HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot 59-66,76-86 Precise Grading LEGEND
HIGH POINT At
�FG1'bV/,� y�pAO
PAD ELEV. -0.J' IN.
TOP OF CURB 0000. 00 B L S 0 %10
T. C. P A L 0 M A E_ �, hi
FLOW LINE F. L. r 'Z-° S��
ZUB 1
HIGH POINT H.P. _
15' TYP. 15' Tr.WERE *Ex PRECI E GRADING PLANj VIA RAMI
FINISHED FLOOR FF 0000. 0 (EXCEPT C (EXCEPT D D PAUBA W
FINISHED SURFACE F. S. NOTED) NITEII N Cl
� tAcCA9E
Std 11►GO P '` '_
GRADE BREAK G.B. 1 1 i i ROAD ; cc
FINISHED GRADE F. G. xZ z 24135 3 ar-
Z ~ ~
W PROJECT SITE C>
GARAGE FLOOR GF 0000.0
PAD ELEVATION PE 0000.0 �• (Ff� �,�
14 A 0 Pico
�4 R01�
AIR RELEASE VALVE
MY. 79
TYPICAL SIDE YAR DRAINAGE (N.T.S. TO SAN DIEGO
A
FIRE HYDRANT `O'
5 ' MIN. P/L �� 0
DRIVEWAY 3 ' MIN. I ' VICINITY MAP
� 1A
STREET LIGHT p„� MUDSILL MIN. 6" MIN. 4'(p '!Z NOT TO SCALE
"PS
WATER SERVICE W •:� 11 *:
SEWER SERVICE
SLOPE I S 2% MIN. 2: I MAX.
1b
21% MAX. �6, EsPAAZA ' GRADING NOTES
SECTION D D � g �' 4 TRACT NO. I . ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER TO,
WHEEL CHAIR RAMP � �Z �� � '&
(N. T S. ) $ 5 24135 AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 457
� � a '
PROJECT SITE Aa A9 � -� 2. MINIMUM BUILDING PAD AND DRAINAGE SWALE SLOPE SHALL BE = I%.
53 g5 � 51 3. MAXIMUM CUT OR FILL SLOPES = 2: 1 .
12w MIN. ABOVE PAD ELEV. 8b
9 OpR Ep 89 4. PROVIDE 5 ' WIDE BY I ' HIGH BERM OR EQUIVALENT ALONG THE TOP OF ALL
Cjk FILL SLOPES OVER 5 ' HIGH.
ROUND OFF TOP Al 0019 • b1 5. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A COMPETENT
AS 4A Ab s2 A� SOILS ENGINEER WHO SHALL CERTIFY THAT ALL FILL HAS BEEN PROPERLY
5 ' 92SOILS
AND WHO SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL COMPACTION REPORT FOR ALL FILLS
LOT NUMBER X b gp � 3 , , 35 3b 91 ~� 93 OVER I ' DEEP.
3 3 0 6. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT TO CITY OF TEMECULA
45 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF ROUGH
INDICATES MODEL �+ A�w GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN PRIOR TO
4 SECTION B B (N.T.S ) ccq'� 1A IS ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE TO LINE,
UNIT TYPE 16 15 1 GRADE, ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF CUT / FILL SLOPES.
B FOR REAR YARD SLOPES GREATER01,53 2 2� � �9 �� �1 9
THAN 5 ' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT 'L5 Z,4T. PROVIDE BROW DITCH, DESIGNED TO HANDLE 100 YR. O STORM FLOWS, ALONG
INDICATES ELEVATION TOP OF CUT SLOPE.
% 8. FINAL COMPACTION REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL FILLS GREATER THAN
b �0 ONE FOOT.
6" MIN. 5' MIN. P 5 ' MIN. 6" MIN. 1 ,` TRACT NO. 24135-I 9. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF
THIS LOT REQUIRES A BACKWATER VALVE 3 ' MIN. I ' 1 ' 3 ' MIN. 6 ,�Z THE PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION BY:
PER SECT. 409 OF U.P. C. PER APPROVED — MUDSILL MIN. MIN. MUDSILL 4 5 b CONVERSE CONSULTANTS DATED: 1-17-09
WATER AND SEWER PLANS. (SEE INDEX MAP) o
� TWO SETS OF THE FINAL COMPACTION REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WHICH SHALL INCLUDE FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOM-
MENDATIONS AND CERTIFICATION THAT GRADING HAS BEEN DONE IN CONFORM-
ANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT.
w
MIN. 2% MIN. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT. TELEPHONE (909) 694-6411 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE
2% MIN. 2: 1 MAX. 6" TYP. 21 % MAX. REQUESTING FINISH LOT GRADE AND DRAINAGE INSPECTION. THIS INSPEC-
21 % MAX. TION MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL INSPECTION FOR
SECTION C - C EACH LOT.
II . CUT SLOPES EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT AND FILL
(N. T. S. ) SLOPES EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 3' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE
35.00 31 .00 33. 33 PLANTED WITH GRASS OR GROUND COVER TO PROTECT THE SLOPE FROM
EROSION AND INSTABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 457 PRIOR TO
rel THE APPROVAL OF FINAL INSPECTION.
PExxxx.x PE 0000.0 INDEX MAP 12. DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
FFxxxx.x 3.83 13. FINISH GRADE SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROM ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AT NOT
e LESS THAN 1/4" PER FOOT FOR A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET.
FF 0000.0 'O PE 0000.0 � SCALE : ( " = 200 '
FF 0000.0
C; v Lf) 14. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR SHALL SUBMIT
e U) CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PAD ELEVATION. WHERE SPECIFIC ELEVATIONS
503 ARE REQUIRED, THE ELEVATION (WITH RESPECT TO MEAN SEA LEVEL) SHALL
BE GIVEN. IF AN ELEVATION WITH RESPECT TO ADJACENT GROUND SURFACE
IS REQUIRED, THE ACTUAL DISTANCE ABOVE THE ADJACENT GROUND SHALL BE
¢ � `�0°°°'0 GIVEN.
15. EROSION CONTROL: ALL GRADED SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH ROSEA ICE
PLANT AT 12" ON CENTERS OR OTHER APPROVED GROUND COVER. SLOPES OVER
15 ' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT, IN ADDITION TO GROUND COVER, SHALL BE PLAN-
TYP I CAL OVERALL FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS TED WITH APPROVED TREES, SHRUBS, OR COMBINATION THEREOF. SHRUBS
SHEET INDEX CONSTRUCTION NOTES 6 QUANTITY ESTIMATE SHALL BE PLANTED AT 10 ' ON CENTERS, TREES, 20 ' ON CENTER, COMB INA-
SCALE : 1 "=30 ' TIONS, 15 ' ON CENTERS. SLOPES OVER 4' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL HAVE
2. LOTS 10-12 9 29-34 �• ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES PER
I LOT GRADING ( 19 LOTS x 15 C.Y./LOT) 285 C.Y. U.P.C. CHAPTER 10.R. Z
BENCH MARK 16. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED IN THE FIELD PRIOR J
TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION/GRADING. CL
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE B.M. NO. T-29-81 0
i I/2' BRASS DISC IN CONC. CYLINDER LOCATED FROM THE INTERSECTION OF FRONT ST.
17. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OR ITS AGENTS DOES NOT RELIEVE Z
AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, 1.8 MILES N.E. ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE NS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING ACCURACY THE APPL I CANT AND HIS ENGINEER FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COR- o
TO THE INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD,IN THE N.N. AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES ARISING AFTER RECTION OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON cr
CORNER OF THE INTERSECT ION I ' E. OF A T' CHA INL INK FENCE, 21 ' : 16' CITY APPROVAL OR DURING CONSTRUCTION THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE REQUEST, THE APPROPRIATE PLAN REVISIONS SHALL BE PROMPTLY SUBMITTED 0
AROUND SO. CALIF. GAS VALVES, 40' N. OF P.P. (NO.i) 94' N. OF THE CENTERLINE FOR DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. W
OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD. FIBERGLASS WITNESS POST SET I ' W. OF MOMXNT. THE CITY. to
ADJ. DATE: 9-13-82 ELEV. 1128.410 mU
w
D=
• APPROVED BY: SHEET ,-
BAS I S OF BEARINGS -OWNER/DEVELOPER Robert Beira, William Frost & Associates �0�rQ CITY OF TEMECULA I
THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A PORTION OF THE MESA HOMES � � A. T -�'+ � M
CENTERLINE OF BUTTERF I ELD STAGE ROAD AS SHOWN ON PARCEL 27555 YNEZ ROAD, SUITE 200 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS 9 SURVEYORS �� } -
MAP No. 23432 FILED IN BOOK 159, PAGES 3e THROUGH 61 OF TEMECULA, CA. 92591 WM :INCE OW DRIVE. SUM n :50, mccuu,, CAL IPW IA WM `' � TRACT N 0 . 24135-3 �
- RAYMOND A. CASEY R.C.E. 41880 N
PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF (9091-676-7290 1°°°' ►�x 4111091 neo 3
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BEING N 0 4' 2 5 '05" W + 4a090 * INCIPAL ENGINEER Ems. 3/31/96
Exx•.3-31-98 PRECISE GRADING PLANS 2 z
REv I EMED ® `� CIV 1�- �� CITY OF TEMECULA OF
DATE,& c��F DATE BY DESCRIPTION APP '0 DATE v
MICHAEL A YLMAN R.C.E. 43690 R E V I S 1 0 N S DATE:SIDW,3 LOTS 59-66 & 76-86 Q
J . N. 400571
\ /
WI
de 1254'03
T •G'
1255.5
T .G• u� L p1
1255.40 �' o�%. �O ro'l • �.? 'SO 57 .34
T.0' LOT 102 d� q� F6 s4
4
\
' ► .25 7 OPEN SPACE � 1 '=`G r • 03/ SB o /� .0 _
7.
C. S 4r x
P� 43.1
P 1253. g8 2" C ,�C 9 / �, o f. 0 1 � /z FG o0
\ CJ T. C. `' .r s,• s ti /t f G.Z
/Q�\ O ' TS �:yA bA a FL.,
ti
.34 � '(
254 \ 1°F 44. 92 I --- 1 i. 39.8
T .C. S /� S/ �,� s!.6 l� I N /&/, 1 / �.
�� FF /Z s3 9 •e FG- o l f6- _ 46.5 4,3• r Az-3.
48.5 F G 1 FF' 43.2 f
s2 S 3 6 2 p? \�\• / � / '8.8^ i PE 1246.S 1 gyp. 80 %, d• n
?S e
FF 1247. 2 � "� SCALE : I 20 '
/o' 1 PE 2p o
1253. 1 1 \ 1252• �S3 \ti V / �. / F� I 1 FF 1243.2 • 4� -s„o a'
T.C. T -G• e9 S3 / q -b" l I 016 1 :� 1243,8 N
L 0 '�9 ti /. •9 / / S/ / 78 I /D 4Q
PEAT 6T \� O FG a /� pE 13t I FG5
2$$• 9
x/v3
/ Tj / 112488 24�� • / g-S I 2 F 4
� � \ °'\�P //i S/. 2J�•� ` / /O• , I T 9 ��2 4q , �� /�4 '�?`� 5 oO
,� /• 1 •f\ 6 ,VO,w ,� FG .4
,\ S: c .�S 125 G• � ,ti s r / ;� � GF 1246.7 1
QS T • �\ 49.7� �� 4B \ _ 1 /2�3.t 43, z /O : \�Y
48.8 46. S
Sc, GF/24g•0 FC, FG
•N
/ �,. ,� �` c 3 q8 /145.4 t ,�
�Z G• S G` 1 fG 8 fL ?7 L.,G. W. 1 1 0 42.01 5 ti P 42 9�S il 4•
� / B_ � 6 w 5 0 - O � './ •cam - S
/ t" O c�0• �1r 47.7 e4 ¢ I 4 ti o� 1,X (; 4 v
/ i `'s e % 31 3 �. \2 G• 3' 02 er/ �;G 'R N e co( 41 • ,cam?J -, i-
dAl
� 0. 13 0.00 23 � Q A � o • -^ � -
ci�� p2 / .`� • 5 w a •• �CV Q
\.�N / ,p \ZA9 16: �ti,�• R$ �` 35 t
LOT 48 se i 1 �. J,�'�c ,� 9 w sq'
P E= 12 44. 3 s� " / 'OF �� 9 s2 J \� q3 4 ,Lai•� � PA R ZA �ti,<<' \�,p,`�' `_ _ 15 - �.y9 G• t -nom
-'• - �A _ - \ �• 106•
01 � S� '� / � �• S?S °� q� -•fes ' - - - - �h ap � -s � �' 1240. 1 /./• -- ---
�CP/ C' ���• p� V• �'LptC' \ o _= �5 /•/. `
LOT 49 s 1 !'
c' ,y'h `FC�' \IV /�e /�, �2 O ti 1 V s Alr V ` 1 Z G• 2 0 a �,, �''*� Uo
PE= 1244. 2 -._ .i SS c / '°F /�S /�, � J�.? � ti qs- 08 g- 3 5 �1- -n o - w w
.s �. Q� ry S 5 N
36.00 MCI 00 48.
s po� S2 .� g' C �tiy /N GF/2SU FG �! w °vel o FG
* �, S2 S �. ?!� /\
U. 0 48.S /# - 9 145.2 ` /? 1 �. �, 0.00
/ .•.mss y`' �/ / i FG �C GF1248 t. 7. FG r Je - '� ! 39-4 /•� 1 96
LOT 50 -�,y o //
1.0//C.)
/' S/,p Spa 49 G •/ •s. 9 46.a GF 1245.a t C•e� -
_ -
PE= 1243. 9 FF a •8 +° 6 GF 1247. �' + a
S8 '-• 1 ACc• /? / � �v � 1 1 +c � 0 . \ 59 203 Id 3� - - - /'/' w n. o
' - '' LOT 102
•�T /�r FF / 4s a ,�ti + OPEN
`'.� p• S/. G O .� ZSp• i 503 12 FG r \��� G 20 0 35= SPACE
L O T 51 / so / 9'8 ti v' FG I N1 N 45.2
-�,�, /, l +� 1� 2B 48.5 ^A � /A + C, • �,, w w 1
PE= 1243. 5 R / 62 / Spl v I '��* 1: so 1 s� f�' '
N I� FF 1247.5 �` �j �. w �,u
S9 B2 FG 1 FF 1248 I� PE 1246.8 1 S' I! 0
/ 49 °'�T• PE 2 : I \ i FF 1245.9 1CIA
� N
•8 ` F 1 124 PE 1245.2
LOT 52 -.. c� 49.8 / e•S 60 1 N �' N •% 105.00
CIO / - e
_ - 6
PE= 1242. 8 l '� o) 48 5 1 ! Fc FG �* 20 20 -
/ FG I FG oPT. FG 45.2 10 - - i•/•
0 48 55 46.8 L RLQ 46. 45.2 6 -p0
OT 53 ' 10 !d 1 F1N.r + o I �'� 1 IZ44 ��V. 22 - N -�\ rn
l N.P v 1 tv •
P = 1241 . 5 I /z44-S �• = 1 Fc; F 1 ��'�• rn m
LOT 54 63• BS *es iS I FL; HP. o 68.28 /? 3y " N w
IN
F4G.! 3J LA F5 a -+ N ^'
PE= 1239. 8 ' 63.83 1 l C' 3;p � 0%, A -:4 • 1
1 =O N J
LOT 55 2 tLOT 56 LOT 58 -n
PE= 1238. 0LOT 57 PE= 1232. 6 1 O a �^' .� 0 . 00.00 s
PE= 1236. 2 PE= 1234. 4d Idws LA
w � w 1
20 -� m p
� -r1 N
� 'O
,`• -v% U, - N N �1
N 1 a 01
ijh A vfl ^� L,, 1
Lo
N N
1 CA Uo N ` /•/. _ _ 100.0 d'BS
T C, / _ _ - - - LOT 87
PO 1 -- PE= 1233. 2
APPROVED BY:
�\ P / CITY OF Robert Betira, i/iitiam, Frost & Associates � TEMECULA SHEET
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS, PLANNERS 9 SURVEYORSy
TRACT N0 . 24135-3
� eeeirc. �IM >�. ��,,. �,�,,, ,��,. 2
` unn W11-8M rAX NMI srb-rs.e Mo. RAYMOM A. CASEY R.C.E. 41860
•\ 3090-98 • PRINCIPAL ENGINEER EXP. 3/31/96'
REV IEIIE° " clVI�. Clnr PRECISE GRADING PLAN OF
S
\ DATE: ��` ¢ 11 DATE 8Y DESCRIPTION APP 'D DATE
MICHAEL A. TY AN R.C.E. 43bgo -
R E V I S 1 0 N S DATE: s LOTS 59-66 & 76-86
J . N. 400571