Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot 48,74-80 Precise Grading LEGEND AC I\ Off 2 31 z 3 TOP OF CURB 0000.00 � T.C. D C I S GRAD G D I AN FLOW LINE F.L. HIGH POINT H.P. FINISHED GRADE F.G. D AS 8 FINISHED SURFACE F.S. VIA RAMI GARAGE FLOOR GF 0000.0 TRACT BOUNDARY M ' PROJECT 55 /SITE PAD ELEVATION PE 0000.0 25 24 109� 4 5 56 FINISHED FLOOR FF 0000.0 52 26 + 23 WATER SERVICE W 51 \+\ 53 57 22 18 Ilk 58 78 21 SEWER SERVICE 5060 59 77 79 2 1 27 20 19 � TO SAN DIEGO PE 49 RD. PICU � AIR VACUUM RELEASE VALVE (AVR) �� 48 \ 61 76 80 3 28 35 Pte` FIRE HYDRANT \ 47 � 62 81 � 34 42 �ay � � \ 46 3 75 4 17 33 INY, 19 6 82 30 32 DRIVEWAY � 45 � 64 74 3 31 43 41 V- N7 1 ` 44 83 STREET LIGHT \ 65 3 94 5 5 52 51 44 40 � \ 43 � 72 84 9 g5 6 1 � 53 � i � 71 0 85 7 14 , 2343-445 39 VICINITY MAP SLOPE � 42 67 � 92 � 1 � 4fi 38 EXTRA DEPTH FOOTING 41 68 70 -1 86 91 96 8 13 5 50 NOT TO SCALE 40 5 INDICATES AMOUNT OF � 6g 97 9 12 49 47 37 87 56 � EXTRA DEPTH FOOTING 39 89 90 1 AD ACCESS RAMP /T-5 12" 38 MIN. ABOVE PAD ELEV. � - 98 99 \ 37 36 35 34 33 100 101 10 57 83 65 66 73 1 � GRADING NOTES " ROUND OFF TOP ` 32 31 10258 64 67 72 5 LOT NUMBER P/L 9 10 28 .� 103 3 68 1 . ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST PROVISION OF THE CALIFORNIA ' 1 12 13 27 ,rsr 104 59 63 69 71 BUILDING CODE, APPENDIX CHAPTER 33, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 99-23. INDICATES MODEL �. �� 14 26 � `'� 105 ACT UNDARY � 15 2. MINIMUM BUILDING PAD AND DRAINAGE SWALE SLOPE SHALL BE = 1%. 4 16 17 25 \ ` 60 61 62 / / S1 TE DRAINAGE SWALES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF DEEP AND SHALL BE UNIT TYPE B 1 18 24 70 CONSTRUCTED A MINIMUM OF 2' FROM TOPS OF CUT OR FILL SLOPES. INDICATES ELEVATION _.. e 7 6 19 23 63 3 3- 57 ^. { ": 3. MAXIMUM CUT OR FILL SLOPES = 2: 1 . SECTION A A WATER 4 22 62 _ r 4. PROVIDE 5' WIDE BY, 1 ' HIGH BERM OR EQUIVALENT ALONG THE TOP OF ALL ,. 'Ta4gC T LOW-OFF BpV�� FILL SLOPES OVER 5 HIGH. 01 FOR REAR YARD SLOPES GREATER 3 20 61 59 ` THAN 5 I N VERTICAL HEIGHT �, 52 '4�� INDICATES STEP TO GARAGE FLOOR 21 51 .h 5. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A COMPETENT ell _ .::,,.. �r " n°W SOILS ENGINEER WHO SHALL CERTIFY THAT ALL FILL HAS BEEN PROPERLY GF = FF -- STEP " `� 17 49 r PLACED AND WHO SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL COMPACTION REPORT FOR ALL FILLS 68 1 19 53 �; K " ,s,."' .a: Y . OVER 1 ' DEEP. THIS LOT REQUIRES A BACKWATER 5 4 Q p 20 64 31 21 22 48 54 W. F � 6. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENG I NEER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA VALVE PER APPROVED WATER ANDBW P/L 3 2 1 30ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WRITTEN CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF ROUGH SEWER PLANS. PER SECT. 409 OF U.P.C. " 5 MIN. 5 MIN. 6 29w �- fi MIN. 6 MIN. 1 16 32 2g 27 26 25 24 47 817 . µ GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN PRIOR TO 3' MIN. 1 ' 1 ' 3' MIN. 1 23 55 ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE TO LINE, MUDSILL MIN. MIN. MUDSILL 1 171 15 33 - 46 56 GRADE, ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF CUT / FILL SLOPES. 7 - 45 7. PROVIDE BROW DITCH, DESIGNED TO HANDLE 100 YR. Q STORM FLOWS, ALONG o 8 9 0 11 12 14 34 35 37 38 39 TOP OF CUT SLOPES. •'e A 13 40 41 42 43 44 m 8. FINAL COMPACTION REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL FILLS GREATER THAN o 12" MIN. 12' MIN. 1 ONE FOOT. Nt I 9. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF o0 2% MIN. 2: 1 MAX. 6" TYP. 2% MIN. THE PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION BY: 00 21% MAX. MIN. 21% MAX. I NDEX M PETRA GEOTECHNICAL. INC. ON ,SEPTEMBER 23,_1998 o SECTION B B TWO SETS OF THE FINAL COMPACTION REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE 00 SCALE: 1" = 200' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WHICH SHALL INCLUDE FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOM- MENDATIONS AND CERTIFICATION THAT GRADING HAS BEEN DONE IN CONFORM- o ANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT. O 10' OR 12' v P®ff o PAD�y _,IN. LOTS INCLUDED o s, 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING an DEPARTMENT, TELEPHONE (909) 694-6411 AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE � 48" 1s" w REQUESTING FINISH LOT GRADE AND DRAINAGE INSPECTION. THIS INSPEC- !� MIN.I TYP,1 Q 5' MIN. P/L z_ z TION MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL INSPECTION FOR w � w 3' MIN. 1 ' � � A � M EACH LOT. X I MAILBOX 12" MIN. MUDSILL MIN. 1X MIN. 1%MIN. 11 . CUT SLOPES EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT AND FILL (TYP. ) CL_R. 6 MIN. 15 M.q0'leo IT-7r,(�'Mlb SLOPES EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE I (FACEOFawe 1.0 of POST) d 5' B 5' S' B C s' C PLANTED WITH GRASS OR GROUND COVER TO PROTECT THE SLOPE FROM OR (s BACK oc cl>Ra TO of POST) INN. EROSION AND INSTABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 457 PRIOR TO MIN wo MIN MIN W D MIN THE APPROVAL OF FINAL INSPECTION. P.C.C. 12" MIN, 12. DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. SIDEWALK CUR BER 2: 1 MAX. z PLAN w F 2% MIN. 6" MIN. � � � X PLAN PLAN 13. FINISH GRADE SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROM ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AT NOT E MAILBOX LOCATION 21% MAX. 48 2 3 LESS THAN 1/4" PER FOOT FOR A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET. DETAIL NO . 1 --- 14. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING S E C T I O N C C PAD ELEVATIONS. WHERE SPECIFIC ELEVATIONS ARE REQUIRED THE ELEVA- 50.00 TION WITH RESPECT TO MEAN SEA LEVEL SHALL BE GIVEN. IF AN ELEVA- o N.T.S. (oz o o z $ ( ) tox N N V N TION WITH RESPECT TO ADJACENT GROUND SURFACE IS REQUIRED,THE ACTUAL kk DISTANCE ABOVE THE ADJACENT GROUND SHALL BE GIVEN. co 15. EROSION CONTROL: ALL GRADED SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH ROSEA ICE o TYPICAL OVERALL FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS PLANT AT 12" ON CENTERS OR OTHER APPROVED GROUND COVER. SLOPES OVER TYPICAL SIDE YARD DRAINAGE TED WiITHERTICAL APPROVEDEIGHTTREES, INSHRUUBSIONOROCOMBINAATIONGROUNDERT, SHALLHEREOF.BE ( PRODUCT SUMMERTON SHRUBS 2 DISTANCE FROM FRONT PROPERTY CORNER TO THE GARAGE SHALL BE PLANTED AT 10' ON CENTERS, TREES, 20' ON CENTER, COMBINA- V- SCALE: 1 ' = 30' . TIONS, 15' ON CENTERS. SLOPES OVER 4' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL HAVE CORNER MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO THE PROPERTY LINE. PERMANENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES PER00 UnderCo round Service A I ert U.P.C. CHAPTER 1D.R. o 16. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED IN THE FIELD PRIOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES & QUANTITY ESTIMATE TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION/GRADING. w NO. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT 17. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OR ITS AGENTS DOES NOT RELIEVE Q CALL TOLL FREE PLANNING ■ DESIGN ■ CONSTRUCTION OWNER/DEVELOPER Q LOT GRADING (8 LOTS x 15 C.Y./LOT) 120 C.Y. THE APPLICANT AND HIS ENGINEER FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COR- 1-'800-422-4133 RECTION OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON � RICHMOND AMERICAN REQUEST, THE APPROPRIATE PLAN REVISIONS SHALL BE PROMPTLY SUBMITTED z 104 W. GRAND AVE. , SUITE A TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. Q ■■ ■ 275M Y EZ ROAD,1X�400 ESCOND I D0, CA 92025 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CONSULT 1 N C3 9O e7fiMa • FAX 909 M 72m w MAW.M" (760) 145-1505 L D O O- 17 4 GR j c� CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS DATE ACC'D BENCH MARK DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY �E5S1 /� CITYOFDrawing No. o/ SCALE Q�� cN�� JT JT MT RECOMMENDED BY: DATE: 4� DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC WORKS R1�t5tE OaUlnf DfSI6NIITIpt T-77-81 �4� 00 Q, Y AIVN�� e- -t Contractor 21/2'UMDISC IN MC.CYLIMSTAVED T-77-M. HORIZONTAL I-- Plans Prepared Under The Supervision Of p FFM TIE 1N`WCTION,OF FRO?TI ST.AND RANCRO CALF FS 3.4 3.4 OB■111W ON ,� o IZ!�Z�OMR CALIF.RD. 44 NORTF�EST OF RMKE CALIF.f�. 13 S1 R OF A 4 rn ACCEPTED BY: DATE.2 BQE RAIL FW,2'EST aF Poor POLE 1115 IXE. SET Flffl�IASS RT1F5S w No.60132 � TRACT N 0 . 23143-4 Q Inspector W T'OMMOF r Exp. 06/30/04 , - Date. �� / �' RONALD JDEPUTY . PARKSCTOR PUBLIC WORKS T.„ r.Arrt PHASE 8 Q ADJ.DATE 9-13 2 E11Y. 1230.562 JOHN D. TANNER III A. a...x.,.,.F Date Completed VERTICAL sr' cl t` �� PRECISE GRADING PLAN p N/A t� or C A`lE0 R.C.E. No. 60132 Expires 6-30-04 R.C.E. No. 19744 Expires 9-30-01 `''fes;�; T I TLE SHEET LOTS 48--t-, 74--SO SHEET OF 2 DATE PREPARED: 08/03/00 1 ........... ............. C6 7- J PIVI 22-11P_L' :tV I I/ i f ............ ✓ 05 _7 ........... Ln ............. --------- 'kD .......... 'fiy z 1b .......... .......... .......... ................... ........... ry _7 • .... ...... ... ....... IS .......... -cp .......... ...... 3L ............... ....... .......... ........... ...... -C ........ r- ............. --------- ............ ........... .......... ... ......... ----------- .............. ------------ ti -------- .............. \Ex-1f T., 7 F �4< DOWN-60 Nf. z _4� ... ...... T; .... ...... ............ .............. Ik 20 0 20 40 60 A, SUBD I V I S I ON BOUNDARY -4 �5-.-3t EX. MIN SCALE .0 '�'N\ -792.8 1 0 GRAPHIC +1 1 .0% MIN AV/AR ASS FL-GB C) 19 L N%y 0 IST. cv. bt 2% MIN Ckd 3 Cb 0 C/) FF 1194.5 92.0 C� R 90" PE 1194.0 15' FS 92.0 A\ FF 1194.5 8.4 FS .^ T2 15 _0 PE 1194.0 M LP 209 30 29' D/ D/W' w 2% MIN -11 (0 04 0 G 21 1± 91.7 0 91.7 rJ Q, .0 10.7% FS 10.5% FS x .0 92.8 V 91 .34 0 1 .0% MIN tA IK�01 12 1 .0% MIN FL-GB 91-34 -Ee- m9l.- 0.5A' AP) 24.53' TC 24.70' ­1 F. 3.2 V 19 04 \1 5 J-� M -r - M X 0 20J* 1 .0 M 0 IN ,ti I u, I I ,y 0 91.6 < 1 .0% MIN FL-GB F-1 F- 17. 1 Cn FL 99 0 . 0 \ rL�-' Ale 0 G �/ Co -F'-G-- 0% CP 15.64 QD91 I 91.3 n 6.4% TC 110 "0 FS 20 j-, A Cb fl/W 0 00 U) ............. 70 (C) IQ 90.8 ` C° �$ I ........... 45 15 /3 q) 0 0 17. 1 70> FS 0 59+ 2 __j .................... '5 fQ z 0 6.9% FS 6. \IJ 2% MIN qz 15 00 W ....... j R FF 1193.2 r FF 1193.2 C/) o- 1PE 11 )2.7 2% MIN C) :3 CV, --> 00 PE 1192.7 N, rQ 1, C CL C) I— Jv 9 0 \ �� 23;ft 00 \ \ n� N FLLo. 93 co 91.4 T R, Cr MZN T-3. -7 2 '.O� A2 CA \..�L-GB 1 .0% MIN 0 N 3 W%am- -me- A G• 1 .0% MI 21 -50' -1 89.7 134:. 'N 21 .00' Fel -8 2 r 19- __r 0 �\ 49.201 58.22-- 0 �u -no- -on 4 61 20'1 6 20' 40 89.9 1.O% MIN 5'± 1 .0% MIN SWI 60' 1SW 13-84 (0 FL--GB f 00 -)3 _TC _';*oo�20 114- /'<�_- �/ MAW 111�_d 1 91 �\ 8 5.CJ 6.0% 89.8 ME 1 .6 7.5% -0 0 rri 8 FS 10 2913 rn '± FS MIN 0 -A EVC ........... FS 10 179 M 3 0 n7c \ +98 (D 24 00 A3.6 C% LP 10+83 1 R 10+82. 6 FS (D C) 29' b/W CD %w C� Y_ ti /w C; o \�\, F215. 91 .7 88.9 FF 11 0 FF 1191 .6 - g.b76 QD 0 89.5 A-L 15. FS 4' PF .2 60 6 F_ PE 1191 . 1 7.4% (D/ M 0 r C) FS CD� 0 20 W j 21_MIN 00 FG 20 C) 14- 4 __9 10, T < 0 CP 0 QL 0 -1 Cn 0 _10�- I-S Ln0% MIN In IV, , . �'yry .2� 7 70 L14 CC) t C.D 0 1 .0% MIN CC \111s� v­ I . IgNs 2 .............,, I I • 2: 1 Ld 2: 1 TRACT AR ��__1 119.88 1 A 134-20 __%� //T - 00-MME-111 0.00, or � T N x R/W EXIST. 10+ 0 BVC LQ ST LT. - 4- Cb EXIST. CkG EXIST. C.B. PER 77 TR 23143-2 �• 2.5% + + VIA ANGELES C/K �. + 07) OD 0 PER TR 23143-2 _S CD __ - - - - - ,0�' E S_ - S_ 25 24 2 1.3b �A- 10.34% 26 28 S.67X 27 ------- + LO - 280' VC Cn 70' VC cr) SD SD 66 SD M EXIST. 36" 10+00.00 VICTORIA COURT SD ED _< L__ M < 0 C-) RCP S.D. =25+16.30 VIA ANGELES ROAD -W W_ -w- t CIO 0 Ci kA 00 Under round Service Alert 0 T 28677-2 w 0 CALL TOLL FREE PLANNIN13 ■ DESIGN ■ CONSTRUCTION < 0- 1-800-422-4133 V CD z YNEZ ROAD,BUM 4W 71136CULA,CAL FORMA 925*-46M TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG C13NSULTINE3 9W.676AW ■ FAX 909.676.7240 - wwwF113--.001" LDOO- 174 G R 0 CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS DATE ACC'D BENCH MARK DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 3:: SCALE WESSIO A Drawing No. 0 I/ RECOMMENDED BY: DATE:T E: /00 q14! DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1-11 J T JT M T CITY OF T EMECULA Qj RIVERSIDE MINTY DESIWIR T-77-01 • T A Contractor 2 1/2,90 DISC IN COK.CYLIUR STMED T-27-0. HORIZONTAL 00 d" Plans Prepared Under The Supervision Of 4- rM N IRMCTIM OF FRX ST. AND RWID D 3.4 EB EMEAST ON R#00 CALIF.RD. 44'KRMM OF NU CALIF.CALIF.i 13'30 OF A 4' ACCEPTED BY: DATE: lip 2 ORD RAIL FOU,2'IM OF POU POLE j 11511 3E. SET HOW IRTU 1 20 No.60132 r" - TRACT NO 23143-4 Inspector W I'NFW OF EW. :xp. 06/30/04 __Tz M Date: DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS < AW.DATE H3V EIR. 1230.50 JOHN D --Y'ANNER I I I RONALD J. PARKS PHASE 8 VERTICAL LP I%k- < Date Completed 10 1 V I V PRECISE GRADING PLAN 0 N/A OF Ck R.C.E. No. 60132 Exp i res 6-30-04 R.C.E. No. 19744 Exp i res 9-30-01 LOTS 48 74 80 SHEET 2 OF 2 s�' N­ 7 H \0000