Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07232020 PTS AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC / TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JULY 23, 2020 - 6:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with this order, the public may only view/listen to the meeting online at https://temeculaca.gov/tv and not in the Council Chamber. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this meeting, please submit your comments by email to the Administrative Assistant at tammy.petricka@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the Public Comments item being called. Email comments on an agenda item must be submitted prior to the close of public comments on that agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at noticed meetings. Electronic comments may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted . Reading of Public Comments: Email comments will be read into the record, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Public/Traffic Safety Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at noticed meetings . CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Sullivan FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Moses ROLL CALL: Carter, Hagel, Moses, Richardson, Sullivan PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Public/Traffic Safety Commission on items that are listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda . Page 1 Public / Traffic Safety Commission Agenda July 23, 2020 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public Traffic Safety Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action . 1.Approve Action Minutes of June 25, 2020 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes of June 25, 2020. Recommendation: Action MinutesAttachments: BUSINESS 2.Approve Change in Ordinance Regarding Bicycles on Sidewalks That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend the City Council approve the change in ordinance regarding bicycles on sidewalks from Chapter 10.24.040 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Recommendation: Agenda Report Exhibit A Attachments: 3.Traffic Calming on Harveston Drive - Stop Controls Analysis 1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersection of Harveston Drive and Mendocino Lane/Fairmont Place. 2. Direct staff to coordinate the proposed landscape maintenance and removal alternatives to improve intersection sight distances along Harveston Drive intersections with City Landscape Maintenance Department and the Harveston Community Association, Board of Directors. Recommendation: Agenda Report Exhibits A - D Collision Reports-Intersection 12-Month Attachments: DIVISION REPORTS Traffic Engineer's Report Traffic Engineer's ReportAttachments: California Highway Patrol Report California Highway Patrol ReportAttachments: Page 2 Public / Traffic Safety Commission Agenda July 23, 2020 Fire Chief's Report Fire Chief's Report.pdfAttachments: Police Chief's Report Police Chief's ReportAttachments: DIRECTOR REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Public Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, August 27, 2020, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC Due to the closure of City Hall, the library and other city facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the full agenda packet (Including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), will only be available for viewing on the City’s website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx at least 72 hours prior to meeting. If you have questions regarding an item on the agenda, please contact the Public Works Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 3 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PUBLIC / TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 25, 2020 - 6:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with this order, the public may only view/listen to the meeting online at https://temeculaca.gov/tv and not in the Council Chamber. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this meeting, please submit your comments by email to the Administrative Assistant at tammy.petricka@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the Public Comments item being called. Email comments on an agenda item must be submitted prior to the close of public comments on that agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at noticed meetings. Electronic comments may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: Email comments will be read into the record, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Public/Traffic Safety Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at noticed meetings. CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairperson Sullivan FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Hagel ROLL CALL: Carter, Hagel, Moses, Richardson, Sullivan PRESENTATIONS Fiscal Years 2021-25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Proposed Budget PUBLIC COMMENTS – None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approve Action Minutes of May 28, 2020 Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes of May 28, 2020. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Richardson, Second by Hagel. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 2 BUSINESS 2. Consideration of Minor Street Stop Controls within Alta Vista Development Recommendation: 1. Approve installation of Minor Street Stop Controls within the Alta Vista Development at the following locations:  Along Mira Loma Drive (major through street) at the following cross streets: Candida Drive, Remora Street, and Veronda Place.  Along Candida Drive, at the following cross streets: Senela Place and terminus at Agena Street.  Along Escolacata Drive, at the following cross streets: Caprice Court and terminus into Remora Street. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Hagel, Second by Carter. The vote reflected unanimous approval. Commission recommended the addition of a stop sign at Agena Street and Alpha Place. DIVISION REPORTS Traffic Engineer's Report California Highway Patrol Report Fire Chief's Report Police Chief's Report DIRECTOR REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT At 7:26 PM, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Thursday, July 23, 2020, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Bradley Sullivan, Chairperson Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer 1 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 23, 2020 SUBJECT Approve Change in Ordinance Regarding Bicycles on Sidewalks PREPARED BY: Ron Moreno, Principal Civil Engineer Kaitlyn Iacobacci, Office Specialist II REVIEWED BY: Ali Shahzad, Senior Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend the City Council approve the change in ordinance regarding bicycles on sidewalks from Chapter 10.24.040 of the Temecula Municipal Code. BACKGROUND: Staff received a request from the Trails / Open Space Ad Hoc Subcommittee (Council Members Naggar and Schwank) to consider a revision to the ordinance of Chapter 10.24.040 of the Temecula Municipal Code that reads as follows: Current Ordinance: 10.24.040 Bicycles on sidewalks – When allowed. A. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10.24.030, bicycles and unicycles may be ridden along portions or segments of sidewalks wherever expressly permitted by resolution of the city council, but not until such sidewalk areas have been appropriately designated by the city engineer with signs or markings to give due notice to the pedestrian and cycling public. Section 10.24.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code reads as follows: 10.24.030 Driving vehicles on sidewalks—Generally prohibited. A. Unless otherwise expressly allowed by another provision of this title or other applicable law, no person shall drive a vehicle (including any bicycle or unicycle) within any sidewalk area or parkway except at a permanent or temporary driveway. The ordinance should be revised as seen in Exhibit A. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission’s consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process. 2 FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost for signage as necessary. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A – Ordinance No. 20- ORDINANCE NO. 20- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 10.24.040 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING BICYCLES ON SIDEWALKS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 10.24.040 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.24.040 Bicycles on sidewalks—When allowed. A. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10.24.030, bicycles may be ridden on sidewalks except as follows: 1. No person shall ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk within any business district; upon the sidewalks of bridges; in pedestrian underpasses; on pedestrian overpasses; or upon sidewalks adjacent to any school building. 2. No person shall ride a bicycle upon a sidewalk in an area where riding a bicycle or unicycle is prohibited by resolution of the City Council and appropriate signage is posted advising of the prohibition. B. Any person riding a bicycle upon a sidewalk shall yield the right-of-way to any pedestrian, and when overtaking and passing a pedestrian, shall give an audible signal and shall pass to the left of the pedestrian only under conditions permitting such movement in safety. Any person riding a bicycle, upon entering a roadway or driveway from a sidewalk, shall yield to all traffic. C. As used in this section the following words are defined as follows: 1. “Bicycle” means a device upon which any person may ride, propelled exclusively by human power through a belt, chain, or gears, and having one or more wheels including, but not limited to, a bicycle, electric bicycle, unicycle, skateboard, roller skates, or other wheeled toys. 2. “Sidewalk” means that portion of City right of way designated or used for pedestrian travel, including, but not limited to, sidewalks and portions of sidewalks. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , . Maryann Edwards, Mayor Pro-Tem ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 1 AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 23, 2020 SUBJECT: Traffic Calming on Harveston Drive – Stop Controls Analysis Prepared By: Erick Escobedo, Assistant Engineer II – Traffic Reviewed By: Ali Shahzad, Senior Traffic Engineer – Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission: 1. Recommend the City Council adopt a Resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop Controls at the intersection of Harveston Drive and Mendocino Lane/Fairmont Place. 2. Direct staff to coordinate the proposed landscape maintenance and removal alternatives to improve intersection sight distances along Harveston Drive intersections with City Landscape Maintenance Department and the Harveston Community Association, Board of Directors. BACKGROUND: In May 2020, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission considered a request to implement traffic calming measures on Harveston Drive to address concerns of excessive vehicular speeds. At that May 2020 meeting, Staff was directed to conduct a Stop Warrant Analysis with traffic volume data collection to review the feasibility of implementing multi-way stop controls at three identified intersections. (Exhibit A). These intersections included: 1. Harveston Drive at Chatham Lane, 2. Harveston Drive at Mendocino Lane/Fairmont Place and 3. Harveston Drive at Newport Road Harveston Drive is a forty-six (46) foot wide residential collector roadway providing access to numerous single family and multi-family residences within the Harveston Community. The posted speed limit on Harveston Drive varies throughout the community due to varying roadway conditions. The speed limit of 35 MPH is posted on the segment of Harveston Drive south of Lakeview Road to Harveston Way. The speed limit of 30 MPH is posted on the segment of Harveston Drive north of Lakeview Road to Evanston Place. The posted speed limit then reduces to 25 MPH on Harveston Drive east of Evanston Place as it is fronted by the Ysabel Barnett Elementary School (Exhibit D). 2 The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on Harveston Drive is approximately 2,512 ADT for segment south of Lakeview Road to Harveston Way, and 1,871 ADT for segment north of Lakeview Road to Evanston Place.  Chatham Lane is a forty (40) foot wide local residential roadway that provides access to numerous single family residences south of Harveston Drive and is adjacent to the east side of Harveston Community Park. Chatham Lane has a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 668 ADT.  Newport Road is a forty (40) foot wide residential roadway that provides access to numerous single-family residences south of Harveston Drive. Newport Road has a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 1339 ADT. Both these streets are the same intersection to Harveston, the names change across the intersection.  Mendocino Lane is a forty (40) foot wide residential roadway that functions as a residential collector roadway providing access to numerous single-family residences east of Harveston Drive. Mendocino Lane has a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 604 ADT. This leg of the intersection is located on the concave of the horizontal curve.  Fairmont Place is a forty (40) foot wide residential roadway that functions as a residential collector roadway providing access to numerous single-family residences west of Harveston Drive. Fairmont Place has a prima facie speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 539 ADT. This leg of the intersection is located on the convex of the horizontal curve. In January 2020, Staff collected volume data over a three (3) day period, which included entering volume data at the intersections of Harveston Drive at Chatham Lane, Mendocino Lane/Fairmont Place and Newport Road. The volume data was used to establish circulation patterns and determine potential “cut-through” traffic volumes. In addition to the data collection, a review of conditions was performed, which included an evaluation of sight distance, collision history, and completion of a multi-way stop warrant analysis at the three (3) intersections. An evaluation of sight distance was performed at the three intersections with Harveston Drive. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of 250 feet is required for the posted 35 mph speed limit south of Lakeview Road and 200 feet for the posted 30 mph speed limit north of Lakeview Road. The results of the evaluation are shown in the table below: Location Sight Distance Required Visibility (Posted 35 MPH) Chatham Lane  Looking West  Looking East 650’ 560’ 250’ 250’ 3 Location Sight Distance Required Visibility (Posted 30 MPH) Mendocino Lane  Looking North  Looking South 235’ 155’ 250’ 250’ Fairmont Place  Looking North  Looking South 500’ 550’ 250’ 250’ Newport Road  Looking West  Looking East 430’ 280’ 200’ 200’ As shown, the visibility at the intersection is appropriate for conditions at Chatham Lane and Newport Road. However, the visibility at Mendocino Lane/Fairmont Place falls below the required minimum distance due to the concave roadway alignment and landscaping constraints. A review of intersection collision history was performed on Harveston Drive. The intersection collision history for the twelve (12) month period from June 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020, indicates there were no reported collisions at the three (3) intersections studied. The favorable records are attributed to driver familiarity with roadway conditions and exercising due care when entering and travelling on Harveston Drive. The Multi-Way Stop Sign Installation Policy for Residential Streets’ warrant criteria was used to evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs at the intersections of Harveston Drive at Chatham Lane, Mendocino Lane/Fairmont Place and Newport Road. The warrants allow for the installation of multi-way stop signs when the following conditions are satisfied: 1. Minimum Traffic Volumes a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is equal to or greater than three-hundred (300) vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day and b) The combined vehicular volume and pedestrian volume from the minor street is equal to or greater than one-hundred (100) per hour for the same eight (8) hours. 2. Collision History a) Three (3) or more reported collisions within a twelve (12) month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions 3. Roadway Characteristics a) The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles per day, 4 b) The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs; c) The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split; and d) Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. WARRANTS 1, 2, and 3 MUST BE SATISFIED Other criteria that may be considered when evaluating the need for multi-way stop signs include: 4. Visibility a) The intersections sight distance is less than:  150 feet for 25 MPH  200 feet for 30 MPH  250 feet for 35 MPH 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route to School plan. 8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. 9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs for the residential area. The Multi-Way Stop Warrant analysis performed at the three (3) intersections indicates that Warrants 1, 2, and 3 are not satisfied and multi-way stop signs are not justified. The Policy does however provide the flexibility to consider multi-way stop signs at locations where there is a need to provide right-of-way control to eliminate conflicts between vehicles due to visibility constraints. An evaluation of the intersection sight distance criteria indicates there is justification for multi-way stop signs at the intersection of Harveston Drive at Mendocino Lane/Fairmont Place due to limited sight distance. A copy of the warrant analysis is attached (Exhibit B). Staff recommends establishing multi-way stop controls at the intersection of Harveston Drive at Mendocino Lane/Fairmont Place and maintaining the present level of control at the other intersections along Harveston Drive. Additionally, at the May 2020 meeting, Staff received several public comments on various other Harveston Drive intersections requesting evaluation of stop controls and sight distance. These intersections included Harveston Drive at Auburn Lane, Lakehouse Road/Savannah Drive and Pasadena Drive/Charleston Lane (Exhibit C). As discussed in review of the three intersections in this report, conditions for the area would not satisfy the required warrants to justify installation of multi-way stop controls. A field review was performed at each intersection and it was found 5 that required sight distance could be achieved with trimming and removals or existing landscape adjacent to these intersections. Staff recommends coordinating the proposed landscape maintenance and removal alternatives to improve intersection sight distances at the noted Harveston Drive intersections with City Landscape Maintenance Department and the Harveston Community Association, Board of Directors. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission’s consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process and by mail. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with installing signs and associated pavement markings. Adequate funds are available in the Traffic Division’s operating budget. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map (Exhibit A) 2. Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis (Exhibit B) 3. Sight Distance Review Map (Exhibit C) 4. Harveston Speed Limits (Exhibit D) 5. Collision Reports A Major Street: 35 MPH Minor Street:25 MPH Yes No X 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM Hour Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes No X split, and 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 250 feet for 35 MPH Satisfied 285 216 100 267 the intersection. 9.The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 3 OR MORE NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS per day, B.The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away The intersection sight distance is less than: 155 feet for 25 MPH 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. 8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Critical Approach Speed Critical Approach Speed Satisfied1.Minimum Vehicular Volume Harveston Drive Chatham Lane MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Total All Approaches Combined Vehicular 300 261 287 197 200 feet for 30 MPH 0 (Minor Street) 3. Roadway Characteristics from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. 4. Visibility 181 45 60 45 58 56 56 38 36 318 Satisfied 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied (All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) 2. Collision History Satisfied Ped Volume EXHIBIT B Major Street: 35 MPH Minor Street:25 MPH Yes No X 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM Hour Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No split, and 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 250 feet for 35 MPH Satisfied 280 196 100 226 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 3 OR MORE NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS per day, the intersection. 9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. The intersection sight distance is less than: 155 feet for 25 MPH 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. 8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Critical Approach Speed Critical Approach Speed Satisfied1. Minimum Vehicular Volume Harveston Drive Fairmont Place/Mendocino Lane Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Total All Approaches Combined Vehicular 300 282 267 322 200 feet for 30 MPH 0 (Minor Street) 3. Roadway Characteristics from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. 4. Visibility 198 95 104 59 80 95 96 105 63 221 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away Ped Volume (All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) 2. Collision History Satisfied Satisfied Major Street: 35 MPH Minor Street:25 MPH Yes No X 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM Hour Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No Yes No X Yes No X Ped Volume (All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) 2. Collision History Satisfied Satisfied 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. C. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) A. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) 178 87 135 84 73 172 109 152 73 187 417 253 291 200 feet for 30 MPH 1 (Minor Street) 3. Roadway Characteristics from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, D. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. 4. Visibility MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Total All Approaches Combined Vehicular 300 MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Critical Approach Speed Critical Approach Speed Satisfied1. Minimum Vehicular Volume Harveston Drive Newport Rd Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied B. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away The intersection sight distance is less than: 155 feet for 25 MPH 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. 8. There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. 9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. Satisfied 424 209 100 189 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 3 OR MORE NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS per day, split, and 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 250 feet for 35 MPH This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site andis for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not beaccurate, current, or otherwise reliable.8,000© Latitude Geographics Group Ltd.1,333.3THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION1:WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_SphereFeet1,333.30NotesLegend666.67ParcelsStreet NamesHighwaysHWYINTERCHANGEINTERSTATEOFFRAMPONRAMPUSHWYHospitalsCity of Temecula BoundaryStreets<all other values>COLLECTORLIMITED SECONDARY ARTERIALLOCALMAJOR ARTERIALMODIFIED SECONDARY ARTERIALPRINCIPAL ARTERIALPRIVATERURAL HIGHWAYSECONDARY ARTERIALURBAN ARTERIALCreeksCitiesPublic FacilitiesParksSchoolsExhibit C - Sight Distance Review MapIntersection SightDistance Review Collision Summary ReportCity of TemeculaPublic Works Traffic Division7/9/20From 06/01/2019 to 05/31/2020Total Collisions: 0Injury Collisions: 0Fatal Collisions: 0HARVESTON DR & CHATHAM LNPage 1 of 1Settings for Query:Start Date: 06/01/2019, End Date: 05/31/2020 (on PD Data)Street: HARVESTON DRCross Street: CHATHAM LNIntersection Related: TrueCity: TemeculaSorted By: Date and Time Collision Summary ReportCity of TemeculaPublic Works Traffic Division7/9/20From 06/01/2019 to 05/31/2020Total Collisions: 0Injury Collisions: 0Fatal Collisions: 0HARVESTON DR & FAIRMONT PLPage 1 of 1Settings for Query:Start Date: 06/01/2019, End Date: 05/31/2020 (on PD Data)Street: HARVESTON DRCross Street: FAIRMONT PLIntersection Related: TrueCity: TemeculaSorted By: Date and Time Collision Summary ReportCity of TemeculaPublic Works Traffic Division7/9/20From 06/01/2019 to 05/31/2020Total Collisions: 0Injury Collisions: 0Fatal Collisions: 0HARVESTON DR & MENDOCINO LNPage 1 of 1Settings for Query:Start Date: 06/01/2019, End Date: 05/31/2020 (on PD Data)Street: HARVESTON DRCross Street: MENDOCINO LNIntersection Related: TrueCity: TemeculaSorted By: Date and Time Collision Summary ReportCity of TemeculaPublic Works Traffic Division7/9/20From 06/01/2019 to 05/31/2020Total Collisions: 0Injury Collisions: 0Fatal Collisions: 0HARVESTON DR & NEWPORT RDPage 1 of 1Settings for Query:Start Date: 06/01/2019, End Date: 05/31/2020 (on PD Data)Street: HARVESTON DRCross Street: NEWPORT RDIntersection Related: TrueCity: TemeculaSorted By: Date and Time California Highway Patrol Temecula Area Report for June 2020 This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Enforcement Activity •Citations Issued - 227 •Verbal Warnings - 75 •CHP 422’s - 15 •Total Enforcement Contacts •391 This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Services Provided •Motorist Services - 182 •Child Safety Seat Installations - 12 •Other Programs (Start Smart, Every 15 Minutes) This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC Traffic Collisions •Non-Injury - 78 •Injury - 49 •Fatal - 3 •Fatal Year to Date - 13 •Total Collisions - 139 Fatal Traffic Collisions / Major Investigations •S/B I-215 north of Scott Road •Red Mountain Road north of Sage Road •SR-74 at Ethanac Road This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND Driving Under the Influence •Monthly Arrests - 33 •Monthly Drug DUI arrests - 6 •Upcoming Proactive DUI Enforcement – 4 th of July MEP This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-ND This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA City of Temecula Fire Department Report Incidents Reported for the month of June 2020 and City of Temecula and Both (Code 2, Alpha, Omega Code 3, Charlie, Delta, Bravo, Echo) City of Temecula Fire Department Report Call Comparison for Month and year to date Month 2019 YTD 2020 YTD June 761 700 Year Total 4463 4142 City of Temecula Fire Department Report Plan Review and Inspections June Year to date Plan Review 308 1575 Construction Inspections 207 980 Annual Inspections 573 2806 Counter/Public Inquiries 27 463 Fire Department Prevention Plan Review and Inspections City of Temecula Fire Department Report SEEK TIC High Resolution Thermal Imagining Cameras Compact and attaches to firefighter gear Purchased •AMR Fine Money •1 TIC Per Seat Per Equipment Benefits •Life Saving •Search and Rescue •Fire •Traffic Collisions •Reduce time frame for fire victims •Situational awareness •Adds Safety to all emergency operations in Temecula Created by: Sergeant Joseph Greco #2549 Temecula PD/Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report Temecula Traffic Incidents, Activities and Events Report for the month of May 2020 Created by: Sergeant Joseph Greco #2549 Temecula PD/Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report Total Hazardous Citations 417 Total Non-Hazardous Citations 92 (Seatbelt cites included) 28 (Cell phone cites included) 31 Parking Citations 93 Total Citations Issued 602 Written Warnings Issued 161 City Funded Targeted Enforcement (S.L.A.P. Cite included) 94 (Commercial Enforcement Cites included) 2 Created by: Sergeant Joseph Greco #2549 Temecula PD/Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report D.U.I. Arrests 23 D.U.I. Arrests YTD 120 D.U.I. Previous Year 444 OTS/City Funded Special Operations DUI Checkpoints 0 Know Your Limit Campaign 0 DUI Sweep 0 Targeted Traffic Enforcement Saturation 0 Created by: Sergeant Joseph Greco #2549 Temecula PD/Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report 2019/2020 – Citations / Incidents Jan Feb Mar 3 Month Total Citations Issued for Hazardous Violations (Moving Violations) 1753 1282 342 3377 Non -Hazardous Citations 497 245 66 808 “Click It or Ticket” (May) and/or Seatbelt Violations 63 49 8 120 Distracted Driver (Cell Phone Use) 214 114 21 349 Parking Citations 192 132 120 444 Written Warning Citations 316 262 57 635 Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program (SLAP) “Red Lights” 288 213 49 550 Commercial Enforcement Cites 13 16 8 37 Injury Collisions 36 26 24 89 DUI Arrests 20 31 18 69 2019/2020 – Citations / Incidents Feb Mar Apr 3 Month Total Citations Issued for Hazardous Violations (Moving Violations) 1282 342 41 1665 Non-Hazardous Citations 245 66 8 319 “Click It or Ticket” (May) and/or Seatbelt Violations 49 8 2 59 Distracted Driver (Cell Phone Use) 114 21 5 140 Parking Citations 132 120 64 316 Written Warning Citations 262 57 17 336 Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program (SLAP) “Red Lights” 213 49 2 264 Commercial Enforcement Cites 16 8 0 24 Injury Collisions 26 24 10 60 DUI Arrests 31 18 11 60 2019/2020 – Citations / Incidents Mar Apr May 3 Month Total Citations Issued for Hazardous Violations (Moving Violations) 342 41 711 1094 Non-Hazardous Citations 66 8 80 154 “Click It or Ticket” (May) and/or Seatbelt Violations 8 2 23 33 Distracted Driver (Cell Phone Use) 21 5 64 80 Parking Citations 120 64 64 248 Written Warning Citations 57 17 332 406 Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program (SLAP) “Red Lights” 49 2 179 230 Commercial Enforcement Cites 8 0 5 13 Injury Collisions 24 10 13 47 DUI Arrests 18 11 17 46 2019/2020 – Citations / Incidents Apr May June 3 Month Total Citations Issued for Hazardous Violations (Moving Violations) 41 711 417 1169 Non-Hazardous Citations 8 80 92 180 “Click It or Ticket” (May) and/or Seatbelt Violations 2 23 28 53 Distracted Driver (Cell Phone Use) 5 64 31 100 Parking Citations 64 64 93 221 Written Warning Citations 17 332 161 510 Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program (SLAP) “Red Lights” 2 179 94 275 Commercial Enforcement Cites 0 5 2 7 Injury Collisions 10 13 23 46 DUI Arrests 11 17 23 51 Created by: Sergeant Joseph Greco #2549 Temecula PD/Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report Commission Members City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Traffic Division Activities/Events Community Action Patrol supported call -outs: N/A CAP Meetings: (1) June 11, 2020 Community Action Patrol activity / patrol hours: 13 hours June Activity Hours: 13 / year-to-date: 1814 N/A May Patrol Hours: 101/ year-to-date: 1296 N/A There were (0) CAP patrols with (0) members participating Training: 03 CAP members completed online training in VIMS = 13.5 hours 02 Reserve members completed Lexipol = 3 hours Special Events CAP Participated In: 0 N/A Volunteer Administration Hours: 0 N/A Reserve officer hours (patrol): 0 N/A Training/Meeting hours: Meetings: Meeting Cancelled N/A Total June Volunteer hours: 254 YTD is 2387 Created by: Sergeant Joseph Greco #2549 Temecula PD/Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report FBI Part 1 Crime Statistics Unavailable