HomeMy WebLinkAbout022703 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the
office of the City Clerk at (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
TO BE HELD AT
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 Business Park Drive
Teinecula, California
Thursday, February 27, 2003 at 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL: COMMISSIONERS: Katan, Ramos, Wedel, Connertou, Lanier
PRESENTATION:
Police Chief Domenoe - Introduction of new Temecula Police Sergeant and Lieutenant
Fire Station 84 Paramedic Squad - Update and demonstration of new rescue units
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items that are not
listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission
about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with
the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary before the
Commission gets to that item. ~aere is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote.
There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission request
specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of January 23~ 2003
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of January 23, 2003.
I
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. State Route 79 North (Winchester Road) - Construction Schedulin~
and Traffic Signal Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report.
3. Request for Multi-Way Stop Signs - Bntterfield Stage Road and Channel StreeffWelton Way
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council and the County
Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection
of Butterfield Stage Road and Welton Way/Channel Street.
4. Promenade Chardonna¥ Hills - Multi-Way Sto~ Signs
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission continue the discussion of the Promenade
Chardonnay Hills request for Multi-Way Stop Signs.
5. Temecula Citizen Corps Program
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission appoint one Public/Traffic Safety Commissioner
to assist each Temecula Citizen Corps area, and appoint the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Chairman to oversee all areas.
6. Traffic Engineer's Report
7. Police Chief's Report
8. Fire Chief's Report
9. Commission Reports
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday,
March 27, 2003 at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
Califomia.
2
ITEM NO. '1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR
MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
JANUARY 23, 2003
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting
at 6:00 p.m., on Thursday, January 23, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula
City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
FLAG SALUTE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Connerton.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Katan, Ramos, Wedel, Connerton,
and Chairman Lanier.
Absent: None.
Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes,
Senior Engineer Moghadam,
Principal Engineer Butler,
Principal Engineer Attar,
Associate Engineer Gonzalez,
Battalion Chief McBride,
Police Chief Domenoe,
Police Sergeant Lohman,
Deputy Fire Marshal Neumann,
Fire Safety Specialist Horton,
Fire Safety Specialist Branaugh,
Administrative Secretary Pyle,
Minute Clerk Hansen, and
Minute Clerk Ross.
*(It is noted that Commissioner Katan arrived at 6:03 p.m.)
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Introduction of new Fire Department Staff- Battalion Chief McBride
Battalion Chief McBride introduced the following new employees to the Commission:
Fire Safety Specialist Mike Horton, Fire Safety Specialist Shawn Branaugh, and Deputy
Fire Marshal Jason Neumann.
Chairman Lanier congratulated Battalion Chief McBride on his promotion and welcomed
all the new Fire Department employees to the City of Temecula.
Police Department Update - Police Chief Domenoe
Police Chief Domenoe provided the Commission with an update on the progress of the
Citizen Corps Program, as follows:
· That the Citizen Corps Program will consist of members of government, the
school district, the community, the Fire and Police Departments, the City, the
business community and community-at-large;
· That weekly meetings are being held with the Council in order to formalize a
training program;
· That on January 16, 2003, the first community informational meeting was held to
solicit citizens who wish to participate in this program; and that it was met with a
very positive response;
· That at the January 16 meeting, interest cards were distributed to attendees who
were also advised that program information was available as well as being made
available on the City's website. Approximately 25 interest cards have been
received to date and each individual is being contacted personally;
· That on January 30, 2003, a second public introduction meeting will be held in
the City Council Chambers at 7 p.m;
· That presently staff is developing a marketing plan and budget for the program.
Police Chief Domenoe conveyed to the Commission that he was very excited about the
program and assured to keep them the Commission updated on the Citizen Corps'
progress.
In response to Commissioner Wedel's request for an organizational chart of the Citizen
Corps Program, Chief Domenoe stated that he would make the chart available to the
Commission.
Commissioner Connerton congratulated Police Chief Domenoe and all the members of
the Police and Fire Departments for organizing such a great program. Chief Domenoe
advised that it was a team effort; and that he is very optimistic that this program will be a
model for this area and, perhaps, even the nation.
For Commissioner Katan, Chief Domenoe advised that an initial budget of $5,000 was
appropriated from the Police Department.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of October 24 and December 127 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of October 24, 2002.
1.2 Approve the Minutes of December 12, 2002.
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1
and 2. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Wedel and voice vote reflected
approval, with the exception of Commissioner Ramos who abstained from Consent
Calendar Item No. 1.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Request for Multi-Way Stop Si.qns - Promenade Chardonnay Hills
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission deny the request for Multi-Way
Stop Signs along Promenade Chardonnay Hills.
Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report of record, reviewed the
background of the request, and recommended that the Commission approve staff's
request to deny the request for multi-way stop signs along Promenade Chardonnay Hills.
In response to Chairman Lanier's query and in reference to the chart on page 2 of the
staff report, Senior Engineer Moghadam clarified that the data in the chart was compiled
prior to the purchase of the light emitting diode (LED) signs.
Replying to Commissioner Connerton's inquiries, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised,
as follows:
· That at present, there were currently no temporary stop signs in Chardonnay
Hills;
· That one sign was present in the west northerly direction for approximately
months;
· That one stop sign was present for a few weeks but removed due to a resident's
complaint; and the fact that a policy was not in place at the time, therefore, the
sign was unenforceable.
For Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised that there were no
realized benefits from the signs because they weren't up long enough to do a complete
before and after speed data study; however, in conversations with residents and in the
R:\trafficminutes\012303 3
perception of drivers, he advised that people were slowing down as a result of the LED
sign and that the signs elicited a positive response.
For clarification purposes, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised that the location of the
sign for the westerly or northerly direction was just east of Chemin Margaux and the sign
in the easterly direction was north of Parducci Lane; and that it was the sign north of
Parducci Lane that was removed.
In response to Commissioner Wedel's inquiry, Senior Engineer Moghadam stated that,
although the data was seven to eight months old, staff had recently completed daily
observational counts; and there were no significant changes in traffic because most of
the homes were still under construction and not currently occupied.
At this time, Chairman Lanier opened the public hearing.
The following citizens stated their support for the installation of stop signs in the
Chardonnay Hills area:
· Joseph LaMarca, 41138 Promenade Chardonnay
· Don Smith, 41209 Promenade Chardonnay
· Tracy Enalen, 41200 Promenade Chardonnay
· James Wrather, 41194 Promenade Chardonnay
· Vincent Cocca, 41132 Promenade Chardonnay
The above citizens were in favor of the installation of stop signs in the Chardonnay Hill
area for the following reasons:
· That cut-through traffic has increased and traffic conditions have become worse
with the increased growth;
· That the safety of the neighborhood children is of concern;
· That drivers speeding issues is 24 hours a day;
· That the LED signs were not working or not working long enough;
· That the traffic creates excessive noise impacts.
At this time, Chairman Lanier closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Wedel thanked the citizens for their comments and summarized the
issues as follows:
· That the neighborhood perception is one of excessive speeding which has been
validated by the recommendation of the Public/Safety Traffic Commission for
Stage #1 traffic calming; however, in this case, traffic calming efforts were not
successful;
· That a problem does exist - excessive speed; and that the issue is how to
address it appropriately;
· That, in addition, the issue of liability should be addressed if unwarranted stop
signs were installed;
· That the idea that stop signs are not effective in slowing traffic should be
challenged. Via overhead projection, Commissioner Wedel referred to a chart
distributed by the Public Works Commission from an issue of the Urban
Transportation Monitor called "The Effectiveness of Traffic Calming Measures to
Reduce Speeds." The effectiveness of stop signs fell in the middle of the chart;
· That warrants are guidelines--not laws;
· That the preface should be customer friendliness and creating a peaceful quiet
safe environment;
· That a staff report, which recommends no stop signs, cannot be supported
without providing an alternate solution.
Commissioner Connerton made the following points:
· That it has not been proven that stop signs slow traffic but that they function as
part of an overall program to control traffic;
· That because these are public streets, cut-through traffic is very difficult to
control;
· That traffic speeds could be studied by placing the radar trailer in the
neighborhood which measures and records speeds.
Because there is an obvious problem with traffic/speed in the neighborhood and the
Commission is charged with finding the most appropriate solution, Commissioner
Connerton recommended that the radar trailer be placed on the neighborhood streets for
a period of three to four days; that the trailer then be removed and that traffic speeds be
enforced by motor officers for several days; that the radar trailer be put back in the
neighborhood and repeat the cycle in order to make a good determination of the
traffic/speed issue.
Commissioner Ramos commended the residents and homeowners of Chardonnay Hills
for investing their time and efforts and agreed with Commissioner Wedel that a solution
needs to be found to alleviate the neighborhood traffic issues. Commissioner Ramos
stated that to continue to study the issues would just belabor the problem and
recommended action by installing two stop signs, especially one where the school bus
stops.
Commissioner Katan thanked the residents for their comments; advised that, obviously,
the data did not support what the residents were experiencing in their neighborhood; and
agreed with Commissioner Ramos regarding the placement of a stop sign perhaps at the
highest point of speed as a good test to determine if a stop sign would slow down the
traffic.
Commissioner Katan opined that if a stop sign placed at the greatest point of speed
were successful in slowing the traffic down, additional signs could then be considered
not by warrant standards but by actual standards.
Commissioner Katan suggested increased enforcement, speed bumps (referring to a
television program about speed bumps in the City of Seattle that were designed to be
open for the wheel base of emergency vehicles), or any alternative that would improve
the situation without relying solely on stop signs.
In response to Commissioner Katan's inquiry, Senior Engineer Moghadam advised that
there was one location where visibility was an issue; however, it only becomes an issue
if someone were using excessive speed - referring to the location as Chemin Cline (the
top of the hill).
Referring to the location of the tot lot/pool as justification for a stop sign, Senior Engineer
Moghadam clarified for Commissioner Wedel, that all conditions are considered not just
those that directly impact the warrant
FAILED MOTION: Commissioner Wedel made a motion to install two stop signs of the
four requested, one at the Chemin Cline intersection (where the bus stops) as an initial
deterrent to cut-through traffic and teave the other stop sign open for discussion. The
motion was seconded for discussion by Commissioner Ramos. Ultimately, this motion
failed for lack of a vote.
Chairman Lanier suggested that as part of the follow-up study, an up-to-date survey be
compiled to include the numbers and the 85th percentile.
Commissioner Connerton requested the completion of an additional up-to-date analysis;
advised that it was his experience that stop signs do not slow traffic but do cause a false
sense of safety; and relayed that, at this time, he would not be in favor of any stop signs
at this time;
Discussion ensued among the Commissioners with various solutions being suggested.
The consensus was to have staff prepare a solution(s) and bring the item back to the
Commission at the next meeting.
Director of Public Works Hughes made the following points:
· That it would be his preference not to install stop signs only to possibly have
them removed because of ineffectiveness;
· That if stop signs were to be installed for the purpose of slowing traffic, the
Commission should make that recommendation to the City Council;
· That regardless of the number of completed surveys that are done, the existing
speeds will not satisfy everyone;
· That a drastic change in speed will not occur by installing multiple stop signs;
The average drop in speed is 3 m.p.h;
· That if the Commission has a recommendation, it should go forward with it and
not experiment.
In response to Commissioner Connerton's inquiry, Director of Public Works Hughes
clarified that the use of the LED radar trailer and increased enforcement could be
implemented without City Council approval; however, in order for a stop sign to be
enforceable, it would require City Council approval.
SECOND MOTION: Commissioner Connerton made a motion to: (1) install the LED
speed limit signs in both directions at a location to be determined by the Public Works
Department for a period of 10 days, (2) enforce speed limits, and monitor and record
speeds at regular intervals to be determined by the Police Department to be the most
effective for a period of 10 days, and (3) return the LED radar trailer to measure the
effectiveness of enforcement. The motion was seconded for discussion by Chairman
Lanier. This motion ultimately failed (see page 8).
If the Commission's intention were to immediately affect driving habits, Sergeant Loman
advised that placing motor officers in the area writing tickets would be the most effective.
Commissioner Connerton added that it would be his desire to record the speeds
measured by the radar trailer in order to have additional data to compare with the speed
surveys.
Commissioner Wedel opined that these solutions had been tried over a year ago, and
that increased enforcement by the Police Department doesn't provide a permanent
solution; therefore, he cannot support such a motion.
Commissioner Connerton reiterated that it was also a proven fact that stop signs are not
an effective measure for slowing traffic.
Referring to the traffic engineers' survey, Commissioner Wedel advised that stop signs
were ranked as an effective tool for slowing traffic. Director of Public Works Hughes
encouraged the Commission to set an objective and to request staff to evaluate
solutions in an effort to meet that goal.
In agreement with Director of Public Works Hughes, Commissioner Wedel articulated
the facts, as follows:
· That according to California Law, there is a 25 m.p.h, speed limit in a residential
neighborhood;
· That the Police Department advises that a ticketable speed is approximately
30 m.p.h, in a residential neighborhood;
· That as an intermediate step, options be discussed between staff and the
neighborhood homeowners association; that agreeable actions be forwarded to
the Commission in four weeks for approval.
Director of Public Works Hughes advised that if the goal were 30 m.p.h., that staff would
discuss recommendations with the Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association to ensure
their acceptance and forward a recommendation to the next meeting of the Public/Safety
Traffic Commission to be held on February 27, 2003.
For Director of Public Works Hughes, Commissioner Wedel clarified that the goal would
be an 85th percentile of 30 m.p.h.
By way of a voice vote, the previously made motion failed, as follows: Commissioners
Katan, Ramos, Wedel were opposed and Commissioner Connerton and Chairman
Lanier were in support.
Commissioner Ramos opined that as a motorist he would cut-through Chardonnay Hills
knowing that the neighborhood has no stop signs; however, if he knew he would have to
make several stops, he would avoid the neighborhood.
FINAL MOTION: Commissioner Katan made a motion to direct staff to provide the
Public Safety/Traffic Commission with alternatives and options which would address the
goal of reducing the speeds in the Chardonnay Hills neighborhood to 30 m.p.h. (i.e., the
85th percentile of speed traveled at 30 m.p.h.), and that staff obtain input from the
Chardonnay Hills Homeowners Association regarding these alternatives and options
prior to the next Public/Safety Traffic Commission Meeting on February 27, 2003; and,
additionally, moved to increase enforcement in the Chardonnay Hills area. The motion
was seconded by Commissioner Wedel and voice vote reflected approval, with the
exception of Commissioner Ramos, who opposed.
3. Jefferson Avenue Median Desiqn - Winchester Road to Sanborn Avenue
Recommendation:
3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report and
provide recommendations as necessary.
Chairman Lanier advised that he would be abstaining from this item, and left the dais at
this time.
Director of Public Works Hughes presented a brief update on the status of the median
design and introduced Senior Engineer Butler and Senior Engineer Attar who presented
additional information via enlarged Exhibits, highlighting the following:
· That the project only entails improvements to the intersection of Winchester
Road and Jefferson Avenue;
· That the improvements primarily address the increased turning movements
anticipated with additional development in the City;
· That the improvements also address the widening of Winchester Road west of
Jefferson Avenue;
· That the point of discussion tonight, however, is the proposed access control and
conflicting left-turn movements along Jefferson Avenue between Winchester
Road and Sanborn Avenue;
· That Exhibit 1 represents all current peak hour traffic counts for the left-turn
movements in the vicinity of the area under study;
· That Exhibit 2 depicts the proposed median (from Winchester Road to Sanborn
Avenue) that would allow traffic to make a left or U-turn at Sanborn Avenue in a
left-turn pocket;
· That the proposed improvements include a widening on the southbound direction
of Jefferson Avenue between Winchester Road and Sanborn Avenue;
· That the high volume of accidents in this area is attributed to conflicting left turns
cutting across through traffic;
· That in staff's opinion, to cut the median shorter would only shift the accident
point.
For clarification purposes, Senior Engineer Butler stated that the funded and approved
portion of the project was for the Winchester Road Intersection Improvements, i.e., the
dual left-hand turn lanes.
Commissioner Ramos expressed his concern for the business owners on both sides of
the street that would be tremendously impacted by the proposed median.
Director of Public Works Hughes commented, as follows:
· That Jefferson Avenue was not the only street location that medians were being
considered;
· That the City's Capital Improvement Program has identified median installation
for the entire length of Jefferson Avenue from the City limits to the north all the
way to Rancho California to the south;
· That because of the multiple conflicting traffic movements, there exists a traffic
accident problem;
· That the General Plan identifies Jefferson Avenue as an arterial roadway with a
median;
· That a roadway with a median has a greater roadway vehicle capacity;
· That the issue is providing effective access to the adjacent properties vs.
reducing accidents and improving the capacity of the roadway;
· That as the City grows and roadway capacity and volume increases, in some
cases, traffic traveling in one direction can support those businesses that were
previously dependent on two-way traffic;
R:~trafficminutes\012303 9
· That it would be suggested that the Commission hear the concerns of the
business owners in the area and their recommendations.
· That at this time, this is only a study instrument and that no final determination
has been made;
· That from a transportation and safety standpoint, the median would be the
preferred alternative; however, staff does recognize the issue of access to
businesses.
In response to Commissioner Connerton's queries, Public Works Director Hughes
clarified, as follows:
· That the traffic volumes as stated in the staff report reflect current peak hour
volumes (a.m. and p.m.) and that they are not projecting future volumes;
· That upon completion, the new interchange improvements are going to change
traffic patterns throughout the area and may alleviate some concerns of the area
businesses;
· That the intersection improvements at Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road
will be needed with or without the proposed interchange;
· That the median would serve as a means of correcting an existing accident
issue;
· That there is no design manual warrant for medians;
· That there are different hierarchies of roadways that have theoretical capacities
and access restrictions and that as designated, Jefferson Avenue was intended
to serve a higher level of volume and capacity - one that would require a median.
For Commissioner Katan, Director of Public Works Hughes stated that solely the
accident rate would warrant the need for new alternatives and that staff would likely
recommend a median regardless of the street classification.
Regarding the accident history at Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road, Senior
Engineer Moghadam commented that because of the Commission's awareness of the
high number of accidents, it was requested that the issue be agendized; and in response
to Commissioner Katan's inquiry, it was indicated that there was no specific number of
accidents.
At this time, Chairman Connerton opened the hearing to the public.
The following individuals and business owners spoke in opposition to the proposed
median:
* Carliene Anderson, 27311 Jefferson Avenue, Winchester Plaza Project
* Billy Lim, 27300 Jefferson Avenue #A, Operator of Billy B's
* Fred Grimes, 27311 Jefferson Avenue #103
* David Thompson, 27315 Jefferson Avenue ¢~LI, Mailmart
* Jack Williams, 27311 Jefferson Road, Owner of Richie's Diner
* Darcey Rooney, 27311 Jefferson Avenue
* Mark Esbensen, 27311 Jefferson Avenue
The above-mentioned individuals and business owners were opposed to the proposed
median and provided the following comments:
· That limiting access to businesses on either side of Jefferson Avenue would be
devastating and could cause the loss of 40% to 60% of their business;
· That access and circulation is a critical element to a successful business;
· That the same sensitivity that was shown to businesses on the east side of the
City be afforded to those on Jefferson Avenue, i.e., circulation plans, stop lights,
and left turn pockets;
· That a stop light and protected left-hand turn be installed at Sanborn to allow a
break in traffic rather than a median limiting access to businesses.
· That a balance be found between traffic needs, safety, and the needs of the
surrounding businesses.
· That the Commission schedule a workshop with staff and the affected business
owners in order to consider all the issues.
· That the speed limit on Jefferson Avenue be lowered.
· That in the spirit of cooperation, the owners of Jefferson Creek Center offered to
redo the existing driveway approach so that it would create an easier
ingress/egress, noting that there currently is a steep incline in the driveway apron
causing traffic to almost stop before entering.
At this time, Commissioner Connerton closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Katan opined that an effective Commission is one that addresses issues
that are problems for its citizens, i.e., the intersection of Jefferson Avenue and
Winchester Road; and that the decision should be based on fact not emotion.
Commissioner Ramos agreed that there was a high incident of accidents because of the
speed of traffic coming in from the City of Murrieta; that the driveway was an issue and
should be redesigned to create an easier ingress and egress; and that it was his
recommendation to hold a workshop with staff, emergency services, and business
owners to develop alternative solutions and bring them to the Commission for further
review.
In response to Commissioner Connerton's inquiries, Director of Public Works Hughes
advised, as follows:
R:\trafficrmnutes\012303 1 1
· That no final determinations have been made other than the improvements to the
intersection.
· That the dispersal of information and workshops were planned as part of the
median projects throughout the City.
· That the observation of the high accident rate at Jefferson Avenue and
Winchester Road caused the Commission to request that this item be placed on
the agenda for the purpose of discussing the issue and proposing possible
solutions.
· That the input received from both the Commission and business and property
owners is valuable in the continuation of staff's work.
Responding to some of the comments presented, Director of Public Works relayed the
following:
· With regard to speed limits, the City has a limited ability to control speed limits or
lower them below the 85th percentile speed.
· With regard to the signal at Sanborn Avenue, any gaps in traffic that would be
created by a signal would be short lived due to the expected increase in traffic
volumes. In addition, the City has a priority list of approximately 40 signal
locations, with funding available for one or two per year.
· With the interchange project to the north and if the ramp serves access to
Jefferson Avenue, there will be a signal light to the north of this location.
In response to the Commission's inquiries, Director of Public Works Hughes advised as
follows:
· That the intersection improvements providing multiple left and right turn
movements are funded in the current budget.
· That the intersection project will be taken north to at least driveway #19 (Exhibit
3), with more flexibility from that point north.
· That the dual stacking lane will be 300 feet in length.
· That construction on the median project would be approximately 12 months away
with the construction of the intersection improvements occurring earlier.
MOTION: Commissioner Ramos made a motion that staff schedule a workshop to
discuss alternatives and options to the proposed median project and invite emergency
services, business owners, and members of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
Commissioner Wedel seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Chairman Lanier, who abstained.
Commissioner Katan opined the importance of giving property and business owners
adequate notification and requested that staff plan accordingly.
it is noted that the Public/Safety Traffic Commission received and filed this report with
comments.
4. Appointment of Chairman and Vice Chairman
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission entertain nominations from the
Commissioners to appoint a Chairman and a Vice Chairman to preside
until the end of the 2003 calendar year.
MOTION: Commissioner Katan made a motion to elect Commissioner Connerton as
Chairman of the Public Safety/Traffic Commission until the end of the 2003 calendar
year. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ramos and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton made a motion to elect Commissioner Katan as
Vice Chairman of the Public Safety/Traffic Commission until the end of the 2003
calendar year. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Ramos and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
There were no further comments made.
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
There were no further comments made.
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
There were no further comments made.
COMMISSION REPORTS
Commissioner Connerton advised that he had received notice of a meeting to discuss
the recommendations for amendments to the General Plan which were in the final
stages and would be presented to the City Council in the near future.
Commissioner Connerton encouraged everyone to attend the meeting for the Citizen
Corps Program to be held next Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 7 p.m.
Chairman Lanier suggested that recognition in the form of an award be given to officers
for their dedication and hard work during the implementation of "DUI Checkpoints," and
that the involvement of the Trauma Intervention Program (TIP) would be of benefit to the
Citizen Corps Program.
R:~trafficm~nutes\012303 1 3
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:28 P.M. Chairman Lanier formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, February
27, 2003, at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula.
Chairman Scott Lanier
Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle
ITEM NO. 2
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: ~ Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic
DATE: February 27, 2003
SUBJECT: Item 2
State Route 79 North (Winchester Road) - Construction Scheduling and
Traffic Signal Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the report.
BACKGROUND:
This item has been placed on the agenda at the request of Chairman Connerton. Ms. Elaine Johnson,
representative from Supervisor Venable's office will make a brief presentation regarding State Route 79 North
(Winchester Road) construction scheduling and traffic signal improvements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
1
ITEM NO. 3
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: ~ Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic
DATE: February 27, 2003
SUBJECT: Item 3
Request for Multi-Way Stop Signs - Butterfield Stage Road and Channel
Street/Welton Way
RECOMMENDATION:
That thc Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council and thc County of Riverside
Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop signs at thc intersection of But~erfield
Stage Road and Wclton Way/Channel Street.
BACKGROUND:
Over the past few months both City of Temecula and County of Riverside staff have received several requests
to consider installation of stop signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Channel Street/Welton
Way to reduce vehicular speeds and provide a controlled crossing during school hours. The public has been
notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration o£this issue through the agenda notification
process and by mail.
In April 2002, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered a request from Kids In Danger (KID) to install
traffic control devices at several locations near schools throughout the City. This intersection was one o£the
locahons considered. The specific request received from KID was for the installation o£multi-way stop signs
to address heavy congestion during school "pick-up" and "drop-off' times. At that time, it was stalT s opinion
that multi-way stop signs would not alleviate traffic congestion and that a full time multi-way stop control was
not an appropriate device to mitigate conditions at the intersection. It was also staff's opinion that a traffic
signal was a more appropriate traffic control device for the intersection. The Commission approved the staff
recoramendation to maintain the present level o£control at the intersection and to add the intersection to the list
of potential traffic signal locations £or consideration during the budget review process.
Butterfield Stage Road between State Route 79 and Nighthawk Pass is classified as a 76 foot wide £our (4) lane
Major Highway on the City's General Plan Circulation Element with two travel lanes in each direction, a raised
median and a bike lane in each direction. The east half of Butterfield Stage Road lies within the County of
Riverside's jurisdiction. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Butterfield Stage Road is approximately 6,200
south of State Route 79 and approximately 3,200 south o£ Channel Street/Welton Way. The speed limit is
posted at 50 MPH on Burterfield Stage Road. However, during school hours the speed limit is posted at 25
MPH in accordance with the provisions o£ the California Vehicle Code.
Welton Way is a short entry way street that functions as a residential collector street providing access from
Butterfield Stage Road to numerous single-family residential units and Vail Ranch Middle School. The ADT
on Welton Way is approximately 2,800. The speed limit is posted at 25 MPH on Welton Way. Welton Way
functions as a Suggested Route to School providing direct access to Vail Ranch Middle School.
Channel Street, located in the County of Riverside, is a residential street that functions as a residential collector
street providing access from Butterfield Stage Road and Nighthawk Pass to numerous single-family residential
units. The ADT on Channel Street is approximately 2,600. The speed limit is not posted on Channel Street.
Channel Street functions as a Suggested Route to School provk~mg direct access to Vail Ranch Middle School.
In order to evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs, entering vehicular volume data was collected and
accident history was reviewed for the intersection. This data along with an evaluation of other roadway
conditions was used to perform a Multi-Way Stop Warrant analysis.
A review of the accident history for the twelve (12) month period from January 1, 2002 to December 31,2002,
indicates that there were no reported collisions at this intersection. This indicates that the majority of drivers
are exercising due care when traveling through the intersection.
The Caltrans Traffic Manual indicates that the multi-way stop signs may be useful at locations where the
volume of traffic on intersecting roads is approximately equal and/or where a combination of high speed,
restricted sight distance and an accident history indicates that assignment of right-of-way is necessary. Multi-
way stop signs should not be used for controlling vehicular speed. There are three (3) criteria that Caltrans
has established for the evaluation of Multi-Way Stop signs. These criteria are as follows:
1. Where signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim measure that
can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal
installations.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five (5) or more reported accidents within a twelve (12) month
period ora type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include
right and letS-tam collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum Traffic Volumes
a. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least
500 vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day, and
b. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must
average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight (8) hours, with an average delay to
minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour,
but
c. When the 85~h percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour,
the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements.
The Multi-Way Stop Warrant analysis performed for the intersection indicates that the minimum traffic volume
warrant is satisfied and Multi-Way Stop signs are warranted at the intersection. The reasons that the minimum
warrants are now satisfied, unlike April 2002, is that homes east of Butterfield Stage Road are now fully
occupied and Channel Street has been opened between Butterfield Stage Road and Nighthawk Pass.
Therefore, in order to improve the safety of students and adults when crossing Butterfield Stage Road, staff is
recommending the installation of Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and
Welton Way/Channel Street.
2
Although, Multi-Way Stop signs are being recommended at this time, as an interim measure, the Public/Traffic
Safety Commission can still make a recommendation that the City Council and the County Board of
Supervisors include this location on the list of potential future traffic signal locations. Since Butterfield Stage
Road is a major north/south arterial, which serves a developing area of the City and County, a traffic signal is
still the most efficient means of providing traffic control at this intersection.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available in the Public Works Routine Street Maintenance Account for signing and striping.
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" - Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting Minutes and Agenda Report, April 25, 2002
3. Exhibit "C" - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
3
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
Channel St
Welton Way
EXHIBIT "B"
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES AND AGENDA REPORT
APRIL 25, 2002
MINUTES OF A REGULAR
MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
APRIL 25, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission convened in a regular meeting
at 6:00 P.M., on Thursday, April 25, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula
City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
FLAG SALUTE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Wedel.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Coe, Connerton, Katan, Wedel,
and Chairman Lanier.
Absent: None.
Also Present: Director of Public Works Hughes,
Senior Engineer Moghadam,
Associate Engineer Gonzalez,
Fire Captain McBride,
Police Lieutenant Pingel,
Police Sergeant Lohman,
Administrative Secretary Pyle, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Presentation re,qardin,q the Community Action Patrol (CAP) Team Pre.qram - Officer Bob
Ridley
Officer Ridley provided an overview of the Community Action Patrol (CAP) Program, a
volunteer program that he oversees, noting the following:
· That the CAP vehicles had been donated, one of which was a Ford Explorer donated
by City Manager Nelson, and the other a Chevrolet pick-up truck donated by the
Public Works Depadment;
· That currently there were nine members, introducing the four members that were
present, relaying that there were an additional four volunteers in the Citizen
Academy;
· That there were hopes of receiving additional vehicles in the future;
· That the CAP responsibilities included the following: patrolling the City, and
contacting the dispatch center if witnessing any unusual activity, aid in directing
traffic, aid in missing children incidents · vacation house checks, and · school site
patrolling; and
· That the volunteers typically work in pairs in a CAP vehicle with a third volunteer
acting as a dispatCher, and if no member was present at the dispatch center, the
volunteers utilized their own cell phones and dispatched from the vehicles.
Mr. Larry O'Keefe, CAP member, provided additional information regarding the CAP
Program, relaying the following:
· That the program had a weekly schedule, which he distributed to the Commission, as
well as a list of patrol stop requests;
· That there was a need for cell phones for utilization in the program;
· That there was a goal was to make the public more aware of the program in order for
the volunteers to be utilized more efficiently;
· That the ability to have direct communication with the Police Depadment would be a
benefit; and
· Queried whether the CAP volunteers could do anything to aid the Public/Traffic
Safety Commission (i.e., patrol specified troubled areas, direct traffic, etc.)
For Commissioner Connerton, Mr. O'Keefe confirmed that the CAP Program was under
the jurisdiction of the Police Department; and in response to Chairman Lanier, noted the
desire to let residents know that one did not have to be a senior citizen to become a
member.
Commissioner Connerton advised that in the future, the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission may request the CAP volunteers to work in the school areas where there
was excessive traffic.
In response to Chairman Lanier, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that the Public
Works Department had no available cell phones or radios.
Noting that recently safety tips have been added to the Public Works Department's news
release, Chairman Lanier advised that via e-mail (to either Chairman Lanier or Police
Sergeant Lohman) CAP information could be forwarded for consideration for inclusion in
the news release; and additionally suggested that flyers be posted, which would make
the public aware of the need for additional volunteers.
· Ms. Laurie J. Casper, representing ForTel Traffic, Inc., demonstrated for the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission the vehicle calming traffic sign, which the City recently
ordered, noting the following:
· That the device was utilized primarily in school areas and heavy traffic areas;
· That per recent studies, the device slowed seventeen percent (17%) of all vehicles.
approaching the sign;
· That even in sunlight motorists can see the bright lit signage from 1,000 feet; and
· . Demonstrated how the radar unit registers the oncoming vehicle's speed and then
displays (flashes) that speed.
For Commissioner Connerton, Ms. Casper noted that the speed was displayed once,
Subsequently displaying the following vehicle's speed; and relayed that the device could
be mounted numerous places.
In to Commissioner Connerton, Senior Engineer Moghadam relayed that the
response
City ordered four of the devices, confirming that the devices' locations would be rotated;
for Commissioner Katan, noted that the devices the City ordered were proximate in size
to the one being demonstrated; and for Commissioner Wedel, relayed that the device
would also record the speeds collected which could be downloaded for study purposes.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Robert Purmont, 45099 Corte Valle, noted that he came to address the topic of
deception on the part of police officers and their supervisors; opined that in alternate
cities, as the population rises, the Police Department operates in a self-serving manner,
which victimizes the citizens; citied examples of corruption in other entities, such as the
courts, religious institutions, and etc.; opined that the Temecula Police Department was
not serving the public when patrolling (for the purpose of issuing citations) on Jefferson
Avenue between Via Montezuma and Del Rio Road, which was not an area with
numerous accidents.
Thanking Mr. Purmont for addressing his comments, Police Sergeant Lohman advised
that Mr. Purmont could make a copy of the notes he had brought and that he and Police
Sergeant Lohman could address his concerns without the same time constraints
imposed during the public comment period of a hearing, relaying that Mr. Purmont could
either call, or come down to the station.
For informational purposes, Commissioner Coe noted that based on his travels through
numerous cities, it was his opinion that Temecula Police Department was the finest
police department he has ever seen.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of March 28, 2002.
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. School Area Traffic Circulation - Kids in Danger (KID) Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission take the following action:
1. Direct staff to continue imposing restricted hours/days of operation for
construction activities around school sites;
2. Recommend that the existing stdping on Plo Pico Road in front of
Sparkman Elementary School not be changed;
3. Recommend that the present level of traffic control on Rancho Vista
Road at Temecula Valley High School be maintained;
4. Recommend that the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Avenida La
Reina be included on the list of potential traffic signal locations for
consideration of partial funding during the budget review process;
5. Direct staffto develop a special traffic signal timing plan to
accommodate school peak hour traffic at the intersection of Margarita
Road at Ranch Vista Road;
6. Recommend that the present ievel of traffic control at the intersection
of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate Street be
maintained; and
7. Recommend that the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton
Way/Choate Street be included on the list of potential traffic signal
locations for consideration during the budget review process.
Providing a detailed overview of the staff report (of record), Senior Engineer Moghadam
relayed the following information regarding the several suggestions the Kids in Danger
(KID) Committee (a group of concerned parents) brought to the City's attention with
respect to safety issues related to the City's school sites:
· With respect to the concern regarding the construction activities proximate to school
sites, in particular during the hours of the schools operation, noted that while to the
extent feasible construction hours were limited to certain periods of time when traffic
would be less impacted, that the contractors needed a certain window of time to
complete their work.
· With respect to the desire to remove the bike lane on Plo Pico Road proximate to the
school site in order to allow parking in this area, relayed that due to the width of the
road, there would not be adequate space to provide for parking in this area.
· With respect to the recommendation to install a three-way stop on Ranch Vista Road
at the high school exit driveway, noted that with the exception of the time when there
is school traffic generated, the installation would be requiring drivers to stop for no
good reason which ultimately renders the installation ineffective, advising that a
better solution would be the installation of a traffic signal, noting that a
recommendation was provided to the School District that if there was consideration
to participate in the costs of the construction of the signal, as well as implementing
on-site modifications in the parking lot, the City was willing to consider placing a
signal at this location; and noted that this particular signal was on the pdodty list.
· Regarding the concerns with respect to Winchester Road proximate to Chaparral
High School, relayed that with respect to extending the left-turn, lane at
westbound/southbound Margarita Road, noted that staff could recommend to
Caltrans that this particular left-turn pocket be extended; advised that numerous
issues relayed would need to be addressed by the School District and/or Caltrans,
including adding exit driveways to Winchester Road, and installing two-right turn
lanes out of the main driveway at Chaparral High School at Nicolas Road; and
· With respect to the recommendation to install a temporary traffic signal or a stop sign
at Buttedield Stage Road/Weiton Way, advised that while a stop sign would only be
effective during the school start and release times, that it has been relayed that if the
School District placed a crossing guard at this location, the City would install striping
for a crosswalk as well as installing appropriate signage, additionally noting that half
of this intersection was in the County and whatever installations were proposed in
this area would need to be approved by the County.
Ms. Adrienne Potter, 30816 Medinah Way, representing KID, noted appreciation for
Senior Engineer Moghadam due to his thorough and expedient response to the school
issues which were presented to him by this particular committee; provided an overview
of various school site issues she has dealt with in the past in alternate cities; noted that
on Margarita Road, the 25 MPH speed limit signs were placed on the wrong side of the
intersection; advised that most of the cities in California utilize retirees for crosswalk
supervision; and concurred with the concepts presented by staff regarding various joint
funding efforts between the City and the School District in order to install much-needed
traffic implementations (i.e., signals).
For Ms. Potter, Senior Engineer Moghadam noted that the most important factor at the
Avenida La Reina location would be to connect the parking lots in order to allow access
from one lot to another.
For information purposes, Chairman Lanier relayed the time restrictions associated with
public comments.
In response to Commissioner Coe, Ms. Potter relayed that this organization, KID, was
recently formed, confirming that she had formed similar committees in other cities, citing
projects which had been implemented due to committee efforts; for Commissioner
Connerton, relayed that for fifteen years she has been a safety activist; noted that the
School District was provided a copy of the letter which was provided to the City; for
Commissioner Coe, noted that there were approximately 25 interested members on the
KID Committee; and for Commissioner Katan, confirmed that it was Mr. McKinney from
the School District that the committee had scheduled a meeting with.
Commissioner Connerton noted that in the City'of Temecula the School District and the
City had a good working relationship with ongoing open dialogue; and applauded Ms.
Potter for her efforts.
Commissioner Katan advised that once the committee had met with Mr. McKinney from
the School District significant progress would begin.
Ms. Sherry Stanfill, 29970 Rancho California Road, # 80, echoed Ms. Potter's comments
regarding appreciation to staff for all their efforts regarding this agenda item; via
overheads, specified her concerns regarding the Joan F. Sparkman Elementary School
site, noting the ongoing illegal parking occurring while parents wait to pick up their
children, specifying all available parking areas including a dirt lot which is currently being
utilized; recommended that there be a loading zone created, prohibiting parking, and
allowing a larger area for parents to pick up their children; noted that she was a
proponent for the bike lane being removed, allowing parking on the south and north side
of the street; with respect to Vail Ranch Middle School, recommended restricting the
f parking on the west side of Buttedield Stage Road in order to improve the flow of the
children pick up process; and for Commissioner Katan, specified the areas where school
staff was currently parking off-site due to the lack of parking provisions.
For informational purposes, Fire Captain McBride advised that removal of the bike lanes
in order to allow parking would not be feasible due to Fire Department width and
distance requirements; and noted that enforcement would need to be increased in light
of the plethora of illegal parking in this area in order to ensure that there was Fire
Department access was available at all times.
Mr. Jeff Okun, representing the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD),
expressed appreciation to the Public Works Department staff, advising that if there was
an issue needing to be addressed he would typically set up a meeting with Senior
Engineer Moghadam in order to analyze the matter; recommended that with regard to
this issue, that City staff and the TVUSD staff work together to address the matter;
advised that at the Joan F. Sparkman Elementary School site, the charter school was
being removed from this site which would open up the lower parking lot for additional
parking; and commenting on the adequate parking provisions at the Vail Ranch Middle
School site, advised that the greatest significant negative impact in his view was the
plethora of U-turns movements made at this location.
For informational purposes and for future plans for school sites, Commissioner
Connerton recommended that the School District have the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission review the development plans and circulation issues for proposed school
sites, as was conducted with the Ysabel Barnett Elementary School site. In response,
Mr. Okun relayed that the School District coordinates with the City's Engineering
Department on all future school sites, advising that he would take this recommendation
under consideration.
Commissioner Katan noted his support of staff's recommendation, relaying hopes that
the KID Committee's upcoming meeting with Mr. McKinney from the School Distdct
would be productive.
Concurring with Commissioner Katan's comments, Commissioner Coe, echoed by
Commissioner Connerton, commended staff for the thorough manner in which this issue
was addressed.
Commissioner Wedel noted that he was pleased with the cooperative efforts between
the City and the School District.
Relaying his concurrence with previous Commission comments, Chairman Lanier
advised that in the past two to three years the cooperative efforLs between the City and
the School Board have greatly improved; advised that there was a Joint City
Council/TVUSD Advisory Committee (with Councilman Naggar and Mayor Roberts
serving on this panel), noting that, if deemed necessary, the issues addressed at
tonight's meeting could be further addressed by this particular committee.
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve staff's recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Coe and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
3. Traffic Conditions - Milky Way and Rancho California Road
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission take the following action:
1. Recommend that the current pdma facie speed limit of 25 MPH is
maintained on Milky Way;
2. Recommend the installation of 25 MPH speed limit signs on Milky
Way with additional enforcement; and
3. Recommend that the current posted speed limit of 50 MPH on
Rancho California Road between Moraga Road and Margarita
Road be maintained.
Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the staff report (per agenda material), noting that
a few years ago the City conducted a study evaluating all the streets within the Starlight
Ridge Community including Milky Way; advised that as a result of that particular
analysis, several stop signs had been installed and enforcement was increased which
rendered good results; relayed that after conducting another speed survey on Ranch
California Road and Milky Way, the analysis determined that there were no unusual
conditions occurring in this area, ergo staff was not recommending any changes in
speed limits, but was recommending the installation of 25 MPH limits signs (which was
the prima facie speed) on Milky Way, that.Milky Way be placed on a list to receive
installation of the radar speed display signs (as demonstrated earlier in the meeting),
and that enforcement be increased in this area.
Per review of the speed data associated with this item, Commissioner Wedel noted, for
the Police Department's information, that there appeared to be a single driver traveling
between 56-70 MPH in this 25 MPH zone.
While noting that at times vehicles traveling in the downhill area of Asteroid Way (across
from the shopping center) had difficulty exiting, Commissioner Connerton concurred with
staff's recommendation.
Providing a history of the Starlight Ridge traffic issues, and the activism of the residents
in this area, Commissioner Coe supported staff's recommendation.
Commissioner Katan recommended additionally that the Stage I of Traffic Calming
Program be implemented.
MOTION: Commissioner Coe moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion
was seconded by Commissioner Wedel and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
4. Status Report- Winchester Road Pedestrian Bridqe at Nicolas Road
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file this status
report.
Providing an update regarding the intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road,
Director of Public Works Hughes presented the staff report (of record); noted that in spite
of expressed concern, it was determined that Chaparral High School would be located at
the existing site which was outside of the City's control; noted that in 1999, a task force
was formed which included the Police Depadment, School officials, and City staff which
evaluated the intersection as to whether there were any feasible improvements which
could be installed at this location; relayed that it was determined that there should be an
exit driveway added on Winchester Road due to the vehicular/pedestrian conflicts which
when installed effectively reduced a vast amount of conflicting movements; advised that
at the School District's request staff has been working with the School officials to
investigate the installation of lit electronic flashing school zone signs which are utilized
on City streets, noting that Caltrans would not permit the installations on Winchester
Road due to the device not being approved by Caltrans; noted that in May, of 2001,
there was a fatality at this location which occurred on a Sunday evening (and was not
associated with school pedestrian traffic) involving a small child who was crossing the
street with his parents, clarifying that the child was struck by a vehicle which was out of
control due to the driver being impaired due to a medical condition which rendered the
driver unconscious; relayed that this type of accident was not caused due to the design
of the intersection; advised that subsequent to the accident, the City Council
appropriated approximately $400,000 last year in order to investigate the installation of a
pedestrian crossing at this location, additionally noting that there have been additional
monies pledged by developers to be utilized towards the funding of a pedestrian
crossing; cladfied that this particular intersection was not owned, operated, or controlled
by the City of Temecula, advising that this road was a State Highway and that Caltrans
had full jurisdiction; noted that after numerous meetings (held between June of 2001 to
November of 2001) with Caltrans officials, the City received a letter from Caltrans stating
that certain criteria needed to be met in order for Caltrans to consider approving a
pedestrian overcrossing, and that Caltrans did not support installation of a pedestrian
crossing at this location due to the existing controls which were considered adequate
with the existing conditions; relayed that after additional meetings with Caltrans, Caltrans
took the position that although Caltrans would not support the crossing, there would be
no objection to the City pursuing the installation of a crossing which could meet the
dictated criteria; relayed that at this point the City has hired an engineering company to
investigate avenues to meet the criteria (dictated by Caltrans), advising that this contract
will be completed in six to eight weeks; and relayed that the study results would most
likely be brought to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, in order for the Commission to
make a recommendation to the City Council,
Director of Public Works Hughes provided additional information regarding the
constraints associated with the Pedestrian Bridge Project, as follows:
· Queried the avenue to pursue which would effectively encourage pedestrians to
utilize the pedestrian bridge, noting that the signalized intersection could not be
closed for pedestrians;
· Noted the likelihood of the majority of school students crossing without utilizing the
bddge;
· Advised that pedestrian crossings were generally successful when located in areas
where there could be physical restraints from crossing elsewhere, which forced
pedestrians to utilize an overpass;
· Relayed that various options were bdng explored with the study (i.e., the installation
of elevators, tunnel-type crossings);
· Noted that the analysis had indicated that approximately 150-200 students cross in
this area in the morning and again in the afternoon; provided additional information
regarding the feasibility of installing an elevator which would meet the needed
capacity for the pedestrian traffic which would only be present for a short period of
time;
· Relayed potential liability issues if certain crossing implementations were installed in
this area;
· Advised that future road improvements (i.e., transit structures) in this area may
increase the span necessary for the crossing; and
· Noted staffs concern regarding establishing a Citywide precedent, whereby
residents will request that additional overcrossings be installed.
Commissioner Coe commended staff for efforts regarding the investigation of this item.
For Commissioner Coe, Director of Public Works Hughes noted one Councilmember's
continuing concern regarding the location of the campus; advised that it was Caltrans'
opinion, which he supported, that the existing provisions were adequate, that the
visibility conditions were good, and that the signalized crossing as well as the school
signage effectively benefited this area; opined that it was the drivers' and pedestrians'
responsibility to be aware of how to utilize the facilities correctly, advising that the
majority of accidents in these type of areas were not due to the fault of the design of a
system, but caused by driver behavior or pedestrians not recognizing the significant
danger that exists if the rules of the road are not followed;
In response, Commissioner Coe opined that the City was wasting money by continuing
to study an installation which will most likely not be feasible and not permitted by the
State; and concurred with Director of Public Works Hughes' comments, that the impetus
for maintaining safety was ddver and pedestrian awareness.
Commissioner Katan noted that he looked forward to reviewing the results of the study.
Providing the rationale for requesting that this issue be agendized, Commissioner Wedel
' noted the desire for infOrmation regarding the history of this issue as well as an update,
advising that Director of Public Works Hughes presentation was comprehensive and
educational, thanking staff for the presentation.
For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the height of
the overcrossing would be approximately 17 feet, advising that there may be a
requirement to exceed the minimum height due to Winchester Road serving as an
alternate route to the freeway.
Commissioner Connerton commented on the necessary height and length of the
overcrossing which would most likely render the project not feasible; and advised that
utilizing these funds for alternate traffic solutions in the City would be more prudent.
Director of Public Works Hughes noted the benefits of conducting the study due to staff
being able to provide a recommendation after exhausting every possible solution; and
advised that most likely there will be an accident at this location at some point in the
future which most likely will be caused by a driver mistake or from an individual not
practicing safe habits; reiterated staff's desire to explore this intersection thoroughly; and
for informational purposes, noted that approximately half of the students crossing at this
intersection (while he was observing) were being dropped off by their parents across the
street from the school which was why they needed to cross this roadway to access the
school
MOTION: Commissioner Connerton moved to approve staff's recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Katan and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
A. Apprising the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Senior Engineer Moghadam
noted the positive feedback received from the residents regarding the stop signs
which were installed on Vail Ranch.
B. Via a video presentation, Senior Engineer Moghadam presented the crosswalk
timer device, which was installed today (April 25, 2002) at Ynez Road/Motor Car
Parkway as a test site (proximate to the Guidant use.)
C. Per comments received at a recent City Council meeting, Director of Public
Works Hughes relayed that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be
addressing speeding issues in the Promenade Chardonnay Hills area, advising
that when the Commission last addressed this issue, Stage I of the Traffic
Calming Program had been implemented; noted that one of the residents in this
area desires to have stop signs installed, and that the Mayor has determined that
since the issue was addressed approximately one year ago by the Public/Traffic
Safety Commission, that the Commission should re-agendize the matter.
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
A. Providing an update, Police Sergeant Lohman relayed that up to this point in time
during the month of April over 650 hazardous violations have been issued, 77
non-hazardous citations, 45 parking citations, 77 NET citations, and 60 SLAP
citations; advised that the Enforce Responsible Alcohol Consumption in
Temecula (ERAClT) operation was conducted on April 12th; noted that due to
citizens complaining about excessive speeds in their neighborhoods radar trailers
were placed at various locations, advising that software has been ordered to
update the current radar trailer; and relayed that the Concerned Citizens Letter
Writing Program was implemented which is a program whereby a citizen who
witnesses unsafe driving behaviors can call or e-mail Police Sergeant Lohman,
and subsequently a letter is sent to the driver, stating that they were observed
violating certain codes, advising that 11 letters have been sent up to this point.
B. Police Sergeant Lohrnan relayed that the Tip-a-Cop Program was scheduled for
May 2, 2002, at the Claim Jumper Restaurant whereby off-duty Police Officers
will help serve food in the interest of raising tips for the upcoming Special
Olympics Event.
C. For Commissioner Coe, Police Lieutenant Pingel relayed that in comparison to
alternative cities within the County, the City of Temecula has fewer DUI arrests,
as well as other serious incidents due to better driving behaviors in the City.
D. Commissioner Connerton commended the Police Department for their excellent
work, in particular regarding the ERACIT Program enforcement.
E. For Commissioner Katan, Police Lieutenant Pingel relayed that roving patrols
yielded more DUI citations than the DUI checkpoints.
Commissioner Connerton opined that the DUI checkpoints served as an effective
deterrent, Commissioner Wedel commenting on the good public relations created
between the Police Department and the public at the checkpoints, commending
the Police Officers.
Police Sergeant Lohman confirmed, for Commissioner Coe, that the designated
driver concept was effective in preventing accidents and fatalities.
F. For Chairman Lanier, Police Lieutenant Pingel relayed that he would keep the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission posted regarding the next Every Fifteen
Minutes Program in order for the Commission to be involved in the program.
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
A. Updating the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Fire Captain McBride noted that
the laptop installations project in the Fire Vehicles was proceeding, noting that he
anticipated the devices to be installed in approximately two months.
B. Fire Captain McBride relayed that the Fire Department's website (which was part
of the City's website) was being updated.
C. For informational purposes, Fire Captain McBride advised that the fire season
has begun.
D. Apprising the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, Fire Captain McBride noted that
in the upcoming agenda packets the Public/Traffic Safety Commission would be
receiving the Fire Department report which was prepared for the City Council.
E. Fire Captain McBride relayed that the Western Days Event had been a success
with no negative incidents (i.e., injuries, or sickness).
COMMISSION REPORTS
A. Commissioner Connerton requested that the area at Honors Ddve and the first
street (as one is traveling east on Margarita Road) be an agendized issue due to
the negative impact of the line of sight conditions.
B. Noting that there was an asphalt ramp located on Margarita Road at Temecula
Valley High School at the drop-off zone, Commissioner Connerton requested that
staff investigate the matter of having the ramp removed.
C. For Commissioner Connerton, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed that
while new concepts were often being explored that the City controls the traffic
signals, advising that prior to the installation of strobes (by any agency) which
interrupt the synchronization of the signals by any the City would have to be
involved.
D. Commissioner Connerton commended Senior Engineer Moghadam and
Associate Engineer Gonzales for the well-prepared data associated with the KiD
Committee recommendations which was on tonight's agenda.
E. For Commissioners Katan and Connerton, Police Lieutenant Pingel advised that
provisions for radio communications for the CAP team will be acquired after
investigation, providing additional information regarding the restrictions
associated with the matter; and for Chairman Lanier, and Commissioner Katan,
noted that the Public/Traffic Safety Commission would be updated regarding this
issue (i.e., via the Police Chief's Report.)
F. Commissioner Katan recommended that the issue of increasing the public
comment period of time be agendized.
Senior Engineer Moghadam and Director of Public Works Hughes noted that the
Chairman could extend the public comments time, if deemed necessary.
Additional discussion ensued regarding this matter, and it was the consensus of
the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to agendize the issue, Commissioner
Wedel requesting that staff provide a legal opinion at that time.
G. For informational purposes, Commissioner Connerton provided the data and
times of the Fiddler on the Roof play which Commissioner Coe would be starring
in which was scheduled for May 9, 10, 11, and 12.
H. Chairman Lanier noted that he would provide to staff, for distribution to the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission, information regarding the installation of speed
bumps.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. L. Borok, 30476 Milano Road, commented on reducing traffic impacts,
recommending that the schools implement a program whereby the star and release
times would be staggered.
R:~baffi cminutes~042502 12
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:36 P.M. Chairman Lanier formally adjourned this meeting to Thursday, May 23,
2002 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Chairman Scott Lanier
Administrative Secretary Anita Pyle
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: ~ Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic
DATE: April 25, 2002
SUBJECT: Item 2
School Area Traffic Circulation - Requested By Kids In Danger (KID)
Committee
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission:
1. Direct Staffto continue imposing restricted hours/days of operation for construction activities around
school sites; and
2.Recommend not to change the existing striping on Plo Pico Road in front of Sparkman Elementary
School; and
3.Recommend that the present level of traffic control be maintained on Rancho Vista Road at Temecula
Valley High School; and
4. Recommend that the intersection of Rancho Vista Road at Avenida De La Reina be included on the
list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration of partial funding during the budget review
process; and
5.Direct Staffto develop a special traffic signal timing plan to accommodate school peak hour traffic at
the intersection of Margarita Road at Rancho Vista Road; and
6.Recommend that the present level of traffic control be maintaine4 at the intersection of Butterfield _
Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate S~eet; and
7.Recommend that the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate Street be included
on the list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration during the budget review process. ,
BACKGROUND:
In'March 2002, staffreceived a-letter from Kids In Danger (KID) a committee of parents, requesting that the
City address traffic circulation issues identified at various schools in the City of Temecula. The letter, which
contained seven areas of concern, included potential solutions to the problems identified. The public has been
notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification
process and by mail.
Margarita Middle School
KID Concern: Construction at Margarita Middle School During Student Pick-up and Drop-OftTimes.
KID Proposed Solution: City should inform contractors that construction is allowed only from 8:20 a.m. to
2:45p. m. and after 3:10 p.m.; allow construction on Saturdays and holidays if necessary.
I
r:\traffic\commissn\agenda~02\0425\KIDS Citywide Scheol Issues/ajp
~he City is very sensitive to parking and traffic circulation at school sites during student pick-up and drop-off
times. In fact, staffcurrently requires that any construction work occurring in the public fight-of-way adjacent
to school sites, be performed during restricted hours and days. Typically, it is staff's preference that
construction work be performed during school holidays or on weekends. However, there are circumstances
when construction schedules cannot accommodate these requirements. When this occurs, steps are taken to
divid~ the construction activity into multiple phases of construction to minimize traffic circulation impacts.
Additionally, weekend traffic at some schools is just as heavy as weekday traffic due to the City sponsored
sports activities occurring on-site. This situation makes it very difficult to restrict construction work to '
weekends only without affecting on-street parking and traffic circulation during these activities. Moreover,
since these activities usually last all day, the traffic impacts are over a longer period of time on the weekend
than during the week, which are short-term impacts and usually affect only a short window of time in the
moming and afternoon.
Staff will continue to impose workday and work hour restrictions around school sites, construction
schedules permitting, to eliminate conflicts between construction and school traffic.
Sparkman Elementary School
KID Concern: Bike Lane and parking constraints.
KID Proposed Solution: Remove bike lane and relocate to a different street or change bike lane to dotted
line in front of school.
Last year, staffevaluated a similar request, which was generated by Sparkman Elementary School's Principal
and Commissioner Edwards. Pio Pico Road, which is 44 feet wide curb to curb, presently accommodates a 10-
foot left-turn lane, a 12-foot travel lane in each direction, and 5-foot bike lanes on each side of the roadway.
The evaluation determined that even with the removal of the bike lanes, a 17-foot wide travel lane is not wide
enough to safely accommodate on-street parking.
In order to accommodate on-street parking in front of Sparkman Elementary School, the left-torn lane on Pio
Pico Road would have to be removed. This is an option that would not, be supported by staff. The elimination
of the left-turn lane would severely impact the traffic signal operation at Margarita Road as well as, the overall
traffic circulation at Sparkman Elementa~ School. The left-mm lane provides storage for westbound left-mm
movements at Margarita Road and eastbound left-turn movements at Calle'Redondella.
In so far as the availability of parkingqoading areas at Sparkman Elementary School, an on-street loading area
has been provided on Margarita Road adjacent to the school site. Loading and parking is also available on-site
at the Margarita Road parking lot and Pio Pico Road parking lot. Additional on-street parking is available on
Calle Redondella.
For these reasons, staff does not recommend any changes to the existing striping. However, we would
encourage the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD) to explore other o~-site parking
alternatives.
Temecula Valley High School
KID Concern: Heavy traffic during drop-off and pick-up times that causes congestion in the nearby
intersection.
KID Proposed Solution: Install 3-way stop sign at main exit to Rancho Vista, have school repaint parking
lot arrows, have school add signs showing proper traffic flow around parMng lo~ Extend left-turn lane on
Margarita Road at Rancho Vista Road.
2
r:~traffic\commissnXagenda~2002\0425\KIDS Cilywide School Issues/ajp
In the past, both staff and the Public/Traffic Safety Commission have addressed similar issues regarding
parking and circulation around Temecula Valley High School. In April 2000, staffmet with representatives of
TVUSD and the high school to discuss on-site circulation issues and circulation issues on Rancho Vista Road.
At that time, staff indicated that the installation of a traffic signal at the school's main access driveway alone,
without on-site circulation modifications, would not resolve the circulation issues. Staff suggested that the
district hire a professional Traffic Engineer to develop access alternatives that would address the district's
concerns. Also, as a result of the meeting, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approved the extension of the
white curb along Margarita Road to increase the on-street loading zone area. In March 2001, the City modified
the existing striping along Rancho Vista Road to accommod/~te revised ingress/egress modifications to the high
school.
While we agree with the KID proposed solution that the school's on-site circulation needs to be revised to
mitigate the impacts to Rancho Vista Road, we do not agree that a multi-way stop control would improve
traffic circulation on Rancho Vista Road. Moreover, a multi-way stop control would be a full time traffic
control device used to mitigate a condition that occurs twice a day for only a short period of time. During the
remainder of the twenty-four (24) hours when the multi-way stop control is not needed to assign right-of-way,
motorists will be forced to stop needlessly, which eventually promotes the violation of traffic control devices.
It is staff's opinion that the only viable traffic control device at the school's main access driveway is a traffic
signal along with modifications to the on-site circulation. Therefore, staff does not recommend the
installation of a multi-way stop control on Rancho Vista Road.
In so far as, extending the southbound left-turn lane on Margarita Road that is an option that can be explored.
However, it is our opinion that the practical short-tcrm solution is to provide a special traffic signal timing plan
during the morning and afternoon school peak hours to accommodate the heavy turning movements associated
with those peaks. A similar plan was implemented at the intersection of Margarita Road and North General
Kearny Road last year, which h~s improved traffic flow during the morning and afternoon school peak hours.
For these reasons, staff is recommending the development of a special timing plan to accommodate the
school related peak hour traffic.
As previously mentioned the solution to reliving congestion at nearby intersections and improving
traffic circulation at Temecula Valley Itlgh Schoolbegins with improvements to the high school parking
lots. We strongly encourage TVUSD to pursue the modification of the on-site circulation to alleviate the
off-site traffic congestion. Therefore, staff is recommending that the intersection of Rancho Vista Road
at Avenida De La Reina be added to the list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration of
partial funding during the budget review process.
Chaparral High School
KID Concern: Heavy congestion during pick-up and dmp-off times.
KID Proposed Solution: Open additional exits from school parking lot to Winchester Road and restrlpe
Winchester Road in front of school to add exit lane for cars leaving school ,4dd left-turn lane from
Winchester Road to Margarita Road and vice-versa.
Staff has reviewed the issue of additional left-turn lanes on Winchester Road at Nicolas Road and Margarita
Road in the past. In April 2000, staff performed an evaluation of turning movement count data at the
intersection of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. The data indicates that the volume, at the time, would
warrant a dual left-turn lane at the intersection. However, the access road stripingwould have to be modified
to accommodate the dual left-turn movements from Winchester Road into the school's parking lot. The access
r:\traffic~commissnXagenda~002\0425\KlDS Citywid,e School Issues/ajp
road is a private roadway under ownership of the TVUSD and the senior ho~sing complex. Any modifications
to the roadway striping would have to be performed by TVUSD and approved by the owners of the senior
housing complex. Staffcontacted district representatives and advised them of the results of the evaluation and
subsequent needed improvements. The installation of the additional left4um lane cannot go forward unless the
access road improvements are installed by TVUSD and the additional left-turn lane is approved by Caltrans.
Currently, at the intersection of Winchester Road at Margarita Road there are dual left-mm lanes for every
direction, except the eastbound to northbound left-mm movement which will be provided in the near future
with the development of the Harveston project. The present width of Winchester Road cannot accommodate a
third westbound left-turn lane as proposed by KID. Moreover, Margarita Road is presently striped for two
southbound through lanes and is not wide enough to accommodate a third through lane to receive the
additional left4um movement.
Since Winchester Road is a state owned and maintained facility, any improvements on the state highway such
as, additional driveways onto Winchester Road, modification to the existing striping, and the installation of
additional left-mm lanes would require approval from Caltrans. Presently, a fight-turn egress is provided onto
Winchester Road from the school's parking lot. It is unlikely that Caltrans will approve any additional
driveway openings onto Winchester Road from Chaparral High School. Moreover, this is an alternative that
staff will not support or recommend.
In so far as a third left-mm lane from Winchester Road onto Margarita Road, it is not likely that Caltrans will
support this type of improvement nor is it an improvement that staffwould support. Our own experience with
attempting to implement a third northbound to westbound left-mm lane on Ynez Road at Winchester Road,
which was unsueeesgful, indicates that Caltrans is not very receptive to the idea. This is at a location where
left-turn vehicular volumes, during the majority of the day, justify a third left-mm lane, unlike Winchester
Road at Margarita Road where the morning and afternoon school p~a~ last a short period of time and do not
justify a third left-mm lane.
For these reasons, staff does not support the KID proposed solutions. However, staff encourages the
TVIJSD to pursue the implementation of an additional left-turn lane at Winchester Road and Nicolas
Road through Caltrans along with the necessary modifications to the access road, and explore the
possibility of providing access to Roripaugh Road through the construction zone on the north side of the
high school facility.
Vail Ranch Middle School
KID Concern: Heavy congestion durlng pick-up and drop-ofttimes.
KID Proposed Solution: Install 4-way stop sign, or temporary traffic signal at Butterfield Stage Road and
Walton Way for use during entrance and exit times, or permanent signal at intersection.
Shortly after the annexation of Vail Ranch, staff met with TVUSD representatives and the middle school
principal to discuss circulation and parking issues on streets surrounding Vail Ranch Middle School. Staff
received a request to modify traffic controls, curb markings and striping along Camino Piedra Rojo and
Butterfield Stage Road adjacent to the middle school site. Traffic controls were added at the intersection of
Camino ?iedra Rojo and Welton Way, curb markings were modified in front of the school and a southbound
left-turn lane was installed on Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Chaote Street. It was also determined
that there is approximately 500 feet of unrestricted on-street parking along Butterfield Stage Road directly
adjacent to the school, north of Welton Way. On-street parking is also available south of Welton Way on the
westside of Buttertield Stage Road.
4
r:\lraffic\commissnXagcnda~2002\0425XKIDS Citywide School Issues/ajp
The possibility of installing a multi-way stop control or a traffic signal wa~ discussed at the meeting. It was
agreed that the installation of a multi-way stop control would not alleviate the traffic congestion and that a full
time multi-way stop control is not an appropriate device to mitigate a condition that occurs twice a day for a
short period of time. During the remainder of the twenty-four (24) hours when the multi-way stop control is
not needed to assign right-of-way, motorists will be forced to stop needlessly, which creates unnecessary delays
and eventually promotes the violation of traffic control devices. Therefore, staff does not recommend the
installation of a multi-way stop control at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton
Way/Choate Street.
Although a traffic signal will not completely alleviate the traffic congestion at this intersection, it is staffs
opinion that a traffic signal is the only viable traffic control device, which does not stop traffic needlessly and
create unnecessary delays on Butterfield Stage Road. The use of a temporary traffic signal during peak school
times is not an option that staff would support.
Therefore, staff is recommending that the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at Welton Way/Choate
Street be added to the list of potential traffic signal locations for consideration during the budget review
process. Since the east side of Butterfield Stage Road lies within th9 unincorporated county area,
County of Riverside approval and participation in the cost of the traffic signal installation will be
necessary.
Location of School Sites
KID Concern: Schools are located on busy commuter street&
KID Proposed Solutiot~: Proper planning requires that schools be located away from commuter streets or
that they be designed with driveways long enough to enable parents to safely drop-off or pick-up their
children, and with a safe, unobstructed return to commuter street&
Both staffand the Public/Traffic Safety Commission share this concern. To that end, the Commission has
appointed a representative to act as the Commission's liaison to improve communication and coordination
between the City and the TVUSD. This has resulted in improved coordination during the facility planning
process.
Staff concurs with the KID proposed solutions and encourages the TVUSD to consider the viability of
the solutions during the facility planning process.
Crossing Guards in the City of Temecula
KID Cqncern: There are few crossing guards in Temecula.
KID Proposed Solutlon: Seekfundingforadditional crossing guards.
As the Commission is aware, the TVUSD is responsible for providing adult crossing guards at the various
school sites throughout the City. It is our opinion that the TVUSD is doing a "good job" of keeping up with
the growing demand for adult crossing guards thrOUghout the district considering the limited resources they
have to work with.
Staff concurs with the KID proposed solution and encourages the TVIJSD and KID committee to
explore available funding mechanisms. An interim solution that could be explored with the district is
the possibility of using KID committee members on a voluntary basis, to provide adult crossing guard
services at various locations throughout the City.
5
r: ~tra ~c\commissnhagenda~2002~0425\KI DS Citywide School lssues/ajp
The traffic issues identified by the KID committee are common m almost every school in the City of
Temecula and for that matter in Southern California. Commonly, the lack of on-site parking and on-site
circulation are the primary causes of traffic congestion around school sites. Secondly, there is the issue of
over-saturation of intersections and roadways during a short period of time caused by parents taking their
children to and from school. The final cause of traffic congestion is the total disregard for the roles of the
road by some parents when loading and unloading children.
Staff encourages the KID committee to take a pro-active role in helping to mitigate some of the congestion
issues they identified by encouraging parents and members to carpool when taking children to and from
school. This will help reduce vehicular volumes around school sites and improve parking. Also,
encourage parents to be more courteous and observe the rules of the road when picking-up and dropping-
offchildren. The elimination of double parking and illegal turning movements, along with the expression
of common courtesy can "go a long way" in reducing traffic congestion and providing for the safety of
children around school sites.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" - Letter from Kids In Danger (KID)
6
r: \ir a ffic\commissnXage nd a~2002',B425 \KI DS Citywid¢ School Issues/ajp
EXHIBIT "C"
MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS
Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software
02/20/03
Major Street: Butterfield Stage Road
Minor Street: Welton Way/Channel Street
Date of Analysis: 02/20/03
Name of Analyst:
Case Number:
Comments:
85th% Speed of Major Street: 50
WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMRY:
WARRANT 1 - Accident Experience
NOT SATISFIED - The accident warrant of 5 or more reportable accidents
of a correctable type is not met with 0 accidents over a 12 month period.
WARRANT 2 - Minimum Traffic Volumes
SATISFIED - The 100% vehicular warrant of 500 entering vehicles for
any 8 hours of the day is met with 10 hours meeting the warrant.
SATISFIED The 70% vehicular warrant of 350 entering vehicles for
any 8 hours of the day is met with 14 hours meeting the warrant.
WARRANT 3 - Vehicular & Pedestrian Traffic from Minor Road
SATISFIED The combined total of 200 vehicles and pedestrians
from the minor approach is met with 6 hours meeting the warrant.
Multi-Way Stop Warranting Software
02/20/03
100% 70% COMBINATION
START NB SB EB WB HOUR WARRANT WARRANT WARPJtNT
TIME TOT MET MET MET
0:00 7 22 3 3 35
1:00 3 9 4 2 18
2:00 7 6 1 2 16
3:00 7 7 3 1 18
4:00 19 10 26 18 73
5:00 50 25 38 34 147
6:00 78 218 48 48 392 *
7:00 178 361 113 91 743 * * *
8:00 167 382 127 120 796 * * *
9:00 116 214 97 78 505 * *
10:00 57 186 55 69 367 *
11:00 69 204 73 90 436 *
12:00 78 281 60 82 501 * *
13:00 76 249 90 102 517 * *
14:00 115 435 144 125 819 * * *
15:00 142 439 172 185 938 * * *
16:00 98 370 124 100 692 * * *
17:00 159 416 153 81 809 * * *
18:00 79 338 79 58 554 * *
19:00 59 256 45 31 391 *
20:00 22 184 27 21 254
21:00 32 128 18 10 188
22:00 15 65 13 7 100
23:00 4 44 4 5 57
ITEM NO. 4
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic
DATE: February 27, 2003
SUBJECT: Item 4
Promenade Chardonnay Hills - Multi-Way Stop Signs
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission continue the discussion of the Promenade Chardonnay Hills request
for Multi-Way Stop Signs.
BACKGROUND:
Staff is continuing to review the options and obtain concurrence of the Promenade Chardonnay Hills Home
Owners Association. Director Hughes met with the Home Owners Association on February 6th to receive
additional input from the Association and he intends to meet with their representative again to present the
City's suggestions before the February 27t~ Commission meeting. A verbal report will be delivered at the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
1
r :\tra ffie~commissn~agenda~2003\0227~coraenade ChaTdonnay follow up~ajp
ITEM NO. 5
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM: Ali Moghadam, P.E., Senior Engineer, Traffic
DATE: February 27, 2003
SUBJECT: Item 5
Temecula Citizen Corps Program
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission appoint one Commissioner to assist each Temecula Citizen Corps
area, and appoint the Public/Traffic Safety Commission Chairman to oversee all areas.
BACKGROUND:
This item has been placed on the agenda for discussion at the request of Chairman Connerton. This program
currently has over 30 registered volunteers and an ongoing recruitment effort. As discussed previously the
Commission plays a valuable roll as ambassadors to the Program. This discussion can help further provide
structure to that roll. A representative from the Police Department is available to provide additional
information, if necessary.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Temecula Citizens Corp.
December 10, 2002
/~City
Highways mis map ,~ r~de ~y U~ my o~ Te~a ~=~lc
~ Centedine p~u~ ~ ~ ~de ~ ~s ~
ITEM NO. 6
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City ManagedCity Council
FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: February 25, 2003
SUBJECT: Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of
Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of January, 2003.
MOACTRPT.FRM
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Monthly Activity Report
January ! February 2003
Prepared By: Amer Attar
Submitted by: William G. Hughes
Date: December February 25, 2003
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
1. First Street Extension - Environmental Mitigation
This project will create approximately 1.49 acres of wetlands along Murrieta Creek at First Street. It
includes construction of landscaping and irrigation improvements, and maintenance of said
improvements for a period of five (5) years in accordance with California Department of Fish and
Game and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit requirements. ACOE and RCFC are requesting
the relocation of the mitigation site to avoid conflict with Murrieta Creek Improvement Project. A
letter was sent from the City to ACOE for possible alternate mitigation site. The City received a
response from ACOE approving the relocation of mitigation site. Research is underway to acquire
an alternate site.
2. Community Theatre - Mercantile Seismic Retrofit
This project will create a community theatre at the old Mercantile building in downtown Temecula.
2H Construction began construction on Monday, September 16, 2002. Construct[on of the structural
braced frames are complete with foundation and sub floor upgrades underway.
3. Children's Museum
This project will construct a 7,500 square foot children's museum. The contract was awarded at the
September 17, 2002, City Council meeting to R.E. Fleming Construction. The contractor is
proceeding with completion of the new entry gazebo, porch railing and roof. The HVAC units have
been set and the contractor will be constructing screens for the visible units. Repair and retrofit of
the foundation system on the east side of the building wilt begin February 24. The City entered into a
separate contract with 2H Construction to complete the repairs to the foundation. The foundation
repair work is expected to be completed by the middle of May 2003.
4. Pechanga Parkway (Formerly Pala Road) Sound Wall Improvements
Under this project, sound walls will be designed and constructed on the southwest side of Pechanga
Parkway, from Rainbow Canyon Road to the Pechanga casino and on the northeast side along the
residences just north of Loma Linda Nine construction bids were received on February 4, 2003 and
the contract will be awarded at the February 25, 2003 City Council meeting. The apparent Iow
bidder is R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc. Construction will begin in March 2003. Work is being
coordinated with the Pechanga Parkway Phase il Improvements.
R:~VlonthlyActivity Repot t\C1P~2003klanua~.doc
PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS
None
PROJECTS IN DESIGN
1. Pechanga Parkway (Formerly Pala Road) Improvements - Phase II (SR 79 South to
Pechanga Road)
This project will widen Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) to its ultimate width from the
Pechanga Parkway Bridge to Pechanga mad. The City is currently working with Caltrans' Local
Assistance and City's Environmental Consultant to expedite the environmental approval process.
The Preliminary Environmental Document Classification (NEPA) of the project has been determined
to be an "Environmental Assessment" (EA). Required technical studies (involving Federal action)
will be included in the EA. The consultant submitted 95% drainage design plans to RCFC & WCD
for review the week of February 10, 2003. RCFC & WCD will respond to the latest submittal within
one month. The City received 90% street plans and specifications from DMJM-Harris and staff is
currently reviewing them along with the utility companies.
2. Rancho California Road Bridge Widening Over Murrieta Creek
This project will widen Rancho California Road Bridge over Murrieta Creek to provide four additional
traffic lanes. Staff is currently working with the design consultant to make final revisions to the
drawings and specifications. The proiect is scheduled to be advertised for bids by early March
2003.
3. Temecula Library
A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, will be designed and built on Pauba
Road, just west of Fire Station #84. This project will provide the community with library resoumes
and services. A separate pamel has been created for the library for bond purposes. The application
to the State was submitted on 6/13/02. The City's application was not among the approved ones.
The City will be resubmitting for the second round of funding approvals later this year. Construction
is delayed until Spring 2004, provided that the City receives funding. Utility services construction will
be coordinated with Pauba Road, Phase II Street Improvements.
4. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road)
This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate
width. The City has reviewed the 100% Design Plans submitted by the consultant. Specifications
are under review. Plans were sent to all utilities and utility issues are being addressed.
Environmental documents have been finalized by the City Planning Department and the public
comments period will begin next month. Work is being coordinated with the library project.
5. John Warner Road Assessment District - Hydrology Study
Under this project a drainage study will be done to compliment the improvement plans being done
by the property owners. Eventually the City will be the oversight agency for a property owners
2 R:'&I onthlyActiviVjRepoxl\ClP~2003XJanua~.doc
sponsored assessment district. An agreement amendment was approved by City Council on
October 8, 2002. ERSC submitted a revised hydrology study with storm drain alternatives on
10/30/02. The City chose a preferred alternative and directed ERSC to prepare the final Storm
Drain plans and the Engineer's Cost Estimate, Final Design Documents are expected in Mamh for
City's review.
6. Landscaping and Sidewalk On SR 79 South (Front Street to Pechanga Parkway)
The project consists of the design and construction of new sidewalk, landscaping, and irrigation
along State Route 79 South between Pechanga Parkway and Old Town Front Street Review of 1 st
plan submittal is complete. However, the project scope was modified. The modifications were
incorporated into 60% submittal, and the p~ans were re-submitted to Caltrans. Caltrans tentatively
approved the plans, and final revisions are being made. HOA has tentatively approved the planting
layout. 90% plans were submitted. The Civil plans are being revised and we are finalizing planting
plans.
7. Temecula Sports Complex
A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built at the corner of Pechanga Parkway and Deer Hollow
Way. The City Council approved the Conceptual Master Plan of the project and funding at the
January 14, 2003 meeting. RJM, the landscape amhitect, is to develop the construction drawings.
Existing facility maps for Pechanga Parkway and Deer Hollow Way have been received from utility
companies.
8. Bridge Barrier Rail Upgrade, Rainbow Canyon Road over Pechanga Creek/Del Rio Road
over Empire Creek
This project will replace the existing barrier rails of the Rainbow Canyon Bridge over Pechanga
Creek and the Del Rio Road Bridge over Empire Creek. Simon Wong Engineering (SWE) delivered
the 100% Plans and the Engineer's Cost Estimate in early October. The Specifications are
complete. The request for authorization for construction funding was sent to Caltrans on 1/14/03.
9. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site
A fire station will be built at the Wolf Creek Site. The Plans have been approved with exception of
grading plans. Waiting for parcel to be recorded and APN so an address can be assigned and utility
services finalized.
10. Pavement Management System Update
The project will establish a pavement management program that will provide an on-going schedule
of needed repairs and provide data that will be used to prepare budget estimates required to
complete the scheduled work. GIS links, AutoCAD review, and updates to MicroPAVER are included
in the total program. The consultant will submit the final pavement study to the City the week of
February 18, 2003.
11. Vail Ranch Park (Near Pauba Valley School) - Add Amenities
This project will add amenities, including play equipment to the recently annexed Vail Ranch Park.
RHA Landscape Architects/Planners Inc. is the design firm. First submittal was made on May 3rd.
The City reviewed these documents and returned them to the consultant for revisions. The City and
RHA met on 7/31/02 to discuss these comments and revisions are being made. Soil samples were
taken and results were provided to TCSD on 8/28/02. The City reviewed the grading plan and
3 R:'dvl onthlyActivityRepor t\C lPX2003~Ianuary.doc
transmitted comments back to the consultant. Once the grading plan is completed the design
documents will be finalized.
12. Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail
This project will build portions of the equestrian and bike trails along Murrieta Creek within City
limits. The City has received a federal grant of $1,214,000. Caltrans has given the City the
"Authorization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering." The City has determined the most qualified
consultant based on the interviews held on November 19, 2002. The City is currently in contract
negotiation with the chosen consultant.
13. State Route 79 South Medians
Under this project medians will be constructed on State Route 79 South within the City of Temecula
limits. A Request For Proposal (RFP) was sent out to consultants during the week of November 4,
2002. Responses have been received. Staff reviews of proposals have been completed.
Consultant contacted and negotiations are proceeding.
14. Guardrail Installation and Replacement On Rainbow Canyon Road
In this project, old guardrails will be replaced and new guardrails will be installed in needed locations
on Rainbow Canyon Road within the City of Temecula. The RFP for design has been prepared but
must be approved by Caltrans prior to publishing. The request for RFP approval and design
funding was submitted to Caltrans on 11/06/02. The City's Planning Department has prepared the
required environmental documents. A Field Review for the project with Caltrans was conducted on
February 19, 2003.
15. Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping
Under this project, 10,000 square feet remnant parcel west of Front Street, which was created by
the realignment of First Street, will be landscaped Project plans have been reviewed and are back to
Architect for corrections.
16. Diaz Road Realignment
Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road.
Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. City staff is currently designing the project. City
staff is currently designing the project. Street and landscaping design completion is scheduled for
May 2003. A signal at the intersection of Diaz and Rancho Way has been added and is currently
under design. Right of Way processing is anticipated to be completed by May of 2003.
17. Rancho California Road Median Modifications at Town Center
The project will include the closing of the hvo median openings on Rancho California Road in front
of the Town Center, while lengthening the left turn lanes at Ynez Road, Town Center Drive, and Via
Los Colinas to improve traffic circulation. The design is 100% complete. This project is being
combined with PW00-20, which includes a right turn lane eastbound on Rancho California Road at
Ynez Road. Combining the design of the two projects will be completed by late March with bidding
by late March 2003.
18. Rancho California Road Widening at Ynez Road (Add right turn lane to westbound lanes)
This project will add a right turn lane on westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road. Right of
4 R:'dVionthlyAcfi vityReporfiC IP~2003~Jan uary.doc
way acquisition at the northeast corner of Rancho California and Ynez is in process with Claim
Jumper Restaurant and Swedish American Corporation signing the acquisition agreements.
However, Swedish American Corporation is failing to respond to escrow instructions, and it appears
that we will have to acquire this property through eminent domain. This will delay the project.
Construction is anticipated to begin summer of 2003. Design is 90% complete. This project will be
combined with PW00-02.
19. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson
This project will widen Winchester road between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson Avenue. It will also
add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise
Circle. Project layout was plotted and discussed with Traffic and the Director of Public Works. In-
house design continues, with recent modifications to the design being implemented.
20. Rancho California Sports Park ADA Access and Shade Structure
This project entails the design and construction of ADA compliant concrete walkways to the
remaining ball fields, 3,4,5,7 & 8. It will also include the installation of two shade picnic/seating areas
adjacent to the snack bar building. Design work is 95% complete. Currently, the second plan
submittal is being revised. Specifications are being finalized and have been submitted for review.
Specification and plan revisions are complete. We anticipate advertising for construction in March
2003.
21. Bus Bench Upgrades
Under this project, bus benches and shade structures will be installed and existing ones will be
upgraded at various locations. Project research on locations of current bus stops, existing bus
bench/shade structures, bus bench/shade structure costs and RTA routes is complete. Bus
bench/shade structure design and location options were reviewed and a report with
recommendations is being prepared.
22. Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation - Phase II
This project will rehabilitate Jefferson Avenue from south of Overland Drive to Rancho California
Road. The rehabilitation will include pavement overlay, and road and driveway reconstruction. Staff
is in the process of hiring a surveying and a soils firm to provide topographic maps and pavement
analysis for this project. Once the consultant completes the maps, staff will begin the design.
23. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - FY 2002/2003
Staff is reviewing the Pavement Management Report prepared by Berryman & Henigar to ascertain
which street sections should be repaired with the available budget for this project. It was
recommended, based on that report to repair westbound Rancho California Road between
Margarita Road and Meadows Parkway. Capital Projects is proceeding with preparing plans and
specifications for that section of road.
5 R:'xMonthlyActivityRepor t~C1PX2003XJanuary.d~c
PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE
1. 1-15! SR 79 South Interchange - Project Study Report (PSR)
This project will modify the 1-15/SR 79 South Interchange to accommodate projected future traffic.
The City received the final Value Engineering Analysis Report from Caltrans on May 8, 2002. All the
proposed alignments presented by the value analysis team were rejected. The City's consultant
provided an alignment modification with supporting traffic data to Caltrans on 10/02/02. Caltrans
provided comments and the consultant addressed those comments and sent a response to
Caltrans. Caltrans approved the proposed modified alternative #5. However, they proposed an
interim solution that includes the construction of a roundabout. The City met with Caltrans on
February 6, 2003 to discuss this new concept. We are evaluating this new concept and we will be
responding to Caltrans shortly.
2. French Valley Parkway Overcrossing and Interchange, Project Report (PR), Plans
Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Preparation
This project will construct an interchange between Winchester Road Interchange and the 1-15/~-215
split. The City's consultant will be providing the City a Project Report (PR), and Environmental
Documents (ED) for this first phase of the design process. This project will include the southbound
off-ramp to Jefferson Avenue. On January 14, 2002, the City Council approved the design contract
with Moffatt & Nichol Engineers. Monthly Project Design Team meetings will be starting on February
26, 2003.
3. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road
This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly
to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening
of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland
Drive across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road. PDC has completed the alignment study and staff has
reviewed copies of the preliminary plans. Staff has reviewed design costs for next year's fiscal
funding. No funding until FY04-05.
4. Alignment Study for Murrieta Creek Bridge Between Winchester Road and Temecula City
Limits and Diaz Road Extension
This study will determine the alignment and location of the Murrieta Creek crossing between
Winchester Road and the northern City Limits. In addition, the study will be combined with the Diaz
Road Extension alignment study and design. Coordination with the City of Murrieta, Riverside
County Flood Control and Army Corps of Engineers is necessary. The Consultant and Staff met
with Riverside County Flood Control to discuss possible alignments. The consultant is currently
awaiting data from Riverside County Flood Control in order to complete the work on the first draft of
the alignment study. Staff was informed this data could take up to a year to receive (from May
2002).
6 R:'dVlonthlyActivityRepor t\C IP~2003XJanuaxy.doc
PROJECTS THAT ARE SUSPENDED OR ON-HOLD
1. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Widening at 1-15
This is Phase II of the Southbound Auxiliary Lane project at the southbound exit romp for
Winchester Road. This project will widen the 1-15 southbound exit-ramp at the Santa Gertrudis
Creek Bridge to provide an additional lane on the exit ramp just north of Winchester Road. Staff is
revisiting the merits of this proiect in light of the Project Study Report for French Valley Parkway
Interchange. The study shows that this bridge may have to be removed in the future to
accommodate the new Interchange. This project is suspended indefinitely.
2. Margarita Road/Winchester Road Intersection Improvements
Project is on hold. Under this project, an additional left turn from eastbound Winchester to
northbound Margarita will be added in order to accommodate increasing troffic volumes. Design is
50% complete. A developer will be doing this project.
3. Pujol Street Sidewalk Improvements - Phase II
Project is on hold. This project will complete the knuckle at the intersection of Sixth Street and
Felix Valdez. The developer of a nearby property may be designing and constructing this project.
4. School Site ADA Improvements
Project has been removed from this year's ClP. Design and construct ADA concrete walkways
and hand railing to athletic facilities at Temecula Middle School, James L. Day Middle School and
Margarita Middle School. TCSD re-allocated the funds.
5. City Hall Parking Lot Modifications
Project is on-hold. Funding has been postponed until FY 2004/2005. Under this project, a
security fence will be installed between the existing maintenance facility and the western side of City
Hall to secure the parking lot west of the main building. The design of a security fence between the
existing maintenance facility and the western side of City Hall will be performed in-house. A scoping
meeting was held on November 12, 2001. Research on existing base maps for the proposed area
and as-builts for the existing security fence near the maintenance facility is complete. Design and
review of the proposed layout is complete. The project is currently on hold waiting for further
direction
7 R:hMonthlyActivityRepoffiC h~2003~January.doc
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: ~q/) Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: February 5, 2003
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - January, 2003
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house
personnel for the month of January, 2003:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 125
B. Total signs installed 18
C. Total signs repaired 142
I1. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 22
III. ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs 2,741
B. Total Tons 64
IV. CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned 212
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement - 0 -
VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations 49
B. Total S.F. 2,762
VII. STENCILING
A. 290 New and repainted legends
B. 100 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 63 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree
trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 46
service order requests for the month of December, 2002.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 48 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special
events and response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of January, 2003 was
$ 44,035.70 compared to ~ 85,532.50 for the month of December, 2002.
Account No. 5402 $ 37,435.70
Account No. 5401 $ 4,500.00
Account No. 999-5402 $ 2,100.00
cc: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer (ClP/Traffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer (Land Development)
R:\MAINTAIN\MOACTR PT~IU LY 2002- JUNE 2003~JANUARY 03.DOC
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF JANUARY, 2003
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
01/02/03 McCABE AT CAMINO ALACON REMOVED 14 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 44515 BEDFORD COURT REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 15 FWY AT 79 SO. REMOVED 184 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 MARGARITA PARK (3 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 37 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 MARGARITA AT PASEO BRILLANTE REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REMOVED 23 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 MARGARITA AT SOLANA REMOVED 14 $.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 29604 MARGARITA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 MARGARITA AT STONEWOOD REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 MARGARITA AT OVERLAND REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 MARGARITA AT SOLANA REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/06/03 MARGARITA AT MORAGA REMOVED 91 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/07/03 McCABE AT CAM1NO ALAGON REMOVED 36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/07/03 MEADOWS PARKWAY AT PAUBA REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/08/03 MORAGA REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/08/03 MARGARITA AT SANTA GEP,.TRUDIS REMOVED 1,207 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/0903 27326 JEFFERSON REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/09/03 27314 JEFFERSON REMOVED 18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/09/03 27536 YNEZ REMOVED 214 S.F. OF GRAFFIT1
01/09/03 28100 JEFFERSON REMOVED 3 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/09/03 1-15 FWY AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 48 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/09/03 42210 REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/09/03 40435 WINCHESTER REMOVED 9 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/13/03 WINCHESTER AT SANTA GERTRUDIS REMOVED 130 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/13/03 WINCHESTER AT JEFFERSON REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/14/03 39610 RUSTIC GLEN REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/14/03 BIKE TRAIL AT CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL REMOVED 32 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
01/14/03 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT RUSTIC GLEN REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/14/03 26730 YNEZ COURT REMOVED 180 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/17/03 SPORTS PARK REMOVED 80 S.F, OF GRAFFITI
01/21/03 RANCHO VISTA AT ARGO REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/22/03 LONG CANYON CREEK PARK REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/22/03 42101 MORAGA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF G1LAFFITI
01/23/03 29766 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 34 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/23/03 29740 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 21 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/24/03 29566 PUJOL (6 LOCATIONS) REMOVED 58 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/24/03 TROTSDALE REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/27/03 28816 PUJOL REMOVED 96 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/27/03 YNEZ AT WINCHESTER 1EEMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/27/03 41005 WINCHESTER REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
01/28/03 TEMECULA LANE AT CANTERFIELD REMOVED 56 S.F. OF GRAFFIT!
01/30/03 OIVERLAND AT PROMENADE WAY REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
REMOVED S.F. OF GRAFFITI
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 2~762
TOTAL LOCATIONS 49
ITEM NO. 7
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
f
APPROVAL
ClTY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jim Domenoe, Chief of Polic~jJ~/J
DATE: January 25, 2003
SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report
The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring
during January 2003. The Police Department responded to 27 "priority one" calls for service during
the month of January, with an average response time of approximately 5.3 minutes. A total of 3,733
calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month.
During January, the Temecula Police Department's Town Center Storefront served a total of 166
customers. Forty-seven sets of fingerprints were taken, 14 people filed police reports and five
people had citations signed off. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of
special events, neighborhood watch and community-oriented programs during the month. He also
coordinated requests for patrol ride-alongs. Additionally, he continued to provide residential and
business security surveys/visits and past crime follow-up. Officer Fanene also continued to process
City Planning Department submissions of site plans/conditions.
The POP Teams continued their Warrant Apprehension Program during January, which resulted in
five felony and four misdemeanor warrant arrests. They also issued 25 citations for various traffic
violations. POP Teams also continued with the homeless persons program, with the goal of
assisting homeless in finding services and aid to help them.
The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP teams and a location to assist the public
with police services. This has greatly increased their accessibility and their ability to serve the Old
Town area. During January, the Old Town Storefront served 276 customers. Twenty-six sets of
fingerprints were taken, 16 reports were written, and 14 citations were signed off,
The traffic team reported that during the month of January there were 684 citations issued for
hazardous violations, 189 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 106 parking
citations were issued. During the month there were 20 injury traffic collisions, 72 non-injury
collisions were reported and 31 drivers were arrested for DUI. The Neighborhood Enforcement
Team (NET) program resulted in 170 citations being issued. This program addresses traffic
concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated motor officer. The SLAP program (Stop
Light Abuse Program) resulted in 55 citations being issued.
Monthly Departmental Report - Police Department 1
During the month of January, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of
86 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the
month, calls and on-sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on four felony and six
misdemeanor cases. Officers McEIvain and Rupe continued to provide training to security staff
during the month. The mall officers continued to work on vehicle theft and burglary programs. No
vehicle thefts, and only one vehicle burglary occurred during the month of January.
Our five school resoume officers have remained active during January. The school resource
officers conducted many counseling sessions with students. A total of 36 investigations/reports
were conducted/written by the school resource officers during January. The school resoume
officers also made four arrests for various misdemeanor crimes during January. These crimes
ranged from possession of marijuana to burglary to drunk in public.
The JOLT program (Juvenile Offender Law Enfomement Program) continues to be a success in part
through its Youth Court program. Officer Michelle Medeiros conducted the 104th Youth Court
session. The JOLT officer assisted at other schools when needed and conducted follow-ups with
parents of juveniles in the JOLT program. During January, Officer Medeiros made two
misdemeanor arrests of juveniles for being drunk in public. Officer Medeiros also worked with "at
risk" juveniles throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents.
She assisted the Riverside County District Attorney's Office and Probation Department by providing
training during home visits with incorrigible/at risk juveniles during the month of January.
During the month of January, the Special Enforcement Team (SET Team) of Officers Jon Wade and
Michelle Larson made seven misdemeanor and five felony arrests, primarily for namotics violations.
This team continues to work street level narcotics and specialty patrol within the city on a proactive
basis, recovering quantities of methamphetamine and marijuana during the month.
Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the Temecula Police Department's
staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer Bob Ridley and assistant coordinator
Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 502 hours of service in January.
Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance and
telephone answering duties.
Community Action Patrol (CAP) Program volunteers have begun their activities, patrolling the city for
graffiti, conducting vacation residential checks and assisting patrol with special logistical needs and
special events. Other duties these volunteers will attend to are business checks and abandoned
vehicles and traffic control. The goal of the program is high visibility, which prevents crime from
occurring. CAP Team members contributed 269 hours of service to the community during the
month of January.
The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources
available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with
patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention and a variety of special functions. Reserve police
officers worked a total of 190 hours specifically on patrol in Temecula during January.
Monthly Departmental Report- Police Department 2