Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout111903 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 19, 2003 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:01 P.M., on Wednesday November 19, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Othasso led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff ABSENT None PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 A.qenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of November 19, 2003 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of November 5, 2003 3 Director's Hearinq Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for October 2003 R:\MinutesPC~2003\l 11903 I MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve Item Nos. 1-3. Commissioner OIhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Per the request of Planning Director Ubnoske, Item No. 7 was moved off calendar; see page 9. Planninq Application No. PA00-0507 a Development Plan to desiRn and construct a three- story, 31,600 square foot, 56-unit hotel buildinq on 1.35 acres. The project site is located approximately 200 feet east of Jefferson Avenue and 200 feet north of Winchester Road RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- 060 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA00-0507 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN - JEFFERSON AVENUE INN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A THREE STORY, 31,600 SQUARE FOOT HOTEL BUILDING ON A 1.35 ACRE VACANT PARCEL, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET EAST OF JEFFERSON AVENUE AND 200 FEET NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD TO THE SOUTH OF THE COMFORT INN MOTEL, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-282- O07 Associate Planner Harris presented a brief report (as per agenda material), noting the following: · That the applicant revised the project by eliminating the fourth floor of the building and reducing the number of hotel rooms from 70 to 56; Far Reduction · That the new Floor Area Ratio (FAR) will be 0.53; that the original proposal was .71; · That staff is of the opinion that the FAR will be commensurate with other recently approved hotel facilities on similar size parcels; - That staff recommended the proposed FAR. Central Air Conditionin.q · That staff would request that Condition of Approval No. 14 be deleted (a central air conditioning system shall be incorporated into the hotel building construction drawing, All individual hotel room conditioning units shall be removed); that such a condition would not be a Development Code Requirement. R:\MinutesPC~2003\l 11903 2 RV/'rruck Parkin.q That staff requested that Condition of Approval No. 5b be deleted (two 10' x25' parking spaces shall be added onsite. The spaces shall be designated for recreational vehicle, truck and trai~er parking only); that such a condition would not be a Development Code Requirement. Facility Maintenance · That staff added a recommended condition of approval requiring that the hotel facility be fully maintained throughout the life of the facility (see condition No. 15). Landscaping That an arborist assessment report be prepared at the applicant's expense to assertain the health of existing slope trees and shrubs within the Caltrans right-of-way abutting the full length of the eastern property line; that if the trees and shrubs are unhealthy, the applicant shall prepare a revised landscape plan showing enhanced landscaping around the property line subject to the Planning Director's review and approval; That staff determined that the three-stow hotel complex consisting of 56 units, as conditioned, will be consistent with the City's General Plan, Design Guidelines, and Development Code; That the only major change to the site plan would be that the interior of the pool be moved to the rear of the facility located within the 15 noise contour area; that this area has an exterior noise level which exceeds 70 decibels; that the applicant has submitted a noise study which recommended the erection of an eight-foot tall wall around the pool to reduce the noise at the pool area below the 70 decibel maximum required in the Noise Element of the General Plan. Staff would be of the opinion that the proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and the City Design Guidelines; and therefore, would recommend approval of the Development Plan with the deletion of Condition of Approval Nos. 14 and 5b and the revision of Condition No. 20g. For Commissioner Telesio, Associate Planner Harris confirmed that Condition No. 5b would be deleted. For Commissioner Mathewson, Associate Planner Harris reiterated that Condition No. 14 would be deleted based on the fact that the building will be significantly screened; that it is not a Development Code requirement; and that the wrought iron screening will further screen the units. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Larry Markham, 41635 Enterprise Circle, representing the applicant, and noted that the applicant is in concurrence with the deletion of Condition of Approval Nos. 5b and 14 that with regard to Condition No. 20g, the applicant will not be immediately building an eight-foot tall wall. At this time, the public hearing was closed. R:\MinutesPC~003\l 11903 3 MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation subject to the changes of the condition deleting Condition No. 5b and 14 and amending No. 20g. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 5 Plannin.q Application No. PA03-0347 submitted by Griffin Communities, is a product review for 100 detached sinqle family residences within Planninq Area 4A of the Roripau.qh Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinqs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Staqe Road (APN: 957-340-001) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO, 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0347 A PRODUCT REVIEW FOR DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 4A OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED SOUTH OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 957-340-001 TRACT MAP 29661-4 Associate Planner Long, by way of Power Point, presented the report (as per agenda material), noting the following: · That the proposed project will include 99 units, not 100 (as per agenda material); that the proposed resolution has been corrected; · That the proposed project will include four architectural styles, including Mediterranean, Monterey, Ranch, and Craftsman; · That the applicant proposed various elements which staff has reviewed, and which are in compliance with the Specific Plan Design Guidelines; · That one of the four floor plans will be a single-story project; · That the Design Guidelines require four-sided architecture; · That the applicant has proposed various elements that staff has reviewed and that it will be in compliance with the Specific Plan Design Guidelines; · That the focal point of the front elevations will be the front door; · That all the projects have either a covered entry or a front porch area; · That one of the requirements in the Specific Plan will be to avoid the canyon-like affect; R:\MinutesPC~003\l 11903 4 · That 50% of the projects are required to provide architecture forward; that all proposed projects meet this requirement; · That all plots will include decorative hardscape; · That the fencing plan has been reviewed and determined acceptable; That staff determined that the proposed project will be consistent with the Design Guidelines of the Specific Plan and the General Plan; however, the following are minor changes to the proposed conditions: o Condition of Approval No.14 -- add language or as amended by these conditions; Condition of Approval No. 19 - amended to read the applicant shall apply for and receive approval of Model Home Complex permit; o That the added Development Impact Fee (DIF) categories as single-family residential conditions of approval. For Commissioner Guerriero, Associate Planner Long relayed that the architectural features will meet the intent of the Specific Plan and Design Guidelines for the Monterey architectural style. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Long noted that of the four floor proposed plans, staff required one roofline of each plan to have some variation from the others. Commissioner Olhasso relayed that the Craftsman and the Ranch style homes were disappointing compared to the Design Guidelines and, therefore, was of the opinion that this proposed project is not where it should be at this time. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Jim Teergarden, 110 N. Lincoln Street, of Griffin Communities, relayed that many months and man hours have been devoted to this project and that the applicant has made every change requested by staff. Mr. Charles Addington, 17992 Mitchell South, representing KTGY Group Architecture and Planning, relayed the following: o That the floor plans have a different silhouette; that the silhouettes of Plan No. one is different from Plan No. two which create a variation from the street. Advising that she could no approve the proposed project at this time, Commissioner Olhasso relayed that she would be willing to work through some suggestions with the Commission if the applicant were willing to spend the time. Echoing Commissioner Olhasso's comments, Commissioner Guerriero expressed confusion with regard to the Monterey style home presentation viewing it as a California stucco box. R:'A, linutesPC~003\l 11903 5 In response, Mr. Addington stated that the proposed Monterey style would be historically accurate and that this particular style does not have a lot of arched elements; that the proposed style would be more accurate then the depiction in the City's Guidelines. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Addington noted that for the Mediterranean style, a Spanish Colonial theme style was chosen; that this style has a lot of arched elements, arched colonnades, rounded windows, shaped shutters, barrel tile roof, and wrought iron grill details which would be consistent with the Spanish Colonial. Commissioner Mathewson noted that from his view, there are only two architectural styles. Mr. Addington stated that the proposed project depicts four distinct styles as defined by the Specific Plan; that only three styles were required; but that a fourth style was added for variety. Commissioner Olhasso noted that neither the Craftsman style nor the Ranch style on Plan No. one would be acceptable. Relaying his disappointment with the Commission's comments, Mr. Teegarden advised the applicant and his representatives have made every concession requested and was of the opinion that this project would be acceptable to the Commission. Mr. Addington echoed that the applicant was of the opinion to have met the objectives of staff with this project. In light of the confusion with regard to the styles, Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern with the direction given to the applicant. Commissioner Mathewson relayed that there are significant differences between the design guidelines and what was presented. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested that other examples of a Monterey style homes be presented to the Commission. In the interest of being specific for the architect, Commissioner Olhasso suggested working on the garage doors and that the Plan three homes need a new shape. Commissioner Telesio expressed concern with the wrap-around of the homes and is of the opinion that there needs to be more specific detail on the other three sides of the homes. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested forming a sub-committee. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Kevin Everett, representing Ashby USA, stated that the applicant has worked with staff for several months and the concerns of the Commission must be resolved this evening. Mr. Rob Rodine, 110 Lincoln Avenue, representing Griffin Communities stated that he is concerned with the Commission's comments noting that the architects have spent a tremendous amount of time working to stay within the guidelines; that this product is for the consumer and that they have spent thousands of dollars on focus studies and research with regard to what the consumer's needs are. R:\MinutesPC~2003\l 11903 6 Commissioner Mathewson noted that it is the Commission's duty to ensure that the design guidelines that were adopted for this type of project are being followed. Mr. Tom McAliester, 39430 Liefer Road, noted that the run-of onto his property from the developers is a problem. For Mr. McAliester, Chairman Chiniaeff noted that he contact the Engineering Department. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Chiniaeff stated that he agrees with the comments on both sides and is of the opinion that a sub-committee would be helpful. Director of Planning Ubnoske concurs with Chairman Chiniaeff in forming a sub-committee for the proposed item. Commissioner Mathewson and Commissioner Olhasso volunteered to be on the sub-committee. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to continue this item for another month. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 6 Planninq Application No. PA02-0522 an Amendment of the Temecula Re.qional Center Specific Plan to establish re.qulations .qoverninq temporary uses in parking lots of the Promenade Mall (40820 Winchester Road) located at the Promenade Mall RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A TEXT AMENDMENT OF THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDING SECTION III.C.1 TO ESTABLISH TEMPORARY USE REGULATIONS FOR THE LAND AREA ENCOMPASSED BY THE PROMENADE MALL AND SURROUNDING PARKING LOTS INTERIOR OF THE LOOP ROAD LOCATED AT 40820 WINCHESTER ROAD Director of Planning Ubnoske presented a brief staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: · That the proposed Specific Plan amendment will permit Car auto shows and sales, RV shows and sales, and Water craft and Boat shows and sales; That the current Development Code allows on a particular piece of property, no more than two of these events a year; that within this Regional Center Specific Plan, the language has been changed to allow up to 12 events, with the provision that there wii[ not be more than two a month; R:\MinutesPC~003\l 11903 7 · That staff worked with Mr. Doblado, auto dealers, and Council members noting that these events would be ideal for the City of Temecula; · That the proposed project will be exempt from environmental review. Mr. Dob~ado, 47820 Winchester Road, General Manager of the Promenade Mall, noted the following: · That his first commitment would be to the tenants of the mall, ensuring sufficient parking; · That the tenants expect to have a vibrant shopping center, providing an entertainment venue; · That by approving the proposed Specific Plan (SP) amendment, this would generate a positive venue that would continue to encourage customers visiting the mall; · That thus far, past car shows have been successful (Red Robin between Sears and Edwards theater). For Commissioner Olhasso, Mr. Doblado noted that the site for the proposed amendment would depend on the type of event. For Chairman Chiniaeff, Mr. Doblado relayed that his major focus is to work within the local communities; that the business base of Temecula would be those addressed first; that these businesses will have the first right of refusal as to participation. For Commissioner Telesio, Mr. Doblado noted that the majority of the participants would be City businesses. Commissioner Telesio remarked that he would prefer to see a balance between profit and non- profit events. In response to Commissioner Mathewson's concern with the duration of the events, Mr. Doblado relayed his understanding of the Commission's concerns but stated that his responsibility would be to ensure the success of the tenants and, therefore, would not propose a project that would jeopardize the sales of his tenants. Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that all proposed events would still need to obtain a temporary use permit from the City; that the Public Works Department will be viewing traffic circulation, the Planning Department will be viewing parking spaces, and that the City will have an oppodunity to condition and provide input on upcoming events. For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Doblado reiterated that the interest of his tenants would be his first priority. For Commissioner Mathewson, Ms. Ubnoske noted that staff will be viewing where these proposed events could be held and that there could be a possibility that future events could be moved away from the entertainment area. R:\MinutesPC~O03\l 11903 8 For Chairman Chiniaeff, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the Specific Plan (SP) language can be written to reflect the number and duration of events and that this could be incrementally increased by the Director of Planning. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve for profits events be limited to a total of six, of which two could have a period of 14 days and the other four would be limited to a maximum of seven days which would be for profit only. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Director of Planning Ubnoske requested that the applicant readdress the matter to have the mall come back in a year or two in order to expand the number of events if it were the will of the Commission. Item No. 7 was moved off calendar per the request of Planning Director Ubnoske. 7 Planninq Application No. PA02-0371 and PA02-0372 Chan.qe of Zone from Low Density Residential (L-l, One-acre minimum lot size) to Low Density Residential (L-2, One-half acre minimum lot size), and Tentative Tract Map to subdivide a 4.57 acre site into seven sinqle family residential lots ranqinq from .5 acres to .82 acres, located on the east side of Ynez Road, approximately 470 feet north of Santiaqo Road (APN 945-060-006) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION PA02-0372, A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L-l) TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L-2), AND PLANNING APPLICATION PA02-0371, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 30169 SUBDIVIDING A 4.57 ACRE PARCEL INTO SEVEN (7) RESIDENTIAL LOTS RANGING BETWEEN .5 AND .8 ACRES IN NET LOT AREA, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD, OPPOSITE QUIET MEADOWS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 473 LINEAR FEET NORTH OF THE CENTER LINE OF SANTIAGO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 945-060-006 COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern with signage on Winchester Road and that the theater sign at the Promenade Mall is in need of repairs. For Chairman Chiniaeff, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the Black Angus is in violation of the conditions of approval with regard to the water fountain and that Code Enforcement will be investigating the issue. R:\MinutesPC~003\l 11903 9 Commissioner Telesio commented on the City Council's meeting of November 18, 2003, requesting a copy of the presentation with regard to Mello Roos and bonding processes. For Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that the Code Enforcement reports are currently pending. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director of Ptanning Ubnoske relayed her understanding of the Commission's frustration with regard to the product review submitted by Griffin Communities. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested using a consulting architect to assist in projects of this nature. In response to Director of Planning Ubnoske, Chairman Chiniaeff and Commissioner Guerriero volunteered the serve on the campus project sub-committee. ADJOURNMENT At 8:20 p.m., Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetin.q to be held on Wednesday, December 3, 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Chairman Director of Planning R:\MinutesPC~2003\l 11903 10