­­­-­-,­-"-.--"-.".-,--,.-,".-.-,-.----.^-.--""-.,--.-.--­___­__1__._- __1____-I­______ __I"_­,__,___­,_----------,-",-,-------,--,---,-------,-,"",,----,-"-' 6 11.5CURB OPENING LF ­.1_ --.-.-,---.-.-----------.-,,--..--.--.-.--,.-.--,--,--.''I--------------.--,---.--------..,----------,-------.----,.------------'---"'--'-j---------I——---------------.---I- _1----------.----_­­----.----.------- j ADA ACCESS RAMPS FOR ALL INTERSECTIONS 1PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD. DWG NO.402 I 338 SF i 8 DETAIL A PER DETAIL HEREON � EA ­.....,........._1­-_-_._­__.__­ -------.............­1­­---­................................I..-,--..--- _........---------------1-1......--..-.,--,--...-.-".--,------"'......­­.......I..-.,-"...�-..-,--,--..,.-"-,-----------.----..-,-,-,--------.-----l-11---..,------,.'I---­­­ , 9 1 PROPOSED PARKING LIGHT 4 EA --..---.,--.--.--,--.1--l-l'--.-.--.-.--.--,-----,-...----,-,-_1­4_ -1 I...."Il.----,.---."--.-11---..---,."-I... . ...........--.-----,--,-.-,..,-----.,.,--.--",..- , I0 24"X24"GRATE INLET PER DETAIL ON SHEET 4 I 3 EA -...............f------ 1_---_1_-1-.-_.1-------__-___-___-1___.___., ­11 ­­1____1111___.__..__ - ,..--.,---------­_1-_1___-___.___--_-1....I------------­­­­.-.......I------- _­1----­­­­....... ...................................................................-.,---..,.--.-.---"---,--.--.,-...-.,---.-.-------.-.- 11 INSTALL 12"PVC (SDR 35) PIPE i 198 LF -.-- __________.________ __ -----__-----__-- -_.--_-_-. _________ ____,_,___,___._. _.,_____.1__ _1___._...____. . I. .... ...... .--------.--,-.----,.-.----------.,.-I.---,.--,- 12EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN i / 13 18" WIDE NATURAL COLOR CONCRETE BANDW/ 1 EA OOTH TROWEL FINISH I! 14 INSTALL 18" RCP D LOAD 2000 SD PIPE 55 LF ... ­­... ............­­­­.­---­__­_,....­-------------- - - - ___-_-_-----_-_-- - ___________ _7 I_- --.---I- -.1..... . 15;INTEGRAL COLOR SANDBLASTED CONCRETE5I i . I -------___ ­ ,--- ­_,_­­,_,­­_____,_,_______ -,--,-------,---,-,----,-,-----"--,-----,--------,---,- ­--­-,­---­.,­..1-1-1111,11­1..........1_.,.___._.__._.........................--------I.-,,.--.,,-.-..------1_­_­-111111--­_­...I-- 16 ' AREA FOR PLANTER _1...I-,-,-,........-.--.-..--..---.-.---,--,--,---,.---.-,---.----.--.--l'--",.-,.I -.--­­-­­-,­,. _­­------,-----,,-..-----,.-,..--.,,-----.,-.l----,-"-,--I ­_.---------__._,_........I...................---------------.-,-..----."---,--.,--.,.---.1--l'I.11---,--.-.1-1-1---..,-. 17ICONSTRUCT DRIVEWAAY PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD. DWG. NO. 2071 EA .1.1--l-.1 L­1-----11......___­--­----­.­,­.­­­-.-­­-----I-----------­-------,-.---- i OT 1 18I NIN USE I I T CONST. 18" WIDE CONC. "STEPOUr PER DETAIL HEREON 19 369 LFTOSHE I& TRANSITION DETAILS A PER DE IL ET 4 1 120TREE GRATE (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS PER DETAILS) 9 EA . . I .�' ..... . .-- .. .... .....: .. ....%. &V -:.. . . i --I I � I 0.- 4* I I � III I M1X (( I I 1 1 I ­- ;< %,f y ,�, � � I ' -A -_N 1� �_.� � �,-I I �1\ '.I,'- I V V� ., . .. ,,n � -- I \ VVI�" V�I V_ ,�. ;�Lyl ImV- - I _ -a) � � = \ P VV� 1� VVf , II-: I& ' "-" .. & '11"I V� I I �_ ,�_ %111 .__� I �_ - 1 VV_ b V. V_ W VI� A �,, - S .m .11 ,� 11_0:V. - '�, . - , li �x V. VI%V� 1_VuV i 1 _ V_ V; . ,� ._ ,'0 � �_ I V. 0 V_ V9 V, _1 -A ­V5 � V.N . . � �- \'1�\ V� n -�1 \- 4� 1 \ I \ ,_� "­-__,\ .•I I-I--.V, 4 �� -- 1 � - I....I.... . . . . .. ...... .... w...... . T:.. II , ,I� 111�% 1 1,II� Iu _* . .. ..:(u. � e.... .... %U0.4.. ,-.. . 0 J 1:. \itIi, V, L%!- � _\ " , " � VUl I1iII- j;n­ 1cJ 1 I I I II I I P..- .- I N\*■ ""-, .--ki A-, 11V_ 19. � � � 1;, k _y.,,!V, W. - - 1_ (P L1 0 I 67-,-\ � I �< _, � V� ""I. V. vl.l _�, 1" ,,� \ ­ l _,,,3� 0 i 11. I .1 _�V, �,I� 'I- I I � V, � f� �Q S ,�. --_'\ q. t 1 _ - I - ,., 0LF :, \ .: §� 2\4 � %1- I•A� u � r, V1, �� \ _V)A4 -,-\- �,��- \ 9-_(n1" -- _ I �I5Ifa , �, � V, 1�U1 \ � .� _\ N \1 -I\ 1, - �I -(\ ....�.v)is ` kI 'A V_ 1�_ % ._,u-� \ t V\I I _ I \ _� _ , II � t < , V " _' , .1� _.- _,, ,I....1- C I I ,�_ I �1. I E W-, _,, .. 'J.I,- I _ - , ,,- ,� , �, _ ­- % i"A. I �oj St 1k. '"14� �_ ,.,_\ � \ ' -� . A . 0 A .,I�V... ul0i I 00 I) ' �1I V, I �P. 1 4 -;11-�, .�- �i , ;i3O ! %_ I . --n -0; �ki %L.® 4' %I1 Ik-1V1"Ln 0�" \ / 11 � iIz - ...). . . - I _.. � U� '�, I . � I 1. V_ - i 1� . I . . V. \ I. -, .. . 7 � ��""� �,�, I:... ",X 1��, % Un %(1 q 4 -A .- -�I� fA V, .M '�_� 4 41,,ul % - N�",- . . .1 � .. (P i . . 4 � ..i :.I -4. 1, '� '?, ,I . I .� I �, �� . \ I i 4 0 0 , : . I .: I; . i . . . . . I . � 4 ' .� X. � P � / CL, 30 DRIVEt�A�yl � '. , ". . (p L 0M ___� 11 '� %, . . . � , IPI ..- � I \ . . It Cn a) � ... i . OSITA=1!:��60.solp ... . \. .. :1 0 � I b I I I I ,,, \ i ... - � C I I � *. � IV, : 2 9- ; I I .. � � ... � . 1. , .1 ... � I .� � A,� � .. I �,, � : .:. ­4 t .,.� �L ... 'VI . 11 lk -..% J 15 ! ,...:. � � ..� . 2 e . .1 I 1 It �� -11 0 - --i . . . . - i I � � \ � Ln �1 0 I I (n � . . I.. . , .� ; . , I � co .. . . \ \ �0 , y M I I ­ I : :.. . . . . . I .. z 11 N � f . : . .. : .. . . , i I I I 11 (A t r \ i . . I ; _;0 � �j \ I \ I . _� b ,Jn ri 'OOK . . \ � .. 9.0d \ 1 1 . '* I 1; _­ '. - 11 V� .. �_ � .. 0 0 . . � . . j - , FA, L11 .1 I \ . ... ......... . _� '� g 0) . l_� . � �� / , 4'1 . V, : i, � r-j tQ . . I , I \ . 2 18 . . I I . - - . : . 0 k ,.�,� 11 . ,I!- � I v I . .1. L. .. .. I * I I � ..: , , 1�1 V. V_ K. �_, - I (-", �_ ,� I .. .. ,I . Si V_ . / V. , \ V_ I -, � \ V. . V� .1. v . L. " W I .. , f , I . . �cl . � e­,% -4 % .. , ;. I - I I . I .. ... .. -0 .0 �_11 '41" �'>a L '. �k, X* j� rr i 0. , . . , \ 11 V, _�., ­--, I I .... '. ­_1111, ,. I � . . IL " � : 114.1 . i �S. \ V_ V. 1�1 --A ---�---_j .�� - . llra I I . C. i. � � I � e � � / .. , . 9 I I� . . . I . . . . �� . ... U. .11 e - . � . / i \ . �.i . " ,.� . . V_ %11 . I III. 01), I i Ln. . 0a - 01' ��- ji I I., I? -4 � \ I'll * A I 11_�' __4 � I I , . . , V. V, I I � . . W V_.: j _Q ._��, . . I � : . V_ 11 �0 11 \ i t , . - 11 i . I , . . 11 , � . 0 � �,_� / _n 1� I .:1, �rpr4 " :�,' � ,I I . , .. V, ! . �11 . . � . . � . . , . I . V. 11�1 . ­­ * ul �� . . -P�1' � �� - ( . e . ,I '. I - : I ') .. 11.) j 1�\� v1_ e .. I �\ ; U. '. �, . V. � V, ---------j 1 1 v fl, / .... �n\ I (p \ V, V, 2.3 0 / , ,-In - ; ` � il:::p �1.�_ . ! 'I \. 'A . CO) i��, �11 V V11 V111 I _. . . ...... ... e �... IL 00 v ... .. . ; .. . �1 1.k - / "I . �111 V, "I I:,,, - _��_ .. _1� / . _v_ �,. . � - . ! , . V, � . .. 0*') � - 4 1 � _� , k '. /(P L. / 11�_ 1�1 V ul I . - I _� � ,.I.. � --, I.,- - 1 I i 11 ". �. � .; . I . . . .. . . . . ... 4 ... I . ,. I . V- 1z, 1�1_ V_ V, V 1,8% (n 0 ��, 4 1 �L/ ". .. 0%..: I / . � ,�:� 'G� I �`�JL 'r Tj ,, , V- V. i1s, \ k ''I 0 . . 'I .. ­ 1. . 21 (D 0 1 \ . . . . .. 4 . '110�, , ,I - --------*#P- V. 1,11 III 0 . . . . . .. .... - --- � . 5 00 ill. , I � I __ I I I / , V- lL, � IL - 11�1 `1 - 5 1 �,__ 11 f ... . I _4t . ­__4 � I I , . , k I .... Un 01 . � � 1�1_ 1�1 . 11�1 I'll "I 1.11 W Ln IX � V_ 25.2" .1� � , � I V11 � -n ---i , . , I � � 1. _'�_---, , r1i i� 3. . I I \ � i \ ... .. 14'' I �& �` L \ 0 V_ il ; I " 1� � I . . . I I I � (.A I \ I 11 11 l- 11 I . . I I � '. fl-a - \ � \ _�_4 lb to -P. 4 . t I :, V'r . , ro,• ... . . .: 1�0 95o2n.40 ... rrznrl rrq- s� ,II ' •91 � n 1f> "i, 1&4 I.4. V55.25 /j eI" (T.�/ , V_ V_ �.1 � 0 I .� FS 4.75 '>- am M\ \ ' I M\ a= so rII 1 , -u � ". I / VU. �M rL I �II 1 I i = I . � . . \ M / ,I I "A. . M on . VIW 3 V, 0 A I I . � I so 1, / : . 11�1 .. : V_ : I" `y- , .. I �k I ! ft , . �� \ 000 I - :. , f � M I* , , I I . .1 G. - 11�1. ll//,-. %�; . : ;� --, �, . � - �� =r- -1 ; W I 11. , . S / . �� oo y- :: / I , �• 1. .1. v G. UTILITY NOTE. �� \1 -IN ;. U. WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER SEPARATE P�.ANS CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS Contractor . . ... ... Inspector - Dote Completed . I BENCH BARK SCALE 17 Horizontol i�VlTjdm - SEAL: LFRW &D, VENTUR No. 66532 Exp. 6-30--20 Cl\qL RECOMMENDED BY: DATE: ACCEPTED BY: ... _... DATE.- I PATRICK THOMAS, PE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. No. 14223 [ [ i 3" CURBr k­ -44 it OPENING 6 tf 1.5 15 If . I ...... ....... .. /.-. ...... __;� . ... .. � : ! 2% MIN 12,5 It MIN 1 6 #f ( )DETAIL A NOT TO SCALE NOTE: USE CITY STD.200 SPECIFIC ON CONCRETE . . .. . . . .. . . . .. .. .. � . . .. .. .. . .. ... .. . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . ..... . . , - . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . I.. ... . . . - .. .. I .. . . . . . - C ITY OF TEMECULA Drawing No. 2 .... ........... ----------. _=�___--i- _== ____:__7_.________� __ -=:: - --: ;��:-:--------------,:--�---,-.------,--------�-..---,.-..--......... . . . .. . _1=_ ___ = -_­_­.-_-- ---------........-......-,---.-.-.--- ­­. .. . I ! I .. 17-1642-SANBORN AVENUE PARKING LOT . . ....- ­. .. . . I .. _ .. ... . PA -1 PRCEL 1 1 .. .. .... . M 23561 .. .. . . -.--------..-.------.- . I I . i .. . I ;, Sheet-2- of-5- L . . PRECISE GRADING PLAN . . . I .�' ..... . .-- .. .... .....: .. ....%. &V -:.. . . i --I I � I 0.- 4* I I � III I M1X (( I I 1 1 I ­- ;< %,f y ,�, � � I ' -A -_N 1� �_.� � �,-I I �1\ '.I,'- I V V� ., . .. ,,n � -- I \ VVI�" V�I V_ ,�. ;�Lyl ImV- - I _ -a) � � = \ P VV� 1� VVf , II-: I& ' "-" .. & '11"I V� I I �_ ,�_ %111 .__� I �_ - 1 VV_ b V. V_ W VI� A �,, - S .m .11 ,� 11_0:V. - '�, . - , li �x V. VI%V� 1_VuV i 1 _ V_ V; . ,� ._ ,'0 � �_ I V. 0 V_ V9 V, _1 -A ­V5 � V.N . . � �- \'1�\ V� n -�1 \- 4� 1 \ I \ ,_� "­-__,\ .•I I-I--.V, 4 �� -- 1 � - I....I.... . . . . .. ...... .... w...... . T:.. II , ,I� 111�% 1 1,II� Iu _* . .. ..:(u. � e.... .... %U0.4.. ,-.. . 0 J 1:. \itIi, V, L%!- � _\ " , " � VUl I1iII- j;n­ 1cJ 1 I I I II I I P..- .- I N\*■ ""-, .--ki A-, 11V_ 19. � � � 1;, k _y.,,!V, W. - - 1_ (P L1 0 I 67-,-\ � I �< _, � V� ""I. V. vl.l _�, 1" ,,� \ ­ l _,,,3� 0 i 11. I .1 _�V, �,I� 'I- I I � V, � f� �Q S ,�. --_'\ q. t 1 _ - I - ,., 0LF :, \ .: §� 2\4 � %1- I•A� u � r, V1, �� \ _V)A4 -,-\- �,��- \ 9-_(n1" -- _ I �I5Ifa , �, � V, 1�U1 \ � .� _\ N \1 -I\ 1, - �I -(\ ....�.v)is ` kI 'A V_ 1�_ % ._,u-� \ t V\I I _ I \ _� _ , II � t < , V " _' , .1� _.- _,, ,I....1- C I I ,�_ I �1. I E W-, _,, .. 'J.I,- I _ - , ,,- ,� , �, _ ­- % i"A. I �oj St 1k. '"14� �_ ,.,_\ � \ ' -� . A . 0 A .,I�V... ul0i I 00 I) ' �1I V, I �P. 1 4 -;11-�, .�- �i , ;i3O ! %_ I . --n -0; �ki %L.® 4' %I1 Ik-1V1"Ln 0�" \ / 11 � iIz - ...). . . - I _.. � U� '�, I . � I 1. V_ - i 1� . I . . V. \ I. -, .. . 7 � ��""� �,�, I:... ",X 1��, % Un %(1 q 4 -A .- -�I� fA V, .M '�_� 4 41,,ul % - N�",- . . .1 � .. (P i . . 4 � ..i :.I -4. 1, '� '?, ,I . I .� I �, �� . \ I i 4 0 0 , : . I .: I; . i . . . . . I . � 4 ' .� X. � P � / CL, 30 DRIVEt�A�yl � '. , ". . (p L 0M ___� 11 '� %, . . . � , IPI ..- � I \ . . It Cn a) � ... i . OSITA=1!:��60.solp ... . \. .. :1 0 � I b I I I I ,,, \ i ... - � C I I � *. � IV, : 2 9- ; I I .. � � ... � . 1. , .1 ... � I .� � A,� � .. I �,, � : .:. ­4 t .,.� �L ... 'VI . 11 lk -..% J 15 ! ,...:. � � ..� . 2 e . .1 I 1 It �� -11 0 - --i . . . . - i I � � \ � Ln �1 0 I I (n � . . I.. . , .� ; . , I � co .. . . \ \ �0 , y M I I ­ I : :.. . . . . . I .. z 11 N � f . : . .. : .. . . , i I I I 11 (A t r \ i . . I ; _;0 � �j \ I \ I . _� b ,Jn ri 'OOK . . \ � .. 9.0d \ 1 1 . '* I 1; _­ '. - 11 V� .. �_ � .. 0 0 . . � . . j - , FA, L11 .1 I \ . ... ......... . _� '� g 0) . l_� . � �� / , 4'1 . V, : i, � r-j tQ . . I , I \ . 2 18 . . I I . - - . : . 0 k ,.�,� 11 . ,I!- � I v I . .1. L. .. .. I * I I � ..: , , 1�1 V. V_ K. �_, - I (-", �_ ,� I .. .. ,I . Si V_ . / V. , \ V_ I -, � \ V. . V� .1. v . L. " W I .. , f , I . . �cl . � e­,% -4 % .. , ;. I - I I . I .. ... .. -0 .0 �_11 '41" �'>a L '. �k, X* j� rr i 0. , . . , \ 11 V, _�., ­--, I I .... '. ­_1111, ,. I � . . IL " � : 114.1 . i �S. \ V_ V. 1�1 --A ---�---_j .�� - . llra I I . C. i. � � I � e � � / .. , . 9 I I� . . . I . . . . �� . ... U. .11 e - . � . / i \ . �.i . " ,.� . . V_ %11 . I III. 01), I i Ln. . 0a - 01' ��- ji I I., I? -4 � \ I'll * A I 11_�' __4 � I I , . . , V. V, I I � . . W V_.: j _Q ._��, . . I � : . V_ 11 �0 11 \ i t , . - 11 i . I , . . 11 , � . 0 � �,_� / _n 1� I .:1, �rpr4 " :�,' � ,I I . , .. V, ! . �11 . . � . . � . . , . I . V. 11�1 . ­­ * ul �� . . -P�1' � �� - ( . e . ,I '. I - : I ') .. 11.) j 1�\� v1_ e .. I �\ ; U. '. �, . V. � V, ---------j 1 1 v fl, / .... �n\ I (p \ V, V, 2.3 0 / , ,-In - ; ` � il:::p �1.�_ . ! 'I \. 'A . CO) i��, �11 V V11 V111 I _. . . ...... ... e �... IL 00 v ... .. . ; .. . �1 1.k - / "I . �111 V, "I I:,,, - _��_ .. _1� / . _v_ �,. . � - . ! , . V, � . .. 0*') � - 4 1 � _� , k '. /(P L. / 11�_ 1�1 V ul I . - I _� � ,.I.. � --, I.,- - 1 I i 11 ". �. � .; . I . . . .. . . . . ... 4 ... I . ,. I . V- 1z, 1�1_ V_ V, V 1,8% (n 0 ��, 4 1 �L/ ". .. 0%..: I / . � ,�:� 'G� I �`�JL 'r Tj ,, , V- V. i1s, \ k ''I 0 . . 'I .. ­ 1. . 21 (D 0 1 \ . . . . .. 4 . '110�, , ,I - --------*#P- V. 1,11 III 0 . . . . . .. .... - --- � . 5 00 ill. , I � I __ I I I / , V- lL, � IL - 11�1 `1 - 5 1 �,__ 11 f ... . I _4t . ­__4 � I I , . , k I .... Un 01 . � � 1�1_ 1�1 . 11�1 I'll "I 1.11 W Ln IX � V_ 25.2" .1� � , � I V11 � -n ---i , . , I � � 1. _'�_---, , r1i i� 3. . I I \ � i \ ... .. 14'' I �& �` L \ 0 V_ il ; I " 1� � I . . . I I I � (.A I \ I 11 11 l- 11 I . . I I � '. fl-a - \ � \ _�_4 lb to -P. 4 . t I :, V'r . , ro,• ... . . .: 1�0 95o2n.40 ... rrznrl rrq- s� ,II ' •91 � n 1f> "i, 1&4 I.4. V55.25 /j eI" (T.�/ , V_ V_ �.1 � 0 I .� FS 4.75 '>- am M\ \ ' I M\ a= so rII 1 , -u � ". I / VU. �M rL I �II 1 I i = I . � . . \ M / ,I I "A. . M on . VIW 3 V, 0 A I I . � I so 1, / : . 11�1 .. : V_ : I" `y- , .. I �k I ! ft , . �� \ 000 I - :. , f � M I* , , I I . .1 G. - 11�1. ll//,-. %�; . : ;� --, �, . � - �� =r- -1 ; W I 11. , . S / . �� oo y- :: / I , �• 1. .1. v G. UTILITY NOTE. �� \1 -IN ;. U. WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER SEPARATE P�.ANS CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS Contractor . . ... ... Inspector - Dote Completed . I BENCH BARK SCALE 17 Horizontol i�VlTjdm - SEAL: LFRW &D, VENTUR No. 66532 Exp. 6-30--20 Cl\qL RECOMMENDED BY: DATE: ACCEPTED BY: ... _... DATE.- I PATRICK THOMAS, PE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. No. 14223 [ [ i 3" CURBr k­ -44 it OPENING 6 tf 1.5 15 If . I ...... ....... .. /.-. ...... __;� . ... .. � : ! 2% MIN 12,5 It MIN 1 6 #f ( )DETAIL A NOT TO SCALE NOTE: USE CITY STD.200 SPECIFIC ON CONCRETE . . .. . . . .. . . . .. .. .. � . . .. .. .. . .. ... .. . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . ..... . . , - . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . I.. ... . . . - .. .. I .. . . . . . - C ITY OF TEMECULA Drawing No. 2 .... ........... ----------. _=�___--i- _== ____:__7_.________� __ -=:: - --: ;��:-:--------------,:--�---,-.------,--------�-..---,.-..--......... . . . .. . _1=_ ___ = -_­_­.-_-- ---------........-......-,---.-.-.--- ­­. .. . I ! I .. 17-1642-SANBORN AVENUE PARKING LOT . . ....- ­. .. . . I .. _ .. ... . PA -1 PRCEL 1 1 .. .. .... . M 23561 .. .. . . -.--------..-.------.- . I I . i .. . I ;, Sheet-2- of-5- L . . PRECISE GRADING PLAN . V, I . \ - 1 11 ILI Contractor Inspector Dote Completed f 7* 7 VerUcol . . ............ ......... ..... 0 2 >OO-op 4 -So ,?,kq ., 0.. 00 No, __6S532 Exp. 6-30-20 CIML Av 11JLFR'E1D-!. D-ITEAN 66532 R.C.E. No Drawn By I so M 0 < x ri M 0 Un x C) (A 00 4 ;0 0 < 0 0 > ri 4h- 0 �0 -0 co S=0.051 14 > C I 7\_ a I N ExIVNG RCP SPPWC [DER DEVIL -2 STD. 335 0 A, C 3E 1 4�- (A 20 50.00$ 1XI EXIST1/2 STREET R-O-W ING ELECTRC -EX M ETEF To BE pEMOVED W W W n, EX.WV ju� I 101 20 11C ELECTF T BE 9ULL BOX REMOVED I L 0 C(49.74) -so Zz�-90 06 v�4 Q C61 CO 0,,)o ).22) '14 C(� 9,10 _A11 5 40, 70 ck-C& 1AIn 0 SEE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS LD # 18-1182 FOR ALL WORK OUT OF R/W Checked By repared Under Supervision Of Date RECOMMENDED BY.- DATE: ACCEPTED BY: DATE: PATRICK THOMAS, PE DIRECTOR OF PUBUC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER R.C.E, No. 44223 0 LD IB-11BO BUILDING AND SAE MTY REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS AND ACCESSIBILITY ONLY. CITY OF TEMECULA PA 17-1642-SANBORN AVENUE PARKING LO -1 PARCEL 11 PM 23561 PRECISE GRADING PLAN Drawing -A o. 3 PG-3 Sheet 3 of 5 18" WIDE CONC. .� PLANTER 21.5' (� "STEPOUT" CURB DETAIL NOT TO SCALE VARIES 8 k TRANSITION 'O DETAIL "STEPOUT" TO CURB TRANSITION DETAIL - NOT TO SCALE 1080 1070 1060 1050 1040 1030 1080 1070 1060 1050 1040 1030 0 z 0< 0 I� w 0. I CAS T� PARKWAY I t bsa . EQL PAE,6 TRArFIC I Q3 III . .TRAFFtC 1 ,14. lbs.. z ..CATCH BASIN .w .. ............................... ..2 =4 10 24" X 24" CATCH 8ATN N.r,s. TING SURFACE z cr_ z z a. `0-_ 01 z M CL w 0-3-8.5# � ® �' 1080 1070 1€60 1050 1040 1030 ORCO AQUA -BRIO PERMEABLE INTERLOCKING PAVERS STANDARD COMMERCIAL PARKING LOT/DRIVEWAY LOADINGS AQUA—BRIC INSTALLATION FOR REQUIRED WATER DETENTION JOINT AND VOID FILLER 2" TO 4" MIN. BASE COURSE 1/4" - 3/8" WASHED ORCOSTONE 80 MM. 3/4" WASHED FRACTURED FRACTURED AQUA-BRIC PAVER W/ 1/4i' HAND OPEN -GRADED STONE PER OPEN -GRADED STONE PE TIGHT JOINTS PRODUCT AND ASTIR ASTM NO.8 LAYOUT AS SPECIFIED PROVIDE NO, 57 RASE REQUIREMENTS. REQUIREMENTS. 1%%% MIN. TO 5%%% MAX. POURED CONCRETE CURB 2" BEDDING COURSE SLOPE SEE SHEET PS-4 FOR 1/4"-3/8" WASHED FRACTURED SLOPING CONDITIONS OPEN -GRADED STONE PER ff�. T ft 0 ASTfI NO. REQUIREMENTS.REQUIREMENTS.URF ` ; f 6 •iJ;.z +.#r"4r„J''- '_''[.tClf`�_ jL..ek''••w-.�5.,��v 7 % �..� - . (�!c}- - r•�'•F!r7d a i� }° �' { 'r7�. �' �'ri r'"`} '� ��'G� . , � �r �'I•ar r `�rry; � y r: r '< `y;;!' rh- ✓" 12; + e . C J '' fit'! .t ? �Q' �) : ;..a... -. CF ay.y' -C r 3- e..�a' ,d is -}' �` §yV'`' 1, ^' h- '-- '-' � �.:..-.�"'•. N'" ; .' .,.� j� " � y -.�'I • ., � �w, ...,1 ` f .. f l;,', ..� + •-. '- 1' `-1 f � r + - '� Ii . ,mil � s r�.�.�. I �. �.�.rs ' "" t I �..��1 "-- ` � �'wyJf� + r� r` 1 ,Sti.. „ �.�'--f'F�"�� � `� � [ C-..� f �f •�.>;,t_...���� � � � _ � _ f�;;.1r f , /' •i .:.�\ J• Z. ffM.- ii�--^.^..rr `�r-` i '""'� �a..�✓•1`i'•' i � j� f 1 • �-.f '"^'� �. f'; • f 1f' M_,.r :; .,sr :1'F 6" PVC CAR S€ R 35 PERF V PIPE FRENCH DRAIN .-.OUTFALL SURROUNDED 1:��l �� � � �� �� � � ---- � � � ' < WITH NO. S STONE _ - - WHERE RECaUiI"iE® - SEE -- >" CHART ON SE-2. SLOPE SUB -BASE COURSE t 1f2" -3" TO ��CLEANED FRACTURED OPEN-_� DRAIN. GRADED STONE PER ASTi�I NO.2 90% COMPACTED FILL OR SUBBASE REQUIREMENTS. NATURAL SOIL.. SUBGRADE STANDARD INSTALLATION WITH CONCRETE CURB EDGE RESTRAINT POURED CONCRETE GRADE BEAM HOLD PAVERS 1/8" TO 3/8" ABOVE POURED CONCRETE DRAINAGE W/ #4 REBAR TOP AND BOTTOM POURED CONCRETE DRAINAGE SWALE SWALE/CURB A/C PAVI MIN. . HOLD PAVERS 1/8" TO 3/8" ABOVE POURED CONCRETE DRAINAGE SALE `•� It ! � � .r l� i � 4L 3 !.•..f ` •l i l � � E � •� �. � i. „r✓-•-�..• f i ^ i i co CRETE GRADE BEAD RETE DRAINAGE SA►L RB JO55ITE CONDITIONS VARY,EACH PERMEABLE PAVEMENT DESIGN AND INSTALLATION MUST 3E APPROVED BY THE RESPONSIBLE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL — SEE COMPLETE DISCLAIMER ON BACK OF FRONT COVER M 1060 EX,BUILDINC DL LMDM MDWE 0 PARKING AREA AREA \�'BLS TING SURFACE E 1050 0 z Z XISTINC SURFACE CL z a. z < a. < z < � z ^ f W CD • • �� • • • • • t a • • • 0- . • e Z' i • • . e < • . a • e l • a • • i 1 e� • • • e • • t • CL x •_ . • • • • • y W CL ROIL. FINISH SURFACE CONSTRUCTION RECORD Contractor Inspector Cate Completed F 66532 VeI1coi . . CIVIL Datigned By ITILFREW10r.D. TEA s . s ...'.� Checked By repared Under Supervision Of Date 1080 1070 1060 1050 1040 1030 SECTION "C-C" SCALE: 1 "=1 C" DRIVE ISLE w D EXIMDM PARKING _. �.. _ ... to w_ AREA . 1050 1 O 9 FINISH SURFACE XISTINC SURFACE SECTION "D-D" SCALE: 1"=10' RECOMMENDED BY: . DATE. - ACCEPTED BY.- DATE: E► PATRICK THOMAS, PE DIRECTOR OF 'PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. No. 44223 DRIVE ISLE #.I f-� WDID# LD 0 {: w COMPLIANCE AND ACCESSIBILITY ONLY. CITY OF TEMECULA I Drawing No. 4 ..,. PA 17 164—SANBORN AVENUE PARKING LOT PG-4 PM 23561 —1 PARCEL 11 DETAILS & SITE SECTIONS Sheetof O EXISTIN EXISTING G 16 ACC' Contractor" Inspector Date Completed BENCH MARK . - ; Drown By Checked By ,7epared Under. Of Date ■ NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE ILTER FABRIC 20 POUND SANDBAGS AT EACH CORNER EXTEND 12" MIN BEYOND INLET OPENING AROUND PERIMETER CROSS SECTION V 1. DAILY INSPECTION SHALL BE MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SILT ACCUMULATION MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPTH REACHES 2 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR THE PERFORMANCE OF INLET PROTECTION DURING EACH RAINFALL EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY CLEAN THE INLET PROTECTION IF EXCESSIVE PONDING OCCURS. 3. INLET PROTECTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED AS SOON AS THE SOURCE OF SEDIMENT IS STABILIZED. ►. A A SCALENO 2. STAPLE THE FILTER FABRIC TO THE FENCE. J%N0ff GAP BEN BAGS ACTS AS SPILLWAY THREW LAYERS OF GRAVEL BAGS TH ENDS OVERLAPPED 2' MIN, 3' MAX. .......... NO SCALE NOTE: THE SILT FENCE SHOULD BE SUPPORTED BY A ORE MESH IF THE FILTER FABRIC DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT STRENGTH AND 'BURSTING STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS (AS RECOMMENDED BY TIME FABRIC MANUFACTURER) RECOMMENDED BY: F. ACCEPTED DATE: DIRECTOROF !' . 3' MIN. WDID# 9 33C383592 1•j, REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS AND ACCESSIBtl.tiY ONLY, APPROVED BY: DATE: PA 17-1642-SANBORN AVENUE PARKING LOT PM 23561-1 PARCEL 11 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Orowing Ro. 5 Sleet -5- of 5 CONSTRUCTION VOTES 0 DESCRIPTION 4 ? EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED ___.,__.M_-..._.___...._.._...__.._....__.._.._..._..-.-___..._ __...._........-. _-......__ ...____._ _.._..-_.__............ ...._.._..-_. ____--..........._ _.._ ADA ACCESS RAMPS FOR ALL INTERSECTIONS PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD. 48 SF f DWG NO.402 TRUNCATED DOMES ONLY 4 1 S" RCP PIPE, CLASS Ili SEE ON —SITE PRECISE 55 LF GRADING PLAN LD1 8_11 8O FOR MORE INFORMATION 17 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD. DWG NO.207A 3O PROTECT ITEM NOTED 31 PROTECT ITEM NOTED AND ADJUST TO NEW GRADE WHERE APPLICABLE ..... ......................... .... ....... ........... ............. ------------- _-._---- ............... ......_.....__.__......._..._......... ............ ........._.-.--._--....__._....._.-_..,.. ......_...__....._..--.,...w-...t.._.__.-__.....,-,.............-_.....-_._.......... 32 _.-...----•-'-..-_--_._r._..............._....,,...,.-..._...-..-_.----'. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 137 LF _._._.._.........._ 33 .. _-_.._._.__---. _--._---.-------_..._.___....._.__._..__.__--.-.--.._------___....-__...-.-._..-_..----_....__. __..._.-..__.._.._........-._-_.._--..___--.-----_ i T ACT PER DETAILS ON E SHEET T TO �E REMOVED �� CONTRACTOR E EXISTING UTILITY _w .....---.- ----------- 1 E A 35 __..-_.._-..-..... 3 SA CUT AND REMOVE 5'X5' CONCRETE WALK. -.._...-.-.-.-- _.._..__.__._..-._..... ....._..... _..-.--................- _--._. w.......... _......... -._...._.__...._...-.............__...._...._.-....__._ _w..._--._..._..__........._... - -.__..-.......... .... 225 SF .... ...................... ..... __.._...-..__...-......_w-.... 35 I N SKEET 2 UT PER DETA L �3 SAWCUT _-_..-......._......_......--.....,-,-._.....—......_......_.....---.._-..._..._......_..........-._—"'---'_.-......_.....-......-..--.-.._._-........:.........._..............-__.......-._.......--....__..-..___-..........._....._-....._......._,..-..---......___-_.....___..-_.-._...._..,....--..._-..-...__.....-_..-._—,..--.. 1 �' LF .....-.._-....._._........_-_....j..-__.--_ 37 -....-.-..-._-_-.-......-....-m....__._._ ................_._.-.-...-.,.........._.._-..__.-__... _..._--....-....._. SIDEWALK PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD. DWG NO.4O1 _ ..-.-...-._-_..--------_-_--------..---..........-._.-..._.__......--..-.-. _.- _....._..._._ _._.._. 2FSO5 _-_.. SF _ - . - '-..-_.-.. 3 ' ADA ACCESS RAMPS FOR ALL INTERSECTIONS PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD. 1 EA DWG NO.4O2 .............__._.-.__-....-._....n.__......._..-_..-.-._..-.........___..._....r_.__..---•._-.-..._..._.._.. _-_._................... ... 39 . _ PARALLEL CURB RAMP PER DETAIL ON SHEET 21 EA 40 6F' CURB TYPE "D-6" PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD. 2O4A - _ - _ ........ 23 LF 41 TYPE C CURB PER CITY STD.202 _......_....-..... ..- _w-..m_._......_....._....._............._..-._...........-...-_...-...�.-.-_. -... _..._......_---------r._._..... 92 LF .._...-. ....e._. u_.-.. ...-.-. — .-..-...._.-_................. ..__....__._ _..-...._.__.....-._._........._-..._..... — 42 WEIGHTED FIBER ROLL PER DETAIL ON SHEET 3 203 LF SHE InEx TITLE SHEET & INDEX{ MAP ............................ s...........*........../� STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN LAN..►.................i6.i....0a96bLR>fi. P0Yl1.ie.. a.is EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ..... ................:3 CAUTION: THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AND SHALT. REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. *CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITY LATERALS AND SHALT.. NOTIFY ENGINEERS IF THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THIS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IN ORDER FOR THE ENGINEERS TO MAKE THE PLAN CHANCES. CONSTRUCTION RECORD I DATE, BY REVISIONS ACC' BENCH MARK Contractor Inspector Date Completed 551 ,gam y1 5 1 60 ,:aye a, `- i "a. 9. P910-272-011 TOPOGRAPHIC SOURCE TOPOGRAPHY #ELTA SURVEYING & MAPPING JEFFERSON AV State MURRIETA CA 92562 .► . 94! SCALE ` . ..} a Vertical No 6653 Exp. 6-30-20 CIL 9ILFIR'EU0*V.D. VEN R.C.E. No. 66532 Wrepared Under Supervision Of RECOMMENDED BY. DATE. ACCEPTED BY: DATE; PATRICK THOMAS, PE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER R.G.E. No. 44223 i .00 ALE 1 11 DESCRIBED BY METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT SO. CALIFORNIA 1992 RANCHO CALIFORNIA 0.6 MILE 1.0 KM SOUTHWEST ALONG STATE HWY 79 FROM THE INTERSECTION WITH MARGARITA RD. AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HWY 79 AND AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, 115.5 FF FEET (35.2 M} SOUTH OF THE DX551 D CENTERLINE OF HWY 796 53.5 FEET (15.3 M) WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, 9.5 FEET (2.9 M) WEST OF CURB FACE. 2 FEET (0.6 M) WEST OF STREET LIGHT STANDARD. A STANDARD MWDSC 3-1/4 INCH BRASS DISK SET IN TOP OF A 8 INCH DIAMETER CONCRETE F _ 'GROUND. L= 1 D43.91 feet O.1 FOOT ABOVE GR ND E POST (feet) LEGEND FIRE HYDRANT AC ASPHALT PAVEMENT ° - LIGHT TO TOP OF GRATE . v LANDSCAPE FS FINISHED SURFACE METER, PULL BOX R/W RIGHT OF WAY EX. CONCRETE C G CURB AND GUTTER PROP. CONCETE PL — PROPERTY LINE ' M WATER METER EC EDGE OF CONCRETE FH FIRE HYDRANT DO PROPOSED GRADE FL FLOWLIN 100 EXIST CURB XI5T. A.C. PVM7 & GUTTER 2% 2% _ _ _ 2% EXIST. 5' SIDEWALK MADISON AVENUE SANBORN AVENUE EXIST. 6" CURB&GUTTER N.T.S. WDID# 9 330383592 LD 1 11 8 CITY OF TEMECULA Drawing No. PA 7—642- SANBORN AVE PARKING LOT -1-PARCEL 11 PG PM 23561 STREET REST IMPROVEMENT PLAN TITLE E SHEET Sheet 1of � CONSTRUCTION RECORD Contractor Inspector Date Completed �j -END STA: 14+ 42.96 EC (51.47) 170NUMEM I A101: Q F-1 (G 49.27) IPI 41 11, 1�1 0. PLANTING OR OTHER 41 NON —WALKING SURFACE OR PROTECT __41 4; IP li, _1'k 49. �P_ DROP OFF FL49.20 (TYP) IN. 5'M R p AM v 41 TURNING Nk Nk 941 941 111// e 3 000, 100N 1104)tcVR 40 -41, SPACE FL4 •.18 ti It, 41 TYPE III- & M x 49-23 40 CF) 40 ...... TC49 0 (3 0 lf� FL49.07 1Y j,., q, JYO MAX. -41 .41 41 z 49..03 gyp J PARALLEL CURB RAMP I!, . .... ... ... NO SCALE A> 41 -N 14, 4-9.05 �oe & .41 `000 1" FULL AC PLUG Q4 .5 FL49.25 FS EX. CURB AND GUTTER Z LJ 4 ROPOSED ADA PATH A EXISTING AC Z LL- 0 36 32 & BULB OUT e, PAVEMENT& BASE 5.V) LI IT F DEMO 0- _4 W� .0 FULL AC 77­ 8.o PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT & SAS E SAWCUT DETAIL LN NO SCALE 3 SAWCUT LINE IS LIMITS OF DEMO 11A X C.> o' N (0 % i ro 23.0' C&G EL TO BE RqMOVED Z Poo #j, JCv NG 1, 0 FU LL .00 AC PLUG NO 5.5 bro SO eye o" 19, 6 .40yt>t 0 . ... .. A N Xl TIN AREA T-2 WILL BE REMOVED 1A v EC (50.75) 44 BW 50-87 STA: 15+00 X EC (51-32) BW 51.44 00 Ile) SEE SHEET 1 40 60 0 10 20 . . ..... ..... -------- .. . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IN FEET 1 inch = 20 ft. SCALE SEAL: Horizontal 12, I I I Vertical No. SM2 Exp. 6-3D-20 k CIVIL . I 11ILFREIM�..". D. -TEATIF 66532 C) 00 PLUG PROP, SIDEWALK& TYPE "C" CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD.401 & 202 CONCRETE APRON DETAIL B SCALE 1:10 `X 'N N 0 V "o 0 .5, FULL AC 0 4 PLUG 4P N kP . ................. v*& Ow MOW A I a AML \k 41 q, w 'k J, .1. 0, v 'u SCALE 1: 10 WDID# 9 33C383592 LD 18-1182 j Drawing No. C ITY OF TEMECULA ------- ------ PA 17-1642-SANBORN AVE PARKING LOT 23561-1-PARCEL 11 . . ......... .. .............. S STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN Sheet -2— of--3— SCALE 1 4- 10 Water Quality Management Pert Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Flap 23 61-1, Pry _ Appendix I, Soils Inf6rmation GeotechnkaiStudy and Other InfiltrationTesting Data Em �r� � �� �. 1 � 1 May 12, 2015 Paul and Andy Laubach PROVIDENCE If MADISON AVENUE PLAZA,"LLC 183 Calle Magdelena Suite 100 Encinitas, CA 92024 Project No. 15302-IOA Subj ect: Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report, Proposed Parking Lot, Assessor"s Parcel Number 910-272-011, Parcel Number 11 of Parcel Map Number 23561-1, Located at 41427 Sanborn Avenue, City of Temecula, Riverside County, California Earth -Strata is pleased to present our preliminary cote finical interpretive -report for the proposed parking lot, Assessor's Parcel Number 910-272-011, Parcel Number 11 of Parcel Map Number 23561-1, located at 41427 Sanborn Avenue, in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. This work was performed in accordance with the scope of work described in our proposal, dated April 20, 2015. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature, distribution, engineering properties, and geologic strata underlying the site with respect to the proposed development. Earth -Strata appreciates the opportunity to offer our consultation and advice on this project. In the event that you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, IEA PCIM -STIR, ATA, Inic, I DistrjbUdOW (2) Addressee TILE F ONJS,YM INTRODUCTION.... .tx 4 w{ f SITE DESCRIPTION .................arrr wS<f v4trYY. i#�444tPY%:45<, 4y}v 55 n,',v, >>r<[Cbhslv,y PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND GRADING .....e...4#x..i<[[aib:};YFYi{ii4?bbYY.v4Y++wnnverawxx%<:i.b>YYxx<.:R..A?Yx 4,XXrrrr49Rllzrrr9nhsvvl FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING . ..kl.aYrr.<,.b.R3lXxx Yx3 v.� +w-cai.vrve YY sYv, vS.,.!: vn rni{.§i333YFY.-.tttca3-s ti'[[<[.a�: .a....'ibSaii Yn_zvtii-0�40YY u}TTrr-.i i n>y <i<•44++4?vv YS SX)Y 4 ♦id4vvx nAr§i4 v+Y Field xpffi lorationSYx<<:e:eess....:..i.....3 ✓� LaboratoryTesting .................... sYr S..t ktrtrrrvveS445}5avx.,n{iii Vv, ni{§488YM iii §4843 }> v iYYva p�q} FINDINGS.. idrv#A 4{Rtr3Y>Yi S4Rtr Y?Yvv S, ri444r i{i#488 YXi 5niniv Regional Geology.................. a?sYi {iv3b} fi43y}v ih` 46i 23.!!Y 944R1s i LocalGeology. 3}YY +42:kktr}YY xv.i v4VYi. a#6V3i a§Fi4F ssvrr [++.nnaa vvv>+ .FiiA>. % s<4.S.4�k !!X .. ! L.4vrxa _ ri36, r..si 11;e4 GeologicStructure ...... rvvrrnn avv§6�S5 a♦ _ i-0#bb}y�Y _ n)v a<v <i�4 i#R#Yy'y S441:X. rYn a{§ivv._i rA{i§: §'ib }eeFx"i�4 z p L�rrdird�4eOr i§4§}ib i-0#4S 43h apvvr Ri4i8VYr miiab} tt 44ai a CONCLUSIONS S DRECOMMENDATIONS.......,.:{ibL}. i4aaFs+i zvvv„nnsi{ti#bbYrxrdi43SFF.;[4333aw hr 444#:> ,i.pYY t General 4'. 4 k 1 1.44R••GYY1 +49994441 1 1 4 6 4 Y I 1 1 +4 Earthwork..................... ..............nzz.s <:ir45Sa>Y:i:t si§3YYSi 4#'1'i .v{4•MAk YrtSi{44tX Y. r+.4Mti iYr enrvaitiv iv rr.i '.t.§ swrwrrn,a: gs iny.. '6 arthworkan Grading Earthwork an Clearing and Grubbing................4 >.i<F 5::, 4#4} knz 'nbi{{i4§:•i-Y YR{44bY ,. 46 Excavation Characteristics a{R33}+ r,S S444Y+ S4S4kz 244ay 44 dvYL. RLY Yi444RfF Y6 round aterp... h............ ... Ground Preparation 0.D•:n FOAL FillAreas ...................... ... i.§#4:1} 5: 1:.4ka4tx..v.-{ nfv n§'.i'ibbbr % {iii88: �Y. .... v'✓. OversizeRock ................................4M}p♦f v4aa vMxn44 t{888}x9iibg3} 444•YYxsii4#7 Compacted Fill Placement+- . a{{AD} rSi{s4}:r Siry +zzzfi:v+awcAA:{Si #abY>.{s:,{{2431. x. ..... .. ... 4'i .1 YLY? 1, 4Rt:.}:Yr e94 f Y� ImportEarthRv Materials ... -:. .... r. +_{. xnnzzs'v Y+. nw_4 VV aannxzSt ........ %rr.Y.. )r:vv raaxv".i. }a .ii ev.Y}Y SSi544.}Yvu f.s .ss ngxa Cut/Fill Transitions _ ...... SYY%[ t4tr}Yxr Cut real. ...... Shrinkage, e, ulkin and Subsidence .................................n.4 tram i,kL9 4:54:44Rfifi Y+ rSa 43tr3r'.Y A+t4224 Ylv i:i ills•}}}:t Ge€rt chnlcal Observations xaa r.nn .apyry� .+' ,gym Post GradingConsiderations v 42 vr♦ 4AvaYa,>Y.44?}Y}v++.S44ty 4� Slope Landscaping and Maintenance. 4A3.Y ,4ktrtr Site Drainage ....... <. 33 }itr {4Y, ia4rr <{cma4r} ..s UtilityTrenches . +4+d}. .......n4{tv.V.V Y+axx,4.{:ro94a b}S.[Cbib}i... >rr _ i{ 4,40YYt}r Y:S 4RL }{l [k0 1�?.�' Secondary Seismic Hazards Y}:K<4§#A4:Ked33YTYKY[ry53Y+ . r[nwi4y.v.arY4 4m,b P.rr4<: xn.wi. 3xn<4 xx%,4 :AYYG%%%{<i.43,x.rrr[44.t3YrYrK Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading ...............<[e4#i .sLL. wuvv iAAi, nn<44Y 44 ��•"fp' y@�tple Y�pg v,++i.+x.af9vr.v Da.ern,9::i.§.Atria KK<4§>:-ixxv<94•':t} xxvv <n w>+wn6::44AA}b:>: :[[ C asy. !•vYnE tl.pI�AL84W'r6R.l.Ysaaaaa:K%aeeeeP.YKKK eCbiiY}v vS['o:+S 3-YtYvv�V +.3+s+�z.v:i4 vrv'+w :[.44 :43> - General �:: Allowable Bearing Values.......+ SYr ii. 11yyY Settlement............... i#h.V}rr x<S kryh3 vv• Y,innavy +vvwsav#4}}s. r,tm hbYv: xnn r4vv rxn a <f 44 YYYa rSLiOYYt b Literal Resistance..eeeeeee..4..e44andiA.4Y,ixY.KKii33Ys%[Sbm33,TY%9>.4.3YY:: 4�}r>)r+F. nYvv vY.xnxaF<4Av aSakx R:4144•YYt%%KKK940:>i'>Y 4[S:C55fY' Structural Setbacks and Building Clearance v K=a+>b>xa[tC . <11.4•!i 4 KKt[.ry)Sx Y [ .i . Foundation Observations ..e......bt YXrv+ x {. "Expansive Soil Considerations 5xxxx.wr4)X.XYrY.+ .xx#k� YYYx . _ .1 Very Low Expansion Potential (Expansion Index of 20 or Less) .... .[< d#trYA)a[r.443 YYYYri:r 33YY4vrrn,�4 Footings < ... BuildingFloor Slabs......... vvv +aranzs vvvvxi+:ss483i'a.+ii§833?s%r+i •bi3avv v+++a%x 444v iYv <444tF naiv Ga aiazei b§S YSY+•{t24a s} r<, :rrrnn w:{id}a, n�Aiii§+Y t:i FA[4#3.a FhtF+K9-'S<aa ry5 sn': ar++.i;-ivvrr+ri-zu5vvv i.:rx,i ,[44,5.44h )Y'v .„:. SS r 44h t.?:v rr..n,:nr v4vx Y. s zid dh i:� i 9:{•.fY SYYY_:.i_ [ .:Y.i., r++{n._<,. . 15Corrusrvrty.4 RETAINING WALLS ..........................E:.4 44hhh xtr h'}'f i'xx v'4i#ivw ti•§•S}Y v4v Y.48}}YY't2n3k?��./ :.� 1E RTHI-STRTA, INC. Page ai Project No. 1 802-10 SIE N The subject property is located at 41427 Sanborn Avenue in the City of Temecula, Riverside County California. The approximate location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1e The subject property is comprised of undeveloped lend. The site has been graded.. Topographic relief a the subject property is relatively low with the terrain being generally flat. Drainage within the subject property generally flaws to the west. The site is currently bordered by commercial. Most of the vegetation on the site consists of sparse amounts of annual weeds/grasses. The proposed parking lot is to consist of asphaltic concrete pavement and Portland cement with associated w..o: oR . ::� landscape The plans provided by you were utilized in our exploration and form the base for our Geotechnical Map, Plate 1., Formal plans w ::' been .rr.: prepared ..s..a:.': and await conclusions and recommendations :: .+.:s ::A o report. i� ��jff 4aY . i {}f.:'d £c S� t a'�%ks�ir� ���+�{ Field..Exvlora . Subsurface exploration within the subject site was performed on May 12, 2015 for the exploratory excavations. A truck mounted hollow -stern -auger drill rig was utilized to drill 3 borings throughout the site to a maximum depth of 11.5feet.. An underground utilities clearance was obtained from Underground Service Alert of Southern California, prior to the subsurface exploration. Earth materials encountered during exploration were classified and logged in general accordance with the Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -manual Procedure) of A.S'TM D 2400. Upon completion of laboratory testing, 'exploratory lags and sample descriptions may have been reconciled to reflect laboratory test results with regard to A1ST M D 2487. Associated with the subsurface exploration was the collection of bulk (disturbed) samples and relatively undisturbed samples of earth materials for laboratory testing and analysis. The relatively undisturbed samples were obtained with a 3 inch outside diameter modified California split -spoon sampler lined with 1 inch high brass rings. Samples obtained using a hollow stern auger drill rig, were mechanically driven'' with successive' 30 inch drops of a 140'-pound trip safety hammer. The blow count per one font increment was recorded in the boring logs. The central portions of the driven samples were placed in sealed' containers and 'transported to our laboratory for testing' and analysis. The approximate exploratory locations are shown on Plate 1 and descriptive lags are presented in Appendix B. toTesitne Maximum dry density/optimum moisture content, expansion potential, P.-value pH, resistivity, sulfate content, chloride content, and in -situ density/moisture content were determined for selected undisturbed and bulb samples of earth materials, considered representative of those encountered. An evaluation of the test data is reflected throughout the Conclusions and Recommendations section of this report. A brief description of laboratory test criteria and summaries of test data are presented in Appendix C. 3 Project Number 15802-10A The mountainous regions within the Peninsular Ranges Province are comprised of Pre -Cretaceous, ietasedirnentary, and metavoleanie rocks along with Cretaceous plutonic rocks of the Southern California Batholith, The low lying areas are primarily comprised of Tertiary and Quaternary non -marine alluvial sediments consisting of alluvial deposits, sandstones, el yst nes, siltstones, conglomerates, and occasional volcanic units. A wrap illustrating the regional geology is presented on the Regional Geologic Map, Figure 20 The earth materials on the site are primarily comprised of artificial fill, and Quaternary alluvial materials. A general description of the dominant earth materials observed on the site is provided below: Artificial Flll lndocumented r-xa symbol Undocumented artificial fill materials were encountered throughout the site within the upper 5 feet during exploration. 'These 'materials are typically locally derived from the native material's and consist generally of yellowish brown clayey sand. These materials are generally inconsistent, well consolidated fills. tracer . r° yours. rx e B its xbdl a Quaternary old faux deposits were encountered to a maximum depth explored. These alluvial deposits consist predominately of ,gray brown, fine to coarse grained sand interlayered with sandy silt. Thee deposits were generally noted to be in a moist, medium dense.. 1LC it.rntur The alluvium is generally massive to horizontally layered and lacks significant structural planes.. Landslide debris was not observed during our subsurface exploration and no ancient landslides are known to exist on the site. CONCLUSIOUNNAND Ala M EN - From geotechnical and engineering geologic points of view, the subject property is considered suitable for the proposed development, provided the following conclusions and recommendations are incorporated into the plans and are implemented during construction. ................OWN. ]EARTIHI-SIFIRLATA, NNC 4 ?fir{7 C i:Y<k<J :}.........:...:....:......::.....::::::::::::::::...........:.........:: ;........ ... :. .......:: .......:: ........ ....................................................... ::. ................ ......::: .......::.... ........ . %�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:i....................{{•i:%•iiiiiiiiiiiiiii:%•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:J•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii: •••• ���� "; ::::::::::::: ..... r..., v.. ...,::::........... •....::: rv., rr.n ..., ,.. r: •::::::::: JJ.•i: .r ....n......:::::::::::: .. J...... x..::::...v r...... Y:... .... JJ.•ii •.v ........:::::::::::::::. •iiiiiiiiiiii :::: •: •:: Jr :::.......... ........... ...} ... {:f:i/: , {.:: •:..... ..<l. l:....................... is :}.. .... .::. :: {{{fb{ •:: Fff •Y': "';;'fr•r,:•{{ •: •f: ".;:%i '•. ""%f.. {{ J•::{,, ,?.{. . ,.r. ::::::: J .{{`{kf ..,fr „} .k k.h{.. �,?.{..F.Ya.�#f.,„fr.,..{.,F,,rrli.•.tv'�H,... rr,F,FF/.::::::::::::::: � " ::::::: v::..�4�L.{•:�rF...:...r.f....:...%:..f...,.......:ff................................. : .:: ,.. .. ":�. .. ,;r: �....r ... . r: . .. ::...: .... ..: MA : . .............. rr� i.r.rr..4.4":ii.v.F'.Fi:a:....rJ.4.J...rr..s.n}r.....f.ya............................................................:.: :: .::: ...:...:: ......:: ......::: .....:::: ...:...:: .......::.:: ii Earthwolrk- Eart EDW Excay4gH. . On Cha EamEmi ALIC-1—S Based on the results of our exploration and experience with similar projects in similar settings, the near surface earth materials, will be readily excavated with conventional earth moving equipment. Groundwater was not observed during our subsurface exploration. G . rgund P I reparatiali,foar-EflIf —Areas For each area to receive compacted fill, the removal of low density, compressible earth materials, such as topsoil, upper alluvial materials, and undocumented artificial fill, should continue until firm competent alluvium is encountered. Removal excavations are subject to verification by the project engineer, geologist or their representative. Prior to placing compacted fills, the exposed bottom in each removal area should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches or more, watered or air dried as necessary to achieve near optimum moisture conditions and then compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D 1557. The intent of remedial grading is to diminish the potential for hydro -consolidation, slope instability, and/or settlement. Remedial grading should extend beyond the perimeter of the proposed structures a horizontal distance equal to the depth of excavation or a minimum of 5 feet, whichever is greater. For cursory purposes the anticipated removal depths are shown on the enclosed Geotechnical Map, Plate 1. In general, the anticipated removal depths should vary from 2 to 4 feet below existing grade. ]EARTH-SICRA`7FA, 6 May 12, 2015 Project Number 15802-10A Wet: Rem.D. va Is Wet alluvial materials will probably not be encountered within the low lying areas of the site. If removals of wet alluvial materials are required, special grading equipment and procedures can greatly reduce overall costs. Careful planning by an experienced grading contractor can reduce the need for special equipment, such as swamp cats, draglines, excavators, pumps, and top loading earthmovers. Possible solutions may include the placement of imported angular rock and/or geotextile ground reinforcement. More specific recommendations can be provided based on the actual conditions encountered. Drying or mixing of wet materials with dry materials will be needed to bring the wet materials to near optimum moisture prior to pla'cing wet materials into compacted fills. I.; _GverS'zg_Ro Oversize rock is not expected to be encountered during grading. Oversize rock that is encountered (i.e., rock exceeding a maximum dimension of 12 inches) should be disposed of offsite or stockpiled onsite and crushed for future use. The disposal of oversize rock is discussed in greater detail in General Earthwork and Grading Specifications within the last appendix of this report. acted. Fil Compacted fill materials should be placed in 6 to 8 inch maximum (uncompacted) lifts, watered or air dried as necessary to achieve uniform near optimum moisture content and then compacted to a minimum of 9® percent of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D 1557. Should import earth materials be needed to achieve final design grades, all potential import materials should be free of deleterious /oversize materials, non -expansive, and approved by the project geotechnical consultant prior to delivery onsite. '"ill. Ste, When properly constructed, fill slopes up to 10 feet high with inclinations of 2:1 (h:v) or flatter are considered to be grossly stable. Keyways are required at the toe of all fill slopes higher than 5 feet and steeper than 5:1 (h:v). Keyways should be a minimum of 10 Ifeet wide and 2 feet into competent earth materials, as measured on the downhill side. In order to establish keyway removals, backcuts should be cut no steeper than 1:1 or as recommended by the geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist. Compacted fill should be benched into competent earth materials. w. ---------------- — ----------- CUVHII i-rawkwo Cut/fill transitions should ' be eliminated from all building areas where the depth of fill placed within the "fill" portion exceeds proposed footing depths. This is to diminish distress to structures resulting from excessive differential settlement. The entire foundation of each structure should be founded on a uniform bearing material. This should be accomplished by overexcavating the "cut" portion and replacing the excavated materials as properly compacted fill. Refer to the following table for recommended depths ®f overexcavation. Overexcavation of the "cut" portion should extend beyond the building perimeter a horizont distance equal to the depth of overexcavation or a minimum of 5 feet, whichever is greater. I ------------------------------- MINIMUM I ........ monsoon )EARTIHI-STRATAt INC 8 May 12, 2015 Project Number 15802-10A Subsidence from scarification and recompaction of exposed bottom surfaces is expected to be negligible to approximately 0.01 foot. The estimates of shrinkage /bulking and subsidence are intended as an aid for project engineers in determining earthwork quantities. Since many variables can affect the accuracy of these estimates, they should be used with caution and contingency plans should be in place for balancing the project. J The project geotechnical consultant or his representative should be present to observe grading operations and to check that minimum compaction requirements and proper lift thicknesses are being met, as well as to verify compliance with the other recommendations presented herein. p t on.sider-ations Adequate slope and building pad drainage is essential for the long term performance of the subject site, The gross stability of graded slopes should not be adversely affected, provided all drainage provisions are properly constructed and maintained. Engineered slopes should be landscaped .................. ................ ]EARTIHI-STIFLATA, INC. 9 May 12, 2015 Project Number 15802-10A with deep rooted, drought tolerant maintenance free plant species, as recommended by the project landscape architect, 'bite , gradedAt a minimum, pad drainage should be designed at the minimum gradients required by the CBC. To divertwater away from foundations, the ground surface adjacent to foundations should also be gradients In order to minimize the penetration of moisture below building dabs, all utility trenches should' be baekfilled with compacted fill, lean concrete or concrete slurry where they undercut the perimeter foundation. Utility trenches that are proposed parallel to any building footings (interior and/or exterior trenches), should not be located within a 1:1 (h':v) plane projected downward from the outside bottom edge of the footing. 5!e-C_q11daXX,,5gi&ni1c-Hazatds Secondary effects of seismic shaking considered as potential hazards include several types of ground failure as well as induced flooding. Different types of ground failure, which could occur as a consequence of severe ground shaking at the site, include 'landslides, ground lurching, shallow ground rupture, and liquefaction/lateral spreading. The probability of occurrence of each type of ground failure depends on the severity of the earthquake, distance from faults, topography, the state of subsurface earth materials, -roundwater conditions, and other factors. used on our experience, subsurface exploration, and aaboratory testing, all of the above secondary effects of seismic activity are considered unlikely. L igg e f_ .agfiM.&kd L-Snread.InLy Liquefaction occurs as a result of a substantial loss of shear strength or shearing resistance in loose, saturated, cohesionless 'earth materials subjected to earthquake induced ground shaking. Potential' impacts from liquefaction include loss of bearing capacity, liquefaction related settlement, lateral movements, and surface manifestation such as sand boils, Seismically induced settlement occurs when loose sandy sails become denserwhen subjected to shaking during an earthquake. The three factors determining whether a site is likely to be subject to liquefaction "include seismic shaking, type and consistency of earth materials, and groundwater level. No proposed structures are proposed. Provided grading is performed in accordance with the recommendations of this report, shallow foundations are considered feasible for 'support of the proposed structures. Tentative foundation recommendations are provided herein and graphic presentations of relevant recommendations may also be included on the enclosed rape :ll alp ai Ing An allowable bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot (pso is recommended for design of 24 inch square pad footings and 12 'inch pride continuous footings founded' at a minimum depth of "12 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade. This value may be increase. by 20 percent for each additional 1-foot of width 'and/or depth' to a' maximum value of 2,500 psi Recommended allowable bearing values' include both dead and frequently applied' live' loads and may be increased by one third when designing' for short duration wind or seismic forces'. Based on the settlement characteristics of the earth materials that underlie the building 'sites and the anticipated loading, we estimate that the maximum total settlement of the footings will be 'less than approximately 3/4 inch. Differential settlement is expected to be about '�2 inch over a horizontal distance of approximately 20' feet, for an angular distortion ratio of 1:480. It is anticipated that the majority of the -ettlement'will occur~ during construction or shortly after the initial application of loading, )EA1UFIH1-S1 ' , z<T,A� ]INC. . 11 _ May 12, 2 15 Project Number 15802-10 The above settlement estimates are based on the assumption that the grading and construction are Derformed in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report and that the project 'otechnical consultant will observe or test the earth Material conditions in the footing excavations. LaIgra The above lateral resistance values are based on footings for an entire structure being placed directly against either compacted fill or competent alluvium. a. 'ldU C °. , For structures t are planned near ascending and descending slopes, footings !:o1: should ! e embedded s..r to satisfy the requirements ..'::is presented frd r. ::o 1808.7 !. illustrated following Foundation Clearances From Slopes diagram. Project Number 15802-IO When determining the required clearance from ascending slopes with a retaining gall at the toe, the height of the slope shall be measured from the top of the wall to the top of the slope. d:i r In accordance with the 2013 CBG and prior to the placement of forms, concrete, or steel, all foundation excavations should be observed by the geologist, engineer, or his representative to verify that they have been excavated into competent bearing materials. The excavations should be per the approved plans, moistened, cleared of all loose materials, trimmed Treat, level, and square. .any moisture softened earth materials should be removed prior to steel or concrete placement. gradeEarth materials from foundation excavations should not be placed in slab on testedmaterials are for expansion potential of dry density. . NUNN ]EARTIHI-STIRLAT , ]INC. 13 May 12, 2015 Project Number 15 0Zw10A r IP: • r w: E ' ' :I d r s : IRA 11111 w.: Exterior continuous footings may be founded at the minimum depths below the lowest adjacent final grade (i.e. 12 inch minimum depth for one-story, 18 inch minimum depth for two-story, and 24 inch minimum depth for three-story construction). Interior continuous footings for one-, two-, and three-story construction may be founded at a minimum depth of 12" inches below the lowest adjacent final grade.. All continuous footings should have a, minimum width of 12, 15, and 18 inches, for one-, two-, and three-story structures respectively per Table 1809.7 of the 2013 CflC, and should be reinforced with a minimum of two ('2) No. 4 bars, one ('1) top and one (1) bottom. Exterior pad footings intended to support roof overhangs, such as second 'story decks, patio covers and similar construction should be a minimum of"24 inches square and founded at a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent final grade° No special reinforcement of the pad footings will be required. Building floor slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches thick and reinforced with a minimum of No. 3' bars spaced a maximum of 24 inches can center, each way. All floor slab reinforcement should be supported on concrete chairs or bricks to ensure the desired placement at mid - depth. Interior loot slabs, within luring or moisture sensitive areas, should be underlain by a minimum 10-aril thick moisture/vapor barrier to help reduce the upward migration o moisture from the underlying earth materials. The moisture/vapor barrierused should meet the performance standards of an ASTM E 1745 Class A material, and be properly installed in accordance with ACl publication 31'E-0e It is the responsibility of the contractor to ensure that the moisture/vapor barriers are free of openings, nips, or punctures prior to placing concrete. As an option for additional moisture reduction, higher strength concrete, such as a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 5,000 pounds per square inch (psi) may be used. ]E RT H[- "7rRAIC , ]INC. 14' May 12, 2015 Ultimately, the design of the moisture/vapor barrier system and recommendations for concrete placement and curing are the purview of the foundation engineer, taking into consideration the project requirements provided by the architect and owner. The subgrade earth materials below all floor slabs should be pre -watered to promote uniform i curing of the concrete and minimize the development of shrinkage cracks, prior to placing concrete. The pre -watering should be verified by Earth -Strata during construction. Corrosion is defined by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NA ) as "a deterioration of a substance or its properties because of a reaction with its environment." From a geotechnical viewpoint, the "substances" are the reinforced concrete foundations or buried metallic elements (not surrounded by concrete) and the "environment" is the prevailing earth materials in contact with them. Many factors can contribute to corrosivity, including the presence of chlorides, sulfates, salts, organic materials, different oxygen levels, poor drainage, different soil types, and moisture content. It is not considered practical or -ealistic to test for all of the factors which may contribute to corrosivity. The potential for concrete exposure to chlorides is based upon the recognized Caltrans reference standard "Bridge Design Specifications", under Subsection 8.22.1 of that document, Caltrans has determined that "Corrosive water or soil contains more than 500 parts per million (ppm) of chloridespp . Based on limited preliminary laboratory testing, the onsite earth materials have chloride contents less than 500 ppm. As such, specific requirements resulting from elevated chloride contents are not required. Specific guidelines for concrete mix design are provided in 2013 CBC Section 1904.1 and ACI 318, Section 4.3 Table 4.3.1 when the soluble sulfate content of earth materials exceeds 0.1 percent by weight. Based on limited preliminary laboratory testing, the onsite earth materials are classified in accordance with Table 4.3.1 as having a negligible sulfate exposure condition. Therefore, structural concrete in contact with onsite earth materials should utilize 'TypeI or IL Based on our laboratory testing of resistivity, the onsite earth materials in contact with buried steel should be considered mildly corrosive. Additionally, pH values below 9.7 are recognized as being corrosive to most common metallic components including, copper, steel., iron, and aluminum. The pH values for the earth materials tested were lower than 9.7. Therefore, any steel or metallic materials that are exposed to the earth materials should be encased in concrete or other measures should be taken to provide corrosion protection. The preliminary test results for corrosivity are based on limited samples, and the initiation of grading nay blend various earth materials together. This blending or imported material could alter and increase ,-ne detrimental properties of the onsite earth materials. Accordingly, additional testing for chlorides and .......... JEARTIHI-STRATA, 11-r,4C. 15 May 12, 2015 Project Number 15802-10A sulfates along with testing for pH and resistivity should be performed upon completion of grading. Laboratory test results are presented in Appendix C. Adiymand&.�Reg EAVIEECS Foundations may be designed in accordance with the recommendations provided in the Tentative Foundation Design Recommendation section of this report. The following table provides the minimum recommended equivalent fluid pressures for design of retaining walls a maximum of 8 feet high. The active earth pressure should be used for design of unrestrained retaining walls, which are free to tilt slightly. The at -rest earth pressure should be used for design of retaining walls that are restrained at the top, such as basement walls., curved walls with no joints, or walls restrained at corners. For curved walls, active pressure may be used if tilting is acceptable and construction joints are provided at each angle point and at a minimum of 15 foot intervals along the curved segments. The retaining wall parameters provided do not account for hydrostatic pressure behind the retaining walls. Therefore, the subdrain systern is a very important part of the design. All retaining walls should be designed to resist surcharge loads imposed by other nearby walls, structures, or vehicles should be added to the above earth pressures, if the additional loads are being applied. within a 1.S:1 (h:v) plane projected up from the heel of the retaining wall footing. As a way of minimizing surcharge loads and the settlement potential of nearby buildings, the footings for the building can be deepened below the 1.5:1 (h:v)plane projected up from the heel ofthe retaining wall footing. Upon request and under a separate scope of work, more detailed analyses can be performed to address equivalent fluid pressures with regard to stepped retaining walls, actual retaining wall heights, actual backfill inclinations, specific backfill materials, higher retaining walls requiring earthquake design motions, etc. .......................................... 0, We recommend a perforated pipe and gravel subdrain system be provided behind all proposed retaining walls to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the proposed retaining walls. The perforated pipe should consist of 4 inch minimum diameter Schedule 40 PVC or ABS SDR-35, placed with the perforations facing down. The pipe should be surrounded by 1 cubic foot per foot of '-/4- or 11/2 inch open graded gravel wrapped in filter fabric. The filter fabric should consist of Mirafi 140N or equivalent to -,revent infiltration of fines and subsequent clogging of the subdrain system. ................ JEAUMFIHI-SIFIRATA, INC, 16 May 12, 2015 Project Number 15802-10A The retaining walls should be adequately coated on the backfilled side of the walls with a proven waterproofing compound by an experienced professional to inhibit infiltration of moisture through the walls. 3:gmporaryfma�xakiahs. All excavations should be made in accordance with Cal' -OS A requirements. Earth -Strata is not responsible for job site safety. Retidnin,g_ !A-ra.11. BatU�flll J: Retaining wall backfill materials should be approved by the geotech-nical engineer or his representative prior to placement as compacted fill. Retaining wall backfill should be placed in lifts no greater than 6 to 8 inches, watered or air dried as necessary to achieve near optimum moisture contents. All retaining wall backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by .STM D 1557, Retaining wall backfill should be capped with a paved surface drain. 1hi-chms-Aulloint SD RLII-19 Concrete sidewalks and patio type slabs should be at least 31/2 inches thick and provided with construction or expansion joints every 6 feet or less, to reduce the potential for excessive cracking. Concrete driveway slabs should be at least 5 inches thick and provided with construction or expansion joints every 10 feet or less. ....................... .... - — -------- z ......... . ........................................ ]EARTIHI-STRATAt ]INC. 17 May 12, 2015 ��O Cracking within concrete flatrork is often a result of factors such as the use of too high a water to cement ratio and/or inadequate steps taken to preventmoisture loss during the curing of the concrete. Concrete istress can be reduced by proper concrete mix design and proper placement and curing of the concrete. Minor cracking within concrete flatwork is normal and should be expected. Laboratory " testing of representative earth materials' indicate an R-value of "53 may be used for preliminary pavement design. The following table includes our minimum recommended asphaltic concrete pavement sections calculated in accordance with the State of California design procedures using assumed Traffic Indices. Final pavement design should be based on sampling and 'testing of post grading' conditions. Alternative pavement sections and calculation sheets have been provided within the appendices of this report. AB - Aggregate 'Base The subgrade earth materials immediately below the aggregate bare (base) should be compacted to a minimum of 95''percent of the maximum dry density determined by ASrI'M D 1557 to a minimum depth of 12 inches. "Base materials should be compacted to a minimum. of 95 percent of the maximum dry density determined by ASTM D 1557. Base materials should consist cal Class 2 aggregate base conforming to Section 26-1.02B of the State of California Standard Specifications or crushed aggregate base conforming to Section 200-2 of the Standard' Specifications for public Works Construction '[Croonbook),. Base materials should be compacted at or slightly below optimum moisture content. Asphaltic concrete materials and construction operations should conform to Section 203 of the Greenbook. ELARREVYIEW ANDCON.,5TRUCTION. SERVI.CES; This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Providence ll Madison Avenue Plaza, LLC and their authorized representative. It likely does not contain sufficient information for other parties or other uses'. Earth -Strata should be engaged to review the final' design plans and specifications prior to construction. This is to verify that the recommendations contained its this report have been properly incorporated into the project plans and specifications. Should Earth -Strata not be 'accorded the opportunity to review the project plans' and specifications, we are not responsibility for i sinterpretat on of our recommendations. ]EARTH -STRATA IINC 1d May 12, 2015 Project lumber 15802-10A We recommend that Earth -Strata be retained to provide geologic and eotechnical m engineering .a+: �: '� �: t �� n � �r: �. f : �' : :� �: '. � '. '�' .:. 7' :... n �� i� �� 'O' .M :R. .. .. �' d � :. Ip� grading changes in the eanticipated to construction. ient that the subsurface nditions differ from those Y 7 � " • M :: � " :� � . s « f � 'i � i � 1 '` .:::� ! f ' .:: is S. ` :! Our services were performed using the 'degree of care and shill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists, practicing at the time and location this report was prepared° No other warranty, , expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice 'included in this report. Earth materials Crary in type, strength, and other geotechnical properties between points of observation and exploration. Groundwater and moisture conditions can also vary due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. As a result, we do not and cannot have complete knowledge of the subsurface conditionsbeneath the subject property. No practical study can completely eliminate uncertainty with regard to the anticipated geotechr ical conditions in connection with a subject property., The conclusions and recommendations within this report are based upon the findings at the points of bserva.tion and are subject to confirmation by Earth -Strata based on the conditions revealed during' grading and construction. This report was prepared with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or their representative, to ensure that the conclusions and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the other~ project consultants and are incorporated into the plans and specifications. The owners' contractor should properly implement the conclusions and recommendations during grading and construction, and ratify the owner if they consider any of the recommendations presented herein to be unsafe or unsuitable. 1EAR1F1H1-ST1 .TX ]INC.19 May 12, 2015 Project Number 15802-10A ff t 117 r i 5 r California Building Standards Commission, 2010,2010 California Building Code, California Code oi Regulations Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2,Based on 20 09 International Building Code. Geo-Slope International, Ltd, 2007, Gca5tudio 2007; Slape1W 2007,' Stability Modeling; ; An Engineering in, Methodology. Hart, Earl d Bryant, Publication 4Z revised 2003. Ali Ishihara, K., 1995, Effects of At -Depth Liquefaction on Embedded Foundations during Earthquakes, Proc. loth Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, August 29- September r Beijing, . r �.:�: ■.' :: g ScaleJenkins, Olaf P., 1978, Geologic Map of Cal��rnia, Santa Ana Sheet� CDMG, Kennedy, M.P., 2000, Nelson, B., and R. Hauser, Geologic Map of the Pechanga 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Riverside and San Diego Counties, California, Version 1.0: U.S. Geological Survey, CDMG. Kennedy, M.P., 1977, Regency and Character of Faulting Along the Elsinore Fault Zone in Southerr Riverside Couqg California, California Division of Mines and Geology Special Report 131. Kennedy, M.P., et all, 2005, Geologic ,flap of the Oceanside 30' x 60' Quadrangle, California, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside Kennedy, M.P., S.S. Tan, 2005, Geologic Map of the San Diego 30' x 60' Quadrangle., Calybrnla, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside. Morton, DHauser, ..: Rachel M., and Ruppert, * 2004, Santa Ana 30'x 60'Quadrangle, Southern Calornia, Version 2.0: U.S. Geological Survey Open -File Report Hauser,Morton, DM., Rachel Ruppert, b a:Preliminary DigitalGeologic Murrieta 7.5 Minute Quadrangle, Southern California, Version 1.0. U.S. Geological Survey Open -File Report l.o99-0172. Morton, D.M. (compiler), and Fred K. Miller (compiler), 2003, Preliminary Geologic Map of the San Bernardino 30' x'6g' "Quadr°anglc, California: U.S'. Geological Survey Open -File report 03-293, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park,' California. Morton, D.M. (compiler), and Fred K. Miller (compiler), 2006, Geologic Map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30'x 60'Quadrangles., California-, U.S. Geological Survey, Version 1, California. National Association of Corrosion Engineers, 1984, Corrosion Basics An Introduction, page 191. Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), 1999, Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 11Z Guidelines Pr Anaty�ing and Mitigating Liquefaction Hazards in California, Match. l f' 14 "lIlivlliell.... ------------------------------- tc nicl Boring, L o a B*1 .Date: May 12,2015 P ro ject Name: SANBORN AVENUE Page: 1 of 1 eject Number: 15802-10A 1ogfed y: AGW B veffling Company: rilling it Type of Rig: CME45B Drive Weight (lbs): 140 �Dr,opiia)-,'30 ...... Hole Diameter (in): 8 op of Hole Elevation (ft)-. Hole Location: See otechnical Map .... CL 0 cu 4-j 0 0 U 0 4-LL CL 44 E 0 E M 2" 0U MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 1 0-51 ................. . . ..... . .. ................... ... jf ........................................................ ..................... ------ ................................... ---------------------------------------------- ...................... . .................... .............. 42 25:k ..... ... . ........................... ----------------------------------- ................................................................................ ..... SC ClaVey SAND; yellowish brown, dry to moist, medium dense, fine to medium sand .............................................. ................... ....... ... .... .................... . ............... .................... ............... 35 112.51 16.5'. ... ......................................................................... ........................ ............................................................................................................... fine to coarse gravel, trace cobbles .......................... ................ ------------------------------------------------------- .................... 5 5 3 V .............. ............................................. ................. ................ ...... .................. ''.111-111 ........ .......................................................... SM Silty SAND; yellowish brown, moist, medium dense, fine to coarse sand, trace clay .............. .6................7........1 13.......... � nAfluv!M 0 Del'12.2.1 ou& aRgsts -------------------------- C 7.5- ................... ................................................................ ................ ......................... ................................................ ............................... Silty SAND; dark moist, medium dense, fine to medium sand, some coarse sand, 21 SM/ML gray, .................... 8.5 1112.8:: 17.0 ...................................... ...................................... .............................................................. ................................................................................................................ .............................. interlayered with Sandy SILT ..................................................................................... .............. ............................ ............... .................... 10 .............. ............. 10, .................... ...................................................................................... ................. ................................... ......................... SM/ML Fine to m ediurn sand .................. 1V 1121.3 13.1 I ................. ...................... ...... ........ ----------------------------------------- - --------------- -------------- — ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End of Boring at 11.5 feet ........................ - ................................... ------------------------------------ . . .......... ............... - -------------------- -------------------- ............. .............. .................................................................................................... No Groundwater ................. ...................... ........ ............................... .................... ........... ................................ ..................................................................... ........................ _ 15 . ................. ............... .................... ............ . . ................. ................ ------------------- ------------------ .................. . ....................................................................................................................... .................. ........... ... ........................ ........... ------------------------ -"- ................ ..... ........ ... ............................ .................. .................................................................................................................................. .......................... ......................................... --- ----------------------------------------- ---- ......... ------------------------------ ......... ......................................................................................................... ........................... ................................... .......... 20 — ........ .... ......... .................... .................................................. .... .......... .............. ...... - .......... --------------- ..................................... . ............... .................. ------------------- ................ .......... .................. ... ............................ ...... ............. .. ..... ............................................................................ ------------------------- .. ..................... .. .. ............................................................................ ...... - ..... .................. ------------------------------------------------- ............. --- -------- ------------------------------------------ ..... ..... .. ..... ...... ---------------------- - ------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .............. ------------------------------------------------ . ................ ------------------------------------------- 25 - — ................... ----------------- - --------------------------------------- .. .:, ........... ....... ------------- ------------------ -----------------.. . . ..... . . . . . ........... ------------------- ...................................................... ........... -------------------------------------------------- ........... -------------........................................................................................................................................... .......................................... ----------------------------------- ---- ............................................................. ----------------------------------- ........ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ................. ....... — ------------ ---------------------- ..... — -------------------- ----------------------------- ....... ....... .............. ................. . .............. -------------------------- - - - - --------------- .......... ....... ------------------------------------------- ............. . ....................................... . ............... — ---------------------------------------- ........................................ ............................. . ................................. ................................................ ........ . ........................... ............ 42217 Rio Nedo Road, Suite A-104, Temecula, CA 92590 - -------------------- ................... --------------- L B-2 Geotechnical Bori!!��B Date: May 12, 2015 Project Name: SANBORN AVENUE Page: 1 of 1 .......... ject Number: 15802-IOA Logged By AG' t'ifil.11ing7 Company: .'Di*llfltng It �Type of Rig: CME45 B ---------------------- ------------------------------- Drive Weight (Ibs): 140 Drop.Qn]: 30 Hole.Diameter (inl: 8 ------------------------ Top of Hole Elevation (ft)-. -------------- Hole Location: See Geotechnical Map - - ------------- ----------- ------- 0 4— 4- 0 '7Ln 0 r 0 M 0 E U LL (U =3 4-J CL E '0 7n Ln M MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0 ............. ............. ...... ------------------------------- F C a fj ............................................. ............... ........................................... ------------------------------------------------------ ............ 36 15' ...................... ...... ........... ................................ -------------------------------- ......... .................. ............... ...... ............. SC Clayey SAND; medium brown moist, medium dense, fine to medium sand, ............. . .... .................. .................... 3.5' 116.21; 13.5 ............. ..... : ................ 11-11-71111 .......... - ........... -------------------------- ................................................................................................................. ............................. I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.�.� ............... -------------------- trace fine to coarse gravel, trace cobble at surface, clay peds up to 2 inches ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ....................................................... ........... .............. 5 ................... ....... 5 . ...... .............. ........ ................ ............... .... ........................................ ..................... .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SC M oist, medium dense, fine to coarse sand ............................................................................................ ........... ............ 6- 122.3: 11.2'," *k T 52 7.5' M L SILT; gray, slightly moist, hard, fine to medium sand ........................... .............. 8.5' 13.0 ............ * ............ ... ................................... ..................................................................................................................... .................... .......................... fluv' If Q ;You ng. A W to 26 10' ................ .......................................................................................... ............................................... $C .. ........... �Clayey SAND; medium brown, moist, medium dense, fine to medium sand, some coarse sand i.. ... ......... -W *xW W 19 -M W I xv V"M in tFOWN! as 4* *"W:$0 WM W W.'=PW:*k 11' 100.81 18.1 IVIL ISandy SILT; medium brown, moist, stiff, fine sand, caliche stringers End of Boring at 11.5 feet ............ ...... ... .. ...... ............ ------------------ ------------------- . .................. ............. .............................................................................................. .......... ...................................... ------------------- No Groundwater ........................... ............................... ...... ........................................... ........................................................... ........................................................................................................... ...................... ............... .............. ............................................................... 15 ..... .................... ................ ............... .................... .................. . ................... ......... ..... ........................ ... ..... ........... -------- ........................................................................ ------------------- I ------------- ... ............................................................................ ........ ---------------------------------------- ........... ........ ................................................ ........................... .......... - ............................................................................................. - ------------------ --- ... ................... ..... ....... 20 - ----------------- ---------------- -------------------- ----------------- ........... .............. ................... ------------------A ...... ........................................................................... ..................................................................................................... ........................... -------------------------------- --- ........... ... ............ ...................................... ............................................................................................................................... ..................... -------------------------------------- ........ ...... ------------------ ----- --------------------------- ... .. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - .............. ---------------------------------------------- .................. .............................................................................................. ........... ................................ ........................................... ...... ------------------------ ...... .............. ......... ....... --- ------------------- ------------------- 2 5 --------------- ---------------- .................. ............. ........................................................ ------ ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------ ----------------- ------------------------- ....... .................................................................................................... ..................................... ........................ .......................... ------------------------ - --- ......... ...... ! . ........ ..... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ — ------------------------------------------ -------------- ---------------------------...................... --------------- 1,11-1111111111 ........ ................ --------------------- . .................. ........ ............. ---------------------------------------- . ....................................... ... -------- . .... . ..... ................................... ............................... .................................. 1: ...................... ---- ---------------- .......... ......... .... ............. ............. ............ ......................................... .................................................. .......... ................ .. d290ieA-104TeeclaCA 942217RioNeoRoadSum y n s IVN F, sk ..... S F % ` :.' r::s:► Laboratory rend Test result Laboratory testing provided quantitative ,and qualitative data involving the relevant engineering properties of the representative earth materials selected for testing. The 'representativesamples were tested in general accordance with American Society'for Testing and Materials (ASTM) procedures and/or California Test Methods (CT M). N..... `ui i x fi . 'Earth materials encountered during exploration were classified and lagged in general accordance with the Standard Practice' for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual' Procedure) of ASTM D 2488. Upon completion of laboratory testing, exploratory logs and sample descriptions were reconciled to reflect laboratory test results with regard to ASTM D 2487.' For select samples moisture content was determined using the guidelines of ASTM D 2216 and dry density determinations were shade using the guidelines of ASTM D 2937. These tests were performed on relatively undisturbed samples and the test results are presented on the exploratory lobs. M; l.,., a The maximum drys' density' and optimum moisture content of representative samples were determined using the guidelines of ASTM D1557. The test results are presented in the table below. E ansion_ Index: The expansion potential of representative samples was evaluated using the guidelines' of ASTM D 4829. The test results are presented in the table below. ------------------- r' i . -Value: The R-value of representative samples was determined using the guidelines of'CTM 301. The test results' are presented in the table below.' : .t...... Rl: f .l r: Minimum resistivity and pH Tests of select sample's NAre're performed using the guidelines of CTM 643. The test results are presented in the table below. Sabublhe guidelines of CTNI .. Sulfate, ...:::::::::::: r..using . a table .�� below. ./. 'y' .r:: presented .:fl: in the : Chloride Content. Chloride content of select samples was determined using the guidelines of CTM 422. The test results are presented in the table below,. !Rv / f ! � f t � 4 ................ .. ... .... �General : t.th.w6r]k..a.nd.-Gritding-- -' M SakdAgatim Intent: These General Earthwork and Grading Specifications are intended to be the minimum requirements for the grading and earthwork shown on the approved grading plan(s) and/or indicated in the geotechnical report(s). These General Earthwork and Grading Specifications should be considered a part of the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report(s) and if they are in conflict with the geotechnical report(s), the specific recommendations in the geotechnical report shall supersede these more general specifications, Observations made during earthwork operations by the project Geotechnical Consultant may result in new or revised recommendations that may supersede these specifications and/or the recommendations in the geotechnical report(s). The Owner shall employ a qualified Geotechnical Consultant of Record (Geotechnical Consultant), prior to commencement of grading or construction. The Geotechnical Consultant shall be responsible for reviewing the approved geotechnical report(s) and accepting the adequacy of the preliminary geotechnical findings, conclusions, and recommendations prior to the commencement of the grading or construction. Prior to commencement of grading or construction, the Owner shall coordinate with the Geotechnical Consultant, and Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) to schedule sufficient personnel for the appropriate level of observation, mapping, and compaction testing. The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the moisture conditioning and processing of the excavations and fill materials. The Geotechnical Consultant should perform periodic relative density testing of fill materials to verify that the attained level of compaction is being accomplished as specified. . ;i.hWor... .. ct r: The Earthwork Contractor (Contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of earth materials to receive compacted fill, moisture - conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill, The Contractor shall be provided with the approved grading plans and geotechnical report(s) for his review and acceptance of responsibilities, prior to commencement of grading.. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the approved grading plans and geotechnicalreport(s)'. Prior to commencement of grading, the Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of "equipment" of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site. The Contractor shall inform the Owner and the 'Geotechnical 'Consultant of work schedule changes and revisions to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate personnel will be available for observation and testing. No assumptions shall be made by the Contractor with regard to whether the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. It is the sole responsibility of the Contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork operations in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading plan(s)e At the sole discretion of the Geotechnical Consultant, any unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable earth materials, improper moisture conditioning, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress keyway size, adverse weather conditions., etc,, resulting in a quality of work less than required in the approved grading plans and geotechnical report(s), the Geotechnical Consultant shall" reject the work and may recommend to the Owner that grading be stopped until conditions are corrected, .Priengtiatl'oh Lf �q.E '1 �. Vegetation, brush,o:: agencies., and other de I 1 11 eter I to I u I s I'll material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed in a method acceptable to the Owner, Geotechnical Consultant, and governing The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals on a site by site basis, Earth materials to be placed as compacted fill shall not contain more than 1 percent organic materials (by volume). No compacted fill lift shall contain more than 10 percent organic matter. Should potentially hazardous materials be , the Contractor shall :�.:�: work �:: .i� affected : � .« w..i area, : �w. s:. �r a hazardous materialssspecialist .yr:..•.: shall continuingimmediately be consulted to evaluate the potentially hazardous materials, prior to It is our understanding that the 'State of California defines most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) as hazardous waste. As'such, indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall be prohibited. The contractor is responsible for all hazardous waste related to his operations. The Geotechnical Consultant doe's not have expertise in this area. If hazardous waste is a concern, then the Owner should contract the services of a qualified environmental assessor. rr C$ ° Q Exposed earth materials that have been observedto be satisfactory for support of compacted fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Exposed earth materials that are not observed to be satisfactory shall be removed or alternative recommendations may be provided by the Geotechnical Consultants Scarification shall' continue until the exposed' earth materials are broken down and free of oversize material and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. The earth materials should be moistened or air' dried to near optimum moisture content, prior to compaction. The Cut Lot Typical retail and Cut/Fill Transition 'Lot Typical 'Detail, included herein provides a graphic illustration that depicts typical overexcavation recommendations made in the approved geotechnical reports and/or grading plan(s)a There fills are to be placed on slopes steeper than 501 '(horizontal to vertical units), the ground shall be thoroughly benched as compacted fill is placed, please see the three Keyway .y, and Benching Typical Details with subtitles Cut Over Fill Slope, Fill Over Cut Slope, and Fill Slope for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or 'smallest keyway shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide (or 1/2 the proposed slope height) and at least 2 feet into competent earth materials as advised by the Geotechnical Consultant. Typical benches shall be excavated' a minimum height of 4 feet' into competent earth materials or as recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on slopes steeper than ;1 should be thoroughly beached or otherwise excavated to provide a flat subgrade for the compacted fill'. f at ice talc All areas to receive compacted fill (bottom excavations), including removal excavations, processed areas, keyways, and benching, shall be observed, mapped, general elevations recorded, and/or tested prig to being' accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant as suitable to receive compacted fill. The Contractor shall obtain a written acceptance from the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placing compacted fill. A licensed surveyor" shall provide the survey control for determining elevations of bottom excavations, processed areas, keyways, and Fill Materials I The Geetechnical Consultant is net responsible for erroneously located, fills, subdryain systems, or excavations. facucrifle Earth material to be used as compacted fill should to a large extent be free of organic matter and other deleterious n:ro:. ` substances .` evaluated and accepted by f :. s : Consultant. ij l- c nt Aiid Coins vd r° ..Lavers: Fill" materials shall be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in nearly horizontal layers net exceeding 8 inches in loose thickness. Thicker layers may be accepted by the Geotechnical Consultant, provided Meld density testing indicates that the grading procedures can adequately compact the thicker layers. Each layer of fill shall be spread evenly and thoroughly nixed to obtain uniformitywithin the earth materials and consistent moisture throughout the fill. Earth materials to be placed as compacted fill shall be watered, dried, blended, and/or mixed, as needed to obtain relatively uniform moisture contents that are at or slightly above optimum. The maximum density and optimum moisture content tests should be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials"(ASTM test method D1557-0€))'. gKIIJUM: Comnac. YUJ: Field tests for moisture content and relative ................ density of the compacted fill earth materials shall be periodically performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. The location and frequency of tests shall be at the Geotechnical Consultant's discretion based on field observations. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be random. The test locations may or ma V y not be selected to verify minimum compaction requirements in areas that are typically prone to inadequate compaction, such as close to slope faces and near benching. I reu�luenc UP I g; Compaction tests shall be taken at v- � -qt Lampa =- a le —AM minimum intervals of every 2 vertical feet and/or per 1,000 cubic yards of compacted materials placed. Additionally, as a guideline, at least one (1) test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or for each 10 vertical feet of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill placement is such that the testing schedule described herein can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant, The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork operations to a safe level so that these minimum standards can be obtained. aMPwkWi0j1--IOAj:I Lpggj.,Op_S: The approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location shall be documented by the Geotechnical Consultant, The Contractor shall coordinate with the Surveyor to assure that sufficient grade stakes are established. This will provide the Geotechnical Consultant with sufficient accuracy to determine the approximate test locations and elevations. The Geotechnical Consultant can not be responsible for staking erroneously located by the Surveyor or Contractor. A minimum of two grade stakes should be provided at a maximum horizontal distance of 100 feet and vertical difference of less than 5 feet. t jig 1Li auall- All excavations and over -excavations for remedial purposes shall be evaluated. by the Geute hnical Consultant during grading operations.. Remedial removal depths indicated can the geotechnical plans are estimates only. The actual removal depths and extent shall be determined by the Geotechnical Consultant based on the field evaluation of exposed conditions during grading operations. Where fill over cut slopes are planned, the cut portion of the slaps shall be excavated, evaluated, and accepted by the Cedtechnical Consultant prior to placement of the fill portion of the proposed slope, unless specifically addressed by the Geotechnical Consultant. 'Typical details for cut over Fill slopes and Fill over cut slopes are provided 'herein. r E , z.3 s• e„� Z r UA LL �3 i� LU ui A� 3--j CL r,n u 4C5 0 W °S ZE v^a'''y� vgYv✓�5r/ V SM N rJ-'a -AM � ff kr. f} Liu rv. A Z ors'i t 'Its f o T.0. iLi �i1+ 7 LLIU r.3... X i�: 8 f11, H tau 4 W f SK ✓Jt } Y N Nw { #•{ S r� y '6, pit i L is sawsomewma t J• iiiiii� :•iiiiiii :::::::::::::::: i •z4: y h^ �p. f' •iiY:%:%:%'"'yt� ���"-qq`. 'ti:. :. ::Yzy tl 'i X's at Sam ME t 5 f, Yam^ 2 WAR t3.�t £a t IWO d [vt [ } S y wx:.:...::... YS HAN No I � MAN.33�5�5i.:........ ,Z • iiiiiiiiiiiiiii: �: W LUD 0 CoL "It :i vE[i co Z oi9* Z kul 55 ,ell Lba LU L Ste,'...:. �sL s a s 3 O s - iA s u ci 3 i di •- - r r' , m & X Z -,r z N � z Q Z> sj #s_r 't y � }� r sY uu $ 5 pr LU y� 4co LLLU LJJ i r 4 S, 4 ` r a a Two. { t{ } 4 LLLU Cs n r n"" �.. f 4 }�yYn�vrrr � Y • i ..J i rye VIP Lij } all CO ri Lli f : - Y t ✓✓,�� .• 4 `i^ • } h diS ..+_r"•-tom' 2 •} :. 2 � C _.. r, r SS is t r _ zti ............................... 47l :...: Y J rf iy, Y 5 ii'.{.;i:iiiii:. •. /i:. .f" env�✓"'r..: ............... ll fi ;�`'w'':::5:5:;:;;� yam. €; { : '•^^^'vf^., ',._""'-'},' 3,.� : r E Es 6 j f sj� Yf •• • asp': •:>::::. { Y }• •.•i 0 f : %»s»» f� :. ......... S y ..%% y � :::::::::::. :::::::....... f{� DD A $ 4 t IC 4: S} r «.3 S. ,:r Y r h5 s s y{r M1/ .y,5 4 r i� s. } SK3 ��// 1 h }. f•Y Y 8�. 3nL? MY f} yam" LU ::.........cyv LL�.-.j to r.L..m. s LU SYJf t7rL y f ZnQ C f f ME j �£ �2 �2 �Q ----------------- ------------- LEGEND Locations are Approximate Geologic Uni ts af' w Artificial Fill Q f Young Alluvial Fan Deposits (Circled where buried) Limits of Report' B-1 Boring Location Including Total Depth and TD, = 115 Depth to Groundwater NO Gy . Recommended Removal Depths ------------------------- GEOTECHNICAL MAP LOCATED AT21427 SANBORN AVENUE CITY OF TEMEC LA, RIVERSIDE COON `Y, CALIFORNIA APN 910-272-011 PROJECT SANO0RN AVENUF CLIENT PROVIDENCE H MADISON AVENUE PLAZA, LLC. PROJECT NO.15802-1OA DATE MAY 2015 SCALE ' 1:4 13WO XREFS REVISION 15094.DW DRAWN BY CS PLATE------------- 1 ffffffffffffffff •:::: �Y:.: .: :: :::: f.. ... :<:ffffffffffffff .... . ... . . . . .... ... . . ... . . . I I I I I I I I .......... I ................................................................................................................................................................................... . ..................................................................................................................................................................................... . ................................................................................................................................................................................... . ..................................................................................................................................................................................... . ,;•: ;.�.•.� ,; ,•::;..:::::::::�.:.:. :..::. .::::::. :! •; :. ::::.....: ,;. ,••.•. ..•:.::'!: .::::•::::.;�. •;::::: ••!fffffffffffffffff;;ffffff::. i= Xay 15 2015 Paul r d Andy , ,d Laubach PROVIDENCECAPITAL GROUP, 183 "F Magdalena, ,1;i9, Suite 100 A 92024 Project No. 1'5802-12A Subject: Interpretive Report for Infiltration System Design, Proposed Commercial Development, Parcel Number Riverside County, California 'he subject property is located at 41427 Sanborn Avenue in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California (see r1gure 1). The subject property consists of an undeveloped parcel of land with relativel� flat terrain. The subject property is underlain by compacted fill and alluvium. E ". A. RUCK N parkingBased on information provided by you, the proposed development will consists of a driveways, lot with interior andon-sretention : R_irSURF A EXEMR-AXION J4 I :' J 4R 0. .6.O TAIGA Y- T-1� , Subsurface exploration of the subject site consisted of 3 exploratory excavations to a depth of 11 1/2 feet, conducted on May 12, 2015. The exploratory holes were excavated to evaluate insitu permeability rates. The approximate location of the exploratory excavations are shown on the attached Infiltration Location Map, Plate 1. A general description of the earth materials observed on site is provided below., ...... . . . . . . r : f ~ jai-v una- pan D(tpcisfts 1 a c 1 Quaternary old fart deposits were encountered to a maximum depth explored. These alluvial deposits consist predominately of gray brown, „fine to coarse grained sand interlayerod with sandy silt. These deposits were generally noted to be in a 'moist, medium dense. GROUNDWATER Groundwater was not observedwithin the exploratory excavations'. INFILTRATION TESTING The continuous presoak test method was utilized to perform a total of four (4) infiltration tests on April 25, 2015 to evaluate rear surface infiltration rates in order to estimate the amount of storm water runoff that can percolate into the onsite bio swale retention basins, The infiltration tests were performed in general accordance with the requirements of insitu infiltration testing. The infiltration tests were performed within 3 inch perforated pipes, 3 to 4 feet deep. The locations of the infiltration test holes are indicated on the attached Infiltration Location Map, Plate 1. The infiltration test holes were located by 'property boundary measurement on the site plan and by using geographic features. For the continuous presoak testing method, the pipe was filled with water and allowed to stand. After the presoak, testing was performed by adjusting the water level to near the top of the pipe. The drop in water level was measured from a fixed initial reference point for more reliable readings, with measurements 'having an accuracy of 1/8-inch, After each measurement, the water level was brought up to the original test level. Infiltration test data recorded in the field is summarized in the following table and is included within' Appendix A. INHILITRAE ON TEST UL : . The infiltration test rates ranged from 48 to 60' minutes per inch (mpi) Based on the data presented in this report and the recommendations' set forth herein, it is the opinion. of Earth - Strata that the retention basin can be designed for a infiltration rate of 60 mpi! Project Number 158 2-12 The following equation was used in order to convert the infiltration rates to infiltration rates. It AH fo r At (r + Havg r`he infiltration rate of 60 rnpi is to be used for the design, This rate is used in the conversion equation utilizing the Porchet Method to obtain the infiltration rate of 0.1 inch/hour. The infiltration rate is below county standards. See' Attached Sheets, This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Providence Capital Group, LLC and their authorized' representative. It likely does not containsufficient information for other parties or other uses. 'Earth -Strata should be engaged to review the final' design plans and specifications prior to construction. This is to verify that the recommendations contained in this report' have been properly incorporated into the project plans and specifications. Should Earth -Strata not be accorded' the opportunity to review the project plans and specifications, we are not responsibility for misinterpretation of our recommendations. Earth -Strata should be retained to provide observations during construction to validate this report. In order to allow for design changes in the event lthat 'the subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to construction.. Earth -Strata should review any changes in the project and modify and approve in writing the conclusions and recommendations of this report. This report' and the drawings contained within are intended for design input purposes only and are not intended to act as construction drawings or specifications. In the event that conditions encountered during grading or construction operations appear to be different than those indicated in this report, cis office should be notified immediately, as revisions may be required. EPTIll Our services were performed using the degree of care and shill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists, practicing at the time and location this report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice' included in this report..' Earth materials vary in type, strength, and other geotechnical properties between points of observation and exploration. Groundwater and moisture conditions can also vary due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent 'properties. As a result, we do not and cannot have complete knowledge of the subsurface conditions beneath the subject ',property. No practical study can 'completely eliminate uncertainty with regard to the anticipated geotechnical conditions in connection with a subject property. The conclusions and recommendations within this report are based upon the findings at the points of observation and are subject to confirmation by Earth -Strata during construction. This report is considered valid for a period of one year from the time the report was issued. 1E 1k ,1F1H1-S" `1 . .]F 11inic9 3' May 15, 2015 This report was prepared with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or their representative, to ensure that the conclusions and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the other project consultants and are incorporated into the plans and specifications. The owners' contractor should properly implement the conclusions and recommendations during grading and construction, and notify the owner if they consider any of the recommendations presented herein to be unsafe or unsuitable. J Respectfully submitted, EARTIH-STRATA, INC. OEM Distribution: (4) Addressee Attachments: Figure I - Vicinity Map (Rear of Text) Appendix A - Infiltration" lest Sheets (Rear of Text) Plate 1 - Infiltration Location Map (Rear of Text) EARTH -STRATA, fnc. 4 May 15., 2015 Project Number 15802-12A VICINITY MAP �� / l ! �/� X Ln V l c CD a- UJ E CL w ea _I .€. t2 . e^v �+ 0 rm CL U 0 n F a � ...::;: vc° f t w9 t�6 a° 15 Lr9 a tt CD C3 C7 [ i C? C3 B C7 tu �.X X 6 r4 s� Nuo tY x�E C3 �E C4 (V 00 > .0 Q E d:I M, i3$ ED Z 0J: Au: w w m = = yJ Z 3} i} AA t C 0 0: : Ln rr7 eY1 rrt M eva � f'r'9 a^!7 cry r� �a Itm �r as 4.1 41 0 c ManagementWater Quality Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 o;; Appendix 4,,- Historical Site Conditions Phase I Environmental Site Assessment or Other Information o Post A a. a. f amA s7la.xV m✓ar+;,s.4aa.:p.... " r e -A,- & &%Avfj%J.L L. County of Riverside 6tormwater Program Santa Ana River Watershed Geodatabase Thursday, October 26, 2017 Note: The information provided in this report and on the Stormwater Geodatabase for the County of Riverside 5tormwater Program is intended to provide bash guidance in the preparation of the applicant's Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) and should not be relied upon without independent verification. Project Site Parcel IVumber(s)a 910272011,910272030 Latitude/Longitude, 33.5256,-117.1675 Thomas Brothers page: 950 Project Site Acreage. 1.21 Watershed(s): SA TA MARGARITA This Project Site Resides in the following Hydrologic Breit HUC Name - HUC Number (s) (HUC): Santa Gertu is Creek e 180703020406 The HUCs Contribute stprmwater to the following 303d WBID Name - WBIL Number listed water bodies and T'MDLs which may include Santa. Margarita River (Lower) - CAR902110001998091116i 346 drainage from your proposed Project Site Santa Margarita River (Upper) - CAR90222000200110 1141050 Murrieta Creek - CAR9023200020010924152136 Santa'Gertrudis Creek - CAR90242000200808 5001546' These 303d listed Water bodies and'TMDL.s have the Bacterial Indicators - Enterccoccus, Escherichia soli ( . call), Fecal C olifforstl following Pollutants of Concern (POC): "Metals/Metalloids - Copper, Iran, Manganese Nutrients - Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Total Nitrogen as N Pesticides - Chlorpyriffos Toxicity - Toxicity " Limitations on Infiltration: Project Site iOnsite Sails Group(s) - A, C Known Groundwater Contamination Plumes within 1000' - No Adjacent Water Supply Wells(s) - No information available please contact your local water agency for more information. Your local contact agency is EASTERN MUNICIPAL' W.D., RANCHO CALIFORNIA W.D.. Your local wholesaler contact agency is METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT:.. Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 200'(Fieh and None Wildlife Habitat/Species): Environmentally Sensitive Areas within 200'(CVMSHCP): None Environmentally Sensitive Areas withers 200'(WRMSHCP), None Groundwater elevation from Mears Sea Level. No Data 85th Percentile Design Storm Depth (ire): 0,692 Groundwater Basin TEMECULA VALLEY MSHCP/CVMSHCP Criteria Cell(s)e No Data Retention Ordinance Information No Data Studies and Reports Related to Project Site: 1131 SrFores - Sout€ e rr Cal bulle,tinl 15_ 4 c '' ��tatsr;aact s- a .1'1 Murrieta Creek Beata Margarita River Watershed Annual + a' terrnaster Murrieta Creek,! urraata Valie•-y ADP Map 1 Murrieta CreeWl`yIurneta Valley ADP Map 2 Murrieta Cre k/rvlurrtta Valley ADP Report. SMR Annual Repay" 2009.-10 Y :-.; , S :_� `: ¢. 4`�: <"i : S" r "4 •;.: 0 8"'1 'A 1 /" : A: T % T- A 0 ::T'%N TT T Ik X A I A, j04�. -1 A I : I QualityWater Management Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 1 of ParcelMap ...: i :. 5 6 i. 1. Appendix 6. BMP Design uetails, BMP Sizing, Design Details and other Supporting Documentation Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Parking Lot 11 Lot 11 of PM 23561-1, PA Santa Maj:garita Watershed.Required Entries Lndo B P Design Volume, VBk� (Rev. 03-2012) Calculated ells i Enter the y° Percentile, 24Whour'Rainfall Depth D85 ` �e 9 ........ ..... ........................... ....... Determine the Effective ItnP rvio s Fraction Type of post -development surface cover Concrete or ph i (use pull down menus Effective Impervious Fraction ------------------ Required Entries Calculated Cells Type of post -development surface cover' Pervious: � �t t` r�� A p eIt (use pull dawnmenu)' Effective Impervious Fraction lip ....... ......... ......... ......... ......... ........11tao� Area � 3j= (gin® 1�) € ' �:) , ' f l c� t� »`` f a A 12 dote. Required Entries Calculated Celts Type of'post-development surface cover (use pull down menu) Effective Impervious Fraction dtese Santa Margatita Watershed Designed by Hobert aunty/City Case o Company Project ur beri ameSanborn A e u Parkin ,�t Drainage area i�lurrrberflameiA4 m I'P4 Required Entries Calculated ells Enter the Area Tributary to this Feature AT = 0.022 acres l to 85 Percentile,,.',24-hour Rainfall Dc i, from, the I� h�°�:faI ���� in Handb�a�k �� �f�di E - ------------------------ - - Site Location Township: TV H Enter the 85c4 Percentile, 24-hour Rainfall Depth Determine the Eff Type of post -development surface cover (use pull down menu)' -Effective: Impervious Fraction 0 Section 27 .... ........ D95 46 9 tive'Iri l�erViou's Fraction Fervious Concr.ett I Fibrous . i scpl�alt if � l� .. ..... .......... .... Calculate VU, the 85% Unit Storage Volume V = Ds5 x C ' V = in''` c ao _ _...... ......_ _.... ........ _...._ ..._... .._..__....... Calculate the -co ipoMt.° Runoff ryoeffi k-Int. C for the BMP rr� Ut..,�iry, area Santa Margarita WatershedRequired Entries Legend: BMP Design Volume, VB (Rear. Q3-2012) Calculated Cells '� 4y4y pp SS � Company NameVentura En �n��r�n �ntan ��� 6/ 12fl1 :Designed by Rob it _ _ ounty/City Case No See Cover, sheet Company Project NumberName born.Am nu Firkin dot Drainage Area NumberNa DMA61-T6.11 Enter the .area Tributary t® this Feature AT = Q.17 cres' ........: .--..:. ... .....: ........................... :... ......................... 85t ere.ein le, 2 hour Fainfall � t11 from the Is h-v��t 1 � ' to Handbook � l�aendix -------------------------------p.:..-- ... ....................1.----......� .. Site Location Township Range Section F� Enter the 5' Percentiles 24®hour Rainfall Depth D8s ® �e � „ ........ ........ Dete i the the Effective It e -vwu.SFraction Type of'post-development surface cover n teor � p Alt (use pull down menu Effective Impervious Fraction bQ i��c_ul�i� the Osite Rur�®ff��i€x��t,.'C fc�r the �l�tit.r re, Notes: .................. ....... ......... .. ....... ..... ...... ....... .. Santa �°� Required Entries Legend; Levi ° Design plume, V13(Rev. Q3-20 2� Calculated ells :...,.: .. .. ...:.. .. .. ... ... ..... ,e .� � 3.3 :��E � j,#L; yfi �:� 33#'t FJ.t 3tt Water Quality Management Plan Sanborn Avenue Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA17-1642, LD18-0519, LD18-1180, LD18-1182 .. .......... Enter the area tributaryto this feature AT= acres Enter VBmp determines from Section 2.1 of this Handbook VBMp— ........................:...... 29 ft ........... ......... ........ .... ......... ......... ......... .......------------------------------ ...... ..:. ...... ........ ......... Permeable Pavement Surface Area ......... Reservoir Layer Depth, bTu bTn® 2 inches Minimum Surface Area Required, As €.: O' 1 l ft '1 As 1t ' s tt_G 1�,�i. �. l ru (i .1 i-�.in/01.l Proposed Surface rare 1 ` ------.-------- ......... ......... ......... ......... ...... ............ . .....----.... ......... ......... Permeable Pavement Cross Section ......... Per the Geotechnical (A) in 3 : Engineer's (B) � iynp � '�. a rt-�.:3 �Y k���f. ..t t}C fm�"':"" y :y �,.;;:Y.•..:-�. .-�..K.-�.t.-�,..-...;ro. .. 31 . . Recommendations i n 5 tN •..x (C) aC- o D;!,. G LA •t'Vf Reservoir Layer (D)' 2 in " T# i} Total Permeable pavement Section ......: ....:: in Wj"! lpcf Prrneablc Pacrnnt 2 ........ ............:. Sediment Control Provided"? (Use ulldo rn)' c� Geotechnical report 'attached? ''(Use pulldown) Riverside County Best Management Practice Design Handbook JUNE 2010 17illb lAi E�LA149wbE EfAgEf�y3 Permeable Pavement Desicrn Procedure legend g� DMA2 " f �°'��t Company Name— Ventura En j'EEE!'E i r�[anc Crate, 1 n l l .-Robert b rt znt �rrt t Case No.: .. :::. ........... .. ......... .......�.: � ,, �..:. �....... S�� C®vei Volume Enter the area tributary to this feature AT = �<1 17 acres x Enter' Vamp determines from Section 2.1 of this Handbook' VBMP 2 5 ft3' ......... .......................... Permeable Pavement Surface Area ................. ,.... ......:: ......... ......... Reservoir Layer Depth, bTH bTH= 12 inches Minimum Surface Area Required, As A in � s s (ft _ N tll; r �. .lni 1.in'tt:. Propasd Surfae ire 9�2::, .... ft2 .. ....... ........ ......... ......... .... .... Permeable' Pavement Crass Section' _ .�..... ......... ......... ......... ........: ........------..! .. .... .... : ..... £ Per the eoteehnieal (A) in Engineer's (B) in �....., - Recommendations { � .. .......................... «.....k. N 4 i uw ReservoirL,a er I�MIMI. in €'D RESFt V0C R -A'ES. B--�, €' Total Permeable Pavement Section ......... ......... in :'%}f; ���: rfy f'y-'•' f��i, %%v/�,��%%IH;/� � ..,. •::.� ,__... �f 'f :.... :::..: Slope of Pavement p 2 v Sediment Control Provided? (Use pulldown)„ des Geoteehnical report attached? (Use 'pulido n) des �Describe Surrounding Vegetation: Ground,e€er lads;;a�in Riverside County Best 17"lanagernent Practice Design Miandbook, JUNE 0 afif *,FDA#CMG LAYER--- -------- ---...... ......... ....--... .... ... Permeable Pavement Cross Section' ;f _..... 1'r.the tlnil;) in n s ;�n� (°) in sYdifi -}> . Reser it Layer In Total Permeable Pavement See ton '.......:.. ......... ire `s. . } ... Riverside County Best Management Practice Design Handbook JUNE 2010 Permeable Procedure .. r. --------------------------------------------------------------- �Sw<vs,��9 d#E�f �T'�€ Total Permeable Pavement Section ::::::::.::�::..: in WZ11' 'd1f?h£i s<53 �; slip �f� rrrt�t'1 Pt���rt' Ida Sediment Control provided? (Use pulldown)' x Geotechnical report attached` (Use pulldown)'' Describe Surrounding Vegetation': GroundCover la.ndsc apin.... g--------------------------------------------------- �kiverside County Best Management Practice Design Handbook ermea e ravement Oesignr MA5 - PP5 -------- Company rn Ventura, tr n meerin in artc Date: 7-Robert....vnty/ Case o.0 �__... Design Y®' we x .. .......:: .......:: ......... .............. .. ............................ Permeable ble Pavement Cross Section. # $ :Per the Geotechnical ( in . 3# Engineer`s () In :Recommendations ( In €,I-T : ice DONGt.AYi ...: Resemroir Layer (D) in 'D) Q.'FSF.R', 0i,-,,,;2;y�5`�L�8,:, 12 9�� Total Permeable Pavement Section :...; in f % •. ?'�% Slope �t Permeable Pavement I% .tff f+.?%f ...... f!??{{•��Jff.�r��. ..... !.. Sediment Control Provided? (Use pulldown)' �s Geotechn cal reportattached? (Use pulld€ wn)'' L�scribur��ndin�atint�tr��r lndspr ... ... ... ... ...... . Notes:< Riverside County Best Management Practice Design Handbook JUNE 2010 Enter' f3mp determines from Section �`?.1 of this Handbook ....................................... Permeable Pavement Surface Area Legend-. Date: .................................................... a` 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- T= e 111, 1 acres VP— I 1 ft3 Per the Geotechnlca1 (A) in Engine r°s ( )', _ 2 ln tA, PA,VE ME N . :: :^�y,f Recommendations in 9EMNG LAYER. { Reservoir Layer D) 1 In NxiversideCountyBestManagementPractice Handbook JUNE 2010 lity Water,reManagement Sanborn AvenueParkingo Lot 11 of Parcel Map 6 .... NOW IN 3.3 Permeable Pavement Sitting -COnsiderations. ' r44ti 8 884488h h LL4(i " The WQMPapplicable to the project location should be consulted, as it may include criteria for determining the applicability of this and ether Infiltration -based 'BMPs to the project. r � w I �' �:: I e- : * . '�: :..:.A. :. a ".. � ; � 'v • ® �' -� � ". ' � ' a. ®: : r lip: a 0' Downstream of erodible areas (D Downstream of areas with a"high "likelihood of pollutant spills G Industrial ' or high vehicular traffic areas (25,000 or greater average daily traffic) 0 Areas where ge®technical concerns, such as soils with low infiltration rates, would preclude the use of this BIVIPe Lo;s Pructfco IAcwgn Handhoo z•cv, 9/201Z Page '.I. Section A -A Also, while a seal coat treatment may be used on the impermeable fire land, traditional seal coat treatments shall not be used on permeable pavement. Page PERJ'WEABLE PAVEMENT BMP FA T HEET' Setbacksqq yYy specific recommendations Always nsult your technical engineer for site setbacks for permeable pavement. Recommended setbacks are needed to protect buildings, walls, onsite wells, streams and tanks. Figure 2: Permeable Pavement Setback Requirements 'Design and Slionatriterla To ensure that the pavement Mcompromised,# .: drawdown time is utilized for this BMP instead of the longer drawdown time used for most volume based BMPs. ....... .....,.. ................ Low Impact Development Best Management Practice Design Handbook rev. 912011 Page 3 PERMEABLE PAVEMENT BMP FACT SHEET w' .. � �: ®i::. i #: a � is � • � #6.: ! '� i a:.. y, r. O R Figure 3 e Sloped Cross Sections for Permeable Pavement ............... ............................ Low Impact Developinew Best M anageonerrt Practice Design Handbook rev. 912011 Page_4 PERMEABLE PAVEMENT BMP FACT SHEET NON -POROUS CHECK DAMS Figure y: Permeable Pavement Non -Permeable Check Dams To assure that the subgrade will empty within the 24 hour drawdown time, it is important that the maximum depth of 12 inches for the reservoir layer discussed in the design procedure is not exceeded. The value should be measured from the lowest elevation of the slope (Figure 4). " :�:: is } ,�: a '. • • • • r + ..:.r • . i• � * �. as *.: .s. • � � i a • • "® train with permeable pavements. ........ ......... ......... ....... ... Low Impact Development Best Management Practice Design Handbook rev. 912011 Page 5' PERMEABLE PAVEMENT..,,,B.. P F.f`A.C`5G; SHEE s overflow y overflow needed largerAn in the permeable pavement design to bypass storm flows acceptable discharge point downstream conveyance 13 PROPOSED BULL ING Figure 6: Incorrect Roof Drainage POROUS PAVFtANT Correct Figure 7: Roof Runoff ......... ......... ........ ......... ......... ..,...................................... ........ ......... Low Impact Development Bert Management Practice Design Handbook rev. 912011 Page 6' Water Quality Management a Lot 11 Parking Lot y TableThis appendix is empty because A.2 illustrates the project is exempt from HMP. Water Quality Management Plan Lot 11 Parking Lot Lot 11 of Parcel Map 23561-1, PA_ Appendix 8: Source Control 97 E (,J CL Ld- > an ' CL M flY9 : CL �: c� 5. e c � `� •dam � � � � � � EE CL ® r� C •� 0 m C3 v� Ci �d _ m m m 0ei e� SKS sm a-4 ate+ °^ w C m m di^� q,� P49 CL ay g1 �: C ems. m Q�. {/$ cu CL Q 7JZ 5J: CL U li7 C^. � : � � {� : LAut ; � �.. C "' so S 3 s ' ® ® ILJ El a 6. z: ru of 4acm 41 y{.J... o ': CdI LZ m: CL E ., r' y�- C cu ;F, 1, A - f f r' Y 9!: CL 0 E m no W 41 ci 61, Vi L �a• y.s V Wi ri tw :CL ...: Y� :E CL V oj c Lii 6Jj : YW ------------ lk- arM C7 � VI cn 3 aw, E 4a CL I bD ai e ergCL M CL r- -u a W m � m co w o ' s r',IA ', C CL �- Ln � of 4 m V) 0 La LULCJ 4ALU s ®_ ° c v a�V,-- < 4. 0 � as :3 � ,41 � ro cu m -- CL 0 1 , 3t "M 1 CL 0 r 1 U ^ U M " — s� Mgr � r W � � � � � � �, � � +a �, � n � Eto � cu 0 ai w u c , * spa ea. 4— C `° C C, ba C: f . ................ ......... ......... ... --_ LU C 0 4A m re w in j LE u.. s M ru C : a W svy 0 �F �1 i�41 u u �v E' +— m 0 Ln C hn +� 4EJ 06 9�1 CD a _ 4� 0 CU 16. 9 a Lq SA! U► ulLAJ U LU 0 uj 0 uj LU t5,r. NJ .a u ' ,M M 41 LL CU 0 E� uCL 0 M' w7 �e�yy a .m 0i % P V�e'Y 0 LU lu ... ... g LAJ ®41 �° CL C1 .:L ppvv �y Bm aj ee}d LJ u +�� cr t Cr Qj :iv 4 cu : ru lw •m : Q 1 11 (JF LA:. 0..4-1 .r.. $SS �y� ......: �eM 0 c} E ^�. w < > - 4i m u E 0 c m m aj � 41 a ro �a o u m CL m +� �' 'cs cu c ` m c m .c v ns 0 w 0 Li Fie .. ....... _ ......... its cu m m 0 41 'M r- t�9 41 � .� 4.1 w 1 M 41 u LU SEA ukno a a Q v to cn ro L7 C7 +a - a 47 C 3 cr El ------------ �w m abee IIT 0 L- W cu CLe � R� CL 0LLI �n W u C. m' Lj" v* Ln 0 LPg z 0 i tie � LLA LAJ �g 0. � pg,g s e 0 W I . 0 C "� Q$ m Q! CL m rif vs ! i L a cu _ �? - ai c Ln eay ,-4-1 a 0 Oro W m o C CL W 0 is _ s�i 4� �n � '�n �g �aa acs sc + W fU �p �% M r4 4. a� m # �M 0 0 °a 0 Z .� CL u 0 E S A E sn to C1 uj uj 41 > .7 es a; w CL a CL 0 z O 4 C1 a� L° Ll M ui CL CL w pq IA 0 a w w E r4.1 V� CL Ln -M c 0 � -fir LU ......... ......... ........ :::: ................................................. w .1 a� M '5 CL m Lna M > ro E M 0 W 0 a� 4� w Lo a6 "C3 E ^ra � tE9 a ov y to v 6- w dw u� �3 ul av E � sfl1 C dQs av t i •� M Yea E c 3� 0 C 0 p E 4. CP 0 4 lam.. n ' G7. pu v c.. Q =" 0 W : `'r"' 0 : tiF ,yer :.0 C Q � G1 < Q �1! J- CL '. 'Ln u LU U ui o e c+ CL 0 �► "' o 0 nJ UJ LU 0 El El Cis :. _ .: p1�p1yypp :� CL V'4 m etp" co g�yypq W. LL tyt]. .n C_ 6dF 0 :4�rE 0 LU uj S� "m dui a 9 43 > E : ai u �J `CJ t�9 ti7 O1 U3 't91 9"" . 06 101 0 fSY 0 I 4cu 5, w RF9 f� C i Lol tA in (9 0 LA 41 .0 6. m, cu E 42 E •� <. v 0 w lu q� -0 ou M w -as " s cu ra ° 0 V C w G� 1 .® ( �a " .F -a a E 0 E LU 0 CL °' °' c >- W sa au �a iE3 ° kSP 41 0 � � 0 41 ' E � - N 0-20Em �, ;a .. cn .m V) -0 rd1 sh afl u: CL El W m 41 IA w o :a ' Ecr L 0 LU s� w 5 � w E ® Er � Z C! j^ Y : fie+ uouj 0 �I re Qj 41 CL CL Cr � m a C ai tw .r ' ajca w C l� jai $� t �' �% •,' :aj tw E� �f. py.+ L CL ryQ�i CL :¢py� CT 1:1 El �v e aL�tlL�pfl Yd 6 LU ».......r�....r tQce tw •uo ". ppq��ppyy .. L • •. q�� .> 66 �gg 0 gI—p� Ln � 4) 0 � U I�w Rae ypp m �. E m _ �ee W: w m- bn 0 �m u w :. �.. uj tw ;Ian• 41 ag a „ iA c� , cs a 4-1 i4— n CL �s 'Ln 4 pj •.�� : ra z "� v �+ sa u, twsm w � Ln � �` + m.n U U ra a w g �, as m > w � E u 0 m " +�� N tao `^ •`" p — `� s a c LC CA mo $g iL t1g f58 G t59 u1 ^ s 0E� '� E av 'en �?^ ro v aw rya w MD�' wsrs .0 .0 " n m m Q CL mwr _ sa p w ug III' 0 a: � � E CA 0. LU Cr w Li � Qcu wi LU 0' ai 4 ...... ......... �. 41 Ca4- a `a E o " W — m 0 a) _ w CL > r� 41 M ' - > 'M a . —s — M (u � 4u tre 9J "� vs tw M 0 W 0 1 n z o w m ca Uj Li w 0 M -0 r a w 4 r 0 � 0 u 16. cr r u°da Q eo .� .® ' c' 01 4-0 r m E E '+ 41 w +° a r c cr ®' El s... m Q.E �43 41 � C1 � a-+ � ®J o CL s�v pia rs' 4-1 ggg I u �1 pi C7J its e 2— C m LA C aw CL iTi. C7 e. E � Ln P i `�" 'i� m3� '6:e iU. edY �1p$ em yam.• '`�": •CU „Q '' El 1 uj Li (A 4,1 CL w CL CL cu (U Ln cu m E cj Qj CL 4- tm 0 0 W M cf 4-P 0 z vi w Z5 0 cc Q) u uj CL CL J= Oi di d) 0 El El to LU yoo L4 m m LU ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- a, m ou mw E aj E = CL E :3 0 E 4c' WEuWEO w cc cv E cu LU > E m 0 OL w 4t C m m W c 0 x —0 is m a = m +1 E -0 $A 5 W > M — z 0 CU M -0 z uj 5. 4 E m w -0 0 CL CL 0 E m CL bb W W W E W CA 4a 4� M a Lee tid m W Ln Lei to M CL cu w a m t 0 c 67 spp 2 a m E m �Li L.L w LM M tn CL U- U El Li -- ---------------------- LU — M uj 4a c Qj 0 z vi Ln 0 uj LU LL ................................ CE 'a cr u°D < 0 ® cr k� R.1 t C c tE9 C3 z m N q} W 'D .W' cuCL U uj a cr rm c 0 uj Li B uj uCL 4 c 0 41 El uj se 0 4 cu cu c `a ma° ci co `�°, CL 41 ro "" Er c a �8B w m 2 CL -0 Ca o +� �a �' o � as u > m m � 'ss c v (j r m ads us �90 F q ep ® C3 u W 0 p M4- 4� i7 0 w ct 6E! C GE yy '2 Bif! v � � 0q0 a m crt � v � � � �., tv att srs O a `C3 ...a � 4 ads i �18 CL �a of Q LU S0000 � P PW tw p 0 z SA ® LAJ uj 0 w < CL Ln E w tw CL m 4,9 tom' E 911 0 m END C' da sU awn `M i C cL �s [�CUE m �^ o m w GJ a %1 P Gj ^tg CA ® M M tn LLA uj 0 0 LU a M re+ a m tU a- (9 B49 Ln U 0M w aj w css41 CE 0 m V I M Ci 0 " m a a 1 " U �t vt C3 > 0 E 0 m m 6 Q 43 w m j� tM 0 � �a "0 �i � U � � � � �n � CL M Ate+ E J w a CLu +4 t49 C3 u �B3 .. ®' 0 � � Sti M j 0 LU tA ------------------------ _. cu PIB CL SO m °" c C8� ro' CL L ` z C3 C0 N CL t m a: r0 ( tea Ca, 6 Li El 11 a ? SanbornWater Quality Management Plan .. e ,. Parking o .. Lot 11 of Parcel 66. " : D ? .i: # rs: i . D8s: IM (Property I Owner's Name) (Property Mailing Address) ENCINI'T S g CALIFORNIA 92024 20.18"wO2:87634 i � 4 F RECORDING OF A :WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN OPERATION. AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT SANBORN AVENUE PARKING LOT ------------ 9: of Project) NWC M (Address or Tract MaAlLot No.) PARCEL 11 OF PM 23561-1 P/M 157/44 Project's Assessor Parcel Number: 910 - 72 - 011 This Operation and Maintenance Agreement (Agreement) is made in The City o Temecula (city), amunicipal located in. h o,n 6 i ersid � tal f l€ or iaB y (insert � "1 TEA} ULA '�� �.�:����� ' AVENUE, ► ��c �» (Owner), this (insert day) o (insert month and year). ........ ... JIM ,r IN WITNESSTHEREOF, the Owner hereto affixes their signature as of the date first 6tten above. fy WARD .. . Commission # 21406A Notary Public - California Sari DiegoCounty �. V COMMAa ,tan 26, 202 of the State of California that the foregi - is true rid correct. � « w� ,� WITNESS my i�:�;��xbnd: official seal,: Signature ......:: � .... ......... ....... ......... Signature of A0 tarp Public 3 Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this fora to an unintended doc r>rnenlft" Description of Attached : wnen* � #' Title or f ¢ k� ,.0cuhimit ®ate Number of Pages:,� ' : ....: igra�r��) �th�r €Aiy r : Named Above: Capacity(lies) Claimed bySigner(s)'' Signer's Marne:....:. Signer's Name ­.. Corporate Officer — Tit'le(a).,, ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s) L3 Partner' — ❑ Limited ❑ General 0 Partner -- U Limited i.1 General ❑ Individual' ❑ Attorney in Fact C1 Individual ' El Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator' ❑ Trustee" 0 Guardian or Conservator F Other..::.... � L i Other: Signer Is Representing.,, _ Signer Is Representing, � <t � a •�.�r r!a w f � �•ru r fr f:s r r�: ;� > �.r .a �'yfr r r, r ��: a ,�. o-�� fr �u •�' z o,y � Y '.4 f.•., <:/v::.:..,.:.:•.fcr :::.:.....::.'r,,',.,:.:::f:.: /.,:.:.:: �..•,::;?..:.::: ,.:::.:..:.•::. ••:? ::::.. �F:. ../.,.� ::.a �:� •::.d,�:.:/ .. ••>..•Y� :�:::• :::.b'rr•.E;� �.: �;. ,r::a;.�'.v�: � .r ..:;5, .::%i. �;,.:. x:....,.:.o ?.:...:,..•:..:.a, �::,. ,::.a •. .. 9;:.Y,.. X:,:',�....'... q... .r v :. ... l... t'd .:.... / ..ti:.....v J•...'?J :.m ..../.. J.... n: ... rr .. v+....n ... / .. v ... F... <.....y .. n .... /.F.....y:.....�.....v ... J....... /..... /..,. a:.. v/.:.. 02014 National Notary Association - www. National N otary,org-'1-800-US NOTARY (1- 00-8 6-682 `) Item # 907 SY} t 44, PARCEL 11 OF PARCEL MAP 23561-1 FILED IN BOOK 157, PAGES 44 RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE EXHIBIT BMP LOCATION PECHANGA SQUARE N C SANSCRN AVE AND MADI ON AVE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590' PN° 910-272-011 � NU r MADISON AVENUE � 2 $w s .s'.: :�i.i...., �� .. s y:. .,s .,.st.:: ;t. :... -• siiafi6�.;h# :,. :. ',. i, f r '.4i...:. �.nr „ ., ,, .,r-;c�f,,.,.,. a4. ;: ��;. BMP TABLE' . ID TYPE LAT. N) LONG. ( ) PP2 PERMEABLE PAVERS 33.52589 117,1 762' ' PP2 PERMEABLE PAVERS 33.52579 117.16783' PP3 PERMEABLE PAVERS 33,52 81 117.16755 PP4 PERMEABLE PAVERS 33.52571 117.16777' PP5 PERMEABLE. PAVERS 33.52552' 117.16748 PPS PERMEABLE LE PAVERS 33.52548 117.16744 �I ------------- EXHIBIT 8 OMP DETAILS . . ........ ... ......... .......... 0 1-1-le" C 0 A Q U A B R 1 (--l' P E R NA EA B I .... E. INTFRLOCKING PAVERS S -WAY 0 A D; N s TANDARD COMMERCIAL PARKING :.--T/DRiVE -R N 10 N 'IC INS]"Al ... I.-AUI TION FOR REQRED WATER D'E"TE AQUA-B. ........ ..... .......... . .... �w� . . .... AND VQ;D R:IEF, 2' TO 4' MN EiMF COUP,5F Vi�- ",�;A i H D OFIE14-GRA Ul-Fj STONE UONNC (--UJU . ............. ............... j;:--! 77- rM l[K .......... .......... ! 7�, W;Tl� No, a MX'111� 90% COMPACTED Mg, .STANDARILD N' S T A L L AT: 0 N WITH CONCRETE C'U R B EDGE RE ................. D RkV0,5 Vo-,M, ,Vg',MOV� TOP ANO 6tJK)170," HO L�� M'vlM M DPA. A k� z TYP;:;','AL INI-�'TALLA�1,C)N "MTH Ty ICAL INSTALLMirDN '�NM-; p 0 N C R E"' E G R A HE BE A, �l CONCRETE DRAMAGE V{; EACH HPMEAKE Dl',-`S;N es,.NO NSTAT IAIMN MUST flr APPROVED ay THE SEE COMPLE7 ON �),ACK OF rROW"OVER ................. IORCC PAVING� E S - 5 R U TI �"E S E 92509 MAV: COMM, DR;vc:,wAy .. . ............. ........ . ..... - ..... .. ............. ---------------- - — — ------ Emm rs: PARTYFISCALLY RESPONSIBLE Providence q ,MadisonAvenue Encinitas, California 92024 RECORD KEEPING Records shall be kept on site for tat least five (5) years or as directed by s: ; ity or Regional Board and must be made available for inspection upon request. Exhibit e Rage 1 of 4 11111 ii ;. >:11, TYPICAL MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES The following is a compilation of Routine Actions required for each installed BMP on the project site. Approximate Gusts: Varies per maintenance required' Routine Action. Prevent Soff From Washing Onto Pavers'' Maintenance Indicator: debris, trash, or litter present' FuldMeasurements: Visual Inspection Inspection Frequency, During routine trashing Maintenance Activity:, Remove debris, trash, and litter Approximate Costs: None anticipated Maintenance Indicator, Routine Maintenance Inspection Frequency,. 1.. End of winter (April) 2. Mid -Summer (July/August) 3, After Autumn Leaf -Fall (November) Maintenance Activity, Use a commercial Sweeping Machine to vacuum the pavement area to clear void openings and remove fine grits, debris, and possible materials that could inhibit the efficiency of the pervious pavement section. ApproximateCosts, Approximately $250/acre per maintenance Routine Action: Inspect Outlet' Maintenance Indicator: Clogged cutlets Field Measurements: : Visual Inspection Inspection Frequency:' 1, after Autumn Leaf -Fall (November) 2. End of Winter (April) Maintenance Activity: Unclog outlet ApproximateCosts: ' Varies per maintenance required Routine Action., Deep Section Cleaning Maintenance Indicator: Infiltration Rates are not met once'' installed' Field Measurements: Infiltration Rate Test Inspection Frequency: 1. After Autumn Leaf -Fall (November) 2. End of Winter (April) Maintenance Activity: If rate test is failed, consult the design engineer/installation firm for recommendations, Varies per maintenance required xhib'itC„ Page 3 of Umm Water Quality Sanborn Avenue Parking ,R Lot --------------------------- Ap%pendix 10: 'Educational Materials BMP Fact Sheets, Maintenance Guidelines and Other End -User Y, ' 3.3 Permeable Pavement Descry pton Permeable pavements can be either pervious asphalt and concrete surfaces, or permeable modular block. Unlike traditional pavements that are impermeable, permeable pavements reduce the volume and peak of stormwater runoff as well as mitigate pollutants from stormwater runoff, provided that the underlying soils can accept infiltration. Permeable pavement surfaces work best when they are designed to be flat or with gentle slopes. This factsheet discusses criteria that apply to infiltration designs. The permeable surface is placed on top of a reservoir layer that holds the water quality stormwater volume, VBmp, The water infiltrates from the reservoir layer into the native subsoil. Tests must be performed according to the Infiltration Testing Section in Appendix A to be able to use this design procedure. In some circumstances, permeable pavement may be implemented on a project as a source control feature. Where implemented as a source control feature (sometimes referred to as a "self -retaining' area), the pavement is not considered a 'BMP' that would be required to be designed and sized per this manual. Where permeable pavement receives runoff from adjacent tributary areas, the permeable pavement may be considered a BMP that must be sized according to this manual. Consult the Engineering Authority and the WQMP for any applicable requirements for designing and sizing permeable pavement installations. Silting Considerations The WQMP applicable to the project location should be consulted, as it may include criteria for determining the applicability of this and other Infiltration -based BIVlPs to the project. Permeable pavements can be used in the same manner as concrete or asphalt in low traffic parking lots, playgrounds, walkways, bike trails, and sports courts. Most types of permeable pavement can be designed to meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Permeable pavements should not be used in the following conditions: 0 Downstream of erodible areas 0 Downstream of areas with a high likelihood of pollutant spills • Industrial or high vehicular traffic areas (25,000 or greater average daily traffic) • Areas where geotechnical concerns, such as soils with low infiltration rates, would preclude the use of this BMP. ............... ...... Low Impact Developmew Bev Alanagement Practice Design Handbm;k 9,,20! 1 Page I Sites with impermeable Oftentimes, Fire Departments do not allow alternative pavement types including permeable pavement. They r- :•uire traditional impermeablefor situation, it is acceptable to use an impermeable surface for the fire lane drive aisles and permeable pavement for the remainder of the parking lot. is " �. ` is yy ► "' � "` # : ' i 4 :.. ... .�:.'. .'�� ::. ' :.: ..: .:�:: � '•� : ° ::r!' :. :�::_. �� :..: is .s � : # w.. MP ERM FAME, DMVE, AME' Section A -A Figure 10 Impermeable Fire Lanes' PAVEMENT Y SANDLAY PERMEABLE fBvEMNG LAYFR Also, while a seal coat treatment may be used on the impermeable fire land, traditional seal s:.treatmentsi::^used on permeablepavement. Low Impact Dev elapmeru Rest r'# warners¢ t ?rac gee Design Handbook rev, 9:2011 Page 2 ,PERMEABLE PAVEMENT BMP FACT SHEET Setbacks Always consult your geotechnical engineer for site specific recommendations regarding setbacks for permeable pavement. Recommended setbacks are needed to protect buildings, walls, onsite wells, streams and tanks. Figure 2: Permeable Pavement Setback Requirements A minimum vertical separation of 10 feet is required from the bottom of the reservoir layer to the historic high groundwater mark, see Figure 2. A minimum vertical separation of 5 feet is required from the bottom of the reservoir layer to any impermeable layer in the soil. If the historic high groundwater mark is less than 10 feet below the reservoir layer section, or less than 5 feet from an impermeable layer, the infiltration design is not feasible. il Des — Im and Sizing, Lrjtena To ensure that the pavement structural section is not compromised, a 24-hour drawdown time is utilized for this BIVIP instead of the longer drawdown time used for most volume used BIVIPs. ................... Loll, Imp acal evelopment nesi X'fanqgefnew praaice Desigi Handbook rev, 9/20/1 Page 3 ,PERMEABLE PAVEMENT BMP FACT SHEET e ''�aa �' a !: i`i. ! • ` �: ■ Ideally permeable pavement wouldbe level, however most site will have a mild slope. If the tributary drainage area is too steep, the water may be flowing too fast when it approaches the permeable pavement, which may cause wafer to pass over the pavement instead of percolating and entering the reservoir layers If the maximum slopes shown in Table' 1 are complied with, it should address these concerns. Regardless of the slope of the pavement surface design, the bottom of the reservoir layers shall be flat and level as shown in Figure 3. The design shown ensures that the rater' quality volume will be contained in the reservoir layer. A terraced design utilizing non - permeable check dams may be a useful option when the depth of gravel becomes too great as shown in Figure 3. Figure"3: Sloped Cross'' Sections for Permeable Pavement Low Impact Developnew. Best 'fManctgenfent Practice Design Handbook rev, 912011 Page 4 PERMEABLE PAVEMENT BMP FACT SHEET NON-POROUSCHECK DAMS e • �:. eWill,i '�. d off:: ♦ i.. is 6 g: i °' i '' i.: .. i ff: i • • f • f s r: is r pi4V designTo assure that the subgrade will empty within the 24 hour drawdown time, it is important that the maximum depth of 12 inches for the reservoir layer discussed in the procedure is nist exceededThe value shouldbe measured i : i.:est elevation of the slope (Figure !: Minimum Surface Area The minimum surface area required, As, is calculated by dividing the water quality volume, VBmp, by the depth of water storedin the reservoir layer. The depth of water is found by multiplying the void ratio of the reservoir aggregate' by the depth of the layer, bTH. The geoid ratio of the reservoir aggregate is typically 40%; the maximum reservoir layer depth is 120 ♦ i is '" # f '` f �,. V y Low lmpaa Development Best Management Practice Design Handbook rev, 9,12011 Page 5 Liners and Filter Fabric Always consultyour , eotechnical 'engineer for site specific recommendations regarding liners and filter fabrics.. Filter fabric may be used around' the edges of the permeable pavement; this will help keep 'fine sediments from entering the system. Unless recommended for the site, impermeable liners are not to be used below the subdrain gravel layer, Overflow An overflow route is needed in the permeable pavement design to bypass storm flows larger than the Vamp or S' clogging. Overflow connect is acceptable discharge point such as a downstream conveyance system. Figure sIncorrectRoof Drainage z.Fi;NT Low Impact Developmew Be.v Nianagerraem Practice Design Handbook rev. 9,2011 ;e 6 r was r rr ,�. Waylent Coss ad. wd vast at ad AS ads 414, Caen care% �> r S � ai L ,d hiest i d ei} applied to lawns ,,,{>.,.. .d garrleziswash'' A and prf► ae a c strearns. In add; t o , ;laird clipOngs and {iif f leaves can wa �,h nutrients and arga is natter to streams. using a sdakar hose inst-tad of a apriWar, o, if5e pesticides and fertilizers Spain& Men :use Is necesaayg use these chen�ncals, in recommended a:m=. nta. ".151e, 'organs r �::ii ch or safer pest control poss,lblr' 4 Compost or r .i.l :l . yand waste,Don't leave it. in the street or sweep it into shirm drains or Area,. a. �zed in landscapir.�� projects, Auto care Ong the Storal newer Systenn. Dumping dra w has be uame Qt as into Baas rh .y, A, a oom .wmW car' gash that treats or or xzsh your car a�� .:kid so C1 e the ot� nd: # Repair .eak ,�nc, Wpose of used auto ON, a=wd battene,� a, designated drop,.dsrr i.x ; f iin laid at€€:i€; r :' irrS36• .. porlr am maintained septic i s%jsterns re ewNe i.i_,.rierita and pathogens =', acteria and ,Aruses) that canbe picked up into nearbywaterbodies. Pathoge,na czn cause p,_, ,ic heath pro -Hems and c riremr Inspect yrfi it l5ysl em ,.a e—y years and p;MP your tank. as neesary ievery A Don", dispose of household hazardow- aste in, sinks or { .,4r.:5::Cs{,.. ....t•<....k,i .,,:� .sk&Y. fiif:t..ii.Sf � <.,.isc.. d2r !Sr,%; t sr, r•:. ,l, .,y f r•c t••,• ,.t:, 4.:+.. Owed &Acap"' �d-�i�;��k;`>� ���c�''�#$•{f�`r}t��^^C,adai �.r i�i t�L`+flf rf <r a�f3L� ii`•'i{W,St::,tT�:�t; 'j}3)"s.ks,.c;`:i f�l� G;3'iF'�. 3" C�Sri�t3'; ;S? E�4a�A � i8a �ti3i3 �'tt'v�Ir�rt'3 tii��.flp €Sztr''}`sw>3i; qstemn ,, �iow rain sn ,w1ne r to soak Mon Bar'rdg--- A;r3,i Can c.r�ll;f:E; Iciif}3bat'3:fi:f `:fs'i�"E Pet waste t wave can be ks. mkta' r : "sE ; of h+ orar- g Wass rii.iii:ants f Raba GaMens and � Grassy ales-:-:-:-spe6aily ;r�p � 3dEa'�'`n i#�Gi��+�.''f' k Ot; 3f<F`el aF' ,lf OWF'OM your pet, remcn ber to pick yip tih3 waste and, dispose of it ptoper y Nusi ,,in pet wave is the best'cl oposM' r'rie';hod. Lea ,'ang;vset. ,Wiast.e on the -, round ncre -,,;a? Y , public I.ep tti risks by allowing hi rrnft.l ba€ zerla and'.iur.ienM to wash hoc t'ie a_ n-n. ,ram and e'-,'s nt€ aily rotas l ral `visa} nmye ,3i:fms can i.;row'ide naugal'Qc ; 10, : r and �oai~ i"lYc'k i 1mrn r f,f4f 1'u>1��€3<Le.i dfr .... rooftop Oreas Cyr Paved 4 i s£: '�Ea=�'iCf:•E3` into these areas ralba- :... Wgdawd Fiiter of • vet r N gmw or pl,-E s rit #k: a€fir' E •r 5r u `1 ear strearfr 6 ,h y -reap toe oh(.:manU sL�krrrta �4€>r PEcks; µp as i` f owu ,, if'r 'a5 , rf's'tj ;1 �"3d `ri eets. �'.rt, -Ai, and d1-..,r-hat'cr llect in par�y(y.�:�gJ` 1n,, are ��7�:vvted [�,���h,�s can �e tC} Sled inz'o -he --4torm w��::'C:e system Jo-3 tiiz a1o`trEnd :.titorm }C`rr d�.li}:,•f..r.}.xl',.`.r and keep them clean to a,,,e id leak-5, pep r,: an-y ,heal .a; spT to be l,..z.-,l : k"ovv the best way to keep 5p{� s �,mE";`; hi;irrni `5,,, the e !eIr; i€!3t';€'¢ Car, cat. rs t ttia���frE .skies Can 4?: k- ,r.i `..i, oH, C}rEd intc lcca� w<"arere;3. d. e'i ��At fences" vehicle roud ), w#�' areas,... ovai prorei"" k of vegmat or} on smeambanks can lead to erosion€, con_r.b:.€i,iw excessive a oi<r�S of scdirnent m :oca!de5. pf'- i E es car, p'Qison a adc animals and 'lead alga,-' blooms, Livesto'k in sx:`eam-'; Ian wo%#..alnh_'�ate viater,iayswith bacteria, ri#o-��,gS;k ��4wn unsafe fo, l:ur a,, contict. 0 Keep livemock amy town `? ear'."6U3 nks and p:'oV'idt-, them a water �rom f f f ::..f mf f IMIr St._3r i t#£ rx # {3' {{) o€ sr r 3 ?s �r 3 14i In {: ... ......:.t> rar...L:urdar"Ef:.�; with .< . % ` # {oai'::r3 x€?s 1 g.3i.£ :'g.} Plan, >v , •i).:' wy.:}� �y, (',` .{ Y > "LY`3�w `y:43 3 s, Y l F �y ' � - f e'J" .. • •• �}�CF� �xv,. i.: Y•. �tr4 )v.1wa�L��}}v:i. wi�S��l3ai r i#w. wi-.'ti. 1- FIT7 Appp y fert€li7ers and Qr.3 ..3>. ,.) accc=rring to 1abei gym} €r ,tractions to "ave M .. .: ............... .N .:Y:3p'.t:: .. { 3 'o..,can resin t ,€# .%•;f.,..):•:);;:;r� •ti+= r t..l:�� #,spy:; {; g to Y£'.vL`,r'.r. Y£3 ill E'i an, :ost � f<� :<��?�i ie�a ° '<.€ ➢c:,,.�.3. +v� f.<s€,iE a;7i�?rr�� �.."i�Ff" €r#1:i,r''tik� ,�>sl .�i�,U;':, ,_�C�: ::...........n•::::..;; :. ... ...:.:::::::::: •., f r7 i` s �r.,,#(i s.;... tr and tb.,:€ i3..>' r#s}l fi f , v PI" .> slca.l "••). .. ';• ,fir :E' e,..,} ) {),< x Se) �� ¢a • : { e . ,, .i., Lo % �- r ,•v„ c up Opilis; Provice i"over '# i's'~`�3�'r )� i"I':i33E�ri3<S:3 ,-t�•�F ',�1.€€�?�}� �k3 �'3:'ws�:`ta P--" and other �vom being ln�tall and f.4r3iri°.�#3.1 �:iE,'�#�f.� r Sr;}:r.. �..f•,#�. �n rec�--nt years, awqr;�w,,ess Q.-� ti�e need to pro"ect watpr qua�y As a result, federaL stagy e, wd local programs have beer; es!ablished-' k) red�jc,e polluted discharges ',o our waii�j,,vays. The ihese p-ograrmis to prruven't po��Ution it's, rnucji arul T.han ui., ':�ter the Tac:." System (NPDES) in 19Uthe Fede'r,"i ciear, Acs vvas arnende'd �o � f wnevvork mgmUng IndusN.i NPDE-�-" p�;rmi, C,�i#fom� a '",iPIDES is k.. by 3he :;tale Conzroi "Board (SWRCB) and Me nwe (9); RegiDnPI Wa,"er hn certin i3 dus,.6ai ani --q,"�riufac�unnq Cmempe unwr Me houslK Wivii-tes S,Orm, ,Na-er GeE e� ,fl Pe. i� E1: lhe, t,�,pe, fadups or Operauans OHS imo one of 'fie sevem�-,ateg broclog, €#Trask Lafa of ihe ci"SL•.f.<�F� .n3#t3 £. 3G' :#y Lv t.4u+ an xyt:fcsW :�y. Mo if-;�fGs, tak:�f.€iu€€€fFuE .3is1•t.. 5�t.s#s�. �'�:a€t.��t-�fEFk�[t. <".32aay YWF EUN: Region '1=`f'3#t?` WE£€fW t `umt7E.. S�ti'rlf`u �fi �b�f��t.`Sscis3 t r`£4.3r fCe ..i€E�4`�f3�.�E3Fi�FF:. 3•� iF tr:<C�€�rt��E-s3#�'�L,:akr#:�ri£.. kf �}, <:if�`atf s�;,at�r�'.'. l t.h*t:. t}�tz'.,f:iE.t`t:f':: G4kuE F. sif333t; F,:r'ea• F:?Ls:F y.F':e;?SF`FE;...,,k'F : ' .%E3Sf.:; t:Ec..,...EEF:S:.e._. anY v'C4'-'-d €r F..f£¢a IE „kF.t. f we l i:i OlaG G i' fsfr a E€s. paper, and J t.Y..ff:£<.3F,, NO ...z; }G.f 4t'., y i,.A.L.em kfs F :3 lF%}3 `FE£f%:£.'t1#•GuE 3t fi nrn€,;3{: G ,G;:Ci:F .f£ �' ;3#Cff ,� #4, .•.t t .5, .. ;iy in,, yfE3:a:i: an.d .Scat u .f#3 iy FEd ?£Efsf• of` rsora ii:n� .an`Cf OR and ga; s z•}#.:k. a t. ,..e.,f_€. F.fft,:3, A r .mtk I UK omm :;rt";-4"t?a song, cz£ a ttEE.>7 u, a, tf`o-: apen rss€>r ih+aicome MMMA mp'33:&.5 W s.£u€ ss q. €€ '°�. � rE car::;Ff, ,..•sFo.f t .,its C9... •:l£x fIl f �Ezr:i _ 33 t:!€:�sF t� E:afs€� .,s�'sEi„r fFt s; t�•t ;�{y sewage yaws, and nuMoN, VAHNS , I gomsmon powl €s r G`Et, .ift.. power ,FJ �tF 4E t., t t#t kF €.f €fif 03 n`t `sn Efs k': E£EfF•iii E"S, iGzi �stuy5, Et•,{3 :S ..3fi{3:: ti.�, .it,:ff€..3.�^f:E. t Et.,3n•. � is ,f','. coi34;f2.< .F.33f 7,_E# .;C`.Y; E� 3(.v`:}f:t�F `... 0000s.t.: have 4,3a'ln#F,.ft. ,a a 32 .333.1: &W rFY3wwq #e's3',e6w #? a som. Mai ,tFa ,t . '.aa_3wa }rrkfs: m.0 t..1F. ti.s .#�. t;;fE}.r>.#f' F€ or How do I oUgin caveea e under the I dusillal MOW Storm Watee'GeneraE Prmft? „€sa:7 Gs3.tt3p's €f sis.,irtt t.k4e.o ,ot:'{,c.a€ ;c,<... s.FrSa cy�,. ly fk� fNC, ,3k": .,�;. Lac s• , �`:v kf� is sF � ?�€ Ft.fsn f %3Gc, fin. <a t"_t.rsi'.t _ CtE. EEtFp ,E. ? ��dF.E f1 ss .}t. _su s1 .`EE ;€' •=3u�,k.,4.f:`.f jt}tEFf:f%��,e y!iFFt�.i1.F`�f3S4fk :SGtE#f },.`Eis._..Ey�:t,.`%tSE.,ti....:3 .tE...t?.,f?Ik tEE£:i3:33.fF.Kt_s';a14'C3i€i. .ctk 'n£c, #.33>.,once tt•.s;�; {<.;tit:k;i.Et.t�.,...i..x,.�s.,,�f.r..,.t._::t.. .E.3.3, E_ rC7`: F„ <v and mpomom hem.. .,,,. ... r onr Sio "x A NaySWpn N&W Ds�-hat rgs is— af)�, A B P hs , , , :It$£%lttii"f�# iZ3 a`� E`Ztt,`£, £?fntf? }t ;;i3fiF 3i7{ F„ r33S€ :33, ..Ff FtG'f?>i t, t„L`?`�f'�`trGC'cEh;n�f +t"4 {3fJr� #<t-ji b'.?r`F�i3ff7 of f`fJS£FF'?f;S�t�t??f7,f,�i'F}t f1l,ctt?Yff2 v)2F3itr;. ic3r. XnF��FLyFt}t�j _ Cii;tirPF t4tfFrFFY £�� t.3at,`i�a2: �{*<4f12< F1'?Y Ff4L�it<f'�.`.`. 3;G£ft aPC3f?};"??�i�, 8r 3"+53; 3;�:4F�#�5"iffy `}£; 6S,�rsf,:4t'?fF F��.°,�3 cfff`��.:35: t,C3f7 �St Ex�:#t•r eft ;F75_FjifGif-'� .'��fi,"�li �-�` f��U<j b9'RStSf'uCfF<ii':£?.,. ,t5.)'tC:{,t73ft kf£?Ff3€JIFF Wafer .:r UFFred fe i<Fff :. 4(Ftff<eifr,,tt tti<3tt FFe"-?3, FM" t f ii.,ttflxtt" c�9'.S, f?f Gf�r.s€..13;':, U't'fi}rYFf}t�: FCss:Ft'?�stfn G'E>`,-k;lf?":; iltttt"fF::.f::f7stC}�tf...;;>t if3+FfFr}sif Fi UY.rt#Q: t^iE �F ,y :iiF{{IFt:'t .7 it;`lG..Fi£,�.,tt.i,!!liiF,;:.3#f.^4 tFri<Ft.S'3liC.I ti"t rC G�F33C.2�r..f:F. : S4i F:tFiC i�ii,tl.1£2Sf .-24„i tlf?��;�ra, f%r'���: x`#71 f,C}F?73lFSf3;`IfrfL, ee73i:t ff"f'yt it CFF !Jf `}FE Ftlr3 lfi li3`§C FF?+� W3kflfiFix r+ir fFj >. � f t FL'f?Ctt}#t#f FFF 3Ft LF '�F:fl Jtit£ VFft� F' r;FE17tl1 f{ftr !i ,�a :ts x � � `tart. l,7Ff <3. t�.f tt ttFF.,, fl,�cla!f,s �F., ,x,#F. .>f?:.t f,4'Fli f r ..^y`:' ,"Y�...:•; c4Fil�. u.tsx 14 C,f Tf < <? � F..„t >Gf-�Ff„EG.I btu.• . Ff...t. ll7 k ..,f..f - - _ Sf..N+ J' Lf e r'� !J .✓.f. ail/:. Jr ............... - ... ....... ', Wyly # •clF r :.<:C' E3E:)>r..,i�'c�E3f;,���,i��s>^•�ift3a�i �1s;,�d€:'' i'•f+.7.••S`d'ifS':: ,Sv`52 r�rJ�irtza'�4?� Mumma AND Mu#`a# ows WAS1 E. Mumma To OR A , GAMWAHMMM. mww" Room 1-800-506-2555 S � Water G.: . t fr;+ F::tF:k�F:kk�F:FffFFF:•:•:•:•:�y.:y:F:F:FFF:F:F::F:;r''., "• 3 ; 5 t < t a k r::•:•:::toFF:F•�FFF:FFFFF:or•::.:::: r•::o:•:fFFFFFFf:. •'':. .t `C k #Y F ou Should 'r f 5 .:. j r. .... � :.. �..1 ,'.£>3 .iE...�:.i$11 •....' �f..t.. S_: r`:5. �.�E F :.�. .. ft 7'.:.....:.3 SUM .�..k^ F' ;: i SWMI -E:#� r i,e � �i ,�.. r ...>{a.,s,. ,�£s.€ :>�C.Er£3 .,.<siEi- The ,.iaiET:£ •::: J •:::::::::::::::: •:. J ::. . dS.efii, ..,t1rk,4 _.E£. ik_1t3dt3 Sf hc.....,�iit. .:........:..:........ zF.z>F>FFFFFFFFFF FfFFF:FFF:.....:; ;.. � � ,...:••:,•::.�:.:::::::•::: ,..3,..,I,�._,a....,. t....s ....i3..€E..EEEs.. �.,,s.E� z,;stsf t �3t.%. (Fst �rc��s?t t:�s^ii?t�.£ei :'•.>.ad.a.j-..a,iuF s :ice -sr.�.�:<.:.,..:o#'•:/:�.���1#;;•<>:�F•k>#°?ii:��%s•.`•'rrr''S<�>:%'>•'r�..:•': :::•sss:•s:•s:•ssfffFfff:FFF::fFFfFFFF:k:•:::<•.{,FF:r:: l £<siF3.. �TS1t3SS:El. C �. J::42£ .# j;> fs3r.33tC? 3e;E€E3EzEi�d,r&3�t,i;".� 'ILF ?,.r4'a Fftt' 0.3 'C� w :� ' V CAR CARE c,<�ifrFk ���?�sSt3Sz1 �'a"'i<4'•f�CS. £'335+,£ ?�S,��St2i ji3^S . t sy':fF g F3#CE3 i y' S3 ow �..N ,canc :'•'} :]Ca�3.£f<3 fift't<3EFk EiaEiFiE.:sY# S`3< ;� cit irf`,it` ' f;r �E;EEtf�oaf3�., 33 if. 31.a3` t.}£€ , E '•C� ,33 # ,:7.YJ `€3`•.,.:EfS:'.'.0 a, ,. „' Bi I�EFi '�$3i,f'{�c ;i3,33'`E ba,;t",t ��,23EcE3 -:;eQi7r`. E•`F'[3{£Er[7i33?f f{`2cti F i c3d,'."i `.Y c3.,,:much a's C,2O a Vou t.,,Ei E,Si3£`k:FYo-`F: c c3rEf#:F.,iJ•$k'?. : £ 3i"c%r i3 gC>?cfndwes p!, Progromm Simce },. evr is irq . r,.{Iuflon s wsuch, easier, and less CU..HI Man s, a l,;ing up Ih, , the { :lies and Cc ply of Riverside pioqfarn infoirns c;., ? anti: busushows mi paHubuy pC'c.idt.°Ba°I n wiadms _.ich: a5 ihii The { Ws and CoMy of ism t',Mf love n rJpEf,d::i !t#3Ck's n >y fc., 6i r°1wn 3 Vuhnqe:t t u 1 . In cr..3f+aati e tAdA We (E f£ SKY Klam Use Incal Wmwalwr win Hit ; ri, 11a We uhNcftt"rge of S'J3...;�.. irile) the .a„Ai +3 d m w yV.,m or k ._I sm f.km mm vra..'.'.T....r 3d Itul..C... ; ES11:5 miiEf3,# 5c4;E"iE ing at anmmezy ga vJitna xy nFla.d dis:'. fs.t;'✓akdals. PLEASE NOTE: 't3 ,"rA"i ion pw it r) is, the hosing JfaLAs} (t t)F3' x. ' # ..,;: •:g3;:.Ihi S IWAYGy Mshes PO v:i= .£"Ffn ITASSAmd1r3in x0mbim, The 7i�aeai 3t...r� rsf ,Mt,a£:l . 3s sfrictiy prohibitod by oc,-i, . ad' OeAl rraie: ;;fk...Ek as away k orn Mi3rM or M:nl# I draiM :.,5ame ajtorasofrve" fluOs c.},"t s,.r,€ me and reayr.En incter 5 amwe>.3Jn, daE. mismon fluid' and gear cik f }rarr e3xs u,d as amor f on c0MIes ir.,.,nftfi hZnd.e as ra raxa 4vc eta; < ZrREltt t', �•" ..# 00 f w w 3; preventing L90.% and Spills rff ` AvoidspMs by empty€pcf and Mpimj drip pans ea hen yrYu [nave Pham Er, anott w vehi W or hthW In" M-e MUNI, I . Rou ne y AM aquip rert to IMPe up si) lfs [pair kaks- . AWM lage pins it an inttaturata ;, maim, .res ri"E arEctr;r'1e? �scL,£ ra >�r, :�: €seen vrmcked''vohi4Aes''or "vasrtu'`Cti~r"eu peer} an site; * € eap df•y absnibont rraEnri €s arEPOr a 'J{q.'s,,juf f'v;#Ui E3 iE uk�o^'i ':33i €' artJ f's'3' £i3Ei. ••S"7�: s�'.. * Contain large wp.tts,tYsf£ awold j, ciia,# orShM h,c rise,':. ;tt� ra s £ rPioyoestst,ate lami13av'd,th hazomous SPH response plao�: and pro tics e,.. 5, i€lentity and Control waste —water chischarges 9 Emma Ed sMp ftoOr drYins ;Yrf# acti#d to ti?e sarfi€nary s9wer. : sY¢..<'K wnh tha local se#liar au€i Tvnty rp4ardtrt� t;r� ittisnt� or 6that ¢Bfiu(rr;rrfrEEY1S :. po!;A signs to presrent disposai of iiquia3 kid nt€t 3 6. 3k. f;taas:_a�p rsr^nr ,,,at:v dt#h Y :. dry aas rdu o VNt ? t h #n a�iowinq Dispose t-x the, Zbsort exit x, darep rf;op',YQ K(Iep tha 3r£.a) dean rathar Hm .: Maas , or a t,wE nrop � �tZsrs' Ys3ti c: ,and sfr ? bra a*�s ? r:aEa� zx Return: asod'ba ar,,33 to a barrara vendrv. £.onAM cr:ar;€aa,d 7ciE.:Yrs s io pro oat h,sza dour, spift,; 6. Cleaning Patu OF pa"'s:.."Wa her to prevent ..- s at'ven€s and gmase Um aniari t; a Sa'h M ar s9MM Isj r�ira �'r £tE3€}rti ,fz- '. g. MaM Grtraditng and Finishing '£.:'at<rt? mew (stirs.; , in art opcc, o-.,nn ,m.t o" OP 3 terpa3 n. Sweep frEiN a£ea W proven.t °msMa r..#.ta#s .aYrdfa#iras:- 10, Stodag and OMpoMng of Waste separdety, 2r ptace tuquio wasm t 1 3Y is u! £ E i NrS€ 6Wftmn a boned e..7arr.ndsFy z;arska £YrTt�rEf. Was, f& : covc:f : ou;c oQF stonajge areas to provooE: a r LLa##ter trEi dt. watssr C Ned used pals R,r t ahva xy to a sr t ,r Otet denier' �'i � #�.i . ,'.,zf.sra 7i ez F . rft...?�tEi# tr's'iw'YY # :•E :or' i ..ta ci ''ciusart our 3yo s and o+„tt ase r,wphs 5 bwk, I I Outdoor Parting and Auto M aintonance gE Teat o tdoor areas a an exk' r)sicn of ,your. servirs; Mys at avoid Using afterak mm 4 Sweep asp I , "rr arW Iq Tom OW&M park 9 and mWMarrance meas Cfc not nose down avaa<. tSt_mnomm vsadischarges are pfr?nEt'1,Eer. Drain Work areaars to a sarMary drain, fAher than a :Morn. drain[. Cortwthe, t,cai sower authority or, Mete rminu . f praire-atment is and Other Steam ciaenaing -: "ForCyt;�•Zsjo,•:rit: car oxterior .hr ''JY:z1t �.r„ea and'—,.v.,ii fl3poff to .a' dsca ed araa3 dn.;.E..:..Yt.Y{4Ea . tia ,r:ltfr in f;?f:r n W"a ° of to fr "n antine of'1p aria CAea"w,.q or :°(cam �,it°.YninF� tli#Ltira f^:i+J :tor,+{ 14 _item.(, gu o , f.r .;f;Xm d n. M� Cleaning Work Areas & weeper r'{x;u rsE.le¢#�.-Jlofluo'`(irzyase£;tiy, Damp rnop sett:rk areas afu } hose ftavan Do m3t pour [Mop '[slat' oto the p *ing lot, ,xre»f,, s�,tEEaar rsr utiaYr£r dr;##rf-. po sssiEY e our frm guide: or, 20 ways u water-, For on the .................. To receive: a list of in your } flogo WIN 0 SO FAMYS its typically a-, welcorrwd sight it, fbsn,-,�rside Cotin"tty. It cIeav,',,,,s the whr amd I o 'des um with a valuaWe resnoWCO - VV!Itttr. S U' , ",' Mwater is t,.,,,stmHy Pr vi um;, rm, clew"s- But, as it Vows over our street,, and yards, it carrives poilmdants into the storm nVa C 0^1 twlmat`�,,-s If,/ e jo, blhlsm? 11he pmbiem is . . . sbrrn drains carry pdk"'S &�-eddy to r'me,.n-, �ake,,,, fit ormm.vab/"�'r pofiuHo.n causes as much as •MOM of ou,- water pCoWbo""l proWem R jp""'<"'Pawdize�,�� tv�le, qua,,kty of mtu' wyatwrvmays and pwmm F% 'tht"/"mt to yesouraws ,f P/O bla ts P/ -""Aam'-"� ft'<nx h Alm an'."-"� ot'�; pa.f, and fimr-;.-� cap and y;,,rds and hHhWe% .0 I Be a wirl cof e solutlfcom! It"-x". purvablern ... now Ws Vn.we, fiov-,,;flH. �-�,�s R Aw Aw-ver pout anythul"g,' !�own a 'i' !"n-, with lawli, Chernkals, WQ gasoun% pot wastes, mulow,''cle avid safely dispose of used W and house ,,M' duvllpw,g to roc t 6/1 Ne s a bo, u�F S'0;"mv w W e,r P 0 u t 0 vi rv`"" 0 v,, p/re till 0 h eI P, ij Ca11the Proto'"on, c Program for a ory -�'-"'ffne' a ffi""'r plat Wes for the v-vome and garden,