HomeMy WebLinkAbout062320 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City
to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11].
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
JUNE 23, 2020 - 7:00 PM
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING
This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of
California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The
live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting
on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this Council meeting,
please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email
comments must be submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on
matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the time the item for Public Comments is called.
Email comments on agenda items must be submitted prior to the time public comments are closed on
the agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern
speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments on agenda items for this Council
meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter,
etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading
shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the
time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the
record of the Council meeting.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Pro Tempore Maryann Edwards
INVOCATION: TBD
FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Zak Schwank
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank
Page 1
City Council Agenda June 23, 2020
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that
appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three
minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes.
For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important
notice provided at the top of this agenda.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A
total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request
specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions
Recommendation
Attachments
That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically
required by the Government Code.
Agenda Report
2. Approve Action Minutes of June 9, 2020
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of June 9, 2020.
Attachments: Action Minutes
3. Approve List of Demands
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Agenda Report
Resolution
List of Demands
4. Approve City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2020
Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of
Page 2
City Council Agenda June 23, 2020
5.
April 30, 2020.
Attachments: Agenda Report
Treasurer's Report
Approve Third Amendment to Lease Agreement Between City of Temecula and Temecula
Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau DBA Visit Temecula Valley
Recommendation:
Attachments:
That the City Council approve the Third Amendment to Lease Agreement
between the City of Temecula and Visit Temecula Valley (VTV) and
authorize the Assistant City Manager to execute the amendment.
Agenda Report
Amendment
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Page 3
City Council Agenda June 23, 2020
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: President Zak Schwank
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items
that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to
three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five
minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the
important notice provided at the top of this agenda.
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community
Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
6. Approve Action Minutes of June 9, 2020
Recommendation
Attachments
That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of June 9, 2020.
Action Minutes
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, July
14, 2020, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the
Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Page 4
City Council Agenda June 23, 2020
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO
MEETING
TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
BUSINESS
7. Receive Update on Proposed Temporary Expanded Dininp-/Retail Program in Old Town
Recommendation: That the City Council receive an update on the proposed temporary
expanded dining/retail program in Old Town and provide general
direction to staff.
Attachments: Agenda Report
6/9/2020 - Agenda Report
8. Consider the Vacancv on the Citv Council and Provide Direction Re2ardin2 the Same
Recommendation: That the City Council consider the vacancy resulting from the resignation
of James Stewart and provide direction on whether to fill the vacancy by
Council appointment or election.
Attachments: Agenda Report
9. Consider the Vacancy of the Position of Mayor and Provide Direction Regarding the Same
Recommendation: That the City Council consider the vacancy of the position of Mayor and
provide direction regarding the same.
Attachments: Agenda Report
10. Consider Appointments to 2020 City Council Committees
Recommendation: That the City Council appoint members to serve on existing City Council
Committees for the balance of calendar year 2020 and evaluate the need
for an additional committee.
Attachments: Agenda Report
2020 Council Committee Assignments
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
11. Community Development Department Monthly Report
Page 5
City Council Agenda June 23, 2020
Attachments: Agenda Report
Planning Activity Report
Statistics
Charts
12. Fire Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
Fire Report
13. Police Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
14. Public Works Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
Project Status Report
COMMISSION REPORTS
PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, July 14, 2020, at 5:30 p.m., for a
Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at
41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material
available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any
item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center
during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the
City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions
regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444.
Page 6
Item No. 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the
Government Code.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of
the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to
the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of
the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: None
Item No. 2
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
JUNE 9, 2020 - 7:00 PM
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING
This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of
California Executive Order N 29 20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID 19 pandemic. The
live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N 29 20, the public may only view the meeting
on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this Council meeting,
please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email
comments must be submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on
matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the time the Mayor calls the item for Public
Comments. Email comments on agenda items must be submitted prior to the time the Mayor closes
public comments on the agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would
otherwise govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments on agenda items for
this Council meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media
(Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading
shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the
time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the
record of the Council meeting.
CALL TO ORDER at 7:00 PM: Mayor Pro Tempore Maryann Edwards
INVOCATION: Aaron Adams
FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Rahn
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following individuals submitted an electronic comment on non-agendized items:
• Kristiana Ruiz
• Stephanie Tabares
• Jessica Ward
• Christopher Bout
• Eva Smith
• Ana L. Moreno
• Gia Rueda
• Courtney Sheehan
• Israel Mazariegos
• Charity Barczyszyn
• Savannah McLaughlin
0 Karen Wilson-Bonnar
• Saman Arzo
• Allen Kugi
• Amber Sosa
• Frederick Ricky Denham Il
• Alyssa Garcia
• Rain Rosilez
• Judy C. Torres
• Karleigh Shepard
• Victoria Serrano
• Ginger Hitzke
• Sarah Velotta
• Abram Cerda
• Mia Michael
• Annabelle Flectcher
• Delainey Pack
• Mackenzie Orr
• Emily Kim
• Gabriella Waltz
• Chris Mitchell
• Nicolo Villasis
• Kirk Lentz
• Jonathan Chang
• Emily Carian
• Laurel LaMont
• Sherry Bondy
• Riley Wold
• S. Fairchild
• Abraham Tehrani
• Kathryn Wright
• Teresa Dugan Mansfield
• Sally Price
• Ashley Clingingsmith
• Reina Diaz
• Tim McDonald
• Tami Sims
• Frederic Ball
• Nathan Price
• Ira L. Robinson
• Chris Smith
• Leanne Gaffney
• Sarah Payton
• Alicia Rosenthal
• Anonymous
• Ronald L. Prentice
• Shire
The following individuals submitted an electronic comment on agendized items:
• Al Rubio (11) • Cherise Manning (11)
• Kim Kelliher (11) • Brian Connors (11)
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected
unanimous approval.
1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions
Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically
required by the Government Code.
2. Approve Action Minutes of May 21 and May 26, 2020
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of May 21 and May
26, 2020.
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
Approve List of Demands
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Adopt Ordinance 2020-06 Amending Chapter 17.21 Affordable Housing Overlay Zone of the
Temecula Municipal Code (Long Range Project No. LR20-0279) (Second Readingl
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO.2020-06
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 17.21 REGARDING
THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVERLAY ZONE, AND MAKING
THE DETERMINATION THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS
EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(3)
Adopt Resolution Reaffirming and Proclaiming the Existence of a Local Emergency Related to
the COVID-19 Virus Pandemic
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REAFFIRMING AND PROCLAIMING THE
EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATING TO THE
COVID-19 VIRUS PANDEMIC AND ISSUING CERTAIN ORDERS
FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY AFFAIRS DURING THE LOCAL
EMERGENCY
Adopt Resolutions Regarding the November 3, 2020 General Municipal Election
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the following resolutions regarding the
November 3, 2020 General Municipal Election:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-36
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING
3
OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2020, FOR THE ELECTION OF
CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO
GENERAL LAW CITIES
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 3, 2020 WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION
10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR
ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES
STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION
TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2020
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA PROVIDING FOR THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL
RUNOFF ELECTION FOR ELECTIVE OFFICES IN THE EVENT OF
A TIE VOTE AT ANY MUNICIPAL ELECTION
7. Receive and File the 2019 General Plan Annual Progress Report
Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the 2019 General Plan Annual
Progress Report (GPAPR).
RECESS:
At 8:37 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District
Meeting. At 8:40 PM, the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda.
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL / COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
9. Approve Update to the 2017-22 Citizen Participation Plan and Substantial Amendment to the
2019-20 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt resolutions entitled:
4
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA TO ADOPT AN UPDATED CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
PLAN SETTING THE CITY'S POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK PROGRAM (CDBG) FIVE-YEAR
CONSOLIDATED PLAN, ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING,
ANNUAL ACTION PLANS, ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS,
SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENTS, AND DISASTER RECOVERY
AND SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO
THE 2019-20 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Naggar, Second by Schwank. The vote
reflected unanimous approval.
10. Approve Fiscal Years 2021-25 Capital Improvement Program . (CIP) and Adopt Fiscal Year
2020-21 CIP and Annual Operating Budgets for the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community
Services District (TCSD) and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment A.gency_(SARDA)
Recommendation: That the City Council/Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2021-25 AND ADOPTING THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2020-21
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2020-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET, ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON
CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS, ESTABLISHING CONTRACT
AUTHORITY OF THE GENERAL MANAGER, ESTABLISHING
LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY OF THE GENERAL
MANAGER
5
RESOLUTION NO. SARDA 2020-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2021-25, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
2020-21, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON
CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET, ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON
CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS, ESTABLISHING CONTRACT
AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER, ESTABLISHING LAWSUIT
SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED
POSITIONS AND SALARY SCHEDULE
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-45
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote
reflected unanimous approval.
BUSINESS
11. Provide General Direction to Staff on a Proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail Program
in Old Town
Recommendation: That the City Council provide general direction to staff on whether to
proceed with a proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail Program in
Old Town.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote
reflected unanimous approval.
COMMISSION REPORTS
c
PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:58 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 23, 2020, at 5:30 PM
for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main
Street, Temecula, California.
Adjourned in memory of
George Floyd
Maryann Edwards, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Item No. 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve List of Demands
PREPARED BY: Jada Shafe, Accounting Technician II
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review
and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached
claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or
authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies
and procedures.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution
2. List of Demands
RESOLUTION NO.2020-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in
the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are
hereby allowed in the amount of $1,808,179.02.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 23rd day of June, 2020.
Maryann Edwards, Mayor Pro Tempore
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of June, 2020, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
05/28/2020 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
06/04/2020 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/28/2020 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
06/04/2020 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
505,076.46
659,475.86
466,096.37
177,530.33
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 6/23/2020 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 1,808,179.02
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
001
GENERAL FUND $
560,152.04
125
PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT
455.50
140
COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
6,527.46
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
5,393.12
190
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
108,247.06
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS
251.68
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING
3,432.37
195
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R STREET ROAD MAINTENANCE
2,500.00
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
11,515.59
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
3,727.25
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND
256,884.50
300
INSURANCE FUND
1,120.71
305
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
746.25
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
52,367.63
330
CENTRAL SERVICES
2,812.44
340
FACILITIES
52,202.52
472
CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE
117.51
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNS HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
117.61
474
AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
117.61
475
CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
133.22
476
CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND
117.61
477
CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND
148.85
478
CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II
117.61
501
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD
2,799.93
502
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK
2,005.89
503
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAND
1,792.05
504
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS
380.76
505
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES
2,181.86
506
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY
1,236.13
507
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW
875.49
508
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE
8,205.50
509
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA
183.52
510
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE
544.66
511
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW
116.69
512
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS
5,114.86
513
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP
1,244.08
514
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES
854.78
515
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATE
564.41
516
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS
1,715.05
517
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA
111.57
518
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS
7,100.92
519
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR
3,897.88
520
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL
12,888.88
521
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH
21,906.25
522
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE
240.46
523
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
299.00
524
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON
7,055.68
525
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS
2,424.07
526
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION
127.89
527
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE
321.59
528
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK
8,986.94
529
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT
169.39
$ 1,164,552.32
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 437,996.50
140
COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
1,258.43
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
8,705.48
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
121,397.86
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS
500.12
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING
2,418.02
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
374.54
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
2,655.02
300
INSURANCE FUND
1,871.39
305
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
1,590.06
320
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
49,038.90
330
CENTRAL SERVICES
5,181.78
340
FACILITIES
8,266.18
472
CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE
232.76
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
232.64
474
AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
232.64
475
CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
288.46
476
CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND
232.64
477
CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND
344.30
478
CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II
232.64
501
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD
0.01
502
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREI
0.89
503
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAN
0.02
504
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS
0.17
505
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES
0.89
506
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUP
0.46
507
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW
0.89
508
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE
96.69
509
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA
0.05
510
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE
0.36
511
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW
0.08
512
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS
147.75
513
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELC
0.89
514
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOME
0.28
515
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATE
0.25
516
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS
1.05
517
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA
0.02
518
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS
3.90
519
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR
2.08
520
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL
92.23
521
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH
95.71
522
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE
0.13
523
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
0.27
524
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON
62.78
525
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS
1.73
526
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADIT]
0.04
527
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE
0.27
528
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK
66.32
529
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRJ
0.13
TOTAL BY FUND:
643,626.70
$ 1,808,179.02
apChkLst
05/28/2020
12:18:21PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 1
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
8818
5/22/2020
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER
VARI APR WATER 3026656 31367 LA
11,667.70
11,667.70
DISTRICT
SERENA
8819
5/28/2020
010349
CALIF DEPT OF CHILD
SUPPORT PAYMENT
899.07
899.07
SUPPORT
8820
5/28/2020
021301
ICMARETIREMENT-PLAN
ICMA-401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN
1,134.62
1,134.62
106474
PAYMENT
8821
5/28/2020
000194
I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN
ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457
13,581.25
13,581.25
303355
PAYMENT
8822
5/28/2020
000444
INSTATAX (EDD)
STATE TAXES PAYMENT
24,818.87
24,818.87
8823
5/28/2020
000283
INSTATAX (IRS)
FEDERAL TAXES PAYMENT
84,026.43
84,026.43
8824
5/28/2020
001065
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT
10,959.93
10,959.93
SOLUTION
8825
5/28/2020
019088
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT
28.51
28.51
SOLUTION
PAYMENT
8826
5/28/2020
000389
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT
615.14
615.14
SOLUTION
PAYMENT
8827
5/28/2020
000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES'
PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT
107,116.82
107,116.82
RETIREMENT)
8828
5/18/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-30-066-2889 30051 RANCHO CAL
12.78
12.78
8829
5/18/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-40-765-3021 28916 PUJOL ST
32.27
32.27
8830
5/18/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-40-765-3179 28922 PUJOL ST
80.18
80.18
8831
5/18/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-29-974-7899 26953 YNEZ RD
162.76
162.76
8832
5/18/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-30-608-9384 28582 HARVESTON
289.62
289.62
DR
8833
5/18/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-02-351-5281 30875 RANCHO
2,733.29
2,733.29
VISTA RD
Page:1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
O5/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
8834
5/18/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-05-791-8807 31587 TEM PKWY
8836
5/19/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-29-223-9571 30395 MURRIETA
HOT SPR
8837
5/19/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-31-419-2659 26706 YNEZ RD
8838
5/19/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-28-171-2620 40820
WINCHESTER RD
8841
5/20/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 32131 S LOOP
RD
8842
5/20/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST
8843
5/20/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 28816 PUJOL ST
8844
5/26/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 42569
MARGARITA RD
8845
5/26/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 30875 RANCHO
VISTA RD
8846
5/26/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 30600 PAUBA
RD
8847
5/20/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAY INTERNET SVCS- LIBRARY
8848
5/20/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAY INTERNET SVCS- LIBRARY
8849
5/22/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAY INTERNET SVCS- EXTERNAL DMV
LINE
8850
5/22/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAY INTERNET SVCS- CHILDREN'S
MUSEUM
8851
5/26/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
APR WATER 32131 S LOOP RD
DIST
8852
5/26/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
APR WATER 32131 S LOOP RD
DIST
8853
5/26/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
APR WATER 31991 RORIPAUGH
DIST
VALLEY RD
Amount Paid Check Total
8,809.03
8,809.03
11.92
11.92
144.97
144.97
545.93
545.93
237.21
237.21
282.12
282.12
586.83
586.83
586.83
586.83
586.83
586.83
598.03
598.03
5.31
5.31
5.31
5.31
111.84
111.84
130.98
130.98
53.79
53.79
95.28
95.28
98.48
98.48
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
05/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
8854
5/26/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
APR WATER 39656 DIEGO DR
DIST
8855
5/26/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
APR WATER 32131 S LOOP RD
DIST
8856
5/26/2020
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
APR WATER 31991 RORIPAUGH
DIST
VALLEY RD
8857
5/22/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
APR 091-085-1632-041951 MORAGARD
8858
5/22/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-33-237-4818 30499 RANCHO CAL
8859
5/26/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-29-974-7568 26953 YNEZ RD
8860
5/26/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-31-693-9784 26036 YNEZ RD
8861
5/22/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-26-887-0789 40233 VILLAGE RD
8862
5/22/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-00-397-5059 33340 CAMINO
PIEDRA
201618
5/28/2020
019075
ADORAMA INC
MISC A/V PROD. EQUIP: PEG
SUPPLIES
201619
5/28/2020
021830
ALL AMERICAN FIRE SYSTEMS
REFUND: PERMIT F19-4226
CONTRACTOR
201620
5/28/2020
013015
ALWAYS RELIABLE
BACKFLOW TESTING SVC: MEADOWS
BACKFLOW, AKA NANETTE
PKWY
SEMAN
201621
5/28/2020
007282
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: BC
INC
MPSC FACILITY SUPPLIES/EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES:HUMAN SVCS PRGRMS TCSE
SUPPLIES:TVM EVENTS & EXHIBITS
COVID-19 SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
SMALLTOOLS -PREV
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: COVID-19
201622
5/28/2020
004240
AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES
PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF
AFN
Amount Paid Check Total
124.53
124.53
207.74
207.74
761.37
761.37
395.13
395.13
108.34
108.34
109.48
109.48
364.21
364.21
1,849.46
1,849.46
3,927.32
3,927.32
455.50
455.50
223.00
223.00
27.00
27.00
610.71
506.74
235.19
203.51
108.92
67.96
35.88
32.60
28.99 1,830.50
340.50 340.50
Page:3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
O5/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201623
5/28/2020
021689
ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC
CEQAANALYSIS: ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY
201624
5/28/2020
011666
B P S TACTICAL INC
TACTICAL BALLISTIC VEST COVER:
POPTEAM
201625
5/28/2020
011348
BONCOR WATER SYSTEMS
MAY WTR TANK FILTER REPL: STA 73
LLC, DBA SUNSHINE WATER
SOFT
201626
5/28/2020
008013
BOSTRE-LE, ANNIE
COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM:
BOSTRE-LE, A.
201627
5/28/2020
004971
CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
MAY 11 CANON COPIERS LEASE:
INC
LIBRARY
201628
5/28/2020
018828
CASC ENGINEERING AND,
APR MISC ENG SVCS: WQMP/PLAN CK
CONSULTING INC
SVCS
ENG/GIS SVCS:CATCH BASIN DEVICE At
ENG SVCS:BTRFLD STG RD PH III, PW1E
MISC ENG SVCS: WATER CONVERSION
MAR WQMP PLAN CK - PW13-09 TPL
201629
5/28/2020
020025
CIVIL SOURCE INC
MAR ENG SVCS: BUTTERFIELD STG,
PW15-11
MAR ENG SVCS: BUTTERFIELD STG, PVA
MAR PROF SVCS:LIBRARY PRKG PH IIIJ
201630
5/28/2020
004405
COMMUNITY HEALTH
EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS
CHARITIES
PAYMENT
201631
5/28/2020
021230
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
DISTR, DBA CALIF ELECTRIC
SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
201632
5/28/2020
004329
COSTCO TEMECULA 491
MISC SUPPLIES - MPSC
201633
5/28/2020
017038
CPS HR CONSULTING
EMPLOYEE TRAINING 11/13/19-HR
201634
5/28/2020
010650
CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING &
KITCHEN REPAIR - STAT 73
HVAC INC
201635
5/28/2020
019325
CROWELL, PAULA
COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM:
CROWELL, P.
201636
5/28/2020
012600
DAVID EVANS AND
MAR DSGN SVCS: TPL PARKING PH II
ASSOCIATES INC
PW13-09
Amount Paid Check Total
3,791.00
3,791.00
600.30
600.30
279.96
279.96
1,872.33
1,872.33
671.56
671.56
8,875.50
7,646.50
4,640.18
4,266.00
572.99
26,001.17
17,128.75
14,490.00
5,800.00
37,418.75
4.00
4.00
736.51
598.13
297.43
108.75
1,740.82
1,298.62
1,298.62
1,000.00
1,000.00
642.71
642.71
2,000.00
2,000.00
5,220.00
5,220.00
Page:4
apChkLst
05/28/2020
12:18:21PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 5
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201637
5/28/2020
004192
DOWNS ENERGY FUEL
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD
126.79
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT
101.71
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV
69.62
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT
879.04
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI
824.99
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PW CIP
233.68
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC DIV
228.66
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE
178.53
2,643.02
201638
5/28/2020
002577
ENGINEERING RESOURCES
APR ENG SVCS: OVERLAND DR:
11,582.00
PW16-06
APR ENG SVCS: SIDEWALK: 5TH ST: PW
5,045.00
16,627.00
201639
5/28/2020
000165
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
4/22-4/30 EXP MAIL SVCS: FIRE
103.04
103.04
201640
5/28/2020
021831
GARRISON, JANET
REFUND: CRC KITCKEN RENTAL6/19 &
1,265.00
1,265.00
6/20
201641
5/28/2020
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES:BLDG & SAFETY
163.06
INC
OFC SUPPLIES -PLANNING
104.02
OFC SUPPLIES -PLANNING
17.18
OFFICE SUPPLIES:BLDG & SAFETY
13.14
297.40
201642
5/28/2020
003792
GRAINGER
MISC SAFETY SUPPLIES PW PARKS
54.70
54.70
201643
5/28/2020
002109
HD SUPPLY CONSTR. SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
1,033.33
LTD, DBA HDS WHITE CAP
CONST
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
855.95
1,889.28
201644
5/28/2020
020420
HOWE, HUNTER
COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM: HOWE,
2,000.00
2,000.00
H.
201645
5/28/2020
003571
INTLASSN OF PLUMBING AND,
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:CLEMENTS,
300.00
300.00
MECHANICAL OFFICIAL-IAPMO
B. 91674
201646
5/28/2020
021180
INTUIPLAN LLC, DBA JOLT
SFTWR RENEWAL:CRC STAFF
2,159.76
2,159.76
SCHEDULING
201647
5/28/2020
000482
LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC
1/17-3/31 GEOTECH:BTRFLD PH3,
32,047.15
PW15-11
APR GEOTECH SVC:BTRFLD STG,PW15-
8,383.20
REVIEW:PROPOSED CONGREGATE HO(
2,200.00
42,630.35
201648
5/28/2020
021828
MAGNUM REALTY GROUP INC,
HOMELESS PREV PRGM: SANTOYO
1,395.00
1,395.00
MANAGEMENT ONE
PROFESSION
Pages
apChkLst
05/28/2020
12:18:21PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 6
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201649
5/28/2020
003782
MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA
MISC SIGNAGE:PW PARKS
1,293.00
ATHACO INC
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP
1,147.21
MISC SIGNAGE:PW PARKS
964.36
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP
779.84
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP
484.39
4,668.80
201650
5/28/2020
018675
MDG ASSOCIATES INC
APR CDBG ADMIN SVCS
4,425.00
APR LABOR COMPLIANCE MONITORING
166.25
4,591.25
201651
5/28/2020
013827
MIKO MOUNTAINLION INC
LIEFER ROAD REGRADE
2,500.00
2,500.00
201652
5/28/2020
004043
MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CRC
453.14
INC
MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PW PARK,
99.80
552.94
201653
5/28/2020
016883
MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT,
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:
90.00
90.00
ASSOCIATION OF SO CALIF
KELLY-LEHNER, L.
201654
5/28/2020
003663
PECHANGA BAND OF
FEB CULTURAL
1,279.25
1,279.25
LUISENO, MISSION INDIANS
MONITOR: F.V.PKWY/1-1 5,PH. 11
201655
5/28/2020
018462
PERDUE ROBERT S DBA,
APPRAISAL SRVCS:PLNG DEPT
8,000.00
8,000.00
PERDUE RUSSELL & MATTHIES
201656
5/28/2020
012904
PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN
APR PLAN REVIEW SRVCS:FIRE PREV
1,081.50
1,081.50
AND, CONSULTING
201657
5/28/2020
008605
PSOMAS
3/27-4/23 CONSULT SRVC:PECH
6,100.00
6,100.00
PKWY,11-01
201658
5/28/2020
001365
RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF,
RENEW PERMIT:SAM HICKS PRK
146.00
146.00
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
SNACK BAR
DEPT
201659
5/28/2020
004274
SAFE AND SECURE
LOCKSMITH SRVCS:CIVIC CENTER
35.23
35.23
LOCKSMITH SRVC
201660
5/28/2020
021829
SIMON LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE
EXEC STAFF LEADERSHIP TRNG 3/5/20
4,000.00
4,000.00
INC, THE
201661
5/28/2020
000645
SMART AND FINAL INC
MISC SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES
184.74
184.74
PRGM
201662
5/28/2020
002503
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY,
FY19/20 AQMD FEE:FOC
137.63
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
FY19/20 AQMD FEE:CIVIC CENTER
137.63
FY19/20AQMD FEE:LIBRARY
137.63
412.89
201663
5/28/2020
003000
STATE WATER RESOURCE
STORM WATER PERM IT1-15/SR-79S
1,492.00
1,492.00
CONTROL, BOARD
Page.-6
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
05/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Description
Amount Paid Check Total
201664
5/28/2020
017814
STC TRAFFIC INC
APR FIBER OPTIC COMM SYS UPGRD,
13,770.00
PW18-05
APR TRAF SGNL SYS UPGRADE:HSIP C)
195.00
201665
5/28/2020
013387
SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC
MAY SWEEPING SVCS: PRKG
540.00
STRUCTURE
201666
5/28/2020
006529
TEMECULA VALLEY GARDEN
REFUND: CC RENTAL CANCELLED
200.00
CLUB
6/9/20
201667
5/28/2020
020967
TESLA ENERGY
REFUND: PERMIT B20-0747
126.72
CANCELLED
201668
5/28/2020
003487
VETERANS OF FOREIGN
FY19/20 COMMUNITY SERVICE
4,784.00
WARS 4089
FUNDING
201669
5/28/2020
008668
WES FLOWERS
SUNSHINE FUND
61.43
201670
5/28/2020
000621
WESTERN RIVERSIDE
AGRMNT PMT:STREETLIGHT
13,099.93
COUNCIL OF, GOVERNMENTS
IMPLEMENTATION
(WRCOG)
201671
5/28/2020
004567
WITCHER ELECTRIC, AKA
ELECTRICAL SRVCS:PUMP TRACK,
1,485.00
TERRENCE KEVIN WITCHE
PW18-04
Grand total
for UNION BANK:
13, 965.00
540.00
200.00
126.72
4,784.00
61.43
13,099.93
1,485.00
505,076.46
Page-7
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
O5/28/2020 12:18:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA
96 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 505,076.46
Page:8
apChkLst
06/04/2020
9:09:02AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 1
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
8864
5/29/2020
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER
VARI APR WATER 3001040 SPORTS
19,939.92
19,939.92
DISTRICT
PARK
8865
5/29/2020
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
APR 015-575-0195-2 32211 WOLF
144.00
144.00
VALLEY RD
8866
5/27/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST
46.48
46.48
8867
5/29/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 41845 6TH ST
586.83
586.83
8868
5/29/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 28922 PUJOL ST
586.83
586.83
8869
5/28/2020
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
MAY INTERNET SVCS- 32380 DEER
586.83
586.83
HOLLOW WAY
8870
6/1/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAY INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
5,340.56
5,340.56
8871
6/1/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAY INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
2,695.70
2,695.70
8872
6/1/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAY INTERNET SVCS- MPSC
150.98
150.98
8873
5/28/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAY INTERNET SVCS- MPSC
194.92
194.92
8874
5/28/2020
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
MAY INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
295.98
295.98
8875
6/4/2020
000444
INSTATAX (EDD)
STATE TAXES PAYMENT
14,657.33
14,657.33
8876
6/4/2020
000283
INSTATAX (IRS)
FEDERAL TAXES PAYMENT
43,438.15
43,438.15
8877
5/26/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-30-099-3847 29721 RYECREST
11.74
11.74
8878
5/29/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
APR 2-30-296-9522 46679 PRIMROSE
25.82
25.82
AVE
8879
5/29/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-28-331-4847 32805 PAUBA RD
74.60
74.60
8880
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-34-624-4452 32131 S LOOP RD
1,337.48
1,337.48
Page-1
apChkLst
06/04/2020
9:09:02AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 2
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
8881
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-33-357-5785 44747 REDHAWK
24.14
24.14
PKWY
8882
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-41-072-5394 29429 TEM PKWY
57.55
57.55
8883
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-40-576-0232 44173
14.72
14.72
BUTTERFIELD STG
8884
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-35-164-3515 32932 LEENA WAY
12.01
12.01
8885
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-35-164-3663 42335 MEADOWS
12.01
12.01
PKWY
8886
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-35-164-3242 44270 MEADOWS
11.78
11.78
PKWY
8887
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-35-164-3770 43487
13.36
13.36
BUTTERFIELD STG
8888
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-29-933-3831 43230 BUS PK DR
2,225.46
2,225.46
8889
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-21-981-4720 30153 TEM PKWY
15.76
15.76
8890
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 241-072-5246 29429 TEM PKWY
36.30
36.30
8891
6/1/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-28-904-7706 32329 OVERLAND
132.60
132.60
TRL
8892
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-35-421-1260 41955 4TH ST
11.44
11.44
8893
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-31-419-2873 43000 HWY 395
11.74
11.74
8894
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-29-657-2787 41638
11.74
11.74
WINCHESTER RD
8895
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-34-333-3589 41702 MAIN ST
11.88
11.88
8896
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-29-807-1226 28077 DIAZ RD
12.15
12.15
8897
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
MAY 2-29-807-1093 28079 DIAZ RD
12.15
12.15
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
06/04/2020 9:09:02AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
8898
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8899
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8900
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8901
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8902
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8903
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8904
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8905
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8906
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8907
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8908
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8909
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8910
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
8911
6/2/2020
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
201615
5/27/2020
000418
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
RECORDER
201616
5/27/2020
000418
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
RECORDER
201617
5/27/2020
000418
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
RECORDER
(Continued)
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
MAY 2-31-031-2616 27991 DIAZ RD
12.58
12.58
MAY 2-31-282-0665 27407 DIAZ RD
12.69
12.69
MAY 2-41-502-0478 28402 MERCEDES
23.29
23.29
ST
MAY 2-14-204-1615 30027 FRONT ST
23.53
23.53
MAY 2-31-536-3481 41902 MAIN ST
120.52
120.52
MAY 2-19-171-8568 28300 MERCEDES
157.47
157.47
ST
MAY 2-02-502-8077 43210 BUS PK DR
273.57
273.57
MAY 2-18-937-3152 28314 MERCEDES
474.63
474.63
ST
MAY 2-02-351-4946 41845 6TH ST
728.34
728.34
MAY 2-31-912-7494 28690 MERCEDES
878.01
878.01
ST
MAY 2-31-536-3655 41904 MAIN ST
1,326.06
1,326.06
MAY 2-29-224-0173 32364 OVERLAND
1,993.35
1,993.35
TRL
MAY 2-00-397-5042 43200 BUS PK DR
3,354.17
3,354.17
MAY 2-32-903-8293 41000 MAIN ST
16,779.48
16,779.48
NOE FEE:LR20-0209 OLD TOWN SPA
50.00
50.00
NOE FEE:LR18-1506 (CEQA
50.00
50.00
TRANSPORT)
NOE FEE:LR20-0279 AFFORDABLE
50.00
50.00
HOUSING
Page.-3
apChkLst
06/04/2020
9:09:02AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 4
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201672
6/4/2020
002786
4N6XPRT SYSTEMS
FORENSIC SOFTWARE
250.00
250.00
UPDATE:POLICE
201673
6/4/2020
004802
ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL
K-9 EQUIPMENT: TEMECULA PD
46.33
LLC
MAY K9 TRAINING: DAYKA/BORIS: POLIC
350.00
396.33
201674
6/4/2020
003951
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
212.33
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
259.06
471.39
201675
6/4/2020
013950
AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO
MAY DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT:
56.57
56.57
POLICE SW ST
201676
6/4/2020
004623
AQUA SOURCE INC
POOL TESTING SUPPLIES: AQUATICS
980.98
980.98
201677
6/4/2020
003691
ATS INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS
SOFTWARE RENEWAL FOR
2,888.96
2,888.96
INC, DBATRAFFICWARE LLC
TRAFFIC:PW
201678
6/4/2020
004262
BIO TOX LABORATORIES
PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF
1,241.00
PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF
507.00
1,748.00
201679
6/4/2020
018408
BOB CALLAHAN'S POOL
MAY POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT: VAR
950.00
SERVICE
FACS
MAY POOLS & FOUNTAINS MAINT: VAR F
1,100.00
2,050.00
201680
6/4/2020
021588
BRAUN PETER, DBA
JUN PLANTSCAPE SVCS: CIVIC CTR
500.00
TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE
JUN PLANTSCAPE SVCS: TPL
200.00
700.00
201681
6/4/2020
004248
CALIF DEPT OF
APR BLOOD & ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:
175.00
175.00
JUSTICE-ACCTING
TEM SHERIF
201682
6/4/2020
004241
CALIF DEPT OF STATE
REMITTANCE OF AB1379 - QE MAR
1,596.40
1,596.40
ARCHITECT
2020
201683
6/4/2020
001610
CALTRANS, DEPT OF
COOPAGMNT 1515/A-1;CITYAGMNT
71.45
71.45
TRANSPORTATION
12-025
201684
6/4/2020
004462
CDW LLC, DBA CDW
IT EQUIPM - STA 92
178.12
GOVERNMENT LLC
MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO TECF
2,169.80
IT EQUIPM - STA 92
2,998.70
RACK ENCLOSURE:CRC PD SUBSTATIOI
97.89
5,444.51
201685
6/4/2020
021230
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CRC
1,169.06
1,169.06
DISTR, DBA CALIF ELECTRIC
SUPPLY
201686
6/4/2020
017038
CPS HR CONSULTING
MID-MGMT LEADERSHIP TRNG
1,200.00
11/13/19-HR
PRODUCTIVE TEAMS TIRING 11/6/19-HR
4,450.00
5,650.00
Page:4
apChkLst
06/04/2020
9:09:02AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 5
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201687
6/4/2020
010650
CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING &
PLUMBING SVCS: FIRE STA 84
691.34
HVAC INC
MISC PLUMBING SVCS: VAR PARKS
1,028.48
INSTALL COUNTERTOPS: PD STOREFRC
5,800.00
7,519.82
201688
6/4/2020
016098
CULTIVATING GOOD INC, DBA
RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT
9,711.28
9,711.28
EAT MARKETPLACE
201689
6/4/2020
012600
DAVID EVANS AND
APR DSGN SVCS: DLR SIDEWALKS.
2,032.00
ASSOCIATES INC
PW19-18
APR DSGN SVCS: DIAZ RD PROJ PW17-:
28,752.37
30,784.37
201690
6/4/2020
002990
DAVID TURCH AND
JUN FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY
5,500.00
5,500.00
ASSOCIATES
MGR
201691
6/4/2020
021835
DID WHOLESALE DIST
REFUND: VIOLATION DISMISSAL
305.00
305.00
#322455
201692
6/4/2020
008943
DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES
MASSAGE APPEAL SVCS: AMAZING
2,625.00
2,625.00
(DGS)
MASSAGE
201693
6/4/2020
003945
DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL
PORTABLE TOILET SVCS: CORONA
124.97
SRVCS
VIRUS: PD
TEMPORARY FENCING: JRC
95.00
219.97
201694
6/4/2020
019720
DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES
MAY WTR QUALITY MAINT:DUCK
6,969.00
6,969.00
INC
PND/HARV.
201695
6/4/2020
004192
DOWNS ENERGY FUEL
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV
131.49
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI
31.46
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE
128.55
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI
588.24
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PW CIP
90.82
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC
205.39
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD
304.46
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT
126.29
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT
697.66
2,304.36
201696
6/4/2020
021836
DRENK, DANYELLE
REFUND: VIOLATION DISMISSAL
70.00
70.00
#340513
201697
6/4/2020
020904
ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVES INC
CONDENSER H2O SYSTEM MAINT:
196.11
196.11
CRC
201698
6/4/2020
002577
ENGINEERING RESOURCES
APR ENG SVCS: BIKE TRAIL PGM:
13,286.00
13,286.00
PW19-11
201699
6/4/2020
000164
ESGIL LLC
FEB PLAN CK SVCS: BLDG & SAFETY
10,996.74
10,996.74
Page:5
apChkLst
O6/04/2020
9:09:02AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 6
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201700
6/4/2020
001056
EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC
IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS
2,112.60
LOCATIONS
IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VAR SLOPES
1,686.52
MAY LDSCP MAINT: MEDIANS
21,133.27
MAY LDSCP MAINT SLOPES: PW
24,635.75
MULCH: CROWN HILL SLOPE
2,790.00
MAY LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS PV
58,921.01
MAY LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS PN
57,870.52
MAY LDSCP MAINT SLOPES: PW
40,615.26
MAY OVERLAND EXTENSION PROJ LDS(
300.00
210,064.93
201701
6/4/2020
015330
FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, OF
APR CDBG SUB -RECIPIENT: FAIR
1,490.66
1,490.66
RIVERSIDE COUNTY INC
HOUSING SVC
201702
6/4/2020
010804
FEHR AND PEERS
APR CEQA TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
19,030.80
19,030.80
UPDATE -VMT
201703
6/4/2020
009097
FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS
SOUND/LIGHTING & MISC SUPPLIES:
713.33
713.33
THEATER
201704
6/4/2020
017866
GARDEN STATE FIREWORKS
DEPOSIT/FIREWORKS DISPLAYATH
19,250.00
19,250.00
INC
OF JULY
201705
6/4/2020
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFC SUPPLIES: INFO TECH
29.79
INC
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CENTRAL SVCS
23.32
OFC SUPPLIES: CRC
93.25
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
59.76
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION FIRE
55.20
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 73
88.45
MISC OFC SUPPIES: COVID 19
63.62
OFC SUPPLIES:BLDG & SAFETY
63.62
477.01
201706
6/4/2020
004890
GOLDEN STATE FIRE
Sprinkler/Standpipe Inspection: Garage
6,400.00
6,400.00
PROTECTION
Page.-6
apChkLst
O6/04/2020
9:09:02AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 7
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201707
6/4/2020
000186
HANKS HARDWARE INC
MISC HDWR SUPPLIES: CODE
130.65
ENFORCEMENT
HARDWARE SUPPLIES: VARI FIRE STATI
1,151.67
MAINT SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS
641.86
MISC SUPPLIES: HARVESTON LAKE PAF
129.61
MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS
1,166.29
MAINT SUPPLIES: TCC
2.89
MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI DEPTS
127.68
MAINT SUPPLIES: LIBRARY
299.07
MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI DEPTS
3,405.20
MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI DEPTS
1,579.34
MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC
318.76
MAINT SUPPLIES: THEATER
8.99
MISC SUPPLIES FOR PW STREET MAINI
289.84
MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: PW - TRAI
251.55
9,503.40
201708
6/4/2020
012748
HARDYAND HARPER INC
PARKING LOT PAVING: CRC
16,072.50
16,072.50
201709
6/4/2020
020628
HASA INC
VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATIC
742.81
742.81
FACILITIES
201710
6/4/2020
002109
HD SUPPLY CONSTR. SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
699.22
699.22
LTD, DBA HDS WHITE CAP
CONST
201711
6/4/2020
013749
HELIXSTORM INC
FIREWALL ANNUAL SUB RENEWAL:
1,261.81
1,261.81
INFO TECH
201712
6/4/2020
003198
HOME DEPOT
MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER
1,783.27
1,783.27
201713
6/4/2020
012285
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: CRC
456.75
MISC SUPPLIES: CRC
59.81
516.56
201714
6/4/2020
001091
KEYSER MARSTON
FEB FISCAL IMPACT
1,138.75
ASSOCIATES INC
ANALYSIS: HElRLOOM
JAN REAL ESTATE CONSULT: AFFORDAE
566.02
1,704.77
201715
6/4/2020
004905
LIEBERT, CASSIDYAND
APR HR LEGAL SVCS FOR
342.00
342.00
W H ITMORE
TE060-00001
201716
6/4/2020
018253
LOPEZ, OSCAR
REIMB:DOOR BELL-HR COVID
107.66
107.66
SCREENING
201717
6/4/2020
003782
MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET
125.64
125.64
ATHACO INC
MAINT
201718
6/4/2020
020302
MARIS IMAGING SOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT IMAGING SVCS: CITY
17,938.00
17,938.00
LLC
CLERK
Page:?
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
O6/04/2020 9:09:02AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201719
6/4/2020
019823
MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC
DEEP CLEANING: IWTCM
201720
6/4/2020
018314
MICHAEL BAKER
ENG SUPPORT
INTERNATIONAL
SVC: ULT. INTRCHG, PW04-08
201721
6/4/2020
021343
MILLER ARCHITECTURAL
3/1-4/30 ARCHITECT SVCS: PW19-06
CORP
201722
6/4/2020
004043
MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: TPL
INC
MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PW PARK
201723
6/4/2020
018099
NATIONAL SAFETY
DOT TESTING: HR
COMPLIANCE INC
201724
6/4/2020
001323
NESTLE WATERS NORTH
WTR DLVRY SVC: TCC
AMERICA, DBA
READYREFRESH
WTR DLVRY SVC: TPL
WTR DLVRY SVC: CITY MGR OFC
WTR DLVRY SVC: SKATE PARK
WTR DLVRY SVC: CRC
WTR DLVRY SVC: FOC
WTR DLVRY SVC: PBSP
WTR DLVRY SVC: THEATER
WTR DLVRY SVC: TVM
WTR DLVRY SVC: AQUATICS
WTR DLVRY SVC: HELP CTR
WTR DLVRY SVC: MRC
201725
6/4/2020
021121
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR
MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR
OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA
MEDICAL CTR
201726
6/4/2020
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE
CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:PW PARKS
201727
6/4/2020
019851
ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC
PRGS PMT #33: ULT. INTRCHG,
PW04-08
201728
6/4/2020
000472
PARADISE CHEVROLET
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT:FIRE
CADILLAC
201729
6/4/2020
020472
PARKING LOGIX INC
REPEATER FOR AC POWER:PRKG
STRUCTURE
201730
6/4/2020
021834
PITT, ROBERTA
REFUND: VIOLATION DISMISSAL
#340727
Amount Paid Check Total
4,260.00
4,260.00
1,345.00
1,345.00
2,420.00
2,420.00
434.75
404.93
839.68
89.95
89.95
90.93
86.07
87.42
17.22
99.16
123.15
34.44
82.64
65.26
32.60
101.29
8.69
828.87
84.50 84.50
581.15
581.15
9,357.18
9,357.18
163.49
163.49
114.81
114.81
70.00
70.00
Page:8
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9
06/04/2020 9:09:02AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
201731
6/4/2020
010338
POOL & ELECTRICAL
VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATIC
PRODUCTS INC
FACILITIES
VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATIC FACILITIE
201732
6/4/2020
000254
PRESS ENTERPRISE
SUBSCR:CENTRAL SRVCS 181108943
COMPANY INC
201733
6/4/2020
014379
PROFESSIONAL IMAGE
BANNER PROGRAM:ECON DEV
ADVERTISING, DBA EXTREME
SIGNSGRAPHICS
JAN-JUN BANNER MAINT PRGM:ECON C
201734
6/4/2020
000353
RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR,
MAR'20 PRKG CITATION
CONTROLLER
ASSESSMENTS
APR'20 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS
201735
6/4/2020
001592
RIVERSIDE CO INFO
APR EMERG RADIO RENTAL: TEM
TECHNOLOGY
SHERIFF
201736
6/4/2020
001365
RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF,
RENEW PERMIT:FIRE STN 95
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DEPT
201737
6/4/2020
017699
SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M
HOSPITAL PARADE 2020
PRESTON
201738
6/4/2020
013695
SHRED -IT US JV LLC, DBA:
5/11 DOC SHRED SRVCS: TEM
SHRED -IT USA LLC
SHERIFF
201739
6/4/2020
009746
SIGNS BY TOMORROW
SIGN POSTING SRVCS
201740 6/4/2020 021647 SO COAST LIGHTING &
DESIGN INC
201741 6/4/2020 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST
CONTROL INC
201742 6/4/2020 012652 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,
TELEPHONE COMPANY
PA19-0940/0941:PLNG
SIGN POSTING SRVCS LR20-0209:PLNG
SIGN POSTING SRVCS PA20-0192:PLNG
REPLACEMENT BOLLARD: MERCEDES
STREET
PEST CONTROL SRVCS:WOLF CREEK
PARK
MAY PEST CONTROL SRVCS:CITY FACS
PEST CONTROL SRVCES:LOMA LINDA P,
PEST CONTROL SRVCS:SPLASH PAD
PEST CONTROL SRVCS: FIRE STN 73
JUN GEN USAGE: 0141,0839,2593,9306
Amount Paid Check Total
253.22
594.35
54.11
4,480.00
3,181.75
4,523.00
4,193.17
2,359.72
1.203.00
250.00
20.11
427.50
641.25
213.75
1.865.06
49.00
881.00
94.00
49.00
68.00
603.93
847.57
54.11
7,661.75
8,716.17
2,359.72
1,203.00
250.00
20.11
1,282.50
1,865.06
1,141.00
603.93
Page9
apChkLst
06/04/2020
9:09:02AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 10
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201743
6/4/2020
008337
STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT
SUPPLIES:COVID-19
7.88
SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES PRGM
43.76
SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES PRGM
21.63
SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES PRGM
23.91
SUPPLIES:HUMAN SERVICES PRGM
73.37
SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK
342.91
CREDIT.SUPPLIES/POLICE MALL STORE
-31.40
OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC
277.92
OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC
5.21
SUPPLIES:CRC
22.02
SUPPLIES:POLICE OLD TOWN STOREFF
45.79
833.00
201744
6/4/2020
002366
STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET
CARPET CLEANING:CIVIC CENTER
12,200.00
CLEANING
CARPET CLEANING SRVCS:MPSC
175.00
CARPET CLEAN:PD STOREFRONT/VISIT
225.00
12,600.00
201745
6/4/2020
015648
STEIN ANDREW, DBA PARKINK
DAY CAMP SUPPLIES:CRC
266.14
SUPPLIES:CRC
207.46
DAY CAMP SUPPLIES:CRC
677.66
1,151.26
201746
6/4/2020
019494
SUPPORT WAREHOUSE
HP SUPPORT WARRANTY:INFO TECH
896.48
896.48
LIMITED
201747
6/4/2020
010924
TAND D COMMUNICATIONS
CABLING SERVICES:COUNCIL
735.81
735.81
INC
CHAMBERS
201748
6/4/2020
019714
TAYLOR'SAPPLIANCE
KITCHEN EQUIP: FIRE STN 92
4,623.98
4,623.98
201749
6/4/2020
021361
TELECOM LAW FIRM PC F/N/A,
4/8-5/11 LEGAL SRVCS:PLNG
1,663.00
1,663.00
KRAMER TELECOM LAW FIRM
201750
6/4/2020
010679
TEMECULAAUTO
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT:TCSD
58.16
58.16
REPAIR/RADIATOR, DBAAUTO
ENTERPRISE INC
201751
6/4/2020
003941
TEMECULA WINNELSON
PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS
174.00
COMPANY
PARKS
PLUMBING SUPPLIES:CIVIC CENTER
28.71
202.71
201752
6/4/2020
016311
TIERCE, NICHOLAS
GRAPHIC DESIGN SRVCS: THEATER
2,520.00
2,520.00
201753
6/4/2020
017885
TRANSAMERICAN DIRECT INC.
POSTAGE & MAILING:CITYWIDE
2,500.00
2,500.00
RECYCLING
201754
6/4/2020
000161
TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC
SUPPORT & UPDT-TIME &
3,627.75
3,627.75
ATTENDANCE MOD
Page:10
apChkLst
06/04/2020
9:09:02AM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 11
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
201755
6/4/2020
007766
UNDERGROUND SERVICE
MAY UNDRGRND UTILITY LOCATOR
203.05
ALERT, OF SOUTHERN
ALERTS:PW T
CALIFORNIA
MAY UNDRGRND UTILITY LOCATOR ALE
105.60
308.65
201756
6/4/2020
012549
UPODIUM, AKA JOHN
VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES - STA 95
51.56
FONTEYN
VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES - STA 92
213.54
VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES - STA 12
325.77
590.87
201757
6/4/2020
013647
VICAR OPERATING, INC., DBA:
VET MEDICAL EXAM:DAYKA 5/28
68.90
68.90
VCAANTECH, INC.
201758
6/4/2020
020275
WALLACE & ASSOC
CONSTR MGMT SRVCS:PECH.PKWY
13,300.00
13,300.00
CONSULTING INC
WIDEN
201759
6/4/2020
007987
WALMART
MISC SUPPLIES:FIRE STN 92
272.04
SUPPLIES:HUMAN SRVCS PRGM-SFSP
307.21
579.25
201760
6/4/2020
021833
WALTER, BEVERLEE
RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT
89.95
89.95
201761
6/4/2020
001881
WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES: AQUATICS PRGM
940.39
940.39
INC
201762
6/4/2020
008668
WES FLOWERS
SUNSHINE FUND
63.93
63.93
201763
6/4/2020
003730
WEST COASTARBORISTS INC
4/16-30 EMERG TREE MAINT VAR
3,384.45
SLOPES
4/16-30 TREE MAINT:CAMPOS VERDES
1,228.50
4/16-30 TREE MAINT:VAIL RANCH
9,828.00
4/16-30 TREE MAINT:TEMEKU HILLS
1,512.00
TREE/STUMP REMOVAL:OLD TOWN FRC
3,097.50
19,050.45
201764
6/4/2020
000341
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC
APR TRAF ENG SVC:PED SGNL
4,423.97
EQUP,PW19-10
APR TRAF ENG SVC:RDHWK & V.RANCH
1,078.50
5,502.47
Grand total for UNION BANK:
659,475.86
Page:11
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12
O6/04/2020 9:09:02AM CITY OF TEMECULA
144 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 659,475.86
Page:12
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2020
PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report
as of April 30, 2020.
BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the
City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively.
Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the
next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund
(LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust
statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information.
The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and
Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of April 30, 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2020
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
April 30, 2020
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
(951)694-6430
Par
Market
Book
% of
Days to
YTM
YTM
Investments
Value
Value
Value
Portfolio
Term
Maturity
360 Equiv.
365 Equiv.
Managed Pool Accounts
45,633,534.42
45,633,534.42
45,633,534.42
32.19
1
1
0.684
0.694
Retention Escrow Account
878,851.60
878,851.60
878,851.60
0.62
1
1
0.055
0.056
Letter of Credit
2.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
1
1
0.000
0.000
Trust Accounts
11,606,822.09
11,606,822.09
11,606,822.09
8.19
1
1
6.372
6.460
Local Agency Investment Funds
63,622,507.57
64,098,468.51
63,622,507.57
44.89
1
1
1.625
1.648
Federal Agency Callable Securities
13,000,000.00
13,110,410.00
13,000,000.00
9.17
1,343
452
1.729
1.753
Federal Agency Bullet Securities
7,000,000.00
7,177,350.00
7,000,000.00
4.94
1,122
700
2.001
2.029
141,741,717.68
142,505,438.62
141,741,717.68
100.00%
179
77
1.729
1.753
Investments
Cash
Passbook/Checking
10,415,831.68
10,415,831.68
10,415,831.68
1
1
0.000
0.000
(not included in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
152,157,549.36
152,921,270.30
152,157,549.36
179
77
1.729
1.753
Total Earnings April 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 214,678.34 1,672,033.85
Average Daily Balance 145,288,931.92 140,726,356.77
Effective Rate of Return 1.80% 1.42%
Reporting period 04/01/2020-04/30/2020 Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP
Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
April 30, 2020
Page 1
Average
Purchase
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to Maturity
CUSIP
Investment #
Issuer Balance
Date
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
Rate
360
365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
233358001-6
01-2 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
11,359.60
11,359.60
11,359.60
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
233358006-6
01-2 REF RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
508,476.70
508,476.70
508,476.70
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
233358000-6
01-2 REF ST
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
359,689.79
359,689.79
359,689.79
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
276213009-6
03-02 COI
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
276213008-6
03-02 IMPR
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
711.68
711.68
711.68
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
276213006-6
03-02 RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
749,582.49
749,582.49
749,582.49
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
164741002-6
03-03 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
164741008-6
03-03IMP
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
228,002.24
228,002.24
228,002.24
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
164741006-6
03-03RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
408.92
408.92
408.92
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
164741000-6
03-03SPEC
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
720,373.10
720,373.10
720,373.10
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
164742002-6
03-06 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.630
1.608
1.630
1
164742000-6
03-06SPEC
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
103,650.69
103,650.69
103,650.69
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
229462007-6
03-1 2012 RF
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
3.80
3.80
3.80
0.260
0.256
0.260
1
229462002--6
03-1 BOND FD
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
2,192.43
2,192.43
2,192.43
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
229462009-6
03-1 COI
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
229462006-6
03-1 RESERV
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
17,595.19
17,595.19
17,595.19
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
229462000-6
03-1 SPECF
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
348,424.52
348,424.52
348,424.52
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
94669921-6
03-1ACQ11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.870
0.858
0.870
1
94669911-6
03-1ACQA11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669917-6
03-1 RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669916-6
03-1 RESB11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669000-6
03-1 SPTAX11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
276213002-6
03-2 REFU
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
17,103.56
17,103.56
17,103.56
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
276213000-6
03-2 SPEC
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
246,958.11
246,958.11
246,958.11
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
94686001-6
03-4ADMIN11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
533.67
533.67
533.67
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
94686005-6
034PREP11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
13.66
13.66
13.66
0.150
0.148
0.150
1
94686000-6
034RED11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
150,157.12
150,157.12
150,157.12
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
94686006-6
034RES11
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
21,750.85
21,750.85
21,750.85
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
276213022-6
16-01 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
69,306.31
69,306.31
69,306.31
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
276213023-6
16-01 CAPINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.870
0.858
0.870
1
276213029-6
16-01 COI
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
276213028-6
16-01 IMP
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
6,718,996.71
6,718,996.71
6,718,996.71
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
276213026-6
16-01 RESERV
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
3,186,385.59
3,186,385.59
3,186,385.59
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
276213020-6
16-01 SPECF
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
1,461,119.69
1,461,119.69
1,461,119.69
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
218848001-6
2017A&B INT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
1,407.77
1,407.77
1,407.77
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
218848008-6
2017ABPRIORP
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
17,945.80
17,945.80
17,945.80
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01
Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01
Portfolio TEME
NL! CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
April 30, 2020
Page 2
Average
Purchase
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to Maturity
CUSIP
Investment #
Issuer Balance
Date
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
Rate
360
365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
218848013-2
2017B COI
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848000-6
2017B DS
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
1,601,595.06
1,601,595.06
1,601,595.06
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
218848002-6
2017B PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
981.71
981.71
981.71
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
218848009-6
2017B_PROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
13,113,488.74
13,113,488.74
13,113,488.74
0.180
0.178
0.180
1
233358009-6
233358009-6
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94434160-6
RDA-021NT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94434161-6
RDA-02PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886000-6
RDA-06AINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886001-6
RDA06APRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886010-6
RDA06BINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886011-6
RDA06BPRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.680
0.671
0.680
1
107886016-6
RDA06BRES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.940
0.927
0.940
1
107886020-6
RDA071NT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
107886021-6
RDA07PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.930
0.917
0.930
1
107886028-6
RDA07PROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.940
0.927
0.940
1
107886026-6
RDA07RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.940
0.927
0.940
1
136343008-6
RDA10APROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
136343018-6
RDA10BPROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
136343000-6
RDA10INT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
136343001-6
RDA10PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
136343006-6
RDA10RSRV
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
146161000-6
RDA11AINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
146161001-6
RDA11APRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669902-3
03-1 BOND3
First American Treasury
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94434160-1
RDA 02 INT1
First American Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.010
0.010
0.010
1
94434161-2
RDA 02 PRIN2
First American Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.010
0.010
0.010
1
136343018-2
RDA 10B CIP2
First American Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.010
0.010
0.010
1
146161008-3
RDA11APROJ
Federated Institutional Tax Fr
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.800
0.789
0.800
1
146161006-3
RDA11ARSRV
Federated Institutional Tax Fr
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669921-5
03-01 ACQ11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669911-5
03-01 ACQA11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669917-5
03-01 RES
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94669906-5
03-01 RESA11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.001
0.001
0.001
1
94669916-5
03-01 RESB11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669000-5
03-01SPTAX11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
164742006-5
03-06 RES
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP
Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
April 30, 2020
Page 3
Average
Purchase
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to Maturity
CUSIP
Investment #
Issuer Balance
Date
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value
Rate
360
365
Maturity Date
Managed Pool
Accounts
164742000-5
03-06 SPEC
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669902-5
03-1 bond fd
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94686001-5
034 ADMIN11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94686005-5
034 PREP11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
94686006-5
034 RES11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
94669917-1
03-01-1 RES
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
276213008-1
03-02 IMP
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
13,311,171.50
13,311,171.50
13,311,171.50
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
164742006-1
03-06 RES-1
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
329,373.79
329,373.79
329,373.79
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
229462007-1
03-1 2012 RE
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
808,015.09
808,015.09
808,015.09
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
94669911-1
03-1 ACQ A2
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
94669921-1
03-1 ACQ B2
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
744727011-1
03-3 ACQ 2
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
164741006-1
0303-1 RES
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
1,526,313.85
1,526,313.85
1,526,313.85
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
107886028-1
RDA 07 PRO-1
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
107886026-1
RDA 07 RES-1
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
136343018-1
RDA 10B CIP1
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.648
1.625
1.648
1
229462020-0
03-01 CASH
USBANK
444.69
444.69
444.69
0.000
0.000
1
233358050-1
01-2 SPECESC
U.S. Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.360
0.355
0.360
1
Subtotal
and Average 46,211,952.45
45,633,534.42
45,633,534.42
45,633,534.42
0.684
0.694
1
Retention Escrow Account
PACIFIC PREMIER
20190607-882
PACIFIC PREMIER
08/01/2019
94,237.12
94,237.12
94,237.12
0.000
0.000
1
218848050-0
2002 ESCROW
USBANK
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848060-0
2006AESCRO
USBANK
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848070-0
2006BESCRO
USBANK
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848080-0
2007ESCROW
USBANK
07/01/2019
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
229462020-2
03-01 ESCROW
U.S. Treasury
784,614.48
784,614.48
784,614.48 0.063
0.062
0.063
1
Subtotal and Average
877,993.27
878,851.60
878,851.60
878,851.60
0.055
0.056
1
Letter of Credit
218848006-1 2017B RESER ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL COR 07/01/2019 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1
233358006-1 01-2 REFRESI ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2019 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1
Subtotal and Average 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.000 0.000 1
Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP
Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
April 30, 2020
Page 4
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value
Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Trust Accounts
6746058700 PARS Pension US Bank Trust 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 6.460 6.372 6.460 1
Subtotal and Average 10,887,848.52 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 11,606,822.09 6.372 6.460 1
Local Agency Investment
Funds
SYSCITY CITY
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
33,483,100.51
33,733,588.09
33,483,100.51
1.648 1.625
1.648
1
SYSRDA RDA
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
1,873.62
1,887.64
1,873.62
1.648 1.625
1.648
1
SYSTCSD TCSD
CA Local Agency Investment Fun
30,137,533.44
30,362,992.78
30,137,533.44
1.648 1.625
1.648
1
Subtotal and Average 63,504,785.17
63,622,507.57
64,098,468.51
63,622,507.57
1.625
1.648
1
Federal Agency Callable Securities
3133ELFX7
01252
Federal Farm Credit Bank
3130AANA2
01227
Federal Home Loan Bank
3130ABYY6
01235
Federal Home Loan Bank
3130ACN83
01238
Federal Home Loan Bank
3134G8PP8
01220
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
3134GBGZ9
01232
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
3134GBNK4
01234
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
3134GBL42
01237
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
3134GSMF9
01246
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
3134GU6D7
01253
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
3136G3CL7
01218
Federal National Mtg Assn
3136G3TE5
01221
Federal National Mtg Assn
3136G4UL5
01255
Federal National Mtg Assn
Subtotal
and Average 13
Federal Agency
Bullet Securities
3133EJT74
01249
Federal Farm Credit Bank
3133ELMA9
01254
Federal Farm Credit Bank
3133ELTU8
01256
Federal Farm Credit Bank
3130ADEB4
01240
Federal Home Loan Bank
3130ADSJ2
01244
Federal Home Loan Bank
3130AHF81
01251
Federal Home Loan Bank
3135GOU92
01250
Federal National Mtg Assn
Subtotal and Average
,000,000.00
7,000,000.00
12/30/2019
1,000,000.00
1,008,800.00
1,000,000.00
1.650
1.627
1.650
608
12/30/2021
01/30/2017
1,000,000.00
1,003,240.00
1,000,000.00
1.750
1.726
1.750
90
07/30/2020
08/24/2017
1,000,000.00
1,011,390.00
1,000,000.00
1.750
1.726
1.750
299
02/24/2021
10/30/2017
1,000,000.00
1,000,530.00
1,000,000.00
1.700
1.677
1.700
14
05/15/2020
03/30/2016
1,000,000.00
1,004,470.00
1,000,000.00
1.500
1.661
1.684
152
09/30/2020
04/27/2017
1,000,000.00
1,029,770.00
1,000,000.00
2.000
1.964
1.991
636
01/27/2022
05/30/2017
1,000,000.00
1,001,110.00
1,000,000.00
1.625
1.603
1.625
28
05/29/2020
09/28/2017
1,000,000.00
1,005,140.00
1,000,000.00
1.670
1.647
1.670
150
09/28/2020
05/30/2018
1,000,000.00
1,025,420.00
1,000,000.00
3.000
2.959
3.000
1,120
05/26/2023
01/28/2020
1,000,000.00
1,007,330.00
1,000,000.00
1.650
1.627
1.650
1,183
07/28/2023
03/24/2016
1,000,000.00
1,004,590.00
1,000,000.00
1.420
1.401
1.420
146
09/24/2020
06/29/2016
1,000,000.00
1,001,660.00
1,000,000.00
1.250
1.233
1.250
59
06/29/2020
02/26/2020
1,000,000.00
1,006,960.00
1,000,000.00
1.650
1.627
1.650
1,396
02/26/2024
13,000,000.00
13,110,410.00
13,000,000.00
1.729
1.753
452
11/15/2018
1,000,000.00
1,042,370.00
1,000,000.00
3.050
3.008
3.050
563
11/15/2021
02/07/2020
1,000,000.00
1,030,700.00
1,000,000.00
1.420
1.401
1.420
1,193
08/07/2023
03/18/2020
1,000,000.00
1,013,820.00
1,000,000.00
0.920
0.907
0.920
1,417
03/18/2024
01/12/2018
1,000,000.00
1,012,210.00
1,000,000.00
2.125
2.096
2.125
256
01/12/2021
03/08/2018
1,000,000.00
1,018,350.00
1,000,000.00
2.460
2.426
2.460
311
03/08/2021
10/25/2019
1,000,000.00
1,020,060.00
1,000,000.00
1.600
1.578
1.600
542
10/25/2021
01/11/2019
1,000,000.00
1,039,840.00
1,000,000.00
2.625
2.589
2.625
620
01/11/2022
7,000,000.00
7,177,350.00
7,000,000.00
2.001
2.029
700
Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP
Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
April 30, 2020
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity
Total and Average 145,288,931.92 141,741,717.68 142,505,438.62 141,741,717.68 1.729 1.753 77
Page 5
Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP
Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Cash
April 30, 2020
Page 6
Average
Purchase
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to
CUSIP
Investment #
Issuer Balance
Date
Par Value
Market Value
Book Value Rate
360
365 Maturity
Passbook/Checking
Accounts
1453718479
WORKERS
BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC
07/01/2019
13,512.09
13,512.09
13,512.09
0.000
0.000
1
SYSPetty Cash
Petty Cash
City of Temecula
07/01/2019
3,911.00
3,911.00
3,911.00
0.000
0.000
1
SYSGen Ck Acct
Gen Ck Acct
Union Bank of California
10,389,699.39
10,389,699.39
10,389,699.39
0.000
0.000
1
SYSParking Ck
PARKING CITA
Union Bank of California
07/01/2019
8,709.20
8,709.20
8,709.20
0.000
0.000
1
Average Balance 0.00
Total Cash and Investments
145,288,931.92
O
152,157,549.36 152,921,270.30 152,157,549.36 1.729 1.753 77
Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET_MTH: 06/03/2020 11:01 NL! CP
Run Date: 06/03/2020 - 11:01
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Cash and Investments Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
Through April 2020
Fund # Fund Name Beginning Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Total
001
GENERAL FUND
$
34,238,423.75 $
6,106,810.39
$ 5,453,601.84
$ 34,891,632.30
002
MEASURE S FUND
8,397,164.03
2,181,062.94
-
10,578,226.97
100
STATE GAS TAX FUND
525,596.97
423,999.54
525,596.97
423,999.54
102
RMRA-ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACT
738,486.64
198,574.96
-
937,061.60
103
STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND
2,566,181.99
6,431.99
2,572,613.98
106
JEFFERSON STREET IN LIEU FEES
495,656.25
394,647.01
-
890,303.26
120
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
3,339,070.25
19,777.74
393,933.10
2,964,914.89
125
PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT
362,300.65
1,031.22
120.00
363,211.87
145
TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM
197,090.52
561.95
-
197,652.47
150
AB 2766 FUND
239,494.98
625.78
-
240,120.76
160
SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
17,135.39
16,699.69
17,135.39
16,699.69
161
TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND
26,943.87
76.82
-
27,020.69
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1,891,640.40
2,409.37
33,003.88
1,861,045.89
170
MEASURE A FUND
6,603,901.22
17,300.25
193,951.48
6,427,249.99
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
1,256,472.45
-
912,025.77
344,446.68
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS
23.71
2,244.45
2,268.16
-
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING
436,534.55
5,105.44
4,815.40
436,824.59
195
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT
20,838.16
58.17
-
20,896.33
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
401,758.90
1,146.32
21,150.30
381,754.92
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
407,802.64
1,836.69
65,845.51
343,793.82
198
PUBLIC ART
51,667.82
978.45
-
52,646.27
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND
13,597,320.14
7,659,555.97
1,671,011.24
19,585,864.87
275
CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND
227,837.03
165.21
228,002.24
277
CFD-RORIPAUGH
14,994,792.30
75,150.35
1,614,870.23
13,455,072.42
278
CFD-RORIPAUGH II
6,714,128.27
4,868.44
-
6,718,996.71
300
INSURANCE FUND
1,191,993.23
10,471.50
20,185.79
1,182,278.94
305
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
1,900,528.68
5,874.19
6,010.73
1,900,392.14
310
VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND
1,992,912.79
5,624.55
-
1,998,537.34
320
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
1,379,088.92
5,333.60
375,108.69
1,009,313.83
325
TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND
1,567,617.12
4,181.17
48,025.77
1,523,772.52
330
CENTRAL SERVICES
53,147.69
42.59
22,875.47
30,314.81
335
CENTRAL SERVICES
345,154.16
932.75
-
346,086.91
340
FACILITIES
654,425.58
3,615.33
91,604.76
566,436.15
350
FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND
198,773.78
393.55
-
199,167.33
380
SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND
14,724,743.00
10,677.08
14,735,420.08
381
REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST
140,028.08
1,845.33
141,873.41
460
CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND
94,495.41
269.43
-
94,764.84
472
CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE
930,769.58
1,280.07
2,219.35
929,830.30
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,998,715.38
5,540.93
2,219.50
2,002,036.81
474
AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
192,257.64
214.33
1,679.64
190,792.33
475
CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
2,639,896.96
10,230.65
2,353.34
2,647,774.27
476
CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND
478,765.46
2,020.73
2,219.50
478,566.69
477
CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,062,940.84
1,239.22
2,487.34
1,061,592.72
478
CFD-RORIPAUGH II
4,750,412.28
5,987.48
2,219.50
4,754,180.26
501
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD
7,317.28
29.50
2,463.11
4,883.67
502
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK
98,386.26
281.13
2,014.70
96,652.69
503
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS
34,671.92
107.90
2,808.91
31,970.91
504
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS
2,772.96
8.45
372.79
2,408.62
505
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES
19,083.09
75.84
2,060.81
17,098.12
506
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY
33,063.75
101.04
1,210.67
31,954.12
507
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW
4,320.06
14.62
840.83
3,493.85
508
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE
82,316.87
261.03
6,718.59
75,859.31
509
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA
28,135.44
80.30
179.63
28,036.11
510
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE
11,067.94
32.42
526.21
10,574.15
511
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW
2,818.25
8.17
120.53
2,705.89
512
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS
93,781.74
281.76
4,222.80
89,840.70
513
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP
21,147.47
65.76
3,117.78
18,095.45
514
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES
7,528.02
22.30
794.30
6,756.02
515
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES
7,455.66
22.06
574.66
6,903.06
516
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS
54,938.84
158.16
1,175.78
53,921.22
517
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA
1,387.91
4.11
120.49
1,271.53
518
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS
43,370.94
134.79
5,546.11
37,959.62
519
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR
96,504.51
277.74
3,243.14
93,539.11
520
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL
196,837.44
595.06
14,412.08
183,020.42
521
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH
2O1,923.33
10,559.26
19,769.56
192,713.03
522
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE
6,647.61
1,999.82
228.65
8,418.78
523
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
18,787.87
53.62
400.11
18,441.38
524
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON
52,035.29
171.39
23,517.94
28,688.74
525
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS
60,337.14
175.58
2,280.79
58,231.93
526
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION
870.78
2.69
75.99
797.48
527
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE
8,208.10
23.80
637.40
7,594.50
528
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK
445,509.14
1,278.17
35,845.07
410,942.24
529
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT
2,540.70
6.55
112.19
2,435.06
530
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES
35,953.56
102.51
-
36,056.07
701
PENSION RATE STABILIZATION FUND
$
10,863,056.33
743,765.76
-
$ 11,606,822.09
Grand Total:
$
146,587,605.66 $
17,957,594.91
$ 11,623,930.27
$ 152,921,270.30
Journal Entries completed after March's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts / Disbursements columns.
Item No. 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Approve Third Amendment to Lease Agreement Between City of Temecula and
Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau DBA Visit Temecula Valley
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Third Amendment to Lease
Agreement between City of Temecula and Visit Temecula Valley (VTV) and authorize the
Assistant City Manager to execute the amendment.
BACKGROUND: Roughly 30-days into the economic impacts that began as a result of
the City, County & State response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, in mid -April the City
responded favorably to a request from VTV to defer rent for a three-month period beginning with
the April 2020 rent and concluding with the June 2020 rent due to an anticipated decrease in
revenues impacting VTV's cash flow. The amendment executed at that time included provisions
that monthly rent payment would recommence July 1, 2020 and that both parties agree to negotiate
terms of repayment of the deferred rent. At that time no one knew how long and how deeply the
local economy would be impacted.
As reported during the June 9, 2020 City Council meeting Fiscal Year 2020-21 budget
presentation, the City's revenues, including Sales Tax and Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT)
amongst others, have been dramatically impacted. Fortunately for the City, due to the current and
former City Councils' leadership, prudent fiscal policies are in place so the City could accumulate
reserves to weather this financial storm. VTV has been hit much harder as their fiscal solvency
relies solely on tourism revenue streams which include: a hotel based business improvement
district assessment (City), a Wine Country Tourism Marketing District (County), and a
Memorandum of Understanding with the Pechanga related to the Pechanga Resort and Casino.
Each of these have been severely impacted by travel restrictions resulting from the State of
California's Stay at Home Order issued in March 2020.
Although leisure travel restrictions for many of the businesses in the tourism industry sector were
relaxed on Friday June 12, 2020, there is still uncertainty of how long the tourism economy will
be affected by the State's executive order to stay at home in response to COVID-19. VTV is
projecting a 62% or greater loss in revenue for 2020. Therefore, VTV is requesting their rent and
utilities be waived for a twelve (12) month period to assist in their recovery. Like the City they
have taken extreme measures to reduce expenses, including furloughing a majority of their staff.
A large part of economic recovery for Temecula Valley will be based on the recovery of the local
tourism industry. VTV intends to focus/direct their limited resources on marketing Temecula.
They have been diligently working on a Recover and Reopening Marketing Plan to help support
our travel and leisure partners and the community.
There is no question, one of the primary drivers of the recent fiscal expansion of the local tourism
economy is the marketing efforts of VTV. Our community has grown to depend on Visit Temecula
Valley to expand this key industry sector, their efforts will be a key component of restarting this
local economic engine.
The City Attorney's office has opined that granting this waiver is permissible as it would be
considered an Economic Development incentive geared toward reviving a key industry sector of
the local economy. Staff is supportive of this request as the return on this "investment" will pay
dividends in the long run with the robust recovery of the City's tourism economy.
FISCAL IMPACT: In approving this amendment, the City would forego roughly
$95,000 in annual rental revenue, plus roughly $12,000 in annual utility cost recovery.
ATTACHMENTS: Amendment 3 to VTV Lease Agreement
THIRD AMENDMENT TO OFFICE LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AND TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU DBA VISIT
TEMECULA VALLEY
This Third Amendment to Office Lease ("Third Amendment") Between the City of
Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau dba Visit Temecula Valley is made
by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City" or "Landlord") and Temecula
Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau, a California non-profit corporation, dba Visit Temecula
Valley ("Tenant") and is effective on the date it is fully executed. The City and Tenant may be
referred to below collectively as the "Parties".
1. RECITALS. This Third Amendment is made with respect to the following purposes
and facts that the Parties acknowledge as true and correct:
A. On February 13, 2018, the Parties entered into that certain Office Lease
between the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau dba Visit
Temecula Valley ("Office Lease") regarding the extension of the lease by Tenant of the Premises
described in Exhibit "A" to a November 2009 Office Lease between the Parties, and authorizing
Tenant to lease the Expansion Premises described in Exhibit "A" to the Office Lease pursuant to
the terms and conditions of the Office Lease.
B. Recital J of the Office Lease recognized the value of Tenant's operations
to the City of Temecula and its residents and the value of having Tenant's offices located adjacent
to City Hall within the tourism district of Old Town.
C. On February 13, 2019, the Parties entered into that certain First
Amendment to the Office Lease between the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention
& Visitors Bureau dba Visit Temecula Valley ("First Amendment") to amend Section 4.B. of the
Office Lease to provide for up to $250,000.00 in reimbursement for the Tenant Improvements and
to modify the Monthly Rent set forth at Section 5.A.1) of the Office Lease and the Security Deposit
set forth in Section 5.C. of the Office Lease in consideration of the $50,000.00 increase in
reimbursement for the Tenant Improvements.
D. On May 5, 2020, the Parties entered into that certain Second Amendment
to Office Lease between the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau
dba Visit Temecula Valley ("Second Amendment"). Section 5.A.1) of the Office Lease provides
for the payment of monthly rent set forth therein by Tenant on or before the first business day of
each calendar month. The state of emergency declared by federal, state, and local governments
in response to the public health impact of the novel coronavirus ("COVID-19") and closures of
non -essential businesses impacted the tourism industry. The Second Amendment amended
Section 5.A. of the Office Lease to add a new Section 5.A.2) to provide for the deferment of the
monthly rent for a three-month period to assist Tenant during the COVID-19 public health crisis
and to provide for the negotiation of the deferred rent.
E. COVID-19 has greatly impacted the national, state, and local economies.
COVID-19 public health concerns, State of California's Stay -at -Home Order issued in March
2020, and travel restrictions have impacted the tourism industry and tourism revenue streams on
which Tenant relies, including a hotel -based business improvement district assessment (City), a
Wine Country Tourism Marketing District (County), and a Memorandum of Understanding with
the Pechanga related to the Pechanga Resort and Casino. There is uncertainty regarding how
long the tourism sector will be affected by COVID-19. Tenant is projecting a loss in revenue of
62% or greater for 2020. Based on this, Tenant has requested from City a waiver of rent and
waiver of payment of any utilities that are contracted for by City for a twelve-month period
-1-
11086-0111\2408821v2.doc
commencing on April 1, 2020 to assist in Tenant's recovery. Tenant will focus its efforts and direct
its limited resources on marketing the Temecula area, including working on a Recover and
Reopening Marketing Plan to help support the travel and leisure partners and the community.
Tenant's marketing efforts fosters local tourism and will help in the local economic recovery. The
waiver in rent and waiver of payment of utilities contracted for by City represents an economic
development incentive aimed at reviving this key industry sector of the local economy.
Accordingly, the City and Tenant wish to enter into this Third Amendment to (1) Amend Section
5.A.2) to the Office Lease to provide for a twelve-month waiver of rent and (2) Amend Section 12
by adding a new Section 12.A. to provide for a waiver of payment of utilities contracted for by City
for a twelve-month period.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions of this Third
Amendment, the City and Tenant agree to amend Sections 5.A.2) and Section 12. of the Office
Lease, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below.
2. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 5.A.2) OF OFFICE LEASE. The City and Tenant
agree to amend and replace 5.A.2), which was added as part of the Second Amendment, so that
Section 5.A.2) reads as follows:
5. RENT; ADJUSTMENTS; SECURITY DEPOSIT.
A. Monthly Rent.
2) Based on the national, state, and local emergencies
declared in connection with the COVID-19 public health crisis and resulting impacts to the
economy and tourism industry, the Parties agree that the monthly rent specified in Section 5.A.1)
shall be waived for a period of twelve months, commencing with the rent due on April 1, 2020
("Waived Rent"). Accordingly, based on the Waived Rent, the next monthly rent in accordance
with Section 5.A.1) shall be due on April 1, 2021.
3. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 12 OF OFFICE LEASE. The City and Tenant agree
to amend Section 12 of the Office Lease titled "UTILITIES; HVAC" by adding a new Section 12.A.
to read as follows:
12. UTILITIES; HVAC. City will provide and pay for water and trash pick-up.
Tenant will obtain and pay for all other utilities, including gas, electricity, internet service, and
phone service. Tenant will pay Tenant's reasonable prorated share of utilities contracted for by
City (including electricity and gas), as determined by City, on a monthly basis within ten days after
City gives written notice to Tenant of the amount due.
A. Waiver of Payment of City -Contracted Utilities. In accordance with
the Waived Rent provision of Section 5.A.2), City waives Tenant's obligation to pay Tenant's
reasonable prorated share of utilities contracted for by City, including electricity and gas ("City -
contracted utilities") under Section 12 of the Office Lease for a twelve-month period, commencing
April 1, 2020 and ending March 30, 2021. Tenant's obligation to pay the City -contracted utilities
pursuant to Section 12 of the Office Lease will resume on April 1, 2021. This Section 12.A. has
no impact on Tenant's obligation to pay any utilities not contracted for by the City, including phone
and internet service.
4. NO OTHER CHANGES. Except for the changes specifically set forth in this Third
Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Office Lease, as amended by the First
Amendment and Second Amendment, will remain in full force and effect.
-2-
11086-0111\2408821v2.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Third Amendment as of the date
set forth below:
City/Landlord:
CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal
corporation
Dated: 12020
By:
Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Tenant-
TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION &
VISITORS BUREAU, a California nonprofit
corporation, dba Visit Temecula Valley
Dated:
0
Print Name:
Title:
Dated:
By:
Print Name:
Title:
, 2020
2020
-3-
11086-0111\2408821v2.doc
Item No. 5
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
JUNE 9, 2020
CALL TO ORDER at 8:37 PM: President Schwank
ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Rahn, Schwank
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected
unanimous approval.
8. Approve Action Minutes of May 26, 2020
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of May 26, 2020.
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
At 8:40 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 23,
2020, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council
Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Zak Schwank, President
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Item No. 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Receive Update on Proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail Program
in Old Town
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive an update on the proposed temporary
expanded dining/retail program in Old Town and provide general direction to staff.
BACKGROUND: At the June 9, 2020 City Council meeting the Council heard a
presentation, considered and ultimately approved a plan to temporarily close certain streets in Old
Town to allow for expanded dining and retail -shopping opportunities in an effort to offset the
limitations brought about by social distancing guidelines.
The initial concept for the proposed program was generally supported when introduced at a
meeting of Old Town business owners prior to the County and State allowing these businesses to
reopen. Once allowed to open, these business owners focused their attention on getting open and
preparing to safely have patrons return to their places of business. Now that they have been open
for a few weeks, it seems interest in this program has fallen, with more and more Old Town
merchants preferring vehicle traffic along the streets over a pedestrian paseo that could be used to
expand outdoor dining and outdoor shopping opportunities.
Staff will provide an update on the various comments and sentiment that Old Town Merchants
shared at meetings they attended related to this subject. Staff is looking for general direction from
the City Council on whether to proceed with the program.
FISCAL IMPACT: If the program moves forward, existing funds would be adequate to
implement and facilitate the needed City support costs. Participant program expenses could be
offset by increased retail sales that would otherwise be absent under the current COVID-19
circumstances. If the program does not move forward, there would be no additional expense.
ATTACHMENTS: June 9, 2020 Agenda Report
Item No. 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE: June 9, 2020
SUBJECT: Provide General Direction to Staff on a Proposed Temporary Expanded
Dining/Retail Program in Old Town
PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide general direction to staff on whether
to proceed with a proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program in Old Town.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented burden on
local restaurants and retail establishments. Over the past few months, many restaurants located
within the City of Temecula have been operating with limited service (to -go) or no service at all.
A significant portion of retail establishments were limited/closed. Under the current public health
orders, social distancing, reduced occupancy, and other operational restrictions are limiting the
ability of restaurants and retail establishments to service customers as they are allowed to
reopen/expand operations. Analysis from the National Restaurant Association and National Retail
Federation indicates the following:
• Restaurant sales have fallen to the lowest level in 35 yearsl
• Three decades of restaurant jobs were lost in the last two months
• Retail sales have dropped 16.4% in April (nationwide)'
Even amongst these challenging circumstances, the National Restaurant Association's analysis
shows that there is strong consumer demand for restaurants.
As the State of California, and Riverside County Public Health loosen restrictions, the City Council
has directed staff to implement multiple programs (Temecula Revive) that accelerate local
economic activity while maintaining compliance with all State or County mandates. Staff has
developed the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program to assist businesses during these
challenging times. The Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program consists of two different
avenues for businesses to temporarily expand their businesses.
1 https://www.restaurant.orWresearch
2 https://www.restaurant.orWresearch
s https://nrfcom/media-center/press-releases/april-retail-sales-drop-nearly-twice-much-march-during-coronavirus
1. Temporary expansions on private property
2. Temporary expansions within the public right-of-way in Old Town Temecula
Temporary Expansions on Private Property
Temporary expansions on private property would consist of businesses temporarily expanding
their footprint in outdoor areas such as adjacent private parking spaces, private courtyards, or
underutilized private sidewalk/frontage areas. Under the proposed program, applicants would
submit a no fee Temporary Use Permit with a next -day turnaround. The Temporary Use Permit
would ensure that all safety/legal requirements are met. Safety/legal requirements include
maintaining fire access, temporary barriers in parking spaces to protect customers from vehicles,
Americans with Disability Act compliance, and property owner approval. This program would
serve a wide range of restaurant and retail establishments throughout the City but would not
provide adequate relief to restaurants and retail establishments within Old Town Temecula, due to
the urban nature of the district.
Temporary Expansions within the Public Right -of -Way in Old Town Temecula
The unique urban nature of Old Town Temecula requires a different solution than other areas of
the City. Consequently, staff has developed a Temporary Expansion Dining/Retail program within
the public right-of-way for Old Town Temecula. The proposed expansions in Old Town would
allow restaurants/retail to utilize temporary street closures and sidewalks within the public right-
of-way to temporarily expand the footprint of businesses. Under the current proposal, Old Town
Front Street, Fifth Street, and Fourth Street would be temporally closed to vehicular traffic.
Applicants for the program would submit a Special Event Permit at no cost, with a next day
turnaround. The Special Event Permit would include a licensing agreement that would allow the
program to be stopped at the City's discretion. Staff is working with various internal and external
partners to address prospective issues, take appropriate public safety precautions, and help support
our businesses within the Old Town area.
On Friday, May 29, 2020, the City Council Old Town Steering Subcommittee (Naggar/Schwank)
received a presentation from staff regarding the proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail
program. At the conclusion of that meeting the City Council subcommittee directed staff to bring
the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail proposal to the City Council on June 9, 2020. Staff
received fourteen public comments regarding the proposed program. All comments were
supportive of the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program.
Staff is looking for general direction from the City Council on whether to proceed with the
program.
CEQA
The proposed Program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act because it can be
with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption and implementation of the proposed
program may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Program only provides for
temporary uses of already developed urban space. It is therefore not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the
California Code of Regulations. The uses authorized by the proposed program are minor public or
private alterations in the condition of land which do not involve removal of healthy, mature, scenic
trees. Therefore, the proposed program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act
review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15304(e) of the California Code of Regulations.
FISCAL IMPACT: Existing funds would be adequate to implement and facilitate the
program. Program expenses could be offset by increased retail sales that would otherwise be absent
under the current COVID-19 circumstances.
ATTACHMENTS: None
Item No. 8
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Consider the Vacancy on the City Council and Provide Direction Regarding the
Same
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the vacancy resulting from the
resignation of James Stewart and provide direction on whether to fill the vacancy by Council
appointment or election.
BACKGROUND: On June 4, 2020, former Mayor and City Council Member James
Stewart tendered his resignation effective immediately from the City Council. Government Code
Section 36512 states that within 60 days of its occurrence, the City Council must fill the vacancy
by appointment or call for a special election. A general election option is also discussed below.
The sixty-day deadline is August 3, 2020. While the vacated position is currently at -large, it is
scheduled to transition to District 2 with the November 2020 election.
Option 1: Appointment
Government Code Section 36512(b) requires that if a vacancy is filled by appointment, the actual
appointment be made within 60 days (in this case August 3, 2020). When the full Council is
engaged in the appointment process, the Brown Act is applicable and public noticing and access
requirements must be met. While the law does not dictate the specific process by which the
appointment must be made, there are several industry best practices to follow. It is anticipated that
the process would be similar to that which was utilized in filling the vacancy left by now
Supervisor Chuck Washington in 2015. The best practices are as follows:
Candidate Pool — To ensure the process is open and available to all residents as this is a citywide
seat currently, the appointment would be available to all residents of the City of the Temecula,
over the age of 18, continuously registered for at least 30 days prior to the date of appointment.
Advertising and Outreach — To ensure consistency with our existing efforts for board and
commission recruitments, the same advertising and outreach would be conducted for this
appointment. Current advertising efforts include printed newspaper, website publication, physical
postings and social media usage.
Application — The application for appointment would be similar to that which was utilized in 2015
and include information related to contacts, education, employment, public service, open-ended
questions, and the ability to include supplemental information.
Presentation / Interview — The presentation/interview would be at a special and/or regularly
scheduled council meeting. The Council would conduct 10-minute rounds for each applicant
consisting of a 5-minute presentation to be followed by a 5-minute question/answer period. The
question/answer period provides the Council with an opportunity to obtain additional information
related to the application packet or the presentation. Applicants present in alphabetical order based
on last name. Depending upon the number of applications, times and days could be adjusted. The
presentation/interview, as well as City Council deliberation, must be publicly noticed and
accessible pursuant to the Brown Act.
Timing and Term for Appointment - If the appointment option is selected, the new Council
Member must be seated on or before the August 3, 2020 deadline pursuant to the Government
Code. If the new Council Member is seated at the July 28, 2020 City Council meeting, the regularly
scheduled meeting prior to the deadline, he or she will continue to serve until December 8, 2020,
approximately four months from the date of taking office.
Costs for Appointment - The approximate cost associated with filling the vacancy by appointment
is $500 or less and will cover advertising, supplies and materials.
Timeline for Appointment - The general timeline associated with the appointment option to fill the
vacancy is as follows:
• June 23, 2020 — Direct Staff to Pursue Appointment Option
• June 25, 2020 — Advertise/Publish/Post Vacancy by Appointment
• June 25, 2020 — July 10, 2020 - Open Application Period for Vacancy
• July 10, 2020 — Deadline to Submit Application for Appointment
• July 14, 2020 — Special City Council Meeting to Conduct Presentations/Interviews
and Deliberate on Selection of Appointee
• July 28, 2020 — Seat New City Council Member at 2nd Meeting in July
Option 2: Election (No Action Required)
Government Code Section 36512(b) states that a special election to fill a vacancy shall be held on
the next regularly established election date not less than 114 days from the call of the special
election. The 114-day date is October 15, 2020. Established election dates set forth in Election
Code Section 1000 are March, April, June and November. As such, the next available date for a
special election is November 3, 2020. However, a general election has already been called for this
date.
On June 9, 2020, the City Council approved resolutions calling for the general municipal election
for Districts 2 and 4 to be held on November 3, 2020. The nomination period for the general
election is July 13, 2020 — August 7, 2020, notwithstanding a five-day extension if an incumbent
does not file. The term of office under a general municipal election would be a full term through
2024, versus a shortened term under an appointment or special election. A general municipal
election would cost approximately $3.50 per registered voter, the cost of which is accounted for in
the existing budget.
Based on the above, it is recommended that the City Council consider the vacancy and provide
direction regarding whether it wishes to fill the position through an appointment or election.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the consideration of this
item. Specific fiscal impacts associated with each option are discussed above.
ATTACHMENTS: None
Item No. 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Consider the Vacancy for the Position of Mayor and Provide Direction Regarding
the Same
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the vacancy of the position of Mayor
and provide direction regarding the same.
BACKGROUND: On June 4, 2020, former Mayor and City Council Member James
Stewart tendered his resignation effective immediately from the City Council rendering the
position of Mayor vacant. The City does not have a formal or written policy addressing vacancies
in the position of Mayor and/or Mayor Pro Tempore. Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.04.070,
which addresses addresses presiding officers, states as follows:
A. City council shall meet on the Tuesday after the general municipal election and choose
one of its members as mayor and one of its members as mayor pro tempore.
B. The mayor, and the mayor pro tempore, shall serve a term of one year, or until a
successor for each position is chosen. Three affirmative votes shall be required to choose
or change the mayor or mayor pro tempore.
C. In addition to the powers and duties of a council member, the mayor, or in the mayor's
absence, the mayor pro tempore, shall be the presiding officer of the city council.
Option 1: Appoint the Mayor Pro Tempore as Mayor, Select New Mayor Pro Tempore
While there is no set requirement, traditionally the Mayor Pro Tempore has rotated into the position
of Mayor. If the Council wishes to appoint the Mayor Pro Tempore as Mayor, the position of
Mayor Pro Tempore would become vacant and the Council would need to appoint a new Mayor
Pro Tempore. The terms for both positions would be through 2020.
Option 2: Appoint Another Council Member as Mayor
Since there is no set requirement, another Council Member may be appointed as Mayor. If the
Council wishes to appoint another Council Member as Mayor, the newly appointed Mayor would
serve through 2020. The Mayor Pro Tempore would also continue to serve in the existing capacity
for the remainder of 2020.
Option 3: Leave Position of Mayor Vacant, No Action Required
Since there is no set requirement, the position of Mayor may also be kept vacant for the remainder
of 2020. A new Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore would be selected when a full Council is seated.
If this option is selected, the Mayor Pro Tempore would continue to serve in the existing capacity
for the remainder of 2020.
It is therefore recommended that the City Council consider the vacancy in the position of Mayor
and provide general direction regarding the same.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: None
Item No. 10
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Consider Appointments to 2020 City Council Committees
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint members to serve on existing City
Council Committees for the balance of calendar year 2020 and evaluate the need for an additional
committee.
BACKGROUND: The City Council annually appoints members of its legislative body
to serve as liaisons to City commissions, external organizations, standing committees and
ad hoc subcommittees. Each year the City Council Committee Assignments List is reviewed and
revised for the upcoming calendar year. The Council Members appointed serve a calendar year
(January 1 — December 31). For appointments to external organizations that include a stipend,
Form 806 is completed and posted pursuant to the regulation requirements of the Fair Political
Practices Commission.
On January 14, 2020, the City Council appointed members of its legislative body to serve as the
primary and alternate appointees to a variety of committees. On June 4, 2020, former Mayor and
Council Member James Stewart tendered his resignation from the City Council, thereby vacating
his appointments to various committees.
In addition, on June 9, 2020, the City Council individually provided comments under the Council
Comments portion of the agenda regarding the peaceful protests and racial equity conversations
that are taking place in the community. Through those comments, the City Council expressed a
desire for additional work and effort to be undertaken with respect to this important subject matter.
It is therefore recommended that the City Council not only review the committee list to make
appointments to the vacated positions resulting from the resignation, but also provide direction on
whether a new subcommittee is desired to work with staff in the racial equity and community
engagement space. If the consensus is that all Council Members would like to equally participate
in this space without a subcommittee, staff will proceed with the development of a comprehensive
agenda item for the first meeting of July.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENT: City Council Committee Assignments List
2020 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
Commission Liaison One Member
Current Member
Community Services Commission
Schwank
Old Town Local Review Board
Schwank
Planning Commission
Naggar
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Stewart
Standing Committees (Two Members)
Current Members
Arts and Cultural Affairs Subcommittee
Edwards, Schwank
City Sustainability Program Subcommittee
Rahn, Stewart
E-Government and Temecula Outreach Subcommittee
Edwards, Stewart
Economic Development Subcommittee
Edwards, Stewart
Old Town Steering Subcommittee
Naggar, Schwank
Finance Subcommittee
Edwards, Stewart
Infrastructure Beautification Subcommittee
Edwards, Stewart
Joint City Council/TVUSD Subcommittee
Rahn, Schwank
Military Subcommittee
Rahn, Schwank
Move 1-15 Through Temecula Valley Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
Murrieta/Temecula Subcommittee
Edwards, Naggar
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Subcommittee
Schwank, Stewart
Public Works Subcommittee
Edwards, Stewart
Southwest Cities Coalition Subcommittee
Edwards, Schwank
Representative Assignments
(External Organizations - Stipend Not Included)
Current Member(s)
Animal Shelter Liaison/JPA Representative
Stewart
League of California Cities — Voting Delegate
Rahn, (Alternate Stewart)
National League of Cities — Voting Delegate
Rahn, Alternate Stewart
Pechan a Tribal Council Representative
Naggar
Rancho California Water District Liaison
Stewart, (Alternate Schwank)
Southwest Riverside County Energy Authority (SRCEA) JPA
Edwards, Schwank
Temecula Sister City Liaison
Stewart
Representative Assignments
External Organizations — May Include Stipend
Current Member(s)
RCA Representative
Edwards, (Alternate Stewart)
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Board
Stewart, (Alternate Edwards)
Riverside County Transportation Commission
Naggar, Alternate Edwards
Riverside Transit Agency Representative
Schwank, Alternate Edwards
WRCOG Executive Committee and Zone Committee
Stewart, (Alternate Schwank)
Ad Hoc Committees Two Members
Current Members
Altair Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Edwards, Stewart
Diaz Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
French Valley Parkway Interchange Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
General Plan Update Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Edwards, Rahn
Higher Education Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
Human Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Edwards, Stewart
Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
Luxury Car Dealership Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Edwards, Rahn
Margarita Recreation Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Schwank
Murrieta Creek Project Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Rahn, Schwank
Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Schwank
Promenade in Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Edwards, Schwank
Public Safety Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Rahn, Stewart
Roripaugh Ranch (aka Sommers Bend) Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Edwards, Stewart
Service Level Assessments Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Rahn, Schwank
Short Term Vacation Rentals Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Rahn, Stewart
Strategic Fiscal Planning Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Edwards, Stewart
Supportive Housing/Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
Trails / Open Space Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Schwank
TVE2 (Small Business Incubator) Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Rahn, Stewart
Uptown Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Edwards, Naggar
Winchester Hills Ad Hoc Subcommittee
Naggar, Rahn
Ad Hoc Subcommittees are formed for a specific limited purpose and operate for a limited time
until its purposes are fulfilled ("ad hoc") as opposed to "standing committees" that have continuing
subject matter jurisdiction. The descriptions of the purposes and duration of the ad hoc
subcommittees are as follows:
Altair Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide staff direction on
development options for the property located west of Pujol below the western escarpment.
Development on this property would include the construction of the Western By -Pass Corridor
and has potential for an "in town" residential neighborhood adjacent to Old Town. The term of this
subcommittee is through the completion of the development and disposition of the property.
Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee reviews funding
applications from various non-profit organizations requesting Community Service funding for the
year. This subcommittee will meet in September/October 2020 and will make specific
recommendations to the City Council for fiscal year 2020-2021 Community Service funding.
Diaz Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee is responsible for evaluating and
negotiating terms and conditions associated with the disposition and development of the Agency
owned property located at the North West Corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway. The term of
this subcommittee is through the completion of the development or disposition of the property.
French Valley Parkway Interchange Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee shall work with
representatives from Caltrans, Federal Highways, and elected officials at the city, state, and
federal levels. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the construction of the
interchange project.
General Plan Update Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide direction and
recommendations relating to the General Plan update project, which will kick-off with updating
several supporting components including the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), Housing
Element, Circulation Element. The term of this subcommittee is through the adoption of a
comprehensive General Plan Update.
Higher Education Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee is responsible for attracting and
facilitating the development of a higher education facility and programs in the City of Temecula,
including the new higher education complex acquired by MSJC and expansion of CSUSM in the
City. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by December
2020.
Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will monitor and provide feedback on the
implementation of the development plan for the existing Temecula Valley Hospital. It is anticipated
that this subcommittee will need to continue through the implementation of the development plan.
Human Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will evaluate services and programs
related to special needs, homelessness, senior citizens and mental health awareness to identify
non-profit stakeholders to enhance and coordinate delivery of these services. This subcommittee
will also review funding associated with these programs and services for Fiscal Year 2020-2021
and report back on its recommendations to the City Council by December 2020.
Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee — While this subcommittee will not be
negotiating individual infill projects, the subcommittee will be working closely with staff to identify
and consider potential infill sites in 2020, ensuring consistency with the City's General and Growth
Management Plans and zoning designations.
Luxury Car Dealership Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee is responsible for the
attraction of luxury car dealerships to the City. Auto sales represent a large percentage of sales
tax revenue to the City and the expansion and attraction of dealerships will preserve a revenue
stream to maintain City services. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its
recommendations by December 2020.
Margarita Recreation Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will work with staff to
explore concepts for an intergenerational recreation and human services facility and provide input
based upon community workshops and needs assessments during the design process. The term
of this subcommittee is through the completion of the renovations at the Margarita Recreation
Center.
Murrieta Creek Project Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide direction and
recommendations that involve the Army Corps of Engineers Project that improves Murrieta Creek
to provide added flood protection. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the
Murrieta Creek Improvement Project.
Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee is responsible for evaluating
and negotiating terms and conditions associated with the disposition and development of the
Agency owned property located adjacent to the Town Square along Main Street in Old Town. The
term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the adjacent properties.
Promenade in Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee would provide direction and
review of any potential development applications associated with the City's regional mall in 2020.
This subcommittee will meet on an as -needed basis and will report back to the City Council with
appropriate recommendations by December 2020.
Public Safety Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will work with staff to monitor the
County's efforts to implement the KPMG law enforcement efficiency review, and evaluate and
discuss the City's own public safety operations, efficiencies, and other items related to the joint
powers authority conversation. This subcommittee will also provide direction on efforts to
construct a public safety memorial as referenced in the existing CIP. The term of this
subcommittee will be through the completion of the County's implementation of the review and
completion of the construction of the public safety memorial.
Roripaugh Ranch (aka Sommers Bend) Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will monitor
and report on the issues affecting the Community Facility District Bonds, and development issues
affecting the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the development now known as Sommers Bend.
The term of this subcommittee is through the build out of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan.
Service Level Assessments Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide staff
direction regarding landscape maintenance zones throughout the City, proposal(s) for new
assessments, public outreach and recommendations to the full City Council. The term of this
subcommittee will be through the completion of the Proposition 218 process through December
2020.
Short Term Vacation Rentals Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide staff
direction on the development of regulations pertaining to the use and operation of short-term
vacation rental businesses. The term of this subcommittee is through the completion of the
adoption of a related ordinance.
Strategic Fiscal Planning Ad Hoc Subcommittee —This subcommittee will provide direction
regarding fiscal policies and strategies related to new revenue streams and a new User Fee
Study. The term of this subcommittee is through 2020.
Supportive Housing/Services Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will work with staff to
identify and implement solutions to provide both housing and supportive services for families and
individuals who meet the criteria of Extremely Low, Very Low and Low Income by evaluating
affordable housing development opportunities utilizing remaining affordable housing bond
proceeds. The subcommittee will make recommendations regarding the selected developments
responding to the Request for Proposals for Affordable Housing issued in 2017. The term of this
subcommittee is through the expenditure of the available Affordable Housing bond proceeds.
Trails and Open Space Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will provide direction and
input on the efforts underway to enhance existing trails, complete trail connections, as well as
consider additional possible trail ways for multi -purpose uses including equestrian, pedestrian,
and cycling. This subcommittee also provides staff direction on potential annexations of areas
within the City's Sphere of Influence and potential purchase of permanent open space property
similar to property purchased along the escarpment west of the City limit which was purchased
by the City and deeded to the RCA. It is anticipated that this subcommittee will need to continue
through 2020.
TVE2 (Small Business Incubator) Ad Hoc Subcommittee —This subcommittee will evaluate
policies and procedures related to incubator use and application selection. This subcommittee
will also review applications from developing entrepreneurs for incubator use and selection in
2019 and make related recommendations to the City Council by December 2020.
Uptown Temecula Ad Hoc Subcommittee — City Council has given staff direction to analyze the
redevelopment of Uptown Temecula, the City's first commercial district. This subcommittee will
provide staff with direction as we analyze the potential for an urbanized extension of Old Town
including increased commercial and corporate office opportunities as well as mixed use
residential development and the initial implementation of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan and
the In -Lieu Road Fee. The term of this subcommittee is through the implementation of the Uptown
Temecula Specific Plan.
Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This subcommittee will work with staff to make
recommendations regarding community members who have made significant contributions to the
City of Temecula in 2020. This subcommittee is needed on an ongoing basis to potentially
recognize outstanding citizens.
Winchester Hills Ad Hoc Subcommittee — This Subcommittee will work with staff and the property
owner, to provide direction on potential land use proposals for this approximately 100-acre vacant
property at the intersection of Date/Ynez Streets. The site will be bisected by the proposed French
Valley Interchange project. The site is currently zoned for Service Commercial land uses. The
property owner has indicated a desire to consider mixed -use development on the site which would
necessitate an amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan and the Winchester Hills Development
Agreement. The term of this subcommittee is through the disposition of the property.
Item No. 11
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report
PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Principal Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development
Department monthly report for May 2020.
VIRTUAL TRANSITION
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the virtual shift of many functions of the City, and Community
Development in particular. Community Development, in collaboration with Business License, Fire,
Land Development, Police, and IT, shifted all Permit Center services online in under one week.
Building and Safety has begun implementation of virtual inspections utilizing FaceTime. While
keeping the health and safety of staff and the community as the top priority, the division has been
able to increase the volume of inspections conducted, and keep projects moving with this new process.
Community Development was able to resume public hearings and meetings beginning in April by
shifting to virtual meetings, conducted via Zoom webinars.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Planning processed 40 new applications and conducted seven (7) Public Hearings in May. A detailed
account of planning activities is attached to this report.
Plan Type
May 2020
Conditional Use Permit
2
Extension of Time
2
Home Occupations
15
Maps
3
Modifications
10
Pre-Applicatian
1
Assessary Dwelling Unit
2
Temporary Use Permit
1
Zoning or Planning Letter
3
Total
40
Woodspring Suites (PA20-0072): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately
60,600 square foot, four-story, 130 room Woodspring Suites Hotel located on the west side of
Madison Avenue between Buecking Drive and McCabe Court. (COOPER)
Winchester Hills Specific Plan Amendment (PAs18-0660 and 18-0661): The City is processing a
Specific Plan Amendment to the Winchester Hills Specific Plan for a Residential Overlay within
portions of Planning Area 12, allowing up to 1,000 residential units; and a General Plan Amendment
to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designations for Planning Area 12 to Specific Plan
Implementation (SPI). The project is located on the corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. (COOPER)
Heirloom Farms (PAs 18-0659, 18-0660, 18-0661): The City is processing a Development Plan to
allow for the construction of 321-unit single-family community on 27.86 acres consisting of detached
homes, attached townhomes, and duplexes. Community meetings were held on June 19, 2018 and
February 20, 2020, and further outreach will take place prior to a public hearing. The City is working
with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis. The project is located on the corner of Date
Street and Ynez Road. (COOPER)
Arrive @ Rancho Highlands (PA19-1448): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 270-
unit multi -family community adjacent to the Temecula Duck Pond, southeast of Rancho California
Road on Ynez Road. The project includes leasing offices, clubhouse, fitness center, pool, tot lot, and
dog park. The project is located within the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The project proposes
20% of the units (55 units) as affordable at or below 60% average median income. (COOPER)
Solana Assisted Living (PAs19-0940 and 19-0941): The City is processing a Development Plan and
Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an approximately 91,002 square foot, two story, 107
unit assisted living and memory care facility located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and
Solana Way. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project by a consultant and the
public review and commenting period is from May 27, 2020 to June 27, 2020. (COOPER)
Lantern Crest Temecula (PA19-1452, PA20-0530): The City is processing a Modification to a
previously approved Development Plan (PA17-0328) for an approximately 526,762 square foot, four-
story, 494 unit, independent and assisted living community; and a Minor Exception for a 4'-9"
increase in allowable building height for architectural elements. The project is located at the southeast
corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. The project site was previously approved as the WESTliving
Assisted Living Facility in the Winchester Hills Specific Plan. This project is scheduled for Planning
Commission on June 17, 2020. (COOPER)
Sommers Bend Home Product Review (PAs 20-0328, 20-0329, and 20-0330): The City is
processing the second phase of a single-family residential home product review for Sommers Bend.
This phase is all age -qualified homes encompasses three villages located in PAs 22, 23A, and 24, for
a total of 192 units. All three are scheduled for Planning Commission on July 15, 2020. (COOPER)
Sommers Bend Age Qualified Private Recreation Center (PA20-0278): The City is processing a
Development Plan for the Sommers Bend age qualified private recreation center consisting of an
approximately 11,159 square foot clubhouse building (including a fitness center, multi -purpose room,
and kitchen), pool, spa, pickleball courts, bocce ball, group BBQ, yoga lawn, cabanas, and 45 parking
spaces located within PA23B at Sommers Bend. This project is scheduled for Planning Commission
on July 15, 2020. (COOPER)
Roripaugh Ranch - Wingsweep Tract Maps (PAs 20-0567, 20-0568, 20-0569): The City is
processing three Tentative Tract Maps (TTM) for the remaining three non -entitled residential
planning areas of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan: TTM 37925 (PA10) for the creation of 13 single
family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin; TTM 37928 (PA33A) for the creation of 15
single family lots, 5 open space lots, and a water quality basin; TTM 37928 (PA33A) for the creation
of 15 single family lots, 5 open space lots, and a water quality basin. (COOPER)
MS Mountain View Industrial Buildings (PAs 20-0533, 20-0534, 20-0535, and 20-0536): The
City is processing four (4) separate industrial buildings located on individual lots along Avenida
Alvarado. The square footage of each individual building is 15,641 square feet, 14,544 square feet,
15,944 square feet, and 11,824 square feet. (COOPER)
LONG RANGE PLANNING
Temporary Expanded Outdoor Dining and Retail in Old Town: As the State of California, and
Riverside County Public Health loosen restrictions related to the COVID 19 pandemic, City Council
has directed staff to implement multiple programs (Temecula Revive) that accelerate local economic
activity while maintaining compliance with all State or County mandates. Staff has developed the
Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program to assist businesses during these challenging times. On
Friday, May 29, 2020, the City Council Old Town Steering Subcommittee (Naggar/Schwank)
received a presentation from staff regarding the proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail
program. At the conclusion of that meeting, the City Council Subcommittee directed staff to bring
the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail proposal to the City Council on June 9, 2020. Staff received
fourteen public comments regarding the proposed program. All comments were supportive of the
Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program. (RABIDOU, WATSON)
Old Town Specific Plan Amendment (LR20-0209): Staff prepared an amendment to the Old Town
Specific Plan to allow for four-story hotels in the Downtown Core District. Previously, outside of
the Hotel Overlay District, the Specific Plan only allowed four-story buildings in the Downtown Core
District when at least one floor is residential or when one floor is office and parking is provided for
that floor. Staff worked with Ascent Environmental to prepare an EIR Addendum for the project and
presented the Specific Plan Amendment to the Planning Commission on May 6, 2020, and the City
Council approved the Specific Plan Amendment on May 26, 2020. (FISK)
CEQA Traffic Impact Analysis - VMT Thresholds and Guidelines (LR18-1506): The City has
been selected by Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG), through the Sustainable
Communities Program, to update the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to facilitate
compliance with SB 743 Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT). The City's TIA Guidelines provide a
methodology for assessing potential traffic and circulation impacts of proposed projects. The
Guidelines use Level of Service (LOS) based on intersection delay to analyze impacts to intersections
and roadway segments. The City will transition the Guidelines from LOS based to VMT based before
the state deadline of July 1, 2020. Staff is working with Fehr & Peers to update the Guidelines to
include VMT methodology, thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures. On January 28 and
April 23, 2020, Staff met with the General Plan Update Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tern
Edwards and Council Member Rahn. The Planning Commission approved the Guidelines on April
22. On April 23, the project was presented to the Public Traffic Safety Commission. On May 26,
2020, the City Council of the City of Temecula voted 5-0 to approve the CEQA Transportation VMT
Analysis Guidelines. (TOMA)
Old Town Parking Study (LR17-1502): Staff is working with Fehr & Peers to update the 2010 Old
Town Parking Management Plan. The Plan will take a detailed look at existing parking policies,
standards, supply and demand within the study area, as well as the effect that planned future
development and recently approved projects will have on future demand. The study will also identify
strategies and standards for management of the parking supply. Per direction provided by the City
Council Old Town Subcommittee, consisting of Council Members Naggar and Schwank, staff
presented the study findings to the Old Town Local Review Board on October 14, 2019. On December
10, 2019, staff provided an update to the Subcommittee. Staff has presented the findings to the Public
Traffic/Safety Commission and Community Services Commission. Staff will present the findings to
the Planning Commission Old Town Subcommittee and the full Planning Commission. (JONES)
Objective Design and Development Standards (LR18-1684): The City received an SB 2 Grant
from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to update the Objective
Design and Development Standards for multi -family and mixed -use residential developments, with
the goal of expediting housing production, streamlining approval processes, and establishing the
foundation for future regulations and housing laws. Staff is working on creating Objective Design
Standards that will conform with SB 35, as well as to incorporate objective design guidelines into the
City's Development Code. (TOMA, RABIDOU)
Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Park Service on the Waves to Wineries Trail
Plan. The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by
identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. The goals are to identify
existing trails and implement a strategy to fill in the missing links. (PETERS)
HOUSING
Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City has received a formal Development Plan for
a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a
community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council
approved a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable
housing tax allocation bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. Entitlements are expected to be completed
in June 2020, and CHW will apply for funding through the State of California in July. (LEHNER,
RABIDOU, WATSON)
Mission Village Rehabilitation: The City partnered with Affirmed Housing for modifications to
their regulatory agreements on the existing Mission Village Affordable Housing Complex. This will
result in the complete rehabilitation of the complex and secure affordable covenants for an additional
55 years. The modifications to the agreement were approved by City Council on August 13, 2019.
The County Oversight Board approved the modifications on September 5, 2019, and the State
Department of Finance approved the project on October 18, 2019. The construction loan for the
rehabilitation project closed on March 14th. As part of the negotiations, the City received an
additional $1.3 million to use towards the development of affordable housing. Construction for the
rehabilitation will begin in 2020. (LEHNER, WATSON)
Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA
with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units on
City -owned property on Pujol Street. Temecula Pacific Associates is looking to secure financing from
the State of California prior to the commencement of construction. (LEHNER, WATSON)
Housing Element Update (LR18-1620 and LR17-1757): The City is working with De Novo
Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the RHNA
process, community engagement, and CEQA. The current Housing Element was certified by the
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation
for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint
for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the
population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of
Mayor Pro Tern Edwards and Council Member Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad
Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Youmans, will serve as advisory bodies
during the process. (WEST, TOMA, PETERS)
Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) (LR17-1757): Running concurrently with the
Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA planning
cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October 2029. On May 7, 2020, the
SCAG Regional Council delayed adoption of the Connect SoCal for up to 120 days. After the
adoption of Connect SoCal, each local jurisdiction will receive formal notification from SCAG on
their draft RHNA allocation. The Final RHNA Allocation is anticipated in October 2020. (WEST)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
Temecula Assist: On Thursday, May 21, 2020, during the City Council Budget Workshop, the
Temecula City Council gave the greenlight to a half million dollars in aid for Temecula small
businesses. The program, branded as "Temecula Assist," is a set of two small business emergency
relief grants designated for Temecula business owners coping with the financial effects of the
COVID-19 pandemic. Temecula Assist is comprised of two grants: Rent Recovery and Job Retention
Grant (funded through CDBG-CV) and a Business Improvement Grant (funded through the General
Fund). The application period is May 26 through June 9. The Substantial Amendment to the 2019-
20 CDBG Annual Action Plan will be heard at a public hearing at City Council on June 9, 2020. The
grant program is expected to assist 67 local businesses. (LEHNER)
CDBG Administration: The 2020-21 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for CDBG funding
was released in November 2019. Two technical workshops were held for applicants on December 12,
2019. The Finance Committee provided recommendations for the 2020-21 program on March 10,
2020. City Council approved the following recommendations on April 28, 2020. (LEHNER)
Organization
Project Name
Finance
Program Description Committee
0 [11 Recommendation]
Assistance League of Temecula Valley
Operation School Bell
Clothing & supplies for low$5,491
income students in TVUSD
Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County
Before and After School Care
Round trip school transportation;
$5,491
activities before and after school
Canine Support Teams, I nc.
Service Dogs for Disabled
Provide service and assistance
$5,491
Persons
dogs to people with disabilities.
Homeless Prevention and
Connecting homeless individuals
City of Temecula
with services and financial
$20,000
Diversion Program
assistance
Community Mission of Hope
Housing Resource Center
Provide case management for
$5,491
homeless; food pantry
Fair Housing Council of Riverside County
Comprehensive Fair Housing
Fair housing education, training,
technical assistance; landlord/
$20,000
Program
tenant mediation
Hospice of the Valleys
Senior Assistance Program
Provide direct costs of hospice
$5,491
care for senior citizens
Anti Violence Education and
Provide support and services to
Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center
Crisis Intervention
survivors of sexual assault
$5,491
Safe Alternatives for Everyone(SAFE)
Creating SAFE Families
Victim awareness; case
$5,491
management; support for victims
Voices for Children
Court Appointed Special
Case management and advocacy
$5,491
Advocate (CASA) Program
for foster children in Temecula
Total Public Service Funds Requested for 2020-21
$83,928
BUILDING & SAFETY
Building and Safety statistics for May 2020 are highlighted in the following table. Additional statistics
are attached to this report.
Building & Safety Statistics
May 2020
Perm its
198
New Single Family Units
22
New Commercial Building
0
Photovoltaic
29
Tenant Improvements
11
Non Construction C of O
9
Number of Active Plan Checks
495
Number of New Plan Checks
241
Number of Finaled Permits
146
Inspections
Inspections Per Day
77.2
Inspections Per Person Per Day
Stops Per Month
Visitors to Counter
0
New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check
• Truax Hotel (161,586 sf)
• Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 sf)
• Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 sf each)
• Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos)
• iA Robotics (24,659 sf)
• Hotel (38,202 sf) on Jefferson and Winchester
• Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 sf)
• Trinity Lutheran Church Preschool (9,530 sf)
• Temecula Valley Lexus Dealership (54,898 sf)
Tenant Improvement
• Bottega Italia — 28475 Old Town Front Street
• Mountain Mike's Pizza — 27644 Ynez Road
• Nana's Tamales — 28286 Old Town Front Street
• Los Panchos Mexican Gill Seafood and Cantina — 41301 Margarita Road
CODE ENFORCEMENT
During the month of May, Code Enforcement responded to 91 web inquiries. In addition, the division
opened 135 code cases, conducted 202 inspections, and forwarded 34 referrals.
Type of Code Case
May 2020
Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle
7
Vacant Home / Prop. Maintenance / Rodent/ Mold
2
Business ar Home Occupation w/o license/CUP
5
Trash and Debris {Dumping
Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds/ Fire Hazard
23
Green Poal / Vector Control {Stagnant Water
Graffiti
7
Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control
Trailer/ RV stored/Boat/Parking
11
Construction w/a Permit/Building Code
Encroach Public ROW /Trash Cans
10
Zoning/signs
12
Public Safety & Health
23
Tota I N u m ber of Cases
13s
Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor
foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties.
Foreclosure Tracking
May 2020
Residential - Default
45
Residential- Foreclosure
57
Residential - REO
39
Total - Residential
Commercial - Default
0
Commercial - Foreclosure
1
Commercial - RED
3
Total - Commercial
4
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Current Planning Activity Report
2. Community Development Statistics
3. Community Development Charts
PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company
Owner Plan Type Status
PA20-0566 27535 Jefferson Ave 909-240-023 Eric Jones 05/01/2020
Steve Rawlings
Hilbert Group PL Conditional Out
Temecula, CA 92590
Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Temecula Weddings and Event Center Conditional Use Permit: A Conditional Use
Permit to allow a wedding and event center to sell beer, wine, and distilled spirits with a Type 47 License at
27535 Jefferson Avenue.
PA20-0567 964-460-007 Scott Cooper 05/04/2020
Thomas Fuller
Wingsweep Corp PL Maps Plan Review
Case Title / Description: Roripaugh Ranch Tentative Tract Map 37925 (PA10): A Tentative Tract Map (TTM
37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin for Planning Area
10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II
PA20-0568 964-460-009 Scott Cooper 05/04/2020
Thomas Fuller
Wingsweep Corp PL Maps Plan Review
Case Title / Description: Roripaugh Ranch Tentative Tract Map 37926 (PA12): A Tentative Tract Map (TTM
37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin for Planning Area
12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II
PA20-0569 964-460-018 Scott Cooper 05/04/2020
Thomas Fuller
Wingsweep Corp PL Maps Plan Review
Case Title / Description: Roripaugh Ranch Tentative Tract Map 37928 (PA33A): A Tentative Tract Map (TTM
37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots, 5 open space lots, and a water quality basin for Planning Area
33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II
PA20-0571 28495 Old Town Front St 922-026-008 Eric Jones 05/05/2020 05/11/2020
Michael Wardlaw
CELIA PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
SANCHEZ
Case Title / Description: 28495 Old Town Front Street Minor Mod (Planning Review Only): A Modification
application (Planning Review Only) to allow wood roof shingles to be replaced with asphalt roof shingles. The
project is located at 28495 Old Town Front Street.
PA20-0574 46135 Grace Ct 962-410-026 Jaime Cardenas 05/07/2020 05/07/2020
Jacqueline
CAM THACH PI -Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Bonaparte
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Martin Financial Services: a home occupation business license for real estate
brokering services.
PA20-0576 40037 Amberley Cir 957-162-014 Jaime Cardenas 05/07/2020 05/07/2020
Denise Marie
PI -Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Chandler
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Something Lettered Designs: a home occupation business license for wedding
stationery, calligraphy and signage services.
Page 1 of 6
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company
Owner Plan Type
Status
PA20-0579 30788 Eastgate Pky 957-550-011 Jaime Cardenas 05/08/2020 05/12/2020
Kimberly Trask
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Bronzed Booty Sunless Tan: a home occupation business license for mobile
tanning services.
PA20-0580 43127 Corte Calanda 955-172-007 Jaime Cardenas 05/08/2020 05/12/2020
Tiffany Singler
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Tiffany Case Singler Ballet Instruction: a home occupation business license for
ballet instruction services.
PA20-0586 44225 Festivo St 959-301-003 Eric Jones 05/11/2020
David Arneson
Joan McCarthy PL Secondary
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
Dwelling Unit
Case Title / Description: Joan McCarthy Accessory Dwelling Unit: A 1,150 square foot accessory dwelling
unit located 44225 Festivo Street.
PA20-0588 41852 Marwood Cir 921-581-001 Jaime Cardenas 05/12/2020
Arturo Dicochea
SIV CHENG PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Gonzalez Shed MOD: a modification application for a detached 16' x 24' storage
shed at the rear yard of the existing single family home located at 41852 Marwood Circle.
PA20-0590 41307 Rue Jadot 953-490-001 Jaime Cardenas 05/12/2020 05/12/2020
Surya Von Rosen
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: California Serve: a home occupation business license to provide legal services.
PA20-0592 27711 Diaz Rd 921-030-002 Jaime Cardenas 05/12/2020 05/14/2020
Tiffany Golson
RBI TEMECULA PL Zoning or
Completed
Temecula, CA 92590
PROP Planning Letter
Case Title / Description: Light Industrial ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 27711 Diaz
Road (APN 921-030-002).
PA20-0593 43050 Calle Cristal 944-332-040 Jaime Cardenas 05/13/2020 05/14/2020
Alex Wilkinson
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: SecurityNational Mortgage Company: a home occupation business license for
broker, stock and securities services and consulting.
PA20-0595 33343 Decada St 962-323-028 Jaime Cardenas 05/13/2020 05/14/2020
Mateo Willis
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Willis Pool Company: a home occupation business license for pool cleaning
services.
Page 2 of 6
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA20-0597 44274 George Cushman Ct 960-020-042 Jaime Cardenas 05/13/2020 05/18/2020 Lauren Colson MPCW PL Zoning or Completed
Temecula, CA 92592 REDHAWK Planning Letter
OWNER
Case Title / Description: 44274 George Cushman Court ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property
located at 44274 George Cushman Court (APN 960-040-042).
PA20-0598 41257 Margarita Rd 921-830-002 Jaime Cardenas 05/14/2020
Judy Doss
PFP TEMECULA PL Zoning or
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
REAL ESTATE
Planning Letter
HOLDINGS
Case Title / Description: 41257 Margarita Zoning Letter: a zoning letter for the property located at 41257
Margarita Road, Suite B103 (921-830-002).
PA20-0599 44551 La Paz Rd 922-240-082 Jaime Cardenas 05/14/2020 05/18/2020
Nathaniel Lohli
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: UAS 3D Solutions LLC: a home occupation business license for designing
computer imaging and mapping solutions.
PA20-0600 43564 Savona St 959-281-036 Jaime Cardenas 05/15/2020 05/18/2020
Courtnie Stauffer
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: FAWN Clothing Co.: a home occupation business license for online retail sales of
apparel clothing.
PA20-0601 28848 Bristol Rd 916-353-003 Jaime Cardenas 05/15/2020 05/18/2020
Zsanna Marble
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Zsanna Marble, LMFT: a home occupation business license for marriage and family
therapy counseling services.
PA20-0604 28495 Old Town Front St 922-026-008 Eric Jones 05/19/2020 06/02/2020
Michael Wardlaw
CELIA
PL Modifications
Approved
Temecula, CA 92590
SANCHEZ
Case Title / Description: Texas Lil's Minor Modification (Planning Review Only): A Minor Modification
Application (Planning Review Only) to allow paint color revisions to an existing commercial structure located at
28495 Old Town Front Street.
PA20-0605 31853 Via Tafalla 955-322-034 Jaime Cardenas 05/19/2020 05/20/2020
Seth Woolson
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Coastal Refrigeration Heating & Air: a home occupation business license for HVAC
heating & cooling services.
PA20-0607 33311 Avenida Bicicleta 960-124-013 Jaime Cardenas 05/19/2020 05/20/2020
GUILLERMO
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
PINA
Occupation
Case Title / Description: McPina Technology Services: a home occupation business license for computer
repair, networking and photography services.
Page 3 of 6
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date
Applicant Company
Owner Plan Type Status
PA20-0609 33079 Puffin St 962-430-013 Jaime Cardenas 05/19/2020 05/20/2020
Heather Ann
PL Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Ramaha
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Healthy Acupuncture: a home occupation business license for acupuncture
services and alternative health consultations.
PA20-0611 43500 Villa Del Sur Dr 959-040-003 Jaime Cardenas 05/19/2020
Gary Ingram
RUBEN BACA PL Secondary Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
Dwelling Unit
Case Title / Description: Baca ADU: an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) application to convert part of an
existing barn structure and expand it to total as an 826 square foot ADU at the rear of the existing single-family
home located at 43500 Villa Del Sur Drive.
PA20-0612 31241 Comotilo Ct 918-292-045 Jaime Cardenas 05/20/2020 05/26/2020
JOSE PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
GUTIERREZ
Case Title / Description: Gutierrez Addition MOD: a modification application with a proposed 307 square
foot addition to expand the kitchen and living room of the existing single-family home located at 31241
Comotilo Court.
PA20-0613 31700 Temecula Pky 959-080-026 Jaime Cardenas 05/20/2020
Sanveer Chhina
TEMECULA PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592
VALLEY
HOSPITAL INC
Case Title / Description: Temecula Valley Hospital EV Chargers MOD: a modification application for the
installation of five (5) electric vehicle charging stations at the Hospital located at 31700 Temecula Parkway.
PA20-0614 42375 Remington Ave 909-370-036 Jaime Cardenas 05/20/2020
Jeffrey Miller
5670 PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
TEMECULA
Case Title / Description: Scott's Company Shade Structure MOD: a modification application to install a
lattice structure underneath the facade architectural element at the front of the building entrance located at
42375 Remington Avenue.
PA20-0615 27555 Ynez Rd 921-270-054 Eric Jones 05/21/2020
Melissa Tsai
Heritage PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Partners
Case Title / Description: Tower Plaza Modification Application (Planning Application Only): A Modification
Application (Planning Review Only) to allow for paint revisions for an existing commercial structure located at
27555 Ynez Road (Tower Plaza).
PA20-0616 28721 Old Town Front St 922-073-026 Eric Jones 05/26/2020 Neil Cleveland Neil Cleveland PL Extension of Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590 Time
Case Title / Description: First and Front Extension of Time: The first Extension of Time for a previously
approved Major Modification application for a commercial structure located at 28721 Old Town Front Street.
Page 4 of 6
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company
PA20-0617 28721 Old Town Front St 922-073-026 Eric Jones 05/26/2020 Neil Cleveland
Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: First and Front Extension of Time (CUP): The first Extension of Time application for
a previously approved Conditional Use Permit. The project is located at 28721 Old Town Front Street.
PA20-0618 28721 Old Town Front St 922-073-026 Eric Jones 05/26/2020 Neil Cleveland
Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: First and Front Modification Application (Planning Review Only): A Minor
Modification application (Planning Review Only) to allow revisions to originally approved COA timing
thresholds for a previously approved Major Modification. The project is located at 28721 Old Town Front
Street.
PA20-0619 30135 Rancho California Rd 944-370-008 Scott Cooper 05/26/2020 05/26/2020 Daniel Dobron
Temecula, CA 92592
Case Title / Description: Temecula Village Mail Room MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a
previously approved Development Plan (PA16-1427) to relocate the mail room from inside the leasing office to
a free standing approximately 338 square foot accessory structure on the project site. The project is located
at 30135 Rancho California Road.
Owner Plan Type Status
Neil Cleveland PL Extension of Plan Review
Time
Neil Cleveland PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula Village PL Modifications Approved
Development, LP
PA20-0621 31917 Jaybee Ln 962-580-029 Jaime Cardenas 05/26/2020 05/26/2020 Sharen Gloriani PL Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92592 Gomez Occupation
Case Title / Description: GrazefulleYours, LLC: a home occupation business license for charcuterie boards
and box arrangement and deliveries.
PA20-0623 31222 Mangrove Dr 961-430-054 Jaime Cardenas 05/26/2020 05/26/2020 Victoria Scarth PL Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation
Case Title / Description: Temecula Mediation: a home occupation business license for divorce mediation
services.
PA20-0624 44686 Longfellow Ave 961-450-007 05/27/2020 Erin Washington PL Home Plan Review
(Change Of Address) Occupation
Temecula, CA 92592
Case Title / Description: Erin Washington - Barber, Beauty, Nails
PA20-0627 964-640-010 Scott Cooper 05/28/2020 Jared Aronowitz
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend Model Home Complex (PAs22, 23A, 24): a Model Home Complex
for Planning Areas 22, 23A, and 24 of Sommers Bend for seven (7) model homes, a sales office, landscaping,
and parking lot.
WOODSIDE 05S PL Temporary Plan Review
Use Permit
Page 5 of 6
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA20-0628 41923 2nd St 922-043-027 Eric Jones 05/28/2020 Joe Holasek JIM MENDOZA PL Conditional Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Margarita's Restaurant Conditional Use Permit: A Conditional Use Permit to allow a
new restaurant to obtain a California Alcoholic Beverage Control Type 47 License and offer live entrainment.
The project is located at 41923 2nd Street, Suite 106
PA20-0629 28588 Old Town Front St 922-033-021 Eric Jones 05/28/2020 Jeff Lohman
Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: Top Spin Pizza & Pong Modification: A Modification application to allow for facade
improvements to the second floor of an existing commercial structure located at 28588 Old Town Front Street.
Ronald Darling PL Modifications Plan Review
PREAPP20-0 27985 Diaz Rd 921-040-041 Jaime Cardenas 05/07/2020 John Avila M & D Prop PL Plan Review
577 Temecula, CA 92590 Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: Diaz Road Hydrogen Fueling Station Pre-app: a pre -application to review a
proposed hydrogen fueling station adjacent to the Downs Energy fuel station site (27985 Diaz Road). The
project site is located at 28011 Diaz Road (APN 921-040-040).
Page 6 of 6
Community Development Statistics - Previous 12 Months
6/19
7/19
8/19
9/19
10/19
11/19
12/19
1/20
2/20
3/20
4/20
5/20
12 Month
Total/Average
BUILDING AND SAFETY
Inspections
1,393
1,552
1,862
1,897
2,072
1,591
1,606
1,788
1,999
1,025
1,754
1,544
20,083
Inspections Per Day
69.65
70.54
84.63
82.47
90.08
88.38
82.36
85.14
105.2
44.1
78.7
77.2
80
Inspections Per Person Per Day
17.41
17.63
21.15
16.49
22.52
20.1
20.6
21.29
26.3
20.1
19.9
19.3
20
Permits
257
293
372
241
296
260
288
270
280
336
159
198
3,250
New SFR Permits
3
9
16
1
41
57
64
0
35
39
0
22
287
New Projects in Plan Check
148
159
129
142
151
163
129
124
63
142
392
241
1,983
Number of Permits Finaled
151
147
163
159
185
160
206
216
160
120
110
146
1,923
Photovoltaic Permits
49
71
86
63
60
88
85
35
71
72
42
29
751
Non Construction C of O
39
23
28
27
30
19
27
35
28
20
5
9
290
Tenant Improvements w/ C of O
8
19
15
10
13
9
5
13
8
8
3
11
122
PLANNING
Public Hearings
3
2
4
3
3
5
1
3
8
0
6
7
45
Planning Applications*
36
34
25
30
38
41
48
29
35
30
32
24
402
Conditional Use Permits
3
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
11
Development Plans
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
4
0
12
Extensions of Time
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
General Plan Amendments
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Maps
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
Massage Permits
3
3
3
1
5
9
11
2
0
0
0
0
37
Modifications
11
18
12
14
16
11
17
5
10
13
6
10
143
Planned Dev. Overlays
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Accessory Dwelling Unit
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
4
2
1
1
2
14
Specific Plans - New
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SpecificPlans- Amendments
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Temporary Use Permits
3
3
5
2
4
4
6
4
6
9
1
1
48
LR Applications Initiated
1
0
1
3
2
4
5
4
6
1
3
0
30
Pre -Applications
6
3
2
6
1
5
3
7
4
3
2
1
43
Community Development Statistics - Previous 12 Months
6/19
7/19
8/19
9/19
10/19
11/19
12/19
1/20
2/20
3/20
4/20
5/20
12 Month
Total/Average
CODE ENFORCEMENT
0
Code Inspections
971
432
310
389
439
299
466
321
303
236
168
202
4,536
Code Enforcement Cases
137
194
129
198
179
105
74
129
119
127
112
135
1,638
Vehicle Abatement Cases
6
6
0
7
3
9
3
3
3
5
4
7
56
Annual Fire Inspection Code Cases
0
5
8
4
2
2
3
4
7
5
0
0
40
Weed Abatement Cases
15
28
17
16
20
9
0
12
9
8
8
23
165
ADMINISTRATION
Visitors to C Desk
1,067
1,072
1,112
999
1,232
928
979
1,211
1,038
363
0
0
10,001
Records Requests Processed
26
29
24
13
31
24
13
11
21
29
35
26
282
My CivicApp Inquiries
79
61
43
74
90
56
59
78
97
144
134
132
1,047
ECONOMIC INDICATORS
0
Residential - Default
52
53
58
55
56
53
53
53
54
61
52
45
645
Residential - Foreclosed
63
58
51
55
60
60
60
61
62
60
58
57
705
Residential REO
52
50
46
44
41
42
42
41
42
40
39
39
518
Commercial - Default
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
0
0
0
12
Commercial - Foreclosed
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
5
Commercial - RED
3
3
2
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
36
Home Occupations
26
23
28
21
22
24
27
55
43
20
13
16
318
* does not include Home Occupations
Communirg Development
Perlormance Report
Building Inspections
2072 1999
2000 1862 1897 1788
1754
1552 1591 1606 1544
1500 1393
1025
1000
500
0
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
New Building Permits
372
300 293 296
257 w 241
200
100
260
288 270 280
336
159
198
01
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
Finded Permits
III L
200
150
100
50
0
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
MAY
2020
iUAVG
OTAL
3250
AV6
146
01923
Visors ro the C Desk
1232 1211
1067 1072 1112
1038
1000 999 928 979
500
363
01 0 0
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
Records Requests Processed
0
20
10
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 1V19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
MU CivicApp Inquiries
150 1 144
50
AVG
833
TOTAL'
10,001
AVG
87.25
n1047
6/19 7119 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2120 3/20 4/20 5/20
''� The Community Development Desk, or C-Desk, is a one-
1w Wj
stop shop for development!
134 132
90 97
79 74 78
61 S6 59
43
Code Enrorcemenr Cases
oQ
200
150
100
50
0
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
Code Enrorcemenr Inspections
07.1
1000
750
500
250
0
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
Vehic e Abatement Cases
7.5
5
2.5
I
tOTAL
1638
AVG
202
TOTAL
4536
OTAL
56
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
' That you can report Code concerns via the City's app?
Planning Applications
AO
40
20
0
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
Modficahons
�o
15
10
5
x
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
Pre -Applications
5
2.5
0
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/20 2/20 3/20 4/20 5/20
Did A pre -application is an informal, free, and helpful tool for
• applicants to receive comments on potential projects.
L_ —,,A
Item No. 12
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: John Crater, Division Chief
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report
PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly
Report.
OF T E MFCG
•G1 {y
a City of Temecula Fire Department Report
1989
Incidents Reported for the month of April 2020 and City of Temecula and Both (Code 2, Alpha, Omega Code 3, Charlie, Delta, Bravo, Echo)
■ False Alarm
60 10.3%
Haz Mat
1
0.2°%
Medical
417
71.9%
Other Fire
7
1.2%
■ Other Misc
7
1 2%
Public Senice Assist 33
5.7°%
Res Fire
3
0.5°%
N Rescue
1
0.2°%
• Ringing Alarm
6
1.0°%
• Standby
12
2.1°%
Traffic Colfsion
29
5.0%
Vehicle Fire
2
0.3°%
Wldland Fire
2
0.3°%
Total:
580 100.0%
False Alarm
60
Haz Mat
1
Medical
417
Other Fire
7
Other Misc
7
Public Service Assist
33
Res Fire
3
Rescue
1
Ringing Alarm
6
Standby
12
Traffic Collision
29
Vehicle Fire
2
Wildland Fire
2
Incident Total; 580
�1 y.
4
1989
City of Temecula Fire Department Report L,
• 0
••w a
r • % • w� • . s1:r,,-5
• • • • evc� Nasa
• • •y. , r:.,.
• • • • • ••
40,
r «.
.••. •
• • • • �3• • • • •• •
.48
• • •�• w • _ -
•• • r • i � •
tit-
setir �.,�zz• • r-�; � >. aeon a: • • `i • • •
j '�_"�• • • • • ••_ •
r Jiy{ u�a *1 • • • i • • • N • ��
•
�x,
I f •
so
Call Comparison for Month and year to date
3
Month 2019 YTD 2020 YTD
April 741 580
Year Total 2925 2844
Legend
• Fka • MQtllcal Rinerz itle Coirrty Fie Stettin
• Hezvtl • Othc Msc
Hez Met • PSA Reservatims ' cosines
F T EMFCG
•G1 19
City of Temecula Fire Department Report1989
,H�o�
Fire Department Prevention Plan Review and Inspections
Review and Inskl=pections April Yeadate7
Plan Review 176 1053
Construction Inspections 84 632
Annual Inspections 742 1802
Counter/Public Inquiries 0 436
rMan
y
,..nPH d, .. I ■
Item No. 13
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Zachary Hall, Chief of Police
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (May 2020)
PREPARED BY: Steve DaSilva, Lieutenant
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for the month of
May 2020.
PATROL SERVICES
Overall calls for police service 5,999
"Priority One" calls for service 38
Average response time for "Priority One" calls 5.56
VOLUNTEERS
Chaplain
N/A
Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours
N/A
Reserve officer hours (patrol)
N/A
Explorer
N/A
Station/Administration
N/A
Total Volunteer hours
N/A
CRIME PREVENTION
Crime prevention workshops
N/A
Neighborhood watch meetings conducted
N/A
Safety presentations/Training
N/A
Special events
N/A
Residential/Business security surveys conducted
N/A
Businesses visited
N/A
Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up
N/A
Station Tour
N/A
Planning Review Projects
N/A
Temp Outdoor Use Permits
N/A
Sq. Footage of Graffiti Removed
314
Total customers served 73
Fingerprints/Live Scans 4
Police reports filed 65
Citations signed off 12
Total receipts $1,104
SPECIAL TEAMS (PROBLEM ORIENTED POLICING)
On sight felony arrests
3
On sight misdemeanor arrests
1
Felony arrest warrants served
0
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
2
Follow-up investigations
5
Parole/Probation Searches
2
Pedestrian Checks
6
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks
21
Crime Free Housing Checks
10
SPECIAL TEAMS (HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM)
On sight felony arrests
2
On sight misdemeanor arrests
2
Felony arrest warrants served
1
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
1
Area Checks
215
Camp Checks
15
Pedestrian Checks (New Contacts)
25
Follow-up Checks (Old Contacts)
15
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks...
8
SPECIAL TEAMS (SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM)
On sight felony arrests
4
On sight misdemeanor arrests
14
Felony arrest warrants served
1
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
0
Follow-up investigations
6
Parole/Probation Searches
3
Pedestrian Checks
0
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks...
0
Marijuana Dispensary Checks
0
SPECIAL TEAMS (Burglary Suppression Team)
Felony arrests
7
Felony filings
4
Total Cases Assigned
20
Total Cases Closed
17
Search Warrants Served
7
Citations issued for hazardous violations 711
Non -hazardous citations 80
Parking citations 64
Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 179
Seatbelts 23
Cell Phone Cites 64
Injury collisions 13
D.U.I. Arrests 17
Grant funded D.U.I. / Traffic safety checkpoints 0
Grant funded traffic click it or ticket 0
INVESTIGATIONS
Beginning Caseload
161
Total Cases Assigned
25
Total Cases Closed
22
Search Warrants
25
Arrests
6
Out of Custody Filings
5
PROMENADE MALL TEAM
Calls for service
90
Felony arrest/filings
0
Misdemeanor arrest/filings
1
Traffic Citations
0
Fingerprints/Live Scans
24
Total receipts
$1,432
SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS
Felony arrests N/A
Misdemeanor arrests N/A
Reports N/A
Citations N/A
Meetings/Presentations N/A
***Schools Closed Month of May***
Item No. 14
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 23, 2020
SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for
Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report
may also be viewed on the City's website at:
http://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-Improvement-Projects-CIP
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CIRCULATION PROJECTS
Butterfield Stage Road Extension - Phase III, PW15-11
Description: Widening of Butterfield Stage Road from La Serena Way to Rancho California Road, which includes
widening of Rancho California Road to four lanes through the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road
(Riverside County is a partner on this major circulation project).
Cost: $8,018,372
Status: Construction began on June 10, 2019.
Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25
Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry
Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch may be widened, extended, and/or improved to
create a contiguous Major Arterial segment.
Cost: $4,566,513
Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — May 2021. Current activities include development
and review of preliminary design alternatives.
French Valley Parkway / Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01
Description: Design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the
Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction
with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215.
Cost: $137,356,246
Status: Currently in design. Work continues on the environmental re-evaluation.
1
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02
Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula
Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp.
Cost: $7,775,000
Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — May 2021. Current activities include traffic operations
analyses, preliminary roadway design, initiation of noise study work program, and initiation of drainage
studies.
Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08
Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route
79 South.
Cost: $51,959,957
Status: Construction complete. Working with Caltrans on project closeout and acceptance. Project information is
available on the project website: www.1579South.info
Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05
Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road
and Winchester Road.
Cost: $14,307,394
Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. Request for
Authorization of Preliminary Engineering submitted to Caltrans on March 14, 2018. Design consultant has
been selected through the RFP process. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers
Inc. at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Design is underway. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved
by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. Pre -application meeting with RCA was held in
November 2019. First Joint Project Review (JPR) environmental submittal to RCA is anticipated in Spring
of 2020 and CEQA approval in Fall of 2020
oil
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Ynez Road (Winchester to Date), Equity Drive, County
Center Drive Loop, and Winchester Road (Nicolas to Easterly City Limits), PW18-01
Description: Rehabilitation of Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Date Street, Equity Drive and County Center Drive
loop, and Winchester Road from Nicolas Road to easterly City Limits.
Cost: $936,623
Status: Currently on hold awaiting completion of Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and Developer
improvements.
Pavement Rehabilitation Program — West Side Business Park Area, PW19-17
Description: Rehabilitation of Zevo Drive, Rio Nedo Road, Avenida Alvarado, Via Dos Picos, Business Park Drive, Del
Rio Road, Calle Cortez, Las Haciendas Street, Enterprise Circle North, and Via Montezuma from Murrieta
Creek to Jefferson Avenue.
Cost: $2,200,000
Status: Currently in design. Construction September 2020 — February 2021.
Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11
Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project
also includes relocating the access of the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from
Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane.
Cost: $1,032,674
Status: The project is currently in design.
3
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Ynez Road Improvements, PW17-17
Description This project includes widening Ynez Road, from Rancho Vista Road to La Paz Street, to two lanes in each
direction, and the completion of missing segments of curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscape medians,
streetlights and modification of the traffic signal at Santiago Road.
Cost: $4,571,766
Status: Design is at 60%. The design is scheduled to be completed during the FY 2020-2021.
M
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Citywide Streetlight Acquisition and Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit, PW17-18
Description: The purchase and acquisition of 7,279 light poles, including Phases 1, 2 & 3, of the Southern California
Edison (SCE) streetlights has been completed. Effective November 12, 2019, the City has assumed
ownership, and operations and maintenance of the streetlight poles located within the City limits. The Light
Emitting Diode (LED) lighting system retrofit and the installation of a wireless lighting control node system
for all streetlights Citywide has also been completed. SCE has offered a rebate for the lighting retrofit and
we anticipate receipt of rebate funds in late Summer 2020.
Cost: $8,003,311
Status: The purchase and acquisition, and LED retrofit of arterial and residential streetlights is complete. The SCE
rebate for the LED retrofit is anticipated to be received late Summer 2020.
Expanded Recycled Water Conversion Project, PW17-29
Description: The project includes the administration, design and construction of six (6) sites within the City for the
conversion of water facilities from potable to recycled water. This effort is in cooperation with Rancho
California Water District (RCWD) to administer the implementation of improvements in association with the
State of California Department of Water Resources Proposition 84 Grant Agreement.
Cost: $686,039
Status: Construction is underway and anticipated to be complete by August 2020.
Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19
Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula
Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe.
Cost: $3,887,550
Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — December 2020. Current activities include 60% design
plans and preparation of environmental revalidation studies.
5
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21
Description: Construction of a new recreation center in Margarita Community Park in place of the former YMCA building.
Includes demolition of the existing building and pool, and construction of a new building, as determined by
a feasibility study. Phase II includes the design and construction of an expansion of the current on -site
parking facility.
Cost: $8,656,508
Status: Concept Designs for Bridging Documents are underway. Design -Build Team Prequalification responses
were received on December 18, 2019 and staff is recommending to pre -qualify six firms at the February
25, 2020 City Council meeting. RFP for Design -Build Team was expected to be completed in April 2020
but project was placed on hold due to the Covid-19 situation. RFP will now be completed in June and
posted in July of 2020.
Old Town Parking Structure, PW17-15
Description: Design and eventual construction of a new parking facility in Old Town. The Old Town Parking Management
Plan will outline a number of parking strategies best suited to serve Old Town Temecula.
Cost: $1,000,000
Status: Parking study is being updated.
Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04
Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to
the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15
and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta
Creek trail.
Cost: $6,288,595
Status: Design is being finalized and the environmental document has been initiated. The California Transportation
Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP)
Augmentation funds for this project. Currently processing application for Caltrans Streamlined Oversite
and Encroachment Permit/Plan Check with Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC). Anticipate design to
be completed in February 2020. Resubmittal of Environmental Documents to RCA took place on January
2, 2020. ISMND circulation is scheduled for February 14 with City Council approval in April of 2020. CTC
request for construction fund authorization submitted in April for a June 2020 allocation; construction
bidding would follow shortly thereafter.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Sidewalks — Citywide (Third Street), PW17-24
Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side of Third Street, between Old Town Front Street and
Mercedes Street and the west side of Mercedes Street from Third Street for approximately 150' to the north.
Portion adjacent to the proposed parking structure for the hotel will be completed by private developer.
Cost: To be determined
Status: Design is almost complete. Project cannot be constructed until the Truax Hotel parking structure is under
construction due the change in street grade.
Sidewalks — Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement, PW17-16
Description: Replace boardwalk plank boards with colored concrete sidewalk.
Cost: $1,112,563
Status: Construction Contract was awarded at City Council meeting on June 25, 2019. Construction started on
August 12, 2019. Construction completed in May 2020.
Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28
Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road.
Cost: $198,920
Status: Project currently in design.
7
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
Eagle Soar Splash Pad Control System Renovation
Description: The project provides for the renovation and updating of the splash pad control system to meet current
Health & Safety requirements.
Cost: $200,000
Status: Control system design and installation due to be completed July 2020.
Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10
Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and
fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site.
Cost: $1,280,284
Status: Preparation of the environmental document is underway. Evaluating construction alternatives to lessen
environmental mitigation requirements. Geotechnical investigation for design alternatives performed in
mid -August 2019. Geotechnical report received October 1, 2019. Redesign started in February of 2020.
CEQA to be completed in summer of 2020.
Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06
Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball
Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Butterfield Stage Park and Vail Ranch
Park.
Cost: $1,127,800
Status: Project is currently in design.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing
Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and
federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks.
Cost: $5,157,649
Status: Playground renovations & replacements planned for FY20/21 include Sam Hicks, John Magee, Stephen
Michael Linen, and Winchester Creek Parks
Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03
Description: Design and construction of the restroom building expansion, including adding stalls and urinals. It also
includes renovating the snack bar, and enlarging the storage case.
Cost: $725,000
Status: Project is currently in design.
Sports Court Resurfacing
Description: Repairs and resurfacing of sport court surfacing at various parks and facilities. This includes tennis courts,
basketball courts, and hockey rinks at various parks.
Cost: $270,257
Status: Repairs and court resurfacing planned next year upon City Council approval of the Capital Improvement
Program Fiscal Years 2021-2025.
Sports Field Lighting — Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion
Description: Replacement of aging sports field lighting components with new LED technology at various sports parks.
Cost: $630,000
Status: Purchase and installation of Musco Lighting planned for Ronald Reagan Sports Park Upper Soccer Fields,
and Skate Park and Hockey Rink in FY20/21.
9
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS
Hilton Garden Inn
Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 66,991 square foot, three-story, 104 room
Hilton Garden Inn Hotel with underground parking and additional off -site parking located approximately
north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue.
Status: Permit issued October 4, 2019. Ongoing review of project by the Land Development division.
Mexico Cafe
Description: Grading plan and Street Improvement Plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 13,375 square
foot Mexico Cafe restaurant south of the Temecula Parkway and Pechanga Parkway intersection.
Status: Permit issued September 13, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division.
Rancho Soleo (Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road)
Description: Grading plan to allow for the final map and construction of a 245-unit multi -family development.
Status: Permit issued October 16, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division. Project is being phased at this time. It is anticipated the development will reach 25% occupancy
in Spring of 2021.
10
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
June 23, 2020
LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued)
Sommers Bend (formerly Roripaugh Ranch)
Description: Land Development oversight of the following submittals in plan check: Final Map reviews, Community
Sports Park Improvement Plan, Sommers Bend — Rough Grading Plan; Street Improvement Plan; Storm
Drain Improvement Plan; Street Light Plan; Signing & Striping Plan.
Status: Grading Permit issued September 27, 2018. The Loop Road (Sommers Bend) is completely paved with
streetlights installed. The Community Sports Park has kicked off construction in June 2020. Models in two
tracts are under construction. The Sommers Bend recreation center is also under construction. Ongoing
review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Anticipated completion of models in
mid -summer of 2020.
Staybridge Suites
Description: Grading plan to allow for an approximately 90,832 square foot, 4-story, 125-room Staybridge Suites hotel
located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue.
Status: Permit issued March 11, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division.
Temecula Village
Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of a 160-unit apartment community located on the south side of
Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Drive.
Status: Permit issued June 27, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division.
11
ELECTRONIC COMMENTS
SUBMITTED FOR THE
RECORD
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 8:43 AM
To:
Subject: RE: We support Law Enforcement/ Public Safety in Temecula
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the June 23d meeting.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Mike Naggar <mnaggar@citycouncil.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 12:51 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: We support Law Enforcement/ Public Safety in Temecula
„f Verified City Account
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Christine O'Neil" <bconeil105
Re: We support Law Enforcement/ Public Safety in Temecula
Date: June 11, 2020 at 12:47:55 PM PDT
To: Mike Naggar <mnaggar(cDcitycouncil org>
Thank you....that is what we had in mind.
God be with You and the other Members of the Council.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:32 PM Mike Naggar <mna ar cit council.or > wrote:
Thanks Christine. If you want this read into the record at our next council meeting you will have send to
the city clerk. You can just let her know by replying.
Luv Ya,
Mike
> On Jun 10, 2020, at 6:23 PM, Christine O'Neil < wrote:
> We support all budgets/ spending for Law Enforcement & Public Safety in Temecula.
> We greatly appreciate the excellent service we have received from the members of Law
Enforcement/ First Responder's team.
> Sincerely,
> Brian and Christine O'Neill
> 30 years Temecula Homeowners
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 15, 2020 8:26 AM
To:
Diana Gorham
Subject:
RE: Police Force
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randdi.johl temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Diana Gorham <
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 4:18 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Police Force
Regarding the message with the first line "Isn't it time Temecula had its own Police Force". The msg. should be signed
Ed Gorham (20 yr. Temecula resident.)
From: Diana Gorham <
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 4:14 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Police Force
Isn't it time Temecula had its own Police Force?
Perhaps it could be about half the size it is now and make sure not to hire anyone who has ever used excessive force.
Also, it would be good to hire people who live in Temecula, or the Pechanga Res.
Randi Johl
From: Diana Gorham <
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 9:51 AM
To: RandiJohl
Subject: Re: Police Force
You may read the E mail at the council meeting, however please say it is from Ed Gorham
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:25 AM Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> wrote:
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Diana Gorham <
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 4:18 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.iohl@temecuiaca.g_o_v>
Subject: Police Force
Regarding the message with the first line "Isn't it time Temecula had its own Police Force". The msg. should be signed
Ed Gorham (20 yr. Temecula resident.)
From: Diana Gorham <
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 4:14 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.mohl temeculaca. ❑v>
Subject: Police Force
Isn't it time Temecula had its own Police Force?
Perhaps it could be about half the size it is now and make sure not to hire anyone who has ever used excessive force.
Also, it would be good to hire people who live in Temecula, or the Pechanga Res.
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 8:06 AM
To:
Suzanne Lane
Subject:
RE: Comment for council meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randijohi temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Suzanne Lane <
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 6:15 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Comment for council meeting
Please address and correct the county numbers of COVID patients as we have been including those being flown in at
night, feom imperial valkey, who should not be MOVED if covid positive, as if they are our numbers. That's why our
numbers are rising!! Dirty political game
htt s://www.facebook.com/scott. arkinsonll osts/10219560391895191
Thankyou
Suzanne Lane
Sent from my Whone
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 8:06 AM
To: Suzanne Lane
Subject: RE: Urgent! Regarding public comment
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.iohl@temeoulaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Suzanne Lane <
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 9:23 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Urgent! Regarding public comment
Hi. Thank you for taking a minute to read these. 2 articles about Northern California mayor who lashes out at the latest
face covering rule stating there's no law that there is NIO LAW that orders you to wear a mask!
Thanks
Suzanne Lane �]
https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavirusZar-ticle243686692.html
htt s: www.latimes.com california stor 2020-06-21 ma or-of-nevada-cit -in-northern-california-lashes-out-at-face-
coverines-rule
Sent from my iPhone
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 8:08 AM
To:
Suzanne Lane
Subject:
RE: Public comment submission
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Please note that we have received several emails from you. We will read the emails together up to the 3-minute time
limit that is allowed for non -agenda public comments.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.io�a3temecuIaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Suzanne Lane <
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2020 4:32 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public comment submission
I would like to comment on the June 18th "Guidance" for use of masks posted in the California State Health Department
website. This has been touted and repeated in many newspapers and online news sources as "Governor Newsom issued
an order that all Californians must wear masks". We do not live in a kingdom and he is not the king that can make a
proclamation and tell us what to do. He is 1 of 3 co -equals. He is administration. Even via executive order, he can not
legislate. He directs agencies, such as the health department to issue orders. So, Newsom can not compel any individual
to do anything! Next, the state Public Health "Guidance" from June 18, 2020 is essentially a press release. It is not an
order or mandate or law. If it were, it would reference the law being followed. Also, it would State what happens if not
followed and the penal code # on it. If you look at what they posted, it has none of these and in fact says it is
"Guidance". Yes it says we "must" wear face coverings but, "must" is not a legally enforceable word. The word "Shall" is
enforceable. This is guidance and In fact is less restrictive than the one posted in April!! (Perhaps in a nefarious way,
that is why so much media is portraying it as though we all have to wear them now. Perhaps because they know it's less
restrictive "Guidance" and want to keep people in fear!?). also the "Guidance" has a whole list of persons who are
exempt from wearing a covering", including "persons with a medical condition for whom wearing a face covering could
instruct breathing! I say this would apply to every human as our bodies require a certain level of oxygen to function
correctly. Only a licensed medical professional is qualified to determine if someone is healthy enough to wear a mask as
it negatively affects the respiratory, immune and neurological systems. Also, HIPPA protects us from having to disclose
our medical condition. So, we are all free to NOT wear face coverings according to law. Plus our sherriff will not enforce
it. Social shaming is unacceptable. To shame me for nolt wearing a mask to protect you is unreasonable. When will it
end? Will you forever wear a mask because there will ALWAYS be flu and diseases floating around. We need to breath
and interact and build our immunity. Also, there is no science to show that masks protect you at all! All 7 studies noted
1
on the CDC website are inconclusive. If someone wants to wear one fine, but it is NOT an order and not enforceable.
And please see California Civil Code Section 51.7 a and b for actual law that protects us from discrimination in places of
business.
And please reference the latest FDA announcement regarding hydroxychloroquine. The media also twisted this. It
actually means that it's not just restricted for hospital use now. The most severe cases that they were seeing may not
benefit as much, so it's open for everyone now. Any doctor can prescribe as he wishes It's been around for decades,
FDA approved plus, the New England journal of medicine was wrong about it being dangerous. (See attached
redaction). This medicine works for COVID and even as a preventative. Please let the people know the truth. Thank you
very much!
='�r 'IV NEW ENGLAND
JOC1RHr1Ln(MI?DICINI+. _
CORR ES PONDCNCE
Retraction: Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and
Mortality in Covid-19. N Engl J Med. DOI:
10.1056/NCJMoa2007621.
lure d, 2020
D0I:'10.1056f NEIMc20'2122S
Metrics
2 Citing Articles
Related Articles
TO THE EDITOR;
lkcausr:ill the authors were not gi-mted access lu the n3W dnt:1 and Ilse rrrw data could not be made
AvailnbICIO a third-p:ulyaudiuwr, WC;u'c unahIC to valid:lte the hrim:u'y data sow'CUS underlying our
article, '(':IrdiOV%iscular DiSCON0, Drug Tlk-11py, and Mortality in Covid-14."1 % e therefore rcy11cS1 Ihat
tliC:Irticle be retracted. 4Ve :ywlogizc to the edilorS and to residers of IheJnurnal liirthe dilllCUIOC'S Ihat
this has Caused.
hlancleep R. Mclim, NLD.
Brigham And Wonwil's I lospital Hear) and Vascular Center, Ruston, MA
mutchra(ilbwh.h:uvartl.ctiu
Snpan S. Deaai, M.D., I''h.D,
Surgisphere, Chicngo, IL
SreyRant Ku)', M.D., lvL11.S.
Ba.VIOI- CONCgVofViCdicine, Houstun,'1'S
Timothy D. Henry, M.D.
Chris) Hospital, Cincinnati, 011
Suzanne Lane
Sent from my Whone
3
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 1:00 PM
To:
garrison 10
Subject:
RE: Masks
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: garrisonl0 <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:57 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Masks
We need to be united on enforcing the Governor and the cdc guidlines on wearing masks. The health of our
city depends on your leadership. This is not the time to cave to non science argument's. This is not about
being liked or worrying about you being reelected. TVUSD school board has one board member who agrees
students should wear masks. She is marrried to a pediatrician. This is about saving lives not a popularity
12:48 (,P N 'Rwit 13% 3
THIS ISN'T ABOUT
YOUR PERSONAL a
FREEDOM.
IT IS NOT AKIN TO
CHOOSING WHETHER
OR NOT TO WEAR A
SEATBELT--IT'S
CHOOSING WHETHER
OR NOT TO DRIVE
BLINDLY INTO A
CROWD.'
Jeffrey S. Hood
24 MINUTES AGO
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:18 PM
To: Emily Carian
Subject: RE: Public comment for 6/23/20 Temecula City Council Meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl r�?r_.temeculaca;goy
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Emily Carian <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 5:58 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public comment for 6/23/20 Temecula City Council Meeting
Hello. Please read this comment at the 6/23/20 City Council meeting.
"My name is Emily Carian and I am a Temecula resident.
I write to call on our City Council members to propose and implement a robust plan for protecting Temecula residents
from police violence. They must reallocate funds from policing to social services that improve the quality of life, mental
and physical health, housing and food security, and economic outcomes of Temecula residents.
The purview of police has expanded immensely over the last several decades. We now ask police to respond to
situations they are not trained for, including mental health crises, homelessness, and discipline problems in school. The
simultaneous militarization of our police means that officers respond to situations they are not trained for, with military
grade weapons. We must narrow the focus of police work to situations officers are actually trained for, and reinvest
some of the $38.5 million dollars Temecula spends contracting with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department into
addressing these fundamental social problems.
As one example, Temecula should develop and fund a dedicated team of mental health care professionals who will
provide immediate care to residents in crisis. In 2016, Matthew Tucker, an 18-year-old Temecula resident, called 911
when he experienced suicidal thoughts. Riverside County Sheriffs responded to the scene and shot and killed him.
Imagine if Matthew had been able to call a licensed mental health professional who could have deescalated the
situation and connected him with long-term services. Because of the current budget priorities of our city, Matthew's
best option was to call 911, and he was murdered.
Some will object to defunding the police, saying decreasing police presence will make Temecula less safe. But one
cannot argue that police presence made Matthew or his family safer. Decades of research show that people of color
(particularly Black people) are subject to over -policing, police harassment, and police violence. In other words, police
presence makes people of color less safe. All four of the City Council members promised action at the meeting on June
9. The strongest, most impactful action they could take is to reduce our city's police budget and reinvest that money in
Temecula residents."
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:23 PM
To: Julie Geary
Subject: RE: Mask use in public spaces
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.joh I@temeculaca. gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Julie Geary <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:56 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Mask use in public spaces
Hello my name is Julie Geary and I have been a resident of Temecula Valley since 1997. 1 am concerned that many
businesses are not enforcing the mask order, putting their employees and customers at risk. Some business are not
enforcing social distancing as well. The Riverside County sheriff originally said that they would not enforce the mask
order even though there is copious amounts of scientific evidence to the efficacy of mask use. We have recently seen a
dramatic spike in cases before the new mask order went into effect. I hope that the city takes this new order seriously
and works with the health department to enforce this new rule.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7191274/
https.ljpubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.OcO3252?ref=pdf
-Julie Geary
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM
To: Tammy Meyer
Subject: RE: Open Comments for 6/23 City Council Meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
ran&0ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Tammy Meyer <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:53 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Open Comments for 6/23 City Council Meeting
To The Temecula City Council,
I am extremely concerned about the lack of mask wearing that I see in our city. Granted the mask mandate only came
from the State of California last week, this should have always been a requirement to reduce the exposure to this virus.
Our local government (including the sheriff's department) must be a leader in this effort. When our city council
representatives scoff at the idea of wearing a face mask and our sheriff states that he will not enforce mask wearing, you
are telling us that you do not care about the public health. Shame on you for that.
Our infection rates are going up as a result of businesses going back to business as usual, and two Temecula businesses
have closed down due to staff members being infected. You must understand that these businesses have put our
community at a risk and that is unacceptable.
Mayor Edwards, please rise to the occasion. I know you love this community. Make the hard decision and mandate all
businesses to require masks of their patrons and employees. Do the right thing before it's too late for the residents of
Temecula.
Thankyou
Tammy from 92592
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM
To:
Subject: RE: June 23rd Board Meeting Comment/Question
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message -----
From:
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:55 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: June 23rd Board Meeting Comment/Question
Hello,
In light of the Governor's new mask orders that came down last week, I have concerns about local businesses who aren't
enforcing the mandate. We all know that masks significantly contribute to reduced rates of infection and I consider it the
easiest way I can contribute to the safety of my fellow residents.
With that said, a majority of the COVID cases in Temecula stem from 92592 so it begs the question why businesses,
gyms especially, who service residents in that zip code, aren't enforcing mask -wearing by their customers.
If a business is open, they should be following the rules. Most gyms in town are not "outdoors," a caveat provided in the
Governor's order. Exercise is important to us all during these times and I'm a fierce lover of my gym, but it's deeply
concerning to see Fitness 19 on Temecula Parkway dismiss public health recommendations and create their own rules
(that aren't being enforced). No doubt that this will backfire eventually.
Especially considering how far droplets can extend with forced exhalation as seen with exercise, the standard 6 ft rule
may not be sufficient to protect others sans a mask. Yes, working out with a mask isn't the easiest, but if we are all to
enjoy the gym, it's important we all play by the same sets of rules. If we are truly "in this together," we need to protect
one another and do our part.
Thank you,
Concerned Gym Goer
Sent from my iPhone
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM
To: Christy Ramos
Subject: RE: Comment for meeting tomorrow
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message -----
From: Christy Ramos <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:25 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Comment for meeting tomorrow
Hi Randi,
Hope you're having a good Monday.
I'd like to include this comment.
"Please enforce the order from the Governor about wearing masks. Several businesses are not adhering to the order and
allowing customers to roam the aisles without social distancing and without masks. I understand this is a divisive issue
but we need to stop the spread of COVID in our community. The only way to do that is to follow the Governors orders.
Also, who do I contact to make complaints to report those not following orders?
Thank you."
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:49 AM
To: Sydney Warner
Subject: RE: City council meeting 6-23-20
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message -----
From: Sydney Warner <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 11:35 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: City council meeting 6-23-20
Council members,
It's deeply concerning to me the blatant disregard the city of Temecula has shown in the wearing face
masks/coverings. With the riverside county sheriffs department openly saying it would not enforce the CA mandate and
our own council members snarking at the idea of wearing a face covering, I fear that COVID-19 will continue to spread in
our county like wildfire. I ask that the council and local government please rise to the occasion and begin enforcing this
new mandate before more businesses close and more people become infected. Please, I implore the City of Temecula
and it's Local government to promote masks and prevent more deaths.
Thank you for listening,
Syd 92596
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:38 AM
To:
Darla Gordon
Subject:
RE: City Council Meeting Comment
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi. iohl@te_meculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Darla Gordon <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:36 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: City Council Meeting Comment
To Whom it May Concern,
As a 14 year resident of this valley, I am emailing my concern with the city and this county regarding the spread of
COVID-19. My concern is that Temecula and Riverside County will not enforce the mandatory face covering order from
Governor Newsom. The increase in numbers in our valley is on the rise and if we do not require the face coverings and
take precautions we will continue to see those number increase. Our County Sheriff Bianco has made public statements
saying he will not enforce the order. This is problematic. His job is to protect and serve, yet he is refusing to protect the
very constituents that elected him. As a voting, tax paying citizen I am asking that you enforce and urge all citizens to
follow health and safety orders to keep us all as safe as possible during this time.
Thank You,
Darla Gordon
Thanks,
Darla Gordon
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM
To: Tiffiny Gage
Subject: RE: Unity in the Community
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.iohI0.temeculaca. gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Tiffiny Gage <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:38 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Unity in the Community
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt
stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great
suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Tiffiny Gage of French
Valley/Winchester, am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week.
Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to
some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city
council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
Sincerely,
Tiffiny Gage
Resident
Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee. The
information may also be confidential and/or legally privileged. This transmission is sent for the sole purpose of delivery to the
intended recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, any use, reproduction, or dissemination of this transmission is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message
and its attachments, if any.
E-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC SS 2510-2521 and is legally privileged.
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:36 AM
To: 'Julie Geary'
Subject: RE: Unity in the Community
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johI@temeculaca. gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Julie Geary<
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:33 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Unity in the Community
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many
heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement,
and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I Julie Geary of
Temecula, CA am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last
week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for
reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am
saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and
growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring
unity to Temecula.
Sincerely,
Julie Geary
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:33 AM
To: ZOYA BRYANT
Subject: RE: Temecula Unity
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message -----
From: ZOYA BRYANT <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:00 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula Unity
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I _Zoya Bryant_ of _Tenecula, CA)_ am
disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak
Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers
and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not
participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
Sincerely,
Zoya Bryant
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:34 AM
To: Samantha Ingels
Subject: RE: City council meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi jahl@temeculaca,aoy
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Samantha Ingels <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:52 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: City council meeting
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Samantha Ingels of MURRIETA, CA am
disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak
Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers
and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not
participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
Sincerely,
SAMANTHA INGELS
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:33 AM
To:
RE And Living
Subject:
RE:
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temecuiaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: RE And Living <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:10 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Vanessa Brooks, of Temecula, am disappointed to
see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his
regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to
listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this
beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
Sincerely,
Vanessa Brooks
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:33 AM
To:
Julia Kandus
Subject:
RE: Bringing Unity to Temecula
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
ra nd i .johl@temecu I aca . g ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Julia Kandus <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:00 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Bringing Unity to Temecula
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Julia Kandus, of Temecula, CA am disappointed to
see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his
regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to
listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this
beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
Sincerely,
Julia Kandus
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:35 PM
To: Tim McDonald
Subject: RE: Temecula Unity - To City Counsel
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
rand i.'ohl temeculaca. oov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Tim McDonald <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:27 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula Unity - To City Counsel
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Tim McDonald, a resident here since 1989, am
disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak
Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers
and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not
participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
Sincerely,
Tim McDonald
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:00 PM
To: Ashley Clingingsmith
Subject: RE: Temecula Unity
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
ra ndi.iohI(c_Dtemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Ashley Clingingsmith <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:57 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula Unity
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Ashley Clingingsmith of Temecula CA am
disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak
Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers
and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not
participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
Sincerely,
Ashley Clingingsmith
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:18 PM
To: Ursula Antinelli
Subject: RE: Lack of Attendance at last weeks community meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Ursula Antinelli <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:17 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Lack of Attendance at last weeks community meeting
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last wee k Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were
many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law
enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive
direction. I Ursula Antinelli of _Temecula Ca am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city
council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that
he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking
time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did
not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to
bring unity to Temecula.
Sincerely,
Ursula Antinelli
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM
To:
Christen Alarcon
Subject:
RE: Temecula
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message -----
From: Christen Alarcon <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:34 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I , Christen Alarcon, of Temecula, am disappointed to
see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his
regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to
listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this
beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
I would like to know exactly where Temecula officials stand on racism in our community. Do you support the white
business owners of Old Town Temecula, whom I witnessed with guns on their laps while people peacefully advocated for
equality? How do I explain that scene to my beautiful bi-racial children? You have been astonishingly quiet, which makes
me question your leadership.
Luckily, the youth of Temecula are We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting
down together to bring unity to Temecula.
Sincerely,
Christen Alarcon
Sent from my iPhone
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:33 AM
To:
Jay Alarcon
Subject:
RE: City Council Meeting 6/23/2020
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temecuiaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jay Alarcon <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:00 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: City Council Meeting 6/23/2020
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted "Unity in the Community" at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt
stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great
suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. As a participant, I was disappointed to
see that there was no one from city council present at the event. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that
he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to
their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did even attempt to participate in this
beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community, Please remember, it is no longer acceptable to
not have a stance. With elections coming up, our voted council persons must represent the interest of their community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
Sincerely,
Jay Alarcon, PhD(c), MBA, MA
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:53 AM
To: Julie Schwaben
Subject: RE: Temecula Unity event
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
ra nd i.joh1.(a)te m egu I aca . gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Julie Schwaben <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:47 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johI@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Temecula Unity event
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I Julie Schwaben of Temecula am disappointed to see
that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his
regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to
listen to their concerns later in the week. Zak is always showing up and is an incredible man. I am sure he must have
been ill. 1 am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing,
and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
Sincerely,
Julie Schwaben
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:33 PM
To: Brandon Whitney
Subject: RE: Diversity in Temecula and Progress against Racism
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi. ohl terneculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Brandon Whitney <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:32 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Diversity in Temecula and Progress against Racism
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many
heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement,
and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction.
I, Brandon Whitney of Temecula, California, am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council
representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to
attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their
concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this beautiful
night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
I would like to know your plans to deal with the issues of diversity and racism in Temecula.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring
unity to Temecula.
Sincerely,
Brandon Whitney
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM
To: 'Reecha Upadhyaya'
Subject: RE: For the council meeting today
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.0ahlCa7temeculaca.aov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Reecha Upadhyaya <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:44 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: For the council meeting today
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction.
I, Reecha Hindes of Temecula, am deeply disappointed to see that there was such a blatant lack of city council
representation at the event last week. What kind of message does that send to the community? Does temecula not
want to be known as an inclusive community? Do you not want folks from diverse backgrounds help propel our
economy and growth?
Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to
some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city
council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula. After all, you are elected to be the voice for all of us and not just a subset of our population. Please stand up
for your good conscience and help make Temecula the paradise who wish it to be.
Sincerely,
Reecha
Thank you!
'+Reecho Upadhyaya"
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:34 AM
To: Melissa Bahou
Subject: RE: City Council Meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
rand i. iohl(d)temeculaca.goy
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Melissa Bahou <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:59 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: City Council Meeting
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last Wednesday evening, Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. The night was full
of stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and a discussion of
how we can come together to push forward diversity awareness and acceptance within our town.
I , Melissa Bahou of Temecula was underwhelmed by the representation of City Council at this event. Council person Zak
Schwank was the only member willing to attend and did send his regrets when he fell ill. I commend him for viewing the
live stream and meeting with members of the community on his own time. I am saddened that other city council
members made zero effort to be apart of a wonderful night of listening, sharing, and growing.
I've lived in the area since 1994, 1 will be raising my children here as my husband is a local business owner, I cannot
stand by and let this slide while also trying to set an example of love and acceptance for my daughter. We as a
community need to be future ready, and that future includes equality for all and a love for every neighbor. I know
Temecula wants to be apart of something great, wants to be a city where everyone feels supported and welcome, and
that starts with you, City Council Members.
My hope is for your participation and attendance at future events held by Temecula Unity, open dialogues for how we
can work together and a future for Temecula where everyone is safe and loved.
Sincerely,
Melissa Bahou
P.S. Wear a mask. Loving thy neighbor also includes wearing a mask during a very real pandemic that Riverside County is
failing to defeat. Please encourage everyone to wear a mask.
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:35 PM
To:
Yahoo
Subject:
RE: Council Meeting Concern
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message -----
From: Yahoo <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 202012:41 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Council Meeting Concern
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction.
I, Alma Gervacio of Riverside, am deeply disappointed to see that there was such a blatant lack of city council
representation at the event last week. What kind of message does that send to the community? Does Temecula not
want to be known as an inclusive community? Do you not want folks from diverse backgrounds help propel our
economy and growth? Although I don't live in the city, I do work here and care about what's happening here.
Council person Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to
some of the speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city
council members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community. As
city leaders, it is your job to listen to your community's concerns. Do not hide away from your own community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula. After all, you are elected to be the voice for all of us and not just a subset of our population. Please stand up
for your good conscience and help make Temecula the paradise you wish it to be.
Sincerely,
Alma
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:42 PM
To:
Karen Garner
Subject:
RE: Unity in the Community
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi johl(cDtemeculaca-c
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Karen Garner <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:41 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Unity in the Community
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
Last week Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club. There were many heartfelt stories
shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law enforcement, and some great suggestions
on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction. I, Karen Garner of Temecula, CA, am disappointed to
see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Council person Zak Schwank did send his
regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the speakers and for taking time to
listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council members did not participate in this
beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
We hope you will consider coming to future events. We are looking forward to sitting down together to bring unity to
Temecula.
We have an amazing opportunity to make systemic change in Temecula that can work to ensure all residents feel
included, safe and valued regardless of their race, ethnicity, religion or lack there of, gender identity or orientation or
any other difference that makes them unique. I would love to see our city become purposefully inclusive in vision,
action, and policy.
Sincerely,
Karen Garner
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:39 PM
To: albia miller
Subject: FW:
Attachments: Temcula Stew 2.rtf
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: albia miller <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 12:21 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; randijohl@temeculaca.gov
Subject:
dear Ms. Johl
Glad to hear you are well.
Offices of Miller, Catlin, Rivera
Save Councilman Stew Stewart
June 23, 2020
Who has stood for Temecula
by recommending partiipation in Local actvities
and supported farmer's markets and started#Hometown Heroes?
Who has stood for Protecting Small businesses
So we can retain needed services if major systems
have experienced a shut down?
Who has stood for Temecula
by voting against projects that would Endanger Native
Wildlife Corridors?
Locally elected official, Stew Steward who hasn't solicited more work as Project Managers
for Developers paving over the Earth.
Stew Stewart works for your everyday needs
such as keeping the schools open, the roads safe, the water from geyser leaks,
the parks manicured, the Boys and Girls Club funded.
Stop Endangering Temecula by voting for people who vote for more Buildings!!!
Temecula is not a small town. If you add the 100,000 cars and Trucks that pass the City Hall everyday
to the 150,000 that live here that is 250,000 people in this town and another 25,000 for
Entertainment, We are talking almost as large as Corona with
Hotels, Pechanga, Resorts, visiting, Events, Enterprenuerings, Hiking, etc. Temecula is a mini Las Vegas
and getting worse.
Who would know more about the massive negative effects of more housing than the Local Council
People like Stew Stewart unless they live Multi Regionally lives developing more and more congestion
with destructive constructing and not even experiencing day to day in Temecula like Mike Naggar,
project manager for more destruction or Mr. Haun more at UCSD than Temecula. That is part of
reason for these new Hotels is to stay closer to their development. No sense of Community there.
Temecula Stew as he is named is a serious contributor to keeping Temecula at its current over built
Metropolitan former Rural area with a few Historical areas left instead of past elected officials who have
actually solicitied developers. Can you even image more Hotels and Apartments which is on the
Master Plan? Mr. Stewart supports remodeling any Historical venues like Vail Ranch and bringing it to
the attention of schools and civic groups.
However, he made a remark that has cost him his councilship. He needs to be forgiven and back in his
seat. As emotions are running high and some Police choices are most Uncalled for and even Fatal and
weapons do not forgive, we are all going to make communicaton indiscresions.
Murrieta's Mayor Alan Long had a DUI and ran into four Night Hawk Cheerleaders in his truck and
seriously injured one and he was reelected.
Mr. Stewart said What? That he could not recall a good person of color being shot by Temecula Police.
The Tyisha Miller shooting was Riverside Police and in deed was long term Honorably fought for Justice
by many Temeula Citizens which means they had to go to court in Riverside. They even sat on the
Freeway and stopped traffic to show solidarity with the decision that those Police needed to go to jail.
Mr. Stewart is talking about Temecula police.
Temecula would have a 3 billlion dollar economy from tax revenue from Hotels, tract housng and I
say what for? This is the rural country: Temecula had nothing like that 35 years ago and nothing
like an overcrowded, car wreck prone, crime ridden large town and it still had amazing and diverse
activities from grape growing on much smaller scale, to avocado and citrus farms. It was quite, lovely,
clean, great air quality, classical music, ballet, Native species, Western Art, the Great Oak Tree,
churches, and Indian Museums and ceremonies. It had Everything accept traffic, bad air, poor water
quanity and quality, extensive crme, and now, overrun with rodents.
Mr. Stewart keeps us informed on his Face Book Page about the Statistics of COVID, keeps us up on
Road Closures, Special People's Needs during COVID, works with Cal Fire to prevent Wildfires in
Temecula, supports Candlelight walking tours of Temecula, and researches people for his
#HometownHeroes and a Pro Small Business page on his Face Book and, there is no reason to lose this
valuable Community Servant.
He also confers with the Police as to their presence in a respectful position to Peaceful Protesting and
that is why the Peace was kept during highly emotiional Protesting in Temecula. Under his leadership,
we were able to express our outrage that another Human Being was terminated in the cruelest of ways
when it was not only unnecessary but apart of someone else's political agenda. Life is to be lived out
not extinguished at the hands of another mortal. The Final Judgement of Our Good Deeds and Works
is in the Hands of Almighty Jehovah. May The Holy Spirit have Mercy on Our Souls.
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:35 PM
To: Ana M
Subject: RE: Mask Mandate
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl(a)tememlaca. qov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Ana M <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:29 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Mask Mandate
Good Evening,
I am a 10 year resident in South Temecula and I have serious concerns regarding the leniency of face mask
mandate.
All though we have a low # of positive cases here in Temecula, we have lots of visitors and tourist that visit our
town. Most positive cases are from the 92592 zip code.
We currently have several popular businesses that have shut down due to an infected employee, this is a RED
flag and we must do something about it, sooner than later or we will have to close everything down again and
I certainly would not like to see that in our beautiful city.
Masks must be Mandatory, we are continuing to re -act to COVID-19. We are not ahead of this disease.
We all know that masks significantly contribute to reduce rates of infection, this is the easiest way we as a
community can contribute to the safety of our fellow residents and visitors.
I wear a_Mask in public for the following reasons:
1. 1 do not know if I have COVID-19, it is clear that people can spread the disease and not have symptoms.
2. 1 don't know if the person that is near me has a kid battling cancer or any underlaying medical
conditions. An elderly mom/dad they care for.
3. 1 want our community to thrive again, business to stay open and employees to stay healthy.
We all need to do our part.
I know TEMECULA has Heart!
A very concerned citizen
Ana Moreno
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:13 PM
To:
Mike Mamian
Subject:
RE: 2 issues for tonights meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
ra ndi. johl(uotemeculacagov_
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Mike Mamian <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:06 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: 2 issues for tonights meeting
I wanted to reach out about two issues regarding our city. I have lived in Temecula for 16 years and voted in every local
election.
1) 1 am wondering why our police department operated by the Riverside County Sherriff is not enforcing the mandated
mask -wearing policy issued by the governor. I see all around town in stores people without masks. My wife is a high risk
for COVID-19 and it is a disgrace that our sheriff will not even ticket or do any sort of enforcement of this policy. If my
wife or any of my family gets sick, will they be willing to pay for the hospital bills?
2) 1 can not believe that after the previous mayor's comments about black people that not one councilmember went
to Last week's Temecula Unity in the community meeting at the Old Town Blues Club. We need the leaders of
our community to engage in these conversations to make our community stronger.
Thank you for your time.
Mike Mamian
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:14 PM
To: Troy Chavez
Subject: RE: Public Comment (6/23)
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johI(QtemecuIaca. qov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Troy Chavez <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:02 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Comment (6/23)
Hello Randi,
I hope you are doing well. See below for my public comment.
"Hello, My name is Troy Chavez and I was raised in this town for as long as I could remember. I moved out for college,
lived in Whittier (near LA) for six years and then moved back here. What I have seen transpire in the last few weeks
made me realize that as a city, the council should stand up against the county sheriff's department and the well -funded
police union that supports almost every member of the Riverside County Board of supervisors -- including Sheriff Chad
Biacno, himself.
We contract their services and have an option to raise concern about their methods/practices. We should not be afraid
to demand reform. This county and city need more action than symbolic gestures.
We should set up a committee to tackle this issue and fill it with a mix of community leaders and one or two council
members. The committee should take a long hard look at what it needs from the county sheriffs and what the future of
policing will look like for the city and the county.
We can be a megaphone for change, no matter how small our city is. I am willing to be a part of the committee and help
coordinate, if the council finds it prudent to create. Let's show the people of temecula that we care about everyone in
the community, not just the ones shielded from police brutality. Thank you."
Have a great day!
I
Warm regards,
Troy Chavez
(
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:13 PM
To: Amber Mamian
Subject: RE: Concerned Community Member
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi,johl@temeculaca.goy
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Amber Mamian <
June 23, 2020 1:09 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Concerned Community Member
Dear Members of the Temecula City Council,
My name is Amber Mamian and I am a president of Temecula (have been for the past 16 years). I have three major
concerns right now.
1) The lack of enforcement in regards to regulations for wearing masks. I am disappointed by the lack of
consideration for our elderly and those who are high risk let alone ALL of our safety when it comes to this pandemic.
I have a cousin who is head of a USC hospital in LA and another who is the Head of Contact Tracing for California
and I will hold the city responsible financially should I be infected be of the carelessness around the reinforcement of
the regulations set in place by Governor Newsom. I have contacted Riverside Sherrif as well and have heard zero
response.
2) As the parent of two black children, I am saddened by the attendance of last week's Temecula Unity event. In
case you were not aware Temecula Unity hosted Unity in the Community at the Old Town Blues Club last week.
There were many heartfelt stories shared by people of color in our community, questions answered by local law
enforcement, and some great suggestions on how to move policing policy in Temecula in a positive direction.
I am disappointed to see that there was a lack of city council representation at the event last week. Councilperson
Zak Schwank did send his regrets that he was unable to attend and I commend him for reaching out to some of the
speakers and for taking time to listen to their concerns later in the week. I am saddened that other city council
members did not participate in this beautiful night of listening, sharing, and growing better as a community.
3) The Trump EZ Up is selling merchandise on Winchester (near Margarita) and is not displaying a current sales
permit. Why is this allowed? Are we going to allow vendors to sell random items up and down our city streets?
I hope you take into consideration the importance of unity at this time. I urge you to consider the scope of the
pandemic and the precautions that protect Temecula citizens, enforcement of our laws in regards to sales permits,
and where we can conduct business, and I hope that council considers coming to future events put on by Temecula
Unity.
Sincerely,
Amber Mamian
Founder, Global Munchkins I CEO, Rookie Moms
O, The Oprah Magazine Ambassador
Two time Iris Award® Nominee
www.GlobalMunchkins.com I www.RookieMoms.com
U13213
Latest on Global Munchkins I Latest on Rookie Moms
*REACHING OVER 6 MILLION MOMS EACH YEAR".
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:00 PM
To: Jon C
Subject: RE: City Council Comments
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jon C <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:54 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johI@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: City Council Comments
Dear Mayor Pro Temp Edwards, and honorable council members,
A few days ago, Governor Newsom issued an order requiring everyone to wear face masks when in public to slow the
spread or COVID-19. We have not seen a decrease in reported number of cases, in fact the number of new cases has
been steadily increasing. Sheriff Chad Bianco has made it clear through his previous statements he will not enforce
these orders. How will you safeguard our community from the rising numbers of COVID-19?
This is another reason why I, and so many others want our own police department. The current head of our law
enforcement agency does not hold the same values as those in our community. Additionally, we will be able to enact
lifesaving practices and policies to the way we enforce our laws.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Chang
92592
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:52 PM
To: Adam
Subject: RE: Comments for City Council Meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Adam <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:50 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Comments for City Council Meeting
Honorable City Council Members,
I am writing to because I am concerned about our city during the ongoing pandemic. I continue to see stories of places
closing down because of a COVID 19 infection. The virus is obviously spreading in both our county and city. I see
hospitalizations and ICU admissions on the rise as well. As a result of this, California has placed Riverside County on a
watch list and issued a statewide face mask mandate. Several recent studies have shown the number one way we can
currently slow the spread of the virus, and prevent future waves, is if everyone were to wear a face mask. I have seen
comments suggesting the Sheriff's Department is failing to enforce the face mask mandate, and even not wearing masks
themselves. I want to ask the city council to consider how to help enforce the mandate and help protect our community
from the Coronavirus.
I know some people are adamantly against the wearing of face masks, and am extremely disappointed this has become a
political issue when it should be one of safety. I expect you may here form them how bad masks are and how we need
to defy the mandate. I urge you not to listen to them and to listen to the experts that say masks can and will help stop
the Coronavirus. I want you to know there are community members that want to see the mandate followed and
enforced. Thank you for your time.
V/R
Adam Labotka
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:18 PM
To: Jennee Arango
Subject: RE: Public Comments
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jennee Arango <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:02 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Comments
Dear Mayor Pro Tem Edwards and Esteemed City Council Members
As you know Riverside County COVID-19 numbers continue to rise steadily and have done so since the county
rescinded the requirement to wear masks in public. A few days ago Governor Newsom reinstated the order
requiring everyone to wear face masks when in public to slow the spread of COVID-19. Riverside County
Sheriff Bianco publicly asserted that he will not enforce any orders requiring citizens to wear face masks. In
light of this, how will you, those entrusted with keeping the citizens of Temecula safe, do so? How will you
ensure that our town is not overrun with those who choose to ignore science, those who flout the governor's
order, and those who selfishly show little regard for the safety of others?
It is high time that Temecula considers enshrining its own police force, so that its citizens are not subject to the
whims of, although duly elected to serve and protect the people of Riverside County, a sheriff who chooses not
to safeguard those very same communities.
Also, please update your website as the "Email All Council Members" still includes former Mayor Stewart's
email address.
I thank you for your time and efforts.
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:19 PM
To: Christopher Bout
Subject: RE: For Public Comment 6/23 - Thank you Randi
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johI@temeculaca. gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Christopher Bout <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:01 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: For Public Comment 6/23 - Thank you Randi
Hi Randi,
I'd like a brief public comment to be read publicly into the record tonight.
Good evening Mayor Pro-Tem, City Council, City Manager Adams, and staff. My name is Christopher Bout and I am a 20-
year Temecula resident, and unlike dozens of public comment contributors at our last council meeting, I can prove it.
In my professional life I work in the energy sector and serve municipal clients and participate in organizations for civic
leaders. As such, I follow several cities with whom I am working with and attend virtual council meetings throughout the
Inland Empire regularly. I can tell you with absolute certainty, because of the tone, wording style, syntax and structure
that the flood of emotion -based, misinformed police -hating public comments given at our last meeting was a structured,
concerted effort by a small focus group intent on proliferating a false ideological narrative designed to disrupt and
ultimately destroy our current social constructs. That same group, with the same message, with the same letters, also
flooded Hemet, Ontario, Riverside, Anaheim, Escondido, Menifee, and others. Please let your rational, mature, level-
headed conscious prevail and to give these leftist hate mobs ZERO credibility or space in your collective psyches. They
are the loudest because they are the fringe, so they must scream to be heard. They remaining 99% of the population,
who just want to work hard for their families, love America and for all She stands for, who respect law -enforcement and
do not condemn an entire industry by the actions of a few.... THOSE people were not screaming for some twisted
reform. THOSE people are the majority, and THOSE good, law-abiding people are the interests that you should have in
mind, NOT the interests of the outraged hate mobs who threatened to wreak havoc over Stew's speech -to -text mistake
and who are currently seeking to destroy American cities, our country, our history, so they can transform America into
some decrepit socialist utopia where everyday is the Summer of Love.
I ask that you take Aaron Adams' invocation to heart, and pray for divine guidance as you select Stew's replacement.
Thank you.
Randi- please confirm receipt. Thank you!
Chris
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:48 PM
To:
Tami Simms
Subject:
RE: Letter to be read into the record for general meeting 06/23/2020
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with allachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Tami Simms <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:08 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Letter to be read into the record for general meeting 06/23/2020
Thank you Randi for all your hard work, we ALL appreciate you!!!
Dear Mayor Pro Tem Edwards, and honorable council members,
I am a 32 year resident of Temecula and I have serious concerns regarding the leniency
of face mask mandate. A few days ago, Governor Newsom issued an order requiring
everyone to wear face masks when in public to slow the spread or COVID-19. I have not
seen an increase of local Temeculians conforming in fact several have made it clear that
they will not comply. Seeing a statement from our Riverside sheriffs department even
undermining the rule of law from the Governor, stating while on duty they will not wear
masks is so infuriating. I'm sorry but when those expected to protect and serve do not
comply to wear a mask, we need to change and get our own police force, how is that even
possible??? We have not seen a decrease in reported number of cases, in fact the
number of new cases has been steadily increasing. Sheriff Chad Bianco has made it clear
through his previous statements he will not enforce these orders. How will you safeguard our
community from the rising numbers of COVID-19?
I know some people are adamantly against the wearing of face masks, and am extremely
disappointed this has become a political issue when it should be one of Science and
1
Safety. We currently have several popular businesses that have shut down due to an
infected employee, this is a RED flag and we must do something about it, sooner than
later or we will have to close everything down again and I certainly would not like to see
that in our beautiful city. We all know that masks significantly contribute to reducing rates
of infection, this is the easiest way we as a community can contribute to the safety of our
fellow residents and visitors.
Masks must be Mandatory, we are continuing to re -act to COVID-19. We are not ahead of
this disease.
As Council members you are here to serve our community, I urge you to make masks
mandatory for the safety of our community, this is what you were elected to do.
Thank You,
Tami Sims
Temecula Resident
4
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 2:10 PM
To: Spencer Szczygiel
Subject: RE: Council Meeting Public Comment
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi johl uG7terrseculaca.goy
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Spencer Szczygiel <
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 10:24 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: RE: Council Meeting Public Comment
Randi, please see below:
As an operator of multiple restaurants in Old Town I urge Temecula to close down Front St. to vehicle traffic as
planned. In the short term it will allow businesses to offer a safer environment by spreading out our dining rooms even
further and expanding upon outdoor seating which is recognized as a safer environment. I understand that there are
considerable logistical challenges with residential and vendor deliveries that would require thought and consideration,
but the safety of our community should be our foremost priority.
In many cities over the world pedestrian neighborhoods have been tremendous for local businesses within the district
and for generating tourism dollars and revenue for the city. If this could serve as a potential trial for a permanent
change, it would be worthwhile to explore the opportunity. I understand there are vocal businesses locally who would
not take advantage of the allowance but I firmly believe if more foot traffic comes to Old Town as a whole, every
business would stand to benefit regardless of whether they expand their seating.
Spencer Szczygiel
Director of Restaurant Operations
S enter tvwiner mans ement.com
www.tvwiner mans ement.com
TEMECULA VALLEY
WINERY MANAGEMENT
From: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 6:14 PM
To: Spencer Szczygiel <
Subject: RE: Council Meeting Public Comment
You're welcome to email me the comment to be read into the record pursuant to the notice on the front page of the
attached agenda. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
rand i.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Spencer Szczygiel<
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 2:48 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.iohl temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Council Meeting Public Comment
Hello,
1 would like to make a public comment regarding the potential Old Town street closure for the meeting scheduled
Tuesday June 23rd. I understand the meeting is virtual and I'll need to provide my comment in advance. Can you please
guide me on the process?
Thank you in advance for all your help.
Spencer Szczygiel
Director of Restaurant Operations
Spencer@tvwinerymanagement.com
www.tvwinecymanagement.com
TEMECULA VALLEY
WINERY MANAGEMENT
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 8:06 AM
To:
Robert Danko
Subject:
RE: Old Town Front Street Closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message -----
From: Robert Danko <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 7:38 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Old Town Front Street Closure
At the last City Council Meeting, the plan to temporarily close Front Street and allow restaurants to expand seating
capacity by utilizing the sidewalk and part of the public street was presented, discussed and ultimately approved. The
Plan as shown in the diagram presented at the Council meeting was well thought out and seemed to be fair to
restaurants, residents and non -restaurant businesses. Based on the approved Plan, our business has applied for the
necessary ABC permit and obtain the required insurance. We have also expended thousands of dollars to purchase the
patio furniture and containment barriers per our submitted plan. What has changed? A few members of the public late
to the party, or misconception regarding the temporary nature? This past week I have been asked about the closure by
numerous individuals, and while there were some initial negative comments, once I explained the plan was only
temporary and designed to assist the struggling restaurants, I found the support overwhelmingly positive. Again, what
has changed in the last few days?
As a family owned restaurant I can attest to the fact that limiting the occupancy of our business changes the financial
model we have worked with for over five years. A restaurant runs on very thin margins compared to other types of
businesses. Limiting our revenue opportunity by 50% while our fixed costs remain at 100% makes a profitable business
become one that is doomed to fail. We were forced to close our doors for a significant part of 2020, and upon re-
opening have experienced an increase in costs, lower sales and no relief from rent, utilities, or equipment loans.
I was thankful the City listened to the business owners and came up with a fair and reasonable solution. The most
important fact to survival of our business and most of the other restaurants is building up our sales back to normal as
quickly as possible. With the social distancing requirements in place we need the extra space that was approved by the
City. The public is willing to once again enjoy the Old Town district and wants to safely socialize. Since the March shut
down there have been several abuses in Old Town such over -crowding, use of parking lots and alleys, and serving people
in the streets. While this has not been widespread, it is an indication that reversing the City's approval of the Plan may
lead to more abuse and disobedience of the CDC guidelines.
I urge the members of the Council to continue with the approved plan as long as the occupancy of our local businesses
are restricted.
Sincerely,
Robert Danko
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 11:06 AM
To:
Whitney Friedrich
Subject:
RE: Road Closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director 1 City Clerk
randi.iohlC&temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Whitney Friedrich <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 11:05 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Road Closure
I am Whitney Friedrich, I own Arrow Beauty Collective, I am against closing the street. It will negatively
affect my business.
Thank you
Whitney Friedrich
(
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 12:48 PM
To:
Mad Osin
Subject:
RE:
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
ra n d i . jo hl@te m ecu laca. g ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt
From: Vlad Osin <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:43 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:
Hi, Please do not close a Old TownFront street.
Thank you.
Best Regards
Vladimir Osinovskiy
SilverFever
1
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:50 PM
To: Taos Territorial Traders
Subject: RE: Old Town front street . Closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.0ohICaMemecuIaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Taos Territorial Traders <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:49 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Old Town front street . Closure
To whom it may concern. My name is David Lewis I am the owner of 28551 and 28561 Old Town front street Taos
territorial traders I am against all closures of Old Town front street it will directly impact all retail businesses . Including
my own businesses. Please boat against closing Old Town front street I am not for it as a business owner Put the money
that you would use for street closure signs into better use for promoting Old Town is open for business as usual thank
you David Lewis Taos. I am against street closures.
Get Outlook for Android
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 1:01 PM
To:
Subject:
RE: My business will be impacted severely
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl temeculaca.cL
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Creative Director <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:14 PM
To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.Qov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank
<Zak.Schwank temeculaca. ov>; Mike Naggar <mnaggar@citycouncil.org>; Maryann Edwards
<Ma ann.Edwards cit councilor >
Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant temeculaca. ov>
Subject: My business will be impacted severely
Hello Randi
Concerns: My business will be Very impacted by road closures
As a 7-year tenant in the Pen fold building (which is a building the back of front street), the Salon will greatly be
impacted with the closure that was voted on June 9, with NO communication to ME or many of us in this building and
many other businesses. To be quite honest, I am upset and very disappointed in the City Council to make such a huge
decision on my behalf without any notice of such meetings on May 29, because we were closed due to the Covid and the
City Council to have this on Agenda with no notice for our concerns and voices to be heard. This has to be the lowest
form of sneakiness and betrayal by our city council. Will these business impacted be compensated?
As a Salon owner — 20 percent of our cliental average over 65 of age (covid risk) and another 25 percent are local
Temecula residents just wanting their hair done then back home because they dislike all the traffic and people always
drinking.
Of course never any parking which is always a constant struggle. This is a struggle for our elderly and a safety issue if
they cannot park close up. Yes I would be impacted greatly without our clients.
Another safety concern the temperatures is extremely high and in asphalt is a major concern for the elderly cliental this
would not benefit to their health, safety and my business.
I know I have always had many challenges with the parking, because it is always congested and not enough parking
structures or parking on this side of front street. Many parking spots were taken away to build riverbed in the
back. Sometimes our clients get so frustrated they reschedule and leave disappointment. We have been impacted by
weddings not taking place as we specialize in Bridal hair and makeup for over 300 brides a yr. and blowouts for over
3000 clients so yes we are hurting tremendously too!
Because of state board and CDC we have to comply in the New norms which no more than 10 ppl in the salon including
stylist so a small salon is now running at maybe 35 percent capacity at the moment.
So, I would like to know how closing down Front Street helps my business and many others who have other business
than just eating and drinking!
Most of us have been shut down 3 months with no revenue as oppose restaurants were open for take-outs. Some did
better thru the Pandemic than when opened by 50 percent and receive the PPP to help them get through these difficult
times. So now, the city continues to hurts smaller businesses that were a phase 3 without resources, parking, and no
voice.
I understand the need to help restaurants in our area and I would rather you spend the efforts in lifting the ban of
reopening and focusing on more parking spaces. Mayor Stew had mentioned parking structures on this end of Front
Street. Where the beer wine / farmers market now again another change unbeknown to us!
I did watch the meeting on U-Tube as (Luke Watson) city Management straight left out any other business are going to
be affected.
And you mentioned that you tossed this ides it around in 3 weeks and Yes without hearing everyone's concerns. I have
to say this was a very poorly thought up plan to accommodate only the restaurants owners and trying to execute this
would be a disaster on all other business not in the restaurant business. This would close down many business and I
hope those are not your intentions. We will be impacted severely if road closure continues.
Sincerely,
Brenda Schultz
Thomas Edward Salon and Dry bar
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:26 PM
To:
Subject: FW: Front street closure would impact me
Attachments: Hello Randi revise.docx
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.jahlOD-temecu laca-gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Creative Director <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:35 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Front street closure would impact me
I have attempted different emails and keeps be sent back to me.
I hope this goes thru and I would appreciate this being read city council tomorrow evening.
Also please a response if you receive this one.
Thankyou
Brenda Schultz
Sent from Yahoo Mail for Whone
Hello Randi
Concerns: My business will be Very impacted by road closures
As a 7-year tenant in the Pen fold building (which is a building the back of front street), the Salon will
greatly be impacted with the closure that was voted on June 9, with NO communication to ME or many
of us in this building and many other businesses. To be quite honest, I am upset and very disappointed in
the City Council to make such a huge decision on my behalf without any notice of such meetings on May
29, because we were closed due to the Covid and the City Council to have this on Agenda with no notice
for our concerns and voices to be heard. This has to be the lowest form of sneakiness and betrayal by
our city council. Will these business impacted be compensated?
As a Salon owner — 20 percent of our cliental average over 65 of age (covid risk) and another 25 percent
are local Temecula residents just wanting their hair done then back home because they dislike all the
traffic and people always drinking.
Of course never any parking which is always a constant struggle. This is a struggle for our elderly and a
safety issue if they cannot park close up. Yes I would be impacted greatly without our clients.
Another safety concern the temperatures is extremely high and in asphalt is a major concern for the
elderly cliental this would not benefit to their health, safety and my business.
I know I have always had many challenges with the parking, because it is always congested and not
enough parking structures or parking on this side of front street. Many parking spots were taken away
to build riverbed in the back. Sometimes our clients get so frustrated they reschedule and leave
disappointment. We have been impacted by weddings not taking place as we specialize in Bridal hair
and makeup for over 300 brides a yr. and blowouts for over 3000 clients so yes we are hurting
tremendously too!
Because of state board and CDC we have to comply in the New norms which no more than 10 ppl in the
salon including stylist so a small salon is now running at maybe 35 percent capacity at the moment.
So, I would like to know how closing down Front Street helps my business and many others who have
other business than just eating and drinking!
Most of us have been shut down 3 months with no revenue as oppose restaurants were open for take-
outs. Some did better thru the Pandemic than when opened by 50 percent and receive the PPP to help
them get through these difficult times. So now, the city continues to hurts smaller businesses that were
a phase 3 without resources, parking, and no voice.
I understand the need to help restaurants in our area and I would rather you spend the efforts in lifting
the ban of reopening and focusing on more parking spaces. Mayor Stew had mentioned parking
structures on this end of Front Street. Where the beer wine / farmers market now again another change
unbeknown to us!
I did watch the meeting on U-Tube as (Luke Watson) city Management straight left out any other
business are going to be affected.
And you mentioned that you tossed this ides it around in 3 weeks and Yes without hearing everyone's
concerns. I have to say this was a very poorly thought up plan to accommodate only the restaurants
owners and trying to execute this would be a disaster on all other business not in the restaurant
business. This would close down many business and I hope those are not your intentions. We will be
impacted severely if road closure continues.
Sincerely,
Brenda Schultz
Thomas Edward Salon and Dry bar
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:58 PM
To:
Subject: RE: Old Town Front Street Closing for resturants
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.iohlCa7temeculaca.,gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Paul Babb <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:51 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johI@temeculaca.gov>
Cc: Council.assistant@temecula.gov
Subject: Old Town Front Street Closing for resturants
Cheryl's Antiques
This would have a negative impact on my Business.
Parking, foot traffic, flow of traffic, clean streets. People drinking, cost of insurance, lack of security.
Loss of biker traffic.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:59 PM
To: Liliya Osinovskaya
Subject: RE: Request To reverse decision of close Old Town Front Street closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl a temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Liliya Osinovskaya <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:37 PM
To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: FW: Request To reverse decision of close Old Town Front Street closure
Dear members of Temecula City Council
We ask you to help all brick and mortar businesses in Old Town district, revisit the above -specified decision
and correct it.
Road closure affects walking and driving traffic, and any limitation of visitors will affect negatively the already
struggling community of local businesses.
I work our Temecula location regularly and I can tell you for certain that your decision to close will have a
negative effect on all stores and businesses, which, obviously, will negatively affect the taxes that we bring to
the City on regular basis.
Any type of construction work or road limits is a negative effect, we all felt that last year when the sidewalk
was changing. The road closure will have only a deeper negative impact. We always count on the support of
the city.
Please note that I am just one voice above many, all the stores and many restaurants voiced numerous
concerns.
Thank You,
LGCG(Jia 0--i ov--k6llJia,
Senior Buyer
Silver Fever LLC
www.silverfever.com
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:58 PM
To: Letty Marquez
Subject: RE: CLOSURE OF OLD TOWN STREET
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi iohl(a)-necuiaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Letty Marquez <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:44 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: CLOSURE OF OLD TOWN STREET
Good afternoon Mr. Randi,
I'm writing to express opposition to the closing of streets in Temecula Old Town. I believe that the job of our council members
is to protect all business and not just few. Having a business in Temecula is expensive, rents along can take a lot from a
business to be able to run, if they apply for the PPP grant, funds run out for most of them already, the city/county only offer
one grant so I invite you to please put yourself in the shoes of many of these small business who many have older clients and
unable to walk. Why hurt these small businesses any more than they've already been impacted? It seems completely
unnecessary if this is an effort to control the spread of Covid-19. The CDC has already issued information that the virus
doesn't spread from surface contact. If the issue is crowds not maintaining social distancing, or wearing masks, then why not
police that? Set up a volunteer/senior police 'ambassadors' to do it. I pray you and everyone at the city decision making team
realized that this is not the best strategy to help small businesses strive and survived Covid19 after been close for so long.
Have a blessed day,
Lefty A. Marquez, EA
CLSA-NP/Tax Advisor
MVP Notary and Tax Services
43180 Business Park Dr. Ste 103
Temecula, CA 92590
http://Mvpnotai3Landtax.com
FAX 866-723-5859
"Lord grant me the strength to change the things I can, the ability to accept the things I can't, and the wisdom to know
the difference between the two. "- Serenity Prayer -
This e-mail and any attachment is intended for the above named and/or intended recipient(s) only, and may contain confidential information. If you are not an
intended recipient, please notify the sender of the miscommunication and delete the message. Failure to maintain the confidentiality of this e-mail and any
attachment may subject you to penalties under applicable law.
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 1:58 PM
To:
Ed Dool
Subject:
RE: TEMECULA STAGE STOP ( OLD TOWN FRONT STREET CLOSURE)
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.iohlCr temecuiac__ a,gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Ed Dool <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:49 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Rinku patel <rinkurox310@yahoo.com>
Subject: TEMECULA STAGE STOP ( OLD TOWN FRONT STREET CLOSURE )
This is Ed Dool, representing five business and owns of The Temecula Stage Stop 28464 Old Town Front St. we would like
Old Town Front St.to be OPEN and would like to thank the City for there time and effort for giving Old Town 90 more
parking spaces and fixing the alleys.
Edward Dool
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:59 PM
To: Carol Rocha
Subject: RE: Old Town Street Closures
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.iohl ri temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Carol Rocha <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 1:11 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Old Town Street Closures
Importance: High
I'm writing to express opposition to the closing of streets in Temecula Old Town. Why hurt these small businesses any
more than they've already been impacted? It seems completely unnecessary if this is an effort to control the spread of
Covid-19. The CDC has already issued information that the virus doesn't spread from surface contact.
If the issue is crowds not maintaining social distancing, or wearing masks, then why not police that? Set up a
volunteer/senior police 'ambassadors' committee to do it.
These are difficult times for all of us. Please don't cut off our nose to spite our face.
Carol A. Rocha
Haute Inspirations
www.hauteinspirations.com
(
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:20 PM
To:
Subject: RE: Old Town Temecula Road Closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 4:48 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Old Town Temecula Road Closure
Hello my name is Leslie Kavanagh and I am the owner of The Katwalk Boutique in old town Temecula. I have been at my
location for 10 years. I adamantly oppose any closure of Front Street to compensate for the few restaurants versus all of
the small businesses in the area. Such closure would be a huge detriment and financial loss for most businesses. Parking
is already very limited. Closures such as the Rod Run, the holiday parade, etc. have caused a huge loss in income as well
but I have never complained about these closures as they draw a lot of a attention & exposure to Temecula and are for a
very limited period. The only compromise I can see is to close the designated blocks after small businesses close at
6:00 until midnight and only on Friday and Saturday. Most businesses don't get a huge lunch or dinner crowd during the
week. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Leslie Kavanagh
Sent frorn AOL Mobile Mail
Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.00m
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 6:20 PM
To:
Rene ehmcke
Subject:
RE: revised letter from The Gambling Cowboy & Rene's Cowgirl Cantina
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randijohl(a)tein@�culaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Rene ehmcke <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 4:22 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: revised letter from The Gambling Cowboy & Rene's Cowgirl Cantina
Hi, I am Rene Ehmcke , speaking along with Bill and Nltza Ehmcke , owners of both The Gambling Cowboy
Chophouse and Rene's Cowgirl Cantina located on the corners of fifth and front in Old Town Temecula. First,
we would like to thank Luke Watson for all his efforts and helping us to clear up the concerns we have around
fifth street with parking, deliveries etc. and the proposed cjosure of Front Street. The original proposal of
closing down the street seemed like a great idea and a way to allow the businesses to expand to help increase
revenue with the capacity challenges we've been facing as small businesses trying to survive. However, now
that many of the restrictions have been lifted , with just a drive through Old Town it's apparent that all the
businesses seem to be getting back to speed, we think the closing of Front Street isn't as necessary as once
thought. Parking is still a major issue and getting our guests as close to their destinations should be our
concern. Perhaps a compromise of every Thursday from 5- 10pm with a Farmer's Market, Street Faire kind of
atmosphere with Downtown businesses sharing their wares would satisfy both sides of the issue. For The
Gambling Cowboy, and Rene's Cowgirl Cantina it just doesn't seem necessary at this time for "indefinite"
street closures, especially with the recent closings of 2 Downtown Restaurants due to Covid 19.
Thank you for your consideration.
From: Rene ehmcke
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:25 PM
To: Randi.Johl@temeculaca.g_v <Randi.Johl temeculaca. ov>
Subject: Old Town Front Street Closure
Hi, I am Rene Ehmcke , speaking along with Bill and Nltza Ehmcke , owners of both The Gambling Cowboy
Chophouse and Rene's Cowgirl Cantina located on the corners of fifth and front in Old Town Temecula. First,
we would like to thank Luke Watson for all his efforts and helping us to clear up the concerns we have around
fifth street with parking, deliveries etc. and the proposed closure of Front Street. The original proposal of
closing down the street seemed like a great idea and a way to allow the businesses to expand to help increase
revenue with the capacity challenges we've been facing as small businesses trying to survive. However, now
that many of the restrictions have been lifted , with just a drive through Old Town it's apparent that all the
businesses seem to be getting back to speed, we think the closing of Front Street isn't as necessary as once
thought. Parking is still a major issue and getting our guests as close to their destinations should be our
concern. Perhaps a compromise of every Thursday from 5- 10pm with a Farmer's Market, Street Faire kind of
atmosphere with Downtown businesses sharing their wares would satisfy both sides of the issue. For The
Gambling Cowboy, and Rene's Cowgirl Cantina it just doesn't seem necessary at this time.
:�°'. Virus -free. www.avast.com
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:26 PM
To: Jackie Acosta
Subject: RE: Old Town street closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl(o)temeculaca.aov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Jackie Acosta <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:02 PM
To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Old Town street closure
I am a salon owner at Hair & Co., Inc. by the corner of Front and Main. I feel the closure would affect my
clients tremendously. It would increase the likelihood of not being able to find a parking space for my clients,
which will drive them to search for another business that doesn't have parking issues. Not having adequate
parking for my elderly clients is just inconsiderate. They need to park close to my location because some of
them can't walk that far. I feel the street closure is only catering to restaurants with no respect to the rest of us
small businesses, who are still trying to recover from the shutdown. Economically, it will impact my business a
lot, and not in a positive way.
Thank you,
Jackie Acosta
Owner
Hair & Co., Inc.
42031 Main St. Ste. E
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM
To: Neeru Sehgal
Subject: RE: closer of roads in old town temecula
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.iohl(iNemeculaces,gay
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Neeru Sehgal <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:28 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: closer of roads in old town temecula
Hi
Randi,
I heard you were the person to email regarding the road closer in old town front street. I am writing to that this is not a
good Idea since there are a lot of other business in old town and not just restaurants that are hurting and shutting down
the main street is going to be hurting those businesses also. As it is parking is tough in old town by shutting the roads lot
of people are going to stop coming - I go into old town to pick up things and food and Will try to avoid that area if I have
to walk 3 to 4 blocks to pickup the food or make deliveries. Even elderly people will stop going there as it is too far to
walk. Please reconsider this as it is not feasible to everyone.
Thanks
NEERU SEHGAL
SUNIL SETHI REAL ESTATE
Realtor, Notary, Property Manager
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:25 PM
To:
Subject: RE:
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi. iohI@temecuIaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 3:39 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:
To M. Randi Johl and the Temecula City Council:
I am Sylvia Paulsen, owner of The Gardener's Cottage on Front Street since 2012. I have seen the affect of street
closures on our daily sales numbers throughout the years. The impact is always negative. In spite of this, I have never
expressed opposition to activities that build community spirit and bring traffic to the town.
This is different. The proposal that a few restaurants can expand their access into the street causing blockage for
everyone else is unfair to the majority of the businesses on the street. We all rely on abundant parking and free flow of
traffic throughout Old Town for the survival of our stores.
In the past two years, between the recent laying of updated sidewalks, installation of new sewer lines, widening of the
flood control, and nearby large construction projects, all good but lengthy improvements, we have experienced
innumerable interruptions to traffic access and parking for our customers, to the significant hardship of our bottom
line. COVID-19 shutdowns and restrictions have of course added many further burdens to our family businesses. We
need solutions that benefit all of Old Town.
I am adamantly opposed to any activity that would block street access, for the benefit of a few and the
detriment of everyone else.
Sylvia Paulsen
The Gardener's Cottage, Inc.
28465 Old Town Front Street #101
Temecula, CA 92590
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:26 PM
To: michael
Subject: RE: street closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randijohl(&temeculaca.aov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: michael <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:46 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: street closure
This needs to be reconsidered my business Old Town Antique Faire is not going to benefit one bit form this,
my older customer base will not hike down from the parking garage to my business which they have already
informed me. Maybe consider closing a side street or do some kind of study on this matter. Try including the
other merchants not just a couple of restaurants my business has been here since 1987 and it has and still is a
draw for this town.
thanks Michael Freville
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 6:28 PM
To:
Randy
Subject:
RE: Front street closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
-----Original Message -----
From: Randy <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:03 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Front street closure
Hi this is Ken Rauton from the Swing Inn Cafe, I have been operating on this corner for 45 years and can unequivocally
tell you that closing front street is a bad idea. We as merchants have been through enough in the past 3 months and
most of us are just now getting back the business we lost due to Covid-19. The time for an experimental "new old town"
is not now, we have had 100% of our customers express they will do business elsewhere if the road closes. Just as we
have gotten them back, the decision of the council is threatening to take them away. The logistics alone warrant this
idea to be scrapped, a 40 foot tractor trailer in old town on 3rd street delivering food to us or another restaurant how
does he turn around and get out. These are the issues we would face daily. And if we would have been properly notified
of this idea the city council could have saved a tremendous amount of time and money if you would have taken the time
to listen to the merchants.
Ken Rauton
Sent from my iPhone
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 6:28 PM
To:
Subject:
RE: Old Town Street Closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Richard Leigh <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:03 PM
To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn TemeculaCA. ov>; Zak Schwank
<Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann_.Ed_w_ arils@citycouncil.or >; Mike Naggar
<m n aRga r@ cityco unci I, o rg>
Cc: Luke Watson <luke.watson@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Old Town Street Closure
Hello Council Members,
We wanted to share our continued support of the City's plan to close part of Front Street to allow for
expanded retail and restaurants on the sidewalks and parking spaces.
A vast majority of the negative feedback has been north of 4th Street. The City has addressed that feedback
by shortening the closure to south of 4th Street. The access to their parking lots and street parking will no
longer be impacted.
Claims that parking will be negatively affected is not accurate. The City has added more spaces than will be
removed by the closure.
Claims that the closure will decrease social distancing is also inaccurate. The closure creates more space for
walking and more space for businesses, which encourages social distancing.
Please note that the OTTA does not represent the whole of Old Town. In fact, they do not represent some of
the largest employers in Old Town. Also, keep in mind that some of their members are also in favor of the
closure.
Most importantly, the decision to allow businesses to expand directly affects our ability to generate sales and
in -turn keep valuable staff. The street expansion allows for a win -win situation. Restaurants and retail will
have the ability to social distance and have enough space for customers to get close to pre-covid sales. In
regards to 1909 specifically, the expansion gets us close to the seating we once had. It will be impossible to
keep our entire staff if we are stuck at 50% capacity.
Some of the feedback that we have heard is that business is "fine" since reopening. Many of these businesses
have not been affected because they are not following the State's guidelines. Please give the businesses, and
their employees, a chance to do the right thing AND stay in business.
Please keep in mind that there is support for the program, in the form of applicants. And many shared their
support during the last public hearing. I hope their voice is not lost this week.
I also believe that many will join us, on the street, when the existing applicants prove that it is a worthwhile
investment.
It is universally understood that this is a temporary expansion. Nobody, including myself, can say that this will
be perfect for Old Town or not. This is not a new idea. It has been proven in countless cities worldwide. But
let's give it a chance and see if it is great. There couldn't be a more appropriate time to try out this concept.
I urge the council to consider all the facts before making a decision to cancel the project. Many businesses
have invested much time and money into preparing for the expansion. I have seen many of the plans, of the
applicants, and can honestly say that they are well thought out and well designed. I believe it will be a great
draw to Old Town.
Thankyou
Ricky Leigh
1909 Restaurant
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Monday, June 22, 2020 6:30 PM
To:
Main Street Salon
Subject:
RE: Road closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi johl0NtemecuIaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Main Street Salon <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:14 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Road closure
My name is Michael Lisa Kavanagh, I own Main Street Salon on Main Street. I am against the road closure of front street.
I have already lost patrons do the article published about the street closures. My clients have stated that parking is
already difficult enough and will be finding a salon elsewhere so they don't have to deal with the new road closure. I
urge you to vote against the street closure to help old town businesses and not just a few restaurants, especially seeing
has how 1909 already had to close down again due to a positive covid test.
Thank you for your time
Michael Lisa Kavanagh
Main Street Salon
Sent from Yahoo Mail for Whone
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:50 AM
To: Mechel Marcucci
Subject: RE: Front Street Closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi. johI(cDtemecuIaca.9ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Mechel Marcucci <mechel.
Monday, June 22, 2020 7:17 PM
To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Front Street Closure
I am aware of the decision to close Old Town in some areas to help restaurants and
vendors rebuild business (June 24th)/ My concern is what happens to other businesses
that are not on that end of town?
As you know parking is at a premium. The employees on 5th St. all ready have difficulty
parking to get to work on time and to assist our clientele.
Will there be any parking assigned for 5th St. businesses?
We have restaurants,retail,antique store,hair salons,candy store, cheese shop ,cupcake
store and more. Myself included.
We all would have appreciated more time and information before the decision was made
for us.
We all hope we are considered in your final decision.
RepectfullX
Mechel Marcucci
Travel Consultant
Office:
All prices subject to change until booked and paid in full. Flight reservations placed on hold will cancel within 24 hours.
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:49 AM
To:
Thomas Kinkade -gallery
Subject:
RE: No Street Closures
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
ra ndi.johl(a)temeculaca. aov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Thomas Kinkade -gallery <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 10:30 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Fw: No Street Closures
For the City Council meeting regarding street closures, please see below from mad madeline's.
Thomas Kinkade at Old Town
28545 Old Town Front St.
Suite # 103
Temecula, CA 92590
(
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Sid Hamilton <
To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020, 08:51:18 PM PDT
Subject: Fwd: No Street Closures
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From:
Date: June 22, 2020 at 5:16:33 PM PDT
To: "<Council.assistant temecula. ov>" <Council. assistant(o)TemecuIa. gov>,
"<Randi.Johl(temecula.gov>" <Randi.Johl __Temecula.aov>
Cc:
Subject: No Street Closures
Hi,
I am writing this on behalf of Sidney Hamilton. Sid owns Mad Madeline's Grill. He is against closing the
street because it will negatively affect his business. Please let us know if there are any updates on this
issue. Thank you
Have a Great Day!
Christina Reynolds -Hamilton
Mad Madeline's Grill, Inc.
28495 Old Town Front Street 4A
Temecula, Calif. 92590
.goo %
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 7:49 AM
To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery
Subject: RE: For the City Council meeting - Front Street Closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi joh O)temeculaca.goy
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Thomas Kinkade -gallery <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 10:35 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: For the City Council meeting - Front Street Closure
TITO
look forward to my comments being read in their entirety for the record. City Council
has been ignoring my emails, and this is the only way to be heard.
Also, we were given an incorrect email address for you, so I wanted to confirm you
received emails from Taos Traders, Vintage Begonia, Katwalk, Arrow Beauty, Silver
Fever, Cheryl's Antiques, The Little Viking, Gardeners Cottage, and Thomas Edward
Salon.
I have forwarded you the email from Mad Madeline's.
From Jerry at Thomas Kinkade Gallery
City Council —
I
Here is the timeline of events...
6/13 Saturday - I emailed City Council and other elected officials regarding the street
closures, when it was publicized in myvalley news.
6/15 Monday - Businesses were then told on Monday June 16th the street closure has
been cancelled; which I emailed for confirmation and was told by Luke Watson was
incorrect, it was simply delayed until Wednesday June 24th
6/16 Tuesday - I emailed again regarding parking constraints, delivery issues; and the
previous closures due to sidewalks being replaced, protestors, and COVID closures
and quarantines.
6/17 Wednesday - An article came out in myvalleynews, publicizing the plan; meeting
with Luke Watson 20+ business owners at Mad Madeline's, where he told us City
Council had voted for the street closure and it was a done deal. I called and left
messages for Zak and MaryAnn, and additional emails. No response.
emailed specifically asking for the list of 60-70 restaurant owners at the private
meeting where they voted for closed the street, mentioned in the City Council meeting
on 6/9. No response or list of those owners. I brought up that at the 6/9 meeting , they
only read four comments that were read in support of closing the street; two were from
former chamber of commerce members, one was a business owner whose business is NOT in
Old Town, and the other was from a city resident. NONE were from actual Old Town business
owners. Received a response from Mike Naggar saying the council had done their
outreach, made their decision, and he said you email everyone on the council, it is
hard for them to respond
6/18 - response from Zak they are taking our concerns seriously, I responded this
matter was urgent and could not wait to be corrected, since they kept publicizing the
plan of the street closures on the pe, myvalleynews, and temeculapatch.
6/22 Monday small businesses received notice from the OTTA on Monday 6/22 that we
needed to submit our comments individually to the city council by 6/23 Tuesday for the
meeting, despite us already sending multiple emails as a group. The email address
they provided was incorrect. Multiple business owners received bounce back emails
that their email was undeliverable.
What about this plan does City Council feel was handled correctly? This initiative
supposedly came from a private meeting of 60-70 restaurant owners. We have asked
for the names of those owners in attendance and have yet to receive them. They
supposedly voted based on those 60-70 restaurant owners but they feel ignoring
emails from 20+ small business owners in Old Town was appropriate? Despite 10 days
of emails, we were given 24 hours to voice our concerns and an incorrect email
address to submit them to?
z
My concern stated in all original emails I sent....
The original plan was not publicized as it should have been. Business owners in Old
Town were not consulted.
This plan is a very narrow, short sighted view, when you consider how many
restaurants one visitor can patronize. Any visitor, at max, visits two restaurants. Most
diners come specifically for dinner, after the wineries close, and all the retail shops are
closed for the day.
No other city or shopping district has closed their streets indefinitely, with no end date.
There is no precedence or justification for this. By closing the street to allow people to
take over the street, it will become a swap meet environment with open containers.
That does not appeal to the Old Town customers that we currently service.
You cannot close Front Street for parking or through traffic. We just got over the city
closing the sidewalk to remove the wood plank side walk - which also reduced parking,
protestors marching down Front Street which forced us to close early due to curfew,
and that is in addition to being closed for COVID quarantine. The solution here is not to
further restrict access to Front Street, when all we have been dealing with is Front
Street restrictions. Closing the streets to parking will make pickup of purchases and
deliveries from UPS and Fedex impossible, and a lack parking will discourage people
and make them go elsewhere. The plan does not replace all lost spaces. The current
plan of closing three blocks is a loss of approximately 75 parking spaces. The
message from the city needs to be Old Town is OPEN, there is parking, come visit.
Thomas Kinkade at Old Town
28545 Old Town Front St.
Suite # 103
Temecula, CA 92590
(
3
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:38 AM
To:
Subject: RE: Street closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
-----Original Message -----
From: REBECCA WALTON <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 6:56 PM
To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Street closure
I am completely AGAINST closing OLD TOWN FRONT STREET
My customers are older - many 50 and up or with younger children plus I have many staff that cannot find parking now.
Deliveries are Already a nightmare. I see no benefit to street closure.
We are able to practice social distancing with NO problem. Seating guests 6 feet apart - - and wait listing them as
necessary. All staff wear masks and are temp checked.
Thank you.
Rebecca Walton
Texas Lils Mesquite Grill
32 years in business
Sent from my Phone
1
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:39 AM
To:
Subject:
RE: Small business owner in Old Town
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
rand iJohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Luke Watson <luke.watson@temeculaca.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 9:16 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Small business owner in Old Town
.� Verified City Account;
Comments for Old Town item tonight.
Luke Watson
Director of Community Development
City of Temecula
(951) 694-6415
I u ke. watso n Co)Te m ecu la CA.gov
From: Megan Maclntyre <
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 5:26:28 PM
To: Luisa Tovar <luisa.tovar temeculaca. ov>
Cc: Luke Watson <luke.watson temeculaca. ov>
Subject: Small business owner in Old Town
Hello Council Members,
It has been brought to my attention that there could potentially be a delay or cancellation in the Old Town Front Street
project, and I just wanted to share my opinion on the matter.
I am a fairly new business in Old Town (Under the Willow, where we just hit our 1 year mark In May), but have multiple
I
businesses in Carlsbad Village, CA. We are following every single practice set forth by CDC, as well as every retail best
practice we have researched during this unique time. It has been challenging to keep things afloat, but I'm doing
everything in my power to stay positive, and make sure we are adapting to anything and everything that has been
thrown at us.
We have removed fixtures, added sanitizing stations, and spread out everything in the store so that social distancing is
100% compliant. When I heard about the expansion, I immediately planned out next steps with my contractor to ensure
we have a beautiful addition to the front, that does not reflect a temporary addition due to high standards and visual
excellence. We have purchased the supplies, and scheduled the addition to take place this Friday and Saturday, so that
we can open the expansion to the public on Sunday. We have been sharing this info with all of our customers, and
everyone is thrilled to see the new curated space.
My employee schedule for next week allows me to add 3-4 shifts each day (5-6 on weekends) for the additional space,
which will make a huge difference in my staff's ability to receive their regular hours pre-covid.
I would ask you to reconsider this delay/cancellation, and allow us to give this a try while social distancing is still so
important in our everyday business. It would be a huge blessing to those of us who have closely followed the rules, and
kept maximum capacity a huge priority during this time.
Thank you for your consideration, and please feel free to reach out if you have any further questions!
Megan Maclntyre
President/CEO
Under the Willow
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:38 AM
To:
Subject: FW: Old Town Restaurant/Retail Expansion
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
ra ndi. iohlCa7temeculaca. gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
s•
r�
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Chris O'Neill" <
Subject: Old Town RestauranVRetail Expansion
Date: June 23, 2020 at 8:55:33 AM PDT
To: matt.rahnCtc7citycouncil.org mna. Iar@citycouncil.org, zak.schwankCa3.temeculaca.gov,
m a rya n n. edwa rds()-citycou n ci I. oM
Please excuse me if I have missed some council members email addresses...
To the Temecula City Council,
In advance of tonight's upcoming meeting, I would like to get my opinion on the record regarding my
support for the street closure and Old Town restaurant and retail expansion.
While Old Town itself is already a viable tourist destination, it is much less desirable to tourists and
locals alike when dining establishments are either closed or limited in capacity. I have seen firsthand the
dip in business when one or two popular restaurants are closed in Old Town. While it is difficult to gauge
exact numbers and causation factors during a pandemic, I can attest to at least a 10% reduction in
business when popular restaurants are not open or operating with limitations.
The two weeks before Father's Day have historically been two of our busiest weeks at Temecula House
of Jerky. This year our numbers were actually on a par with last year until 1909 and Luke's had to close
down due to Covid-19 protecals. Based on the previous week and last year's numbers, that cost us a
20% reduction in business as people were not travelling to Old Town to eat. This also meant less foot
traffic as diners typically visit the many local retail establishments while waiting for a table or deciding
where to eat. While many retail owners may not see dining establishments as an important factor in
their businesses, I truly believe many of these businesses would be in dire straits if it wasn't for the
traffic these restaurants generate in Old Town.
It is with this understanding that I support any ideas or initiatives to help our local restaurants at this
time. Allowing them to increase their outdoor dining capacity is not only good for business as a whole in
Old Town, it is also many times safer for our population during this pandemic.
I have spoken with many business owners in Little Italy San Diego about their recent "al fresco" dining
weekend and they got nothing but positive reviews from their customers. It was seen as something new
and exciting to their customers while also allowing these businesses to increase sales in their effort to
stay afloat during this difficult time.
Old Town Temecula House of Jerky would welcome the street closure, as it would decrease the multiple
speeding cars and motorcycles that use Old Town Front Street as a bypass for traffic on the 15 freeway.
This increased vehicular traffic does not help my business, it most likely hurts it. The increased number
of parking spaces will be a huge positive, as will the increased area for customers to walk, shop, and dine
in areas where Old Town Front Street is closed.
In terms of size, my store is probably the smallest in all of Old Town Temecula. While we have been in
our location since 1995, our sales have suffered due to the need to socially distance. While normally we
could pack our store with customers and welcome the additional business, we now can only allow one
family or group into the store at a time to ensure social distancing. While some customers will wait
outside until the group in front of them finishes their purchase and leaves, many will simply walk away.
This is a huge detriment on the busy weekends, which allowing the expansion of retail onto the street
will drastically help. With this plan, we can now sell outside and inside in a Covid compliant manner that
keeps our customers and employees safe while not adversely affecting sales.
I see nothing but positives for this plan and support it. I know many other business owners who think it
is a good idea that could increase business. I am positive it will, as it has in many other cities across the
country.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Chris O'Neill
Old Town Temecula House of Jerky
TemeculaHouseOfJerk .com
28655 Old Town Front Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:37 AM
To: Olivedipity
Subject: RE: Old Town Closures
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi .'ohl@temeculaca..clov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Olivedipity <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:18 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Old Town Closures
Hi Randi,
We don't agree with shutting down the streets to add restaurant tables. We feel it is hard enough for visitors to
find parking and it will look like we are under construction. Not to mention the delivery trucks that already block
off streets and have a hard time getting through. I was told by Luke that we would have to have the trucks
deliver in AM and it would not be a problem —but, that is a problem. Delivery trucks give you a window. For
instance, I do request AM deliveries but, my window is 9-11 yesterday my truck showed up at 1:00pm. I realize
my building is not in direct effect of this but, it is going to work against other business.
Perhaps if the streets were blocked off around 5/6pm then it would assist the restaurants and not effect other
retailers as much.
We also don't feel it's good enough to close down this much when only a few restaurants are participating. It
will be an open space for people to gather and hang out instead of social distancing, shopping and eating.
Regardless of the time of blocking the streets off - you would be taking away handicap parking and making it
extremely hard for customers to be dropped off at a location and for customers to pick up large or heavy
purchases.
When, after retail hours it makes it more of a win win..
Thank you for your time,
Mike and Nicole Kelleher
Get Outlook for iOS
Get Outlook for iOS
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM
To: Gillian Larson
Subject: FW: Public comment request for 6/23/2020
Attachments: Public Comment street closure in Old Town for pedestrians only.docx
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.iohl atemecu}aca. cl ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Gillian Larson <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 202010:42 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public comment request for 6/23/2020
Hi Randi
I have attached my public comment for this evening regarding pedestrian dining in Old Town.
Hope it fits the 3 minutes. The links are just a reference to so much found in Google on this issue all over the country,
links not to be read in the comment.
Thanks
Hope you are doing OK and you and your family are well
Stay safe and well
Gillian
Reality Rally Thank
My T.E.D talk.
My S.U.E Talk
Creator and Event Producer, President Reality Rally Inc
www.realit rall .com Please sign up for our News Updates
Reality Rally Thank you
Follow us on facebook.com/realityrally
Twitter @realityrally
IG @realityrally
CBS Survivor Reality Star
Gillian
Sizzle Reel
https://www.youtube.comlwatch?v=Hr6Yr)FMwu-c
For several years as Old Town has got busier and noisier, many have thought closing an area of Front
street to traffic and making it pedestrian only would be a great idea.
Temecula now has an opportunity and reason to do so and what a perfect trial period to benefit many
and to see how valuable it could be in the future.
Cities across the country are closing down town streets for Al Fresco dining. There are endless articles
when googled. At the end of my comments there are 13 links, a few I had time to find not to be read but
to show this is happening all over the country
Benefits.
• Increase patronage to restaurants with Covid spread safer dining opportunities.
• It could be a draw for tourism if Temecula leads the way with pedestrian Old Town Al Fresco
dining
■ Traffic safety and noise is a big drawback and would improve so people in general and with
children and strollers more likely to frequent outdoor dining establishments now and in the
future.
• Long term this pedestrian area could be a beautified center point like many other cities have.
I am sure the City task force leading this plan has given consideration to all possible drawbacks to make
accommodations and will do so as others may arise
Adequate signage
Parking concerns
Need for shade
Access for residents
Alcohol licensing
Interestingly, the very popular Al Fresco dining in Europe was introduced due to the Spanish Flu of 1918
Thank you.
Gillian Larson
htt s: westchesterma azine.com coronavirus-covid-19-westchester eekskil1-croton- orktown-
outdoor-dinin
htt s: mv-voice.com news 2020 O6 22 no-cars-in-si ht-castro-street-closed-to-traffic-for-outdoor-
dinin
htt s: www.mv-voice.com news 202O O5 13 ever -seat-outside-would-hel -cities-consider-closin
streets-to-traffic-to-make-s ace-for-stru lin -
restaurants?utm cam ai n=ma net&utm source=article a e&utm medium=related articles
https://www.washingtoUost.coml
https://www.latimes.com/caIifornia/story/2020-05-19/iong-beach-m u IIs-opening-streets-for-dining-
and-recreation
https://www.Presshera Id.com/2020105/12/portia nd-floats-closing-downtown-streets-for-open-air-
dining-retail
htt s: www,usatoday.com/sto[y/money/2020/05/2 1coronavirus-reo enin -restaurants-outdoor-
dining-streets-sidewalks-pa rking-lots/5217156002/
https://www.scpr.org/propra ms/airta Ik/2020/05120165639/socaI-cities-look-to-street-closures-to-
expand-out/
https://www. statesm a n io u rna l.co m/st❑ ry/I ifelfoo d/2020/06/18/dow ntown-sa lem-resta u ra nts-
outdoor-d ining-reotaening-oreeon-businesses153311120021
https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2020/05/14/dining-city-exploring-options-for-closing-streets-for-din_ ing�
https:l/thecounter.org/covid-19-street-dining-tam pa-cincinnati-new-york/
https://www.biz'ourna Is.com/pittsburphZnews/2020/061221downtown-restaurants-outdoor-seating=
expansion.html
https://ny.eater.com/2020/5/6/21248077/restaurant-reopening-strategy-coronavirus-nyc-laws
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 11:35 AM
To:
Subject:
RE: Old Town Street Closure
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
raridiiohl temec-L laca..gav
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Andrew Doty <
Subject: Fwd: Old Town Street Closure
Date: June 22, 2020 at 5:29:19 PM PDT
To: zak.schwank temeculaca. ov, "james. stewart" <'ames.stewart cit councilor >,
Matt.Rahn cit councilor , maryann.edwards cr.citycouncil.org, mnaggar@citycouncil.org, Luke
Watson <Iuke,watson@TemeculaGA.gvv>
Cc: Richard Leigh < , Ricky Leigh < ,
Amanda Lane < , Bill Steinkirchner < ,
Kimberly Adams< Kelleher
<Jkelliher
all of you at Temecula City Hall.: This is for the hearing tomorrow evening JUNE 23rd.
It is my understanding that there is potentially a movement to "reverse" the decision to close off Old
Town streets as per the current, revised plan.
I am not sure what made the City re -think their decision, but I am adamantly opposed to the reversal
and fully believe with all my business instincts, that this will be great for Old Town and the business
community.
I am aware that there has been some "pushback" from some of the Old Town Businesses and even the
OTTA, (mostly between 5th & 6th street)...... yet, you addressed their concerns by revising the
plan. Which is now the right plan. There are many of us who support the effort and current plan.
TEMECULA is a tourist destination. It is who we are now. By doing this will only reinforce our
commitment to being one of the top draws in SoCal.
Just today in New York City, restaurants are allowed to open for the first time for "outdoor
seating". Guess what, they are doing the same thing that The City is offering Old Town. Expanding the
footprints of restaurants to allow for social distancing and more capacity. The owners there are so
excited and appreciative in NYC.
Closer to home...... Carlsbad, CA has been doing it for a couple of months now.....and to great success.
LA is still closed....... where do you think those folks are going to go for some relaxing and entertainment?
I have already seen a great influx at my business from people from LA and other areas.
LEADERS of TEMECULA ...... we will not get another opportunity to at least try this. No one knows for
certain if this will be "successful" or not, but there is zero chance of ever finding out if we don't do this
now. We have the 4th of July weekend around the corner, with no parade and no fireworks
show....... let's give the people something special to participate in.
IF YOU BUILD IT ....... they will come........ once the word is out ....... they will come from all over SoCal during
the cool of the evenings to enjoy Old Town Temecula. Most every restaurant, bar and retail business
will benefit immensely.
You've done a great job with the additional parking. Revising the plan from 4th to 2nd WAS and IS the
right move.
From 4th to Main Street, you have almost unanimous business owner support for doing this.
DO IT.
Trust your instincts. Trust those business owners that actually have the largest stakes in Old Town. The
ones that really "invest" in Old Town.
Thank you.
Regards,
Andrew Doty
''BLUES TOYAW'
WWW.OLDTOWNBLUESCLUB.COM
ANDREW DOTY
OLDTO WNB LU ESC LU B@GMAI L.COM
28636 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET
#102
TEMECULA, CA 92590
"LIVE MUSIC LIVES HERE"
Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Leigh <
Subject: Fwd: Old Town Street Closure
Date: June 22, 2020 at 4:27:19 PM PDT
To: Andrew Doty <
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
From: Richard Leigh
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 2:03:22 PM
To: james.stewart@temeculaca.eov <iames.stewart@temeculaca.gov>; matt.rahn@city_
council org<matt.rahn cit council.or >; zak.schwank@temeculaca.gov <zak.schwank@
temeculaca. oy>; maryann.edwards@,citycouncil.org <mar ann.edwards cit council.or
g>; mnaggar@citycouncil.or<mna ar cit council.or >
Cc: Luke Watson <luke.watson@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Old Town Street Closure
Hello Council Members,
We wanted to share our continued support of the City's plan to close part of
Front Street to allow for expanded retail and restaurants on the sidewalks and
parking spaces.
A vast majority of the negative feedback has been north of 4th Street. The City
has addressed that feedback by shortening the closure to south of 4th
Street. The access to their parking lots and street parking will no longer be
impacted.
Claims that parking will be negatively affected is not accurate. The City has
added more spaces than will be removed by the closure.
Claims that the closure will decrease social distancing is also inaccurate. The
closure creates more space for walking and more space for businesses, which
encourages social distancing.
Please note that the OTTA does not represent the whole of Old Town. In fact,
they do not represent some of the largest employers in Old Town. Also, keep in
mind that some of their members are also in favor of the closure.
Most importantly, the decision to allow businesses to expand directly affects our
ability to generate sales and in -turn keep valuable staff. The street expansion
allows for a win -win situation. Restaurants and retail will have the ability to
social distance and have enough space for customers to get close to pre-covid
sales. In regards to 1909 specifically, the expansion gets us close to the seating
we once had. It will be impossible to keep our entire staff if we are stuck at 50%
capacity.
Some of the feedback that we have heard is that business is "fine" since
reopening. Many of these businesses have not been affected because they are
not following the State's guidelines. Please give the businesses, and their
employees, a chance to do the right thing AND stay in business.
Please keep in mind that there is support for the program, in the form of
applicants. And many shared their support during the last public hearing. I hope
their voice is not lost this week.
I also believe that many will join us, on the street, when the existing applicants
prove that it is a worthwhile investment.
It is universally understood that this is a temporary expansion. Nobody,
including myself, can say that this will be perfect for Old Town or not. This is not
a new idea. It has been proven in countless cities worldwide. But let's give it a
chance and see if it is great. There couldn't be a more appropriate time to try
out this concept.
I urge the council to consider all the facts before making a decision to cancel the
project. Many businesses have invested much time and money into preparing
for the expansion. I have seen many of the plans, of the applicants, and can
honestly say that they are well thought out and well designed. I believe it will be
a great draw to Old Town.
Thankyou
Ricky Leigh
1909 Restaurant
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:00 PM
To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery
Subject: RE: Road closure Tuesday city meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johI cDtemecuIaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Thomas Kinkade -gallery <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:57 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Fw: Road closure Tuesday city meeting
Thomas Kinkade at Old Town
28545 Old Town Front St.
Suite # 103
Temecula, CA 92590
(
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Shawn Smoot <
To: '
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 01:11:47 PM PDT
Subject: Road closure Tuesday city meeting
This message is from Shawn at the cheese shop. I understand you need an email from me stating that I strongly disagree
with the road closures in old town. So this is it. I think that every day is extreme and highly unnecessary. The whole idea
is objectionable On so many points. In fact the businesses that were not involved in making this decision may be
discriminated against. Please confirm that this is what you needed for the council meeting tomorrow thank you.
Sent from my iPad
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:24 PM
To: Milad Gendy
Subject: RE: road closing
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randijohl@temecuiaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Milad Gendy <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:19 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: road closing
Hi. I am milad Gendy from old town sweet shop and I am against close the road, it will effect my business.
Thanks
Milad Gendy
Old Town Sweet Shop
1
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:43 PM
To: 'Steven R. Lewis'
Subject: RE: STREET CLOSURE
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca goy
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Steven R. Lewis <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 2:39 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Fw: STREET CLOSURE
Steven Lewis
Director,
Family Legal Centers
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Steven R. Lewis <
To: randi. mohl temecu Ia. ca.clov <randi.johl cr,temecula.ca.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 02:36:35 PM PDT
Subject: Fw: STREET CLOSURE
Steven Lewis
Director,
Family Legal Centers
----- Forwarded Message
From: Steven R. Lewis <
To: "randi.iohlCcDtemecualea.gov" <randi.iohlCc�temecualca.gov>
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020, 03:21:43 PM PDT
Subject: STREET CLOSURE
DEAR COUNCIL MEMBERS,
MY NAME IS STEVE LEWIS, IM THE OWNER OF FAMILY LEGAL CENTERS IN THE GAMBLING
COWBOY BUILDING LOCATED AT 42072 5TH ST, TEMECULA CA.
I KNOW YOU COLLECTIVELY THINK THAT THE CURRENT STREET CLOSURE COULD HELP
THE OLD TOWN BUSINESS COMMUNITY, BUT I
FIRMY BELIEVE ALONG WITH NUMEROUS OTHER BUSINESS OWNERS THAT YOUR
DECISION DOES NOT REPRESENT THE MAJORITY OF OWNERS AND COULD PROVE TO BE
THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMELS BACK .... ESPECIALLY DURING THIS COVID-19
RECOVERY PERIOD.
NOW IS NOT THE THE TIME TO DISPROPORTUNATELY EXPERIMENT WITH OUR
LIVELYHOODS... YOU HAVE NO RIGHT WITHOUT DOING THE PROPER RESEARCH TO
INCLUDE, HAVING MORE PUBLIC HEARINGS, TO MAKE SUCH DECISIONS THAT COULD
ADVERSELY AFFECT SO MANY....
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
STEVE LEWIS
DIRECTOR / OWNER
FAMILY LEGAL CENTERS
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:22 PM
To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery
Subject: RE: City Council meeting regarding street closure - from Coin Op
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl(o)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Thomas Kinkade -gallery <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:20 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: City Council meeting regarding street closure - from Coin Op
Randi -
Please see the email below from Coin Op, regarding the street closure.
People keep receiving bounce back emails that their emails are not going through to you.
Thanks.
Jessica
Thomas Kinkade at Old Town
28545 Old Town Front St.
Suite # 103
Temecula, CA 92590
(
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Peter Riccobono <
To: Thomas Kinkade -gallery <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 03:10:35 PM PDT
Subject: Re: Please submit your comments and vote to City Council today, for their meeting tomorrow on the street
closure
Hello,
My name is Peter Riccobono and I am an owner/operator of Coin -Op Game Room located on Fourth and Front
Street. We as a company are against the street closure as we believe it would negatively affect our business. Please
delay any closures until this can be voted on by local business owners.
Thank you
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 2:47 PM Thomas Kinkade -gallery < wrote:
Send it here, I will forward it to Randi
Thomas Kinkade at Old Town
28545 Old Town Front St.
Suite #103
Temecula, CA 92590
(
On Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 02:42:14 PM PDT, Peter Riccobono < wrote:
Yeah I tried that. I will send you my email
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 23, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Thomas Kinkade -gallery < wrote:
A couple people did, they sent the email over incorrectly originally
Try
Randi.]ohl@tenieculaca. gov
If that doesn't work, let me know and I can forward your email.
Thomas Kinkade at Old Town
28545 Old Town Front St.
Suite # 103
Temecula, CA 92590
(
On Tuesday, June 23, 2020, 02:24:34 PM PDT, Peter Riccobono < wrote:
I just sent out my email but am receiving a message that says blocked. Is anyone else having this issue.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:35 AM Thomas Kinkade -gallery < wrote:
Happy Monday!
We just received notice the that City Council will be voting again on closing the street,
tomorrow Tuesday the 23rd. The current plan is to start the street closure on this Wednesday
the 24th and it will go on indefinitely.
The City Council meeting will be online, due to covid.
Despite the emails I have sent, the city would like to hear from individual owners,
regarding the street closures, and have only given us 24 hours for individual owners to
submit their comments via email.
Please send an email today with your thoughts on the street closure to
Randi Johl
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:19 PM
To:
Subject: RE: Comment for tonight's meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca. ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: John Kelliher <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:52 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Comment for tonight's meeting
Randi,
Please enter this comment into the record at tonight's city council meeting. It relates to the agenda item
regarding creating a pedestrian -only zone on Front Street in Old Town.
Since Visit Temecula Valley was founded, its Board Members have discussed with enthusiasm and hope the
possibility of a pedestrian zone in Old Town. Great destinations throughout the world have thriving pedestrian
zones that become centers of social and economic vibrancy for visitors and locals alike. But few destinations
have the ideal climate of Temecula, making an outdoor pedestrian zone an almost year-round attraction.
There are many hurdles to consider, but at this unprecedented moment, there are compelling reasons to push
past these hurdles to provide opportunities to business owners who have been shut down by government
decree, and who now are opened but are forced to operate at capacity levels that can not sustain their
business. Throughout the United States, eating and drinking establishments are literally moving out into the
streets to expand their capacity and serve customers in a socially -distanced way.
If nothing else, now is the time for a long-awaited experiment to determine if a pedestrian zone provides
positives that outweigh the negatives. If pedestrian zones in other destinations are any indication, then it is
likely that even the detractors will become fans once they witness the vibrancy that a pedestrian zone can
provide.
Cheers!
John Kelliher
Founder and Chief Wino
A�
Office: 951-693-5755 1 GoGrape.com
Wvr1d's First Hardtop co Veoblp §hy
Follow Us:
Q facebookO 9vustapam
Randi Johl
From:
Randi Johl
Sent:
Tuesday, June 23, 2020 5:48 PM
To:
Al Rubio
Subject:
RE: Comment regarding Old Town Temecula outdoor dining for 6/23 Council meeting
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.'ohl temeculaca, ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Al Rubio <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 4:53 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Comment regarding Old Town Temecula outdoor dining for 6/23 Council meeting
Dear Honorable City Council,
I would like to encourage the City to persevere with your plans to help Old Town businesses, create
opportunities, and embrace creative innovations, while following County guidelines regarding physical
distancing and sanitizing. I would ask the City to allow for more feedback from merchants, so that they can
construct a plan with consideration of all concerns. In addition, I would suggest the City to more publicly
promote its intentions to market the closure of front street as a "Summer Nights" Activity to drive traffic to
ALL Old Town businesses.
• Lastly, I encourage the City to address how it will market and promote visitation in Old Town.
Sincerely,
Al Rubio I Chairman of the Board
Chairman's Choice Recipient 2019
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
26790 Ynez Court, Ste. A
Temecula, CA 92591
1
Subject:FW: Public Comment
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:19 PM
To: Latina Association <
Subject: RE: Public Comment
Thank you for your email. It is received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. If you do not wish
for your email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting, please let me know. Thank you.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director / City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Latina Association <
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 6:10 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Comment
Temecula Council Members and Mayor Pro Tem Edwards,
I'd like to remind you of the responsibility we entrusted you to protect everyone regardless of your personal political
alliance.
I'm extremely concerned at the lack of enforcement the city has toward businesses that allow full capacity and without
a mask; specifically, the bars and restaurants in Old Tow.
Please, I urged you to take a strong stand on the matter.
Respectfully,
--
Martha Angelica Howard
Latina Association of Riverside County, President
Former Temecula City Council District 5 Candidate 2018
Temecula Woman of the Year NAACP-W.I.N. 2018
2
Latina Association of Riverside County
"To make a difference through engaging in public policy, education, and culture affirmation."
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Latina-Association-of-Riverside-County/209501775871863