HomeMy WebLinkAbout052620 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City
to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
MAY 26, 2020 - 7:00 PM
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING
This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of
California Executive Order N 29 20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID 19 pandemic. The
live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N 29 20, the public may only view the meeting
on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this Council meeting,
please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email
comments must be submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on
matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the time the Mayor calls the item for Public
Comments. Email comments on agenda items must be submitted prior to the time the Mayor closes
public comments on the agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would
otherwise govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments on agenda items for
this Council meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media
(Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading
shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the
time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the
record of the Council meeting.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor James Stewart
INVOCATION: TBD
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor James Stewart
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
Page 1
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that
appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three
minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes.
For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important
notice provided at the top of this agenda.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A
total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request
specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions
Recommendation
Attachments
That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically
required by the Government Code.
Agenda Report
2. Approve Action Minutes of April 28, May 6 and May 12, 2020
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of April 28, May 6 and
May 12, 2020.
Attachments: Action Minutes - 4/28/20
Action Minutes - 5/6/20
Action Minutes - 5/12/20
3. Approve List of Demands
Recommendation
Attachments
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Agenda Report
Resolution
List of Demands
Page 2
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
4. Approve City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2020
Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of
March 31, 2020.
Attachments: Agenda Report
Treasurer Report
5. Adopt Ordinance 2020-04 Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code Pertaining to the
Accessory Dwelling Units (Second Reading)
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO.2020-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE CERTAIN SUBSECTIONS OF
SECTION 17.06.050 PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS, ESTABLISHING A NEW CHAPTER 17.23 PERTAINING TO
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, AMENDING TABLE 17.24.040
REGARDING PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND FINDING THE
ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Attachments: Agenda Report
Ordinance
6. Adopt Ordinance 2020-05 Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to Conform with
the Density Bonus Ordinance Law Under the California Government Code (Long Range Project
Number LR19-1597) (Second Reading)
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE REGULATIONS TO CONFORM
WITH DENSITY BONUS LAW (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 65915) AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT
Attachments: Agenda Report
Ordinance
Page 3
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
7.
8.
9.
Extend Terms of Appointment for Planning Commissioner Lanae Turley-Trejo and Old Town
Local Review Board Members Annette Brown and Peg Moore
Recommendation: That the City Council extend the terms of appointment for Planning
Commissioner Lanae Turley-Trejo and Old Town Local Review Board
Members Annette Brown and Peg Moore to October 10, 2020.
Attachments: Agenda Report
Set Public Hearing to Approve Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers for
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOLID WASTE AND
RECYCLING RATES FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
Attachments: Agenda Report
Resolution
Rate Schedule
Approve Resolution Regarding the Return of Funds to the US Department of Housing and
Urban Development
Recommendation
Attachments
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REGARDING THE RETURN OF FUNDS TO THE US
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Agenda Report
Resolution
HUD Letter
10. Approve Loan Agreement with Las Haciendas Housing Associates, LP for a 77 Unit Affordable
Housing Project
Recommendation: That the City Council approve a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
Page 4
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
11.
12.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE HOUSING
SUCCESSOR TO THE FORMER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY (AND, WITH RESPECT TO A LOAN OF CITY FEES,
ALSO IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE CITY) APPROVING A LOAN
AGREEMENT WITH LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES,
L.P. FOR THE "LAS HACIENDAS" 77 UNIT LOW INCOME
AFFORDABLE MULTI -FAMILY (APARTMENT) PROJECT AT
28715 LAS HACIENDAS STREET AND 28772 CALLE CORTEZ,
AND THE TAKING OF RELATED ACTIONS, AND MAKING A
FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT SECTION 15182
Attachments: Agenda Report
Resolution
Attachment A
Approve Resolution to Amend the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION
UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
Attachments: Agenda Report
Resolution
Approve Tract Maps and Subdivision Improvement and Monumentation Agreements for
Sommers Bend and Authorize the City Manager to Execute Related Documents
Recommendation:
That the City Council:
1. Approve Tract Map 37341-11, 37341-12, 37341-13, 37341-14,
37341-15 and 37341-16 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
2. Approve the Subdivision Improvement and Monumentation
Agreements with the Developer;
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the
City.
Page 5
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
Attachments: Agenda Report
Fees and Securities Report
Vicinity Mgp
Tract Maps
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Page 6
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: President Zak Schwank
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items
that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to
three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five
minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the
important notice provided at the top of this agenda.
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community
Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
13. Approve Action Minutes of April 28, 2020
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of April 28, 2020.
Attachments: Action Minutes
14. Set Public Hearing to Approve Temecula Community Services District Proposed Rates and
Charges for Fiscal Year 2020-21
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH
RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
Attachments: Agenda Report
Resolution
Exhibit A
Preliminary Engineer Report
15. Terminate Easement for Maintenance of Landscaping on Property Within Tract 21764 and
Service Level C, Zone 7
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled:
Page 7
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
RESOLUTION NO. CSD
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TERMINATING THE EASEMENT FOR
MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING ON PROPERTY WITHIN
TRACT 21764 AND TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT, SERVICE LEVEL "C", ZONE 7
Attachments: Agenda Report
RPcnlntinn
Easement Deed
Zone 7 Map
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, June
9, 2020, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the
Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Page 8
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson James Stewart
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
SARDA PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items
that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to
three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five
minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to
the important notice provided at the top of this agenda.
SARDA CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
action.
16. Approve Joint Action Minutes of April 28, 2020
Recommendation:
Attachments
That the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
approve the joint action minutes of April 28, 2020.
Joint Action Minutes
SARDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
SARDA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
SARDA ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will be held on
Tuesday, June 9, 2020, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00
p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Page 9
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before or during a public hearing in
support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) in the manner prescribed in the important
notice at the top of this agenda. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised in written correspondence delivered to the City
Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
17. Approve Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to Allow Four -Story Hotels Within the
Downtown Core District and to Add Language to the Specific Plan to Clarify the Intended Use
of a Minor Exception for Building Height
Recommendation
That the City Council adopt resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE OLD TOWN
SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(SCH NO.2009071049)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO THE OLD
TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO.
LR20-0209)
Attachments: Agenda Report
Aerial Map
Resolution - EIR Addendum
Exhibit A - EIR Addendum
Resolution - SPA
Exhibit A - SPA
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-11
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-12
Planning Commission Staff Report
Notice of Public Hearing
Draft Notice of Determination
18. Introduce Ordinance to Amend Chanter 17.21 Affordable Housing Overlav Zone of the
Temecula Municipal Code (Long Range Project No. LR20-0279)
Recommendation: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance
entitled:
Page 10
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.21 REGARDING THE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, AND MAKING THE
DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS
EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
Attachments: Agenda Report
Ordinance
Planning Commission Staff Report
Planning Commission Resolution
Notice of Public Hearing
19. Adopt California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Transportation Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT.) Analysis Guidelines
Recommendation:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TO ADOPT THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT ("CEQA") TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE MILES
TRAVELED ("VMT") ANALYSIS GUIDELINES FOR PURPOSES OF
ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER CEQA AND
MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA (LONG
RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR18-1506)
Attachments: Agenda Report
CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
Resolution
Notice of Public Hearing
Planning Commission Staff Report
Planning Commission Resolution
RIT,SINF SS
20. Receive Update to Community Recovery and Reopening Plan and Related Efforts and Provide
General Direction Regarding the Same
Recommendation: That the City Council receive the update to the Community Recovery and
Reopening Plan and related efforts and provide general direction
regarding the same.
Page 11
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
Attachments: Agenda Report
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
21. City Council Travel/Conference Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
Itinerary
22. Community Development Department Monthlv Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
Activity Report
Statistics
Charts
23. Fire Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
Monthly Report
24. Police Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
25. Public Works Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
Project Status Report
COMMISSION REPORTS
PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, June 9, 2020, at 5:30 p.m., for a
Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at
41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Page 12
City Council Agenda May 26, 2020
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material
available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any
item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing online at temeculaca.gov at least 72 hours prior to the
meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at
(951) 694 6444.
Page 13
Item No. 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the
Government Code.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of
the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to
the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of
the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: None
Item No. 2
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 28, 2020 - 7:00 PM
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING APRIL 28, 2020 COUNCIL MEETING
This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of
California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The
live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting
on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the April 28, 2020
Council meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City
Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email
comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the time the Mayor calls the item for
Public Comments. Email comments on agenda items must be submitted prior to the time the Mayor
closes public comments on the agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as
would otherwise govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments on agenda
items for the April 28, 2020 Council meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text
and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading
shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the
time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the
record of the Council meeting.
CLOSED SESSION - 6:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PENDING LITIGATION. The City Council convened
in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) with
respect to the following matter of pending litigation: De Rossi, et al. v. City of Temecula, et al. (Riverside
County Superior Court Case No. MCC2000628).
CALL TO ORDER at 7:00 PM: Mayor James Stewart
INVOCATION: Aaron Adams
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor James Stewart
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Presentation of Proclamations for National Hospital Week and National Nurses Week to Darlene
Wetton, Chief Executive Officer for Temecula Valley Hospital
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following individuals submitted an electronic comment on non-agendized item:
•
Amy Naidus
•
Ashley Zimmer
•
Louis and Denise Todd
•
Shari LaFleur
•
Jim Seilsopour
•
Jerry and Donna Leavitt
•
Tiana Buschmann
•
Thomas LaFleur
•
Shannon Flynn
•
Christina Leavitt
•
Clayton Lisk
•
Lee Rosu
•
John James
•
Laura Bustos
•
Susann Williams
•
No Name
•
Brad Williams
•
Ronald Zimmer
•
Candi Zimmer
•
David Maggiore-Anet
The following individuals submitted an electronic comment on agendized item:
•
Jennifer Richard (14)
•
Leslie Van Deusen (17)
•
Melanie House (14)
•
Nichole Burkholder (17)
•
Shelly Anguiano Figueroa (14)
•
Laura Stearn Wieters (17)
•
Dorcas Shaktman (14)
•
Ray Faulkner (17)
•
Tammy Marine (14)
•
Rick Reiss (17)
•
Craig Puma (17)
•
Rob Park (17)
•
Adam Ricketts (17)
•
Alisha Meyer (17)
•
Joanna Ricketts (17)
•
BJ Fazeli (17)
•
Christopher Flores (17)
•
Melinda Shaw (17)
•
Lisa Sanchez, M.A., Ph.D. (17)
•
Jaime Rench (17)
•
Pam Bailey (17)
•
Ann Mousner (17)
•
Scott Williams (17)
•
Krista Chaich (17)
•
Arthur and Lana Salyer (17)
•
DeShaun Williams (17)
•
Eric Sammons (17)
•
Rick and Sherry Foss (17)
•
Kathleen Bowen (17)
•
Wendy Rench (17)
•
Tami Simms (17)
•
Emily Falappino (17)
•
Elaine Ramos -Garcia, RN (17)
•
Bill Wilson (17)
•
L Warren (17)
•
Pastor William Rench (17)
• Maurice Hermeyer (17)
• Tj Salinas (17)
• Kyla Murphy (17)
• Cynthia Zubiate (17)
• Bernadette McConnell (17)
• Scott Forest (17)
• Ursula Antinelli (17)
• Regina Small (17)
• Richard Baldrick (17)
• Jane Lauhon (17)
• Bennie Lauhon (17)
• Calvary Baptist Church (17)
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
• Carrie Rench (17)
• Laurie Solie (17)
• Matthew Rowley (17)
• Erica Valles (17)
• Karen Daniels (17)
• Courtney Sheehan (17)
• Ed Dool (17)
• Mr. & Mrs. Bud Duke (17)
• Dave Van Laeys (17)
• Kevin Brooks (17)
• Ryan Brown (17)
CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected
unanimous approval.
1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions
Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically
required by the Government Code.
2. Approve Action Minutes of March 10 and March 24, 2020
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of March 10 and
March 24, 2020.
3. Approve List of Demands
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A - FEBRUARY 27, 2020 - MARCH 5, 2020
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A - MARCH 11, 2020 - APRIL 7, 2020
4. Approve City Treasurer's Reports as of December 31, 2019, January 31, 2020 and February 29,
2020
Recommendation:
That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of
December 31, 2019, January 31, 2020 and February 29, 2020.
5. Adopt Ordinance 2020-03 Amending Title 17 and Title 18 of the Temecula Municipal Code
Related to Small Cell Wireless Facilities Located Within the Public Right -of -Way and Adopt
Resolution Regarding an Updated Policy for Small Wireless Facilities in the Public
Right -of -Way (Long Range Planning Application Number LR19-0498) (Second Reading)
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-03
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 17 AND 18 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SMALL CELL WIRELESS
3
6.
7.
8.
E
10.
FACILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3)
Adopt Resolution Reaffirming and Proclaiming the Existence of a Local Emergency Relating to
the COVID-19 Pandemic
Recommendation:
That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REAFFIRMING AND PROCLAIMING THE
EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATING TO THE
COVID-19 VIRUS PANDEMIC AND ISSUING CERTAIN ORDERS
FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY AFFAIRS DURING THE LOCAL
EMERGENCY
Receive and File Update on the Housing Element Annual Progress Report to the Department of
Housing and Community Development
Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file an update on the Housing Element
Annual Progress Report to California Department of Housing and
Community Development for the reporting period of January 1, 2019 to
December 31, 2019.
Approve Participation in the Riverside County Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC,) Program
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATE (MCC) PROGRAM
Adopt Resolution to Authorize Application For and Receipt of Local Early Action Planning
Grant Program Funds (Long Range Planning Project Number LR20 0360)
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR AND RECEIPT
OF LOCAL EARLY ACTION PLANNING GRANTS PROGRAM
FUNDS
Approve List of Projects to be Funded by Senate Bill One (SB 1) for Fiscal Year 2020-21
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
4
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A LIST OF PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED
BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF
2017
RECESS:
At 7:41 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District
Meeting and Joint Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency/City Council Meeting
and the Temecula Public Financing Authority Meeting. At 7:52 PM, the City Council resumed with the
remainder of the City Council Agenda.
JOINT SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/CITY
COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER at 7:48 PM: Chairperson James Stewart
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
SARDA PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
SARDA/COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected
unanimous approval.
12. Approve Sixth Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement for the Town
Square Marketplace Development Between the Successor Agency to the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency, the City of Temecula, and Town Square Marketplace Old Town, LLC
Located at APNs. 922-360-004, 005, 006, 007)
Recommendation: 1. That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND
AMONG THE CITY OF TEMECULA, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO
THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND TOWN
SQUARE MARKETPLACE OLD TOWN, LLC CONVEYING
APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON
MAIN STREET WEST OF MERCEDES STREET
2. That the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. SARDA 2020-04
5
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY APPROVING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND
AMONG THE CITY OF TEMECULA, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO
THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND TOWN
SQUARE MARKETPLACE OLD TOWN, LLC CONVEYING
APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON
MAIN STREET WEST OF MERCEDES STREET
SARDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
SARDA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
SARDA ADJOURNMENT
At 7:50 PM, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally
adjourned to Tuesday, May 12, 2020, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session
commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
14. Approve Fiscal Year 2020-21 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action
Plan Funding
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2020-21 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER
THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
(CDBG) PROGRAM
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Rahn. The vote
reflected unanimous approval.
15. Adopt Ordinance Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code Pertainingto o the
Accessory Dwelling Units
Recommendation: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance
entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
6
MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE CERTAIN SUBSECTIONS OF
SECTION 17.06.050 PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS, ESTABLISHING A NEW CHAPTER 17.23 PERTAINING TO
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, AMENDING TABLE 17.24.040
REGARDING PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND FINDING THE
ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Edwards. The vote
reflected unanimous approval.
16. Adopt Ordinance Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to Conform with the
Density Bonus Ordinance Law Under the California Government Code (Long Range Project
Number LR19-1597)
Recommendation: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance
entitled:
ORDINANCE NO.2020-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE REGULATIONS TO CONFORM
WITH DENSITY BONUS LAW (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 65915) AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Schwank. The vote
reflected unanimous approval.
BUSINESS
17. Consider Federal Guidelines, State Framework and County Public Health Orders for Reopening
Post COVID-19 and Provide General Direction Regarding Local Preferences for the Same (At
the Request of Council Members Naggar and Schwank)
Recommendation:
That the City Council consider the following items:
1. Riverside County Public Health Officer Orders and provide general
direction on the accessibility of parks and similar amenities, including
the corresponding parking lots throughout the City; and
2. Federal guidelines and state framework for reopening the nation and
state post COVID-19 and provide general direction regarding local
preferences for the same.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Rahn. The vote
reflected unanimous approval. Motion to provide direction to staff to (1) open all smaller park
and dog park parking lots, excluding the larger sports parks, (2) monitor activity at the parks after
the reopening of those lots and report back to the City Council next week, and (3) return with a
reopening plan for Council consideration next week.
7
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
18. Community Development Department Monthly Report — Receive and file only
19. Fire Department Monthly Report — Receive and file only
20. Police Department Monthly Report — Receive and file only
COMMISSION REPORTS
PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
At 12:12 AM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 12, at 5:30 PM for
Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main
Street, Temecula, California.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
MAY 6, 2020 - 9:30 AM
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING
This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State
of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The
live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting
on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments on the agenda item at this
Council meeting, please submit your comments by email to the City Clerk at
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise
govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments on agenda items for this Council
meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter,
etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments on the agenda item,
provided that the reading shall not exceed five (5) minutes, or such other time as the Council may
provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted
shall become part of the record of the Council meeting.
CALL TO ORDER at 9:30 AM: Mayor James Stewart
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following individuals submitted an electronic comment on agendized item:
Dianne Joseph
Kyla Murphy
Jessica Ward
BUSINESS
Ann Mousner
Lisa Sanchez
Charlene Denning
1. Consider Parks Update and 4th of July Event and Provide General Direction Regarding the
Same
Recommendation: That the City Council receive an update on parks and parking lots, and
the 4th of July event, and provide general direction regarding the same.
Approved (3-2, Rahn and Schwank Noes): Motion by Naggar, Second by Edwards. Motion to
approve proceeding with the July 4th fireworks show with Ronald Reagan Sports Park open
provided that: 1) the Governor's Executive Orders, State Public Health Department orders and
Riverside County Public Health Officer's orders would not prohibit the event; and 2) the vendors
for the July 4th event would consent to a late cancellation without fees or costs to the City in the
event the City could not hold the event.
ADJOURNMENT
At 12:02 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 12, at 5:30 PM for
Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main
Street, Temecula, California.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
MAY 12, 2020 - 9:30 AM
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING
This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of
California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The
live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting
on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments on the agenda item at this
Council meeting, please submit your comments by email to the City Clerk at
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise
govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments on agenda items for this Council
meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook,
Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email
provided that the reading shall not exceed five (5) minutes, or such
provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting.
shall become part of the record of the Council meeting.
CALL TO ORDER at 9:30 AM: Mayor James Stewart
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor James Stewart
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
PUBLIC COMMENTS
comments on the agenda item,
other time as the Council may
The email comments submitted
The following individuals submitted an electronic comment on agendized item:
• Kathy Pellissier • Jeannie Young
• Kerry Guizzo • Christy Ramos
• Tom Ludwig
BUSINESS
1. Consider Draft Community Recovery and Reopening Plan and Provide General Direction
Regarding the Same
Recommendation: That the City Council:
1. Consider the draft Community Recovery and Reopening Plan and
related advocacy letter, and provide general direction regarding the
same, and
2. Authorize staff to continuously update the plan as needed in response
to County and State orders and guidance.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Edwards. The vote
reflected unanimous approval. Motion to approve draft Community Recovery and Reopening
Plan, with references to PPE to reflect County and State guidance, and authorize staff to send
the revised advocacy language as read by the City Attorney with references to all businesses
being essential, houses of worship being essential and Temecula, Murrieta and Temecula Wine
Country being a subregion of the County.
ADJOURNMENT
At 12:03 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 12, at 5:30 PM for
Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main
Street, Temecula, California.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Item No. 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands
PREPARED BY: Jada Shafe, Accounting Technician II
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review
and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached
claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or
authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies
and procedures.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution
2. List of Demands
RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in
the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are
hereby allowed in the amount of $8,818,630.67
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26th day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
04/16/2020 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
04/23/2020 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
04/30/2020 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/07/2020 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
04/16/2020 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
04/30/2020 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 5/26/2020 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
$ 1,038,663.77
854,969.83
3,133,477.32
2,843,826.79
495,822.97
451,869.99
$ 8,818,630.67
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
001
GENERAL FUND $ 6,039,777.78
125
PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT
120.00
140
COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
17,337.56
165
RDA DEV LOW/MOD 20% SET ASIDE
11,491.30
170
MEASURE A FUND
193,951.48
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
319,061.98
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS
492.84
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING
950.94
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
13,381.13
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
20,293.59
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND
760,588.97
300
INSURANCE FUND
17,775.16
305
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
2,365.97
320
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
200,368.70
325
TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND
36,578.77
330
CENTRAL SERVICES
6,684.80
340
FACILITIES
85,693.34
472
CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE
1,774.74
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,775.00
474
AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
1,235.14
475
CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,797.87
476
CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,775.00
477
CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,820.80
478
CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE 11
1,775.00
501
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD
2,461.53
502
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK
1,963.94
503
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAND
2,807.90
504
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS
362.62
505
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES
2,010.05
506
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY
1,185.20
507
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW
790.07
508
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE
6,046.34
509
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA
176.53
510
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE
505.89
511
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW
115.44
512
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS
3,862.33
513
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP.
1,889.62
514
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES
779.09
515
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES
561.39
516
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS
1,115.84
517
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA
119.48
518
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS
5,324.71
519
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR
3,034.15
520
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL
6,890.64
521
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH
18,795.90
522
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE
221.51
523
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
385.87
524
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON
23,163.53
525
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS
2,182.26
526
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION
73.96
527
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE
777.96
528
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK
44,361.05
529
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT
105.05
$ 7,870,937.71
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
001
GENERAL FUND $
611,614.51
140
COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
1,282.85
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
10,162.18
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
215,640.10
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS
881.81
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING
2,137.17
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
903.69
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
4,843.95
300
INSURANCE FUND
1,868.91
305
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
1,324.29
320
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
72,429.75
330
SUPPORT SERVICES
6,920.96
340
FACILITIES
14,157.73
472
CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE
200.67
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
200.58
474
AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
200.58
475
CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
252.09
476
CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND
200.58
477
CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND
303.56
478
CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II
200.58
501
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD
0.66
502
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK
22.92
503
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS
0.46
504
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS
4.58
505
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES
22.92
506
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY
11.51
507
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW
22.92
508
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE
343.69
509
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA
1.40
510
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE
9.16
511
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW
2.30
512
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS
229.59
513
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP.
22.92
514
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES
6.86
515
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES
6.00
516
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS
27.08
517
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA
0.46
518
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS
99.99
519
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR
53.66
520
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL
229.49
521
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH
318.48
522
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE
3.22
523
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
6.42
524
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON
186.76
525
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS
44.48
526
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION
0.92
527
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE
6.42
528
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK
277.93
529
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT
3.22
TOTAL BY FUND:
947,692.96
$ 8,818,630.67
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK
Check # Date
Vendor
Description
8589 4/16/2020
010349
CALIF DEPT OF CHILD
SUPPORT PAYMENT
SUPPORT
8590 4/16/2020
021301
1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN
ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN
106474
PAYMENT
8591 4/16/2020
000194
1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN
ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457
303355
PAYMENT
8592 4/16/2020
000444
INSTATAX (EDD)
STATE TAXES PAYMENT
8593 4/16/2020
000283
INSTATAX (IRS)
FEDERAL TAXES PAYMENT
8594 4/16/2020
001065
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT
SOLUTION
8595 4/16/2020
019088
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT
SOLUTION
PAYMENT
8596 4/16/2020
000389
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT
SOLUTION
PAYMENT
8597 4/16/2020
000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES'
PER RETIREMENT PAYMENT
RETIREMENT)
8598 3/27/2020
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
015626
EVENTBRITE.COM
IG REGIST: WORKERS COMP CLASS:
MULLEN
015534
GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC,
IG ADVERTISING: LNDSCP INSPECTOR
DBA NEOGOV
015534
GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC,
IG ADVERTISING: LNDSCP INSPECTOR
DBA NEOGOV
021003
CVS PHARMACY
IG ACRYLIC PANELS: HR
007517
PECHANGA RESORT & CASINO
IG DEPOSIT-WORKSHOP:LDRSHP
TRNG 3/4-5
015534
GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC,
IG ADVERTISING: BUS DRIVER
DBA NEOGOV
007517
PECHANGA RESORT & CASINO
IG FINAL DEPOSIT-WRKSHP:LDRSHP
TRNG 3/4-
007517
PECHANGA RESORT & CASINO
IG WORKSHOP: LEADERSHIP TRNG
3/4-5
007651
FILIPPIS PIZZA GROTTO
IG RFRSHMNTS: HR WORKING MTG
021734
UCB IRLE
IG POCKET BK: FAMILY MEDICAL
LEAVE ACT
Amount Paid Check Total
899.07
899.07
1,134.62
1,134.62
13,806.25
13,806.25
26,908.72
26,908.72
89,785.36
89,785.36
11,844.54
11,844.54
28.51
28.51
1,507.80
1,507.80
111, 232.45
111, 232.45
44.06
240.22
119.00
193.89
600.00
199.00
2,500.00
1,868.60
91.13
43.45 5,899.35
Page-1
apChkLst
04/16/2020
11:28:09AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 2
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
200998
4/16/2020
020724
79 FIELD HOCKEY INC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
112.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
56.00
168.00
200999
4/16/2020
003552
AFLAC PREMIUM HOLDING,
AFLAC ACCIDENT INDEMNITY
4,009.72
4,009.72
C/O BNB BANK LOCKBOX
PAYMENT
201000
4/16/2020
021522
AGILITY KIDS LLC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
224.70
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
162.40
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
162.40
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
568.40
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
406.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
324.80
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
674.10
2,522.80
201001
4/16/2020
009010
ALEXANDER PACIFIC
REFUND:SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
590.00
590.00
201002
4/16/2020
003951
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
410.43
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
975.36
1,385.79
201003
4/16/2020
021746
ALLIANCE PROPANE INC
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
500.00
500.00
201004
4/16/2020
009787
ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC
PARTS FOR THE PW BOOM TRUCK
97.86
97.86
201005
4/16/2020
007282
AMAZON COM INC,
VOID - BOOKS: LIBRARY
0.00
SYNCB/AMAZON
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
0.00
OFC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY
0.00
SUPPLIES:SPECIAL EVENTS
0.00
BOOKS: LIBRARY
0.00
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
0.00
BOOKS: LIBRARY
0.00
BOOKS: LIBRARY
0.00
Office Supplies: HR
0.00
SUPPLIES:HUMAN SVCS PGMS
0.00
MISC SUPPLIES: ECON DEV
0.00
SUPPLIES:TVM EVENTS
0.00
BOOKS: LIBRARY
0.00
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
0.00
SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: HR
0.00
SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK
0.00
MISC OFC SUPPLIES:MALL STOREFRONT
0.00
0.00
201006
4/16/2020
004240
AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES
DUI DRUG & ALCOHOL SCREENING
227.00
AFN
DUI DRUG & ALCOHOL SCREENING
1,118.00
DUI DRUG & ALCOHOL SCREENING
56.75
1,401.75
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201007
4/16/2020
021383
AMERICAN RAMP COMPANY
RET RELEASE: RRSP PUMP TRACK,
INC
PW18-04
201008
4/16/2020
000101
APPLE ONE INC
MAR TEMP STAFF SVCS: CLERK &
TCSD
201009
4/16/2020
013950
AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO
APR DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT:
MPSC
APR DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: OTSF 8
APR DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: CIVIC C
APR DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: JRC
APR DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: INFO TI
APR DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: PW
201010
4/16/2020
004623
AQUA SOURCE INC
POOL SUPPLIES: VARIOUS FACILITIES
201011
4/16/2020
021776
ARNOLD, SUSAN
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201012
4/16/2020
014356
ARSENAL FUTBOL CLUB, INC.
REFUND: SOCCER FIELD RENTAL
CANCELLED
201013
4/16/2020
017797
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO.,
20-21 UAS PREMIUM
INSURANCE BROKERS OF CA
201014
4/16/2020
020762
AT&T
MARCH SVC PD TE200650130
201015
4/16/2020
018941
AZTEC LANDSCAPING INC
MAR MAINT SVCS: PARKS/SCHOOLS
PW
201016
4/16/2020
017149
B G P RECREATION INC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201017
4/16/2020
021767
BALLARD, MIKE
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201018
4/16/2020
006254
BALLET FOLKLORICO, AKA
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
LORENA HANCOCK
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201019
4/16/2020
015592
BAMM PROMOTIONAL
STAFF UNIFORMS - MRC: TCSD
PRODUCTS INC
201020
4/16/2020
020574
BATTERY SYSTEMS INC
BATTERIES: PW -TRAFFIC
Amount Paid Check Total
17,829.74
17,829.74
3,123.58
3,123.58
34.75
56.57
183.71
28.28
28.28
28.28
359.87
1,688.89
1,688.89
250.00
250.00
1,120.00
1,120.00
1,075.00
1,075.00
375.00
375.00
9,550.50
9,550.50
693.00
415.80
1,386.00
5,759.60
362.25
362.25
724.50
9,703.40
530.00
520.00
1,050.00
39.20
78.40
117.60
913.09
913.09
1,904.95
1,904.95
Page:3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date Vendor
201021
4/16/2020 019559
BMW MOTORCYCLES OF
RIVERSIDE
201022
4/16/2020 011348
BONCOR WATER SYSTEMS
LLC, DBA SUNSHINE WATER
SOFT
(Continued)
Description
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: TEM
SHERIFF
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: TEM SHERIFI
APR WTR TANK FILTER REPL: STA 73
201023
4/16/2020
021502
BUCHER, BRET PHILLIP
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201024
4/16/2020
003138
CAL MAT, DBA VULCAN
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
MATERIALS CO
MAINT
201025
4/16/2020
004248
CALIF DEPT OF
MAR FINGERPRINT SVCS:
JUSTICE-ACCTING
PD/ECODEV/HR
201026
4/16/2020
001267
CALIF DEPT OF MOTOR
REGISTRATION: LIC PLATE: 56PM58:
VEHICLES
FIRE
REGISTRATION: LIC PLATE: 56PM59: FIR
201027
4/16/2020
021761
CAMARATA, JOSEPH
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201028
4/16/2020
021054
CANTRELL, TINA J
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201029
4/16/2020
021740
CARPENTER, TARA
REFUND: THEATER TICKETS WONDER
ELVIS
201030
4/16/2020
018828
CASC ENGINEERING AND,
FEB WQMP PLAN CK - PW13-09 TPL
CONSULTING INC
ENG SVCS:BTRFLD STG RD PH III, PW1E
201031
4/16/2020
004462
CDW LLC, DBA CDW
REPLACEMENT LAPTOP: INFO TECH
GOVERNMENT LLC
201032
4/16/2020
012871
CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL
REFUND: HARVESTON PARK PICNIC
LIVING TV
CANCELLED
201033
4/16/2020
020025
CIVIL SOURCE INC
FEB ENG SVCS: BUTTERFIELD STG,
PW15-11
FEB PROF SVCS:LIBRARY PRKG PH III,P
FEB ENG SVCS: BUTTERFIELD STG, PW
201034
4/16/2020
017429
COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA
MAR FSA & COBRAADMIN: HR
THE ADVANTAGE GROUP
201035
4/16/2020
019814
CODE 5 GROUP LLC
TRACKER UPGRADE: POLICE
201036
4/16/2020
021743
COLEY, CARL
REFUND: TEMECULA PRESENTS
SHOW CANCELLED
Amount Paid Check Total
209.44
179.00
279.96
560.00
420.00
174.71
1,411.00
52.00
52.00
530.00
175.00
140.00
1,937.68
2,948.08
1,679.33
40.00
12, 615.00
5,220.00
16,065.00
593.70
237.00
50.00
388.44
279.96
980.00
174.71
1,411.00
104.00
530.00
175.00
140.00
4,885.76
1,679.33
40.00
33,900.00
593.70
237.00
50.00
Page:4
apChkLst
04/16/2020
11:28:09AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 5
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201037
4/16/2020
004405
COMMUNITY HEALTH
EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS
4.00
4.00
CHARITIES
PAYMENT
201038
4/16/2020
021460
COMOTION MEDIA INC
RAIN SUITS: STREET MAINT: PW
5,868.39
5,868.39
201039
4/16/2020
004412
COMPLETE TENNIS CAMP,
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
91.00
CTC TENNIS AKA KERRY LE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
193.20
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
1,319.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
144.90
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
115.50
1,864.10
201040
4/16/2020
021230
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY
666.09
DISTR, DBA CALIF ELECTRIC
SUPPLY
STREET LIGHTING SUPPLIES: PW
19,792.50
20,458.59
201041
4/16/2020
012035
COOL AIR SOLUTIONS
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
570.00
570.00
201042
4/16/2020
013379
COSSOU, CELINE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
52.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
373.80
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
48.30
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
554.40
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
28.00
1,057.00
201043
4/16/2020
017542
COX, KRISTI LYN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
56.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
89.60
145.60
201044
4/16/2020
017038
CPS HR CONSULTING
EMPLOYEE TRAINING: HR
1,045.00
1,045.00
201045
4/16/2020
010650
CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING &
MISC PLUMBING REPAIRS:
520.00
HVAC INC
HARVESTON PARK
PLUMBING SVCS: 6TH STREET RESTRO
946.84
1,466.84
201046
4/16/2020
019858
CUB SCOUT PACK 301
REFUND: CRC RENTAL CANCELLED
275.00
5/11 /20
REFUND: SEC DEPOSIT CRC 3/9/20
200.00
475.00
201047
4/16/2020
021752
DANIEL L SMITH DMD INC
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
500.00
500.00
201048
4/16/2020
012600
DAVID EVANS AND
FEB DSGN SVCS: TPL PARKING PH II
950.00
ASSOCIATES INC
PW13-09
FEB DSGN SVCS: DLR SIDEWALKS. PW1
7,376.00
8,326.00
201049
4/16/2020
015878
DEAN, JAMIE
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
77.00
77.00
201050
4/16/2020
021771
DEAN, RAWLIN
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
10.00
10.00
Page:5
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date Vendor
201051
4/16/2020 020648
DG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS 2
INC, CONVERGINT
TECHNOLOGIES
201052
4/16/2020 003945
DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL
SRVCS
201053 4/16/2020 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL
201054 4/16/2020 004068 ECALDRE MANALILI-DE VILLA,
AILEEN
(Continued)
Description
SURVEILLANCE SYS GENETEC LIC:
INFO TECH
PORTABLE RESTROOM: LONG
CANYON PARK
PORTABLE RESTROOM: RIVERTON PAR
PORTABLE RESTROOM: LA SERENA WA
TEMPORARY FENCING: JRC
PORTABLE RESTROOM: VAIL RANCH PA
PORTABLE TOILET SVC: PUJOL ST
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET
MAINT
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP PW
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: F
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PV1
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201055
4/16/2020
020671
ECLIPSE PRINTING &
SCALE PRINTING & INSTALLATION -
GRAPHICS, LLC DBA JAMES
KMA
LITHO
201056
4/16/2020
020904
ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVES INC
APR CONDENSER H2O SYST MAINT:
CIVIC CTR
201057
4/16/2020
021756
EDWARDS, JOEL
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201058
4/16/2020
016839
EHS INTERNATIONAL INC
WC SAFETY CONSULTANT: RISK
MGMT
WC SAFETY CONSULTANT: RISK MGMT
201059
4/16/2020
011202
EMH SPORTS USA INC
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201060
4/16/2020
021157
ENDURING FITNESS 41-1
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
Amount Paid Check Total
5,360.60
110.88
110.88
110.88
95.00
165.88
52.43
724.58
59.23
101.25
72.58
370.57
36.64
118.35
317.46
70.00
70.00
35.00
35.00
35.00
5,116.16
525.00
30.00
26.00
544.00
262.50
87.50
70.00
196.00
105.00
112.00
56.00
280.00
5,360.60
645.95
1,800.66
245.00
5,116.16
525.00
600.00
350.00
539.00
280.00
Page.-6
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201061
4/16/2020
002577
ENGINEERING RESOURCES
FEB ENG SVCS: BIKE TRAIL PGM:
PW19-11
201062
4/16/2020
002939
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
ASSET MGMNT SFTWR: GIS
RESEARCH, INSTITUTE INC
201063
4/16/2020
021753
EVERETT EVERETT PAINTING
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
INC
201064
4/16/2020
001056
EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC
IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS
LOCATIONS
IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS LOCATI,
LDSCPIMPROVEMENTS: HARVESTONS
IRRIG REPAIRS: SAM HICKS PARK
201065
4/16/2020
015330
FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, OF
FEB CDBG SUB -RECIPIENT: FAIR
RIVERSIDE COUNTY INC
HOUSING SVC
201066
4/16/2020
021744
FAZEK, DAVID A
HOMELESS PREVENTION SRVCS
201067
4/16/2020
009953
FEDERAL CLEANING
APR JANITORIAL SRVCS: POLICE
CONTRACTORS, DBA FEDERAL
MALL OFC
BLDG SERVICES
201068
4/16/2020
000165
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
3/20-3/23 EXP MAIL SVCS: LAND DEV &
3/24-3/26 EXP MAIL SVCS: PD & CLERK
201069
4/16/2020
010804
FEHRAND PEERS
CEQATrafficAnalysisUpdate -VMT
201070
4/16/2020
021774
FELKER, SAUNDRA
REFUND: MOTHER'S DAY TEA PARTY
CANCELLED
201071
4/16/2020
001511
FIELDMAN ROLAPP AND
FINANCIAL ADVISORY SVCS: FINANCE
ASSOCIATES
201072
4/16/2020
021759
FLOHR, JOHN
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201073
4/16/2020
021757
FLORES, JOHN
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201074
4/16/2020
014865
FREIZE UHLER KIMBERLY DBA,
EMBROIDERY SVCS: EMERGENCY
CLEAR BLUE PROMOTIONS
MGMT POLO
EMBROIDERED SVCS: SUPERVISOR AC,
201075
4/16/2020
021732
GABIOLA, ANDREALYNNE
REFUND: BEAR CUB UNIVERSITY
CANCELLED
201076
4/16/2020
021747
GANDARA, BARBARA
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
Amount Paid Check Total
10,558.00
10,558.00
58,000.00
58,000.00
500.00
500.00
845.58
183.33
15,360.00
87.82
16,476.73
1,560.50
1,560.50
1,800.00
1,800.00
1.167.06
1.167.06
56.84
56.61
113.45
5,617.40
5,617.40
10.00
10.00
4,614.25
4,614.25
38.50
38.50
520.00
520.00
159.81
47.84
207.65
374.00
374.00
38.50
38.50
Page:?
apChkLst
04/16/2020
11:28:09AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 8
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201077
4/16/2020
021742
GAYOU, JENNIFER
REFUND: MAGIC AT THE MERC 3/22/20
66.00
REFUND: TEMECULA PRESENTS SHOW
81.00
147.00
201078
4/16/2020
012066
GEOCON WEST INC
GEOTECH PEER REVIEW MNTN VIEW
4,500.00
4,500.00
PARK
201079
4/16/2020
021308
GILLIS + PANICHAPAN
ARCHITECTURAL SVCS: FIRE STA 84
2,185.00
2,185.00
ARCHITECTS, INC
PW19-14
201080
4/16/2020
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFC SUPPLIES: CODE ENFORCEMENT
25.15
INC
OFC SUPPLIES: PLANNING
16.27
OFC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT.
141.33
OFC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY
81.23
OFC SUPPLIES: CODE ENFORCEMENT
61.44
OFC SUPPLIES: PLANNING
68.19
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: COVID19
198.89
592.50
201081
4/16/2020
021751
GOMEZ, CLAUDIA
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
86.00
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
310.00
396.00
201082
4/16/2020
016552
GONZALES, MARK ALLEN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
960.00
960.00
201083
4/16/2020
019177
GOSCH FORD TEMECULA
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
620.00
620.00
201084
4/16/2020
021748
GRAHAM, BRETT
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
540.00
540.00
201085
4/16/2020
003792
GRAINGER
PW PARKS: MISC SAFETY SUPPLIES
168.74
MISC SAFETY SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW
196.04
364.78
201086
4/16/2020
021194
GREAT OAK HIGH SCHOOL
REFUND: CRC RENTAL 5/27
200.00
200.00
ASB
CANCELLED
201087
4/16/2020
021763
GROUND, LEE
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
500.00
500.00
201088
4/16/2020
000186
HANKS HARDWARE INC
MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS
83.75
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS
69.52
MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
21.74
MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
66.30
MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET MAINT
26.95
MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
211.92
MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
20.98
MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
-20.98
MAINT SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS
32.59
512.77
201089
4/16/2020
021750
HANNEMAN, CHRIS
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
550.00
550.00
Page:8
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201090
4/16/2020
002109
HD SUPPLY CONSTR. SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
LTD, DBA HDS WHITE CAP
CONST
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
201091
4/16/2020
021781
HEREDIA, WILLIAM
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201092
4/16/2020
021766
HOLMQUIST, MELISSA
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201093
4/16/2020
017334
HOUSE OF AUTOMATION INC
BAY DOOR SVC - FIRE STA 95
INSPECT & SVC ROLL -UP DOORS: FOC
201094
4/16/2020
014378
IMAGE DISTRIBUTION
PRINTING: PARKING CITES: TEM
SERVICES, DBA FONTIS
SHERIFF
SOLUTIONS
201095
4/16/2020
006914
INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT
MAR COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR:
SOLUTIONS
CITYWIDE
MAR COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR: Cll
201096
4/16/2020
012285
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
201097
4/16/2020
001091
KEYSER MARSTON
MAR FISCAL IMPACT
ASSOCIATES INC
ANALYSIS: HEIRLOOM
201098
4/16/2020
021784
KILLARNEY'S PUB & GRILL
REFUND:PA20-0197 PERMIT
CANCELLED
201099
4/16/2020
012865
LAGMAN, ANGELINE
REFUND: MOTHER'S DAY TEA PARTY
CANCELLED
201100
4/16/2020
000482
LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC
GEOTECH PEER REVIEW RIDGE
PARK OFC: PLA
201101
4/16/2020
015953
LLOYDS DESIGNS
DESIGN SVCS:TCSD
201102
4/16/2020
011145
LODATO JILL CHRISTINE, DBA
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
BRIGHT START FOR KIDS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201103
4/16/2020
021725
LOGIX TRANSPORTATON INC
EXHIBIT SHIPPING:TVM
Amount Paid Check Total
26.09
135.69
819.35
761.24
1,742.37
620.00
620.00
540.00
540.00
496.41
672.00
1,168.41
1,091.00
1,091.00
168.64
2,440.26 2,608.90
1,000.64
369.74
169.37 1,539.75
849.96 849.96
300.00 300.00
10.00 10.00
875.00 875.00
1,500.00 1,500.00
486.50
73.50
52.50
84.00
583.80 1,280.30
2,450.00 2,450.00
Page9
apChkLst
04/16/2020
11:28:09AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 10
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201104
4/16/2020
021765
LOTORTO, MAX
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
590.00
590.00
201105
4/16/2020
003782
MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA
VARI PARK SIGNS & SUPPLIES
1,077.50
ATHACO INC
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP
1,818.66
CITY SIGNAGE: CLOSED COVID: PARKS
754.25
3,650.41
201106
4/16/2020
004141
MAINTEX INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES: THEATER
132.95
CLEANING SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
63.58
CLEANING SUPPLIES: LIBRARY
193.68
CLEANING SUPPLIES: THEATER
34.13
424.34
201107
4/16/2020
011920
MASTER CONCEPTS LLC, DBA
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
441.00
MASTER SPORTS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
294.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
1,102.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
367.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
661.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
1,102.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
661.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
1,102.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
588.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
367.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
441.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
1,260.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
882.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
735.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
808.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
294.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
735.00
11,844.00
201108
4/16/2020
017427
MATCHETT, VIVIAN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
36.40
36.40
201109
4/16/2020
021637
MATTRESS FIRM INC
MATTRESS REPL- STA 84
5,703.74
5,703.74
201110
4/16/2020
021749
MAZZOLA, CARLENE
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
540.00
540.00
201111
4/16/2020
021770
MCGAHEY, PHILIP
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
550.00
550.00
201112
4/16/2020
018675
MDG ASSOCIATES INC
MAR CDBG ADMIN SVCS
6,190.00
MAR LABOR COMPLIANCE MONITORING
713.75
6,903.75
201113
4/16/2020
018314
MICHAEL BAKER
1/1-3/1 DSGN SVC:PARK&RIDE,
20,257.44
20,257.44
INTERNATIONAL
PW18-11
Page:10
apChkLst
04/16/2020
11:28:09AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 11
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201114
4/16/2020
020907
MICHELLE MEDINA, DBA
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
409.50
MICHELLE Q MEDINA
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
672.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
588.00
1,669.50
201115
4/16/2020
004951
MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING
ON -CALL WELDING & REPAIRS: PARKS
492.00
492.00
INC
201116
4/16/2020
021343
MILLER ARCHITECTURAL
11/1-2/29 ARCHITECT SVCS: PW19-06
3,310.00
3,310.00
CORP
201117
4/16/2020
012264
MIRANDA, JULIO C
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
378.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
126.00
504.00
201118
4/16/2020
004043
MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY
SAFETY KITS: VARIOUS PARKS
754.39
754.39
INC
201119
4/16/2020
001868
MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSAN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
115.50
ANN
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
77.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
77.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
77.00
346.50
201120
4/16/2020
016445
MKB PRINTING &
MISC PRINTING SUPPLIES: FINANCE
606.67
606.67
PROMOTIONAL INC, DBA
MINUTEMAN PRESS
201121
4/16/2020
021737
MOHR MUSIC SCHOOL
REFUND: LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL
175.00
175.00
CANCELLED
201122
4/16/2020
004040
MORAMARCO ANTHONY J,
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
31.50
DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
105.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
1,683.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
280.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
45.50
2,145.50
201123
4/16/2020
001214
MORNINGSTAR PRODUCTIONS
GOBO FOR SPECIAL GAMES 4/18/20
95.21
95.21
LLC
201124
4/16/2020
021764
MURPHY, LEON
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
550.00
550.00
201125
4/16/2020
021738
MURRIETA KOREAN,
REFUND: CRC RENTAL 5/3
200.00
200.00
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
CANCELLED
Page:11
apChkLst
04/16/2020
11:28:09AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 12
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201126
4/16/2020
014391
NICHOLS, KELLIE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
368.55
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
143.33
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
368.55
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
368.55
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
389.03
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
348.08
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
102.38
2,088.47
201127
4/16/2020
021745
NIETO-ANDREWS, ALEXIS
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
540.00
540.00
201128
4/16/2020
021741
NILSON, KATHLEEN
REFUND: TEMECULA PRESENTS
80.00
80.00
SHOWS
201129
4/16/2020
000209
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC,
EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINT - STA73
141.70
DBA CROP PRODUCTION
FIRE
SRVCS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINT - STA73 FI
158.28
299.98
201130
4/16/2020
009337
NV5 INC
FEB PROJ MGT SVCS:MRC, PW17-21
39,576.95
39,576.95
201131
4/16/2020
019839
O'CONNOR, DENISE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
140.00
140.00
201132
4/16/2020
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE
VEHICLE MAIN - TCC
1,889.71
1,889.71
201133
4/16/2020
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE
VEHICLE REPAIRS: PARKS &
20.00
20.00
FACILITIES PW
201134
4/16/2020
021735
ORANGE COUNTY YOUTH
REFUND: SOCCER FIELD RENTAL
2,146.00
2,146.00
SPORTS, FRIDAY NIGHT
CANCELLED
LIGHTS FLAG
201135
4/16/2020
002800
PACIFIC STRIPING INC
REPAINTING OF TRAFFIC
193,951.48
STRIPING:CITYWIDE
TRAFFIC STRIPING: BUFFERED BIKE LA
9,080.48
203,031.96
201136
4/16/2020
021202
PEREZ, JOEL C
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
70.00
70.00
201137
4/16/2020
012818
PLANETBIDS INC
ONLINE BID SYSTEM RENEWAL:INFO
28,571.00
28,571.00
TECH
201138
4/16/2020
010338
POOL & ELECTRICAL
VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATIC
196.22
196.22
PRODUCTS INC
FACILITIES
201139
4/16/2020
021758
POSVAR, JORDAN
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
560.00
560.00
Page:12
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201140
4/16/2020
011549
POWER SPORTS UNLIMITED,
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: TEM
DBA BMW MOTORCYCLES OF
SHERIFF
NO
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: TEM SHERIFI
201141
4/16/2020
021775
PRATT, STEPHEN
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201142
4/16/2020
005075
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL
MAR FLR MAT/TWL/UNIFORM
SUPPLY
SVC:CITY FACS
MAR FLR MATS/TWL RNTL:PARKS/CIVIC
FEB FLR MAT/TWL/UNIFORM SVC:CITY F
201143
4/16/2020
020429
REMOTE SATELLITE SYSTEMS
MAR'20 SAT PH AIRTIME/MAY
INT'L
FEE:EOC
201144
4/16/2020
017391
RISE INTERPRETING INC
3/11 INTERPRETING SRVCS:CITY
CLASSES
201145
4/16/2020
000418
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
CEQA NOE-MND(SCH#2020020293
RECORDER
201146
4/16/2020
004822
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY
FEB ROUTE 55 TROLLEY SERVICES
201147
4/16/2020
014347
ROBERTS, PATRICIA G.
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201148
4/16/2020
021772
ROSE AND DAGGER TATTOO
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
LLC
201149 4/16/2020 012251 ROTH, DONALD J
201150 4/16/2020 021773 RYSTIN VENTURES LLC
201151 4/16/2020 004274 SAFE AND SECURE
LOCKSMITH SRVC
201152 4/16/2020 021055 SAMS, ANDREA LAUREN
201153 4/16/2020 021762 SASSCER, KAREN
201154 4/16/2020 011511 SCUBA CENTER TEMECULA
Amount Paid Check Total
250.18
308.01
558.19
540.00
540.00
1,017.65
785.00
821.61
2,624.26
280.00
280.00
156.04 156.04
2,456.75 2,456.75
1,381.18 1,381.18
77.00
77.00
154.00
77.00
231.00 616.00
540.00 540.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
189.00
189.00
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
500.00
500.00
LOCKSMITH SRVCS:CIVIC CENTER
15.23
15.23
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
140.00
140.00
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
520.00
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
10.00
530.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
168.00
168.00
Page:13
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 14
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201155
4/16/2020
021760
SERRANO, JOSE
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201156
4/16/2020
009746
SIGNS BY TOMORROW
SIGN POSTING SRVCS
PA19-1307:PLNG
201157
4/16/2020
013482
SILVERMAN ENTERPRISES
3/23-4112 FACILITY SECURITY:PUMP
INC, DBA BAS SECURITY
TRACK
201158
4/16/2020
015235
SMOKE GUARD CALIFORNIA,
SMOKE GUARD INSPECTIONS:CIVIC
INC.
CENTER
201159
4/16/2020
020545
SOCIAL WORK ACTION GROUP
MAR HOMELESS OUTREACH
SERVICES
201160
4/16/2020
014783
SOFTRESOURCES, LLC
MAR CONSULT: FINANCIAL SYS
UPGRADE MUNIS
201161
4/16/2020
000519
SOUTH COUNTY PEST
MAR PEST CONTROL SRVCS:TES
CONTROL INC
POOL
EMERG PEST CNTRL SRVCS:MAIN STRE
MAR PEST CONTROL SRVCS:MARG SPL
EMERG PEST CNTRL SRVCS:HARVESTC
EMERG PEST CNTRL SRVCS:JRC
EMERG PEST CNTRL SRVCS:TEMEKU H
PEST CONTROL SRVCS:STA 92
PEST CONTROL SRVCS:STA 95
201162
4/16/2020
005786
SPRINT
CELL TOWER DUMP 2/23/20
201163
4/16/2020
019250
ST FRANCIS ELECTRIC LLC
MAR TRAF SGNL MAINT
SVC:YNEZ/TOWN CNTR
MAR TRAF SGNL MAINT SVC:MARG/PAU
201164
4/16/2020
000293
STADIUM PIZZA INC
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201165
4/16/2020
017201
STATEFOODSAFETY.COM
FOOD HANDLERS
CERTIFICATIONS:CRC STAFF
201166
4/16/2020
017814
STC TRAFFIC INC
FEB TRAF SGNL SYS
UPGRADE: HSI P, PW1 9-09
201167
4/16/2020
006145
STENO SOLUTIONS
MAR TRANSCRIPTION SRVCS: TEM
TRANSCRIPTION, SRVCS INC
SHERIFF
201168
4/16/2020
012789
STUART, JENNIFER SARAH
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
Amount Paid Check Total
160.00
400.00
560.00
213.75
213.75
3,129.00
3,129.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
11,332.60
11,332.60
4,070.00
4,070.00
59.00
320.00
49.00
94.00
94.00
94.00
42.00
80.00
832.00
200.00
200.00
7,058.43
7,124.00
14,182.43
250.00
250.00
250.00
750.00
378.00
378.00
11,042.50
11,042.50
91.80
91.80
7,490.00
7,490.00
Page:14
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201169
4/16/2020
009061
STURDIVANT, ANGELA P
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201170
4/16/2020
021777
T & R ROOFING INC
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201171
4/16/2020
021361
TELECOM LAW FIRM PC F/N/A,
MAR LEGAL SRVCS: PLANNING
KRAMER TELECOM LAW FIRM
201172
4/16/2020
003677
TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: TEM
LLC
SHERIFF
201173
4/16/2020
009948
TEMECULA PERFORMING
REFUND:SEC.DEPOSIT THEATER
ARTS CO
201174
4/16/2020
021778
TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITAL
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
INC
201175
4/16/2020
000306
TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE &
PLUMBING SUPPLIES:CRC
SUPPLY
IRRIGATION/PLUMBING SUPPLIES:VAR F
201176
4/16/2020
021236
TEMECULA YOUTH SPORTS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
LEAGUES
201177
4/16/2020
021779
TEN9 INC
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201178
4/16/2020
021780
THORNTON WINERY
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
201179
4/16/2020
021755
THRAPP, JESSICA
REFUND: LIFEGUARD TRAINING
CANCELLED
201180
4/16/2020
016311
TIERCE, NICHOLAS
GRAPHIC DSGN SVCS: THEATER
201181
4/16/2020
016126
TONY TOBIN ELEMENTARY
REFUND: TVM FIELD TRIP CANCELLED
201182
4/16/2020
021768
TOSCH, NANCY
REFUND: MOTHER'S DAY TEA PARTY
CANCELLED
201183
4/16/2020
021580
TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS
APR CONSULT SRVCS:CITY
INC
CLERK/CITY MGR OF
201184
4/16/2020
021736
TRILLO, JOHANNA
REFUND: MISS MICHELLE'S TINY
TOT'S
201185
4/16/2020
021739
TRIPLE R SPORTS GROUP
REFUND: SOCCER FIELD RENTAL
CANCELLED
REFUND: SOCCER FIELD RENTAL CANC
Amount Paid Check Total
78.40
70.00
148.40
520.00
520.00
1,131.50
1,131.50
2,620.51
2,620.51
500.00
500.00
1,130.00
1,130.00
87.39
486.90
574.29
2,200.00
2,200.00
290.00
290.00
500.00
500.00
175.00
175.00
4,320.00
4,320.00
324.00
324.00
10.00
10.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
120.00
120.00
3,962.00
144.00
4,106.00
Page:15
apChkLst
04/16/2020
11:28:09AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 16
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201186
4/16/2020
020963
UPTOWN TEMECULAAUTO
JAN VEH. DETAILING SRVCS:BLDG &
16.00
SPA LLC
SAFETY
JAN VEH. DETAILING SRVCS:PW PARKS
4.00
JAN VEH. DETAILING SRVCS:PW PARKS
4.00
JAN VEH. DETAILING SRVCS:PW STREE
4.00
DEC VEH. DETAILING SRVCS:13LDG & SP
8.00
JAN VEH. DETAILING SRVCS:CODE ENP
4.00
JAN VEH. DETAILING SRVCS:FIRE PREV
16.00
56.00
201187
4/16/2020
014848
VALUTEC CARD SOLUTIONS
MAR TICKETING SRVCS:THEATER
135.66
135.66
LLC
201188
4/16/2020
021782
VANTAGEAUCTIONS
REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
250.00
250.00
201189
4/16/2020
018174
VCA PET MEDICAL CENTER,
VET CARE: TEMECULA POLICE K9
533.81
533.81
DBA VCAANIMAL HOSPITALS
201190
4/16/2020
009101
VISION ONE INC, DBA
MAR SHOWARE TICKETING
580.40
580.40
ACCESSO SHOWARE
SRVCS:THEATER
201191
4/16/2020
018147
WADDLETON, JEFFREY L.
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
140.00
140.00
201192
4/16/2020
006248
WALKER, JESSICA
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
14.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
140.00
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
269.50
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
14.00
437.50
201193
4/16/2020
020275
WALLACE & ASSOC
MAR CONSTR INSPECTION SRVCS:PW
10,664.00
10,664.00
CONSULTING INC
DEPTS
201194
4/16/2020
021769
WALLBANK, PATRICIA
REFUND: MOTHER'S DAY TEA PARTY
10.00
10.00
CANCELLED
201195
4/16/2020
003730
WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC
3/1-15 TREE MAINT: CITYWIDE R-O-W
14,672.90
14,672.90
201196
4/16/2020
012343
WEST COAST PERFORMING,
REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT/19-20
500.00
500.00
ARTS PRESENTERS
SEASON
201197
4/16/2020
021148
WEX BANK
3/7-4/6 FUEL USE: TEM PD
1,029.92
1,029.92
201198
4/16/2020
005118
WILLCOX, GWEN
REIMB: CPRS CONF: 3/10-3/12
947.87
947.87
201199
4/16/2020
000341
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC
FEB TRAF ENG SRVCS:REDHAWK/VAIL
6,491.50
6,491.50
RNCH
Page:16
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 17
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201200
4/16/2020
018871
WONDER SCIENCE
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
201201
4/16/2020
021024
YANES BLANCAA, DBA DE
SEP CONSULT SVC: PLANNING
GANGE CONSULTING
OCT CONSULT SVC: PLANNING
201202
4/16/2020
003776
ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION,
PARAMEDIC EQUIP SUPPLIES: MEDIC
GPO
Amount Paid Check Total
472.50
283.50 756.00
5,955.00
1,750.00 7,705.00
1,408.49 1,408.49
Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,033,937.40
Page:17
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 18
04/16/2020 11:28:09AM CITY OF TEMECULA
215 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 1,033,937.40
Page:18
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
04/16/2020 4:26:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK
Check # Date Vendor
201203 4/16/2020 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES
INC
201204 4/16/2020 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J,
DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
BOOKS: LIBRARY
365.04
SUPPLIES:HUMAN SVCS PGMS
325.78
SUPPLIES:TVM EVENTS
315.98
SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: HR
291.00
SUPPLIES:SPECIAL EVENTS
238.38
MISC OFC SUPPLIES:MALL STOREFRON
154.05
BOOKS: LIBRARY
150.98
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
132.34
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
120.55
BOOKS: LIBRARY
102.73
BOOKS: LIBRARY
84.80
MISC SUPPLIES: ECON DEV
62.34
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
48.88
SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK
35.92
OFC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY
30.42
Office Supplies: HR
28.25
BOOKS: LIBRARY
-11.07
2,476.37
GRAPHIC DESIGN:TCSD ADMIN
2,250.00
2,250.00
Grand total for UNION BANK:
4,726.37
Page:1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
04/16/2020 4:26:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA
2 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 4,726.37
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
8403
4/1/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
FEB WATER MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS
DIST
8409
4/1/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
FEB WATER 39569 SERAPHINA RD
DIST
8434
4/1/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAR INTERNET SVCS- SENIOR
CENTER
8435
4/1/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAR INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
8436
4/1/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAR INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
8472
4/6/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAR INTERNET SVCS- 32364
OVERLAND TRL
8473
4/7/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 29119
MARGARITA RD
8474
4/6/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAR INTERNET SVCS- 40820
WINCHESTER RD
8475
4/6/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAR INTERNET SVCS- 28300
MERCEDES ST
8476
4/9/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
APR INTERNET SVCS- THEATRE
8477
4/2/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAR INTERENT SVCS- LIBRARY
8478
4/2/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAR INTERNET SVCS- FIRE STATION
73
8490
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 133-040-7373-0 43210 BUS PK DR
8491
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 060-293-3315-7 28922 PUJOL ST
8492
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 101-525-0950-0 28816 PUJOL ST
8493
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 181-383-8881-6 28314 MERCEDES
ST
Amount Paid Check Total
32.82
32.82
286.84
286.84
150.98
150.98
2,728.61
2,728.61
5,367.10
5,367.10
58.99
58.99
348.49
348.49
586.83
586.83
586.83
586.83
150.98
150.98
190.98
190.98
121.84
121.84
17.60
17.60
62.80
62.80
79.33
79.33
79.33
79.33
Page:1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
8494
4/10/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 098-255-9828-8 29119 MARGARITA
RD
8495
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 028-025-1468-3 41375 MCCABE CT
8496
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 196-025-0344-3 42081 MAIN ST
8497
4/10/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 117-188-6393-6 32131 S LOOP RD
8498
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 129-582-9784-3 43230 BUS PARK
DR
8500
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 095-167-7907-2 30650 PAUBA RD
8501
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 026-671-2909-8 42051 MAIN ST
8503
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 021-725-0775-4 41845 6TH ST
8504
4/9/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 101-525-1560-6 27415
ENTERPRISE CIR
8505
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 125-244-2108-3 30600 PAUBA RD
8506
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 129-535-4236-7 41000 MAIN ST
8507
4/7/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 091-024-9300-5 30875 RANCHO
VISTA RD
8508
4/2/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
FEB WATER MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS
DIST
8509
4/2/2020
001986
MUZAK LLC
APR DISH NETWORK 41952 6TH ST
8510
4/2/2020
001986
MUZAK LLC
APR DISH NETWORK 32131
BUTTERFIELD STG
8511
4/2/2020
001986
MUZAK LLC
APR DISH NETWORK 43230 BUS PARK
DR
8539
4/3/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-21-981-4720 30153 TEM PKWY
Amount Paid Check Total
88.80
88.80
90.36
90.36
118.10
118.10
156.82
156.82
167.51
167.51
210.86
210.86
253.49
253.49
283.24
283.24
342.92
342.92
531.97
531.97
1,857.08
1,857.08
2,913.33
2,913.33
90.60
90.60
56.10
56.10
155.08
155.08
166.27
166.27
16.84
16.84
Paget
apChkLst
04/23/2020
12:04:33PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 3
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
8540
4/3/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-41-072-5246 29429 TEM PKWY
34.13
34.13
8541
4/3/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-28-904-7706 32329 OVERLAND
131.60
131.60
TRL
8542
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-35-421-1260 41955 4TH ST
10.62
10.62
8543
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-419-2873 43000 HWY 395
10.70
10.70
8544
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-657-2787 41638
10.80
10.80
WINCHESTER RD
8545
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-39-732-3171 41997 MARGARITA
10.80
10.80
RD
8546
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-34-333-3589 41702 MAIN ST
10.96
10.96
8547
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-807-1093 28079 DIAZ RD
11.06
11.06
8548
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-807-1226 28077 DIAZ RD
11.06
11.06
8549
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-282-0665 27407 DIAZ RD
11.61
11.61
8550
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-031-2616 27991 DIAZ RD
11.61
11.61
8551
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-953-8249 46497 WOLF
13.26
13.26
CREEK DR
8552
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-953-8082 31523 WOLF
14.41
14.41
VALLEY RD
8553
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-14-204-1615 30027 FRONT ST
21.91
21.91
8554
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-35-707-0010 33451 S HWY 79
22.55
22.55
8555
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-41-502-0478 28402 MERCEDES
24.21
24.21
ST
8556
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-41-812-6629 42061 MAIN ST
28.45
28.45
Page3
apChkLst
04/23/2020
12:04:33PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 4
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
8557
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-42-065-5359 27602 STANFORD
41.25
41.25
DR
8558
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-536-3481 41902 MAIN ST
132.49
132.49
8559
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-41-048-2012 30498 TEM PKWY
142.75
142.75
8560
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-02-502-8077 43210 BUS PARK
242.40
242.40
DR
8561
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-19-171-8568 28300 MERCEDES
352.09
352.09
ST
8562
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-223-8607 41000 MAIN ST
395.24
395.24
8563
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-35-664-9053 29119 MARGARITA
424.70
424.70
RD
8564
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-18-937-3152 28314 MERCEDES
435.90
435.90
ST
8565
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-25-393-4681 41951 MORAGA RD
691.49
691.49
8566
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-295-3510 32211 WOLF
781.60
781.60
VALLEY RD
8567
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-02-351-4946 41845 6TH ST
837.03
837.03
8568
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-30-520-4414 32781 TEM PKWY
936.63
936.63
8569
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-00-397-5067 40499 CALLE
937.12
937.12
MEDUSA
8570
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-35-403-6337 41375 MCCABE CT
979.68
979.68
8571
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-536-3655 41904 MAIN ST
1,261.03
1,261.03
8572
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-912-7494 28690 MERCEDES
1,539.46
1,539.46
ST
8573
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-224-0173 32364 OVERLAND
1,600.05
1,600.05
TL
Page:4
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
8574
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8575
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8576
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8577
4/6/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8578
4/8/2020
014486
VERIZON WIRELESS
8579
4/7/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8580
4/7/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8581
4/7/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8582
4/7/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8583
4/8/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
8584
4/8/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
8585
4/8/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
8586
4/8/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
8587
4/8/2020
014486
VERIZON WIRELESS
8588
4/10/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
(Continued)
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
MAR 2-31-536-3226 28690 MERCEDES
1,610.33
1,610.33
ST
MAR 2-29-933-3831 43230 BUS PARK
1,987.69
1,987.69
DR
MAR 2-00-397-5042 43200 BUS PARK
3,025.82
3,025.82
DR
MAR 2-32-903-8293 41000 MAIN ST
15,124.42
15,124.42
02/16-03/15
9,092.38
9,092.38
CELLULAR/BROADBAN D:C ITYW I DE
MAR 2-29-657-2332 45538 REDWOOD
10.94
10.94
RD
MAR 2-29-953-8447 31738 WOLF
10.94
10.94
VALLEY RD
MAR 2-30-220-8749 45850 N WOLF
389.25
389.25
CREEK
MAR 2-31-404-6020 28771 OLD TOWN
606.65
606.65
FRONT
APR INTERNET SVCS- 32211 WOLF
191.00
191.00
VALLEY RD
APR INTERNET SVCS- 30755 AULD RD
694.99
694.99
APR INTERNET SVCS- 41973 6TH ST
694.99
694.99
APR INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST
3,430.75
3,430.75
02/11-3/10 TASK FORCE TABLETS
445.92
445.92
POLICE
MAR 2-28-629-0507 30600 PAUBA RD 5,540.92 5,540.92
Page:5
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK
Check # Date
Vendor
8600 4/9/2020
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
001264
COSTCO TEMECULA 491
009720
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
009720
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
8601 4/9/2020
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
018323
GOAT & VINE, THE
000152
CALIF PARKS AND
RECREATION SOC, C P R S
015626
EVENTBRITE.COM
8602 4/9/2020
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
017360
FIVERR, INC.
017360
FIVERR, INC.
020838
RIVERSIDE CENTRE PARKING
017360
FIVERR, INC.
008735
APPLEBEE'S NEIGHBORHOOD
GRILL
021795
OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE
007987
WALMART
020489
GREYHOUND LINES
8604 4/9/2020
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
008956
PANERA BREAD
000515
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER
OF, COMMERCE
8605 4/9/2020
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
015094
SPUNTINO
021723
COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF
017570
AMERICAN HEART
ASSOCIATION INC
008669
VONS
(Continued)
Description
Amount Paid Check Total
ZH RFRSHMNTS: DUI WARRANT
112.07
SWEEP
ZH RFRSHMNTS: EXTENDED
17.95
ASSIGNMENT
ZH RFRSHMNTS: EXTENDED
71.80 201.82
ASSIGNMENT
ZS RFRSHMNTS: RTA SW T-NOW MTG 106.57
2/26
ZS CPRS CONF & AWARD MTG 310.00
ZS 2020 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL MTG 80.00 496.57
RG HOMELESS OUTREACH MODEL
362.25
PRESENTATION
RG HOMELESS OUTREACH MODEL
162.75
PRESENTATION
RG PARKING FEE: SHERIFF MTG: 2/27
5.25
RG HOMESLESS OUTREACH MODEL
78.75
PRESENTATION
RG RFRSHMNTS: GRANT WRITING
33.16
CONF: 3/4
RG RFRSHMNTS: GRANT WRITING
33.68
CONF: 3/5
RG SUPPLIES: HELP CTR
92.04
RG HOMESLESS OUTREACH: BUS 185.99 953.87
TICKET
PT RFRSHMNTS: RCTC SMART FWY 201.37
MTG
PT'20 STATE OF THE CITY: PW 950.00 1,151.37
WW RFRSHMNTS: CAPTAINS MTG 3/5
410.53
WW RFRSHMNTS: CAPTAINS MTG 3/5
50.85
WW CPR CLASS MATLS: CLASS
850.00
CARDS
WW RFRSHMNTS: CAPTAINS MTG 3/10
191.11 1,502.49
Page6
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK
Check # Date Vendor
8606 4/9/2020 006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
021800
FEDERALAVIATIONADMINIST.
DBA FAA
006552
PAINTED EARTH
000515
TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER
OF, COMMERCE
021274
ZOOM.US
017716
CLEVERBRIDGE INC
021799
WE TRANSFER
8607 4/9/2020 006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
006117
PEONY CHINESE CUISINE
001264
COSTCO TEMECULA 491
021478
DISCOUNTMUGS.COM
008956
PANERA BREAD
000305
TARGET BANK BUS CARD
SRVCS
001264
COSTCO TEMECULA 491
017899
HAVANA FOODS. INC
(Continued)
Description
Amount Paid Check Total
MH DRONE REGISTRATION: INFO
5.00
TECH
MH EVENT DEPOSIT. INFO TECH DEPT
50.00
MH STATE OF THE CITY REGIST: INFO
150.00
TECH
MH MONTHLY RENEWAL FEE: INFO
386.90
TECH
MH SOFTWARE RENEWAL: INFO TECH
995.00
MH SFTWR FOR FILE TRANSFER
120.00 1,706.90
AA RFRSHMNTS: STAFF REIMBURSED:
76.05
MTG 2/25
AA RFRSHMNTS: RTAT-NOW SW MTG
68.28
AA'20 STATE OF THE CITY TOOL KITS
2,909.72
AA RFRSHMNTS: STAFF REIMBURSED:
80.67
MTG 3/10
AA SOAP PUMP DISPENSER: CITY
6.51
MGR
AA RFRSHMNTS: COUNCIL BUSINESS
21.90
MTGS
AA RFRSHMNTS: STAFF REIMBURSED:
96.90 3,260.03
MTG 2/11
Page:?
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check # Date
Vendor
Description
8608 4/9/2020
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
013338
APPLE STORE
GB MACBOOK AIR & APPLE CARE:
BUTLER
021783
BUFFALO WILD WINGS
GB RFRSHMNTS: TEMECULA EATS
EVENT
021477
ECO GREEN CLEANERS
GB DRY CLEAN SVCS: TABLE CLOTHS:
ECO DEV
004432
ALBERTSONS GROCERY
GB RFRSHMNTS: EVENTS: HR & ECO
STORE
DEV
013812
DFIT SUBS LLC, DBA JERSEY
GB RFRSHMNTS: MENTORSHIP KICK
MIKES
OFF EVENT
010046
TV CONVENTION &VISITORS
GB SPONSORSHIP TABLE: XENIA
BUREAU, DBA VISIT TEMECULA
AWARDS
VALLEY
013338
APPLE STORE
GB COMPUTER SUPPLIES: INFO TECH
019592
URBAN CAFE
GB RFRSHMNTS: UTILITY ROUND
TABLE EVENT
019592
URBAN CAFE
GB RFRSHMNTS: EDC MTG
013338
APPLE STORE
GB ADD'L PHONE STORAGE: BEMOLL,
B.
010046
TV CONVENTION &VISITORS
GB SPONSORSHIP TABLE: XENIA
BUREAU, DBA VISIT TEMECULA
AWARDS
VALLEY
003751
RIVERSIDE CO EDUCATION
GB REGIST: STATE OF THE CITY:
OFFICE
WALKER
006937
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES
GB AIRFARE: GOVT SOCIAL MEDIA
CONF:BORU
013338
APPLE STORE
GB ADD'L PHONE STORAGE: BEMOLL,
B.
8610 4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-36-122-7820 31777 DE PORTOLA
RD
8611 4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-25-350-5119 45602 REDHAWK
PKWY
8612 4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-031-2590 28301 RANCHO CAL
RD
8613 4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-936-3511 46488 PECHANGA
PKWY
8614 4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-36-531-7916 44205 MAIN ST
8615 4/13/2020 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-40-380-2424 40750
BUTTERFIELD STG
Amount Paid Check Total
2,318.16
75.56
51.84
41.40
150.00
250.00
194.66
591.38
255.99
0.99
-250.00
42.00
-229.00
0.99 3,493.97
10.94 10.94
13.77 13.77
13.80 13.80
23.84 23.84
71.34 71.34
80.53 80.53
Page:8
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
8616
4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8617
4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8618
4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8619
4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8620
4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8621
4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8622
4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8623
4/13/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8624
4/14/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8625
4/14/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8626
4/14/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8627
4/14/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8628
4/14/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8631
4/15/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
8632
4/16/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
8633
4/16/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
8634
4/17/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
(Continued)
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
MAR 2-41-394-3267 46899 REDHAWK
91.11
91.11
PKWY
MAR 2-29-657-2563 42902
94.78
94.78
BUTTERFIELD STG
MAR 2-29-479-2981 31454 TEM PKWY
101.39
101.39
MAR 2-29-458-7548 32000 RANCHO
173.84
173.84
CAL
MAR 2-10-331-2153 28816 PUJOL ST
519.80
519.80
MAR 2-20-798-3248 42081 MAIN ST
944.51
944.51
MAR 2-27-560-0625 32380
2,198.52
2,198.52
DEERHOLLOW WAY
MAR 2-27-805-3194 42051 MAIN ST
2,416.74
2,416.74
MAR 2-30-066-2889 30051 RANCHO
11.06
11.06
VISTA RD
MAR 2-40-765-3021 28916 PUJOL ST
27.97
27.97
MAR 2-40-765-3179 28922 PUJOL ST
77.53
77.53
MAR 2-02-351-5281 30875 RANCHO
2,859.92
2,859.92
VISTA RD
MAR 2-05-791-8807 31587 TEM PKWY
8,090.09
8,090.09
APR INTERNET SVCS- 40820
5.30
5.30
WINCHESTER RD
APR INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST
1,163.23
1,163.23
APR INTERNET SVCS- EOC 138.20 138.20
APR INTERNET SVCS- LIBRARY 5.31 5.31
Page9
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
8635
4/17/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
APR INTERNET SVCS- LIBRARY
8636
4/20/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-223-9571 30395 MURRIETA
HOT SPR
8637
4/20/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-33-237-4818 30499 RANCHO
CAL
8638
4/20/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-419-2659 26706 YNEZ RD
8639
4/20/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-974-7899 26953 YNEZ RD
8640
4/20/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-30-608-9384 28582 HARVESTON
DR
8641
4/20/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-28-171-2620 40820
WINCHESTER RD
8642
4/20/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-26-887-0789 40233 VILLAGE RD
8643
4/20/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-00-397-5059 33340 CAMINO
PIEDRA
8644
4/20/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 32131 S LOOP
RD
8645
4/20/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST
8646
4/20/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 28816 PUJOL ST
8647
4/16/2020
021434
MATRIX TELECOM LLC DBA
MAR 800 SERVICES: CIVIC CENTER
LINGO
8648
4/21/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 091-085-1632-0 41951 MORAGA
RD
8649
4/21/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
MAR WATER- 31991 RORIPAUGH
DIST
VALLEY RD
8650
4/21/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
MAR WATER- 31991 RORIPAUGH
DIST
VALLEY RD
8651
4/21/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-29-974-7568 26953 YNEZ RD
Amount Paid Check Total
5.31
5.31
10.94
10.94
104.25
104.25
129.40
129.40
153.80
153.80
318.42
318.42
397.35
397.35
1,184.35
1,184.35
3,313.77
3,313.77
237.21
237.21
282.12
282.12
586.83
586.83
65.46
65.46
718.47
718.47
86.92
86.92
363.42
363.42
100.32
100.32
Page:10
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
8652
4/21/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-31-693-9784 26036 YNEZ RD
201205
4/23/2020
001517
AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
MAY EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PGRM:
LLC, DBA AETNA RESOURCES
HR
201206
4/23/2020
009787
ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC
EQUIPMENT REPAIR: PUBLIC WORKS
201207
4/23/2020
007282
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION
INC
FIRE
BOOKS: LIBRARY
Misc. office supplies: prevention fire
201208
4/23/2020
004422
AMERICAN BATTERY
BATTERIES: CIVIC CTR
CORPORATION, DBA
AMERICAN BATTERY SUP
201209
4/23/2020
004240
AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES
DUI DRUG & ALCOHOL SCREENING
AFN
201210
4/23/2020
020762
AT&T
PD FILE CODE 2948830
3/20-4/1 /20 TE200650130
201211
4/23/2020
019709
BAGDASARIAN, NADYA
REIMB: UNIFORMS: CODE ENF
201212
4/23/2020
012849
BECERRA, WILL
EE CMPTR PURCHASE PRGM:
BECERRA, W.
201213
4/23/2020
004262
BIO TOX LABORATORIES
PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF
PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF
PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF
201214
4/23/2020
019559
BMW MOTORCYCLES OF
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: TEM
RIVERSIDE
SHERIFF
201215
4/23/2020
018408
BOB CALLAHAN'S POOL
APR POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT: VAR
SERVICE
FACS
APR POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT: VAR F
201216
4/23/2020
003138
CAL MAT, DBA VULCAN
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
MATERIALS CO
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
201217
4/23/2020
013265
CALIF BUILDING, STANDARDS
1ST QTR PAYMENT OF SB1473 2020
COMMISSION
201218
4/23/2020
004248
CALIF DEPT OF
JAN BLOOD & ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:
JUSTICE-ACCTING
TEM SHERIF
MAR BLOOD &ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: TEN
201219
4/23/2020
004971
CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
APR 11 CANON COPIERS LEASE:
INC
LIBRARY
Amount Paid Check Total
319.74
319.74
836.00
836.00
216.51 216.51
22.77
122.15
30.44 175.36
241.24 241.24
371.50 371.50
95.00
400.00 495.00
198.14 198.14
666.00 666.00
909.00
2,017.00
475.00 3,401.00
1,752.70 1,752.70
950.00
1,100.00 2,050.00
172.36
411.44 583.80
1.115.00 1.115.00
35.00
875.00 910.00
671.56 671.56
Page:11
apChkLst
04/23/2020
12:04:33PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 12
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201220
4/23/2020
004462
CDW LLC, DBACDW
COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES: HALL,
643.55
GOVERNMENT LLC
J.
COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES: HAWK, T
1,029.22
COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES: RICHTER,
643.55
COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES: RICHTER,
1,029.22
COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES: KUHN, S.
643.55
KEYBOARD & MOUSE REPLACEMENT: IT
393.45
COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES: HAWK, T
643.55
REPLACEMENT TV:TRAINING ROOM
-1,842.52
3,183.57
201221
4/23/2020
020455
CHS EDUCATION
VOID - REFUND: CRC RENTAL 5/18/20
0.00
0.00
FOUNDATION, BASEBALL
CANCELLED
201222
4/23/2020
000442
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
UPDATE ALARM SYSTEM: MPSC
2,074.00
2,074.00
201223
4/23/2020
001264
COSTCO TEMECULA 491
MISC STATION SUPPLIES: STA 95 FIRE
59.62
59.62
201224
4/23/2020
020105
CUMBERBATCH, JAMAL
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
84.00
CREDIT: TAX WITHHOLDING CASE 1863175
-21.00
63.00
201225
4/23/2020
003272
DAISYECO INC
PRINTER & PLOTTER
3,164.41
SUPPLIES:GIS/CIVIC
PRINTER & PLOTTER SUPPLIES:GIS/CIVIC CTR
-1,200.26
1,964.15
201226
4/23/2020
020648
DG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS 2
CITYWIDE SURVEILLANCE
251,485.98
INC, CONVERGINT
TECHNOLOGIES
2 CARD READERS FOR NEW DOORS:COM DEV
3,132.82
254,618.80
201227
4/23/2020
003945
DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL
PORTABLE RESTROOM/SINK RENTAL:
109.95
109.95
SRVCS
PD
201228
4/23/2020
004192
DOWNS ENERGY FUEL
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD
133.58
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC DIV
129.89
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAINT
829.85
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PW CIP
59.42
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPEC
43.43
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFORCEMENT
22.22
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV
107.47
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT
518.92
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT
21.75
1,866.53
201229
4/23/2020
018098
ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT
MAY 20 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN:
1,250.00
1,250.00
INC
WRKRS COM
201230
4/23/2020
021786
ELIZONDO, MONICA
REFUND: CRC RENTAL CANCELLED
660.00
660.00
201231
4/23/2020
002577
ENGINEERING RESOURCES
DSGN ENG SVCS: RANCHO CALIF
1,107.00
1,107.00
PW19-19
Page:12
apChkLst
04/23/2020
12:04:33PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 13
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201232
4/23/2020
011292
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
1/1-3/31 PREP OF SEIR HARVESTON
11,301.40
11,301.40
ASSOC
GPA & SP
201233
4/23/2020
001056
EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC
APR LDSCP MAINT: MEDIANS
21,133.27
APR OVERLAND EXTENSION PROJ LDS(
300.00
APR LDSCP MAINT: CITY FACS
13,379.15
APR LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS PV\
57,870.52
APR LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS PV1
58,921.01
APR LDSCP MAINT SLOPES: PW
24,635.75
APR LDSCP MAINT SLOPES: PW
40,615.26
216,854.96
201234
4/23/2020
020921
FLETCHER, COURTNEY
EE CMPTR PURCHASE PRGM:
1,250.23
1,250.23
FLETCHER, C.
201235
4/23/2020
019651
FOX, JAYME
EE CMPTR PURCHASE PRGM: FOX, J.
1,907.04
1,907.04
201236
4/23/2020
002982
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
JAN-MAR 330383649 2018 FORM 592
805.00
805.00
201237
4/23/2020
002982
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
CUMBERBATCH, JAMAL - CASE#
21.00
21.00
1863175
201238
4/23/2020
002982
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
10.88
10.88
201239
4/23/2020
012066
GEOCON WEST INC
FEB GEOTECH SVCS:PECH.PKWY,
3,092.50
3,092.50
PW15-14
201240
4/23/2020
021365
GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INC
MAR CLAIM ADJUSTER SVCS: HR
2,862.00
2,862.00
201241
4/23/2020
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 95
16.68
INC
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
7.53
24.21
201242
4/23/2020
021796
GRIFFITS, CATLIN
EE CMPTR PURCHASE PRGM:
1,350.00
1,350.00
GRIFFITS, C.
201243
4/23/2020
017137
GUIZAR, MERCEDES
REFUND: CRC RENTAL 5/9/20
638.00
638.00
CANCELLED
201244
4/23/2020
003342
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY,
CRITICAL HOME REPAIRS PRGM:
5,423.64
5,423.64
INLAND VALLEY INC
CDBG
201245
4/23/2020
017334
HOUSE OF AUTOMATION INC
BAY DOOR SVC - STA95
1,188.00
1,188.00
201246
4/23/2020
013286
INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC
APR ENTERPRISE 911 SVC: IT
300.00
300.00
Page:13
apChkLst
04/23/2020
12:04:33PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 14
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201247
4/23/2020
021792
KELLISON, JIM
REFUND: HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE
48.00
48.00
DAME SHOW
201248
4/23/2020
001282
KNORR SYSTEMS INC
Certified Aquatic Facilities Op Training
395.00
395.00
201249
4/23/2020
017118
KRACH BREE B, DBA
NAME PLATE: DAISEN: TCSD
43.50
TEMECULA TROPHY& DES
CREDIT:TAX WITHHOLDING CASE 6030U
-10.88
32.62
201250
4/23/2020
014432
LANAIR GROUP LLC
MITEL REPLACEMENT
36,578.77
36,578.77
SWITCHES:INFO TECH
201251
4/23/2020
003726
LIFE ASSIST INC
EMERGENCY MED SUPPLIES - MEDIC
679.69
EMERGENCY MEDICAL EQUIP: MEDIC
271.88
951.57
201252
4/23/2020
018253
LOPEZ, OSCAR
EE CMPTR PURCHASE PRGM:
1,959.60
1,959.60
LOPEZ, OSCAR
201253
4/23/2020
004141
MAINTEX INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES: COVID
380.61
380.61
201254
4/23/2020
019823
MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC
DEEP CLEANING: TCC: COVID 19
500.00
SANITATION
DEEP CLEANING: TCC: COVID 19 SANITATION
700.00
1,200.00
201255
4/23/2020
013827
MIKO MOUNTAINLION INC
SLURRY FILL ERODED CHANNEL:
10,546.00
WOLF CREEK
CHANNEL CLEAN-UP: VIA LOBO
31,200.00
STREET REPAIRS: VIA DOS PICOS/DMV
1,848.00
43,594.00
201256
4/23/2020
004043
MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
25.23
INC
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
211.11
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY
169.42
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY
153.44
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY
126.59
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY
178.85
864.64
201257
4/23/2020
021714
MIYAMOTO, SUSAN
REFUND: LIBRARY ROOM RENTAL
96.00
96.00
5/9/20
201258
4/23/2020
004586
MOORE FENCE COMPANY INC
REPLACE SAFETY FENCE: EMPIRE
3,777.35
3,777.35
CREEK
201259
4/23/2020
015164
NATURES IMAGE INC
RET RELEASE: PW11-01 PECHANGA
3,124.44
3,124.44
PKWY
201260
4/23/2020
018716
NCL INC, TEMECULA VALLEY
REFUND: CRC RENTAL 5/31/20
374.00
374.00
CHAPTER
CANCELLED
Page:14
apChkLst
04/23/2020
12:04:33PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 15
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201261
4/23/2020
001323
NESTLE WATERS NORTH
3/11-4/10 WTR DLVRY SVC: FOC
112.17
AMERICA, DBA
READYREFRESH
3/11-4/10 WTR DLVRY SVC: TVE2
28.69
2/23-3/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: MRC
47.51
188.37
201262
4/23/2020
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE
VEHICLE/EQUIP REPAIRS: PW STREET
1,178.19
1,178.19
MAINT
201263
4/23/2020
002072
RANCHO CALIF WATER
RRSP RESTROOM EXPANSION:
1,500.00
1,500.00
DIST-FEES
PW18-03
201264
4/23/2020
003591
RENES COMMERCIAL
CLEAN-UP WEED ABATEMENT: CITY
5,007.00
MANAGEMENT
ROW
HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEAN-UP P'
2,130.00
CLEAN-UP WEED ABATEMENT: CITY ROB
1,774.00
8,911.00
201265
4/23/2020
004822
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY
MAR ROUTE 55 TROLLEY SERVICES
690.59
690.59
201266
4/23/2020
021791
RODRIGUEZ, YOLANDA
REFUND: WILLY WONKA SHOW
135.00
135.00
CANCELLED
201267
4/23/2020
016778
ROW TRAFFIC SAFETY, INC.
ROAD BARRICADES: PW STREET
6,145.73
6,145.73
MAINT
201268
4/23/2020
000519
SOUTH COUNTY PEST
APR PEST CONTROL SRVCS:PBSP
70.00
CONTROL INC
APR PEST CONTROL SRVCS:DUCK PON
49.00
119.00
201269
4/23/2020
012652
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,
APR GEN USAGE: 0141,0839,2593,9306
605.31
605.31
TELEPHONE COMPANY
201270
4/23/2020
008337
STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
38.78
OFFICE SUPPLIES: FINANCE
30.10
OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE
40.57
OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE
31.40
OFFICE SUPPLIES:POLICE MALL STORE
44.09
OFFICE SUPPLIES:MPSC
48.93
OFFICE SUPPLIES:MPSC
526.47
760.34
201271
4/23/2020
021790
STRATA WATERSTONE LLC
HOMELESS PREVENTION
1,660.00
1,660.00
PRGM:TORABI
201272
4/23/2020
010046
TV CONVENTION &VISITORS
FEB'20 BUS. IMPRV DISTRICT
84,578.07
84,578.07
BUREAU, DBA VISIT TEMECULA
ASMNTS
VALLEY
201273
4/23/2020
009194
VILLAGE NEWS, INC
PUBLICATION: CORONAVIRUS
850.00
850.00
UPDATE SHEET
Page:15
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 16
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201274
4/23/2020
020275
WALLACE & ASSOC
MAR CONSTR MGMT:PECH.PKWY,
CONSULTING INC
PW15-14
201275
4/23/2020
019375
WARD, ROSANNE
EE CMPTR PURCHASE PRGM: WARD,
R.
201276
4/23/2020
001342
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES:OLD TOWN
MAINT
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES:CRC
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES:CIVIC CENTER
201277
4/23/2020
013556
WESTERN AV
VIDEO TELECONFERENCING EQUIP:IT
DEPT
Amount Paid Check Total
10,177.00
1,391.65
156.67
156.67
114.37
1.000.00
Grand total for UNION BANK:
10,177.00
1,391.65
427.71
1,000.00
854,969.83
Page:16
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 17
04/23/2020 12:04:33PM CITY OF TEMECULA
204 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 854,969.83
Page:17
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
04/30/2020 10:47:01AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date Vendor
8599
4/9/2020 006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
021665
YEOBILL.COM UK
020489
GREYHOUND LINES
8603
4/9/2020 006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
021453
SACRAMENTO BEE
021453
SACRAMENTO BEE
000912
CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF
012915
LUCILLE'S BBC
021793
THE LINE, DC HOTEL
012915
LUCILLE'S BBQ
007047
OLIVE GARDEN
014779
TOWN CENTER CLEANERS
005531
FRONT STREET BAR & GRILL
DBA, BAILY WINE COUNTRY
CAFE
018323
GOAT & VINE, THE
000912
CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF
015496
SAN DIEGO AIRPORT PARKING
000912
CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF
000912
CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF
8629
4/23/2020 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT)
8630
4/23/2020 000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT)
8653
4/17/2020 000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER
DISTRICT
8654
4/22/2020 002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DIST
Description Amount Paid Check Total
RM WEBSITE SUBSCRIPTION SVC: 9.99
POLICE
RM HOMELESS OUTREACH: BUS 62.00 71.99
TICKET
RO SUBSCRIPTION: ONLINE DIGITAL
12.99
SUBSCRIP
RO SUBSCRIPTION: ONLINE DIGITAL
12.99
SUBSCRIP
RO CREDIT: DIALOGUE REGIST: JOHL
-150.00
& RAMIR
RO CREDIT FOR CHARGE ON 03-24
-350.50
RO LODGING:CONGR CITY CONF
962.13
R.JOHL 3/8-11
RO SEE CREDIT DATED 03-24
350.50
RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL CLOSED
262.55
SESS 03/1
RO DRY CLEANING FOR TABLE
234.00
LINENS: CLERK
RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL CLOSED
183.79
SESS 02/2
RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL CLOSED 151.04
SESS 03/2
RO DIALOGUE REGIST: JOHL & 150.00
RAMIREZ
RO PARKING: CONGRESSIONAL CITY 105.00
CONF 3/8
RO CONF REGIST: RAMIREZ, E. 4/15-17-450.00
RO CONF REGIST: JOHL, R. 4/15-17
-450.00
1,024.49
REPLACEMENT BENEFIT FUND - COLA
4,765.59
4,765.59
FY19/20 GASB REPORTING SERVICES
2,250.00
2,250.00
VARI MAR WATER 3004755 41000 MAIN
23,192.89
23,192.89
ST
MAR WATER- 32131 S LOOP RD
48.90
48.90
Page:1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
04/30/2020 10:47:01AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
8655
4/22/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
MAR WATER 32131 S LOOP RD
DIST
8656
4/22/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
MAR WATER- 39656 DIEGO DR
DIST
8657
4/22/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
MAR WATER- 32131 S LOOP RD
DIST
8658
4/23/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
APR INTERNET SVCS- EXTERNAL DMV
LINE
8659
4/23/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
APR INTERNET SVCS- CHILDREN'S
MUSEUM
8660
4/24/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-30-099-3847 29721 RYECREST
8661
4/23/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 30600 PAUBA
RD
8662
4/9/2020
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
004905
LIEBERT, CASSIDYAND
IG WEBINAR: COVID-19: HR
WHITMORE
007282
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES
IG APPLE AIRPODS: GARIBAY, I.
INC
8663
4/30/2020
010349
CALIF DEPT OF CHILD
SUPPORT PAYMENT
SUPPORT
8664
4/30/2020
021301
I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN
ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN
106474
PAYMENT
8666
4/30/2020
000444
INSTATAX (EDD)
STATE TAXES PAYMENT
8667
4/30/2020
000283
INSTATAX (IRS)
FEDERAL TAXES PAYMENT
8670
4/30/2020
000389
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT
SOLUTION
PAYMENT
8671
4/30/2020
000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES'
PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT
RETIREMENT)
8672
4/30/2020
000444
INSTATAX (EDD)
2020 1ST QUARTER UI & ETT PAYMENT
Amount Paid Check Total
66.54
66.54
107.22
107.22
183.20
183.20
111.84
111.84
130.98
130.98
11.40
11.40
598.03
598.03
75.00
270.79
345.79
899.07
899.07
1,134.62
1,134.62
23,430.74
23,430.74
80,102.03
80,102.03
525.20
525.20
110,157.37
110,157.37
47,495.63
47,495.63
Paget
apChkLst
04/30/2020
10:47:01AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 3
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
8673
4/30/2020
002412
RICHARDS WATSON AND
FEB 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
82,156.37
GERSHON
CREDIT:BILLING ADJ/FEB 2020 LEGAL SF
-510.00
CREDIT. -BILLING ADJ/FEB 2020 LEGAL SF
-6,894.97
74,751.40
8674
4/27/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAR 2-30-296-9522 46679 PRIMROSE
29.50
29.50
AVE
8675
4/27/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-28-331-4847 32805 PAUBA RD
68.10
68.10
8676
4/28/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-40-576-0232 44173
13.95
13.95
BUTTERFIELD STG
8677
4/28/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-33-357-5785 44747 REDHAWK
21.85
21.85
PKWY
8678
4/28/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-41-072-5394 29429 TEM PKWY
55.33
55.33
8679
4/28/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-34-624-4452 32131 S LOOP RD
898.68
898.68
8680
4/28/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 055-475-6169-5 32380 DEER
64.93
64.93
HOLLOW WY
8681
4/28/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
MAR 015-575-0195-2 32211 WOLF VLY
194.15
194.15
RD
8682
4/27/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST
46.48
46.48
8683
4/27/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 42569
586.83
586.83
MARGARITA RD
8684
4/27/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 30875 RANCHO
586.83
586.83
VISTA RD
8685
4/28/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 32380 DEER
586.83
586.83
HOLLOW WAY
201278
4/30/2020
003951
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
1,756.87
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
341.88
2,098.75
201279
4/30/2020
007282
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: MALL
100.21
INC
STOREFRONT
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
30.44
BOOKS: LIBRARY
19.56
BOOKS: LIBRARY
-2.33
BOOKS: LIBRARY
-13.97
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FIRE PREVENTIOP
-22.77
111.14
Page3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
04/30/2020 10:47:01AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201280
4/30/2020
004422
AMERICAN BATTERY
BATTERIES: CIVIC CTR
CORPORATION, DBA
AMERICAN BATTERY SUP
201281
4/30/2020
004240
AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES
MAY STAND BY FEE: POLICE
AFN
201282
4/30/2020
002187
ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE
JAN & FEB ANIMAL CNTRL SVCS:
VALLEYS
TEMECULA
201283
4/30/2020
013950
AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO
APR DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT:
POLICE SW ST
201284
4/30/2020
021689
ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC
CEQAANALYSIS: ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY
201285
4/30/2020
021812
ASHBY, JUSTIN K.
REFUND: LD02-138GR, 03-327GR,
04-256GR,
201286
4/30/2020
003138
CAL MAT, DBA VULCAN
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
MATERIALS CO
201287
4/30/2020
000484
CALIF ASSN FOR LOCAL
MEMBERSHIP DUES: WALKER, C.
ECONOMIC, DEVELOPMENT
201288
4/30/2020
021349
CASA CENTER AGAINST
3/6 SART EXAM: TEM SHERIFF
SEXUAL, ASSAULT OF SW RIV
CO
4/15 SART EXAM: TEM SHERIFF
201289
4/30/2020
008534
CASTILLO, RYAN
EE CMPTR PURCHASE PRGM:
CASTILLO, R.
201290
4/30/2020
004462
CDW LLC, DBA CDW
MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO
GOVERNMENTLLC
TECH
201291
4/30/2020
004329
COSTCO TEMECULA 491
SUPPLIES:CONTRACT CLASSES
201292
4/30/2020
010650
CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING &
UPGRADE PATIO COVER: MPSC
HVAC INC
NEW DOORS: CIVIC CTR
SHOP UTILITY AREA UPGRADE: THEATE
PRESSURE WASHER: FACILITY MAINT: F
PLUMBING REPAIR: CRC
201293
4/30/2020
021789
DAVID ANTHONY CLARK,
TOWING SVCS: POLICE
CLARK'S TOWING &
RECOVERY
Amount Paid Check Total
65.45 65.45
1,300.00
1,300.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
56.57
56.57
33,012.36
33,012.36
3,980.00
3,980.00
529.05
529.05
100.00
100.00
550.00
550.00
1,100.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
85.65
85.65
68.34
68.34
20,400.00
13,900.00
9,150.00
1,695.00
233.00
45,378.00
2,250.00
2,250.00
Page:4
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
04/30/2020 10:47:01AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201294
4/30/2020
012600
DAVID EVANS AND
MAR DSGN SVCS: DIAZ RD PROJ
ASSOCIATES INC
PW17-25
MAR DSGN SVCS: DLR SIDEWALKS. PW
201295
4/30/2020
021801
DE BAAY, ANDREA
REFUND: ART & STREET PAINTING
FESTIVAL
201296
4/30/2020
003945
DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL
TEMPORARY FENCING: JRC
SRVCS
201297
4/30/2020
019720
DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES
APR WTR QUALITY MAINT:DUCK
INC
PN D/HARV.
201298
4/30/2020
004111
EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
2019 4TH QTR EMPLOYMENT: ECO
DEPT
DEV
201299
4/30/2020
009618
ENNIS FLINT INC
THERMO MATERIALS: TRAFFIC PW
201300
4/30/2020
015330
FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, OF
MAR CDBG SUB -RECIPIENT: FAIR
RIVERSIDE COUNTY INC
HOUSING SVC
201301
4/30/2020
010804
FEHR AND PEERS
MAR CEQA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
UPDATE -VMT
201302
4/30/2020
014865
FREIZE UHLER KIMBERLY DBA,
EMPLOYEE APPAREL: RECOGNITION
CLEAR BLUE PROMOTIONS
201303
4/30/2020
021804
FRENCH, SUMMER
REFUND: CINDERELLA SHOW
CANCELLED
201304
4/30/2020
014173
GOLDSTAR ASPHALT
MISC SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS
PRODUCTS, DBA NPG
CORPORATION
201305
4/30/2020
003792
GRAINGER
MISC SAFETY SUPPLIES: PARKS PW
201306
4/30/2020
012748
HARDY AND HARPER INC
SEAL/RESTRIPE: HELP CTR PARKING
LOT
201307
4/30/2020
010210
HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC
MISC TOOLS: CIVIC CTR PW
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
201308
4/30/2020
012285
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
201309 4/30/2020 019293 KITTRICH CORPORATION
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
K9 FOOD: TEMECULA POLICE
Amount Paid Check Total
30,400.50
5,783.50
200.00
95.00
6,969.00
312.00
1,206.82
1,637.14
13,868.50
564.49
45.00
668.05
238.08
5,000.00
530.63
238.89
922.54
664.32
14.19
100.50
36,184.00
200.00
95.00
6,969.00
312.00
1,206.82
1,637.14
13,868.50
564.49
45.00
668.05
238.08
5,000.00
769.52
1,601.05
100.50
Page:5
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6
04/30/2020 10:47:01AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201310
4/30/2020
001282
KNORR SYSTEMS INC
HEATER SVC: TEM ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
201311
4/30/2020
004905
LIEBERT, CASSIDY AND
MAR HR LEGAL SVCS FOR
W H ITMORE
TE060-00001
201312
4/30/2020
003726
LIFE ASSIST INC
EMERGENCY MED SUPPLIES - MEDIC
201313
4/30/2020
013982
M C I COMM SERVICE
APR XXX-0346 GENERAL USAGE
APR XXX-0714 GEN USAGE: PD MALL AL
201314
4/30/2020
020302
MARIS IMAGING SOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT IMAGING SVCS: CITY
LLC
CLERK
201315
4/30/2020
011956
MATTHEWS, AARON
EE CMPTR PURCHASE PRGM:
MATTHEWS, A.
201316
4/30/2020
004043
MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY
MISC LED LAMPS: PARKS: PW
INC
201317
4/30/2020
004586
MOORE FENCE COMPANY INC
UPGRADE GATE HRDWR: FOC
201318
4/30/2020
021803
MORALES, OLGA
REFUND: 2 TEMECULA PRESENTS
SHOWS
201319
4/30/2020
020946
MUSSON THEATRICAL INC
SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES:
THEATER
201320
4/30/2020
001323
NESTLE WATERS NORTH
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: CITY
AMERICA, DBA
CNCL
READYREFRESH
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: HELP CTR
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: TCC
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: THEATER
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: PBSP
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: AQUATICS
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: CRC
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: TVM
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: THEATER
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: MRC
3/23 - 4/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: SKATE PARI
201321
4/30/2020
021808
OTT, JAMES
REFUND: ROD RUN 5/1-5/2
201322
4/30/2020
010338
POOL & ELECTRICAL
VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATIC
PRODUCTS INC
FACILITIES
Amount Paid Check Total
1,358.45
1,358.45
2,166.00
2,166.00
1,125.56
1,125.56
33.68
31.73
65.41
9,115.39
9,115.39
1,398.57
1,398.57
86.56
86.56
6,915.80
6,915.80
173.20
173.20
175.35
175.35
43.71
28.74
28.69
17.38
17.22
16.30
11.95
8.69
8.69
8.69
8.61
198.67
35.00
35.00
115.14 115.14
Page.-6
apChkLst
04/30/2020
10:47:01AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 7
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201323
4/30/2020
012366
PROJECTTOUCH
HOMELESS PREVENTION PRGM:
1,060.00
1,060.00
SEARS
201324
4/30/2020
012366
PROJECT TOUCH
HOMELESS PREVENTION PRGM:
805.00
805.00
CALDWELL
201325
4/30/2020
012366
PROJECT TOUCH
HOMELESS PREVENTION PRGM:
805.00
805.00
ADU-BERKOH
201326
4/30/2020
008605
PSOMAS
2/28-3/26 CONSULT
810.00
810.00
SVC:PECH.PKWY,11-01
201327
4/30/2020
021602
PUBLIC RESTROOM COMPANY,
DSGN, FABRICATION, INSTALL: RRSP
54,579.00
54,579.00
THE
RSTRM,1
201328
4/30/2020
014494
R & R CONTROLS, INC
WEB AND HVAC SYS UPGRADES:VAR
6,255.68
6,255.68
FACILITIES
201329
4/30/2020
004029
R J M DESIGN GROUP INC
MAR MASTER PLAN:COMMUNITY
6,895.65
6,895.65
SERVICES
201330
4/30/2020
000907
RANCHO TEMECULA CAR
MAR VEHICLE DETAILING SRVC:TEM
21.99
21.99
WASH
SHERIFF
201331
4/30/2020
000406
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS
1/30-2/26 LAW ENFORCEMENT
2,307,674.89
2,307,674.89
DEPT
201332
4/30/2020
001365
RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF,
RENEW PERMIT:CIVIC CENTER
842.00
842.00
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DEPT
201333
4/30/2020
001097
ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC
PW TRAFFIC MAINT SUPPLIES
1,054.48
1,054.48
201334
4/30/2020
004274
SAFE AND SECURE
LOCKSMITH SERVICES:VAR PARKS
67.59
67.59
LOCKSMITH SRVC
201335
4/30/2020
000278
SAN DIEGO UNION -TRIBUNE
MAR LEGAL PUBLICATIONS: CITY
1,111.01
1,111.01
CLERK/PLNG
201336
4/30/2020
000278
SAN DIEGO UNION -TRIBUNE
5/6/20-5/4/21 SUBSCR:FIN 47545664
485.87
485.87
201337
4/30/2020
013695
SHRED -IT US JV LLC, DBA:
MAR DOC SHRED SRVCS: CITY FACS
386.32
SHRED -IT USA LLC
3/16, 4/13 DOC SHRED SRVCS:TEM SHEI
40.22
426.54
201338
4/30/2020
013482
SILVERMAN ENTERPRISES
APR 13-26 FACILITY SECURITY:PUMP
2,086.00
2,086.00
INC, DBA BAS SECURITY
TRACK
Page:?
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
04/30/2020 10:47:01AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201339
4/30/2020
020389
SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY,
IRRIGATION MATERIALS: RANCHO
LLC
HIGHLANDS
201340
4/30/2020
000519
SOUTH COUNTY PEST
EMERG PEST CNTRL SRVCS:TEE
CONTROL INC
DRIVE 4/14
PEST CONTROL SRVCS: OTA FIRE
201341
4/30/2020
017814
STC TRAFFIC INC
MAR STREET LGHT PLN REVIEW &
INSPECT SRV
201342
4/30/2020
002366
STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET
CARPET CLEANING SRVCS:FOC
CLEANING
CARPET CLEANING SRVCS:C. MUSEUM
CARPET CLEANING SRVCS:TVE2
201343
4/30/2020
003840
STRONGS PAINTING
PAINTING SVC: THEATER
201344
4/30/2020
021802
SUNDSTROM, JENNIFER
REFUND: STREET & ART PAINTING
FESTIVAL
201345
4/30/2020
013387
SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC
APR SWEEPING SRVCS:PARKING
STRUCTURE
201346
4/30/2020
004209
TEMECULA SUNRISE ROTARY,
APR-JUN BUS BENCH PLACEMENT&
FOUNDATION
MAINT:PW
201347
4/30/2020
003941
TEMECULA WINNELSON
PLUMBING SUPPLIES:VARIOUS PARKS
COMPANY
PLUMBING SUPPLIES:CIVIC CENTER
PLUMBING SUPPLIES:CIVIC CENTER
201348
4/30/2020
016670
TOTAL IMAGING SOLUTIONS,
4/16/20-4/15/21 SUPPORT
LLC
RENEWAL:LIBRARY
201349
4/30/2020
013474
TOWN & COUNTRY TOWING
TOWING SVCS: TEM SHERIFF
201350
4/30/2020
020275
WALLACE & ASSOC
FEB CONSTR MGMT
CONSULTING INC
SVC:PECH.PKWY,15-14
201351
4/30/2020
001881
WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES: AQUATICS PRGM
INC
201352
4/30/2020
001342
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC
SUPPLIES:CRC
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES:VAR FACILITIES
201353
4/30/2020
020670
WEBB MUNICIPAL FINANCE
SPECIAL TAX ADMINISTRATION FY
LLC
19/20
201354
4/30/2020
008668
WES FLOWERS
SUNSHINE FUND
SUNSHINE FUND
Amount Paid Check Total
601.39 601.39
94.00
48.00 142.00
1,497.50 1,497.50
1,250.00
425.00
400.00 2,075.00
1,000.00 1,000.00
100.00 100.00
540.00 540.00
2,233.75 2,233.75
561.80
512.87
481.43 1,556.10
835.00 835.00
325.00 325.00
6,777.00 6,777.00
418.66 418.66
391.66
156.67 548.33
20,668.99 20,668.99
61.43
61.43 122.86
PageB
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9
04/30/2020 10:47:01AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date Vendor
Description
201355
4/30/2020 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC
3/16-31 TREE MAINT:WOLF CREEK
3/16-31 TREE MAINT:CITYWIDE R-O-W
3/16-31 TREE MAINT:PARKS & MEDIANS
3/16-31 TREE MAINT:VAIL RANCH
201356
4/30/2020 000339 WEST PUBLISHING
MAR CLEAR SUBSCRIPTION:TEM
CORPORATION,
SHERIFF
DBA:THOMSON REUTERS
201357 4/30/2020 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO
REG, CONSERVATION
AUTHORITY
Amount Paid Check Total
13,362.75
11,469.35
661.50
94.50
893.00
25,588.10
893.00
MAR'20 MSHCP PAYMENT 54,912.00
FEB'20 MSHCP PAYMENT 48,580.00 103,492.00
Grand total for UNION BANK: 3,133,477.32
Page9
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10
04/30/2020 10:47:01AM CITY OF TEMECULA
114 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 3,133,477.32
Page:10
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
05/07/2020 11:29:23AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
8686
4/24/2020
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER
DISTRICT
8687
5/7/2020
002412
RICHARDS WATSON AND
GERSHON
8688
4/29/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
8689
4/29/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
8690
4/29/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
8691
4/29/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
8692
4/30/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
8693
4/30/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
8694
4/30/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
8695
5/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8696
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8697
5/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8698
5/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8699
5/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8700
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8701
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8702
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
VARI MAR WATER 3003545 N GENERAL
6,596.58
6,596.58
KEARNY
FEB 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
6,894.97
6,894.97
APR INTERNET SVCS- 41845 6TH ST
586.83
586.83
APR INTERNET SVCS- 28922 PUJOL ST
586.83
586.83
APR INTERNET SVCS- SKATE PARK
194.92
194.92
AND MPSC
APR INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
295.98
295.98
APR INTERNET SVCS- MPSC
150.98
150.98
APR INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
2,695.79
2,695.79
APR INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
5,347.08
5,347.08
APR 2-35-164-3770 43487
13.22
13.22
BUTTERFIELD STG
APR 2-28-904-7706 32329 OVERLAND
136.03
136.03
TRL
APR 2-35-164-3242 44270 MEADOWS
11.68
11.68
PKWY
APR 2-35-164-3515 32932 LEENA WAY
11.90
11.90
APR 2-35-164-3663 42335 MEADOWS
11.90
11.90
PKWY
APR 2-21-981-4720 30153 TEM PKWY
15.72
15.72
APR 2-41-072-5246 29429 TEM PKWY
32.00
32.00
APR 2-31-419-2873 43000 HWY 395
10.88
10.88
Page:1
apChkLst
05/07/2020
11:29:23AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 2
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
8703
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-31-912-7494 28690 MERCEDES
1,178.77
1,178.77
ST
8704
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-19-171-8568 28300 MERCEDES
145.82
145.82
ST
8705
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-18-937-3152 28314 MERCEDES
357.15
357.15
ST
8706
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-29-657-2787 41638
11.03
11.03
WINCHESTER RD
8707
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-34-333-3589 41702 MAIN ST
11.13
11.13
8708
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-29-224-0173 32364 OVERLAND
1,596.95
1,596.95
TRL
8709
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-29-807-1093 28079 DIAZ RD
11.24
11.24
8710
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-29-807-1226 28077 DIAZ RD
11.24
11.24
8711
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-14-204-1615 30027 FRONT ST
19.64
19.64
8712
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-31-536-3481 41902 MAIN ST
123.70
123.70
8713
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-31-536-3655 41904 MAIN ST
1,255.03
1,255.03
8714
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-02-502-8077 43210 BUS PARK
185.20
185.20
DR
8715
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-00-397-5042 43200 BUS PARK
2,621.09
2,621.09
DR
8716
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-02-351-4946 41845 6TH ST
470.09
470.09
8717
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-32-903-8293 41000 MAIN ST
13,319.75
13,319.75
8718
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-41-502-0478 28402 MERCEDES
23.36
23.36
ST
8719
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-31-282-0665 27407 DIAZ RD
11.76
11.76
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
O5/07/2020 11:29:23AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
8720
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-31-031-2616 27991 DIAZ RD
8721
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-29-933-3831 43230 BUS PARK
DR
8722
5/4/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-35-421-1260 41955 4TH ST
8723
5/5/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-31-536-3226 28690 MERCEDES
ST
8724
4/9/2020
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
021817
DDS DENTAL SUPPLIES
ZH COVID DISINFECTANT WIPES: PD
8725
5/5/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
APR INTERNET SVCS- LIBRARY
8726
5/5/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
APR INTERNET SVCS- FIRE STATION
73
8727
5/4/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 40820
WINCHESTER RD
8728
5/4/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 32364
OVERLAND TRL
8729
5/5/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
APR INTERNET SVCS- 28300
MERCEDES ST
8730
5/5/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
MAR WATER MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS
DIST
8731
5/5/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
MAR WATER MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS
DIST
8732
5/5/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
MAR WATER 39569 SERAPHINA RD
DIST
8733
5/5/2020
001986
MUZAK LLC
MAY DISH NETWORK: 41952 6TH ST
8734
5/5/2020
001986
MUZAK LLC
MAY DISH NETWORK: 32131
BUTTERFIELD STG
8735
5/5/2020
001986
MUZAK LLC
MAY DISH NETWORK: 43230 BUS PARK
DR
Amount Paid Check Total
11.76
11.76
2,092.13
2,092.13
10.89
10.89
1,493.20
1,493.20
201.82
201.82
190.98
190.98
121.84
121.84
586.83
586.83
58.99
58.99
586.83
586.83
25.74
25.74
25.74
25.74
154.80
154.80
56.10
56.10
155.08
155.08
166.27
166.27
Page:3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
O5/07/2020 11:29:23AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
8736
5/5/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
APR 095-167-7907-2 30650 PAUBA RD
8737
5/5/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
APR 125-244-2108-3 30600 PAUBA RD
201358
5/1/2020
000418
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
NOE:ACCESS.DWELLING UNIT
RECORDER
ORD.LR19-1596
201359
5/1/2020
000418
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
NOE:DENSITY BONUS ORD. AMEND.
RECORDER
LR19-1597
201360
5/7/2020
003951
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
201361
5/7/2020
004422
AMERICAN BATTERY
BATTERIES: CIVIC CTR
CORPORATION, DBA
AMERICAN BATTERY SUP
201362
5/7/2020
000747
AMERICAN PLANNING
6 MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS:
ASSOCIATION
PLANNERS
201363
5/7/2020
000101
APPLE ONE INC
APR TEMP STAFF SVCS: HR
201364
5/7/2020
017797
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO.,
EWC FINALAUDIT: INSURANCE
INSURANCE BROKERS OF CA
201365
5/7/2020
021400
AYERS ELECTRIC INC
ELECTRICAL WORK/UPGRADES: CIVIC
CTR
201366
5/7/2020
014293
BIBLIOTHECA LLC
MOBILE INVENTORY WAND: LIBRARY
201367
5/7/2020
014284
BLAKELYS TRUCK SERVICE,
VEHICLE/EQUIP REPAIRS:PW STREET
AKA DONALD W BLAKELY
MAINT
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: PW STREET MAP
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: PW STREET MAP
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: PW STREET MAP
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: PW STREET MAP
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: PW STREET MAP
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: PW STREET MAIP
201368
5/7/2020
021588
BRAUN PETER, DBA
MAY PLANTSCAPE SVCS: CIVIC CTR
TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE
MAY PLANTSCAPE SVCS: LIBRARY
201369
5/7/2020
003138
CAL MAT, DBA VULCAN
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
MATERIALS CO
201370
5/7/2020
000638
CALIF DEPT OF
2020 1 ST QTR PMT:STRONG MOTION
CONSERVATION
(JAN-MAR)
Amount Paid Check Total
210.68
210.68
219.27
219.27
50.00
50.00
50.00
50.00
383.50
383.50
65.45
65.45
2,735.00 2,735.00
123.66
123.66
4,686.00
4,686.00
6,500.00
6,500.00
4,418.38
4,418.38
440.98
108.00
66.15
54.00
90.00
171.00
108.00
1,038.13
500.00
200.00
700.00
174.71
174.71
5,326.72
5,326.72
Page:4
apChkLst
05/07/2020 11:29:2 3A M
Bank: union UNION BANK
Check # Date Vendor
201371 5/7/2020 000647 CALIF DEPT OF CONSUMER
AFFAIRS
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
(Continued)
Description
LICENSE RENEWAL: MORENO. R.
201372 5/7/2020 021349
CASA CENTER AGAINST
SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF
SEXUAL, ASSAULT OF SW RIV
CO
SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF
SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF
201373 5/7/2020 018828
CASC ENGINEERING AND,
CONSULTANT SVCS: YNEZ RD:
CONSULTING INC
PW17-17
MAR MISC ENG SVCS: WQMP/PLAN CK ;
201374 5/7/2020 004462
CDW LLC, DBA CDW
MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO
GOVERNMENT LLC
TECH
MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO TECF
201375 5/7/2020 009640
CERTIFION CORP DBA
APR ONLINE DATABASE SUBSCR:
ENTERSECT
POLICE
201376 5/7/2020 016446
CHRISTIAN STITCHERY INC,
BIKE DECALS: HIKE BIKE CITY
DBA SO CAL IMPRESSIONS
PRGM:PLNG
201377 5/7/2020 020455
CHS EDUCATION
REFUND: CRC RENTAL 5/18/20
FOUNDATION, BASEBALL
CANCELLED
201378 5/7/2020 000442
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
ALARM SVC CALL: CIVIC CTR
ALARM REPAIRS: CHILDRENS MUSEUM
APR-JUN ALARM SYS MONITORINS: VAF
JAN-MAR ALARM SYS MONITORING: VAF
201379 5/7/2020 010650
CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING &
COUNTERTOPS/CABINETS: VAR
HVAC INC
LOCATIONS
201380 5/7/2020 001233
DANS FEED AND SEED INC
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
201381 5/7/2020 001393
DATA TICKET INC, DBA
MAR CITATION PROCESSING:CSD
REVENUE EXPERTS
MAR PARKING CITATION PROCESSING:
201382 5/7/2020 012600
DAVID EVANS AND
MAR DSGN SVCS: RRSP EXPANSION
ASSOCIATES INC
18-03
201383 5/7/2020 002990
DAVID TURCH AND
APR FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY
ASSOCIATES
MGR
MAR FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY M
FEB FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY M,
JAN FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY Mf
201384 5/7/2020 003945
DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL
PORTABLE TOILET SVCS: CORONA
SRVCS
VIRUS: PD
Amount Paid
115.00
800.00
300.00
800.00
1,236.00
6,852.00
131.78
58.07
205.98
462.19
320.00
80.00
1,273.00
6,240.00
6,240.00
17.950.00
22.98
58.32
200.00
1,461.51
14,127.88
5,500.00
5,500.00
5,500.00
5,500.00
124.97
Page: 5
Check Total
115.00
1,900.00
8,088.00
189.85
205.98
462.19
320.00
13,833.00
17,950.00
81.30
1,661.51
14,127.88
22,000.00
124.97
Pages
apChki-st
O5/07/2020
11:29:23AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 6
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201385
5/7/2020
004192
DOWNS ENERGY FUEL
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG
158.95
INSPECTORS
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PW CIP
124.37
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI
961.99
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC DIV
240.10
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD
213.29
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT
91.11
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT
740.66
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV
71.02
2,601.49
201386
5/7/2020
020904
ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVES INC
MAY CONDENSER H2O SYST MAINT:
525.00
525.00
CIVIC CTR
201387
5/7/2020
013367
ELECTRO INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
MISC SMALL TOOLS EQUIP: PW
657.47
657.47
TRAFFIC
201388
5/7/2020
002577
ENGINEERING RESOURCES
MAR ENG SVCS: SIDEWALK: 5TH ST:
2,648.50
2,648.50
PW20-02
201389
5/7/2020
001056
EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC
LDSCPNG: RANCHO CAL RD MEDIANS
4,642.00
LNDSCP REPAIR: MARGARITA RD MEDIF
8,010.00
12,652.00
201390
5/7/2020
019469
FALCON ENGINEERING
APR CONST MGMT SVCS:ULT.
11,711.26
11,711.26
SERVICES
INTRCHG,PW04-08
201391
5/7/2020
009953
FEDERAL CLEANING
MAY JANITORIAL SRVCS: POLICE
1,167.06
1,167.06
CONTRACTORS, DBA FEDERAL
MALL OFC
BLDG SERVICES
201392
5/7/2020
000165
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
4/15 EXP MAIL SVCS: POLICE
60.13
60.13
201393
5/7/2020
016436
FRICK, TRACY
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: CARBONITE
83.99
83.99
201394
5/7/2020
021527
GIANT DESIGN
ART WORK/MERCHANDISE:TEM ROD
9,192.00
9,192.00
RUN
201395
5/7/2020
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFC SUPPLIES - BLDG & SAFETY
228.32
INC
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
76.02
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 84
45.03
349.37
Page6
apChkLst
O5/07/2020
11:29:23AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 7
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201396
5/7/2020
000186
HANKS HARDWARE INC
MAINT SUPPLIES: LIBRARY
12.00
MAINT SUPPLIES: THEATER
99.87
HDWRE SUPPLIES: VARI FIRE STATIONS
-98.70
MAINT SUPPLIES: CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
125.81
MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: PW - TRAP
349.34
MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
1,175.61
MAINT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT
1,165.31
HDWRE SUPPLIES: VARI FIRE STATIONS
243.12
MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC
375.47
MISC SUPPLIES: HARVESTON LAKE PAF
165.56
MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI PARKS
1,447.62
MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM
161.16
MAINT SUPPLIES: TCC
53.07
MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC
65.91
5,341.15
201397
5/7/2020
020628
HASA INC
VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATIC
756.44
756.44
FACILITIES
201398
5/7/2020
002109
HD SUPPLY CONSTR. SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
699.22
699.22
LTD, DBA HDS WHITE CAP
CONST
201399
5/7/2020
000520
HDL COREN AND CONE
APR-JUN PROP TAX CONSULTING:
5,625.00
5,625.00
FINANCE
201400
5/7/2020
010210
HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
86.28
PAINT SUPPLIES:CRC
188.14
274.42
201401
5/7/2020
005579
INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY,
WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE
885.00
885.00
SERVICES, INC
ENFORCEMENT
201402
5/7/2020
015923
INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC
COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES:
1,488.62
1,488.62
CLEMENTS, B.
201403
5/7/2020
021815
IRASUSTA, JENNIFER
REFUND: TCC RENTAL 6/6 CANCELLED
606.00
606.00
201404
5/7/2020
012285
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
141.38
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
985.77
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
123.45
1,250.60
201405
5/7/2020
003726
LIFE ASSIST INC
EMERGENCY MED SUPPLIES - MEDIC
182.70
182.70
201406
5/7/2020
002634
LITELINES INC
LIGHT POLE PARTS: OLD TOWN
1,003.75
1,003.75
STREET
Page:?
apChkLst
O5/07/2020
11:29:23AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 8
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201407
5/7/2020
003782
MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET
425.61
ATHACO INC
MAINT
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP
1,938.42
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP
5,623.31
7,987.34
201408
5/7/2020
000944
MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC
TRAFFIC SFTWR MAINT RENEWAL:
11,150.00
11,150.00
PW
201409
5/7/2020
010918
MENZIMER, KRISTAL
REIMB:CPRS CONF: 3/11-3/13
98.21
98.21
201410
5/7/2020
019823
MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC
MAR JANITORIAL SVCS:VAR CITY
14,688.84
14,688.84
FACS
201411
5/7/2020
018314
MICHAEL BAKER
2/15-3/29 PROF SVCS: YNEZ RD,
19,908.64
19,908.64
INTERNATIONAL
PW17-17
201412
5/7/2020
021816
MILIOTO, MONIR
REFUND: PARENT & ME SWIM
45.00
45.00
LESSONS
201413
5/7/2020
004043
MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
151.19
INC
ELECTRIC SUPPLY: THEATER
77.11
228.30
201414
5/7/2020
010990
MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN
JUN-FEB ON CALL CONSULT SVCS:
11,150.00
INC, DBA M I G
PLANNING
APR -MAY ON CALL CONSULT SVCS: PLA
1,118.55
MAR ON CALL CONSULTING SVCS: PLAP
1,136.25
13,404.80
201415
5/7/2020
004040
MORAMARCO ANTHONY J,
GRAPHIC DESIGN:TCSD ADMIN
2,250.00
2,250.00
DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS
201416
5/7/2020
009337
NV5 INC
MAR PROJ MGT SVCS:MRC, PW17-21
10,890.00
10,890.00
201417
5/7/2020
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE
CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW LAND
3,503.58
3,503.58
DEV
201418
5/7/2020
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE
CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:POLICE
571.53
571.53
201419
5/7/2020
019851
ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC
PRGS PMT #32:ULT. INTRCHG,
20,292.85
20,292.85
PW04-08
201420
5/7/2020
000249
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
960.98
960.98
201421
5/7/2020
012366
PROJECT TOUCH
HOMELESS PREV PRGM: JOHNSON
1,140.00
1,140.00
201422
5/7/2020
012366
PROJECT TOUCH
HOMELESS PREV PRGM: STRONG
960.00
960.00
Page:8
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9
05/07/2020 11:29:23AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
201423
5/7/2020
005075
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL
SUPPLY
201424
5/7/2020
020127
QUINN COMPANY
201425
5/7/2020
001592
RIVERSIDE CO INFO
TECHNOLOGY
201426
5/7/2020
000406
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS
DEPT
201427
5/7/2020
001365
RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF,
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DEPT
(Continued)
Description
APR UNIFORM/FLR MATS/TWL
RNTL:PARKS/CV C
APR UNIFORM/FLR MATS/TOWEL RENT:(
EQUIP RENTAL:PW STREET MAINT
MAR EMERG RADIO RENTAL: TEM
SHERIFF
2/27-3/25 LAW ENFORCEMENT
QOL TRAFFIC DUI SATURATION 3/6
JAN-MAR '20 VECTOR CONTROL
SRVCS
201428
5/7/2020
005585
ROMINE, MARIA
REIMB:CODE ENF UNIFORMS
201429
5/7/2020
004274
SAFE AND SECURE
LOCKSMITH SRVCS: POLICE
LOCKSMITH SRVC
SUBSTATION
201430
5/7/2020
014783
SOFTRESOURCES, LLC
DEMO PREP/FACILITATION:MUNIS FIN
SYS
201431
5/7/2020
002503
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY,
FY19/20ANN'L OPS FEES:CRC
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
FY19/20 EMISSIONS FEE:CRC
201432
5/7/2020
002503
SOUTH COASTAIR QUALITY,
FY19/20AQMD FEE:CRC
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
FY19/20 AQMD FEE:STN 84
201433
5/7/2020
000519
SOUTH COUNTY PEST
APR PEST CONTROL SRVCS: WOLF
CONTROL INC
CRK PRK
201434
5/7/2020
000161
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
MAR IMPLEMENT/TRNG SVC:TYLER
EXECUTIME
201435
5/7/2020
002702
U S POSTAL SERVICE
MAR'20 POSTAGE METER DEPOSIT
201436
5/7/2020
007766
UNDERGROUND SERVICE
APR UNDRGRND UTILITY LOCATOR
ALERT, OF SOUTHERN
ALERTS:PW T
CALIFORNIA
APR UNDRGRND UTILITY LOCATOR ALE
201437
5/7/2020
012549
UPODIUM, AKA JOHN
VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES:STA95
FONTEYN
VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES:STA95
VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES:STA95
Amount Paid Check Total
628.00
666.66
952.82
2,359.72
2,483,383.65
1,747.92
1,592.87
144.80
46.22
5,180.00
421.02
136.40
137.63
137.63
49.00
437.50
2,238.20
105.60
173.35
66.87
142.72
28.87
1,294.66
952.82
2,359.72
2,485,131.57
1,592.87
144.80
46.22
5,180.00
557.42
275.26
49.00
437.50
2,238.20
278.95
238.46
Page9
apChkLst
O5/07/2020
11:29:23AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 10
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201438
5/7/2020 009101
VISION ONE INC, DBA
APR SHOWARE TICKETING
0.80
0.80
ACCESSO SHOWARE
SRVCS:THEATER
201439
5/7/2020 001342
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES:EOC/COVID-19
490.58
SURGICAL MASKS: EOC
497.80
988.38
201440
5/7/2020 003730
WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC
4/1-15 TREE MAINT:VAIL RANCH
6,331.50
4/1-15 TREE MAINT:WOLF CREEK
9,072.00
4/1-15 TREE MAINT:PARKS & MEDIANS
189.00
15,592.50
Grand total for UNION BANK:
2,843,826.79
Page:10
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11
O5/07/2020 11:29:23AM CITY OF TEMECULA
135 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 2,843,826.79
Page:11
Item No. 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2020
PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report
as of March 31, 2020.
BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the
City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively.
Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the
next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund
(LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust
statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information.
The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and
Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of March 31, 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2020
f..
City of Temecula
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report 41000 Main Street
Portfolio Management Temecula, CA 92590
PAY g (951)694-6430
Portfolio Summary
March 31, 2020
Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM
Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
Managed Pool Accounts 47,138,737.44 47,138,737.44 47,138,737.44 33.14 1 1 0.884 0.896
Retention Escrow Account 873,104.34 873,104.34 873,104.34 0.61 1 1 0.056 0.057
Letter of Credit 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000
Trust Accounts 10,863,056.33 10,863,056.33 10,863,056.33 7.64 1 1 6.372 6.460
Local Agency Investment Funds 63,370,244.44 63,844,318.19 63,370,244.44 44.55 1 1 1.763 1.787
Federal Agency Callable Securities 13,000,000.00 13,115,900.00 13,000,000.00 9.14 1,343 482 1.729 1.753
Federal Agency Bullet Securities 7,000,000.00 7,174,050.00 7,000,000.00 4.92 1,122 730 2.001 2.029
142,245,144.55 143,009,168.30 142,245,144.55 100.00% 179 81 1.822 1.847
Investments
Cash
Passbook/Checking 3,578,437.36 3,578,437.36 3,578,437.36 1 1 0.000 0.000
(not included in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments 145,823,581.91 146,587,605.66 145,823,581.91 179 81 1.822 1.847
Total Earnings March 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 268,081.89 810,251.69
Average Daily Balance 148,139,143.45 140,228,621.30
Effective Rate of Return 2.13% 0.77%
Reporting period 03/01/2020-03/31/2020 Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET_MTH: 05/06/2020 11:05 NL! CP
Run Date: 05/06/2020 - 11:05 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
March 31, 2020
Page 1
Average
Purchase
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to Maturity
CUSIP
Investment #
Issuer Balance
Date
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
Rate
360
365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
233358001-6
01-2 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
11,351.37
11,351.37
11,351.37
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
233358006-6
01-2 REF RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
508,108.27
508,108.27
508,108.27
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
233358000-6
01-2 REF ST
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
359,418.97
359,418.97
359,418.97
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
276213009-6
03-02 COI
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
276213008-6
03-02 IMPR
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
581.49
581.49
581.49
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
276213006-6
03-02 RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
749,039.36
749,039.36
749,039.36
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
164741002-6
03-03 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
164741008-6
03-03IMP
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
227,837.03
227,837.03
227,837.03
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
164741006-6
03-03RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
408.62
408.62
408.62
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
164741000-6
03-03SPEC
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
719,833.20
719,833.20
719,833.20
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
164742002-6
03-06 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.630
1.608
1.630
1
164742000-6
03-06SPEC
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
103,572.96
103,572.96
103,572.96
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
229462007-6
03-1 2012 RF
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
3.80
3.80
3.80
0.260
0.256
0.260
1
229462002--6
03-1 BOND FD
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
2,190.84
2,190.84
2,190.84
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
229462009-6
03-1 COI
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
229462006-6
03-1 RESERV
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
17,582.44
17,582.44
17,582.44
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
229462000-6
03-1 SPECF
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
348,164.76
348,164.76
348,164.76
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
94669921-6
03-1ACQ11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.870
0.858
0.870
1
94669911-6
03-1ACQA11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669917-6
03-1 RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669916-6
03-1 RESB11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669000-6
03-1 SPTAX11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
276213002-6
03-2 REFU
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
17,091.17
17,091.17
17,091.17
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
276213000-6
03-2 SPEC
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
246,771.79
246,771.79
246,771.79
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
94686001-6
03-4ADMIN11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
533.28
533.28
533.28
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
94686005-6
034PREP11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
13.65
13.65
13.65
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
94686000-6
034RED11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
150,048.08
150,048.08
150,048.08
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
94686006-6
034RES11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
21,735.09
21,735.09
21,735.09
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
276213022-6
16-01 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
69,256.09
69,256.09
69,256.09
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
276213023-6
16-01 CAPINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.870
0.858
0.870
1
276213029-6
16-01 COI
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
276213028-6
16-01 IMP
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
6,714,128.27
6,714,128.27
6,714,128.27
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
276213026-6
16-01 RESERV
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
3,184,076.80
3,184,076.80
3,184,076.80
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
276213020-6
16-01 SPECF
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
1,460,010.89
1,460,010.89
1,460,010.89
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
218848001-6
2017A&BINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
1,406.75
1,406.75
1,406.75
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
218848008-6
2017ABPRIORP
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
17,932.80
17,932.80
17,932.80
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
218848013-2
2017B COI
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848000-6
2017B IDS
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
1,600,434.46
1,600,434.46
1,600,434.46
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 05/06/2020 11:05
Run Date: 05/06/2020 - 11:05
Portfolio TEME
NLI CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
March 31, 2020
Page 2
Average
Purchase
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to Maturity
CUSIP
Investment #
Issuer Balance
Date
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
Rate
360
365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
218848002-6
2017B PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
981.00
981.00
981.00
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
218848009-6
2017B_PROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
13,103,986.99
13,103,986.99
13,103,986.99
0.370
0.365
0.370
1
233358009-6
233358009-6
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94434160-6
RDA-021NT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94434161-6
RDA-02PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886000-6
RDA-06AINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886001-6
RDA06APRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886010-6
RDA06BINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886011-6
RDA06BPRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.680
0.671
0.680
1
107886016-6
RDA06BRES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.940
0.927
0.940
1
107886020-6
RDA071NT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886021-6
RDA07PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.930
0.917
0.930
1
107886028-6
RDA07PROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.940
0.927
0.940
1
107886026-6
RDA07RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.940
0.927
0.940
1
136343008-6
RDA10APROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
136343018-6
RDA10BPROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
136343000-6
RDA10INT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
136343001-6
RDA10PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
136343006-6
RDA10RSRV
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
146161000-6
RDA11AINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
146161001-6
RDA11APRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669902-3
03-1 BOND3
First American Treasury
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94434160-1
RDA 02 INT1
First American Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.010
0.010
0.010
1
94434161-2
RDA 02 PRIN2
First American Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.010
0.010
0.010
1
136343018-2
RDA 10B CIP2
First American Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.010
0.010
0.010
1
146161008-3
RDA11APROJ
Federated Institutional Tax Fr
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.800
0.789
0.800
1
146161006-3
RDA11ARSRV
Federated Institutional Tax Fr
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669921-5
03-01 ACQ11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669911-5
03-01 ACQA11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669917-5
03-01 RES
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669906-5
03-01 RESA11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.001
0.001
0.001
1
94669916-5
03-01 RESB11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669000-5
03-01SPTAX11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
164742006-5
03-06 RES
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
164742000-5
03-06 SPEC
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669902-5
03-1 bond fd
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94686001-5
03-4 ADMIN11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94686005-5
03-4 PREP11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 05/06/2020 11:05
Run Date: 05/06/2020 - 11:05
Portfolio TEME
NLI CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
March 31, 2020
Page 3
Average Purchase
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to Maturity
CUSIP
Investment #
Issuer Balance Date
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
Rate
360
365
Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
94686006-5
034 RES11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669917-1
03-01-1 RES
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
276213008-1
03-02 IMP
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
14,851,428.67
14,851,428.67
14,851,428.67
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
164742006-1
03-06 RES-1
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
327,724.40
327,724.40
327,724.40
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
229462007-1
03-1 2012 RE
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
803,968.84
803,968.84
803,968.84
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
94669911-1
03-1 ACQ A2
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
94669921-1
03-1 ACQ B2
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
744727011-1
03-3 ACQ 2
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
164741006-1
0303-1 RES
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
1,518,670.62
1,518,670.62
1,518,670.62
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
107886028-1
RDA 07 PRO-1
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
107886026-1
RDA 07 RES-1
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
136343018-1
RDA 10B CIP1
CA
Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
229462020-0
03-01 CASH
USBANK
444.69
444.69
444.69
0.000
0.000
1
233358050-1
01-2 SPECESC
U.S.
Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.360
0.355
0.360
1
Subtotal and Average 47,214,279.52
47,138,737.44
47,138,737.44
47,138,737.44
0.884
0.896
1
Retention Escrow Account
PACIFIC PREMIER
20190607-882
PACIFIC PREMIER
08/01/2019
89,200.38
89,200.38
89,200.38
0.000
0.000
1
218848050-0
2002 ESCROW
USBANK
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848060-0
2006AESCRO
USBANK
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848070-0
2006BESCRO
USBANK
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848080-0
2007ESCROW
USBANK
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
229462020-2
03-01 ESCROW
U.S. Treasury
783,903.96
783,903.96
783,903.96 0.063
0.062
0.063
1
Subtotal and Average
876,305.51
873,104.34
873,104.34
873,104.34
0.056
0.057
1
Letter of Credit
218848006-1
2017B RESER ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CDR 07/01/2019
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.000
0.000
1
233358006-1
01-2 REFRESI ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2019
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.000
0.000
1
Subtotal and Average 2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
0.000
0.000
1
Trust Accounts
6746058700
PARS Pension US Bank Trust
10,863,056.33
10,863,056.33
10,863,056.33
6.460
6.372
6.460
1
Subtotal and Average 12,024,056.95
10,863,056.33
10,863,056.33
10,863,056.33
6.372
6.460
1
Local Agency Investment Funds
SYSCITY
CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun
33,381,779.33
33,631,508.92
33,381,779.33
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
SYSRDA
RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun
1,864.24
1,878.19
1,864.24
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
SYSTCSD
TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun
29,986,600.87
30,210,931.08
29,986,600.87
1.787
1.763
1.787
1
Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 05/06/2020 11:05 NLI CP
Run Date: 05/06/2020 - 11:05
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
March 31, 2020
Page 4
Average
Purchase
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to Maturity
CUSIP
Investment # Issuer Balance
Date
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
Rate
360
365 Maturity Date
Subtotal and Average 64,996,050.89
63,370,244.44
63,844,318.19
63,370,244.44
1.763
1.787
1
Federal Agency Callable Securities
3133ELFX7
01252
Federal Farm Credit Bank
12/30/2019
1,000,000.00
1,009,570.00
1,000,000.00
1.650
1.627
1.650
638 12/30/2021
3130AANA2
01227
Federal Home Loan Bank
01/30/2017
1,000,000.00
1,004,950.00
1,000,000.00
1.750
1.726
1.750
120 07/30/2020
3130ABYY6
01235
Federal Home Loan Bank
08/24/2017
1,000,000.00
1,013,240.00
1,000,000.00
1.750
1.726
1.750
329 02/24/2021
3130ACN83
01238
Federal Home Loan Bank
10/30/2017
1,000,000.00
1,001,660.00
1,000,000.00
1.700
1.677
1.700
44 05/15/2020
3134G8PP8
01220
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
03/30/2016
1,000,000.00
1,004,040.00
1,000,000.00
1.500
1.661
1.684
182 09/30/2020
3134GBAB8
01229
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
03/27/2017
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.670
1.647
1.670
27 03/27/2020
3134GBGZ9
01232
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
04/27/2017
1,000,000.00
1,029,040.00
1,000,000.00
2.000
1.964
1.991
666 01/27/2022
3134GBNK4
01234
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
05/30/2017
1,000,000.00
1,001,970.00
1,000,000.00
1.625
1.603
1.625
58 05/29/2020
3134GBL42
01237
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
09/28/2017
1,000,000.00
1,004,870.00
1,000,000.00
1.670
1.647
1.670
180 09/28/2020
3134GSMF9
01246
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
05/30/2018
1,000,000.00
1,026,600.00
1,000,000.00
3.000
2.959
3.000
1,150 05/26/2023
3134GU6D7
01253
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
01/28/2020
1,000,000.00
1,007,610.00
1,000,000.00
1.650
1.627
1.650
1,213 07/28/2023
3136G3CL7
01218
Federal National Mtg Assn
03/24/2016
1,000,000.00
1,002,620.00
1,000,000.00
1.420
1.401
1.420
176 09/24/2020
3136G3TE5
01221
Federal National Mtg Assn
06/29/2016
1,000,000.00
1,002,390.00
1,000,000.00
1.250
1.233
1.250
89 06/29/2020
3136G4UL5
01255
Federal National Mtg Assn
02/26/2020
1,000,000.00
1,007,340.00
1,000,000.00
1.650
1.627
1.650
1,426 02/26/2024
Subtotal and Average 13,838,709.68
13,000,000.00
13,115,900.00
13,000,000.00
1.729
1.753
482
Federal Agency
Bullet Securities
3133EJT74
01249
Federal Farm Credit Bank
11/15/2018
1,000,000.00
1,041,960.00
1,000,000.00
3.050
3.008
3.050
593 11/15/2021
3133ELMA9
01254
Federal Farm Credit Bank
02/07/2020
1,000,000.00
1,027,440.00
1,000,000.00
1.420
1.401
1.420
1,223 08/07/2023
3133ELTU8
01256
Federal Farm Credit Bank
03/18/2020
1,000,000.00
1,011,800.00
1,000,000.00
0.920
0.907
0.920
1,447 03/18/2024
3130ADEB4
01240
Federal Home Loan Bank
01/12/2018
1,000,000.00
1,014,410.00
1,000,000.00
2.125
2.096
2.125
286 01/12/2021
3130ADR79
01243
Federal Home Loan Bank
03/20/2018
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.300
2.268
2.300
20 03/20/2020
3130ADSJ2
01244
Federal Home Loan Bank
03/08/2018
1,000,000.00
1,020,410.00
1,000,000.00
2.460
2.426
2.460
341 03/08/2021
3130AHF81
01251
Federal Home Loan Bank
10/25/2019
1,000,000.00
1,019,340.00
1,000,000.00
1.600
1.578
1.600
572 10/25/2021
3135GOU92
01250
Federal National Mtg Assn
01/11/2019
1,000,000.00
1,038,690.00
1,000,000.00
2.625
2.589
2.625
650 01/11/2022
Subtotal and Average 7,064,516.13
7,000,000.00
7,174,050.00
7,000,000.00
2.001
2.029
730
Total and Average 148,139,143.45
142,245,144.55
143,009,168.30
142,245,144.55
1.822
1.847
81
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 05/06/2020 11:05
Run Date: 05/06/2020 - 11:05
Portfolio TEME
NLI CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Cash
March 31, 2020
Page 5
Average
Purchase
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to
CUSIP
Investment #
Issuer Balance
Date
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value Rate
360
365 Maturity
Passbook/Checking
Accounts
1453718479
WORKERS
BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC
07/01/2019
14,652.48
14,652.48
14,652.48
0.000
0.000
1
SYSPetty Cash
Petty Cash
City of Temecula
07/01/2019
3,911.00
3,911.00
3,911.00
0.000
0.000
1
SYSGen Ck Acct
Gen Ck Acct
Union Bank of California
3,551,035.38
3,551,035.38
3,551,035.38
0.000
0.000
1
SYSParking Ck
PARKING CITA
Union Bank of California
07/01/2019
8,838.50
8,838.50
8,838.50
0.000
0.000
1
Average Balance 0.00
1
Total Cash and Investments
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 05/06/2020 11:05
Run Date: 05/06/2020 - 11:05
148,139,143.45
145,823,581.91 146,587,605.66 145,823,581.91 1.822 1.847 81
Portfolio TEME
NL! CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Cash and Investments Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
Throuah March 2020
Fund
# Fund Name
Beainnina Balance
Receipts
Disbursements
Fund Total
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 37.793.673.68
$ 8.894.263.16
$ 12.449.513.09
$ 34.238.423.75
002
MEASURE S FUND
10.811.747.06
2.036.867.72
4.451.450.75
8.397.164.03
100
STATE GAS TAX FUND
347.873.28
177.723.69
525.596.97
102
RMRA-ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACT
576.255.90
162.230.74
738.486.64
103
STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND
2.177.465.40
388.716.59
2.566.181.99
106
JEFFERSON STREET IN LIEU FEES
493.586.24
2.070.01
495.656.25
120
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
3.014.009.10
325.061.15
-
3.339.070.25
125
PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT
411.435.24
2.064.25
51.198.84
362.300.65
145
TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM
195.943.23
1.147.29
-
197.090.52
150
AB 2766 FUND
204.024.67
35.470.31
239.494.98
160
SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
16.951.95
183.44
17.135.39
161
TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND
26.787.02
156.85
-
26.943.87
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
601.217.97
1.325.479.83
35.057.40
1.891.640.40
170
MEASURE A FUND
5.966.777.83
674.446.39
37.323.00
6.603.901.22
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
377.365.80
2.107.782.24
1.228.675.59
1.256.472.45
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS
-
43.241.76
43.218.05
23.71
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING
433.561.90
7.520.76
4.548.11
436.534.55
195
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT
20.721.34
116.82
-
20.838.16
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
413.757.79
3.055.34
15.054.23
401.758.90
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
288.124.46
237.071.23
117.393.05
407.802.64
198
PUBLIC ART
48.954.81
2.713.01
-
51.667.82
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND
16.270.980.54
199.920.38
2.873.580.78
13.597.320.14
275
CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND
227.573.43
263.60
227.837.03
277
CFD-RORIPAUGH
14.993.960.48
831.82
14.994.792.30
278
CFD-RORIPAUGH II
6.706.360.26
7.768.01
-
6.714.128.27
300
INSURANCE FUND
1.060.766.29
151.528.22
20.301.28
1.191.993.23
305
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
1.904.974.33
11.143.10
15.588.75
1.900.528.68
310
VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND
1.817.670.69
186.247.05
11.004.95
1.992.912.79
320
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
696.004.45
969.118.15
286.033.68
1.379.088.92
325
TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND
1.393.684.24
182.732.88
8.800.00
1.567.617.12
330
CENTRAL SERVICES
-
88.979.00
35.831.31
53.147.69
335
CENTRAL SERVICES
324.788.21
20.365.95
-
345.154.16
340
FACILITIES
436.419.53
343.876.61
125.870.56
654.425.58
350
FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND
65.217.37
133.556.41
-
198.773.78
380
SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND
14.846.945.54
179.714.74
301.917.28
14.724.743.00
381
REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST
-
304.172.60
164.144.52
140.028.08
460
CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND
93.945.34
550.07
-
94.495.41
472
CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE
1.186.079.36
1.541.72
256.851.50
930.769.58
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
2.185.161.38
12.974.36
199.420.36
1.998.715.38
474
AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
198.294.53
293.44
6.330.33
192.257.64
475
CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
3.088.088.26
3.562.48
451.753.78
2.639.896.96
476
CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND
544.866.46
456.84
66.557.84
478.765.46
477
CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND
1.247.409.41
1.628.21
186.196.78
1.062.840.84
478
CFD-RORIPAUGH II
6.004.684.64
6.851.10
1.261.123.46
4.750.412.28
501
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD
10.205.29
35.37
2.923.38
7.317.28
502
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK
99.992.18
555.12
2.161.04
98.386.26
503
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS
40.350.54
188.79
5.867.41
34.671.92
504
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS
3.161.91
226.67
615.62
2.772.96
505
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES
29.509.16
297.85
10.723.92
19.083.09
506
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY
37.049.97
185.41
4.171.63
33.063.75
507
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW
5.305.15
19.12
1.004.21
4.320.06
508
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE
91.524.09
846.50
10.053.72
82.316.87
509
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA
28.337.25
161.37
363.18
28.135.44
510
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE
11.634.09
61.99
628.14
11.067.94
511
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW
2.953.52
15.65
150.92
2.818.25
512
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS
99.090.76
918.91
6.227.93
93.781.74
513
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP
23,408.66
205.49
2,466.68
21,147.47
514
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES
8,449.40
38.70
960.08
7,528.02
515
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES
7,985.91
40.37
570.62
7,455.66
516
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS
56,462.08
308.22
1,831.46
54,938.84
517
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA
1,501.86
7.47
121.42
1,387.91
518
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS
49,940.87
230.00
6,799.93
43,370.94
519
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR
99,664.01
1,055.06
4,214.56
96,504.51
520
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL
209,718.79
1,105.63
13,986.98
196,837.44
521
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH
245,940.20
2,508.95
46,525.82
201,923.33
522
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE
7,094.56
37.74
484.69
6,647.61
523
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
19,110.69
106.05
428.87
18,787.87
524
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON
70,030.40
917.06
18,912.17
52,035.29
525
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS
63,116.22
336.52
3,115.60
60,337.14
526
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION
992.75
4.71
126.68
870.78
527
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE
8,682.49
44.46
518.85
8,208.10
528
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK
456.563.58
2.509.11
13.563.55
445.509.14
529
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT
2.711.40
12.32
183.02
2.540.70
530
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES
35.744.26
209.30
-
35.953.56
701
PENSION RATE STABILIZATION FUND
$ 12.062.756.97
-
1,199.700.64
$ 10.863.056.33
Grand Total:
$ 153.403.098.42
$ 19.248.649.23
$ 26.064.141.99
$146.587.605.66
Journal Entries completed after February's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts I Disbursements columns.
Item No. 5
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance 2020-04 Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code
Pertaining to the Accessory Dwelling Units (Second Reading)
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE CERTAIN SUBSECTIONS OF
SECTION 17.06.050 PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS, ESTABLISHING A NEW CHAPTER 17.23
PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS,
AMENDING TABLE 17.24.040 REGARDING PARKING
REQUIREMENTS, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of
the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to
the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances,
Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days
apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the time of introduction or passage unless a motion
waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council present.
Ordinance No. 2020-04 was first introduced at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 28, 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.2020-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE CERTAIN
SUBSECTIONS OF SECTION 17.06.050 PERTAINING TO
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, ESTABLISHING A NEW
CHAPTER 17.23 PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS, AMENDING TABLE 17.24.040
REGARDING PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND FINDING
THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Effective January 1, 2020, Senate Bill 13 ("SB 13"), Assembly Bill 68 ("AB
68"), and Assembly Bill 881 ("AB 881") amended Government Code Sections 65852.2 and
65852.22 to further limit the standards cities may impose on accessory dwelling units ("ADUs")
and junior accessory dwelling units ("JADUs"). In the absence of a State -compliant ordinance on
January 1, 2020, the City's existing ADU regulations are null and void pursuant to Government
Code Section 65852.2(a)(4), and the City would then be required to approve any ADU that meets
minimal State criteria. Unless the City adopts this ordinance, the City is required to either approve
ADUs in locations and under standards that may have severe negative impacts on the surrounding
community.
Section 2. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine, and declare that:
A. The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance on February 19, 2020, at a
duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time City Staff and interested persons
had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or against this matter.
B. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-06, recommending
approval of the Ordinance by the City Council.
C. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on April 28, 2020,
at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time City Staff and interested
persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or against this matter.
D. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of
information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council.
Section 3. Findings. In approving the proposed Municipal Code amendment, as
required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code,
the City Council hereby makes the following findings that the Ordinance is consistent with the
General Plan as follows:
A. The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located,
as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the general plan, and is
supported by the following policy:
a. Land Use Element Policy 1.2 Promote the use of innovative site planning
techniques that contribute to development of a variety of residential product
styles and designs, including housing suitable for the community's labor force.
B. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines
of the elements of the general plan and is supported by the following policy:
a. Housing Element Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides
a range of housing types in terms of cost, density, and type, and presents the
opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by
balancing jobs and housing types.
C. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent
with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein and is supported
by the following policy:
a. Housing Element Policy 3.3 Periodically review City development standards to
ensure consistency with the General Plan and to ensure high -quality affordable
housing.
Section 4. Table 17.06.030 (Residential districts) in Section 17.06.030 (Use
regulations.) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby amended to amend the row entitled "Accessory dwelling units" as
follows, with all other provisions of Table 17.06.030 remaining unchanged.
Description of use
HR
RR
VL
L-1
L-2
LM
M
H
HR-
SM9
Accessory dwelling units
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Section 5. Table 17.06.050A (Accessory Structures Setbacks for the HR, RR, VL, L-
1, L-2, LM, M and H Zoning Districts) in Section 17.06.050 (Special use standards and
regulations) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby amended to delete the row "Accessory dwelling unit", including
footnotes 4 and 6 to Table 17.06.050A, with all other provisions of Table 17.06.050A remaining
unchanged.
Section 6. Subsection L (Accessory Dwelling Units.) of Section 17.06.050 (Special
use standards and regulations) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the
N
Temecula Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety, with the remaining subsections to be
re -lettered in consecutive order.
Section 7. Chapter 17.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) is hereby added to Title 17
(Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"CHAPTER 17.23 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Section 17.23.010
Purpose and Applicability.
Section 17.23.020
Definitions.
Section 17.23.030
Projects Exempt - Building Permit Approval Only.
Section 17.23.040
General Requirements and Application Procedure.
Section 17.23.050
ADU Standards.
Section 17.23.060
Fees and Utility Connections.
Section 17.23.010 Purpose and Applicability.
The purpose of this chapter is to implement the requirements of Government Code Sections
65852.2 and 65852.22 to allow Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units
in a manner that encourages their development but simultaneously minimizes impacts on traffic,
parking, density, and other areas where the City is still permitted to exercise local control.
Section 17.23.020 Definitions.
"Accessory Dwelling Unit" or "ADU" has the same meaning ascribed in Government Code
section 65852.2, as the same may be amended from time to time.
"Attached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a physical expansion (i.e. addition)
of the Primary Dwelling and shares a common wall with the Primary Dwelling.
"Detached ADU" means an ADU that is constructed as a separate structure from the
Primary Dwelling, which does not share any walls with the Primary Dwelling.
"Existing Structure" means an existing single-family dwelling or other accessory structure
that can be safely converted into habitable space under the California Building Standards Code, as
amended by the City, and other applicable law.
"Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit" or "JADU" has the same meaning ascribed in
Government Code section 65852.22, as the same may be amended from time to time.
"Primary Dwelling", for purposes of this chapter, means the existing or proposed single-
family dwelling on the lot where an ADU would be located.
"Public Transit", for purposes of this chapter, has the meaning ascribed in Government
Code Section 65852.20), as the same may be amended from time to time.
3
Section 17.23.030 Projects Exempt - Building Permit Approval Only
A. An applicant shall not be required to submit an application for an ADU or JADU
permit under this chapter, and may instead seek building permit approval for an ADU or JADU
that satisfies the requirements of Government Code Section 65852.2(e)(1), as the same may be
amended from time to time, and the California Building Standards Code, as amended by the City.
B. An ADU or JADU approved by a building permit only process shall be rented only
for terms of 31 days or longer.
C. The property owner shall record a declaration of restrictions, in a form approved by
the City Attorney, placing the following restrictions on the property, the property owner, and all
successors in interest: (i) the ADU or JADU is to be rented only for terms of 31 days or longer,
unless State law and the City's Municipal Code are both amended to allow short-term rentals; (ii)
the ADU or JADU is not to be sold or conveyed separately from the Primary Dwelling, and (iii) if
there is a JADU on the property, either the JADU or Primary Dwelling shall be occupied by the
owner of record. Proof of recordation of the covenant shall be provided to the City before the City
finals the building permit.
D. Pursuant to Government Code section 65852.2(e), the City shall ministerially
approve an application for a building permit within a residential or mixed -use zone to create any
of the following:
1. One ADU or JADU per lot with a proposed or existing single-family
dwelling if all of the following apply:
a. The ADU or JADU is within the proposed space of a single-family
dwelling or existing space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure and may include an
expansion of not more than 150 square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as the existing
accessory structure. An expansion beyond the physical dimensions of the existing accessory
structure shall be limited to accommodating ingress and egress.
family dwelling.
b. The space has exterior access from the proposed or existing single-
The side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety.
d. The JADU complies with the requirements of Section 65852.22 and
with the requirements set forth in subsection E below.
2. One detached, new construction ADU that does not exceed four -foot side
and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The ADU may
be combined with a JADU described in paragraph 1 above. The ADU shall be no more than 800
square feet in size, with a height limit of 16 feet.
3. One ADU within the portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures
that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms,
passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each unit complies with state building standards for
dwellings. If requested, multiple ADUs shall be allowed, up to the number of ADUs that equals
25 percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units in the structure.
4. Not more than two Detached ADUs located on a lot that has an existing
multifamily dwelling, subject to a height limit of 16 feet and four -foot rear yard and side setbacks.
E. In accordance with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65852.22,
JADUs shall comply with the following requirements, unless State law is amended to set forth
different standards in which case State law standards will govern:
1. A JADU shall be a minimum of 220 square feet and a maximum of 500 square feet
of gross floor area. The gross floor area of a shared sanitation facility shall not be included in the
maximum gross floor area of a JADU.
2. A JADU must be contained entirely within the walls of the existing or proposed
single-family dwelling.
3. A separate exterior entry from the main entrance to the single-family dwelling shall
be provided to serve a JADU.
4. A JADU may include separate sanitation facilities, or may share sanitation facilities
with the existing single-family dwelling.
5. A JADU shall include an efficiency kitchen which shall include all of the following:
a. a cooking facility with appliances.
b. a food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size
in relation to the size of the JADU.
6. No additional parking is required for a JADU.
7. The JADU or Primary Residence shall be occupied by the owner of record.
8. The City shall not issue a building permit until the applicant provides a will serve
letter from the local water and sewer provider. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a private sewage
disposal system is being used, the applicant must provide documentation showing approval by the
local health officer in lieu of the will serve letter by the local sewer provider.
Section 17.23.040 General Requirements and Application Procedure.
A. Before constructing an ADU or converting an Existing Structure to an ADU that
does not fall under the "building permit approval only" requirements in Section 17.23.030, the
applicant shall obtain permits in accordance with the requirements of this section.
B. All ADUs shall satisfy the requirements of the California Building Standards Code,
as amended by the City.
C. In accordance with State law, ADUs are an accessory use or an accessory structure
to the Primary Dwelling on the lot. ADUs shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density
for the lot.
D. Applications for ADUs shall be completed in accordance with Section 17.03.030
of this Development Code. The application for the ADU must be signed by the owner(s) of the
parcel of land.
E. The Director of Community Development or his/her designee shall ministerially
review and approve an ADU permit application and shall not require a public hearing, provided
that the submitted application is complete and demonstrates that the ADU complies with the
requirements contained in this chapter and any other applicable law.
F. ADU permit applications subject to ministerial approval shall be processed within
the timelines established by California Government Code Section 65852.2. The City shall approve
the ADU permit within 60 days of receiving the application, or as the deadline required by
Government Code Section 65852.2 may be amended from time to time.
G. Where an ADU permit application is submitted with an application for a Primary
Dwelling that is subject to discretionary review under this Code, the ADU permit application will
be considered separately without discretionary review or a public hearing, following action on the
portion of the project subject to discretionary review.
H. In addition to obtaining an ADU permit, the applicant shall be required to obtain a
building permit and any other applicable construction permits prior to the construction of the ADU.
Section 17.23.050 ADU Standards.
Except those ADUs approved pursuant to Subsection 17.23.030, ADUs shall comply with
the following standards:
A. Location Restrictions: One ADU shall be allowed on a lot with a proposed or
existing Primary Dwelling that is zoned residential.
B. Development Standards:
1. Size restrictions. If there is an existing Primary Dwelling, an Attached ADU shall
not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross floor area for the Primary Dwelling. An Attached ADU
that is proposed with a new Primary Dwelling shall not exceed 1,200 square feet in floor area. A
Detached ADU shall not exceed 1,200 square feet in floor area. In no case shall an ADU be less
than an "efficiency unit" as defined in Section 17958.1 of Health and Safety Code with respect to
square footage.
2. Height restrictions. An ADU shall not exceed 16 feet in height.
3. Transfer. An ADU shall not be sold, transferred, or assigned separately from the
Primary Dwelling, but may be rented. The ADU shall not be used for short term rentals for less
than 31 days.
4. Setback. No setback shall be required for an ADU that is within an Existing
Structure or new ADU that is constructed in the same location and with the same dimensions as
an Existing Structure. For all other ADUs, the required setback from side and rear lot lines shall
be four feet. An ADU shall comply with all required front yard setbacks otherwise required by the
Municipal Code.
5. Lot Coverage. An ADU shall conform to all lot coverage requirements applicable
to the zoning district in which the property is located, except where the application of the lot
coverage regulations would not permit construction of an 800 square foot ADU that is 16 feet in
height with four -foot side and rear yard setbacks.
6. Historic Resources. An ADU that has the potential to adversely impact any
historical resource listed on the California Register of Historic Resources, shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the "Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of
Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing
Historic Buildings" found at 36 CFR 68.3, as amended from time to time. An ADU shall also
comply with all local historic register requirements, as well as all objective local requirements,
ordinances, or Specific Plans that pertain to historic resources.
C. Design and Features:
1. Design. The ADU shall have the same design, architecture, colors and materials of
the Primary Dwelling, and shall comply with any objective design standards adopted by the City
that are applicable to the zoning district or Specific Plan area where the ADU is located.
2. Fire Sprinklers. ADUs are required to provide fire sprinklers if they are required
for the Primary Dwelling.
3. An ADU shall have a separate exterior access.
D. Covenant Required: The property owner shall record a declaration of restrictions,
in a form approved by the City Attorney, placing the following restrictions on the property, the
property owner, and all successors in interest: (i) the ADU is to be rented only for terms of 30 days
or longer; and (ii) the ADU is not to be sold or conveyed separately from the Primary Dwelling.
Proof of recordation of the covenant shall be provided to the City before the City finals the building
permit.
E. Parking Requirements:
1. In addition to the off-street parking space(s) required for the Primary Dwelling, one
off-street parking space shall be provided for each ADU, except when:
a. The ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of Public Transit;
b. The ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic
district;
C. The ADU is part of a proposed or existing Primary Dwelling or accessory structure;
d. The ADU is located in an area where on -street parking permits are required but not
offered to an ADU occupant; or
e. The ADU is located within one block of a city -approved and dedicated parking
space for a car share vehicle.
2. When the ADU is created by converting or demolishing a garage, carport or
covered parking structure, replacement of parking space(s) eliminated by the construction of the
ADU shall not be required as long as the ADU remains in use as a legal ADU.
Section 17.23.060 Fees and Utility Connections.
A. ADUs and JADUs shall have adequate water and sewer services. These services
may be provided from the water and sewer points of connection for the Primary Dwelling and not
be a separate set of services.
B. The owner of an ADU or JADU shall be subject to the payment of all sewer, water
and other applicable fees, including impact fees set forth in Government Code section 66000 et
seq., except as follows:
ADUs that are less than 750 square feet shall not be subject to impact fees.
2. ADUs that are 750 square feet or more shall be charged impact fees that are
proportional in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit.
C. Prior to receiving a building permit, the owner of an ADU or JADU must submit
letters of service availability for water and sewer disposal to the Building Official.
Section 8. Table 17.24.040 (Parking Spaces Required) of Chapter 17.24 (Off -Street
Parking and Loading) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended as
follows, with all other provisions of Table 17.24.040 remaining unchanged:
Description of Use
Required Number of Spaces
Accessory Dwelling Unit
1 parking space per newly constructed
Detached ADU except as otherwise provided
in Chapter 17.23. The parking space may be
provided as tandem parking on the driveway.
Section 9. California Environmental Quality Act Exemption. The City Council
determines that this ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act, (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., ("CEQA") and
the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) because this zoning
ordinance implements the provisions of Government Code Section 65852.2 and is therefore
exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 and California Code of
Regulations Section 15282(h). To the extent that any provisions of this ordinance are not exempt
pursuant to Section 15282(h), the amendments are not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.
Section 10. Submittal of Ordinance. The Community Development Director, or his
designee, shall submit a copy of the Ordinance to the Department of Housing and Community
Development within 60 days after adoption of this Ordinance.
Section 11. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law.
Section 12. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after
passage.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26th day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 2020-04 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of April, 2020, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof
held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
to
Item No. 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance 2020-05 Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to
Conform with the Density Bonus Ordinance Law Under the California Government
Code (Long Range Project Number LR19-1597) (Second Reading)
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE REGULATIONS TO
CONFORM WITH DENSITY BONUS LAW (CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65915) AND FINDING THE
ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of
the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to
the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances,
Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days
apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the time of introduction or passage unless a motion
waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council present.
Ordinance No. 2020-05 was first introduced at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 28, 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO.2020-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REVISE
REGULATIONS TO CONFORM WITH DENSITY BONUS
LAW (CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
65915) AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT
FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT
WHEREAS, the State Legislature has declared that the lack of housing, including
providing for a variety of housing types for all income levels and special needs groups, is a critical
problem that threatens the economic, environmental, and social quality of life in California.
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65583 requires that the City's Housing Element
address governmental constraints to the development of housing, including providing for a variety
of housing types for all income levels.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's 2014-2021
Housing Element on January 28, 2014.
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65915 requires that local governments adopt
procedures for processing a density bonus application.
WHEREAS, the City's Development Code already allows for density bonuses and
development concessions, but Program 4 of the City's 2014-2021 Housing Element provides that
the City will establish a density bonus program that is consistent with updated versions of Density
Bonus Law.
WHEREAS, the Legislature amended Government Code Section 65915 in 2019 to clarify
certain provisions of Density Bonus Law, and the City wishes to update the Development Code to
ensure consistency with State law and clarify how to implement the density bonus program.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does
hereby find, determine, and declare that:
A. The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance on February 19, 2020, at a
duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested
persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or against this matter.
B. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-07, recommending
approval of the Ordinance by the City Council.
C. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on April 28, 2020,
at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested
persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or against this matter.
D. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of
information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council.
SECTION 2. Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula in approving
the proposed Municipal Code amendment hereby makes the following findings as required by
Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. This Ordinance is consistent with State Housing Law, the Temecula 2014-2021
Housing Element, and the Temecula General Plan. This Ordinance clarifies the City's density
bonus provisions to conform to the requirements of California Government Code Section 65915,
as most recently amended by Assembly Bill 1763 during the 2019 legislative session.
B. The proposed Ordinance amends portions of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal
Code to conform with State Density Bonus Law and with the goals, policies, programs, and
guidelines of the City's General Plan. Specifically, the Ordinance implements the following goals
and policies contained in the City's 2014-2021 Housing Element:
1. Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of
housing types in terms of cost, density, and type, and presents the opportunity for local residents
to live and work in the same community by balancing jobs and housing types;
2. Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that
accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population, and provide opportunities to meet
Temecula's fair share of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate -income housing by
promoting the City's program of density bonuses and incentives;
3. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private, and nonprofit efforts in
the development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs groups;
4. Policy 5.2 Support efforts to ensure that all income segments of the
community have unrestricted access to appropriate housing.
C. The housing developments that would be authorized by this Ordinance would be
established and maintained in a manner consistent with the General Plan, specifically the policies
described above, and all applicable provisions therein.
SECTION 3. Subsection "Q" of Section 17.10.020 (Supplemental Development
Standards) of Chapter 17.10 (Supplemental Development Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the
Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows, with all other
subsections of Section 17.10.020 to remain the same:
"Q. Density Bonus Law.
1. In addition to any other review required for a proposed housing development, applications
for a density bonus shall be filed with the planning director on a form approved by the
director. The application shall be filed concurrently with an application for a development
plan review or administrative approval. At the time the application is submitted, the
applicant shall pay a density bonus application fee, established by resolution of the City
Council.
2. City staff shall process the application for a density bonus in the same manner as, and
concurrently with, the application for a development plan review or administrative
approval that is required by this Code.
3. The applicant shall submit reasonable documentation to establish eligibility for a requested
density bonus, incentives or concessions, waivers or reductions of development standards,
and parking ratios.
4. For a housing development qualifying pursuant to the requirements of Government Code
Section 65915, the City shall grant a density bonus in an amount specified by Government
Code Section 65915. Except as otherwise required by Government Code Section 65915,
the density bonus units shall not be included when calculating the total number of housing
units that qualifies the housing development for a density bonus. Except as otherwise
required by Government Code Section 65915, the amount of the density bonus shall not
exceed 35 percent.
5. For the purpose of calculating the density bonus, the "maximum allowable residential
density" shall be the maximum density allowed under the zoning ordinance and land use
element of the general plan, or, if a range of density is permitted, the maximum allowable
density for the specific zoning range and land use element of the general plan applicable to
the project. Where the density allowed under the zoning ordinance is inconsistent with the
density allowed under the land use element of the general plan, the maximum density
allowed in the general plan shall prevail.
6. The City shall grant the applicant the number of incentives and concessions required by
Government Code Section 65915. The City shall grant the specific concession(s) or
incentive(s) requested by the applicant, unless it makes any of the relevant written findings
stated in Government Code Section 65915(d). Senior citizen housing developments that
qualify for a density bonus shall not receive any incentives or concessions, unless
Government Code Section 65915 is amended to specifically require that local agencies
grant incentives or concessions for senior citizen housing developments.
7. Except as restricted by Government Code Section 65915, the applicant for a density bonus
may submit a proposal for the waiver or reduction of development standards that have the
effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development incorporating
the density bonus and any incentives or concessions granted to the applicant. A request for
a waiver or reduction of development standards shall be accompanied by documentation
demonstrating that the waiver or reduction is physically necessary to construct the housing
development with the additional density allowed pursuant to the density bonus and
incorporating any incentives or concessions required to be granted. The City shall approve
a waiver or reduction of a development standard, unless it finds that:
3
a. The application of the development standard does not have the effect of physically
precluding the construction of a housing development at the density allowed by the
density bonus and with the incentives or concessions granted to the applicant;
b. The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have a specific, adverse
impact, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon
health, safety, or the physical environment, and for which there is no feasible
method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact;
The waiver or reduction of the development standard would have an adverse impact
on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources;
or
d. The waiver or reduction of the development standard would be contrary to state or
federal law.
8. The applicant may request, and the City shall grant, a reduction in parking requirements in
accordance with Government Code Section 65915(p), as that section maybe amended from
time to time.
9. The applicant shall comply with all requirements stated in Government Code Section
65915.
10. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City to ensure the continued
affordability of all affordable units or the continued reservation of such units for qualifying
senior citizens. Prior to receiving a building permit for any project that receives a density
bonus or any incentive, concession, waiver, or reduction of development standards
pursuant to this section, such agreement shall be recorded as a covenant against the
property.
11. For any development project that is granted a density bonus or other benefit pursuant to
this section, the affordable units that qualify the project as eligible for a density bonus,
must be constructed concurrently with or prior to the construction of any market rate units.
In addition, the affordable units must be integrated with the market rate units so that there
is a mix of affordable and market rate units, if any, in each building of the development
project.
12. An applicant shall not receive a density bonus or any other incentive or concession if the
housing development would be excluded under Government Code Section 65915.
13. The provisions of this subdivision shall be interpreted to fulfill the requirements of
Government Code Section 65915. Any changes to that Government Code Section 65915
shall be deemed to supersede and govern any conflicting provisions contained herein."
SECTION 4. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby finds, in the
exercise of its independent judgment and analysis, that this Ordinance is exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as there is no possibility that this Ordinance would
have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guideline Section
15061(b)(3). More specifically, this Ordinance merely incorporates State law, allowing applicants
to seek a density bonus pursuant to Government Code Section 65915. A Notice of Exemption has
been prepared and will be filed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any section subsection, subdivision, paragraph,
sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation,
the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection,
subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, regardless of the fact that any one or
more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via
legislation.
SECTION 6. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify
to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be
published and posted in the manner required by law.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days
after passage.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26th day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 2020-05 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Temecula on the 28th day of April, 2020, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held
on the 26th day of May, 2020, the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Item No. 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Extend Terms of Appointment for Planning Commissioner Lanae Turley-Trejo
and Old Town Local Review Board Members Annette Brown and Peg Moore
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council extend the terms of appointment for
Planning Commissioner Lanae Turley-Trejo and Old Town Local Review Board Members
Annette Brown and Peg Moore to October 10, 2020.
BACKGROUND: On June 15, 2020, the terms of appointment for Planning
Commissioner Lanae Turley-Trejo and Old Town Local Review Board Members Annette Brown
and Peg Moore, will expire. Given the current situation with the COVID-19 pandemic and the
closure of the Council Chambers for in -person public attendance, staff anticipates challenges in
the recruitment and selection of board and commission members at the present time. If extended,
these three terms could be matched with the three terms expiring on October 10, 2020 (CS —
Dale Borgeson, PTSC — Skip Carter and Ivan Moses) and a collective recruitment could be
completed. The City Council will be able to conduct a much more robust recruitment in the Fall,
jointly with all six terms, and be able to conduct a more effective review of candidates at a public
meeting, subject to the conditions existing at the time related to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is
therefore recommended that the terms of appointment for Planning Commissioner Lanae Turley-
Trejo and Old Town Local Review Board Members Annette Brown and Peg Moore be extended
to October 10, 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: None
Item No. 8
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing to Approve Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial
Customers for Fiscal Year 2020-21
PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC
HEARING IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOLID WASTE AND
RECYCLING RATES FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
BACKGROUND: The Franchise Agreement between the City of Temecula and CR&R
Incorporated stipulates the conditions upon which rates may be adjusted on an annual basis. Per
the agreement, these rates shall be adjusted each July 1st to reflect the changes in various applicable
indices. As such, the commercial rates are due to adjust for fiscal year 2020-21. In addition to the
rate adjustment based on indices, CR&R has requested an additional increase in commercial rates
due to Extraordinary Costs as allowed in the Franchise Agreement. The requested additional rate
+increase is 9.98% of the current commercial rates, due in part to requirements related to State
Mandated commercial recycling programs and operation of the Anaerobic Digestor facility.
In recent years the State of California passed Assembly Bill 341, the Mandatory Commercial
Recycling Law, and Assembly Bill 1826, the Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling Law.
These laws require all businesses within a certain service area to participate in the State Mandated
recycling programs. The costs and implementation of these programs falls on local jurisdictions
and the local waste haulers. In an effort to not significantly impact any one waste sector all at once,
the implementation and any increase in rates have been put into effect over the course of time since
the adoption of these State Mandated programs.
In addition to the State Mandates, China's recycling import ban and restrictions have significantly
impacted the entire waste management sector and as a result have reduced the value of recyclable
materials across the globe. China instituted these restrictions, known as China Sword, effective
January 2018. Prior to China's import ban, over 60% of the materials recycled on the West Coast
were going to China. Those same materials continue to inundate waste management collection
activities without a viable resource for disposal or cost recovery. CR & R has been reluctant to
adjust commercial rates in hopes the recycling market would rebound, but unfortunately that has
not occurred and therefore waste haulers can no longer absorb the loss of recycling revenue.
Pursuant to the Franchise Agreement with CR & R, the rates charged for refuse collection and
recycling for residential and commercial services within the City of Temecula is subject to annual
review and modification, based upon changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and changes to
the Riverside County landfill tipping fees, as well as Extraordinary Costs to meet compliance
measures instituted by the State Mandate Laws. Therefore, all Commercial Customers within the
City of Temecula will incur a rate adjustment to include a 1.80% increase due to change in CPI, a
.76 cent per month rate change in landfill fees, and a 9.98% increase due to Extraordinary Costs
to comply with state mandate laws. Commercial rates vary based on the bin size and frequency of
collection, but are generally expected to increase on average 12% in FY2020-21, per the attached
CR & R Rate Schedule.
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution and set the public hearing concerning the
approval the Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers for July 28, 2020. Staff
will proceed with noticing each affected commercial customer in the City with regards to the
proposed rate increase with a minimum of forty-five (45) days prior to the public hearing.
FISCAL IMPACT: Solid Waste and Recycling services for Commercial Customers are
paid for directly by the property owner or business owner receiving services. No additional costs
will be incurred by the City of Temecula.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution
2. CR & R Rate Schedule
RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOLID
WASTE AND RECYCLING RATES FOR COMMERCIAL
CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City of Temecula and CR & R Incorporated entered into an exclusive
solid waste Franchise Agreement on May 28, 1992, as amended on August 27,1996, June 24, 1997,
July 25, 2000, June 13, 2006, October 2015, and June 14, 2016, for the collection, transportation,
recycling, composting and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and for providing
temporary bin/roll off services in the City.
Section 2. Pursuant to the Franchise Agreement it specifically provides for rate
adjustments which may be adjusted on an annual basis, and they shall be adjusted each July 1 St,
based on certain criteria, and subject to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), and changes to the County
of Riverside landfill tipping fees, and any extraordinary costs which may be as a result of State
mandated programs.
Section 3. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics for January 2019 through
December 2019, the designated CPI has increased by 1.80%.
Section 4. The County of Riverside's Waste Management Department will adjust their
landfill disposal rate, for a monthly rate increase for commercial customers of .76 cents.
Section 5. The Extraordinary Cost increase is to include a rate increase of 9.98% for
commercial customers. Commercial rates vary based on the bin size and frequency of collection.
Section 6. The City Council of the City of Temecula herby acknowledges and appoints
the 28th day of July, 2020, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible, in the City
Council Chambers at City hall, located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, as the time
and place for the public hearing on the proposed solid waste and recycling rates for commercial
customers for fiscal year 2020-21. At the public hearing, the City Council will hear and consider
all objections or protests, if any, to the proposed rates. The City Council may continue the hearing
from time to time.
Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to publish notice of the time and place of
the hearing pursuant to Government Code Section 6066 in the manner required by law.
Section 8. Each affected commercial customer and commercial property owner in the
City of Temecula shall be mailed notice of the proposed rate increase in the manner provided by
law at least forty-five (45) days prior to the public hearing on July 28, 2020.
Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26th day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
CITY (IF TEMFCULA
EXHIBIT "D"
Schedule of !Cates
(effective July 1, 2020)
1 Mechanized sinplc family detached residential collection, recycling, asmposting, transfer, and disposal grantee billing
Monthly Raw (without Extraordinary Recycling Foe) $ 22.21
Monthly AD Rate b 2.18
Extraordinary Recycling Fee 5 0.54
2 Mechanized single family detached residential callectlen, recycling, composting, transfer, and disposal parcel charge
Monthly Rate (without Extraordinary Recycling Fee) 5 22.27
Monthly AD Rate 5 2_18
Extraordinary Recycling Fee $ 0.54
3 Mechanized single Family detached residential additional refuse, and composting container grantee billing
Monthly hate- $ [0 15
4 Single family detached residential additional bulky item pick up • grantee billing
Pick Up Rate: $ 11,87
5 Commercial. industrial, and multi -family residential refuse monthly bin rates ( one 2 cubic yard bin) with the following pick ups per weak
1 x week
$
115.20
2 x week
$
229.09
3 x week
$
342,95
4 x week
$
456.81
5 x week
$
570.69
6 x wcck
$
684.55
7 x week
$
798.44
Compacted 2 Cubic Yard monthly rate: 2.5 x monthly rate
6 Commercial, industrial, and mutti-family residential refuse monthly bin rates (one 3 cubic yard bin ) with the fallowing pick ups per week:
l x week
S
131.88
2 x wcck
5
262,43
3 x week
S
393,01
4 x week
S
523.56
5 x week
S
654,08
6 x wcck
S
794.64
7 x week
$
915.21
Compacted 3 Cubic Yard monthly: 2.5 x monthly rate
7 Commercial, industrial, and multi-family'trsidential recycling monthly bin rates ( one 3 cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per wcck
I x week
S
56.27
2 x week
S
112.53
3 x week
S
168.78
4 x week
S
225.04
5 x wed k
S
281.26
6 x week
5
337.54
7 x week
5
393.76
8 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential refuse monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic yard bin ) wilh the following pick ups per week:
I x week
S
148.59
2 x week
S
295,90
3 x week
S
443.18
4 x week
S
590.49
5 x wcck
5
737.77
6 x week
%
885.04
7 x week
S
LD32.35
Compacted 4 Cubic Yard monthly rate; 2.5 x monthly rate
CITY ON TEYIECULA
EXHIBIT "D"
Schedule ol` hales
(effective duly L. 2020)
9 Commercial. industrial. and multi -(-amity residential recycling monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic yard bin ) with the fullowing pick ups per week
I x week
S
74.48
2 x week
S
149.01
3 x week
S
223.47
4 N isock
$
297.98
5 x week
$
372.48
6 x week
$
446.98
7 x week
$
521.44
Commercial, industrial_ and multi-fsmily residential recvclina
monthly cart rare t une 96 gallon cart } with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week
$
50.24
10 Temporary 3 cubic yard bin rate.
S
105.37
11 Extra Temporary or Regular Service pick up:
$
58.66 per pick up
(includes all bin sins 2. 3 and 4 yards)
12 Commercial and Rolloff Setup Fee
$
50.00
13 Redeliver and reinstatement rate:
$
42.18 per occurrence
14 Roll -off ❑elivery I'm
S
73.56 per bin
15 Roll-offdisposal rate_
$
238.18 +
16 Roll-offrecyclingrate;
$
239.13 plus market value
17 atoll -off compactor rate:
$
331.61 +
18 Roll-0ffrecycling compactor rate:
$
331.63 plus market value
19 Scheduled Extra Green Waste pick up (up to 10 bags):
$
10.00 per pick up
20 Nan -Scheduled F.xtra Careen Waste pick up (up to 10 bags]:
$
25.00 per pick up
21 E-Waste Pick up:
no Charge
22 "Hard to service" vehicle usage rate:
no charge
23 "Hard to service' bin moving rate:
no charge
24 Special bin lids (lockingl03L) rate:
no charge
25 Deodorizing 1 replacing bin rate:
no charge
26 Recycle Ilia Contmtrinalion
$
49.93
27 MRF Fee:
$
51.6$ per ton
23 C&D Fcc:
$
51.68 perton
29 Inert Pispoml:
$
133.34 per load
30 AD Fee:
$
81.26 per ton
31 Extra Food Waste Pail
5
7.34 each
CITY OF 1 U'%lECUi-#
EXHIBIT "D"
Schcdolc of Rates
(effective July I, 2020)
Commercial QrIcanic AD Rates
32 Commercial. indugrin[, and multi-ramily residential nun -food monthly bin rates ( one 2 cubic yard
bin) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x wcck
5
144.81
2 x week
S
299.60
3 x week
5
432.39
4 x week
$
576,18
5 x week
S
720,00
6 x wcck
$
263,78
7 x week
S
1,007.58
33 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential food monthly bin rates ( one 2 cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week
x week
S
215.17
2 x week
S
429.36
3 x week
5
643.51
4 x week
S
857.65
5 x week
S
1,071.86
6 x week
$
1,286.00
7 x week
S
1.500.16
34 Commercial_ industrial, and multi -Family residcntial non-food monthly bin rates ( one 3 cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week
I x week
S
191.11
2 x week
S
391.25
3 x week
$
571.34
4 x week
$
761.47
5 x week
S
951.55
6 x week
S
I.141.67
7 x week
$
L331.80
35 Commercial, industrial. and multi -family residential non-food monthly bin rates ( 64-gallon cart) with the following pick ups per week
1 x week
$
39.61
2 x week
$
79.22
3 x week
$
118.84
4 x week
$
15945
5 x week
$
19907
6 x week
$
237.69
Extra pickup
$
29.08
36 Commercial, industrial. and multi-tamily residential food monthly bin rates ( 64-gallon cart) with the following pick ups per vvcck
x week
$
53,43
2 x week
S
106.86
3 x week
$
160.29
4 x week
$
213.73
5 x week
$
267.16
6 x week
S
32061
Extra pickup
$
39.13
m-RV BxmmmWmq�g �4EAgA
$aN
�V [NY NOG R.4
fL
pH pNNMyyINN qy py yN wwwHNw wwwwww
SOO�Y]d.e [h-�fG p�r, V, R one P WN
p�nc:n aat� ofr`-ia M1ti°�`si '..iv�i �. �i nr.
a
wwwwww w.nw ea bfNNNb NnN Ne'M
yb
L
E g �
a w
g� d
S
w Epp Gy RR pG�GN �Gp pG�p
4 w
rU
ww.NNN ... .......
m me& mm mm
M
ndea de e5d ri
c
U
rn�Nwww ww N
A m 9 P P P P
= r m
=o w Y
g..1 NU]M NM ww
� o
w � N
� r ry ry w w m
o N p 4 4 q m
� ww ww ww
e�}� E U q R Y� no p o o�� v +y v t
Q MIE E E E$ E j ah{ Y 8$ n
d a n a i¢ a
� Y W �rY-u �M aVNN df {y NiO r
o nn me v�vry W wwn
� b C 6d Od Epp qt,7 Y Y qG G•N q
`o ww ww wwui vi en w.a wgwEE .eaNw.aEs? �w22
m e— mmm$w .mm�m m
[l `e
u�9
w wNw Y� tlr w e, NNfA NNN .ff Nw -rnww n -- Nww w
h tom. W [•'� � Q� m eNp..�. 9 fN, t m a `� �( 9g F O9�I O r O P A 0 w�
�Ta =mina r2$ n�+Ac?1r md
w a e N Al M M M M Neff M N N N N y.. A w n. p e w N M N w w w w
�q r' m �� 8 � � �����n •�'. ir.��i iv v� fg r�ov`"irna
wN www ww wN[wy wiAww wiH ryw [Myy wNN N N (N� yMp auy� b pcp4
dN i`l V w iG l� NMY+fiA W m 4mNrvcR t^, �n1r W mT
M M-- n N .A M w w w w n w w www N w w w w w w w w lA
GtlryHmoTb
R � 9?�M1.PNYH
eV � r6 m d r R ti pesm�'�n P � Ni94 N•P hYr4i r�Y�
cfr w w w w w w w ...... ....
N N N M n n w n g w
o r N rrn a m o Irv.-fnvw a rrr ri r.Yw
w uyyf yN eyyq ym yn yw nw µw wwµµ µW Y! wNNNNNN
0 0 0 0 0 0 o c a o o b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MNb Mbi?N Nb bef b N N ww Nw wwYi
e eceeti.s dq^a^�' 000cooa
E E �E�f1 Ery Eyy Ey Ey Emm Eyq. Ep E—E�s yy E F S£ E LE £ E E E
'Ileggeee
...... ....
9q .(. w �A en iA v.
qp
pp pp pp p4p pp p4p
$m
b
$$r.�mu?
�''�
���vaigptipi�q
2
m1°mae,gv
�o�rmry�emmm :ono�.tvv�
�`^��o".�vi�`g
RLd�Sim�
p
ooN
N
a
wwwc9 N3w
w1A id
NwNNbMNNbNN
wuh w W Ww w
wwwwwww wwwweawN
wNNHNAfN
3
�
m
m m
h �g�
yS
o�
n
$ u
» 9NG
si 5 Pum
2, S�`E E-q
ao0tz1� �i
�W
Faaaaa
Oaa
Y O
F n
U N
r �
UfYKKK K K2U
C
c a
o �
V 4}
ry ti n b
KrN N R .p n CC r Ni`lrt �imA�>r NYf Y�f]mAC � Nt.] Qu'f .Oti
m'd ,ii OO
•7 � n°��Faw v �v }i �� a �n`�$ v�ma�$ am in n � �m Damn w R n "�' � � ry�� `�
r N N n a n r
N w H YJ N w w N t R N H e R M N e n a E N m n p N p M w w w w w w N w w w w w N e A M N W N W W w
IrM�diC a N
�Of 17 �m�
F
tim rNobG b
r Tyyyy' Y1 �y➢� W
•- v t�0m
�
mN�44 m
o 4 ti l+ cq
a
app
FpW
mm {rye pryq
�®Op 8�
mM
-
�p p p
p
....... M
"i tiN �aSh l+ {4
.......
ry
a sg�v2g
ww ww ww �wp
e- V �mmc]RO
w oo9 N Wb y
o
RPn a 2 Pe�
fd lv6� 1T9 tlF pN Ap
{My W pw� w w�wYw yw
Nmrs T
N e4 y4g
M OYIF OJa
N V �m�mn
pp�rri Nv
inn � m v�
��ea�a n
nO1i �^n pmp �o�ppn �
C
4.
r w w
r
r r N
� N Nth
9
y m p m g w M N
w w N N i4 w N
N M N N N N M
W N w w w w w
w wwww w
H H w N N H1d H
E m m
U �
n n V V 4
Hof MMMe� M
N
gg
9 C
f t
U
� N C] Y of F m O
w w N w w N w w
eri �p C M CC C C>
e h M N H N M N
✓i � m � !+ N e0
M e n m m a n m
v N m� m
N w R w w w w
4 r N ('1 V• n
w 4 A w w w w
O r N M V W n w
. . N K W U a w w
r�—m�ef rvat
rmnmers r`
or_,vn r+ra
�wg�mq
m n'v n�o� "'
fY t
V
w N w N N w w
AAAgT�nAYa�
N N t A N t 9 N H
N a f H M M M e i
��
en N men H r1
M w wwww w w
C• t=
R �F
p
0 0 0 0 9 Q 0
Fi wi fl Pl {� NI Cl
8 Q g g 0 6�
1�1 CF CI Nf M e5 t�f
G 8 G G�
A rf !S A A m �n
4 4 4 4 4 4
n5 rf en m e� i'�
P O d O C C 6 O
H �'j 01 5'1 t'� t7 M M
ggGOo004
P 4o000O
C] S]
4R,
0000GZpp
_
O �OL99
pp0R
S 8888e,8
ppZ]L]
Q4440 P O
44P900
p4p GPG
O OO O f] O O
R � � er
N N
W a'1 immO n 1� �
6 6 er [w n
n R m � � M W
E
C
0
mm Epp pad
���ppO pWp�� ��Ypp ryOry�� �N�pp
�Y�yy
q�
any
V
N N N w w w w
w w w w w N N
N N M N M w y
w y w y g n
w w w w w H N w
E� fi
E E
� C
� �L..L.. t. .t...L.•
C C .t.. t �CC. 5cc AEG
GE � i � � i
�
� � � Z
E E E E
E
F E 54t 44
E E
44 44 44
E E E E E E2
❑ O❑
E E E E E E
G pp gg gg Q
pp gQ 4Q pQ 4Q 4Q
o aaaaa �p
Y nvw[aON
M
�
O
�e�� n�mN
� � �nme]e�
[y �n�r
ryry
u 9N04'� O
pppooppp
ppppppppp pp
'
GR r LV a'.n IM1 Cl
q
rnri ui�w en
r N mvs q�e. �
rC}Y+OF � 0
0 ——N
m
L
V
NW Nol olNw
u
wwwwNww
fA Nww NfY�i NE
NNNNh N N
wN W www
w
HNH Ni'} N H
0 0
�
po
p0p a0a pp
� rrrrr* w
O
V
.-
ppee {{nn
�NnnT�
pp�� ((ryry vy�
�nnnan
a pp
rNC1Y a�n
rr�
pp
� ��
w w w e a N w.
i d e 9 M M N M M
W N N w w m w
w wwww w
w
w wwww N w
`L• w r w M�� 4
N 4� M1��
N d �II W O N O
� N1 VS F- �� n
r r r
r � N ry M t�
N W wwwy+w
w
w NNN»w N
N NNN NN N
N NNN W w w
wNwKNw
N
HHHfRN N eY
E
43 [7 } 3 6 y L
u
wO m 9 m C} csi 2
r
x K x N M M '+ v M �}p r¢ x% �s x x x% p x x x x x x O x x x x x x f{ p x x x x v x R p x x• x N x p
d'rav i'34 u�9�F R'r p7 �Ne'r rtll �bF Ir � nr4�Nib r- 2r�v a-�Q �n P r- 2rNCiY NCO S I��NCiY If w a
W Ail i)MCldl MeMSteol the Uriwd States g'.Nelnmenl ye,e 11 Mmw you knoVf y . SJpited Stales OeVarttnent of Labor
EQll49..�%L y i AeLeae. tnlendrl 4J9L
Lt.S. SUREAU..Q.F LA@Qfi STAFISM
Q =Penn yL5 g0r
Databases, Tables & Calculators by Subject
Charge Cutpvt Qpdan9; A-: mt0 T ro: mw r
Iincludegaphs f indudeannual averages Mnrr_ F- ne ttinnO') U M14rt
Data exdadxd on: March 17, 2020 (4:43; 19 PM)
CPI for All Urban Censurne3a jGPI-Uj
series Id: CW6549A5A012
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Series Title: All items less shelter in Los Angeles -Lang Beach -Anaheim, CA, all urban consurmps, not Seasonally adjusted
Arta:
Los AngeleS-Long Beach-Ananelfg, CA
Stem:
All items less
shelter
Base Aerivd:
1982.944W
b4wntoad: la:.gn
Year
Jan
Feb
Mor
Apr
May
Jw1
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
1J_
Da
Annual
NALFI
NAI.F3
2010
203.971
261.802
201285
20S7t4
MG.399
295 AU
296,T40
lWe34
MA"
206,379
205.234
2OL460
2.05.456
205,120
205.002
2911
209A61
210.664
214.028
21SA98
215.461
213.4106
212.202
212.976
214$64
214.597
214119
212,343
213.285
213.088
211483
2012
214.742
215904
21$.916
214-460
218.457
216,740
MA27
218.077
219.094
22L751
21.8.360
215.92g
217.105
217,366
21&223
2017
213.522
220.919
U1.091
229-452
241521
20.975
20,592
21&636
218,948
219.128
217.484
217335
219.054
219.7S3
21&3$5
39H
218414
219,973
221.974
221.692
222.925
222.942
221330
221.a41
221.494
720.815
21&leg
21&134
22CK745
221351
220.132
leis
214.533
216374
31%281
2MM8
122,010
220.669
222.521
22LOS
219-452
219,TT]
219.247
21&173
219.352
218.621
220083
2011
220.01%
219.36T
219.558
220-293
321.281
22L134
220.439
219,575
219-6T6
22060
218861
21&445
219.144
2W.2T9
319-609
3017
22a,314
221.681
2224M
M-IT2
223.41&
221.265
223.535
223-663
224.951
215.1BB
2.M 503
225.322
223.591
221.d66
2N-594
3910
227.716
229,38T
229,M
230.206
230,818
225.915
230.487
ZX417
331-I25
ML375
211.868
230A95
23OA50
219.655
211.145
2019
231.460
231.19E
3315"
335-395
236.119
234.840
234.910
234.219
MATS
23&399
13621a
234A21
234.609
233.593
235-624
20"
236.840
237.401
12-alorkM Fie-t Ureng6
Series 1d: cWR549ASABL2
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Series Title: All items less shelter in Los Angeles -Long Beach-Anahe3n, CA, all urban cw4L .ors, 09t seasonally adjusted
Arne:
Los Angeles -Lang Beach -Anaheim, CA
Item:
All items less shelter
Base Period:
1982-84=166
00wnload
Q] dal
Year
Jan
F b 34ar Apr
1Jar
Jun
Jul
Au6
Sep
Oet
Nov File
Annual
RALF3
HALF1
2010
3.7
3.2 4.1 4.1
2.7
2.1
2.2
1.7
0.8
1.2
11
1.9
21
3.s
15
2611
25
3.4 4,3 4,7
4.4
4.1
1-1
3.5
AA
4.0
4.4
2.9
3.8
3.9
3.7
2e17.
2.7
2.5 2.1 1.4
lA
1.4
lA
2.4
2.1
3.3
L9
1.7
2.1
1.9
2.2
20"
12
2.3 1A 6-5
0.5
1.1
Ll
0.3
-0.1
-11
A4
0-7
CA
1.2
D1
2OL4
010
-0.4 8.4 10
14
1-8
1-7
15
1.2
OJ1
03
4.6
0.9
0.7
DA
2615
-1.9
-1.6 -1.2 -1.1
-CA
-1.6
6-1
-0.3
-O.d
85
04
0-9
0.6
-1.2
04
1016
2.8
1.4 CA 017
_ 3
02
4L9
47
0.0
5.4
-62
0.1
0.3
0.6
-0-2
2017
63
L.8 13 lA
1.2
SA
IA
1.9
2.4
2.1
9.6
3.1
1.7
1,0
23
2016
3.4
3.5 33 3.1
31
3.0
3.1
310
2.8
3r
2.8
2.1
3.1
32
2,9
2019
1.6
0.8 12 23
2.3
7.1
1A
L7
2.1
2.2
19
1.7
1.8
LT
19
2628
2.3
2.7
Home
Subjects Data Toots
Publications
Economic Releases
Students
Beta
INFO
What's hew
FAQ*
i
J!7
A.z
A i
Glib s ru
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATIST ICS
About dL5
r e p FU
Postal Square Building
2Ma55acht15Ett5AVenue HE
Find ?[!fl6L
Washington, DC 20212.OMI
Jolnourllai LgLis
RESOURCES
ABOUTTHISSITE
�[lSneLtor General (Gig
i5 ternap
�ydgetandPgrFormancg
;=i) {jyBl.q�,Anj4[ll7atiOnAC
'Jo Fear Att
ea-vacy-&5etunly
Lg
Statement
4i4LURPM
L 111 king 4,Gq py-right tnfa
Irnugg tWehsit-Nof'ICL
slu_k1U1Ql1al5
112
RIVErtSMCOuNrr
► . � -DEPARTMENT OF
Hm,TW Kemkomp, GewiTTIMaFT0ger-ChiefENgh1eer
DATE: April 13, 2020
TO: Waste Haulers
FROM: Sandra Green - Assistant General Manager -
Riverside County Department of Waste Resources
ItE.- Disposal Fee Increase- FY 2020/2021
The riverside County Department of Waste Resources (Department) is responsible for assuring
that there is, and will be in the future, sufficient and accessible landfill space to properly serve
the population of the County in its disposal needs, To fulfill this mandate, the Department
continually maintains and -expands County landfill sites, and encourages, supports and develops
recycling programs that minimize the dependence on landfill disposal facilities.
Due to sustained increases in labor expenses, capital improvement costs, regulatory compliance
costs and closed site maintenance, an increase in disposal rates is essential to allow for continued
and improved services_ This letter serves as a notice that subject to approval by the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors, landfill disposal rates will increase in FY 20121 by the Consumer
Price Index (CPI), which is 303% for calendar year 2019. if approved, the new rates will
become effective for tonnage deliveries starting on July 1, 2020,
The Department has eliminated the rate for processed green waste used as Alternative Daily
Cover (ADC). Processed green waste used as erosion control at the landfills will continue to be
charged at the $10 per ton rate for the foreseeable future, as it provides a beneficial use to the
landfill system.
Thank you for your past cooperation and support.
SGV:sg
cc- Keith Jones, LEA
Item No. 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Community Development Director
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve a Resolution Regarding the Return of Funds to the US Department of
Housing and Urban Development
PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REGARDING THE RETURN OF FUNDS TO THE
US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT
BACKGROUND: In 2012, the City was awarded by the United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") $608,888.00 in Community Development Block Grant
("CBDG") funds for the Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Equipment Improvement Project
("Project"). On April 28, 2015, the City Council approved a purchase and installation agreement
with Nature Works, Inc., in the amount of $483,170 for the construction of the Project.
Nature Works did not adequately perform under the contract, and the City advised HUD that there
had been several delays with the contractor completing the Project and that the City was assessing
liquidated damages on the contractor as of February 1, 2017 at $1,000 per day. The City
subsequently sued Nature Works for breach of contract, specific performance, declaratory relief,
conversion, and intentional interference with contractual relation.
After consultation with HUD, on November 14, 2017, the City processed a Substantial
Amendment to the 2012-13, 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 Annual Action Plans and re -
programed all of the remaining funds budgeted for the Project totaling $251,516 into the Old Town
Sidewalks — Boardwalk Replacement project. Specifically, the following amounts were
reprogramed to the Old Town Sidewalks - Boardwalk Replacement project:
2012-13 Program Year: $196,832.25
2016-17 Program Year: $64,684
On April 6, 2020, the City received a letter from HUD requesting that the City repay $412,055.75
because the Project, as it was originally designed, contracted and paid for with CDBG funds, was
not ultimately constructed. HUD's letter stated that the City will be able to utilize the $412,055.75
it repays for other CDBG eligible projects.
Staff recommends that the City Council authorizes the Finance Department to repay $412,055.75
from non -Federal funds to the HUD. The repayment will come in the form of cancelling the
Project in the Integrated Disbursement and Information System ("IDIS"), and providing to HUD
documentation that $412,055.75 has been allocated in a local City account for use on future CDBG
eligible projects.
FISCAL IMPACT: On April 6, 2020, the City received a letter from HUD requesting
that the City repay $412,055.75 because the Project, as it was originally designed, contracted and
paid for with CDBG funds was not ultimately constructed. HUD's letter stated that the City will
be able to utilize the $412,055.75 it repays for other CDBG eligible projects. HUD has confirmed
via telephone call with the City Manager that payment may be made by July 1, 2020.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution
2. Letter from HUD
RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA REGARDING THE RETURN OF FUNDS
TO THE US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council finds and determines as follows:
A. In 2012, the City was awarded by the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development ("HUD") $608,888.00 in Community Development Block Grant ("CBDG")
funds for the Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Equipment Improvement Project ("Project").
B. On April 28, 2015, the City Council approved a purchase and installation agreement
with Nature Works, Inc., in the amount of $483,170 for the construction of the Project.
C. Nature Works did not adequately perform under the contract, and the City advised
HUD that there had been several delays with the contractor completing the Project and that the
City was assessing liquidated damages on the contractor as of February 1, 2017 at $1,000 per day.
The City subsequently sued Nature Works for breach of contract, specific performance,
declaratory relief, conversion, and intentional interference with contractual relation.
D. After consultation with HUD, on November 14, 2017, the City processed a
Substantial Amendment to the 2012-13, 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18 Annual Action Plans and
re -programed all of the remaining funds budgeted for the Project totaling $251,516 into the Old
Town Sidewalks — Boardwalk Replacement project. Specifically, the following amounts were
reprogramed to the Old Town Sidewalks - Boardwalk Replacement project:
1. From the 2012-13 Program Year - $196,832.25; and
2. From the 2016-17 program year $64,684.
E. On April 6, 2020, the City received a letter from HUD requesting that the City repay
$412,055.75 because the Project, as it was originally designed, contracted and paid for with CDBG
funds was not ultimately constructed. HUD's letter stated that the City will be able to utilize the
$412,055.75 it repays for other CDBG eligible projects.
Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the Finance Department to repay
$412,055.75 from non -Federal funds to the HUD. The repayment will come in the form of
cancelling the Project in the Integrated Disbursement and Information System ("IDIS"), and
providing to HUD documentation that $412,055.75 has been allocated in a local City account for
use on future CDBG eligible projects.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26th day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
PPtt,IENTOF
J IIII IIII tTw
Q
4gPH OEVF
April 6, 2020
Mr. Aaron Adams, City Manager
City of Temecula
ATTN: Luke Watson
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Dear Mr. Adams:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Los Angeles Field Office, Region IX
300 N. Los Angeles Street, Suite 4054
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Subject: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program
Issuance of Finding
Sam Hicks Project
The City of Temecula (City) has indicated to HUD that it cannot complete
Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) activity number 11, the Sam
Hicks Project, as it was originally designed, contracted, and paid for with CDBG funds.
To resolve this, HUD is issuing the finding below and is requesting that the City repay
the $412,055.75 in CDBG funds drawn by the City, from non -Federal funds. It should be
noted that the City will be able to utilize the funds it repays for other CDBG eligible
projects. The City must ensure that it complies with applicable citizen participation
requirements at 24 CFR 91.105 when funding any new project with the repaid funds.
Finding One:
The City cannot complete IDIS activity 11 or ensure that the activity can meet a national
objective.
Condition:
On March 3, 2020 the City of Temecula held a conference call with HUD to discuss IDIS
activity number 11. On the conference call and in subsequent email correspondence to
HUD dated March 20, 2020, the City indicated that it would not be able to complete the
activity as it was originally designed, contracted and paid for with CDBG funds.
Cause:
The City indicated that it was in litigation with its contractor that it hired for the project
and that the City could not complete the activity as it was originally designed and paid for
due to the issues involved in the litigation with the contractor.
Criteri a
24 CFR 570.200(a)(2) — Grantees must ensure and maintain evidence that each of its
activities assisted with CDBG funds meets one of the three national objectives.
2 CFR 200.302(b)(3) — The financial management system of a grantee must ensure that
the grantee maintains records that identify adequately the source and application of funds
for federally -funded activities. These records must contain information pertaining to
Federal awards, authorizations, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, expenditures,
income and interest and be supported by source documentation.
Effect:
Without being able to complete the activity for which the City drew $412,055.75 in
CDBG funds, the City cannot ensure that the activity will meet a national objective.
Grantees must repay funds for any CDBG-funded activity that cannot meet a national
objective.
Corrective Action:
HUD is requesting that the City repay $412,055.75 from non -Federal funds no later May
15, 2020. The repayment is requested to be made by the City using the attached
repayment procedures. By May 15, 2020, the City is also requested to submit financial
documentation showing the repayment to its local account and documentation illustrating
that the City undertook the IDIS steps included in the repayment instructions.
Please respond to this letter in writing no later than 14 calendar days from the date
of this letter. If there are any questions, please contact Michael Kovalsky, Senior
Community Planning and Development Representative at Michael.J.Kovalsky@hud.gov
or (213) 534-2566.
Sincerely,
Rufus Washington, Director
Office of Community Planning
and Development
Enclosure
CDBG Repayment Procedures
Returning funds to the local program account
Grantees must return funds drawn on an ineligible activity or an activity that will not meet a
national objective to their local program account when funds drawn on the activity were from a
CDBG grant that is near or past the eight -year limitation on use of funds. The City must
document the repayment to its local account in its project file and submit this documentation to
HUD.
IDIS Actions When Returning GRANT FUNDS to a Grantee's Local Program Account
Receipt the repayment: The repayment of grant funds to a grantee's local program account is
reported in IDIS through the creation of a receipt to the LA fund. To create a LA receipt, the user
will fill in the Add Receipt screen. Users will indicate that a repayment has been made to their
local account by creating a receipt under the LA fund type. The grantee will associate the
repayment with the activity ID and the specific origin year grant being repaid (year of the grant
from which funds were drawn for the activity — check the vouchers of the IDIS activities to
determine this). The grantee will also report on the re -use or expenditure of the funds by origin
year grant.
The user enters the required fields, including the ID of the activity being repaid, and clicks
the [show activity funds] button. The system displays a table with one row for each Grant
Year and Fund Type from which funds were drawn for the activity.
For each Grant Year and Fund Type, the table shows the drawn amount, any previous LA
repayments, and the remaining balance. The user enters the ReceiptAmount and,
optionally, the Grantee Receipt #. When the receipt is saved, individual receipts, with
distinct receipt numbers, are created for each source.
1) Do NOT revise the vouchers; instead, Cancel the Activity with Draws. When a LA receipt is
created to indicate that CDBG funds expended on an activity have been repaid to a local
account, the grantee will treat the vouchers for that activity as follows: The grantee will
leave vouchers for grant funds (EN, AD, SU, and TA) untouched and request that the activity
be cancelled with draws after required repayments have been paid in full. These vouchers
cannot be cancelled and the grantee shall NOT revise them.
The grantee must submit a request to HUD to cancel the activity. When requesting the
activity to be cancelled with draws, the grantee must provide an explanation for why this
activity can legitimately be cancelled with draws. The grantee should list all the LA receipt
numbers and amounts for the LA funds that have been returned. The grantee must also
include financial documentation showing that the funds have been deposited into the
grantee's local account. All documentation should also be included in the grantee's local
files.
2) By funding and drawing LA funds for new or existing activities, grantees will record in IDIS
how CDBG grant funds repaid to their local account were expended and the
accomplishments that were achieved with them. The LA funds were originally associated
with a specific origin grant year. The re -use of those funds will be associated with that same
origin year grant.
Note: A grantee must disburse LA funds prior to drawing additional CDBG grant funds to pay
for activity -related costs. This may mean that an ongoing activity with a draw request may
need to be funded with LA funds in the amount of the necessary draw. As a consequence,
that activity's grant funding may need to be reduced by the amount of LA funding added. If
a grantee has both LA funds and program income on hand, use program income before LA
funds.
The grantee must submit financial documentation to HUD showing that the funds have been
deposited into the grantee's local account. In addition, the grantee must submit
documentation confirming it carried out the actions above in IDIS. All documentation should
also be included in the grantee's local files.
Item No. 10
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Community Development Director
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve a Loan Agreement with Las Haciendas Housing Associates, LP for a 77
Unit Affordable Housing Project
PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE HOUSING
SUCCESSOR TO THE FORMER TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (AND, WITH RESPECT TO A
LOAN OF CITY FEES, ALSO IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE CITY)
APPROVING A LOAN AGREEMENT WITH LAS HACIENDAS
HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P. FOR THE "LAS HACIENDAS"
77 UNIT LOW INCOME AFFORDABLE MULTI -FAMILY
(APARTMENT) PROJECT AT 28715 LAS HACIENDAS
STREET AND 28772 CALLE CORTEZ, AND THE TAKING OF
RELATED ACTIONS, AND MAKING A FINDING OF
EXEMPTION UNDER CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT SECTION 15182
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community
consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at
28715 Las Haciendas. The Project is 100% affordable and is located in the Uptown Temecula
Specific Plan Area.
BACKGROUND: In 2015, the City as Housing Successor to the Former Redevelopment
Agency obtained clearance from the Department of Finance to spend the remaining Successor
Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency 2017B Series Tax Allocation Refunding Bond
proceeds for their originally intended purpose — for the creation of affordable housing.
As such, staff has met with many developers over the potential development of affordable housing
throughout the community. On August 19, 2019, Community HousingWorks (CHW) submitted a
proposal to the City to develop Las Haciendas, a 77-unit affordable residential community in the
Uptown Temecula on Las Haciendas Street. This project would be the first residential project in
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (UTSP) area. Residential development in the Uptown
Temecula has the potential to be catalytic, providing the necessary residents to support future
development in the area.
On October 8, 2019, the Supportive Housing/Services Subcommittee, consisting of Council
Members Naggar and Rahn, met with the development team from CHW and expressed interest in
moving forward with negotiations of the affordable housing project, with the contribution of
affordable housing funding, deferred development impact fees (DIF), and a reimbursement from
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee Funds for the construction a new
road and alley.
On December 9, 2019, the City provided a Letter of Intent (LOI) to CHW to demonstrate intent
towards a partnership to increase the competitiveness of tax credit applications and establish the
local commitment to the production of affordable housing. The LOI was contingent upon CHW
acquiring two parcels in the UTSP area. CHW closed escrow on these two parcels on December
16, 2019. On February 11, 2020, CHW met again with the Supportive Housing/Services
Subcommittee to provide an update on the entitlement process and project.
Affordability
The Project consists seventy-six affordable units that will be affordable to extremely low, very
low, and low-income households, plus one manager's unit. The Project is located in the Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ) that was adopted by City Council in 2018. The development of
the affordable units will assist in the City in meeting our Regional Housing Needs Assessment
(RHNA) goals, as defined by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
Because of the City's financial assistance, the Project must comply with the obligations of SB 341,
which stipulates that the City, as Housing Successor to the Redevelopment Agency, must target
its expenditures of affordable housing funds as follows:
• At least 30% of the funds must be spent for the development of housing for extremely low
income households earning 30% or less of the area median income (AMI)
• No more than 20% of the funds may be spent for the development of housing affordable
for households earning between 60% and 80% of the AMI
• The balance of the funds may be spent for the development of housing affordable for
households earning 60% or less of the AMI
CHW, who created a new operating entity, Las Haciendas Housing Associates for the Project,
plans to apply to the State of California for 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC).
Seventy-six of the units will be restricted per LIHTC requirements. The Developer has proposed
an affordability mix competitive for an LIHTC application, as demonstrated in the following chart:
Area Median Income Tax Credit CA Redevelopment Law
Regulatory Agreement Regulatory Agreement
Extremely Low (30% AMI) 24 12
Very Low (50% AMI) 8 18
Low Income (60% AMI) 44 7
Total Restricted Units
76
37
Per the Loan Agreement, thirty-seven of those units will be further restricted per California
Redevelopment Law (CRL) and the Developer will be required to comply with CRL requirements
when determining household income and affordable rent calculations. The term of affordability is
fifty-five years for all units.
City Financial Contribution
The financing of Las Haciendas Apartments will involve the following sources:
Source of Funds
Amount
Deferred Developer Fee
$85,000
General Partner Equity Contribution
$194,000
Utility Deposit Refunds
$199,000
Las Haciendas Housing Associates
$3,585,000
City of Temecula as Housing Successor to the
$10,130,000
RDA
California Tax Credit Allocation Committee
$23,361,000
Total Development Costs $37,554,000
The Loan Agreement proposes that the City contribute a total of $10,130,000 toward the Project,
in the form of two residual receipt loans and one reimbursement as follows:
Description Amount
Deferred Fee Loan
Capital Loan
$718,445
•=
UTSP In Lieu Fee Reimbursement $500,857
Total City Contribution $10,130,000
The Deferred Fee Loan of $718,445 consists of deferred Development Impact Fees (DIF), Quimby
fees, permit fees, Public Works fees, and Fire fees for the Project, locked in at 2019-20 amounts.
The Capital Loan of $8,910,698 is from the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment
Agency 2017B Series Tax Allocation Refunding Bond proceeds.
The City loans will bear an annual interest rate of three percent, commencing on the date of
disbursement. The City will receive fifty percent of residual receipts toward the repayment of City
loans. Payments will be made first to pay down the Deferred Fee Loan.
The UTSP New Streets In -Lieu Fee Reimbursement will be approximately $500,857. The actual
reimbursement will be determined based on the costs of the completion of the new road connecting
Las Haciendas and Calle Cortez, but will be no more than 1.75% of the total land acquisition and
hard costs of the Project.
Development and Construction Timeline
As outlined in Exhibit H to the Loan Agreement, the Developer is obligated to meet certain
deadlines associated the construction of the Project:
• The Developer will secure entitlements from the City by July 1, 2020, in order to apply
for State of California 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC)
• The Developer will have until December 2022 to apply to, and secure from LIHTC,
and must apply at every opportunity.
• If the Developer is not successful in securing 9% tax credits, the Developer will have
the option to apply to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee for a tax-exempt
bond to combine this source with 4% LIHTC and pursue other sources of funds.
• The close of City Loan shall occur within one month after the award of tax credits, but
no later than December 31, 2022.
• Construction shall commence thirty days after the close of the City Loan and completed
no later than eighteen calendar months after the commencement of construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION: This Loan Agreement was analyzed in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines. Staff has determined that the proposed Loan Agreement is exempt from the
requirements of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines 15162 and 15182. On November 17,
2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH#2013061012) was certified in connection with
the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is
divided into six planning districts, all of which allow residential uses. The Uptown Temecula
Specific Plan does not contain maximum or minimum density requirements, although residential
development is anticipated at a range of 20 to 60 dwelling units per acre. For planning purposes,
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan assumes a residential density of 45 dwelling units per acre in
all zoning districts. The proposed project that is the subject matter of the Loan Agreement
proposes to construct 77 units on 2.5 acres, which is under the 45 dwelling units per acre analyzed
by the EIR. As such, the environmental impacts for the project have been evaluated by the
previously adopted EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no further environmental
review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 exist to
require any additional environmental review and no further documentation is necessary. In
addition, staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Uptown
Temecula Specific Plan. The City Council has reviewed staff s determination of exemption and,
based on its own independent judgment, concurs in staffs determination that the proposed Loan
Agreement is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 and that no
further environmental review is needed pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Staff is
directed to prepare a Notice of Exemption.
FISCAL IMPACT: As discussed above, the Loan Agreement proposes that the
City contribute a total of $10,130,000 toward the Project, in the form of two residual receipt loans
and one reimbursement as follows:
Description
Deferred Fee Loan
Capital Loan
UTSP In Lieu Fee Reimbursement
ITotal City Contribution
Amount
$718,445
$8,910,698
$500,857
$10,130,000
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution
2. Attachment A to the Resolution: Loan Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE
HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE FORMER TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (AND, WITH RESPECT TO
A LOAN OF CITY FEES, ALSO IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE
CITY) APPROVING A LOAN AGREEMENT WITH LAS
HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P. FOR THE "LAS
HACIENDAS" 77 UNIT LOW INCOME AFFORDABLE
MULTI -FAMILY (APARTMENT) PROJECT AT 28715 LAS
HACIENDAS STREET AND 28772 CALLE CORTEZ, AND
THE TAKING OF RELATED ACTIONS, AND MAKING A
FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT SECTION 15182
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City") hereby
finds, determines and declares that:
(a) The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula (the "Former Agency") was
a duly constituted redevelopment agency pursuant to provisions of the Community Redevelopment
Law (the "Redevelopment Law") set forth in Section 33000 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code
("HSC") of the State of California (the "State").
(b) Under the Redevelopment Law, the Former Agency was authorized, among other
things, to provide assistance to the development of affordable housing projects.
(c) Pursuant to AB X1 26 (which became effective in June 2011), and the California
Supreme Court's decision in California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et
al., 53 Cal. 4th 231 (2011), the Former Agency was dissolved as of February 1, 2012, and the
Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (the "Successor Agency") was
constituted as the successor entity to the Former Agency.
(d) Pursuant to HSC Section 34175(b), all assets of the Former Agency, including so-
called low income housing set aside funds, transferred to the Successor Agency by operation of
law; provided, that pursuant to HSC Section 34176 and Resolution No. 12-11, adopted by the City
Council on January 24, 2012, the City elected to assume the housing functions of the Former
Agency (in such capacity, the "Housing Successor").
(e) Las Haciendas Housing Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership
("Developer") desires to obtain a construction loan from the City of low income set aside funds in
the amount of $8,910,698 and a loan/deferment of $718,445 of development fees in order to
facilitate construction of a 77-unit multifamily apartment complex to be known as "Las Haciendas"
(the "Project").
(f) Developer desires to enter into a Loan Agreement with the City ("Loan
Agreement") to provide for the terms and conditions of the City loans. The form of the Loan
Agreement negotiated by staff is attached hereto as Attachment A and includes the forms of a
promissory note, a subordinate deed of trust, and a regulatory agreement restricting 49% of the
units to affordable low income housing for 55 years (with the other units, except for a manager's
unit, to be restricted by a regulatory agreement required in conjunction with the tax credits);
(g) Developer will be seeking an allocation of low-income housing tax credits and is
also contemplating a financing transaction from a third party lender to help finance the
construction of the Project.
Section 2. Approval of Agreement. The Loan Agreement, in the form set forth in
Attachment A, is hereby approved. The Mayor (or in the Mayor's absence, the Mayor Pro Tem)
and the City Manager (each, an "Authorized Officer"), acting individually, are hereby authorized
to execute and deliver the Loan Agreement, for the City as the Housing Successor and the City as
a city, in substantially such form, with changes therein as the Authorized Officer executing the
same may approve (such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery
thereof).
Section 3. Other Acts. The Authorized Officers and all other officers of the City are
hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things, including the execution and delivery of
documents and instruments, which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes
of this Resolution, the Loan Agreement, and all documents contemplated or required by the Loan
Agreement. The City Clerk is authorized to attest to the City officers' signatures to any such
document or instrument.
Section 4. CEOA Exemption Findings. This Loan Agreement was analyzed in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the State CEQA
Guidelines, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines. Staff has determined that the proposed Loan
Agreement is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines 15162
and 15182. On November 17, 2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH#2013061012)
was certified in connection with the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The Uptown
Temecula Specific Plan is divided into six planning districts, all of which allow residential uses.
The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan does not contain maximum or minimum density
requirements, although residential development is anticipated at a range of 20 to 60 dwelling units
per acre. For planning purposes, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan assumes a residential density
of 45 dwelling units per acre in all zoning districts. The proposed project that is the subject matter
of the Loan Agreement proposes to construct 77 units on 2.5 acres, which is under the 45 dwelling
units per acre analyzed by the EIR. As such, the environmental impacts for the project have been
evaluated by the previously adopted EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no further
environmental review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation is necessary.
In addition, staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The City Council has reviewed staff s determination of
exemption and, based on its own independent judgment, concurs in staff s determination that the
proposed Loan Agreement is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections
N
15182 and that no further environmental review is needed pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15162. Staff is directed to prepare a Notice of Exemption.
Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26th day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT A
Form of Loan Agreement
(Attached.)
DRAFT
LOAN AGREEMENT
THIS LOAN AGREEMENT "Loan Agreement") is dated as of May 26, 2020 and is
entered into by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, as successor to the housing assets and
funds of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency ("City"), and LAS HACIENDAS
HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Borrower").
RECITALS:
A. Borrower has acquired the land located in the City of Temecula, County of
Riverside, State of California, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto
(together with any improvements thereon, the "Property").
B. Borrower intends to construct the improvements on the land that are described on
Exhibit "B" (the "Improvements" and together with the Property, the "Development").
C. City has agreed to provide a loan to Borrower to pay for City's impact
development fees in the principal amount of $718,445 and a construction loan of former
Temecula Redevelopment Agency low -mod housing set aside funds in a principal amount not to
exceed $8,910,698 (collectively, the "Loan"), the construction loan portion of which shall be
disbursed in accordance with Section 3.7 of this Loan Agreement and the deferred fee portion of
which shall be deemed outstanding on the closing of the Loan (as a loan by the City of such fees;
in other words, the City will not pay itself those fees from low -mod set aside funds or general
funds at the closing, but will defer those fees, with interest, which is in essence a loan).
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT:
1. DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS.
1.1. Definitions. The following initially capitalized words and terms have the
meanings set forth in this Section 1.1 wherever used in this Agreement, unless otherwise
provided to the contrary:
1.1.1. "Closing" shall mean the date on which the Deed of
Trust is recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County, California.
1.1.2. "Completion of Construction" shall mean the date
that Borrower obtains a temporary or final certificate of occupancy for the
Improvements evidencing that the construction of the Improvement is complete except
for certain punch list items.
1.1.3. "Construction Plans" means the construction plans,
specifications and related documents consistent with the Scope of Development
attached hereto as Exhibit `B" for the design and construction of the Improvements.
1.1.4. "Deed of Trust" shall mean a Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing in the form attached
-1-
hereto as Exhibit "C", executed by Borrower for the benefit of City and,
acknowledged (which is to be recorded against the Property in the Official Records of
Riverside County, California at the Closing) encumbering the Development.
1.1.5. "Developer" shall mean Community
HousingWorks, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation.
1.1.6. "Entitlements" shall mean all authorizations,
approvals, rights, maps, licenses, permits, franchises, certificates, instruments,
documents, agreements, variances and other land use approvals required for the
Development.
1.1.7. "Governmental Authority" shall mean any federal,
state or local governments, and all subdivision thereof, including any City, authority,
board, bureau, commission, department or other public body, including any court,
administrative tribunal or public utility.
1.1.8. "Gross Revenues" means the sum of. the total
rental income and all other revenues or income received by the Borrower or its
successors or assigns in connection with the Project, including without limitation
Housing Rent, laundry charges or consideration received from an entity that contracts
to provide laundry services, payments in connection with Section 8 certificates, if any
(including payments under such certificates that are in excess of the restricted rents
provided for herein), cable income or consideration received from an entity that
contracts to provide cable services, each of (i) amounts paid to Borrower or any
affiliated person on account of Operating Expenses for further disbursement by
Borrower or such affiliate to a third party or parties, including, without limitation,
grants received to fund social services or other housing supportive services at the
Project; (ii) late charges and interest paid on rentals; (iii) rents and receipts from
licenses, concessions, vending machines, coin laundry, and similar sources; (iv) other
fees, charges, or payments not denominated as rental but payable to Borrower in
connection with the rental of office, retail, storage, or other space in the Project;
(v) consideration received in whole or in part for the cancellation, modification,
extension or renewal of leases; (vi) interest and other investment earnings on security
deposits, reserve accounts and other Project accounts to the extent disbursed, and
(vii) all other income from the Project, but does not include insurance proceeds
applied to reconstruct or repair the Project.
1.1.9. "Housing Rent" means the total of payments by the
tenants of the Project for (a) use and occupancy of their rental unit and facilities
associated therewith, (b) any separately charged fees or service charges assessed by
Borrower which are required of all tenants, other than security deposits (until they are
applied), (c) a reasonable allowance for utilities not included in (a) or (b) above,
including garbage collection, sewer, water, electricity and gas, provided that the rent
charged as to any affordable unit shall not exceed the affordable rent described in the
Regulatory Agreement.
1.1.10. "Improvements" or "Project" shall mean the work
described in the Scope of Development attached hereto as Exhibit `B".
-2-
1.1.11. "Loan" or "City Loan" shall mean the loans by the
City contemplated by this Agreement.
1.1.12. "Loan Documents" shall mean this Agreement, the
Note, the Deed of Trust, the Regulatory Agreement and all other documents and
instruments executed and delivered, or to be executed and delivered, in connection
with the Loan.
1.1.13. "Note" shall mean a Promissory Note Secured by
Deed of Trust, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "D", executed by Borrower and
payable to City.
1.1.14. "Notice" shall mean a Notice of Affordability
Restrictions in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "E".
1.1.15. "Operating Expenses" means actual, reasonable and
customary costs, fees and expenses directly incurred and for which payment has been
made and which are attributable to the operation, maintenance, and management of the
Project, including without limitation the following (to the extent actual, reasonable and
customary, and attributable to the operation, maintenance or management of the
Project): painting, cleaning, repairs and alterations; landscaping; utilities; rubbish
removal; sewer charges; real and personal property taxes and assessments; insurance
premiums; security; advertising, promotion and publicity; office, janitorial, cleaning
and building supplies; actual and customary salary payable to an on -site manager
which directly and exclusively benefits residents of the Project; a management fee
("Management Fee") to a third party property manager, not to exceed $48 per month
per unit commencing in the year the Closing occurs, which Management Fee shall
increase 2.5% annually; purchase, repairs, servicing and installation of appliances,
equipment, fixtures and furnishings; reasonable and customary fees and expenses of
accountants, attorneys, consultants and other professionals as incurred commencing
after the Completion of Construction in connection with the operation of the Project;
payments of deductibles in connection with casualty insurance claims not normally
paid from reserves; and payment of any tax credit adjuster payments, general partner
management fee in an amount not to exceed $15,000 per year commencing in the year
of Closing, which fee shall increase at 3% annually, resident services fee in an amount
not to exceed $48,000 per year commencing in the year of Closing, which fee may
accrue to the extent not paid and shall increase at 3% annually, asset management fee
payable to the limited partners of Borrower in the aggregate amount not to exceed
$7,500 per year, which fee shall increase at 3% annually and deferred developer fees.
Operating Expenses shall not include non -cash expenses, including without limitation,
depreciation. Operating Expenses shall also exclude all of the following: (i) salaries
of employees of Borrower or Developer or Borrower's or Developer's general
overhead expenses, or expenses, costs and fees paid to any affiliated person or entity;
(ii) any amounts paid directly by a tenant of the Project which, if incurred by
Developer or Borrower, would be any Operating Expenses; (iii) any payments with
respect to any loan or financing; (iv) expenses, expenditures, and charges of any nature
whatsoever arising or incurred by Borrower or Developer prior to completion of the
Project, or any portion thereof, including, without limitation, all predevelopment and
preconstruction activities conducted by Borrower or Developer in connection with the
-3-
Project, including, without limitation, the preparation of all plans and the performance
of any tests, studies, investigations or other work, and the construction of the Project
and any on site or off site work in connection therewith; (v) depreciation, amortization,
and accrued principal and interest expense on deferred debt; and (vi) any partnership
internal fees except as set forth above. The Operating Expenses shall be reported in
the Annual Financial Statement and Residual Receipts Report and shall be broken out
in line -item detail.
1.1.16. "Operating Year" shall mean January 1st to
December 3 Vt of each calendar year.
1.1.17. "Parties" shall mean City, Borrower or Developer,
collectively.
1.1.18. "Party" shall mean City, Borrower or Developer,
individually.
1.1.19. "Person" shall mean a natural person, a partnership,
a joint venture, an unincorporated association, a limited liability company, a
corporation, a trust, any other business association or any Governmental Authority.
1.1.20. "Potential Default" shall mean any condition or
event that could, with the lapse of time after Borrower receives notice thereof from
City, constitute a "Default" (as defined in Section 5.1 below).
1.1.21. "Property" shall have the meaning provided in
Recital A, but shall also mean portions thereof or interests therein as the context
requires.
1.1.22. "Preliminary Budget" shall mean the budget for the
costs of the Project attached hereto as Exhibit "F".
1.1.23. "Regulatory Agreement" shall mean the
Affordability Restrictions and Regulatory Agreement in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit "G".
1.1.24. "Residual Receipts" for a particular Operating Year
means Gross Revenues for the corresponding Operating Year less (i) debt service
payments made during such Operating Year on the Senior Project Loan in amounts not
in excess of the amounts due and payable during such Operating Year (i.e. not
including prepayments); (ii) to the extent applicable, issuer's fee payable to the issuer
of tax exempt multifamily bonds used to finance the Development, and (ii) Operating
Expenses. All calculations of Residual Receipts shall be made annually, on or before
April 30 for the preceding Operating Year, on a cash (and not accrual) basis and the
components thereof shall be subject to verification and approval, on an annual basis,
by City.
1.1.25. "Schedule of Performance" shall mean the
schedule for the completion of the Improvements attached to this Agreement as
Exhibit "H".
ME
1.1.26. "Senior Project Loan" shall mean the construction
loan obtained by Borrower from a third party lender for the construction of the Project,
and any refinancing loan used to repay such construction loan or any refinancing
thereof, but the amount of any such refinancing may not exceed the outstanding
principal of the loan being refinanced, plus prepayment charges, loan fees and closing
costs payable by Borrower.
1.2. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and
incorporated into, and made a part of, this Agreement by this reference:
1.2.1. Exhibit "A": Legal Description
1.2.2
1.2.3
1.2.4
1.2.5
Restrictions
1.2.6.
[INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]
1.2.7
and Regulatory Agreement
1.2.8
Exhibit `B": Scope of Development
Exhibit "C": Form of Deed of Trust
Exhibit "D": Form of Promissory Note
Exhibit "E": Form of Notice of Affordability
Exhibit "F": Preliminary Project Budget
Exhibit "G": Form of Affordability Restrictions
Exhibit "H": Schedule of Performance
2. CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS
2.1. Construction Pursuant to Plans. The Improvements shall be constructed in
accordance with final Construction Plans approved by the City and the terms and conditions of
the permits and approvals issued or to be issued by the City.
2.2. Commencement and Completion of Improvements; Schedule of
Performance. Borrower shall commence construction of the Improvements no later than the
applicable date set forth in the Schedule of Performance, diligently prosecute to completion the
construction of the Improvements no later than the applicable date set forth in the Schedule of
Performance, and Developer shall otherwise comply with the Schedule of Performance, in each
case subject to Section 6.11 below (Force Majeure).
2.3. Compliance with Applicable Law. Borrower shall cause all construction
to be performed in compliance with: (a) all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of
federal, state, county or municipal governments or agencies now in force or that may be enacted
hereafter; (b) all directions, rules and regulations of any fire marshal, health officer, building
inspector, or other officer of every governmental City now having or hereafter acquiring
jurisdiction; (c) all applicable permits and governmental approvals.
-5-
2.4. Monthly Draw. Until such time as Borrower has completed the
Improvements, Borrower shall provide City with a copy of the monthly construction draw (by
the fifteenth day of each month) which Borrower is submitting to its senior construction lender
or its tax credit investor, as applicable.
2.5. Construction Responsibilities. Borrower shall be solely responsible for all
aspects of Borrower's conduct in connection with the Improvements, including (but not limited
to) the quality and suitability of the plans and specifications, the supervision of construction
work, and the qualifications, financial condition, and performance of all architects, engineers,
contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, consultants, and property managers. Any review or
inspection undertaken by City with reference to the Improvements is solely for the purpose of
determining whether Borrower is properly discharging its obligations, and should not be relied
upon by Borrower or by any third parties as a warranty or representation as to the quality of the
design or construction of the Improvements, or for any other purpose.
2.6. Mechanics Liens, Stop Notices, and Notices of Completion. If any claim
of lien is filed against the Property or a stop notice with respect to the Loan is served on City or
any other lender or other third party in connection with the Improvements, then Borrower shall,
subject to Borrower's right to contest such lien in good faith and in accordance with applicable
law, within ninety (90) days after such filing or service, either pay and fully discharge the lien or
stop notice, effect the release of such lien or stop notice by delivering to City a surety bond from
a surety acceptable to City in sufficient form and amount, or provide City with other assurance
satisfactory to City that the claim of lien or stop notice will be paid or discharged.
2.7. Budget Amendments. After the Closing, Borrower shall submit to City
any material changes to the Project Budget (which will have been delivered to City as a
condition to Closing) for reasonable approval by the City Manager within ten (10) days after
Borrower receives information indicating that actual costs therein vary or will vary from those
shown on the Project Budget, together with evidence that Borrower has funds available from
sources to pay any cost increases and overruns.
2.8. Performance and Payment Bonds. Prior to the Closing, Borrower shall
deliver to Lender copies of performance and payment bonds to assure completion of the Project,
or a letter of credit acceptable in form and substance to Lender from an issuer acceptable to
Lender, in an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Borrower's stipulated sum
or GMAX construction contract.
2.9 Limited Reimbursement by City. Upon completion of the new road
connecting Las Haciendas and Calle Cortez, which may occur at any time prior to the issuance
Certificate of Occupancy, and City's acceptance of such road, Borrower may request City's
reimbursement of the costs incurred by Borrower in connection with the construction such road
for an amount up to a maximum of the lesser o£ (i) one and three quarters percent (1.75%) of the
total land acquisition and hard costs of the Project (excluding such road costs) or (ii) the amount
of such road costs. However, provided Borrower is not in default under this Agreement,
Borrower may request and City shall provide such reimbursement in two phases: (i) the first
disbursement shall be made upon completion of the rough improvements including: rough and
finish grading, curb and gutter, apron and approach installations, and initial base course of
asphalt; and (ii) the second disbursement shall be made at end of the completion of the street
improvements, which shall include, without limitation: public sidewalks, final courses and
in
sealing of asphalt, and striping, paint and signage and when the City authorizes reduction in the
subdivision improvement bond for such improvements (each of such two reimbursement
payments being limited to the amount of documented costs then incurred, and being further
limited by the first sentence of this Section). Concurrent with Borrower's requests for
reimbursement, Borrower shall deliver to City reasonable evidence of the out-of-pocket
construction costs incurred by Borrower for which reimbursement is requested.
3. LOAN PROVISIONS.
3.1. Use. The Loan shall be used solely for costs of the Project as shown on
the Project Budget that exceed the equity available for and invested in the Project (and all of
such equity funds must be expended on project costs prior to disbursement of the Loan).
3.2. Interest; Payments. The outstanding principal balance of the Loan shall
accrue interest as set forth in the Note and shall be payable as set forth in the Note.
3.3. Acceleration. Upon a Default by Borrower under Section 5 below, City
may elect by written notice to Borrower that all outstanding principal and accrued interest on the
Loan shall become due and payable.
3.4. Security; Subordination. The Note shall be secured by the Deed of Trust.
The City Manager shall have the authority to enter into reasonable, recordable subordination
agreements subordinating the Deed of Trust to the deed of trust securing any Senior Project Loan
if necessary for Borrower to obtain the applicable Senior Project Loan.
3.5. Residual Receipts Reporting. On or before April 30 of each calendar year
after the Project is placed in service, Borrower shall provide the City with an annual Residual
Receipts report in form and substance reasonably acceptable to City that include annual financial
statements with respect to the Project that have been reviewed by an independent certified public
accountant, together with an express written opinion of such independent certified public
accountant that such report presents the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of
the Project accurately and in accordance with tax accounting principles ("Annual Financial
Report"). If the Residual Receipts reported or paid deviate by three percent (3%) or more from
that amount determined to be owing upon review of Borrower's submittal and an audit (and the
City shall have the right to audit), Borrower shall reimburse City for City's cost to review and
audit costs and shall pay the amounts owing within ten (10) days after written notice from City
describing such costs. Borrower shall keep all Residual Receipts records at a location in the
County of Riverside.
3.6. Conditions Precedent to Closing. The obligation of City to close the City
Loan is expressly conditioned upon the satisfaction of the following on or before December 31,
2022:
Borrower;
3.6.1. City's receipt of this Agreement and the Note, duly executed by
3.6.2. No Default or Potential Default by Borrower exists.
3.6.3. Stewart Title Insurance Company has recorded, or is irrevocably
and unconditionally committed to record, the Deed of Trust and the Regulatory Agreement.
-7-
3.6.4. Stewart Title Insurance Company has unconditionally committed
to issue a lender's title insurance policy to City in the amount of the City Loan insuring the Deed
of Trust, with exceptions approved by City and otherwise in form and substance acceptable to
City (which may show the deed of trust securing the Senior Project Loan as an exception).
3.6.5. Borrower shall have delivered to City copies of Borrower's
organizational documents to City (including the partnership agreement for any tax credit limited
partnership formed by the Borrower) as well as any other reasonable evidence requested by City
showing City that Borrower has duly authorized the Loan Documents.
3.6.6. City shall have issued the building permits or permit ready letter
for the improvements and shall have completed environmental (CEQA) review.
3.6.7. Borrower shall have provided to the City: (i) a GMAX or
stipulated sum construction contract from a reputable bondable contractor consistent with the
comprehensive Project Budget and Schedule of Performance; (ii) a comprehensive Project
Budget for the costs of the Project; (iii) a schedule of construction and permanent sources and
uses of funds; and (ii) reasonable evidence that Borrower (i.e., the tax credit limited partnership)
has equity funds to pay for such costs (and that any tax credit equity shall have been obtained
and committed to the Project).
3.6.8. The Senior Project Loan shall have closed, and the Senior Project
Lender shall have executed and delivered the Disbursement Agreement, in form acceptable to the
City Manager, to the City (or such Disbursement Agreement may be delivered through escrow at
the Closing).
3.7. Loan Disbursements; Retainage. Disbursements the Loan shall occur and
be conditioned upon the following:
(i) City shall fund the full amount of the Loan at Closing into a bank
account held by the Senior Project Lender pursuant to a Disbursement Agreement
between City and the Senior Project Lender that is approved and signed by the
City Manager;
(ii) Borrower may draw on the Loan funds after all of Borrower's
equity that is to be used for construction costs shall have been so used, but prior to
Borrower's draw on the construction loan provided by the Senior Lender (and
prior to equity funds provided by Borrower's tax credit limited partner that are not
to be invested until the construction loan is repaid or converted to a permanent
loan), provided, Borrower (or Senior Project Lender acting under the
Disbursement Agreement) shall have delivered to City a written disbursement
request signed by Borrower, together with copies of the applicable invoices or
other appropriate documentation for the costs to be paid and appropriate
mechanics lien waivers for the work performed prior to the date of disbursement
(i.e., unconditional progress payment waivers for all costs paid with the previous
disbursement, and conditional progress payment waivers for the costs to be paid
with the current disbursement, provided that final waivers shall be provided as a
condition to the final disbursement), and any other documentation required by the
53
Senior Project Lender as a condition to disbursements of City Loan funds under
the Disbursement Agreement.
(iii) No default shall have occurred under any Loan Document that
remains uncured as of the date of the disbursement request or disbursement.
Except for early subcontractor work including grading, soil improvements, road
improvements, and structural concrete, City may (and the Senior Project Lender under the
Disbursement Agreement handling City Loan funds shall) retain ten percent (10%) of any
disbursement requested for hard costs, and shall not be obligated to disburse the ten percent
(10%) until the Project has been completed and a Certificate of Occupancy for the Project is
issued, and the Borrower has delivered final mechanic's lien releases conditioned only upon such
final payment.
4. OTHER LOAN REQUIREMENTS.
4.1. Information. Borrower shall provide any information requested by City in
good faith in connection with the Improvements.
4.2. Hazardous Materials. Borrower shall not use, generate, manufacture, store
or dispose of on, under, or about the Property or transport to or from the Property any flammable
explosives, radioactive materials, hazardous wastes, toxic substances or related materials,
including any substances defined as or included in the definition of "hazardous substances,"
hazardous wastes," "hazardous materials," or "toxic substances" under any applicable federal or
state laws or regulations (collectively, "Hazardous Materials"), except such of the foregoing as
may be customarily used in connection with the ownership, operation, occupancy, maintenance
and construction of improvements similar to the Improvements. Borrower acknowledges and
agrees that each representation and warranty in this Agreement (together with any indemnity
obligation applicable to a breach of any such representation and warranty) with respect to the
environmental condition of the Property is intended by the Parties to be an "environmental
provision" for purposes of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 736.
4.3. Construction Responsibilities; Commencement and Completion.
Borrower shall cause the construction of the Improvements to be prosecuted with diligence, in
good faith, and in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, subject to Section 6.11 below.
Borrower shall cause the construction of the Improvements to be performed in a good and
workmanlike manner in accordance with the Construction Plans approved by the City, in
compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, building restrictions,
recorded covenants and restrictions and requirements of each Governmental Authority having
jurisdiction over the Property and free and clear of any liens or claims for liens. Borrower shall
be solely responsible for all aspects of Borrower's business and conduct in connection with the
Property, including the quality and suitability of the Construction Plans and their compliance
with the requirements of each applicable Governmental Authority and the Loan Documents, and
the supervision of the construction of the Improvements, the qualifications, financial condition
and performance of all architects, engineers, contractors, subcontractors, material suppliers,
consultants and property managers, the accuracy of all applications for payment and loan draw
requests and the proper application of all disbursements.
11
4.4. Fees and Taxes. Borrower shall be solely responsible for payment of all
fees, assessments, taxes, charges and levies imposed by any public authority or utility company
with respect to the Property, and shall pay such charges prior to delinquency. However,
Borrower shall not be required to pay and discharge any such charge so long as (a) the legality
thereof is being contested diligently and in good faith and by appropriate proceedings and (b) if
requested by City, Borrower deposits with City such funds or other forms of assurance that City
in good faith from time to time determines appropriate to protect City from the consequences of
the contest being unsuccessful.
4.5. Notice of Litigation. Borrower shall promptly notify City of any litigation
materially affecting Borrower or the Property and of any claims or disputes that involve a
material risk of any such litigation.
4.6. Transfers. The qualifications and identity of the Borrower are of
particular concern to the City and it is because of such qualifications and identity that the City
has entered into this Agreement with the Borrower. No voluntary or involuntary successor in
interest of the Borrower shall acquire any rights or powers under this Agreement except as
expressly set forth herein. Provided, however, should City approves the limited partnership
agreement of Borrower (such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld), the following
transfers shall be permitted: (A) the removal of the General Partner for cause and in accordance
with the terms of the limited partnership agreement of Borrower, provided (i) Borrower shall
provide City with at least 30 days prior written notice of such removal (except in the event of a
removal due to an event of emergency), and (ii) that the identity and qualifications of any
replacement general partner is approved in writing by City prior to the consummation of the
removal of the General Partner (except in the event of a removal due to an event of emergency,
in which case City shall be provided with written notice within five (5) business days of the
removal, setting forth the identity and qualification of the replacement, (B) the transfer of the
limited partner's interest in Borrower and (C) the transfer of any direct or indirect interests in the
limited partner of Borrower. Except for a transfer that is permitted hereunder, the Loan may be
accelerated by City if there is any conveyance by Borrower of the Property or any portion
thereof or interest therein, or Developer ceases to be (or ceases to own and control, as applicable)
the sole member and manager of the general partner of the Borrower prior to the completion of
the Improvements without the City's prior written consent in its sole and absolute discretion.
4.7. Insurance Indemnity.
4.7.1. Insurance.
4.7.1.1 Developer shall obtain and maintain at no cost or expense
to the City, with a reputable and financially responsible insurance company reasonably
acceptable to the City, (i) after the opening of the Project for business, commercially reasonable
casualty insurance for the Improvements in an amount not less than the replacement cost of the
Improvements (subject to commercially reasonable deductibles); (ii) commercial general liability
insurance, insuring against claims and liability for bodily injury, death, or property damage
arising from the construction, use, occupancy, condition, or operation of the Land, which liability
insurance shall provide combined single limit protection of at least $2,000,000, contractual
liability coverage and products and completed operations coverage, and (iii) commercial
automobile liability insurance of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit. Such liability
-10-
insurance policies shall name the City and their council members, board members, officers,
agents and employees as additional insureds.
4.7.1.2 Upon the commencement of any construction work by
Developer, Developer shall obtain and maintain in force until completion of such work (i)
builder's risk insurance, including coverage for vandalism and malicious mischief, in a form and
amount and with a company reasonably acceptable to the City, and (ii) workers' compensation
insurance covering all persons employed by Developer in connection with work on the Project,
or any portion thereof. During the construction of Improvements on any portion of the Land by
Developer, such builder's risk insurance shall cover improvements in place and all material and
equipment at the job site furnished under contract, but shall exclude contractors',
subcontractors', and construction managers' tools and equipment and property owned by
contractors' and subcontractors' employees.
4.7.1.3 Each architect and each engineer providing work in excess
of $100,000 in costs engaged by Developer shall provide professional liability insurance with a
limit of liability of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00).
4.7.1.4 Developer shall also furnish or cause to be furnished to
the City evidence satisfactory to the City that any contractor with whom it has contracted for the
performance of work on the Land or otherwise pursuant to this Agreement carries workers'
compensation insurance as required by law.
4.7.1.5 With respect to each policy of insurance required above,
Developer and each of Developer's general contractors, engineers and architects shall furnish to
the City a certificate on the insurance carrier's form setting forth the general provisions of the
insurance coverage promptly after written request by City showing the additional insureds. The
certificate shall also be furnished by Developer prior to commencement of construction of any
Improvements.
4.7.1.6 All such policies required by this Section shall contain
(i) language to the effect that the policies cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after
thirty (30) days' written notice by the insurer to the City, and (ii) a waiver of the insurer of all
rights of subrogation against the City and the other additional insureds.
4.7.17 Procuring the insurance required under this Section shall
not be construed to limit Borrower's liability under the Loan Documents, or to fulfill its
indemnity obligations under the Loan Documents. Notwithstanding such insurance policies,
Borrower shall be responsible for the total amount of any damage, injury or loss caused by
Borrower's negligence connected with the ownership, operation or occupancy of the
improvements on the land. The insurance requirements set forth in this Section are for the sole
purpose of protecting City's security for the Loan and are not to be construed as a representation
by City that the insurance required under this Section is sufficient to cover Borrower from or
against all uninsured losses and Borrower releases City from any liability and forever waives any
claims against City in connection therewith.
4.7.18 All insurance policies shall (a) be issued by an insurance
company having a rating of "A:VII" or better by A.M. Best Co., in Best's Rating Guide;
(b) name City as an additional insured on all liability insurance and as mortgagee and loss payee
-11-
on all property insurance, (c) contain the "standard non-contributory mortgagee clause" and the
"standard lenders' loss payable clause," or their equivalents, (d) not be modified or canceled
without thirty (30) days' prior written notice to City, and (e) be evidenced by a certificate of
insurance or, if required by City, certified policy to be delivered to City.
4.8. Indemnity. From and after the execution of this Agreement, and in
addition to Developer's obligations under Section 6.4 below, Developer hereby agrees to
indemnify, defend, protect, and hold harmless the City (as a third party beneficiary) and any and
all agents, employees, representatives, council members, board members, consultants, and
officers of the City, from and against all losses, liabilities, claims, damages (including
foreseeable or unforeseeable consequential damages), penalties, fines, forfeitures, costs and
expenses (including all reasonable out of pocket litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees)
and demands of any nature whatsoever, related directly or indirectly to, or arising out of or in
connection with:
(i) the development and construction by Developer of the
Improvements on the land or the use, ownership, management,
occupancy, or possession of the land during Developer's period of
ownership of the land;
(ii) any breach or Default by Developer hereunder; and
(iii) any of Developer's activities on the land (or the activities of
Developer's agents, employees, lessees, representatives, licensees, guests,
invitees, contractors, subcontractors, or independent contractors on the land).
The City may in its discretion, and at their own cost, participate in the defense of
any legal action naming the City. The provisions of this Section shall survive the Closing or the
termination of this Agreement.
5. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES.
5.1. Events of Default. Each of the following shall constitute a "Default" by
Borrower under this Agreement:
5.1.1. The failure by Borrower to make a payment of money to City
within five (5) business days from the date such payment was due under any of the Loan
Documents.
5.1.2. The failure by Borrower to perform any obligation under the Loan
Documents not involving the payment of money, and, if such failure is curable within thirty (30)
days, the expiration of thirty (30) days after notice of such failure from City to Borrower. If such
failure is not curable within 30 days, Borrower may have such longer period of time as is
reasonably necessary to complete the cure, provided that Borrower has commenced to cure
within the initial 30-day period and diligently prosecutes such cure to completion.
5.1.3. Borrower (a) is unable, or admits in writing its inability, to pay its
monetary obligations as they become due, (b) makes a general assignment for the benefit of
creditors, or (c) applies for, consents to or acquiesces in the appointment of a trustee, receiver or
other custodian for itself or its property, or, in the absence of such application, consent or
-12-
acquiescence, a trustee, receiver or other custodian is appointed for Borrower or the property of
Borrower (including the Development), and such appointment is not discharged within sixty (60)
days.
5.1.4. The commencement of any case under the Bankruptcy Code or
commencement of any other bankruptcy, arrangement, receivership, custodianship or similar
proceeding under any federal, state or foreign law by or against Borrower, provided that if any
such case or other bankruptcy, arrangement, reorganization, receivership, custodianship or
similar proceeding is commenced against Borrower, such case or other bankruptcy, arrangement,
receivership, custodianship or similar proceeding is not dismissed within sixty (60) days after its
commencement.
5.1.5. A final judgment or decree for monetary damages or a monetary
fine or penalty (not subject to appeal or as to which the time for appeal has expired) is entered
against Borrower by any Governmental Authority, and such judgment, decree, fine or penalty is
not paid and discharged or stayed within sixty (60) days after the entry thereof.
5.1.6. The assets of Borrower are attached, levied on or otherwise seized
by legal process, and such attachment, levy or seizure is not quashed, stayed or released within
sixty (60) days of the date thereof.
5.1.7. There shall be filed any claim of lien against the Property or the
service of any notice to withhold proceeds of the Loan and the continued maintenance of such
claim of lien or notice to withhold for a period of sixty (60) days without discharge or
satisfaction thereof or provision therefor (including the posting of bonds) satisfactory to City.
5.1.8. The occurrence of any conveyance that is prohibited under
Section 4.6.
5.1.9. A failure to comply in any respect with the Schedule of
Performance (subject to force majeure delays under Section 6.11 below), and such failure is not
cured within thirty (30) days after written notice from City. If such failure is not curable within
30 days, Borrower may have such longer period of time as is reasonably necessary not to exceed
an additional 30 days to complete the cure, provided that Borrower has commenced to cure
within the initial 30-day period and diligently prosecutes such cure to completion.
5.1.10. Borrower's violation of any law or permit applicable to the
Property or Improvements (or other improvements on the Property) that is not cured within thirty
(30) days after written notice from City. If such failure is not curable within 30 days, Borrower
may have such longer period of time as is reasonably necessary to complete the cure, provided
that Borrower has commenced to cure within the initial 30-day period and diligently prosecutes
such cure to completion.
5.1.11. Borrower's default under any other loans secured by the Property
which is not cured within any applicable cure period in the loan documents for such loan.
-13-
5.2. Remedies. The occurrence of any Default by Borrower will relieve City
of any obligation to make further disbursement of the Loan and shall give City the right to
proceed with any and all remedies set forth in the Loan Documents, including the following:
5.2.1. City shall have the right to declare, by written notice to Borrower,
the outstanding principal balance of the Loan, together with any accrued and unpaid interest
thereon, due and payable as of the date stated in such notice as determined by City in its sole and
absolute discretion. City may proceed to enforce payment thereof and to exercise any or all
rights afforded to City as a creditor and secured party under law, including the California,
including foreclosure of the Deed of Trust. Borrower shall be obligated to pay City, on demand,
all reasonable expenses, costs and fees (including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses) paid
or incurred by City in connection with the collection of the Loan and the preservation,
maintenance, protection, sale or other disposition of the security for the Loan, and such
obligation shall be secured by the Deed of Trust.
5.2.2. City shall have the right to mandamus or other suit, action or
proceeding at law or in equity to require Borrower to perform its obligations under the Loan
Documents or to enjoin acts or things that may be unlawful or in violation of the provisions of
the Loan Documents.
5.2.3. City may cure any default by Borrower under the Loan
Documents. Borrower shall be liable to reimburse City, on demand, for any funds advanced by
City to cure any such monetary default, together with interest thereon at the lesser of the
maximum rate permitted by law or eight percent (8%) per annum from the date of expenditure
until the date of reimbursement.
5.2.4. City shall have the right to file for record, as Borrower's attorney -
in -fact (which appointment is a power coupled with an interest and is irrevocable), any notices of
completion, notices of cessation of labor, notices of non -responsibility or any other notices that
City considers necessary to protect its security for the Loan.
5.2.5. City shall also be entitled to all other remedies available at law, in
equity or otherwise, including the right to foreclose the Deed of Trust.
5.2.6. Prior to exercising any remedies hereunder, City will give
Borrower's investor limited partner notice of default at the same time such notice is given to
Borrower provided City shall have been given such investor limited partner's name and address
by Borrower in writing. The investor limited partner shall have the cure periods set forth above
within which to cure the default and City will accept or reject such cure on the same basis as if
such cure had been tendered by Borrower.
5.3. Right of Contest. Borrower shall have the right to contest in good faith
any claim, demand, levy or assessment the assertion of which would constitute a Default
hereunder. Any such contest shall be prosecuted diligently and in a manner that does not
prejudice the rights of City under the Loan Documents.
5.4. Remedies Cumulative. No right, power or remedy given to City by the
terms of the Loan Documents is intended to be exclusive of any other right, power or remedy,
and each and every such right, power or remedy shall be cumulative and in addition to every
-14-
other right, power or remedy given to City by the terms of the Loan Documents, by law or
otherwise. Neither the failure nor any delay on the part of City to exercise any such right, power
or remedy shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise by City of any
such right, power or remedy preclude any other or further exercise of such right, power or
remedy, or any other right, power or remedy.
6. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
6.1. Relationship of Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be
interpreted by the Parties, or any other party, as creating the relationship of employer and
employee, principal and agent, partnership or any other form of joint venture between City and
Borrower, and Borrower shall at all times be deemed an independent contractor and shall be
completely responsible for the manner in which it performs its obligations under this Agreement.
6.2. No Claims. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create or authorize
any claim against City by any Person that Borrower may have employed or with whom Borrower
may have contracted related to the purchase of materials, supplies or equipment, or the
furnishing or the performance of any work or services with respect to the construction or
operation of the Property, and Borrower shall include similar requirements in any contracts
entered into for the construction or operation of the Property.
6.3. Amendments. No modification of the terms of this Agreement shall be
valid unless made in writing and signed by the Parties.
6.4. Indemnification for Prevailing Wages Claims. Borrower shall indemnify,
defend, protect and hold harmless City and its councilmembers, officers, employees, agents,
successors and assigns (collectively, "Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims
(including, without limitation, any claim under Labor Code Section 1781), losses, proceedings,
damages, causes of action, liabilities, costs and expenses, (including attorneys' fees)
(collectively, "Claim") arising from or in connection with, or caused by any violations of law by
Developer or any contractor, including, without limitation, any failure to comply with Labor
Code Sections 1720 et. seq. If any action or proceeding be brought against City by reason of any
such claim, Borrower, upon notice from City, shall defend the same at Borrower's expense with
counsel satisfactory to City (which shall not be unreasonably withheld). BORROWER'S DUTY
AND OBLIGATIONS TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD CITY HARMLESS CITY
SHALL SURVIVE CANCELLATION OF THE NOTE AND THE RECONVEYANCE OF
THE DEED OF TRUST WITH RESPECT TO EVENTS OCCURRING PRIOR TO THE
CANCELLATION OF THE NOTE AND RECONVEYANCE OF THE DEED OF TRUST.
6.5. Non -Liability. of and City Officials, Employees and Agents. No
member, official, employee or agent of City shall be personally liable to Borrower in the event of
any default or breach by City, or for any amount that may become due to Borrower, under the
terms of this Agreement.
6.6. No Third Party Beneficiaries. There shall be no third party beneficiaries
of this Agreement.
6.7. Notices, Demands and Communications. Except as otherwise required by
law, any notice, request, direction, demand, consent, waiver, approval or other communication
-15-
required or permitted to be given hereunder shall not be effective unless it is given in writing and
shall be delivered (a) by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or (b) by a
commercial overnight courier that guarantees next day delivery and provides a receipt, and
addressed to the parties at the addresses stated below, or at such other address as either party may
hereafter notify the other in writing as aforementioned:
City: City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: City Manager
Borrower: Las Haciendas Housing Associates, L.P.
c/o Community HousingWorks
3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92108
Attn: President/CEO, Susan M. Reynolds
With a copy to: Downs Pham & Kuei LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94010
Attn: Irene C. Kuei
Service of any such notice or other communications so made shall be deemed effective
on the day of actual delivery (whether accepted or refused), as shown by the addressee's return
receipt if by certified mail, and as confirmed by the courier service if by courier; provided,
however, that if such actual delivery occurs after 5:00 p.m. (local time where received) or on a
non -business day, then such notice or demand so made shall be deemed effective on the first
business day following the day of actual delivery. No communications via electronic mail shall
be effective to give any notice, request, direction, demand, consent, waiver, approval or other
communications hereunder.
6.8. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to conflict of laws
principles.
6.9. Attorneys' Fees. Should any action be brought to enforce any provision
hereof, the prevailing parry in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, court
costs and other litigation expenses, including expenses incurred for preparation and discovery.
The right to recover such fees, costs and expenses shall accrue upon the commencement of the
action regardless of whether the action is prosecuted to final judgment.
6.10. Severability. If any term of this Agreement is held by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall
continue in full force and effect unless the rights and obligations of the Parties have been
materially altered or abridged by such invalidation, voiding or unenforceability.
6.11. Force Majeure. A Party shall not be deemed to be in default where delays
are due to war; insurrection; strikes; lock -outs; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; quarantine
-16-
restrictions; freight embargoes; lack of transportation; or court order; or any other similar causes
(other than lack of funds of Borrower or Borrower's inability to finance the construction of the
Development) beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming an extension of time
to perform. An extension of time for any cause will be deemed granted if notice by the Party
claiming such extension is sent to the other within ten (10) days from the commencement of the
cause.
6.12. Approvals/Amendments. Whenever this Agreement calls for or
contemplates City approval or consent (including approval of the form and substance of other
documents), the written approval or consent or waiver of the City Manager shall constitute the
approval or consent of City. The City hereby also authorizes the City Manager to make non -
substantial changes to this Agreement, including, reasonable extensions of time deadlines set
forth in this Agreement, and increase in Preliminary Project Budget not in excess of 15%
provided they are in writing, and to send notices and demands, initiate and administer remedies
and otherwise administer the Loan Documents. The City Manager shall have the authority to
review and approve all documents listed in Section 3.5 hereof and may prohibit disbursement of
Loan funds if the documents are not reasonably satisfactory to the City Manager.
6.13. Warranty Against Payment of Consideration for Agreement. Borrower
warrants that it has not paid or given, and will not pay or give, any Person, including the City,
the City, or any member, official or employee thereof, any money or other consideration for
obtaining this Agreement.
6.14. Time. Time is of the essence with respect to this Agreement and the
performance of each obligation contained herein.
6.15. Multiple Originals; Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in
multiple originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, and may be signed in counterparts.
WHEREAS, this Agreement has been entered into by the undersigned as of the date first
above written.
CITY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
WE
ATTEST:
1-2
Randi Johl, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter Thorson, City Attorney
James Stewart
Mayor
-17-
BORROWER:
LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P.,
a California limited partnership
By: CHW Las Haciendas LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its General Partner
By: Community HousingWorks,
a California nonprofit public benefit corporation,
its Sole Member and Manager
ME
Mary Jane Jagodzinski, Senior Vice President
in
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of Riverside and described
as follows:
Lots 16 and 20 of Tract 3841, City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map filed
in Book 61, Page(s) 75 and 76 of Maps, and amended by a Certificate of Correction recorded August 25,
1987 as Instrument No. 246382, Records of Riverside County, California.
APN: 921-050-016-2 and 921-050-020-5
Exhibit "A"
Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT "B"
SCOPE OF DEVELOPMENT
77 unit apartment project, with 111 parking spaces (91 onsite and 20 on street), a community
building, laundry facilities, a computer room and a children's playground.
Exhbit `B"
Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT "C"
FORM OF DEED OF TRUST
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO:
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Attn: City Clerk
With a copy to:
Community Housing Works
3111 Camino del Rio North
Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92108
Attn: Mary Jane Jagodzinski
APN(s): 921-050-016-2; 921-050-020-5
(Space Above This Line For Recorder's Use)
Free Recording Requested Pursuant To Government Code Section 27383
DEED OF TRUST, ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS, SECURITY AGREEMENT
AND FIXTURE FILING
This Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing is dated
, 20_, and is executed by LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES,
L.P., a California limited partnership, herein called Trustor, whose address is c/o Community
Housing Works, 3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92108, in favor of First
American Title Insurance Company, as Trustee, for the benefit of the CITY OF TEMECULA,
herein called Beneficiary.
Witnesseth: That Trustor IRREVOCABLY GRANTS, TRANSFERS AND ASSIGNS
TO TRUSTEE IN TRUST, WITH POWER OF SALE, that property in Riverside County,
California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,
together with all improvements and fixtures thereon and all goods and other personal property
owned by Trustor and located thereon (collectively, the "Property").
TOGETHER WITH the rents, issues and profits thereof, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to the
right, power and authority hereinafter given to and conferred upon Beneficiary to collect and
supply such rents, issues and profits.
For the Purpose of Securing:
C-1
Payment of principal and interest, if and when due, under that certain Secured Promissory
Note in the stated principal amount of $ dated substantially concurrently herewith
executed by Trustor in favor of Beneficiary.
A breach or default under said Secured Promissory Note or the Affordability Restrictions
and Regulatory Agreement between Trustor and Beneficiary shall also be a default hereunder.
To Protect the Security of This Deed of Trust, Trustor Agrees:
(1) To keep said Property in good condition and repair; not to remove or demolish
any building thereon; to complete or restore promptly and in good workmanlike manner any
building which may be constructed, damaged or destroyed thereon and to pay when due all
claims for labor performed and materials furnished thereof, to comply with all laws affecting
said Property, or requiring any alterations or improvements to be made thereon; not to commit or
permit waste thereof, not to commit, suffer or permit any act upon said Property in violation of
law; and to do all other acts which from the character or use of said Property may be reasonably
necessary, the specific enumerations herein not excluding the general.
(2) To provide or cause to provide, maintain and deliver to Beneficiary fire insurance
satisfactory to and with loss payable to Beneficiary and any superior trust deed holder, as their
interests may appear. The amount collected under any fire or other insurance policy may be
applied by Beneficiary upon any indebtedness secured hereby and in such order as Beneficiary
may determine, or at option of Beneficiary the entire amount so collected or any part thereof may
be released to Trustor. Such application or release shall not cure or waive any default or notice of
default hereunder or invalidate any act done pursuant to such notice.
(3) To appear in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security
hereof or the rights or powers of Beneficiary or Trustee; and to pay all costs and expenses,
including cost of evidence of title and attorney's fees in a reasonable sum, in any such action or
proceeding in which Beneficiary or Trustee may appear, and in any suit brought by Beneficiary
to foreclose this Deed of Trust.
(4) To pay: at least ten days before delinquency all taxes and assessments affecting
said Property, including assessments on appurtenant water stock; when due, all encumbrances,
charges and liens, with interest, on said Property or any part thereof, which appear to be prior or
superior hereto; all costs, fees and expenses of this Trust.
Should Trustor fail to make any payment or to do any act as herein provided, then
Beneficiary or Trustee, but without obligation so to do and without notice to or demand upon
Trustor and without releasing Trustor from any obligation hereof, may: (a) make or do the same
in such manner and to such extent as either may deem necessary to protect the security hereof,
Beneficiary or Trustee being authorized to enter upon said Property for such purposes; (b) appear
in and defend any action or proceeding purporting to affect the security hereof or the rights or
powers of Beneficiary or Trustee; (c) pay, purchase, contest or compromise any encumbrance,
charge or lien which in the judgment of either appears to be prior or superior hereto; and (d) in
exercising any such powers, pay necessary expenses, employ counsel and pay his reasonable
fees.
C-2
(5) To pay immediately and without demand all sums so expended by Beneficiary or
Trustee, with interest from date of expenditure at the amount allowed by law in effect at the date
hereof, and to pay for any statement provided for by law in effect at the date hereof regarding the
obligation secured hereby any amount demanded by the Beneficiary not to exceed the maximum
allowed by law at the time when said statement is demanded.
(6) That any award of damages in connection with any condemnation for public use
of or injury to said Property or any part thereof is hereby assigned and shall be paid to
Beneficiary (and to any superior trust deed holder, as their interests may appear) who may apply
or release such moneys received by him in the same manner and with the same effect as above
provided for disposition of proceeds of fire or other insurance.
(7) That by accepting payment of any sum secured hereby after its due date,
Beneficiary does not waive his right either to require prompt payment when due of all other sums
so secured or to declare default for failure so to pay.
(8) That at any time or from time to time, without liability therefore and without
notice, upon written request of Beneficiary and presentation of this Deed of Trust and said note
for endorsement, and without affecting the personal liability of any person for payment of the
indebtedness secured hereby, Trustee may: (a) reconvey any part of said Property; (b) consent to
the making of any map or plat thereof, (c) join in granting any easement thereon; or (d) join in
any extension agreement or any agreement subordinating the lien or charge hereof.
(9) That upon written request of Beneficiary stating that all sums secured hereby have
been paid, and upon surrender of this Deed of Trust and said note to Trustee for cancellation and
retention and upon payment of its fees, Trustee shall reconvey, without warranty, the Property
then held hereunder. The recitals in such reconveyance of any matters or facts shall be
conclusive proof of the truthfulness thereof. The grantee in such reconveyance may be described
as "the person or persons legally entitled thereto." Five years after issuance of such full
reconveyance, Trustee may destroy said note and this Deed of Trust (unless directed in such
request to retain them).
(10) That as additional security, subject to the rights of superior trust deed holders, as
their interests may appear, Trustor hereby gives to and confers upon Beneficiary the right, power
and authority, during the continuance of these trusts, to collect the rents, issues and profits of
said Property, reserving unto Trustor the right, prior to any default by Trustor in payment of any
indebtedness secured hereby or in performance of any agreement hereunder, to collect and retain
such rents, issues and profits as they become due and payable. Upon any such default,
Beneficiary may at any time without notice, either in person, by agent, or by a receiver to be
appointed by a court, and without regard to the adequacy of any security for the indebtedness
hereby secured, enter upon and take possession of said Property or any part thereof, in his own
name sue for or otherwise collect such rents, issues and profits, including those past due and
unpaid, and apply the same, less costs and expenses of operation and collection, including
reasonable attorney's fees, upon any indebtedness secured hereby, and in such order as
Beneficiary may determine. The entering upon and taking possession of said Property, the
collection of such rents, issues and profits and the application thereof as aforesaid, shall not cure
C-3
or waive any default or notice of default hereunder or invalidate any act done pursuant to such
notice.
(11) That upon default by Trustor in payment of any indebtedness secured hereby, or
in performance of any agreement hereunder, or default by Trustor under the Secured Promissory
Note or the Affordability Restrictions and Regulatory Agreement executed by Trustor that is not
cured within the cure period, if any, expressly described therein and applicable to the default,
Beneficiary may declare all sums secured hereby immediately due and payable by delivery to
Trustee of written declaration of default and demand for sale and of written notice of default and
election to cause to be sold said Property, which notice Trustee shall cause to be filed for record.
After the lapse of such time as may then be required by law following the recordation of
said notice of default, and notice of sale having been given as then required by law, Trustee,
without demand on Trustor, shall sell said Property at the time and place fixed by it in said notice
of sale, either as a whole or in separate parcels, and in such order as it may determine, at public
auction to the highest bidder for cash in lawful money of the United States, payable at time of
sale. Trustee may postpone sale of all or any portion of said Property by public announcement at
such time and place of sale, and from time to time thereafter may postpone such sale by public
announcement at the time fixed by the preceding postponement. Trustee shall deliver to such
highest bidder its deed conveying the Property so sold, but without any covenant or warranty,
express or implied. The recitals in such deed of any matters or facts shall be conclusive proof of
the truthfulness thereof. Any person, including Trustor, Trustee, or Beneficiary may purchase
the Property at such sale.
After deducting all costs, fees and expenses of Trustee and of this Trust, including cost of
evidence of title in connection with sale, Trustee shall apply the proceeds of sale to payment of:
all sums expended under the terms hereof, not then repaid, with accrued interest at the amount
allowed by law in effect at the date hereof; all other sums then secured hereby; and the
remainder, if any, to the person or persons legally entitled thereto.
(12) Beneficiary, or any successor in ownership of any indebtedness secured hereby,
may from time to time, by instrument in writing, substitute a successor or successors to any
Trustee named herein or acting hereunder, which instrument, executed by the Beneficiary and
duly acknowledged and recorded in the office of the recorder of the county or counties where
said Property is situated, shall be conclusive proof of proper substitution of such successor
Trustee or Trustees, who shall, without conveyance from the Trustee predecessor, succeed to all
its title estate, rights, powers and duties. Said instrument must contain the name of the original
Trustor, Trustee and Beneficiary hereunder, the book and page where this Deed of Trust is
recorded and the name and address of the new Trustee.
(13) That this Deed of Trust applies to, inures to the benefit of, and binds all parties
hereto, their heirs, legatees, devisees, administrators, executors, successors and assigns. The
term Beneficiary shall include the owner and holder, including pledges, of the note secured
hereby, whether or not named as Beneficiary herein. In this Deed of Trust, whenever the context
so requires, the masculine gender includes the feminine and/or neuter, and the singular number
includes the plural.
(14) That Trustee accepts this Trust when this Deed of Trust, duly executed and
acknowledged, is made a public record as provided by law. Trustee is not obligated to notify any
party hereto of pending sale under any Deed of Trust or of any action or proceeding in which
Trustor, Beneficiary or Trustee shall be a party unless brought by Trustee.
(15) If the Trustor shall sell, lease, transfer, assign, convey, encumber, mortgage,
hypothecate or alienate the real property described herein, or any part thereof, or any interest
therein, or shall be divested of title or any interest therein in any manner or way, whether
voluntarily or involuntarily prior to completion of the development described in the Loan
Agreement between Trustor and Beneficiary, (except as expressly permitted by Beneficiary
pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Regulatory Agreement between Trustor and
Beneficiary), or if Trustor shall fail to make any payments due under the note secured by this
Deed of Trust, or fail to perform any other obligation under said Restrictive Agreement, this
Deed of Trust or the note secured hereby, or any other deed of trust encumbering the subject
Property, then Beneficiary shall have the right, at its option, to declare any indebtedness or
obligations secured hereby, irrespective of the maturity date specified in any note evidencing the
same, immediately due and payable.
(16) Notwithstanding anything provided herein to the contrary, the Beneficiary agrees
to look solely to the Trustor's interest in the Property encumbered hereby and improvements
thereon (or the proceeds thereof) for the satisfaction of any remedy of the Beneficiary, and for
the collection of a judgment (or other judicial process) requiring the payment of money by the
Trustor, except where such judgment results from a claim of fraud; intentional misrepresentation;
misapplication; misappropriation; or wrongful retention of rental income; casualty insurance;
condemnation proceeds; or other funds attributable to the Property; the commission of any act of
deliberate waste with respect to the Property encumbered hereby; or the deposit of any hazardous
or toxic materials on the Property encumbered hereby; in which events there shall be no such
limitation on the Beneficiary's recourse against the Trustor.
(17) This Deed of Trust is also intended to be and shall constitute both a Security
Agreement and a "fixture filing" as defined in the California Commercial Code, the Trustor
being the Debtor and the Beneficiary being the Secured Party. Trustor hereby grants Beneficiary
a security interest in all fixtures, and in all goods which are or are to become fixtures on the
Land, for the purpose of securing all indebtedness and other obligations of Trustor now or
hereafter secured by this Deed of Trust. The products of such collateral are also covered hereby.
This Deed of Trust, as a fixture filing, is to be recorded in the real estate records covering the
real property covered hereby. Trustor authorizes Beneficiary to execute, deliver, file and record
(as necessary) financing and continuation statements covering such property from time to time in
such form as Beneficiary may require to perfect and continue the perfection of Beneficiary's
security interest with respect to such property, and to reimburse Beneficiary for any costs
incurred in filing such financing statements and any continuation statements. Trustor shall not
create or allow the creation of any other security interest in such property. Upon the occurrence
of any default by Trustor hereunder, Beneficiary shall have the rights and remedies of a secured
party under the California Commercial Code, as well as all other rights and remedies available at
law or in equity or as provided herein, all at Beneficiary's option. Trustor and Beneficiary agree
that the filing of a financing statement in the records normally having to do with personal
property shall never be construed as in any way derogating from or impairing this declaration
C-5
and the hereby stated intention of the parties hereto that everything used in connection with the
operation or occupancy of such property or the production of income therefrom is and, at all
times and for all purposes and in all proceedings, both legal and equitable, shall be regarded as
real property encumbered by this Deed of Trust and fixture filing, irrespective of whether (a) any
such item is physically attached to the buildings and improvements, (b) serial numbers are used
for the better identification of certain equipment, or (c) any such item is referred to or reflected in
any such financing statement so filed at any time. Such mention in the financing statement is
declared to be for the protection of the Beneficiary in the event any court or judge shall at any
time hold that notice of Beneficiary's priority of interest must be filed in the Uniform
Commercial Code records to be effective against a particular class of persons, including, but not
limited to, the federal government and any subdivisions or entities of the federal government.
The undersigned Trustor requests that a copy of any Notice of Default and of any Notice
of Sale hereunder be mailed to him at his address hereinbefore set forth.
.W.
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual
who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity
of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On before me, Notary
Public, personally appeared , who proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity(ies) upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
Place Notary Seal Above
C-7
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual
who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity
of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On before me, Notary
Public, personally appeared , who proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity(ies) upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
Place Notary Seal Above
AN
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Mt
EXHIBIT "D"
FORM OF PROMISSORY NOTE
SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
, 202
Temecula, California
$9,629,143.00
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned [LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES,
L.P., a California limited partnership] ("Maker" or "Developer"), having its principal place of
business at c/o Community Housingworks, 3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 800, San Diego,
CA 92108, promises to pay to the order of the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation
("Payee" or "City"), at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, or at such other place as the
holder of this Note from time to time may designate in writing, the principal sum of $718,445.00
constituting deferred development fees and $8,910,698.00 of construction loan funds
(colletively, $9,629,143), together with interest on the outstanding principal amount of this
promissory note (the "City Loan Note") at the "Applicable Interest Rate," as defined below, in
lawful money of the United States of America.
This City Loan Note is being delivered, and the loans evidenced hereby are being made, pursuant
to the terms of that certain Loan Agreement between Developer and City ("Loan Agreement").
All capitalized terms used herein which are not separately defined herein shall have the meanings
set forth therefor in the Loan Agreement.
Upon the date hereof, the sum of $718,445 (consisting of deferred development fees) shall be
deemed outstanding. The remainder of the loan principal (consisting of construction loan funds)
shall be disbursed by City subject to the terms and conditions in Section 3.7 of the Loan
Agreement (or by the Senior Project Lender pursuant to the Disbursement Agreement between
City and such Senior Project Lender) .
"Applicable Interest Rate" means three percent (3%) per annum, simple interest, on outstanding
principal, except that amounts not paid when due shall accrue interest from the date due until the
date paid at the lesser of: (i) seven percent (7%) per annum, simple interest, or (ii) the maximum
rate permitted by applicable law.
1. Payments. Payments under this City Loan Note shall be due and payable as
follow: Payments of fifty percent (50%) of all Residual Receipts ("City Portion") payable on
April 30 after the first anniversary of completion of construction of the Project pursuant to the
Loan Agreement, and each anniversary thereafter until this City Loan Note has been satisfied in
full. Payments shall first be applied to accrued interest, then to the first $718,445.00 of principal
(representing deferred fees), then to remaining outstanding principal. In addition, the entire
amount of outstanding principal and accrued interest and any additional amounts which become
owing hereunder shall be paid by Maker to Payee as of the earliest of (i) a default under the Loan
Agreement, the Regulatory Agreement entered pursuant to the Loan Agreement, or the deed of
trust securing this City Loan Note not cured within the applicable cure period after delivery of
D-1
required notice; (ii) as provided in Section 4 below; (iii) fifty-five (55) years after the date of this
City Loan Note (the "Maturity Date").
2. Secured by Deed of Trust. Repayment of this City Loan Note is secured by a
deed of trust (the "City Deed of Trust") of this date executed by Maker for the benefit of Payee
encumbering the property described in the City Deed of Trust (the "Property" or "Site").
3. Prepayment. Maker shall have the right to prepay amounts owing under this City
Loan note at any time, without penalty or premium.
4. Due on Sale or Encumbrance. In the event of any Transfer (as defined below) of
the Property, or any portion thereof or interest therein, Payee shall have the absolute right at its
option, without prior demand or notice, to declare all sums secured hereby immediately due and
payable. As used herein, the term "Transfer" means and includes the direct or indirect sale,
transfer, conveyance, assignment, or other alienation of the Property, or any portion thereof or
interest therein, whether voluntary, involuntary, by operation of law or otherwise, or the lease of
all or substantially all of the Property or of all or substantially all of the improvements located
thereon. Transfer shall not include the sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, hypothecation or
encumbrance by Developer's limited partner of its partnership interest to the extent permitted by
the Loan Agreement, nor shall Transfer include the removal of any general partner of Developer
by the limited partner for cause and the replacement of such removed general partner by another
person or entity in accordance with the terms of Developer's partnership agreement to the extent
permitted by the Loan Agreement. "Transfer" shall not include a Transfer permitted in the Loan
Agreement so long as Trustor complies with the provisions of the Regulatory Agreement relating
to such leasing activity. "Transfer" shall not include the leasing of individual Units on the
Property. Failure of Beneficiary to exercise the option to declare all sums secured hereby
immediately due and payable upon a Transfer will not constitute waiver of the right to exercise
this option in the event of any subsequent Transfer.
5. Miscellaneous.
(a) Governing Law. All questions with respect to the construction of this City
Loan Note and the rights and liabilities of the parties to this City Loan Note shall be governed by
the laws of the State of California.
(b) Binding on Successors. This City Loan Note shall inure to the benefit of,
and shall be binding upon, the successors and assigns of each of the parties to this City Loan
Note.
(c) Attorneys' Fees.
(i) Maker shall reimburse Payee for all reasonable attorneys' fees,
costs and expenses, incurred by Payee in connection with the enforcement of Payee's rights
under this City Loan Note, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and
expenses for trial, appellate proceedings, out -of -court negotiations, workouts and settlements or
for enforcement of rights under any state or federal statute, including, without limitation,
reasonable attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred to protect Payee's security and attorneys'
fees, costs and expenses incurred in bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings such as (but not
D-2
limited to) seeking relief from stay in a bankruptcy proceeding. The term "expenses" means any
expenses incurred by Payee in connection with any of the out -of -court, or state, federal or
bankruptcy proceedings referred to above, including, without limitation, the fees and expenses of
any appraisers, consultants and expert witnesses retained or consulted by Payee in connection
with any such proceeding.
(ii) Payee shall also be entitled to its attorneys' fees, costs and
expenses incurred in any post judgment proceedings to collect and enforce the judgment. This
provision is separate and several and shall survive the merger of this City Loan Note into any
judgment on this City Loan Note.
(d) Entire Agreement. This City Loan Note and the relevant provisions of the
Loan Agreement constitute the entire agreement and understanding between and among the
parties in respect of the subject matter of such agreements and supersede all prior agreements
and understandings with respect to such subject matter, whether oral or written.
(e) Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to every
provision hereof.
(f) Waivers by Maker. Except as otherwise provided in any agreement
executed in connection with this City Loan Note, Maker waives: presentment; demand; notice of
dishonor; notice of default or delinquency; notice of acceleration; notice of protest and
nonpayment; notice of costs, expenses or losses and interest thereon; and diligence in taking any
action to collect any sums arising under this City Loan Note or in any proceeding against any of
the rights or interests in or to properties securing payment of this City Loan Note.
(g) Non -waivers. No previous waiver and no failure or delay by Maker in
acting with respect to the terms of this City Loan Note or the City Deed of Trust shall constitute
a waiver of any breach, default, or failure of condition under this City Loan Note, the City Deed
of Trust or the obligations secured thereby. A waiver of any term of this City Loan Note, the
City Deed of Trust or of any of the obligations secured thereby must be made in writing and shall
be limited to the express written terms of such waiver. In the event of any inconsistencies
between the terms of this City Loan Agreement Note and the terms of any other document
related to the loan evidenced by this City Loan Agreement Note, the terms of this City Loan
Note shall prevail.
(h) Non -Recourse. Repayment of this Note and all other obligations of
Borrower hereunder, under the Loan Agreement, Regulatory Agreement or City Deed of Trust
shall be a non -recourse obligation of Borrower, such that neither Borrower nor any partner of
Borrower shall have any personal obligation to make any payments or perform any other
obligations of Borrower.
(i) Cure by Limited Partners. City hereby agrees that any cure of any default
made or tendered by Developer's limited partners who shall have been identified in writing by
Developer to City and shall be deemed to be a cure by Developer and shall be accepted or
rejected on the same basis as if made or tendered by Developer; provided City shall have
D-3
received written notice by Developer of the identity of, and address for notices for, such limited
partners and a copy of the applicable limited partnership agreement and amendments showing
they are limited partners.
MAKER:
Will
CALIFORNIA ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual
who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity
of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On before me, Notary
Public, personally appeared , who proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the
same in his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity(ies) upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
Place Notary Seal Above
D-5
EXHIBIT "E"
FORM OF NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS
(Attached.)
E-1
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: City Clerk
with a copy to:
Community HousingWorks
3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92108
Attn: Mary Jane Jagodzinski
APN: 921-050-016-2; 921-050-020-5
Exempt From Recording Fee Pursuant to Government Code § 27383
NOTICE OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS
ON TRANSFER OF PROPERTY
Important notice to owners, purchasers, tenants, lenders, brokers, escrow and title companies,
and other persons, regarding affordable housing restrictions on the real property described in
this Notice: Affordable housing restrictions have been recorded with respect to the property
described below (referred to in this Notice as the "Site") which require that the Site be developed
as an affordable rental housing development (the "Project") and that all of the units be rented to
and occupied by persons and households of limited income at affordable rents.
Title of Document Containing Affordable Housing Restrictions: Affordability
Restrictions and Regulatory Agreement (Low/Mod Set -Aside Funds) ("Agreement").
Parties to Agreement: ("Developer") and the City of Temecula ("City").
The Agreement is recorded concurrently with this Notice, in the Official Records of
Riverside County.
Legal Description of Site: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference.
Site Location: 28715 Las Haciendas Street and 28772 Calle Cortez.
Assessor's Parcel Number of Site: 921-050-016-2; 921-050-020-5
Summary of Agreement:
E-2
o The Agreement requires Developer to develop a seventy-seven (77) unit (each, a
"Unit") rental housing project on property being acquired by Developer from the
City, but one unit is a manager's unit.
o The Agreement restricts the rental of
37 Units ("Required Affordable Units"), which are required to be
rented to and occupied by Extremely Low Income Households, Very
Low Income Households and Low Income households, whose annual
income generally cannot exceed 30%, 50%, or 60% (respectively) of
Area Median Income for the Riverside County area, adjusted for
household size.
o Area Median Income limits (or "AMI") are all as published periodically by the
California Department of Housing and Community Development.
o The Agreement restricts the rents that may be charged to households occupying
Required Household Units to the following maximum rents ("Affordable Rent"):
• Affordable Rent for Extremely Low Income Households shall be 30%
x 30% of AMI (as described in the Agreement) for a household size
appropriate to the unit, including a reasonable utility allowance;
• Affordable Rent for Very Low Income Households shall be 30% x
50% of AMI for a household size appropriate to the unit, including a
reasonable utility allowance;
• Affordable Rent for Low Income Households shall be 30% x 60% of
AMI for a household size appropriate to the unit, including a
reasonable utility allowance;
• Household size appropriate to the unit shall be two persons for a one
bedroom unit, three persons for a two bedroom unit, and 4 persons for
a three bedroom unit.
• The term of the Agreement is fifty-five (55) years from the date of the
City's issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy for the Project.
This Notice does not contain a full description of the details of all of the terms and
conditions of the Agreement. You will need to obtain and read the Agreement to fully
understand the restrictions and requirements which apply to the Site.
E-3
This Notice is being recorded and filed in compliance with Health and Safety Code
Section 33334.3(f)(3) and (4), and shall be indexed against Developer.
Date: , 202
CITY:
CITY OF TEMECULA
By:
Print Name:
City Manager
DEVELOPER:
E-4
CALIFORNIA ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual
who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity
of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On before me, Notary
Public, personally appeared , who proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed
to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity(ies) upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
Place Notary Seal Above
E-5
CALIFORNIA ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual
who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity
of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On before me, Notary
Public, personally appeared , who proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed
to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity(ies) upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Place Notary Seal Above
Signature of Notary Public
CALIFORNIA ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual
who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity
of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
On before me, Notary
Public, personally appeared , who proved
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed
to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in
his/her/their authorized capacity, and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity(ies) upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary Public
Place Notary Seal Above
E-7
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as
follows:
EXHIBIT "F'
PRELIMINARY PROJECT BUDGET
[INTENTIONALLY OMITTED; DELIVERY OF PROJECT BUDGET IS CONDITION TO
CLOSING]
F-1
EXHIBIT "G"
FORM OF AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATORY AGREEMENT
RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: City Clerk
with a copy to:
Community HousingWorks
3111 Camino del Rio North, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92108
Attn: Mary Jane Jagodzinski
APN(s): 921-050-016-2; 921-050-020-5
(Space
Use.)
This document is exempt from the payment of a recording fee
pursuant to Government Code Section 6103.
AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATORY AGREEMENT
(Low -Mod Set Aside Funds)
These AFFORDABILITY RESTRICTIONS AND REGULATORY AGREEMENT
("Regulatory Agreement") is hereby entered, effective as of , 202_, by and
among the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, as successor to the housing assets
and funds of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency ("City"), and
("Developer") (City and Developer are sometimes collectively
referred to herein as the "Parties.").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, City and Developer have entered into that certain Loan Agreement dated as of
, 2020 (the "Loan Agreement") for the improvement and development of a 77 unit
apartment project on the real property described in Exhibit "A" (the "Site") which Loan
Agreement provides for the City to make a loan to Developer of low/mod income housing set
aside funds conditioned upon, among other things, the execution and recordation of this
Regulatory Agreement. Any capitalized term not defined herein shall have the meaning
established therefor in the Loan Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Developer declare that the Site shall be held, transferred,
encumbered, used, sold, conveyed, leased and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions and
restrictions hereinafter set forth expressly and exclusively for the use and benefit of said
property. Each and all of the restrictions, limitations, conditions, covenants, liens, reservations
and charges herein contained shall run with the land and be recorded on the property title and
shall be binding on Parties, their grantees, successors, heirs, executors, administrators, devisees
or assigns, and all subsequent owners of all or any part of the Site, during the term of this
Regulatory Agreement.
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
The definitions provided herein shall be applicable to this Regulatory Agreement and also to any
amendment or supplement (unless the context implicitly or explicitly shall prohibit), recorded
against the Site pursuant to the provision of this Regulatory Agreement.
Section 1. "Affiliated Person" means, when used in reference to a specific person, any
person that directly or indirectly controls or is controlled by or under common control with the
specified person, any person that is an officer or director of, a trustee of, or a general partner,
managing member or operator in, the specified person or of which the specified person is an
officer, director, trustee, general partner or managing member,.
Section 2. "Affordable Housing Development" means an affordable housing project
operated in conformity with this Regulatory Agreement throughout the Required Covenant Period.
Section 3. "Affordable Rent", per month, means, for an Extremely Low Income
Household, a monthly rent (including a reasonable utility allowance) that does not exceed thirty
percent (30%) of thirty percent (30%) of Median Income for a household size appropriate to the
Unit; for some Very Low Income Households specified herein, a monthly rent (including a
reasonable utility allowance) which does not exceed one -twelfth (1/12th) of thirty percent (30%)
of fifty percent (50%) of Median Income for a household size appropriate to the Unit; and for a
Low Income Household, a monthly rent (including reasonable utility allowance) which does not
exceed one -twelfth (1/12th) of thirty percent (30%) of sixty percent (60%) of Median Income for
a household size appropriate to the Unit.
Section 4. "Approved Housing Development" means all improvements as provided to
be developed by Developer under the Loan Agreement. The Approved Housing Development
must be completed in strict conformity with all specifications contained in or referred to in the
Loan Agreement.
Section 5. "Area" means the San Bernardino -Riverside Primary Metropolitan
Statistical Area, as periodically defined by HUD.
Section 6. "Certificate" or "Certification" is defined in Section 3(a).
Section 7. "City", as defined in the first paragraph hereof, means the City of Yucaipa,
a municipal corporation.
G-2
Section 8. "City Code" means and refers to the City of Temecula Municipal Code, as
revised from time to time.
Section 9. ""Common Areas" means all areas on the Site that are open or accessible to
all tenants of the Site (such as grounds, but excluding interiors of Units).
Section 10. `Extremely Low Income Household" means a household earning not
greater than the extremely low income limit for Riverside County, adjusted for household size,
pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 50106.
Section 11. "Household size appropriate to the unit" shall be two persons for a one
bedroom unit, three persons for a two bedroom unit, and four persons for a three bedroom unit.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the determination of Household size appropriate to the
unit set forth in this Section 11 conflicts with the determinatio of California Tax Credit Allocation
Committee ("CTCAC"), then CTCAC's determination shall control.
Section 12. Gross Income" means all payments from all sources received by a person
(together with the gross income of all persons of the age of 18 years or older who intend to reside
with such person in one residential unit) whether in cash or in kind as calculated pursuant to 25
California Code of Regulations Section 6914.
Section 13. "Low Income Household" or "Lower Income Household" means a
household earning not greater than the lower income household limit for Riverside County
described in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5 that is not a Very Low Income Household
or Extremely Low Income Household.
Section 14. "Low Income Unit" or "Lower Income Unit" means a Unit occupied at
Affordable Rent by a Low Income Household.
Section 15. "Median Income" or "Median Income for the Area" means the applicable
median income published at 25 California Code of Regulations Section 6932, as modified from
time to time.
Section 16. "Prescribed Income Levels" means the following:
Type Income of Household Number of Units
as Percentage of AMI
1BR/l BA 30% 5
1BR/1BA
50% 6
1BR/1BA
60% 4
2BR/lBA
30% 7
2BR/1BA
50% 6
2BR/1BA
60% 3
G-3
Type Income of Household Number of Units
as Percentage of AMI
3BR/2BA 50% 6
Section 17. "Regulatory Agreement" means this Regulatory Agreement and any
amendments, modifications or supplements.
Section 18. "Rental Development" means the seventy-seven (77) Unit residential rental
development on the Site.
Section 19. "Required Affordable Unit" means any of the thirty-seven (37) restricted of
the dwelling units in the Rental Development, as constructed under the Loan Agreement, and
available to, occupied by, or held vacant for occupancy only by tenants qualifying as Extemely
Low Income Households, Very Low Income Households and Low Income Households and to be
rented at Affordable Rent.
Section 20. "Required Covenant Period" means the period commencing on the date all
Required Affordable Units have been completed as evidenced by the City's issuance of a Final
Certificate of Occupancy for the Rental Development, and ending as of the fifty-fifth (55th)
anniversary thereof.
Section 21. "Site" means all of the real property and appurtenances as described in the
Recitals above, including all structures and other improvements thereon, and those hereafter
constructed.
Section 22. "Unit" means a dwelling unit on the Rental Development.
Section 23. "Very Low Income Households" means households earning not greater than
the very low income limit for Riverside County, adjusted for household size, pursuant to Health
and Safety Code Section 50105.
Section 24. "Very Low Income Unit" means a Unit occupied at Affordable Rent by a
Very Low Income Household.
Section 25. "Very Low Income Required Units" means the Required Affordable Units
which are required to be rented to Very Low Income Households at Affordable Rent for Very Low
Income Households.
Section 26. "Year" means a calendar year, excepting that the last Year hereunder shall
be deemed to end as of the expiration of this Regulatory Agreement.
ARTICLE II
LAND USE RESTRICTIONS; IMPROVEMENTS
Section 1. Uses. Developer shall develop the Approved Housing Development on the Site in
conformity with the Loan Agreement. Thereafter, the Site shall be operated as an Affordable
WWI
Housing Development and devoted only to the uses specified in the Loan Agreement and for the
period of time specified herein.
None of the units in the Rental Development shall at any time be utilized on a transient basis nor
shall the Rental Development or any portion thereof ever be used as a hotel, motel, dormitory,
fraternity or sorority house, rooming house, hospital, nursing home, sanitarium, rest home or
trailer court or park. No part of the Site, from the date Developer acquired the Site, has been or
will at any time be owned or used as a cooperative housing corporation or a community
apartment project or a stock cooperative.
Section 2. Affordable Housing.
Affordability Restrictions. Throughout the Required Covenant Period, the
Developer shall cause the Required Affordable Units to be rented in accordance with the
definition of "Prescribed Income Levels" in Section 18 at Affordable Rents.
Except to the extent prohibited by federal law, in the event a household's income
initially complies with the corresponding income restriction but the income of such household
increases, such increase shall not be deemed to result in a violation of the restrictions of this
Regulatory Agreement concerning limitations upon income of occupants, provided that the
occupancy by such household is for a reasonable time of not to exceed three hundred sixty-five
(365) days (measured from the time the income of the household ceases to qualify at the
designated affordability level). Developer shall include in its rental agreements provisions which
implement this requirement and limitation, and Developer shall expressly inform prospective
renters as to this limitation prior to the commencement of a tenancy.
Duration of Affordability Requirements. The restrictions shall apply throughout
the Required Covenant Period. All tenants residing in any Required Affordable Unit for which
rents are limited by virtue of this Regulatory Agreement or pursuant to other regulation during
the last two (2) Years of the Required Covenant Period shall be given notice by Developer at
least once every six (6) months prior to the expiration date of this requirement, that the rent
payable on such Required Affordable Unit may be raised to a market rate rent at the end of the
Required Covenant Period.
Selection of Tenants. Developer shall demonstrate to City that the proposed
tenants of the Required Affordable Unit of the Extremely Low Income Units constitute
Extremely Low Income Households; that the proposed tenants of Very Low Income Required
Units constitute Very Low Income Households; and that the proposed tenants of the Low Income
Required Units constitute Low Income Households.
Prior to the rental or lease of a Required Affordable Unit to a tenant, and as set
forth in this Section 2 of Article II of this Regulatory Agreement, Developer shall require the
tenant to execute a written lease and to complete an Income Verification certifying that the
tenant(s) occupying the Unit is/are in the appropriate income category. Developer shall verify
the income of the tenant(s).
Developer shall accept as tenants on the same basis as all other prospective
tenants, persons who are recipients of federal certificates for rent subsidies pursuant to the
existing program under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, or its successor.
Developer shall not apply selection criteria to Section 8 certificate holders which are more
burdensome than criteria applied to any other prospective tenants.
G-5
Determination of Affordable Rent for the Required Affordable Units. The
Required Affordable Units shall be rented or leased at Affordable Rent. The maximum monthly
rental for the Required Affordable Units shall be adjusted annually as permitted by Section
50053 of the California Health and Safety Code based on the annual adjustment to the Median
Income for the Area established pursuant to Section 50093 of the California Health and Safety
Code.
DEVELOPER UNDERSTANDS AND KNOWINGLY AGREES THAT THE
MAXIMUM RENTAL FOR THE REQUIRED AFFORDABLE UNITS ESTABLISHED BY
THE LOAN AGREEMENT, THIS REGULATORY AGREEMENT AND THE CITY GRANT
DEED IS SUBSTANTIALLY BELOW THE FAIR MARKET RENT FOR THE REQUIRED
AFFORDABLE UNITS.
Section 3. Developer Verification and Program Compliance.
Income Verification and Certification. Developer will obtain and maintain on file
an Income Verification from each tenant (for every Unit on the Site), dated immediately prior to
the initial occupancy of such tenant in the Required Affordable Unit.
On each June 30 following the completion of the Development, Developer shall
file with Authority or its designee a Certificate, containing all information required pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 33418. Each Certificate shall cover the immediately preceding
Year.
Developer shall maintain on file throughout the Required Covenant Period each
tenant's executed lease and Income Verification and rental records for the Required Affordable
Units. Developer shall maintain complete and accurate records pertaining to the Required
Affordable Units, and will permit any duly authorized representative of City to inspect the books
and records of Developer pertaining to the occupancy of the Required Affordable Units.
Developer shall prepare and submit to City annually by each June 30 throughout the Required
Covenant Period, a Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance. Such documentation shall
state for each Unit, the Unit size, the rental amount, the number of occupants, and the income of
the occupants and any other information which may be used to determined compliance with the
terms of this Regulatory Agreement.
In addition, as part of its annual report, at City's request, but not less frequently
than prior to each initial and subsequent rental of each Required Affordable Unit to a new tenant
household (but not lease renewals) and annually thereafter, Developer shall also provide to City
completed income computation, asset evaluation, and certification forms, for any such tenant or
tenants, in substantially the form provided by City from time to time. Developer shall obtain an
annual certification from each household of each Required Affordable Unit demonstrating that
such household is an Extremely Low Income Household, Very Low Income Household or Low
Income Household, as applicable. Developer shall verify the income certification of each tenant
household. Developer shall submit to City copies of any and all tenant income and occupancy
certifications upon request of City. City may request (and Developer shall provide) additional
documentation to assist City's evaluation of Developer's compliance with this Agreement, if
determined to be necessary in the reasonable discretion of the City Manager, specifically
including (without limitation) any documentation or additional certifications that may be
necessary to verify compliance with all requirements from all funding sources, and each tenant's
RMS
status as to each Required Affordable Unit. (This requirement is in addition to and does not
replace or supersede Developer's obligation to annually submit the Certificate of Continuing
Program Compliance to City.) Further, City has the right, but not the obligation to monitor
compliance with respect to each tenant household at the Rental Development, and City's election
to monitor some, but not all, of the Units shall not constitute a waiver of City's right to monitor
and enforce compliance with respect to all Units in the future.
Verification of Income of New and Continuing Tenants. Gross income
calculations for prospective (and continuing) tenants shall be determined in accordance with 25
Cal. Code Regs. Section 6914. Developer shall verify the income and information provided in
the income certification of the proposed tenant as set forth below.
(a) Developer shall verify the income of each proposed tenant of the
Required Affordable Units and by at least one of the following methods as appropriate to the
proposed tenant:
(i) obtain two (2) paycheck stubs from the person's two (2)
most recent pay periods;
(ii) obtain a true copy of an income tax return from the person
for the most recent tax year in which a return was filed;
(iii) obtain an income verification certification from the
employer of the person;
(iv) obtain an income verification certification from the Social
Security Administration and/or the California Department of Social Services if the person
receives assistance from such agencies; or
(v) obtain an alternate form of income verification reasonably
requested by Authority, if none of the above forms of verification is available to Developer.
Verification Regarding Eligibility of New Tenants. Developer shall retain
documentation regarding the eligibility of each new tenant household.
Reporting Amounts. In the event Developer fails to submit to City or its designee
the Certification as required by Section 3(a), Developer shall be in noncompliance with this
Regulatory Agreement.
Section 4. Management of the Rental Development.
Manager. The Rental Development shall at all times be managed by an
experienced manager (the "Manager") reasonably acceptable to the City, with demonstrated
ability to operate residential developments like the Rental Development in a manner that will
provide decent, safe, and sanitary housing. The Developer shall submit for the City's approval
the identity of any proposed Manager. The Developer shall also submit such additional
information about the background, experience and financial condition of any proposed Manager
as is reasonably necessary for the City to determine whether the proposed Manager meets the
standard for a qualified Manager set forth above. If the proposed Manager meets the standard
for a qualified Manager set forth above, the City shall approve the proposed Manager by
notifying Developer in writing.
CMA
Performance Review. The Developer shall cooperate with the City in an annual
review of management practices, in connection with which the City shall have the right to review
and approve the annual operations and management budget; provided, however, that the City
reserves the right to conduct reviews more frequently at its sole discretion. The purpose of each
annual review will be to enable the City to determine if the Improvements are being operated and
managed in accordance with the requirements and standards of this Agreement.
Replacement of Manager.
(i) If, as a result of the annual review, the City determines in its reasonable
judgment that the Improvements are not being operated and managed in accordance with any of
the requirements and standards of this Agreement, the City shall deliver notice to the Developer
of its intention to cause replacement of the Manager. Within fifteen (15) days of receipt by the
Developer of such written notice, the City and the Developer shall meet in good faith to consider
methods for improving the financial and operating status of the Rental Development, including,
without limitation, replacement of the Manager.
(ii) After such meeting, the Manager shall have a period of thirty (30) days to
cure or address any failure to comply with the requirements and standards of this Agreement, and
to the extent such failure cannot be cured within such thirty (30) day period but the Manager is
diligently pursuing the cure, the Manager shall have an additional 30 days to cure.
(iii) If, after cure period set forth above, the Manager failed to cure and the
City elects to proceed with the replacement of the Manager, the City shall so notify the
Developer of such decision in writing within fifteen (15) days following the expiration of the
cure period. Thereafter, the Developer shall appoint as the Manager a person or entity meeting
the standards for a Manager set forth in this section and approved by the City in its reasonable
discretion. City shall have the right to disapprove the replacement Manager within thirty (30)
days, and in such case Developer shall promptly dismiss the replacement Manager and appoint
another replacement Manager meeting the standards for a Manager set forth in this section and
approved by the City in its reasonable discretion. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City's
approval rights shall be subject and subordinate to the rights of senior lender under the senior
deed of trust.
(iv) Any contract for the operation or management of the Property entered into
by the Developer shall provide that the contract can be terminated as set forth above.
The Developer agrees that the Rental Development shall be preserved and
maintained throughout the term hereof in good condition and repair so as to provide decent, safe,
and sanitary housing, and in conformance with all applicable ordinances, statutes and regulations
promulgated by any governmental entity having jurisdiction over the Rental Development.
Annual Inspection. Subject to the rights of the occupants of the Units, City shall
have the right to perform an annual on -site inspection of the units, common areas and grounds
and to perform an annual tenant file review to ensure that Developer is managing the Rental
Development in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement.
Annual Budget. Developer shall submit or shall cause its Property Manager to
submit to the City Manager on or before November 30, and each anniversary thereof, an annual
C
budget for the ongoing operation of the Rental Development for approval by City, which will not
be unreasonably withheld. At the City's request, delivered within thirty (30) days after receipt of
the budget, each of Developer and the City shall cause its respective representative(s) to meet
within thirty (30) days following the receipt of request to review the budget. Such review is
without obligation to either party to propose or agree to any modification of permitted operating
expenses.
Management of Property. Developer shall be completely responsible for the
management, administration and operation of the Rental Development including, but not limited
to the hiring and discharge of employees, salaries and all other related Rental Development
expenses, maintenance and repairs, including capital expenditures, the financial operations of the
Rental Development, the rental and re -rental of the apartment units in accordance with the
occupancy requirements set forth in this Agreement and all operational, maintenance and
management responsibilities of an Developer in a typical multi -family residential housing Rental
Development.
Reserves. The Developer will maintain replacement reserves in accordance with
the Loan Agreement and will not withdraw funds from such reserves without the consent of the
City, which will not be unreasonably withheld, subject and subordinate to the rights of the senior
mortgage lender.
Manager's Failure to Perform. In the event the manager appointed by Developer
for management of the Rental Development fails to perform the obligations imposed upon
Developer by this Section, such failure shall constitute a default under Section 10 hereof, and if
Developer shall fail to cure such default as provided in Section 10 hereof, then City shall have
the right, in addition to any other remedies of City, to require Developer, upon thirty (30) days'
prior written notice, to appoint a substitute management City, reasonably acceptable to both City
and Developer, subject and subordinate to the rights of the senior mortgage lender.
Gross Mismanagement. During the Required Covenant Period, in the event of
"Gross Mismanagement" (as defined below) of the Development, any acts of Gross
Mismanagement shall cease immediately upon written notice from the City Manager, and any
omissions constituting Gross Mismanagement shall be corrected within thirty (30) days after
written notice from the City Manager. If such an act or omission is not timely ceased/cured,
then, Developer shall within sixty (60) days replace the Property Manager with a new property
manager reasonably acceptable to the City Manager, subject to the rights of the senior mortgage
lender.
For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Gross Mismanagement" means
management of the Development in a manner which materially violates the terms and/or
intention of this Agreement to operate a first quality affordable housing complex, and shall
include, but is not limited to, any one or more of the following:
(a) Leasing to tenants who exceed the prescribed income levels;
(b) Subject to fair housing laws, allowing tenants to exceed the
prescribed occupancy levels without taking immediate action to stop such overcrowding;
(c) Under -funding required reserve accounts;
(d) Failing to submit timely and/or adequate annual reports to
Authority as required herein;
Cep
(e) Failing to comply with this Regulatory Agreement;
(f) Fraud or embezzlement of funds, including without limitation
funds in the reserve accounts;
(g) Failing to fully cooperate with the Temecula Police Department or
other local law enforcement agency(ies) with jurisdiction over the Development, in maintaining
a crime -free environment within the Development;
(h) Failing to fully cooperate with the Temecula Fire Department or
other local public safety agency(ies) with jurisdiction over the Development, in maintaining a
safe and accessible environment within the Development; and
(i) Failing to fully cooperate with the Temecula Planning and
Building and Safety Department, or other local health and safety enforcement agency(ies) with
jurisdiction over the Development, in maintaining a decent, safe and sanitary environment within
the Development.
Developer is obligated and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to correct
any defects in property management or operations at the earliest feasible time.
Code Enforcement. Developer acknowledges and agrees that City and its
employees and authorized agents, shall have the right to conduct code compliance and/or code
enforcement inspections of the Development and the individual dwelling units at the
Development (and not limited to the Required Affordable Units), both exterior and interior, at
reasonable times and upon reasonable notice (not less than 48 hours prior notice, except in an
emergency) to Developer and/or an individual tenant. If such notice is provided by Authority
representative(s) to Developer, then Developer shall immediately and directly advise any
affected tenant of such upcoming inspection and cause access to the area(s) and/or Units at the
Rental Development to be made available and open for inspection. Developer shall include
express advisement of such inspection rights within the lease/rental agreements for each Unit in
the Development in order for each and every tenant and tenant household to be aware of this
inspection right. The foregoing portion of this Section 5 is without limitation as to the exercise
of police powers by City.
Section 6. Keeping of Animals. No animals of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on the
Site, except that domesticated dogs, cats or other household pets may be kept by the tenants in
the Rental Development at the discretion of Developer and subject to compliance with all laws.
However, no animal shall be kept, bred or maintained for any commercial purpose or for fighting
purposes. Nothing permitted herein shall derogate in any way the right of Developer to further
restrict keeping of pets.
Section 7. Parking of Vehicles. Developer shall not permit the parking, storing or keeping
of any vehicle except wholly within the parking areas designated for the Required Affordable
Units. Developer shall not permit the parking, storing or keeping of any large commercial type
vehicle (dump truck, cement mixer truck, oil or gas truck, etc.), or any recreational vehicle over
twenty (20) feet in length (camper unit, motor home, trailer, mobile home or other similar
vehicle), boats over twenty (20) feet in length, or any vehicle other than a private passenger
vehicle, upon any portion of the Common Areas, including parking spaces. For purposes of this
section, a pickup truck with a pickup bed mounted camper shall be considered a private
G-10
passenger vehicle; provided however, that no such vehicle shall be used for residential purposes
while parked on the premises.
Developer shall not permit major repairs or major restorations of any motor vehicle, boat, trailer,
aircraft or other vehicle to be conducted upon any portion of the Common Area, including the
parking areas, except for emergency repairs thereto and then only to the extent necessary to
enable movement of the vehicle to a proper repair facility. No inoperable vehicle shall be stored
or kept in the Common Area. Developer shall give the vehicle owner not less than four (4) days,
nor more than seven (7) days' notice and an opportunity to remove any vehicle parked, stored or
kept in violation of the provisions of this Regulatory Agreement. Notice shall consist minimally
of a reasonably diligent attempt to personally notify the vehicle owner or alternatively leaving
written notice on the subject vehicle. After due notice and opportunity have been given to the
vehicle owner, Developer shall have the right to remove, at the vehicle owner's expense, any
vehicle parked, stored or kept in violation of the provisions of this Regulatory Agreement.
Section 8. Maximum Occupancies. No persons shall be permitted to occupy any Apartment
within the Rental Development in excess of applicable limit of maximum occupancy set by the
City Code and the laws of the State of California.
Section 9. Signs Required. "No loitering" signs will be posted at each building and enforced
by Developer. "Illegally parked vehicles will be towed" signs in compliance with California
Vehicle Code requirements will be posted and enforced by Developer.
Section 10. Fences and Electronic Installations. Developer shall not install or knowingly
permit to be installed on the exterior of any improvement or building on any fences or any
antenna or other television or radio receiving device, excepting satellite dishes having a diameter
of eighteen inches (18") or less, without prior written consent of City. This prohibition shall not
prohibit the installation of cable television or subscription wires or receiving devices.
Section 11. Structural Change. Nothing shall be done on the Site in, on or to any building
which would materially structurally change the exterior or the interior bearing walls of any such
building or structure without the prior written consent of the City and any such changes shall be
in compliance with all applicable laws including any required permits and ordinances of the City.
Nothing herein shall affect the rights of Developer to repair, alter or construct improvements on
the buildings on the Site unless such repair, alteration or improvement would impair the
structural integrity and/or exterior appearance of said buildings. Nothing herein shall be deemed
to prohibit work ordered to be performed by the City building official.
Section 12. Compliance with Laws. Developer shall comply with all applicable laws in
connection with the development and use of the Site, including without limitation the Fair
Housing Act (42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq., and 24 C.F.R. § 100.300, et seq). Developer is a
sophisticated party, with substantial experience in the acquisition, development, financing,
obtaining financing for, marketing, and operation of affordable housing projects, and with the
negotiation, review, and preparation of agreements and other documents in connection with such
activities. Developer is familiar with and has reviewed all laws and regulations pertaining to the
acquisition, development and operation of the Rental Development and has obtained advice from
any advisers of its own choosing in connection with this Agreement.
G-11
ARTICLE III
DUTIES OF DEVELOPER: SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES
Section 1. Exterior Building Maintenance. All exterior, painted surfaces shall be maintained
at all times in a clean and presentable manner, free from chipping, cracking and defacing marks.
Any such defacing marks shall be cleaned or removed within a reasonable period of time as set
forth herein.
Section 2. Front and Side Exteriors. Developer shall at all times maintain the front exterior
and yard in a clean, safe and presentable manner, free from defacing marks or any disrepair and
any visible side exteriors. Developer shall hire maintenance personnel to maintain and/or repair
any front exterior or yard or visible side yard and exterior of any lot or building.
Section 3. Graffiti Removal. All graffiti, and defacement of any type, including marks,
words and pictures must be removed and any necessary painting or repair completed by the later
to occur of (i) seventy-two (72) hours of their creation or (ii) seventy-two (72) hours after notice
to Developer.
Section 4. Driveways. All driveways must be paved and maintained with impervious
material in accordance with the City Code. In addition, all water must be made to drain freely to
the public part of the waterway without any pooling.
Section 5. Exterior Illumination. Developer shall at all times maintain adequate lighting in
all entrance ways and parking areas. Adequate lighting means outdoor, night lighting designed
and installed, which provides no less than one (1.0) foot candles in the parking areas and no less
than one and one-half (1-1 /2) foot candles in the walking areas or common areas and no less than
0.2 foot candles at the point of least illumination.
Section 6. Front Setbacks. All front setback areas that are not buildings, driveways or
walkways shall be adequately and appropriately landscaped in accordance with minimum
standards established by City and shall be maintained by Developer. The landscaping shall meet
minimum standards set from time to time by City.
Section 7. Trash Bins. All trash shall be collected and placed at all times in an enclosable
bin to be placed in a designated refuse/trash bin area. The designated area shall be located so
that the bin will, to the extent possible, be readily accessible from the street.
Section 8. Prohibited Signs. No sign of any kind shall be displayed to the public view on or
from any portion of the Site without the approval of City and appropriate City departments, if
any such approval is required by the City Code.
ARTICLE IV
OBLIGATION TO MAINTAIN, REPAIR AND REBUILD
Section 1. Maintenance. If, at any time, Developer fails to maintain the Rental Development
or any portion thereof, and said condition is not corrected after the expiration of forty-five (45)
days from the date of written notice from City to both Developer and its limited partner., City
may perform the necessary maintenance and Developer shall pay such costs as are reasonably
incurred for such maintenance. Payment shall be due within fifteen (15) days of receipt of an
invoice from City.
G-12
City hereby agrees that any cure of any default made or tendered by Developer's limited partners
who shall have been identified in writing by Developer to City and shall be deemed to be a cure
by Developer and shall be accepted or rejected on the same basis as if made or tendered by
Developer; provided City shall have received written notice by Developer of the identity of, and
address for notices for, such limited partners and a copy of the applicable limited partnership
agreement and amendments showing they are limited partners.
Developer agrees to assume full responsibility for the operation and maintenance
of the Rental Development throughout the Required Covenant Period without expense to City,
and to perform all repairs and replacements necessary to maintain and preserve the Rental
Development and the Site in good repair, in a neat, clean, safe and orderly condition reasonably
satisfactory to City and in compliance with all applicable laws. Developer agrees that City shall
not be required to perform any maintenance, repairs or services or to assume any expense in
connection with the Rental Development and the Site. Developer hereby waives all rights to
make repairs or to cause any work to be performed at the expense of City as provided for in
Section 1941 and 1942 of the California Civil Code.
The following standards shall be complied with by Developer and its maintenance
staff, contractors or subcontractors:
(1) Developer shall maintain the Rental Development, including individual
Required Affordable Units, all common areas, all interior and exterior facades, and all exterior
project site areas, in a safe and sanitary fashion suitable for a high quality, rental housing project.
Developer agrees to provide utility services, administrative services, supplies, contract services,
maintenance, maintenance reserves, and management for the entire project including interior
tenant spaces, common area spaces and exterior common areas. The services provided by
Developer shall include, but not be limited to, providing all common area electricity, gas, water,
property, fire and liability insurance in the amounts set forth in this Regulatory Agreement, all
property taxes and personal property taxes, any and all assessments, maintenance and
replacement of all exterior landscaping, and all administration and overhead required for any
property manager.
(2) Landscape maintenance shall include, but not be limited to:
watering/irrigation; fertilization; mowing, edging, and trimming of grass; tree and shrub pruning;
trimming and shaping of trees and shrubs to maintain a healthy, natural appearance and safe road
conditions and visibility, and optimum irrigation coverage; replacement, as needed, of all plant
materials; control of weeds in all planters, shrubs, lawns, ground covers, or other planted areas;
and staking for support of trees.
(3) Clean-up maintenance shall include, but not be limited to: maintenance of
all private paths, parking areas, driveways and other paved areas in clean and weed -free
condition; maintenance of all such areas clear of dirt, mud, trash, debris or other matter which is
unsafe or unsightly; removal of all trash, litter and other debris from improvements and
landscaping prior to mowing; clearance and cleaning of all areas maintained prior to the end of
the day on which the maintenance operations are performed to ensure that all cuttings, weeds,
leaves and other debris are properly disposed of by maintenance workers.
(4) The Rental Development shall be maintained in conformance and in
compliance with the approved construction and architectural plans and design scheme, as the
same may be amended from time to time with the approval of City.
G-13
(5) All maintenance work shall conform to all applicable federal and state
Occupational Safety and Health Act standards and regulations for the performance of
maintenance.
(6) Any and all chemicals, unhealthful substances, and pesticides used in and
during maintenance shall be applied only by persons in strict accordance with all governing
regulations.
(7) Parking lots, lighting fixtures, trash enclosures, and all areas shall be kept
free from any accumulation of debris or waste materials by regularly scheduled maintenance.
Section 2. Damage and Destruction Affecting Development - Developer's Duty to Rebuild.
If all or any portion of the Site and the improvements thereon is damaged or destroyed by fire or
other casualty, Developer shall promptly proceed to obtain insurance proceeds and subject to the
terms of the senior loan secured by the Site and improvements, take all steps necessary to begin
reconstruction and, immediately upon receipt of insurance proceeds, to promptly and diligently
commence the repair or replacement of the Rental Development to substantially the same
condition as the Rental Development is required to be constructed pursuant to the Loan
Agreement, subject to the sufficiency of the insurance proceeds to cover the actual cost of repair,
replacement, or restoration, and Developer shall complete the same as soon as possible thereafter
so that the Rental Development can be occupied as an affordable housing project in accordance
with the Loan Agreement. In no event shall the repair, replacement, or restoration period exceed
eighteen (18) months from the date Developer obtains insurance proceeds unless the City
Manager, in his or her reasonable discretion, approves a longer period of time, subject to the
terms of the senior loan secured by the Site and improvements. If the then -existing laws of any
other governmental agencies with jurisdiction over the Site do not permit the repair, replacement,
or restoration, Developer may elect not to repair, replace, or restore the Rental Development by
giving notice to City (in which event the insurance proceeds shall be treated as Residual Receipts
and shall be distributed to the Parties in accordance with the terms of the City Loan Promissory
Note entered pursuant to the Loan Agreement, and Developer shall be required to remove all
debris from the Site) or Developer may reconstruct such other Rental Development on the Site as
is consistent with applicable land use regulations and approved by City, and any other
governmental agency or agencies with jurisdiction, and City may pursue remedies of its choosing
under this Agreement, including without limitation termination of the Loan Agreement and
accelerating the payment of the City Loan in accordance with the terms of the City Loan
Promissory Note.
In furtherance of the requirements of this Section 2, Developer shall keep the construction on the
Site insured by carriers at all times reasonably satisfactory to City against loss by fire and such
other hazards, casualties, liabilities and contingencies as included within an all risk extended
coverage hazard insurance policy, in an amount of the full replacement cost of the constructions.
In the event of loss, Developer shall give prompt notice to the insurance carrier and to Authority.
If the Site is abandoned by Developer, or if Developer fails to respond to City within thirty (30)
days from the date notice is mailed by City to Developer that the insurance carrier offers to settle
a claim for insurance benefits, City is authorized to collect and apply the insurance proceeds at
City's option either to restoration or repair of the Site.
Section 3. Variance in Exterior Appearance and Design. In the event the Rental
Development sustains substantial physical damage due to a casualty event, Developer may apply
G-14
to City for approval to reconstruct, rebuild or repair in a manner which will provide different
exterior appearance and lot design from that which existed prior to the date of the casualty.
Section 4. Time Limitation. Upon damage to the Site or the Rental Development or other
improvements, Developer shall be obligated to proceed with all due diligence hereunder and
commence reconstruction within two (2) months after the damage occurs and complete
reconstruction within six (6) months after damage occurs or demolition and vacate within two (2)
months, unless prevented by causes beyond their reasonable control, in which event
reconstruction shall be commenced and completed at the earliest feasible time.
ARTICLE V
ENFORCEMENT
Section 1. Remedies. Breach of the covenants contained in the Regulatory Agreement may
be enjoined, abated or remedied by appropriate legal proceeding by City. No remedies shall be
instituted until the party complaining of a violation has provided written notice to the other party
and such party has failed to cure the alleged violation within thirty (30) days of receipt of the
written notice. City hereby agrees that any cure of any default made or tendered by Developer's
limited partners who shall have been identified in writing by Developer to City and shall be
deemed to be a cure by Developer and shall be accepted or rejected on the same basis as if made
or tendered by Developer; provided City shall have received written notice by Developer of the
identity of, and address for notices for, such limited partners and a copy of the applicable limited
partnership agreement and amendments showing they are limited partners.
This Regulatory Agreement does not in any way infringe on the right or duties of City to enforce
any of the provisions of the City Code including, but not limited to, the abatement of dangerous
buildings.
A default hereunder may constitute a default under the Loan Agreement and the Loan described
therein.
Section 2. Nuisance. The result of every act or omission whereby any of the covenants
contained in this Regulatory Agreement are violated in whole or in part is hereby declared to be
and constitutes a nuisance, and every remedy allowable at law or equity, against a nuisance,
either public or private, shall be applicable against every such result and may be exercised by
any owner or its successors in interest, without derogation of City's rights under law.
Section 3. Right of Entry. In addition to the above general rights of enforcement, City shall
have the right through its agents and employees, to enter upon any part of the project area for the
purpose of enforcing the California Vehicle Code, and the ordinances and other regulations of
City, and for maintenance and/or repair of any or all publicly owned utilities. In addition, City
has the right of entry at reasonable hours and upon and after reasonable attempts to contact
Developer, on any lot to effect emergency repairs or maintenance which Developer has failed to
perform. Subsequent to sixty (60) days written notice to Developer specifically outlining
Developer's noncompliance, City shall have the right of entry on the Site at reasonable hours to
enforce compliance with this Regulatory Agreement which Developer has failed to perform.
This Section 3 is without limitation as to the exercise of police powers of City.
Section 4. Costs of Repair. The costs borne by City for any such repairs or maintenance
emergency and/or non -emergency, shall become a charge for which Developer shall be
responsible.
G-15
Section 5. Cumulative Remedies. The remedies herein provided for breach of the covenants
contained in this Regulatory Agreement shall be deemed cumulative, and none of such remedies
shall be deemed exclusive.
Section 6. Failure to Enforce. The failure to enforce any of the covenants contained in this
Regulatory Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the right to enforce the same thereafter.
Section 7. Enforcement and Nonliability. City may from time to time make such efforts, if
any, as it shall deem appropriate enforce and/or assist in enforcing this Regulatory Agreement.
However, City will not be subject to any liability for failure to affirmatively enforce any
provision of this Regulatory Agreement.
ARTICLE VI
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 1. Covenant Against Partition. By acceptance of its interest in the Site, Developer
shall be deemed to covenant for itself and for its heirs, representatives, successors and assigns,
that it will not institute legal proceedings or otherwise seek to effect partition of its right and
interest in the interest being conveyed to Developer, or the burdens running with the land as a
result of this Regulatory Agreement.
Section 2. Severability. Invalidation of any one of these covenants or restrictions by
judgment or court order shall in no way affect any other provisions which shall remain in all
force and effect.
Section 3. Term. This Regulatory Agreement shall run with and bind the interest of
Developer in the Site, and shall inure to the owner(s) of any property subject to this Regulatory
Agreement, his legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, and as provided in Article VI,
Sections 2 and 3, be enforceable by City, for a term equal to the Required Covenant Period as
defined herein, provided; however, that the covenants regarding nondiscrimination set forth in
Section 4 of Article II of this Regulatory Agreement shall remain in effect for perpetuity. This
Regulatory Agreement shall not be subordinate to the lien of any financing obtained by
Developer with respect to the Site.
Section 4. Construction. The provisions of this Regulatory Agreement shall be liberally
construed to effectuate its purpose of creating a uniform plan for the development and operation
of the Required Affordable Units available at Affordable Rent for Very Low Income
Households, and, to the extent provided herein, Low Income Households in conformity with the
Prescribed Income Levels. The article and section headings have been inserted for convenience
only, and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of interpretation or
construction.
Section 5. Amendments. This Regulatory Agreement may be amended only by the written
agreement of Developer and City.
Section 6. Encroachments. None of the rights and obligations of Developer created herein
shall be altered in any way by encroachments due to settlement or shifting of structures or any
other cause. There shall be valid easements for the maintenance of said encroachments so long
as they shall exist; provided, however, that in no event shall a valid easement for encroachment
be created in favor of Developer if said encroachment occurs due to the willful conduct of said
Developer.
Cull
Section 7. Notices. Any notice permitted or required to be delivered as provided herein to
Developer shall be in writing and may be delivered either by reputable overnight service or
certified mail to its address on the first page hereof, and shall be effective as of one business day
after delivery to the messenger service for overnight delivery, or the date of delivery or
attempted delivery shown on the return receipt. Such address may be changed from time to time
by notice in writing.
Section 8. Notice of Transfer of Title; Notice of Property Manager. Developer shall
promptly notify City in writing of the identity and address for notices for the initial Property
Manager and any replacement thereof, and Developer shall also promptly notify the City in
writing of any conveyance of the Approved Housing Development, including the name of any
buyer and the address for notices of the buyer.
DEVELOPER:
CITY:
CITY OF TEMECULA,
a municipal corporation
By:
Print Name:
Title:
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
G-17
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE
Real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as
follows:
I
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of
the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the
truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of
On , before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
(Seal)
G-19
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of
the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the
truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of
On , before me,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
(Seal)
G-20
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of
the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the
truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of California
County of
On , before me,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument
the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
(Seal)
G-21
EXHIBIT "H"
SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
Action
Date / Deadline
Items 1— 9 Relate to Developer Actions and Requirements Prior to the Closing
1.
Project Budget. The Developer shall
Prior and as a condition to Closing.
submit a comprehensive Project Budget
for the Improvements.
2.
Final Plans and Specifications. The
Prior and as a condition to Closing.
Developer shall submit the Final Plans
and Specifications for City approval.
3.
Building Permits. The Developer shall
Prior and as a condition to the Closing.
obtain the Building Permit for the
construction of the Improvements.
4.
Construction Contract. The Developer
Prior and as a condition to the Closing.
shall submit the Stipulated Sum
construction contract for the
construction of the Improvements to the
City for approval.
5.
Performance and Payment Bonds. The
Prior and as a condition to the Closing.
Developer shall deliver to the City
copies of the required performance and
payment bonds, or security in lieu
thereof.
6.
Insurance. The Developer shall submit
Prior and as a condition to the Closing.
evidence of insurance to the City.
H-1
Action
Date / Deadline
7. Tax Credit Applications/Award.
Developer must apply for 9% tax credits in the
second round for 2020, both rounds in 2021 and
both round in 2022 (until awarded) and must
provide evidence thereof to City, and form a
limited partnership to provide for investment of
tax credit -based equity, and deliver a copy of the
partnership agreement to City for approval.
Developer must be awarded tax credits and must
provide evidence thereof to City prior (and as a
condition) to Closing. In addition, in the event
Developer is unsuccessful at securing 9% tax
credits, the Developer shall have the option to
pursue 4% tax credits during 2020, 2021 and
2022 as an alternative.
8. Tax Credit Equity. All tax credit equity
Prior and as a condition to Closing.
must have been committed and
available to pay the initial Project costs,
as shown by reasonable evidence
delivered to City.
Items 10 —14 Relate to Requirements After the Closing
9. Closing. The Developer shall close the
Within one (1) month after award of tax credits,
City Loan.
but not later than December 31, 2022.
10. Commencement of Construction.
No later than 30 days after the Closing.
Developer shall substantially
commence the Improvements.
11. Completion of Grading. Developer
Not later than six (6) months following the
shall substantially complete the grading
commencement of construction.
for the Project.
12. Commencement of Vertical
Not later than eight (8) month after the
Construction. Developer shall
commencement of construction.
commence vertical construction.
13. Completion; Qualification for
No later than eighteen (18) months after the
Certificate of Completion. The Project
commencement of construction.
shall be completed and shall qualify for
a Certificate of Completion.
H-2
Item No. 11
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve a Resolution to Amend the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
(TUMF) Program
PREPARED BY: Ron Moreno, Senior Civil Engineer
Anissa Sharp, Office Specialist II
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF)
APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF
TEMECULA
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a Member Jurisdiction of the Western
Riverside Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the County
of Riverside and eighteen (18) cities located in Western Riverside County. Acting in concert, in
2002-2003, WRCOG member jurisdictions developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed
to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials due to new development
in Western Riverside County could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation
Fee ("TUMF") on future residential, commercial, and industrial development. As a member
jurisdiction of WRCOG and as a TUMF participating jurisdiction, the City of Temecula
participated in the preparation of a certain "Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee
Nexus Study" ("2002 Nexus Study") later adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee. Based
on the 2002 Nexus Study, the City of Temecula adopted and implemented an ordinance authorizing
the City's participation in a TUMF Program.
Pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code § § 66000 et seq.), WRCOG prepared a new Nexus
Study ("2016 Nexus Study") to update the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG Executive
Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and recommended TUMF participating jurisdictions
update their fees by amending their applicable TUMF Ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF
Network and the cost of construction.
As written in the TUMF Administration Plan, WRCOG is required to report yearly on the
Construction Cost Index (CCI) and provide information regarding cost increases. Based upon the
CCI data provided by WRCOG, construction costs increased by approximately 5%. The WRCOG
Public Works, Technical Advisory, and Administration & Finance Committees all approved
adjusting the TUMF fees to account for CCI increase. On November 4, 2019, the TUMF CCI
adjustment was approved by the WRCOG Executive Committee.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Temecula's existing ordinance provides the legal basis
for a revised TUMF schedule. The actual TUMF schedule will be established by resolution of the
City Council.
The attached resolution will establish the Fee Schedule for TUMF as follows:
A. There is hereby adopted the following TUMF schedule:
(1) $9,146.00 per single family residential unit
(2) $6,134.00 per multi -family residential unit
(3) $1.77 per square foot of an industrial project
(4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project
(5) $4.56 per square foot of a service commercial project
(6) $2.19 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office
B. For single-family residential, multi -family residential and non-residential projects,
the revised fees set shall be phased in as follows:
From July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, the fee schedule shall be as follows:
(1) $9,478.00 per single family residential unit
(2) $6,389.00 per multi -family residential unit
(3) $1.81 per square foot of an industrial project
(4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project
(5) $4.75 per square foot of a service commercial project
(6) $2.38 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office
From January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021, the fee schedule shall be as follows:
(1) $9,810.00 per single family residential unit
(2) $6,389.00 per multi -family residential unit
(3) $1.81 per square foot of an industrial project
(4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project
(5) $4.75 per square foot of a service commercial project
(6) $2.38 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
(TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE
CITY OF TEMECULA
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula ("City") is a member agency of the Western Riverside
Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of
Riverside and eighteen cities located in Western Riverside County; and
WHEREAS, the member agencies of WRCOG recognized that there was insufficient
funding to address the impacts of new development on the regional system of highways and
arterials in Western Riverside County (the "Regional System"); and
WHEREAS, in order to address this shortfall, the member agencies formulated a plan
whereby a transportation mitigation fee would be assessed on new development and would be
used to fund the necessary improvements for the Regional System; and
WHEREAS, WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Program participating jurisdictions,
has prepared an updated Nexus Study entitled "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus
Study: 2016 Update" ("2016 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code sections
66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On July 10, 2017,
the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and
recommended TUMF participating jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to
reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF
Program; and
WHEREAS, consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of Resolution No.
17-47 the City Council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds, that if the capacity of
the Regional System is not enlarged and unless development contributes to the cost of improving
the Regional System, the result will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of Western
Riverside County, with unacceptable Levels of Service. Furthermore, the failure to mitigate
growing traffic impacts on the Regional System will substantially impair the ability of public
safety services (police and fire) to respond and, thus, adversely affect the public health, safety
and welfare. Therefore, continuation of a TUMF Program is essential; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational
relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the
fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation improvements that
are necessary for the safety, health, and welfare of the residential and non-residential users of the
development in which the TUMF will be levied; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational
relationship between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of
development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the
residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional system.
Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such
developments will be mitigated in part by payment of the TUMF; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the
new 2016 Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System
improvements and the facilities that compromise the Regional System, and that the amount of
the TUMF expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share cost
to such development; and
WHEREAS, the fees collected pursuant to the TUMF Ordinance shall be used to help
pay for the design, planning, construction of and real property acquisition for the Regional
System improvements and its facilities as identified in the 2016 Nexus Study. The need for the
improvements and facilities is related to new development because such development results in
additional traffic and creates the demand for the improvements;
WHEREAS, section 15.08.040 (A) of the TUMF Ordinance authorizes periodic review
and adjustment to the applicable TUMF in accordance with any adjustments made by the
WRCOG Executive Committee; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2019, the WRCOG Executive Committee approved the
CCI adjustment based upon the annual change in Construction Cost Index (CCI) as described in
the TUMF Administrative Plan.
WHEREAS, the fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the
public facilities described or identified in the Nexus Study; and
WHEREAS, the levying of TUMF has been reviewed by the City Council and staff in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines
and it has been determined that the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to
Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings in
support of this Resolution. In addition, the City Council re -adopts the findings contained in
Section 15.08.040 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code in support of the adjusted TUMF
contained herein.
SECTION 2. TUMF Schedule. In accordance with Section 15.08.040 (A) of the
Temecula Municipal Code, there is hereby adopted the following fee schedule for the TUMF
which replaces the fee schedule set forth in Section 2 of Resolution No. 17-47 in its entirety as of
May 26, 2020.
N
A. There is hereby adopted the following TUMF schedule:
(1) $9,146.00 per single-family residential unit
(2) $6,134.00 per multi -family residential unit
(3) $1.77 per square foot of an industrial project
(4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project
(5) $4.56 per square foot of a service commercial project
(6) $2.19 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office
B. For single-family residential, multi -family residential, and non-residential
projects, the fees set forth in Section 2.A. shall be phased in as follows:
From July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, the fee schedule shall be as follows:
(1) $9,478.00 per single family residential unit
(2) $6,389.00 per multi -family residential unit
(3) $1.81 per square foot of an industrial project
(4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project
(5) $4.75 per square foot of a service commercial project
(6) $2.38 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office
From January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021, the fee schedule shall be as follows:
(1) $9,810.00 per single family residential unit
(2) $6,389.00 per multi -family residential unit
(3) $1.81 per square foot of an industrial project
(4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project
(5) $4.75 per square foot of a service commercial project
(6) $2.38 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office
SECTION 3. CEQA Findings. The City Council hereby finds that in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines the adoption of
this Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3).
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become on July 1, 2020.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26th day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 261h day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Item No. 12
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve Tract Maps and Subdivision Improvement and Monumentation
Agreements for Sommers Bend and Authorize the City Manager to Execute Related
Documents
PREPARED BY: Ron Moreno, Senior Civil Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Approve Tract Map 37341-11, 37341-12, 37341-13, 37341-14, 37341-15 and 37341-
16 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
2. Approve the Subdivision Improvement and Monumentation Agreements with the
Developer;
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map 37341-11, 37341-12, 37341-13, 37341-14, 37341-15 and
37341-16 have been approved for subdivision purposes to create 262 residential lots on 98.5 acres,
including a Recreation Center, for Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, now known as "Sommers Bend".
The property covered by these Tract Maps is located on the east side of Butterfield Stage Road
between Calle Chapos and Murrieta Hot Springs Road.
The Tract Maps subdivide Lots 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 18 of Tract Map number 37368, as filed in
Book 468, Page 89 through 98, inclusive, of maps, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside,
State of California, lying within section 21, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bernardino
Meridian.
Securities have been posted for the public improvements and monumentation as conditioned by
the approval of Tentative Map 37341-11, 37341-12, 37341-13, 37341-14, 37341-15 and 37341-
16 by the Planning Commission on June 20, 2018.
The property owner/developer has met the terms of the Conditions of Approval for map
recordation, and this Tract Map is in conformance with the approved Tentative Tract Map. The
approval of a Subdivision Map, which substantially complies with the approved Tentative Tract
Map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law.
All fees have been paid.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fees and Securities Report
2. Vicinity Map
3. Tract Maps 37341-11-16
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP 37341-11, 37341-12, 37341-13, 37341-14, 37341-15, 37341-16
Date: March 26t". 2020
TRACT
FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
LABOR &
MATERIALS
SECURITY
MONUMENTATION
SECURITY
37341-11
$2,214,000
$1,107,000
$12,965
37341-12
$1,640,500
$820,250
$9,065
37341-13
$1,760,000
$880,000
$9,265
37341-14
$2,467,500
$1,233,750
$24,685
37341-15
$1,618,500
$809,250
$14,300
37341-16
$2,348,500
$1,174,250
$22,775
AULD RD �
0
MURRIETA HOT �p
SPRINGS �D �oJ S/TE
79
NZCC\-p,S RD cn o0
� C
CANTRELL D —'
RD "M
mm
15 LA SERENA o
WAY F-
0
MARGARITA
R D
APO MEADOWS
PKWY
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
1770 IOWAAVENUE - SUITE 100
RIVERSIDE, CA 92507 VICINITY M A P
951.782.0707
(FAX)951.782.0723
ENGINEERING COMPANY rickengineering.com C
Riverside San Diego - Orange - San LuisObispo- Bakersfield - Sacramento - Phoenix - Tucson SCALE: N.T.J. DATE, MAY 9, 2019
0
G:\17883\17883 AM - Survey-Mapping\Survey\FinalMap\17883exb02-VicinityMap.dgn PLOT DATE: 09-MAY-2019 JN 17883
TOTAL NUMBERED LOTS: 33
TOTAL LETTERED LOTS: 4
TOTAL NET AREA: 9.718 ACRES
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 12.310 ACRES
OWNER'S STATEMENT
WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY
PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO
SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS
SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: LOTS "A"
THROUGH "D", INCLUSIVE. FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER
WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES
AS SHOWN HEREON.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG
SOMMERS BEND TO THE PUBLIC. THE OWNERS OF LOT 30 AND LOT 32
ABUTTING THIS HIGHWAY AND DURING SUCH TIME WILL HAVE NO RIGHTS
OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERAL EASEMENT OF TRAVEL. ANY CHANGE OF
ALIGNMENT OR WIDTH THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION THEREOF SHALL
TERMINATE THIS DEDICATION AS TO THE PART VACATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,,
37341-11
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS
CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE
INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,
ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
ON BEFORE ME,
NOTARY PUBLIC PERSONALLY APPEARED
A
3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 29, WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE
INCLUSIVE, AND LOTS 30 THROUGH 32, INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN HEREON. THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN
THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED
THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT
BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S),
WE HEREBY RETAIN LOTS "A" THROUGH "D" INDICATED AS "PRIVATE OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED,
STREET" FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN LOTS 30, 31 AND 33 INDICATED AS "LANDSCAPE" STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE
FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR AND CORRECT.
SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN LOT 32 INDICATED AS "BASIN" FOR SIGNATURE
PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS,
ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE BLANKET DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER ALL
OF LOT 32 FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES,
OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT
FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
("DISTRICT"), A PUBLIC AGENCY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER
AND BY VIRTUE OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT LAW OF 1911,
ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF
WAY TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, ENLARGE, RECONSTRUCT, REMOVE AND
REPLACE, OPERATE, INSPECT, REPAIR, IMPROVE AND RELOCATE SEWER,
WATER, AND RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES, ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND DESIGNATED "SEWER, WATER, AND
RECYCLED WATER EASEMENT" HEREON, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT
OF ACCESS TO AND FROM SAID EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXERCISING THE RIGHTS GRANTED IN SAID EASEMENT. OWNER RETAINS
THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENT AREA PROVIDED THAT OWNER SHALL
NOT CONSTRUCT OR ERECT BUILDINGS, MASONRY WALLS, MASONRY
FENCES AND OTHER STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS, OR PLANT OR
GROW TREES OR SHRUBS, OR CHANGE THE SURFACE GRADE OR INSTALL
PRIVATELY -OWNED PIPELINES WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT
OF DISTRICT.
OWNER:
WOODS I DE 05S, LP,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
IN
NAME: CHRIS CHAMBERS
TITLE: VICE PRESIDENT, WDS GP, INC.
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
AS GENERAL PARTNER
NAME-
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE
PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS:
COMMISSION EXPIRES:
COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, BY ITS CITY CLERK, RANDI JOHL, HEREBY
APPROVES THE TRACT MAP AND ACCEPTS THE OFFER
OF DEDICATION OF LOTS "A" THROUGH "D" MADE HEREON
FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF
INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY AND SERVICE VEHICLES.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF ABUTTERS
RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG SOMMERS BEND AS DEDICATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE 3' PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT AS DEDICATED.
DATED:
2020
BY:
RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK, CITY OF TEMECULA
SOILS REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66490 OF THE
STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, A PRELIMINARY SOILS
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF CA. PROJECT NO. 10967.108
ON JUNE 25, 2018, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECLULA.
APRIL 2019
TAX BOND CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $
HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE
PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND
ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE
TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A
LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, AND SAID
BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
DATE- , 20-.
CASH BOND
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
DEPUTY
TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS
OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE
PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY,
MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXES, OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES NOW A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED
TO BE $
DATE:
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
20-
DEPUTY
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE
SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR
OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED:
AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
OF CALIFORNIA FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
0. R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'S
ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE EASEMENT DEDICATED ON THIS MAP TO THE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT IS HEREBY ACCEPTED AND THE
DISTRICT CONSENTS TO THE RECORDATION THEREOF BY ITS DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
DATE-
SHEILA ZELAYA, BOARD SECRETARY OF THE EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THEREOF
SHEET 1 OF 7 SHEETS
RECORDER'S STATEMENT
FILED THIS DAY OF 20-
AT .M IN BOOK OF MAPS, AT PAGES
AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA.
NO.
FEE -
PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK -RECORDER
AM
DEPUTY
SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS
BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE
AT THE REQUEST OF WOODSIDE 05S, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP IN JANUARY 2018. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL
MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS
INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP AND THAT THE
MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO
BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS
TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. THIS SURVEY IS
TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN.
DATE:
LAND S��\
��, \PM Ro/; F1
W I LL I AM ROHAL, L. S. 8805
P
qTF QF CAL\F 30
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF SEVEN (7)
SHEETS HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND FOUND TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED
ON THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 37341 AS FILED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ON JUNE 20, 2018, THE EXPIRATION DATE BEING JUNE 20, 2021.
THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY
REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, AND I AM
SATISFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
DATED:
KRIS R. WINCHAK
EXP. 3-31-20
(AS DELEGATED)
CITY OF TEMECULA
2020
L.S. 6240
FOR PATRICK A. THOMAS,
CITY ENGINEER
ANo. L.S. 6240
*/
\0F C
SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SBM
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
132)
L2
(N
71051'24"
E
60.57'
134)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
R4)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
L11
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
R3)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30010'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41°58'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59°53'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
e
L45��
L 5 9
�(N89* 39' 10" W
5282.95' R4)-A-
(N89° 39' 12"W
co 5282.87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
N.T.S.
APRIL 2019
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR
BOUNDARY MAP,
BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR
SHEET INDEX MAP.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' R4) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' 131)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' 132)
I (N 89°39'12" W 319.80' 132) L56 (N 38015'21" E 655.50' 134)
(N 38° 15' 19" E 655.48' R2) L32
MURRIETTA HpT L46 ( N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' R4) L57 (N 00 33' 48" E 485.01' R4) o �r
SPRINGS ROAD j
(N 0° 33' 47" E 485.01' R2) "� °�
_ _ I (N 0 20'S8" E 265.41' R2) Imo,
- L47 (S 89°26'26" E 126.20' R4) L58 (N 89039'10" W 55.00' R4) L47
° M
_ (N 8939' 12" W 55. 00' R2 & R3) �
(N 89°26' 26" W 126.19' 132 ) L59 (N 890 39' 10" W 601.73' 134) \��' 7 T ° L48 ( N 0°33' 34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.61' R2) `P L2� \� ti = `-\1 ;D
I Y A, o (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' 132 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 50' PM 14/93-94) N �1
I NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC- "' 0 �1 Lj)
L49 IN 48°26'S0" W 30.47' R4) ____ __ _ �� r a'� w tt� )
�' w
(N 48 ° 25' 50" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600.00' 653.17' R4) v �L23 s t'� C)
L50 (N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' 134) (23° 23' 33" 1600.00' 653.24' R1 & 132) L22
(N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ) C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600.00' 59.98' 134) �" r o (/)
- - - 59.92' R1
RORIPAUGH L51 (N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500.00' R4)
C3 (35°° �2' 42' 1600.00' 992.60 R4) & R2) j /r Z o z
\ I I
VALLEY v z
ROAD L52 (N 0°33'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600.00' 992.63' R1 & R2)
(N 0°34'04"E 1610.00' R1) �� J
O - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4)
IN 38015'18"E 82.30' R2)
66. l / L54 (N 0033' 48" E 150.19' 134 ) � j L43
�� �'j / ��6• IN 0 33'47"E 150.19' R2 8 R3] L13 ��4� L1o �,a
L 41
00 6 L8 Lg
�'A L5�� ■-
v0 L53 \
�N81°36'16"E 1 37 342
�9
�o� 465.13' , AYE
/Vj\ 5 �� �36
�h� e� 65113' RZl p 1�
lb
N53°53'32Q�R D 4 h• / -_/� �� 'TIRAC 'T �]�° 37306 I
o
Ael
40
11 lz�
L� v
L7
L7 C« �7
L�
LL,
55' -
55'=
BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD
20
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-11
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
I D
VG3QC, 'ff I HOO ® I 377 �C� o
m
Io 0 0 0 o z
AG 0
'TRACT,
No.
j
IoMo
M �-
ooZo 0 o a e a I I �R1/ CCU I I FD 1"IP W/PP "FRANK
�3� �3� o J & LAURA RICE 28029 / o 0 o -
DN. 0.5, NO REFERENCE Q �� ��
� L� (422.01' R4] o o IL ACCEPTED AS POINT
N89° 26' 26"W) ON S'LY LINE OF
QN
L49-
L�J
SEE
DETAIL "A "
29
(422.00' R2 L48 u R & C 7 H0. 37 3 41= fi g R3 & R4, /
N89° 26' 26"W) �� TRACT MAP NO. 37341 -11
L47 ---_ SOMMERS BEND= - - �D 1" IP OPEN DN. 0.5
FD 8'X8 STONE MON. NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS (75.81' R4)
L59 MK'D "P 17" ON STY T 4 POINT ON STY LINE OF R3 & R4 (75. 84' R2 & R3) \�
SIDE UP 1.2 PER (625.52' 134) (878.58' R4) K6k2 L45- R2, R3 & R4 H (0 ° IS7 30 o ��] g � (� g � g � e � S 625.59R2 & R3)� (878.53' R2 -& R3)
- - - - -
- ---�-� ��- (5227.95' R4) (5227.88' R2 & R3) ---
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY (N89° 39' 10"W 5282 95' R4) ' 11
LLI Q
a, coC= L
a
nN
o oa
z=�
-- r- U z
z=)
Q o
12
cn
�m
L�
o
a
m 1
m °
ao
U \
z
�
~O L� d�
co LL 11
�
Ll-
N
M �
N 1
o
CD
T cJ
Lj� u
L)-
M
V
c.fl
N \
w
N\\ �
o
Z �
v, J
(N89 39 12 W 5282.87 R2 & R3)
1-1
�l�ll8) 1 zf"/
�I�JJ8) 15-3�
P1�ll= 1 -J/ -PAR 1 12 �1�J1 , 1 4/ 93- )5 FAR
1 1 -PATR � -PATR 1 3 / -pAJ�
° 93- )5
9- -0 )
l�5 3
P2 �, )��71 l� 'f
SHEET 2 OF 7 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
4. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
5. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 12.310 ACRES GROSS.
6. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
7. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
8. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 33 LOTS.
9. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
10. RAID INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
11. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
12. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
13. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
14. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
15. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED ---------------- AS INST.
NO --------------
17. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑X MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 & R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 & R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 & R4, DN. 0.1'.
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. AND
RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34,
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
SCALE: 1" = 400'
400 0 460 800
AULD RD-,,
0
MURRIETq HOT �o
SPRINGS RD SITE
Qo
p,9
RQ
N1�OLp5
c
CANTRELL
--I
RD
m m
LA SERENA
o
15
WAY
0
MARGARITA
�O
RD
RCP�10��
Of
9�
MEADOWS
PKWY
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS SHEET AFFECTING
THIS MAP IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE OF
THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECULA, IN E.C.S.
BOOK T , PAGE . THIS AFFECTS ALL LOTS.
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-11
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
\ 'r mZ Cr
\
DETAIL \ m(o. 371���
NOT TO SCALE \ \ �°, �] �� ��
H0
BOUNDARY MAP
APRIL 2019
0 HB keg/ Be @a
Lfi O LQcr H00® 377so olk
� I�
a
.F. C15 / / to ti O ::D
`��ph•0. ��V /// T I \\ 9 I O m
I ONO \ I 1 se.
s- FOF�,
/ o
r _ y °`L a' > Cq(N84° 56' 01 "W L2 C G 8
\ C3 343. 68, R4) , o
O
OLEA WAY 4� 0
\ /!� �-�-Ir- ,- - T -1 � � "�,�0•�� c`' FD 1I P W/PP "FRANK
& LAURA RCE 28029
,
�5�•6��� DN.
Lo
0.5' , NO REFERENCE
-L-_
(p=43 34 56 �S
SOMME
i �Q -�
ACCEPTED AS POINT
ON S' LY LINE OF
_
- - - -
FD 1" I P OPEN DN. 0.5'
C12
R3 & R4
NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS
C11 CIOL4L4
POINT ON S' LY LINE OF R3 & R4
Q�
I
o
i N10° 25' 49"W RAD
nn
7Wnn QC7 MO. 37 30 o
Q`Q , ��y���
a o 0 o e o 8
=
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY
(625.52' 134)
(625.59' R2 & 133)
(5227.95' R4) (5227.88'
R2 & R3) -PA-F '
(N89° 39' 10"W
5282.95' R4) (N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2 & R3)
TRACT MAP NO. 37341-11
FJ\l1J 9 �'5)/7 1 -7
TABLE DATA
rra
(N83° 34' 00" E
C8 300.21' R4)
�N13°33'24"E RAD PRC
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
----
L1
----------------
(N
47°55'03"
W
---------
84.84'
R4)
----
C1
----------
(14013'18"
--------
470.00'
----------
116.66'
134)
----
C8
-----------
(19059'24"
--------
500.00'
----------
174.45'
134)
L2
(N
84051'31"
W
26.50'
R4)
C2
(36025'05"
50.00'
31.78'
134)
C9
(13032'58"
1000.00,
236.48'
134)
L3
(N
38026'11"
W RAD
26.00'
R4)
C3
(30031'09"
35.00'
18.64'
R4)
C10
(10026'15"
1000.00,
182.17'
134)
L4
(N
89059'34"
W
105.00'
R4)
C4
(23052'44"
456.00'
190.05'
134)
C11
(38024'55"
300.00'
201.14'
134)
L5
(N
12009'22"
E RAD
150.04'
R4)
C5
(25002'47"
50.00'
21.86'
134)
C12
(15049'44"
300.00'
82.88'
134)
L6
(N
0021'36"
E
2636.10'
R4)
C6
(25007'17"
35.00'
15.35'
134)
C13
15008'45"
790.00'
70.95'
134)
(N
0021'34"
E
2636.07'
R2 & R3)
C7
(23050'38"
100.00,
41.62'
134)
C14
(14020'12"
765.00'
191.42'
R4)
L7
(N
0033'48"
E
150.19'
R4)
C15
0001,101,
725.00'
0.25'
(N
0033'47"
E
150.19'
R2 & R3)
(878.58' R4)
(878.53' R2 & R3)
F AJR J
,%
1�60.° No12 �ql
Not ,w
. �,q �ql �
-5 9
(75.81' R4) o
(75.84' R2 & 133) M
6
-pAR
zr
SHEET 3 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 ,AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
00
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
t�
(CORS) 'P477", "BILL" AND 'PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 28° 53'23" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
t�
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354'.
L�
LLB
L
LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
- INDICATES CENTER LINE
M
N
ti
0
C
ro
_
-i-"
N
W
,
t7 (c.
�
LLB -17
1
1 (,
N
L-
i
\o
0-
0
\z
0
Qo
M
N
w
M
o ,
-00 28' 03.697"
•
■
C
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES EXISTING LOT LINE
INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED
LS 8805, FLUSH TO BE SET PER
TRACT MAP 37368, MB 468/89-98.
INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE
TAGGED LS 8805, FLUSH.
INDICATES CONTINUOUS OPERATING
REFERENCE STATIONS (CORS, AS NOTED).
CORS STATION "BILL"
N 2154995.0380�
E 6313564.1750
N88° 29' 38" E
5295. 87' (GRID) 10 I a6�% )
9 N88° 29' 38" E la 3a° ���
�D To (N8896. 3 2937"E ��� ��•
20 2T 5296.39' ��
rno
�I 12 �oP�
�I .
N89° 26' 12"W /
55.00' M
BUTTERFIELD L7 STAGE ROAD 120 1 ,2� ���� 11 \ 0, 1,,,
1 6�0
CORS STATION "PMOB" \ \
N 2074153.1260��
E 6375547.4700
CONVERGENCE ANGLE
AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 21
0PC\
,32 W 93a2o•
/�/, N55°N3 BASIS OF
BEARINGS DETAIL
N.T.S.
STATION "P477"
7663.6770
8482.8020
z
SCALE: 1" = 200'
260 0 260 400
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-11
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
SHEET 4 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY SHEET INDEX MAP APRIL 2019 LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES EXISTING EASEMENT LINE
SCALE: 1"= 100' / / / / / / I ND I CATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS
100 I O INDICATES SHEET N0. O 100 200
EASEMENT NOTES
/ � 1
0
'rRLac'r H0. 373o a 5
" LANUJI:ArL-
11
12
'TQLaC 'T m0 ® 37 30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
FAJ-� , 2
FJV1� 95) I7 J -7
13
AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND
INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF GENERAL
TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED
DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
O.R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED HEREON.
PRIVATE SLOPE & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
TO THE HOA (WIDTH VARIES) WITHIN LOT 33
AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS
FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DEDICATED HEREON.
AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER AND WATER PURPOSES
WITHIN LOTS "A" THROUGH "D".
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
i
4
L�
L
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-11
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
m Q c'r N (3 ® I (7 34 � o � 0 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
L VL 12 /
DETAIL 1"b*
36 / _ �cc,Q \ NOT TO SCALE
tea,•
40'
>9q
`L /
1 •9RC
\ / fah• \000 /o;�o o
L21 L21 G
�
1<0 - s
i ti a F ah• \ ��� ,� FF
Lil
o
GPF' `
2 O� >O, �0• SS,, ?1-
''� �• O h
JP��oti. � j `L°' °� \ S0� O'q �� 00'
1V'2�p� 65 10V'16,, �,�gN
4(/ ,41�A�8�6 0 _
N-C1 L-2 gd_ =1�? °4 08LOT
\
5 L � �' o �o� 00, N83° 00'W
0 ,,
/ \,,�`' NS s� �•p6 �O 0; 4 ��^�`� / '906117,zp
61.50 03
00,
�1 g-.<v - - 2 o`er' 31 176.06, `\ L 9 W
o ?�' C6 = `� "LANDSCAPE" 0.186 AC C=�j o
N ��°°� 26'�E RAD N89° 59' 34"W 223.29' M l�� l&
00
N 6s°11,
S9
2ti
I_
5 0o �856 �
483° 26' 30" E
a
N80° 49'01 "W
N82° 13' 47"E
84.27'
59.94'
62.11
�, 6 �,
z
465 11� o o
Z
9
7 o
f
8
0
'o
N
0�4 \ �
\
o
QIZI
� /
ti I
N o
0 Vol
W
O
o cl
ti I WI
z n I p
28.00' 100/
28_00' N
- �- -
0�2 ti / L=95 28' `�=4 _l6 - L=187.27' o N89° 59' 34"W 105.00' o, C15 ih l� zl
20' 04 �1"� - - -C9 �C10 10° 26' 151 R=1028. 00' o o o i L19 0
/ R/SAT ° RooK TERRACE co LOT "A" �, N; o _ _
7' R=272.00' L=182.37' Y B C19 / o
(4, E `STREET �i o DA N89° 59' 34"W 105. 00' �� C19 �
Q / 38°24'S5'R_3 0' 26' 15" R=1000. 00' L=182.17, R4) (A=13° 32' 58" R=1000. 00' N
L=236.48' R4)
/ 00. 00' L=201.14' R4)
�y
N87° 12' 36" E
67.29'
70.25'
85.75'
68.89'
14.13' ti
z
z
o
z
ti
0
00
0
o
o
ti
N
0
_
o
Ln
N
o
�
I W
13
�
cn
L'
^cn
=
oo
�
n
CD
o
_Q,wIIrr-1
L=62.79'
L=68.12' zl 'Y
3„
-A=.3°.29' 58".
.C11- _49.08'
-
-55.92'- r1 F
_A=.3°_47'_49" '
SHEET 5 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY
CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S
NOTES
AND MONUMENT
NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO.
3 FOR
BOUNDARY
MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND
VICINITY
MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO.
4 FOR
SHEET INDEX
MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
CURVE TABLE
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
Cl
16007'10"
102.00'
--------
28.70'
C2
11048'41"
102.00'
21.03'
C3
12027'07"
102.00'
22.17'
C4
52022'02"
46.00'
42.04'
C5
55049'15"
46.00'
44.82'
C6
96029'48"
46.00'
77.47'
C7
4027'21"
328.00'
25.51'
C8
8046'01"
272.00'
41.62'
C9
9034'43"
272.00'
45.47'
C10
1043'52"
1028.00'
31.06'
C11
0055'31"
1028.00'
16.60'
C12
(15049'44"
300.00'
82.88' R4)
C13
5008'45"
790.00'
70.95'
C14
15049'44"
328.00'
90.62'
C15
4031'29"
1028.00'
81.18'
C16
0043'40"
1028.00'
13.06'
C17
4011'00"
765.00'
55.86'
C18
4027'37"
500.00'
38.92'
C19
2028'05"
1000.00'
43.08'
C20
4011'00"
725.00'
52.94'
C21
4044'10"
500.00'
41.33'
C22
5047'34"
500.00'
50.55'
C23
0001,101,
725.00'
0.25'
C24
0001,101,
765.00'
0.26'
C25
(43034'56"
750.00'
570.49' R4)
C26
5020'12"
46.00'
4.28'
C27
4009'50"
765.00'
55.60'
C28
4009'50"
725.00'
52.69'
C29
15000'38"
102.00'
26.72'
LINE
TABLE
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
N 06007'49"
E
30.86'
L2
N 86040'24"
E
41.04'
L3
N 38026'11"
W RAD
26.00'
L4
S 18048'41"
W
41.04'
L5
N 07000'00"
E
29.80'
L6
N 36045'57"
W
23.52'
L7
S 50045'58"
W
23.52'
L8
N 38000'00"
W
38.18'
L9
S 83000'00"
E
6.50'
L10
N 84034'11"
E
23.03'
L11
N 78053'27"
W
31.16'
L12
N 43036'07"
W
35.31'
L13
N 14033'21"
W
19.43'
L14
N 89014'41"
E RAID
36.99'
L15
N 53051'00"
E
25.13'
L16
N 12009'22"
E
24.81'
L17
N 38000'00"
W
24.05'
L18
N 04038'10"
W
35.64'
L19
N 83000'00"
W
88.54'
L20
N 41056'16"
E
6.24'
L21
N 88035'31"
W
28.28'
to
L22
N 48003'44"
W
28.10'
L23
N 48003'44"
W
28.00'
Q
L24
N 43036'07"
W
1.93'
Z
W
Lu
Lu
Lu
SCALE: 1" = 50' N10° 25' 49"W RAD PRC Q
All V'VU 7d" P RAn PR('
50 0 50 100
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-11
> BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
,rnAc,r Ho.>/ / RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
/ N57' 55' 08" W RAD
------
h'
s0�i e`loF�gi �� , �
O
/ h 90 doh• o ho,/ „jo°,'
0
32
'9q i 'S`L \�'A� , �q0 "BASIN" C3 C ra�23°
4 2 44,E
BLANKET EASEMENT R--456,
o 3op o°F"�a • ��• ��o° \ 6p>,, \� F OVER AOR ILL OF LOT PURPOSESNAGE 32 �� / �� a`2p°Q5�5��� QO" L'19Q,
L20 /sue s� LOT '1g1� ,ssp "�`L�o \�� 1.341 ACRES �`�/ 00 L=159. 96ti 1N84° 56' 01 "W 343.68' R4)
°20
'q 3
49 4 , I W
-V-
4
\� L 19s�S i �' ; N80° 15' 15„ 33 "LANDSCAPE"
�� _� 86.40' W N85° 27' 06"W SEE SHEET 7
o S
Tti \��°� 121.46' l
14 ,M
W 15 a
l�6 ' a'S. \4.20° 2 M 16
2�. \ Z
JP��� �0�9 L10 ti' 6 �� 26,, \6 C z Off/ s 80
z
DETAIL ,�tih' ,,�� Q�'��'/�P \ �' 'p sC/O R,4�2
NOT TO SCALE ,. �a� �°o /Q` �P�j \ \ 4,34�q 00!q 00' L,2 C
\ 4� 9 16,, O c00 65, �3 _ N83 00 00 W 114.41 Q / `oak./ \ '3p �I k ' `\34R8Vc • _ 27. 45 C14 C �Pp
ST 30 C o C5 L3 d Z I ��S �`�
6 9, 9 0 12
��pp" �"�/ \ ,528FT 8y, 5 0 �, Og
SD �� o� oo 4 �8.32 N83° 00'0011W \ 17 '� 22
cd ° � M
`ah•a� SF 2 o ,,-N83 29'58"E_RAD `o
=9 w N83° 00' 00" W 111. 34'
/� h �i •9� ti 28.00' o J 18 al
o o N83000'00"W 114.33' z
2.01
0
0
i
0�, 0 28.00' / �Q
O'Q C Z `� 19
L 20 5��,, 28.001
28.00'
LOT "A" o L 14 0 2 O ti
PRIVATE o I a' -
STREET N' C19 C19 o C11 _ -C9
--+-(A=13° 32' 58" R=1000. 00' N C'4 Y13no - C12
4 5
L=236.48' R4)� K TERRACE
� SCALE: 1" = 50' U n A c u H0. �37 30 S � C8
50 0 50 100 o o 0 0 o oT3
% N13° 33' 24" E RAD PRC
23
Z
SHEET 6 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
LINE TABLE
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(N
47°55'03"
W
84.84' 134)
L2
N
06007'49"
E
30.86'
L3
N
86040'24"
E
41.04'
L4
N
18048'41"
E
41.04'
L5
N
07000'00"
E
29.80'
L6
N
36045'57"
W
23.52'
L7
N
50045'58"
E
23.52'
L8
N
38000'00"
W
38.18'
L9
N
83000'00"
W
6.50'
L10
N
84034'11"
E
23.03'
L11
N
36020'38"
W
25.59'
L12
N
45052'07"
E
39.73'
L13
N
23041'22"
W
52.25'
L14
N
83000'00"
W
88.54'
L15
N
48003'44"
W
28.00'
L16
N
48003'44"
W
28.10'
L17
N
14033'21"
W
19.43'
L18
N
43036'07"
W
35.31'
L19
N
78053'27"
W
31.16'
L20
N
88035'31"
W
28.28'
L21
N
43036'07"
W
1.93'
CURVE
TABLE
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
Cl
(14013'18"
470.00'
_ARC ____
116.66'
134)
C2
(36025'05"
50.00'
31.78'
134)
C3
(30031'09"
35.00'
18.64'
134)
C4
( 3046'48"
456.00'
30.08'
134)
C5
16007'10"
102.00'
28.70'
C6
11048'41"
102.00'
21.03'
C7
4009'50"
765.00'
55.60'
C8
(19059'24"
500.00'
174.45'
134)
C9
2043'20"
472.00'
22.43'
C10
4027'37"
500.00'
38.92'
C11
4005'19"
1028.00'
73.36'
C12
19044'17"
472.00'
162.60;
C13
4007'03"
472.00'
33.92'
C14
24037'33"
68.00'
29.23 "
C15
24034'10"
68.00'
29.16'
C16
37037'51"
68.00'
44.66'
C17
25018'43"
68.00'
30.04'
C18
4044'10"
500.00'
41.33'
C19
2028'05"
1000.00,
43.08'
C20
4009'51"
725.00'
52.69'
C21
0001110"
725.00'
0.25'
C22
0001110"
765.00'
0.26'
C23
4011'00"
765.00'
55.86'
C24
4011'00"
725.00'
52.94'
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-11
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
SCALE: 1" = 50'
50 0 50 100 'T m A C 'T H ® 37 30
SHEET 7 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
UI
a_I
Q R
45
412p° 6, 00, 0 I
5 7C-190.05
LA
co �cn``'/ 00 L=159.96~
o, (N8
�- o� II
, 20 4° 56' W
01 "343.68'
° R4)
3 Z \ C2
494�"W � C1 L 1 C3
44 N80015'15"W 33 "LANDSCAPE"
86- 40, N85° 27' 06" W 1.228 ACRES
g 121.46' 3
N85°33'54"W 103.58'
L14 J L15 N89° 47' 44"E
,'S'o ' 68. 98' lam,
0 23 , . p'�' 1JR=46 Op,
S00 �',�� ��� �► ��� ly 24 �N61°0 „ a 6� \ w p S�
2 6; 3, N6 ° W'
LINE TABLE Sy 24. ' - �N89° 37' 56"E 109. 75' 71,p0�' 4�1 3
° 42 (� � s,
NAME DIRECTION LENGTHN81 24'40��W 118. 53' I J \� N75°22'11„ 196
----------------------------- / 8
L1 (N 84051'31" W 26.50' R4) 2O 0 25,58' I °° ' a; b c�,�o a`8°58 L;RqO a„
,10' _
L2 N 36 20' 38" W 25.59' O N "� 20' w N
L3 N 32041 ' 20" W 30.53' O 0 25 --' rn
L4 N 06026'00" W 53.93' �� "' 22 Z w '� = N 111.1 �9',
L5 N 38041 ' 33" E 24.09' o C15 °' 99'
L6 N 06 ° 26' 00" W 8.93' I `o � N89° 37' 56" E 143. 98' o mm
L7 N 08035' 20" E 42.60N81 ° ' 18, ' 28•00 N N
L8 N 06025' 18" W 50.00' 24 40�� 88 --_ \N73,5 � 61° 9
L9 N 51026'00" W 24.04' W 131.37' z 28.00' C15 4'?�„w 6, 28 S �1S''
L10 N 08035'20" E RAD 16.94' 23, J I -RAD N N Q> g•
L11 N 83034' 10" E 90.07' -`Q 72 J I 26 0 0
L13 N 23041'22" W 52.25Lo
L14 N 84052' 19" W 49.96' o rn
� 21 28•00 28_00, r 29Lo i
L15 N 85 33'55" W 54.64'
ro 56.00' �
z `D N83° 34' 0011E 163.74' v o
CURVE TABLE 4 5 i_
N88° 40' 31 "W RAD 138.36' I ,` o -------- _
�, �, w F-rn I N86° 30' 39"W RAD .gyp, o � fig.
NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC 3� Q W 9- = 1
C1 (25002'47" 50 00' 21 86' R4) � O
C2 (25007' 17" 35.00' 15.35' R4) o `�60 p� j, �9q ` QQ'i C \CEO 6q° q0 3� g0
C3 (23050'38" 100.00, 41.62' R4) 20 `�o `' �O 5p• 2`E 6
C4 4005' 19" 1028.00' 73.36' 28.001
-00 w 2
C5 15000' 38" 102.00' 26.72' 2 _
86°07' 03"
D 8-0609C6 �2 -Cl I
5.65'
C7 15001'20" 328.00' 86.00' N83o 40ST
REET
C8 15000'38102.00' 26.72' A=17'00'58"- L=140._1.8'-L T N TEd_19 oLOT A" PRVA°44�17" R=472.00' L=162.60'C9 15001 '20" 272.00' 71 .31
C10 1501 20 300.00' 78.66; B45.001
300•27' R4)
C11 2043'20" 472.00' 22.43' ROOK TERRACE 43.00' (N83°34'00"
C12 7045 29 328.00' 44.41 (4=19°592411 R=500.00' L=174.45' R4) 4C13 7015'50" 328.00' 41 .58'
rq6�.
Qp' IN
C14 96002'29" 46.00' 77.11'
C15 7030'19" 102.00' 13.36' �i C22 5
C16 5005'59" 272.00' 24.21' Q/
C17 9055'21" 272.00' 47.10'
C18 14016'43" 102.00' 25.42' W�
C19 32024'11" 46.00' 26.01' v/
C20 53042'52" 46.00' 43.12' •`v/
C21 3046' 48" 456.00' 30.08' A�� ��° °
C22 0015'06" 500.00' 2.20' ,n�
Z-!/
SEE SHEET NO. 3
ii
SEE SHEET NO. 3
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
R2)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
132)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
134)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
L11
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30010'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41°58'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES
1. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN 30
MILES OF MOUNT PALOMAR OBSERVATORY.
ALL PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PALOMAR
OBSERVATORY RECOMMENDATIONS,
ORDINANCE NO. 655.
2. THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN A
LIQUEFACTION HAZARD ZONE.
� 7 = � a
20
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UJ
J �
a
W Jr
H
TRACT MAP NO, 337341-11�a J�
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, °a N
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 J
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. F,-,- 1
�L
L59
' 10" W
5282, 95' R4)-V
(N89° 39' 12"W
00 5282,87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
APRIL 2019 N.T.S.
10
CITY LIMIT � � � )
\ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' 134) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' R2)
I IN 89°39'12" W 319 80' R2► L56 (N 38015/21" E 655.50� R4) -5N L32
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
(N 38 15 19 E 655.48 R2)
MURRIETTA HOT I L46 (N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' R4) L57 (N 0° 33' 48" E 485.01' R4) o �r
A Ob
RINGS ROAD j
(N 0020' 58" E 265.41 ' R2 ) (N 00 33' 47" E 485.01' R2) � "s I N �1
L47 (S 89°26'26" E 126.20' R4) L58 (N 89°39�10 W 55.00� R4) N M
- - - IN 89°26'26" W 126.19' R2) (N 89°39 12�� W 55.00' R2 & R3) ti
L59 (N 89 39 10 W 601.73 134)
/V �0 ° L48 (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.61' R2) `p
I o� o ( N 0°33' 34" E 76.01 ' R2 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 50' PM 14/93-94) �'s o) �; �, �1
I NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC- � (n
L49 (N 48°26'S0" W 30.47' R4) ��' �1�1a'�w w
6 ( N 48025' 50" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600. 00' 653.17' R4) v ,L23 s t'� C)
L50 ( N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' R4) (23° 23' 33" 1600. 00' 653. 24' R1 & R2) 21 �L22 U;
N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ► C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600. 00' 59.98' R4) �" r r o
- - - RORIPAUGH C3 (35° �2' 42' 1600. 00' 992.60 R4) 92' R1 & R2) j /r Z o z
\ VALLEY I I L51 ( N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500.00' R41 ° „ v Z
ROAD L52 (N 0033'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600. 00' 992.63' R1 & R2) �°� �� V a�
==�J ' (N 0034'04"E 1610.00' R1) �� J
0 - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4) '� j� IN 38015'18"E 82.30' R2) ��
o pC�j z � 6, o ° 66. l / L54 ( N 0033' 48" E 150.19' R4 ) j L43 I 1 `4
12� 7�� ��6• IN 0 33'47"E 150.19' R2 8 R3) �12 L13 ��4� L1o a
O�
Lg� L41
v0 L53 \
-- 'sr, 2 -� o it o °�� �4 °�0� °�� �J
465.13' �R3 E
N� 5 c� ��h� 65(VAB1 6 RZl]
N53°53'32Q�R D 4 h• / �---/� �� 'TIRIC'T Ho.
.
o
0 0 0 0 0 0
HE
° e25
/ V\ \ \� IJVll B 4 0 a a cal - 0 a
'QzN
d o \
-�
L7
Lf� C« �7
L�
D_
55' -
55'=
I D
VG3Q0Ir � MD. I 37306CID
Io 0 0 0 o Z
110'L.L
NO.
oMo
M �-
ooZo 0 o a e a I I �G��%, C�� II I FD 1"IP W/PP "FRANK \--�__-
4 Q 4 0 ° �� �� � �� �(� o J & LAURA RICE 28029 / o 0 o -
DN. 0.5, NO REFERENCE Q �� ��
� V) (422.01' R4 ] o o IL ACCEPTED AS POINT
N89° 26' 26"W) ON S'LY LINE OF
QN
L49-
L � L�J
SEE
DETAIL "A "
29
(422.00' R2 L48 U R Q C 7 H0. 37 341 e � z R3 & R4, /
N89° 26' 26"W)
- �� TRACT MAP NO. 37341 -11
-L51 -
_ SOMMERS BEND= - - -�
L47 FD 8 %8" STONE MON. --- 1 FD 1 IP OPEN TE 0.5 (75. 81' R4)
MK'D "P17"ON STY NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS (75.84' R2 & R3)
L59 J SIDE UP 1.2' PER POINT ON iSTY LINE OF R3 & R4 (625.52' R4) (878.58' R4) 6 L45- R2, R3 & R4 'T R Q C� 7 H 00 ° �37 �30 o m o 4 0 S/ S 0 e 0 S 625.59'R2 & R3
�- --------�-T--- --)-a - (878.53 R2 & R3)
7- - (5227.95' R4) (5227.88' R2 & R3)
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY (N89° 39' 10"W 5282 95' R4) ' 11
�r�r� , 11
-FAR, 2
(N89 39 12 W 5282.87 R2 & R3)
I PAR, ';' �r1r� I
�
11
�l�ll8) 1 '
�I�JJ8) 15r3�
, ,3
�J�ll= 1 21/ _PAR 1 12 �J�J1 l 1 ' 3- )5 FAR
1 1 _PATR � _PATR 1 3 / _pA
° 3- )5
9 � )
51-50
P2 �, )��11 �12 '
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
4. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
5. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 12.310 ACRES GROSS.
6. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
7. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
8. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 33 LOTS.
9. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
10. RAID INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
11. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
12. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
13. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
14. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
15. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED ---------------- AS INST.
NO --------------
17. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑x MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 & R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 & R4, DN. 0.1'.
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. AND
RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34,
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
SCALE: 1" = 400'
460 0 460 800
BOOK T PAGE
TOTAL NUMBERED LOTS: 24
TOTAL LETTERED LOTS: 1
TOTAL NET AREA. 15.485 ACRES
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 17.510 ACRES
OWNER'S STATEMENT
WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY
PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO
SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS
SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: LOT "A"
FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS
AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES AS SHOWN HEREON.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG
SOMMERS BEND TO THE PUBLIC. THE OWNERS OF LOT 24 ABUTTING
THIS HIGHWAY AND DURING SUCH TIME WILL HAVE NO RIGHTS OF
ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERAL EASEMENT OF TRAVEL. ANY CHANGE OF
ALIGNMENT OR WIDTH THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION THEREOF
SHALL TERMINATE THIS DEDICATION AS TO THE PART VACATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 24,
INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC
UTILITY PURPOSES.
WE HEREBY RETAIN LOT "A" INDICATED AS "PRIVATE STREET" FOR
PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR
SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SHOWN
HEREON WITHIN LOT 5, LOT 8, AND LOT 11 FOR PRIVATE USE FOR
THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND
LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN LOT 24 INDICATED AS "LANDSCAPE" FOR
PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS,
ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE SLOPE & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
AS SHOWN HEREON WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 23 FOR PRIVATE USE FOR
THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND
LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT
FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
(''DISTRICT''), A PUBLIC AGENCY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER
AND BY VIRTUE OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT LAW OF 1911,
ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF
WAY TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, ENLARGE, RECONSTRUCT, REMOVE AND
REPLACE, OPERATE, INSPECT, REPAIR, IMPROVE AND RELOCATE SEWER,
WATER, AND RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES, ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND DESIGNATED "SEWER, WATER, AND
RECYCLED WATER EASEMENT" HEREON, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT
OF ACCESS TO AND FROM SAID EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXERCISING THE RIGHTS GRANTED IN SAID EASEMENT. OWNER RETAINS
THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENT AREA PROVIDED THAT OWNER SHALL
NOT CONSTRUCT OR ERECT BUILDINGS, MASONRY WALLS, MASONRY
FENCES AND OTHER STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS, OR PLANT OR
GROW TREES OR SHRUBS, OR CHANGE THE SURFACE GRADE OR INSTALL
PRIVATELY -OWNED PIPELINES WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT
OF DISTRICT.
OWNER:
WOODS I DE 05S, LP,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
.y
NAME: CHRIS CHAMBERS
TITLE: VICE PRESIDENT, WDS GP, INC.
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
AS GENERAL PARTNER
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-12
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 13 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS
CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE
INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,
ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
ON
BEFORE ME,
NOTARY PUBLIC PERSONALLY APPEARED
A
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE
THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN
INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED
THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT
BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S),
OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED,
EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE
AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
SIGNATURE
NAME:
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE
PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS:
COMMISSION EXPIRES:
COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, BY ITS CITY CLERK, RANDI JOHL, HEREBY
APPROVES THE TRACT MAP AND ACCEPTS THE OFFER
OF DEDICATION OF LOT "A" MADE HEREON FOR PUBLIC
UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF
INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY AND SERVICE VEHICLES.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF ABUTTERS
RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG SOMMERS BEND AS DEDICATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE 3' PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT AS DEDICATED.
DATED:
BY:
2020
RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK, CITY OF TEMECULA
SOILS REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66490 OF THE
STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, A PRELIMINARY SOILS
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF CA. PROJECT NO. 10967.108
ON JUNE 25, 2018, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECLULA.
APRIL 2019
TAX BOND CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $
HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE
PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND
ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE
TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A
LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, AND SAID
BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
DATE- , 20—.
CASH BOND
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
DEPUTY
TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS
OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE
PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY,
MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXES, OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES NOW A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED
TO BE $
DATE:
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
20.
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
SHEET 1 OF 7 SHEETS
RECORDER'S STATEMENT
FILED THIS DAY OF 20—
AT .M IN BOOK OF MAPS, AT PAGES
AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA.
NO.
FEE:
PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK -RECORDER
ME
DEPUTY
SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS
BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE
AT THE REQUEST OF WOODSIDE 05S, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP IN JANUARY 2018. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL
MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS
INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP AND THAT THE
MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO
BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS
TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. THIS SURVEY IS
TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN.
DATE:
W I LL I AM ROHAL, L.S. 8805
�4 LAND SU\
\v� 0\,\NM Roy �o
\�F CA1-\F09
DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF SEVEN (7)
SHEETS HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND FOUND TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED
ON THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 37341 AS FILED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ON JUNE 20, 2018, THE EXPIRATION DATE BEING JUNE 20, 2021.
THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY
REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, AND I AM
SATISFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE DATED:
SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR
OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED:
AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
OF CALIFORNIA FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
0. R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'S
ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE EASEMENT DEDICATED ON THIS MAP TO THE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT IS HEREBY ACCEPTED AND THE
DISTRICT CONSENTS TO THE RECORDATION THEREOF BY ITS DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
DATE:
SHEILA ZELAYA, BOARD SECRETARY OF THE EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THEREOF
KRIS R. WINCHAK
EXP. 3-31-20
(AS DELEGATED)
CITY OF TEMECULA
2020
L.S. 6240
FOR PATRICK A. THOMAS,
CITY ENGINEER
No. L.S. 6240
f�gjF OF C A1.�F���\�
SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SBM
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
132)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
R4)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
L11
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
R3)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
134)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
133)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
134)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
134)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
133)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
134)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
134)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
133)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
134)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30010'17"
E
129.03'
133)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41058'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
134)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
133)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
134)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
133)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
134)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
133)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
134)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
133)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
134)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
134)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
134)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
133)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
133)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
133)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
134)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
134)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
134)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
133)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
134)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
134)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
e
�L
- L59 --k-
�(N89' 39' 10" W
5282.95' R4)-Ar-
(N89° 39' 12"W
00 5282.87, R2 & R3)
Ln
DETAIL "A "
N.T.S.
APRIL 2019
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR
BOUNDARY MAP,
BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR
SHEET INDEX MAP.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' R4) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' 132)
I (N 89°39'12" W 319.80' 132) L56 (N 38015'21" E 655.50' 134)
(N 38° 15' 19" E 655.48' R2) L32
MURRIETTA HOT I L46 ( N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' R4) L57 (N 00 33' 48" E 485.01' 134) o --R\r
\SPRINGS- J (N Oo 33' 47" E 485.01' R2) � "� °�
� ROAD I ( N 0 ° 20' S8" E 265.41 ' R2 ►
L47 ( S 89 ° 26' 26" E 126.20' R4 ) L58 (N 89 39 10 W 55.00 R4) N M ��
- - - ( N 89 ° 26' 26" W 126.19' R2 ► (N 890 39' 12" W 55. 00' R2 & R3) � �
L59 (N 89 39 10 W 601.73 R4) �' T
L48 (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.61' R2) `p
(N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' 132 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 50' PM 14/93-94) (; w �1
I Old
NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC- (n �� L�
L49 IN 48°26'50" W 30.47' R4) _ C �1�1 a'�w tt� � w
(N 48 ° 25' 50" W 30.48' R2 ) Cl (23° 23' 23" 1600.00' 653.17' R4) v �L23 s t'� C)
Lo
L50 (N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' 134) (23° 23' 33" 1600.00' 653. 24' R1 & 132) L22 U;
(N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ) C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600.00' 59.98' 134) �' r r o (/)
- - - RORIPAUGH C3 (35° �2' 42' 1600.00' 992.60 R4) & R2) j /r � Z o z
\ VALLEY I I L51 ( N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500.00' R41 ° „ v Z
ROAD L52 (N 0°33'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600.00' 992.63' R1 & R2)
__ �1 ' (N 0°34'04"E 1610.00' R1) % J
o - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4) '� j� IN 38015'18"E 82.30' R2) IR2 o
6, o ° 66. l / L54 ( N 0033' 48" E 150.19' R4 ) j L43 I 1 `4
�� �'j�� 12� 7�� ��6• IN 0 33'47"E 150.19' R2 8 133) �12 L13 �L14� L1o �,a
0 �.r° L8 Lg� L41 w
7 // 56 0 �R L5�� _
- rnL Clr Flo. 37 34� e3
L53 L,
--� �'sr, L2 4G3LaC�� U�10 ® �M] o ll �4 �00 ��77
73 R4)
5 �,14i���°ti (N81°36� RZIE
�C/y0 �/ �„� �1�,�; 465.13 3� ( (°��� z = ' g \ / a
N53°53'32Q�R D 4 'T1Rl% 'T Flo®
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 �
o ° e / V\ \ \� LIVLI B 4 0 a a cal - 0 a Q
HE 47 V 1 � 2� � M Rs � � D�� \ �� ��� �IL
lelo
z
n, hd � ° cry o,
1 „ 11 o 20 I �� i \ �o ® �� ��� \��\ �o
L� v
L7
Lf� C« �7
L�
El-
55' -
55'=
J
N
� r-I.,-
BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD
�7 M
20
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,,
37341-12
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 13 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
I D
VG3La(r"ffcar
Io 0 0 0 o z
NO.
�I oMo
M -�-
zz�o?o o FD 1"IP W/PP "FRANK
`1 'r G3 La o u H o ® �� �3� � e � � I � �3� �3� o � & LAURA RICE 28029 /j \ � cF Q LA o 97 03�1 �3C� no -
DN. 0.5 , NO REFERENCE -
� V) (422. 01' R4 H o / - I ACCEPTED AS POINT - V�
N89° 26' 26"W) L ON S'LY LINE OF
L49-
L�J
SEE
DETAIL "A "
20 t
29
N8(422
°
260' "2
L48
7 Flo. �37 341== z
R3 &
R4,�
�G Laos
Fl o. �37 �341_�� \\
_L'URIC
�I
L47
_ ��--�-
RFD 8"X8" STONE - SOMMERS BEND= -
- FD 1" IP OPEN DN. 0.5
MKT 'P17 ON
�MON.
NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED
SLY ��
AS
TRACT MAP NO. 37341
(75.81' R4)
12 (75. 84 R2 & R3)
L59 J
SIDE UP 1.2'
p
PER G3 La o 97 �3C� o POINT
ON SLY LINE OF R3 &
R4
L45-
-
R2, R3 & R4
- - -
g S S e S
-
(625.52' R4)
625.59R2 & R3
(878.58' R4) 6n
(878.53' R2 & R3) -
I �
_ _ _
- (5227.95' R4)
(5227.88' R2 & R3)
_/
�r1f� � 1 1
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY (N89° 39' 10'W 5282.95' R4)
� -FAR � 2 �r1f� � �1 t r�f� � �
(N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2
I
& R3)
\
� ll r' /
�l�ll� 1 '
p1�J1� 15 3�
�J�ll� 1 �7� �r1t� , 12
pJ�J1� 1 / 3- )�
�r1r� 1
1 �r�r� ,
�,
r' ll
r r1f� / �r1f�
'
° 3- )5
93-3--3 9
57-5�3
P111J )��71 l�
SHEET 2 OF 7 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, TO BE
SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37341-11 MB /
4. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
5. 0 INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, TO BE
SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37341-11 MB L
6. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE 461.21.
7. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 17.510 ACRES GROSS.
8. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
9. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
10. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 24 LOTS.
11. INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
12. RAD INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
13. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
14. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
15. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
16. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
17. R5 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37341-11 MB /
18. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
19. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED---------------- AS INST.
NO
20. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑X MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6
FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72,
R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7
FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
o
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'.
C)
8
FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD.
AND RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9
FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10
FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
w
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34, J
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
o
11
FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12
FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
o
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
AULD RDo
f
MURRIETq HOT
�
SPRINGS F2Do SITE
10
A 5 RO
NLCO� cn CD
�c
CANTRELL
RD m m
PH
LA SERENA v PH
15
WAY
v
MARGARITA c�0
RD
Of
9�
9�
MEADOWS
PKWY
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS SHEET AFFECTING
THIS MAP IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE OF
THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECULA, IN E.C.S.
BOOK , PAGE . THIS AFFECTS ALL LOTS.
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S. \
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,,
37341-12
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 13 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
TRZ%c
IN] OO ° 37 341
LV /
BOUNDARY MAP
r
a'
Ia
237 23n- 6 o
m
- - M
lil
\ I I
/ \ I
i
LOT
SpNpE 4 e
-� Hoe �37 �34� ITO�
>/ Ho.
RB
4 , ti% / �G� LANDSCAPE" 33 \ \
c ° �-��� `��. ,. off\ I UQaC�� �JO 4�' I =�L,
\ \\
TTOLEA WAY
C10 L5 C9 „ R,15C;� N \
L6 (A=43° 34� 56 1 Q J �is ' 2t w� 26 PC \
(N84° 0� 606.66' R4)
�/ 0J �J �� 2 �� 1) �J° z 7 0.° 0.°� ��0.
- - - - -TL4 C6 L5 C7 L6 C1 YBROOK 7 q �L 20L - (N05° 41'51"IN M �' / C2 C3 L3 C4 LOT "A" (N834 -- 70. 00' R4) N27° 59' 06"E RAD PRC ' C5 ° R4)
H o ® �37 �3C� � n �------------ N 1'�N10° 25' 49"W RAD PRC N 300.21
� D � � o / o � e � o o �, - - / N13° 33' 24" E RAD PRC (75.81' R4)
TRACT MAP NO. 37341-12 - (75.84 R2 & R3)
z N (625. 52' RC (878.58' R4)
- - _ (625.59 R2 & R3) (878.53' R2 & R3)
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY T\ (2554.77' R4) "--577-
(5227.95' R4) (5227.88' R2 & R3)
(N89° 39' 10"W 5282.95' R4) (N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2 & R3) /
Fr�r�, 12 I F, A JR I I F,'� lr� � 2 7 F ll� JR 3 F ll� IR I
� /
FD 1" IP OPEN DN. 0.5' F'J\IJFil
NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS
POINT ON S'LY LINE OF R3 & R4
TABLE DATA
NAME
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
----
----
----------------
---------
Cl
L1
(N
38°26'11"
W RAD
26.00'
R4)
C2
L2
(N
12°09'22"
E RAD
150.04'
R4)
C3
L3
(N
89°59'34"
W
105.00'
R4)
C4
L4
(N
84008'57"
E
102.47'
R4)
C5
L5
(N
85055'39"
W
74.24'
R4)
C6
L6
(N
90000'00"
E
150.00'
R4)
C7
L7
(N
0-21'36"
E
2636.10'
R4)
C8
(N
0-21'34"
E
2636.07'
R2 & 133)
C9
L8
(N
0°33'48"
E
150.19'
R4)
C10
(N
0033'47"
E
150.19'
R2 & 133)
C11
DELTA
------
(15°49'44"
(38°24'55"
(10°26'15"
(13°32'58"
(19°59'24"
( 9°55'24"
( 4°04'21"
( 5008'45"
( 4°04'21"
( 9°55'24"
(38°26'11"
-RAD IUS-
300.00'
300.00'
1000.00,
1000.00,
500.00'
710.00'
790.00'
790.00'
750.00'
750.00'
790.00'
ARC
82.88' 134)
201.14' R4)
182.17' R4)
236.48' R4)
174.45' R4)
122.97' R4)
56.15' R4)
70.95' R4)
53.31' R4)
129.90' R4)
529.97' R4)
FD 1" IP W/PP "FRANK
& LAURA RICE 28029
DN. 0.5, NO REFERENCE
ACCEPTED AS POINT
ON SLY LINE OF
R3 & R4
SCALE: 1" = 200'
260 0 200 400
APRIL 2019
N
CD
o
IQ
\ w
N \
\ o \
z
Of
M \CO
N
w
ro
0
Z
(N61 ° 00' 53" W
37.90' 134)
L�
�Q ( 7
o
7
-00 28' 03.697"
CONVERGENCE ANGLE
AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 21
SHEET 3 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 , AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 2805323" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354.
LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES EXISTING LOT LINE
INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED
LS 8805, FLUSH TO BE SET PER
TRACT MAP 37368, MB 468/89-98.
O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE
TAGGED LS 8805, FLUSH.
- INDICATES CONTINUOUS OPERATING
REFERENCE STATIONS (CORS, AS NOTED).
CORS STATION "BILL"
N 2154995.0380�
E 6313564.1750
N88° 29' 38" E
5295.87' (GRID) 10
9 N88° 29' 38" E 6 g 00.�3'/
-(N88 29 37 E
20 2� 5296.39'
I4Q40
��
�0)
12
�a
cbl \;
N89° 26' 12"W I
55.00' y ,y r
BUTTERFIELD L8 `S`�S�
STAGE ROAD 1200 2� ��\O 11 \ 80619,E
I 202 s /a
44' CORS STATION "PMOB" \ \
-- �L N 2074153.1260��
I N /� �^? �k.P E 6375547.4700
WS
I 93a2°'
W
BASIS OF
BEARINGS DETAIL
N.T.S.
CORS STATION "P477"
N 2127663.6770
E 6298482.8020
0
cr
N
O)
CO
_o
N
z
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,,
37341-12
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 13 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
SCALE: 1" = 200'
260 0 260 400
SHEET INDEX MAP
APRIL 2019
a
0
z
—I in
M
i� a
\ I
mm
OLEA WAY� \ � � �o`o��� �,� \ \
o
\ I I I a t o a F i —� I�
�— SOMMERS 24 20
BEND _ 'LANDSCAPE" g T �� �� �� w �6 20 \
LOT A' �� 77 B ��� I� ' z 277 ,1
E� ��YBA00K TEAR ��
4 Q 4 PRIVATE STREET-DAYBROOK _ TERRAC DA PRIVATE STREE E � 1 I
H0. 37 3@ o
22 21 20 19
HB 46 0 / 23
se -go
i-
14
18 117 I 16��15 14
O
_PAf-� 12 1 \- RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY
_PAr� , J J
pIVJEil J 4'/93-9s
J
13
Lu I "A• I
12 11 10
_ \ 8 7 6 I 5 4 3 2/
� r
_pr f� % -PAIR � 3 -PAIR
iy,
SHEET 4 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 , AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 28° 53'23" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354.
LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES EXISTING EASEMENT LINE
INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS
OINDICATES SHEET NO.
EASEMENT NOTES
1
AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND
INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF GENERAL
TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED
DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
O.R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
2
3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED HEREON.
3
AN EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 23 FOR
PUBLIC ACCESS PURPOSES PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
4
MULTI -USE TRAIL EASEMENT AND FUEL MODIFICATION
t�
EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 23 PER TRACT
MAP 37368,MB 468/89-98.
5
PRIVATE 4' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT.
6
PRIVATE SLOPE & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT TO THE HOA (WIDTH VARIES) WITHIN
�i
LOTS 1 THROUGH 23.
7
AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS
FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DEDICATED HEREON.
8
AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER AND WATER PURPOSES
WITHIN LOT "A".
SCALE: 1" = 50'
50 0 50 100
Z
W
Lu
W
Lu
U)
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,,
37341-12
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 13 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
7ml/ C7 Flo® 3734=��
H] 0 0
I • f.: 1
1
-� CD" W I I
I
220
\may
o'Ul
28.00' \ - - - \ R6•�0
N/ _ `° cn I
' 1d=19° 44' 17" R=472.00' L=162.60' R5) C6 �� o 0 300.27' �, R4)
o q� (43. 00' R5 (N83° 34' 00' E of 7 g LOT A
OR
ra= °
R=500.00' L=174.45' R4)
d=19° PRIVATE STREET
59'24" R=528.00' L=184.21' - c
4=9°06'491, - -
L=83.98' - A=10°-52'-35 - -
ol L=100.23'
17
L8
81.86'
N89°39'10"W
109. 99,
Q11
ccI
wi 4' -
c
MI
N o 6
C> o
L7 NN 3 89,
\ W
w
N
N
N 0
120.22'
0 207.59'
0
r`' 123. 61'
TERRACE C2 L3
i DAYBROOK „ 213. 65 - - - _ i
N83 34'00 E --93,65' - - - - �5
120.00' w I
2 pi
I
z I ', 5
APRIL 2019
SHEET 5 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
CURVE TABLE
NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
a-------------------------------
Cl 123054'14" 46.00' 99.48'
::D C2 15000'38" 102.00' 26.72'
m C3 43035'42" 46.00' 35.00'
C4 43035'41" 46.00' 35.00'
Q C5 36042'51" 46.00' 29.48'
C6 (00015'06" 500.00' 2.20' 135)
Q C7 (15001'20" 300.00' 78.66' 135)
n
0
U
Z
Q
LINE TABLE
\ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH
\ 30.00' L1 (N 06026'00" W 53.93' R5)
L2 (N 61000'53" W 37.90' 134)
L3 N 81025'22" W 50.00'
\ "LANDSCAPE" \ \ L4 N 79041'12" W 28.66'
\ \ \ L5 N 88024'20" W 33.30'
\ \ L6 N 48053'04" W 8.30'
\ \ 42 L7 N 87022'57" E 28.65'
L8 N 89046'19" W 56.02'
\\\ I `�.51 L9 N 37027'53" E 27.35'
00
N
126�•go 3�5•��t I Flo
ao I
IZ
� � J
N
43 53 w R4 p I o I m L ��
I �I
28I 6� II I 0-
/ `� \ 7
2 / 183 63 4,-
3
o I 20, L5 \ v'.3g, C� �j w
\ W
48
Icv CA 6 A \\ O
/NI
O I
N �
'-�
p1 03,E '
- U2
N�8 23.55
5.51'
Z
60
r
�
rn
4
�0I
z
O
0
z
0
rn
N
rn
I � O
E
-P cfl
t_Tl M
Z o
0
� rn 1�3.NO 43. 56' - N82_35' 55" W o>
a, .55� _245.88'
153. 01, -
------- ------- _
o '� 49. - _N7 78 831 ��
8 ° 57' 29"W
� i \� I � •ems
120.85' 120.91' ,/ 175.74' ���170.03'
(878.58' R4)
(N89° 39' 10"W 2554.77' R4)
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY F, A JR 3 k
FJ\11E-J) y)5/7 J --J
(75.81' R4)
Tl f � J /
N
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,,
37341-12
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 13 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
APRIL 2019
SHEET 6 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
CURVE
TABLE
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
LINE TABLE
----
Cl
-----------
(15049'44"
--------
300.00'
--------
82.88'
R4)
SCALE: 1" = 50'
C2
(15 °49'
44"
328.00'
90.62'
R5)
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
C3
(4°31'29"
1028.00'
81.18'
R5)
----
---------------
---------
C4
(4005'19"
1028.00'
73.36'
R5)
50 0 50 100 L1
N
87022'57" E
28.65'
C5
1038'21"
972.00'
27.81'
L2
N
89046'19" W
56.02'
C6
5003'06"
972.00'
85.70'
L3
N
85033'21" E
19.25'
C7
2012'31"
972.00'
37.47'
L4
N
00000'26" E
32.56'
C8
1028'25"
972.00'
25.00'
L5
N
76043'17" E
24.20'
C9
2031'58"
328.00'
14.50'
L6
N
89039'10" W
30.16'
C10
7013'53"
276.00'
34.83'
L7
N
12009'22" E RAID
4.00'
C11
2028'05"
1000.00,
43.08'
C12
15021'53"
276.00'
74.01'
C13
15049'44"
272.00'
75.14'
17
24 W
N
c /
N �
0
L=128. 57' (�j
L=22035' 46" R=326. 00' ?
01� p=22° 35' 46L 31, N N \ \ Cz 77
A=38°25'30" R=3
OO.Op
-o �
I
o� p=22° 35' 46" R=276' L=108.8q� L�201. 19
10 , ry•j �\ I
- - CC12 - L7 8 24,55 -
�C�3_ \ Soo/' R=272.00 L=182.37' R5)
I cy ,
C9
o I
Q�1
1`
o`� /
14
ZCli
of
ti
H
W
8.62 1
N of
`
`1
_
N
�N81 ° 15'27"W
I
W
51. 75
132. 3
N78° 35 43;
W
W
i/)
_
190. 93
a
N Lo
N89° 39' 10"W
-8
112.99' w
107.53'
O
-8
111.85' �
101.99'
77.78'
F1/�J I J J
-pJVJEil J Ir/93-9J
•
°CCc
1
w
o to 2
28.00'
=187. 27' R5) �N89° 59' 34"W 105. 00' R5) C3
- 1p=10° 26,15" R=1028. 00 L o 0 o f o o I
� I _
=10 26' 15" R=1000. 00' L=182.17, R4) �' (N890 59' 34"W 105. 00' R4) N 061
C11 I C4
\ 1 (4,38° o (� �� ° C11 cv o - - - - -
TERRACE LOT "A" 7 $ �o (�=13 32 58 R=1000. Qp� o/ (d=19° 44' 17"
29 55„ pAYgROOK L=236.48' R4) N' R=472.00
d, p R=300.00' �� 972.00 L=177.07' I" ' N89° 59' 34"W 105.00' "' 4=13° 32'S8" L=162.60' R5)
_ 3g°24 RIVA7E STREET
R4) �o p=10° 26 15 R„ - -C7 76.60'- 28.40 - -C6- - - R=972.00' L=229.86 o / (4=
I _- _6° 45r C9 L=T14. 60'- d-6 r M o 19°
4= R=328.00' -C8 J ° , / 51 30 L=Tt6.35 N/ 59 24�� R=500.00' L=174.45' R4)
=20 23'07„ _ _ L=219.92'
7p \� N05 03 32 E_RAD
116. ,
-0=1-5°_29'"49,�- _C5 � 4=19°59'24" ,
2 / L=88.72' PRC� \\_ N08" 57' 23"W RAD \`\
D - - 2 / �d_9°02 R=528.00 L=184.21'
, 25,49�;W =p '4. 40' Zr \ N 2. 20� L=83. 9849 - - - - -
w N14 4' �� 11 \ 0 10 4 5 a� �I Q
Lo 13 of
co
Lo o
N 117
ZI N
_ 63.12'
51 p2 E� N88°38'17"W -
N79 9. 68 11 68.12'
5 , � 9
a=I
0 4. 51 _ N85° 33' 21"E 129. 24' N _ WI '` wI wi
12 ------
L3 - � �Ic
0- pot
61\,O N rn
r I N M I 7 N I C
�9 o I I o 0
10 0.• K6� w � ?S,p z Z z i N
_ 0 6'�
N80°32429' w N 4q,\\ 2,5 � L2 L1�_
113 g4• W I�� 6�
W
/W
w
N �
Q0
� N
ti
O N
O
O
M
v
Z p
N O
ui Z
N
Z
�
1083.96'
0 112.00'
112.99' o
O
O
ro o 112.00'
112.99' o
FD I" I P OPEN DN. 0.5'
NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS
POINT ON S'LY LINE OF R3 & R4
N O O
O M
O co 0 of w
� z
o �
O N
Z
O
� O
,-7
A. 43' N o0
M8° 36' 31"E
II 19.32�
36.24'
Q0
�- 113.99' 1
(625.52' R4)
�qO4 58,68, �Z
,�
N89° 39' 10"W
Ln 9> 6g, �� 99. 58'
3 4 M 72.74'
M
114.06' 113.99' _
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY N89° 39' 10"W 2554.77'
���f; J > FD 1" IP W/PP "FRANK -
& LAURA RCE 28029
DN. 0.5' , NO REFERENCE
ACCEPTED AS POINT
ON S'LY LINE OF
R3 & R4
N85 46'5511W -
113.11'
w
N
M U°`J4 %
' W
O
o 00N
O
0 000
Z GV O
� N O
z
L662.8 7'
-_F_N84° 27' 01 "W
81. 86'
26. 84' 34. 61' 28. 20N89° 39' 1011W o
VARIES J o
�- 115.01' 109.99,
9&I
FIMEj' 9 E-) / -J J - J 2
(878.58' R4)
p ll rTR I J
120.22'
207.59' �-
- 123.61
J�
r
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET 7 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
TRACT MAP NO,, 37341-12 1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 13 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2 . SEE SHEET NO . 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019 EASEMENT NOTES.
CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE (CONTINUED)
LINE TABLE
NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
NAME DIRECTION LENGTH ------------------------------- ------------------------------- c
- - - ----------- Cl ( 9055'24" 710.00' 122.97' R4) C14 7013'53" 276.00' 34.83' s`C
L2 (N 38026'116 " W RAID R4) C3 (15°49'44" 300.00' 82.88' R4) C16 0°34'47" 860.00' 8.770: SyFFT
L3 N 79038'12" E 51.99 C4 (15049'44" 328.00' 90.62' R5) C17 1023'57" 860.00' 21.00' \ 'YO, 3
SCALE: 1"= 50' L4 N 75003'07" E 47.77' C5 9055'24" 664.00' 115.00' C18 2040'24" 860.00' 40.13' \
� Sj
L5 N 82043' 02" W 47.59' C6 4004' 21 " 836.00' 59.42' C19 2022' 21 " 640.00' 26.50' 1100-
L6 N 71045'02" E 47.22' C7 10026'24" 836.00' 152.33' C20 ( 9055'24" 750.00' 129.90' R4)
50 0 50 100 L7 N 77 08'32 W 32.80' C8 9 55 24' 690.00' 119.50 C21 ( 4 04'21 750.00' 53.31 R4)
L8 N 85059'51" E 44.98' C9 4004'21" 810.00' 57.57' C22 15021'53" 276.00' 74.01' 3Q \
L9 N 12009'22" E RAD 4.00' C10 10026'24" 810.00' 147.59' C23 15049'44" 272.00' 75.14' `0
C11 10026'24" 860.00' 156.70' C24 ( 5008'45" 790.00' 70.95' R4) \
C12 4004'21" 860.00' 61.13' C25 ( 9055'24" 787.00' 136.30' R4) \
C13 9055'24" 640.00' 110.84' C26 ( 4004'21" 713.00' 50.68' R4) \ a
\ Gti �G�3LQC��
30
I
� � o
pp 24 d �,
�_- C25
l�-52�' • "LANDSCAPE" N N g
�I
(N84° 08' 57"E 606.66R4) o (N85 55 39 W o I C26 �-- (N90° 00' 00"W 150.00' R4) �� , q3° 34' S� 0.741 AC o 0
li of 01 C) to _ l� 19p'pp
I� �� C20 I
606.66' R4) L1 I ��
to (N840 OS' 57 E _ - M _ C21 "' (N90° 00' 00"E 150. 00' R4) �� �M _ ° 26� 11" p=22° 35' 46" R=326. 00, 2 6
-� of i i � lD'3a 2
° of o; SOMMERS BEND ;a __-\ ° o
(N84 08 57 E Cl �` I �� �� 13 q p=22 35 46 L=118.31' N C9
102. 47' R4) r L1 'r C2 ti I �� (N90° 00' 00" E 150. 00' R4) �� I / / / N79° 33' 36"E 210° • 13' w o L=38° 25' 30" R=300. 00' N
20.001-- - C8 - - - - - - - - - - - Nlgo 33' 36� 0 of =22° 35' 46" R=276' L=108. 84' � �201. 19,
52' L1 I'o _ 1 C22 - L9 /o
-o=o- N84° 08' 57" E 102. o ' ° � CIO q o
I o C9 o N90 00 00 W 150.00 o LOT 13
o A o .59' I' O _ C5 CD �'' L1 I� �� � I C7 -A l9° 33' 36"E 210• 75.13 C14
0 o Na4° 08 57 E� N o _ C6 _ DAYBROOK TERRACE _c� , o N
7 8-105.00'
N90° 00' 00" W 150.00' o f ' o I
30.o IoC I 11C1500'
102.66' - 11
N845EA=7° 33iO3n 24. 50' N90° .
L=84.34' 49.C18-CD C13 NI PRIVATE STREET /
L=88.00' _
o
I o z rn 15 o1i o
Z tCAI o o � Z o 16 /
00 <R I N "� Z C) O N �z
°O Xt
O co O O 8.
c� cn I N 22 21 N 20 19 18 17 1. 01 ' 62i
�O
o 23 = w o 70 w � ° O I m �n o 0 n w _55.67 N81 _
sC )2 p r^ ID m �S- � Z 00, 15 27"W
o A 13 Z
® � / / '� N85 27 02" E 51. 75' \
_ H 47.34' : 0,� 56.68 N78 35'43" � \ LJ.I
140. L8 68 n �-6i � � 96.35' � 97.06 � � W 93
g, L5 N80° 49'-'W - �Nl8 p1 39"E \ W
w 56 93� 66 ,8 O"#' � •� �E/ 98. 43 9 gg, 06 2
o0 00 133•�// N11°pA'31 N L7 //�(q°910A' w �LjSs w �, W
G N co 13 � N N w uJ
N�3/ / �, N Cy �0'' � 'o cr)
N 6 N Xt
`� 0 O 6'�
-- w N
W O C.i Cn O N 6�
0? CO N W W
64. A 2' N81 ° 38' „ N o c0
109. 46 to 19' 26 E �� 56 2 , W N
-
�-
N89° 39' 10"W
- - -
1148
- -Z
50.40'
39' 10"W 1083.96'
�--
o o
19.17
w
O
93.71'
93.96'
92. 77'
_N89°
109. 46'VARIES o 106.57' 106.89'
111.84'
4'
S• 84'
o
i '�' 128.50'
92.40' -
100.95'
94.69'
93.07'
112.55' 108.72' 106.89'
111.85'
101.99' \-
(N89° 39' 10"W 2554.77' R4)
\
� �� f� , � ]
3 4
FD 1" I P OPEN DN. 0.5'
\
FlJ\ll� I Zf
�. �
/\ J` 95 RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY �r�r�
NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS
POINT ON LYL LINE OF R3
� 1 r 2
& R4 �rr�
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
R2)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
134)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
R4)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
Lll
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
R3)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89°59'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
R3)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30010'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41058'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
uj
J �
a
1. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN 30 W' J
MILES OF MOUNT PALOMAR OBSERVATORY.
ALL PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS TRACT MAP NO,, 3 7341-12
� C7 J�-I
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE UAL IFORNIA ~ a
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PALOMAR
OBSERVATORY RECOMMENDATIONS,
ORDINANCE NO. 655.
2. THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN A
LIQUEFACTION HAZARD ZONE.
� 7 = � a
20
J
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 13 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, °a N
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, J
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. n �
J
L45--V-
L5
(N89° 39' 10"W
5282, 95' R4)-V
(N89° 39' 12"W
5282,87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
APRIL 2019 N.T.S.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' 134) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' R2)
I IN 89°39'12" W 319 80' R2► L56 (N 38015�21" E 655.50� R4) -5N L32
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
(N 38 15 19 E 655.48 R2)
MURRIETTA HOT I L46 ( N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' R4) L57 (N 0° 33' 48" E 485.01' R4) o --R\r
A Ob
PRINGS ROAD J (N 0020' 58" E 265.41 ' R2 ) (N 00 33' 47" E 485.01' R2) � "s I N -\]
I L47 (S 89°26'26" E 126.20' R4) L58 (N 89°39�10 W 55.00� R4) N M
- - (N 89 39 12 W 55.00 R2 & R3) �
- (N 89 ° 26' 26" W 126.19' R2 ) L59 (N 890 39' 10" W 601.73' R4) �� ���' _ T
T-S
L48 (N 0°33'34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39'12" W 601.61' R2)`p�=`��;�A, o ( N 0°33'34" E 76.01 ' R2) (N 89° 39'12" W 601. 50' PM 14/93-94) �s o� (; w NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC(nCj
�� L�L49 (N 48°26'50" W 30.47' R4)�a'ww N 48 ° 25' S0" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600.00' 653.17' R4) v �L23 s � t'�
L50 (N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' 134) (23° 23' 33" 1600. 00' 653. 24' R1 & R2) 1 �L22 U;
N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ► C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600. 00' 59.98' R4) L2 ' Vz
I A_o
(/)
°�' ' ' & R2) ozRORIPAUGH L51 N 89°26'26" W 500.00' R41 �r Z
VALLEY" C3 (352421600.00992.60 R4)
L52 N 003348E 1610.00R4) (35°3246" 1600. 00' 992.63' R1 & R2)OAD (N 034 04"E 1610.00' R1) J
o - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4) '�16 IN 38015'18"E 82.30' R2) IR2 o
66. l / L54 (N 0033'48" E 150.19' R4)
�� �'j�� /��� v� r�6• (N 0 33'47"E 150.19' R2 8 R3) �12 113 ��4� L15 o
L41
oo L8 Lg
rG Aclr Flo. 37 34� _3
L53 Ln `
4 i 6r/ �``'R`�o� Vic, 465.13' � R 3;, E l� / 0
N� 5 �� ��h� �� 651 l36 RZl 1 Q ° e p p cl
N53°53'32Q�R D 4 � h. / �---/� �� f
�S 7n acir Flo° y ���� m
�,�
z
hd cry o,
L� 11 v
L7
Lf� C« �7
El-
L�
55' -
55'=
LIVLI -
�G3La��
m
z
NO.
�I oMo
M -�-
zz�o?o FD 1"IP W/PP "FRANK
& LAURA RICE 28029 /j \ 97 Q Q 97 03�77 6�3C� 6 -
DN. 0.5 , NO REFERENCE -
V) (422. 01' R4 H o / - I ACCEPTED AS POINT - V�
N89° 26' 26"W) L ON S'LY LINE OF
L49-
L�J
SEE
DETAIL "A "
20 t
29
N8(422
°
260' "2
L48
7 H0. �37 341== z
R3 &
R4,�
_L'URIC
L47
FD 8"X8" STONE
-
_ SOMMERS BEND= -
MON. --- -
„
FD 1 IP OPEN DN. 0.5
(75.81' I
L59 J
MK'D "P 17" ON STY p NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED
G3 Q3�13C� o POINT ON SLY LINE OF R3 &
AS
R4
TRACT MAP NO. 37341-12
(75. 84' R2
L45-
SIDE UP 1.2' PER
R2, R3 & R4
g S 8 e S
40
(625.52' R4)
625.59R2 & R3
(878.58' R4) �
(878.53' -
- -
- - - I
- �
_ _ _
- (5227.95' 134)
R2 & R3)
(5227.88' R2 & 133)
l _/
pAR 1 1
RANCHO PAUBA
� 2
BIOUNDARY (N89° 39' 10'W 5282.95' R4)
pr1f� z1 3
(N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2
I
& R3)
\
� /
�l�ll.0 1 '
-FAR
pJ�JI� 15r3�
, _p, �
�J�ll� 1 �7� �r1;�, 12
pJ�J1J 1 / 3- )�
�r1;� 1
1 �r�;�
r'
�r�r� / �r�r�
° 3- )5
93-3--3 )
57-5�3
�, )��71 l� '
PJII=
I� a
6, m
o m >_
oa
o =�
U z
z=)
ao
12 [ifm
L�
j
1
M \ \
C
�
" .7 (N
p
co L� 11
N
M �
N 1
o
z
J
on- u
M
c.fl
N \
YJ
M
N\ �
Z �
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, TO BE
SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37341-11 MB 2_
4. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
5. 0 INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, TO BE
SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37341-11 MB L
6. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER
RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE 461.21.
7. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 17.510 ACRES GROSS.
8. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
9. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
10. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 24 LOTS.
11. INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
12. RAD INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
13. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
14. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
15. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
16. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
17. R5 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37341-11 MB /_
18. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
19. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED---------------- AS INST.
NO
20. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑X MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6
FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72,
R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7
FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
p
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'.
C)
8
FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD.
AND RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9
FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10
FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
w
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34, J
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
o
11
FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12
FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
o
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
BOOK T PAGE
TOTAL NUMBERED LOTS: 22
TOTAL LETTERED LOTS: 1
TOTAL NET AREA: 11.865 ACRES
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 14.745 ACRES
OWNER'S STATEMENT
WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY
PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO
SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS
SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: LOT "A"
FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS
AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES AS SHOWN HEREON.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG
SOMMERS BEND TO THE PUBLIC. THE OWNER OF LOTS 20 AND 21
ABUTTING THIS HIGHWAY AND DURING SUCH TIME WILL HAVE NO
RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERAL EASEMENT OF TRAVEL. ANY
CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OR WIDTH THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION
THEREOF SHALL TERMINATE THIS DEDICATION AS TO THE PART VACATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 18,
INCLUSIVE, LOT 20 AND LOT 21 AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION
IS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC DRAINAGE
PURPOSES AS SHOWN HEREON WITHIN LOT 21.
WE HEREBY RETAIN LOT "A" INDICATED AS "PRIVATE STREET" FOR
PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR
SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-13
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS
CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE
INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,
ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
ON BEFORE ME,
NOTARY PUBLIC PERSONALLY APPEARED
APRIL 2019
TAX BOND CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $
HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE
PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND
ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE
TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A
LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, AND SAID
BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
DATE:
A
CASH BOND
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE
THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN
INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED
THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT
BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S),
OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED,
EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE
AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN LOT 21 INDICATED AS "OPEN SPACE" FOR
PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, SIGNATURE
ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN LOT 19 AND LOT 20 INDICATED AS
"LANDSCAPE" FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF
OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS
WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE SLOPE & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 14 FOR
PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS,
ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT
FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
("DISTRICT''), A PUBLIC AGENCY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER
AND BY VIRTUE OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT LAW OF 1911,
ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF
WAY TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, ENLARGE, RECONSTRUCT, REMOVE AND
REPLACE, OPERATE, INSPECT, REPAIR, IMPROVE AND RELOCATE SEWER,
WATER, AND RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES, ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND DESIGNATED "SEWER, WATER, AND
RECYCLED WATER EASEMENT" HEREON, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT
OF ACCESS TO AND FROM SAID EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXERCISING THE RIGHTS GRANTED IN SAID EASEMENT. OWNER RETAINS
THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENT AREA PROVIDED THAT OWNER SHALL
NOT CONSTRUCT OR ERECT BUILDINGS, MASONRY WALLS, MASONRY
FENCES AND OTHER STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS, OR PLANT OR
GROW TREES OR SHRUBS, OR CHANGE THE SURFACE GRADE OR INSTALL
PRIVATELY -OWNED PIPELINES WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT
OF DISTRICT.
OWNER:
WOODS I DE 05S, LP,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BY-
NAME: CHRIS CHAMBERS
TITLE: VICE PRESIDENT, WDS GP, INC.
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
AS GENERAL PARTNER
NAME:
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE
PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS:
COMMISSION EXPIRES:
COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, BY ITS CITY CLERK, RANDI JOHL, HEREBY
APPROVES THE TRACT MAP AND ACCEPTS THE OFFER
OF DEDICATION OF LOT "A" MADE HEREON FOR PUBLIC
UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS
AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY AND SERVICE VEHICLES.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF ABUTTERS
RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG SOMMERS BEND AS DEDICATED.
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
20—.
TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE
SHEET 1 OF 7 SHEETS
RECORDER'S STATEMENT
FILED THIS DAY OF , 20-
AT .M IN BOOK OF MAPS, AT PAGES
AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA.
NO.
FEE:
PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK -RECORDER
DEPUTY
SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS
BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE
AT THE REQUEST OF WOODSIDE 05S, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP IN JANUARY 2018. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL
DEPUTY MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS
INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP AND THAT THE
MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO
BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS
TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. THIS SURVEY IS
TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS
OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE
PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY,
MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXES, OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES NOW A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED
TO BE $
DATE: , 20.
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
ME
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
DATE:
W I LL I AM ROHAL, L. S. 8805
DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE
SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR
OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED:
LAND SUS\
�\ \NM Roy F�
v �� q<,
\F CF. CA1-\F09
I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF SEVEN (7)
SHEETS HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND FOUND TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED
ON THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 37341 AS FILED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ON JUNE 20, 2018, THE EXPIRATION DATE BEING JUNE 20, 2021.
THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY
REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, AND I AM
SATISFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY DATED:
OF CALIFORNIA FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
O.R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
2020
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE 3' PUBLIC UTILITY KRIS R. WINCHAK L.S. 6240
EASEMENT AS DEDICATED. EXP. 3-31-20
(AS DELEGATED)
HEREBYWE ALSO ACCEPT
THE
DRAINAGE PURPOSESASDEDICATED. MENT FOR PUBLIC CITY OF TEMECULA
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'S
ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT
DATED: 2020 I HEREBY STATE THAT THE EASEMENT DEDICATED ON THIS MAP TO THE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT IS HEREBY ACCEPTED AND THE
BY: DISTRICT CONSENTS TO THE RECORDATION THEREOF BY ITS DULY
RANDI JOHL AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
CITY CLERK, CITY OF TEMECULA
DATE-
SHEILA ZELAYA, BOARD SECRETARY OF THE EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THEREOF
SOILS REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66490 OF THE
STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, A PRELIMINARY SOILS
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF CA. PROJECT NO. 10967.108
ON JUNE 25, 2018, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECLULA.
FOR PATRICK A. THOMAS,
CITY ENGINEER
AND J^
- o
�\ No. L.S. 6240 /zmt�
0�
SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SBM
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
132)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
R4)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
R4)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
L11
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10°59'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30010'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41058'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
133)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
R3)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
e
L45��
L 5 9
�(N89* 39' 10" W
5282.95' R4)-A-
(N89° 39' 12"W
co 5282.87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
N.T.S.
APRIL 2019
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR
BOUNDARY MAP,
BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR
SHEET INDEX MAP.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' R4) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' 132)
I (N 89°39'12" W 319.80' 132) L56 (N 38015'21" E 655.50' 134)
(N 38° 15' 19" E 655.48' R2) L32
MURRIETTA HpT L46 ( N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' R4) L57 (N 00 33' 48" E 485.01' R4) o �r
SPRINGS ROAD j
(N 0° 33' 47" E 485.01' R2) "� °b
I (N 0 20'S8" E 265.41' R2)
=- - L58 (N 890 39' 10" W 55.00' R4)
L47 (S 89°26'26" E 126.20' R4) (N 89°39'12" W 55.00' R2 & R3)Cj
- - - - (N 89 ° 26' 26" W 126.19' R2 ) L59 (N 890 39' 10" W 601. 73' 134) Ira
L48 (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' 134) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.61' 132)
/ I A, o (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' 132 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 50' PM 14/93-94) �; �, �1
I NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC- "' � �� LI)
gL49 IN 48°26'50" W 30.47' R4) ____ __ _ �� r a'� w LLI
�' w
1 �° p �? (N 48025' S0" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600. 00' 653.17' R4) v �L23 s � t'� C)
L50 (N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' R4) (23° 23' 33" 1600.00' 653. 24' R1 & R2) 21 �L22 U; ���
(N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ) C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600.00' 59.98' 134) �" r o (/)
- - - RORIPAUGH L51 (N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500
\ ° 0' ' ' 5992 R4) z
& R2) j /r Z o
C3 (35VALLEY I I .00' R41 0242„ 1600. 009. v Z
\ ROAD L52 (N 0033'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600.00' 992.63' R1 & R2)
��J ' (N 0°34'04"E 1610.00' R1) �� J
O - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4)
�I IN 38015;18"E 82.30' R2) �� l� o 28�,���
66 / L54 (N 0 33 48" E 150.19' R4) 6
1 (N 0°33'47"E 150.19' R2 8 R3) L13 L14� L15 o �p L43
� �12�- - - �� -■/ o L41
\,R L5 I -
�-�4mQC� Uhl 00
�4/ �N81°36'16"E 1 37 342
J �Ar/,ih�o 1 73 R4)
5 �cl) /7,�4�°ti tN81°36
��0
_Cy5l3RZI
Q��
N53°53'32Q�R D 4 h�hcb
�•LQC�'T H 0
7QAC� H0°
�s m
Q
\
\.r� � o
z
<
1 „ 11 o 20 I �� i \ �o ® �� ��� \��\ �o
L� v
L7
Lf� (10
« �7
L�
55' -
55'=
BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD
�7 M
20
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-13
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
I D
VG3Q(r, 'ff I HOO ® I 377 �C� o I I
m
Z
110
LI iQ�� 11Vo®
� w N
TJI�oMo
zz�� FD 1 IP W/PP 'FRANK
`1 Z G Q C� H0. 37734e3�3� o & LAURA RCE 28029 /j \ \ cF Q Q � 97 0)� �� no -
DN. 0.5, NO REFERENCE -
� V) (422.01' R4 H o / o I ACCEPTED AS POINT - V�
N89° 26' 26"W) L ON S'LY LINE OF
QN
L49-
L � L�J
SEE
DETAIL "A "
29
(422.00' R2 L48 \URIC 7 H0. 37 3141=�z R3 & R4,�
N89° 26' 26"W) _
- - L51 _- _�i/ Fl o S e
-
L47 SOMMERS BEND - FD 1" IP OPEN DN. 0.5
FD 8 %8 STONE MON.AS (75. 81 R4)
L59 MKT "P17" ON STY POINT NOREFERENCEES LREN INEAOFER3 E& R4 �� �� e (75. 84' R2 & R3)
SIDE UP 1.2 PER TRACT MAP NO. 37341-13
L45 R2, R3 & R4 (625.52' R4) (878.58' R4) 6
IN o � 0 625.59R2 & R3)� (878.53' R2 & R3)
(5227.95' 134) (5227.88' R2 & R3)
PAR_ RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY (N89° 39' 10"W 5282.95' R4) (N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2 & R3)
PJ\ll.1 ' �I�JJ� J 3� P1�Jl= 1 _J/ Fr1R , 12 P1mJ 1 ' / ) - 95 PAR 1 1 PA;R , P111J Pr1R / Pr1f�
SHEET 2 OF 7 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, TO BE
SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368, MB 468/89-98.
3. INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, TO BE
SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37341-12 MB / -
8 TRACT MAP 37341-14 MB / - AS NOTED.
8 TRACT MAP 37341-15 MB-/-- - , AS NOTED.
4. p INDICATES SET 1"IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, FLUSH
5. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
6. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 14.745 ACRES GROSS.
7. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
8. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
9. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 22 LOTS.
10. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
11. RAD INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
12. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
13. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
14. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
15. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
16. R5 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37341-12 MB /
17. R6 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37341-14 MB /
------------
18. R7 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37341-15 MB /
19. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
20. C.C. 8 R's,RECORDED----------------AS INST.
NO.--------
-
21. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑x MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 81 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD p
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'. C)
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD.
AND RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34, J
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'. o
V)
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER o
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
AULD RDo
f
MURRIETq HOT
SPRINGS RD S/TE
QoJ
R�
NiCO�pS
cn Co
CANTRELL
RD
m rn
LA SERENA
v
15
WAY
v
MARGARITA
�0
RD
Ol
9�
9�
MEADOWS
PKWY
oc
LC)u
00 a
.I- c
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-13
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS SHEET AFFECTING
THIS MAP IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE OF
THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECULA, IN E.C.S.
BOOK , PAGE . THIS AFFECTS ALL LOTS.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY MAP
TABLE DATA
NAME DIRECTION LENGTH
APRIL 2019
NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
L1
(N
05041'51"
W
70.00'
134)
C1
(14010'30"
710.00'
175.65'
R4)
L2
(N
00008'57"
E
226.19'
134)
C2
(29044'28"
790.00'
410.07'
R4)
L3
(N
00033'48"
E
30.00'
134)
C3
(32059'24"
710.00'
408.81'
R4)
L4
(N
89039'10"
W
319.78'
R4)
C4
(17059'00"
790.00'
247.96'
R4)
L5
(N
89026'26"
W
126.20'
R4)
C5
(5051'03"
790.00'
80.67'
R4)
L6
(N
00059'25"
E
2. 00'
134)
C6
(14010'30"
750.00'
185.55'
R4)
L7
(N
75°15'56"
W
50.01'
134)
C7
(29044'28"
750.00'
389.31'
R4)
L8
(N
74059'36"
E
129.20'
134)
C8
(32059'24"
750.00'
431.84'
R4)
L9
(N
72001'00"
W
50.00'
134)
C9
(17059'00"
750.00'
235.40'
R4)
L10
(N
90000'00"
E
190.00'
134)
C10
( 5051'03"
750.00'
76.59'
R4)
L11
(N
0021'36"
E
2636.10'
134)
(N
0021'34"
E
2636.07'
R2 a
133)
L12
(N
0033'48"
E
150.19'
134)
(N
0033'47"
E
150.19'
R2 a
133)
I
Ho® 37 34�-�o
55'
(N89026' 26"W 422.01' 134)
(N89° 26' 26"W 422.00' 132)
- (N89° 26' 26"W 500.00' 134)
7G �3LaC 7 HO.
L5
-� w
0
al
as 3=2
C= N
WI
J LS
M
N Z
ZI
L4
I I [rV(] M. q� C� no /
" aN " A6
71RQC 7 MOO ® Sal �366�=�6
`° S� W I
SHEET 3 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 , AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 2805323" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354.
LEGEND
INDICATES
BOUNDARY
-
INDICATES
CENTER LINE
INDICATES
LOT LINE
INDICATES
EXISTING LOT LINE
INDICATES
FOUND AS NOTED.
■
INDICATES
1" IRON PIPE TAGGED
LS 8805,
FLUSH TO BE SET PER
TRACT MAP
37368, MB 468/89-98.
0
INDICATES
SET 1" IRON PIPE
TAGGED LS
8805, FLUSH.
INDICATES
CONTINUOUS OPERATING
REFERENCE
STATIONS (CORS, AS NOTED).
CORS STATION "BILL"
N 2154995.0380�
E 6313564.1750
N88° 29' 38" E
� � � 5295.87' (GRID) 10 j lG �pl
�SOM� RS BE _ _ - - g N88 29 38� E �6
M _ R4) _ D 6 5296.39 ND _ C6 _ _, 8 C8 �9 -(N84° 08' 57"E 606.66 _ _ _ `�(N88 29 37 E 0.
Cl C7 C3 _ C9 - L10 C10 504 19 R4) _ - _ - -
C, (N84 08 57 E �O �� 5296.39
�a �- 49 LOT A DTAYBROTOK TERRACE R2 & R3) wN
ui
C2 ti Cq L10 C5 L1 I
FD 8"X8" STONE MON. o
MK'D T17"ON STY
SIDE UP 1.2' PER
R2, R3 & R4
(546.73' 134)
55' 1
F A I l ^ RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY
93- 9 J -pNjFil 1 53-,/
- - - - 9
TRACT MAP NO. 37341-13
(N890 39' 10"W 2673.18' ; R4)
(NO° 33' 34" E 76.01' R4)
(NO° 33' 34"E 76.01' R2)
LOT A
DETAIL 'A'
�(N00°33'34"E
1 . 0 1 ' R4)
SOMMERS BEND
L6
Cl
I
ENO° 33' 34" E RAD
A
O
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY
-00 28' 03.697"
22 I �� 120
�� Q�
Lo(.0
J 4R 377134� I
o mJ��
12
CV
2 � P'/�T-� , 1 1
FN1f7i, 14/93-95
CONVERGENCE ANGLE
AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 21
SCALE: 1" = 200'
200 0 200 400
co
N89° 26' 12"W
55.00,A 9 N "'
BUTTERFIELD L12 , s`�6�`s?
STAGE ROAD �?DO 121 ��� 11 8p6 �
�B
CO. �� CORS STATION "PMOB" \
N 2074153.1260�� r
E 6375547.4700
nj � O�
I �w �1, 0Q 93a2p,ap' l
°13,32W
BASIS OF
BEARINGS DETAIL
S STATION "P477"
127663.6770
298482.8020
N.T.S.
0
Lo
N
co
0
00
N
z
SCALE: 1" = 200'
200 0 260 400
__j
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-13
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
SHEET INDEX MAP
I
'rINAC 'r H00 ® 37 30 o HIP ko o / @ 6 o0
I 7rLQcc, 7 I I
Q
Q
w
J
W
U
Z
f
"LAN SOCAPE---
7RAC7 GAO.
G�C3 342/ 77 3=8 a
12
APRIL 2019
UIRaC"T H0 ® �� ��� ��� I I o I I 'TaATT
�
I
I UIRAC U M0 ® Sal 34� =fig \
—_\ SOMMERSS BEND _--�--
-- - -
211AYBROO
OPEN SPACE
17 22 7
'OPEN SPACE'
FAIR, J 7 1
Pi S REEl D K T ERRA�F -
P � �
14
n15
12 13 10
16- 6
_PAJR , 2
----9
_pAJR, % I FA.R,
J j`J-
9 / 8
_ - - - - - - LOT ADAYBROOK TERRACE ---
LOT "A" -
- -
2 1 2�3 22 I 2� 120 n� �B � �T
3
5 ]
7 6 5 '�4R I�377�3��=U
FAJF� , 12 ' FAF� , J J
SHEET 4 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 , AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 2805323" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354.
LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES EXISTING EASEMENT LINE
INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS
OINDICATES SHEET NO.
EASEMENT NOTES
1 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND
INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF GENERAL
TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED
DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
O.R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
2 3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED HEREON.
3 AN EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE
AND LOT 22 FOR PUBLIC ACCESS PURPOSES PER
TRACT MAP 37368, MB 468/89-98.
4 MULTI -USE TRAIL EASEMENT AND FUEL MODIFICATION
EASEMENT WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 19, INCLUSIVE
AND LOT 22 PER TRACT MAP 37368, MB 468/89-98.
5 STORM DRAIN EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 21 AND LOT 22
FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF FLOOD CONTRO
FACILITIES PER TRACT MAP 37368, MB 468/89-98.
6 PRIVATE SLOPE & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
TO THE HOA (WIDTH VARIES) WITHIN
LOTS 1 THROUGH 14, INCLUSIVE.
7 PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT WITH LOT 21 DEDICATED
HEREON.
8 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS
FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DEDICATED HEREON.
9 AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER AND WATER PURPOSES
WITHIN LOT "A".
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-13
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
CURVE TABLE
NAME DELTA RADIUS
--------
Cl (17059'00" 790.00'
C2 (5051'03" 790.00'
SCALE: l" = 50' C3 5 ° 51 ' 03" 836.00'
C4 17059'00" 836.00'
C5 17059'00" 810.00'
50 50 100 C6 5051'03" 810.00'
C7 5051'03" 860.00'
C8 17059'00" 860.00'
C9 5011'05" 860.00'
C10 0039'44" 860.00'
C11 3035'34" 860.00'
C12 7031'42" 860.00'
C13 (17059'00" 750.00'
C14 (5051'03" 750.00'
C15 (17059'00" 713.00'
C16 ( 5051'03" 713.00'
7]
Y- C15
C13
O
m
�M
M
r
Z
13
APRIL 2019
0.10
SHEET 5 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
247.96' R4) LINE TABLE
80.67' R4)
85.37' NAME DIRECTION LENGTH
262.39' ------------------------------
254.23 L1 IN 05041'51" W 70.00' R4)
82.71' L2 N 38014'36" W 4.83'
87.82' L3 N 55012' 10" W 2.64'
269.93' L4 N 72042'06" W 40.78'
77.82' L5 N 31041'48" W 8.34' o
10.00, L6 N 87019'10" W 111.68'
53.93'
113.00' OLEA WAY
235.40' R4)
7.59' R4)
223.79' R4)
72.81' R4) n \ 3
o I
I �
I
� I
nrn
I
a
to
_ 606.66' R4)
(N84° 08' 57" E -
� to
606.66, R4) - ------- Io
(N90° 00' 00" E 190.00' R4) C16 I, (N84'° OS� - - 4)
PER TRACT o I I � � -
37341-15 M o I I � �� - SOMMERS BEN 606.66' R4) 01 -
�� C1_ T (N84° 08' 57�� E - 20.0
190.00' R4) A 504.19 - - - - - I
_ _ - - (102. 52R5) � PER TRACT
N 31341-12
- 606.66'
I'� 1.454 ACRES -N84° 08' 57" E- - - - PER TRACT o o- - -
Cl (N90° 00' 00" E 190. 00' R4) 1 �� C2 -� �,9PE I SPACE" - - - - 504.13' 37341-12 . o 0 02. 59 R5)
LOT 606.66' (102-66
N90° 00' 00" E 190 00' _C6- - - A AN84° 08' 57- 61 �- - - - -
of
of
i
M 49.67'
90° 00' 00" E
-1-
oI
DAYBROOK TERRACE
�C4
190° 00' 00" E 190. 00'
"'
C3
o
_
PRIVATE' STREET
o
o
C8
'--C12--
--C11-
N90 00 00 E 190.00
C7
-Cg----46.50'-
--70.00'
----120.00'---
L6
4.04' d
137.00'
rn
ro
c
N
ti
o
Q
7
W
v
M
0
Z
133.44'
N850 08' 22" E _
---
_
129.40' 3.01'
0
134.37'
6
0
O
0
0
0 74.82' 55.55'
Z N86° 10' 54'E N85° 33' 19"W
71.81'
L5
rn
c
131.94'
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY
rn
a 5
co
K' 132.25'
Z - - - N85° 00' 43" E - -
w
oLOT ..A..
- --120.00'
N84° 08' 57" E
110.00'-
W
504.0 606.66'
504.00' _ - -
- - -105.00"
z o
o 3 `o
v� Ln
Ln
Ln 4
o 0�. w
M412p.a2'
Ln w N890 39' 1011W
o
140.12'
1632.45'
(N89° 39' 10"W 2673.18' R4)
FAR, 12
120.71 '
_ 70.80'
N89° 22' 08" E
74.82'
0
co
1481.64'
110.65'
2
�``9.0g,
N7 °
co ; �1�6218„W
105.62'
---
L
A
0
N
Z
1 0
0
Ln
102.60'
N84° 24' 15" E -
99.44'
m
WT
0
wLTI
O
10 /
O
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-13
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
APRIL 2019
1
LINE TABLE
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
SCALE: 1° = 50'
----
-----------------
---------
L1
(N
72001'00" W
50.00' R4)
L2
N
86014'28" W
19.13'
50 50 100
L3
N
38035'03" W
3.59'
L4
N
81056'37" W
24.34'
v12AC 'T ISO° 1177IsItT-T6
0
0
ABRONIA H] 0
�4 \ COURT
�Lp \
I � o
g I a
_
(p=32° 5912411 R 787.00 \ L=453 R4) �
o �
(p=32° 59' 24� R=750.00'4R4 _
\ _
36 41 ,� SOMMERS BEND
_ ° 59' 24" R=710.00' _
- C14 0\\ 1N34° 5g 36� / o\ / (p 32 L 408.81' R4)
LOT 21 _ _ "OPEN SPACE'- - 1.454 ACRES
C1' �\ 12g,2C� R41 p=32° 59124 " R=690.00' L=397
SHEET 6 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
CURVE
TABLE
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
----
Cl
-----------
(17°59'00"
--------
790.00'
--------
247.96'
134)
C2
(29044'28"
790.00'
410.07'
134)
C3
15033'58"
836.00'
227.13'
C4
17059'00"
836.00'
262.39'
C5
15033'58"
810.00'
220.06'
C6
17059'00"
810.00'
254.23
C7
17059'00"
860.00'
269.93'
C8
15033'58"
860.00'
233.65'
C9
3035'34"
860.00'
53.93'
C10
6007'57"
640.00'
68.50'
C11
3057'48"
860.00'
59.49'
C12
(17059'00"
750.00'
235.40'
134)
C13
(29044'28"
750.00'
389.31'
134)
C14
(29044'28"
713.00'
370.10'
134)
C15
(17059'00"
713.00'
223.79'
134)
- - o lN1A° 5gI 36 6=32° 59' 24" R=664. 00' L=382. ' \ \ \ C' -� - M
2
-�a �, o'\ 8 9 DAYBROOK TERRACE �_ \ o \ \ \ of
15$ - ° R=640.00 o
5g� 36„E �(a� p=32 59 24- _ °_ L=368.50' SOT �A„ l�. 1 a \ Cl 0l
/ N� ° 5g' 36E 15a• o` _ 3 25 44" L=150.00 A=13 25' 43" L=150.00�
C5 0 Sg pFsq�,
3 � � 11C• �'_
- � 48.1a
C8 �11
O
o
O
'J
p
O
14
Z
LA
J
A
�
W
�g
W
s
0
_
�
T
rn
cr
124.26' -
LLI
- -
- N84°30,10"W
W
(n
__ _� _N87°
--
55' 10"W 423. 21'
A
123.38' �-
A
VARIES A
J
124. 84,
F A.F�
FlJ\iJ-,D--1 J
----9
13
49.96'
63.62'
N87° 24' 34" E
_N89° 10'
34.40'
79.97' v;
A
114.07'
12
105.87'
N89° 24' 54"W
105.16'
93.68'
11
101. 12'
_ N83°59'17"W
- 0. 71 ' i
1632.45'
(N89° 39' 10"W
FAR , A
0
0
92.19' '�' -
\ �I
o�
41 cd/
\ _
10 \ ti 41 oo/ �� o M, C6-------
HIC
76.26'
N83_36' 27" E _ L 4
N89° 39' 10"W L
`v L3�
96.94' v
2673.18' R4)
FIVl� 127,/57-5
\ \ \ LO -C4 cD
6 \
51�49
_ 1 03.0p,
M
122. 71'
N88° 25' 28" E
1481.64' t
3 4 �
130.89'
C7
A=7°31'42'� -
L=113. 00,
N87°19'10"W
L2
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY
-p1�JR � 3
137.00'
4.04'
FAR 1
-
I N
tCD
IQ
N
\
C9
ro
z 133.44' ^ _
N850 08' 2-V E_ -
T
SCALE: 1" = 50'
50 0 50 100
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-13
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
L22
LOT "A11
DETAIL 'A'
(N00° 33' 34" E
1.01' 134)
SOMMERS BEND
�L2
C1 4-,
21
I
LN00° 33' 3411E RAID
Mi°- c"T H0® 3734�=�z
/ I
(N48026' 5011W 30.47' R4)
° " o o I SEE DETAIL 'A'
(N48 25 50 W 30.48 R2)
I(N89°26'26"W 422. 01 1 R4)
(N89° 26' 2611W 422.00' 132)
o o C20 _
(N89° 26' 2611W 500. 00' R4) , . /
M "o
-� 57.66'�� C2
of
to
MI
tnipQ. 9cz/ 9Gllw i to
UnAcu MO.
Mii o3� 03 0
pl�R' J 7
FIM) J 41'/9 -95
I v V Au J I VIYL IVIVIY.
MK' D "P1711 ON S' LY
SIDE UP 1.2' PER
R2, R3 & R4
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY -
N6n°R„!35• 00\
\IYVJ JJ IV 11 LV I J. 10 RIJ
SHEET 7 OF 7 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
LINE TABLE
CURVE TABLE NAME DIRECTION LENGTH
---- ---------------- ---------
NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC L1 N 00033'48" E 30.00'
-------------------------------
L2 (N 00°59'25" E 2.00' R4)
C1 (14°10'30" 710.00' 175.65' R4) L3 (N 75°15'56" W 50.01' R4)
C2 (14°10'30" 750.00' 185.55' R4) L4 N 00021'22" E 30.00'
C3 15033'58" 836.00' 227.13: L5 N 89026'26" W 11.52'
C4 15033'58" 810.00, 220.06L6 N 51053'59" E 32.02'
C5 15033'58" 860.00' 233.65' L7 N 00033'34" E 40.85'
C6 10008'57" 103.00' 18.25' L8 N 44°26'26" W 35.36'
C7 110017'55" 73.00' 140.53' L9 N 10°42'31" E 30.04'
C8 3057'48" 860.00' 59.49' L10 N 48°49'27" W 33.80'
C9 (3046'51" 710.00' 46.85' R4) L11 N 50°50'50" E 38.02'
C10 (9047'42" 135.00' 23.08' R4) L13 N 81048'10" W 23.76'
C11 (27010'29" 105.00' 49.80' R4) L13 N 81°48'49" W 36.74'
C12 9055'28" 710.00' 122.98' L14 N 71°27'02" W 35.74'
C13 (0028'11" 710.00' 5.82' R4) L15 N 33°31'41" E 12.24'
C14 11039'01" 790.00' 160.63' L16 N 89°26'26" W 32.01'
C15 2°23'S5" 790.00' 33.07' L17 (N 70008'12" E 30.00' R4)
C16 1057034" 810.00' 27.70' L18 (N 00033'48" E 30.00' R4)
C17 66041'20" 73.00' 84.97' L19 N 46029'10" E 41.27'
C18 43036'35" 73.00' 55.56' L20 N 01°24'00" W 27.48'
C19 9027'45" 100.00' 16.52' L21 N 89°26'26" W 35.96'
C20 (14010'26" 787.00' 194.69' R6) L22 (N 0°33'34" E 76.01' R4)
(N 0033'34" E 76.01' R2)
I
JJ I O > n o
a o
>- o PER TRACT \ ��
37341-14
N Q 1 \\
D
R4
(d=29° 44' 28" = =713.00'
L=310
z.10 cw,
o 0
SIMMERS
L=173.42' R6) (p=16° 29' 34" L=215.89 R o
-�
Z
W
W
U)
w
w
U)
124.26'
N84°30'10"W
1632.45' �-
RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY
FAR ,
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSTRAINT SHEET
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
132)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
R4)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
Lll
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30010'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41058'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
R3)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UJ
J �
a
1. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN 30 W' J
MILES OF MOUNT PALOMAR OBSERVATORY.
ALL PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS TRACT MAP NO, 37341-13
� a J�-I
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE UAL IFORNIA ~ a
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PALOMAR
OBSERVATORY RECOMMENDATIONS,
ORDINANCE NO. 655.
2. THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN A
LIQUEFACTION HAZARD ZONE.
� 7 = � a
20
J
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 14 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, °a N
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, J
RANGE 2 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. n 00
J
L45--V-
L5
(N89° 39' 10"W
5282, 95' R4)-V
(N89° 39' 12"W
5282,87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
APRIL 2019 N.T.S.
10
CITY LIMIT � � � )
\ \ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' 134) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' R2)
IN 89°39'12" W 319 80' R2► L56 (N 38015�21" E 655.50� R4) -5N L32
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
(N 38 15 19 E 655.48 R2) �, M
MURRIETTA HOT L46 ( N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' R4) L57 (N 0° 33' 48" E 485.01' R4) o �r
SPRINGS ROAD \ (N 0° 33' 47" E 485.01' R2) "� °�
(N 0 20;58° E 265.41; R2) ° � �� � �,
L47 ( S 89 ° 26 26 E 126.20 R4) L58 (N 89 39 10 W 55.00 R4) N M
- - - ( N 89 ° 26' 26" W 126.19' R2 ► (N 890 39' 12" W 55. 00' R2 & R3) �
L59 (N 89 39 10 W 601.73 R4) ra
/V �0 ° \ L48 (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' 134) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.61' R2)
I A, o ( N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' 132 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 50' PM 14/93-94) �; �, �1
I NAME DELTA RAD I US ARC- "' � �� LI)
L49 (N 48°26'50" W 30.47' R4) ____ __ _ �� r a'� w LLI
�' w
( N 48025' S0" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600. 00' 653.17' R4) v �L23 s � t'� C)
L50 (N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' R4) (23° 23' 33" 1600. 00' 653. 24' R1 & R2) 21 �L22 U; ���
N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ► C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600. 00' 59.98' 134) �" r o (/)
- - - RORIPAUGH L51 N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500
\ ° 0' ' 1600. ' 5992 Rl & R2) m z
j /r Z o
C3 (35VALLEY I I ( .00' R41 0242„ 1600. 009. v Z
\ ROAD L52 (N 0033'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600. 00' 992.63' R1 & R2)
(N 0°34'04"E 1610.00' R1) �� J
O - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4)
�I IN 38015;18"E 82.30' R2)�,���
66 / L54 (N 0 33 48" E 150.19' R4) 6
1 (N 0°33'47"E 150.19' R2 8 R3) 1 L14� L15 o �p L43
'\ �� -■/ L1o L41
a \�� 0, �.r° L8 Lgt_ 0 \ �\°, 0 ®3 l��' a w
7 � , 6 0 �R L5 -
L53 \ L,
HE L
°36'16"E 37 34 2
73 R4)
5 �cl) /7' (N81°36� RZIE o °� ll �� -��� �0 ® 57
N53°53'32Q�R D 4 ``'�h�• / L --/� �� =TIRA � H oo ® o
o \ �� a
Q
\
o
�cc,
lel
z
z
A to
���\° ��
Imo-��•; o �o I �� i \ mo° �3734� \��\ � �] no
L� v
L7
Lf� C« �7
L�
LL,%
55' -
55'=
i
D
VG3Qcir I �]OO ® � 37306
Z
°
w N
N ~
rn
Mo
II FD 1 IP W/PP 'FRANK
& LAURA RICE 28029 /j \ \ cF Q Q r 97 0)�7 � no -
DN. 0.5, NO REFERENCE -
V) (422. 01' R4 H o / o I ACCEPTED AS POINT - V�
N89° 26' 26"W) L ON S'LY LINE OF
QN
L49-
L1 -
SEE
DETAIL ,, "
�0
29
N89 26026 W) L48 R2, R3 & R4 \�UG3LaC�7 L�]0.3�13�1=�z R3 & R4�1 ,�/ �GQC�� O.3�1341_�� \\
o _
L47 SOMMERS BEND -
FD 8%8 STONE MON. NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS (75.81' R4)
MK'D "P 17" ON STY 'T Q �37 314� e � 2 (75. 84' R2 & R3)
L59 J SIDE UP 1.2' PER TRACT MAP NO. 37341-13
L45 POINT ON S'LY LINE OF R3 & R4 (625.52' R4) (878.58' R4) 6
-m o 0 625.59R2 & R3)� (878.53' R2 & 133)
(5227.95' 134) (5227.88' R2 & 133)
ll _/ RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY (N89° 39' 10"W 5282.95' R4) (N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2 & R3)
Jpr11� 1 -FAR � 2 pr1f� , z1 _p, � 3 I r r /
pJ�ll� 1 ' PjV1 15r3� �J�ll� 1 �7� _PAJ , 12 _p]VIEi 1 ' � 3- )� �r1;� 1 1 � �r�R P2 _P- R � 3 / �r�r�
a
6, m
o m >_
oa
o =�
U z
z=)
ao
12 [ifm
D / Li
N m
LL' L7
~^ L�L�
M \ \
C
�
p
co Ll, 11
�_
N
c �
M �
N 1
Lj� u
u
T
M
N \
YJ
M
N\ �
Z �
' _ J
D_
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, TO BE
SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368, MB 468/89-98.
3. INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, TO BE
SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37341-12 MB / -
8 TRACT MAP 37341-14 MB / - AS NOTED.
8 TRACT MAP 37341-15 MB / - AS NOTED.
4. p INDICATES SET 1"IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805, FLUSH
5. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
6. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 14.745 ACRES GROSS.
7. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
8. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
9. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 22 LOTS.
10. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
11. RAD INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
12. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
13. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
14. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
15. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
16. R5 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37341-12 MB /
17. R6 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37341-14 MB /
------------
18. R7 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37341-15 MB /
19. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
20. C.C. 8 R's,RECORDED----------------AS INST.
NO.--------
-
21. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑x MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 81 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD o
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'. C)
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD.
AND RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34, J
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'. o
V)
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER o
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
BOOK T PAGE
TOTAL NUMBERED LOTS: 84
TOTAL LETTERED LOTS: 5
TOTAL NET AREA. 14.865 ACRES
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 19.237 ACRES
OWNER'S STATEMENT
WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY
PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO
SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS
SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: LOTS "A"
THROUGH "E", INCLUSIVE. FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER
WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES
AS SHOWN HEREON.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG
SOMMERS BEND AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD TO THE PUBLIC. THE
OWNERS OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 22, INCLUSIVE, LOT 82 AND LOT 84
ABUTTING THIS HIGHWAY AND DURING SUCH TIME WILL HAVE NO
RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERAL EASEMENT OF TRAVEL. ANY
CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OR WIDTH THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION
THEREOF SHALL TERMINATE THIS DEDICATION AS TO THE PART
VACATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 81,
INCLUSIVE, AND LOT 82 AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION IS
FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
WE HEREBY RETAIN LOTS "A" THROUGH "E" INDICATED AS "PRIVATE
STREET" FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR
SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE BLANKET EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE
PURPOSES OVER ALL OF LOT 82 AS SHOWN HEREON FOR PRIVATE
USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS,
ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS
SHOWN HEREON WITHIN LOT 82 FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE
BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT
OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN LOT 83 INDICATED AS "LANDSCAPE"
FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR
SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE PRIVATE SLOPE & LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE EASEMENT AS SHOWN HEREON WITHIN LOT 83 FOR
PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS,
ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT
FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
("DISTRICT''), A PUBLIC AGENCY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER
AND BY VIRTUE OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT LAW OF 1911,
ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF
WAY TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, ENLARGE, RECONSTRUCT, REMOVE AND
REPLACE, OPERATE, INSPECT, REPAIR, IMPROVE AND RELOCATE SEWER,
WATER, AND RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES, ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND DESIGNATED "SEWER, WATER, AND
RECYCLED WATER EASEMENT" HEREON, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT
OF ACCESS TO AND FROM SAID EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXERCISING THE RIGHTS GRANTED IN SAID EASEMENT. OWNER RETAINS
THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENT AREA PROVIDED THAT OWNER SHALL
NOT CONSTRUCT OR ERECT BUILDINGS, MASONRY WALLS, MASONRY
FENCES AND OTHER STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS, OR PLANT OR
GROW TREES OR SHRUBS, OR CHANGE THE SURFACE GRADE OR INSTALL
PRIVATELY -OWNED PIPELINES WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT
OF DISTRICT.
OWNER:
WOODS I DE 05S, LP,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Ye
NAME: CHRIS CHAMBERS
TITLE: VICE PRESIDENT, WDS GP, INC.
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
AS GENERAL PARTNER
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-14
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS
CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE
INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,
ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
CAP
BEFORE ME,
NOTARY PUBLIC PERSONALLY APPEARED
APRIL 2019
TAX BOND CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $
HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE
PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND
ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE
TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A
LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, AND SAID
BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
DATE:
A
CASH BOND
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE
THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN
INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED
THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT
BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S),
OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED,
EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE
AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
SIGNATURE
NAME:
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE
PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS:
COMMISSION EXPIRES:
COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, BY ITS CITY CLERK, RANDI JOHL, HEREBY
APPROVES THE TRACT MAP AND ACCEPTS THE OFFER
OF DEDICATION OF LOTS "A" THROUGH "E". MADE HEREON
FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF
INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY AND SERVICE VEHICLES.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF ABUTTERS
RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG SOMMERS BEND AS DEDICATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE 3' PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT AS DEDICATED.
DATED:
2020
BY:
RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK, CITY OF TEMECULA
SOILS REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66490 OF THE
STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, A PRELIMINARY SOILS
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF CA. PROJECT NO. 10967.108
ON JUNE 25, 2018, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECLULA.
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
y20_e
BY: DEPUTY
TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS
OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE
PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY,
MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXES, OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES NOW A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED
TO BE $
DATE-
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
20.
SHEET 1 OF 8 SHEETS
RECORDER'S STATEMENT
FILED THIS DAY OF , 20—
AT .M IN BOOK OF MAPS, AT PAGES
AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA.
NO.
FEE:
PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK -RECORDER
DEPUTY
SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS
BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE
AT THE REQUEST OF WOODSIDE 05S, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP IN JANUARY 2018. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL
MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS
INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP AND THAT THE
MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO
BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS
TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. THIS SURVEY IS
TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN.
DATE:
W I LL I AM ROHAL, L. S. 8805
DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE
SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR
OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED:
AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
OF CALIFORNIA FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
0. R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'S
ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE EASEMENT DEDICATED ON THIS MAP TO THE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT IS HEREBY ACCEPTED AND THE
DISTRICT CONSENTS TO THE RECORDATION THEREOF BY ITS DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
DATE:
SHEILA ZELAYA, BOARD SECRETARY OF THE EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THEREOF
i0 LAND
Roy Fs
\F CA1-�F���\/
I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF EIGHT (8)
SHEETS HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND FOUND TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED
ON THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 37341 AS FILED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ON JUNE 20, 2018, THE EXPIRATION DATE BEING JUNE 20, 2021.
THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY
REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, AND I AM
SATISFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
DATED:
KRIS R. WINCHAK
EXP. 3-31-20
(AS DELEGATED)
CITY OF TEMECULA
2020
L.S. 6240
FOR PATRICK A. THOMAS,
CITY ENGINEER
�\ No. L.S. 6240
SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SBM
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
132)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
R4)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
Lll
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30°10'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41°58'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD
�7 M
20
e
L45��
L 5 9
�(N89* 39' 10" W
5282.95' R4)-A-
(N89° 39' 12"W
co 5282.87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
N.T.S.
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO, 37341-14
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
APRIL 2019
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR
BOUNDARY MAP,
BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR
SHEET INDEX MAP.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' 134) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' R2)
I IN 89°39'12" W 319 80' R2► L56 (N 38015�21" E 655.50� R4) -5N L32
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
(N 38 15 19 E 655.48 R2)
MURRIETTA II-IOT I L46 (N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' 134) L57 (N 0° 33' 48" E 485.01134) o --R\r
A cz
SPRINGS ROAD J (N 0 ° 20' 58" E 265.41 ' R2 ) (N 00 33' 47" E 485.01 � R2) � "� N
L47 (S 89026'26" E 126.20' R4) L58 (N 89°39�10 W 55.00� R4) N M
- - - - (N 89 ° 26' 26" W 126.19' R2 ► (N 89° 39' 12" W 55. 00� R2 & R3) � � � � ti
L59 (N 89 39 10 W 601.73 R4) ra \ s T-
L48 (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 61' R2) `P L2 � \� r-
= `�� ;�
I Y o� o ( N 0°33' 34" E 76.01 ' R2 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.50' PM 14/93-94) s �, �1
I NAME DELTA RAD I US ARC- (n �� ` L�
L49 (N 48°26'S0" W 30.47' R4) ��' r a'� w
�' w
6 ( N 48025' 50" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600. 00' 653.17' R4) 1-4 s t'� C)
L50 ( N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' R4) (23° 23' 33" 1600. 00' 653. 24' R1 & R2) 21 �L22 U;
N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ► C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600. 00' 59. 98' 134) �" r r o (i
- - - RORIPAUGH C3 (35° �2' 42' 1600. 00' 992.60 R4) & R2) j /r � = o z
\ VALLEY I I L51 ( N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500.00' R41 ° „ v z
ROAD L52 (N 0033'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600. 00' 992.63' R1 & R2) �°� �� V a�
(N 0034'04"E 1610.00' R1)
0 - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4) '� (N 38015'18"E 82.30' R2) IR2 o
6%, ° 66. l / L54 (N 0°33'48" E 150.19' R4) ,\6 r LIN
AIIL61�C":
Rpgp�4
N53° 53' 32"W R.
0�
\�
- T
I
L7 C« �7
L�
LL,%
55' -
55'=
�� �'j�� 12��0� ��6• IN 0033'47"E 150.19' R2 8 133) �12 L13 �L14� L1i o �a L43
oo L8 L9 L10 L41
�� ��/Q�� �]0 ® 377 �� a
v0 �' 3734�_3 HE Zoo/go-go
L L53 `
P�/�� �2 4G3LaC�� 100 ® HE 47 V 400 -147 5
C/�N81°36'16E3734�-2
.131
5 g /�h ��; � tN81 36 465 RZ)E �
I` �� �.� I f o a �1 � D ?' y I z
x Ho
,so
406/80-08
% o O e /
lel
24
o
V / \ o
1
UG3Q0u I H0®ca
110,
OWQCT, N0® 3�3� o°
_ �wN
N �r-
MO "VIJ ° ° cJ c�J °
Z Q Q H 0 ® 1I377 3o a FD 1" IP W/PP "FRANK
J & LAURA RCE 28029
QN
L49
LQ /
L_ CL_2 ICI
SEEI
DETAIL "A "
29
TRACT MAP NO. 37341-14
T7 DN. 0.5, NO REFERENCE
(422. 01 �R4 No Lzcs o 0- 0 o ACCEPTED AS POINT p
N89 26 26 W) ON SLY LINE OF / [t�V] [3 too/go-go
(422.00' R2 L48 R3 & R4
N89° 26' 26"W) I S / \
F-- L51
L47 � _ SOMMERS BEND= - -1 FD 1" IP OPEN DN. 0.5 _ - - - (75.81 R4)
FD 8'X8 STONE MON. - -- NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS �
L59 MKT "P17"ON S'LY POINT ON STY LINE OF R3 & R4 (75.84' R2 & R3)
SIDE UP 1.2 PER (625.52' R41 (878.58' R4) 66
R2, R3 & R4 o N o S 625.59R2 & R3 - y
"� ----- _-� (878.53 R2 & R3) -
1 _ RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY _T (5227.95' R4) (5227.88' R2 & R3)
ll / l _ (N89° 39' 10"W 5282.95' R4) (N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2 & R3) /
�r1f� 1 1 PAR 1 � P"1R � �1 t r�f� � � I \ l � l r' /
PJVJ� 1 4 PJ\J1� 15r3,/ P1�Jl= 12 J/ �r1;�, 12 P1�J1J 1' ) � )� �r1;� 1 1 �r�;�,PIM _JI � / �r1f�
SHEET 2 OF 8 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
4. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
5. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 19.237 ACRES GROSS.
6. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
7. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
8. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 84 LOTS.
9. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
10. RAID INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
11. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
12. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
13. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
14. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
15. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED ---------------- AS INST.
NO --------------
17. // // / INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑X MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 & R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 & R4, DN. 0.1'.
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. AND
RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34,
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
SCALE: 1" = 400'
400 0 400 800
3
55.00'
N
N
i
cscr_
W
aN
ON
x 00
W
� aC=
w O
M
V/ 00 � M
M
JLLI
o
� Z
C,
W
H
Im L
c- 0
E= w
00
o cr
0
M
O M
cD O
O
z
w
00
M
M
IZ
55.00'
N
Of
o /-
AULD RD A.
0
A
MURRIETq HOT
SPRINGS RD SITE
QoJ
E.9
R�
�ZCO�ps
CANTRELL
RD m rn
15
LA SERENA o
WAY
v
MARGARITA �0
RD
Of
9
MEADOWS
PKWY
-00 28' 03.697"
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO, 37341-14
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY MAP
APRIL 2019
TABLE DATA
CONVERGENCE ANGLE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTE
AT THE NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS SHEET AFFECTING I NAME
CORNER OF SECTION 21 THIS MAP IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE OF I L1
- -I
VICINITY MAP
„_ ,
SCALE. 1 - 100
THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF
BOOK T , PAGE 401 . THIS
TEMECULA, IN
AFFECTS ALL
E.C.S. I
LOTS.
L2
L3
N,T,S,
I
L4
-
- 100
0 160
200
I
L5
L6
'TRA U
MO.
37 30 a
L8
\ \
L9
L 10
C-)j
H D
408 0 0 0 °0 o
Lll
L12
20
I
2�
L13
�I
\
�I
---_-_--
NAME
ZI
--------------
C1
C5
p
C 2
C3
J
�
O
'rIRAcu m(a ®
I37 30 a
C5
3
(N 9
l
7
26'' RgJ
03„*
' ��
�� ,�
o d o 0 0 0° o g
G�] C3 C� �3 0 B B
C
C8
_ c' v�
C9
Cg
0
C 10
�o ,\
Sv
C 11
C 12
C9
C 13
(N86° 23' 30" W 298.26' R4 1
_
C14
L6 1 i I L7
TRACT MAP NO. 37341-14
L8 L - m L 10
w
o Cc
o 00
00
-
j
zio
N
M
zc\1
•w
o c
O C=
0 0
z rn
DIRECTION
(N 75015'56" W
(N 00033'34" E
(N 89026'02" W
(N 00033'58" E
(N 63032'53" W
(N 76056'06" W
(N 86023'30" W
(N 86018'37" E
(N 86023'30" W
(N 76055'53" W
(N 0033'34" E
(N 0021'36" E
(N 0021'34" E
(N 0033'48" E
(N 0033'47" E
DELTA
(10°21'55"
(29°44'28"
(14°10'26"
(93°07'17"
(21°52'42"
( 4°06'27"
(46°07'57"
(29°07'48"
( 5°50'29"
(41°02'11"
(31°34'47"
(31°15'22"
(38°33'15"
(14°10'30"
RADIUS
--LENGTH-
50.01134)
1.01' 134)
83.14' 134)
39.44' 134)
75.36' 134)
72.48' 134)
38.83' 134)
93.93' 134)
93.33' 134)
46.49' 134)
76.01' 134)
2636.10' 134)
2636.07' R2 & 133)
150.19' 134)
150.19' R2 & 133)
787.00'
713.00'
787.00'
10.00,
384.50'
615.50'
50.00'
35.00'
615.50'
50.00'
35.00'
35.00'
50.00'
750.00'
142.38' R4
370.10' R4
194.69' R4
16.25' R4
146.82' R4
44.12' R4
40.26' R4
17.79' R4
62.75' R4
35.81' R4
19.29' R4
19.09' R4
33.64' R4
185.55' R4
SHEET 3 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 , AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 28° 5323" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354.
LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES EXISTING LOT LINE
INDICATES
FOUND AS NOTED.
■
INDICATES
1" IRON PIPE TAGGED
LS 8805,
FLUSH TO BE SET PER
TRACT MAP
37368, MB 468/89-98.
0
INDICATES
SET 1" IRON PIPE
TAGGED LS
8805, FLUSH.
Ak
INDICATES
CONTINUOUS OPERATING
REFERENCE
STATIONS
(CORS, AS
NOTED).
u lq A°, C,T H 0 ® 37308 CORS STATION "BILL"
N 2154995.0380
HE 4 0 0 0 0 0 e 0 o E 6313564.1750
N88° 29' 38" E '%"
it
° 00OOIw 5295.87' (GRID) FM 0.° 2��
9 N88 29 38E �6 �5 �3/ 0.'
5296.39"
(N88 29 37 E
20 '5296.39' w�
R2&R3) ui ,
o/ o
DETAIL 'A' (n�Loa)
O n, �
c> CO , N
N00° 3338" E RpD o
' Z/ Z N
A � �o
� O
TO
o L11MERS BEND Z C3'IN/00
(N00°59'25"E N2.00' R4) N89°26'12"W
55. 00, ro
BUTTERFIELD L13
STAGE ROAD
2
(N89° 26' 26"W 422.01' R4) C3 L 1 , ; lN2g.20� R 00 _
(N89 26 26 W 422.00 R2) I ' \
(N89° 26' 26"W' 500.00' R4) - �� �� - 37. 00'-- r2° 59 R=750.00' L=431.84 R4)
C14 - C2
001
Ll
\ 8Rql S M4=Z9°44'2TR=750.00'1
00 C= 00 SEE DETAIL A'
ow r13L cr H0° 20 �911-�ME�
----
00
M �
4- Z FIRE EXISTING
U IRA 0 u Ha. 37 30 o HIE zoo/so - 90 0
/ L2 00
4
c
CORS STATION "PMOB" \ \
N 2074153126Q
E 6375547:4700
0 `o 0 Z
m
° �332w g3
BASIS OF
BEARINGS DETAIL
N.T.S.
l
RS STATION "P477"
2127663.6770
6298482.8020
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-14
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
SHEET INDEX MAP
I
I
I
I
\ I
\\ I
\ I
\UnAcr MAPI
140 @ / @ a =9
sBAND _----
ER
rHAC7 HO ® 37 38
CtV]M 406/ 0-0 a
APRIL 2019
'r[RAC7
1 O ® 37 190
2
@ a / a 0 e0
16
SHEET 4 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 , AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 28° 53'23" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354.
LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES EXISTING EASEMENT LINE
INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS
OINDICATES SHEET NO.
EASEMENT NOTES
1 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND
INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF GENERAL
TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED
DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
O.R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
2 3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED HEREON.
3 AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER, WATER AND RECYCLED
WATER PURPOSES WITHIN LOT 82.
4 PRIVATE 10' WIDE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
WITHIN LOT 82
5 PRIVATE SLOPE & LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT
WITHIN LOT 83 (WIDTH VARIES)
6 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS
FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DEDICATED HEREON.
7 AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER AND WATER PURPOSES
WITHIN LOTS "A" THROUGH "E".
SCALE: 1" = 100'
100 6 100 200
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO,, 37341-14
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
SHEET 5 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY
CONTROL SHEET, SURVEYOR'S NOTES
AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY
MAP, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX
MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES.
LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE
NAME DIRECTION LENGTH NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
-----------------------------
-------------------------------
L1 (N 86023'30" W 298.26' 134) C1 (10021'55" 787.00' 142.38' 134)
L2 (N 86023'30" W 38.83' R4) C2 (32059'24" 750.00' 431.84' R4)
L3 (N 76055'53" W 46.49' R4) C3 13014'54" 750.00' 173.42'
L4 N 38012'05" E 21.08' C4 (41002'11" 50.00' 35.81' R4)
L5 N 48004'47" W 35.34' C5 (31034'47" 35.00' 19.29' R4)
L6 N 51003'07" E 35.34' C6 (31015'22" 35.00' 19.09' R4)
L7 N 35046'07" W 21.08' C7 (38033'15" 50.00' 33.64' R4)
L8 N 01029'10" E RAID 79.59' C8 3000'00" 495.00' 25.92'
L9 N 51005'53" E 23.66' C9 2048'45" 500.00' 24.54'
L10 N 07000'00" E 51.35' C10 4044'19" 750.00' 62.03'
L11 N 10022'01" W 41.04' C11 4044'19" 713.00' 58.97'
L12 N 87038'23" W 41.04' C12 16013'23" 300.00' 84.94'
L13 N 40059'48" E 30.19' C13 13031'05" 300.00' 70.78'
SCALE: 1 50' L14 N 38000' 00" W 24.04' C14 17022' 01 " 102.00' 30.92'
L15 N 74059'36" E 17.25' C15 8023'35" 328.00' 48.05'
009 L16 N 83009'58" W 89.47' C16 1011'45" 523.00' 10.92'
50 0 50 100 L17 N 88047'01" W 89.37' C17 2048'45" 472.00' 23.17'
L18 N 01029'10" E 17.16' C18 2048'45" 528.00' 25.92'
L19 N 01029'10" E 17.31' C19 3000'00" 467.00' 24.45'
C20 31055'57" 68.00' 37.90'
C21 33042'12" 68.00' 40.00'
U R A CCU H 0® 3 7 3 0 o C22 37005'29" 68.00' 44.02'
C23 0012'21" 787.00' 2.83'
C24 13029'27" 102.00' 24.02'
H o C25 3052'34" 102.00' 6.90'
C26 2014'55" 713.00' 27.98'
C27 0016'17" 528.00' 2.50'
C28 2032'28" 528.00' 23.42'
C29 7049'47" 300.00' 41.00'
C30 1048'15" 495.00' 15.59'
a v vo
v �
v
L1 �` (N76°56'06„W
72' 48Rq) L2
(N86° 18' 37" E (N86023' 30" W
93.93' R4) 93.33' R4)
` L3
432.00, ° bob �'� "LANDSCAPE/SLOPE" \�N34° 51'52"E RAD PRC
N85° 48'45"W N77 12'l Q� SEE SHEET 8
53.00' 55.65 1'38�,w
N85° 48' 45"W 108.43' ' g1�lE N88° 11' 15"W 65.61' °°
0 54. 00, N83° 35' 55" W N80° 2Q N86° 00' 00" W
co 00 0 0 54.43' 62.45' 52•19' 42.84' S3.19' N68°� .'
0
I
o S9 76'
73
74 w 75 w '_'' o ,r; ,�`�% ,N o co
LO o ni
76 o M 77 w �' N a'
78
z o o N o 0 79 Lu ,l w
o r o O o 80 0 81 0
z 2 o O o o O o
O N
-53.00, z z '� O o C 0
o ti o 00 0
--55.00'- _54.00' Z o ti
o N850 48' 4511 600, 96'-51.46'_ C28_ _34• z O o 0
60' z z z W --�- �, 7 PRIVATE STREET 096' LOT "p" I C18 o-50.00'"W -_ C�
6 N85° 48' 45"W - -55• 07 _ ° N83
o S - �_�_ - N 1 C9 N 00' 00 139.67' O 35.00 - _56.35' -
q °° EDGE w/4Y N83° 00, 00 O i C 19 i o N86 00' 00" W 91. 35'
N - 139. �1 f0 0
N85°48'45"W o01 c0 67 N o
OI 45.00 , C8 'N 91.35' N
�O-51.00'- 600.96 � f I o ,
- -51. 00' - - - "' C17 ' oo 60067 W 1 28
55. 00' N83 ' 00•. N o ti C30 0' o N86° 00' 00" W 96 53 '
53.00'- - I I
o ��-48 L 16
0 2 � M �% N
Lu o Ln o � 91 -_- /-N86°00'00"W 96.35'- w o0
LV g � o 0o i � rn I 28.00' 28.00' �`' W)
_ 51 50 w 49 _`" 48 O 47 0 01 0
W _ LO 46 �'
Co a, I� 1 0 [� 0
Lu o ti 50.0 " ti `r ZI ti z
W Z Z z z Z z 15° OQ2q ,,, 28.00' N82° o0
Q5 36.29' 65. ooW W 1.96' 59 36 W 127.36' ` Q o
56.1 5g, 36��E N83° 00' 00 20
51.00, 51.00' ��W 101.49' o O
N85°35'10"W ° , q ti O J
' J' , o Z ti N
N85 35 10" W 33 5g, 36�� E N1 54, 00 �
47.23' `�' o 0 0 7 2 N o0
N85° 35' 10" W NA 4* 00� o z a L
56.20' N 45 v �I � a
? o0 o I o a w N83° 00' 00" W 111.18' -`" o�
0 C o N 43 �, o I v� W co N rn
00 41 42 oo q1' �I �,
w a Q 62• Q¢ N U 3
CO
z�
C�l
o �5Q • Q q1' ?;
21a' 6 7 Q avoi o
,53.QQ' C\i/5 N1q° 51E S��EEl 2 1p3.4Q Cp 6= Q'��•ti� N68°?6�05 13 84,
Z =17° 00 31 paN I� 5g� 36 E - - /c, W RAC
19' \ w`Ay \ o C14 L12 A=1027 j 0�• 94�
=29° 14'28" R=272.00' L=141�2� \� rn ,,�^ `w`'`N -C24- 32.29'- -C22 \,I,, w o;��
--� 29044 28" R=300. 00 L-155 o y AC 52.14 1Q �\
� 13 C12
N 9' 36„ E 1 q6 • \ 2 xz''- 4 oo a i
o C29 C29 T� \ o Nl q° 5 i 53 • QQ� c z1 2 `�s�,� o o
O p 0 O
N o s oo rn
N1 a' L17 I� C15 i52•QQ 2 ?� �'I o �0 5 oa \�qo ��w RAD z� /
00
52 _
46 E RA �� 32.00' Q _32.00' Ln o 6 � N11 ° 23"
�, LLJ Q a,� `-`' I°e `�` zo 1'J 7 0' '-� c 4l' 12" j L=87.54
'r' �" '� W � � , I pO `Jr- 1 v+ 8 2� =3° 01,
O -j � ¢ w�� *I I� IW 9 1�=52• 1
0 0 >_ oC v';I I 10
S06° 13' 29"W RA Z °° Q Z rl Z rn I III I(o I v \yo Q3, 53 • QQ, 1-0
01
�-
_-0Imp=q° 11' 30" C26 25' ° 5g, 36„E 12g• o\
32. 00' Q32. 00, \�s ( L=5° 1815111 I L=52,16
L=66.13 �j\ g•,
C11
D --
o' 1d=29° 44' _ L=370.10' R4) o\\ -.-I-
o l 28 M J R 713. 00 I w
74 cli o o MERS
_ OM
M�� C1 o C10 'I - , 891 o\\ s /
C3 6 29' 34" L 2 R4) `\
(4=29°44'28" R=750.00' L=389.31' y
'TG3ac'r H(3 ® 37 30 a HIE 40 8 0 9 0 og
\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_SD_M\17883CM_Roripcugh\Survey\Tract_37341-14\17883AM-14fm05_McpSht.dgn PLOT DATE: 07-FEB-2020 JN 16464
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO,, 37341-14
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
SHEET 6 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY
CONTROL SHEET, SURVEYOR'S NOTES
AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY
MAP, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX
MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES.
LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE
NAME DIRECTION LENGTH NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
---- ---------------- ---------
Ll (N 75015'56" W 50.01' R4) C1 14010'26" 787.00' 194.69'
L2 (N 00033'34" E 1.01, R4) C2 8030'35" 713.00' 105.90'
SCALE:1" = 50' L3 (N 00059'25" E 2.00' R4) C3 16029'34" 750.00' 215.89'
L4 (N 63032'53" W 75.36' R4) C4 (46007'57" 50.00' 40.26' R4)
5� 50 ��� L5 N 88032'00" W 42.55' C5 (29007'48" 35.00' 17.79' R4)
L6 N 51003'07" E 35.34' C6 ( 5°50'29" 615.50' 62.75' 134)
L7 N 35046'07" W 21.08' C7 7049'47" 300.00' 41.00'
L8 N 01029'10" E RAID 79.59' C8 5041'18" 328.00' 32.56'
L9 N 82020'10" W 18.86, C9 13031'05" 300.00' 70.78'
L10 N 88047'01" W 89.37' C10 29044'28" 272.00' 141.19'
L11 N 01029'10" E 17.16' C11 29044'28" 300.00' 155.72'
C12 3018'30" 713.00' 41.17'
C13 1003'08" 787.00' 14.45'
C14 0054'39" 912.00' 14.50'
C15 3053'25" 787.00' 53.43'
C16 3057'11" 787.00' 54.30'
Q Q C'T H (3. IST ISS o C17 3057' 07" 787.00' 54. 28'
C18 1019'35" 787.00' 18.22'
C19 0044'04" 912.00' 11.69'
Hv o °4 0 o 1 8 g o g S C20 0024' 52" 968.00' 7. 00'
v C21 3 08'13" 968.00' 53.00'
C22 0018'19" 968.00' 5.16'
9 C23 4044'19" 713.00' 58.97'
�9 C24 4044'19" 750.00' 62.03'
C25 12043'57" 272.00' 60.44'
C6 �-
(N86°23'30"W 298.26' R4)
"LANDSCAPE/SLOPE"
SEE SHEET 8
53. 10, 53. 00' N85° 48' 45"W
55.00' 432.00'
54.00' 54.00'
0 55.00' 53.00,
co� o 0 0 53.00'
o in o
6 o �11� `� o
66 w 67 o o o
w
P 68 69 w 70 00
O
71 w
q 9p, o � 72 77
z o
Z ov- v
Z Z Lo
Z O
- 53.10, - z 2 0
-53.00' z o
a-55.00'_ --54.00' z
co N85° 48' 45"W-54.00' - 55. 00'_
--53.00' -
PRIVATE STREET600.96 - -
ooI 6 7-��5°48'45"W LOT "p"
� - �600.96'
-- " SEDGE WAY - --�'
-55.00'--51.00- N85° 48' 45"W
- 51.Op'- - - - 600.96'
ao 55.00,-53.00, _
-53.00'--55.001-
" Q- MCD
- -
e- M 2 ro
O m
Lij N O 1�
00
58 w 57 w N � o
56 "
55
K, _ u') w 54 W o
CIJ_ 53 �., 52 w
o � _
O Z Z v
CD
Z
L5 z Z
~ 51. 09 Z o
W 39. 25' L9 N82° 20 10 51. 09, z
_ <I - ¢ 58. 01 ' W N8 58 00' 10"W 35. 02' 23. 20
U) w 7, N79° 42, 29.94 53.00' O
" oo' Z
W Nj �,,,, ,c 0 58- 21' W N85° 35' 10"W N85° 35' 1011 55.
W �� 'n� No 34 0 ;� �„ 54.55' 53.87' W N85°35'10"W W
Vi �' �.; 35 rn � ,11 0 4 7. 23'
oil Z o 36 o M W
Z \ Lo
o M 37 0 -
O co (o a V)
C20 z o ° 38 ;o , - Q
- - - _C21_ - z 2 z �' N 39 0 ;� w ;� W
-C2� _ Lo 40 0 14t W
o I d=13° 16' 04" 00,
0 C21 = C,`l' � � o �
o NI PRIVAT968. L=224, ,C2�
(is0 0 6 d=13° 16'04= S oREET 16M \0 48.0p, �� o
CD
7 HYq 40. L-217, 67,CDs o 53
- - " c�NrH 1�� - N; N75 15'S6'�w 113
6=13° ,� vV
16' 04 Y ° • 91
C1 �" S3� 42��- a-3 =912. 00 L=211. 19' o, N75 15,56 W o C25 - - - -
o L=62.00' L=62300?�� �d-3°49 / �13. 91, co
l C10
wl o L=61.0p6 C14 3g.gN75°15,56„w8Lop C9 C11 �-
� ll �I 13
�o N �i - w o M \ 53. 1.,- 91 ' ti/ w l C7
�� co orn 16 w1 Ki v� 15 �I o' �" Q' a 40 C8 "i00
w l WI N N 14 W% o L 10 0� DETAIL 'A'
z o 'oi O to a' �' `fl oM Mi 2 1 32.00' ¢ d H
SEE z �nl z tl-/ o/ �v� 13 o co w N.T.S.
DETAIL 'A' \ zl o,� o' `_`'� w
C18\ C17 \ \
z v d / -16
`" �' Q Nam'
I z "'I �I
Q
17 I ° �38°E
L2 N00 33 _-
C16 \
o 11 o
��
w
-- - RAD
0 C1 C15
C z ;`'/' v 2r 1 z
13 - 38. v "i
z
Q
>
(N00° 33' 34" E C1 4
co
1 6' z/= -� J
Q
CL
76.01' R4) SOMMERS BEND
M`- (d=14° 10'30" 00
o' R=750.
° `fll
o% L1 -� C12 d=5 12'06" z'
32.00'
_ _ L3
o
Z o - R4J �'� l o /C) C2 C23 J�
SOMMERS �!� �� !' ' (d=29°44'28" o _
M o/ I R=713.00
o "' -L=370.10' R4) �---
- o / ro
SEE - �' d=13°14'54" - �i C24 _ _
R= 750. DETAIL A 1d=29° 00 L=173.42' ° '
44 28 A=16 29 34 L=215.89
R=750.00' L=389.31' R4)
- - - - - - - - - - -
�4
LTV O • 37
NB 46 O/ O 0 e0 O
\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_SD_M\17883CM_Ror1paugh\Survey\Tract_37341-14\17883AM-14fm06_MapSht.dgn PLOT DATE: 10-FEB-2020 JN 16464
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO,, 37341-14
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
SCALE: 1" = 50'
50 0 50 100
4
NO3°41'15"E RAD PCC
I
I
C3
C4
14.39' L13
0
L3 N I I �lk
02�31„
T SF£ pFT 113. 98,
I t
I
I
0
of I
M
N
10' 82
"BASIN"
�I00
N �N BLANKET EASEMENT
co/ FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES
N OVER ALL OF LOT 82
2.061 ACRES
Iz
umAC'T IN] 0 ® 117 so
IJVIJ o 4 0 8 0 o 0 o 9J o
N64.
031,
,,0 53, R
9j
NS8ol
°
' QS-
19
CS
S �
"LANDSCAPE/
SLOPE"
SEE SHEET 8
N73°52,
60. O6 8"W
Z�
1s
N61l'°1
o zr 6q 6ff*
Lo 00
a
o
L12 - -
I64 -< Lo
I I m w _o
o I o N 65 w
z
0 3 4 2 0 10
•-I _ _ z
_ C>
0 1.23' NLl1.23' 10� 72.64' • 90� z
C14. 99�(�0" A-C25 - _C26_
M N90° 00' 00"W 132.57' �`� N -C27 -
'` C18
N90° 00' 00"W 113.13' �'� D��'�4' N90° 00' 00"W �I 182. 55' "' ` LOT "D 1 o'
101.23' 109.91' C10 ONI
6
7
Q o N63°50'40"W RAD,/' 55.00' PRIVATE STREET o SEDGE "'ol -
O--------- I- 28.00' WAY
o 28 I o -'- N90° 00' 00" W 127.55' N C17 N
o 4. 95' O `�" �� 0 Q. 00 51. 00' 36. 55' C30- - C29 - -C28- _ L11 -�
�• ,o
��/� w N90° 00' 00" W 99.38' o Q 6, 28.00 \a�0� 2 0 o
w V rn �o
ap 6� da) \ M I�
O `- N O ti
`r 0 rn 00 o 27 i9 o o o _�
J r � 1
M W O \ U M w w � QY
Z Z N90° 00' 00" W 114.86' '�:' p N 63 0 62 0 61 60 0 59 Lo 68
v LV N84026' 13"E RAD 28.00 28.00' °° O O oo
0=50 33' 47" L=9. 90' 56. 00' o o r `V
o z z o 0 0
Z Z Z
Lo 26 J 6 7 N88032' 00"W 320. 42'
�, w 67.02i 51.02' 55.26' 52.15' 52.42' 42.55'
a N90° 00' 00"W 115. 88' ,�, 0 68. 67' 53. 00' 53. 00' 53. 00' O
NO28.00 0 53.50' 39.25' Z
"' 5.71 ' N O o
o i- w o0 o r= w w w w � I ~
00 0 `� 25 W o z o 0 0 0 0 o w' w L u
rn d u)� o z 29 O 00 30 O o0 31 00 32 0 o 33 �, I M W
N nj N
M U N90° 00' 00"W 108. 52' `�' w N 28.00' z z o o Lol:L
� z z
Z 13. 04' U Q o 'yQ �`�] 2 (i z W
= r , �Lu
a � oo,\- 40. 00 _ 53. 00'- -53. 00'_ (�
M 24 N "' PRIVATE N88032' 00"W 244.83'
00 � Z N' �, I- 28.00' STREET ° 4��
C16
36� 53.61' o N88 32 00 W 298.44' locoC\i - q
APO 1�5° 102.26' 6 - �- o _ C9
�0°32�36� ��,� ;� 7 HYACINTH WAY LOT "B" `��I
N z C12 N88°32'00"W 196 1 NI
L6
C2
C21-
��
M O
I
Lo 23 w o
N
z
IO
,�o•
,�c0 O
IO
O
22 W
I� 21
y N89° 26' 26"W h4' O
6
I� 00
Iy N
p
o
o
�
z
0
12.64'
109.20' 5 .06'
(N89° 26' 26"W 422.01' R4) (N89° 26' 26"W 422.00' R2)
(N89° 26' 26"W 500.00' R4)
SOMMERS BEND
�2
'TRAC 'T H0 ® 20 35 3=2
No 342/ 713- 8 a
i
0-47.18'
Ln
-53.00'-
.8
-53.00-
-43.00'
`9
IO
L
O
2
N
'`
M
'
M
I�
Iw 20
0
19
0
ui
18 0
17
o
O
,
IZE
co
N
00
N
00
N
SEE
0
z
0
z
o
z
DETAIL
,A,
53.18'
S3.01'
53.01'
35.0 C6
CI I -�--
C7 - -
Q
w
� � N
cfl o �
M u JV
N
z
N01°53'13"E RAD
w o 0
0
c v ao ti
M tY M M C 2
o YYY
rn o
-M O
ti
o
M
SEE DETAIL 'A'
IJ �Y
71R A C 7 IN100 ® 37 36
No 468/80=08
SHEET 7 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY
CONTROL SHEET, SURVEYOR'S NOTES
AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY
MAP, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX
MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES.
CURVE TABLE
NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
Cl
(14010'26"
787.00'
194.69'
R4)
C2
(14010'30"
750.00'
185.55'
134)
C3
(93007'17"
10.00,
16.25'
134)
C4
(21052'42"
384.50'
146.82'
134)
C5
( 4006'27"
615.50'
44.12'
134)
C6
1019'35"
787.00'
18.22'
C7
0044'04"
912.00'
11.69'
C8
0024'52"
968.00'
7.00'
C9
13016'04"
940.00'
217.67'
C10
4011'15"
1800.00'
131.55'
C11
13016'04"
912.00'
211.19'
C12
11048'41"
102.00'
21.03'
C13
112009'22"
68.00'
133.11'
C14
17022'01"
102.00'
30.92'
C15
124044'02"
68.00'
148.04'
C16
13016'04"
968.00'
224.16'
C17
4011'15"
1772.00'
129.51'
C18
4011'15"
1828.00'
133.60'
C19
3022'13"
102.00'
6.00'
C20
8026'28"
102.00'
15.03'
C21
40026'39"
68.00'
48.00'
C22
31016'05"
68.00'
37.11'
C23
11048'15"
102.00'
21.01'
C24
43031'21"
68.00'
51.65'
C25
1005'49"
1828.00'
35.00'
C26
1041'33"
1828.00'
54.00'
C27
1023'53"
1828.00'
44.60'
C28
1043'55"
1772.00'
53.56'
C29
1048'27"
1772.00'
55.90'
C30
0038'58"
1772.00'
20.04'
C31
87042'53"
12.00'
18.37'
C32
76048'26"
20.00'
26.81'
C33
76048'26"
30.00'
40.22'
C34
87042'53"
2.00'
3.06'
C35
87006'12"
10.00,
15.20'
C36
26022'55"
68.00'
31.31'
LINE TABLE
NAME DIRECTION LENGTH
L1
(N
00°59'25"
E
2.00'
R4)
L2
(N
00°33'34"
E
1.01'
R4)
L3
(N
89°26'02"
W
83.14'
R4)
L4
(N
00°33'58"
E
39.44'
R4)
L5
(N
63°32'53"
W
75.36'
R4)
L6
N
79039'19"
E
41.04'
L7
N
11048'41"
E
41.04'
L8
N
00000'00"
E
49.83'
L9
N
17022'01"
W
41.04'
L10
N
72037'59"
W
41.04'
L11
N
85048'45"
W
600.96'
L12
N
85048'45"
W
432.00'
L13
N
89026'12"
W
30.50'
L14
N
02024'29"
W
49.09'
L15
N
85018'24"
E
23.53'
L16
N
02024'29"
W
39.60'
DETAIL U
N.T.S.
NO2" 19' 50" W RAD
N89" 26' 02"W RAD G
IN
A
�ILo
L- L13
J � �
N IN to
a
L15
L15
10'
DETAIL 'A'
N.T.S.
17 16
I L2 N00° 33' 38" E
---- RAD
(N00° 33' 34" E C1
76.01' R4) SOMMERS BEND
- - L1
0
\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C-SD-M\17883CM-Roripcugh\Survey\Tract-37341-14\17883AM-14fm07-McpSht.dgn PLOT DATE: 10-FEB-2020 JN 16464
0
Q
O
Lu
Fw
I
W
Lu
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO, 37341-14
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
LINE TABLE
NAME DIRECTION LENGTH
SCALE:"= 6�' L1
N
68017'10"
W
59.16'
L2
N
86000'00"
W
65.61'
L3
N
88011'15"
W
42.84'
60 O 60 �20 L4
N
80020'41"
E
52.19'
L5
N
83035'55"
W
62.45'
L6
N
89026'12"
W
30.50'
L7
IN
00033'58"
E
39.44'
R4)
L8
IN
63032'53"
W
75.36'
R4)
L9
IN
86°23'30"
W
38.83'
R4)
L10
IN
76055'53"
W
46.49'
R4)
C1
14.37' '
25.07' J
I I
I I
I
10,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
U�
CL \
Q
�I \
wl \ \
ini \
r-
C2
N68°
02'3� � W
'Z6 113 98,
02
"BASIN"
'1146,,°26.03„
*
?0S3-R
9j
NS8°
0/
�S-
SEE SHEET NO. 7
64
67
APRIL 2019
CURVE
TABLE
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
----
Cl
-----------
(93007'17"
--------
10.00,
--------
16.25'
R4
C2
(21052'42"
384.50'
146.82'
R4
C3
( 4006'27"
615.50'
44.12'
R4
C4
(46007'57"
50.00'
40.26'
R4
C5
(29007'48"
35.00'
17.79'
R4
C6
( 5050'29"
615.50'
62.75'
R4
C7
(41002'11"
50.00'
35.81'
R4
C8
(31034'47"
35.00'
19.29'
R4
C9
(31015'22"
35.00'
19.09'
R4
C10
(38033'15"
50.00'
33.64'
R4.
SHEET 8 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
irRZ% TT H(o. 37 3@ a
IJ VII B 4 V 8 / 8 0- 0 8
4,,/
A,
c, I
(N86°23'3011W 298.26'
56'06"
/ o
5 83 72. 48, R4) W
I
L9
%
(N86° 18' 37" E
(N86° 23' 30" W
"LANDSCAPE/SLOPE"
93.93' R4)
93.33' 134) L 10
N85° 48' 45"W 432.00, 1.468 ACRES
55 ,
N7l'01'38„w
108.43
N85°48'45"W
L5 k-4 L3
L2
TO 6° 6fl
ZI
o 8 �
SEE SHEET NO. 6
SEE SHEET NO. 5
co �
c
r,i c=
co
w
0
0
0
0
0
Z
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
132)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
134)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
R2)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
R4)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
Lll
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30°10'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41°58'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31°08'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31°08'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UJ
J �
a
1. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN 30 W' J
MILES OF MOUNT PALOMAR OBSERVATORY.
ALL PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS TRACT MAP NO, 37341-14
� C7 J�-I
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE UAL IFORNIA ~ a
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PALOMAR
OBSERVATORY RECOMMENDATIONS,
ORDINANCE NO. 655.
2. THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN A
LIQUEFACTION HAZARD ZONE.
� 7 = � a
20
J
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 15 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, °a N
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 J
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. n �
J
L45--V-
L5
(N89° 39' 10"W
5282, 95' R4)-V
(N89° 39' 12"W
5282,87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
APRIL 2019 N.T.S.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ \ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' 134) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' R2)
IN 89039'12" W 319 80' R2► L56 (N 38015/2111
" E 655.50' R4)
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
MURRIE (N 38 15 19 E 655.48 R2) �,
77A HOT L46 ( N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' R4) L57 (N 0° 33' 48" E 485.01' 134) o --R\r
SPRINGS ROAD J (N 0020' 58" E 265.41 ' R2 ) (N 0° 33' 47" E 485.01' R2) N
I L58 (N 890 39' 10" W 55.00' R4)
- L47 (S 89026;26" E 126.20' R4) (N 89°39'12" W 55.00' R2 & R3) �
- ( N 89 26 26" W 126.19' R2 ) L59 (N 890 39' 10" W 601.73' 134) \��' 7 T
/V �0 ° L48 (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 61' R2) `P\� r- = `�� 16
I A, o ( N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' 132 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 50' PM 14/93-94) �'s o� u'; �, �1
I NAME DELTA RAD I US ARC- "' � 0 �1 LI)
L49 (N 48°26'50" W 30.47' R4) _ �� r a'� w ttI
�' w
N 48 ° 25' S0" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600.00' 653.17' R4) 1-4 �L23 s 0
�� L50 (N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' 34) (23° 23' 33" 1600.00' 653.24' R1 & R2) 21 �L22 (nIU; ���
\ oa \�� ( N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ► C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600.00' 59.98' R4) �" r o (/)
- - - RORIPAUGH C3 (35° �2' 42' 1600. 00' 992.60 R4) & R2) j /r � Z o Cl
\ VALLEY I I L51 ( N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500.00' R41 ° „ v Z
ROAD L52 (N 0033'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600.00' 992.63' R1 & R2)
(N 0034'04"E 1610.00' R1) J a--
8 O - L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4)
j� IN 38015'18"E 82.30' R2) �'��� ��°� Imo;
pC�j z�,o ° LO
66. l / L54 (N 0033'48" E 150.19' 134) 0 'jv r LIN
"/ H
&O pi
N53° 53' 32"W R
0
- T
I
Lf� C« �7
L�
LL,%
55' -
55'=
�� �'j�� 12��0� ��6• IN 0033'47"E 150.19' R2 8 133) �12 L13 �L14� L15 :-�� o
oo L8 Lg L10 �� �GAC�� �]0 ® 377 �� a L41
rnAclr v0 L53 �' 3734�_3 HE Zoo/go-go
L `
�.�N81°306"E 37 34 2
465. - R41,
/f(2,
N81 36 ,
E Q '
,,� tih,465.13'
(
4 `' h�h D �Glcu �/ L---�lb 2a' �a - _ HDo® 37306 I o
is �QA�� �10 ° � - � � <
O \ \ kilo a
% o O -25 23
/
d- o I \
o
V / \ No
I D
1
UG3Acu I H0®ca
110,
yin �j�nj y� � �Ja /// uG3A�� \ �
LI WQ�� uV�o �l1 �� o o O /
� W N
N �r-� ]O ° 37 3C� °
MO IJVIJ � 4 0 ° / ° 0 - c�J °
Z U Q A O U H 0 ® 1I37 m a FD 1" IP W/PP "FRANK
J & LAURA RCE 28029
QN
L49
L1
L_� 2
SEEI
DETAIL "A "
29
TRACT MAP NO. 37341-14
T7 DN. 0.5, NO REFERENCE
(422. 01 �R4 No Lzcs o 0- 0 o ACCEPTED AS POINT p
N89 26 26 W) ON SLY LINE OF / [t�V] [3 too/go-go
(422.00' R2 R3 & R4---
N89° 26' 26"W) L48 I S / \
L47 _ SOMMERS BEND= _ - �D 1" IP OPEN DN. -0-. (75.81' R4)/
FD 8'X8 STONE MON. NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS
L59 MK'D "P17"ON STY POINT ON S'LY LINE OF R3 & R4 (75.84' R2 & R3)
SIDE UP 1.2 PER (625.52' R4) (878.58' R4) 66
R2, R3 & R4 o N o (� S S e S 625.59R2 & R3(878.53R2- y
"� ----- --� & R3) -
1 _ RANCHO PAUBA BOUNDARY _T (5227.95' R4) (5227.88' R2 & R3)
ll / l _ (N89° 39' 10"W 5282.95' R4) (N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2 & R3)
�r1f� 1 1 PAR 1 � P"1R � �1 t r�f� � � I \ l � l r' /
PJ�JI� 1 '1/ PJ\J1� 15r3,/ P1�Jl= 12 J/ �r1;�, 12 PJ�J1J 1 ' ) � )� �r1;� 1 1 �r�;�,P111J -J I - � / �r1f�
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
4. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
5. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 19.237 ACRES GROSS.
6. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
7. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
8. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 84 LOTS.
9. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
10. RAID INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
11. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
12. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
13. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
14. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
15. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED ---------------- AS INST.
NO --------------
17. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑x MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 & R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 & R4, DN. 0.1'.
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. AND
RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34,
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
SCALE: 1" = 400'
400 0 400 800
BOOK T PAGE 401
TOTAL NUMBERED LOTS: 43
TOTAL LETTERED LOTS: 8
TOTAL NET AREA: 8.423 ACRES
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 11.791 ACRES
OWNER'S STATEMENT
WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY
PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO
SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS
SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: LOTS "A"
THROUGH "H", INCLUSIVE. FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER
WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES
AS SHOWN HEREON.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG
SOMMERS BEND TO THE PUBLIC. THE OWNERS OF LOTS 4, 5, 12
THROUGH 17, INCLUSIVE, LOT 24 AND LOT 25 ABUTTING THIS HIGHWAY
AND DURING SUCH TIME WILL HAVE NO RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE
GENERAL EASEMENT OF TRAVEL. ANY CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OR WIDTH
THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION THEREOF SHALL TERMINATE THIS
DEDICATION AS TO THE PART VACATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 41,
INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC
UTILITY PURPOSES.
WE HEREBY RETAIN LOTS "A" THROUGH "H" INDICATED AS "PRIVATE
STREET" FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR
SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN LOT 42 AND LOT 43 INDICATED AS
"LANDSCAPE" FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF
OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN
THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT AS SHOWN
HEREON WITHIN LOT 42 FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF
OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN
THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AS
SHOWN HEREON WITHIN LOT 43 FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE
BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT
OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT
FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
("DISTRICT''), A PUBLIC AGENCY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER
AND BY VIRTUE OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT LAW OF 1911,
ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF
WAY TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, ENLARGE, RECONSTRUCT, REMOVE AND
REPLACE, OPERATE, INSPECT, REPAIR, IMPROVE AND RELOCATE SEWER,
WATER, AND RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES, ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND DESIGNATED "SEWER, WATER, AND
RECYCLED WATER EASEMENT" HEREON, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT
OF ACCESS TO AND FROM SAID EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXERCISING THE RIGHTS GRANTED IN SAID EASEMENT. OWNER RETAINS
THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENT AREA PROVIDED THAT OWNER SHALL
NOT CONSTRUCT OR ERECT BUILDINGS, MASONRY WALLS, MASONRY
FENCES AND OTHER STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS, OR PLANT OR
GROW TREES OR SHRUBS, OR CHANGE THE SURFACE GRADE OR INSTALL
PRIVATELY -OWNED PIPELINES WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT
OF DISTRICT.
OWNER:
WOODS I DE 05S, LP,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BY:
NAME: CHRIS CHAMBERS
TITLE: VICE PRESIDENT, WDS GP, INC.
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
AS GENERAL PARTNER
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,,
37341-15
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 16 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS
CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE
INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,
ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
ON BEFORE ME,
NOTARY PUBLIC PERSONALLY APPEARED
APRIL 2019
TAX BOND CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $
HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE
PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND
ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE
TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A
LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, AND SAID
BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
DATE:
A
CASH BOND
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE
THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN
INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED
THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT
BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S),
OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED,
EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE
AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
SIGNATURE
NAME:
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE
PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS:
COMMISSION EXPIRES:
COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, BY ITS CITY CLERK, RANDI JOHL, HEREBY
APPROVES THE TRACT MAP AND ACCEPTS THE OFFER
OF DEDICATION OF LOTS "A" THROUGH "H" MADE HEREON
FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF
INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY AND SERVICE VEHICLES
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF ABUTTERS
RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG SOMMERS BEND AS DEDICATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE 3' PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT AS DEDICATED.
DATED:
BY-
2020
RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK, CITY OF TEMECULA
SOILS REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66490 OF THE
STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, A PRELIMINARY SOILS
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF CA. PROJECT NO. 10967.108
ON JUNE 25, 2018, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECLULA.
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
IN
20—.
TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE
DEPUTY
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS
OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE
PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY,
MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXES, OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES NOW A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED
TO BE $
DATE:
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
20.
DEPUTY
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE
SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR
OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED:
AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
OF CALIFORNIA FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
0. R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'S
ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE EASEMENT DEDICATED ON THIS MAP TO THE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT IS HEREBY ACCEPTED AND THE
DISTRICT CONSENTS TO THE RECORDATION THEREOF BY ITS DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
DATE:
SHEILA ZELAYA, BOARD SECRETARY OF THE EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THEREOF
SHEET 1 OF 6 SHEETS
RECORDER'S STATEMENT
FILED THIS DAY OF 20 ,
AT .M IN BOOK OF MAPS, AT PAGES
AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA.
NO.
FEE:
PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK -RECORDER
DEPUTY
SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS
BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE
AT THE REQUEST OF WOODSIDE 05S, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP IN JANUARY 2018. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL
MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS
INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP AND THAT THE
MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO
BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS
TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. THIS SURVEY IS
TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN.
DATE:
LAND S��\
Roy Fs
W I LL I AM ROHAL, L.S. 8805
\TF CF. CA1-\F09
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF SIX (6)
SHEETS HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND FOUND TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED
ON THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 37341 AS FILED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ON JUNE 20, 2018, THE EXPIRATION DATE BEING JUNE 20, 2021.
THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY
REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, AND I AM
SATISFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
DATED:
KRIS R. WINCHAK
EXP. 3-31-20
(AS DELEGATED)
CITY OF TEMECULA
2020
L.S. 6240
FOR PATRICK A. THOMAS,
CITY ENGINEER
SAND J^
Y 7c o
A
No. L.S. 6240
�
-0F C A��`�%
SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SBM
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
132)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
R4)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
L11
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30°10'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41°58'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31°08'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31°08'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD
�7 M
20
e
L45��
L 5 9
�(N89* 39' 10" W
5282.95' R4)-A-
(N89° 39' 12"W
co 5282.87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
N.T.S.
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-15
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 16 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
APRIL 2019
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR
BOUNDARY MAP,
BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR
SHEET INDEX MAP.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' 134) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' R2)
I IN 89°39'12" W 319 80' R2► L56 (N 38015/21" E 655.50� R4) -5N L32
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
(N 38 15 19 E 655.48 R2)
MURRIETTA II-IOT I L46 (N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' 134) L57 (N 0° 33' 48" E 485.01134) o --R\r
A cz
SPRINGS ROAD J (N 0 ° 20' 58" E 265.41 ' R2 ) (N 00 33' 47" E 485.01 � R2) � "� N
L47 (S 89026'26" E 126.20' R4) L58 (N 89°39�10 W 55.00� R4) N M
- - - - IN 89°26'26" W 126.19' R2) (N 89°39 12" W 55.00� R2 & R3) � � � � ti
L59 (N 89 39 10 W 601.73 R4) ra \ �' T-
�� ° L48 (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.61' R2) `p ;�
I Y o� o ( N 0°33' 34" E 76.01 ' R2 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.50' PM 14/93-94) �'s o� (n N �1
I NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC- (n �� L�
L49 (N 48°26'S0" W 30.47' R4) ��' r a'� w ttI �
�' w
6 ( N 48025' 50" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600. 00' 653.17' R4) v ,L23 s t'� C)
L50 ( N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' R4) (23° 23' 33" 1600. 00' 653. 24' R1 & R2) 21 �L22 U;
N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ► C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600. 00' 59.98' R4) �" r r o
- - - RORIPAUGH C3 (35° �2' 42' 1600. 00' 992.60 R4) & R2) j /r Z o z
\ VALLEY I I L51 ( N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500.00' R41 ° „ v z
ROAD L52 (N 0033'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600. 00' 992.63' R1 & R2) �°� �� V a�
(N 0034'04"E 1610.00' R1)
0 - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4) '� (N 38015'18"E 82.30' R2) IR2 o
pC�j z � 6%, ° 66. l / L54 (N 0°33'48" E 150.19' R4) 6 r LIN
AIIL61�C":
Rpg0�4
N53° 53' 32"W R.
0�
%,
- T
I
L7 C« �7
L�
LL,
55' -
55'=
QN
L49
LCL_ 2 ICI
SEEI
DETAIL "A "
29
12�? I �0' ��6•
Lg L1(N 0033'47"E 150.19' R2 8 R3) �12 L13 ��4� L1i o �a L43
oo L8 0 �� �GQC�� �]0 ® 37 �� a L41
v0 L53 �' L `
C/�N81°36'16E3734�-2
/ �, .ti a �, 465. 73 ,R41, 't 7 0 ®
5 ��; tNg1 36
.13RZ)E 1i Q '
465' �� ��� �' ( (°���
I` �� �.� I f o a �1 � D
D 4 `' h' / L---�' �a �_ - UIRAC U 0® 37306 I o
�S �aa0� �10®y ,. ���� � m
o
56
c' o 0 0 cV o \ z
lel
do I \
o
I I L- / 24
110,
0
'TRACT, NOo ° 37
_ --
�•
zz < u R'f Cc H00 ° 37 30 °
_10?0 4GLQC�4 �10® 3734��14 FD 1"IP W/PP "FRANK--�
37 �(� n & LAURA RCE 28029
EFRENCE
(422. 01' R4 [JU] o o 7 DN.ACCEPTED RASE POINT
N89° 26' 26"W) ON S'LY LINE OF
(422.00' R2 R3 & R4------"
N89° 26' 26"W) L48 TRACT MAP NO. 37341-15 _ /
L47 _ SOMMERS BEN D= - -1 FD 1" IP OPEN DN. 0.5 (75.81 R4)
FD 8%8 STONE MON. - -- NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS
L59 MKT"P17"ON STY S'LY LINE OF R3 & R4 (75.84' R2 & R3)
SIDE UP 1.2 POINT ON PER i (625.52' R4) (878.58' R4) 6
L45 R2, R3 & R4 'T R Q C�'T H 0 ° 37 3C� o a o o ° e ° ,
� - - - - - � � Q � � � � � � � � 625.59 R2 & R3)� (878.53 R2 & R3)
\ ---
(5227.95' R4) (5227.88' R2 & R3)
RANCHO PAUBA BIOUNDARY (N89° 39' 10"W 5282.95' 134) (N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2 & 133)
.pl\ll.-D, 1 zf"/ FJ\JI.,E-jl 15r3,/ Pl\Jl= 12 J/ _PAR 1 12 _pJ\JIJ 1 4 _PATR 1 1 _PATR � P2 _pAR j 3 / pAJ�
° 93- )5 93-3--3 9 57-5-3 m 5 _j I -72 4
a
6, m
o m >_
oa
o = m
U z
z =
ao
12 [ifm
L�
N m
LL, L7
��
M
co LL 11
N
M �
N 1
o
CD �L?0�
� � J
u
T LL
M
c.fl
N \
W
M
N\ �
o \�
Z �
v, J
LL'
L�
SHEET 2 OF 6 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
4. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
5. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 11.791 ACRES GROSS.
6. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
7. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
8. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 43 LOTS.
9. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
10. RAID INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
11. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
12. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
13. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
14. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
15. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED ---------------- AS INST.
NO --------------
17. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑X MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 & R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 & R4, DN. 0.1'.
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. AND
RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34,
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
SCALE: 1" = 400'
400 0 400 800
AULD RD ,
0
MURRIETq HOT 2
p
SPRINGS RD S/TE
'o
79
Ro
NjC4�-AS
cn o0
CANTRELL
RD
m m
LA SERENA
v
15
WAY
v
MARGARITA
�0
RD
o
f
9�
MEADOWS
PKWY
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
_-J--
SEDGE WAy
---
�
c�
u
Zi
a �
J
O
-ccI
J
0
o0 0
Q
E5
It
w
o cr
o�
o�
z �
W
o ;T
o
00
0
�o
O O
Z
N)
� v`O
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS SHEET AFFECTING
THIS MAP IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE OF
THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECULA, IN E.C.S.
BOOK T , PAGE 402 . THIS AFFECTS ALL LOTS.
(N86023'30"W
(328.13' R4)
\, N27" 54' 1_0" W RAD PRC
pp°w
lN��°ppo �ql
5•
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-15
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 16 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
I
I
I
I
I
BOUNDARY MAP APRIL 2019
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
----
Ll
----------------
(N
72-01'00"
W
---------
50.00'
134)
C1
(17-59'00"
750.00'
235.40'
R4
L2
(N
90000'00"
W
190.00'
R4)
C2
( 5°51'03"
750.00'
76.59'
R4
L3
(N
76055'53"
W
25.63'
R4)
C3
( 5°51'03"
713.00'
72.81'
R4
L4
(N
14047'38"
E
41.04'
R4)
C4
(17-59'00"
713.00'
223.79'
R4
L5
(N
02034'23"
W
40.15'
R4)
C5
(22°37'29"
787.00'
310.77'
R4
L6
(N
46017'12"
W
37.32'
R4)
C6
(40°58'16"
50.00'
35.75'
R4
L7
(N
45000'00"
E
38.18'
R4)
C7
(31°30'40"
35.00'
19.25'
R4
L8
(N
17022'01"
W
41.04'
R4)
C8
(69°22'59"
68.00'
82.35'
R4
L9
(N
16024'58"
W
77.09'
R4)
C9
(17°22'01"
102.00'
30.92'
R4
L10
(N
05051'03"
W
88.53'
R4)
C10
(17°30'35"
102.00'
31.17'
R4
L11
(N
76048'13"
W
71.04'
R4)
C11
(95-04'36"
68.00'
112.84'
R4
L12
(N
0021'36"
E
2636.10'
R4)
C12
(41°06'07"
50.00'
35.87'
R4
(N
0021'34"
E
2636.07'
R2 8 R3)
C13
(31°22'02"
35.00'
19.16'
R4
L13
(N
0033'48"
E
150.19'
R4)
C14
( 2°08'06"
1691.50'
63.03'
R4
(N
0033'47"
E
150.19'
R2 8 R3)
NO3° 27' 42" E RAD PRC
-----
501.20' R4) \ /
(A=13046' 29" R=1691.50' L=406.66' R4)
(A=11 ° 38' 23" L=343. 63' R4)
173.06' 1 \` C14
LLI Q QO Z
o ,� IN N01 ° 19' 36" E RAD
o N
Cli
w
�j
v
U
r
"' N89° 51' 26"W RAID
l6 �1
(N90° 00' 00" E 290.42' 34 )
TRACT MAP NO. 37341-15
N04_38� 29 W_RADJ _
C743-
'59 22R=750.00' LR4) M' 1
\ \
\ O
0
\ C1
\, ti
-00 28' 03.697"
CONVERGENCE ANGLE
AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 21
SHEET 3 OF 6 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 , AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 28° 53'23" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354'.
LEGEND
INDICATES
BOUNDARY
INDICATES
CENTER LINE
INDICATES
LOT LINE
INDICATES
EXISTING LOT LINE
INDICATES
FOUND AS NOTED.
■
INDICATES
1" IRON PIPE TAGGED
LS 8805,
FLUSH TO BE SET PER
TRACT MAP
37368, MB 468/89-98.
O
INDICATES
SET 1" IRON PIPE
TAGGED LS
8805, FLUSH.
INDICATES
CONTINUOUS OPERATING
REFERENCE
STATIONS
(CORS, AS
NOTED).
SCALE: 1" = 100'
CORS STATION "BILL"
0 0 100 0 160 200 E 6313564. �750
w N88° 29' 38" E
w 5295.87' (GRID) 10
' 47" E g N880 29' 38" E � 6 � � ��0.�/
J (N82° 26 21
R4) 5296.39' <
7 6 50 .10'
�(N88° 29' 37" E
20 21 5296.39' �� ���
LLJ
....I Q ��/ O N OO � o2f N
w uVll o o o / o ctiJ o ctiJ o �I �J^co Z/ Z N�a, ��O ago
rn�I 12
ti c
N89026' 12"W ti
55. 00' _ .9S NQ z
� , �6�5
BUTTERFIELD �0 �L L13 �� 11 9? 6-
STAGE ROAD I `G� \ �� ��''y
0
- (183.15' R4) - - - -
O (423.51' R4) , R4) _
606.66 �
L2 C3 1 (N84° 08' 57"=��0 606.66 R4)
L2 C2 ---- I
SOMMERS BEND _-----
A
O
O
7RAC 7 H0.37308 HE Zo a / ago-fl
�o• �� CORS STATION "PMOB" \
I �/o ^�ti�Q� E 2074153.126 /
��` ��
Via, �L 0P 3a2p •gyp' lG
32,w 9
BASIS OF
BEARINGS DETAIL
N.T.S.
STATION "P477"
27663.6770
98482.8020
I I I
70 1so I o
p
1
1—_ �—
o
-
SEDGE WAy
�
I
Cs�
Q �
J
J
0
�
Q
�
LOT 42
"LANDSCAPE/ACCESS"
29 31 32 33
34
L30 4
_ SEDGE
— — LOT A PRIVATE STREET
28 QmQUow�I�m
21
22
27 Z aw
aN
23
25
g
24
17
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-15
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 16 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
vaaC r Ho. 37308
19
35 'rGNAC r
H(0. 37 30 o
[Ulm 40 o/ 8 0 e0 o
16
17
GOLDBACK WAY
_
"D" PRIVATE STREET
\LOT
�<
Q
m �
15
m
om
14 13
��
m
Z
36 1 37
u- W 0
W 1
I> \
O
�a
12
SHEET INDEX MAP
LOT 43
"LANDSCAPE"
38 39 40 41
SOND ,AY
_ G
PRIVATE STREET LOT
9 8 m�
10 7 I < r
6 m n
6 A m
11 1 rn i
5 \�
SOMMERS BEND __--------
�4
una Vu IJVOO o 37 3V O
'TmAC 'T
M O ® 37 30
1
Ho 168/80=0o
2 1 is
3
0
HE Zoe/ se -go
SHEET 4 OF 6 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 ,AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 28° 53'23" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354'.
LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES EXISTING EASEMENT LINE
INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS
OINDICATES SHEET NO.
EASEMENT NOTES
1 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND
INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF GENERAL
TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED
DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
O.R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
2 3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED HEREON.
3 A PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 42.
4 A PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 43.
5 AN EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL
SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED NOVEMBER 20,
2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0479667, O.R.
6 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS
FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DEDICATED HEREON.
7 AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER AND WATER PURPOSES
WITHIN LOTS "A" THROUGH "H':
SCALE: 1" = 100'
mmmo
100 0 160 200
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO, 37341-15
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 16 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
APRIL 2019
CURVE TABLE
NAME DELTA RADIUS
-----------------------
Cl (40058'16" 50.00'
C2 (31030'40" 35.00'
C3 (69022'59" 68.00'
C4 (17022'01" 102.00'
SCALE:1 50' C5 48046'40" 68.00'
C6 24025'16" 68.00'
C7 15000'38" 102.00'
50 0 50 100 C8 1 °31 ' 20" 713.00'
C9 4018'00" 713.00'
C10 15021'35" 102.00'
C11 12014'26" 102.00'
C12 8046'14" 46.00'
C13 2046'12" 102.00'
C14 12008'35" 102.00'
C15 118009'40" 68.00'
C16 01031'20" 750.00'
C17 4020'08" 787.00'
C18 0048'24" 787.00'
C19 2021'26" 787.00'
00
�\ 0 `
I � �
m N86° 00' 00" W N88° 05' 38" E
58.00' 58.31'
7IRQo'T Ho ® IS7 30
(N86° 23' 30"W 501.20' R4)
(328.13' R4)
LOT 42
"LANDSCAPE/ACCESS"
0.617 ACRES
- N86° 00' 00" W 173. 93,
58.00, 58 0 '
S
N
(9;
N87°58'22"W
SHEET 5 OF 6 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY
CONTROL SHEET, SURVEYOR'S NOTES
AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY
MAP, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX
MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES.
LINE TABLE
ARC
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
--------
35.75'
R4)
----
L1
----------------
(N
72°01'00"
---------
W
50.00'
R4)
19.25'
R4)
L2
(N
86000'00"
W
5.00'
134)
82.35'
R4)
L3
(N
76055'53"
W
25.63'
R4)
30.92'
R4)
L4
(N
14047'38"
E
41.04'
R4)
57.89'
L5
(N
02034'23"
W
40.15'
R4)
28.98'
L6
(N
46017'12"
W
37.32'
R4)
26.72'
L7
N
76037'59"
E
41.04'
18.94'
L8
N
90000'00"
E
48.42'
53.51'
L9
N
90000'00"
E
26.63'
27.34'
L10
N
72037'59"
E
41.04'
21.79'
L11
N
14047'38"
E
41.04'
7.04'
L12
N
02034'23"
W
42.42'
4.93'
L13
N
44017'12"
W
35.93'
21.62'
L14
N
49000'00"
E
24.04'
140.24'
L15
N
41000'00"
W
24.04'
19.93'
L16
N
40042'38"
W
30.66'
59.55'
L17
N
43013'36"
E
31.55'
11.08,
L18
N
30027'56"
W
19.72'
32.38'
L19
N
04000'00"
E
24.16'
L20
N
04000'00"
E RAD
36.21'
L21
N
86000'00"
W
90.00,
L22
N
49015'38"
E
93.82'
L23
N
84011'16"
E
35.26'
L24
N
84033'44"
W
3.94'
L25
N
05026'16"
E
6.00'
L26
N
84033'44"
W
9.63'
L27
N
84033'44"
W
11.37'
L28
N
05026'16"
E
11.46'
L29
N
07047'20"
E
5.00'
RAID
L30
N
04000'00"
E RAD
11.39'
(173.06' R4) -
W
I
0
0
7.93
58.10
00 W
N
0
0
58.00'
0
I
SO o O C>
oco
O
O
co
o110
M L0 p f
°°
4,
Z
30O31
W
o29
32
$ '�
o
34 o35
i
,
O
O
O �
m
O
�QOo
/
Z
O 2
�
rn
O e-
O r`')
Q N
Z
/
--�----
�,>
Z
O
Z
o ZI
a
O
.
1`/
-58.00'_
SEDGE o
-58. 00 - 58. 00'-
N86° 00'00"W
-
-58.00 --48.65'
z /
/'
C14/
3g.6l'- -
C5
----
^h /
w/4Y co 280. 65' 'T m 2 o'T H (0. 37 30 a
- _ 120�_ N86° 00' 00" W LOT 'A" " C4
0 388.39, to PRIVATE titi c's
L2 C0 o i 45. 00 45. 00' - 6 7 263. 39, N STREET
00 NI o to
N86° 00' 00"W , N SEDGE 107. 74 � 49. 03,
,�, d -75. 00, � L21 _ N86° 00' 00" W wAY 6
Oo 00 00 2 28, �--2 ; �� - 79.36'- o
N 56.00' 8 2 �,`'� m
rl_ I i� w M o
Cs� z� 28 �Ini- Mo
® r; O 21 O O v 1 28.00' A (7
O a' � o N 20 6 7 r- z
N86° 00' 33 W 92. 00 I `-`' � oo F- co
�� , \ i ,,� I o N oN
Z 3
� � N � o N86° 00' 00" W 107.00' � � D
oo rn oo Q o A=2° 00' 26" L=3.57 -w U
27 O° Z a W (� o 10.44' N87° 25' 37" E 112.12'
3 _ io z 3 v ---,
° N73' 45' 34"W RAD �� - - 22 v, o N89° 26' 03" E RAD " 128.00
�� - - o-- I a --- No cn
- �_-1---4"E RAD w o 19 A
N86° 00' 00" W 98.64' �" m a�
O '' N86° 00' 00" W 112. 24' o A ,,��' J co 28.00'
F- z Z
� C13 O �
3 N / J� O z I C13 10.31' N87° 25' 37" E 94.84' O
r i � -o l6'
26 2 0 0 Ln o a, 5. 91' -� N m D �� (N90° 00' 00" E 290. 42' R4)
�3 / a) Q o 2 23 c� co � m o - PRIVATE GOLDBACK WAY o
C12 = I STREET N90° 00' 00" E 398.00' �-
�( N L" C> �`�%'N 109. 03' 57. 00' 6 7 o N
N86° 00' 00"W 92. 18' i _ -- C12 18 0 A r'� o
z
-! - o0 0 52.58 �`' `� 205.34'�-
N79" 45' 36"W RAD 1 v I N86° 00' 00" W '" �- 9- 0 192.66 ' io 06 LOT "D" � N
103. 5 7' a'_ l �g o o
o o 0 6 7 0`�' 1 `� N87° 45' 36"E RAD v' o,' \ l,. ``�Q4, 9 , ho C4 "V L9 N90° 00' 00" E 104.00' L8
oo rn o��/�PO `�j 0,1%'-'�(Oc•D ``b ` ono '��� �;`Slo �16' o0 8 cV �-� 0 r �J -
,rl, 25 .2 �'� R=46.04 0� 1'� ,�, ��P 6� 2� Sr, ` 32,1A Iw
Z �,� � �- q''� D:o,`° �1 • °� ' 0�O ' 00, C6 cp47. 00
24 ° 1 3/
W
0=10° 04' 23'1 5 J \� N04° , �g0 N w Z
i L=138.36' --- - 00 00"E RAD_ R_46, 2 wLu o J N
N 17 M - J Lij
ai �_- - d=12° N � �� 0 3
(A= 22° 37' 29 ��R=787. 33 06„ 1 4i 15 i- w o W o a�
Q SEE DETAIL 'A' I 00 L =310. 77' - 2. 41 '�"- Lu N 16 --30 l w m i o OJ Q o o
Z N05 i R4) ir) 1, o to �I o > o 0 __25 54�� N
W �� (� 32° 59' 24" - - - E RAD R_= 787' 48.80' ° o"' �� oo i o I o z O Z
R=750.00, - d'6 o I: N' z (n
W L =431. 84 0/ � � = )s �s 6„ Z IZ z i Lo
o � I 94. �00' O
cl)R4` - ^�l 12p, o d=5059' ; Z Mj 47.00'----47.00'
o/ L=74.474 I z� 1J l�6 H
W ---------_�/ ,0 4�17°59,0p" 9 /C8 116.67' W_R=713' LLI
QM 00' 23. 79R4) (190.00' N N90°00'00"E R4)
MF
B of �
(4=1�°59"0o - *I C16 �; W
\ R=750. 00' L=235 40 - -� 49.67° 67.00 W
R4) (N90 00 00 E 190.00 R4) 4- Cn
25 24
o �
N � �
J � �
L/2�6 L27 10' _------
A=10°04'23" 5 L24 �` - 5• ILo
5' - - -
L23 L30 J
C17 C19 - J I 5 d 11733'06"
E� (d- 22 37 29" R=787.00' 2. 41-�� T lqQ o u H o® IST'sa 8
L=310.77' R4) N05°25C18
RAD R=7D7'
DETAIL 'A' l o O o
N.T.S.
Ml
U
\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C-SD-M\17883CM-Roripcugh\Survey\Tract-37341-15\17883AM-15fm05-McpSht.dgn PLOT DATE: 10-FEB-2020 JN 16464
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO, 37341-15
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 16 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
APRIL 2019
LINE TABLE
NAME DIRECTION LENGTH
14
L1
(N
45000'00"
E
38.18'
R4)
L2
(N
17022'01"
W
41.04'
R4)
SCALE: 1" = 50' L3
(N
82 °
26' 47"
E
21 .10'
R4)
L4
(N
86023'30"
W
501.20'
R4)
L5
(N
76048'13"
W
71.04'
R4)
50 0 50 100 L6
N
41013'23"
E
35.59'
L7
N
00000'00"
E
4.59'
L8
N
72037'59"
W
41.04'
L9
N
90000'00"
E
48.42'
L10
N
40042'38"
W
30.66'
L11
N
37026'47"
E
24.04'
L12
N
52033'13"
W
24.04'
L13
N
05051'03"
W
27.99'
L14
N
80011'12"
W
41.04'
L15
N
82026'47"
E
24.75'
L16
N
77013'36"
W
35.50'
'TINAC 'T IN]Oo ® Is Is (N a
NO3° 27' 42" E RAD PRC
L4
-� L5
Mj o 14 `o o / o 0° = 0 o
19
(A=13°46'29" R=1691.50' L=406.66' R4)
(6=11 ° 38' 23" L=343. 63' R4)
N01 " 19' 36" E RAD
\\moo A
\ � N
z
N89056' 51 "W 113.99'
55.49' 58.50'
' 1
Ln
L16 w
w
N
O
0
w w Lo
z zCDw cn
�? LAw 41
1'J w w "�' "=' 40 pO p
6W LA `z
-LA39
o
36 37LA 'o_ 38 CD
71
LTI
O O
2 O
v rn � � _ _58.04'co f-0 -
�vl] _C19-58.00'- --58.00'- co
3 00 249'51 o 13
SHEET 6 OF 6 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY
CONTROL SHEET, SURVEYOR'S NOTES
AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY
MAP, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX
MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES.
CURVE TABLE
NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
Cl
( 5051'03"
750.00'
76.59'
R4
C2
( 5051'03"
713.00'
72.81'
R4
C3
(41006'07"
50.00'
35.87'
R4
C4
(31022'02"
35.00'
19.16'
R4
C5
( 2008'06"
1691.50'
63.03'
R4
C6
(17030'35"
102.00'
31.17'
R4
C7
(95004'36"
68.00'
112.84'
R4
C8
15000'38"
102.00'
26.72'
C9
17022'01"
102.00'
30.92'
C10
1052'06"
46.00'
1.50'
C11
103008'32"
46.00'
82.81'
C12
2039'09"
713.00'
33.01'
C13
3011'54"
713.00'
39.80'
C14
26057'46"
68.00'
32.00'
C15
42024'23"
68.00'
50.33
C16
12057'31"
68.00'
15.38'
C17
2012'02"
102.00'
3.92'
C18
15009'59"
102.00'
27.00'
C19
22006'14"
68.00'
26.23'
C20
17022'01"
102.00'
30.92'
C21
0029'16"
1691.50'
14.40'
LOT 43
"LANDSCAPE"
0.562
116.01'
N82° 23' S1 E 58. 00'
58. OV
SEE
DETAIL 'A'
5g"E L15
Nl1° p0
58,26
z
z o
1 CA
DETAIL 'A'
N.T.S.
1N=11° 38' 23,E
R=1691.50
L=343.63' R4)
W RAD C21
NOg q9-31 _ k
R=1691.50 � �
O
Q�
m
ol
'wo 0 0
�w
0. 48' - 58' N82° 26' 4l E Y 356, 94'
L 14 ONDER W A _ /N
S 81.49'
C20 I o 6 7 N82° 26' 4l" E 45.00' 45.00'
W 101.44' �-� - LD-T "G" of F lio N820 26' q7 E
> PRIVATE 206.55 of N82° 26' 41"E o 90.00-81.50,-
48.19' Z I STREE 47„ E 158.36'
0 6, N82° 26 _ _ -15. 00 28.00' 6, w
0 W r- - 83.36 1 28.00' o
�, I 1 o W
o �� z 2 �, m
0
N z � o
Lu `� J / Wwrn 8 00 o mo i
o j 50'
O o �28. 00' 9 � W o I w w ( N82° Z6' 4l" E w c-� - "'_
J `fl 11.00, 92.00, of '-
C6 Q _ o NS2° 26' 41" E I
a o N90° 00' 00" E 109.19' I rO i �' w Ip 2 w
N89° 51' 26"W RAD 28.00 0 0 �, o z A w o. 2 0
;� 0 o
LU • y W LA � m W 1
(N90°00'00"E 290.42' R4) �� > w ` 10 o wW 7 3��I I 98.50'
I
`'- �n rY �' 28.00' 28.00 26, RAD
GOLDBACK WAY �" �' 00' Na2° 4l E
N90° 00' 00" E 398.00' ooi �6�� 0 92' �' 1 0
N o _ 205.34' 6CIA I a N80° 24' 15"w 12. 75' N82° 26' 47" E RAD I `" s
o PRIVATE LOT "D" 0 109. 91,55. 00' �o �^ h RqD 107, 18, w . co 2 3 A
STREET N 7 a w -� °' r;41
C18 L8 00 N I ti
9
m
\ R=6 \ 11 N o
WN6 41„ E
Z 2 Q C16 -C�5 \ `z N84' 24_41 "W RAD z N82° 26'51
w ti - 93. z co
Zo N ��/ " I �`'��\ S4S N82° 26' 47"E I C1-- C1 cn w
J o LU w o' XI o o s9\\ J''� 92.00' D 6 7 / o
c:, W - / a S\ \ 4 w A
W Q w 0 14 =� of �j s \\ 7]98 zo �� 90 d'210°01���``
0 13 O _ )
o z o N; oo �i 12 wrn 5 NO]_33_13"_W (R) 36. �/ (183.15' R4)
O
W oo o `� ZI o o I w 63 Z
138.41' W
l� ,/ 148.46' (423.51' R4) 606.66' R4) -
�� _
��
55.11' C/ / t / -/ 13 ,� C12 (N84° OS' 57"E _� - cn
` -
N (N90°00'00"E 1 190.00' R4) � C2 �'Iw � 606.66' R4) W
o o 00 o - � (N 4848 OS' 5l" E _ cV/)
M I II O -- T
ti CD- -
_ 67.00' iM i - o S BEND _ ------
(N90° 00' 00" E 190.00' R4) o I C1 I o so
MMER
o -
I �
I �
'TIgaC'T IN] (3 3730o [IV]o 4ra0 ogogo �
Q
Ml
U
\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_SD_M\17883CM_Roripaugh\Survey\Tract_37341-15\17883AM-15fm06_McpSht.dgn PLOT DATE: 10-FEB-2020 JN 16464
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
132)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
R4)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
L11
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30°10'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41°58'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
R2)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UJ
J �
a
1. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN 30 W' J
MILES OF MOUNT PALOMAR OBSERVATORY.
ALL PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS TRACT MAP NO, 3 7341-15
� a J�-I
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE UAL IFORNIA ~ a
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PALOMAR
OBSERVATORY RECOMMENDATIONS,
ORDINANCE NO. 655.
2. THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN A
LIQUEFACTION HAZARD ZONE.
�7= �a
20
J
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 16 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, m N
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 J
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. n 00
J
L45--V-
L5
(N89° 39' 10"W
5282, 95' R4)-V
(N89° 39' 12"W
5282,87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
APRIL 2019 N.T.S.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ \ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' R4) LINE
---- ---------------- - (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' R2)
IN 89039'12" W 319 80' R2► L56 (N 38015/2111
" E 655.50' R4)
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
� MURRIETTA ' L46 (N 0°21'22" E 265.43' 4) N 38 15 19 E 655.48 R2)
HM
(N 0° 33' 48" E 485.01' R4) o �r
cz
SPRINGS ROAD J (N 0020' 58" E 265.41 ' R2 ) (N 00 33' 47" E 485.01' R2)
- L47 (S 89026'26" E 126.20' R4) L58 (N 89 39 10 W 55.00 R4) N M ��
_ ' (N 89° 3912" W 55. 00' R2 & R3) �
( N 89°26' 26" W 126.19' 132 ) L59 (N 890 39' 10" W 601.73' 134) �� \��' T-
/V �0 ° L48 (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.61' R2) `p L2� \� ti = `�� ;o
I A, o ( N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' 132 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 50' PM 14/93-94) �'s o� u'; �, L �1
I NAME DELTA RAD I US ARC- "' a)�� LI)
L49 (N 48°26'50" W 30.47' R4) _ �� r a'� w ttI
�' w
N 48 ° 25' S0" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600.00' 653.17' R4) 1-4 s C)
�� L50 (N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' R4) (23° 23' 33" 1600.00' 653.24' R1 & R2) 21 �L22 �; ���
\ oa \�� ( N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ► C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600.00' 59.98' R4) �" r o (/)
- - - RORIPAUGH L51 N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500.00' R41 C3 (35°° �2' 42'„ 1600. 00' 992.60 R4) & R2) j /r � Z o Cl
VALLEY
\ I I ( v Z
L52 (N 0033'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600.00' 992.63' R1 & R2)
ROAD �
(N 0°34'04"E 1610.00' R1) J
0 - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4)
IN 38015'18"E 82.30' R2)
66. l / L54 (N 0033'48" E 150.19' 134) 6 r LIN
"/ H
ROg0i4
N53° 53' 32"W R
0�
- T
Lf� C« �7
L�
LL,%
55' -
55'=
�� �'j�� 12��0� ��6• IN 0033'47"E 150.19' R2 8 R3) �12 113 Ll 4� �� � o a L43
oo L8 Lg L10 �� �GQC�� �]0 ® 377 �� a L41
v0 L53 �' L `
465. - R41,
/f(2,
N81 36 ,
E Q '
,,� tih,465.13'
(
D 4 `' h�h�'' / lb 2a L---�' �a Mlcu HDo. 37306 I o
J� �S �aa0� �10°y ,. ���� � m
/ O a
23
/ DSO/� � o � \✓� � o
z
d o I \
o42
I v��'/1 I / / 24
V 11WQ
/ \
CID
110,
0
'TRACT, NOo ° 3�
C'j_ --
�. �-
oMo
_10?0 4GLaC�4 �10® 3773����� FD 1"IP W/PP "FRANK--�
�� �(� n & LAURA RCE 28029
QN
L49
L1
2
SEEI
DETAIL "A "
29
EFRENCE
(422. 01' R4 [JU] o o DN.ACCEPTED RASE POINT
N89° 26' 26"W) ON S'LY LINE OF
(422.00' R2 L48 R3 & R4
N89° 26' 26"W) TRACT MAP NO. 37341-15 i/ \
L 4 7 _ SOMMERS BEND= - -1 FI 1" IP OPEN DN. 0.5
FD 8%8STONE MON. NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS (75. 81' 134)/
L59 MK'D "P17"ON STY POINT ON STY LINE OF R3 & R4 (75.84' R2 & R3)
SIDE UP 1.2 PER (625.52' R4) (878.58' R4) 6 L45 R2, R3 & R4 'T m A C�'T H 0 ® 377 3C� o a o o ° e ° ,
� - - - - - � � Q � � � � � � � � 625.59 R2 & R3)� (878.53 R2 & R3)
\ ---
(5227.95' R4) (5227.88' R2 & R3)
l _/ ^ RANCHO PAUBA BIOUNDARY (N89° 39' 10"W 5282.95' R4) (N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2 & R3)
PAR j 1 1 I� �r�f� � �r F 1 Pr�f� 3 I �/93-95 r l pl�lJ� 1 ' �l�lJ� J 3� PJ\Jl= 12 J/ PAR 1 12 PJ�JJJ J fl )3- )5 PAIR J J � PATR , P2 PATR 1 3 / PAf�
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. 0 INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
4. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
5. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 11.791 ACRES GROSS.
6. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
7. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
8. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 43 LOTS.
9. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
10. RAID INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
11. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
12. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
13. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
14. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
15. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED ---------------- AS INST.
NO --------------
17. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑x MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 & R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 & R4, DN. 0.1'.
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. AND
RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34,
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
SCALE: 1" = 400'
400 0 400 800
BOOK T PAGE 402
TOTAL NUMBERED LOTS: 73
TOTAL LETTERED LOTS: 4
TOTAL NET AREA: 16.061 ACRES
TOTAL GROSS AREA: 19.984 ACRES
OWNER'S STATEMENT
WE HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY
PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO
SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS
SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: LOTS "A"
THROUGH "D", INCLUSIVE. FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER
WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES
AS SHOWN HEREON.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG
SOMMERS BEND TO THE PUBLIC. THE OWNERS OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 18,
INCLUSIVE, AND LOT 70 ABUTTING THIS HIGHWAY AND DURING SUCH
TIME WILL HAVE NO RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERAL EASEMENT
OF TRAVEL. ANY CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OR WIDTH THAT RESULTS IN
THE VACATION THEREOF SHALL TERMINATE THIS DEDICATION AS TO
THE PART VACATED.
WE HEREBY RETAIN LOTS "A" THROUGH "D" INDICATED AS "PRIVATE
STREET" FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR
SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES:
3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LYING WITHIN LOTS 1 THROUGH 73,
INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN HEREON. THE DEDICATION IS FOR PUBLIC
UTILITY PURPOSES.
WE HEREBY RETAIN LOT 71 INDICATED AS "LANDSCAPE"
FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR
SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT
WITHIN LOT 71 AS SHOWN HEREON FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE
SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES
AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE ALSO HEREBY RETAIN THE BLANKET EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE
PURPOSES OVER ALL OF LOT 72 AS SHOWN HEREON FOR PRIVATE
USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS,
ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
WE HEREBY RETAIN LOT 73 INDICATED AS "OPEN SPACE" FOR
PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES, OUR SUCCESSORS,
ASSIGNEES AND LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS TRACT MAP.
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT
FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
("DISTRICT''), A PUBLIC AGENCY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER
AND BY VIRTUE OF THE MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT LAW OF 1911,
ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF
WAY TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN, ENLARGE, RECONSTRUCT, REMOVE AND
REPLACE, OPERATE, INSPECT, REPAIR, IMPROVE AND RELOCATE SEWER,
WATER, AND RECYCLED WATER FACILITIES, ALL AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP
WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AND DESIGNATED "SEWER, WATER, AND
RECYCLED WATER EASEMENT" HEREON, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT
OF ACCESS TO AND FROM SAID EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF
EXERCISING THE RIGHTS GRANTED IN SAID EASEMENT. OWNER RETAINS
THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENT AREA PROVIDED THAT OWNER SHALL
NOT CONSTRUCT OR ERECT BUILDINGS, MASONRY WALLS, MASONRY
FENCES AND OTHER STRUCTURES OR IMPROVEMENTS, OR PLANT OR
GROW TREES OR SHRUBS, OR CHANGE THE SURFACE GRADE OR INSTALL
PRIVATELY -OWNED PIPELINES WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT
OF DISTRICT.
OWNER:
WOODS I DE 05S, LP,
A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BY-
NAME: CHRIS CHAMBERS
TITLE: VICE PRESIDENT, WDS GP, INC.
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
AS GENERAL PARTNER
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP
NO,
37341-16
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS
CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE
INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,
ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THE DOCUMENT.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
ON BEFORE ME,
NOTARY PUBLIC PERSONALLY APPEARED
APRIL 2019
TAX BOND CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SUM OF $
HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE
PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL, AND
ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE
TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A
LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY, BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, AND SAID
BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS.
DATE:
A
CASH BOND
WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE
THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN
INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY EXECUTED
THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT
BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S),
OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED,
EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE
AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
SIGNATURE
NAME:
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AND STATE
PRINCIPAL COUNTY OF BUSINESS:
COMMISSION EXPIRES:
COMMISSION # OF NOTARY:
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, BY ITS CITY CLERK, RANDI JOHL, HEREBY
APPROVES THE TRACT MAP AND ACCEPTS THE OFFER
OF DEDICATION OF LOTS "A" THROUGH "D" MADE HEREON
FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF
INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY AND SERVICE VEHICLES.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF ABUTTERS
RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG SOMMERS BEND AS DEDICATED.
WE ALSO HEREBY ACCEPT THE 3' PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT AS DEDICATED.
DATED:
BY:
2020
RANDI JOHL
CITY CLERK, CITY OF TEMECULA
SOILS REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66490 OF THE
STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, A PRELIMINARY SOILS
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,
REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF CA. PROJECT NO. 10967.108
ON JUNE 25, 2018, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY
ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECLULA.
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
20_ .
DEPUTY
TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS
OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE
PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY,
MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXES, OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS
TAXES NOW A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED
TO BE $
DATE:
JON CHRISTENSEN
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
20.
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
SHEET 1 OF 8 SHEETS
RECORDER'S STATEMENT
FILED THIS DAY OF 20-
AT .M IN BOOK OF MAPS, AT PAGES
AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA.
NO.
FEE:
PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR -COUNTY CLERK -RECORDER
DEPUTY
SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS
BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE
AT THE REQUEST OF WOODSIDE 05S, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP IN JANUARY 2018. 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL
MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS
INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP AND THAT THE
MONUMENTS ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO
BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS
TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP. THIS SURVEY IS
TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN.
DATE:
W I LL I AM ROHAL, L.S. 8805
DEPUTY CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE
SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR
OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED:
AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY
OF CALIFORNIA FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES
RECORDED DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
O.R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT'S
ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT
I HEREBY STATE THAT THE EASEMENT DEDICATED ON THIS MAP TO THE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT IS HEREBY ACCEPTED AND THE
DISTRICT CONSENTS TO THE RECORDATION THEREOF BY ITS DULY
AUTHORIZED OFFICER.
DATE-
SHEILA ZELAYA, BOARD SECRETARY OF THE EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THEREOF
�1Q LAND SUS\
\PM Roy F�
•� 9l 133
I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF EIGHTS (8)
SHEETS HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION
AND FOUND TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED
ON THE TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 37341 AS FILED AND
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ON JUNE 20, 2018, THE EXPIRATION DATE BEING JUNE 20, 2021.
THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY
REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, AND I AM
SATISFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
DATED: 2020
KRIS R. WINCHAK
EXP. 3-31-20
(AS DELEGATED)
CITY OF TEMECULA
L.S. 6240
FOR PATRICK A. THOMAS,
CITY ENGINEER
� SAND f
0
No. L.S. 6240
*
frgTF OF C A��F���\�
SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, SBM
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
132)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
R4)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
132)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
L11
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30°10'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41°58'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD
�7 M
20
e
L45��
L�
��' 10" W
5282.95' R4)�
(N89° 39' 12"W
co 5282.87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
N.T.S.
APRIL 2019
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR
BOUNDARY MAP,
BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR
SHEET INDEX MAP.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' 134) LINE
- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
1 1 L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' 134) (N 38°15'19" E 663.55' R2)
I IN 89°39'12" W 319 80' R2► L56 (N 38015�21" E 655.50� R4) -5N L32
(N 38 15 19 E 655.48 R2)
MURRIETTA II-IOT I L46 (N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' R4) L57 (N 0° 33' 48" E 485.01' R4) o �r
A cz
SPRINGS ROAD J (N 0 ° 20' 58" E 265.41 ' R2 ) (N 00 33' 47" E 485.01 � R2) � "� N ��
L47 (S 89°26'26" E 126.20' R4) L58 (N 89°39�10 W 55.00� R4) N M ��
- - - - IN 89°26'26" W 126.19' R2► (N 89°39 12" W 55.00� R2 & R3) � � � � �
L59 (N 89 39 10 W 601.73 R4) � \ �'
L48 (N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.61' R2) `p
1
Y o� o o ( N 0°33' 34" E 76.01 ' R2 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601. 50' PM 14/93-94) �'s � N �� \� i
I NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
L49 (N 48°26'S0" W 30.47' R4) � �,°� r a'r' w
6 IN 48025'50" W 30.48' R2) C1 (23°2323" 1600. 00' 653.17' R4) ,,L23 s C)
L50 ( N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' R4) (23° 23' 33" 1600. 00' 653. 24' R1 & R2) 21 �L22 U;
N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ► C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600. 00' 59.98' R4) �" r r o
- - - RORIPAUGH C3 (35° �2' 42' 1600. 00' 992.60 R4) & R2) j /r Z o z_
\ I I L51 IN 89°26'26" W 500.00' R41 ° v z
ROAD L52 ( N 0033VALLEY' 48" E 1610.00' R4) (35° 32' 46" 1600. 00' 992.63' R1 & R2) ��°� V I A
_ AD (N 0 34 04"E 1610.00' R1) J
- ' *
0 - 8 L53 IN 38°15'21" E 82.30' R4) '� (N 38015'18"E 82.30' R2) IR2 o
6%, ° 66. l / L54 (N 0°33'48" E 150.19' R4) 6 r LIN
�IIL61�C":
Rpg0�4
N53° 53' 32"W R.
0�
\�
- T
L7 C« �7
L�
�%
55' -
55'=
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO, 37341-16
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & 133)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
�� �'j�� 12��0� ��6• IN 0033'47"E 150.19' R2 8 133) �12 L13 �L14� L1i o �a L43
oo L8 Lg L10 �GQC�� �]0 ® 37 �� a L41
\,A L5� ■- _
/< rnAclr H0. 37 34� _3
v0 L53 �'
��/hh C/�N81°36'16"E3�134�� �-
/ �, .ti a �, 465. 73 �R41, 't 7 / 0 ® �� /
5 �/ ��`'o Q� (651736 RZIE] C3 � �gct
4 �C� e3� �pC� �3=� \
Ho
[�t]o 40oo0e0o
o ° e�10��_\,
HE 47 V 1� 2� � �
d o \
o \ I
lel
V / \ o
I D
�WN
N �
��MN --�-- - TRACT MAP NO. 37341-16 \ I
O I'n O /
oZo p �G3QC�� (\ uG3QC 'T H(O ° 37 3a
FD 1" IP W/PP "FRANK -
4 Q 4 H o ° 37 34 � e 14 I o J & LAURA RICE 28029
DN. 0.5, NO REFERENCE
�� L� (422.01' R4] o o 7 ACCEPTED AS POINT
1 N89° 26' 26"W) L ON S'LY LINE OF
QN
L49-
L � L�J
SEE
DETAIL "A "
29
(422.00' R2 u n I C 7 H0. 37 3 41= � z R3 & R4
N89° 26' 26"W) L48 / ��
-- L51 _
L47 _ SON MERS BEND= - -1 FD 1" IP OPEN DN. 0.5 �� _ _ - _ /
FD 8'X8 STONE MON. - (75.81' R4)
NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS
MKT "P 17" ON S'LY � � (75.84' R2 & R3)
L59 J SIDE UP 1.2' PER POINT ON iS STY LINE OF R3 & R4 (625.52' R4) (878.58' R4) 6
L45- R2, R3 & R4 'TR Q C� 7 H0. 37308 m o � (� S � S � e � S 625.25'52 & R3
- --------�-T --- --)-a (878.53 R2 & R3)
a
'''-- m
� LO a
LOA N uo
OLr; oa
=o
z O U z
z=)
ao
12 [ifm
m L- L7
a
oz
U \
z
i
N
M �
N 1
o
z �L?0�
u
TL
M
N \
w
M
N\ �
o V
z �
LL'
PAUBA
BOUN RY
(5227.95' R4)
(5227.88' R2 & R3)
_
l /
JPr1f� 1 1
RANCHO
� �r�f� � �
AD
l _ (N89° 39' 10"W 5282.95' R4)
�r1f� �1 �r�f� �
(N89° 3911211 5282.87' R2 & R3) \
I
/
/
�
pJ�ll� 1 zli
�J�J1� 15-3�
� �
P1�JJ� J _J/ �r1;� , 12
_p1�J1J 1 1 )3- )� �r1;� 1 1 �r�;� ,
l r l r
_J � / �r1f�
P111J J
SHEET 2 OF 8 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
4. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
5. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 19.984 ACRES GROSS.
6. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
7. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
8. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 73 LOTS.
9. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
10. RAID INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
11. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
12. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
13. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
14. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
15. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED ---------------- AS INST.
NO --------------
17. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑x MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 & R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD & NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 & R4, DN. 0.1'.
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. AND
RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34,
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
SCALE: 1" = 400'
400 0 400 800
AULD RDo
MURRIETq HOT 2
p
SPRINGS RD S/TE
'o
9
RO
NjC4�-p5
cn o0
CANTRELL
RD
m m
LA SERENA
-11
v
15
WAY
v
MARGARITA
�0
RD
o
f
9
MEADOWS
PKWY
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS SHEET AFFECTING
THIS MAP IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE OF
THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECULA, IN E.C.S.
BOOK T , PAGE 403 . THIS AFFECTS ALL LOTS.
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
----
L1
----------------
(N
85055'39"
W
L2
(N
05051'03"
W
L3
(N
16024'58"
W
L4
(N
0021'36"
E
(N
0021'34"
E
L5
(N
0033'48"
E
(N
0033'47"
E
LENGTH
74.24' R4)
88.53' R4)
77 09' R4)
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO, 37341-16
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY BOUNDARY MAP APRIL 2019
'TQAC 'T H(0® 37 34�
2636.10' R4)
2.' R2 & R3) 150
50.19
' R4)
150.19' R2 & R3) — — — —
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
Cl
( 9°14'45"
--------
534.50'
C2
(36°11'01"
50.00'
C3
(34°22'16"
35.00'
2
C5
(4°04'281"
7133.00'
C6
( 9055'24"
787.00'
C8
( 4004'21"
750.00'
i
i
i
i
P p.
i
��
0 h
ql
--ARC
86.25' 134)
31.58' 134)
21.00' 134)i�
50.68' 134) "ZR
136.30' 134)
129.90' 134)
53.31134) o �'
C1 1' CZ C3 (Az5p°10,101,
a I o
0.92'S9 0?'Qq
,ti I I ro
w4'
SHEET 3 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 , AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 28° 53'23" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354'.
LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
- INDICATES EXISTING LOT LINE
INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED
LS 8805, FLUSH TO BE SET PER
TRACT MAP 37368MB 468/89-98.
O INDICATES SET 1' IRON PIPE
TAGGED LS 8805, FLUSH.
INDICATES CONTINUOUS OPERATING
REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS, AS NOTED).
CORS STATION "BILL"
N 2154995.0380
E 6313564.1750
. Q II Q �3j y �3 no o °
o N88 29 38 E
5295.87' (GR I D)
\AlC3 �6 / -a 9 N88°29'38"E
). 37341-16 °� � \ �� �� �6 5296.39' //��0.c,0•
�� ,;'�° \ �(N88 29 37 E �_
\ 20 �� 5296.39' ��
R2 & R3) ) wN / o
C) /
Z (nL0�cy*)Q
LO
C.D CO
�r� oaf / / rn �, 12
Ast
N
/ N89° 26' 12"W _
/ mo 6s a /°0-0° 55.00'
/ BUTTER
L5 O,
hdal / STAGE ROAD I 20 2T
v, a051
-00 28' 03.697"
N3•CC v / I--, / ELEVATION=1354'
R
43° 306
R4) � _ ' ' ;,,., I -- I M 150. 00' R4) I M s
(N84° 08' 5111E � - C7 L1 C8 (N90° 00, 00"W -�- (N=43° 3q� 5 S�MM i
' R4� _----___-- 150.00' R4) /
_606.66
— I
�FED) C2) 7 6�)� B �fl� a � ��aC��
0 0 I
NB
13
CONVERGENCE ANGLE
AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 21
s 1
9
z
\ \ /GYP
c
CORS STATION "PMOB" \ \
N 2074153.1260��
E 6375547.4700
M �� 0P O • aCl
NSS BASIS OF
BEARINGS DETAIL
N.T.S.
CORS STATION "P477"
E 6298482.8020 SCALE: 1" = 100'
160 0 160 200
�4
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO, 37341-16
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
'TIRQO'T H0 ® 37 30 o
i
i
SHEET INDEX MAP
UQQOU
MB
HOo
0 e
APRIL 2019
I
\ I
i
00
� o0
"BASIN"
— — LOT 72
43
p I
SpNpER W
SOT _
';e-L
m10
0�070
��-- SOMMERS
- I
BLANKET EASEMENT r°
FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES / Ci
OVER ALL OF LOT 72 / C�
61 62 63 64
60 65 / G
T "A'
i
� 38 \ \ � 69
39 37 36 \ \ \ 70 \ \ \
40 35 � � � 'T H 37 30
i
6 29 33 34
30
—'
/ / \
31
;.A
2 /
28 32 < � 1
VAY - - 6 /
10
9
/ / I
� I
BEND -
7R 37 38 8 �� I 7RAC 7 Ho. I37 36 $ 13
NB
SHEET 4 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, NAD 83
(NSRS 2011) EPOCH 2O10.00, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
ZONE 6 , AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A TIE BETWEEN
CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) "P477", "BILL" AND "PMOB" AS SHOWN
HEREON. (I.E. N 28° 53'23" E) DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON
ARE GROUND DISTANCES. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE
OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES
BY 0.999901821, AVERAGE ELEVATION ABOVE
MEAN SEA LEVEL = 1354'.
LEGEND
INDICATES BOUNDARY
INDICATES CENTER LINE
INDICATES LOT LINE
INDICATES EXISTING EASEMENT LINE
INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS
OINDICATES SHEET NO.
EASEMENT NOTES
1 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND
INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF GENERAL
TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA RECORDED
DECEMBER 5, 1988 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 88-354239,
O.R. CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM RECORD.
2 3' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATED HEREON.
3 A PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT
WITHIN LOT 71.
4 AN EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL
SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECORDED NOVEMBER 20,
2019 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0479667, O.R.
5 AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS
FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DEDICATED HEREON.
6 AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO EASTERN MUNICIPAL
WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER AND WATER PURPOSES
WITHIN LOTS "A" THROUGH "D".
SCALE: 1" = 100'
100 0 100 200
SHEET 5 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY
CONTROL SHEET, SURVEYOR'S NOTES
AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY
MAP, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX
MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES.
CURVE
TABLE
LINE
TABLE
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
----
-----------
--------
--------
----
---------------
--------
Cl
( 4004'21"
750.00'
53.31'
134)
L1
N
90000'00"
E
150.20'
C2
( 9055'24"
750.00'
129.90'
134)
L2
N
76042'20"
E
41.04'
C3
( 9055'24"
787.00'
136.30'
134)
L3
N
04035'33"
E
41.04'
C4
( 4004'21"
713.00'
50.68'
134)
L4
N
12046'28"
W
50.32'
C5
4004'21"
580.00'
41.23'
L5
N
56052'56"
W
23.66'
C6
4004'21"
552.00'
39.24'
L6
N
31020'00"
E
23.66'
C7
4004'21"
608.00'
43.22'
L7
N
49021'04"
W
32.18'
C8
17022'01"
102.00'
30.92'
L8
N
57037'10"
E
18.98'
C9
107053'13"
68.00'
128.04'
L9
N
79002'44"
E
42.71'
C10
17022'01"
102.00'
30.92'
L10
N
77013'32"
E
88.94'
C11
0052'01"
787.00'
11.91,
L11
(N
82026'47"
E
21.10' R4)
C12
8057'08"
102.00'
15.94'
C13
8024'53"
102.00'
14.98'
C14
14027'50"
102.00'
25.75'
C15
2054'12"
102.00'
5.17'
C16
3026'11"
1428.00'
85.64'
C17
1047'04"
1400.00'
43.60'
C18
1047'05"
1400.00'
43.61'
C19
1049'14"
1372.00'
43.60'
C20
1036'52"
1372.00'
38.66'
C21
8027'00"
68.00'
10.03'
�ql
g92,59
1N6�° q1' 16%`
IV-
SEA
3
�41 ° 2
R`16 54`50 �;19g•12 �PNOS�PPE N6a 6p•i p'
O�
3
70.12' R4) - - SHEET 8 _ - - ° 5 0
(N870 39' 50"E �, - - - SEE - _ N11 lip 50
Idi
1 A2 E \?, �, 2�00' � 2 y
��9° N11° a632' 2 `p 54 A
53
\.00 Z o \ 6'' s \y 5 p0'
w E Lg o 52 \ s 0 2qN6��`�
w N82° 31' 0111z LT, \ - X. _ 0� , Q °
61.16 l 51 r \ CZ to 0 Q` 35g•g2 i
o I N i 50
o
�49
is A 65, 08' ,�"CID 6,
23 20 „ R.1 a00' 00 „P` �� �;1gq 2 23' 33, y 6,3
C19- ° 3' 20 Vol 1A26•p
L11, - �: 2 p„ R= 5p�� �-'L'a o, 44
- - -14 C� \ o p,1 ° 23 0 - p-2° 26• gg' � o 45
5 c1 a _ ,�=60 s
CD
oa y
o N 6 \ o o L10 L=53.6a ' 46 a ��
o C16 �S 28.0028• " \ 47LA
0 �s
-
2 4"W RAD ; r �; \`� 48 a '- s 64.56'
Cl - W___ 59 2 - 1 rn \ 'o 68.39' 65.17 259, 03'
w 'C.0 21 1 pp• N �� 5a,1 a' 65.17' N81 ° 0511111
E `
o P C 15 ?Ago'
1 8g' N
u ro
N80_O1-43'_E RAD 1 ; 'o 1 11. ° 2a� 23 E 135 • N CDK,
32'1 p8, 9 N
E LAa' w
_ - ; i 'o LOT 73 N 22 N 23 24 0 g
'o a, 20 .��° J "OPEN SPACE" o o o
LA CA N w N `�- -{ 0.191 AC o 2 z °° Z
00 '�I c' Z
E g8,35' '� - --93.92'-1_ - -63. '
50 - _
N11° 13 32 1, 52' v Z ajti �ti N85° 55' 39"W 246.25' 63.50'- 25.34' - - - - -
Q 8.13 r 9 LOT C PRIVATE STREET o f C6 o L1
p�& -�_N85° 55��6' 287. 0 Fj
.0 _
I C5 00 `L1
9 �,�,� C8 !06 OLEA WAY 6 0 �; ICD
6; 19 `2 CD
N85° 55' 39"W 182. 31, Cos V I C7 N L1 �--
's A 4Q9 C13 ,C12--47.63'
9°2g r35 1z ro -63. 50'- -63. 50'- -
vo
Qs� ��Qi �.58• ,9, o �, - -
zo I o 2 o 00 00 0
Ln cj �, 1 � O w C> cD rn M
A h to cnl w' w o r� of
o ,h C -1 - I� 16 �' 15 \v rri 14 uj
Z o �� 18 w 11 =zr_ 17 (=> � � � � � a o � N 13 0
w N I� �I o �I o �v
L,, �, o t o D'I o n I o rri z o o0
Z L=63.9I Z L=60.44' o '` o0
w Z p=4039' 23" A=4° 24' 00" Z Z
52, 54 C11 63.50'
"' 13o.61' C3 �
M
_ (183.15' R4)
O 606.66' R4) lio
Z 84° 08
(N ' 51"E -�- C2
Lu W j CD�� 606 6666 R4
x � (N84° 08'5111E SOMMERS _ BEND
cn
-__
w __----
Lu
cn
I
I
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO,, 37341-16
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
SCALE: 1" = 50'
50 0 50 100
'TWao'T H(o® 37308
19
01 85 55 3911W i C4 4-
oi 74.24' R4) io l0 150.00' R4)
(N85 ° 55' 39" W ' "' I "'
74.24' R4) ti 150.00' R4)
o
Ic�
13
�aao'r
Flo ® 37 30 o
'TIqao'r
Ho.
37309
Mo
HIM
408/ 0=0
T-7
d
Z
W
Lu
in
LLI
W
cn
\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C-SD-M\17883CM-Roripcugh\Survey\Tract-37341-16\17883AM-16fm05-McpSht.dgn PLOT DATE: 10-FEB-2020 JN 16464
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO,, 37341-16
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY APRIL 2019
C'T H0 ® 37308
H
SCALE: 1" = 50'
50 0 50 100
0
1�11.O
'-
1c9
\ 'p
Off/
1
\
`\
C3
1
66.37' R4)
(N87° 43' 50"W
ti \ C5
a-
W�
�5
L6 N880 06' 11 "E
0
o o \s
68.43'
M o \o
r� o \
Z
o
SHEET 6 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY
CONTROL SHEET, SURVEYOR'S NOTES
AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY
MAP, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX
MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES.
z
,o
�N6a
co
W 62 LINE TABLE
o
R) 61 v 6 NAME DIRECTION LENGTH
- o ------------- -----------
301.20, rn L1 N 28014'23" E 25.07'
60 0Lnco L2 N 19016' 00" W 16.40'
Ln
,21 L3 N 19016'00" W 16.40'
L4 N 66046' 23" W 25.07'
L5 N 75026'44" E 36.40'
r 59 L=62.39' 1`
L6 N 88042'01" W 29.43'
46' 12"- - - - 0
L=380.47' - - Z
6, 58=5g. a 51„ 1 14„ R=528. H
R=500.00'_ LL-36� W
57 A i q1° 11 10 =
p' ��
�A 2 k-oT R=412. 00' L=340.1�� � - W
° 1'10 g 48 45
� 56 W
v, 61.6�1 �_ 50tr - z AL=80. 84' o
CURVE TABLE
-a
61� �3, 2'l�-s-(R�3 9•q2� a�' ¢ NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC
-------------------------------
N6 R1�P"E A� 53'1 `Q C1 ( 9°14'45" 534.50' 86.25' 134)
61.Op 6a° 0'? 2/Q r o 38 M �� C2 (36 ° 1 1 ' 01 " 50.00' 31 .58' R4 )
_ �w`O�`' 3c�9•g2 65,Op � " i9O, 39 0 o C3 (34°22' 16" 35.00' 21 .00' R4)
C4 14004'00" 35.00' 8.59'
N r, 5 6 SO 3' 21/ / ?, mod'- o C5 20018' 16" 35.00' 12.40'
o s N6a°0 p0' 40 _, Z C6 ( 4004'21" 713.00' 50.68' 134)
�� o_ 6'i 65• 2 6, 90 C7 ( 4004' 21 " 750.00' 53.31 ' 134)
o vC8 5000'46" 560.00' 48.99'
26•q�I 37.95' 61.74' C9 15000'38" 102.00' 26.72'
's• - i6aq0• e N89°56'36"W 99.69' C10 37013'09" 46.00' 29.88'
41 '� g2.22 2 �•r000 9%, C1 1 67044' 22" 46.00' 54.38'
•o g3.aq �„� 6 sQ s O C12 67047' 15" 46.00' 54.42'
3 2 2 0� C13 37 16' 31 " 46.00' 29.93'
2 ��', Ol° p� oJ; C14 1046'55" 472.00' 14.68'
42 N^, d 30
� o
43 30
o
a``' 29 _ ��� A9
o p2� y ,� 2 6, 31 lilA, \o-
6,
3a' 06, 101. 91 ' o � 2 , �9 4
51.28' N66 -l2. qq N87° 03' 30" W RAD �
a 6 �o ��
61.31 , 2 Z �
„
259.03 � o �h 2
. 05' 1 l E _� 28 �s s o N
N8 o `� 3 '60clio Qj o o < 11. 68' 32�
M 3 ° 33' 23" E 132.14' y a� *CO 11
`_`' 25 26 o N81
Lf)o 0 000
0 2 0
Z Z Z , �, `� �� N14_15_14_w RAD_ \ NCO. q ,' �,''`°� ''A \\•
H 4.77' _
W- - --66.50' --66.50' - - - - - - 132.35� c\\ pp. \, ° 0�' �0.' �•s , \
= o N90900' 00" E 150. 20' 0 0=14° 15' 14" R=532 T o Ca =560• , p,c�`L o \�� 5
to � PRIVATE STREE aa•pp a, ��o ,� o
00 `�' 5 N90° 00' 00" E 150.20' `�' _ �5 11 3, 33
W _
(/�to
Lu CD
6 � o LOT licit p=51 13 =6° 15' 33 6, \v6
`V oo
N90° 00' 00" E 150. 20' - 6 16' S4,r L=64.23 cp.ti 2 90 s,9 \\s cp 19)
-66. 50, 66. 50,- p=5° 38' 09 L�=64. 41 z �, o \ s� \ 3ot
9.98' L=57.84' z7
VA/
Ln
z v v, IZ \o� CID
A
o_ _o Mo oo w 8 �� \� p'
o Lo \v
3 0 12 0 11 0 10, I'N 9 c'0 1
0 o I _ , �-'
0 0 00 0 000 4 �F�, Iv `=1 p4 21,E
Z Z Z = 8.10' to L=i5.124„ N-6°
9.90 L 6 / p=6 05
66.50' 66.50' A=5° 28' 20" 1p=43°
R� /
C6 (N90000' 00"W 150.00' 134)
ooi io 56/
i
M_
- - C7 'Y'y�� (N90° 00' 00"W 150.00' R4) o-��
r- - BENS
g SOMM
� 3
No. IS �lcJ
Flo 40 a / a 91 =0
I
\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C-SD-M\17883CM-Roripcugh\Survey\Tract-37341-16\17883AM-16fm06-McpSht.dgn PLOT DATE: 10-FEB-2020 JN 16464
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO,, 37341-16
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
LINE TABLE
APRIL 2019
SHEET 7 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY
CONTROL SHEET, SURVEYOR'S NOTES
AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY
MAP, BASIS OF BEARINGS AND
VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX
MAP AND EASEMENT NOTES.
CURVE TABLE
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
SCALE:1" = 50'
----
L1
---------------
N
70039'23"
W
54 99'
----
C1
-----------
9014'45"
--------
534.50'
--------
86.25'
L2
N
03047'35"
E
33.98'
C2
(36011'01"
50.00'
31.58'
R4)
50 0 50
100
L3
N
43036'07"
W
39.74'
C3
(34022'16"
35.00'
21.00'
R4)
L4
N
43036'07"
W
38.62'
C4
(28036'58"
150.00'
74.92'
R4)
L5
N
86045'00"
E
35.39'
C5
14004'00"
35.00'
8.59'
L6
N
83051'45"
E
23.76'
C6
20018'16"
35.00'
12.40'
L7
N
15003'50"
W
25.20'
C7
4025'02"
688.00'
53.04'
L8
N
54046'02"
W
93.26'
C8
7055'23"
468.00'
64.72'
L9
N
13030'45"
E
18.11'
C9
7041'42"
472.00'
63.39'
L10
N
31014'48"
E
3.49'
C10
4056'12"
688.00'
59.28'
L11
N
58045'12"
W
5.21'
C11
2037'10"
588.00'
26.88'
O
L12
N
31014'48"
E
1.36'
C12
2017'30"
713.00'
28.52'
L13
N
31014'48"
E
19.64'
C13
0003'38"
532.00'
0.56'
L14
N
58045'12"
W
4.84'
C14
1029'34"
490.00'
12.77'
/�
L15
N
28028'27"
E
15.97'
C15
4013'46"
490.00'
36.17'
\sue.
X,
L16
N
61031'33"
W
7.91
C16
5040'33"
500.00'
49.53'
\�
`I;/Q
L17
N
28028'27"
E
12.00'
C17
5042'04"
500.00'
49.75'
\�'9
0•
oo/
L18
N
61°31'33"
W
14.72'
C18
4055'01"
725.00'
62.22'
L19
N
61028'46"
W
11.38'
C19
0001,101,
725.00'
0.25'
L20
N
50051'44"
W
5.00' RAID
C20
5049'58"
688.00'
70.04'
\
'
C21
0028'15"
688.00'
5.66'
\
r',
C22
2020'37"
688.00'
28.14'
66.37' R4)
(NR7° d'�I rnmu
L007 7�
SEE SHEET 8
7l
Z
F-
LU
Lu
ui
Lu
Lu
ui
\, N62° 01' 31 "W RAID
Aso- L14 v a
61
L 12
70 L11
L1 ��VQ
h
DETAIL "B"
NOT TO SCALE
'TaAC'T
LIVII o
//�� H (o ® �37 �30
4�0 0 0o eel o0o
a
N,
`P /� O 0Q\p4'
0 o ,� �. SEE N.
o
\4..���6o;o`L DETAIL ��B" �N• h
`��- �' � SEE a• o
�� `���,�6 DETAIL C"
cb
ti9\-1-5-
�00-
1 6ga9s-// DETAIL "A"
NOT TO SCALE
1
9'q '90
c
ON
M
DETAIL "C"
NOT TO SCALE
Ml
U
\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C-SD-M\17883CM-Roripcugh\Survey\Tract-37341-16\17883AM-16fm07-McpSht.dgn PLOT DATE: 10-FEB-2020 JN 16464
SCALE: VI 50'
50 0 50 100
Q
0
�
o0
a
�
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT MAP NO, 37341-16
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
NAME
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
LINE TABLE
CURVE
TABLE
DIRECTION
LENGTH
NAME
DELTA
RADIUS
ARC
----------------
N
57037'10"
E
---------
18.98,
----
C1
-----------
( 9014'45"
--------
534.50'
--------
86.25'
R4)
N
79002'44"
E
42.71'
C2
(36011'01"
50.00'
31.58'
R4)
N
77019'37"
E
56.02'
C3
(34022'16"
35.00'
21.00'
R4)
N
79009'10"
E
67.19'
C4
14004'00"
35.00'
8.59'
N
81020'27"
E
67.06'
C5
25034'17"
12.50'
5.58'
N
82059'09"
E
41.92'
C6
38016'27"
77.50'
51.77'
N
57024'52"
E
3.95'
C7
7032'17"
35.00'
4.60'
N
84018'41"
W
63.25'
C8
38016'27"
62.50'
41.75'
N
82059'09"
E
41.71'
C9
25034'17"
27.50'
12.27'
N
88042'01"
W
29.43'
N
75026'44"
E
36.40'
�WQC'T H(0 ® IST'sa o
Milo 68 0 6 1 0= 0
19
�;1691.5p�;19g•12
66• 6l' ,Nl
3
��\ Cg N86 20 Zi� -i- N� -►, � - � Z
�ql
gg2.5g�
1N6'e
13�3 PG�ES •20'
vol
"E
N6a° p3� 21
g6
57
�- L8 1-5
y 13.97' Ca 3 N6g6 •3A' /
N84° 18' 4632? g �Q / / 3`'° • 0.21 5 6
CI �66° A9A
ON
�� L2
N82° 31' Oi E g
61. l6'
�o
NO.
SEA
go
APRIL 2019
50
600
0
COg'
22 0.1`E
g�
1z
�11
62
SHEET 8 OF 8 SHEETS
NOTES
1. SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET,
SURVEYOR'S NOTES AND MONUMENT NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET NO. 3 FOR BOUNDARY MAP, BASIS OF
BEARINGS AND VICINITY MAP.
3. SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR SHEET INDEX MAP AND
EASEMENT NOTES.
L10
M
C2
ti
W 0-,
N88°06'11"E oo �s L(o4
68. 43' c."j) o 0-
ti o
Lc-) z
ti �
03
(34
SEE SHEET NO. 7
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET
TABLE DATA
NAME
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
(S
64°10'07"
E
137.86'
R4)
(N
64010'00"
W
137.86'
R2)
L2
(N
71°51'24"
E
60.57'
R4)
(N
71051'21"
E
60.57'
R2)
L3
(N
47054'03"
E
206.41'
R4)
(N
47054'00"
E
206.41'
R2)
L4
(N
74040'31"
E
84.91'
R4)
(N
74040'28"
E
84.91'
R2)
L5
(N
89042'02"
E
162.15'
134)
(N
89041'59"
E
162.15'
R2)
L6
(N
63056'09"
E
113.99'
R4)
(N
63056'06"
E
113.99'
R2)
L7
(N
84027'29"
E
144.82'
134)
(N
84027'26"
E
144.82'
132)
L8
(N
84027'27"
E
49.09'
134)
(N
84027'24"
E
49.09'
133)
L9
(S
84012'25"
E
129.22'
134)
(N
84012'28"
W
129.22'
133)
L10
(N
83031'26"
E
386.16'
134)
(N
83031'23"
E
386.16'
133)
L11
(N
57040'49"
E
87.87'
134)
(N
57040'46"
E
87.87'
133)
L12
(N
72009'33"
E
161.36'
R4)
(N
72009'30"
E
161.36'
R3)
L13
(N
81026'12"
E
356.89'
134)
(N
81026'09"
E
356.89'
133)
L14
(S
89059'57"
E
283.29'
134)
(N
90000'00"
W
283.29'
133)
L15
(S
83050'13"
E
159.06'
R4)
(N
83050'16"
W
159.06'
133)
L16
(N
61056'25"
E
264.03'
R4)
(N
61056'22"
E
264.03'
R3)
L17
(N
51006'12"
E
146.91'
R4)
(N
51006'09"
E
146.91'
133)
L18
(N
40050'09"
E
160.77'
134)
(N
40050'06"
E
160.77'
133)
L19
(N
45027'37"
E
97.37'
134)
(N
45027'34"
E
97.37'
133)
L20
(N
55057'04"
E
292.00'
134)
(N
55057'01"
E
292.00'
133)
L21
(N
71033'59"
E
183.58'
134)
(N
71033'56"
E
183.58'
133)
L22
(N
10059'51"
W
41.74'
R4)
(N
10059'54"
W
41.74'
R3)
L23
(N
46017'13"
W
70.83'
R4)
(N
46017'16"
W
70.83'
133)
L24
(N
30010'20"
E
129.03'
R4)
(N
30°10'17"
E
129.03'
R3)
L25
(N
41058'20"
W
153.10'
R4)
(N
41°58'23"
W
153.10'
R3)
L26
(N
68029'22"
E
150.04'
R4)
(N
68029'19"
E
150.04'
R3)
L27
(N
49018'15"
W
61.50'
134)
(N
49018'18"
W
61.50'
133)
L28
(N
27042'29"
W
157.42'
R4)
(N
27042'32"
W
157.42'
R3)
L29
(N
3009'15"
E
69.52'
R4)
(N
3009'12"
E
69.52'
R3)
L30
(N
31008'52"
E
146.57'
R4)
(N
31008'49"
E
146.57'
R3)
L31
(N
59053'24"
E
91.23'
R4)
(N
59053'21"
E
91.23'
R3)
L32
(S
80011'49"
E
146.69'
R4)
(N
80011'52"
W
146.69'
R3)
L33
(S
24°16'03"
E
163.27'
R4)
(N
24°16'06"
W
163.27'
133)
L34
(S
40°55'25"
E
372.57'
R4)
(N
40055'28"
W
372.57'
R3)
L35
(S
22046'27"
E
193.68'
R4)
(N
22°46'30"
W
193.68'
R3
L36
(S
0°50'29"
E
260.95'
R4)
(N
0°50'32"
W
260.95'
133)
L37
(S
8011'57"
W
112.76'
R4)
(N
8011'54"
E
112.76'
R3)
L38
(S
25031'21"
W
112.71'
134)
(N
25031'18"
E
112.71'
R3)
L39
(S
37018'50"
W
85.50'
134)
(N
37018'47"
E
85.50'
R3)
L40
(S
5°40'51"
E
142.81'
R4)
(N
5040'54"
W
142.81'
133)
L41
(S
89010'18"
E
85.47'
R4)
(N
89°10'21"
W
85.47'
R3)
L42
(N
60°44'02"
E
96.06'
R4)
(N
60°43'59"
E
96.06'
R3)
L43
(S
89026'27"
E
338.54'
R4)
(N
89°26'30"
W
338.53'
R3)
L44
(N
0°33'48"
E
30.00'
R4)
(N
0033'47"
E
30.00'
132)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UJ
J �
a
1. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN 30 W' J
MILES OF MOUNT PALOMAR OBSERVATORY.
ALL PROPOSED OUTDOOR LIGHTING SYSTEMS TRACT MAP NO, 3 � C7 J�-I
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE UAL IFORNIA 7341-16�-!<
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, PALOMAR
OBSERVATORY RECOMMENDATIONS,
ORDINANCE NO. 655.
2. THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN A
LIQUEFACTION HAZARD ZONE.
20
J
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 18 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37368, AS FILED IN BOOK 468, PAGE 89 THROUGH 98, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, m N
00
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LYING WITH SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 2 J
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. n
J
L45�-
L5
(N89° 39' 10"W
5282, 95' R4)-V
(N89° 39' 12"W
5282,87' R2 & R3)
DETAIL "A "
APRIL 2019 N.T.S.
10
CITY LIMIT
\ \ NAME DIRECTION LENGTH L55 (N 38°15'21" E 663.57' R4) LINE
1 ---------------------------- (N 38°15'24" E 663.55' R1)
L45 (S 89039'10" E 319.78' R4) L56 (N 38015'21" E 655.50' R4)
IN 89039'12" W 319 80' R21 11
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
BOUNDARY CONTROL SHEET
(N88° 29' 38" E 5296.39' R4) (N88° 29' 37" E 5296.39' R2 & R3)
CONTINUED TABLE DATA
(N 38 15 19 E 655.48 R2) �, M
MURRIETTA HOT L46 ( N 0°21 ' 22" E 265.43' R4) L57 (N 0° 33' 48" E 485.01' R4) o �r cz
SPRINGS ROAD J (N 0° 33' 47" E 485.01' R2) "� °�
I (N 0 20'S8" E 265.41' R2)
L58 (N 89° 39' 10" W 55.00' R4) N `��
_ - L47 (S 89°26'26" E 126.20' R4) (N 89°39'12" W 55.00' R2 & R3)c"i ro `��r
- - - (N 89 ° 26' 26" W 126.19' R2 ) L59 (N 890 39' 10" W 601. 73' R4) I� \��' _ T
L48 ( N 0033' 34" E 76.01 ' R4) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.61' R2) `p �26 \�'
/ I Al o ( N 0°33' 34" E 76.01 ' R2 ) (N 89° 39' 12" W 601.50' PM 14/93-94) �; N
I NAME DELTA RAD I US ARC- "' �
g��j L49 (N 48°26'50" W 30.47' R4) _ �� r a'� w tt�
L w
1 �° p �? 6 ( N 48 ° 25' 50" W 30.48' R2 ) C1 (23° 23' 23" 1600. 00' 653.17' R4) v �L23 s t'� C)
L50 (N 36044' 32" E 122.41 ' R4) (23° 23' 33" 1600. 00' 653. 24' R1 & R2) 21 �L22 U;
N 36 °44' 30" E 122.39' R2 ► C2 (2° 08' 52" 1600. 00' 59. 98' R4) �" r - o � - (/)
- - - RORIPAUGH C3 (35° �2' 42' 1600. 00' 992.60 R4) & R2) j /r m Z o z
\ VALLEY I I L51 ( N 89 ° 26' 26" W 500.00' R41 ° „ v Z
ROAD L52 (N 0033'48" E 1610.00' R4) (35°3246" 1600. 00' 992.63' R1 & R2)
��J ' (N 0034'04"E 1610.00' R1) �� J
0 - 8 L53 IN 38015'21" E 82.30' R4) '� (N 38015'18"E 82.30' R2) �� o o �o ��� �'��� Z3 Imo;
66. l / L54 (N 0033'48" E 150.19' R4) � LIN
�/ H
Rpg0�4
N53° 53' 32"W R
0�
- T
Lf� C« �7
L�
LL,%
55' -
55'=
��0 12��0� ��6. IN 0°33'47"E 150.19' R2 8 R3] �12 113 ��4� �� � -t-
o
oo L8 Lg L10 �GQC�� �]0 ® 37 �� a L41
\,A L5� ■- _
/< 'TRAC Ir H0. 37 34� _3
v0 L53 �'
465-131 R4)
Q� ( 651736 RZIE] C3 � �g
/ /'�� ti�h 4 �C� e3�
D lb
4 `' h�h' / L---i' �a - �G3Q0'T Ho® 37306 �
406/80-0
d o \
o \ I
I v�'/1 I / / 24
V e \�
/ \ 11WQ
I
�wNNO.
N C=
��M'n
N --�-- - TRACT MAP NO. 37341-16 \ I
O IO /
oZo p �G3Q0� (\ uG3QC 'T H(O ° 37 3a
FD 1" IP W/PP "FRANK -
4 Q 4 H o ° 37 34 � e 14 I o J & LAURA RICE 28029
DN. 0.5, NO REFERENCE
`� L� (422.01' R4] o o 7 ACCEPTED AS POINT
1 N89° 26' 26"W) L ON S'LY LINE OF
QN
L� L49-
L�J
SEE
DETAIL "A "
29
N4 260' " 2 L48-l'URQOT' H0• 37341=�z R3 & R4 / �\
r�
-L
L47 SOMMERS BEND= _ -1 FD 1" IP OPEN DN. 0 5
FD 8'X8 STONE MON. (75.81' R4)
NO REFERENCE ACCEPTED AS
MK'D "P 17" ON S'LY � � � � (75.84' R2 & 133)
L59 J SIDE UP 1.2' PER POINT ON iSTY LINE OF R3 & R4 (625.52' R4) (878.58' R4) 6
L45- R2, R3 & R4 'TR Q 0 7 H 00 ° 37 3C� o [VI] o � (� S � S � e � S 625.59R2 & R3
- ----------T--- --)-a (878.53 R2 & 133)
PAUBA
BOUN RY
(5227.95' R4)
(5227.88' R2 & R3)
_
l /
J�r1f� J 1
RANCHO
PAR � 2
AD
l _ (N89° 39' 10"W 5282.95' R4)
�r1f� �1 �
(N89° 39' 12"W 5282.87' R2 & R3) \
I
/
/
PJ\II� 1 zli
PJ�J1� 15-3�
� -P, �
PJ�IJ� J _J/ �r1;�, 12
pJ�J1J J 1/ 93- )5 �r1;� 1 1 �r�;�,PIM
l r l r
_J � / �r1f�
° 93- )5
93-3--3 )
57-5�3
r, )��71 l� '
J
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. INDICATES FOUND AS NOTED.
2. ■ INDICATES 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
TO BE SET FLUSH PER TRACT MAP 37368,
MB 468/89-98.
3. O INDICATES SET 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED LS 8805,
FLUSH.
4. ALL MONUMENTS SET ARE PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY
ORDINANCE 461.21.
5. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 19.984 ACRES GROSS.
6. DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF
BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS.
7. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT
FOR THIS MAP.
8. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 73 LOTS.
9. - INDICATES SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY.
10. RAID INDICATES RADIAL BEARING.
11. R1 INDICATES RECORD PER PER RS 143/82-89.
12. R2 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 342/73-85.
13. R3 INDICATES RECORD PER MB 401/89-96.
14. R4 INDICATES RECORD AND MEASURED PER
TRACT 37368 MB 468/89-98.
15. ALL LOT CORNERS OF THIS MAP WILL BE MONUMENTED
BY A 1" IRON PIPE TAGGED "LS 8805", FLUSH UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
16. C.C. 8 R's, RECORDED ---------------- AS INST.
NO --------------
17. ///// INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS.
❑x MONUMENT LOG
1 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", S.E. CORNER
SECTION 20 PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
2 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH, "LS 7891", IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. 8
SOUTH LOOP RD. PER R1 & R4, FLUSH.
3 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, DN. 0.1'
4 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN WELL
MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD 8 NORTH
LOOP ROAD 8 NICHOLAS RD. PER R1 8 R4.
5 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891", E.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
6 FD. 3/4" IP W/TAG "LS 4251" PER PMB 95/71-72, R2,
R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
7 FD. 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7891" B.C. CL BUTTERFIELD
STAGE RD. PER R1 & R4, DN. 0.1'.
8 FD. 3" BRASS CAP W/PUNCH MARK "LS 7891" IN
WELL MONUMENT, CL INT. BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD. AND
RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
9 FD. 2" IP W/TAG "LS 3483" N.W. CORNER
SECTION 21. PER R1 8 R4, FLUSH.
10 FD. 2 1/4" BRASS CAP ON TOP OF 2 1/4" IP
ON CONCRETE, STAMPED N.E. CORNER
SECTION 21, PER RS 100/52-57, RS 87/28-34,
R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.1'.
11 FD STONE MON. W/"P-16" SCRIBED ON S'LY
FACE W/TACK FOR S.E. CORNER SECTION 21
PER R2, R3 8 R4, UP 0.5'.
12 FD 6"X6" STONE MON. W/"P-15" SCRIBED ON
S'LY FACE NO TACK , E'LY 1/4 CORNER
SECTION 21 PER RS 100/52-57, R2, R3 8 R4, FLUSH.
SCALE: 1" = 400'
460 0 400 800
BOOK T PAGE
Item No. 13
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 28, 2020
CALL TO ORDER at 7:41 PM: President Schwank
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Stewart, Schwank
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected
unanimous approval.
11. Approve Action Minutes of March 10, 2020
Recommendation:
2020.
That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of March 10,
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
At 7:48 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 12,
2020, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council
Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Zak Schwank, President
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Item No. 14
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing to Approve the Temecula Community Services District
Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2020-21
PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt the following resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A
REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED RATES AND
CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 AND SETTING A
TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) operates under
the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting;
perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; recycling and refuse collection and unpaved road
maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are coterminous with
the City and the City Council serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD.
The TCSD is required to complete an annual levy process, which includes adopting a resolution
to accept the filing of a report on the proposed rates and charges necessary to provide the following
services; noticing each affected property owner in the City; and conducting a public hearing to
consider approving the proposed rates and charges.
The four current service levels of the TCSD include:
1. Service Level B — Residential Street Lighting.
2. Service Level C — Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance.
3. Service Level D — Residential Recycling and Refuse Collection.
4. Service Level R — Unpaved Road Maintenance.
1. Service Level B — Residential Street Lighting
The TCSD Rates and Charges for Service Level B are not proposed to increase from last year's
rates. The rate is capped at $25.68 per single family residential.
2. Service Level C — Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance
As a result of various property owner elections, there are two zones subject to an annual rate
increase. The rate increase is the lesser of-
(1) the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San
Bernardino -Ontario, for the previous calendar year
(2) 5%
The Annual CPI change for 2019 was 2.89%. As a result, the following zones will see a slight
increase in the rates for Fiscal Year 2020-21.
Zone No. and Name
6 - Woodcrest County
29 - Gallery Portraits
19-20 Rate 20-21 Rate Increase
$113.58 $116.87 $3.29
$405.42 $417.12 $14.70
3. Service Level D — Residential Recycling and Refuse Service
Per the Franchise Agreement with CR&R, the change in CPI and landfill tipping fees determine
the increase/decrease in the annual Service Level D rate and charge. An increase of $7.17 is
proposed to the annual rate and charge for Service Level D from $296.02 to $303.19 per residential
unit beginning Fiscal Year 2020-21. The increase is due to a CPI increase of 1.80% and a landfill
tipping fee increase of 3.03%, and a decrease of $0.90 to maintain fund balance in Fund 194.
4. Service Level R — Unpaved Street and Road Maintenance
The TCSD rates and charges for Service Level R are not proposed to increase from their approved
per parcel rate. The rate is capped at $115.26 per single family residential and $57.62 per vacant
residential property.
Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the resolutions to accept the filing of the report
on the proposed rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2020-21, and declaring its intention to levy and
collect annual assessments for maintenance, and schedule a public hearing concerning these issues
for July 28, 2020. Staff will proceed with noticing each affected property owner in the City
regarding the proposed rates and charges within a minimum of forty-five (45) days prior to the
public hearing.
FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated for the TCSD Fiscal Year 2020-21 rates and
charges will fund residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance;
recycling and refuse collection and unpaved road maintenance services in the City of Temecula.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution of Intention
2. Exhibit A — Project Summary
3. Preliminary Engineer's Report
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING THE
FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE
PROPOSED RATES AND CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR
2020-21 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989,
voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to
provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction.
Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, the TCSD has prescribed,
revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have
these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at
the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes collected within the
TCSD in the same manner prescribed by Government Code Section 61115. The TCSD proposes
to continue such rates and charges for the operation, maintenance, servicing and administration
of street lights, perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance, refuse collection, and unpaved
street maintenance for the 2020-21 Fiscal Year. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and
enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of
delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, shall be applicable to these rates
and charges, except for the California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831.
Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, the TCSD has caused a written
report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD. This Report contains
a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for
Fiscal Year 2020-21. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of Directors for
the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided including necessary
staff and administrative expenses. A summary of the Report containing the proposed rates and
charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by
this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD, and is
available for public inspection.
Section 4. The Board of Directors hereby acknowledges the filing of the Report, and
appoints the 28th day of July, 2020, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as feasible, in
the City Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, as
the time and place for the public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At
the public hearing, the Board of Directors will hear and consider all objections or protests, if any,
to the Report. The Board may continue the hearing from time to time.
Section 5. The District Secretary is hereby directed to give notice of the filing of the
Report and of the time and place of the hearing on the Report pursuant to the requirements of
Government Code Section 61115. The District Secretary is further directed to give notice,
pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution, regarding any increases
proposed in the Report with respect to any of the rates and charges.
Section 6. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 261h day of May, 2020.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Zac Schwank, President
N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of
Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2020- was duly and
regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the
City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
K3
FXHIRIT A
PROJECT SUMMARY
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
On January 28, 2014, Albert A. Webb Associates was retained by the City of Temecula
to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for
Fiscal Year 2020-21. Pursuant to Government Code of the State of California, commencing
with Section 61115, the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to
carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it.
The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification
and description of each parcel within a specific Service Level. A Service Level is a defined area
that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those
parcels contained within that service level boundary.
The TCSD is currently composed of four (4) Service Levels, as described below:
Service Level B — Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility
costs and administration of all residential streetlights.
2. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations,
maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
3. Service Level D — Recycling and Refuse Collection. Operations and
administration of the recycling and refuse collection program for single-family
residential dwellings.
4. Service Level R — Unpaved Road Maintenance. Maintenance of unpaved streets
and roads.
The Financial Analysis contained herein contains each Service Level including their totals for
Fiscal Year 2020-21 as follows:
Service Level B
Service Level C
Service Level D
Service Level R
TOTAL TCSD BUDGET
*Single Family Residential
SERVICE LEVEL Rate
RI in(C FT
$575,723 $25.68/SFR*
$1,822,480 Variable
$8,685,982 $303.19
$15,150 Variable
$11,099,335
The Levy and Collection amounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year
2020-21 are as shown on the Levy Roll on file with the City Clerk/District Secretary.
Webb
MUNICIPAL IPAL rINANC.r
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2020-2021
Temecula Community Services District
Service Levels B, C, R and Recycling & Refuse Collection
Prepared For
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
May 2020
Vml
Jn�� r -,
ALti
Table of Contents
Sections
Tables
Section i. Engineer's Statement
Section 1.
Description of Services
1
Section 2.
Budgets and Levy Summary
2
Section 3.
District Services and Charges
10
Section 4.
Changes to the District
15
Section 5.
Method of Apportionment
17
Section 6.
Tax Roll
20
Table 2-1.
Operating Budget Summary for Service Levels B, D and R
3
Table 2-2.
Operating Budget for Service Level C
4
Table 2-3.
Year over Year Budget Comparison
9
Table 3-1.
Service Level B
10
Table 3-2.
Service Level C
11
Table 5-1.
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level B
17
Table 5-2.
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level C
18
Table 5-3.
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level R
19
Table 5-4.
Parcel Charge Calculation Refuse/Recycling Collection
19
Appendices
Appendix A. Tax Roll A-1
i. Engineer's Statement
AGENCY: CITY OF TEMECULA
PROJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS
CITY OF TEMECULA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
REPORT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 61115
Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, this Report is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service Level
B, Service Level C, Service Level R and Refuse/Recycling Collection rates and charges for the parcels and territories within
the District. A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard
regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing,
and review of the Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following
final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for
Fiscal Year 2020-2021. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller and
included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
SECTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES of the areas covered and the services provided for the Fiscal Year. The description
of services shows and describes the existing improvements and is sufficient in showing and describing the
general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.
SECTION 2 A BUDGETS AND LEVY SUMMARY by Service Level of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for
the mentioned Fiscal Year.
SECTION 3 A description of the DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGES by Service Level, describing the method used to
apportion the District charges.
SECTION 4 CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT contains details of changes that have occurred within the District since its
inception that could affect the levy.
SECTION 5 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT used to calculate the levy for each of the Service Levels.
SECTION 6 The TAx ROLL information.
Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection)
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
i. Engineer's Statement
WHEREAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (the "City"), effective December 1, 1989 voters approved the
formation of the Temecula Community Services District (the "District") to provide specified services previously provided by
the County of Riverside (the "County") to properties within its jurisdiction. The boundary of the District is coterminous with
the City boundary and includes all parcels within the City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors (the "Board")
for the District. The District collects property -related fees and charges ("Charges") in order to provide services and maintain
the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and Charges were set and established, pursuant to the
Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code ("CSD Law").
WHEREAS, each fiscal year, an Engineer's Annual Levy Report (the "Report") is prepared, filed, and approved by the
Board. This Report describes the District, any changes to the District, and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The word
"parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number or
Assessor's Parcel Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses
Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify, on the tax roll, properties charged for District services. The
Charges contained in the Report are based on the historical and estimated costs to service properties within the District.
The services provided by the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and
include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services provided to the parcel.
The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope protection, and refuse collection in
numerous residential developments as well as unpaved road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the
District.
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115 the District has prescribed, revised, and collected rates and
charges for residential street lighting ("Service Level B"), perimeter landscaping ("Service Level C"), unpaved road
maintenance ("Service Level R"), and Refuse/Recycling Collection services furnished by the District, and has elected to have
these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as,
together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Section 61115.
Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) II
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
i. Engineer's Statement
Now, THEREFORE, I Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and
retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the Temecula
Community Services District, pursuant to the XSD Law", do hereby submit the following:
The District requested Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file an Engineer's Levy Report for Temecula
Community Services District (Levels B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) pursuant to the Government Code Section
61115, presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be
maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations, and servicing of the improvements for Service Levels
B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection, for the referenced Fiscal Year, an assessment of the estimated costs of the
maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels
within each Service Level and Refuse/Recycling Collection in proportion to the special benefit received;
This Report and the information contained herein reflect the proposed budget for each of the various services provided by
the District and the rates and charges applicable to those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the
Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the
lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by
the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District. Please note that Albert A. Webb Associates provides
engineering advice and related consulting services. Albert A. Webb Associates is not a registered municipal advisor and
does not participate in municipal advisory activities, and nothing in this Engineer's Report is, or should be interpreted to be,
municipal advisory services or advice.
Executed this day of 2020.
P�pFESSIp��
A",
� z
w NL . 37385 m
a �
'ram eIV1�- 7/
OF-CALII4'!//
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385
ENGINEER OF WORK
ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessments and all matters in the Engineer's Report were
made on the day of 2020, by adoption of Resolution No. by the Board
of Directors.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Tax Roll and Engineer's Annual Levy Report were filed in the office of the City Clerk on the
day of
12020.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF TEMECULA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection)
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
1. Description of Services
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the City. The District
provides certain property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate and distinct services referred to
as "Service Levels". Each parcel within the District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the
parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services provided. All parcels identified within a Service
Level share in the cost of the service. The costs associated with the service are spread among all properties within that
Service Level to which the service is provided in accordance with the Method of Apportionment of the specific service level.
Services and improvements provided throughout the District include residential street lighting, perimeter landscape
maintenance and slope protection, unpaved road improvement construction and maintenance, and a refuse and recycling
collection program. The Service Levels are identified as follows:
Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting
Services include the operation, maintenance, utility costs, and administration of residential streetlights.
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping
Services include the operation, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration of all perimeter landscaping
and slope maintenance areas maintained by the District.
Service Level R - Unpaved Road Maintenance
Services include the operation and administration of certain unpaved streets and roads maintained by the District.
Refuse/Recycling Collection
Services include the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program for single-family dwellings.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection)
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
The budgets for each Service Level are shown below. Each Service Level provides different and specific services and
improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the services and improvements are levied for are
included in each of the Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge per Levy Unit" (shown in Table 2-2),
reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly spreads the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The
"Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and Refuse/Recycling Collection is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level
R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit ("PDU"), which is similar to a per parcel count but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the
"Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to Section 5, Method of Apportionment.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 2
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
Table 2-1
Service Levels B, D and R Operating Budget Summary for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2021
PERSONNEL
Services
$22,718 1
$59,460
$0
$82,178
Subtotal Personnel Services
$22,718
$59,460
$0
$82,178
OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE
5200'S
Repair & Maintenance Facilities
5212
$0
$0
$0
$0
Office Supplies
5220
$0
$0
$0
$0
Printing
5222
$0
$0
$0
$0
Election Costs (Offset by Developer Deposits)
5225
$0
$0
$0
$0
Dues and Memberships
5226
$0
$5,916
$0
$5,916
Postage and Packaging
5230
$0
$0
$0
$0
Property Tax Administrative Fees
5231
$13,005
$15,300
$150
$28,455
Utilities
5240
$0
$0
$0
$0
Small Tools and Equipment
5242
$0
$5,100
$0
$5,100
Consulting Services
5248
$0
$0
$0
$0
Other Outside Services
5250
$0
$18,523
$0
$18,523
Public Notices
5256
$0
$15,300
$0
$15,300
Staff Training/Education
5261
$0
$0
$0
$0
Mileage
5262
$0
$102
$0
$102
Recognition Program
5265
$0
$0
$0
$0
Subtotal5200's
$13,005
$60,241
$150
$73,396
Waste Hauling
5315
$0
$8,543,281
$0
$8,543,281
Street Lighting
5319
$540,000
$0
$0
$540,000
Subtotal5300's
$540,000
$8,543,281
$0
$9,083,281
Emergency Road Maintenance
5402
$0
$0
$15,000
$15,000
Landscape Maintenance
5415
$0
$0
$0
$0
Landscape Rehabilitation
5416
$0
$0
$0
$0
Subtotal5400's
$0
$0
$15,000
$15,000
Recycling Programs
$0
$23,000
$0
$23,000
Subtotal
$0
$23,000
$0
$23,000
Capital Outlay
$0
$0
$0
$0
Subtotal
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL DIRECT DISTRICT COSTS
$575,723
$8,685,982
$15,150
$9,276,855
EXPENDITURES/REVENUES
Contingency Reserve
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES / REVENUES
$575,723
$8,685,982
$15,150
$9,276,855
CONTRIBUTIONS
Contributions from Grants
4025 $0
$0
$0
$0
Operation Income
$0
$0
$0
$0
Other Contributions
($65,044)
$0
$0
($65,044)
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
$0
$48,402
$9,618
$58,020
TOTAL COLLECTION/CONTRIBUTIONS
($65,044)
$48,402
$9,618
($7,024)
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 3
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
Table 2-2
Service Levels C Operating Budget for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2021
Budget FY 2020-2021
DIRECT COSTS
Winchester
Saddlewood Creek
Zone 01 Zone 02
Rancho
Highlands
Zone 03
The
Vineyards
Zone 0-
Signet
Series
Zone 05
Woodcrest
Country
Zone 0.
Repair & Maintenance / Facility
$1,530
$1,530
$2,040
$510
$2,300
$1,200
Utilities
$9,700
$8,400
$12,609
$1,700
$11,200
$4,500
Landscape Contract
Rehabilitation
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$27,000 $20,816
$0 $10,000
$38,230 $40,746
$12 $34
$21,504
$10,000
$46,153
$3,700
$0
$5,910
$18,700
$5,000
$37,200
$12,182
$10,000
$27,882
INDIRECT COSTS
City Admin
$34
$34
$34
$34
County Fees
$232
$297
$267
$151
$187
$190
Special Tax Consultant
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$1,500
$3,400
$3,731
$1,900
$2,201
$270
$455
$1,578
$1,799
$1,024
$1,248
$1,744
TOTAL•
Surplus / (Deficit)
($2,041.78)
($1,934.71)
($1,025.61)
$29.06
$25.94
($2,368.70)
ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
($2,041.78)
($1,934.71)
($1,025.61)
$29.06
$25.94
($2,368.70)
TOTAL•4
EDUs
327
478
408
139
223
229
FY 2020-2021 Proposed Rate
$116.00
$89.00
$116.00
$46.00
$175.00
$116.86
FY 2019-2020 Maximum Rate
$116.00
$89.00
$116.00
$46.00
$175.00
$113.58
FY 2020-2021 Maximum Rate
$116.00
$89.00
$116.00
$46.00
$175.00
$116.87
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection)
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
DIRECT COSTS
$1,000
$5,900
$6,500
$0
$13,400
$12
$172
$750
$934
Repair & Maintenance / Facility
Utilities
Landscape Contract
Rehabilitation
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$6,000
$1,000
$900
$300
$4,080
$35,000
$69,704
$20,400
$131,104
$12,192
$428
$5,542
_$1,700
$1,075
$1,500
$5,275
$12
$139
$207
$358
$3,565
$3,480
$1,000
$8,945
$1,071
$750
$0
$2,121
$28,815
$44,100
$20,300
$97,295
INDIRECT COSTS
City Admin
County Fees
Special Tax Consultant
$29
$127
$350
$506
$12
$97
$100
$6,104
$449
$3,899
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$18,162
$209
$10,452
TOTAL•
Surplus/(Deficit)
$2,397.99
($12,240.86)
($526.90)
($526.90)
$292.71
$119.81
($11,350.50)
$2,397.99
($12,240.86)
ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
$292.71
$119.81
($11,350.50)
TOTAL0.
EDUs
188
783
111
84
14
831
FY 2020-2021 Proposed Rate
$89.00
$175.00
$46.00
$116.00
$116.00
$116.00
$175.00
$175.00
$175.00
$116.00
$116.00
$116.00
FY 2019-2020 Maximum Rate
FY 2020-2021 Maximum Rate
$89.00
$89.00
$175.00
$175.00
$46.00
$46.00
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 5
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
Budget FY 2020-2021
Develop.Presley
Morrison
Barclay
Monte
Temeku
DIRECT COSTS
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone IS
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Repair & Maintenance / Facility
$1,020
$798
$281
$1,530
$100
$3,060
Utilities
$11,730
$6,630
$2,400
$8,500
$900
$24,000
Landscape Contract
$14,900
$6,034
$5,271
$12,900
$857
$53,927
Rehabilitation
$5,000
$500
$500
$15,000
$0
$14,315
$1,857
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$32,650
$13,962
$8,452
$37,930
$95,302
INDIRECT COSTS
$618
$12
$618
$7
$3,672
City Admin
$12
County Fees
$411
$163
$115
$184
$111
$669
Special Tax Consultant
$1,384
$650
$350
$1,529
$85
$3,803
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$2,413
$825
$477
$2,331
$203
$8,144
TOTAL•
0.
0.0
Surplus/(Deficit)
($839.09)
($12.55)
$870.75
($2,461.05)
$56.05
($9,435.66)
ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
($839.09)
($12.55)
$870.75
($2,461.05)
$56.05
($9,435.66)
TOTAL:00
$37,800
EDUs
744
166
56
216
46
1,343
FY 2020-2021 Proposed Rate
$46.00
$89.00
$175.00
$175.00
$46.00
$70.00
FY 2019-2020 Maximum Rate
$46.00
$89.00
$175.00
$175.00
$46.00
$70.00
FY 2020-2021 Maximum Rate
$46.00
$89.00
$175.00
$175.00
$46.00
$70.00
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection)
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection)
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
Budget FY 2020-2021
DIRECT COSTS
Serena
Hills
Gallery
Traditions
Avondale
Wolf
Creek
Gallery
Portraits
Repair & Maintenance / Facility
$1,651
$100
$400
$6,630
$500
Utilities
Landscape Contract
Rehabilitation
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$11,000
$23,680
$10,000
$46,331
$1,100
$750
$0
$1,950
$4,125
$3,825
$0
$8,350
$61,200
$107,400
$150,000
$325,230
$1,020
$1,100
$0
$2,620
$7
$95
$160
INDIRECT COSTS
City Admin
County Fees
Special Tax Consultant
$1,230
$186
$1,780
$7
$95
$87
$29
$147
$300
$476
$24,349
$868
$9,423
$34,640
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$3,196
$189
$262
TOTAL•
Surplus/(Deficit)
($5,526.77)
$21.39
$273.93
i
($126,895.75)
$1,288.73
($5,526.77)
ADJUSTMENTS
Fund Balance Collection/Contribution
$21.39
$273.93
($126,895.75)
$1,288.73
TOTAL000
EDUs
220
$2,160
8
$9,100
130
1,806
10
FY 2020-2021 Proposed Rate
$200.00
$270.00
$70.00
$129.00
$417.12
FY 2019-2020 Maximum Rate
FY 2020-2021 Maximum Rate
$200.00
$200.00
$270.00
$270.00
$70.00
$70.00
$129.00
$129.00
$405.42
$417.12
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection)
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
2. Budgets and Levy Summary
The following Table provides levy information for the various Service Levels within the District, comparing the Budget for
Fiscal Year 2020-2021 to the previous fiscal year.
Table 2-3
Year over Year Budget Comparison
FISCAL
--T-ital
YEAR 2019-2020
ENROLLMENTS
Charge /
Total
FISCAL YEAR2020-2021
Total
% Change
PROJECTIONS
Char ge /
Total
Levy
Parcels Units
IService Level B -Residential Street Lighting
Levy
Unit
Levy
Parcels
Levy
units
per Levy
Unit
Levy Unit
Levy
gle-Family
Residential
21,612
24,612
$25.68
$632,036.16
24,612
24,612
0.00%
$25.68
$632,036.16
Condominium
1 680
340
$25.68
$8,731.20
680
340
0.00%
$25.68
$8,731.20
68-2914
1 25,292
24,952
$640,767.36
25,292
24,952
$640p767.36
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping il)(z)
Zone 1
68-2930
327
327
$116.00
$37,932.00
327
327
0.00%
$116.00
$37,932.00
Zone 2
68-2931
478
478
$89.00
$42,542.00
478
478
0.00%
$89.00
$42,542.00
Zone 3
68-2932
408
408
$116.00
$47,328.00
408
408
0.00%
$116.00
$47,328.00
Zone 4
68-2933
139
139
$46.00
$6,394.00
139
139
0.00%
$46.00
$6,394.00
Zone 5
68-2934
223
223
$175.00
$39,025.00
223
223
0.00%
$175.00
$39,025.00
Zone 6
68-2935
229
229
$113.58
$26,009.82
229
229
2.89%
$116.86
$26,760.94
Zone 7
68-2936
188
188
$89.00
$16,732.00
172
172
0.00%
$89.00
$15,308.00
Zone 8
68-2937
783
783
$175.00
$137,025.00
783
783
0.00%
$175.00
$137,025.00
Zone 9
68-2938
111
111
$46.00
$5,106.00
111
111
0.00%
$46.00
$5,106.00
Zone 10
68-2939
84
84
$116.00
$9,744.00
84
84
0.00%
$116.00
$9,744.00
Zone 11
68-2940
14
14
$175.00
$2,450.00
14
14
0.00%
$175.00
$2,450.00
Zone 12
68-2941
831
831
$116.00
$96,396.00
831
831
0.00%
$116.00
$96,396.00
Zone 13
68-2942
744
744
$46.00
$34,224.00
744
744
0.00%
$46.00
$34,224.00
Zone 14
68-2943
166
166
$89.00
$14,774.00
166
166
0.00%
$89.00
$14,774.00
Zone 15
68-2944
56
56
$175.00
$9,800.00
56
56
0.00%
$175.00
$9,800.00
Zone 16
68-2945
216
216
$175.00
$37,800.00
216
216
0.00%
$175.00
$37,800.00
Zone 17
68-2946
46
46
$46.00
$2,116.00
46
46
0.00%
$46.00
$2,116.00
Zone 18
68-2947
1,343
1,343
$70.00
$94,010.00
1,343
1,343
0.00%
$70.00
$94,010.00
Zone 19
68-2948
242
242
$225.00
$54,450.00
242
242
0.00%
$225.00
$54,450.00
Zone 20
68-2949
1,017
1,017
$175.00
$177,975.00
1,017
1,017
0.00%
$175.00
$177,975.00
Zone 21
68-2950
1,769
1,769
$129.00
$228,201.00
1,769
1,769
0.00%
$129.00
$228,201.00
Zone 22
68-2951
38
38
$116.00
$4,408.00
38
38
0.00%
$116.00
$4,408.00
Zone 23
68-2952
420
420
$20.00
$8,400.00
420
420
0.00%
$20.00
$8,400.00
Zone 24
68-2953
1,621
1,621
$100.00
$162,100.00
1,621
1,621
0.00%
$100.00
$162,100.00
Zone 25
68-2954
220
220
$200.00
$44,000.00
220
220
0.00%
$200.00
$44,000.00
Zone 26
68-2955
8
8
$270.00
$2,160.00
8
8
0.00%
$270.00
$2,160.00
Zone 27
68-2956
130
130
$70.00
$9,100.00
130
130
0.00%
$70.00
$9,100.00
Zone 28
68-2957
1,806
1,806
$129.00
$232,974.00
1,806
1,806
0.00%
$129.00
$232,974.00
Zone 29
68-2958
10
10
$405.42
$4,054.20
10
10
2.89%
$417.12
$4,171.20
Zone 30
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Zone 31
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Zone 32
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total
13,667
13,667
$1,587,230.02
13,651
13,651
$1,586,674.14
Service Level R - Road Maintenance
Rate Level 1
68-2917
1 55
48
$115.26
$5,532.48
55
48
0.00%
$115.26
$5,532.48
Citywide Recycling/Refuse Collection
68-2916
1 28,451
28,451
$296.02
$8,422,065.02
28,489
28,489
$303.19
$8,637,579.91
(�) The maximum rate per Levy Unit, for Zones 6, 29, 31 and 32 will escalate by the lesser of 5% or the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"). For Fiscal Year
2020-2021 the increase will be 2.89%, the percentage increase in the Annual CPI.
(2) Zones 30, 31, & 32 will not be levied for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 as the project areas will be maintained by an HOA.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection)
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
3. District Services and Charges
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting
Service Level B includes all developed single-family residential parcels, condominiums, and residential vacant lots for which
the District provides ongoing servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements. The current rate
and charges for Service Level B is $25.68 per residential lot ($12.84 per condominium unit within Specific Plans) and shall be
applied to developed and undeveloped residential parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2020-
2021.
Table 3-1
Service Level B
04153-00
19872-05
20882-01
21675-04
23063-03
M.
23101-05
23267-02
24135-03
27827-01
29928-00
31053-03
04188-00
19939-00
20882-02
21675-05
23063-04
23101-06
23267-03
24136-00
27827-02
29928-01
31276-00
04457-00
19939-01
20882-03
21675-06
23063-05
23125-00
23267-04
24136-01
27827-03
29928-02
31344-00
06559-00
19939-02
20987-00
21760-00
23063-06
23125-01
23371-00
24136-02
28309-00
29928-03
31898-00
07401-00
20079-00
21067-00
21765-00
23063-07
23125-02
23371-01
24136-03
28480-00
29929-00
32104-00
07402-00
20079-01
21082-00
22148-00
23063-08
23125-03
23371-02
24182-01
28482-00
29929-01
32169-00
08369-00
20079-02
21082-01
22203-00
23064-00
23126-00
23371-03
24182-02
28482-01
30088-00
32170-00
08369-01
20079-03
21082-02
22204-00
23064-01
23128-00
23371-04
24182-03
28482-02
30264-00
32319-00
08369-02
20130-00
21082-03
22208-00
23064-02
23142-00
23371-05
24182-04
28482-03
30264-01
32436-00
11087-01
20130-01
21082-04
22593-00
23064-03
23143-00
23371-06
24183-00
28503-00
30264-02
32436-01
11087-02
20130-02
21340-00
22593-01
23065-00
23143-01
23371-07
24183-01
28510-00
30264-03
32437-00
12189-01
20130-03
21340-01
22593-02
23065-01
23143-02
23371-08
24184-00
28510-01
30264-04
32437-01
12189-02
20130-04
21340-02
22627-00
23065-03
23143-03
23371-09
24184-01
28510-02
30264-05
32437-02
12189-03
20130-05
21340-03
22627-01
23065-04
23143-04
23371-10
24185-00
28510-03
30264-06
32437-03
12189-04
20130-06
21340-04
22715-00
23065-05
23143-06
23371-11
24185-01
28526-00
30264-07
33124-00
12189-05
20153-00
21340-05
22715-01
23066-01
23143-07
23371-14
24185-02
28553-00
30264-08
33125-00
12189-06
20154-00
21340-06
22715-02
23066-02
23143-08
23483-00
24186-00
28553-01
30264-09
34698-00
12189-07
20319-00
21340-07
22716-00
23066-03
23143-09
24131-00
24186-01
28810-00
30264-10
Old Town
13060-01
20643-00
21430-01
22716-01
23066-04
23143-10
24131-01
24186-02
28980-00
30264-11
PM 24387
13060-02
20644-00
21561-00
22716-02
23066-05
23143-11
24131-02
24186-03
29033-00
30264-12
PM 26488
13060-03
20703-01
21672-01
22716-03
23067-02
23173-00
24131-03
24187-00
29036-00
30264-13
PM 27493
13060-04
20703-02
21672-02
22716-04
23067-03
23173-01
24132-00
24187-01
29133-00
30264-14
PM 28122
13060-05
20703-03
21672-03
22761-00
23067-04
23173-02
24132-01
24187-02
29203-00
30264-15
13060-06
20735-01
21672-04
22762-00
23067-05
23173-03
24133-00
24188-00
29286-00
30667-00
13060-07
20735-02
21673-00
22786-00
23100-01
23173-04
24133-01
24188-01
29734-00
30667-01
13060-08
20735-03
21673-01
22915-00
23100-02
23174-01
24133-02
24188-02
29798-00
30667-02
18518-00
20735-04
21673-02
22915-01
23100-03
23174-02
24133-03
24188-03
29798-01
30667-03
18518-01
20735-05
21673-03
22915-02
23100-04
23174-03
24133-04
24232-00
29798-02
30668-00
18518-02
20735-06
21674-00
22915-03
23100-05
23174-04
24133-05
25004-00
29798-03
30668-01
18518-03
20735-07
21674-01
22916-00
23100-06
23174-05
24134-00
25004-01
29798-04
30668-02
18583-00
20735-08
21674-02
22916-01
23100-07
23174-06
24134-01
25892-00
29798-05
30669-00
19872-00
20735-09
21674-03
22916-02
23100-08
23177-00
24134-02
26488-00
29798-06
30669-01
19872-01
20848-00
21675-00
22916-03
23101-01
23209-00
24134-03
26828-00
29798-07
30669-02
19872-02
20879-00
21675-01
22962-00
23101-02
23220-00
24135-00
26828-01
29798-08
31053-00
19872-03
20879-01
21675-02
23063-01
23101-03
23267-00
24135-01
26828-02
29798-09
31053-01
19872-04
20882-00
21675-03
23063-02
23101-04
23267-01
24135-02
27827-00
29798-10
31053-02
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 10
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
3. District Services and Charges
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping
Service level C includes all developed single family and condominium residential parcels and residential vacant lots for
which the District provides on -going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes
within the public rights -of -way and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with certain tracts and subdivisions.
The level of maintenance required in these tracts and subdivisions varies depending on operating costs. Thirty-two (32)
Zones with corresponding rates have been established within Service Level C.
In recent fiscal years, the cost of maintaining the perimeter landscaping for most zones in Service Level C, far exceed the
maximum assessment that can be levied against the parcels in these zones. As a result, it has been necessary for City staff
to reduce services and activities and/or reduce or eliminate the collection of funding for long term repairs, replacements
and rehabilitation. Recognizing that these revenue shortfalls are expected to continue and may likely increase over the
years as a result of inflation, in conjunction with this Report the City is balloting property owners within Zones 1, 4, 7, 10,
11, 14, 15, 17, 22 and 27 for increased maximum assessments and an inflationary adjustment that would fully fund the
estimated costs needed to provide the improvements for each respective Zone.
The current rates and charges for Service Level C is per residential lot and shall be applied to developed and undeveloped
residential parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
Table 3-2
Service Level C
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Saddlewood 18518-00 18518-01 18518-02 18518-03
laximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $89.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Winchester Creek
20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04 20130-05 20130-06
21340-00 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04 21340-05 21340-06
Zone No. 3 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $116.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Rancho Highlands
20643-00 20644-00 21760-00 22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00
ximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $46.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
The Vineyards 20879-00 20879-01
ximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $175.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Signet Series 20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03
ProposedZone No. 6 (3) Maximum Rate: $116.87
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Woodcrest Country 21561-00 22208-00
(31 Beginning Fiscal Year 2009-2010, the base rate for Zone 6 was $95.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011 the maximum rate as approved by
the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price
Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous
calendar year or 5%. For Fiscal Year 2020-2021 the adjustment is 2.89%, the percentage increase in the CPI.
Zone No. 7 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $89.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Ridgeview 20735-07 20735-08 20735-09 20881-00 21764-00
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection)
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
3. District Services and Charges
Zone No. 8
Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $175.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Village Grove
21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673-00 21637-01 21637-02
21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01
21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06
Zone No. 9 Maximum Rate: $46.00 00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Rancho Solana 22593-00 22593-01 22593-02
Zone No. 10 I Maximum Rate: $116.00 I Proposed Rate: $116.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Zone No. 11 I Maximum Rate: $175.00 I Proposed Rate: $175.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
... -
Zone No. 12
Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $116.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Vintage Hills
22715-00 22715-01 22715-02 22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03
22716-04 22915-00 22915-01 22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22916-01
22916-02 22916-03
Zone No. 13 Maximum Rate: 00 IProposed00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Presley Development
23267-00 23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00 26861-01
26861-02 26861-03
Zone No. 14 I Maximum Rate: $89.00 I Proposed Rate: $89.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Morrison Homes
Zone No. 15 I Maximum Rate: $175.00 I Proposed Rate: $175.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Barclay Estates
:imum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $175.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Tradewinds 23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03
Zone No. 17 I Maximum Rate: $46.00 I Proposed Rate: $46.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Zone No. 18 Maximum Rate: $70.00 Proposed Rate: $70.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Temeku Hills
23371-00 23371-01 23371-02 23371-03 23771-04 23771-05 23371-06
23371-07 23371-08 23371-09 23371-10 23371-11 23371-14 28482-00
28482-01 28482-02 28482-03 28526-00 29033-00
Zone No. 19 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $225.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Chante mar 28510-00 28510-01 28510-02 28510-03
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 12
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
3. District Services and Charges
Zone No. 20
Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $175.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Crowne Hill
23143-00 23143-02 23413-03 23413-04 23413-01 23413-03 23413-04
23413-06 23413-07 23413-08 23413-09 23413-10 23413-11
Zone No. 21
Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $129.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Vail Ranch Gated Community
28832-00
Vail Ranch Residential
23173-00 23173-01 23173-02 23173-03 23173-04 23174-01 23174-02
23174-03 23174-04 23174-05 23174-06 28480-00
Zone No. 22 I Maximum Rate: $116.00 I Proposed Rate: $116.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Sutton Place
(imum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $20.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Pheasant Run 19872 19872-01 19872-02 19872-03 19872-04 19872-05
Zone No. 24
Maximum
Rate: $100.00
Proposed
Rate:
$100.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Harveston
29928
30667
30669
32436
29928-01
30667-01
30669-01
32436-01
29928-02
30667-02
30669-02
32437
29928-03
30667-03
31053
32437-01
29929
30668
31053-01
32437-02
29929-01
30668-01
31053-02
32437-03
30088
30668-02
31053-03
34698
Harveston Ashville 1
31276
Harveston Ashville II
32104
Harveston Condos
32169
32170
Zone No. 25 I Maximum Rate: $200.00 I Proposed Rate: $200.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Zone . 00 Proposed Rate: $270.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Traditions/Gallery Homes 29133
Zone No. 27 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $70.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Avondale 26828 26828-01 26828-02
Zone No. 28
Maximum
Rate:
00
Proposed
Rate:
$129.00
Tract Name:
Tract Numbers:
Wolf Creek
29798
29798-01
29798-02
29798-03
29798-04
29798-05
29798-06
29798-07
29798-08
29798-09
30264
30264-01
30264-02
30264-03
30264-04
30264-05
30264-06
30264-07
30264-08
30264-09
30264-10
30264-11
30264-12
30264-13
30264-14
30264-15
31898
33125
32319
33124
Zone No. 29 (4) I Maximum Rate: $417.12 I Proposed Rate: $417.12
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Gallery Portraits.. ��
(4) Beginning Fiscal Year 2006-2007, the base rate for Zone 29 was $315.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zone 29 the maximum rate as
approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for
the previous calendar year, or 5%. For Fiscal Year 2020-2021 the adjustment is 2.89%, the percentage increase in the CPI.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 13
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
3. District Services and Charges
Zone No. 30 (5)(6) I Maximum Rate: $129.00 I Proposed Rate: $0.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
• • ���
(5) The maximum rate for Zone 30 is $129.00.
(6) Beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011, Zone 30 elected to maintain its own perimeter landscaping under the existing Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result,
the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
Zone No. 31(7)(8) I Maximum Rate: $34.42 I Proposed Rate: $0.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Roripaugh Ranch
(7) Beginning Fiscal Year 2006-2007, the base rate for Zone 31 was $26.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zone 31, the maximum rate as
approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for
the previous calendar year, or 5%. For Fiscal Year 2020-2021 the adjustment is 2.89%, the percentage increase in the CPI.
(8) Zone 31 elected to have its perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level
C for Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
Zone No. 32 (9)(10) I Maximum Rate: $787.34 I Proposed Rate: $0.00
Tract Name: Tract Numbers:
Vineyard View
(9) Beginning Fiscal Year 2008-2009, the base rate for Zone 32 was $640.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2009-2010 for Zone 32, the maximum rates
as approved by the property owners are annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for
the previous calendar year, or 5%. For Fiscal Year 2020-2021 the adjustment is 2.89%, the percentage increase in the CPI.
(10) Zone 32 elected to have its perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level
C for Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
Service Level R, Road Maintenance
Service Level R provides funding for construction, improvement, service, and maintenance of unpaved public streets and
roads within specific areas of the District. The services provided may include, but are not limited to, renovation or
restoration due to damage, flood and drainage control, repairs and re -grading, and upgrades of the existing areas as
required for unpaved roads. All parcels identified within Service Level R share in the cost of the services provided. The costs
associated with the services are spread among all parcels within various areas ("rate levels") of Service Level R in
accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the service level. Service Level R currently has one (1) active
rate level, Rate Level R-1. The area for Rate Level R-2 has been fully paved and therefore an assessment is currently not
required. Only the parcels within Rate Level R-1 boundary area will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and
maintaining the roads and streets in the area.
RATE LEVEL R-1 — This rate level consists of fifty-five (55) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets
that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for the servicing and
maintenance of Kimberly Lane, Greenwood Lane, Liefer Road, Gatlin Road, and Pala Vista. A total of 1.546 miles of
roads are serviced and maintained in this area. The current maximum rates and charges in R-1 are $115.26 per single-
family residential lot and $57.62 per vacant residential lot and shall be applied at the maximum rates for developed
and undeveloped residential parcels within R-1 for Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
• RATE LEVEL R-2 — This rate level consists of forty (40) assessable parcels that have direct access to Santiago Road. This
area has been fully paved and no longer requires service under this District.
Refuse/Recycling Collection
The Refuse/Recycling Collection Service Level provides for the operation and administration of the refuse collection
program, including recycling services for all developed residential homes (or "Households") within the District. The rate
and charge for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Refuse/Recycling Collection is $303.19 per Household and will be applied to all
parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 14
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
4. Changes to the District
Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include but are not limited to, changes or expansion in the
existing improvements or in the types of services provided, addition of new services or Service Levels, restructuring of the
current Service Levels, inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels, or revisions to the method of apportionment.
Changes or modifications within the District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following.
Notable Previous Modifications to the District
Two Service Levels Replaced with a Special Tax
On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund citywide community services. This Special Tax
replaced two existing Service Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District. Beginning in Fiscal Year
1997-1998 the below two Service Levels were replaced by the Special Tax and are no longer charged through the District.
• COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION — This service level provided for the maintenance, service, and operation of
all public parks and recreation services within the City.
• SERVICE LEVEL A, ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTING AND MEDIANS —This service level provided servicing, operation, and maintenance
oft raffic signals, street lighting, and landscaped medians along arterial streets.
r,Prvic p I PVPI R
As of Fiscal Year 2008-2009, the streets have been fully paved and there is no longer a need to assess for unpaved road
maintenance (Rate level R-2).
Proposed Modifications to the District for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 is related to the addition of improvements and
expansion of existing services as a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the District
accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing. Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels
within those tracts are included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and services for Service Levels B and
C are typically tract or development specific and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development are included in these
two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements. Additionally, individual residential parcels are included in
the Refuse/Recycling Collection when a new single-family residential unit is identified, and service is ordered.
Service Level B
There were no additional inclusions or modifications to Service Level B for Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
Service Level C
The annual revenue collected for the majority of the Zones in Service Level C is not sufficient to cover the costs to maintain
these zones. Due to the rising costs, the District has had to reduce services to the maintenance of the perimeter
landscaping for these zones. In Fiscal Year 2019-2020 the District conducted a Proposition 218 ballot proceeding to increase
the assessment rates for Zones 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22 and 27. The majority of the ballots received were in opposition
to the increased assessments in all zones, and the increase was therefore not applied. The assessment rates, for 27 of the
29 zones currently assessed in Service Level C, have not increased since the zones were established. Because the costs
continue to increase and the assessments have stayed the same, the service will remain limited and may have to be
reduced further due to limited annual funds.
The District is proposing the termination of the flood channel easements in Zone 7 and therefore eliminating the need for
maintenance of said areas. If approved by the District Board, this will result in the termination of the assessment for only
the sixteen (16) parcels affected, effective Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
There are no new inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping) proposed for the Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
Service Level R
There are no new inclusions to Service Level R (Road Maintenance), proposed for Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
Refuse/Recycling Collection
A total of approximately 38 newly developed residential parcels have been identified and added to Refuse/Recycling
Collection for Fiscal Year 2020-2021. These new residential parcels are identified each year and included in
Refuse/Recycling Collection based upon the waste hauler's updated service records.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 15
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
4. Changes to the District
The rate for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 for Refuse/Recycling Collection is $303.19 per residential parcel. For Fiscal Year 2019-
2020, the rate for this service was $296.02.
For more information, please refer to Section 2, Budgets and Levy Summary. The costs for the District represent actual
service costs, as provided in the City's Franchise Agreement with CR&R Waste Services.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 16
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
5. Method of Apportionment
Method of Apportionment
The cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each eligible property.
Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting):
The following formula is used to calculate each property's Service Level B charges by the per parcel/unit (residential
"lot/unit") method.
Total Balance to Levy (Budgeted) + (Total Residential Lots + Assigned Condominium Units) = Parcel Charge
Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Refuse/Recycling Collection:
The following formula is used to calculate each property's charges by the per parcel (residential "lot") method.
Total Balance to Levy (Budgeted) / Total Residential Lots (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge
Service Level R (Roads):
The charge per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel
charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels.
Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels
Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels
Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcel PDU (in Rate Level) = Parcel Charge
The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level.
Table 5-1
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level B
lit) Defined as Assigned Condominium Units in Service Level B for which the interior streetlights are privately maintained however, the Assigned Condominium
Units benefit from perimeter or collector street lighting funded by Service Level B.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 17
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
5. Method of Apportionment
Table 5-2
Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level C
Residential Lot Zone No. 1
1.00
$116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 2
1.00
$89.00
$89.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 3
1.00
$116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 4
1.00
$46.00
$46.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 5
1.00
$175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 6 (12)
1.00
$116.86
$116.86
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 7
1.00
$89.00
$89.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 8
1.00
$175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 9
1.00
$46.00
$46.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 10
1.00
$116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 11
1.00
$175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 12
1.00
$116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 13
1.00
$46.00
$46.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 14
1.00
$89.00
$89.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 15
1.00
$175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 16
1.00
$175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 17
1.00
$46.00
$46.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 18
1.00
$70.00
$70.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 19
1.00
$225.00
$225.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 20
1.00
$175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 21
1.00
$129.00
$129.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 22
1.00
$116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 23
1.00
$20.00
$20.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 24
1.00
$100.00
$100.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 25
1.00
$200.00
$200.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 26
1.00
$270.00
$270.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 27
1.00
$70.00
$70.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 28
1.00
$129.00
$129.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 29 (12)
1.00
$417.12
$417.12
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 30 (13)
1.00
$129.00
$129.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 31 (12)(14)
1.00
$34.42
$34.42
Per Parcel
Residential Lot Zone No. 32 (12)(14)
1.00
$787.34
$787.34
Per Parcel
(12) Beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zones 29 and 31, and beginning Fiscal Year 2009-10 for Zones 6 and 32, the maximum rates as approved by the property
owners are annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI")
of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or
5%.
(13) Beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011, Zone 30 has elected to maintain its own perimeter landscaping under the existing Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a
result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
(14) Zones 31 and 32 Zone 31 elected to have the perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zones will not be levied
under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 18
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
5. Method of Apportionment
Table 5-3
Parcel Lharge Lalculation Service Level K
Property
Single Family Residential Lot R-1 1.00 $115.26 $115.26 Per Parcel
Vacant Residential Lot R-1 0.50 $115.26 $57.62 Per Parcel
Table 5-4
Parcel Charge Calculation Refuse/Recycling Collection
Property
Single Family Residential Lot 1.00 $303.19 $303.19 Per Parcel
(ls) Developed residential parcels identified by CR&R for which refuse collections are available.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 19
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
6. Tax Roll
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for
the year in which this Report is prepared.
A listing of parcels within the District, along with the charges, has been submitted to the City Clerk's office.
Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 20
Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
APPENDIX A
Tax Roll
Webb
MUNICIPAL FINANCE
6905 Brockton Avenue
Riverside, CA 92506
951.200.8600
www.webbmfinance.com
Item No. 15
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: General Manager/Board of Directors
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Terminate Easement for Maintenance of Landscaping on Property Within Tract
21764 and Service Level C, Zone 7
PREPARED BY: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE EASEMENT FOR
MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING ON PROPERTY WITHIN
TRACT 21764 AND TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT, SERVICE LEVEL "C", ZONE 7
BACKGROUND: Temecula Community Services District, Service Level "C", Zone 7,
consists of a total of 188 parcels located in the Ridgeview and Meadowview Home Owner's
Associations. Sixteen of the parcels in the westerly portion of Zone 7 were developed as Tract
21764, recorded in December 1988. At the time of development, an easement was granted to the
Temecula Community Services District for "perpetual drainage and flowage easements and right-
of-way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing and replacing equipment and landscaping
within the easement area.
As part of Service Level "C", Zone 7; the City has provided landscape maintenance services for
the drainage channel benefitting the 16 parcels located in Tract 21764 since 1990. The cost of
providing these services is exceeding the amount of revenue collected from the 16 parcels located
within Tract 21764. In 2019, staff held several public meetings and conducted a mail ballot
procedure to increase the assessment for Zone 7 to an amount necessary to cover the cost for
providing these services. The majority of property owners voted in opposition to the proposed
assessment amount.
The Easement Deed granted to the City of Temecula Community Services District for maintenance
of landscaping on property located in Tract 21764 includes the following language:
"If Grantee (City of Temecula Community Services District) or its governmental entity,
successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement
Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of Grantor (developer of Tract
21764), with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations
of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the Grantor. "
Since the City is unable to continue providing maintenance services for the 16 parcels located in
Tract 21764 under the current Service Level "C", Zone 7 assessment amount, it is recommended
to terminate the easement granted by the developer of Tract 21764.
Environmental Determination
Approval of the Resolution Terminating the Easement for maintenance of landscaping on property
within Tract 21764 from Temecula Community Services District, Service Level "C", Zone 7 is
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact to the City since the current
assessment amount is used to provide landscape maintenance services for the 16 parcels located
in Tract 21764.
ATTACHMENT: 1. Resolution
2. Easement Deed
3. Zone 7 Map
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVCIES DISTRICT OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA TERMINATING THE EASEMENT
FOR MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING ON PROPERTY
WITHIN TRACT 21764 AND TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT, SERVICE LEVEL "C", ZONE 7
WHEREAS, Warmington Homes and Gateway-Meadowview Associates, LTD, Developer
of Tract 21764, granted an Easement for Landscape Maintenance purposes to the Temecula
Community Services District referred to as Easement Note D of Tract 21764 in 1990 which was
recorded on July 27, 1990 as Document No. 278084 in the Official Records of the County or
Riverside ("Easement Deed").
WHEREAS, The Easement Deed includes the following language:
"If Grantee [City of Temecula Community Services District] or its governmental entity,
successors, or assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to maintain said Easement
Area, maintenance shall, after notice, become the responsibility of Grantor [Developer of Tract
21764], with all covenants and agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations
of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the Grantor [owners of underlying
property of Easement Area]."
WHEREAS, the Temecula Community Services District, through Service Level C, Zone
7; has provided landscape maintenance services for parcels located in Tract 21764 since 1990 but
the available funds generated by Service Level C, Zone 7, are not sufficient to maintain the
Easement Area.
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District does
hereby find, determine and declare that it is unable, incapable, and unwilling to maintain said
Easement Area pursuant to the Easement Deed.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula
does resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings in
support of this Resolution.
SECTION 2. Termination of Easement and Maintenance Responsibilities. The Board of
Directors hereby terminates the easement for landscape maintenance purposes described in the
Easement Deed and shall discontinue providing landscape maintenance services within the
Easement Area, upon written notice to the underlying property owners of the Easement Area.
SECTION 3. City Manager Authority. The City Manager is authorized to take all
actions necessary to implement the terms of this Resolution including, but not limited to, providing
required notice, recording applicable documents, approving implementing agreements, or
approving necessary certifications.
SECTION 3. CEQA Findings. The City Council hereby finds that in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines the adoption of this
Resolution is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) because the actions relate to
responsibility for maintenance of existing properties and do not alter the properties.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 26th day of May, 2020.
Zak Schwank, President
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of
Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2020- was duly and
regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the
City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 261h day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
3
Recorded at request of and return to:
Department of Building services 0V\
Real Property Management Division v
3133 Seventh Street
Riverside, CA 92507 I` p'�o
1411
FREE RECORDING �
U This instrument is for the benefit of w 5 7-11 `
the County of Riverside and is entitled
to be recorded without fee.kl
(Gout. Code 6103) JJJ
Parcel:
Project: Tract No. 21764, Warmington Homes
EASEMENT DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, WAWINGTON HOMES, a California corporation, and
GATE AY-MEADOWVIEW ASSOCIATES, LTD., a California limited
partnership (collectively "Grantor") hereby grant and convey to
the City of Temecula Community service District ("Grantee"),
together with the right to further grant or transfer the same to
others, perpetual drainage and flowage easements and rights -of -
way for maintaining, operating, altering, repairing, and
replacing equipment and landscaping over and within the bound-
aries of that certain real property located in the County of
Riverside, state of California, more particularly described as
follows (the "Easement Area"):
That certain Erainage and Flowage Easement depicted and
referred to as Easement Note D of Tract 21764, as per
map recorded in book 194 Pages 59 through 64 inclusive
of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of.
Riverside County, California.
If Grantee, or its governmental entity, successors, or
assigns, determines it is unable, incapable, or unwilling to
maintain said Easement Area, maintenance shall, after notice.,
become the responsibility of Grantor, with all covenants and
agreements of this easement extending to and becoming obligations
THIS DOCUMENT IS BEING RE -RECORDED TO INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF
ACCFPTANCE.
of all heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the
Grantor.
Dated: July 11, 1990 WARMINGTON HOMES,
a Calif rtia corporation
sy:
L
Its:
t
GATEWAY-MEADOWVIEW ASSOCIATES, LTD.,
a California limited partnership
BY:
GATEWAY -RANCHO I,
a California limited partnership
$y: Gateway Home Builders, Inc.
a California corporati n
Sy: { C'
A&� -
George tiro o �} P esident
ANDERSON-M.EADOWVIEW I,
a California limited partnership
By: Anderson Communities
a Californ a corporation
By:
David An rson, President
STATE OF CALO.ORNIA
SS.
COUNTY OF
On 7U before me, the undgrsigped, a tar Public
in an r sjid State, personally aooeared 711*-A
ersarially known me (or proved to me on the basi on sa i a ory
evid r_ce) t be per on who executed the within Instrument S the
of WARMINGTON HOMES, the corporation that
Tiecuted the Vithin instrument and acknowledged to me that said corporation
executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of
its board of directors.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OFFICIAL SEAL
MARY S!{AI UNSITY
/+�•! NOTARY PU4UC C1dIr01tNIA �
_osnNCE rUurrrr
My CammiSSlCn L�p3x► k,� 31. 1931
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed py the aeeu
dated July 11, 1990 from WAiA IMICN WMES and 6AT A-M�i](yiiVIEW 1�Sr�IAIZP GAT}.
to OOLWTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political corporation and.or goverrunental agency, is
hereby accepted by order of the Board of Supervisors on the date below and the
grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Date July 24, 1990
R 33' RT It-��ARNAU ��� -
2 %'S0,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
On this llth day of July , 19 90 ,
before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,
personally appeared George Szabo, Jr.
and—-------- —__
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be persons who executed the within instrument as
President and
Secretary, on behalf of Gateway Home St)ilders, Inc.
the corporation therein named and acknowledged to me that said
corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or
a resolution of its board of directors, said corporation being known
to me to be the general partner of Gateway -rancho I
the limited partnership that executed the within instrument as one of
the general partners of Gateway-Neadoiview Associates, Ltd.
the limited partnership that executed the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as the
general partner and that such limited partnership executed the same
as such partner, and that such limited partnership executed the same.
Signature ?it V i,l s?*x
Jeanette Stjcc
Name (Typed or Printed)u•�+inii::vz: .r�S'7
CORPORATION AS A GENERAL PARTNER OF A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AS A
PARTNER OF A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Satisfactory Evidence)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
}
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO }
3
On this llth day of July ' 19 90 ,
before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State,
personally appeared David Anderson
and-------------
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence) to be persons who executed the within instrument as
President and
Secretary, on behalf of Anderson Communities
the corporation therein named and a0,-.i—ledged to me that said
corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or
a resolution of its board of,directors, said corporation being known
to me to be the general partner of Anderson-Meadowview I
the limited partnership that executed the within instrument as one of
the general partners of Gateway-Meadowview Associates, Ltd.
the limited partnership that executdd the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as the
general partner and that such limited partnership executed the same
as such partner, and that such limited partnership executed the same.
Signature�� �..CV�
Jeanet a Stuck k.-... •r.;: �� h e�::'`r
Name (Typed or Printed
CORPORATION AS A GENERAL PARTNER OF A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AS A
PARTNER OF A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (Satisfactory Evidence)
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by
the within deed to the City of Temecula Community Service District,
a political corporation and/or governmental agency, is hereby
accepted by order of the Board of Directors on the date below and
the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly
authorized officer.
Date 916190
Plat-ricia H. Birdal , President
-- ' 30' WIDE SSMT. TO ��.
5 C. GAS CO PER d,-
OR. 2334-559
OF 1WIDE ESMT. T4
GAS
S.C. GAS CO PEop
R
r
�N r
24 } `-
.'
01
\
l
S\- I
i .g1i13!1�
EACrMFNr
- ARE A
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR OFFSITE DRAINACC
EASEMENT WILY OF
TRACT NO.20881
)NTAININC : 21) ACAES,MORC 02 LESS.
4 • � f
r
TABLE OF COURSES
1 S00.07.21'W 40.21' -
1 O SCO-07.21•V 103 13:
O�3 e . 509.2744- R-460.00: L- 73.20'
OS69.46'03'Y 34.67'
N71'39'SI1Y R 173.92• L•269.29'
10 t1 0 • 00
N44•t!'52* R-3S0.00' L-274.80'
12 0• 27.09'S7• R-250.DO: L•111.53-
}3 M64.3s'34'Y 6.60
14 N2S'24'26•E 7s.sa'
13 0 - 02'43'3S• R-617.00' L• 21.42-
le e- 19.12'22• R•450.00' L-150.14'
tT O+ 52'31'31' R-280.00: L•2S7.35'
11 S13'3i'00•E 126.54
115-76,
20 1f e • 520'34'23 E R•280.00' L-100.54'
21 M7S'40'35•E 70.06'
22 O N73't3'00'E 31.73'
23 N53'31.00'E 61.95'
24 N52.23'00'E 49.DT'
25 N56 00 001E 24.0T'
26 N30'2S'41•E 101.50'
2T N75.40•33'E 44.12'
21 813'10'3S•[ 2s.94•
O2f M20'35'27.v 112.11' 'RADIAL`
30 0 • OS•13'41• R•4SS.00' L• 4S.s0'
31 0• 21.10'32- R-4SS.00' L•223.79•
EXHIBIT "A-3"
Page 1 of 1
�L�
- - - --ZD'WICE ESMT TO){Z \ -
0OG GAS CO. PER C4 ti
.R. 2334 - 554
OF 16WIDE ESMT. TQ JV� �1411Q� '�Y • ''
S-C. GASAS CO PER
D.R.1090-429lp
�r L
Jr
33• 26 " /J
y ,
N t31 rja F�
ff
O
c
L.0
_fJ1
1,
i�ASrME 7qt
0
SHETCH TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR OFFSITE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT W'LY OF
TRACT NO.Z089f
CONTAINING : 2.I1 ACRES,MORL OR LESS•
in
I
e 1
o�
31 Q
'
4<'
�'y O
� J
r Z
/
TABLE
OF COURSES
c'1
SOO'07'21'11
900'07'21'Y
40.91'
105.03'
S35'02'45•V
85.82'
O6
OS 0+
09'27'14'
S69.46.05'Y
R+460.00'
34.67,
L+ 75,20'
O
G+
R•175:92
L+269.20'
O9
R79'33'S1•Y
l0
R44'S{'S3•v
II G •
O
1+330.00'
L•274.89'
12
e +
27'01'57'
R+2SO.D0'
L+11{.53'
14
13
R64.35'34'EY
1
16
IS o•
02'43'SSR•617.00'
L• 29.42'
1{
17 0-
52'39'39•
563'3{'00E
R+280.00:
126.54
L•2S7.351
20
1{
a.
563.45'00'E
20.34'25•
115.78'
R+280.00'
L+100.54'
22
21
N75140135'E
N73'13.00•E
70.06,
31,73'
24
23
N33.36'00'E
61.25,
26
25
N36'00100'E
N3O'25'4{'E
24.07'
109.50'
20T
1473•40'35•E
44.1Z'
2!
N7S'40'7S•E
2S.{4'
r1
30
\J n •
OS°43.4{'
R•457.00'
L• 45.50'
JI 0 •
28.10.52•
R+43 .00'
L+223.79'
EXHIBIT "A-3"
-I Page 1 of J-
T''
248649
CONTINUATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR EASEMENT AREA TRACT NO. 20735-9
thence along said curve westerly 40.27 feet through a central angle of
76°55'00";
thence tangent from said curve North 84000100" West 36.94 feet to the
southwesterly line of said Lot 54.
thence continuing North 84000'00' West 72.56 feet;
thence South 87150'00" West 38.50 feet to the beginmtng of a tangent curve
concave northeasterly and having a radius of 15.00 recta;
thence northwesterly along said curve 22.01 feet through a central angle of
84.05'00%
thence tangent from said curve North 8"1)5'00" West 54.90 feet to an angle point
in the northerly line of said Lot 55;
thence North 2S'34'00' West 6.00 feet;
.,,nce South 239001481 best 25.14 feet to a point on a non -tangent curve
concentric with and 4.00 feet westerly from a curve in the southwesterly line o;
said lot, said concentric curse being concave southwesterly and having a radius
of 326.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
South 71'35135' West;
thence along said curve southerly 52.41 feet through a central angle of
9°12'39';
thence non -tangent from said curve South 50°18" 2" East 24,98 feet to a point on
a non -tangent curve concentric with and 5.00 feet Southerly from a curve in the
southerly line of said Lat 55, said concentric curve being concave southerly and
having a radius of 328.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point
bears South 1°24'38' East;
thence along said curve easterly 92.32 feet through a central angle of
16°07'38';
thence tangent from said curve South 75°17'00" East 81.44 feet;
thence North 61029'S5' East 39.72 feet to a point on a curve concentric with and
6.00 feet southeasterly from a curve in the southeasterly line of said Lot 54,
said concentric curve tieing concave southeasterly and having a radius of 888.00
ff a radial line of said curve from said paint bears South 71*431101 East;
thence along said curve northeasterly 192.93 feet through a central angle of
12.261551 to a line bearing South 59"16'16" East from the POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence North 59016'16" West 6.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 0.31 Acres, more or less.
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 6 of 8 `}1
2-ISG49
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
OFFSITE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
That certain parcel of land situated in the unincorporated territory of the
County of Riverside, State of California, being that portion of Lot 543 of Tract
No. 3883 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 63, Pages 1 through 35 of Maps
in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as
follows:
COMMENCING at the intersection of the westerly line of Tract No. 20881 with the
centerline of Calle Pina Colada (Lot "A") as shown on a map of said tract filed
in Book 180. Pages 42 through 47 of Maps in said Office of the Riverside County
Recorder; thence along said westerly line South 0°07'21" West 146.74 feet;
thence South 48036'30" West 30.87 feet; thence South 35'02'45" West 85.12 feet
to a point on a non -tangent curve concave northerly and having a radius of
4r^ 00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
N, �h 40°05'17" West; thence along said curve westerly 75.90 feet through a
central angle of 9°27'14 thence non -tangent from said curve
South 69148'05" West 34.67 feet to a point on a non -tangent curve concave
northerly and having a radius of 455.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from
said point bears North 26°20'13" West; thence along said curve westerly 45.50
feet through a central angle of 5°43'46" to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence
continuing along said curve westerly 223.79 feet through a central angle of
28°10'52"; thence non -tangent from said curve North 89059'44" West 75.92 feet;
thence North 79033'51" West 100.12 feet; thence North 75"48'33" West 86.78 feet
to a point on a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of
350.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
North 7°34'25" East; thence along said curve northwesterly 274.89 feet through a
central angle of 44°59'58" to a point of reverse curvature with a curve concave
southwesterly and having a radius of 250.00 Feet, a radial line of said curve
from said point bears South 52034'23" West; thence along said curve
northwesterly 118.53 feet through a central angle of 27009'57"; thence tangent
from said curve North 64°35'34" West 6.80 feet to the southeasterly line of Del
Rey Road (66.00 feet wide) as shown on said map of Tract No. 3883; thence along
said southeasterly line North 25°24'26" East 75.58 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve in said southeasterly line concave southeasterly and having a
radius of 617.00 feet; thence along said curve and southeasterly line
northeasterly 29.42 feet through a central angle of 2"43'55" to a point on a
non -tangent curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 450.00 feet, a
rz it line of said curve from said point bears South 27°59'11" West; thence
along said curve southeasterly 150.84 feet through a central angle of 19°12'22"
to a point on a non -tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of
280.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears
North 53°47'50" East; thence along said curve southeasterly 257.35 feet through
a cental angle of 52"39'39"; thence non -tangent from said curve
South 83°38'00" East 126.54 feet; thence South 83"45'00" East 115.76 feet to the
beginning of a tangent curve concave northerly and having a radius of 280.00
feet; thence along said curve easterly 100.54 feet through a central angle of
20'34'25"; thence tangent from said curve North 75°40'35" East 44.12 feet to a
point bearing North 20'36'27" West 112.19 feet from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence South 20"36'27" East 112.19 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 2.13 Acres, more or less.
SUPIECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights -of -Way and Easements of Record.
EXHIBIT "A"
Page 8 of 8 �'
rr
{= F RvAs
�Q
2073E a �'
Il.
EXHIBIT "A-1"
Page 1. of 1
2486,19
pC�z 1
7''Q ci
73S 9. I
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT TRACT NOS-ZO73S-7,B,9.
4��
2486-19
zoo' of zoo'
SCALE IN FS;T
.544�
l
110, 80,
2
I
NOSCAPE MAINiERANCE EASEMENT.
TRACT NO. 20851
r = EAWMtWT APUA
EXHIBIT "A-2"
Page 1 of 1
Alk
ART
C �
Mp�ry y�ry
MO o
30642 N
3�521
SqN PggQVgL RO
Zone 7 - Ridgeview
�CPM,N
DES REY Floo^ry$� L
a1294 9
41308 41295 ('
41311 41305 41304
41320
41321 U) C 41318 41315 41314 9
a r 41321 D 41328 41325 U
wo 41333 —I 41334 41324
n W
41339 41338 0 41334
^' 41343 < 41342 41337 Q 7
41348 X 41344 G
CALLE PINA COLADA n 4735j 41347 m
-i 47358 41 47354
w 30859 0 365
0 R,95
J v MOO 000 O MO
w' m o MO MOOo rn m 309sp
30850 M o o M o 0 oMm p
M M O 00 M M MO MOOy. 5g °j%K
M 00 ^O Mpg of M o�
30851 WHITE MO �� 41399 7 Mpp�o
30787 0 o ro R°) 11110 S 4p3
o`b 4j40
30852 8s? 308>ppm�ry M 9p �gN'`, �i�J Aio 4j40 /
.�, � ggry 3pg2
30835
�rym gRrt, 'w � o
eb 41pg0 41452 J� ^o
a � 6
41456 41462 4145
r
41466 41412 D
4146 (n
2rn
a 41416 Cz g146 4147 A
v ` 41492 M
41488 41486 Z
41487 41496 0
� g1502 41496 D
�3 41512
41499 41508 o G 41506
2 41517 41522 4151
F- 41516 41525 0 41532
41529 C) 4153
Z 41528 41549 41542 S47
41535 4
41536 41 41
41547 LU 5>3 552 4155
LU 41548
41559 Y 47582 47564
41567 ZZ 41556 `�' 4jS�2 U 41,5
41513 p1y16 4jS92 2 �T 47588
g1565 �5$6 4j8p2 ��
w0s°0 G` o^hp 6p6 S l
3p660 \ R- b^ 41
9 090
4 �QCgRrT n ��PO�( s0s0'7 47s23 47R�
1163S 478 2
o � 9 47s4j 4782
47'
7 s`s9 47B3 Q
4,
41683 9 °
/s Z
� 7S
'S
cFb
F�
kFgR�rRo
Legend
Zone 7 Slope Area - 135,014 sqft
Service Level C - Zone 7
Parcels
0 200 400 Feet
The map ServiceLevelC_Ltr_7.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update
Al and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this
map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at hftps://temeculaca.gov/gis Updated 3/26/2019
Item No. 16
ACTION MINUTES
JOINT SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
APRIL 28, 2020
CALL TO ORDER at 7:48 PM: Chair James Stewart
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
SARDA/COUNCIL PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
SARDA/COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Schwank. The vote
reflected unanimous approval.
12. Approve Sixth Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement for the Town
Square Marketplace Development Between the Successor Agency to the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency, the City of Temecula, and Town Square Marketplace Old Town,
LLC Located at APNs. 922-360-004, 005, 006, 007)
Recommendation: 1. That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO
THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY
AND AMONG THE CITY OF TEMECULA, SUCCESSOR
AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
AND TOWN SQUARE MARKETPLACE OLD TOWN, LLC
CONVEYING APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE OF PROPERTY
LOCATED ON MAIN STREET WEST OF MERCEDES STREET
2. That the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment
Agency adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. SARDA 2020-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE SIXTH
AMENDMENT TO THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND TOWN SQUARE
MARKETPLACE OLD TOWN, LLC CONVEYING
APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE OF PROPERTY LOCATED
ON MAIN STREET WEST OF MERCEDES STREET
SARDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
SARDA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
SARDA ADJOURNMENT
At 7:50 PM, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally
adjourned to Tuesday, May 12, 2020, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session
commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
James Stewart, Chair
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Item No. 17
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve an Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to Allow Four -Story Hotels
Within the Downtown Core District and to Add Language to the Specific Plan to
Clarify the Intended Use of a Minor Exception for Building Height
PREPARED BY: Stuart Fisk, Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE OLD
TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 2009071049)
RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO THE OLD
TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO.
LR20-0209)
BACKGROUND: On May 25, 2010, City Council adopted Ordinance 10-09 to approve a
comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. This Specific Plan Amendment
utilized form -based zoning to establish standards for building placement, building form, and
building type to facilitate pedestrian friendly development, and emphasized implementation of
these standards over specific land uses.
The 2010 Specific Plan Amendment allows four-story buildings when at least one floor of
residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided. The purpose
for allowing four stories when at least one floor of residential is provided was to encourage
residential uses within the Downtown Core district, with the intent that the residents would help
to support the commercial businesses within Old Town. The allowance for four-story buildings
when one floor of office (with parking) is provided was made based on community input provided
during the visioning and Specific Plan development process, with the goal of providing additional
options and flexibility for development within Old Town.
The 2010 Specific Plan Program EIR analyzed development of Old Town based on a mixture of
commercial, hotel, residential, civic, and office uses. Based on market absorption projections
developed by Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) for the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment, the
Program EIR assumed an additional 499 hotel rooms (beyond the hotel rooms existing in Old
Town at that time). The 2010 Specific Plan Amendment allows three-story hotels throughout the
Downtown Core district and allows up to eight stories within the Downtown Core -Hotel Overlay
district when a full service hotel with conference facilities, restaurant and other guest services is
provided.
In addition to the four-story buildings currently permitted in the Downtown Core district (for
buildings that provide at least one floor of residential, or at least one floor of office with parking),
the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would also allow four-story hotels in the Downtown Core
district.
Since the adoption of the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment, staff has heard from multiple hotel
developers that the ability to construct four-story hotels in the Downtown Core is necessary for
new hotels to be economically feasible. Staff has reached out to KMA, who prepared the market
study that guided development of the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment, and received information
validating assertions relating to the economic feasibility of three story versus four story hotels in
the Downtown Core. It should also be noted that no three-story hotels have been built in the
Downtown Core district since the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment was adopted. Furthermore,
while residents living in Old Town may help support the businesses located in Old Town by
occasionally shopping or dining in Old Town, it is likely that the construction of hotel rooms in
Old Town would provide even greater support to Old Town's businesses anticipating that the hotel
patrons would frequently shop and dine in Old Town.
To allow four-story hotels in the Downtown Core district, the proposed Old Town Specific Plan
Amendment would modify the requirements in the Specific Plan for multi -story buildings within
the Downtown Core district. Of the 499 additional hotel rooms analyzed for the 2010 Old Town
Specific Plan Amendment, 343 hotel rooms have already either been constructed or approved,
leaving a balance of 156 hotel rooms analyzed in the 2010 Program EIR. Projects that exceed 499
total hotel rooms will be required to prepare additional CEQA documentation.
In addition, to clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height, the proposed Old
Town Specific Plan Amendment would add footnotes to Table IV-8 (Allowable Building Types
and Height in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District), Table IV-17
(Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the Residential/Limited Mixed -Use District),
and Table IV-28 (Allowable Building Types and Building Heights in the Neighborhood
Residential District) of the Specific Plan to state that "Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula
Municipal Code, which provides criteria for Minor Exceptions to development regulations, may
be utilized for building height in Old Town for the purpose of providing architectural elements to
a portion (or portions) of a building to add roofline variation or to otherwise enhance the aesthetics
of the building consistent with its architectural style. A Minor Exception is not intended to be
utilized to add overall height to the base roof line of the building nor to add extra floor to ceiling
height of any one or more stories."
ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the proposed Specific Plan amendment will not have a significant impact upon the environment
based on a completed EIR Addendum. As a result, the City Council will take action on a
recommendation to adopt an EIR Addendum in compliance with CEQA Section 15164.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Aerial Map
2. City Council Resolution — EIR Addendum
Exhibit A — EIR Addendum
3. City Council Resolution — Specific Plan Amendment
Exhibit A — Specific Plan Amendment (Underline/Strikeout)
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-11
5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-12
6. Planning Commission Staff Report of May 6, 2020
7. Notice of Public Hearing
8. Draft Notice of Determination with County Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA LRzo-azos
1 inch = 500 feet 1:6,000
0 200 400 800 Feet
I C
Al (
Date Created: 04/16/2020 The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
The map LR20-0209.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update
and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this
map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at hftps:/ttemeculaca.gov/gis
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO.
2009071049)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. In May 2010, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a comprehensive
amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). At that time, the City certified a
Final Program Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2009071049 ("EIR"), to
comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") for approval
of the Specific Plan Amendment.
B. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment
No. 9 to the Specific Plan would update and modify those standards including an update to allow
four-story hotels within the Downtown Core district and to add language to the Specific Plan to
clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height.
C. Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental
Impact Report, City of Temecula, California, State Clearinghouse No. 97121030 ("Addendum No.
1") addresses potential environmental impacts that might result from the Specific Plan
Amendment.
D. The City has caused an Addendum No. 1 ("Addendum") to be prepared for the
Specific Plan Amendment in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines because the
Specific Plan Amendment does not require the preparation of a new or supplemental
environmental impact report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164.
E. An addendum need not be circulated for public review but is attached to a final EIR
in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15164.
F. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Addendum No. 1 in conjunction
with the Program EIR.
G. On May 6, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No.l to the Old Town Specific Plan Final
Program Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific
Plan (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address
the Planning Commission.
H. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly
considering the comments received, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-11
recommending to the City Council that Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Final Program
Environmental Impact Report be approved. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution
No. 2020-12 recommending to the City Council that the proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old
Town Specific Plan (SP-5) be approved.
I. On May 26, 2020 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on the proposed Addendum No.l to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program
Environmental Impact Report and the proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan
(SP-5) at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the
City Council.
J. The City Council has reviewed the findings made in this Resolution and finds that
they are based upon substantial evidence that has been presented to the City Council in the record
of proceedings. The documents, staff reports, and other materials that constitute the record of
proceedings on which this Resolution is based are on file and available for public examination on
the City's website at TemeculaCA.gov. The City Council has independently reviewed and
considered the contents of Addendum No. 1 prior to deciding whether to approve the Specific Plan
Amendment.
Section 2. Further Findings. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the
City Council finds and determines that Addendum No. 1 is the appropriate environmental
document to analyze the proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Specific Plan ("Amendment")
because:
A. Some changes or additions to the Program EIR are necessary, but none of the
conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a
subsequent EIR have occurred.
B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the Amendment that will require
major revisions of the previous Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects;
C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under
which the Amendment are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous Program
EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous
Program EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the Amendment will have one or more significant
effects not discussed in the Program EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that
will be substantially more severe than shown in the Program EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures
or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially
N
reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different
from those analyzed in the Program EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects
on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts Addendum No. 1 which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26th day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Program Environmental Impact Report Addendum
Old Town Specific Plan
Amendment No. 9
Downtown Core District Hotel Development Standards
State Clearinghouse No. 2009071049
Prepared by:
City of Temecula
Community Development Department
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
(951) 694-6400
Aft
Of
,-unirnunity ❑evelopment
Department
April 2020
Overview
This Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) Addendum has been prepared for the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP)
Amendment No. 9 — Downtown Core District Hotel Development Standards project. It is an Addendum to the 2010
Program EIR that was prepared and certified for the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 7, and which is now final.
An Initial Study Checklist and environmental analysis has been prepared to determine if any additional environmental
impacts will result from the OTSP Specific Plan Amendment (No. 9), in comparison to the impacts identified in the
certified and final 2010 PEIR. All environmental factors and checklist questions are evaluated and documented into one
of the following conclusions:
• Increased impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified PEIR
• Same impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified PEIR
• Reduced impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified PEIR
As documented in the attached Initial Study checklist, the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 does not result in
any new or increased impacts as compared to the analysis in the previously certified 2010 PEIR. As such, an EIR
Addendum is the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document for Specific Plan Amendment No.
City of Temecula
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Initial Study / Environmental Checklist
Project Title
Old Town Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 9 - Downtown Core District
Hotel Development Standards Project
OTSP originally adopted on February 22, 1994 (Ordinance No. 94-05)
Previous Adopted Specific Plan Amendments (SPA):
SPA 1 - January 23, 1996 (Ordinance No. 96-01)
SPA 2 - May 13, 1997 (Ordinance No. 97-06)
SPA 3 - July 13, 1999 (Ordinance No. 99-12)
SPA 4 - October 10, 2000 (Ordinance No. 00-11)
SPA 5 - August 24, 2004 (Ordinance No. 04-08)
SPA 6 - June 13, 2006 (Ordinance No. 06-07)
SPA 7 - May 25, 2010 (Ordinance No. 10-09)
SPA 8 - September 5, 2017 (Resolution No.17-56)
Previous CEQA Document State
SCH# 2009071049 — Old Town Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 7 Program
Clearinghouse Number
EIR —Certified February 2010
Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Temecula
Community Development Department
41000 Main Street
Temecula CA 92590
Contact Person and Phone Number
Stuart Fisk, Principal Planner
(951) 506-5159
Project Location/History
Project Location
The Project area is located in the southwest portion of the City of Temecula,
which is located within the County of Riverside approximately 85 miles
southeast of Los Angeles, 60 miles northeast of San Diego, and 25 miles inland
from the Pacific Ocean (Figure 1). The Project site is located within the Old Town
area of the City of Temecula, west of Interstate 15 (1-15), south of Rancho
California Road, east of Pujol Street and generally north of First Street/Santiago
Road (Figure 2). The overall OTSP and the Downtown Core Zoning District and
Downtown Core Hotel Overlay zone is shown in Figure 3.
Project History
Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989. On November 9, 1993,
Temecula adopted the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. Since then,
14 specific plans have been adopted to govern defined geographic regions of
the City. The Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) was prepared in 1992 and 1993
under the direction of a City Council -appointed steering committee. The
Steering Committee members represented a wide range of local business and
resident interests. The OTSP was adopted by the City Council on February 8,
1994. The original purpose of the document was to provide a comprehensive
plan for land use, development regulations, design guidelines, vehicular
circulation, parking, development incentives and other related actions aimed at
implementing the goals and objectives set forth in the document itself.
The Specific Plan for Old Town was adopted on February 22, 1994. Between
1994 and 2006, six amendments were made to the Specific Plan, primarily
with regard to building height standards, requirements for outdoor vendors,
sign regulations, land uses, parking standards, historic preservation zoning
and standards, and setback and landscape standards. On May 25, 2010, the
City Council adopted the seventh amendment to the OTSP, which was a
comprehensive revision to the entire Old Town Specific Plan, and a Program
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified. The eighth
amendment to the OTSP relocated a portion of the Downtown Core Hotel
Overlay zone.
The OTSP Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 7 was adopted May 25, 2010
and a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified
(May 11, 2010).
The primary purpose of the OTSP SPA No. 7 was to incorporate form -based
code principles into the Specific Plan to more clearly define development
regulations, to better facilitate pedestrian friendly development through
building placement and streetscapes, and to encourage mixed -use
development within Old Town. The Specific Plan Amendment was intended to
achieve these goals through changes to site planning standards and guidelines,
streetscape standards and guidelines, land use district locations and titles,
architectural standards and guidelines, parking lot guidelines, public art
guidelines, paving material guidelines, outdoor dining/sidewalk furniture
guidelines, sign regulations and guidelines, alley guidelines, and landscape
guidelines within the Specific Plan. SPA No. 7 also resulted in the annexation of
approximately 2.4 acres into the Specific Plan at a location south of First
Street, along the west side of Old Town Front Street, and the removal of
approximately 2.3 acres from the Specific Plan at a location west of the
intersection of 6th Street and Pujol Street.
The proposed project site has also been evaluated in previous planning
documents including:
• Old Town Specific Plan, Originally Adopted February 22, 1994 (Revised
January 23, 1996, May 13, 1997, July 13, 1999, October 10, 2000, August
24, 2004, June 13, 2006, May 25, 2010, and September 5, 2017).
• City of Temecula General Plan EIR, prepared by The Planning Center,
updated 2005.
• Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2O09072049) — Old Town
Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment 7 (Certified May 11, 2010)
• Old Town Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment 7 —Adopted May 25,
2010
• Truax Hotel/Hotel Overlay Zone Boundary Modification EIR (SCH
2017011029), adopted September 2017
2010 Program EIR Summary
The Program EIR evaluated the effect of SPA No. 7 on the following environmental
factors: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Global Warming/Climate Change, Cultural
Resources, Hydrology, Land Use & Planning, Noise, Utilities and Public Services
and Traffic and Transportation. Project related temporary impacts to air quality,
global warming/climate change and noise were determined to be significant and
unavoidable, with the remaining issue areas (Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, Land
Use and Planning, Utilities and Public Services and Traffic and Transportation)
determined to be less than significant.
A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the significant and
unavoidable impacts. The Program EIR and findings are available for review at
the City of Temecula.
The Program EIR evaluated impacts associated with the following OTSP SPA 7
project description:
• Commercial: 1,043,928 Square Feet
• Hotel: 499 Rooms
• Residential (MF): 2,377 Units
• Residential (SF): 31 Units
• Civic: 159,809 Square Feet
• Office: 835,494 Square Feet
The Program EIR project description included the following discussion of the
Downtown Core District:
Downtown Core District
The Downtown Core District located along the east edge of the Open Space
corridor, which contains Murrieta Creek, is intended to provide for uses that
will support pedestrian -oriented and mixed -use development. This district is
defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four stories that are intended
to accommodate art galleries, museums, restaurants and small-scale
boutique retailers such as gift, specialty food, and antique shops, or similar
retail uses, offices and service -oriented uses. Residential uses are permitted
in the Downtown Core, but residential and office uses are restricted to the
second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main
Street. All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core must contain at least
one floor restricted to residential use or office use (with parking).
Cumulative projects included in the Program EIR impact evaluation included
the Springhill Suites and Crown Plaza hotel projects
3
Project Sponsor's Name and Address I City of Temecula
Community Development Department
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
General Plan Designation Specific Plan Implementation - Old Town Specific Plan (SP 5) — Downtown Core
District
Zoning
SP-5
Description of Project Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 9 is proposed
to modify the requirements in the Specific Plan for multi -story buildings within
the Downtown Core Zoning District to allow four story hotels. Currently, the
existing Specific Plan (Section IV.B.2.a) requires four story buildings to provide
at least one floor of residential or one floor of office use with parking. The
Downtown Core Hotel Overlay Zone, located within the Downtown Core zoning
designation, does not require residential or office to be included in hotels. The
existing OTSP allows for up to 499 Hotel Rooms within the Downtown Core and
Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts, based on a market study that
supported the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment and Program EIR. Of those 499
allowable hotel rooms, 343 hotel rooms have already either been constructed
or approved, leaving a balance of 156 hotel rooms analyzed in the 2010 Program
EIR. Projects that exceed 499 total hotel rooms will be required to prepare
additional CEQA documentation.
SPA No. 9 also proposes to add footnotes to Table IV-8 (Allowable Building Types
and Height in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District),
Table IV-17 (Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the
Residential/Limited Mixed -Use District), and Table IV-28 (Allowable Building
Types and Building Heights in the Neighborhood Residential District) of the
Specific Plan to state that "Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code,
which provides criteria for Minor Exceptions to development regulations, may
be utilized for building height in Old Town for the purpose of providing
architectural elements to a portion (or portions) of a building to add roofline
variation or to otherwise enhance the aesthetics of the building consistent with
its architectural style analysis. A Minor Exception is not intended to be utilized
to add overall height to the base roof line of the building or to add extra floor to
ceiling height of any one or more stories." Because the Minor Exception is
already available for development in Old Town and the footnote proposed
above is intended to clarify the intended use of the Minor Exception and will not
allow for anything different or greater than what is currently allowed, no further
discussion of this proposed addition to the Specific Plan will occur in this
Addendum.
Section IV.B.2.a in the Specific Plan (Land Use and Urban Development
Standards/Old Town Zoning Districts/Downtown Core (DTC) currently reads as
follows:
4
"The Downtown Core district is intended to provide for uses that support
pedestrian oriented and mixed -use development. The Downtown Core Zoning
district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four stories when at
least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office
(with parking) is provided). The Downtown Core is intended to accommodate a
variety of land uses that will create a vibrant public realm. Uses include, but are
not limited to art galleries, museums, restaurants, entertainment -oriented uses,
small scale boutique retailers such as gift, specialty food, and antique shops and
similar retail uses, offices and service -oriented uses. Residential development
at 40 to 70 dwelling units per acre and mixed -use developments are also
anticipated within this district. Service and office uses are restricted to the
second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main
Street. Residential uses are permitted in the Downtown Core Zoning district, but
are also restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town
Front Street and Main Street. All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core
district must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use or one floor
of office with on -site parking."
The proposed language for Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would revise Section
IV.B. 2.a (Old Town Zoning Districts / Downtown Core (DTC) to read as follows:
The Downtown Core district is intended to provide for uses that support
pedestrian oriented and mixed -use development. The Downtown Core Zoning
district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at
least one floor of residential is provided; when at least one floor of office (with
parking) is provided, or when four floors of hotel are provided). The Downtown
Core is intended to accommodate a variety of land uses that will create a vibrant
public realm. Uses include, but are not limited to art galleries, museums,
restaurants, entertainment -oriented uses, small scale boutique retailers such as
gift, specialtyfood, and antique shops and similar retail uses, offices and service -
oriented uses. Residential development at 40 to 70 dwelling units per acre and
mixed -use developments are also anticipated within this district. Service uses
identified in Table IV-1 and office uses are restricted to the second floor and
higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. Residential uses
are permitted in the Downtown Core Zoning district, but are also restricted to
the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main
Street. All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core district must contain at
least one floor restricted to residential use, one floor of office with onsite
parking; or four stories of hotel uses."
The footnote (P4) in Table IV-1 (Land Use Matrix) for hotel uses in the
Downtown Core/Downtown Core -Hotel Overlay District will reference the
above revised language.
The above amended OTSP Downtown Core District text still allows for a
maximum of 499 hotel rooms within the Downtown Core and
Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts. This EIR Addendum will focus the
environmental analysis on any changes in environmental impacts that would
result from allowing four story hotels in addition to the Downtown Core Zoning
District's current allowance for 4-story buildings if one floor of residential or
office (with parking) is provided in multi -story buildings. Four story hotel
buildings may result in additional or fewer actual hotel projects, although the
number of hotel rooms will not change from 499 as a result of the proposed
Specific Plan Amendment.
No specific hotel projects are proposed as part of this Specific Plan Amendment.
Additional CEQA documentation will be required for future hotel project
applications in the OTSP if they exceed the 499 total hotel rooms analyzed in
the 2010 Program EIR for the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -
Use Districts.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
The following describes each land use surrounding the Project Site:
• North — The Specific Plan Area is bordered immediately to the north by
Rancho California Road, which provides direct access to Interstate 15 (1-
15), central Temecula and the unincorporated De Luz area. Commercial
and Business Park land uses are located north of the Specific Plan area.
• West — The Specific Plan area is bordered immediately to the west by the
escarpment hillside and the Altair Specific Plan.
• South — The Project Site is generally bordered to the south by First
Street/Santiago Road. The area south of First Street includes commercial
and open space land uses.
• East —The Project Site is bordered immediately to the east by Interstate 15
(I-15).
Public Agencies Whose Approval is
The Project is anticipated to require the following review and approvals:
Required
Agency
Action
City of Temecula
. Approval of Old Town Specific Plan
Amendment No. 9
• Adoption of EIR Addendum
Appendix A: Traffic Memo
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
This Initial Study Checklist has been prepared to determine if any additional environmental impacts will result with
adoption of the OTSP Specific Plan Amendment (No. 9) in comparison to the impacts identified in the 2010 Certified
Program EIR. All environmental factors and checklist questions are evaluated and documented into one of the following
conclusions:
• Increased impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified Program EIR
• Same impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified Program EIR
• Reduced impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified Program EIR
It is noted that the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Initial Study Checklist was updated in 2019 to modify some of the
checklist questions and add additional checklist topical areas. The Initial Study checklist used to scope the content of
the 2010 Program EIR was the pre-2019 version and does not entirely match the 2019 updated checklist used in this
Addendum. Checklist questions contained in the previous checklist that are not included in the 2019 update, are not
evaluated herein. Only those environmental factors evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR are reevaluated in this EIR
Addendum checklist, with the exception of Tribal Cultural Resources, which was added to the Initial Study Checklist in
2019. Environmental factors not previously evaluated (except Tribal Cultural Resources) in the 2010 Program EIR are
not evaluated herein to ensure consistency between the Program EIR and the EIR Addendum. Specific Plan Amendment
9 proposes to amend hotel -related land use policy within the Downtown Core District. No specific development
proposals or locations have been proposed, and future development applications will be subject to further CEQA
environmental review at the time that they are submitted.
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact
that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Mineral Resources
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Noise
Air Quality
Population/Housing
Biological Resources
Public Services
Cultural Resources
Recreation
Energy
Transportation
Geology/Soils
Tribal Cultural Resources
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Utilities/Service Systems
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Wildfire
Hydrology/Water Quality
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Land Use/Planning
• Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Noise were found to be significant and unavoidable in the 2010
OTSP SPA No. 7 Program EIR. They remain so, within the context of the EIR Addendum, but no increases in
these impacts occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9.
Determination
(To be completed by the lead agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project
proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless
mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
X
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier INITIAL STUDY, NEGATIVE
DECLARATION or ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) project impacts
have been determined to be the same or less than identified in the earlier INITIAL STUDY, NEGATIVE
DECLARATION or ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM will be
prepared and, nothing further is required.
Signature
Date
of Temecula
Printed Name For
Lake Skinner
Mu iet
a
i
\ r
J
Temecula
C
Project Location
Riverside County -----------_ ------------ ---------------
San Diego County
CLEVELAND
NATIONAL
FOREST
0 1 2
MILES
19010199.01 GRX 001 1
Source: adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2020
9
1 n,
�`
�` dy
!r
R f" VIA,,
%, d W�-44
Legend
Civic (CV)
Neighborhood Residential (NR)
Downtown Core (DTC)
® Downtown Core — Hotel Overlay (DTC1HO)
JW Open Space (OS)
Residential 1 Limited Mixed Use (RILMU)
0 250 500
FEET
4.
19010199.01 GRX D02
Source: adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2020
V
11
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Documented in
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
X
b
Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to,
X
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic
highway?
c
In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual
X
character or quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized
area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
d
Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
X
adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area?
Comments:
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan, and
evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to
four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is
provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the
Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, aesthetic impacts associated with the 499
hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
1.a. Same Impact. Scenic vistas are views defined as having a valued resource and typically contain scenes such as
waterways, the ocean, hills, valleys, or mountains. The City of Temecula contains several scenic vistas which include the
hills surrounding the City of Temecula and Santa Ana Mountains to the west and southern ridgelines, the Santa Margarita
River, the slopes in the Sphere of Influence located west and east of the City limits and other important landforms and
historic landscape features as scenic vistas. The rolling hills surrounding the City of Temecula to the south east, and west
are designated by the General Plan Community Design Element as important natural features whose public views should
be protected and maintained. Therefore, all public and private development projects are subject to review by the City to
ensure consistency with the General Plan Community Design Element to maintain public views of scenic resources.
A portion of the 1-15 from Corona South to the San Diego County line has been named as an Eligible State Scenic Highway.
At this time, this area of the 1-15 has been designated but is not yet considered a State Scenic Highway (Caltrans, 2016).
The Project area is highly urbanized and exhibits relatively flat terrain. Views of the surrounding area, specifically of the
Santa Ana Mountains, would not be substantially obstructed or impacted by Project implementation due to the similar
elevation of the Project area compared to the surrounding land uses. Furthermore, the Project is required to comply with
the General Plan Community Design Element and is subject to review by the City for consistency. Therefore, development
within the Project area would result in less than significant impacts related to scenic vistas and the effects would be less
than significant.
12
1.b. Same Impact. The Project Site, nearby roadways, and surrounding land are not considered a state scenic highway
corridor. Within Riverside County the closest designated State Scenic Highways in Riverside County are along State Route
74 (SR-74) and State Route 243 (SR-243). The area designated as a State Scenic Highway is not visible from the Project Site
or the surrounding area and is located approximately 50 miles northeast of the Project Site. The Project is located adjacent
to the 1-15, which is designated by Caltrans as an Eligible State Scenic Highway; however, it is not officially designated as
a State Scenic Highway by Caltrans. Public views of the distant mountains (Cleveland National Forest) to the south from I-
15 would not be obscured by development of the Project. Under the Project, public views of the project area would change
from a vacant land to a built environment with multiple story buildings. However, the proposed Project is consistent with
surrounding residential and commercial uses. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts would occur to
passenger views along the 1-15 and impacts would be less than significant.
1.c. Same Impact. The Project area is currently developed with urban uses. The Project would modify the existing visual
character and quality of the area through the addition of up to four (4) story hotels; however, the proposed hotel uses are
located with an urban area and are consistent and visually compatible with the uses located in the vicinity of the project
area. Additionally, four story buildings are a Permitted Use in the OTSP Downtown Core District (when at least one floor
of residential or one floor of office (with parking) is provided) and are consistent with the City of Temecula Zoning
Ordinance. Because the visual character would be similar to the surrounding land uses and is a permitted use under the
OTSP and current zoning, the Project is consistent with surrounding land uses and would have a less than significant
impact on the visual character of the area.
1.d. Same Impact. The Project Site is located within a developed and urban area within the City of Temecula. New sources
of exterior lighting and interior lighting would be included as part of the Project and be subject to light pollution regulations
in Chapter 17.22 Section 17.22.176 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code, the County of Riverside's Mount Palomar Light
Pollution Ordinance, and the City of Temecula General Plan Policy 2.5 of the Community Design Elements. Lighting would
be downward shielded and dark sky compliant to minimize lighting and glare.
Daytime glare is attributed to the reflection of artificial and natural lighting off of highly reflective surfaces, such as
windows. Mid -rise buildings with large surface areas of reflective or mirrorlike materials are a common source of daytime
glare, especially around sunrise and sunset. In addition to 4-story buildings with a minimum of one floor of residential or
one floor of office (with parking), the proposed Project allows for up to four (4) story hotels which would be built with
textured, non -reflective surfaces, non -reflective (mirrored) glass and downward shielded lighting to minimize glare and
prevent spillover onto adjacent structures. As a result, the Project would result in a less than significant glare impact.
References:
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2016. California Scenic Highways Mapping System.
13
2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and
Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use
in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources,
including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled
by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land,
including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest
carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources
Board. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
X
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b
Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson
X
Act contract?
c
Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land
X
(as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526),
or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
d
Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to
X
non -forest use?
e
Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to
X
initial Study location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to
non -forest use?
Comments:
2.a-e. Agricultural and Forest Resources impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis
is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current
urbanized area.
14
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management
or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Documented in
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
X
quality plan?
b
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
X
pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under
an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
X
concentrations?
d
Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors)
X
adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Comments:
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential -Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and
evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to
four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is
provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the
Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, air quality impacts associated with the 499
hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
3.a. Same Impact. The 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) serves as South Coast Air Quality Management
District's (SCAQMD) state implementation plan (SIP) submittal to California Air Resources Board (CARB) to track the path
towards the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) reaching attainment under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). The Project area is designated as OTSP Downtown Core District.
The Project is a Permitted Use of the Downtown Core District and the City of Temecula Zoning Ordinance and would
therefore be consistent with existing general plan land use designations.
Emissions of criteria pollutants and precursors were modeled using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod)
Version 2016.3.2 computer program (CAPCOA 2016). Detailed information regarding modeling assumptions and outputs can
be found in Appendix A. Project construction would generate exhaust emissions from construction equipment and vehicle
trips, fugitive dust from demolition and ground disturbing activities, and off -gas emissions from architectural coatings and
paving. Operation of the Project would increase the amount of operational air emissions from vehicles accessing the project
site (mobile sources), natural gas consumption (energy sources), and use of consumer products and operation of landscaping
equipment (area sources). However, as discussed below, construction and operation of the project would not result in daily
emissions in exceedance of the SCAQMD's CEQA thresholds of significance for emissions of ROG, NOx, PM1o, and PM2.5. As
discussed above, the SCAB is in nonattainment for several of the NAAQS (ozone and PM2.5) and CAAQS (ozone, PM1o, and
PM2.5). Because emissions of ROG, NOx, PM2.5, and PM10 would not exceed these thresholds, construction- and operation -
related emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors would not conflict with an applicable AQMP. This impact would be
less than significant.
15
3.b. Same Impact. As discussed above, construction of the Project would generate criteria pollutants and precursor
emissions from the use of heavy-duty equipment, worker commute trips, and fugitive dust emissions.
The Project would generate emissions associated with typical activities associated with congregate car including mobile
source emissions from worker commute trips, persons visiting residents of the Project areas, and residents' use of vehicles.
Natural gas would also be directly consumed on -site from natural gas —powered stove tops and fireplaces as well as
indirectly consumed to produce energy to power the Project. The infrequent application of paint, use of consumer
products and landscaping equipment, and application of fertilizers on landscaped areas would also result in operational
emissions of air pollutants.
Thus, construction- and operation -related emissions of ROG, NOx, PM2.s, and PM10 would remain significant and
unavoidable based on the analysis in the previously certified EIR; no greater impacts would result from the proposed
Specific Plan Amendment No. 9.
3.c. Same Impact. Implementation of the Project would not introduce any new long-term operational sources of TACs.
Therefore, construction related TACs will comprise the analysis of substantial pollutant concentrations.
In relation to air quality, sensitive receptors include infants and children, the elderly, people with illnesses, or others
who are especially sensitive to the adverse health effects of air pollutants (discussed previously). Hospitals, schools,
convalescent facilities, and residential housing are examples of land uses with populations who are sensitive to air
quality impacts. Existing sensitive receptors within the Project Site include residences to the north, south, east, and west
and the ABC Child Care Center to the northeast of the Project Site.
Construction -related activities would result in temporary, intermittent emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM) from
the exhaust of heavy-duty off -road diesel equipment used for construction of the Project. On -road, diesel -powered haul
trucks traveling to and from the project site during construction to deliver materials and equipment would not operate
at a single location for extended periods and therefore would not expose a single receptor to excessive diesel PM
emissions. This analysis focuses primarily on heavy duty construction equipment used on -site that may affect nearby off -
site land uses.
Considering the highly dispersive properties of diesel PM, the relatively low mass of diesel PM emissions that would be
generated during project construction, the relatively short period during which diesel PM -emitting construction activity
would take place in the same location near the same receptors, it is anticipated construction -related TACs would not
expose sensitive receptors to an incremental increase in cancer risk that exceeds 10 in one million or a hazard index of 1.0
or greater. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable based on the analysis in the previously certified EIR; no
greater impacts would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9.
3.d. Same Impact. Odors are typically associated with industrial activities involving the use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum
products, and other strong -smelling elements used in manufacturing processes. Odors are also associated with such uses as
sewage treatment facilities and landfills. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would allow four story buildings in
the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided and would not change the types of uses allowed within
the overall specific plan area. The Project would not introduce any major odor -producing uses that would have the potential
to affect a substantial number of people. It is expected refuse generated from future development of the Project would be
temporarily stored in covered containers and would be removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City's solid waste
regulations. Activities and materials associated with construction would be typical of construction projects of similar type
and size. Any odors that may be generated during construction of future development of the Project would be localized and
would not be sufficient to affect a substantial number of people or result in a nuisance as defined by SCAQMD Rule 402.
Impacts with regard to odors would be less than significant.
16
References:
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2016. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 Computer Program. Available:
http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/. Accessed November 13, 2019.
California Air Resources Board. 2005 (April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective.
Available: https:Hww3.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019.
---. 2015. User Manual for the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk
Assessment Tool Version 2. Last Revised: March 17, 2015. Available:
https:Hww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019.
---. 2019. Area Designations Maps — State/National Standards Homepage. Last updated October 24, 2019. Available:
https:Hww3.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed November 12, 2019.
CAPCOA. See California Air Pollution Control Officers Association.
CARE. See California Air Resources Board.
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines.
Available: https:Hoehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. Accessed November 13,
2019.
SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2017 (April). South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.
Available: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-
thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 12, 2019.
17
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Documented in
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through
X
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b
Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
X
other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c
Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected
X
wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
X
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established
native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the
use of native wildlife nursery Sites?
e
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
X
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation
X
Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved
local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Comments:
4.a — f. Biological Resources were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or
required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area.
18
S. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Documented in
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
X
historical resource pursuant to §15064.5?
b
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
X
archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
c
Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
X
formal cemeteries?
Comments:
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and
evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to
four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is
provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the
Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not
directly result in any site -specific hotel development proposals or projects. Future hotel development projects submitted
for development review to the City of Temecula may be subjected to additional CEQA environmental review including
tribal consultation pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, SB 18 and AB 52. The City of Temecula works closely with local Native
American tribes to ensure that all aspects of potential project impacts to cultural resources are identified, and to ensure
that appropriate conditions of approval are applied. As a result, cultural resource impacts associated with the Specific
Plan Amendment would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
5.a. Same Impact. A historical resource is defined in Section 15064.5(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as any object, building,
structure, Site, area, place, record, or manuscript determined to be historically significant or significant in the architectural,
engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California.
Historical resources are further defined as being associated with significant events, important persons, or distinctive
characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; representing the work of an important creative individual;
possessing high artisticvalues; oryielding information important in prehistory or history. Resources listed in or determined
eligible forthe California Register of Historical Resources, included in a local register, or identified as significant in a historic
resource survey are also considered historical resources under CEQA. Future project construction consistent with SPA 9
would require grading and excavation in areas which could contain previously recorded historic resources. Additional
CEQA analysis and documentation will be required when specific projects are proposed. Less than significant impact with
prior mitigation incorporated.
5.b. Same Impact. Section 15064.5(a)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines generally defines archaeological resources as
any resource that "has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history." Archaeological
resources are features, such as tools, utensils, carvings, fabric, building foundations, etc., that document evidence of past
human endeavors and that may be historically or culturally important to a significant earlier community.
The City of Temecula consulted on April 21, 2020 with the Pechanga Tribe to evaluate the potential impacts of the
proposed Specific Plan Amendment on archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources. Through consultation, the Pechanga
Tribe identified the Old Town Specific Plan as being located within the boundaries of recorded Traditional Cultural
19
Property, 'exva Temeeku. In addition, there are placenames within the near vicinity of the Specific Plan, along with a
number of recorded cultural resources. The Tribe identified the potential for finding subsurface prehistoric cultural
resources during ground disturbing activities within the proposed Specific Plan boundaries.
The Pechanga Tribe provided additional input and refinement to the mitigation measures contained in the 2010 PEIR, due
to the amount of time that has transpired since certification of that PEIR. The following refinements to the 2010 PEIR
mitigation measures do not imply that any additional cultural resource impacts are expected to occur beyond those
identified in the 2010 PEIR, and do not represent significant new information. The mitigation measure refinements are as
follows:
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1a: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all areas slated for development or other
ground disturbing activities shall be subject to a Phase I survey (including a 1-mile radius records search and
intensive archaeological survey) for archaeological resources on a project -specific basis prior to the City's
approval of project plans. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to accompany
the project archaeologist on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the opportunity to comment on the
archaeological report which results from the evaluation. If archaeological resources are encountered during the
survey, the City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the National
Register or California Register by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that
recommendations are made for treatment of these resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If Phase
II archeological evaluations are recommended, the Pechanga Tribe shall consult on all proposed test plans and
participate with the project archeologist during testing and evaluation. All such surveys with recommendations
shall be completed prior to project approval. Any identified resources shall be avoided if feasible. Ground -
disturbing activity in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified
archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for cultural resources shall be monitored
by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s).
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1b: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that during construction, should prehistoric or
historic subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a
Riverside County qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe will be contacted to assess the
significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant,
the City and the archaeologist will determine, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance
measures or other appropriate mitigation. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the
area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work
shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors, if
needed. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural
Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreement entered into with the Pechanga Tribe. This may include
avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in -place preservation of cultural resources, and/or
re -burial on the property in perpetuity. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred
method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s)
cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will
be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development
Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with
respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and shall take into account
the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under
the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning
20
Commission and/or City Council.- Upon completion of earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish
ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are
found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1c: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that for projects in areas which were previously
undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, or
by the Pechanga Tribe pursuant to certified PEIR MM 3.4-1a to be sensitive for cultural resources, at least 30
days prior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe
of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe
to develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall
address the treatment of known cultural resources; appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent
discoveries, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during
grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of
compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and
human remains discovered on the site.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1d: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that if inadvertent discoveries of subsurface
cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Project Applicant, the Project Archaeologist, and the
Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the
mitigation for such resources. If the project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance
or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The
Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and
practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the
Planning Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula City Council.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1e: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all sacred sites, should they be encountered
within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as preferred mitigation, if feasible.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1f: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that in the event that Native American cultural
resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall
be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of
preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula
Community Development Department:
o Preservation -In -Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the
resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity
of the resources. ii.) Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall
include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any
future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic
recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native
American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of
contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV
21
Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request.
If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally
appropriate manner at a Pechanga Tribe curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office
of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use
pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title,
and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of
curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials
have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City.
There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods and Native American
human remains. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV
monitoring report.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-4a: Consistent with State law, CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Temecula's General
Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-39, the City of Temecula shall require that if human
skeletal remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the find shall cease and the
Riverside County coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains If the County coroner determines that the
remains are Native American, he or she will contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance
with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by
AB 2641). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased
Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the
remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according
to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human
remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has
discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding
their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Per Public
Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally
accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are
located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and
conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their
recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains.
In addition, Tribal Cultural Resources are defined in the CEQA statute and Guidelines as sites, features, places, cultural
landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included or
determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) or included in
a local register of historical resources, or a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant. A cultural landscape that meets these criteria is a tribal cultural resource to the
extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. Historical resources,
unique archaeological resources, or non -unique archaeological resources may also be tribal cultural resources if they meet
these criteria. Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources are evaluated in Section 18 of this Initial Study Checklist.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not directly result in any site -specific hotel development proposals or
projects. Future hotel development projects allowed by the Specific Plan Amendment and submitted for development
review to the City of Temecula will be subjected to additional CEQA environmental review including cultural resource
investigations and tribal consultation pursuant to the CEQA Statute and Guidelines, SB 18 and AB 52. The City of Temecula
works closely with local Native American tribes to ensure that all aspects of potential project impacts to cultural resources
are identified, and where required, are mitigated. As a result, cultural resource impacts associated with the Specific Plan
22
Amendment would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. Less than significant impact with prior
mitigation incorporated.
5.c. Same Impact. The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of the City. Project construction would require ground
disturbing activities included grading and excavation in a previously undeveloped area. Although no known human
remains exist onsite there is a potential that ground disturbing activates could disturb previously unknown human
remains. Therefore, impacts to human remains would remain less than significant with implementation of the previously
adopted mitigation measures.
References:
City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Open Space Conservation Element, Figure OS-2, Historic
Structures and Sites, page OS-16.
23
6. ENERGY. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
as Compared to
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Impact
Documented in
Documented in
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to
X
wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy
resources, during project construction or operation?
b
Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable
X
energy or energy efficiency?
Comments:
6.a-b. Energy Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required
based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 which does not change the types of uses
allowed in the overall Old Town Specific Plan area.
24
7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
X
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
X
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
X
iii. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction?
X
iv. Landslides?
X
b
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
X
c
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
X
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result
in on- or off -Site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the
X
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e
Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic
X
tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers
are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
f
Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or
X
Site or unique geologic feature?
Comments:
7.a-f. Geology and Soils Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or
required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area,
including the fact that the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would occur within the footprint of the current OTSP
area.
25
8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly,
X
that may have a significant impact on the environment?
b
Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for
X
the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Comments:
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated
by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four stories
(when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In
addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District
when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, greenhouse gas emission impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms
would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
8.a. Same Impact. Construction and operation of the Project would increase GHG emissions which have the potential to
cumulatively result in a significant impact on the environment. Construction -related activities that would generate GHG
emissions include operation of heavy-duty equipment and work commute vehicle trips to and from the Project site.
Operation of the Project would result in GHG emissions from vehicle trips accessing the Project site (mobile sector),
electricity and natural gas combustion (energy sector), operation of landscaping equipment (area sector), treatment of
water and wastewater (water sector), and decomposition of solid wastes at landfills (solid waste sector). Emissions from
these sectors and from construction -related activities were modeled using CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2.
Forthe reason stated above, construction and operation of the Project would result in a significant climate change impact.
This impact would remain significant and unavoidable.
8.b. Same Impact. The Project would result in a significant impact if it would generate GHG emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may conflict with applicable regulatory plans and policies to reduce GHG emissions, as discussed in CARB's
2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan (2017 Scoping Plan), Southern California Association of Government's
(SCAG's) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), and the City of Temecula's
Sustainability Plan.
The Project's location in proximity to commercial and other residential uses and its proximity to transit service renders
the project consistent with and in support of the goals and benefits of the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS, which seeks "improved
mobility and accessibility... to reach desired destinations with relative ease and within a reasonable time, using reasonably
available transportation choices." The project would support the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS implementation of "strategies
focused on compact infill development, superior placemaking (the process of creating public spaces that are appealing),
and expanded housing and transportation choices." As such, the project would be consistent with regional plans to reduce
VMT and associated GHG emissions.
City of Temecula Sustainability Plan
The City of Temecula Sustainability Plan was adopted in June 2010 to identify and address current and future climate
change goals. The Sustainability Plan includes several goals for reducing GHG emissions through energy and water
26
efficiency, waste reduction, and embracing cleaner technology. The Project would be consistent with the applicable
sustainability goals outlined in the plan. The Sustainability Plan incorporates the following goals which would be applicable
to the Project:
• Reduce energy consumption throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and programs
that support this goal.
• Support the use of clean energy throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and
programs.
• Reduce total waste generated and reduce the use and release of household hazardous waste.
• Distribute trip types among all modes of transportation (vehicle, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, etc.).
The Project would minimize energy consumption through the use on energy metering and would support the use of clean
energy through meeting the Tier 1 Standards of the CalGreen Code. Energy consumption would additionally be reduced
through compliance with the 2019 California Energy Code, which achieved a 53 percent reduction in residential energy
use as compared to the 2016 California Energy Code through solar photovoltaic installation requirements.
Furthermore, as discussed above, the project would be located close to existing public transit and would encourage multi -
modal transportation (vehicle, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, etc.). The project's consistency with these goals along with the
2017 Scoping Plan and SCAG RTP/SCS would ensure that the project would not conflict with adopted plans, policies, or
regulations for reducing the emission of GHGs. As such the Project would not conflict with any applicable plans or policies
and impacts would be less than significant.
References:
California Air Resources Board. 2017. 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available:
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.
CARB. See California Air Resources Board.
SCAG. See Southern California Association of Governments.
SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas
(GHG) Significance Threshold -- Attachment E. Available: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cega-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Accessed November 18, 2019.
---. 2009 (November 19, 2009). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14
Presentation. Available: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-
cega-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-
presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019.
Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable
Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life. Available:
http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.
27
9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
X
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
X
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
X
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d
Be located on a Site which is included on a list of hazardous
X
materials Sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
e
For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
X
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the
project area?
f
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
X
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
g
Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a
X
significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
Comments:
9.a-g. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is
warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current
urbanized area, including the fact that the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would occur within the footprint of
the current OTSP area.
28
10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
X
requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or
ground water quality?
b
Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere
X
substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may
impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
c
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Site or area,
X
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river
or through the addition of imperious surfaces, in a manner which
would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site;
X
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
X
manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site;
iii) create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the
X
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
X
d
In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk or release of
X
pollutants due to project inundation?
e
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control
X
plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
Comments:
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and
Evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to
four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is
provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the
Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, hydrology and water quality impacts
associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
10.a. Same Impact. The Project area is designated a Priority Development Project area and is required to comply with the
development planning requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) MS4 permit and
the City of Temecula Stormwater Ordinance. As shown in Figure 3, the proposed Project design implements non-structural,
structural, source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs), which can include infiltration basin,
detention basin, vegetated swale, media filter, pervious concrete, storm drain stenciling or signage, protection of material
and trash storage areas from rainfall, and vector avoidance strategies. The proposed Project Site drainage would
29
implement the following BMPs in accordance with the Water Quality Management Plan: capture and convey stormwater
runoff from developed areas to underground retention/detention stormwater water quality mitigation system via private
storm drain inlets and drainage networks. Development of the Project is required to comply with all water quality
standards or waste discharge requirements. By complying with the requirements for a Priority Development Project
impacts related to violation of water quality standards and waste discharge requirements of the Project are anticipated
to be less than significant.
10.b. Same Impact. Water would be supplied to the Project by the Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The Project
would slightly increase the demand for water from the RCWD. The RCWD currently obtains water from the following
primary water sources: 1) local groundwater from the Murrieta-Temecula Groundwater Basin; 2) imported State Water
Project (SWP) and Colorado River water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC) through
the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) and the Western Municipal Water District (WMWD); and 3) recycled water
from both the District and EMWD facilities. The Water Facilities Master Plan predicts an additional annual groundwater
capacity which will be generated through increasing artificial recharge of the groundwater basin by 22,443 acres feet per
year (AFY). An additional annual supply of 5,319 AFY of recycled water is also anticipated by buildout. The full build -out
annual capacity of the EWMD is anticipated to be 115,002 AFY which is greater than the projected build -out annual
production requirement of 110,714 AFY. The proposed Project is considered as part of the full build -out area, and
therefore would be adequately served by the projected water supply for the EMWD and would not substantially decrease
groundwater supplies. As discussed in response 10.a. the Project is designed to promote stormwater infiltration and
groundwater recharge. Therefore, Project impacts would be less than significant.
10.6. Same Impact. The proposed Project area is designated a Priority Development Project area and therefore the
Project area is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Additionally, future Project design is
required to comply with the local City of Temecula Stormwater and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls
Ordinance (Chapter 8.28 et seq.) and regional MS4 Permit (California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego
Region Order No. 139-2013-0001 as amended by 119-2015-0001 and 119-2015-0100) requirements for stormwater
management; as well as the requirements of the City of Temecula Engineering and Construction Manual (Chapter 18) and
the City of Temecula Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (Chapter 18.18 et seq.) Potential erosion, siltation, and
increased runoff would be minimized through implementation of the WQMP and adherence to the Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP). With implementation of erosion and sediment control BMPs, construction would result in a less
than significant erosion, siltation, and runoff impact.
10.c.ii. Same Impact. According to Figure PS-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within
a 100-Year Flood Zone. The Project is required to implement a SWPPP during construction to reduce pollutants and
stormwater runoff. Compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements minimize
potential impacts related to flooding. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant.
10.c.iii. Less Than Significant Impact. Construction within the Project Site would be required to comply with the
development planning requirements of the SDRWQCB MS4 permit and the City of Temecula Stormwater Ordinance.
Future projects would be required to generate a project specific WQMP as required by the City of Temecula Stormwater
Ordinance and as specified in the City's Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan. The implementation of the specific
drainage features within each WQMP, would ensure that the Project would meet the City's MS4 Permit and Stormwater
Ordinance requirements. As a part of the WQMP, the Project would be required to incorporate and maintain LID BMPs
into the project design, which include measures to reduce increases in runoff through hydromodification and infiltration
protection. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant in this regard.
10.c.iv. Same Impact. According to Figure PS-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within
a 100-Year Flood Zone. Therefore, development of the Project area would not result in impacts related to impeding or
redirecting flood flows. The Project would have no impact and analysis of this issue is not necessary.
30
10.d. Same Impact. A seiche is an oscillation of a body of water in an enclosed or semi -enclosed basin, such as a reservoir,
harbor, lake, or storage tank. A tsunami is a great sea wave, commonly referred to as a tidal wave, produced by a significant
undersea disturbance such as tectonic displacement of the sea floor associated with large, shallow earthquakes. Mudflows
result from the downslope movement of soil and/or rock under the influence of gravity.
According to Figure PS-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within a 100-Year Flood Zone
or within a dam inundation area. The Project Site is not subject to tsunami hazards given its distance to the Pacific Ocean.
Furthermore, the gently sloping topography of the project area is not conducive to sustaining mudflows. The Project would
have no impact and analysis of this issue is not necessary.
10.e. Same Impact. Future projects shall be designed to not violate water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements. Future projects would be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the NPDES General
Construction Permit issued by the SDRWQCB. The Project would be required to implement a SWPPP during construction
that includes BMPs to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff from the Project Site. By complying with the NPDES
requirements, potential impacts to conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan are anticipated to be less than significant. No further analysis of this topic is required.
References:
City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-2, Flood Hazards and Dam
Inundation Areas, page PS-11.
31
11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Documented in
Documented in
Impact
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
a
Physically divide an established community?
X
b
Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with
X
any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
Comments:
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and
evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to
four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is
provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the
Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, land use and planning impacts associated with
the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
11.a. Same Impact. The Specific Plan Amendment would not divide and established community and would result in the
same number of hotel rooms (499) as the existing Specific Plan. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-
story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of
office (with parking) is provided) or when four floors of hotel are provided. No changes to the existing General Plan land
use designations would be made and the Project is consistent with surrounding residential and commercial land uses.
Therefore, the Project would have no impact.
11.b. Same Impact. As discussed under Response 11.a., the proposed project would not change the existing General Plan
land use designations or other policy or regulation, other than revising the Specific Plan to indicate that in the Downtown
Core Zoning district four story hotels will be permitted in addition to buildings currently permitted of up to four stories
when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided. As a result,
land use and planning impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010
Program EIR.
The proposed project is consistent with the current City General Plan and City Zoning. Therefore, the Project would not
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating and environmental
impact. Project impacts would be less than significant in this regard.
32
12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
X
that would be of value to the region and the residents of the
state?
b
Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral
X
resource recovery Site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan, or other land use plan?
Comments:
12.a-b. Mineral Resources Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or
required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area.
33
13. NOISE. Would the project result in the:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase
X
in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b
Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne
X
noise levels?
c
For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or
X
an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive noise levels?
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and
evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to
four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is
provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the
Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, noise impacts associated with the 499 hotel
rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
Comments:
13.a. Same Impact. Noise is defined as unwanted sound; however, not all unwanted sound rises to the level of a potentially
significant noise impact. To differentiate unwanted sound from potentially significant noise impacts, the City has
established noise regulations that consider noise -sensitive land uses. The following discussion includes a brief description
of the fundamental principles of noise and commonly used noise descriptors, a summary of applicable noise standards,
and an evaluation of project -generated construction and operational noise.
NOISE PRINCIPLES AND DESCRIPTORS
Audible sound is a physical disturbance in a medium, such as air, that is capable of being detected by the human ear. Sound
waves in air are caused by variations in pressure above and below the static value of atmospheric pressure. Sound is measured
in units of decibels on a logarithmic scale. The "pitch" (high or low) of the sound is a description of frequency, which is measured
in hertz. Most common environmental sounds are composed of a composite of frequencies.
The time -varying characteristic of environmental noise over specified periods of time is described using statistical noise
descriptors in terms of a single numerical value, expressed as A -weighted decibels (dbA). The noise descriptors used in
this analysis are summarized below:
► Leq: The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is used to describe the noise level over a specified period of time, typically 1-
hour, expressed as Leq. The Leq may also be referred to as the "average" sound level.
34
P. Lmax: The maximum, instantaneous noise level.
P. CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level is the average noise level over a 24-hour day that includes an addition of 5
dBA to the measured hourly noise levels between the evening hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and an addition of 10
dBA to the measured hourly noise levels between the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise
sensitivity during the evening and nighttime hours, respectively.
CITY OF TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
The Municipal Code Title 8 Chapter 9.20," Noise," declares that the making, creating, or continuance of excessive noises
are detrimental to the public health, comfort, convenience, safety, welfare, and prosperity of the residents of the City.
Section 9.20.060 establishes sound level limits. The exterior noise limits for each land use classification are summarized in
Table 13-1. One -hour average sound levels are not to exceed the applicable limit. The noise subject to these limits is
defined as that part of the total noise at the specified location that is due solely to the action of said person.
Per the Municipal Code Section 9.20.060.D, construction noise levels measured at or beyond the property lines of any
property zoned residential shall not exceed an average sound level greater than 65 dBA. Further, construction activity
may only occur between 7:00 a.m. through 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Construction activities on Saturday are
limited between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. No construction activity shall be undertaken on Sunday and
national recognized holidays unless exempted by Section 9.20.070 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Table 13-1 City of Temecula Land Use/Noise Standards
Property Receiving Noise
Maximum Noise Level (CNEL, dBA)
Type of Land Use
Land Use Designation
Interior
Exterior'
Residential
Hillside, Rural, Very Low Density, Low Density, Low -Medium Density
45
65
Medium Density
45
65/702
High Density
45
702
Commercial and Office
Neighborhood, Community, Highway Tourist, Service
N/A
70
Professional Office
50
70
Light Industrial
Industrial Park
55
75
Public/Institutional
School
50
65
All Others
50
70
Open Space
Vineyards/Agricultural
N/A
70
Open Space
N/A
70/653
Notes: CNEL = community noise equivalent level, dB = decibel, CNEL = community -noise equivalent level
1 Regarding aircraft -related noise, the maximum acceptable exposure for new residential development is 60 dBA CNEL.
Maximum exterior noise levels up to 70 dBA CNEL are allowed for Multiple -Family Housing.
a Where quiet is a basis required for the land use.
Source: City of Temecula 2005
CONSTRUCTION
Construction hours are proposed to be from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. No demolition would
occur. Noise from construction activities would be generated by the operation of vehicles and equipment involved
35
during various stages of construction: site preparation, grading, building construction, architectural coating, and paving.
The noise levels generated by construction equipment would vary depending on factors such as the type and number of
equipment, the specific model (horsepower rating), the construction activities being performed, and the maintenance
condition of the equipment.
The closest receptors to the project site are approximately 100 feet from the construction site. The City of Temecula has
established a construction -noise significance threshold of 65 dB Leq at a site supporting a sensitive receptor. It is
foreseeable that construction activities could introduce new levels of noise; however, the extent of construction
equipment required to construct the proposed project would be minor due to the size of the project. Moreover, the
proposed project would be constructed over a relatively short period (14 months) and would generate low construction -
related Average Daily Trips (ADT). Project construction would also be required to adhere to Section 9.20.060.D of the
City's municipal code which stipulates that construction activity must be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.
Monday through Friday. Construction noise impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, as documented in the
2010 Program EIR; the current SPA 9 proposal would not increase these impacts.
OPERATION
The existing noise environment in the project vicinity is dominated by traffic noise from nearby roadways, as well as
nearby commercial activities. Long-term operations of the proposed project would have a minimal effect on the noise
environment within the proximity of the project area. Noise generated by the proposed project would result primarily
from the increased traffic on local roads. As a result, project -related traffic noise impacts would remain less than
significant.
13.b. Same Impact. The proposed project would not result in any major operational sources of vibration (e.g., rail lines,
transit stations), and therefore, this discussion focusses on short-term construction -generated vibration. Prior to the
analysis, a brief discussion of vibration principles is included.
111019111104 effiN, 10111001AN 112• 01124
Vibration can be interpreted as energy transmitted in waves through the ground or man-made structures, which
generally dissipate with distance from the vibration source. Because energy is lost during the transfer of energy from
one particle to another, vibration becomes less perceptible with increasing distance from the source.
Vibration sources include the use of heavy-duty equipment during construction. Operational sources include major
transit (e.g., rail, transit stations) development. Maintenance operations and traffic traveling on roadways can also be a
source of such vibration. If its amplitudes are high enough, ground vibration has the potential to damage structures,
cause cosmetic damage or disrupt the operation of vibration -sensitive equipment such as electron microscopes and
advanced technology production and research equipment. Ground vibration and ground -borne noise can also be a
source of annoyance to individuals who live or work close to vibration -generating activities.
Future projects consistent with SPA 9 will require additional CEQA documentation and analysis at the time applications
are submitted. Vibration associated with hotel construction allowed by the Specific Plan is expected to be minor, as pile
driving is not typically required Thus, impacts associated with construction -related ground vibration and vibration noise
would remain less than significant.
13.c. Same Impact. According to Figure LU-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within
an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport. The French Valley Airport located at 37600 Sky Canyon
Drive, Murrieta, is approximately 4.6 miles northeast of the Project Site. No further analysis of this topic in the Initial
Study is required. Thus, impacts associated with airport related noise would remain less than significant.
36
14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact
same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
as Compared to
Compared to Impact
Compared to Impact
Impact
Documented in
Documented in
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either
X
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b
Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing,
X
necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Comments:
Population and Housing Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or
required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9.
37
15. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
as Compared to
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Impact
Impact
Documented in
Documented in
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered government facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times, or other performance objectives for any of the following
public services:
a
Fire protection?
X
b
Police protection?
X
c
Schools?
X
d
Parks?
X
e
Other public facilities?
X
Comments:
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and
evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to
four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is
provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the
Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, public service impacts associated with the 499
hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
15.a. Same Impact. Fire protection and emergency medical services are provided to the City and the Project Site by the
Temecula Fire Department (FD), who contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). The Project is not
expected to induce substantial population growth nor would it result in substantial adverse effects on Temecula FD
services and facilities which would require new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Additionally, the future
projects would be required to pay the Fire Development Impact Fee at the time of building permit. The Project would have
a less than significant impact.
15.b. Same Impact. Police services for the City and the Project Site are provided by the City of Temecula Police Department
(PD), who contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff Department (RCSD). The Project is not expected to induce substantial
population growth and result in substantial adverse effects on Temecula PD services and facilities which could result in
the need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. No further analysis of this topic is required. The Project
would have a less than significant impact.
15.c. Same Impact. The Project Site falls under the jurisdiction of the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD).
Project development would not generate school -aged children and thus would not result in the need for new or physically
altered facilities to maintain service. The Project would have a less than significant impact on schools.
38
15.d. Same Impact. Project implementation would ultimately introduce hotel occupants and temporary construction
workers into the Downtown Core District. This population increase is considered temporary and could possibly increase
short term demand on park services and facilities which is not expected to result in the need for new or physically altered
facilities to maintain service. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on parks.
15.e. Same Impact. The Project Site is currently served by the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library, 3.5 miles away
at 30600 Pauba Road. The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth and result in substantial adverse
effects on library services so that there was a need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Therefore,
the Project would have a less than significant impact on library resources.
39
16. RECREATION. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
as Compared to
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Impact
Impact
Documented in
Documented in
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and
X
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b
Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
X
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Comments:
16a-b. Recreation Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required
based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9.
40
17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the
X
circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
b
Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
X
section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c
Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature
X
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d
Result in inadequate emergency access?
X
Comments:
A Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) memorandum has been prepared for the SPA by Fehr & Peers, and is included in
Appendix A of this EIR Addendum. Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total
number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing
adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-
story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of
office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story
buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, transportation/traffic impacts
associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
17.a. Same Impact. Project -related construction activities have the potential to result in short-term, temporary impacts
to surrounding roadways as a result of construction vehicles and worker vehicle trips, which may cause temporary traffic
slowdown or partial road closures. There are no conflicts with a program, pan ordinance or other policy document.
Therefore, since these impacts are temporary and short-term, the Project's impacts would be less than significant.
17.b. Same Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 describes specific considerations for evaluating a project's
transportation impacts. Generally, vehicle miles traveled (or "VMT") is identified as the most appropriate measure of
transportation impacts. For the purposes of this CEQA section, "vehicle miles traveled" refers to the amount and distance
of automobile travel attributable to a project. Lead agencies are required to approve a VMT significance threshold by July
1, 2020. Because the City of Temecula does not have an approved VMT significance threshold at this time, a VMT
evaluation will not be conducted for the Project and it has been determined by the City that a level of service (LOS)
evaluation is not required due to the limited changes proposed as part of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9, which does not
change the overall number of hotel rooms that were previously analyzed in the certified Program EIR.
The proposed allowance of hotel use in lieu of either residential or hotel use on the fourth floor, assuming an averaged
rate in the Downtown Core could potentially add approximately 10.81 more trips per day per 1,000 square feet of area,
including 0.27 more AM peak hour trips and 0.52 more PM peak hour trips per KSF. The trip rates are considered
conservative. The conversion of the hotel trip rate to square feet/room does not factor in the hotel common space areas,
such as the lobby and conference rooms, as is typically factored into published trip generation rates. Factoring in the
common space areas would reduce the converted trip rate for hotel use.
41
Although Level of Service (LOS) analysis is no longer required by CEQA effective July 1, 2020, it was the applicable traffic
impact analysis methodology in place when the 2010 Program EIR was certified. The Old Town Specific Plan states than
"an intersection specific level of service (LOS) E and F will be deemed acceptable along Old Town Front Street from Second
Street to Moreno Road (north loop)", which is within the Downtown Core. Therefore, the proposed change in land use is
not forecast to result in a significant traffic impact. The comparison showed that replacing residential or office use (based
on an average rate) with hotel use may result in an additional 10.81 trips per day per 1,000 square feet of area. This minor
increase in trip generation would not substantially increase traffic or exceed significance thresholds in the OTSP.
The Program EIR did not quantify the potential development of the OTSP policy that states "All four-story buildings in
the Downtown Core district must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use or one floor of office with on -
site parking". Additionally, the number of hotel rooms within the Downtown Core is restricted to 499 rooms. Future
development that proposes hotel use that exceeds what is covered under the 2010 OTSP Program EIR will require further
CEQA environmental analysis regardless of how many stories are proposed. Since the height of the hotel projects does
not change the cap of 499 rooms, the hotel use -related traffic that will be allowed by the Specific Plan Amendment was
adequately covered under the 2010 OTSP Program EIR, and would remain less than significant.
17.c. Same Impact. Roadways surrounding the Project Site are part of an established road network that serves the City
of Temecula and do not contain sharp curves or dangerous intersections. Construction of the Project would alter
pedestrian and vehicular access to the Project Site (i.e. new sidewalks, curbs, etc.). The proposed internal circulation
and vehicular access adhere to the City's design standards in relation to protection or pedestrian and bicycle traffic and
does not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible use. Therefore, a less than
significant impact would occur. No further analysis of this topic is required.
17.d. Same Impact. Roadways surrounding the Project Site are part of an established road network that serves the City of
Temecula. The Project includes adequate emergency access and would implement traffic control measures such as
construction flagmen, signage, etc. as needed. Furthermore, final design plans would be reviewed by the City Public Works
Department and Temecula FD to ensure adequate emergency access is maintained. The Project is not part of a City -
designated emergency evacuation route nor would it prevent implementation of the City's emergency response plan.
Therefore, construction of the Project is not expected to result in inadequate emergency access and would have a less
than significant impact.
42
18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
as Compared to
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Impact
Impact
Documented in
Documented in
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal
X
cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as
either a Site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place,
or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and
that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of
X
Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources
as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and
X
supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c)
of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe.
Comments:
Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts were not evaluated in the certified 2010 Program EIR, as it was certified prior to the
existence of AB 52, which requires the evaluation of Tribal Cultural Resources in CEQA documents. The City of Temecula
consulted with the Pechanga Tribe on April 21, 2020 to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed Specific Plan
Amendment on archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources. Through consultation, the Pechanga Tribe identified the Old
Town Specific Plan as being located within the boundaries of recorded Traditional Cultural Property, 'exvo Temeeku. In
addition, there are placenames within the near vicinity of the Specific Plan, along with a number of recorded cultural
resources. The Tribe identified the potential for finding subsurface prehistoric cultural resources during ground disturbing
activities within the proposed Specific Plan boundaries.
Changes in the California Environmental Quality Act, effective July 2015, require that the City address a new category of
cultural resources — tribal cultural resources — not previously included within the law's purview. Tribal Cultural Resources
are those resources with inherent tribal values that are difficult to identify through the same means as archaeological
resources. These resources can only be identified and understood through direct consultation with the tribes who attach
tribal value to the resource. Through consultation pursuant to AB 52, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians ("Tribe")
identified the Old Town Specific Plan ("Project") as being located within the boundaries of a recorded Traditional Cultural
Property,'exva Temeeku. All Luiseno People were created at'exva Temeeku, and this expansive Traditional Cultural
Property (TCP) also includes locations where pivotal historic events occurred related to the Tribe's continued existence,
including the creation of the Pechanga Indian Reservation.
43
The origin of the Luiseno people is the single most important account in the Tribe's culture and oral tradition. The Tribe's
present-day practices, beliefs, cultural identity, and social structure are directly related to the Tribe's Creation, which
occurred within the Project area. Luiseno history begins with the Creation of all things at'exva Temeeku and the
surrounding places. The name 'exva (EXH-vah) can be translated as a "place of sand" and Temeeku (Teh-MEH-koo) means
"sun place." The place known today as Temecula derives its etymology from this physical place, where the Murrieta and
Temecula Creeks converge to form the Santa Margarita River, which flows onto the Pacific Ocean. Because the
name'exva Temeeku is so well known it is often mischaracterized as the place of Creation for Pechanga, but in
fact, 'exva Temeeku is only one portion that is the central to a geographical area that is the place of Tribe's origin.
'Exva Temeeku has always been an integral part of Luiseno culture and identity. Mourning ceremonies and songs are
directly related to the creation of the First People and the events surrounding Wuyoot's death. Several scholars have
recorded and analyzed Luiseno songs and ceremonies including Constance Dubois (1908), William Strong (1929), Helen H.
Roberts (1933), John P. Harrington (1932-1941), and Ralph Heidsiek (1966). Their consultants always stressed the
importance of the Origin account to the structure of Luiseno society and culture. Heidsiek recognized the creation account
as "the source of subject matter for all significant Luiseno songs and the basis for guiding traditional social behavior"
(1966, 53). Roberts, who interviewed Pechanga tribal elders, understood the death and mourning ceremonies to be
related to the events surrounding Wuyoot's death and that the songs and traditions are not only shared amongst the
Luiseno, but also neighboring groups (Roberts 1933, 7). Strong found "all songs connected with the mourning ceremonies
seem to refer to the creation story, especially that portion concerning the dying god Wiyot" (1929, 322). Harrington's
consultants also describe the importance of'exvaTemeeku. Josefa Verdugo accompanied Harrington on a place name trip
in 1933 and said "all the stories mention 'exva Temeeku as the first place for starting everything" (Harrington 1986,
3:119:264). One of Harrington's main Luiseno consultants and traditional singer, Jose Albanes, stated "'exva timeeku [is]
the main place where the people were born" and the place where they "burned" Wuyoot (Harrington 1986, 3:125:165).
Albanes and Juan Sotelo Calac, another prominent Luiseno ceremonial leader, said there are many songs that
mention 'exva Temeeku (Harrington 1986, 3:119:166) Bernardo Cuevas, the son of Salvador Cuevas who was one of
Constance DuBois' consultants, told Harrington the "old people in ceremonials talk of that after Wuyoot died, the people
were living at Temecula and from Temecula they scattered" (Harrington 1986, 3:115:260).
In addition to being located within the TCP, there are placenames in the near vicinity of the Project, along with a number
of recorded cultural resources. The information on the tribal cultural resources within the Project area supports that the
Old Town area of Temecula maintains cultural sensitivity.
While the TCP was not included or assessed in the 2010 Environmental Impact Report for the Project, the impacts to the
tribal cultural resource are consistent with those identified in the prior CEQA review. The Project area is located in in -fill,
which means the surrounding area was largely developed prior to the 2010 EIR. The impacts to both cultural resources
and tribal cultural resources have, for the most part, already occurred and additional impacts from the current Project can
be reduced to a level below significance with the incorporation of slightly modified mitigation measures from the 2010
EIR.
Given the sensitivity that continues to exist in the Old Town area of Temecula, the Tribe identified the potential for finding
subsurface prehistoric cultural resources and tribal cultural resources during ground -disturbing activities associated with
the proposed Specific Plan boundaries. The inclusion of the Mitigation Measures listed below, which have only been
modified slightly from the prior measures to provide additional process and clarity, will reduce the impacts to cultural
resources and tribal cultural resources to less than significant.
The Pechanga Tribe provided additional input and refinement to the mitigation measures contained in the 2010 PEIR, due
to the amount of time that has transpired since certification of that PEIR. These refinements are included in Section 5
(Cultural Resources) of this Initial Study/EIR Addendum and are included herein again in this section for ease of reference.
The refinements to the to the 2010 PEIR mitigation measures do not imply that any additional cultural/Tribal Cultural
44
Resource impacts are expected to occur beyond those identified in the 2010 PEIR, and do not represent significant new
information.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1a: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all areas slated for development or other
ground disturbing activities shall be subject to a Phase I survey (including a 1-mile radius records search and
intensive archaeological survey) for archaeological resources on a project -specific basis prior to the City's
approval of project plans. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to accompany
the project archaeologist on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the opportunity to comment on the
archaeological report which results from the evaluation. If archaeological resources are encountered during the
survey, the City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the National
Register or California Register by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that
recommendations are made for treatment of these resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If Phase
II archeological evaluations are recommended, the Pechanga Tribe shall consult on all proposed test plans and
participate with the project archeologist during testing and evaluation. All such surveys with recommendations
shall be completed prior to project approval. Any identified resources shall be avoided if feasible. Ground -
disturbing activity in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified
archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for cultural resources shall be monitored
by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s).
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1b: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that during construction, should prehistoric or
historic subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a
Riverside County qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe will be contacted to assess the
significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant,
the City and the archaeologist will determine, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance
measures or other appropriate mitigation. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the
area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work
shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors, if
needed. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural
Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreement entered into with the Pechanga Tribe. This may include
avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in -place preservation of cultural resources, and/or
re -burial on the property in perpetuity. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred
method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s)
cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will
be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development
Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with
respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and shall take into account
the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under
the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning
Commission and/or City Council.- Upon completion of earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish
ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are
found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1c: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that for projects in areas which were previously
undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, or
45
by the Pechanga Tribe pursuant to certified PEIR MM 3.4-1a to be sensitive for cultural resources, at least 30
days prior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe
of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe
to develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall
address the treatment of known cultural resources; appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent
discoveries; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during
grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of
compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and
human remains discovered on the site.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1d: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that if inadvertent discoveries of subsurface
cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Project Applicant, the Project Archaeologist, and the
Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the
mitigation for such resources. If the project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance
or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The
Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and
practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the
Planning Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula City Council.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1e: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all sacred sites, should they be encountered
within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as preferred mitigation, if feasible.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1f: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation
Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that in the event that Native American cultural
resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall
be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of
preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula
Community Development Department:
o Preservation -In -Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the
resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity
of the resources. ii.) Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall
include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any
future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic
recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native
American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of
contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV
Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request.
If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally
appropriate manner at a Pechanga Tribe curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office
of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use
pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title,
and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of
curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials
46
have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City.
There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods and Native American
human remains. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV
monitoring report.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-4a: Consistent with State law, CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Temecula's General
Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-39, the City of Temecula shall require that if human
skeletal remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the find shall cease and the
Riverside County coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains If the County coroner determines that the
remains are Native American, he or she will contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance
with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by
AB 2641). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased
Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the
remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according
to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human
remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has
discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding
their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Per Public
Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally
accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are
located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and
conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their
recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains.
Tribal cultural resources are defined as sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural
value to a California Native American tribe that are either included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the
California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) or included in a local register of historical resources, or a
resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant. A
cultural landscape that meets these criteria is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. Historical resources, unique archaeological resources, or non -
unique archaeological resources may also be tribal cultural resources if they meet these criteria.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not directly result in any site -specific hotel development proposals or
projects. Future hotel development projects allowed by the Specific Plan Amendment and submitted for development
review to the City of Temecula may be subjected to additional CEQA environmental review including cultural resource
investigations and tribal consultation pursuant to the CEQA Statute and Guidelines, SB 18 and AB 52. The City of Temecula
works closely with local Native American tribes to ensure that all aspects of potential project impacts to tribal cultural
resources are identified, and are conditioned appropriately. As a result, tribal cultural resource impacts associated with
the Specific Plan Amendment would be less than significant.
47
19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or
X
expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage,
electric power, or telecommunications facilities, the construction
or relocation of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
b
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and
X
responsibly foreseeable future development during normal, dry
and multiple dry years?
c
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider
X
which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity
to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
d
Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in
X
excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair
the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e
Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction
X
statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Comments:
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and
evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to
four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is
provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the
Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, utilities and service systems impacts associated
with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR.
19.a. Same Impact. The Project would connect to the existing water system for the City of Temecula. As discussed in the
Hydrology Section, the proposed drainage system is designed to increase stormwater retention and infiltration onsite for
the treatment of wastewater. The Project would connect to existing electric power and would not require new
telecommunication facilities. Relocation of utilities would not be required as part of the Project. Therefore, the impacts
are less than significant, and no further analysis of this issue is necessary.
19.b. Same Impact. As discussed in the Hydrology Section Response 10.b, the Project is part of the Rancho California Water
District (RCWD). Implementation of the Project would not result in an increase in water demand. The proposed Project is
considered as part of the full build -out area, and therefore would be adequately served by the projected water supply
expected for the RCWD during normal, dry, and multiple dry years and would not substantially decrease groundwater
supplies. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on water supplies.
48
19.c. Same Impact. The Project area is designed to treat additional stormwater flow onsite and therefore would not
exceed the capacity of wastewater treatment facilities serving the Project area. Therefore, the Project impacts would be
less than significant and no further analysis of this issue is necessary.
19.d. and e. Same Impact. The City of Temecula has a contract with CR&R Inc. for trash and recycling services. CR&R Inc.
have a total of six disposal facilities which provide state of the art recycling and green waste programs. Given the
capabilities of the CR&R and the small amount of solid waste that would be generated by Project construction and
operation, the Project is not expected to generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the
capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impairthe attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Additionally, solid waste
management under CR&R Inc. is required to comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Therefore,
the Project would also be in compliance with these requirements. Therefore, the impact of the Project on solid waste
would be less than significant and would comply with all applicable regulations.
49
20. WILDFIRE. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or
X
emergency evacuation plan?
b
Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate
X
wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
c
Require the installation or maintenance of associated
X
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk
or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?
d
Expose people or structures to significant risks, including
X
downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of
runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
Comments:
Wildfire Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based
on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the site's urbanized area.
50
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project:
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Increased Impact as
Same Impact as
Reduced Impact as
Compared to Impact
Compared to
Compared to Impact
Documented in
Impact
Documented in
Previous EIR
Documented in
Previous EIR
Previous EIR
a
Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the
X
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b
Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but
X
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c
Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
X
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
Comments:
Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and
evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to
four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is
provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the
Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms
would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR and the mandatory findings of significance would be the
same as identified in the 2010 Program EIR.
21.a. Same Impact. Based on evaluations and discussions contained in this Initial Study, Project development is not
anticipated to substantially degrade the quality of the environment. Furthermore, any potential impacts would be less
than significant.
21.b-c. Same Impact. Based on evaluations and discussions contained in this Initial Study, Project development is not
anticipated to have incremental effects that would be cumulatively considerable effects in context of the effects of past,
current and probable future projects nor is it expected to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings directly or
indirectly. Impacts would be less than significant.
Sources
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2016. California Scenic Highways Mapping System.
51
City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Open Space Conservation Element, Figure OS-3,
Agricultural Resources, page OS-19.
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2016. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 Computer Program. Available:
http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/. Accessed November 13, 2019.
California Air Resources Board. 2005 (April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective.
Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019.
---. 2015. User Manual for the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk
Assessment Tool Version 2. Last Revised: March 17, 2015. Available:
https:Hww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019.
---. 2019. Area Designations Maps — State/National Standards Homepage. Last updated October 24, 2019. Available:
https:Hww3.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed November 12, 2019.
CAPCOA. See California Air Pollution Control Officers Association.
CARB. See California Air Resources Board.
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines.
Available: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. Accessed November 13,
2019.
SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2017 (April). South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds.
Available: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-
thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 12, 2019.
City of Temecula. Chapter 8.48 Heritage Tree Ordinance. Available:
http://www.gcode.us/codes/temecuIa/view.php?topic=8-8_48-i-8_48_150. Accessed December 12, 2019.
California Air Resources Board. 2017. 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available:
https:Hww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.
CARB. See California Air Resources Board.
SCAG. See Southern California Association of Governments.
SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas
(GHG) Significance Threshold -- Attachment E. Available: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cega-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Accessed November 18, 2019.
---. 2009 (November 19, 2009). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14
Presentation. Available: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-
ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Accessed November 18, 2019.
Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable
Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life. Available:
http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.
City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1, Seismic Hazards, page
PS-7.
52
California Air Resources Board. 2017. 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available:
https:Hww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.
CARB. See California Air Resources Board.
SCAG. See Southern California Association of Governments.
SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas
(GHG) Significance Threshold -- Attachment E. Available: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-
source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cega-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Accessed November 18, 2019.
---. 2009 (November 19, 2009). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14
Presentation. Available: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-
ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
Accessed November 18, 2019.
Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable
Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life. Available:
http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019.
City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Land Use Element, Figure LU-2, French Valley Airport Land
Use Compatibility Zones, page LU-7.
City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-2, Flood Hazards and Dam
Inundation Areas, page PS-11.
City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Open Space/Conservation Element, page OS-21.
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire), Orange County Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State
Responsibility Area (SRA), Adopted by Cal Fire on November 7, 2007. Accessed at
http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire_prevention/fire_prevention_wildland_zones_maps. Accessed on June 27, 2019.
53
Appendix A — Traffic Memo
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
Aesthetics
Measure 3.1-3a: The applicant shall ensure that all lighting fixtures shall
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of
contain "sharp cut-off' fixtures, and shall be fitted with flat glass lenses and
Construction /
Temecula
Building Official
Building Permit,
internal and external shielding.
Construction
or other
review of plans,
Designee
field verification
and sign -off by
City of Temecula
Measure 3.1-3b: The applicant shall ensure that all fixtures shall be parallel
with the finished grade of the project site; no fixtures shall be tilted above a
90-degree angle.
Measure 3.1-3c: The applicant shall ensure that site lighting
systems shall be grouped into control zones to allow for open, closing, and
night light/security lighting schemes. All control groups shall be controlled by
an automatic lighting system utilizing a time clock, photocell, and low voltage
relays.
Measure 3.1-3d: The applicant shall ensure that design and layout of the site
shall take advantage of landscaping, on -site architectural massing, and off —
site architectural massing to block light sources and reflection from cars.
Measure 3.1-3e: The applicant shall submit a lighting plan and photometric
plan to be reviewed by the City of Temecula. The lighting plan shall include
design features (such as those mentioned above) to minimize impacts of light
and glare on the surrounding area.
Measure 3.1-3f: The City shall complete a post -installation inspection to
ensure that the site is not excessively illuminated (such that lighting is not
creating excessive glare, unreasonably competing for the public's attention or
creating any roadway safety hazard) and that lighting sources are properly
shielded.
Measure 3.1-3g: In order to mitigate potential impacts to the Mount Palomar
Observatory, all lighting plans shall be reviewed by the City to assure
utilization of low pressure sodium vapor lamps; step-down lighting
techniques; shielding to prevent upward and outward illumination; and
compliance with the County Ordinance No. 655.
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
Measure 3.1-3h: The proposed Specific Plan amendment shall prohibit the use
of highly reflective construction materials on exterior wall surfaces. The
exterior of permitted buildings shall be constructed of materials such as high
performance tinted nonmirrored glass, painted metal panels and pre -cast
concrete or fabricated wall surfaces.
Air Quality
Measure 3.2-2a: The applicant shall ensure that a fugitive dust control
Pre-
SCAQMD
City of Temecula
Issuance of
program is implemented pursuant to the provision of SCAQMD Rule 403.
Construction /
Building Official
Grading Permit
Construction
or other
and field
Designee
verification and
sign -off by City
of Temecula
Measure 3.2-2b: Prior to grading and construction, the applicant shall be
responsible for compliance with the following:
► During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation, maintain
equipment engines in proper tune.
► After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation:
► Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with
repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust
pick up by the wind.
► Spread soil binders.
► Implement street sweeping as necessary.
► During construction:
► Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles
move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site.
► Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the
day.
► Use low sulfur fuel (0.05 percent by weight) for construction equipment.
► Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts.
Measure 3.2-2c: Prior to grading and construction, the applicant shall be
responsible for compliance with the following.
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
► Require a phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily
emissions.
► Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil
during and after the end of work periods.
► Treat unattended construction areas with water (disturbed lands which
have been, or are expected to be, unused for four or more consecutive
days).
► Require the planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on
construction sites.
► Install vehicle wheel -washers before the roadway entrance at
construction sites.
► Wash off trucks leaving the site.
► Require all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and
building materials to be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of
two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides.
► Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion
from stormwater, especially on super pads.
► Require enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of
sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials.
► Control off -road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these
roads, consistent with City standards.
► Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline
power generators.
Measure 3.2-2d: Prior to grading and construction, the applicant shall be
responsible for the paving of all access aprons to the project site and the
maintenance of the paving.
Measure 3.2-2e: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall be
responsible for assuring that construction vehicles are equipped with proper
emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions.
Measure 3.2-2f: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall be
responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related
traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject to the
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
approval and verification by the Public Works Department, shall include, as
appropriate:
► Provision of rideshare incentives.
► Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel.
► Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference.
► Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes.
► Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary.
Measure 3.2-2g: Prior to the building/construction operations, applicant and
individual contractors shall commit in writing to the following:
► Scheduling receipt of construction materials to peak travel periods (i.e.,
7:30 — 8:30 AM and 4:00 — 6:00 PM);
► Routing construction traffic through areas of least impact sensitivity, and
► Limiting lane closures and detours to off-peak travel periods.
Measure 3.2-3a: Construct on -site or off -site bus turnouts, passenger
Pre-
SCAQMD
City of Temecula
Issuance of
benches, and shelters.
Construction
Building Official
Grading Permit
/ Construction
or other
and field
Designee
verification and
sign -off by City
of Temecula
Global Warming/Climate Change
Measure 3.3-1: The applicant shall require implementation of all feasible
Pre-
SCAQMD
City of Temecula
Issuance of
energy efficiency and GHG reduction measures, including but not limited to
Construction /
Building Official
Grading Permit
the following:
Construction
or other
and field
EnergyEfciencx
Designee
verification and
► Design buildings to be energy efficient.
sign -off by City
► Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Use daylight as an
of Temecula
integral part of lighting systems in buildings.
► Use trees, landscaping and sun screens on west and south exterior
building walls to reduce energy use.
► Install light colored "cool' roofs, cool pavements.
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
► Provide information on energy management services for large energy
users.
► Install energy efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and
equipment, and control systems.
► Install light emitting diodes (LEDs) for traffic, street and other outdoor
lighting.
► Limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting.
► Provide education on energy efficiency.
Renewable Energy
► Install solar and wind power systems, solar and tankless hot water
heaters, and energy -efficient heating ventilation and air conditioning.
Educate consumers about existing incentives.
► Install solar panels on carports and over parking areas.
► Use combined heat and power in appropriate applications.
Water Conservation and Efficiency
► Create water -efficient landscapes.
► Install water -efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as soil
moisture -based irrigation controls.
► Use reclaimed water for landscape irrigation in new developments and
on public property. Install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed
water.
► Design buildings to be water -efficient. Install water -efficient fixtures and
appliances.
► Use graywater. (Graywater is untreated household waste water from
bathtubs, showers, bathroom wash basins, and water from clothes
washing machines.) For example, install dual plumbing in all new
development allowing graywater to be used for landscape irrigation.
► Restrict watering methods (e.g., prohibit systems that apply water to
non -vegetated surfaces) and control runoff.
► Restrict the use of water for cleaning outdoor surfaces and vehicles.
► Implement low -impact development practices that maintain the existing
hydrologic character of the site to manage storm water and protect the
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
environment. (Retaining storm water runoff on -site can drastically reduce
the need for energy intensive imported water at the site.)
► Devise a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the
project and location. The strategy may include many of the specific items
listed above, plus other innovative measures that are appropriate to the
specific project.
► Provide education about water conservation and available programs and
incentives.
Solid Waste Measures
► Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste (including, but not
limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard).
► Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green
waste and adequate recycling containers located in public areas.
► Provide education and publicity about reducing waste and available
recycling services.
Land Use Measures
► Include mixed -use, infill, and higher density in development projects to
support the reduction of vehicle trips, promote alternatives to individual
vehicle travel, and promote efficient delivery of services and goods.
► Educate the public about the benefits of well -designed, higher density
development.
► Incorporate public transit into project design.
► Preserve and create open space and parks. Preserve existing trees, and
plant replacement trees at a set ratio.
► Develop "brownfields" and other underused or defunct properties near
existing public transportation and jobs.
► Include pedestrian and bicycle -only streets and plazas within
developments. Create travel routes that ensure that
► destinations may be reached conveniently by public transportation,
bicycling or walking.
Transportation and Motor Vehicles
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
► Limit idling time for commercial vehicles, including delivery and
construction vehicles.
► Use low or zero -emission vehicles, including construction vehicles.
(*The following goals, policies and/or suggestions are guiding principles that
shall be required of the applicant as applicable.)
*Transportation and Motor Vehicles
► Promote ride sharing programs (e.g., by designating a certain
percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating
adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride
sharing vehicles, and providing a web site or message board for
coordinating rides).
► Create car sharing programs. Accommodations for such programs
include providing parking spaces for the car share vehicles at convenient
locations accessible by public transportation.
► Provide the necessary facilities and infrastructure to encourage the use
of low or zero -emission vehicles (e.g., electric vehicle charging facilities
and conveniently located alternative fueling stations).
► Institute a low -carbon fuel vehicle incentive program.
► Provide public transit incentives such as free or low-cost monthly transit
passes.
► Promote "least polluting" ways to connect people and goods to their
destinations.
► Incorporate bicycle lanes and routes into street systems, new
subdivisions, and large developments.
► Incorporate bicycle -friendly intersections into street design.
► For commercial projects, provide adequate bicycle parking near building
entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience. For large
employers, provide facilities that encourage bicycle commuting,
including, e.g., locked bicycle storage or covered or indoor bicycle
parking.
► Create bicycle lanes and walking paths directed to the location of
schools, parks and other destination points.
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
► Work with the school district to restore or expand school bus services.
► Institute a telecommute and/or flexible work hours program. Provide
information, training, and incentives to encourage participation. Provide
incentives for equipment purchases to allow high -quality
teleconferences.
► Provide information on all options for individuals and businesses to
reduce transportation -related emissions. Provide education and
information about public transportation.
*Off -site Mitigation Fund off -site mitigation projects (e.g., alternative energy
projects, or energy or water audits for existing projects) that will reduce
carbon emissions, conduct an audit of its other existing operations and agree
to retrofit, or purchase carbon "credits" from another entity that will undertake
mitigation.
Cultural Resources
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1a: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General
Pre-
Riverside
Riverside County
City of Temecula
Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of
Construction
County
Qualified
Project Approval
Temecula shall require that all areas slated for development or other ground
Qualified
archaeologist
disturbing activities shall be subject to a Phase I survey (including a 1-mile
archaeologist
and Pechanga
radius records search and intensive archaeological survey) for archaeological
and
tribal
resources on a project -specific basis prior to the City's approval of project
Pechanga
plans. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist in
tribal
consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians (Pechanga
Tribe). The Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to accompany the project
archaeologist on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the
opportunity to comment on the archaeological report which results from the
evaluation. If archaeological resources are encountered during the survey, the
City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing
on the National Register or California Register by a Riverside County qualified
archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that recommendations are made
for treatment of these resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If
Phase II archeological evaluations are recommended, the Pechanga Tribe shall
consult on all proposed test plans and participate with the project
archeologist during testing and evaluation. All such surveys with
recommendations shall be completed prior to project approval. Any identified
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
resources shall be avoided if feasible. Ground -disturbing activity in areas
which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified
archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for
cultural resources shall be monitored by a Riverside County qualified
archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s).
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1b: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General
Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of
Temecula shall require that during construction, should prehistoric or historic
subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the
find shall stop and a Riverside County qualified archaeologist, in consultation
with the Pechanga Tribe will be contacted to assess the significance of the
find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined
to be significant, the City and the archaeologist will determine, in consultation
with the Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance measures or other
appropriate mitigation. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not
resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached
by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to
continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal
monitors, if needed. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered
resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan
and Monitoring Agreement entered into with the Pechanga Tribe. This may
include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in -place
preservation of cultural resources, and/or re -burial on the property in
perpetuity. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the
preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural
resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance
or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will
be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The
City Community Development Director shall make the determination based
on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to
archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and
shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of
the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the
decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to
the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. Upon completion of
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural
resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts
that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment
and disposition.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1c: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General
Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of
Temecula shall require that for projects in areas which were previously
undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in
consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, or by the Pechanga Tribe pursuant to
certified PER MM 3.4-1a to be sensitive for cultural resources, at least 30 days
prior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the
Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring
program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to
develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring
Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural
resources; appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent discoveries;
the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal
monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project
grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the
monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred
sites, and human remains discovered on the site.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1d: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General
Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of
Temecula shall require that if inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural
resources are discovered during grading, the Project Applicant, the Project
Archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such
resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such
resources. If the project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on
the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be
presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall
make the determination based on the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall
take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga
Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula City
Council.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1e: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General
Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of
Temecula shall require that all sacred sites, should they be encountered within
the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as preferred mitigation, if
feasible.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-1f: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General
Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of
Temecula shall require that in the event that Native American cultural
resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent
discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition
of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of
preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be
provided to the City of Temecula Community Development Department:
► Preservation -In -Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation
in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where
they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the
resources. ii.) Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The
measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and
provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in
perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging
and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that
sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are
excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of
contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential
Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a
confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. If
preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall
be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a Pechanga Tribe
curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic
Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources
ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and
associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be
accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation.
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility
stating that subject archaeological materials have been received and that
all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City.
There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial
goods and Native American human remains. Results concerning finds of
any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring
report.
Mitigation Measure 3.4-4a: Consistent with State law, CEQA Guidelines, and
the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure
OS-26 and OS-39, the City of Temecula shall require that if human skeletal
remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the
find shall cease and the Riverside County coroner will be contacted to
evaluate the remains If the County coroner determines that the remains are
Native American, he or she will contact the Native American Heritage
Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5,
subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641).
The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely
Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine
what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains. Per Public
Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate
vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards
or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not
damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner
has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with
the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable,
taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Per Public
Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate
vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards
or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not
damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner
has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with
the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable,
taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains.
Hydrology
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
Agency
Mitigation Measure 3.5-1: Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of
for individual projects, the project developer shall file a N01 with California to
Construction /
Temecula
Building Official
Building Permit,
comply with the requirements of the NPDES General Construction Permit
Construction/
or other
review of plans,
(Municipal Code, Chapter 8.24). This would include the preparation of a
Post-
Designee
field verification
SWPPP incorporating construction BMPs for control of erosion and
Construction
and sign -off by
sedimentation contained in stormwater runoff. The project developer shall be
City of Temecula
required by the Stormwater/Urban Runoff Management and Discharge
Controls of the City of Temecula's Municipal Code to submit and implement a
SWPPP using BMPs that would effectively reduce or prevent the discharge of
pollutants into receiving waters.
Measure 3.7-1a: The applicant shall ensure, as specified in City of Temecula
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of
Ordinance No. 94-25, that no construction may occur within one -quarter (1/4)
Construction /
Temecula
Building Official
Grading Permit
of a mile of any occupied residence during the following hours:
Construction
or other
and field
► 6:30 PM to 6:30 AM, Monday through Friday.
Designee
verification and
► Before 7:00 AM or after 6:30 PM, Saturday.
sign -off by City
► At any time on Sunday or any nationally recognized holiday.
of Temecula
Measure 3.7-1b: The applicant shall ensure that all construction equipment will
have properly operating mufflers.
Measure 3.7-1c: The applicant shall ensure that all construction staging shall
be performed as far as possible from occupied dwellings.
Measure 3.7-1d: The applicant shall ensure that signs shall be posted at the
construction sites that include permitted construction days and hours, and a
contact number for thejob site.
Measure 3.7-2a: The construction contractor will conduct crack surveys before
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of
construction activities that could cause architectural damage to nearby
Construction /
Temecula
Building Official
Grading Permit
structures. The survey will include any historic buildings or buildings in poor
Construction
or other
and field
condition within 15 feet of construction. The surveys will be done by
Designee
verification and
photographs, video tape, or visual inventory, and will include inside as well as
sign -off by City
outside locations. All existing cracks in walls, floors, and driveways should be
of Temecula
documented with sufficient detail for comparison after construction to
determine whether actual vibration damage occurred. A postconstruction
survey should be conducted to document the condition of the surrounding
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
buildings after the construction is complete. The construction contractor
would be liable for construction vibration damage to adjacent structures.
Measure 3.7-3a: Building equipment (e.g., HVAC units) shall be located away
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of
from nearby residences, on building rooftops, and properly shielded by either
Construction /
Temecula
Building Official
Grading Permit
the rooftop parapet or within an enclosure that effectively blocks the line of
Construction /
or other
and field
sight of the source from the nearest receptors. The resultant HVAC noise level
Post-
Designee
verification and
shall not exceed 45 dBA at the nearest receptors.
Construction
sign -off by City
of Temecula
Measure 3.7-3b: In order to avoid noise -sensitive hours, commercial and retail
shall prohibit loading and unloading activities between the nighttime hours of
10:00 PM and 7:00 AM.
Measure 3.7-3c: To further address the nuisance impact of loading dock/truck
delivery noise, all loading areas for commercial and retail uses shall be located
at the rear or sides of buildings within the commercial and mixed -use districts,
where noise can be directed away from residential uses within the mixed use
areas of the project.
Measure 3.7-4: If necessary to comply with the interior noise requirements of
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of a
the City of Temecula and achieve an acceptable interior noise level, noise
Construction /
Temecula
Building Official
Certificate of
reduction in the form of sound -rated assemblies (i.e., windows, exterior doors,
Construction /
or other
Occupancy
and walls) shall be incorporated into project building design, based upon
Post-
Designee
recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer. Final recommendations
Construction
for sound -rated assemblies will depend on the specific building designs and
layout of buildings on the site and shall be determined during the design
phase.
Utilities and Services
Measure 3.8-1: The City shall continue to implement its local code that
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of
incorporates standards for parkland dedication and development. The City
Construction
Temecula
Building Official
Building Permit,
requires (1) the dedication of parkland or the payment of in -lieu fees and the
or other
and sign -off by
development of recreation facilities for all new development; and (2)
Designee
City of Temecula
developers of residential projects greater than 200 units must dedicate land
based on the park acre standard of five acres of usable parkland to 1,000
residents.
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
Measure 3.8-3a: Prior to construction in any undeveloped areas, EMWD shall
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of
review the plans for consistency with design criteria. Once approved by the
Construction
Temecula
Building Official
Building Permit,
EMWD engineer, the applicant shall pay the required connection fee to
or other
and sign -off by
EMWD prior to construction of the sewer line.
Designee
City of Temecula
Measure 3.8-3b: Prior to construction, the project applicant and/or each
subsequent project applicant will pay its fair share in mitigation fees to EMWD
to upgrade the First Street and the Pujol Street sewer lines.
Measure 3.8-6: All proposed development plans shall designate adequate and
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of
convenient space on the property to be used for collecting all recyclable
Construction
Temecula
Building Official
Building Permit,
materials generated on the premises.
or other
review of plans,
Designee
field verification
and sign -off by
City of Temecula
Traffic and Transportation
Measure 3.9-1: The project applicant shall incorporate the following features
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of a
into the design of the Specific Plan area:
Construction
Temecula
Engineer or
Certificate of
► At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road
other Designee
Occupancy
provide a northbound through/right-turn lane combination with a right
turn overlap.
► Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to
determine need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the
intersection of Old Town Front Street/Second Street and the northern
Mercedes Street connection to Old Town Front Street and/or
implementation of Roundabouts in the vicinity of Old Town Front Street
and First Street/Santiago Road and Old Town Front Street and Mercedes
Street in the vicinity of the Moreno Road south loop.
► Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect
the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District.
In order to maintain the unique "Main Street" character of the Old Town area,
LOS E and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from
Second Street to Moreno Road North.
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SPA EIR ADDENDUM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measures
Monitoring
Enforcement
Responsible
Action Indicating
Verification of Compliance
Phase
Agency
Monitoring
Agency
Compliance
Initials
Date
Remarks
Measure 3.9-2: The project applicant shall incorporate the following
Pre-
City of
City of Temecula
Issuance of a
features into the design of the Specific Plan area:
Construction
Temecula
Engineer or
Certificate of
► At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road
other Designee
Occupancy
provide a westbound right -turn overlap.
► Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to
determine need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the
intersection of Old Town Front Street/Second Street and the northern
Mercedes Street/Moreno Road connection to Old Town Front Street
and/or implementation of Roundabouts at the north and south entries
to Old Town.
► Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect
the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District.
In order to maintain the unique "Main Street" character of the Old Town area,
LOS E and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from
Second Street to Moreno Road North.
RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO
THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) (LONG RANGE
PROJECT NO. LR20-0209)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. The Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved by the City Council on February
22, 1994 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 94-05. Amendment No. 1 to the Old Town Specific
Plan (SP-5) was approved on January 23, 1996 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 96-01.
Amendment No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 13, 1997 by the
adoption of Ordinance No. 97-06. Amendment No. 3 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was
approved on July 13, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-12. Amendment No. 4 to the Old
Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on October 10, 2000 by the adoption of Ordinance No.
00-11. Amendment No. 5 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on August 24, 2004
by the adoption of Ordinance No. 04-08. Amendment No. 6 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-
5) was approved on June 13, 2006 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 06-07. Amendment No. 7 to
the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 25, 2010 by the adoption of Ordinance
No. 10-09. Amendment No. 8 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on September
5, 2017 by the adoption of Resolution No. 17-56. The Old Town Specific Plan as originally
approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-8 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the
"Specific Plan."
B. The City Council of the City of Temecula certified the Old Town Specific Plan
Final Program Environmental Impact Report ("FPEIR") on May 11, 2010.
C. Staff initiated Long Range Project No. LR20-0209, a Specific Plan Amendment, in
a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
D. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment
No. 9 to the Specific Plan would update and modify those standards including an update to allow
four-story hotels within the Downtown Core district and to add language to the Specific Plan to
clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height.
E. On May 6, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No.I to the Old Town Specific Plan Final
Program Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific
Plan (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address
the Planning Commission.
F. After hearing all oral and written testimony from staff and all written testimony
from the public on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments received, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-11 recommending to the City Council that the
Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Final Program Environmental Impact Report be approved. The
Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 2020-12 recommending to the City Council
that the proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) be approved.
G. On May 26, 2020, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project
and Addendum No. 1 to the Final Program Environment Impact Report for the Project at a duly
noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did provide
comments either in support of or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the
testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Addendum No. 1 to the Final
Program Environmental Impact Report prior to and at the public hearing.
H. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-
certifying Addendum No.I to the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Old Town
Specific Plan Amendment.
I. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law.
J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving Amendment No. 9 to the
Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and
Development Code.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of
Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted on page LU-26,
anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies
the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan
Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Goal 7 of having "A
viable, high -quality Old Town Temecula area that enhances the City economically,
preserves historic structures, and provides civic, cultural, shopping, and meeting and
gathering places for tourists and residents." The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also
complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan
amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section
17.01.040 (relationship to General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula
General Plan goals, policies and objectives.
B. The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City s General
Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies,
N
guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old
Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the
public health, safety and welfare.
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations
and the anticipated land use developments.
The Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres, and the subject area of
the Specific Plan Amendment (the Downtown Core district) comprises approximately 48
acres of the Specific Plan. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan
(page LU-32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning
document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all
anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire Specific Plan area has been
reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically
suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan.
D. The proposed specific plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable
character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding
neighborhood.
As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU-30, Old Town
Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that
Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic
development activities. The Old Town Specific Plan was originally adopted to support and
complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the proposed
Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan further support its downtown character. The
City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the
Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development
trends in the area (LU-40). As such, the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific
Plan provides a means to enhance the area economically while also ensuring the
development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development
in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood.
Section 3. Approval of Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5). The City
Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town
Specific Plan (SP-5) in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26th day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
2.Old Town Zoning Districts
a. Downtown Core (DTC)
The Downtown Core district is intended to provide for
uses that support pedestrian oriented and mixed -use
development. The Downtown Core Zoning district is
defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four
stories (when at least one floor of residential is
provided,,—; or —when at least one floor of office (with
parking) is provided; or when four floors of hotel are
provided). The Downtown Core is intended to
accommodate a variety of land uses that will create a
vibrant public realm. Uses include, but are not limited
to art galleries, museums, restaurants, entertainment
oriented uses, small scale boutique retailers such as gift,
specialty food, and antique shops and similar retail uses,
offices and service oriented uses. Residential
development at 40 to 70 dwelling units per acre and
mixed -use developments are also anticipated within this
district. Service and office uses are restricted to the
second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town
Front Street and Main Street. Residential uses are
permitted in the Downtown Core Zoning district, but
are also restricted to the second floor and higher for
parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street.
All four story buildings in the Downtown Core district
must contain at least one floor restricted to residential
use; of -one floor of office with on -site parking; or four
floors of hotel uses.
b. Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay (DTC/HO)
The Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district is intended
to encourage the development of a hotel with
conference facilities, restaurant and other guest
services. The Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district
permits a full service hotel with conference facilities,
restaurant and other guest services, to be constructed at
a greater building height than other buildings (up to
eight stories) in the underlying Downtown Core district.
This will provide adequate visitor accommodations for
Old Town and the surrounding area.
c. Residential/Limited Mixed -Use (R/LMU)
The Residential/Limited Mixed -Use district is intended
to provide for attached residential at 20 to 70 dwelling
units per acre, or mixed -use development to
accommodate a variety of attached housing types with
some opportunities for ground floor retail and restaurant
uses. Office uses are also permitted and may be located
on the first or second floor. When a building in this
zone is proposed to be a fully residential use the
residential units may be located on the first floor. The
construction of a neighborhood market is also
anticipated in this district to support the surrounding
residential uses in this area.
d. Neighborhood Residential (NR)
The Neighborhood Residential district is intended to
provide for attached and detached three-story residential
development at a density of 20 to 35 dwelling units per
acre. Typical housing types include detached single
family, multi -family, duplexes, triplexes,
condominiums, and apartments. Commercial uses
proposed as a part of a live/work project are limited to
the first floor only.
e. Civic District (CV)
The Civic district is intended to provide for public and
quasi -public uses such as parks, City offices, and
government buildings, police/fire stations, senior citizen
centers, community centers and other community
assembly uses, public museums, libraries, public art
displays and similar facilities. Due to the unique nature
of buildings and uses located within the Civic district
strict application of the development standards do not
apply.
f. Open Space District (OS)
The Open Space district includes both public and
private areas of permanent open space along the
floodways of Murrieta Creek. The Open Space district
is intended to provide for the preservation of biological
and cultural resources, and to protect the public from
flood hazards. The future Murrieta Creek Restoration
Project and Trail is anticipated to be located within the
Open Space district. No other development will occur
in this zone.
C. LAND USE REGULATIONS
The land uses in the Old Town Specific Plan area are
regulated by district in order to achieve the mixed -use
character envisioned for the area.
Each zone establishes the land uses that are permitted,
conditionally permitted or not permitted in the zone.
Table IV-1, Land Use Matrix, outlines the allowable
land uses by zone. The land use regulations, combined
with the regulating plan for each zone, are intended to
implement the goals, policies and objectives of this
Specific Plan and accomplish the vision for Old Town.
If a land use is not listed in the land use matrix a land
use determination shall be made by the Planning
Commission.
The Civic district (CV) is exempt from the development
standards and not included in the land use matrix. The
Open Space (OS) zone is not included in the land use
matrix because there will be no development within this
district expect for what is constructed as part of the
Murrieta Creek Trail project.
City of Temecula — Old Town Specific Plan
IV-10
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Except hotel operations, business activities within the Residential/Limited Mixed -Use and Neighborhood Residential during the hours of 12:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m.
shall require a Conditional Use Permit.
Any use not explicitly stated above shall require a use determination by the Planning Commission.
P Use is permitted by right
C Use is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit
- Use is not permitted
1. Use is limited to ground floor only.
2. These uses are limited to either the second floor (or higher) or to locations that do not front upon or open directly onto either Old Town Front
Street or Main Street.
3. This use is limited to locations that front Moreno Road. Full service hotel uses with food service and conference facilities at heights greater than three
stories but limited to eight stories may be considered under a Conditional Use Permit. Subject to the Supplemental Standards for hotels over 3 stories.
4. Full service hotel uses with food service and conference facilities in the Downtown Core -Hotel Overlay (DTC/HO) are allowed eight stories. Subject to the
Supplemental Standard and Special Use Standards in Section IV.G of this chapter, for hotels over tlreefour stories.
5. Outdoor entertainment is not permitted in Old Town. City sponsored signature events and/or events when the City is the applicant are exempt. Outdoor live
entertainment may be considered for private businesses in Old Town with a Temporary Use Permit as appropriately conditioned, limited to one event per
quarter.
6. Ground floor residential not permitted in the Downtown Core area along Old Town Front Street and Main Street.
7. Shall include a store front tasting room. Premises with or without the product sale for off -site consumption is limited to a Department of Alcoholic Beverage
Control License Type 02 (Winery/Winegrower).
8. Premises with or without the product sale for off -site consumption is limited to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control License Type 02
(Winery/Winegrower).
9. Outdoor Dining or Sidewalk Cafes are permitted in conjunction with a restaurant subject to the review and approval of a Minor Modification or as approved
with a Development Plan application.
10. Premises with or without the product sale for off -site consumption applying for any Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control License type other than a
Type 02 (Winery/Winegrower).
11. Subject to Chapter 17.10 Supplemental Development Standards of the Development Code.
12. This use is permitted on either the ground floor or second floor.
City of Temecula — Old Town Specific Plan IV-12
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS — DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Height
The table below outlines the allowable building types
and building heights in the Downtown Core and
Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district. Additional
standards related to Building Types are addressed in
Section E of this chapter and shall be applied to all
projects in the Downtown Core and Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay district. Sections V.B and V.0 of
the Design Guidelines Chapter, also discuss basic
building forms and the architectural character that is
required to reflect the historical context of Old Town
Temecula and shall be applied to all building
constructed in the Downtown Core and Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay district. The Design Guidelines
contained in Chapter V shall be used in concert with the
urban standards contained in this chapter.
Building Type and Building Frontage Standards shall be
applied as required in Section E and F of this chapter.
'Allowable Building Height in the Hotel Overlay is eight stories
equivalent to no more than 100 feet to allow by right a full
service boutique hotel with food service and conference
facilities.
'Buildings adjacent to a designated historic structure that share a
street frontage shall not be constructed more than one story or
25 feet higher than the historic structure, in the adjacent 25 feet
of frontage.
' Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which
provides criteria for Minor Exceptions to development
regulations, may be utilized for building height in Old Town for
the purpose of providing architectural elements to a portion (or
portions) of a building to add roofline variation or to otherwise
enhance the aesthetics of the building consistent with its
architectural style. A Minor Exception is not intended to be
utilized to add overall height to the base roof line of the building
nor to add extra floor to ceiling height of any one or more
stories.
Table IV-8:
Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the
Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District
Allowable Building
Building Type'
Permitted
Not Permitted
Height
(max. feet/ stories)2, 3, a
Rowhouse
X
50 feet maximum height in
4 stories
50 feet maximum height in
3 stories; but up to 50 feet
in four stories allowed
when at least one level is
Courtyard Building
X
residential; when one
level is office and parking
is provided; or when four
floors of hotel are
provided.
50 feet maximum height in
3 stories; but up to 50 feet
in four stories when at least
Commercial Block
X
one level is residential;
when one level is office
and parking is provided; or
when four floors of hotel
are provided.
Detached House
X
N/A
Duplex, Tri-plex, Quad-
N/A
plex
X
Bungalow Courtyard
X
N/A
City of Temecula — Old Town Specific Plan 1V-20
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS — RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED -USE DISTRICT
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Heights
The table at right outlines the allowable building types
and building heights in the Residential/Limited Mixed -
Use district. Additional standards related to building
types are addressed in Section IV.E of this chapter and
shall be applied to all projects in the
Residential/Limited Mixed -Use district. Section V.B
and V.0 of the Design Guidelines, also discuss basic
building forms and the character required to reflect the
historical context of Old Town Temecula and shall be
applied to all buildings constructed in the
Residential/Limited Mixed -Use district. The Design
Guidelines contained in Chapter V shall be used in
concert with the urban standards contained in this
chapter.
1 Building Type Standards shall be applied as required
in Section E of this Chapter.
'Buildings adjacent to a designated historic structure
that share a street frontage shall not be constructed
more than one story or 25 feet higher than the historic
structure in the adjacent 25 feet of frontage.
3 Roof pitches shall not be counted toward the
maximum height limit for the zone.
'Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which provides
criteria for Minor Exceptions to development regulations, may be
utilized for building height in Old Town for the purpose of providing
architectural elements to a portion (or portions) of a building to add
roofline variation or to otherwise enhance the aesthetics of the
building consistent with its architectural style. A Minor Exception is
not intended to be utilized to add overall height to the base roof line
of the building nor to add extra floor to ceiling height of any one or
more stories.
Table IV-17:
Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the Residential/Limited Mixed -Use District
Building Type'
Permitted
Not Permitted
Allowable Building Height
(max. feet/stories)
Rowhouse
X
40 feet maximum height in
three stories.
40 feet maximum height in
three stories, or up to three
stories in 50 feet when a
Courtyard Building
X
mixed -use building includes at
least one floor of residential or
when one level is office and
arkin isprovided.
40 feet maximum height in
three stories, or up to three
stories in 50 feet when a
Commercial Block
X
mixed -use building includes at
least one floor of residential or
when one level is office and
arkin is rovided.
Bungalow Courtyard
X
40 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Duplex, Triplex, Quad-
X
40 feet maximum height in
plex
three stories.
Detached House
X
N/A
City of Temecula — Old Town Specific Plan IV-35
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS — NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
A. Allowable Building Types and Building Heights
Table IV-28 below outlines the allowable frontage
types and building heights in the Neighborhood
Residential District. Additional standards related to
building types are addressed in Section IV-E of this
chapter and shall be applied to all projects in the
Neighborhood Residential District. The Design
Guidelines contained in Chapter V Sections B and C
also discuss basic building forms and the character
required to reflect the historical context of Old Town
Temecula and shall be applied to all buildings
constructed in the Neighborhood Residential District.
The Design Guidelines contained in Chapter V shall be
used in concert with the urban standards contained in
this.
' Building Type Standards shall be applied as required in
Section E of this chapter.
2 Buildings adjacent to a designated historic structure that
share a street frontage shall not be constructed more than
one story or 25 feet higher than the historic structure in the
adjacent 25 feet of frontage.
'Roof pitches shall not be counted toward the maximum
height limit for the zone.
^ Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which provides
criteria for Minor Exceptions to development regulations, may be utilized
for building height in Old Town for the purpose of providing
architectural elements to a portion (or portions) of a building to add
roofline variation or to otherwise enhance the aesthetics of the building
consistent with its architectural style. A Minor Exception is not intended
to be utilized to add overall height to the base roof line of the building
nor to add extra floor to ceiling height of any one or more stories.
Table IV-28:
Allowable Building Types and Building Heights in the Neighborhood Residential District
Building Type'
Permitted
Not Permitted
Allowable Building a Height
(max. feet/stories)
Rowhouse
X
50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Courtyard Building
X
50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Bungalow Courtyard
X
50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Duplex, Triplex,
Quadplex
X
50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Detached House
X
50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Commercial Block
X
N/A
City of Temecula — Old Town Specific Plan IV-53
PC RESOLUTION NO.2020-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO.
2009071049)"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. In May 2010, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a comprehensive
amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). At that time, the City certified a
Final Program Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2009071049 ("EIR"), to
comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") for approval
of the Specific Plan Amendment.
B. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment
No. 9 to the Specific Plan would update and modify those standards including an update to allow
four-story hotels within the Downtown Core district and to add language to the Specific Plan to
clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height.
C. The City has caused an Addendum No. 1 ("Addendum") to be prepared for the
Specific Plan Amendment in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines because the
Specific Plan Amendment does not require the preparation of a new or supplemental
environmental impact report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164.
D. Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental
Impact Report, City of Temecula, California, State Clearinghouse No. 97121030 ("Addendum No.
1 ") addresses potential environmental impacts that might result from the Specific Plan
Amendment.
E. An addendum need not be circulated for public review but is attached to a final EIR
in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15164.
F. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Addendum No. 1 in conjunction
with the Program EIR.
G. On May 6, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final
Program Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific
Plan (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address
the Planning Commission.
H. The Planning Commission has reviewed the findings made in this Resolution and
finds that they are based upon substantial evidence in the record of proceedings. The documents,
staff reports, and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution
is based are on file and available for public examination on the City's website at TemeculaCA.gov.
I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending that the
City Council approve the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. The City has reviewed the potential impacts of Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town
Specific Plan (SP 5) and the potential benefits to the City of Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town
Specific Plan (SP 5) and has concluded that Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP
5) is in the best interests of the City.
B. Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP 5) is consistent with the
City's General Plan including the goals and objectives thereof and each element thereof.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section
15164, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and
determinations in connection with the approval of the Specific Plan Amendment:
A. Some changes or additions to the Program EIR are necessary, but none of the
conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a
subsequent EIR have occurred.
B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the Amendments that will require
major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects;
C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under
which the Amendments are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previously certified
Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previously
certified Program EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the Amendments will have one or more
significant effects not discussed in the Program EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously
examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the Program EIR; (c) there are
mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible
and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines
to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are
considerably different from those analyzed in the Program EIR would substantially reduce one or
more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure
or alternative.
Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
hereby recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Addendum No. 1 to the
Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2009071049) for
Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan per Exhibit "A" attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 6th day of May, 2020.
0��iFn�a Turley- 4T,:J-14iai-c!5F
ATTEST -
Luke Watson
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020-11 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of May,
2020, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo,
Watts, Youmans
None
None
None
.uke Watson
Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO.
2009074049)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. In May 2010, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a comprehensive
amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). At that time, the City certified a
Final Program Environmental Impact Report, State Clearinghouse No. 2009071049 ("EIR"), to
comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") for approval
of the Specific Plan Amendment.
B. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment
No. 9 to the Specific Plan would update and modify those standards including an update to allow
four-story hotels within the Downtown Core district and to add language to the Specific Plan to
clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height.
C. Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental
Impact Report, City of Temecula, California, State Clearinghouse No. 97121030 ("Addendum No.
I") addresses potential environmental impacts that might result from the Specific Plan
Amendment.
D. The City has caused an Addendum No. 1 ("Addendum") to be prepared for the
Specific Plan Amendment in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines because the
Specific Plan Amendment does not require the preparation of a new or supplemental
environmental impact report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164.
E. An addendum need not be circulated for public review but is attached to a final EIR
in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15164.
F. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Addendum No. 1 in conjunction
with the Program EIR.
G. On May 6, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No.I to the Old Town Specific Plan Final
Program Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific
Plan (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address
the Planning Commission.
H. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly
considering the comments received, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-11
recommending to the City Council that Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Final Program
Environmental Impact Report be approved. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution
No. 2020-12 recommending to the City Council that the proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old
Town Specific Plan (SP-5) be approved.
I. On May 26, 2020 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on the proposed Addendum No.I to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program
Environmental Impact Report and the proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan
(SP-5) at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the
City Council.
J. The City Council has reviewed the findings made in this Resolution and finds that
they are based upon substantial evidence that has been presented to the City Council in the record
of proceedings. The documents, staff reports, and other materials that constitute the record of
proceedings on which this Resolution is based are on file and available for public examination on
the City's website at TemeculaCA.gov. The City Council has independently reviewed and
considered the contents of Addendum No. 1 prior to deciding whether to approve the Specific Plan
Amendment.
Section 2. Further Findings. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the
City Council finds and determines that Addendum No. 1 is the appropriate environmental
document to analyze the proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Specific Plan ("Amendment")
because:
A. Some changes or additions to the Program EIR are necessary, but none of the
conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a
subsequent EIR have occurred.
B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the Amendment that will require
major revisions of the previous Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects;
C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under
which the Amendment are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous Program
EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identified significant effects; and
D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous
Program EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the Amendment will have one or more significant
effects not discussed in the Program EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that
will be substantially more severe than shown in the Program EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures
or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially
2
reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different
from those analyzed in the Program EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects
on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts Addendum No. 1 which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26 h day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 261h day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED
"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO
THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) (LONG RANGE
PROJECT NO. LR20-0209)"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. The Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved by the City Council on
February 22, 1994 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 94-05. Amendment No. 1 to the Old Town
Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on January 23, 1996 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 96-01.
Amendment No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 13, 1997 by the
adoption of Ordinance No. 97-06. Amendment No. 3 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was
approved on July 13, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-12. Amendment No. 4 to the
Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on October 10, 2000 by the adoption of Ordinance
No. 00-11. Amendment No. 5 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on August
24, 2004 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 04-08. Amendment No. 6 to the Old Town Specific
Plan (SP-5) was approved on June 13, 2006 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 06-07.
Amendment No. 7 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 25, 2010 by the
adoption of Ordinance No. 10-09. Amendment No. 8 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was
approved on September 5, 2017 by the adoption of Resolution No. 17-56. The Old Town
Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-8 shall be referred
to in this Resolution as the "Specific Plan".
B. The City Council of the City of Temecula certified the Old Town Specific Plan
Final Program Environmental Impact Report ("FPEIR") on May 11, 2010.
C. Staff initiated Long Range Project No. LR20-0209, a Specific Plan Amendment,
in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law.
E. On May 6, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final
Program Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town
Specific Plan (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and
did address the Planning Commission.
F. After hearing all written and oral testimony by staff and all written comments
from the public on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments received, the
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-11 recommending to the City Council that
the Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report
be approved. Resolution No. 2020-12 is hereby incorporated herein by this reference as if set
forth in full.
G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section
17.16.020, the Planning Commission, in recommending that the City Council approve
Amendment No. 9 to the Specific Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and
Development Code.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City
of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted on page L U-
26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and
identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan
Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Goal 7 of having "A
viable, high -quality Old Town Temecula area that enhances the City economically,
preserves historic structures, and provides civic, cultural, shopping, and meeting and
gathering places for tourists and residents. " The proposed Specific Plan Amendment
also complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific
Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and
Section 17.01.040 (relationship to General Plan) and is consistent with the City of
Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives.
B. The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's
General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the
policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development
within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner
consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations
and the anticipated land use developments.
The Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres, and the subject area of
the Specific Plan Amendment (the Downtown Core district) comprises approximately 48
acres of the Specific Plan. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General
Plan (page L U-32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning
document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all
anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire Specific Plan area has been
reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically
suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan.
D. The proposed specific plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable
character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding
neighborhood.
As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU-30, Old Town
Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that
Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic
development activities. The Old Town Specific Plan was originally adopted to support
and complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the proposed
Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan further supports its downtown character. The
City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the
Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development
trends in the area (L U-40). As such, the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific
Plan provides a means to enhance the area economically while also ensuring the
development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development
in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood.
Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
hereby recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Specific Plan
Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan in substantially the same form as attached
hereto as Exhibit "A."
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 6th day of May, 2020.
FAI
04.
ATTEST:
r<; ( /1,/6-
Luke atson, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020-12 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of May,
2020, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo,
Watts, Youmans
None
None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
X*4-
Luk&-Wafion, Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO
THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) (LONG RANGE
PROJECT NO. LR20-0209)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. The Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved by the City Council on February
22, 1994 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 94-05. Amendment No. 1 to the Old Town Specific
Plan (SP-5) was approved on January 23, 1996 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 96-01.
Amendment No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 13, 1997 by the
adoption of Ordinance No. 97-06. Amendment No. 3 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was
approved on July 13, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-12. Amendment No. 4 to the Old
Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on October 10, 2000 by the adoption of Ordinance No.
00-11. Amendment No. 5 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on August 24, 2004
by the adoption of Ordinance No. 04-08. Amendment No. 6 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-
5) was approved on June 13, 2006 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 06-07. Amendment No. 7 to
the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 25, 2010 by the adoption of Ordinance
No. 10-09. Amendment No. 8 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on September
5, 2017 by the adoption of Resolution No. 17-56. The Old Town Specific Plan as originally
approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-8 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the
"Specific Plan."
B. The City Council of the City of Temecula certified the Old Town Specific Plan
Final Program Environmental Impact Report ("FPEIR") on May 11, 2010.
C. Staff initiated Long Range Project No. LR20-0209, a Specific Plan Amendment, in
a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
D. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment
No. 9 to the Specific Plan would update and modify those standards including an update to allow
four-story hotels within the Downtown Core district and to add language to the Specific Plan to
clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height.
E. On May 6, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No.l to the Old Town Specific Plan Final
Program Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific
Plan (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address
the Planning Commission.
F. After hearing all oral and written testimony from staff and all written testimony
from the public on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments received, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-11 recommending to the City Council that the
Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Final Program Environmental Impact Report be approved. The
Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 2020-12 recommending to the City Council
that the proposed Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) be approved.
G. On May 26, 2020, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project
and Addendum No. 1 to the Final Program Environment Impact Report for the Project at a duly
noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did provide
comments either in support of or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the
testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Addendum No. 1 to the Final
Program Environmental Impact Report prior to and at the public hearing.
H. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-
certifying Addendum No.I to the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Old Town
Specific Plan Amendment.
I. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law.
J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving Amendment No. 9 to the
Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and
Development Code.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of
Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted on page LU-26,
anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies
the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan
Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Goal 7 of having "A
viable, high -quality Old Town Temecula area that enhances the City economically,
preserves historic structures, and provides civic, cultural, shopping, and meeting and
gathering places for tourists and residents." The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also
complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan
amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section
17.01.040 (relationship to General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula
General Plan goals, policies and objectives.
B. The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City s General
Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies,
01
guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old
Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the
public health, safety and welfare.
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations
and the anticipated land use developments.
The Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres, and the subject area of
the Specific Plan Amendment (the Downtown Core district) comprises approximately 48
acres of the Specific Plan. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan
(page LU-32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning
document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all
anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire Specific Plan area has been
reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically
suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan.
D. The proposed specific plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable
character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding
neighborhood.
As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU-30, Old Town
Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that
Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic
development activities. The Old Town Specific Plan was originally adopted to support and
complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the proposed
Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan further support its downtown character. The
City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the
Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development
trends in the area (LU-40). As such, the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific
Plan provides a means to enhance the area economically while also ensuring the
development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development
in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood.
Section 3. Approval of Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5). The City
Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town
Specific Plan (SP-5) in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26 h day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 261h day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning
Commission
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE OF MEETING: May 6, 2020
PREPARED BY: Stuart Fisk, Case Planner
PROJECT Long Range Project Number LR20-0209, an amendment to the Old
SUMMARY: Town Specific Plan to allow four-story hotels within the Downtown
Core district and to add language to the Specific Plan to clarify the
intended use of a Minor Exception for building height
CEQA: Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum; Section 15164
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution recommending City Council adopt a Resolution
adopting an EIR Addendum and adopt a Resolution recommending
that City Council adopt a Resolution amending the Old Town Specific
Plan to allow four-story hotels within the Downtown Core district and
to add language to the Specific Plan to clarify the intended use of a
Minor Exception for building height
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
On May 25, 2010, City Council adopted Ordinance 10-09 to approve a comprehensive amendment
to the Old Town Specific Plan. This Specific Plan Amendment utilized form -based zoning to
establish standards for building placement, building form, and building type to facilitate pedestrian
friendly development, and emphasized implementation of these standards over specific land uses.
While land uses are addressed in the Specific Plan, more emphasis was placed on the form -based
development standards considering that specific uses will come and go over the life of a building,
and if the appropriate types of buildings for a pedestrian oriented downtown were developed within
Old Town, the appropriate types of land uses would also occur.
The 2010 Specific Plan Amendment allows four-story buildings when at least one floor of
residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided. The purpose
for allowing four -stories when at least one floor of residential is provided was to encourage
residential uses within the Downtown Core district, with the intent that the residents would help
to support the commercial businesses within Old Town. The allowance for four-story buildings
when one floor of office (with parking) is provided was made based on community input provided
during the visioning and Specific Plan development process, with the goal of providing additional
options and flexibility for development within Old Town.
The 2010 Specific Plan Program EIR analyzed development of Old Town based on a mixture of
commercial, hotel, residential, civic, and office uses. Based on market absorption projections
developed by Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) for the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment, the
Program EIR assumed an additional 499 hotel rooms (beyond the hotel rooms existing in Old
Town at that time). The 2010 Specific Plan Amendment allows three-story hotels throughout the
Downtown Core district and allows up to eight stories within the Downtown Core -Hotel Overlay
district when a full service hotel with conference facilities, restaurant and other guest services is
provided.
In addition to the four-story buildings currently permitted in the Downtown Core district (for
buildings that provide at least one floor of residential, or at least one floor of office with parking),
the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would also allow four-story hotels in the Downtown Core
district.
ANALYSIS
Since the adoption of the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment, staff has heard from multiple hotel
developers that the ability to construct four story hotels in the Downtown Core is necessary for
new hotels to be economically feasible. Staff has reached out to KMA, who prepared the market
study that guided development of the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment, and received information
validating assertions relating to the economic feasibility of three story versus four story hotels in
the Downtown Core. It should also be noted that no three story hotels have been built in the
Downtown Core district since the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment was adopted.
Considering the intent of the current Specific Plan requirement that four story buildings located
within the Downtown Core district provide at least one floor of residential or one floor of office
use with parking, the primary goal was to provide an incentive for the development of residential
units in Old Town by allowing a fourth floor. With more residents located within Old Town, it
was anticipated that those residents would help support the businesses located in Old Town.
During the development of the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment, property owners seeking the
ability to construct four story buildings that did not include residential units negotiated the
provision for four story buildings that include one floor of office use with parking.
While residents living in Old Town may help support the businesses located in Old Town by
occasionally shopping or dining in Old Town, it is likely that hotel rooms in Old Town would
provide even greater support to Old Town's businesses anticipating that the hotel patrons would
frequently shop and dine in Old Town.
To allow four story hotels in the Downtown Core district, the proposed Old Town Specific Plan
Amendment would modify the requirements in the Specific Plan for multi -story buildings within
the Downtown Core district. As stated above, the current Specific Plan (Section IV.B.2.a) requires
four story buildings to provide at least one floor of residential or one floor of office use with
parking. The Downtown Core Hotel Overlay Zone, located within the Downtown Core zoning
designation, allows up to eight stories and does not require residential or office to be included in
hotels. The existing OTSP allows for up to 499 hotel rooms within the Downtown Core and
N
Residential/Limited Mixed -Use Districts, based on a market study that supported the 2010 Specific
Plan Amendment and Program EIR. Of those 499 allowable hotel rooms, 343 hotel rooms have
already either been constructed or approved, leaving a balance of 156 hotel rooms analyzed in the
2010 Program EIR. Projects that exceed 499 total hotel rooms will be required to prepare
additional CEQA documentation.
In addition, to clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height, the proposed Old
Town Specific Plan Amendment would add footnotes to Table IV-8 (Allowable Building Types
and Height in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District), Table IV-17
(Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the Residential/Limited Mixed -Use District),
and Table IV-28 (Allowable Building Types and Building Heights in the Neighborhood
Residential District) of the Specific Plan to state that "Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula
Municipal Code, which provides criteria for Minor Exceptions to development regulations, may
be utilized for building height in Old Town for the purpose of providing architectural elements to
a portion (or portions) of a building to add roofline variation or to otherwise enhance the aesthetics
of the building consistent with its architectural style. A Minor Exception is not intended to be
utilized to add overall height to the base roof line of the building nor to add extra floor to ceiling
height of any one or more stories."
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the SD Union Tribune on April 23, 2020 and mailed
to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), staff has reviewed and
considered the Final Program Environmental Impact Report ("FPEIR") for the 2010 Old Town
Specific Plan Amendment certified by the City Council on May 11, 2010, including the impacts
and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the proposed Specific Plan
Amendment does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or
Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA
Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes
proposed by the Amendment that will require major revisions of the previous Program EIR due to
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity
of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to
the circumstances under which the Amendment are undertaken that will require major revisions of
the previous Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new
information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with
the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous Program EIR was adopted, showing
that: (a) the Amendment will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Program
EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe
than shown in the Program EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found
not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d)
mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the
Program EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but
the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment to allow four-story hotels in the Downtown Core district
of the Old Town Specific Plan and to add language to clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception
for building height has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted 2010 Program
EIR and an EIR Addendum is the appropriate CEQA action for the proposed Specific Plan
Amendment pursuant to CEQA Section 15164.
FINDINGS
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development
Code.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of
Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted on page LU-26,
anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old
Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent
with the General Plan Land Use Element Goal 7 of having "A viable, high -quality Old Town
Temecula area that enhances the City economically, preserves historic structures, and provides
civic, cultural, shopping, and meeting and gathering places for tourists and residents ". The
proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code
Standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to
approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to General Plan) and is consistent with the
City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City.
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City s General Plan
and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old Town Specific Plan
area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and
welfare.
The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the
anticipated land use developments.
The Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres, and the subject area of the
Specific Plan Amendment (the Downtown Core district) comprises approximately 48 acres of the
Specific Plan. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (page LU-32), the
purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that
a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such,
the entire Specific Plan area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out
potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old
Town Specific Plan.
4
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which
will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
As identified within the City s General Plan Land Use Element, page L U-30, Old Town Temecula
is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains
a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic development activities. The Old Town
Specific Plan was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of
Temecula's downtown and the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan further
supports its downtown character. The City s General Plan Land Use Element states that the City
will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to
respond to development trends in the area (LU-40). As such, the proposed Amendment to the Old
Town Specific Plan provides a means to enhance the area economically while also ensuring the
development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old
Town and the surrounding neighborhood.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Aerial Map
2. Draft PC Resolution — EIR Addendum
Exhibit A — Draft City Council Resolution
Exhibit A — EIR Addendum
3. Draft PC Resolution — Specific Plan Amendment
Exhibit A — Draft City Council Resolution
Exhibit A - Specific Plan Amendment
(Underline/Strikeout)
4. Old Town Specific Plan Program EIR
5. Notice of Public Hearing
6. Draft Notice of Determination with County Clerk
Notice of Public Hearin
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below.
Case No.: Long Range Planning Project No. LR20-0209
Applicant: City of Temecula
Location: The Old Town Specific Plan area, generally located between Rancho California Road and First Street
from north to south, and between Interstate 15 and an area approximately 200 feet west of Pujol Street from east to
west.
Proposal: An amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to allow four-story hotels within the Downtown Core
district and to add language to the Specific Plan to clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height.
Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
Specific Plan amendment will not have a significant impact upon the environment based on a completed EIR
Addendum. As a result, the City Council will take action on a recommendation to adopt an EIR Addendum in
compliance with CEQA Section 15164
PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means
consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19
pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on
television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
DATE OF HEARING: May 26, 2020 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 PM
Project Site
jL
DR
all
AM I'm A1411pisoll
Due to the closure of the library and other city buildings and facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the agenda
packet is only viewable on the City's website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. To view the
proposed project application or questions concerning the project(s), please contact Stuart Fisk at (951) 506-5159.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and
controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or
proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council,
shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or
prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this City Council meeting, please
submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be
submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Electronic comments on agenda items for this City
Council meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.)
will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not
exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers
at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Council meeting.
Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.
Gty of �Temecula
Community Development
41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590
Phone (951 ) 694-6400 • Fax (951 ) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov
May 27, 2020
Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson
Supervising Legal Certification Clerk
County of Riverside
Post Office Box 751
Riverside, CA 92501-0751
SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application LR20-0209, a Specific Plan
Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to allow four-story hotels within
the Downtown Core district and to add language to the Specific Plan to
clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height.
Dear Ms. Anderson
Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant
to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $50.00 County
Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. The City of Temecula is
paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee
has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public
Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled
to receive a $25.00 filing fee.
Please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the
30 day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stuart Fisk at (951) 506-
5159.
Sincerely,
Luke Watson
Director of Community Development
Enclosures: Check
Copies of this letter (3)
Self addressed stamped envelopes (2)
C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@5COE21 F3\@BCL@5COE21 F3.doc
City of Temecula
Community Development
Planning Division Notice of Determination
TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division
County of Riverside City of Temecula
P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street
Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the
Public Resources Code
State Clearinghouse No.: 2009071049
Project Title: Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 9
Project Location: The Old Town Specific Plan area, generally located between Rancho
California Road and First Street from north to south, and between
Interstate 15 and an area approximately 200 feet west of Pujol Street
from east to west.
Project Description: An amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to allow four-story hotels
within the Downtown Core district and to add language to the Specific
Plan to clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height.
Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside
Contact Person: Stuart Fisk Telephone Number: (951) 506-5159
This is to advise you that the City Council for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project
on May 26, 2020 and has made the following determinations regarding this project:
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. That an Environmental Impact Report Addendum was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project.
4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was originally adopted for this project and has been
refined.
5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project.
6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments, responses, and record of project approval is
available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590.
Signature:
Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office:
Date:
PA19-0408 @BCL@5C0E21F3
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION
De Minimus Impact Finding
Project Proponent: City of Temecula
Project Title: Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 9
Location: The Old Town Specific Plan area, generally located between Rancho
California Road and First Street from north to south, and between
Interstate 15 and an area approximately 200 feet west of Pujol Street
from east to west.
Project Description: An amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to allow four-story hotels
within the Downtown Core district and to add language to the Specific
Plan to clarify the intended use of a Minor Exception for building height.
Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary):
The Project consists of an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to allow four-story hotels within
the Downtown Core district and to add language to the Specific Plan to clarify the intended use of a
Minor Exception for building height.
2. An EIR Addendum was prepared to evaluate the potential for adverse environmental impacts
associated which could result from this project.
3. The EIR Addendum indicated that no impacts would occur to fish and wildlife resources as a result of
the project and recommended that an EIR Addendum be adopted for this project. (No wildlife related
mitigation measures were required for this project.)
4. The City Council for the City of Temecula adopted an EIR Addendum for this project based upon the
information contained in the EIR Addendum on May 26, 2020.
Certification:
I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of
the Fish and Game Code.
Luke Watson
Director of Community Development
Date
PA19-0408 @BCL@5COE21F3
Item No. 18
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Introduce an Ordinance to Amend Chapter 17.21 Affordable Housing Overlay
Zone of the Temecula Municipal Code (Long Range Project No. LR20-0279)
PREPARED BY: Dale West, Associate Planner II
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance
entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.21
REGARDING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY
ZONE, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(B)(3)
SUMMARY OF
ORDINANCE: The proposed ordinance would amend the timing for the submittal of the
Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement, add the requirements that affordable housing units must
be constructed concurrently with, or prior to, market rate housing units, and add that affordable
housing units be dispersed throughout the development project.
BACKGROUND: The Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District (AHOZ) was adopted by
the City Council on September 5, 2018. The adoption of the AHOZ implemented Program 1 of
the City's 2014-2021 Housing Element, and is intended to encourage the development of
affordable housing in the City in order to meet the City's Regional Housing Need Assessment
(RHNA). The AHOZ establishes an overlay zone on 44 parcels within the City. Parcels within
the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone may be developed using the underlying zoning designation,
or as an affordable housing project under the Affordable Housing Overlay, thus providing
additional development opportunities to property owners whose properties are located within the
overlay zone. If a site is developed as an affordable housing project within the AHOZ, at least 20
percent of the residential units in each project are to be reserved for households earning no greater
than 80 percent of the area median income (AMI), adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit.
For mixed -use affordable housing projects in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area, residential
uses shall occupy at least 50 percent of the total floor area of the mixed -use project.
A project seeking to develop under the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone is only subject to
administrative review, and is not subject to any discretionary review. As such, staff is only
permitted to review the project to determine if it complies with the requirements set forth in
Chapter 17.21 of the Temecula Municipal Code. These requirements include ensuring that the
project complies with the following: Development Code standards, Specific Plan standards,
Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with Pechanga, Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan, Building and Fire Codes, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Development
Impact Fees, Water Quality Management Plan, and certain dedication of improvements (if
applicable). The Development Code standards address such requirements as height limits,
setbacks, lot coverage, and parking.
The proposed ordinance would amend the timing for the submittal of the Cultural Resources
Treatment Agreement by clarifying that it must be submitted "prior to the approval of the
Administrative Review Application," as opposed to "before the issuance of the Administrative
Review Application." The proposed change is necessary, not only to protect the cultural resources
in the area, but to also ensure that the Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement appropriately
reflects any changes to the project that may occur during the processing of the application.
The proposed ordinance also adds the requirements that affordable housing units must be
constructed concurrently with, or prior to, market rate housing units, and dispersed throughout the
development project. These revisions are necessary to ensure that affordable housing is actually
constructed by project proponents that seek to develop using the Affordable Housing Overlay
Zone.
On April 22, 2020, the Planning Commission considered the draft ordinance at a public hearing
and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-09, recommending the City Council
adopt the proposed ordinance, amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code regarding the
Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance
2. April 22, 2020 Planning Commission Staff Report
3. Planning Commission Resolution 2020-09
4. Notice of Public Hearing
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER
17.21 REGARDING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
OVERLAY ZONE, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION
THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM
FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine, and declare that:
A. The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance, including the environmental
analysis, on April 22, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time
the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or
opposition to this matter.
B. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-09, recommending
approval of the Ordinance by the City Council.
C. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance, including the
environmental analysis, on May 26, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law,
at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or opposition to this matter.
D. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of
information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council.
Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula in
approving the proposed Municipal Code amendment in Long Range Planning Project Number
LR20-0279 hereby makes the following findings:
A. The State Legislature has declared that the lack of housing, including providing for
a variety of housing types for all income levels and special needs groups, is a critical problem that
threatens the economic, environmental, and social quality of life in California.
B. Government Code Section 65583 requires that the City's Housing Element address
governmental constraints to the development of housing, including providing for a variety of
housing types for all income levels. The City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's
2014-2021 Housing Element on January 28, 2014. The City's Housing Element identified the
need to amend the City's Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone to
encourage the development of affordable housing in the City. On September 25, 2018, the City
Council adopted an ordinance establishing the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
C. Staff has now determined that the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance
should be amended to clarify (1) a cultural resources agreement must be entered into with the
Pechanga tribe before the Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit,
and (2) that affordable units must be constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate units,
and must be dispersed throughout the development project. These revisions are necessary to not
only protect the cultural resources in the area, but also to ensure that affordable housing is actually
constructed by project proponents that seek to develop projects using the overlay zone.
D. The proposed amendments to the affordable housing overlay zone ordinance are in
conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of elements of the General Plan.
The Ordinance implements the following policies contained in the City's Housing Element:
Policy 1. 1: Provide an inventory of land at varying densities sufficient
to accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City;
2. Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of
housing types in terms of cost, density, and type, and presents the
opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by
balancing jobs and housing types;
3. Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that
accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population, and provide
opportunities to meet Temecula's fair share of extremely low-, very low-,
low-, and moderate -income housing;
4. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private, and nonprofit efforts in
the development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs
groups;
5. Policy 3.1 Expedite processing procedures and fees for new
construction or rehabilitation of housing; and
6. Policy 5.2: Support efforts to ensure that all income segments of the
community have unrestricted access to appropriate housing.
Furthermore, the Ordinance implements the following goals and policies contained in the City's
General Plan Land Use Element:
7. Goal 1: A diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, public and open space land uses.
8. Policy 1.6: Encourage flexible zoning techniques in appropriate locations
to encourage mixed use development, preserve natural features, achieve
innovative site design, achieve a range of transition of densities, provide
open space and recreation facilities, and/or provide necessary amenities and
facilities.
E. The proposed amendments to the Municipal Code are consistent with the General
Plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. Residential development approved pursuant
to Chapter 17.21 complies with the requirements included in the City's General Plan Housing
Element.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby
makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the proposed Ordinance:
A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code
Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA")), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of
Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000, et seq.), the proposed Ordinance falls within the scope of
the environmental analysis conducted for the City's 2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the Uptown
Temecula Specific Plan.
B. On January 28, 2014, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the approval of the
2014 — 2021 Housing Element, which analyzed the potential impacts and determined that less than
significant impacts would result from the adoption of the 2014 — 2021 Housing Element. In 2019,
the City adopted the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone which was described in the City's Housing
Element. On November 17, 2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012)
was certified in connection with the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The
Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance applied the affordable housing overlay zone to
certain parcels located in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
C. The proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance do
not increase the number of properties that are located within the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone,
or change the zoning designation of any of the properties within this overlay zone. Instead, the
ordinance merely clarifies that (1) a cultural resources agreement must be entered into with the
Pechanga tribe before the Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit,
(2) that affordable units must be constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate units, and
(3) that the affordable units must be dispersed throughout the development project. As such, the
environmental impacts for the Project have been evaluated by the previously adopted Negative
Declaration for the Housing Element, and the EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no
further environmental review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines
Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation
is necessary.
D. In addition, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone will have a significant effect on
the environment, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section
15061(b)(3). Staff is hereby directed to file a Notice of Exemption.
Section 4. Subsection A of Section 17.21.040 (Compliance with Laws) of Chapter
17.21 (Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section
17.21.040 remaining unchanged:
"A. The applicant shall enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the
Pechanga Tribe, and provide a copy of this agreement to the City before the Director
approves the Administrative Review Application. This Agreement shall address the
following:
Treatment and disposition of cultural resources;
2. The designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional
Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing
activities;
3. Project grading and development scheduling;
4. Terms of compensation for the Pechange Tribal monitors;
5. Treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and
human remains discovered onsite;
6. Pechanga Tribal monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading in order to
evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the
property, and to make recommendations as to treatment;
7. The applicant's agreement to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources,
including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to
the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition; and
8. The applicant's agreement that all Pechanga Tribal sacred sites are to be
avoided and preserved."
Section 5. Subsection D of Section 17.21.060 (Regulations and Development
Standards.) of Chapter 17.21 (Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District) of Title 17 (Zoning)
of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, with all other provisions
of Section 17.21.060 remaining unchanged:
"D. At least 20 percent of the residential units of each building developed pursuant to
this Chapter 17.21 shall be reserved for households earning no greater than 80 percent of
area median income adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit. The units shall be sold
or rented at an affordable housing cost or affordable rent, as those terms are defined in
Sections 50052.5 and 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code. If the units are
rental units, the affordable units shall be deed -restricted for a period of not less than fifty-
five (55) years. If the units are for -sale units, the units shall be sold in accordance with
California Government Code Section 65915.
For any project that is developed pursuant to this Chapter 17.21, the affordable units must
be constructed concurrently with or prior to the construction of any market rate units. In
addition, the affordable units must be integrated with the market rate units so that there is
a mix of affordable and market rate units, if any, in each building of the development
project."
Section 6. Sections 4 and 5 of this Ordinance shall not apply to any project that has
submitted an application that has been deemed complete by the City prior to April 22, 2020.
Section 7. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any
preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain
valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each
section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s)
may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation.
Section 8. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and
posted in the manner required by law.
Section 9. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day
of , 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 2020- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Temecula on the 26th day of May, 2020, and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the
day of , 2020, the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning
Commission
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE OF MEETING: April 22, 2020
PREPARED BY: Dale West, Case Planner
APPLICANT NAME: City of Temecula
PROJECT Long Range Project Number LR20-0279, an amendment to Chapter
SUMMARY: 17.21 Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District to clarify timing of
the required Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement and to require
affordable housing units to be constructed concurrently with market
rate housing units and integrated among market rate units.
CEQA: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public
Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA")), and the State
CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections
15000, et seq.), the proposed Ordinance is exempt from CEQA
because it falls within the scope of the environmental analysis
conducted for the City's 2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the
Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. Additionally, because it can be seen
with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendments
to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone will have a significant effect
on the environment, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to
CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3)
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula adopt a
resolution recommending that the City Council of the City of Temecula
adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 17.21 of Title 17 of the Temecula
Municipal Code, Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District (AHOZ) was adopted by the Temecula City
Council on September 5, 2018. The adoption of the AHOZ implemented Program 1 of the City's
2014-2021 Housing Element, and is intended to encourage the development of affordable housing
in the City in order to meet the City's Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA). The AHOZ
establishes an overlay zone on 44 parcels within the City. Parcels within the Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone may be developed using the underlying zoning designation, or as an affordable
housing project under the Affordable Housing Overlay, thus providing additional development
opportunities to property owners whose properties are located within the overlay zone. If a site is
developed as an affordable housing project, at least 20 percent of the residential units in each
project are to be reserved for households earning no greater than 80 percent of the area median
income adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit. For mixed -use affordable housing projects
in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area, residential uses shall occupy at least 50 percent of
the total floor area of the mixed -use project.
A project seeking to develop under the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone is only subject to
administrative review, and is not subject to any discretionary review. As such, staff is only
permitted to review the project to determine if it complies with the requirements set forth in
Chapter 17.21 of the Temecula Municipal Code. These requirements include ensuring that the
project complies with the following: Development Code standards, Specific Plan standards,
Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with Pechanga, Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan, Building and Fire Codes, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Development
Impact Fees, Water Quality Management Plan, and certain dedication of improvements (if
applicable). The Development Code standards address such things as height limits, setbacks, lot
coverage, and parking.
As a result of Staff s review and application of the ordinance, staff has determined there is a need
to amend the AHOZ affecting the timing of the submittal of the Cultural Resources Treatment
Agreement, and the timing of the construction and distribution of affordable housing units on a
development site.
ANALYSIS
The proposed ordinance would amend the timing for the submittal of the Cultural Resources
Treatment Agreement by clarifying that it must be submitted "prior to the approval of the
Administrative Review Application," as opposed to "before the issuance of the Administrative
Review Application." The proposed change is necessary, not only to protect the cultural resources
in the area, but it will also ensure that the Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement appropriately
reflects any changes to the project that may occur during the processing of the application.
The proposed ordinance also adds the requirements that affordable housing units must be
constructed concurrently with, or prior to, market rate housing units, and dispersed throughout the
development project. These revisions are necessary to ensure that affordable housing is actually
constructed by project proponents that seek to develop projects using the overlay zone.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the SD Union Tribune on March 5, 2020, and on
April 9, 2020.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections
21000, et seq. ("CEQA")), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title
14, Sections 15000, et seq.), the proposed Ordinance falls within the scope of the environmental
analysis conducted for the City's 2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the Uptown Temecula
2
Specific Plan. Additionally, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that
the proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone will have a significant effect
on the environment, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section
15061(b)(3).
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution
2. Exhibit A - Draft City Council Ordinance
3. Notice of Public Hearing
PC RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED, "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.21
REGARDING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY
ZONE, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(B)(3)"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On March 18, 2020, the Planning Commission identified a need to amend the
adopted Municipal Code to amend Chapter 17.21 of the Temecula Municipal Code regarding the
Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District (Long Range Project No. LR20-0279).
B. The Ordinance was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the application and
environmental review on March 18, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Long
Range Project No. LR20-0279 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending that the
City Council approve the Ordinance hereby finds, determines and declares as required by Section
17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code, that the Ordinance
is consistent with the General Plan as follows:
A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The Ordinance
implements the following policies contained in the City's Housing Element:
a. Policy 1.1: Provide an inventory of land at varying densities sufficient to
accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City;
b. Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of housing
types in terms of cost, density, and type, and presents the opportunity for local
residents to live and work in the same community by balancing jobs and housing
types;
c. Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the
needs of all income levels of the population, and provide opportunities to meet
Temecula's fair share of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income
housing;
d. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the
development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs groups;
e. Policy 3.1 Expedite processing procedures and fees for new construction or
rehabilitation of housing; and
f. Policy 5.2: Support efforts to ensure that all income segments of the community
have unrestricted access to appropriate housing.
Furthermore, the Ordinance implements the following goals and policies contained in the City's
General Plan Land Use Element:
g. Goal 1: A diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, public and open space land uses.
h. Policy 1.6: Encourage flexible zoning techniques in appropriate locations to
encourage mixed use development, preserve natural features, achieve innovative
site design, achieve a range of transition of densities, provide
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A. Pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA")), and the
State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000, et seq.), the
proposed Ordinance falls within the scope of the environmental analysis conducted for the City's
2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
A. On January 28, 2014, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the approval of the
2014 — 2021 Housing Element, which analyzed the potential impacts and
determined that less than significant impacts would result from the adoption of the
2014 — 2021 Housing Element. In 2019, the City adopted the Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone which was described in the City's Housing Element. On November
17, 2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012) was
certified in connection with the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
The Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance applied the affordable housing
overlay zone to certain parcels located in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
B. The proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance do
not increase the number of properties that are located within the Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone, or change the zoning designation of any of the properties
within this overlay zone. Instead, the ordinance merely clarifies that (1) a cultural
resources agreement must be entered into with the Pechanga tribe before the
Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit, (2) that
affordable units must be constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate
units, and (3) that the affordable units must be dispersed throughout the
development project. As such, the environmental impacts for the Project have been
evaluated by the previously adopted Negative Declaration for the Housing Element,
and the EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no further environmental
review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation
is necessary.
C. In addition, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone will have a
significant effect on the environment, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3). Staff is hereby directed to file a Notice
of Exemption.
Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council adopt the Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 22nd day of April 2020.
Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Luke Watson
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22th day of April
2020, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Luke Watson
Secretary
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER
17.21 REGARDING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
OVERLAY ZONE, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION
THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM
FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine, and declare that:
A. The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance, including the environmental
analysis, on March 18, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time
the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or
opposition to this matter.
B. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-, recommending
approval of the Ordinance by the City Council.
C. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance, including the
environmental analysis, on 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed
by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or opposition to this matter.
D. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of
information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council.
Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula in
approving the proposed Municipal Code amendment in Long Range Planning Project Number
LR20-0279 hereby makes the following findings:
A. The State Legislature has declared that the lack of housing, including providing for
a variety of housing types for all income levels and special needs groups, is a critical problem that
threatens the economic, environmental, and social quality of life in California.
B. Government Code Section 65583 requires that the City's Housing Element address
governmental constraints to the development of housing, including providing for a variety of
housing types for all income levels. The City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's
2014-2021 Housing Element on January 28, 2014. The City's Housing Element identified the
need to amend the City's Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone to
encourage the development of affordable housing in the City. On September 25, 2018, the City
Council adopted an ordinance establishing the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
C. Staff has now determined that the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance
should be amended to clarify (1) a cultural resources agreement must be entered into with the
Pechanga tribe before the Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit,
and (2) that affordable units must be constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate units,
and must be dispersed throughout the development project. These revisions are necessary to not
only protect the cultural resources in the area, but also to ensure that affordable housing is actually
constructed by project proponents that seek to develop projects using the overlay zone.
D. The proposed amendments to the affordable housing overlay zone ordinance are in
conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of elements of the General Plan.
The Ordinance implements the following policies contained in the City's Housing Element:
Policy 1. 1: Provide an inventory of land at varying densities sufficient
to accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City;
2. Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of
housing types in terms of cost, density, and type, and presents the
opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by
balancing jobs and housing types;
3. Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that
accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population, and provide
opportunities to meet Temecula's fair share of extremely low-, very low-,
low-, and moderate -income housing;
4. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private, and nonprofit efforts in
the development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs
groups;
5. Policy 3.1 Expedite processing procedures and fees for new
construction or rehabilitation of housing; and
6. Policy 5.2: Support efforts to ensure that all income segments of the
community have unrestricted access to appropriate housing.
Furthermore, the Ordinance implements the following goals and policies contained in the City's
General Plan Land Use Element:
7. Goal 1: A diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, public and open space land uses.
8. Policy 1.6: Encourage flexible zoning techniques in appropriate locations
to encourage mixed use development, preserve natural features, achieve
innovative site design, achieve a range of transition of densities, provide
open space and recreation facilities, and/or provide necessary amenities and
facilities.
E. The proposed amendments to the Municipal Code are consistent with the General
Plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. Residential development approved pursuant
to Chapter 17.21 complies with the requirements included in the City's General Plan Housing
Element.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby
makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the proposed Ordinance:
A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code
Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA")), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of
Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000, et seq.), the proposed Ordinance falls within the scope of
the environmental analysis conducted for the City's 2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the Uptown
Temecula Specific Plan.
B. On January 28, 2014, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the approval of the
2014 — 2021 Housing Element, which analyzed the potential impacts and determined that less than
significant impacts would result from the adoption of the 2014 — 2021 Housing Element. In 2019,
the City adopted the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone which was described in the City's Housing
Element. On November 17, 2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012)
was certified in connection with the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The
Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance applied the affordable housing overlay zone to
certain parcels located in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
C. The proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance do
not increase the number of properties that are located within the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone,
or change the zoning designation of any of the properties within this overlay zone. Instead, the
ordinance merely clarifies that (1) a cultural resources agreement must be entered into with the
Pechanga tribe before the Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit,
(2) that affordable units must be constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate units, and
(3) that the affordable units must be dispersed throughout the development project. As such, the
environmental impacts for the Project have been evaluated by the previously adopted Negative
Declaration for the Housing Element, and the EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no
further environmental review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines
Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation
is necessary.
D. In addition, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone will have a significant effect on
the environment, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section
15061(b)(3). Staff is hereby directed to file a Notice of Exemption.
Section 4. Subsection A of Section 17.21.040 (Compliance with Laws) of Chapter
17.21 (Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section
17.21.040 remaining unchanged:
"A. The applicant shall enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the
Pechanga Tribe, and provide a copy of this agreement to the City before the Director approves the
Administrative Review Application. This Agreement shall address the following:
Treatment and disposition of cultural resources;
2. The designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional
Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing
activities;
3. Project grading and development scheduling;
4. Terms of compensation for the Pechange Tribal monitors;
5. Treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and
human remains discovered onsite;
6. Pechanga Tribal monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading in order to
evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the
property, and to make recommendations as to treatment;
7. The applicant's agreement to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources,
including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to
the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition; and
8. The applicant's agreement that all Pechanga Tribal sacred sites are to be
avoided and preserved."
Section 5. Subsection D of Section 17.21.060 (Regulations and Development
Standards.) of Chapter 17.21 (Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District) of Title 17 (Zoning)
of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, with all other provisions
of Section 17.21.060 remaining unchanged:
"D. At least 20 percent of the residential units of each building developed pursuant to this
Chapter 17.21 shall be reserved for households earning no greater than 80 percent of area median
income adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit. The units shall be sold or rented at an
affordable housing cost or affordable rent, as those terms are defined in Sections 50052.5 and
50053 of the California Health and Safety Code. If the units are rental units, the affordable units
shall be deed -restricted for a period of not less than fifty-five (55) years. If the units are for -sale
units, the units shall be sold in accordance with California Government Code Section 65915.
For any project that is developed pursuant to this Chapter 17.21, the affordable units must be
constructed concurrently with or prior to the construction of any market rate units. In addition, the
affordable units must be integrated with the market rate units so that there is a mix of affordable
and market rate units, if any, in each building of the development project."
Section 5. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any
preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain
valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each
section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s)
may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation.
Section 6. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and
posted in the manner required by law.
Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day
of , 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 2020- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 2020, and that thereafter,
said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof
held on the day of , 2020, the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: [ ]
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: [ ]
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: [ ]
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: [ ]
Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula
PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
CASE NO: LR20-0279 APPLICANT: City of Temecula
PROPOSAL: An amendment to Chapter 17.21 of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code clarifying
the timing of submittal of the Cultural Treatment Agreement, and the construction timing and distribution of
affordable housing units within a project.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula adopt a resolution
recommending that the City Council of the City of Temecula adopt an amendment to Chapter 17.21
(Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District) of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code
Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA")), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14,
Sections 15000, et seq.), the proposed Ordinance falls within the scope of the environmental analysis
conducted for the City's 2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. On January
28, 2014, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the approval of the 2014 — 2021 Housing Element, which
analyzed the potential impacts and determined that less than significant impacts would result from the adoption
of the 2014 — 2021 Housing Element. In 2019, the City adopted the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone which
implemented Program 1 in the City's Housing Element. On November 17, 2015, an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012) was certified in connection with the approval of the Uptown Temecula
Specific Plan. The Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance applied the affordable housing overlay zone
to certain parcels located in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
This Ordinance does not increase the number of properties that are located within the Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone, or change the zoning designation of any of the properties within this overlay zone. Instead, it
merely clarifies that (1) a cultural resources agreement must be entered into with the Pechanga tribe before the
Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit, and (2) that affordable units must be
constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate units, and must be dispersed throughout the development
project. As such, the environmental impacts for the Project have been evaluated by the previously adopted
Negative Declaration for the Housing Element and the EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no
further environmental review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation is necessary.
In addition, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendments to
the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone will have a significant effect on the environment, the project is exempt
from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3).
CASE PLANNER: Dale West, (951) 693-3918
DATE OF HEARING: April 22, 2020 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 p.m.
PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means
consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020,
regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed
on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In
accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting
on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing on the City's
website — TemeculaCA.gov after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. Due to the
closure of the Library and other City Buildings and Facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the complete
agenda is only viewable on the City website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. For more
information or have questions regarding this project, please contact Dale West (951) 693-3918.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by,
and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or
proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning
Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the
City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the April 22, 2020 Planning
Commission meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the Principal
Management Analyst. Email comments must be submitted to Lynn Lehner at lynn.lehner@temeculaca.gov.
Electronic comments on agenda items for the April 22, 2020 Planning Commission meeting may only be
submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The Principal Management Analyst shall read all email comments, provided that
the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide,
consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Planning Commission meeting. The email comments submitted
shall become part of the record of the Planning Commission meeting.
Questions? Please call the Case Planner Dale West (951) 693-3918 or the Community Development Department
at (951) 694-6400.
PC RESOLUTION NO.2020-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED, "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.21
REGARDING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY
ZONE, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(B)(3)"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On March 18, 2020, the Planning Commission identified a need to amend the
adopted Municipal Code to amend Chapter 17.21 of the Temecula Municipal Code regarding the
Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District (Long Range Project No. LR20-0279).
B. The Ordinance was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the application and
environmental review on March 18, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Long
Range Project No. LR20-0279 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending that the
City Council approve the Ordinance hereby finds, determines and declares as required by Section
17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code, that the Ordinance
is consistent with the General Plan as follows:
A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The Ordinance
implements the following policies contained in the City's Housing Element:
a. Policy 1.1: Provide an inventory of land at varying densities sufficient to
accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City;
b. Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of housing
types in terms of cost, density, and type, and presents the opportunity for local
residents to live and work in the same community by balancing jobs and housing
types;
Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the
needs of all income levels of the population, and provide opportunities to meet
Temecula's fair share of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income
housing;
d. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private, and nonprofit efforts in the
development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs groups;
e. Policy 3.1 Expedite processing procedures and fees for new construction or
rehabilitation of housing; and
f. Policy 5.2: Support efforts to ensure that all income segments of the community
have unrestricted access to appropriate housing.
Furthermore, the Ordinance implements the following goals and policies contained in the City's
General Plan Land Use Element:
g. Goal 1: A diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, public and open space land uses.
h. Policy 1.6: Encourage flexible zoning techniques in appropriate locations to
encourage mixed use development, preserve natural features, achieve innovative
site design, achieve a range of transition of densities, provide
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A. Pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA")), and the
State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000, et seq.), the
proposed Ordinance falls within the scope of the environmental analysis conducted for the City's
2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
A. On January 28, 2014, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the approval of the
2014 — 2021 Housing Element, which analyzed the potential impacts and
determined that less than significant impacts would result from the adoption of the
2014 — 2021 Housing Element. In 2019, the City adopted the Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone which was described in the City's Housing Element. On November
17, 2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012) was
certified in connection with the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
The Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance applied the affordable housing
overlay zone to certain parcels located in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, Area.
B. The proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance do
not increase the number of properties that are located within the Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone, or change the zoning designation of any of the properties
within this overlay zone. Instead, the ordinance merely clarifies that (1) a cultural
resources agreement must be entered into with the Pechanga tribe before the
Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit, (2) that
affordable units must be constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate
units, and (3) that the affordable units must be dispersed throughout the
development project. As such, the environmental impacts for the Project have been
evaluated by the previously adopted Negative Declaration for the Housing Element,
and the EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no further environmental
review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162
exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation
is necessary.
C. In addition, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone will have a
significant effect on the environment, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3). Staff is hereby directed to file a Notice
of Exemption.
Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council adopt the Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 22nd day of April 2020.
Wf�q, FA
f Tref
ATTEyST.
L«ke Watson
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020-09 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22th day of April
2020, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo,
Watts, Youmans
NOES:
0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
None
ABSTAIN:
0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
2a Ild—
Luke Watson
Secretary
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER
17.21 REGARDING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
OVERLAY ZONE, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION
THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM
FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine, and declare that:
A. The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance, including the environmental
analysis, on March 18, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City
Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or opposition to this
matter.
B. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-09, recommending approval of the
Ordinance by the City Council.
C. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance, including the
environmental analysis, on 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by
law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or opposition to this matter.
D. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of information
received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council.
Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula in
approving the proposed Municipal Code amendment in Long Range Planning Project Number
LR20-0279 hereby makes the following findings:
A. The State Legislature has declared that the lack of housing, including providing for a
variety of housing types for all income levels and special needs groups, is a critical problem that threatens
the economic, environmental, and social quality of life in California.
B. Government Code Section 65583 requires that the City's Housing Element address
governmental constraints to the development of housing, including providing for a variety of housing
types for all income levels. The City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's 2014-2021
Housing Element on January 28, 2014. The City's Housing Element identified the need to amend the
City's Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone to encourage the development
of affordable housing in the City. On September 25, 2018, the City Council adopted an ordinance
establishing the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
C. Staff has now determined that the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance should be
amended to clarify (1) a cultural resources agreement must be entered into with the Pechanga tribe before
the Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit, and (2) that affordable units
must be constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate units, and must be dispersed throughout
the development project. These revisions are necessary to not only protect the cultural resources in the
area, but also to ensure that affordable housing is actually constructed by project proponents that seek to
develop projects using the overlay zone.
D. The proposed amendments to the affordable housing overlay zone ordinance are in
conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of elements of the General Plan. The
Ordinance implements the following policies contained in the City's Housing Element:
Policy 1. 1: Provide an inventory of land at varying densities sufficient
to accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City;
2. Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of
housing types in terms of cost, density, and type, and presents the
opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by
balancing jobs and housing types;
Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that
accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population, and provide
opportunities to meet Temecula's fair share of extremely low-, very low-,
low-, and moderate -income housing;
4. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private, and nonprofit efforts in
the development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs
groups;
5. Policy 3.1 Expedite processing procedures and fees for new
construction or rehabilitation of housing; and
6. Policy 5.2: Support efforts to ensure that all income segments of the
community have unrestricted access to appropriate housing.
Furthermore, the Ordinance implements the following goals and policies contained in the City's
General Plan Land Use Element:
7. Goal 1: A diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, public and open space land uses.
Policy 1.6: Encourage flexible zoning techniques in appropriate locations
to encourage mixed use development, preserve natural features, achieve
innovative site design, achieve a range of transition of densities, provide
open space and recreation facilities, and/or provide necessary amenities and
facilities.
E. The proposed amendments to the Municipal Code are consistent with the General Plan and
all applicable provisions contained therein. Residential development approved pursuant to Chapter 17.21
complies with the requirements included in the City's General Plan Housing Element.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby
makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the proposed Ordinance:
A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections
21000, et seq. ("CEQA")), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14,
Sections 15000, et seq.), the proposed Ordinance falls within the scope of the environmental analysis
conducted for the City's 2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan.
B. On January 28, 2014, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the approval of the 2014 —
2021 Housing Element, which analyzed the potential impacts and determined that less than significant
impacts would result from the adoption of the 2014 — 2021 Housing Element. In 2019, the City adopted
the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone which was described in the City's Housing Element. On November
17, 2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012) was certified in connection with
the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance
applied the affordable housing overlay zone to certain parcels located in the Uptown Temecula Specific
Plan Area.
C. The proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance do not
increase the number of properties that are located within the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, or change
the zoning designation of any of the properties within this overlay zone. Instead, the ordinance merely
clarifies that (1) a cultural resources agreement must be entered into with the Pechanga tribe before the
Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit, (2) that affordable units must be
constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate units, and (3) that the affordable units must be
dispersed throughout the development project. As such, the environmental impacts for the Project have
been evaluated by the previously adopted Negative Declaration for the Housing Element, and the EIR for
the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no further environmental review is necessary. None of the
circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review
and no further documentation is necessary.
D. In addition, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone will have a significant effect on the
environment, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3). Staff
is hereby directed to file a Notice of Exemption.
Section 4. Subsection A of Section 17.21.040 (Compliance with Laws) of Chapter
17.21 (Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section
17.21.040 remaining unchanged:
ORDINANCE NO. 2020-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER
17.21 REGARDING THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
OVERLAY ZONE, AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION
THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM
FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA
GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine, and declare that:
A. The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance, including the environmental
analysis, on March 18, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time
the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or
opposition to this matter.
B. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-09, recommending
approval of the Ordinance by the City Council.
C. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance, including the
environmental analysis, on 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed
by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or opposition to this matter.
D. Following the public hearing, the City Council considered the entire record of
information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council.
Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula in
approving the proposed Municipal Code amendment in Long Range Planning Project Number
LR20-0279 hereby makes the following findings:
A. The State Legislature has declared that the lack of housing, including providing for
a variety of housing types for all income levels and special needs groups, is a critical problem that
threatens the economic, environmental, and social quality of life in California.
B. Government Code Section 65583 requires that the City's Housing Element address
governmental constraints to the development of housing, including providing for a variety of
housing types for all income levels. The City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's
2014-2021 Housing Element on January 28, 2014. The City's Housing Element identified the
need to amend the City's Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone to
encourage the development of affordable housing in the City. On September 25, 2018, the City
Council adopted an ordinance establishing the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
C. Staff has now determined that the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance
should be amended to clarify (1) a cultural resources agreement must be entered into with the
Pechanga tribe before the Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit,
and (2) that affordable units must be constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate units,
and must be dispersed throughout the development project. These revisions are necessary to not
only protect the cultural resources in the area, but also to ensure that affordable housing is actually
constructed by project proponents that seek to develop projects using the overlay zone.
D. The proposed amendments to the affordable housing overlay zone ordinance are in
conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of elements of the General Plan.
The Ordinance implements the following policies contained in the City's Housing Element:
1. Policy 1. 1: Provide an inventory of land at varying densities sufficient
to accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City;
2. Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of
housing types in terms of cost, density, and type, and presents the
opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by
balancing jobs and housing types;
3. Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that
accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population, and provide
opportunities to meet Temecula's fair share of extremely low-, very low-,
low-, and moderate -income housing;
4. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private, and nonprofit efforts in
the development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs
groups;
5. Policy 3.1 Expedite processing procedures and fees for new
construction or rehabilitation of housing; and
6. Policy 5.2: Support efforts to ensure that all income segments of the
community have unrestricted access to appropriate housing.
Furthermore, the Ordinance implements the following goals and policies contained in the City's
General Plan Land Use Element:
7. Goal 1: A diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
recreational, public and open space land uses.
8. Policy 1.6: Encourage flexible zoning techniques in appropriate locations
to encourage mixed use development, preserve natural features, achieve
innovative site design, achieve a range of transition of densities, provide
open space and recreation facilities, and/or provide necessary amenities and
facilities.
E. The proposed amendments to the Municipal Code are consistent with the General
Plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. Residential development approved pursuant
to Chapter 17.21 complies with the requirements included in the City's General Plan Housing
Element.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby
makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the proposed Ordinance:
A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code
Sections 21000, et seq. ("CEQA")), and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of
Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15000, et seq.), the proposed Ordinance falls within the scope of
the environmental analysis conducted for the City's 2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the Uptown
Temecula Specific Plan.
B. On January 28, 2014, a Negative Declaration was adopted for the approval of the
2014 — 2021 Housing Element, which analyzed the potential impacts and determined that less than
significant impacts would result from the adoption of the 2014 — 2021 Housing Element. In 2019,
the City adopted the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone which was described in the City's Housing
Element. On November 17, 2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH #2013061012)
was certified in connection with the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The
Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance applied the affordable housing overlay zone to
certain parcels located in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area.
C. The proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance do
not increase the number of properties that are located within the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone,
or change the zoning designation of any of the properties within this overlay zone. Instead, the
ordinance merely clarifies that (1) a cultural resources agreement must be entered into with the
Pechanga tribe before the Community Development Director will issue an administrative permit,
(2) that affordable units must be constructed concurrent with or prior to the market rate units, and
(3) that the affordable units must be dispersed throughout the development project. As such, the
environmental impacts for the Project have been evaluated by the previously adopted Negative
Declaration for the Housing Element, and the EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no
further environmental review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines
Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation
is necessary.
D. In addition, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
proposed amendments to the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone will have a significant effect on
the environment, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section
15061(b)(3). Staff is hereby directed to file a Notice of Exemption.
Section 4. Subsection A of Section 17.21.040 (Compliance with Laws) of Chapter
17.21 (Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, with all other provisions of Section
17.21.040 remaining unchanged:
"A. The applicant shall enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the
Pechanga Tribe, and provide a copy of this agreement to the City before the Director approves the
Administrative Review Application. This Agreement shall address the following:
Treatment and disposition of cultural resources;
2. The designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional
Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing
activities;
3. Project grading and development scheduling;
4. Terms of compensation for the Pechange Tribal monitors;
5. Treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and
human remains discovered onsite;
6. Pechanga Tribal monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading in order to
evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the
property, and to make recommendations as to treatment;
7. The applicant's agreement to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources,
including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to
the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition; and
The applicant's agreement that all Pechanga Tribal sacred sites are to be
avoided and preserved."
Section 5. Subsection D of Section 17.21.060 (Regulations and Development
Standards.) of Chapter 17.21 (Affordable Housing Overlay Zoning District) of Title 17 (Zoning)
of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows, with all other provisions
of Section 17.21.060 remaining unchanged:
"D. At least 20 percent of the residential units of each building developed pursuant to this
Chapter 17.21 shall be reserved for households earning no greater than 80 percent of area median
income adjusted for family size appropriate to the unit. The units shall be sold or rented at an
affordable housing cost or affordable rent, as those terms are defined in Sections 50052.5 and
50053 of the California Health and Safety Code. If the units are rental units, the affordable units
shall be deed -restricted for a period of not less than fifty-five (55) years. If the units are for -sale
units, the units shall be sold in accordance with California Government Code Section 65915.
For any project that is developed pursuant to this Chapter 17.21, the affordable units must be
constructed concurrently with or prior to the construction of any market rate units. In addition, the
affordable units must be integrated with the market rate units so that there is a mix of affordable
and market rate units, if any, in each building of the development project."
Section 6. Sections 4 and 5 of this Ordinance shall not apply to any project that has
submitted an application that has been deemed complete by the City prior to April 22, 2020.
Section 7. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be
invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any
preemptive legislation, the remaining sections and/or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain
valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each
section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s)
may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation.
Section 8. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and
posted in the manner required by law.
Section 9. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day
of .2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 2020- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Temecula on the 26th day of May, 2020, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held
on the day of , 2020, the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Notice of Public Hearin
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below.
Case No.: Long Range Planning Project No. LR20-0279, Affordable Housing Overlay Zone Amendment
Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide
Proposal: An amendment to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code amending the timing for the submittal of
the Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement, add the requirements that affordable housing units must be
constructed concurrently with, or prior to, market rate housing units, and add that affordable housing units be
dispersed throughout the development project.
Environmental Action: Staff proposes that this Ordinance falls within the scope of the environmental analysis
conducted for the City's 2014 — 2021 Housing Element and the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and is exempt from
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), because it
can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the
environment. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and will be filed in accordance with CEQA and the State
CEQA Guidelines.
PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means
consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19
pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on
television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
DATE OF HEARING: May 26, 2020 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 PM
Due to the closure of the library and other city buildings and facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the agenda
packet is only viewable on the City's website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. To view the
proposed project application or questions concerning the project(s), please contact Dale West at (951) 693-3918.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and
controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or
proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council,
shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or
prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this City Council meeting, please
submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be
submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Electronic comments on agenda items for this City
Council meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.)
will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not
exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers
at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Council meeting.
Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400
Item No. 19
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Adopt California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Transportation Vehicle
Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis Guidelines
PREPARED BY: Sara Toma, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ("CEQA")
TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ("VMT")
ANALYSIS GUIDELINES FOR PURPOSES OF ANALYZING
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER CEQA, AND
MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA (LONG
RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR18-1506)
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is updating the current Traffic Impact
Analysis Guidelines to establish a new metric for the analysis of transportation impacts from new
development. The new guidelines will bring the City into conformance with Senate Bill ("SB")
743.
In September 2013, Governor Brown signed SB 743 (Steinberg). This legislation provided a shift
in the focus of transportation analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")
from Level of Service ("LOS"), which measures roadway capacity and automobile delay, to
Vehicle Miles Traveled ("VMT"), which is an estimate of the amount and distance people drive
by automobile to reach a destination. The desired outcomes from this change are a reduction in
auto emissions, the creation of inter -connected transportation networks with a variety of travel
modes, and the development of land uses designed to support those networks.
As part of a combined effort, staff worked closely with Western Riverside Council of Governments
("WRCOG") to stay updated on current VMT guidelines and potential grant opportunities. In
2018, staff applied for and was awarded a Sustainable Communities Program grant through the
Southern California Association of Government ("SCAG") under the Sustainable Communities
Program Grant to assist in updating the City's Traffic Impact Analysis ("TIA") Guidelines to
comply with SB 743. The City's existing TIA Guidelines provide a standard format and
methodology for assessing potential traffic and circulation impacts of proposed development
projects, General Plan Amendments, Specific Plans, and changes in land use zoning. The TIA
Guidelines use LOS based on intersection delay as the basis to analyze impacts to intersections
and roadway segments within a specified area.
The City entered into an agreement with Fehr & Peers to update the City's TIA Guidelines to
replace LOS based measurements with VMT for CEQA analysis concerning transportation
impacts. While LOS will not be used under CEQA, a project applicant will still be required to
analyze traffic impacts under the General Plan's Circulation Element as it relates to infrastructure
requirements.
The key differences between LOS and VMT are outlined below.
Transportation "Level of Service" (LOS) Measurement
LOS measures vehicle delay (i.e., congestion at intersections and on roadways) and is represented
as a letter grade A through F, where LOS A represents completely free flowing traffic, while LOS
F represents highly congested conditions. To calculate LOS for a project, a multi -step process is
required to identify, estimate, or obtain the following information: study intersections that may be
affected, existing traffic count and current delay data, and trips projected from a project, along
with travel mode (e.g., vehicle, transit, walking or bicycling) and direction of vehicle trip travel.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
VMT measures the amount and distance people drive by vehicle. Typically, development at a
greater distance from other land uses and in areas without transit generate more driving than
development near other land uses with more robust transportation options. Currently, VMT is used
to help measure other CEQA impacts within the City, including air quality and greenhouse gas
emissions at a project level, and in General Plan or program -level analysis, to identify long-range
transportation impacts.
Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Technical Advisory
In December 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") provided a Technical
Advisory evaluating transportation impacts under CEQA, as a service to professional planners,
land use officials, and CEQA practitioners. The purpose of the OPR Technical Advisory is to
provide advice and recommendations, which agencies may use at their discretion in preparing
environmental documents subject to CEQA.
OPR assisted in the determination of significance, as many lead agencies rely on "thresholds of
significance." The CEQA Guidelines define a "threshold of significance" to mean "an identifiable
quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, non-compliance
with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the agency and
compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to be less than significant."
(CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.7, subd. (a).) Lead agencies have discretion to develop and
adopt their own thresholds, or rely on thresholds recommended by other agencies, provided that
the decision of the lead agency to adopt such thresholds is supported by substantial evidence.
DISCUSSION
Implementing the Requirements of SB 743 Legislation
To implement the legislation, the lead agency (the City) needs to determine an appropriate VMT
methodology, thresholds, and feasible mitigation measures. Because VMT is a new methodology
to analyze transportation impacts, and OPR's Technical Advisory recommended that the lead
agency have discretion to develop and adopt its own thresholds, there is a need to develop
appropriate guidance for projects subject to environmental review. Furthermore, to assist lead
agencies in western Riverside County with SB 743 implementation, WRCOG, with support from
SCAG, developed implementation guidance and a VMT impact screening tool with the WRCOG
SB 743 Implementation Pathway Study. The guidance is to ensure that all projects reviewed by
the City use the same data, approaches, and analytical tools.
Because SB 743 represents a significant departure from the City's current practice of using LOS,
the City must address the following questions below, prior to taking any action:
1. Methodology — what methodology should be used to forecast projected -generated VMT
and the project's effect on VMT under baseline and cumulative conditions, and how does
the selection of a threshold influence the methodology decision?
2. Thresholds — what threshold options are available to each jurisdiction and what substantial
evidence exists to support selecting a specific VMT threshold?
3. Mitigation — what would constitute feasible mitigation measures for a VMT impact given
the land use and transportation context of the WRCOG region?
The following is a description of the methodologies analyzed to forecast "project -generated
VMT," criteria used to establish VMT thresholds of significance, and the identification of potential
mitigation measures that can be used to address CEQA.
1. Methodology
Baseline VMT Methodology and Data: Base Year (2012) total VMT per service population (i.e.,
population plus employment), home -based VMT per capita, and home -based work VMT per
worker were calculated using outputs from SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan travel
forecasting model and the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model ("RIVTAM"). In
addition, data from the California Household Travel Survey was used to compare model derived
estimates of home -based VMT with those based on survey observations. VMT results and
comparisons of results from different data sources were displayed graphically to aid in determining
the appropriate VMT metric and data source for calculating VMT for use in the WRCOG sub
region.
Based on the different options analyzed, it is recommended to utilize the RIVTAM and the VMT
per service population data, as noted in the WRCOG analyses. Jurisdictions and technical experts
have been utilizing RIVTAM since 2009; there is a familiarity with the model. Furthermore, a
new version of the Riverside County Travel Demand Model (RIVTAM/RIVCOM) is being
developed and will be renamed Riverside County Modal ("RIVCOM") by WRCOG and will be
ready for use by Fall 2020. The new version of the model will be updated and refined to include
full external trip lengths.
Tools Assessment: The capabilities of travel forecasting models, along with eleven sketch model
tools were reviewed to determine their strengths and weaknesses in generating appropriate VMT
results for SB 743 analysis and testing VMT mitigation strategies. Based on the travel forecasting
model review, it is recommended that the RIVTAM be utilized for VMT impact analysis.
2. Thresholds
Potential VMT thresholds were assessed within the context of the objectives of SB 743, legal
opinions related to the legislation, proposed CEQA Guidelines updates, and the Technical
Advisory produced by OPR. The project team, led by Fehr & Peers, identified four threshold
options for consideration by lead agency (the City).
a) Thresholds consistent with OPR's Technical Advisory, recommending that proposed
developments generate VMT per person that is 15% below existing VMT per capita;
b) Thresholds consistent with Lead Agency air quality, greenhouse gas emissions reduction,
and energy conservation goals;
c) Thresholds consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities
Strategy future year VMT projects by jurisdiction or sub -region; and
Thresholds based on baseline VMT performance by jurisdiction or sub -region.
3. Mitigation
Transportation Demand Management ("TDM") strategies and its effectiveness for reducing VMT
were reviewed and assessed for relevancy. Given the City's suburban land use context, the
following key strategies were identified as the most appropriate.
• Diversifying land use
• Improving pedestrian networks
• Implementing traffic calming infrastructure
• Building off-street bicycle network improvements
• Encouraging telecommuting and alternative work schedules
• Providing ride -share programs
Due to limitations of project -by -project approaches to reducing VMT, an evaluation of larger
mitigation programs was conducted by WRCOG. The evaluation considered existing programs
such as the WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") Program and new
mitigation program concepts. While the TUMF Program funds a variety of projects including
those that would contribute to VMT reduction, the overall effect of the Program results in an
increase in VMT due to substantial roadway capacity expansion. The TUMF Program could be
modified to separate the VMT, reducing projects into a separate impact fee program based on a
VMT reduction nexus, but it could not be relied upon for VMT mitigation in its current form. New
program concepts included VMT mitigation banks and exchanges. These are innovative concepts
that have not yet been developed and tested but are being considered in areas where limited
mitigation options would otherwise exist. WRCOG is undertaking a study to look into the
feasibility of a VMT mitigation bank or exchange in order to further assist lead agencies in
implementing SB 743.
CEQA TRANSPORTATION VMT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
Taking the above factors into consideration, staff worked with Fehr & Peers to revise the City's
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to include a VMT section (CEQA Transportation VMT
Analysis Guidelines) to ensure consistency with SB 743. The draft VMT section is consistent with
OPR's Technical Advisory Guidelines and WRCOG's SB 743 Implementation Pathway Study.
The VMT Analysis Guideline document is organized as follows:
1. Metric and Methodology for Calculating VMT
2. VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects
3. VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects
4. VMT Reduction and Mitigation Measures
5. Cumulative VMT Impacts
The following is a short description of established VMT thresholds of significance, VMT analysis
for land use and transportation projects, mitigation, and cumulative VMT impacts. For full details,
see Attachment 1: CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines.
1. Metric and Methodology for Calculating VMT
Transportation VMT analysis for CEQA should be conducted using the Riverside County
Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM). The Model outputs can be used to produce Total VMT
per Service Population and Total VMT. VMT per Service Population is established by dividing
the total VMT with at least one trip end in the City by the population plus employment of the City.
VMT = Vehicle Trips x Trip Average Length
OR
VMT = Roadway Volume x Roadway Distance
2. VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects
Screening Criteria for CEQA VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects
The requirements to prepare a detailed VMT analysis applies to all projects except for the
following types of Projects, as they will not result in significant transportation impacts:
1. Small Residential and Employment projects
2. Projects Located Near a Major Transit Stop/High Quality Transit Corridor
3. Projects Located in a VMT Efficient Area
4. Locally Serving Retail Projects
5. Locally Serving Public Facilities
6. Redevelopment Projects with Greater VMT Efficiency
7. Affordable Housing
Include verbiage along the lines of — these projects being "screened out" — or something that helps
the reader understand what screening criteria means
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Land Use Projects
Projects that do not meet the above screening criteria must include a detailed evaluation of the
VMT produced by the project. Any project with a VMT/Service Population 15% below the
WRCOG baseline average VMT/Service Population can be presumed to have a less than
significant impacts.
3. VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects
For transportation projects, any project that results in an increase in additional motor vehicle
capacity (such as constructing a new roadway or adding additional vehicle travel lanes on an
existing roadway) has the potential to increase vehicle travel, referred to as "induced vehicle
travel." Appendix C of the VMT Analysis Guidelines contains a list of transportation projects
that, absent substantial evidence to the contrary, do not require an induced travel/VMT analysis
because they typically do not cause substantial or measurable increases in VMT.
4. VMT Reduction and Mitigation Measures
Consistent with general CEQA principles, if a project is found to have a significant impact on
VMT, the impact must be reduced by modifying the project so that the VMT is reduced to an
acceptable level (below the established thresholds of significance) and/or by imposing all feasible
mitigation measures to mitigate the VMT impact to a less than significant level. If, after imposing
all feasible mitigation measures, the project VMT levels are still above the established thresholds
of significance, the City will consider adoption of a statement of overriding considerations in
compliance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093, as already occurs when impacts in
any area remain significant after adoption of all feasible mitigation.
5. Cumulative VMT Impacts
Because VMT is a composite metric that will continue to be generated over time, a key
consideration for cumulative scenarios is whether the rate of VMT generation gets better or worse
in the long term. If the rate is trending down over time consistent with expectations for air pollutant
and GHGs, then the project level analysis may suffice. However, the trend direction must be
supported with substantial evidence. A project would result in a significant project -generated VMT
impact under cumulative conditions if the cumulative project -generated VMT per service
population exceeds the WRCOG baseline VMT per service population.
Measuring the "project's effect on VMT" is necessary especially under cumulative conditions to
fully explain the project's impact. A project effect on VMT under cumulative conditions would be
considered significant if the cumulative total VMT per service population increases under the plus
project condition compared to the no project condition.
PUBLIC MEETINGS
Planning Commission
On April 22, 2020, the Planning Commission by a vote of 5-0 recommended City Council approval
of the draft CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines for implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act for the City of Temecula.
Public Traffic Safety Commission
On April 23, 2020, the Public Traffic Safety Commission received and filed the proposed draft
CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines for implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act for the City of Temecula.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing published in the SD Union Tribune on May 14, 2020.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: In accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the adoption of the CEQA Traffic Analysis
Update VMT Thresholds and Guidelines, which is an action consistent with Senate Bill ("SB")
743, will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment, and thus the Thresholds and Guidelines are not subject to CEQA (14 CCR §
15378(a)). In addition, the Thresholds and Guidelines are not a "project" within the meaning of
CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15378(b)(5) and constitute an action involving procedures for the
protection of the environment, which is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15308. Finally,
if the Thresholds and Guidelines are determined to be subject to CEQA, they are exempt therefrom
because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that these amendments will have a
significant effect on the environment. (14 CCR § 15061(b)(3).)
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
ATTACHMENTS: 1.
CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
2.
Resolution No. 2020-
3.
Notice of Public Hearing
4.
April 22, 2020 Planning Commission Staff Report
5.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2020-10
CEQA
Transportation
VMT Analysis
Guidelines
City of Temecula
April 3, 2020
FEHR j PEERS
Table of Contents
Overview........................................................................................................................................ 1
Metrics and Methodology for Calculating VMT........................................................................ 3
VMTper Service Population....................................................................................................................................................3
TotalVMT (Boundary Method)...............................................................................................................................................3
TripLength Adjustments..........................................................................................................................................................3
VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects............................................................................................ 6
Screening Criteria for CEQA VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects............................................................................6
1. Small Residential and Employment Projects........................................................................................................6
2. Projects Located Near a Major Transit Stop/High Quality Transit Corridor............................................6
3. Projects Located in a VMT Efficient Area..............................................................................................................6
4. Locally Serving Retail Projects...................................................................................................................................7
5. Locally Serving Public Facilities.................................................................................................................................7
6. Redevelopment Projects with Greater VMT Efficiency.....................................................................................7
7. Affordable Housing........................................................................................................................................................7
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Land Use Projects................................................................................................7
VMT Analysis Procedures for Land Use Projects.............................................................................................................7
VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects................................................................................. 9
Screening Criteria for CEQA VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects................................................................9
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Transportation Projects.....................................................................................9
VMT Analysis Procedures for Transportation Projects..................................................................................................9
VMT Reduction and Mitigation Measures.................................................................................. 9
CumulativeVMT Impacts...........................................................................................................
10
Appendices
Appendix A: Model Gateway Distances
Appendix B: VMT Screening Maps
Appendix C: Transportation Projects That Do Not Require VMT Analysis
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
Overview
SB 743, signed by the Governor in 2013, changes the focus of transportation impact analysis in CEQA from
measuring impacts to drivers, to measuring the impact of driving. The change is being made by replacing
LOS with VMT and providing streamlined review of land use and transportation projects that will help
reduce future VMT growth. This shift in transportation impact focus is expected to better align
transportation impact analysis and mitigation outcomes with the State's goals to reduce greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions, encourage infill development, and improve public health through more active
transportation.
In January 2019, the Natural Resources Agency finalized updates to the CEQA Guidelines including the
incorporation of SB 743 modifications. The Office of Planning and Research (OPR) published its latest
Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA to the California Natural Resources
Agency in December 2018. This Technical Advisory provides recommendations on how to evaluate
transportation impacts under SB 743. These changes include elimination of auto delay, LOS, and other
similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant CEQA
transportation impacts. The OPR guidance recommends the use of Vehicle Miles Travelled, or VMT, as the
preferred CEQA transportation metric. To comply with the new legislation the City of Temecula has
established a VMT analysis methodology, established VMT thresholds for CEQA transportation impacts,
and identified of possible mitigation strategies. SB 743 includes the following two legislative intent
statements:
1. Ensure that the environmental impacts of traffic, such as noise, air pollution, and safety concerns,
continue to be properly addressed and mitigated through the California Environmental Quality
Act.
2. More appropriately balance the needs of congestion management with statewide goals related
to infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of
GHG emissions.
Since CEQA transportation analysis now requires an evaluation of a project's potential impacts related to
VMT significance criteria, the VMT analysis will:
• Enable proposed development projects to comply with current CEQA requirements as a result of
the implementation of SB 743.
• Outline the County's CEQA significance thresholds, screening criteria, and methodology for
conducting the transportation VMT analysis.
• Help determine if mitigation is required to offset a project's significant VMT impacts.
• Identify VMT reduction measures and strategies to mitigate potential impacts below a level of
CEQA significance.
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
• Reduce the need to widen or build roads through effective use of the existing transportation
network and maximizing the use of alternative modes of travel throughout the County.
VMT is a metric that accounts for the number of vehicle trips generated and the length or distance of
those trips. VMT does not directly measure traffic operations but instead is a measure of network use or
efficiency, especially if expressed as a function of population or employment (i.e. VMT per resident). VMT
tends to increase as land use density decreases and travel becomes more reliant on the use of the
automobile due to the long distances between origins and destinations. VMT can also serve as a proxy for
impacts related to energy use, air pollution emissions, GHG emissions, safety, and roadway maintenance.
The relationship between VMT and energy or emissions is based on fuel consumption. The traditional use
of VMT in environmental impact analysis is to estimate mobile air pollution emissions, GHGs, and energy
consumption.
This guidelines document is organized as follows:
1. Metrics and Methodology for Calculating VMT
2. VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects
3. VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects
4. VMT Reduction and Mitigation Measures
5. Cumulative VMT Impacts
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
Metrics and Methodology for
Calculating VMT
Transportation VMT analysis for CEQA should be conducted using the Riverside County Transportation
Analysis Model (RIVTAM) 1. The model outputs can be used to produce Total VMT/Service Population and
Total VMT.
VMT per Service Population
VMT/Service Population is established by dividing the total VMT with at least one trip end in the City of
Temecula by the population plus employment of the City. The total VMT includes all internal VMT,
internal to external, and external to internal VMT (in other words all VMT regardless of geographic
boundaries). Since this metric combines VMT for residents and employees and reflects how accessible all
land uses are
(for example, geographies with higher density, more shopping, and more jobs will have lower
VMT/Service Population) it can be used to evaluate multiple types of projects. To analyze the VMT/Service
Population for a proposed project, the project's total VMT is divided by the project population plus
employment.
The total VMT (origin -destination method) within the City can be calculated directly from model outputs
by multiplying the origin -destination (O-D) trip matrix by the final assignment skims (O-D Method VMT).
The total VMT value should be appended to include VMT from all trips that enter or exit the Riverside
County, as explained in the Trip Length Adjustment section.
Total VMT (Boundary Method)
Total daily VMT within a given area can be measured by multiplying the daily volume on every roadway
segment by the length of every roadway segment within a given area. This is called Boundary Method
VMT. Examples of total VMT (Boundary Method) are VMT within the WRCOG region, VMT within the City
of Temecula, or VMT within the vicinity of a transportation project.
Trip Length Adjustments
Trip length adjustments for trips leaving the RIVTAM Model Area can be made by using the California
Statewide Travel Demand Model (CSTDM).
Adjusting the length of trips leaving a model boundary requires appending extra distance at the model
gateway zone (or external centroid) connectors. This process results in new gateway distances that are
weighted based on the amount and location of external travel origins and destinations.
RIVCOM is currently under development with an anticipated completion date in the Spring/Summer of 2020. Once
finalized, RIVCOM should be utilized for all forecasting activity.
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
The first step of this process is to determine trip volume leaving or entering the model boundary. These
are referred to as internal -to -external (IX) and external -to -internal (XI) trips. This data can be generated
either from O-D trip matrices or by conducting a select zone analysis to track trips to the model gateways.
The volume at the gateways for this purpose should not include external -to -external (XX) through trips.
Determining the full length of trips leaving or entering a model boundary requires an OD dataset that
includes flows between the model area and the area external to the model. The California Statewide
Travel Demand Model (CSTDM) should be used to develop the OD dataset.
The next step requires determining the gateway(s) based on the RIVTAM model which trips from the OD
data source would travel through. The trip length adjustment process ultimately requires calculating the
weighted average distance beyond each model gateway. The process of calculating trip lengths external
to the RIVTAM model region for trips entering or exiting the RIVTAM model area using the CSTDM is
described below:
• Create correspondence between Study Area TAZs within RIVTAM model to the Statewide Model
TAZs.
• Add "Gate" attribute to CSTDM roadway network links and set "Gate" equal to gateway id only for
those links identified as the locations corresponding to the RIVTAM model gateways.
• Add "Gate -Dist" attribute to CSTDM roadway network links and set "Gate -Dist" equal to the link
distance for those links outside the RIVTAM model boundary. All the CSTDM roadway links inside
the RIVTAM model boundary will have a "Gate -Dist" attribute of 0.
• Run a highway skim on the CSTDM roadway network to skim the shortest travel time between
each OD pair, tracking the gateway and distance outside the RIVTAM model boundary. • For each
gateway, summarize the average distance beyond the RIVTAM model boundary weighted by
volume at each gateway.
• Tag the gateway distance from the above step using CSTDM to the gateways in the RIVTAM
model and multiply to the gateway volume from the RIVTAM model to determine the gateway
external VMT to the RIVTAM model. Make sure not to double -count any overlap distance that's
already accounted for in the VMT calculation from the RIVTAM model.
Table 1 shows the base year (2012) weighted average distance beyond the RIVTAM model boundary for
trips passing through the Riverside County model gateway, as calculated using the methodology above.
A full list of distances for model gateway distances for the RIVTAM model can be found in Appendix A.
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
Table 1: Average Trip Distances South of Riverside County Line
SR-79
Pala Rd
1-15
Sandia Creek Rd
De Luz Rd
Tenaja Rd
Source: Fehr & Peers.
San Diego County
San Diego County
San Diego County
San Diego County
San Diego County
San Diego County
40.9
19.3
23.8
6.7
4.4
6.5
41.7
20.4
23.1
6.7
4.4
6.5
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
VMT Analysis for Land Use
Projects
Screening Criteria for CEQA VMT Analysis for Land Use
Projects
The requirements to prepare a detailed transportation VMT analysis apply to all land development
projects, except those that meet at least one of the screening criteria. A project that meets at least one of
the screening criteria below would have a less than significant VMT impact due to project characteristics
and/or location.
1. Small Residential and Employment Projects
Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips (trips are based on the number of vehicle trips after
any alternative modes/location-based adjustments are applied) may be presumed to have a less than
significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.
2. Projects Located Near a Major Transit Stop/High Quality Transit Corridor
Projects located within a half mile of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high -quality
transit corridor' may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to
the contrary. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project:
• Has a Floor Area Ratio of less than 0.75
• Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required
by the City
• Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high -income
residential units
3. Projects Located in a VMT Efficient Area
A VMT efficient area is any area with an average VMT per service population 15% below the baseline
average for the WRCOG region. Land use projects may qualify for the use of VMT efficient area screening
if the project can be reasonably expected to generate VMT per service population that is similar to the
existing land uses in the VMT efficient area. Projects located within a VMT efficient area may be presumed
' Major transit stop: a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail
transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes
or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. High quality transit corridor: a corridor with fixed
route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute periods.
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Screening maps for
each metric and subregion can be found in Appendix B.
4. Locally Serving Retail Projects
Local serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant
impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving retail generally improves the
convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel.
S. Locally Serving Public Facilities
Public facilities that serve the surrounding community or public facilities that are passive use may be
presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.
6. Redevelopment Projects with Greater VMT Efficiency
A redevelopment project may be presumed to have a less than significant impact if the proposed project's
total project VMT is less than the existing land use's total VMT.
7. Affordable Housing
An affordable housing project may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial
evidence to the contrary.
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Land Use Projects
Projects that do not meet the above screening criteria must include a detailed evaluation of the VMT
produced by the project. Any project with a VMT/Service Population 15% below the WRCOG baseline
average VMT/Service Population can be presumed to have a less than significant impact.
VMT Analysis Procedures for Land Use Projects
For projects which meet one of the screening criteria for CEQA VMT analysis, no additional analysis is
necessary. For projects which are not screened, an evaluation of the VMT produced by the project is
necessary. To complete the analysis, the project should be evaluated using the RIVTAM Model (or
RIVCOM model once available) to evaluate the VMT/Service population using the methodology described
in the Methodology section.
If the project includes transportation demand management (TDM) measures, the reduction in VMT due to
each measure shall be calculated and can be applied to the project analysis. There are several resources
for determining the reduction in VMT due to TDM measures, such as the California Air Pollution Control
Officers Association (CAPCOA) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (2010) (Quantification
Report).
The VMT reductions associated with project TDM should be applied to the project VMT estimate (nsuring
that the VMT reduction is applied to the appropriate project VMT. For example, if a commute trip
blo
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
reduction program is proposed for a multi -family residential project, the VMT reduction should only be
applied to the work related VMT associated with the project. If the project does not include any TDM,
then no reduction would be taken.
The resulting VMT values should be compared to the significance threshold determine whether the
project results in a significant CEQA transportation impact due to VMT.
110
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
VMT Analysis for
Transportation Projects
For transportation projects, any project that results in an increase in additional motor vehicle capacity
(such as constructing a new roadway or adding additional vehicle travel lanes on an existing roadway) has
the potential to increase vehicle travel, referred to as "induced vehicle travel."
Screening Criteria for CEQA VMT Analysis for Transportation
Projects
Appendix C contains a list of transportation projects that, absent substantial evidence to the contrary, do
not require an induced travel/VMT analysis since they typically do not cause substantial or measurable
increases in VMT.
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Transportation Projects
A net increase in area total VMT indicates that the project has a significant impact
VMT Analysis Procedures for Transportation Projects
To calculate the change in area (boundary method) total VMT, the transportation project should be input
into the travel demand model. The "with project" area total VMT produced by the model run is compared
to the "no project" area total VMT. A net increase in area VMT indicates that the project has a significant
impact
VMT Reduction and Mitigation
Measures
To mitigate VMT impacts, the project applicant must reduce VMT, which can be done by either reducing
the number of automobile trips generated by the project or by reducing the distance that people drive.
The following strategies are available to achieve this:
1. Modify the project's built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the project.
2. Implement TDM measures to reduce VMT generated by the project.
Strategies that reduce single occupant automobile trips or reduce travel distances are called TDM
strategies. There are several resources for determining the reduction in VMT due to TDM measures such
as the CAPCOA Quantification Report.
110
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
Cumulative VMT Impacts
Since VMT is a composite metric that will continue to be generated over time, a key consideration for
cumulative scenarios is whether the rate of VMT generation gets better or worse in the long-term. If the
rate is trending down over time consistent with expectations for air pollutant and GHGs, then the project
level analysis may suffice. However, the trend direction must be supported with substantial evidence. A
project would result in a significant project -generated VMT impact under cumulative conditions if the
cumulative project -generated VMT per service population exceeds the WRCOG baseline VMT per service
population.
Measuring the 'project's effect on VMT' is necessary especially under cumulative conditions to fully
explain the project's impact. A project effect on VMT under cumulative conditions would be considered
significant if the cumulative total VMT/service population increases under the plus project condition
compared to the no project condition.
Please note that the cumulative no project shall reflect the adopted RTP/SCS; as such, if a project is
consistent with the regional RTP/SCS, then the cumulative impacts shall be considered less than
significant.
Appendix A: Model Gateway Distances
US-101
Santa Barbara County
24.4
26.4
SR-150
Santa Barbara County
1.9
1.4
SR-33
Santa Barbara County
162.9
184.7
Lockwood Valley Rd
Kern County
1.8
1.9
1-5
Kern County
224.2
224.8
90th Street W
Kern County
26.9
19.8
60th Street W
Kern County
0.0
6.1
SR-14
Kern County
30.3
29.0
Sierra Hwy
Kern County
0.0
0.0
120th Street E
Kern County
13.0
13.1
Mercury Blvd.
( 200th St)
Kern County
0.0
0.0
SR-58
Kern County
102.8
92.7
SR-395
Kern County
134.8
122.1
SR-178
Kern County
2.9
3.6
Trona Rd
Inyo County
0.0
0.0
SR-127
Inyo County
38.9
37.9
Mesquite Valley Rd
Inyo County
0.0
0.0
Kingston Rd
State of Arizona
0.0
0.0
FEHRtPEERS
Appendix
SR-15
State of Arizona
0.0
0.0
Nipton Rd
State of Arizona
0.0
0.0
SR-95
State of Arizona
0.0
0.0
Needle Hwy
State of Arizona
0.0
0.0
1-40
State of Arizona
0.0
0.0
Parker Dam Rd
State of Arizona
0.0
0.0
SR-62
State of Arizona
0.0
0.0
1-10
State of Arizona
0.0
0.0
1-8
International Border - Mexico
0.0
0.0
SR-186
International Border - Mexico
0.0
0.0
SR-7
International Border - Mexico
0.0
0.0
SR-111
International Border - Mexico
0.0
0.0
1-8
Imperial County
67.2
63.8
SR-78
Imperial County
48.6
43.4
SR-22
Imperial County
28.1
26.1
SR-79
San Diego County
40.9
41.7
Pala Rd
San Diego County
19.3
20.4
1-15
San Diego County
23.8
23.1
Sandia Creek Rd
San Diego County
6.7
6.7
De Luz Rd
San Diego County
4.4
4.4
Tenaja Rd.
San Diego County
6.5
6.5
1-5
San Diego County
40.2
40.3
FEHRtPEERS
Appendix B: VMT Screening Maps
FEHRtPEERS
...................................
..................................
Riverside County
San Diego County
. < -15% below WRCOG Regional Average (Screened) 0 City Limits
0 to -15% below WRCOG Regional Average (Mitigatable) Q County Boundary
i Higher than WRCOG Regional Average (Challenge to Mitigate)
RIVTAM Model (2012)
Daily Total VMT per Service Population
Comparison to WRCOG Reaional Averaae
Appendix C: Transportation Projects
That Do Not Require VMT Analysis
The following complete list is provided in the OPR Technical Advisory (December 2018, Pages 20-21) for
transportation projects that "would not likely lead to a substantial or measurable increase in vehicle travel,
and therefore generally should not require an induced travel analysis:"
• Rehabilitation, maintenance, replacement, safety, and repair projects designed to improve the
condition of existing transportation assets (e.g., highways; roadways; bridges; culverts;
Transportation Management System field elements such as cameras, message signs, detection, or
signals; tunnels; transit systems; and assets that serve bicycle and pedestrian facilities) and that
do not add additional motor vehicle capacity
• Roadside safety devices or hardware installation such as median barriers and guardrails
• Roadway shoulder enhancements to provide "breakdown space," dedicated space for use only by
transit vehicles, to provide bicycle access, or to otherwise improve safety, but which will not be
used as automobile vehicle travel lanes
• Addition of an auxiliary lane of less than one mile in length designed to improve roadway safety •
Installation, removal, or reconfiguration of traffic lanes that are not for through traffic, such as left,
right, and U-turn pockets, two-way left turn lanes, or emergency breakdown lanes that are not
utilized as through lanes
• Addition of roadway capacity on local or collector streets provided the project also substantially
improves conditions for pedestrians, cyclists, and, if applicable, transit
• Conversion of existing general purpose lanes (including ramps) to managed lanes or transit lanes,
or changing lane management in a manner that would not substantially increase vehicle travel
• Addition of a new lane that is permanently restricted to use only by transit vehicles
• Reduction in number of through lanes
• Grade separation to separate vehicles from rail, transit, pedestrians or bicycles, or to replace a
lane in order to separate preferential vehicles (e.g., HOV, HOT, or trucks) from general vehicles
• Installation, removal, or reconfiguration of traffic control devices, including Transit Signal Priority
(TSP) features
• Installation of traffic metering systems, detection systems, cameras, changeable message signs
and other electronics designed to optimize vehicle, bicycle, or pedestrian flow
• Timing of signals to optimize vehicle, bicycle, or pedestrian flow
• Installation of roundabouts or traffic circles
• Installation or reconfiguration of traffic calming devices
• Adoption of or increase in tolls
FEHRtPEERS
Appendix
• Addition of tolled lanes, where tolls are sufficient to mitigate VMT increase
• Initiation of new transit service
• Conversion of streets from one-way to two-way operation with no net increase in number of
traffic lanes
• Removal or relocation of off-street or on -street parking spaces
• Adoption or modification of on -street parking or loading restrictions (including meters, time
limits, accessible spaces, and preferential/reserved parking permit programs)
• Addition of traffic wayfinding signage
• Rehabilitation and maintenance projects that do not add motor vehicle capacity
• Addition of new or enhanced bike or pedestrian facilities on existing streets/highways or within
existing public rights -of -way
• Addition of Class I bike paths, trails, multi -use paths, or other off -road facilities that serve
nonmotorized travel
• Installation of publicly available alternative fuel/charging infrastructure
• Addition of passing lanes, truck climbing lanes, or truck brake -check lanes in rural areas that do
not increase overall vehicle capacity along the corridor
RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ("CEQA")
TRANSPORTATION VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
("VMT") ANALYSIS GUIDELINES FOR PURPOSES OF
ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER
CEQA, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION
UNDER CEQA (LONG RANGE PLANNING
PROJECT NO. LR18-1506)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines")
encourage public agencies to develop and publish generally applicable "thresholds of significance"
to be used in determining the significance of a project's environmental effects; and
B. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (a) defines a thresholds of significance as "an
identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect,
noncompliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the
agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to less than
significant"; and
C. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (b) requires that thresholds of significance must
be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulations, developed through a public review
process, and be supported by substantial evidence; and
D. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (c), when adopting thresholds of
significance, a public agency may consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by
other public agencies provided that the decision of the agency is supported by substantial evidence;
and
E. Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013 and codified in Public Resources Code section
21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the criteria for determining the
significance of transportation impacts of projects; and
F. In 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") proposed, and
the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted, new CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3 that identifies vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") — meaning the amount and distance of
automobile travel attributable to a project — as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's
transportation impacts; and
G. As a result, automobile delay, as measured by "level of service" and other similar
metrics, generally no longer constitutes a significant environmental effect under CEQA; and
H. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 goes into effect on July 1, 2020, though public
agencies may elect to be governed by this section immediately; and
I. Staff worked with Fehr & Peers to revise the City's Traffic Impact Analysis ("TIA")
Guidelines and include a VMT Section (CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
("VMT Analysis Guidelines")) to ensure consistency with SB 743; and
J. On April 22, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission,
considered staff s presentation and reviewed the recommended thresholds of significance and the
VMT Analysis Guidelines and recommended that the City Council adopt the VMT Analysis
Guidelines; and
K. On April 23, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Public Traffic Safety
Commission considered staff s presentation and reviewed the recommended thresholds of
significance and the VMT Analysis Guidelines and recommended that the City Council adopt the
VMT Analysis Guidelines.
Section 2. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following
environmental findings and determinations in connection with the adoption of this resolution:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City Council has
been determined that the adoption of the VMT Thresholds and CEQA Transportation VMT
Analysis Guidelines, which is an action consistent with Senate Bill ("SB") 743, will not result in
a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and thus the
thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not subject to CEQA (14 CCR § 15378(a)). In
addition, the thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not a "project" within the meaning of
CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15378(b)(5) and constitute an action involving procedures for the
protection of the environment, which is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15308. Finally,
if the thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are determined to be subject to CEQA, they are
exempt therefrom because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that these
amendments will have a significant effect on the environment. (14 CCR § 15061(b)(3).)
Section 3. Further Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds the
thresholds of significance identified in the VMT Analysis Guidelines have been developed through
a public review process and are supported by substantial evidence, as required by CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.7.
Section 4. Approval of VMT Analysis Guidelines. The City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby adopts the CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" as part of the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines thereby establishing the VMT
thresholds of significance for transportation impact analysis under CEQA.
Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th
day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Notice of Public Hearing
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described
below.
Case No: Long Range Planning Project No. LR18-1506, CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide
Proposal: Long Range Project Number LR18-1506 to conform with State Law Senate Bill ("SB") 743 by
replacing vehicular Level of Service (LOS) with Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) transportation analysis metric
under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Environmental Action: The City has the adoption of this Resolution is not a "project" for purposes of
CEQA, as that term is defined by Guidelines Section 15378. Specifically, this Resolution constitutes
organizational or administrative activities of City government that will not result in direct or indirect physical
changes in the environment. (Guidelines Section 15378(b) (5)). Therefore, because it is not a "project," this
Resolution is not subject to CEQA's requirements. Further, even if this Resolution were deemed a "project" and
therefore subject to CEQA, the Resolution would be covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to
projects that have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. (Guidelines Section 15061 (b)
(3)). As an organizational or administrative activity which do not involve any commitment to any specific project
which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, this Resolution does not have
the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt under this general rule.
Further, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant
effect on the environment, and thus this Resolution is not subject to CEQA. (Guidelines Section 15061(b) (3)).
PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means
consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19
pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on
television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
DATE OF HEARING: May 26, 2020 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 PM
Due to the closure of the library and other city buildings and facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the agenda
packet is only viewable on the City's website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. To view the
proposed project application or questions concerning the project(s), please contact Sara Toma at (951) 506-5185.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and
controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or
proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council,
shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at,
or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this City Council meeting, please
submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be
submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Electronic comments on agenda items for this City
Council meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter,
etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not
exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers
at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Council meeting.
Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and Members of the Planning
Commission
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE OF MEETING: April 22, 2020
PREPARED BY: Sara Toma, Assistant Planner
PROJECT NAME: SB 743 Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT): CEQA Traffic Impact
Analysis Guidelines Update to include VMT Thresholds and
Guidelines
PROJECT Long Range Project Number LR18-1506. To conform with State Law
SUMMARY: Senate Bill ("SB") 743 by replacing vehicular Level of Service (LOS)
with Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) transportation analysis metric
under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
CEQA: Not subject to CEQA - CEQA Guidelines § 15378(a);
Categorically exempt from CEQA - CEQA Guidelines §§ 15378(b) (5),
15308 and 15061(b) (3).
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution
recommending that the City Council adopt Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) thresholds of significance for purposes of analyzing
transportation impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act.
BACKGROUND
In September 2013, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill ("SB") 743 (Steinberg). This legislation
provided a shift in the focus of transportation analysis under the California Environmental Quality
Act ("CEQA") from Level of Service ("LOS"), which measures roadway capacity and automobile
delay, to Vehicle Miles Traveled ("VMT"), which is an estimate of the amount and distance people
drive by automobile to reach a destination. The desired outcomes from this change are a reduction
in auto emissions, the creation of inter -connected transportation networks with a variety of travel
modes, and the development of land uses designed to support those networks.
As part of a combined effort, staff worked closely with Western Riverside Council of Governments
("WRCOG") to stay updated on current VMT guidelines and potential grant opportunities. In
2018, staff applied for and was awarded a Sustainable Communities Program grant through the
Southern California Association of Government ("SCAG") under the Sustainable Communities
Program Grant. In 2019, the City was selected and awarded by SCAG to assist in updating the
City's Traffic Impact Analysis ("TIA") Guidelines to facilitate compliance with SB 743. The
City's current TIA Guidelines provide a standard format and methodology for assessing potential
traffic and circulation impacts of proposed development projects, General Plan Amendments,
Specific Plans, and changes in land use zoning. The City's TIA Guidelines use LOS based on
intersection delay as the basis to analyze impacts to intersections and roadway segments within a
specified area. The City entered into an agreement with Fehr & Peers to update the City's TIA
Guidelines to replace LOS based measurements with VMT for CEQA analysis concerning
transportation impacts. While LOS will not be used under CEQA, a project applicant will still be
required to analyze traffic impacts under the General Plan's Circulation Element as it relates to
infrastructure requirements.
The key differences between LOS and VMT are outlined below.
Transportation "Level of Service" (LOS) Measurement
LOS measures vehicle delay (i.e., congestion at intersections and on roadways) and is represented
as a letter grade A through F, where LOS A represents completely free flowing traffic, while LOS
F represents highly congested conditions. To calculate LOS for a project, a multi -step process is
required to identify, estimate, or obtain the following information: study intersections that may be
affected, existing traffic count and current delay data, and trips projected from a project, along
with travel mode (e.g., vehicle, transit, walking or bicycling) and direction of vehicle trip travel.
Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT)
VMT measures the amount and distance people drive by vehicle. Typically, development at a
greater distance from other land uses and in areas without transit generate more driving than
development near other land uses with more robust transportation options. Currently, VMT is used
to help measure other CEQA impacts within the City, including air quality and greenhouse gas
emissions at a project level, and in General Plan or program -level analysis, to identify long-range
transportation impacts.
Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR)
In December 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") provided a Technical
Advisory evaluating transportation impacts under CEQA, as a service to professional planners,
land use officials, and CEQA practitioners. The purpose of the OPR document is to provide advice
and recommendations, which agencies use at their discretion in preparing environmental
documents subject to CEQA.
OPR assisted in the determination of significance, as many lead agencies rely on "thresholds of
significance." The CEQA Guidelines define a "threshold of significance" to mean "an identifiable
quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, non-compliance
with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the agency and
compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to be less than significant."
(CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.7, subd. (a).) Lead agencies have discretion to develop and
adopt their own thresholds, or rely on thresholds recommended by other agencies, provided that
the decision of the lead agency to adopt such thresholds is supported by substantial evidence.
N
DISCUSSION
Implementing the Requirements of SB 743 Legislation
To implement the legislation, the lead agency (the City) needs to determine an appropriate VMT
methodology, thresholds, and feasible mitigation measures. Since VMT is a new methodology to
analyze transportation impacts, and OPR's Technical Advisory recommended that the lead agency
have discretion to develop and adopt its own thresholds, there is a need to develop appropriate
guidance for projects subject to environmental review. Furthermore, to assist lead agencies in
western Riverside County with SB 743 implementation, WRCOG, with support from SCAG,
developed implementation guidance and a VMT impact screening tool with the WRCOG SB 743
Implementation Pathway Study. The guidance is to ensure that all projects reviewed by the City
use the same data, approaches, and analytical tools.
Since SB 743 represents a significant departure from the City's current practice of using LOS, the
City must address the following questions below, prior to taking any action:
Methodology — what methodology should be used to forecast projected -generated VMT
and the project's effect on VMT under baseline and cumulative conditions, and how does
the selection of a threshold influence the methodology decision?
2. Thresholds —what threshold options are available to each jurisdiction and what substantial
evidence exists to support selecting a specific VMT threshold?
3. Mitigation — what would constitute feasible mitigation measures for a VMT impact given
the land use and transportation context of the WRCOG region?
The following is a description of the methodologies analyzed to forecast "project -generated
VMT," criteria used to establish VMT thresholds of significance, and the identification of potential
mitigation measures that can be used to address CEQA.
1. Methodology
Baseline VMT Methodology and Data: Base Year (2012) total VMT per service population
(i.e., population plus employment), home -based VMT per capita, and home -based work VMT per
worker were calculated using outputs from SCAG's Regional Transportation Plan travel
forecasting model and the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model ("RIVTAM"). In
addition, data from the California Household Travel Survey was used to compare model derived
estimates of home -based VMT with those based on survey observations. VMT results and
comparisons of results from different data sources were displayed graphically to aid in determining
the appropriate VMT metric and data source for calculating VMT for use in the WRCOG sub-
region.
Based on the different options analyzed, it is recommended to utilize the RIVTAM and the VMT
per service population data, as noted in the WRCOG analyses. Jurisdictions and technical experts
have been utilizing RIVTAM since 2009; there is a familiarity with the model. Furthermore, a
new version of the Riverside County Travel Demand Model (RIVTAM/RIVCOM) is being
developed and will be called Riverside County Modal ("RIVCOM") by WRCOG and will be ready
for use by Fall 2020. The new version of the model will be updated and refined to include full
external trip lengths.
Tools Assessment: The capabilities of travel forecasting models, along with eleven sketch model
tools were reviewed to determine their strengths and weaknesses in generating appropriate VMT
results for SB 743 analysis and testing VMT mitigation strategies. Based on the travel forecasting
model review, it is recommended that the RIVTAM be utilized for VMT impact analysis.
2. Thresholds
Potential VMT thresholds were assessed within the context of the objectives of SB 743, legal
opinions related to the legislation, proposed CEQA Guidelines updates, and the Technical
Advisory produced by OPR. The project team, led by Fehr & Peers, identified four threshold
options for consideration by lead agency (the City).
a) Thresholds consistent with OPR's Technical Advisory, recommending that proposed
developments generate VMT per person that is 15% below existing VMT per capita;
b) Thresholds consistent with Lead Agency air quality, greenhouse gas emissions reduction,
and energy conservation goals;
c) Thresholds consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities
Strategy future year VMT projects by jurisdiction or sub -region; and
d) Thresholds based on baseline VMT performance by jurisdiction or sub -region.
3. Mitigation
Transportation Demand Management ("TDM") strategies and its effectiveness for reducing VMT
were reviewed and assessed for relevancy. Given the City's suburban land use context, the
following key strategies were identified as the most appropriate.
• Diversifying land use
• Improving pedestrian networks
• Implementing traffic calming infrastructure
• Building off-street bicycle network improvements
• Encouraging telecommuting and alternative work schedules
• Providing ride -share programs
Due to limitations of project -by -project approaches to reducing VMT, an evaluation of larger
mitigation programs was conducted by WRCOG. The evaluation considered existing programs
such as the WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") Program and new
mitigation program concepts. While the TUMF Program funds a variety of projects including
those that would contribute to VMT reduction, the overall effect of the Program results in an
increase in VMT due to substantial roadway capacity expansion. The TUMF Program could be
modified to separate the VMT, reducing projects into a separate impact fee program based on a
VMT reduction nexus, but it could not be relied upon for VMT mitigation in its current form. New
program concepts included VMT mitigation banks and exchanges. These are innovative concepts
that have not yet been developed and tested but are being considered in areas where limited
mitigation options would otherwise exist. WRCOG is undertaking a study to look into the
4
feasibility of a VMT mitigation bank or exchange in order to further assist lead agencies in
implementing SB 743.
CEQA TRANSPORTATION VMT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
Taking the above factors into consideration staff worked with Fehr & Peers to revise the City's
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines and include a VMT Section (CEQA Transportation
VMT Analysis Guidelines) to ensure consistency with SB 743. The draft VMT Section is
consistent with OPR's Technical Advisory Guidelines and WRCOG's SB 743 Implementation
Pathway Study.
The VMT Analysis Guideline document is organized as follows:
1. Metric and Methodology for Calculating VMT
2. VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects
3. VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects
4. VMT Reduction and Mitigation Measures
5. Cumulative VMT Impacts
The following is a short description of established VMT thresholds of significance, VMT analysis
for land use and transportation projects, mitigation, and cumulative VMT impacts. For full details,
see Attachment 1: (CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines).
1. Metric and Methodology for Calculating VMT
Transportation VMT analysis for CEQA should be conducted using the Riverside County
Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM). The Model outputs can be used to produce Total VMT
per Service Population and Total VMT. VMT per Service Population is established by dividing
the total VMT with at least one trip end in the City by the population plus employment of the City.
2. VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects
Screening Criteria for CEOA VMT Analysis for Land Use Proiects
The requirements to prepare a detailed VMT analysis applies to all Projects except the following
types of Projects, as they will not result in significant transportation impacts:
1. Small Residential and Employment projects
2. Projects Located Near a Major Transit Stop/High Quality Transit Corridor
3. Projects Located in a VMT Efficient Area
4. Locally Serving Retail Projects
5. Locally Serving Public Facilities
6. Redevelopment Projects with Greater VMT Efficiency
7. Affordable Housing
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Land Use Projects
Projects that do not meet the above screening criteria must include a detailed evaluation of the
VMT produced by the project. Any project with a VMT/Service Population 15% below the
WRCOG baseline average VMT/Service Population can be presumed to have a less than
significant impacts.
3. VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects
For transportation projects, any project that results in an increase in additional motor vehicle
capacity (such as constructing a new roadway or adding additional vehicle travel lands on an
existing roadway) has the potential to increase vehicle travel, referred to as "induced vehicle
travel". Appendix C of the VMT Analysis Guidelines contains a list of transportation projects
that, absent substantial evidence to the contrary, do not require an induced travel/VMT analysis
since they typically do not cause substantial or measurable increases in VMT.
4. VMT Reduction and Mitigation Measures
Consistent with general CEQA principles, if a project is found to have a significant impact on
VMT, the impact must be reduced by modifying the project so that the VMT is reduced to an
acceptable level (below the established thresholds of significance) and/or by imposing all feasible
mitigation measures to mitigate the VMT impact to a less than significant level. If, after imposing
all feasible mitigation measures, the project VMT levels are still above the established thresholds
of significance, the City will consider adoption of a statement of overriding considerations in
compliance with CEQA Guidelines section 15091 and 15093, as already occurs when impacts in
any area remain significant after adoption of all feasible mitigation.
5. Cumulative VMT Impacts
Since VMT is a composite metric that will continue to be generated over time, a key consideration
for cumulative scenarios is whether the rate of VMT generation gets better or worse in the long-
term. If the rate is trending down over time consistent with expectations for air pollutant and
GHGs, then the project level analysis may suffice. However, the trend direction must be supported
with substantial evidence. A project would result in a significant project -generated VMT impact
under cumulative conditions if the cumulative project -generated VMT per service population
exceeds the WRCOG baseline VMT per service population.
Measuring the "project's effect on VMT" is necessary especially under cumulative conditions to
fully explain the project's impact. A project effect on VMT under cumulative conditions would be
considered significant if the cumulative total VMT/service population increases under the plus
project condition compared to the no project condition.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing published in the SD Union Tribune on April 9, 2020.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined that
the adoption of the CEQA Traffic Analysis Update VMT Thresholds and Guidelines, which is an
action consistent with Senate Bill ("SB") 743, will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable
indirect physical change in the environment, and thus the Thresholds and Guidelines are not
subject to CEQA (14 CCR § 15378(a)). In addition, the Thresholds and Guidelines are not a
"project" within the meaning of CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15378(b)(5) and constitute an action
involving procedures for the protection of the environment, which is exempt from CEQA pursuant
to 14 CCR § 15308. Finally, if the Thresholds and Guidelines are determined to be subject to
CEQA, they are exempt therefrom because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that these amendments will have a significant effect on the environment. (14 CCR § 15061(b)(3).)
ATTACHMENTS: 1. CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
2. Planning Commission Resolution
3. Exhibit A — City Council Resolution
4. Notice of Public Hearing
0
CEQA Transportation
VW Analysis
Guidelines
City of Temecula
April 3, 2020
FEHR j PEERS
Table of Contents
Overview........................................................................................................................................ 1
Metrics and Methodology for Calculating VMT........................................................................ 3
VMTper Service Population....................................................................................................................................................3
TotalVMT (Boundary Method)...............................................................................................................................................3
TripLength Adjustments...........................................................................................................................................................3
VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects............................................................................................ 6
Screening Criteria for CEQA VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects............................................................................6
1. Small Residential and Employment Projects........................................................................................................6
2. Projects Located Near a Major Transit Stop/High Quality Transit Corridor............................................6
3. Projects Located in a VMT Efficient Area...............................................................................................................6
4. Locally Serving Retail Projects...................................................................................................................................7
5. Locally Serving Public Facilities.................................................................................................................................7
6. Redevelopment Projects with Greater VMT Efficiency.....................................................................................7
7. Affordable Housing........................................................................................................................................................7
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Land Use Projects.................................................................................................7
VMT Analysis Procedures for Land Use Projects.............................................................................................................7
VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects.................................................................................. 9
Screening Criteria for CEQA VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects.................................................................9
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Transportation Projects.....................................................................................9
VMT Analysis Procedures for Transportation Projects..................................................................................................9
VMT Reduction and Mitigation Measures................................................................................ 10
CumulativeVMT Impacts........................................................................................................... 11
Appendices
Appendix A: Model Gateway Distances
Appendix B: VMT Screening Maps
Appendix C: Transportation Projects That Do Not Require VMT Analysis
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
Overview
SB 743, signed by the Governor in 2013, changes the focus of transportation impact analysis in CEQA from
measuring impacts to drivers, to measuring the impact of driving. The change is being made by replacing
LOS with VMT and providing streamlined review of land use and transportation projects that will help
reduce future VMT growth. This shift in transportation impact focus is expected to better align
transportation impact analysis and mitigation outcomes with the State's goals to reduce greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions, encourage infill development, and improve public health through more active
transportation.
In January 2019, the Natural Resources Agency finalized updates to the CEQA Guidelines including the
incorporation of SB 743 modifications. The Office of Planning and Research (OPR) published its latest
Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA to the California Natural Resources
Agency in December 2018. This Technical Advisory provides recommendations on how to evaluate
transportation impacts under SB 743. These changes include elimination of auto delay, LOS, and other
similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant CEQA
transportation impacts. The OPR guidance recommends the use of Vehicle Miles Travelled, or VMT, as the
preferred CEQA transportation metric. To comply with the new legislation the City of Temecula has
established a VMT analysis methodology, established VMT thresholds for CEQA transportation impacts,
and identified of possible mitigation strategies. SB 743 includes the following two legislative intent
statements:
1. Ensure that the environmental impacts of traffic, such as noise, air pollution, and safety concerns,
continue to be properly addressed and mitigated through the California Environmental Quality
Act.
2. More appropriately balance the needs of congestion management with statewide goals related to
infill development, promotion of public health through active transportation, and reduction of
GHG emissions.
Since CEQA transportation analysis now requires an evaluation of a project's potential impacts related to
VMT significance criteria, the VMT analysis will:
• Enable proposed development projects to comply with current CEQA requirements as a result of
the implementation of SB 743.
• Outline the County's CEQA significance thresholds, screening criteria, and methodology for
conducting the transportation VMT analysis.
• Help determine if mitigation is required to offset a project's significant VMT impacts.
• Identify VMT reduction measures and strategies to mitigate potential impacts below a level of
CEQA significance.
• Reduce the need to widen or build roads through effective use of the existing transportation
network and maximizing the use of alternative modes of travel throughout the County.
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
VMT is a metric that accounts for the number of vehicle trips generated and the length or distance of
those trips. VMT does not directly measure traffic operations but instead is a measure of network use or
efficiency, especially if expressed as a function of population or employment (i.e. VMT per resident). VMT
tends to increase as land use density decreases and travel becomes more reliant on the use of the
automobile due to the long distances between origins and destinations. VMT can also serve as a proxy for
impacts related to energy use, air pollution emissions, GHG emissions, safety, and roadway maintenance.
The relationship between VMT and energy or emissions is based on fuel consumption. The traditional use
of VMT in environmental impact analysis is to estimate mobile air pollution emissions, GHGs, and energy
consumption.
This guidelines document is organized as follows:
1. Metrics and Methodology for Calculating VMT
2. VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects
3. VMT Analysis for Transportation Projects
4. VMT Reduction and Mitigation Measures
5. Cumulative VMT Impacts
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
Metrics and Methodology for
CzdcWafingVW
Transportation VMT analysis for CEQA should be conducted using the Riverside County Transportation
Analysis Model (RIVTAM)1. The model outputs can be used to produce Total VMT/Service Population and
Total VMT.
VMT per Service Population
VMT/Service Population is established by dividing the total VMT with at least one trip end in the City of
Temecula by the population plus employment of the City. The total VMT includes all internal VMT, internal
to external, and external to internal VMT (in other words all VMT regardless of geographic boundaries).
Since this metric combines VMT for residents and employees and reflects how accessible all land uses are
(for example, geographies with higher density, more shopping, and more jobs will have lower
VMT/Service Population) it can be used to evaluate multiple types of projects. To analyze the VMT/Service
Population for a proposed project, the project's total VMT is divided by the project population plus
employment.
The total VMT (origin -destination method) within the City can be calculated directly from model outputs
by multiplying the origin -destination (O-D) trip matrix by the final assignment skims (O-D Method VMT).
The total VMT value should be appended to include VMT from all trips that enter or exit the San Diego
County, as explained in the Trip Length Adjustment section.
Total VMT (Boundary Method)
Total daily VMT within a given area can be measured by multiplying the daily volume on every roadway
segment by the length of every roadway segment within a given area. This is called Boundary Method
VMT. Examples of total VMT (Boundary Method) are VMT within the WRCOG region, VMT within the City
of Temecula, or VMT within the vicinity of a transportation project.
Trip Length Adjustments
Trip length adjustments for trips leaving the RIVTAM Model Area can be made by using the California
Statewide Travel Demand Model (CSTDM).
RIVCOM is currently under development with an anticipated completion date in the Spring/Summer of 2020. Once
finalized, RIVCOM should be utilized for all forecasting activity.
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
Adjusting the length of trips leaving a model boundary requires appending extra distance at the model
gateway zone (or external centroid) connectors. This process results in new gateway distances that are
weighted based on the amount and location of external travel origins and destinations.
The first step of this process is to determine trip volume leaving or entering the model boundary. These
are referred to as internal -to -external (IX) and external -to -internal (XI) trips. This data can be generated
either from O-D trip matrices or by conducting a select zone analysis to track trips to the model gateways.
The volume at the gateways for this purpose should not include external -to -external (XX) through trips.
Determining the full length of trips leaving or entering a model boundary requires an OD dataset that
includes flows between the model area and the area external to the model. The California Statewide Travel
Demand Model (CSTDM) should be used to develop the OD dataset.
The next step requires determining the gateway(s) based on the RIVTAM model which trips from the OD
data source would travel through. The trip length adjustment process ultimately requires calculating the
weighted average distance beyond each model gateway. The process of calculating trip lengths external
to the RIVTAM model region for trips entering or exiting the RIVTAM model area using the CSTDM is
described below:
• Create correspondence between Study Area TAZs within RIVTAM model to the Statewide Model
TAZs.
• Add "Gate" attribute to CSTDM roadway network links and set "Gate" equal to gateway id only for
those links identified as the locations corresponding to the RIVTAM model gateways.
• Add "Gate -Dist" attribute to CSTDM roadway network links and set "Gate -Dist" equal to the link
distance for those links outside the RIVTAM model boundary. All the CSTDM roadway links inside
the RIVTAM model boundary will have a "Gate -Dist" attribute of 0.
• Run a highway skim on the CSTDM roadway network to skim the shortest travel time between
each OD pair, tracking the gateway and distance outside the RIVTAM model boundary.
• For each gateway, summarize the average distance beyond the RIVTAM model boundary
weighted by volume at each gateway.
• Tag the gateway distance from the above step using CSTDM to the gateways in the RIVTAM
model and multiply to the gateway volume from the RIVTAM model to determine the gateway
external VMT to the RIVTAM model. Make sure not to double -count any overlap distance that's
already accounted for in the VMT calculation from the RIVTAM model.
Table 1 shows the base year (2012) weighted average distance beyond the RIVTAM model boundary for
trips passing through the San Diego County model gateway, as calculated using the methodology above.
A full list of distances for model gateway distances for the RIVTAM model can be found in Appendix A.
blo
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
Table 1: Average Trip Distances South of San Diego County Line
SR-79
Pala Rd
1-15
Sandia Creek Rd
De Luz Rd
Tenaja Rd
Source: Fehr & Peers.
San Diego
40.9
41.7
San Diego
19.3
20.4
San Diego
23.8
23.1
San Diego
6.7
6.7
San Diego
4.4
4.4
San Diego
6.5
6.5
VI
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects
Screening Criteria for CEQA VMT Analysis for Land Use Projects
The requirements to prepare a detailed transportation VMT analysis apply to all land development
projects, except those that meet at least one of the screening criteria. A project that meets at least one of
the screening criteria below would have a less than significant VMT impact due to project characteristics
and/or location.
1. Small Residential and Employment Projects
Projects generating less than 110 daily vehicle trips (trips are based on the number of vehicle trips after
any alternative modes/location-based adjustments are applied) may be presumed to have a less than
significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.
2. Projects Located Near a Major Transit Stop/High Quality Transit Corridor
Projects located within a half mile of an existing major transit stop or an existing stop along a high -quality
transit corridor2 may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to
the contrary. This presumption may not be appropriate if the project:
• Has a Floor Area Ratio of less than 0.75
• Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required
by the City
• Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high -income
residential units
3. Projects Located in a VMT Efficient Area
A VMT efficient area is any area with an average VMT per service population 15% below the baseline
average for the WRCOG region. Land use projects may qualify for the use of VMT efficient area screening
if the project can be reasonably expected to generate VMT per service population that is similar to the
existing land uses in the VMT efficient area. Projects located within a VMT efficient area may be presumed
to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Screening maps for
each metric and subregion can be found in Appendix B.
2 Major transit stop: a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail
transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes
or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. High quality transit corridor: a corridor with fixed
route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute periods.
0
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
4. Locally Serving Retail Projects
Local serving retail projects less than 50,000 square feet may be presumed to have a less than significant
impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. Local serving retail generally improves the
convenience of shopping close to home and has the effect of reducing vehicle travel.
5. Locally Serving Public Facilities
Public facilities that serve the surrounding community or public facilities that are passive use may be
presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.
6. Redevelopment Projects with Greater VMT Efficiency
A redevelopment project may be presumed to have a less than significant impact if the proposed project's
total project VMT is less than the existing land use's total VMT.
7. Affordable Housing
An affordable housing project may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial
evidence to the contrary.
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Land Use Projects
Projects that do not meet the above screening criteria must include a detailed evaluation of the VMT
produced by the project. Any project with a VMT/Service Population 15% below the WRCOG baseline
average VMT/Service Population can be presumed to have a less than significant impact.
VMT Analysis Procedures for Land Use Projects
For projects which meet one of the screening criteria for CEQA VMT analysis, no additional analysis is
necessary. For projects which are not screened, an evaluation of the VMT produced by the project is
necessary. To complete the analysis, the project should be evaluated using the RIVTAM Model (or
RIVCOM model once available) to evaluate the VMT/Service population using the methodology described
in the Methodology section.
If the project includes transportation demand management (TDM) measures, the reduction in VMT due to
each measure shall be calculated and can be applied to the project analysis. There are several resources
for determining the reduction in VMT due to TDM measures, such as the California Air Pollution Control
Officers Association (CAPCOA) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (2010) (Quantification
Report).
The VMT reductions associated with project TDM should be applied to the project VMT estimate (nsuring
that the VMT reduction is applied to the appropriate project VMT. For example, if a commute trip
reduction program is proposed for a multi -family residential project, the VMT reduction should only be
applied to the work related VMT associated with the project. If the project does not include any TDM,
then no reduction would be taken.
110
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
The resulting VMT values should be compared to the significance threshold determine whether the
project results in a significant CEQA transportation impact due to VMT.
0
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
VMTAnzdysis for Transportation
Projects
For transportation projects, any project that results in an increase in additional motor vehicle capacity
(such as constructing a new roadway or adding additional vehicle travel lanes on an existing roadway) has
the potential to increase vehicle travel, referred to as "induced vehicle travel."
Screening Criteria for CEQA VMT Analysis for Transportation
Projects
Appendix C contains a list of transportation projects that, absent substantial evidence to the contrary, do
not require an induced travel/VMT analysis since they typically do not cause substantial or measurable
increases in VMT.
VMT Thresholds of Significance for Transportation Projects
A net increase in area total VMT indicates that the project has a significant impact
VMT Analysis Procedures for Transportation Projects
To calculate the change in area (boundary method) total VMT, the transportation project should be input
into the travel demand model. The "with project" area total VMT produced by the model run is compared
to the "no project" area total VMT. A net increase in area VMT indicates that the project has a significant
impact
110
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
VMT Reduction and Mitigation
Measures
To mitigate VMT impacts, the project applicant must reduce VMT, which can be done by either reducing
the number of automobile trips generated by the project or by reducing the distance that people drive.
The following strategies are available to achieve this:
1. Modify the project's built environment characteristics to reduce VMT generated by the project.
2. Implement TDM measures to reduce VMT generated by the project.
Strategies that reduce single occupant automobile trips or reduce travel distances are called TDM
strategies. There are several resources for determining the reduction in VMT due to TDM measures such
as the CAPCOA Quantification Report.
110
10
City of Temecula CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
4/3/2020
Cumulative VMT Impacts
Since VMT is a composite metric that will continue to be generated over time, a key consideration for
cumulative scenarios is whether the rate of VMT generation gets better or worse in the long-term. If the
rate is trending down over time consistent with expectations for air pollutant and GHGs, then the project
level analysis may suffice. However, the trend direction must be supported with substantial evidence. A
project would result in a significant project -generated VMT impact under cumulative conditions if the
cumulative project -generated VMT per service population exceeds the WRCOG baseline VMT per service
population.
Measuring the 'project's effect on VMT' is necessary especially under cumulative conditions to fully
explain the project's impact. A project effect on VMT under cumulative conditions would be considered
significant if the cumulative total VMT/service population increases under the plus project condition
compared to the no project condition.
Please note that the cumulative no project shall reflect the adopted RTP/SCS; as such, if a project is
consistent with the regional RTP/SCS, then the cumulative impacts shall be considered less than
significant.
Appendix A: Model Gateway Distances
US-101
Santa Barbara
24.4
26.4
SR-150
Santa Barbara
1.9
1.4
SR-33
Santa Barbara
162.9
184.7
Lockwood Valley Rd
Kern County
1.8
1.9
1-5
Kern County
224.2
224.8
90th Street W
Kern County
26.9
19.8
60th Street W
Kern County
0.0
6.1
SR-14
Kern County
30.3
29.0
Sierra Hwy
Kern County
0.0
0.0
120th Street E
Kern County
13.0
13.1
Mercury Blvd.
(200th St)
Kern County
0.0
0.0
SR-58
Kern County
102.8
92.7
SR-395
Kern County
134.8
122.1
SR-178
Kern County
2.9
3.6
Trona Rd
Inyo County
0.0
0.0
SR-127
Inyo County
38.9
37.9
Mesquite Valley Rd
Inyo County
0.0
0.0
Kingston Rd
Arizona
0.0
0.0
SR-15
Arizona
0.0
0.0
Nipton Rd
Arizona
0.0
0.0
SR-95
Arizona
0.0
0.0
Needle Hwy
Arizona
0.0
0.0
1-40
Arizona
0.0
0.0
Parker Dam Rd
Arizona
0.0
0.0
SR-62
Arizona
0.0
0.0
1-10
Arizona
0.0
0.0
1-8
Mexico
0.0
0.0
SR-186
Mexico
0.0
0.0
SR-7
Mexico
0.0
0.0
FEHR�PEERS
SR-111
Mexico
0.0
0.0
1-8
Imperial County
67.2
63.8
SR-78
Imperial County
48.6
43.4
SR-22
Imperial County
28.1
26.1
SR-79
San Diego
40.9
41.7
Pala Rd
San Diego
19.3
20.4
1-15
San Diego
23.8
23.1
Sandia Creek Rd
San Diego
6.7
6.7
De Luz Rd
San Diego
4.4
4.4
Tenaja Rd.
San Diego
6.5
6.5
1-5
San Diego
40.2
40.3
FEHR�PEERS
Appendix B: VMT Screening Maps
FEHR j PEERS
- < -15% below WRCOG Regional Average (Screened)
0 to -15% below WRCOG Regional Average (Mitigatable)
Higher than WRCOG Regional Average (Challenge to Mitigate)
San Diego County
. City Limits
OCounty Boundary
At
RIVTAM Model (2012)
Daily Total VMT per Service Population
Comparison to WRCOG Regional Average
Appendix C: Transportation Projects
That Do Not Require VMT Analysis
The following complete list is provided in the OPR Technical Advisory (December 2018, Pages 20-21) for
transportation projects that "would not likely lead to a substantial or measurable increase in vehicle travel,
and therefore generally should not require an induced travel analysis:"
• Rehabilitation, maintenance, replacement, safety, and repair projects designed to improve the
condition of existing transportation assets (e.g., highways; roadways; bridges; culverts;
Transportation Management System field elements such as cameras, message signs, detection, or
signals; tunnels; transit systems; and assets that serve bicycle and pedestrian facilities) and that do
not add additional motor vehicle capacity
• Roadside safety devices or hardware installation such as median barriers and guardrails
• Roadway shoulder enhancements to provide "breakdown space," dedicated space for use only by
transit vehicles, to provide bicycle access, or to otherwise improve safety, but which will not be
used as automobile vehicle travel lanes
• Addition of an auxiliary lane of less than one mile in length designed to improve roadway safety
• Installation, removal, or reconfiguration of traffic lanes that are not for through traffic, such as left,
right, and U-turn pockets, two-way left turn lanes, or emergency breakdown lanes that are not
utilized as through lanes
• Addition of roadway capacity on local or collector streets provided the project also substantially
improves conditions for pedestrians, cyclists, and, if applicable, transit
• Conversion of existing general purpose lanes (including ramps) to managed lanes or transit lanes,
or changing lane management in a manner that would not substantially increase vehicle travel
• Addition of a new lane that is permanently restricted to use only by transit vehicles
• Reduction in number of through lanes
• Grade separation to separate vehicles from rail, transit, pedestrians or bicycles, or to replace a
lane in order to separate preferential vehicles (e.g., HOV, HOT, or trucks) from general vehicles
• Installation, removal, or reconfiguration of traffic control devices, including Transit Signal Priority
(TSP) features
• Installation of traffic metering systems, detection systems, cameras, changeable message signs
and other electronics designed to optimize vehicle, bicycle, or pedestrian flow
• Timing of signals to optimize vehicle, bicycle, or pedestrian flow
• Installation of roundabouts or traffic circles
• Installation or reconfiguration of traffic calming devices
• Adoption of or increase in tolls
FEHR�PEERS
• Addition of tolled lanes, where tolls are sufficient to mitigate VMT increase
• Initiation of new transit service
• Conversion of streets from one-way to two-way operation with no net increase in number of
traffic lanes
• Removal or relocation of off-street or on -street parking spaces
• Adoption or modification of on -street parking or loading restrictions (including meters, time
limits, accessible spaces, and preferential/reserved parking permit programs)
• Addition of traffic wayfinding signage
• Rehabilitation and maintenance projects that do not add motor vehicle capacity
• Addition of new or enhanced bike or pedestrian facilities on existing streets/highways or within
existing public rights -of -way
• Addition of Class I bike paths, trails, multi -use paths, or other off -road facilities that serve non -
motorized travel
• Installation of publicly available alternative fuel/charging infrastructure
• Addition of passing lanes, truck climbing lanes, or truck brake -check lanes in rural areas that do
not increase overall vehicle capacity along the corridor
FEHR�PEERS
PC RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TO ADOPT THE CEQA TRANSPORTATION
VMT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES FOR PURPOSES OF
ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
("CEQA"), AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION
UNDER CEQA (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO.
LR18-1506)"
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines")
encourage public agencies to develop and publish generally applicable "thresholds of significance"
to be used in determining the significance of a project's environmental effects; and
B. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (a) defines a threshold of significance as "an
identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, non-
compliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the
agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to less than
significant"; and
C. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (b) requires that thresholds of significance must
be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulations, developed through a public review
process, and be supported by substantial evidence; and
D. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (c), when adopting thresholds of
significance, a public agency may consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by
other public agencies provided that the decision of the agency is supported by substantial evidence;
and
E. Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013 and codified in Public Resources Code section
21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the criteria for determining the
significance of transportation impacts of projects; and
F. In 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") proposed, and
the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted, new CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3 that identifies vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") — meaning the amount and distance of
automobile travel attributable to a project — as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's
transportation impacts; and
G. As a result, automobile delay, as measured by "level of service" and other similar
metrics, generally no longer constitutes a significant environmental effect under CEQA; and
H. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 goes into effect on July 1, 2020, though public
agencies may elect to be governed by this section immediately; and
I. Staff worked with Fehr & Peers to revise the City's Traffic Impact Analysis
("TIA") Guidelines and include a VMT Section (CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
("VMT Analysis Guidelines")) to ensure consistency with SB 743; and
J. On April 22, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission,
considered staff s presentation and reviewed the recommended thresholds of significance and the
VMT Analysis Guidelines.
Section 2. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the
following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the adoption of this
resolution:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Planning
Commission has been determined that the adoption of the VMT Thresholds and CEQA
Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines, which is an action consistent with Senate Bill ("SB")
743, will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment, and thus the Thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not subject to CEQA (14
CCR § 15378(a)). In addition, the Thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not a "project"
within the meaning of CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15378(b)(5) and constitute an action involving
procedures for the protection of the environment, which is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14
CCR § 15308. Finally, if the Thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are determined to be
subject to CEQA, they are exempt therefrom because it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that these amendments will have a significant effect on the environment. (14 CCR §
15061(b)(3).)
Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council of Temecula adopt the Resolution attached hereto as Exhibit "A" adopting the CEQA
Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines (which is included as Attachment A to the City Council
resolution) as part of the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines thereby establishing the VMT
thresholds of significance for transportation impact analysis under CEQA.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 22nd day of April, 2020.
Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Luke Watson
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of April,
2020, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Luke Watson
Secretary
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT THE CEQA
TRANSPORTATION VMT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES FOR
PURPOSES OF ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION
IMPACTS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT ("CEQA"), AND MAKING A FINDING OF
EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA (LONG RANGE PLANNING
PROJECT NO. LR18-1506).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine and declare that:
A. The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines")
encourage public agencies to develop and publish generally applicable "thresholds of significance"
to be used in determining the significance of a project's environmental effects; and
B. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (a) defines a thresholds of significance as "an
identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect,
noncompliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the
agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to less than
significant"; and
C. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (b) requires that thresholds of significance must
be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulations, developed through a public review
process, and be supported by substantial evidence; and
D. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (c), when adopting thresholds of
significance, a public agency may consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by
other public agencies provided that the decision of the agency is supported by substantial evidence;
and
E. Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013 and codified in Public Resources Code section
21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the criteria for determining the
significance of transportation impacts of projects; and
F. In 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") proposed, and
the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted, new CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3 that identifies vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") — meaning the amount and distance of
automobile travel attributable to a project — as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's
transportation impacts; and
G. As a result, automobile delay, as measured by "level of service" and other similar
metrics, generally no longer constitutes a significant environmental effect under CEQA; and
H. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 goes into effect on July 1, 2020, though public
agencies may elect to be governed by this section immediately; and
I. Staff worked with Fehr & Peers to revise the City's Traffic Impact Analysis
("TIA") Guidelines and include a VMT Section (CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
("VMT Analysis Guidelines")) to ensure consistency with SB 743; and
J. On April 22, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission,
considered staff s presentation and reviewed the recommended thresholds of significance and the
VMT Analysis Guidelines and recommended that the City Council adopt the VMT Analysis
Guidelines; and
K. On April 23, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Public Traffic Safety
Commission considered staffs presentation and reviewed the recommended thresholds of
significance and the VMT Analysis Guidelines and recommended that the City Council adopt the
VMT Analysis Guidelines.
Section 2. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following
environmental findings and determinations in connection with the adoption of this resolution:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City Council has
been determined that the adoption of the VMT Thresholds and CEQA Transportation VMT
Analysis Guidelines, which is an action consistent with Senate Bill ("SB") 743, will not result in
a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and thus the
thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not subject to CEQA (14 CCR § 15378(a)). In
addition, the thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not a "project" within the meaning of
CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15378(b)(5) and constitute an action involving procedures for the
protection of the environment, which is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15308. Finally,
if the thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are determined to be subject to CEQA, they are
exempt therefrom because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that these
amendments will have a significant effect on the environment. (14 CCR § 15061(b)(3).)
Section 3. Further Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds
the thresholds of significance identified in the VMT Analysis Guidelines have been developed
through a public review process and are supported by substantial evidence, as required by CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.7.
Section 4. Approval of VMT Analysis Guidelines. The City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby adopts the CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" as part of the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines thereby establishing the VMT
thresholds of significance for transportation impact analysis under CEQA.
Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
day of May 2020.
James "Stew" Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING
COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
1989
CASE NO: LR18-1506 APPLICANT: City of Temecula
PROPOSAL: Long Range Project Number LR18-1506 to conform with State Law Senate Bill
("SB") 743 by replacing vehicular Level of Service (LOS) with Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
transportation analysis metric under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving Vehicle
Miles Traveled (VMT) thresholds for California Environmental Quality Act compliance related to
transportation analysis.
ENVIRONMENTAL: The City has the adoption of this Resolution is not a "project" for purposes of
CEQA, as that term is defined by Guidelines Section 15378. Specifically, this Resolution constitutes
organizational or administrative activities of City government that will not result in direct or indirect
physical changes in the environment. (Guidelines Section 15378(b) (5)). Therefore, because it is not a
"project," this Resolution is not subject to CEQA's requirements. Further, even if this Resolution were
deemed a "project" and therefore subject to CEQA, the Resolution would be covered by the general rule
that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment.
(Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3)). As an organizational or administrative activity which do not involve
any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the
environment, this Resolution does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment
and is therefore exempt under this general rule. Further, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, and thus this
Resolution is not subject to CEQA. (Guidelines Section 15061(b) (3)).
CASE PLANNER: Sara Toma, (951) 506-5185
DATE OF HEARING: April 22, 2020 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 p.m.
PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means
consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17,
2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may
be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv.
In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the
meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing on the City's
website — TemeculaCA.gov after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. Due to the
closure of the Library and other City Buildings and Facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the complete
agenda is only viewable on the City website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. For more
information or have questions regarding this project, please contact Sara Toma (951) 506-5185.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required
by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action
or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the
Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the April 22, 2020 Planning
Commission meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the Principal
Management Analyst. Email comments must be submitted to Lynn Lehner at lynn.lehner@temeculaca.gov.
Electronic comments on agenda items for the April 22, 2020 Planning Commission meeting may only be
submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The Principal Management Analyst shall read all email comments, provided
that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide,
consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Planning Commission meeting. The email comments submitted
shall become part of the record of the Planning Commission meeting.
Questions? Please call the Case Planner Sara Toma at (951) 506-5185 or the Community Development
Department at (951) 694-6400.
PC RESOLUTION NO.2020-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE
CEQA TRANSPORTATION VMT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
FOR PURPOSES OF ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION
IMPACTS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT ("CEQA"), AND MAKING A FINDING OF
EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA (LONG RANGE PLANNING
PROJECT NO. LR18-1506)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines")
encourage public agencies to develop and publish generally applicable "thresholds of significance"
to be used in determining the significance of a project's environmental effects; and
B. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (a) defines a threshold of significance as "an
identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, non-
compliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the
agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to less than
significant"; and
C. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (b) requires that thresholds of significance must
be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulations, developed through a public review
process, and be supported by substantial evidence; and
D. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (c), when adopting thresholds of
significance, a public agency may consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by
other public agencies provided that the decision of the agency is supported by substantial evidence;
and
E. Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013 and codified in Public Resources Code section
21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the criteria for determining the
significance of transportation impacts of projects; and
F. In 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") proposed, and
the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted, new CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3 that identifies vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") — meaning the amount and distance of
automobile travel attributable to a project — as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's
transportation impacts; and
G. As a result, automobile delay, as measured by "level of service" and other similar
metrics, generally no longer constitutes a significant environmental effect under CEQA; and
H. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 goes into effect on July 1, 2020, though public
agencies may elect to be governed by this section immediately; and
I. Staff worked with Fehr & Peers to revise the City's Traffic Impact Analysis
("TIA") Guidelines and include a VMT Section (CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
("VMT Analysis Guidelines")) to ensure consistency with SB 743; and
J. On April 22, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission,
considered staff s presentation and reviewed the recommended thresholds of significance and the
VMT Analysis Guidelines.
Section 2. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the
following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the adoption of this
resolution:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Planning
Commission has been determined that the adoption of the VMT Thresholds and CEQA
Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines, which is an action consistent with Senate Bill ("SB")
743, will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment, and thus the Thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not subject to CEQA (14
CCR § 15378(a)). In addition, the Thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not a "project"
within the meaning of CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15378(b)(5) and constitute an action involving
procedures for the protection of the environment, which is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14
CCR § 15308. Finally, if the Thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are determined to be
subject to CEQA, they are exempt therefrom because it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that these amendments will have a significant effect on the environment. (14 CCR §
15061(b)(3).)
Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council of Temecula adopt the Resolution attached hereto as Exhibit "A" adopting the CEQA
Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines (which is included as Attachment A to the City Council
resolution) as part of the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines thereby establishing the VMT
thresholds of significance for transportation impact analysis under CEQA.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 22nd day of April, 2020.
I
M`rj
�mew'w_W14�� J./.►�
.r
ATTEST:
Lu e Watson
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020-10 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of April,
2020, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo,
Watts, Youmans
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
Luke Watson
Secretary
RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA TO ADOPT THE CEQA
TRANSPORTATION VMT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES FOR
PURPOSES OF ANALYZING TRANSPORTATION
IMPACTS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT ("CEQA") AND MAKING A FINDING OF
EXEMPTION UNDER CEQA (LONG RANGE PLANNING
PROJECT NO. (LR18-1506).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine and declare that:
A. The California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines")
encourage public agencies to develop and publish generally applicable "thresholds of significance"
to be used in determining the significance of a project's environmental effects; and
B. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (a) defines a thresholds of significance as "an
identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect,
noncompliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the
agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to less than
significant"; and
C. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (b) requires that thresholds of significance must
be adopted by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulations, developed through a public review
process, and be supported by substantial evidence; and
D. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15064.7 (c), when adopting thresholds of
significance, a public agency may consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by
other public agencies provided that the decision of the agency is supported by substantial evidence;
and
E. Senate Bill 743, enacted in 2013 and codified in Public Resources Code section
21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines regarding the criteria for determining the
significance of transportation impacts of projects; and
F. In 2018, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") proposed, and
the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted, new CEQA Guidelines section
15064.3 that identifies vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") — meaning the amount and distance of
automobile travel attributable to a project — as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's
transportation impacts; and
G. As a result, automobile delay, as measured by "level of service" and other similar
metrics, generally no longer constitutes a significant environmental effect under CEQA; and
H. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 goes into effect on July 1, 2020, though public
agencies may elect to be governed by this section immediately; and
I. Staff worked with Fehr & Peers to revise the City's Traffic Impact Analysis
("TIA") Guidelines and include a VMT Section (CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines
("VMT Analysis Guidelines")) to ensure consistency with SB 743; and
J. On April 22, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission,
considered staff s presentation and reviewed the recommended thresholds of significance and the
VMT Analysis Guidelines and recommended that the City Council adopt the VMT Analysis
Guidelines; and
K. On April 23, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Public Traffic Safety
Commission considered staff s presentation and reviewed the recommended thresholds of
significance and the VMT Analysis Guidelines and recommended that the City Council adopt the
VMT Analysis Guidelines.
Section 2. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following
environmental findings and determinations in connection with the adoption of this resolution:
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City Council has
been determined that the adoption of the VMT Thresholds and CEQA Transportation VMT
Analysis Guidelines, which is an action consistent with Senate Bill ("SB") 743, will not result in
a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and thus the
thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not subject to CEQA (14 CCR § 15378(a)). In
addition, the thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are not a "project" within the meaning of
CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15378(b)(5) and constitute an action involving procedures for the
protection of the environment, which is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15308. Finally,
if the thresholds and VMT Analysis Guidelines are determined to be subject to CEQA, they are
exempt therefrom because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that these
amendments will have a significant effect on the environment. (14 CCR § 15061(b)(3).)
Section 3. Further Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds
the thresholds of significance identified in the VMT Analysis Guidelines have been developed
through a public review process and are supported by substantial evidence, as required by CEQA
Guidelines section 15064.7.
Section 4. Approval of VMT Analysis Guidelines. The City Council of the City of
Temecula hereby adopts the CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" as part of the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines thereby establishing the VMT
thresholds of significance for transportation impact analysis under CEQA.
Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
day of May, 2020.
James Stewart, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of May, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES. COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Item No. 20
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Receive Update to Community Recovery and Reopening Plan and Related Efforts
and Provide General Direction Regarding the Same
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive the update to the Community
Recovery and Reopening Plan and related efforts and provide general direction regarding the same.
BACKGROUND: On April 28, 2020, the City Council met and provided general direction
regarding their preferences for local recovery and reopening efforts as related to the COVID-19
pandemic. They also directed staff to return with a recovery and reopening plan and advocacy
letter for their consideration at a future meeting. On May 12, 2020, a draft plan and letter reflecting
the collective work and review of City staff and community stakeholders, including the Chamber
of Commerce, Visit Temecula Valley, The Promenade and Temecula Valley Hospital was
presented. At that meeting, the City Council approved the Community Recovery and Reopening
Plan and related letter with modifications. They also directed staff to solicit further public
comments on the plan and return at the May 26, 2020 meeting to provide an update. This item was
placed on the agenda accordingly.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: None
Item No. 21
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: City Council Travel/Conference Report
PREPARED BY: Luisa Tovar, Executive Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File.
On March 10, 11, 12, 2020, Mayor James Stewart traveled to Long Beach, CA to attend the
California Park & Recreation Society 2020 Conference and Expo.
ATTACHMENT: Itinerary
CONVECT
1 • NS
CPRS CONFERENCE & EXPO
. t.
w _
Table of Contents
Expo 3 Thursday 13-17 Registration Form
Intensives 4-7 Friday 18-20 Membership Form
Special Features 8-9 Special Events 21-23
Wednesday 10-13 Registration Information 24
Schedule
Tuesday
7:00 a.m. -
2:30 p.m.
Park Development & Operations Symposium
7:00 a.m. -
5:00 p.m.
Parks Make Life Better!® Tour
9:00 a.m. -
4:00 p.m.
CPRS Board of Directors Meeting &
Orientation
10:00 a.m.
- 5:00 p.m.
CAPRA Accreditation Workshop
10:00 a.m.
- 5:00 p.m.
NAYS Youth Sports Administrators Academy
12:30 p.m.
CPRS Golf Tournament
12:30 p.m.
- 5:00 p.m.
Aquatics Intensive: Put the POWER in Your
POOL
1:00 P.M. -
5:00 P.M.
Recreation Intensive: Leadership Survivor
Guide
1:30 p.m. -
5:00 p.m.
Aging Services Intensive: Working with
Older Adults: Present and Future
9:00 a.m. -
5:00 p.m.
Registration Area Open
Wednesday
7:00 a.m.
- 5:30 p.m.
Registration Area Open
8:15 a.m.
- 9:15 a.m.
Conference Rookies
8:15 a.m.
- 9:15 a.m.
Education Sessions
9:45 a.m.
- 11:45 a.m.
Opening General Session
12:00 noon
- 5:00 p.m.
Expo Open - Lunch Provided
2:45 p.m.
- 4:00 p.m.
Education Sessions
4:15 p.m.
- 5:30 p.m.
Education Sessions
6:00 p.m.
- 9:00 p.m.
Welcome Reception
Thursday
25-26
27
7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m.
Wake Up Wellness
7:00 a.m.
- 9:30 a.m.
CPRS Administrators Section - Networking
Breakfast & General Membership Meeting
7:30 a.m.
- 6:30 p.m.
Registration Area Open
8:15 a.m.
- 9:30 a.m.
Education Sessions
9:00 a.m.
- 3:00 p.m.
Expo Open (Lunch provided 12:30 p.m.)
11:00 a.m.
- 12:15 p.m.
Education Sessions
2:45 p.m.
- 4:00 p.m.
Education Sessions
4:15 p.m.
- 5:30 p.m.
Education Sessions
6:00 p.m.
- 8:30 p.m.
Recreation Therapy Intensive
7:00 p.m.
- 10:00 p.m.
Pub Crawl
Friday
7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m.
Wake Up Wellness
7:00 a.m. -
6:30 p.m.
Recreation Therapy Institute
8:00 a.m. -
11:15 a.m.
District/Section Leadership Meeting
8:00 a.m. -12:30
p.m.
Registration Area Open
8:30 a.m. -
10:00 a.m.
Education Sessions
10:15 a.m.
- 11:15 a.m.
Education Sessions
11:30 a.m.
- 12:30 p.m.
Closing Session
6:00 p.m. -
8:30 p.m.
CPRS Annual Awards Reception & Banquet
2 �� CPRS CONFERENCE & EXPO
Item No. 22
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report
PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development
Department monthly report for April 2020.
VIRTUAL TRANSITION
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the virtual shift of many functions of the City, and Community
Development in particular. Community Development, in collaboration with Business License, Fire,
Land Development, Police, and IT, shifted all Permit Center services online in under one week.
IT completed a significant amount of work in three days to enable departments to deliver services
online and allow some staff to work remotely. While this transition occurred, staff was able to
maintain a full suite of permit services.
Building and Safety has begun implementation of virtual inspections utilizing FaceTime. While
keeping the health and safety of staff and the community as the top priority, the division has been
able to increase the volume of inspections conducted, and keep projects moving with this new process.
Community Development was able to resume public hearings and meetings in April by shifting to
completely virtual meetings, conducted via Zoom webinars.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Planning processed 32 new applications and conducted six (6) Public Hearings in April. A detailed
account of planning activities is attached to this report.
Plan Type
April 2020
Long Range Projects
3
Development Plan
4
Home Occupations
13
Minor Exception
1
Modifications
6
Pre -Application
2
Assessory Dwelling Unit
1
Temporary Use Permit
1
Zoning or Planning Letter
1
Total
32
Winchester Hills Specific Plan Amendment (PAs18-0660 and 18-0661): The City is processing a
Specific Plan Amendment to the Winchester Hills Specific Plan for a Residential Overlay within
portions of Planning Area 12 that will allow for up to 1,000 residential units; and a General Plan
Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designations for Planning Area 12 to a
Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) land use. The project is located on the corner of Date Street and
Ynez Road. (COOPER)
Heirloom Farms (PAs 18-0659, 18-0660, 18-0661): The City is processing a Development Plan to
allow for the construction of 321-unit single-family community on 27.86 acres consisting of detached
homes, attached townhomes, and duplexes. Community meetings were held on June 19, 2018 and
February 20, 2020, and further outreach will take place prior to a public hearing. The City is working
with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis. The project is located on the corner of Date
Street and Ynez Road. (COOPER)
Arrive @ Rancho Highlands (PA19-1448): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 270-
unit multi -family community adjacent to the Temecula Duck Pond, southeast of Rancho California
Road on Ynez Road. The project includes leasing offices, clubhouse, fitness center, pool, tot lot, and
dog park. The project is located within the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The project proposes
20% of the units (55 units) as affordable at or below 60% average median income. (COOPER)
Solana Assisted Living (PAs19-0940 and 19-0941): The City is processing a Development Plan and
Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an approximately 90,343 square foot, two story, 105
unit assisted living and memory care facility located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and
Solana Way. The City is working with an environmental consultant to prepare environmental
documents for the proposed project. (COOPER)
Lantern Crest Temecula (PA19-1452): The City is processing a Modification to a previously
approved Development Plan (PA17-0328) for an approximately 524,362 square foot, four-story, 496-
unit, independent and assisted living community. The project site was previously approved as the
WESTliving Assisted Living Facility in the Winchester Hills Specific Plan. (COOPER)
Woodspring Suites (PA20-0072): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately
60,600 square foot, four-story, 130 room Woodspring Suites Hotel located on the west side of
Madison Avenue between Buecking Drive and McCabe Court. (COOPER)
Sommers Bend Home Product Review (PAs 20-0328, 20-0329, and 20-0330): The City is
processing the second phase of a single family residential home product review for Sommers Bend.
The second phase is all age qualified homes encompassing three villages located in PAs 22, 23A, and
24 for a total of 192 units. (COOPER)
Sommers Bend Age Qualified Private Recreation Center (PA20-0278): The City is processing a
Development Plan for the Sommers Bend age qualified private recreation center consisting of an
approximately 11,159 square foot clubhouse building (including a fitness center, multi -purpose room,
and kitchen), pool, spa, pickleball courts, bocce ball, group BBQ, yoga lawn, cabanas, and 45 parking
spaces located within PA23B at Sommers Bend. (COOPER)
Roripaugh Ranch Wingsweep Tract Maps (PAs 20-0567, 20-0568, 20-0569): The City is
processing three Tentative Tract Maps (TTM) for the remaining three non -entitled residential
planning areas of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan: TTM 37925 (PA10) for the creation of 13 single
family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin; TTM 37928 (PA33A) for the creation of 15
single family lots, 5 open space lots, and a water quality basin; TTM 37928 (PA33A) for the creation
of 15 single family lots, 5 open space lots, and a water quality basin. (COOPER)
MS Mountain View Industrial Buildings (PAs 20-0533, 20-0534, 20-0535, and 20-0536): The
City is processing four (4) separate industrial buildings located on individual lots along Avenida
Alvarado. The square footage of each individual building is 15,641 square feet, 14,544 square feet,
15,944 square feet, and 11,824 square feet. (COOPER)
LONG RANGE PLANNING
Old Town Specific Plan Amendment (LR20-0209): Staff is preparing an amendment to the Old
Town Specific Plan to allow for four-story hotels in the Downtown Core District. Currently, outside
of the Hotel Overlay District, the Specific Plan only allows four-story buildings in the Downtown
Core District when at least one floor is residential or when one floor is office and parking is provided
for that floor. Staff worked with Ascent Environmental to prepare an EIR Addendum for the project
and will present the Specific Plan Amendment to the Planning Commission on May 6, 2020, and to
the City Council on May 26, 2020. (FISK)
Old Town Parking Study (LR17-1502): Staff is working with Fehr & Peers to update the 2010 Old
Town Parking Management Plan. The Plan will take a detailed look at existing parking policies,
standards, supply and demand within the study area, as well as the effect that planned future
development and recently approved projects will have on future demand. The study will also identify
strategies and standards for management of the parking supply. Per direction provided by the City
Council Old Town Subcommittee, consisting of Council Members Naggar and Schwank, staff
presented the study findings to the Old Town Local Review Board on October 14, 2019.On December
10, 2019, staff provided an update to the Subcommittee. Staff has presented the findings to the Public
Traffic/Safety Commission and Community Services Commission. Staff will next present the study
findings to the Planning Commission Old Town Subcommittee and then the full Planning
Commission. (JONES)
Objective Design and Development Standards (LR18-1684): The City received an SB 2 Grant
from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to update the Objective
Design and Development Standards for multi -family and mixed -use residential developments, with
the goal of expediting housing production, streamlining approval processes, and establishing the
foundation for future regulations and housing laws. Staff is working on creating Objective Design
Standards that will conform with SB 35, as well as to incorporate objective design guidelines into the
City's Development Code. (TOMA, RABIDOU)
CEQA Traffic Impact Analysis - VMT Thresholds and Guidelines (LR18-1506): The City has
been selected by Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), through the Sustainable
Communities Program, to update the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to facilitate
compliance with SB 743 Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT). The City's TIA Guidelines provide a
methodology for assessing potential traffic and circulation impacts of proposed projects. The
Guidelines use Level of Service (LOS) based on intersection delay to analyze impacts to intersections
and roadway segments. The City will transition the Guidelines from LOS based to VMT based before
the state deadline of July 1, 2020. Staff is working with Fehr & Peers to update the Guidelines to
include VMT methodology, thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures. On January 28 and
April 23, 2020, Staff met with the General Plan Update Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tern
Edwards and Council Member Rahn. The Planning Commission approved the Guidelines on April
22. On April 23, the project was presented to the Public Traffic Safety Commission. The project is
scheduled for City Council on May 26, 2020. (TOMA)
Housing Element Update (LR18-1620 and LR17-1757): The City is working with De Novo
Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the RHNA
process, community engagement, and CEQA. The current Housing Element was certified by the
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation
for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint
for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the
population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of
Mayor Pro Tem Edwards and Council Member Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad
Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Youmans, will serve as advisory bodies
during the process. (WEST, TOMA, PETERS)
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) (LR17-1757): Related and running concurrently with
the Housing Element Update, is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA
planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and will cover the planning period October 2021 through
October 2029. The process will develop the methodology for allocating existing and projected
housing needs for the SCAG Region. SCAG will adopt the RHNA Allocation Methodology and
distribute the RHNA in April 2020. The Final RHNA Allocation will occur in October 2020. (WEST)
Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Park Service on the Waves to Wineries Trail
Plan. The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by
identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. The goals are to identify
existing trails and implement a strategy to fill in the missing links. (PETERS)
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Mission Village Rehabilitation: The City partnered with Affirmed Housing for modifications to
their regulatory agreements on the existing Mission Village Affordable Housing Complex. This will
result in the complete rehabilitation of the complex and secure affordable covenants for an additional
55 years. The modifications to the agreement were approved by City Council on August 13, 2019.
The County Oversight Board approved the modifications on September 5, 2019, and the State
Department of Finance approved the project on October 18, 2019. The construction loan for the
rehabilitation project closed on March 14. As part of the negotiations, the City received an additional
$1.3 million to use towards the development of affordable housing. Construction for the rehabilitation
will begin in 2020. (LEHNER, WATSON)
Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City has received a formal Development Plan for
a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a
community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City is negotiating
a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax
allocation bond proceeds. (LEHNER, RABIDOU, WATSON)
Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA
with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units on
City -owned property on Pujol Street. Temecula Pacific Associates is looking to secure financing from
the State of California prior to the commencement of construction. (LEHNER, WATSON)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
CDBG Administration: The 2020-21 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) was released in
November 2019. Two technical workshops were held for applicants on December 12, 2019. The
Finance Committee provided recommendations for the 2020-21 program on March 10, 2020. City
Council approved the following recommendations on April 28, 2020. (LEHNER)
Finance
Organization
Project Name
Program Description
Committee
Recommendatiot -
Assistance League of Temecula Valley
Operation School Bell
Clothing & supplies for low
$5,491
income students in TVLISD
Boys &Girls Clubs of Southwest County
Before and After School Care
Round trip school transportation;
$5,491
activities before and after school
Support Teams, Inc.
Canine Su
Service Dogs for Disabled
Provide service and assistance
$5,491
Persons
dogs to people with disabilities.
Homeless Prevention and
Connecting homeless individuals
City of Temecula
with services and financial
$20,000
Diversion Program
assistance
Community Mission of Hope
Housing Resource Center
Provide case management for
$5,491
homeless; food pantry
Comprehensive Fair Housing
Fair housing education, training,
Fair Housing Council of Riverside County i
technical assistance; landlord/ i
$20,000
Program
tenant mediation
Hospice of the Valleys
Senior Assistance Program
Provide direct costs of hospice
$5,491
care for senior citizens
Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center
Anti Violence Education and
Provide support and services to
$5,491
Crisis Intervention
survivors of sexual assault
Safe Alternatives for Everyone (SAFE)
Creating SAFE Families
Victim awareness; case
$5,491
management; support for victims
Voices for Children
Court Appointed Special
Case management and advocacy
$5,491
Advocate (CASA) Program
for foster children in Temecula
Total Public Service Funds Requested for 2020-21 $83,928
BUILDING & SAFETY
Building and Safety statistics for April 2020 are highlighted in the following table. Additional
statistics are attached to this report.
Building & Safety Statistics
April 2020
Permits
159
New Single Family Units
0
New Commercial Building
0
Photovoltaic
42
Tenant Improvements
3
Non Construction C of O
5
Number of Active Plan Checks
392
Number of New Plan Checks
134
Number of Finaled Permits
110
Inspections
Inspections Per Day
78.7
Inspections Per Person Per Day
Visitors to Counter
0
New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check
• Truax Hotel (161,586 sf)
• Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 sf)
• Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 sf each)
• Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos)
• iA Robotics (24,659 sf)
• Hotel (38,202 sf) on Jefferson and Winchester
• Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 sf)
• Trinity Lutheran Church Preschool (9,530 sf)
• Temecula Valley Lexus Dealership (54,898 sf)
Certificate of Occupancy
• Familia Restaurant & Grill — 41925 Motor Car Parkway
• Creative Catering — 27525 Ynez Road
CODE ENFORCEMENT
During the month of April, Code Enforcement responded to 128 web inquiries. In addition, the
division opened 112 code cases, conducted 168 inspections, and forwarded 49 referrals.
type of Code Case I April 2020
Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle
4
Vacant Home / Prop. Maintenance / Rodent/ Mal
1
Business or Home Occupation w/o license/CUP
6
Trash and Debris / Dumping
4
Overgrown Vegetation/ Weeds/ Fire Hazard
8
Green Pool / Vector Control /Stagnant Water
' 4
Graffiti
19
Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control
11
Trailer / RV Stored/Boat/Parking
2
Construction w/o Permit/Building Code
5
Encroach Public ROW/Trash Cans
10
Zoning/signs
4
Public Safety & Health
34
Total Number of Cases
112
Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor
foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties.
Foreclosure Tracking
Residential - Default
52
Residential - Foreclosure
Residential - RED
39
Total - Residential
Commercial - Default
0
Commercial - Foreclosure
1
Commercial - RED
3
Total - Commercial
4
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Current Planning Activity Report
2. Community Development Statistics
3. Community Development Charts
PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company
Owner Plan Type
Status
PA20-0501 32045 Calle Marquis 955-123-003 Jaime Cardenas 04/01/2020 04/02/2020
Michael Young
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Young Ventures, LLC: a home occupation business license that provides web and
application development services.
PA20-0503 31173 Strawberry Tree Ln 959-423-079 Jaime Cardenas 04/01/2020 04/02/2020
Ernestine Brown
PL Home
Approved
(Change Of Address)
Occupation
Temecula, CA 92592
Case Title / Description: The Old Town Soap Company, LLC: a home occupation business license to sell
bath, body, and wellness handcrafted person care products.
PA20-0508 33022 Monte Dr 962-420-002 Jaime Cardenas 04/01/2020 04/06/2020
Joshua Hamilton
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: J C H Concrete Designs: a home occupation business license for concrete design
and building services.
PA20-0509 40940 County Center Dr 910-110-088 Jaime Cardenas 04/02/2020
COUNTY PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
CENTER DRIVE
INV
Case Title / Description: AT&T Wireless Electric Meter MOD: a Modification application to allow for the
installation of a new power meter and run new conduits and conductors to the existing wireless facility
equipment located at 40940 County center Drive.
PA20-0510 40830 Winchester Rd 910-320-033 Scott Cooper 04/06/2020 04/07/2020
Gary Seward RR
MAJESTIC PL Modifications
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Construction
EMPIRE
HOLDINGS
Case Title / Description: Phil's BBQ Downspouts MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to revise
previously approved elevations to Phil's BBQ to include architecturally integrated downspouts located at
40830 Winchester Rd.
PA20-0511 41850 Shorewood Ct 921-581-022 Jaime Cardenas 04/06/2020 04/07/2020
Daniel Rivas
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Temecula Drain Service & Plumbing: a home occupation business license for drain
and plumbing related services.
PA20-0512 30065 Via Velez PI 944-152-011 Jaime Cardenas 04/06/2020 04/07/2020
John Kizziar
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Fix Right Roof Repair: a home occupation business license for roof repair services.
Page 1 of 5
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company Owner
Plan Type
Status
PA20-0514 28588 Old Town Front St 922-033-021 Eric Jones 04/08/2020
Ronald Darling Ronald Darling
PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: OTT Development, LP Minor Modification (Planning Review Only): A Minor
Modification to allow for fee revisions for an existing three-story structure located at 28588 Old Town Front
Street.
PA20-0515 30070 Corte Coelho 919-450-035 Eric Jones 04/08/2020
William Farrell William Farrell
PL Secondary
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Dwelling Unit
Case Title / Description: Farrell Accessory Dwelling Unit: An accessory dwelling unit application for a site
located at 30070 Calle Coelho.
PA20-0516 31700 Temecula Pky 959-080-026 Scott Cooper 04/29/2020
Andrew Van Loy TEMECULA
PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
VALLEY
HOSPITAL INC
Case Title / Description: TVH SW Parking Lot Expansion Landscaping: Landscaping for parking lot
expansion for Temecula Valley Hospital in the southwest corner of existing parking area.
PA20-0519 964-640-019 Scott Cooper 04/13/2020 04/13/2020
Ryan Cummins WOODSIDE 05S
PL Modifications
Approved
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA31 B MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to move
window locations on Plan 1 and to add a side elevation for an optional outdoor room on the left side of Plan 2
for PA31 B in Sommers Bend.
PA20-0520 31901 Campanula Way 959-390-016 Jaime Cardenas 04/13/2020 04/23/2020
Bahea Bratcher Campanula Way
PL Zoning or
Completed
Temecula, CA 92592
Owner
Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: A Zoning Letter for The Vineyards at Paseo Del Sol apartments with assessor's
parcel number 959-390-016.
PA20-0521 29363 Rancho California Rd 944-330-011 Jaime Cardenas 04/13/2020 04/24/2020
Amanda Fietz Costa Mesa
PL Temporary
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Grocery Inv
Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Kenny's Strawberry Stand TUP: a temporary use permit to allow temporary
strawberry vending at the former Marie Callender's parking lot located at 29363 Rancho California through
June 30, 2020.
PA20-0524 32205 Corte Utnehmer 959-352-028 Jaime Cardenas 04/15/2020 04/16/2020
Masami Tokuda
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: MTB Financial: a home occupation business license for bookkeeping services.
PA20-0526 40233 Donomore Ct 919-370-025 Jaime Cardenas 04/15/2020 04/16/2020
Andrea Ayers
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Ayers Electric: a home occupation business license for commercial electrical
contracting services.
Page 2 of 5
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant
Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA20-0528 41200 Promenade 953-213-023 Jaime Cardenas 04/15/2020 04/16/2020
Tracy Enalen
PL Home Approved
Chardonnay Hills
Occupation
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Tracy Enalen: a home occupation business license for individual marriage and
family therapy services.
PA20-0530 916-400-064 Scott Cooper 04/17/2020
Santee Senior
Santee Senior Harveston SAB PL Minor Plan Review
Retirement
Retirement South Exception
Case Title / Description: Lantern Crest ME: A Minor Exception for the Lantern Crest project (PA19-1452) for
a 4'-9" increase in building height for tower architectural elements. The project is located at the southeast
corner of Date Street and Ynez Road.
PA20-0533 909-290-001 Scott Cooper 04/20/2020
Mario Calvillo
RidgeView
PL Development
Plan Review
Business Park
Plan
Dev
Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 1 DP: A Development Plan for an approximately 15,641
square foot industrial building located at the terminus of Tierra Alta Way on the south side of Avenida Alvarado
PA20-0534 909-290-004 Scott Cooper 04/20/2020
Mario Calvillo
RidgeView
PL Development
Plan Review
Business Park
Plan
Dev
Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 2 DP: A Development Plan for an approximately 14,544
square foot industrial building located approximately 470 feet west of Tierra Alta Way on the south side of
Avenida Alvarado
PA20-0535 909-290-005 Scott Cooper 04/20/2020
Mario Calvillo
RidgeView
PL Development
Plan Review
Business Park
Plan
Dev
Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 2 DP: A Development Plan for an approximately 15,944
square foot industrial building located approximately 715 feet west of Tierra Alta Way on the south side of
Avenida Alvarado
PA20-0536 909-290-057 Scott Cooper 04/20/2020
Mario Calvillo
RidgeView
PL Development
Plan Review
Business Park
Plan
Dev
Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 2 DP: A Development Plan for an approximately 15,944
square foot industrial building located approximately 730 feet west of Tierra Alta Way on the north side of
Avenida Alvarado
Page 3 of 5
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company
Owner Plan Type
Status
PA20-0542 27588 Dandelion Ct 920-170-016 Jaime Cardenas 04/20/2020 04/21/2020
Molly Stark
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Tres Chic Affairs: a home occupation business license for wedding and event
planning and coordinating services.
PA20-0545 28915 Davenport Ct 916-353-012 Jaime Cardenas 04/22/2020
Alex DeeLeeuw
DONALD PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
ADAMS
Case Title / Description: 28915 Davenport MOD: a modification application to enclose the exterior front
patio to increase the interior space of the home located at 28915 Davenport Court.
PA20-0550 30640 Linden Ct 919-520-002 Jaime Cardenas 04/23/2020 04/23/2020
Kendall King
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Kendall King: a home occupation business license for social media management
for attorneys and small law firms.
PA20-0552 29940 Longvale Ct 944-040-001 Jaime Cardenas 04/23/2020 04/23/2020
Maria Ignacia
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Ramsey-Moya
Occupation
Case Title / Description: DS Enterprises Commercial Cleaning Service: a home occupation business license
to manage a commercial cleaning and custodial services.
PA20-0553 43127 Corte Calanda 955-172-007 Jaime Cardenas 04/24/2020 04/27/2020
Dustin Singler
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Singler Photography: a home occupation business license for wedding and event
photography services.
PA20-0557 44706 Calle Lopez 960-123-016 Jaime Cardenas 04/28/2020 04/28/2020
Marcella Caldwell
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Marcella Caldwell: a home occupation business license for wedding and event
photographic services.
PA20-0564 40983 Promenade 953-315-002 Jaime Cardenas 04/30/2020 05/05/2020
Joseph R. Wilson
PL Home
Approved
Chardonnay Hills
Occupation
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: AccTax Biz, Inc.: a home occupation business license for tax planning, reparation,
accounting & CFO consulting services.
PREAPP20-0 26680 Ynez Rd 921-680-017 Jaime Cardenas 04/09/2020 04/23/2020
Nathan Eady
ALI ENERGY PL
Completed
517 Temecula, CA 92591
Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: Shell Hydrogen Fuel Station: a pre -application for a proposed hydrogen fuel station
at the northeast portion of the site at the existing Shell gas station located at 26680 Ynez Road. Development
would include an approximately 600 square foot enclosure containing aboveground gas storage tubes, a
compressor/chiller, and associated electrical and communications equipment.
Page 4 of 5
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PREAPP20-0 964-640-015 Scott Cooper 04/16/2020 05/06/2020 Trent Heiner WOODSIDE 05S PL Completed
531 Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend Density Core Pre-App: A Pre -Application for a 378 unit multi -family
development consisting of 170 townhomes, 100 auto court duplexes, and 108 bungalows three packs located
in PAs 28 & 29 of Sommers Bend
PREAPP20-0 27731 Diaz Rd 921-030-001 Jaime Cardenas 04/30/2020
563 Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: 27731 Diaz Parking Lot: a pre -application to review a proposed parking lot
expansion of 290 new parking spaces to the property with an existing building located at 27731 Diaz Road.
Ryan Waufle Pasco Laret DIAZ RE PL Plan Review
Suiter&Assoc., HOLDINGS Pre -Application
Inc.
Page 5 of 5
Community Development Statistics - Previous 12 Months
5/19
6/19
7/19
8/19
9/19
10/19
11/19
12/19
1/20
2/20
3/20
4/20
12 Month
Total/Average
BUILDING AND SAFETY
Inspections
1,828
1,393
1,552
1,862
1,897
2,072
1,591
1,606
1,788
1,999
1,025
1,754
20,367
Inspections Per Day
79.47
69.65
70.54
84.63
82.47
90.08
88.38
82.36
85.14
105.2
44.1
78.7
79
Inspections Per Person Per Day
19.86
17.41
17.63
21.15
16.49
22.52
20.1
20.6
21.29
26.3
20.1
19.9
20
Permits
252
257
293
372
241
296
260
288
270
280
336
159
3,304
New SFR Permits
8
3
9
16
1
41
57
64
0
35
39
0
273
New Projects in Plan Check
128
148
159
129
142
151
163
129
124
63
142
392
1,870
Number of Permits Finaled
170
151
147
163
159
185
160
206
216
160
120
110
1,947
Photovoltaic Permits
65
49
71
86
63
60
88
85
35
71
72
42
787
Non Construction C of 0
26
39
23
28
27
30
19
27
35
28
20
5
307
Tenant Improvements w/ C of 0
15
8
19
15
10
13
9
5
13
8
8
3
126
PLANNING
Public Hearings
2
3
2
4
3
3
5
1
3
8
0
6
40
Planning Applications*
32
36
34
25
30
38
41
48
29
35
30
32
410
Conditional Use Permits
2
3
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
Development Plans
0
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
4
12
Extensions of Time
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
General Plan Amendments
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Maps
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Massage Permits
4
3
3
3
1
5
9
11
2
0
0
0
41
Modifications
11
11
18
12
14
16
11
17
5
10
13
6
144
Planned Dev. Overlays
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Secondary Dwelling Unit
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
4
2
1
1
14
Specific Plans - New
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Specific Plans - Amendments
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Temporary Use Permits
4
3
3
5
2
4
4
6
4
6
9
1
51
LR Applications Initiated
1
1
0
1
3
2
4
5
4
6
1
3
31
Pre -Applications
5
6
3
2
6
1
5
3
7
4
3
2
47
Community Development Statistics - Previous 12 Months
5/19
6/19
7/19
8/19
9/19
10/19
11/19
12/19
1/20
2/20
3/20
4/20
12 Month
Total/Average
CODE ENFORCEMENT
Code I nspections
884
971
432
310
389
439
299
466
321
303
236
168
5,218
Code Enforcement Cases
135
137
194
129
198
179
105
74
129
119
127
112
1,638
Vehicle Abatement Cases
3
6
6
0
7
3
9
3
3
3
5
4
52
Annual Fire Inspection Code Cases
1
0
5
8
4
2
2
3
4
7
5
0
41
Weed Abatement Cases
34
15
28
17
16
20
9
0
12
9
8
8
176
ADMINISTRATION
Visitors to C Desk
1,102
1,067
1,072
1,112
999
1,232
928
979
1,211
1,038
363
0
11,103
Records Requests Processed
35
26
29
24
13
31
24
13
11
21
29
35
291
My CivicApp Inquiries
82
79
61
43
74
90
56
59
78
97
144
134
997
ECONOMIC INDICATORS
Residential - Default
47
52
53
58
55
56
53
53
53
54
61
52
647
Residential - Foreclosed
73
63
58
51
55
60
60
60
61
62
60
58
721
Residential REO
53
52
50
46
44
41
42
42
41
42
40
39
532
Commercial - Default
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
0
0
13
Commercial - Foreclosed
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
5
Commercial - REO
3
3
3
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
36
Home Occupations
37
26
23
28
21
22
24
27
55
43
20
13
339
* does not include Home Occupations
Communing Devebpmenl
Perlormance Reporl
APRIL
2020
Building Inspections
2000 1828 1862 1897
2072 1999
1788 1754
1552
1591 1606
y
AVG
1500 1393
1697
1025
1000
500
OTAL
0
20,367
5/19 6/19 7119 8/19 9/19
10/19 11119 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
New Building Permits
1 372
300 293 296
252 257 241 260 288 270 280 AVG
200 275
159
100 OTAL
0 iti 3304
5/19 6/19 7119 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12119 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
Finaled Permirs
216
200 185
206 AVG
170 163
150 151 147 159 160 160 162
120 110
100
OTAL
50
1947
0
IA R
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1120 2/20 3/20 4/20
Planning Applications
40
20
36 34
32 1 F OR
38
30
25 ■
48
41 W
35
29 30 32
0
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
ModiFicahons
1
15
10
5
0
8
17
14
16 AVG
13
11 11 12 11 1 2
10
5 OTAL
144
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
Pre -Applications
5
2.5
A
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
.. A pre -application is an informal, free, and helpful tool for
you applicants to receive comments on potential projects.
Code Enforcement Cases
200 194 198
179
150 135 137
129 129 127
119 112
105
100
74
50
01
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4120
Code Enforcement Inspections
R7A
1000
750
500
250
0
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
Vehicle Abatement Cases
7.5
5
2.5
0
Q136
OTAL
1638
AVG
434
OTAL
5218
9
7 AVG
6 6
5 4.4
4
3 3 3 3 3
OTAL
0 52
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11119 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
. Did That you can report Code concerns via the City's app?
Visitors ro the C Desk
1 1232
100
50
1211
a 1038
0 11 1 ■ AW = = = ■ o
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
Records Requests Processed
35
31
30 29 29
26
24 24
21
20
13 4 13
11
10
0
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12119 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
Mg CivicApp Inquiries
AVG
925
0OTAL
11,103
150 144
134 AVG
100 90 97 83
82 79 74 78
61 56 59
50 43 OTAL
997
0
5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20
IF ''� The Community Development Desk, or C-Desk, is a one -
you knstop shop for development!
C7 1
ea
Item No. 23
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: John Crater, Division Chief
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report
PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly
Report
OF T E MFCG
•G1 {y
a City of Temecula Fire Department Report
1989
Incidents Reported for the month of April 2020 and City of Temecula and Both (Code 2, Alpha, Omega Code 3, Charlie, Delta, Bravo, Echo)
■ False Alarm
60 10.3%
Haz Mat
1
0.2°%
Medical
417
71.9%
Other Fire
7
1.2%
■ Other Misc
7
1 2%
Public Senice Assist 33
5.7°%
Res Fire
3
0.5°%
N Rescue
1
0.2°%
• Ringing Alarm
6
1.0°%
• Standby
12
2.1°%
Traffic Colfsion
29
5.0%
Vehicle Fire
2
0.3°%
Wldland Fire
2
0.3°%
Total:
580 100.0%
False Alarm
60
Haz Mat
1
Medical
417
Other Fire
7
Other Misc
7
Public Service Assist
33
Res Fire
3
Rescue
1
Ringing Alarm
6
Standby
12
Traffic Collision
29
Vehicle Fire
2
Wildland Fire
2
Incident Total; 580
�1 y.
4
1989
City of Temecula Fire Department Report L,
• 0
••w a
r • % • w� • . s1:r,,-5
• • • • evc� Nasa
• • •y. , r:.,.
• • • • • ••
40,
r «.
.••. •
• • • • �3• • • • •• •
.48
• • •�• w • _ -
•• • r • i � •
tit-
setir �.,�zz• • r-�; � >. aeon a: • • `i • • •
j '�_"�• • • • • ••_ •
r Jiy{ u�a *1 • • • i • • • N • ��
•
�x,
I f •
so
Call Comparison for Month and year to date
3
Month 2019 YTD 2020 YTD
April 741 580
Year Total 2925 2844
Legend
• Fka • MQtllcal Rinerz itle Coirrty Fie Stettin
• Hezvtl • Othc Msc
Hez Met • PSA Reservatims ' cosines
F T EMFCG
•G1 19
City of Temecula Fire Department Report1989
,H�o�
Fire Department Prevention Plan Review and Inspections
Review and Inskl=pections April Yeadate7
Plan Review 176 1053
Construction Inspections 84 632
Annual Inspections 742 1802
Counter/Public Inquiries 0 436
rMan
y
,..nPH d, .. I ■
Item No. 24
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Zachary Hall, Chief of Police
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (April 2020)
PREPARED BY: Steve DaSilva, Lieutenant
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for the month of
April 2020.
PATROL SERVICES
Overall calls for police service 7,578
"Priority One" calls for service 46
Average response time for "Priority One" calls 4.74
VOLUNTEERS
Chaplain 4
Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 0
Reserve officer hours (patrol) 4
Explorer 0
Station/Administration 64
Total Volunteer hours 72
CRIME PREVENTION
Crime prevention workshops
N/A
Neighborhood watch meetings conducted
N/A
Safety presentations/Training
N/A
Special events
N/A
Residential/Business security surveys conducted
N/A
Businesses visited
N/A
Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up
N/A
Station Tour
N/A
Planning Review Projects
N/A
Temp Outdoor Use Permits
N/A
Sq. Footage of Graffiti Removed
N/A
Total customers served 35
Fingerprints/Live Scans 3
Police reports filed 52
Citations signed off 2
Total receipts $1,889
SPECIAL TEAMS (PROBLEM ORIENTED POLICING)
On sight felony arrests
1
On sight misdemeanor arrests
0
Felony arrest warrants served
0
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
1
Follow-up investigations
14
Parole/Probation Searches
0
Pedestrian Checks
5
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks
48
Crime Free Housing Checks
16
SPECIAL TEAMS (HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM)
On sight felony arrests
On sight misdemeanor arrests
1
Felony arrest warrants served
0
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
0
Area Checks
0
Camp Checks
980
Pedestrian Checks (New Contacts)
55
Follow-up Checks (Old Contacts)
15
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks...
7
SPECIAL TEAMS (SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM)
On sight felony arrests
0
On sight misdemeanor arrests
7
Felony arrest warrants served
0
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
0
Follow-up investigations
4
Parole/Probation Searches
5
Pedestrian Checks
14
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks...
11
Marijuana Dispensary Checks
0
SPECIAL TEAMS (Burglary Suppression Team)
Felony arrests
6
Felony filings
8
Total Cases Assigned
23
Total Cases Closed
32
Search Warrants Served
16
TRAFFIC
Citations issued for hazardous violations 41
Non -hazardous citations
8
Parking citations
64
Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations
2
Seatbelts
2
Cell Phone Cites
5
Injury collisions
10
D.U.I. Arrests
11
Grant funded D.U.I. / Traffic safety checkpoints
0
Grant funded traffic click it or ticket
0
INVESTIGATIONS
Beginning Caseload
176
Total Cases Assigned
23
Total Cases Closed
29
Search Warrants Served
10
Arrests
1
Out of Custody Filings
3
PROMENADE MALL TEAM
Calls for service
142
Felony arrest/filings
0
Misdemeanor arrest/filings
0
Traffic Citations
0
Fingerprints/Live Scans
16
Total receipts
$800
SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS
Felony arrests N/A
Misdemeanor arrests N/A
Reports N/A
Citations N/A
Meetings/Presentations N/A
***Schools Closed Month of April***
Item No . 25
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: May 26, 2020
SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for
Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report
may also be viewed on the City's website at:
hlt2://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-improvement-Projects-CIP
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CIRCULATION PROJECTS
Butterfield Stage Road Extension - Phase III, PW15-11
Description: Widening of Butterfield Stage Road from La Serena Way to Rancho California Road, which includes
widening of Rancho California Road to four lanes through the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road
(Riverside County is a partner on this major circulation project).
Cost: $8,018,372
Status: Construction began on June 10, 2019.
Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25
Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry
Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch may be widened, extended, and/or improved to
create a contiguous Major Arterial segment.
Cost: $4,566,513
Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — May 2021. Current activities include development
and review of preliminary design alternatives.
French Valley Parkway / Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01
Description: Design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the
Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction
with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215.
Cost: $137,356,246
Status: Currently in design. Work continues on the environmental re-evaluation.
1
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02
Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula
Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp.
Cost: $7,775,000
Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — May 2021. Current activities include aerial
photogrammetry, field surveys, geotechnical and materials reports, traffic operations analyses, preliminary
structural and roadway design, and initiation of noise study work program.
Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08
Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route
79 South.
Cost: $51,959,957
Status: Construction complete. Working with Caltrans on project closeout and acceptance. Project information is
available on the project website: www.1579South.info
Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05
Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road
and Winchester Road.
Cost: $14,307,394
Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. Request for
Authorization of Preliminary Engineering submitted to Caltrans on March 14, 2018. Design consultant has
been selected through the RFP process. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers
Inc. at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Design is underway. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved
by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. Pre -application meeting with RCA was held in
November 2019. First Joint Project Review (JPR) environmental submittal to RCA is anticipated in Spring
of 2020 and CEQA approval in Fall of 2020
oil
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Ynez Road (Winchester to Date), Equity Drive, County
Center Drive Loop, and Winchester Road (Nicolas to Easterly City Limits), PW18-01
Description: Rehabilitation of Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Date Street, Equity Drive and County Center Drive
loop, and Winchester Road from Nicolas Road to easterly City Limits.
Cost: $568,946.76
Status: Currently on hold awaiting completion of Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and Developer
improvements.
Pavement Rehabilitation Program — West Side Business Park Area, PW19-17
Description: Rehabilitation of Zevo Drive, Rio Nedo Road, Avenida Alvarado, Via Dos Picos, Business Park Drive, Del
Rio Road, Calle Cortez, Las Haciendas Street, Enterprise Circle North, and Via Montezuma from Murrieta
Creek to Jefferson Avenue.
Cost: $2,200,000
Status: Currently in design. Construction September 2020 — February 2021.
Pechanga Parkway Widening, PW15-14
Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11
Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project
also includes relocating the access of the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from
Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane.
Cost: $1,032,674
Status: The project is currently in design.
3
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Ynez Road Improvements, PW17-17
Description This project includes widening Ynez Road, from Rancho Vista Road to La Paz Street, to two lanes in each
direction, and the completion of missing segments of curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscape medians,
streetlights and modification of the traffic signal at Santiago Road.
Cost: $4,571,766
Status: Design is at 60%. The design is scheduled to be completed during the FY 2020-2021.
M
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Bike Lane and Trail Program — Bike Pump Track, PW 18-04
Description: Bicycle Pump Track at Ronald Reagan Sports Park.
Cost: $380,000
Status: Project is complete and has been accepted by the City Manager.
Citywide Streetlight Acquisition and Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit, PW17-18
Description: The purchase and acquisition of 7,279 light poles, including Phases 1, 2 & 3, of the Southern California
Edison (SCE) streetlights has been completed. Effective November 12, 2019, the City has assumed
ownership, and operations and maintenance of the streetlight poles located within the City limits. The
lighting retrofit will include retrofitting the purchased lights with an energy efficient Light Emitting Diode
(LED) lighting system and the installation of a wireless lighting control node system for all streetlights
Citywide. This groundbreaking technology for street and roadway lighting allows for remote operation and
monitoring of all fixtures through a Web -enabled central management system, this system was activated
on February 6, 2020 for initial configuration and testing.
Cost: $8,003,311
Status: The purchase and acquisition of streetlights from SCE is complete. The LED retrofit is underway and is
anticipated to be complete in Spring 2020.
Expanded Recycled Water Conversion Project, PW17-29
Description: The project includes the administration, design and construction of six (6) sites within the City for the
conversion of water facilities from potable to recycled water. This effort is in cooperation with Rancho
California Water District (RCWD) to administer the implementation of improvements in association with the
State of California Department of Water Resources Proposition 84 Grant Agreement.
Cost: $568,039
Status: The City Council awarded the recycled water retrofit construction contract to Marina Landscape, Inc. in the
amount of $329,000 at the January 14, 2020 meeting. Construction is anticipated to begin in late March
2020.
5
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19
Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula
Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe.
Cost: $3,887,550
Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — December 2020. Current activities include 60% design
plans and preparation of environmental revalidation studies.
Library Parking — Phase II, PW13-09
Description: Design and construction of an expansion of the current on -site parking facility.
Cost: $3,296,896
Status: Construction was completed in March 2020.
Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21
Description: Construction of a new recreation center in Margarita Community Park in place of the former YMCA building.
Includes demolition of the existing building and pool, and construction of a new building, as determined by
a feasibility study. Phase II includes the design and construction of an expansion of the current on -site
parking facility.
Cost: $8,656,508
Status: Concept Designs for Bridging Documents are underway. Design -Build Team Prequalification responses
were received on December 18, 2019 and staff is recommending to pre -qualify six firms at the February
25, 2020 City Council meeting. RFP for Design -Build Team is expected to be completed in April 2020 but
project is on hold until further notice.
Old Town Parking Structure, PW17-15
Description: Design and eventual construction of a new parking facility in Old Town. The Old Town Parking Management
Plan will outline a number of parking strategies best suited to serve Old Town Temecula.
Cost: $1,000,000
Status: Parking study is being updated.
X
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04
Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to
the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15
and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta
Creek trail.
Cost: $6,288,595
Status: Design is being finalized and the environmental document has been initiated. The California Transportation
Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP)
Augmentation funds for this project. Currently processing application for Caltrans Streamlined Oversite
and Encroachment Permit/Plan Check with Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC). Anticipate design to
be completed in February 2020. Resubmittal of Environmental Documents to RCA took place on January
2, 2020. ISMND circulation is scheduled for February 14 with City Council approval in April of 2020. CTC
request for construction fund authorization to be submitted in April for a June 2020 allocation; construction
bidding would follow shortly thereafter.
Sidewalks — Citywide (Third Street), PW17-24
Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side of Third Street, between Old Town Front Street and
Mercedes Street and the west side of Mercedes Street from Third Street for approximately 150' to the north.
Portion adjacent to the proposed parking structure for the hotel will be completed by private developer.
Cost: To be determined
Status: Design is almost complete. Project cannot be constructed until the Truax Hotel parking structure is under
construction due the change in street grade.
Sidewalks — Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement, PW17-16
Description: Replace boardwalk plank boards with colored concrete sidewalk.
Cost: $1,112,563
Status: Construction Contract was awarded at City Council meeting on June 25, 2019. Construction started on
August 12, 2019. Construction expected to be completed in May 2020.
Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28
Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road.
Cost: $198,920
Status: Project currently in design.
7
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
Community Recreation Center (CRC) Pool Site Enhancements and Renovations, PW18-02
Description: Removal and replacement of pool decking, pool re -plaster, and installation of an enhanced lighting system
with energy efficient LED fixtures.
Cost: $1,538,880
Status: Complete. Acceptance of the project and filing the Notice of Completion occurred at the 02/25/2020 City
Council meeting. Project is complete.
Eagle Soar Splash Pad Control System Renovation — FY 19-20
Description: The project provides for the renovation and updating of the splash pad control system to meet current
Health & Safety requirements.
Cost: $300,000
Status: Control system design and scope of work completed. Preparing RFP documents and expect posting on
PlanetBids mid -March.
Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10
Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and
fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site.
Cost: $1,280,284
Status: Preparation of the environmental document is underway. Evaluating construction alternatives to lessen
environmental mitigation requirements. Geotechnical investigation for design alternatives performed in
mid -August 2019. Geotechnical report received October 1, 2019. Redesign started in February of 2020.
Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06
Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball
Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Butterfield Stage Park and Vail Ranch
Park.
Cost: $1,127,800
Status: Project is currently in design.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing, FY19/20
Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and
federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks.
Cost: $1,468,504.24
Status: Working with playground vendors on next round of playground renovations & replacements for Sam Hicks,
John Magee, Stephen Michael Linen, and Winchester Creek Parks. Design conceptual drawings and
pricing scheduled for review by sub -committee on 02/11/2020.
Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03
Description: Design and construction of the restroom building expansion, including adding stalls and urinals. It also
includes renovating the snack bar, and enlarging the storage case.
Cost: $725,000
Status: Project is currently in design.
Sports Court Resurfacing — FY19/20
Description: Repairs and resurfacing of sport court surfacing at various parks and facilities. This includes tennis courts,
basketball courts, and hockey rinks at various parks.
Cost: $100,000
Status: Repairs and court resurfacing completed at Margarita Community Park tennis and pickleball court
conversion, Ronald Reagan hockey rink, Patricia Birdsall basketball courts, Pala Park tennis and basketball
courts, and Winchester Creek Park basketball courts. Total project cost $96,327.
Sports Field Lighting — Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion — FY19/20
Description: Replacement of aging sports field lighting components with new LED technology at various sports parks.
Cost: $452,176
Status: Purchase of parts and equipment for Paloma Del Sol Park sports lighting LED retrofit from Musco Lighting
was approved by City Council November 12, 2019 ($269,700.00). Installation contract awarded to RMF
Contracting for $53,763 in January 2020. Installation scheduled for February 2020.
9
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS
Hilton Garden Inn
Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 66,991 square foot, three-story, 104 room
Hilton Garden Inn Hotel with underground parking and additional off -site parking located approximately
north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue.
Status: Permit issued October 4, 2019. Ongoing review of project by the Land Development division.
Margarita and De Portola Road
Description: Grading Plan to allow for the construction of a two-story 18,621 square foot office building.
Status: Permit issued December 21, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division.
Mexico Cafe
Description: Grading plan and Street Improvement Plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 13,375 square
foot Mexico Cafe restaurant south of the Temecula Parkway and Pechanga Parkway intersection.
Status: Permit issued September 13, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division.
Rancho Soleo (Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road)
Description: Grading plan to allow for the final map and construction of a 245-unit multi -family development.
Status: Permit issued October 16, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division. Anticipated completion of models in February 2020.
10
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
May 26, 2020
LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued)
Sommers Bend (formerly Roripaugh Ranch)
Description: Land Development oversight of the following submittals in plan check: Final Map reviews, Community
Sports Park Improvement Plan, Sommers Bend — Rough Grading Plan; Street Improvement Plan; Storm
Drain Improvement Plan; Street Light Plan; Signing & Striping Plan.
Status: Permit issued September 27, 2018. Loop road currently being paved. Ongoing review and inspections of
project by the Land Development division. Anticipated completion of models in Spring of 2020.
Staybridge Suites
Description: Grading plan to allow for an approximately 90,832 square foot, 4-story, 125-room Staybridge Suites hotel
located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue.
Status: Permit issued March 11, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division.
Temecula Village
Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of a 160-unit apartment community located on the south side of
Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Drive.
Status: Permit issued June 27, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division.
11
ELECTRONIC COMMENTS
SUBMITTED FOR THE
RECORD
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 8, 2020 1:35 PM
To:Not Serf
Subject:RE: 4th of July Fireworks Display
Will do – thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Not Serf <
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 1:26 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Cc: Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Greg Butler <greg.butler@temeculaca.gov>; Peter Thorson
<pthorson@rwglaw.com>; Kevin Hawkins <kevin.hawkins@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Re: 4th of July Fireworks Display
Thank you for your response, and forwarding. I didn't expect such a quick reply.
I think it will be fine to be read on the 26th, but ask that the date it's written be noted, since things are likely to change
by then.
If it's acceptable, could we use the message below instead, which contains some fixes, and revised wording? I wrote the
original late at night in haste, and I feel some of my choices of words were too careless or impolite.
Thank you so much!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Randi and the City Council,
This is my first time writing since I usually feel like our city council normally does a very good job representing
our people. I write today to voice my opinion that the decision to forego the advice of staff, and vote to have
the 4th of July fireworks display is not good representation of the city.
Having a 4th of July fireworks celebration is not what our city or country needs, and to many, it's not even
something we want at the moment.
2
We understand that a lot of people are continuing to gather and going about life “mostly-as-usual” with
minimal change. That is why we have forced stay at home orders and closed parks, as the state tries to follow
the CDC guidance amidst protests. We are in a battle with a common enemy, a serious virus. This is not a
political fight. We all want to get back to work, help the economy, and celebrate life again when we have
reached the point where it's safe.
I am friends with many healthcare workers who are putting their lives on the line daily, and we are hoping and
praying that we can get past this pandemic quickly. We are all itching to share our homes with friends again,
to meet, greet, and dine together again, but they remind us to stay vigilant. They have story after story about
how families are suddenly losing loved ones. One friend just recently had these patients: An entire family of
four who caught the virus. The mom died first, knowing her husband wasn't going to make it, leaving two
surviving small children without a mom and dad. They were a very nice family, and one of the nurses dropped
her guard, got too close, and has also caught the virus. These are real people. Real stories. Real people are
unemployed at record levels. These are truly difficult times in various ways, however it’s not comparable to
the 2008 economic recession.
The 2008 4th of July was an invitation to all, employed or unemployed. A uniting event. In 2020, the firework
display would only serve as an invitation to those who aren’t concerned with social distancing. The whole city
will hear the fireworks, but only a fraction of the city will appreciate what they represent.
4th of July fireworks are not going to help the sick or jobless feel better in 2020. It's not going to inspire hope.
They would be a sign that we are NOT united as a nation to defeat the virus. It's a sign to some people that the
city approves gathering again, approves disregarding the CDC, and solidify the division among the populace.
People love the fireworks, and will gather if they are held, and others will be upset at the gatherings. I truly
wish we could rely on people being personally responsible, but we have ample evidence that people are
neglecting their responsibility.
The USA represents a set of ideals, not "rockets red glare" as council member Naggar mentioned. This is a war
against a virus, not a war against tyranny. If someone "cannot imagine the 4th of July without fireworks", then
try imagining July 3rd or 5th, but with way more people displaying their patriotism over social media instead
of flooding parks and backyards that are firework-adjacent. Many people are missing their birthdays right
now, in order to preserve the greater public health. The USA will continue to be strong without fireworks on
its birthday, maybe it will be stronger than ever if it’s citizens can unite to a cause.
The city should stand united with the countries plight, and not add risk for "bright lights that pop". They just
aren't important right now.
I hope things are better by July, but if it's not, it's my opinion that decisions like this are the heart of the
problem.
Best regards,
Anonymous in Paloma Del Sol, Temecula
3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 7:56 AM Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> wrote:
Thank you for your comments below. The regular meeting of May 12th is cancelled so I will not be able to read this at
that time. I am however distributing your comments to the City Council by way of this response. If you still wish for the
comments to be read at the May 26th meeting just let me know and I’m happy to do so. Thank you again.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Not Serf <
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 11:43 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: 4th of July Fireworks Display
Hello Randi and the City Council,
Please feel free to read this at the next city council meeting, or personally.
This is my first time writing since I usually feel like our city council does a very good job representing our people, but
the decision to forego the advise of their staff and vote to have the 4th of July fireworks display is incredibly short
sighted, so I had to write in.
Having a 4th of July fireworks celebration is not what our city or country needs. To many, it's not even something we
want at the moment.
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Tuesday, May 26, 2020 3:22 PM
To:Tanis June Earle
Cc:Aaron Adams; Greg Butler; Peter Thorson; Patrick Thomas
Subject:RE: PUBLIC COMMENTS 05/26/2020 (please reply that this was received for tonight's
City Council meeting)
Good afternoon – by way of this response I am providing a copy of your email below to the full City Council. A
copy has also been provided to Public Works Director Pat Thomas for further evaluation and/or response.
Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Tanis June Earle <
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 3:20 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Cc: Tanis Earle <
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENTS 05/26/2020 (please reply that this was received for tonight's City Council meeting)
RE: PW-17-17 Ynez Road Improvements (Widening of Ynez Corridor through Los Ranchitos Neighborhood)
Tanis Earle
Reside in Los Ranchitos Neighborhood
Temecula, CA 92592
Good evening Mayor, members of Council and staff,
Writing to opposition to PW-17-17 and asking you to reevaluate the plan to Widen Ynez to 4 lanes and take into
consideration the unquestionable resulting destruction of one of Temecula's most unique and beautiful
neighborhoods. I understand that the project is not yet fully funded and then AFTER funding is approved, there is to be
an environmental study. My question is how can you possibly proceed with funding if you don't even know what the
environmental impact will be. The budget is certainly likely to be much larger than anticipated after the study is
2
complete as you will need to factor in the cost to eliminate or greatly reduce the negative ramifications on the impacted
communities. The impact study is also likely to show that the project is not viable. Funding prior to impact study is like
putting the cart before the horse. It seems more reasonable to start with the study and then you will have a better
budget estimate, if at all.
If you were to allow/encourage the involvement Los Ranchitos, Santiago Estates, Santiago Ranches and other
surrounding communities in the project NOW, you will save time, money and headache. If community members felt like
they had a voice in the planning, design or perhaps complete cancellation of the project (depending on outcome of
study and necessary mitigation), this would save the City of Temecula negative repercussions and a potential law
suit. Seems to me that this would logically be a step that comes prior to funding approval. At a time like this, let's look
for ways to prevent division between you and your constituents.
Thanks in advance for listening and stay safe,
Tanis
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:06 PM
To:Louis Todd
Cc:Aaron Adams; Greg Butler; Peter Thorson; Patrick Thomas
Subject:RE: letter to read
Good afternoon – by way of this response I am providing a copy of your email below to the full City Council. A
copy has also been provided to Public Works Director Pat Thomas for further evaluation and/or response.
Thank you.
Mayor Stew and council members,
I would request my letter be read and made part of the record.
Subjects: Speed limit and Cut-thru traffic.
Speed Limits:
“The speed limit on most residential streets is 25 MPH (unless rural or otherwise posted). This lower speed
gives motorists more time to react to the unexpected and to stop in an emergency. By the time the driver
sees a hazard and applies the brakes to slow the vehicle, 2.5 seconds can elapse. In this brief period of
time, a vehicle traveling 35 MPH travels nearly 40 feet further than one traveling 25 MPH. When you travel
on residential streets, make a conscious effort to drive 25 MPH or less and check your speedometer
frequently”. This statement was taken word for word from the Temecula website Public safety Department.
Did you know:
A driver that is actually traveling at the current posted speed limit of 45mph or 66 feet per second will take
97 feet to stop, based on a standard Stopping (Braking) Distance Calculator. If you simply look our
driveways in the Los Ranchitos Home Owners Association on Ynez and De Portola roads, and just look at
the actual spacing this would only give a traveling motorist 1 or 2 seconds to respond. I think we would all
agree this a safety issue and it should be addressed before a fatality occurs. If you choose to ignore our
several horse crossings, it sadly will just be a matter of time before the rider, the horse or both are injured
or killed.
Last year you voted on the Vail Ranch Parkway to have its maximum speed dropped from 45 to 40 mph
between Nighthawk Pass and Redhawk Parkway, this is a 4-lane divided road with no residential driveways.
You made the correct decision then and now we ask that you again make the same decision to protect the
safety of your citizens the home owners of Los Ranchitos.
Cut-thru Traffic:
Your web site also states:
“minimizes your travel on residential streets” “Remember that you would not want your neighbors to speed
in front of your house. Adjust your driving patterns on local streets”.
You can fix this problem quickly with minimal cost.
We understand that traffic has to flow, but cut-thru traffic is to be avoided, the addition of traffic signals on
Temecula Parkway has resulted in drivers and their smart phone aps directing traffic to cut thru our
2
neighborhood. This is exactly the opposite of what the Cities traffic plan states is the goal. We ask that you
take the time and effort to help fix the problem created by the city in its effort to move traffic efficiently on
Temecula Parkway. Please fix the signal timing to help traffic patterns flow as your experts told you it would.
Regards,
Louis and Denise
Todd
Temecula Ca 92592
Please help our neighborhood
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Louis Todd <
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 3:59 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: letter to read
Importance: High
City of Temecula,
Please enter that attached letter into the record for the virtual meeting today May26 th 2020.
Will a copy be given to each council member?
Regards,
Louis Todd
3
The Southwest’s premier full service provider of precision measuring devices.
NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission is for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is
privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of any information contained
herein is prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify
the sender of the error by replying via email or calling Quality Control Solutions Inc (QCSI) 951-676-1616, so that our address record can be corrected.
Any information included in this email is provided on an “as is” and “whereas” basis, and QCSI makes no representations or warranties of any kind with
respect to the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this email.
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:27 PM
To:Natalie Morgan
Subject:RE: 🚦 Status Updated -Temecula-#305446 Planning [05568]-🏛
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Natalie Morgan <
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:16 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Fw: 🚦 Status Updated -Temecula-#305446 Planning [05568]-🏛
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Natalie Morgan <
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020, 03:32:41 PM PDT
Subject: Re: 🚦 Status Updated -Temecula-#305446 Planning [05568]-🏛
Randi,
My name Natalie Morgan I reside in Temecula. I'm on the Pastoral Team at The Rock Church San Diego (San
Marcos Campus- http://www.sdrock.com). Saturday, June 20th from 9-10 a.m. we will be prayer seeking God's blessings
on our Country and the World. The name of the event is ("We Pray San Diego" Pastor Miles McPherson Sr. Pastor). We
would greatly appreciate if our community would participate in this corporate prayer event. We have 10 other cities in San
Diego County that are participating, we have full confirmation from the Mayors of these cities.
Sincerely,
Pastor Natalie Morgan
The Rock Church (San Diego/San Marcos)
Rock Church - San Diego, CA
2
Rock Church - San Diego, CA
The Rock Church led by Pastor Miles McPherson is committed to
sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ with San Diego ...
On Tuesday, May 26, 2020, 02:48:22 PM PDT, Temecula <reply@mycivicapps.com > wrote:
--- To post a comment reply above this line ---
Temecula
Status Changed - #305446
Work Order #305446 status has changed from received to resolved.
Staff Note:
The City Council meeting is scheduled today May 26, 2020 at 7:00 p.m.
This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California
Executive Order N 29 20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID 19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may
be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N
29 20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this Council meeting, please submit your
comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to the City
Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the time
the Mayor calls the item for Public Comments. Email comments on agenda items must be submitted prior to the time the
Mayor closes public comments on the agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would
otherwise govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments on agenda items for this Council
meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be
accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed
three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council
meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Council meeting.
Status
resolved
Work Order
#305446
Issue Type
Planning
Notes
Is the meeting still on for today @7:00 PM?
Reporter Name
Natalie Morgan
3
Email
Phone
Report Submitted
MAY 26, 2020 - 2:30 PM
Please do not change subject line when responding.
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:47 PM
To:Brandon Jantz
Subject:RE: Temecula
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Naggar <mike@mikenaggar.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:16 AM
To: Brandon Jantz < ; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl
<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Re: Temecula
The cities reopening plan we adopted yesterday day. It will be[posted this morning. Please read it and provide
comment. We are going to revisit the plan in 2 weeks and will want your comment. We can than discuss if we can help.
> On May 13, 2020, at 6:15 AM, Brandon Jantz < wrote:
>
> Thank you for trying to get our city open. I’ve lived here practically my whole life and really love Temecula. I own the
local minor league soccer team here called Temecula FC. Unfortunately even if our local city council allows us to reopen
we can’t as we our party of a National operates league. Any suggestions to how we can help use our fan base to support
local family run businesses during this time. Regards
>
> Brandon Jantz
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:47 PM
To:Bruce and Marjorie Drayton
Subject:RE: Time to Open TEMECULA
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce and Marjorie Drayton <
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 6:30 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Time to Open TEMECULA
Our city is ready.....Enough of this Lockdown!! Enough!!!!
Sent from my iPhone
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:46 PM
To:Kimberly S
Subject:RE: Opening of the city
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Kimberly S <
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 6:33 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Opening of the city
To Whom It May Concern,
We keep hearing of the "gradual" re-opening of our city, county, state,
but to totally rescind BOTH social distancing and the wearing of face
masks at the same time seems anything BUT gradual! I would rather
have more stores, shops open but still require that masks be worn for a
bit longer as we monitor how things go having more businesses open. At
this point, the masks are not going to create a financial hardship on
someone, while still having stores closed does. Maybe have restaurants
open at 25% of capacity, or require that the tables must be 6 ft apart (or
seat people at every other table to create distance. I feel that someone
coughing or sneezing who is wearing a mask is less of a risk than
someone doing so 6 ft away.
Thank you for your time,
Kimberly Savage
2
Temecula, CA
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:46 PM
To:Kim Daly
Subject:RE: Reopening Temecula
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Kim Daly <
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 7:29 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Reopening Temecula
To whom it may concern:
I am a salon owner in Temecula. I have been in the same location for 30 years. I have been the owner for 15 years. The
original owner still works with me. There are four of us that have been together for the entire 30 years. I tell you all of
this because we aren't just a small business, we are family. This covid19 has ripped this family apart.
For years us stylists now only work together but truly look forward to seeing our clients who have become family as well.
It isn't just about doing hair. It is about relationships. Relationships that we have had with all the clients for years. Years
of laughing with them, crying with them, or just being there for them when there is so much sorrow in their lives that
there aren't any words.
Salons are essential. Not only to make people feel good on the outside but most importantly for people to know that
they are loved and that they truly matter. During these times we need that more than ever.
Thank you,
Kim Daly
Stylist/ Owner
Dimensions Salon
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:46 PM
To:Brenda
Subject:RE: Temecula Reopening Plan
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: Brenda <
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 7:57 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula Reopening Plan
Hello - I didn’t see where Day Care Centers are specifically addressed in the plan.
Are they included under one of the categories listed?
Thank you for a response.
Brenda Hamilton
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:46 PM
To:Lisa Maloney
Subject:RE: Reopening of Temecula
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Maloney <
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 8:31 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Reopening of Temecula
Dear Randi Johl,
I am grateful and encouraged by the progressive plan that the city of Temecula has for reopening the city. Under the
circumstances I feel Temecula is ready to cautiously reopen since there are very few cases and fortunately no deaths.
I am a citizen who is willing to wear a mask in public, wash my hands thoroughly and social distance in public. It is critical
that we allow business to be conducted and to our citizens to get back to work.
Sincerely
Lisa Maloney
Sent from my iPhone
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:45 PM
To:Sandra Vaniman
Subject:RE: Fast Track to reopening
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Sandra Vaniman <
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 6:20 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Fast Track to reopening
It is time for Temecula to get back to work and allow its residents to move about freely while
supporting local businesses. I am fully in favor of a fast track approach to opening our city.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sandra Vaniman
Temecula Resident
1
Erika Ramirez
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:45 PM
To:Kathy Bowman
Subject:RE: Yes please!
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Kathy Bowman <
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 6:25 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Yes please!
Thanks for your efforts to make Temecula a sub-region. We completely
support your efforts to open up everything. Keep up the good work.
Kathy Bowman
1
Erika Ramirez
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:45 PM
To:victoria manning
Subject:RE: Re-opening plan
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: victoria manning <
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 6:28 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Re-opening plan
Hello,
I would like to receive a copy of the safety plan for Temecula.
Tori Manning
Sent from my iPhone
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:45 PM
To:Debbie Noonan
Subject:RE: Regional Variance Letter
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Debbie Noonan <
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 7:56 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Regional Variance Letter
Great idea! Let's get Temecula open!
Deborah Noonan
Temecula resident
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:45 PM
To:Jill Erickson
Subject:RE: Reopening Temecula
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jill Erickson <
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 9:43 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Reopening Temecula
Good Morning
Temecula has been one of the fortunate areas in Southern California during the corona virus pandemic. People have
pulled together and complied, for the most part, with state and county guidelines. Most residents still wear masks
when appropriate, keep their distance, and are still staying home. As we open our amazing city, I have a few concerns:
1) That people will stop using safe practices while in stores and other establishments unless they are strongly
encouraged to do so
2) That if we open up all the wineries and bars, people will come from other areas with more known infection. We all
know that drinking and partying causes humans to let down their guard and there will be no disease consciousness in
those situations. Temecula might not be so fortunate anymore.
3) I read that Temecula plans to hold the annual 4th of July fireworks in the Sports Park this year.
How do you plan to keep everyone safe and healthy in these scenarios?
Thank you for your consideration.
Jill Erickson, CSP
Certified in Spiritual Psychology
Certified Grief Recovery Specialist®
"There are two ways of spreading Light: to be the candle or the mirror that reflects it." Edith Wharton
1
Erika Ramirez
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:44 PM
To:
Subject:RE: Temecula Reopening
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 9:44 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula Reopening
Hello,
As a 20 year resident, I am pleased to see how proactive the City of Temecula is regarding reopening our economy. I
fully support the movement to do so as soon as possible!
Thank you and keep up the good work.
Eileen Rosenow
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:44 PM
To:Lori Bermudez
Subject:RE: Reopening
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Lori Bermudez <
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 10:06 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Reopening
I do not understand why it is not mandatory for all in public areas to wear a mask and keep the social distancing in place.
They are the only things that will help prevent the spread of the virus. What happens when the virus resurges because of
resinding that simple order?
1
Erika Ramirez
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:44 PM
To:Rachel Walden
Subject:RE: Reopening Temecula
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rachel Walden <
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 11:03 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Reopening Temecula
To Whom It May Concern:
I am a Temecula resident and mother of 2 children. My children have suffered greatly from this lockdown. My 4 year
old daughter has cried every single day about not being able to go to preschool to learn and see her friends. This has
impacted her emotionally and developmentally. It’s so important for young children to be in an environment where
they can learn and socialize. She is extremely sad that she won’t be able to have a fun graduation at Bear Cub University
(wonderful program!) like her big brother did. My son has also suffered. The distance learning simply isn’t the same as
being in school for 6 hours of learning, playing outside, socializing, etc. We gave had zero Covid deaths in Temecula.
The fact that we have had to pay a price because larger, dirtier cities have been much more affected is simply unfair.
We are not children, we know how to protect ourselves and others. We do not need the government to babysit us.
What Gavin Newsom has done to our state is unforgivable. He has bankrupted us and has tried to play God in telling us
where we are allowed to go and how to live. He has NO authority in doing so. He forgot that he works for us, we the
people. I implore you to keep pushing to open our city, not just for small businesses and workers, but for the children.
They need to get back to normal so they can have a fun childhood filled with learning and growing. Thank you.
Rachel Pena
Sent from my iPhone
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:44 PM
To:Ira Robinson
Subject:RE: Modified Public Health Measures
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Ira Robinson <
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 4:33 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Modified Public Health Measures
Randi,
Regarding the City’s May 13, 2020 letter to Chairman Perez: Hard work. Nice job.
Much better on social distancing than the BOS.
Thanks.
Ira
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:44 PM
To:Ed Dool
Subject:RE: COMMUNITY RECOVERY 5/13/2020 LETTER COMMENTS
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Ed Dool <
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 7:16 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Mike Naggar
<mnaggar@citycouncil.org>
Subject: COMMUNITY RECOVERY 5/13/2020 LETTER COMMENTS
Thank You, the city's recovery consideration letter is right on and as stated Old Town is a Ghost Town with
business shutting their doors with others in the city. I and others would like the city to look at the City of Riversides
approved plan to disrupt a grant of $1.8 Million to 250 small business 25 or less employees, , with are reserve
emergency funds we could fund say 100 small business 25 or less a $10,000 GRANT NOW ,as a recovery for small
business to open up, that's $ 1.Million ,that is nothing for are city to step up with , they are a part of that $1.2 B sales,
Ed Dool
--
Edward Dool WOULD
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:44 PM
To:Dickie Bivin
Subject:RE: Reopen the city
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dickie Bivin <
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 8:18 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Reopen the city
Dear councilmembers,
After two months of being shut down it is paramount that we allowed to re-open in Temecula. It is obvious by the
numbers of people in Walmart, Home Depot, and various grocery stores that people can be around each other and the
virus can be contained. Restaurants, particularly independent restaurants must open with minimal restrictions. Patrons
must be allowed to sit at the bar in a safe manner. I strongly urge you to protect your mini independent restaurant
owners by allowing them to do business immediately. That includes full-service indoor seating and bar seating. The
danger of the virus being spread in a restaurant is no more than going to a grocery store. The only events that need to
be restricted or events where large crowds gather such as parades, sporting events, large public celebrations. The
citizens of Temecula, particularly the small business owners, have suffered a massive A massive financial tragedy that
even opening up now, they may not be able to recover. Please help as a business people maintain their businesses, their
home and the employment of their thousands of workers. Thank you for the hard work you’re doing now let’s finish it!
Sincerely
Richard Bivin
Sent from my iPhone
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:43 PM
To:Jane Lauhon
Subject:RE: Please open up Temecula
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jane Lauhon <
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 9:41 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Please open up Temecula
Dear Temecula City Council Members,
Thank you for what you are trying to do to reopen our city and on the road to being viable once again. Please do
what you have to do to make this happen. I'm not a small business owner, but, I can only imagine how
devastating this virus development has been for them. I wonder how many will never be able to open up for
business once again, which is a very sad situation.
Every state, county and city are different, and, should be treated as such. A blanket solution to this problem is
not the answer, and, only happens in a dictatorship such as Governor Newsom has created. The government
overreach has got to be stopped; please stop it here!
It is my understanding that a second wave of this virus is expected during our regular flu season. Does this
mean an entire winter of hiding behind our doors and masks? Our economy wouldn't survive that happening
again! People need to get back to work and children back in school. I doubt that this virus is going away, so, we
need to get back to living our lives and being able to enjoy the freedoms we have loved for so many years. Life
offers no guarantees, and, I refuse to live my life in fear that something may or may not happen.
Please fight the good fight to stop this encroachment on our freedoms! Remember that a small army of Patriots
won a hard fought war with for freedom back in 1775-1783. If they could do it, so can we!
Sincerely,
Jane Lauhon
2
Temecula, CA 92592-3665
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:43 PM
To:TONI REYES
Subject:RE: Comment regarding reopen plan
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: TONI REYES <
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 10:20 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Comment regarding reopen plan
Hello my name is Toni Reyes, I have read over the plan to reopen and I just have a question My wedding was supposed
to be March 21st at avensole winery and due to COVID it had to be postponed to July 3rd. Now my guest count is 143
guests and I see that it is only in phase 4 that events with larger than 50 people will be allowed In your honest opinion
do you think that phase 4 is realistic by July 3rd?
Me and my fiancé are both nurses so we’ve seen first hand what COVID is doing but thankfully it appears that our
county has been pretty lucky in the amount of our cases so I’m optimistic It has been a very stressful time as I’m sure it
has been for everyone and would just like to see what your opinion might be Thank you for your time!
Best Wishes,
Toni Reyes
Sent from my iPhone
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Friday, May 15, 2020 3:43 PM
To:Doug Ferrin
Subject:RE: Temecula Reopening Plan
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Doug Ferrin <
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 1:31 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Cc: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Mike
Naggar <mnaggar@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank
<Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula Reopening Plan
Dear Sir—
I briefly read this plan and while there may be good information and guidance for various businesses in Temecula, I find
it disgusting that you took the time to include before and after pictures of businesses here in Temecula. If you’re going
to do that, may I suggest also including before and after pictures of the 87,000+ Americans that have died as a result of
this pandemic? This document makes it look like the only reason these businesses are closed is because of some silly
pandemic. It is not. These businesses are closed due to the incompetence of the federal government, and specifically
President Trump and his failure to address the pandemic in January, February and through mid-March. That’s why these
businesses are closed. It didn’t have to be this way. If the President hadn’t referred to this pandemic as a “Democrat
hoax” and claimed that we’d go from 15 cases to zero cases in a few days we wouldn’t be in this predicament.
May I suggest including a warning that our federal government has completely refused to solve the testing, tracing, and
isolation issues in this country prior to reopening the economy? Without that warning, Americans are facing the real
threat of death by following these guidelines. It’s sad to think that Americans will die because they wanted to go to their
favorite restaurant, the gym, the mall, a winery, etc. and they got infected by an asymptomatic carrier of this deadly
virus.
Shame on the City of Temecula for publishing this one-sided document that does nothing to address health issues and
encourage people to stay at home. It’s all about the $ with this greedy city government, and that starts with the mayor.
Your greed is going to kill people – grandmothers, grandfathers, aunts, uncles, parents, you name it.
2
Just so you know, my wife and I are NOT prepared to visit any of these businesses until there’s adequate testing or a
vaccine. You can publish any documents you want but it doesn’t mean customers will show up.
I’m sure you won’t even read this or reply, but I did want you to know my feelings about this completely inadequate
plan and your deadly approach to reopening the economy here in Temecula.
Doug Ferrin
Temecula, CA 92592
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Monday, May 18, 2020 8:59 AM
To:John Gutierrez
Subject:RE: Reopening Temecula
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Gutierrez <
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 7:25 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Reopening Temecula
Today May 16th 2020 I went to Home Depot and was amazed to see that Home Depot had lifted their mask policy.
Employees and customers were walking around less than six feet at times without mask. I think this is wrong to allow
some businesses to operate almost as normal and others are having to continue to go without. So many of our retail
stores could operate the same as Home Depot, Lowes, Target or any of the other stores that have been able to stay
open.
It seems as if we have lost all common sense. Why is Koles, Circuit City different. They are large stores that could space
people out just like the others. I am closer to the clerk in the grocery store than I would be in most restaurants. I lost m y
wife in March and I can not purchase a plot to bury her, but I can go buy paint to paint the inside of my house please
explain to me the common sense of our government.
John Gutierrez
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Monday, May 18, 2020 8:58 AM
To:Chuck Colburn
Subject:RE: Opening Temecula.
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Colburn <
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 10:25 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Opening Temecula.
The more I read and see there is no reason for our great city to remain in lock down mode. My wife and I are in the
elderly group. Our health is good and we are terribly concerned for the businesses that are hurting so deeply. I may be
crazy but my vote would be to OPEN UP COMPLETELY.
Thank you for listening.
Charles Colburn
Temecula.
Sent from my iPhone
1
From:Aaron Adams
Sent:Wednesday, May 20, 2020 12:41 PM
To:Randi Johl; Greg Butler; Kevin Hawkins; Peter Thorson
Subject:FW: regarding FULLY opening Temecula Public parks and other facilities
Aaron Adams
City Manager
City of Temecula
(951) 694-6419
aaron.adams@TemeculaCA.gov
TemeculaCA.gov
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Rob Crisell <
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 12:36 PM
To: Mike Naggar <mnaggar@citycouncil.org>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart
<James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>
Subject: regarding FULLY opening Temecula Public parks and other facilities
Hi gentlemen.
I hope you’re well. Do you know when the City of Temecula will be allowed to stop pretending that Covid can
be spread by basketball parks, picnic tables, and play equipment? In other words, when will our citizens have
full access to these wonderful parks, pools, libraries, and other public facilities that we pay for?
Here is the latest good news from CDC, retracting their “guidance” on
surfaces: https://kprcradio.iheart.com/featured/the-pursuit-of-happiness/content/2020-05-20-never-mind-cdc-
now-says-coronavirus-doesnt-spread-much-on-surfaces/?fbclid=IwAR1cp-
O3qDwqLRiPDRgmXcxHzWro4yde1u9whF03ieYuJ7PqSJe2-wOjZbU
I hope the City continues to lead the county and state toward a faster yet safe reopening.
Sincerely
Rob Crisell
Temecula Ca
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 29, 2020, at 4:47 PM, Mike Naggar <mnaggar@citycouncil.org> wrote:
2
👍
On Apr 29, 2020, at 4:20 PM, Rob Crisell < wrote:
Thank you so much for the decision to reopen parks and the parking lots. Please
fight against the ongoing overreach by Sacramento and Riverside!
Sincerely
Rob Crisell
https://kesq.com/news/coronavirus/2020/04/29/riverside-county-extends-face-
covering-social-distancing-orders-to-june/
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 27, 2020, at 10:01 AM, Mike Naggar
<mnaggar@citycouncil.org> wrote:
Thank you Rob,
We will be discussing this issue at Tomorrow nights meeting.
Please participate. I agree 100%
On Apr 27, 2020, at 9:58 AM, Rob Crisell
< wrote:
Dear Maryann, Stew, and Mike:
Please see below my initial letter to Aaron Adams
and his thoughtful reply, as well as my reply to
him.
I hope the City Council votes to lessen restrictions
in Temecula, including opening all the city parks.
Now more than ever, we need common sense
leadership to combat the fear and panic that has
gripped our city. I know the council can meet this
challenge, but it must step up and ease the
Draconian restrictions that are within its
purview. If you have any questions or concerns,
feel free to contact me anytime.
I hope all is well with your families.
Sincerely,
3
ROB CRISELL
My FB Page: Rob Crisell actor
My website: www.robcrisell.com
Begin forwarded message:
From: Rob Crisell
<
Subject: Re: Note from Rob
Crisell regarding Temecula
Parks.
Date: April 27, 2020 at 9:49:32
AM PDT
To: Aaron Adams
<aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov
>
Aaron:
Thanks for you quick reply. I hope
you’re well.
The rules are not going to be obeyed
by a certain percentage of people;
that is true in any legal scheme.
However, right now, people are
simply “breaking” those rules in city
streets and private open space area
(like Meadowview) rather than in the
relative uncrowded parks. Families
with small children are trapped in
houses or apartments—or forced to
play near crowded streets and
sidewalks—rather than in the relative
safety of the parks.
It’s time to trust the people to make
decisions that are best for themselves
and their families. The city of
Temecula’s current policy (which is
at variance with the County’s
recommendation) is punishing
everyone for the acts of a relative
few.
I hope that you and the City Council
decide to open the all parking lots
4
and parks tomorrow night. It is the
right thing to do.
Sincerely,
ROB CRISELL
My FB Page: Rob Crisell actor
My website: www.robcrisell.com
On Apr 27, 2020, at
9:26 AM, Aaron
Adams
<aaron.adams@temec
ulaca.gov> wrote:
Good morning Rob,
hope your healthy and
safe. Just to clarify, we
never closed our City
parks. By County
Health Order we closed
park amenities (ie Skate
park, Pump Track,
playgrounds, RR,
Fields). We left the
open space component
of all of our parks open
for our community to
enjoy given the need to
get out. Later, County
Health orders came
down requiring closure
of parking lots to parks
(of which we complied).
This meant to limit the
ease of access and
mitigate over
crowing/congregation
challenges. It was only
mid-week last week
that the County revised
this order along with
some relaxed
restrictions to
5
recreational elements
like golf, tennis and
pickleball. As such, we
re-opened parking lots,
RR and the courts to
our public at both
Margarita Community
Park and Pala Park of
which have both tennis
and pickleball courts
owned and operated by
City.
We will be discussing
with the City Council
tomorrow night the
concept of re-opening
parking lots in balance
of parks, yet the
physical and social
distancing, mask
requirements (based on
Park Ranger
observations) was not
necessarily being
adhered to by majority
of patrons. This remains
a health and safety
requirement and
concern. Stay tuned as
we continue to manage
this crisis and
operations accordingly.
As you can hopefully
appreciate, the County
Health Officer and
Governor are ultimately
the bodies that will
continue to amend and
lift restrictions and
cities will be allowed to
consider following suit.
Regards,
Aaron Adams
City Manager
City of Temecula
(951) 694-6419
aaron.adams@TemeculaC
A.gov
TemeculaCA.gov
Please note that email
correspondence with the
6
City of Temecula, along
with attachments, may be
subject to the California
Public Records Act, and
therefore may be subject
to disclosure unless
otherwise exempt.
From: Rob Crisell
<
>
Sent: Sunday, April 26,
2020 6:33 PM
To: Aaron Adams
<aaron.adams@temecu
laca.gov>
Subject: Note from Rob
Crisell regarding
Temecula Parks.
Hi, Aaron:
I hope all is well. Can
you tell me why the
city parks in
Temecula are closed?
This decision seems
to fly in the face of
Riverside County’s
guidance and (at the
very least) is
unjustified right now.
I live in wine country,
and people are having
to walk on dangerous
winding streets or the
go en masse
to Meadowview open
spaces.
Please open the parks!
See Riverside’s latest
announcement on
this. They imply that
parks have never been
closed completely in
Riverside…
https://nbcpalmspring
s.com/2020/04/20/riv
erside-county-allows-
outdoor-activities-to-
reopen-with-
7
restrictions-including-
golf-courses/
All my best to you
and your family.
Sincerely,
ROB CRISELL
My FB Page: Rob
Crisell actor
My
website: www.robcris
ell.com
1
From:Jennifer Palmer <
Sent:Wednesday, May 20, 2020 8:24 PM
To:Randi Johl
Subject:TVHS Tennis Courts
Hello...tennis has been approved for quite some time and even in your plans it states that all city park/facilities are open
now. TVHS tennis courts are run by the city and have been available for public use...why are they not opened yet? The
available tennis courts is very minimal and only opening Pala Park and Margarita Park is not sufficient.
Sent from my iPad
1
From:Kathleen Bowen <
Sent:Thursday, May 21, 2020 12:00 PM
To:Randi Johl
Subject:Re: Temecula reopening plan- testing requirement needed to maintain State compliance
To Whom it may concern:
In order to meet the State requirement of <8% Tests being positive, it is critical that asymptomatic people get
tested.
This will only happen if it is required.
I suggest as a requirement for stores, restaurants ect to reopen they require their employees to get tested.
They could give businesses 4-6 weeks to show compliance to not slow the opening process.
It could also be required that all businesses within the county test 20 % of their workers monthly.
This should be at the county level as it impacts a larger number of people.
If testing is not required people who are healthy will not get tested!
Thank you for your consideration
Kathleen Bowen
From: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 8:58 AM
To: Kathleen Bowen <
Subject: RE: Temecula reopening planct
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Kathleen Bowen <
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 10:03 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula reopening plan
2
To Whom it may concern:
As a 15 year resident of Temecula, I would like to thank all of you that are working so diligently to reopen the
area.
We must get people back to work, day care options open and all small business including restaurant and
wineries opened as soon as possible.
We must revive the economy before it is to late! At risk and persons with concerns will still have the ability to
stay home until they feel safe.
Thank you for the hard work and good decision making.
Sincerely
Kathleen Bowen
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Tuesday, May 26, 2020 11:06 AM
To:
Subject:RE: Temecula's Re-opening Plan
Received and thank you, your comments will be read into the record at tonight’s meeting.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 10:40 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula's Re-opening Plan
Good morning Randi,
My husband and I have been residents of Temecula for 19 years. We just wanted to voice our concern as to what we
witnessed in Old Town Temecula over this Memorial Day Weekend.
We went to Old Town on Saturday to pick up a few things from the local shops. We passed by at least three dining
establishments that were packed with people with no social distancing and very few people wearing facial coverings. I
realize that Riverside County no longer requires facial coverings, merely recommends them. We wear facial masks
whenever in public to protect ourselves and others. I believe in order for businesses to re-open they must have a plan
which includes social distancing. Please correct me if I am misinformed on this. I also believe that dining establishments
are allowed to re-open, but not bars.
We drove through Old Town on Memorial Day, thinking that surely the establishments we had noticed were packed might
be less so, perhaps maybe the City might have noticed the crowded conditions and had done something about it. Still
packed on Memorial Day as well. The establishments I'm talking about are Stone Church Brewery, Old Town Pub and
The Bank Plates & Pours. We will not be patronizing those businesses again.
I would like a response regarding the social distancing requirements in Temecula and my concerns.
Thank you for your time.
Ann and Dennis Johnson
Temecula, CA 92592
1
Subject:FW: Letter to the City Council
Attachments:City SC Temecula - Letter to City Council.pdf
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 5:58 PM
To: Michael Richards <
Subject: RE: Letter to the City Council
Received, thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Michael Richards <
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 5:41 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Letter to the City Council
Hi Randi,
I was informed by Adam Ruiz to forward you an email from our local soccer club addressed to the City Council for their
review regarding our support of their actions during the COVID-19 crisis. I have attached a PDF document of the
letter. Thank you in advance for your help. We appreciate everything you and the entire staff at the City do for our
community.
--
Michael Richards
Director of Operations
City SC Temecula
w: citysctemecula.com
t. (951) 696-CITY (2489) w. http://citysctemecula.com e. admin@citysctemecula.com
City SC Temecula is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
Temecula City Council
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Esteemed Temecula City Council Members,
Thank you for your leadership during this difficult time. Our city and our families have been inspired by
the Council s drive and determination to set Temecula on an excellent course to lead the return to
business for all of Riverside County.
City Soccer Club Temecula is a proud community-based youth soccer organization which has operated in
Temecula for the benefit of our children and their families for almost 20 years. We are a non-profit
organization that continues to provide excellent atmosphere and opportunities for our local athletes to
thrive and grow within the game of soccer. We have deep roots with thousands of local players proudly
calling our club home over the years here in Temecula.
Just as you have led our city within the region managing the pandemic response, we know you are
prepared to lead us out of this public health crisis. Our soccer club has worked aggressively to establish
new safety protocols and plans in order to return to practice and skill training by collaborating with
several other clubs throughout Southern California. We have demonstrated a high level of compliance
with all current public health orders. We are proud of our club for developing robust safety and physical
distancing protocols to demonstrate that we are indeed ready to get back to training on the field. Our
return-to-field plan incorporates Physical Distancing and Health & Safety Requirements as to be in
compliance with suggested guidelines. Our 4-Phased Plan starts with maximum social distancing while
playing outside, limited number of players, shorter practice sessions, and many health and safety
protocols. Our coaches have been trained on this plan and we are actively communicating it to our
athletes and their families.
With the seemingly daily updates of many industries and local companies being allowed to open for
business we feel that youth sports has been overlooked to some extent. While we are happy that
restaurants and retail businesses have been allowed to reopen, we are hoping that the City Council will
consider a return-to field opportunity for youth sports organizations that have engaged in a thorough
Health & Safety plan and can demonstrate its effectiveness.
t. (951) 696-CITY (2489) w. http://citysctemecula.com e. admin@citysctemecula.com
City SC Temecula is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization
Youth sports is an integral part of the lives of many of the children in our community. It is vital to their
growth and development to learn all of the valuable teachings that team sports has to offer as life
lessons. A safe, successful and lasting return to the field for our young athletes will demand a
coordinated effort between all of us The City of Temecula leadership team, City Soccer Club Temecula,
our families and our athletes. As you continue to press forward for the benefit of all of our families, we
are hopeful you will recognize the commitment to safety City Soccer Club Temecula has developed.
Thank you for your time and consideration of our return-to-field plan. We welcome your questions,
comments and insights into how we can continue to lead our local youth sports community back onto
the field.
Thank you,
Michael Richards
President City Soccer Club Temecula
1
From:Randi Johl
Sent:Wednesday, May 27, 2020 7:55 AM
To:Chastity Cervantez
Subject:RE: Temecula Reopening 5/26 meeting
Received and thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Chastity Cervantez <
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 8:41 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula Reopening 5/26 meeting
Hello,
My name is Chastity Cervantez and I would like to voice my opinion. I would like Temecula to reopen without
restrictions. Thank you.