Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout081792 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 1992 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order Monday, August 17, 1992, 6:00 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California, Chairman John E. Hoagland presiding. PRESENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Also present were Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Planning Director Gary Thornhill, Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske and Minute Clerk Gall Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT None COMMISSION BUSINESS APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chairman Hoagland requested Item No. 6 be taken as the first item of business after approval of the agenda. It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve the agenda with Item No. 6 as the next order of business. The motion was unanimously carried. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEM PlanninQ Commission Chairman and Vice Chairman Election Commissioner Ford nominated Dennis Chiniaeff as Chairman. Commissioner Blair nominated Linda Fahey as Chairman. Commissioner Chiniaeff withdrew his name from nomination and Commissioner Fahey's nomination as Chairman was unanimously approved as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AYES: 5 NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: AUGUST 17. 1992 Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey None Commissioner Chiniaeff nominated Steve Ford as Vice Chairman. Commissioner Hoagland nominated Billie Blair as Vice Chairman. The nomination of Billie Blair as Vice Chairman was approved as follows: AYES: 3 NOES: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford Commissioner Hoagland turned the gavel over to Chairman Fahey who presided over the remainder of the meeting. Minutes 2.1 It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Ford, to approve the minutes of August 3, 1992 as mailed. The motion carried as PCMINB/17/92 2.2 2.3 follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Ford, Hoagland NOES: 0 · COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Blair to approve the minutes of July 20, 1992 as mailed. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to approve the minutes of July 6, 1992 as mailed. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None .2. 919192 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ABSTAIN: 2 COMMISSIONERS: PUBLIC HEARING Chiniaeff, Ford AUGUST 17.1992 Variance No. 12 Proposal to erect two freestanding signs-one six foot high sign adjacent to Jefferson Avenue and one twenty-five foot high sign adjacent to Interstate 1 5 with copy for the Hungry Hunter and Jan Weilert R.V. on each sign. Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 6:10 P.M. Larry Bradley, Sign Tech Electrical Advertising, representing the applicant, concurred with the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close the public hearing at 6:10 P.M. and adopt Resolution No. 92-(next) approving Variance No. 12 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval. The motion was unanimously approved as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Tentative Tract Map No. 25277 and Chan.oe of Zone No. 5724 Proposal is a request to subdivide a 47.7 acre parcel into 96 single family lots and 5 open space lots and a zone change from R-R to R-1. Saied Naaseh advised that the item has been rescheduled to the meeting of September 21, 1992. It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to continue Tentative Tract Map No. 25277 and Change of Zone No. 5724 to the meeting of September 21, 1992. The motion was unanimously approved. 5. Development Aqreement No. 92-1 (DA 92-1), Change of Zone No. 21 and Tentative PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 17, 1992 Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2 Proposal is a request to subdivide a 96.9 acre parcel into 4 parcels and a 48.4 acre remainder parcel, A Development Agreement to ensure the development of the project as senior housing, congregate care facility, skilled nursing, personal care, a nine hole private golf course and dedication of a 2.3 net acre parcel to the City of Temecula, and a Zone Change from R-R (Rural Residential) to R-3 (General Residential). Commissioner Blair stepped down due to a conflict of interest. Saied Naaseh presented the staff report. Roger D. Prend of Albert A. Webb Associates, 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, architect representing the applicant, stated that they are in concurrence with the staff report, however, commented on the severity of the five (5) year time limit and suggested some additional language allowing the Planning Commission or the City Council to use their judgement based on the amount of financial contribution or improvement to the property instead of a five year limit, in the event of financial difficulties. Mr. Prend added that the idea behind the development is to have a zone change and a conceptual site plan/parcel map to allow a developer to come in and finance a project and the development agreement is the guarantee for the right to do the development as it is being proposed. Commissioner Ford questioned whether the golf course is proposed to be public or private. Roger D. Prend stated that although it is proposed as private, the applicant would like not to restrict it at this time and give the developer that option. Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 6:30 P.M. John Telesio, 31760 Via Telesio, Temecula, stated that he is in support of the project, however requested clarification of the following: what is the meaning of senior housing, and that the school portion will remain zoned R-R. Mr. Telesio also expressed concern that the senior housing portion of this development is proposed adjacent to the high school which might present a problem due to noise and lighting from football and other school oriented events. Bob Pipher, 41825 Green Tree Road, Temecula, expressed his concern that the area remain zoned R-R. Bob Kosslyn, representing Temecula Valley Unified School District, also expressed a reservation with the proposed senior project adjacent to the high school which may generate noise and light pollution during school events. Mr. Kosslyn requested that a disclaimer be presented in any purchase or rental agreement. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 17,1992 Commissioner Ford expressed the following concerns: Is there adequate parking for a public golf course? A reciprocal access agreement is in place until the future plans for the school are completed. What is the definition of a completed golf course as referenced in the development agreement? Commissioner Ford expressed these concerns regarding the development agreement: Page 18, 16.1 The number of units proposed in the development agreement is not concurrent with that stated in the market report, clarify the request. * Page 22, 18(E) Correct to read Pauba and Rancho Vista Road. Page 23, 19(C) States that the grading must all be at one time and asked if the developer been conditioned for immediate adherence to an erosion control condition. Page 24, 21(A) Suggest that instead of "developer" should read "owner" or "successor". * Page 26, (31) Request staff to clarify the reference to specimen trees. * Page 26, (36) should read "entrance gates". Page 26, (42) should include a requirement for clearances from the Army Corp of Engineers, Fish and Game, and Fish and Wildlife. * Page 29, review and clarification of access points. Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that conceptually the project appears to be good for the community, however, he felt that the Commission was being asked to make environmental findings that the Commission is not able to make regarding the following matters: grading impacts and erosion control number of units planned public vs. private golf course traffic impacts impacts of dividing parcel 2 whose property line is on the lake traffic impacts impact of the stadium adjacent to the project and the proposed mitigation a general plan presumption that this area will be zoned high density Commissioner Chiniaeff also expressed these concerns regarding the development agreement: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 17. 1992 * requested clarification of Page 3, M-2 and M-3. * reference to the potential for amendment and interpretations; suggest outlining what cannot be amended. * makes reference to maximum building heights and sizes of proposed buildings, however, the Commission has not been provided that information. Commissioner Chiniaeff concluded that he feels that the request was premature based on the information provided to the Commission to make e recommendation. Commissioner Hoagland stated that he concurred that the project appeared good conceptually, however, this is a major development and requires a major development review. Commissioner Hoagland expressed concern regarding the following: * what the impacts to the project and the surrounding residents would be if the school relocates the gym and other facilities as stated. * buffering of the school and the project with respect to noise, lighting, etc. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to continue off-calendar, Development Agreement No. 92-1 (DA 92-1), Change of Zone No. 21 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 2 to allow the developer to work with staff on some of the specific items discussed. Commissioner Ford added that the specifications of the senior center should be included in the development agreement. The motion was unanimously approved as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT Gary Thornhill reported the following: * Final technical sub-committee meeting scheduled for Tuesday, August 18th, on Growth Management. Also planning a Town Hall meeting for August 27th and a joint City Council/Planning Commission meeting for September 3rd. Anticipate going to public hearing with the General Plan the third week of October. * Temporary Sign Ordinance will come back to the Commission in three weeks. Staff has been authorized to enforce removal of signs in public right-of-way and PCMINB/17/92 PLANNIN{~ {~MMI~I~N MINIITFR ~ vehicle mounted signs. PLANNING {~{3MMI~Ii3N RFPi3RT None None The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission will be held on Monday, September 14, 1992, 6:00 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula. ~ary Thornhill, Director of Planning PCMINS/17/92 -7- 9/9/92