Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02_047 PC ResolutionATTACHMENT NO. 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE FOLLOWING: 1) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0298); 2) THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0075); 3) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING STANDARDS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94-0075); 4) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A CHANGE OF ZONE TO AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY (PLANNING APPLICATION 94-0075); AND 5) ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE RORIPAUGH RANCH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0299); ON PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 804.7 ACRES, LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF Bu'rI'ERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 957-130-001 and 002, 957-340-001, 003, 007, 008, AND 958-260-001 and 002. WHEREAS, Ashby USA, LLC filed Planning Application Nos. PA99-0298 (General Plan Amendment), PA94-0075 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment, Roripaugh Ranch Zoning Standards), PA94-0075 (Change of Zone), and PA99-0299 (Development Agreement) (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code, CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.070 shall be amended to add Specific Plan No. 11, the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and adopting the zoning ordinance and development standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan by Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on October 16, 2002 October 30, 2002 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to the recommended conditions, together with the concurrent recommendation on the Roripaugh R:XS PXRoripaugh Ranch SP~new\PC Staff Report 10-16-02XResos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 57 Ranch EIR and adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. In all respects as set forth in the recitals hereinabove, which are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. That the Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the Application, hereby makes the following findings: General Plan Amendment: The General Plan Amendment for the Land Use Element is necessary to conform the current General Plan Land Use Plan with the Specific Plan Land Use Plan and the General Plan designation of 3 dwelling units per gross acre. Further, the General Plan Amendment for the Cimulation Element is necessary to conform the Roripaugh Ranch Circulation Plan with the General Plan Circulation Map based on the findings of the Traffic Study for the Project. Specific Plan Findings A. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and Development Code. The Specific Plan is a reallocation and redistribution of the majority of the existing Land Use Designations and is consistent with the General Plan's allocation of 3 dwelling units per gross acre and serves as an implementation tool for the General Plan. Therefore, as proposed, the Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and Development Code. B. The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The project has been reviewed by agencies and staff, and is determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan (as it is proposed to be amended), Development Code, Design Guidelines and Growth Management Program Action Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan is a master planned community with specific design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation. Therefore, as proposed, conditioned and designed, the Specific Plan is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. There are no physical constraints of the site which would preclude or prohibit the requested land use designations or anticipated developments. Moreover, the proposed Specific Plan land uses are consistent with the General Plan's allocation of 3 dwelling units per gross acre and will serve as the tool to regulate and implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The applicant has submitted applications for Tentative Tract Maps for portions of the site which illustrates that the site is physically suitable for the land uses and development proposed in the Specific Plan. D. The proposed project will ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The R:~S PXRoripaugh Ranch S P~newXPC Staff Report 10-164)2~Resos and ord (EJP) - I0-30-02 approved by PC.doc 58 project proposes its largest lots in the perimeter of the Valley Neighborhood which together with the grade differential with the adjacent properties outside the site and the 30' fuel modification zone makes it compatible with its surrounding uses. In addition, the grade differential, prposed enhanced landscaping, and increased building setbacks will make the Plateau Neighborhood consistent with the Nicolas Valley. Therefore, the Specific Plan took under consideration the existing developments and surrounding zoning classifications to ensure development that will be complementary and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Development Aqreement Findings A. The City desires to obtain the binding agreement of the Applicant for the development of the property in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. B. The Applicant desires to obtain the binding agreement of the City to permit the Developer to develop the Developer's Project on the Developer's Parcels in accordance with the "Applicable Rules" (as hereinafter defined) and this Agreement. C. The Applicant has applied to the City in accordance with applicable procedures for approval of these mutually binding Agreements. The Planning Commission of the City has given notice of its intention to recommend the Agreement to the City Council, and has found that the provisions of this Agreement are consistent with the Specific Plan and the City's General Plan, as amended. D. These Agreements are consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare needs of the residents of the City and the surrounding region. The City has specifically considered and approved the impact and benefits of the development of the Property in accordance with these Agreements upon the welfare of the region. E. These Agreements will bind the City to the terms and obligations specified in this Agreement and will limit, to the degree specified in the Agreement and under State law, the future exercise of the City's ability to delay, postpone, preclude or regulate development on the Property, except a provided for herein. F. In accordance with the Development Agreement Statutes, this Agreement eliminates uncertainty in the planning process and provides for the orderly development of the Property. Further, this Agreement eliminates uncertainty about the validity of exactions imposed by the City, allows installation of necessary improvements, provides for public services necessary for the region with incidental benefits for the Property, and generally serves the public interest within the City of Temecula and the surrounding region. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. This Planning Commission has reviewed the draft EIR and Mitigation Monitoring Program and recommend that the City Council approve and certify the same. Section 4. Recommendation to the City Council. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve the following: A. A Resolution approving the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan contained in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; R:XS PXRoripaugh Ranch SPXnewXI:'C Staff Report 10-16-02\Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 59 B. An Ordinance amending the Development Code and adopting the zoning standards, amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Temecula, and pre-zoning the Valley Neighborhood as Specific Plan as contained in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; C. An Ordinance authorizing the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement as contained in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference with a recommendation that the City Council modify the required improvement of Nicolas Road from two lanes to four lanes from the MWD easement to Calle Girasol. D. All substantially in the forms contained in the above referenced Exhibits for the property located near the future intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 30th day of October 2002. Dennis C[~iniaeff, ChairmantY~J ATTEST: Debb~ Ubn~)ske Secretary [SEAL] S'~'ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2002-047 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30th day of October, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso and Telesio NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Chairman Chiniaeff Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:XS PXRoripaugh Ranch Sl~newWC Staff Report 10-16d)2XResos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 60 EXHIBIT A (For Attachment No. 2) CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION FOR THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND SPECIFIC PLAN R:~S P~Rorlpaugh Ranch SP~new~PC Staff Report 10-164)2~P, esos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 61 CC RESOLUTION NO. 2002- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0298 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94- 0075) ON PARCELS TOTALING 804.7 ACRES LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF BU'I-FERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 957-130-001 and 002, 957-340-001, 003, 007, 008, AND 958-260-001 and 002 BASED UPON THE ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, Ashby USA, LLC filed Planning Application Nos. PA94-0075 and PA99- 0298 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code, CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on October 16, 2002, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; of the based WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on ,2002, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved of the Application, and certified the Environmental Impact Report, made all required findings and determinations relative thereto and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Chapter 17.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code: R:~S PxP, ofipaugh Ranch SPXnewWC Staff Report 10-16-02~Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 62 General Plan Amendment A. The project as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The project has been reviewed by agencies and staff and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan, Development Code, Design Guidelines and Growth Management Program Action Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. B. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project proposes similar residential neighborhoods adjacent to existing surrounding neighborhoods as it provides a transition in lot sizes, with interface buffers and full roadway improvements. C. The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The project does not represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site. The General Plan Amendment is a relocation and reallocation of existing land use designations that conforms to the design of the specific plan. Specific Plan A. The proposed specific plan is consistent with the General Plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and development code. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and development code. The Specific Plan is a reallocation and redistribution of the majority of the existing Land Use Designations and serves as an implementation tool for the General Plan. Therefore, as proposed, the Specific Plan is consistent with the general plan, as it is proposed to be amended, and development code. B. The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The project has been reviewed by agencies and staff, and is determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan (as it is proposed to be amended), Development Code, Design Guidelines and Growth Management Program Action Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. In addition, the Specific Plan is a master planned community with specific design guidelines and standards that ensure compatibility and interface with the surrounding community in terms of density, design and circulation since it provides a transition in lot sizes. Therefore, as proposed, conditioned and designed, the Specific Plan is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. There are no physical constraints of the site which would preclude or prohibit the requested land use designations or anticipated developments. Moreover, the proposed Specific Plan land uses are consistent with the land uses of the General Plan and will serves as the tool to regulate and implement the goals and policies of the General Plan. The applicant has submitted applications for Tentative Tract Maps which indicate that the site is physically suitable for the land uses and development proposed in the Specific Plan. D. The proposed project shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood as it provides a transition in lot sizes. The project proposes similar residential land uses adjacent to R:~S PXRoripaugh Ranch SPXnew~PC Staff Report ! 0-16-02~Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 63 the existing surrounding neighborhoods, with landscape buffers and interfaces. The Specific Plan took under consideration the existing developments and surrounding zoning classifications to ensure development that will be complementary and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The City Council of the City of Temecula has certified the Final Environmental Impact Report, made all required findings and determinations relative thereto and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring Program after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan, as amended, for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan in order to approve the Application. Section 4. General Plan Amendment. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Application Amending the Land Use Element to amend the General Plan Land Use Map and to incorporate the annexation area into the City Limits (Figure 2-1of the General Plan, Exhibit A-1 ) and to Amend the General Plan Specific Plan Overlay Exhibit (Figure 2-5 of the General Plan, Exhibit A-2) to include Planning Areas 33A and 33B and amending the General Plan Circulation Element (Figure 3-1 of the General Plan, Exhibit A-3) to eliminate the connection between Nicolas Road and Calle Contento through the project and to change the designation of Butterfield Stage Road between Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Nicolas Road from 110' (Arterial Highway with 4 lanes) to Specific Plan Road, Add "A" and "B" Streets as Collector, and add North and South Loop Road as Specific Plan Road for 804.7 acres on property located near the future intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road, and known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 957-130-001 and 002, 957-340-001,003, 007, 008, AND 958- 260-001 and 002. Section 5. Specific Plan. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves mixed use specific plan known as the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP No. 11) subject to the Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit A-4 and as shown on Exhibit A-5 (the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Document Volumes I and II), on property locate near the future intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road, and known as Assessor Parcel Nos. 957-130-001 and 002, 957-340-001, 003, 007, 008, AND 958-260-001 and 002 subject to that attached Conditions of Approval. R:~S PLRoripaugh Ranch S P~newkPC Staff Repor~ I 0-16-02~P, esos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 6~ Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Department this ............ day of .......... 2002. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2002- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 2002, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\S PXRofipaugh Ranch SP~new~PC Staff Report 10-16-02~Resos and ord (E/P) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 65 EXHIBIT A-1 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN R:~S F~Roripaugh Ranch SPmewg'C Staff Report 10-16-02\Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 66 E~ Propsed General Plan Land_U_.s_e. pe,_.s_ig..nation__._~s EXHIBIT A-2 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN THE SPECIFIC PLAN OVERLAY EXHIBIT FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN R:XS PXRoripaugh Ranch SP~new~C Staff Report 10-16-02~Resos and oral (KIp) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 67 SPECIFIC pi AN OVERI.AY Approved Specific Plnn Ar~as PA 33 A and B -'he City of TEMECULA General Plan Program' FIOURE 2-5 EXHIBIT A-3 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION MAP FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN R:XS PW, oripaugh Ranch SPknewXPC Staff Report 10-164)2~Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 68 Proposed General Plan Circulation Ele_rn_.e..n.t.,A_,m_e._ndme.._.._Qnt ' BI: EXHIBIT A-4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN R:~S P~Rofipaugh Ranch S P~new~°C Staff Report 10-16-02~Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 69 EXHIBIT A-4 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL Planning Application No. PA94-0075 (Specific Plan) - Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan No. 11 Project Description: A Specific Plan for 804.7 acres to provide zoning and development standards for the development of 2,015 dwelling units within several gated communities, 110,000 square feet of neighborhood commemial retail space, a 12 acre elementary school site and a 20 acre middle school site, two public parks sites including a 19.7 acre Sports Park with lighted playing fields and a 4.8 acre neighborhood park with passive uses, three private recreation facilities, private and public trails and paseos, a fire station site, and 202.7 acres of natural open space to be preserved as permanent habitat, related flood control improvements to Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 957-130-001 and 002, 957-340-001,003, 007, 008, AND 958-260- 001 and 002 Approval Date: October 30, 2002 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Nine Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($928.00) which includes the Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21151 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the Applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements Approval of this Specific Plan is contingent upon and shall not become effective nor shall it vest until a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zone Change are approved by the City Council, and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or any other environmental review under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are certified by the City Council. R:XS P~Roripaugh Ranch S P~new~C Staff Reporl 10-16-02\Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 70 Within thirty (30) days of approval of the Specific Plan, the applicant shall submit a final copy reflecting all the changes necessary to make the document consistent with City Council's final action including the Errata Sheet dated 10-30-02 included in the October 30, 2002 Planning Commission Report and curb Separated sidewalks on local streets. The final Specific Plan shall be reviewed for consistency and approved by the Planning Director. Grading permits shall not be issued until all changes to the Specific Plan document are approved by the Planning Director. (Amended by the Planning Commission on 10-30-02) The approval granted by this Resolution shall become effective upon the Effective Date of the Development Agreement, as the term Effective Date is defined in the Development Agreement adopted concurrently with this Resolution. In addition to the foregoing, in the event a Development Agreement is entered into that supercedes or alters these conditions of approval and the applicant causes a default or terminates by conduct the Development Agreement, then the City shall immediately consider the revocation of the approval granted by this Resolution. The Specific Plan shall not be effective for the portion of the site not within the City Limits until the annexation of the property is completed or by other means as approved by the City Attorney. The following shall be completed prior to the City Council Hearing: Only four lots, of approximately 1.8 acre each, shall be provided along the eastern property line within PA 19 adjacent to parcels with Assessor's Parcel numbers 943-160-018, 943-160-017, 943-150-021, and 943-150-020. Only five lots, of approximately 1.3 acre each, shall be provided along the southern property line within PA 20 adjacent to parcels with Assessor's Parcel numbers 943-050-007, 943-050-018, and approximately 300' easterly portion of 943-050-009. The southeast corner of PA 20 and easterly and southeasterly corner of PA 21 shall be redesigned to reduce number of lots by 2 and 1, respectively, as shown on the attached Exhibit A, B, C, D, and E. Planning Area 33A and B shall have minimum 1 acre lots along the western boundary and minimum 1/2 acre lots everywhere else. The Design Guidelines for all Planning Areas needs to include language that the street scene for all these areas to include a reasonable mix of single-story units. Add Section 5.4 to the Specific Plan consistent with The Albert Group proposal for submittal requirements, Attached as Exhibit F. The property line fence along the south side of PA 7A shall be a 5' 6" to 6' high three-rail horse fence with wire mesh. (Added by the Planning Commission on 10-30-02) All local streets shall have curb-separated sidewalks. (Added by the Planning Commission on 10-30-02) R:~S PXRoripaugh Ranch SP~new~PC Staff Report 10-16-02\Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc EXHIBIT A-5 PROPOSED RORIPAUGH SPECIFIC PLAN DOCUMENTS (VOLUME I AND II, PROVIDED UNDER SEPARATE COVER) R:\S PXRorlpaugh Ranch SPXnew~r~C Staff Report 10-16-02~Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 72 Proposed Land Use Plan EXHIBIT B (For Attachment No. 2) CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE FOR AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ADOPTING THE ZONING STANDARDS, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND PRE- ZONING THE VALLEY NEIGHBORHOOD AS SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN R:XS PXRoripaugh Ranch SP~ewWC Staff Report lO-16-02W, esos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 73 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 94- 0075 (DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT) AMENDING SECTION 17.16.070 TO INCLUDE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 11, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, ADOPTING THE DEVELOPMETN AND ZONING STANDARDS, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CiTY OF TEMECULA, AND PRE-ZONING THE VALLEY NEIGHBORHOOD AS SPECIFIC PLAN ON PARCELS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 804.7 ACRES LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD, AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 957-130-001 and 002, 957-340-001, 003, 007, 008, AND 958-260-001 and 002 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Add the following to the end of the list contained in Section 17.16.070 of the Temecula Municipal Code: "SP-11 Roripaugh Ranch SP-13 Harveston" Section 2. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby adopts Chapter 5 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Development Standards as an uncodified ordinance. Section 3. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in at least three public places in the City. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and mitigation monitoring reporting program is consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that it accurately addresses the impacts associated with the adoption of these two Ordinances implementing the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Section 5. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. R:~S PhRoripaugh Ranch SPXnewWC Staff Report 10-16-02hResos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 74 Section 8. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. Section 9. of Temecula this PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City day of 2002. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2002-.__ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of 2002, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of ,2002 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:~S PxRorlpaugh Ranch SP~new~PC Staff Report 10-16-02~Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 75 EXHIBIT A FOR ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED ZONING MAP CHAPTER 5 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS sPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT The zoning for the Specific Plan area is Specific Plan Oveday. This section of the Specific Plan establishes zoning districts and land use regulations and standards that will control land use and development in the land uses identified for the Specific Plan area. These regulations emend and supersede the regulations of the Temecula Development Code. Where standards and regulations are not specified in this Specific Plan, the requirements of the Temecula Development Code shall provide the regulatory authority. This section also identifies the procedures to be used to review site plans for development projects proposed within the Specific Plan area. Special standards for residential development are also included here. The Site Planning and Architectural Design Guidelines in Section 4.0 are Intended to be used in conjunction with the zoning and development standards stated here. The following standards will serve as the pdmary mechanism for implementation of the land uses for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. These regulations provide an appropriate amount of flexibilityto anticipate future needs and to achieve compatibility between land uses. Principal land uses for the Specific Plan shall be as follows: Residential Land Uses: · Low Density (L) Single-Family Detached: (PA 10, 19, 20, 21, 33A and 33B) · Low Medium (LM) Density Single-Family Detached: (PA 1A-4B, 16 - 18) · Medium (M1) Density Single-Family Detached: (PA 23 and 24) · Medium (M2) Density Single-Family Detached and Attached clustered: (PA 12, 14, 15, 22 and 31) 2. Commercial: · Neighborhood Commerciah (PA 11) Parks and Open Space: · Private Recreation Centers (PA 5, 30) · Private Mini-Park (PA lB) · Parks (PA 6, 27) · Open Space · Habitat (OS1): (PA 8, 9A, 9B, and 13) · Flood Control (OS2): (PA 7B, 7C, 25, 26, and portions of 14 and 27) · Landscape Slope (OS3): (PA 7A and portion of 6) 4. Elementary and Middle School: (PA: 28 and 29) 5. Fire Station: (PA 32) Rodpau~h Ranch Specific Plml 5-1 C.'~DOCUM ENTS AND S ETTI NG SUdAASEHS~.OCAL Sb It iN GS\TEMI~S PSECTS CC DOCUM ENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS This section of the development regulations states the general rules that must be observed by all development projects in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. These regulations apply to all planning areas within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, unless otherwise specified. 1. Roripaugh Ranch Site Planning and Architectural Design Guidelines All development within the Rorlpaugh Ranch Specific Plan area is subject to the policy provisions of the Site Planntng (Section 4.0) 8nd Architectural Design Guidelines (Section 4.0) adopted by ordinance of the Temecula City Council, The Design Guidelines in conjunction with the development standards contained in this Specific Plan and those of the Temecula Development Code shall regulate development within the Specific Plan area. The Design Guidelines will be administered through the City of Temecula Planning Department, All development within the Roripeugh Ranch Specific Plan area shall be subject to the Development Standards in this section of the Specific Plan. 2o Code Compliance All construction and development within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area shall comply with applicable provisions of the Specific Plan, the Uniform Building Code and the various related mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire cedes, water ordinance, grading and excavation codes and subdivision codes, in effect in the City of Temecula at the time grading/building permits are obtained. 3. Setback Requirements The setback requirements ara as specified within the standards identified in the plan for each zoning district. If not otherwise specified, all setbacks shall be determined as the perpendicular distance from the existing or planned street right-of-way line or property line, to the foundation point ot the closest structure. 4. Exceptions If specific development standards have not been established or if an issue, condition or situation arises or occurs that is not clearly understandabla in the Specific Plan, then those regulations and standards of the City of Temeeula Development Code that ara applicable for the most similar use, condition or situation shall apply as determined by the Community Development Director. 5. Enforcement Enfomement of the provisions herein shall be in the manner specitied in the Temecula Municipal Code for zoning enforcement. 6. Unspecified Uses Whenever a use has not specifically been listed as being a permitted use in a particular zone classification within the Specific Plan, it shall be the duty of the Planning Director to determine if said use is: (1) consistent with the intent of the zone; and (2) compatible with other listed permitted uses. Any person aggrieved by the decision may appeal to the Planning Commission. Rodpaugh Ranch Spec~fl(: Plan 5-2 C:~DOCUMENTS AND SETTJN GS'ddAAS EH S~.OCAL SETTINGS\TEMImSPSECT5CCDOCU MENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan provides a mix of diverse housing products, including five different housing types that fall within three of the City's General Plan residenti;~l designations: Temecula General Plan Specific Plan Desl~lnatlon Residential Deslqnatlon L (20,000 sq. ft.) Single-Family (1-2 du/ac) LM (5,000 and 6,000) Single-Family (2-5 du/ac) (Min. 5,000 sf lot size) M1 and M2 (4,000 and NA) Single-Family (7-12 du/ac) Min. (standard) 4,000 sf lot size Min. (clustered) 3,000 sf lot size for detached Low Density Residential Single-Family (.5-2 du/ac) Low Modlum Density Residential Single-Family (3-6 du/ac) Medium Density Residential Single-Family (7-12 du/ac) Rmt~augh Ranch Sl~c~flo Plan 5-3 C:~DOCUMENT$ AND $ETTING SVdAASEH S~.OCAL SE,] iN G S\TEM P~SPS ECTSCC DOCUMENT,O OC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.1 DESCRIPTION OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 10, 19, 20, 21, 33A AND 33B The Low Density Residential (L) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single- family detached homes on large lots with a unique character of development. Typical lot sizes in the L zoning district will be a minimum of 20,000 square feet with 1 acre minimum lots along the exterior perimeter of Planning Areas 19, 20, 21, and 33A. Private equestrian use will only be allowed on lots one acre or larger adjacent to Ihe multi-use trail in Planning Areas 19, 20, 21. Planning Ama 33B shall not be developed as a part of Roripaugh Ranch. This planning area shall eventually be combined with the adjacent residential areas to the north. LOW MEDIUM DENSITY (LM) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. lA, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 16, 17 and 18 The Low Medium (LM) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single-family homes on lots of 5,000 square feet to 6,000 square feet. Planning Areas 1,2, 3, 4A, 4B, and 16 shall have a minimum lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. Planning Areas 17 and 18 shall have a minimum lot size of 6,000 sq. fl. MEDIUM DENSrFY - STANDARD (M1) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 23 AND 24 The Medium (M) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single-family homes on lots 4,000 minimum square feet. MEDIUM DENSITY - CLUSTERED (M2) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 12, 14, 15, 22 AND 31 The Medium (M) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of clustered single-family development on minimum lot sizes of 3,000 sq. ff. Rorlpaul]h Ranch Specific Plan 5-4 C:'*DOCUMEI~rFS AND SETTINGS~XIAASEHS~.OCAL SEI'i'INGS~TEMP~SPSECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.2 USE REGULATIONS The list ol land uses in the following table shall be permitted in one or more of the residential zoning districts as indicated in the columns corresponding to each residential zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated with a "-~, the use is prohibited within the zone. Where indicated with a letter 'C", the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. Table 6.1 Schedule of Permitted Usee - Residential Districts Descrlptton of Ua, I L LM M1 I M2 Single-family detached P P P Single-family attached P Single-family zero lot line P P Single-family attached greater than two units Multiple family Manufactured homes P P P P Mobilehome park Facilities for the menially disordered, handicapped, or dependent or P P P P neglected children (aix or fewer) Facilities for the mentally disordered, handicapped, or dependent or neglected children (seven to twelve) Alcoholism or drag abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or fewer) P P P P Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (seven or more) Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P P P P Residential care facilities for the elderty (seven or more) Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities Secondary dwelting units as defined by City Development Code P P Granny Flat P P Family day care homes-small (four or fewer) P P P P Family day care homes-large~ C C Day care centers C C Bed and breakfast establishments Emergency shelters Transitional housing Nonresidential Roffpaugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-5 C:~OCUMENTS AND SETTINGS~NAASEHSU.OCAL SETTINGS~TEMP~SPSECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIRC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Ag~cultumVopen specs uses Religious institutionss C C C C Utility fecilitles C C C C Educational institutions Public libraries Public museums and a~l galleries (not for profit) Kennels and catteries Non commercial keeping of horses P4 Temporary real estate tract offices P P P P Rec~'eational Vehicle Storage Yards Perking for commercial uses Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls Convalescent facilities Golf Courses Home occupations P P P P Construction Trailerss P P P P 1. A CUP processed for large family day cern homes is subject to Health and Safety C, ode Se~:tion 1597.46(a}(3). In accordance therewith~ notice of the application being flied shaft be mailed to sunounding pmpa~y ownem within one hundred feet or+ly and the notice shall In0icare that unless a request for a beadng Is made by such sun'ound]ng property owner or other "affected pemon', the CUP will Issue wiffdn twenty days of the notice. If a hearing [s requeal~d, the planning department shall schedule such hesdng within thirty days of the request and the hesring shall be held within thirty days of being scheduled. 2. Allowed only within a single-family residence. 3. The Planning Director shall have the discretion to waive submitthJ ct an Admlnistretive Development Plan if it is determined thai the conslmc~on bailer will not have an adveme impact on adjacent msidenees or businesses. 4. The keeping of horses shall only be permitted In INannlng Areas 19, 20 and 21 on lots abutting the multi-ese trail. No more than two (2) homes and one (1) offspring up to six (6) months of age may be kepi on each one acre IoL NI horses tihail be kept ica stall/coral (12' x 12' lo; each home) located a minimum distance of fifty (50) lest from neighboring dwellings, ten (10) feet from the main dwelling on the lot and ten (10) feet from the side or rear pmparty line. s. Religious institutions shall not be permittecl in Planning Areas lA. 2, 3, 4A and 4B Rodp~u~h Ranch Spe~ Plan 5-6 C:~DOCUMENTS AND $ ETTIN GS~NAAS EHS~LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMP~S PSECTSCCDOCUMENT. DOC November, 2002 5.3.3 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS In the Low (L), Low Medium (LM) and Medium (M) Zones are as follows: Table 5-2 Development Standards - Residential Districts Residential Development L LM LM M1 M2 Standards 20,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 (Minimum Lot Size In Feet) Planning Area 10, 19, 20, lA, 2, 3, 17 and 18 23 end 24 12, 14, 15, 22 21, 33A 4A, 4B and 31 and 33B and 16 Minimum gross lot area 20,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 3,000 (square feet) 1 acre* -* Lots In PA 19, 20 and 21 that abut eastern and southern proper~y boundary shall be a minimum of 1 acre. Thirty (30) toot fuel modification zone shell not be included in lot area. Dwelling units per net acre 1,2 du/ac 5.2 duJac 4.0 du/an 6.1 du/ac 10.1 du/as Minimum lot frontage st 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 It. 25 ft. NA front property line Minimum lot frontage for a 25 ft. 20 ft. 20 fl, 20 ft. NA flag lot at front propelly line Minimum width at required 50 It. 40 fi, 40 ff. 40 ft. NA front yard setback area Minimum lot width 60 It.* 40 ff. 40 It. 40 It. 40 ff. · For both 20,000 sq. ft. lots and 1 acre lots shall be substantially the same. Minimum lot depth 90 ft. 80 It. 80 fl, 80 fl. NA Minimum front yard setback 25ft. 10fi 10ff. 10ft, 10ft. - Front entry garages 18 ft. 18 It. 18 ft. 18 It. 18 ft. - Side entry garages 10 ft, 10 It. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ff. - Lots abutting Murriets Hot Springs between Pourroy Rd. and the MWD easement may be reduced by three (3) feet. Minimum oorner side yard 15 lt. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. setback Setbacks for lots abutting Murders Hot Springs between Pourroy Rd. and the MWD easement may be reduced by three (3) feet. *Minimum interior side yard 10 ft. 5 It. S ft. 5 ft. S fi. setback Rodpaugh Ranch Specific Fflan 5-7 C:~DOCU MENTS AND S ETTIN G S'~NAAS E HS~OCAL SETTI N GI~TEM P~SPS ECTSC CDQCU M ENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Table 5-2 Development Standarda. Residential Districts Residential Development L LM LM M (Slandard) M Standards 20,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 (Clustered) (Minimum Lot 81ze In Feet) Minimum rear yard estback 20ft. 20fl. 20ft. 15ft. 15ft. - Setbacks for lots abutIJng 25 ft. Planning Area 7A along the southern property line shell have a 25' minimum rear yard setback. - Lots abutting Multi-uce trail in 50 ft. PA 19, 20 and 21. - Setbacks for lots abutting Murrieta Hot Springs between Pounoy Rd. and the IVlWD easement may be reduced by staff by three (3) feet. Planning Area 10, 19, 20, 1, 2, 3, 17 and 18 23 end 24 12, 14, 15, 22 21, 33A 4A, 4B and 31 and 33B and 16 Maximum height 2 2 stories, 2 2 2 ~ 2 ½ 2 35 feet stories, 35 eto~ies, 35 slories, 35 stories, 35 feet feet feet feet Ma)dmum percentage of lot 50% 60% 60% 60% coverage Minimum Garage Size 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' (interior space) · Rrepracea may project not more than two (2) feet inlo the side yard setback provided the width of the fireplace does not exceed eight (8) feet In wldlh. Rortpaugh Ranch S~ectfic Plan 5-8 C:~DOCU MENTS AND SETTING S~IAASEHS~LOCAL $= ~ ~ ;NG S~TEMP~SPSECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.4 5.4.1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (PLANNING AREA 11) DESCRIPTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL Neighborhood Comrnereial (Planning Area No. 11), will include a vadety of ditferent types of land uses. Uses within this planning area include smaller-scaJe business activities which generally provide retail and/or convenlance services for residents within Rodpaugh Ranch. The tollowing are site planning guidallnes relating to Planning Area No. 11. 5.4.2 USE REGULATIONS The list of land uses in the following table shall be parroted in the neighborhood commercial zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated with a '-', the use is prohibited within the zone. Where indicatad with a letter "C', the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. Table 5,3 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Neighborhood Commercial Center (PA-11) Description of Use I NC A Adult business subject to Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code Aercblcs/dance/gymnaallcs/jazzercise/madlal aris studios (less than 5,000 8q, It. P Aerobics/dance/gymnaalic..~azzercise/martial ads studios (greater than 5,000 sq, lt, P Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities Alcohol and drug treatment (oulpatiant) Alcoholic beverage sales C Ambulance sewices Animal hospital/shelter Antique restoration Antique sales (Less than 5,000 sq. ft.) P Apparel and acoessoty shops P Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P Arcades (pinball and video games) Art supply stores P Auction houses Auditoriums and conference facilities C Automobile dealers (new and used) Automobile sales (brokerage)- showroom only (new and used)-no outdoor display Automobile repair sewicas Automobile rental Rodpaul~h Ranch Speci~ Plan 5-9 C:~OCUMENTS AND S ETTI NG S~iAAS EHS%OCAL SETTING S~,TEM F~SPS ECTSCCDOCU M ENT.D OC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Automobile painting and body shop Automobile service stations with alcoholic sales Automotive service stations (not selling beer and/or wine) with or without an automated P car wash Automobile pads-salsa C Automobile oil change/lube services with no major repair C B Bakery goods distribution Bakery retail P Bakery Wholesale Banks and financial institutions P Barber and beauty shops P Bad and breakfast Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) P Billiard parlor/poolhall Binding of books and similar publications BJood bank P Blueprint and duplicating and copy services P Bookstores P Building mstadais sales (with the extedor storage/salsa areas greater than 50 percent of total saJes area) Building materials sales (with the extedor storage/sales areas greater than 50 percent of total sales area) Butcher shop P C Cabinet shop Cabinet shops under 20,000 sq, ft.- no outdoor storage Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) P Candy/confectionery sales P Car wash, full san, ics/salf service Carpet and rug cleaning Catering services P ClolhJng sales P Coins, pumhase and sales P Rodpaugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-10 C:~)OCUMENTS AND SETTI NGS~N AASEHSU. OCAL St= //iNGS~TE MI:~SPS ECTSCC DOCU MENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Communications and microwave Jnstellations" Communications equipment saiss~ C Community care facilities C Computer sales and services P Congregate care housing for the elderty :~ C Construction equipment sales, san/ices or rental Contractor's equipment, sales, sen/ice or rental Convenience market Costume rentals P Crematoriums Cutlery P D Data processing equipment and systems Day care centers P Delicatessen P Discount/department store P Distribution fscility Drug store/pharmacy P Dry cleaners P Dry oleanlng plant E Emergency shelter Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor st?rage) P Equipment sales end renta~ (outdoor storage) F Feed and grain sales Financial, insurance, real estate offices P Fire and police stations P Floor cove~ing sales P Florist shop P Food processing Fortunetelling, spiritualism, or similar activity P Freight terminals Ro~paugh Ranch Specific P~n 5-11 C:',DOCUMENTG AND SETTINGS'~IAAS EH b*~.OC AL SETTINGS~TEMF~S PSECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Fuel storage and distribution Funeral parlom, mortua~ Furniture sales (Less Ihan 10,000 sq. It.) P Fumituro transfer and storage G Garden supplies and equipment sales and sauce Gas distribution, meter and control station General memhandiss/mtail stores less than 10,000 sq. fl. P Glass and mirrom, retail sales P Government offices P Grocery store, retail P Grocery store, wholosale Guns and firearm sales H Hardware stores P Health and exemise club P Health I'ood store P Health care facility P Heliport Hobby supply shop P Home and business maintenance service Hospitals Hotels/motals Ice cream pador P Impound yard Interior decorating san/ice P Junk or salvage yard K Kennel Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-12 C:~DOCUMENTS AND St= I IINGS~NAASEHS~LOCAL SETTINGS~TEMP~PSECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE L Laboratories, film, medlcaJ, reseamh or testing centers Laundromat P Laundry service (commemial) Libraries, museums, and galleries (private) C Uquid petroleum, sales and distribution Liquor stores C Uthographic ssmice Locksmith P M Machine shop Machinery storage yard Mail order business P Manufacturing o! products similar to, but not limited to the following: Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods, within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry, furniture, art objects. clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes which do nor involve frequent truck traffic. Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck sen, ices and temninals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or semi-refined products requiting further procnss[ng and msnufacturing, and outside storage. Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage Massage 3 p Medical equipment ssJes/rental P Membership clubs, organizations, lodges . C Mini-storage or mini-warehouse faclllites Mobilehome sales and services Motion picture studio Motorcycle sales end service Movie theaters C Musical and recording studio N Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club Rodpaugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-13 C:'~DOCUMENTS AND $ ETI'ING b~NAASEHS~OCAL SETTINGS~TEMF~SPSECT5CCDOCUMENT.DOC November. 2002 Nurseries (retail) Nursing homes/convalescent homes SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE lc 0 Office equipment supplies, sales/services P Offices, administrative or corporate headquartem with greater than 50,000 sq. Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. It., but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, veterlnarien, chirogmctlc, architectural, engineering, real estate, P Pslnt end wallpaper stores Parcel dalive~y services Parking lots and parking structures C Pawnshop Personal service shops p Pest control services Pet grooming/pet shop P Photographic studio P Plumbing supply yard (enctosed or unenclosed) Postal distribution Postal services P Printing and publishing (newspapem, periodicals, books, alo.,) Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) Reserved R Radio and broadcasting studios, offices RadioAelevision transmitter Recreational vehicle parks Recreational vehicle sales Recreational vehicte, tmiter, and boat storage within an enctosed building Recycling coitection facilities P Rori~augh Ranch Specific Plan 5-14 C:tDOCUMENTS AND SET'FIN GS'~'~IAAS EH S~.OCAL SETTING S~TEM P~S PS ECT5CCDOCUME NT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Recycling prooesclng facilities Religious institution, without a daycere or private school C Religious institution, with a private school C Religious institution, with a daycsre C C Restaurant, drtve-lr~ast food Restaurants and other eating establishments P Restaurants with lounge or live enterteinmant C Rooming and boarding houses $ Scale, public Schools, business and professional C Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12) C Scientific research and development offices and leboratoriss Solid waste disposal facility Sports and recreational facilities C Swap meet, entirely inside a permanent building Swap meet, outdoor Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales P T Tailor shop Taxi or limousine service Tire sales Tobacco shop P Tool and die casting Trensler, moving and storage Transportation terrelnals and stations C Truck sales/rentals/service TV/VCR repair P U Upholstery shop I ROrlrn~U?,h Ranch Specifl~ Plan 5-15 C.'~DOCU MENTS AND SETTIN GS'~IAAS EH S~.OCAL SET'rlNGS\TEM P~SPSECTSGCOOCUM ENT. DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE V Vending machine sales and services W W arehouslng/dlstdbution Watch repair P Wedding chapels Welding shop Welding supply and service (enclosed) Y Reserved Z Reserved 1. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 17.40 of the City of Temecula Development Code 2. Subjecl to the pmvicdons oo~tained in Sec~on 17.ce.050.H of the City of Temecula Development Code 3. Subjecl to the provisions contained [n Sec6on 5,22 o! the City of Temecula Municipal Cede Rodrn~L!n.h Ranch Specific Plan 5-16 C:~DOCUMENTS AND SETFINGSV, dAASEHS~OCAL SET'rlNGS\TEMP~SPSECTSCCDOCUMENT,DOC November, 2002 5.4.3 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following standards of development shall apply in the Neighborhood Commercial: Table ~ Development Standerda- Neighborhood Commercial (Commercial Uses - PA 11) Minimum gross area for site 2 acres for common lot centers, 30,000 square feet I'or single lots Target floor area ratio .3 Maximum floor area ralJo with intensity bonus as per Section .50 17.08.050 Front yard adjacent to street: - Butteffiald Stage Road/Murrtsta Hot Springs Read 20 feet; structure & parking - "A" and "B" Slrest 20 feet, structure & perking Yard adjacent to residentially zoned properly 25 feet, structure & parking Accessory structure side/rear yard setback 10 feet Minimum building separation: - One story: 10 feet - Two stories: 15 feet - Three stodes or more: 20 feet Maximum building height 50 feet Maximum percent of lot coverage 30% Minimum required landscaped open space 20% Fence, wall or hedge screening outdoor storage maximum height 6 feet Minimum building setback separation: - Two stories: 15 feet - Three stories or more: 20 feet Rorip~ugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-17 C:~DOCU MENT$ AND St:i ~ iNGS~NAASEH~LOCAL SETTI N GS~TEM P'~S PS ECTSCCD OCU M ENT.D OC November', 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.5 5.5.1 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE (Planning Arsea Nos, lB, 5, 6, 7A, 7B, 7C, 8, 9A, 9B, 13, 27, 25, 26 and 30) DESCRIPTION OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Parks (P) and Open Space (OS) zoning district is intended to promote a wide range of public and pdvate recreational uses in the community. These uses include community facilities, golf courses, health clubs, public perks and recreation areas, spods parka, or other outdoor athletic facilities and similar outdoor commercial recreational uses. 5.5.2 USE REGULATIONS The list of land uses In the fallowing labia shall be permitted in one or more of the park and open space zoning district as indicated in the columns corresponding to each zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use. Where Indicated with a ?, the uae is prohibited within the zone. Where indicated with a letter %"', the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permil. Table 5.5 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Parka and Recreational Uses p P OS~ 0,% 0,% Schedule o~ Uses (Private) (Public) lB, 5 Planning Area and 30 6 and 27 8, 9A, 7B, 7C, Po~cns 9B, and 25 and of 6 and 13, 26 7A Agricultural Uses Athletic Field P P Bicycle paths P P P P Campground Caretakers quarters Cemeteries, mausoleums and related uses Game courls, badminton, tennis, racquetball P P Golf ddvlng range not part of a golf course Golf course and clubhouse P P Government and public utility facilities C C P P Gymnasium p p Microwave antenna/towert Nature canters/exhibits Nurseries P P Group Picnic Facilities Pdvate parks and recrealion facilities p p p p Parking areas P P Rottpau~q Ranch Specific= Plan 5-t8 C.'~DOCUMENTS AND SETTIN GSU~IAASEH $~LOCAL S ETTINGS\TEMP~SPSECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Public perks end recreational facilities P P P P Recrealional vehicle park Riding stable, pub[Jo or private Shooting galleries, ranges, archery courses Single-family dwellings Tree Farms 1. See Zoning Appendix of Development Code 17.40 for antenna information. Rortpaugh Ranch $1~ctfic Plan 5-19 C:'OOCUMENTS AND SETTING S~IAAS E HS%OCAL SETFINGS\TEMP~SPSECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.6.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS in the Parks and Open Space districts development standards are as follows: Table 5-6 Development Standards - Parka sad Open Space Standards Development Standards I P t OS Planning Area lB, 5, 6, 27 and 7A, 7B, 70, 8, 31 9A, 9B, 13, 25 and 26 Minimum lot size 10,000 sq. ft. Maximum lot coverage 25% Maximum height 35 fcet~ Floor area ratio .1 Setback from parking structure 25 feet Setback from parking structure 25 feet Minimum open space/landscaping 75% 100% 1. Exc{ude$ light poles and communlcatio~ factl~es. Ro~ipau~h Ranch Specific Plan · ~-20 C:~DOCUMENT$ AND S b/lin GS~JflAAS E H~I. OCAL SETTING S~TE M P~SPS ECTSCC DOCU ME NT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.6 PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICTS (PLANNING AREAS 28 AND 29) 5.6.1 DESCRIPTION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT AND PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT The purpose of this district is to facilitate the construction of an Elementary School site and Middle School site. Planning Area 28 will be developed as a Middle School site and Planning Area 30 will be developed as an Elementary School site. 5.6.2 USE REGULATIONS Planning Areas 28 and 29 shall only be designated to be used as a Middle School site and an Elementary School site, respectively. ROrl~nn~,~h Flat,ch Specific P~arl 5-21 C:!DOCUMENTS AND SETTI NGS~N AASEH S~OCAL S= ~ ~ ~NGS~TEMP~SPSECTSC_,CDOCUMENT.DOC November. 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.7 PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL. (PLANNING AREA 32) 5.7.1 DESCRIPTION OF PUBUC INSTITUTIONAL (FIRE STATION) The purpose of this district is to facilitate construction of public and quasi-public uses in approp~ata areas of the city. Planning Area 31 will be developed as a fire station on a 1.5 acre site. 5.7.2 USE REGULATIONS Planning Area 31 shall only be designated as a Fire Station. Rori~)augh Ranch Specific Plan 5-22 CN)OCU MENT$ AND S= ~ ~ ~NG b-'~,~AS EHS~I. OCA L S ETTIN G S~TE MFAS PS ECTSCCDOCU M ENT.D OC November, 2OO-z SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.8 PARKING REQUIREMENTS Refer to Chapter 17.24 of the City Development Code for parking requirements. Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan 5-23 C.~DOCUMENT8 AND SETTIN GS~IAASEH 8~.OCAL SETTING $\TEMP~S PSECT5 CC D OCU M ENT.DOC November, 2002 EXHIBIT B FOR ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED ZONING MAP ~s¥ us~, LLC FIGURE 1-2 LA~E S~3NNER ~ CiTY LIMITS VL Vmy Low Residential (0.4-2.0 du/ac) tM Low Medium Residenlial (L2-14du/ac) SP Spedfic F~an (RoAoaugh Ranch Panhan~e) OS Open Space ~ PROJECT SITIE COUNTY SOUTHWEST AREA PLAN DESIGNATION Rural Resldenltal (<02. du/ac) A AQrlcultum SP Spe~fic Plan (Rancho Bel~ Vista) Vt. Very Low Dendty (0.4-2.0 alu/ac) L Low Der~ty (2.0-5.0 alu/ac) M Medium De~ (5.0-8.0 du/ac) BP Business Park CC Community Center OS-R Open Space- Recreation RC Relza'l Commercial PF Public Facilities r o_.~. ,, · ~,,~ Roripau Rand] EXHIBIT C FOR ATTACHMENT 3 PREZONING THE VALLEY NEIGHBORHOOD AS SPECIFIC PLAN ,~mmY us~ u.c FIGURE 1-2 J ' i I ~m CITY LIMITS V L verf Low Re;;lde~]al (0.4-2.0 du/ac) IJ~ Lmv Medium Resld~lat (I.2-t,ldu/ac) PI: Public Facflilies SP Specific Plan (Rodpaugh Rmtch Panhandle) OS Open 8pace COUNTY SOUTH~ST AREA I:~ DESIGNATION r o..~ ,o .,,,~ Roripaugt~_fc,~ a_ach EXHIBIT C (For Attachment No. 2) CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT R:~ PXRoripaugh Ranch SPXnewWC Staff Report 10* 16-02W, esos and oM (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 77 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ASHBY USA, LLC, (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 99-0299)" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and A. Ashby USA, LLC ("Owner") filed Planning Application No PA99-0298 (General Plan Amendment), PA 94-0073 (Annexation), PA94-0075 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment and Specific Plan Zoning Standards), PA 94-0076 (Environmental Impact Report), PA 94-0075 (Change of Zone), PA99-0299 (Development Agreement) PA01-0253 (Tentative Tract Map 29661 ), PA01-0230 (Tentative Tract Map 29353), (the "Application") in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code for land use approvals for a 804.7 acre planned community located Northeast of the City near the future intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road, ("Project"). development development development development housing and Government Code Section 65864 authorizes the City to enter into binding agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the of such property in order to, among other matters: ensure high quality in accordance with comprehensive plans; provide certainty in the approval of projects so as to avoid the waste of resources and the escalation in the cost of other development to the consumer; provide assurance to the applicants for development projects that they may proceed with their projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations and subject to conditions of approval, in order to strengthen the public planning process and encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the private and public economic costs of development; and provide for economic assistance to Owner for the entitlements authorizing development related improvements. C. On October 16, 2002 October 30, 2002 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, the proposed Development Agreement(s) and the other land use applications for the Project at which time all persons interested in the Draft EIR, proposed Development Agreement and the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Development Agreement and the Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002- __ recommending to the City Council that the Development Agreement be approved, subject to certain recommended conditions. E. On ,2002 the City Council of the City of Temecula held duly noticed public hearings on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, proposed Development Agreement(s) and the other land use applications for the Project at which time all persons interested in the proposed Development Agreement and the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. R:~S PXRofipaugh Ranch SP~new~PC Staff Report 10-16-02~Resos and ord (E/P) - 10-30-02 approved by PC,doc 78 F. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the proposed Final EIR, Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Code Amendment, Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance, Tentative Tract Maps (Level A and B), and Development Agreement, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2002- , entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula Certifying the Environmental Impact Report Prepared for the Rodpaugh Ranch Specific Plan No. 11 (Planning Application No. 94- 0076) and Related Actions, and Adoption of the Environmental Findings Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in Connection Therewith." Section 2. declares that: The City Council of the City of Temecula further finds, determines and A. In consideration of the substantial public improvements and benefits to be provided by Owner and the Project, in further consideration of the implementation of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and in order to strengthen the public financing and planning process and reduce the economic costs of development, by the Development Agreement, the City intends to give Owner assurance that Owner can proceed with the development of the Project for the Term of the Development Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement and in accordance with the City's General Plan, ordinances, policies, rules and regulations existing as set forth in the Development Agreement. In reliance on the City's covenants in the Development Agreement concerning the development of the Property, Owner has and will in the future incur substantial costs in site preparation and the construction and installation of major infrastructure and facilities in order to make the Project feasible. B. The Development Agreement and the Existing Project Approvals, as defined in the Development Agreement, implement the goals and policies of the City's General Plan, and the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, provide balanced and diversified land uses, and impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development and usage in order to maintain the overall quality of life and the environment within the City. C. The City has engaged in extensive studies and review of the potential impacts of the Project as well as the various potential benefits to the City by the development of the Project and concluded that the Project is in the best interests of and is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the City. D. The Development Agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan, and each Element thereof, and the City's Growth Management Action Plan, and constitutes a present valid exercise of the City's police power. E. The Development Agreement is being entered into pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of Government Code Section 65867. F. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves certain agreement entitled "Development Agreement by and Between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC." and authorizes the Mayor to execute said agreement attached hereto as Attachment C-1. R:~S PXRofipaugh Ranch SP~newXPC Staff Report 10-16-02~Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 79 Section 4. if any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ,2002. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 02- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of ,2002, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of ,2002 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: OOUNOILMEMBERS: SUSAN JONES, CMC CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney R:~S PXRoripaugh Ranch SP~rlew~PC Staff Report 10-16-02~Resos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 80 ATTACHMENT C-1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT R:~S PXRodpaugh Ranch SPXnewWC Staff Report 10-16-02W. esos and ord (EJP) - 10-30-02 approved by PC.doc 81 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT By and Between THE CITY OF TEMECULA, City, and ASHBY USA, LLC Owner. R:~D ALRorioaueh DA~,DA 11-19-02 from Curley. DOCP.:~-D DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND PREANNEXATION AGREEMENT THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND PREANNEXATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into as of the day of , 2002 ("Agreement Date"), by and between Ashby USA, LLC, a Limited Liability Corporation ("OWNER"), and the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the taws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), pursuant to the authority of Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code and Article XI, Section 2 of the California Constitution. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority contained in the Development Agreement Legislation, pursuant to Article XI, Section 2 of the California Constitution, and in consideration of the foregoing recitals of fact, all of which are expressly incorporated into this Agreement, the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows: INTENT OF THE PARTIES This Agreement is predicated upon the following facts: A. The following paragraphs refer to and utilize certain capitalized terms which are defined in this Agreement. The parties intend to refer to those definitions in conjunction with the use thereof in these Recitals. B. The Development Agreement Legislation authorizes the CITY to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property in order to, among other matters: ensure high quality development in accordance with comprehensive plans; provide certainty in the approval of development projects so as to avoid the waste of resoumes and the escalation in the cost of housing and other development to the consumer; provide assurance to the applicants for development projects that they may proceed with their projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations and subject to conditions of approval, in order to strengthen the public planning process and encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the private and public economic costs of development; assist in the financing of public improvements; protect against initiatives, moratorium (processing or development) and other actions inconsistent with the Project anticipated by this Agreement; assure reimbursement of OWNER in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and state and federal law; and provide for economic assistance to OWNER for the entitlements authorizing development related improvements. C. OWNER is the owner of certain real property (the "Propert¢'), as more particularly described in Attachment "1", including a plat graphically depicting the real property contained in Attachment "2". A portion of the property 713471.1 11/19/'2002 1 is within the current boundaries of CITY and a portion is proposed to be annexed into CITY from Riverside County. OWNER desires to develop the Property in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, the Existing Regulations and those regulations of other agencies exemising jurisdiction over the Project which are not inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement and the Existing Regulations. Owner will refrain from developing any portion of the Property in a manner inconsistent with this Agreement and the Existing Regulations regardless of which public agency has land use jurisdiction over the Property. The agreed upon Scope of Development of the Property is set forth in this Agreement expressly or by incorporation. D. OWNER has sought, and the CITY has agreed to, this Agreement in order to assist in the creation of a beneficial project and a physical environment that will conform to and complement the goals of the CITY, create a development project responsive Io community needs, facilitate efficient traffic circulation, and develop the Property in a manner beneficial to all parties. As part of the process of granting this entitlement, the City Council of the CITY has required the preparation of and has certified the Project EIR in order to identify any significant environmental effects arising from the Development and has otherwise carried out all requirements of the California Environmental Qualily Act ("CEQA") of 1970, as amended. E. The following actions were taken with respect to this Agreement and the Project: 1. On ,2002, following a duly noticed and conducted public hearing, the City Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project, this Agreement, the proposal, annexation, the General Plan amendments, the Specific Plan, and Tentative Map No. 29353 (hereafter "A Map") and 29661 (hereafter "B Map"), by adoption of its Resolution No. __ and making the findings of fact thereto; 2. On , after a duly noticed public hearing and pursuant to CEQA, the City Council certified the Project EIR and adopted the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program by adoption of its Resolution No. __ and making the findings of fact lhereto; 3. On , afler a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council approved proceeding with the annexation, the General Plan Amendments, the Specific Plan and the A Map and B Map by adoption of its Resolution No. , Ordinance No. __ and making the findings of fact thereto; 4, On the City Council introduced Ordinance No. __ execution of this Agreement and on , after a duly noticed public hearing, approving and authorizing the , the City Council aclopted 713471.1 11/19/2002 2 the Ordinance, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk of the CITY, and the findings and conditions pertaining thereto. F. The CITY has engaged in extensive studies and review of the potential impacts of the Project under the California Environmental Quality Act and all applicable Existing Regulations, as well as the various potential benefits to the CITY by the development of the Project and concluded that the Project is in the best interests of the CITY. G. In consideration of the substantial public improvements and benefits already provided and those to be provided by OWNER and the Project, as described in this Agreement, in further consideration of the benefits that will inure to the CITY in conjunction wilh the implementation of the Project and in order to slrengthen the Project's public financing and planning process and reduce the economic costs of development, by this Agreement, the CITY intends to give and by this Agreement gives, OWNER assurance that OWNER can proceed with the Development of the Project for the Term of this Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and in accordance with the Development Plan Approval(s) and the Existing Regulations. This entitlement shall be effective for that portion of the Property within the jurisdiction of CITY upon the Effective Date and shall be effective for thal portion of the Property which is to be annexed to CITY from the County of Riverside upon the Annexation Date. In reliance on the CITY's covenants in this Agreement concerning the Development of the Property, OWNER has and will in the future incur substantial indebtedness, as well as costs in planning, engineering, site preparation and the construction and installation of major infrastructure and facilities that OWNER would not incur but for the covenants of CITY provided in this Agreement. Each party agrees to act in good faith and shall reasonably cooperate with the other to cause the annexation of the County of Riverside's portion of the Property to be completed at the earliest possible opportunity. H. Pursuant to Section 65867.5 of the Development Agreement Legislation, the City Council has found and determined that: (i) this Agreement and the Development Plan Approval(s) implement the goals and policies of the CITY's General Plan and the Specific Plan, provide balanced and diversified land uses and impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development and usage in order to maintain the overall quality of life and the environment within the CITY, (ii) this Agreement and the Project are in the best interests of and not detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare of the CITY and its residents; (iii) adopting this Agreement is consistent with the CITY's General Plan and constitutes a present exemise of the CITY's police power; and (iv) this Agreement is being entered into pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Legislation. I. As to the portion of the Property presently within the jurisdiction of County of Riverside, this Agreement shall serve as the prezoning of such real 713471.1 11/19/2002 3 property, as the term is utilized in California Government Code Section 65859. This Agreement shall become effective as to the County of Riverside portion of the Project concurrently with the annexation becoming effective, without further action by either party. J. The CITY and OWNER agree that it may be beneficial to enter into operating memoranda, additional agreements or to modify this Agreement with respect to the implementation of the separate components of the Project when more information concerning the details of each component is available, and that this Agreement should expressly allow for such contemplated operating memoranda, additional agreements or modifications to this Agreement. 1. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section 1 shall, for all purposes of this Agreement, or any supplemental agreement, and any certificate, opinion or other document herein mentioned, have the meanings herein specified. All references herein to "Articles," "Sections" and other subdivisions are to the corresponding Articles, Sections or subdivisions of this Agreement, and the word 'herein," "hereof," "hereunder" and other words of similar import refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular Article, Section or subdivision hereof. "Accept" means Acceptance pursuant to the regular and ordinary procedures of the CITY. 'Acceptance" shall mean the CITY's final approval of the entirety of an On-Site or Off-Site Improvement as issued in the ordinary course of business by the CITY for the certain type of On-Site or Off-Site Improvement under review. "Annexation" means the process by which real property is lawfully brought under the jurisdiction of the City of Temecula pursuant to the procedures of the County of Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission and all applicable law. "Annexation Date" means the date upon which the Annexation is final and effective as established by the County of Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission. "Authorizing Ordinance" means Ordinance No. __ approving this Agreement. of the CITY "CITY" means the City of Temecula, a California municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of 713471.1 l 1/19/2002 4 California, and all of its officials, employees, agencies and departments and assignees or successors. "City Council" means the duly elected and constituted City Council of the CITY. "Commencement Date" shall mean the date of the issuance of lhe first building permit within the project or the one year anniversary of the Effective Date whichever occurs first. "Develop" or "Development" or "Developing" means the improvement of the Property for purposes consistent with the Development Plan, including, without limitation: subdividing, grading, the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Off-Site Improvements, the construction of structures and buildings and the installation of landscaping, all in accordance with the phasing provided for herein. "Development Agreement Legislation" means Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code as it exists on the Agreement Date. "Development Impact Fees" or "DIF" means, individually and in the aggregate, the CITY's current development impact fees as set forth in Ordinance Ne. 97-09, as amended, as set forth in the Temecula Municipal Code in Section 15.06 which are in effect on the Effective Date. "Development Plan" means the plan for Developing the Properly contained in this Agreement, the City of Temecula General Plan as amended on ,2002 and as thereafter amended in accordance with Section 3.6 hereof, the Specific Plan entitled the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, the A Map and the B Map and the Project Final EIR (including Mitigation Monitoring Program). Any Future Development Approvals, approved in conformance with Section 3,7 hereof shall become an elemenl of the Development upon the final approval of the same. "Development Plan Approval(s)" means the approvals of the Cily Council and other governmental agencies and other actions and agreements described in Attachment 3 hereto, including those amendments to this Agreement made in accordance with Section 3.5, those amended to the Development Plan Approvals made in accordance with Section 3,6 and those Futura Development Approvals made in accordance with Section 3.7. "Development Transferee" means a person or entity that expressly assumes obligations under this Agreement pursuant to Section 2.5 hereof. "Effective Date" means the date the Authorizing Ordinance becomes effective. This date shall be the thirty-first (31st) day after the second rending of the Authorizing Ordinance. 713471.1 11/19/2002 5 "Existing Regulations" means those ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies of the CITY other than the Development Plan Approval(s) in effect on the Effective Date, which govern the permitted uses of the Property, building heights, the size of structures, the density and intensity of use of the Property, the timing, fees, and conditions to Development, exactions, assessments, the procedures for, and types of, permits required for the Development, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the Property and the infrastructure required for the Development. By way ol enumeration, and not limitation, the Existing Regulations include those portions of the items identified on Attachment 4. The CITY has certified two copies of each of the documents listed on Attachment 4. The CITY has retained one set of the certified documents and has provided OWNER with the second set. The Existing Regulations also are approved and imposed as the zoning and development criteria that apply lo the portion of lhe Property currently within the County of Riverside, pursuant to the City's authority to prezone property pursuant to Califomia Government Code Section 65859, "Future Development Approvals" means lhose entitlements and approvals that are made in accordance with Section 3.7. By way of enumeration, and not limitation, the Future Development Approvals include actions such as development plan review, tentative maps, final maps, use permits, variances, grading permits, occupancy permits and building permits. "Merchant Builder" means a buyer, assignee, or transferee of one or more individual lots or tracts of the Project, acquiring such lots or tracts for the purpose of engaging in the business of developing, constructing improvements, improving, or using such lots or tracts for development. "Off-Site Improvements" includes the improvements set forth on either or both Attachment 5 and in the Development Plan Approval(s). "On-Site Improvements" means physical infrastructure improvements or facilities that are or will be located on the Property as described either or both in the Development Plan Approval(s) and Attachment 5. "OWNER" is Ashby USA, LLC and others who subsequently are assigned the rights and obligations of OWNER pursuant to Section 2.5 hereof. "Planning Commission" means the duly appointed and constituted planning commission of the CITY. "Project" means the development of the Property as set forth in the Development Plan Approval(s). "Project EIR" means that environmental impact report prepared for the Project, as certified on ,2002. 713471.1 11/19/'2002 6 "Property" means that certain real property described in Attachment 1 hereof. "Public Art Program" means the plans, guidelines, and design criteria that will guide the CITY's review of public display art associated with the project. "Public Infrastructure Improvements" mean the improvements intended to be utilized by the public and described on Attachments 5. "Specific Plan" means the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, approved by the CITY on ,2002 and as thereafter amended from time to time in accordance with Section 3.6 of this Agreement. Any reference in this Agreement to a Planning Area shall mean the specified Planning Area as the same is set forth in the Specific Plan as adopted or as amended. "Specific Plan Area" means the Property, regardless of its location within or without the CITY on the Effective Date. "Term" means the time frames set forth in Section 2.3. 2. General Provisions. 2.1 Blndln,q Covenants. Except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement to the extent permitted by law, constitute covenants which shall run with the Property for the benefit thereof, and the benefits and burdens of this Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, all successors in interest to the parties hereto to the extent provided for in this Agreement. 2.2 Interest of OWNER. OWNER represents that OWNER holds fee simple title interest in the Property. 2.3 Term. This Agreement shall become effective on the Effective Date and shall continue for a ten (10) year term from the Commencement Date unless terminated pursuant to this Agreement. Unless terminated pursuant to Seclion 2.4, this Agreement shall terminate at 11:59 p.m. on the tenth (10th) anniversary after the Commencement Date. The final day of this Agreement's regulation of the Property shall change subject to and upon the facts and terms relating to a specific extension(s), force majeure, revision(s), and termination provisions of this Agreement. Nolwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that a court of competent jurisdiction takes any action that stay or delays the Effective Date, and subsequently enters after all appeals or time to appeal have been exhausted, of a final judgment or issuance of a final order directed to the CITY to set aside, withdraw, or abrogate the approval of the City Council of this Agreement, then this Agreement shall be deemed to have no force or effect upon either party. 713471.1 11/19/2002 7 2.4 Termination. This Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further effect, except for any express covenants and agreements that expressly survive termination, upon the occurrence of any of the following events: 2.4.1 Termination occurring pursuant to any provision of this Agreement, including, without limitation, a termination in the event of default; 2.4.2 The completion of the total build-out of the Development pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and the CiTY's Acceptance of all dedications and improvements required to complete Development; or 2.4.3 The expiration of the Term as set forth in Section 2.3. 2.4.4 The failure to form a Public Facilities Financing District (Community Facilities District) prior to the Commencement Date. 2.4.5 OWNER'S failure to complete any Off-Site Improvements or On-Site Improvements within the time frames and/or in the manner approved for such construction activities after any and all cure or remedial periods have lapsed with OWNER. To provide notice to all, and not as a condition of the effectiveness of a termination of this Agreement, the padies agree to execute and record terminations of or releases of this Agreement as may be requested by either party. 2.5 Transfers and Assignments. 2.5.1 Right to Transfer or Assign to End User. OWNER and .any Memhant Builder, shall, without the consent of the CITY or any other party, have the right from time to time and on such number of occasions as it chooses, to sell, assign or otherwise transfer any or all individual lots on final maps approved on the Property or any portion lhereof, to any retail purchaser intending to occupy the unit as his or her principal residence ("End User") at any time during the Term of this Agreement. Absent an express written assumption of the obligations or rights hereunder, upon the sale, assignment, or other transfer to an End User of one or more individual lots, this Agreement shall terminate with respect to such lots without the execution or recordation of any further documentation. For purposes of documentation only, the transferor/assignor shall provide CITY with written notice of the name of the any End User, that assumed rights or obligations hereunder, together with a description of the assumed rights and obligations. 713471.1 11119/2002 8 2.5.2 Right to Assign to Merchant Builder. Provided OWNER has previously delivered the security required of that OWNER by Section 2.5.4 hereof to the CITY, that OWNER shall, without the consent of the CITY or any other party, have the right from time to time and on such number of occasions as it chooses to sell, assign or otherwise transfer its interests in a portion of the Property together with some or all of its rights and obligations under this Agreement with respect to the portion of the Property which is subject to transfer (the 'q'ransferred Property"), to any Merchant Builder at any time during the Term of this Agreement. If the OWNER has not delivered the security required of that OWNER by Section 2.5.4 hereof to the CITY, any assignment or transfer of the Transferred Property together with some or all of that OWNER's rights and obligations under this Agreement with respect to the Transferred Property to a Merchant Builder requires the prior written consent of the CITY, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Any transfer or assignment must be pursuant to a sale, assignment or other transfer of an interest of such OWNER in a portion of the Property and shall be subject to the following criteria and conditions: (i) the transferor/assignor shall notify the CITY at least twenty (20) days prior to the transfer of the name of the Merchant Builder, together with the corresponding rights and obligations, if any, being transferred to such Merchant Builder; and (ii) the agreement between the transferor/assignor and Merchant Builder pertaining to such transfer shall provide, and OWNER shall give CITY notice of such provision, which obligations of OWNER under this Agreement the Merchant Builder shall be liable to perform, and acknowledging lhose obligations OWNER retains. 2.5.3 Assignment of Rights to Subsequent OWNER. Provided OWNER has previously delivered the security required of that OWNER by Section 2.5.4 hereof to the CITY, that OWNER shall, without the consent of the CITY or any other party, have the right from time to time and on such number of occasions as it chooses to sell, assign or otherwise transfer its interests in the Transferred Property together with its rights and obligations under this Agreement as an OWNER wilh respect to the Transferred Property to another person or entity ("Subsequent Owner") at any time during the Term of this Agreement. If the OWNER has not delivered the security required of that OWNER by Section 2.5.4 hereof to the CITY, any assignment or transfer of the Transferred Property together with its rights and obligations under this Agreement as an OWNER with respect to the Transferred Property to a 713471.1 l 1/19/2002 9 Subsequent Owner requires the prior written consent of the CITY, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, Any transfer or assignment must be pursuant to a sale, assignment or other transfer of an interest of such OWNER in a portion of the Property and shall be subject to the following criteda and conditions: (i) the transferor/assignor shall notify the CITY at least twenty (20) day prior Io the transfer of the name of the Subsequent Owner, together with the corresponding rights and obligations, if any, being transferred to such Subsequent Owner; and (ii) fhe agreement between the OWNER and Subsequent Owner pertaining to such transfer shall provide, and OWNER shall give CITY notice of such provision, which obligations of OWNER under this Agreement the Subsequent Owner shall be liable to perform and acknowledging those obligations OWNER retains, Upon transfer of title to the Transferred Property, the Subsequent Owner will be considered an OWNER for all purposes under this Agreement. 2.5.4 Security for Transfer. Prior to transferring or assigning all or a portion of that portion Property without obtaining the prior written consent of the CITY, OWNER shall post a corporate guarantee as security for the construction of the improvements described in Attachment 5 in an amount equal to the costs attributed to those improvements listed on Attachment 5. The amount of the corporate guarantee will be proportionately reduced as the improvements described in Attachment 5 are completed. 2.5.5 Effect of Assignment or Transfer. Unless expressly set forth to the contrary in this Agreement CITY shall require OWNER to perform all promises, duties and obligations set forth in the Development Agreement with the sole exception of those which CITY has consented to be assigned or transferred to a Development Transferee with Obligations. CITY shall look only to the Development Transferee with Obligations to perform the obligations such party is expressly obligated to perform under this Agreement or the action occurring as required by this Agreement and shall require OWNER to perform all other Obligations. 3. Development Provisions. 3.1 Vestin,q. 3.1.1 Project. CITY covenants that OWNER has, during the term of this Agreement, the right to implement the Development pursuant to the Development Plan Approvals and the Existing Regulations, including, without limitation, all specified uses, 2,015 residential dwelling units and 110,000 square feet of commercial retail development, at the building heights, building sizes, lot sizes, infrastructure standards and specifications, densities and types of development provided for in the Specific Plan, and the CITY shall have the right to control the Development in accordance with the Existing Regulations and the Development Plan Approval(s) (~Vested Right"). Except as otherwise expressly specified in this Agreement, the Development Plan Approval(s) shall control the 713471.1 I 1/19/2002 10 design and development, and review and approval of all Future Development Approvals and all Off-Site Improvements and appurtenances in connection therewith. Except to the extent it has been amended, canceled, modified or suspended in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be enforceable by CITY, OWNER or their respective assignees .notwithstanding any change in any Existing Regulation, 3.1.2 Limits on Development. The California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Company v. City of Camarillo, 37 Cal.3d 465 (1984), that the failure of the parties to address certain limits on a CITY's ability to restrict or regulate a development allowed a later adopted initiative to restrict the development. This Agreement cures that deficiency by expressly addressing the timing for the Development, the vested rights afforded by this Agreement and the scope of the CITY's Reserved Authority. Except as expressly set forth in the Development Plan Approval(s), regardless of any future enactment, by initiative, or otherwise, OWNER shall have the discretion to develop the Development in such order, and at such rate, in one phase or in multiple phases, at such times as OWNER deems appropriate within the exemise of its subjective business judgment. Specifically, the CITY agrees that OWNER shall be entitled to apply for and receive the Future Development Approvals and to develop and use the Property at any time during the term of this Agreement, provided that such application is made and such Development occurs in accordance with this Agreement, the other Development Plan Approval(s) and the Existing Regulations. The CITY covenants that no Existing Regulation purports to limit the scope, rate or timing of Development or alter the sequencing of Development in a manner inconsistent with the Development Plan Approval(s). No future amendment of any CITY law, or future adoption of any CITY law or other action, that purports to limit the scope, rate or timing of Development on the Property shall apply to the Property. In particular, but without limiting any of the foregoing, no numerical restriction shall be placed by CITY on the number of dwellings units or amount of commercial development that may be built in any particular year on any portion of the Property other than permitted by this Agreement. 3.1.3 Entitlements, Permits and Approvals - Cooperation. 3.1.3.1 Processing. CITY agrees that it shall accept and expeditiously process, pursuant to CITY's regular procedures, OWNER's applications for amendments to this Agreement, amendments to the Development Plan Approval(s) and the Future Development Approvals. 3.1.3.2 Further Mitigation. In connection with lhe issuance of any Future Development Approvals which are subject to review under CEQA, unless required under the California Public Resource Code and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, the CITY shall not impose any environmental land use project alternatives or mitigation measures on OWNER or the Property beyond those referenced in the Development Plan Approval(s). 7134.71.1 l 1/19,r2002 1! 3.1.3.3 Other Permits. The CITY further agrees to reasonably cooperate with OWNER, at no cost to the CITY, in securing any County, Local Agency Formation Commission, State and Federal permits or authorizations which may be required in connection with Development of the Property. Except as expressly provided for in this Agreement, this cooperation shall not require any economic contribution or similar consideration by the CITY. 3.1.3.4 Litigation. The CITY agrees to reasonably cooperate with OWNER in all reasonable manners in order to keep this Agreement in full force and effect. If any legal action is instituted by a third party or other governmental entity or official challenging the Development Plan Approval(s) or Future Development Approvals, the parties hereby agree to cooperate in the defense of this action. CITY shall defend its interests under this Agreement using attorneys of its own sole selection and OWNER agrees that OWNER shall be responsible for all of CITY's costs, including, but not limited to, attorneys fees, costs, expert witnesses, travel, exhibits, displays and the like. OWNER shall reimburse CITY its costs within thirty (30) calendar days of receipl of any invoice(s) by OWNER requesting payment for any such costs. 3.1.3.5 Acquisition of Off-Site Property. 3.1.3.5.1 The CITY shall not postpone or refuse approval of a Future Development Approval because the OWNER or Development Transferee has failed to acquire off-site property required for the construction or installation of Off-Site Improvements so long as OWNER complies with Subsection 3.1.3.5.3. CITY shall use its authority pursuant to California Govemment Code Section 66462.5 to seek to acquire the necessary interests. 3.1.3.5.2 If there are delays in the acquisition of the right-of-way for the off-site or County of Riverside portions of Buttarfield Stage Road, CITY may in its discretion, issue additional building permits beyond the Five Hundred Tenth (510t~). The additional building permits beyond the 510th shall be limited to no more than Fifty (50) every six months. In no event, shall the CITY issue mom than a total of Two Hundred (200) additional building permits beyond the initial 510 permits. 3.1.3.5.3 To the extent the OWNER or a Development Transferee does not have sufficient title or inlerest in the real property to be improved to permit an Off-Site Improvement to be made the OWNER or Development Transferee shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required properly in a timeframe calculated to allow for the orderly development of the Project. If the OWNER or Development Transferee is unable to acquire the required property, the CITY shall consider in good faith the acquisition of the required property. Subject to the following, if the CITY is unable to acquire the required property by negotiation or condemnation within the time frame provided for in Government Code Section 66462.5, the CITY shall not use such failure as 713471.1 11119/2002 12 grounds to deny Future Development Apprevais except for building permits for the Project despite the fact that the Off-Site Improvement has not been completed, subject to OWNER delivering to CITY the full sum of monies described hereafter. Further, the CITY's obligation to continue to issue Future Development Approvals as provided for in this Section is contingent upon: (i) the applicable OWNER or Development Transferee having made a timely submittal of the improvement plans required for the respective Oft-Site Improvement to the CITY; and (ii) consistent with Government Code Section 66462.5, the OWNER or Development Transferee enters into an agreement with the CITY to reimburse the CITY for costs incurred by the CITY in acquiring the required property; and (iii) so long as OWNER or Development Transferee has deposited with CITY an amount equal to the CITY's calculation of the costs necessary to design the Off- Site Improvements, acquire the real property, enter into a contract for such public work subject to all legal requirements and to construct the Public Infrastructure Improvement(s) which are uncompleted. CITY may use these funds for community circulation/transportation improvements within the Specific Plan Area in ils sole discretion. 3.2 Reserved Authority. 3.2.1 Uniform Codes. This Agreement shall not prevent the CITY from applying new "uniform" construction standards adopted by the State of California as State Codes, such as the Uniform Building Code, National Electrical Code, Uniform Mechanical Code or Uniform Fire Code, to the Development, provided those same standards are applied to all other development within the CITY. 3.2.2 State and Federal Laws and Regulations. Subject to compliance with the requirements of this Section 3.2.2, the Property may be subject to subsequently enacted state or federal laws or regulations which preempt local regulations, or mandate the adoption of local regulations, and are in conflict with the Development Plan Approval(s). Upon the identification of a subsequently enacted federal or state law meeting the requirements of this Section, CITY or OWNER shall provide the other parties with written notice of the state or federal law or regulation, provide a copy of the law or regulation, and a wrilten statement of conflicts with the provisions of this Agreement. Promptly thereafter CITY and OWNER shall meet and confer in good faith in a reasonable attempt to determine whether a modification or suspension of this Agreement, in whole or in part, is necessary to comply with such federal or state law or regulation. In such discussions, CITY and OWNER agree to preserve the terms of this Agreement and the rights of OWNER as derived from this Agreement to the maximum feasible extent while resolving the conflict. CITY agrees to cooperate with OWNER in resolving the conflict in a manner which minimizes any financial impact of the conflict upon OWNER without materially increasing the financial obligations of CITY under this Agreement. CITY also agrees to process in a prompt manner OWNER's proposed changes to the Project as may be necessary to comply with such Federal or State law; provided, however, that 713471,1 11/19/2002 13 the approval of such changes by CITY shall be subject to the discretion of CITY, consistent with this Agreement. 3.2.3 Regulation for Health and Safety. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to be in derogation of CITY's police power to protect the public health and safety from a sudden, unexpected occurrence, involving a clear and imminent danger, demanding immediate and interim action to prevent or mitigate loss of, or damage to, life, health, property, or essential public services involving the Property or the immediate community (~Exigent Event"). Upon discovery of an Exigent Event, CITY may suspend this Agreement for a period reasonably necessary to analyze, evaluate and develop a response to the Exigent Event following delivery of written notice of suspension to OWNER. Immediately thereafter, the suspension shall end and CITY shall provide the OWNER with written notice of the existence of the Exigent Event, a detailed explanation of the CITY's proposed action, and a written statement of conflicts with the provisions of this Agreement. Promptly thereafter CITY and OWNER shall meet and confer in good faith in a reasonable attempt to determine whether a modification or suspension of this Agreement, in whole or in part, is necessary to comply with the Exigent Event. In such discussions, CITY and OWNER agree to preserve the terms of this Agreement and the rights of OWNER as derived from this Agreement to the maximum feasible extent while resolving the conflict. CITY agrees to cooperate with OWNER in resolving the conflict in a manner which minimizes any financial impact of the conflict upon OWNER without materially increasing the financial obligations of CITY under this Agreement. CITY also agrees to process in an expedited manner OWNER's proposed changes to the Project as may be necessary to comply with the Exigent Event; provided, however, that the approval of such changes by CITY shall be subject Io the discretion of CITY, consistent with this Agreement. 3.3 Further Assurances to OWNER Reqardim:l Exercise of Reserved Authority. 3.3.1 Judicial Review. Based on the foregoing, if OWNER judicially (including by way of a reference proceeding) challenges the application of a future rule, regulation or policy as being in violation of this Agreement and as not being applied in accordance with the Reserved Authority, OWNER shall bear the burden of alleging that such rule, regulation or policy is inconsistent with the Existing Regulations and the Development Plan Approval(s) and the CITY shall thereafter bear the burden of proof in establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that such regulation was adopted pursuant to and in accordance with the Reserved Authority and was not applied by the CITY in violation of this Agreement. 3.4 Consistent and Inconsistent Enactments. 3.4.1 No Conflicting Enactments. The CITY shall not enact a rule, regulation, ordinance, policy, permit or other measure (collectively ~Law"), 713471.1 11/19/2002 14 nor take any action applicable to the Project or the Property, which governs the rate, timing, scope, intensity, use, density, manner, or sequencing of the Development, or any part thereof and which is inconsistent or in conflict with the Development Plan Approval(s). By way of enumeration, and not limitation, any law, action or inaction, whether by specific reference to the Project, this Agreement or otherwise, shall be considered to conflict if it: 3.4.1.1 Restricts the Vested Rights described in lhe Agreement or in any way limits or reduces lhe rate, timing, scope, intensity, use, density, manner, or sequencing of the Development or otherwise requires any reduction or increase in the number, size, height or square footage of lot(s), structures, buildings or other improvements, modifies the standards and specifications applicable to the infrastructure required for the Development or requires additional dedications, exactions, fees or mitigation other than that provided for in the Agreement; 3.4.1.2 Is consistent with Section 3.4.1.1 hereof, but is not uniformly applied by the CITY to all substantially similar development within the CITY; or 3.4.1.3 Imposes a new permit requirement or procedure not already part of the Existing Regulations. 3.4.2 Consistent Enactments. By way of enumeration and not limitation, the following types of enactments shall be considered consistent with this Agreement and Existing Regulations and not in conflic[: 3.4.2.1 Transfers of units or permitted uses as requested by OWNER within the Property as provided for in Sections 2 and 3 of the Specific Plan; 3.4.2.2 Changes in the phasing of the Development pursuant to an application from OWNER and as first approved by the CITY; and 3.4.2.3 Any enactment authorized by this Agreement. 3.4.3 Consistency Between This Agreement, the Development Plan Approval(s) and Existing Regulations. To the extent a conflict exists or develops between the Existing Regulations and the Development Plan Approval(s), the Development Plan Approval(s) shall be controlling. To the extent a conflict exists or develops between this Agreement and any other Development Plan Approval(s), this Agreement shall be controlling. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the mitigation requirements within the EIR shall be carried out as set forth therein, or as may be amended from time to time. 713471.1 11/19/2002 15 3.4.4 Map Act Consistency. As required by California Government Code Section 65867.5, any tentative map prepared for the Project shall comply with California Government Code Section 66473.7. 3.5 Amendment of Development Agreement. 3.5.1 Initiation of Amendment. Either CITY or OWNER may propose an amendment to this Agreement. An operating memorandum, as defined below, is not an amendment of this Agreement. 3.5.2 Changes Requiring an Amendment. Unless otherwise required by law, neilher an amendment to the Development Plan Approval(s) nor the approval of a Future Development Approval shall require an amendment of this Agreement unless the amendment: 3.5.2.1 Materially alters the permitted uses of the Property as a whole in a manner inconsistent with the procedures established in the Specific Plan; 3.5.2.2 Property as a whole; Increases the density or intensity of use of the 3.5.2.3 Increases the maximum heighl and size of permitted buildings. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, an amendment of this Agreement is not required if OWNER pursues entitlements, permits or approvals pursuant to a waiver of vested rights as provided for in Section 4.1. 3.5.3 Procedure. Except as set forth in Section 3.5.5 below, the procedure for proposing and adopting an amendment to this Agreement shall be the same as the procedure required for entering into this Agreement in the first instance. 3.5.4 Consent. Any amendment to this Agreement shall require the written consent of both the CITY and the OWNER whose portion of the Property would be materially affected by the amendment. No amendment to all or any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless set forth in writing, signed by duly authorized representatives of the CITY and the applicable OWNER, and adopted pursuant to legal requirements imposed on CITY. An amendment of this Agreement does not require the consent of a Development Transferee unless the rights, duties, or obligations of the Development Transferee are affected. To the extent the consent of the OWNER that did not initiate the amendment is necessary, that OWNER shall not unreasonably withhold its consent. Notwithstanding the above, that OWNER shall consent to the amendment on or before the thirtieth (30th) day after receipt of notice of the initiation of the amendment if, as determined in that OWNER's reasonable 71347t.1 11/19/2002 16 business judgment, that proposed amendment will not have a material adverse impact on the Development of that OWNER's portion of the Properly. 3.5.5 Operating Memoranda. The parties acknowledge that refinements and further development of the Project may demonstrate that changes are appropriate with respect to the details and performance of the parties under this Agreement. The parties desire to retain a certain degree of flexibilily with respect to the details of the Development Plan and with respect to those items covered in general terms under this Agreement. If and when the parties and, if applicable, a Development Transferee, mutually find that nonsubstantive changes, adjustments, or clarifications are appropriate to further the intended purposes of this Agreement, and such are not materially inconsistent with the Development Plan Approval(s), they may, unless otherwise required by law, effectuate such changes, adjustments, or clarifications without amendment to this Agreement through one or more operating memoranda mutually approved by the City Manager, or designee, on behalf of the CITY and by any corporate officer or other person designated for such purpose in a writing signed by a corporate officer on behalf of OWNER, which, after execution, shall be attached hereto as addenda and become a part hereof. Unless otherwise required by law or by the Development Plan Approval(s), no such changes, adjustments, or clarifications shall require prior notice or hearing, public or otherwise. Nothing herein shall authorize the delegation of authority to the City Manager, or designee, contrary to California or Federal Law. 3.6 Future Amendments to Development Plan AoDroval(s}. The following rules apply to future amendments to the Development Plan Approval(s), except that Section 3.5 shall control with respect Io a nonsubstantive adjustment of this Agreement and Section 3.7 shall control with respect to Future Development Approvals: 3.6.1 OWNER's Written Consent. It is contemplated by the parties that mutually agreed upon amendments to the Development Plan Approval(s) may be necessary. Any amendments to the Development Plan Approval(s) to which OWNER does not agree in writing shall not apply to the Property or the Project while this Agreement is in effect. 3.6.2 Concurrent Development Agreement Amendment, Any entitlement requiring amendment of this Agreement, as provided for in Section 3.5 hereof, shall be processed concurrently with an amendment to this Agreement in the manner required by law. 3.6.3 Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly set forth within this Agreement, an amendment of the other Development Plan Approval(s) will not alter, affect, impair or otherwise impact the rights, duties and obligations of the parties under this Agreement. To the extent an amendment to the Development Plan Approval(s) is approved in accordance with Section 3.6.1, the 713471.1 11/19/'2002 17 amendment shall constitute for all purposes a Development Plan Approval and shall be treated as if it were in existence on the Agreement Date. 3.7 Future Development Approvals. 3.7.1 Exercise of CITY Discretion. In connection with Future Development Approval or any other actions which the CITY is expressly permitted to make under this Agreement relating to the Project, the CITY shall exercise its discretion or take action in a manner which complies and is consistent with the Development Plan Approval(s) and the Existing Regulations. 3,7.2 Concurrent Development Agreement Amendment. Any Future Development Approval requiring amendment of this Agreement, as provided for in Section 3.5 hereof, shall be processed concurrently with an amendment to this Agreement. 3.7.3 Effect of Future Development Approvals. Except as expressly set forth within this Section 3.7, a Future Development Approval will not alter, affect, impair or otherwise impact the rights, duties and obligations of the parties under this Agreement. To the extent a Future Development Approval is approved in accordance with Sections 3.7.1 and 3.7.2, the Future Development Approval shall constitute for all purposes a Development Plan Approval and shall be treated as if it were in existence on the Agreement Date. 4. Obligations of the Parties. 4.1 Fee and Exaction Related Responsibilities. 4.1.1 Development Impact Fees. CITY has adopted an ordinance requiring the payment of Development Impact Fees ("DIF"). This Agreement affects the means by which the DIF are collected and accounted for as regards the Project. The CITY will credit, and thus not require cash payment to the CITY from OWNER, except as where cash payments are specified in this Agreement. The per unit credit against otherwise payable DIF will be calculated at the time each building permit is obtained by OWNER as issued by CITY. CITY will carry the credit in its accounts, and the same will be evidence of an indebtedness OWNER owes to CITY. CITY will grant the credit to OWNER and deem the debt satisfied at such time as CITY Accepts that part of either/or both the On-Site and Off-Site Improvements that are within the scope of each individual DIF category specified hereunder. In the event OWNER fails to obtain the CITY's Acceptance of either or both any On-Site or Off-Site Improvement then CiTY may elect to (i) deem the DIF that is applicable to the type of improvement or subject matter then due and payable in the full amount OWNER would have been required to pay pursuant to the DIF schedule in effect when the Building permit is issued by CITY for each building permit; (ii) cease issuance of building permits for all or any portion of the Project; (iii) seek specific performance of the On-Site or Off-Site Improvements; or (iv) seek any other 713471.1 11/19/2002 18 remedy available in law or equity. CITY's election may include any one or any combination of the foregoing remedies. The DIF is comprised of several components, each corresponding to different elements of the On-Site and Off-Site Improvements. The individual component and the credit, if any, is set fodh hereunder. 4.1.1.1 Street Improvement DIF Component. The OWNER shall be granted a credit for One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Street Improvement component so long as OWNER completes and CITY Accepts the On-Site and Off-Site Improvements. 4.1.1.2 Traffic Signal DIF Component. The OWNER shall be granted a credit for One Hundred pement (100%) of the Traffic Signal component so long as OWNER completes and CITY Accepts the On-Site and Off-Site Improvements. 4.1.1.3 Library and Corporate Facilities DIF Components. These components require cash payment of the fees in effect at the time of issuance of each building permit. 4.1.1.4 Fire DIF Component. The OWNER shall be granted a credit for One Hundred percent (100%) of the Fire component so long as OWNER completes and CITY Accepts the Fire Service Improvements as defined in Section 4.1.6 a and b. 4.1.1.5 Park and Recreation DIF Component. The OWNER shall be granted a credit for One Hundred percent (100%) of the Park's component so long as OWNER completes, and CITY Accepts, the park improvements. The Parks shall be built in accordance with the Specific Plan, which includes the following specific matters. a, A 19.7-acre Sports Park (Planning Area 27). b. A 5.1-acre Neighborhood Park (Planning Area 6). c. The developer shall also be responsible to design and construct not less than a half-width slreet and right-of-way improvements, related grading and utility connections to the park site at the Developer's cost with no credits towards the Park and Recreation Component of DIF. In addition to any other improvements OWNER shall construct, at its own cost, not later than the th thirtieth (30) day before the Acceptance of each park, including the following: 1, Street and right-of-way improvements adjacent to the Sports Park, including Butterfield Stage Road and the North Loop. 713471.1 11/19/2002 19 2. Street and right-of-way improvements adjacent to the Neighborhood Park including Murrieta Hot Springs Road and ~A" Street as referenced in the Specific Plan. 4.1.1.5.1 General Parks Provisions. a. All real property shall be conveyed as provided for in Section 4.1.1.5 and 4.4.1 OWNER shall demonstrate the condition of title pursuant to CLTA title insurance policies, in an amount equal to both the value of the land and the actual costs of the improvements located thereon. b. OWNER shall work with the CITY to design the Community Sports Park and the Neighborhood Park site to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services and consistent with the requirements of Section 4.2.1 of the Specific Plan. c. The Community Sports Park will generally be improved with two (2) lighted full sized soccer fields, two (2) lighted full sized ball fields, two (2) lighted basketball courts, a restroom/concession/maintenance building, age appropriale play structures, picnic shelter, concrete walkways and parking improvements. The Park Development Impact Fee credit allocated to OWNER under this Agreement for the design and construction of the Community Park is $2,909,989.00. OWNER shall provide verification to the CITY of actual design and construction costs. Any and all design and construction cost in excess of $2,909,989.00 shall be the sole responsibility of OWNER. The Community Sports Park shall be completed, including the completion of the 90-day maintenance and establishment period to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services and the grant deed Accepted by the City Council, prior to the issuance of the 700th residential building permit in the Project. d. The Neighborhood Park will generally be improved with age appropriate play structures, one (1) lighted basketball court, restroom, picnic shelter, open turf area, concrete walkways and parking improvements. The Park Development Impact Fee credit allocated to OWNER under this Agreement for the design and construction of the Neighborhood Park is $625,000. OWNER shall provide verification to the CITY of actual design and construction cost. Any and all design and construction cost in excess of $625,000 shall be the sole responsibility of OWNER. The Neighborhood Park shall be completed, including the completion of the 90-day maintenance and establishment pedod to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services and the grant deed Accepled by the City Council, prior to the issuance of the 400th residential building permit in the Project. 713471.1 11/19/2002 20 4.1.2 Quimby Fee. The Project, pursuant to the requirements of Section 16.33 of the CITY's Subdivision Ordinance is obligated to provide 28.71 acres of real property for park and recreation purposes. This requirement will be satisfied in full upon CiTY's Acceptance of the real property and the OWNER's completion of the private recreation components as described in Sections 2.8.1 and 4.2.2 of the Specific Plan. 4.1.3 Development Agreement Fee. OWNER shall pay to the CITY the aggregate sum of money determined by the following formula. Add the sum of the following formula: $1,500 x 2015 (the maximum number of residential dwelling units allowed under the Specific Plan) = $3,022,500 To the sum of the following formula: $3.00 x 110,000 (the maximum amount of square feet of commercial development allowed under the Specific Plan)= $330,000 Total sum due CITY: $3,352,500. 4.1.3.1 CiTY Collection of Funds. a. OWNER recognizes that the City will draw a sum of Two Million Dollars $2,000,000 from the CFD proceeds shall pay to CITY, and CITY shall accept the sum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) for CITY-to use for the provision of the Fire Service Improvements described in Section 4.1.6. The monies shall be paid to CITY within thirty (30) calendar days of the formation and funding of the public finance district referenced in Section 4.3. b. CITY shall defer collection of the remaining monies attributable to this fee ($1,352,500.00) lo the formation of the public finance district. At the time the public facilities finance mechanism, as referenced in Section 4.3, is funded, this debt will be deemed satisfied in full. if the financing mechanism is not in place on the one year anniversary date of this Agreement, OWNER shall, without demand by CITY, deliver CITY the sum of $1,352,500.00 on the day immediately following the described one year anniversary date. 4.1.4 Fee for Public Art, Open Space and Habitat Preservation. In consideration of CITY's performance pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, OWNER agrees to pay to City a fee of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per dwelling unit which the CITY agrees to use for City-owned public art and open space and habitat preservation purposes. The fee will be paid upon the issuance of each building permit for a dwelling unit, The CITY agrees lo use all proceeds of the art fee paid pursuant to this Section on a site located within the Property. 713471.1 11/19/2002 21 Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY agrees to waive and/or defer the following sums pursuant to the following terms: a. Credit in the amount of One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00) per residential unit in consideration of OWNER'S contribution of approximately 200 acres of open space and other contributions towards the acquisition of open space lands, b. Credit in the sum of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) per residential unit so long as OWNER provides the full sum "Art in Public Places" monies calculated by multiplying the number of units permitted by the Specific Plan times the $50.00 sum per unit. Prior Io the issuance of the 301st building permit, the OWNER shall prepare, and submit to CITY for review and approval, a Public Art Program. The design of the art piece(s) shall be approved by lhe Community Services Director pursuant to such Public Art Program. The location of the art piece(s) shall be consistent with the approved Public Arts Program. The approved public art shall be installed by OWNER and Accepted by CITY prior to the issuance of the 510~ building permit within the Project. 4.1.5 Transit Contributions. a. Transit Mitigation Fee. A Transit Mitigation Fee in the amount of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) shall be paid by OWNER to CITY prior to the 510th building permit being issued by CITY for the project. The funds may be used to further any objective of the Agreement between the CITY and RTA. b, Park-N-Ride. OWNER shall provide, as described in the Specific Plan, fifty (50) designated park-n-ride spaces for public use prior to the issuance of the 1st building permit in Planning Areas 10, 12, 14 through 23, 31,33A, and 33B. The spaces shall be consistent with the standards set forth in the Specific Plan. 4.1.6 Fire Service Improvements, The following shall satisfy OWNER's obligations regarding this component. a. Conveyance of Land. On or before the thirtieth (30~) calendar day after the Annexation Date of this Agreement, OWNER accomplish the following: 1. Fee simple title shall be conveyed to CITY, free and clear of all liens and matters of record; 2. OWNER shall provide CITY a CLTA insurance policy insuring CITY's title to the Station Site in an amount equal to the fair market value of the Station Site. 713471.1 11/19/2002 22 3. The parcel shall have not less than one and one-half (1.5) acre of flat land usable for development as a CITY fire station. In no event shall the site be in excess of three (3) gross acres. b. Gradinq. Prior to the issuance of the first (1st) building permit, OWNER shall rough grade the parcel. c. Construction. Pursuant to the following, OWNER shall tender and CITY shall Accept from OWNER the unrestricted right to utilize sum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) for the purpose of CITY to design and construct a Fire Station and acquire title to a fire truck of City's selection. Until the Fire Station is constructed, manned, equipped and deemed operational by the Fire Chief of CITY and the secondary access, as defined ion Attachment 5, is completed OWNER, and any Development Transferee, shall not be issued and shall not seek the issuance of any building permit in any Planning Area, as the same is defined in the Specific Plan, with the sole exception of a total of One Hundered Seven (107) residential building permits within Planning Areas lA, 2, and 3. Upon receipt of the right to the development monies and the real property CiTY shall commence and complele the design and construction of the Fire Station. CITY anticipates completing the construclion of the Fire Station on or before twenly-four (24) months from the date the monies and land are received. The Fire Chief, in his sole discrelion may allow a maximum of 250 residential building permits total for the project to be issued within Planning Areas lA, 2, 3, 4A, and 4B so long as the permanent fire station and the secondary access, as defined in Attachmenl 5 are substantially under construction at the time such additional building permits are requested. d. Fire Station Construclion Street Improvements. OWNER shall, subject to final review and Acceptance by CITY, construct the street improvements adjacent to the Fire Station in conformance wilh the conditions set forth in this Agreement and subject to the CITY's approved street improvement plans for the public street(s) which are immediately adjacent to the Fire Station. OWNER shall commence and complete the street improvements, including but not limited to, asphalt concrete travel lanes, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk per Specific Plan and right-of-way landscaping as required by CITY, The improvements described in this Section shall be completed not less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the date the CITY will place the Fire Station in full operation. e. Release. Upon the funding of the public finance district or other financing mechanism and CITY's ability to utilize such monies for construction of a permanent fire station as described in Section 4.1.6, and the Acceptance of title to the site, then OWNER's further obligations to pay the Fire Component of the Development Impact Fee will be credited by CITY, and CITY 713471.1 I 1/19/2002 23 shall not impose restrictions on building permit issuance based upon nonpayment of the Fire Component of the Development Impact Fee. f. Limitation on Participation. The OWNER agrees to not participate in the design or construction of the fire station, even if it is funded by a public financing district. However, to ensure amhitectural compatibility with future development, CITY agrees to allow OWNER's amhitect to coordinate with the architect hired by CITY for the sole purpose of providing input into the amhitectural themes of the exterior lo the fire station. 4.1.7 Other Fees. a. Processin.q and Application Fees. OWNER shall pay the application and processing fees customarily imposed on the type of entitlement or permit sought at the rate, and in the amount, imposed by CITY pursuant to the fee schedule, resolution or ordinance applicable to all projects in the CITY and in effect at the time the application is submitted to and accepted as complete by the CITY. b. Transportation Uniform Mitiqation Fee (TUMF). TUMF is anticipated to be adopted by both CITY and the County of Riverside. OWNER shall pay all TUMF fees that are required to be paid under TUMF, in accordance with the terms of the program that are in effect at the time OWNER obtains each building permit. 4.2 Physical Improvements. In consideration of the CITY's promises and performances OWNER agrees to the following: 4.2.1 Off-site Improvements Subject to CITY's assistance pursuant to Section 3.1.3.5. OWNER shall be solely responsible for funding, acquiring right-of-way, slope easemenls, rights of entry, temporary construction easements, as well constructing all improvements identified in Attachment 5. 4.2.2 On-Site Improvements. OWNER shall be solely responsible for funding, acquiring right-of-way, slope easements, rights of entry, temporary construction easements, as well constructing all other on-site improvements. A list of impgrtant on-site improvements is identified in Attachment 5. 4.3 Public Facility Financing Plan. In consideration for OWNER's commitments under this Agreement to provide certain On-Site and Off-Site Improvements and to assist in the formation thereof, the CITY agrees to use best efforts to cause to be formed a means lo finance the Improvements, which most likely will be a Community Facilities District ("CFD"). The parties agree that no building permit within any Planning Area, regardless of whether the improvements will be public or private or commemial or residential, shall be 713471.1 11/19/2002 24 issued until the CFD is formed and funded, CITY shall determine the appropriateness of all proposed improvements financed through the CFD. 4.4 Related Real Property Conveyances; Conditions to Development A,qreement. 4.4.1 Mens, Encumbrances and Environmental Conditions. All real property dedicated to the CITY pursuant to this Agreement shall be free and clear of any and all matters of record that the CITY objects to in its sole discretion, including but not limited to matters which require the direct payment of money (excluding all non-delinquent taxes and assessments), including but not limited to, deeds of trust and mechanic liens. The real property shall also be dedicated free of other encumbrances of record that would prevent the CITY from using such dedicated facility for its intended use as identified herein or as reasonably inferred as relating. Further the real property shall be warranted, to the best of OWNER's actual knowledge, to be free of any known environmental conditions that would prevent the real property from being used as intended by the CITY. OWNER shall provide the CITY copies of all reports, investigations and analysis that discuss the environmental condition of the real property. 5. Indemnification. Except to the extent of the active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties (as defined below), OWNER, with respect to the Property, and the Development Transferee, with respect to the portion of the Property transferred to that Development Transferee, agree Ihat during the Term of this Agreement, to defend the CITY and its agents, officers, contractors, attorney, and employees (the "Indemnified Parties") from and against any claims or proceeding against the Indemnified Parties to set aside, void or annul the approval of this Agreement. OWNER and Development Transferee may be individually referred to herein as "Indemnifying Party' and collectively as "indemnifying Parties". Each Indemnifying Party shall retain settlement authority with respect to any matter concerning that Indemnifying Party provided that prior to settling any such lawsuil or claim with respect to that Indemnifying Party, the Indemnifying Party shall provide the CITY and the other Indemnifying Parties with a minimum ten (10) business days written notice of its intent to settle such lawsuit or claim. If the CITY or the other Indemnifying Parties, in their reasonable discretion, do not desire to settle such lawsuit or claim, it may notify the applicable indemnifying Party of the same, in which event the applicable Indemnifying Party may still elect to settle the lawsuit or claim as to itself, but the non-settling parties may elect to continue such lawsuit, at their cost and expense, so long as: (i) with respect to the CITY, the CITY's decision is predicated upon a legitimate and articulated threat to either the exercise of its police powers or a risk of harm to those present within the CITY; or (ii) with respect to the other Indemnifying Parties, the decision is predicated upon a legitimate and articulated threat to the Development of that Indemnifying Pady's property. 713471.1 11/19/2002 25 6. Relationship of Parties. OWNER is not the agent or employee of the CITY. The CITY and OWNER hereby renounce the existence of any form of joint venture or partnership between them, and agree that nothing contained in this Agreement or in any document executed in connection with the Project shall be construed as making the CITY and OWNER joint ventures or partners. 7. Periodic Review of Compliance With Agreement. 7.1 Periodic Review. The CITY and OWNER shall review this Agreement once every 12-month period from the Effective Date until the Agreement terminates. The CITY shall notify OWNER in writing of the date for review at least thirty (30) days prior thereto. 7.2 Good Faith Compliance. During each periodic review, OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with all material terms of this Agreement. The parties recognize that this Agreement and the documents incorporated herein could be deemed to contain hundreds of requirements and that evidence of each and every requirement would be a wasteful exercise of the parties' resources. Accordingly, OWNER shall be deemed to have satisfied its good faith compliance when it presents evidence of substantial compliance with the material provisions of this Agreement. Generalized evidence or statements of compliance shall be Accepted in the absence of any evidence that such evidence is untrue. 7.3 Failure to Conduct Annual Review. The failure of the CITY to conduct the annual review shall not constitute, or be asserted by OWNER or CITY as a breach of this Agreement. 7.4 Initiation of Review by City Council. In addition to the annual review, the City Council may at any time initiate a review of this Agreement by giving written notice to OWNER. The Notice must describe in detail the specific issues which caused the CITY to question OWNER'S good faith compliance and the evidence the CITY believes is necessary for the review. Within thirty (30) days following receipt of such notice, OWNER shall submit evidence to the City Council of OWNER's good faith compliance with this Agreement and such review and determination shall proceed in the same manner as provided for the annual review. The City Council shall initiate its review pursuant to this Section 7.4 only if it has probable cause to believe the CITY's general health, safety or welfare is at risk as a result of specific acts or failures to act by OWNER in violation of this Agreement. 7.5 Administration of Agreement. Any final decision by the CITY staff concerning the interpretation and administration of this Agreement and Development of the Property in accordance herewith may be appealed by OWNER first to the Planning Commission and thereafter to the City Council, provided that any such appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after OWNER receives written notice that the staff decision is final ail as 713471.1 I 1/19./2002 26 pursuant to murine planning appeal procedures. The City Council shall render, at a noticed public hearing, its decision to affirm, reverse or modify the staff decision within thirty (30) days after the appeal was filed. 7.6 Availability of Documents. If requested and reimbursed for all costs, by OWNER, the CITY agrees to provide to OWNER copies of any documents, reports or other items reviewed, accumulated or prepared by or for the CITY in connection with any periodic compliance review by the CITY, provided OWNER reimburses the CITY for all reasonable and direct costs and fees incurred by the CITY in copying the same. The CITY shall respond to OWNER's request on or before ten (10) business days have elapsed from the CITY's receipt of such request. 8. Events of Default: Remedies and Termination. Unless amended as provided in Section 3.5, or modified or suspended pursuant to Government Code Section 65869.5 or terminated pursuant to this Section 8, this Agreement is enfomeable by any party hereto. 8.1 Defaults by OWNER. If, after following the procedures established in Section 7 hereof, the CITY determines on the basis of a preponderance of the evidence that OWNER has not complied in good faith wilh the material terms and conditions of this Agreement, the CITY shall, by written notice to OWNER specify the manner in which the allegedly defaulting party has failed to so comply and state the steps the allegedly defaulting party must take to bring itself into compliance. If, within thirty (30) days after the effective date of notice from the CITY specifying the manner in which the allegedly defaulting party has failed to so comply, the allegedly defaulting party does not commence all steps reasonably necessary to bring itself into compliance and thereafter diligently pursue such steps to completion, then the allegedly defaulting party shall be deemed to be in default under the terms of this Agreement and the CITY may terminate this Agreement with respect solely to Ihe allegedly defaulting party's property pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.1 or may seek specific performance as set forth in Section 8.3. 8.2 Defaults by CITY. If OWNER determines on the basis of a preponderance of the evidence that the CITY has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, OWNER shall, by written notice to the CITY, specify the manner in which the CITY has failed to so comply and state the steps the CITY must take to bring itself into compliance. If, within sixty (60) days after the effective date of notice from OWNER specifying the manner in which the CITY has failed to so comply, the CITY does not commence all steps reasonably necessary to bring itself into compliance as required and thereafter diligently pursue such steps to completion, then the CITY shall be deemed to be in default under the terms of this Agreement and OWNER may terminate this Agreement and, in addition, may pursue specific performance as set forth in Section 8.3. OWNER shall not retain the right to seek, and hereby expressly 713471.1 11/19/2002 27 waives, the right to seek damages against CITY for any action or failure to act under this Agreement. 8.3 Specific Performance Remedy. Due to the size, nature and scope of the Project, it may not be practical or possible to restore the Preperty to its natural condition once implementation of this Agreement has begun. After such implementation, OWNER may be foreclosed from other choices it may have had to utilize the Property and provide for other benefits. CITY and OWNER has already invested significant time and resources and performed extensive planning and processing of the Project in agreeing to the terms of this Agreement and will be investing even more significant time and resources in implementing lhe Project in reliance upon the terms of this Agreement, and it may not be possible to determine the sum of money which would adequately compensate OWNER for such efforts. For the above reasons, the CITY and OWNER agree that damages may not be an adequate remedy if the CITY or OWNER fails to carry out its obligations under this Agreement and that CITY or OWNER shall have the right to seek and obtain specific performance as a remedy for any breach of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the CITY is authorized by Section 8.4.1 to withhold an approval or permit upon a specified condition being satisfied by OWNER in the future, and if OWNER then fails to satisfy such condition, the CITY may be entitled to specific performance for the sole purpose of causing that nonperforming party, and only that nonperforming party, or any party with an obligation to so perform the condition, to satisfy such condition. The CITY's right to specific performance shall be limited to those circumstances set forth above, and the CITY shall have no right to seek specific performance to cause OWNER or a Development Transferee to otherwise proceed with the Development of the Project in any manner, with the express exception of the Off-Site Improvements 8.4 Institution of Legal Action. Any legal action hereunder shall be heard by a reference from the Riverside County Superior Court pursuant to the reference procedures of the California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 638, et seq. OWNER and lhe CITY shall agree upon a single referee who shall then try all issues, whether of fact or law, and report a finding and judgment thereon and issue all legal and equitable relief appropriate under the circumstances of the controversy before him. If OWNER and the CITY are unable Io agree on a referee within ten (10) days of a written request to do so by either party hereto, either party may seek to have one appointed pursuant to the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 640. The cost of such proceeding shall initially be borne equally by the parties. Any referee selected pursuant to this Section 8.4 shall be considered a temporary judge appointed pursuant to Article 6, Section 21 of the California Constitution. 8.4.1 Effect of Noncompliance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent the Development Plan Approval(s) expressly provide(s) that Development of the Project or a portion thereof is directly dependent upon the performance of material obligations assumed by OWNER or a Development 713471.1 11/19/2002 28 Transferee, which material obligations have not been performed, the CITY may, in its reasonable discretion, withhold any permits and/or approvals, including, without limitation, certificates of occupancy, with respect to those directly dependent portions of the Project from OWNER and/or Development Transferee until such obligations have been substantially performed. 8.5 Estoppel Certificates. A party may at any time deliver written notice to the other party requesting an estoppel certificate (the "Estoppel Certificate"). A party receiving a request for an Estoppel Certificate shall provide a signed cerlificate to the requesting party within thirty (30) days after receipt of the request. The City Manager or any person designated by the City Manager may sign Estoppel Certificates on behalf of the CITY. Any officer or member of a private party may sign on behalf of that party. An Estoppel Certificate is intended to be relied on by assignees and mortgagees. If that one party requests an Estoppel Certificate from the other, the requesting party shall reimburse the other party for all reasonable and direct costs and fees incurred by such party with respect thereto. The Estoppel Certificate shall address issues such as whether: 8.5.1 The Agreement is in full force and effect and is a binding obligation of the parties. 8.5.2 The Agreement has been amended or modified either orally or in writing and, if so amended, identifying the amendments. 8.5.3 A default in the pertormance of the requesting party's obligations under the Agreement exists and, if a default does exist, the nature and amount of any default. 9. Waivers and Delays. 9.1 No Waiver. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, and failure by a party to exemise its rights upon a default by the other party hereto, shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to demand strict compliance by such other party in the future. 9.2 Third Parties. Non-performance shall not be excused because of a failure of a third person, except as provided in Sections 9.3 or 9.4. 9.3 Force Maieure. A party shall not be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by floods, earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, strikes and other labor difficulties beyond that party's control, action or inaction by the CITY, which ac{ions or inactions are breaches of any term of this Agreement, judicial decisions, or litigation regarding the Development Plan Approval(s) or Future Development Approvals or other similar events. 713471.1 I 1/19/2002 29 9.4 Extensions. The Term of this Agreement and the time for performance by a party of any of its obligations hereunder or pursuant to the other Development Plan Approval(s) shall be extended by the actual period of time that any of the events described in Section 9.3 exist and/or prevent performance of such obligations. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the performance by CITY of its obligations shall not be delayed or extended by the action or inaction of the CITY. 9.5 Notice of Delay. OWNER shall give prompt notice to the CiTY of any delay which OWNER anticipates or believes to have occurred as a result of the occurrence of any of the events described in Sections 9.3 or 9.4. In no event, however, shall notice of a delay of any length be given later than thirty days after the end of the delay or ten (10) days before the end of the Term (unless the cause of the delay arises during that time), whichever comes first. 10. Notices. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in wdting and delivered in person, sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested or by Federal Express or other similar nationwide overnight delivery service. Notices required to be given to the CITY shall be addressed as follows: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Planning Director With a copy to: Richards, Watson & Gershon Thirty-Eighth Floor 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071-1469 Attention: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Notices required to be given to OWNER shall be addressed as follows: Ashby USA, LLC USA Properties 470 E. Harrison Street Corona, CA 92879 Attention: Richard Ashby With a copy to: Cox, Castle & Nicholson, LLP 713471.1 11/19/2002 30 19800 MacArlhur Boulevard, Suite 600 Irvine, CA 92612-2435 Attn: Deborah Rosenthal, Esq. Any notice given as required by Section 10 shall be deemed given only if in writing and upon delivery as provided for in this Section 10. A party may change its address for notices by giving notice in writing to the other party as required by this Section 10 and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. 11. Attorneys' Fees. If legal action is brought by any party against another for breach of this Agreement, including actions derivative from the performance of this Agreement, or to compel performance under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of its costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, and shall also be entitled to recover its contribution for the costs of the referee referred to in Section 8.4 above as an ilem of damage and/or recoverable costs. 12. Recordin,q. This Agreement and any amendment or cancellation hereto shall be recorded, at no cost to the CITY, in the Official Records of Riverside County by the City Clerk within the period required by Section 65868.5 of the Government Code. 13. Effect of Aqreement on Title. 13.1 Effect on Title. OWNER and the CITY agree that this Agreement shall not continue as an encumbrance against any portion of the Property as to which this Agreement has terminated or released. 13.2 Encumbrances and Lenders' Riqhts. The mortgagee of a mortgage or beneficiary of a deed of trust encumbering the Property, or any part thereof, and their successors and assigns shall, upon written request to CITY, be entitled to receive from CITY written notification of any default by OWNER of the performance of OWNER's obligations under the Agreement which has not been cured within the timeframe established in Section 8.1 hereof. 13.2.1 Notwithstanding OWNER's default, this Agreement shall not be terminated by CITY as to any mortgagee or beneficiary to whom notice is to be given and to which either or the following is true: (i) the mortgagee or beneficiary cures any default by OWNER involving the payment of money within ninety (90) days after receipt from CITY of the written notice of default; (ii) as to defaults requiring title or possession of the Property or any portion thereof to effectuate a cure: (i) the 713471.1 11/19/2002 31 mortgagee/beneficiary agrees in writing, within ninety (90) days after receipt from CiTY of the written notice of default, to perform the preportionate share of OWNER's obligations under this Agreement allocable to that part of the Preperty in which the mortgagee/beneficiary has an interest conditioned upon such mortgagee's/beneficiary's acquisition of the Preperty or portion thereof by foreclosure (including a trustee sale) or by a deed in lieu of foreclosure; (ii) the mortgagee/beneficiary commences foreclosure proceedings to reacquire title to the Property or applicable portion thereof within said ninety (90) days and thereafter diligently pursues such foreclosure to completion, and (iii) the mortgagee/beneficiary promptly and diligently commences to cure such Default after obtaining title or possession. 13.2.2 Notwithstanding Section 13.2.1 of this Agreement, if any mortgagee/beneficiary is prehibited from commencing or presecuting foreclosure or other appropriate preceedings including by any process of injunction issued by any court or by reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving OWNER, the times specified in Section 13.2.1 of this Agreement for commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other proceedings shall be extended for the period of the prohibition. 13.2.3 Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any existing or future mortgage or deed of trust on the Property made in good faith and for value. 14. Severablllty of Terms. If any term, prevision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenfomeable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby if the tribunal finds that the invalidity was not a material part of consideration for either Party the Agreement as a whole. If the tribunal finds that the invalidity was a material part of the consideration, this Agreement will terminate unless CITY and OWNER agree to amend this Agreement as provided for herein. Upon a termination arising from the application of this Section 14, each Party agrees the Specific Plan shall suspend as to all unpermitted development activity pending the CITY's determination regarding repeal or modification of the same. 15. Subsequent Amendment to Authorizin.q Statute. This Agreement has been entered into in reliance upon the previsions of the Development Agreement Legislation in effect as of the Agreement Date. Accordingly, subject to Seclion 3.2.2 above, to the extent that subsequent amendments to the Government Code would affect the previsions of this Agreement, such amendments shall not be applicable to this Agreement unless necessary for this Agreement to be enfomeable or required by law or unless this Agreement is modified pursuant to the provisions set forth in this Agreement.. 16. Rules of Construction and Miscellaneous Terms. 713471.1 11/19/2002 32 16.1 Interpretation and Governln,q Law. The language in all parts of this Agreement shall, in all cases, be construed as a whole and in accordance with its fair meaning. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The parties understand and agree that this Agreement is not intended to constitute, nor shall be construed to constitute, an impermissible attempt to contract away the legislative and governmental functions of the CITY, and in particular, the CITY's police powers. In this regard, the parties understand and agree that this Agreement shall not be deemed to constitute the surrender or abnegation of the CITY's governmental powers over the Property or any decision arising from the Agreement, directly or indirectly. 16.2 Section Headln.qs. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement. 16.3 Gender. The singular includes the plural; the masculine gender includes the feminine; "shall" is mandatory, "may" is permissive. 16.4 No Joint and Several Liability. No breach hereof by OWNER or Development Transferee shall constitute a breach by lhe non breaching party. Any remedy, obligation, or liability, including but not limited to the obligations to defend and indemnify the CITY, arising by reason of such breach shall be applicable solely to the party that committed the breach. However, the CITY shall send a copy of any notice of violation to all OWNERS and Development Transferee, including those not in breach. 16.5 Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing. No party shall do anything which shall have the intentional effect of harming or injuring the right of the other parties to receive the benefits provided for in this Agreement; each party shall refrain from doing anything intentionally which would render its performance under this Agreement impossible; and each party shall do everything which this Agreement contemplates that such party shall do in order to accomplish the objectives and purposes of this Agreement. 16.6 No Waiver of Vestinq. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as limiting or impairing any vested rights to proceed with the Development or use of the Properly arising independently from entitlements, including those approved for the Project, issued by the CITY or others prior to, concurrently with, or subsequent to the approval of this Agreement, Federal and State Constitutions, statutes, or decisional law. 16.7 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence regarding each provision of this Agreement of which time is an element. 16.8 Recitals. All Recitals set forth herein are incorporated in this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. 713471,1 11/19/2002 33 16.9 Entire Aqreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and the Agreement supersedes all previous negotiations, discussion and agreements between the parties, and no parol evidence of any prior or other agreement shall be permitted to contradict or vary the terms hereof. 17, Extension of Maps. In accordance with Government Code Section 66452.6(a), any tentative map which relates to all or a portion of the Property shall be extended for the greater of (i) the Term of the Agreement or (ii) expiration of the tentative map pursuant to Section 66452.6. 18. Not for Benefit of Third Parties. This Agreement and all provisions hereof are for the exclusive benefit of the CITY and OWNER and its assignees pursuant to Section 2.5 and shall not be construed to benefit or be enforceable by any third party. 19. Attachments, The following attachments are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set out in the body of this Agreement. Attachments Description 2. 3, 4. 5. 6. Legal Description of the Property Plat of Ihe Property Described in Attachment 1 Zoning District Development Standards Existing Regulations Off-Site Improvements Selected On-Site Improvements 20. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year dated below. Dated:. ,2002 "CITY" CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation By: Name: Title: Mayor A']-I'EST: 71347t.t 11/19/2002 34 City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Dated: ,2002 "OWNER" ,a By:. Name: Title: State of California ) ) ss County of Riverside ) On before me, , personally appeared , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the inslrument. Witness my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary State of California ) ) ss County of Riverside ) 713471.1 11/19/2002 35 On before me, . personally appeared , personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(les), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument lhe person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. Signature of Notary 713471.1 11/19/2002 36 ATTACHMENT "1" (Legal Description of the Property) 713471.1 11/19/2002 37 ORD.' NO. R-192289-4 THE LA~ Ra~ED TO IN THIS P,~RT IS SI'ITIAI~3 IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ~ OF ~IDE ~ IS DES(~T~k'~ AS FOLLOWS: PARC~. A: THAT FORTIC~ OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUI~, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BSP/qARDISD BASE AI~ MER/DIAN, SHOWN AS "NOT A PART" ON PAROEI, MAP ON FILE BOOK 1, PAGE 44 OF PARC~. MAPS, REODRDS OF R/VERSIDE (I/ArfY, CALIFORNIA, DESCPT~k-D AS FOLLOWS: B~II~ AT A FOI1Ff ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID "NOT A PART" SOUTH 0~ 33' 55" WEST, 974.13 ~'".'".'l' FRCM THE NDR'Fr/EAST O2~ TH~R~0F; TH~CE NORTH 89° 26' 05" WEST, 771.64 ~'.:.:l' p/~T,T.R"L WI'~{ 'I~ S(~ L]11E OF SA]I) "NOT A PART" TO A FOI1Ff ON THE EAST LINE OF THE ~'*~FOLITAN WAT~ DISTRICT RIGHT-OF-~AY SOUTH 12° 32' 02" WEST 1004.04 k'w.~,'l' FRCM THE NORT~ COR/~ER OF SA/I) "NOT A PART"; TH~ SC~ 12° 32' 02" WEST, 278.15 ~'~:~r CN SAID EAST ~4EII<OPOLI~ 14kl~i~ DIb~I~-ICT LINE; q/~ SO~ 89° 26' 05" EAST, 829.32 ~.~l. pAp~I,rRL WITH SA/D SOUTH L]/~E TO A FO//Ff C~ THE EAST L]i~E OF SAID "NOT A PART" SOUTH 0° 33' 55" WEST, 1246.24 ~'".'".'l' FRC~ SAID NOIrU6EAST (DRNER; TH~ I~ 0° 33' 55" EAST, 272.11 ~'.:~,'r ON SAID EAST LIllE TO %~HE POINT OF B~GINN~k~. PARC~. B: THAT PORTION OF THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 20, TOgA~SHIP 7 SOUF6, ~ 2 WEST, SAN B~]I~D BASE Ai~ MER/DIAN, ACODRDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THER~F, S~ AS ',NOT A PART" AS PER MAP P,~ED IN BOOK 1, PA~ 44, 45 AI~ 46 OF PARCEL MAPS, ~ THE OFFICE OF TH~ O~ RECORDER OF SAID C~, DESC~ AS FOLLCN$: B~II~ AT A FOINT ON THE EAST LI~ OF SAID "NOT A PART" SOUTH 0° 33' 55" WEST, 1,246.24 ~'~'1' FRCM THE NORTHEAb-i~(LY O0RN~ OF SAID "NOT A PART"; THENCE C~ S(~ 0° 33' 55" WEST AL~ SAID EA~i~m~LY LINE 375.50 ~'~l' TO A 10IN-E; ~ NC~TH 89~ 26' 05" WEST 904 ~'..'.:r, ~DRE OR LINE OF IASD ~ TO THE ~0POLi~/~N kma~u~ DI~IKICT OF SOUI'6ERN CALIFORNIA BY D.:.~ RECORD~) APRIL 24, 1968, AS IN~ll{L~ NO. 37774, OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID REALTY BY D.:.:~ RECORDED 0CIOB~R 21, 1971, AS II~STR~ NO. 120094, OFFICIAL R.~RDS; '1~ ALC~ SAID EAb-i~LY LINE NOI~ 12° 32' 02" EAST (P~SD NORTH 12° 34' 14" EAST) 383.24 ~'~r TO A POINT THAT IS SOUIH 12o 32' 02" WEST (OF REO~RD SC~ 12° 34' 14" WEST) 1,282.19 ~'~1' FR~ 'i/qE NOi~ CORN~ OF SAID "NOT A PART"; ~ SOUTH 89° 26' 05" EAST 829.32 ~'~m~l', MgRE OR LF. qS, TO THE POE~T OF PARC~-~, C: THAT P0RTIC~ OF THAT C~KULIN pARO~r. OF LAND DEL]/qE~±~D ASD DESI(~ZuTED "NOT A PART" ON A MAP FIr.k'~ IN BOOK 1, PAGE 44 OF PARC~, MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE P, SEDRDER OF RIVERSIDE ~ BEING A PORTION OF THE FAST HALF OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, ~ 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AI~ MERIDIAN, DESCRI~ AS (Ii~r~NU~D ORD~RN0. R-192289-4 C~ AT T~E NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUIH HALF OF THE NORTH IU~LF OF SA~D SEci';flq 20 AS ~ CN PARCEL MAP IN BOOK 1, PAGE 44; ~ AL~ THE EAST L]/~E OF SAID SECTIC/q S(X/FH 0° 33' 55" WEST, 1,621.74 ~'.:.:1' TO THE TRUE POINT OF B~IAI~iAI~; TH~CE O~ SOUTH 0° 33' 55" WEST, 98.5 ~'~.'~.'l'; TH~IgC~ NORTH 89° 26' 05" WEST 928 ~2~r, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAb-±~iLY LINE OF LAND (/1NVEYED TO THE ~4~lKOPO~ ~A~k DISTRICT OF ~ CALIFORNIA BY DE~D REODRD~D APRIL 24, 1968, AS INb'lKt~gT NO. 37774, OF OFFICIAL REfI)P/~; TH~X2E ALONG SAID EAb~I~/{LY LINE NOR'IH 12° 32' 02" EAST, (REOORD~D NOR'i~{ 12° 34~ 14" EAST) 100 ~'~:".'f, MORE C/~ T,W. qS, TO ~ INI~HS~g~I'IC~q C/~ A LINE BEAP/NS NORTH 89° 26' 05" WEST FRCM THE TRUE POIArf OF B~3Ii~qIN~; ~ SOUTH 890 26' 05" EAST 904 ~'~:,.'r, MORE OR T.F. qS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEgINNINg. PA~. D: THE NOK'i/4 HALF OF ~ NORTH ~ OF SECTIC/q 20, TOWNS}tIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE A~ ~R_IDIAN, THE CITY OF T~, (~ OF P~IDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDIN~ TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEP, EOF. A STRIP OF LASI) 70 ~'~m~i' W~DE IN THE NORTH HALF OF THE NOR~/~I ~ALF OF SECTION 20, TC~P 7 SOUTH, ~ 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDIN0 BASE A~D ~RIDIAN, AOiDRDIN~ TO UNl'i~ STA~ (~ SURVEY APP~ ~'~UARY 18, 1860, SA2I) STRIP OF LAI~D 70 F~'r WIDE LYING 17.5 ~'~-'~-'l' SiXtY /~ 52.5 ~'~J~.' NOR'~"I~I~LY, ~ AT PI(HiT ANCO.W-q, FRCM THE FOI//IWING DESCRIBED SURVEY LII~: BE~II~ A~ A PO]]qT C/q THE NORTH LINE OF ~ S~ 20 DI~ ~ ~ 88° 36' 09" ~, 211.47 ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ OF ~ S~ 20, ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ IS p~l.L~. ~ ~ 17.5 W~l' ~'1~Y, ~ AT ~ ~, ~ ~ ~'l~Y ~ OF ~ P~ ~, 50 ~'f ~E, ~ ~ ~ ~1~O~ ~ DIHI~IC OF ~ ~~ ~ D~ ~ ~ 7, 1960, ~ ~K 2649, P~ 317, OF O~IC~ ~, ~E ~ ~; ~ ~l'~ ~ A ~ P~r.r.~. WI'~H ~ 17.5 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~DI~: ~ 20° 14' 43" ~, 664.24 ~'r; ~ 12° 34' 14" ~, 703.83 ~'~1' ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OF ~~OF~~ OF S~20 DI~~~ 830 35' 26" ~, 581.31 ~'r ~ ~ ~ ~ OF ~ ~ ~ ~ OF ~ ~ ~ OF S~'~ 20. ~ S~E L~ OF ~D~ 70 ~E ~POF ~ ~ BE ~O~ OR ~ ~ ~ ~ T~ ~Y ~ ~Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L~, ~rl~Y, OF ~ ~ ~ ~ OF ~ ~ ~ OF ~ S~l~ 20. PAR~ E: SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUI~, RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNA~DINO BASE ~ ~/i~IDIA~;, IN THE C1'~I{ OF T~l~SXJ3iA, ~ OF R/VERSEDE, SqI~TE OF CALIFORIqIA, ACfDRDIAI~ TO THE OFFI~ PLAT THEREOF. ATTACHMENT "2" (Plat of the Property Described In Attachment 1) 713471.1 11/19/2002 38 ATI'ACHMENT "3" (Zoning District Development Standards) 713471.1 11/19/2002 39 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.1 PURPOSE ANDINTENT The zoning for the Specific Plan area is Specific Plan Overlay. This section of the Specific Plan establishes zoning districts and land use regulations and standards that will control land use and development in the land uses identified for the Specific Plan area. These regulations amend and supersede the regulations of the Temecula Development Code. Where standards and regulations are not specified in this Specific Plan, the requirements of the Temecula Development Code shall provide the regulatory authority. This section also identities the procedures to be used to review site plans for development projects proposed within the Specific Plan area. Special standards for residential development are also included here. The Site Planning and Amhitactural Design Guidelines in Section 4.0 are intended to be used in conjunction with the zoning and development standards stated here. The following standards will serve as the primary mechanism for implementation of the land uses for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. These regulations provide an appropriate amount of flexibility to anticipate future needs end to achieve compatibility between land uses. Principal land uses for the Specific Plan shall be as follows: Residential Land Uses: · Low Density (L) Single-Family Detached: (PA 10, 19, 20, 21,33A and 33B) · Low Medium (LM) Density Single-Family Detached: (PA 1A-4B, 16 - 18) · Medium (M1) Density Single-Family Detached: (PA 23 and 24) · Medium (M2) Density Single-Family Detached and Attached clustered: (PA 12, 14, 15, 22 and 31) 2. Commemial: · Neighborhood Commemial: (PA 11) Parks and Open Space: · Private Recreation Centers {PA 5, 30) · Private Mini-Park (PA lB) · Parks (PA 6, 27) · Open Space · Habitat (OS1): (PA 8, 9A, 9B, and 13) · Flood Control (OS2): (PA 7B, 7C, 25, 26, and portions of 14 and 27) · Landscape Slope (OS3): (PA 7A and portion of 6) 4. Elementary and Middle School: (PA: 28 and 29) 5. Fire Station: (PA 32) RodFmu~h Ranch Specific Plan 5-1 C:tDOCUMENTS AND S ETTIN G S~IAASE HS~LOCAL SETTINGS\TEM P~PSECT5CC DOCUMENT. DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS This section of the development regulations states the general rules that must be observed by all development projects in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. These regulations apply to all planning areas within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, unless otherwise specified. 1. Roripaugh Ranch Site Planning and Architectural Design Guidelines All development within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area is subject to the policy provisions of the Site Planning (Section 4.0) and Architectural Design Guidelines (Section 4.0) adopted by ordinance of the Temecula City Council. The Design Guidelines in conjunction with the devalopment standards contained in this Specific Plan and those o! the Temecula Development Code shall regulale development within the Specific Plan area. The Design Guidelines will be administered through the City of Temecula Planning Department. All development within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area shall be subject to the Development Standards in this section of the Specific Plan. 2. Code Compliance All construction and development within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area shall comply with applicable provisions of the Specific Plan, the Uniform Building Cede and the various related mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire cedes, water ordinance, grading and excavation codes and subdivision cedes, in effect in the City of Temecula at the time grading/building permits are obtained. 3. Setback Requirements The setback requirements are as specified within the standards identified in the plan for each zoning district. If not otherwise specified, all setbacks shall be determined as the perpendicular distance from the existing or planned street right-of-way line or property line, to the foundation point of the closest structure. 4. Exceptions If specific development standards have not been established or if an issue, condition or situation arises or occurs that is not clearly understandable in the Specific Plan, then those regulations and standards of the City of Temecula Development Cede that are applicable for the most similar use, condition or situation shall apply as determined by the Community Development Director. Enforcement Enforcement of the provisions herein shall be in the manner specified in the Temecula Municipal Cede for zoning enforcement. 6. Unspecified Uses Whenever a use has not specifically been listed as being a permitted use in a particular zone classification within the Specific Plan, it shall be the duty of the Planning Director to determine if said use is: (1) consistent with the intent of the zone; and (2) compatible with other listed permitted uses. Any person aggrieved by the decision may appeal to the Planning Commission. Rodpau~h Ranch Specific Plan 5-2 C:!DOCUMENTS AND $ ETTI N G S'~NAASEH S~LOCAL SETTING S~TEMF~SPSECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PI.AN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan provides a mix of diverse housing products, including five different housing types that fall within three of the City's General Plan residential designations: Temecula General Plan Specific Plan Desl¢lnatlon Residential Desl.qnation L (20,000 sq. ft.) Single-Family (1-2 du/ac) LM (5,000 and 6,000) Single-Family (2-5 du/ac) (Min. 5,000 sf lot size) M1 and M2 (4,000 and NA) Single-Family (7-12 du/ac) Min. (standard) 4,000 sf lot size Min. (clustered) 3,000 sf lot size lot detached Low Density Residential Single-Family (.5-2 du/ac) Low Medium Density Residential Single-Family (3-6 du/ac) Medium Density Residential Single-Family (7-12 du/ac) Rodpau~jh Ranch Spedflc Plan 5-3 C:*~DOCUMENTS AND S ETrlN GSU'~AAS EH S~OCAL SET] iNGS\TEMP~ PSECT5CCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.1 DESCRIPTION OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 10, 19, 20, 21, 33A AND 33B The Low Density Residential (L) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single- family detached homes on large lots with a unique character of development. Typical let sizes in the L zoning district will be a minimum of 20,000 square feet with 1 acre minimum lots along the exterior perimeter of Planning Areas 19, 20, 21, and 33A. Private equestrian use will only be allowed on lots one acre or larger adjacent to the multi-use trail in Planning Areas 19, 20, 21. Planning Area 33B shall not be developed as a part of Roripaugh Ranch. This planning area shall eventually be combined with the adjacent residential areas to the north. LOW MEDIUM DENSITY (LM) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. lA, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 16, 17and 18 The Low Medium (LM) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single-family homes on lots of 5,000 square feet to 6,000 square feet, Planning Areas 1,2, 3, 4A, 4B, and 16 shall have a minimum lot size of 5,000 sq, It. Planning Areas 17 and 18 shall have a minimum lot size of 6,000 sq. ft. MEDIUM DENSITY - STANDARD (M1) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 23 AND 24 The Medium (M) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single-family homes on lots 4,000 minimum square feet. MEDIUM DENSITY - CLUSTERED (M2) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 12, 14, 15, 22 AND 31 The Medium (M) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of clustered single-family development on minimum lot sizes of 3,000 sq. ff. Rodpaugh Ranch Specilic Plan 5-4 C:'~DOCUM ENTS AND S ETTINGS~IAASEHS~OCAL SET'RNG S'~TEMP~SPSECT5CCDOCUMENT,DOC November. 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.2 USE REGULATIONS The list of land uses in the following table shall be permitted in one or more of the residential zoning districts as indicated in the columns corresponding to each residential zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated with a '-", the use is prohibited within the zone. Where indicated with a letter "C", the use shall be conditionally permilted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. Table 5.1 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Residential Distrl=ts Description of Use IL I LM M1 I M2 Single-family detached P P P Single-family attached P Single-family zero lot line P P Single.family attached greater than two units Multiple family Manufactured homes P P P P Mobilehome park Facilities for the mentally disordere<], handicapped, or dependent or P P P P neglected children (six or fewer) Facilities for the mentally disordered, handicapped, or dependent or neglected chltdmn (seven to twelve) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or fewer) P P P P Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (seven or more) Residential care facilities for the eldedy (six or fewer) P P P P Residential cam facilities for the elderty (seven or more) Congregate care residential facilities for the eldedy Boarding, rooming and lodging lacilities Secondary dwelling units as delined by City Development Code P P Granny Fiat P P Family day care hemes-small (four or fewer) P P P P Family day care homes-large~ C C Day care centers C C Bed and breakfast establishments Emergency shelters Transitional housing Nonresidential Roripaugh Ranch Spaniflc Plan 5-5 C:~DOCUMENTS AND S ETTIN GS'~NAAS EHS~.OC AL SETTtNG$\TEMP~SPSECTSCCDOCU MENT. DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Description of Use I L ILM M11 M2 Agricultural/open space uses Religious institutionss C C C C Utility facilities C C C C Educational institutions Public libraries Public museurcs and art galleries (not for profit) Kennels and cattedes Non commercial keeping of horses P4 Temporary real estate tract offices P P P P Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards Parking for commercial uses Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls Convalescent facilities Golf Courses Home occupations P P P P Construction Trailers3 P P P P 1. A CUP processed for large family day care homes is subject to Hearih and Safety Code Section 1597,46(a)(3). In accordance therewith, notice of the application being filed shall be mailed lo surrounding property owners within one hundred feet only and the notice shall indicate thai unless a request for a hearing is roada by such sunx)unding property owner or other "affected person", the CUP will issue within twenty days of the notice, ff a hearing is requested, the planning deda~lnnenl shall schedule such hearing within thirty days of the request and the hearing shall be held within thirty days o! being scheduled. 2. Allowed only within a single-family residence. 3. The Planning Director shall have the discretion to waive submittal of an Administral[ve Development Plan if it is determined that the construction Irailer will not have an adverse impact on edjacant reeldencas or businesses. 4. The keeping of homes shell only he permitted in Planning Areas 19, 20 and 21 on lots abutting the ro[Jfii-use trail. No more than two (2] horses and one (1) offspting up to six (6) months of age may be kept on each one acre lot. All homes shall be kept in a slal[/corsl (12' x 12' ter each horse) located a mlnimuro distance of r~y (50) feet from neighboring dwellings, ten (10) feet from the main dwelling on the lot and ten (10) feet from the side or rear property line. 5. Religious Institutions 8hail not be p~rrnitted in Planning Area. s lA, 2, 3, 4A ~[nd 4B Roripaugh Ranc~ Specific Plan 5-6 C:~DOCUM ENTS AND S E'CI'~NGS'~'~,A$ E H S~LOCAL S ETTINGS\TEMP~SPSECT5CCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS In the Low (L), Low Medium (LM) and Medium (M) Zones are as follows: Table 5-2 Development Standards - Residential Districts Residential Development L LM LM M1 M2 Standards 20,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 (Minimum Lot Size In Feet) Planning Area 10, 19, 20, lA, 2, 3, 17 and 18 23 and 24 12, 14, 15, 22 21, 33A 4A, 4B end 31 and 33B and 16 Minimum gross lot area 20,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 3,000 (square feet) 1 acre' -* Lots in PA 19, 20 and 21 that abut eastern ~nd southern properly boundary shall be a minimum of I acre. Thidy (30) foot fuel modification zone shall not be included in lot area. Dwelling unils per net acre 1.2 da/ac 5.2 du/ac 4.0 du/ac 6.1 du/ac 10.1 du/ac Minimum lot frontage at 30 ft, 25 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. NA front property line Minimum lot frontage for a 25 ft. 20 ft. 20 ff. 20 ft. NA flag lot at front property line Minimum width at required 50 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft, NA front yard setback area Minimum lot width 60 ft.* 40 ft. 40 ft. 40 ff. 40 fl. * For both 20,000 sq. ft. lots and 1 acre lots shall be substantially the same. Minimum lot deplh go ft. 80 ft, 80 ft. 80 ft. NA Minimum front yard setback 25 ft. 10 ft 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. - Front entr~ garages 18 It. 18 ft. 18 fl, 18 ft. 18 ft. - Side entry garages 10 lt. 10 ft. 10 lt. 10 ft. 10 lt, - Lots abutting Mun'ieta Hot Springs between Pourroy Rd. and the M~ND easement may be reduced by three (3) feet. Minimum comer side yard 15 lt. 10 lt. 10 ff. 10 rt. 10 ft. setback Setbacks for lots abutting Murrieta Hot Springs between Pourroy Rd. and the MWD easement may be reduced by three (3) feet. 'Minimum interior side yard 10 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 it. setback Roril~au~h Ranch Specific Plan 5-7 C:'~DOCUMENTS AND $ ETTINGS~NAAS EHS~OCA L SI= 11 lNG S~TEMI=~SP$ ECTSCCDOCU M ENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Table 5-2 Development Standards - Residential Districts Residential Development L LM LM M (Standard) M Standards 20,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 (Clustered) (Minimum Lot 61~e in Feet) Minimum rear yard setback 20lt. 20lt. 2Oft. 15lt. 15ft. - Setbacks for lots abutting 25 It. Planning Area 7A along the southern property line shall have a 25' minimum rear yard setback. - Lots abutting Multi-use trail in 50 ff. PA 19, 20 and 21, - Setbacks for lots abutting Murrieta Hot Springs between Pourroy Rd. and the MWD easement may be reduced by staff by three (3) feet. Planning Area 10, 19, 20, 1, 2, 3, 17 and 18 23 and 24 12, 14, 15, 22 21, 33A 4A, 4B and 31 and 33B and 16 Maximum height 2 2 stories, 2 2 2 ½ 2 ½ 2 V~ 35 feet stories, 35 stories, 35 stories, 35 stories, 35 feet feet feet feet Maximum percentage of lot 50% 60% 60% 60% 60% coverage Minimum Garage Size 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' (~tedor space) ° Fireplaces may project not mere than two (2) feet into the side yard setback provided the width of the fireplace does not exceed eight (8) feet in width. Rodpaugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-8 C:tDOCUMENTS AND S ETTI N G S'u'~AASEH S~I. OCAL SETTINGS\TEMP~SPSECT5CC DOCUMENT. DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.4 5.4.1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (PLANNING AREA 11) DESCRIPTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL Neighborhood Commercial (Planning Ama No. t 1), will include a variety of different types of land uses. Uses within this planning area include smaller-scale business activities which generally provide retail and/or convenience services for msidants within Roripaugh Ranch. The following am site planning guidelines relating to Planning Ama No. 11, 5.4.2 USE REGULATIONS The list of land uses in the following table shall be permitted in the neighborhood commemial zoning dislrict. Where indicated with a letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone. Where indicated with a letter"C", the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a condilional use permit. Table 5-3 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Neighborhood Commercial Center (PA-11) Description of Usa I NC A Adult business subject ta Chapter 5.08 of the Temecu]a Municipal Code Aerobics/dance/gymnastic~azzemise/martial arts studios (less than 5,000 sq. ft. P Aerobics/dancelgymnastic~azzeroise/martial arts studios (greater than 5,000 sq. It. P AIcohollsrc or drug treatment facilities Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient) Alcoholic beverage sales C Ambulance services Animal hospital/shelter Antique restoration Antique sales (Less than 5,000 sq. ft.} P Apparel and accesso~ shops P Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P Arcades (pinball and video games) Art supply stores P Auction houses Auditoriums and conference facilities C Automobile dealers (new and used) Automobile salss (brokerage)- showroom only (new and used)-no outdoor display Autorcobile repair sen/ices Automobile rental Rorlpaugh Ranch Specific Pla~ 5-9 C:~OCUMENTS AND SET'n NGS~NAA$ EH S~.OCAL SETTINGS\TEMF~SP$ ECT5CCDOCUM ENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Automobile painting and body shop Automobile service stations with alcoholic sales Automotive service stations (not selling beer and/or wine) with or without an automated P car wash Automobite parts-sales C Automobile oil change/lube services with no major repair C B Bakery goods distribution Bakery retail P Bakery Wholesale Banks and linancial institutions P Barber and beauty shops P Bed and breaktast Bicycle (sales, rentaJs, services) P Billiard parior/poolhall Binding of books and similar publications Blood bank P Blueprint and duplicating and copy services P Bookstores P Building materials sales (with the exterior storage/sales areas greater than 50 percent O! total sales area) Building materials sales (with the extedor storage/sales areas greater than 50 pement of total sales area) Butcher shop P C Cabinet shop Cabinet shops under 20,000 sq. it.- no outdoor storage Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) P Candy/confectionery sales P Car wash, full service/salt se~vica Caq)et and rug cleaning Catedng services P Clothing sales P Coins, purchase and sales P Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-10 C:',DOCUMENT$ AND SETTINGS~IAASEHS~OCAL $1ETTINGS~TEMFASPSECT5CCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Communications and microwave installations ' Communications equipment sales~ C Community care facilities C Computer sales and sewices P Congregate care housing for the eldedy 2 C Construction equipment sales, se~[ces or renlal Contractor's equipment, sales, service er rental Convenience market Costume rentals P Crematoriums Cutlery P D Data processing equipment and systems Day care centers P Delicatessen P Discounl/department store P Distribution facility Drug store/pharmacy P D~y cleaners P Dry cleaning plant E Emergency shelter Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) P Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage) F Feed and grain sales Financial, insurance, mai estate offices P Fire and police stations P Floor covering sales P Florist shop P Food processing Fotlunetelling, spiritualism, or similar activity P Freight terminals Ro~i~ugh Ranch specific Plan 5-11 C:~DOCUMENTS AND SE'r'J'ING~AASEHS~_OCAL SET'rINGS\TEMP',.SPSECT5CCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Fuel storage and distribution Funeral parlors, mortuary Furniture sales (Less than 10,000 sq. ft.) P Furniture transfer and storage G Garden supplies and equipmenl sales and service Gas distribution, meter and control station General memhandisa/retail stores less than 10,000 sq. ft. P Glass and mirrors, retail sales P Government offices P Grocery store, retail P Grocery store, wholesale Gunsandfirearmsales H Hardware stores P Health and exercise club P Health food store P Health care facility P Heliport Hobby supply shop P Home and business maintenance se~lce Hospitals Hotels/mole!s I Ice cream parlor P Impound yard Interior decorating service P J Junk or salvage yard K Kennel Rorlp~ugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-12 C:',DOCUM ENTS AND S ETTIN GS~IAASE HS~.OCAL SETrlNGS\TEMP~SPSECT5CCDOCU MENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE L Laboratories. film, medical, resaamh or testing cantata Laundromat P Laundry service (commemial) Libraries, museums, and galleries (private) C Liquid petroleum, sales and distribution Uquor stores C Lithographic service Locksmith P M Machine shop Machinery storage yard Mail order business Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to the following: Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods, within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry, furniture, art objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes which do nor involve frequent truck traffic. Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, end warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or semi-refined products requiring further processing and manufacturing, and outside storage. P Uses under 20,000 sq. It. with no outside storage Massage 3 p Medical equipment sales/rental P Membership clubs, organizations, lodges C Mini-storage or mini-warehouse facilities Mobilehome sales and services Motion picture studio Motorcycle sales and service Movie theaters C Musical end recording studio N Nightclubs~avems/bars/dance club/teen club Roripe, ugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-13 C:~DOCUMENTS AND S E'I'TIN G S~J~AAS EHS~.OC AL SET'rINGS\TEMP~SPSECTSCCDOCU MENT. DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Nurseries (retail) Nursing homes/convalescent homes C 0 Office equipment supplies, sales/services P Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq. ft, P Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate, insurance P Painl and wallpaper stores P Pamel delivery services Parking lets and parking structures C Pawnshop Personal service shops p Peat control services Pet grooming/pet shop P Photographic studio P Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) Postal distribution Postal sen'ices P Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.,) Privale utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) P Q Reserved R Radio and broadcasting studios, offices Radio/television transmitter Recreational vehicle parks Recreational vehicle sales Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building Recycling collection facilities P Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan 5-14 C:~DOCUMENTS AND S ETTI NG S'd~IAA $ E HS~L OCAL St: ~ I~NGS~TEMP~SPSECT5CCDOCUMENT.DOC November. 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Recycling pmsessing facilities Religious institution, without a daycare or private school C Religious institution, with a private school C Religious institution, with a daycare C Restaurant, drive-in/fast food C Restaurants and other eating establishments P Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment C Rooming and boarding houses S Scale, public Schools, business and professional C Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12) C Scientific research and development offices and laboratories Solid waste disposal facility Sports and recreational facilities C Swap meet, entirely inside a permanent building Swap meet, outdoor Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales P T Tailor shop P Taxi or limousine service Tire sales Tobacco shop P Tool and die casting Transfer, moving and storage Transportation terminals and stations C Truck sales/rentals/service TV/VCR repair P Upholste~ shop / Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan 5-15 November, 2002 C:U3OCUMENTS AND SETTINGS',NA~SEHS~OCAL SETTINGS~TEMI~SPSECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE V Vending machine sales and services W Warehousing/distribution Watch repair P Wedding chapels Welding shop Welding supply and service (enclosed) Y Reserved I Z Reserved t. Subject lo the provisions contained in Section 17.40 of the City ol Temenula Development Code 2. Subject to Ihe provisions contained in Section 17.06.050.H of the City of Temecula Development 3. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 5.22 of the City of Temenula Municipal Code Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan 5-16 C:~DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS~NAASEHS~OCAL SETTING S\TEMP~SPSECTSCCDOCU MENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.4.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following standards of development shall apply in the Neighborhood Commemlah Table 5-4 Development Standards - Neighborhood Commercial (Commercial Uses - PA 11) Minimum gross area for site 2 acres for common lot centers, 30,000 square feet for single lots Target fleer area ratio .3 Maximum §ear area ratio with intensity bonus as per Section .50 17.08.050 Front yard adjacent to street: - Buttedield Stage Road/Murrieta Hot Springs Road 20 feet; structure & parkfng - "A" and "B" Street 20 feet, structure & parking Yard adjacent to residentially zoned property 25 feet, structure & parking Accessory structure side/rear yard setback 10 feet Minimum building separation: o One story: 10 feet - Two stories: 15 feet - Three stodes or more: 20 feet Maximum building height 50 feet Maximum percent of lot coverage 30% Minimum required landscaped open space 20% Fence, wall or hedge screening outdoor storage maximum height 6 feet Minimum building setback separation: - Two stories: 15 feet - Three stories or more: 20 feet Rodp;[u~h Ranch specific Plan 5-17 C?OOCUMENTS AND SETTINGb-~NAAS EHS~.OCAL SE~I'INGS~TEMP~SPS ECTSCCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.5 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE (Planning Areas Nos. lB, 5, 6, 7A, 7B, 7C, 8, 9A, 9S, 13, 27, 25, 26 and 30) 5.5.1 DESCRIPTION OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Parks (P) and Open Space (OS) zoning distdct is intended to promote a wide range of public and private recreational uses in the community. These uses include community facilities, golf courses, health clubs, public parks and recreation areas, sports parks, or other outdoor athletic facilities and similar outdoor commercial recreational uses. 5.5.2 USE REGULATIONS The Iisi of land uses in the following table shall be permitted in one or more of the park and open space zoning distdct as indicated in the columns corresponding to each zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "P", the use shall be a perm;fled use. Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone. Where indicated with a letter "C', the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. Table 5-$ Schedule of Permitted Uses - Parka and Recreational Uses p P OS~ OS= OSz Schedule of Uses (Private) (Public) lB, 5 6 and 27 8, 9A, 7B, 7C, Portions Planning Area and 30 9B, and 25 and of 6 and 13, 26 7A Agricultural Uses Athletic Field P P Bicycle paths P P P P Campground Caretakers quarters Cemeteries, mausoleums and related uses Game courts, badminton, tennis, racquetball P P Golf driving range not part of a golf course G01f course and cluhh0uso P P Government and public utility facilities C C P P Gymnasium p p Microwave antenna/towert Nature centers/exhibits Nursedea P P Group Picnic Facilities Private parks and recreation facilities p p p p Parking areas P P RoriF~au[~h Ranc/n Specific plan 5-18 C:'~DOCUNIENT$ AND SE'r'FI NGS~AAS EH S~.OCAI. SETTINGS~TEMF~SPSECTSCC DOCU MENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Public parks and recreational facilities P P P P Recreational vehicle park Riding stable, public or private Shooting galleries, ranges, amhe~y courses Single-family dwellings Tree Farms 1. See Zoning Appendix of Development Code 17.40 for antenna information. Roripau~jh Ranch Specific Plan 5-19 C:~DOCUMENTS AND S ETTIN GS~IAAS EH S'~LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMP~SPS ECT5CCDOC UMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.5.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS In the Parks and Open Space districts development standards ara as follows: Table 5-6 Development Standards - Parks and Open Space Standards Development Standards I P OS Planning Area 1 B, 5, 6, 27 and 7A, 7B, 7C, 8, 31 9A, 9B, 13, 25 and 26 Minimum lot size 10,000 sq. ft. Maximum Iol coverage 25% Maximum height 35 feet~ Floor araa ratio .1 Setback Irom parking structure 25 feet Setback from parking structure 25 feet Minimum open apace/landscaping 75% 100% 1. Excludes light poles and communication facilities. Rori~augh Ranch Specific Plan S-20 C:~DOCUMENTS AND SETTING$'u~IAASEHS~I.OCAL SETTING$\TEMFASPSECT5CCDOCUMENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.6 PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICTS (PLANNING AREAS 28 AND 29) 5.6.1 DESCRIPTION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT AND PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT The purpose of this district is to facilitate the construction of an Elementary School site and Middle School site. Planning Area 28 will be developed as a Middle School site and Planning Area 30 will be developed as an Elementary School site. 5.6.2 USE REGULATIONS Planning Areas 28 and 29 shall only be designated to be used as a Middle School site and an Elementary School site, respectively. Roripaugh Ram:h $~c Plan 5-21 C:~/)OCUM ENT$ AND S ETTINGS~IAAS EHS~OCAL SETTINGS\TEMP~SPSECT5CCDOCU MENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.7 PUBLIC INSTn'UTIONAL (PLANNING AREA 32) 5.7.1 DESCRIPTION OF PUBIJC iNSTITUTIONAL (FIRE STATION) The purpose of this district is to facilitate construction of pubUc and quasi-public uses in appropriate areas of lhe city. Planning Area 31 will be developed as a fire station on a 1.5 acre site. 5,7,2 USE REGULATIONS Planning Area 31 shall only be designated as a Fire Station, Roripaugh Ranch Specific p~n 5-22 C:'~DOCUMENTS AND SETTING S'~IAASEH S~LOC AL $ ETIrINGS\TEMP~SPSECT5CC DOCUM ENT.DOC November, 2002 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.8 PARKING REQUIREMENTS Refer to Chapter 17.24 of the City Developmenl Code for parking requirements. Rodpau~h Ranch Specific Plsn 5-23 C:',DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS~N AASEH S~LOCAL SETrlNG$\TEMP~SPSECT5CC DOCU MENT.DOC November, 2002 ATTACHMENT "4" (Existing Regulations) Attachment No. 4 2. 3. 4. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. EXISTING REGULATIONS City General Plan The Development Code (Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code) The Subdivision Ordinance (Title 16 of the Temecula Municipal Code) Citywide Design Guidelines Habitat Conservation Ordinance Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance Uniform Building Code, as locally adopted Uniform Fire Code, as locally adopted Standard Drawings for Public Works Construction 713471.1 11/19/2002 40 A'I'rACHMENT 5 ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The following shall be used to construct the improvements included in this Attachment: (a) All proposed road improvements shall include associated flood control, storm drain, water, and sewer lines; (b) All references to bridges shall mean hydro-arch bridges or other designs as approved by the City Engineer; (c) Full-width improvements shall consist of the complete street and landscape improvements with the right-of-way; (d) Half-width improvements shall consist of the construction of the improvements from curb to the raised landscaped median, the full-width raised landscaped median, where applicable, and a travel lane adjacent to the median on the unimproved half; (e) On center improvements shall mean a. A 38'width improvement consisting of two 14' travel lanes and a 10' turn lane, or b. A 40' width improvement consisting of two 14' travel lanes and a 12' turn lane. PHASE 1 (Planning Areas 1-4B, 6, and 32) Onsite Prior to issuance of the 34~ building permit, the following improvements shall be completed: Secondary Access - Provide secondary access for each Planning Area to Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Prior to issuance of the 10~h building permit or as otherwise specified in the Development Agreement, the following improvements shall be completed: Butterfield Stage Road - Construct half-width improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the south project boundary at Planning Area 32, including construction of two full-width bridges within and over Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash. 713471.1 11/19/2002 41 Butterfield Stage Road - Dedicate full-width right-of-way from the northern project boundary to Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Murrieta Hot Springs Road - Construct full-width improvements from east of Pourroy Road at the northern project boundary to the MiND pipeline property. Murrieta Hot Springs Road - Construct half-width improvements from the MWD pipeline property to Butterfield Stage Road. Nicolas Road - Offer a dedication for a 110' right-of-way from Butterfield Stage Road to the west project boundary. Nicolas Road - Construct northerly half-width plus 10 feet from Butterfield Stage Road to the western project boundary. South Loop Road - Construct southerly half-width in front of fire station (Planning Area 32). Pdor to issuance of the 40~h building permit, the following improvements shall be completed: "A' Street - Construct full-width from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road. 10. "B' Street - Construct full-width improvements from Nicolas Road to "A" Street. 11. North Loop Road - Construct a full-width bridge over and within Santa Gertrudis Creek and connect the bridge to Butterfield Stage Road with full width improvements. 12. Construct the following traffic signals and related intersection improvements: a. Pourroy Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Offsite Traffic signals may be required, as warranted, at the two other project entrances from Murriela Hot Springs Road located to the east and west of the Pourroy Road main project entrance. Prfor to the issuance of the 1~ building permit, the following improvements shall be completed: North General Kearney Road at Nicolas Road traffic signal with the ultimate lane configurations of: a. Northbound N General Kearney Rd: 1 Through Lane, I Right Turn Lane. b. Southbound N General Kearney Rd: 1 Shared Left, I Through lane, Right Turn Lane. 713471.1 11/19/2002 42 c. Eastbound Nicolas Rd: I Left Turn Lane, 2 Through Lanes, I Right Turn Lane. d. Westbound Nicolas Rd: 1 Left Turn Lane, 2 Through Lanes, 1 Right Turn Lane. These improvements aro in addition to the existing improvements and lane configurations and shall supplement not replace existing turning movements. Prior to the issuance of the 108~ building permit or as otherwise specified in the Development Agreement, the following improvements shall be completed: Nicolas Road - Construct 40' width on center improvements from the western project boundary to 450' east of the existing Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol intersection. Secondary Access - The required secondary access for the Plateau area shall be provided by one of the following options: a. If Nicolas Road is designated as the secondary access route, the following improvements shall be completed: i. Construct 40' width on canter improvements from 450 feet east of the existing Nicolas Road / Calle Girasol intersection to Liefer Road including the full width bridge structure over and within Santa Gertrudis Creek. ii. Realign existing Calle Girasol to its ultimate intersection with Nicolas Road including right-of-way acquisition. If Calle Chapos from Butterfield stage Road to Walcott Lane and Calle Girasol from Walcott Lane to the existing Nicolas Road / Calle Girasol intersection is designated as secondary access, the following improvements shall be completed: i. Calle Chapos from Butterfield Stage Road to Walcott Lane - Construct 38' width on center improvements to existing pavement. ii. Calle Girasol from Walcott Lane to the existing Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol intersection Construct 38' width on center improvements, as required by the City Fire Chief and City Engineer (including right-of-way acquisition and horizontal curve realignment), on Calle Girasol from Walcott Lane to the existing Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol intersection. If Butterfield Stage Road from the southern project boundary to Rancho California Road is designated as secondary access, construct half width improvements from the southern project boundary at Planning Area 32 to Rancho California Road, excluding any existing improvements. 4. The Developer shall contribute an undetermined percentage of the total construction costs for traffic signals for the lane improvements at Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Alta Murrieta in the City of Murrieta including improvements to be specified. The developer shall provide the City of Temecula with a letter from 713471.1 11/19/2002 43 the City of Murrieta stating that a fair share contribution to identified improvements at this intersection has been made. The Developer shall contribute 5.8% of the total construction costs for the traffic signal and additional improvements identified as: southbound left turn lane, southbound right turn lane, eastbound through lane, eastbound right turn lane, westbound through lane, and westbound free right turn lane at 1-215 Freeway (Southbound Ramps) at Murrieta Hot Springs Road. PHASE 2 (Planning Areas 10, 11, 12, 14.24, 27 - 31, 33A, and 33B) Prior to the issuance of any building permit in Phase 2, the following improvements must be completed: Onsite Butterfield Stage Road - Construct remaining half-width improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the south project boundary at Planning Area 32, including construction of two full-width bddges within and over Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash. Murrieta Hot Springs Road - Construct remaining haft-width improvements from the MWD pipeline property to Butte#laid Stage Road. North Loop Road - Construct full-width improvements from the bridge structure at North Loop Road/Santa Gertrudis Creek crossing to the Long Valley Wash Bridge structure at South Loop Road. South Loop Road - Construct the full width bridge structure crossing Long Valley Wash and construct full width street improvements from this bridge to Butterfield Stage Road. Nicolas Road - Construct remaining improvements from Butterfield Stage Road to western project boundary. o Offslte The developer shall construct the following traffic signals and related intersection improvements: a. Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Butlerfield Stage Road. b. Nicolas Road at Butterfield Stage Road. c. Calle Chapos at Buttedield Stage Road. Butterfield Stage Road - Construct full width improvements from the southern project boundary at Planning Area 32 to Rancho California Road excluding any existing improvements. 713471.1 11/19/2002 44 Nicolas Road - Construct 40' width improvements from 450 feet east of the existing Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol intersection to Liefer Road including the full width bridge structure over Santa Gertrudis Creek. Calle Girasol and the Nicolas Road / Calle Girasol intersection - Realign existing Calla Girasol to its ultimate intersection with Nicolas Road including right-of-way acquisition. Calla Chapos - Construct 38' width on center improvements from Buttedield Stage Road to the existing paved terminus at Walcott Lane. Winchester Road at Nicolas Road traffic signal to be constructed with the following ultimate lane configurations: Northbound Winchester: 2 Left Turn Lanes, 4 Through Lanes, 1 Free Right Turn Lane. Southbound Winchester: 2 Left Turn Lanes, 4 Through Lanes, 1 Right Turn Lane. Eastbound Nicolas Road: 1 Left Turn Lane, 1 Through Lane, 1 Right Turn Lane. Westbound Nicolas Road: 3 Left Turn Lanes, I Through Lane, 1 Right Turn Lane. These improvements are in addition to the existing improvements and lane configurations and shall suppleroent not replace existing turning movements. Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho California Road traffic signal with the ultimate lane configurations of: Northbound BSR: I Left Turn Lane, 2 Through Lanes Southbound BSR: 1 Left Turn Lane, 2 Through Lanes Eastbound RCR: 2 Left Tum Lanes, 2 Through Lanes Westbound RCR: 1 Left Turn Lane, 2 Through Lanes These improvements are in addition to the existing improvements and lane configurations and shall supplement not replace existing turning movements, The Developer shall contribute 11.1% of the total construction costs for traffic signals and northbound through lane, southbound through lane, and westbound through lane improvements at Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Winchester Road. The Developer shall contribute 12.4% of the total construction costs for traffic signal and northbound shared left-through lane, eastbound through lane, and westbound through lane for Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Margarita Road. 713471.1 11119/2002 45 DEFIlqITIONS GENERAL PROVISIONS Binding Covenants Interest of OWNER Term Termination Transfers and Assignments DEVELOPMENT PROVISIONS Vesting Reserved Authority Further Assurances to OWNER Regarding Exercise of Reserved Authority Consistent and Inconsistent Enactments Amendment of Development Agreement Future Amendments to Development Plan Approval(s) Future Development Approvals OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES. FEE AND EXACTION RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS Public Facility Financing. Plan Related Real Property Conveyances; Conditions to Development Agreement INDEMNIFICATION RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES PERIODIC REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE WITH AGRg. gME~ Periodic Review Good Faith Compliance Failure to Conduct Annual Review Initiation of Review by City Council Administration of Agreement Availability of Documents EVENTS OF DEFAULT: REMEDIES AND TERMINATION Defaults by OWNER Defaults by CITY 713471.1 I 1/19/2002 46 4 7 7 7 7 8 8 10 10 13 14 14 16 17 18 18 18 25__~ 26__ 2._~7~8 27__~ 27~-2-8 27.._~ Specific Performance Remedy Institution of Legal Action Estoppel Certificates WAIVERS AND DELAYS No Waiver Third Parties Force Majeure Extensions Notice of Delay NOTICES ATTORNEYS' FEES RECORDING EFFECT OF AGREEMENT ON TITLE Effect on Title Encumbrances and Lenders' Rights SEVERABILITY OF TERMS SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENT TO AUTHORIZING STATUTE RULES OF CONSTRUCTION AND MISCELLANEOUS TERMS Inteq~retation and Governing Law Section Headings Gender No Joint and Several.Liability Covenant of. Good Faith and Fair Dealing No Waiver of Vesting Time of Essence Recitals Entire Agreement EXTENSION OF MAPS NOT FOR BENEFIT OF THIRD PARTIES ATTACHMENTS COUNTERPARTS 28._ 2_9-3o 29.~ 29.__~ 3~0~4- 3~ 31~ 31~ 31~ 32~ 32~ 32~ 33~ 33~ 33~ 33~ 33~ 33~ 33~ 3~ 3~35 713471.1 l 1/19/2009_. 47