HomeMy WebLinkAbout040903 PC Agenda In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate In this meeting,
please contact the office of the City'Clerk (909) 694-6~.. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the
City to make mssonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
ADJOURNED TO MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
APRIL 9, 2003 - 6:00 P,M,
Next In Order:
Resolution: No. 2003-016
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute: Commissioner Guerriero
Roll Call: Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chiniaeff
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item no~t on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary prior' to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. Therewill be no discussion of these Items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific Items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
1 Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
· 1,1 Approve the Agenda of April 9, 2003
R:~PLANCOMMV~gendas~2OO3~O4-O9-O3,doc
1
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of March 19, 2003
3 Director's Hearin.q Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3:1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for March, 2003
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projecta in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or aomeone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Continued from March 19, 2003
4 Planninq Application No. PA02-0426 To establish a siqn pro.qram for Etco Plaza, a shoppin.q
center consistinq of two buildin.qs located at 27270 Madison Avenue, Matthew Harris,
Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02-0426, TO ESTABLISH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE
ETCO PLAZA DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED AT
THE TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE
ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS 910-272-
005 & 006.
5 Plannino A~Diication No. PA02-0340 To establish a Comprehensive Land Use Plan'in
association with a future retail commercial shoppin.q center located on the southeast and
southwest corners of Pechanaa Parkwav and State Hiahwav 79 South, Matthew Harris,
Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION: · ·
5.1 RequeSting a continuance to April 23, 2003
R:'~PLANCOM M~Agendas~2003~04-09-O3.do~
2
New Items
6 Plannin.q Application No. PA02-0334 To desi.qn, construct, and operate a 27,706 square foot
two-story office buildin.q located on Jefferson Avenue and north of Via Montezuma, Rick
Rush. Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0334 pursuant to
Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
· 6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02-0334, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 27,706 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE
BUILDING ON 1.67 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED
ON JEFFERSON AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-400-037
7 Plannin.q Application No. PA02-0652 A Vestinq Tentative Parcel Map located on the south
side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Rancho California
Road / Moraqa Intersection, Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-
0652 (Vesting Tentative Parcel Map) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California
Environmental Quality Act;
7.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0652, AN
EIGHT LOT VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY
LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST
OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD
INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290-012, 013,014.
R:~PLANC OM M~gendas~003~04-09-03.doc
3
8 PlanninR Application No. PA02-0620 To construct, establish and operate an 8,100 square
foot multi-tenant retail buildinq on 1.01 acres located within the Bel Villa(~io shoooin(~ center.
west of Mar.qarita Road, 470 linear feet south of the Mall Access Road and North General
Keamey Road intersection, Rolfe Pmisendanz
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-
0620 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental
Quality Act;
8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OFTHE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA02,0620, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-
TENANT RETAIL BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY
LOCATED WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET
SOUTH OF THE MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD INTERSECTION AND ALSO
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-090-063, 071,072
AND 078.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: April 23, 2003 - Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
R:\p LANCOM Ivl~Agendas',2003~04-09-03.doc
4
ITEM #2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 19, 2003
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:01 P.M.,
on Wednesday, March 19, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Chairman Chiniaeff.
Chairman Chiniaeff welcomed Minute Clerk Norma Childs and Planning Technician Sid
Pena.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio,
and Chairman Chiniaeff.
Absent: None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
I ARenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of March 19, 2003
It was noted by Chairman Chiniaeff that Item No .5 (Comprehensive Land Use Plan
in association with a future retail commercial shopping center located on the
southeast and southwest corners of Pechanga Parkway and State Highway 79
South) would be continued to the April 9, 2003 Planning Commission Meeting.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of January 29, 2003;
2.2 Approve the minutes of February 5, 2003;
2.3 Approve the minutes of February 19, 2003.
R: PlanComm/minutes/031903 1
3 Director's Hearinq Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for February, 2003.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-
3. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
4 Conditional Use Permit Requirements for Businesses Sellinq Alcoholic Beveraqes -
Dave Ho,qanl Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 File and receive.
Principal Planner Hogan reviewed the staff report (of record), highlighting the City's
current Development Code requirements and the recommended changes.
In response to the Commissioners, Principal Planner Hogan noted the following:
· That staff would concur with Commissioner Telesio's suggestions for staff to
create local factors/impacts/problems in determining the need for a Conditional
Use Permit (CUP);
· That a Specialty/Discount Store would be characterized as a World
Market/Trader Joe's;
· That the Discount Store category (Costco) would be currently defined in the
Development Code but that the Specialty Market category is not.
Commissioner Mathewson noted that the wine tasting/sales category should be
restricted to ensure that sales are solely limited to wine tasting.
Commissioner Mathewson relayed his concurrence with staff's recommendation
requesting that additional justification be provided with regard to the uses that would no
longer require a CUP.
With regard to the Convenience Store/Mini Mart and Liquor Store categories,
Commissioner Telesio expressed his preference to regulate on an enforcement basis
with proper justification versus on a general regulation basis.
In response to Commissioner Mathewson's comment, Principal Planner Hogan advised
that from staff's perspective the need for a CUP would be easier regulated through the
use versus the success/quality of the business but that staff could analyze information
such as percentage of total sales and determining which percentage is alcohol related.
R: P~anCornmJminutesJO31903 2
Because checks and balances are in place through the CUP process, Chairman
Chiniaeff voiced his opinion for no change and concurred with Commissioner Telesio's
comment relative to regulation.
Speaking in support of staff's recommendation as it relates to differentiation among the
various categories, Commissioner OIhasso referenced existing checks and balances
through the CUP.
Commissioner Guerriero questioned the number of Convenience Stores/Mini
Marts/Liquor Stores and gas stations necessary in the City that sell alcohol.
Considering the existing procedures in place, Commissioner Telesio spoke in support of
no change.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
5 Planninq Application No. PA02-0340 To establish a Comprehensive Land Use Plan
in association with a future retail commemial shoppinq center located on the
southeast and southwest corners of Pechanqa Parkway and State Highway 79 South
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No.
PA02-0340 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California
Environmental Quality Act;
5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 02-0340, A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN TO
ESTABLISH GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA FOR THE FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT OF A RETAIL/COMMERCIAL SHOPPING
COMPLEX ON A 14.3 ACRE SITE. THE SITE IS GENERALLY
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST
CORNERS OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND PECHANGA
PARKWAY ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS.
961-010-001,004 &005.
Planning Director Ubnoske advised that staff would recommend that this public hearing
be continued to the meeting of April 9, 2003. Having met with the applicant and staff,
Commissioner Telesio noted that the project is progressing and should be ready for the
Commission's review by April 9, 2003.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to continue the item to the meeting of
April 9, 2003.
R: PlanComm/minutes/031903 3
6 Planning Application No. PA03-017 An application for a seasonal strawberry stand
located at 40240 Winchester Road,
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING
DIRECTOR'S DECISION TO DENY PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
03-017, A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A
TEMPORARY FRESH FRUIT STAND LOCATED ON THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND WINCHESTER
ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. APN 920-100-013
Planning Technician Pena referenced the staff report (as per agenda material), noting
that the applicant was not in attendance; that the proposed site would solely be for
selling and not for growing purposes; that the applicant was desirous of attaining access
off Winchester Road to ensure marketability of his business; and that the existing
driveway has not been properly designed for public use and does not meet Caltrans
design standards.
There being no public input, the public hearing was closed.
Chairman Chiniaeff voiced no objection to permitting access off Nicolas Road.
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve staff recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
7 Planninq Application No. PA02-0426 to establish a sign proqram for Etco Plaza, a
shoppinq center consistinq of two buildinqs located at 27270 Madison Avenue
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Continue this item for Modification/Revisions.
Associate Planner Harris reviewed the staff report (of record), highlighting the sign
standards as per the Development Code and noting that the applicant will be deviating
from these standards. Mr. Harris referenced staff's recommendation to revise the sign
program whereby all the non-conforming sign regulations are modified to comply with all
existing applicable sign standards within the Development Code; to limit Wall Mounted
Signage to the east and west sides of the buildings on Madison Avenue and freeway
side; to prohibit signage on the north and south ends of the two buildings, noting there
would be sufficient visibility on the east and west sides; and to continue the item for
further review.
R: PtanComm/minutes/031903 4
Staff clarified that it would be within the Planning Commission's purview to amend the
Sign Standards if determined it would enhance the development.
Having worked with the Planning Department with regard to the sign program, Mr. Afshin
Etebar, applicant, 540 Westminster Mall, Westminster, described the proposed sign
program, noting the following:
Freestandinq Multi-Tenant Identification Si,qns
· That the intent of the proposed sign program would be to enhance the freeway
side of the building and that possibly a variation of the sign standards be
considered;
· That commercial users/office users (ground floor) would prefer signage on the
building facing the freeway as well as Madison Avenue;
· That, in his opinion, the ordinance does not reflect clear guidelines with regard to
mixed-use buildings;
· That with regard to the Freestanding Signs standards, he would not view his
project as a shopping center which has a standard of one sign per 300 lineal feet
of street frontage per shopping center (applicant proposing two signs per 458
lineal feet of street frontage);
· That because of the project location within the master planned area, there would
be no flexibility as to sign location because of landscaping;
· That he would be willing to work with staff with regard to architectural elements of
the Freestanding Multi-Tenant Identification Signs (2) proposed;
· That address standards for the Freestanding Signs could be accommodated.
Wall Mounted Si,qns
· That five primary signs are being proposed versus four as was indicated in the
staff report;
· That there will be two primary tenants (1st & 2nd floor.); that currently there is no
tenant for the third floor of the first building;
· That the second building currently has one tenant for the first floor;
· That at maximum occupancy, he would propose to locate three signs on the
freeway side and three signs on the Madison Avenue side;
· That some tenants may request doubled-lined signs; that the articulation of the
proposed buildings has limited signage area; therefore, some flexibility would be
requested.
R: PlanComrrdminutes/031903 5
Secondary Tenant Signs
· That the color scheme of the secondary signs will be matching the primary signs;
· That in his opinion, the proposed sign program would meet the requirements of
Development Code 17.28.240.
In response to the Commissioners, Mr. Eteban noted the following:
· That each building would accommodate four tenants on the first floor, four
tenants on the second floor, and two tenants on the third floor.
For the Planning Commissioners, Assistant City Attorney Curley, clarified that, as per
case law, there are parameters with regard to corporate Iogos, noting that the City may
prohibit Iogos; that it may control the size of them; but that it may not change/alter a
corporate logo.
Mr. James P. Bras, 1749 E. 28th Street Signal Hill, representing the applicant, Sign
Methods, Inc., concurred with Assistant Attorney Curley's comment regarding corporate
Iogos.
Commissioner Guerriero commended the applicant on the proposed sign program and
voiced a willingness to be flexible.
Commending the applicant on the architectural elements of the project, Commissioner
Mathewson relayed his desire for less signage to limit the possibility of detracting from
these elements; expressed concern with regard to the size of the letters and number of
signs of each building; and noted no concern with the number of lines (single or double);
Commending the applicant as well on the design of the project, Commissioner Telesio
clarified his understanding of the sign request (one sign per building on the west side
[freeway side] and one sign per building on the east side [Madison Avenue] per major
tenant). In closing, Mr. Telesio relayed his preference to not utilize corporate Iogos.
To eliminate staff/applicant confusion as it relates to corporate Iogos, Commissioner
Olhasso suggested that staff and the applicant work together; recommended staff
flexibility to ensure quality tenants; and voiced no concern with changing the font as long
as there be adherence to the color scheme.
Chairman Chiniaeff expressed concern with the proposed number of signs; stated that in
his opinion, signage would not be necessary on the ends of the buildings on the east
and west sides for the major tenants considering there will be signage for the major
tenants on the freeway side (west side); and voiced no objection to the monument sign.
Additional Commission discussion and clarification ensued as to Iogos and maximum
number of signs per building per primary, secondary, and ground tenants with the
following comments:
R: PlanComm/minutes/031903 6
· Commissioner Mathewson emphasized his desire to permit one primary tenant
identified per building with one sign per elevation (two signs maximum);
· Commissioner Guerriero voiced no objection to placing a secondary sign on the
north and south sides but expressed concern with the placement of a secondary
sign on the east and west sides.
By way of an exhibit, the Commission clarified its recommendation with the applicant
voicing no objection as follows:
· One primary sign per building on the east and west elevations (freeway and
Madison Avenue sides);
· One secondary sign for another major tenant on the second floor on either the
north or south ends of the buildings. If there were four tenants on the second
floor, no signage would be permitted on the north and south ends;
· Two monument signs on the east elevation;
· Provide a revised site plan to reflect the Planning Commission sign
recommendation;
· That no Iogos be granted.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to continue this matter to the Planning
Commission Meeting of April 9, 2003. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Mathewson and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
8 Planninq Application No. PA02-0689 An Extension of Time for Planninq Application
No. PA00-0276 a Development Plan to desiqn and construct a 15,833 square foot
office buildinq on a .64-acre lot located at the southwest knuckle of Enterprise Circle
North (the empty buildinR pad north of 41582 Enterprise Circle North), Rick Rush,
Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0689 pursuant
to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
8.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-014
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0689 (THE FIRST ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME) FOR
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0276 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 15,883 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE
BUILDING (KEETON BUILDING), ON A .64 ACRE LOT LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHWEST KNUCKLE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE
NORTH, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-282-013
R: PlanComm/rninutes/031903 7
Associate Planner Rush reviewed the staff report (of record), advising that the
applicant's representative was in attendance and voicing no opposition to the six added
conditions of approval as well as one amended condition of approval (added condition
nos. 4d, 11,70, 71, 72, and 73 and the amended condition no. 18).
At this time, the Chairman opened the public hearing.
Mr. Larry R. Markham, 41635 Enterprise Cimle North, representing the applicant,
reiterated concurrence with the revised conditions of approval, including the amended
condition.
At this time the public hearing was closed.
.MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation with the
added six conditions of approval, including the one amended conditions (see page 7).
Commissioner Oihasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
9 Planninq Application No. PA03-0109 To amend the Development Code to do the
followinq: define what a major and minor modification to a development plan is,
clarify the application process for proiects requirinq both a development plan and
conditional use permit, authorize the adoption by reference of complicated Planned
Development Overlay projects, create standards and procedures for Planned
Residential Developments, clarify confusion concerninq the approval of si.qn
proqrams as well as the allowable types, and duration of used for ambient balloons,
update the approval authority table in Chapter 17.03 to conform to the other
chanqes, Dave Ho(lan, Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-015
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURES FOR MODIFYING
APPROVED PERMITS, TO CREATE PROVISIONS TO ALLOW
FOR PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, TO MAKE
OTHER MINOR CHANGES AND PROVIDE FOR THE
READOPTION OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NOS. 5
AND 6" (PLANNING APPLICATION 03-0109)
Principal Planner Hogan clarified the staff report (as per agenda material), highlighting
the following:
R: planComnVminutes/031903 8
· CUP noticing requirements increased from 300' to 600';
· Creation of minor and major modifications for Development Plans and CUPs;
new fee schedule will be developed reviewing the various elements of each
modification;
· That minor and major modifications be administratively approved unless there
were substantial changes which would require Planning Commission's approval;
· Creation of a Planned Residential Development Element - varying zone
standards on sites;
,, Planned Development Overlays (PDO) - adopted by specific reference;
· With regard to the provided information, it was the Planning Commission's
recommendation to change the verbiage of the first bullet under Minor
Modification as follows: an increase of less than 10% of the building
footprint; and to request that all Major Modifications be forwarded to the
Planning Commission for review.
With regard to Section 2 A.2 (CUP for a Development Plan for a new building less than
10,000 square feet), Chairman Chiniaeff relayed his opposition with this section if it were
to relate to the Liquor Store category with Principal Planner Hogan advising that this
would not be a change of the current procedure and with Planning Director Ubnoske
noting that the Planning Commission would review the need for public necessity or
convenience.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staff recommendation as
amended:
· Minor Modifications - an increase of less than 10% of the building footprint;
· Major Modifications - to be forwarded for Planning Commission review.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
A. For Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that Code
Enforcement is addressing the storage of sofas in the parking lot on Madison Avenue.
B. Assistant Attorney Curley provided clarification with regard to Conflict of Interest
as it relates to the Commissioners' voting abilities.
C. Referencing the Commissioners' Handbook, Commissioner Telesio commented
on ExParte communications.
R: PlanComm/minutes/031903 9
D. For Commissioner Telesio, Assistant City Attorney Curley provided clarification
with regard to the Building and Safety Code pertaining to all-weather (asphalt) road
requirements.
E. Commissioner Mathewson apprised staff of a flooding issue at General Kearney
Road at James L. Day Middle School. Commissioner Mathewson also expressed
concern with a PVC and vinyl sign functioning as a monument sign at La Masters
Building Advantage Rent-a-Car.
F. For Chairman Chiniaeff, Planning Director Ubnoske advised that staff is working
on resolving the car lot issue on Ynez Road (located on the North Plaza property).
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
A. Because of the lack of quorum for the regularly scheduled meeting for April 2,
2003, it was the consensus of the members to reschedule the April Planning
Commission meeting to April 9, 2003 and April 23, 2003.
B. Planning Department reminded the Commissioners of the Form 700 deadline.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:00 P.M. Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next adiourned
re(~ular meetin_q to be held on Wednesday, April 9, 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the City
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Dennis W. Chiniaeff, Debbie Ubnoske,
Chairman Director of Planning
R: PtanComm/minutes/031903 10
ITEM #3
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
DATE: April 9, 2003
SUBJECT: Director's Hearing Case Update
Planning Director's Agenda items for March 2003
March 20, 2003 PA02-0214 A Development Plan application for the Hope Approved
installation of a 3,600 square foot modular Lutheran
office building located at the rear of the Church
existing Hope Lutheran Church property at
29385 Rancho California Road
March 20, 2003 PA02-0573 A request to offer off-sale beer and wine at Barghausen Approved
the Arco AM/PM gas station convenience Consulting
~ market currentlyunderconstruction located Engineering
at 44987 Old Town Front Street
Attachments:
1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2
P:\PLA N N ING\DIR H EA R'~vl EM O\2003'flVl arch 2003.memo.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
ACTION AGENDAS
p:~PLAN N IN G\D1RH EA R~vl EM O\2003~V! arch 2003.memo.doc
2
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
March 20, 2003 1:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Dave Hogan, Principal Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a
white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
Item No. 1:
Case No: PA02-0573
Applicant: Barghausen Consulting Engineering
Location: Arco AM/PM at 44987 Old Town Front Street
Proposal: A request to offer off-sale beer and wine at the Arco AM/PM gas
station convenience market currently under construction.
Envirenmental Action: Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Section 15301 (Existing
Facilities}
Case Planner: Saied Naaseh
ACTION: APPROVED
Item No. 2:
Case No: PA02-0214 (Development Plan)
Applicant: Francine Hettenbach, Hope Lutheran Church
Location: 29385 Rancho California Road
Proposal: A Development Plan application for the installation of a 3,600 square
foot modular office building located at the rear of the existing Hope
Lutheran Church property at 29385 Rancho California Road.
EnvironmentalAction: This project is exempt from CEQA review due to Class 32
Categorical Exemption 15332 (In-Fill Development)
Case Planner: Rick Rush, Associate Planner
ACTION: APPROVED
P:kPLANNING\DIRHEAR\Agendas\2003\03-20-03 ACTION AGENDA.doc
ITEM #4
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 9, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0426 (Sign Program)
Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
1. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0426, TO ESTABLISH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE ETCO PLAZA
DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF
SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS 910-272-005 & 006.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Etco Investments LLC
PROPOSAL: To establish a sign program for Etco Plaza, a shopping center
consisting of two buildings.
LOCATION: 27270 Madison Avenue
EXISTING ZONING: Service Commercial (SC)
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Service Commercial (SC)
South: Service Commercial (SC)
East: Service Commercial (SC)
West: Service Commercial (SC)
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Service Commercial (SC)
EXISTING LAND USE: Building Under Construction
SURROUNDING LAND
USES: North: Commercial
South: Commercial
East: Interstate 15
West: Vacant
BACKGROUND
This application was continued from the Mamh 19, 2003 Planning Commission meeting after the
Commission requested several modifications to the allowed number and locations of proposed signs
onsite. The following is a summary of the sign program modifications requested by the Commission:
· Allow one primary tenant sign on the east and west side of each building.
· With regard to second-story signs, allow one secondary tenant sign on the north and south
side of each building only if them is a single second-story tenant. If more than one second-
story tenant, no signs am allowed.
· With regard to ground floor signs, allow one secondary tenant sign on the east and west
side of each building for each of the four individual tenants. Also allow one secondarytenant
sign on the east and west side of each building if a tenant occupies two tenant spaces or
more.
· Do not allow any logo signs on the buildings.
· Allow the two freestanding signs along the Madison Avenue frontage as proposed.
Subsequent to the March 19t~ meeting, the applicant modified the sign program text, site plan and
building elevations as requested by the Commission. Staff provides a description and analysis of the
modifications below.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS
Primary Tenant Signs
As requested, the applicant has modified the text of the sign program, site plan and building
elevations to allow a maximum of one primary tenant sign on both the east and west elevations of
each building. With regard to the location of the signs, the applicant is requesting three different
location options on both the east and west building elevations. However, staff believes the faGade
area below the arched roof elements on each of these elevations represents the most appropriate
location for the signs based on the buildings architectural features. Therefore, staff recommends
that the two permitted primary tenant signs be limited to these locations on each building and that
the sign program be modified accordingly. This has been made a recommended condition of
approval.
Conclusion: The revised sign program conforms to Planning Commission direction.
Alternate location options should be rejected for architectural reasons.
Second Floor Signs
The Commission determined that one secondary tenant size sign can be allowed on the north and
south side of each building provided there is only one tenant on the second floor of each building. If
there is more than one second-story tenant, no second-story signs would be permitted. However,
the applicant's revised sign program proposes for one secondary tenant sign to be located on the
second story of both the east and west elevations of each building to identify a second-story tenant
that occupies at least 50% of the second floor space. The Planning Commission direction was that a
second floor tenant occupies 100% of the floor in order to be eligible for a secondary tenant sign.
Again, the applicant has requested optional sign locations for the signs. Staff believes the allowance
for second-story signs on the east and west sides of the building will result in an excessive amount
of signage on these elevations and serve to diminish the building architecture. Therefore, staff
R:~D P~20(X~00-0448 Etco\Siga Program Staff Report 2.d~c
2
recommends that the second-story signage provisions outlined by the Planning Commission be
maintained and that the sign program be revised accordingly. This has been made a recommended
condition of approval.
Conclusion: The revised sign program is inconsistent with the Planning Commission
direction. Additional signage on the east and west building elevations should
be rejected for architectural reasons.
Ground Floor Signs
As requested, the applicant has revised the sign program to allow for one secondary tenant sign on
the ground floor of the east and west building elevations of each building. Staff concum with the
proposed location of these signs.
If a single tenant occupies two or more ground floor tenant spaces the Commission has determined
that the tenant should also be limited to one secondary tenant sign on the ground floor of the east
and west building elevations of each building. However, the applicant's revised sign program allows
these tenants to have one secondary tenant sign on the second floor of the east and west elevations
of each building. Staff again believes that allowing another sign on the second story of these
elevations would serve to detract from the building architecture. Therefore, staff recommends that
the signs be located on the ground floor as directed by the Commission. This has been made a
recommended condition of approval.
Conclusion: The revised sign program is inconsistent with Planning Commission direction.
Logo Signs
The Planning Commission determined that no logo sign should be allowed on the building.
However, the applicant's revised sign program continues to permit logo signs. Staff recommends
that the sign program be modified to reflect the Commissions decision. This has been made a
recommended condition of approval.
Conclusion: The revised sign program is inconsistent with Planning Commission direction.
Monument Signs
The Commission determined that the two proposed freestanding monument signs along the
Madison Avenue frontage were appropriate as proposed. However, the applicant's revised sign
program shows the signs in modified locations adjacent to the two site driveways. Staff has no
objection to the revised sign locations provided the signs comply with sight visibility requirements.
Conclusion: The revised sign program is consistent with Planning Commission direction.
Staff supports the re-location of the signs.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed sign program for the Etco Plaza development, as
conditioned, does comply with all applicable sign standards identified in the Development Code.
Moreover, staff believes the proposed sign program serves to more fully enhance the development
and more fully accomplish the adopted sign standards. Subsequently, staff recommends that the
sign program be approved as conditioned.
R:',I) I~2000\0~-0448 Etco~Sign Program Staff Repofl 2.doc
3
FINDINGS
SIGN PROGRAM (Section 17.28.080.B)
1. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related
to:
a. All the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by
incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style,
colors, illumination, sign type, or sign shape;
b. The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or
design motifs included in the building being identified; and,
c. Surrounding development by not adversely surrounding land uses or obscuring
adjacent approved signs;
2. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in
building tenants; and,
3. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of the Development Code, in that the sign
program complies with all regulations of the Code, except that flexibility is allowed with
regard to sign area, number, location, and height. Further, to the extent the sign program
does not comply with the requirements of the Code as to sign area, number location and
height, the proposed sign program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes
the objectives of the Development Code.
Attachments
1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 5
A. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8
2. Revised Sign Program Document - Blue Page 11
3. March 19, 2003 Planning Commission Staff Report- Blue Page 12
R:XD P~2000X00-~Ia8 Etco~Sign Program Staff Report 2.doc
4
A'I-I'ACHMENT NO. 1
R:~D P~2000\00-0448 Elco\Sign Program S~aff Repo~ 2
5
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0426, TO ESTABLISH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE ETCO PLAZA
DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF
SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS 910-272-005 & 006.
WHEREAS, Etco Investments LLC, filed Planning Application No. PA02-0426 Sign Program
"Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at two regular meetings, considered the Application
on March 19 and April 9, 2003, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time
the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.28.080.B of the Temecula Municipal Code:
1. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually
related to:
a. All the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by
incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style,
colors, illumination, sign type, or sign shape;
b. The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or
design motifs included in the building being identified; and,
c. Surrounding development by not adversely surrounding land uses or obscuring
adjacent approved signs;
2. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to
changes in building tenants; and,
R:\D P~200OX00 0448 Elco\Sign Proffcam Staff Report 2.doc
6
3. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of the Development Code, in that the
sign program complies with all regulations of the Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regard
to sign area, number, location, and height. Further, to the extent the sign program does not comply
with the requirements of the Code as to sign area, number location and height, the proposed sign
program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives of the Development
Code.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to establish a sign program for the Etco Plaza
development set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference
together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 9th day of April 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of April, 2003, by the following
vote of the Commission:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:XD PX2000\00 0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff Reporl 2doc
7
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\D PX2000\00-0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff Report 2doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA02-0426 Sign Program
Project Description: To establish a comprehensive sign program for
the Etco Plaza retail/office development.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-272-005 & 006
Approval Date: April 9, 2003
Expiration Date: April 9, 2005
PLANNING DIVISION
General Requirements
1. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnity, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency, or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notity both the applicant and the landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
2. This approval shall be used prior to the expiration date specified; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval that is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of
substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
3. The sign program shall be modified to restrict the location of primary tenant signs below the
arched roof elements on the east and west elevations of each building.
4. The sign program shall be modified to limit the amount of second-story signage to one
secondary tenant size sign on the north and south elevations of each building provided there
is only one tenant on the second floor of each building.
5. The sign program shall be modified to limit the amount of ground floor signage to one
secondary tenant size sign on the east and west elevations of each building when a single
tenant occupies two or more ground floor tenant spaces.
6. The sign program shall be modified to prohibit logo signs on any portion of the buildings.
R:\D PX2000\00-0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff Reporl 2.doc
9
7. The final sign program shall be submitted to the Planning Department within 30 working
days from the Planning Commission approval date.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Name printed
ATFACHMENT NO. 2
PROPOSED REVISED SIGN PROGRAM DOCUMENT
R.~D P~2000\00-0448 Elco\Sign Program Staff Report 2.doc
_o ~o o
Z
Z Z Z
o _o o_
z z ~
Z
~ ~ o ~,z~z-~ ~0~¢<~
g~ ~& ~$O~u~o~ >z~
u ~u_ ~ ~0_ ~
~ ~oo~5~u~zo~ o~
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Madison Avenue and
Sanborn Road
lemecula, CA
Dote:
April 11, 2002
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
Janua~ 23, 2003
March 24, 2003
SIGN METHODS INC.
1 749 E. 28th S~.
S~gnaJ Hill, CA 90755
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655-4336
Fax: (562) 42%6875
www,s[gnme~hods corn
Exhibit A
AI'I'ACHMENT NO. 3
MARCH 19, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
R:\D P~2000\00-0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff Repod 2.doc --
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
ORIGINAL
March 19, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0426 (Sign Program)
Prepared By: Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department- Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission continue this item for
modification/revisions.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Etco Investments LLC
PROPOSAL: To establish a sign program for Etco Plaza, a shopping center
consisting of two buildings.
LOCATION: 27270 Madison Avenue
EXISTING ZONING: Service Commercial (SC)
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Service Commercial (SC)
South: Service Commercial (SC)
East: Service Commercial (SC)
West: Service Commemial (SC)
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: Service Commercial (SC)
EXISTING LAND USE: Building Under Construction
SURROUNDING LAND
USES: North: Commercial
South: Commercial
East: Interstate 15
West: Vacant
BACKGROUND
On September 15, 2001, the Planning Commission approved a Development Plan (PA00-0448)
allowing the development of two 35,400 square foot, three-story commercial/office buildings on two
separate abutting parcels. In accordance with Code Section 17.28.020(A), Condition of Approval
No. 33 requires that the applicant submit a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by
the Planning Commission prior to issuance of occupancy permits for the buildings.
Development Code Section 17.28.080 specifies that the purpose of a sign program is to ensure that
all proposed signs on-site are in harmony with other on-site signs, buildings and surrounding
developments. This harmony.is achieved through the evaluation of sign design elements including
R:~D PX2000\00-0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff Report doc
materials, letter style, colors, illumination, sign type and shape in relation to the buildings and
development they identify.
The Development Code also specifies that the sign program shall comply with all adopted sign
standards. However, flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location and height if the
proposed sign program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives of
the adopted sign standards.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Building Architecture
The two approved three-story buildings will be constructed of tilt-up concrete with matching
architectural design. The buildings will appear adjoined by way of a central extedor courtyard,
waterscape and decorative column features. Numerous diamond shaped etchings will be scored
into the concrete walls and painted to provide the appearance of further relief. Exterior balconies will
be provided on some elevations. The two building base colors will consist of off white and light tan.
Three accent colors will be utilized to highlight windows, balconies, roof cornices and diamond
shaped etchings including dark tan, clay and raw umber. A patina green corrugated metal roof is
proposed along with light bronze window glazing and anodized aluminum window frames.
Sign Program
Freestandin.q Siqns
The applicant's sign program proposes two sixty-four square foot freestanding monument signs (see
Exhibit G of sign program) to be located along the Madison Avenue frontage. The signs will have
three sign panels on each side along with a decorative cornice cap and base. The sign cabinets will
be internally illuminated with routed letters backed with white acrylic. Only the copy will be
illuminated, not the overall face. The cornice cap and base of the sign will be fabricated from
aluminum. A variety of paint colors will be utilized on the sign structure that match the building paint
colors. No freestanding freeway-oriented signs are proposed in association with this sign program.
Wall Mounted Siqns
The applicant proposes a maximum of one 87.5 square foot "primary tenant" sign per building
elevation (see Exhibit D of sign program). Furthermore, a maximum of four "primary tenant" signs
will be permitted per building. A variety of location options are proposed (see Exhibits A, B & C of
the sign program) including two on the east and west building elevations and one on the north and
south building elevations. The signs will be constructed using individual reverse-pan aluminum
channel letters with a Futura Heavy BT font. Internal white neon halo illumination wilt be utilized. The
color of letter faces will be "Bark Mulch" (clay) which matches one of the building accent colors.
A maximum of four, 30 square foot "secondary tenant" signs are also proposed per building
elevation (see Exhibit E of sign program). Moreover, a maximum of eight "secondary tenant" signs
will be allowed per building. A variety of location options are proposed (see exhibits A, B & C of the
sign program) including four on the east and west building elevations, three on the south elevation
of Building 1, two on the south elevation of Building 2, two on the north elevation of Building 1 and
three on the north elevation of Building 2. The signs will be constructed using individual reverse-pan
aluminum channel letters with a Futura Heavy BT font. Internal white halo illumination will be utilized.
The color of letter faces will be "Loggia" (off white) which matches one ol the building wall face
colors.
ANALYSIS
Staff has evaluated the proposed sign program with the applicable sign standards of the
Development Code. It has been determined that the applicant proposes to deviate from several of
these sign standards. The following matrixes compare the specific applicable sign standards of the
Development Code with the applicant's corresponding sign program, Issues in bold represent
standards in which a deviation is proposed by the applicant. Non-bolded issues represent standards
in which both the City and applicant are consistent, It should be noted that staff has not
recommended that any adopted sign standard be reduced below the existing standard.
Freestanding Multi-Tenant Identification Signs
Issue Development Code Sign Standard Applicant's Proposed Sign
Standard
Number of signs One sign per 300 lineal feet of street Two signs per 458 lineal feet
frontage per shopping center of street frontage
Maximum sign Twelve foot maximum Eight foot maximum
structure height
Maximum sign area One-hundred square foot maximum Sixty-four square foot maximum
per sign
Maximum number Two maximum One maximum
of signs per panel
Minimum sign Ten inches Sixteen inches
panel height
Minimum letter size Five inches Twelve inches
Sign location At least 5 feet from right-of-way or property Same
line or 17 feet from face of curb whichever
is less
Maximum number Two Two
of sides on sign
Architectural Required at top, baseandsidesofsigns Only provided at top and
elements base
Landscaping 200 square foot landscape area around Same
perimeter of sign
Address Freestanding signs shall include An address is provided on
address ranges for businesses on site side of sign
Sign Width Eight foot maximum Exceeds nine feet
R:X,D PX2000\00-0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff Report.doc
3
Wall Mounted Signs for Building with Three Stories or more in Commercial Districts
Primary Tenant Signs
Issue Development Code Sign Standard Applicant's Proposed Sign
Standard
Maximum number Two Four
of signs per
building
Maximum sign area 175 square feet 87.5 square feet
per elevation
Maximum letter 2 foot -10 inches 2 foot if single line sign, 1 foot-8
height inches if double line sign
Maximum symbol 4 foot- 6 inches 4 foot
height
Copy of sign Same copy for two allowed signs Same copy for two signs
Number of lines of Single line Single or double line
copy
Illumination Allowed Proposed
Maximum sign 60 percent 85 percent
copy height to
sign placement
area height
Maximum sign 80 pement 80 pement
copy width to sign
:~lacement area
width
Sign location No part of sign can be located within No such requirements
extreme left or right ten percent of width
of sign placement area
Secondary Tenant Signs
Issue Development Code Sign Standard Applicant's Proposed Sign
Standard
Maximum number Four Eight
of signs per
building
Maximum number Two Four
of signs per
elevation
Maximum sign 30 square feet maximum 120 square feet maximum
area per elevation
Maximum letter 10 inches 18 inches
height
Maximum symbol 16 inches 24 inches
height
Location of Located below the second floor Located below the second floor
secondary tenant
signs
Retail shops with Maximum of one sign per building Standards not addressed in
exterior doors on frontage. Maximum of one square foot sign program
ground level of of sign area per lineal foot of business
office building frontage
Total Freestanding & Wall Mounted Signs
Issue Development Code Sign Applicant's Proposed Sign
Standard Standard
Maximum number of signs Four, including all No standard proposed
per business freestanding and wall
mounted signs onsite
R:~D PX2000\00-0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff Report.doc
5
Staff believes the stdct application of the existing applicable Development Code sign standards will
serve to ensure that the quality of the building architecture is not diminished due to excessive
signage. Therefore, staff recommends the sign program be revised whereby all the above non-
conforming sign regulations are modified to comply with all existing applicable sign standards within
the Development Code. In addition to the stdct application of the Development Code standards, staff
also recommends that all wall mounted signage be limited to the east and west elevations of both
buildings. Staff believes the east and west building elevations provide more than adequate sign
location options so as to be visible from both Madison Avenue and Interstate 15.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed sign program for the Etco Plaza development does not
comply with all applicable sign standards identified in the Development Code. Moreover, staff does
not believe the proposed sign standard deviations serve to more fully enhance the development ncr
do they more fully accomplish the adopted sign standards. Subsequently, staff does not believe the
required findings for sign program approval can be made, and therefore, recommends that the sign
program be continued to allow for modification and revisions.
Attachments
1. Proposed Sign Program Document - Blue Page 7
2. Exhibits - Blue Page 8
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Map
C. Zoning Map
R:X,D I~2000\004M~8 Etco\Sign Program Staff Report.doc
6
ATrACHMENT NO. 1
PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM DOCUMENT
R:\D P~2000\00-0448 Etco~Sign Progxam Staff Report.doc
7
A'I-I'ACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:\D P~2000~00-0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff ReporLdoc
8
CITY OFTEMECULA
PROJECT SITE
CASE NO.- PA02-0587
EXHIBIT - A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - MARCH 19, 2003
R:\D P~2000\00-0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff Report.doc
) )
CITY OF TEMECULA
:-.-:-:-i.:.i.: PROJECT SITE
'
'.:,:.:.
)000 '.:
>000 ..:.:
:)00000000
EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(SC) Service Commercial
.:.:
:'":'":'":' PROJECT SITE
· : · .: ·:
:' :' :.:.i.:.[.:.:.: ,..:...:...:...: ="~
' " '"
"""" :~:~:i:::
EXHIBIT C - ZONING
DESIGNATION - (SC) Service Commercial
CASE NO. - PA02-0587
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- MARCH 19, 2003
R:XD P~000\00-0448 Etco\Sign Program Staff Report.doc
SIGN PROGRAM
Location:
Sanborn Road
Temecuta, CA
Date:
April 11, 2002
\
Revisions:
April 25, 2002
May 13, 2002
May 22, 2002
June 14, 2002
June 20, 2002
June 27, 2002
January 23, 2003
SIGN METHODS INC.
1749 E. 28th St.
Signal Hill, CA 92806
(562) 989-5755
(800) 655-4336
Fax: (562) 427-6875
www.signmethods.com
Exhibit A
ITEM #5
ClTY OFTEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Matthew Harris,W~sssociate Planner
DATE: April 9, 2003
Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Rainbow Canyon Shopping Center (PA02-
SUBJECT: 0340)
The above referenced application establishes guidelines and criteria for a future
retail/commercial shopping complex on a 14.3 acre site. The project site is located on the
southeast and southwest corners of State Highway 79 South and Pechanga Boulevard. Since
being continued to the April 9, 2003 meeting, the applicant has again requested that the item be
continued to the April 23, 2003 Planning Commission meeting. The additional time will allow for
refinement of building amhitecture and architectural details.
R:\DESIGN GUIDELINES~nd Continuance Memo.doc
1
ITEM #6
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 9, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0334 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Rick Rush, Associate Planner
1. ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0334 pursuant to Section
15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA02-0334, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 27,706 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE
BUILDING ON 1.67 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON
JEFFERSON AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-400-037
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Diamond Central Investors
PROPOSAL: Planning Application to design, construct, and operate a
27,706 square foot two-story office building
LOCATION: Located on Jefferson Avenue and north of Via Montezuma
EXISTING ZONING: Community Commercial (CC)
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: CommunityCommemial (CC)
South: Community Commercial (CC)
East: Service Commercial (SC)
West: Community Commercial (CC)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial (CC)
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Hotel
South: Office Buildings
East: Automobile Dealership
West: Office Buildings
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Stuff ReporLdoc
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot area (gross): 72,560 (1.67 acres)
Lot area (net) 64,189 (1.47 acres)
Building square footage: 27,706 square feet
Building height: 38'-0"
Landscaped area: 19,997 square feet (27.6%)
Parking required: 90 vehicular, 4 handicapped, 4 bicycle, and 4 motorcycle
Parking provided: 90 vehicular, 5 handicapped, 4 bicycle, and 4 motorcycle
Lot coverage: 19.7%
Floor area ratio: .38
Target floor area ratio: .30
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted the application for review on June 21, 2002. A Development Review
Meeting was held on August 8, 2002, and as a result of this meeting the applicant was furnished a
detailed list of revisions required for the project. The applicant addressed all of the revisions and
resubmitted on December 6, 2002. After resubmitting, the applicant requested a meeting with staff
to discuss the possibility of increasing the square footage of the building from 21,870 square feet to
27,706 square feet. It was agreed that staff would support the increased square footage because of
the exceptional architecture and landscaping being proposed.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Planning Application No. 02-0334 is a request to construct a 27,706 square foot two-story
speculative office building located on a 1.67-acre site. The proposed floor area ratio of .38 exceeds
the target floor area ratio for the Community Commercial zoning district of .30. As a part of the
application the applicant is requesting an increase in the Floor Area Ratio. The project is located on
Jefferson Avenue north of Via Montezuma. The proposed building will be located on a vacant lot
within the existing Jefferson Plaza complex. Access to the site is taken from Jefferson Avenue via a
forty-foot wide joint use driveway. The proposed parking for the site is located along the north and
south elevations of the building.
The building will be constructed utilizing steel framing with mini-brick veneers mounted to the
exterior of the building. The applicant is proposing to screen the mechanical equipment with sheet
metal panels finished with silver factory applied finish. The factory finish will also be applied to the
horizontal metal elements, break metal elements between the windows, aluminum storefront system,
overhead canopy, and the pilaster caps. The front entry has been located along the north elevation
directly adjacent to the main parking field.
Along the east property line the applicant is proposing to provide two separate carport structures.
The carports are to be constructed utilizing steel framing painted to match the silver factory finish
R:\D P~2002\02 0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Reporl.doc
2
and bdck veneers. The proposed trash enclosure will be constructed with split-face masonry and a
metal fascia finished with the silver factory finish.
The applicant is providing 19,997 square feet of landscaping, which is twenty eight percent of the
entire site. The applicant has provided an employee lunch area along the west elevation of the
building. The applicant has provided a decorative entry statement along the main entrance to the
building. Included in this area is a combination of color concrete paving with a light broom finish,
and three queen palm trees.
ANALYSIS
Staff can make the required findings necessary to approve a two-story office building located in the
Community Commercial zoning district and supports the requested increase in the floor area ratio.
The floor area ratio for the project is .38, which exceeds the target .30 for the Community
Commercial zoning district. The Code offers incentives to increase the floor area ratio to 1.0, if the
applicant can meet at least one of the following criteria (Section 17.08.050):
1. The project includes use(s), which provide outstanding and exceptional benefits to the city
with respect to the employment, fiscal, social and economic needs of the community.
2. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscaping design amenities, which
reflect an attractive image and character to the city.
3. The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the city, beyond those
required mitigation impact measures.
Staff has determined that the proposed building architecture provides exceptional architecture and
meets cdteria number two as stated above. The proposed building design exceeds the architectural
standards of the Development Code and the architectural policies in the City-Wide Design
Guidelines. The creative radial entry statement being proposed by the applicant not only exceeds
the requirement for offering an interesting entry statement, it also helps to vary the building shape.
The entry statement provides a prominent entry point to the proposed building utilizing a
combination of storefront glass, bdck, silver factory finished metal, decorative paving and
landscaping. The proposed architecture and building materials in some respects, exceeds the level
of quality of the existing buildings within the Jefferson Plaza.
The proposed landscaping exceeds the minimum requirements of the Development Code and
complements the architectural design theme. The entire building is surrounded by landscaping
except for the areas designated as entry points to the building. The landscaping and decorative
paving located at the building's main entrance is a quality design, and which serves as a prominent
entry statement as well as an area for visitors to congregate. The employee lunch area along the
west building elevation creates an area for employees, as well as visitors to the building, a shaded
area to enjoy lunch or relax.
Due to grade differences between the parking lot and Interstate 15, the carports will not be visible
along the freeway. The proposed materials for the carports are consistent with the materials utilized
on the proposed building. Staff has determined that the structures will be a quality addition to the
project.
The proposed site planning and circulation is consistent with the commercial development
pedormance standards in the Development Code. The proposed site plan has eliminated any
conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular traffic by locating the pedestrian access parallel with the
vehicular access and by providing sidewalks along the building elevations that lead to all of the
R:~D P~2002\024)334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
3
building entrances. The required loading spaces have been located to along the north elevation of
the building and will not be visible from the public dght of way. The drive aisles provided am a
minimum twenty-four feet wide, and the applicant has provided a hammerhead turnaround on site to
allow fire trucks to cimulate on site.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project is exempt from environmental review based on Section 15332 (In-Fill Development
Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and there are no potentially significant
environmental constraints on the site. The project qualifies for a Class 32 infill development
exemption because the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning
regulations; is located on a site within the city limits, which is served by all utilities; and is less than 5
acres in area.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City's Design
Guidelines, and conforms to all of the applicable development regulations. Staff recommends
approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Floor Area Ratio Increase (Section 17.08.050)
1. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscaping design amenities, which
reflect an attractive image and character to the city.
The proposed building architecture provides exceptional architecture and landscaping
design amenities. The entry statement provides a prominent entry point to the proposed
building utilizing a combination of storefront glass, brick, silver factory finished metal,
decorative paving and landscaping. The entire building is surrounded by landscaping
except for the areas designated as entry points to the building. The landscaping and
decorative paving located at the building's main entrance is a quality design, which sen/es
as a prominent entry statement as well as an area for visitors to congregate.
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecuia and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as
the development standards for Community Commercial (CC) zoning district in the City of
Temecula Development Code. An office building is a typical land use found in the
Community Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use
Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatibility with existing
buildings. The proposed office use is compatible with the professional office buildings
currently located on the proposed site.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
R:\D 1~.002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
4
The architecture proposed for the office building exceeds the Architectural requirements as
stated in the Design Guidelines and the Commercial Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed building architecture and building materials have been
found to be compatible with the adjacent office buildings. The proposed entry statement is
an exceptionally creative entry statement, which exceeds the Development Code
requirements. The varying building shapes and offsets provided serve to break up the
massing of the building. The project has been reviewed against the Community Design
Element goals and policies found in the General Plan and have been found to exceed the
goals and policies. Policy 1.3 requires that design standards be put in place to enhance the
visual character of commercial centers that are adjacent to Interstate 15. The proposed
architecture enhances the visual character along Interstate 15 and will be a welcome
addition to the existing office buildings.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that
the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
2. Exhibits - Blue Page 22
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Building Elevations
G. Floor Plan
H. Landscape Plan
I. Color Material Board
R:XD P~2002'~02-0334 Jefferson Avenue BuildingXStaff Report.doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
' ' R:~D PX2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0334, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH
AND OPERATE A 27,706 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON
1.67 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON JEFFERSON
AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-400-037
WHEREAS, Diamond Central Investors, filed Planning Application No. 02-0334
(Development Plan Application), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 9, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon
the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.08.050 and 17.05.010F of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
1. The project provides exceptional amhitectural and landscaping design amenities,
which reflect an attractive image and character to the city.
The proposed building architecture provides exceptional architecture and landscaping
design amenities. The entry statement provides a prominent entry point to the proposed
building utilizing a combination of storefront glass, brick, silver factory finished metal,
decorative paving and landscaping. The entire building is surrounded by landscaping
except for the areas designated as entry points to the building. The landscaping and
decorative paving located at the building's main entrance is a quality design, which serves
as a prominent entry statement as well as an area for visitors to congregate.
2. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
R:~D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
7
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as
the development standards for Community Commemial (CC) zoning district in the City of
Temecula Development Code. An office building is a typical land use found in the
Community Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use
Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatibility with existing
buildings. The proposed office use is compatible with the professional office buildings
currently located on the proposed site.
3. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The architecture proposed for the office building is consistent with the Architectural
requirements as stated in the Design Guidelines and the Commercial Performance
Standards of the Development Code. The proposed building architecture and building
materials have been found to be compatible with the adjacent office buildings. The
proposed entry statement is an exceptionally creative entry statement, which exceeds the
Development Code requirements. The varying building shapes and offsets provided serve
to break up the massing of the building. The project has been reviewed against the
Community Design Element goals and policies found in the General Plan and have been
determined to be consistent with these goals and policies. Policy 1.3 requires that design
standards be put in place to enhance the visual character of commercial centers that are
adjacent to lnterstate 15. The proposed architecture enhances the visual character along
Interstate 15 and will be a welcome addition to the existing office bu~Tdings.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that
the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
Section3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section 15332
class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a 27,706 square foot two-story office
building set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together
with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 9th day of April 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:'~D P~002\02~334 Jefferson Avenue Building',S~aff Report doc
8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly ado. l~ted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9u' day of April, 2003, by the following vote of the
Commission:
AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:~D P~2002\024)334 Jefferson Avenue Building~Staff Report.doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\$1aff ReporLdo~
EXHIBIT A
CiTY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA02-0334 (Development Plan)
Project Description: A Development Plan to construct and operate a
27,706 square foot two-story office building
located on 1.67 vacant acres
DIF Category: Office
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-400-037
Approval Date: April 9, 2003
Expiration Date: April 9, 2005
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under
Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the
Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall
be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnity, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the Cites own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notity both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3. Ali conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
R:~D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pumued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevation), G (Floor Plan), H (Landscape Plan),
and I (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Planning Department.
7. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
8. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the surrounding parapet wall.
9. All downspouts shall be internalized.
10. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with Exhibit "1" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Planning
Department.
Field Color Brick Veneer
Parapet Wall Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Horizontal Arch. Elements Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Store Front Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Overhead Canopy Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Pilasters Duranar Finish UC51131 Silver
Store Front Windows Visteon Versalux Blue 2000T
11. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the
colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations to the Planning
Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall
be readable on the photographic prints.
R:\D Pk2002\02 0334 Jefferson Avenue BuildingkStaff Report.doc
14. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the
growth potential of the parking lot trees.
15. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
18. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecuia Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
17. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
18. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
19. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
20. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The numerals shall be
painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely
as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
21. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with
the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
Prior to Building Occupancy
22. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department
for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
R:\D P~2002[02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff ReporLdoc
23. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
24. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints
and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for
further review and revision.
General Requirements
25. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including aH on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
26. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
27. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-
way.
28. Grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
29. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
30. The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
31. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
32. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
33. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
R:\D P~_002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
impacts to downstream preperties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
34. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
35. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
36. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
37. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
38. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan I~ee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
39. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code, which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
40. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance
with City Standard No. 800, 801,802 and 803.
R:\D PX2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building~Staff ~:eport.doc
41. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantiallyconstructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
42. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent properbj.
43. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
44. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed median on Jefferson
Avenue in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuanoe of a Certificate of Occupancy
45. As deemed necessa~j by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
bo Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
46. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
47. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTI~ENT
48. The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
49. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
50. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2250 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2650 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
R:~D PX2002\02-0334 .lefferson Avenue Building\S~a ff Report.doc
51. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A minimum of 3 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6' x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 400 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
52. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
53. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
54. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access reads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
55. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
Weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
56. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
57. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
58. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
59. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
60. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\S~aff Reporl.doc
17
61. Pdor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and roar doors. Single-family rosidences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
62. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on squaro footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Firo sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Firo Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
63. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
64. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box' shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
65. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
66. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
67. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following firo protection and life safety featuros: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
68. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Provention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
69. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Provention Buroau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
R:\D PX2002\024)334 Jeffe,son Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
18
70. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall
submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County
standards) digital version of the map including pamel and street centerline information. The
electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in
a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the
data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
71. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit,
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection, (CFC 105)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Conditions
72. All perimeter landscaping and parkways, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by
the property owner or private maintenance association.
73. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
74. The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure
area.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
75. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
76. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
77. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
78. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
79. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
80. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
R:~D P\2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
81. AIl building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Previde
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
82. Previde house electrical meter provisions for power for the operetion of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
83. Restreom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
84. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
85. Previde apprepriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
86. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
87. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
88. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
89. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
90. Tresh enclosures, patio covere, light standard and any block walls if not on the appreved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
91. Show all building setbacks.
92. $ignage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
93. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated October 21, 2002, frem the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Consen/ation District.
94. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 11,2002, frem Rancho Water.
95. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 3, 2002, frem County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health.
96. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated July 18, 2002, frem the Department
of Transportation.
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Reporl.doc
20
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval, I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Name printed
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
21
DAVID P. ZAPPE ~ 1995 MARKET STREET
GeneralManager-ChiefEngineer ~ RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
OCT ~ 3 ~0~.Z 909.955.1200
909.788.9965 FAX
51180.1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: '~tc.,v. ~
Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: 1~ OZ ~ o ~=~
The Distdct does not normally recommend conditions for and divisions or other land use cases n incorporated
cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific ~nterost to the District includ ng D stdct Master Drainage P an facilities, other reg ona flood
control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical componenfor extensio,n~ of a master plan system,
and Distdct Area Drainage Plan fees (development m t gation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is
provided.
The ,D.!s!dct has not reviewed the proposed project in deta and the fo ow ng checked comments do not in any way
consti~uze or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
V/ This pr.oj, ect would not be impacted by Distdct Master Drainage Plan fa(;ilities nor are other facilities of
regional interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facil res The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and Distdct plan check and
inspection will be required for Distdct acceptance P an check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in d ameter, or other facilities that cou d be
considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted
M.a, ster Drainage Plan. The District woul(~ consider accepting ownership ot such facilities on written request
or the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards and District plan check and inspection will
be required for Distdct acceptance. Plan check, inspection and adm n strative fees will be required.
This project is located within the limits of the District's ~)t~-~Cl'A ('~L./I"FJ.~...~I.A ~/AU.~t Area
Drain, age Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable tees 'should be paid by c~shier's
cnecK or money order only to the Flood Control District prior m issuance of building or grading permits
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approva/should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require the applicant to provide all stud es, ca cu ations plans and other reformation required to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) pdor to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Eng neers, or wdtten correspondence from these agencies
indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Sect on 401 Water Quatity CedEication
may be required from the local California Regional Water Qua ty Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permit.
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
C: Date: ~(~) "~--~. - ,~..00~-
July 11, 2002 ~ ...................... -~
~:r JUL 1 g ~00;~ ~'
Rick Rush, Case Planner
City of Temecula ~t3y _
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO. 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19353
APN 921-400-037
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0334
Dear Mr. Rush:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
02~SB:at 150~F012~T6\FCF
R~meho Califi}rnia Water District
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAl. HEALTH
July 3, 2002
City ofTemecula Planning Department ~.i! JUL 2002
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
~v
RE: Plot Plan No. PA02-0334 ........................
Dear Rick Rush:
1..The Department of EnviromnentaLHealth has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA02-0334 and has no objections.
'Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY BIJILDIIqG PLAN CltECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the
following items are required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be
submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure
compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food'Facilities Law. For specific reference, please
contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330).
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055 will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2.
· Waste Reduction Management
Sam Martinez, Supervising Environmental Health Specialist
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
4065 County Circle Drive · Riverside, CA 92503 ,, Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 ~* Riverside, CA 92513-7600) pr~,,do,,,cW,~*,,p,r~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA--BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~
DISTRICT 8
464 W Fourth Street, 6th Floor MS 726
San Bemardino, CA 92401-1400
PHONE (909) 383-6327
__
July 17, 2002 ,, I'
08-Riv-15-6.619 : JUL 1 8 2~02 ': ~'
Mr. Rick Rush
Planning Department
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
Dear Mr. Rush:
PA02-0334, Jefferson Avenue Office Building,
Diamond Central Investor LLC, Applicant
We have completed our review of the site plan for the above referenced development project,
located at 27708 Jefferson Avenue on property abutting Interstate 15 right-of-way (I-15 R/W).
Project development includes the construction of a 21,870 square-foot, two-story office building
on 1.67 acres of land.
The extent of project impact to the adjacent 1-15 RFOV cannot be fully evaluated with the
information provided. We are concerned, however, that site grading and resulting changes to
area drainage patterns may adversely impact existing State facilities. A review of site grading
plans will be required to fully identify the extent of impact to I-15 right-of-way.
Please provide copies of the preliminary grading and drainage plans to this Office when they
become available. Comments addressing grading and drainage impacts, the adequacy of
identified mitigation measures, and possible Caltrans encroachment permit requirements will be
returned promptly upon completion of our review.
Thank you for providing us this notification of the proposed office building development. If you
have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Mr. Kee T. Ooi at (909) 383-4149 for
assistance.
Sincerely,
· ~': LINDA GRIMES, Chlef
Office of Forecasting/IGR-CEQA Review
Transportation Planning Division
ATTACHMENT NO 2
EXHIBITS
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jeffemon Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
CITY OFTEMECULA
Site
~CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT - A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:~D P~002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
CiTY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBITB - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(CC) Community Commercial
EXHIBIT C - ZONING
DESIGNATION - (CC) CommunibZ Commercial
CASE NO.- PA02-0334
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:",D P~002~02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
24
CITY OFTEMECULA
Reference Site Plan
CASE NO.- PA02-0334
EXHIBIT- D SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~002~02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT- E GRADING PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~002~02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
East Elevation
South Elevation
Entry Elevation (West)
North Elevation
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT- F BUILDING ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:~D P~002~02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
27
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT- G FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building~Staff Report.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
PREUMINARY PLANTIN{
JEFFERSON AVENUE OFFICE BUll
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT- H LANDSCAPE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:~D P~002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
Entry
CASE NO. - PA02-0334
EXHIBIT- I COLOR MATERIAL
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0334 Jefferson Avenue Building\Staff Report.doc
ITEM g7
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 9, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0652
Prepared By: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
1. ADOPT a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0652
(Vesting Tentative Parcel Map) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental
Quality Act;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0652, AN EIGHT LOT VESTING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND
EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S).
944-290-012, 013,014.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: The MJW Property Group, Barton L. Buchalter
PROPOSAL: A Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
LOCATION: South side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road
and east of the Rancho California Road / Moraga Road
intersection
EXISTING ZONING: Medium Density and Professional Office
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: High Density
South: Low Medium
East: Low Medium
West: Medium Density
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density and Professional Office
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
R:\VTPM\02 0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
1
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Portofino Apartments (16.5 du/ac)
South: Starlight Ridge Residential Tract (4.82 du/ac)
East: Starlight Ridge Residential Tract
West: Vacant; approved apartments (11.8 du/ac)
BACKGROUND
The property that is the subject of this Vesting Tentative Parcel Map was previously approved of on
a General Plan Amendment to realign the Professional Office (PO) and Medium Density Residential
(M) land-use designation boundaries; a Zoning Map Amendment from Professional Office (PO) and
Medium Density Residential (M) to Planned Development Overlay (PDO) and the adoption of the
standards and regulations contained in the PDO document; a Development Plan to construct a 160
unit multi-family residential complex on approximately 15.26 acres and nine (9) retail/office buildings,
totaling approximately 68,700 square feet on 7.71 acres and a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide
the site into eight parcels.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
The applicant proposes a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map. The Vesting Tentative Parcel Map will
retain the same lot configuration as was approved by Tentative Parcel Map 29140 in 2002, which
created eight (8) parcels out of three (3) existing parcels. Parcels 1 through 7, which total 7.71
acres, will be located along the Rancho California Road frontage and will be developed for 68,700
square feet of retail and office uses. Parcel 8, which is 15.25 acres, is located south of lots 1-7 and
will be developed as a 160-unit apartment complex.
ANALYSIS
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
The Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 31023 conforms to the City's Development Code (Planned
Development Overlay No. 5), the Subdivision Ordinance, and the Subdivision Map Act. The lots
created meet the minimum lot size, lot depth and street frontage as established by Planned
Development Overlay No. 5 (PDO 5). According to PDO 5, Parcels 1 through 7 would follow the
development standards for Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Chapter 17.08.040B. The minimum lot
size allowed for Neighborhood Commercial is 30,000 square feet net. Parcels 1 through 7 range
from .69 acres (30,056 square feet) to 1.61 acres (70,131 square feet) net. Additionally, parcels 1-7
meet the minimum depth and lot frontage dimension required by PDO 5.
According to the Subdivision Ordinance, the vesting map would confer a vested right to proceed with
the development of the Villages of Temecula project in substantial compliance with the ordinances,
policies and standards in effect at the time the vesting tentative map is deemed complete or
conditionally approved. As required by the Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance Chapter 16.18.080,
the applicant has provided details on the height, size, location, architectural elevations, and
schematic plans and materials boards for the proposed buildings as a part of the previously
approved Development Plan. In accordance with state law, this vesting map application, by virtue of
its completion date, will be exempt from TUMPF.
R:\VTPM\02-0652 Villages of Tcmecula\Staff Report and COAs doc
2
Environmental Determination
Since an Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Plan was
prepared for the project which provided conditions and mitigations to reduce the impacts of the
project to less than significant levels a determination of consistency exemption can be made
Pursuant to Section 15162 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed Vesting Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code (Planned Development Overlay No. 5), the Subdivision
Ordinance, and the Subdivision Map Act. Therefore staff recommends approval of the Vesting
Tentative Parcel Map with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
According to Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance a vesting map shall be approved by the City of
Temecuia only if the City makes findings in accordance with the following findings:
Tentative Parcel Map (Section 16.09.140)
1. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. Each lot will conform to the
minimum lot size requirement of the original zoning district, and as permitted bythe Planned
Development Overlay zone, may have reciprocal access across other parcels created on the
same site. Conditions of approval will ensure that a Property Owner's Association maintains
the common-use facilities such as parking, sidewalks, and landscaping.
2. The vesting tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965
3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by
the tentative map. Based on the adopted Negative Declaration, which was prepared in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that the
site is physically suitable for the type and density of development being proposed.
4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval,
are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat. The application is consistent with the adopted Initial Study,
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan.
5. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health problems. Appropriate City staff to ensure compliance with all
construction and fire codes will inspect all phases of construction.
6. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project has been conditioned to
comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy
conservation.
7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements
acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
R:WTPM\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Slaff Report and COAs.doc
3
subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to
those previously acquired by the public will be provided. As conditioned, the project will be
required to provide access easements across each lot to provide for parking and on-site
cimulation.
8. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby).
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 5
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
2, Exhibits - Blue Page 18
A. Vicinity map
B. General Plan map
C. Zoning map
D. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map
R:\VTPM\02 0652 Villages of Temccula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
4
A~-rACHMENT NO 1
PC RESOLUTION NO.2003-
R:\VTPM\02 0652 Villages of Tcmecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
. . _ 5 :,:;'?,
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-0652, AN EIGHT LOT VESTING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND
EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S).
944-290-012, 013,014.
WHEREAS, MJW Property Group, filed Planning Application No. PA02-0652 Vesting
Tentative Parcel Map "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan
and Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 9, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended City Council approval of the Application subject to and
based upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the
Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F and Section
16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
Tentative Parcel Map (Section 16.09.140)
1. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. Each lot will conform to the minimum lot
size requirement of the original zoning district, and as permitted by the Planned Development
Overlay zone, may have reciprocal access across other parcels created on the same site.
Conditions of approval will ensure that a Property Owner's Association maintains the common-use
facilities such as parking, sidewalks, and landscaping.
2. The vesting tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a
contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965
R:\VTPM~02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
6
3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map. Based on the adopted Negative Declaration, which was prepared in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that the site is
physically suitable for the type and density of development being proposed.
4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The application is consistent with the adopted Initial Study,
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan.
5. The design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health problems. Appropriate City staff to ensure compliance with all
construction and fire codes will inspect all phases of construction.
6. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project has been conditioned to comply
with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation.
7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those
previously acquired by the public will be provided. As conditioned, the project will be required to
provide access easements across each lot to provide for parking and on-site circulation.
8. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
(Quimby).
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Recommend a determination of Consistency
exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0652 (Vesting Tentative Parcel Map) pursuant to Section
15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally recommends approval of the Application(s) according to the specific conditions set
forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and
all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 9th day of March 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\VTPM\02-0652 Villages of Tcmecula\Staff Report and COAs doc
7
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of April, 2003, by the following vote of the
Commission:
AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\VTPM\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\VTPM\02-0652 Villages of TemeculaXS~mffReporl and COAs doc
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA02-0652
Project Description: A Vesting Tentative Parcel Map.
Development Impact Fee category: Residential Attached and Retail Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.: 944-290-012, 013,and 014.
Approval Date: April 9, 2003
Expiration Date: April 9, 2006
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One thousand throe hundrod and
fourteen dollars ($1314.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the
Notice of Determination requirod under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant has not deliverod to the Planning Department the check as required above, the
approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and
Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The pamel map shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the
requirements of the City of Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance, unless modified by the
conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State
Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration
date.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards,
judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary
damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval
of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the
Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R:\VTPM\2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs doc
4. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program and conditions set forth.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
5. The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this
project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no
cost to any Government Agency.
General Requirements
6. it is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage coumes, and
their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
7. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department
of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained
road right-of-way.
8. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
9. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for
consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and
shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Approval of the Parcel Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall
complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement
agreements executed and securities posted:
10. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Rancho California Water District
c. Eastern Municipal Water District
d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
t. Planning Department
g. Department of Public Works
h. Cable TV Franchise
Community Services District
j. Verizon
k. Southern California Edison Company
I. Southern California Gas Company
R:\VTPM\2002\02-0652 Villages of TemeculakStaff Report and COAs.doc
II
11. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer), 14' raised landscaped median,
deceleration lane.
(i) The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost for the construction of half
width of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho California
Road) at a rate not to exceed $50.00 per lineal foot.
(ii) The Developer is to reimbume the City for their fair share of the cost of the
existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho California Road.
The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property.
b. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho California Road at the proposed
main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Dedicate an
additional 10' of right-of-way for the deceleration lane.
c. Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal
equipment, loops, and interconnect.
d. Design and install a traffic signal and interconnect at the intersection of Rancho
California Road and the main entrance.
12. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions
per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
13. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of
the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207,207A and/or 208.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
accordance with City Standard Nos. 800, 801,802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400,
401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301,302 and/or 303.
g. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33ky or greater, shall be installed
underground.
i. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the
project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties.
R:\VTPM\2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Slaff Report and COAs.doc
14. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise
approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: '
a. Street "A' (private street) shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ft within a 50-ft.
right-of-way.
b. The driveway at the main entrance shall have a minimum paved width of 76-ft. with a
6' sidewalk on each side.
c. The easterly driveway shall have a minimum paved width of 30-ft. with a 6' sidewalk
on each side.
d. The driveway leading to the residential section shall have a minimum paved width of
28-ft. with a 5' sidewalk on one side.
e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards.
f. 90 degree parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a
minimum safe distance from intersections.
g. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration,
stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by
the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works.
h. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90 degree).
i. All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul-
de-sac or a loop road.
15. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other
disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
16. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Rancho California Road on the Parcel Map
with the exception of three (3) openings, as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel
Map.
a. The westerly and easterly driveways shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. The main
driveway shall have full turning movements.
17. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities
shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
18. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or
other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved bythe Department
of Public Works.
19. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an
existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to City
Council approval of the Parcel Map, the Developer shall make an application for
reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency.
20. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
21. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Pamel
Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A
copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The following information shall be on the ECS:
a. The delineation of the area within the 100-year floodplain.
b. Special Study Zones.
c. Geotechnical hazards identified in the project's geotechnical report.
d. Amheological resoumes found on the site.
22. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
23. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to de so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the
Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pumuant
to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall
provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site
property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these
costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report
obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been
approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
24. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV,
and/or security systems shall be pro-wired in the residence.
25. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit
shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
26. A bus bay within the property frontage will be provided on Rancho California Road, as
determined by the Department of Public Works.
27. A minimum 24' easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle
access for all private streets and drives.
28. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated
and noted on the final map.
29. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
30. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
31. A reciprocal ingress/egress access easement shall be provided for the review and approval
by the Department of Public Works.
R:\VTPiVI~2002\02-0652 Villages of Ternecula\Staff Repori and COAs.doc
32. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and
recorded as directed bythe Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located
outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the
final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shallbe kept
free of buildings and obstructions."
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
33. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Riverside County Health Department
f. Community Services Distdct
g. Verizon
h. Southern California Edison Company
i. Southern California Gas Company
34. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of
Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works pdor to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
35. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all
soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered
structures and preliminary pavement sections.
36. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist
and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site
including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
37. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the
site. it shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage
facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall
capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property.
The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any
upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall
be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall
be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
R:\VTPM\2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs doc
38. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
39. The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
40. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
41. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed
on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
42. Pamel Map shall be approved and recorded.
43. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
44. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the
approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and
accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
45. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
46. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
47. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
d. Southern California Edison
R:\VTPM~2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc
16
48. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
49. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
50. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to
the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
51. Any previous existing conditions on this land or project will remain in full force and
effect unless superceded by more stringent requirements here.
52. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in fome at
the time of building, plan submittal.
53. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division
per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water
system capable of delivering 1500 G PM at 20-P$1 residual operating pressure with a 2-hour
duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the appreval process to reflect
changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire pretection measures as approved by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all
information as previded. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
54. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet
frem any point on the street or Fire Department access read(s) frentage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade
of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
55. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land
division per CFC Appendix Ill-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall previde for this project,
a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a
4-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to
reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as
approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into
account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
56. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Depadment access read(s) frontage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade
of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
R:\VTPM\2002\02-0652 Villages of TemeculaXStaff Report and COAs doc
17
57. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial.
(CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4)
58. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all internal
roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access
must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved
on a separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field.
59. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access reads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
60. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
61. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
62. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
63. Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35
homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather
surface roads, as approved bythe Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
64. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
65. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
68. Firefighting personnel shall provide all manual and electronic gates on required Fire
Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access with the
Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access. (CFC 902.4)
R:WTPM~002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Shaff Repor~ and COAs doc
Special Conditions
67. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shalt be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for review and approval for ali open space areas adjacent to the wi]dland-
vegetation interlace. (FC Appendix II-A)
68. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall
include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block
wails), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A)
6g. Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a
georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map inctuding
parcel and street centeriine information. The electronic file will be provided in an £SRI
Arolnfo/^rcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone
VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and
format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
70. The applicant shall comply with ail the miti§ation measures identified in the attached
Mitigation Monitoring Plan. (Envirenmental Mitigation Measures)
71. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the United
States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Services dated May 31,2000. (Attached
letter)
72. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the Pechanga
Cultural Resources dated January 10, 2002. (Attached letter)
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Name printed
R:\VTPM\2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Rcporl and COAs.doc
19
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Project Description: Planning Application PA00-0138 General Plan Amendment
Planning Application PA00-0139 Zoning Amendment
Planning Application PA00-0152 Tentative Parcel Map
Planning Application PA00-0140 Development Plan
Location: South of Rancho California Road, east of Cosmic Drive and west of
Moraga Road intersection, (APN# 944-290-012, 013, & 014).
Applicant: The MJW Property Group, Barton L. Buchalter,
7131 Owensmouth Ave, Suite 6-D
Canoga Park, CA 91309-7961
Blolo.qical Resources
General Impact: Affect endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and
birds).
Mitigation Measures: (1). The project developer shall acquire compensatory mitigation
acreage off the project site as discussed with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service staff whose preference is for offsite mitigation at
3:1 ratio for costal sage scrub and a 1:1 ratio for undisturbed
grassland, with appropriate endowments and protection of
resources at the mitigation site. The developer shall provide the
City with a copy of the incidental take permit issued for the
proposed development prior to grading the project site.
Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading plan check review process.
Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party: Depadment of Public Works and Planning Department
Hazards and Hazardous materials
General Impact: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through routine transportation, use, or disposal or hazardous
materials.
Mitigation Measures: (2). Prior to authorization to begin operations by receiving fuel or
other hazardous petroleum materials, the developer shaft provide
the City with the following materials: the Business Plan filed with
the Department of Environmental Health that outlines how
R:~D P~2000\00-0140 Village of Ternecula\Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc
hazardous products will be safely delivered to the site; managed
on the site; and removed from the site as hazardous waste, if any.
This will include all safety measures required to minimize hazards
and public health risks as outlined in the required spill prevention,
response and countermeasures plan. All requirements for
managing hazardous materials and wastes must conform to local
and state public health and safety requirements established by the
State Department of Toxic Substances Control Riverside County
and the City of Temecula.
Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures prior to the issuance of a building permit for uses
producing hazardous materials (e.g. gas station).
Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party: Riverside County Fire Department, Building and Safety
Department, Public Works Department and Planning Department
Cultural Resources
General Impact: Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
amhaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.5
Mitigation Measures: (3). During initial grading and ground disturbance activities, a
qualified cultural resources monitor shall be present and shall
have the authority to stop and redirect ground disturbance
activities to evaluate the significance of any cultural resources
I exposed.
(4). If any cultural resources are exposed during initial
grading and ground disturbance activities the City shall be
contacted, and a qualified archaeologist shall evaluate the
resources. If discovered resources merit long-term
consideration, adequate funding shall be provided to
collect, curate and report these resources in accordance
with standard archaeological management requirements.
(5-). If any human remains are encountered during initial
grading activities, all ground disturbing activities in the
vicinity of the discovery shall be terminated immediately
and the County Coroner's office shall be contacted to
manage such remains.
Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading and building plan check review
process.
R:\D P'2000\00-0140 Village of Temecuta\Mitigatio[~ Mo~itoring P[ogram,doc
2
Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Responsible Monitoring Depadment of Public Works and Planning Department
Party
Cultural Resources (cont.)
General Impact: Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleotological resource or
site or unique geological feature.
Mitigation Measures: (6). During excavation and hill-side cutting activities, a qualified
paleontological monitor shall be present and shall have the
authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the
significance of any paleontological resources exposed during the
grading activity within the alignment. If paleontological resources
are encountered, adequate funding shall be provided to collect,
curate and report on these resources to ensure that the values
inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and
preserved.
Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance, witl~ the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading plan check review process.
Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party Department of Public Works and Planning Department
General Impact: Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries.
Mitigation Measures: {7). If any human remains are encountered during initial grading
activities, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the
discovery shall be terminated immediately and the County
Coroner's office shall be contacted to manage such remains.
Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation
measures as part of the grading and building plan check review
process.
Mitigation Milestone: During any ground disturbance and prior to the issuance of a
building permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party Department of Public Works and Planning Department
R:~D 1%2.000\00-0140 Village of Temecula\Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc
3
JUN OB 2000 [
Fish and Wildlife Service
Ecological Services
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office
2730 Loker Avenue West
Carlsbad, California 92008
Carole Donahoe I AY iB: 1 2000
Case Planner
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Re: Planning Application PA00-0149, City of Temequla~ Riverside County, Ca!iforpJa
Dear Ms. Donahoe:
We have reviewed Planning Application PA00-0149, Village of Temecula Apartments, Riverside
County, California. We offer the following comments and recommendations on the biological
resources that could be affected by the proposed project based on our knowledge of sensitive and
declining species and habitat types in Riverside County.
We are concerned about "take" of federally listed species protected under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended. Section 9 of the Act prohibits the take of any federally
listed endangered species by any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Take
includes ,'harass" and "harm", as defined by section 3 of the Act. Harass in the definition of take
means "an intentional or negligent act or omission which creates the likelihood of injury to
wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral patterns
which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding, or sheltering." Harm in the definition of
take in the Act means "an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may include
significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by
significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering."
(see 50 CFR § 17.3). Take incidental to an othetxvise la~vfu! activity may be authorized under
sections 7 or 10 of the Act.
The proposed project is to construct a 160-unit, two-story apartment complex with clubhouse and
pool. The project site is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic
Drive in Riverside County. This area is known to support occupied habitat for the federally
threatened coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila cal~fornica californica, gnatcatcher),
endangered Quino checkm spot butterfly (l£uphydl?~t.s' editha quino), and the endangered
Stephens' kangaroo rat (Dtpodomys slephensi, SKR). Populations of these species have been
documented in the Rancho California area. If habitat, such as remnant coastal sage scrub, clay
soils, or grasslands, occurs on the proposed project site, then the site ~nay support listed species.
Therefore, we recommend that focused surveys occur within suitable habitat on site prior to any
Carole Donahoe 2
ground disturbing ac~:~y_i~t_!e__s~..~?_t~z_e.s_e__~__'_l_dI_~f__~_.s_p_e__cj.e_s..o_cc_upy the~oroj.e.c~,_~t_e, incidental take
authorization likely will be required before the proposed project can proceed.
The proposed project occurs within the boundary of the Stephens' kangaroo rat Habitat
Conservation Plan. Compliance with the regional incidental take permit will be required prior to
any ground disturbing activities. If wetlands are affected by the proposed project, an U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers section 404 permit and/or California Department offish and Game 1600
permit may be required. We recommend that impacts to coastal sage scrub or any other sensitive
resource be considered Cumulatively significant and mitigated prior to any ground disturbing
activities.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed project. If you have any
questions or comments please contact Ruth Olsen of my staff at (760) 431-9440.
Sincerely,
,~Jim A. Barrel
Assistant Field Supervisor
1-6-00-NFTA-339
cc: Glenn Black (CDFG, Chino)
Chairperson:
Germaine Arenas
PECHANGA CULTURAL RESOURCES Co~t~ ~m~:
Temecula Band of LuiseSo Mission Indians blary Magee
Aurelia Marruffo
~__l~t Office 8ox 2183 · Temecula, CA 92593 Erie Gerber
'i ~:! ';: :: ~ :' Ii ~e!~l~h°ne (909) 308-9295° Fax (909) 506-9491 Darlene Sotelo
; ' ! ?' [i:'i ii Nadineg. Murphy
' ~ i: . Raymond Basquez
~::~i JAN 14 2002 !i!i
i._L1 ~-~ I : Coordinator:
· ; Benjamin Masiel
~, January 10, 2002
~ ..... Z ............ ' Monitor Supervisor:
Manuel Masiel
City of Temecula
Planning Department Cultural Analyst:
C/O Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner Joh~
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Cary Du~ois
Re: Notice of Intent to File a Mitigated Negative Declaration for
PA00-0138 General Plan Amendment; PA00-0139 Zoning Amendment;
PA00-0152 Tentative Parcel Map; PA00-0140 Development Plan
Dear Mr. Preisendanz:
The Pechanga Band of Luisefio Mission Indians CPechanga Band") is a federally
recognized Indian Tribe whose reservation is located in Riverside County. The Pechanga
Indian Reservation is the closest Luisefio reservation to the proposed project site, and the
Pechanga People have lived in the Temecula Valley for thousands of years. The
Pechanga Band submits the following comments to the Notice of Intent tO File a
Mitigated Negative Declaration for PA00-0138 General Plan Amendment; PA00-0139
Zoning Amendment; PA00-0152 Tentative Parcel Map; PA00-0140 Development Plan
(hereinafter "the Project").
PROJECT GENERALLY
The Pechanga Band is not opposed to the project as proposed. The Pechanga
Band's primary concerns stem from the project's likely impacts on Native American
cultural resources. The Pechanga Band is concerned about both the protection of unique
and irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luisefio village sites and archaeological
items which would be displaced by ground disturbing work on the project, and on the
proper and lawful treatment of cultural items, Native American human remains and
sacred items likely to be discovered in the course of the work.
REQUESTED INVOLVEMENT OF THE PECHANGA BAND
Given that Native American cultural resources will potentially be affected by the
Project, the Pechanga Band requests it is allowed to participate with the Planning
Commission and developer in developing all monitoring and mitigation plans for the
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
duration of the Project. California Public Resources code §§ 21002, 21003.1, 21080 and
21081. (See also, Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 on Government-to-
Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments and Executive Order
of November 6, 2000 on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments). In addition, given the .potential for archaeological resources within the
Project area, it is the position of the Pechanga Band that Pechanga tribal monitors should
be required to be present during the development of the Project.
Further, according to the California Public Resources Code, § 5097.98, if Native
American human remains are discovered, the Native American Heritage Commission
must name a "Most Likely Descendant" 0VILD), who shall be consulted as to the
appropriate disposition of the remains. Given the project's location in Pechanga territory,
the Pechanga Band intends to assert its tight pursuant to California law with regard to any
remains or items discovered in the course of this project. Accordingly, the Band further
requests that the Planning Commission and developer work with them to draft an
agreement which would address any inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources,
including Native American human remains. It is important that the Mitigation Measures
and Conditions of Approval for the Project adequately address the potential for discovery
of cultural resources pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and its
Guidelines. Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21000 et seq. and CEQA Guidelines § 15000 et seq.
(See e.g., CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4(b)(3) (agencies should avoid effects on historical
resources of archaeological nature), and CEQA Guidelines § 15020 (lead agency
responsible for adequacy of environmental documents).
PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITION OF APPROVAL
As currently draRed, the Mitigation Measures do not adequately address the
potential for discovery of cultural resources at the Project site. CEQA Guidelines §§
15064.5, 15126.4 and 15151. Therefore, to fully address these concerns and assure the
Project's compliance with the CEQA, the Pechanga Band proposes the following
Condition of Approval be added to the existing Mitigation Measures set forth at 14.a -
14.d of the Mitigation Monitoring Program:
Condition of Approval
The Developer shall enter into an Agreement with the Pechanga Band that
will address the appropriate treatment and disposition of any cultural
resources, and/or human remains, in accordance with existing State and
Federal law, found during excavation. The Agreement shall also address the
terms of cultural resources monitoring.
Pechanga Cultural Resources · Temecula Band of Luisefio Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 · Temecula, CA 92592
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Ito~lor We Rise To The Need
The Pechanga Band requests that the Planning Commission and the City cont'mue
to work with the Pechanga Band as a partner, on a government-to-government basis, for
the length of the project. The Pechanga Band acknowledges its ongoing relationship with
the City of Temecula and believes that maintaining this relationship is the most effective
way to guarantee the protection of our cultural resources and heritage.
The Pechanga Band appreciates the oppommity to provide comments on this
Notice of Intent to File a Mitigated Negative Declaration and looks forward to working
together with the City, the developer, and other interested agencies in protecting the
invaluable Luisefio cultural resources found in the Temecula Valley. If you wish to
discuss this issue further, please feel free to contact me at the Pechanga Cultural
Resources Department.
Sincerely,
John A. Gomez, Jr.
Analyst
Pechanga Cultural Resources · Temecula Band of Luiseho Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 · Temecula, CA 92592
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
ATFACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
R:\VTPM\2002\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Shaff Report and COAs doc
20
CITY OFTEMECULA
ect Site
CASE NO. - PA02-0652
EXHIBIT - A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- April 9, 2003
R:\VTPM\02-0652 Villages of Temecula\Staff Repod and COAs.doc
]9
CITY OF TEMECULA
,O00C',
~OOC'O,
~OOOO,
~0000,
,oop.~,ooc
EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(M) MEDIUM AND (PO) PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
EXHIBIT C - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION -Planned Development Overlay
CASE NO. - PA02-0652
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\VTPM\02-0652 Villages of Temecu[a\Staff Report and COAs.doc
20
CITY OF TEMECULA
PARCEL MAP NO. 51025 ~
TENTATIVE
CASE NO.- PA02-0652
EXHIBIT - D VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\VTPM\02*0652 Villages of temecula\Staf~ Report and COAs.doc
ITEM #8
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 9, 2003
Planning Application No. PA02-0620 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner
1. ADOPT a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0620
(Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act;
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA02-0620, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-
TENANT RETAIL BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY
LOCATED WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET
SOUTH OF THE MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL
KEARNEY ROAD INTERSECTION AND ALSO KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-090-063, 071,072 AND 078.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Vandana Kelkar, MCA Architects, Inc.
PROPOSAL: To construct, establish and operate an 8,100 square foot
multi-tenant retail building on 1.01 acres.
LOCATION: Located within the Bel Villagio shopping center, west of
Margarita Road, 470 linear feet south of the Mall Access
Road and North General Kearney Road intersection.
EXISTING ZONING: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
SURROUNDING ZONING: North: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
South: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
East: Campos Verdes Specific Plan
West: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Professional Office (PO)
EXISTING LAND USE: Retail Commercial Shopping Center (Bel Villagio)
R:~D 1~2002\02-0620 Bell V illagio Bldg C~Smff Report and COAs.doc
SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Retail
South: Retail
East: Medical Offices
West: Retail
PROJECT STATISTICS (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Lot area (net) 1.01 acre
Footprint: 8,100 square feet
Building square footage: 8,100 square feet
Building height: 30 feet
BEL VlLLAGIO STATISTICS
Landscape/Hardscape area: 185,000 square feet
Parking required: 583 spaces
Parking provided: 592 spaces
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted a Development Plan application on November 15, 2002. The application
was subsequently deemed incomplete. The applicant resubmitted plans January21,2003 and was
deemed incomplete a second time on February 5, 2003. The applicant resubmitted plans again on
February 18 and March 11,2003 and was deemed complete on March 19, 2003.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Site Plan
The applicant proposes to construct an 8,100 square foot multi-tenant retail building (Building C) on
an existing pad within the Bel Villagio Shopping Center. The building will be approximately 70 feet
wide and 122 feet long, and will be sited parallel and adjacent to the Margarita Road frontage,
generally south of Building B and just north of the driveway access off of Margarita Road.
A 25-foot building setback will be achieved from the Margarita Road right-of-way. Landscaping will
be installed within the full width of the setback along Margarita Road. The north side of the building
will be approximately 65 feet south of Building B. A pedestrian plaza, which includes decorative
stamped concrete, has been developed under a previous phase between Buildings B and C. The
building's main entrances will be accessed from the parking lot to the west. Seven-rear exit and
electrical room doors will face Margarita Road, similar to Building B to the north.
Architecture
The building will be a conventional wood framed building, with exterior cement plaster accented with
alternative tile patterns and painted to match the existing buildings in the center. The majorityof the
building will include the use of a parapet wall, finished with a stucco cornice treatment painted "Ecru
Bead". The parapet wall plane will be broken at strategic locations to break up the building's wall
R:\D P~2002\02 0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Reporl and COAs doc
2
plane. A tower element with a sloped hip roof is proposed at the north elevation of the building. The
hip roof will be finished with double-stacked clay tile roofing material. Additionally, the tower element
will also incorporate an arched opening, treated with a pre-cast concrete molding and a keystone at
each entry. The base of the columns on the tower element will integrate a slate tile wainscot. The
tower element stucco will be painted "Cedar Rust". The applicant also proposes "teal blue" or
"stripped teal blue/natural" canvas awnings above the front and side elevation window storefronts.
Moreover, stone veneer lintels will be provided above each awning. The aluminum storefront will be
painted "Ecru Bead" to match the stucco color. A second tower element proposed on the rear
elevation will be finished with a cornice treatment providing additional articulation along the elevation
fronting Margarita Road. Decorative wall mounted light fixtures will also be installed on the building
and will simulate a copper patina finish.
Landscaping
The applicant is proposing plant material consistent with the existing shopping center plant palette.
Queen Palms will be planted along the west and south elevations. The landscape plan shows a
landscaped area averaging 25 feet in width along the Margarita Road frontage installed in a
previous phase. The pedestrian plaza to the south and west of the building will contain alternately
colored concrete, accented with stamped concrete at the main focal entries of the building. Ground
cover and various shrubs will be included in planted areas adjacent to the stamped concrete
pedestrian areas. The pedestrian plaza to the north of the building will complement the color and
finish of the concrete flat work proposed for this building. Decorative accent lampposts will also be
provided along the south side of the building, consistent with the remaining shopping center.
ANALYSIS
Use Restriction
In order to encourage the use of the pedestrian plaza developed between Buildings B and C, staff
and the applicant have agreed that future uses will be targeted for this building that will promote use
of the plaza. Legally, the City cannot bind the applicant to this, but there is at least a mutual
understanding of our objective. The main entry for Suite C-101 is located on the northwest comer of
the building and will take direct access off the pedestrian plaza. In order to promote and encourage
a pedestrian 'ffeel" within the shopping center, staff strongly believes that a food serving
establishment would better serve the purpose of the plaza and is consistent with the Design Goals
and Policies of the Design Guidelines which states that the City should:
Encourage the development of public spaces and plazas within commercial developments that
can accommodate cultural and social events and function as community gathering areas.
Building Design
The proposed building architecture, materials and colors are consistent with the architectural design
guidelines of the Regional Center Specific Plan, the Development Code and the Design Guidelines,
and is compatible with the adjacent retail buildings approved for the shopping center. The variable
heights of the parapet wall will serve to break-up the expanse of the building elevations. In addition,
the two tower elements will further serve to articulate the building elevations, particularly along the
rear of the building, which faces Margarita Road. The scale of the building is in proportion with the
surrounding area and will serve to complete the development of that area of the shopping center
along Margarita Road.
R:\D 1~2002X02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg CXSta/f Report and COAs doc
3
Landscaping
The landscape plan is consistent with the landscape architecture] guidelines of the Temecu]a
Re§ional Center Specific Plan, the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan requires a minimum 32' Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) along
Margarita Road. The applicant has proposed a 38' LDZ between Building C and the face of curb
along Margarita Road. Additionally, the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan provides an option
for either a 3' high landscape berm or a 3' high shrub screen along the Margarita Road LDZ. The
applicant proposes both a 2-foot high ben-n and a 3' high shrub hedge along Margarita Road, in front
of the rear elevation of the building. The landscape berm and hedge will serve to effectively soften
the building elevations. Moreover, the location and palette of the accent trees and shrubbery in the
vicinity of the main building entrance will serve to both formalize and define the entry.
Site Plan
The site plan is consistent with the development standards for Planning Area I of the Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan, the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The Development
Standards for Planning Area 1 requires a 25-foot minimum building setback for buildings that front a
public street. The applicant has provided a 26-foot building setback from the Margarita Road right of
way. Additionally the development standards require that 15% of the site be landscaped and
irrigated. That applicant has provided 15.4% (120,000 square feet) of landscaping for the Bel
Villagio shopping center. Parking for the site has been provided under the Bel Villagio Shopping
Center, at a rate of 5 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. Five hundred and
eighty three parking spaces have been provided for the center.
Access and Circulation
The access and circulation proposed for the site is consistent with the Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan, the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The Public Works Department has
analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are
consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved Environmental
Impact Report for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The Fire Department has also
reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency
services to the site.
Environmental Determination
Staff has reviewed the proposed project and determined that no new significant environmental
effects have occurred since an Environmental Impact Report for the Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan was previously adopted on October 11, 1994. Mitigation Measures associated with
the Environmental Impact Report have been incorporated into the conditions of approval for this
proposed project.
It is staff's opinion that this project qualifies under CEQA for a "Determination of Consistency"
exemption with a project (Specific Plan) previously adopted (Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and
Negative Declarations).
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed retail building is consistent with the Temecula Regional
Center Specific Plan, the Development Code and the City's Design Guidelines. Therefore, staff
recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval.
R:\D PX2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg Cx. Staff Report and COAs.doc
4
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other City ordinances.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the
Community Commercial (CC) and Professional Office (PO) land use designations in the City
of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan No. 263
contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned
and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development
proposed. Theproject, asconditioned, isalsoconsistentwithotherapplicablerequirements
of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the
City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned by the Building and Safety Department and the Fire
Department to conform to the Uniform Building and Fire Codes. City staff will inspect all
construction prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site
design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency
response to the site.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
2. Mitigation Monitoring Program for Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan - Blue Page 20
3. Exhibits - Blue Page 21
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
E. Grading Plan
F. Building Elevations
G. Floor Plan
H. Landscaping Plan
R:kD P~2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
R:\D P~2002\02 0620 Bell V~llagio Bldg C~Siaff Report and COAs,doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 02-
0620, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH
AND OPERATE AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI-TENANT
RETAIL BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED
WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET SOUTH OF THE
MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD
INTERSECTION AND ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL
NO. 921-090-063, 071,072 AND 078.
WHEREAS, MCA Amhitects, Inc., filed Planning Application No. PA02-0620, Development
Plan "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on
April 9, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set
forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.01 OF of the Temecula Municipal Code:
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other City ordinances.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the
Community Commercial (CC) and Professional Office (PO) land use designation in the City
of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan No. 263
contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned
and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development
proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements
of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
R:\D PX2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg CXStaff Report and COAs.doc
7
the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), the
City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned by the Building and Safety Department and the Fire
Department to conform to the Uniform Building and Fire Codes. City staff will inspect all
construction prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site
design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency
response to the site.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. No new significant environmental impacts have
resulted since an Environmental Impact Report was previously prepared for the Temecula Regional
Center Specific Plan. Therefore, the project has been found to qualify for a Determination of
Consistency exemption, pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop a commercial/retail building set forth on
Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all
necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 9th day of April 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie U bnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 9th day of April, 2003, by the following vote of the
Commission:
AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D ~2002\0~dX~20 Bell Villagio Bldg CxSlaff Reporl and COAs.doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\I) 1a,2002\02-0620 Bell Villagm Bldg CXStaff Report and COAs doc
EXHIBIT A
CiTY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA02-0620 Development Plan
Project Description: Planning Application to construct, establish and
operate an 8100 square foot retail building
Development Impact Fee Category: Commercial
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-090-063,071,072 and 078
Approval Date: April 9, 2003
Expiration Date: April 9, 2005
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($84.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under
Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the
Community Development Department- Planning Division the check as required above, the
approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and
Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of the Temecula Regional Center Specific
Plan Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment No.2).
R:\D ~2002\02-0620 Bell Viliagio Bldg C~Slaff Reporl and COAs doc
4. All applicable Conditions of Approval for PA00-0213 (Development Plan for Bel Villagio) and
PA03-0023 (Substantial Conformance for Bel Villagio) shall apply.
5. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
6. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
7. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D
(Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevations), G (Floor Plans), H (Landscape Plan),
and the Color and Material Board contained on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
10. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed
below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall.
11. All roof drains shall be designed so as to provide the downspouts inside the building.
12. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly
below and with the Color and Material Board, contained on file with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
Exterior Wall Cement Plaster Dunn Edwards Paint #DE129 "Ecu Bread"
Dunn Edwards Paint #DE977 "Cedar Rust"
Dunn Edwards Paint #DE127 "Ennis Brook"
Cornice Plaster Color Dunn Edwards #DE977, "Cedar Rust"
Archway Molding
and Window lintels Stone Veneer by 'Cantera Especial', "Blana Tinavera'
Roof Tile Deleo Clay Tile Co.-(Double Stacked extra mud tiles)
"40% Red", "30% Rosestone and "30% Sienna Red"
Canvas Awnings Sunbrella Awnings- 'q'eal Blue"or Stripped 'q'eal Blue/Natural"
Tower Element Wainscot American Slate, "Rajah Red"
Decorative Wall Tile Daltile, DH57 "Grape" and "Teal"
Aluminum Storefrent Dunn Edwards Paint #DE129 "Ecu Bread"
Building Glazing Tinted Dual Pane Glazing - Dark Grey
13. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities,
which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
R:\D PX2002\02 0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
14. . The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that wii] be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
15. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" × 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color
and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored
architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
16. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
17. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
18. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The following
items shall accompany the plans:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to Building Occupancy
19. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
20. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department
for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall complete all
conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and
proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses,
and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
R:\D I~2002\02~0620 Bell Villagio Bldg CRStaff Report and COAs.doc
General Requirements
21. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
22. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
23. Grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
24. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
25. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
26. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
27. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
28. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Planning Department
c. Department of Public Works
29. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet {ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
30. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
31. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
R:\D PX2002\02 0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.doc
32. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
33. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402.
34. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
35. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
36. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
37. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
38. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
39. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
40. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Depadment of
Public Works.
R:\D PX2002\02 0~)20 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs.dcc
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Requirements
41. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
42. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
43. The property owner or maintenance association shall maintain all parkways, landscaping, on
site lighting and fencing.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
44. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide TCSD verification of
arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction
debris.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
45. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
46. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
47. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
48. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
49. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review,
50. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
51. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
52. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
53. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
R:\D PX2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Slaff Report and COAs.doc
54. Restreom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the previsions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
55. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans pdor
to permit issuance.
56. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
57. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
58. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
59. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
60. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
61. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
62. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in fome at
the time of building, plan submittal.
63. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A)
64. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix Ill-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrant, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access reads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and
shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access read(s) frentage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
R:\D P~2002\02 0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Reporl and COAs doc
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
65. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
66. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
67. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access reads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
68. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
69. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
70. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
I 71. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
72. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
73. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
74. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on ail new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
R:\D P~2002\02 0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Report and COAs doc
17
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
75. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
76. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
77. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
78. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
79. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or abovegreund tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
80. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
81. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall
submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County
standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The
electronic file will be provided in an ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected
in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept
the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
82. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
R:\D ~2002\02 0fi20 Bell Villagio Bldg CSStaff Report and COAs dec
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature Date
Name printed
R:\D I>X2{302\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg CXStaff Report and COAs doc
19
A'I-I'ACHMENT NO. 2
MITIGATION MONTIORING PROGRAM
FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL SPECIFIC PLAN
R:\D P~2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C~Staff Reporl and COAs.doc
20
° · o . '0"'~ o ·
A'I-I'ACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R kD P~2 )02\02-0620 3c V [lagit3 Bldg C~$hqff Rcpon and COAs.doc
CITY OFTEMECULA
~ ect Site
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
EXHIBIT - A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - April 9, 2003
R:\D P~002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
22
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN MAP
DESIGNATION -(PO) PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
EXHIBIT C - ZONING
DESIGNATION -TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:\O P~2002\02-0620 Bel~ Viilag[o Bidg C\Staff Repod and COAs.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.- PA02-0620
EXHIBIT- D SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:\D P~002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
24
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
EXHIBIT - E GRADING PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:\D PX2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C\Staff Report and COAs,doc
25
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0620 BUILDING ELEVATIONS
EXHIBIT - F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0620 Bell Villagio BIdg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
26
CITY OF TEMECULA
BUILOINfi 'C'
BEL VILLAGGIO ~ ~,~ ~ ,~
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
EXHIBIT - G FLOOR PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:\D P~2002\02-0620 Bell Vi~[agio Bldg C\Staff Report and COAs,doc
27
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO. - PA02-0620
~)EXHIBIT - LANDSCAPE PLAN
H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 9, 2003
R:\D P~002\02-0620 Bell Villagio Bldg C\Staff Report and COAs.doc
2g