HomeMy WebLinkAbout012090 CC Workshop Agenda CITY OF TEMECULA
JANUARY 20,1990
WORKSHOP ON GOALS
AGENDA
I First Year Budget $ 684,000
2. Core Staff 22
3. Consultants Needed 5
4.Organization 7/l/90
5.Council Goals
6. Council workshops Schedule
012090.wkp -I-
FIRST YEAR BUDGET
During the first year (seven months from 12/89 to 7/90), the City services will be covered
by the County. However, the City must use this time to plan and prepare for full takeover
by July 1, 1990. Even if the City were to continue County services beyond July lst, there
would still be a great deal of work required to negotiate contracts and specify service levels
and costs. If the Council decides to create City departments to perform services, then we
must recruit, hire, train and equip City Staff to do the job.
As a result of incorporation, citizens expect City government to be responsive to local
needs. 'ne City must have a core staff to handle such requests and to coordinate services.
Since January lst, there has been a significant increase in calls received at City Hall.
Citizens want information, referral and follow-up on complaints. We need more people at
City Hall to handle this workload.
The first year's budget provides for a core staff to handle the day-to-day routine of running
the City and covering costs not borne by the County.
Revenues - $2 Million
'ne anticipated revenue for the first seven months is $2 million (See Exhibit "A"). $1.5
million is from general fund monies and $488,000 from the Road Fund.
Expenditures - $684,000
'ne proposed expenditure for the first seven months is $684,000. This includes $200,000
for contingencies. (See Exhibit "B')
Surplus - $1.3 Million
This budget would allow the City to accumulate a surplus of $1.3 million for the first year.
A sound principle of municipal finance is to spend your current revenue for maintenance
and operations and to use budget surplus for capital outlays.
012090.wkp -2-
CORE STAFF
In order to handle the day-to-day clerical work at City Hall and to prepare for takeover
of services on July lst, a core staff of 22 persons is proposed.
If approved by the Council, these positions will be filled gradually over the next five months
as needed.
T'he salary ranges are based on a preliminary survey and are subject to change when
presented for Council action.
It is recommended that a personnel consultant be authorized to develop a job classification
and salary plan for these positions and, once approved, the City Manager be authorized to
hire as needed. 'Me consultant would also prepare a set of personnel rules and regulations
and recommend a fringe benefit plan.
Once the budget is adopted the City Manager would be authorized to hire temporary
hourly employees until permanent appointments are made.
(See Exhibit "C")
012090.wkp -3-
CONSULTANTS NEEDED
1.Recruiter - Headhunter
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Director of Finance
Planning Director
2.Personnel
Job Classification Plan
Salary Plan
Rules
Benefits
3.Planning/Processing (See Exhibit "D")
County RFP
4.Engineering/Public Works
Depends on County
5.Computer System
6.Finance System
Investment Policies
Chart of Accounts
Banking
Budget
012090.wkp
ORGANIZATION - 7/l/90
The main goal for the first seven months is to establish City government in Temecula and
create an organization capable of administering the City by July 1, 1990.
The fact is that creating a City organization is a dynamic process which will be continually
changing over time in response to the needs of the community and the adequacy of City
resources.
The first year will produce a limited structure to deal with the initial start-up needs of the
City. The recommendations in this report would create an organization as shown on the
attached chart.
The City would set up three departments: (See Exhibit 'E')
City Clerk
Finance
Planning
The City would set up three citizen commissions:
Planning
Traffic
Parks and Recreation
Contracts would be negotiated with the County or with private consultants to handle the
following services:
Law Enforcement
Building Inspection
Road Maintenance
Engineering/Traffic
Animal Regulation
CSD - Parks & Recreation
012090.wkp
TO: City Council 12/8/89
FROM:City Manager
RE: CITY OF TEMECULA PRIORITIES
I will be meeting with you individually to talk about your
priorities. When I have met with each of you, I will compile a
list in rough rank order. Then I think we should have a workshop
to jointly draw up an action plan for the balance of this first
year, ending June 30, 1990.
Please rank the following A - B - C - X with:
A- Next three months
B- Next six months
C- More than six months
X- Forget it
Hire core staff
Lease office
Appoint commissions
Recruit permanent city manager
Initiate traffic improvements
Streamline local planning process
Revise General Plan - Land Use
Improve law enforcement
Develop Park Master Plan
Hire Public Works Consultant
Hire Park Director
Build more parks
Take over Redevelopment Agency
Adopt Business License Ordinance
Raise Hotel Tax
Review developer fees
Act on Mello-Roos District
Prepare next year's budget
Solicit bids for banking services
Review past zoning actions and developer conditions
Other (list other priorities with time choice)
-6-
CITY OF TEMECULA PRIORITIES (Analysis of Responses- 1/90)
3months 6 mos 6 mos + Forget Priority
2 Peg Hire core staff
3 Lease office
2 Peg Appoint commissions
3 Recruit permanent CM
Karl 2 Initiate traffic improvements
Pat 2 Streamline local planning
Karl 2 Revise General Plan
2 Peg Improve local law enforcement
Karl 2 Develop park master plan
3 Hire public wks consultant
3 Hire park director
2 Pat Take over Revevelopment Agency
(/settle the issue)
3 Adopt business license ordinance
2 Pat Deal with hotel tax issue
3 Review developer fees
3 Act on Mello-Roos District
Karl 2 Prepare next year's budget
2 Pat Solicit bids for banking
2 Pat Review past zoning actions and
developer conditions.
-7-
Councilmember Peg Moore - Other Concerns
Traffic
Study update
Prohibit large trucks morning, evening
Prohit U turns
Traffic expediters on bridges at peak hours
Re-stripe bridges
North/south road on west side
Margarita & Kaiser Pkway on eastside
Traffic flow in old town - any one ways?
Creek bed roads
City Hall
Should be class building
East side/traffic/share yard with county?
5 year adequate lease
Redevelopment
Be sure county does not drop it
Sheriff
Need store front office
Augmented staff
Enforcement
Overnight truck parking on streets
Sign ordinance
Pujol Street junk yard
Prohibit vehicles with "for sale" signs on streets
Disaster Plans.
Seminar on the Planning Dept processes.
Single item motions (line item veto).
Financial opinion on Mello-Roos.
Contract for street cleaning?
Cemetary - do we own it?
Underground electric lines.
Paper collection boxes needed.
Business license, to include eliminating roadside vendors.
Planting I-15 median & entrance/exit lanes.
-8-
COUNCIL WORKSHOPS
SLJBJECT -DATE
1. Sheriff - Workload/Contract 1/27 Sat,
1/30 Tues.
2/1-2-3
2. CSA - School - City - County 2/6 Tues.
Long range joint planning
3. Mello Roos 2/20 Tues.
Consultant Report/Action 2/27 Tues.
4. Planning/Consultant 3/6 Tues.
Processing, SWAP, WRAG
5. Disaster/Fire 3/20 Tues.
6. Roads/Assessment Districts/Flood Control 4/3 Tues.
7. Building Safety 4/17 Tues.
8. Redevelopment 511 Tues.
9. Health Dept. 5115 Tues.
10. Budget Hearings June
012090.wkp -9-
tpJIIN,LticTIGIIE &ASSOCIA- z@S
3160 Cwnino Del Rio Solith Suite 205
San Diego, California 92108
(619)281-7724
I.'."LX (619) 281-3439 IN"NI) EMPIRE
preridcnt (71.4)787.1124
January 16, 1990
Mr. Frank Aleshire
City Manager
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
Dear Frank:
In accordance with our agreement I am pleased to submit this revenue projection for the City of
Temecula for the current fiscal year. We have projected general fund revenue of $1,541,607
and Road Fund revenue of $488,648 to be received by the City of Temecula through June 1990.
These revenue projections differ from those contained in the revised revenue forecast prepared
by our firm In September 1989. The reasons for the differences vary and are explained in the
narrative description of the revenues. Attached Is a monthly forecast of the revenue for your
use in planning expenditures through the balance of the year. The following table summarizes
the revenues, while the text that follows the table discusses the basis for each of the projected
2MOunts.
GENERAL FUND
Sales Tax $766,465
Property Tax 0
Motor Vehicle In.Lfeu 529,025
Cigarette Tax 30,447
Franchise Tax 0
Real Property Transfer Tax 89.010
Transient Occupancy Tax 126,660
Licenses & Permits 0
Planning Services 0
Vehicle Code Fines 0
Fines, Forfeitures & Penalties 0
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $1,541,607
ROAD FUND
Section 2106 $ 90,971
Section 2107 174,288
Section 2107.5 61000
Measure "A" funds 109,136
LTF 1084263
TOTAL ROAD FUND $488,648
wmmwmmmmm
Grand Total $2,030,265
EXHIBIT ii@it
Mr. Frank Aleshlre 2 January 16, logo
General Fund
1. Sales Tax
We have made a downward revision of the estimate of sales tax revenue from that contained in
the "Revised City Revenue Projections" we prepared In September for the candidate's forum.
That estimate was based on the City receiving an apportionment equal to one-half year'$ of
sales taxes. However, the State's schedule of apportionment Is such that the City will actually
receive 30.625% of a full year's amount through June 1990. Therefore, we are currently
projecting $766,465 Of actual receipts through June 1990. This Is likely to be understated
since the amount of new retail commercial development that has taken place has exceeded that
used In the Incorporation study. If the amount of retail sales has increased accordingly, the
amount of sales tax revenues should exceed our current projection of $766,465.
The State Board of Equalization Is currently segregating all businesses that remit sales tax to
the State based on the maps supplied to the BOE by the City. When that segregation Is
completed, the SOE will apportion the 1% sales tax revenue collected from within the City
limits to the City beginning In March 1990 for the sales In the January to March quarter.
The following shows the determination of the apportionment to be received by the City:
Month Rece@ @rcent gf QuarlQr
March 22.5% of January - March
April 22.5% of January - March
May 45% of January - March
June 10% of January - March
22.5% of April - June
The contact person at the State Board of Equalization for sales tax information Is Jim
Munek2wa at (916) 739-3358.
2. Property Tax
The City will not receive property tax during fiscal year 1989-9o.. Property taxes will
begin to flow to the City during fiscal year 1990-91.
3. Motor Vehicle In-Lieu
This subvention is provided by the State on a per capita basis based on a population estimate of
three times registered voters. The official certified number of registered voters as of
Incorporation day of December 1, 1989 Is 10,182, Three times this number Is 30,546.
The amount of the monthly apportionment of this revenue Is based on formula that first
divides the amount between cities and counties, them apportions a certain amount to a few
cities that have special statutory apportionments. The balance Is then apportioned to all other
cities in the state on a per capita basis. The City of Temecula's apportionment In December
1989 was $64,565 and In January 1990 Is $89,353.04. Using a rounded average of
$75,000 per month, we project total revenue from this source for the current fiscal year of
Mr. Frank Aleshire3 January 16, 1990
$525,000. This Is $301,836 greater than the projection we made In September for the
candidates forum.
The contact person for this revenue source In the State Controller's Office Is Linda Robinson at
(916) 322-5088.
4. Cigarette Tax
Cigarette tax Is provided by the State based on 1.25% of sales tax and a per capita amount
based on the population of all cities In the state, The City of Temecula began receiving Its
share that Is based on population In December. The population used was the three times
registered voters number of 30,546 noted above. The portion based on sales tax revenue will
not be apportioned lo the City until March when the State Board of Equalization completes Its
apportionment of sales tax for the Quarter which started on January 1, 1990. At that time the
City will receive both the portion related to population and the portion related to the
percentage of sales tax revenue.
The amount of cigarette tax revenue received In December 1989 was $3,200.14. The amount
that the City will received In January Is $2,766-36. Using the rounded average of these two
of $2,980, the projection for the full seven months of this fiscal year Is $20,860 on the
basis of population. If we add to this a conservative projection on the basis of sales tax
revenue using 1.25% of the above noted sales tax projection, the City will receive an
additional $9,580 for the balance of the fiscal year starting with the March apportionment.
Consequently, we project $30,440 from this revenue source for the fiscal year.
The contact person for cigarette tax revenue In the State Controller's Office is Pete Meeda at
(916) 322-4462. The contact person for cigarette tax revenue at the State Board of
F:qU21ization is Mike Lee at (916) 739-3399.
5. Franchise Tax
No revenue from franchise taxes has been projected for the balance of the fiscal year since
receipt of this revenue is contingent on the City entering Into franchise agreements with the
respective utilities. Once you have done that, the City could expect to receive revenue from
franchises with Southern California Edison Company for electric utilities, Southern California
Gas Company for gas utilities, Inland Disposal Company for trash collection, and Western
Communications for cable TV.
S. Real Property Transfer Tax
Real property transfer tax for cities Is based on $,BS per $1,000 of unencumbered market
value transfered. This applies to new sales as well as resale real property. We used six
months of the full year's forecast for fiscal year 1990 based on the original feasibility study
projection. The County Recorder's office has starting segregating the City's share of this
revenue as of January 1, 1990.
The estimate of real property transfer tax in the Incorporation study was based on an analysis
of the amount of new clevelopment-related assessed value added each year from within the
study area. However, only 50% of the new non-residential value has been included to account
for owner occupancy of some new non-residential construction. This revenue estimate is
Mr. Frank Aleshire 4 January 16, 1990
conservative In as much as It does not take Into consideration the unencumbered value of
property transferred through turnover (resales).
The contact person for this revenue at the County I;ecorder's Office accounting division Is
Barbara Mayhue at 787-2008.
7. Transient OCCUp2ney Tax
We have contacted each of the hotels and motels currently located within the City limits to
project the amount of revenue that the City could potentially receive from a transient
occupancy tax at the rate of 8% for the months of March through June. This has assumed that
the City Council will adopt the transient lodging ordinance In sufficient time lo be effective by
March ist. The projections shown are for the four month period based on the Input received
from six of the seven lodging businesses In the City. It was necessary for us to make an
Independent projection for one of the motels because we were never able lo talk with the
manager.
8. Licenses and Permits
We have not projected revenue to the City from licenses and permits during fiscal year 1990.
The building permit revenue will continue to accrue lo the County. If the City Council
determines to adopt a business license ordinance during this fiscal year, the City could begin to
collect revenue from this source.
9. Planning Services
The City will not receive revenue from this source until such time that the City takes over the
processing of planning matters from the County of Riverside. If the City Council determines to
do so prior to the end of the fiscal year, the City would begin to receive the revenue from the
fees collected for the various types of planning applications and matters now handled by the
County.
10. Vehicle Code Fines
We have not received a response from the Municipal Court Clerk's office concerning the
accounting for either Vehicle Code Fines or fines for ordinance violations. I am still awaiting
Information from their office. The contact person Is apparently ei Mr. Bane at 275-5550.
11. Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties
As noted previously, we have not received information from the court clerk's office on the
accounting for fines revenue. However, it Is likely that the City would not receive revenue
from this particular source until such time that the City adopts ordinances of Its own which
would result In violators being fined by the courts for violation. Consequently, I believe it
would be safe to assume no revenue from this particular source for the balance of this fiscal
year.
Mr. Frank Aleshire January 16, 1990
Road Fund
1. Gas Tax (Section 2106)
The City received Its first apportionment of gas tax In December of $12,970.97. We
projected total revenue for the fiscal year of $91,000 based on an average of $13,000 per
month.
The contact person for gas tax revenue apportionments in the State Controller's Office Is Kay
Fujil at (916) 445-4182.
2. Gasoline Tax (Section 2107)
The City's December apportionment of the Section 2107 gas tax was $24,687.56. Using a
rounded $25,000 per month factor, the revenue projected for this source through June 1990
is $175,000.
3. Gasoline Tax (Section 2107.5)
The City received $6,000 In December for this engineering allotment of the gasoline tax. This
Is an annual amount based on population. The City will not receive any additional funds from
this source for the balance of the fiscal year.
4. Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Revenue
The City will receive revenue from the half cent sales tax for local transportation projects on a
per capita basis. According to the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the City can
expect to receive $109,136 from this source for the balance of the fiscal year.
Contact person for this revenue at the Riverside County Transportation Commission Is Paul
Blackwelder, Assistant Director, at 787-7141.
S. Local Transportation Fund (Transportation Development Act)
The City will receive revenue from the gasoline sales tax allocation administered by the
Riverside County Transportation Commission. According to their estimates the City should
receive approximately $108,000 for fiscal year 1989-90. The City will begin to receive Its
apportionment in March when Its receives the sales tax apportionment from the State.
Contact person for this revenue at the Riverside County Transportation Commission Is Paul
13fackwelder, Assistant Director, at 787-7141.
1 will keep you Informed as I get more information from the various people I have contacted,
particularly regarding the vehicle code fines revenue, when I receive there responses. In the
meantime, I believe the foregoing forecast should provide you with a solid revenue base upon
which you can base your planned expenditures for the balance of this fiscal year,
6 January 16, 1990
Mr. Frank Aleshire
Please call If you have any questions or would like lo discuss these projections. I will be pleased
to attend the City Council meeting at which this Information will be provided to make a
presentation or answer any questions that may arise.
Sincerely,
John UcTighe &Associate
jy t
co c:i (c CY)
co C:2 CV) Lo
CM C2 r- CY
(D C7; Cd
0 m co cli C7)
U.) o C4 Lo Ln C3, 0 0 CD C)
CD c:l COI to Iz (D C%i
CV) 0 co w Ci 0 ci t-
Lli Ln CV)
N C%l cli
Lo
C2 0 CV) 40 co
Ln:
LO 0 WI R cq
c%t
co C,4 C4 cn
C,41
co CD CY) co CD co
t@, 0 cm co
CL C) LO IV 4T
U') C7)
C4
C2 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -o 0 0 cl
co a v M (D C2 CD co
cq Iq Ct 0 cq co
co 0 CO Le @ a;
Cy N
42 CD 0 0 0 to C) C) 0 0 0 CD 40 C)
0 m C9 40
0 (M co C)
IN
w U-
0)
co 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 0
co 0 co Q. o
:3 6
c
co
CD 0 0 0 O' CO 0 C3, CD
.0 40 CO 40
C" C,4 (D
E Cli
Z3 C%l
r= CD
F- CL ul
a. to N
4) CD C31 0
CD
> C,4 CIJ CJ
LIL w
z
CD
10 C,
CL
0 M C3 U.
-% cc :D FL U- cn
o- E i3 U- Cf) co _Fj
0
tn lw to
.10 Ct r, . C'l R Ct 40.
06 d to 4d r- w C'i 4m CY C'4 01 co a, im C'i cO aD %n (i) c-) c-) (m @ co u,) p, (14 W) co
; CY
- PI IW tn C-) Ln M C4 vCD cliN t. VW en 0N N NN co al Ln wt to 0 N
44 *A C.) VW wt %I f, C4 Wt 64 Ln M in
wt 69 VW
ww
-W 2 a-) t-n C-Y) 8 3 ton
tn @,q@ iq n ;z 4; 40
0 io CO tn 0 0 N N N 0 0 W N 0 "
PI r, C,4 C,4 r, 0 m 0 N N N N m 0 " 0 q CO c%i
at to 69 44 64 C.) to 64 WI, VW cli wt le Cl) C-) N to
CD 1: Lli "
wt 44
N 0 a 0 V Ln
m N 0 N v 0N0 C4 ai a; v wi did P: 0; N
0 N 0 N N - N 0 m 0 N N N N - a 0 " U') to lw a
CD cl) to 44 tn N co
co 40
Ocovooocoovooo OoLn OOOONOOONONOOV
NNW OOVZ::OONOMOOOW
IR Iq IR q Cli IR
owv
N lw al
ult 40 N N
u to WV 69 Vol 64 64 wt th 60 40 . . . wt C,4 69 C4
a 4m c wt " n R " CL
C', 69 60
Soo
8 '4 8 mm -0 m m 0 CY 0) r. wt 09
4q n
Ci qq
0, 0 0 C.) CO 0 0 4m 0; W; 0 w v N v m m 0 v 0 0 w 0
vvt NO O" " N 64 46 0 ;; 69
C.) 6%
'c@ 888808888 8 828SCO888
c ONWVOOOW
0 0 N N N N N ;;
4-0 600 600 4NO 40 wt VW 0. Let
im
lr_o c
L)
LL
ro-
IC, iV IV ll
'E' rc
c @ .9
0- cm
vr_
Lcu IL
r cu
Si (i ! z
c CD
o U. 0 CL Lo ri r
It* 3. a 3t
w 2! m -i to
< (D 5 C,
(A 0
(3 to CO CL
as lm L 12 110- plo-
0
Z
LV Ct ok r%
v v Cy n@4RC%(D 0 V N m CY
ao W) cn t-) r) 0 CY I- m r,a '
r, CY - CD CY r, 14 a) 40 40m le -40 CY CD !! 40
cm ob 40 to 40 40 4* P) in C4 to (ID W) 69 40
40 to to 69
64
WD
LO 8 2 :: - C.) Le)
C.) 11 @ k6 10 4m qr
Cl) CO (7t CA
o m -c csi Ln 00 C'Y 0) (7) r, Ln 0 0 C,4 Ln
C,4 P, CY - C.) ID 2 2 @ N., -7
cn VW to Cj .0 v ; N ;; N
m CY m 64 C'4 CY cn .1
-7
8 a (CY
CO 0
Ct q - P% Clt Cli iq U) CO
(A m C-4 m CY r, co In C4 40 to v cn tn co (A q C.) C-i (i cli
It CY 6% tn 40 -
0 - N m r- C) 0 m 0
CIJ 64 ;; t, VW wt C'4 CY
01 44
to 40
vso,%"Owo CY OOOMVOWNmit;zl!!
N 0 Cl) 0 0 4m PI to C.) cli 0 QOMOOOMN
Pt . - q Clt Ct q r% n Iq q R Ci q ci
PI CO 40 - C.) CY tn V (D CO -
0 CY - 40 r, is in V) C.) 90 0)
cm to 40 In " 44 C', 01 " lp
A 4m IR ct
co
E cm
0 0 0 C,4 4m r- co r, 000 tn tn on
IC,, OV In, CO
a CA Ct Ci In
C,88rc-")
Ln 40-r, M cli q Ln 0LA C,4 V10 ci 00 w
wt m" 0
C,4 #0 64 c)
C%l Ln
'o
CL
0 0 0
8 0
cx
tv
CY
W.
ui
cr
C
cc
a
c
CL .0
'CL 3 LM
U.
,v 0
E
tv -j
.21
.2 cz (D
cc C2 ix, (-o
r
r
IV
1 2 o 0t2 (2S
tv0w
9/8/8 9
Rancho California and Temecula
Revised First Year Staffing Recommendations
Base First
Annual No. of Year
Salary No. Months Salary
GENERALGOVERNMENT
- City Council @ $18,000 1 7 $10,500
- City Manager @ $60,000 1 6 $30,000
- Assistant to City Manager @ $40,000 1 4 $13,333
- City Clerk @ $48,600 1 7 $28,350
- Deputy City Clerk @ $32,400 1 4 $10,800
- Finance Officer @ $50,000 1 4 $16,667
- Accounting Technician @ $28,000 1 4 $9,333
. Executive Secretary @ $25,000 1 7 $14,583
- Clerk Typist (2) @ $18,000 2 7 $10,500
Total Wages .$144,067
PLANNING
- Planning Director @ $50,000 1 4 $16,667
- Senior Planner @ $32,500 1 3 $8,125
- Associate Planner (2) @ $28,000 2 3 $7,000
- Assistant Planner @ $24,500 1 2 $4,083
- Junior Planner @ $20,300 1 2 $3,383
- Planning Technician @ $20,000 1 2 $3,333
- Secretary @ $25,000 1 4 $8,333
- Clerk Typist (2) @ $18,000 2 3 $4,500
Total Wages $55,425
PUBUC WORKS
Director of Public Works/City Engineer @ $46,000 1 4 $15,333
Clerk/Typist @ $18,000 1 4 $6,000
Total Wages $21,333
RECREATION SERVICES
Recreation Director @ $40,000 1 6 $20,000
Recreation Aide @ $14,000 12 $14,000
Total Wages $34,000
John McTighe and Associates
Ca
C/)
c
Cl)
CIQ
CO
C)
0
U)C\j co
z O')
0 a 00 CL 4-
0 0 C4 co CY 0 co 0 0 00 CY 0 Ul) =3 Ca
IR R @ @ k 0 W) 00
le 0
A P. ;z W) 0 (a 0 0 8 @O -E
0 cr) co 40 Ln Co fD t-) co (D 0
Ncr) cm 40 cm CY C', (IR
W) 60 64 44 C4 w; li 0
C4 w; t- CO
E
a. 0
0 a w 0 0 00 00 C\l
0 0 co v C.) (n 0 a) 0 CID a 0 a 0 CY CO -0
CIA CY to 0 W) 00 a 0 V)
co
R cq
(m as V7 4* 4N 0)
4m 8 11) CD CD W) m to wi
c CY cm C4 WI PI
LI)
ci
E5 E C\j
0 CU c:
0 0 00
CY C> lw -W m PI 0 co 00 a 0 LM a 0 U) T-
CR co o LM tn w co 0 LA 00 00 C.)
m Ci (i @ a)
Iq w (5 c;
(1) CY co :: Cs; 0 w CD ID
co - 0 0 ao (Ii 0 Lo co (O Ld N 0)
10 ('4 44 C.) 0 6 M CV C%l 7-
44 44 to Cf)
C4 La
40 0 co C) 0 to 0
0 C) co co v W) co in 0 0
c co ,*a (-" C, 10 0 C, C" 0 ',*o ISO
Le) 0 to @ u; @ w;
CY Ln CD (14 r, co Cl) C) co o
cx Cl)v go
E
u (b (14 CY W) C.) m CY m co
11 64 44 W) I c)
E
C) 0 40 0 0 to m 00 00
0 0 co 0 v 0 aD 00 00 0 CY
'Sac x % A 0 W) 00 00
cm a a I
O' @ 66 6 '
0 le t- in Ln
@ g ci ci C6 c; C6 CY
C4 CY V) ?% W) Cl) (Y W) W) W) Cl) CY
C-4 CY m U) W PI
44
CY CD
cr W) n m Cl) CY 0 co
OD to co
0 w Ln C,4
.C co I R
u
C CY C.) co
0 cli CY
co C.)
ci
0 40 8
0 C4
0
LL
CL
> c 11 IL
a
UZI
CL 0
c 0
0 d) (D (D t4
-C
c go 0
cj 'A
CL (L 0 a 0 E Cc, 0 C
0 0 F In <
Z <
CL (L p
Cl)
CL
.0
r.
ob
'D
tc
CL
IL
DRAFR 89-90 BUDGET - S@N MONTHS
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
22 Salaries $ 200,000
Benefits 30% 60,000
City Attorney 40,000
City Council 20,000
Rent 24,000
Office Furnishings 50,000
Insurance 20,000
Supplies 50,000
Expenses 20,000
Contingency 100,000
Capital Reserve 100,000
APPROPRIATION $ 684,000
012090.@ EXHIBIT "B"
Ideas for Effective Management
City of Temecula
Organizational Structure
ExQCut:iva Summary
January le, 1990
This concept paper provides Information to assist the City Manager and the City
Council to establish positions and salaries needed to recruit an initial City staff. This
paper Includes a draft personnel ordinance, a draft personnel resolution and a draft wage
administration policy. it recommends that the following positions, titles and salaries be
adopted;
# of
Positions Salary Rpnge
1 Accountant $2,515 - $3,132
1 Account Clerk $1,600 - $1,993
1 Administrative Assistant $2,105 - $2,621
2 Administrative Secretary $1,939 - $2,414
1 Assistant Planner $2,515 - $3*132
1 Assistant to the City Manager $2,807 - $3,495
2 Associate Planner $2,885 - $3,592
1 City Clerk $3,617 - $4,503
1 City Manager
4 Clerk Typist $1)405 - $1,750
1 Deputy City Clerk $1,939 - $2,414
1 Director of Finance $4,692 - $5,843
1 Director of Planning $5,308 - $6,609
1 Executive Secretary $2,301 - $2,865
1@ Planning Technician $20301 - $2j865
1 Secretary $1,690 - $2,105
1 Senior Planner $3,519 - $4,382
umumm
22
This paper contains limited salary data from other municipal organizations. Since
position concepts have not been refined, this paper does not contain a comprehensive
salary survey. Preliminary position concepts are Included for review and discussion by the
City Manager and the City Council.
P6.Bw 3253 - Tusfin, CA 92681 - 714 - 66@
FYPIRIT #to (I
City of Temecula
Jan 13, 1989
ADDENDUM TO RFP # 94387 - Planning Consultant
The purpose of this contract is to provide centralized and
coordinated processing of planning applications for the City of
Temecula. As a newly incorporated City, Temecula has opted -to
continue to process planning matters through the County Planning
Department until June 30, 1990. On July 1, 1990 the City expects
to be on i ts own. Between now and July 1 the City and County
envision a gradual and orderly transition from County to full City
control.
The Consultant will be expected to function as the City Planning
Department staff and may be retained to continue as a City
Consultant after July 1.
The City requests that the Consultant make provision for the
following services:
*One central staff-aerson who could fun tion as th
planning official r-the City,
This person would be regarded as a department head reporting
to the City Manager. He/she would coordinate planning matters
with county departments and be responsible for staff presenta-
tions before the City Council and other city agencies.
*a strong
The City lacks maps, policy manuals and other graphics which
are needed to provide effective presentations. Consultant
will be expected to provide such graphics both for written
agenda reports and for wall displays in public meetings.
*a comput system,
The City desires the capability of tracking and scheduling
planning cases on a computer program.
*an education and traini
The City Council expects to appoint its own Planning
Commission in March. This Commission will need to be
trained in planning laws and procedures and brought up to
speed before assuming the planning function.
EXHIBIT '@"
RFP #94387 2.
*office h@s in Temecula.-
As soon as possible the City desires consultant to provide
office hours in Temecula for the purpose of providing
public contact and information, application intake, and
communication with city officials. Office space can be
provided at City Hall or other appropriate location.
Under the current system all administrative and discretionary
planning actions must be filed with the City Council before they
become final. No planning matters in Temecula will be filed with
the County Board of Supervisors. Consultant and/or County staff
will be required to attend City Council meetings in Temecula to
explain recommended actions. Council meets on the 2nd and 4th
Tuesday of each month. City Planning Commission will meet on the
lst and 3rd Tuesday in Temecula.
Consultant should be aware that the City of Temecula is
considering hiring its own in-house Planning Director. When that
may occur and how it could be integrated with this contract are
subjects for future consideration.
For clarification of this addendum contact:
Frank Aleshire, City Manager
714-694-1989, 4317L Business Park Dr
Temecula, CA 92390
APPENDIX A
RFP 94387
lEtA
On November 7, 1989 voters approved the incorporation of the City
of Temecula in Southwestern Riverside County. The new city
encompasses the area originally planned and developed by Kaiser-
Aetna as Rancho California. The Riverside County Planning
Department, pursuant to the Government Code, must continue to
provide planning and related land use review service for the new
city until the end of the current fiscal year on June 30, 1990.
At that time the responsibility for this function will become that
of the new city.
From experience the Planning Department recognizes that new cities
expect and deserve special attention. Under our present workload
our department is unable to devote the time or staff'hecessary to
meet those expectations. To provide the special services the new
city requires, without impacting development review in adjacent
areas, we are seeking a consulting firm for -&"-he review of
applications within the city limits for the remainder of the fiscal
year.
The County. is-tr-i@ also wishes to participate in the
contract for services, therefore the selected firm must have flood
control engineering capabilities (see letter). Other departments
involved in the development review process have chosen to provide
direct service to the city.
11-SIMVTRM RI=TRED
TheRiverside County Planning Department will continue to provide
thefollowing services and function:
- Case intake processing
- Collection of fees
- Case receidting and accounl--ina
- Case transmittal to agencies for comment
- Preparation and mailing of notices
- Scheduling for Land Develoomen'@ Committee hearings
- Coordination with consultant for each case
- Reviews(y Count-y Geologist
- Admini ration of contract process
- File Retention
II 6-5 (Roy. 7/88)
CITY OF T
JOE RICHARDS
PAGE 2
The chosen consultant shall provide the following services and
functions for each case in the planning process, upon the request
of the County Planning Director:
Preparation of initial study and notification of
applicant if additional information or special reports
are required.
Field review of all cases
Representation of Planning Department and F3.ood eentrel
Department at Land Development Committee, Directors
C/ Y CocjA/C-/L-
Hearing, Planning Commission and The
Hearing
-Checking for compliance with County and City ordinances
-Meetings with applicant, property owners, community
groups, and County agencies, or other agencies
-Flood and drainage review and preparation of conditions
of approval
-Staff report preparation
-Preparation of conditions of approval
-Preparation of exhibits for public hearings
-Prdparation of necessary correspondence associated with
case
-Coordination with County Planning and Flood Control Staff
-Attendance at workshop meetings with City Council as
required
-Preparation of packets for public hearings
rim
The fees collected by Riverside County for development review are
adopted by the Board of Supervisors as set forth in ordinance No.
671. All costs for completing the subject review shall not exceed
forty-five percent (45%) of the Planning Department fees and eighty
percent (80%) of the-- Department Fees.
city OF T
im RI
PAGM 3
IV p CORTmm mm T
a.Your proposal should be contained in a single bound
document not to exceed 25 pages. Three copies must be
submitted.
b.The proposal must contain specif ic information in the
following format:
1.Table of contents
2.Description of your firm as to size, organization,
and capabilities
3.Prior relevant experience as to size of project and
individuals assigned
4.Resumes of qualif ications of staff members to be
assigned to this project, and types and amounts of
prior experience in the activity to which the
proposal relates.
5.A description of how overall supervision will be
provided
6.@Work to be perfor=ed and c ompensation in separate
sections each for Planning and for Flood Control.
a.Statement of understanding of work to be
performed
b.A detailed work plan for performing each task
and costs not to exceed the amounts listed in
Section III of this request for proposal.
C.Maximum compensation
7.Two references of previous i n ETf-i-ifti7n -the
above services were provided to. Include; Agency Name,
Contact Name, Phone Number, address, and period of
time services were provided.
@-he present the Riverside County Planning Det)ar@.Ment is
processing 61 cases within the jurisdiction of the City of
Temecula. %-hile future"case filings are unknown at %'-his t,-me we
estimate based on past patterns and trends that the number will
increase by 190 cases before the end of this fiscal year on june
30, 1990.
f i le: tem
ACTIVE PLANNING CASES THRQWQH NQVFMAFR @0, 19a9
pp 52 46.02%
GGPA 1 o.Be%
TR 13 11.50%
PM 23 20.35%
CZ 10 B.(35%
CUP 7 6.19%
SP 5 4.42%
PUP 2 1.77%
---------------------------
TOTAL 113 100.00%
AIW NOIMMIU WA -Avdwd '400WOO #o
2
E2 !2
EXHIBIT
CITY OF TEMECULA
JAMARY 20, 1990
WORKSHOP ON GOALS
OBJECTIVE: COUNCIL
CONSENT TO:
1.Hire Consultant to recruit City Manager candidates.
2.Hire Consultant to recruit Director of Finance, Assistant to City Manager and
Planning Director.
3.Hire Interim Finance Officer.
4.Recuirt & hire clerical staff.
5.Adopt first year budget.
6.Adopt classification and pay plan for core staff. Consultant to prepare.
7.Approve schedule of workshops.
8. Discuss and agree on goals.
012090.wkp -I-