HomeMy WebLinkAboutLot 52-69 - Precise Grading O
O
\
O
LJ
Q
O
Q
W
V)
LEGEND
PRECISE ISRADIN43 PLAN
GRADING NOTES: BW -- BACK OF SIDEWALK
DF - DEEPENED FOOTING
tIP4FL - FLOW LINE
1. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST PROVISION OF THE 1998 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE APPENDIX, FS - FINISHED SURFACE FG - FINISHED GRADE
CHAPTER 33, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 99-23. SGB -- GRADE BREAK
2. MINIMUM BUILDING PAD AND DRAINAGE SWALE SLOPE SHALL BE 1%. DRAINAGE SWALES SHALL BE A GF -- GARAGE FLOOR
MINIMUM OF 0.2' DEEP AND BE CONSTRUCTED A MINIMUM OF 2' FROM THE TOP OF CUT OR FILL SLOPES. HP -- HIGH POINT
PASEO DEL SOL LP - LOW POINT
3. MAXIMUM CUT AND FILL SLOPES = 2:1. TC - TOP OF CURB
4. PROVIDE 5' WIDE BY 1' HIGH BERM OR EQUIVALENT ALONG THE TOP OF ALL FILL SLOPES OVER 5' HIGH. TF - TOP OF FOOTINGTG - TOP OF GRATE
5. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF COMPETENT SOILS ENGINEER WHO SHALL TW -- TOP OF WALL
CERTIFY THAT ALL FILL HAS BEEN PROPERLY PLACED AND WHO SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL COMPACTION - TRACT BOUNDARY
REPORT FOR ALL FILLS OVER 1' DEEP. TRACT NO , 1 - RETAINING WALL (BY SEPARATE PERMIT)
6. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WRITTEN 90 - LOT NUMBER
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN 4C - HOUSE PLAN TYPE
PLAN PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE TO LINE, GRADE, _ FF=1 109.67 -- FINISH FLOOR
ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF CUT FILL SLOPES. HA 1 0
69 PAD=1 109.0 - PAD ELEVATION
7. PROVIDE BROW DITCH DESIGNED TO HANDLE 100 YR. Q FLOWS, ALONG TOP OF CUT SLOPES.
8. FINAL COMPACTION REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL FILLS GREATER THAN ONE FOOT.
9. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY SOILS
INVESTIGATION BY CONVERSE CONSULTANTS (PROJECT NO 96-81-420-01) DATED 4-26-96 AND ALL
ADDENDA THERETO. TWO SETS OF THE FINAL COMPACTION REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY * UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WHICH SHALL INCLUDE FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS AND SEE PLAN FOR DRIVEWAY GRADE
CERTIFICATIONS THAT GRADING HAS BEEN DONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF
THE PRELIMINARY SOILS REPORT. GZN
10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, TEL. (909)694-6411 AT LEAST 24 ?
HOURS IN ADVANCE REQUESTING FINISH LOT GRADE AND DRAINAGE INSPECTION. THIS INSPECTION
MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT FINAL INSPECTION FOR EACH LOT. _ + - 1% MIN. Q �•�
11. CUT SLOPES EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT AND FILL SLOPES EQUAL TO OR + � r �z
GREATER THAN 5' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE PLANTED WITH GRASS OR GROUND COVER AS SHOWN
ON THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN TO PROTECT THE SLOPE FROM EROSION AND INSTABILITY IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 17.06 PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF FINAL INSPECTION. 4p. + •
12. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED ON EXISTING GROUND UNTIL THE GROUND HAS BEEN CLEARED OF WEEDS, + MIN. 1►
90 MIN.
DEBRIS, TOPSOIL, AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. '0� 5 PLAN 4C 2% MIN.
+ � M
�. 'r +
13. IF STEEP SLOPING TERRAIN OCCURS UPON WHICH FILL IS TO BE PLACED, IT MUST BE CLEARED, KEYED, °" P.L. PAD=1109.0
FF=1 109 9..67 67
M
AND BENCHED INTO FIRM NATURAL SOIL FOR FULL SUPPORT. PREPARATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY A �► fir_ '"
r-t�
REGISTERED SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL MATERIAL.
14. DURING ROUGH GRADING OPERATIONS AND PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT DRAINAGE �, c' +
STRUCTURES, TEMPORARY DRAINAGE CONTROL SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT PONDING WATER y0.& '• 3' GF=1 109.0
AND DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. / �' '` MIN. MIN.
+
15. DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. I z
2% MIN.
16. ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE COURSES ON THE PROJECT SITE MUST CONTINUE TO FUNCTION, ESPECIALLY // PAD 21% MAX.
DURING STORM CONDITIONS. PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS MUST / *�
BE USED TO PROTECT ADJOINING PROPERTIES DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. // �. +
17. STABILITY CALCULATIONS WITH A FACTOR OF AT LEAST ONE AND FIVE TENTH (1.5) SHALL BE // . ��� �• SWAL
SUBMITTED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR CUT AND FILL SLOPES // ,. r• E
OVER 30' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT.
18. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR SHALL SUBMIT CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING // +� + + y,lp'`r� 9 SIDEYARD LOT DETAIL TYPICAL LOT
PAD ELEVATION. WHERE SPECIFIC ELEVATIONS ARE REQUIRED, THE ELEVATION (WITH RESPECT TO MEAN / + E1.Z,C d
SEA LEVEL) SHALL BE GIVEN. IF AN ELEVATION WITH RESPECT TO ADJACENT GROUND SURFACE IS + + + .0 + N.T.S. DRAINAGE DETAIL.
REQUIRED, THE ACTUAL DISTANCE ABOVE THE ADJACENT GROUND SHALL BE GIVEN. =, to + NN.T.S.
L o � "
19. EROSION CONTROL: ALL GRADED SLOPES SHALL GABBE PLANTED WITH ROSEA ICE PLANT AT 12 ON CENTERS .n
OR ANOTHER APPROVED GROUND COVER. SLOPES OVER 15' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT, IN ADDITION TO GROUND
d
COVER, SHALL BE PLANTED WITH APPROVED TREES, SHRUBS, OR COMBINATION THEREOF. SHRUBS SHALL
BE PLANTED AT 10' ON CENTERS. SLOPES OVER 4' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL HAVE PERMANENT
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES PER U.P.C., CHAPTER 10.Rto
FINISH20. GRADE SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROM ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AT NOT LESS THAN 1/,47 PER FOOT FOR ,d► + �, s
A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET. EASEMENT FOR �O� +AD
r► $T
21. NO OBSTRUCTION OF FLOOD PLAINS OR NATURAL WATER COURSES SHALL BE PERMITTED. PUBL CSUTILIT`( ; TO oRo S . of Pp
PURPOSES �p •� J 4R • • Rro�4
22. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF + +
ANY CONSTRUCTION/GRADING. �' • �'
23. APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OR ITS AGENTS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE APPLICANT AND HIS * r► o ,� �°
ENGINEER FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED
DURING CONSTRUCTION. UPON REQUEST, THE APPROPRIATE PLAN REVISIONS SHALL BE PROMPTLY
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. PROJECT �� rERgMo
.yam � • �.� _ G o vo
24. RETAINING WALLS SHALL BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY BY THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT. +� s� SITE
25' SLOPE
22' STORM DRAIEASEMENT Wp,Y
EASEMENT �� GPN'pPNv� o� ��
30' SEWER
rn
EASEMEy
z QRIVE 0 A o 3
CONSTRUCTION NOTES �' �. �o� PPRP Z �>
o v� T �' Q QQ Q c o
Q :D `� m R0�PNS O aNp
1� INSTALL 4 U TO 3" TRANSITION SIDEWALK UNDERDRAIN PIPE z �' Q O a
PER CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARD DWG. 303. ¢ DEQ-�sA DRwE
no�� ��, `� W P� Op�gO�ANO N` N
2� INSTALL 12" X 12» DRAIN GRATE (NDS 1230 OR EQUAL)
v
3 INSTALL 4 PVC SCHEDULE 40 S�A�E �
D ( ) R�o
pDE
�P'51E
INDEX MAP '��� `"FW`�
" VICINITY MAP
FORE
BENCH MARK COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE B.M. T-29-81 BASIS OF BEARING SCALE: 1 =120
� o
Underground 2 1/2 to N.T.S.BRASS DISC IN CONC. CYLINDER LOCATED FROM THE INTERSECTION THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A PORTION o
4 Service Alert OF FRONT ST. AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, 1 .8 MILES N.E. ON RANCHO OF THE CENTERLINE OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AS OWNER/DEVELOPER:
of Southern California CALIFORNIA ROAD TO THE INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NUMBER 23432 RECORDED IN `n
Call: TOLL FREE
MARGARITA ROAD, IN THE N.W. CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION 1 ' E. OF A BOOK 159, PAGES 38 THROUGH 61 OF MAPS, RECORDS
7' CHAIN LINK FENCE, 21 'x 16' AROUND SO. CALIF. GAS VALVES, 40' N. CONTINENTAL HOMES
1 -800 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING N 22'56'23"W 12636 High Bluff Drive LDO 223 C7R
OF P.P. (NO.#) 94 N. OF THE CENTERLINE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD. 9 z
422-4133 FIBERGLASS WITNESS POST SET 1 ' W. OF MONUMENT. Suite 300 LD00-015GR
TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG ADJ. DATE 9/13/82 ELEV. 1128.410 San Diego, CA 92130
CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS DATE ACC'D BENCH MARK SEAL: PLAN SCALE
The Keith Companies CITY CSF TEMECULA N
�ESS/ wdand Empire Division AS SHOWN Drawing No.
�
fz-5 CG > ADDED AREA ORA 11V5 k PIPE QN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Contractor LOT 64 / �� RECOMMENDED BY: DATE: Z o
PROFILE SCALE o
Inspector Ned J. Am* � 22690 Cadw Aramisms 300, SuU&w V**% G 9255.3-9024 (M) X53-0234
No. Q67835 NA ACCEPTED BY: DATE: PRECISE GRADING PLANS
ate SEE ABOVE . 6-3o-02 * °
NALD J. PARKS 0
CDompleted �q� \�. Plans Prepared Under Supervision Of DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TRACT NO. 24182-4
�� CA��F� ��" .- Date 7�10�opo DRAWN BY. LD PHASE 1
a�
NED J. ARAUJO DESIGN BY. CG - LD
R.C.E. No. 057835 EXPIRATION DATE 6-30-2002 NECKED BY: C R.C.E No. 19744 Expires 9/30/01 LOTS 52 THRU 69 Skeet 1 of 2
0
0
Q
LLJ
U)
...............
------- ... z
J.
CL
-45-+oo
0
o
0
00 46+00,,
... ....... ..........
CAMPANULA WAy
goo0
L-51
0 .01 ,
L = 5 0 9
9�j L 5 0
FG S CW �� 0*"�'� --__ -- _. -- ..._ ____.. _.._._
-\?:� 9
L = 5 0 1 ,
% MIN %9
L 5 0
7W 11
9 96
U 5
0 0 0 0,
89
11 MIN ......
J MIN
1% MIN L 5 0
FL ---
4 0 0, .......
<
6
Cb
9SI I - 1% MIN CO)
sq.2 17, MIN 15 a A-9,A
92.3 bO
O. F L 6 0,
I --- 1% MIN G
91 5 < (A
N
53 9 �0
CA FL % MIN Cn Irb
1 0
; Z-T (A
r1L, 9n OD
52 0 (A 94.7
-C� 0 PLAN 1 A 6 0 tj
54 bD MIN 55 FL
0.4' PLAN 2BR
FF=1091.17 0 1-0 56, 93.9
C35.83
-A. 1 0: PLAN 3BR I \ -.3
8.01 FF=1090.47 0.4' PAD=1090.5 9 PLAN 2A �0 57 FL I
'04 DF - FF=109 1 PLAN I CR 0 95.5
'*4 5 3P %A -
0 14 FF=1092.77 FF 1093.57 0 4' 0 PLAN 3A -!�L qAr- A?
PAD=1089.8 4' .97 1 1
r UF 1 0. PAD=:109 1.,3 1110 QD Cj
ON 0
NO4 0.3, PAD=1092.1 0 4' ,: 0 58 59
�1 0. 1 0 0 0 PAD=1092.9 F FF=1094 .2' C)
-$ DF,-1 DF D .37 0.31
z 6.2* F-- I- -
D 5.0
5.09 0 PAD=1093.7 DF PLAN 2CR PLAN 18 00, 60
Z 3.11--2' 5.0, 5.1 (0:
z 5.0 z -to,
04 04 K-0-3'
Q F 88 g.Ar 5.01 - FF=1095.17o
(.0
88.8 F 89.4 m DF DF 6.0. 5.0, 0. FF=1095.97 PLAN 3C 95A 9� 13 1 - 5.OPAD=1094.,5 U PAD=1095.3
L-G8 0.,3 903 Z Op 0.3' 0� Vo I FF==10 9 6.7
:--F 1 5.
FT�vo-" 5.0 L
C3 0\1 0\1
0\4 DF .09
GF=1090-67 L PAD=109 6.1 O\t 23
2.9 GF=10 11.9 5.19 91 1 0 0.3, -7
ce CJ23
GF�109 1.4 F=1092
.27 FL
(0 0 7
5. 0.3, 2 M
C33 SO-60
o 0)0 11 Co GF=1093.07 GF-1093.87 t5 4. 30.0
10.0j,
6 OA - C? Cn 0 GF=1095 -�G 95.1 1: 20.of
0
C� L=49.81' 0 0
-9.81 P '9 L 9---7 Ft 91 GF=1094-67 .47 FL GB �O 0
L - 4 %
(0 6G.Of
RW (7)F Ab 8
L L� . d 11 - �; �0 --& F==1096-27
.d <P, Go, , I 1 0
q5
13W (-ryp)
0\1
--&cot
0 13
0.00, PD:.j 5.
50.00,
+ ov 006)
+ C�,
0 CURB FA r
(Typ) FACET r
+ 50.0
+
Un 0) N) C�
(In N (114 r- Co
S 0 a it.) 53-5o 0
OC)
Ln
Z7� S S + r
Cn
S +
(A 0 --" - I
cr)
Cn
16+0 S
+
CD On * --A
1 0 +
(n (A C-) C4 Ik
+ 17-1P S
0
0 I.
S 00
+ cri cc
18+ CD S
+ ZE S
0 0 00 0 0)
-"I Cn
CURB -FO�E�P) N�j )MI GUEVA
Q9
Ln
(TYP) "MM + DRI
VE
Cn
0
cr) 00 19+0c%� S
. 79 1 9,7 +
rj
(TyP) W CY) 0
R "YP)
W
C:) 9.% 20+0cfD
VK 0."
4' L = 3 U rt, 0)
9 +
9 rn
4 L 5 u -4 cr) C)
CF) -------
P0 03 X39 9 9 Cn
L4
1 0 a A\ CD N3
0 00 Flu 81
0,q 0\'- 10 0 is cc)
10 go r
11. 1 in
GF=1089-97 00 .4 1
:1089.57 3 : 0 F -r, cr) 9
=109 0.0
0 bo.00, >
PD PDJ tk
5.0' 00 0 89.5 .9p4L
.94 0\12 0 YJ50.0 0
10 0-2, co k--U3 0
093.17 *\4 io 00 0)
0 \0-23 1 00 C)
q DF 04 11-e
D F 1 0.2' 0 0 5.0 ;P, 0\4
0.2' 1 -> 5.0' 93.0
5.00 co '97 P-2 093.9
00 3%F===1 -77 0F
5.0 0: o\4 DF---, .-J 2 CD 0.- 9 U
8 0 F o D F 13 0 yAft ,3769 z 6 -1- 00 -- .5 F= D95.5-7 F= 096.3-7 K: 67CD FL 0
Z:
:z
5.1 z 66 DF 0 G'2
PLAN 1 CR PLAN 3A z - 0.3 CD 0.4' 0015
PLAN 1 BIR CD FL
0.2' 1 --- 09 0
FF=109 1 1 :!z 0 F-
)7 FF=1090.47 .27 go 00° PLAN 3C 6. F 13 P0 3'
DF 6.2 U 0 FF=1092-07 z FF=1092 Z 65 0,
.4 *5-0" DF PAD=1090.61 .87 1 2
DF
!P9 PAD=109 1 0. 4 J
B9- 0 >
.4 PAD=1092.2 PLAN 2BR cc
0 CJ FF=1093 DF Z 63 --- ... _j
89. -3� .6 7 92 LAN 1A
90 P I -C
%.7 6.2 PAD==1093.0 k FF=1094.47 PLAN BR 0. 62 CD
Cn ro FL /y" 3 z 61 Ot
Cn 2.,3 !qg AD=i o93.8 5.0, FF=1095-27 PLAN 2A -§'0 5.
N, P
5.01 F
0� C3,\-
ff
89 - 1< n� 0 1 - 4 0 9 93.4 PAD=1094.6 94 of FF==1096 07 OZ)0 5.0' PLAN I CR
4 0 1., - -
M� 0 - NJ > 5. FF==1096.87
-FG 49.8 1% MIN 1% MIN FL PAD=1095.4 4
4-9--. �61 7a -M IN cq� �Q 00 3.9
49-86' PAD=1096.
17o MIN 6) 6.0 2
61 0 49,86' Cn FL IG 5.7
L 95.6 9
- L=24.9 1% V I
C� FG
N 25 -70,93 M FL -FL
50.00,
q MIN 95-
G o �� s 50.00, o
.0
50.DOP 5.4 C' C?
FG 00
%K' 50.00, 17, MIN
2 0 (01
Cqb CL
O
a_
C(f
a-
GRAPHIC SCALE
O'
3.1
CONSTRUCTION NOTES IN FEET
ORE
ID Underground 20 0 10 20 40 W
Service Alert (D INSTALL e TO 3" TRANSITION SIDEWALK UNDERDRAIN PIPE
of Southern California NOTE: PER CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARD DWG. 303. Ln
SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PLANTING
Call: TOLL FREE AND DETAILS. INSTALL 12" X 12" DRAIN GRATE (NDS 1230 OR EQUAL) 1 200
1 -800 INSTALL 4- PVC SCHEDULE 40) N9 00 -223 GR z
422-4133 LD00-015GR
L0
TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG
CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS DATE ACC'D BENCH MARK SEAL: The Keith Companies PLAN SCALE 110
CITY CSF TEMECUL
ESSIA 6
Inland Empire Division 1 =20' 111117 Drawing No.
(2-16- CG ELADDED AREA DKA/N5 PIPE 0)v DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (D
RECOMMENDED BY: DATE:
Contractor Lor (04 Az PROFILE SCALE
0
C.D Ned J. Are M Codw Aww, SW. MO Ummic V**, CA 015W-024 (Wg) 6W-M34 -
Inspector No. 057835 NA ofA 04e, -1113 PRECISE GRADING PLANS
ACCEPTED BY: DATE: F - r-
Date SEE SHEET 1 hp. 6-30-02 Plans Prepared Under Supervision Of RONALD J. PARKS TRACT NO. 24182-4 (D
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Completed GF Date 7/1 /00 - DRAWN BY: LD PHASE 1 -0
NED J. ARAUjO - DESIGN BY: CG - LD No. 19744 Expires 9/30/01 Sheet 2 of 2 0
R.C.E. No. 057835 EXPIRATION DATE 6-30-2002 CHECKED BY: CG LOTS 52 THRU 69 �ov
9,
0
f5i'
[0�