Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout93-066 CC Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 93-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMLECULA DEVELOPM[ENT AGREEMENT NO. 92-1, CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 21, TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM R-R TO R-3 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27314, AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SUBDIVIDE A 96.9 ACRE PARCEL INTO FOUR (4) PARCELS AND A REMAINDER PARCEL SUBJECT TO CITY COUNCIL ACTION TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PARCEL NO 2 OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27314, AMENDMENT NO. 3 FROM PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL TO HIGH- DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED NORTH OF PAUBA ROAD, SOUTH OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND EAST OF THE TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL WHEREAS, Linfield School filed Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, City Council and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said applications were processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said applications on April 5, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended denial of said applications; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said applications on June 8, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said applications; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the applications; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findin2s. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the Resos 93-66 1 requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: 1. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan.2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including theissuance of building permits, each of the following: a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. C. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The City Council in denying the proposed applications, makes the following findings, to wit: Change of Zone No. 21 1.The impacts of the Change of Zone could not be determined on the surrounding propertiesdue to insufficient information provided by the applicant. As a result, impacts such as glare,noise, and traffic likely to be increased by the proposed change of zone could not be adequately assessed and a presumption that the proposed zone change would have a negative impact on surrounding land uses was required to be made. Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 1. The Tentative Parcel Map could not be approved since the Change of Zone application was denied. Section 2. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby denies Development Agreement No. 92-1, Change of Zone No. 21, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 27314, Amendment No. 3 to ensure the development of the project as senior housing, congregate care facility, skilled nursing, personal care, a nine hole private golf course and dedication of a Resos 93-66 2 2.3 net acre parcel to the City of Temecula for a senior citizen center, a zone change from R-R (Rural Residential) to R-3 (General Residential) and to subdivide a 96.7 acre parcel into 4 parcels and a 48.4 acre remainder parcel located east of Temecula High School, south of Rancho Vista Road and north of Pauba Road. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPRED this 8th day of June, 1993. J.Sal Muoz, M@or ATTEST: J Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of July, 1993 by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Parks, Roberts, Stone NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz Ju@. Greek, City Clerk Resos 93-66 3