Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout121703 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to1 participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. J Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35,104 ADA T t e ] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE DECEMBER 17, 2003 - 6:00 P.M. Next in Order: Resolution: No. 2003-064 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: Commissioner Guerriero Roll Call: Guerriem, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chiniaeff PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Agenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of December 17, 2003 R:~PLANCOMM~Agendas~2003\I 2-17-03.doc 1 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION 2.1 Approve the Minutes of November 19, 2003 COMMISSION BUSINESS 3 Margarita Medical Plaza Sign Program RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Continued from November 19, 2003 4 Plannin.q Application No. PA03-0347 submitted by Griffin Communities, is a product review for 100 detached single family residences within Planninq Area 4A of the Roripau,qh Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinqs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road {APN: 957-340-001 ), Dan Lonq, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Requesting a continuance to January 7, 2004. Continued from December 3, 2003 5 Planninq Application No. PA03-0432, PA03-0433, PA03-0435, and PA03-0436 Four product reviews within the Harveston Specific Plan [{Tracts 30668, 30668-1, 30669-1 (Sarasota); 30667, 30667-2 {Chatham); 30667-1, 30667-3 (St. Auqustine); 30668-2, & 30669-2 (Auburn Ln.)l generally located south of Harveston Lake, north of Loop Rd. and east of Loop Road, Sheila Powers, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:\PLANCOMMV~gendas~003\I 2-17-03.doc 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0432 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 109-LOT SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (SARASOTA, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 2). 5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0433 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 78-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (CHATHAM, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 1). 5.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0435 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 93-LOT SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (ST. AUGUSTINE, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 1) 5.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0436 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 119-LOT SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (AUBURN LN. PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 2). COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 January 7, 2004 R:~PLANCOMM\Agendas~003\I 2-17-03.doc 3 ITEM #2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 19, 2003 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:01 P.M., on Wednesday November 19, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Olhasso led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, OIhasso, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff ABSENT None PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Agenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of November 19, 2003 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of November 5, 2003 3 Director's Hearinq Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for October 2003 R:'~Min ut es P C',2003\111903 1 MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve Item Nos. 1-3. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Per the request of Planning Director Ubnoske, Item No. 7 was moved off calendar; see page 9. 4 Planning Application No. PA00-0507 a Development Plan to desiqn and construct a three- story, 31,600 square foot, 56-unit hotel building on 1.35 acres. The proiect site is located approximately 200 feet east of Jefferson Avenue and 200 feet north of Winchester Road RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- 060 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0507 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN - JEFFERSON AVENUE INN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A THREE STORY, 31,600 SQUARE FOOT HOTEL BUILDING ON A 1.35 ACRE VACANT PARCEL, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET EAST OF JEFFERSON AVENUE AND 200 FEET NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD TO THE SOUTH OF THE COMFORT INN MOTEL, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-282- O07 Associate Planner Harris presented a brief report (as per agenda material), noting the following: · That the applicant revised the project by eliminating the fourth floor of the building and reducing the number of hotel rooms from 70 to 56; Far Reduction · That the new Floor Area Ratio (FAR) will be 0.53; that the original proposal was .71; · That staff is of the opinion that the FAR will be commensurate with other recently approved hotel facilities on similar size parcels; · That staff recommended the proposed FAR. Central Air Conditioning That staff would request that Condition of Approval No. 14 be deleted (a central air conditioning system shall be incorporated into the hotel building construction drawing. All individual hotel room conditioning units shall be removed); that such a condition would not be a Development Code Requirement. R:\MinutesPC~2003\l 11903 2 RV~l'ruck Parking That staff requested that Condition of Approval No. 5b be deleted (two 10' x25' parking spaces shall be added onsite. The spaces shall be designated for recreational vehicle, truck and trailer parking only); that such a condition would not be a Development Code Requirement. Facility Maintenance · That staff added a recommended condition of approval requiring that the hotel facility be fully maintained throughout the life of the facility (see condition No.15). Landscaping That an arborist assessment report be prepared at the applicant's expense to assertain the health of existing slope trees and shrubs within the Caltrans right-of-way abutting the full length of the eastern property line; that if the trees and shrubs are unhealthy, the applicant shall prepare a revised landscape plan showing enhanced landscaping around the property line subject to the Planning Director's review and approval; That staff determined that the three-story hotel complex consisting of 56 units, as conditioned, will be consistent with the City's General Plan, Design Guidelines, and Development Code; That the only major change to the site plan would be that the interior of the pool be moved to the rear of the facility located within the 15 noise contour area; that this area has an exterior noise level which exceeds 70 decibels; that the applicant has submitted a noise study which recommended the erection of an eight-foot tall wall around the pool to reduce the noise at the pool area below the 70 decibel maximum required in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Staff would be of the opinion that the proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and the City Design Guidelines; and therefore, would recommend approval of the Development Plan with the deletion of Condition of Approval Nos. 14 and 5b and the revision of Condition No. 20g. For Commissioner Telesio, Associate Planner Harris confirmed that Condition No. 5b would be deleted. For Commissioner Mathewson, Associate Planner Harris reiterated that Condition No. 14 would be deleted based on the fact that the building will be significantly screened; that it is not a Development Code requirement; and that the wrought iron screening will further screen the units. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Larry Markham, 41635 Enterprise Circle, representing the applicant, and noted that the applicant is in concurrence with the deletion of Condition of Approval Nos. 5b and 14 that with regard to Condition No. 20g, the applicant will not be immediately building an eight-foot tall wall. At this time, the public hearing was closed. R:'uMinutesPC~2003\l 11903 3 MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation subject to the changes of the condition deleting Condition No. 5b and 14 and amending No. 20g. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 5 Planning Application No. PA03-0347 submitted by Griffin Communities, is a product review for 100 detached sin.qle family residences within Planninq Area 4A of the Roripauqh Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of the future extension of Butter[ield Sta.qe Road (APN: 957-340-001 ) RECQMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA63-0347 A PRODUCT REVIEW FOR DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 4A OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED SOUTH OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 957-340-001 TRACT MAP 29661-4 Associate Planner Long, by way of Power Point, presented the report (as per agenda material), noting the following: That the proposed project will include 99 units, not 100 (as per agenda material); that the proposed resolution has been corrected; · That the proposed project will include four architectural styles, including Mediterranean, Monterey, Ranch, and Craftsman; · That the applicant proposed various elements which staff has reviewed, and which are in compliance with the Specific Plan Design Guidelines; · That one of the four floor plans will be a single-story project; · That the Design Guidelines require four-sided amhitecture; · That the applicant has proposed various elements that staff has reviewed and that it will be in compliance with the Specific Plan Design Guidelines; · That the focal point of the front elevations will be the front door; · That all the projects have either a covered entry or a front porch area; · That one of the requirements in the Specific Plan will be to avoid the canyon-like affect; R:~vlint~t es PC~2003\111903 4 · That 50% of the projects are required to provide architecture forward; that all proposed projects meet this requirement; · That all plots will include decorative hardscape; · That the fencing plan has been reviewed and determined acceptable; That staff determined that the proposed project will be consistent with the Design Guidelines of the Specific Plan and the General Plan; however, the following are minor changes to the proposed conditions: o Condition of Approval No.14 -- add language or as amended by these conditions; Condition of Approval No. 19 - amended to read the applicant shall apply for and receive approval of Model Home Complex permit; o That the added Development Impact Fee (DIF) categories as single-family residential conditions of approval. For Commissioner Guerriero, Associate Planner Long relayed that the architectural features will meet the intent of the Specific Plan and Design Guidelines for the Monterey architectural style. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Long noted that of the four floor proposed plans, staff required one roofline of each plan to have some variation from the others. Commissioner Olhasso relayed that the Craftsman and the Ranch style homes were disappointing compared to the Design Guidelines and, therefore, was of the opinion that this proposed project is not where it should be at this time. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Jim Teergarden, 110 N. Lincoln Street, of Griffin Communities, relayed that many months and man hours have been devoted to this project and that the applicant has made every change requested by staff. Mr. Charles Addington, 17992 Mitchell South, representing KTGY Group Architecture and Planning, relayed the following: o That the floor plans have a different silhouette; that the silhouettes of Plan No. one is different from Plan No. two which create a variation from the street. Advising that she could no approve the proposed project at this time, Commissioner Olhasso relayed that she would be willing to work through some suggestions with the Commission if the applicant were willing to spend the time. Echoing Commissioner Olhasso's comments, Commissioner Guerriero expressed confusion with regard to the Monterey style home presentation viewing it as a California stucco box. R:'WlinutesPC~2003\l 11903 5 In response, Mr. Addington stated that the proposed Monterey style would be historically accurate and that this particular style does not have a lot of arched elements; that the proposed style would be more accurate then the depiction in the City's Guidelines. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Addington noted that for the Mediterranean style, a Spanish Colonial theme style was chosen; that this style has a lot of amhed elements, arched colonnades, rounded windows, shaped shutters, barrel tile roof, and wrought iron grill details which would be consistent with the Spanish Colonial. Commissioner Mathewson noted that from his view, there are only two architectural styles. Mr. Addington stated that the proposed project depicts four distinct styles as defined by the Specific Plan; that only three styles were required; but that a fourth style was added for variety. Commissioner Olhasso noted that neither the Craftsman style nor the Ranch style on Plan No. one would be acceptable. Relaying his disappointment with the Commission's comments, Mr. Teegarden advised the applicant and his representatives have made every concession requested and was of the opinion that this project would be acceptable to the Commission. Mr. Addington echoed that the applicant was of the opinion to have met the objectives of staff with this project. In light of the confusion with regard to the styles, Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern with the direction given to the applicant. Commissioner Mathewson relayed that there are significant differences between the design guidelines and what was presented. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested that other examples of a Monterey style homes be presented to the Commission. In the interest of being specific for the architect, Commissioner Olhasso suggested working on the garage doors and that the Plan three homes need a new shape. Commissioner Telesio expressed concern with the wrap-around of the homes and is of the opinion that there needs to be more specific detail on the other three sides of the homes. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested forming a sub-committee. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Kevin Everett, representing Ashby USA, stated that the applicant has worked with staff for several months and the concerns of the Commission must be resolved this evening. Mr. Rob Rodine, 110 Lincoln Avenue, representing Griffin Communities stated that he is concerned with the Commission's comments noting that the architects have spent a tremendous amount of time working to stay within the guidelines; that this product is for the consumer and that they have spent thousands of dollars on focus studies and research with regard to what the consumer's needs are. R:',MinutesPC'~2003\l 11903 6 Commissioner Mathewson noted that it is the Commission's duty to ensure that the design guidelines that were adopted for this type of project are being followed. Mr. Tom McAliester, 39430 Liefer Road, noted that the run-of onto his property from the developers is a problem. For Mr. McAliester, Chairman Chiniaeff noted that he contact the Engineering Department. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Chiniaeff stated that he agrees with the comments on both sides and is of the opinion that a sub-committee would be helpful. Director of Planning Ubnoske concurs with Chairman Chiniaeff in forming a sub-committee for the proposed item. Commissioner Mathewson and Commissioner Olhasso volunteered to be on the sub-committee. MOTION: Commissioner OIhasso moved to continue this item for another month. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 6 Planninq Application No. PA02-0522 an Amendment of the Temecula Reqional Center Specific Plan to establish requlations qoverninq temporary uses in parkinR lots of the Promenade Mall (40820 Winchester Road) located at the Promenade Mall RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A TEXT AMENDMENT OF THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDING SECTION III.C.1 TO ESTABLISH TEMPORARY USE REGULATIONS FOR THE LAND AREA ENCOMPASSED BY THE PROMENADE MALL AND SURROUNDING PARKING LOTS INTERIOR OF THE LOOP ROAD LOCATED AT 40820 WINCHESTER ROAD Director of Planning Ubnoske presented a brief staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: · That the proposed Specific Plan amendment will permit Car auto shows and sales, RV shows and sales, and Water craft and Boat shows and sales; That the current Development Code allows on a particular piece of property, no more than two of these events a year; that within this Regional Center Specific Plan, the language has been changed to allow up to 12 events, with the provision that there will not be more than two a month; R:~VlinutesPC~003~l 11903 7 · That staff worked with Mr. Doblado, auto dealers, and Council members noting that these events would be ideal for the City of Temecula; · That the proposed project will be exempt from environmental review. Mr. Doblado, 47820 Winchester Road, General Manager of the Promenade Mall, noted the following: · That his first commitment would be to the tenants of the mall, ensuring sufficient parking; · That the tenants expect to have a vibrant shopping center, providing an entertainment venue; · That by approving the proposed Specific Plan (SP) amendment, this would generate a positive venue that would continue to encourage customers visiting the mall; · That thus far, past car shows have been successful (Red Robin between Sears and Edwards theater). For Commissioner Olhasso, Mr. Doblado noted that the site for the proposed amendment would depend on the type of event. For Chairman Chiniaeff, Mr. Doblado relayed that his major focus is to work within the local communities; that the business base of Temecula would be those addressed first; that these businesses will have the first right of refusal as to participation. For Commissioner Telesio, Mr. Doblado noted that the majority of the participants would be City businesses. Commissioner Telesio remarked that he would prefer to see a balance between profit and non- profit events. In response to Commissioner Mathewson's concern with the duration of the events, Mr. Doblado relayed his understanding of the Commission's concerns but stated that his responsibility would be to ensure the success of the tenants and, therefore, would not propose a project that would jeopardize the sales of his tenants. Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that all proposed events would still need to obtain a temporary use permit from the City; that the Public Works Department will be viewing traffic circulation, the Planning Department will be viewing parking spaces, and that the City will have an opportunity to condition and provide input on upcoming events. For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Doblado reiterated that the interest of his tenants would be his first priority. For Commissioner Mathewson, Ms. Ubnoske noted that staff will be viewing where these proposed events could be held and that there could be a possibility that future events could be moved away from the entertainment area. R:~,lin ute s PC'~?-003\111903 8 For Chairman Chiniaeff, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the Specific Plan (SP) language can be written to reflect the number and duration of events and that this could be incrementally increased by the Director of Planning. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve for profits events be limited to a total of six, of which two could have a period of 14 days and the other four would be limited to a maximum of seven days which would be for profit only. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Director of Planning Ubnoske requested that the applicant readdress the matter to have the mall come back in a year or two in order to expand the number of events if it were the will of the Commission. Item No. 7 was moved off calendar per the request of Planning Director Ubnoske. 7 Planning Application No. PA02-0371 and PA02-0372 Chanqe of Zone from Low Density Residential (L-l, One-acre minimum lot size) to Low Density Residential (L-2, One-half acre minimum lot size), and Tentative Tract Map to subdivide a 4.57 acre site into seven sinqle family residential lots ranqin.q from .5 acres to .82 acres, located on the east side of Ynez Road, approximately 470 feet north of Santiaqo Road (APN 945-060-006) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION PA02-0372, A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L-l) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L-2), AND PLANNING APPLICATION PA02-0371, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30169 SUBDIVIDING A 4.57 ACRE PARCEL INTO SEVEN (7) RESIDENTIAL LOTS RANGING BETWEEN .5 AND .8 ACRES IN NET LOT AREA, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, OPPOSITE QUIET MEADOWS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 473 LINEAR FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SANTIAGO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 945-060-006 COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern with signage on Winchester Road and that the theater sign at the Promenade Mall is in need of repairs. For Chairman Chiniaeff, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the Black Angus is in violation of the conditions of approval with regard to the water fountain and that Code Enforcement will be investigating the issue. R:~VlinutesPC~2003\l 11903 9 Commissioner Telesio commented on the City Council's meeting of November 18, 2003, requesting a copy of the presentation with regard to Mello Roos and bonding processes. For Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the Code Enforcement reports are currently pending. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed her understanding of the Commission's frustration with regard to the product review submitted by Griffin Communities. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested using a consulting amhitect to assist in projects of this nature. In response to Director of Planning Ubnoske, Chairman Chiniaeff and Commissioner Guerriero volunteered the serve on the campus project sub-committee. ADJOURNMENT At 8:20 p.m., Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next regular meetinR to be held on Wednesday, December 3, 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Dennis W. Chiniaeff Chairman Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R%MinutesPC~2003\l 11903 1 0 ITEM #3 CITY OFTEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commi~,~.,~ Debbie Ubnoske,~Birector of Planning December 17, 2003 Promenade Medical, Wall Mounted Signs BACKGROUND On June 18, 2002, staff approved a Sign Program for the Promenade Medical buildings located on the southeast corner of the Margarita and North General Kearny Road (Attachment 1). These office buildings are within a commercial zoning district; however, the Development Code requires application of office zoning district standards for office buildings in commercial zoning districts. This sign program provided standards for three types of signs including entry monumentation, building identification, and tenant identification signs. PROPOSAL The applicant is requesting to amend the Sign Program to allow the placement of four tenant identification signs on the second story wall sudace, below the eaves for two different tenants (Attachment 2). Two signs are proposed along the Margarita Road frontage and two other signs are proposed along the parking lot frontage (Attachment 3 and 4). In addition, the applicant is proposing to amend the Sign Program to delete the Building Identification signs on the two towers and is proposing to add a second sign type for parking lot frontage tenant identification signs. Usually, the Director would approve this type of proposal; however, the Director has made the decision to request the Planning Commission to make the final determination, EXISTING CONDITIONS Buildinq Identification Si,qns The approved Sign Program allows three building identification signs. One sign is already built along the parking lot on the amhway that connects the two buildings on the corner of Margarita and North General Kearney Road. Two additional building identification signs were approved but not installed on the towers for the 2 story building on the elevation facing Margarita Road. R:~Signs~002~02-O095 Margarita Medical Sign Program~/lemo F-l.doc Tenant Identification Signs The approved Sign Program includes different standards for signs facing the street and signs facing the parking lot. The signs facing a street can have a maximum letter height of 14" and an area not to exceed one square feet for every one lineal foot of building frontage. The signs facing the parking lot can have a maximum letter height of 8" and an area not to exceed 5% of the surface area of the building. The Sign Program further states that all tenant identification signs need to be coordinated to be identical in color, style, size, illumination, and font. Neither the text nor the exhibits of the approved Sign Program make references to second story signs. Currently, tenant identification signs are only installed for the first story tenants. ANALYSIS The Development Code permits approval of a Sign Program for a project, if the Sign Program complies with all the regulations of the Development Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and height. However, the Development Code also requires that to the extent the Sign Program standards differ from the Development Code, the Sign Program also should propose to enhance the development to more fully accomplish the objectives of the Sign standards in the Development Code. The Development Code only permits tenant identification signs for office buildings if the main entrance to each suite is from the exterior of the building as opposed to a lobby or courtyard design. This section of the Development Code is not very clear, however, staff is interpreting that the Development Code does not permit signage on the second story office buildings since second story suites cannot obviously have access from the exterior of the building. Since the approved Sign Program did not specifically permit second story signs, staff is not supporting adding second story signs through an amended Sign Program. If the commission desires to add second story signs through an amendment to the Sign Program, staff would recommend a completely different approach to the signage for the entire 2-story building. The Development Code allows additional signage over what is allowed by the Development Code through approval of a Sign Program. The Development Code also requires that if this additional signage is allowed through the approval of Sign Program, the signs should enhance the development. In staff's opinion, in order to enhance the existing building while adding new signage to the second story is to remove the three existing first story signage. Instead, the first and second story signs should be non-illuminated and smaller signs similar to those existing along the parking lot frontage. Otherwise, the second story signs proposed as part of in this amendment will cause a clutter of signage on the building elevations. This clutter is clearly not the intent of the Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending the Planning Commission: 1. Approve the two signs along the parking lot frontage; Deny the two signs along the Margarita Frontage as they do not meet the standards and the intent of Sign Program specified in the Development Code and aesthetically are enhancing the architecture of the building; 3. Approve first and second story signs similar to the signs along the parking lot frontage and remove the three existing first story signs on the 2-story building; R:~Slgns~002~02-0095 Mai'garita Medical Sign Program~Vlemo F-l.doc Approve adding a second sign type for the tenant identification signs for the elevations along the parking lot and deleting the two tower Building identification signs. Staff further recommends that the Planning Commission direct staff to finalize the Sign Program to be consistent with the Planning Commission's final recommendations; and Direct staff to approve a Sign Program consistent with the Planning Commissions direction on the above. Attachments: 1. Approved Sign Program - Blue Page 4 2. Proposed Sign Program - Blue Page 5 3. Proposed Signs- Blue Page 6 4. Area Calculations for the Proposed Signs - Blue Page 7 R:~Signs~2002~02-O095 Margarita Medical Sign Program~Memo F-l.doc ATTACHMENT 1 APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM R:~Slgns~O02~02-O095 Margarita Medical Sign Program~Memo F-l.doc PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA SIGN PROGRAM Submitted by: Margarita Medical Condo Development, LLC Owner APPROV O SUBJECT TO BUiLDiNG DEPT. APPROVAL CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING 0EPT. PROJECT MEETS ZONING STANDARDS PERMITS ARE REQUIRED SIGN PROGRAM FOR PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA (1) ENTRY MONUMENTATION "PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA" shall be constructed of individual dimensional formed plastic letters with a beveled face and shall be 6" in height; the site address of"41238 MARGARITA RD" shall be the same style letters of 4" height. Fora shall be "architectural". The monument shall be illuminated by three ground lights shining on the monument. Individual tenant names shall n0! be phced on the monument. Please see Exifibit "A". (2) BUILDING IDENTIFICATION ''PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA" shall be attached to the parking lot side archway that connects building "A" and building "B" and shall be constructed of individual dimensional formed plastic letters with a beveled face and shali be 10' in height. Please see Exhibit "B'. (3) TENANT iDENTIFICATION (a) The surface area of tenant iden 'tflication signage shall not exceed one square foot for every one lineal foot of building fl:ontage which directly faces the street. Maximum letter height shall not exceed fourteen inches (14") unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. (b) The surface area ofthe tenant identification signage shall not exeeed4ive- }--~ J ~rcz,,, ~,,,,~ of the surface area ofthe parking lot side of the building. Maximum letter height shall not exceed eight inches (8") unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. (c) All tenant on-site fascia signage shall be coordinated to be identical in color, style, size, illumination and font. (d) The lettering for tenant signage shall conform to the following specifications: (1) Letters shall be 14"/8" (where applicable) in height; 5" returns ~ainted to match X- 17 Misty La Habra stucco color. (2) Faces to be 3/16' PlexigLass with 3/4", Day/Night acrylic Black trim cap. Interior illumination by neon robing using U.L. approved protective housing throughout or using "Electro-bits" U.L. approved insulators, internal clear Red neon. (3) Installation: mounted to a nine inch (9") high, five inch (5") wide wireway that ruus the length of the letters. The bottom oftbe letters shall extend down to the bottom of the architectural foam trim element that is a part of the building feature. A remote transformer will be installed behind the wall Please see Exlu'bits "C', "D" and (e) Tenant Window Identificatior~ Store identity, graphics, typography and/or company logo may be silkscreened or etched on the tenant's window.' The maximum square foot graphic area allowed per window shall not exceed four (4) square feet; provided, however, that in-store neon type signage shall not exceed eight (8) square feet in size. (f) Hanging Signs. Hanging signs shall not be allowed. (g) Banners and Pennants. Banners shall not be permitted except as a temporary substitute of permanent signage, not to exceed 90 days, subject to City approval Pennants are not allowed. Criteria for the temporary signage shall not exceed the criteria for permanent signage. (4) GENERAL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS (a) AH buildin4g-mounted signs shall meet or exceed all applicable city, state and federal codes. Co) AH sign.q containing electrical components shall conform to the Uniform Lighting Code. · (c) No on-site Sign shall'be affixed on, above or over the roof of any building, and no on-site sign shall be affixed to the wall of a building so that it projects above the parapet of the building. For the Purposes of this section, a mansard style roof shall be considered a parapet. · · Ill AI-I'ACHMENT 2 PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM R:~Slgns~2002~02-0095 Margarita Medical Sign Program~lemo F-l.doc PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA SIGN PROGRAM Submitted by: Margarita Medical Condo Development, LLC and Promenade Medical Condo Development, LLC Owners SIGN PROGRAM FOR PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA (1) ENTRY MONLIMENTATION "PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA" shall be constructed of individual dimensional formed plastic letters with a beveled face and shall be 6" in height; the site address of"41238 MARGARITA RD" shall be the same style letters of 4" height. Font shall be "architectural". The monument shall be illuminated by three ground lights shining On the monument. Individual tenant names shall not be placed on the monument. Please see Exhibit "A". (2) BUILDING IDENTIFICATION "PROMENADE MEDICAL PLAZA" shall be attached to the parking lot side archway that connects building "A" and building "B" and shall be constructed of individual dimensional formed plastic letters with a beveled face and shall be 10" in height. Please see Exhibit "B". (3) TENANT IDENTIFICATION The surface area of tenant identification signage shall not exceed one square foot for every one lineal foot of building frontage which directly faces the street. Maximum letter height shall not exceed fourteen inches (14") unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. Co) The surface area of the tenant identification signage shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the surface area of the parking lot side of the building. Maximum letter height shall not exceed eight inches (8") unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. (c) All tenant on-site Margarita strcet side fascia signage shall be coordinated to be identical in color, style, size, illumination and font, and all parking lot fascia signage shall be identical in color, style, size, non-illumination and font. (d) . The lettering for tenant Margarita street side signage shall conform to the following specifications: (1) Letters shall be 14" in height; 5" returns painted to match X-17 Misty La Habra stucco color. (2) Faces to be 3/16' Plexiglas with %", Day/Night acrylic Black trim cap. Interior illumination by neon tubing using (e) (f) (g) (h) (4) U.L. approved protective housing throughout or using "Electro-bits" U.L. approved insulators, internal clear Red neon. (3) Installation: mounted to a nine inch (9") high, five inch (5") wide wireway that nms the length of the letters. The bottom of the letters shall extend down to the bottom of the · architectural foam trim element that is a part of the building feature. A remote transformer will be installed behind the wall. Please see Exhibits "C", "D" and "E". The letter for tenant parking lot side signage shall be 8" in height, individual dimensional formed plastic letters with a beveled face, black, with an "architectural" font. Tenant Window Identification. Store identity, graphics, typography and/or company logo may be silk-screened or etched on the tenant's window. The maximum square foot graphic area allowed per window shall not exceed four (4) square feet; provided, however, that in-store neon type signage shall not exceed with (8) square feet in size. Hanging Signs. Hanging signs shall not be allowed. Banners and Pennants. Banners shall not be permitted except as a temporary substitute of permanent signage, not to exceed 90 days, subject to City approval. Pennants are not' allowed. Criteria for the temporary signage shall not exceed the criteria for permanent signage. GENERAL SIGN SPECIFICATIONS (a) 'All building-mounted signs shall meet or 6xceed all applicable city, state and federal codes. (b) All si~tma containing electrical components shall conform to the Uniform Lighting Code. (c) No on-site sign shall be affixed on, above or over the roof of any building and no on-site sign shall be affixed to the wall ora building so that it projects above the parapet of the building. For the purposes of this section, a mansard style roof shall be considered a parapet. ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED SIGNS R:~Slgns~2002~02-0095 Margarita Medical Sign program~lemo F-l.doc AI-I'ACHMENT 4 AREA CALULATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED SIGNS R:~Slgns~002~02-0095 Margarita Medical Sign Program~lemo F-l.doc Proposed Signs Square Footage Lineal Feet of Square foot of Square footage of the Sign the Building Signage of the Signage Frontage Permitted by permitted by the Sign the Program Development Code Endodontics (Street 9.67 21' 11" 22 11 Fronta~le) Endodontics (Parking Lot 3 28' 4" 15 14 Frontage) Advanced Orthopedic Surgery Center 26.29 36' 36 18 (Street Fronta~le) Advanced Orthopedic Surgery Center 8.9 40' 9" 22 20 (Street Frontage) R:~SIgns~002~02-0095 Margarita Medical Sign Program~/lemo F-1 .doc ITEM #4 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Planning Commissioners Dan Long, Associate Planner~]/_..-~ December 17, 2003 PA03-0347, Product Review Roripaugh Ranch, Griffin Communities On November 19, 2003, the Planning Commission continued the above-mentioned project for 30- days and created a sub-committee to work with the applicant and staff to enhance the architecture. The sub-committee met with the applicant and staff on December 3, 2003 and has provided direction for the proposed project. As of December 10, 2003, staff has not received any revised plans from the applicant. The applicant intends to resubmit plans within the next week and staff anticipates that this project will be re-noticed for the first Planning Commission hearing of the year on January 7, 2004. R:~longd~memos~Vlemo to PC.doc ITEM #5 ClTY OFTEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commissioners Sheila M. Powers, Associate Plann~ December 17, 2003 Items continued from December 3, 2003 Planning Commission Hearing (PA03- 0432-Sarasota; PA03-0433-Chatham; PA03-0435-St. Augustine; PA03-0436- Auburn Ln.) The Planning Commission hearing for each of the items below was continued to the December 17, 2003 hearing. Staff has review the revised plans as requested by the Planning Commission and has determined that revised plans have addressed the concerns of the Planning Commission, with the exception of PA03-0433 (Chatham). Therefore, resolutions of approval and one resolution of denial have been attached for your consideration. The staff report packet from the previous meeting is also attached for your reference. PA03-0432 (Sarasota): This product review has been found to be consistent with the guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan and has addressed all concerns raised by the Planning Commission on December 3, 2003. The following pages represent the changes. PLAN ONE 1.0 - Floor Plan - Standard - Spanish Eclectic: Entry porch changed as Spanish tower element was added 1.1 - Elevations - Standard - Spanish Eclectic: Spanish tower element added with wrought iron detail above entry 1.2 - Floor Plan - Enhanced - Spanish Eclectic: Entry porch changed as Spanish tower element was added 1.3 - Elevations - Enhanced - Spanish Eclectic: Spanish tower element added with wrought iron detail above entry 1.5 - Elevations - Standard - Cottage: Switched design elements on front two gables in order to enlarge the detail at the second gable 1.7 - Elevations - Enhanced - Cottage: Switched design elements on front two gables in order to enlarge the detail at the second gable 1.8 - Floor Plan - Standard - Craftsman: Revised porch to project in front of bedroom 2. 1.9 - Elevations - Standard - Craftsman: Revised porch and gable details, window at bdrm 2, added shed dormer and changed shingle siding to hardy board siding only. 1.10 - Floor Plan ~ Enhanced - Craftsman: Revised porch to project in front of bedroom 2 R:\O P~2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Report~COA\PC cont memo 12 17 2003.doc 1 1.11 - Elevations - Enhanced - Craftsman: Revised porch and gable details, window at bdrm, added shed dormer and changed shingle siding to siding only. PLAN TWO 2.0 - Floor Plan - Standard - Spanish Eclectic: Revised entry to court and bonus room layout 2.1 - Elevations - Standard - Spanish Eclectic: Revised entry to court and bonus room layout 2.2 - Floor Plan - Enhanced - Spanish Eclectic: Revised entry to court and bonus room layout 2.3 - Elevations - Enhanced - Spanish Eclectic: Revised entry to court and bonus room layout 2.4 - Floor Plan - Standard - Cottage: - Revised entry to court and bonus mom layout 2.5 - Elevations - Standard - Cottage: Revised gable design elements at entry to court and at gable above entry door 2.6 - Floor Plan - Enhanced - Cottage: Revised entry to court and bonus room layout 2.7 - Elevations - Enhanced - Cottage: Revised gable design elements at entry to court and rear elev and at gable above entry door 2.8 - Floor Plan - Standard - Craftsman: Revised entry with porch and revised bonus room layout 2.9 - Elevations - Standard - Craftsman: Added porch and recommended details, siding only (not shingle siding), gable beam details, and design window icon at master bedroom 2.10 - Floor Plan - Enhanced - Craftsman: Revised entry to court and bonus room layout 2.11 - Elevations - Enhanced - Craftsman: Added porch and recommended details, siding only (not shingle siding) and gable beam details, and design window icon at master bedroom. PLAN THREE 3.0 - Floor Plan - Standard - Spanish Eclectic: Revised windows at first and second floor per elevation 3.1 - Elevations - Standard - Spanish Eclectic: Added round windows, wrought iron detail revised entry door recess and added sidelights. 3.2 - Floor Plan - Enhanced - Spanish Eclectic: Revised windows at first and second floor per elevation 3.3 - Elevations - Enhanced - Spanish Eclectic: Added round windows, wrought iron detail revised entry door recess and added sidelights. 3.4 - Floor Plan - Standard - Cottage: Revised entry recess 3.5 - Elevations - Standard - Cottage: Revised entry with sidelights and stone below 3.6 - Floor Plan - Enhanced - Cottage: Revised windows at first and second floor per elevation 3.7 - Elevations - Enhanced - Cottage: Revised entry with sidelights and stone below 3.8 - Floor Plan - Standard - Craftsman: Revised windows at first and second floor per elevation R:\D P~2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA\PC cont memo 12 17 2003.doc 2 3.9 - Elevations - Standard - Craftsman: Revised porch with recommended details, added style icon windows above, and revised shingle siding to hardy board siding only. 3.10 - Floor Plan - Enhanced - Craftsman: Revised windows at first and second floor per elevation 3.11 - Elevations - Enhanced - Craftsman: Revised porch with recommended details, added style icon windows above, and revised shingle siding to siding only and added additional siding to the left and right elevations.. PA03-0433 (Chatham): Only one change has been made to satisfy the Planning Commission's comments on December 3, 2003. The applicant chose not to make the other revisions as requested. Plan 2 - Cottage: the front elevation has been re-worked to have the entr~vay include a swooping roof and a curve in the wall to the right side of the pop out. **% Plan 1 American Farmhouse and Colonial: siding was to wrap around to both sides of the residence on the standard and enhanced plans. *:o Plan 1 Spanish Colonial: Staff had spoke to the applicant verbally requesting that the wrought iron bars be removed from the front elevation as it gives a negative appearance and to use a different decorative approach. The applicant is choosing to keep the wrought iron. Plan 2 Colonial: siding was to wrap around to both sides of the residence on the standard and enhanced plans. Plan 3 East Coast Traditional: siding was to wrap around to both sides of the residence on the standard and enhanced plans, that additional siding will not look appropriate for these particular The architect feels architectural styles. PA03-0435 (St. Au,qustine): This product review has been found to be consistent with the guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan and has addressed all concerns raised by the Planning Commission on December 3, 2003. Plan 1 - A-C: enhanced elevations added closed shutters to rear of tandem garage. · Plan 2 - A: Added soft arches to the two recessed front windows. B: Added pot-shelf below first floor front window Plan 3 - A: added full arch to the front center window over garage B: revised garage door pattern C: added additional shingle siding and returned down side elevation of living room on both standard and enhanced side. R:\D P~2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report-COA\PC cont memo 12 17 2003.doc 3 PA03-0436 (Auburn Lane): This product review has been found to be consistent with the guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan and has addressed all concerns raised by the Planning Commission on December 3, 2003. Plan 1 - Spanish Colonial: Enhanced wrought iron pot holder located below second story window; rectangular windows above single story edge (left side) revised to arched windows. Cottage: revised sloping roof above garage to become a "swooping" or curved roof. Plan 2 - Spanish Colonial: Enhanced wrought iron pot holder located below second story window; small rectangular windows above garage revised to arched windows. Cottage: added stone wainscot base at single-story entry mass. Plan 3 - Spanish Colonial: Enhanced wrought iron pot holder located below second story window. Craftsman: added shed roof supported by knickers above three-window pattern at second story; added 8" lap siding at three window mass (this siding wraps around the right elevation and also continues below on first floor behind porch). ATrACHMENTS 1. PA03-0432 - PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 2. PA03-0433 - PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 6 3. PA03-0435 - PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 4. PA03-0436 - PC Resolution No. 2003- - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval December 3, 2003 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 9 R:\D P~2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Repor[~COA\PC cent memo 12 17 2003. doc 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PA03-0432 - PC RESOLUTION 2003- R:~) P~003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA\PC cont memo 12 17 2003.doc 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0432 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 109-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (SARASOTA, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 2). WHEREAS, Lennar Homes filed Planning Application No. PA03-0432 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as proscribed by law, at which time the Planning Commission continued the item to December 17, 2003; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 17, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findin.qs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Harveston Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Medium land use designation contained in the R:\D P~2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report-COA\PC Resolution.DOC 1 General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the sing/e-family residences, including the site, building, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and we/fare. C. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. The overall design of the single-family residences are consistent with the design guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan Sections 10.0 through 11.0. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves the application (PA 03-0432) a product review of a 109-1ot single-family residential subdivision (Sarasota, Phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2) for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of December 2003. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R:~D P~2003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report-COA\PC Resolution.DOC 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of December 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~D P~003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA\PC Resolution. DOC 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~D P~003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA\PC Resolution.DOC 4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0432 (Development Plan) Project Description: A request for Product Review and approval of three model types and associated elevations within the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2 to be constructed on 109 lots within Tracts 30668, 30668-1, & 30669-1 (Lennar Homes) DIF: Per Development Agreement Approval Date: December 17, 2003 Expiration Date: December 17, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its R:~D P~2003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Report-COA\PC Resolution. DOC 5 officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Within 45 days from the approval date by the Planning Commission, the applicant shall provide a site plan, floor plans, and elevations for corner lots that position the entry on the street and the garage on the other street. This is consistent with Section 10.5.3 (Comer Plotting) of the Harveston Specific Plan. This condition has been added by the Planning Commission. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. 10. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. 11, Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 12. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. R:\D P~2.003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Revlew~Staff Report~COA~PC Resolution. DOC 6 13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 14. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 15. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, conditions of approval for PA00- 0295 (Tract 29639), the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Harveston Specific Plan. 16. The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. 17. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Attachment 1, or as amended by any other related conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identity the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of building permits: a. Myoporum pacificum shall be deleted from the plant legend of the landscape plans. 18. Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. 19. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. 20. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that all homes will have double paned windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. 21. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. 22. All design components shall comply with applicable previsions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 23. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. R:~D P~003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff RepoH~COA\PC Resolution,DOC 7 24. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector pdor to commencement of any construction or inspections. 25. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. 26. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. 27. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. 28. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. 29. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 30. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 31. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. 32. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 33. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 34. The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. 35. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. R:~D P~003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Report~COA~PC Resolution. DOC 8 By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date R:\D P~2003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Report~COA\PC Resolution. DOC 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PA03-0433 - PC RESOLUTION 2003- R:~D P~003\03-O432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA~PC cont memo 12 17 2003.doc 6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03- 0433 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 78-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (CHATHAM, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 1). WHEREAS, Lenner Homes filed Planning Application No. PA03-0433 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time end manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the Planning Commission continued the item to December 17, 2003; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 17, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headngs and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in denying the Application, hereby recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single family homes are not consistent with the General Plan and the HarvestonSpecificPlan. Theproposalcontainsarchitecturalstylesthatarenotfoundtobe consistent with the guidelines as set forth within the Harveston Specific Plan. R:\D P~2003\03-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA\PC Resolution~COA,DOC B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the single-family residences, including the site, building, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. The overall design of the single-family residences is not consistent with the design guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan Sections 10.0 through 11.0. The architectural styles represented have not been designed to be consistent with the overall intent of the Harveston Specific Plan. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CECA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Projects that are denied do not require a finding of consistency of CECA. Section 4. Conditions: The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula denies the application (PA 03-0433) a product review of a 78-1ot single-family residential subdivision (Chatham, Phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 1 ) for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of December 2003. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R:',D P~O03~3~0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA\PC Resolution-OOA.DOC 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted b~V the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17"' day of December, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P~2003\03-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PA03-0435 - PC RESOLUTION 2003- R:~D P~003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report-COA\PC cont memo 12 17 2003.doc 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0435 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 93-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (ST. AUGUSTINE, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 1) WHEREAS, Lennar Homes filed Planning Application No. PA03-0435 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the Planning Commission continued the item to December 17, 2003; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 17, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headngs and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Harveston Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. TheprojectisalsoconsistentwiththeMediumlandusedesignationcontainedinthe R:',D P~2003~03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review~Staff Rpts-COA's'~PC Resolution~COA.DOC 1 General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the single-family residences, including the site, building, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. The overall design of the single-family residences are consistent with the design guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan Sections 10.0 through 11.0. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EI R's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves the application (PA 03-0435) a product review of a 93-1ot single-family residential subdivision (St. Augustine, Phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 1 ) for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of December 2003. A'i-FEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R:~D P~.003V33-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Produc~ RevieW\Staff Rpts~COA's\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted b~/~the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17u' day of December 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P~003\03-0435 Harveston St, Augustine Product Review~Staff Rpts~COA's\PC Resolution-COA.DOC 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:'~D P~003\03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review~Staff Rpts~COA's'~PC Resolution~COA.DOC 4 Project Description: DIF: Approval Date: Expiration Date: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0435 (Development Plan) A request for Product Review and approval of three model types and associated elevations within the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area I to be constructed on 93 lots within Tracts 30667-1, & 30667-3 (Lennar Homes) Per Development Agreement December 17, 2003 December 17, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its R:~D P~003~03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review\Staff Rpts-COA's\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 5 officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Within 45 days from the approval date by the Planning Commission, the applicant shall provide a site plan, floor plans, and elevations for corner lots that position the entry on the street and the garage on the other street. This is consistent with Section 10.5.3 (Corner Plotting) of the Harveston Specific Plan. This condition has been added by the Planning Commission. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. 10. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. 11. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 12. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. R:~D P~2003\03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review\Staff Rpts~COA's\PC ResoJution~COA. DOC 6 13. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 14. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 15. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and conditions of approval for PA00-0295 (Tract 29639), the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Harveston Specific Plan. 16. The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. 17. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Attachment 1, or as amended by any other related conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identitythe total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of building permits: a. Myoporum paoificum shall be deleted from the plant legend. b, The spacing of the Gazania shall be revised to 12" on center. 18. Chimney caps are to represent the architectural style accurately. Staff is to review and approve chimney caps prior to the issuance of building permits. 19. All railings shall be made of quality grade wrought iron. No wood shall be utilized. 20. Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. 21. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. 22. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that all homes will have double parted windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. 23. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. R:',D P~003~03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review\Staff Rpts~COA's\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 7 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Prior to 32. 33. 34. 35. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the Califomia Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. A pro-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays the Issuance of Occupancy Permits All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). R:~D P~.003'~03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review~Staff Rpts~COA's~PC Resolution~COA. DOC 8 36. The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. 37. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have road, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date R:~D P~003~D3-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review~Staff Rpts~COA's~PC Resolution~COA. DOC 9 ATTACHMENT NO 4 PA03-0436 - PC RESOLUTION 2003- R:~D P~2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA~PC cont memo 12 17 2003.doc 8 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0436 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 119-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (AUBURN LN. PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 2). WHEREAS, Lennar Homes filed Planning Application No. PA03-0436 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the Planning Commission continued the item to December 17, 2003; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 17, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findin,qs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Harveston Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Medium land use designation contained in the R:~D P~2003\03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA's\PC Resolution-COA.DOC General Plan. The site is propedy planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the single-family residences, including the site, building, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. The overall design of the single-family residences is consistent with the design guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan Sections 10.0 through 11.0. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves the application (PA 03-0436) a product review of a 119-lot single-family residential subdivision (Auburn Ln., Phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2) for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning · th Commission th~s 17 day of December 2003· ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R:~,D P~003~D3-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA's\PC Resolution-COA.DOC 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of December 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:'~D P~2003~03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA's'~PC Resolution~COA. DOC 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:~D P~003\03-0436 Harveston Aubum Lane Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA's~PC Resolution~COA. DOC 4 Project Description: DIF: Approval Date: Expiration Date: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0436 (Development Plan) A request for Product Review and approval of three model types and associated elevations within the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2 to be constructed on 119 lots within Tract 30668-2 &30669-2 (Lennar Homes) Per Development Agreement December 17, 2003 December 17, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnity, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resoumes Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notity or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnity, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its R:~D P~2003\03-0436 Harveston Aubum Lane Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA's\PC Resolution~COA. DOC 5 10. 11. 12. officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Within 45 days from the approval date by the Planning Commission, the applicant shall provide a site plan, floor plans, and elevations for corner lots that position the entry on the street and the garage on the other street. This is consistent with Section 10.5.3 (Corner Plotting) of the Harveston Specific Plan. This condition has been added by the Planning Commission. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. Attic vents are not being provided on the Craftsman style homes (Plans 1 through 3). Attic vents need to be incorporated into this architectural style. R:~) P~003~03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA's\PC Resolufion~COA. DOC 6 Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 13. 14. 15. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and conditions of approval for PA00-0295 (Tract 29639), the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Harveston Specific Plan. The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Attachment 1, or as amended by any other related conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of building permits: a. Myoporum pacificum shall be deleted from the plant legend. b. Street trees on Pasadena Drive shall be coordinated with the street trees at the Lakefront Cottages and Sarasota neighborhoods. c. Street trees shall be coordinated on Edenton way and Logan Courts with the Sarasota neighborhood. Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that all homes will have double parted windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to R:~D P~003\03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane product Review\Staff Rpt-COA's~PC Resolution~COA.DOC 7 lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. 23. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 24. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 25. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. 26. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. 27. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. 28. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. 29. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. 30. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 31. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 32. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. 33. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. R:~D P~2003~03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA's\PC Resolufion-COA,DOC 8 34. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 35. The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. 36. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date R:\D P~003\03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA's\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 DECEMBER 3, 2003 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT R:\D P~003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Rev[ew',Staff Report~COA~PC cont memo 12 17 2003.doc 9 Date of Meeting: STAFF REPORT- PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 3, 2003 Prepared by: Sheila M. Powers Title: Associate Planner File Number PA03-0432, 0433, 0435, 0436 Application Type: Development Plan (Product Review) Project Description: Four product reviews within the Harveston Specific Plan [(Tracts 30668, 30668-1, 30669-1 (Sarasota); 30667, 30667-2 (Chatham); 30667-1, 30667-3 (St. Augustine); 30668-2, & 30669-2 (Auburn Ln.)] generally located south of Harveston Lake, north of LooP Rd. and east of Loop Road. Recommendation: (Check One) [] Approve with Conditions [] Deny [] Continue for Redesign [] Continue to: [] Recommend Approval with Conditions [] Recommend Denial CEQA: CEQA [] Categorically Exempt Section 15162 (Check One) [] Negative Declaration [] Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan [] EIR PROJECT DATA SUMMARY: Applicant: Lennar Homes Completion Date: August 8, 2003 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: December 8, 2003 General Plan Designation: Medium Zoning Designation: SP-13: Sarasota, Chatham, St. Augustine, and Auburn Lane R:~) Px2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA~PC Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Four product reviews within the Harveston Specific Plan [{Tracts 30668, 30668-1, 30669-1 (Sarasota); 30867, 30667-2 (Chatham); 30667- 1, 30667-3 (St. Augustine); 30668-2, & 30669-2 (Auburn Ln.)] North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Vacant BACKGROUND SUMMARY: [] 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. (or) · 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff. PROJECT DESCRIPTION There are four product reviews being proposed: PA 03-0432 (Sarasota), PA 03-0433 (Chatham), PA 03-0435 (St. Augustine), and PA 03-0436 (Auburn Ln.). Following is a description of each product review: SARASOTA: Product review of 109-1ot single-family residential subdivision part of phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2. Consists of three (3) architectural styles for three (3) floor plans. Plan One is 1,890 square foot single story residence. Plan Two is a 2,430 square foot two-story residence. Plan Three is a 2,535 square foot two-story residence. This product review offers Cottage, Craftsman, and Spanish Colonial architectural styles. CHATHAM: Product review of a 78-1ot single-family residential subdivision, phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 1. Consists of five (5) amhitectural styles for three (3) floor plans. Plan One is 2,517 single story residence. Plan Two is a 3,292 square foot two-story residence. Plan Three is a 3,601 two-story residence. This product review offers American Farmhouse, Colonial, Cottage, East Coast Traditional, and Spanish Colonial architectural styles. ST. AUGUSTINE: Product review of a 93-1ot single-family residential subdivision in phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 1. Consists of four (4) architectural styles for three (3) floor plans. Plan One is 2,774 square foot two-story residence. Plan Two is a 3,046 square foot two-story residence. Plan Three is a 3,601 square foot two-story residence. This product review offers American Farmhouse, Cape Cod, Italianate, and R:~D PX2003\03 -0432 Harveston Sarasota Product RevievAStaff Report~COA~PC Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 2 Spanish Colonial architectural styles. AUBURN LANE: Product review of a 119-1ot single-family residential subdivision in phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2. Consists of three (3) architectural styles for three (3) floor plans. Plan One is 1,767 square foot two-story residence. Plan Two is a 1,913 square foot two-story residence. Plan Three is a 2,112 square foot two-story residence. This product review offers Cottage, Craftsman, and Spanish Colonial architectural styles. The application proposes a total of eight (8) amhitectural styles (American Farmhouse, Cape Cod; Colonial, Cottage, Craftsman, East Coast Traditional, Italianate, and Spanish Colonial) and three (3) floor plans. The following table provides a description of each floor plan: PRODUCT REVIEW PLAN STYLE OFFERED PROPOSED DETAILS American Chatham; St. Simple plan form massing & simple roof Farmhouse Augustine design; front to back main gable roof; 12" overhangs; composition shingles; blended siding & stucco; single hung windows at front; simple wood columns w/knee braces at porch; 2x4 wood window & door trim Cape Cod St. Augustine Simple plan form massing w/simple roof design; pomh w/double wood columns; front to back main gable roof; 12" overhangs; smooth flat concrete tiles; blended siding & stucco; vertical multi-paned windows Colonial Chatham Simple plan form massing & simple roof design; front to back dominant gable w/intersecting gable roof; 12" overhangs; flat concrete tiles; blended siding & stucco; vertical multi-parted windows at front elevation; 2x4 wood window & door trim; entry pomh w/simply trimmed wood column; wood shutters; brick veneer at porch Cottage Sarasota; Chatham; Main roof hip w/intersecting gable roof; 6:12 Auburn Ln. roof pitch; 12" overhangs; 2x6 rafter tails; flat concrete tiles; sand finish stucco; recessed shingle hung windows at front; horizontal siding accent at gable end; shutters and wood potshelves Craftsman Sarastoa; Auburn Window accent per style; traditional shutter accent; siding accent at gable end with beam & knee brace; trim accent; column accent; shingle siding accent; stone accent; flat concrete tile with a roof pitch of 4:12; 2x8 fascia w/18" eave& 12" rake; 2x stucco trim; plumb cut rake ends; paneled garage door; R:~D Px2003\03-0432 I-larveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report-COA~X~C Staff Rpt Continu~mce dec 3 2003.dot 3 accent lighting PRODUCT REVIEW PLAN STYLE OFFERED PROPOSED DETAILS East Coast Chatham Plan form massing w/a vertical & horizontal Traditional break; 6:12 roof pitch; composition shingles; 12" to 18" overhangs; blended siding & stucco; multi-paned windows at front elevation; full wood porch & balcony; header window wood accent trim; square column w/trim; wood shutters Italianate St. Augustine 2-story massing w/vertical break at entry; main hip roof w/minor intersecting hip roofs; 4:12 roof pitch; stucco eaves; "S" shaped concrete tiles; vertically hung windows; selected windows paired; arched top accent windows Spanish Eclectic Sarasota; Chatham; St. Recessed theme window; stucco eave accent (Colonial) Augustine; Auburn Ln. at gable end; window accent per style; rustic shutter accent; tile accent at gable end; "S" Iow profile concrete tile roof with 4:12 pitch; 2x8 fascia w/12' eave & 6" rake; 2x stucco trim; plumb cut rake ends; paneled garage door; accent lighting ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the applications and has conditioned them to be consistent with the Design Guidelines of the Harveston Specific Plan. Please refer to Attachment 3, the Design Guidelines, of the Harveston Specific Plan. The design intent and elements proposed by the applicant include architecturally forward residences, a variety of garage placement, eight different architectural styles a variety of roof heights and pitches, pedestrian connections and variable lot setbacks. These elements are consistent with the requirements of the design guidelines in the Harveston Specific Plan architectural styles. Below is a table analyzing each Product Review proposal. PRODUCT ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTERISTICS REVIEW STYLE Sarasota · COTTAGE: Main roof hip w/intersecting gable roof; 6:12 roof pitch; 12" overhangs; 2x6 rafter tails; flat concrete tiles; sand finish stucco; recessed shingle hung windows at front; horizontal siding accent at gable end; shutters and wood potshelves. R:'xD PL2003\03 -0432 Hatveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Report-COA'u~C Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 4 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTERISTICS REVIEW STYLE Sarasota Cottage, · CRAFTSMAN: Window accent per style; Craftsman, traditional shutter accent; siding accent at gable Spanish Colonial end with beam & knee brace; trim accent; column accent; shingle siding accent; stone accent; flat concrete tile with a roof pitch of 4:12; 2x8 fascia w/18" eave & 12" rake; 2x stucco trim; plumb cut rake ends; paneled garage door; accent lighting. Sarasota Staff recommends that the additional architectural features be utilized: less stucco and more siding, columns be more broad at the base, entry porches with heavy square columns or posts on stone piers, basic gable roof side to side or front to back with cross gables, 18"-24" overhangs, and more variation in roof form. · SPANISH COLONIAL: Recessed theme window; stucco eave accent at gable end; window accent per style; rustic shutter accent; tile accent at gable end; "S" Iow profile concrete tile roof with 4:12 pitch; 2x8 fascia w/12" eave & 6" rake; 2x stucco trim; plumb cut rake ends; paneled garage door; accent lighting. Staff recommends that the additional architectural features be utilized: No square windows, windows and garage door entryway to be arched, more use of wrought iron, scones, and/or decorative tiles, more variation in roof form · Applicant should refer to the Phase One approval of Product "D" for more clarification Chatham Cottage, East · COTTAGE: Main roof hip w/intersecting gable Coast Traditional, roof; 6:12 roof pitch; 12" overhangs; 2x6 rafter Spanish Colonial tails; flat concrete tiles; sand finish stucco; recessed shingle hung windows at front; horizontal siding accent at gable end; shutters and wood potshelves. Staff recommends that the additional architectural features be utilized: swooping roof at the front elevation and potshelves. R:XD P~2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product ReviewXStaff Report~COAWC Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 5 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTERISTICS REVIEW STYLE Chatham Cottage, East · EAST COAST TRADITIONAL: Plan form Coast Traditional, massing w/a vertical & horizontal break; 6:12 roof Spanish Colonial pitch; composition shingles; 12" to 18" overhangs; blended siding & stucco; multi-parted windows at front elevation; full wood pomh & balcony; header window wood accent trim; square column w/trim; wood shutters. Staff recommends that the additional amhitectural features be utilized: more variation in roof pitches (6:12 to 12:12), front to back gable or hip roof with intersecting hip or gable roofs, single paned windows at sides and rears, 18'-24'' overhangs as opposed to 12"-18", decorative accent windows, dormers, concrete roof tile with shingle look, and wood shutters. · SPANISH COLONIAL: Recessed theme window; stucco eave accent at gable end; window accent per style; rustic shutter accent; tile accent at gable end; "S" Iow profile concrete tile roof with 4:12 pitch; 2x8 fascia w/12" eave & 6" rake; 2x stucco trim; plumb cut rake ends; paneled garage door; accent lighting. Staff recommends that the additional architectural features be utilized: No square windows, windows and garage door entryway to be arched, more use of wrought iron, scones, and/or decorative tiles, more variation in roof form. Applicant should refer to the Phase One approval of Product "D" for more clarification. St. Augustine American · AMERICAN FARMHOUSE: Simple plan form Farmhouse, Cape massing & simple roof design; 5:12 roof pitch; Cod, Italianate, front to back main gable roof; 12" overhangs; Spanish Colonial composition shingles; blended siding & stucco; single hung windows at front; simple wood columns w/knee braces at porch; 2x4 wood window & door trim. Staff recommends that the additional architectural features be utilized: 6:12 to 9:12 roof pitch, front to back main gable roof, and vertical multi-paned windows at front elevations and in high visibility public view areas. Applicant should refer to the Phase One approval of Product "B" for more clarification. R:~D PX2003~03-0432 Harvestou Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA~2 Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 6 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTERISTICS REVIEW STYLE St. Augustine American · CAPE COD: Simple plan form massing w/simple Farmhouse, Cape roof design; porch w/double wood columns; front Cod, Italianate, to back main gable roof; 12" overhangs; smooth Spanish Colonial flat concrete tiles; blended siding & stucco; vertical multi-paned windows. Staff recommends that the additional architectural features be utilized: 5:12 to 7:12 roof pitch, 12" to 18" roof overhang, single paned windows on sides and rears, additional siding and 2x4 wood window trim surrounds. Applicant should refer to the Phase One approval of Product "F" for more clarification. · ITALIANATE: 2-story massing w/vertical break at entry; main hip roof w/minor intersecting hip roofs; 4:12 roof pitch; stucco eaves; "S" shaped concrete tiles; vertically hung windows; selected windows paired; arched top accent windows. · SPANISH COLONIAL: Recessed theme window; stucco eave accent at gable end; window accent per style; rustic shutter accent; tile accent at gable end; "S" Iow profile concrete tile roof with 4:12 pitch; 2x8 fascia w/12" eave & 6" rake; 2x stucco trim; plumb cut rake ends; paneled garage door; accent lighting. Staff recommends that the additional architectural features be utilized: No square windows, windows and garage door entryway to be arched, more use of wrought iron, scones, and/or decorative tiles, more variation in roof form. Applicant should refer to the Phase One approval of Product "D" for more clarification Auburn Lane Cottage, · COTTAGE: Main roof hip w/intersecting gable Craftsman, roof; 6:12 roof pitch; 12" overhangs; 2x6 rafter Spanish Colonial tails; flat concrete tiles; sand finish' stucco; recessed shingle hung windows at front; horizontal siding accent at gable end; and shutters. Staff recommends that the additional architectural features be utilized: swooping roof at the front elevation, more roof variation, entry accent with real stone, and potshelves. R:~D F',2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarxsota Product Review~Staff Report-COA'd~C Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 7 PRODUCT ARCHITECTURAL ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTERISTICS REVIEW STYLE Auburn Lane Cottage, · CRAFTSMAN: Window accent per style; Craftsman, traditional shutter accent; siding accent at gable Spanish Colonial end with beam & knee brace; trim accent; column accent; shingle siding accent; stone accent; flat concrete tile with a roof pitch of 4:12; 2x8 fascia w/18" eave & 12" rake; 2x stucco trim; plumb cut rake ends; paneled garage door; accent lighting. Staff recommends that the additional amhitectural features be utilized: less stucco and more siding, columns be more broad at the base, entry porches with heavy square columns or posts on stone piers, basic gable roof side to side or front to back with cross gables, 18"-24" overhangs, and more variation in roof form. · SPANISH COLONIAL: Recessed theme window; stucco eave accent at gable end; window accent per style; rustic shutter accent; tile accent at gable end; "S" Iow profile concrete tile roof with 4:12 pitch; 2x8 fascia w/12" eave & 6" rake; 2x stucco trim; plumb cut rake ends; paneled garage door; accent lighting. Staff recommends that the additional architectural features be utilized: No square windows, windows and garage door entryway to be arched, more use of wrought iron, scones, and/or decorative tiles, no wrought iron shall be installed over windows, more variation in roof form. Applicant should refer to the Phase One approval of Product "D" for more clarification Garaqe Placement All four (4) product reviews are considered "architectural-forward" which are strongly encouraged by the design guidelines in the Harveston Specific Plan. Garages can be accessed through the porte cocheres or off the street. The homesites have been dimensioned to allow the "living" portions of the residence to be pulled forward on the lot so that active, articulated architecture can visually dominate the street scene, rather than have the garages dominate the street scene. Entryways have been designed off the street as well as an angle to show a variety at the front elevation of the residence. Massinq The proposal gives careful attention not to create massive structures by stepping back second stories and having a number of varying roof planes. A sense of variety for single story elements can be seen with the use of covered porches and covered entryways leading to the residence. Window trim, accent vents, shutters, additional siding, additional roof ridges, and arched doorways have been incorporated on the enhanced plans for public view as required by the design guidelines of the Harveston Specific Plan. R:XI) 1~2003\03-0432 Harvcston Sarasota Product Rcvicw~Staff Rcport~COA~C Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 8 Buildinq Materials Building materials and colors have been incorporated to match the proposed architectural style. Each architectural style has 2-3 siding, roof and stucco color to choose from. All materials and colors that have been proposed by the applicant have been found to be consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class, name, type) (or) The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. FINDINGS Staff recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. C. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. ATTACHMENTS 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 10 PA03-0432 - PC Resolutions No. 2003- PA03-0433 - PC Resolutions No. 2003- PA03-0435 - PC Resolutions No. 2003- PA03-0436 - PC Resolutions No. 2003- - Blue Page 11 - Blue Page 12 - Blue Page 13 - Blue Page 14 Harveston Specific Plan Design Guidelines - Blue Page 15 Approved Phase One Architectural Styles - Blue Page 16 R:~D P~2,003\03-0432 Harveston Sar~sota Product Review\Staff Report-COA~PC Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 9 ATFACHMENT NO. 1 PLAN REDUCTIONS R:~D I~.003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA~C Staff Rpt Contiatmaee dec 3 2003.dot 10 ~ ~LJ I °° ~ 0 !i ~L_J I '-'7 i l-r [] z o .< X ~dillhill{ d ill ../. ]i ' :, i!, lu !~:~I,~ ,!l!l ~i~,,~'lj~l,l,lll~ I I il ? Y uJ FTq o< L} ® F-~ Fl~ z ® ® m z ~<z z I 1 z i~ I uzr.~ ~ ~'-( I'T-I rn eeeeeeeee®e~_~._~ i-n e i 0 '. I ~ BgvMc~ NOIg~VM Ii l'J ,:i ,,,J © ;> X z~ X ?i i ,I - Iii IjJ,i I II!mi ,Il !1~ 114 ,,II,i! Jill JlJl 'd, Il,, Jllill h! :llj III. ~,l~,: .,:, jjj[lllll,,ij,,, il ii: :qld.~ ii:l~i : ~::: ~ h!l~ Il : I,: :,:I,: :::,,:::: ::::,, ::, :[lllllJi lhi~l :J~: lllhl: I ,, i I : I I-I, z ~ o '~ u ~ 0 Il/ ,L Z Z O~ o ~ '~0 I__ 0 Z~ Z 0 2;0 0 ~0~ Z ~0 0 Zz O~ Ij] _/ _/ ~ 0 _/ _/ Z Z I'- ltl O0 'g ~G~H~I NOIG~V'H ~ / / =~IT ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PA03-0432 - PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- R:~D PX2003\03-0432 Harvest. on Sarasota Product Review~taff Report~,COA~PC Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 11 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0432 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 109-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (SARASOTA, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 2). WHEREAS, Lennar Homes filed Planning Application No. PA03-0432 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval.of the Applicat on subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Harveston Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. TheprojectisalsoconsistentwiththeMediumlandusedesignationcontainedinthe General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. R:~D P~2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Report-COA\PC Resolution. DOC 1 The overall design of the single-family residences, including the site, building, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. The overall design of the sing/e-family residences are consistent with the design guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan Sections 10.0 through 11.0. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves the application (PA 03-0432) a product review of a 109-1ot single-family residential subdivision (Sarasota, Phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2) for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 3~ day of December 2003. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R;',,D P~003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report-COA\PC Resolution. DOC 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of December 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P~003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report-COA\PC Resolution. DOC 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:'~D P~2003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report~COA~C Resolution. DOC 4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0432 (Development Plan) Project Description: A request for Product Review and approval of three model types and associated elevations within the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2 to be constructed on 109 lots within Tracts 30668, 30668-1, & 30669-1 (Lennar Homes) DIF: Per Development Agreement Approval Date: December 3, 2003 Expiration Date: December 3, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its R:~D P~003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Repor~~COA\PC Resolution. DOC 5 officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions ara measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. 9. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. 10. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 11. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. 12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. R:'~D P~2003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Report-COA\PC Resolution. DOC 6 13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored amhitectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 14. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, conditions of approval for PA00- 0295 (Tract 29639), the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Harveston Specific Plan. 15. The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. 16. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Attachment 1, or as amended by any other related conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identifythe total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of building permits: a. Myoporum pacificum shall be deleted from the plant legend of the landscape plans. 17. Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. 18. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. 19. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that all homes will have double paned windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. 20. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. 21. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 22. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 23. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. R:'tD P~2003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Report~COA'v°C Resolution. DOC 7 24. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. 25. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. 26. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. 27. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. 28. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the houm of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 29. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 30. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. 31. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 32. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 33. The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. R:~ID P~2003~03-0432 Ha~,eston Sarasota Product Review~St,3ff Report~COA\PC Resolution,DOC 8 34. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date R:\D P~003\03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review\Staff Report-COA\PC Resolution. DOC 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 PA03-0433 - PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- R:~D P~2003~)3-0432 I-Iaxveston Satasota Product RevievAStaff Repo~COA~PC Staff Rpt Continuance dee 3 2003,dot 12 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0433 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 78-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (CHATHAM, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 1). WHEREAS, Lennar Homes filed Planning Application No. PA03-0433 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner proscribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Harveston Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the single-family residences, including the site, building, and other R:~D P~003~03-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA',,PC Resolution~COA. DOC 1 associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. The overall design of the single-family residences is consistent with the design guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan Sections 10.0 through 11.0. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review {CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves the application (PA 03-0433) a product review of a 78-1ot single-family residential subdivision (Chatham, Phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 1 ) for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 3rd day of December 2003. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R:\D P~003~03-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA\PC Resolufion-COA.DOC 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted b~ the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3'~ day of December, 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:'~D P~003~03-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:',D P~003~03-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA\PC Resolutlon~COA.DOC 4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0433 (Development Plan) Project Description: A request for Product Review and approval of three model types and associated elevations within the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area I to be constructed on 78 lots within Tracts 30667 & 30667-2 (Lennar Homes) DIF: Per Development Agreement Approval Date: December 3, 2003 Expiration Date: December 3, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its R:\D P~2003\03-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA\PC Resolution~COA. DOC 5 officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear intedor dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. 9. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. 10. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 11. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. 12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. R:~ P',2003V33-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA\PC Resolut~on~COA.DOC 6 13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored amhitectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 14. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, conditions of approval for PA00- 0295 (Tract 29639), the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Harveston Specific Plan. 15. The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. 16. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Attachment 1, or as amended by any other related conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of building permits: a. Myoporum pacificum shall be deleted from the plant legend. b. Street trees on Chatham shall be coordinated with the park street trees to the west. 17. Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. 18. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. 19. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that all homes will have double parted windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. 20. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. 21. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 22. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. R;\D P~003\03-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review\Staff Rpt-COA\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 7 23. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. 24. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. 25. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. 26. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. 27. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. 28. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 29. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 30. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. 31. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 32. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 33. The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. R:',D P~003~03-0433 Ha~eston Chatham Product Review\Staff Rpt-COA'~PC Resolution-COA.DOC 8 34. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date R:\D P~003~3-0433 Harveston Chatham Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA\PC Resolut[on~COA.DOC 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PA03-0435 - PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- R:~I) P~2003~03-0432 Harveston Sarosota Product RcvievAStaff Report--COA~'C Staff Rpt Confnuance dec 3 2003.dot 13 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0435 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 93-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (ST. AUGUSTINE, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 1) WHEREAS, Lennar Homes filed Planning Application No. PA03-0435 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findin.qs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with ali applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Harveston Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. R:'~D P~003\03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review\Staff Rpts~COA's~PC Resolution~COA. DOC 1 The overall design of the single-family residences, including the site, building, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. The overall design of the single-family residences are consistent with the design guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan Sections 10.0 through 11.0. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves the application (PA 03-0435) a product review of a 93-1ot single-family residential subdivision (St. Augustine, Phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 1 ) for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 3rd day of December 2003. ATTEST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R:~D P~2003V:)3-0435 Herveston St. Augustine Product Review~Staff Rpts~COA's~PC ResoJution~COA.DOC 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of December 2003, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P~2003\03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review~Staff Rpts~COA's~PC Resolution~COA.DOC 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:',D P~2003~03-O435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review,Staff Rpts~COA's~PC Resolution~COA. DOC 4 Project Description: DIF: Approval Date: Expiration Date: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0435 (Development Plan) A request for Product Review and approval of three model types and associated elevations within the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area I to be constructed on 93 lots within Tracts 30667-1, & 30667-3 (Lennar Homes) Per Development Agreement December 3, 2003 December 3, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resoumes Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its R:~D P~003\03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review~Staff Rpts~COA's\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 5 officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. 9. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. 10. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 11. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. 12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. R:~D P~2003\03-0435 Har~eston St. Augustine Product Review~Staff Rpts~COA's\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 6 13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 14. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and conditions of approval for PA00-0295 (Tract 29639), the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Harveston Specific Plan. 15. The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. 16. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Attachment 1, or as amended by any other related conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of building permits: a. Myoporum pacificum shall be deleted from the plant legend. b. The spacing of the Gazania shall be revised to 12" on center. 17. Chimney caps are to represent the amhitectural style accurately. Staff is to review and approve chimney caps prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. All railings shall be made of quality grade wrought iron. No wood shall be utilized. 19. Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. 20. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. 21. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that all homes will have double paned windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. 22. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. 23. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. R:~D P~2003~03-0435 Harveston St. Augustine product Review~Staff Rpts~COA%\PC Resolution-COA.DOC 7 24. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 25, A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. 26. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. 27. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. 28. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and odginal signed by an appropriate registered professional. 29. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. 30. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 31. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 32. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. 33. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 34. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 35. The developer shall submit proof that ail local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. R:~D P~2003~03-0435 Harveston St, Augustine Product Review'~Staff Rpts-COA's~PC Resolution-COA. DOC 8 36. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date R:\D P\2003~)3-0435 Harveston St. Augustine Product Review'~Staff Rpts~COA's\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 PA03-0436 - PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0436 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 119-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (AUBURN LN. PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 2). WHEREAS, Lennar Homes filed Planning Application No. PA03-0436 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner proscribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on December 3, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Harveston Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. R:'~O P~003\03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA's\PC ResolutJon~COA.DOC 1 The overall design of the single-family residences, including the site, building, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. The overall design of the single-family residences is consistent with the design guidelines as set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan Sections 10.0 through 11.0. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves the application (PA 03-0436) a product review of a 119-lot single-family residential subdivision (Auburn Ln., Phase 2 of the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2) for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set fo~h on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 3rd day of December 2003. A'I-I'EST: Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R:~D P~003\03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA's~F'C Resolution-COA. DOC 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CiTY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2003- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of December 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:~D P~003\03-0436 Harveston Aubum Lane Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA's\PC Resolution~COA. DOC 3 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:'~D P~2003~03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review~Staff Rpt~COA's~PC Resolufion~COA.DOC 4 Project Description: DIF: Approval Date: Expiration Date: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0436 (Development Plan) A request for Product Review and approval of three model types and associated elevations within the Harveston Specific Plan Planning Area 2 to be constructed on 119 lots within Tract 30668-2 &30669-2 (Lennar Homes) Per Development Agreement December 3, 2003 December 3, 2005 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resoumes Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its R;\D P~003\03-0436 Harveston Aubum Lane Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA's\PC Resolution-COA.DOC 5 officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. = The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. 9. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. 10. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 11. 12. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. R:~D P~003\03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review~Staff Rpt-COA's\PC Resolution~COA, DOC 6 13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 14. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and conditions of approval for PA00-0295 (Tract 29639), the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Harveston Specific Plan. 15. The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. 16. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Attachment 1, or as amended by any other related conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of building permits: a. Myoporum pacificum shall be deleted from the plant legend. b. Street trees on Pasadena Drive shall be coordinated with the street trees at the Lakefront Cottages and Sarasota neighborhoods. c. Street trees shall be coordinated on Edenton way and Logan Courts with the Sarasota neighborhood. 17. Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. 18. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. 19. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that all homes will have double paned windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. 20. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. 21. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. R;\D P~003\03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review~Staff Rpt-COA's\PC Resolution~COA.DOC 7 22. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 23. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. 24. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. 25. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. 26. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and odginal signed by an appropriate registered professional. 27. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. 28. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 29. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 30. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. 31. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 32. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 33. The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. R:~D P~2003\03-0436 Haweston Auburn Lane Product Review~Staff Rpt-COA's\PC Resolution~COA.OOC 8 34. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date R;\D P~003\03-0436 Harveston Auburn Lane Product Review\Staff Rpt~COA's'~PC Resolution~COA.DOC 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN GUIDELINES R:~D PX2003X03-0432 I-larveston Sarasota Product Revicw~Staff Report-COAWC Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 15 SECTION 10.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES AMERICAN FARMHOUSE INSPIRATION PHOTO: APPROPRIATE STYLE ELEMENTS: · Simple plan form massing and simple roof design · Porches with simple wood columns · Porches with wood railings · 6:12 to 9:12 roofpitch · Front to back main gable roof · 12" overhangs · Amhitectuml quality wood or asphalt shingles or smooth flat concrete tiles · Light to medium sand finish stucco or blended siding and stucco · Vertical mulfi-paned windows at front elevations and in high visibility public view areas · Single paned windows on sides and rear elevations ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS: · White vinyl wrapped aluminum windows · Stucco finish or horizontal siding wrapped ~:himney · Garage door patterns complimentary to style · Minimum 2x4 wood window and door trim · Whites or dark stucco body colors · Light earth tone bodies with contrasting cool or warm trims · White or dark color accent trims Note: The photographs and drawings used to demonstrate a so'le are meant to be inspirational and not to be construed as a rigid formula for design. Harveston Specific Plan 10-69 ~ 19~18#~4to.~lt DECFM[~E~ S~E¢IFR PLAN'REVISEDHAi~V[qSTON R£VI$~DiiiDOC SECTION 10.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES CAPE COD INSPIRATION PHOTO: APPROPRIATE STYLE ELEMENTS: · 2 story simple "salt box" massing · 5:12to 7:12 roof pitch · 12" to 18" overhang · Simple hip or gable roof with one forward facing intersecting gable roof · Architectural quality wood or asphalt shingles or smooth fiat concrete tiles · Blended siding and stucco · Light to medium sand finish or light lace finish stucco · Vertically hung mulli6ned windows at front elevation and in high visibility areas · Often ganged in pairs · Single parted windows on sides and rears ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS: · Porches with wood columns and railings · 2x4 wood window trim surrounds · Garage door patterns complimentary to style · White to mid value body colors · White vinyl wrap aluminum windows Note: The photographs and drasvings used to demonstrate a sO,le are meant to be inspirational and not to be construed as a rigid formula for design. Harveston Specific Plan 10,70 SECTION 10.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES COLONIAL [NSPIRATION PHOTO: APPROPRIATE STYLE ELEMENTS: · Simple plan form massing and simple roof design · 6:12to 12:12 roof pitch · 0" to 12" overhangs · Front to back dominant gable roof with one intersecting gable roof · Architectural quality wood or asphalt shingles or smooth fiat concrete tiles · Fine to light sand finish or light lace finish stucco or blended siding and stucco · Vertical multi-paned windows at front elevations and in high visibility public view ar~as ADDITIONAL S'~YLE ELEMENTS: Single parted windows on sides and rear elevations · Minimum 2x4 wood window and door trim · White vinyl wrapped aluminum windows · Entry porches with simply trimmed wood columns · Stucco finish or horizontal siding wrapped chimney · Garage door patterns complimentary to style · Round attic vents · Brick accents · Shutters · Pastels to cool colors with white trims · Dark color shutters · White trim / fascias Note: The photographs and dra~'ings ztsed to demonstrate a so,lc are meant to be inspirational and not to be construed as a rigid formula.for design. SECTION 10.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES COTTAGE INSPIRATION PHOTO: APPROPRIATE STYLE ELEMENTS: · Rectangular plan form massing with some recessed 2nd floor area · Main roof hip or gable with intersecting gable roofs · 6:12to 12:12 roof pitch · 0" to 12" overhangs · Architectural quality wood or asphalt shingles or smooth fiat concrete tiles · Light to medium sand finish or light lace finish stucco · Single paned windows on sides and rears ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS'- Vertical shaped windows with mullions and simple wood 2x trim at front elevation and at high visibility areas · Entry accents with real or faux stone · Entry porches with stucco columns and wood railings · Garage door patterns to compliments style · Shutters · Whites and earth tones · Dark color accents / trim (shutters) · White vinyl wrapped aluminum windows · Stucco over foam window and door trim Note: The photographs and &'m$,ings used to demonstrate a sO'lc are meant to be inspirational and not to be construed as a rigid formula for design. Harveston Specific Plan ' 10-72 SECTION 10.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES CRAFTSMAN INSPIRATION PHOTO: ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS: · Windows are often ganged in pairs · Single parted windows at sides and rears · White vinyl wrap aluminum windows · Arts and crafts style lighting fixtures · Shaped wood header trim at windows and doors · Simple knee brace · Outlooker · Light earth tone colors · Playful / dark accent APPROPRIATE STYLE ELEMENTS: · Simple :2 story boxed massing with vertical and horizontal breaks · Entry porches with heavy square columns or posts on stone piers · 3¼ 12 to4~ 12 roof pitch · 18" to 24" overhangs · Architectural quality asphalt shingles or shingles texture fiat concrete tiles · Basic gable roof side to side or front to back with cross gables · Blended siding and stucco · Light to medium sand finish or California Monterey Finish · Vertically hung upper mullioned windows at front elevation and in high visibility areas Note; The photographs and drwa.ings used to demonstrate a sO.[e are meant to be inspirational and not to be construed as a rigid formula for design. Harveslon Specific Plan I 0-73 P v~ms:~t~-~.loE¢'~.;taEIl.~l~Ct~l¢.tn_~.,q ~v SFJ~:q.xR'~i~ R~XlS~Oi. ~ SECTION 10.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES EAST COAST TI;/,ADITIONAL INSPIRATION PHOTO: APPROPRIATE STYLE ELEMENTS: · Plan form massing with a vertical and an horizontal break · 6:12to 12:12 roof pitch · 18" to 24" overhangs · Concrete roof tile with shingle look · Front to back gable or hip roof with intersecting hip or gable roofs · Blended stucco and siding · Single parted windows at sides and rears · White vinyl wrap aluminum windows · Decorative accent windows ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS: · Full wood porches and or wood balconies · Simpilfled versions of Colonial cornice trim at gable ends · 2x6 wood windows and door trim · Garage door patterns complimentary to style · White detailing trims Note: The photographs and drawings used to dentonstrate a so'le are meant to be inspirational and not to be construed as a rigid formula for design. Harvestan Specific Plan 10-74 SECTION 10.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES ITALIANATE INSPIRATION PHOTO: APPROPRIATE STYLE ELEMENTS: · 2 story massing with one vertical and one horizontal break · Main hip roof with minor intersecting hip roofs · 3~ 12 to 4~ 12 roof pitch · 24" overhangs, stucco soffits · "S' shaped concrete tiles · Fine to light sand finish or light lace finish Stucco · Vertically hung 9 and 12 paned windows at front elevation and in high visibility areas · Often ganged in pairs · Single paned windows at sides and rears · White vinyl wrap aluminum windows · Arched top accent windows ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS: · Tapered round or square simple stucco columns · Shutters · Entry porch · Belt course trim · Mid value saturated colors Note: The photographs and drawings used to demonstrate a sO,le are meant to be inspirational and not to be construed as a rigid formula for design. SECTION 10.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES SPANISH COLONIAL INSPIRATION PHOTO: ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS: · White vinyl wrap aluminum windows · Stucco over foam window and door trim · Arched stucco column porches · Garage door patterns complimentary to style · White tone body with bright accent trim · Dark brown trims APPROPRIATE STYLE ELEMENTS: · 2 story massing with strong one story element · 4:12to5:12 roof pitch · 12" to 18" overhang · Simple hip or gable roof with one intersecting gable roof · Barrel or"S" shape concrete tiles · Fine to light sand finish or light lace finish StllC¢O · Vertically hung 9 and 12 pan~d windows at front elevation and in high visibility areas · Ot~en ganged in pairs · Single parted windows at sides and rears Note: The photographs and drawings ttsed to demonstrate a so,le are meant to be inspirational and not to be construed as a rigid formtda for design. Harveston Specific plan 10-78 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.3 PLANNING AREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.3.1 Planning Area 1: Low Medlnm Density Residential and Community Park Description pJannlng Area I as depicted in Figure 11.1, Planning Area Detail 1, provides for 41.1 acres of Low Medium density residential uses. A total of 164 dwelling units are planned at a target density of 4.0 du/ae (Density Range 3-5 du/ac). Additionally, a 16.5-acre commnnity park is p]anned Mt[fin Planning .Area 1. Within the Comm~tnity Park, there is a 1.3-acre out parcel. A mini park is also proposed within the residential portion of the Planning Area. The proposed product types for this planning area includes single family detached and possibly duplex or cluster develOpment. Land Use Develonment Standards Please refer to Zoning Ordinance in )hi~ Section of the Specific Plan (see Section I 1.4). Planning Standards Access into Plznnlng Area 1 shall be provided from the Loop Road with internal access through Planning Area 5. Specific location of the access point~ shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage (refer to Figure 10.1-12). 2. Please refer to Section 10.0 for specific Design Guidelines and other related design. Special landscape lxeatment shall be provided along the edge of the Pla~nlng Area boundary and Loop Road (refer to Figure 10.1-8). A commqnity pa~oo and a Class II bike lane shall be provided along the Loop Road (refer to Figure 10.1-8). The Community Park shall contain lighted sports fields, picnic area, tot lot, and more (refer to Figures 6-3A - 6-3D). 6. A parking area shall be provided for the Community Park (refer to Figures 6-3A - 6~3D). Roadway landscape buffer txeatment shall be provided along the outer boundary of the Community Park (refer to Fignres 6-3A - 6-3D). Special Community Park landscape buffer treatment shall be provided along the Community Park boundary adjacent to the residential neighborhoods (refer to Figures 6-3A - 6-3D). Please refer to the following sections for General Development Standards that apply site-wide: am Land Use Plan Circulation Plan Infrastxucmre Plan Open Space and Recreation Plan Grading Plan Landscaping Plan Harveston Specific Plan REVISED 8/14/01 iI 'SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.4.1 p!annin~ Areas 1~ 4~ ?~ and 10 The following regulations shall apply in thc Low Medium Density Residentiah · ZONING ORDINANCE Low Medium (LM) Density Residential Zone (3-5 dwelling units per acre) Permitted / Conditionally Permitted.Uses Matrix Low Medium ResidenOnl AIl types of non-commercial ho-icnlture P Churches, synagogues and other similar religions slruct~es' and facilities including C incidental uses such as assembly, work rooms, living quarters of a priest, minister or fnmil,v, and day care and educational facilities. Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly P Da)' care centers C Famil,v day care homes ~ large, as defined by State law. C F~mil.v day care homes - nmall - 6 or fewer P C~roup care facilities and reSidenfizl retirement homes, 6 or less people P ~ , A P ~ed such occupations are customarily conducted as an accessory P use entirely within a building containing a residential use or atlached garage. No outdoor storage or uses ~hall be permitted. · · · ' · i Public and ptivate recreational facilities including, but not limited to: co,tory clubs, tenms P and swim clubs, golf comses, lakes, parks, racquetball and handball. Limited commercial uses which are commonly associated and directly related to the primary uses are petrol,ed. Public park and public playgro-nd~ ' · P Re~iaential care facilities for the el&erly (six or fewer) P Secondary dwelling unlt~granny flats/guest house P Single family clatacho4t, .~ingle fnmil~' nnaehed P Te]ecommnnleafion towers P Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and P during the original sale of the subdivision, provided a development plan is approved pursuant to City Ordinance. Trails P Other Uses: Any use that is not specifically listed above may be considered a permitted use provided that the Director of Planning finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process, which governs.the category in which it falls. Harveston Specific Plan SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards The following development standards shall apply in the Low Medium Density Residential Zone of Planning Areas 1, 4, 7, and' 10. Table 11.1 provides a graphic summary of the following Low Medium (LM) development standards at the end of this section. L Building height shall no~ exceed two (2) stories, with a maximum height of thirty five feet (35~. 2. A minimum of 50% of Low Medium units shall incorporate architectural forward designs. Minimum residential lot area shall be not less than four thousand (4,000) square feet and the average residential lot area shall be not less than five thousand (5,000) square feet. Land acreage located within Landscape Development Zones (LDZ's) shall not be included in area calculations for meeting minimum lot size requirem~nta. The mlnlnaum lot width at the front propexty line shall be thirty feet (30'), with an average lot width of forty five (45') and a minlrrlum lot depth of eighty (80'). Lots at the end of cul-de-sacs and knuckles may vary from the minimum depth requirement provided a. lot provides an adequate area for development. The minimum lot width for a flag lot, cul-de-sac, or knuckle at front propeWj line shall be twenty feet (20'). :7. The minimum lot width at required front setback area shall be fon'y feet (40'). 8. Minimum yard requirements are as follows: Minimum front yard - Variable Front Yard Setback: In order to allow for a more intoresting visual image end mom flexible site planning, variable setbacks shall be used in the LM planning areas in accordance with Section 10.5 (Principal Design Criteria). Front yard. setbacks from garage doors shall be a minimum of 18 feet to hack of sidewalk. Other portions of a sm~cture (including-garages with en?..an, ces not facing the street) shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. Building Setha~kz shah be measured from the property line. - Minimum interior Side yard - Variable Side yard Setbacks: Variable side yard setbacks may be permitted provided the sum of the side yard setbacks is not less than 10 feet and the distance between adjacent su'uctures is not less than 10 feet.. For front loaded conditions a minimum of five-foot setback area, free of architectural encroachments shall be maintained on at least one side. Variable rear yard setback: 1) Garage forward and front leaded: the minimum rear yard setback shall be 20 feet. 2) Recessed garage: the minimum rear yard setback to the garage shall be 5 feet and the main structure setback shall be 20' (ground floor) and 7' for second story elements over the garage.. 3) Rear vehicle access: the minimum rear yard setback to the garage shall be 3 feet and the main structure setback shall be 20' (ground floor) and a 3' minimum with a 5' average setback for second story elements over the garage. ,at the rear of each lot, a minimum of 16 square feet of landscaping shall be provided per lot (refer to Figure 11.13). SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS d. The comer side yard shall not be less than ten feet (10'). 10. 11. The Planning Commission may approve modifications to these standards up to 15% for innovative and quality designs that meet the intent of the provisions for this Specific Plan. Parking. A minln~lm of two (2) enclosed spaces s~s!! be provided per unit/lot. Enclosures shall comply with all yard requirements. For second units, one additional enclosed parking space shall be provided. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall be permitted within the front, side, and rear yard set back areas, except as provided for below: a. Fences may not be erected within either public or private slreet rights-of-way. Wherever fencing is visible from public view, the finished side of the fencing shall be exposed to public view. Co No fence or wall shall exceed six feet (6~) in height, unless a higher wall is specifically required for sound attenuation purposes. The height of the fence or wall shall be measured from the highest ground level immediately adjacent to the base of the wall. Privacy walls, if provided in side and tear yards, shall be a minimum of five feet (5~ in height. In front yard set back areas, solid fences and walls shall not exceed thirty inches (30") in height; provided, however, that fences and walls up to six feet (6~ in height are permitted in front yards if the area above thirty inches (30") is no more than thirty percent (30%) solid.. All pool enclosure fencing shall conform to applicable State of California or City of Temeonla pool code fencing requirements, whichever is more stringent. ' Harveston Specific Plan REVISED. 8/14/01 SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS T~J~Lg 11.1 SUMMARY DEVELOP~ STANDARDS FOR LM (Low ME~Vv'M D~srrY , ZONE Minlmmn Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit 4,000 Averse Lot Area Pe~ Dwellin~ Unit 5,000 Dwellin~ Units Per Net Acre 3 - 5 ~OT DIMm~S~ONS lvflnimqm Lot Width at F~vut Property Line 30 i Minlmmn Lot Width for a Flag Lot, cul-de-sac, or knuckle at From 20 Property Line Minimum Lot Width at Required Front Setback Area 40 Aveta~ Lot Width 45 Minimum Lot De~th 80 ~inlmlllll F~ORt Yard Variable* ~l'inlm~rm COVIa' Side Yard I0 'Minim~ml ll~terior Side Yard Variable* ~flnlmnm Rear Yard Variable* ~ix'mlUM HEIGHT ~ *Refer to Page 11-29 for specific setback requirements. FRONT LOADED D~r RECESseD 'REAR ACCESS. SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.3.2 Planning Area 2: Medium 1 Density Residential Description planning Area 2, as depicted in Figure 11.2, Planning Area Detail 2, provides for 40.1 acres of Medium 1 density residential uses. A total of 241 dwelling units are planned at a target density of 6.0 du/ac (Density Range 5-7 du/ac). This planning area also includes a portion of the 2.0-acre Paseo Park, which connects the Lake Park to the Community Park. The proposed product types for this plannlng area include, small lot single family detached, attached and cluster development. l~nd Use Development Standards Please refer to Zoning Ordinance in this Section of tbe Specific Plan (refer to Section 11-4). Pianni~ 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Access into Planning Area 2 shall be provided.from the Loop Road at a minimum of two entry points with internal access through planning Area 3. Specific location of the access points shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage (refer to Fignre~ 10.1-10.1-12). Plea~ refer to Section 10.0 for specific Design Guidelines and other related design. Special landscaping treatment shall be provided along the Loop Road (refer to Figure 10.1-8). A community paseo and a Class II bike lane shall be provided along the Loop Road. The paseo shall be located along the outer edge of the Loop Road (refer to Figure 10.1-8). A 2.0-acre pasco park shall be provided in Planning Area 2, which will intercept Planning Area 3, connecting to the Lake Park (refer to Figures 6.5 and 10.1-13). A pasco edge landscape treatment shall be provided along the edges of the paseo park (refer to Figures 6.5 and 10.1-13). An 8'paseo trail shall be provided in the~paseo-~ark (refer to Figures 6.5 and 10.1-13). Please refer to the following sections for General Development Standards that apply site-wide: Land Use Plan Circulation Plan lnfraStlellcture Plan Open Space and Recreation Plan Grading Plan Landscaping Plan Harveston Specific Plan REVISED 8/14/01 Harveston Specific Plan Lennar Communities Key Map: MEDIUM 1 40.1 AC 241 UNITS ~ Februa_qr 2001 bEE FI~. 10.1-13 SEE FIG. 10.1-12 SEE FIG. 10.1-8 CLASS n SEE FIG. 10.1-8 Figure 11.2 Plannihg'Are,4 Detail SECTION 11;0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11.4.2 Medium 1 (MI) Density Residential Zone (5-7 dwelling units per acre) Plannln Areas 2 and 8 The folloxving regulations shall apply in the Medium I Density Residential: Permitted / Conditionally Permitted Uses Matrix Medium 1 All types of non ~nmmercial hortlo~!mre P Churches, synagogues and other similar religious structures and facilities including C incidental uses Such as assembly, work rooms, living quaxters of a priest, minister or family, and day care and ed_~r~tional f~¢!!ities, p Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly C Day care centers Family day care homes - large; as defined by State law. C Family day care hom~ - ~rn~ll, 6 or fewer . P Group ca~ facilities and r~itl,~nfisl retiren~nt homes, 6 or less people P Guest house or granny flat P Home occupations, provided such occupations are customarily conducted as an P accessory use entirely within a building containing a residential use or attached garage. No outdoor storage or uses ~hsll be permitted. Public and private recreational facilities including,, but not limited to: country, clubs, P tennis and swim clubs, golf courses~ lakes, parks, racquetball and handball. Limited commercial USes which .are commonly associated and directly related to the primary uses are p~ _rp~ined. p Public parks and public playgrounds p Rear ?et.~ Residential car~ facilities for'the elderly (six or_fewer) '1 p Secondary dwelling units/granny flats/guest house P Single ~amilv detsehe~d, ~msl] lot ~!P~I~ family detached, single family attached, cluster P Temporary real estate tract offices located within a subdivision, to be used only for and P during the original sale of the subdivision, provided a development plan is approved pursuant to City Orrl!nsnce. Trails P Other Uses: Any use that is not specifically listed above may be considered a permitted use provided that the Director of Planning finds that the proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process, which governs the cat_¢~ory in which it falls. SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Development Standards The following development standards shall apply in the Medium 1 Density Residential Zone of Planning Areas 2 and 8. Table 11.2 provides a graphic summary of the following Medium 1 (MI) development standards at the end of this section. For cluster projects within the MI, M2 and High density zoning districts, the development standards for lot size~ and setbacks may be varied by the Director of Planning as long as the cluster project falls within the allowed density ranges of the appropriate zone district. The purpose of this provision is to allow for innovative and alternative housing types around courtyards and common areas. 1. Building height shall not exceed two (2) stories, with a .maximum height of thLrty five feet (357. 2. A minimum of 50% of Medium 1 units shall incorporate architecture forward designs. Minimmn residential lot area shall be not les~ than three thousand (3,000) square feet and the average residential lot area shall be not less ~han three thousand five hundred (3,500) square feet Airspace condomininm~ are exempt from the minimum lot size requirements provided that the overall density is consistent with the pJannlng area reqnimmeots. Land acreage located witllin Landscape Development Zones (LDZ's) shall not be included in area calculations for meeting minimum lot size requirements. The minimum lot width at the front property line shall be twenty five feet (25'), with an average lot width of forty feet (40') and a minimum lot depth of seventy feet (?0'). 1.6ts at the end of cul- · de-sacs and knuckles may vary from the minimRm depth requirement provided a lot provides an adequate area for development. The minimum lot width for a flag lot, cul-de-sac, or knuckle at front property line shall be twenty feet (20'). 8. The minimum lot width at required front setback area shall be thirty five feet (35'). Minimum yard requirements are as follows: Minimum front yard - Variable Front Yard Setback: In order m allow for a more interesting visual image and more-flexible site planning, variable setbacks shall be used in thc MI planning area in accordance with Section 10.5 (Principal Design Criteria), · Front yard setbacks from garage doors to back of sidewalk shall be a minimum of 18 feet. The main building strueture setback shall be 10 feet from the property line. Other portions of a structure (including patios, porches and entrances) may be setback a minimum of 7 feet. Building setbacks shall be measured from the property line. Minimum interior side yard - Variable Side Yard Setbacks: Variable side yard setbacks may be permitted provided the sum of the side yard setbacks is not less than 8 feet and the distance between adjacent sU'uctures is not less than 8 feet. For front loaded SECTION 11.0 DEVELOPM .NT STANDARDS conditions a minimum of four-foot setback area, free of architectural en~roaclunents shall be maintained on at least one side. c. Variable rear yard setback: 1) Garage forward and front loaded: a 10-foot minimum rear yard setback is permitted in the M-1 disU'iet, provided an average setback of 15 feet shall be 2) Rear vehicle access: the mlnlrm.n rear yard setback to the garage shall be 3 feet and the main smacture setback shall be 15~ (ground floor) and a 3' minimum with a 5' average setback for second story elements over the garage. At the rear of each lots, a minimum of 14 square feet of landscaping shall be provided (refer to Figure 11.13). 10. c.' The comer side yard shall not be less than ten feet (10') The planning Commission may approve modifications to these standards up to 15% for innovative and qn~llty desiglls that meet the intent of the provisions for this Specific Plan (refer to Section 11.5 of this document). 11. 12. Parking. A minimum of two (2) enclosed spaces shall be provided p~r uni~lot. Enclosu~s shall comply with all yard ~zluiremants. Fences and Walls. Fences and walls shall be permitted within front, side, and rear yard set back areas except as provided for below: a. Fences may not be erected within either, public or'private street rights-of-way. Wherever fencing is vis~le from public view, the finished side of the fencing shall be exposed to public view. c. No fence or wall shall exceed six feet (6') in height, unless a higher wall is specifically required for sound attenuation purposes. The height of the wall or fence shall be measured from the highest ground level immediately adjacent to the base of the wall. Privacy walls, if provided in side and rear yards, shall be a minimum of five feet (5') in height In front yard set back areas, solid fences and walls shall not exceed thirty inches (30") in height; provided, however, that fences and walls up to six feet (67 in height are permitted in front yards if the area above thirty inches (30") is no more than thirty percent (30%) solid. f. All pool enclosure fencing shall conform to applicable State of California or City of Temecuh pool code fencing requirements, whichever is more suingent. .... Harveston Specific Plan ................ SECTION iL0 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS T~ 11.2 SUMMARY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR M1 (MEDIUM Di~rr~ RKSlDENTIAI. $-7 DU's/A£ ZONE b41.1m,mi Lot Pa'ca Pe~ Dw~llinl~ Unit 3,000 Awra? Lot Area Per Dwellint Unit 3,~00 Dv~llln~ Units Pe~ Net Acre 5 - 7 LOT DIM~ISlOIqS ~inlmum Lot ~idth at Front Prol~'y Line 25 ~[inlmtllll Lot Width for a ~g LOt, GlI1-41O-~c,~ Or kill.ldo at F~I 20 ~v~inlmnm Lot Width at Required Front Setback Area 35 Average Lot Width 40 ~[~ nlmllm Lot Depth 70 tgr~A~ ~qiniml]m FLOut Yard Variable* Minlmnm Co~ler Side Yard 10 Minimum ~lltetior Sido Yard Variable* Minimum Roar Yard vai~blc* M~ HEIGIYr 35 *Refer w Page 11-34 for specific setback requirements. I FINDINGS Staff recommends the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 F of the Temecula Municipal Code. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. A'i-I'ACHMENTS The proposal is consistent with the Goals, and Objectives of the Harveston Specific Plan. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 10 PA03-0432 - PC Resolutions No. 2003- PA03-0433 - PC Resolutions No. 2003- PA03-0435 - PC Resolutions No. 2003- 2. - Blue Page 11 3. - Blue Page 12 4. - Blue Page 13 5. PA03-0436 - PC Resolutions No. 2003- - Blue Page 14 6. Harveston Specific Plan Design Guidelines - Blue Page 15 R:~D P~2003~03-0432 Harveston Sarasota Product Review~Staff Report-COAX~°C Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 APPROVED PHASE ONE ARCHITECTURAL STYLES R:XD PX2003\0341432 Ilarve$ton Saxasota Product Review~taff Report~COAXPC Staff Rpt Continuance dec 3 2003.dot 16 0 ~ m mm mm mm M --U 1E V SPANISH COLONIAL A W A CAPE COD B W U H P T FRONT CRAFTSMAN C P LA N 1 t~Lt~VATIONS HARVESTON 55' X 86' PRODUCT BA$$1~NIAN / LAGONI ARCHITI~CT$ U M SPANISH COLONIAL A K CAPE COD B w A C CRAFTSMAN C PLAN 2 FRONT ELEVATIONS HARVESTON /5/$' X 86' PRODUCT BA$$~NIAN / LAOONI ARCHITECTS SPANISH COLONIAL A D V CAPE COD B A W D CRAFTSMAN C PLAN 3 FRONT ELEVATIONS HARVESTON 55' X 86' PRODUCT BAS$]/NIAN / LAOONI ARCHIT]/CT$ ldoouofl - O lonpo2d ~o RI 0 -i- -4 0 60 -.I "-i- :RI 0 Z cz 0 q rn "~ r- o oz~' z ,o t-- ;/, '-1: MARGARITA ROAD IT1 --t O Z Z _.m O O O TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA PRODUCT D PLAN I AMERICAN FARMHOUSf CRa~F~$MAN · Simple knee brace · SPAN~H COLOC~AL. -ENNAR COMMUNITIES IISSION VIE JO, CALIFORNIA