Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03_033 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA01-0653, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH A MASTER PLAN AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL COMPLEX, ATHLETIC FIELDS AND RELATED FACILITIES, AND FUTURE RESIDENTIAL AREA FOR UP TO 26 RESIDENTS ON A 94 ACRE SITE," GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN RANCHO VISTA ROAD AND PAUBA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY AND EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 955-02-002 WHEREAS, The Linfield Christian School, filed Planning Application No. PA01-0653 Master Conditional Use Permit, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at regular meetings, considered Planning Application No 01-0653 on May 21,2003, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by taw, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended City Council approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the Application hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposed project is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, because the proposed PDO meets the purpose and intent of a conditional use permit as defined in Section 17.04.010A of the development code B. The nature of the proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the general welfare of the community, because the proposed PD© is consistent with the land uses surrounding the project site, which includes residential and educational facilities. The applicant has submitted traffic reports and staff have concluded that the additional residences will not result in a negative impact. R:\P D O\2002\02-0612 Linfield\Staff Report PC-I .doc 24 C. The proposed conditional use permit is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures, because the proposed uses are similar or function similar to the surrounding uses in the immediate area, which include schoois and single- family residences D. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the planning commission or council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood, because the project site maintains vast amounts of open space and is designed to compliment the natural environmental setting, while establishing clearly defined areas of education and recreation uses with the use of landscaping and fencing. In addition, if approved, the project will maintain its own set of development standards to be approved and adopted by the City Council which will govern parking standards, loading areas, fences, walls, buffer areas and landscaping. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Recommend Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan based on the Initial Study, which was prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally recommends approval of the Application(s) according to the specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21 st day of May 2003. John Yelesio~ Co-~Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ub~o~kel Secret~.a,ry [SEAL] ... R:\P D O\2002\02-0612 Linfield\Smff Report PC- l.doc STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat PC Resolution No. 2003-033 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May, 2003, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff ABSTAIN: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Telesio Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary RAP D OX2002\02-0612 Linfield~Staff Report PC-l.doc 26 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\P D 0\2002\02-0612 Linfield\Staff Report PC-1 .doc 27 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA01-0653 (Conditional Use Permit) Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit to establish future educational, recreational, institutional, and residential facilities on 93.77 acres and to adopt a Master Plan and Design Guidelines Assessor's Parcel No.: 955-02-002 Approval Date: May 21, 2003 Expiration Date: May 20, 2005 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. if within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. All these conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit. R:XP D O\2002\02-0612 Linfield\Staff Report PC-l.doc 28 The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application NO. PA01-0653 and PA02-0612). A follow-up raptor survey shall be prepared and submitted to staff for review as recommended in the raptor nesting survey, prepared by L & L Environmental Inc., dated March 21, 2002. Said survey shall take place during the raptor-breeding season as recommended by a qualified biologist. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations and Master Plan Document dated February 21,2003, on file with the Community Development Department- Planning Division, unless superceded by these conditions of approval. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. The Applicant shall submit ten (10) copies of the Amended Master Plan and Design Guidelines document to the Planning Department within 30 days of the approval date. The following revisions are required: a. The Master Plan shall be revised to eliminate the word Master for Master Conditional Use Permit in ail locations of the Master Plan and Design Guidelines. b. Section 2.4.8 on page 16 of the Master Plan and Design Guidelines shall be revised to read as follows: "Based upon the available net acreage of the site and building design, a maximum of 26 residences may be developed within Planning Area 2." c. A section shall be added requiring Planning Area 2 to provide a direct access path intended for vehicular and/or pedestrians to the main campus facility. d. Language indicating that only those trees existing immediately adjacent to parking lots shall be included in the required count of parking lot trees. e. The bottom line of the front cover sheet of the Master Plan document to read: For Conditional Use Permit PA01-0653. f. The Design Guidelines shall include specific language that student drop-off zones adjacent to residential zones are to be enhanced by the landscaping of shrubs and trees. g. All exhibits within the Master Plan shall be revised to be consistent with each other, as shown on exhibit 2.2.B. h. Table 3.4.3 shall be revised to indicate the use of Mosco lighting for recreation fields and courts. i. Section 3.2.2 shall be revised to include stucco finish as a permitted finish. j. Section 3.3.5 shall be revised to include vinyl fencing as a type of fencing permitted. k. The fencing plan. Figure 3.3.5 must be revised to accurately reflect the type of fencing existing and proposed, including height and type and provide separate symbols for each type of fencing. R:\P D O\2002\02-0612 Linfield\S haft Report PC- 1 .doc 29 10. Language indicating that mitigation and landscaping for the drainage course located along the western portion of the project site will be required and determined by the California Department of Fish and Game as part of the 1603 permit should be included into the Master Plan text. The area immediately south east of the lake should be identified as habitat area and planted with native habitat to support this issue. This should be clearly labeled on the exhibits in the Master Plan and included in the text document. Delete Cortaderia selloana from Table 3.3.6 unless sterile varieties are used. Delete Schinus terebinthifolius from Table 3.3.6, as it is not zoned for the Temecula area. Language indicating wall vines and additional appropriate trees shall be provided along retaining walls. q. Add the following language into the Master Plan and Design Guidelines: Structures existing on the Linfield Christian School campus as of the date of adoption of this ordinance shall be considered "grandfathered" in regard to any new development standards, setbacks, and design guidelines adopted subsequent to the original construction date of these facilities. All new development occurring in PDO-7 shall be in substantial conformance with the Linfield Christian School Master Plan Design Guidelines approved in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit # PA01-0653. Future Development in Planning Area 2 shall be consistent with the design theme, materials, and color palette established for the main campus in Planning Area lA, as set forth in the Master CUP and Design Guidelines for the Linfield Christian School. In Planning Area 3, the design and architecture shall be consistent with the currently approved plans for the Golf College Training Facility. In the event this use is not established, future development in Planning Area 3 shall conform to the Design Guidelines established for Planning Area lA in the Master CUP for the Linfield Christian School. Buildings constructed with pre-finished metal panels and set on a permanent foundation are permissible for maintenance and storage buildings within Planning Area 1. Said buildings shall be treated with rust-proof, powder coated paints, and shall be consistent with the main co[or theme established for the campus. Chain link fencing located at property boundaries adjacent to residential uses shall incorporate vines or screening hedges to provide greater privacy. Installation of screening plant materials along existing fences shall be provided in conjunction with the Development Plan approval for the affected Development Sub-Area, as shown in the Master CUP for the Linfield Christian School. The lighting plan shall be revised and submitted to staff to verify consistency with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 665. Lighting proposed adjacent to residential lots shall be setback twice the distance of the height of the fixture up to 25 feet. All lighting shall be fully shielded and directed down and reduce glare onto adjacent parcels. R:\P D O\2002\02-0612 Linfield\Staff Report PC-l,doc 30 11. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 12. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at the time of building, plan submittal. 13. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 4850 GPM with a 4-hour duration. The required fire flow for each building may vary and may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill-A) COMMUNITY SERVICES 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit additional residential units will be subject to Quimby in- lieu fees calculated in accordance with Temecula's Subdivision Ordinance 16.33 and will be due prior to the issuance of any building permits for these new dwellings. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Name printed Date R:~P D O\2002\02-0612 Linfield\Staff Report PC-l.doc 31